HomeMy WebLinkAbout080499 PC AgendaIn compliance with die Am with DisabillUes Act, if you need special asdstance to participate in this meeUng, please contact the
office of the Comnvjnity Development Depadment at (969) 894-6400. Notilcntlon 48 hours prior to · meeting will enab4e the City to
reasonable amangemento to ensue accesslbilRy to that meedng [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Tlee |Q
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE:
ROLL CALL:
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
Aurluat 4, t999, 6:00 PM
43200 Business Park Drive
Council Chambers
Temecula, CA 92590
Chairperson Guerriero
Resolution Next In Order #99-022
Fahey, Guerriem, Mathew.son, Naggar, and Webster
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of tie public can address the commissioners on items tiat are not listed on
tie Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item
not listed on tie Agenda, a pink "Requeat to Speak" form should be filled out and flied with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all otier agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be iliad with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets
to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Approval of Agenda
Minutes from June 30, 1999
Minutes from July 7, 1999
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Case No:
Applicant:
Locatbn:
Pmpesal:
Environmental Action:
Planner.
Recommendation:
PA 98-0353 (Revisions lo Previously Approved Development Plan)
James Hunalley, Dekkon Development.
Winchester Road nodheast of Bostik Coud within the Westside Business Center.
The design, construction and operation of a 17,598 square foot office/industrial
building (previously approved at 23,098 square feet).
Consistent with previoudy appmved Mitigated Negative Dedaratio
Patty Andera, Assistant Planner
Approval
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Pmpesah
Environmental Action:
Planner.
Recommendation:
Planning ApplicaUon No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
Sherry C. Evens
43047 Camino Casitlas, south of Pauba Road, west of Via Rami
To operate a Large Family Daycare Home for up to t4 children, M-F, 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Exempt
Carole Donahoe, AICP
Approval
5. Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner.
Recommendation:
6. Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner.
Case Engineer.
Recommendation:
7. Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Plannen
Case Engineer.
Recommendation:
8. Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner.
Recommendation:
PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting:
Planning Application No. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit).
Brian Pdce, Breckenridge Group
30252 Tomas, Ste. 200, Rancho Santa Margadta, CA 92688
The south side of Winchester Road midway between Ynez Road and Margarita Road,
at the Promenade Mall (Pad A).
Planning App4icatjon No. PA99-0077 is a request to buid and operate a 3,800 square
foot drive-thru restaurant (Burger King).
Exempt (Section Number 15332 In-fill Development Projects)
Thomas Thomsley
Approval
Planning Application No. PA99-0168 (Development Plan)
Sullivan Bay Company
27525 Enterprise Circle South (directly adjacent and south of Farmer Boy's)
The design, constructton and oporatbn of two 6,000 square foot commercial
speculative buildings on a 0.99 acre parcel.
Exempt
John De Gange
Annie Bostre-Le
Approval
Planning Application No. PA99-01t5 (Development Plan)
Don Mosco
The west side of Colt Court, approximately 200 feet south of Winchester Road
The design, construdion and operation of a 13,400 square foot industrial building on
a 0.97 acre parcel.
Exempt
John De Gange
Clement Jimenez
Approval
Planning Application No. PA99-01 '16 (Development Plan)
Don Mosco
Lot 2 of Parcel Map 28471-1 (east side of Colt Court, south of Winchester Road)
Construct a 22,000± sq. ft. industrial building on a 1.28 acre parcel zoned for 'Light
Industrial' development
Exempt
Steve Griffin
Approval
August 18, 1999, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California, 92590
R:\~qI~IBERVG\PLANCOIdlv[\AGENDAS~I999\B"4-99.doc
2
ITEM #2
MINUTES FROM JUNE 30, 1999
MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
JUNE 30, 1999
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a workshop at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday June 30, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Naggar.
ROLLCALL
Present:
Commissioners Fahey, Naggar, and Chairman Guerriero.
Absent:
Commissioner Webster.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Associate Planner Donahoe,
Project Planner DeGange,
Project Planner Thomsley, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
XX:X
At this time, City Clerk Jones duly swore
in the newly appointed Planning Commissioner,
David Mathewson.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Aqenda
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected approval with the exception
of Commissioner Webster who was absent.
2. RoriDauQh Ranch Specific Plan Workshop {information item only)
Providing a brief overview, Project Planner DeGange presented the staff report (of
record), highlighting the associated annexation proposal; and introduced Mr. Andrew
Daymude, representing the applicant.
Mr. Daymude introduced the engineers, developers, and planners present of the
consulting team, representing the project, who were available for questions and
comments.
PlanComm/minutes1063099
Mr. Daymude presented a detailed overview of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, relaying
the following:
On June 1, 1999 the project began the 45-day California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) process, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) addressing potential
environmental impacts associated with this particular project.
Noted the projecrs process of planning from 1994 to the present.
Presented the local activities, residential and commercial development, and growth
in the adjacent areas to the proposed project.
Specified the location of the Ultimate Butterfield Stage Road Extension and the
location of the Roripaugh Ranch site.
Noted that the proposed project currently encompasses two jurisdictions (the
County of Riverside and the City of Temecula), relaying the plan to annex the entire
portion to the City of Temecula in order to maintain one jurisdiction for the
permitting and processing process.
Provided a brief history of the Roripaugh family, and the associated land
acquisition.
Further specified the development and planning team the project has utilized in
order to meet time schedules for the project with respect to addressing
Environmental, Public Works, Community Development, Community Services,
Planning, Biology, and Park issues.
Highlighted the neighboring residential area; additionally, noting the 420-acre
dedicated open-space area.
Specified the previous meetings with the Planning Commission over the four-year
period; relayed the Commission's previously expressed recommendations (per
supplemental agenda material, Section 3, page 7); and addressed the denoted
comments, specifying the process of reducing density and increasing lot sizes.
Relayed the concerns that have been expressed at community meetings held with
the Nicolas Valley and Calle Contento Communities (denoted in Section 3, page 1,
and Section 3, page 4 of the supplemental agenda material), addressing the
referenced comments.
Presented the preliminary Tentative Tract Map, relaying the proposed timing of the
following: pre-annexation, the Specific Plan and EIR approvals, Planning
Commission and City Council approvals, the presentation of the Tentative Tract
Map, the Grading Permit, and the ultimate plan to begin construction of the first
homes.
PlanCommlminutes1063099
> Provided the specification of the lot sizes, the vadous densities (ranging from high
density residential to low density residential), the three neighborhood plans
inclusive of schools, parks, and a neighborhood commercial center; and specified
the three phases of development.
Relayed that the project would include:
· 181 acres of open space in accordance with the Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (encompassing 22-23% of the project)
· Two new schools (one 10-acre elementary school site, and one 20-acre
Middle School site)
· Four New City Parks ( two three-acre passive parks, and two 10~acre
community lighted sports parks) in accordance with Quimby requirements
· Eastern Transportation corridor
· Completion of Detention Basins in accordance with Riverside County Flood
Control Master Plan
· Water Line for Rancho California Water District (RCWD)
· Water Lines for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)
· 110,000 square foot of New Neighborhood Commercial Space
> Specified the road and signal improvement projects associated with this particular
project, and the timing associated with the phasing.
Concluded the presentation by reiterating the features that this particular project
would encompass.
At 6:58 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 7:05 P.M.
Mr. Daymude addressed Commissioner Fahey's comments, as follows:
· ~ Regarding the Environmental Impact, specified that the primary Endangered
Species associated with the project site are the Gnatcatchers, and the Quino
Checkerspot Butterfly; relayed that in order to mitigate the citing of the
endangered species there is provision of the 23% of open-space area onsite;
and noted that due to the citing of a Quino Butterfly the first phase of the
project was revised.
PlanCoi~mlminutes/063099
With respect to the neighboring communities' expressed concems (denoted
in Section 3, page 4 of the supplemental agenda material), specified the
primary Calle Contento issues, as follows:
Desire for large lot buffer adjacent to the area/addressed by proposing
location of larger lot sizes adjacent to the Calle Contento community
Desire to not have a connection on Calle Contento
Concern regarding night lighting standards/in the process of
investigation per Mount Palomar lighting standards and Public Works
recommendation
c7 Concern regarding annexation and assessment districts/addressed by
clarifying that the annexation would solely encompass the Roripaugh
Ranch Project
z:7 Queries regarding utilities/addressed by proposing that all utilities to be
stubbed to the end of Calle Contento
Concems of the Nicolas Valley Community (denoted on Section 3, page I of
the supplemental agenda material) listed, as follows:
Additional traffic generated from the project/potentially addressed by
relaying the proposed improvements and the need for provision of a
crossing which as yet has not been determined
c7 Construction traffic/addressed this issue by proposing that all
construction traffic use alternate streets other than Nicolas Road
c7 Queried annexation and assessment districts/provided clarification
regarding the issues
Relayed a desire for provision of Senior Housing/deferred this issue to
the specific developer's determination
With respect to the proposed project's consistency with Temecula's General
Plan, relayed the following:
Provision of more than 22% of open-space area
c7 The overell density of the project is under 2.6 units per acre
The link connection of Buttedield Stage Road
The diligent efforts to work with the School District since 1994 which has
culminated in specific plans regarding the school sites
For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that staff's
recommendation with respect to the Neighborhood Commemial Center would be to
incorporate a village-oriented design.
Mr. Daymude addressed Commissioner Naggar's comments, as follows:
/ With respect to querying of the advantage to the City of Temecula to enter
into the Development Agreement with the proposed project, relayed the
PlanCommlminutes1063099
speci~city of the plans for this padicular project, which would bind the project
contractually to fulfill the proposals set forth.
Regarding the proposed 10-acre Commercial Center, noted that staff has
recommended a pedestrian-oriented center; and specified the location of the
Center.
With regard to the City's recent Housing and General Plan Circulation
Element Updates, specified the efforts associated to work with the City's
Circulation Element via the City's Traffic Engineer since 1994; and relayed
that the project provides provision of standards consistent with the City's
Housing Element.
In response to querying of the project status if the City of Temecula would
deny the request for annexation, relayed that although the preference and
goal would be to annex and have this particular project be encompassed in
the City of Temecula, that the applicant would then work with the County.
Commissioner Naggar relayed the following additional comments:
While the residents have expressed opposition to connecting Calle
Contento, relayed a desire for the Commission to review the environmental
impact associated with the connection; and requested that the applicant
provide information regarding the aforementioned issue at a future point in
time.
Recommended that provision of the circulation pattern at Johnson Ranch be
provided for review since this project will abut the area.
Recommended provision of detailed information regarding the assessment
district and the associated costs in light of the negative impacts associated
with alternate assessment districts.
Requested provision of the net economic effect on the City of Temecula
associated with the Police, Fire, Medical, Flood Control, and Solid Waste
Removal Services with respect to this particular project.
For informational purposes, relayed his preference to maintain lot sizes
larger than the minimum 5,000 square foot size.
Relayed his recommendation to incorporate the majority of the infrastructure
improvements into Phase I of the development in order to alleviate
bottlenecks, and to augment the impacts if subsequent development of
Phase II and III would be postponed.
Expressed a preference to have Phase I of development encompass the
proposed Phase I and II stages.
PlanComm/minutes1063099
Suggested investigation to address future cellular phone antenna sites
associated with public utility easements.
· ,'For informational purposes, suggested that altemate sites be investigated to
the proposed school site on Murrieta Hot Spdngs Road.
For Commissioner Naggar, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified the potential
County road improvements in the area of discussion.
Mr. Daymude addressed Commissioner Mathewson's comments, as follows:
With regard to lot layout, specified that the referenced multi-family housing
phase of the project would be proposed to encompass the Panhandle site;
noted that the single-family housing would be proposed to encompass the
east side of Butterfield Stage Road; and relayed that the determination
would be refined with the final Specific Plan.
Specified that the extension of Butterfield Stage Road to La Serena Way
would be constructed during Phase I of the development.
Provided additional information regarding the proposed pedestrian trails, and
the potential for nature trails within the open-space area.
Relayed that the project would be in compliance with the proposed revised
City Ordinance with respect to cul-de-sac standards.
Provided assurance that the 15% proposed density transfer would not
impact the 5,000 square foot minimum lot requirements; and relayed that the
project would most likely not utilize the maximum 15% provision for flexibility.
Commissioner Mathewson relayed the following additional comment:
Commended the applicant for their diligent efforts associated with
addressing the concerns of the community and the previously expressed
Commission comments.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that there is
currently no proposal to amend the General Plan with respect to the high-density areas;
and relayed that she would further investigate utilization of the sports parks' lighting
poles for the potential of installing cellular antennas.
In response to Commissioner Mathewson's comments, Deputy Director of Public Works
Parks provided clarification regarding the road configuration of Nicolas Road; and
provided additional information regarding the two alternate projects conditioned to
participate in the extension of Butterfield Stage Road to Rancho California Road.
PlanComm/minutes/063099
Mr. Daymude addressed Chairman Guerriero's comment, as follows:
With regard to the Phase III development with respect to the multi-family
area, provided additional information regarding the flexibility in designated
uses for development in that specific area.
Chairman Guerriero relayed the following additional comment:
Recommended consideration for provision of Senior Housing within the
project, noting the need for such uses in the City of Temecula.
In response to Chairman Guerriem's comments, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed
additional information regarding consideration for a site location for a community college
in the City of Temecula; and noted that she would further investigate the matter and
update the Commission,
For Commissioners Guerriero and Naggar, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks
provided additional information regarding the proposed Domenigoni Parkway extension
to the 215, and the County's efforts associated with the issue; and relayed the proposed
improvements with respect to Clinton Keith Road, Scott Road, and Date Street.
Commissioner Naggar requested staff to develop a general guideline encompassing the
process by which the regional traffic is being addressed by the County, the City of
Temecula, and the adjacent cities for provision to community members expressing
concern with the continued approval of projects in light of the existing traffic impact.
Mr. Wesley Hylan, representing the applicant, for Commissioner Fahey, relayed
additional information regarding the adequate provision of corridors for the installation of
utilities; with respect to Senior Housing potentially being developed, provided additional
information, noting that when the project's fiscal study is complete, a more definitive
response could be provided; relayed the potential assessment district fees; noted that
while it is the desire of the applicant to expedite the associated improvements, this
project has no authority to accelerate the construction of the Murrieta Hot Springs Road
improvements; indicated that the 10-acre elementary school site has been revised to
encompass 12 acres; relayed the issues associated with the fencing between the school
site and the adjacent park area; and provided additional information regarding the
proposed annexation and the efforts associated to obtain compatibility.
Mr. Hylan commended the Commission for their professional, direct, specific, and
pertinent questions regarding the project.
Mr. Tom Clark, representing the applicant, relayed his involvement in the four-year
process of development of the proposed plan; and noted his enthusiasm regarding this
particular project.
PlanCommlminutes1063099
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Planning Manager Ubnoske welcomed Commissioner Mathewson to the
Commission, commending him for his input and querying regarding the
Roripaugh Ranch Project.
For Chairman Guerriero, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the Roripaugh
Project would be presented to the Commission at the first Planning Commission
meeting in August, relaying that staff would provide the EIR and Specific Plan in
advance.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Commissioner Naggar recommended that the information that he requested
during the Roripaugh Ranch Workshop be provided as soon as possible.
Commissioner Mathewson noted that he looked forward to the opportunity to
serve on the Commission.
C=
In response to Chairman Guerriero's comments regarding adequate Fire
Department provision within the Roripaugh Ranch, Planning Manager Ubnoske
relayed that the Fire Department has reviewed the Specific Plan, noting the
potential for an additional Fire Department in the general area.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:24 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday, July
7, 1999 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecuta.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
MINUTES FROM JULY 7, 1999
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 7, 1999
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at
6:00 P.M., on Wednesday July 7, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of
Temecuia City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Mathewson.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Fahey, Mathewson, Naggar,
Webster, and Chairman Guerriero.
