HomeMy WebLinkAbout110496 PC AgendaCALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
.:.. ~.'
Fahey, Miller, Slaven:' S'oltysiak and Webster
:"'= ~': :';::~:!: ::!~=!i!!'ii;~?=~: :!:~: :~!~ '~: :'!! "'! '! :'~:= ~::::~:~ '!~:!:i~ =
not lis~ on ~e Ag~. S~rs a~ limi~ ~ ~e (3) ~nu~s ~ch. If
Commis~o~ a~ ~c A~, a pink out
a~ fil~ wi~ ~e ~.
When you are
For all other
Commission
filed with lhe Planning Sec.~'etary before
~" time limit for individual speakers.
r:...th,e.:~!ntta'seeti,m or
PUBI.IC HEARING ITEMS
Case N0:
Applicant:
Location:
PropoSal:
Environmental Action:
Planner: . .
RecOmmendation:
Cose No:
App!i~ant:
.: Location;
P~opbsa. h
"' :,,.' ~-;'~,~,r~." ;, ':'..~.
' . City-Vfide Design Guidelines
'~i~' ~Ov'-l of comiO~rcial, i~d~strial and residential
di:'~Hnpn~ent in Temecula. They will be used to provide direction
to pe, rsom' in the .devebpmeat community with the minimum
· ' ': .- . development standards in the City.
.. EnVii~ohmental~Actien: .. . EXempt ' ' '. .... '-' :*'
*Pk,;.,i~,~i. ~.. ::"...C.d~ ~ui~
RecommendatiOt~: Recommend Approval to the City Council
CONTL%~_,D FRO~,! OCTOBER 7, 1~
PLANNING MANAGIM~ RE~ORT
OTHER
Next meeting:
Regular Plnnning Commi.~fion Meeting.
P ~L
ITEM #2
lVlEIVIORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
~l~b~gUbC~2~ng Manager
DATE:
November 4, 1996
SUBJECT:
Status of landscaping for Unocal (southeast comer of Rancho California Road
and Front Street) and Timing of Traffic Signal at the intersection of Margarita
Road and Solana Way
At the October 21, 1996 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission requested Staff
provide the status of the landscaping for Unocal (located at the southeast comer of Rancho
California Road and Front Street) and the Timing of Traffic Signal at the intersection of
Margarita Road and Solana Way. The status of these items are discussed below.
L~ndscaping for Unocal
Landscaping has been installed for the project per the landscape plans approved by the
Planning Commission. During the construction of the project, the contractor mistakenly
deleted four feet of landscaping along the Front Street frontage. They were informed to
rectify this situation. Because this error was detected after much of the hardscape had been
installed, Staff allowed them to ereate the retaining wall along Front Street. This allowad
them to rupture the four feet of landscaping which was lost due to the error.
Timing of Traffic Signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way
The preliminary design for the signal has been completed and the final design is underway.
The signal is expected to be in operation in'February, 1997.
ITEM #3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
November 4, 1996
Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for Payless Drug Store located at
31797 Highway 79 South
Prepared by:
Craig Ruiz, Assistant Planner
EXISTING ZONING:
Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Highway Tourist Commercial/Professional Office (HTC\O)
Open Space (OS)
Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC)
Medium Density Residential (M)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Highway Tourist Commercial/Professional Office (HTC\O)
Open Space (OS)
Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC)
Medium Density Residential (M)
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission make a finding of public convenience or
necessity for their business. The finding is required because the applicant is requesting a
license from the California Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The business is a drug store that
will sell alcohol for off-site consumption. The drug store will be located in the Vail Ranch
Commercial Center that is currently under construction.
ANALYSIS
The Planning Commission has developed criteria to either justify or not justify making a finding
of Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant to State Law. These criteria and Staff's
preliminary responses are found below.
Criteria to Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessitv
Q.
Does the proposed establishment have anyunique features which are not found in other
similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other special
services)?
No.
Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a
different socio-economic class)?
No.
Does the proposed establishment provide entertainment that would fill a niche in the
community (i.e. a comedy club, jazz club, etc.)
No.
Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in
conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other
establishments in the area?
No.
Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e.
freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from
other establishments?
Yes. The project is bordered by Temecula Creek which provides a physical barrier for
the residents of Redhawk to the south. Highway 79 South provides a traffic barrier to
the north. The license would be a convenience to residents to the south and west who
would not be required to enter or cross the Highway.
Q;
Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of
population during certain seasonal periods?
No.
Criteria to Not Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the proposed
establishment?
No. Currently there is one (1) licensed establishment within a quarter mile of the
proposed establishment. However, the Commission has previously made findings of
public necessity for two other businesses located within this center, Albertson's and
Chevron. Neither of these businesses have yet to be constructed.
Q;
Are there any sensitive uses (i.e., schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity
(600 feet) to the proposed establishment?
No.
Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses?
No.
R:~STAFFRFI~pAyI~S,~.ALC 10/30/96cgr 2
Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property
by the residents of the area?
No. There is a residential development adjacent to the shopping center. However, this
development is a gated community and it is not anticipated that the residents would be
impacted by this use.
Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area?
No. Staff contacted the Temecula Police Department regarding the proposed liquor
license. Based upon our conversation with the Police Department, the proposed
establishment will not add to law enforcement problems in the area.
Number of similar uses within the City
There are two (2) other drug stores within the City that also offer alcohol sales (Sav On and
Long's Drug Store).
Number of other licensed establishments within 1 mile and 3 miles
There is one (1) licensed establishments within one (1) mile of the subject establishment. This
licensed establishments is a gas station with beer and wine sales. There are 21 licensed
establishments within a three (3) mile radius of the subject establishment which include
restaurants, nightclubs, bars, mini-marts and grocery stores.
Conclusion
Staff recommends the Commission review the information included in this report and make the
appropriate finding.
Attachments:
Exhibits - Blue Page 4
A. Vicinity Map, including 1/4 mile radius
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
EXHIBITS
CITY OF TEMECULA
LCASE NUMBER: N/A
~,XI-IrRIT- A
~'LANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA
LM
CO
\_
BP
\
/. /" LM · LM
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
EXHIBIT C o GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION -COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
CASE NUMBER: N/A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4,
ITEM #4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commissi~D~
Debbie Ubnoske,f~lanning Manager
DATE:
November 4, 1996
SUBJECT:
Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for Rustler's, Inc. (The Beach
Club) located at 27780 Front Street
Prepared by:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
EXISTING ZONING:
Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Community Commercial (CC)
South: Service Commercial (SC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Community Commercial (CC)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS:
North: Community Commercial (CC)
South: Service Commercial (SC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Community Commercial (CC)
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission make a public convenience or necessity
finding for their business. The finding is required because the applicant is requesting a new
type of license from the California Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Previously the applicant
had received a license from ABC as a bonafide restaurant; however it has been determined they
do not meet the food requirements under their previous license. Since it has been determined
they no longer fall within this category, they are requesting a Type 48 (on-sale General Public
Premises) license. This license is to serve alcohol to patrons over 21 years in age. Under the
current ownership, the facility has been operating for four (4) years.
ANALYSIS
The Planning Commission has developed criteria to either justify or not justify making a finding
of Public Convenience or Necessity pursuant to State Law. These criteria and Staff's
preliminary responses are found below.
Criteria to Justifv Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessitv
Q;
Does the proposed establishment have any unique features which are not found in other
similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other special
services)?
No.
Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a
different socio-economic class)?
No.
Does the proposed establishment provide entertainment that would fill a niche in the
community (i.e. a comedy club, jazz club, etc.)
The establishment provides live musical entertainment on Friday and Saturday.
According to the current owner, he will be attempting to feature nationally known
artists at the facility in the near future. Two (2) other establishments offer regular live
entertainment in the community (Sefior Shakespeare's and the Temecula Stampede).
Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in
conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other
establishments in the area?
No.
Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e.
freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from
other establishments?
No.
Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of
population during certain seasonal periods?
No.
Criteria to Not Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the proposed
establishment?
Currently there are seven (7) licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the
proposed establishment. All seven licensed establishments are located to the west of
I-15 and the establishment is the only bar/nightclub within the quarter mile.
Are there any sensitive uses (i.e., schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity
(600 feet) to the proposed establishment?
One sensitive use is located within 600 feet of the proposed establishment. A church
facility is located in the building immediately to the south of the subject establishment.
The church is open on Sunday mornings and on Thursday evenings. The bar has been
located in the area longer than the church facility.
Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses?
It is unlikely that the proposed establishment will interfere with the sensitive use. The
only time for potential conflict is Thursday evening and it is anticipated that the church
facility will not be in operation at the peak demand time for the proposed establishment.
Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property
by the residents of the area?
No. There are no residences in the area.
Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area?
Staff contacted the Temecula Police Department regarding the proposed liquor license.
Based upon our conversation with the Police Department, the proposed establishment
will not add to law enforcement problems in the area. The change of license is not likely
to have an impact to law enforcement.
Number of similar uses within the City
Approximately two (2) other establishments also offer regular live entertainment in the
community (Sefior Shakespeare's and the Temecula Stampede).
Number of other licensed establishments within 1 mile and 3 miles
There are sixty-one (61) licensed establishments within one (1) mile of the subject
establishment. These licensed establishments include restaurants, nightclubs, bars, mini-marts
and grocery stores. The three mile radius encompasses the reminder of the licensed
establishments within the City of Temecula.
Conclusion
Staff recommends the Commission review the information included in this report and make the
appropriate finding.
Attachments:
Exhibits - Blue Page 4
A. Vicinity Map, including 1/4 mile radius
B. General Plan Map
C Zoning Map
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
EXHIBITS
R:~TAFFRFI~BAJA.ALC 10/30/96mf 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NUMI}ER: N/A
~XIHRIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4, 1996
CITY OF TE~IECULA
m
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
~P
CC 0
BP
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION -COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
CASE NUMBER: N/A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4, 1996
CC CC '~
r'. H /P
ITEM #5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
November 4, 1996
Consideration of an Ordinance for the City of Temecula Amending the
Development Code to Create Provisions and Requirements for the Approval of
Master Development Plans
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide Direction on the Establishment of an Ordinance for the City of Temecula Amending the
Development Code to Create Provisions and Requirements for the Approval of Master
Development Plans for Industrial Projects
BACKGROUND
In early 1996, the City of Temecula met with Snyder Langston to discuss a public\private
partnership with the goal of developing an industrial facility plan dedicated to providing
designed and approved facilities for users than have a desire to locate within the boundaries
of a planned industrial park in the City.
Snyder Langston is a company which has a reputation as a Manager and Builder of
distinguished public and private developments in Southern California. Snyder Langston will
work with MacHutchin Development to form the "Development Team" for the express goal of
planning and developing industrial facilities for qualified firms having a need for those facilities
in the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula will provide the 'Development Team" the
necessary governmental approvals to accelerate the final permit process. The "Development
Team" will provide for the marketing and design required to obtain approval for the Master
Development Plan on a non site specific industrial project, as well as, financing and
construction. The City of Temecula will provide the planning review, plan check, and all other
necessary governmental reviews for the project to allow for the approval.
The "Development Team" proposes to initially submit schematic design drawings and elevations
for a prototype industrial project of approximately 50,000 square feet. A site plan and
elevations are provided in your packet.
A representative of Snyder Langston will make a brief presentation at the Planning Commission
meeting of November 4, 1996
MASTER
DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSAL
SNYD6R IJ~NGSTQN
PROPOSAL FOR PREAPPROVED INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
OBJECTIVE:
Develop a industrial facility plan specifically dedicated to providing designed
and approved facilities for "Users" that have a desire to locate within the
boundaries of the City of Temecula.
PROGRAM:
Snyder Langston, MacHutchin Development and Austin Design Group will
form "Development Team" for the express goal of planning and developing
industrial facilities for qualified firms having a need for those facilities in the
City of Temecula. The City of Temecula will provide the "Development
Team" the necessary government approvals to limit the final permit process
to thirty (30) days.
COMMITMENT:
The "Development Team" will provide the design services required to get
preapprovat for the development on a non site specific industrial project,
financing, and construction. The City of Temecula will provide the planning
review, plan check, and all other necessary governmental agency review of
the project to allow the preapproval. Delaying payment for those services,
(i.e plan check fees, permit fees, traffic fees, etc.) until an individual project
has final approval on a specific site.
PROPOSED PROJECT TYPE:
The "Development Team" proposes to initially submit documents for a
prototype industrial project of approximately 50,000 SF, This facility will be
designed for single users. Our plan will take into consideration the local
design requirements, current CC&R's for the industrial parks in the area, and
our collective experience in the development and construction of industrial
facilities.
CORPORATE PROFILE
5,' DER
In 1959, Snyder Langston began building a reputation
as a Manager and Builder of distinguished public and
private developments in Southern California. The
trademark of our work: superior quality and timely
completion, consistently within budget. As our
reputation grew, so did the size and complexity of our
projects increasing our construction volume alone to
over ~ 120,000,000 per year.
The continued growth of Snyder Langston has resulted
from our repeat clientele and strong relationships with
our existing clients. These clients continue to use our
services due to our planning and management
capabilities, attention to detail, cost control, and overall
performance, assuring the success of each and every
project. We have developed an outstanding reputation
throughout the real estate industry as a provider of
superior services.
Our highly motivated and experienced team of
professionals is deeply involved in each phase of your
project - from business planning, use programming,
initial design, financial planning, and entitlements,
through construction, marketing, interior improvements
and move-in. Our proven leadership and expertise in
management, estimating, value engineering and
scheduling[ enable you to have control of the entire
process from start to finish.
Our reputation for producing top quality, cost efficient
products & services continues to grow. We do it all...
and we do it right. It is a simple philosophy, one which
guides us still at Snyder Langston.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SNYDER LANGSTON APPROACH
S DER LANGS'TON
We define our core
competency as "Process
Management", It is our goal
to manage each phase of
the process. Our measure
of success is the ultimate
delivery of the project to our
client with no unmet
expectations.
VALUE BASED
MANA CEMENT
PROJECT
DELIVERY
PROCESS
COMMUNICA T/ON
THE SERVICE
GOAL
At Snyder Langston, the core values which
guide our actions are CREATIVITY, EMPLOYEE
QUALITY OF LIFE, PROCESS EXCELLENCE,
INTEGRITY, SUCCESS, COMMITMENT and
COMMUNITY. Our Continuous Improvement
Program measures our success at nurturing the
culture created by this Management system.
The delivery of any project involves the manage-
ment of a large number of activities by many
people and companies. We define our core
competency as "Process Management". We
divide the Project Delivery Process into five
phases. Each phase is a building block for the
others, and each must be understood, organized,
and managed. It is our goal to manage each
phase of the process, and deliver every project to
our clients with no unmet expectations.
Historically, the Project Delivery Process has been
ill-defined and difficult. Unaligned goals,
inappropriate and inconsistent compensation
systems and the resulting multiple agendas are a
few of the basic issues that need to be addressed
amongst all team members in a candid and
straightforward fashion. Communication is the
solution, and we have geared all of our efforts
and systems at eliminating miscommunication and
poor timing in order to make the process a
successful team effort.
To provide the highest quality services to
our clients through a motivated, well-aligned staff
of professionals assuring the success of every
project and achievement of our service goal: "A
DELIGHTED CUSTOMER 100% OF THE TIME".
Whether managing the entire Project Delivery
Process, providing segmented Consulting or
General Contracting, our approach provides us the
overall perspective which will make the difference
on your project.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
5NYDER LAN~S'FON
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES EXPERIENCE
OAKLEY ENTERPRISES
Foothill Ranch, California
Construction Management services for a new 400,000 square
foot corporate headquarters facility. Snyder Langston's
involvement includes assisting with land purchase negotiations,
governmental relations, all entitlement and permit processing,
coordination with developer during their infrastructure
improvement work, selection of professional service firms and
design management for the project.
The facility will include office, manufacturing, assembly and
distribution areas, as well as an Oakley museum, boutique and
hellstop. Employee amenities include a NBA regulation basketball
court, fitness center, full service cafeteria and a 450 seat "team
auditorium ".
Architectural features consist of a forty foot stainless steel round
structure above the building's entrance. The entrance to the 40-
acre, fully finished site will be via a dramatic drive bordered by di
Giacomo (simulated sculptured rock) faced retaining wails.
ST. JOHN
Irvine, California
Project Management services for the renovation of an existing
164,000 SF building into a new manufacturing facility for the
high-end clothing designer. Services included design
coordination, value engineering, governmental negotiations and
relations and contracting. Work included site and interior
improvements as well as exterior skin renovation and new state-
of- the-art mechanical and electrical systems
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES
North American Parts Logistics Division
Ontario, California
A 760,000 square foot North American Logistics Center,
including administration offices, regional teleconferencing center,
distribution and a full-service cafeteria. The project was designed
to reflect Toyota's interest in quality and beauty both in the
buildings and on site. The surrounding 94 acre site is covered
with decorative colored stone, olive trees and traditional Japanese
flora. The facility is constructed of concrete tilt wails with a
steel-framed roof. Work included site preparation and
infrastructure improvements.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SNYDER LANESTON
Real Estate and Cons/ructjon 5En4CES
MICRO TECHNOLOGY
Anaheim, California
A 2-story corporate headquarters providing 131,500 SF of
administrative offices, production/manufacturing, assembly and
distribution for an electronics manufacturer. The shell was
concrete tilt-up construction with full tenant improvement build-
out.
A.S.T. RESEARCH
Fountain Valley, California
A new 247,000 SF build-to-suit facility on fully improved 13 acre
site. This computer manufacturing facility and corporate
headquarters includes specialty HVAC and control systems,
"world class" conveyor driven fabrication and assembly systems
for AST computer system products, and support administrative
areas.
KRAUSE'S SOFA FACTORY
Brea, California
One building remodel of 246,000 square feet as well as two new
buildings totaling 172,000 square feet.
SUBARU OF AMERICA
Irvine, California
Construction of a 220,000 square foot office and parts
distribution center.
MALLINCKRODT MEDICAL, INC.
Irvine, California
Complete design/build responsibility for a 110,000 SF medical
manufacturing facility, warehousing and offices, Work includes
installation of MEP systems, interior improvements, and shell and
core modifications.
CORPORATE POINT
Irvine, California
Construction of five 2-story office and research & development
buildings.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SNYDeR LANGSTON
TOASTMASTERS
Rancho Santa Margarita, California
Build-to-suit project consisting of concrete tilt-up construction
totaling 40,000 square feet.
ALPHA MICRO
Santa Ana, California
180,000 SF build-to-suit computer manufacturing facility and
corporate headquarters, including cleanroom areas, computer
rooms and Halon system.
SOUTHPARK
Fountain Valley, California
Construction of seven concrete tilt-up buildings which totaled
312,000 square feet,
SCHICK MOVING & STORAGE
El Toro, California
Build-to-suit project consisting of concrete tilt-up construction and
totaling 40,000 square feet.
FULLERTON/ACACIA
Fullerton, California
Construction of two office buildings and six research &
development facilities,
COZEN INDUSTRIAL
Placantia, California
Construction of a retail/commercial building which totaled 38,000
Square feet.
ANAHEIM DISTRIBUTION CENTER
Anaheim, California
A 106,000 square foot industrial warehouse/distribution facility.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SNYDER LANESTON
REal ~s~Z~t~ ~ ~ 5~FI~S
NO-JO'S
Rancho Santa Margarita, California
A 2-story, 50,000 square foot office/light manufacturing facility.
SAN JOAQUIN CORPORATE PARK
Aliso Viejo, California
Construction of a two-story office building 37,000 square feet,
ONTARIO 140
Ontario, California
A 140,000 square foot industrial, concrete tilt-up building.
MISSION LINEN
Chino, California
Construction of a 187,504 square foot new linen/laundry cleaning
facility.
FREEWAY SHOWROOMS
San Bernardino, California
Construction two concrete tilt-up retail buildings totaling 46,500
square feet.
SAN BERNARDINO AUTO CENTER
San Bernardino, California
Construction of 2 concrete tilt-up buildings totaling 31,000
square feet.
OTAY COMMERCE CENTER
Otay Mesa, California
Constructior~ of six tilt-up buildings totaling 280,000 square feet.
NELLCOn
San Diego, California
Preconstruction services to furnish cost analysis, design
development review, value engineering, and schedule owner FFE
and move-in for a 90,000 SF build-to-suit facility.
Construction of one 1-story, 90,000 SF build-to-suit facility.
Tenant improvements include medical instrument manufacturing
and assembly areas with administrative offices and warehouse.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
5NYDER LAN STON
POMERADO BUSINESS PARK
Poway, California
Two industrial buildings and four multi-tenant industrial buildings
consisting of 240,000 square feet.
CENTRAL PURCHASING
Camarillo, California
A 155,000 square foot distribution warehouse addition to an
existing facility.
EASTON COMPOSITES
Otay Mesa, California
A 2-story, 70,200 SF manufacturing and warehouse assembly
facility for sports products.
TROLLEY BUSINESS PARK
San Diego, California
One office building with mezzanine including a 104,000 square
foot warehouse.
SOUTHBAY INDUSTRIAL CENTER @ EASTLAKE
Chula Vista, California
One industrial building totaling 185,000 square feet.
LARWIN-ROSEDALE CENTER
Cadsbad, California
Construction of two buildings, each consisting of 1-story with
mezzanine in a 194,000 square foot concrete industrial complex.
WILLOWCREEK PLAZA
San Diego, California
Construction of a 4-story office building totaling 80,000 square
feet.
GATEWAY AT OTAY
San Diego, California
Construction of four industrial buildings totaling 420,000 square
feet.
THE CAMPUS
Cadsbad, California
Construction of two research & development buildings and one 2-
story office building totaling 180,000 square feet.
SIVYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SNYDER LANESTON
MG INDUSTRIES
Otay Mesa, California
Design and construction of a liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen
pipeline and fill terminal which cross the Mexican/U.S. border at
Otay, California. Project includes support maintenance structure,
oxygen/nitrogen tanks and associated process piping.
FOUR POINTS BUSINESS PARK
San Diego, California
One 3-story office building and two 2-story research &
deveJopment/office buildings. Project consisted of 160,000
square feet.
CARROLL TECHNOLOGY CENTER
San Diego, California
Construction of a business park consisting of four 2-story
office/research & development buildings totaling 132,000 square
feet.
CENTERPOINTE
San Diego, California
Project included the construction of four 1-story office and
research & development buildings, each with a mezzanine and
totaling 144,000 square feet.
ONTARIO 400
Ontario, California
A 410,420 square foot industrial, concrete tilt-up building.
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICAL, INC.
Santa Fe Springs, California
Construct[on of truck maintenance, repair and distribution
terminal. Project consisted of two concrete tilt-up buildings: one
11,000 SF and one 600 SF; and three acres of parking within a
secured site. Building included two locker rooms, general office
space and three maintenance/washdown bays.
KING BEARING
Corona, California
A 200,000 square foot manufacturing/distribution facility with
45,000 square feet of corporate offices.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SNYDER LANESTON
Es~a~ and C~nstf~
RESERVOIR BUSINESS PARK
Pomona, California
Six concrete tilt-up industrial buildings totaling 91,800 square
feet.
HATHAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK II
Santa Fe Springs, California
Construction of a business park consisting of eight industrial
concrete tilt-up buildings and totaling 250,000 square feet.
PLAZA DEL NORTE
Oxnard, California
Project consisted of three industrial buildings and two commercial
buildings totaling 95,000 square feet.
METRO CENTRE
Anaheim, California
Completion of a 4-story office building totaling 84,000 square
feet,
OCCIDENTAL BUSINESS CENTER
Chatsworth, California
Construction of a business park which consisted of four 2-story
office buildings totaling 96,000 square feet.
BIXBY RANCH
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Two research & development facilities totaling 60,000 square
feet.
GALE AVENUE
City of Industry, California
Construction of a 37,000 square foot industrial building and
renovation of a 48,000 square foot research & development
facility.
HARMON BUSINESS PARK
Northridge, California
Office park renovation & relocation/construction of HVAC central
plant.
INDUSTRY HILLS I
City of Industry, California
Conversion of existing warehouse to COSTCO retail center.
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SCHICK DATA STORAGE
5NYDER LANGSTON
Owner: Schick Data Storage
Architect: Himes, Peters, Mason
Location: Tustin, California
Description: 40,000 square foot
facifity.
concre[e
tilt-up
storage
SNYDER LANGSTON CAPABILITIES
SUBARU OF AMERICA
SNYDER LANESTON
EStatE and Construction S~rvicEs
Owner:
Architect:
Location:
Description:
Subaru of Amenca
LPA
irvine, California
220,000 square foot pan's and distribution facility.
,gAI)'DER IANGSTON CAPABILITIES
MacHUTCHIN DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATE PROFILE
Since 1979 MacHutchin Development has developed projects ranging from the $20
million Belmont Park project in San Diego to a $2 million office and warehouse for the
Bureau of Land Management in El Centro. California. Graham MacHutchin, President,
holds a civil engineering degree and a California Real Estate Brokers license, and has
over 30 years experience in the development and construction of real estate.
Specializing in the planning, site selection, financing, obtaining of governmental
approvals. leasing and management of real estate, MacHutchin Development has
worked for a wide spectrum of clients including the Federal Government, the City of
San Diego. San Diego Gas & Electric, Mission West Properties. and San Diego
Wholesale Electric.
LIST OF PROJECTS
Project Name
Description
Belmont Park
Mission Beach, CA
100,000 sq. ft. retail development
South Sorrento Plaza
San Diego, CA
70,000 sq. ~. office building
Pioneer Business Center
El Cajon, CA
100,000 sq. ff. industria park
Mission Commercial Center
50,000 sq. ft. commercial center
Columbia Square Atrium
San Diego, CA
21,000 sq. ft. office building
Bureau of Land Management
El Centro, CA
18,000 sq. ft. office & warehouse
Palmira Village Apartments
San Ysidro, CA
74 unit apartment complex
INTRODUCTION
CORPORATE
HEAD QU ART E R ~'
9605 SCRANTON RD
SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO
CALIFORNIA
92121
(619)546-0110
FAX (619)546-0440
The Austin Design Group (ADG) believes in innovation. Quite
simply, we are commit'red to challengfng the constraints of
expectation. We strive to make the best even beffer, to create
human-responsive environments which enhance the experience
of those functions for which it exists.
Our approach to design is interactive. It stems from the client, the
site, and from ourselves in consultation with the projects users. We
involve our clients In the process, often utilizing our Charrette
design sessions. These are intensive, multi-day meetings in which
conceptual designs evolve. Both decision makers and users
participate. They see the design alternatives, discuss the factors
being brought to bear, and have an immediate and powerful
influence on the outcome.
Led by Douglas H. Austin. FAIA, recipient of over 50 design
awards, the Austin Design Group has established itself as one of
Southern Callfornta's leading design firms. We offer professional
services in Architecture, Planning, and Engineering. To this, we
add a systematic process of project management, quality
assurance, and cost control. so that budgets are met and every
detail is carefully considered.
Creating the best possible project for every client is our ultimate
goal. ADG"s artistic and technical skills always maintain the highest
of professional standards. The results of such a commitment to
excellence are tangible -- inr~vafive, cost-effective solutions that
are thoughtful, appropriate and thoroughly executed responses
to both the ciient's and the project's needs.
PHILOSOPHY
DISCIPLINES
A U $ T I N
"In-house" services enable us to quickly and efficiently satisfy
design and engineering needs for projects both large and small.
These services are:
Architecture
Design. production of construction documents, and construction
administration for all types of projects.
Planning and Urban Design
Land use. urban design and policy processing including site
planning. environmental planning, general plan amendments,
major use permits. annexations/special districts, site and project
feasibility studies. and redevelopment planning.
Interior Design and Space Planning
Interior services include programming (needs assessment),
space planning, Interior design with furniture/finish specifications,
tenant improvement documents, and construction administration.
Civil Engineering
All major elements of the land use pran, site plan, tentative map
and record map. Design and prepare all maps and
improvement plans including sffeet plans, boundary/lot surveys,
water and sewage systems, grading plans and earthwork.
Structural Engineering
Developing stable, efficient and cost-effective buildings is a
pdmary concern of ADG's Structural Engineers. New structures
and renovations, all forms of construction, and state-of-the-art
seismic design.
Computer Capabilities
Our design and drafting efforts are enhanced through the use of
our computer aided design and drafting (CADD) system. We
have qualified CADD operators spanning all in-house disciplines.
Computer systems include IBM-compatibles running AutoCAD,
AutoPE. Finite Analysis software for structural calculations and
networked Maclntoshes running graphics, and office automation
software. Our sailware library includes MacProject and MacFlow
scheduling software, and Dynaperspective 3D rendering
software. We have a scanner with OCR software. a Canon C J7
color scanner/printer. loser printers and a ploffer.
D E S I G N Q I~ O U P
CHARRETTE PROCESS IS BASED ON:
· Realization of Client Related Goa~
· Identification of Project Related Facts
· Identification of Project Related Needs
· Development and Analysis of Design
Altemafives
· Selection and Refinement of the
Desfgn Solution
WE USE THIS PROCESS TO:
· Maximize effective communications
· Focus energfes ot the entire
Client/Designer team on problem-
solving specific to project needs
· Facilitate direct Client participation in
the design process
· Constantly review existing site
conditions as the design solution
evolves
· Gain direct insight into the character
and culture of the Client
Utilizing a unique problem-solving process, ADG's
projects are designed through the interactive participation of
our multi-disciplined architectural, engineering. and Client team,
rather than the individual efforts of a solo designer.
At ADG, the Clfent becomes a key participant, With our on-site
design sessions, concepts are developed and evaluated with
the direct participation of the Owner/User to determine the most
appropriate solution the first time.
We call this on-site process 'charreffe' (shar-eff), a term used
by the Ecole des Beaux Artes. Charreffe literally means 'cart'.
In design terms, charreffe means two-way communication.
During the charrette, our team places its total attention on you
and your project. Ourprofessionals. working lOto 12hourdays,
can accomplish more in one week"s time than most designers
can in months. Your time is not wasted on unnecessary
meetings. Because we have done our homework prior to the
start of the charrette. we know the existing conditions. We
understand the utilities, site boundaries, codes, zoning
restrictions and other facts before we even start, consequenfiy,
we begin making Intelligent decisions immediately.
CHARRETTE PROCESS
A U S T I N 0 I~ S I G N G I~ 0 U P
PROJECTS
A U $ T I N D E S I G N Q R O U P
CROSS-SECTION
PROJECT LIST
Experience of ~mn Principals while woddng together
ARCHITECTURE
COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/MIXED-USE:
WALL STREET PLAZA
Three-story, 32,000 s.f. retail and office building. La Jolla.
THE ANTRIUM
Remodel/renovation of two-story, 110,000 s.f. office building.
