HomeMy WebLinkAbout072199 PC AgendaCALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE:
ROLL CALL:
PUBUC COMMENTS
In comFliNtce with the AiRemits with DicebiliUes Act, if you need spedal assistance to parUcl pate In ~ls meedng, pieace conrad the
ot~:e of the Community Devebpment Depatment at (909) 694-6400. Notification 48 hours pdor to a meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable srsngemsats to ensure ~',*-==~blllty to that meeting p.8 CFR 35.t02.35.104 ADA Title
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
July 21, 1999, 6:00 PM
43200 Business Park Ddve
Council Chambers
Temecula, CA 92590
ResoluUon Next In Order #99-019
Chairperson Guerriem
Fahey, Guerdem, Mathewson, Naggar, and Webster
A total of 15 minutes is provided so membem of the public can address the commissioners on items that are not listed on
the Agenda. Speakera are limited to throe (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissionera about an item
not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form shoutd be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you am called to speak, please come forward and state yourname and address.
For aJI other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be fled with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets
to that item. Them is a throe (3) minute time limit for indiVidual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Approval of Agenda
Approve June 16, 1999 Minutes
Dimctor's Hearing Update
Flow Cha~ts for Grading Permit, Building Permit and Final InspecUon Process
Dekkon PA98-0353 - Proposed Development Plan Changes
On The Boarder PA99-0079 - Proposed Murel
Home Depot Workshop
R:\wimbervg\plancomm~agendas\1999\7-21-99.do~
PUBUC HEARING ITEMS
8. Case No.:
Application:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Adion:
Case Planner.
Recommendation:
Planning ApplicaUon No, PA99-0236 (Site Plan Revision) and PA99-00t2
(CondiUonal Use Permit).
Fred Stephenson, Winston Tim
11440 West Bemardo CL, ~73, San Diego, CA 92127
The northwest comer of Winchester Road and Margadta Road, the Winchester
Meadows shopping sentor.
A request to change the sito plan configuration of the shopping centor to include the
abandon well site and enlarge two Iots for futum development. The application is a
proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot tier sales and installation,
automotive sen~ise and repair facility.
Exempt (Section Number 15332 In-fill Development Pmjeds)
Thomas Thomsley
Approval
PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting:
August4, 1999, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve,
Temeculs, California, 92590
R:\wimbetvg\phneomm~gcndafi1999%7-21-99 .doc
2
ITEM #2
CALL TO ORDER
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 16, 1999
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M.,
on Wednesday June 16, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Naggar.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent
Also Present:
Commissioners Fahey, Naggar, Webster, and Chairman
Guerriero.
None.
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Senior Engineer Alegria,
Attorney Curiey,
Senior Planner Fagan,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Associate Planner Donahce,
Assistant Planner Anders,
Project Planner Brown,
Project Planner Griffin, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This portion of the meeting was heard out of order, see page 3.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. ADDrOVal of AQenda
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
2. Apl~roval of Minutes-May 19. 1999
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the minutes, as written. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PlanComm/minutes/061699
3. Power Center Comer Monument
By way of overheads, Associate Planner Donahoe presented the staff report (of record),
highlighting the design and materials utilized for this particular project; indicated that
Exhibit A (referencing page 4 of the agenda material) had been updated; provided (via
supplemental material) the accurate revised design; and advised that due to the
Commission's previous recommendation, the applicant had removed the web address
from the design of the monument.
Mr. Bruce Manzer, representing Excall Architects, for Commissioner Naggar, relayed
that it was the applicant's desire to maintain the corporate logo in the design of the
monument; and noted that if it was the Commission's desire to condition the approval of
the project upon removal of the logo, that the applicant would most likely be agreeable.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to accept staff's recommendation to approve the
Comer Monument design at the Power Center. (This motion was withdrawn.)
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the comer monumentation,
conditioning the project to remove the corporate logo. Commissioner Webster seconded
the motion. (This motion was ultimately amended.)
Commissioner Fahey, echoed by Chairman Guerdere, relayed that due to the applicant's
substantial investment into the Power Center, the alenotation of the logo was
appropriate; and for Commissioner Naggar. advised that since the location of the logo
was designated by an architect, that the Commission not specify relocation of the logo.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the comer monumentation, as
designed. Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
4. Revision to Chemicon (PA99-0044}
By way of overheads and provision of a material color board, Assistant Planner Anders
provided the rationale for the revised design; relayed that staff was pleased with the
modifications; for Commissioner Naggar, noted that the previous COAs would not be
altered; and for Commissioner Webster, confirmed that the revised plan would include a
reduced truck loading area, which would be screened.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the proposed building modifications
regarding PA99-0145 (Development Plan). Commissioner Webster seconded the
motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
· Recluest to Aflendize the Home Depot Project per Brown Act provisions
Attorney Cudey advised that there is provision in the Brown Act for the addition of an
Agenda Item after posting of the meeting; relayed that the proposal would require a two-
thirds vote of the Commission, approving the need to take action and agreement that the
need arose subsequent to the Agenda's posting; relayed that the Home Depot proposal
2
PlanComm/minutes/061699
had been presented to the City; noted that the project is proceeding under the City's
fast-track program; relayed that the goal is to expedite the matter;, advised that the pre-
application submittal was received by staff on June 15, 1999, and that staff was,
therefore, unable to include the issue on the posted Agenda; presented the Commission
with the issue of taking action on whether on not it was their desire to add the Home
Depot matter to the Agenda; and relayed that if the Commission did not approve the
proposal to add the matter to the Agenda at this point in time, that the matter would be
agendized at a future Planning Commission meeting.
