HomeMy WebLinkAbout020200 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to pafficipate in this
meeting, please contact the office ofthe City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting
will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR
35.102.35.104 ADA T'~tle II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
FEBRUARY 2, 2000 - 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2000-007
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
Commissioner Webster
Fahey, Mathewson, Webster, Guerriero
The Swearing in of the Newly Appointed Planning Commissioner - John Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that am listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no_.Jt on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary pdor to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
F:~DEPTS%PLANNING%PLANCOMM~AgendaS~000%2-2-00.doc
1
I Approval of Aaenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of February 2, 2000.
2 Findina of Public Convenience or Necessity for the Health Zone Natural Foods Store,
located at 41915 Motorcar Parkway, Suite A-C, at the northesast comer of Ynez Road
and Solaria Way
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Support Finding of Convenience or Necessity
3 Reauest to Rescind Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 24126, Newland Communities,
located north of De Portola, east of Maraadte, west of Butterfield Staae and south of
Leena Way
RECOMMENDATION
3.1 Approve
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
4 Planning3 Application No. PA99-0382 (Lar~3e Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance~
Citywide ordinance amendinQ the Development Code - Senior Planner Dave Hoaan
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF THE
TITLE 17 RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE
FAMILY DAY CARE HOME FACITIIES" (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA99-0382)
F:%DEPTS%PLANNING%PLANCOMM~,gendas~2000%2-2-00.doc
2
5
Plannine Application No. PA99-0394 (Development Plan/Conditional Use Perrnitl, located
on the east side of Ynez Road south of W'~nchestar Rood between the two mall entrances
- Proiect Planner Thomas Thomslev
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA99-03!ki A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,311 SQUARE FOOT CAR
WASH (CAR SPA) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A
CONVENIENCE MARKET/GAS STATION AND A 1,514
SQUARE FOOT LUBE SHOP, ON A 1.93 ACRE LOT LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN THE TWO
ENTRANCES TO THE PROMENADE MALL SOUTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
910-320-039 & 040 AND LOTS P AND Q OF LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495 AND PARCEL MERGER PA99-0007
5.2
Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0394 (Conditional
Use Permit/Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a
project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously oortitled
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Request for 1999 Results of Quarterly ABC Juvenile Decoy Programs
Presentation on the Lennar Tour to Orange County
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 16, 2000, 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
F:~DEPTS~PLANNINGM=LANCOMM%Agenda$~OOO%2-2-00.dOC
3
ITEM #2
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
February 2. 2000
Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for the Health Zone Natural Foods Store,
located at 41915 Motorcar Parkway, Suites A-C, at the northeast comer of Ynez
Road and Solana Way
Prepared by: Camle Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner
EXISTING ZONING:
Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Community Commercial (CC) and Service Commercial (CC)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATIONS:
North: Service Commercial (SC)
South: Service Commercial (SC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Service Commercial (SC)
BACKGROUND
The Health Zone Natural Foods Store is requesting the Planning Commission make a public
convenience or necessity finding in order to sell beer and wine in their retail store at the community
shopping center located at the northeast comer of Ynez Road and Solana Way. This finding is
required because the applicant is requesting a Type #20 (Off-Sale General Retail) license from the
Califomia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) within a census tract where the number
of licenses issued has already been exceeded.,
ANALYSIS
The Planning Commission has developed cdteda to either justify or not justify making a finding of
Public Convenience or Necessity pursuant to State Law. These criteria and staffs preliminary
responses are as follows:
Criteria to JustiN Makin{:l a Findincl of Public Convenience or Necessity
Q:
Does the proposed establishment have any unique features which are not found in other
similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other special services)?
A: Yes. Health Zone Natural Foods Store offers a complete selection of organic produce,
natural and organic bulk and packaged foods, refrigerated and frozen foods, vitamins, herbal
supplements, and literature devoted to the attainment of health and well-being. They will offer
only certified organically grown beer and wine, and are the only source in Southem Riverside
County for a selection of these products. Therefore, their business fills a market niche not
currently occupied by other license holders in the City.
Q.'
Does the proposed estab~shment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a
different socio-economic class)?
Yes. While the Health Zone is expected to serve all socio-economic classes, it is the
destination of health conscious patrons with a particular interest in their approach to a
healthy diet. In catedng to this unique group of individuals, the store does not carry a wide
array of alcoholic beverage products, but rather specialty beer and wines that are priced
accordingly. Organic produce is available elsewhere in the City but in small quantities and
with a limited selection.
Q.'
Does the proposed establishment provide entertainment that would fill a niche in the
community (i.e. a comedy dub, jazz dub, etc.)
In this case this cdteria is not applicable. The Health Zone is not associated with
entertainment.
Q;
Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in
conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other
estabfishments in the area ?
A: No. Sales are anticipated to be typical of market operations.
Q;
Am thers any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or trsffic barriers (i.e. freeways,
major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other
establishments ?
Yes. The community shopping center in which the Health Zone is located is bordered by
major roadways, on the south by Solaria Way, and on the west by Ynez Road. Ovedand
Drive separates this center from the commercial hub at Winchester Road. Furthermore, the
center is surrounded by auto dealerships that comprise the Temecula Auto Mall.
Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of
population during certain seasonal periods?
No. Population in the area is expected to be seasonally stable, but increasing as the
adjacent multi-family residential areas, the regional mall, and the balance of the auto mall
continue to attract development.
Cdteda to Not Justify Makincl a Findina of Public Convenience or Necessity
Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the proposed
establishment?
Yes. The site lies within Distdct 432-04, and according to the Alcohol Beverage Control
office in Riverside, there are twenty (20) off-sale licenses allowed in this census tract, and
thirty-two (32) currently active licenses issued. However, within a quarter mile radius of the
Health Zone, there are only two off-sale licenses, one issued to the Shell gas station mini-
mart and the other to Michael's Market, both in the same commercial center.
According to the applicant's representative, the census tract ratios are misleading. District
F:~DEpTS'~LANHING',STAFFRFr~i~IthZone. ALC.doc
2
Q;
a:
Q:
432.04 covers an inordinately large area, encompassing nearly all of the City as well as
Redhawk, Vail and the De Luz areas (see Exhibit D). The number of licenses allowed is
based upon the number of residents, and these areas have experienced an explosion of
growth since the 1990 census statistics. The City currently reports a population of 48,828
(without Redhawk, Vail and De Luz) while the 1990 census tract figure is 27,599. The
applicant contends that the allowable number of licenses should be a minimum of 42 (at the
current rate of one license per every 1,400 residents).
Are them any sensitive uses (i.e., schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity (600
feet) to the proposed establishment?
No, there are no schools, parks, hospitals, churches or youth facilities within 600 feet of the
proposed establishment.
Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses?
No.
Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their proparty by the
residents of the area?
It is unlikely that the proposed market will interfere with residents east of the area.
Residences are beyond 500 feet of the community commercial center, in which other
licensees are currently operating.
Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area?
Staff contacted the Temecula Police Department regarding the proposed liquor license.
Police officers have no objections and anticipate that the proposed sale of organically-
produced beer and wine at the market will not add substantially to law enforcement problems
in the area.
Number of similar uses within the Ci~ There are nineteen licenses issued to grocery establishments
within the City limits, however, none of them offer health foods.
Number of other licensed establishments within 1 mile and 3 miles: There are 16 licensed retail
stores with alcohol sales within one mile of the proposed market. A three mile radius would include
a forty (40) licenses.
Conclusion: Staff recommends the Commission determine that the project proposes a certain
benefit by offering a product not otherwise available in the City.
Attachments:
Exhibits - Blue Page 5
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Vicinity Map
Zoning Map
General Plan
Census Tracts
Licenses within % mile and I mile radii
Licenses within % mile, 1 mile and 3 mile radii
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
EXHIBITS
CITY OF TEMECULA
ect Site
CASE NUMBER: Health Zone Natural Foods Store
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - FEBRUARY 2, 2000
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
CASE NUMBER: Health Zone Natural Foods Store
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - FEBRUARY 2, 2000
ITEM #3
VERBALPRESENTATION
NEWLAND
COMMUNITIES
December 15, 1999
· "' 17 7999
Chairman and Members of the
Planning Commission
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: Reconsideration of Tentative Tract No. 24136,
Amendment No. 2
Dear Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission:
On November 17, 1999, the Planning Commission considered
and approved Planning Commission Application No. PA99-
0296 ("Application"), Tentative Tract Map No. 24136,
Amendment No. 2 ("Tract Map"). The Application was filed
by Paseo Partners, LLC as the buyers of the property subject
to the Tract Map (the "Property") owned by Newland
Communities. Newland was in escrow to sell the Property to
Paseo Partners and had consented to the filing of the
Application.
At the time the Planning Commission had the Application
under review, the Temecula City Council was considering
Amendment No. 7, Specific Plan No. 219 to provide, among
other things, for a senior housing project to be developed in
the Specific Plan area including the Property. For reasons not
totally known to Newland, Paseo Partners decided not to
acquire the Property subject to the Tract Map, Amendment
No. 2 and not proceed with the senior housing project.
Newland did not know of these changed circumstances when
the Planning Commission approved Tract Map.
Based on the actions of Paseo Partners, Newland
Communities as the owner of the Property is respectfully
requesting the Planing Commission to reconsider the Tract
Map and repeal their actions in approving Amendment No.
2. With the approval of Amendment No. 7 to Specific Plan
No. 219 by the City Council on November 16, 1999, the
implementing zoning standards for a senior community are
now a part of Specific Plan No. 219. Therefore, a senior
development project could occur on this Property if another
merchant builder buys the land from Newland and proposed
to build a senior project.
Your positive action on this request will be appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~en~s~L Newland C~~meralifornia
JMD:kz
cc: Dennis O'Neil
Dean Meyer
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
FebmaW 2, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0382
(Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance)
Prepared By: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a PC Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF
TITLE 17 RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY
CARE HOME FACILITIES" (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0382)
BACKGROUND
This item was previously considered by the Planning Commission on August 18, 1999. At that meeting,
the Commission requested that staff bdng this issue back at a later date with additional information. The
previous Development Code amendment proposed to further differentiate between small and large
family day care home facilities, provided a detailed process about how the large fadlities would be
reviewed and approved, and dadfled who had the authority to approve the facilities. This staff report
has been revised to provide the Commission with three different approaches on how to address Large
Family Day Care Home Facilities.
ANALYSIS
Because of the importance of providing home-based child care fadlities, the State legislature prescribes
how local governments can regulate these facilities. Specifically, Section 1597.46 of the Health and
Safety Code dictates that the City can deal with Large Family Day Care Homes in any of three ways,
A copy of the Health and Safety Code Sections regulating Large Family Day Care Home Facilities is
contained in Attachment No. 3. The three approaches to regulating Large Family Day Care Homes are
as follows:
Classify them as a permitted use and require no additional permits. A draft Ordinance to
implement this option is contained in Exhibit A-1 of Attachment No. 2.
Grant a non-discretionary permit for property zoned for single-family residential uses that
complies with reasonable local standards such as parking, spacing and concentration, traffic
control, and noise. A draft Ordinance to implement this option is contained in Exhibit A-2 of
Attachment No. 2.
R:\ORDINANCES'd_ARGE FAMILY DAY CAREt382PA99 PC.doc
1
Issue a permit after a public notice has been provided to all property owners within 100 feet
of the exterior property lines of the subject property within 10 days of an application, The
notice would state that the City would issue a permit for a Large Family Day Care Home
Facility unless a request for a headng is filed with the City. A draft Ordinance to implement
this option is contained in Exhibit A-3 of Attachment No. 2.
The draft Ordinance also includes a provision that in any residential zone, large family day care
home facilities shall be separated by at least 300 feet and, if they are located on the same street,
be separated by at least 600 feet from any other facility.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff prepared an Initial Environmental Study for the proposed Development Code amendment and
is recommending that a Negative Declaration by approved for Planning Application PA99-0382.
Attachments:
2
3.
4.
PC Resolution No. 2000- - Blue Page 3
Proposed Ordinances - Blue Page 5
Excerpts of the Health and Safety Code - Blue Page 9
Initial Study - Blue Page 12
R:~ORDINANCES~LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE%382PA99 PC,~oc
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
R:~ORDINANCES~LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE~382PA99 PC.doc
3
A'R'ACHMENT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-,._
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE
SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17 RELATING TO THE
STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME FACILITIES
(PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0382)
WHEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, On January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Citys
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library.
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on February 2, 2000, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in suppod or opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE
SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17 RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY
CARE HOME FACILITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0382)" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY
IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of January,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~ORDINANCES~,ARGE FAMILY DAY CARELt82PA99 PC.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCES
R:\ORDINANCES',LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE~382PA99 PC.doc
5
EXHIBIT A-1
PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR APPROACH NO. I
R:%ORDINANCES'~..ARGE FAMILY DAY CARE%382PA99 PC.doc
6
EXHBIT A-1
ORDINANCE 2000-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17
RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE
HOME FACILITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0382)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Table 17.06.030, the listings for Family day care homes are hereby amended
to read as follows:
.....
Description of Use
Family day care homes - small
Family day care homes - large
Table 17.06.030
Residential Districts
HR
P
P
VL
P
P
L-1 L-2 LM M
P P P P
P P P P
H
P
P
SECTION 2. Footnote 1 to Table 17.06.030 is hereby deleted.
SECTION 3. Subsection 17.06.050.J.6 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall cartif,/to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full forca and effect thirty (30) days after its passage;
and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers
voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be posted as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of ,2000.
ATTEST:
Jeff Stone, Mayor
F:%Depts~LANNING\Ordinances~,..arge Family Day CareLt82PA99 *Appr~ch 1 .doc
1
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 2000- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of , 2000 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day
of ,2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
F:~Depts~LANNING\OrdinancesM_arge Family Day Caret382PA99 -Approach 1 .doc
2
EXHIBIT A-2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR APPROACH NO. 2
R:~DRDINANCESU,.,ARGE FAMILY DAY CARE~382PA99 PC.doc
7
EXHBIT A-2
ORDINANCE 2000-.__
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17
RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE
HOME FACILITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0382)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Table 17.06.030, the listings for Family day care homes are hereby
amended to read as follows:
Description of Use
Family day care homes - smalll
Family day care homes -- large1
Table 17.06.030
Residential Districts
HR VL L-1
P P P
P P P
.T
L-2 ! LM M H
P P P P
P P P P
SECTION 2. Footnote I to Table 17.06.030 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"1. No additional permit is required, all Family day care home facilities are subject to the provisions
of Section 17.06.050.J."
SECTION 3. Section 17.06,050.J is hereby amended to read as follows:
Family Day Care Home Design Standards. All day care facilities shall be state
licensed and shall be operated according to all applicable State and local health and
safety regulations. Day care facilities shall be developed in the following manner:
The facility shall comply with all land use regulations and site development
standards of the zoning distdct in which it is located.
In all residential zoning districts and planning areas, large day care facilities
(seven or more children) shall not be located within three hundred feet of
another large day care facility or within six hundred feet of another large
family day care facility that is located on the same street.
An outdoor play area shall be located in the rear yard area. Stationary play
equipment shall not be located in required side and front yards. The outdoor
play areas shall be securely located and appropriately landscaped.
A six-foot high solid decorative fence or wall shall be constructed on all
property lines, except in the front yard. Materials, textures, colors, and design
of the fence or wall shall be compatible with on-site and adjacent properties.
All fences and walls shall provide for safety with controlled points of entry.
All on-site lighting shall be stationary, directed away from adjacent properties
and public rights-of-way, and of an intensity appropriate to the use it is
FADepts%PLANNING\Ordinances~Large Family Day Care~382PA99 -Appreach 2.dec
1
serving."
SECTION 4. Severabilitv. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage;
and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers
voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be posted as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of ,2000.
ATTEST:
Jeff Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 2000- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of , 2000 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day
of ,2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1 ~Depts~PLANNING~Ordinances~Large Famiiy Day Care~382PA99 -Approach 2.d~c
2
EXHIBIT A.-3
PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR APPROACH NO. 3
R:\ORDINANCES%LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE'G82PA99 PC,doc
8
EXHIBIT A-3
ORDINANCE 2000-___
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECUI_A, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17
RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE
HOME FACILITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-O382)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 17.06.050.J of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"J. Family Day Care Home Facilities.
Small family day cam home radiities, as defined in Chapter 3.4, Division 2 of
the Health and Safety Code, are permitted in all residential zoning districts.
Although no specific permit is required, compliance with the performance
standards contained in Section 17.06.050.J.3 of the Temecula Municipal
Code is required.
Large family day care home facilities, as defined in Chapter 3.4, Division 2 of
the Health and Safety Code, are permitted in all residential zoning districts
with the approval of a permit for a large family day cam home facility pursuant
to the provisions of Section 17.04.015 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Compliance with the performance standards contained in Sections
17.06.050.J.3 and J.4 of the Temecula Municipal Code are required.
3. All day care home facilities shall comply with the following requirements.
All day care facilities shall be state licensed and shall be operated
according to all applicable State and local health and safety
requirements and regulations.
The facility shall comply with all land use regulations and site
development standards of the zoning district in which it is located.
An outdoor play area shall be located in the mar yard area. Stationary
play equipment shall not be located in required side yard setbacks or
in the actual front yard. The outdoor play areas shall be securely
locked and appropriately landscaped,
A solid decorative fence or wall at least five feet in height shall be
constructed on all prepedy lines, except in the front yard. Materials,
textures, colors, and design of the fence or wall shall be compatible
with on-site and adjacent propedies. All fences and walls shall
provide for safety with controlled points of entry.
e. All on-site lighting shall be stationary, directed away from adjacent
properties and public rights-of-way, and of an intensity appropriate to
the use it is serving,
F:~Depts%PLANNING~Ordinances~Large Family Day Care~382PA99 -Approach 3,doe 1
In addition to the provisions of Subsection J.3 above, large family day care
home facilities shall comply with the following requirements.
In all residential zoning districts and planning areas, large day care
facilities shall not be located within three hundred (300) feet of
another large family day care home facility or within six hundred (600)
feet of another large family day care home facility that is located on
the same street.
Any additional design or operational requirements that may be
necessary to ensure compatibility of the facility with the surrounding
area and protect the public health and safety."
Section 2. Section 17.04.015 creating Large Family Day Care Permits is hereby
added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"17.04.015 Large Family Day Care Permits
Purpose and Intent. A large family day care permit is intended to allow the
establishment of large family day care home facilities, as defined in Chapter 3.4,
Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, in a manner that is compatible with the
sun'ounding area and that protects the general public health, safety and welfare.
Application Requirements. Applications for large family day care permits shall be
completed in accordance with the Section 17.03.030 of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
Notice. Upon the determination that a large family day care permit application is
complete, the following shall occur:
A public notice shall be sent to every residence within one hundred (100) feet
of the site. The notice shall be mailed first class and postage pre-paid to the
applicant and all occupants (at the site address) and property owners.
2. The Notice shall indicate the following information:
The location and address of the proposed large family day care home
facility.
A description of the proposed activity, including the maximum number
of permitted children and the days of the week and hours of the day
that the facility is proposed to operate.
A statement that the City will approve the proposed large family day
care administratively unless a request for hearing is filed with the
director of planning.
The fourteen (14) calendar day period within which a written request
for a hearing can be made.
Hearing. If a written request for a hearing is filed with the director of planning dudng
the fourteen (14) calendar day public hearing request period, a noticed public hearing
F:~Depts%PLANNING\OrdirmncesU..arge Family Day Care%382PA99 -Approach 3.doc
2
shall be scheduled before the Planning Director to consider the application. The
notice of public hearing shall be sent to all residents and property owners within three
hundred (300) feet of the proposed facility. The requirements of Section
17.03.040,B.2 of the Temecula Municipal Code to notify at least thirty (30) property
owners does not apply to the requirements of this hearing notice.
Approval. A large family day care permit may be approved, conditionally approved
or denied, either administratively or by the Planning Director after the public hearing.
If no requests for a public headng are received during the fourteen (14) calendar day
hearing request pedod, the director of planning may approve or conditionally approve
the large family day care home permit. As determined to be necessary and
appropriate, the director may refer any initial application to the Planning Commission.
Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council,
pursuant to Section 17.03.090 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Findings. The Director of Planning, may approve or conditionally approve a large
family day care permit only when the following findings can be made:
The proposed use is compatible with the nature, character and use of the
surrounding area.
The large family day care use will not adversely effect adjacent residents or
structures.
The nature and location of the proposed use will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not concentrate children
in an dangerous location.
Notice of Decision. A copy of the notice of decision shall be provided to the applicant
in accordance with Section 17.03.040.E of the of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Revocation. A large family day care permit may be revoked or modified by the
director in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.03.080 of the Temecula
Municipal Code."
Section 3.
described below.
Chapter 17.03 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as
the following row:
Table 17.03.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add
Approval
Large Family Day Care
Home Facility ***
Administrative Planning Planning
Approval Director Commission
X X
City Council
B. Add Footnote *** to Table 17.03,010 that reads as follows: "Large Family Day
Care Home Facilities may be approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.04.015."
C. Footnote 1 of Table 17.06,040 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Subject
to the provisions of Section 17.04.015 and Section 17.06.050.J."
F:~)epts~PLANNING\Ordinances~Large Family Day Care~382PA99 -Approach 3,do¢
3
SECTION 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full forca and effect thirty (30) days after its passage;
and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers
voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be posted as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of ,2000.
ATTEST:
Jeff Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
1, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 2000- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of ,2000 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day
of ,2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
F:~:)epts~PLANNING%Ordinances%J, arge Family Day Care~382PA99 -Approach 3.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXCERPTS FROM THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
R:~ORDINANCES'~LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE~382PA99 PC.doc
9
EXCERPT OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
Section 1597.46. All of the following shall apply to large family day care homes:
(a) A city, county, or city and county shall not prohibit large family day care homes on lots
zoned for single-family dwellings, but shall do one of the following:
(1) Classify these homes as a permitted use of residential property for zoning purposes.
(2)
Grant a non-discretionaW permit to use a lot zoned for a single-family dwelling to any
large family day care home that complies with local ordinances prescribing
reasonable standards, restrictions, and requirements concerning spacing and
concentration, traffic control, parking, and noise control relating to such homes, and
complies with subdivision (d) and any regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal
pursuant to that subdivision. Any noise standards shall be consistent with local noise
ordinances implementing the noise element of the general plan and shall take into
consideration the noise level generated by children. The permit issued pursuant to
this paragraph shall be granted by the zoning administrator, if any, or if there is no
zoning administrator by the person or persons designated by the planning agency to
grant such permits, upon the cedi~cation without a headng.
(3)
Require any large family day care home to apply for a permit to use a lot zoned for
single-family dwellings. The zoning administrator. if any, or if there is no zoning
administrator, the person or persons designated by the planning agency to handle the
use permits shall review and decide the applications. The use permit shall be
granted if the large family day care home complies with local ordinances, if any,
proscribing reasonable standards, rostdctions, and requirements concerning spacing
and concentration, traffic control, parking, and noise control relating to such homes,
and complies with subdivision (d) and any regulations adopted by the State Fire
Marshal pursuant to that subdivision. Any noise standards shall be consistent with
local noise ordinances implementing the noise element of the general plan and shall
take into consideration the noise levels generated by children. The local government
shall process any required permit as economically as possible, and fees charged for
review shall not exceed the costs of the review and permit process. Not less than
10 days pdor to the date on which the decision will be made on the application, the
zoning administrator or person designated to handle such use permits shall give
notice of the proposed use by mail or delivery to all owners shown on the last
equalized assessment roll as owning real property within a 100 foot radius of the
extedor boundaries of the proposed large family day care home. No headng on the
application for a permit issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be held before a
decision is made unless a hearing is requested by the applicant or other affected
person. The applicant or other affected person may appeal the decision. The
appellant shall pay the cost, if any of the appeal.
(b)
A large family day care home shall not be subject to the provision of Division 13
(commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(C)
Use of a single-family dwelling for the purposes of a large family day care home shall not
constitute a change of occupancy for purposes of Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 17910
of Division 13 (State Housing Law), or for purposes of local building and fire codes.
R:\ORDINANCESM,ARGE FAMILY DAY CAREL382PA99 PC.doc
10
(d)
(e)
Large family day cam homes shall be considered as single-family residences for the
purposes of the State Uniform Building Standards Code and local building and fire codes,
except with respect to any additional standards specifically designed to promote the fire and
life safety of the children in these homes adopted by the State Fire Marshal pursuant to this
subdivision. The State Fire Marshal shall adopt separate building standards specifically
relating to the subject of fire and life safety in large family day care homes which shall be
published in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. These standards shall apply
uniformly throughout the state and shall include, but not be limited to: (1) the requirement
that a large family day care home contain a fire extinguisher or smoke detector device, or
both, which meets standards established by the State Fire Marshal; (2) specification as to
the number of required exjta from the home; and (3) specification as to the floor or ticors on
which day care may be provided. Enforcement of these provisions shall be in accordance
with Sections 13145 and 13146. No city, county, city and county, or distdct shall adopt or
enforce any building ordinance or local rule or regulation relating to the subject of fire and life
safety in large family day care homes which is inconsistent with those standards adopted by
the State Fire Marshal, except to the extent the building ordinance or local rule or regulation
applies to single-family residences in which day care is not provided.
No later than Apdl 1, 1984, the State Fire Marshal shall adopt the building standards required
in subdivision (d) and any other regulations necessary to implement the provisions of this
section.
(Added by Stars. 1983, Ch. 1233.)
R:~ORDINANCES~_ARGE FAMILY DAY CARE~382PA99 PC.doc
11
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
INITIAL STUDY
R:\ORDINANCES*~,ARGE FAMILY DAY CARE%382PA99 PC.~oc
12
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Project Title
Development Code Amendment (PA99-0382)
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033,
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
David Hogan, Senior Planner
(909) 694-6400
Citywide
Project Sponsors Name and Address City of Temecula
General Plan Designation
Not applicable
Zoning Not applicable
Description of Project
An amendment to the Development Code to set specific
standards for the review and approval of family day care
home facilities. The proposal consists of three alternative
approaches. The three approaches are as follows:
1. Do not specifically regulate large family day care
home facilities;
2. Issue a non-discretionary permit for large family day
care home facilities; or
3. Provide community notice before a permit is issued
for a large family day care facility is approved.
Unless stated otherwise, the analysis contained in this initial
environmental study will evaluate the most regulatory
approach
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Not applicable
Other public agencies whose approval None.
is required
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Dep{S~pLANNING\CEQA~382pA99 IES.do¢
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the eadier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that eadier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Printed name
For
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~CEQA~382PA99 IES.cloc
2
1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
: : ! :: : i: i ::: Ssgnmeeae: ~ ::Mitig~t~: : :Signmean,: No
a. Physically divide an established community?. ,/
b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, spec'ffic
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an
environmental effect?
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
: : :: ~ : ~: !: :;! ~;: :~:~:~:i E ~: ~ ~: i~:!is~i:~::~:i~:i !i!'~nti::i: :;~ ~iEIviigatioa~E::::: ::ESlg~i i: ~::iiNo:::
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ,/
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ,/
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ,/
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project?
Mitigalioa
~ bauee end Supnoffing Meom~ion S~urc. : :: : :~ Ironed :: tncor~mled
Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the dsk of loss. injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on ,/
the most recent Alquist-Pdolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ,/
iv) Landslides? ,/
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ,/
SignHicant:: :N0
:impact:: Irnpec't
\\TEMEC_FSI01%VOL1%DeptS~'LANNING\CEQA'~382PA99 IES.doc
3
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable. or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
dsks to life or properbfi
Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewere are not available for the disposal of waste
water'7
.f
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a Iowedng of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area. including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or dver, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
SubStantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of loss.
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?.
%\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~DepIs~PLANNING~CEQA~382PA99 IES.doc
4
AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
~ =., sups, n. b~m=t~ ..s~rc~.
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
cdteda pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
Signicard Mifigalloa ~Signican~:
6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
poNnlially:::~SignificanlLInles&
: : ~: :~ E: ESlgnitant:: :~: :lvliO~dioei ~ :::SIgnlfmae4:: E !:NO
I
Issues and Supporting ]r,~a~mtionSoUrc, es : :: EE :: : :~bnpact: E ;,~orated ~:i :~: fnpac~
Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ,/
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle tdps, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ,/
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic pattems, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ,/
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Result in inadequate emergency access? ,/
Result in inadequate parking capacity? ,/'
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ,/
supporting altemative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks?
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~)epts%PLANNING\CEQA~382PA99 IES,doc
5
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
: ':: ::~ :: ~:: : : : ·
::: :~; :::~=~:S~~:~::: :
Have a substantial adveme effe~ either dimly or
· mugh habi~t mod~ons, on any species ident~ed
as a ~ndidate, sensitive, or spedal status spedes in
to~1 or regional plans, polldes, or regulations, or by the
Calibmia Depa~ment of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wddlife Se~i~?
Have a substantial adverse effe~ on any dpadan habitat
or o~er .nsitive natural ~mmuni~ identified in Ioal or
regional plans, polices, regulations or by the Calibmia
Depament of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wddlife
Se~i~?
Have a substantial adverse effe~ of fedemily pmte~ed
wetlands as defined by Sec~on 4~ of ~e Clean Water
A~ (including, b~ not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) ~mugh dim~ removal, filing, hydmlogi~l
inte~ption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict wilh any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
8, MINERAL RESOURCES, Would the project:
:~ignifica~ff: !Mitiplkm::: :: ~Signirlcant:: ~No~
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ,f
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important ,/
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan. specific plan or other land use plan?
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1%Depts~aLANNING~CEQA~382PA99 IES.doc
6
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Is~jee and :Suppofthxt
Create a sign~i~nt ha~rd to ~e public or ~e
environment ~mugh ~e m~ine trans~tion, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Crate a signifi~nt hazard to the public or the
environment ~rough reasonably foreseeable upset and
acddent ~nditions involving ~e release of ha~rdous
materials into ~e environmen~
Emit h=ardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely ha~rdous materials, subsmn~s, or ac~ely
haardous materials, subsmn~s, or ~ste within one-
quatier mile of an existing or pro~sed s~ool?
Be Io~ted on a site whi~ is included on a list of
haardous materials sites ~mpiled pursuant to
Government Code Se~ion 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a signifi~nt ha~rd to the public or ~e
environment?
For a proje~ Io~ted within an ai~od land use plan or,
where su~ a plan has not been adopted, wi~in ~o
miles or a public ai~od or public use ai~od, would ~e
proje~ result in a safeW ha~rd for people residing or
wowing in ~e proje~ area?
For a projed wi~in ~e vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would
the project result in a safety haard for people residing or
wowing in ~e project area?
Impair implementation of or physi~lly intedem with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
eva~ation plan?
Epose people or stm~ures to a signifi~nt dsk or loss,
inju~ or dea~ involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands am adja~nt D uffianized areas or where
residences are inte~ixed with wildlands?
10. NOISE. Would the project result in:
Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
Po~ential|y
: : i: Po~enliNiy:i::SignifmanlUnlels:Le~sThah~! ::; ::
~:~porlled: iml~ct::~ Impec~
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI~)epts%PLANNING\CEQA%382PA99 IES.doc
7
A substantial temporary or pedodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?.
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would ,/'
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Government sen~ices in any of the following areas:
~lla
s : ~:s::::: :~:~: !:s: ::: s~ ~:::~:~ ::: ~ ::s.~:~: ~:~ :!!: : :;s::: :: ::s ::Z::Zi ;:;Z!~i:i!: ::! ;i!kttlgalioaZ:: ::Signlrmanl ~ No
E :: ~::i E ::::~ii~i::~:~i;i:~:.i~:$~~:So~i:i~i i!:~: EE:;:!iE!~i i:-!:i: !ii !:~i: E~I~CI!~: :;~: :~ed ::: :Elmpact ~:impeCt
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical ,~
impacts associates with the provisions of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the
pubtic services?
b. Fire protection? ,/
c. Police protection? ,f
d. Schools? ,/
e. Parks? ,/'
f. Other public facilities? ,/'
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment fadlities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ,/'
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
polenila y:: :Significant Unles&: :Lel~:Ttmn!:;:
; ~ Mitigalioe ~ ::!Sighirmarit:i: :!NO::
Incorporated :Irapad : Impact
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~Dei~s~PLANNING~CEQA~382pA99 IES,doc
8
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ,/
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not ,/
limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and histodc building
within a state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ,/
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ,/
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ,/
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ,/
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ,/
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred ,/
outside of formal cemeteries?
::ksjudls~ild~,Suplx~ijo~ou~ee : ::: :: :: !~hllpaC~: ~;:::E :lncorporaied~ JfTlp~Ct:~:EE~: hl~p~ct
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
: E : ; ]
::lssuesilld:SUppodingT,,~,,ation:Soumes : :
Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require ,/
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
%~TEMEC_FS101%VOLl%Depts~PLANNING\CEQA~382PA99 IES.doc
9
Poteflliaily~ :S;~nificeni Unless
16, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ,/
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
restrict the range of a ram or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major pedods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually ,/
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects?
Does the project have environmental effects which will ,/
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
The proposed project is an amendment to the Development Code that would modify the current provisions
regulating large family day care home facilities, Day cam home facilities are located within existing residential
structures and are and accessory extension of the basic residential activities. The proposed Ordinance to
regulate these activities in a manner that is consistent with State Law will not create an adverse impact on the
environment. In addition, the proposed changes continue to be consistent with the general impacts and
discussed in the adopted General Plan and Final EIR. As a result, no adverse impacts have been identified
and no mitigation measures are necessary.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%Depts~PLANNING~CEQA~382PA99 iES,doc
10
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CiTY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 2, 2000
Planning Application No. PA99-0394
(Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99o0394 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,311 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH (CAR
SPA) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONVENIENCE
MARKET/GAS STATION AND A 1,514 SQUARE FOOT LUBE
SHOP, ON A 1.93 ACRE LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN THE TWO ENTRANCES TO THE
PROMENADE MALL SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR°S PARCEL NO. 910-320-039 & 040, AND LOTS
P AND Q OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495 AND PARCEL
MERGER PA99-0007.
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-
0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) based on the
Determination of Consistency with a project for which an
Environmental impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
InSite Real Estate
Robert Heitman
1603 West Sixteenth St.
Oak Brook, IL 60523
Planning Application No. PA99-0394 is for a Development
Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a business called Car
Spa which proposes to construct and operate a 13,311
square foot full service car wash, gas station/convenience
market and a 1,514 square foot drive-thru lube shop, on a
1.93 acre lot.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
1
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Project Area Net:
Total Building Areas:
Total Canopy Areas:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Hardscape:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
Located on the east side of Ynez Road south of Winchester
Road between the two mall entrances.
Site CC (Community Commercial)
Site SP-7 (Retail Commercial
North: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
South: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
East: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan)
West: CC (Community Commercial)
Promenade Mall
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Promenade Mall
West: Commercial Center
85,961 square feet
14,825 square feet
6,052 square feet
19,935 square feet
44,513 square feet
636 square feet
1.97 acres
17.3 %
7.0%
23.2 %
51.8 %
0.7 %
4,712 s.f. retail @ 5 spaces/1000 s.f. 24 spaces
31 spaces
18'-25'
BACKGROUND
This application, for a full service car wash with other services, was formally submitted to the
Planning Department on September 28, 1999. Prior to formal submittal, staff worked with the
applicant through severel site plan designs and elevation changes. This site was difficult to layout
for this use due to three easements crisscrossing the property. A storm drain easement runs the
length of the property parallel to Ynez Road and there are two view corridors into the mall, one
through the middle of the property and the other along the south property line. Staff and the
applicant feel that the project presented in this report is the best configuration based on business
function, circulation, and setback limitations. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting
was held on October 21, 1999, and the application was deemed complete on January 7, 2000.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a Development Plan to build and operate a full service car wash in
conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit for a convenience market/gas station and automotive
lube service center known formally as Car Spa. (A detailed description is listed in the applicants
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
2
"Statement of Operation," which is attached.) The project is located on the east side of Ynez Road
between the two major entries into the Promenade Mall. The proposed main building is 13,311
square feet, which includes the car wash tunnel, post wash areas and a market with limited caf~
amenities. Outside this building will be a waiting area patio with seating and landscaping. To the
south of the main building is the 1,500 square foot lube service building. This building is designed
for drive-thru service and the bay doors are on the north and south sides of the building. These
doors do not face the street. Attached to the east side of the building is a 2,371 square foot canopy
covering the car wash queuing area where vehicles will be cleaned out before heading into the
wash. On the site between the lube service building and Ynez Road will be the fueling stations.
Under the 3,680 square foot awning will be four fueling islands that can accommodate eight
vehicles. A landscape planter has been placed on either side of the canopies to aid in screening
the site and the activities.
ANALYSIS
Site Desion and Circulation
The overall site is 1.93 acres with the buildings backed up to the east property line along the ring
road. Surrounding the site on three sides are Ynez Road to the west, the entry drive to the north,
and the Mall ring road to the east. There are two points of ingress and egress to the site from the
ring road, one on the south end of the site, which is shared with the parcel to the south. A driveway
at the north end of the site is designated as an exit only. This was done to limit turning movements
in and out of this driveway that may conflict with the main entrance into the mall. On site vehicles
will either turn right upon entering the site and line up for a car wash or an oil change or head
straight into the site towards the fueling stations. To reach the convenience market, vehicles will
have to pass by the fueling stations and continue to the parking area in front of the main building.
ParkinQ Analysis
This project was difficult to assess a relevant parking count under the parking standards per the
Out Parcels Design Guidelines of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The activities of
the business involves the lining up and moving of vehicles through the related services, therefore,
not necessitating a large number of parking stalls. The only floor area that needed parking is the
convenience market, which occupies 4,700 square feet. Therefore, based on the required five
parking spaces per 1000 square feet of retail space, 24 parking spaces are required. To assure
that there would be enough parking for customers and employees, the applicant is providing thirty-
one parking spaces.
Architecture & Colors
There are two buildings (convenient market and lube bays) and two canopies (gas and queuing)
that utilize architectural features found on the elevations of the mall. These include stucco wall
finishes and metal seam roof elements including a tower and surrounding mansard with a dark
green finish. Around the bottom of the building will be 3 feet of "traditional brick" veneer to define
the base of the buildings and to define the entry of the main building. The main building is
rectangular with a tower element on the long side of the building facing Ynez Road. The openings
to the wash tunnel do not face the street and are as far back on the site and building as feasibly
possible. They should not be visible from the public right of way. Along the street side of the
building will be the post wash area for drying and finishing the vehicles. This area is built into the
building and is screened with a short wall topped with metal trellises (dark blue-gray) between
columns. The exterior walls of the building will be approximately 20 feet high with the tower
reaching 28 feet. The finish color of the stucco walls will be "Ostrich Feather' (off white) with accent
bands, columns and cornice capping finished in "Salmon Suede" (pinkish tan). The lube building,
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report,ooc
3
queuing awning, and the gas canopy are all finished to match the main building's colors and
materials.
Landscaping
Three sides of this site are along roadways that require a landscape buffer making up the majority
of the sites 23.7 percent landscaping. Landscaping is provided at the base of both buildings,
around the patio, flanking the gas canopy, along the queuing areas for the lube service and car
wash, and leading up to the storefront. Most of the perimeter landscaping is part of the mall master
landscape design; however, thirteen percentage of the site is landscaped after discounting the
required perimeter landscape areas. This site sits two to five feet higher than Ynez Road and the
landscaping along Ynez Road nearest the north entry to the mall will be banked. To assist in
screening the parking stalls, a retaining wall is being installed that will allow the landscaping to be
raised somewhat higher than the finished grade of the site. The street tree planting and the trees
necessary for screening of the parking areas should provide an effective buffer of the activities on
site. At the base of the buildings will be a mix of scrubs and flowering plants with vines being use
to climb up the trelliswork along the post wash area.
Siqnaqe
The applicant is proposing an extensive number of signs for this project. According to the sign
guidelines for the out parcels, a tenant is entitled to one sign per frontage for a maximum of four
signs. Signs identifying specialized services or operations are permitted; however, no more than
two are allowed and they are limited to 12 inches in height. Due to the development constraints
of this site this project needs two buildings to make up the single business operating at this site.
Staff has had some concerns with regard to the number of signs that should be permitted and
whether the vague limitations of the guidelines apply to each building or one business. Because
the Design Guidelines do not address the signs as they relate to a particular type of business, such
as gas stations, staff referred to the City's Sign Code for direction. The Sign Code limits gas
station canopies to two signs on the gas canopy to identify the business or brand of gasoline. This
project is also entitled to monument signs that identify their business. One has been proposed
along Ynez Road and the other along the ring road.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is within the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 for which an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. Under California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations)' this
project is exempt and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for Planning Applications No.
PA99-0394.
Section 15162 applies when an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a
project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes
not discussed or examined in the EIR.
The affected area of the site development meets the criteria noted by developing consistent with
the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 land uses which anticipated mixed uses
including gas stations. Therefore, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant
to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
4
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project is consistent with the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation and the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan 263 zoning applicable to the property in the Temecula
General Plan and Development Code respectively. Upon approval of the Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and standards
for commercial development prescribed by the Development Code and Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development,
and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and
employment base.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposal, a car wash, convenience store/gas station with auto lube service, is
consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community
Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for Specific Plan (SP-7) contained in the City's Development Code.
The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the
type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,
Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient
Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. The proposal, a convenience store/gas station with auto lube service, is consistent with the
land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use
standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for
Specific Plan (SP-7) contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly ptanned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of
commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with
other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions,
and fire and building codes.
2. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and development
of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site
improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with,
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.cloc
5
all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures.
The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved master development
plan. The development of this site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development
features prescribed in the Specific Plan 263, the Development Code, and required by the
Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. The type of use as proposed and as conditioned, will
not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community
The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence, in view of the record as a whole, before the Planning Commission at the time of
their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a
Public Hearing where members of the community have had an opportunity to be heard on
this matter before the Commission renders their decision.
Attachments:
1.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11
Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 22
Exhibits - Blue Page 24
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Vicinity Map
Zoning Map
General Plan
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Elevation Main Building
Elevation Lube Building
Gas Canopy Elevation
Site Cross Sections
Floor Plan Main Building
Statement of Operation - Blue Page 34
F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff reportdoc
6
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0394 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,311 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH (CAR
SPA) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONVENIENCE
MARKET/GAS STATION AND A 1,514 SQUARE FOOT LUBE
SHOP, ON A 1.93 ACRE LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN THE TWO ENTRANCES TO THE
PROMENADE MALL SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-320-039 & 040, AND LOTS
P AND Q OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495 AND PARCEL
MERGER PA99-0007.
WHEREAS, InSite Real Estate, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0394, in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0394 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0394 on
February 2, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Applications No. PA99-0394;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0263 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a Development Plan to build and operate a full service car wash in
conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit for a convenience market/gas station and automotive
lube service center known formally as Car Spa on a 1.93 acre site. This project is consistent with
the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use
standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific
Plan 263. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for
the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan 263, the
City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
8
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Conditional Use Permit Findines. The Planning Commission, in approving
Planning Application No. PA99-0394 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.04.010. E of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a Development Plan to build and operate a full service car wash in
conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit for a convenience market/gas station and automotive
lube service center known formally as Car Spa on a 1.93 acre site. This project is consistent with
the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use
standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific
Plan 263. The site is therefore propedy planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for
the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan 263, the
City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated
site improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all
applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development
will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
C. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved
development plan. The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate
the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as conditioned,
will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community
E. The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time
of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public
Hearing where members of the community have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter
before the Commission renders their decision.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-
0394 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This
section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified or negative
declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there
are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR.
The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied
to this project.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0394 for a Development Plan for the design,
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
9
operate a full service car wash in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit for a convenience
market/gas station and automotive lube service center (Car Spa on the east side of Ynez Road
south of Winchester Road between the two mall entrances, and known as Assessor's Parcel No.
910-320-039 & 040, Lots P and Q of Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0495 and Parcel Merger PA99-
0007, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A (Development Plan), and
Exhibit B (Conditional Use Permit), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of February, 2000.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Teme. cula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of February,
2000 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.dec
11
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0394 (Development Plan - Retail building for Car Spa.)
Project Description:
A proposal to build a 13,311 square foot commercial
building for a car wash, convenience store/gas station
with a 1,500 square foot auto lube service located on
Out-lots "P & Q" of the Promenade Mall, on the eastside
of Ynez Road between the two major entries to the mall.
DIF Category:
$2.00 per square foot (pursuant to the Development
Agreement for the Promenade Mall Project PA96-0333)
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
910-320-039 & 040
February 2, 2000
February 2, 2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within
1.
Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of'
seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the
Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval
of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
F:\DeptS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff reporLdoc
12
10.
11.
12.
13.
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. Additionally, the following cdteria must be met during development of the project:
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent
locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view.
Per the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan and the Design Guidelines the double
detector check assembly must be installed underground.
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of the transformer and the double detector check
prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
Parking lot lights shall be of a type consistent with the standards for the Mall Out Parcels.
The site lighting plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to installation.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F-H" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to
be necessary by the Planning Manager the parapet will be raised to provide for this
screening.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with Exhibit "K" (Color and Material Board) contained on
file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from
the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Planning Manager.
Material
Stucco walls painted to match
Stucco accent, cornice, columns
Metal roof painted to match
Aluminum Storefront System
Windows
Brick Veneer
Trellis
Color
Sherwin Willlares #SW1074, Ostrich Feathers
Sherwin Willlares #SW1066, Salmon Suede
Sherwin Willjams #SW1462, Park Bench
Sherwin Williams #SW1320, Tasteful Tan
Ford's Vision Glass, Clear
Natural Red
Sherwin Williams #SW2419, Tempest Blue
Lighting installed under the fueling canopy shall be flush mounted and shielded to eliminate
stray light and glare. The under canopy lights for the fueling islands shall be recessed
mounted and shielded to eliminate stray light and glare beyond the project site.
The trash enclosure doors shall have a smooth face to avoid the typical industrial style door
that creates a harsh contrast with the fiat stucco and brick finish.
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
13
14. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No.
PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
15. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and retum one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
16. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H, K", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan,
Color and Material Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided by
the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and submit five (5) full
size copies and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "D"
(Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "C", the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
17. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "K"
(Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F-H", the
colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
19. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "E", or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of planrings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
20. An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F-H", or as amended by these conditions.
a. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved
Exhibits "D" and "F-H", or as amended by these conditions.
21. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weecls, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
22. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee
the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
14
23.
24.
and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping
and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning
Manager, the bond shall be released.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed re~ectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
25. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan
all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
26. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
28. The northernmost driveway shall be used as an exit only and restricted to a right turn out
movement.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
29. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
30. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject
to approval by the Department of Public Works.
31. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
F:~DeptS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff reportdoc
15
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
32. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizin9 of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
33. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
34. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
35. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
36. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
37. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
38. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street light at the southernmost driveway shall be relocated as shown on plan and
installed per specifications for street light installation along Mall ring road.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400.401 and 402.
e. All concentrated drainage shall be directed towards the proposed catch basins and
holding tanks. Oil deposits and other debris shall be collected in holding tanks
before flow enters the storm drain system.
39. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
40. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
F:\DeptS\PLANNING\C U P\394~99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
16
41. The Developer shall grant an easement for ingress and egress to the adjacent property.
42. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Gerlificate of Occupancy
43. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shalt receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
44. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
45. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanicel Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
46. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
47. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
48. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
49. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
50. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
51. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
52. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
53.
54.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State
Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building design.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff reporLdoc
17
55. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review,
56. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
57. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
58. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
59. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
60. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
61. Show all building setbacks
FIRE DEPARTMENT
62. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans am reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
63. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2200 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
64. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent
public streets. Hydrants shall be spacad at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than
250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a
hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix Ill-B)
65. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
66. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
68. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
18
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902).
69. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
70. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
71. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
72. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
73. Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall
display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
74. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
75. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
76. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm
system. (CFC 902.4)
77. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
78.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, fiammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
OTHER AGENCIES
F:\Depts\PLANNiNG\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
19
79. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated October 7, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
80. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control's transmittal dated November 8, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
81. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecuia Police
Department's transmittal dated October 20, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
82. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 24, 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
F:\DeptS\PLANNING\C U P~394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
20
Ran o
Phillip L. Forbes
October 7, 1999
Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY FOR PARCELS NO. 23, NO. 24,
AND NO. 25 OF PARCEL MAP 28530-1
APN 910-320-018, APN 910-320-019, AND APN 910-320-020
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394
Dear Mr. Thomsley:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore. would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement, which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
99%SB:rnc259~F012-T6%FCF
DAVID P. ZAPPE
0cncral Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Plannin De artment
PostO ,ce f&g033
Temecuta, California 82589-9033
A.ention:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
909/955-12C ^
909/788-99~5 FAX
511801
Re: Pn
The Disthct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other and use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not lan check city land use eases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for suck eases. Disthct comments/reeommendat Des for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific mterast to the District including District Masler Dra na a P an feci ties, other r ona flood
control and draina · facilities which could be considered a logical comportenter extension of a master~n s stem.
and District Area ~reinage Plan faes (development mitigation fees) n add tide, information of a general nsn'~re is
provided.
The District hes not reviewed the proposed project in deta I and the fo owing cheered comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
This project would not be impacted by Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional roterest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The Distdct will acce t ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standPards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance P an check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels storm dra ns 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that cou d be
conmdered regional in nature and/or a I ical extension of the adopted '
Master Drainage Plan. The District wo~jl°~ consider accepting ownership ot such facilities on written request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standards, and D~stdct plan check and inspection will
be requ red for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
hock or money order only to ~e Flood Control District pdor [Po~ issuance of building or gradin permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of~e actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project ma re uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES perm t from the State Water
Resources Con~/ngl ~oard. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this pro'ect involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain then the City shou d
require t~e applicant to provide all studies. calculations, plans and other nformat on reqGired to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR)
prior to grading. recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMRI pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a licant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the CaPi}omia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean PV~ater Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wdtten correspondence from these a encies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Cer~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of ~e Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: t I - ~ -~t~
City of Temecula
Temecula Police Department
OCTOBE~ 20, 1999
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI
RE: PA99-0394
MbMOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SELF SERVICE GASOUNE STATION WITH
COSMETIC RE,AIR CENTER, AUTO ACCESSOR/ES 6;Ai F~ AND FOOD/
BEVERAGE ARF. A
CASE PLANNEll: THOMAS TNORNSL_cY
Wlth raspact to She co~crdjons of approval fix ~e above referenced Project T~, the faDowlng
COfiCFdlOM are i~b~tJTted by th~ Tmnecub Pob E)epel~last lego(~ftg 'officer and public r4fety' roeHazes:
1. Alll~lcant shall erieare el hedges and shnabbeqr ~a~oundlng the building be maintahed at
greater Shah ~i~f-six (36) inch..
2. Applicant thai ensure any bees suemuhlitg tim bublng m kept It · distan~ ~ as to deter roof
3. AJ padclng Jots, drivewartS. mad pealwaYne wdkwaya shell be iufffiaa~ed wiSh · minimum maintained
one (1 } foot-ca of fight at ground le~d, eveMy dispersed, e~ndnatbtg adl ohaclows. AJ e~tefior lighdi~GI
fixtures a/tail be vandaJ adstam. AI eztr, zlof 10htblg thaJI b· cormoled by pholocelis, l~ners, or offier me·he
10 p~,lvent aleactivation by ullmft~odzed ~.
4. All extedor door· shd have she~ own vanda/redfWnt B0ht ~ct~re insteJlnd above. The doors sh;dl bd
Ulumb3alnd with · mla~mum mabltaJned one (1| foot caddie of Gght at ground level, evedy diwparsed.
exterior lightlag fixtures must caoform to the der,~r of the exterior build'gag,
5. Ady puMlc to/ephenss located on the extedoi, of U!e ~ buildlag dmil be Ideced i~ · wdl41ghted,
highly vile arere, and b3ataged with · 'CabOut Ody' feature ts deter Ioltedn9,
A~ doors, whldows, leckrn9 mechafilarns, hblges, Ind offier roLeceil·menus hedwae
comm·rcJal ot instltutlofild grade,
7, Any graffitj painted Or marked up4n ~e prentbes shall be emoved or pinted over edtllt twefity-four
(24) hour~ of behg dls;0vored.
8. P~odde baUd'rag eddreee on roof-top by ch-Jkjng out · grid 9' oft center and · height of 48% pa;mb39
ntmmfab wldt · atandNd 9' paint roler uelng flotescett ydlow pab-d oe norreed bald-up roofs, s/flOra 9' wld/h
be~Neetnumerds. bshalbepara/Idtomtdfacingbpdm,vyr,~eet-
9. All mot hatchel ·hal be painted 'kltefgado41d Orqe',
10. SUeat eddresa dudi be posted in · vtdble location, minimum 12 rnches b~ height, on She street ride of
the but·dino with · co~traslJNI background,
11, Upea comldetjon of N b,n~Gng. · moAjt0ted ~ system thdl be ~xta~nd ond monitored 24J~ours ·
day by · dee;gAated private alton1 company, to notify the Po;c~ Departll~nt of Nty intruslo~.
A/I queetlons regaelng the~e cob shad be referred to tha Pol3ce Department Cfkne Preventjon & Plans
sectIcm (909| 606-2626.
PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY
MAKING FINDINGS FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY
Criteria to Justify Making a Findinc~ of Public Convenience or Necessit,/
YES 1.
YES 2.
YES 3.
YES 4.
YES 5.
YES 6.
Does the proposed establishment have any unique features which are not found
in other similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other
special services)?
Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e.
patrons of a different socio-economic class)?
Does the proposed establishment provide entertainment that would fill a niche in
the community (i.e. a comedy club, jazz club, etc.)
Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales
in conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of
other establishments in the area?
Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barders (i.e.
freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed
establishment from other establishments?
Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant
influx of population during certain seasonal periods?
Criteria to Not Justif,/Makincf a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessit,/
NO 1. Is there are proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the
proposed establishment?
NO 2A. Are there any sensitive uses (i.e. schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close
proximity (600 feet) to the proposed establishment?
NO 2B. Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses?
NO 3. Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their
property by the residents of the area?
NO 4. Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area?
Vicinity Map with a 1/4 mile radius
Number of similar uses within the City
Inventory (listing) of other off-site buinessses within 1 mile and 3 miles
Notice Requirements
iTuesday October 26, 1999 3:28Fm -- Free ,90c %086' -- Page
Z~/slk~ COUN'F~ OF RNF. RSIDE * HEALTH 5ERVIC:E5 AGENCY
DF-PARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
24 October ] 999
lvlr. Thomas Thornsley
Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: Planning Application No. PA99-0394
Dear Mr. Thornsley:,
After reviewin8 the plans regarding the above referenced project the following comments are
given: This facility will likely goredhandle lm-~rdous materials and generate l~7~rdous waste.
Therefore, a permit for each of these pingruns will be required from this Agency prior to
operation. Since the the drawing depicts n fueling site, and there will likely be storage tanks
placed below grade, the project is required to undergo plan check review by this Agency.
fithere are any questions regarding this, please contact me nl (909) 694-5027.
Jim Sappington~x~
Hazardous Materials
Management Specialist llrl
4065 County Circle Drive, Riverside. CA 92503 o Phone 0;~9) 358-5316 s FAX (900) 358-5017
(Me/ling Address - P.O. BOx 7600 * Riverside, CA 92513-7600)
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.dec
21
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit - To operate a
Convenience market/gas station and a 1,514 square foot lube shop)
Project Description:
A proposal to build a 13,311 square foot commercial
building for a car wash, convenience store/gas station
with a 1,500 square foot auto lube service located on
Out-lots "P & Q" of the Promenade Mall, on the eastside
of Ynez Road between the two major entries to the mall
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
910-320-001
February2,2000
February2,2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgemerits, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval
of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0394, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
F:\DeptS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff reportdoc
22
The installation of the landscaping along Winchester shall be in substantial conformance
with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits D & E) for the purpose of screening the view of
the parking auto service activity from the public right-of-way. Prior to the release for
occupancy staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verify that they
provide the intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager
shall have the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the
intent of the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas
shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
At the end of the first year of occupancy, and pdor to the release of the Landscape Security
Bond, the landscaping will be inspected for conformance with the screening requirement.
Should replacement landscaping be needed the owner will be required to make these
improvements.
The use of window signs will be limited to those permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance No.
98-10 and in no case shall more than 20% of the window areas shall be used for signage.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicanrs Signature
Date
Name printed
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
23
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS101WOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts~PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff reporLdoc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
)0(
~jO000000.(
O000000~O0000000<
~'O000(
~0000.(
ect Site
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan 263)
ZONING MAP
m m
~O0000(
~00000(
~O0000(
~O0000(
}O000<
,0000(
.(
EXHIBIT C GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report. doc
26
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan)
EXHIBIT D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depta\PLANNING~C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report. doc
28
CITY OF TEMECULA
;i
,?
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
29
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\DeptS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
30
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT H ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
31
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT I CROSS SECTIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
32
CITY OF TEMECULA
Z
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0394 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
EXHIBIT J FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 2, 2000
F:\Depts\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
33
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 3
STATEMENT OF OPERATION
F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\C U P\394-99 Car Spa\Staff report.doc
34
Car Spa Fadlity, S.E.C. Winchester O Ynez, Temecula September 27, 1999
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Provide a wdtten statement outlining your request for a Conditional Use Permit. Your
response must give a detailed description of the proposed use and shall include, but is
not limited to:
1.
Hours and days of operation.
Gasoline Service Hours
Convenience Store
Lube Hours
Car Wash
Number of employees.
Gasoline Service Area
Convenience Store Area
Lube Area
Car Wash Area
Amount of required parking.