Orange, California.
BRISTOL SQUARE
Seven-story, 60,000 s.t. office and retail Front and F Streets In
downtown San DIego with two underground parking levels.
MARINA COURT
Five-story, 80,000 s.f, mixed-use project with 40 convertible loft
apartment units for artist residents. Ground-floor retail spaces and
below*grade parking. Third and Market, downtown San Diego.
LAUREL TRAVEL CENTER
5-story, 150,000 s.f. commercial/retail/parking center. San Diego.
5TH & BEECH
4-story, 32,EX:]O s.f. office buildfng in downtown San Diego.
OCEAN TERRACE OFFICE BUILDING
29,000 s.f. office building with parking garage for 55 cars. Solana
Beach, California. AIA MeritAward
PACIFIC EXECUTIVE PLAZA
Office complex in Solana Beach, California.
Best Office Complex
SAM Award/BIA:
FINANCIAL PROJECTS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNION
CORPORATE OFFICES
50,000 s.f. headquarters with leaseable space. San Diego.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNIONS
· El Cajon Branch -- Recently finished, 6300 s.f. featuring state-oF
the-art retail banking electronics
· Encfnitas Branch -- 15,600 s.f., two-story with state-of-the-art
banking facility, a 9,000 s.f. community room, and leaseable
office space. On El Camino Real in Encinitas, California.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANKS
· Rancho California Branch -- 5,500 s.f. prototype design for future
First Interstate Banks.
· Shadow Ridge Branch, Vista, California -- 5,500 s.f. branch
banking tacility.
· Hornet, California -- 5,000 s.f. remodel.
· Blythe, California -- 5,000 s.f. renovation.
R&D/INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING
RESOURCE RECYCLING CENTER
Fast-tracked 170,000 s.f. intensive material recovery and
recycling facility for San DIego County. San Marcos. California.
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
SCHOOL SUPPORT SERVICE CENTER
168,500 s.f.. maintenance, operations, transportation and
warehousing for the entire school district. Programming and full
architectural services. In association with Fleet Maintenance
Consultants. San Diego, California.
THE UPPER DECK COMPANY
246,000 s.f. manufacturing plant and corporate headquarters for
a company which manufactures high quality sports trading cards.
Carlsbad. California.
Gold Nugget Grand Award - Best Industrial Project, 1993
DEPOSITION TECHNOLOGY
69,000 s.f. R&D facility for the manufacturing of metalized
surfaces, San Diego. California. CIC/BIA Award, 1988
ELGAR CORPORATION
Manufacturing plant and corporate headquarters for the makers
of computer components. San Diego, California. AIA Honor
Award and CIC/BIA Award, 1986
WATKINS MANUFACTURING
Manufacturing and corporate offices for the largest portable spa
manufacturer in the U.S. Included a separate hazardous material
building. Vista, California.
CROSS S~CTION
page two
MEDICAL, LABORATORY & BIO-MED FACILITIES
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER
La Quinta Facilities:
Immediate Care Center: 9.500 s.f, center for urgent care
and occupational health. In progress.
Medical Office Building: 50,000 s.f. for phys~cian"s offices.
Also fncludes radiology, laboratory, industrial rehab and
Patient Education Center. In progress.
Rancho Mirage Campus: In-Pallent Pharmacy Center
Endoscopy/G.I. Treatment Center. In progress.
Pain Management Center. In progress.
Campus Master Plan
Medical Records
Neurology Department
Cafeteria
Nuclear Medicine
Peter lake Oncology Center:
Linear Accelerator
Anza Facility:
Immediate Care Center: 2000 s.f,
TRI CITY MEDICAL CENTER
The Austin Design Group has been involved In Its on-going
renovations for seven years. Completed remodels and additions
Include:
· Emergency Room
· NeD-Natal Intensive Care Unit
· In-patient and Ambulatory Surgery
· Women's Center
· Pediaffic Ward
· Child Care Center
· Administrative Office Building
· New Cenffal Plant
SCRIPPS MEDICAL CLINICS
· Carreel Mountain Ranch. CA -- Three-story, 87,000 s.f.
ambulatory health services. CIC/BIA Golden Tower Award &
CCAIA Merit Award
· Chula Vista, CA - Programming, space planning 34,000 s.f.
· Son Diego, CA - Space planning and tenant improvements for
a 30~00 s.f. clinic with complete ambulatory health services.
· Del Mar, CA -- Programming, space planning and tenant
Improvements for a 16,000 s.f. cllnlc.
QUIDEL
Two-stoW, 63,000 s.f. biDmedical facility with offices. laboratories,
manufacturing and high-bay spaces for warehousing and
packaging purposes. Award of Excellence - NCBC, 1990
WARING ROAD HEALTHCARE CENTER
A 20Gbed Skilled nursing facility, 85,000 s.fi Oceanside.
BARNES-HIND CORPORATION
Programming and preliminary design for two-story, 200,000 s.f.
manufacturing and administrative office building in Son Diego.
SPECIALTY MEDICAL CLINICS
· La Jolla, CA - 10,800 s.f, remodel of offices and laboratory.
· Encinitas, CA -- New office, internal medicine, 2,000 s.f.
· Son Diego, CA -- De Anza office remodel, 4,000 s.f.
CROSS S~CTION
page th{ee
HOTEL/RESORT/HOSPITALITY
ENCINITAS BEACH RESORT
Master plan of a five-star luxury resort hotel project involving
expansion of the 90D-acre La Costa Hotel and Spa. Encinitas.
PALM BEACH PLAZA
On the North Marinas Island of Solpan, 600-room resort hotel will
cater to both destination resort and busineSS clientele.
DHARMALA RESORT HOTEL
300-room, five-star resort hotel on the Island at Batam, Indonesia,
12 miles from Singapore.
PACIFIC BEACH GRAND
Three-story, 120-room hotel for Quality Suites. includes 15,000 s.f.
of ground-level retail and underground garage. San Diego.
TINIAN ISLAND
Master plan for a new community. Five distinct villages, each with
its own resort and commercial business center. Phase one Is a
new madrio and government center along the waterfront. North
Mariario Islands, a U.S. Commonwealth.
HOTEL PALMILLA
Conceptual design for a two-story hotel with conference facility
on 535-acres tn Cabo San Lucas, Mexico.
GROSVENOR INN/TOMATO'S RESTAURANT
Exterior renovation for a 205-roorn motor hotel, and a new, 145
seat Italian restaurant. San Diego, California.
SPORTS & FITNESS CENTERS
SPORTING CLUB AT LAKESHaRE TOWERS
90,000 s.f, fitness facility with gymnasium, top*of-the-line free
weight/Nauffius training circuit, an indoor jogging track, racquetball
courts, squash courts, aeroblcs rooms, outdoor sand volleyball
courts and Olympic poot, as well as spa with hydratherapy,
massage, sauna and steam. Additional services include a full-
service restaurant, bar and child care. Gold Nugget Grand
Award for Best Specialty Project, 1993 and Athletic Business
Magazlne's Facility of Merit Award, 1993
SPORTING CLUBS OF AMERICA
Comprehensive fitness facilities. Programming, architectural and
interior design In association with other architects; provided
specifications and research for new products for clubs:
*Atlanta -- 90,000 s.f., part of a mixed-use project.
.Chicago _ I00,000 s.f. club, part of a mixed-use project.
.La Jolla, California -- 15,650 s.f. club, part of a mixed-use project.
· Montreal - 100,000 s.f., part of condominium project.
.Philadelphia - 67,500 s.f. club atop of a parking garage.
.Boca Raton - Design for 88,000 s.f., part of a mixed-me project.
.Mission Valley (San Diego) -- Design for an 8,000 s.f. club, parr of
a mixed-use project.
CROss S~C11ON
page four
RELIGIOUS
THE CHURCH OF ST. THOMAS MOORE
A two-phase church complex with an 850-seat sanctuary, daily
chap.r, parish hall, administrative offices, rectory and classrooms.
In progress. Oceanside, California.
CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY
550-seat church, rectory, parish administration building, 300-
student secondary school. parish hall, and chapel in Rancho
Santa Fe. Moore, Ruble, Yudell, consulting architect. 4 Orchids
Orchids and Onions Awards, 1990; AIA/SD Honor Award, 1991
CAMP CEDAR GLENN
5,000 s.f. auditorium and dining hall with kitchen. Julian, California.
AIA Merit Award and a Society of Registered Architects Award
INTERIOR DESIGN
SDG&E
200.000 s,f. consolidation of 8 locations Into one complex.
Interiors, space planning and tenant improvements. San DIego.
SPERRY/VAN NESS
Space planning and Interiors of 6,500 s.f. real estate investment
brokerage office. La Jolla, California.
KENNETH C. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES
11 ~00 s.f. Advertising Agency. included programming, space
planning and intedor design. La Jolla, California.
ONE HARBOR DRIVE
Model unit Interior design for a 42-story highdse In downtown San
Diego. (Consulting artist: Joan Warren.) 1992 SAM Award Best
Residential Interior Design Attached Home.
MAILBOXES ETC,
Space planning and Interior design of a 3-story, 60,000 s,f.,
corporate office and training center for international ffanchiser of
MAILBOXES. ETC. stores. San Diego, California.
FOOTHILL THRIFT AND LOAN
4,500 s.f. space planning and interior design of branch office in
San Diego, California.
PEDIATRIC SPECIALTY
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING
80,000 s.f. space planning and interiors for doctors' offices,
administrative offices and an ambulatory surgery floor for
Chtldren's Hospital of San Diego, California.
SINGING HILLS COUNTRY CLUB
Interior design of restaurant/bar/entertainment facility. San Diego.
CROSS SECTION
page five
MASTER PLANNING
AVIARA
1,400-acre golf course oriented resort and residential community
with a 280-room luxury hotel, conference center. health club, retail
complex, restaurants. Developed master plan, Architectural
guidelines and preliminary architectural deslgn. Carlshad.
SAN MARCOS TOWN CENTRE
Master plan of a 59-acre site. Includes 150.000 s.f. City Hall, library,
Community Center, 22-acre park, retail. theater complex.
restaurants, office plaza, hotel. senior housing. executive housing.
SUTTER BAY
Planning and design for a new community in South Suffer County
with pedestrian-oriented planning and innovative transportation
systems, Recipient of Award ln Smithsonian lnsfitute Competition
"The Electric Vehicle in the American Community".
