The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About052098 PC AgendaCALL TO ORDER: In compliance with the Americana with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, pieMe contact the office of the Community Development Department st (909) 694-6400. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ermure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA T~le II] TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1998, 6:00 PM 43200 Business Park Drive Council Chambers Temecula, CA 92390 Chairman Fahey Reao Next In Order #98-013 ROLL CALL: Guerriero, Miller, Slaven and Soltysiak PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes for April 1, 1998 and April 15, 1998 3. Southside Specific Plan Workshop PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map) City of Temecula City-wide Several clean-up amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use Plan and Zoning Map and amendments to the Development Code to modify landscape requirements for automobile dealerships, modify side yard requirements for shopping centers, clarify the heights of accessory structures in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and LM zones, adding regulations for temporary construction trailers in residential zones, clarifying side yard storage for vehicles, adding motorcycle parking space dimensions, and adding a requirement for wheel stops in commercial zones Negative Declaration Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner Recommend Approval R:XWHffitERVG\PLANCOMM~AGENDASL~-6-96 5/13/98 vgw 701-16 1 PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 3, 1998, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California ITEM #2 MINUTES FROM APRIL 1, 1998 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1998 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 6:01 P.M., on Wednesday, April 1, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Miller, Soltysiak, and Chairwoman Fahey. Absent: Commissioner Slaven. Also Present: Senior Planner Hogan, Principal Engineer Parks, Attorney Curley, Project Planner Donahoe, Assistant Planner Anders, and Minute Clerk Ballreich. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda MOTION: Commissioner Soltysiak moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Slaven who was absent. 2. ADleroval of March 2. 1998, Minutes It was noted that page 3, last paragraph, should be corrected to reflect Commissioner Slaven versus Commissioner Soltysiak. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to approve the March 2, 1998, Planning Commission minutes as amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Slaven who was absent. 3. Director'$ Hearing Update No additional comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. Planning Aoolication No. PA98-0064 (DeveloPment Plan) Request to construct and operate a 54,225 square foot master planned commercial center, consisting of a 6,550 square foot Mimi's Cafe restaurant, a 21,477 square foot Building "A," a 19,600 square foot Building "B," and a 6,598 square foot Building "C" all designed for retail shops, on five parcels totaling 6.91 acres. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. Project Planner Donahoe reviewed, in detail, the staff report (as per agenda material). With regard to Condition No. 16 (reciprocal access and parking agreements), Ms. Donahoe advised that although the applicant had noted that, as per the CC&Rs, each parcel is required to provide on-site parking, staff would continue to recommend the imposition of Condition No. 16. With regard to Condition No. 71 b. (Install street lights on Winchester Road as determined by the Director of Public Works), Ms. Donahoe advised that the Public Works Department has requested to delete this condition. Because the site currently has five parcels, Project Planner Donahoe, for Chairwoman Fahey, advised that the applicant proposed to do a parcel merger and/or a lot line adjustment in order to accommodate this project. In order for Rancho California Water to achieve access to the well site, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that the Department is requiring an easement. With regard to Condition No. 57 (FEMA requirements), Deputy Director of Public Works Parks provided, for Commissioner Soltysiak, additional clarification, noting that staff is of the opinion that the site is adequate and out of the Flood Hazard area. With regard to Condition No. 91 (posting of street address), Commissioner Miller requested that this condition be amended to reflect buildings versus building and that the address be placed in a clearly visible location on the buildings. For Commissioner Miller, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted that no designated use has been determined for the transportation corridor and that he would not envision there to be a use for quite some time. In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Parks advised that the applicant has agreed to pay for the installation of a stop sign in front of the Chevron gas station but that staff is awaiting permission from the property owner for this installation. For Chairwoman Fahey, Senior Planner Hogan advised that the amount of landscaping for the transportation corridor was included in the 21% landscape calculation for the site, noting that as per the Design Guidelines, easements are included in the landscaping total. Mr. Jack Stouse, applicant, 41661 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 217, commended staff on their efforts associated with this project; advised that in order to ensure proper truck access for future retail uses, he would envision the type of businesses which would require the use of smaller trucks; and noted that for architectural and aesthetic reasons, a plaza area was created in order to separate the two buildings. Speaking in support of the architectural design of the project, Commissioner Miller requested that the brightness of the roof for Mimi's Cafe be toned down. With regard to landscaping calculation, he suggested, for future developments, that this calculation only include fee site and not easements. Considering the site location, Chairwoman Fahey, echoed by Commissioner Soltysiak, spoke in support of the architectural design of this project. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. 98-0064; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. 98-0064; and to adopt Resolution No. 98-007 approving Planning Application No. 98-0064 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, amended as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 98-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98o0064 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN o WINCHESTER MARKETPLACE) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 54,225 SQUARE FOOT MASTER PLANNED COMMERCIAL CENTER ON 6.18 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD (STATE HIGHWAY 709 NORTH) BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSO R'S' PARCEL NOS. 910-290-003, -004, -005, -006, AND -007 Delete - Condition No. 71 b. (install street lights on Winchester Road as determined by the Director of Public Works); Amend - Condition No. 91 (street address, reflecting the word buildings instead of building; The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Slaven who was absent. 5. Planning Application No. PA98-0029 (Conditional Use Permit) Request to design, construct, and operate a 6,222 square foot fast-food restaurant with a drive-through and associated parking and landscaping. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. Reviewing the proposed project, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the manager of Togo's has expressed a concern with regard to the width of Del Rio access road and its inability to accommodate future traffic generated by this approval and advised that the string lighting and turquoise poles, as reflected in the colored photograph, are not being proposed for the subject site. Ms. Anders noted that staff is recommending the deletion of Condition No. 77 (the applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated February 12, 1998, and clarified that the curb and gutter along the 30' access easement road, as reflected on the Site Plan, does not exist. Although the subject site has been previously graded, Assistant Planner Anders noted that the site would generally have to be resurveyed because it has been 15 years since the site was initially graded but that this request could possibly be waived by a records search and/or a site walk. With regard to the 30' easement which ties into the signal at Del Rio Road, Public Works Deputy Director Parks stated that although a 40' easement would be preferred, the provided 30' will be sufficient and that the applicant could not be conditioned to provide an additional 10'. As to Condition No. 74 (flood protection), Public Works Deputy Director Parks advised that the finished floor will have to be raised by 1.7 feet, which may require grade adjustments of the Site Plan. Mr. Russell Rumansoff, representing the applicant, 7395 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, advised that as per the traffic engineer, the driveway approach should adequately accommodate the proposed development without widening or providing additional stacking; relayed concurrence with staff's recommended conditions of approval; and advised that Rosa's Cafe is the business's registered trademark name. Mr. Rumansoff noted that the project will reflect no exposed mechanical equipment on the outside of the building and stated, for Chairwoman Fahey, that the proposed neon tubes are in keeping with the architectural design of the building. For Commissioner Soltysiak, Mr. Rumansoff advised that the newly proposed driveway to the south will function as right in and right out only. Reviewing the proposed landscaping, Mr. Vince Di Donsto, landscaping architect, provided clarification as to the location of the existing three sycamore trees as well as the proposed palm trees to which Commissioner Miller requested that for safety reasons, larger palm trees be planted. 4 Commenting on the limited accessibility to this site, Mr. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the property owner to the north, relayed this business owner's concern with exiting traffic backing up onto the driveway, interfering with ingress movement. He, therefore, requested that the driveway be expanded or at least widened to 35' - 40' on the north side, expressing a willingness to widen the portion of the driveway, on the north side, by approximately 3' or to the extent possible without having to relocate the existing monument sign. Mr. Rumansoff advised that it was determined that as future developments are built, the traffic impacts at the easement/intersection would have to be mitigated at that time. Mr. Rumansoff reiterated that the Planning Department Staff had concurred that the proposed 30' access easement would be adequate to service the balance of the site. Relaying her opposition to the use of neon tubes, Chairwoman Fahey expressed concern with regard to the width of the access easement; suggested that alternatives be reviewed; and, therefore, concurred with Commissioner Guerriero to continue this item to a future Planning Commission meeting. In response to Commissioner Soltysiak, Public Works Deputy Director Parks clarified that no interim traffic control measures (restricting left-turn movements) are being proposed for the southerly driveway. Mr. Parks suggested the approval of the project subject to a condition requiring the applicant to provide a 40' wide access easement (driveway) with the applicant dedicating an additional 10'. For Commissioner Guerriero who had suggested the installation of meandering sidewalks in an effort to save the existing trees, Mr. Parks advised that the location, possible salvaging, or replacement of the existing Sycamore trees will be addressed~ with the applicant, during the Precise Grading Plan. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue this Agenda Item to a future Planning Commission meeting in order for staff to address the widening of the driveway and the status of the existing trees. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller. (This motion was ultimately withdrawn.) In an effort to address the Commissioners' concerns, Mr. Rumansoff relayed a willingness to increase the width of the existing access easement (on the applicant's side) by 5' for the first 100' (heading east), Commissioner Guerriero withdrew his earlier motion with Commissioner Miller, the seconder of the motion, concurring. Commissioner Miller reiterated his desire that the applicant make a qualified effort to save the existing trees. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0029; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0029; and to adopt Resolution No. 98-008 approving Planning Application No. PA98-0029 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, amended as follows: RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0029 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 6,222 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON 1.70 ACRES) AND (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT THE OPERATION OF A FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET, SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF DEL RIO ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-060-034 Delete Condition No. 77 (recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal} Add that for public safety reasons, taller queen palm trees (at least 8' high) be planted at the entrance; that the Public Works Department determine if the existing Sycamore trees are salvageable; if they are not at the current location, that an arbor)st be consulted to determine whether or not these trees could survive at another location. that the applicant increase the width of the existing access easement (on the applicant's side) by 5' for the first 100'. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Slaven who was absent;. 6. Planning Aoolication No. PA98-0012 (Development Plan Revision) Request to replace 15,625 square feet of retail space with the construction of a 23,462 square foot Michaels retail store and 23,500 square feet of retail space for a future tenant, in two phases. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. Project Planner Donahoe proceeded with a detailed overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the proposed resolution should be corrected to accurately reflect the replacement of 10.480 square feet of retail space versus 15,625 square feet; that Michaels parking will be to the east and north; and that the overall site is overparked. Viewing the current circulation of this particular Center as inadequate, Chairwoman Fahey expressed concern as to how the proposed project will further impact this situation and stated that additional traffic improvements will be necessary. Mr. David Thomas, 633 Ranch Drive, San Diego, representing the applicant, clarified that Michaels will be relocating from its current Temecula site to the proposed location. In order to properly address truck accessibility into the Center, Mr. Thomas advised that the existing exterior/interior Center signs were redesigned. Mr. Thomas noted that negotiations for the other retail space (23,500 square feet) have not been finalized and that with regard to landscaping, Mr. Thomas advised that 52,000 square feet of landscaping will be provided for the subject site (total Center landscaping is 291,000 square feet). With regard to landscaping, Commissioner Miller noted that additional landscaping should be required in front of the site as well as in the back, stating that at least half of the back area should be planted. As to the planting of additional trees in back of Michaels, Mr. Thomas apprised the Commissioners of a condition of Michaels' lease, which requires adequate freeway visibility. Considering the amount of increased traffic as a result of this project, Commissioner Guerriero noted that left-hand turn arrows are needed at both traffic signals on Ynez Road and, therefore, requested that the Traffic Commission address this matter. In response to Commissioner Guerriero's comment to eliminate parking spots in order to improve the circulation concern, Mr. +Thomas noted that such a recommendation would not be economically feasible. With regard to the interior/exterior signs, Commissioner Guerriero stated that they may be too small in size. MOTION: Commissioner Soltysiak moved to close the public hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 98-009 approving Planning Application No. PA98-0012 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval with the following addition: RESOLUTION NO. 98-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-O012 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION), THE REPLACEMENT OF 10,480 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE WITH THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 23,462 SQUARE FOOT ARTS AND CRAFTS RETAIL STORE AND 23,500 SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL RETAIL SPACE, IN TWO PHASES, ON 26.69 ACRES, LOCATED AT 27511 YNEZ ROAD, IN THE TOWER PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-270-034 Add that additional landscaping be provided in the front and back of the subject site and that staff work with the applicant to ensure tenant requirements are met with regard to clear freeway visibility. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Slaven who was absent. At 8:22 P.M., Chairwoman Fahey called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 8:32 P.M. Planning Aoolication No. PA97-0327 {Tentative Parcel MaD No. 28657) Request to reparcelize 58 acres of industrial property, which is a portion of Tentative Parcel Map No. 24086, into nine {9) lots, in two (2) phases. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. Commissioner Soltysiak advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this Agenda Item. Project Planner Donahoe presented the staff report (of record), advising that Section 2 G. of the resolution be amended as follows: "that the design ... and from Diaz Road with the exception of two restrictive right-in and riaht-out access olaeninas for iparcels I and 6 resDectively. Mr. Bill Dendy, applicant, 41975 Winchester Road, informed the Commissioners that he as well as the project engineer and consultant were present to answer any questions. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0327; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0327; and adopt Resolution No. 98-010, as amended per staff, approving Planning Application No. PA97-0327 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28657, Amended No. 5) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. RESOLUTION NO. 98-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0327 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28657, AMENDED NO.5)TO SUBDIVIDE 58 ACRES INTO NINE PARCELS LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF REMINGTON AND DIAZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 909-370-009, -005, AND 909-120-021 The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Slaven who was ~bsent and Commissioner Soltysiak who abstained. PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT A. Senior Planner Hogan reminded the Commissioners of the upcoming Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, April 21, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. Commissioner Guerriero requested that the formulation of a Tree Preservation Policy be placed on the agenda of this joint meeting. COMMISSIONER REPORTS A. Commissioner Miller requested that a letter of commendation be sent, on behalf of the Planning Commission, to CDM WestMar for the recent upgrades completed at the Winchester/Ynez Road strip center. ADJOURNMENT At 8:49 P.M., Chairwoman Fahey formally adjourned this meeting to the April 15, 1998, Planning Commission meeting at 7:00 P.M. Linda Fahey, Chairwoman Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager MINUTES FROM APRIl, 15, 1998 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 15, 1998 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 6:03 P.M., on Wednesday, April 15, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also Present: PUBLIC COMMENTS None. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda Commissioners Guerriero, Miller, Slaven, and Chairwoman Fahay. Commissioner Soltysiak. Planning Manager Ubnoske, Senior Planner Hogan, Principal Engineer Parks, Attorney Curley, Project Planner De Gange, and Minute Clerk Ballreich. MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Planning AoDlication No. PA98-0066 (Development Plan - Fast Track) Request to construct a 130,900 square foot industrial building on a 6.49 acre site. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. Project Planner De Gange presented the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that the proposed resolution should be corrected to accurately reflect Bostik, Inc.; that there will be no hazardous waste removal from the site; that Phase 1 of this project provides sufficient landscaping and that the landscaping for Phase 1 will coincide with the landscaping for Phase 2; that the temporary landscaping will be retained in boxes located against the wall; and that the slope will be planted and maintained by the master developer, noting that additional trees are being proposed along the upper portion of the slope. With regard to the temporary landscaping, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the Commission may impose a condition requiring the applicant to make the temporary landscaping permanent if Phase 2 of the development has not been constructed within 13 months of the completion of Phase 1. Describing the function and need of the proposed tower, Mr. Ed Lui, applicant, advised that the tower will be 65' high; noted that any noise-related impacts would be retained within the site; that no explosive materials will be stored on site; voiced no objection to the imposition of a condition with regard to making the temporary landscaping permanent, advising that it would be anticipated to begin construction on Phase 2 in 1999. To address any potential outside noise concerns, Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested the imposition of a condition requiring the applicant to conduct an acoustical study upon completion and operation; at which time, additional landscaping could be required in order to mitigate any concerns. MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98~0066 (Development Plan); adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0066 (Development Plan); and to adopt Resolution No. 98-011 approving Planning Application No. PA98-0066 (Development Plan) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report and subject to Conditions of Approval, including the following additional Conditions: Add that an acoustical study be conducted upon completion and operation to ensure the ambient noise level falls within the parameters of the General Plan; that if the noise levels exceed the allowable limit, mitigation requirements will be imposed; that the temporary landscaping will become permanent if Phase 2 has not been constructed 13 months after the completion of Phase 1; that the resolution be corrected to accurately reflect Bostik, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0066 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 130,900 A SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING, ASSOCIATED PARKING, LANDSCAPING, HARDSCAPE, AND IMPROVEMENTS ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 6.49 ACRES LOCATED AT 27460 BOSTIK COURT (FORMERLY SPRINGFIELD COURT)SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF BOSTIK COURT AND WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-320-042 The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exceDtion of Commissioner Soltysiak who was abserlt. 3. Planning Application No. PA98-0045 (DeveloPment Plan) Request to design, construct, and operate a two-story, 85,390 square foot office/warehouse building with associated parking and landscaping on a 4.45 acre site. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. By way of a rendering, Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material). Mr. Scott Staley of Lusardi Construction, applicant, informed the Commissioners that he was present and available to answer any questions. Commissioner Slaven commended the applicant on the architectural design of the building. MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0045; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0045; and to adopt Resolution No. PC 98-012 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. 3 RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0045 TO CONSTRUCT ANY OPERATE A 85,390 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 4.45 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF REMINGTON AVE., EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF REMINGTON AVE. AND WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-120- 057. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exceDtion of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent. PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting will be Tuesday, April 21, 1998, at 8:00 P.M. COMMISSION REPORTS None. ADJOURNMENT At 6:48 P.M., Chairwoman Fahey formally adjourned the meeting to the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, April 21, 1998, at 8:00 P.M. The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting will be Wednesday, May 6, 1998. Linda Fahey, Chairwoman Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager 4 ITEM #3 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: DATE: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner~ May 20, 1998 SUBJECT: Southside Specific Plan Workshop RECOMMENDATION Request input from the Planning Commission on the proposed Land Use Plan, Permitted Uses, the Goals and Objectives, or any other related issues. BACKGROUND The City's General Plan designated the project area as Specific Plan. The general goal of the Specific Plan is to visually and economically revitalize the Southside area by taking advantage of the fleeway access and visibility, and proximity to Old Town and the Creek. The Specific Plan will attempt to pave the way for incorporated development in terms of architecture and landscaping, a unified streetscape design, and uses that would complement and serve Old Town, the residents, and the tourists. After completing the consultant selection process, Urban Design Studio (UDS) was selected to prepare the City initiated Southside Specific Plan. The process for the preparation of the Specific Plan started by holding two community meetings with the property owners, merchants, and other interested parties. Personal interviews were also held with interested parties that artended the first community meeting. A survey was also conducted to obtain additional information regarding the desires of the property and business owners in the area. Attachments: Proposed Land Use Plan - Blue Page 2 Permitted Uses - Blue Page 3 Goals and Objectives and Vision Plan- Blue Page 4 R:XNAASEHSXSOLrFHSID~WORKSHOP.PCI 5/14/98~n I ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN Southside Area conceptual Vision CITY OF TEMECULA High Densit~ -Single Family Multi-Family(20 du~ac) -Family Day Ca~e-Public and Religious Institutions-Nou-Profit Clubs and Meeting Halls-Bed and Breakfast Open Space -Limitca AgTicditural Uses(e.g. Farmers Public Institutional -- -Public Institutions and Offices -Cultural Uses -Educational Uses -Parks and Recreation I Commuoivf Commercial -Retail Commercial(e.g. Mereado, Farmers Market, Grocery, Drag Store, Nurseries, Etc.) -CUltural htstimtious -Artist Studios and Live/Work Uses -Service Uscs(c.g. Banks, Barbers, Cleaners, Etc.) -Eating and Drinking Establishments -Recreation, Community Services, and Education Uses Service Commercial · 'Y ..... *Limited Automobile Related Uses ~ ! .... -Eating Establislunents !:,. ~._ _, _ -- .... Limited Light IndusWial Uses i I -Retail Commercial ' ' ~ .... I -Service Uses -Limited Medical Services -Governmental and Professional Offices -Limited Eating Establishments -Artist Studios PREFERRED CONCEPT hway-Oriented Commercial -Automobile Service Stations -Convemcnce Stores -Rcstaunnts -Office -Traveler-Ol~ented Lodgnng -park-N-Ride ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PERMITTED USES R:XNAASEHS~SOUTHS1D~WORKSHOp.pC15/14/98 m 3 CiTY OF TEHECULA Section C · Permitted Land Use Matrix The following Land Use Matrix (Figure 3- b) provides the recommended uses in each of the seven (7) land use categories within the Specific Plan area. The provisions contained in this section apply not only to the primary use of property, but also to each accessory and support use. A conditionally permitted use requires approval of a permit by the Planning Commission in compliance with Chapter 17.04 of the City of Temecula Development Code. When a particular use is unlisted, the Community Development Director shall be responsible to make a use determination to decide f the proposed use is similar to a listed use. Unless the proposed use is determined to be similar to a listed use, it shall be a prohibited use. Key To Land Use Matrix: P = Permitted Uses C = Conditionally Permitted Uses -- = Prohibited Uses HOC = Highway-Oriented Commercial District SC = Service Commercial District C:C = Community Commercial District O -- Office District HDR = High Density Residential District p/T = Public/InstitutionaF District OS = Open Space District In addition to the above symbols, references to special notes have been included at the bottom of the following pages. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards CITY OF TEMECULA Southside Specific Plan Page 6 Figure 3-b: Land Use Matrix Automotive Related Uses Automobile Parts Sales, no installations Automobile Parts Sales, with installations Automobile Rental Automobile Repair Services Automobile Service Stations, with no alcohol sales Automobile Service Stations, with sales of beer ancl/or wineI Car Wash, full service2 Car Wash, self service3 HOC SC CC O P/I HDR OS P C ..... C C ..... Communications, Utilities and Transportation Antennas/Cellular/Microwave (not including noncommercial television antennas) Communications Equipment Sales Parking Lots and Parking Structures, including park and ride lots Public and Private Utility Facilities (regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) Tan and Limousine Service Transit Centers and Stations C HOC SC CC O P/I HDR OS C C P P -- _ C C -- C P P C P C C Community Services, Recreation, Education, Open Space and Cultural Uses Aerobics/Dance/Gymnastics/ Jazzercise/Martial Arts Studios (less than 5,000 sq. ft.) C C ..... C C C C C~ C' C1 HOC SC CC O p/T HDR OS P P P C ~Consistent with Se~ion 17.08.050(g) of the City of Temecula Development Code. 2Consistent with 5ection 17,08.050(d) of the City of Temecula Development Code. 3Consistent with Section 17.08.050(d) of the City of Temecula Development Code. 4Limited to bus stops. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards CZTY OF TEMECULA .............................................................................................................................. Community Servicest Recreation, Education, Open Space and Cultural Uses Aerobics/Dance/Gymnastic8/ Jazzercise/Martial Arts Studios (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.) Arcades (Pinball and Video Games)s Auditoriums, Community Centers and Conference Facilities Billlard Parlor/Pool Hall Bowling Alley Educational Institutions Equestrian Facilities (i.e. trails, staging areas, riding stables, etc.) Farmers Markets Health and Exercise Clubs (less than 5,000 square feet) Health and Exercise Clubs (greater than 5,000 square feet) Libraries, Museums, and Galleries (public, not-for-profit) Libraries, Museums, and Galleries (Private) Membership Clubs, Organizations, and Lodges Movie Theaters Parks, Playgrounds, Community Gardens, Picnic Grounds, Nature Centers and Bicycle Trails Police/Sheriff and Fire Stations Religious Institutions7 Sports and Recreational Facilities HOC SC CC O P/I HDR OS P P C C C C C C C C C -- -- C -- C p -- p .... C C P P C C -- .... C -- C -- -- C -- C -- C P P P C -- -- -- P P P P P P P C -- C C C C -- -- -- C C C C -- C -- C C C .... P P P P P P P p p6 ps p p p3 __ C C C C P C -- C C C C C C C 5Consistent with Section 17.08.050© of the City of Temecula Development Code. Game arcades limited to five (5) games/machines when located as an auxiliary use in an otherwise permitted use. 6Limited to neighborhood-based community-oriented policing centers. ~Consistent with Section 17.06.050(p) of the City of Temecula Development Code. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards CITY OF TEHECULA Southside Specific Plan ........................................................ Page 8 Eating and Drinking Establishments HOC SC CC O P/Z HDR OS Alcohol Service in conjunction with C C C restaurants Ice Cream Parlor P P P P -- -- __ Microbreweries9 C C C Restaurant, without drive-thrus P P P P C -- -- Restaurant, with drive-thrus~° C ...... Restaurant, with lounge or live C C C entertainmenttl Sandwich Shops/Delicatessen P P P P C -- -- Sidewalk Cares -- C C C -- -- Wine Tasting C -- C -- C -- -- Health and Well Being Services HOC SC CC O P/Z HDR OS Alcoholism or Drug Treatment Facilities C C C C -- P -- Children's Home (Orphanage) .... C C -- Community, Care Facilities P P P p __ __ __ Community Health Clinics -- -- -- P p -- __ Congregate Care Housing for the Elderly12 P -- -- P C P -- Congregate Living Health Facility C -- -- C C -- -- Day Care Centers C C P C P C -- Day Care Health Center -- -- C C P -- -- Drug Abuse Recovery or Treatment -- -- -- C C -- -- Center Emergency Shelters C C C C C -- -- Facilities for the Mentally Disordered, -- -- -- C C P -- Handicapped, or Dependent or Neglected Children sConsistent with Section 17.08.050(g) of the City of Temecula Development Code. 9Consistent with 5ectjon 17.08.050(g) of the City of Temecula Development Code, : °Consistent with Section 17.08.050(m) of the City of Temecula Development Code. ~ ~Consistent with 5ection 17.08.050(b) of the CiW of Temecula Development Code. ~2Consistent with Section 17.06.050(h) of the City of Temecula Development Code. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards CITY OF TEHECULA .............................................................................................................................. 9 Health and Well Being Services HOC SC CC O P/I HDR Family Day Care Homes, small" ..... P Family Day Care Homes, largeu ..... C Health Care Facility P -- P P C -- Hospitals C -- C C C -- Nursing Homes/Convalescent Homes C -- -- C P -- Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly C -- C C C P Skilled Nursing Facilities C -- -- C C -- NOTE: Retail COmmercial uses shall be consistent with Section 17.08.050(I) of the City of Temecula Development Code. OS O$ Antique Sales P P P Apparel and Accessory Shops P P P Art Galleries and Studios P P P P -- -- -- Art Supply Stores P P P Bakery Retail P P P Bicycle Sales, Rentals, and Services -- P P Bookstores P P P Camera Shop -- P P Candy/Confectionary Sales P P P Clothing SaIes P P P Coins, Purchase and Sales -- P P Computer Sales and Services -- P P P ~ -- -- Convenience Market C C C C -- -- -- FlorisliGift Shop P P P P -- -- -- General Merchandise Retail Store (less P P C than 10,000 square feet) Grocery/Drug Store/Pharmacy P P P P -- -- -- Hardware Stores -- P P Hobby Supply Shop -- P P ~'3Consistent with Section 17.06.0500) of the City of Temecula Development Code. ~4Consistent 'th Section 17.06.0500) of the City of Temecula Development Code. w~ Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards CTrY OF TEMECULA S~_h,S!d~.~Pe**c, if,.i(~.!~la.n ........................................................................................................................... P~g..e,..~O Retail Commercial HOC SC CC O Liquor StoresIs C C -- -- Medical Equipment Sales/Rental P P P P Nurseries (Retail) C -- C -- Office Supplies/Equipment P P C P Paint, Tile, Glass, Mirror and Wallpaper P P C -- Retail Sales Pet Shop/Pet Grooming P P P -- Postal Services P P P P -- Specialty Food Stores, including health -- P P -- -- foods Swimming Pool Supplies/Equipment Sales P P -- -- -- Tobacco Shop P P C -- -- Vending Machine Sales and Service -- P -- -- -- Residential Uses Boarding, Rooming, and Lodging Facilities P/I HDR OS C -- C HOC SC CC O P/I HDR OS ..... C -- P P ..... C C .... P ..... p Duplex Manufactured Homes Mixed Use Developments, including C -- C C -- residential and office/retail/service components either within the same structure or on the same parcel (residential may include senior citizen housing) Mobile Home Park Multiple Family Housingxs Secondary Dwelling Unit~9 xsConsistent with Section 17.08.050(g) of the City of Temecula Development Code. z sConsistent with Section 17,06.050(i) of the City of Temecula Development Code. "~Limited to neighborhood-sewing retail uses (i.e. small-scale grocery and general merchandise). No alcohol or tobacco sales permitted. Subject to strict design review and standards. ~ sConsistent with Sections 17.06.050(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of the City of Temecula Development Code. : ~Consistent with Section 17.06.050(m) of the City of Temecula Development Code. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards CITY OF TEMECULA ........................................................................................................................... a9e..Z.Z Residential Uses HOC SC CC O P/I HDR OS Senior Citizen Housing~ C -- C -- -- P -- Single Family Attached (greater than two ..... P -- units,) Transitional Housing ..... P -- Service Uses HOC SC CC O P/I HDR OS Animal Hospital/Shelter P P C .... Banks, Credit Unions, and Financial -- P P P -- -- -- Institutions Bed and Breakfast21 C -- C Blueprint, Duplicating and Copying P P -- P -- -- -- Services Butcher Shop -- P P Cabinet Shop (no outdoor storage) -- P Catering Services P P P Fortune Telling or Similar Activity C C C Funeral Parlors and Mortuaries P P ..... Home Occupations ..... C -- Hotels and Motels P Laundromat C C C Mail Order Businesses -- P P Maintenance and Repair Services, indoor -- P P only (i.e. carpet and rug cleaning, watch repair, household and small appliance repairs, locksmith, TVNCR repair, upholstery shop, antique restoration, etc.) Offices, Administrative or Corporate P C C P -- -- -- Headquarters Offices, Governmental P C C P C -- -- 2°Consistent with Section 17.06.050(h) of the City of Temecula Development Code. 2 ~Consistent with Section 17.06.050(q) of the City of Temecula Development Code. 2:Nlay be developed in conjunction with a cafe, coffee shop, delicatessen or other small-scale eating establishment upon strict design review and standards. Chapter S Land Use and Development Standards CTrY OF TEHECULA Southside Specific Plan Page 3.2 Service Uses Offices, Professional (i.e., Business, Law, Medical, Dental, Veterinarian, Chiropractic, Architectural, Financial, Interior Design, Engineenng, Real Estate, Insurance, etc.) Personal Services (i.e. barber and beauty shops, tailor shop, dry cleaners, travel agent, photographic studio, etc.) Pest Control Services Printing and Publishing Services (i.e. newspaper, periodicals, books, etc.) Recreational Vehicle Parks Recycling Collection Facilities Studios, sound and picture (i.e., Musical and Recording Studio, Motion Picture Studio, Radio and Broadcasting Studios/Offices, etc.) HOC $C CC O P/I HDR OS P C C P -- -- -- P P P P -- C -- P -- p C P C -- C -- C C -- C -- -- Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards ATTACHMENT NO. 3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES R:~qAASEHSx, SOUTHSID\WORKSHOP.PCI 5/14198~n 4 CZTY OF TEMECULA S...°.~..th.S.!,d..~-S.P~i~iE,.P!~.n ............................................................................................................................. ~a.g~. 2 Section C · Goals, Objectives and Policies Based on the in.formation received from the community, as well as issues and desires identified by the City, goals, objectives, and policies were developed to prioritize and organize the future actions to revitalize the Southside area. The following goals, objectives and policies are intended to provide a framework for the preparation of the Southside Specific Plan. Overall Goal l, qsually and economically revitalize Southside by establishing a long term identity that relates to the freeway, Old Town, proposed Westside Entertainment Center, local residents, and the creek. This will be accomplished by integrating the tourist-oriented and resident- serving uses with visually pleasing streetscape and unified architecture to create a place inviting to both motorists and pedestrians. In an effort to further define and prioritize the overall goal statement, the following Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CZTY OF TEMECULA Southside Specific Plan Page 3 goals, objectives and policies are provided for focused areas of concern. Land Use and Economic Vitality -- LU/EV LU/EV Goal -- Create a balanced range of land uses that serves and complements Old Town and the proposed Westside Entertainment Center as well as serving the residents of Temecula. These uses should cater to both residents and tourists alike and should be designed to take advantage of the views, the creek, and the freeway. LU/EV Objective 1 -- Expand the commercial base in the Southside Area by taking advantage of the area's proximity to and accessibility and visibility from Interstate 15 and State Route 79, and the natural setting provided by Murrieta Creek and the views of the mountains and other surrounding areas through appropriate incentives and regulation. LU/EV Policy 1-A -- Encourage land uses that benefit from easy freeway access to concentrate along south Front Street, near the interchange of Interstate 15 and State Route 79. LU/EV Policy 1-B -- Promote a cohesive land use along north Front Street mix that creates positive synergy with Old Town. LU/EV Policy 1-C -- Incorporate flexibility within the Specific Plan to permit unique land uses, including but not limited to the following, on the west side of Front Street which attract people to the area and serve as activity generators: Restaurants and cafes; · Family entertainment uses; · Agriculture-oriented "people-stoppers," such as fruit stands, open air market, garden center, petting zoo, or wind vendor cooperative; Lodging uses, including hotels, motels, resort, bed and breakfast; Small-scale, bungalow styled professional offices; Equestrian-oriented uses, including a horse staging area; Art galleries, book stores, and other cultural activities; Hispanic mercado marketplace; and, Live/work development for artists, professionals, crafts persons, etc. LU/EV Policy 1-D -- Through site plan and development review, encourage all new development along the west side of Front Street to facilitate access to and be oriented towards Murrieta Creek and the mountains through the provision of decks, windows, patios and plazas, open-air activities, and other features. LU/EV Policy 1-E -- Rename the proposed Western Bypass Road and provide adequate signage that attracts and directs motorists traveling on Interstate 15 to Old Town, and therefore, increases traffic through the Southside area. Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CZTY OF TEMECULA ............................................................................................................................. LU/EV Objective 2 -- Accommodate new development that serves tourists, the community at-large and the Pujol Street neighborhood. LU/EV Policy 2-A -- Consider undertaking a market analysis to identify retail and service uses which could be located along Front Street to meet the needs of surrounding residents, area businesses and visitors. LU/EV Policy 2-B -- Identify and implement strategies for attracting local and visitor populations into the Southside area. LU/EV Policy 2-C -- Provide for a variety of unique cultural, professional office, entertainment, retail, lodging, restaurant, recreational and other uses which appeal to all ages. LU/EV Policy 2-D -- Identify and encourage opportunities within the Southside area for new plazas, greens, and parks that attract people and activities during the day and night. LU/EV Policy 2-E -- Accommodate more neighborhood-serving uses within walking distance of the residential neighborhoods along Pujol Street. LU/EV Objective 3 -- Identify measures for attracting new businesses and retaining appropriate businesses in the Southside Area. LU/EV Policy 3-A -- Identify development incentives, building process streamlining opportunities, and loan assistance programs to facilitate new investment and reinvestment in the Southside area. LU/EV Policy 3-B -- Pursue Economic Development and Administration loans and grants for site preparation and public works construction that will help spur new business location and economic development in the Southside area. LU/EV Policy 3-C -- Pursue opportunities through California redevelopment law to enhance the area and improve its attractiveness to existing and new business. LU/EV Policy 3-D -- With the assistance of the Chamber of Commerce and area business and property owners, prepare a marketing program for the Southside area that promotes its businesses and other amenities. LU/EV Objective 4 -- Integrate existing residential neighborhoods with adjacent areas and continue to provide a wide range of diverse housing opportunities. LU/EV Policy 4oA -- Identify opportunities -- through signage, community events, pedestrian connections, land use patterns, new development, circulation improvements and streetscape design -- to create or enhance linkages between the Pujol Street residential neighborhood, Old Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CZTY OF TEHECULA .............................................................................................................................. Town, Southside and the proposed Westside Entertainment Center. LU/EV Policy 4-B -- Continue the designation of appropriate areas with General Plan land uses that permit a mix of housing types in Southside, as well as supporting commercial, recreational, institutional and open space uses. LU/EV Policy 4-C -- Ensure that new development adjacent to the existing Pujol Street neighborhood is of compatible scale and character with the residential uses. Circulation -- CIRC CIRC Goal -- Facilitate efficient and safe movement of people and vehicles within and through the Southside area and provide adequate parking. CIRC Objective 1 -- Provide for efficient movement of vehicular traffic. CIRC Policy 1-A -- Minimize points of ingress and egress along Front Street by encouraging shared drive aisles between parcels. CIRC Policy 1-B -- Create well- defined pedestrian crossings and bicycle lanes throughout the Front Street corridor. CIRC Policy 1-C -- Upgrade and improve portions of Front Street that are susceptible to flooding. CIRC Policy 1-D -- Erect a Welcome to Old Town sign that directs people into Southside and Old Town areas. CIRC Policy 1-E -- Facilitate accessibility into and out of the Southside area in the design and development of First Street intersection improvements with Santiago Road/First Street and State Route 79/Interstate 15 Interchange. CIRC Objective 2 -- Provide for safe and efficient pedestrian movement. CIRC Policy 2-A -- Identify locations for potential pedestrian crossings over Murrieta Creek, emphasizing a physical pedestrian connection between the Pujol Street neighborhoods and the Southside area. CIRC Policy 2-B -- Encourage an integrated pedestrian system throughout Southside, including sidewalks, trails, transit stops and plazas, that encourage walking within the area. CIRC Policy 2-C -- Construct remaining segments of the sidewalk system along Front Street, including the provision of pedestrian amenities such as bus shelters, special paving patterus, street trees, and a wayfinding signage system. CIRC Policy 2-D -- Identify and pursue funding sources for the construction and maintenance of creek crossings. Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CZTY OF TEHECULA CIRC Policy 2-E -- Identify opportunities to enhance linkages with the Pujol Street residential neighborhoods and to increase the overall pedestrian-orientation of land uses in the Southside area. CIRC Policy 2-F -- Identify and provide opportunities via new development to link street-oriented sidewalk systems with future developed creek-oriented trails. CIRC Objective 3 -- Facilitate alternate forms of transportation within the Southside area. CIRC Policy 3-A -- Work in conjunction with Southern California Edison and area property owners to identify an appropriate site near the SR 79 and 1-15 Interchange for an Electrical Vehicle (EV) Recharging Station. CIRC Policy 3-B -- Provide for equestrian trails within the Murrieta Creek corridor, including the location of a horse staging area. CIRC Policy 3-C -- Encourage new development to include bicycle racks and storage areas. CIRC Policy 3-D -- Identify a location in conjunction with CalTrans, ff appropriate, to site a park-n-ride lot near the SR 79 and 1-15 Interchange. CIRC Objective 4 -- Consider the potential circulation impacts of future interchange improvements on the economic vitality of the Southside area to ensure that sufficient vehicular activity is sustained on Front Street to support area businesses. CIRC Policy 4-A -- Undertake a baseline traffic analysis, including traffic counts, for the Southside area prior to commencing construction of any future interchange improvements affecting the Southside area. CIRC Policy 4-B -- Implement a program to regularly monitor vehicular circulation in the Southside area during and for some period after construction of any future interchange improvements affecting the Southside area. CIRC Policy 4-C -- Incorporate, wherever possible, the concerns and ideas of property owners, merchants, and residents of the Southside area into the design, development and maintenance of any future interchange improvements affecting the Southside area. CIRC Policy 4-D -- Ensure that non-vehicular circulation is not impaired by any future interchange improvements affecting the Southside area. Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CTrY OF TEMECULA Southside Specific Plan Page 7 Urban Design/Zmage -- UD/Z UD/I Goal -- Enhance physical elements and landscaping attributes within the Southside area that will contribute to a renewed image and identity, serve to attract new development, and contribute to increased activity by visitors and residents. UD/I Objective 1 -- Promote a pedestrian atmosphere along Front Street and the creek. UD/I Policy 1-A -- Implement the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan for the Southside area, and identif~ additional opportunities for the provision of plazas and other public spaces within new development, along Front Street and along the creek. UD/I Policy 1-B -- To create a pedestrian-oriented streetscape and maintain a continuous street edge, reduce the number of drive aisles by encouraging shared access and parking among adjacent uses. UD/I Policy 1-C -- Develop and implement a streetscape plan for Front Street which includes the following components: Improved sidewalks with street trees and decorative lighting; Decorative improvements, monuments and arches creating a gateway at the northern and southern points of Front Street within the Southside area; Building facade improvements, including the installation of awnings and improved signage; Boulevard atmosphere that serves as a linkage to Old Town, Murrieta Creek, and other key pedestrian destinations; Create prominent gateway entrances at the north and south ends of Front Street to attract travelers into the Southside area; and, Establish a cohesive directional signage system at the SR-79/Front Street intersection and along Front Street to facilitate motorists' and pedestrians' awareness of the location of businesses and areas of interest in the Southside area. UD/I Policy 1-D -- Encourage appropriate uses to orient development toward the creek. UD/I Policy 1-E -- Explore the potential for using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for Southside projects that would benefit the low and moderate neighborhoods along Pujol Street, as well as the community at-large. Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CITY OF TEr-IECULA UD/I Policy 1-F -- Consider the creation of a special district (e.g., landscaping and lighting district, special assessment district, etc.) to fund infrastructure, streetscape and other improvements that will enhance the area's attractiveness for conducting business and making investments in Southside. UD/I Objective 2 -- Promote compatible architectural styles to relate the Southside area to the surrounding neighborhoods with architectural styles, such as Monterey, Spanish Colonial, or Mediterranean along the northern portion of Front Street to serve as a natural transition into Old Town without replicating Old Town's Western theme. UD/I Policy 2-A -- Prepare design guidelines for the Southside area that can be used by new and existing development to achieve desired architectural styles. UD/I Policy 2-B -- Demonstrate facade rehabilitation possibilities for existing development to enhance compatibility between buildings throughout the Southside area. UD/I Objective 3 -- Build upon the unique attributes of the Southside area to create unique and quality development that enhances the overall image and economic vitality of the City and Old Town. UD/I Policy 3-A -- New and existing development should incorporate design features that conserve resources and minimize waste, including the following minimum considerations: Integrated pedestrian paths and plazas; Planting of drought tolerant trees and landscaping; c. Use of recycled materials; Solar orientation and shading for energy efficiency; and, Incorporation of natural drainage features. UD/I Policy 3-B -- Develop an urban design plan that optimizes linkages between the Southside area, Old Town, the Pujol Street neighborhoods, and the planned Westside Entertainment Center, all the while maintaining a unique theme that guides revitalization of the Southside area. UD/I Policy 3-C -- Through urban design and land use, provide for greater levels of vehicular and non- vehicular activity within the Southside area by: Ensuring Front Street's long- term use as a key entry into Old Town; Completing the sidewalk system; Developing a creekside multi- use recreational trail system; Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CTTY OF TEMECULA Southside Specific Plan Page 9 Enhancing pedestrian safety and comfort; and Improving aesthetics and wayfinding (i.e. signage, lighting, paving, etc.). UD/I Policy 3-D -- Design and construct physical gateway monuments where Front Street intersects with SR-79/VVestern Bypass and First Street/Santiago Road. UD/I Policy 3-E -- Identify a location for a focal point at the northern end of Front Street which serves as an identification marker for the Southside area. UD/I Policy 3-F -- Provide clear directional signage, adequate lighting, and a carefully designed business identification sign program to ensure orientation of motorists. UD/I Objective 4 -- To the extent possible, ensure that Southside conveys a positive image by promoting the proper maintenance of buildings and properties. UDfl Policy 4-A -- Identify incentives, such as sponsoring an annual "Best of Southside" competition, to encourage upkeep of buildings, landscaping and properties by merchants and property owners. UD/I Policy 4-B -- Prepare and distribute educational ~yers and pamphlets on property management to owners and managers in the Southside area. UD/I Policy 4-C -- In coordination with the Chamber of Commerce and other community groups, host property management and maintenance training and educational workshops for owners and managers in the Southside area. UD/I Policy 4-D -- Continue to aggressively enforce municipal codes for properties in the Southside area. Murrieta Creek- MC MC Goal -- To create technically sound and safe creek "improvements" which will reduce threat of fiooding in Old Town and Southside, as well as complement the visions for both areas. MC Objective 1 -- Provide improvements which will be aesthetically compatible with the vision for Southside. MC Policy 1-A -- Whenever possible, avoid vertical concrete channel walls. MC Policy 1-B -- Ensure that the "improved" creek contains living plant materials which are indigenous to a watershed area. MC Objective 2 -- Capitalize on the improvements to add desirable pedestrian/equestrian trails along the creek's edge or in the creek bottom. MC Policy 2-A -- Provide for equestrian trails within the Murrieta Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework CITY OF TEHECULA ........................................................................................................................... Creek corridor, including the location of a horse staging area. MC Policy 2-B -- Identify and provide opportunities via new development to link street-oriented sidewalk systems with future developed creek-oriented trails. MC Objective 3 -- Coordinate any plans for the creek with other City adopted plans. MC Policy 3-A -- Determine and outline the development process and mitigating measures necessary to develop adjacent to Murrieta Creek in order to facilitate new development and revitalization. MC Policy 3-B -- Initiate a dialog with the Riverside County Hood Control District to identify the limits of the flood plain. MC Policy 3-C -- Encourage the implementation of measures that delay or retain runoff onsite throughout the Valley to reduce flood flows in Murrieta Creek. MC Policy 3-D -- Discourage the continued narrowing of the floodway and channel for Murrieta Creek. area; it is not intended to specify actual projects that will be built in the area and does not bind either the City or private property owners to build any specific projects. However, the Vision communicates what "can be" in the Southside area and is built upon the public and professional input received throughout the Specific Plan process. The Vision also carries forward goals and policies established in the City of Temecula General Plan related to the Southside area. Section D · Imagine the Southside Area: An Urban Design Concept Figure 2-a, Urban Design Vision, is a graphic representation of a composite development direction for the Southside Chapter 2 Specific Plan Framework C I'Y OF TEM ECULA Southside Specific Pla,~ ....................................................... Page 1 Chapter 3 - Land Use and Development Standards Section A · Zntroduction Development Code. The purpose/intent of each district is as follows: This chapter establishes the proposed land use districts within the Southside Specific Plan area and the development standards that apply within each district. Together, the land use districts and the development standards provide the general development provisions for the Specific Plan area. The development standards, together with the design guidelines (Chapter 4) and infrastructure plan (Chapter 6) implement the goals of the Specific Plan. They are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and, in most cases, with the requirements of the Development Code. Where the development standards of the Specific Plan are different from the standards in the Development Code, the Development Code will be amended to implement the Specific Plan. Where direction is not provided in this Specific Plan, the provisions of the Development Code shall prevail. Highway-Oriented Commercial (HOC) District The Highway-Oriented Commercial District provides for three distinct user groups. The first group includes travelers and motorists who pass through the Southside area, but do not intend to make the City of Temecula a destination. Because of this District's immediate adjacency to Interstate 15 and State Route 79, traveler conveniences such as restaurants, over-night lodging, and gas stations will be permitted. The second user group will include visitors to the area who have identified the City of Temecula, including Old Town, as a destination point. Visitor-sen, ing uses such as extended-stay and resort lodging, restaurants, and non-intensive tourism attractions will be permitted. The third user group provides business and employment opportunities with uses permitting professional and office buildings. Section B · Land Use Districts The Southside Specific Plan area is comprised of seven (7) land use districts as indicated on Figure 3-a: Southside Land Use Districts. The land use districts do not necessarily coincide with the zones contained in the City of Temecula The district will be characterized by attractive and distinctive architectural design, innovative site planning, creek-side orientation, and notable landscaping amenities. Very strict design standards will govern the design and location of certain commercial uses in this district, such as gas stations and fast food restaurants. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards Southside Specific Plan CZTY OF TEMECULA Page 2 Service Commercial (SC) District The Service Commercial District provides opportunities for a range of commercial uses, and selected light manufacturing uses, such as limited automobile-related businesses, retail commercial, restaurants, and hardware stores. The district intends to allow for uses which serve local neighborhoods, the community and the sub-region. While this district covers a built-out portion of the Southside area, the regulations promote enhanced streetscape treatment, landscaping, improved signage and lighting, and access, circulation and surface parking of vehicles. Community Commercial (CC) District The Community Commercial District provides for lower intensity, creek-oriented uses that serve community and subregional needs with an emphasis on balancing convenient automobile access, incorporating efficient, safe, and attractive on-site pedestrian circulation, and facilitating linkages with nearby residential uses. The Community Commercial District provides for high-quality design of commercial areas that include, but are not limited to, themed single-story shopping and dining areas, smaller-scale, single-site activities -- such as small food markets, specialty retail, drug stores, cultural institutions, and barber shops/beauty salons -- and limited mixed-use (including residential) opportunities for combined artist studios and galleries as well as other live-work arrangements. Regulations in this district would promote pleasing commercial structures with human scale and pedestrian character, including efficient internal access, ingress and egress, and amenities such as plazas, courtyards, and attractive streetscapes. The regulations also promote development coordination between adjacent parcels with appropriate pedestrian amenities, integrated creekside design features, and facilities for access, circulation, and surface parking of vehicles. 