For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that staff error contributed
to the matter not being agendized.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to add the Home Depot matter to the Agenda.
Chairman Guerdero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected a split vote due to
Commissioners Naggar's and Webster's vote of n__o. (Denied, due to the lack of a two-
thirds vote. 2/2)
The Commissioner provided additional clarification regarding heir action.
In response to Planning Manager Ubnoske's recommendation, it was the consensus of
the Commission to reopen the Public Comment portion of the. meeting in order to allow
the applicant to provide a brief presentation to the CommissiorL
At this time the meeting continued back to the Public Cc,mments segment of the
meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Senior Planner Fagan provided a brief orientation of the proposed Home Depot Project;
and relayed that the proposal would be inclusive of a SpE;cific Plan amendment, a
Development Plan, and potentially a Development Agreement clarifying the rationale for
proposing the amendment to the Specific Ran.
Mr. Allan Davis, representing the applicant, relayed the raticnale for the project being
fast-tracked; and provided additional information regarding the location and conceptual
design of the proposed Home Depot site.
Mr. Rick Manners, representing the applicant, relayed the applicant's desire to develop
within the City of Temecula, rather than in the County (the s~Jrrounding unincerporated
area); and noted that the proposed plan would elaborate the design plan for this
particular Home Depot site.
At this time the meeting continued back to the regular order of the Agenda, and
Agenda Item 5 was considered.
5. Public Convenience or Necessity Criteria
Planning Manager Ubnoske invited the Commission to provide directive input with
respect to the City's current criteria utilized for a Finding of Public Convenience or
PlanComm/minuter,/061699
Necessity regarding alcoholic establishments; and relayed that if it was the
Commission's recommendation to revise the criteda currently utilized that she and the
City Attorney would furltier investigate the matter.
The Commission expressed their comments, as follows:
Commissioner Naggar recommended that staff further investigate the issue,
providing clarification as to the vadance between types of permitted alcoholic
establishments.
Commissioner Fahey recommended that the terms specialty store, Finding of
necessity, and sensitive areas be deady defined; and suggested that there be
provision of parameters with respect to heavily dense areas.
Chairman Guerdero recommended that criteda be developed to ensure that there is
not a proliferation of such uses in the City of Temecula.
Attorney Cudey advised that if the matter was further investigated by staff, that each
Commissioner would be provided copies of the applicable laws and State Guidelines;
and relayed that vadous types of alcoholic uses are recognized and licensed by the
ABC, due to the respective differences.
Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Court, recommended that a cdteria be developed
differentiating between restaurants, bars, and liquor stores; relayed that he would not
desire to have a proliferation of bars and liquor stores; and provided additional
comments regarding the vadant uses, and their effect on the community.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to recommend that staff further investigate
development of a revised Public Convenience of Necessity Cdteda. Chairman Guerdero
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. Planning Al~l~lication No. PA99-0145 (Develol~ment Plan)
Request to construct a 16,000 square foot industrial building on a 1.14 acre
parcel zoned for "Light Industrial" development.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
Senior Planner Fagan introduced Project Planner Gdffin to the Planning Commission;
and relayed that he was a welcome addition to the staff.
By way of color rendedngs and overheads, Project Planner Gdffin presented the staff
report (per agenda matedal). highlighting location, site plan, and landscaping; specified
PlanComm/minutes/061699
the screening of the loading area; and displayed the color board, noting the colors and
materials for this particular project.
Commissioner Naggar commended the architect for his diligent efforts with respect to
the reveals, sendblasting, and color application; and commended Project Planner Gdffin
for provision of a thorough staff report.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to dose the public headng; adopt Resolution No.
