Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout090991 PRC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD A T VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute Chairperson Kirby ROLL CALL: Brode, Harker, Hillen, Kirby, Nimeshein PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be fiIled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Parks and Recreation Secretary before the item is addressed by the Commis- sion. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 090991 .AGN 1 DIVISION REPORTS COMMISSION BUSINESS A/3Droval of Minutes - August 12, 1991 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve minutes of August 12, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting as submitted. Temecula Rose Garden RECOMMENDATION: 2. 1 Consider request from the Temecula Rose Society and Johnson and Johnson Development Corporation to accept approximately 3.45 acres of property on Jedediah Smith Road for a rose garden. Park ProDertv on la Serena Wav RECOMMENDATION: 3. 1 Defer any discussions with the Ridgeview Homeowners Association to lease the property on La Serena Way until the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed. Sports Park Batting Cage Proposal DISCUSSION: 4. 1 Deny request to lease a portion of property in Sports Park for the development and operation of a privately owned batting cage facility. 090991.AGN 2 Official Name of Sl2orts Park RECOMMENDATION: 5. 1 Consider a new name for the Rancho California Sports Park. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting, October 14, 1991, 7:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, 92592. Og0991.AGN 3 ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1991 A regular meeting of the Temecula Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order on Monday, August 12, 1991, 7:02 PM at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, Vice Chairperson Evelyn Harker presiding. PRESENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Brode, Harker, Hillen, Nimeshein ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Kirby Also present were Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, Gary King, Development Services Administrator, Herman Parker, Recreation Superintendent, Tad Garrety, Maintenance Superintendent and Recording Secretary Susan Jones. PUBLIC COMMENT None given. COMMISSION BUSINESS I. Minutes Commissioner Hillin amended the minutes of July 8, 1991 as follows: Page 4, last paragraph should read, "Commissioner Hillin suggested that the Rancho Sports Park be renamed, City of Temecula Sports Park, and appropriate signage should be erected. It was moved by Commissioner Brode, seconded by Commissioner Nimeshein to approve the minutes of July 8, 1991, as amended. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Brode, Harker, Hillin, Nimeshein NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Kirby Temecula Rose Garden Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, introduced the staff report and introduced Karen Ortega of the Rose Society to give a presentation. Karen Ortega requested that the City accept approximately 3.45 acres of property on Jedediah Smith Road for a rose garden. Ms. Ortega explained that a portion of this 4/P&RMin/081291 - 1 - 08/19/91 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes Auqust 12, 1991 property has been planted by volunteers in the community. She stated that help with maintenance of this property is needed and its further development would be a great asset to the community, benefiting all age groups. Jean Shetier, 30107 Santa Cecilia Drive, stated that along with the wineries and Old Town, this rose garden could be a drawing point for tourists to the City of Temecula. Virginia Boos, 27850 Sycamore Mesa Road, stated the City has adopted the Rose as its official flower and asked for the Commission's support on this issue. Beverly Curtis, 45616 Classic Way, spoke in favor of City acceptance because it could be of great benefit to various organizations in the community, such as scouts and 4-H clubs. She stated it would be a place of beauty for all citizens of the community. non Henderson, 31832 Poole Court, stated that the roses garden has already brought many people to the community, providing a boost for the local economy. Commissioner Nimeshein spoke in favor of this request, stating the City needs more passive parks. He expressed concern over the Memorial Garden due to its sensitive nature and suggested that the Rose Society maintain control over that section of the garden. Commissioner Hillin stated that although he is in favor of a Rose Garden, he is concerned that the City is in desperate need of more park land, and the development of existing park land, and questioned the ability to fund such a project. Commissioner Brode also expressed concern about the high cost of the Rose Garden when other areas are desperately needed. Karen Ortega stated that the City could take over the existing Rose Garden only at this time for a cost of approximately $18,500/year. Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, suggested that staff aid the Rose Society to apply for a Community Services Funding Grant to aid in operational costs. · Commissioner Nimeshein stated this is an area that crosses all age groups and asked that staff consider a way to accept the donation of the land, but have the Rose Society continue to maintain the Rose Garden. He stated that the volunteers need to make a long-term commitment to the Rose Garden and not expect the City to completely take over the project. Commissioner Hillin expressed concern regarding the City accepting property that can only be used for one purpose. 4/P&RMin/081291 -2- 08/19/91 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes AuquSt 12, 1991 It was moved by Commissioner Brode, seconded by Commissioner Nimeshein to refer this matter to staff with direction to work with the Rose Society in processing a Community Services grant and receive more information from the City Attorney regarding restrictions of usage of the property strictly as a rose garden, and bring this back to the Commission at the meeting of September 9, 1991. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Brode, Harker, Hillin, Nimeshein NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Kirby TCSD Park Use Ordinance Director Shawn Nelson introduced Herman Parker, Recreation Superintendent, to present the staff report. Herman Parker outlined several areas of the proposed ordinance and said he is available to answer any questions the Commissioners may have. Commissioner Nimeshein addressed Section 19, asking if wording could be added to control usage of the park by a large group without a permit. Mr. Nelson stated that according to the ruling of the City Attorney, the City cannot prohibit a group from using the park on a "first come, first served basis". Only when a park is reserved can the City require a "use permit." Commissioner Harker stated she feels that people need an area to ride skateboards and if prohibited at parks, they should be given the opportunity elsewhere. She also stated that under Section 9, Fireworks should be allowed if a special event is approved by the Commission. Ms. Harker also requested that Section 23 be amended to read "motorized" gliders, thereby exempting the little balsa wood gliders that small children enjoy flying. She also stated that hot air balloons are not always able to land where they desire. She suggested changing this provision to read, "City parks shall not be the primary launching area for hot air balloons". Commissioner Hillin asked if this ordinance would be enforceable. Mr. Nelson responded that with an ordinance in place, the Police Department can enforce these rules. Commissioner Harker requested that a police car be visible at the upper south soccer field in Sports Park this Sunday to control the alcohol problem. 