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIV. FOUNDATION MP
Master Plan and design of three separate sites totaling 105-acres
adjacent to the SDSU main campus. Provided 3,500 units of
housing. 700,000 s.f. office. 350.000 s.f. of commercial/retail.
BATIQUITO$ LAGOON EDUCATIONAL PARK
Master Plan and schematic design of a 220,000 s.f. graduate
university, executive conference center with 330-room hotel, 1.1
million s.f. commerclal/R&D, Olympic volleyball facility and ~0
residential units. Cadsbad. California,
DALEY RANCH
3.048-acre, master-planned community with vartety of housing
types, four neighborhood parks, 2gO*acre nature preserve, 1B
hole golf course and clubhouse, 150-suite country inn, 12-acre
commercial center. swim and tennis club. elementary school.
day care center and fire station. San DIego. California.
URBAN DESIGN
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR, PROMENADE
A linear park spanntng four major districts of downtown San Diego.
Provides open/recreation space for nearby residential, and
ceremonial entrance for convention center and adjacent hotels.
SACRAMENTO DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
Design guidelines for Sacramento's Central Business District. It
covered public arts. paving standards, signage, street amenities
and landscaping. Sacramento, California.
CARLSBAD STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
A multi-phased sffeetscape renovation project with street furniture
design and sculptural gateways for the City of Carlsbad.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
UNIVERSITY COMMONS
Landscape master planning of 150-acres of riparlan environment
fn a 500 acre mixed use development in San Marcos, California,
Landscape standards established for streetscapes, parks,
pedestllan and equestrian trail system throughout the site.
VANTAGE POINT
A 30a-acre residential community in Escondido. landscaping was
designed for retention of the native vegetation. Developed
architectural. landscape architectural and siting guidelines.
STATE ROUTE 15 CUT & COVER
Landscape master planning for four park sites along a 2.2 mile
long corridor of proposed freeway in Mid-City San Diego.
CROSS SECTION
page six
IMAGES
A U S T I N D E $ I G N G R O U P
A U S t I N D E 5 I G N G R O U P
Gold Nugget Merit Award. 1988
AVIARA
Located on the north shore of scenic Batlquitos Lagoon. Avlara is a 1,407-acre, master-planned resori'
community. At the center of the site is a world-class resort composed of a 650-room It~un/hotel.
conference facility, health club. restaurants. championship golf course, and community spats center.
M A 5 T E R P L A N N I N G
A Lf S T t N D E S I G N G R O U P
Gold Nugget Grand Award - Best Industrial Project, 1993
THE UPPER DECK COMPANY
246,(:X30 s.f. manufacturing plQnt and corporate headquarters for a company which manufactures high
quality sports trading cards. Cadsbad, California.
R & D / I N (:) U S T R I A L / M A N U F A C T U R I N G
A U S T I N D E S { G N G ~ O U P
CCAIA Honor Award, 1986
CIC/BIA Golden Tower Award, 1986
SCRIPPS CLINIC
90,000 square foot, three-story, full-service health maintenance cltnic located In the center of an industrial
park. Tilt-up consffuction was utilized to meet sffingent budget requirements for both the site work and shell
consffuction. A sky-tit atrium containing stairs and elevators sits at the hinge point of all fnternal circulation.
M E D I C A L F A C I L I T I E $
A U S T I N D E S I G N G R O U P
Pacific Coast Builders Gold Nugget Grand Award -- Best Specialty Project, 1993
Athletic Building Magazine Facility of Merit Award, 1993
SPORTING CLUB AT LAKESHORE TOWERS
525 rntllian, 90,(]:]0 s.f. state-of-the-art fitness center. AmenZties inolude squash and racquet ball courts,
weight rooms, aeroblcs, Jogging track, gymhas/urn, swimming pool, health spa, a full service restaurant, bar
and a child care. Klsho Kurokawa was consulting designer on building shell.
S P O R T S & F I T N E S S C E N T E R S
IIIIIIIIil!itJ" 'q~li:] ;"
llllllallglli .,. :ili:;.:._._:..;,,.~
,1
llilililllll~ "] 311i!
IIIIIIIII!ll~i~. ,11111:~;
Z
o
Z
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 4, 1996
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
Prepared By: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. PA96-0232;
ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. PA96-0232;
PROPOSED ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
ADOPT Resolution No. 96-__ recommending approval of
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
Four-Sher Development Company
Charles Sher
To construct and operate a two-story 92,182 square foot
warehouse/distribution facility on 4.88 gross acres.
East of Ynez Road, north of County Center Drive
in the Winchester Highlands Business Park
LI (Light Industrial)
North: LI (Light Industrial)
South: LI (Light Industrial)
East: LI (Light Industrial)
West: SP (Specific Plan Overlay)
Not requested
BP (Business Park)
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Industrial building
Vacant
Industrial building
Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
Total Site Area:
Building Footprint Area:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Proposed Uses:
Warehouse/distribution:
Corporate office:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
4.88 acres net
83,882 square feet (39.5%)
71,500 square feet (33.6%)
55,268 square feet (26.0%)
69,136 square feet (75%)
23,046 square feet (25%)
146 vehicle spaces, I motorcycle space,
7 bicycle spaces
146 vehicle spaces, 16 motorcycle spaces,
8 bicycle spaces
30 feet
BACKGROUND
A pre-application meeting was held for this project on August 30, 1996. The application was
formally submitted on September 6, 1996. The Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting
was held on September 26, 1996, and the project was deemed complete on October 11, 1996.
This project is a fast-track application.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Four-Sher Development Company proposes to construct a two-story 92,182 square foot
industrial building within the existing Winchester Highlands Business Park. The facility is
designed for warehouse and distribution uses, with approximately 25% of the interior proposed
for corporate offices. Precise grading plans have already been submitted and are currently
being reviewed by staff.
ANALYSIS
Site Design
The project has two access drives off Ynez Road, one at the north end of the site, and the
other at the south end. Vehicular and truck traffic can circulate the entire site perimeter.
Parking spaces for vehicles, motorcycles and bicycles, surround the building on three sides,
with loading/unloading docks located entirely to the rear. The design offers three employee
patio areas.
The applicant proposed this building on speculation, and the parking spaces provided in the
proposal comply with his original estimates of uses per square foot . However, since
R:~TAFFRF~232PA96.PC 10/30/96 klb 2
submitting his proposal, the applicant has entered into negotiations with a potential buyer for
the finished building. If the negotiations are fruitful, the uses per square foot would be
modified to the following configuration:
Manufacturing
Warehouse
Office
37,968 square feet (41%)
42,214 square feet (46%)
12,000 (13%)
Using the standard formulas in the parking code, this configuration would require an additional
25 vehicle spaces and one additional bicycle space. However, the potential buyer indicates that
his current employee count is 75 for their main shift. Even if the workforce were doubled, the
146 vehicle spaces, 8 bicycle spaces and 16 motorcycle spaces provided could accommodate
it. The standard formulas in the parking code are disproportionate to the needs of this
particular user because they have injection molding machinery that physically occupy more than
half (53%) of the area designated as manufacturing and require only a handful of employees
in this area. Staff agrees with the applicant that requiring additional vehicle spaces beyond
those already provided on the siteplan are unnecessary.
Additionally, the 45-foot rear setback and slope area could be modified in the future should
additional parking spaces be necessary. Staff estimates that this could result in an additional
40 vehicle spaces.
Architecture
The applicant's architect has offered a stepped building frontage along Ynez Road, to take
advantage of the curved property line as well as to provide vertical lines and shadows.
Entrances are articulated with an abundance of blue hued glass. Horizontal indents travel
around the concrete building, and four-block tiles of marbled blue-green provide additional
accents. The overall architecture is consistent with adjacent buildings, both existing and
proposed.
LandscaDing
The applicant's landscape architect proposes over 30% of the site for landscaping. His plan
is consistent with the 20% minimum requirement of the LI (Light Industrial) zone. Flowering
accent trees, shrubs and groundcover create visual interest at the building entrances. Canopy
trees provide shading for the parking areas, ~nd shrub massing separates the parking area from
Ynez Road. Combined with the existing business park common streetscape, the applicant
proposes an adequate buffer and screening from public view.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
Existing zoning on the site is LI (Light Industrial). Warehouse/distribution uses are permitted
with the approval of a development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code.
The General Plan designation for the site is BP (Business Park). The project as designed is
consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An initial study was prepared for the project, which determined that the proposed project could
potentially affect geologic problems, water, transportation and circulation, energy and mineral
resources, public services and aesthetics. However, these effects are not considered to be
significant due to the mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions
of Approval. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated and reduced to insignificant
levels.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project is consistent with the City General Plan and Development Code. The applicant has
been responsive to issues and concerns raised by staff, and has enhanced the project amenities
and building design.
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State Law. The project is consistent with all City
ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar
Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and general welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances
and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has been determined that although
the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects
are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project
design and in the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been
previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native
species of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species
exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can
be made for this project.
R:~TAFFRF1~232pA96.PC 10/30/96 klb 4
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 18
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 38
Exhibits - Blue Page 46
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Landscape Plan
F. Elevations
G. Floor Plan
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 96-
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TF_31ECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA96-0132 TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 92,182 SQUARE FOOT
WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 4.88 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF YNEZ
ROAD, NORTH OF COUNTY CENTER DRIVE AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-110-042
WIWRFAS, Four-Sher Development Company fried Planning Application No. PA96-0232
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
~, Planning Application No. PA96-0232 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0232
on November 4, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA96-0232;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA96-0232 makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The project is consistent
with all City ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mr. Palomar
Lighting Ordinance), and the City' s Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the. protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula for the protection of the public health, safety
and welfare.
Section 3. F, nvironmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby
granted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 to construct and operate a 92,182 square foot
warehouse/distribution facility located east of Ynez Road and north of County Center Drive and
known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-110-042 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSF. F}, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1996.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HERERY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of
November, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~STAFFRFI'~32PA96.PC 10/30/96
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 - Development Plan, Fast Track
Project Description: A Development Plan to construct and operate a 92,182 square foot
warehouse/distribution facility on 4.88 gross acres.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-110-042
Approval Date: November 4, 1996
Expiration Date: November 4, 1998
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination with a DeMinimus Finding required under Public Resources Code Section
21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight
(48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the
check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and
any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents
from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No.
PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track). City shall promptly notify the
developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period.
City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to
either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be
responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit "D" approved
with Planning Application No. PA96-0232, or as amended by these conditions.
R:~STAFI~,FI'X232pA~6.PC 10/30~6 klb 10
a. A minimum of one hundred forty-six (146) parking spaces shall be provided.
b. A minimum of five (5) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
c. A minimum of seven (7) bicycle spaces and one (1) motorcycle space shall be
provided.
Landscaping shall be provided in substantial conformance with Exhibit E (Landscape Plan),
or as amended by these conditions.
Building construction shall conform substantially with Exhibit D (Site Plan) and Exhibit F
(Color Elevations), or as amended by these conditions.
Colors and material for building construction shall conform substantially with Exhibit H
(Color Board and Materials), or as amended by these conditions.
Concrete building base
Storefront
Storefront doors
Colors
Perma White #SW2130 by Sherwin Willlares
Painted mullions to match building color
Tru-Vu blue-green heat-treated high performance glass
Metal rollup doors & loading docks
Tile accent
Reveal trim
Stormy Night #SW2100 by Sherwin Williams
The Tile Garden blue green marble tile No. 6UT93
Melbourne Coast #SW1475 by Sherwin Willlares
The maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required if signage
is proposed.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code, regarding Habitat Conservation.
11.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the MitigatiOn Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
12.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation
Fees.
13.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing
fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
P-:\STAI~I~RPT~32PA96.FC ]0/30/t~ kJb 11
shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. These plans
shall include planting on slopes. The cover page shall identify the total square footage
of the landscaped area for the site.
14.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
16.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation
plans.
17.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good
working order.
18.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at
a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk, A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
19.
20.
21.
22.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to
guarantee the removal of the maintenance and operations trailers, the temporary parking,
and the temporary landscaping.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
R:~STA~pA96.PC 10/~0/96 klb 12
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
23.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code,
Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
24.
Submit at time of plan review, complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with
Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
25.
Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to the commencement of any
construction work.
26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
27.
All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations
(California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1994).
28.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
29. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
30. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site
plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision.
General Requirements
31.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
32.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
33.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated
for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site
and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
34.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
R:XSTAFFRPTX232pA96.PC 10/30/96
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction
of engineered structures and pavement sections.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
An Area Drainage Plan fee shall be paid to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or
through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets
for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply.
Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of s~reets be prohibited for
drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRFI~232pA~.PC 10/30/96 tlb 14
44. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through
private property.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
45. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City
Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. An Encroachment
Permit will be required for any work performed within the City right-of-way. The
following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be piped or
conveyed through undersidewalk drains.
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approaches and
street lights
The building pad shall be certified to' have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soils
Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established
per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be
paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of-the fee. If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date
on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof,
the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
46.
47.
48.
49.
R:\STAFFRPT~32pA~6.1~ 10/30/96 ~b 15
which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement,
the Developer shall secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security
shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that
said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated
(assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this
Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition,
of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy,
or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; ~ that
the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact
fee, and the amount thereof.
50.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and wave all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed raised
landscaped median on Ynez Road in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the
offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
51.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
52.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
53.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
54.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public
Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
55.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 22, 1996, a copy of
which is attached.
56.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated September 19, 1996, a copy of which is attached.
57.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal
Water District's transmittal dated September 24, 1996, a copy of which is attached.
R:\STA~2PA96,FC 10~30/~ kl~ 16
58.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendation set forth in the California Historical
Resources Information System transmittal dated October 2, 1996, a copy of which is
attached.
59.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Fire Department transmittal dated October 24, 1996, a copy of which is attached.
R:~STA~2PAg~.PC 10/30/96 klb 17
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: October 22, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Carole Donahoe
~GOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
PLOT PLAN NO. PA96-0232
1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA96-0232 and has no
objections,
2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule.
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2.
c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (358-5055) will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks. Ordinance # 617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2).
· Waste reduction mana/gement.
GD:dr
(909) 285-8980
cc: Doug Thompson. Hazardous Materials Branch
John F, Hennigar
PhiHip L Forbes
Kenneth C. Dealy
Linda M. Fregoso
September 19, 1996
Ms. Carole Donahoe, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT:
Water Availability
Parcel 10 of Parcel Map 21361
APN 910-110-042
Planning Application No. PA96-0232
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
%ISB:mg2161FOI21FEF
cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Carole Donahoe
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
1996
I SEP Z ? 1998
By
SUBJECT: PA96-0232 (Four-Sher) - Agency Case Transmittal
Dear Mrs. Donahoe:
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which
describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below:
Our understanding is the proposed subject project will develop a
92,182 sq. ft. warehouse and distribution facility for Four-Sher
Development on 4.88 gross acres in Parcel 10 of PM 21361 (APN 910-
110-042). The subject project is located on the east side of Ynez
Road, north of County Center Drive in the City of Temecula.
The subject project is within the District's sewer service
boundary. A matter of importance which must be understood is the
available service capabilities of the District's systems are
constantly changing due to the continuous development within the
District and the improvement of District facilities. Hence, the
service for the subject project will be dependent upon the
available capacity of the District's systems at the time service
agreements are made with the District.
DOMESTIC WATER
The subject project is outside of EMWD's water service area. Any
potable water service must be arranged with the Rancho California
Water District.
Mail to: Post Office Box 8300 San Jacinto, California 92581-8300 Telephone (909) 925-7676 Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto Customer Service / Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oak]and Avenue, Hemct, CA
Operations & Maintenance Center: 2270 Trumble Road, Perris, CA 92571 Telephone (909) 928-3777 hx (909) 928-6177
Carole Donahoe
PA 96-0232
Page 2
SANITARY SEWER
The subject project is tributary to the District's Temecula Valley
Regional Water Reclamation Facility. A 12-inch VCP sewer is in
Ynez Road (SD-6375). The 12-inch gravity sewer main is adequate to
serve the subject project. Three 6-inch sewer laterals extend from
the 12-inch main to the subject project. The laterals are located
at 717 feet, 733 feet and 1265 feet north of the centerline of
County Center Road. Any of these laterals may be used to serve the
project site. However, the subject project must be reviewed by the
District's Source Control Division to determine the need for grease
traps, sand traps, sampling boxes or other provisions.
RECLAIMED WATER
The project is outside of EMWD's water service area. Reclaimed
water usage must be arranged with Rancho California Water District.
ADDITION~T. INFORMATION
Additions or improvements to off-site facilities are not required
to adequately serve the subject project. This transmittal serves
as the plan-of-service for this project. The project will be
processed through the Customer Service Department for determination
of appropriate fees and Source Control requirements. Tracking of
the project shall be coordinated through the "One-Stop" program by
Ms. Judith Conacher at (909) 766-1810, ext. 4409.
Thank you for soliciting our c6ncerns. If you have any questions
regarding the above matter, please call me at (909) 766-1810.
Sincerely,
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Mike Gow
Civil Engineer
Customer Service Department
cc: Judy Conacher, EMWD Development Coordinator
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
INYO
RWERSIDE
Eastern Information Center
Department of Anthropology
UniverSity of California
Riverside, CA 92521-O418
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
CULTURAl, RESOURCE REVIEW
DATE: ~e~'
ILE: Case Transmittal Reference Designation:
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have
been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources:
The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural
resource(s). A Phase I study is recommended.
Based upon eating data the proposed project area Ms the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study
is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possibRity of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the
project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not
recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF # ~$7~ ) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommcnded.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while
a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
Due to the arehaeclogical sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during constr~ctinn should be monitored by a professional
archaeologist.
The submission of a cultural resoumc management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological
Resource Management Reports prepaM by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin
4(aj. December 1989.
Phase I
Phase 11
Phase Ill
Phase IV
Records search and field survey
Testing Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.]
Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two .l
Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
City of Temecula
43200 I~slne~ Park Drh,'e · Temecula, CA 92590 - iv~lllng Adc~r P 0, BOx 9033 · Ternecula, CA 92589-9033
19091694do444 · FBX [9091694-1999
October 24, 1996
TO:
A~I~:
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CAROLE DONAHOE
PA 96-0232
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department
recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Temecula
Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction
of all commercial building using the procedures established in Ordinance 546. A fire flow
of 4000 GPM for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be available
before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A comb'mation of on.site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6"x4"x2-2
xh "), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than I65 feet from any portion of the
building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall
be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
Applicant/developer shall furnish 9n~"~.opy of the water plans to the Fire Department for
review. Plans shall be signed by-a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department
approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals
shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature.
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the
appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the
job site.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per square foot as
mitigation for fire protection impacts.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to
submit a plan check fec of $582.00 to the City of Temecula.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and FIre
department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a
hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building
will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building
plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to
the Fire Department for approval prior to installation.
Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buiMings/suites. If building/suite requires
H~nrdous Mamrial Reporting (h~aterial Safety Data Sheets) the Knox HAZ MAT Data
and key storage cabinets shall be installed. If building/suites are protected by a fire or
burglar alarm system, the boxes will require "Tamper" monitoring. Plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation.
All exit doors shall be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort.
Occupancy separation walls will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, Section
503.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2AIOBC. Fire extinguishers
located in public areas shall be in recessed cabinets mounted 48" (inches) to center above
floor level with a maximum 4' projection from wall.
R is prohibited to usedprocess or store any materials in this occupancy that would classify
it as an "H' occupancy per Chapter 9_, 9f the Uniform Building Code.
Blue dot reflectors shall be motm~ed in private streets and driveways to indicate location
of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with
fire hydrant.
Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 12 inches in height, on the
street side of the building with a contrasting background.
All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing materials as described in The
Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class 'B" rating and
shall be approved by the fire department prior to installation.
17. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and
Safety Office.
18. Please contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy.
All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department
Planning and engineering section (909)694-6439.
Laun Cabral
Fire Safety Specialist
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRIq'X232PA96.1~ 10/30~96 klb 18
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
Amended October 29, 1996
2.
3.
4.
10.
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Other public agencies whose approval
is required:
Planning Application No. PA96-0232
(Development Plan - Fast Track)
City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
Carole Donahoe, Project Planner (909) 694-
6400
East of Ynez Road, north of County Center
Drive, In the Winchester Highlands Business
Park
Four-Sher Development Company, 990
Highland Drive, Suite 202, Solana Beach,
CA 92075
BP (Business Park)
LI (Light Industrial)
To construct and operate a two-story,
92,182 square foot warehouse/distribution
facility on 4.88 gross acres.
Vacant parcels to the west and to the
south, industrial buildings to the north and
east
Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside
County Department of Environmental
Health, Temecula Police Department,
Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho
California Water District, Southern California
Gas Company, Southern California Edison
Company, and General Telephone Company.
R:tSTAFFRFB232PA~.I~C 10/30/96 {LIb 19
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
iX] Geologic Problems iX] Public Services
iX] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality iX] Aesthetics
iX] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
iX} Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
AMENDED ASSESSMENT
Additional information was considered subsequent to the preparation of the Environmental
Assessment for this project. This information, noted below, has resulted in an Amended
Environmental Assessment dated October 29, 1996.
While the project site is located within the designated Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Fee Area, the site has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape has already
been installed in the entire area known as Winchester Highlands Business Park. There
are no native species of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any
wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor.
Transportation/Circulation mitigation measures that require the payment of Public Facility
Fees and Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees are required prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
Mitigation measures that address the project's impacts to aesthetics include architectural
enhancements to the building design, location of loading bays, and conformance with
the submitted Color and Materials Board, Landscaping Plans and Elevations.
R:~STAFFRPT~32pA~6.PC 10/30/~6 klb 20
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signature
Date: October 29, 1996
Printed Name: Carole K. Donahoe
For: City of Temecula
R:L~TAFFRFB232PA~.PC 10/30/~ klb 21
· ' ........ . SIgnificant .'. Mitigation ' Significant. . N~
ISsues.and 'SuppORing:Information SoUrces ...'i,,p,ct .. ":.lncorlar=ted':' ...'4n~act :.. Impact
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or
zoning? (Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17}
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? (Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-
4, Page 5-17)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including low-
income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a. Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-
6)
b. Seismic ground shaking? (Source 1, Figure 7-
1, Page 7-6)
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
d, Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X I
R:~STAFFRPT~232pA96.1~C 10/30/9~ kJb 22
'. ·IssUes and' Supporting:Information Sources
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading or fill?
g~ Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-
2, Page 7-8)
h. Expansive soils?
I. Unique geologic or physical features?
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and mount of surface runoff?
b. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding? (Source 1,
Figure 7-3 and Figure 7-4, Pages 7-10 and 7-
12)
c. Discharge into surface waters or other
alteration of surface water quality (e.g.
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body7
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements?
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of
groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
I. Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public
water supplies?
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
(Source 5, Table 6-2, Page 6-10)
Potentially
Impact
· SIgnificant:
· Mitigation....' .. SlOnlficant
'.lncorporstsd "'|rnpsct
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
R:~STAI~R~Y~32PA96.l~C 10/30/~ klb 23
· Issues and 'Sup'p0r;~ing ·Information· SOurces
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature,
or cause any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.
sharp curves or dangerous intersection or
incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
(Source 2, Table 17.24(a), Page 17.24-9)
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists?
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (Source 2, Chapter 17.24,
Page 12)
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants,
fish, insects, animals and birds)? (Source 1,
Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage
trees)? (Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g.
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (Source 1,
Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripanan and
vernal pool)? (Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-
15)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:%STAFFRPT%232pA96.PC 10/30/96 kib 24
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans?
b. Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value
to the region and the residents of the State?
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or
radiation)? (Source 1, Figure 7-5, Page 7-14)
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
co The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard?
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards?
e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees?
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
(Source 1, Figures 8-3, 8-4, and 8-5, Pages 8-
11, 8-12 and 8-14)
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the
following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
Potendally
Significant
Implct
X
I' X
X
X
X
X
X
No
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~STAFFRFI'~32PA~.PC 10/30/96 klb 25
· issues· and"Suppo~in9 informatiOn:SourceS . ...s~...,~ ..:..M.~.t~
c. Schools7 X
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads7
e. Other governmental services?
12, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems
or ~pplies, or substantial alterations
to ~e following utilizes:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems7
c. Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities7
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic X
effect?
c. Create light or glare? X
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
8. Disturb paleontological resources? (Source 1,
Figure 5-7, Page 5-22 and Source 4)
b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1,
Figure 5-6, Page 5-21 and Source 4)
c.Affect historical resources? (Source 3, Page
281)
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Le$8 Then ·
Significant
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~TAFFRlri~232PA96.PC 10/30/96 lr. lb 2~
Issues .and" suppo'rting Information. sources' '.'.
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area?
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities7
Potentlily . . .~rde~..'.' ... .Lea~ Than '
· Signlficar~ · Mitigation. ' ~nfficant.
Implc~ 'Incorporated Impact
X
X
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number of restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly7
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None
X
X
X
X
X
SOURCES:
1. City of Temecula General Plan
2. City of Temecula Development Code
R:~STAFFRPT~32pA96.PC 10/30/96 klb 27
· ..: .......
Issues 'and :.sUppOrting :i~iformation :.s0'L,:~eS 'i..'.:.';5 .s~.m..t. ;. EMitiglltlon:':: :: ~llgntfldam:'." No .
'. · . · . .Impact.....:: :."lheorporated":' L:':'lmplct.. '. :.impact
3. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
4. University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center Cultural Resource Review,
dated October 2, 1996
5. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook
R:\STAFFRFr~32pA96.pC 10/30/96 k~ 28
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Land Use and Planning
1.b.
The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project.
The project is consistent with the City's General Plan land use designation of BP
(Business Park) as well as the zoning of LI (Light Industrial). Impacts from all General
Plan land use designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope
of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular
agency. Mitigation measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project.
Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are also being given the
opportunity to comment on the project, and it is anticipated that they will make the
appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans
or policies. The project site has been previously graded and services have been
extended into the area. There will be limited, if any, effects on adopted environmental
plans or policies. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority communities).
The project is a warehouse and distribution facility within the already existing
Winchester Highlands Business Park. Similar uses already surround the project site.
There is no established residential community (including low-income or minority
communities) at this site. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Pooulation and Housing
2.a. The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections.
The project is a warehouse and distribution facility consistent with the City's General
Plan land use designation of LI (Light Industrial). Since the project is consistent with the
City's General Plan, and does not exceed the floor area ratio for Light Industrial, it will
not be a significant contributor to population growth which will cumulatively exceed
official regional or local population proiections. No significant effects are anticipated
as a result of this project.
2.b. The project will not induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly.
The project site is within the Winchester Highlands Business Park which is partially
developed, and infrastructure exists to the site.
2.c. The project will not displace housing, especially affordable housing.
The project site is vacant. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:~STAFFRFI'~232pA96.PC 10/30/96
Geologic Problems
3.b,c,
f,h.
The project may expose people to potential impacts involving seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure and expansive soils, and less than significant impacts involving
erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or
fill.
The project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. The
site lies within Ground shaking Zone II which is expected to vary from moderate to
intense in the event of an earthquake, depending on the composition of underlying
geologic formations, the earthquake's epicenter and the order of magnitude of the
seismic event. The site is located near the Santa Gertrudis Creek which is an area of
potential liquefaction. Potentially significant impacts will be mitigated through building
construction consistent with the most recent Uniform Building Code seismic design
standards. Furthermore, preliminary soils reports are required and reviewed as part of
the application submittal, and recommendations contained in these reports are used to
determine appropriate conditions of approval for the project. The soils reports will also
contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any
potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure
(including liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils. Increased wind and water erosion of
soils both on and off-site may occur during the construction phase of the project, and
the project may result in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. Erosion control
techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the project. In the long-run,
hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion control for the project.
Modification to topography and ground surface relief features will not be considered
significant since modifications will be consistent with the surrounding development.
Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated
through the use of landscaping and proper compaction of the soils. After mitigation
measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.d. The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard.
The project is not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. No
significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e.
The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Temecula General Plan did not identify any known
landslide or mudslide hazard areas on or near the project site. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.i. The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features.
No unique geologic features or physical features exist on the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~?32pA96.~C 10/30/96 klb 30
4.c.
4.d,e.
4.f,g,h.
4.1
The project will result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of surface runoff; however, these changes are considered less than
significant.
Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings,
accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will
change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances
will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff which is created.
After mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharge into surface waters
and alteration of surface water quality.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to
comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be
permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be
exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be
mitigated to a level less than significant. After mitigation measures are performed, no
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant impact on changes in the amount of surface
water in any water body and on changes in currents, or the course of direction of water
movements.
Additional surface runoff will occur because previously permeable ground will be
rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and
driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, however, the additional amount of
drainage of drainage into Murrieta Creek or Santa Gertrudis Creek will not be considered
significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant change in the quantity, direction or rate of
flow, or the quality of ground water.
Limited changes will occur; however, due to the minor scale of the project, it will not
be considered significant. Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to
have a significant impact on ground water. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of ground water
otherwise available for public water supplies.
According to information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
the City of Temecula General Plan, "Rancho California Water District indicates that they
can accommodate additional water demands." Water service currently exists in the
immediate vicinity of the project site. Water service will be provided by Rancho
California Water District upon completion of financial arrangements between the District
R:\STA~2PA~6.~ 10/30/~ kl~ 3 1
and the property owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Air Quality
5.b. The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants.
The project is not located near sensitive receptors, and is not projected to generate
significant pollutants. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.c.
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change
in climate.
The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts with
regards to climatic conditions in the area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
5.d.
The project will create some objectionable odors during the construction phase of the
project.
These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant. No other
objectionable odors are anticipated as a result of this project.
Transportation/Circulation
6,a.
The project will result in a less than significant increase in vehicle trips, but will add to
traffic congestion.
It is anticipated that this project will contribute 55 to 185 vehicle trip ends per day.
Congestion at the intersection of Ynez Road and County Center Drive, as well as the
intersection of Ynez Road and Winchester Road will increase. However, Ynez Road and
Winchester Road in the vicinity of the project is designated and designed to handle the
built-out of the industrial park. The applicant will be required to provide facilities for
motorcycle parking and bicycle racks, and to pay traffic signal mitigation fees and public
facility fees as conditions of approval for the project. After mitigation measures are
performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.b. The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features.
The project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c,
The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to
nearby uses.
The project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access.
The project does not interfere with access to nearby uses, which are similar business
park/industrial uses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~TAFFRPT~32PA96.l~C 10/30/~ k~ 3~
6.e. The project will not result in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists.
Hazards or barriers are not proposed for the project. The project is designed to current
City standards requiring sidewalks and bicycle racks, No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
6.g, The project will not result in rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts.
Rail, waterborne or air traffic do not exist in the immediate proximity of the project site.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Biological Resources
7.a,e. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or
their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors.
The project site has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on
site. There are no native species of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication
that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. The
project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area, however,
and Habitat Conservation fees will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative
impacts to the species.
and Mineral Resources
The project will affect adopted energy conservation plans.
The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation during the plan check stage of development. No permits will be issued
unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. After mitigation
is performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will result in a less than significant impact upon the use of non-renewable
resources.
There will be an increase in the rate of use of natural resources and in the depletion of
construction materials, fuels for daily operation, asphalt, and lumber, However, because
of the scale of the proposed project, these impacts are seen as less than significant.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in the loss of the availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State.
No known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and to the
residents of the State are located at this project site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Energy
8.a.
8.b.
R:~TAFFR]~T~32PA96.PC 10/30/9~ lab 33
9.b.
9.c,d,e.
Noise
lO.a.
The project will result in a less than significant impact due to risk of explosion, or the
release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset.
The applicant may sell or distribute hazardous substances. However, they are regulated
by both the Fire Department and the Department of Environmental Health. The
applicant must receive clearance, including any storage or use of hazardous materials,
from the Department of Environmental Health prior to any plan check approval, and
clearance from the Fire Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in possible interference with an emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan.
The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response
plan. The project will take access from a maintained street and will not impede any
emergency response or emergency evacuation plan. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard,
nor expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards, nor increase fire
hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass or trees.
The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the
plan check and occupancy stages of development. No permits will be issued unless the
project is found to be consistent with these laws. No health hazards are known to be
in proximity to the project site. The project site is not located within or proximate to
a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels.
The site is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases
to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over
the long run. Long-term noise gene?ated by this project would be similar to existing and
proposed business park uses and expected in the area. No significant noise impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project, either short or long-term.
10.b. The project will result in some severe noise levels.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the construction phase of
development. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of
100+ dBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing
damage from steady eight-hour exposure. However, the source of such noise at the
project site will be of short duration, and not considered significant. There will be no
long-term exposure of people to severe noise. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
R:\STAl~RFI'~2pA96.~C 10/30/96 kl~ 34
Public Services
11 .a,b. The project will have an impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or police
protection.
The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection. However,
the developer will contribute his fair share of development impact fees earmarked for
such services. After mitigation is performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
11.c.
The project will have an effect upon, or result in the need for new or altered school
facilities.
The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City
of Temecula. However, some indirect impact of business and industrial use upon school
facilities is expected. The developer will contribute his fair share of development impact
fees earmarked for the school district. After mitigation is performed, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon maintenance of public facilities,
including roads. Funding for the maintenance of roads is derived from the State of
California gasoline tax, which is distributed to the City of Temecula. Impacts to current
and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of the project will be incremental,
and not considered significant. The gasoline tax is sufficient to provide for maintenance
expenses. No significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project.
11 .e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services.
The project is consistent with the General Plan designation for the area. The effect
upon governmental services is expected as part of the buildout of the business park.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Utilities and Service Systems
12.a,b. The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to power or natural gas or communication systems.
These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project,
12.c,
d,g
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities, sewer or septic
tanks, or local or regional water supplies.
The Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City of Temecula General Plan (p~
39) states: "Both Eastern Municipal Water District and Rancho California Water District
have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their service areas."
Furthermore (p. 40), "Implementation of the proposed General Plan would not
R:~TAl~FRl~T~232PA$~.PC 10/30/96 klb :35
significantly impact wastewater services." There are no septic tanks on site or
proximate to the site. Since the project is consistent with the General Plan, no
significant impacts are anticipated as a result.
12.e. The project will result in a less than significant need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to storm water drainage.
The project will provide some additional onsite drainage systems, and tie into existing
systems adjacent. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.f. The project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid
waste disposal systems.
Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be addressed
through participation in a Source Reduction and Recycling Program implemented by the
City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
13.a. The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway.
The project is not located in an area where there is a scenic vista. The City does not
have any designated scenic highways. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
13.b. The project will have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect.
The warehouse/distribution facility necessarily has long expanses of building walls, and
loading docks for trucks. The developer has designed his building with loading bays at
the rear of the building, away from the public way. He has provided architectural
enhancements to emphasize the front entrance and break up the wall expanse on the
other three sides. Landscaping plans also mitigate the negative aesthetic impact. After
mitigation is performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c. The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare.
The project will produce and resul~ in light and glare with the installation of new light
sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory.
The project will be conditioned to comply with Ordinance No. 655 Ordinance Regulating
Light Pollution. After mitigation is performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
Resources
The project will not cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
The site has been previously graded and resources would have been disturbed at that
time. No resources or religious uses exist at or are proximate to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Cultural
14.d,e.
R:~STAFFRP'r~32pAg~.PC 10/30/9~ klb 36
Recreation
15.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact on the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities, or affect existing recreational opportunities.
The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City
of Temecula. The developer has designed several outdoor lunch areas for his employees
within the project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~STA~2PA96.FC 1(F30/~6 klb 37
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\STAFF~2PA96.1'C 10/30/96
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan)
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the
initial grading plan check. Building pads shall be certified
by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety
Department.
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with
the Uniform Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
Erosion~ changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
from excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457.
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRFI~32PA96.1:C 10/30/96 kJb 39
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
from excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the
Development Code.
Submit landscape plans that include planting of slope to
the Planning Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to fault rupture, seismic
ground shaking, seismic ground failure, landslides or
mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake hazards.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the
initial grading plan check. Building pads shall be certified
by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building
permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety
Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to fault rupture, seismic
ground shaking, seismic ground failure, landslides or
mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake hazards.
Utilize 'construction techniques that are consistent with
the Uniform Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
R:~STAFFRF~232pA96.pC 10/30/~6 klb 40
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates,
drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface
runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not
negatively impact adjacent properties, including drainage
conveyances, have been incorporated into site design and
will be included on the grading plans.
Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of
Public Works for approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance
with City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance
with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego
Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for
their review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
R:~STAFFRPT~32PA~.PC 10/30/96 k/b 41
Transl)ortation/Circulation
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Public Facility Fee for road improvements and
traffic impacts.
Post bond @ $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed
$10,000.00 and execute agreement for payment of Public
Facility Fee.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Department of Public Works.
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee.
Pay pro-rata share for traffic impacts (to be determined by
the Director of Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site.
Provide on-site parking spaces to accommodate the use.
Install on-site parking spaces.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Department of Public Works, Planning Department and
Building & Safety Department.
R:~TAFFRPT~232pA96.I,C 10/30/96 klb 42
Energy and Mineral Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Affect upon energy conservation plans.
Compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation.
Submit energy calculations and pertinent data for review.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered
governmental services regarding fire protection. The
project will incrementally increase the need for fire
protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the
maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Fire Mitigation Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Riverside County Fire
Department.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered
schools. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley
Unified School District.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley
Unified School District.
R:\STAFFRPTX232PA~.PC 10/30/96/c~ 43
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Aesthetics
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of
public facilities, including roads.
Payment of Public Facility Fee for road improvements,
traffic impacts, and public facilities.
Post bond @ $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed
$10,000.00, and execute agreement for payment of
Public Facility Fee.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Department.of Public Works.
The project will have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect. No impacts are anticipated.
Provide architectural enhancements to the building and
design the location of loading bays entirely to the rear of
the building.
Building construction plans shall conform substantially
with Exhibit D (Site Plan) and Exhibit F (Color Elevations).
Color and materials used shall conform substantially with
Exhibit H (Color Boards and Materials), or as amended by
the Conditions of Approval for the project.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Department of Planning.
The project will have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect. No impacts are anticipated.
Retain as much of the existing landscaping as possible.
Transplant as many mature trees as possible.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Department of Public Works.
R:~STAFFRPTX232pA~.I}C 10/30/96 klb 44
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect. No impacts are anticipated,
Provide landscaping that enhances front entries and
buffers parking and loading areas.
Landscaping shall be installed in substantial conformance
with Exhibit E (Landscape Plan) or as amended by the
Conditions of Approval. Plant new trees that are 24" box
or larger and are consistent with the existing plantings.
Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy.
Department of Public Works and Department of Planning.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The creation of new light sources will result in increased
light and glare that could affect the Palomar Observatory.
Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance
No. 655.
Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRltI~232PA~.PC 10/30/96 klb 45
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:XSTAFFKFI~32pA96.PC 10/30/96 klb 46
CITY OF TEMECULA
CENTER
NOT TO SCALE
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
'XHIBIT A VICINITY MAP
jl ~'LANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 4, 1996
R:\PLANNINGQ32PA96.R.PT 10/30~6ckd
CITY OF TEMECULA _
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI (Light Industrial)
PROJECT
SITE
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park)
Planning Application No. PA96-0232
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 4, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA
yNEZ ROAD
}lanning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
EXHIBIT - D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 4, 1996
R:\PLANNING'~32pA96.P,2T 1030/96ckd
CITY OF TEMECULA
REAR SLOPE PLANllNG --
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
EXHIBIT - E LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 4, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA
_WEST E_LEVATm~
_noR'r. ELEVATgS
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
c-XHIBIT - F ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 4, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
EXHIBIT - G (1AI FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- November 4, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA
t + t ~ ~
II
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
~XHIBIT - G (1B) FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 4, 1996
R:\STAFFRIq'L?32pA~.l~3 10/30/~ {dlm
CITY OF TEMECULA
® · ~ t t
Planning Application No. PA96-0232 (Development Plan, Fast Track)
EXHIBIT - G (2) FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- November 4, 1996
ITEM #7
MF ~ORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission~/
FROM: Debbie Ubnoske,~lanning Manager
DATE: November 4, 1996
SUBJECT: Design Guidelines
Prepared by: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission:
Review Chapters 4, 5, 6 , 7 and 8 of the Design Guidelines and Provide
Comments and Direction to Staff
BACKGROUND:
This item was last heard by the Planning Commission on October 7, 1996. At that meeting,
the Commission completed their review of Chapter 3. The item was continued to November
4, 1996.
Attachments:
1. Design Guidelines - Blue Page 2
R:~STAFFRPT~DESIGNOL.FC5 10/28/9~edr J~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
DESIGN GUIDELINES
(SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER)