The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About121599 PC AgendaTEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 15, 1999 (~ 9.~0 PM 43200 Business I~rk Drive Council Chambers Temecula, CA 92590 Resolution Next In Order ~9-054 CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE: ROLL CALL: Chaiq>erson Guerrtem Fahey, Guerdem, Mathewson, and Webster PUBUC COMMENTS A total of 15 man utes is provided so membsm of the public ~an address the Gommissicnem on items that am not listed on the Agenda. Speakers am limited to three (3) minutes satin. if you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Seuetary. When you are called to speak, please some forward and date yourname and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the R~ning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. Them is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakera. COMMISSION BUSINESS Approval d Agends Director's Hearing Update Cdterie for Determining Public Convenience or Necessity Finding for Alcohol Sewing Uses PUBUC HEARING ITEMS 4. Case No: Applicant Location: Proposal: Environmental Adjon: Plannor. Recommendation: Pinning Application No. PA99-0378 (Development Plan and Conditional Use Perutit) Saturn Corporation East side of Ynez Road, south of Selana Way (Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809) To design, ~onslmct and operate a 12, 825 square foot Saturn autornobie dealership with associated automobile display and storage areas on 2.61 acres planned and Zoned for SC Service Commemial use Exempt Steve Griffin Approval Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental A~tion: Project Planner. Reoommendation: Planning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) VCL Construction East side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho Califomia Road (portions of Parcels 1, 2, 3 & 6 of Parcel Map 23882) Construct a 137-morn, 59,950 square foot, 3-story Hdiday Inn Express Hotel on 3.37 acres planned and zoned for HT Highway/Tourist corninertial use Exempt Steve Griffin Approval 6. Case No: Applicant' Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner. Recommendation: PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) Illusionzone, inc., Chuck Lacy 42188 Rio Nedo, Suite. A The operation of an indoor Skateboard Park with optional use as a Paintball Arena occupying 14,666 square feet of a 26,161 square foot industrial building. This project is Categorically Exempt f~om furl. her evaluation under CEQA Section 15301 (Existing Facilities). Thomas Thomsley Approval APPEAL FROM DIRECTOR'S HEARING Januap/5, 2000, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California, 92590 ITEM #2 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager December 15, 1999 Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for November, 1999: Date Case No. November 4, PA99-0255 1999 November 18, PA99-0348 1999 November 24, PA99-0271 1999 November 24, PA99-0438 1999 Proposal To establish a new and used RV, truck and automobile sales and rental facility at the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Las Haciendas Street Subdivides 3.87 vacant acres into three parcels within Planning Area 4 of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan Build and operate a 9,983 square foot medical office complex located at 41715 Winchester Road Operate a motorcycle sales, service and assembly business in an existing 15,950 square foot industrial building at 42265 Winchester Road Attachments: 1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 3 Applicant Action Temecula Valley Approved RV Jay Kerner, KMI Real Estate Approved David E. Smith, Approved DDS Temecula Motor Approved Sports F:\DEPTS\PLANN1NG\DIP, HEAR\MEMO\1999\November 1999.memo.doe 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ACTION AGENDAS F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\DIP, HEAR\MEMO\1999\Novemb~r 1999.memo.doe 2 ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1999 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Matthew Fagan, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner: Case Engineer: Recommendation: PA99-0255 (Conditional Use Permit) Temecula Valley RV, LLC 27941 Jefferson Avenue Conditional use permit to establish a new and used RV, truck and automobile sales and rental facility on 2.5 acres at the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Las Haciendas Street Exempt per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines Steve Griff'm, AICP John Pourkazemi Approval ACTION: APPROVED ADJOURNMENT \\TEMEC_FSI01\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNING\DIRHEAR\I999\i1-4-99.AGENDA.doc ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 1999 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Matthew Fagan, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the pubhc can address to the Senior Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: EnvironmentalAction: Case Planner: Case Engineer: Recommendation: Planning Application Number: PA99-0348 (Tentative Parcel Map Number 29470) Jay Kemer, K.M.I Real Estate Parmers IX, LLC Southeasterly of the intersection of Margarita and Winchester Roads. Request to subdivide 3.87 vacant acres into 3 parcels zoned for commercial development within Planning Area 4 of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan (Specific Plan Number 1). The subject site has been reviewed for adverse environmental impacts under Environmental Impact Report Number 348 and subsequent addendure number 4 which was adopted by the Temecula City Council. Denice Thomas Annie Bostre-Le Approval ACTION: APPROVED ADJOURNMENT F:\USEILoUBL~PLANNING\DIRHEAR\I999\ll,18.99.AGEI~/DA.d~x: ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 1999 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Matthew Fagan, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Planning Application No. PA99-0271 (Development Plan) Applicant: David E. Smith, DDS of Winchester-Rodpaugh Condo Development, G.P. 41715 Winchester Rd., #203, Temecula, CA 92590 Location: In the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center south of Roripaugh Road and west of Winchester Road. Proposal: Planning Application No. PA99-0271 is a proposal to build and operate a 9,983 square medical office complex designed with four separate suites. Environmental Action: This project is a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA (Section Number 15332 In-fill Development Projects on sites under five acres in an urbanized area.) Case Planner: Thomas Thomsley, Project Planner Recommendation: Approval ACTION: APPROVED F:\USERPUBL\PLANNING~DIRHEAR\I999\I1-24-99.AGENDA,do~ 2. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner: Case Engineer: Recommendation: ACTION: ADJOURNMENT Planning Application Number. PA99-0438 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) Temecula Motor Spods 42265 Winchester Road, on the Nodh side of Winchester Road east, of Calle Empleado, west of Diaz Road Request to operate a motorcycle sales, service, and assembly business in an existing 15,950 square foot industrial building zoned for business park (BP) use. The project is proposed for an existing facility and is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Categorical Exemption 15301. Denice Thomas Jerry Alegria Approval APPROVED F:\USERPUBL\PLANNING~DIR. HEAR\I999\I 1-24*99.AGENDA.doc 2 ITEM #3 CITY OF TEMCULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commis 'on Debbie Ubnosku,~Pl~g Manager December 15, 1999 Criteria for Determining Public Convenience or Necessity Finding for Alcohol Serving Uses Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission: REVIEW the City-Wide Alcoholic Beverage License Map (prepared based on information provided by Alcoholic Beverage Control, dated October 4, 1999); and m PROVIDE DIRECTION to staff on how to establish boundaries within the City for determining areas of potential over-concentration of existing alcohol licenses for purposes of making Public Convenience or Necessity Findings for future alcohol licenses. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission has requested that staff revisit the existing Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) Finding Criteria. The Commission has expressed their concern with the degree of subjectivity required for the PCN determination. In addition, the Commission has expressed concerns regarding the City-wide over- concentration of licenses as determined by California Alcoholic Beverage Control and the specific areas in the City where the over-concentration is occurring. ANALYSIS In an effort to clearly illustrate the location of existing facilities which serve alcohol within the City, staff contacted California Alcoholic Beverage Control and acquired a list of all off-sale (stores, etc.) and on-sale (restaurants, bars, fraternal clubs) within the City (listed by Census Tract). This list is included as Attachment No. 1. Staff then plotted these licenses on the City-Wide Alcoholic Beverage License Map (to be provided under separate cover). \\TEMEC_FSI01\VOLI\DEPTSXPLANN1NG~STAFFRPTXPCN CR1TEKIA.doc From a cursory inspection of this map, it becomes apparent that the existing licenses are concentrated in the commercial centers within the City along the following streets: · Old Town · South Old Town Front Street (Southside Specific Plan Area) · Jefferson Avenue · Ynez Road · Winchester Road/Mall · Rancho California Road · SR79 South Staff is requesting the Planning Commission review the City-Wide Alcoholic Beverage License Map and provide direction on how to establish boundaries within the City for determining areas of potential over-concentration of existing alcohol licenses for purposes of making Public Convenience or Necessity Findings for future alcohol licenses. Attachments: List from California Alcoholic Beverage Control - Blue Page 3 Existing PCN Findings - Blue Page 4 City-Wide Alcoholic Beverage License Map (Under Separate Cover) \\TEMEC_FS l 0 1WOL I \DEPTS~PLANNINGXSTAFFRPTXPCN CRITERIA .doc 2 ~Nmd~/OCtobs~ ~, 1999 9:50m -- PWe Zl -: !~ i: 243603 . '}a36oa · 0a32.34 41. ~ : 350737 I · - .Z' :sSs 2~ 0~32. i( '4lrl ~32. +4.2~~ ' 339A49 i 112879 ~ 34e~7 *. .{ Tes~cu432 -04 27465 .dae~asa~ON AV~ T!me~_~A CA 92390 pRBSTI~ STATIO~qS 44239 MARGARIT&RD CA 92590 KIMIiM3NG S 3?885 HWY 79 ~ TEMBCUI~ CA 92592 EIMDO~GS 3~985 RWV '79 ~.31/FT~ ~ R T~uuA CA 92592 RDHKVENTURES E-PSHIP 45100 REDHAWK PKWY CA 92390 pn~Tg~GADFv'EIaPM]~iTCORPORATION 45000 PALARDA TEMEC~LA CA 92592 pECHANGADB~ELOPMENTCORPOFa~TIC~ 45000 PALARD T~4ECULA CA 92592 ABRAHIMMIC}RF~MANSOUR 44260 APIS RD CA 92592 HA~SC~ GLORIA 28676 FRONT ST CA 92590 STUKI]~R~ JOHN A 28693 FRO!~ ~T T~CU~A CA 92590 ~TA-x-~a~ BRC)~ MARKETS 27475 J~PFEP~ON ~T TEMECULA CA 92590 92590 Y N N N Y N Y N Y N N Y N Y N N N N N N N N N lq Y N Y iN N N N N Y N N iN N Y N iN Y N Y N N N }r_-~-~ 0cteier/,, 1999 9:h -- pm~e 31 OCT-B4-1~-;j o 32. 33~5~38 )4 41;:. 15 563 0432. )4 47.. .17~45 o432.)4.52 '18~057 qi32. )4 47i '30GV31 C~fl32.04 19 40 :' 31~257 ~32. )4 209 96 32. )4'41~ ~ I ~ 212820 : . ~t32.34 '~?~ - Te~ecu432-04 27780 FRGi~T 9T 9TR 1 TmmL-~rbA CA 9259'0 28915 EANC~O CAEIFO~NIA RD TI~K'0LA CA MEXICO CHIQS'~TO INC 41841 MOR~qO RD T~'tFIA 92590 '.rFW POST 4089 29000 pOJOr. ST · CA 92590 CA 92390 RB~3~CY PROP~TIF~ L-PS~IP 44501 ~ CAN~ON RD TEMECULA CA NANDERSCHEID DONALD L 28551 RANCHO CALIFOPaqIA RD TEiiI~I3T, A CA 92592 QORAAN JUDI 27911 FRCNT ST STR 109 TEMECULA 92590 CA 92590 Y N N N Y N N N Y N N N Y' N N N Y N N N N N Y N PRESTIGE STATIONS INC N N Y N 41555 WZNC~ESTER RD TEMECULA CA 92590 STJO~N COSTAS Y ~ N N 28690 FRONT ST STE 500 T~M~'~LA CA 92590 CIPr'r-~ R STORE,q INC 28410 FRO!IT ST 100 T~/~CDLA CA 92590 92590 'TEXA~ LILS CORPORATI~ 28495 FRONT ST STES B & C TmM~/OLA CA 92590 SEAKFaPEA935 PUB & GRILLE 2?645 u~='r=4~SON AVE 116 ~ CA N' N Y N Y N N N Y N N N PARK IN S~IK N N Y N 44564 PALA RD IK~--~-f Octeber 4, lee9 9:5M -- Psee 41 rrT-e4-19~,~ le:~n F'ROH · ' 0432. ' ~ %* 315.259 :.: ! i: : ,, d132.p4 2o! 4 I 3 23¢9 21- i* 34~5~4 ~ q432.p4 21i i ~ % 223615 35.65 ' 228687 432, 4 4!~[ I ' Q432.b4 2Z~: : ': 325Y99 * ~ ',: ~ .': '.* I j ! ¢ Temecu432 QUR~JI,IDI 27911 ~ ST STE 109A CA 92592 CA 92590 MATAB 41925 MOTORCAR P~eY ~TE a & B TEMECULA CA MATAB INC 41925 MOTORCAR Prd~Y STE A & B 92591 TEMECULA CA 92591 92591 ALBERTSONS INC 29530 RANCHQ CA/,IFO~/4/A RD TENECD~A CA SAV MAX FOODS INC 29530 RANCEO CALIFORNIA RD T~g~'U~A CA 92591 REYES JESSE JOSE 27713 JEFFerSON AVE 181 T[MECULA CA 92590 NASSER G~aA~I 27315 a~'EEPaON AVE STE E TD(ECULA CA BHULEAR KARAMBIR SINGH 44535 BEDFORD CT G RANCHO CALIFORNIA BROTHERTON !~RD."T D 27535 u~rrt~SO!t AVE Tm4ECUT.,A 92590 CA 92592 CA 92590 LUCKY STOREG INC DELAWARE 29610 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD T~I~C13LA CA 92591 ALBERTSONS 29610 RPaCHO CALIFORNIA RD TEHECU~A ca '~ J RESTAURANT GROUP 27315 u~-r'ea~SC~ AVE A T~V/ECDLA 92591 CA 92590 Y N N 14 N N Y N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N Y N Y N N Y N N Y Y N Y N N N N N Y 1999 9:h -- pige SI i 04. l!i .. 'resec~432 -04 ~4ORS ~I~I~RZSES 28250 FRClqT ST CA 92590 ~ WBST m~-rE. fv, PP.X&'Fa INC 41925 ~R CAR PKWY ST~ G ~ CA 92591 BURK JOm~ BV~RETT 27717 JEFFERSON ST T~MECULA CA 92590 LOVEI~ JACQUELINE 27644 YNB~ RD M~ T~NIL"OT.~ CA 92591 NIHON INCORPORA-r"/'' 27576 ~ l:u:)HIS 92591 BAILY CHRISTOPHER J 27644 YNEZ RD STE Mll TRM~-ClTLa CA 92591 BFaCCNE~ONGE INC 27725 d~RSO~ AVE STR 101 T~L'~I.A CA 92590 LUCKY STORES INC DELAk~,RE 30530 RLNCHO CALIFORNIA RD T~Z~CULA CA 92591 ~T,,BaI'rrSONS INC 30530 RANCRO CALIFORN'IA RD ",naw'~CUI,~ CA 92591 GHCtLIZADEH MASS~3D 27464 ,J'~-Fh~c_qON AVE T~MECULA C~ 92590 laN~6 DR~G STORES CALIFOi~ZA 3064,0 RANCNO CALIFORNIA RD T!~'IK'Xr',,A CA 92591 STADIL~! PIZZA INC 27314 JI~TTERSON ST STB 1-3 T~uA CA 92590 H$IAO MCMUNG Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N N N Y N Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N Y N N Y N N N N N 1999 HOW -- PC* 61 : .i 32.4 471 ' !: I -335308 :.' i :: !~ · -: ! - !. - ! - .., · ' :! :30i,~89 . .:~ , ~ · ;; '. .:.. :; '" !~ ' :1 d~32,04'~GI! ': ;~ " : i; I . : 2~02 { . 0432 04 1~ i* I.:RI3H I} Te~ecu432-04 27371 J~'~KSON AV~ ST8 V & W T~'d~A CA 92590 DY~ GOLF S~RV'~CES 41687 ~ DR TEMECULA CA 92390 Y NFaBTTT PARTN!~RS T~'u'LA%~WTUREL Y 29345 RANC~O CA~IFOm~IA RD TBM~COLA CA 92591 W~LLIANSONGTLDA DEC~2~DARIO 27911 FRCST ST STE 104 TEM~C~F,A CA 92590 Y USANA.T.;U3Oe:E CHT.,TRE2 T 27451 u~t~RSON AVE T~%~U~A CA 92590 Y Tm~EXLLC 27345 u'F_,F~ AVE TWM~.CU~A CA 92590 Y ,3'dLlfaM,~3E141n~ IlK: 27313 JEFFERSaq AVE B 92590 I.,OPL='ZAND,~L~T~M3LR~us-r INCORPOR N 28950 FRONT ST 101-103 T~BCU~A CA 92390 PAIN~ RONALDKEMI~TON 30590 RANCBO CALIFORNIA RO STE 303C TEMECULA CA 92591 Y SADIK EArN 28322 FRONT ST T~ULA CA 92590 .N T~eECOt, A PrzZA CCIMPANY ZNC 44535 ~n~ORD CT STE D TBMECU~A CA 92592 Y DEMOULIN I~ T 28780 fi%Otr/' ST UNXT A1 CA 92590 N PARs,eztt DANIEL R 29000 FRONT_ ST A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N Y N N N ,v N N N {.crday Otter &, t999 9:50m -- Page 71 0CT-84-1%'~3~,~ 18:27 Temecu432-04 TEMECULA CA 92590 THESING MICHA=r. ALaN 28G36 FRC~qT ST 109 Tia~CULA CA 92590 FEI~qd~DE8 gV/U~Gr~.INE 27645 d,ffi,L'r.P,m~qCi[ AVE STE 106 TDu~ULa CA 92590 pARA(JC~STEAFa. OUSEP_ESTAURANTS 27600 T~ECULA CA 92390 COSTCOWHOLESAZ, E CORPORATION 40440 WINCRJSTERED TD4ECULA CA 92590 NGUfi~NGHZ Tm~m 30680 RANCHO CALIFORNIA M601 & N602 TR~.CULA CA 92591 DAFFKRNFP. EDL 28495 FRONT ST STE A CA 92590 ~r~t'TIUmD INC 29115 FROI~ ST CA 92590 VONS COKPANIE; I~c THE 27481 YNEZ RD T~N~CtTt,A CA 92591 ZARIPHES THEODORE A 27423 u'B;r'r'r4~.ql( ST CA 92590 FOOD 4 v.mcSOp CALIFORNIA 26419 YNEZ RD Ti~CUSA CA 92590 AKSAR~E~I FIZ?~, CORPORATIO~ 26479 YNEZRDC TE2,g, CImA CA 92390 Y N Y N 'Y' N N Y Y N N Y N Y Y N N N N N N N N 6946,4'~ N N N N N N Y N N N bl N Y N Y N N N Y N N N N N {I;~,-~,y 0gteber &, I~9~ 9:5081 -- page 0CT-84-1999 16: ~F + ; :- :, ~: : :~ : : ::. .. ]: 0432 30=998 I ~1, !! !! Temecu432-04 MOT-T'ER ~ 27326 utu'~."glR,.~C~ AVE S'T,E 17 ~ CA 92590 NMIPINC 29760 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~D STE 109 TEMECULA CA 92591 DEPHILIPPIS MICHAEL D 27309 JEFFERSON AVE ETE 110 T~4ECDI~A CA 92590 CE~/M J~MPER T~M~TULA 295A0 RANCHO CALIFOP~qIA RD TH)~CULA CA 92590 WINCHF_aTP.,~ FOODS CORPORATION 26495 YNZZ RP T~O~LA CA 92~90 HURWYN CBRISTINA GItAC~ 29762 Pa~TCHO CALIFOR~TIA RD TEMECULA CA 92591 BACIO LLC 27315 JEFPERSO~ AVE STE K TEX~ECULa CA 92593 TE~SCULA STAMPEDE 28721 FRObaT ST T~CULA CA 92590 BECKMAN jONZ K 41925 T~IRD ST ?~4ECULA CA 92590 GM & M ~r~u~PRISES L-PSHIP 27309 JB~:~-~ AVE STE 101-103 TP~-QUEJ~ CA 92590 PRESTIGE STATIONS 27691 YNEZ RD CA 92591 I(EELI. NG/X)NALD EDWIN 27570 ur..r:r.a,.SON ST CA 92590 CHENG GAILY Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Y Y N N N N N N October ;,,, lg~ 9:SOam -- Page 91 OCT--Oa-~gT3 1.9:26 TO Teaecu432-04 27536 YNET. RD F21-23 CA 92390 COVAERU3IAS ARTEMISAM 28645 FRONT ST TEMEC~.A CA 92593 S & L OIL 26680 YNEZ CA 92591 HEM~TB ZONE NA~u~u%L FOODS LLC 41915 BI3TC~CAR ~ STEA-E T~n~CULA CA 92591 Y N THY~EL DE~_I~A L 28410 PaCeIT ST STE 112-112A T~ECULA CA 92590 N N W3BIOS RBSTAURANTg INCA DT,~WA~E C 27480 YNEZ RD STE 02 T~MBC~A CA 92591 MANDARIN CHINA POOD INC 27725 JEFFBE5(~ S_~l~ 102 103 TE~!~CtruA CA 92590 AR~ B~tI'k~LPRISES INC 27735 YNEZ BLVD T~e~bA CA 92592 N N C~IST~FORAglS MICE~/b 28120 FRONT S~ ~r~ A 101 TI~ECUFA CA 92590 Y N SPIRIT ENTERPRISE5 INC 28903 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD T~MECULA CA 92590 Y N N N Y N N N N N N Y N N N Y N N N Y N N N N N Y N ARTEA~A BEANCA CERVANTES Y N N N ~27548 YNE~ RD 1-13 ]T~NBCULA CA 92591 i ~ DUNN LYNDEN K Y N N N !27470 JEFFBRSC~ AVE STE 2 & 3 ~TEM~CU~A CA 92590 ~TCB INC 29105 FRONT ST CA 92592 Y N N N ~cu432-04 Ng3UY'm~THUAN 27533 JEFFERSON AVE TEN]~CULA CA 92590 S & C COMP,U,Rr INC 29375 RANC~O CALIF~P, NIA &D '?m,,mCULA C,A 92590 BAJALOB~-A'~GROUPOFT~4ECULA INC 27511 ~ RD E1 ~ CA 92591 TEXACO~EFXNING~A~)MARr, EA'/I~G XNC 29750 RA~CHO CALIFORNIA RD T~I'ULA CA 92390 C~rEVRC~ STATICS ZNQ 31669 HWY 79 SOUTH T~CULA CA 92592 ALB~RT~3~ 31813 m~Y 79 SOUT~ TE~C'Va, A CA 92591 gTATEREROSMAEv~TS 31813 P~Pf 79 SOUT~ TE~4ECUGA CA 92591 THRIFTY PAYLESS INC 31797 HWY 79 S0~i~ · TE~SCULA CA 92591 : B~R3IE~3~ B~/~RpRISES LLC ! TB~ECULA CA 92592 : T~)~ECIW~A FISH HOUSE INC 26700 Yb~Z 9D CA 92120 DOOL F. EF~RD r. 28464 FR0~T ST TED~EC~aA CA 92590 Y N Y N Y N N N N Y 31940 HWY 79 SOUTH ,~'A'~ Cl TE~a~'~,A CA 92592 Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y ~ Y N Y N N Y Y N Y N N N l,i' N N N P. 10 q octdec &, 1'~9 9:SOul -- Page 11l 16:29 FT~H i: !. temecu432-04 M O M ~21TERPILYb~:S 'rNC 28822 FROtrr ST ONTT 203 & 204 SCAII, CTff-T~ JOSgPH x 27525 I'NSZ I~ STADIUM PIZZA RED~AWK LLC 31950 ~Y 79 S STE B1 T~MEC~3LA CA LCr. BITk-r~PRISES z.I~C 27476 I'NEZ KD N1 TEMECULA K & '~ ~qTERpRISES LLC 29363 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TEMECULA CA FLYING MARLIN ENTERPRISES LLC 2~495-97 YNEZ RD A1-A2 TEHECULA CA BHANI3AL pARAMJIT SINGH 27715 JBe'~-~SON AVE 106 TBHK'ULA T~r~r. KNATIORAL EATERIES 27520 YNEZ RD C1 TEHECULA CAMPINX DONALD ROBERT 28860 FR(XIT ST UNIT A1 j TI~4ECULA CA MAIN ST CALIFORNIA INC W]34CHESTER RD & _vNEZ RD SBC T~IECtILA CA Fiv.I E~-re~aeRISES INC 40820 WINCHESTER RD STE 1020 26820 JEFFEESC~ AVE Y 92590 Y 92591 Y 92592 92591 Y 92591 Y 92591 Y 92590 N 92591 Y 92590 N 92591 92591 Y 92562 N N N N N N N Y N Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P.11 /0¸ TO ?ssn~-m432-03 KURC~YNSI(/S~EIEA M 33350 IA S~R[JqA WAY T~MECULA 92591 CA 92591 Y mmr~w~raZ~ CYNTHIA PAULETTE 37641 B BENTON TB24ECOLA CA 92592 N N Y N N N Y N N N WZLSON C~ WINERY & VINEYARDS ~LC H N N Y 35960 ~0 ~I~IA ~ ~ ~ 92591 ~T~ J~ F N N Y N ~ ~ 92592 It P. 12 694r=4'T~ P. 13 RP 04 6_ADDR 1 Primary Name On (~. Off Prem/se Adclress Act ~en Act Peru BACA~n-rA ~A ANN N N Y H 41125 WI~"r~ RD STE A-3 ~ CA 92591 CHEVI~ STATIONS INC N N Y N 40635 Wl'NCHESTER 'RD TID!