24 spaces
Amount of average daily tdps generated.
600 plus over a 15-hour workday
Type of equipment or processes used.
7 a.m. - 10 p.m.
7 a.m. - 10 p.m.
8 a.m. - 8 p.m.
8 a.m. - 8 p.m.
1
5-6
6
32
The facility includes a car wash facility which comprises various pieces of
equipment to complete the washing of the vehicle.
Use of hazardous materials.
The site will be selling gasoline motor fuel. The storage and handling of
the fuel will be in conformance with State and Federal guidelines.
Other descriptions that effectively describe the proposed use.
FFA 1F:%DATA~Wp~ADMIN~MISC%Car Spa~TemeculaStmntofOper4r2,dcc
Car Spa Fadlib/, S.E.C. Winchester 0 Ynez~ Temecula Hay 13, 1999
EXHIBIT A
Description of the proposal:
This Car Spa Facility represents the state of the art in one stop convenience auto care
for the community. The project consists of the following elements:
Wash Facility: Our principle business is a full service wash and dry operation.
Equipment and labor used ensures the highest possible consistency in quality
and speed. Equipment chosen produces the safest environment for our guests'
vehicles. Chemicals and polishes were researched and chosen for optimum
application with equipment and our environmental concems. Car Spa uses two
methods of recycling to ensure optimum chemical and water recycling. Car Spa
offers Express Detail service, including hand waxing and carpet and mat
shampooing. Car Spa stands behind the safety and quality of the wash and
detail with a wdtten guarantee.
Lube Center: The Lube Center features comprehensive maintenance needs
including oil and lube inspections to ensure fluids and filters conform to
manufacturers' specs and fluids topped off (no charge). Lube Centers also
perform maintenance on transmissions, coolants, air conditioning and fuel
systems.
Retail Sales Area: The Retail Sales Area is for three purposes. First, as a
comfortable waiting area for guests; second, as a place for guests to look at and
purchase a highly selective amount of automotive accessories that can be
installed by the guests themselves and third, to provide a food service that will
offer fresh, made to order sandwiches, baked goods, salty snacks and candy
along with hot and cold beverages for either on-site consumption or take out.
They will also include convenience market goods
Self Service Gasoline: Self Service Gasoline will be provided utilizing the latest
in technology with credit card/debit card accepting dispensers.
FFA I F:\Data\Wp~ADMIN%MISC%Car Spa\TemeculaExhibit*fr2.doc
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
REQUEST FOR 1999 RESULTS OF QUARTERLY ABC JUVENILE DECOY
PROGRAMS
Temecula Police Department
Memorandum
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
January 11, 2000
Captain Domehoe via Chain of Command, cc: Lt. Bates, Lt.
Go!logly
Sergeant Mitch AIm, Special Teams
Request for 1999 Results of Quarterly ABC Juvenile Decoy
Programs
Per your request, I have attached the 1998 and 1999 results of the Quarterly
Juvenile ABC Decoy Programs.
I have also attached the 1998 and 1999 Quarterly Juvenile Tobacco Decoy Program
results, in case the planning commission requests these in the immediate future.
Temecula Police Department
Ouarterly ABC Juvenile Decoy Program Results - 1998-1999
The Temecula Pohce Depmhuent's Problem Oriented Policing Team has continued its
efforts to enforce responsible sales of alcohol products within the retail community of
the City of Temecula. This program is another component of Operation E.R.A.C.I.T.
(Enforce Responsible Alcohol Consutnption In Temecula).
This program is a cooperative effort with the Bureau of Alcohol Control (ABC). Four
programs were conducted in 1999. Ninety-four businesses were visited and observed
during the programs. Only three business were cited, and submitted for administrative
review to ABC, for selling alcohol to a minor.
In 1998, eighty-seven businesses were visited and observed during the four programs
conducted. Eleven businesses were cited for selling alcohol to a minor during the 1998
programs.
The following are the results of the individual programs for both 1998 and 1999:
1998 Businesses Citations 1999 Businesses Citations
Observed Issued Observed Issued
Jan. 21 5 Jan. 23 1
Mar. 11 1 Mar. 23 1
Jun. 25 1 Jun. 26 1
Sep. 20 4 Sep. 22 0
Totals 87 11 94 3
Temecula Police Department
Quarterly Tobacco Juvenile Decoy Program Results - 1998-1999
The Temecula Police Department's Problem Oriented Policing Team has continued
its efforts to enforce responsible sales of tobacco products within the retail
community of the City of Temecula.
Four programs were conducted in 1999. Resulting in officers visiting and observing
one-hundred and nineteen businesses. Ten businesses were cited for selling tobacco
products to a minor during the year.
In 1998, one-hundred and five businesses were visited and observed during the four
programs conducted. Four businesses were cited for selling tobacco products to a
minor during the 1998 programs.
The following are the results of the individual programs for both 1998 and 1999:
1998 Businesses Citations 1999 Businesses Citations
Observed Issued Observed Issued
Jan. 34 1 Jan. 34 3
Mar. 25 0 Mar. 31 6
Jun. 20 1 Jun. 25 0
Sep. 26 2 Sep. 29 1
Totals 105 4 119 10
Temecula Police Department
Memorandum
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
January 5, 2000
Diana Damon-White, Temecula Valley Unified School District
Sergeant Aim, Special Teams
OCJP - Suppression of Drug Abuse in Schools Program
Update - July 1999 to January 2000
The Suppression of Drug Abuse in Schools Program has just completed the first half
of the 1999-2000 school year. The program is divided into two components.
The first component comprises presentations. To date, the Special Team and Traffic
Officers have completed 54 hours of presentations. These include the following:
Staff training:
Traffic (Driving under the influence) presentations:
Drug/Inhalant presentations:
22 hours
08 hours
32 hours
The second component comprises "Dedicated Patrol". To date, the Special Team
Officers have completed 184 hours. These include the following:
Juveniles contacted:
Truant citations:
Marijuana arrests:
Alcohol arrests:
Tobacco citations:
72 hours
31
4
7
25
See attached statistical form for further details.
C)
PRESENTATION OF THE LENNAR TOUR
TO ORANGE COUNTY
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting
will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR
35.102.35.~104 ADA Title II]
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
FEBRUARY 2, 2000 - 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2000-007
Commissioner Webster
Fahey, Mathewson, Webster, Guerdem
The Swearing in of the Newly Appointed Planning Commissioner- John Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no__t on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary pdor to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Approval of AQenda - APPROVED 5-0
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of February 2, 2000.
2
Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for the Health Zone Natural Foods Store,
located at 41915 Motorcar Parkway, Suite A-C, at the northesast corner of Ynez Road
and Solana Way - APPROVED 4-1, RON GUERRIERO DENIED
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Support Finding of Convenience or Necessity
3
ReQuest to Rescind Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 24136, Newland Communities,
located north of De Portola, east of Margadta, west of Butterfield Sta~le and south of
Leena Way - APPROVED 5-0
RECOMMENDATION
3.1 Approve
COM MISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
4
Plannin.~ Application No. PA99-0382 (Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance)
Citywide ordinance amendinQ the Development Code - Senior Planner Dave HoQan -
CONTINUED OFF CALENDAR 5-0
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 200O-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF THE
TITLE 17 RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR LARGE
FAMILY DAY CARE HOME FACITIIES" (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA99-0382)
F:~)EPTS~PLANNING~plancomm~agendas~2000%2-2~0,doc
2
Plannin~l Application No. PA99-0394 (Development Plan/Conditional Use Permit), located
on the east side of Ynez Road south of Winchester Road between the two mall entrances
- Project Planner Thomas Thomsley - APPROVED 5-0
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA99-0394 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,311 SQUARE FOOT CAR
WASH (CAR SPA) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A
CONVENIENCE MARKET/GAS STATION AND A 1,514
SQUARE FOOT LUBE SHOP, ON A 1.93 ACRE LOT LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN THE TWO
ENTRANCES TO THE PROMENADE MALL SOUTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
910-320-039 & 040 AND LOTS P AND Q OF LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495 AND PARCEL MERGER PA99-0007
5.2
Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0394 (Conditional
Use PermitJDevelopment Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a
project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 -Subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Request for 1999 Results of Quarterly ABC Juvenile Decoy Programs
Presentation on the Lennar Tour to Orange County
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 16, 2000, 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
F:~DEPTS~PLANNING~piancomm~agendas~;OOO~*2-O0.doc
3