4/P&RMin/081291 *3- O8/19/91 Parks and RecreatiOn Commission Minutes AuQust 12, 1991 Shawn Nelson suggested that the skateboard issue be addressed by designating a certain portion of the park for this usage. He suggested that Section 9, regarding Fireworks be changed to read "prohibited unless approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission". It was moved by Commissioner Nimeshein, seconded by Commissioner Brode to recommend to the Board of Directors adoption of Park Use Ordinance No. 91 - with the discussed amendments. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Brode, Harker, Hillin, Nimeshein NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Kirby TCSD Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, gave a report on the status of various CIP projects for the TCSD. He reported Phase One and Phase Two of the Sports Park Ballfield Lighting Project should be complete within the next two weeks. He also reported that the Sports Park Restroom/Snack Bar Project came in with a low bid of $85,201 from Mahr Construction and this will be presented for approval to the Board of Directors on August 13, 1991. Mr. Nelson reported that an expert in development of swimming pools will put together several available options for the $750,000 allocated for a pool. Commissioner Harker asked when the Ad Hoc Committee for the swimming pool would be put into place, stating they should be involved from the beginning of the project. Commissioner Hillin suggested that the Commission appoint an Ad Hoc Committee to work with the community regarding swimming programs and staff would work with actual costs and options. It was moved by Commissioner Harker, seconded by Commissioner Brode to appoint Commissioners Hillin and Nimeshein to the Swimming Pool Ad Hoc Committee. The motion was unanimously carried with Chairman Kirby absent. Donation of Property - West of Via Gilberto Director Shawn Nelson introduced the staff report. 4/P&RMin/O81291 -4- 08/19/91 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes Auaust 12, 1991 It was moved by Commissioner Brode, seconded by Commissioner Nimeshein to recommend to the Board of Directors acceptance of a donation of 2.8 acres of property from Silverwood and H.R. Remington Properties. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Brode, Harker, Hillin, Nimeshein NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Kirby DIVISION REPORTS Gary King, Development Services Administrator, reported that approximately 10 acres have been conditioned for park land from the Meadows Development. He also reported that the first Quimby Fee Check has been received in the amount of $12,780. He stated that other Quimby Fees will be received in the near future for Tract 23142 in the amount of $23,310 and for Tracts 22627 and 22627-1 in the amount of $255,240. He explained the aggressive action the City has taken regarding Quimby Fees which requires fees to be paid at the time of Final Recordation of the Map, instead of at the time building permits are pulled, which enables development of parks at a much quicker pace. Herman Parker, Recreation Superintendent, reported that the Volunteer Program headed by Ruth Chesher, has signed up 30 volunteers to date. He explained these volunteers work on various programs for the City including senior activities, the Mornroy and Me Program and other services needed by the City. Mr. Parker also stated that the Senior Program is ready to begin, with Dance, Arts and Crafts, Handyman Skills, etc. on the agenda. Mr. Parker reported that the Swimming Program is in its final session and has been very successful. Tad Garrety, Maintenance Superintendent, reported that several modifications to the irrigation system at Sports Park were made in June, along with flowers planted around the Veteran's Park sign. He also reported that the Sheriff's Inmate Program has been utilized to trim excessive growth in the river beds due to the heavy rainfall this year. He reported that a bid opening for landscape maintenance was held and staff is very pleased with the low bid from California Landscape. He stated that with the new specifications, much better service will be provided to the City. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT Shawn Nelson reported that two new employees were recently added to the Community Services Staff, Rolph Preisendanz and Beryl Yasinosky. He stated that Purkiss Rose, Consultants for the Master Plan, have nearly completed the inventory of existing parks and staff will be meeting with them to develop a time table for completion of the Community Services Master Plan. 4/P&RMin/081291 ~5- 08/19/91 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes Auoust 12, 1991 Mr. Nelson reported the award for the Sports Park Restroom/Snackbar is on the Board of Directors agenda for August 13, 1991 and the Silverwood Property Dedication will be placed on the agenda for August 23, 1991, PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REPORT Commissioner Nimeshein suggested that Division Reports be given at the beginning of the agenda so staff would not be required to remain for the entire meeting. Commission Hillin stated that on August 24, 1991, the Parks and Recreation Commission will be introduced at the opening ceremonies for the Soccer Association at 2:00 PM at the Sports Park. Commissioner Harker asked for a status report on the Church at Sam Hicks Park. Gary King, Development Services Administrator, stated that he does not have an answer at this time, however, he will at the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Nimeshein, seconded by Commissioner Brode to adjourn at 9:40 PM, to a meeting on September 9, 1991,7:00 PM, Vail Elementary School. The motion was unanimously carried. Michael Kirby, Chairperson Secretary 4/P&RMin/081291 -6- 08/19/91 ITEM NO. 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION SHAWN D. NELSON SEPTEMBER 9,1991 PROPOSED ROSE GARDEN RECOMMENDATION: That the Parks and Recreation Commission: Consider request from Johnson + Johnson Development Corporation and the Temecula Rose Society to accept a donation of approximately 3.45 acres of property on Jedidiah Smith Road and provide maintenance and operation services to the existing roses on the site. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs to maintain the existing roses on the site is estimated at $18,500.00 which includes staffing, utilities, fertilizers, and repairs. It is further estimated that an initial investment of approximately $15,000.00 of improvements will be required to bring the property to safety standards. DISCUSSION: At the August 12, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, the Commission directed staff to analyze the affects of the City designating this site in perpetuity as a rose garden. Further, staff was directed to assist the Temecula Rose Society in obtaining a grant proposal from the City's Finance Department for the upcoming Community Services Funding Program. The City Attorney, Scott Field, stated that the City has the ability to accept a grant deed with the provision of designating the site in perpetuity to be a rose garden. However, Mr. Field recommended that if such an offer were considered, it would be in the best interests of the City to designate a time frame as it relates to the intended use of the property. In addition to the existing maintenance and operation costs, the City's Building and Safety Department inspected the site to determine what improvements would be required, if any, to bring the site up to code. The inspector identified several corrections as it related to the existing improvements. The corrections identified include the following: 1. Asphalt improvements in the parking lot area. 2. 100 amp service improvements. 3. Electric meter improperly weather proofed. 4. Low voltage line needs to be reconnected. 5. Anti-siphon valve needs to be installed, 6. Septic tank needs to be filled and treated. 7. Grading required for water run off. 8. Approximately 10' x 10' parking areas needs to be removed for safety reasons. In addition, dirt piles need to be removed from the parking lot; weeds throughout the entrance area must be removed; fencing improvements need to be completed; walking paths need to be leveled; soils test must be completed to determine that no hazardous materials exist; and rocks and unsafe debris need to be removed from the site. It is estimated that these initial improvements to bring the property to a safety standard to adequately address liability concerns is approximately $15,000.00. I have provided some background information on the proposed rose garden for your review. TEMECULA~VALLEY ROSE SOCIETY PLA~_ JOHNSON FAMILY COMMUNITY ROSE GARDEN JUNE I, 1991THRU MAY 31, 1991 WHAT THE ROSE SOCIETY CAN DO: Assist the City with pruning, obtain donation of roses, and hold monthly arden workshops. We would like to discuss the possiblity of a Memorial Garden to help swell the number of roses we can add each year, but we would want the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Rose Societ] to have control over the Memorial Beds (not routine maintenance but the "how to's" of setting it up}. People in the City of Temecula might want to donate certain items such as benches, sundials, arbors, but the rose society cannot guarantee such donations. REGARDING THE ROSE GARDEN AS IT NOW STANDS: The hydroseeding by Southern California Hydroseed and the borders by Curb Creations, have been donated by local businesses, but have not been developed because they require additional grading. lhe azebo donation has not been formally withdrawn, but the company who had originally hope~ to build us a gazebe is experiencing some financial trouble, and may not be able to honor their committment, The rose society must needs be responsible for obtaining rose donations only. Our endeavors will be much more successful under the auspices of the City of lemecula, as certain growers will donate roses only when they know that c~ty maintenance crews will have the daily a part-time, and in the ~Jture full-time city employee to be in charge of the rose garden. The City of San Diego has a full-time rosarian in charge of daily maintenance on the Balboa Park Rose Garden which holds onl~ 2,500 roses. This person has the assistance of city crews on weeding and spraying and pruning, and the San Diego Rose Society members come out in force one weekend in January to help prune all the roses. However, we can say that we have heard that the America the Beautiful foundation will help cover the cost of trees planted on such properties as this rose garden, and that Murrieta Oaks Nursery did say they would donate "some" flowering pear trees to the rose garden. It is not our impression that the lawns or borders donated constitute enough material to cover the entire 3.45 acre property, but only a small area (400 feett of concrete curbin to surround a lawn on the flat part of the property down near Cabri lo road and locate~ in between the two dirt roads which run up the center of the property. The area designated for the concrete curbs must be prepared ahead of time (leveled and trenched) prior to the Curb Creations folks doing their installation. The same goes for the and leveled before There are a number of large rocks on the property which can be incorporated into the design, some of which can be used for a foundation for a gazebe. The concrete piling left over from the bulldozing of phase I must either be buried or removed. If the City of Temecula wants to develop the property slowly over the course of five years, something needs to be done for weed control in the areas adjacent to rose planting. However, the native scrub can be left in place until the year just prior to planting, rather h than grade t e entire pro erty, which does not seem environmentally sound. The resulting erosion could wash away p~ntings down below on such a sloping property. TVRS PROPOSED PLAN: June 1, thru August 31, 1991: Request donation roses from growers (approximately 1,000 roses per year for the next 5 years). Lay out beds once land is c 'l ,g~n ~:Isl ~ beds. society will be available in 1 c ' We can hope to add roses to approximately I acre per year, but arklands can be created without having to wait for donation roses. If the City of Temecu~ wishes the to develop rose garden in less time, the roses would have to be purchased at an approximate cost of $3 per rosebush. The Heritage roses ordered in 1990 ma be available for lanting by January of lgg2. If -o, then the h~llside above the already ~anted Phase I should be the first part of the land esignated for grading this summer. T~e areas within 30 feet of the Metropolitan Water Oistrict~s concrete structures should not be planted with anything other than grass, as they have the right to b 'ng heavy equipment up the existin dirt roads. We feel that all the dirt roads should b~left as roads and not try to develop them, but rather build our rose garden and parklands around them. September 1 - November 31, 1991: After the rosebeds are laid out by Mrs, O'Hair with chalk, City work crews can then au er the holes out to a depth of 2' deep by 2' in circumference. lhen into each hole ~he below 9round level. This should be done prior to the rainy season, so rain water can swell "ocking" the valuable rainwater & minerals into each hole awaiting the the so31 polymers up, 1 arrival of bareroot roses. At this point in time, the trenche{ must be dug to bury the pipes for the underground drip irrigation system, unless the City maintenance feels that a sprinkler system would be easier to maintain. Roses can thrive on either drip or sprinklers, but whatever is chosen must be installed prior to the planting of the roses, so that they don't go even one da without being watered right at the beginning. Once the rose roots grow into