4. Office (O) District The Office District provides for single- or multi-tenant offices and supporting uses, as well as community facilities, artist studios, and limited eating establishments. The district intends to provide for bungalow- styled buildings and low- and mid-rise buildings with unique architectural treatments, garden-type landscaping, and creek-side orientation. Design guidelines and development standards direct uses in this district to appropriately accommodate vehicular needs and encourage pedestrian activity through linkages to surrounding Uses. High Density Residential (HDR) District The High Density Residential District provides for attached residential development and compatible uses. Land uses permitted in the district include, but are not limited to, townhouses, apartments, non-profit clubs and meeting halls, and public and religious institutions. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards Public//nstitutional (P/Z) District The Public/Institutional District provides opportunities for important community services. Permitted in this district are public, private, and quasi-public uses such as community centers, cultural facilities, churches, recreational areas, parks, day care centers, low-intensity passive recreational activities, and limited agricultural uses (such as community gardens and farmers markets). Design guidelines and development standards reinforce the need for specialized design considerations in the district due to its proximate location between Murrieta Creek and residential uses. 7. Open Space (OS) District The Open Space District is provided to clearly designate those areas that may accommodate community facilities (such as nature centers and horse staging area) and creek-oriented trails. Permitted uses in this District are strictly limited. Creek bed uses are restricted to trails, and no buildings or other structures are permitted. Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Standards Southside Area conceptual Vision CITY OF TEMECULA OPEN SPACE "A Ftsion Shows Where We May Want To Go; A Plan Explains How We Get There." F ITEM #4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CiTY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager May 20, 1998 Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map) Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); ADOPT Resolution No, 98-__ recommending that the City Council approve an Resolution entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, Amending the City's General Plan Land Use Map for Properties Identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914- 811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 and 914-812-003 from VL (Very-low Density Residential .2-.4 Dwelling Units per Acre) to LM (Low-medium Density Residential 3-6 Dwelling Units per Acre) and Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140- 007 from M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 Dwelling Units per Acre) to HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial)" based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report; and ADOPT Resolution No. 98~__ recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance entitled: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, Amending Portions of the City's Development Code Pertaining to Landscape Requirements for Automobile Dealerships, Side Yard Requirements for Shopping Centers, Heights of Accessory Structures in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and Lm Zones, Regulations for Temporary Construction R:~STAFFRPTxI09pAgg.PCI ~/g/98 mf Trailers in Residential Zones, Clarifying Side Yard Storage for Vehicles, Motorcycle Parking Space Dimensions, Requirements for Wheel Stops in Commercial Zones, modifying Section 17.16.070 of the Development Code, deleting Pala Village from the list of Specific Plans, and amending the Zoning Map for Properties Identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001,914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001,914-812-002, 914-812-003 and 914-812-003 from VL (Very-low Density Residential .2-.4 Dwelling Units per Acre) to LM (Low-medium Density Residential 3-6 Dwelling Units per Acre) and Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140-007 from M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 Dwelling Units per Acre) to HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial), Assessor's Parcel Numbers 921-090- 038 and 921-090-039) from H (High Density Residential) to LM (Low-medium Density Residential 3-6 Dwelling Units per Acre), Assessor's Parcel Numbers 944-331-001 Through 944-331-025) from SP - Specific Plan (A Part of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan) to H (High Density Residential 13-20 Dwelling Units per Acre) and Re- assigning Numbers (SP-1 Through SP-8) to the Various Specific Plans Within the City" based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report BACKGROUND Staff has determined that there are items which need to be clarified in the City's General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. The recommendations below will rectify existing errors, and provide any needed clarification and/or adjustment resulting from the practical application of the General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. DISCUSSION Zoning Map Amendments and General Plan Amendments Staff has identified that several amendments need to made to the City's Zoning Map. These will necessitate modifications to the General Plan Land Use Plan prior to the approval of any changes to the City's Zoning Map. These are described in detail below: Calle Katerine This area (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001 through 914-811-007 and 914-812-001 through 914-812-004), which is located at the northern terminus of Calle Katerine is identified as Very Low Density Residential (VL) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.B). This area has been mistakenly designated as part of the Nicolas Valley special study area. The area is currently subdivided into standard subdivision sized residential lots. Staff recommends this portion be re-designated to Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) to be consistent with existing lot sizes. The General Plan Land Use Map identifies this area as VL (Very-Low Density Residential .2-.4 dwelling units/acre). Staff recommends the General Plan Land Use Plan be amended to LM (Low-Medium Density Residential 3-6 dwelling units/acre - reference Attachment No. 4.A). Salkind This area (Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140-007), which is located on the northwest side of Winchester Road at the City's limit is identified as Medium Density Residential (M) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.D). The property has frontage on Winchester Road and is not a part of the Winchester Creek development. This property was inadvertently split in half by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) when the City incorporated. The other half of the property, which is located within the unincorporated portion of Riverside County, is commercially zoned. Staff recommends that the zoning be re-designated to Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) to reflect the current land use of the rest of the parcel and because adequate buffering and separation distance from the existing residences. The General Plan Land Use Map identifies this area as M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 dwelling units/acre). Staff recommends the General Plan Land Use Plan be amended to HTC (Highway/Tourist Commercial - reference Attachment No. 4.C). Spanos Panhandle This area (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 921-O90-038 and 921-090-039), which is located on the east side of Margarita Road, south of North General Kearny, is currently designated High Density Residential (H) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.El. This property has been transferred to the owner to the north through a Lot Line Adjustment and has been included in Tentative Tract Map No. 28553. Staff recommends this portion be re-designated to Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) to be more consistent with the immediately adjacent property. Due to the scale of the General Plan Land Use Plan, no amendment is required. Rancho Highlands/Villa Hermosa This area (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 944-331-001 through 944-331-025), which is located on the west side of Ynez Road, immediately north of Tierra Vista Road, is identified as SP - Specific Plan (a part of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.F). This is conflict with that Specific Plan which identifies it as "Not A Part." Staff recommends this portion be removed from the SP designation and re-designated to High Density Residential (H) to be consistent with the existing land use. Due to the scale of the General Plan Land Use Plan, no amendment is required. Specific Plan Numbers Section 17.16.070 (Approved Specific Plans) of the Development Code assigns numbers (SP-1 through SP-9) to the various Specific Plans within the City. This modification to the Zoning Map will result in assigning these numbers to the Specific Plan areas on the Map (reference Attachment No. 4.G). No General Plan Amendment is required. Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Section 17. 16.070 - Approved Specific Plans Section 17.16.070 of the Development Code lists the specific plans which have been approved by the City and which are designated on the City's Zoning Map as a specific plan. SP-1 is listed in this Section as the Pala Village Specific Plan; however, the Cit¥'s Zoning Map does not reflect this. Staff conducted some research and determined that the County of Riverside had removed the specific plan designation prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. As a result, staff recommends that the Pala Village Specific Plan be deleted from Section 17.16.070 and the remaining Specific Plans be re-numbered accordingly. Landscape Requirements for Automobile Dealerships The City's Development Code encourages automobile dealerships to be located in the Service Commercial (SC) zone. The minimum landscaping requirement in this zone is twenty percent (20%). Staff is concerned that automobile dealerships have unique requirements when it come to landscaping their sites because they require large outdoor display areas. This large display area dictates a proportionally larger amount of landscaped area than a business that typically relies on interior display. It is staff's opinion that the critical areas which shall be landscaped for auto dealerships are: the perimeter (especially the streetscape and any buffering with adjacent uses), the end of drive lanes in display areas and adjacent to buildings which are accessed by the public. Staff recommends that Section 17.08.050.S. (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards) be added to the Development Code which would include the following language: Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new automobile dealerships: Display areas: a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape island shall be required at the end of all display area lanes. A two foot strip, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to the Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall have automatic irrigation. Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall have a minimum twenty foot (20') wide landscape buffer. Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential use shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer. All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide landscape buffer. R:'~STAFFRP~109PK98.PCI 5/11/98mf 4 The Community Development Director may increase the above mentioned minimum landscape buffering requirements if it is determined that it is necessary to mitigate impacts from the project. All employee and customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the Development Code. Buildings which are accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade. Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses. Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas they shall be screened in the manner discussed above. Yard Requirements for Shopping Centers Staff has determined that interior side yard requirements contained in Table 17.08.040.A (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Developments within Planned Shopping Centers or Industrial/Business Parks) and 17.08.040.B (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Development on a Separate Lot) for commercial developments should be modified. Many, if not most commercial developments cannot meet the 10 foot requirement due to current subdivision practices for commercial projects which often involves zero lot lines. Staff recommends that the interior side yard requirement be reduced to zero (0) for the NC, CC, HT and SC zones to allow maximum flexibility for existing and future developments for both Tables 17.08,040.A and 17.08.040.B. Heights of Accessory Structures Section 17.06.050.D of the Development Code allows a maximum height of sixteen feet for accessory structures in residential zones. This height restriction has recently been questioned by residents who wish to construct a barn as an accessory structure on a 2~ acre property. Upon further evaluation, the 16 foot height requirement does not seem reasonable for properties one acre in size or larger. As a result, staff recommends that Section 17.06.050.D.2 be amended to read as follows: "Height. Accessory structures shall not exceed the maximum height allowed for the zone, if located in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and L-2 zones" Adding Construction Trailers to Table 17.06.030 (Use Regulations - Residential) Trailers are often used in residential areas in conjunction with the construction of single-family and multi-family residences. They are not listed as a permitted use in Table 17.06.030. Staff recommends that they be a permitted use in all residential zones under the nonresidential heading. This would require that construction trailers receive an Administrative Development Plan from the Planning Department prior to their use. This would give the Planning Department better ability to condition the project (i.e., on-site mitigation, time limits, bonding, etc.). Vehicle Side-Yard Storage Footnote No. 3 of Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards - Residential Districts) reads as follows: In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular access to the rear of the property." Staff recommends that additional language be included at the end of this sentence which reads as follows: "...and shall be located on the same side as the driveway." It is staffs belief that this create a better streetscape, as opposed to two driveways on the same property frontage. Motorcycle Parking Space Dimensions Section 17.24.040.G. of the Development Code pertains to motorcycle parking requirements. While the Code calls out the requirements and credit for provisions of motorcycle parking spaces, the Code is silent as to the dimensions for the motorcycle parking spaces. Based upon research conducted on this matter, staff recommends that Section 17.24.040.G. be expanded to include subsection 3 and read as follows: "Motorcycle spaces shall be a minimum of seven (7) feet in length and three (3) feet four (4) inches in width." Wheel Stops Section 17.24.050 (Parking Facility Layout and Dimensions) provides standards for the design of off-street parking facilities. Staff has determined that there is a need to require wheel stops in certain instances. Staff recommends the Section 17.24.050.K. be added to the Development Code to read as follows: "Wheel Stops. Securely fixed wheel stops, at least six (6) inches in height shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a public right-of-way, a pedestrian walkway which would not meet handicapped accessibility requirements, and adjacent to walls, fences and buildings." ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code Amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. No mitigation measures are required. SUMMARY Staff has determined that there are items which need to be clarified in the City's General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. The amendments will rectify existing errors, and provide clarification to various components of the General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. Attachments: Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A. Resolution No. 98-__ - Blue Page 11 Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 15 Exhibit A. Ordinance No. 98- - Blue Page 19 Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 25 Exhibits - Blue Page 33 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:~STAFFRIr~109PA98.PC15/8/98 mf ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RF-~OLUTION ENTITLED: "A I~F-~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIFX) AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811.-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M C/VIElr)IUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7- 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL)" WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WJtFREAS, the Hanning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN RESOLUTION ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914- 812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MFX)IUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7-12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL)" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 20th day of May, 1998. Marcia Slaven, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~STAFFRP~109pAgli,PCI 5/8/98 mf ]0 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:~TAFFRP'I~109PAgS.PCI 5/8~93~ r~ ] ] EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIE_,S IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RF~gIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RF-gIDENTIAL 7- 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL) WIIEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S~ Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which lime the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments); and WI~.REAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on , at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; R:~TAFFR.FIXI09PA9S.PCI ~/S/~S mf THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. F_ix~ljag~. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65350 of the Government Code provides for the preparation, adoption and amendment of general plans and their elements; B. That there is a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Resolution complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. The General Plan Land Use Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Properties identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001,914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001,914-812- 002,914-812-003 and 914-812-003 shall be mended from VL (Very-Low Density Residential .2- .4 dwelling units per acre) to LM (Low-Medium Density Residential 3-6 dwelling units per acre). B. Property identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140-007 shall be amended from M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 dwelling units per acre) to HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial). Section 3. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~TAFFRPT~I09pAgg.PCI 5/8/98 mf 13 this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula __ day of , 199_. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of , 199_, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk R:~STAYFRFBI09PAgS.PCI 5/8/98raf 14 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 98- A'iTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_L'I/LA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQITIREaMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURF-~ IN THE HR, VL, L-l, L-2 AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, DF~I.ETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LI~T OF SPECI~C PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811- 004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001,914- 812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MF~DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7-12 DWElLLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921-4}90- 038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 9~A-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIHC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY ' R:x, STAFFP, FI~I09PAgS.PCI 5/8~98 mf 16 WItEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; Wt!EREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; WItEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code and the Zoning Map; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WttEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQIYIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-l, L-2 AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914.811-001,914-811-002, 914-811- 003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914- 812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (lV!F. IIIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7-12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921- 090-038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW- MEDIUM DENSITY IlF.~IDENTIAL 3--6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 94.~ 331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A. R:~TAFFRPTx109PA98.PCI 5/g/98 mf 17 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1998. Marcia Slaven, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~STAFFRPT~I09pA98.PCI ~/~/gS mf l 8 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 98- R:~STAFFRPT~I0~pAgg. PC I 5/g/gg mf EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CAI,P;ORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPlVIF~NT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTUI~F-q IN THE HR, VL, L-l, 1,-2 AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTWrED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811.003, 914-811.004, 914-811.00S, 914- 811-006, 914-811.007, 914-812.001, 914-812.002, 914-812.003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RF-~IDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RF~IDENTIAL 7- 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921-090-038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH ~a~/. 331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-I THROUGH SP-9) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY. WHFREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Han; WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; R:~STAFFRFFxI09pA98.PCI 5/8/98mf 20 WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code and the Zoning Map; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WIW~REAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WItEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heating, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on , at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Eixtdix~. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. Section 17.16.070 (Approved Specific Plans) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "SP-1 Roripaugh Estates SP-2 Rancho Highlands SP-3 Margarita Village SP-4 Paloma del Sol SP-5 Old Town R:~STAFFRF~I09PAgg.PCI 5/S/gSrn~ 21 SP-6 Campos Verdes SP-7 Temecula Regional Center SP-8 Westside Specific Plan" Section 2. Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards) is hereby added to the Development Cede and reads as follows: Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new automobile dealerships: a. Display areas: a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape island shall be required at the end of all display area lanes. A two foot strip, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to the Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall have automatic irrigation. Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall have a minimum twenty foot (20') wide landscape buffer. Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All portions of the proper~y which abut an existing or proposed residential use shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer. All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5 ') wide landscape buffer. The Community Development Director may increase the above mentioned minimum landscape buffering requirements if it is determined that it is necessary to mitigate impacts from the project. All employee and customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the Development Code. Buildings which are accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade. Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses. R:',STAFFP,.PT~I09PA98.PC15/8/98 m~ 22 Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas they shall be screened in the manner discussed above.. Section 3. Tables 17.08.040.A. (Development Standards Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Developments within Planned Shopping Centers or Industrial/Business Parks) and 17.08.040.B (Development Standards Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for a Development on a Separate Lot) of the Development Code are hereby amended to have a zero (0) foot interior side yard requirement for the NC, CC, HT, SC and PO land use designations. Section 4. Seelion 17.06.050.D.2 (Accessory Slructures and Uses) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Height. Accessory structures shall not exceed the maximum height allowed for the zone, if located in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and L-2 zones." Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Table - Residential Districts) of the Development Code is hereby amended include construction trailers as a permitted use in all residential zones, under the non-residential subsection of Table 17.06.030. Section 6. Footnote No. 3 of Table 17.06,040 (Development Standards - Residential Standards) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular access to the rear of the property and shall be located on the same side as the driveway." Section 7. Section 17.24.040.G.3 (Motorcycle Spaces) of the Development Code is hereby added to read as follows: "Motorcycle spaces shall be a minimum of seven (7) feet in length and three (3) feet four (4) inches in width." Section 8. Section 17.24.050.K (Parking Facility Layout and Dimensions) of the Development Code is hereby added to read as follows: "Wheel Stops. Securely fixed wheel stops, at least six (6) inches in height shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a public right-of-way, a pedestrian walkway which would not meet handicapped accessibility requirements, and adjacent to walls, fences and buildings." Section 9. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 10. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. R:~TAFFRPTx109pA98.PC15/8/98mf 23 Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED this __ day of Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __. day of , 199_, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk R:%STAF'FRPTXI09P,~gS.FCI 5/8,98 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:',STAFFRPT~I09PAgg. PCI ~/8~8mf 25 CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Project Title: Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Designation: Zoning: Description of Project: Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planrang Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400 City-wide Same as No. 2 Multiple designations Multiple designations Several clean-up amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use Plan and Zoning Map and amendments to the Development Code m modify landscape requirements for automobile dealerships, modify side yard requirements for shopping centers, clarify the heights of accessory structures in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and LM zones, adding regulations for temporary construction trailers in residential zones, clarifying side yard storage for vehicles, adding motorcycle parking space dimensions, and adding a requirement for wheel stops in commercial zones Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: N/A Other public agencies whose approval is required: None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: R:\STAFFR.PT~I09pAgg.pCi 5/I/9g mf 26 The environmental factors checked below would bc potentially affected by this project, revolving at least onc tmpact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as mdicatexl by the checklist on the following pages. ] Land Use and Plantung [ ] Hazards ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise ] Geologic Problcrns [ ] Public Services ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance [X] None DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, Signature Printed Name Date R:\STAFFRPTx, 109PAgg. PCI 5/8/98 mf 27 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? Conflict with applicable enviromental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d Affect agrieulturalreso~oroperatinns(e.g. impactsto soils or farmlands, or impacts 5'ore incompatible land uses)? e. Disruptordividethephysicalarrangementofanestablished commumty (including low-income or minorit~ community)? POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed offxcial regional or local population projects? b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infxastrueture)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving? Fault rupture? b. Seismic ground shaking? c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d. Seiehe, tsunarm, or volcanic hazard? e. Landslides or mudflows? f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grading or fill? g. Subsidence of the land? h. Expansive soils? I. Unique geologic or physical features? [] [] El [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [l [1 [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [xJ ix] ix] ix] [x] ix] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the R:~STAFFRF~I09pAgg.pCI 5/g/ggmf 2g rate and mount of surface ntnotf? b. Exposure ofpcople or propeny to water related hazards such as flooding? c. Discharge mto surface waters or other alteration ofsurface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d. Changes in the mount of surface water in any water body7 e. Changes in currents, or lhe course or dire~tinn of water f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, elLher through direct additions or withdrawals, or h~rough interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability7 g Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h. Impacts to groundwater quality? I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherv~se available for public water supplies? 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b. Expose sensitive receplors to polhitants? c. Alter air nlovenletlt, moisttire or temperatare, or cause any change in c|imate7 d. Create objectionable odors? 6, TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b. Hazards to safety ~om design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersectinn or incompatible uses)? c. inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d. Insu~icient parking capacity on-site or off-site7 e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [1 [] [] l] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] l] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [x] ix] I'x] [x'] Ix] Ix] ix] [x] [x] [x] ix] [x] [x] [x] [x] R:',STAFFP, FBI09PA98.PCI J/8/gg mf 29 pot~ttally Slgmficam Slgn~c~nt f. Conflicts with adopl~d policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus gouts, bicycle racks)? g. Rail, wat~rbome or air traffic impacts? 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, ammals and birds)7 b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)7 d Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripman and vernal pool)? e. Wildlife dispersal or migration coredors? g. ENERGY AND MlNERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b. Use non-renewal resources m a wasteful and inefficient manner? c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a. A risk ofaccidental explosion or release ofbaTardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticicles, chemical or radiation)? b. Possible interference wihh an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [x] [xl Ix] Ix] ix] Ix] [x] ix] fx] [x] [x] The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Exposure of people to exisfmg sources ofpotemial health hazards? incrces¢ fire hazard in areas with ~ammable brush, grass, Or trees? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 Ix] [x] [x] R:XSTAFFRF~I09pAgS.PCI 5/S/9g rd 30 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase m existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? Maintenanccofpublicfacilities, including roads? e. Other governmental services? 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d. Sewer or septic tanks7 e. Storm water drainage? f Solid waste disposal? g. Local or regional water supplies7 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Agcct a scenic vista or scenic highway? Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c. Create light or glare? 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? Po,~autlJy [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [1 [] Po~s~ttally [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [1 [1 [1 [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [1 [] [] [1 [] [1 [1 [1 [] [] [] [x] [x'] [x] [x'] [xq [xl [x] Ix] [x] ix] ix] [:x] ix] [x] ix) [x] [×] R:~TAFFRFI~109pAgg.pCI ~/8/9S mf 3 ] b. Disturb archaeological resources? c. Affect historical resources? d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e. Restrict existing religions or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FINDlNGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below seff-sostaimng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in ennnection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [x] [1 [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dweelly or mdireelly? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None. [] [] [] [~ DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMI}ACTS Based upon the analysis contained m the lmtial Environmental Study, the proposed Amendments m the City's General Plan Land Use Map, the Development Code and the Zoning Map will not have an impact to the environment in the following areas: Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geologic Problems, Water, Air Quality, Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources and Recreation. No mitigation measures will be required. R:\STAFFRPT~109PAg$.PCI 5/g/ggmf 32 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS R:\STAFFRPT~109pAgg. PCI 5/8/98 mf 33 CITY OF TEMECULA M 'LANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0170 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) EXamIT A CALLE KATERINE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT B CALLE KATERINE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SC M cc ~ BP L--~PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0170 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) £XHIBIT C SALKINDS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA ~P PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT D SALKINDS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA 'LANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT E SPANOS PANHANDLE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - CITY OF TEMECULA /+ SP PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT F RANCHO HIGHLANDS/VILLA HERMOSA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA L-PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXamIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS I PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SP 2 " SP PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA h It Im PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) ~:XIimIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXnmlT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SP-5 SP PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) ,~XHmIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) ExamiT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SP-8 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) ~XHmIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998