Absent: None.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Attorney Curley,
Senior Planner Fagan,
Project Planner Brown,
Project Planner Thornsley, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
NO comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. ADDroYal of Ac~enda
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
2. Appointment of New Chair and Co-Chair
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to maintain the status quo of the
positions of the Commission, re-appointing Commissioner Guerriero as Chairman
and Commissioner Naggar as Vice Chair. Commissioner Fahey seconded the
motion, and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
planCommlminutes/070799
3. Approval of Minutes-FebruarY 17, 1999 and June 2, 1999
MOTION: Commissione~' Naggar moved to approve the February 17, 1999
minutes, as written. The, motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and
voice vote reflected approval with the excel~tion of Commissioner Mathewson who
abstained.
It was noted that page 9, first paragraph, of the June 2, 1999 minutes should
reflect that Commissioner Naggar was referencing the comments relayed at the
March 17, 1999 Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner INaggar moved to approve the June 2, 1999 minutes, as
amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote
reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who abstained.
Re~luested chanfl,e to site plan for Plannincl Application No. PA99-
0079 (Development Plan) - on the Border Restaurant located at the
Promenade mall on the corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road.
Submitted under separate cover.
Project Planner Thornsley presented the staff report; queried the Commission for
input regarding the proposed mural; specified the dimensions (12 feet by 26 feet);
for Commissioner Webster, relayed that the mural would be raised stucco
bordered by stonework; ~gr Commissioner Mathewson, clarified the location of
out-lot "K"; relayed that due to the 37-foot distance from the street staff was not of
the opinion that the mural would be a traffic distraction; specified the landscape
and sidewalk buffer between the mural and the street; noted that the color of the
wall would be off-white; for Chairman Guerriero, relayed that similar murals have
been utilized on uses in Encinitas, Oceanside, and San Diego; and specified the
materials used on the projects.
For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that there is an
existing mural in Old Town at the Temecula Stage Stop; provided additional
information regarding the desire for creativity in the center; and in response to
Commissioner Mathewson's comments, recommended the addition of a Condition
of Approval (COA) requiring the applicant to maintain the mural to the satisfaction
of the City of Temecula.
In concurrence with Commissioner Mathewson, Chairman Guerriero expressed
concern with respect to the size, relaying that the mural would be a hazard for
westbound traffic; concurring with Commissioner Naggar's comments, queried if
the approval of the mural would set a precedence for additional murals on
alternate uses in the City; and relayed that since he has not seen a mural of this
size on alternate uses in other cities, he would be opposed to the mural, as
proposed.
Commissioner Naggar recommended that the project be conditioned to remove
the mural if at a future point in time the business vacated the premises.
2
PlanCommlminutes/070799
For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarffied that the Sign
Ordinance does not address murals, and that there is no provision for allowance
of this type of mural signage in the Specific Plan.
Commissioner Webster relayed that he supported the mural, as proposed, viewing
the project as art due to the lack of a restaurant or business entity denoted in the
mural; and expressed that he was not of the opinion that the mural would be a
traffic hazard.
While concurring with Commissioner Webster's comments regarding the artistic
value, Commissioner Naggar relayed for informational purposes that the Planning
Commission recently denied the Edwards Cinema signage due to size; and
expressed concern regarding a criteria for consistency and allowable future
signage if this project would be approved.
Commissioner Fahey relayed that the General Plan does address art; queded the
criteria for determination between signage and art; concurred with Commission
Naggar's comments regarding consistency in apprevai of signage; advised that
the mural in Old Town was an odginal work, relaying reluctance to classify this
project as art since it would not actually be painted on the wall; and concurred
with the Commissioners' comments regarding concern with respect to setting a
precedence.
Planning Manager Ubnoske recommended continuing the matter in order for staff
to address the concerns of the Commission.
Commissioner Naggar reiterated the general concerns of the Commission as the
size of the mural, and the determining criteria between art and signage.
It was the general consensus of the Commission to continue the matter to the July
21.1999 Planning Commission meeting.
Re~luested chancle to site plan for Planninq Application No. PA98-
0206 (Development Plan} - Solid Rock Bookshop located at 26770
Ynez Road. Submitted under separated cover.
Advising that the applicant has requested modifications to the approved planning
application, Project Planner Thornsley presented the staff report (per
supplemental agenda material); and specified the revisions, as follows: 1 ) removal
of the cross muttons in all the six-by-six foot windows, 2) addition of a wrought
iron fence in order to enclose the patio area, and 3) changing the roof tile color to
gray.
Mr. Lee Stanton, the applicant, provided additional information regarding the
windows, providing sample material of the green-tinted glass; and further clarified
the roof color modification,
Commissioners Webster and Fahey relayed their support of the revisions.
PlanCommlminutes/070799
While relaying general concurrence to the Commissioners' comments,
Commissioner Mathewson relayed his preference to the original window design.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the revised plan.
Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. Subdivision Ordinance
Request to revise the Subdivision Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve a Resolution recommending that the city
Council adopt the Negative Declaration and approve the Ordinance.
Clarifying the rationale for the Commission continuing this Agenda Item three
times, Project Planner Brown presented the staff report (of record); relayed the
revisions recommended by the Public Works Department (per supplemental
agenda material); advised that staff conducted a study regarding the cul-de-sac
standards, providing additional information regarding the survey; noted that the
Building Industry Association (BIA) of San Diego relayed opposition to the 600
foot cul-de-sac length standards; and provided clarification regarding BIA's
CORCeFRS.
For the record, Chairman Guerriero relayed that the Commission had receipt of
the letter correspondence from BIA dated July 7, 1999, referenced by Project
Planner Brown.
Project Planner Brown addressed the concorns of the Commissioners, as follows:
For Commissioner Naggar:
Relayed the procedure of noticing the meeting with respect to this Agenda
Item, noting that the item was not re-noticed for each continuance.
Provided clarification regarding staff's rationale for not incorporating the
denoted concerns of the BIA into the revised Ordinance.
Relayed concurrence with the recommendation to revisit the Ordinance in
approximately one year for further review.
For Commissioner Webster:
Regarding the recommendation that provision for flexibility with respect to
the 600-foot cul-de-sac length be permitted per zoning district, in lieu of
PlanCommlminutes/070799
flexibility being granted per lot size, advised that staff would need to further
investigate the matter.
Clarified that the aforementioned standard would also be applicable to
commercial and industrial areas.
Provided additional information regarding lot size and arrangement (denoted
on page 9, Section B3 of the Ordinance), relaying that additional language
could be added to ensure flexibility.
Provided additional clarification regarding the term expressways (denoted on
page 10, Section E.)
Advised that the intent of the Ordinance, specifically regarding page 52,
Section A with respect to Traditional Neighborhood Development, was for to
provide technical general guidelines, relaying that the Design Guidelines
would provide additional specificity.
--' Additionally relayed that flexibility regarding the speci~city of the size of
required parkland would be further addressed in the Design Guidelines.
For Commissioner Mathewson:
Confirmed that the majority of the referenced existing 39 cul-de sacs would
not be in conformance to the revised shortened 600-foot length standards,
while the majority of existing cul-de-sacs in the City of Temecula would be
consistent with the new standards.
Advised that the 600-foot length dead-end street standard proposed is
consistent with standards maintained in other cities.
/ Relayed that additional language could be added to the Ordinance to state
that dead-end streets would be solely permitted on an interim basis.
For Commissioner Fahey:
Defined the term cul-de-sac.
Specified that the 600-foot length standard regarding cul-de-sacs and dead-
end streets would be measured from the intersection.
Commissioner Webster recommended that with regard to the flexibility within the
cul-de-sac standard that it be in conjunction with the zoning district rather than lot
size; suggested that the 600-foot cuPde-sac standard only apply to Low Medium,
Medium, and High Density Residential; and recommended that the language in
Section B3, page 9 of the Ordinance text be modified for provision to ensure
flexibility.
PlanCommlminutes/070799
In response to Commissioner Webster's querying regarding the modified approval
procedure with respect to tentative map extensions, Attorney Cudey provided
clarification; and additionally, provided clarification regarding the term compatible
(referencing page 9, Section B3 of the proposed Ordinance.)
With respect to required park size, for Commissioners Webster and Mathewson,
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised the page 40, Section 16.30.100, paragraph
A, provides provision for flexibility; and Attorney Curley further clarified the
aforementioned matter.
For informational purposes with respect to page 21, Section 16.18.160 which
references Section 16.04.110, Commissioner Mathewson relayed that he could
not located the referenced code in the Ordinance.
Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, relayed concurrence with the revised
standard encompassed in the revised Ordinance to shorten the cul-de-sac and
dead-end length standards, noting that the requirement provides for additional
safety restricting the need for commercial trucks to be forcad to back up in reverse
out of the streets due the visual aid of being able to see that the street is not a
through-street due to the shortened length.
At this time Chairman Guerriero closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Fahey commended staff for their diligent efforts associated with the
revised Ordinance; recommended approving the proposal and revisiting this issue
for further modifications after the Ordinance had been in effect for a period of time;
and concurred with Commissioner Mathewson's comments regarding allowance
of dead-end streets solely for interim periods.
Concurring with Fahey's comments, Commissioner Mathewson recommended
moving forward with the revised Ordinance, providing an opportunity at a later
point in time for addressing problem issues that arise with the implementation of
the Ordinance.
Commissioner Webster recommended the following modifications:
That the permitted flexibility for cul-de-sac lengths beyond 600 feet be
applied per zoning district
That the language be rephrased on page 9, Section B3 (regarding lot
size and arrangement) to incorporate flexibility
That the word expressways be deleted on page 10, paragraph E, and
replaced with major roadways or greater, for clarification
That the referenced flood control channel term be deleted, and the
area be treated as an open-space area
6
PlanCommlminutes1070799
Commissioner Naggar noted that he had previously addressed his concerns with
staff; and relayed his support of the revised Ordinance with the provision of
revisiting the matter in one year.
Chairman Guerriero commended staff on their fine work regarding the formation of
the revised Ordinance.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the revised Ordinance; adopt
Resolution No. 99-019, recommending that the City Council adopt a Negative
Declaration for Title 16 of the Temecula Development Code; and recommended
that the City Council approve the City of Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance, Title
16 of the Development Code subject to the attached modifications. Commissioner
Fahey seconded the motion.
For Commissioner Webster, Mr. Davidson, representing Riverside County Fire
Department, clarified that any roadway or driveway more than 150 feet in length
would be required to maintain an adequate turn-around radius for emergency
vehicles.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that while the City generally does not permit
dead-end streets, they are allowable for interim phases of development; and
relayed that staff would clarify the language of the Ordinance to state that there
would be a second point of access required.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-019
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A
REVISED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
Add
· That the Ordinance be further reviewed by the Planning Commission after
one year's implementation
That dead-end streets be permitted solely on an interim basis
That the allowable flexibility for cul-de-sac lengths beyond 600 feet be
granted per zoning district, rather than per lot size
That the language be modified on page 9, Section B3 (regarding lot size
and arrangement) to incorporate assurance of flexibility via Attorney
Curley's determination of appropriate rephrasing
· That the word expressways be replaced with the term major roadways or
greater
That the term flood control channel be deleted and that the areas be
treated as open-space areas
7
PlanCommlminutes1070799
· That the revisions that the Public Works Department recommended (per
supplemental agenda material) be added
Voice vote was taken and reflected unanimous approval.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed upcoming projects, as follows: The
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Home Depot, and various Development
Agreements, noting that the information regarding the large projects would
be provided to the Commission in advance.
Attorney Curley relayed the Development Agreements that would be
presented to the Commission and the associated eminent domain issues.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
For informational purposes, Commissioner Webster relayed the recent
proposed traffic improvements on Rancho California Road recommended
by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
Regarding the proposed Sports Park, Commissioner Webster queried
whether the proposed location of the site had been determined, and
whether the Commission would have an opportunity to review the matter,
specifically recommending that the location be sited on the west side of the
freeway.
Planning Manager Ubnoske and Deputy Director of Public Works Parks
provided clarification as to the procedure of addressing the
aforementioned concerns.
Commissioner Naggar recommended that staff provide a map for the
Planning Commission encompassing the following: 1) projects that are
existing, and 2) existing roads, in order to adequately address the impact
proposed projects would have in the area.
After receiving input from the Commission, Planning Manager Ubnoske
relayed that she would investigate the matter; and relayed that provision of
a GIS map or aerial map depicting the City and streets would be easily
attainable.
In response to Commissioner Naggar's querying, Planning Manager
Ubnoske relayed that the American Planning Association is planning a
Workshop for July 31. 1999 regarding entry level information with respect
to grading and architecture; noted that the City would fund the
Commissioners' attendance; and relayed that she would provide additional
information at a future point in time.
8
planCommlminutes1070799
In response to Chairman Guerriero's comments regarding the lighting at
the Girls and Boys Club on Pujol Street, Deputy Director of Public Works
relayed additional information.
For Chairman Guerriero, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed
that he would be agreeable to Commissioners calling to inform the City of
existing blockaded lanes of travel on streets, after improvements have
been completed, in order to expedite removal of the blockades.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:23 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday,
July 21, 1999 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
ITEM #3
CITY OF TEMCULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commiss.i ,o,D,/
Debbie Ubnoskr'~,"FF~anning Manager
August 4, 1999
Proposed Changes for Planning Application PA98-0353 (Dekkon), located on
Winchester Road, northeast of Bostik Court within the Westside Business Center
Prepared By: Patty Anders
Recommendation: Approval
The Planning Commission approved PA98-0353 (Development Plan) on October 21, 1998. The
Development Plan application approved the design, construction and operation of a 23,098 square
foot office/industrial/warehouse building. Subsequent to that approval, the developer made
significant changes to the overall site design that resulted in a 17,600 square foot
office/industrial/warehouse building. The changes were too significant to make a finding of
substantial conformance. Staff brought this item before the Commission on July 22, 1999 as an
informational item to get some initial feedback. At the July 22, 1999 hearing, Commissioner
Webster requested that the applicant consider using a darker color scheme that was similar to the
colors that were originally approved. The applicant considered Commissioner Webster's request
and would like to get approval for the new color scheme as the applicant feels the new colors are
more compatible with the existing structures in the area, and are more appropriate for a large,
industrial building.
The primary changes include a new architectural design, a new color scheme, and increase in the
total landscaped area from 22% to 27%. The previous approval included an increase to the floor
area ratio of 9%. The new design does not require an increase to the floor area ratio; however, it
does require a Minor Exception Permit to allow the reduction of one (1) parking space. Staff feels
this request will not adversely affect the project or future users; therefore staff is in support of the
Minor Exception.
Attachments:
PC Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 2
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 5
Exhibits - Blue Page 15
B.
C
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Vicinity Map
General Plan Map
Zoning Map
Site Plan (available on request)
Landscape Plan (available on request)
Elevations (available on request)
Colors and Materials Board (available on request)
Floor Plan (available on request)
R:\STAFFRPTx353pa98 pc memo,doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-__
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doe
2
A'FI'ACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE PROPOSED REVISIONS T.O
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 17,600 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE AND
WAREHOUSE BUILDING, AND A MINOR EXCEPTION PERMIT
FOR THE REDUCTION OF ONE (1) PARKING SPACE WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING A 1.08 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, NORTHWEST OF BOSTIK COURT,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-370-006.
WHEREAS, Dekkon Development filed Planning Application No. PA98~0353 in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0353 and the revised site plan request was
processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the applicant proposed significant changes to the building subsequent to the
original approval, the Planning Commission is approving a revised site design thaf does not include
the previous 9% increase in the floor area ratio, but includes a Minor Exception Permit to allow a
reduction of one (1) parking space.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the original Planning Application No.
PA98-0353 on October 21, 1998, and the revised application on August 4, 1999; at a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testi~
either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearings, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA98-0353 and the subsequent revisions;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1, That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2, Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA98-0353 makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655
(Mr. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
3
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
C. The previous environmental reviewed determined that the project would not
result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife
dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed-and graded, and
streetscape installed on site. There are no native species of plants or vegetation at the site, nor
any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A
DeMinimus impact finding was made for this project.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is in compliance with the previously
approved Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimum Findings.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 to construct and operate a 17,600 square foot office and
warehouse building with a Minor Exception Permit to allow the reduction of one (1) parking space,
and associated parking and landscaping on a parcel containing 1.08 acres located on the north
side of Winchester Road, northwest of Bostik Court and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 909-370-
006 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a
part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of Aug,ust, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of August,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R',STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
5
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 (Revised Development Plan)
Project Description: The design and construction of a 17,600 square foot two-story,
office and manufacturing building with a Minor Exception Permit to allow a reduction
of one (1) parking space, and associated parking and landscaping on a 1.08 acre site.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-370-006
Approval Date: August 4, 1999
Expiration Date: August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination
with a DeMinimus Finding required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15075, If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition,
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developedapplicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and
any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from
any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Plot Plan which action
is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code,
Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations
Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim,
action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further codperate fully in the
defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully,
developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or
hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers,
employees, or agents.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
R/~STAFFRP~,353pa98 pc memo.doc
6
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D, or as amended
by these conditions.
Eight (8) Class I lockers or Class II bicycle racks shall be provided.
A minimum of thirty-two (32) parking spaces shall be provided.
A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
The revised conceptual landscaping plan shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape
Architect. All changes and/or recommendations shall be incorporated to the landscape plan
and will be reflected in the final construction drawings.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of
the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the
Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the
landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan.
a. The maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer.
Building elevations shall conform substantially to Exhibit F and Exhibit G (color elevations),
or as amended by these conditions.
Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H, or as amended by
these conditions (color and material board).
Materials
Exterior Wall (Primary Color)
Exterior Wall (Accent Color)
Exterior Wall (Accent Color)
Exterior Wall (Accent Color)
Metal (roll-up doors)
Mullions
Glass
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
Colors
White (Vista)
Cadmium (Vista 552)
Cape Code Gray (Vista 115)
Dark Blue (Vista 523)
Gray
Black
Gray
10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation).
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
7
12.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "E", or as amended by these conditions.
The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
13.
An Administrative Development application for signage shall be required if signage is
proposed. An application for signage shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Manager.
14. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
15.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape and irrigation
plans.
16.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shaft be properly constructed and in good working
order.
17.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed refiectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces
not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (909) 696-
3000".
18 Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
R:\STAFFI{PT~353pa98 pc mcmo.doc
landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
19. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
20. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1996 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
21. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
22. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be BIS-11F.-1.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
Provide Occupancy approvals for all existing buildings (i.e. finale building permits or
Certificate of Occupancy)
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
35. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
36.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
37. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
38.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the star~ of the
building construction.
39.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
40.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
General Requirements
41.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
42.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
43.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
44.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
45.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
46.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
R:',STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc merno.doc
10
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
47.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
48.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
49.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
50.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
51.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
52.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shah be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
53.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
54.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with. Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
R%STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc rnemo.doc
55.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community I=acilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
56. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer sha~l receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
57.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
58.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
59.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of deliver.ing 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for
a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-
A)
60.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent
public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than
250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a
hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix Ilt-B
61.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
62.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo doc
12
63.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
64.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( CFC sec 902)
65.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
66.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
67.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
68.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
69.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
70.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
71.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC
Article 10)
72. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (CFC 902.4)
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc merno.doc
73.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
74.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings
housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage
of high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or
modifications to the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or
all of the following: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity
class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. (CFC Article 81)
75.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developedapplicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardotis materials from
both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
76.
A standpipe is required in the easterly landscaped yard north and east of the employee
lunch area, a minimum of 40 feet from the building.
OTHER AGENCIES
77.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated August 28, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
78.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control District transmittal dated September 9, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
79.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information
Center, University of California Riverside transmittal dated September 3, 1998, a copy of
which is attached.
80.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 27, 1998, a copy of which
is attached.
81.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations as set forth in the Police Department
transmittal dated September 1, 1998, a copy of which is attached, to the extent practical
and not in conflict with conditions contained herein.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doe
August28,1998
Ms. Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 21 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28471-1
APN 909-360-021
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353
Dear Ms: Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and
sewer service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at tr~is office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIF. ORN IA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
98/SB:mc194/F012-T6/FCF
c: Laurie Willjams, Engineering Services Supervisor
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside t
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
:gYA~nmental Health Specialist III
PLOT PLAN NO. PA98-0353
DATE: August 27, 1998
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA98-0353 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b)
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022).
c) A clearance letter from the HaTardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
· Emergency Response Plans Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2.)
· Waste reduction management.
d) A letter from the Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
NOTE:
CH:dr
(909) 275-8980
Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health Clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
DAVID P. ZAPPE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 MAPdZET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/275-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
5118o.1
C~ of Temecula
Plannin De artmerit
POSt E~t~:e ~)~x 9033
Temecula, Cal{fomia 92589-9033
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: F)/Dt (:? ~ - C/) ,~ ~7.:j'
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
titles. The District also does not lan check ci~ land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard ro,D.o. rts for su~l~cases, Dis~ct comments/recommendations for such cases am normally limited
to items of s.pqcific ~nterest to the Disthct indudin District Master Draina e Plan fadlilies, other ional flood
..d drein. e fa liti.a which could be consi · Io ica compon.n or e tension of. m.st. ;n a tern.
and District Area ~rainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). in addition, information of a general ns~ure is
provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments dQ not in any Way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
L//' This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan fadlilies nor are other fadlilies of
regional roterest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan fadlilies. The District will acre t ownership of such facilities on
wdtten request of the City. Fadlilies must be constructed to District stan~lP~rds and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check inspection and administrative fees will be
raqu rod.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
conmdered regional in nature and/or a I ical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District wobl°~ consider accepting ownershit} ot such tacJ bes on written (equest
of the City. Fadlies must be consb'ucted to District standards and D~s~ct ~an check a d inspectio will
be required for District acceptance. plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ~-~
check or money order oni to ~e Flood Control District or C~ty pdor to iesuah~u; of building or grading
permits, whichever comes ~rst. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the
actual belTniL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project mar uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water
Resources Con~'~ie~oard. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this pro'ect involves a Federal Emergen~;y Management Agency (FEMA mapRed flood plain, then the C' should
require ~e applicant to provide .11 studies, calculations, ~lans and o~er ~nformation r_erl_uimd to m~ FEMA
requirements, and st~uld further require that the a plicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR)
pdor to grading, racordation or other ,final approva~of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR(~ pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a ticant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~ater Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wdtten correspondence from these a encies
indicating the project is exempt from these requwements. A Clean Water Act Sectjon 401 Water Quail Cer~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of ~e Corps 404
permit.
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
~ate: ~- q - ~F~
City of Temecula
Temecula Police Department
September 1, 1998
Planning Department
PA98-0353 (Construction of warehouse/office building)
CasePlanner: Pat'o/Anders
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, the Police Department
recommends the following 'Offer Safety' measures be provided in accordance with CIty of Temecula
Ordinances end/or rscognlzed police safety standards and tzdnlng codes:
1. Applicant shall ensure ell landscaping surrounding the building 8m maintained at e height no greater
than thirty-six (36) inches.
2. Applicant shall ensure all trees on the propert,/ate maintained away from the building so as to deter
roof acoeesabilltn/for suspect(e).
3. Additionally, plants, shrubbery end trees will be maintained in areas not designated for foot traffic.
These areas will be maintained so as to have deer visibility by patrons end prevent concealment by
suspect(s) to hide themselves both day/night time hours-
4. Light fixtures shall be Installed to Illuminate all parking ereas, driveways, end pedestrian walkways.
These areas shall be lit with a minimum maicteined one (1) foot candle ef light at ground level, evenly
dispersed across the surface, dimlrmatlng all shadows. All exterior light fixture~ shall be vandal resistant
and poaltioned so a~ not to produce glare. The installation of all exterior lighring shall be in compliance
with Mt. Palemar LIghting Ordinance.
5. Vandal resi~tent light fixtures she~ be Installed above ell exterior doors and loading dock areas around
the building. These light fixtures shell illuminate the door surface wlltq e minimum maintained one (1) foot
candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed, All tights shell be in compliance with MT. Palemar
Lighting Ordinance.
6. All exterior lighting shall be controlled by timers or other means that prevent the lights from being
turned off by unauthorized persons.
7. Upon completion of the building, e monitored alarm system shall be Installed to deter unauthorized
entn//burglanf and to notify the Police Department of unauthorized intrusion.
g. NI doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miecellaneeue hardware shall be of
commercial or Institutional grade.
9. Any public telephones located on. the exterior of the facility shall be placed In · well-lighted, highly
visible area, and Installed with a "Call-Out Only' feature to deter Ioltering.
10. Street address shall be posted in · visible location, minimum 12 Inches in height, on the street side
of the building with a contrasting background.
11. All roof hatches shell be painted 'InternaUonsi Orange.*
12. The address for the location shall be painted on the roof using numbers no leas then four (4) feet in
height, In a color whiGh contracts the background.
Any questions regarding these conditions can be referred to the Police Depad,,ent Crime Prevention
262e.
CALIFORNIA
I'IISTORICAL
I~ESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
Eastern Information Center
Department of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
F~x (909) 787-5409
September 3, 1998
Patty Anders
City of Temecula
Planning D~partment
P. O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Case No.:
Applicant:
PA98-0358
Pacific Capital Investment/Marchand Dennis
Dear Ms. Anders
Please find enclosed our comments for the project transmittal as requested by the Planning
Department. If you have any questions, please contact the Eastern Information Center at
(909) 787-5745.
PA98-0358 ........................................ Sept.8,1998
Sincerely,
Martha Smith
Information Officer
Enclosure(s)
CALIFORNIA
ttlSTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
Eastern Information Center
Departroent of Anthropology
University of California
Riversicle, CA 92521-0419
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW
DATE:
RE: Case Transmittal Reference Designation:
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have
been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources:
__ The proposed project area has not b~n surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural
resource(s). A Phase I study is recommended.
_3~Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study
is recommended.
__ A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, duc to the nature of the
project or prior data recover)' studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not
recomrncndcd.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while
a qualificd archaeologist evaluates the rinds and makes recommendations.
__ Duc to the archaeological sensitivity of the area. earthmoving during construction should be monitored by a professional
archaeologist.
__V/'~ThThc submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological
Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin
4(a), December 1989.
Phase I
Phase li
Phase
Phase IV
Records search and field survey
Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.]
Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two.]
Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
VICINITY MAP
r,,,,i
5r,,,ALE: N.T~.
CASE NO. - PA98-0353 (DEKKON)
EXHIBIT -
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPTx353pa98 pc memo.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
,,:.:,:.: -
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
BP H
BP
H
CC
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BUSINESS PARK
CASE NO. - PA98-0353 (DEKKON)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
P > BP
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98 pc memo.doc
ITEM #4
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
Prepared By: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA99~0229 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Sherry C. Evens
To operate a Large Family Day Care Home
43047 Camino Casillas, south of Pauba Road, west of Via Rami,
within the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan
SP Specific Plan No. 219 (Planning Area 20 - Medium High density,
5-8 dwelling units per acre)
North:
South:
East:
West:
N/A
Specific Plan No. 219
Specific Plan No. 219
Specific Plan No. 219
Specific Plan No. 219
LM (Low Medium density residential, 3-6 dwelling units per acre)
Single Family Residence
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single family residential, Paloma del Sol Elementary School
Single family residential
Single family residential
Single family residential
R:\STAFFRPl~.29pa99.PC.dOc
BACKGROUND
On June 7, 1999 Sherry Evens submitted an application for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to
expand her existing licensed childcare home, "Granny's House," from a Small' Family Daycare
(maximum capacity of eight children with two children at least six years of age and no more than
two infants), to a Large Family Daycare Home (maximum capacity of 14 children with two children
age six or older and no more than three infants). Pursuant to the California Child Day Care
Facilities Act, the City processed the application as a nondiscretionary permit that uses a lot zoned
for a single-family dwelling for daycare purposes.
On June 23, 1999 staff mailed to adjacent property owners a Notice of impending Action to
approve the application within 14 calendar days unless a formal request for a public hearing was
received. A written request was faxed to the Planning Depadment on June 30, 1999. Because
staff received other correspondence and telephone calls in opposition to the project, the Planning
Manager determined that the project should be noticed for a public hearing before the Planning
Commission.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Once the applicant is licensed to operate a Large Family Daycare Home, Ms. Evens intends to
increase the maximum capacity of "Granny's House" to 14 children. She intends to continue
providing childcare between the hours of 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday. Ms. Evens is
the sole proprietor and has no plans to hire additional staff.
ANALYSIS
State Law
In 1996 the California Legislature found and declared that "there is a severe shortage of child care
for school-age children throughout California, with many school-age children going home to an
empty, unsupervised setting after school." Written in Section 1597.40 are the following statements:
"It is the intent of the Legislature that family day care homes for children should be situated in
normal residential surroundings so as to give children the home environment which is conducive
to healthy and safe development. The Legislature declares this policy to be of statewide concern
with the purpose of occupying the field to the exclusion of municipal zoning, building and fire codes
and regulations governing the use of occupancy of family day care homes for children, except as
specifically provided for in this chapter, and to prohibit any restrictions relating to the use of single-
family residences for family day care homes for children except as provided by this chapter."
City Development Standards
State law instructs cities to grant the use permit for large family day care homes if the applicant
complies with local ordinances prescribing reasonable standards for spacing and concentration,
traffic control, parking, and noise control. Both property owners or providers who reside in rental
property are eligible. The City's Development Code specifies Design Standards for Family Day
Care Homes in Section 17.06.050, and staff found that the project can meet or be conditioned to
meet these standards.
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.dOc
2
Response to Notices
As of the writing of this staff report, two letters and two phone calls in opposition were received
(one call was anonymous). Seven letters in support were faxed, including corre. spondence from
the Department of Social Services which claims that, as of December 1998, "there was a shortfall
of 10,987 licensed family child care spaces in Temecula zip code areas." Additionally, a petition
with nine names and addresses on Camino Casillas was submitted. All letters, minutes of the
phone call from Toni Arbogast, and the petition are attached to this staff report. Several concerns
such as staffing and supervision, square footage available for children and adults, and police
records at the residence, are issues that will be covered or required by the Department of Public
Social Services prior to inspection and issuance of a State license. Other issues raised concerned
noise, traffic and parking, and spacing of facilities.
Noise
The project is conditioned to provide an outdoor play area in the rear yard of the residence, and
to provide rear and side yard fencing six-feet in height. Language in the City's Municipal Code
regulates excessive noise as a nuisance subject to Code Enforcement action.
Traffic and Parkina
Neighbors indicate that children play in Camino Casillas, and that the increase in traffic generated
by the project will exacerbate this problem. Streets are designed, constructed and maintained for
vehicular traffic, and the nearby park or school grounds are recommended for play areas. If the
Large Family Day Care reaches its maximum capacity it would add 12 additional trips to the site.
This increase is considered negligible, relative to the capacity of the access streets. Camino
Casillas is constructed to accommodate traffic in this neighborhood including the project. The
project is conditioned to keep the driveway clear during daycare hours for customer drop-off, so
as to minimize the use of on-street parking. The project is conditioned to limit the children's play
area to the rear yard of the residence.
Spacinq of Facilities
The Development Code limits Large Day Care Facilities to be a minimum of 300 feet from each
other. There has been no other application for a Large Day Care Facility in the neighborhood.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Section 15274 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines indicates that CEQA does
not apply to the establishment or operation of a large family day care home as defined in Section
1596.78 of the California Health and Safety Code.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
In accordance with State Law, this project is exempt from municipal zoning.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project as conditioned complies with the requirements of the City's Development Code, and
meets the regulations set forth in State Law for Large Family Day Care Homes. Therefore, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission approve this application.
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.dOC
3
FINDINGS
The proposed conditional use is exempt from municipal zoning in accordance with State
Law. However, the proposed conditional use complies with the requirements of the
Development Code.
The proposed conditional use is compatible in nature, condition and development of
adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely
affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed Large Family Day Care
Home is conditioned to operate under a bona fide license from the Department of Public
Social Services and under the conditions of approval for the project in order to be
compatible with residential uses in the area.
The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping. and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. The project is conditioned to provide an outdoor play
area in the rear of the property, properly fenced and landscaped.
That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional
use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the
Planning Commission or City Council on appeal.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 4
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8
Correspondence and Minutes of Phone Calls - Blue Page 11
A. Susan Bittner letter dated June 2?, 1999
B. Lloyd and Judith Edwards fax dated June 30, 1999
C. Toni Arbogast call on July 1, 1999
D. R.L. Hungate fax dated July 27, 1999
E. Pamela Baylard fax dated July 19, 1999
F. Mindy Richardson fax dated July 21, 1999
G. Jennifer L. Eppel fax dated July 21, 1999
H. Kenneth Daniel Broach and Wendee L. Breach fax dated July 27, 1999
I. Rebecca S. Waters fax dated July 27, 1999
J. Gary Andary, Department of Social Services, fax dated July 23, 1999
K. Petition from nine residences on Camino Casillas
Exhibits - Blue Page - Blue Page 12
A. Vicinity Map
R:\STAFFRP'r~.29pa99.PC.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
R:',STAFFRPT~229pa99,PC,dOC
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0229 (MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERM|T
THE OPERATION OF A LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME
LOCATED AT 43047 CAMINO CASILLAS, SOUTH OF PAUBA
ROAD, WEST OF VIA RAMI, WITHIN THE PALOMA DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
955-203-005
WHEREAS, Sherry C. Evens filed Planning Application No. PA99-0229, in accordance with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0229 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0229, on
August 4, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0229;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Conditional Use Permit Findinqs. The Temecula Planning Commission, in
approving Planning Application No. PA9-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the
following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is exempt from municipal zoning in accordance with
State Law. However, the proposed conditional use complies with the requirements of the
Development Code.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The proposed Large Family Day Care
Home is conditioned to operate under a bona fide license from the Department of Public Social
Services and under the conditions of approval for the project in order to be compatible with
residential uses in the area.
R:~STAFFRPT~.29pa99,PC.doc
6
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping,
and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. The project is conditioned to provide an outdoor play area
in the rear of the property, properly fenced and landscaped.
E. The decision to approve or conditionally approve the application for a conditional
use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning
Commission at the time of their decision.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Section 15274 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines indicates that CEQA does not apply to the establishment or operation of a
large family day care home as defined in Section 1596.76 of the California Health and Safety Code.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) to
permit the operation of a Large Family Day Care Home at 43047 Camino Casillas and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 955-203-005, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on
Exhibit A (Conditions of Approval), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of AugUst, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the PLanning
Commission of the City of Temecula at its regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of August,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.doc
7
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.dOc
8
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
The use hereby permitted is for a Large Family Day Care Home
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
955-203-005
August 4, 1999
August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof. advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0229, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any use allowed by this conditional use permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
5. Hours of operation shall be between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The Large Family Day Care Home shall operate under a bona fide license as same from
the California Department of Public Social Services, and a business license for same from
the City of Temecula.
The Large Family Day Care Home shall provide an outdoor play area in the rear of the
property, which is properly secured and with a six-foot high solid decorative fence.
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.doc
9
g.
10.
11.
Materials, textures, colors and design of the fence shall be compatible with onsite and
adjacent properties. All fences shall provide for safety with controlled points of entry.
Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with residential standards applicable to this
Planning Area of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan No. 219.
Children's play area shall be limited to the mar yard, and the use of public streets as play
areas shall be strictly prohibited.
The applicant shall maintain two enclosed spaces for vehicle parking at the home.
The applicant shall keep the driveway clear during day care hours for customer drop-off
parking.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\STAFFRPT~,29pa99.PC.doc
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CORRESPONDENCE AND MINUTES OF PHONE CALLS
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.doc
/
From the Desk
Susan Bittner
43035 Camino Casilhts
Temecula, CA 92592
(909) 302-0146
Attn: Direaor of Phnnlng
City of Temecula Planning Division
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecttla, CA 92591
June 27, 1999
Re: Case No: Plamng Application # PA99-0229/Shen'y C. Eveus
We have just received a copy of the Notice Of Im,nel~din,,~ Action regardinE a Large Family Daycare
operation at the ~rl,t,~s directly adjacent to our home. As a homeowner and neighbor, we are vehemently
opposed to this action for a n,mber of reasous as outlined below:
Paloma del Sol is a private residence area, not a business area. We don't want this or any type business
within the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan and especially on our street. Camino Casffias Street is a heavy
IX~C ale& T~ ar~ apptv,-'imateJy 3 u~t~ p~r mlntlte Waveling on this sta'~t. There is no speed limit
posted and the children or their toys often go inw the street, causing near accidents on a few occasions.
There is inadequate parking. Already the driven of the children almdy attending this child care
opomtion block our driveway as we are leaving and coming from work, or lunch times. They block ous
wash pickup area, and have no regard for us as neighbors.
The children are inadequately supervised. They leave trash around the yards, play in other people's
flower gardens and have left broken spnnklers in our yard. The dog at that address is frequenay allowed
to roam outside unleashed causing other dogs to bark Toys, furniture and other items are left outside
overnight making the neighborhood alype~ unsightly.
There have been police called to this address in the past. There has been 1 case where a child broke his
ann while under their care, and it went uureponed and unlreaied by hotIx Sheny Evens and the childs
mother.
Sherry Evens is not a home owner in Paloma Del SoL Neither rent or mortgage has been paid or this
address in over a year since the Evens ~ed bnnlffupWy (public notice spring of 1998, Press Emerptise.)
The homeowners dues has not been paid in an even longer time. They are nothing more than sqtla~r' s a~
this address pending litagation by the ownezs and the Merit Property Owners Association,
No business of this size should be approved in this area, especially by a non-homenwner: As the first
homeowner m Paloma Del Sot, and a 10 year resident of Temecula, I will do whalevet is necessax~ to stop
this from being app, uved, and if it does get approvecL I will continue to argue these points with the City of
Temecula and the Planning Division specifically. I will remember this come voting time!
Thank yon,
Susan Bilmer
. JUL 1 1999
eclnesday
June ]0, 1999 9:~2am -- Fr~n '1 ~r"76 7890# -- Page
To; T~mecula City Planning I~ent
P.O. Box 9033
Temeettla, Ca., 92589-9033
From: I .Ioyd and Judith Edwazds
28972 Via La Esl~lda
Mumeta, Ca., 92563
AUention: Carole Donahoe. AICP
R,E; Plnnning Applicat~on No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
We hereby submit our request for a public heating rcgurding this permit applieatlon.
We don't feel that it is an ao~.-pmble u~e For the propeay for the following reason.~:
1. The house is a 1508 square foot, 2 stray house. Thc living area downstairs consists of
a liv~ngroom, kitchen and ~ bath. Leas than '~ of the housc is downslah's living area.
To put 14 small ohik~cn (or more, including The caretakers' children), and the adults
rcquircd to catc for thcm in a less than 700 squurc foot area for up to 12 hours a day is
ludic-rom. |t's not a situation in which I would want to leave a child.
2. There is very lim~,.~d F~rking area in the whole neighborhood. To have as many as lO
or morc cars t~ying to be tmrked in front of neighbors' houses, at the time Of day
when most lmople ire leaving for work and coming home could be problcmatic.
3. Association rules pmhfolt the u.~ of garage~ for any puq~ose other than parking
vchiclcs. in order to provide additional insigc morn by using thc garage, the owners
of the house w/ll be in violation of CC&R 's.
4. It is my tmderatmul~ that it isn't a problem r, onducting a busi ne~ in a residence as
long as the~e would not b~ a lot of people coming and going, to and from the bottle.
This is definitely a coming and going situation.
5. There is a park at the end of the street, but the s:reet is where the neighborhood
children play. Thero isn't a day when there arcn't bunches of children, and their
fathers phying; in the middle of the street, some of them no more than 2 or 3 years
old. If there me older 0hildren in the daycare facility, bow many of them will be
added to thou ~ players?
6. If you give a permit for one for such use, it w/ll pave the way for others to want to do
thc same thinf~ There are several other homes nearby taking in as many as 4 or 5
children sJmady.
CITY OF TEMCULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: NOTE TO FILE
FROM:
Carole Donahoe
DATE: July 1, 1999
SUBJECT: Response to Public Notice - Planning Application No. PA99-0229
Telephone call received from Toni Arbogast, who lives on Cabrera Street. She is
concerned because she has noticed that there are a lot of kids who play in the street
on Casillas, without adult supervision. She sees this condition everytime she comes
home from work. She is concerned that the project will generate more traffic, and
creating a safety hazard for these kids who play in the street.
I told her that we would ask the daycare facility to use the parks nearby, not the street
for play. I suggested that streets are for vehicles, not for play area.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTSXPLANNINGXFORMS\merno.dOc
JTuesday duty 27, 1999 :]:/,Spa -- Free ,9096997~6' -- Page It
7-27-1999 ~: 07;:~ ~ <a,JNWEST_REALTGRS. 9896997~ P_ 1
City of ~,l,
43200 Business Park Drive
~,l~, Califcclia 92589-9033
Jl~ly ZT, 1999
li,~..e~ised ~ae~l'itieS such
24511 O..ea,erce Ce'tter Drive
Suite A-1
~a.la, r'~l;~=axn'da 92590
jTuesday Ju(y 27, 1999 5:S0pm -- From '9096997t,66, -~ Pege 31
7--27-- 1999 ,~: 1 ~ F'RGM E~I'~VE:~T_I:~_ALTC3RS. ~7a66
July 19, 1999
Pamela Eaytmyi
Terncoda, C,A 92591
Tewhomltmaycoacera,
My x'da~lo~l,ip with Sbeny Evens and ~ molJ~', ldm'r,~,,~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 1998 w~n I ~
~ ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~t~ folt~ ~ ~g,
cxaffsionsawayfzomtliehomc. 1Viy~mildl~ui~drigtiatbonM:wheulheyar~alSheny~sandthmSAYS
A LOT!!H i~ou~a daycam iwx~'ide~.
lncoudusioa, l am awa~ of the simatiou~thelltdeboythalShen'yoc~asiomllyp~f~
~hats~i~beingfa~se~y~fbei~g~h~e~s~x~a~kf~r~N~inghimnm~s~i~the~eighb~rh~L
~BUT, lalie~ihallhaves~uhim m~ilhmy own eyes playing inflontofhisowllyaidw~tNOp~of
~74E~
7- M-qq
p...5
_.,qbec, y' ~'v'ar~ o,r,d h~r chi Ic~co-~ bu~sine-ss-
T. live across 4h~
~ r rL, L~
on C~i~o Gs;llas.,T
v~y plea6an+ ~ responsible n~jh~:~or:.
On accaa;~en she hoS bOe~+che.~ rnc~ doilctren-
-nqis hos ~ a- rnu~k~oJl/q_jra.-Wy, n3 e~.rienc6.
Z+ is di~cu~l+ -C-or n'~ do irnc~inc
o_nqor~ u3od8 re3;s+a-r cempto~n+s o, gajns~ Sher~
:r fed s/'~ runs lf--r b.jsr~ss in
v'e~/' c~pprepr;aJe. rr~nm_,r. 'Fo k'c~a If_,r hour..
so ,qa7' o J) cah;~, prou;a;r~U
ac4~v~-F, es -for 4h& d3i lc[rQq iS
:::F-(::: .'-r co..n be c>F 4...r41,t-,r ckSS;,s-hg,-nc.e..
4::e4 fr~ -b cc>n+ac4- rrr-.-o.,--t-(,qc~3
(Tuesday July 27. 1999 5:50~x, -- Fram '9096997/.66, -- Page
7--27-- 1999 5:13:>f4 FRC]H SLt,/WIEST_RF_AL,TC]RS.
R~: EvansFaxmlyDayCa~
Propo~l for Large F~,~,'ly l:hy Care
To 1~aom i~ May Concern:
May tbi~ letter serve to xeeommend Sherry Evans for a Large F~y Day Care License.
My two ehlTldren age~ 7 ~r~ and 4 yr~ have be attending the above n~ntioned day
for over on~ year, and hav~ been extremely happy tl~re.
Tiz front yard i~ always kept imam-relate,, ~ the grass well ~atensxt and flowers and
The inside is wall mganized with various edu~tlonal toys, in addition to arts and craf~
t~t the. chac~en paztL'k~te in
Thare are a]ways at least two to three adm'ts supervising the chx3dre~ t!~oug~ut th~ day.
C)n on~ oecasion my son had slipp~ on the sidcwalk near ltr home and was noted by a
physician a week tate~ ofa slig!~ i,,airline fracture. She was very eonoem~ over this
~ even though it did not happen on her property.
Sherty~saverylovingamlcaringpersonandithasbeenapleasmebavingbcrcateformy
chlklten. lfI w~_~'t relocating my teaid~nc~, she would stilt be caring [or my childm~
It is fommat~ to hav~ a fansay day care center ~ Evans Fami~ Day Car~
mothen to b~g their chndren tO mtbe~ than ba~g to tnk~ them to a
busine~" day care environmeat.
] sl~il be please to respond to any cl~_e~tions you may have. You can teach me nt 619-
456-6202.
ITuesday JuLy 27, 1999 5:5Opm -- Frm ,9096997/,66, -- Page
7--27-- 1999 i:.: 1 ~ FRt3~ SIJ~IWEST_RF_ALTC3R5,
iTuesday JuLy 27, 1999 5:50pl -- Free *909699?/,66* -- Page TI
7-27-1 ~ 5: 1 ~ ~ ~T__~T~. ~7~ P. 7
Legal Rights Counselors Fellowship
41811 Ivy ~ Suite C - Muftieta, CA USA 92562
07/27/99
ToWlmmltMayConcera:
I am writing this let~.r in regards to the Evens Family Dayc~re. I have taken my son to
the Even's for 5 monlhs and am very coetticlent in the care that my son receives. He is well
m~ated and is vety happy whh the Even's- .........
Their home is not just a home, but a place of business as well. The hous~ is always in
sanitary conditions and meets all saf~'y t~gulatioas. The chikl~n ate under complete supervisioa
at all times and I feel deeply confident in the ca~ my son receives and will continue to take him
to the Even's ~.
Thank yon for taking this inlD cOnSideration.
Phone (9G9) 698-4909 Fax (909) 698-1719
Website: httl~'J/www. Lega/R~ghtsCaunsek~.com
Documcnti
tiuesday JuLy 27, 1999 5:SOpe -- Free '~7~6' -- Page 81
7-27-1999 5: 1 ~ ~ ~LJNIiEST_I:~=,i~TCRS. 91;E~69974.6~
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
3737 Main $bee~ Suile 7O0, Rive~ide, CA 92501
(909) 7824200
July 23, 1999
P. 8
lVl& Sherry Evens
43047 Camino C. asillas
Teme~ula, CA 92592
Re: Large Family Child Care Application
And Conditional Use Permit
Dear Ms. Evens:
This letter is writ~n to support your application to the City of Temecula for a Conditional Use Permit to operatB
a large family child care hon~. Local jurisdictions are limited regarding the conditions they may impose on
Largc Family Child Care Homes by Section 1597.40 of ~e CAlifornia Health & Safety Code. "Preemption of
local zoning, building and tim codes and regulations...", and Section 1597.46, "I .ar~ fanffiy day car~ homes".
A city may simply allow theso homes to operate, grant a nondiscretionary permit, or require the home to apply
for a permit to use a lot zoned for single-family dwellings. Within the permit process, citi~ may only regulat~
the areas of spacing and onnccntration, traffic, parking, and noise control, and these standards must be adopted
specifically into the ordinance, In point of fact, problems in these areas are rare, and many neighbors and local
officials react to their anticipated fears of what a family child care home might bring, rather than understanding
that thc state licensing is designed to ensure a safe, regulated enviwnment for children who are already living in
the b,,..,tediate comity, and for whom thcro may be no other alternative than to be left unsupervised during
large periods of the day or in unsafe, informal car~ arrangements,
With t. hc inctea~ in the workforce du~ to the improving economy, as well ~ Cali fomi a's Welfare-to-Work
initialires, moxo children than ever are in need of care. I am enclosing the Child Care Indicators profile,
completul by the Rivmide County Office of F_,ducation, and the Community Child Care Planning Form for The
Tcmecula Valley, which was used to document axeas of need for child care capadty building. Please note that, as
of last December, there was a shortfall of 10987 licen~'ed family child care space~ in Temecula zip code areas.
I understand that the City of Tcmecula h~ favorably reduced it's Conditional Use Permit fee to $190, and that
you am scheduled for a hearing (a 100 foot radius for neighbor notification is permitted by state law). Please feel
free to shaw this letter with the Tcme~ula Planning Commission.
Sincerely,
Gary~dary~Advocate Program
(909) 782-6637
CHILD CARE INDICATORS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Prepar~lby
Riv~ County Office of Education, Chlklren's Services Unit
December l 0, ! 998
INTRODUCTION
Riverside County's child care delivery system is comprised ofa v3riety of service proriders including
public and private child care centers, family child ca~e homes, and fTiends or relatives caring for
childre~ The diversity represented offers parents the ability to select quality care s~ttlngs that allows
fsmili~ to work and children to thrive,
Over the past few years, thc child c-ar~ service delivery system has been dramatically impacted by an
increase in maternal employment rates, parcnt's recognition of the hnportancc of early educational
experiences, and by weftare reform, Federal and s~,_~' lcgishtors havc increased public support for
child care and pn~chool programs wifia funding being doubled between 1996 and 1999.
Local planners and community leaden must consider a amber of indicators to determine the
cff~-ctivcness of existing child care programs and the need for addil~onal child care services in
Riverside County. The d~a that has been collected and presented on the following pages provides
information about existing services as well as documented increases in family ueed.
OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS
In F,.ivcrside Cotmy there is an increa~in5 demand for child care services and a lack of available child
care spaces_ Currenfiy, there more than 300,000 children birth to thiaeen years residing in Riverside
County yet there a~ only 29,000 licensed child care spaces. Riverside COunty has been identified by
the California Department of Social Services and by the California Depa_nment of EducaXion as one of
twenty-five counties in the st,re with the greatest need to increase the supply of child care.
Based upon the CalWORKs report for September 1998, there are 55,947 children in Riverside County
on TANF. Approximately 21,865 of these children have parents who have recently returned to work.
and an additional 34,082 children have parents needing to obtain employment. The large numbers of
children suddenly entering child care puts a tremendous burden on the already overloaded child care
system in Riverside County. Parents frequently cannot find child care, and often have no real child
care options due to the limited supply. In some communities, parents are turning down job
oppontmities or driving considerable distances to child care programs. With the implementation of
Welfare Reform, families need immediate access to child care services when jobs ate offered. The
lack of child care programs in Riverside County forcing families to make less than appropriate child
care decisions.
ITuesday July 27, 199~ 5:50pm -- From ,90~6997&66' -- Page 10~
According to the California Basic Educational Data, 15% of the children in Riverside County ate
currently on TANF and 50% are eligibk for flee or reduced meals. The Waiting List fbr subsidized
child care, limited to parents below 75% of the state median income, has grown to 12226 children. In
Riverside Cotlnty, there are more thatl 110,000 children living in families with an income less than
75% of the s~t,- median income.
In Western Riverside County, parents frequently eonunute to Los Angeles or Orange County for
employment The commute time is extensive with parents leaving their children for 11 or more hours
per day. The~e is a ggat need for mote extended child care hours, both early morning and extended
evening hours, m meet commuterneeds. There is also a serious problem with school age childn~n
needing aRer school care and supervision.
In the Coachella Valley to BIT, he region, parents are typically employed in farm labor, service
industries, and hotels. The need in this area is for more evening; overnight, and rotating hour care, as
well as bolldays. Additionally, many of the families are limited and non-English speaking with
Spanish as their native language. 44% of the families in Riverside County are Hispanic and, in the
Eastern Coachella Valley, the number rises to 96%. Many of these families are Limited and Non-
English speaking.
ThroughOut tl~ County there is aneed for increased numbers of providers offering evening, weekend,
infant/toddle, school age, mildly ill, and holiday child care. Additional child care subsidies are
needed for low income working families and for parents enrolled in educational or training programs
le, qtlln~ tO self-sufficiency
j Tuesday duly 27, 1999 S :50pm - - From #9096997/,66' - - Page 11 I
7--27-1999 .~,: 1 ~ Fl:~3F4 SLFIWEST_F:aEALT(~S. 91;~9G,997.46~
P. ll
I~lanagmtn; Butletin egg- I.c
APPI..ICATION FOR ~l~(; .' P:u~e ? of 2'
®
-,nr3
p:~'~:~ J~lu~D
S;:~wOH pU'E galU~.D
::km',D Pl!qD '{l!~u~.-I
.?
]Tuesday July 27, 1~ 5:501x -- Free '~096~7~/~' -- Page 12t
7-27-1999 .~: 18R,4 ~ ~ST_~T~.
p. 12
/
CITY OF TEMF, CLq, A
P~G DEPARTS.
~.MF..CULA, CA, 9259O
RE;Ca NO; P~G APPLICATION # PA-.0229/SHERRY C. EVENS.
I live ;n ~ m~a of Sheny Evens Family Child Care. I support and have no
problems with a iarEe child care operazion with the undastandin~ there will
adequate supe~isio~
NAME . ADDRESS SUPPORT
~ '~ ' .
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPT~229pa99.PC.doc
12
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0229 (MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- AUGUST 4, 1999
VICINITY MAP
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~-29pa99.PC.doc
ITEM #5
Prepared By:
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 1999
Planning Application PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit)
Thomas K. Thornsley, Project Planner
The Community Development Department - Planning Division
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit) based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein; and
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit) pursuant to Section
15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Brian Price, Breckenridge Group
PROPOSAL:
Planning Application No. PA99-0077 is a proposal to construct
and operate a 3,800 square foot Burger King fast food
restaurant with drive-thru service, on a one acre lot.
LOCATION:
Located on the south side of Winchester Road between
Margarita Road and Ynez Road.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Site CC (Community Commercial)
EXISTING ZONING:
Site SP-7 (Retail Commercial)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: CC (Community Commercial)
South: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
East: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
West: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Promenade Mall
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Nodh: Commercial Center
South: Promenade Mall
East: Power Center
West: Barnes & Noble (under construction)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP'~77pa99 BK.doc
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Project Area Net: 44,041 square feet 1.01 acre
Total Building Area 3,888 square feet 9 %
Landscape Area: 17,759 square feet 40 %
Paved Area: 17,451 square feet 40 %
Hardscape: 4,943 square feet 11%
Parking Required:
I spaces per 100 square feet of dining
23 spaces
Parking Provided:
29 spaces
Building Height: 24' 8"
BACKGROUND
The application was formally submitted to the Planning Department on March 4, 1999. Several
Development Review Committee (DRC) meetings were held between March and June while the
applicant worked with staff to resolve site issues and to provide architecture consistent with the
mall. The project was deemed complete on July 19, 1999.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to build and operate a Burger King Restaurant with a d. rive-thru service.
The project is located on Winchester Road, at a major entry into the Promenade Mall, between
Margarita and Ynez Roads. The building with be 3,888 square feet with a 2,300 square foot dining
area and an indoor/enclosed children play area at the front of the building facing Winchester Road.
They are proposing a 2,300 square feet of dining area providing the restaurant with a total capacity
for 108 seats.
ANALYSIS
Site Desicln and Circulation
The overall site is one acre with the building on the east side of the site. Surrounding the building
on three sides of the property are Winchester Road to the north, the entry drive to the east, and
the Mall Ring Road to the south. The only access to the site is from the Ring Road and it is a
shared driveway with Barnes & Noble to the west. Once on the site, a loop drive aisle will allow
vehicles to circulate past two rows of parking located in front of the restaurant. Due to the
confinements of the site and its limited access, several site plan revisions were made to
accommodate Fire Department vehicles. All vehicles how have the ability to circulate through the
site and negotiate all the turns.
Initially, the site plan was revised to achieve the required six vehicle stacking distance behind the
menu board. This put the drive-thru along the extreme boundaries of the site. However, during
the last site plan revisions the menu board was inadvertently relocated to the entrance of the drive-
thru. Staff, with the applicant's concurrence has conditioned the site plan to be modified for the
proper placement of the menu board.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP"R77pa99 BK.doc
2
Parkinq Analysis
This project fall under the parking standards of the Temecula Regional Center Specific, which
requires restaurants to provide 10 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of dining area. With 2,300
square feet of dining this project will require 23 parking spaces. Twenty-nine parking spaces are
provided.
Architecture & Colors
The building design utilizes architectural features found on the elevations of the mall such as the
wall finishes and columns, roof elements and similar colors. The restaurant is rectangular building
with an attached square building offset at one end housing the children's indoor play equipment.
Exterior walls around the restaurant will be 18 feet high and finished in "Ostrich Feathers" (beige)
stucco with accent column pop-outs, accent bands and cornice capping finished in "Winnipeg
Sand" (tan). The play area walls will be 24 feet high with windows and stucco walls. Along the
base of the entire building will be a two foot band of red split face concrete block veneer. Over the
drive-thru, main entrance and the restaurant windows will be aqua colored canvas awnings.
Landscapinq
Three sides of this site are along roadway with landscaping that contribute heavily to the sites forty
percent (40%) landscaping. Additional landscaping is provided around the building and at the
entrance. Most of the perimeter landscaping is part of the malls master landscape design creating
the major entry into the mall. All of the roadways are tree lined. Along Winchester Road are Tulip,
Calabrain Pine, and Crape Myrtle trees. The mall entry drive is lined with Holly Oak and the Ring
Road has California Pepper trees. At the base of the building will be a mix of scrubs and flowering
plants surrounded by ground cover and turf. The drive-thru lane runs along side of the mall entry
driveway and is being screened with landscaping. To provide additional screening and to help
shield the glare of headlights from cars, the project is being conditioned to install some berming in
the landscape area along the drive-thru.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for
Planning Applications No. PA99-0077.
Section 15332 applies to in4ill development projects on sites that: are less than five (5) acres and
substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services.
The affected area of the site development meet all of the criteria noted above, and therefore the
proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
R:\STAFFRPT\77pa99 BK,doc
3
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project is consistent with the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation and the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) zoning applicable to the property in the Temecula
General Plan and Development Code. Upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit as
conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and standards for commercial development
prescribed by the Development Code and Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development,
and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and
employment base.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposal, a fast food restaurant with drive-thru services, is consistent with the land use
designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards
in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific
Plan (SPo7) development contained in the City's Development Code and the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found
to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The
project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide
Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are
no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in~ll site. Furthermore,
grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The
project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. The proposal, a fast food restaurant with drive-thru services, is consistent with the land use
designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards
in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
4
Plan (SP-7) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of
commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions,
and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and development
of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site
improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with,
all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures.
The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved development plan.
The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the building while
meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to
integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as
conditioned, will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the
community
The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time of
their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a
Public Hearing where members of the community have had a oppodunity to be heard on
this matter before the Commission renders their decision.
\\TEMEC_FS101',VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.dOC
5
Attachments:
1.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11
Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 21
Exhibits - Blue Page 24
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation
F. Landscape Plan
G. Floor Plan
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRp'R77pa99 BK.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK,doc
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0077 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT OF A 3,888 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL
BUILDING ON ONE ACRE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO OPERATE A FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-
THRU SERVICES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ
ROAD, KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO.
910-320-001 AND LOT A OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA99-
0007.
WHEREAS, Brian Price, Breckenridge Group, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0077,
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0077 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0077 on
August 4, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Applications No. PA99-0077;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and am hereby incorporated by
FefeFence.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a 3,888 square food commercial building on a one acre site, is
consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC)
land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards
for Specific Plan (SP-7) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density
of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7), the City Wide Design
Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient
Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
8
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
are no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Conditional Use Permit Findines. The Planning Commission, in approving
Planning Application No. PA99-0077 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a fast food restaurant with drive-thru services, is consistent with the
land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards
in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan (SP-
7) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned
and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State
law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt.
Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and
building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated
site improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all
applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development
will be constructed and fundion in a manner consistent the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
C. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved
development plan. The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate
the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as conditioned,
will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community
E. The decision to approve the application for a conditional use p~rmit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time
of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%77pa99 BK.doc
9
Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on this matter
before the Commission renders their decision.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0077 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This
Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The
subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0077 for a Development Plan for the design,
construct and operation of a 3,888 square foot commercial building on one acre and a Conditional
Use Permit to operate a foot fast food restaurant with drive-thru, located on the south side of
Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel No.
910-320-001and Lot A of Lot Line Adjustment PA99-0007, and subject to the project specific
conditions set forth in Exhibit A (Development Plan), and Exhibit B (Conditional Use Permit),
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1999,
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of August,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%77pa99 BK.doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~77pa99 BK.doc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0077 (Development Plan - Burger King Restaurant)
Project Description:
A proposal to build a 3,888 square foot commercial
building for restaurant use (Burger King) located on Out-
lot "K"" of the Promenade Mall, on the south side of
Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez
Road.
Development Impact Fee Category:
$2.00 per square foot (pursuant to the
Development Agreement for the Promenade
Mall Project PA96-0333)
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
910-320-001
August 4, 1999
August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to. take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK,doc
12
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division.
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent
locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view.
b. The menu board shall be relocated closer to the building so that there is sufficient
stacking distance for six car behind the menu board within the drive-thru aisle.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer
or any successors in interest.
a. Two additional Liriodendron Tulipeferra (Tulip Tree) shall be installed to comply with
the streetscape plan for these trees to be planted 40 foot on center.
b. Mounding shall be provided in the landscaping adjacent to the drive-thru aisle to
provide additional shielding of vehicle headlights.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined
to be necessary by the Planning Manager the parapet will be raised to provide for this
screening.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with Exhibit "H" (Color and Material Board) contained
on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation
from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Planning Manager.
Material Color
Stucco walls painted to match
Stucco cornice & color band to match
Stucco accent
Metal trim painted to match
Aluminum Storefront System
Windows
Split Face Concrete Block Veneer
Canopies
Sherwin Williams #SW1074, Ostrich Feathers
Sherwin Williams #SW1316, Winnipeg Sand
Sherwin Williams #SW1066, Salmon Suede
Sherwin Williams #SW1462, Park Bench
Sherwin Williams #SW1320, Tasteful Tan
Ford's Vision Glass, Clear
Orco Block Co., Red
Sherwin Williams #SW, Tourmaline
9. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No.
PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval.
R:\STAPFRPT\77pa99 BK.doc
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
11. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, and H", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan.
Color and Material Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided by
the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and submit five (5) full
size copies and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "D"
(Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "C", the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
12. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit
"H" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the
colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
14. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions.
The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One ( 1 ) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15, An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "E", or as amended by these conditions.
a. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the
approved Exhibits "D" and "E", or as amended by these conditions.
16. Bicycle racks shall be installed pursuant to the requirements of the Development Code.
17. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
18, Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager. to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
R:\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
19.
24.
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified I:;y a permanently
affixed refiectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces
not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
25. Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall
complete all conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan
all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
26. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-
way.
28. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
29. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
30. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
\',TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
31. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
32. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide any upgrading or
upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements
necessary to make required improvements.
33. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Planning Department
b. Department of Public Works
34. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
35. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
36. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
37. The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded grant deeds, which reflects the approved
parcels in accordance with Lot Line Adjustment PA99-0007 to the Department of Public
Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
38. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
39. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of aft intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%77pa99 BK.doc
16
40. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
41. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
42. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
43. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
44.
45.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
46. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1996 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
47.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
48.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
49.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
50, The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B.
51. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
52.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
53. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
54. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
17
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
65, Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when buildin9 plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
66.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-IIFA-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM
for a total fire flow of 2200 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may
be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type,
or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The
Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC
903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
67. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access roadIs)
frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
%\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP"R77pa99 BK.doc
18
68.
69.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shail have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility
or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall
be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness
of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902)
70,
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen
(13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
71.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
72.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall
be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
73.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
74.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building.
The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)
inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses
shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
75.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
76.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an
fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central
station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10)
77. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided, The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and
be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be
supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4)
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK,doc
OTHER AGENCIES
78. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated March 16, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
79. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated March 25, 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
%\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R77pa99 BK.doc
20
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL I-~ALTH
DATE: March 25, 1999
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PA99-0077
02
1- The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit No. PA99-0077
~.d has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in tills area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CtlECK SUBMITTAL for health cleartrice, the following items are
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Thre~ complete sets of plans for each food establiqhment will be submilled, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022.
c) A clearance letter fxom the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has be~n fleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· HaTardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requircmcnts not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan n~riew for final DcparUnent of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson
F
!lan
March 15, 1999
Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
LOT NO. 80F PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1
APN 910-320-001
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner,
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
99',SB:mC067~012-T6~FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
%\TEMEC~FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'~77pa99 BK.doc
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit - Burger King
Restau rant)
Project Description:
A proposal to build and operate a 3,888 square foot fast
food restaurant (Burger King) with drive-thru service
located on Out-lot "A" of the Promenade Mall, on the
south side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road
and Ynez Road.
Development Impact Fee Category:
$2.00 per square foot (pursuant to the
Development Agreement for the Promenade
Mall Project PA96-0333)
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
910-320-001
August 4, 1999
August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real prepedy subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable-and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
\\TEMEC+FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
22
4.
5.
6.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0077, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
The installation of the landscaping and screen wall along Winchester shall be in substantial
conformance with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits F & I) for the purpose of screening
the view of the service bays from the public fight-of-way. Pdor to the release for occupancy
staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verify that they provide the
intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager shall have
the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the intent of
the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be
the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
At the end of the first year of occupancy, and prior to the release of the Landscape Security
Bond, the landscaping will be inspected for conformance with the screening requirement.
Should replacement landscaping be needed the owner will be required to make these
improvements.
The use of window signs will be limited to those permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance No.
98-10 and in no case shall more than 20% of the window areas be used for signage.
OTHER AGENCIES
9. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated March 16, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated March 25, 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have mad, I understand and I accept all the above
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicanrs Signature
Date
Name printed
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
23
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~77pa99 BK.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
~J '/ Library
Cou~house
·
\ Square
,CHF
~"/ <~'~""~'~' ' ~0"
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 4, 1999
CI
c~
Via Las Cha
~ /
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPl~77pa99 BK.doc 25
Project Site
CITY OF TEMECULA
/ ~<I~'~'~I"~'~I~V~
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
p -
ZONING MAP
SC
SC
sc -'~
%,
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077 {Conditional Use Permit)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 4, 1999
CC
./
GENERALPLAN
F~:\STAFFRPT\77pa99 BK.c~oc 26
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINCHESTER ROAD
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 4, 1999
BURGER KING SITE PLAN
R:',STAFFRPT\77pa99 BK.doc 27
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE o August 4, 1999
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT\77pa99 BK.doc 28
CITY OF TEMECULA
\
WINCHESTER ROAD'
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 4, 1999
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\77pa99 BK,doc 29
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 4, 1999
FLOOR PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\77pa99 BK.doc 30
ITEM #6
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0168 (Development Plan
Case Planner: John De Gange, Project Planner
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 99-~ approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0168 based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein~, and
2. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0168 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
APPLICATIONINFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN:
ZONING:
LAND USE:
PUBLICINPUT:
Sullivan Bay Co,
Tim Shook Company, Inc.
The design, construction and operation of two 6,000 square foot
commercial speculative buildings on a 0.99 acre parcel.
The north side of Enterprise Circle South (27525 Enterprise Circle
South)
SC Service Commercial (subject site and surrounding the site)
SC Service Commercial (subject site and surrounding the site)
Subject: Vacant
North: Commercial building (Farmer Boy's Fast Food
Restaurant)
South: Commercial building
East: Commercial building
West: Vacant
To date the staff has received no public input on this application.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRP'r~168PA99.PC,dOC
1
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscaped Area:
Parking/Paved/Hardscape:
Lot Coverage/Floor Area Ratio:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
43,000 square feet (0.99 acres)
each building is 6,000 square feet [total of 12,000] (28% of
site)
8,605 square feet (20% of site)
22,395 square feet (52% of site)
0.28
12,000 square feet: 40 Vehicles, 2 Bicycles
40 Vehicle Spaces, 2 Bicycles
each building is 19' high (single story)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal is for two 6,000 square foot commercial speculative buildings on 0.99 acres located
on the north side of Enterprise Circle South (27525 Enterprise Circle South). As proposed, the
project consists of two identical commercial building shells with a small office/rece. ption component
and a large undesignated and unimproved open area.
BACKGROUND
This project was originally submitted to the City by this same applicant as a proposal for a single
building. That application was withdrawn in favor of this application which was formally submitted
on May 3, 1999. The plans for the project were reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC)
on May 27, 1999. The project was deemed complete on July 19, 1999.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
The project site is located on Enterprise Circle South, which is a loop road that takes access off of
Winchester Road in two locations (east and west of the project site). The subject site is located
adjacent to the Farmer Boy's restaurant to the north, and an existing commercial building to the
east. Across Enterprise Circle South to the south is an existing commercial building and adjacent
and to the west of the site is a vacant parcel. Generally, the area is built up with existing
commercial buildings, similar in design to this proposal.
ANALYSIS
Site Desicln
The project is located on the north side of Enterprise Circle South. Access to the site is provided
from a single centrally placed driveway. Parking for the project is located in the front of the
buildings and behind the buildings. Loading doors have been placed in the rear of each building,
out of view from the street and the front portion of the site. Loading is to take place inside the
building. An employee patio area is being provided in front of the building on the eastern portion
of the site. Decorative stamped concrete paving is being placed within the drive way entry way.
The design of the site is compatible with existing development in the area.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
The project takes access from a single driveway off of Enterprise Circle South with parking
provided in the front and rear of the buildings. The parking in the front will primarily be utilized
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC.dOC 2
for customer parking. Access to the rear of the building is taken from a central drive aisle
between the two buildings. Trucks will access the loading areas in the rear of the building
through the central drive aisle. Emergency vehicles have access to all parts of each building
from the parking areas along the front and rear of the building,
Architecture
The project consists of two identical buildings that will be tilt-up concrete with smooth,
painted panels, with a band of sandblasting, and varying accent colors in shades of gray, white
and burgundy. The front entries for the buildings are highlighted with the use of a recessed
storefront, windows, sectional cutouts in the upper fa,cade and decorative paving at the
entries. The applicant is also adding visual interest and articulation to the other elevations in
order to help break up the building's mass. This has been accomplished with the use of an
indented corner along the insides of the front elevation, a sandblasted band along the bottom
of the buildings, a series of painted reveals, varying paint colors, and burgundy recessed
accent diamonds extending around all elevations. These features create interest and to some
extent help to break up the mass of the walls of the buildings. The landscaping within the
planters around the fronts and outsides of the buildings compliment the building and help break
up their massing. As proposed, the structure is compatible with the existing buildings in the
area in terms of colors, materials, height, bulk and mass.
Landscapinq
Twenty percent (20%) of the site has been landscaped which is consistent with the 20% minimum
landscaping requirement in the SC (Service Commercial) zone. The project provides a landscape
planter around the entire perimeter of the site, ranging in width from five wide on the side property
lines to fifteen feet along the front and rear property lines. Two five foot by twenty three foot
planters are being provided along the front interior corners of both buildings to help screen the drive
aisle which runs between the buildings from the street. In addition, the applicant, at the request
of staff, has also increased the landscaping along the drive to screen this drive aisle and the front
parking lot area.
Traffic Analysis
The Public Works Department has reviewed and calculated the expected traffic impacts associated
with this project. It has been concluded that daily trips generated will not exceed what was
anticipated by the General Plan Circulation Element for this site given that the project's Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) is less than what has been anticipated by the General Plan. To address the impacts
associated with increased traffic on Winchester Road at its intersection at both legs of Enterprise
Circle South, and at Jefferson Avenue, the applicant will be required to provide traffic signal
mitigation through the payment of development impact fees (DIF) as part of the conditions of
approval for the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0168 will be made pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332.
Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that: are less than five (5) acres and
substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for
\%TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%168PA99,PC.doc 3
endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services.
The site meets all of the criteria noted above, and therefore the proposed project is eligible for a
CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is SC (Service Commercial). Existing zoning
for the site is SC (Service Commercial). A variety of commercial/retail and office uses are
permitted within this zone, with the approval of a development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of
the Development Code. The project as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and the Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all applicable City ordinances,
standards, guidelines and policies. It is staff's opinion that the project is compatible with
surrounding developments in terms of design and quality.
FINDINGS
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (SC)
Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for (SC) Service Commercial development contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The
project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide
Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are
no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore,
grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The
project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
\\TEMEC_FS10fiVOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC.doc
4
Attachments:
PC Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 19
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Elevations
G. Floor Plans
H. Landscape Plan
\%TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRP'i%168PA99.PC-doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%168PA99.PC.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'~'Y
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0168, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF TWO 6,000 SQUARE
FOOT COMMERCIAL SPECULATIVE BUILDINGS (TOTALLING
12,000 SQUARE FEET) ON 0.99 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH (27525
ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH) KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 909-270-053
WHEREAS, the Sullivan Bay Company/Tim Shook Company, filed Planning Application No.
PA99-0168, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0168 was processed including, but not limited
to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0168 on
August 4, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0168;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0168 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (SC)
Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for (SC) Service Commercial development contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically
suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned
is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building
codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the hea~th and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC.doc 7
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0168 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This
Section allows exemptions for infill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The
subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0168 (Development Plan) for the design,
construction and operation of two 6,000 square foot commercial speculative buildings on 0.99 acres
located on the north side of Enterprise Circle South (27525 Enterprise Circle South) and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 909-270-053 subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 4th day of August, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of August,
1999, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
\%TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRP~168PA99.PC.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99-PC-doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA99-0168 - Development Plan
Project Description:
Construct and operate two 6,000 square foot commercial
speculative buildings on a 0.99 acre parcel
DIF Category:
Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
909-270-053
August 4, 1999
August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Depadment - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real prope~y subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99,PC.doc
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Floor Plans), and H (Landscape Plan),
contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. if it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer
or any successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
7. All compact parking spaces will be marked for "COMPACT CARS ONLY."
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall:
Secondary wall colors:
Secondary wall colors:
Sandblasted bands:
Accenting and trim:
Glass:
Store Front:
Dunn Edwards 3005-Boulder Gray
Dunn Edwards 3006-Winter White
Dunn Edwards 3008olcy Orbit
Sandblasted Finish
Dunn Edwards 3008-1cy Orbit
Solar Bronze
Anodized aluminum-Black
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
10.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
11.
The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H and I", (Site Plan, Grading Plan,
Elevations, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final
conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department -
Planning Division staff, and shall submit five (5) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1"
copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of
approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved
Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC.doc
11
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
12. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule,
13,
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions.
The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
B.
C.
D.
E.
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
14.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by the~e conditions. A
separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits
"D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions.
15.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
16.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the landscape plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that
year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition
satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
17.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING~STAFFRP'R168PA99.PC.doc
12
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
18.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
General Requirements
19. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
20.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Pubiic Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
21.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
22, A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
23.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
24.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
25.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRP"~168PA99.PC.doc
26. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Planning Department
b. Department of Public Works
27.
28.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying ma. ps related to the
subject property.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
29.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
30.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
31. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
b. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shah be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
32.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
33.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
34. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
35. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNiNG\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC.doc 14
36.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
37. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 Edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
38. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
39. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
40. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
41. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/F-I/S-3.
42. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
43. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
44. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
45. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
46 Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
47. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
48. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
49. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
50. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
51. Provide appropriate stamp of registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
52. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC.doc 15
53.
54.
55.
56.
Truss calculations that am stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
57.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
Uniform Building Code (CBC), Uniform Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
58.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may
be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type,
or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The
Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC
903.2, Appendix Ill.A)
59.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill.B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. {CFC
903.2, 903.4,2, and Appendix Ill-B)
60.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess
of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required.
For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
61.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99,PC.0oc
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility
or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall
be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness
of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen
(13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall
be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all com~nercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building.
The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)
inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses
shall post the suite address on the rear door(s), (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an
fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central
station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and
be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be
supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99.PC,doc
71.
72.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid
entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC
Article 81 )
OTHER AGENCIES
73.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal dated June 3, 1999, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by
the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
74.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water Districts transmittal dated May 12 1999, a copy of which is attached.
75.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated May 13, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%168PA99.PC.dOC
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Plannin De artment
Post O~ce ~x 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
A.e.tion: ,To 4
Ladies and Gentlemen:
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/955-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
5118o. i
Re: PA o/6g'
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not lan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for sucnP cases. Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific roterest to the District including Distdct Master Draina e Plan facilities, other re ional flood
control and draina · T'acilities which COuld be COnsidered a logical component~or extension of a master ~n s stem,
and Distdct Area Brainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general ns~usre is
provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
COnstitute or imply Distdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
This prpject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional ~nterest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The Distdct will acce t ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be COnstructed to District standPards, and Distdct plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
conmdered regional in nature and/or a Io 'cal extension of the adopted
Maste Drainage Plan. The District woul~ COnsider accepting ownership of such facffibes on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and Distdct plan check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ~ L
check or money order only to t~e Flood Control Distdct pdor eo~ issuance of bui or gradin permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of ~he actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project ma re uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water
Resources Con~ol Board, Clearance for grading recordation, or other final approve?should not be given until the
C ty has determined that the project has been granted a permit or s shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federai Emergen,~y Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the Ci should
require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other Information required to me~ FEMA
requirements. and should furlher require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR)
pdor to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMRI pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a licant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the Ca~domia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean PV~ater Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or wdtten correspondence from these a encies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quaff Cert~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of ~e Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: ~ -~ -~X
TO:
FROM:
RE:
"2OUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: May 13, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: To Whom It May Concern
GREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
PLOT PLAN NO. PA99-0168 (Previously PA98-0348 was submitted, but withdrawn)
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA99-0168 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b)
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be
submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to
ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference,
please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022.
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615,3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
GD:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
stand3b.doc
Wa r
John F. Hennigar
PhiHip L. Forbes
Kenneth C. Dea]y
Linda M. Fregoso
C, Michael Cowett
Best Best & Krieger LLP
May 12, 1999
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP 28007
APN 909-270-051
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0168
To Whom It May Concern:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
99\SB:mr109\F012-T1 \FCF
C: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPTH68PA99.PC,doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA99-0168
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
VICINITY MAP
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\168pA99.pC.docpC
CITY OF TEMECULA
i Project
Site
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP BUSINESS PARK
CASE NO. - PA99-0168
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
BP
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\168PA99.PC.docPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0168
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
SITE PLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\168PA99.PC.docPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0168
EXHIBIT o E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, '1999
GRADING PLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~168PA99,PC,dOCPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA99-0168
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
ELEVATIONS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNiNG\STAFFRPT\168PA99.PC.docPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA99-0168
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
FLOOR PLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING%STAFFRpT\168pA99,pC.docpC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0168
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- AUGUST 4, 1999
LANDSCAPE PLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\168PA99,PC,dOCPC
ITEM #7
STAFF REPORT-PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0115 (Development Plan)
Case Planner: John De Gange, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No, 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0115 based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein; and
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0115 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Don Mosco
REPRESENTATIVE:
Vince Maganuco
PROPOSAL:
The design, construction and operation of a 13,400 square foot
industrial speculative building on a 0.97 acre parcel.
LOCATION:
The west side of Colt Court, approximately 200 feet south of
Winchester Road
GENERAL PLAN:
BP Business Park (subject site and surrounding the site)
ZONING:
LI Light Industrial (subject site and surrounding the site)
LAND USE:
Subject: Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Industrial building under construction. (Burkey Machine
and Tool
Industrial building under construction (C&H Office
Specialties)
Vacant industrial parcel (proposed Mosco project)
Industrial building (Bostik [2"d phase under
construction])
PUBLICINPUT:
To date the staff has received no public input on this application.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.docPC
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscaped Area:
Parking/Paved/Hardscape:
Lot Coverage/Floor Area Ratio:
Parking Required:
Office - 800 square feet:
Manufacturing - 6,200 square feet:
Warehousinq - 6,400 square feet:
Total - 13,400 square feet:
42,253 square feet (0.97 acres)
13,400 square feet (32% of site)
12,675 square feet (30% of site)
16,178 square feet (38% of site)
0.32
3 Vehicles
16 Vehicles
6 Vehicles
25 Vehicles, 1 Bicycles, 0 Motorcycles
Parking Provided:
Standard Spaces:
Bicycles:
Motorcycle Spaces:
Total Standard Parking Spaces Provided:
24
4
,
25
Building Height:
24' (single level)
the code allows the replacement of vehicle parking at a rate of two motorcycle spaces for one vehicle
space)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal is for a 13,400 square foot industrial speculative building on 0.97'acres located on
the west side of Colt Court, approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Colt Court and
Winchester Road. As proposed the project consists of an 800 square foot office area, 6,200
square of area devoted to manufacturing uses and 6,400 square feet of warehousing space.
BACKGROUND
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant on January 14, 1999. The formal application
was submitted on March 24, 1999, and the plans were reviewed by the Design Review Committee
on April 15, 1999. Following the DRC meeting, the applicant and staff met on three additional
occasions to discuss and work out issues relating the design of the site and the project's
architecture. Once these issues were resolved, the project was deemed complete on July 19,
1999.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
The project site is located on Colt Court, which is a short cul-de-sac taking access.off of Winchester
Road. The subject site is located between two projects recently approved and currently under
construction (Burkey Machine and Tool to the north and C&H Office Specialties to the south).
Adjacent and to the west of the site, is a property which takes access off Bostik Court. This
property is significantly higher in elevation and contains the Bostik building that is currently in
operation with a second phase under construction.
An application by the same applicant has been received for an additional industrial speculative
building on a lot directly across the street on Colt Court. This project is also to be considered by
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.doCPC
2
the Planning Commission at this meeting. If these two projects am approved, entitlements for
construction will have been granted for all the lots on Colt Court.
ANALYSIS
Site Desicln
The project is sited near the end of the cul-de-sac on Colt Court with the building located on the
northern property line. Parking is located along the front of the building within the eastern portion
of the site and along the southern portion of the site. The driveway is situated at the southeasterly
corner of the property. Loading activities will occur at the rear portion of the site, screened from
public view by the building itself, as well as the large slope along the rear of the property and by
landscaping. The employee patio area is located along the front of the building near the office
component of the project. The design of the site is compatible with existing development in the
area.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
The project takes access from a single driveway off of Colt Court. There is parking and
vehicular circulation along the front of the building and the southern portion of the site. Truck
traffic is accommodated through the main drive aisle with a truck turn around and a backing
area in front of the loading docks, which provides more than adequate room for the
maneuvering and backing movements of trucks. Customers will utilize the parking at the front
of the building and employees will use the parking areas within the southern and southwestern
portion of the site. The Fire Department has access to the entire building from the parking
areas along the front of the building and southern part of the site.
Architecture
The building will be tilt-up concrete with smooth, painted panels and painted accent colors.
The north and east elevations will have a sand blasted band with an alternating series of
spandrel glass windows. The south elevation has a band of alternating sections of sand
blasting as accenting. The west elevation, which faces a 25 foot 2:1 upslope, is proposed
with only smooth stucco with painted accent bands. The office entry appears as a projected
entry statement by virtue of the fact that it is five shorter than the rest of the building.
The applicant has created visual interest for the elevations with the use of painted reveals,
sandblasted accent bands, spandrel glass windows and varying paint colors. These features
provide a certain amount of interest and to some extent help to break up the mass of the
building walls. The applicant's use of landscaping throughout the site and berming along the
front of the project compliments the building and helps to break up the building's massing.
Because the north elevation is on the property line the applicant is relying on the landscaping within
the six foot wide planter on the adjacent Burkey project (currently under construction) to help
screen and soften this elevation. In addition, the applicant is using architectural enhancements
such as sandblasting and spandrel windows to break up the massing of this elevation and to add
visual interest. The rear of the building is not visible from the street and is screened from the
adjacent Bostik project site by a 25 foot upslope, which is on average approximately 30 foot wide
and fully landscaped. As proposed, the structure is compatible with the existing buildings in the
area in terms of colors, materials, height, bulk and mass except that this building is the smallest
of the five buildings on Colt Court which are either under construction or being proposed.
\%TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRpT~115PA99.PC.dOCPC
3
Landscapinq
Thirty percent (30%) of the site has been landscaped which exceeds the 20% minimum
landscaping requirement in the LI (Light Industrial) zone. The project provides a twenty foot
bermed landscape planter along the front of the property, a 7 foot wide perimeter landscaping
planter along the northern perimeter and a 30 foot wide planter along the rear of the building. The
applicant, at the request of staff, has also added a landscape planter along a portion of the
southern wall of the building, which helps to break up the massing of this elevation.
Traffic Analysis
The Public Works Department has reviewed and calculated the expected traffic i~pacts associated
with this project. It has been concluded that daily trips generated will not exceed what was
anticipated by the General Plan Circulation Element for this site given that the project's Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) is less than what has been anticipated by the General Plan. To address the impacts
associated with increased traffic on Winchester Road and at the intersection of Winchester and
Diaz Road, the applicant will be required to provide traffic signal mitigation through the payment
of development impact fees (DIF) as pad of the conditions of approval for the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0115 will be made pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332.
Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that: are less than five (5) acres and
substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services.
The site meets all of the criteria noted above, and therefore the proposed project is eligible for a
CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is BP (Business Park). Existing zoning for the
site is LI (Light Industrial). Manufacturing/office/warehouse uses are permitted with the approval
of a development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as
proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is consistent with the General Plan, Development
Code and the Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all applicable .City ordinances,
standards. guidelines and policies. It is staffs opinion that the project is compatible with
surrounding developments in terms of design and quality.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.docPC
4
FINDINGS
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (BP)
Business Park development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for (LI) Light Industrial development contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of industrial development proposed. The project
as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local
ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design
Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are
no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore,
grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The
project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Attachments
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 19
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Elevations
G. Floor Plans
H. Landscape Plan
%\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99-PC.docPC
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNiNG\STAFFRPT%115PA99.PC.docPC
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0115, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 13,400 SQUARE FOOT
BUILDING ON 0.97 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
COLT COURT, 200 FEET SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-360-005
WHEREAS, Don Mosco, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0115, in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0115 was processed including, but not limited
to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0115 on
August 4, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0115;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are herebY, incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0115 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (BP)
Business Park development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for (LI) Light Industrial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site
is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density
of industrial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the ~ealth and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
\%TEMEC_FS101%VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING~PLANNING\STAFFRPT%115PA99,PC.dOCPC 7
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0115 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This
Section allows exemptions for infill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The
subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0115 (Development Plan) for the design,
construction and operation of a 13,400 square foot building on 0.97 acres located on the west side
of Colt Court approximately 200 feet south of Winchester Road and known as Assessor's Parcel
No. 909-360-005 subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 4th day of August, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4t.h day of August,
1999, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~PLANNING\STAFFRP'r~115PA99.PC.docPC
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING%STAFFRP'T~115PA99,PC.docPC
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA99-0115 - Development Plan
Project Description:
Construct and operate a 13,400 square foot industrial
building on a 0.97 acre light industrial parcel
DIF Category:
Business Park/Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
909-360-005
August 4, 1999
August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shah hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99,PC.docPC
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the promises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Floor Plans), and H (Landscape Plan),
contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped aroas shall be the rosponsibility of the developer
or any successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
7. All compact parking spaces will be marked for "COMPACT CARS ONLY."
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall:
Reveals:
Sandblasted bands:
Accenting and trim:
Glass:
Anodized aluminum:
Vista # 300 "Flat White"
Dunn Edwards # 142 "Opaline"
Medium
Vista # 300 "Semi-Gloss White"
"Sea Green"
"Black"
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forLh in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
10.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
11.
The applicant shall rovise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H and I", (Site Plan, Grading Plan,
Elevations, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final
conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department -
Planning Division staff, and shall submit five (5) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1"
copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of
approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved
Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development DeparLment
- Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.dOCPC
11
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
12. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
13.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions.
The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
B.
C.
D.
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of planrings and irrigation (in accordance with. the approved
plan).
14.
A maintenance easement shall be secured and recorded over the northerly adjacent
property of sufficient width to maintain the subject property's northerly building wall.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. A
separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits
"D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions.
16.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
17.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the landscape planrings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that
year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition
satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
18.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed re~ectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
\%TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING~STAFFRPT%115PA99.PC.dOCPC
12
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued fpr
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
19.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT
20. Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall
complete all conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan
all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
21. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
22.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
23.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
24. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include al] necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
25.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
26.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
27.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
ATEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.docPC
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide .any upgrading or
upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements
necessary to make required improvements.
28.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
29.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Planning Department
b. Department of Public Works
30.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying ma. ps related to the
subject property.
31.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County FLood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
32 Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
33.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
34.
The Developer shall pay to the City the PubLic Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
35. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC,dOCPC 14
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
36. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
37.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
38. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 Edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
39.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street,lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
40.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
41.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
42. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/F-I/S-3.
43. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
44.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all detai~s on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
45. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
46. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
47. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
48.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
49.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
50. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRP"~115PA99.PC.doCPC
15
51. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
52. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
53. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
54. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
55. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
56. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
57.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
Uniform Building Code (CBC), Uniform Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
58.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSi residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may
be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type,
or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The
Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC
903.2, Appendix Ill.A)
59.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill.B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2,903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
60.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess
of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required.
For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPl~115PA99.PC-docPC
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any
cul-de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460)
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility
or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall
be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness
of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen
(13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building.
The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)
inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip cen, ters, businesses
shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS~PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.docPC
17
71.
72.
73.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and
be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be
supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902,4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid
entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC
Article 81 )
OTHER AGENCIES
74,
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside Cou~nty Flood Control
District's transmittai dated April 8, 1999, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by
the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
75.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set fodh in the Rancho California
Water Districts transmittal dated March 31 1999, a copy of which is attached.
76.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated April 1, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I furlher understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to th.e project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING%STAFFRPT~115PA99.PC.dOcPC
18
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
PIe nin De ar~ment n
Post O~ce ~x 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
A.ention: ,.TOH
Ladies and Gentlemen:
PJVERSIDE, CA 92501
909,955 - 1200
909/788-9965 FAX
511801
Re: 'TM 2,3/471- / (PA
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not lan check cit~ land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for su~c~ cases. Dist~ct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific ~nterest to the District including District Master Draina e Plan facilities, other re ional flood
control and draina · facilities which could be considered a logical componenPor extension of a master ~!~n s stem,
and District Area Breinage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general ns~¥usre is
provided.
The Distdct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply Diathct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
This prgject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional tnterest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The Distdct will acce t ownership of such facilities on
written requeat of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Disthct stan~rds, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check inspection and administrative fees will be
requ red.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a Io ical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The Diatdct would] consider accepting ownership of such taoht~es on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and Disthct plan check and inspection will
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of~he actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORM.~.,TION
This project ma re uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water
Resources Con~ol l]oard. Clearance for grading recorderich. or other final approva?should not be given until the
Cty has aleterm ned that the project has been granted a permit or s shown to be exempt.
If this project involves e Federal Emergency Mana9ement A9ency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the Ci.~' shculd
require the applicant to provide all studies calculations plans and other reformation required to me~:~ FEMA
requirements. and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR)
prior to grading, recorderich or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMRI prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project the City should require the a licant to
obtain a Section 160111603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~ater Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Co~s of Engineers. or written correspondence from these a encies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Cert~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of ~e Corps 404
permit.
.V~ rs
~'[I'UART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer
John F, Hennigar
March 31, 1999
John DeGange, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28471-1
APN 909-360-005
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0115
Dear Mr. DeGange:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and
sewer service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
99\SB:mc082'uc012-T5\FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
TO:
FROM:
2OUNTY OF RIVERSIDE '
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: April 1, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
: John eGange
g~(JD~SON, Environmental Health Specialist III
PLOT PLAN NO. PA99-0115 (TR28471-1, Lot 5)
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA99-0115 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b)
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022.
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE:
Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson
stand3b.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
\%TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~115PA99,PC,dOCPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO, - PA99-0115
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
VICINITY MAP
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING',STAFFRPT\I 15PA99.PC,docPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
-/~ ect Site
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Project Site
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP BUSINESS PARK
CASE NO.- PA99-0115
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT\115PA99,PC,dOCPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
/
/
/
/
CASE NO. - PA99-0115
EXHIBIT o D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
SITE PLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANN~NG\STAFFRPT\115PA99.PC.dOCPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
r
/
/
/
/
/
CASE NO. - PA99-0115
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
GRADING PLAN
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNlNG\STAFFRPT~115F'A99.PC.docPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA99-0115
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
ELEVATIONS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA%DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\115PA99,PC.docPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
°t
t=LoOIL Ptkkt Z3{~ -
CASE NO. - PA99~0115
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
FLOOR PLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT\115PA99.PC.~ocPC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA99-0115
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
LANDSCAPEPLAN
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\115PAg9,PC.dOCPC
ITEM #8
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0116 (Development Plan)
Case Planner: Steve Griffin, AICP
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0116 based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein, and
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-
0116 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Don Mosco
REPRESENTATIVE: Vince Maganuco
PROPOSAL: The design, construction and operation of a 22,200 square foot
industrial building on a 1.28 acre parcel.
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 28471-1 (east side of Colt Court)
BP Business Park (subject and surrounding)
LI Light Industrial (subject and surrounding)
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN:
ZONING:
LAND USE:
PUBLIC INPUT:
Subject: Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Long Machine Shop (under construction)
C&H Specialties (under construction)
Opti-Forms, Inc.
Vacant industrial parcel (Mosco-West proposal)
To date the staff has received no public input on this application.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING%STAFFRPT%116PA99 MOSCO East PC.doc
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscaped Area:
Parking/Paved Area:
Lot Coverage:
Floor Area Ratio:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
55,756 sq.
22,200 sq.
13,200 sq.
21,836 sq.
ft. (1.28 acres)
ft. (40% of site)
ft. (24% of site)
ft. (39% of site)
20,700 sq. ~. (37% of site)
22,200 sq., ft. (0.40 FAR)
40 spaces, plus 1 motorcycle & 4 bicycle spaces
38 spaces, plus 2 motorcycle & 6 bicycle spaces *
26 ~. max.(single level with potential future mezzanine)
The Development Code allows a credit against automobile parking spaces for providing
extra motorcycle and bicycle parking spaces.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal involves the design and construction of a 22,200 square foot industrial building on
1.28 acres located on the east side of Colt Court, one parcel south of Winchester Road. The 24-26
foot high structure will contain 20,700 square feet on the first level and 1,500 square feet of
potential additional office space in a second-level mezzanine. The addition of the t,nezzanine would
not effect the exterior of the building.
The project - which we have termed Mosco-East to distinguish it from the companion Mosco-West
proposal on the opposite side of Colt Court - meets or exceeds all of the basic standards called
for in the Development Code, including those for building setbacks, building height, lot coverage,
FAR, required parking and landscape percentage.