the soi~ polymers (which takes approximately 3 weeks}, the roses should be put on an automatic timer giving them water every other day until they leaf out, then the water can be cut back. December, Ig91: Hopefully the rains will fall during the month of December. The Rose Society will try to schedule the delivery of the roses beginnin the week after Christmas so that they can soak in B1 solution for a week before the City ~ egins planting in January. January 3 - April, 1992: I of the 1,000 roses due in 1992 so that they can be soaked prior to Stagger the de ivery plantin . Perhaps have 100 roses arrive each week thru April, unless the City has facilities prepares at the site by then for cold stora e. We definitely need a storage shed at the rose garden to store soil amendments, roses, toots, trash containers, etc. We also need permanent restroom facilities, as the Rightway portable toilet is only a temporary donation. Hopefully all the bareroot roses will be planted by mid-March. lhen, as long as they are being watered regularly and weed control is practiced, the 1992 planting just needs time to grow. However, the roses which were planted in 1991 will need regular weekly care to cut spent blooms, trouble-shoot the drip system, and keep the weeds OUt. February 15, 1992: Begin light pruning of the approximately 800 roses planted in 1991. The Temecula Valley Rose Society would like to assist the City of lemecula Maintenance crews in the endeavor by way of holding monthly garden workshops inviting rose society members and the public to attend "hands on" demonstrations of proper pruning methods. lhe rose society cannot promise to prune all the roses, but we can assist the City crews. Sincerely, Karen Ortega President Temecula Valley Rose Society June 5, 1991 ZIP CODE, 92,390 iota 39,000 In{~ian Cmek RAINBOW CANYON VILLAGE qNIESTERAS *t RANCHOS REPRODUCTION WARNING · ~' ~ s~, a OAK · qoure o~ ! .~cTc,. i;;~~mg~ INDIAN Former U.S nwy. 395 ;2 ~, ESTATES ~ ~ E )~UN TEMECULA ROSE GARDEN 1. Inspection of irrigation will be performed by TCSD Staff. 2. Permits must be obtained for any further improvements. 3. Operation and Maintenance Costs. A. Part-time employee 20 hr. @ 10.00 hr. no benefits. $14,000.00. B. Utilities including water, electricity - $1,500.00. C. Fertilizers and chemicals - $1,000.00. D. Miscellaneous repairs - 2,000.00. Total Take Over Costs - $18,500.00. FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS 1. Landscape architect to design park, develop phasing plan, and cost estimate - $3,500.00. 2. Actual construction of entire park site - 3.45 acres which includes construction plans and specifications, formal bid process, building permits, and development costs- 350,000.00 (100,000.00 per acre). If phased, $75,000.00 per year for five (5) years. 3. Operation and Maintenance Costs. A. Full-time employee - 40 hr. week @ $13.50 hr. including benefits. $28,080.00. B. Utilities including water, electricity- $10,000.00. C. Fertilizers and chemicals - 7,500.00. D. Miscellaneous repairs - $10,000.00. E. Total Operations Costs - $55,580.00. MEMO .... TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: SCOFF FI~-I .D SHAWN D. ~ NELSON DIRECTOR OF CO ~C~ AUGUST 20, 1~1 PROPOSED ~C~A ROSE G~ PROPERTY At the August 12, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission requested an opinion from you as it relates to the proposed donation of land. It is stipulated by Johnson + Johnson that if the proposed rose garden property is donated to the City, this site must remain in perpetuity a rose garden. The Commission wondered if such a stipulation could be stated on the grant deed, and if so, what would the ramifications be to the City? For example, if at some distant point in the future, the City decided to change the intent of the property from a rose garden to an active park. Would the City be able to do so? Would the City face legal ramifications? Would you recommend that a fixed period of time stipulated on the grant deed as opposed to stating the site remain a rose garden in perpetuity? Please advise. Thank you for your assistance. Parks and Recreation Commissioners Mark Ochenduszko TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: MARY JANE HENRY SHAWN D. NELSON ~ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AUGUST 13, 1991 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT PROPOSAL Please send a Community Services Grant Proposal to Karen Ortega of the Temecula Valley Rose Society. Their organization would like to make a request funding for FY 1991-92. The following is their address and contact person: Temecula Rose Society Attn: Karen Ortega P.O. Box 1673 Temeeula, CA 92593 (714) 676-1999 Thank you for your assistance. ITEM NO. 3 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION SHAWN D. NELSON SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 PARK PROPERTY ON LA SERENA WAY RECOMMENDATION: That the Parks and Recreation Commission: Defer any discussions with the Ridgeview Homeowners Association to lease the property on La Serena Way for a Christmas Tree Farm until the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed, DISCUSSION: On September 18, 1990, the Board of Directors directed staff to prepare the necessary documents to accept a 3.47 acre property on La Serena Way and enter negotiations concerning the possibility of leasing the property to the Ridgeview Homeowners Association for a Christmas Tree Farm. On November 5, 1990, I prepared a staff report recommending that the Board of Directors accept the La Serena property and reserve its use as open space until the Parks and Recreation Master Plan was completed. This recommendation was unanimously approved by the City Council. This site has been identified as a potential equestrian trail due to a Metropolitan Water District easement that runs transversely through the site that could link this property to northern trails in the City. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan is scheduled to be completed within six (6) months. On September 16, 1991, this item will also be on the Planning Commission agenda for the City to receive a land interpretation of the property and its best use. Enclosed is background information concerning this property for your review. MEMO .... TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS SHAWN D. NELSON (~ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AUGUST 21, 1991 PROPERTY ON LA SERENA WAY The Ridgeview Homeowners Association and the La Serena Homeowners Association desires to have the City sublease this 3.47 acre property on La Serena Way, northwest of Veterans Park, to the Ridgeview Homeowners Association to develop a Christmas Tree Farm on the site. This item was discussed by the City Council on September 18, 1990. Staff was directed to pursue acquisition of the property and enter into negotiations with the homeowners association to sublease the property. On November 5, 1990, I presented a staff report to the City Council recommending that the property be accepted by the City and that it be designated as a potential trails site. I stated this would be determined when the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed. This recommendation was unanimously approved by the City Council. This