~CULA CA 92390 W--~.TSONS INC N -~ N Y 'I'~!BCUf~-W. CA 92589 CA 92591 N H Y N RALPI~ GROOm? COMPANY 40355 TflECHF. SwI'RR RD TEMECUT, A CA 92591 Y N N N SWH CORPORATION 40705 HINCrlF, aTER RD TEimCULA 92591 Y N N N NANCI LISA DIANE 40335 Wl31I~b-rP21 RD STE J & K qe~iRCOLA CA 92591 N N Y N TRADER JOFa COMPANY 40665 WINCHESTER RD 4-5-6 ?I~41L"OLA CA 92592 N N Y N {LUCKY 5'TO RP. S INC DElaUOa~E 31960 HWY 79 Tm~K'~T~A CA iOi~L. P. 13 PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY MAKING FINDINGS FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY Criteria to Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity YES 1. YES 2. YES 3. YES 4. YES 5. YES 6. Does the proposed establishment have any unique features which are not found in other similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other special services)? Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a different socio-economic class)? Does the proposed establishment provide entertainment that would fill a niche in the community (i.e. a comedy club, jazz club, etc.) Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other establishments in the area? Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e. freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other establishments? Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of population during certain seasonal periods? Criteria to Not Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity NO 1. Is there are proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the proposed establishment? NO 2A. Are there any sensitive uses (i.e. schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity (600 feet) to the proposed establishment? NO 2B. Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses? NO 3. Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by the residents of the area? NO 4. Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area? Vicinity Map with a 1/4 mile radius Number of similar uses within the City Inventory (listing) of other off-site buinessses within 1 mile and 3 miles Notice Requirements R:~FOP2viS'u~.LCOHOL,CRT I 1/3/99 dwh ITEM #4 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 15, 1999 Planning Application No. PA99-0378 (Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit) Case Planner: Steve Griffin, AICP RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No, 99- approving Planning Application No, PA99-0378 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, and ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99- 0378 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. APPLICATION INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Saturn of Temecula APPLICANT: Saturn Corporation REPRESENTATIVE: Darrold Davis PROPOSAL: The design, construction and operation of a 12,825 square foot Saturn automobile dealership on 2.61 acres LOCATION: The east side of Ynez Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of Solana Way (Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE: Subject: North: South: East: West: Service Commercial / SC Service Commercial / SC Service Commercial / SC High Density Residential / H Service Commercial / SC LAND USE: Subject: Vacant North: South: East: West: Automobile Dealership Restaurant and Day Cam Facility Apartments Automobile Dealership \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc PUBLIC INPUT: To date the staff has received no public input on this application. PROJECT STATISTICS Site Area: Building Area: Building Footprint: Landscaped Area: Parking/Circulation: Other Hardscape: Lot Coverage: Target Floor Area Ratio: Proposed Floor Area Ratio: Parking Required: Parking Provided: Building Height: 113,691 sq. ft. (2,61 acres) 12,825 sq. ft. ( 11% of site) 11,930 sq. ft. (10% of site) 20,355 sq. ft. (17.9% of site) 76,579 sq. ft. (67.4% of site) 4,827 sq. ft. (4.2% of site) 11,930 sq. ft. (10% of site) 34,107 sq. ft. (0.30 FAR) 12,825 sq, ft. (0.11 FAR) 54 spaces, plus 3 motorcycle & 4 bicycle spaces 65 spaces, plus 3 motorcycle & 4 bicycle spaces 26 feet high (one-story with below-grade lube pit) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposal involves the design, construction and operation of a 12,825 square foot Saturn automobile dealership on 2.61 acres located on the East Side of Ynez Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of Solana Way, within the Temecula Auto Mall. The dealership includes new and used automobile sales and repair. The project meets or exceeds all of the standards called for in the Development Code and Design Guidelines for auto dealerships within the Service Commercial zone. BACKGROUND A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant on June 10, 1999. The formal application was submitted on September 17, 1999, and the Design Review Committee subsequently reviewed the plans on October 14, 1999. The project was deemed complete on November 18, 1999. ANALYSIS Site Design The project site is an irregular, somewhat pie-shaped parcel with a large "notch" out of its northeast corner. The building sits back from the street frontage in the center of the widest portion of the lot. Vehicle display pads, parking spaces and circulation lanes occupy the area between the building and the street, and customer and employee parking areas, circulation drives and vehicle inventory areas are distributed around both sides of the building, as well as on the narrow rear extremity of the property. There is a single access point off Ynez Road, and secondary access is provided off an emergency access easement which serves the rear of this site as well as the other properties that front on Ynez Road between Solana Way and Ynez Court. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.SatUrn Staff Report.doc 2 The main portion of the property sits at a somewhat higher elevation than the abutting automobile dealership to the north, and at-grade with the restaurant property to the south. Both of these adjoining properties are configured with parking areas and landscaping along their common boundaries with the Saturn site. The narrow, rear extension of the property, which is intended for vehicle storage, sits below the grade of surrounding areas, which includes vehicle storage on the abutting auto dealership to the north, carports and a circulation drive on the apartment property to the east, and a fenced play area at the day care center to the south. The most generous grade separations and landscaped setbacks adjoin the more sensitive apartment and day care uses to the east and south. The featured vehicle display areas and pads (as opposed to vehicle display aisles) are rather uniquely distributed on the Saturn site. There are two display pads on either side of the main entry, two additional pads flanked with landscaping on either side of the entry drive at the second display/parking aisle, as well as additional featured displays and a freestanding display pad encircled with decorative paving and landscaping just outside the main entrance to the building. Two additional vehicles are displayed within the building, and one of two large canopies at the front elevation is enclosed with glass to provide a special area for displaying and delivering a new vehicle to a customer. The vehicular entrance to the service and repair bays, which are fully contained within the building, is somewhat offset from the main entry ddve. In this fashion the view of the service entry from the street is to some degree interrupted and enhanced with intervening display pads and landscaping. Unloading of vehicles is required by Code to be accommodated on-site rather than on the street. The site plan shows this activity will occur in the circulation aisle on the north side of the building. Trash will be accommodated within an enclosure located at the northeasterly corner of the main portion of the property. We believe the site design is well done, particularly considering the difficult configuration of the parcel. Architecture The architecture is characterized by simple, rectangular forms at varying wall planes, three different building heights, and using two main materials. The lowest portions of the building are two large canopy structures - one open and one enclosed with glass - at the front of the building. These structures as well as the somewhat higher main portion of the building feature heavily textured stucco material with ~" x %" horizontal reveals or grooves regularly spaced at two foot intervals, all over a 16-inch high base course of smooth, center-scored concrete block. The tallest portion of the structure is situated over the service and repair bays at the northeast corner, and is constructed of split-faced concrete block interrupted by several 16-inch wide horizontal courses of smooth center-scored block, including a 16-inch high base to match the balance of the building, and a 16- inch high cornice element consisting of two offset blocks at the top edge. The primary building articulation and interest is therefore provided by the different wall and roof planes created by the three major rectangular forms of the structure. Additional articulation, although perhaps more functional than architectural, is provided by the building openings, including the glazing at the building entry and vehicle delivery canopy and sales area, plus the four major vehicular service doors at the front, northerly and rear elevations. The service doors at the front elevation and the forward portion of the northerly elevation contain doors with divided lights of clear glass, whereas the service doors at the rear of the structure and the rear portion of the northerly elevation are primarily made of steel with one horizontal row of windows. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99,SatUrn Staff Report.doc 3 The only accent features beyond the stucco reveals, smooth courses of center-scored block, and cornice element around the highest portion of the building, are the raised half-round accent bands applied on all three sides of both canopies and over the main service entrance. These accent bands are colored red, The primary color for the building, including both the stucco and split-faced concrete block surfaces and the large service doors, is off-whita. The smooth concrete block used as a base to the entire building and in horizontal courses and a cornice element as a contrast to the split-faced block on the highest, northeasterly portion of the structure will be left its natural light grey color. Solid metal pedestrian doors used at the northerly and easterly elevation will be colored a darker grey. All glazing will be clear glass in clear (light grey) anodized aluminum frames. Staff is generally supportive of the project design. We believe the forms and lines of the building in combination with the materials and textures are simple and functional yet well proportioned and convey a sense of substance and quality. The sole exception to this assessment is the raised half- round red accent bands used on the front of the building at the canopies and service entrance. These elements appear to be "applied" rather than an integral element of the design and seemingly bear no relation to the balance of the building architecture. In our judgment, signage and perhaps the tasteful use of a red accent stdpe that is related to and complements the overall building design, will adequately convey to prospective automobile buyers that this is a Satum dealership. Therefore, we have included a recommended Condition of Approval which eliminates the raised half-round elements and invites the applicant to submit a proposal to incorporate a red stripe into the design scheme subject to review and approval by staff. LandscaDincl The Development Code would normally require projects in the SC zone to provide a minimum 20% landscape planting. In the case of automobile dealers, however, the Code exempts vehicle display and storage areas from being landscaped internally. On the other hand, auto dealers are subject to special standards which require, among other things, a greater depth of landscaping at the street frontage and adjacent to residential uses. In the present instance, Saturn provides almost 18% total landscaping, and meets or exceeds all of the special Code requirements. They also meet the standard requirements for perimeter landscaping adjacent to non-sensitive uses. For instance, the Code requires a minimum 12-foot depth of landscaping between the frontage display aisle and the back of sidewalk. The frontage landscaping for Saturn averages almost 21 feet in depth. The Code further requires a minimum 10-foot depth of landscaping adjacent to residential uses. The total depth of landscaping for Saturn abutting the apartments to the rear is 16 feet with an additional 5 feet of landscaping on the inboard side of the emergency access ddve (including the drive, the plan shows a total setback of 45 feet between the vehicle inventory area and the apartment property line). The total depth of landscaping abutting the day care facility is almost 21 feet, with a total setback of 50 feet. The proposal also includes significant areas of landscape planting on both sides of the entry ddve at the second display/parking aisle, and at the base of the building around the service entrance. Additional landscaping is provided at selected locations at the north and south elevations, and in and around the display areas and pads adjacent to the main entrance to the building, to include both in~ground planters and some portable containers. All of the featured display areas will also be surfaced with enhanced paving. All in all, the landscaping program should be considered fairly lush for an automobile dealership. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc 4 The selection, sizing and placement of plant materials has been found by the Landscape Architect to be consistent with City requirements. Statement of Operations The facility will employ from 20-25 employees, with usually no more than 15 employees on-site at any one time. Sales hours will be from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. Service hours will be 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no repair occurring on Sundays. Certain operational parameters and restrictions, including hours, vehicle parking and storage, loading, and so on have been included as recommended Conditions of Approval for the Conditional Use Permit Traffic and Public Facilities The Public Works Department has reviewed the traffic report for the project and determined that the trips generated by this proposal will not exceed the trips anticipated by the Circulation Element for this site. The project's Floor Area Ratio (FAR) falls well below the range of the average building intensity anticipated for this area under the traffic and public facilities analysis for the General Plan. The applicant will be required to construct a raised landscaped median on Ynez Road and also pay traffic and development impact fees as conditions of approval in order to address impacts associated with the traffic or other demands on public facilities occesioned by the project. Please see attached for a copy of the Conclusions/Mitigation section from the consolidated Traffic Analysis done for this project as well as the two automobile dealerships directly to the north (Carriage Motors and Paradise Chevrolet). The Analysis reflects that the project will not effect the existing Level of Service (LOS) at surrounding intersections. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION It is anticipated that a Notice of Exemption will be filed for Planning Application No. PA99-0378 per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061 and 15332. It is found pursuant to Section 15061 that the project is exempt as a categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15332, and that the application of that exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2. Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that are less than five (5) acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; that are consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; that have no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Satum of Temecula proposal meets all of the cdteda for in-fill development, and therefore the project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Sections 15061 and 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The project is consistent with the SC Service Commercial land use designation and zone applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Upon approval of the Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit as conditioned, the project will meet all of the \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depta\PLANNING\GriffinS\378PA99.SatUrn Staff Reportdoc 5 standards and guidelines prescribed for Service Commercial development in the Development Code and Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards and guidelines, and compatible with and sensitive to the nature and quality of surrounding uses and development, including the apartments to the east and the day care facility to the south, We are therefore recommending approval of PA99-0378 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolution, Attachments PC Resolution - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval (Development Plan) - Blue Page 11 Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval (Conditional Use Permit) - Blue Page 22 Exhibits - Blue Page 25 B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Traffic Vicinity Map Zoning Map General Plan Map Site Plan Grading Plan Elevations Floor Plans Landscape Plan Analysis (Conclusions / Mitigation section only) - Blue Page 33 \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99,Saturn Staff Report.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Griffins\378PA99.Satum Staff Report.doc 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO, PA99-0378 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 12,825 SQUARE SATURN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP ON 2.61 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET SOUTH OF SOLANA WAY, AND ALSO IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 28809 WHEREAS, Saturn Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA99-03789 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed, including but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting on December 15, 1999, considered the Application at a duly noticed public hearing as proscribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2, Development Plan Findin<~s. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17,05,010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies roflected for SC Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for SC Service Commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is theroforo propedy planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation, entry features and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99,Satum Staff Repoil.doc 8 standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The design of the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or habitat off-site. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3. Conditional Use Permit Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for SC Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for SC Service Commercial contained in the City's Development Code. B. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses and has been designed in a manner so as to ensure that this use will not have an adverse affect on adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the overall design of the project, including the yards, parking, circulation, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscapin9, and other associated site improvements prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D, The nature of the proposed conditional use is generally consistent with surrounding uses, and has been designed and conditioned in a manner to protect potentially sensitive land uses to the east and south of the site, and will therefore not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. The decision to approve the application for the conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole, including the plans, exhibits, documentation and staff report and recommendation presented to and considered by the Planning Commission at the time of their decision. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been adopted for the Application per the California Environmental Act Guidelines Section 15061 and 15332. These Sections allow exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The subject site and development complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project, Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application for the design, construction and operation of a 12,825 square Satum automobile dealership on Z61 acres located on the east side of Ynez Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of Solana Way, and also identified as Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809, subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A (Development Plan), and Exhibit B (Conditional Use Permit), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc 9 Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,199__. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at its regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of December, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \~TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DeptS~PLANNING~GriffinS\378PA99.SatUrn Staff Report.doc 10 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99,Satum Staff Report.doc 11 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No: PA99-0378 - Development Plan Project Description: Design and construct a 12,825 square foot Saturn automobile dealership on 2.61 acres located on the east side of Ynez Road, south of Solaria Way (Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809) DIF Category: Retail Commercial Assessor's Parcel No: 921-290-08 Approval Date: Expiration Date: December 15, 1999 December 15, 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of this condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4c). General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its ejected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378pA99.Saturn Staff Report.cloc 12 contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, or as modified by the conditions contained herein. Landscaping shall substantially conform to approved Exhibit "E" (Landscape Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, or as modified by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. Building elevations shall substantially conform to approved Exhibit "F" (Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, or as modified by these conditions. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be screened from public view by architectural features integrated into the design of the structure. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and on approved Exhibit 'T' (Color and Materials Board) contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Second and third story primary wall: La Habra Stucco Products X-79 "Villa" First story wall and column features: La Habra Stucco Products X-25 "Saddleback" Cornices and architectural grilles: La Habra X-50 "Crystal Light" Roof tiles (metal canopy colored to match): Eagle Tile "Weathered Terra Cotta Gold" Glass: Beger "Green/Silver Gray" Glass frame White Anodized aluminum: 10. 11. 12. The trash enclosure at the rear of the site shall be architecturally treated to complement and blend with the design of the building subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. All landscape planters shall maintain a minimum clear inside dimension of five (5) feet. All planters adjacent to parking spaces shall be provided with a 12 "wide step-out the length of the planter, A minimum five (5) foot wide landscape island shall be located at the eastedy end of the entry drive to screen the motorcycle parking area from public view. All customer and employee parking spaces will be marked and reserved accordingly. All compact customer parking spaces will be marked "COMPACT CARS ONLY." All outdoor lighting shall comply with the provisions of the Palomar Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99,SatUrn Staff Report.doc 13 Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 13. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 14. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 15. The applicant shall submit five (5) full size copies, two (2) 8" x 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "G" copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 16. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 17. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown, including the 30" x 30" containers and container plants used at the display areas in and around the building entry. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identif}, the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: · Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). · One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. · Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). · Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). 18. An Administrative Development Plan application and separate building permit shall be required for all signs. 19. The plans shall include the elevations and details on the proposed outdoor lighting fixtures. These fixtures shall be subject to review and approval by staff. 20. Specifics regarding the design and materials of textured and decorative paving shown on the site plan is subject to review and approval of the Planning Department. 21. Any walls or fencing shall be of a matedal and design complementary to the overall building and site design subject to review and approval of the Planning Department. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 22. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins~378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc 14 23. 24. 25. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee the maintenance of the planrings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigafion plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed re~ectodzed sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with pdor to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 26. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 27. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 28. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 29. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 30. The Developer shall comply with the conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map 28809. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~)epta\PLANNING\Gdffins~378PA99.Satum Staff Report.doc 15 31. The vehicular movement for the proposed driveway on Ynez Road is restricted to right in/right out only. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 32. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 33. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works, 34. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 35. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 36. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 37. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board · Planning Department · Department of Public Works 38. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 39. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, pdor to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.SatUrn Staff Report,dec 16 Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 41. 42. 43. 44, 45. 46. 47. 48. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: · Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P,C.C. and 1,00% minimum over A.C. paving. · Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No, 207A. · Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. · All driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. · Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. · All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility prorider. The Developer shall construct or provide a cash deposit for half width raised landscape median on Ynez Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' PJW), from north property line to south property line of Parcel 3 of PM 28809 (along property frontage). Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Ynez Road, The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall vacate and dedicate the abutter's rights of access along Ynez Road pursuant to the new location of the driveway to Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property to the Southeast. The Developer shall provide an easement for ingress and egress to the adjacent property to the Southeast. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. \\TEMEC_FSI01\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99.Satum Staff Report,doc 17 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 49. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · Rancho California Water District · Eastern Municipal Water District · Department of Public Works 50. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works, 51. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 52. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 53. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 54. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 55. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 56. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-3/H-4. 57. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 58. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 59. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 60. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 61. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378pA99.Saturn Staff I~eport.doc 18 62. 63. 64. 65, 66. 67. 68. 69. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide an appreved automatic fire sprinkler system. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. Provide electdcal plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the appreved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. FIRE 70. 71. 72. 73. DEPARTMENT Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix ILIA, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ili- A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.Satum Staff Report.doc 19 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet, Minimum tuming radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. {CFC 8704.2 and 902.2,2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures am to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent reads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2,2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have appreved Fire Department vehicle access reads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Pdor to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as appreved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau appreval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures, The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901,2.2.2 and National Fire Pretection Association 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DeptS\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99.Satum Staff Reportdoc 20 85. Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to installation. (CFC Article 10) 86. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 87. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developedapplicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, fiammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Fire Condition: 88. Pdor to building permit issuance, a full technical report shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau addressing all items on the hazardous materials list. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA- 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. OTHER AGENCIES See attached comments from the Rancho Water District dated September 24, 1999. See attached comments from County Environmental Health dated October 4, 1999. See attached comments from the Department of Transportation dated October 14, 1999. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99.Satum Staff Report.doc 21 EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc 22 Planning Application No: Use hereby permitted: Assessor's Parcel No: Approval Date: Expiration Date: EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA99-0378 (Conditional Use Permit) Saturn automobile dealership, including new and used car sales and repair, on 2.61 acres located on the east side of Ynez Road, south of Solana Way (Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809) 921-290-08 December 15, 1999 December 15, 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The permittee and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnity, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notity the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. The permittee shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-0378 (Development Plan), unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit and where applicable on a continuing basis thereafter. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval or conditions of this Conditional Use Permit. Hours of operation shall be: For sales hours will be from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m, to 7:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. For service hours will be 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS~378PA99.SatUrn Staff Report.doc 23 All unloading of vehicles shall occur on the site within the area designated for that purpose on the site plan. Unloading of vehicles shall not occur on the street or on the emergency access drive or on podions of the site not approved for that purpose. All employee and customer parking and inventory storage shall occur on-site within the areas and spaces designated for that respective purpose on the site plan. Customer parking spaces shall remain for customer parking only, and no employee parking or inventory storage shall occur on the street or the emergency access drive or any other area not approved for that use. There shall be no outside storage or display of merchandise, pads or equipment, including tires and batteries and so on. By signing these Conditions the applicant agrees to abide by this condition and confirms his/her understanding that failure to do so shall be cause to review and possibly revoke this permit. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall submit a contingency plan or plans which will ensure there is an area for storing excess inventory off-site at a location approved for that use provided that should become necessary at some time in the future. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read and I understand and accept all the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained and the use shall be conducted in conformance with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project or operation shall be subject to Community Development Department review and approval. Applicant Name \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS~378PA99.Satum Staff Report.doc 24 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\Depts\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.Satum Staff Report.doc 25 CITY OF TEMECULA NTS ,SITEl P, ANCHO C, ALIFO~NIA ~OAP CASE NO. - PA99-0378 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 VICINITY MAP %\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\GdffinS\378PA99.SatUm Staff Report.doc 26 CITY OFTEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - SC SERVICE COMMERCIAL EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - SC SERVICE COMMERCIAL CASE NO. - PA99-0378 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%DEPTS\PLANNING\GriffinS\378pA99.Saturn S~aff Re~ort.doc 27 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0378 EXHIBIT- D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 SITE PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\Griffins\378pA99.Saturn Staff ReporLdoc 28 CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL I~;RADING PLAN PARCEL 3, PARCEL MAP 28809 CASE NO. - PA99-0378 EXHIBIT- E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 GRADING PLAN ~\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\Griffins\378PA99.SatUrn Staff Report.doc 29 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0378 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 ELEVATIONS \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING\Gdffins\378pA99.Satum Staff Report,doc 30 CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL PIT PLAN CASE NO, - PA99-0378 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 FLOOR PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\Gdffins\378PA99.Saturn Staff ReporLdoc 31 CITY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0378 EXHIBIT - H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 LANDSCAPEPLAN %\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\GriffinS~378PA99,Satum Staff Repo,l, doc 32 ATI'ACHMENT 3 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (CONCLUSIONS / MITIGATION SECTION ONLY) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\Gdffins%378PA99,Satum Staff Report.doc 33 I I II I i i i I I I I I I ! CONCLUSIONS/MITIGATION The project is calculated to significantly impact the already poorly operating intersection of Ynez Road/Winchester Road during the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours Several access and operational measures are recommended, however due to the poor operating conditions and limited availability of addition capacity at Ynez Road/ W~nchester Road, no mitigation for at this intersection is feasible. Instead, the project should contribute a fair share into a fund to be used for general improvements in the area. 1) Modify site plan with the following recommendations: a) The only recommended change on the west side of Ynez Road is the relocation of the Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury driveway approximately 150 feet to the north to align with the Pontiac/Buick/GMC dealership driveway. b) Relocate the Chevrolet/Cadillac driveway approximately 35 feet to the south to allow better access for both the Chevrolet/Cadillac dealership and the main driveway for the ChevroletJBuicb'GEO dealership on the west side of Ynez Road. c) Relocate the Pontiac/BuickJGMC dealership driveway approximately 60 feet to the north to allow better access for both the PontiadBuick/GMC dealership and the Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury dealership driveway on the west side of Ynez Road. d) It is recommended that when the Saturn dealership is developed, the driveway for this individual site be positioned close to the southern edge of the property (20 feet to 50 feet), to create the greatest distance between this driveway and the PontiadBuick/GMC driveway to the north. 2) Provide a 150 foot long southbound Jeff-turn lane at the two northern most driveways along Ynez Road. 3) Construct/modify the raised median on Ynez Road along the project frontage. 4) Restrict the three driveways along Ynez Road to right-turns outbound, by the raised median and signage. 