BACKGROUND
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant on January 14, 1999. The format application
was submitted on March 24, 1999, and the Design Review Committee reviewed the plans on April
15, 1999. Several subsequent meetings were held with the applicant and the project was deemed
complete on July 13, 1999.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
Colt Court is a short cul-de-sac providing access to six light industria1 parcels. The subject parcel
sits directly to the south of the Long Machine Shop building which is nearing completion at the
southeast corner of Colt and Winchester. The C&H Specialties building is under construction on
two parcels at the south end of the cul-de-sac, and the Burkey Machine & Tool Company building
has been approved for the parcel at the southwest corner of Colt Court and Winchester Road. The
Opti-Forms building is located directly to the east at the southwest corner of Winchester Road and
Calle Empleado.
The approval of this project, along with the approval of the companion Mosco-West proposal, would
complete the Planning Commission's consideration and approval of development plans for all of
the Colt Court parcels.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc 2
ANALYSIS
Site Deskin
The building extends along the length of the northerly property line with a single driveway off Colt
Court providing access to single-loaded parking spaces distributed along the southerly and easterly
property lines. Loading is provided for at a truck well at the rear of the structure and on the south
side of the building at a point where the parcel widens enough to accommodate that activity without
interfering with circulation or parking. An employee patio area protected by an overhead lattice
cover and surrounded by landscaping is shown at the rear, northeasterly portion of the property
overlooking the Valley.
The site design is largely dictated by the constraints of this parcel's rather difficult, long and narrow
shape. The parcel is not only long in relation to its width, but it is also somewhat pie-shaped and
has an irregular rear property line. In order to achieve the building intensity provided for and
allowed under the Code, the building must essentially be situated on the property as it is proposed
here. The challenge comes in treating the structure and elevations in a manner to minimize the
limitations imposed by the shape of the site.
Architecture
The 24-26 foot-high building is of standard tilt-up concrete construction consistent with the vast
majority of other structures in the area. Only 60 feet wide in the front, the building extends out to
100 feet wide as the width of the pamel increases. Two major 45° 30 foot-wide "cut-offs" have been
provided at the corners of the wider portion of the building's southerly elevation in order to add
visual interest, as well as to provide additional room for landscaping and circulation. The main
building entry facing Colt Court is articulated and highlighted with two horizontal rows of windows
and a 3 foot deep recess extending 10 feet high by 16 feet wide in the central section of the front
facade.
All four building walls feature four horizontal reveals: two upper reveals measuring 5.5 inches wide
by 3/. inches deep, and two lower reveals measuring 1.5 inches wide by ~ inches deep. The top,
middle and bottom horizontal "bands" created by the reveals will be smooth concrete, whereas the
two intervening bands will be textured sandblasted concrete along the entire westerly and northerly
elevations and for the first 80 feet of the southerly elevation (to include the entire front "cut-off').
The upper band on the easterly (or rear) elevation will be sandblasted as well. The upper
sandblasted band will also contain spandrel glass windows on higher wall sections interspersed
along the northerly elevation and on the forward portion of the southerly elevation. Higher wall
sections without glass have also been used at two locations on the rear, easterly elevation.
The enhancements and articulation to the easterly (rear) and northerly (zero lot-line) elevations are
in recognition that the views of both of these building elevations are greater than what you would
expect on a fiat-land industrial parcel of normal shape. As noted above, the northerly or zero lot-line
elevation directly abuts the Long Machine Shop parking lot and will therefore be visible to some
degree from Colt Court. The upper portion of the easterly or rear elevation is located over the top
of a slope and will thus be visible from areas to the east, including portions of Winchester Road and
Calle Empleado. The use of higher wall sections to articulate the roofline, along with horizontal
reveals, sandblasted concrete and spandrel glass will enhance the view of these elevations.
The basic color scheme consists of the predominant "antique white" color of the smooth, painted
concrete wall surfaces, and the "natural grey" color of the sandblasted horizontal bands. The glass
\\TEMEC_FSI01\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc 3
will be a blue "azurelite" color with supporting "grey" anodized aluminum frames. For accent, each
of the four horizontal reveals will be painted inside with a dark "sherwood" green color. (Note: A
condition of approval requires the applicant to secure a maintenance easement over the proper~y
to the north of sufficient width to maintain the northerly, zero lot-line building wall).
Landscapina
Due to the curve of the Colt Court cul-de-sac and resulting shape of the front lot line, the
landscaping in the front setback area will vary in depth from the required minimum of 20 feet, up
to almost 43 feet. Included within the front setback area will be landscaped mounds to a height of
2-3 feet. Landscaping also extends back along the south side of the building for 80 feet, beyond
the forward cut-off to the secondary loading doors. A landscape strip extends the full length of the
southerly property line, generally providing a clear width of 7 feet rather than the minimum 5 feet
required by Code. Other areas of landscaping are at the rear of the property, which include large
concentrations at both corners connected by a 12-foot wide strip along the rear property line.
The landscape plan also shows the planting areas proposed on adjoining developments to the
south and north. The landscape strip that adjoins the southerly property line will result in a
combined width of landscaping averaging 12 feet along this common boundary. On the northerly
side, a 5 foot wide landscape strip with four larger landscape planters - one at each end, and two
spaced at regular intervals in the middle - will help to enhance and soften this elevation of the
building.
All of the landscaped areas are planted with trees, shrubs and ground covers consistent with City
standards and the comments from our Landscape Architect.
Traffic Analysis
The Public Works Department has reviewed and calculated the expected traffic impacts associated
with this project. It has been concluded that the daily trips generated will not exceed what was
anticipated by the General Plan Circulation Element for this site given that the project's Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) is equal to what was anticipated under the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
To address the impacts associated with increased traffic on Winchester Road and at the
intersection of Winchester and Diaz Road, the applicant will be required to pay traffic signal
mitigation fees and development impact fees as conditions of approval for the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
It is anticipated that a Notice of Exemption will be filed for Planning Application N6. PA99-0116 per
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332.
Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that are: less than five (5) acres and
substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services.
The site meets all of the criteria for in-fill development, and therefore the project is eligible for a
CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~I 16PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
4
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project is consistent with the (BP) Business Park land use designation and the (LI) Light
Industrial zone applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
Upon approval of the Development Plan as conditioned, the project will meet all of the standards
and guidelines for industrial development prescribed by the Development Code and Design
Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. and compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development. We are
therefore recommending approval based on the following findings:
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (BP)
Business Park development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for
(Ll) Light Industrial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and
density of industrial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent
with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building
codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are
no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site.
Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger
industrial park. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on
wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Coide.
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTH16PA99 MOSCO East PC.dOC
5
Attachments
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Exhibits - Blue Page 19
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E, Grading Plan
F. Elevations
G. Floor Plans
H. Landscape Plan
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~I16PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'~116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
7
ATTACHMENT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0116, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 22,200 SQUARE FOOT
BUILDING ON 1.28 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
COLT COURT SOUTH OF WINCHESTER AND KNOWN AS
PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 28471-1
WHEREAS, Don Mosco filed Planning Application No. PA99-0116, in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99~0116 was processed, including but not limited
to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0116 on
August 4, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0116.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0116 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (BP)
Business Park development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for (LI) Light
Industrial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly
planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of industrial
development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
\\TEMEC_FS101WOLl\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT%116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc 8
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Cede.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been adopted for
Planning Application No. PA99-0116 per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15332. This Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain
prescribed criteria. The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can
be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0116 (Development Plan) for the design,
construction and operation of a 22,200 square foot building on 1.28 acres located on the east side
of Colt Court south of Winchester Road, and known as Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 28471-1, subject
to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 4th day of August, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of August,
1999, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~116PA99 Mosco East PC+doc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA99-0116 - Development Plan
Project Description:
Construct and operate a 22,200 square foot industrial
building on a 1.28 acre light industrial parcel
DIF Category:
Business Park/Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
909-360-002
August 4, 1999
August 4, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of this condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4c).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
\\TEMEC_FS101 %VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTH 16PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
11
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Floor Plans), and H (Landscape Plan),
contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer
or any successors in interest.
All roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest
level of the surrounding parapet wall.
The open lattice cover proposed over the employee patio area shall be designed and
architecturally treated to complement the design of the building.
The trash enclosure at the rear of the site shall be architecturally treated to complement and
blend with the design of the building.
All landscape planters shall maintain a minimum clear inside dimension of five (5) feet. All
planters adjacent to parking spaces shall be provided with a 12 "wide step-out the length
of the planter (total width 18").
10. All compact parking spaces will be marked for "COMPACT CARS ONLY."
11.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to thdse noted directly
below and with Exhibit 'T' (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall:
Reveals:
Glass:
Anodized aluminum:
Vista Paint # 50 "Antique White"
Vista Paint # 46 "Sherwood Green"
Azurelite Blue
Aluminum Grey
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
12.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
13.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
14. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H and I", (Site Plan, Grading Plan,
Elevations, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final
conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department -
Planning Division staff, and shall submit five (5) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1"
ATEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R116PA99 MOScO East PC.dOC
copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of
approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved
Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
15. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
16.
Throe (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions.
The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants sh~ll be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped aroa for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
17.
A maintenance easement shall be secured and rocorded over the northerly adjacent
property of sufficient width to maintain the subject property's northerly building wall.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
18.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. A
separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits
"D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions.
19.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
20.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the landscape plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that
year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition
satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
21. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed refiectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel. beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centerod at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
\~TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
22.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
23.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
24.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
25.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
26.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
27.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
28.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
29.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~I16PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
14
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
30.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make
required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
31.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
32.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
33
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
34.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
35.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over AC.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
36.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%116PA99 Mosco East PC,doc
15
37.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
38.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
39.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
40.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
41.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 Edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1996 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
42.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
43.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for
a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type,
or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The
Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as -provided. (CFC
903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent
public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than
250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a
hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix Ill-B)
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3,
901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
%\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
17
53.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
54.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC
Article 10)
55.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (CFC 902.4)
56.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4
57.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piNed combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
58.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developedapplicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from
both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
OTHER AGENCIES
59.
The project also must comply with the requirements of all other agencies having jurisdiction
over the project, including but not limited to the requirements noted in the attached
correspondence from the Rancho California Water District dated March 31, 1999, the
County Department of Environmental Health dated April 1, 1999, and the Riverside County
Flood Control District dated April 8, 1999
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
G:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
lVat r
March 31, 1999
Steve Griffin, Case Planner
City of Ternecula
Plannin9 Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
' PARCEL NO. 2 OF PAP. CEL MAP NO. 28471-1
APN 909-360-002
PANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0116
Dear Mr. Griffin:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and
sewer service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
SIeve Brannon, P.E
Development Engineering Manager
99\SB:mc083%F012-TS~FCF
c: Laurie Willjams, Engineering Services Supervisor
TO:
FROM:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIt;
MEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: April l, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPA.RTMENT
· 5,~e nm
C ON, Environmental Health Specialist Ill
PLOT PLAN NO. PA99-0116
The Depatttnent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA99-01 I6 and has no
objections. Sanitary, sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO A.'N"Y PLAN CHECK SUB~IITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a)
b)
c)
"Will-serve" letters fi'om the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submit'ted, including a fix'cure
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022.
A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Undergound storage tanks, Ordinance ~=6 17.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance ,'-=.615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: ,Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Enviromnental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson ;,,~_~ -? ] ]
s~zmd3b.doc
.General :vlanager-Chid En~ln¢=r
RIVERS/DE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AN'D WATER CONSERVATION' DISTRICT
City of Temecuia
Piannin Deoanment
Post O~ce Box 9033
Temecula. California g258g-g033
Attention: ~'f F--VF, ~ ~,l FF'f hJ
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Dismot does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in inco~oraled
cities. The Dis~Rct also does no~ ~lan ¢bec~ ci~ land use cases or provide S~a~e Oiwsion o~ Real Bs~a[e le~ers or
o~er flood hazard reports ~or such cases. D $~Rct cemmemslrecommenaa~ians ~or such cases are normally limited
~o i~ems of specific m~erest ~o ~be Oist~ including D s~ct Mas~er Drainage P~an facil ties o[ber re
contro and draina e facilities which caul~ be considered a logical comichen[ or e~ension of ~ master ~n s stem,
and D~smc: Area 8rainage P~an fees (development mitigation fees), Ih aa~ition, info~ation of a general nature
3roviaed,
The District has no~ reviewed [he proposed project in detail and the loftowing checked comments do no[ in any way
constitute or imply Ois~ct approval or en~orsemem of the proposed projec~ with respect to flood hazard pub c
health and safe~ or any other suc~ issue:
~ / This project would no~ De impacted by Dist~ct Mas~er Drainage Plan facilities nor are ether ~aciiities
regional ~nterest proposed.
This project involves Distd~ Master Plan facilities, The Dist~ct witl accept ownership of such facilities on
wd~en request of the Ci~. Facili~es must be cons~cted ~o District s~andards and D stdct plan cnecx and
inspe~ on ~ [ be requ red for D std¢ aceprance Plan check inspection an~ adminjstm~ ve fees will
required. ' '
This proje~ proposes channels sto~ drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature ahwor ~ Io i~l e~ension of the adopted '
Master Drainage Plan. The Dist~c~ woul8 consider accepting ownership Or such racmaes on wn~e equest
of ~e Ci~. Facilities must ~e cans~ed to Dis~dct standards, and District plan check and inspection will
be required for Oist~ct acceptance. Plan ch~k, inspe~on and administrative fees ~11 be required? r
.,,..., .... ,,,,. ,.,. ,. ,. ,.,, .... ,.., .. ,.,. ,....., .. ,..
permiL
This project may m~uire a National Pollutam Discharge Bimina~ion System (NPDBS permit ~rom the S~ate Water
Resourc8~ Co~[rol 8card. ClearaRce f~r g~sding. recordstion, o~ o~her final 8pprov82should
C~ has ~e~ermme~ ~ha~ ~he pro~ec~ has been grained a permit or is shown ~o be ex~mpL
~ ~i= pm ¢c~ ic,4¢lve= e F~cr=l ~mergc~¢y Mans~mo~: A~ncy (F~MA ms=pod flood pi8~n ~hen
require the appticsa~ to provide all studies, caicut8~ions, piano and tuber ~n~o~a~ien required to mee~ FEMA
requirements, and shou~d ~u~her require t~a~ the 8pplican~ ¢btai~ a Co~di~ionai Le~er o~ Map Revision CLOMR)
amor o grading mcordat~on or o~ber find 8pprova d be pro~ed, a~d a Le~er ~ Mae Revision (LOMRS pnor
occupancy.
ff a natural watercourse cr mapped flood plato is ~m~8cted ~y ~bis pro~ecL the Cjb/s~ould require the acel~cap~
obtain a Sec~o~ 1801/1~03 Agreemere from ~be CajiZomia Depa~men~ ~ Fish and Game and a C~ean Water Act
4 ,
Sec~o~ 4Q Petit ~rom the U,S. A~my Corns ~ Engineers or 'N~en co~8spondence
jndicaCjng the oro oct is exempt from ~hese requiremores. A Clean t "
pemzt.
',leo,/~ruly yours,
~U,~RT E. MCKIBB/N
Senior Civd F. ngineer
Date: '~ -~
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~116PA99 Mosco East PC.doc
19
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0116
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
VICINITY MAP
R:\Griffins\l 16PA99,Mosco East Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP BUSINESS PARK
CASE NO. - PA99-0116
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
R:%Griffins~116PA99.Mosco East Staff Report.c~oc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0116
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
SITE PLAN
R :\Grif~ns\l 16PA99.MOSCO East Staff Report.doe
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA99-0116
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
GRADING PLAN
R:%Griffins\l 16PA99. Mosco East Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0116
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
ELEVATIONS
R:\Grif~ns\l 16PA99.MOSCO East Staff Report,doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
!i
CASE NO. - PA99-0116
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
FLOOR PLAN
R:~Griffins\l 16PA99,Mosco East Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA99-0116
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 4, 1999
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:%Griffins\l 16PA99.Mosco East Staff ReporLdoc