item will be on the agenda for the September 9, 1991 Commission meeting. I have enclosed some background information for your review. If you have any questions, please contact me at 694-6480. Dave Dixon Mark Ochenduszko TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors David F. Dixon, City Manager November 5, 1990 Acceptance of Donated Property APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER Prepared By: Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept donated property containing Metropolitan Water District Easement for possible future park development. FISCAL IMPACT.' No fiscal impact due to the property being donated. However, if developed, monies will need to be budgeted for maintenance and operation. DISCUSSION: On September 18, 1990, the City Council authorized staff to execute the necessary paperwork to accept this donated property containing a Metropolitan Water District Easement for possible future park development. This undeveloped, narrow parcel on La Serena Way could be integrated into a city-wide trails system that will be designed when the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed. CSD Minutes November 27, 1990 , ,, ~.. Acceotance of Donated Property Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, stated this parcel contains a Metropolitan Water District Easement, and said it is north of La Serena Way, between the La Serena and Ridgeview Developments. He recommended the Board accep[ this donated property and hold it until completion of the City-wide master plan, He explained this property could possibly be used as a part of a City-wide bike path and trail system. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Mu~oz to accept donation of property (3.47 acres) located off La Serena Way, containing a Metropolitan Water District Easement for possible future park develepment. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall None None COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. '-' '~"' ~ "" ~,'F~ ~ 'e--~ · ¢:'% .o. 4-'I -i iZ:·. ~.~ ~,~,,o.- '-- ~k ~ ..... ~."' ~,;.,~ ,~ ....,~.~f' ~ -,.: . - ~ --.'. !.,~ ,~ mL, ,C.; ,,, 14 ~ ~ ] rle~tr A/~ 74~1 / 9 ' !a t" l I /~ I EXN(Brr ,m,. ~ M~4Y 17, 1.9~O EXHIBIT "B" c~3G51 Ciw Council M~nute / Seotember 18 990 ' ' 16. De$~ tion of 11 g Deleoete or eaque ,o California. itie$ Annual ,::ej~~on said~e~na~e cachose if ,, ,. ,0 .,...0,.: · AYES: 5 COUNCI MBERS: irdsall, Lind ans, Moo ABSENT: 0 COUNCILM BERS: N e 17. Acouis~ion of Park Land~ City Manager Dixon recommended staff 0ursue acquisition of Orope~ offered by Bedford Prope~ies. He also stated that Metropolitan Water District does have right-of-way for their pipelines on this prope~. Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 9:15 PM. The meeting was reconve~ed at 9:17 PM. Joe Pribanic, 30929 Calla Pina Colada, atated he is in opposition of the City acquiring this property for use as a public park. He said the topography of this land does not lend itself to a park. He stated property owners have had trouble with drugs and vandalism in this area and the strip of land would be virtually impossible to patrol. He asked that the Council not accept this property. John Cloughen, 41304 Bravos Court, Secretary/Treasurer of the Ridgeview Homeowners Association, stated the homeowners are opposed to this property being used as a City park. He advised the City Council that the Ridgeview Homeowner., Association has been offered this property by Bedford Properties for development of a tree farm for a joint venture with La Serena Home Owners Association. Ninutes\8\18\fO o 13- 0~12&/90 City Council Minutes Seotember 18, 1990 James Donart, 41300 Bravos Court, said this propert~ must have a road maintained down the center for access by the Metropolitan Water District. He also stated that due to the configuration of this land, it is very difficult to supervise and asked that the City Council not acquire this land for use as a park. Jim Williems, 27425 Ynez Road, stated he seconded everything that has been said before him. Terry Cordell, 41284 BraVos Court, objected to public use of this property, stating it cannot be supervised and he has had problems in the past with vandalism. Kim Muscato, 41365 Bravos Court, stated she is also in opposition to this land becoming a City Park. Karin Pavlovsky, 30911 White Rocks, President of the Ridgeview Homeowners Association, stated the association has voted to support the cooperative development of this site as a tree farm. She stated the association is in opposition to staff's proposal. She also said it would not be appropriate for Bedford to receive credit for a perk for this unusable property. Councilmember. Birdsall asked if a representative ~f the La Serene Homeowners Association is present. Mr. Cloughen said that there is not a representative tonight, but he met with the association and they favor the joint venture for a tree farm. Councilmember Mu~oz suggested the City acquire this land and lease it back to the homeowners association at a nominal fee. This would enable the City to obtain open space which is needed also. By doing this it would serve both needs. Councilmember Lindemans said the City is in desperate need of parks but stated the City needs to purchase usable land. Councilmember Moore expressed the desire to use this land for possible walking and bike trails or a skate board park. Mayor Parks said that he understands this site has been used for many years been a nuisance to the surrounding property owners and stated he felt it would be better to allow the homeowners association to have this particular piece of land. NIr~tes\l\l;t\f4 - 14,- Citv Council Minutes Seotember 18.1990 It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to direct staff to pursue acquisition of the property offered by Bedford Properties with the provision that the City will enter into negotiations to sub- lease the property to the Ridgeview Homeowners Association for an undefined period of time. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COIjNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Parks asked that the Council reorder the agenda and that Item No. 18 be then B~ salaries for the tions could the new A and ~horize stat lunity IH nutes\8\18\~O - 1 $ - 0~/21,/~0 (3,,'or the Last /ear o~r Dca, ,,' of directcrs, aLc,~g wL!ih the :",icgevie~ Homeo~ners nest., has been discussZn~ A p~opes.a~ ~ith a potential lessee to consider the oossibiilzies cf using :he unStop, dyed acreage ~et~een the Ridgevle~ .~nd La Serene Homeo~ners ~ssociations as an area to Term trees. 