HomeMy WebLinkAbout081093 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
AUGUST 10, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to
Govemment Code Section 54956.9 (a), (b) Bnd (C) tO discuss ending litigation.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-14
Resolution: No. 93-67
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor J. Sal Muftoz presiding
Invocation
EIder Greg LeBlanc - The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints
Flag Salute
Councilmember Parks
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Robarts, Stone, Muf~oz
PUBLIC FORUM
This is · portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecule. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote e
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
'Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
Agenda/011013 I 01/04/13
For all other agenda items e 'Requestto Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the' Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 13, 1993;
3
Resolution Aooroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Aeenda/OIlOel
4
City Treasurer's RePort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of June 30, 1993.
Purchase of Stencilina/Graffiti Removal Truck
:
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the acquisition of a street stenciling truck from Roadline
Products of Hutchinson, Kansas in the amount of ~45,024.
6
Improvement Fundins Aoreement with Ieo Rorioauah and the County of Riverside for
the Improvement of the Santa r-ertrudis Creek Channel and ~rading of the Rorioauoh
ProDarty adjacent to the Channel
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve the Improvement Funding Agreement with Leo Roripaugh and
the County of Riverside and authorize the Mayor to execute the
Agreement on the City's behalf and the City Clerk to attest to the same.
7 Release Subdivision Monument Bond for Parcel Meo No. 23335
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monument Bond for Parcel Map
No. 23335 and direct the City Clerk to release the bond to the surety.
8 Status Report on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Listina of the California
Gnatcatcher as a FederalIv Threatened Species
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Receive and file report.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may 'be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
~&eeed&~llOel 3
9
Plot Plan No. 249. Amendment No. 2: Variance No. 13 - Temecule Valley Auto Mall
Marouee
(Continued from the meeting of July 13, 1993)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 249, AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSTRUCT A
SEVENTY-THREE FOOT SIGN WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD ON
A PARCEL CONTAINING 5.07 ACRES LOCATED AT 26631 YNEZ ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-080-039
9.2
Adopt · resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 13 TO PERMIT A SEVENTY-THREE FOOT HIGH
SIGN IN THE SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-P-S) ZONE LOCATED AT
THE WESTERN PORTION OF 26631 YNEZ ROAD
10 Murrieta Creek Drainaae Plan Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Introduce an ordinance emitled:
ORDINANCE NO, 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
90-04 REGARDING MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR
SUBDIVISIONS
COUNCIL BUSINESS
11 . Designation of Voting Delegate for Leaaue Annual Conference
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Designate a voting representative and an alternate.
/t~vll//081013 4 01/04/10
12 Development Agreement No. 92-1 and Chanoe of Zone No. 21 - Linfield
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Adopt a Negative Declaration for Development Agreement No. 92-1 end
Change of Zone No. 21;
12.2
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 92-1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE LINFIELD SCHOOL FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD TO
ENSURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING,
CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY, SKILLED NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A NINE
HOLE PRIVATE GOLF COURSE AND DEDICATION OF A 2.3 NET ACRE PARCEL
TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR A SENIOR CENTER LOCATED NORTH OF
PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND 'EAST OF THE
TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
12.3
Read by title only end introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21, CHANGING
THE ZONE FROM R-R {RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL)
ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANCHO
VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 946..070-008
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMFNT
Next meeting: August 17, 1993, 7:00 PM, General Plan Public Hearing, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: August 24, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecule Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - ~o be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
CONSENT CALENDAR
DIRECTORS:
Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
1 Minutes
Anyone wishing to .address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
2
3
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of July 13, 1993;
Award of Riverton Park Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the plans and specifications and award a contract of $312,000
to Cunningham-Davis Corporation, for the construction of Riverton Park
Project No. PW 93-04CSD and authorize the President to execute the
contract.
2.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $31,200 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount, for a total budget of $343,200.
2.3
Relieve Valley Crest Landscape, Inc., of its apparent low bid, due to a
clerical error.
Acceotance of Grant Deed for Ooen Soace Areas "The VillaQes Community Association
No. Two"
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Accept grant deed for two (2) mini-parks (Calla Aragon Park and Bahia
Vista Park), and open space areas within The Villages Community
Association No. Two- Tracts 21672-2 through -4 and Tracts 21673-1
and -3.
/~ende/011013 8 OIR)4/13
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting: August 24, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
O
Aealda:/OIlOI3 7 ~
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINn
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
1
2
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mur~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 13, 1993;
Exoenditure Limit of Tax Increment Revenue
(Continued from the meeting of July 13, 1993)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Consider seeking an amendment to the Stipulated Judgment in Dawes
v. City of Temecula to raise or eliminate the limitation on the use of tax
increment revenues.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT ·
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: August 27, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
,Ace'de/OIl013 I 01/04/93
ITEM NO.
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 13, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was held on Tuesday, July 13, 1993,
7:20 P.M. at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California,
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding. Councilmember Stone led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
-. Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Harris Mullen of the Seventh Day Adventist Church.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
A Special Achievement Award was presented to Jayson Glen Ashton for winning the Junior
World Black Belt Championships and receiving his first degree black belt at the age of ten (10)
years old.
PUBLIC FORUM
Jack Mowry, 27147 Rainbow Creek Drive, Temecula, presented the Council with a proposed
amendment to Ordinance 90-24 addressing property appearance. Mr. Mowry stated that he
has contacted City Code Enforcement and he was advised that there are no definitive outlines
for landscaping maintenance, trash can storage, etc. Mr. Mowry asked that the Council
consider the proposed amendment for modification to Ordinance 90-24.
Ken Barnes, 39695 Berenda Road, Temecula, presented the Council with a petition containing
766 signatures from residents around the French Valley Airport, opposing a lease between the
airport and Hiser Helicopters, based on the following: 1) violates the zoning laws in training
area; 2) currently trespassing on private property; 3) incompatible with SWAP; 4) does not
meet the EDA's E.IoR.; and 5) will create an unnecessary and undesired antagonisim between
the community and the airport. Mr. Barnes stated that there were several airports that would
welcome Hiser Helicopter and said that he feels the area is not compatible with a helicopter
training area.
CCMIN07/13/93 -1- 7111/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993 ~.~
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Stone requested Item No. 6 end Item No. 7 be removed from Consent
Calendar for discussion.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts abstained from Consent Calendar Item No. 6 due to a potential
conflict of interest with regards to his employer.
Councilmember Birdsall abstained from Consent Calendar Item No. 8 due to a potential
conflict of interest.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items No. I - 5 and Items No. 8 -13, with Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs
abstaining from Item No. 6 and Councilmember Birdsall abstaining from Item No. 8.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of June 8, 1993;
Approve the minutes of June 15, 1993;
Approve the minutes of July 1, 1993.
CCMIN0711 3/~3 -2- 711 1/13
JULY 13,1993
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES
3. Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
e
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of Mey 31, 1993.
Resolution Establishino Citv's Gann AooroDriations Limit for the Fiscal Year 1993-94
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 1993-94
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pujol Street and First St. Street Widenina Project
(PW92-09)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW92-09,
Pujol St. and First St. Street Widening
e
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Sidewalk Imorovements on the south side of
Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the Community Recreation Center
(PW92-1 ~)
CCMIN07113/93 -3- 7116/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993 .-,,
10.
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the construction plans and specification and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for sidewalk improvements
on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the
Community Recreation Center (PW92-12).
State-Local Entity Master Agreement No. SLTPP-5459
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING STATE-LOCAL ENTITY MASTER AGREEMENT NO, SLTPP-5459,
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FUNDING PROVISIONS
11.
Proaram Suoolement No. 001 to State-Local Entity Master A~3reement No. SLTPP-5459
- Ynez Road Wideninq Project, (PW92-05)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO, 001 TO STATE-LOCAL ENTITY
MASTER AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH
FUNDING FOR THE STREET WIDENING ON YNEZ ROAD FROM SOUTH OF
ROUTE 79N TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
12.
CCIWN07/13/93
Comoletion and Acceotance of Traffic Sianal Construction at Winchester Road and
Margarita Road, Proiect No. PW9~>-08
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Accept the Traffic Signal Construction at Winchester Road and Margarita Road,
· 4- 7111/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
Project No. PW92-08, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and
accept a six (6) month Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10%
of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
13.
Budget Amendments for Graffiti and Street Stencilino Prooram
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the budget amendments as outlined in the staff report.
6. Service Authority for the Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles
Councilmember Stone stated that he wanted to make it clear to the residents of
Temecula that the $1.00 assessment added to vehicle registration fees for the
abatement of abandoned vehicles, is due to County agreement which the City Council
is required to be a party to in order to receive funding in the amount of $22,000 to
defray abatement costs.
Chief Building Official Anthony Elmo advised the Council that the Service Authority
Assessment must be passed by a majority of the cities involved. Mr. Elmo stated that
the Council could vote against the proposal and if it is approved by a majority, the City
could join at that time.
Mayor Mur~oz urged the Council to vote against the Service Authority assessment. He
stated that the City is sufficiently handling the abatement of abandoned vehicles and
should not be forced into participating because all the other cities in the County are
participating.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue
this item to the next available meeting to monitor the progress and provide the Council
with the financial impacts to the City.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CCMIN07/13/93 .-6- 7111./93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
ABSTAIN: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberts
JULY 13,1993
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Storm Drain Imorovements on Jefferson
Avenue at Winchester Road (PW93-01)
Councilmember Stone asked Director of Public Works Tim Serlet to verify that the
intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road will not be affected during peak
hours.
Director Serlet confirmed that completion of the improvements will be staged for off-
peak hours.
Mayor Mufloz suggested that the services of a traffic director be utilized at critical
intersections within the City during construction phases.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 7 as follows:
7.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for storm drain improvements
on Jefferson Avenue at Winchester Road. (PW93-01)
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS:- Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufloz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14.
CC11N07113/93
Vesting Tentative Tract MaD 26941 (Crowne Hill Estates. a Subdivision of 133 Acres
into 28 Residential Lots) and Chanae of Zone No. 22 (tq change a portion of the
project from R-A-5 to R-A-2 ½ and to change a portion of the project R-A-~ ½ to R-A-5
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Muftoz stated that he is concerned with the amendment from sewer to septic,
based on the letter issued by the Riverside County Health Department.
Public Works Engineer Ray Casey clarified that the position of the Riverside County
~-- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
Health Department is that septic will be allowed subject to percolation testing on each
of the lots. Mr. Casey stated that percolation testing was done on one lot however,
the applicant deferred testing the other lots to a later date.
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 8:00 P.M.
Ernie Eggar, Urban Logic Consultants, 27463 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula,
representing the applicant Taylor-Woodrow Homes, advised the Council that the map
has been changed regarding the septic vs. sewer approval. Mr. Eggar stated the
original intent was to develop the project with septic systems and the E.I.R. was
prepared showing a septic system. Mr. Eggar verified that percolation tests were
performed on six lots to show that the lots do have adequate percolation.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
14.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-A-
5 TO R-A-2½ FOR PORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 26, 27 AND 28
AND A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-Ao2~ TO R-Ao5 FOR A PORTION OF LOTS
4 AND 10 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, AND TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941,
A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 133 ACRE PARCEL INTO 28 CUSTOM SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF PAUBA
ROAD AND 1800 FEET WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
Mayor
15.
Mufioz declared a recess at 8:05 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:45 P.M.
Plot Plan No. 243. Amendment No. 4 {WeI-Mart): Environmental Imoact Reoort No.
340 (Addendum and Mitioation Monitorino Report): Plannino Aoolication No. PA93-
0043 (Chanoe of Zone): end Tentative Parcel Mao No. ~73~3. Amendment No. 4 -
Located at the Southeast 'Corner of Ynez and Winchester Roads
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
City Attorney Scott Field advised the Council that Condition No. 2, Page 29, should
be amended to read "....Plot Plan No. 243, Amendment No. 4, except for claims or
actions caused by the sole negligence of the City of Temecula."
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 8:50 P.M.
CCMIN0711:3/93 -7- 7118/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
Barry Burnell, of T & B Planning Consultants, 3242 Halladay Street, Santa Ana,
representing the applicant, concurred with the changes to the conditions as proposed.
Philip Hoxsey, 43318 Cielo De Azul, Temecula, representing a group of concerned
residents who are calling themselves "Citizens Against Tax Subsidies", advised the
Council that the general citizenry is against the zone change and the incentive package
offered to Wal Mart.
Mayor Mu~oz read into the record a letter from Mr. Charles C. May expressing his
opposition to the City providing financial incentives to Wal Mart.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to close
the public hearing at 9:05 P.M. and approve staff recommendation as follows:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 340 WITH ADDENDUM,
ADOPTION OF THE STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND
APPROVAL OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER ROADS
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S) 910-130-O46, 047; 921-090-
001,002, 003, 004, 005 AND 006
15.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 243, AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO CONSTRUCT
340,034 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE TO INCLUDE A
125,584 SQUARE FOOT WAL-MART AND A 30,000 SQUARE FOOT
ADDITION TO THE WAL-MART ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 35.6' GROSS
ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER
ROADS AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
910-130-046 AND 910-130-047
15.4
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27323, AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
SUBDIVIDE 58.1 ACRES INT0 13 COMMERCIAL AND 2 REMAINDER PARCELS
CCMIN07/13/93 -I- 7~11/83
.,-.. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER ROADS AND
KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 910-130-046
AND 910-130-047
Councilmember Stone expressed his concern regarding the traffic element of the
Environmental Impact Report. Mr. Stone stated he feels the data received in early
1990 and 1991 is outdated compared with the present traffic conditions.
Councilmember Stone said he feels the traffic problems along this corridor will only get
worse and residents of Temecula and Murrieta will avoid traveling this corridor which
will have a negative impact on other shopping centers as well.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised that the E.I.R. addresses the entire
development, and not the 38 acre WaI-Mart development alone. Director Thornhill
stated the addendum to the E.I.R. addresses the current traffic conditions and the
traffic studies are very consistent with what the traffic models are showing.
Mayor Pro Tam Roberts stated that he more concerned with the access at the freeway
and he feels the freeway ramps and overpass will not be able to handle the traffic
generated by the shopping centers along this corridor. He also stated that the RTA is
designating bus turn-outs at the east and west side entrances to WaI-Mart and asked
that staff and Councilmember Parks work with the RTA to get the bus routes into the
shopping centers to make access easier for the users.
A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
15.2
Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93o
0043, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R {RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-P-S
{SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER ROADS, AND KNOWN AS
A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 910-130-046 AND 910-130-
047
CCMIN0711 3/93 -I- 7111/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
Mayor Muf~oz declared a recess at 9:35 P.M. to change the tape. The meeting reconvened
at 9:37 P.M.
A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs
NOES:: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Muf~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
16.
Redevelooment Aoencv Assistance for the Construction of WaI-Mart at the Southeast
Corner of Ynez and Winchester Roads
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 9:45 P.M.
Mark Ostoich, 600 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, attorney representing the
applicant, indicated that he was available for questions.
The following individuals expressed their opposition to the-Redevelopment Agency
assistance to WaI-Mart project:
Xina Gephart, 27181 Rainbow Creek Drive, Temecula, expressed opposition to Wal-
Mart coming to Temecula. Ms. Gephart stated that she was concerned that the jobs
with benefits base will be impacted by this store.
Richard Moriki, 40445 Carmelita Circle, Temecula, presented the Council with a
petition against the RDA assistance. Mr. Moriki stated that he was not concerned with
whether or not WaI-Mart moves to Temecula, however, he feels that they should stand
on their own merit and not receive financial assistance from the City. Mr. Moriki
stated that he feels there are other areas within the City that would benefit from the
funds which are being provided to WaI-Mart.
Kathleen Eyserbeck, 40246 Holden Circle, Temecula, expressed opposition to the Wal-
Mart incentive proposal.
Jayme Christian, 30762 Calle PiCa Colada, Temecula, expressed opposition to the Wal-
Mart incentive proposal.
Gladys Murriz, Gilwood Court, Temecula, stated that she was in opposition to the Wal-
Mart incentive package. Ms. Murriz said that she feels that the Council is not listening
to what the majority of Temecula residents are saying regarding this matter.
CCMIN07113/93 -10- 7118/13
~__ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
Lori Ruben, 27483 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, expressed opposition to the WaI-Mart
incentive proposal.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation as follows:.
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CONSENTING TO THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SO AS TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WAL-NIART DEPARTMENT STORE AT THE
CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER ROADS
Councilmember Stone expressed concern that WaI-Mart is going to build a store in
Lake Elsinore, there are stores in Perris and in Hemet, and there is nothing to keep
them from building in Murrieta, requested that Council ask the applicant to limit future
locations within a five (5) mile radius as part of any assistance agreement.
Councilmember Parks asked the applicant's representative, Mark Ostoich, if WaI-Mart
would accept a five (5) mile radius limitation.
Mark Ostoich replied WaI-Mart would not agree to a five (5) mile radius.
Joe Meyer, attorney representing the applicant, advised the Council that when Wal-
Mart considers placing a store, they usually look at the trade area population, which
is somewhere around 100,000.
A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Mur~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
18.
Develooment Agreement No. 92-'1, Chanoe of Zone No. 21. Tentative Parcel MaD No,
27314. Amendmerit No. 3 - Linfield School
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to open
the public hearing at 10:20 P.M. approve staff recommendation as follows:
CCMIN07113/93 -11- 7118/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 13.1993
18.1
Continue this item to the meeting of July 27, 1993, at the request of
the applicant.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES: 0
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
19.
Ordinance Amendine Park and Recreational Facility Operation Policies and Reoulations -
Smokino Policy for City Parks and Recreation Facilities
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
continue this item to the meeting of July 27, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mur~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to extend
the meeting at 10:20 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
17.
Aooeal of Planning Commission Denial of Plot Plan No. 249. Amendment No. 2:
Variance No. 13 - Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marouee
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Councilmember Birdsall displayed the original sign proposal for the Auto Mall Marquee
and stated she preferred the original design.
Councilmember Stone stated that he liked the sign shown by Councilmember Birdsall
better than the designs proposed in the staff report and suggested that the sign be
approved, in concept, directing staff to prepare design criteria for the sign.
Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing at 10:30 P.M.
CCMII07113/93 - 12- 7118/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13, 1993
Duane Contento, representing Ad Art Signs, provided background on the sign proposal.
Councilmember Stone asked Mr. Contento if literature is available providing statistics
regarding the increase in sales from sign exposure.
Dan Atwood, representing Toyota of Temecula, advised the Council that he had tried
to get statistics such as this however, he could only get opinions. Mr. Atwood stated
that he feels one sign would better advertise the Temecula auto dealers.
Dick Kennedy, representing Honda of Tamecula, who is in the process of acquiring the
Dodge dealership and the Acura-Mazda dealership, advised the Council that the
marquee is a key part of the dealership purchase. Mr. Kennedy stated that during his
employment with a dealership located on Highway 101, it was noted that 25% - 35%
of the customers were generated by marquee exposure.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to close
the public hearing at 11:00 P.M. and approve the Auto Mall Marquee, in concept, and
direct staff to address the design considerations, working with a committee, and bring
back to the Council in thirty days for further consideration.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Robarts, Stone,
Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
City Manager David Dixon asked for two volunteers from the Council to participate
with two volunteers from the Planning Commission to work on the design criteria for
the Auto Mall Marquee.
Councilmembers Birdsall and Parks volunteered to participate.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20. Friendshio Baseball Tournament
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs advised the Council that as a result of assistance from John
Hunneman, KRTM Radio; the General Manager of Paradise Chevrolet, Terry Gilmore,
donated the funds needed to purchase the uniforms. The team members washed cars
and swept the car lots in return. Mayor Pro Tam Robarts added that the following
service club organizations each contributed $200.00 to sponsor the team's
participation in the tournament: Temecula Optimist Club, Temecula Noon Rotary Club,
CCMIN07/13/93 -13,- 7116/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
and Temecula Lions Club.
The report.was received and filed by unanimous consensus.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend
the meeting at 11:00 P.M. to 11:30 P.M.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Mufioz
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
JULY 13.1993
21. Discussion of Murrieta Creek/Army CorDs Correspondence
Councilmember Parks stated that he requested this item be placed on the agenda to
open a discussion regarding a letter sent to the Army Corp of Engineers stating the
City of Temecula's position relating to the Murrieta Creek and the 404 permit.
Councilmember Parks stated that ha would like the Mayor to present his own opinions
regarding any specific matters separately from the position of the City Council.
Councilmember Parks asked that a letter be forwarded to the Army Corp of Engineers
indicating the Council's support of the 404 permit submitted by the County Flood
Control District.
Mayor Mu~oz said that he feels he clearly distinguished his statements regarding the
Council's position on the 404 permit and his own personal feelings on the matter.
John Bell, 27111 Diaz Road, representing Hudson RCI, addressed the Council stating
his concerns regarding the statements made by Mayor Mufioz about the County Flood
Control Plan in his letter to the Army Corp of Engineers. Mr. Bell stated that he feels
the letter sent to the Army Corp of Engineers was one of opposition to the County
Flood Control Plan and was not based on the decision made at the joint Murrieta and
Temecula public hearing regarding the matter.
David Bartlett, 27111 Diaz Road, representing Hudson RCI, concurred with the
comments made by Mr. Bell.
Ray Johnson, a member of Urge and a member of the Murrieta Creek Advisory
Committee, Mr. Johnson stated that what came out of the public hearings was the
need for flood control, a flood control plan, a move toward the permit, and a move
toward consensus.
Russell Rumansoff, representing the Temecula/Murrieta Economic Development
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 13. 1993
Expediting Committee, expressed the committee's support of the original Council
action and invited the Murrieta Creek Advisory Committee to provided an update at the
August 10, 1993 E.D.C. meeting.
Pat'Keller, P.O. Box 521, TemecUla, stated that she feels there is an opportunity for
the whole community to have input on this project so that it represents the citizens of
Temecula and Murrieta.
Kathleen Hamilton, 42626 De Luz, Temecula, stated that she was present at the
meeting involving the Army Corp of Engineers end was very proud of the way Mayor
Mur~oz represented the citizens of Temecula and Murrieta. Ms. Hamilton stated that
she spoke with Colonel VanAntwerp, of the Army Corp of Engineers, and he stated
that he was very clear on the position of the City of Temecula.
Councilmember Parks stated that he would like to call the Army Corp of Engineers to
verify that they are clear on the position of the City of Temecula regarding the 404
permit and requested a letter from the Council if necessary.
Counciimember Stone stated he feels both the U.R.G.E. and County Flood Control Plan
compliment each other. Councilmember Stone stated that he was satisfied with the
representation and the permit process is moving forward with no delays.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts concurred with Councilmember Stone's comments.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to extend
the meeting at 11:35 P.M. to 12:00 A.M.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Mur~oz
NOES:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
22.
City Council Business Liaison
Councilmember Birdsall addressed the press release of June 25, 1993, regarding the
establishment of a "City Council Business Liaison" which was not presented to or
discussed by the City Council. Councilmember Birdsall said she feels it is not within
the authority of the Mayor or a volunteer representative to provide business assistance
to anyone due to the legal implications. Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels the
issue of the business liaison and appointment of a representative should have come
before the City Council.
CCMIN07113/93 -1 S- 711 8/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 13,1993
Mayor Muf~oz responded he feels he has the authority to ask for a volunteer to assist
him in carrying out various duties and commitments he has made. Mayor Muftoz
clarified that the business liaison merely directs individuals to sources at the City Hall
level and offers no advice on business matters or issues.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone requested that the issue of the Temecula Town Association leasing the
Temecula Fairgrounds to be placed on the next agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at
12:05 A.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday July 27, 1993,
7:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz
ATTEST:
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCIBN07113/93 -18- 7118/13
ITEM NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN E~HIHIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECI/LA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMII~E AND ORDER AS FOI !oOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$918,450,02.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall eerfify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 10th day of August, 1993.
ATI'EST:
I. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMF, C~)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 27th day of August, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOB:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILlVrP~MBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Rssos 325
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
07/22~3 TOTALCHECK RUN:
0~29~3 TOTALCHECK RUN:
08110/93 TOTALCHECKRUN:
07~9~3 TOTAL PAYROLL:
$45:314.03
$499,952.91
$269,800.09
$103,382.99
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/10/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
100
190
191
192
193
210
250
280
330
340
380
PAYROLL:
001
100
190
191
193
300
320
330
GENERAL
GAS TAX FUND
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
FACILITIES
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-DEBT SERV.
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
$158,797.18
$40,93,9.52
$35,934.39
$142.44
$8,941.82
$138,277.69
$16,039,25
$24,029.24
$2,251.97
$12,850.23
$16,612.92
$124.95
$359,455,50
$62,221.69
$13,996.47
$22,039.76
$422.16
$1,495.46
$357.02
$1,195.'79
$1,454.64
$318,450.02
$815,087.03
$103,382.99
$918,450.02
:REPARED BY~j~ MCI ~
'MARY~~EEMCLAr~N~~ANCEOFF~TER
.,
~ 'tE DIXON, CITY MANAGER
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING I$ TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
07/22193
15:19
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COIeqUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL ]HPROVENENT PROJ FUND
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMAT/ON SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
21,658.69
6,414.88
8,47~.45
254.54
25.19
1,467.65
57.32
96.73
2,141.03
3,646.80
1,071.75
45,314.03
VOUCHRE2
oT/r"'-
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11221
11226
11227
11228
11229
11230
11231
11232
11232
11233
11233
11233
11233
11~.tt,
11~_,
11234
11235
11235
11236
11237
11237
11237
11237
11237
11237
11237
11238
11238
11239
11240
112/,1
112/,1
112/,1
117""
15:19
CHECK
DATE
07/16/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07122193
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/B
07/22/f3
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22193
07/22/93
07/22/93
07122193
07122193
07/22/93
07/22/93
07/22/~J
07/22/93
07122/93
07/22/93
07/22/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000343
000101
000105
000127
000135
000135
000137
000137
000137
000137
000137
000138
000138
000155
000155
000170
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000184
000184
0001~5
000205
000228
000228
000228
000228
000228
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
HINDSOR CONSTRUCTION
LEEPER, DEBBIE
SASAKI, MlkiA
SAYLORS, PAN
APPLE ONE
AEI SECURITY, INC,
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CHEVRON U.S.A. ]NC.
CHEVRON U.S.A, INC,
CHEVRON U,S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
DAVL I N
DAVL I N
FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
INSTALLED LOCKS ON DOOR
+CSD REFUND/LEEPER, DEB
SASAKI/BUS LIC REFUND
TCSD REFUWD/SAYLORS, PA
LITTRELL ME 07/03
ALARM MONITORING; C/TY
52 k/~EKS SUBSCRIPTION
2 SPECIAL SIGNS FOR CIT
2 SPECIAL SIGNS FOR CIT
FUEL/JUNE/7~20772253
FUEL/JUNE/7920772253
FUEL/JUNE/7920772253
FUEL/JUNE/7~20772253
FUEL/JUNE/7~20772253
PHONE SYSTEM PAYMENT
PHONE SYSTEM PAYMENT
TAPE STOCK; PLANNING DE
TAPE STOCK; CITY COUNCI
DAY PLANNER & BINDER
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT M]SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT M]SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CALENDAR REFILL
GTE
GTE
909-695-15/,5 JUNE
909-699-8632 JUNE PAYME
ASCON HASLER MAILING SY METER RENTAL AND RESETS
KXDS PARTIES, ETC. CARNIVAL FOR DAY CAMP
NOBIL
MOBIL
NOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
NAY CREDIT CARD CHARGES
NAY CREDIT CARD CHARGES
RAY CREDIT CARD CHARGES
NAY CRED]T CARD CHARGES
NAY CREDIT CARD CHARGES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-I~-~99-5250
190-183-4954
001-1~-/,056
190-183-/,810
001-1/,0-999-5118
340-199-99~-5250
001-161-~9-5228
100-164-~-5244
100-164-~-5244
001-110-~-5262
001-170-~4~-5262
001-161-99~-5262
001-163-~-5263
001-162-999-526'3
320-1~0
320-2800
001-161-~-5250
001-100-~99-5250
001-163-~99-5220
001-1/,0-~99-5220
001-140-~9-5220
001-162-~-5220
001-162-~-5220
001-120-~)~-5220
001-1/,0-~-5220
001-120-~9~-5220
1~0-180-q9~-52/,0
320-1~-~99-5208
330-199-999-5~39
190-183-999-5340
001-110-~-5262
100-16/,-~9q-52&~
190-180-~-5263
001-161-999-5262
001-162-999-52d3
I TEN
AMOUNT
2,925.1)0
18.00
35. O0
50. O0
379./*7
35.00
161.62
106.67
119.72
86.55
26.07
110.62
384.80
360.05
1,067.52
80.17
/*08.59
83.83
37.15
1.22
57.18
6.26
165.64
300.30
2.79
196.65
16.16
227.25
200.00
24.00
1/,1.17
101.52
83.62
PAGE 2
CHECK
AlIOLINT
2,925.00
18.00
35.00
50.00
379 ./,7
35.00
48.00
268.29
727.76
1,427.57
212.81
227.25
200.00
394.09
VOUCHRE2
07/22/93 15:19
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUHBER DATE NIJHBER NANE
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
]TEN
AMOtJNT
CHECK
AI~3UNT
11242 07/22193 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22193 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/q3 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/~J 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07122193 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07122193 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11242 07/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH CITY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CITY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CITY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CITY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CiTY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CiTY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CITY ENPLOYE
PETTY CASH CITY EMPLOYE
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR CIT
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR CIT
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR C[T
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR CIT
JUNE PETTY CASH FOR CIT
001-110-9~-5260
001-140-~9-5260
001-150-999-5260
001-161-999-5262
001-162-~99-5228
001-163-~-5220
001-163-~-5260
320-199-999-5230
001-140-~9-5260
001-150-9~9-5220
001-161-999-5258
001-161-~-5260
001-162-~99-5260
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5260
15.00
7.50
5.85
5.00
50.42
5.39
6.74
11.25
15.50
25.86
35. O0
8.90
15.50
15.40
29. O0
252.31
11243 07/22/93 000262 RANCHO WATER
WATER CHARGES
193-180-~99-5240
930.17
930.17
11244 07/22/93 000266 RIGHTWAY
11244 07/22/93 O002&& RIGHTWAY
1124~ 07/22/93 000266 RIGHTWAY
112~, 07/22/93 O0O266 RIGHTWAY
11245 07/22/93 000280 SC SIGNS
11245 07/22/93 000280 SC SIGNS
11246 07/22/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
11246 07/22/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
11246 07/22/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
11246 07/22/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
SPORTS PARK PORT TOILET
6/25-7/22
SPORTS PARK CREDIT
SAN HICKS CREDIT
PLANNING PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS; CI
500/BUSINESS CARDS;
TAX
500/BUSZNESS CARDS; JOH
TAX
190-180-9~-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-~99-5238
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
289.55
1/,4.78
93.76-
86.08-
450.00
45.00
27.70
2.15
27.70
2.15
2u-~9
495.00
59.70
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 0002~4 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 0002~4 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE
CONPENSATION INS. JUNE
COIqPENSATION INS. JUNE
CONPENSAT]OR INS. JUNE
CONPENSATION INS. JUNE
COHPENSATIOR INS. JUNE
COHPENSATIOR INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
CONPENSATION INS. JUNE
CONPENSATIOR INS. JUNE
CONPENSATION INS. JUNE
CONPENSATIOR INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
CONPENSATION INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
CONPENSAT]OR INS. JUNE
CONPENSATION INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
COHPENSATION INS. JUNE
001-2370
100-2370
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370
001-1182
001-1182
001-2370
100-2370
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370
3,878.99
1,138.09
1,176.63
69.91
· 6.48
148.11
26.67
85.29
122.62
88.71
59.02
6,199.01
1,835.63
1,928.46
112.76
10.45
238.88
43.02
137.56
197.3'8
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
07IF'''~ 15:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIGOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NtJNBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11247 07122/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NAY EXPERIENCE NODIF]CA
11247 07122193 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NAY EXPERIENCE MOD]F]CA 100-2370
11247 07122193 000294 STATE CORPENSAT]OR INS. NAY EXPERIENCE MOD]F]CA 190-2370
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NAY EXPERIENCE HOOIFICA 191-2370
11247 07/22193 000294 STATE CORPENSATIOR INS. NAY EXPERIENCE 113DIFICA 192-Z~70
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE CONPENSAT[OR INS. NAY EXPERIENCE NODIF[CA 193-2370
11247 07122193 000294 STATE CONPENSAT[OR INS. NAY EXPERIENCE MOI)[F[CA 300-2370
11247 07122193 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NAY EXPERIENCE NCI)[FICA 320-2370
11247 07122193 000294 STATE CONPENSAT]OR INS. NAY EXPERIENCE NODIFICA 330-2370
11247 07/22/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NAY EXPERIENCE NOD]FICA 001-1182
3,800.27
1,124.34
1.275.38
71.87
8.26
150.49
27.04
81.90
141.04
35.48
24,220.14
11248 07/22/93 000320 TOgN CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-103-~-5220
11248 07/22/93 000320 TOM( CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-~-5220
11248 07/22/93 000320 TO~N CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-~-5220
14 33
38.53
2.23
55,0~
11249 07/22/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/NIJNOZ,ROBERTS & 001-100-999-5258
11249 07/22/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/DD/JULY 21-23 001-110-999-5258
406.00
338.00
744.00
11250 07/22/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-16~-999-5243
11250 07/22/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
11250 07/22/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE STERLING & REED UNIFORM 190-180-999-5243
11~SJ:L 07/22/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE STERLING & REEO UNIFORM 190-180-999-5243
15.50
12.50
13.80
13.60
55.40
112.. 07/22/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AOREENENT; 5100 C 330-199-~-5239
2,~58.11
2,~58.11
11252 07/22/93 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SNAKE BITE KITS 100-164-999-5218
11252 07/22/93 000~47 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PROTECTOR EYE gASH STAT 100-164-999-5218
11252 07/22/93 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE INSTANT ICE PACKS (LRG) 100-164-999-5218
11252 07/22/93 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE DISCOUNT 100-164-999-5218
11252 07122193 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE TAX 100-164-999-5218
11252 07/22/93 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ADJUST BILLING 100-164-999-5218
239.40
282.00
31.18
27.29-
40.71
.27
566.27
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4753 BH JUNE 190-180-999-5208
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4759 TE NAY 001-162-999-5208
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4752 SN JUNE 190-180-999-5208
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4754 KH JUNE 190-180-999-5208
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4755 VAN JUNE 190-180-999-5208
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4757 JG JUNE 001-120-999-5208
11253 07/22/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4758 RR JUNE 001-100-999-5208
37.85
53.26
100.09
42.69
46.92
36.98
52.18
369.97
11254 07/22/93 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M CORN SKILLS SEMINAR/AUG 001-162-999-5258
7~.00
7~.00
11255 07/22/93 000397 SAN DIEGO ZOO
ENTRY INTO ZGO/70 KIDS& 190-183-999-5340
5~..00
544.00
11256 07/22/93 000408 AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C TRACTOR LEASE - TCSD JU 190-180-999-5239
11256 07/22/93 000408 AGRICREOIT ACCEPTANCE C TRACTOR LEASE - TCSD AU 190-180-999-5239
8~6.02
846.02
1,692.04
11257 07/22/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES;CIT 340-199-999-5212
11257 07/22/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES;CIT 340-199-999-5212
07/22/93 000442 CORPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING; CITY 340-199-999-5250
331.70
112.06
135.00
~3,76
135.00
VOUCHRE2
07/22/93 15: 19
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
11259 07/22/93 000447 COIqTRONIX OF HEMET
11260 07/22/93 000512 CADET UNIFORH
PARTS & LABOR TO MOVE B 340-199-~-5212
ENTRY RUG SERVICE; CITY 001-199-~-5250
11261 07/22/93 000539 WIIeqER YAIMDA ASSOCIATE LANDSCAPE ARCH SERVICES 210-190-120-5802
11262 07122/93 000557 JOHNSON REPEATER
1126.3 07/22/93 000558 ADVANCED MOBILCONN
JULY MOBIL COVERAGE 320-199-999-5209
MOBIL UNIT CHARGES 320-199-~99-5209
11264 07/22/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL
11264 07/22/93 000704 SKS. INC./INLAND OIL FUEL
11264 07/22/93 000704 SKS. INC./INLAND OIL FUEL
11264 07/22/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL
11265 07/22/93 000718 NRPA
001-110-~9-5262
100-164-999-5263
001-162-~9~-5263
190-180-999-5263
MAINT HiT TRAINZNG PRO 190-180-999-5258
11266 07/22/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY MlSC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
11266 07/22/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY MARKING FLAG YELLOH 190-180-~99-5212
11266 07/22/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY SLIP FIX & COUPLING 190-180-999-5212
11267 07/22/93 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA 340-199-~99-5250
11268 07/22/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666403910024 DD JUN 001-110-999-5258
11268 07/22/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE SANK - 5473666403910073 JUNE R 001-100-999-5258
11269 07/22/93 001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING PLACE GUARD TOP SLURRY 100-164-999-5402
11270 07/22/93 001032 RIVERSIDE CO. DISTRICT GRAFFITI CONF REGISTRAT 001-170-9~9-5261
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AI~UNT
406.50
34.25
57.32
186.00
195,30
7.71
37.3.0~
41.26
86.44
610.00
10.78
51.49
34.15
133.81
990. O0
120.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
406.50
34.25
57.32
186.00
195.30
458.50
610.00
90.89
rd-~9
167.96
990.00
120.00
45,314.03
VOUCHRE2
07/7""'
11:52
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COIeeJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOFNEMT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
~.0 FACILITIES
380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
ANOUNT
93,087.59
7,819.6~.