99-017 approving Planning Application No. PA99-0145 based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein; and adopt a Notice of Exemption for
Planning Application No. PA99-0145 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-017
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.PA99-0145,
A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF A 16, 111 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON 1.14
ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER
ROAD AND COLT COURT (42329 COLT COURT) AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-360-006.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
7. Plannine Application No. PA99-0082 (Development Plan)
Request to construct a 30,690 square foot industrial building with
associated parking and landscaping on a 3.14-acre parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
By way of color renderings, Project Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record),
highlighting access, parking, and architecture, noting the additional articulation; specified
the landscape plan, relaying that the project would exceed the requirements; and for
Commissioner Naggar, relayed that one of the businesses that would occupy a portion
of the project would be a furniture business. noting that it had not yet been determined
what the other uses would be.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; adopt Resolution
No. 99-018 apprcving Planning Application No. PA99-0082 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval; and adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0082 per
the Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332.
PlanComm/minutes/061699
RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.PA99-0082
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF A 30,690 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE,
WAREHOUSE AND MANUFACTURING BUILDING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 3.14 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN
TERMINUS OF MADISON AVENUE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 921-282-011.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster.
Commissioner Webster commended the architect for his efforts associated with the
extensive trim detail; and recommended that the Commission note the aforementioned
articulation for future referendng.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval.
At 7:03 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 7:08 P.M.
8, Subdivision Ordinance
Request to revise the Subdivision Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve a Resolution recommending that the city Council
adopt the Negative Declaration and approve the Ordinance.
Project Planner Brown presented the staff report; provided additional clarification
regarding the development standards with respect to maximum cul-de-sac length, the
number of access points for a subdivision, and lot size and arrangement; and relayed
the modifications requested by the Community Services District (via agenda material),
and the Public Works Department (via supplemental agenda material.)
Commissioner Fahey queded staff as to the urgency of approval of the matter in light of
the Commission's imminent appointment of a new Commissioner; and suggested
continuing the proposal until a full Commission could review the revisions.
For Commissioner Fahey, Project Planner Brown relayed that staff would be agreeable
to postponing the matter to the July 7, 1999 meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public headng; and to continue the
matter to the July 7, 1999, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PlanComm/minutes/0616911
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
For Commissioner Naggar, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed additional
information regarding the June 30, 1999 Workshop, regarding the Rodpaugh
Ranch Specific Plan.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that if the Commission had additional
questions regarding the Brown Act/Conflict of Interest Workshop that was held on
June 15, 1999, that they forward those questions to Attorney Cudey.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
In response to Commissioner Webster, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided
additional clarification regarding the County's current process of updating its
General Plan, and the associated concerns of the City of Temecula. Senior
Planner Hogan provided additional information regarding the County's proposed
project to construct new housing, and the potential impacts associated with the
proposal.
For Chairman Guerdero, Attorney Cudey provided additional clarification
regarding CEQA standards.
Planning Manager Ubnoske provided additional information regarding the Home
Depot matter.
For Commissioner Webster, Attorney Cudey clarified the process of inquiring of
staff regarding proposed projects, and associated questions; and confirmed that
the inquiring Commissioner should not relay whether they support a project, or
not, outside of the public hearing setting.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:30 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned this meeting to a Workshop
regarding: Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan on Wednesday. June 30, 1999 at 6:00 P.M.,
and the next regular meeting Wednesday. July 7, 1999, at 6:00 P.M., in the City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula.
Ron Guerdero, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
7
ITEM #3
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MI~MORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Harming Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
July 21, 1999
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for June 1999
Date Came 1~o.
June 24, 1999 PA99-0154
June 24, 1999 PA99-0195
The construction of ono and
two stoP] single family
homes with eight (8)
different models, v~rying in
siz~ from 1,1513 squ~re feet
to 2,427 squ~re feet, with
~ (9) different color
To construct "Legends"
subdivisions, consisting of
four floorplans with three
~l~vations each and nine
color schemes.
Applicant
Woodside Homes of
California
M-A Temeku Hills
Development, LLC
Action
Approvod
Approved
Attachments:
1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 3
R:'~DIRHEARXMEMO\I999\7-13-98.ME]MO.DOC
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ACTION AGENDAS
R:\DIRHEAR\MEMO\I999\7-13-98.memo.doc
2
ACT1ONAGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 24, 1999 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER: Matthew Fagan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item no__t listed on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Recommendation:
Planning Application No. PA99-0154 (Development Plan for
Product Review)
Woodside Homes of California, Inc.
In the Campos Verdes Specific Plan located at the southeast
comer of Margarita and Winchester Roads, north of North
General Keamy
Road.
The construction of one and two story single family homes
with eight (8) different models, varying in size from 1513
square feet to 2427 square feet, with nine (9) different color
schemes.
This project is exempt from environmental review pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, Categorical Exemption,
Class 5 - Minor Alteration in Land Use Limitations.
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
Approval
ACTION:
APPROVED
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Planning Application No. PA99-0195 (Product Review)
M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC
The Temeku Hills portion of Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Recommendation:
Village), located north of Rancho California Road, east of
Margarita Road, south ofLa Serena Way and west of Meadows
Parkway
To construct the "Legends" subdivisions, consisting of four
floorplans with three elevations each and nine color schemes
Categorical Exemption
Carole K. Donahoe, AICP
Approval
ACTION:
APPROVED
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM #4
CITY OF TEMCULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commissioners
u ZO c-'
Debbie bnoske, Planning Manager
July 21, 1999
Flow Charts for Grading Permit, Building Permit and Final Inspection
Processes
Recommendation: Receive and Review the Flow Charts for Grading Permit,
Building Permit and Final Inspection Processes
Background
Several months ago several Planning Commissioners stated that they would like to
know what happens to projects once they receive Commission approval. Planning
staff stated that they were in the process of creating flow charts for distribution to the
public that described the steps required for permit issuance after Commission approval.
Staff stated we would bring these back before the Commission as soon as they were
available. Planning Staff worked with Public Works, Building and Safety and Fire
Department staff to develop these flow charts. They were generated for a "typical"
new commercial or industrial project and center on the three critical development
milestones listed below:
· Grading Permit Process
· Building Permit Process
· Final Inspection Process
Staff will make a brief presentation to the Commission at hearing.
Attachments:
Grading Permit Process - Blue Page 2
Building Permit Process - Blue Page 3
Final Inspection Process - Blue Page 4
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~owchan pcl .doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
GRADING PERMIT PROCESS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNINGXSTAFFR?T~owchar~pcl-doc
2
A
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS
\\TEM EC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTSXPLANNINGXSTAFFRPTX~owchart pc I .doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
FINAL INSPECTION PROCESS
\\TEM EC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNINGXSTA FFRPTx~owchart pc 1 .doc
4
ITEM #5
MEI~IORANDUlVI
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Harming Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manage~t~",-
July 21, 1999
Proposed Changes for Planning Application PA 99-0353 (Dekkon), located on
Winchester Road, northeast of Bostik Court within the Westside Business Center
Prepared By: Patty Anders ~. h-'
The Planning Commission approved PA 99-0353 (Development Plan) on October 21, 1998. The
Development Plan application approved the design, construction and operation of a 23,098 square
foot office/industrial/warehouse building. Subsequent to that approval, the developer is proposing
significant changes to the overall site design to a 17,598 square foot office/industrial/warehouse
building. The changes are significant; therefore, a finding of substantial conformance can not be
made. The applicant would like to bring the proposed changes before the Commission as a
preliminary/informational review for your initial feedback. SUaff will present the previously
approved project and the proposed project at the meeting. The applicant will be present to address
the Commission.
The project, as fried as a new application, expected to be brought back to the Commission as a
legal, public hearing item on the August 4, 1999 meeting.
ITEM #6
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commissioners
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager'~'//C/-
July 21, 1999
SUBJECT:
Follow-up information regarding the permissibility of a western theme mural
proposed on the street side elevation of the proposed On The Border
Restaurant, Planning Application No. PA99-0079 (Development Plan), on out-
lot "K" at the Promenade Mall on the corner of Winchester Road and Ynez
Road.
PREPARED BY:
Thomas ThornsIcy, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend that the Planning Commission concur with staff in
approving the use of the mural on the restaurant.
BACKGROUND:
This item was brought to the Planning Commission on July 7, 1999,
at which time several concerns were voiced about the pennissibility
of murals on a business. Staff is researching this issue thoroughly
and will make an oral presentation to the Planning Commission on
July 21, 1999.
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFILPT\79PA99 PC MEMO.doc
ITEM #7
CITY OF TEMCULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
July 21, 1999
Planning Commission Workshop for the Home Depot, proposed for the
north side of State Highway 79 South, between Margarita Road and
Meadows Parkway, within the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. #219
On July 14, 1999, Grant General Contractors submitted a formal application for the
above-referenced project. Staff has committed to review the application subsequent
to the Pre-Application Meeting held with the development team for the project on June
30, 1999. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting has already been
scheduled for July 22, 1999.
However, because of the aggressive schedule requested by the applicant, staff has
agendized a workshop with the Planning Commission to review the proposal. The
following exhibits are attached for your consideration:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Home
Home
Home
Home
Home
Depot Site Plan
Depot Landscape Plan
Depot Floor Plan
Depot Elevation Plan
Depot Grading Plan
Home Depot Statement of Operations
Color and Material Display
Center Site Plan
Retail Villages Site Plan
Retail Villages Conceptual Elevation
Two Village Vignettes
After a brief summary of the project and issues involved, the applicant will make his
presentation to the Commission.