'Fhe partlculars are undeveloped. Our board had :been ,~tta,npting to find some ideas that would Out the land to gooC use ~itbout compromising our non-Orofit status or the NeLlare of Che residents of the tract. For this reason the proposal was Nelcomed...it seemed that the ~evelopment of a Christmas tree farm cn this property could be impleme~te~ xn a manner that would be beneficial on both counts. There are 15,5 acres of land to be considered on the p~rt of La Serena, 4.5 acres that abut the easement and 11 acres that serve as a buffer between the northern homes cf La Serene and the Meadowview homes above them. This land, s/:t~ng unused, has been troublesome for several reasons. It has been an area where children and adults from several parts of the community have gone to pitch tents, smoke cigarettes and, upon occasion, use drugs. It is especially convenient because it is virtually i~possible to see what is taking place there because of the design of the tract, the fences bnat obstruct the view to that area, and the fact that the Mqadowview homes are sitting higher up with their homes backing uD the oOen area. ~e have had several fires as a result of the misuse of this ~roperty. While they have not been serious, they serve as a reminder that there is an above-average chance that a fire could occur, endangering the homes and property 5urrounciGg this area. This open space is kept in a natural 5tote, and we do disc it annually; however, we believe that using it in a manner that would retain the ~reen-belt feel ~nd reduce the fire hazard that exists in its present sta:e ~ould be to everyone's benefit. hen ~imDly weed abatemen'. i L :eeP~ :hac this would De mDre :>enePi,:ial to all Darri.e~ ,:u,'~Te, ~-ec. F[nancial!'~, L.~ 3e,-en~ ,~ould Oemefit by hav~nQ: n,e ,,Jc~t~oP31 fun~s ~Fansferred tc ~ ~c: 3nhancement frcm the ~: , iC,,j~,D~ ~3.: {.D3t'5 J'~,l ~r~cbec rr3 ~'eec a~atement. etc =: ~.=.1-: ~ t ~,Dt.h La ?e, ,~n;~ ~nd "'ffadoa~iew ~ould oenefZc as L,SLi'ig ~h~3 Jr.~e~,-b,el~ F,:r' ~ ~rlLr],~ 'n;'isbaa3 t, ees In hlnc'si~bt, we should have taken the ,,o~a ~,'.d in the follow-up thereafter, ~e fsl~ ,~ time, no~aver, that ~e haa little ~o off9c in the ~ay sf addLng any fnsigh~ due ~o the fac~ that talks ~i~h the inLerested lessee 'ned been ~ith Riagevie~ and, following the vo~e off the City Council, ~e believed the framework had been sec to proceed. ~e were aware that one of the RiOgeview homeowners had ipoken out against this ~roposal in October 1990, but ~e did ~oc think that this would alter' the decision passed the ~reviojs month by the City Council. ~e were satisfied that adequate researc~ had been done by the Ridgeview Assn. regarding the viability of the development of a Christmas tree farm anO its implications to us. ~e took 'the position that it would be appropriate to allcw the Ridgeview Assn. to handle the process of developing terms to be considered until more concrete details were in pl~ce since RiOgeview had been in contact with the potential lessee and various city agencies from the beginning. ~e fel~ that once a ~ell-defined plan was in place, we would review all the factors and negotiate from that point, if necessary, ~nd proceed accordingly. From the perspective of the board of La Serene, and as members of the community at large, we acknowledge the need for the city to acquire l~nd for public use, be it for a cr~l system or a more conventional park. However, we have concerns that we feel need to be addressed. namely: {r~) There are $ private parks in the La Serene tract :tself, some of which are already being used by people other than those who reside in the tract. This misuse may increase should you decide to develop the area ~n ~ues;ion as public land. Zf you felt that this could be solved by building some noracorners it, ~idgevie~ ~nose b.~c ~yaras a~-e enclosed b/ wrought iron fences, and t~e honeowners cf Ma,~dowvie~ who have invested in land thac ;:i'ov_d~'~ ~ se,qs8 3f open spaciousness ~hich ~ill li,ely be t~Fen a~ay if f~nces 3r ~alls start being erected. N.~y =r,,rr! C -e 3 ,~a D~lng prcao-:e,j ~3 :~ :DOCeF, tial ~ct De betLe,- to al]ow fcr a plan that ~o'31d no: cFaw ant nDr~ people t.o this ~ar'zicular szr'etcn of ~ne city? Vetei'an's P~,k 1.,> .coo:e,: v<,. tt.a/ly ,.~c -oss La (C) You may consioer ths possibility of claiming the green-belt ~rea that exists between La Serene and Meadowview under imminent domain, We feel this would be unwise because you would be declaring this area for public use despite limited visibility and no vehicular access, perhaps resulting in security problems for the residents of La Serena and Meadowview. If there was ever an emergency, be it medical or fire, access by the appropriate city departments would be minimal at best. The green-belt area ends at the rear boundary of Rancho Elementary, bringing up further .considerations, i.e. security of life and property. The proposed figures we have regarding money between the association and the potential lessee (approximately $167 per acre per year for the first ~ years and then $500 per acre per year thereafter) represents monetary benefit, although we feel that in no way could this be considered a "windfall." ~e ~oulO like to have the chance to use this money to upgrade and enhance the tract in ways that would not only benefit the residents, but also the city. ~dmittedly, La Berena is less attractive than other tracts in Temecula. This is due in part to its relative age, and perhaps the lack of vision of earlier boards. We have been trying to rectify this problem, but it is a slow.process due largely to limited funds. Every bit countS. You may entertain the thought of having the city lease the land to the individuals interested in using the area to farm Christmas tress. If you do not claim the green-belt area under imminent domain, you prevent us from being able to fulfill our desire to use it ~isely because of the lack of access. If you do claim the green-belt area, you leave us vulnerable to all the potential hazards addressed above. Finally, we are certain your intentions are motivated by good will. Unfortunately, we have no idea if future council- members will be so motivated. While the same may be said for the various boards involved, the association boards will, ,zr',,ang.~S ~ili .3ffscL b.,~.~ use cf ~ssoci,at[on dues .3f ~I~..,se Living in our- tract. We inland to ci,'cuJ Ar-=- ~ ,c;,ati Bion ar,lor~g ,bur nOmeO~nerS ,m,-.' residents, and ~e ,,ill fc, r~,4.&rd a copy to you ]Don :ts r,-,:D[etion. In ctos~n~a, r ,,-,c,.Ld Zi~-e ~ha City COur'cil to ,j ~de, rs~and that the e;card QF C~ir~ector=. of ~ha I_'~ Serena :lk_r,7 s f 1,.a~ ,'jecl$i,an i.~ Four ~ugust 2~t~ CSD meetinj. W~ ~,sj/d uDDr~Ef~e hearing from you on this matter. Sincerely, ~uss Warren Preszdent, ~oard off Directors ca ~erena Horneowners Association cc: O. Dixon S. Nelson/ ITEM NO. 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION SHAWN D. NELSON SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 SPORTS PARK BATTING CAGE PROPOSAL RECOMMENDATION: That the Parks and Recreation Commission: Deny request to lease a portion of property in Sports Park for the development and operation of a privately owned batting cage facility. DISCUSSION: Staff has been approached by Developers Venture Capital Corporation (DVCC) to develop and operate a batting cage facility in Sports Park. All design, specifications, and development costs of this facility would be paid by DVCC. DVCC has requested that a legal description be drawn to lease a portion of property in Sports Park for ten (10) years. A percentage of gross revenues would be negotiated between the City and DVCC in consideration of the City providing the land. The only location that has not been designated for future development in Sports Park is north of the playground area adjacent to the access road to the Upper South Soccer Field. After touring the location with representatives from DVCC, staff requested that DVCC respond to concerns that related to parking, lighting, restrooms, security, aesthetics, and noise. I have enclosed a response from DVCC as it relates to these concerns. The reasons for recommending denial of this proposal are as follows: .1. Increased Parking Requirements. There is currently inadequate parking to accommodate the existing needs at Sports Park. This facility will create an even greater need for parking. Users of the batting cage will park where residents currently park to use the playground area which will further congest that area. Additional Lighting. The TCSD has installed ballfield lights with glare shields to reduce upward spill light and glare associated with light usage. Further, a strict curfew of 10:00 P.M. has been implemented with weekend night usage virtually eliminated. The batting cage will be operated year round in the evenings and weekends. This will create a substantial increase in evening lighted activity at the park throughout the year. Additional Restroom Requirements. This facility will create the need for a a restroom facility in that area. The proposal does not include providing a restroom facility. Additional Security Problems. This facility will be operating, at times, when no other activities are scheduled at the park. Evening operations will attract unsupervised users at the park. It is proposed that one person operate the control booth. One person can not adequately provide supervision of the park. Aesthetics. The netting will be seen from Rancho Vista Road and from the residents who live in Starlight Ridge. The center pole for the netting will be forty (40) feet in height with a light at the top of the pole. It is felt that the natural open background of the mountains is a better setting for the park than a batting cage facility. Increased Noise. The hitting of baseballs and softballs will be heard on a regular basis by the surrounding property owners, as well as related noises associated with evening usage. A presentation will be made by Fred Schreyer and Stanley Valentine of Developer Venture Capital Corporation concerning this proposal. REAL ESTATE INVESTORS Auaust 7, 1991 Mr. Gary L. Kina Park Development Coordinator City of Temecula 43180 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Dear GarY: As reaards the matter of the AUTO!t~TED BATTING CAGES presentation to the various denartmental directors, we are enclosing two presentation boards and several cooies of the area schematic for your presentation to your contemuoraries. We felt there were iust a few matters that miaht stand further clarification at this point. NOIBB We have been in contact with the eaui~ment manufacturer who has had considerable experience in actual installations. We are assured that the noise decibel level has never proven to cause any problem to surroundino areas. The machinery is extremely quiet in operation. LIONTING The system utilizes relatively few lights for nightime operation, and, in deference to the Palomar Observatory situation, we would install only low presssure sodium lighting. The nearby trees will even further shield any excess ambient light from any nearby residential areas. SAFETY/SECURITY The batters are enclosed on three sides b? chain ~ink caaes. The ~erimiter of the entire cage system is surrounded by chain link fencin~ to a minimum heiaht of ten feet. The entire inside o~ the caoe system is lined with nettina which diverts the balls into the retrieval system. This areen tinted nettino is held back from the chain link fencina b~ several feet which prevents children from puttin~ their fin~ers throuah the chain link and beina hit by balls. Batters must wear safety helmets which are provided by operator. Only one batter is allowed within the individual battina ca~e at any time. At night, the entire system is locked and security liahted bv same low pressure sodium lighting. Since there is no cash involved ~token operated control panels are utilized), the system has a low security profile beine operated by one Person from the control booth/office. -two- MAINTENANCB/OPERATIONS Daily nmintenance consists of sweepinq and/or washdon of the retrieval area and qeneral policinq of the surrounding cage areas. Operational hours will be mutually aqreed upon after takinq into account school participation, league participation, seasonal factors, and City requirements. One full time employee backed up by a maintenance helper for peak hours should be adeauate. All operations will be controlled from the control booth/office. INST~IJ~TION TI~/~BLg Upon qrantinq of buildinq permits, we can complete construction within sixty days. Our only unknown areas of concern are availability of qradinq and utility installation. We will require a minimum of two 220 volt circuits, adequate water service for washdown and landscape mintenance, and telephone line service. This can all be resolved in a meeting with your engineering people. Gary, we feel this concept will prove to be optimum use of a relatively small area within your Sports complex. This clean use oriented to our citizens and their children through school team, park & recreation proqramu, young adult hardball and softball leagues, and families who normally enioy the benefits of the overall sports complex. We plan to build and operate an attractive and lonq lasting enterprise that both the City of Temecula and D.V.C.C. can be very proud We await the outcome of your deliberations and look forward to workina With you in the future. Fred C. 8chreyer / Sincerely yours, Valentine ITEM NO. 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION SHAWN D. NELSON SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 OFFICIAL NAME OF SPORTS PARK RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Consider a new name for the Rancho California Sports Park. DISCUSSION: At the August 12, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, the Commission requested that staff place on the agenda the issue of possibly renaming the Rancho California Sports Park. Enclosed is a copy of the Naming Policy For City Parks for your review. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities PURPOSE To establish a uniform policy and procedure that identifies criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities. POLICY The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the selection of names for parks and recreation facilities. Once a name is selected, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for ratification. Staff will be responsible for encouraging citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names that will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration. At a minimum,. each park and community building will be designated a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swimming pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall be given a name which might be perceived as controversial by the co/nmunity. All names selected shall be acceptable and meaningful to a majority of the neighborhood/community where the park or recreation facility is located. Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical locations, historic significance or geologic features. No park shall be named for a person, except where an individual has made a significant financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of the park or facility, or has been an outstanding long-time community leader who has supported open space and recreational activities. All park and recreation facilities will be designated a formal name within six months of acquisition or construction. All parks shall have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a plaque inside the facility for name identification. The name of a park or recreation facility may be changed only after a public hearing is held by the Commission to receive community input and direction. No name shall be changed unless there is significant justification and support by the community. RESPONSIBILITY ACTION Department Park and Recreation Commission Department 1. Acquires a new park or recreation facility. 2. Solicits possible names from community. 3. Forwards suggested names to the Park and Recreation Commission for consideration. 4. Receives any additional community input. 5. Selects a name for the new park or recreation facility. 6. Forwards name to City Council for ratification. 7. Installs the appropriate naming sign or plaque. AGENDA TEMECULA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD A T VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute Chairperson Kirby ROLL Brode, Harker, Hillen, Kirby, Nirneshein PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary, When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address, For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Parks and Recreation Secretary before the item is addressed by the Commis- sion. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 090991 .AGN by the City of Temecu~e In the City Cierk's OffiCe~ Ind "'""07:" DIVISION REPORTS COMMISSION BUSINESS Al2Droval of Minutes - August 12, 1991 RECOMMENDATION: 1. I Approve minutes of August 12, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting as submitted. Ternecula Rose Garden RECOMMENDATION: 2. 1 Consider request from the Temecula Rose Society and Johnson and Johnson Development Corporation to accept approximately 3,45 acres of property on Jedediah Smith Road for a rose garden. Park Prol~erty on La Serena Wav RECOMMENDATION: 3. 1 Defer any discussions with the Ridgeview Homeowners Association to lease the property on La Serena Way until the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed. S~2orts Park Battint7 Caqe Pro~7osal · DISCUSSION: 4. 1 Deny request to lease a portion of property in Sports Park for the development and operation of a privately owned batting cage facility· 090991 .AGN 2 Official Name of Sports Park RECOMMENDATION: 5. I Consider a new name for the Rancho California Sports Park. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting, October 14, 1991, 7:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, 92592. 090991.AGN 3 AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA TEMPORARY COMMUNITY CENTER - 27475 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE SEPTEMBER 10, 1991 - 7:00 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM Main Conference Room - Temecula City Hall; 43174 Business Park Drive, Closed session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to discuss Personnel Matter and Government Code Section 54956.9{c) regarding potential litigation. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 91-35 Resolution: No. 91-89 CALL TO ORDER: Invocation Reverend Joan Rich Egan Church of Religious Science Flag Salute Councilmember Lindemans ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC FORUM This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 6 7 Reduce Faithful Performance Security for Parcel MaD No. 22610 RECOMMENDATION: 6, 1 Accept completion of street improvements and authorize the reduction in street Faithful Performance Security amount. 6.2 Approve the subdivision agreement rider, 6.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Trust Deposit in the reduced amount and direct the City Clerk to so notify the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Final Parcel MaD NO. 23335 (Property located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road,) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No, 23335 subject to the conditions of approval. 8 Final Parcel MaD No. 24232 (Property located on the south side of Nicolas Road and east of Calle Medusa) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24232, subject to the conditions of approval. 9 Final Parcel MaD No. 26036 (Property located on the south side of Enterprise Circle West and east of Rider Way) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 26036 subject to the conditions of approval. 13 Change of Zone No. 15. Tentative Parcel MaD NO. 26488 A proposal to rezone 4.5 + \- acres located at the southeasterly corner of Walcott Lane and Calle Chapos from R-A 2-1/2 (Residential Agricultural) to R-1-1 (Single Family Residential). RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Change of Zone No. 15 13.2 Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 26488 14 Soecial Events Permit Resolution RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, SIDEWALKS, OR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Underarounding of Utility Lines and Interim Widenine of Ynez Road (Continued from the meeting of August 27, 1991) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Consider undergrounding the existing overhead facilities and constructing two exterior lanes to ultimate design specifications to provide four (4) travel lanes on Ynez Road. DISTRICT BUSINESS ADoointment of Seven (7) Member Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Appoint seven (7) members and one alternate to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Committee. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Chanoes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1991. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 1991. 2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 BUDGET AS DETAILED IN ATTACHMENT "A" COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting September 24, 1991, 8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California 4 Owner Participation Rules and Relocation Guidelines RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve and adopt the "Rules Governing Participation and Re-entry Preferences for Property Owners, Operators of Businesses and Tenants in the Agency Project Areas" and the "Relocation Assistance Rules and Guidelines of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula". 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA, ADOPTING RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND RE-ENTRY PREFERENCES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES AND TENANTS IN THE AGENCY PROJECT AREAS 5 6 4.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO RDA 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA, ADOPTING RELOCATION ASSISTANCE RULES AND GUIDELINES Agency Personnel Rules and Policies RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL RULES AND POLICIES Adoption of Aaencv Bylaws RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING BY-LAWS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY.