HomeMy WebLinkAbout021899 CC/RDA Jnt. Workshop AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
A JOINT TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WORKSHOP MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
FEBRUARY 18, '1999 - 6:00 P.M.
5:00'P~:Mi. - CloSed Session of the' :City Council and RedeVel0pment Age=n'Cy .pursuant
· to Government Code Sections (Special Meeting forS:00. P.M. Closed .Session):
'1. Conference with.~!:eal .property .negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956,8 concern=iiig:;.~the acquisitioit.' of real property:lOcated at!;,~2~8:72'1 Front Street,
Teme:CUla (APN' !~'073-017 and"§2:2~0046-022 aii~:;.i=;922-073-0~i4). Th:e::;~gotiating
parties' are the,.Redevelopment Agency of the .City.;~f;:Temecu!~'.and .Flight and Front,
LLP and Cleveland Investment Company. Under negotiation is the price and terms of
payment to the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The Agency/City
negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Meyer.
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Councilman Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
R:~Agenda\021899
1
CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency on matters
not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will
be devoted to these reports.
COUNCIL AND AGENCY BUSINESS
1 Workshop Discussion on Traffic Improvement Proiects
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve a plan for study and implementation of various traffic improvement projects.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 23, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\021899
2
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01
Resolution: No. CSD 99-02
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 9, 1999.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 23, 1999, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar,
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\021899
3
ITEM
1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
DATE:
City Council / Redevelopment Agency
Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager
February 18, 1999
SUBJECT:
Workshop Discussion on Traffic Improvement Projects
Prepared by: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~" ~-v ""
?
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council / Redevelopment Agency approve a plan for
study and implementation of various traffic improvement projects
BACKGROUND: At your January 21, 1999 workshop, the Council / Agency approved priorities
for a variety of capital projects. These projects were:
1. Various Redevelopment Projects - Old Town Area
2. 1"t Street Bridge
3. Category "1" Traffic Improvement Projects
4. Murrieta Creek Crossing - North of Winchester
5. Murrieta Creek Crossing - South of Winchester
6. Realignment of Diaz Rd. North of Rancho California Rd.
7. Request that Caltrans redesignate I-15 from Rural to Urban Freeway
8. Work with developers to expedite construction of Meadows Parkway
This workshop is intended to build upon the January 21 workshop. Specifically, staff plans to
provide the Council / Agency with an update as to the progress of current construction
projects, as well as an update on the above projects. The focus of this workshop, however,
will be to discuss the Category "1" Traffic Improvement Projects. Staff has continued to
review these potential projects, and will be prepared to more completely describe these
projects, the factors that will be considered in determining the final feasibility of the projects,
and recommend an implementation process.
FISCAL IMPACT: At the January 21, 1999 Workshop, $250,000 was allocated for Category
"1" Traffic Improvements. The estimated costs of the Category "1" improvements are
expected to be within this amount. The appropriate budget adjustments will be included in the
mid-year budget.
ATTACHMENT: January 21, 1999 Workshop minutes.
11TEMEC_ FS201 IDA TA IDEPTSI CITYMGRIOGRAD YJI CIP WORKSHOP. FEB 18, 1999. DOC
2/11/99
MINUTES OF A JOINT TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL,
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING
JANUARY 21, 1999
A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council, Community Services District, and
Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 6:03 P.M. in the City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ford presiding.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone*,
and Ford.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
* - Councilman Stone arrived to the meeting at 6:12 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT/AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REPORTS
In light of a recent City Council discussion regarding the extension of Meadows Parkway,
Councilman Lindemans requested that the matter be discussed this evening.
No Council objection was noted with regard to discussing the Subsequent Need Item (as noted
below).
Agenda Item No. 2 was discussed out of order.
Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Equipment
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
That the City Council authorize consideration of this Item as a Subsequent Need
Item pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 because the need to consider
this Item arose after the agenda for this meeting was posted (although this Item was
posted 48 hours prior to the meeting), and the City Council must act on this prior to
the close of escrow for the sale of the property which will occur prior to the next
meeting;
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
Minu~s~12199 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, MODIFICATION, AND
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE
PROMENADE MALL PROJECT
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks reviewed the staff repod (as per agenda material),
advising that title reports have been checked to verify owners of record.
For Mayor Ford, City Attorney Thorson clarified that the Development Agreement with Forest
City granted Forest City the authority to assign portions of the Agreement and that it had been
anticipated that there would be other Forest City-related entities which would be holding title to
certain portions of this property.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with
the exception of Mayor Pro Tern Stone who was absent.
At this time, discussion followed with regard to Agenda Item No. 1.
1 Workshop Discussion on Capital Improvement Pro.qram Priorities
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Provide Staff with direction as to project priorities;
1.2 Approve in concept a plan for staff resources for current construction projects.
Acting City Manager Nelson reviewed the purpose of this Workshop, advising that a status
report will presented of the current $52 million Capital Improvement Projects; that additional
funding sources, which are currently not committed within the City's Capital Improvement
Projects, will be identified; that unfunded Capital Improvement Projects will be presented for
discussion ranging from Capital Projects, Public Facility Projects, and Redevelopment Projects;
that staff will provide a recommended Work Plan as it relates to the Capital Improvement
Projects which will then create the basis of discussion as to prioritization; and that staff is
requesting direction as to the Staffing Plan in order to expedite the fo~hcoming projects.
Considering the available resources, Mr. Nelson commended the Public Works Department on
an outstanding job.
As per PowerPoint, Senior Engineer Hughes proceeded with the Traffic Project Status Report
(copies of record), advising that a 24-hour work day for the Overland Drive Overcrossing
project would require Caltrans' approval and that the contractor for this project has indicated an
objection to a 24-hour work day.
In light of Senior Engineer Hughes' comments, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the 24-
hour workday be further addressed to ensure the simultaneous completion of the Overcrossing
and the Mall. Mr. Stone suggested that additional incentives be explored and offered to the
contractor in order to provide for a 24-hour work day.
Minutes\012199 2
Acting City Manager Nelson noted that he has discussed the Overcrossing with Mr. Bob Lopez,
representing Southern California Edison, to ensure cooperation with the contractor of the
project as to the relocation of Southern California Edison facilities as well as expeditious
handling of the project and noted that staff will further pursue and discuss the possibility of
incentives with the contractor in an effort to provide a 24-hour work day.
Noting that the contractor relayed confidence that he would be able to complete the project
within the specified time by working a 6:30 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. work schedule, Senior Engineer
Hughes noted that staff will continue discussions with the contractor. To avoid any delays, Mr.
Hughes advised that staff has been communicating with Southern California Edison as to the
relocation of SCE facilities. In an effort to further expedite the project, Mr. Hughes informed the
Councilmembers that staff has been exploring other measures to reduce the project time such
as an alternative retaining wall design which would reduce the settlement period as well as the
cost.
Councilman Comerchero concurred with Mayor Pro Tem Stone to provide reasonable
incentives to the contractor to provide a 24-hour work day.
It was the consensus of the City Council to provide an update as to the status of this project.
Senior Engineer Hughes continued with his presentation by reviewing the recently completed
Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) and Capital Improvement Projects currently being
administered by the Public Works Department (as per written material of record).
At this time, Finance Director Roberts provided information with regard to available funding
sources which are currently not committed to the Redevelopment Agency or the City's General
Fund and which could be utilized for various projects, advising that for Redevelopment, staff
has identified $4.7 million comprised of $1.17 million of unallocated tax increments fund
balance, $2.0 million proceeds from the sale of RDA property, and $1.57 million existing
Capital Project Funds.
In the General Fund, Finance Director Roberts advised that staff has identified $2.76 million of
unallocated balance as of June 30, 1998, advising that in total approximately $7.5 million would
be available for traffic, public facility, or Redevelopment projects.
Of the recently completed Capital Improvement Projects, Senior Engineer Hughes noted that
no overages, which would require City Council, have occurred and that the projects are being
completed close the contract price.
At this time, Acting City Manager Nelson introduced the next Agenda Item - Traffic Projects.
By way of handouts, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks reviewed the Traffic Projects
advising that they were divided into three categories as follows:
· Category I - projects which could be completed prior to Mall opening --striping,
signal modifications;
· Category II - projects which could be completed within 6 to 24 months - minor
roadway improvements - raised medians, road widening for right turn lanes, etc.;
· Category III - projects which would required Capital Improvement Projects process
and require additional right of way or major street improvement plans.
Minutes\012199 3
Reviewing Category I in more detail, Mr. Parks advised that 27 projects were identified as a
result of City Council input, staff input, and input from Mr. Bob Davis, noting that the estimated
cost would be $250,000.00.
City Attorney Thorson advised that Mayor Pro Tem Stone must abstain from issues regarding
Old Town projects including the First Street Bridge.
At this time, Senior Engineer Hughes further reviewed Category II projects (short-term projects
within a 2- to 5-year timeframe - as per agenda material of record - as well as new
transportation projects identified by City Council and new future transportation projects identified
during the Circulation Element process.
For Councilman Roberts, Senior Engineer Hughes provided clarification with regard to the cost
associated with the redesignation of I-15 to Urban Freeway with Councilman Roberts
suggesting that a letter be sent to the Riverside County Transportation Committee (RCTC),
requesting specific clarification as to the process of obtaining this redesignation. Mr. Roberts
advised that the Mayor of the City of Murrieta had noted no objection to such a redesignation.
Mayor Ford requested that a letter be sent to the RCTC.
Mr. Hughes proceeded with an overview of those unfunded transportation projects which would
be the most financially viable projects and prioritized them as follows:
· First Street Bridge
· Diaz Road extension
· Murrieta Creek Crossing - north of Winchester Road at Date Street of Cherry Street
· Murrieta Creek Crossing - south of Winchester Road between Rancho California
Road and Winchester Road
· Diaz Road realignment at Rancho California Road
· Pala Road Phase II
· Ynez Road widening from Rancho California Road to La Paz Street
· Pauba Road improvement - Phase II
· Santiago Road extension to Margarita Road
· Margarita Road widening from Pauba Road to Highway 79S
At the January 20, 1999, joint Planning Commission/Traffic/Public Safety Commission meeting,
Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that the two Commissions reviewed the short-term
projects and agreed with the forthcoming recommendation relative to these projects but made
some modifications to the prioritization. Mr. Thornhill clarified that the connection between
Rainbow Canyon Road and Pala Road at the tribal property has been deleted and that staff will
continue to investigate a connection between Rainbow Canyon Road and Pala Road but that it
will not involve the tribal property.
For Mayor Ford, Senior Engineer Hughes confirmed that the La Serena Way from Margarita
Road to Meadows Parkway has been funded.
By way of a worksheet, Assistant City Manager O'Grady reviewed the unfunded park and public
facility projects which include projects in the current Capital Improvement Projects as well as
future Capital Improvement Projects as well as projects in the Capital Improvement Projects but
ones which have not been fully funded.
M in utes\012199 4
Mr. O'Grady as well proceeded with a detailed overview of unfunded park projects such as
Margarita Park Community Center, Northwest Sports Complex (noting that staff will investigate
the Cathedral City park operations), and joint City/Temecula Valley Unified School District pool
project.
For Councilman Lindemans, Assistant City Manager O'Grady noted that financing alternatives
will be explored for the Library as well as the Performing Arts Center.
Advising that the Library Design Committee is proceeding with the design and location of the
future library, Councilman Roberts noted that the design of such a facility or any facility for
which funding is requested must be completed prior to the City being able to apply for
Federal/State grants.
Advising that Councilman Roberts, Mayor Ford, and he will be traveling to Washington in March
to discuss several issues with the City's lobbyist including Library grants, Mayor Pro Tem Stone
noted his preference to obtain grants to construct such a facility versus taxing the residents,
advising that private donors have indicated an interest to donate monies to a City of Temecula
library.
Acting City Manager Nelson advised that the Performing Arts Center was addressed in the
City's Cultural Arts Center Master Plan and that this issue would be addressed by the City
Council at the February 23, 1999, meeting.
Recommending that Redevelopment Agency activities continue, Housing and Redevelopment
Manager Meyer highlighted the following three areas:
· Seismic retrofit of the Mercantile Building - now under Agency ownership
· Existing Agency properties in Old Town to provide additional public parking
· Continue the funding of the facade improvement program, land acquisition, and
related revitalization activities.
Referencing the previous comments, Mr. Meyer noted that staff would recommend that $2
million be set aside for the continued renovation of Old Town.
In light of the aforementioned discussion, Acting City Manager Nelson relayed staff's
recommendation to utilize the identified uncommitted $7.5 million as follows with Deputy
Director of Public Works Parks providing additional clarification:
$2.0 million for Redevelopment Agency projects
First Street Bridge Crossing - reviewed the importance of this project as it relates to
the Circulation Element; advised of the three crossings at Murrieta Creek -
Winchester Road, Rancho California Road, and Main Street; noted that Main Street
is the only crossing into Old Town; that First Street Bridge would replace the Main
Street bridge and provide an alternative route into the residential areas as well as
provide a bypass of Front Street; that the construction of First Street Bridge will allow
traffic to cross the freeway at Santiago Road and SR 79 and create more of a
conduit from the industrial park to relieve traffic congestion at Rancho California
Road and Ynez Road; that the project has been designed and that the City owns the
necessary right-of way; that all Environmental clearances have been completed; and
Minutes\012199 5
that the project, if approved, could go to bid and be completed within a two-year
period.
Category I - $250,000.00
Murrieta Creek Crossing - north and south - complete a feasibility study and have
design completed.
For Councilman Lindemans, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted that the construction
of the First Street Bridge could, for the time being, be in lieu of constructing the Western
Bypass; advised that a study report for an interchange at Santiago Road would take
approximately 2 to 3 years after which the design phase and the construction time would take
approximately 4 to 5 years.
Reiterating the need to complete the design phase prior to the City obtaining any funding,
Councilman Roberts spoke in support of constructing First Street Bridge.
Although speaking in support of constructing the First Street Bridge, Councilman Comerchero
noted that the City Council must consider how the construction of the project may potentially
impact other projects such as extending Santiago Road to Margarita Road.
In response to Mayor Ford, it was noted that if the City were to proceed with the First Street
Bridge that associated striping, signage, and signalization at Santiago Road/First Street/Front
Street has been incorporated into the project budget.
Mayor Ford requested that the Diaz Road realignment be placed on the proposed Work Plan.
For Councilman Comerchero, Acting City Manager Nelson noted that the requested $2.0 million
for Redevelopment Agency which would cover seismic retrofit of the Mercantile Building,
additional parking, and fa(;;ade improvement program, land acquisition, and related revitalization
activities.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve an allocation of $2.0 million dollars to the
Redevelopment Agency and $3.85 million for the construction of First Street Bridge. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with
the exception of Mayor Pro Tern Stone who abstained.
Because the environmental process for the Circulation Element has not been completed, Acting
City Manager Nelson noted that the Council is not being requested to approve it this evening.
Further addressing the north/south interception and impact it may have on the City of Murrieta,
Acting City Manager Nelson encouraged creating an open dialogue with the neighboring City to
ensure the understanding of the mutual benefits of working in together on such projects.
Mr. Bob Davis further commented on the Diaz Road connection at Vincent Moraga Road and
how such a connection would complement the First Street Bridge improvement.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to approve the Category I projects in the amount of
$250,000.00; approve the Murrieta Creek Crossing north in the amount of $700,000.00; approve
the Murrieta Creek Crossing south in the amount of $700,000.00; approve the Diaz Road
realignment in the amount of $810,000.00 (as it relates to RCTC funding); and approve the
redesignation of 1-15 to Urban Freeway. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
M in utes\012199 6
Councilman Lindemans requested that the extension of Meadows Parkway be addressed at the
next City Council Workshop with Deputy Director Public Works Parks advising that Lennar had
completed design plans to construct the extension; that the construction of this extension is to
be split by Lennar and McMillan; that the construction schedule for this project reflects a
completion date of two years.
In order to clarify the City Council's intent, at a previous meeting, with regard to Meadows
Parkway, Acting City Manager Nelson suggested that the minutes as well as the videotape be
reviewed and that the matter be discussed in more detail at the next City Council workshop.
In light of the additionally approved projects (as noted above), it was requested that the City
Council approve additional staffing as follows:
· 4 City full/time employees
- 1 Senior Engineer
- I Associate Engineer
- 1 Assistant Engineer
- 1 Senior Public Works Inspector
· 6 project employees
It was noted that the associated costs to fund these positions would be funded in total for the
next three years through the Capital Improvement budgets under Administrative Section and
that the cost to the City would be less than if the City were to contract these services out.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff's request for the additional staffing
(as noted above). The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberrs and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
In light of this evening's discussion and in light of the past and upcoming improvement projects,
Councilman Comerchero apologized to the Public Works Department for not addressing the
Department's staffing needs prior to now and commended the Department on a job well done.
Acting City Manager Nelson commended the City Council for addressing these difficult issues
and relayed appreciation to the Council's for the support of the additional staffing needs. For
Mayor Ford, Mr. Nelson noted that additional information would be provided to the Council at
the next Workshop with regard to the redesignation of I-15 to Urban Freeway and that a letter
would be sent to RCTC requesting additional clarification as to the redesignation process.
Minutes\012199 7
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:08 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, January 28,
1999, at 7:00 P.M.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
M in utes\012199 8
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 9, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:01
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts,
Stone, and Comerchero.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Crowne Hill/Tract No. 23143 - Prescribing Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service
Level D Rates and Char.qes ('located on the east side of Butterfield Stage Road, south of
Pauba Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH
RESPECT TO PRESCRIBING SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE
LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES
FOR TRACT NO. 23143 AND ITS SUBSEQUENT PHASES
BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 AND SETTING A TIME
AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH
MOTION: Director Stone moved to continue Consent Calendar Item No. 1 to the February 23,
1999, Community Services District meeting. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and
voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
Minutes CSD\020999 I
2 Ratification of Election Results - Tract No. 26488
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT
ELECTION HELD ON JANUARY 22, '1999, DECLARING THE
RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY
LAW
MOTION: Director Roberts moved to adopt Resolution No. CSD 99-01. The motion was
seconded by Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Potential Joint Use of County Flood Control Prol3ertV for Recreational Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve a letter to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District expressing the City's interest in working jointly for the development of
Recreational facilities in the proposed detention facility adjacent to Murrieta
Creek.
By way of overheads, Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (as per
agenda material), highlighting the specifics of such a facility.
Director Ford provided comments with regard to State/Federal funding of such facilities and the
need to change existing legislation to ensure that specified funding for such projects retain local
control.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Advising that the Margarita Park site is currently in the maintenance period, Community Services
Director Parker advised that it should be open to the public in May 1999.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
Minutes CSD\020999 2
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:10 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday,
February 18, 1999, at 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
Minutes CSD\020999 3