R:\PREAPP\hOrne depot wkshop srpt.doc
ITEM #8
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 21, 1999
PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision) and
Planning Application PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
Prepared By:
Thomas K. Thornsley, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Ran, Revision)
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit) based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No,
PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision) and PA99-0012
(Conditional Use Permit) pursuant to Section 15332 of the
CEQA Guidelines.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Fred Stephenson
PROPOSAL:
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 is a request to
reconfigure a portion of the Winchester Meadows
Shopping Center by incorporating the abandoned
well site and relocating and enlarging two
undeveloped pad sites.
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 is a proposal to
build and operate a 5,310 square foot tire store with
sales and installation, automotive service and repair
facility.
LOCATION:
Located on the northeast corner of Margarita Road and
Winchester Road (Winchester Meadows Shopping Center),
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Site CC (Community Commercial)
EXISTING ZONING:
Site CC (Community Commercial)
R:\STAFFRPTH 2pa99.doc 1
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: PI (Public Institutional)
South: CC (Community Commercial)
East: SP-1 (Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan)
West: CC (Community Commercial)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Shopping Center
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Chaparral High School
South: McDonald's/Costco
East: Lewe's Hardware (under construction)
West: Ralph's
PROJECT STATISTICS
Winchester Meadows Shoppine Center
Total Area Gross: 666,468 square feet
Oriqinally Revised
15.3 acres 15.5 acres
Winston Tire Store
Total Project Area Net: 30,430 square feet .7 acre
Total Building Area 5,310 square feet 17 %
Landscape Area: 11,089 square feet 37 %
Paved Area: 13,056 square feet 43 %
Hardscape: 975 square feet 3 %
Parking Required:
4 parking spaces per service bay
24 spaces
Parking Provided:
25 spaces
Building Height: 24 feet
BACKGROUND
The Winchester Meadows Shopping Center with Ralph's Groceries was approved by the Planning
Commission under Planning Application No. PA97-0305. At that time there was a well site on the
corner of the site at Winchester and Margarita Roads. The well site was abandoned by Rancho
California Water District and was acquired by the center developer. With the addition of this
property the developer has requested to incorporate this area into the overall site.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision) and PA99-0012 (Conditional
Use Permit), are located in the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center on the northeast corner of
Winchester and Margarita Roads. The revisions to the original site plan (Planning Application No.
PA97-0305) allows the developer enlarge the shopping center by .2 acres by including the abandon
well site and recenfiguring the size and location of Pads 'B' and Pad 'C' (See Exhibits D & E). Both
pads will now front onto Winchester Road providing greater exposure to the future tenants, allowing
for larger tenant spaces, and a providing a better site layout for traffic flow.
Concurrently with the site plan revisions, Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use
Permit) is a proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot Winston Tire Store for tire sales and
installation, with additional automotive service and repair on Pad 'B'. This pad is .7 acres and is
located at the corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads (See Site Plan Exhibits F).
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 2
ANALYSIS
Site Desictn and Circulation
The layout of the two pad sites, Pads 'B' and 'C' fronts both onto Winchester Road and provides
associated parking with full circulation movements around all parking spaces. The main driving
aisle running parallel to Winchester Road provides access to both sites from the driveway entries
off of Winchester and Margarita Roads. Neither pad will have direct access to the abutting roads.
Pad 'B' is designed to accommodate a Winston Tire store with the building backing up to Margarita
Road so that the sen/ice bays are oriented to face into the property to limit their view for the public
right-of-way. A screen wall and a landscaping berm will be installed to provide screening of the
sen/ice bays from the public right-of-way, as required by the Design Guidelines (See Exhibits G).
The office and customer entrance to the store face Winchester Road. Vehicle access to the store
in provided by a looped drive aisle that will circulate past three rows of parking located in front of
the service bays
Pad 'C' is tentatively designed to accommodate a drive-thru restaurant and appears to have proper
circulation to and through the site. A full review of this site will be assessed when an application
is presented to the Planning Department.
Parkinq Analysis
With the inclusion of the well site property the overall site is enlarged with larger buildings and more
parking. The Winston Tire store needs to provide 24 parking spaces and has provided 25 parking
spaces. If Pad 'C' remains a proposed drive-thru restaurant, as shown, it would require 28 parking
space and has provide 32 parking spaces. The changes to these two pad sites the remainder of
the shopping center is unchanged.
Architecture & Colors
The building for Winston Tire is a rectangular building measuring 118 feet by 45. On the right two
thirds of the building, facing the parking lot, will be six sen/ice bays with roll-up doors and the sales
with the customer entrance on the left (See Exhibits H). From Winchester Road the public will see
into the sales area with its glass front and stucco columns supporting the arched parapet wall rising
to maximum height of 24 feet above over the ground. Along Margarita Road the building will repeat
the Winchester Road elevation flanked with stucco finished walls capped with a cornice. The colors
of the stucco walls will be off whites and sandstone beiges with accenting colors in shades of
green. The building is consistent with the architecture and colors of the shopping center.
Landscapinq
Thirty-seven percent (37%) of the Winston site has been landscaped which far exceeds the twenty
percent minimum landscaping requirement in the CC (Community Commercial) zone. This site
fronts two streets, which require twenty-five to thirty feet of landscaping. Along Margarita Road will
be California Pepper and Purple Leaf Plum trees and along Winchester will be African Sumac. At
the base of the building will be a mix of scrubs and flowering plants surrounded by ground cover
(star Jasmine), and turf. Landscaping and a seating court are provided at the front of the building
as part of an outside waiting area for customer. A six foot tall with three feet of mounding and
dense landscaping will be installed along Winchester Road to screen the view into the service bays
(See Exhibits I).
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.Ooc 3
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
These projects are categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) and a Notice of Exemption has been
prepared for Planning Applications No. PA99-0012 and PA99-0236.
Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that: are less than five (5) acres and
substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services.
The affected area of the site expansion and development meets all of the criteria noted above, and
therefore the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the
CEQA Guidelines.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project is consistent with the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation and the
Community Commercial (CC) zoning applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan and
Development Code. Upon approval of the Development Plan Revision and the Conditional Use
Permit as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and standards for commercial
development prescribed by the Development Code and Design Guidelines.
SUMMARWCONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development,
and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and
employment base.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposal, a commercial automotive service business, is consistent with the land use
designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards
in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Community
Commercial (CC) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and
density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent
with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions,
and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
R:%STAFFRPT%12pa99.doc 4
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are
no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore,
grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The
project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The proposal, a conditional use permit for a commercial automotive service business, is
consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community
Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for Community Commercial (CC) development contained in the
City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to
be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The
project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide
Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and development
of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site
improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with,
all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures.
The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved development plan.
The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the building while
meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to
integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as
conditioned, will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the
community
The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time of
their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a
Public Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on
this matter before the Commission renders their decision.
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.doc 5
Attachments:
1.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
PC Resolution - Blue Page 13
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 17
Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 28
Exhibits - Blue Page 31
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Vicinity Map
Zoning Map
General Plan
Original Site Plan (PA97-0305)
Revised Site Plan (PA99-0236)
Winston Tire Site Plan
Line of Sight Study
Elevation
Landscape Plan
Floor Plans
R:%STAFFRPT~I 2pa99.doc 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99,doc 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0236 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION PROPOSAL TO
RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE WINCHESTER MEADOWS
SHOPPING CENTER BY INCORPORATING AN ABANDON WELL
SITE AND RELOCATING AND ENLARGING TWO
UNDEVELOPED PAD SITES ON .7 OF AN ACRE; LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO.
911-170-098 AND PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 28934
WHEREAS, Fred Stephenson, Winston Tires, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0236,
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0236 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0236 on
July 21, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0236;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a commercial automotive service business, is consistent with the land
use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in
the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Community
Commercial (CC) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of
commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mr. Palomar Lighting
Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has
R:\STAFFRPT~I 2pa99.doc 8
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
are no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This
Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The
subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0236 a Development Plan Revision which
proposes to reconfigure a portion of the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center by incorporating
an abandon well site and relocating and enlarging two undeveloped pad sites on a .7 of an acre,
located at the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Winchester Road, known as Assessor's
Parcels No. 911-170-098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934, and subject to the project specific
conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of July,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99,doc
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.dOc 10
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
Project Description:
A request to reconfigure a portion of the Winchester
Meadows Shopping Center by incorporating an abandon
well site and relocating and enlarging two undeveloped
pad sites located on the northwest corner of Winchester
Road and Margarita Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Retail Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.;
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934
July 21, 1999
July 21, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.~oc 11
The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for PA97-0305
(Development Plan) and PA97-0368 (Tentative Parcel Map TPM 28697) which previously
applied and/or unless superseded or amended by these conditions of approval.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially to Exhibit E (Site Plan-
Revised), approved with Planning Application No. 99-0236, or as amended by these
conditions.
Pedestrian access shall be provide to all buildings and facilities that complies with
applicable disabled access regulations including the California Disabled Access
Regulations.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
7. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
8. The approved Grading Plan shall be revised to incorporate the changes and shall be
prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the
Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control
measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
9. The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded document, which reflects that the Rancho
California Water District well site has been abandoned to the Department of Public Works.
10. The Developer shall extend the existing ingress/egress easement from Parcel 4 of Parcel
Map No. 28939 to this project site.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\STAFFRPTH2pa99.dOc 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0012 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT OF A 5,310 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL
BUILDING ON .7 OF AN ACRE AND A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT THE OPERATION OF AN AUTOMOTIVE TIRE AND
SERVICE STORE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
MARGARITA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO. 911-170-098 AND PARCEL 4 OF
PARCEL MAP 28934
WHEREAS, Fred Stephenson, Winston Tires, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0012,
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0012 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99~0236 on
July 21, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Applications No. PA99-0012;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Conditional Use Permit Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a conditional use permit for a commercial automotive service
business, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community
Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for Community Commercial (CC) development contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically
suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned
is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions and
fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses. including the site, building. parking. circulation and other associated
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.dOC 14
site improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all
applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development
will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
C. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved
development plan. The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate
the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as conditioned,
will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community
E. The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time
of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public
Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on this matter
before the Commission renders their decision.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 and PA99-0012 were made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15332. This Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain
prescribed criteria. The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can
be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0012 for a Development Plan for the design,
construct of a 5,310 square foot commercial building on .7 of an acre and a Conditional Use Permit
the operation of an automotive tire and service store, located at the northwest corner of Margarita
Road and Winchester Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-170-098 and Parcel 4 of
Parcel Map 28934, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A (Development
Plan), and Exhibit B (Conditional Use Permit), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 15
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of July,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
b
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPTH 2pa99.doc 16
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
R:%STAFFRPT\12pa99.dOC 17
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Development Plan - Winston Tire Store)
Project Description:
A proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot tire
store for tire sales and installation with additional
automotive service and repair located on the northwest
corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Service Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934
July 21, 1999
July 21, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
R:\STAFFRPTH 2pa99.doc 18
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0012, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for PA97-0305
(Development Plan), PA97-0368 (Tentative Parcel Map TPM 28697) and PA99-0236
(Development Plan, Revision) which previously applied and/or unless superseded or
amended by these conditions of approval.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially to Exhibit F (Site Plan),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
The development of the building shall conform substantially to Exhibit H (Elevations),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
The installation of the landscaping and screen wall along Winchester shall be in substantial
conformance with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits F & I) for the purpose of screening
the view of the service bays from the public right-of-way. Prior to the release for occupancy
staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verify that they provide the
intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager shall have
the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the intent of
the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be
the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
Landscaping shall conform substantially with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan
(Exhibit I), and the criteria set forth in the General Plan, or as amended by these conditions.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of
the Planning Manager and the Development Code. If it is determined that the landscaping
is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the
property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape
plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
10.
The colors and materials used for this industrial building shall conform substantially to the
appreved color and material board, or as amended by these conditions.
Material Color
Exterior Plaster wall and columns
Base Accent Band
Cornice and Accent
Secondary Field
Canvas Awnings
Tile and Metal Roof
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.doc
Frazee #CW055X "Honeywind" (white)
Frazee #8733M "Walnut Wash" (beige)
Frazee #8243M "Amber Waves" (tan)
Frazee #8733M "Walnut Wash" (beige)
Frazee #7764M "Coffee 'N Cream" (tan)
Frazee #7794M "Appealing Apricot" (apricot)
Sunbrella #4623 "Aquamarine" (aquamarine)
AEP. Span "Hemlock Green (olive green)
Summetville 552 "Verdigris" (aqua green)
19
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints each of the Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural Elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shah
be readable on the photographic prints.
12.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
13.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14.
All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were
designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building.
15. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
16.
Three (3) copies of detailed Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance and conform substantially to the approved Conceptual
Landscape Plan (Exhibit I) or as amended by these conditions. The cover page shall
identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One ( 1 ) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
17.
Separate building permit applications for the installation of signage shall be submitted in
conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code.
18.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
19.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the planrings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plans, shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
R:\STAFFRPTH 2pa99.doc
20
20.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground.
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
21.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1996 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
22.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
23.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
24.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
25. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be S-3/B.
26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
27.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
28. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
29 Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
30. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
31. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
R:\STAFFRPT~I 2pa99.doc 21
32. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
33. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
34. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
35. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
36. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
37. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
38. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
39. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
40. Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall
complete all conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan
all existing and proposed property lines. easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
41. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
42. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
43. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-
way.
44. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
45. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property
R:\STAFFRPT~I 2pa99.doc 22
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide any upgrading or
upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements
necessary to make required improvements.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 23
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
55
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
56.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
57.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
58.
The Developer shall extend the existing ingress/egress easement from Parcel 4 of Parcel
Map No. 28939 to this project site.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
59.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
60.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
61.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
62.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
R:%STAFFRPT\12pa99.doc 24
63.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may
be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type,
or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The
Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC
903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
64.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
65,
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess
of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required.
For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
66.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
67.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
68.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility
or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall
be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness
of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902)
69.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen
(13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
70.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
71.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall
be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
R:\STAFFRPTH 2pa99.cjoc 25
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
72.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
73.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building.
The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)
inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses
shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
74.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
75.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an
fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central
station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10)
76.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and
be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be
supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4)
OTHER AGENCIES
77.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal January 27, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
78.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water Districts transmittal January 25, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
79.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Riverside Transit Agency
transmittal January 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
80.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in CALTRANS transmittal
January 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 26
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 27
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99,doc 28
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit - Winston Tire Store)
Project Description:
A proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot tire
store for tire sales and installation with additional
automotive service and repair located on the northwest
corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Service Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934
July 21, 1999
July 21, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors. legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof. advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions appreved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
,
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0012. unless superseded by these conditions of appreval. AIr these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 29
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
The installation of the landscaping and screen wall along Winchester shall be in substantial
conformance with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits F & I) for the purpose of screening
the view of the service bays from the public right-of-way. Prior to the release for occupancy
staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verify that they provide the
intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager shall have
the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the intent of
the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be
the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
At the end of the first year of occupancy, and prior to the release of the Landscape Security
Bond, the landscaping will be inspected for conformance with the screening requirement.
Should replacement landscaping be needed the owner will be required to make these
improvements.
The use of window signs will be limited to those permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance No.
98-10 and in no case shall more than 20% of the window areas be used for signage.
OTHER AGENCIES
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated June 17, 1998, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 30
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRP"~12pa99.dOc 31
CITY OF TEMECULA
SAN DIEGO
|A
ROAD
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
PLANNING APPLICATION N0. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99doc 32
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
;'/SP
ZONING MAP
~P
CC
SC SC
GENERALPLAN
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -July 21, 1999
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.dOC 33
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINCHESTER MEADOWS SITE PLAN
(AS APPROVED 12/15/97, PA 97-0305)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
ORIGINAL SITE PLAN
(PA97-0305)
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99dOc 34
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVISED WINCHESTER MEADOWS SITE PLAN
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
REVISED SITE PLAN
(PA99-0236)
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99+doc 35
WINCHESTER ROAD
o/
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
WINSTON TIRE SITE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99,doc 36
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINSTON TIRE STORE
LINE OF SIGHT STUDY - I, OOKING NORTHWEST FROM WINCHESTER AVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO, PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
LINE OF SIGHT STUDY
R:\STAFFRPT~12pa99,doc 37
CITY OF TEMECULA
SOUTH
NORTH
WEST
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- July 21, 1999
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99,doc 38
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINSTON
TIR[ STOR~
FUTURE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE o July 21, 1999
LANDSCAPEPLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pagg.doc 39
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT J
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- July 21, 1999
FLOOR PLANS
R \STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 40
In compliance with the Antedcans with DisabllNes Act, If you need speclet assistance to padiclpato in this meeting, please contact ~e
office of the Communily Development Department at (909) 694-6400. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will e~able the CIty to make
reaso~ble arrangements to ensue accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
July 21, 1999, 6:00 PM
43200 Business Park Drive
Council Chambers
Temecula, CA 92590
ResoluUon NextIn Order#99-021
CALL TO ORDER:
Chaiiperson Guerriem
FLAG SALUTE:
ROLL CALL:
Fahey, Guerriere, Mathewson, Naggar, and Webster
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissionere on items that are not listed on
the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item
no__t listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are cafied to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be f'ded with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets
to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
'1. Approval of Agende
ACTION:
APPROVED 4-1, FAHEY ABSENT
Approve June t6, t999 Minutes
ACTION: APPROVED 3-2, MATHEWSON ABSTAINED, FAHEY ABSENT
Director's Headng Update
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE
Flow Charts for Grading Permit, Building Permit and Final Inspectjon Process
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE
Dekkon PA98-0353 - Proposed Development Plan Changea
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE (Going to Public Hearing on August 4)
On The Boarder PA99-0079 - Proposed Mural
ACTION: DENY 3-2, NAGGAR/MATHEWSON/GUERRIERO OPPOSED
Home Depot Workshop
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE
R:\WIMBERVG\PLANCOMM\AGENDAS\1999\7-21-99.doc
PUBUC HEARING ITEMS
Case No.:
Application:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner.
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Site Plan Revision) and PA99-0012
(Conditional Use Permit).
Fred Stephenson, Winston Tire
11440 West Bemardo Ct., #273, San Diego, CA 92127
The nodhwest comer of Winchester Road and Margadta Road, the Winchester
Meadows shopping canter.
A request to change the site plan configuration of the shopping center to include the
abandon well site and enlarge two lots for future developmenL The application is a
proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot tier sales and installation,
automotive sewice and repair facility.
Exempt (Section Number 15332 In-fill Development Projects)
Thomas Thomsiey
Approval
DENY 5-0
PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting:
August4, 1999, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve,
Temecula, California, 92590
R:\WIMBERVG\PLANCOMM\AGENDAS\I999X7-21-99 .doc
2