5) Restrict the Saturn driveway along Ynez Road to right-in and right-out only. 6) Provide an on-site parking supply which meets the City code. ITEM #5 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CiTY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 15, 1999 Planning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) Case Planner: Steve Griffin, AICP RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning Application No. PA99-0345 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, and ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99- 0345 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. APPLICATION INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Holiday Inn Express APPLICANT: VCL Construction REPRESENTATIVE: Larry Levoff PROPOSAL: The design, construction and operation of a 137-room Holiday Inn Express Hotel on 3.37 acres LOCATION: The east side of Jefferson Avenue, north of Rancho California Road (Portions of Parcel 1, 2, 3 & 6 of Parcel Map 23882) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE: Subject: North: South: East: West: Highway/Tourist Commercial / HTC Highway/Tourist Commercial / HTC Highway/Tourist Commercial / HTC 1-15 Freeway Highway/Tourist Commercial / HTC LAND USE: Subject: Vacant North: Commercial South: Vacant East: 1-15 Freeway West: Vacant \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeDts\PLANNING\Griffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc PUBLIC INPUT: To date the staff has received no public input on this application. PROJECT STATISTICS Site Area: Building Area: Building footprint: Landscaped Area: Pool/Patio/Walks: Parking/Circulation Area: Lot Coverage: Target Floor Area Ratio: Proposed Floor Area Ratio: Parking Required: Parking Provided: Building Height: 146,797 sq. ft. (3.37 acres) 59,950 sq. ft. (41% of site) 22,109 sq. ft. (15% of site 39,271 sq. ft. (27% of site 11,494 sq. ft. (8% of site) 73,923 sq. ft. (50% of site 22,109 sq. ft. (15% of site 44,039 sq. ft. (0.30 FAR) 59,950 sq. ft. (0.41 FAR) 152 spaces, plus I motorcycle & 6 bicycle spaces 154 spaces, plus 4 motorcycle & 7 bicycle spaces 44 feet high (3-story) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposal involves the design, construction and operation of a 137-room, 59,950 square foot, 3-story Holiday Inn Express hotel on 3.37 acres located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho California Road. The project site is a flag-shaped lot that has the bulk of the property sitting back from the street frontage, adjoining the I-15 Freeway, with a driveway extending westerly between two vacant parcels to Jefferson Avenue. The driveway is intended as a common access point to serve the Holiday Inn as well as surrounding properties. According to the applicant, the Holiday Inn Express is a high quality, limited-service, upper mid- market franchise hotel. It is expected to serve both the travelling public as well as the longer-term visitor. It features an intedor-corddor design, larger public areas and hallways, several larger suites for families, an extended (continental) breakfast / leisure room, a gym, guest laundry facilities, a small business center (each room will also have high speed internet access), a meeting room, a swimming pool, and a separate, large exterior patio. Being limited-service, it does not feature a restaurant or a lounge. The project meets or exceeds all of the basic standards called for in the Development Code for Highway Tourist commercial development with the exception of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The target FAR for this zone is 0.30, whereas the proposed FAR is 0,41 .The Planning Commission may grant an increase in FAR beyond the 0.30 target, up to a maximum FAR of 1,0, based on a determination of the extent to which the project provides exceptional community or public benefits or aspects consistent with at least one of three incentive categories outlined in the Development Code. This issue is discussed later in this report under "FAR Incentives." \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS~345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Reportdoc 2 BACKGROUND A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant on July 1, 1999. The formal application was submitted on September 1, 1999, and the Design Review Committee subsequently reviewed the plans on September 23, 1999. The project was deemed complete on November 17, 1999. ANALYSIS Site Desicln The 3-story, L-shaped building is situated in a north-south direction on the central portion of the site, between the 1-15 Freeway and two vacant parcels fronting Jefferson Avenue. A swimming pool adjoins the west side of the building, and a large open patio occupies the inside portion of the "L" on the east side of the building. Circulation aisles, parking spaces and landscaping encircle the building and occupy the balance of the property. A canopied arrival point and the lobby entrance are located at the south end of the structure, directly off the main entry drive. The main vehicular access point off Jefferson Avenue is defined by special entry features, a landscaped median, and perimeter landscaping on both sides of the full length of the drive. The hotel would have right/left-in, right-out only access off Jefferson from the main entry drive, as well as access to a signalized intersection off another private drive to the north that aligns with Del Rio Road on the opposite side of Jefferson Avenue. The ultimate plan shows an additional right-in, right-out only access point to the south. This series of private drives is intended to eventually serve all seven parcels comprising this Highway Tourist district. With the exception of the Holiday Inn proposal and the previously approved but yet to constructed Rosa's Caf~ abutting the northwest portion of the hotel property, none of the other five vacant parcels within this district have approved plans. Loading activity will mainly consist of small vans rather than larger trucks and therefore will be accommodated at one location on the easterly side of the building, and also under the canopied main entrance. Trash will be accommodated within an enclosure at the far north end of the property. Architecture As noted above, the building is a 45-foot high, 3-story, L-shaped structure. The main lobby entrance and most heavily articulated portion of the structure is at the southwest corner of the building. This portion of the structure features three changes in wall plane, hipped and gabled roof elements and column features surrounding large arched windows, as well as a large arched canopy extending out over the vehicular arrival point. The main structure is fully roofed with flat concrete roof tiles, whereas the canopy has a raised rib barrel roof colored to match. There will be no exposed roof equipment or views of flat, unadorned roof surfaces. All of the roof eaves, column and canopy elements feature an architectural cornice detail as well. The gabled roof and column elements featured at the main entrance are duplicated at two locations each along the length of the westerly and easterly building elevations. These are significant, substantial elements with two changes in wall plane as well as an arched third story window to simulate the more elaborate window treatment at the main entry. In addition to these featured elements of the building, a raised horizontal wainscot band is provided to create a base to the building between the first and higher levels, and the area extending between the first and third \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99.HoIiday Inn Staff Report.doc 3 levels at a width equal to the outer edges of the windows is recessed six inches to provide additional vertical articulation. The windows at the first level, which are essentially flush with the surface of the wall, are enhanced at their top edge with raised arched elements. Of particular concem to staff has been the proposal to provide individual air conditioning units for each of the rooms. This is apparently a more effective, as well more economical way, to provide individualized air conditioning to each room, but it presents a design challenge in treating the "exposed" units below each window. In this instance, the units will be flush with the exterior wall surface of the building, with the bulk of the unit extending into the rooms themselves. They are also using a finely Iouvered grille that will be painted to match and largely blend with the exterior wall surfaces. Finally, a customized architectural metal grille will be placed over the functioning air conditioning grille in order to help tie the units into the overall detailing of the building design. The colors and materials for the project all exhibit muted earth tones. The main body of the building above the first story and including the wainscot element will feature the lightest color, termed La Habra, with the first story and column elements featuring a somewhat darker color called Villa. The cornices and architectural air conditioning grilles will be painted white. The color of the roof tiles is termed Weathered Term Cotta Gold, which is the same color that will be featured on the metal roof of the canopy over main arrival point. Landscaping The Landscape Plan reflects 27% landscape planting, or 7% more than the 20% required by Code. This figure excludes the "bardscape" elements consisting of the pool area, separate exterior patio and the decorative pedestrian walks. Significant areas of landscape planting and decorative hardscape are provided adjacent to the east and west sides of the building, and in and around the canopied lobby entrance as well. The north, west and east perimeters of the main portion of the property also feature significant landscape planting at least twice the minimum five (5) foot width called for by the Code. The landscaping interior to the parking areas, consisting of aisle-end planters, landscape fingers and a landscape strip provided in the northerly parking lot, also meet or exceed City requirements. Worthy of special note is the main vehicular access point and entry drive. Large landscape planters with low decorative walls and special landscape planting are located on both sides of the intersection with Jefferson Avenue. This entry point is further enhanced with decorative paving and a landscaped median which extends some 130 feet up the length of the driveway. The boundades of the drive also feature pedestrian walks and 5-foot wide landscaped easements on both sides (the use of easements at these locations will allow the landscaping to also be incorporated into the landscaping program of the adjacent vacant parcels when they develop). A 5-foot wide strip of landscaping will also be provided on the far south side of the circulation drive opposite the hotel structure. The view of the project from the freeway at one of our major gateways is of particular concern to staff. As alluded to above, the easterly boundary of the property adjoining the freeway right-of-way has been provided with a landscape planter over 10 feet in width, which is more than twice what the Code requires. This area has been proposed for, and further conditioned to provide dense screen planting with higher vertical specimen tree clusters in order to soften and enhance this boundary. There currently exists in the abutting freeway right-of-way several large trees and shrubs which will provide an immediate effect as the on-site landscaping matures. \\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1%Depts\PLANNING\Griffins\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Report.doc 4 Floor Area Ratio {FAR) Incentives The Planning Commission may consider an increase in the FAR, from the target FAR of 0.30, up to a maximum FAR of 1.0, based on the degree to which the project meets the City's performance standards, and provided the project meets at least one of three incentive categories described in Section 17.08.050 of the Development Code. The categories include: (1) uses which provide outstanding employment, fiscal, social and economic benefits, (2) projects which exhibit exceptional architectural and landscape design, and (3) projects which provide public facilities beyond the norm. In support of the request, the applicant has submitted information which identifies factors in all three incentive categories (please see attached letter). The information can be summarized as follows: Employment, fiscal and economic · The creation of 63 permanent jobs with an estimated average annual payroll of $560,000. The majority of the employees would be hired locally, according to the applicant. Estimated annual tax revenues to the City of Temecula of over $240,000, including $235,000 in transit occupancy taxes (TOT), $1,000 in sales taxes (Note: the City's share of the sales taxes is about 13% of the $7,600 total amount mentioned in their letter), and $5,376 in property taxes (Note: the City's share of the property taxes is about 6% of the $96,000 mentioned in their letter). · Estimated annual expenditures of $1.0 million by guests in local restaurants, shopping and entertainment facilities. · Estimated annual expenditures by the hotel of $178,000 for local support services and supplies. Architectural and landscape design One of the examples of exceptional architectural and landscape design listed in the Development Code is "landscaped entry features." As described above, this proposal includes a significant landscaped entry treatment involving corner entry features adjacent to Jefferson Avenue, and a landscaped median extending nearly the full length of the main entry drive. The applicant has also pointed out several ways in which they believe the project responds to the City's performance standards. These include the use of creative entry treatments, variety of window shapes, varying building shapes, the use of a variety of complementary colors and materials, and so on. Public facilities One of the examples listed in the Development Code under the public facilities category is "the provision of community meeting centers." The Holiday Inn will have a 500 square foot conference room as well as over 1,000 square feet in the great room that will be available for meetings. While perhaps not meeting the definition of a "meeting center", these facilities will provide both business and non-business meeting space within the community, and will be made available to non-profit service or charitable organizations at little or no cost, according to the applicant. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff ReporLdoc 5 The applicant also points out the quality and facilities offered by the hotel, the City's need for such a hotel and the fact that the project will be responsible for the construction of a median in Jefferson Avenue. Based on these community benefits, staff believes the requested increase in FAR from 0.30 to 0.41 appears to be cleady supportable. Not only will the Holiday Inn create jobs and generate significant revenues for the City and local businesses, but in our judgment, the project will also help support the revitalization of Old Town Temecula, and hopefully spur additional quality development and redevelopment along the Jefferson Avenue corridor. It will further provide attractive, convenient accommodations for our guests and visitors, Traffic and Public Facilities The Public Works Department has reviewed the traffic report for the project and determined that the trips generated by this proposal will not exceed the trips anticipated by the Circulation Element for this site. The project's Floor Area Ratio (FAR) falls within the range of the average building intensity anticipated under the original traffic and public facilities analysis for the General Plan. The applicant will be required to construct a median and deceleration lane on Jefferson Avenue and also pay traffic and development impact fees as conditions of approval in order to address impacts associated with the traffic or other demands on public facilities occasioned by the project. Please see attached for a copy of the Opening Year Conditions and Conclusions sections of the focused Traffic Study done for the project. In essence the Study shows that with or without the project, the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Rancho California Road will operate at LOS "D" in the AM and LOS "F" in the PM. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION It is anticipated that a Notice of Exemption will be filed for Planning Application No. PA99-0345 per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061 and 15332. It is found pursuant to Section 15061that the project is exempt as a caategodcal exemption pursuant to Section 15332, and that the application of that exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2. Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that are less than five (5) acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; that are consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; that have no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Holiday Inn proposal meets all of the criteria for in-fill development, and therefore the project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Sections 15061 and 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The project is consistent with the HT Highway/Tourist commercial land use designation and zone applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Upon approval of the Development Plan as conditioned, the project will meet all of the standards and guidelines \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GrfffinS\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Report.dec 6 prescribed for Highway/Tourist commercial development in the Development Code and Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards and guidelines, and compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development. Staff is supporting the requested increase in the FAR (from 0.30 to 0.41) based on the project's fiscal, economic and other benefits to the City and its residents, as well as its attractive design qualities and features. We are therefore recommending conditional approval of PA99-0345 based on the following findings. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (HT) Highway/Tourist development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for HT Highway/Tourist commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and intensity of development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City-Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation, entry features and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Furthermore it has been found that the project provides fiscal, economic and other community benefits and enhanced design features consistent with the FAR incentive categories identified in the Development Code (TMC 17.08.050A2), which support the requested increase in FAR from 0.30 to 0.41. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There is no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site, The property is an in-fill site, surrounded by development and praviously graded. The project will therefore not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Report.doc 7 Attachments PC Resolution - Blue Page 9 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval- Blue Page 12 Exhibits - Blue Page 24 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Elevations G. Floor Plans H. Landscape Plan Applicant letter in support of requested increase in FAR - Blue Page 32 Focused Traffic Study (selected sections only) - Blue Page 33 \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\Depts~PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc 9 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0345, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 59,950 SQUARE FOOT, 137-ROOM HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOTEL ON 3.37 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND ALSO IDENTIFIED AS PORTIONS OF PARCEL 1, 2, 3 & 6 OF PARCEL MAP 23882 WHEREAS, VCL Construction filed Planning Application No. PA99-0345, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0345 was processed, including but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0:345 on December 15, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission conditionally approved Planning Application No. PA99-0345. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in conditionally approving Planning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for HT Highway Tourist development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for HT Highway Tourist development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation, entry features and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99,HOliday Inn Staff Report,doc 10 standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Furthermore it has been found that the project provides fiscal, economic and other community benefits and enhanced design features consistent with the FAR incentive categories identified in the Development Code (TMC 17.08.050A2), which support the requested increase in FAR from 0.30 to 0.41. C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, There is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or habitat off-site. The property is an in-fill site, surrounded by development and previously graded. The project will therefore not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been adopted for Planning Application No. PA99-0345 per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061 and 15332. These Sections allow exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) for the design, construction and operation of a 59,950 square foot, 137-room Holiday Inn hotel on 3.37 acres located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho California Road, and also identified as portions of Parcel 1, 2, 3 & 6 of Parcel Map 23882, subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of December, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of December, 1999, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS~345pA99,HOliClay Inn Staff Report,doc 11 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%DeptS\PLANNING\GrfffinS\345PA99,Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc 12 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No: PA99-0345 - Development Plan Project Description: Design, Construct and operate a 59,950 square foot, 137- room Holiday Inn Express hotel on 3.37 acres located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue, north of Rancho California Road (Portions of Parcel 1, 2, 3 & 6 of Parcel Map 23882) DIF Category: Service Commercial Assessor's Parcel No: 921-060-036 Approval Date: Expiration Date: December 15, 1999 December 15, 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty~Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Depadment - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and Califomia Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of this condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4c). General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report,doc 13 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Floor Plans), and H (Landscape Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, or as modified by the conditions contained herein, Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The trash enclosure at the rear of the site shall be architecturally treated to complement and blend with the design of the building subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. All landscape planters shall maintain a minimum clear inside dimension of five (5) feet, All planters adjacent to parking spaces shall be provided with a 12" wide step-out the length of the planter. A minimum five (5) foot wide landscape island shall be located at the easterly end of the entry drive to screen the motorcycle parking area from public view, The narrower landscape finger located closest to the westerly side of the building shall be relocated to the approximate center of that row of parking spaces in which it is located. The project entry off Jefferson Avenue, including the area fronting the entry walls and the area under the palms, shall be enhanced using flowering ground covers/shrubs or other color subject to review and approval of the City Landscape Architect. In addition to the planted areas shown on the Landscape Plan, any sloped areas created by the project on surrounding and abutting properties shall be planted for erosion control in accordance with the Landscape Architecrs requirements. Trees shall be provided at 30 feet on-center along the private drive abutting the westerly boundary of the project. Any walls or fencing shall be of a matedal and design complementary to the overall building and site design subject to review and approval of the Planning Department. All compact-parking spaces will be marked for "COMPACT CARS ONLY." The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and on Exhibit "1' (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development Department * Planning Division. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99,Holiday tnn Staff Report.doc 14 Second and third story primary wall: La Habra Stucco Products X-79 "Villa" First story wall and column features: La Habra Stucco Products X-25 "Saddleback" Cornices and architectural grilles: La Habra X-50 "Crystal Light" Roof tiles (metal canopy colored to match): Eagle Tile "Weathered Tetra Cotta Gold" Glass: Beger "Green/Silver Gray" Glass frame White Anodized aluminum: 16. All outdoor lighting shall comply with the provisions of the Palomar Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 18. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files, 19. The applicant shall submit five (5) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1" copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 20. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 21. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan, Water usage calculations per Chapter 17,32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). 22. An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff F~eport.doc 15 23. 24. Specifics regarding the design and materials of textured and decorative paving shown on the site plan is subject to review and approval of the Planning Department. The landscape planting along the easterly boundary abutting the 1-15 right-of-way will consist of dense screen planting with vertical specimen tree groupings subject to the review and approval of the Landscape Architect. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee the maintenance of the landscape plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed re~ectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking spaca finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696~3000." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\Depts\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report,doc 16 General Requirements 30, A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 31. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 32. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of- way. 33. All improvement plans, grading plans, and raised landscaped median plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 34. The vehicular movement from the driveway on Jefferson Avenue will be restricted to right in/right outJleft in. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 35. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 36. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 37. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 38. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 39. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt, 40. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Griffins\345PA99,HOliday Inn Staff Report,doc 17 · San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board · Flood Control and Water Conservation District · Planning Department · Department of Public Works 41. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 42. Permanent landscape and irdgation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 43. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 44. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 45. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: 46. · Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. · Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. · Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461. · Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402. · All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. · Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. · Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility, The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\Depts\PLANNING~Gdffins~345PA99,Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc 18 47. Jefferson Avenue (Major Highway Standards - 100' RAN) from Del Rio Road to the southerly Parcel Map No. 23882 boundary: Improve roadway to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 12 foot wide raised landscaped median. The raised landscaped median on Jefferson Avenue shall be continuous with provisions for a dual left turn pocket as approved on the development plan. The Developer can receive Development Impact Fee credits for the other half of the raised landscaped median. Provide additional right-of-way dedication along Jefferson Avenue for the main entrance into the project site. The dedication shall be a minimum of 150 foot long 10 foot wide and shall be offered for dedication to the City. This additional right-of-way shall be used as a decaleration lane. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. 48. · Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and striping. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 49. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 50. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. 51. The Developer shall provide an easement for ingress and egress to the adjacent property. 52. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. 53. The Developer shall vacate and dedicate the abutters rights of access along Jefferson Avenue pursuant to the new location of the driveway. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 54. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · Rancho California Water District · Eastern Municipal Water District · Department of Public Works \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\DeptS\PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc 55. 56. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standarcs to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 57. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanicel Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; Califomia Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 58. Submit at time of plan review a complete extedor site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 59. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 60. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 61. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be R-I/B/A-3. 62. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 63. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 64. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 65. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 66. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 67. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 68. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Chapter 29. 69. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 70. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1~Depts\PLANNING~Gdffins~345PA99,Holiday Inn Staff Report,doc 20 71. Provide electdcal plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 72. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 73. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 74. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 75. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 76. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 77. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill,A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM for a total fire flow of 2200 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903,2, Appendix Ili- A) 78. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spacad at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 79, As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 80. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent reads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902,2.2.2) \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99,HOliday Inn Staff Report.doc 21 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87, 88. 89. 90. Pdor to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GV~N with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4) All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl\Depts\PLANNING\GdffinS~345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Report.doc 22 OTHER AGENCIES See attached correspondence from the Rancho Water District dated April 12, 1999. See attached correspondence from the Department of Environmental Health dated April 14, 1999. See attached correspondence from the County Flood Control District dated April 30, 1999. See attached correspondence from the California Department of Transportation dated September 28, 1999 By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\E)eptS\PLANNING\GdffinS~345pA99,HOliday Inn Staff Report.doc 23 September 8, 1999 Steve Griffin, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCELS NOS. 1.2, 3, 4, AND 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23822 APN 921-060-036 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0345 Dear Mr. Griffin: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is Jocated within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service. therefore, would be avafiable upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the prope~y owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 99~S8:mc2:25~=012-T5%FCF ' TO: DEPART~IE~NT OF E~W'IROt"qNIENTAL HEALTH DATE: 'September 7, 1999 CITY OF TEMZCULA PLA..N'N~'G DEPARTMENT ATT~': Steve Griffin, Project Pintruer [I FROM &//'~ Gregor Dellenbach,Registered Environmental Health Specia:Hst IV RE: PA99-0345 (previously Pre-App No. PR990010) ' '" ---- I. TIle Depaz~:ment oC Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Pia. n No. PA99-0345 and has no objections. Sanitar?' sewer and water ser'~'ices may be available in titis area. PRIOR TO .ANY PLAN CHECK SUB3IITTAj., for healtl: clearance. the ~'ollowing items at'e reqttired: a) "V~.'ill~serve" leaers ~'om the appropriate water and sewerlag agencies. b) c) T;~ee complete sets ofplaz:s for each food establishment (to include vending macla-ines) y,'ill be submitted. including a fixture schedule. a finish schedule. and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance ~th the California Uniform R. etail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facilit?' Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022). Three complete sets of plans for the s'.virrkming pool/spa ,.viil be submitted. in order to ensttre compliance with the California Administrative Code, California Health and Safe ,ry Code and Unll'~nm Building Code. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTR~CT September 29, 1999 City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecuta, CA 92589-9033 909.788.9965 FAX Attention: Steve Griffin Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PA 99-0345 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of ReaI Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items as specific interest to the District inciuding District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, inrbrmarion of a genera/nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safe,~/, or any other such issues. PA 99-0345 is a proposal to ccnsa'uct a I37-room h, otet on 3.37 acres located northeast of Front Street and Rancho California Road. A small southwestern portion of the parcel is ~vithin the 100-year Zone AE floodplain limits for ,'v[urrieta Creek as delineated on Panel No. 0607'42-0005B of the Flood insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program administered by the Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA). The water surface elevation for the FEND, flow rate of 28,500 cfs is i008.00 at the upstream edge of the property. A District flood study determined the base flood elevation for the master plan flow rate of 36,300 cfs to be 1011.76 at the upstream edge of the propera,,'. The City, should be aware that in [993 s:orm;:'atcr flowed down Front Street and crossed this property, on its way to Mutt{eta Creek. The high-water mark during the flood of January 1993 ~vas i010.19. All the elevations are based on 1929 NGVD. Because of extreme hazard posed by Murrieta Creek, the City should consider not allowing development to proceed until the u/t/mate flood control improvement can be constructed. ff the City.' chooses to allo,v deveJopment to proceed. we recommend that the Ci~' require the applicant to pamcipate in a financing me':hanism such as an assessment d/strict to ensure necessan:' improvements are constructed. [n addition. Cit7 shoutd also condition the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans or other information ~,eeded to meet FE>[A requirements. In this case. the new building should be floodproofed by constructing the finished floor a minimum of I2 inches above the District's base flood elevation for 36.300 cfs, which is 1012.76. Ci~/ofTemecu/a -2- September 29. 1999 Re! PA 99-0345 This project is located ~vithin the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek/'remecula Valtey Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of building or grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rare in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to me at 909/955.1214. Very truly yours, STUART E. MCK/BBFN Senior Civil Engineer SKM:sIj DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 484 W Fourth Street. 6' Floor MS 726 Sa~.i~ernardino. CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-6327 FAX (909) 383-6890 September 28, 1999 08-Riv-15-4.980 Mr. Steve Griffin Planning Department City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589°9033 Dear Mr. Griffin: Hofidav Inn ExDress. Case Number PA99-0345, VCL Construction, Apolicant We have received the site plan for the above noted project scheduled for discussion at the recent Development Review Committee meeting held September 23, 1999. Although the date of this meeting has passed, we ask that the following comments be included among those considered as final conditions of approval for this three-story, 137-room hotel project. This project is proposed on propert,/that abuts I-15 right of way located near Rancho California Road. We believe that an impact to our facilities may exist due to grading and possible slope construction within the landscape area proposed along the eastedy project boundary. Plan approval and encroachment permit issuance will be necessary if such impacts are in fact proposed. When available, prease forward copies of detailed site grading and drainage plans so that any construction impacts to Interstate 15 right of way may be determined and appropriate recommendations made. We apologize for our delayed response and for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Rosa F. Clark at (909) 383-6908 for assistance. Sincerely, LINDA GRIMES, Chief Office of Forecastin¢lGR-CEQA Review Transportation Planning Division CO: Frank Lehr, Freeway Operations Naidu Athuluru, Encroachment Permits/Riv. Co. Melvin Mendez, Encroachment Permits/Riv. Co. RFG'DP/15TEM_,=A99"O845,dCx:: ATI'ACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS \\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DeptS\PLANNING%GriffinS\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff ReporLdoc 24 CITY OF TEMECULA / / CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 VICINITY MAP F:I.DEpTS\pLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Rel~ort.doc CITY OFTEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - HT HIGHWAY TOURIST EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - HT HIGHWAY TOURIST CASE NO. - PA99-0345 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.HoIiday Inn Staff Report.doc CITY OF TEMECULA WROUGHT IRON FENCE SITE PLAN CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT- D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 SITE PLAN F:I. DEPTS\PLANNING~GnffinS\345PAgg. Holiday Inn Staff Report.c~oc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT- E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 GRADING PLAN F:\DEPTS\PLANNWNG\GdffinsL345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Re~ort, doc CITY OF TEMECULA DETAIL AT WINDOW ~ ARCIIIT£CTURAL DETAIL CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT- F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 ELEVATIONS F:\DEPTS%PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.HOliday Inn S~aff Repon.doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, '1999 ELEVATIONS \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNtNG\Gdffins\345pA99,Holiday Inn Staff Repod.doc CITY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- DECEMBER 15, 1999 FLOOR PLAN F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\GriffinS\345PA99.Holiclay Inn Staff Report.dec CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 FLOOR PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\Gdffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report.c~oc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT - H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 LANDSCAPEPLAN F:\DEPTS\PLANNING~Gnffi~s\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report. doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0345 EXHIBIT - H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- DECEMBER 15, 1999 LANDSCAPE PLAN F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\Griffins\345PA99.HOliday Inn Staff Report,doc A'I'FACHMENT 3 APPLICANT LETTER IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR INCREASE IN FAR \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DeptS\PLANNING\GdffinS\345PA99,HOliday Inn Staff Report.doc 32 ARCHITECTS 1700 HAMNER AVENUE. SUITE 204. NORCO, CALIFORNIA 92860-2961 (909) 371-2057 FAX (909) 371-5924 To: Honorable Chairman and Members City of Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA. 92589-9033 November 29, 1999 Re: PA 99-0345 The following letter has been prepared to help outline the benefits and amenities our project has to offer the city and community. We understand that in order to increase the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) certain requirements and amenities need to be provided. Section 17.08.050 of the City of Temecula Development Code outlines the three factors that can be considered by the Planning Commission in granting an increase in the FAR. These factors are: 1 .The project includes uses which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city with respect to the employment, fiscal, social, and economic needs of the community 2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscapes design amenities which reflect an attractive image and character for the city and 3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those required mitigation impact measures. In order to address the first of the three considerations for approving an increase in FAR several points have been outlined to demonstrate the benefits this project will bring to the City of Temecula. Points 2 and 6 are critical to the developer and the investors of this project from a hotel performance and investment cost stand-point. 1. JOB CREATION: The 137-room project stands to create approximately 63 jobs with an anticipated average payroll over 10 years of $558,000.00 annually within the City of Temecula. Should the FAR not be approved and a smaller hotel be constructed the number of jobs would reduce to approximately 48 and the payroll to $421,000.00. The net result would reduce payroll by an estimated $1.37 million over a 10 year period. If approved the hotel will generate a pavroll of $5.58 million over 10 vears with almost all the emplovees being, hired from within the City of Temecula. In addition over 100 construction-related jobs, either hired directly by the general contractor of this project or through sub-contractors, would be created during the estimated 6-month construction period of the hotel. 2. HIGH OUALITY UPPER MID-MARKET FRANCHISE: Holiday Inn Express is a high quality tried and tested upper mid-market franchise. Its strict development guidelines require a extended complimentary, breakfast / leisure room. minimum 5 feet wide inside corridors, a swimming pool, guest laundry facilities. meeting rooms, and enlarged public areas. A reduction in any of these design criteria will certainly force the project to reduce the quality of its franchise to an economy brand such as Travelodge or Days Inn. The developers are not desirous of develooin~ a economv motel. however. it would not serve the best interest of the Citv of Temecula since several economv motels alreadv exist in the city. 3. INCREASED OCCUPANCY, SALES, AND PROPERTY TAXES: A detailed market feasibility study for the Holiday Inn Express project has been conducted. Based on the report there are considerable tax benefits to The City of Temecula as a result of approving the 137-room project. Occupancy and average room rate assumptions are summarized below and are detailed in the attached spread sheet. The Holiday Inn Express based on its location, design, facilities. umenities. franchise brand recognition and powerful reservation system was projected to achieve a first year occupancy rate of 68.48 percent, with a stabilized occupancy of 73.60 percent in its third year. Average room rates were projected based on an actual average increase in room rates of 6.94 percent annually achieved by Temecula hotels over the past 6 years. The project wilI achieve an average room rate of $74.19 in its first year and increases were conservatively limited to 4 pement within years 2 and 3, and at only 2 percent thereafter. In summary, an approval in the FAR variance will allow the following estimated 10 year average in tax collection to the City of Temecula. Transient Occupancy Taxes $235,000.00 annually "or" $2.35 million over 10 years Sales Tax Collections $ 7,600.00 annually "or" $76.6 thousand over 10 years Property Tax collections $ 96,000.00 annually "or" $960 thousand over 10 years A total of $3.38 million dollars over 10 vears in tax collections are estimated to be generated for the City of Temecula. 4. SECONDARY NON-HOTEL REVENUES TO TEMECULA AREA BUSINESSES: The Holiday Inn Express is a limited-service hotel, limited in that it does not provide a full service restaurant and lounge on site. This limited aspect allows hotel guests to share their expendable dollars with local area restaurants, lounges, shopping and entertainment facilities. It is a well-known industry fact that the typical hotel guest spends approximately $20.00 to $30.00 in other non-hotel related activities each day of their stay. Based on a stabilized occupancy of 73.60 percent, 36.804 rooms would be sold annually. The average persons per room are estimated at an average of 1.4. for a total of 1,526 guests that would stay at the Holiday Inn Express annually. The ~uests expendin~ an avera~,e of iust $20.00 per dav would equate to an estimated $1.030.513.00 annualIv or $10.3 million over 10 vears in non-hotel related revenues to local businesses in Temecula. 5. LOCAL AREA HOTEL SUPPORT RELATED BUSINESS: In terms of local area support services, the hotel would launder its own linens and towels, landscaping is generally contracted to a local maintenance companies strictly from an expertise and cost benefit point of view. The hotel will also generate considerable supply purchases from local markets be it breakfast supplies, soaps, tissue paper, other day to day guest supplies, property maintenance and management needs. It is estimated that the project will generate on an average over 10 years the following revenues to local area companies: Breakfast food supplies $ 59,000.00 annually Guest room / Cleaning supplies $ 69,000.00 annually Maintenance / Printing /Misc. $ 50.000.00 annually Total $178,000.00 annually "or'1.78 million over 10years 6. DEVELOPERS LAND COST CONSTRAINTS: Cost and a reasonable return on investment, as with any development, is a critical factor. The cost of the land base of $1.4 million and the overall project development cost of $9.2 million has to be justified to the investors, providing them with reasonable return on investment. The type of facility and its franchise dictate the average room rates and the occupancy a hotel would secure. For mid size hotels the land cost must be based on $10.000.00 per room. In trying to achieve a minimal FAR, the developers have purchased 3.4 Acres from Cortez development at a reasonable market price of $9.40 per square foot. The cost per room based on a smaller hotel is $13,662.00 far higher than is acceptable for mid-priced hotel investors. The cost per room based on the 137-room project is $10,0772.00 per room which is in line with investor requirements. It must be noted that the applicants have not requested anv offsets a_,2ainst transient occupancv taxes. 6. FISCAL SUMMARY: There are significant financial benefits to the City of Temecula, its local businesses and the surrounding community. Holiday Inn's are a proven high quality franchise that are represented in most American cities and perform well above industry standards. The proposed Holiday Inn Express revenues to the City of Temecula are realistic and achievable. We estimate that over a 10 year period the City of Temecula, its residents and local businesses will see a total of $5,580,000.00 in payroll to local area residence $3,380,000.00 in Transient Occupancy, Sales and Property tax Collections. $10,300,000.00 in local non-hotel related business revenues. $1,780,000.00 in local area support related business revenues. The developers hieh investment will produce a modern high quality hotel that will produce an estimated economic benefit to the City of Temecula over the next 10 vears of $21.040.000.00. In order to meet factor #2 of Section 17.08.050 ( 2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscapes design amenities which reflect an attractive image and character for the city' ) every, effort was made to follow the cities General Performance Standards. Section 17.08.040 states, in pan, "Considerations for approval of development plans and for awarding floor area ratio bonuses will be based upon both the development standards and the degree of conformante with the performance standards".the following is a list of the General Performance Standards followed by an explanation on how the project has met with that standard. Use creative entry treatments with such features as canopies, awnings, cornices or atriums. This has been accomplished by our entrance canopy which includes a metal barrel roof that matches the color of the main roof supported by large cylinder columns finished to math the trim of the main building. Landscape features as welI as a cornice detail below the roof ties the canopy architecturally to the main building. Use a variety of complementary colors and avoid the use of just one color and dark colors. We have provided a variation in our color scheme that has the tower elements and the first floor portion of the building darker in color than the body. We have also provided a cornice detail, a waist band detail and other trim elements which will be a different color than the body or the tower elements. Use various window shapes and sizes. Although this is a hotel and there are several windows of the same size; We have provided areas that will feature large arched windows. At the main entrance to the hotel we have large arched windows that exceed 30'-0" in height and also help complement our interior common space. The grid pattern in the windows will match the trim color of the building and provide visual interest. Architectural air conditioning grills will be installed below the guest room windows. Architectural grills are flush with the exterior finish of the structure and streamline so that when painted the same color as the finish they will blend ~vith the area around them. Over the top of each grill a wrought iron decorative grill will be mounted to the structure to provide visual interest. The wrought iron grill will protrude from the wall only enough to provide proper circulation for the air conditioning grill and will be painted to match the trim of the building. Vary the building shapes by using curved or angled walls. Although we do not have angled or curved walls, we have varied the shape of the building by use of tower elements at the guest room portion of the hotel which adds contrast to the building facade. The tower elements are created by the varying room sizes which will allow the tower elements to protrude nearly 6 feet. The entrance portion of the building is highlighted by the large roof gables and taller tower elements that protrude from the main structure. The entrance also provides the location for the change in direction of the floor plan creating a basic "L' shape to the structure. Separate buildings or accessory structures should be designed as an integral part of the primary building by using complementary materials, common architectural elements, and special landscape design techniques. The only separate structures are the entrance canopy and the fence that surround the pool area. Both contain the same primary building features and colors as the main structure. The fence will be wrought iron that will match the trim of the structure supported by plaster columns that will match the main body of the hotel in color with an architectural cap that will match the trim as well. Use a consistent design theme throughout the project. Employ complementary or consistent details, shapes, materials and color. In addition, consistent signage should be provided be provided with complementary colors, lettering, placement and materials. A consistent design theme has been accomplished by the use of matching tower elements, cornice details and colors. The tower elements at the entrance portion of the hotel are larger than those located in the guest room portion of the hotel, this is done intentionally to draw more attention to the entrance. The signage for the project is not being reviewed at this time, and will be reviewed under a different submittal. The bulk of the building should be divided to reduce the apparent scale and provide visual interest. Box-like designs should be avoided. This has been accomplished by the use of proportional variations in the building footprint. We have provided architectural projections between each line of windows in order to create building shadows. Horizontal elements such as the waist band and the cornice have been provided to break the visual mass of the facade into smaller areas. Tower elements have been designed with a gable roof that divides the roof and provides visual interest. The tower elements at the guest room portion arc designed to provide contrast in the building facade without taking the focus away from the main entrance of the hotel. With respect to factor #3 of Section 17.08.050 (The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those required mitigation impact measures.) A continence decision was made to provide facilities that would benefit the community as a whole. JEFFERSON STREET MEDIAN: As part of the development of this project, construction of a median along Jefferson Ave., a Public Works goal for several years. will be constructed. Though some assistance is being provided by the city, the size of the Holiday inn express project makes the cost of the median bearable for the developer. The addition of the median will add to the appeal and safety of the area and help ignite addition development at this location. ENHANCED FACILITIES: A large outdoor plaza area bordered by landscape features has been provided for the use of both the community and guests. An out door pool area: adjacent to the great room, with landscape surrounding the area has been provided for the guests. A meeting room and Business Center will be provided near the main entrance of the hotel for the use of both guests and local business. High speed Internet access will be provided to all rooms. A large percentage of the rooms will be designed as suites for families. With the help of city staff and approval of the franchise the building elevation has been modified from the Holiday Inn standard to incorporate a more attractive image. As part of the overall development we have provided an enhanced entry with landscaped medians and proposed monument signs to be utilized by the entire development. It is our intention with these design amenities. along with the landscape features, to provide an attractive image which reflects the character of the community.. HIGH OUALITY MODERN HOTEL NEEDED IN TEMECULA: The developers are investing approximately $9.2 million in developing an attractive, modern, state of the art interior corridor hotel. Interior corridor hotels are perceived to be safer and achieve a higher level of security for guests due to the restricted number of entrances. Many of Temecula economy hotels are over 12 years old with some in poor repair, the City of Temecula lacks in the number of upper mid-market franchise hotels, such as the proposed Holiday in Express. It is a well known fact that Temecula hotels sell out frequently during weekends and festivals forcing visitors to either cancel their plans or stay within Temecula's near by cities creating "leakage" in Temecula's transient occupancy tax revenues. With the anticipated development of the Rogers-Dale project in Murrieta proposed to open in the 2001, the problem with weekend sellout will greatly increase. In conclusion, we believe that this project will provide the city with enhanced public facilities. exceptional architectural and landscape amenities as well as provide exceptional benefits to the city with respect to the employment, fiscal. social and economic needs of the community. We do not believe; nor has city staff concluded. that the increase in the F.A.R. will create unmitigable impacts upon traffic circulation or overburden the utilities serving that area. I hope the City of Temecuta Planning Commission, in view of the points presented in this letter, will look favorable on approving the hotel and the requested 0. 11 increase in the floor area ratio. Sincerely, Dan Hinson. Project Architect ATTACHMENT 4 FOCUSED TRAFFIC STUDY (SELECTED SECTIONS ONLY) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\Griffins\345PA99.Holiday Inn Staff Report.doc 33 III I I OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS Exhibit S shows the ADT volumes which can be expected for Opening Year without project traffic conditions. Exhibit T shows the ADT volumes which can be expected for Opening Year with project traffic conditions. Opening Year intersection levels of service for the existing network without the proposed project are shown in Table 5. Table 5 shows HCM calculations based on the geometdcs' at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Opening Year without project HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix "D". Opening Year AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits U and V without the project, respectively. For Opening Year without project traffic conditions, the following study area intersection is projected to operate at Level of Service "F" dudng the PM peak hour, without improvements: Front Street (NS) at: · Rancho Califomia Road (EW) Opening Year intersection levels of service for the existing network with the proposed project am shown in Table 6. Table 6 shows HCM calculations based on the geometdcs at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Opening Year with project HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix "E". Opening Year AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits W and X with the project, respectively. For Opening Year with project traffic conditions, the following study area intersection is projected to operate at Level of Service "F" dudng the PM peak hour, without improvements: 6 Front Street (NS) at: · Rancho Califomia Road (EW) ' For Opening Year with project traffic conditions, study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or better dudng the peak hours with the improvements listed in Table 6. CONCLUSIONS Site-specific circulation and access recommendations are depicted on Exhibit Y. Median improvements along Front Street should provide for dght turns in/out and left turns in only (no left turns out) at the central project driveway. The central project driveway should also provide a northbound right turn lane for vehicles desiring to turn dght into the project site. The south project driveway to Front Street should be restricted to dght turns in/out only. Stop signs along with stop legends and stop bars should be installed at the access ddveways. Sight distance at each project driveway to Front Street should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans/City of Temecula sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. The project should participate on a pro-rata basis on funding city-wide traffic improvements based upon adopted City fee programs. If you have quest ons regarding this focussed traffic study not hesitate to call at (949) 474-0809. ' Sincerely, Senior Associate I Principal CB:JK:RK:skf/10065 JN:0914-99-01 Attachments 7 ITEM #6 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 15, 1999 Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0308; ADOPT Resolution No. 99- denying the appeal of Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) based upon the analysis and the Findings contained within the staff report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Illusionzone Inc, (Chuck R. Lacy) PROPOSAL: To operate an indoor skateboard park with optional use as a paintball arena in a 14,666 square foot portion of a building within an existing 26,161 square foot industrial builing. LOCATION: 42188 Rio Nedo GENERAL PLAN: BP Business Park (subject and surrounding) ZONING: LI Light Industrial (subject and surrounding) LAND USE: Subject: Industrial Building North: Vacant South: Industrial Building East: Industrial Building West: Industrial Building BACKGROUND On August 4, 1999, Chuck Lacy of the Illusionzone, Inc. applied for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to permit the operation of an indoor skateboard park with optional use as a paintball arena within an existing industrial building located at 42188 Rio Nedo, Unit A. A Design Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on August 26, 1999, at which time the Building and Safety F:\Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPTN308pa99.pc,dOc and Fire Departments expressed some concerns relative to the construction of the skateboard ramps and how they would comply with Fire and Building codes and the anticipated occupancy loads associated with the use. Once these issues were resolved, the project was scheduled for a Director's Hearing on October 21, 1999. At the Director's Hearing, two objections to this project were brought forward. One business owner (Howard Reimer) from across the street spoke in opposition. The second objection came as a letter from a trustee (R. Michael Wilkinson) of a property located four parcels away on the opposite side of the street. Both parties had concerns regarding the increased traffic and a lack of parking that would cause customers to park on their properties. The neighbor across the street was also concerned with the possibility of vandalism related to the draw of the youths to the area and the possible maring of property with paintballs. In response staff explained that the parking had been consider and that it was staff's conclusion that there would be sufficient parking and that the traffic generated would be less intensive than other use that could occupy his building. Staff also felt that many of the customers would be adolescence under the driving age and would be dropped off at the facility. In addition, to deal with any potential nuisances the applicant is conditioned to file a security plan with the police department. On November 2, 1999, R. Michael Wilkinson, and on November 3, 1999, Howard Reimer, filed formal appeals of the Planning Director's decision on this projects (See Attachment 2). Both parties had similar concerns and their cited justifications for the Appeal are addressed in this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project, Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit), is a request to operate an indoor skateboard park with optional use as a paintball arena. The applicant proposes to construct this indoor skateboarding facility/paintball arena within 14,666 square feet a 26,161 square foot industrial building on a 1.22 acre lot located at 42188 Rio Nedo, Unit A. Inside this facility will be offices, minor equipment sales, waitingNiew areas, and the arena. The proposed hours of operation for the project are Monday through Friday from 3:00 PM to 9:00 PM, Friday 2:00 PM to 11:00 PM, Saturday from 8:30 AM to 11:00 PM, and Sunday from 10:00 AM to 9:00 PM. The number of employees needed for the operation ranges from 3 to 5. ANALYSIS Site Description The building faces Rio Nedo with parking at the front and along one side and the rear property lines. Landscaping and all other site improvements are existing. Parking The Development Code parking requirements for skating rinks is one space per 1,000 square feet of lot area. Because project occupies slightly more than half of the building, staff calculated a need for 27 parking spaces. With the overall site having 48 spaces and reciprocal parking staff F:\Dep~sXPLANNING\STAFFRPTx308pa99.pc.doc 2 felt that limited hours of operation and the anticipated peak hours for this project would not conflict with other uses currently at this site or in the vicinity. Land Use Compatibility Issues The project site is located within a light industrial area with a number of industrial uses currently in operation. The zoning for the area allows a variety of manufacturing and warehousing activities as permitted uses. Skateboard parks, as listed in the development code in a Light Industrial zone, may have some special impact or a uniqueness that could effect its surroundings and are therefore, to be considered, as a conditionally permitted use. The project site is on the north side of Rio Nedo. Along this street are a variety of light industrial uses. At the Director's Hearing two property owners voiced concerns about the traffic associated this type of business and the existing traffic generated by the industrial businesses, They also had the perception that there would be lack of parking on the applicant site and his customers would be parking on the appellants' properties. APPEAL: Issue 1. Response: Issue 2. Response: Five primary issues were cited by the appellants as justification for denying both projects. This type of business will draw children to an industrial area where there are uses that store hazardous materials including a propane storage tank. The potential hazards are further magnified by the fact that there is an earthquake fault approximately 2,000 feet away. Light Industrial zoning permits a full range of industrial uses that would create conflicts with children or anyone else visiting or working in this area. The introduction of a recreational facility in this zone as a conditionally permitted use was reviewed carefully by staff. A 30,000 pound capacity propane tank is approximately 575 feet away from the skateboard arena. Staff considered the proximity of the propane tank and the likelihood of other chemical hazards in the surrounding businesses and believed that they did not pose a threat. After sending out the Public Hearing Noticing to all the property owners within a 600 foot radius, no one came forward to oppose this project on the merits that their operations would be hazardous to anyone in the area. With regard to the earthquake fault, it appears to be far enough away so as not to be of a major concern. The proposed Skateboard Park would increase traffic in an already busy industrial park. All businesses generate a certain level of traffic and this type of business will be no exception. However, staff calculated that the anticipated traffic generated by this proposal would be no greater than the multitude of other types of businesses that could utilize the same building space. Moreover, the peak traffic times for this business will be in the late afternoon and mid-evening on weeknights and all day on weekends when most industrial businesses are closed. Issue 3. Response: Truck traffic and a busy street versus children. The applicant for this project has expressed to staff that it will be his policy to have parents come inside to pick up their children so they are not hanging F:\DeptsXPLANNINGXSTAFFRPT~308pa99.pc.doc 3 Issue 4. Response: around outside. He also plans to install five video cameras outside of the building to further assure security and safety on his property. Furthermore, the applicant understands that his Conditional Use Permit can be revoked if compliance with the conditions is not maintained. Lack of parking and parking on neighboring properties. Staff reviewed the available parking on this site and the parking required for this type of use and found that the site had ample parking. This project is required to have 27 spaces. The site has 48 spaces with reciprocal parking, 30 of which, the applicant states, are assigned to the suite being used for the skateboard park. The majority of those utilizing the facility will be dropped off by a parent, therefore not continually occupying a parking space. In addition, the hours of operation and the anticipated peak hours for the use generally would not conflict with other uses currently in the vicinity. Staff believes it is not likely that customers at this facility will be parking on other sites. ENVIRONMENTAL The project qualifies under CEQA for a Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 Existing Facilities, Class I (b), because it is a minor alteration of an existing facility, involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, staff has reviewed the items cited by the appellants during their review and analysis of this project and found that this project was not likely to create conflicts with the other uses in the area. Staff. therefore, still stands by out original conclusions and recommends that the Planning Director's approval for this project be upheld. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission deny the appeals and uphold the approval of the Planning Director subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS The proposal, a skateboard and paintball arena, is a conditional use consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in Light Industrial (LI) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for consistency with these documents and Staff has determined that the project as conditioned is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code. 2. The proposed conditional use as conditioned can be considered compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. This project is located within an area of existing industrial uses at 42188 Rio Nedo. 3. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the project. Staff has reviewed the project and has determined that the project is consistent with the standards of the Development Code. F:\DeptS~PLANNING%STAFFRPTX308pa99.pc.d~c 4 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project as conditioned is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code. These documents were adopted by the City Council to assure that projects are is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Compliance with these documents will assure this is achieved. 5. The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Commission renders their decision. ATTACHMENTS: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. PC Resolution 99- - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10 Staff Report for the October 21, 1999 Director's Hearing - Blue Page 15 Minutes from the October 21, 1999 Director's Hearing - Blue Page 16 Correspondence (letters of opposition) - Blue Page 17 1 .t Notice of Appeal (Wilkinson) - Blue Page 18 2nd Notice of Appeal (Reimer) - Blue Page 19 Correspondence (Applicant'S response to appeal) - Blue Page 20 Exhibits - Blue Page 21 A, Vicinity Map B, General Plan Map C. Zoning Map F:\Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRPTX308pa99 .pc.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-.__ F:\Depts~PLANNING\STAFFRPTx308pa99.pc,doc 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0308, (MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0308, (MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) A REQUEST TO OPERATE AN INDOOR SKATEBOARD PARK WITH PAINTBALL ARENA WITHIN A 14,666 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF A BUILDING WITHIN AN EXISTING BUSINESS PARK, LOCATED AT 42188 RIO NEDO, UNIT A, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-254-006. WHEREAS, Chuck Lacy with Illusionzone Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) which is in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Director considered Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) on October 21, 1999 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Director's Hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Director approved Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit); WHEREAS, Appeals were filed on October 28~h and 29th, 1999 requesting that Planning Application No. PA99-0308 be brought before the City Planning Commission for their consideration; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit - Appeal) on December 15, 1999, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to Planning Applications No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit - Appeal); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Director's proceedings were resented with a Staff Reports regarding Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit); Section 1, That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit - Appeal) and upholding the Planning Director's decision approving PA99~0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Chapter 17.04: F:\DeptS\PLANNING~STAFFRPTx308pa99.pC,dOC 7 A. The proposal, a skateboard and paintball arena, is a conditional use consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in Light Industrial (LI) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for consistency with these documents and Staff has determined that the project as conditioned is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code. B. The proposed conditional use as conditioned can be considered compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. This project is located within an area of existing industrial uses at 42188 Rio Nedo. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the project. Staff has reviewed the project and has determined that the project is consistent with the standards of the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project as conditioned is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code. These documents were adopted by the City Council to assure that projects are is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Compliance with these documents will assure this is achieved. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project qualifies under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for a Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 Existing Facilities, Class 1 (b), because it is a minor alteration of an existing facility, involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing. Section 4. Conditions, That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) to allow the operation an indoor skateboard park with paintball arena within a 14,666 square foot portion of a building at 42188 Rio Nedo. Unit A .. and subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. F:\Depts~LANNING~STAFFRPT~308pa99.pC.dOC 8 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15t" day of December, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of December, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary F:\Dept~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~308pa99.pc.doc 9 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL F:\Depts\FLANNING\STAFFPJ'Tx308pa99.pc.doc EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Conditional Use Permit- Illusionzone) Project Description: A proposal to install a skateboard arena with the optional use as a paintball arena occupying 14,666 square feet of a 26,161 square foot industrial building on a 1.22 acre lot located at 42188 Rio Nedo, Unit A. Development Impact Fee Category: Service Commercial Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 909-254-006 December 15, 1999 December 15, 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty- eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA99-0266 (Minor Conditional Use Permit), City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by the approval. F:\Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~308pa99,pc,doc I1 The conversion of use shall conform substantially with Exhibit "A" (Site Plan) and Exhibit "B" (Floor Plan) approved with Planning Application No. PA99-0308, or as amended by these conditions. Any future expansion of this conditional use activity into other areas of this building beyond Unit A shall require that this Minor Conditional Use Permit be amended and approved by the Planning Manager. Noise levels generated by the project shall not exceed the standards set forth in the Noise Element of the General Plan or the environmental performance standards of the Development Code. Prior to opening for business, a security plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Police Department for review and approval. Said plan shall include, but not be limited to staffing, security rules and regulations, operating policies, emergency protocols and twenty-four hour contact personnel. The project shall comply with Conditions of Approval of all underlying maps, development plans or Conditional Use Permits that may apply to the project site. Hours of operation will be from 3:00 pm to 9:00pro Monday through Thursday and 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm on Friday, 8:30 am to 11:00 pm Saturday, and 10:00am to 9:00 pm on Sunday. Any variation from these operating hours for seasonal changes or special events shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Manager for approval prior to going into effect. (Modified at the Director's Hearing 10121199) BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 9. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 10. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 11. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 12. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 13. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be A-2.1/B unless the occupancy load is calculated at less that 300 persons than the classification is A-3/B. 14. Provide Occupancy approvals for all existing buildings (i.e. finale building permits or Certificate of Occupancy) 15. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 16. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 17. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. F:\Depts~PLANNINGXSTAFFRt'Tx308pa99.pc,doc 12 18. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code, 19. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 20. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 21. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 22. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE DEPARTMENT 23. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 24. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Eli-A) 25. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 26. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty4our (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 27. 28. 29. F:\DeptS\PLANNING\STAFFR~T'x308pa99,pC.dOC 13 30. Prior to issuance of Cedificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 31. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4) 32. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 33. Prior to building final, ramps shall be in compliance with the technical report referenced in letter to you dated October 14, 1999. 34. Prior to using any paint balls, call our office for a special inspection to review the procedures and protection of sprinkler heads, exit signs, and emergency lights. OTHER AGENCIES 35. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Police Department's transmittal of September 20, 1999, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval, I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval, Applicant's Signature Date Name printed F:\DeptS~PLANNYNG~STAFFRP'I~308pa99.pc.doC 14 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING DATED OCTOBER 21, 1999 F:\DeptS~PLANNING~STAFFRP'I~308pa99.pc.doc PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) is a request for approval to permit the operation of an indoor skateboard park with optional use as a paintball arena. In accordance with the City's Development Code, Chuck Lacy of the Illusionzone, Inc. has applied for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow an indoor skateboarding facility/paintball arena within a 9,726 square feet a 26,161 square foot industrial building located at 42188 Rio Nedo, UnitA. The project qualifies under CEQA for a Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 Existing Facilities, Class 1 (b), because it is a minor alteration of an existing facility, involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing. No structural changes to the exterior of the building are being proposed as a result of this project. Minor improvements are noted on the floor plans and will require separate building permits. The parking requirements were reviewed for this proposal with the determination that the amount of parking required for this project and the parking available for the center which the project is located is sufficient. At this time no one has contacted the Planning Department regarding this project. Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Director approve Planning Application No. PA99o 0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit), based upon the findings and the attached Conditions of Approval. This concludes Staff's presentation. Staff is available to answer any questions. F:\Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\308pa99 DH.doc FINDINGS Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) 1. The proposal, a skateboard and paintball arena, is a conditional use consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in Light Industrial (LI) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for consistency with these documents and Staff has determined that the project as conditioned is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code. 2. The proposed conditional use as conditioned can be considered compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. This project is located within an area of existing industrial uses at 42188 Rio Nedo. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the project. Staff has reviewed the project and has determined that the project is consistent with the standards of the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project as conditioned is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code. These documents were adopted by the City Council to assure that projects am is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Compliance with these documents will assure this is achieved. F:\Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\308pa99 DH.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING DATED OCTOBER 21, 1999 F:\DcptS~PLANNING\STAFFRPTX308pa99.pc.doc 16 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR OCTOBER 21, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Director was called to order on Thursday, October 21, 1999 at 1:30 PM, at the City of Temecula Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Senior Planner Matthew Fagan presiding. Also present were Project PIarmer Thomas Thornsley, Chief Building Official Tony Elmo and Minute Clerk Cathy Davis. Senior Planner Matthew Fagan opened the public hearing for items not listed on the agenda at 1:45 PM. There were no requests to speak. 1. Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit~ Project Planner presented the staff report for Planning Application PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) to operate an indoor skateboard park with optional use as a paintball arena occupying 14,666 square feet of a 26,161 square foot industrial building location at 42188 Rio Nero, Suite A. Senior Planner Matthew Fagan opened the public hearing at 1:50 PM Howard L. Reimer, 27600 Sunday Drive, Temecula, CA, spoke in opposition to the project. He o~vns property at 42217 Rio Nedo. He was concemed with parking and traffic. Also, he was concerned with kids loitering in the parking lot. Condition 8 was changed to state the hours of operation 3:00 PM to 9:00 PM on weekdays. Applicant Chuck Lacy, 24250 Mirasol Way, Temecula CA concurred with the revised Conditions of Approval. Applicant Chuck Lacy also stated that kids would not be allowed to loiter in the parking lot and there is a lounge in the facility for them to wait for their parents. Senior Planner Matthew Fagan closed the public hearing at 2:00 PM. Senior Planner Matthew Fagan adopted the categorical exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) and approved the project subject to the Findings and revised Conditions of Approval. The meeting was adjourned at 2:03 P.M. ~~anner \\TEMEC_FSI01\VOLIXDepts\PLANNING\DIR,HEAR\MINUTESH999\i0.21.99.doc i ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CORRESPONDENCE (LE'R'ERS OF OPPOSITION) F:\Depts~PLANNING\STAFFRPTx308pa99,pc.doc L!~rsday October 21, 19~ 12:19;. -- Fr(xr '/~ 403 8733, -- Page 2~ ' Sent By: R.MICHAEL WILIGNSON,PR,..CORP.; 626 403 6733; Oct-~ -99 1 ;O4PM; Page 2/2 WILKESSON TRUST 991 89~ 1~1 ('-,,fro 9a',-~. Suite ~1 ~ P~d~ ~ 91030 · ~ (~) Odober 21, 1999 V'm Facsimile No, (909} 694-6477 Mr. Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner City of Temecula, Main Conference Room 43200 Business Park Drive Tamecula, CA 92590 RE: Pinning Application No, PA99-0308 (Minor COndffional Use Permit) Dear Mr. Thomsley: I am the Trustee of the Wilkinson Trust 991, the owner of the properties located at 42355 and 42381 Rio Nedo, Temecula, California. This letter shall constitute my formal objection to Planning Applicalion Number PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit), fie hearing on which will be held today at 1:30 D.m. I believe the Planning Application should be de~ied because of the increased ~aff~ and lack of parking that will be created it the Conditional Use PaTnit is granted. The nature of the Applicant's busjness will attract a large number of customers into this area. I am also concsmed that the parldng fadl'ffies for my buildings will be used by the customers of the Applicant. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. VeW t~uly youre, Ivtjd4, Wcll ' -m4 R. MICHAEL WILKINSON RMW:jcI ATTACHMENT NO. 5 FIRST NOTICE OF APPEAL (WILKINSON) F:~DeptsXPLANNINGI,STAFFRPTX308pa99.pc.doc Wilkinson Trust 991 899 E1 Centro Street, Suite 201 South Pasadena, CA 91030 Telephone (626) 403-0101 Fax (626) 403-8733 November 2, 1999 Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning City of Temecula Community Development Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: Notice of Al~l~eal - Plannin~ AI31~lication No. PA 99-0308 Dear Mr. Thornhill, Enclosed please find our Notice of Appeal for Planning Application No. PA 99- 0308, along with our check in the amount of $351.00, in payment of the filing fee. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed, or if you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (626) 403-0101. Very truly yours, R. MICHAEL WILKINSON, TRUSTEE RMW:sw Enclosure City of Temecula 432~)h~Inas hrk Drive * Ternscala , CA · 92S~ ' 1~.O. Box ~B3, Temecnh · CA o 92S~ 6~ 694-6400 * FAX {909) 6~,-6477 Appea PLANNING RPPLICATTON NO. PA 99-0308 A, FIFRPf]~F, 71aclx3xIx~oft~at~att~'--~'J-ureiswpi,~vlde a medal of recourse for persons agr~L-vcd by or with an action tM~,~ by an admlni~altlive ag~-y of tl~ City in the admini.ma~0n or B. F~XNOR~QUmm~m~S 1. 2. Appeal 3. F~ngFee. C. NfJl'lC~. OF ~]~qAl.- TIME r~vFrr t~_lex-~,_rday~afi~aercktofwzittellno6ceoft, hedecisiDIL (15) D. NOTICF. OF APF~AL - COIN'fhNTS Al:rp~ling fi~ decision of: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ~C~y:Xa~Jy what hb~ng~ea]~d: The granting of a Minor Conditional Use Permit to Chuck Lacy for the operalion ~f Park with optional use as a Paintball Arena. Rea~marjusa~:afiontosu]31aorttheal~e~. Appdlantmus~submjtwiffifi'~sappesie~chhauewhich the appellant alleges was wx~ugly de~,~ined to~ wifia eve~ agreement and a '-~-TY of ev~y i~'m of evidence. (Auach sq~ara~ =hee~ of p~aper i~ SEE ATTACHED STATEMENT Reconsideration of the decision taken in this matter. The A~pellant requests that the application for a Minor Conditional Use Permit be denied. STATEMENT OF APPEAL At the outset, please note that the Appellant has not yet received a written notice of the decision in this matter. It is the Appellant's contention that the Director of Planning granted the application for a Minor Conditional Use Permit in error. The proposed use of the applicant's property for a skateboard park and/or paintball arena will undoubtedly attract a great deal of children to the area. This use is not compatible with the existing industrial and manufacturing uses in the area. The existing uses include manufacturing operations and the storage of hazardous chemicals. In fact, there is a business located on Rio Nedo that is approximately 576 feet from the applicant's property, which maintains a propane tank containing 30,000 pounds of propane gas. This environmental and safety risk is greatly magnified by the fact that there is an earthquake fault line approximately 2,000 feet away. A skateboard park, which will attract children, creates an unnecessary safety risk, and should not be located in such an industrial area. Furthermore, the area is serviced by a number of large trucks. These trucks, along with the increased traffic from the Applicant's proposed use, will have a negative impact on the traffic patterns in the area. Moreover, the heavy truck traffic is incompatible with a skateboard park. Children loitering, walking and playing in the area are an accident waiting to happen. Finally, there is the fact that there is a lack of parking for the proposed skateboard park. Even if parents come in to the area to pick up and drop off their children, they will need a place to park while they wait. Consequently, the parents will probably end up parking at the adjacent properties, and interfering with their businesses. In summary, the Applicant's proposed use of a skateboard park and/or paintball arena is incompatible with the surrounding manufacturing and industrial uses. Therefore, the Applicant's request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit should be denied. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 SECOND NOTICE OF APPEAL (REIMER) F:\DeptsXPLANNING\STAFFRPTX308pa99.pc.doc City of Temecula Community Development Department 43200 Business Park Drive · Temecuh · CA, 92590 P.O. Box 9033, Temecula · CA , 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 · FAX (909) 694-6477 Appeal Original Case Numbel'(s) A. PURPOSE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0308 The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code. B. FILING REQUTREMENTS 1. Development AppLication. 2. Appeal Form. 3. Filing Fee. C. NOTICE OF APPEAl. - TIME lIMIT A notice of an appeal by any individual Who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirenent, decision or determination shall not be acted upon unless filed within fifteen (15) calendar days aftex service of written notice of the decision. D. NOTICE OF APPEAL - CONTErCT~ Appealing the decision of: DIRECTOR 0F PLANNING (Spe~if~ ~tor Ofplannitlg Or planning Commilsiol AND A~tioll Dat~) Speci~ cxac~y what is being appealed: to a Mr. Chuck Lacey for arena. A minor conditional use permit the use of a Skateboard park/paint ball Reason or justification to support the appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal each issue which the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of ever~ item of e~dence. (Attach sepam~ sh~t of paper ff necessary). Rio-Nedo is a heavily trafficked businesses here. Employee parking becomes a street, due to many smaller problem due to limited parking of these businesses. Therefore, most employees park on the street which creates a serious hazard for trucks unloading their merchandise- Double parking then becomes another serious problem. I have witness this many times from my building. My property has already become a parking area for these employees with limited space in other businesses. Bringing more traffic, children and young drivers into Desired actiontobetaken: A TRAFFIC an area with a extremely STUDY OR DENIAL OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant shall be allowed five (5) calendar days in which to reftle the notice of appeal. high traffic count would just magnify the problem that already exists. Please consider my appeal on this hazardous situation. HOWARD REIMER 27600 Sunday Drive Temecula, Calif 92590 ph~ 676-2750 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 CORRESPONDENCE (APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO APPEAL) F:\DeptS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~308pa99.pC.doc 20 November 10, 1999 Mr. Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Thomas, 42188 Rio Nedo Unit A Temecula, Ca 92590 (909) 694-6943 I am writing this letter to you in regards to the two appeals that have been filed on our project. I would like to address the issues brought up by Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Reirner. The issue in the statement of appeal is that there are hazardous chemicals near our facility. We have looked extensively at the surrounding businesses and to the best of our knowledge determined that this is not an issue .The propane that is stored down the street from us is not a hazardous chemical. The earthquake fault lines mentioned in the statement are just that-a fault line. As to traffic and parking our policy is only to allow up to 50 skaters maximum in each skate session. This is for safety as well as not having over crowded floors to skate on. So if every one that came brought one friend and the average session had 22 people and 90 % were dropped off by their parents that means them would be 20 car trips every 2 hours (10 to drop off & 10 to pick up) starting at 3:00pm and ending at 9:00pm in the evening, long after everyone has gone home for the day. We feel that them would be much more traffic on the street if this were a manufacturing facility like the one that was in the building last year, which had over 100 employees. The issue is that there will be more traffic brought in to the area. The average age of our patrons is fifteen, after visiting numerous indoor skate parks and talking with their owners we determined that 90% of our visitors will be dropped off by their parents and that also they usually bring one or more friends. We have mere then adequate parking for this type of facility there are 48 parking spots in our parking area. The majodty of our open hours are after most businesses are closed and on weekends when they are not open. As to loitering and playing in the area we have a lounge area planned with TV and games to keep people inside until they are picked up. Part of our rules are that there will be no loitering in the outside area and if any of our members are caught breaking the rules they can have their membership pulled and can be banned from our facility. We plan to set up 5 cameras outside that will be recording 24 hours a day 7 days a week along with being monitored during open hours by our staff. As you know our security plan has been approved by the Temecula Police Department. If you have any questions or need other information please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you, President, CEO Illusionzone, Inc. jpv cc: Betty S.N. Auton, Attorney at Law EXHIBITS F:\DeptSNPLANNING\STAFFRPTX308pa99.pC.dOC Dtstrlcl Office: CITY OF TEMECULA · Courthouse ZII' CODE 92591 Temecula Showgrounds CHP ZI? CODE zastern 92590 · Water Dist DMV Business CASE NO. - PA99-0309 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - DECEMBER 15, 1999 VICINITY MAP \\TEMEC_FSIOl\VOLI\DeptS\PLANNINGXSTAFFRPTx308pa99.pc dec 22 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B DESIGNATION - LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING MAP f: EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION - BP BUSINESS PARK CASE NO. - PA99-0309 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE-DECEMBER 15, 1999 GENERAL PLAN \\TEMEC FSI01\VOLl\DeptShoLANNING\STAFFRpTX308pa99.pC.dOc 23 In compliance with the Americans with Dbabllktss Act, If you need special asdstance to learliclpate In this rneeUng, pleaam contact the office of the Community Development Depamnt at (909) 8~4-8400. NotMtcatlon 4~ hours prior to a meeting will enable the CIty to make reasonable arrangements to ensue accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December f5, f999 @ 6:00 PM 43200 Business Park Drive Council Chambere Temecule, CA 92590 Resolution Next In Order #99-052 CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE: ROLL CALL: Chaiq~erson Guerriero Fahey, Guerriero, Mathewson, and Webster PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can eddress the commissioners on items that are not tisted on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item no._~t listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" fo~ must be filed with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda ACTION: APPROVED 4-0 Director's Hearing Update ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE Criteria for Determining Public Convenience or Necessity Finding for Alcohol Serving Uses ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Adion: Planner. Recommendation: ACTION: Planning Application No. PA99-0378 (Development Plan and Condi6onal Use Permit) Satum Corporation East side of Ynez Road, south of Solana Way (Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809) To design, censtrud and operate a 12,825 square foot Satum automobile dealership with associated automobile display and storage areas on 2.6f acres planned and zoned for SC Service Commercial use Exempt Steve Griffin Approval APPROVED 4-0 RESO 99-052 R:\WIMBERVG\PLANCOI~dVI\AGENDAS\I999\I2-15-99.doc 5. Case No: Applicant: Location: Pmposat: Environmental Action: Project Planner: Recommendation: ACTION: 6. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner:. Recommendation: ACTION: PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) VCL Construction East side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho Califomia Road (podions of Parcels 1, 2, 3 & 6 of Parcel Map 23882) Construct a 137-room, 59,950 square foot, 3--story Holiday Inn Express Hotei on 3.37 acres planned and zoned for HT Highway/Tourist commemiat use Exempt Steve Griffin Approval CONTINUED TO JANUARY 5, 2000 Planning Application No. PA99-0308 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) Illusionzone, Inc., Chuck Lacy 42188 Rio Nedo, Suite. A The operation of an indoor Skateboard Pank with optional use as a Paintball Arena occupying 14,666 square feet of a 26,161 square foot industrial building. This project is Categorically Exempt from further evaluation under CEQA Section 15301 (Existing Facititiss). Thomas Thomsfey Approval APPEAL FROM DIRECTOR'S HEARING APPROVED 3-t, FAHEY DENIED RESO 99-053 January 5, 2000, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590 R:\WIMBERVG\PLANCOMM\AGENDAS%I999\I2-15-99.do~ 2