22,21/,.53
4~15.19
117.25
5,572.69
375.00
2,8~2.57
883.71
5,398.20
2,717.8~
124.95
358,383.75
499,952.91
VOUCHRE2
07/29/93 11: 52
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AROUNT
11222 07/22/93 000253 POSTMASTER
LABOR FORCE STUOY PERHI 280-199-999-5264
600.00
600.00
11271 07/22/93 000878
11272 07/27/93 001072
11275 07/27/93 000939
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA
ICBO-]NLAND EMPIRE CHAP
DRAW ON LOAN AGREEMENT
TRUST 60310
METAL STUD HONES SEM/NA
001-1500
380-10~0
001-162-999-5258
39,582.26
358,383.75
100.00
39,582.26
358,383.75
100.00
241692 07/29/93 00028~
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 00028~
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/9c5 000283
241692 07/29/93 00028~
241692 07/29/93 0002&S
241692 07/29/93 000283
241692 07/29/93 00028~
241692 07/29/93 000283
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 000~.4
259630 07/29/93 000~
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 000,444
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 0004~
259630 07/29/93 000666
259630 07129193 0002~44
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 000444
259630 07/29/93 000/,44
259630 07/29/93 000~44
259630 07/29/93 000~44
11277 07/29/93
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDO)
FIRSTAX (EOD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX (EDO)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
LSK DEVELOPMENT
000283 FICAfMED
000283 FICAFNED
00028;1 FICAFMED
000283 FICAfNED
000283 FICArMED
000283 FICArMED
000283 FICIfMED
000283 FICI rMED
00028~ USXT
00028~ USIT
00028~ USIT
00028~ USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USlT
000283 USIT
001-2070
100-2070
190-20713
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
000444 CAIT 001-2070
000444 CAIT 100-2070
000666 CAIT 190-2070
000444 CA]T 191-2070
000444 CAIT 193-2070
000444 CAIT 300-2070
0004/~ CAZT 320-2070
000444 CAIT 330-2070
000444 SOl 001-2070
000/+44 sOI 100-2070
000666 SOl 190-2070
000666 SOl 191-2070
000444 SDI 193-2070
000444 SOl 300-2070
00{3444 SOl 320-2070
000444 SO1 330-2070
PLOT PLAN REFUND/LSK DE
001-163-4119
2,243.98
512.12
776.10
15.55
51.79
18.54
46.18
9,839.32
2,440.85
2,980.62
79.47
203.83
54.29
245.05
79.97
2,460.13
594.15
583.09
19.99
37.58
9.95
55.62
13.42
748.45
188.04
320,54
6.98
23.22
8.31
20.00
20.70
186.30
19,e~,-.28
5,110.17
186.30
11278 07/29/93
SCHMIDT, DANIEL
TCSD REFUND/SCHMIDT DAN 190-183-4994
15.00
15.00
11279 07/29/93
11280 07/29/93
11281 07/29/93
PRECISION FIBER OPTICS
HERRERA, HARTHA
ABBEY, CHRIS
TCSD REFUND/PREC/S]OR F
TCSO REFUND/HERRERA
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
190-18~-4994
190-1&3-4809
001-199-4056
365.00
65.00
35,00
365.00
65.00
'*"'~0
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
07/;~"" 11:52 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NilleER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER
iTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11282 07/29193
11283 07/29/93
TEMECULA FENCE AND DECK BUS LIC REFUND/TEN FENC 001-199-4056
UATKINS, ELLEN ~CSD REFUND/MATKINS 190-183-4809
35.00
30.00
35.00
3O.OO
11284 07/29/93 MAYO, GARY
11285 07/29/93 LESMEISTER, SUSAN
TCSD REFUNO/NAYO 190-183-~845
TCSD REFUND/LESNEISTER 190-183-498~
30.00
58.00
30.00
58.00
11286 07/29/93 PICKETT, TAMARA
TCSO REFUND/PICKETT 190-183-4982
65.00
65.00
11287 07/29/93 k/EST, SHERRi TCSD REFUND/~EST, SHERR 1~0'183'6982
30.00
30.00
11288 07/29/93 KENUALL FIREPLACES, INC KENgALL, REFUND BUSINES 001-199-4056
35.00
35,00
11289 07/29/93
~/ELLS, COLLEEN UELLS, REFUND TCSD 190-183-4986
33.00
33.00
11290 07/29/93
FELDSCHER, TON FELDSCHER, REFUND 190'183'4982
30.00
30.00
11291 07/29/93 000105 AEI SECURITY, INC. TEEN CENTER MONITORING 1~0-180-~-5250
35.00
35.00
11292 07/29/93 000131 CARL UARREN & co. PERAZZO, ROSEANN LOSS 0 300-199-999-5205
11~g~- 07/29/93 000131 CARL gARREN & CO, NOT]NATIONAL SYS LOSS 0 300-199-999-5205
11 07/29/93 000131 CARL UARREN & CO. TONLINSON, PAUL LOSS 12 300-199-999-5205
279.6~
206.00
215.25
700.88
11293 07/29/93 000138 CZTZCORP NORTH AMERICA AUG PAYMENT 320-1990
11293 07/29/93 000138 CiTiCORP NORTH AMERICA AUG PAYMENT 320-2800
11294 07129/93 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED TURN]NG MOVEMENT COUNTS 100-164-999-5406
351.40
1,076.17
300.00
1,427.57
300.00
11295 07/29/93 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 2ND QTR UNEMP & TRAININ 001-2350
11295 07/29/93 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 2ND GTR UNEMP & TRAININ 100-2350
11295 07/29/93 000160 EMPLOYMENT OEVELOPNENT 2NO GTR UNEMP & TRAININ 190-2350
11295 07/29/93 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 2ND GTR UNEMP & TRA%NIN 192-2350
11295 07/29/93 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 2ND QTR UNEMP & TRAININ 193-2350
11295 07/29/93 000160 EMPLOYMENT OEVELOPMENT 2ND QTR UNEMP & TRAININ 330-2350
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT STENO BOOK 001-120-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NlSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES; 001-162-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT MlSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES; 001-140-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NlSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES; 001-140-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT MEMO 001-120-999-5220
11296 07/29/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT MEMO 001-199-999-5220
2,8~9.97
358.50
1,641.08
117.25
7.02
238.26
343.30
12.54
87.40
58.83
12.25
11.79
213.35-
78.50-
5,202.08
23~.26
11297 07/29/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO PRINTER 320-199-999-5221
11297 07/29/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO MONITOR UPGRADE CHARGE 320-199-999-5221
11297 07/29/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5221
494.87
100.00
7.75
602.62
11298 07/29/93 000184 GTE 909-699-2475 100-164-999-5208 16.85 16.85
VOUCHRE2
07/29/93 11: 52
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
11299 07/29/9:5 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
1 T299 07/29/93 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
11299 07/29/9:5 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
11299 07/29/93 000192
VENDOR
NAME
GLOBAL COltoUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COHPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COHPUTER SUPPLIE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
C~81A. AUTO DATA SMITCH
C0106 HP FILM PLOTTER P
C0110 HP FILM PLOTTER P
C0111 HP PLOTTER PENS F
C9405 IBM CONP 101 KEYB
C3024 SHIELDED DISK WAL
C4744 1401)ULAR MALL JACK
r.~742 HODULAR WALL JACK
FRE I GHT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
ITEM
AMOUNT
248.00
4.28
4.28
4.28
95.00
14.95
16.76
14.34
13.56
31.71
CHECK
AMOUNT
447.16
11300 07/29/93 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON
11301 07/29/93 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC.
CONSTRUCTXON SURVEYS 100-16~-999-5248
ENTERTAINNENT/NONNY & M 190-183-999-5330
1,025.80
50.00
1,025.80
50.00
11302 07/29/93 000238
11302 07/29/93 000238
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
TRADESHON EXPENSES ND&N
CREDIT OF EXPENSES
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REN 000246 PER REDE 001-2130
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 000246 PER REDE 100-2130
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN 000246 PERS RET 100-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
11303 07/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
11304 07/29/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11304 07/29/93 000249 PETTY CASH
1130~ 07/29/93 000249 PETTY CASH
11305 07/29/93 000262 RANCHO WATER
11305 07/29/93 000262 RANCHO WATER
11306 07/29/93 000266 RIGHTWAY
11307 07/29/93 000282 SCHAF
TARGET STORE
TEMECULA TROPHY
11308 07/29/93 000305
CASH REINB FOR TCSD
CASH REIMB FOR TCSD
CASH REIMB FOR TCSD
JUNE BILLING
JUNE BILLING
PORTABLE TOILET 4TH OF
53 SOFTBALL RULEBOOKS
MISC RECREATION SUPPLIE
SOFTBALL CLOCK
11309 07/29/93 000307
190-182-999-5301
190-183-999-5310
190-183-999-5340
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5238
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5300
190-183-932-5300
2,269.13
26.56-
107.35
107.35
10,689.45
2,134.29
2,162.97
70.85
247.14
218.52
217.45
49.87
9.19
12.09
.42
1.4~
,46
.93
1,86
23.85
19.19
36.00
4,577.80
616.78
~22.25
371. O0
102.67
52.95
2,242.57
16,1Z2.41
5,194.58
422.25
371.00
102.67
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
07/y"" 11:52 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT
NUNBER DATE NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTZON NUMBER
ITEM
ANOUNT
CHECK
ANO, JNT
11309 07129193 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY ~OFTBALL PLAQUE 1gO- 183-~32-5300
11309 07/29/93 000307 TENECULA TROPHY TAX 190-183-932-5300
36.95
6.97
96.87
11310 07/29193 000320 TOt4N CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
001 - 163-~-5220
47, 95
47.95
11311 07/29/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE TO ORLANDO/BIRD 001-100-999-5258
5~.50
596.50
11312 07/29/93 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 001-2120
11312 07/29/93 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 1~0-2120
11312 07/29/93 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 300-2120
86.50
17.50
.50
10~.50
11313 07/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFONNS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
12.50
12.50
11314 07/29/93 O00;rNf. 1 MILLDAN ASSOCIATES
11315 07/29/93 000358 DIXON, DAVID F.
PLAN CHECKS & PROJECTS 001-163-999-5249
RE!II. ICNA REGISTRATIO 001-110-f99-5258
15,456.17
405.00
15,456.17
405.00
11316 07/29/93 000370 BIRDSALL, PATRICIA
LEAGUE OF CA CITIES JUN 001-100-~-5258
16~.31
164.31
11317 07/29/93 000374
11317 07/29/93 000374
11]/12,07/29/93 000374
113. 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
11318 07/29/93 000375
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
6/07-7/07 191-180-~-5319
06/25-07/26 190-180-~-5240
6/25-7/26 1~J-180-~-5240
909-202-4764 JH JUNE 93 001-163-999-5208
909-202-4760 DAYCANP 190-180-999-5208
~09-202-4204 ~E JUNE ~J 001-110-~-5208
909-202-4751TS JUNE ~j
90~-202-4756 TH JUNE ~
90~-202-4759 TE JUNE 93
~09-202-4761SN JUNE 93
909-202-4762 RP JUNE 93
909-202-4763 PB JUNE 93
90~-202-4765 BB JUNE 93
90~-202-4767 GT JUNE 93
909-202-47(~ JS JUNE ~J
909-202-4770 DD JUNE q3
001-163-~-5208
320-1~-~-5208
001-162-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-1~3-~-5208
001-161-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-110-~-5208
221.93
3,855.25
422.87
53.14
102.18
4~.~5
82.75
43.57
45.66
180.47
97.06
46.64
45.25
59.15
44.83
86.15
4,500.05
~31.80
11319 07/29/93 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT
.BUS FOR TRIP TO SAN DIE 190-183-999-53~0
405.00
405.00
11320 07/29/93 000389 USCH/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160
11320 07/29/93 000389 USCH/PEBSCO, (ONRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160
11320 07/29/93 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160
11321 07/29/93 000403
SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA
JUNE SERVICE/NATERIALS
190-180-999-5212
48.24
120.00
848.0~
78~.00
1,016.28
784.00
11322 07/29/93 000/,28 HORIZON WATER
WATER AND CUPS
190-182-~-5240
91.15
91.15
11323 07/29/93 000/.62 CLUB, THE
BASKETBALL CLASS PAYNEN 190-183-999-5330
420.00
420.00
11324 07/29/93 000/,63 POLLARD, DONALD E. COUNTRY MESTERN DANCE P 190-183-999-5330 580.00 580.00
VOUCHRE2
07/29/93 11:52
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
11325 07/29/93 000465 STRADLEY, KATHY
11326 07/29/93 000466 t4H[TEHEAD, RHORDA
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
BELLY DANCING CLASS PAY 190-183-ggg-5330
TENNIS CLASS PAYMENT 190-183-~-5330
11327 07/29/93 00CY,67 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEIGK)N t4ONANS SELF DEFENSE CLA 190-183-999-5330
11327 07/29/93 000467 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEIGa3N TAEKWONDO CLASS 190-183-999-5330
11328 07129193 000471 IODE & COMPANY FLEX PLAN FEES FOR JUNE 001-150-999-5250
11329 07/29/93 000540 G. NE]L COMPANIES FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE 001-150-999-5228
11330 07129193 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S,D. ACCT SD-1075255 JUNE/JU 001-140-999-5208
11331 07/29/93 000602 DEAN#S PHOTO F[I.N AND FILM PROCESSIN 001-162-999-5250
11332 07/29/93 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CONNUN XCA8114361 JUNE/JULY 93 320-199-999-5208
11333 07/29/93 000625 VOOS, CHARLES VIDEO CLASS PAYMENT 190-183-999-5330
11334 07/29/93 000638 CAL]F. DEPT. OF CONSERV FEE REPORT STRONG NOT[O 001-2280
11334 07/29/93 O00638 CALIF. DEPT. OF CONSERV FEE REPORT STRONG NOTIO 001-2290
1133~ 07129193 000638 CALIF. DEPT, OF CONSERV FEE REPORT STRONG MOT]O 001-162-4229
11335 07/29/93 0006~5 SMART & FINAL
11336 07/29/93 000680 AMS-TNS
11337 07/29/93 00068/. OIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY
11338 07/29/93 000745 AT & T - CELLULAR
11339 07/29/93 000795 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
11339 07/29/93 000795 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
11340 07/29/93 000815 ROt~LEY, CATHERINE
11341 07/29/93 000860 JOCHUN, LORI
11341 07129193 000860 JOCHUM, LORI
11341 07/29/93 000860 JOCHUM, LORI
NISC RECREATION $UPPLIE 190-182-999'5301
RE'SUPPLY POSTAGE METER 330-199-999-5230
CA FISCAL CRISIS CONF 001-140-999-5261
619-987-1828-1MJN JUNE 001-140-999-5208
INTERPERSONAL SKILL SEN 001-140-999-5258
BUSINESS WRITING SEMINA 001-110-999-5258
TAP/JAZZ CLASS PAYMENT 190-183-999-5330
KINDERGYM CLASS PAYMENT 190-183-999-5330
BATON CLASS PAYMENT 190-183-999-5330
CORPUTER KIDS CLASS PAY 190-183-999-5330
11~2 07/29/93 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED RESTROOM SUPPLIES/POOL
11~3 07/29/93 000931 AROUNO A SUCK
11344 07/29/93 000937 C.M. ENGINEERING
11345 07/29/93 000938 FOXBRIAR FARMS
11346 07/29/93 000991 RESCUE SOURCE, THE
11346 07/29/93 000991 RESCUE SOURCE, THE
11346 07/29/93 000991 RESCUE SOURCE, THE
190-18~-999-5310
BALLOONS & FLAGS FOR NO 190-18~-999-5330
ENGINEERING FOR PROFESS 210-190-119-5802
HORSEMANSHIP CLASS PAYM 190-183-999-5330
PF7650; AMERICA CUP/RIV 001-171-999-5242
BG3180; 70' TNROgBAG, 3 001-171-999-5242
RP5074; 300' ROPE, 1/2" 001-171-999-5242
ITEM
AMOUNT
308.00
582.40
168.00
308.00
356. O0
8.75
94.74
10,52
1,692,54
144.00
7B4.58
2,3/,3.98
156.43-
39.04
2,100,00
135,00
4.56
99.00
149.00
384.00
336.00
140.00
403,20
49,26
11.58
375. O0
320. O0
79,00
69.95
267. O0
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOrJNT
308. O0
582,40
476.00
356.00
8.75
94.74
10.52
1,692.54
1~,00
2,100,00
135.00
4.56
248. O0
38~ ,00
879.20
49.26
11.58
375.00
320,00
.--,.~
VOUCHRE2
o7/p""
11:52
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
11346 07/29/93 000991
11346 07/29/93 000991
11346 07/29/93 000991
11347 07/29/93 000993
11348 07/29/93 001002
11349 07/29/93 001015
11349 07/29/93 001015
11349 07/29/93 001015
11350 07/29/93 001017
11351 07/29/93 001018
11352 07/29/93 001073
11353 07/29/93 001074
VENDOR
NAME
RESCUE SOURCE, THE
RESCUE SOURCE, THE
RESCUE SOURCE, THE
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC,
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK"
PROGRAMMED FOR SUCCESS,
PROGRAMMED FOR SUCCESS,
PROGRAMMED FOR SUCCESS,
PRICE SECURITY SYSTEM
EARTH PRODUCTS RECYCLIN
BUTTERWORTH
CLE INTERNATIONAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
1 TEN
DESCRIPTION
TAX
PF7660; EXTRASPORT ROGU
TAX
COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA
5473-_A664_-03910081 JUNE 9
ANNUAL USER GROUP SUPP
ANNUAL USER GROUP SUPP
HULTI USER'S GROUP - AC
GUARD SERVICE FOR JULY
GRINDING & REMOVAL OF T
ADA COMPLIANCE MANUALS
REGISTRATIOM/COMF. HUNO
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
340-199-999-5250
001-100-999-5258
3Z0-199-999-5211
320-199-999-5211
320-199-999-5211
190-183-999-5370
001-166-999-5401
001-150-999-5228
001-100-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
30.16
250.00
18.13
124.95
378.98
120.00
180.00
300.00
888.00
960.00
91.44
395.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
714.24
124.95
378.98
600.00
888.00
960.00
91.~
395.00
499,952.91
VOUCHRE2
07/29/9~
15:52
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVZCES D/STRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
U,,050.90
26,fi)5.00
5,260.41
1,901.48
137,8~5.57
16,039.25
21,186.67
1,271.53
5,311.00
10,248.28
269,800.09
VOUCHRE2
15:52
CZTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11384
11384
11384
11384
11384
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
11385
08/10/93
08/10/f3
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/9~
08/10/93
08/10/93
08110193
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08110193
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
BURKE WILLIAM$ & SOREMS
BURKE WILLIANS & SOREMS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SOREMS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SOltENS
BURKE WILLJAMS & SOltENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
5/31/93
5/31193
S/31/93
5/31/Q3
5131193
REPAIR STOR~ DAMAGE/SPO
IRRIGATION REPAIRS ON C
IRRIGATION REPAIRS ON C
IRRIGATION REPAIRS ON C
PROVIDE AERIFICATION OF
PROVIDE LABOR AND MATER
PROVIDE LABOR AND MATER
IRRIGATION REPAIRS AT C
PLANT TREES ON SADDLEgO
WEED ABATEMENT AT VETER
NEED ABATEHENT AT LA SE
001-130-999-52~6
001-1280
190-180-999-5246
001-166-999-5246
300-199-999-5205
001-166-999-5423
193-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
190-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
190-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5510
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
22,472.18
2,688.15
2,029.96
167,50
1,271.53
951.60
302.92
404.76
407.90
720.00
349.60
166.30
235.45
270.00
1,095.00
1,160.00
28,629.32
6,063.53
1138~
11386
11386
11,~7dd
11388
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
000143
000143
000143
000143
000202
000212
COPY LINE CORPORATION
COPY LINE CORPORATION
COPY LIME CORPORATION
COPY LINE CONPORAT]ON
J.F. DAVIDSON
LEWIS VALLEY CONTRACTOR
NAIWTEBANCE BASE CHARGE
RICOH 5540 COPIER TONER
FRE I GHT
TAX
PROF SERVICES THRU 06/3
PAYMENT OF RETENT]ON
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
100-164-999-5248
210-2035
2,688.00
5~.00
5.92
42.16
1,275,00
1,700,80
3,280.08
1,275.00
1,700.80
11389
11389
11390
11390
11390
11390
11390
11390
11391
11391
11391
11392
11393
11393
11393
11394
08/10/9]
08/10/9]
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08110193
08/10/93
08/10/93
08110193
08/10/93
000238
000238
000251
000251
000251
000251
000251
000251
000269
000269
000269
000270
000345
000:?~.5
0007,/,5
0007,4.5
000357
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
PLANNING CENTER, THE
PLANNING CENTER, THE
PLANNING CENTER, THE
PLANNING CENTER, THE
PLANNING CENTERe THE
PLANNING CENTER, THE
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RJM DESIGN GROUP
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CONPORATZON BILLI
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAMS.
MARKETING PROGRAM CORTR
MARKETING PROGRAM CONTR
PREP & ATTENDANCE OF CO
AMENDMENT TO COMe271 TO
DEVELOPMENT CODE PROCES
DEVELOPMENT CODE PROCES
DEVELOPMENT CODE PROCES
OEVELOPMENT COOE PROCES
HIGH QUALITY 8.5 X 11P
HIGH QUALITY 11 x 17 PA
TAX
NAY CHG
METER USAGE FOP, 5100 XE
XEROX DEVELOPER;5100 CO
FUSER NEB REPLACEMENTS;
TAX
YEARLY TRAFFIC SIGNAL M
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
001-161-999-5248
001-161-999-5248
001-161-999-5248
001-161-999-5248
001-161-999-5248
001-161-999-5248
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
250-190-129-5802
330-199-QQ9-5582
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
100-164-999-5405
2,666.67
18, 520. O0
1,450.00
83.51
1,653.39
3,642.50
1,072.97
1,507.95
1,528.00
34.50
121.09
16,039.25
1,182.13
741.00
220,00
74.48
13,488.00
21,186.67
9,410.32
1,68~.59
16,039.25
2,217.61
13,488.00
117""' 08/10/93 000386 LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS LEADLESS TAPES, 60 MIN. 001-163-999-5220 55.00
VOUCHRE2
07/29/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
11395
11395
11395
11395
11395
11396
11396
11397
11397
11397
11397
11398
11398
11398
11399
11399
11400
11400
11401
11402
11403
11403
11404
11404
11405
15:52
CHECK
DATE
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
00110193
08/10/93
00/10/93
08/10/9:5
08/10/9~
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
00/10/93
08110193
00/10/93
08/10193
08/10193
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
08/10/93
VENDOR
NUIqBER
000]86
000386
000386
0OO386
000386
000~7~
000513
000513
000513
000513
000539
000539
000539
000756
000756
000818
000818
00088]
000884
000979
000979
001006
001006
001061
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOGS
VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT ITER
NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
LANIER VOICE PROOUCTS
LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS
LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS
LAN!ER VOICE PRODUCTS
LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS
SIERRA COHPUTER SYSTENS
SIERRA CORPUTER SYSTENS
SZNNONS, BECKY RCLEAN
SINlIONS, BECKY RCLEAN
SINNONS, BECKY RCLEAN
SINNONS, BECKY NCLEAN
WlleIER YAHADA ASSOCIATE
WINleER YANADA ASSOCIATE
WIteeER YANADA ASSOCIATE
IPS SERVICES, INC,
IPS SERVICES, INC,
SIGNAL NAINTENANCE, INC
SIGNAL NAINTENANCE, INC
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
LARUE PAINTING
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
BURTRORICS BUSINESS SYS
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS
WILLIANS-CARD, KZNBERLY
FREIGHT 001-163-~-5220
TAX 001-163-~-5220
LEADERLESS TAPES STD 60 001-120-~-5220
SHIPPING 001-120-~9-5220
TAX 001-120-999-5220
PROGRAIqlNG ASSISTANCE
PROGRANING ASSISTANCE
001-161-999-5250
320-199-999-5250
QUATTRO PRO BEGINNING C 320-1~-~-5250
WORDPERFECT PRESENTATIO 320-1~-~q~-5250
WORDPERFECT BEGINNING C 320-1~-~-5250
KIDPERFECT INTERREDIAT 320-1~9-~-5250
JUNE SERV.
PERFORM STEPHEN'S KANGA
PERFORM HEC-2 ANALYSIS
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
GRADING AND PARKING SER 210-199-801-580/,
RETENTIOR 210-2035
PW92-06 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 210-165-611-5804
RETENTION 210-2035
REPAIR AND CONPACT SLOP 100-164-999-5402
GRAFFITI REHOVAL FOR AP 001-170-999-5293
REPAIR 3 DRIVEWAY APPRO 100-164-999-5402
EXTRA WORK 100-164-999-5402
JACKET LOADER FOR NZCRO 330-1940
PAPER SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
ON-SITE SOFTWARE TRAINI 320-199-999-5250
2.30
4.~
960.00
6.37
~.90
1,78~.00
1,911.00
425.00
425.00
425.00
425.00
6,812.50
6,500.00
9,950.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
ANOUNT
1,103.01
3,700.00
1,700.00
23,262.50
102,490.75
10,249.08- 92,241.67
22,9~ .00
2,293.40- 20, ~0
9,000. O0 9 , 000. O0
4,707.50 4,707.50
2,742.00
200.00
3,067.00
761.64
1,700.00
2,942.00
3,828.64
1,700.00
TOTAL CHECKS
269,800 · O~
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
August 10, 1993
SUBJECT:
City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of June 30, 1993.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of June 30, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1993
City of Temecula
City Treaeurer's Report
As of June 30, 1993
Cash Activity for the Month of June:
Cash and Investments as of June 1, 1993
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of June 30, 1993
$
$
42.242,873
3,421,759
(4,015,342)
41,649,290
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Interest Checking
Benefit demand deposits
Benefit demand deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Comp. Fund
Trust accounts-TCSD bonds
Trust accounts-RDA bonds
Institution
City Hall
First Interstate
Bank of Amedca
First Interstate
Bank of America
State Treasurer
ICMA
Bank of America
Bank of America
Yield
2.500%
1.100%
4.554%
2.733%
2.733%
Balance
800
409,233
18,116
9,585
0
18,995,657
367,921
4,583,049
17,264,929
41,649,290
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount includes outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's Investment Policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant
z
(D
B
w
ITEM.-5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
/ \ k,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
August 10, 1993
Purchase of Stenciling/Graffiti Removal Truck
PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the acquisition of a street
stenciling truck from Roadline Products of Hutchinson, Kansas in the amount of
$45,024.
DISCUSSION: On June 22, 1993, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 1993-
94 Operating Budget, which included a street stenciling and graffiti removal program.
Funding for this program was approved through a Public Works budget amendment
which was approved by the City Council on July 8, 1993.
To expedite the start-up of this program, staff has contacted two agencies who have
recently gone out to bid on a street stenciling truck, namely the City of Moorpark and
the County of Riverside.
Staff analyzed the specifications from both the County of Riverside and the City of
Moorpark's bid package. Based upon this analysis, it was determined that the City
of Moorpark's specifications more closely met the City's needs.
In the past, the City has utilized bids received by other public agencies for purchases.
The furniture purchased for City Hall is an example.
The City of Moorpark received a total of three bids for this vehicle. One of the bids
was incomplete, and therefore disqualified. The low bidder was Roadline Products in
the amount of $45,024. The final bid, from Morton International totaled $52,354.
P,,..tNOJiTOz'~,t4GIF. t,~Ab'~5'2'NO.,GYP, AGN 08/0'Zt$~
Finally, the stenciling truck is a specially manufactured vehicle and staff is not aware
of any local manufacturer of this vehicle.
The total purchase price of this vehicle, including tax, is $45,024.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for the purchase of this vehicle
in the Public Works Department budget account no. 100-164-999-5608.
Z{.'U~IOJrI'ONI.,tAGENDA315Z'NCZ,GF~.AGN 08/02/~
ITEM NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 10, 1993
Consideration of Improvement Funding Agreement with Leo Roripaugh
and the County of Riverside for the Improvement of the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Channel and Grading of the Roripaugh Property adjacent to the
Channel
PREPARED BY.' Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Improvement Funding Agreement with Leo Roripaugh and
the County of Riverside and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on the City's
behalf and the City Clerk to attest to the same.
BACKGROUND:
Leo Roripaugh has applied for a grading permit to allow for the grading and excavation of Lots
I through 12 of Tract Map No. 20703-3 including the grading of Santa Gertrudis Creek
Channel.
Mr. Roripaugh wishes to utilize the $34,000 certificate of deposit (C.D.) currently being kept
by the City as security for said grading and an existing agreement with the City (see Exhibit
B) as the basis for this proposed agreement.
This new agreement will be between the City, Leo Roripaugh, and the County of Riverside.
It will allow for the County of Riverside to use the $34,000 C.D. as reimbursement for grading
done on the Roripaugh property by Assessment District 161 forces in conjunction with the
excavation of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel.
This agreement will allow Mr. Roripaugh to compensate the County of Riverside for the
private benefit associated with the proposed grading of his property with the same funds
being used for security for that grading.
-1 - pwOS\agdrpt~93%0810\improv.fnd 0729
The funds shall not be released by the City until such time as ell future public and precise
grading improvements are completed in accordance with the requirements of the Public Works
Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Entering into this agreement should have no fiscal impact to the City.
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A:
2. Exhibit B:
3. Exhibit C:
Description of the property
Certificate of deposit (copy) and Roripaugh Grading Agreement
Project Vicinity Map
-2- pwOS\agdrpt\93\O810%improv.fnd 0729
COUNTY ~F RIVERSIDE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 161
(Winchester Properties)
IMPROVEMENT FUNDING AGREEMENT
(RORIPAUGH PROPERTY)
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day
of 1993 by and among the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a
political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter
referred to as the "County"), the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal
corporation and public agency (hereinafter referred to as the
"City") and LEO RORIPAUGH, an individual, representing the legal
owners of the Property, as hereinafter defined (hereinafter
referred to as the "Landowner").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County has conducted proceedings for the
formation of an assessment district pursuant to the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 (the "Act"), being Division 12
(commencing with Section 10000) of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, designated Assessment District
No. 161 (Winchester Properties) of the County (the "Assessment
District") to finance the construction and acquisition of certain
public improvements specified in such proceedings (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, the Landowner is the owner of certain real
property situated in the City and within the boundaries of the
Assessment District, as described in and shown on Exhibit "A"
hereto (the "Property"),'which is subject to assessment for a
portion of the cost of the Improvements, and specifically the
improvement of the Santa'Gertrudis Creek Channel, to be
constructed to benefit the properties within the Assessment
District; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to provide for the. excavation
of fill dirt from the Property and placement thereof as necessary
for the construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel
together with related grading on the Property (the "Private
Work"); and
WHEREAS, the County has completed the issuance and sale
of Series B improvement bonds of the Assessment District which
includes the funding of the construction of the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Channel, and the necessary funds to complete the Santa
Gertrudis Creek Channel are now on deposit with the County; and
RORIFA. 6
WHEREAS, the Landowner and the City have entered into
an agreement entitled "Certificate of Deposit Agreement for
Grading" dated November 7, 1991 (the "Deposit Agreement"),
attached hereto as Exhibit "B", which agreement provides that
Landowner will deposit a Certificate of Deposit in the name of
the City in the amount of thirty four thousand dollars ($34,000)
and the parties wish to provide for the transfer of the Deposit,
upon improvement of the site in accordance with future approved
precise grading and private/public onsite improvement plans, to
the County to represent the cost of the Private Work which is not
a part of the Assessment District improvement cost; and
WHEREAS, the County is willing to proceed with the
bidding, award and construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek
Channel upon receipt of this Agreement, in executed form, and the
Deposit or an assignment or release thereof, in form acceptable
to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, the CITY OF
TEMECULA and LEO RORIPAUGH hereby agree as follows:
AG__REEME_NT
1. Recitals.
true and correct.
The above recital and each of them are
2. Governmental Permits: Other Actions. The
Landowner shall be required to obtain all permits and
entitlements required for the Private Work contemplated by this
Agreement pursuant to City ordinances and regulations. The City
will cooperate in the processing of all permits necessary to
allow construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel,
including but not limited to a grading permit, permits related to
Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat, the 404 permit and the 1603
permit. The Landowner will pay all fees of the City and the
County in connection with the grading of the Property; the City
will take whatever administrative steps are necessary to transfer
and/or release the Deposit to the County upon completion of the
future approved precise grading and private/public onsite
improvement plans pursuant to the grading permit.
3. Borrow Site; Site Preparation. The Landowner will
grant to the County the right to enter upon the Property for the
purpose of performing the Private Work. All excavation of dirt
from and grading on the Property shall be in accordance with the
Mass Grading Plan prepared by J.F. Davidson, the civil engineer
retained by and representing the Landowner (the "Mass Grading
Plan") delineating cut and fill areas.
4. Landowner Contribution. The County ~nd the
Landowner agree that the Deposit plus the value of the fill dirt
represents a fair payment for the grading performed as part of
RORTFA. 6 2
the Private Work and acknowledge the Deposit and the value of the
fill dirt as a contribution by the Landowner to offset the
Private Work performed as part of the contract to be entered into
for the construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel.
Additional grading required by storm runoff and maintenance to
the existing super-pad will be the responsibility of the
Landowner, providing such grading does not occur after the County
has determined the final topography of the site by aerial mapping
for the existing conditions. After establishing the topography
of the sitej the Landowner shall not further grade the Property
(except to protect it from erosion as provided in Section 5
herein) until the County contractor has completed excavation and
grading of material thereon pursuant to its contract with the
County as provided herein.
5. Placement of Dirt on Property; Erosion Control.
The County shall be responsible for the overexcavation and
compaction of dirt placed on the Property, as reco~f~Lended by the
consulting registered geologist retained by the County; the
Landowner shall be responsible for providing erosion control
facilities and/or measures necessary to protect the Property and
will be responsible for all SWPPP/NPDES requirements for the
Property.
6. Bidding of Advance Improvements; Construction.
Upon receipt, or assignment acceptable to the City, of the
Deposit, and completion of plans, specifications and contract
documents to the satisfaction of the County, the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Channel shall be offered for bid by the County in order to
obtain the lowest responsible bid per County public bidding
requirements; the County shall thereafter proceed to award said
work and provide inspection and funds control to insure
construction in compliance with the approved plans and specifi-
cations, the Mass Grading Plan and the City grading permit.
7. Indemnification. The Landowner hereby indemnifies
and holds'harmless the City and the County for all work done in
compliance with the Mass Grading Plan and assumes liability for
its own acts of negligence. The County hereby indemnifies and
holds the Landowner harmless for work performed by it or its
agents or assigns pursuant to this Agreement and assumes
liability for its own acts of negligence with regard thereto.
8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become
effective upon its delivery in executed formby the Landowner to
the County, and upon acceptance by the City Council of the City
and the Board of Supervisors of the County and execution by their
respective authorized designees.
9. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached
hereto and incorporated herein:
Exhibit "A" Description of the Property
RORIFA. 6 3
Exhibit "B"
Certificat~ of Deposit Agreement for Grading
10. General. This Agreement, incorporating the terms
of the Deposit Agreement, contains the entire agreement among the
parties with respect to the matters herein provided for, and may
only be amended by a subsequent written agreement executed by all
parties. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but which together, shall
constitute a single agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreement as of the date indicated above.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Attest:
By:
Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors
Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attest:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk
LEO RORIPAUGH
By:
Leo Roripaugh
RORIFA. 6 4
E.~.HIBiT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
P.~RCEL !:
ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 181, 182, 183 AND 184, APRICOT AVEN'UE.
BA~YA~YA STREET, AND H.~.'vIILTON A~NUE, OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND
WATER COMP.~.\TY, AS SHOWN BY MA.P ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 359 OF MAPS.
RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LYING NORTHERLY OF THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF NICOLAS ROAD. AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE BY DOCUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 19. 1978 AS INSTRL~IENT
NO. 267056, APRIL 2.3, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 80861 .~ND RE-RECORDED MAY
7, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 92671 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
EXCEPTING THEREFRO,N,[ THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF
THE FOLLOx,VING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HA~MILTON
.-~ AVENUE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED JULY 15,
1947 IN BOOK 842 PAGE 288 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 05' 29" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF
HA~MILTON AVENUE. A DISTANCE OF 261.21 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY
CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 184 CONVEYED TO LEO E.
RORIPAUGH, ET AL,. BY DEED FILED FOR-RECORD DECEMBER 27, 1945 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 3005, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 18' 29" EAST, (FORMERLY RECORDED SOUTH 76
DEGREES 26' EAST) ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL
CONVEYED TO LEO E. RORIPAUGH, ET AL A DISTANCE OF 317.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 56' 20" EAST, (FORMERLY RECORDED SOUTH 52
DEGREES 07' EAST) ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL
CONVEYI=-D TO LEO E. RORIPAUGH, ET AL,. A DISTANCE OF 945.26 FEET
(FORMERLY RECORDED 943.7 FEET) TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF
SAID PARCEL CONVEYED TO LEO RORIPAUGH, ET AL; SAID CORNER ALSO
BEING THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 183
CONVEYED TO LEO E. RORIPAUGH, ET AL BY DEED FILF-D FOR RECORD
DECEMBER 27, 1945 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3004, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNL~
THENCE SOUTH 68 DEGREES 58' 04" EAST, (FORMERLY RECORDED SOUTH 69
~'~DEGREES 28' 25" EAST) ALONG THE NORTF~ASTERLY LINE OF SAID LAST
j[ENTIONED PARCEL CONVEYED TO LEO E. RORIPAUGH, ET A,L, A DISTANCE
OF 1,411.97 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL SAID
CORNER BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID APRICOT STREET;
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFRONt Ti-ff~T PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO
THE COUNTY OF RI\,~RSIDE BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 3. 1991 AS
INSTRUNtENT NO. 184455 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RI~,'HERSiDE' COUNTY.
CALIFORNIA; '
,aJ_SO EXCEPTING THEREFROM T-HAT PORTION LYING WESTERLY OF THE
EASTERLY LINE OF WINCHESTER-TEMECULA ROAD AS CONVEYED TO THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 23. 1930 IN BOOK 722
PAGE 561 OF DEEDS, AND DEED RECORDED JULY 15, 1947 IN BOOK 842 PAGE
288 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. BOTH OF RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY.
CALIFORNIA. '
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 183 OF THE TEMECULA LAND A.ND WATER
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE TEMECULA R.4a'N'CHO, AS
SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 359 OF M.~d~S. RECORDS OF SK.N'
DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY TERNIINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE
DESCRIBED AS HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 68 DEGREES 58' 04" EAST .4a'4D
DISTANCE OF 1411.97 FEET IN THE AFORESAID QUITCL.-MM DEED TO LEO E.
RORLPAUGH AS TRUSTEES;
THENCE, ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 68 DEGREES 55' 53" EAST. 494.78 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 15' 19" WEST, 469.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE
OF AFORESAID BANANA STREET;
THENCE, ALONG THE CEN'TERLINE OF SAD BANANA STREET SOUTH 48
DEGREES 16' 44" WEST, 61.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ams',wpatl\tca~onp.imp~a:
I
· .S'J I'lL,7
../
EXHIBIT 'B'
Roripaugh Grading Agreement
&
Certification of Deposit
CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT AGREEMENT FOR GRADING
A .- WHEREAS, Leo Roripau~h ( hereinafter
designated as "Principal") has applied for a Grading Permit in
order to perform grading and' excavation on the following described
property: Lots 1 throuEh k2 as shown on the MaD of Tract f;20703-3 on file
in Book 186, Pa~es 20 throuzh 28 inclusive of Maps. Riverside County Records.;
follows:
WHEREAS, the conditions of this Agreement are as
(i)
That all work shall be done in compliance with
the City Grading Code and other applicable
laws, ordinances and regulations.
(2)
That all work shall be done in accordance with
approved plans and specifications and in
compliance with the terms and conditions of
said Grading Permit to the satisfaction of the
City~Engineer.
(3)
That until issuance of the certificate of
completion by the City Engineer, the Principal
shall perform all maintenance and comply with
all conditions required under said Permit, the'
Code, and all other applicable laws,
ordinances and regulations.
ENG\CERTDEP. FRM
(4)
That neither the City nor any officer,
employee or agent thereof shall be responsible
for any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done
by Principal under or in connection with any
works permitted under said Grading Permit. It
is also understood and agreed that Principal
shall fully indemnify, defend and hold City
harmless from any liability imposed for injury
(as defined in Government Code Section 810.8)
occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by Principal under or in
connection with-any work permitted under said
Grading Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the Principal and
the City of Temecula, by an through its City Engineer, as follows:
1. Concurrently with 'executing this Agreement, the
Principal will provide ~ Certificate of Deposit in the name of the
City of Temecula, Califor~ia for the sum of $34,000.00
2. The condition of this Certificate of Deposit is such
that the obligation shall become null and void of theabove-bounded.
Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors,
or assigns, shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly
ENG\CERTDEP. FRN
keep, and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions of this
Agreement.
3. In the event the Principal fails to comply with the
terms and conditions of the Grading Permit, the City may use the
Certificate of Deposit-to complete the work authorized by the
Permit, and to make the premises coveredby the Permit safe to life
and property to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Further,
the Principal will pay to the City of Temecula all costs and
expenses incurred by the City not otherwise covered by the
Certificate of Deposit.
4. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in
addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be
included costs and reasonable expenses and fees,. including
reasonable ~attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully
enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in
any judgment rendered.
5. The Prin6ipal hereby stipulates and agrees that no
change, extension of. time, alteration or addition to the terms of
said Grading Permit or to the work to be performed thereunder or
the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect
its obligations on this Agreement, and it does herebywaive notice-
of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to
the terms of said Grading Permit.
ENG\CERTDEP. FEN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
executed by the Principal on
this instrument
November 7
has
been duly
19 9Z .
CITY OF TEMECULA
PRINCIPAL
By: Tim Serlet
City Engineer
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SCOTT F. FIELD, City Attorney
By:
Leo Roripau~h ( Name )
(Title)
(ATTACH NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF R'I vers'j de -:
on November 7, 1991
said State, I~ersonally appeared Leo Roripauzh
,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
personally known to me (or proved to me on the bali of satis-
factory evidence) to be the person(s)whose name(s) i/are sub-
scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same.
BerCa B. Alexander
(This area for official notariN sea~
.: *
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT
NOT SUBJECTTO CHECK
EXHIBIT "C"
Vicinity Map
~ WINCHESTER.
"~m~r~r~\ CCLLECTION
84F hi %
85 ADAM CIR, 64, VIA MONTORO
6~ VIA MONSAR/iTE
66.~ TIMBERTREE CT,
· 67, CORTE RISA ~.
· 68, CORTE KALINA
69, CORTE GARBOSO
CAROLWOOD CI~
71, WHISPERING WIND CT,
72. OLD SPRINGS FID,
7'3. LONDON DR,
75, NOTTINGHILL RD,
76 BRAEWOOD C~
79. CALLE ESPANA
8G 8UFFY WY.
81, GORTE FLAMENCO
82, ATHENA LN, ~J3
8,3. MIMOSA DR. p
---- Project Site
FAU;ONPT
wy. G&*/LIN RD.
CT.
County
A~lmm. Ctr.
SOL
IEW
AVE N, CIMA
AUTO
bran/ ,' ~
L~
ME~SEY
Scenic
Viewpoin:
Temecula
City Hall
i ~o~
ZIP CODE
ument
I~rk
VILLA
VIII AGF'
PAUBA,,~
RO.
/,
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~~..
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
,~'~T' D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City
August 10, 1993
Engineer
Release Subdivision Monument Bond for Parcel Map No. 23335
PREPARED BY:/q~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the release of the subdivision Monument Bond for Parcel Map
No. 23335 and direct the City Clerk to release the bond to the surety.
BACKGROUND:
On September 24, 1991 the City Council approved Final Parcel Map No. 23335 and entered
into subdivision agreement with:
Bedford Development Company
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
for the installation of subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreement
was surety bond issued by:
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
Bond No. 3S 744 432 00 in the amount of $2,904.00 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
The subdivision monumentation has been completed in accordance with the approved parcel
map.
The inspection and verification process has been completed by City Staff, and the Public
Works Department recommends the acceptance of the work and exoneration of the
subdivision monumentation bond.
-1 - pw01%agdrpt~93%0810%23335 0810E
This development is a six (6) parcel commercial subdivision lying along the northerly frontage
of Winchester Road from Ynez Road to approximately 1325 feet easterly. While the project
was originally conditioned to construct the street improvements along its frontages, the
formation of the Winchester Properties Assessment District No. 161 relieved the developer
from the direct responsibility to either construct or bond for these street and related
improvements. Thus the only item to be bonded for was the subdivision monumentation.
The recommended City Council action does not accept the work performed or to be performed
by Assessment District No. 161 but exonerates the bonds and completes the contractual
obligation between the City of Temecula and the developer, Bedford Development Company.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
Vicinity Map
-2- pwO1~agdrpt~93~0810~23335 0810E
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of PlannJng
August 10, 1993
Status Report on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Listing of the California
Gnatcatcher as a Federally Threatened Species
Prepared by:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File:
BACKGROUND:
On March 25, 1993, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the California gnatcatcher
as a federally threatened species. This determination was made pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) and affords the gnatcatcher the protection of the ESA. The ESA prohibits
not only the "take" of the species, but also "harm" to the species. "Harm" includes
significant habitat modification or degradation which actually harms or harasses wildlife by
significantly impairing behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering.
Concurrent with the Listing of the gnatcatcher, the USFWS released the Draft Proposed
Special Rule to allow for the incidental take of the gnatcatcher. Under the proposed rule,
incidental take of the gnatcatcher would be limited to areas within a governmental jurisdiction
which is enrolled in the State Natural Communities Conservation Planning program (NCCP).
The failure to enroll in the program would preclude development of any land containing either
the species or its habitat.
The NCCP program was created by the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of
1991 (AB 2172). The purpose of NCCP is to provide for regional protection and perpetuation
of natural wildlife diversity while allowing compatible land use and appropriate development
and growth. The NCCP process is designed to provide an alternative to the current "single
species" conservation efforts by formulating regional, natural community-based habitat
protection programs to protect the numerous species inhabiting each of the targeted natural
communities.
The Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) and the Western Riverside
Council of Governments. (WRCOG) are currently working on the development of a multi-
species habitat conservation program (MSHCP). The first phase of the program focuses on
coastal sage scrub. A consulting biologist has been retained to document the distribution of
this habitat type in western Riverside County and to prepare the coastal sage scrub
component of the MSHCP plan. The RCHCA is also preparing a Long-Term' Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (K-rat). The long-term K-rat HCP will
the short-term K-rat HCP that has been in operation since !(90.
DISCUSSION:
It is the responsibility of the USFWS to enforce the federal ESA. The City is not required to
act as an enforcement agency of the ESA. However, the Planning Department has sent
notices to all persons whose projects have the potential to harm the species and/or its habitat.
The notices provided information about the Listing and recommended actions that people
might pursue to resolve any conflicts with their projects.
The County of Riverside and the RCHCA are currently negotiating jointly with the state on the
terms and conditions for enrollment into NCCP. The RCHCA hopes to include in the terms of
agreement for NCCP the acknowledgement of the federal and state resource agencies that the
Long-Term HCP and the MSHCP are acceptable mechanisms for implementing the NCCP
program in western Riverside County. Other negotiation points will be that the K-rat
mitigation fee be used for multi-species planning efforts and that the RCHCA member
agencies receive "credit" for the previously acquired habitat through the Short-Term HCP. If
the efforts of the RCHCA to enroll in the NCCP are unsuccessful, the City may need to enroll
independently in the NCCP. The City of Temecula is not presently enrolled in NCCP. The
issue of NCCP enrollment is expected to be before the Council in the Fall of this year.
Planning staff will keep the Council informed of ongoing developments in regards to this
matter.
2
ITEM
NO. 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Jeff Stone ~
August 3, 1993
Auto Mall Sign Public Hearing
As I will be on vacation from August 4 through August 13, I would like to ask you
to consider continuing the Public Hearing for the Auto Mall Sign to the meeting of
August 24. I believe this will be a controversial issue and would like to be present
when it is heard.
JS:ss
bcc: June Greek
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
August 10, 1993
Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2; Variance No. 13 - Temecula Valley Auto
Mall Marquee
PREPARED BY: Matthew Fagan
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 249, AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSTRUCT A
SEVENTY-THREE FOOT SIGN WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD ON
A PARCEL CONTAINING 5.07 ACRES LOCATED AT 26631 YNEZ ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-080-039
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 13 TO PERMIT A SEVENTY-THREE FOOT HIGH
SIGN IN THE SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-P-S) ZONE LOCATED AT
THE WESTERN PORTION OF 26631 YNEZ ROAD
BACKGROUND
Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 249, Amendment No. 2; Variance No. 13 - for the
Temecuta Valley Auto Mall Marquee was approved in concept by the City Council at their July
13, 1993 meeting by a 5-0 vote. Staff was directed by the Council to address design
considerations for the sign , working with a committee to include Councilmember Birdsall,
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs and two members of the Planning Commission and bring the item
back before the Council on August 10, 1993. Commissioner Ford and Commissioner
Chiniaeff were chosen for the committee at the July 19, 1993, Planning Commission meeting.
R:~S\STAFFRPT\249PP-2.CC 812193 tie
The committee met on July 28, 1993, to discuss potential designs for the sign. A consensus.
was reached in terms of a sign design which now depicts three hot-air balloons instead of one
(reference Attachment No. 4). In addition, the sign will now advertise the "Temecula Auto
Mall," not the "Temecula Valley Auto Mall." The height of the sign has remained at seventy-
three feet.
The applicant provided a copy of a letter from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) which
provides a conditional agreement of the sign construction (reference Attachment No. 5).
FISCAL IMPACT
The Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee is an approved project within the City of Temecula
Capital Improvement Program (Fiscal Years 1993-1997). Classified as a Priority I, total City
funding for the project is 9280,000, The source of the funds is the Redevelopment Agency.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Resolution No. 93- - Page 3
Resolution No. 93- - Page 9
Conditions of Approval - Page 12
Exhibits - Page 18
FAX to Ad Art from EMWD - Page 19
R:\S\STAFFII=q'~49PP-2.CC 812/93 tj$ 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S\STAFFRPT%249PP-2.CC 812193 th 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THY~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 249,
AMEND~ NO. 2 TO CONSTRUCT A SEVENTY-
TItR~-~', FOOT SIGN WITH AN ELECTRONIC MF~SAGE
BOARD ON A PARCEL CONTAINING $.07 ACRES
LOCATED AT 26631 YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS
· ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-080-039
WH'F.~, Ad Art Signs, Incorporated fried Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on June 7, 1993, at
which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heating, the Commission denied said
Plot Plan;
ItrltEREAS, Ad Art Signs, Inc. fried an Appeal of the Planning Commission' s decision
to deny Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside County Land
Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WltEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public heating pertaining to said Appeal on
July 13, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition to said Appeal; and
WI-W,~, the City Council continued said project at the July 13, 1993 meeting;
WHF_REAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on
August 10, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition to said Plot Plan;
WllEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Plot
Plan;
R:\S%STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 812193 tj~ 4
NOW, Ti~REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of 'state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the pwposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a prepaxation of the general
2. The City Council finds, in appmving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each of the following:
R:~S%STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 8/2/93 tie 5
a. There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment
No. 2 as proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied
or which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is litfie or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following
findings can be made:
1. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and
with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general weftare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property.
E. The City Council, in approving the proposed Plot Plan, makes the following
findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No.
2 will be consistent with the City' s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the proposed sign is consistent with
the existing Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S) zoning. Signage (on-site) is a permitted use
provided a plot plan has been approved. The Draft Land Use Designation for the project site
is Service Commercial (SC). Section IV. A.2.d. of the Land Use Element includes auto
dealerships as a "typical use" for the zone, and signage is a necessary component associated with
this use. It is likely that the signage will be consistent with the future General Plan due to the
fact that it is consistent with existing zoning and the typical uses permitted in the Service
Commercial land use designation.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due
to the fact that the proposed signage is consistent with the existing (Scenic Highway
Commercial) zoning, the Draft Land Use Designation of Service Commercial and the permitted
uses of the surrounding area. It is likely that the signage will be consistent with the future
General Plan due to the fact that it is consistent with existing zoning and the typical uses
permitted in the Service Commercial land use designation. Commercial uses exist within
proximity of the site and are also proposed to be located within the subject project area, each
of which include on-site signage.
R:%S%STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 812193 tie 6
3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws,
due to the fact that the proposed use complies with Sections 9.53 (Development Standards for
the C-P-S Zone), 18.27 (Variances), and 18.30 (Plot Plans) of Ordinance No. 348.
4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or weftare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures
for impacts identified in the initial study for the project.
5. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area,
due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Surrounding
property owners have expressed their satisfaction with the proposed signage. In addition,
potential signage for each individual dealership along Interstate 15 could equal or exceed the
amount of signage proposed for the auto mall marquee.
6. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built
or natural environment as determined in the Initial Study prepaxetl for Hot Plan No. 249,
Amendment No. 2.
7. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they
are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed
project. The proposed sign is located over an existing Eastern Municipal Water District
(EMWD) easement. EMWD has provided conditional agreement of the sign construction over
their easement.
8. Said findings are supported by exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and
a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby recommends
approval of Variance No. 13 for the erection of a seventy-three (73) foot high sign with an
electronic message board, located in the Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S) Zone, at the
western .portion of Toyota of Temecula (26631 Ynez Road).
A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:~S%STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 812193 tj= 7
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVE]) AND ADOPTED this 10th day of August, 1993.
SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I FrFREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing, Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of
,199_ by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CH-MEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~g-gK
CITY CLERK
R:~S\STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC Sl2193 tie 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~S~STAFFRFT~249PP-2.CC 812/93 tie 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TBY~ CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 13 TO
PERMIT A SEVENTY-THREE FOOT HIGH SIGN IN ~
SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-P-S) ZONE
LOCAT~.D AT T~E WESTERN FORTION OF 26631 YNEZ
ROAD
WHEREAS, Ad Art Signs, Incorporated fried Variance No. 13 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Variance application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Variance on June 7, 1993, at
which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHE~, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied said
Variance;
VVtrF~, Ad Art Signs, Inc. fried an Appeal of the Planning Commission' s decision
to deny Variance No. 13 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WItEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
~REAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
July 13, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition to said Appeal; and
WtIF~REAS, the City Council continued said project at the July 13, 1993 meeting;
WI~ERI~.~.S, the City Council conducted a'public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on
August ~0, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition to said Variance;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the
Variance;
R:~S~STAFFRF~249PP-2.CC 8/2193 tj~ 10
NOW, TI:rF, REFORE, Ti:ff, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Seaion 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Cede Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the' city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of 'state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency fmds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. Them is a reasonable pwbability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. Them is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed Variance is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Cede, to wit:
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
2. The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each of the following:
R:~S\STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 812/93 tj~ 11
a. Them is reasonable probability that Variance No. 13 as proposed
will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b. Them is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The prOposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.27.d. of OrdinanceNo. 348, no Variance may beapproved
unless the applicant demonstrates the adjustment does not constitute a grant of special privileges
that is inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which
the property is situated, and the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
weftare of the community.
E. The City Council, in approving the proposed Variance, makes the foilowing
findings, to wit:
1. The adjustment does not constitute a grant of special privileges that is
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the
property is situated. The sign is considered on-site due to the fact that it is located within the
Temecuh Valley Auto Mall. Curren~y, there are eight (8) auto dealerships contained within
the auto mall and more are anticipated within the area. Cumulatively, signage permitted for
each individual dealership under Ordinance No. 348 .could equal and possibly exceed the nmount
of signage proposed for the auto mall marquee. Freeway exposure of the auto mall is limited
due to the location of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall (approximately mid-way between Rancho
California and Winchester Roads). The marquee wffi serve to identify the approximate site of
the auto mall to passing motorists.
2. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws,
due to the fact that the proposed use complies with Section 18.27 (Variances) of Ordinance No.
348. The use is expressly authorized in the C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) zone.
3. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and weftare
of the community. An initial study was conducted for the project and a Negative Declaration
with mitigation measures is recommended for the project. In addition, the cumulative impact
of individual signage will be mitigated through the utilization of one collective sign for all
automobile dealerships.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Variance proposed is compatible with
the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and
a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
R:\S\STAFFRPT%249PP-2.CC 8/2/93 tie I 2
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVI~D AND ADOPTED this 10th day of August, 1993.
J. SAL MI/F~IOZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I F[ERF, RY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
, 199__ by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~h'I:IK
CITY CLERK
R:\S\STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 8/2/93 tjs 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S~STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 812193 tie 14
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2
Project Description: A two (2) sided, seventy-three (73) foot high sign with electronic
message board for the Temecula Valley Auto Mall located at the rear portion of Toyota
of Temecula (26631 Ynez Road)
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-080-039
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL
Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2 is a proposal for a two (2) sided seventy-three
(73) foot high sign with electronic message board for the Temecula Valley Auto Mall.
Hours of Operation shall be limited to between sunrise and 11:00 pm daily· Only those
dealerships contained within the Temecula Valley Auto Mall may advertise on the
electronic message board.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify
the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or
hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval·
e
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2 marked Exhibit D, or as amended by these
conditions.
5. Elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit E.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~249PP-2.CC 8~2~93 tie 15
Colors used in the construction of the sign shall be in substantial conformance with
those shown on Exhibit F (color rendering) and those listed on Exhibit G.
7. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any use allowed by this permit.
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT:
e
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Three
Hundred Dollars (81,300.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty
Dollars (81,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollar (850.00) County administrative fee to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code
Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48)
hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the
check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by
reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
All members of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall who chose to advertise on the
electronic message board portion of the sign shall submit an agreement with the City
of Temecula which will be recorded with the County Recorder. The agreement shall
stipulate that all members and future members will forego requesting any additional
freeway oriented signage as long as the Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee is
erected. The addition of any future advertisers on the electronic message board of the
Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee will cause the agreement to be amended. No
additional advertisers will be permitted to be displayed upon the Marquee until the
amended agreement is recorded.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
10.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting
shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
11.
Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) shall approve the footing design allowing for
the continuing operation and maintenance of the sewer facility in the proposed sign
location.
12.
The applicant shall record an agreement with EMWD regarding operation and
maintenance of the sewer facility. Said agreement shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works.
R:~S\STAFFRFT~249PP-2.CC 812/93 tje 16
OTHER AGENCIES
13. The applicant shall comply with the provisions set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water
District's transmittal dated June 2, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\S%STAFFRPT~249PP-2,CC 812/93 tie 17
lastera ,TV[unicipal ater District
Ju-~e 2, 3.993
G~TY OF TEMEC~LA;~ 2
Meq C Irahe
HafT, hew Fagan, Assistant Planner
City oZ Temecula
Planning Department
43174 BUsiness Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SubjeCt: P.P. 249, Amendment No. 2/Variance No. 13
Ternsouls Auto Mall Marquee
Dear Mr. Fagan:
The Dletrtct,s Engineering Department has been in contact with
Mart Signs Inc,. regarding deslgn revisions to the' mazelust.
The District objects to T.he subject project design which indicates
the marquee would intrude into the Dietricers sewer easement and
present definite maintenance rela~ad Problems to the District.
Therefore, the Dts~a~tct,s oondttlone of approval for the subject
Very Truly Yours,
MUN~fater Dlstrtct
David S, Oreslay
Senior Fnglneer
AS 93-588 ,
DGC/rh
CC:
~oe Van Sickle
John Pender~
Victor Barrate
Carl Drucke
To: Posc ~ Box 8500 , SanJacm~ Cxlixrorn/a 92~81-8500 . Telephone (909) 92~-7676 .Psx (909) 929-0257
Off'e: 2045 S. San./ec~mo Aveme, Sen./ec~am . Cuesmet Sen, ice/]~niineer/n8 Annet ,i.10 E Oekkml Awesme./4eme~ CA
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\S\STAFFRFT~249PP-2.CC 812/93 tie 18
0
i2/F IN~: IIJ-c41vl. H-/koH F~r--/-,tff ~/e.,
IN'l: I/4~al."~l. Lq~ c./.-~51~"
/ / ,
p-hip YI~IA/
EXHIBIT E
O IIBIHX=J
o
n
z
!:1 !]i
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
FAX TO AD ART, INCORPORATED FROM EMWD
R:%S\STAFFRPT%249PP-2,CC 8/2/93 tie 19
Eastern Municipal Water District
~d~ Shetdlt
RoOere M, COX
Chester C. Gilbert, Premcient
We. G- Aidridge, Vies Peasin
Crag A. Weaver
Mi~on V. AI~ey
Roeger D, 2ieme
Mary C. White
Please deliver the following page(e) tO:
NAME:
FIRM:
CITY:
FAX NUMBER:
s oral number of pages'sent (including this cover letter):
Please Review and Call
Per Your Request
For Your Information
If you do not receive the total number of pages sent (see above), Rleese call back ~,s soon as_ nr, ss(bls
(909) 766-1810 '-
(Name)
We are transmitting from:
Facsimile (FAX) Number:
DATE:
Business Phone
FAX Operator
xerox 7021 Telecopler
(909) 658-1803
j:t,,WO~O~WI~IWI~MMJ~NEXFA.
TV[all To: Post Office Box 8300 · San Jacinto, Cailrornis 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 'e Fu (909) 929-025"7
,%lain Office: 2045 S. Sun Jacinro Street. San Jncinm · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oaklnnd Avenue. liemet.
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAtiE~
CITY ATTORNE
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/7'~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 10, 1993
Adoption of Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an Ordinance Entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90-04
REGARDING MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR SUBDIVISIONS.
BACKGROUND:
Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, adopted by the City upon incorporation in December 1989
pertains to the payment and use of area drainage fees for the construction of flood control
drainage facilities. Section 10.25 (J) provides for the amendment of the drainage plan area,
the required facilities, and the drainage fee in an adopted area drainage plan as determined by
the Board of Supervisors (Board).
Under the "Rules and Regulations for the Administration of Area Drainage Plans", ADP as
promulgated by the County and adopted by the Board by Resolution No 90-059, the fees were
revised January 23, 1990 by Amendment No 1. These rules also required "an update of the
plan at least every two years to reflect changes in conditions, inflationary or deflat!onary
trends, revised general or specific plans, and approved development and drainage plans which
will require changes in facility configuration cost estimates and drainage fees".
On January 8, 1991 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-02 adopting the Murrieta
Creek Area Drainage Plan, including Amendment No. 1, and the "Rules and Regulations for
Administration of Area Drainage Plans" as adopted and administered by the County of
Riverside.
The Board adopted new fees on April 6, 1993 which are the subject of the recommended
Ordinance.
The following table traces the ADP fee history for the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan from
the approximate time of City incorporation:
- 1 - %agd rpt%93%0810%adp
Subwatershed
Adopted Adopted Adopted
10-22-89 1/23/90 4-6-93
Wildomar
Murrieta Valley
Temecula Valley
Santa Gertrudis Valley
Warm Springs Valley
$2606/Acre $ 4462/acre $4592/acre
2096/Acre 3503/acre 3985/acre
932/acre 1970/acre 2291/acre
638/acre 1023/acre 1179/acre
297/acre 530/acre 677/acre
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District collects these fees for
both Cities and the unincorporated areas of Riverside County.
The fees will increase from $1,970.00 per acre to $2,291.00 per acre for the Temecula Valley
subwatershed and from $1,023.00 per acre to $1,179.00 per acre for the Santa Gertrudis
Valley subwatershed. Currently, the Riverside County Flood Control District can only impose
these fees over the unincorporated areas of the watershed until the City adopts the new fee
schedule. By adopting the amended ADP, the City will provide uniformity of payment of fees
over the watershed and allow the Area Drainage Plan to be fully implemented as proposed by
the Flood Control District.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 93-
Exhibit A: Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Map
Exhibit B: Riverside County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 93-100
(Amendment No. 2 to Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan)
Exhibit C: ADP Cost Summary
Exhibit D: Previous ADP Cost Summary
-2- \agdfpt%93\0810\adp
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
A1VIENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9004 REGARDING
MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR
SUBDIVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection J (10) of Section 10.25 of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 460 adopted by reference by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended
to read as follows:
A. Murrieta Creek ADP
1. Wildomar Subwatershed $4,952 per acre
2. Murrieta Valley Subwatershed $3,985 per acre
3. Temecula Valley Subwatershed $2,291 per acre
4. Santa Gemdis Valley
Subwatershed $1,179 per acre
5. Warm Springs Valley Subwatershed $ 677 per acre
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect sixty (60) days after
its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED, this day of August, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 93- __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of August, 1993, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the __ day of August, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5\ords~ 1 2
· '" '~' EXHIBIT'A
W
EXHIBIT B
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
Adopted April 6, 1993
Resolution No. 93-100
UDdatin~ ReQuirement - This amendment is prepared in accordance with Riverside
County Board of Supervisors Resolution No, 86-29 "Adopting Hurrieta Creek Area
Drainage Plan", which states in part:
"that the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
is directed to prepare an update of this plan at least every two years to
reflect changed conditions, inflationary or deflationary trends, revised
general or specific plans, and approved development and drainage plans
which will require changes in facility configuration cost estimates and
drainage fees."
Facility Changes - No changes have been made on the facilities since the
adoption of Amendment No. I in January 1990.
New Facilities - Murrieta Line F-3, Santa Gertrudis Channel, Wildomar Lateral
A are all 100% complete. Warm Springs Channel, Murrieta Line F-l, Wildomar
Channel and Wildomar Lateral C are all partially constructed.
Future Facilities - Lines F, D and E are presently being designed.
Recommendations - It is the District'~ recommendation that the Board revise
the drainage fees for the five subwatersheds to reflect inflationary trends in
construction and right of way cost. The increase in construction cost is
based upon new costin9 quantities using 1992 unit prices. Right of way cost
are based upon the recommendations of the County's Real Property Management
Division.
EXHIBIT C
Facility
M,W Murrieta
Creek Channel
M Santa Gert. Ch
MURRIETA
AMENDMENT 2
TABLE I
CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
COST SUMMARY
Santa
Wildomar Murrieta Temecula Gertrudis
Valley Valley Valley Valley
Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost
6,4i2,213 26,387,069 10,003,869 11,065,'186
M Warm Springs Ch.
M Line A
M Line C
M Line C-1
M Line D
M Line D-1
M Line E
M Line E-1
M Line E-2
M Line E-3
M Line E-4
M Line E-5
M Line F
M Line F-1
M Line F-2
M Line F-3
M Line G
M Line N
M Line J
M Line K
M Line L
M Line L-1
M Line M
M Line M-1
M Line N
2,975,792
403,635
2,587,109
283,451
536,366
114,376
288,803
84,884
4,134,481
1,720,108
110,171
591,012
1,412,416
486,549
1,611,457
675,847
759,655
60,787
176,591
94,869
610,736
583,306
$46,689,471
M Line P
M Hwy 79,Crossing
MR3 Crossing
W Wildomar Ch. 2,291,877
W Lateral A 668,804
W Lateral B 604,644
W Lateral B-1 312,225
W Lateral C 2,237,497
W Lateral C-1 303,424
W Line D 17,688
W Lateral E 600,122
W Lateral E-1 27,221
W Wildomar Ch. 255,229
Debris Basin
W Lateral A. 495,152
Debris Basin
Subarea
Totals $14,226,096
169,902
152,473
104,513
7,132,924
793,407
Warm Area
Springs Drainage
Valley Plan
Total Cost Total Cost
10,869,639 64,737,976
2,164,081
408,538
7,132,924
2,164,081
169,902
152,473
104,513
2,975,792
403,635
2,587,109
283,451
536,366
114,376
288,803
84,884
4,134,481
1,720,108
110,171
591,012
1,412,~~
486,[
1,611,457
675,847
759,655
60,787
176,591
94,869
610,736
583,306
408,538
793,407
2,291,877
668,804
604,644
312,225
2,237,497
303.424
17.688
600.122
27,221
255.229
495,152
$10,430,757
$18,991,517 $13,442,258
Grand Total $103,780,099
EXHIBIT C
AMENDMENT NO. 2
MURRIETA CREEK
AFLEA DRAINAGE PLAN
REVISED DRAINAGE FEES
The current drainage fees for the five sub-waterehede are:
Sub-Watershed Fee Percentage Applied Toward
Wildomar Valley
Murrieta Valley
Temecula Valley
Santa Gertrudis Valley
Warm Springs Valley
Local Major
Facilities Facilities
*M.C. *S.O.
$4952/acre 54.93% 45.07% 0
$4139/acre 43.48% 56.52% 0
$2291/acre 4.09% 95.91% 0
$1179/acre "4.18% 58.26% 37.56%
$ 677/acre 3.04% 80.86% 0
*~TC. = Murrieta Creek Channel
G. = Santa Gertrudis Channel
.S. = Warm Springs Channel
*W.S.
0
0
0
0
16.10%
ZS:mcv
adp7a
EXHIBIT D
AME~DMEXT 1
Tsw r I
t~JRRIE"TA CREEK AREA DKAINAGE PLAN
Facility
M,W Murrteta Creek Ch.
Santa Gertrudts Ch.
Warm Sprlngs Ch.
Line X
Line C
Line C-1
Line D
Line D-1
Line E
Line E-1
Line E-2
Line
Line E--~
Line
Line F
Line F-1
Line
Line F-3
Line G
Line H
Line J
Line K
Line L
Line L-1
Line M
Line
Line N
Line P
Hwy 79 Crossing
R3 Crossing
Wildcmar Channel
Lateral A
Lateral B
Lateral
Lateral C
Lateral C-1
Line D
Lateral E
Lateral E-1
Wildmar oh. Debris Basin
Lateral A Debris Basin
AI~SC
ll: ~eb
WlZdcmar
Valley
Total Cost
S5,515,000
2,093,000
6~9 000
~BN 000
2~6 000
2,330 000
2q2 000
1B, 000
a95 000
23, o0o
226 000
455,000
)brrteta
.Valley '
Total Cost
$22,69q ,000
1 ,'913,000
2,395,000
1138o000
gq
235,000
3,~5~ ,000
1,443,000
91,000
591,000
1,260,000
399,000
1,39q, 000
645,000
~ ~, 000
158,000
79,000
a188,000
q? 8,000
COST~RY (Prevtoub)
Santa
Temecula Certrudis
Valley Valley
Total Cost Total Cost
S8,60q,000 S8,698,000
7,132,000
lq7,000
12T,000
6q5, DO0
Warm Springs
ValXey
Total Cost
~8,O99,000
2,080,000
3qO,O00
Area Drainage
Plan
Total Cost
$53,610,000
7,132,000
2,080,000
lnT,O00
12/,000
8~,000
1,913,000
297,000
2,395,000
253,000
~38,000
235, OOO
3,451,000
1 ,q43,000
91 ,OOO
591,000
1,260 ,OOO
399,000
1,39q ,OOO
591,000
158,~
79, OOO
a~88,000
q?8,000
340,000
&q5,O00
2,093,000
669,000
q84, OOO
266,000
2,330,000
242,000
18 ,O00
496,000 '
23,000
455,000
$12,817,000 $39,522,C00 $8,9~4,000 $16,q75,000 $10,519,000 $88,297,000
Costs shown above inclt~e Construction (w/31% ~gineering, ~onttngencies and a~intstratlon) and Right or Way
costs. The letter preceding each line desi&~ation (M or W) refers to t,he appropriate Master Drainage Plan
(Hurtlena or Wildcmar) k~ere the preliminary design plms can be fou~d.
ITEM NO. I 1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
June S. Greek, City Clerk
August 10, 1993
Designation of Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Annual
Conference
RECOMMENDATION:
Designate a voting representative and an alternate.
BACKGROUND: Each year at the League Annual Conference the member cities are asked
to designate the voting delegate and alternate. Each city is entitled to one vote in matters
affecting municipal or League policy. The business meeting will be held on Tuesday, October
19, at 10:30 AM at the Moscone Convention Center. If it is not possible for a member of the
City Council to be present the Council may designate a city official who is attending the
conference.
I have attached the memorandum from the League's Executive Director which further
elaborates on the voting procedures.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Memorandum from Don Benninghoven, Executive Director
League of California Cities
JSG
R:~agendLq~i, OCCvete I
mira,
III
League of California Cities
1400 K STREET · SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 · {916) 444-5790
Ca,,,o,,~,a C,,,es JUly 13, 1993
To.'
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From:
Don Benninghoven, Executive Director
Re'.
Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference
This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Saturday, October 16 through Tuesday,
October 19 in San Frandsco. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the
General Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions.
Annual Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the
quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all
cities be represented at the Business Meeting on Tuesday, October 19, at 10:30 am. at the
Moseone Convention Center, Room 134-13S.
To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each City Council
should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Business
Meeting. The League Bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting
municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the
City Council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." If the Mayor or a member of the City --~
Council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one of these officials will be
designated as the voting delegate. However, if the City Council will not have a registered
delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these officials
should be designated the voting delegate or alternate.
Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form" to the Sacramento office of
the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Thursday, September ;30, 1993), so that
proper records may be established for the Conference. The voting delegate may pick up the
city's voting card at the designated Voting Card Table located in the League Registration Area,
If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Meeting, the voting
delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by
appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the
exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, the card may be exchanged at the "Voting Card" table
in the League registration area. At the Business Meeting, the "Voting Card" table where the
Credentials Committee will be seated, will be located in the front of the meeting room.
The voting procedures that will be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of
this memo. It is suggested that the Mayor and all Council Members from each city sit together
at the Business Meeting so that if amendments are considered there may be an opportunity to
exchange points of view and arrive at a consensus before each city's vote is cast.
Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciatot
If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 444-5790.
League of California Cities
Anmml Conference Voting Procedures
Each-member dry has a right to cast one vote on matten pertaining to League
policy.
To cast the city's vote a city official must have in his or her possession the city's
voting card and be registered .with the Credentials Committee.
Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an
alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the
Credentials Committee.
The voting delegate or alternate may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card
desk in the conference registration area,'
Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is
permitted.
If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the
voting delegate or alternate may pass-the voting card to another official from the
same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials
Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, exchanges may be
made at the "Voting Card" table in the League Registration Area. At the Business
Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card" table in the front of the
meeting room.
Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures.
Only the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials
Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who have left a sample
of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved.
In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city
official to vote at the Business Meeting.
L:Xpolicy\m\voteproc
t.~AGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
1993 ANNUAL CONFERENCE
VOTING DF-I.I~.CIAT!:. FORM
1. VOTING DEI-I~-GATE:
(NA~t~)
VOTING ALTERNATE:
(Trrt~)
('l'fl'L.i~)
ATTEST:
(NA~E)
Please Return To:
League of California Cities
1400 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
FAX: 916/444-8671
Not I ~ater Thnn Thursd~. S~ptember 30. 1993
1o kXpo~\m\~le, L!tt
ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ~~(
A'I'i'ORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
AUgust 10, 1993
Development Agreement No. 92-1 and Change of Zone No. 21 - Linfield
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a Negative Declaration for Development Agreement No. 92-1 and Change of
Zone No. 21 and read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 92-1
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE LINFIELD
SCHOOL FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD TO ENSURE THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING,
CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY, SKILLED NURSING, PERSONAL
CARE, A NINE HOLE PRIVATE GOLF COURSE AND DEDICATION
OF A 2.3 NET ACRE PARCEL TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
A SENIOR CENTER LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH
OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF THE TEMECULA
VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL.
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R
(RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF
RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY
HIGH SCHOOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
946-070-008.
R:%S\STAFFRPT'J. INFIELD,CC2 8/2/93 klb
BACKGROUND
The City Council intended to approve Development Agreement No. 92-1 and Change of Zone
No. 21 on the July 27, 1993 meeting. However the appropriate Ordinances were not
available, since the recommendation was for denial. Staff has prepared and included these
Ordinances for final approval.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 93-
2. Ordinance No. 93-
- Page 3
- Page 6
R:~S~STAFFRPT~LINFIELD.CC2 8/4193 Idb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
R:\S\STAFFRPT'~INFImD.CC2 8/2/93 Idb 3
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMRNT NO. 9~1 BETWEEN THY~ CITY OF
TEMECULA AND ~ LINFIF, LD SCHOOL FOR A TEN
YEAR PERIOD TO ENSURE ~ DEVEI -OPS~-NT OF TIlE
PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING, CONGREGATE CARE
FACILITY, SKIIJ.EI} NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A
NINE HOLE PRIVATE GOLF COURSE AND DEDICATION
OF A 2.3 NET ACRE PARCEL TO ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SENIOR CENTER LOCATED NORTH
OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD
AND EAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY I~flGH SCHOOL.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I:rI~RRy ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5, Development Agreement No.
92-1, the Development Agreement for the Lin~eld School site, a copy of which is on f~e with
the City Clerk, is hereby approve&
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said Development Agreement on
behalf of the City of Temecula after execution there of by all landowners listed therein, provided
all such landowners have executed said Development Agreement within 30 days after adoption
of this Ordinance.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall he in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this
Ordinance to he posted and published as required by law.
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~INFIELD.CC2 8/2/93 klb 7
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of August, 1993.
ATTEST:
j. SAL Mtr oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMEC~)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby c~rtify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its f~st reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of August, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of
, 199 by the following roll call vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JUNE S.
CITY CL~-RK
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
R:\S\STAFFRPT~LINFIELD.CC2 812/93 klb 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
R:~,S\STAFFRPT%LINFIELD.CC2 812/93 klb 6
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TI~IECULA, AIVI~NDING ~ OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY FOR ~ CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
21, CHANGING ~ ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL
RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH
OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD-AND EAST OF THE
TEME~ VAIJ~Y HIGH SCHOOL AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 946-070-008.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THY~ CITY OF TEMECUIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The zoning district as
shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning Map
for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to
time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning
Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 21
and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shah take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~LINFIELD.CC2 8/2/93 klb 4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 10th day of August, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SF_,AL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CTrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its fn-st reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of August, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of__,
1993 by the following roll call vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JUNE S. GI~-PiK
CITY CLERK
Scott F.Field
City Attorney
R:~,S\STAFFRPT%LINFIELD.CC2 8/2/93 klb 5
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD JULY 13, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was held on Tuesday,
July 13, 1993, 8:25 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by President Patricia H. Birdsall.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director Roberrs to approve Consent
Calendar Items No. I and No. 2.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: None
1. Minutes
1.1 Minutes of June 8, 1993;
2. Muni Financial Services Contract
2.1 Approve contract with Muni Financial Services to provide
administration services related to the TCSD rates and charges.
assessment
CSDMINO711 3193 -1 - 7/I 6/93
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
DISTRICT BUSINESS
JULY 13.1993
e
Rancho Del Sol Landscaoe Imorovements
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Director- Muf~oz recommended that the forty-six (46) property owners with the slope
areas in question be contacted to try and achieve voluntary compliance.
Community Services Director 'Nelson stated that he feels the only possible way to
improve the aesthetics of the slopes is for the City to install and maintain them.
Director Parks suggested that staff do a post-card survey of the affected property
owners.
It was moved by Director Mur~oz, seconded by Director Stone to refer this item back
to staff with direction that they develop a questionnaire or survey to seek input from
the residents and property owners involved.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Mui~oz, Parks, Roberts, 'Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: None
NaminQ of the Senior Center
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation to name the senior center the Old Town Temecula Senior Center.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS:
Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
CSDMN0711 3/83 -2- 7116193
JULY 13,1993
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Mur~oz to adjourn at 8:45 P.M. The
motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on
Tuesday, July 27, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temeculs Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
City Clerk June S. Greek
CSDMIN0711 3/93 -3- 7/1 6193
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL'
CITY ATTORNEY C~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
AUGUST 10, 1993
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RIVERTON
PARK (PROJECT NO. PW93-04CSD)
DON SPAGNOLO, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER - CAPITAL PROJECTS
Approve the plans and specifications and award a contract of 9312,000 to
Cunningham-Davis Corporation, for the construction of Riverton Park Project No.
PW93-04CSD and authorize the President to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of 931,200 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount, for a total budget
of 9343,200.
3. Relieve Valley Crest Landscape, Inc., of its apparent low bid, due to a clerical error.
BACKGROUND:
On November 24, 1992 the City Council approved the master plan for the Riverton Park Site,
authorized the preparation of construction documents and released a formal public bid for the
Riverton Park Site Project. The construction of Riverton Park includes grading, storm drains,
curbs, sidewalk, fences, park signs, landscaping, irrigation, picnic shelters, play equipment,
"play safe" rubber surface, and park furniture.
A total of ten (10) bids for the project were publicly opened on July 8, 1993. The bids
received were as follows:
1. Valley Crest Landscape, inc.
9305,820.00'
2. Cunningham - Davis Corporation
9312,000.00
3. John C. Ettlin 9317,000.00
la~agendms\r/vercoo.awd 072993
4. Sedcon Engineers, Contractors, Inc. $318,683.00
5. Terra - Cal Construction, Inc. $327,000.00
6. Bopark Enterprises, Inc. $327,207.00
7. Allied Sprinkler Company, inc. $332,263.00
8. Edmonson Construction Company $350,000.00
9. Marina Contractors, Inc. $355,000.00
10. Plaza Landscape, Inc. $357,000.00
* Valley Crest Landscape, Inc. intended to bid $332,820.00, but due to a clerical error in
addition, bid $305,820.00. Staff recommends that the Council relieve Valley Crest
Landscape, Inc., from their bid pursuant to Public Contract Code §5103 (which authorizes
relief from bid due to clerical error).
Staff has verified the contractor's license and references of the next lowest qualified bidder.
Although this contractor has not performed work previously with the City, they have worked
in the cities of Alhambra, Anaheim, Glendora and with the State of California with very
favorable results. Therefore, it is recommended that the construction contract for the
Riverton Park Project be awarded to Cunningham-Davis Corporation as the lowest qualified
bidder.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to complete this project including contingency is $343,200. The
budget for this project was approved in the Capital Improvement Program for FY 1994-98.
Sufficient Development Impact Fees are available to fund this project.
ls~altudaa~,ri~eJ'g~m.au~l 072~
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW93-O4CSD
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 10th day of August, 1993, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Cunningham-
Davis, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR.".
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1o8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW93-04CSD, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically
references in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard
Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and
promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the
American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW93-O4CSD. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(310) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the Plans and Specifications
of this Contract.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Plans or Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as-~
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contrac
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW93-O4CSD
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Three hundred
twelve thousand DOLLARS and 00 CENTS ($312,000.00), the total amount of the base
bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed fifty (50) working
days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS. On or about. the thirtieth (30th) day of the month next following the
commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to
ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the
work. Thereafter, on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the
work progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments
each month up to ninety percent (90%) of the previous payments, provided that the
CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of each preceding
month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a
one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shall
be made on demands drawn int .he manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate
signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has
been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated
in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments \on the Contract
price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
CONTRACT CA-2
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
925,000-975,000
9.75,000-9500,000
Over 9500,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
180 days 2%
One Year 1%
w
10.
Failure by the CONTRACTOR to take corrective action within twenty-four (24) hours after
personal or telephonic notice by the CITY on items affecting use of facility, safety, or
deficiencies will result in the CITY taking whatever corrective action it deems necessary.
All costs resulting from such action by the CITY will be deducted from the retention. The
amount of retention provided for herein shall not be deemed a limitation upon the
responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to carry out the terms of the Contract Documents
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars (91,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control 'of and without the fault or negligence of the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or
before making final request. for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall
submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract;
the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all
claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in
writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit,
release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post
a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates
as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
CONTRACT CA-3
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the--,
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of 925.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for eac
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
11.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Contractor shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City in
full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to
persons-or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives,
employees or subcontractors. Insurance iS to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating
of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid.
The Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum SCOpe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number
GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG
0001 ).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of
California an Employers' Liability insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less
than:
General Liability 91,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: 91,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' compensation as
required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability
limits of 91,000,000 per accident.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of 91,000 must
be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain
or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: ""'!
CONTRACT CA-4
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed
to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written
notice to the City via United States First Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability coverage. The City of Temecula
, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds
as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the
Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises
owned, occupied or used by the Contractor, or automobiles owned, lease,
hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Contractor's performance of the work
described in this contract, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance as respects the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees
and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Contractor's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees or
volunteers.
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom
claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall
agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Temecula , its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Contractor for the City.
CONTRACT CA-5
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates
of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for
each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer
to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provide ""
by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before wor,,
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies
of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or
shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverage for
subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees; or the Contractor shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of person,~-'---
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly o.
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of conditions
that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered
in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary
independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations
or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be accepted
as an excuse for any failure or omission on the pan of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill in every
detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any
claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other puerperal of the Drawings and Specifications for this project --,
CONTRACT CA-6
17.
18.
19.
CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the
CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project
for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit
covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under
the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR
Corporations:
The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and
Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may
sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate
board of directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Partnerships:
The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The
bid must be signed by all partners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of a
certified copy of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner
is presented to the City Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign.
Joint Ventures:
Bids submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer.
Individuals:
Bids submitted by individuals must be signed by the bidder, unless an up-to-date power of
attorney is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case said person may sign for the
individual.
The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition,
however, where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature.
SUBSTITUTED SECURITY. In accordance with Section 22300 of the Public Contracts
Cede, CONTRACTOR may substitute securities for any monies withheld by the CITY to
ensure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of the CONTRACTOR,
securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the CITY or with a State
or Federally chartered bank or an escrow agent who shall pay such monies to the
CONTRACTOR upon notification by CITY of CONTRACTOR's satisfactory completion of
the Contract. The type of securities deposited and the method of release shall be approved
by the City Attorney's office.
CONTRACT CA-7
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
RESOLLrrION OF CLAIMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shall
arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts Code.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge th~
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance
of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such pan thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject
to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
UTILITY LOCATION. CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility
facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate
regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4216.2.
TRENCH PROTECTION AND EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed
plan for worker protection during the excavation of trenches required by the scope of the
work in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705.
ao
CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing 'the condition, notify CITY in writing as
soon as CONTRACTOR, or any of CONTRACTOR's subcontractors, agents, or
employees have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the
following conditions:
The presence of any material that the CONTRACTOR believes is hazardous
waste, as defined in Section '25117 of the Health and Safety Code;
ii.
Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those
indicated in the specifications; or
111.
Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different
materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as
inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract.
Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken,
CONTRACTOR shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the
hazardous waste or physicai conditions from causing bodily injury to any person.
Ce
CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in the
exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or
do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the
CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any pan of the work,
then CITY shall issue a change order.
In the event of a dispute between CITY and CONTRACTOR as to whether theY"-
conditions materiaily differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease oi
CONTRACT CA-8
26.
27.
28.
29.
increase in the CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any
part of the work, CONTRACTOR shall not be excused from any scheduled completion
date, and shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract.
CONTRACTOR shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of
disputes and protests between the parties.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to
not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made
within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Don Spagnolo, Capital Projects/Principal Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROV'ED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA- l 0
ITEM NO. 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
AUGUST 10, 1993
ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR OPEN SPACE AREAS
"THE VILLAGES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION NO. TWO"
I~REPARED BY: .~
RECOMMENDi'i~O~N:
BERYL YASINOSKY, DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
That the Board of Directors:
Accept grant deed for two (2) mini-parks (Calle Aragon Park and Bahia Vista Park),
and open space areas within The Villages Community Association No. Two - Tracts
21672-2 through -4 and Tracts 21673-1 and -3.
DISCUSSION: The Villages Community Association No. Two originallyfiled
an application to dedicate open space areas to the CSA 143 for maintenance
purposes. On behalf of the newly incorporated City, CSA 143 reviewed and approved
the application to dedicate open space areas within the development in fee title.
As a result, the Villages Community Association No. Two has requested that the
TCSD accept the open space areas in fee title. Staff has reviewed these areas and
has determined that several of the open space areas will connect into the future trail
system proposed within the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the TCSD honor the previous approvals by CSA 143 and accept
fee title to the open space areas within this development.
The enclosed grant deed has been reviewed by staff to insure that legal requirements
have been satisfied. The slope landscaping has been inspected by our Maintenance
Superintendent and is acceptable to our standards. A copy of the site plan is attached
for your review.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs to maintain the park sites and slope areas
have been included within the TCSD Rates and Charges for FY 1993/94 - Community
Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service Level C.
ATTACHMENTS:
Site Map
Copy of Grant Deed
u f z ~.c~c~ # r 4~
UJ
t--
<
>
>
0
0
~>-
0
_J
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
City of Temecula
43174 Business' Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
The Villages Community AssOciation No, Two. a non-i)rofitr mtltt3~l
hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following
described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California:
See Exhibit "A" .=...if. ached hereto.
Executed on
California.
/"~ 3e/fema/greedeed 013192
~'of
~unty of
CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGO
APRIL 1, 1993
.rsonallyappeared
before me, }{RIDI ~.. T.ONG
(NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER - I.E., 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC')
}tAROLD D. METERS
Dersonally known to me - OR -
(NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S))
$
proved to me on'the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person~ whose name(,s'j' is/are sub-
scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged
to me that he/She/they executed the same in
his/bet/their authorized acity(ies), and that by
his/bert/their signaturef/)~n the instrument the
personpr)~, or the entity upon behalf of which the
personCs~'acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
mG~UMBPRI~(O~ONAL)
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SI6NER(S)
[] INDIVIDUAL(S)
I CORPORATE
OFFICER(S)
[] PARTNER(S) rrrr,~{s))
[] ATTORNEY IN FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
D OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTrrY(IES))
VILLAG~..S ASSOCIATION #2
(SEAL) (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY)
NTION NOTARY: The informat:on requested below is OPTIONAL It Could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized documenL
THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document G~N~
MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages 10 Date of Document
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
3RM 63240--ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWt. EDGMENT WffH SIGNER CAPACffY/REPRESENTATION/FINGERPRINT_Rev. 12-92
=1992WOLCOTrS FORMS. INC. ~. ~J
ATTEST:
By:
June S. Greek, City, Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
City of Temecula
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
013192
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On = before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State
of California, personally al~peared , personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the pers.qn(s), or the en.*.ity upon behalf ~f which th,-, person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above.
City of Temecula
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
June S. Greek, City, Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Scott F. Reid, City Attorney
013102
EXHIBIT "A"
The real property in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, described as:
1. Lot 48 of Tract 21672-2, as per map recorded in Book 183,
Pages 78 - 82, of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder
of Riverside County.
2. Lots 39, 40 & 41 of Tract 21672-3, as per map recorded in Book
186, Pages i - 5, of Maps, in the Office of the County
Recorder of Riverside County.
3. Lot 46 of Tract 21672-4, as per map recorded in Book 186,
Pages 6 - 9, of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside County·
4. Lot 44 of Tract 21673-1, as per map recorded in Book 177,
Pages 77 - 81, of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder
of Riverside County.
Lots 51 & 52 of Tract 21673-3, as per map recorded in Book
186, Pages 10 - 15, of Maps, in the Office of the County
Recorder of Riverside County.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGEN'CY
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD JULY 13, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, July 13, 1993, 11:35 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Ronald J. Parks.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs,
Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
1.
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1993;
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Mufioz to
approve the minutes of June 8, 1993 as mailed.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Parks
None
None
Mur~oz, Roberts, Stone,
RDAMIN07/13/93
Development and Disoosition Ac~reement - WaI-Mart
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
Agency Member Mu~oz expressed his concern that the action proposed may be in
violation of the RDA Settlement Agreement.
-1- 07/16/93
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JULY 13, 1993
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1
Approve the Development and Disposition Agreement between the
Agency, WaI-Mart and the agreement between the Agency and Rancho
Regional Shol~ping Center I~roviding for the ~90,000 reimbursement to
the Agency and authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the same.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Roberrs, Parks
NOES:
2 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Mur~oz, Stone
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Reconsider the Conditions of the Stioulated Judoement - Robert Dawes, Save Historic
Old Temecula. an Unincoroorated Association vs. The Redevelooment Agency of the
County of Riverside, et al.
Due to the lateness of the hour, Agency Member Birdsall moved to continue this item
for two to four weeks, seconded by Agency Member Stone.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Parks
None
None
Muf~oz, Roberts, Stone,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None
RDAMIN0711 3/93 -2- 07116/93
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JULY 13,1993
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Mur~oz to adjourn at
11:50 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City Of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, July 27, 1993, 8:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
City Clerk June S. Greek
RDAMIN0711 3/93 -3- 0711 6193
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Agency Members
Scott F. Field, General Counsel
August 10, 1993
$60,000,000 Limit on Expenditure of Tax Increment Revenue
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency members consider seeking an amendment to the
Stipulated Judgment in Dawes v. City of Temecula to raise or eliminate the limitation on the
use of tax increment revenues.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the stipulated judgment in Dawes v. City of Temecula. the
City and the Redevelopment Agency agreed that the Agency would not expend more than
$60,000,000 in tax increment revenue during. the life of the Redevelopment Plan. The
$60,000,000 limitation is exclusive of the cost of: (i) debt service (excluding repayment of
principal), (ii) low and moderate income housing set aside, (iii) pass through amounts to other
agencies, (iv) any amount paid to the County to settle the lawsuit and (v) an annual amount,
not exceeding $75,000, representing the cost of plan administration.
The procedure for amending the tax increment revenue limitation is set forth at Section
5 of the Stipulated Judgment. It requires the City to bring a Motion in Superior Court
demonstrating to the "reasonable satisfaction" of the Court that there has been a "change in
circumstance relating to the plan or its implementation" which requires a modification to the
tax increment revenue limitation.
The procedure for bringing this motion is fairly demanding. The principal requirement
is that all landowners, business owners and residents within the Plan Area must be provided
written notice of the proposed amendment. The cost of providing this notice will likely be
significant, probably in the $10,000 range. However, the Agency is inclined to bring the
Motion, a more careful estimate can be prepared of the cost of bringing the motion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To be determined.
ATTACHMENTS:
Section 5 of the Stipulated Judgment.
5~e,d-.q~t~ex!~-ad
-1-0
conducted within said thirty ( 30 ) day
period. Each such approved Committee report
shall be referred directly to the City counci~
and/or Agency' Board as a part of the staff
report submitted to that body for consider-
ation and approval of the Redevelopmen=
Activity involved. Prior to acting on any
such Redevelopmen= Activity, the City Council
and/or Agency Board shall consider the report
of the Committee therein. If, for any reason,
the Committee fails to adopt any written
report on any Redevelopmen= Activity referred
to it, within the said thirty (30) day period,
the City Council and/or the Agency Board may
proceed, without further review by the
Committee, to act on the Redevelopmen~
A~tivity in question. All a~tions by the City
Council and/or Agency Board on Redevelopmen=
Activity shall be final and conclusive.
4. The Agency shall not loan Tax Increment Revenues =0
any person, except where interest thereon is charged, at a rate
not less than prime plus ~wo percent (2%); for the purpose=of
this subsection, H.4., wprime" shall mean the average of the
prime rate of interest, quoted by sll banks located in ~he City,
as of the date of making of any such loan; and
5. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the
contrary, neither this Judgment nor the Redevelopmen= Plan shall~
-16-
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
94
26
27
28
be modified so as to provide for: (a) the exercise of the power
of eminent domain by the Agency by the acquisition of any
properties located within the boundaries of 01d Town, for the
purpose of conveying such properties to private parties for
redevelopment purposes; or (b) the extension of the life of the
Redevelopment Plan; or (c) an increase in the amount of Tax
Increment Revenue permitted to be received by the Agency pursuant
to the Plan and this Judgment, unless and until the City and/or
the Agency files a noticed motion in this Court, demonstrating
therein, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Court, that there
has been a change in circumstance relating to the Redevelopment
Plan and/or its implementation, which requires such amendment.
The filing of a motion contemplated by this Section
H.5., shall be the responsibility of the Agency. In addition to
the notice required pursuant to the then applicable Superior
Court Rules with reference =o motions, the Agency shall give
sixty (60) days written notice of the pendency of such motion,
which notice shall include a brief statement of the nature and
purpose of the motion, to the owner of each parcel of real
property located within the Plan area; to each person who is
licensed by the City to conduct a business in Old Town; and ~o
any person who resides in Old Town; "Owner" as used heroin shall
mean each person whose name appears on the latest equalized
assessment tax roll as the owner of each such property. The
written notice to owners shall be given by depositing the same in
the custody of the United States Postal Service, or i~s lawful
successor, first class postage prepaid, addressed to the person
to be notified, at his/her last known address. In addition, the
-17-
~/'J6/9~
1
8
11
15
18
28
Agency shall give published notice of the pendency of such motion
not less than ninety (90) days in advance of the date set for
hearing of such motion. Published notice as required herein
shallbe given in a newspaper adjudicated ae a newspaper general
circulation in the Clty~ or, if there is none, then in such
newspaper as is determined by the Agency to have a wide enough
circulation to give reasonable notice of the pendency of such
hearing. "Change in circumstance" as used in this subsection,
H.5., shall be defined to mean those legal and/or e~ui=able
principles utilized by courts tO determine whether a change in
circumstances exist where jurisdiction has been retained to
monitor Judgments; and
6. All persons are hereby permanently enjoined from
the institution of any action or proceeding raising any issue as
to vhich this Judgment is binding and conclusive; and
/
7. 'This Judgment be forever binding and conclusive
upon all persons as to all matters heroin adjudicated and all
matters vh~ch could have been adjudicated in this proceeding; and
S. The Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment.
Dated this~day of ~. , 1991.
: . ,~!C: %AF!. KAISE~
Judge of the Superior Court..
-18-