HomeMy WebLinkAbout091091 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA TEMPORARY COMMUNITY CENTER - 27475 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE
SEPTEMBER 10, 1991 - 7:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM Main Conference Room - Temecula City Hall, 43174
Business Park Drive, Closed session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to
discuss Personnel Matter and Government Code Section 54956.9(c) regarding potential
litigation.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 91-35
Resolution: No. 91-89
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Reverend Joan Rich Egan
Church of Religious Science
Flag Salute
Councilmember Lindemans
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
2/Nencla/Oe 1280 I 09/0618 1
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1' Approve the minutes of August 20, 1991 as mailed.
3
Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year
ended June 30, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and File Report
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency AQreement
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the amended agreements for the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency.
2/egend~/Oe 1290 2 09/0~/81
Reduce Faithful Performance Security for Parcel MaD No. 22610
7
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Accept completion of street improvements and authorize the reduction
in street Faithful Performance Security amount.
6.2
Approve the subdivision agreement rider.
6.3
Accept the Faithful Performance Trust Deposit in the reduced amount
and direct the City Clerk to so notify the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
Final Parcel MaD No. 23335
(Property located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road.)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 23335 subject to the conditions of
approval.
8
Final Parcel MaD No. 24232
(Property located on the south side of Nicolas Road and east of Calle Medusa)
RECOMMENDAT. ION:
8.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24232, subject to the conditions of
approval.
9
Final Parcel MaD No. 26036
(Property located on the south side of Enterprise Circle West and east of Rider Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 26036 subject to the conditions of
approval.
2/~enddOe 1280 3 01/05/I 1
10
Contract Services - Planning Deoartment
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Authorize a professional service contract with
consultant, pursuant to the attached documents.
Forma, a planning
11
Aoorooriation From Redevelooment Aqencv Revolving Fund
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE
FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND FOR THE ACQUISITION BY
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY GENERALLY KNOWN AS MARGARITA CANYON
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
12
ChanQe of Zone No. 14, Tentative Parcel MaD No. 26845
A proposal to change zone from R-A 2 1/2 to R-A and a four-lot subdivision on 3.68
acres.
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Zone Change No. 14
12.2 Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 26845
2/ege~lNOe 1290 4 08/06/9
13
ChanQe of Zone No. 15, Tentative Parcel MaD No. 26488
A proposal to rezone 4.5 + \- acres located at the southeasterly corner of Walcott Lane
and Calle Chapos from R-A 2-1/2 (Residential Agricultural) to R-1-1 (Single Family
Residential).
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Change of Zone No. 15
13.2 Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 26488
14
Soecial Events Permit Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS ON
PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, SIDEWALKS, OR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15
Underqroundinq of Utility Lines and Interim Wideninq of Ynez Road
(Continued from the meeting of August 27, 1991 )
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Consider undergrounding the existing overhead facilities and constructing two
exterior lanes to ultimate design specifications to provide four (4) travel lanes
on Ynez Road.
2/eeendd081290 6 09/06/81
16
Consideration of Old Town Historic Review Committee
(Continued from the Meeting of August 27, 1991)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Appoint a five (5) member Old Town Historic Review Committee to
operate within the guidelines adopted August 13, 1991.
17
Consideration of Fundine for Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Moore)
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: September 17, 1991,7:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center,
27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: September 24, 1991,7:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community
Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President J. Sal Mur~oz
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mur~oz
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
2/aeendNOe 1290 6 o9/o6/e 1
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Aooointment of Seven (7) Member Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Appoint seven (7) members and one alternate to the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan Committee.
2
Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Chanqes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year
ended June 30. 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 1991.
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 BUDGET AS DETAILED IN
ATTACHMENT "A"
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting
Temecula Community
Temecula, California
September 24, 1991, 8:00 PM, Temporary
Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive,
2/eOendNO 61290 7 09/06/91
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
Chairperson Peg Moore presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
2
3
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 20, 1991 as mailed.
Adoption of Conflict of Interest Code
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CODE
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Procedural Guidelines by the Agency
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT
2/agerdNO61290 8 oe/os/el
Owner Particioation Rules and Relocation Guidelines
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve and adopt the "Rules Governing Participation and Re-entry
Preferences for Property Owners, Operators of Businesses and Tenants
in the Agency Project Areas" and the "Relocation Assistance Rules and
Guidelines of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula".
4.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
ADOPTING RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND RE-ENTRY
PREFERENCES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES AND
TENANTS IN THE AGENCY PROJECT AREAS
5
6
2/e~ende/061290
4.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
ADOPTING RELOCATION ASSISTANCE RULES AND GUIDELINES
AcJencv Personnel Rules and Policies
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
TEMECULA,
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL RULES AND POLICIES
AdOPtiOn of Aqencv Bylaws
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING BY-LAWS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY.
9 0e/06/91
7
Authorization to Purchase Marcjarita Canyon Site
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
AUTHORIZING A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND BEDFORD PROPERTIES
A deposit of $100,000 be used to open escrow;
Funds from the Redevelopment Agency revolving fund be used for the
escrow deposit;
Authorize the Executive Director to enter detailed negotiations and
execute all necessary documents to lease the 2.18 acre portion of the
property zoned M-1 during the escrow period or one year, whichever
occurs first.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting September 24, 1991, 8:00
Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce
Temecula, California
PM, Temporary
Center Drive,
2/ageride/061290 10 09/06/91
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AUGUST 20, 1991
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM
in the Main Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Mayor Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Parks declared a recess to an executive session pursuant to Government Code Section
54956 (b), and 54956 (c), to discuss pending litigation.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:08 PM in regular session by Mayor Parks.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Mu~oz.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Greg Treadwell, representing Granny's Bakery and Country Sore, 27300 "B" Jefferson
Avenue, presented the Council with invitations to joint him at his place of business to discuss
the sign ordinance.
Jane Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, thanked the City Council for their prompt reaction to her
suggestion that traffic directors be used on the Rancho California Road over-crossing on
weekends.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Introduction of Draft Five-year C.I.P. Proaram
City Manager David Dixon introduced the staff report to be presented by Assistant City
Manager Mark Ochenduszko.
Mr. Ochenduszko gave the City Council an overview of the plan and explained that this
document is a planning tool, not a budgetary tool. He outlined that way in which the
Minutes\8/20/91 - 1 - 09/0519 1
City Council Minutes August 20, 1991 "
staff developed the plan and briefly explained the way the sources of funding tables
were prepared. He directed the Council's attention to the Project Description section
of the plan and explained the information contained in each section and the location
maps.
Mayor Parks questioned the reason projects contained in Assessment Districts 159 and
161 are not covered in the program. City Manager Dixon explained that these projects
are not funded or controlled by the City.
Mayor Parks requested that the projects to be performed by Assessment Districts 159
and 161 that are contained within the City's boundaries be included in the Capital
Improvement Plan. City Manager Dixon said staff could add an addendum to include
those projects having a fiscal impact on the City.
Councilmember Lindemans questioned if impact fees for office space, industrial space,
commercial space, etc. were computed per square foot per year. City Manager Dixon
responded that the only impact fees included in the report are for residential
construction and that the assumptions made do not include industrial and commercial
development.
Councilmember Lindemans questioned how the development impact fees were
projected. Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry presented the Council with a spread sheet
detailing the estimated development impact fees for a five year period ending June 30,
1996.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he would like to see staff make comparisons between
collecting industrial/commercial development impact fees versus crediting these against
any industrial/commercial benefits to be derived by the City.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon announced that due to an unfortunate death in her family, Parks
and Recreation Commissioner Harker will not be able to attend the Main Street
Program meeting to be held August 25 through 28. He asked Council to consider if
any of them would be able to attend since all of the travel and accommodation fees
have been prepaid.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
Scott Field reported that Bedford Properties has been working with the County of
Riverside to finalize the surety issue which should allow the bonds for CFD 88-12 to
be issued, hopefully, within the next two weeks.
Minutes\8/20/91 -2- 09/05/91
City Council Minutes August 20. 1991
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Parks requested that staff give an up-date report on the Rancho California Road
widening agreement.
City Manager Dixon reported that one of the major developers, who had previously
agreed to enter into a joint agreement for widening Rancho California Road, has
indicated that they no longer wish to be a participant.
Mayor Parks asked that staff explore contingency plans to accomplish this widening.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
adjourn at 8:10 PM to an executive session to be held at 5:30 PM in the Main
Conference Room at City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, to be followed by a regular
meeting at 7:00 PM in the Temporary Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center
Drive, Temecula. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Birdsall
absent.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\8/2019 1 -3- 0910519 1
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of
$526,284.60
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 10th day of September, 1991.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/R~so 205
a:
uj
,-I-
,_1
t-
UJ
-r
0
Z
0
0
u_
0
,_1
0
r,D C,>
0 0
C,1
Z Z
<
LU ILl
C/)
,_1 ,_1
,_1 ,_1
0 0
U_
LU UJ
LU LU
(,>
LU UJ
LU LU
Fiscal Year: ]992 Check ~egister Station: 3369
Check Date Vendor Name
-- Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
0vu07595 08/14/93 KNOTTS XNOTTS BERRY FARM
081291 08/12/93 08/14/91 TICKETS FOR DAY CAMP 523.50 0.00 521.50
00007687 08/23/93 CHAMBER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
082291 08/22/91 08/05/91
Check Totals:
521.50 0.00 521.50
45,000.00 0.00 45,000.00
Check Totals: 45,000.00 0.00 45,000.00
00007689 08/23/91 ALLIED ALLIED BARRICADE
~36474-00 08/08/91 10553 07/30/91 STOP SIGNS FOR RORIPAUGH TRCT 328.31 0.00 328.31
Check Totals: 328.31
00007690 08/23/91 AMERICAN AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTEMS
08262242 08/01/93 10554 08/01/91 POSTAGE MTR TAPE 126.63
Check Totals: 126.63
00007691 08/23/9i BICKNELL BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
081691 08/16/91 08/05/91 AIRFARE CODE DEV. CONFERENCE 330.59
0.00 328.31
0.00 126.63
0.00 126.63
0.00 330.59
Check Totals:
00007692 08/23/91 BRATSCHI MICHAEL & JEANNIE BRATSCHI
081991 08/19/91 08/19/91 GOLF SESSION I
330.59 0.00 330.59
500.00 0.60 500.00
'7693 08/23/91 BROWRiB BROWN & BIGELON
5447023-26 08/06/91 10191
Check Totals:
05/10/91 NAME BADGES
500.00 0.00 500.00
588.39 0.00 588.39
00007694 08/23/93 CALlFORM CALIFORNIAN
07239~ 07/21/93
Check Totals: 588.39 0.00 588.39
07/21/93 33243 YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION 48.00 0,00 4E.O0
Check Totals:
00007695 08/23/91 COPYLiNE COPY LINE CORPORATION
49630 08/13/91 30547 07/30/91 DEVELOPER FOR COPIERS
48.00 0.00 48.00
629.45 0.00 629.45
00007696 08/23/91DAVLIN DAVLIN
89-23:306 08/20/91 10465
89-23:108 08/20/91 10462
Check Totals:
07/01/91 TAPE COUNCIL MEETING 8/6,8/13
07/01/91 TAPING PKS & REC. AUG 12
629.45 0.00 629.45
634.82 0.00 614.82
130.00 0.00 130.00
Check Totals:
0000769? 08/23/91 DELACUES REGINA DE LA CUESTA
081993 08/19/91 08/19/91T SHIRT PAINTING/SESSIONII
744.82 0.00 744.82
80.00 0.00 80.00
Check Totals:
00007898 08/23/91 DIVERSIF DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY SERVICE
712 07/14/91 10557 07/01/91TEMPORARY~L.L. WE 7/21
80.00 0.00 80.00
320.00 0.00 320.00
~q~7699 08/23/91 FORD SHARON FORD
083993 08/19/93
Check Totals:
08/39./9! MONEY MANAGEME~T/SESSIOK II
320.00 0.00 320.00
80.00 0.00 80.00
Check Totals:
00007700 08/°~/91 FREEMARS FREEMAN'S OFFICE PRODUCTS
133714-~ 07/09/93 ]0343 06/34/93 OFFICE SUPPLIES
80.00 0.00 80.00
93.70 0.00 93.70
Cric<'i: ?ct,~ls: c~ vr C.0(, c~ -.'
08/23/91 City c~ T~ec=!3~ i'ags.
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Register Station: 3369
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
00007701 08/23/9{ GENEP. ALB GENERAL BINDING
]1481455 07/12/91 10414 07/11/91 SPIRAL COMB BINDERS 25.60 0.00 25.60
11484513 08/08/91 10571 08/07/91 COMBS FOR BINDERS,BUDGET/STOK 137.90 0.00 137.90
Check Totals:
00007702 08/23/91GLENNIES GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
132173-1 07/03/91 10508 07/02/91 DESK PADS, LETTER TRAYS
163,50 0,00 163,50
488,14 0,00 488,14
00007703 08/23/91 GLOBAL
11061769
Check Totals:
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES
07/08/91 10369 06/24/91 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
488.14 0.00 488.14
523.13 0.00 523.13
Check Totals:
~0007704 08/23/91 GLOBAL C GLOBAL CITIES PROJECT -
3160 08/05/91 10496 07/17/91 ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDE FOR OOVMT
523.13 0.00 523.13
193.05 0.00 193.05
Check Totals:
00007705 08/23/91GOVTFINO GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A
59156 07/08/91 30395 07/02/91 FINANCE PUBLICATION
193.05 0.00- 193.05
12.50 0.00 12.50
00007706 08/23/91GRAINGER GRAINGER
?21-115930 08/05/91 10522
Check Totals:
07/23/91 HARDWOOD PIANO BOLLIE
12.50 0.00 12.50
53.13 0.00 53.13
Check Totals:
00007707 08/23/91 GRAY BAR GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
159-206461 07/11/93 10402 07/08/91CRIMPER CONDUCTER & CORD
53,13 0,00 53,13
449,02 0,00 449,02
Check Totals:
00007708 08/23/911NLANDD2 INLAND DISPOSAL, tNC
046850 08/09/91 08/09/93 AUGUST SERVICES
449,02 0,00 449.02
45,00 0,00 45,00
00007709 08/23/91JOK'S
f13550
JON'S FLAG SHOP
08/19/91 10602
Check Totals:
08/12/91 SMALL FLAG POLE;STAND;FLAGS
45.00 0.00 45.00
238.05 0.00 238.05
00007710 08/23/91 LEONARD SANDRA LEONARD
081991 08/19/91
Check Totals:
08/19/91 SWIM LESSON REFUND
238,05 0,00 238,05
5,00 0,00 5,00
00007711 08/23/91 LOCAL
081291
Check Totals:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION
08/12/93 08/20/91 CONPOSTING WORKSHOP j, HREBA
5,00 0,00 5,00
60,00 0,00 80,00
Check Totals:
00007712 08/23/91 LUNCH&ST LUN~rH & STUFF CATERING
081691 08/16/93 08/16/91 LUNCH FOR STAFF DUNE STAFF MT
60.00 0.00 60.00
93.80 0.00 93.80
0(1007713 08/23/91LYO~ LYON COMMUNITIES
081593 08/15/91
Check Totals:
08/05/91 TRACT 22627
93.80 0.00 93.80
525.00 0.00 525.00
Check Totals:
00007734 08/23/91MARiLYNS MARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE
3645 08/12/91 10584 08/04/91 COFFEE SUPPLIES AUG.
525.00 0.00 525.00
83.20 0.00 83.20
Totals: E3.20 0.00 Lj.2(=
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Re,aster
~eck Date Veodor Name
invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
,J07715 08/23/91PE~TYC PET~ CASH
082191 08/21/91 08/21/91 CASH REIMB/CITY 227.87 0.00 227.8?
081991 08/19/91 08/19/91 PETTY CASH/TCSD 142.89 0.00 142.89
Check Totals: 370.76 0.00 370.76
00007716 08/23/91 RAIN RAIN FOR RENT
327836 07/01/91 10573 07/0]/91 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES;PARKS 144.39 0.00 144.39
00007717 08/23/91RIVERSID RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
98284-0 07/31/91 10509 07/09/91
Check Totals: 144.39
ASST DESK PADS, HANGING FOLDE 68.53
0.00 144.39
0.00 68.53
~eck Totals: 68.53 0.00 68.53
00007718 08/23/9I S&SARTS S &S ARTS AND CRAFTS
· 787756-01 07/01/91 10313 06/12/91 DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 38.91 0.00 38.91
8]0345 08/09/91 10532 07/16/91 RECREATION SUPPLIES;TCSD 221.34 0.00 221.34
810147 08/09/91 10533 07/16/91 RECREATION SUPPLIES; TCSD 262.34 0.00 262.34
810143 08/09/91 10531 07/16/91 RECREATION SUPPLIES;TCSD 497.65 0.00 497.65
Check Totals: 1,020.24 0.00 1,020.24
00007719 08/23/91 SECURITY SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BAN
070491-1 07/04/91 07/04/91 4798020000010831S. MUNOZ ' 338.75 0.00 336.75
080491 08/04/91 08/04/91 4798020000010773 D. DIXON 1,311.04 0.00 1,311.04
070491-2 07/04/91 07/04/91 4798-0200-0001-0807 R. PARKS 265.52 0.00 265.52
-- 070491-3 07/04/91 07/04/91 4798020000010799 J. GREEK 127.59 0.00 127.59
080491-1 08/04/91 08/04/91 4798020000010831S. MUNOZ 327.42 0.00 327.42
080491-3 08/04/91 08/04/91 4798020000010815 P BIRDSALL 66.00 0.00 66.00
070493-4 07/04/91 07/04/91 4798020000010815 P BIRDSALL 402.54 0.00 402.54
00007720 08/23/91 SO CAL-i SOUTHERN CA TELEPHONE CO
000727 08/13/91 10487 07/10/91
000727-1 07/13/91 10488 07/10/91
000727-2 08/13/91 10489 07/10/91
000727-3 08/15/91 10494 07/10/91
Check Tota3s: 2~838.86 0.00 2.836.86
INSTALL CELLULAR PHONE-GREEK
INSTALL CELLULAR PHONE-SERLET
INSTALL CELLULAR PHONFHENRY
INSTALL CELLULAR PBONE-THORNH
377.13 0.00 377.13
377.13 0.00 377.33
377.13 0,00 377.13
377.13 0.00 377.13
Check Totals:
00007721 08/23/91 SO CAL-2 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
345-7423-2 08/07/91 08/07/91 JULY SERVICES 714-345-7421
345-7421-1 07/09/91 07/09/91 JUNE ~ARGES 714-345-7421
345-6005-1 07/09/91 07/09/91 JUNE SERVICES 714-345-6005
345-6005-2 08/07/91 08/07/91 JULY SERVICES 714-345-6005
1,508.52 0.00 1,508.52
82.98 0.00 82.98
329.30 0.00 I29.30
303.20 0.00 303.20
366.35 0.00 166.35
00007722 08/23/91 TEN TROP TEMECULA TROPHY
71193 07/26/93 10453
81006 08/02/9] 10454
81005 08/02/91 10457
07/12/91
07/31/91
07/12/91
Check Totals:
CITY LOGO CUSTOM ENGRAVING
DILL/HASTIE MEN TOURN PLAQUES
ALLSTAR PLAQUES
681.83 0.00 681.83
177.78 0.00 177.78
271.31 0.00 271.31
280.15 0.00 280.35
08/23/91TOWNCTR
7663-0
TOWN CEGTER STATIONERS
OS/!6/93 10590 07/30/93
Check Totals:
OFFICE SUPPLIES
729.24 0.00 729.24
25.09 0.00 25.09
Check Totals:
00007724 08/23/93 UNIGLOB~ U~IGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
08209] ~!20/93 0~!20/93 AIR FARE/PAT ~!RDSALL/SA~ FRA
25.09 0.00 25.09
8~.00 0.00
"'= "-"' C~;.=, I:~f 7emecuia ['age: :
F~sca] Year: 1992 ~neck Register Station: 3389
Cneck Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
Check Totals: 88.00 0.00 88.00
00007725 08/23/91WILLIAMS IAY WILLIAMS
081993 08/19/91 08/19/91 MODELING SESSION I 400.00 0.00 400.00
Check Totals: 400.00 0.00 400.00
00007726 09/10/91BEM BKM
3563 05/31/91 90328 03/14/91 CHAIRS FOR NEW CITY HALL 56,461.82 0.00 56,461.82
Check Totals: 56,461.82 0.00 56,461.82
00007727 09/10/91 S&SA~S S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
810148 08/09/91 10534 07/16/91RECREATIOW SUPPLIES; TCSD 176.60 0.00 176.60
00007728 09/10./91TEM TROP TEMECULA TROPHY
· 81007 08/06/91 10456
Check Totals:
07/11/91 BB EEYCBAINS-DILL/HASTIE MEM
176.60 0.00 176.60
307.09 0.00 307.09
Check Tota]s: 307.09 0,00 307.09
Report Totals: 117,142.88 0.00 117,142.88
89/e5/91 City of le:ecula Pa;e:
Fiscal Year: !992 Check Reaister Station:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
lfi7688 88/15/91ROLLAR ROLLAR CITY
B81591 88/15/91 88/14/91 DAY CAMP/TICKETS 9e.H LH 99.H
Check Totals: 98.99
88887683 88/15/91 rLaSGARIT MARSARITA OFFICIALS ASSOC.
HH1 88/86/91 ~233 87/81/91 UMPIRES; 678 ADULT S/B GAMES l,leG.H
file4 87/21/91 9235 97/e1/91 UMPIRES; 678 ADULT S/B GAMES 216.H
file3 87/21/91 9233 97/81/91 UMPIRES; 678 ADULT S/B GAMES 1,144.8B
I8112 87/27/91 823S 87/11/91 UMPIRES; 679 ADULT S/D GAHES 237.68
e.99 99.98
e.e6 1,188.88
e.H 216,H
e.96 1,144.89
e.ee 237.68
Check Totals: 2,786.48
eH87684 H/28191 SIMPLY SIMPLY PERFECT
8761 88128191 98/28/91 MEALS FOR COUNCIL MTG
9.Be 2,7e6.48
e.H 66.ee
.... Check Totals:
· HH7686 H/25191COUNTYRC COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CLERK &
e82391 eB/21/91 eB/23/91 ASSESSMENT FEE
66,8e B,e9 66.H
25,H e.88 25,98
H997729 88126/91 3C~A 5CMA
H229I 88/22/91
Check Totals:
H/22/91 3CMA CONFIKARL LINDERMAN
25,99 e.e9 25,H
e8687736 88/26/91VILLAHTL VILLA HOTEL
982691 H126t91
Check Totals:
H/22/91 LEAD, CA. CITY/PAT BIRDSEL
Check Totals:
88867731 H/26/91LAMANSIO LA MANSIO DEL RIO HOTEL _
982691 98/26/91 68/26/91 CMA CONFERENCE/KAREL LINDEMAN
74.52 9,H 74.52
74.52 Leg 74,52
584.32 e.H 584.32
ee867732 H/27/91 DIXON DAVID F, DIXON
882791 H/27i91
, Check Totals:
88/27/91 EXPENSE REIMB, a.D. POWER
384.52 9,H 584,52
186.74 e,H 1H.74
eeH7733 88/27/91 DIXON DAVID F, DIXON
982791-1 G8/27/91
Check Totals:
88/27191 EXPENSE REIND./LEA6. CA, CTY
Check Totals:
HH7734 88/27/91PARKCAFE PARK CAFE & CATERING
1678 68/27/91 e8/27/91 DINNER FOR COUNCIL
186.74 e. Be 188.74
198.14 9.Be 198.14
198.14 e.88 198.14
72.89 9.H 72.88
98687735 88/27/91 MOOREPEG PEG MOORE
882791 88/27/91
Check Totals:
88/27/91 EXPENSE REIM8./LCC MONTEREY
72.89 6.H 72.88
684.H 9,88 684.H
Check Totals:
96887736 98/27/91 BIRDSALL PATRICIA BIRDSALL
H2791 88/27/91 88/27/91 EXPENSE REIMB/LCC MDNTERREY
684.88 e.16 684.98
474.84 e.ee 474.84
187737 88/27/91CALMUNI
882791
Check Totals:
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS
88/27i91 88/27/91LUNCHEON/ZEE SMITH
474,84 9.88 474,94
2e.H 8,88 28,88
Check Total!:
8H87738 88/27/91 FRANKLIN FRANKLIN SEHINARS
882791 ~8/27/91 18681 BB/2D/~! SEHINA~ AUG ~
28.88 8.66 28,88
1,,.7o 8,88 145.78
89/83/9!
Fiscal Year: 1972
City of Te~ecuia
Check Register
Page:
Station:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description
Discount
Net
Check Totals:
BH87739 98/27/91GOVTFINO GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A
882791 88/27/91 88/27/91 SUBMIT BUDGET DOC./BFOA
145.78
288.89
8,18
145.7~
Check Totals:
88887741 88/27/91TEMMUBEU TEMECULA MUSEUM FOUNDATION
881591 H/15/91 88/15/91 LOAN
22,281.98
e.19
8.18
288.16
22,288.88
98887748 89/8~/91 ALLCITY
1113
1164
1115
Check Totals:
ALL CITY MANAGEMENT
97181/91 8231 i7/91/91 JUNE CHARGES; TRAFFIC CONTROL
87/81/91 8231 97/91/91 JUNE CHAR6ES; TRAFFIC CONTROL
87/91/91 8231 87/91/91 JUNE CHARBESt TRAFFIC CONTROL
22,298.89
286.13
21832
235.76
8,81
i,ll
22,2H.~
286.13
218,92
235.76
99897749 89/83/91 ALLIED
116736-H
116735-~8
ALLIED BARRICADE
88/21/91 11623
88/21/91 18579
Check Totals:
88/14/91 ST. MAINT SUP/B/21/91
88/96/91HAROWARE SUPPLIES/8/21
748.81
165.~7
248.82
e,te
I,II
8,el
741.81
165.37
246,82
88887758 99/83/91ARTESIA
W018977
IV42817
23475
Check Totals:
ARTESIA INhERiT
97/82/91 1965~ 97/81/91HOWER RENTAL;.52 HOURS
17181/91 18652 - 97/81/91 FILTERS;ELEmENTS
97/81/91 18782 87/81/91 HOMER RENTAL;TWO DAYB; TCSD
88987751 99/8~/91 BARAN L.E. BARAN
682191 88/29/91
Check Totals:
98/21/91 REFUND/CATALINA CANaLLED
486.19
25,48
159.65
223.65
488.78
158,89
1,91
6.99
9,18
I,GI
8.16
466.19
25.48
159.65
223.65
498.7E
158.88
, Check Totals:
88897752 69/83/91CALIFCON CALIFORNIA CONTRCT CITIES ASS
882291 88/22/91 68/22/91REB. SENINAR/KARL LINDE~ANS
158.88
158.88
8.89
158.98
158.88
89887753 69183191CALNUNI
882191
Check Totals:
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS
88/21/V1 88/21/91QUAR.MEETINB/ALLAN MARSHALL
88887754 89/83/91CALWEST CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
868142A 87/83/91 18679 87/11191
669894A 67/24/91 II679 87/81/91
969183A 87/26/91 19679 07/61191
967914A 87/83/91 18679 97/81/91
868185A 67/92/91 18679 87/81/91
Check Totals:
RENTAL;PIANO DOLLY;VACUUM
RENTAL;PIANO DOLLY;VACUUM
RENTAL;PIANO DOLLY)VACUUM
REliTAL)PIANO DOLLY;VACUUM
RENTAL;PIANO DOLLY;VACUUM
156.88
29.89
28.86
6.39
6.47
8.88
49.52
27.16
8.98
8.88
8.98
8,88
8.i6
9.98
6.80
8.98
158.88
28.88
28.88
6.39
6.47
8.88
49,52
27.16
98867755 89/83/91 CHESHIRE CHESHIRE EMBROIDERY
882391 H/23/91 18595 87/82/91
Check Totals:
SHERIFF UNIFORM PATCH;CTYSEAL
97.62
1,643.19
9.98
8.89
97.62
!,643.19
86897756 99/85/91 CUMMINS MILDRED CUMMINS
882991 88/19/91 68/19/91
882891 88/28/91 88/28/91
Check Totals:
REFUND/CATALINA CANCELLED
REFUND/ROSE PARADE
1,643.!9
158.88
158.88
8.89
8.88
8.88
1,643.19 _
158.88
158,88
89887757 89/8~/91DANAPTR DANA POINT RESORT
Check Totals:
3)8.88
B.98
388.88
Fiscal ~eaf: I992
Check Register
Station:
Check
Date Vendor
Invoice Date
Name
P/O
Date Description
Gross
Discount
Net
882291 fi/22191
68/22/91CALIF CONTRACT SENIOR/KARL
242.66
242.68
Check Totals:
66867758 99193191EASTBRTH EAST BROTHERS GROVE SERVICE,
53549 67/63/91 19689 17/61/91 NEED EXTRACTION;SADDLENOOD
99997759 99/63/91 GETPAGED BET PAGED
9894438-IN 98/16191 9219
68~4438-1 98/29/91 9228
9893421-IM 97/61/91 6228
Hg39fi-IN 67/19/91 9228-
68941~4-IN 97/26/91 1219
98t4114-IM 97/19/91 9219
99997769 69163191 BENILL GTE
A676-1932 97/97/91
8676-69~2 98/97/91
881691 98/16/91
98/16/91 98/16/91
971691 97/16/91
A981691 68116/91
A671691 97/16/91
8681691 68/16/91
8971691 67/16/91
686191 98/91/91
Check Totals:
67/15/91 ~ONTHLY SERV. PABERS/AUB, SER
97161191 MONTHLY PA6ER/AUS. SERV
17/ll/91PABERS/JUNE
-97/61/91-PAGERS/JULY
97/15/91PAGERS/JULY
97/15/91PABERS/JULY
Check Totais:
17/67/91 714-676-1932 -JUNE CHBS
98/17/91 714-676--1932 JULY CHGS
98/16/91 714-162-5596 JULY CLOSE BILL
98/16/91 714-672-5595- JULY CHGS
97116/91 714-162-5595 JUNE CHBS
98/16/91 714-i62-6652 JULY SERV
97/I&/91 714-162-6152 JUNE SERV
6811&/91 714-162-6143/JULY SERV
97/16/91 714-162-6943 JUNE SERV
68191/91 714-197-~854 JULY SERV.
242.66
3,668.68
48.56
162.fi
1S5.66
1~5.H
29,79
55.35
557.55
54.78
1~.52
~42.29
224.21
1,767.37
1J95.52
1,767.74
5,929.64
9.66
8.99
6.96
1.98
9.H
6.69
9.19
6.68
6 .H
6.89
9.69
242.68
3,HO.H
3,699.9
46.56
162.99
135.69
29.71
55,35
557.55
-31,6.1
54.78
13.52
~42.29
224,21
1,767.37
1,395.52
1,767.74
1,399.26
5,629.64
99997761 99193191HAFELIll'I THOMAS HAFELI
982691 68/2&/91
99697763 8918~191HANKSHAR
HANKS HARDWARE
96766
96664
96678
96687
96335
96329
96425
93599
95922
94458
94466
91833
~314
94911
91931
91754
93769
96975
97854
98/21/91 19655
68/21/91 16655
68121191 16655
HI21191 16655
68/21R1 19655
98121191 19655
98/21/91 19655
98/21/91 19655
H/21/91 19655
H/21/91 19655
98/21/91 19655
H/21/91 18655
68121/91 18455
98/21/91 19655
68/21/91 18455
68/21/91 16655
68/21/91 16655
68/21/91 18655
68/21/91 18655
68/26/91
Check Totals:
REIM9/NEC AMERICA COURSE
Check Totals:
HI21191 coupler
98121191 COUPLER/TEE
98/21/91MISC.REPAIR EQUIPNENT;TCSD
68/21/91MISC.REPAIR EOUIPNENT;TCSD
68/21/91NISC.REPAIR EQUIPMENT;TCSD
98121191MISC.REPAIR EQUIPMENT;TCSD
H/21/91MISC.REPAIR EDUIPMENT;TCSD
98/21/91 MEASURING TAPE
98/21/~1MISC,REPAIR E9UIPMENT;TCSD
68/21/91 BATTERY/RISER
98121191 KEY/BUCKET
H/21/91 FITTINGS
98/21/91 KEYS
68/21/91MISC.REPAIR EGUIPMENT;TCSD
68/21/91 TAPE/COUPLER
88/21/91 GLUE/HAMMER
68/21/91MISC.REPAIR EOUIPMENT~TCSD
68/21/91 NISC.REPAIR EOUIPNENT;TCSD
68/21/91 CHAIN
11,875.B1
2,138.BB
2,138.88
9.91
2.96
29.34
29.43
16,19
27.86
41.~9
58.56
15.96
22,49
15,71
1.7~
3.46
8.54
7.49
29.43
46.56
19.91
9.87
6
9.99
9 .H
6.96
9.96
9.96
6.69
6.96
9.66
9.96
9,96
6.e6
9.98
6.99
9.69
6.6e
!1,875.81
2,138.88
2,138.88
6.91
2.96
28.34
29.43
16.19
27.86
41.36
58.56
15.96
22.49
15.71
1.79
3.49
8.56
7.49
26.4~
46.59
19.91
9.87
99967764 99/83/91HARGIS
682691
RUSSELL HAR6IS
88/26/91
68128191
Check Totals:
REFUND/CATALINA CANCELLED
353.76
158,69
~53.76
I58,6~
Fiscal Year: 1992 CnecF ;.eci:.ter Station:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
Check Totals: I58.88 8.99 158.88
6H67765 99/65171HARKEREV EVELYN HARICER
662391 66/23/91 66/23/9! REIMB/AIRFARE 13G.66 6.61 136.H
Check Totals:
866e7766 69/63/91 HIGHGRAD HIGHGRADE 8GINEERING
91147 87/61/91 16685 87/!1191 LOAD & HAUL BROKEN CONCRETE
139.66 6.66 136.86
486.98 6.66 486.96
99667767 19/65191HORNSVEL PATTY HORNSVELD
681391 98/13/91
Check Totals:
88/15/tl REFUND/CLASS CANCELLED
486.89 6.69 488.99
72.86 i.8i 72.H
Check Totals:
66H7768 6t/63/91 KING IKt KING ONE K-9 ACADEMY
682391 96/25/91 66/23/91 DO6 OBEDIENCE/SESSION I
Check Totals:
H96776~ 6V/63/tl ~IDLAWT LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
326467 66/22/91 66/22/91 TRANS. TO ~OTIS BERRY FARN
72.69 6.86 72.69
526.96 i.H 528.66
528.86 6.86 529,66
385.37 8,66 385.37
Check Totals:
9H67776 6~/63/61LEABUE-I LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
16426 ~7/91/V1 16227 94/26/91 ADM & LEGAL B~KS
385.57 I.H 385,57
26.63 6,99 26.65
Check Totals:
68667771 69/63/91 LEECHART NANCY LEE CHARTER & TOURS
662691 68/26/91 68/26/tl TRANS TO PAUL BETTY MUSEUM
69997772 69/63/91M.C,R.LA M.C.R, LANDSCAPE
2522 67/81/91 18377
2522CR 68/28/~1
Check Totals:
66/17/91 WEED REMOVAL/JUNE
68/28/91 CREDIT NENO/EXC. P.O.
Check Totals:
88987773 69/63/91NARGARIT NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSOC.
69667 18/15/91 6233 67/91/91 UMPIRES/AUGUST
flee6 68115191 6235 e7/61/91 UMPIRE/AUG
Check Totals:
89687774 89163/91 ~ARILYNS HARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE
1635 68/16/91 18631 68116191 COFFEE SUPPLIES AUGUST SER.
1661 68/19/91 16651 68/16/91 COFFEE SUPPLIES/AUGUST
26,63 6,96 26.65
476,H 6,66 476.69
476.69 6,86 476,69
585.93 8.69 585.93
29,94- 9,96 29.94-
555.99 6,86 555.~9
172,69 i,H 172,66
777.66 8.69 777.66
956.49 9.19 956.49
92.56 6,69 92.56
69.66 6.66 69.69
Check Totals:
HH7775 69/63/91NARTINEZ DEANN IDYK-MARTINEZ
666291 88/62/91 66/62/91REFUND/SNIN LEMONS
161,56 6.69 !61.56
29.89 6.86 26.69
9691777~ 99163/91 NEWPORT
68623
68628
66612
Check Totals:
NEWPORT WAVE SOFTWARE
D7/22/91 9183 ~4/26t91COMP. TECH 7/15/91
B7/24/91 ~185 64/26/91 JOHN HINES 7/22/91
07/16/~1 ~163 94/26/91 JOSEPH TIERNAN 7/11
26,86 9.69 29,69
136.66 6.69 136.66
375,69 ~.61 575.80
113.75 6.69 113.75
H667777 89/~5/ti ORANGES
822753
Check Totals:
ORANGE SPORTING GOODS
68/39/91 ~8296 ~1/31/91 48 DOZEN SOFTBALLS
618.75 !,e6 618.75
245,35 e. BB 245.35
Fiscal Year: !972
Chec~ Register
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Descri;tion
Gross
Discount
Net
96687778 89103191PAC[FICW PACIFIC WEST
862~1 67161191 16665
Check Totals:
67/61/91 RENT;BOBCAT TREN~ER;ROTO TIL
245.55
128.88
8
9.66
245.55
126.88
Check Totals:
66667779 89/63/91PACIFIRR PACIFIC IRRIGATION
5~2761 97/62/91 1~64 67/62/91 IRRIGATION ~TERIALS;TCSD
3~625 67/17/91 16663 67/16/91 BATTERY CONTROLLERJ TCSD
129.86
254.85
9.96
9.66
9.69
126.86
254.83
99697788 69/65/91 QUALITY
6561
Check Totals:
QUALITY TONER SUPPLY
68/16/91 19587 67/24/91 RECHARGE TONER CARTRIDGES
644.76
245.86
6.66
6.66
644.76
245,88
Check Totals:
99697781 99163191R.B.EXPR R.B.EXPRESS NESSFJi6ER SERVICE
5849 87/31/91 8225 67/91/91 PICK~/DFJ, V. DEP.JULY SERV.
245.88
275.86
8.66
245,66
275,98
66667782 99/63/91 RANBEY
5485
Check Totals:
RAHSEY BACKFq, OW & PLUHBING
67/16/91 16687 67/15/91 BACKFLOW DEVICES;PARTS&LABOR
275.99
95.88
6.66
275.69
95,69
Check Totals:
HH7785 99/95191RIVCTYCH RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHAPTER
682191 68/21/91 68121191NE~BERSHIP/ANTHONY ELMO
Check Totals:
d667784 69/63/91SHERAT-I SHERATON - SPOKANE HOTEL
681591 88/15/91 98/15/91 EDUC & CODE DEV. CON~,,/ELMO
95.68
59.66
56.68
511.44
6'.66
8.66
95.88
56.66
56.69
511.44
68667785 69/83/91SIGNKWIK SIGN KWIK
813297 98/16/91 19486
Check Totals:
87/16/91 DOOR SIGN/DOOR A & DOOR B
511.44
58.59
8.66
511.44
58.59
Check Totals:
86667786 89/83191SO-CAL-2 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
$49-3439-2 68/67/91 68/97/91 714-349-$439
$45-7425-2 88/67/91 98/87/91 714-345-7425
345-7425-1 97/99/91 97169191 714-345-7425
34577419-2 68/67/91 68/67/91 714-345-7419
JULY SERVICES
JULY
JUNE SERV.
JULY SERVICES
69687789 89/83/91SOUTHCED
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
A8-766797 67191191 67/61/91
A8-733519 67/61/91 97/61/91
A398-51768 07/17/91 67/17/91
A388476569 67/16/91 67116191
A368393819 67/16/91 87/16/91
A85689458 67/12/91 67/12/91
A588426227 87/12/91 67/12/91
A531H~17 97/16/91 87/16/91
A85674588 97/26/91 87/26/91
A8814825 97/36/91 97/36/91
85-882944 97/91/91 97/91/91
A369826279 97/95/91 97/85/91
B$6992927~ 98/82/91 98/92/91
aN17812628 88/92/91 68/92/91
Check Totals:
66774111695828667 5/13-6/12
6677411925562H65 5/13-6/12
66774118911629696 6/12-7/11
5977885162136991 6/I1-7/I1
5977892542293HH 6/11-7/11
57777862489636967 6/7-7/9
57777888746636699 617-7/9
59777994685936686 6/11-7/11
67778639414628662 6/28-7/23
G9776781651629692 6/25-7/24
66777958462636699 ~/22-4/11
51779656161926663 5/39-6/29
51779658191629683 6/29-7/$6
51779651892919984 6/29-7/39
96,22
53.25
66,97
48.81
259.25
9.69
11.82
8.76
9.68
9.69
9,66
9,66
9.8~
278.17
243.$S
48.75
56.74
59.29
53.84
6.69
9.66
6.69
6.66
8.66
6.69
9.68
6.66
9.96
9.89
9.9B
9.68
58.39
96.22
53.25
69.97
48.81
259,25
11.62
8.78
9.68
9.96
9.48
9.66
9.83
278.17
243.53
48,75
56.74
59.29
55.94
Fiscal Tear: [992 Check Register Station:
Chec[
Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date
Description
Gross
Discount
Net
A85759853 87112191 87112191
88685178 88162191 88182191
A2884H529 87112191 87112191
A788823136 8711219[ 87112191
A8766797 87/17/91 87/87RI
A873~519 87117/91 87117191
8531fi917 H/14/91 H/14/91
8388426227 68112191 88112191
885689458 68/12/91 H/12/91
838839~819 88/14/91 68/14/91
8388476369 88114191 98114191
83113466- 88114191 68114191
KIHS17688 88115191 68115191
87888231,% 88112191 88112191
8288464529 88/12RI 68/12/91
8368465421 88188191 H/98/91
8~88517678 68197/91 HI67191
8388517677 88187191 68/87/91
829836H25 88/87/91 H/97/91
AN18581846 87/25191 87125/91
A85H2944 87/25/91 97/25/91
885759853 88/12/91 88/12/91
8283H5~24 H123/91 68/23/91
8298432191 88123191 68123191
85882944 87/81/91 67/91/91
85882944-I 87181191 87/91191
AY71791898 87/25/91 97/25/91
AY71761699 87/25/91 87/25/91
717818982 68/23/91 88/23/91
717618993 88/26/91 88/23/91
66867798 89183191STRACHOT STRACHOTA INSURANCE
86686 88168191 88188191
57775&6197381H64 6/7-7/9
5177985tHZ82~H5 6/29-7138
5777~567818~882 6/>719
57"'/7566~24929H5 6/7-7/9
6877411189592~97 6/12-7/11
69774119255r21fi5 6112-7111
59777994985136996 7/11-8/9
5777788874H,Ii69 7/9-8/7
57777882489836997 7/9-8/7
59778125422HI983 7/11-8/9
5977885192115fi61
597789254141~18H 7111-819
~177411H1112Hfi 7/11-8/16
577756LT324128H5 7/9-8/7
5777565679182~82 719-816
55771267543MI986 715-815
5477828651582HH 7/3-8/2
54778~658~82~82 7/3-8/2
54778286484826982 7/3-8/2
6a77795868H4H66 5/26-7/22
66777958442LI619 6/26--7/22
5777566197361HH7/9-8/7
~777959~13829H3 7/22-8/19
66774951849928988 7/22-8/19
667779584621,1HI9 5/2F6/28
6677795846213H99 4111-5/28
6677585883~4197 6/2F7/22
66775858856Hfi99 6/2F7/22
66775858638941559 CL05t 8ILL
66775858836841551 CLOSE
Check Totals:
LOCATION ENDORSERENT
31.27
258,99
9.68
39,25
8,76
18,88
9.53
8.78
8,78
8,76
9,77
9,H
39,25
8.46
9.88
9.88
14.82
28,56
49,~
31,58
2H.57
59.41
49,18
538.52
284,78
1H,48
58.19
2,967.31
16.88
6.68
6
9.88
8.86
6.99
8.19
8.98
9.88
8.89
8.66
i.98
8.88
6.99
6.89
8
6.86
8,88
6.88
8,il
6.88
8,88
6.88
8
6.68
6,88
8.68
8.88
51.27
258.99
9.66
39.25
8.78
19.86
8.76
8.78
8,78
8.78
9.77
9.88
39.25
8.48
9.89
14.82
26.56
238,44
295.57
59.41
49.18
538.52
284,78
188.48
58,19
2,967.31
16,66
86887791 89163191TENCULAT TENECULA TOWNE ASSOC
653191CR 87/81/91 87161191
679591 87/65/91 8227 87181191
872491 87/24/91 8227 87/81/91
962191 67181191 9227 87/81/91
872591 87/25/91 8227 87/!1/91
Check Totals:
~EDIT ~E~/DOUBLE PAYNENT
HALL RENT JULY/CLEANING JUNE
HALL RENT ~/CLEANUP OULY
HALL RENT ~ULY
HALL RENT A~UST
16,88
637.60.-
262.58
592,58
158,19
9.88
6.66
8,89
8.98
8.88
16,88
637.68-
262.56
592.59
158.88
68667792 69163191 TENECREN TEMECULA RENTS
36827 87126191 18519 67126191
38488 67/29191 16519 67/26/91
29714 87126191 18519 67/26/91
29574 67/26/91 185i9 87/26/91
29919 6712619I 18519 67/2~/91
29888 87/26/91 18519 67/26/91
29729 67126/91 16519 87/26/91
Check Totals:
RENTAL TRENC~R/7/$
RENTAL/AUGER 7~29
RENTAL/BOLT CUTTER 6/17
WEED ~OMER RENTAL/6/12
RENTAL/TRENCHER 6/28
RENTAL/TRENCHER 6/27
RENTAL TREN~ER/6/18
668.86
68.88
8.89
12i.68
148.68
I46.88
52,88
8,88
8,88
6.89
8.68
6.88
6,66
668.99
68.88
8.66
121.88
148.88
148.88
52.88
H687793 8918319[ TOWNCTR
7885-6
TOWN CENTER STATIONERS
88/22/91 18687 68/H/91
Check Totals:
5 HOLE PUNCH
562.89
56.74
8.88
8.68
562.86
56.74
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check ReGis:=r Stirion: ~56o.
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Sross Discount Net
Check Totals: 56.74 8.88 56,74
,J794 89/85/91TRUBEE LISA MARIE TRUBEE
888591 88/85/91 88/85/91REFUND/DAYCAMP 315.81 8,H 515.68
Check Totals: 515.88
88667795 89/85/91UNIGLOBE UNIBLOBE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
761717618 88/38t91 68/36/91LI~ERMANS/S~ANTONID 5CMA CO 576.88
8.88 515.68
6.68 576.88
Check Totals: 576.86
86667796 89/85/91 VALLEY VALLEY OFFICE PRODUCTS
11525 88/28191 18568 87/26191 OFFICE SUPPLIES; TCSO 63.43
8.66 57&.88
88887797 89/83/91WHII~EHEA PARIS WHITEHEAD
886591 88/15/91
Check Totals:
68/65/91REFUNDISWI~ LESSONS
Check Totals:
88687798 69/85/91 WINDSOR1 WINDSOR PARTNERS-RANCHO IM8
688191 ~8/81191 82~5 87/81/91 RENT STORABE/JULY & AUG
68/81/91 88181191 8235 i7/61191 BUILD RE)T/SEPT
65.43 8.88
28.H 8.66 28.66
28.81 8,88 28,88
468.86 6.86 4H.88
2H.81 8.H 26i. H
86887868 89/18/91 ALLCITY
1114
Check Totals:
ALL CITY NANAGENENT
17/62/91 8231 67/61/91 JUNE CHARBES; TPj~FFIC CONTROL
4,471.12
666.86
4,471.82
Check Totals:
87881 89118191JRFREENA J. R. FREEMAN CO., INC
4HJB 87/88/91 18558 86/IB/91 IBM WHEELWRITER 15
41121 88/13/91 18559 87/11/91 IBM TYPEWRITER; BLDB &~AFETY
4,471.62
5s2,56
524.74
6.88 4,471.82
8,88 532,58
8,68 524,74
Check Totals:
86887882 89/18/91 ROBERTBE ROBERT BEIN, NM. FROST & A.SSO
>7846 88/16/91 8218 67/61/91 CIVIL ENB./JULY SERV,
1-68(2 87122/91 B186 84/38/91 CONST. SCHED. JUNE SERV.
1-7641 88/16/91 8186 84/56/91CONSTR~ SCHED./JULY SERVICES
1,857.24
6~842.68
2,531.68
1J9~.68
1,657.24
8.88 6,842.68
8,88 2,5~1.68
6,66 1,293.68
Check Totals:
86887863 89/18/91SCHUHACH SCHUMACHER AUTO SALE & LEASIN
1163 88119/91 18297 86185191TSCD VEHICLES
1163CR 88/28/91 H/28/91 CREDIT ~Q/EXCEEDED PO
18,667.88
15,565.61
179.BF
8.68 18,~67,88
8,88 15,563.91
6,68 179.84-
88887884 89/18/91 SETCON SETCON CORP.
326qB 88/16/91 18878 8~/22/91
Check Totals:
CABLE KIT;HELMET;SPEAKER KIT
15,525.17
1,158.64
8.88 15,523.17
8.86 1,159.84
Check Totals:
H887885 89/18191 SIRSPEED SIR SPEEDY
4633 87/24/91 18495 87/12/91 4 PART CASH RECEIPTS
4125 8715119l 16491 87115191 BIN STATIONARY
4898 87/31/91 18491 87/15/91B/W STATIONARY
3822 87/81191 18698 87/81/91 CASH RECEIPTS
1,156.84
419.79
1,949.57
1J76.84
251j7
1,158.84
8.88 419.79
8.86 1,948.37
8.86 1.276.84
6.86 251.37
08887886 89/18/91 T~ TROP TE)ECULA TROPHY
81289 88125/91 18551
81287 88/25/91 18551
81286 88/25/91 18551
Check Totals:
87/19/91 SOFTBALL TROPHIESI
87/I9/91 SOFTBALL TROPHIES;
87/19/91SOFIBALL TROPHIES:
3,888.37
8.H 3,888.37
459.81 8.88 459.81
474.19 8.88 474,18
584,27 8.89 584.27
8~/83I~1 City of ieaecuis Page:
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Reoister Station:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date
Description
Gross
Discount
Net
81288 88/25/91 18551 87/19/91
81285 88125/91 18551 67119/91
98687887 99/18R1T~S TH01'IAS TBPORARIES
578675 H/I1RI 18548 67/24RI
575272 87/14R1 19528 87/87/91
575272-1 87/14/91 18516 87118R1
575272-2 87/14R1 18515 97/81/91
573272-5 97114/91 18527 87/82/91
572684 67/67R11~515 87/61/91
572884-1 87/67/91 18527 87/12/~1
578174 88/11R1 16528 67/67/91
574447 67t21/91 16528 67/67/91
574447-1 87/21/fi 18515 67/81/91
98887888 89118191TO-NACEN TO-HAC EN6INEERING
I2H& 68/17/~I 68/17/91
SOFTBALL TROPHIES;
SOFTBALL TROPHIES;
Check Totals:
TE~P. SEC. WE 8/4/91
TENP. SERV.WE 7/14R1
ASSIST FILINB WE 7/14
T~P WE 7/14/91
TE~P WE 7/14/91
TE~P/WE 7/7
TE~P/WE 7/7
TE~P SERV/WE B/11
TEI, tP SERV/WE 7/21
TE)iP HEI.P/WE 7/21
Check Totals:
PROF. SERV. JULY
Check Totals:
Report Totals:
474.19
584.27
2,415.75
92.88
554.48
128.51
597.92
419.52
265,28
596.H
76.24
5,616.48
2,789.19
2,769.18
· 168,859.71
9.88
6.66
474.1~
584.27
2,415,75
92.86
554.48
128.56
568.,~
597.92
419.52
2&5.28
5~8.18
7&.24
5,616.48
2,789.19
2,789.18
188,839.71
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date F'/O Date Descrimtion 8ross Discount Net
768 5 8/23/91COUNTYHD CO.OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH DEPT.
JAN 71 81131/91 ~1/51/9! ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.JAN 91 4.726.8~ 8.88 4226.88
JULY 9~ 81/31/?I 81/3!/9I ENVIRONMENT HEALTH, JULY 90 1,~i8.88 0.88 1.848.88
OCT ~ 81/31/91 ~!/51/91 ENVIRO~NENT HEALTH jUL 98 5,531.~8 B.B8 5,531.80
DEC 98 81/3!/91 81/31/~1 ENVIRONMENT HEALTH DEC 98 581.88 0.88 581.88
NOV 98 01/51/9! 81/31/91 ENVIRONMENT HEALTH NOV 98 2.429.88 8.88 2,429.88
SEPT 98 81/5I/~I 81/31/91 ENVIRONMENT HEALTH SEPT 98 ~,822.88 B.8B 6.822.80
AUG 91 81/31/91 81/51/91ENVT HEALTH CDRRCT BL JULY 91 2,788.~8 8.80 2,780.~
MARCH ?1 B4/eli?l 84/~1/91 ENVIRON.HEALTH;MARCH BILLING 8,771.88 8.88 8,771.88
Check Totals:
08887684 88/23/91COUNTYHD CO.OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH DEPT.
'~,528.88
~. 8.88 52,528.~8
FEB 91 82/81/91 82/81/91 ANIMAL CONTROL FOR FEB 91 5.759.74 B.88 5,759.74
JAN 91 AN 81/31/91 81/31/91 ANIMAL CONTROL FOR JAN 91 7,825.26 ~,88 7.825.26
DEC 98 AN ~1/51/91 ~1/31/91 ANIMAL CONTROL FOR DEC 98 5.939.14 8.88 5,939.14
NOV ~ AN 81/31/~I ~1/31/9! CORRECT ANIMAL CONTROL NOV 90 6,577.76 B.B8 ~,577.76
OCT 9~ AN ~1/51/91 ~1/31/91 ANIMAL CONTROL FOR OCT 90 788.~B B.88 70~.08
SEPT 98 AN 81/51/91 81/31/91 ANIMAL CONTROL FOR S~T 98 ~25.88 8.88 925.88
AUG 90 AN 81/51/91 81/31/91ANIRAL CONTROL FOR AUG 98 888.88 188 888.~8
JUL 98 AN 81131/91 81131191 ANIMAL CONTROL FOR jULY 98 895.88 8.88 895.88
MARCH 91' 84/81/~1 98-829 98/~3/98 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES;MARCH 6,832.2~ B.88 6.832.28
APRIL 84/81191 98-829 88/83/98 ANIMAL CONTROL; APRIL 91 6,969.76 8.88 ~.969.76
7683
88/25/91 COUNTYTR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
68-3188 81/31/91 81/51/91
68-318~A ~I/51/91 81/31/91
68-31~B 81/31/91 81/31/91
68-Z188.18 81151191 eI131/91
68-31~8.2~ 81/31/91 81/31/91
68-3181 81/31/91 fii/51/91
88-3181A 81/31/9! ~!/31/91
68-31~18 011~I191 81131191
68-3181C 81/31/91 81/31/91
68-3181D BI131/~1 BIIZ!/?I
68-31~1.18 81/31/91 81/31/91
~8-3181.19 81/31/9! BllZl/~l
68-3181.21 81/31/91 81/31/91
68-3183.19 81/31/91 81/31/91
&8-3!83 8UZlISI ~1131191
68-31848 81/31/91 81/51/91
68-3184 81131191 8!131191
68-3184.!8 9!/31/91 ~1/31/91
68-3184A BI131/91 81131191
~8-3184.!9 ~1/31/91 81/31/91
68-1288.!9 ~1131191 8U31191
68-3281 81/31/91 81/51/91
88-3282 81/31/7! 81/~I/9!
&8-3283 81/31/91 01/31/91
~8-~511 81/51/~! el/3!/91
~8-~548 8!/5!/?I 81/~!/91
58-3548A ~I/31/91 81/31/9!
~-5~4!.iS 81/~I/~! ~!/~I/~1
Check Totals: 42.583.88 B,88 42.583.86
ENG SER JUL 98
ENG SERV NOV 98
ENB SER OCT 18-31, 1991
ENG SERV FILING&OFF REC AUG98
ENB SER A~MIN SEPT 6-19, 9~
MAIN CONSTR SUPER JAN
MAINT&CONST SUPER JUL 12-25,8
MAINT CONST SUPER OCT 4-31,98
NAINT CONST SUPER NOV 1-14,98
MAINT CONST SPER NOV29DEC12,8
NAINT CDNST SPER AUG 9-22,90
NAINT CONST SUP AUG23SEPS,9~
MAINT CONST SUPER SEP28OCT5,8
STENCIL MARK PAVENT AUG~-22,8
STENCIL MARK PAVT AUB23-SEP~
STENCIL NARK P~ENT JUL!2-AUGB
STRIP ST JUL 1-!I, 9B
STRIP ST JAN I8-23, 90
STRIP ST AUG 9-22, 98
STRIP ST NOV 29- DEC 2&,
STRIP ST AUG 25 SEPT 5,98
CALLE ~EOUSA STOP SIGN AUG
NA~E SIGN CORTE/AVENIDA OCTSe
VARIOUS SIGN INSTALL NOV 98
W[NCH&NICOLAS CONST JAN-FEBgl
PLACE SiGN 3RD ST AUGS-22,98
SIGNS TE~ AVE DEL PEP JUL
CLEAN DITCH NOV !-!4, 98
EQUIP LITTER CLEANUP DEC-JAN
TRAFF SIGNS REPAIR DEC !3-26
RIGHT OF WAY ~AINT AUG 9-22.~
E~S ~E~ SEPT 29- OCT ~3.99
574.58 8.88 574.38
.~74.72 8.88 574,72
188.&1 8.80 188.&1
Ila.41 ~,e~) llA.41
122.77 0.80 122.77
I44.64 ~.08 ~44.64
782.94 ~.~8 782.94
385.38 ~.88 385.38
95.90 8.80 95.98
11~,41 0,~8
321.94 ~.88 32134
365.18 0.80 3&5.18
non 15 B,8e 282.&5
.... 8.88 24.Z5
184.98 8.88 184.98
2,861.84 8.88 L861.84
3&.74 8.88 36.74
~89.78 8,88 &89.78
i ,878.88 8.88 1,878.88
122.23 a. 8~ 122.2Z
258.47 8.88 258,47
8a. 1~ 8.88 8&. l&
157.~8 8.88 157.88
1,88~. ~8 8.88 [. ~83.38
494.95 8.88 494.95
589.79 6.8~ 58~. 78
782.76 8.88 782.76
164.~5 ~.~8 Za4
12~.85 8.88 12~.~5
.... ~ ~.~9 143.55
=: =~ ~.~ =~ =-
Check Date VenOor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
6G-354B.21 B1/51/91 81/31191ENG SERV SEPT 28-0CT 5, 98 192.19 ~.eO 172.17
68-$543 01/31/91 8[131/71 EQUIP DEC 27,98-FEB 6, 91 285.76 0.88 285.76
&8-3549 81/31/91 81131191TRAFF SIGN REPAIR JUL !-11,9B
&8-35494 81/31/91 81/51/91TRAFF SIGNS REPLACE OCT4-17,e 115.98 8.88 1!5.98
68-3549B 81/31/91 el/51/91 PATCH TEM-FRONT ST NOV 98
68-3549C 81/31/91 81131191BARRICAD TER-FRONT DEC27jAN9 95.98 0.8B 95.98
68-3550.21 Bl131/91 Bl/31/91 TRAFF REPAIR&REPLACE SE2BOC3 12B.56 s.ee 128.56
68-3558 01/31/91 01/3119! GRADE SHOULD NOV 1-14, 9~ 185.44 B.BB 185.44
68-3551 81/31/91 81/51/91 DRAIN CLEAN TEM-FRONT JUL-AgB 429.57 ~.e8 429.57
68-3551.21B1131/91 81131191 TRAFF SIGNS RE-PAIR/PLACE SEP 212.25 B.BB 2!2.25
68-3551C Bii31/91 81/31/91 PATCH TEH-FRONT NOV 15-2B,gB 129.23 8.88 129.23
68-35514 BIlSI/91 Bl/31/91BARRICAD TEM-FRONT DEC27-JAN9 95.98 8.B~ 95.98
68-3551B B1131/91 ~1/31/91 LITTER CLEANUP JANI~-FEBG,91 591.18 B.88 591.1B
68-3552 81/51/91 e1/31/91 MATERIALS NOV !5-28, 9~ 39.45 ~.BB 39.45
68-35524 t1/31191 81131191TRAFF SIGNS REPL NOV29-DEC12 125.81 e.~B 125.8!
68-3553 81/51/91 B1/31/91TRAFF CONT JEFF/FRT 0CT4-51.0 N5.16 8.0~ 205.16
68-3554 ~1151/91 B1/31/91 CLEAN DITCH, NOVI-14, 98 248.24 8.88 240.24
68-3559.2! B1/51/91 B1/31/91 TRAFF SIGN REP SEPT28 OCTS,ge 146.27 8.08 146.27
68-356&.28 B1/31/91 ~I/31/91MATEIALS MAIN/PUJOL SEPG-19.B 18.23 8.B8 18.23
68-3567+ B1/31/91 B1/31/91TRAFF CONT DEC 27- JAN 9,
68-35674 01/31/91 81/31/91 LITTER CLEANUP JAN1B-23, 91 328.77 B.~e 328.77
68-3567B 81/31/91 ~1/31191 LABOR,EQUIP JU112-25, 9~ 2,812.53 B.eB 2.812.53
68-3567C ~1/31/91 e1/31/91TRAFF SIGNS EQUIP NOVi-14, 98 1!1.51 8.~8 111.51
68-3569 Bl/31/91 81/31191MAZANO TRAFF SIGN OCT 4-17,98 65.24 ~.~ 63.24
68-35694 ~1/31/91 81/31/91TRAFF SIGN NOV 29-DEC 12, 9B 68.98 B.B8 68.98
68-3569B 81/31191 e1/51191TEM-NAZ TRAFF NOV [-28, 9e 131.24 B.BB 131.24
68-357B 81131191 B1/51/9! LITTER CLEANUP JAN I~-23,91 7e.55 ~.BB 70.55
68-3575 81/31/91 B1/31/91 LABOR SUPER JAN 24- FEB 6,91 277.15 8.80 277.15
68-3579 01i31191 81131191 CLEAN BITCH OCT 1B-3!, 98 884.67 B.B~ 884.67
68-35794 81131/~I 81/31/91TRAFF SIGNS NOV29-DEC 12, 9~ 1,877.29 B.80 1~877.29
6G-3579B 81/51/91 81/31/91 MATERIALS DEC U-JAN 9.9i 56.2~ 8.80 5S.2~
68-3579C 81/31/91 81/31/91 CLEAN DITCH NOV 1-11, 98 653.07 8.80 653.e7
6B-3583 BI/51/91 Bl151/91 TREE TRIM PAUBA/YNEZ OCT 9B 462.85 8.BB 462.85
68-3585 81/31/91 81/31/91TRAFF SIGN JAN 1B- 23, 91 112.39 0.08 !!2.37
68-35854 8i/31/~I 81131/91TRAFF SIGN TEMIPIO DEC-JAN91 155.29 0.B8 155.27
68-3587.17.1/~[/~1 e1/31/91PUJOL TRAFF SIGN AUG 23-SEP5
~ .... a8.74 e.eB 68.74
68-3588 81/31/91 e1/31/91 RAINBOW PATCHING NOV!5-2B,gB 157.&! B.e~ !57.6!
68-3588.21 81/31191 BII31191 RAINBOW ENG SERV SEP 28-0CT3 95.77 B.8~ 95.77
68-3588.18 B1/31/9! Bi/31/91 RAINBOW PATCH MIX AU69-22,9~ 39.16 B.B~ 39.16
68-3588B 81/31/91 8LI31191 RAINBOW PATCH JUL!2-AUG8,9~ 299.1B 8.0~ 299.1~
68-35884 81131191 Bl/51/91 RAINBOW PATCH JAN24-FEB 6,91 246.B6 O.~B 246.86
68-3589.21 B1/31/9! 81/31/91 RANCHO/DIAZ PATCH SEPT2~-OCT3 22B.$I e.B~ 228.51
68-3589.19 e1131/9! Bl/31/91 RANCHO TRAFF AUG 25 SEPT5 9B 115.71 e.BB 113.7!
68-3589 elt31191 e1/31/91RANCHO SIGNS JAN 24-FEBG. 91 55.57 e. BO 55.37
68-358'?A ~1/31/91 81/31/91RANCHO SIGNS DEC 27-JANg, 91 658.9i 8.88 658.9!
68-3589B 81/31/91 81131/91RANCHO CLEAN/SIGN NOV29-DEC2~ 265.78 ~.e8 265.78
68-3589C BI/51191 81/31/91 RANCHO LABOR NOV >28,98 351.15 e.8~ 351.15
&8-S589D 81131/91 ~i/31/91 LITTER CLEANUP jULI-11.9B 78.55 e.88 7B.55
68-3591 81/31/91 Bi131191RANCHO PATCH JUL26-AUBG. 90 109.45 e.88 189.45
6e-35914 81/31/91 ei/31191RANCHO EQUIP NOV29-DEC26.g8 156.73 B.80 136.75
68-35~1.1~ 81/J1/91 0!/31/91RANCHO/YNEZ/CALLE AU~9-22.ge 39.16 ~.B8 39.16
68-3604 81131/g1 e1/31i91 SOLANA/YNEZ/DEL EQUIP NOV 90 124.6i 8.88 124.61
68-3&B44 ~I/31/91 0!/31/91SOLANA/YNEZ/DEL NOV/DEC98 24.16 e. OB 24.16
68-3614 ~!/31/9[ 0!/31/9! VALLEJO/SANT/YNEZ CLEAN NOVgB le5.85 ~.88 185.~3
68-36144 01/31/9! gi/31/91VALLEJO/SANT/YNEZ EQ DEC jAN i18.15 e.88 !!~.IS
68-36148 81/31/9! e!/31/91VALLEJ/SANT/YNEZ DEC-JAN23.9! 14!.!~ ~.~ L41.!3
~ll':: City of Te~ecuia Fatal
Fiscal Tsar: :~?l Check Register Sialion: l!?l:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
68-3654 81/51i91 01/51/91 VILLA/PAUBA TREE TRIM 0CT4-17 248.46 8.80 248.46
~8-3643 81151/9I 81131191 WINCH TRAF CONTR DEC27-jANQ,1 231.48 ~.88 231.48
68-3643.18 81/31/91 81/31R1 WIN~/DIAZ MATER. AUG g-22,98 31.64 B.BB 31.64
68-3643.19 81/31/?1 B1151/91WINCH/DIAZ PAINT AUG23-SEPS.B 215.25 e.B8 215.25
68-3644 81/51/91 81/31/91YNEZ/JEDED CLEAN NOV1-14, 98 997.12 8.88 997.12
68-3644A B1/51/?i 0113!/91YNEZ/JUDED TREE TRIM NOV/DEC 748.51 8.88 748.51
68-36448 ~1/51/91 81/31/91YNEZ/JEDED LITTER CLEAN JUL9B 188.15 ~.80 188.15
68-3644C 81/31/91 el/31/91YNEZ/JED TREE TRIM 0CT4-17,98 188,81 8.88 188.81
68-3649.28 81/51/91 Bl/51/91 BAY/RAINBOW/TOUR MATER SEPT 22.51 8.~e 22.51
68-3649,21 81/31/91 81/31/91 BAY/RAINBOW/TOURN Si6 SEP OCT 86.16 8.88 86.16
68-3651 81131191 81/51191BOR/COS/MILKY PATCH NOV DEC 8 99.15 8.88 99.13
68-3653 BII31/~1 81/31R1 CARRILLO/VALL/JED CLEAN NOV 248.24 8.Be 248.24
68-3655.2! 81/51/91 ~1/31/91 CALL/VIA/BEN KEAR SIGN SEP OC 599.18 8.88 399.18
68-3688.21 81/31/91 81/31/91 JEFF/WINCH/CHERRY PATCH SE OC 254.64 0.88 254.64
684681 81/31/91 ~1/31/9t JEFF/WINCH/CHERR SIGN OCT 98 75.78 8.~8 95.98
684684.19 81/31R1 81131/91MARG/BEN/LA SER GRAVEE AUB-SE 648.53 8.88 648.5~
68-3684 81151191 ~1/31/91 ~RB/DEN KEAR/LA S. TREE OCT 249.92 B.B~ 249.92
68-3684A 81131/9! e1/31/?1 MARS/BEN KEAR/LA S CLEA NO-DE 99.13 0.88 99.13
68-3698.18 81/31191 81131/91 SPICA CRTI~OSS MATER AUG 98 49.51 8.8~ 49.51
684693 81/31/91 81/31/?1 SANTA/MIRA/COSMIC PATCH NOV 128.83 8.88 128.83
68-3698.19 81/31191 81131/91SPICAICROSS SIGN AUG SEP 98 79.19 8.~e 79.19
68-3788.!8 81/31/91 81/31/9! TEAT/IRON MATER AUG 9-22,98 72.82 0.88 72.~2
68-5781 B1/51/91 81151/91 MORENO/FRONT DEC 13-2&~ 98 7~.55 B.8~ 78.55
68-3684.28 84/~1/91 8&/81/?1MAINT.SEPT/9e; 3.38 B.BB 3.38
68~36888 e4/81/91 ~4/B1/91MAINT.NOV./?e 198.42 8.88 198.42
6845438 84/~1/91 84/~1/91 ROAD MAINT. NOV,VB-DEC.9~ 5,386.91 8.88 3~38a.91
W068-3567 84/81191 84/81/91 LABOR:EQUIPMENT:7/12-7/25 2 8~? 53 8.88 2,812.55
W068-3591 84181191 84/81/91 ~BOR;EQUIPMENT;7/26-8/8/?l 189.45 8.BB !09.45
W068-3588 t4/81/91 84/81/91LABOR;EQUIPMENT;7112-8t8198 299,18 B.B8 299.18
W068-3551 84/81/91 84181/91LABOR;EQUIPMENT;7/26-8/8/QB 429.57 8.ee 429.57
W068-3644 84t~1/9! 04t8119! LABOR:EQUIPMENT:71!-7/I!/QB t88.I3 ~.80 10~.13
W068-3549 B4/el/QL 84181191 LABOR;EQUIP. 7/1-7/11/9~ 86.89 8.88 86.09
W068-3511 84/81/91 84/81/91LBR:EQUIP;7Ii2-7125-7/26-B/8 58?.78 B.B8 589.78
W088-3589 84181/91 84/81191LABORIEQUIh 7/I-7/11/9~ 78.55 8.88 78.55
W0683632 84IB1/91 04/~1i91 LABOR; 3/21-4/~/91 58.95 8.8 58.?5
W068-3548 84/81/91 84/81/?I LABOR;EQUIP; 3/21-4/3/91 588.53 8.88
W068-32~3 04/81191 84/e1/71 LABOR;EQUIP; 3/21-413191 257.18 B.B8 257.18
W068-3566 84i81/?1 84181191 LABOR;EQUIP;5/21-4/3/91 177,84 e. BB 177.84
W068-3579 84/B1/91 84181/71 LABOR:EQUIP; 3121-4/5 991.42 ~.Be 991.42
~068-3614 84/~1/?1 84/81191 LABOR;EQUIP; 3/21-413/91 1,288,69 ~.8~ 1.280.69
W068-3627 84181191 84/~1/91 LABOR;EQUIP; 3/21-4/5 588.57 8.88 588.57
W068-3643 84181/?I 84/81/91 LABOR;EQUIP; 3/2!-41319t I~3.77 e.88 133.77
W068-3701 84/~1/?1 84/81/91 LABOR;EQUIP; 3/2!-413191 287,?8 8.88 287,98
W068-3536 84/e1/91 84/81/91 LABOR;EQUIP; 3/21-4/3/91 167.81 8,08 167.81
W068-3684 841~I/9! ~4/81/9! LABOR;EQUIP: 3/21-4/5/9! 91.25 e.80 91.25
W0683567-1 84/81/91 84/81/91 LABOR; 3/21-4183/91 5~.~6 8.80 58.66
W0683588-1 84181191 84181/91 LABOR; EQUIP. 3/2>413/91 218.79 ~.88 218.79
WOa83589-1 84i81/91 84/81/9~ LABOR; EQUIP. 3/2!-4/3 816.11 8.88 816.1!
W0683591-I 04/81/?1 04/B1/~1 LABOR; EQUIP, 5/2>4/3 346.3~ 0.8~ 546.38
W068364~-I 04101191 04/81/91 LABOR: EQUIP. 3121-4i3 282.48 0.80 282.40
~0683549-! 04/01/91 04/01/91 LABOR: EQUIP, 5/2!-4/5 158,78 0,80 !58,7~
W068-3535 04/~1/91 04/01/~1 LABOR;EQUIP. 2/21-3/6 374.33 0.0~ 374,~3
W068-3537 04/81/91 04/01/91 LABOR; 2/2>3/6 !25.64 8.08 125.54
W068-3544 04/01/91 84/81/91LABOR;EQUIP,MTRLS;2/2!-3/6 2~6,6~ 0,88 '246.66
W068-3569 84/81191 84/01/91 LABOR: MATERIALS; 2/21-3/6 29.38 8.~0 29.38
W068-3575 04/01/91 04181/91LABOR:SUPERV:EQUIP:2/2!-3/6 7~6.~1 ~.80 746.61
~O,5~-T~Oo ~"~,~Oi O4/~I/Q1 EQUIP.LABOR: c'/:-~/6
c~ ..... 7:.21 2" '~...
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description ~ross Discount Net
W068-3681 84181191 84/81/91
W068-3647 84181i91 04/51/91
WDBB-S&51 84/81/91 84/81/91
W068-3684 84/8i/91 54/B1/91
W065-3557 84/81/91 84/81/91
W068-3697 84181191 54/~1191
W065-3572 84/81/9I
W068-3552 84181/91 84/~1/91
W065-3516 84/81/91 84/51/91
W068-3616 ~4i81191
WOa8-3655 84/81/9! 84/81/91
W068-3~444 84/~1/91 84/51/91
WD68-35494 ~4/51/V1 84/81/~1
WO68-3546A 84151191 84/Bl/91
WD68-35794 84181191 84181191
W068-36844 84/81191 84/01/~1
WD65-3557A 84/81/91 54/81/91
W065-35754 ~4/81/91 84/~1/91
WD65-35795 84/~1/91 84/81/91
WO&8-3511A 84181/91 84/~1/91
WD68-35495 84/51/91 ~4/51/91
WO65-35514 84/81/91
WO65-36274 84/81/~1 84/81/91
W068-36844 54/81/91 84/51/91
WD65-35914 84/81/91 84/81/91
W068-35515 84i~1/91 84/81/91
W068-3549C 84/81/~! 84/81/~1
W068-36845 84184191
W068-~915 54/~4/91 84/54/91
W068-3598 84/84/91
W068-~5665 84/84/91 84/~4/91
W068-3~5~ 84/~4/91 84/54/91
W068-36845 ~4/04/91 ~4/84/91
W068-3553 ~4/~4/91 ~4/54/91
W068-36275 84/54/9! 84/54/9!
W068-35575 54/~4/91 ~4/54/91
LABOR:EQUIP. 2/2>3/6
LABOR:EQUIP.MTRLS; 2/2>5/6
EQUIP.LABOR] 2/7-3/6
CLAIMS:LABOR; 2/7-3/6
LABOR; 2/21-3/6
LABOR;EQUIP.MTRLS; 2/21-3/6
3/7-3/2~;LABOR;EQUIP.
LABOR;EQUIP;3/7-3/28
LABOR;EQUIP;2/7-2/28
LABOR;EQUIP;2/7-2/28
LABOR;EQUIP;2/7-2/28
CLAIMS;LABOR &EQUIP.2/7-3/28
LABOR;EQUIP.2/2!-3/6
LABOR;EQUIP. 2/21-3/6
NAIRLS;LABOR;EQUIP.2/7-3/6
LABOR:EQUIP.
LABOR;EQUIP. 5/7-3/28
LABOR;EQUIP· 3/7-3/2~
LABOR;EQUIP. 5/7-3/28
LABOR;EQUIP; 3/7-3/28
LABOR;EQUIP; 3/7-3/28
LABOR:EQUIP; 3/7-3/28
LABDR;EQUIP; 5/7-3/28
LABOR;EQUIP; 3/7-3/2~
LABDR;EQUIP; 2/7-2/2~
LABOR;EQUIP; 2/7-2/28
LABOR:EQUIP; 2/7-2/28
LABOR!EQUIP;CLAIMS~4/4-4/17
LABOR EQUIP;4/4-4/17
LABOR:EQUIP;4/4-4/17
LABOR:EQUIh 4/4-4/17
LABOR:EQUIP; 4/4-4/17
LABOR:EQUIP; 4/4-4/17
LABOR:EQUIP;CLAIMS;2/7-4/17
LABOR 4/4-4/17
LABOR;EQUIP; 4/4-4/17
129.66 8.58 129.46
~ ~ 8.H 95.!3
286.99 E.88 286.99
555.5~ 8.H 553.50
75.58 8.88 75.30
95.13 8.88 ~5.13
146.42 8.80 146.42
i66. I2 i).{)8 166.12
43.85 ~.H 43.SB
122.5~ 8.88 122.5~
117.55 8.88 117.35
284.52 8.88 284.52
122.85 ~.H !22.83
1,427.42 8.8~ 1,427.42
71.87 8.66 71.97
2!9.92 LOg 2!9.82
2,625.8{) 9.86 2,625.88
4,128.74 8.88 4,128.74
355.42 8.88 353.42
317.12 8.80 317.12
148.55 0.89 148.35
481.85 0.88 451.88
91.25 8.88 91.25
79.19 8.88 79.19
215.95 8.90 213.95
I57.77 ~.~ 157.77
112.75 8.89 112.75
116.51 8.Be !18.31
352.29 8.88 352.29
151.99 ~.88 151.99
231.91 e.ae 231.91
95.84 8.88 95.84
158.{)4 8.98 158.84
125.65 8.85 125.65
151.o. 9 8.80 151.99
Check Totals:
61,527.83 B.BB 81,527.83
Report Totals:
136,558.89 ~.80 [36.558.89
Chec~ Register
Check
Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description
............................................. T~T~'T~'__'TTT
.~7683 08/25/91COUNTYTR COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE
888 87121191 87121191
7H 87111191 27121191
721 2712119! 87/21/91
722 87/81/91 87/21/91
783 07/91/91 87/91191
784 87/21/91 87191191
7~5 87/21/91 87/91/91
Tea 27/21/91 27/ei/91
707 87/01/91 87/11/91
788 27/~1/91 97/81/91
799 27/21/91 87/81/91
718 27/~1/91 87181191
715 97/91/91 87/21/91
724 27/81/91 ~7/21/91
797 87/81/91 97181/91
79~ 87181191 87/81191
799 81/81R1 27/21/91
79>1 87/81/91 87/21/91
798-1 87/B1R1 ~7/91/91
791-I 07/Bl/91 97/91191
796-1 87/21/91 87/81/91
724-1 87/21/91 27/e1/91
725-1 87/21/91 27121191
795-I 97191191 27181191
787-1 87/81/91 87/81/91
782-1 ~7/el/91 87/81/91
865299 87/91/91 27/21/91
799-I 87191191 87/81/91
SIGNAL MAINT. 7/1/99-5/29/9I
SIGNAL MAINT 711198-5129191
SIGNAL NAINT 7/1/92-5/29/91
SIGNAL NAINT 7/1/9F5/29191
SIGNAL MAINT 7/1/98-5/29R1
SIGNAL NAINT 7/1/98-5/29/91
SIGNAL ~AINT 711192-5129191
SIGNAL NAINT 7/1/~-5/29/91
SIGNAL ~AINT 71119F5129/91
SIGNAL NAINT 7/1/92-5/29/91
SIGNAL NAINT 7/1/92-5/29/91
SIGNAL ~AINT 711198-5129/91
SIGNAL NAINT 711192-5129191
SIGNAL ~AINT 711191-5129/91
SIGNAL NAINT 711198-512919!
SIGNAL NAINT 711RI-5129191
SIGNAL MAINT 7/I/gFS/29RI
SIGNAL NAINT 1/11981/38/98
SIGNAL ~AINT 1/119e-~/32/98
SIGNAL MAINT 111192-~132192
SIGNAL ~AINT
SIGNAL NAINT
SIGNAL MAI~ I11/92-6/58/99
SIGNAL NAINT 1/I/981138/92
SIGNAL NAINT 1/1/921/38/99
SIGNAL NAINT
ADJUST BILLI~ PER COUNTY
SIGNAL NAINT/i/1/981/38/98
Check Totals:
80067685 88/23/91COUNTYHD CO.OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH DEPT.
272491 27/24/91 27/21/91 CREDIT NENO/DLIPLICATE CHGS
848A~I 87/e1191 97181191ENVOIRNENTAL/APRIL SERV
929291 87/9!/91 87/81/91ENVOIRNENTAL/FEBRUARY SERV
(B58191 ~719LIgl 971~I191ENVOIRMENTAL/~AY SERV
2~2191 87/81/~I 87/e1/91ENVOIR~ENTAL/JUNE SERVICES
Check Total.,
i,919.14
2,7B4.79
4,244.92
6,562.58
4,493.96
6~139.86
2,9~2.71
~,416.94
1,132.94
994,76
~4~.16
661.2B
2,4B7.87
4,586.54
5,282.98
3,385.42
3,214.94
3,823.18
j,989.14
1,476.75
1,237.74
814.45
2,161.48
872.91
1,~.14-
2,285.87
76,297.27
7,951.92-
2,666.22
945.29
Paoe: :
Statie~: L1?34
Discount Net
2.82 1,919.14
8.82 2,784.79
2.22 4,844.92
~.H 6,562.5~
2.92 4,483.96
8,22 6,139.86
8.H 2,932.71
2.82 7,414.94
8.88 5,525.28
8.H 1,132J4
8.88 994.76
8.88 545.16
2.21 661.28
8.88 2~487.87
2.89 4,586.54
9.12 - 5,282.98
6.69 3,385.42
e.ee 3,214.94
2,82 1,989.14
8.H 867,9B
2,H 1,47~,75
2.26 1,237.74
2.99 814.45
8.68 2,1~1.48
2,88 872.91
2.88 1,936.14-
ILH 2,255.87
76,297.87
2,29 7,951.H-
2,784.88
.CHECK TOTALS
$79,003.07
ITEM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER~
CITY MANAGER'D~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
September 10, 1991
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Twelve
Months Ended June 30, 1991
That the City Council:
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 1991.
2. Adopt Resolution 91- to amend the Fiscal Year 1990-91 Budget
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited
activity of the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1991. The audited
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will be completed during October 1991.
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 1991
Resolution 91- to amend the FY 1990-91 Budget
Attachment "A"
(J
E
-,4
0
,--I
r-I
0
s
-.-I
~ 0
(~
~-0~
-H4J 0
U~[.z.,
rj
00~2
~, II
a:) II
I.,11 II
II
II
II
II
I|
II
II
II
II
II
,-I II
['-. II
~ II
- II
~1~ II
I.~ II
O II
- II
C~1 II
II
II
II
II
II
13'1 II
P1 II
¢0 II
- II
¢xl II
0,1 II
~) II
- II
I.~ II
II
II
II
~1-
II
,,~ II
~ II
,-I II
- II
cO II
~ II
I./1 II
- II
P1 II
II
II
~q
-,4~ 0
-H
m
-H
4-)
rn
0
r,,)
m
0
(1)
0
,I-)
-,-I
,IJ )~
m
H
,-m U
U q)
m rJ
m
(1)
,IJ
-H
q~
-H
-H
0
~ m
0 ·
-H
0
rn
-,-I
,IJ
0
,I-)
m
rn
-H
rJ
0
,IJ
m
0
r-I
0
~-~
m
0
m
-H
· = 0
-H
~ 0
'0 0
~-I
~) 0
-,.~
-H
r-I
0
m
~-I
0
-H
0
-,-e
~ m
-H ~}
-H N
~ 0
0 ~
H rn
0
-H
-,-I
m
rn
-rl
U 'H
:> 0
-,'1
'H U
~ 0
'H
~ rn
n~
U
m
-H
0
U
0
m
-H
-H
0
u,..i
-~
N c,
.u 0
q~ rj
,-I
-1-1 -H
'0 0
J::: m
q) 0
0 .P
O-.-m
m .P
~ 0
-e-I C.
,-I
H 0
C~ m
-H q)
m
N 0
0 0
m
u~ (1) ~
rO
~ +
0 CO
m 0
m rn m
I.-m q)-H-H
O
OH~H~mO~O0000~O~
u ~ rn U ca
cn C:.P~m
-H~x, p, rn
M ~wCm O~
~ .IJ-H
m n~
q)
C:-~ m
-H -H -,-I r,.)
~.C)~l-,-4,u~mnrn~>mtI-HrJ
0 I~-~ ~u,-4 ~ a~ ~ 0 ~ · 0,-~
In
q) mq)m
-H ~ -H 0
0
O o
-H -H ~
n:l ~1 -H
mwm
~-H~U0rn
.mJ -H q) I:: -H
m mrJ~
-H .tJ -H ~ H m
)-m~J),40 -H 0
Grn:::l
r,,.DGhj
E]Or~
Old.c:
-H.IJ 0
r, Jr.n~
~l'OG
0 ·
H rJ
~0
H
H
H
~0
H
zJl-
O
L~
O
O
~0
H
O
~0
tfi O
i~ O
~l~ O
I~ H
I~ O
~ O
\
rn
· ~)
II
H II
~ II
~ II
- II
~. II
~ II
I~1 II
- II
~ II,
II
II
II
~1 II
I'- II
H II
- II
m II
tfi II
I.fi II
- II
~1 II
II
H
\
O
\
O
O
O
O
O
0
-,~
0
-H
-,-t
0
0
-H
0
0
r4
m
U
-,44J 0
m
-H
U
0
m
(J
m
m
-rl
0
t~
~ O~
0
rj -H
0
q~ rJ
0
· l 0
0 ·
-H ,--7
U o~
-H'l::l a~ ~J q) n:l O
,-mG ~ H q::lrj
,cI,u j~ O
~1 ~1 4J N ~ n~-H O
~ -H G r4 q-I -H
-H
O~ O~ -H C~ rj ~ .mJ -H
a~ a~ H .U -H
~h ~ qJ I~ ~ -H -H O
-H ,-4
m m ) )> -H
E4 U 0 rn ,-4 I~ 0
q~ ~ .u O
q:l I~q~ q) a~ m OO
I~ -H q) -H o~
q) ~ D H M -H
iJ . ~ rnq;
q) {m:l m q-I m q:l ~ m
ra .u a$ -H N o ~ q) -H
~1 ,u N rnq.l
~ eN 0 ~m ~ -H
m~eN ~ a}-H N ~rn
.P iJ t~ N N ,--m u,-m
I~ G 0 n~ 0
q) ~I.C:N .~ ~m rn
~.u m O~
,H 0 C~ G i.J m -.-m
~ ~ p, rj
O ~) N -d q-l G I~q-I N,C o
N,UH o ~0
0 H ~ N
x 'X:IG-H .mJ
G -d -H ~1 .X:i
,-4 iJn),u -Hm qJC~ ~ m4J Or,.~
O I~ ~ I~ -H O 4J q)
m W O ~ N W ) U r~i~ -H
-m t)'m G
II
f~ II
~ II
C~1 II
- II
0 II
CO II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
~I
0
-~--Nm ~
· 0 0
II
C4 II
~} II
Lll II
- II
~rl II
LI1 II
~1 II
II
II
II
II
II
P1 II
s-4 II
0 II
- II
O~ II
Ol II
C,1 II
II
II
II
Eo.p~l
rj
m
m ~
a) 0
~ (]1 .I-J
o'xr.) ,-i
..-,-I m-,.4 ~ ~ m
~ II
nl II
r-. II
U'l II
- II
Lfi II
I.~ II
Lfi II
- II
cl II
~ II
II
II
~0
11
r- Lfi II
I.fi 0 II
[" ~ II
- II
0 II
0'1 II
(vl II
- II
ffl II
II
||
II
II
II
I'- (~1 ||
~ ~ ||
I'- ~,~
- II
~ II
ffl II
CO II
II
II
II
II
mm
0
C)
C)
m-.I
n:l
C)
m'-'l
,U
(1)
m-I
0
-H
0
m
m
O~
~-~
-~o
0
II
~ II
· 1~ II
~ II
- II
~-I II
O~ II
i" II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
~1' II
lfi II
lfi II
- II
~ II
[" II
~ II
II
II
II
II
0
0
~-I
~J
~-I
~4
o
-,-I
o
m
0 ~
0
-H m
0 I~
..H~
~ II
ag II
~ II
· 1' II
~ II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
CO
rl
0
E-,
II
!'- II
LI1 II
O0 II
- II
C4 II
rfl II
I;~ II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
i71 II
0 II
~1~ II
- II
~1~ II
0 II
O~ II
II
II
II
II
E~
:>
0
..
-H
0
o
o
o
o
II
0% II
~1e II
~-t II
- II
s-I II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I|
II
0 II
O0 II
0 II
- II
~-I II
II
II
II
II
II
II
\
0
\
r,,zl
0
0
~ 0
U
n.
U
0
0
0
CD
0
ee
0
0
0
0
0
0
t-I
0
0
~ II
LI"I II
Ul II
Pf'l II
~ II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
~ II
0 II
0 II
0 II
- II
0 II
~' II
~ II
II
II
II
II
~ II
~ II
· 1~ II
(~1 II
- II
e-l II
~ II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 1990-91 BUDGET AS DETAILED IN
ATrACH1VIENT "A"
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1. That the FY 1990-91 Annual Budget of the City of Temecula is hereby
amended as detailed in Attachment "A" .
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED, PASSED AND ADOFrED, this 10th day of September, 1991.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
4\Reao~195 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 91- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 10th day of September, 1991 by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
4\Relo0195 2
ATTACHMENT A
BUDGET TRANSFERS
· TRANSFER FROM:·
A/C No.
.CITY::COU:NCIL.
001-100-999-42-
5267
Descrip.
Social
Services
CITY MANAGER"
001-110-999-40-
5100
PLANNING
001-161-999-44-
5602
001-161-999-40-
5100
001-1 61-999-40-
51XX
001-161-999-42-
5256
001-161-999-42-
5250
001-161-999-42-
523O
001-301
Salaries
Office
Equipment
Salaries
Benefits
Public
Notices
Other
Outside
Services
Postage
Unreserved
Fund
Balance
Amount
$9,621.00
$10,825.00
$3,000.00
$60,000.00
$18,800.00
$6,000.00
$1,000.00
$500.00
$274,944
TRANSFER TO:
A/C No.
001-199-999-
42-5226
001-110-999-
42-5248
001-161-999-
42-5248
Descrip.
Dues/
Member-
ships
Consulting
Consulting
Amount
$9,621.00
$10,825.00
364,244.00
4\I~so, 195 3
TRANSFER FROM:
A/C No. Descrip. Amount
BUILDING'& SAFETY':: ':'i..; '...
001-162-999-40- Salaries
5100
001-301
ENGINEERING
001-163-999-42-
5230
001-301
Unreserved
Fund
Balance
Postage
Unreserved
Fund
Balance
PUBLIC WORKS
001-164-999-42- Street
5407 Sweeping
001-165-999-42- Traffic
5400 Admn.
NONDEPARTMENTAL
001-199-999-42- Rent-Office
5234
$4,770.00
$16,008.00
$1,100.00
$324,414
$24,900.00
$10,400.00
$9,100.00
TRANSFER TO:
A/C No. Descrip. Amount
001-162-999- Benefits
40-51XX
001-163-999- Salaries
40-5100
001-163-999- Benefits
40-51XX
001-163o999-
42-5248
Consulting
001-164-999- Traffic
42-5405 Signal
Maint.
001-165-999- Salaries
40-5100
001-165-999- Benefits
40-51XX
001-199-999-
999-42-5219
Temporary
Improvmts.
$20,778
$4,440.00
$3,474.00
$317,600
$24,900.00
$7,500.00
$2,900.00
$9,100.00
4\]~os195 4
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
DESCRIPTION:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
September 10, 1991
Amended Agreements for the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency
Mark Rhoades
APPROVE the proposed amended agreements for the
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, and;
DIRECT the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
agreements and forward them to the Riverside
County Habitat Conservation Agency for execution.
On August 16, 1991, Staff received copies of the amended
agreements for the Riverside County Habitat Conservation
Agency (R.C.H.C.A.). The R.C.H.C.A. has requested that
said agreements receive the proper signatures. The
documents are then to be returned to the R.C.H.C.A. for
full execution by the balance of the member agencies.
Once all the member agencies have responded to the
R.C.H.C.A. request, the City of Temecula will receive fully
executed versions of the amended agreements·
Brief Descriptions of the amended agreements are as
follows:
The Second Amendment to the Agreement
Regarding Allocation of Take; An amendment to
include the City of Corona in the J.P.A.
The Third Amendment to the Agreement Regarding
Allocation of Take; An amendment granting
S\STAFFRPT~RCHCA 1
additional allocation of take to cities which have
acquired replacement habitat.
The First Amendment to the Agency Agreement-
California Endangered Species Permit; An
amendment to add the City of Corona to the agency
agreement.
The Second Amendment to the Implementation
Agreement: An amendment to add the City of
Corona as a party to the agreement.
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding
Contributions to the R.C.H.C.A.; A memorandum
binding the City of Corona to the provisions of the
J.P.A.
The Third Amendment to the Joint Exercise of
Powers Agreement Creating the R.C.H.C.A.; An
amendment making the City of Corona a member
agency of the R.C.H.C.A.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE the proposed amended agreements
for the Riverside County Habitat Conservation
Agency, and;
DIRECT the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
agreements and forward them to the Riverside
County Habitat Conservation Agency for
execution.
MR:vgw
S\STAFFRPTXRCHCA 2
County Administrative O~'ce
August 5, 1991
Mr. Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
SUBJECT:
Dear Gary,
Attached are
by the Board
1.
2.
3.
Gary N. Cottrell
Chief Adm inistrative Officer
Mischeile Zimraerman
Assistant CAO
AMENDED AGREEMENTS FOR THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
the following amendments to RCHCA agreements which have been approved
of Directors:
Second Amendment to Agreement Regarding Allocation of Take;
Third Amendment to Agreement Regarding Allocation of Take;
First Amendment to Agency Agreement - California Endangered Species
Permit;
4. Second Amendment to Implementation Agreement;
'5. Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Contributions to the Riverside
County Habitat Conservation Agency;
6. Third Amendment to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency.
Please execute each counterpart with original signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk, and
then return all documents to me. When all RCHCA members have returned executed
Robert T. Andersen Administrative Center
4080 LEMON STREET · 12TH FLOOR · RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 · (714) 275-1100 * FAX (714) 275-1105
documents I will forward fully executed versions to you for your files.
assistance.
Sincerely,
Brian Loew
Executive Director
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
Thanks for your
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
REGARDING ALLOCATION OF TAKE
This SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT REGARDING ALLOCATION
OF TAKE ("Second Amendment") is made and entered into by and
among the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("the County"), THE CITY OF HEMET,
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, THE CITY OF
PERRIS, THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA and THE CITY
OF CORONA ("Cities") and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY (the "JPA").
RECITALS
A. The County, the JPA and the Cities of HEMET, LAKE
ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS and RIVERSIDE have previously
entered into that certain agreement entitled "AGREEMENT REGARDING
ALLOCATION OF TAKE" ("Original Agreement").
B. The City of TEMECULA became a party to the
Original Agreement pursuant to the FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
REGARDING ALLOCATION OF TAKE.
C. The County, the Cities and the JPA desire to amend
the Original Agreement to include the CITY OF CORONA.
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Section 1. MAXIMUM ALLOCATION OF PERMITTED TAKE
of the Original Agreement is amended to read as follows:
SCS6574
-1-
"1. MAXIMUM ALLOCATION OF PERMITTED TAKE
The parties acknowledge and agree that the HCP and
Implementation Agreement authorize cumulative
incidental take of SKR during the two-year term of the
short-term HCP in an amount not to exceed 4,400 acres,
or 20%, of the total occupied habitat of the SKR within
the HCP fee area, whichever is less (such authorized
incidental take shall hereinafter be referred to as the
"Permitted Take"). Unless modified pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement, each of the parties hereto
shall be allocated a fixed percentage of the Permitted
Take during the two-year term of the HCP as follows:
County of Riverside 41.47%
City of Riverside 34 %
City of Lake Elsinore 8 %
City of Moreno Valley 4 %
City of Perris 4.71%
City of Hemet 2 %
City of Temecula 1.17%
City of Corona 4.65%
In order to calculate each party's total Permitted
Take during the two-year term of the HCP, the party's
fixed percentage referenced above is multiplied by the
total number of acres subject to take. To illustrate,
assuming a maximum total Permitted Take of 4,400 acres,
each party's maximum share of the Permitted Take
expressed in acres would be as follows:
SCS6574
-2-
County of Riverside
City of Riverside
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Perris
City of Hemet
City of Temecula
City of Corona
1,825 acres
1,496 acres
352 acres
176 acres
207 acres
88 acres
51 acres
205 acres
The actual amount of occupied habitat on which
incidental take would be allowed could be less than
described above if it is determined during the two-year
term of the Section 10(a) Permit that less than 4,400
acres of occupied SKR habitat exist within the
boundaries of the HCP fee area, as amended from time to
time."
II. Section 2.A. Impact Fee Acquisitions. of the
Original Agreement is amended to read as follows:
"A. Impact Fee Acquisitions. For each acre of
occupied replacement habitat acquired in accordance
with the requirements of the HCP and Implementation
Agreement using monies collected from the impact fee
ordinances of the various parties, or occupied habitat
acquired in lieu of payment of said impact fees, each
party hereto will be allocated a percentage of the
resulting Permitted Take as follows:
(1) During the first semi-annual period
following the issuance of the Section 10(a) Permit,
each party will be allocated a fixed percentage of
SCS6574
-3-
Permitted Take resulting from "impact fee
SCS6574
acquisitions," as follows:
County of Riverside 51.47%
City of Riverside 25 %
City of Moreno Valley 6 %
City of Lake Elsinore 5 %
City of Perris 4.71%
City of Hemet 2 %
City of Temecula 1.17%
City of Corona 4.65%
For illustration purposes only, if the JPA or
another entity acting on behalf of the JPA acquires
500 acres of replacement habitat during the first semi-
annual period after the issuance of the Section 10(a)
Permit using monies collected from impact fees, the
County of Riverside would be allocated fifty-one and
forty-seven one hundredths percent (51.47%) of such 500
acres, or 257 acres of Permitted Take; the City of
Riverside twenty-five percent (25%) of such 500 acres,
or 125 acres of permitted Take, etc.
In order to provide additional flexibility
for the Cities of Hemet and Temecula, each of which
only has a two percent (2%) or less share during the
first semi-annual period, it is contemplated by all the
parties hereto that Hemet and Temecula will be
permitted to exceed their proportionate shares of the
semi-annual Permitted Take pursuant to this Paragraph
2.A(1) so long as the total proportionate share of
Permitted Take for each of the above jurisdictions for
-4-
SCS6574
a semi-annual period would not exceed four percent
(4%); provided, however, that any additional allocation
of Permitted Take pursuant to this Paragraph 2.A(1)
shall require the prior written approval of the JPA.
It is further agreed that any increase in the
proportionate share of the Cities of Hemet or Temecula
pursuant to this Paragraph 2.A(1) shall, unless
otherwise agreed by the parties hereto, result in a
decrease, on a pro rata basis, of the shares of the
other parties.
(2) Commencing with the second semi-annual
period following the issuance of the Section 10(a)
Permit, the proportionate share of Permitted Take
resulting from acquisitions of replacement habitat
using impact fees during any semi-annual period will be
based solely on the cumulative impact fees contributed
to the JPA by the various parties. Cumulative
contributions of impact fees shall be calculated in
accordance with the terms of Section 3.10.1 of the
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the JPA.
Each party's share of Permitted Take under this
Paragraph 2.A(2) shall be adjusted on a semi-annual
basis unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
For illustration purposes only, if at the end
of the first semi-annual period the total cumulative
impact fee contributions equal fifteen million dollars,
-5-
with ten million dollars coming from the County of
Riverside, three million dollars from the City of
Riverside, one million dollars from the City of Moreno
Valley, etc., the proportionate share of Permitted Take
allocated to each of the parties during the second
semi-annual period from impact fee acquisitions would
be adjusted on a pro rata basis as follows: the County
would be allocated 66.7% of available Permitted Take,
the City of Riverside 20%, the City of Moreno Valley
6.6%, etc.
(3) Prior to the commencement of any semi-
annual period during the term of the HCP, the parties,
in consultation with the JPA and its consultants, shall
attempt to project the amount of replacement habitat
expected to be acquired during the upcoming semi-annual
period so that each party can determine in advance the
number of acres of Permitted Take to be allocated to
such party pursuant to this Paragraph 2.A during such
semi-annual period. Monthly updates on acquisitions of
replacement habitat will be provided to the parties by
the JPA pursuant to the Implementation Agreement."
SCS6574
-6-
III. Section 4. ANNEXATIONS of the Original Agreement
is amended to read as follows:
"4. ANNEXATIONS
In the event that County lands within the HCP area
are annexed by newly-incorporated cities or existing
cities not currently a party to this Agreement
(hereinafter, the "New City"), or existing cities which
are a party to this Agreement, it is contemplated that
the County's share of Permitted Take under Paragraph 1
above will be partially reallocated to any such city
based on the amount of the occupied habitat annexed to
or incorporated by such city that is subject to take
under the Section 10(a) Permit. For example, assume
that the New City has an estimated fifty (50) acres of
occupied habitat within its boundaries outside of study
areas. If the New City becomes a co-applicant under
the Section 10(a) Permit, the County would allocate a
pro rata percentage of its Permitted Take under
Paragraphs 1 and 2.A to the New City. Current
information indicates that there are approximately
5,382 acres of occupied habitat outside of study areas
that are subject to take. The New City's pro rata
share of the total is approximately ninety-three
hundredths percent (.93%) (50 + 5382 = .93%); thus,
subtracting the New City's ninety-three hundredths
percent (.93%) share from the County's forty-one and
-7-
SCS6574
forty-seven hundredths percent (41.47%) share of the
total Permitted Take would leave the County with a
forty and fifty-four hundredths percent (40.54%) share
of the total Permitted Take. The New City's propor-
tionate share of Permitted Take resulting from impact
fee acquisitions (Paragraph 2.A) would be based on the
amount of fees collected and contributed to the
program. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing to
the contrary, any reapportionment of any share of the
County's Permitted Take resulting from annexations or
incorporations shall be subject to the review and
written approval of the County."
IV. This Second Amendment shall take effect upon both
its execution by all of the parties and the recordation by the
executive officer of the Riverside County Local Agency Formation
Commission of a certificate of completion on Annexation No. 72 to
the City of Corona in substantially the same form as the
application for that Annexation stood amended on January 1, 1991.
This Second Amendment shall continue in force for the duration of
the Section 10(a) Permit.
SCS6574
-8-
V. The terms and conditions of the original agreement
not expressly amended by this Second Amendment shall continue in
full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date or dates below written.
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
Dated:
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
CITY OF CORONA
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF HEMET
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
-9-
SCS6574
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS6574
-10-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
SCS6574
-10-
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
-10-
SCS6574
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
SCS6574
-10-
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
-10-
SCS65~
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
SCS6574
-10-
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
-10-
SCS65~
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
-10-
SCS6574
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS6574
-10-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
SCS6574
-10-
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
REGARDING ALLOCATION OF TARE
This THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT REGARDING ALLOCATION
OF TAKE ("Second Amendment") is made and entered into by and
among the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("the County"), THE CITY OF HEMET,
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, THE CITY OF
PERRIS, THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA and THE CITY
OF CORONA ("the Cities") and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY (the "JPA" ) .
RECITALS
A. The County, the JPA and the Cities have previously
entered into that certain agreement entitled "AGREEMENT REGARDING
ALLOCATION OF TAKE", as amended ( "the Agreement" ) .
B. The County, the Cities and the JPA desire to amend
the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Section 2.A(2) of the Agreement is amended to add
the following at the end thereof:
"Notwithstanding anything set forth herein to
the contrary, with respect to the second
semi-annual period only, the allocation of
Permitted Take resulting from acquisitions of
replacement habitat using impact fees during
such second semi-annual period will be
allocated as follow:
DE013~94107111191
--1--
City of 'Corona
City of Perris
City of Lake Elsinore
191 acres
60 acres
186 acres
TOTAL 437 acres
The foregoing allocation of Permitted Take
for the second semi-annual period as
described above shall not limit the JPA from
allocating additional acres of replacement
habitat acquired or to be acquired during the
second semi-annual period on a proportionate
or other basis, as the JPA may decide."
II. The City of Lake Elsinore hereby reaffirms,
warrants and covenants that it shall remain a member of the JPA
and maintain its current Stephens' kangaroo rat mitigation fee
ordinance in full force and effect during the term of the Section
10(a) Permit with only such changes or amendments to such
ordinance as the JPA shall approve.
III. This Third Amendment shall take effect upon its
execution by all of the parties.
IV. The terms and conditions of the Agreement not
expressly amended by this Third Amendment shall continue in full
force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date or dates below written.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
DE01329~/07/11/91
-2-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF CORONA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF HEMET
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
-3-
DE013~94/07/11/91
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DEO1129&/OF/11/91
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DEO 13294/07/11/9 1
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DEO 1329/,/07/11/91
--4--
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
0E013294/07/11/91
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
D[O 13~94107/11/91
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DE013294/0?/11/91
--4--
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DE011294107/11/91
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DE01 ~29/,/07/11/91
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DE01329~,/07/11/91
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
DEO1329&/07/11/91
-4-
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGENCY AGREEMENT
CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGENCY AGREEMENT CALIFORNIA
ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT ("First Amendment") is entered into by
and among the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (the
"Department"), the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County"), the CITIES
OF HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE,
TEMECULA, and CORONA ("Cities") and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY (the "JPA").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Department, the County, the JPA and the
CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE,
and TEMECULA have entered into that certain AGENCY AGREEMENT
CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT ("Agency Agreement") dated
for reference purposes October 4, 1990;
WHEREAS, the Department, the County, the JPA and the
Cities desire to amend the Agency Agreement to include the CITY
OF CORONA as a party;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
foregoing recitals and mutual covenants and undertakings provided
herein, and other considerations, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Agency Agreement is hereby amended to add the
CITY OF CORONA as a party.
SCS4973
-1-
2. This First Amendment shall become effective upon
both its execution by all of the parties hereto and the
recordation by the executive officer of the Riverside County
Local Agency Formation Commission of a certificate of completion
on Annexation No. 72 to the City of Corona in substantially the
same form as the application for that Annexation stood amended on
January 1, 1991.
3. The terms and conditions of the Agency Agreement
not expressly amended by this First Amendment shall continue in
full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
First Amendment to the Agency Agreement as of the date or dates
set forth below.
Dated:
ATTEST:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH
ANDGAME
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
SCS4973
-2-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
SCS4973
-3-
CITY OF CORONA
By:
Mayor
CITY OF HEMET
By:
Mayor
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
-4-
SCS4973
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS4973
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS4973
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS497']
-4--
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS4973
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS497""5
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS4973
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
scs4973
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
-4-
SCS4973
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS4973
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
SCS4973
-4-
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
This SECOND AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
("Second Amendment") is made and entered into this day of
, 199~, by and among THE UNITED STATES FISH &
WILDLIFE SERVICE ("the FWS"), THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a
political subdivision of the State of California ("the County"),
THE CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS,
RIVERSIDE, TEMECULA and CORONA, all municipal corporations of the
State of California ("the Cities") and THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY, a public agency (the "JPA").
RECITALS
1. The FWS, the County, the CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE
ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS, and RIVERSIDE and the JPA have
previously entered into that certain agreement entitled
"IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT" ("Original Agreement").
2. The FIRST AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
made THE CITY OF TEMECULA a party to the Original Agreement.
3. The CITY OF CORONA has (i) adopted an SKR
mitigation fee ordinance, (ii) executed a SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT REGARDING ALLOCATION OF TAKE with the County and the
Cities regarding the CITY OF CORONA'S proportionate share of the
County's allocation of incidental take and (iii) has executed a
written consent to be bound by the terms and conditions of the
-1-
scs65~
Original Agreement, and has satisfied the requirements of Section
VIII.A.(2) of the Original Agreement.
4. The FWS, the County, the Cities and the JPA desire
to amend the Original Agreement to add the CITY OF CORONA as a
party.
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as
follows:
1. The first paragraph of the Original Agreement is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"THIS IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT is made
and entered into this 1st day of August,
1990, by and among the UNITED STATES FISH &
WILDLIFE SERVICE ("the FWS"), THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the
State of California ("the County"), THE
CITIES OF PERRIS, LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE,
MORENO VALLEY, HEMET, TEMECULA, and CORONA,
all municipal corporations of the State of
California, ("the Cities"), and THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY, a public
agency ("the JPA")."
2. SECTION VIII.B of the Original Agreement is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"B. Notices. Notices provided for
shall be delivered to the persons set forth
-2-
SCS6576
below or shall be deemed given twenty (20)
days after deposit in the United States mail,
certified and postage prepaid, return receipt
requested and addressed as follows or at such
other further address which any party hereto
may from time to time give notice to the
other parties.
CITY OF CORONA
Attention: City Manager
815 W. Sixth Street
Corona, California
CITY OF HEMET
Attention: City Manager
450 East Latham
Hemet, California
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Attention: City Manager
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
Attention: City Manager
23119 Cottonwood, Bldg. C
Moreno Valley, California
CITY OF PERRIS
Attention: City Manager
101 North "D" Street
Perris, California
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Attention: City Manager
3900 Main Street
Riverside, California
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, California 92390
SCS6576
-3-
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Attention: Planning Director
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
Attention: Brian Loew
4080 Lemon St., 12th Floor
Riverside, California
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Attention: Brooks Harper
24000 Avila Road
Laguna Niguel, California 92656
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Attention: Peter Stine
2140 Eastman Ave., Suite 100
Ventura, California 93003"
3. This Second Amendment shall take effect upon both
its execution by all of the parties and the recordation by the
executive officer of the Riverside County Local Agency Formation
Agency of a certificate of completion on Annexation
No. 72 to the City of Corona in substantially the same form as
the application for that Annexation stood amended on January 1,
1991. This Second Amendment shall continue in force for the
duration of the Original Agreement.
4. The terms and conditions of the Original Agreement
not expressly amended by this Second Amendment shall continue in
full force and effect.
SCS6576
-4-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Second
Amendment as of the date last set forth below and agree to abide
by its terms from that date forward.
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORONA
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF HEMET
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
City Clerk Mayor
SCS6576
-5-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
-6-
scs6576
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
scs6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
-6-
SCS6576
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATE8 FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
-6-
-- SCS6576
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
THE UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE
By:
SCS6576
-6-
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING
CONTRIBUTIONS TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY
HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING
CONTRIBUTIONS TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
("MOU") is made by and among the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the
"County"), and the CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY,
PERRIS, RIVERSIDE, TEMECULA and CORONA ("Cities").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County and the CITES OF HEMET, LAKE
ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE and TEMECULA have
entered into that certain agreement entitled "JOINT EXERCISE OF
POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION
AGENCY" ("JPA");
WHEREAS, Section 3.5 of the JPA provides that in
connection with the admission of an additional public agency, the
prospective member and the existing members shall execute a
memorandum of understanding specifying the obligations of the
prospective member for contributions for past or present Agency
expenditures and assets;
WHEREAS, Section 3.10, "Contributions/Estimated Budget"
of the JPA specifies the obligations of members for
contributions;
SCS4976
-1-
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. THE CITY OF CORONA shall be fully bound by the
provisions of the JPA, specifically including, but not limited
to, the provisions of Section 3.10 Contributions/Estimated
Budget on the same basis as the existing members.
2. This MOU shall take effect upon both its execution
by all of the parties and the recordation by the executive
officer of the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission
of a certificate of completion on Ammexation No. 72 to the City
of Corona in substantially the same form as the application for
that Annexation stood amended on January 1, 1991. This MOU shall
continue in force for the duration of the JPA.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this MOU
as of the dates set forth below.
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORONA
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF HEMET
By:
City Clerk Mayor
SOS&976
-2-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
SCS4976
-3-
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
SOS4976
-3-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
SCS4976
-3-
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRI8
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
-3-
SCS4976
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
-3-
SCS49~6
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
SCS4976
-3-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
SCS~976
-3-
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
-3-
SCS4976
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
SCS4976
-3-
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
THIRD AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE
OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING RIVERSIDE
COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
This THIRD AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT CREATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
("Second Amendment") is made by and between THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF HEMET, THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, THE CITY OF PERRIS, THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, and THE CITY OF CORONA.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF HEMET,
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, THE CITY OF
PERRIS and THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, ("original member agencies")
entered into that certain agreement entitled JOINT EXERCISE OF
POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION
AGENCY ("Original Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE OF
POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION
AGENCY made THE CITY OF TEMECULA a party to the original
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the CITY OF CORONA has executed a MEMORANDUM
OF UNDERSTANDING specifying the obligations of the CITY OF CORONA
for contributions toward Agency expenditures and assets, as
SCS6573
-1-
provided in Section 3.5 "Additional Members" of the Original
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the original member agencies, the CITY OF
TEMECULA, and THE CITY OF CORONA desire to amend the Original
Agreement to add the CITY OF CORONA as a member agency;
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Section 1, "PARTIES AND DATE" of the Original
Agreement is amended to read as follows:
"1. PARTIES.
This Agreement is made by and between
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF HEMET,
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, THE CITY OF PERRIS, THE CITY OF
RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA, and THE
CITY OF CORONA hereinafter collectively
called the "Member Agencies" for the
acquisition, administration, operation and
maintenance of land and facilities for
ecosystem conservation and habitat reserves
for the Stephens' kangaroo rat and other
listed or candidate threatened or endangered
species."
II. The terms and conditions of the Original Agreement
not expressly amended by this Third Amendment continue in full
force and effect.
SCS6573
-2-
III. This Third Amendment shall become effective upon
both its execution by all of the parties and the recordation by
the executive officer of the Riverside County Local Agency
Formation Commission of a certificate of completion on Annexation
No. 72 to the City of Corona in substantially the same form as
the application for that application stood amended on January 1,
1991.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Third Amendment as of the date last set forth below and agree to
abide by its terms from this date forward.
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORONA
By:
City Clerk Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF HEMET
By:
City Clerk Mayor
SCS6573
-3-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
-4-
SCS6573
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SCS6573
-4-
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
-4-
SCS65T'5
ITEM 6
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
September 10, 1991
Authorize Reduction in Security Amounts for
Parcel Map No. 22610
PREPARED BY:
Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
R ECOMMEN DAT ION:
That the City Council ACKNOWLEDGE the completion of street improvements in
Parcel Map No. 22610; AUTHORIZE the reduction in street Faithful Performance
Security amount; APPROVE the Subdivision Agreement Rider; ACCEPT the Faithful
Performance Trust Deposit in the reduced amount; and DIRECT the City Clerk to so
notify the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
DISCUSSION:
The County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, acting on behalf of the Board of
Supervisors, approved the Map for Parcel Map No. 22610 on February 25, 1988 and
accepted the Subdivision Agreement submitted by
Rudy S. Berry
41837 Calle Cedral
Temecula, CA 92592
for the improvement of streets. Accompanying the Subdivision Agreement were
Letters of Credit issued by
American National Bank
CITYENG\PM22610.STF\ks 1
as fol lows:
Letter of Credit No. ANB-(2)89-23-2 in the amount of $8,500.00 to
cover street improvements.
Letter of Credit No. ANB-(1 )8912312 in the amount of $4,250.00 to
cover material and labor.
The following item has been completed by the developer in accordance with the
approved plans:
Required Street Improvements.
As a Schedule "H" Parcel Map division where the streets are not to be
accepted for maintenance by the County (City), the construction of
streets may be limited to 24 feet width of base material on 32 feet width
of graded roadway section. Three fronting streets were included in the
Conditions of Approval: Calle Cedral, Green Tree Road, and Pauba
Road. The Road Commissioner's office deleted the requirements for
Green Tree Road as the existing asphalt paved roadway was superior
to the proposed base material on graded roadway section, and for Pauba
Road as Assessment District No. 159 proposed improvements also
exceeded the proposed base material on graded roadway section. Calle
Cedral was constructed to the minimal section and satisfies the
conditions for a non-maintained road.
The inspection and verification process relating to the above item has been completed
by the County of Riverside Road Department and City Staff, and the Department of
Public Works recommends the reduction of the Faithful Performance Security amount.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce this Security amount as follows:
Streets $ 7,650.00
The remainin9 10% of the original Faithful Performance Security amount is to be
retained for one (1) year guarantee period as follows:
Streets $ 850.00
The developer has submitted a cash deposit with the City of Temecula in the amount
of $8.50.00. City Council acceptance of this cash deposit will permit the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit for this
item of work. The Material and Labor Letter of Credit will remain in effect pending
City Council exoneration.
AC:ks
Attachments:
Vicinity Map
Subdivision Agreement
C I TYENG\PH22610. STF\ks 2
AGREEMENT REGARDING
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the
CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called "CITY", and ~"~t~'~' ~_'~
hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside and CONTRACTOR
have entered into a series of agreements and CONTRACTOR has
submitted a series of bonds in connectio with consideration by the
County of Riverside of final map approval ~r~r: ,'~ _ '~f~ N~ ;L~4~l~
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula incorporated on
December 1, 1989;
WHEREAS, in order to expeditiously process the
acceptance of improvements pursuant to the final map, the CITY has
permitted subdividers to use the existing County Subdivision
Agreement and Bond forms in lieu of CITY forms;
WHEREAS, certain references in the County forms
incorrectly refer to County positions instead of City positions;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between CiTY and
CONTRACTOR as follows:
1. All references to the "County of Riverside"
contained in of the documents between CITY and CONTRACTOR
concerning ~Faet-~.-~t\~'~.1~,~t~are now defined as referring to the
"City of Temecula".
2. All references to the "Riverside County Road
Commissioner" contained in any docum_~:~ts between CiTY and
CONTRACTOR concerning T-~L-alt~)~,~ ~f)~ ~.,~are now hereby defined
to refer to the "City Engineer".
3. All references to any other Riverside County offices
or position.~ contained in the Agreements or Bonds concerning ~
~/:~(~, ~xl'~f' -J:L~c now hereby refer to th: uw:lent CI Y
or positions.
NT ' NA,h~jE'
CTOR S
Dated: ~ -- ~ ~ ~ By: ~Q~ ~~
( Print Signatore's Name)
CITY OF TEMECULA
Dated:
RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR
Dated:
JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
z
SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ x :- t' ' SS.
COUNTY OF
~_/')
On / -- . before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
personally know"h to me, or proved to me on the basis of satis-
factory evidence. to be the person(s) whose name(s)
(is/are) subscribed to the within instrument. and acknowledged
that ;~. ( (he/she/they) executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
1
Notsry's Signatu~
OFFICIAL SEA
MARY JO SEE'RY
NOTART PUBLIC-CALlicORNIA
PRINCIPAL C FIC~, IN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
rOjq Nt::]ITAj:i~ SEAL OR ST/~MP
ITEM
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
September 10, 1991
SUBJECT:
Final Parcel Map No. 23335
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council APPROVE Final Parcel Map No. 23335 subject to the Conditions
of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335, Amended No. I was approved by the Riverside
County Planning Commission on August 3, 1988, and the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on October 4, 1988. The City Council approved the First Extension of
Time on March 26, 1991.
Parcel Map No. 23335 is a six (6) lot commercial subdivision of 10.18 acres. The
Parcel Map is located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road and is
part of Zone Change No. 5163. The applicant is Bedford Properties.
The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Parcel Map No. 23335:
* Area Drainage Fees (Deferred to Building Permits)
* Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees (Deferred to Building Permits)
* Stephen's K-Rat Fees (at Grading Permits)
$5,841.33
$14,255.00
$19,851.00
A:FPM23335 1
The following bonds have been paid for Final Parcel Map No. 23335:
Faithful Labor and
Performance Materials
Streets & Drainage N/A -o
Water N/A -o
Sewer N/A -o
Survey Monuments $ 2,904.00 $ 0.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not determined.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Final Tract Map No. 23335 subject
to the Conditions of Approval.
BY:ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Development Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Planning Department Staff Report
dated March 26, 1991
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Staff Report
dated February 25, 1991
Planning Commission
dated February 25, 1991
Action of City Council to
Approve Resolution
A:FPM23335 2
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 23335
DATE: August 30. 1991
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Streets and Drainage $ '-
Water $ '-
Sewer $ '-
TOTAL $ N/A
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ --
$ --
$ --
$ N/A
*Maintenance Retention (10% for one year)
*(or Bonds if work is completed)
$ N/A
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee- SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
Planning Fee
Quimby Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
Fee Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
2,904.00
-0-
5.841.33
14,255.00
-0-
-0-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
106.00
-0-
8.00
850.00
-0-
651.76
1,615.76
-0-
SANDEFKM\FORMS\FEESECUR.ENG 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Final Parcel Map No. 23335
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
( Quimby )
Public Facility
( Traffic Mitigation )
Public Facility
( Traffic Signal Mitigation )
Public Facility
( Library )
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 1
N/A
Condition No. 16
Condition No. 12
N/A
Letter Dated 6-13-88
Letter Dated 6-22-88
A:FPM23335
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
March 26, 1991
First Extension of Time
Tentative Parcel Map 23335
~REPARED BY:
Richard Ayala
RECOMMENDAT ION:
ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First Extension of
Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 based on the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Bedford Properties
REPRESENTATIVE:
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
PROPOSAL:
Six (6) commercial lot subdivision of 10.18 acres.
First Extension of Time
LOCA T I ON:
North of Junction of Winchester Road and Ynez
Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
C-P-S I Scenic Highway Commercial )
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: I - P
South: C-P-S
East: C - P-S
West: C-P-S
I Industrial Park )
| Scenic Highway
Commercial )
( Scenic Highway
Commercial )
( Scenic Highway
Commercial )
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested
ST A F F R PT\T PM23335 I
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Vacant
North: Industrial Park
South: Commercial
East: Vacant
West: Commercial
Total Acreage: 10.18
No. of Lots: 6
First Extension of Time application for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 23335 was submitted to the City on
September 18, 1990. On February 25, 1991, it was
presented to the City of Temecula Planning
Commission and was approved by a ~-0 vote based
on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff
Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval. The property is located north of the
junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. At
present. the subject site is vacant and graded land.
Westerly of the property, there is an office
building, a CarPs Jr., and graded land· The
subject site is currently zoned C-P-S {Scenic
Highway Commercial ).
Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First
Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map
No. 23335 based on the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report and subject to
the attached Conditions of Approval.
· RA:ks
Attachment:
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Staff Report
dated February 25, 1991
Development Fee Checklist
Planning Commission Minutes
dated February 25, 1991
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 2
-- RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335 A SIX
PARCEL COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION OF 10.18 ACRES
LOCATED NORTH OF JUNCTION OF WINCHESTER ROAD
AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 910-011-031 PORTION.
WHEREAS, Bedford Properties Inc. filed the Time Extension in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Time Extension application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extension on
February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approved said Time Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
· SECTION 1. Findinqs. That theTemeculaPlanningCommission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty ~30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
~1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
| 2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
a) There is a reasonable probability that the
Time Extension proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 1
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Time Extension is consistent with the SWAP
and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approvin9 projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that the Time
Extension proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. ( 1 ) Pursuant to Section 18.30( c), no Time Extension may
be approved unless the followin9 findings can be made:
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 2
a)
The proposed use must conform to all the
General Plan requirements and with all
applicable requirements of state law and City
ordinances.
b)
The proposed subdivision does not affect the
general health, safety, and welfare of the
public.
12) The Plannin9 Commission, in approvingthe proposed
Time Extension, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will be
consistent with the City's future General
Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law, due to
the fact that the project is consistent with
existing site development standards in that it
proposes articulated design features and site
amenities commensurate with existing and
anticipated commercial development
standards.
b)
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted general plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with
existing and anticipated land use and design
guidelines standards.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with
state planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use conforms with
those uses listed as "allowed" within the
project site's existing C-P-S ( Scenic Highway
Commercial ) land use designation.
d)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the
fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed facility structures; adequate
landscaping will be provided along the
project's public and private frontages; and
the internal circulation plan should not create
traffic conflicts as design provisions will be
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 3
in conformance with adopted City standards.
e)
f)
g)
h)
The project, as designed and conditioned.
will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions
stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 is compatible
with surrounding land uses. The density
creates a compatible physical relationship
with adjoining properties, due to the fact
that the proposal is similar in compatibility
with surrounding land uses; and has
adequate area in order to provide for siting
of proposed development.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed project is consistent
with the current zoning of the subject site
{ C-P-S; Scenic Highway Commercial ) and also
consistent with the adopted Southwest Area
Community Plan { SWAP ) designation of
Commercial.
The project, as designed and conditioned,
will not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Negative
Declaration adopted by the County for the
project, due to the fact that impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project's
Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the project will propose independent
access points from Winchester Road and
Possibly Ynez Road which have been
determined to be adequate by the City
Engineer.
S~ ~,FFRPT\TPM23335 4
The desi9n of the subdivision and the type of
improvements are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to
the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and the project analysis.
k)
That said findings are supported by minutes.
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECT ION 2, the Time Extension
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that
the previous environmental determination {Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 32718) still applies to said Parcel Map {Extension of
Time).
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves The
First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 for a six (6) parcel
Commercial Subdivision of 10.18 located north of junction of Winchester Road and
Ynez Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-011-031 Portion subject to the
fol Iowi ng conditions:
Resolution.
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION ~. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption
of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of February, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
STAFF R PT\T PM23335 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
2R
2356
10
1621
PP
PP2
23335
J
VICINITY MAP
r
CASE NO.
P.C. DATE
J
CITY OF TEMECULA
t,,,,- Sc
c"' 4' ;,7
I
'CZ08
CZ4348 \
,, / ~ -sc
>
A- I-I0 I/ CZ 4607
/
'~Z 077C 4
CZ ~566
M-SC(
I-P
CZ 4078
~ M-SC
'R R,
._._,,._---'-'
~: ~f CASE NO.
!:'.~ ~ ZONE MAP ) P.C. DATE 2-,~~'''~/
CITY OF TEMECULA
LI .v,,. .
· 2'/'
J
SWAP MAP
CASE NO. ,/~vf ~:]5'3 _,
P.C. DATE ~-z~'- ~/)t
Tentative Parcel
County. of' Rlvlrslde,.
WincheSter
Map Nc
SUte Of Californiu
Meadows
23335
T '
~ HEREBY CERTIFY that the forecJoin9 Resolution was duly adopted by
the Plannin9 Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meetin9 thereof, held
on the 25th day of February, 1991 by the followin9 vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 6
--- ATTACHMENT II
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
P!anninq Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
Prior to any construction on the area shown as remainder, the applicant shall
file for a Certificate of Compliance with the Planning Department.
This conditionally approved extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map No.
23335 will expire one year after the original expiration date, unless extended
as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is October q, 1991.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~60.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 9
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
CalTrans.
Prior to recordation of the final map. the developer shall provide evidence
that Assessment District 161 will construct the improvements on Winchester
Road, in accordance with County Standard 100, Section A ( 110~113~~ ).
In the event that the Assessment District 161 will not construct the
improvements, the developer shall be required to construct or bond for the
required improvements.
Sufficient right-of-way along Winchester Road shall be confirmed to exist or
conveyed for public use to provide for a public street for public use to
provide for a 67 foot half width right-of-way.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
10.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCSR's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCF, R~s shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CCF, R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CCF, R's shall be prepared at the developer~s sole cost and expense.
The CCF, R~s shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
Ce
The CCF, R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 10
d,
The CCF, R~s shall provide for the effective establishment, operation.
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CCF, R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCF, R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCF-R~s, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CCF, R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements
ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads.
drives or parking areas shall be provided by CCF, R's or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the
issuance of building permit where no map is involved.
11. County Road Condition Number lq shall be deleted.
12.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
13.
The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the
area within the 100-year floodplain.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
15.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter. A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 11
16.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees ) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation En.qineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
17.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road and
Ynez Road, and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
18.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact CalTrans and City
Transportation Engineering for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
19.
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engine~er for any street closure and detour
or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
20.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
21o
All Conditions of Approval stated in the County Road Department letter dated
June 23, 1988 shall still apply to this project.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 12
DATE
October 4, 1988
"' :IiVE:I])iDE CO UnCu
II
PLAntlinG DEPA:IC!TIEnC
TO:
Surveyor
Road
Building & Safety
Flood Control
Heal th
Ft re Protection
TENTATIVE ;/PARCEL NAP NO. ~
T
r~lV~.H~l -"' u., REGIONAL O, One
The Rheaside County E] Planning Director/~Board of Supervisors has taken the following
action on the above referenced tentative map:
xx APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions (no waiver requ(st submitted),
__DENIED tentative map based on the,attached findings,
APPROVED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for waiver
of the final map.
APPROVED tentative map and APPROVED request for waiver of the final map.
APPROVED ~ Exten;ton of Time to
al 1 previously app~Ved.-cen,d.t,.t't;ons.
APPROVED :~ Extension :Of Time to . ~ k .
DENIED Extension of T-:ime~':. <.~/,:-:' ", --T; ',
.... f';, - ': I.., / I 1. I; .',' i !.l I:' :"' ';' f' ~''''
APPROVED withdrawal of ~eh!a~tve map; .......................
APPROVED Minor Change to revise originally approved conditions as sho~n (attached),
APPROVED Minor Change to revtse'6~'i'gtnally approved map (attached).
subject to
subject to
. DENIED request for Minor Change.
· . APPROVED Minor Change to waive the final map.
Ver7 truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLAHNING DEPARTHENT
Roger S, Streeter, Planning Director
R~chard J.~';cHott, Su.~erv~s~ng Planner
SURVEYOR -WHITE ROAD - BLUE
,~z~e,-. ,/u~ HEALTH - PiNK
4080 LEMON STREET, gin FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
BUILDING & SAFETY - GREEN
FiRE PROTECTION - GOLDENROD
FLOOD- CANARY
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM
INDIO, CALIFORNIA ~:
(619) 342-~:?
INKS
T~,RM:rs
8-9-88
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: The Planning Department SUBMillALDATE: ' '
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE 5163 TENTATIVE COtltlERCIAL PARCEL ,'lAP ~
· <LL~':
NO. 23335 -RANCHO CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT COfIPANY - First Supervisorial
District -Rancho California Area - lO.18 Acres - 6 Lots - Schedule E - REQUEST:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Change of Zoning from R-R to C-1/C-P.
THE PLANN I NG CO~MI SS I ON RECOMMENDS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment
No. 32718 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not
have a significant effect on the environment; and
DENIAL of Change of Zone No. 5163 from R-R to C-1/C-P in accordance
with Exhibit 2, based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planning Commission minutes dated August 3, 1988; but,
APPROVAL of Change of Zone No. 5163 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance
with Exhibit 4, based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planning Commission minutes dated August 3, 1988; and
APPROVAL of Tentative Commercial Parcel Map No. 23335 subject to the
attached conditions, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the P~anning Connission minutes dated August 3, 1988.
P'r~,,' A-- reJ Depfi Comments Di_~, AGENDA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1988
(AGENDA ITEH 3-1 - REEL 995, SIDE 1 - TAPE 1, SIDE 2)
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 5163 - EA 32718 - Rancho California Development Company -
Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - 10.16± acres, north of
Junction of Winchester Rd and Ynez Rd - R-R to C-l/C-P, etc.
PARCEL NAP 23335 ANENDED NO. I - EA 32718 - Rancho California Development
Company - Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - north of
Junction of Winchester Rd and Ynez Rd - 6 lots - 10.18± acres - Schedule E
The hearings were opened at 11:11 a.m. and closed at 11:21 a.m.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the negative declaration for EA 32718,
denial of Change of Zone Case 5163 from R-R to C-l/C-P, approval of Change of
Zone Case 5163 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance i
w th Exhibit 4, and approval of
Parcel ~p 23335 Amended No. 1. Staff had originally recommended approval of
the C-1/C-P zone as requested, as they felt a commercial use would be compat-
ible with surrounding development which included vacant lands, single family
residences, a. pasture and dairy, and c~nmerctal uses. However, after a
further review, they had determined that the C-P-S zone would be more
appropriate as it would protect Winchester Road from outdoor advertising.
Robert Kimble, representing the applicant, requested approval of the C-1/C-P
zone as it would provide more flexibility in selecting future uses. In answer
to a question by Commissioner Donahoe, Nr. Kimble advised they did not have
any. proposed uses at the present time.
Mr. Kimble requested deletion of Road Department Condition 14 which restricted
access on Nargarita Road; this had been a condition of their original map
submittal and the area covered by the map had been reduced so that they no
longer had frontage on Margarita Road. Ns. Johnson agreed to the deletion of
d
Con ition 14. Nr. Kimble then requested that Conditions 2 through 5 of the
Flood Control District's conditions be deleted and replaced with conditions
which he had submitted to the District; he read these conditions into the
record at that time. (The conditions related to the construction of
facilities required as part of the Hurrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area
Drainage Plan). Ed Lotz of the Flood Control District advised Mr. Kashuba had
been required to leave the meeting; however, Mr. Kashuba had discussed the
appltcant's proposal with Flood Control staff and they did not endorse the
proposed changes. Mr. Lotz requested that the Flood Control conditions be
retained as originally presented.
Commissioner Bresson asked about access; there was an access opening on
Winchester between Lots 3 and 4, and he wanted to know how Lots 2 and 5 would
receive access. Mr. Johnson explained State Highway 79 (Winchester Road) in
this area was a six lane divided highway and had a greater access restriction
than the Count's lesser road system. Road Department Condition 16 required a
businessman's association to provide for reciprocal parking and legal access.
Mr. ICIotz asked whether a businessman's association was needed for any other
reason; when informed there was no other purpose for the association, Mr.
Klotz advised a businessman's association was not necessary as the reciprocal
parking and )Ccess could be accomplished_through CC&R r~quir___~_e__n~s. He
11
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1988
furnished wording to replace Road Department Condition 16 as currently
written.
There was no further testimony, and the hearing was closed at 11:21 a.m.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant is proposing to change the zoning on
10.18 acres in the Rancho California area from R-R to C-1/C-P and subdivide
the parcels into 6 lots; surrounding zoning includes M-SC, I-P, R-R, R-5, R-3,
R-4, A-2-20, R-2 and C-P-S; the subject site is currently vacant; surrounding
land uses include graded and vacant land, single family residences under
construction, a pasture and dairy, and commercial uses along 1-15; the project
site lies within Planning Area "F' of the Rancho Villages Policy Plan on the
Open Space and Conservation Map of the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan; Planning Area 'F" is designated for con~ercial land uses along
Winchester and east of 1-15 in the Rancho Villages Policy Plan; environmental
concerns include liquefaction, groundshaking, flooding, noise, possible
impacts to agriculture, energy resources, scenic highways and paleontological
resources but these concerns, with the exception of the impact on scenic
highways, can be mitigated through conformance with the conditions of
ap roval; the impact on scenic highways can be mitigated by approval of the
C-~-S zone. The proposed C-1/C-P would allow outdoor advertising and would
therefore not protect the scenic qualities of Winchester Road. The
recommended C-P-S zone and Parcel Map 23335 A~ended No. I would be more
consistent with the adjacent C-P-S zoning, would protect the scenic qualities
of Winchester Road, would be consistent with the Rancho Villages Policy Plan
and the. Comprehensive General Plan; compatible with area zoning and develop-
ment; consistent With the applicable provisions of Ordinances 348 and 460; and
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Commissioner
Purviance and unanimously carried, the Commission recommended to the Board of
Supervisors adoption of the negative declaration for EA 32718, a royal of
Change of lone Case 5163 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance with Ex~Vbtt 4, and
approval of Parcel Map 23335 Amended No. 1 subject to the proposed conditions,
with the Road Department conditions amended as follows, based on the above
findings and conclusions and the recommendations of staff.
14.' Delete Entirely
16. Delete as currently written and replace with the following: P tor to
the ecordatton of the final map or .-ny phase thereof, the applicant
sh,l~ record Cr~R~ providing for reciprocal parktnq and leqal accesS.
ROLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLOWS:
AYES: Commissioners Bresson, Smith, Beadling, Purrlance and Donahoe
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
12
PINKS '
Zoning Area: Rancho California
First Su ervisorial District
E.A. Number 32718
Regional Team No. I
CO~(ERCIAL PARCEL ~ MO. 23335
AMENDED MO. 1
CHANGE OF ZONE ~0. 5163
Planning Commission: 8-03-88
Agenda Item No. 3-1
Z
RIVERSIDE COUMTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
S'rAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2. Engineer/Rep.:
3. Type of Roquest:
4. Location:
5. Existing Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
g. Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
10. Land Division Data:
11. Agency Reco~Xnendations:
12. Letters:
13. Sphere of Influence:
ANALYSIS:
Rancho California Development Co.-
Robert Betn, William Frost and Assoc.
To change the zoning from R-R to C-1/C-P
and subdivide 10.18 acres into 6 lots.
North of Junction of Winchester Road and
Ynez Road
R-R
R-2, C-P-S, C-l/C-P, M-SC, R-R, I-P,
R-5, R-3, R-4, and A-2-20
Currently fiat and vacant. It is
covered by dry grass and brush and
scattered trees.
Vacant and graded land, substations, a
dairy, single family residential under
construction and commercial buildings.
Land Use: Rancho Villages
Total Acreage: 10.18
Total Lots: 6
See letters dated:
Road: 6-23-BB
Heal th: 6-16-88
F1 ood: 6-22-88
Ft re: 6-13-BB
Bldg & Safety {grading): 6-1048
Mt. Palomar: 4-26-88
NOpposin/Supporting: None received
ot within a City Sphere
Project Description
zoning on 10.18 acres in the Rancho California zoning area from
Residential) to C-1/C-P {General Commercial} and subdivide the propert into 6
schedule 'E' lots. The property is located North of the ]unction of W~nchester
Road and Ynez Road.
CORqERCIAL PARCEL RAP RO. 23335
AMERDEDRO. 1
CHANGE OF ZONE I10. 5163
Staff Report
Page 2
Land Use and Zonlng
At present, the subject site is vacant. Surrounding land uses include
rimarily vacant and graded land with a pasture and a dairy located
Eoutheasterly of the project site. Westerly of the pro erty, there is an
office Building, a Carl's Jr. and graded land. A commercial center is located
across 1-15 to the west. The subject site is currently zoned R-R. Surrounding
zoning includes M-SC, I-P and R-R to the north, R-5, R-3 and R-4 located
Northeasterly of the project, R-R, A-2-20 and R-2 located Southeasterly of the
site. To the west, and across 1-15 there is C-P-S, C-1/C-P and H-SC.
Environmental Assessment
Environmental Assessment No. 32718 indicated that liquefaction, groundshaking,
flooding, and possible noise, impact the site. Development of the property
could also impac~ agriculture, energy resources, scenic highways and potential
paleontological resources.
County Geologic Report No. 509 has been prepared for the site and has been
approved by the County Geologist. Nitigation for liquefaction will be
implemented through the conditions of approval. Groundshaking will be
mitigated through adherence to the Uniform Building Code Standards. Flooding
hazards will be mitigated through Flood Control's conditions of approval. All
noise impacts will be mitigated through proper building design and Uniform
Building Code regulations. The subject site is not currently being used for
Report was prepared and no significant impact on wildlife was found.
The project site is mapped as having a potential for thermal waters beneath its
surface, however at the present time there is no economically feasible way to
harness this energy resource, therefore mitigation is not possible at this
time. Landscape plans will be required prior to the issuance of building
permits in order to maintain the freeway's and highway's aesthetic view. An
archaeological report was prepared for the site and no significant artifacts
were found. A qualified paleontologist will be required to be on site during
grading.
General Plan
The project site lles within the Rancho Villages Policy Plan on the Open Space
and Conservation Hap in the Comprehensive General Plan. More specifically, the
subject site falls within Planning Area 'F" of the Rancho Villages Polic Plan.
Planning Area "F" is designated for a combination of industrial, commercial and
residential uses. Industrial and commercial uses, more commonly called
"Employment Center East", which are located north of Winchester Road will take
COme4ERCIAL PARCEL RAP I10. 13335
MMERDED RO. 1
CHANGE OF ZOME RO. 5163
Staff Report
Page 3
advantage of the immediate freeway access and Winchester Road. Since the
proposed project is located northwesterly of Winchester and Easterly of 1-15
and falls within the allowable commercial acreage called forth for Plannin
Area 'F', it is consistent with the Rancho Villages Conmnunity Policy Plan an3
Comprehensive General Plan.
FINDINGS:
The applicant is proposing to change the zoning on 10.18 acres in the
Rancho California area from R-R to C-1/C-P and subdivide the parcels into 6
lots.
2. The subject site is currently zoned R-R. Surrounding zoning includes H-SC,
I-P, R-R, R-5, R-3, R-4, A-2-20, R-2, and C-P-S.
The subject site is currently vacant. Surrounding land uses include graded
and vacant land, single family residences under construction, a pasture and
a dairy and c_o~nmercial uses along 1-15.
The project site lies within Planning Area "F" of the Rancho Villages
Policy Plan on the Open Space and Conservation Hap of the Riverside County
· Comprehensive..General Plan.
Planning Area "F" is designated for c~nmercial land uses along Winchester
and East of 1-15 in the Rancho Villages Policy Plan.
Environmental concerns include liquefaction, groundshaking, flooding,
noise, possible impacts to agriculture, energy resources, scenic highways,
and paleontological resources. The concerns can be mitigated through
conformance with the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed zone change and subdivision are consistent with the Rancho
Villages Policy Plan and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
2. The proposed zone change and subdivision are compatible with area zoning
and development.
3. The proposed zone change and subdivision are consistent with the applicable
provision of Ordinance 348 and Ordinance 460.
4. The proposed zone change and subdivision will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
COI~ERCIAL PARCEL MAP RO. 23335
AMENDED RO. 1
CHANGE OF ZONE RO. 5163
Staff Report
Page 4
RECOHHENDATZONS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32718
based on the findings that the project will not have a significant effect on
the environment; and,
APPROVAL of lie OF ZONE I10. 5163 from R-R to C-1/C-P in accordance with
~Xnlblt Z; and
APPROVAL of COIIERCIAL PARCEL RAP I10. 23335, AMEMDED RO. I subject to the
attached conditions, and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in
this staff report.
GM:sc
7/25/88
r
CZ 51G~/PM 23~:55 "'LAND USE
' ' -,/7'~./':
!----/ ,. / /
.' ' ~ I ~V.J/~
-ij<~ , ~' ""'
GRADED
,~ VAO.
OF.FlOE II,B~
VAC.
~ /...
App. RANCHO CALIR DEV. CO.
Use R-R 10 C-IIC-P
Are 1t0, CALl E Sup. I)bt.
s-. t · s.,,. aw. ,,,,,,,', e~. |~ ~.
Ckc~lafion WINCHESTER RD. URBAN ART, 134'
Elemefd ~ FREEWAY VARIABLE
t
MIll
:R-R
PROPOSED ZONING
RllllR
- R-4
C-P-S
R81~R
C-P-$
A-2-
r
, 'P C-P-: R-2
'App. RANCHO CALIF. DEV. CO. ""
Use R - R ~ C-I/C-P -
~eo ~, CALIR " Sup.~st. I
~ s.. T. 7 s.,e. ~w. k,,,,.', ek~ i~ ~. ~ ~= "
Ckculotion WINCHESTER RD UR~N ART,
[~ent ~ FREEWAY VARIAB~
Ca. Ok. ~ 55C ~fe 7/6/88 bown By jcw//,
Tentative Parcel
County of Riverside,.
Winchester
Map No.
State of California
Meadows
23335
Amended Mop No I
/
/ /
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE COIiI[RCIAL PARCEL leAP NO 23335°
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action,
or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers,
or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the
County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning CO!~MERCIAL TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 23335, AND. #l,
which action is brought within the time period provided for in
California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside
will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in
the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of
any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside.
2. The tentative/~arcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance
460, Schedul, E unless modified by the conditions listed below. This
approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of
Supervisors approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
3. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or
licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of
California Subdivision Nap Act, Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance
460.
4. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and
shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons
such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as
approved by the County Road Conm~issioner. Street names shall be subject
to approval of the Road Commissioner.
5. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for
nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of
dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed
by the Riverside County Surveyor.
6. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the
parcel map boundary to a County maintained road.
7. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 23335
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
8. Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be
submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety.
9. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement reconm~endations
outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated June 23, 1988, a
copy of which is attached.
lO. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health
recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal
dated june 16, 1988, a copy of which is attached.
ll. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control reconmnendations
outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
june 22, 1988, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies
within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25
of Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for
the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
Road Con~issi~ner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of
parcel map.
12. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
· outlined in :the County Fire Department's letter dated june 13, 1988, a
copy of which is attached.
13. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated June
lO, 1988, a copy of which is attached.
14. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations dated April 26, 1988, a
copy of which is attached.
15. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
County Geologic Report No. 509 and the County Geologist letter dated
july 13, 1988, a copy of which is attached.
TENTATZVE PARCEL MAP N0.23335, At!:). tl
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
GRADXNG:
16. Grading plans shall conform to the Hillside Development Standards as
presented in the Comprehensive General Plan. All cut and/or fill
slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in
vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a
special terracing (benching) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1),
retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All
driveways shall not exceed a 15% grade.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
17. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in coqformance with the
development standards of the C-1/C-P zone.
18. All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of O.B
acres gross.
19. When lots a~ crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall
have a net usable area of not less than 3600 square feet, exclusive of
the utility easement.
20.' All' lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.BC
of Ordinance 460.
21. Corner lots shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section
3.8B of Ordinance 460.
22. Prior to recordation of the final map the land divider shall execute a
certificate of noncontiguous ownership.
23. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for
~lan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan.
24. Prior to the recordation of the Final Nap, the following conditions
shall be complied with:
ae
Change of Zone ~of) 5163 shall be adopted by the Board of
Supervisors. ~ I~i)
A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be
transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
TENTATZVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23335 All).
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
ENVIROk~NTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS:
25. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be
permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the
recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to
the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following
note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"County Archaeological Report No. 1217 was prepared for this
property on Narch 30, 1988 by Christopher E. Drover PhD, and is
on file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
"County Biological Report No. 212 was prepared for this property
in May 1988 by the Planning Center, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Department.
"County Geological Report No. 509 was prepared for this property
in Nay, 1988 by Leighton and Associates, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern
in the report are liquefaction hazards.
25. The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor. These constraints affect all parcels."
GM:aea
7-27-88
i'L .......Ir ......................i'll .............] .............................iii ...........~'1 ~ 1"'~ ......................Ii'
LeRoy D. Smoot
ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
OFFICE OF ROAD CO~4.41S.~IO.%'ER 6 COL'NTY St RVEYOR
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
June 23, 1988
MiVIII~IiDIE:. CA~IKO~NI A 12902
Tl~-llmNONl (7t4) ?l?-Ill4
Re:. Parcel Nap 23335 - Amend
Schedule E - Team 1
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street Improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It Is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate Q's,.and that their mission or unacceptabtltty may require the map
to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are Intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road
Commisstoner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map
and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Parcel MAp 23335 - Amend #1
· Jun~ 23, 1988
Page 2
~Jor drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall comply with the Caltrans reconnendations as
outlined in their letter dated Hatch 2, 1988 (a copy of which is
attached), prior to the recordatton of the final map.
A copy of the final map shall be submitted to Caltrans, District 08,
Post Office Box 231, San Bernardino, California 92403; Attention:
Project Development for review and approval prior to recordation.
Ynez Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 38
feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; recon-
struction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the
Road Commissioner within a 50 foot half width dedicated right of way
tn accordance with County Standard No. 101.
All-driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
Winchester Road including R.C.W.D. lots fronttng Winchester Road
shall-be Improved with concrete curb and gutter located 55 feet from
centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction or
resurfacing of existing paving as determined by Caltrans within a
67 foot half width dedicated right of way.
Prior' to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road department, a cash sum of
$2,500 per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal impacts.
Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may
enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
10. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extend-
ing a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade
and alignment as approved by the RIverside County Road Commissioner.
Completion of road Improvements does not Imply acceptance for
maintenance by County.
11. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State
Standard Specifications.
Parcel Map 23335 - Amend
dune 23, 1988
Page 3
12. Corner cutbacks in confonnance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
13. Lot access shall be restricted on Ynez Road and so noted on the
final map with the exception of one access opening located at the
northwest corner of parcel 1.
14. Lot access shall be restricted on ~rgarita Road and so noted on
the final map with the exception of that portion of parcel 14
abutting Nargartta Road. ~ ~ ~f~ ~ ~/½;~,~,F/~y/~
15. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460
and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA}
Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. If not, the applicant shall
file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of
a 'Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental
Code Section 56000.
Prior to recordatlon of the final map or any phase the applicant
shall establish a businessmans association to provide for
reciprocal parking and legal access.
- ~1~ ,
17. Lot access shall be restricted on Winchester Road and so noted
on the final map with the exception of a 35' driveway located
between parcels 3 and 4 as approved by Caltrans.
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Road Division Engineer
County of Riverside
f---TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
FROM
RE: PARCEL MAP 2335S, Amended No. 1
DATE: June 16. 1988
· E~vironmental Health Services
Environmental Health Services has reviewed Parcel Map 23335,
Amended No. 1 dated June 9, 1988. Our current comments will
remain as stated in our letter dated April 29, 1988.
SM: tac
'j~' JUN 2 1 1988
RIVEi~su~- CuUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GLN. FORM 4. (R~v. 8187)
'COUNTY RI\
OF ,r ERSIDE it.""
,-,':e-
DEPARTMENT "
[.J.~LL~ER,M
~~'~v~"' April 29 1988
1998
IRq~IIT I~nVICZi
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Attn: Gloria Maciel
RIVERSIDE CCUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~I<N GilTIll
i&illlO
1055 RAIdSEY STREET
BANNING. CA 12220
eLYTat
263 NORTH BROADWAy
IL'YTHE. CA 92225
CAllA ILAICA
7240 MARGUERITA
RIVERSIDE, CA 12504
CORONA
605 SOUTH IUENA VISTA
CORONA, CA 11720
880 NORTH STATE
I~I~T. CA 12343
IIIDlO
46-209 OASIS STREET
ielDiO. Ca 9220~
LAKE ILIIROR!
10115 FRASER OR.
LAKE ELSINORE, CA. 92330
fALl IPRIIIOl
3255 T,VIQUmTZ..MCCA/J.UM
23? NORTH'T)' STREET
· ERRIS. CA 92370
IIVERIID!
1520 LINDEN STREET
IIIVERSiD{. CA.
lUllDOgE
1888 liESSlOE 8LVD.
,RIVERSIDE. CA Id?SOI
RE:; Parcel Map 23335; Being situated in the unlncorporated
territory of the County of Riverside, State of California,
and be,lng portions of Lots 114, 118, 139, 141 and 142
together with portions of Lincoln Avenue, 3ackson Avenue and.__
Monroe Avenue and ad3oinlng said lots. All as shown on map
of the Temecula Land and Water Company on flle in Book 8,
Page 359 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, California.
(18 Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has revlewed Tentative Map
No. 23335 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prindts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a mlnimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the--.
State of California, when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept,
Page Two
Attn: Gloria Maciel
April 29, 1988
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in Parcel
Map 23335 is in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho California Water=-:T'' 2:"~'~
District and that the water service,storage and -- ~-.
distribution system will be adequate to provide=~wateri"~~'? :]~.I~.
service to such parcel, This certification does.'not~t~
constitute a guarantee that it willssupply
such parcel at any specific quantities, flows=o;
pressures for fire protection or any other purpose",f:5.::...7.:~:.
This certification shall be signed by a..responsible'~/.=~.~]
official of the water company, The ~A~s must
submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to Aeyiew'ati~?~!';!f~/=,!i
least two weeks E~ior to the request for the
This Department has a statement from the Rancho
Water Distric~ agreeing to serve domestic water to eachand':~:~!.'~"~'~
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing ,~'!!i~j':~!
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed wit~the~!:~-!~i:~-:.~
subdivider. It viII be necessary for the financialY~:~:~:/:";'.:.!~1-~
arrangements to be made prior to the recordation'of!i;;the"'~::~'i:,:;'!:~::
final map. , "' :'i: :: ::,:"
This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal:!,:'!~-"'-~
~ ,~ T:~ .. ..-~ .
Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the Distri~tj.,iThe.~-: '-:'
..... -~ .
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and~.:i.z~..~.i: ....
specifications as approved by the District. the County:'.,~$ ..
~urveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of .the"
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted'in triplicate."/: c:.
alon~ with the original drawing. to the County Surveyor.'Th~:
prints shall show the internal pipe diameterSlocation
manholes. complete profiles. pipe and 3oint specifications
and the size of the sewers at the ~unction of the new.system'<~'
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion ofthe~:=/!" ~."-.
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed..by".&~ .:.'.
registered engineer and the sewer district with the .:~ :. '-
sewer system in Parcel Map 2333~ is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern, Municipal Water
· District and that the waste disposal system is adeqUate'at
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed.
parcel."
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Three
ATTN: Gloria Maciel
April 29, 1988
The plans must be submitted to the Count_y Surveyor's<Office :~-".. :"~.""
to review at least two weeks prior to the reclues_t_f__or_the_,G~'/~. -
recordation of the final mal~. %.:
It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be~made'
prior to the recordation of the final map. ;<..~ ,
Sincer ly,
Sanitarian
Environmental Health Services
SM:tac
KE~INLrTH 'L. EDWARDS
C:HIEF EN~INEIEX
.. ."; '. '~' :?~;G':~-';~;,; ;'~ :~'~ ':'k, ~ ,, ',"...:~
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT '~:' :;~:~!7"":~.' ~' :,[~;'~:~
~vers~de County ::'-:?-" "' ,:~:- ...."''
County R~n~strat~ve Center ', '. ~:~;:'." '-L";. ~' ;' '
· - . ~:,~'-, , ;,,.;
~ttent~on: ~eg~onaZ ~eam No. I .,:.,~ .~ ~?:;'.:. ;: ,~
GZor~a Mac~eZ ,, ,.:,.'~r';;', "' "'
~ad~es and GentZemen: Re: ~arceZ Nap 23335 ?~;.'::;':' ;-.'
~'~ ,~, :, ~ .;:~ '.;:;.. ,,
.... ;':L:'; .': '
· h~s ~s a proposaZ to d~v~de about 10 acres ~nto severaZ co~erc~aZ"
Zots ~n the Santa Ge:trud~s VaZZey area. ~he,,s~te ~s'
north s~de o~ W~nchester Road about Z000 ~eet east o~.-Znte~State~'::C~;~;:
15. - ', '~ .~ -- ~ ~- ~ .~ ..~..:
Our review ~nd~cates that the entire ~roperty ~s w~th~n the:';,Z00
year fZo~ ~la~n caused by Santa Gertrud~s Creek which traverses .
the north ~t~on of the s~te w~th an estimated ZOO year fZow rate
o~ 11,300 cfs. ~he appZ~cant ~ro~oses to channeZ~ze Santa ,,.
Gertrud~s Creek b7 ~nstaZZ~ng hardened sZope protect~on.aZong ~th
banks to ~rotect th~s deveZopment. ~h~s reach of Santa Ge~rud~s
Creek ~s a ~ort~on of the Murr~eta Creek Master Drainage ~Zan ..,
fac~Z~t~es, and w~ZZ be o~erated and maintained by the D~str~ct ~f"
the ~roposed ~mprovements o~ Santa Gertrud~s Creek ~s constructed "~:,
to D~str~ct's standards. No ~nd~cat~on was made on the s~te ~Zan .'~'
how to colZect the fZows ~nto the ~zoposed, channeZ.; and ':how .~o ~ro--'
tect the Zots aZong Margar~ta Road. ,,:':~,,,;"~" '; "~:~.' ;':': ~:.;::;~ .'. '~:'
~oZZow~g are the D~str~ct' s reco~endat~ons m -:: ,~"'~ ;.. ,:-' ' ',?~.-":, :;,~:;~ ,:Zr ' , ~;'
~. ~s parcel map ~s Zocated w~th~n the l~m~ts o~, the .' .... "~
HurrYeta Creek/Santa Gertrud~s VaZley ~ea Drainage ~Zan
for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. ".. '.'
Drainage fees shalZ be ~a~d as set forth .nde~ the
s~ons of the "RuZes and ReguZat~ons for-A~n~strat~on o~
a. Drainage fees shalZ be ~ to the ~oad Co~ss~oner"as
part o~ the f~Z~ng ~or record o~ the' su~v~s~on' ~na1."".~-
map or ~rceZ map. or ~f the record~ng,o~'a'f~naZ,,.~r-:~:L;
ceZ ma~ ~s waived, drainage fees shaZZ be-.~d as
condition of the waiver prior to 'reco:d~ng='a~cert~f~-~.~'~-:''
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 23335
'Amended Map No. 1
b. At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment of'
fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Building
Director at the time of issuance of a grading permit or
building permit for each approved pargel, whichever may
be first obtained after the recording of the. subdivi-.?~
sion final map or parcel mapl provided however,Vthis
option to defer the fees may not be. exercised for
parcel where grading or structures have been initiatedT'"
on the parcel within the prior 3 year period,'or
mits for either activity have beenlissued on that.par-
Prior to initiation of the final construction"drawings'for>;=~
those facilities required to be built as part'of the -~"
Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area DrainagePlan,~Z/=
the developer should contact the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District to'ascertain'~the~.i~:'!7!~
terms ~nd conditions of design, construction,~inspection,!~/:-~
transfer of rights of way, project credit in'.lieu'of!fees~=,~'~.
and reimbursement schedules which may='apply.~(].i'i. Title~reports7
and title insurance must be provided for all right.of'way;.;
.to be transferred to the District..The developer-.should
note that if the estimated cost fordrequired areadrainage'~=;
plan facilities exceeds the required d[ainage fees and the~,~=-/
developer wishes to receive credit'for'reimbursement'in
excess of his fees, the facilities will be constructed as a
public works contract· Scheduling for'construction of''='
these facilities will be at the discretion of the District.
Hardened slope protection should be installed~'along'both
banks of Santa Gertrudis Creek to District standard.:-~The'i~/~
slope protection should extend from the top of slope to a'
point below flow line based on design flow velocities~'- The
protection should be tied into the existing c[Ossing.under.';
Ynez Road. ' ;' '.~,'-., :~!.~'.-~i, ~<~.~.~, !-' :,:~]:~" '
The proposed channel invert should be designed as close as..,
possible to the existing natural channel's slope
Arrangement should be made to channelize the flows upstream
of Margarita Road into the proposed channel to protect
those lots along Margarita Road~ otherwise, appropriate:=-=',
floodproofing measures should be provided for all the
buildings on the lots which are affected by the, tributary"..,
flows· Any blocking of the tributary flows or significan~T
ly raising of the upstream water surface caused by.the
development is not allowed. ,,--.,.]"~L.,-'.,,~i.~
. ,~ . .....
Riverside County
Planning Department
Parcel Map 23335
Amended Map No. i
-3-
A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain 'and '
may affect "waters of the United States", "wetlands" or
"jurisdictional streambeds". therefore, in accordance with ?-'
the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program
and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts.59, through73)~ and
a. A flood study consisting of MC-2 calculations, 'cross
'~--,
sections, maps and other data should:be prepared to.the-]j
satisfaction of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.:'
(FEbR) and the District for the purpose of revising the
effective Flood Insurance Rate Map of the'project site.~-=,:
The submittal of the study should ~ concurrent ,.with
the initial submittal of the related, project .' ~r.~IF:'j=:j'
improvement plans and final DistrictLapproval" will'
be given until a Conditional Letter'of
(C~MR) has been received from FE~.'.' , ~: <'.~'=~:.:~ ~.~,':~9..~.~
b. A ~opy of appropriate correspondence'and
permits from those government agencies
approval is required by Federal or State law (such as
Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Deparment of Fish and
Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to %he District
prior to the final District approval'~of the?.project.
~ere flows are collected or conveyed offsite, ~or where, --~.._;.
offsite construction is required for these purposes,' re-
corded drainage easements should be secured from the af-
fected property owners. Copies of these' easements should
be submitted to the District prior 'to recordation of the
final map. If easements are not obtained, hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted for District review which '~.
show that no adverse impacts, such as'backwater'ponding'
will result from ~e proposed improvements.'This is'par-:4:
ticularly important in reference to Santa Gertrudis'Creek -'~
and any impacts the proposed improvements might have upon
Winche star Road · ~ ~.
~ts abutting the proposed channel should be at'least 1
f~t above the 100 year storm water surface elevation." '-
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of'road right of
way should be contained within drainage easements 'sho~ on
the final map. A note should be added to the final map
stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept: free of build- :'~f,=:
Riverside County " -4- ~ ~'
Planning Department , I.: ,h~i>!C, .,.,;. ~. -~ ~.~: :~, ...~?:~:~, 77
Re: Parcel Map 23335
10. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within=L=.'~~.
~ublicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected pro~rty o~ers. ~e doc~ents should be recorded
and a copy submitted to the District ~rior to~recordation
~e proper~y's s~ree~ an~ lo~ g~a~ing s~oul~ ~e"~esigne~ in
a ~anner ~ha~ pe~ua~es ~e e~is~ing na~ural';'~rainage
~erns ~i~ ~espec~ ~o ~ri~u~ary ~ainage area. outlet.
points an~ ou~le~ conditions. o~e~ise/a ~rainage ease-
men~ s~oul~ be obtaine~ from ~e affec~e~ proper~y o~e~s.~
fo~ ~he ~elease o~ ~on~en~ra~e~ or.~ive~e~ s~o~m flo~s._
copy of ~he reco~e~ ~rainage easemen~ s~oul~ ~e su~mi~e~
~o ~he ~is~ic~ fo~ ~evie~ prior ~o.~he' .reformation[of
final map. ""'~' """ '.:~'~ )>~'.~T",
12. ~emporary e~osion control ~easures s~oul~ ~e 'implemen~e~'~r
i~e~ia~ely following roug~ g~a~ing ~o'preven~'~epos~ion.'~'
of ~eb~is onto ~o~ns~eam properties ;or - ~ainage
facilities. " ' "'~: ':'' "?C~' ~;:: ~;~'~"::'~:
13- A copy of the improvement plans.. grading plans:'and ..final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic Calcula-'
tions should be submitted to the District via4the Road '
Department for review and approval prior to recor~a~ion of
the final map. Grading plans should be:,apprOved prior to.
.
issuance of grading permits. . ':~?'~'. "'~j;,,":E '~:~F '~""'
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert~'~iang~'~'~..
of this office at 714/787-2333. .~ ..:~-.~'~;i.~? :~':=.'~li~::f~'i.~',;',~.'-
~nior Civil EngineerS/:..:~E...-:." ~(,
· : .- '-j?.7;...~- :-.:'~:~,~,',~ ~'-~:,r..-~,.., .',r~c
,,;~, . .t~;~': · .,
TO:
ATTN~
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTNENT
TEAH I, GLORIA NACIEL
PN 23335 -ANENDED I1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY-i~:.
FIRE DEPAR~T 'Cf': ;. · :-:.~.,,~,~:.~
RRE CHIEF "~'. :~": '~ .:~';'~" ":;"~:'~" :~'
; :,: . ':',~,~ :: ' Nvenll, CA 92501
' ,: ',': 2 - -' ".: ' ,~ { ', (714) 787~
' '. ~', ' ' ";~;F":: "'.~-:' '; '.;'
, ~ .' ,, "..: : ,
. ' ~,.:.', · .:~::gV :,%:: .:': ' ':~
~ , ' ,. ,~ L~ ~ - ' ' ::.~.~ ' ~ ..: ..
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the folioring fire protection measures. be provided
in accordance vith Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized. firs protection../
standards: , '.,' ',':~,,:;:!" :. ":-::~::~:j~.::!:/~i.,i:!:
ThE .ater mains shall be capable of providing . potential fire'rio" of::"5OO0'GPH";:~
and an actual fire flo. available from any one hydrant Bhall be 2500 GPN
hours duratio. st 20 PSZ residua opers inS pr,sur,. ",
Approved super f~rE hydrants, (6"x~"x2-2i") shall be located at each street ,'.T~'
no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet frog s fire hydrant..~:,.;>':~
,~ ~ .,.: - :~ ~4:-;~.~:· ~, :~'
~e applicant/developer shall provide vritten certification from the approp=iate
vqter company ~hat the required fire hydrants are either exisCin&"or tha~,~:~(:',' :::::~ ....
financial arrangements have been made ~o provide them.,: .'~,:.:.::';:',--~,,~(:,r: '::~:'!:.~:'::';;
Applicant/developer .shall furnish one copy of the vs~e= 'system'plans to/the ::
Fire Department for reviev. Plans shall con[on ~o fire hyd=anC Cypes,'locatton'
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fi=e flov =equtremenCs. Plans'shallV
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local rarer company-':'.:
vith the fo11~inS certification: '"I certify that Che design of Che rarer system.
is in accordance vith the ~equi~emenCs prescribed by the ~verel~e County. Fire
:' ..'.:. ~ ..,~, · ,
~e required ~ster systes including fire hydrants shall be installed and 'accepted
by the spptopriate vster agency prior ~o any co~uBCible .bullding.Sscezisl being-
All questions reSarding the meaning of the condi~ions shall be ~efer~ed Co ~he '~;"7"
~tr. D.par~men~ Planning and EnSineerins stiff. :~ .',~:;~-~c.:'~' ':'/,:~:~.,:: .:~,~-.<
~I '7~',:::: :- :: .' V{~:,~,: ':':~ ~' ','~:f:, ,? ,.':~ .2':
Chief ~lrs
ml
George Tatums'DepUty Fire Nsrshal'
Grading - BuHdjrxj and SafeLy . ~fe,'~ '
. ...~. ..,~ ~ '.!': ~- .
firadin~'s
crigjr~l camels renown ~ppl jc~ble to t. hjs r.~se.
GEN. FOH:,t 4, 3/65
oo ,
,. .?~ ~ ,.. ,,,.
the owner of that property ,hall obtain agrading
from the Department of BuiXding and Safety'.~:',.
___b,Prior ~o approval of this use/subdivision:. a.'grading
pe[mi t and approval of the rough :~ grading".: .shal
· .,,obtained .from the Building and 5afety.Department,'::/:'~'~"":...
c, Prior to issuance of any building permit, ,.~he:""property
owner shall obtain a grading permi~ ~ and approyal
construct from the Building and Safety.Depar~men~,:{:::'"."' :.
, ~ .... -.,, ~:
___d, ~ons~ruCting a road~ ,here greater than 5e cubic/-"yards .'
' of material is piac~d or movedm ' rlqu~r~s a
: z, , ~: .: '~ ':':_~ :.~ ~.
The following 'X ' marked comments pertain
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY.,'
· ": .... DATE: :',.
' .- .' ,-:/' ;::,,/:
;'~ INITIAL: :'~~
Refer ko the attached standard vesting tract'commen~s.
;'~.'
~.- : - . ..
The information submitted is too vague for specific
Please refer t~ departmental forms 3B~-k6~'
86, ~ 38~-Z~g when preparing a gradtn9 p~an.'~:,' ~.'-~-2
In order to permit your grading plan~ . the:,: following
t terns' ~ i ] X be needed. "'~:::: ~';:: ;~-'~-~;;'. ', '~':-.:-~
~ ' ,.~";.~': · ':';~'n-' -.7~'~""~ .:"~,~.~ .'
a. Obtain grading plan rev$e.. '- ~-" . ':, :~;',.~:,~. :'e ,:~/J.~:~. '/,<':',,
" b. Provide 3 cop~es of Preliminary So~ls 'Report ~:':;:?' '
c. Provide 1 copy of each oF the hydr.o]ogyj:.:.hydraut~c
review, standard improvement plan, and ';' : '~:
d. Provide clearances from the following.department, '
.... +~" ~ ': ."'
Provide copy of Planning Department :2 conditions ofI',.~:
,pprovaI for the ,ppraved orL':..tentative:, ,approved,'
case. "'
Provide an erosion control ;...plan , prepared ~:. by i'i.:i~:
licensed. landscape architect, "'.:')'-~- ..~'~.?.~,~:-:-.. ~:"":"
Provide a conceptual grading plan, :"~:~',-:?:'~.: :..:.:-~:~.-. :::' .-. -':::-~
Observe slope setbacks from permit" areas :-. '~and/or
structures per section ?ale and figure Egrl: of-;.~. the.
Uniform Building Code as modified byz. Ordinance
When obtaining a plan review permitw".submit~5'copies
grading plan to Building and Safe~y:LF,~for.';.~distribution .-~:
....
Sh~ street and pad elevations,. Insure'
can be maintained from back of pad to skre~, ~;~" ": .'
~-- ..
10.
11.
1P,
15,
l&,
1B,
Pl.
Provide {1) one copy of the hydroloqic/hydrau ic talc',,
, . :.~..~ :. ~
and drawings ~,, ...-. ,; -~ .:;':='~ ':.
Provide recorded drainage easements for the proposed
Show the Q16 and Q166 flows at the inlet and outlet to:
el I properties and at all drainage structure,:inlets' and
Provide building footprints on lo ::'
':
This property is located in ~',the~' Rancho 'l~alifornia,:;;~
Potential Subsidence area. Per Board Resolution BB-~I~/-:.:
lncludin~ the asphal t ic concrete, base material ~ .... and
earth moved this pro~ect Nill exceed. 56
ThoraX, re, . ~rading permit ~. required..
Design each lot to drain separately.":,~; Do. not use .common.~:-
Projects having an imbalance between the cut:;, and ':~fil
shall specify the location of their;':import:~or~ export,,' ~:,.:'~:
Show slopes, including terraces,-to scale.
Proposed off-site ~rading
notarized permission from the affected property=
No obstruction or diversion of natural
shall be permitted. .~...;~. ~ .:'~,". :-~Z.:;*/ ~,
. , , , ,. -;,. ? :~:, ', ~, ;: . · .
Provide topography beyond permit area, especially where,.:..
adjacent property is developed or being developed~.~::'~--'
Slope height may affect adjacent properties:~:':~:'-: :~":~)~':' :~
On flag lots show the ]ocation~ graded'cut:; fills:
scale that construct .'~the ,~.dr ve..- ....
. ,,-'~
will be required to
t
DATE: Hatch 9, 1988
Assessor
Butldtng and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Duda.
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Ftre Protection
Flood Control Dtstrtct
Ftsh& Game
LAFC0, S Patsley
U.S. Postal Servtce- Ruth E. Davtdson
iVE }iDE councu.
PL nnin¢;. DEP qClTIEn
DATE: APR ! t 1989 SXGNATURE
DI I~'A~C' ~,.,'In+ n~,m-~ ~.nd
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
P~_-'adeP~, r'_~tHornia 91125
-m
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
' (619) 342-8277
Should you have any questions regarding thts ttem, pleasedo not hesttate to contact
Glorta Nactel at 787-1363 .. ;~.r..'~:. i ;~.~!~:.'.:.~:. ! '.'!!:. -. _:.., '. :: .~:
· , , · 'i:ii
,',~ , "l *' !',' *~: "' -
Southern Ca1 tf, Gas - C~HERCIAL~ PARCEL' ~P 23335/CH~GE OF
~neral Telephone ZONE 5163 -~ (Tm-1) .~ Rancho California
Nt, Palomar Develo~nt Cmpany - Robert Betn;
Sterra Club · ~tl 1tam Frost and Associates '- Hurrteta
Nurrieta ChaSer of Comrce Area -Ftrst Supervlsortal ~Dtstrtct -
Callf, Native Pl~t Sodety Nor~ of Junction ofHtnchester Road and
Comtsstoner Bresson Ynez Road - R-R Zone "- 48,7 acres -
Proposal to su~tvtde 3 parcels. tnto
c~erctal; lots - (REQUEST Zone Chan
frm R-R 'to C-t/C-P) - Hod 119-- A,P,
910-11~029,31; 911-180-018 '
-.. ,-~,
Please revlw the case described above, along wtth the attached case 'mp;'~:A Land.
Dtvtslon C~tttee mettng has been tentafivel~ scheduled for Ha~ 12, 1988, .if tt clears,
Your c;ents and rec;endafions are requested prlor to Apt11 28, 1988 (n order that we
, : -.~
ma~ tnclude thm in the staff report for thts particular case, .-
~thouZh the proposed proJec~ is more than 30 miles fr~ Paler Obse~atory,~:":
~e request that any outdoor li~htin~ confo~ to the follo~n8 Zuidelines~:
~hich are fo~ulated to minimize the adverse effects of liZht pollutio~=~"V~'~ '~"~'
applications, ~he associa~ed business ~ open pas~ ~ha~ ~ime, in,which
4. Use low-pressure sodi~ l~ps for roadways, val~ays',' equipmen~ yards,.' 7":
Adoption of ~hese guidelines will help preserve ~he conditions needed for
~he continuation of research at Palomar 0bserva~ory, _ For further info~a-
~sistsn~ Director-'-, '
FASADENA. CALIFORNIA ellZl TELEPHONE illS) lSe-4OlS TELEl ItliJl CALTICH PSD: :' :' '- ~. -
Leighton and Associates
27715 Jefferson Avenue, Sutte 109
Rancho California, CA 92390
Attention: Hr. Dante1Chu
Hr. irk Bergmann
July 13,
- :IiVE:I)iDE :iCOUn;.u
PLAnnin6 :' DEPA:I;nlEn;
SUBJECT: L~quefacUon Hazard
Tentative Parce~ Hap 23335.
County ~o]o9}c Report No. 509.~'~
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed your repdrt entitled 'Preliminary Geotechntcal Evaluation'of ~!~'
Liquefaction Pote~tal~..Lots 1'through 18, Winchester Meadows, TentativeITract~.!:':
Map No, 23335, Northeast corner of Winchester and Ynez'~Roads, Rancho
California, Riverside County, CA,' dated Nay 1, lg88,/~d your response ~letter
dated June 30, 1988~ -... ~:...: " ,.-,,-'.~i::~:i:~- ~:~.~::. :'~:~ .'.
'. .' -, .,.it' ~tt'\ I'|' ';.,t':!~l;!''~ '~:'!'.;:'~i:',?.':;:~::'.:::~'
Your report determined thlt'the potenttal"{or lt'uefa¢~l~n'extsts°on the site
for an earthquake of 61.:;Lilf!lghttudeJ~lJll ~61Yl~ht&?.,'~roUnd',lcceleratton of
The factor of safety ag~JnS1;"'l~quefactton ']s-']ess-.than-he-for a layer of soil
ranging in depth of 10 t~ 20 feet belo~ the existing 9round suffice.-~.,:-::~Z'-::;.
. .....' -~'.:~.y'.~ !!' ":~i ~.~:'
Your report recommended that ]n ~rJer,to reduce the liquefaCtion potential, one:'
of the following alternatives should.be followed: :,::~::~!::.;~:,,,.:~7:,~!;:~:: !~..: ::!.:~.
~.. Placement of additional fill (approximately ~0 feet'in thickness)!L' -'~d
throughout the proposed butldtng and improvement area to 'tncreasetheI!~'''
overburden pressure. The existing 7, feet of compacted ft11~on Lots
through ~ wtll provide the additional measures to mittgate;~ .~",'-:L~-- ~.~
liquefaction. All buildings and the improvements such
located within Lots 6 through 18 should be underlain by~at least 10
feet of compacted fill. The fill blanket should extendlO feetbeyond
,,. ,.,,d,.. foo,p-.,.. ..'
2. Removal of approximately 15 feet to 20 feet of alluvial'deposits and-'~':~'~.
replaced and recompacted to at least 90 percent of:.relattve
as detemtned by ASTH D1557-78.
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
~ 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
~'- INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
. .; (619) 342-8277
3. Denstftcatton of the upper 20-foot subsurface cohesionless mtertal to
at least 92 percent relattve cropaction as aleretained by ~.D1557-78,;
by vtbroflotatton dyn~tc capaction, or other techniques..,::-, "~;~,:,., .+
4. Utilizing post-tenstoned slabs for the proposed st~ctures;"' This+-:'
masure will not mitigate liquefaction potential; hwever, tf'.,~ '~ ','~ -'
liquefaction should occur and ttts not too severe, post-tenston~
slabs should help keep the ~tldtng intact. ,,. '-.~,~.,, :~,-':'~',i~'~.';"~'L~::.':"
It ts our opinion that the re~rt was prepared tn a c~petent mnner and ::
satisfies the additional infomtton requested under the California '~'~'
Environrental Qualtty Act revtw and the Riverside County C~prehensive General
Plan. Final approval of the report ts hereby given. ,, ':,':.~'~'~,: .j'., ~'~.~:,':-7.~LY~;j::~::
Ne recmmnd that the following note ~ placed on the Ftnal tp prior to its
recordatton. "County Geologtc Report No. 509 was prepared for this property
Nay 1, 1988 by Leighton and Associates, and ts on file at the Riverside Count3
Planntng Deparmnt. The specific tt~s of interest are,liquefaction.and~.:,:~
seismic design oLstructures." ; - ,' ~.. ~'.~"'-,~,;;~, -.
The recomendations rode tn your report for tt gatton'of liquefaction ~.~, ',,~,:"
potential shall ~ adhered to tn the design and const~ctton of .thts,, proJect.
RIVERSIDE ~UNTY P~NING DEPAR~ENT"':::.,. ':~.
Roger S. Streeter ~,planntng Director
SAK:rd
C,C,
Nom Lostbom -Butldtng & Safety (2)'
Planning Team I -Glorta Hadel
GEN. FORM i. I/'6S
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ::-'::"';~ 'i:~,':":'~i.~!;~::;i ~i~'~:"iii~:i'::';c':;';;;!~'i': ,
Planning Department ," .U:. ~ .'.;'~';~' 's
County Administrative Center ,. ....
Riverside, California --.'-,
Attention: Regional Team No. I Re: Ch~n~e e~ ~-.e
Area: ~-{~ ~er~q~a V~lleZ , =',".'-:,:;~,::-
:: :' :' ::'~ :~ '=,,
We have reviewed thts case and have the following co~ents ~: '~:
;'. ~ '~ %":i:' ''~
Except fo~ nuisance nature local ~unoff which ma~ traverse po~t~ons"of the
. p~opert~ the pro~ect ~s considered free from ordtnar~ storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some.damage.,::,: New construc-'
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. ;;~:~::~.,~.,.~
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-.
courses which traverse the property. There ts adequate area'outside?of: the
, natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the 'natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet'stating,' "A11 new
buildings shall be floodp~oofed by elevating the finished floors a m~n~mum of
]8 1riches above ad3acent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
fo~ mobile home supports"
Thts pro3ect ts ~n the . ea
d~ainage plan fees shall be pa~d tn accordance ,with .the,appl,.t.cabl,e rules and
regul at tons. ': :: .,
~ The proposed zoning 'ts consistent with existtrig flood hazards.' Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing ma~ be requtred to fu11~ develop' to the
The Dtstr~ct's report dated ts still ~current,'for this., ~ro~ect.
.: .:
The D~strtct does not ob3ect to the proposed minor change':' .?'~,~,; ,.'
The attached co~ents appl~. ;' ~:~:;/~:~";::""' ""':;':
Ver~ truly' ~ours, ,. ,.: 2
cc: R~F ~ A~:~e~ DATE: K, II r I q 6 8. ""-~,-~:; ;' '~::
Rc - ....=
Riverside County Planning Department-, 'I~j]vZ=~>~_:~j![~?,'~!i!-'[\,~:'~Z
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor . . ..-.."";'-":-"';
Bo~dofD~Wm: Riverside, California 92501-3657,"::ff(, ;=-'~f ..~:b~b-I.~?::.
Pp~ident SUbject: Water availability :: ,.. ~ ?i~'. (: "~:,~ d .'
Sr. Vice Pnsident Reference: Commercial Parcel Hap' 2 3 3 3 5: .::~ :", !!
Jon A. Lun~n Please be advised that ,: the above-referenced
Jelf~yL. Mi~er property ~s located within the :boundaries o~
~alifornia Water District. Water' se~ice, . therefore2':~.
T. C. ~we would be available upon completion , o~7 ~tnancial :'
arrangements between R~D and ~e' property o~er.'~:~"~:~.:f:
Stan T. MH~ water availability would be contingent upon the.,.
Gene~ M~a~r property owner signing ' an ': agency ~; agreement ':',which
assigns water management rights, if any,': to.'R~WD."'K~'.'~
D~rofF~- If R~D can be of further se~ice to~you/Splease:'''
:. .h, -;~.. '-
contact this office. - .-;:,i- . ,;-:~'j:7~-~:'~T: ~j2's::a:-~:~:q,~/":
D~mr of En~.~g Ve~ truly yours, ~.~ j' ~-.~j~,.{~,/ = '~:':
T~o== n. M~,t,, ' "' ':c'~:~ ""''~: ',: '''~' ' :'--~'h]h~-?'
D~mr of O~Cions ~HO ~LIFO~IA W~TER~.DISTRI~ ~ ';
sen · t
Engineering. se~ices ~Representative
, "-' .'.:C :;"::'. ;.:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATE'R DISTRICT
28061 DI~ ROAD · ~ST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECU~, CA 92~174 · [714} 676-4101 · FAX ~714} 67~615
120/eg
:E,,ter. Mu.icipal er Di,tdct
~ Caem,i
~a~ ~une 23, ]988
4080 Lemon st., 9th Floor '~,~ .~. ~= ~ :,:~~~ ;,
Riverside, Ca 92501 - ~~~~~~ .'
~ECT: PARCEL ~P 23335 - Z~E C~GE 5163
The Dtstrlct ts responding to your request for' c~nts~';on' the?subJect~
project(s) relative to the prov]slon of water and se~r service. ,~The. ]tems
checked below apply to this project review.
The subject project:
x
2045 S. SanJacinto Street · Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacinto, California 92383-1300 · Telephone (714) 925-7676
Zs not wtthtn ENI40's:
~ water service area
sewer service area "~:~.=.!:~/~.i:..<!.~,, .~='~:=i':'i~'~'~' ;./" *:': '.
Nust be annexed to this Dtstrtct's Zmprovement"'Dtstrtct"No, ':" in order
to be e11gtble to receive domestic water/.santtary"seNer;servT~, ::.:.~.,..-'.
X,,, ~tll be requtred to construct the following factltttes.:.tf to'be served
a. ) Mater Service "
Any and all necessary regionally s]zed onsite and offs]te gravity sewers and
appurtenant works that mfght tnclUde mon]tor]ng manholes, 11ft' stations, force:~
f
mains, and e fluent d]sposal/use. Sewers w~11 not~'be' allowed' along/lot?
lines/private land. Fee participation ]n regional
effluent disposal must be mr. Only wastes acceptable :to EM~.~'~egulatlons
w~11 be allowed. A 15"
Must provide adequate' rights-of-way. The"-proponent~:'should::'i~Ontact:',-
EMklD' s Ri ght-of-Way Department. . ;, '-.-.! · ,~,'~;_,'~: ',,:='~: :;5:..-.' ~-~ ...'
water .storage reservoir
Ntll be requtred to use reclalmd water tn the greenbelt areas.,'
Zs wtthln the Assessmnt Dtst. fict,' 'Conditions 'must:be
tncluded that the tract cannot be recorded untt1 the assessmnt' has been
patd In full or an amended assessmnt district,has. been .recorded..:'
Requtres major master planning and the Dtstrtct cannot comnt 'until
Can be provtded w~th water servtce stnce the Dtstfict has'existing water .
Can be provided w~th sewer service stnce the Dtstrtct has adequate sewer
All above counts are subject to revts~on dur~ng:submtttal-'of .tracts~for
Should you have questions on any of the above co~nts,lplease call m, :-., -"
Planning Depar~nt .; ~:.~ :...~ .:-:;':% ~ ....:t.: ,-:~ '
,,: :IiVE iDE'COUnC.
LA
P nnincs DEPA CBEnC
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT -:.,
. . ·
,
I3XCHANGE OF ZONE NO. rl PUBLIC USE PERMIT N ~i ,; .;. "
13 CONDITIONAL USE 13 TRACT MAP NO. - ,' % ~ '.'
PERMIT NO. 13 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT'NO.
O PARCEL MAP NO,
13 VARIANCE NO. ~. - ~.. ~ .... ";
~NCOMaETE APP,~CATIONS WiLL NOT BE ACCEPTED. "~:(:':':~'':' T~!~'~'" '
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION ~' '~ ~*~ .
,
1. Applicanl'sNama' ]~anoho CaZ~fo~n~a DeveZopmen~ Company
Mailing Address: ~.O. BOX 75~, ]~ancho Cal£:Eo[n~a, CA 92390'
ITREIT CITY ITATI
Telephone No.: ( 1Z4 ) 676-564Z (8 am.-5 :~ "~
2. Owners Name: XatSer Development Company'
Mailing Address: P.O. aox 755, l~ancho Ca:UL~orn~.a,"'CA92390
· ,?,-' Attns' ~ l~obett ~emb~e
3. Representalive: Robert Be~n. 14~lZ;Lam F~ost and Associates
Mailing Address: 21405 ¥nez l~oaa,' ate.. C, aancho California, 'CA 9239(
NOTE: If more than One perSon is involved in the ownerShip Of the property being developed a se;arate pa;e muS: be
aftached to this application which lists the names and addrelies ot all persons having a.n inleresl.in l~e owr. ersr,~r.
App~ova~ o~ Change o~ =one for ~entat~.ve I'arce~ Nap No,23335 from
1~-1~ to C-~/C-P oone~stent w~th the l~anc.ho, V~:lagea Community
2. Rillled cases tiled in ¢onJunctl0n with this request: :'!:!' ~:~':. '%'.: '
~entat~ve Parce~ Hap No, 23335 ::~':;i:j~?/: '~;
1. AsSesaoflParcelNO(S). 910-110-029,. 910-110~031:~,'i*~1~2~, 911-180~018
2. Generellocallon(slreelsddress. elc.) Notth ot ietnchestet Road (Hwy. 79), r-ast. o~
3, Section Temecula Rancho Townlhlp 7S Range 3W
5, Legal description (give exact legal description Is recorded In the Office of the County Recorder), May be attached.
See Attachment A '
6. Thomas Brothers Page No. and Coordinates:/j>, ],14~D;.6 ~5," E6 :;' ::' ' '~'i :! :'; :'. "7" ,; .:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT _.. -~ TE
J.S Kli. nnnek ,' V :DA
,r ' EMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR ' : ti ~
' e" "46'209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
SIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501'3657 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
'7-6181 ~ : m~a~ ,u '~. ,, -,'r,
Please complete Parts I and II of thll form and provlde lll of the additional mired·Is r·cluast·d in Part III. Failure to do so may
delay lhe review and process of your DrOJaCL If yOU ate unable to provide the Information, or you n··d.lSsist·nce, plea.as feel
2. Is there a previous application filed for the same alto? YES ~ . NO D ;!:.~ . ·, .... ., , .
if "Yes." provide Case Number· AIIO provide the Environment· Aueasment Number, If known, and Environmental. Impact
3.' Additionai comments you may wish tO supply regarding your prOJoeL (AttaCh ·n Iddition·l sheet If
I. Is the project within In Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? YES i1 · · NO CX: * ~·: ~*:, '~,~ :;- '
· To determine If your project is located In a Special Studlel Zone, contact the Public Information Section, or refer to the
Special Study Zones M ads available at the Public Information Counter of the Pllnnlng DeplrtmenL If the project Is within a
zone refer to Ord hence 547 1 Or alllouiS the = tu·t On with the County Geolog st. ;:z - -. ,:-::~ , 2' :-',,.', ,
' tf a faurt hazard report is ~ecessary. complete the Investigation priOr to submitting your application and provide 6Copies of
the re ;Oft with this form. If a waiver of the re(luirements Is granted, submit · copy of the waiver with this form. ',i
2. ts P* e ;reject located within a hazard management zone or licluifaclion Ire· as shown on maps of the "Seismic Safety Ele-
T: r-e: e-"~ i~e if ycur =roje~.t iS subject to the geologic hazards noted above you should consult the *'Seismic Safety & Safety
E'e-e-t Technical ReDPal" which is available at the Public Intermition Counter of the Planning DepartmanL '~
t, '."e a ^swer to Ques~ic,~ *2 is "Yes," contact the appropriate Geographic PIInning Tale Section to discuss appropriate
r.,,.eas,.:re to minimize the hazard. Incorporateanymitigation melsurellntothe prOjeCt design priortolubmitting the s;ptica.
t,cn cr inCacats it, the space provided below the results of your dlsCulllOnl with the Planning Team, ~:*' ~ ,. ';'
3. if your I~roject is in the desert araa,'la It within a blowsand hazard area? '= YES O '- NO I~ .'~:::~' ~ - ,' · "
.The P;anning Offices in Indio and RiverSide will provide you with Information concerning blOws·hal hazards. You may also
wish to Contact the U.S. Soil ConserVation Service. ' . ' "-' ",/-::, '~ .. ' ,
If ye; r project is subject to blows·hal hazards, submit a blowsand control plln with the appliCatiOn. (Also refer to Section 14.1
of Ordinance 460, if your project Is · plrc·l sip or lubdivIlion), ,, - ,. :': .,r .'~. - ,
If "NO," how far must the water line(s) be extended to provide letvice? .~ : ..... :. · - -
Number Of feet or miles ..
", ,' · :~ ; .:i .' - .,~ '-. '.
If "NC." how far must the water line(s) be extended to provide service? .'.r~ :?-,: _ :.: ,. :,,~--- , ~ .
I,;,J.-.ber of feet or miles
6. Additional Comments: 'Z'hj.s ~-nv:L~ronmenf. a].' Znfoz:mat:Lon ~'o~:m:Ls subm.~t.t. ed w~l:h t. he
Request..:~o~ Approval .0~ .tentat.:Lve Z~a~cel Nap No. 23335 and ~-one Change,
(R-R t.o C-1,/.C-Z~) cona.tst. ent. v.tth the Ranthe V:Lllages Coznmun:Lt.y i>o.l.j. cy
Z~].an.. ~'he p=o::)ect has been ai:ld~reseed :Ln the env:Ltonment. al documenf. at.~on
p~:epa~:e¢l pzrev~.ously .io~' the Ranthe V:LlZagee Z=ol:Lcy Z~Zakn A~ea. -:
1 :. At least three (3) panoramic phOtOgrlphl (color prlntl) of the project litl, Or in letIll PhOto Of the mitt If color phOtogrlphs
· a. The pOSitiOn from which each photograph wll tlken ., ,,, ... . ,:., . I. , ., . , .,:-'.-, ..
2. A C~ear photocopy (XerOx or lieliar COpy) Of the IpprOpriat· portion Of the U.& Geologlcll Survey quldrlngl· mll~ delin-
eating the boundaries of the project site. AIIO note the title of the map, .: ! ,. . , '- :, ~ -.., . ...
I cert,fy that I have investigated the questlonl in Plrtl IInd II Ind the answer= Ire true Ind Correct to the best Of my
knov.,fedOe. "' Robert. Be XembZe, ~.l. ann:Ln9 Coozrdj. naco~r
Robeel l~e:Ln, Wtll:Lam h:ost. and Asspc.
· ME & T T F PIllSON COM L NG FORM ,
SIGNATURE
-:r'
· ~ Pan&
R~JI
8M
~1~ *te
· <; :IiVE:IMDE COUn;.
PLAnning DEP, R;ITIEn;
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ~'
~ CONDITIONAL USE D T~CT MAP NO. ' '~>'~'~ :'; e
PERMIT NO. D ~M~RY USE PERMiT'NO~t~t'~/'~ '~'~ '
~ PARCEL MAP NO. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q VAR~NCE NO. >~'~-'~:' ~~
a PLOT PLAN NO. '. . ~:' ' ' ': .::t, , =~ APR 14 1988
. ' . . ' . ;t: '. ·., ~ .
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCE~D,. : ..:,C.: . , ':::~ ~, RIVERSIDE COUN~
1, AD~licant'sName: gancho California Development Company
~iP' Box 755¢ Rancho CaZifo=nia~ CA 92390 ':
Mailing Address: ST , , ~t,, . , . . ITAT[ .
TeleOhoneNo.: ( 714 ) 676-5641 (8t~=5~),-.~.'.:' ~ ~
2, Owners Name: gs~Be~ Development Company
MgilingA~dress: P,O, Box 755~ Rancho Califo~nia~ CA92390
3. geDreSentative: RobeIt Bein. ~illiam E~Ost and Associates '
C," Rancho CaZi{o=nia'; CA 9239t
Mailing Address: iT~E?~05 ~ne~ Road,'
NOTE: If more than one ~on Is Involved In the ~nemhlD of the pro~y ~ing developed ~ separate page ~e
at ached to this 8pDli~ti~ which lists the Mmes and I~m~es of 811 ~o~ having an interest in t~e ownt , of
~ .. ~ ~ .... i~ , .
1. Purpose Of Request (describe project): (Ordinance ~8 rl. no.)',: ~,.:,,~f~,~:,.<' ':
Appzoval of Tentative Pa;cel NapNo,"23335~'fo= co~e~ciaZ use
(18 lots} consistent vith, the Rancho Villages Co~untty Policy
1. Aasessotl Parcel N~I). 910-110-029, 910-ZZ0-031~:~~ ~?.911-180-018
2.. General l~lion(slreel lddren. elCJ North of ~inches~er Road (Bvy.,'79},:
3. Section ?emeeuZa R~nehn T~Ip ?S Range L..
~ Legal description (give exlcl legal delc~pt~n ~ ~d~ ~ ~e ~ of the County RKor~r~ May ~ Ittached.
,,
4080 LEMON STREET, 9~ FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
(714) 787-6181
,. 4~209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Please complete PaHs I 8nd II of thll form IM ~ ~ ~ tM IddltloMI mte~ll rNuffied In PIH III. FIIlure to do ~ may
delay the review and Dryass ~ your Dr~e~ If you Ire unl~ tO ~ ~ Id~t~ ~ ~u ~ ilia ~IN feel
free to contact the Planni~ DeNHmnt It ~14) 787~18.. ~7~- · ~, .. =., ,('.~; :~ ~- ~
PART I: General Information ' ~ "~.:,~ ... ':~:~ :~'- ~
1. What is the Total Acreage Invalid? ~ 48 · ? , .
- ,
2. Isthereapreviouseppl~atlonfil~f~t~MmesRe? ~S~ ; NOD ,. ~ .... ;
If "Ye~" provide Case NumMr. AI~ pr~ t~ Environsnil AtoMmint Numr. e ~ ~d En~r~mn~l ImMct
ReDod Number, ~ appliMble. - . - '. ' , ~. ~-::. ·. :~ ~ - ~ ,. - ,- ·
CASE NO. ~ancho Vj ~ ] age. (Pe~I M~ Z~e C~e eta' "'~, ;' ~':~:: '>: '7~.:: ~': ~:~':'~':~-
3, AdditiOn81 COmmentS you rely wlh to ~y r~ffii~ ~r ~i ~i I~/a~ ~t (. ~J::
To determine ~ ~ur proted is I~ted h I Smll Stud~e Z~ ~tl~ the Put~ I~f~t~n ~ ~ refer to the
Special Study Zones Maps available at the Publ~ Inf~etion C~nter ~ the Pinnl~ De~m~ If t~
zone, refer to Ordinance ~7.1, or di~ the situation ~h ~ ~n~ G~il~, ':~.~. ~; ..~
If a fault hazard repod is n~sM~, ~m~ete the Inve~atlon ~or tO lubmiffi~ ~r ~l~tm
the re~d with this fo~. If 8 waiver of t~ muirsaints i grlnt~ I~H I ~ d ~ ~r ~h thl
2. Is the project I~ated within I hazard ma~gement z~ ~ ~uffl~ area el I~ ~ ~ d
j ct ~ ~ n~ed a~e ~u .h~i ~u~ t "~ism~ ~f & ~fe~
Element Techn~l Re~ ~h i avali~ at the P~I~ Info~t~ C~nter ~ ~ P~n~ DemmnL :'~/, '
_If the answer tO Question e2 ts "Yet" CO~ the ~r~rlte G~mph~ Pinni~ TMm ~i~ to di~u. a~opdate
measure to minimize the hazard. Incor~mle any mitigation measures Into t~ pro~ des~n ~rlo lumiffi~ t~ a~l~-
tion or indicate in the space pm~ed ~ the relu~8 of your dl~o~ wRh I~ Pi~iq TM~
3. If your project is in the dese. are~ ~ it ~Nn s ~w~ mard area?.' :' ~8 O ;:~ NO ~ ~7.":
The Planning Offices in Indio and Rivemi~ Mll pr~e y~ with Info~tl~ mml~ b~ ~rd~Y~ ~y also
wish to contact the U.S. Soil Conse~atl~ ~t ','~.'; :~.,,~t':.:'-;' ~:~ <:~.7.'
.
If your project is sub~ct to bl~s8~ h~mffit luSH I blo~nd ~ pin ~h t~ ~t~ ~ refer to Sffiion 14.
~ Ordinance 460, if your ~o~ct II 8 pa~l ~p ~ lu~N~n~ ~ :. ~., .~ ,, ": "::'~ ~'~
4. Is water seaice available at the proje~ ~e? ~S ~ NO D: ~'' ..... : '~J~: *
If "No." h~ fir must the ~ter lin~l) N e~e~ to p~ ~? :"'' .~ ~' ? :-' ': :'.
Num~r of feet or miles
. . ..... ~. -
If "No," how far must the water line{s) ~ eden~ to Wwi~ ~w~? '.;;;~' '~ ". ~:-','/~ ,~::~.'
Number of feet or miles
,
6. AdditionalComments: th~s ~nv~zo~entaZ Zn~otet~on ~otm ~s submitted v~th the
Request ~o~ ApprovaZ of tentative ~atceZ Nap No. 23335 and .~one Change
(R-R to C-ZZC-~) consistent v~th the Rancho V~ZZages Co~un~ty ~oZ~cy
~Zan. the pzoject has ~en addressed ~n the env~tonmentaZ doc~entat~on
~=e~azed ~=ev~ousZy ~ot the Rancho V~ZZagee ~oZ~cy ~Zan Area.
,- . . ...~.~= . ;' .~ ,: ,
PART Ill:Additional Matedill :.?:~: :.: .. .... ~:; ;-3 -/:..' ":':~",
.
The foll~ing items must ~ submi~ ~ ~ f;: ,, ': ' ~ ' ' ~j '..;' / -:- ~'~'~
1. At least lhree (3) panoramic ~OtqmpM (~ ~n~ d ~ ~ its, ~ an le~! ~No ~ ~ ~t !f ~ ~tqrlphs
Ireutillze(includelmlplnt~: . ;". ~..,;.; ,~,.
~ The ~.itio. frm which each ~otq~ m .~. · . '~: 3 :,': <~ '~;~F;': ~;- ~' '~:':
2. A clear Dhot~opy (Xerox or similar ~ d m a~r~Mte ~i~ ~ ~ U.S ~ 8~ ~dmngle m~ deli~
eati~ the boundaries ~ the ~o~t ~t i ~te ~ tal d ~e i ,. :,:/, ..;, .:-, .... ..~.-:.
I cedi~ thai I have Jnveatiglt~ 1~ Q~m in ~8 I aM II m~ t~ InNs 8m ~e 1~ ~ to t~ ~lt ~ my
knowledge. ~obe~t B. ~e~Ze, ~Zanning Coordinator
Robert Bein, Nilliam Frost and Assoc.
' ' OFFICIAL HEARING
. . :: :-~-~ .-~+~- ~.,%t. ~, ..~..~, · ~.''
R E ~ ~
C~NTY ~IN]ST~TIVE CENTER. NINTH ~R;~ '~'.~-~ e~,;~..~ ','~. ~.,- ·
40~ LEmN S~EET "::" "',~,~:A.':' '~:::":':..,,"~ ~,'.: :',.-" ":~
RIVE SID . ~LIFO~IA 92501-3657~::~?:':' ,' ,.:~:~.~h~,:,,:~:~.~.,:;~2~?
constder the application(s) described below, The Planntng Department. has'~q~
tentatively found that the proposed project(s) wtll ~:have no. stgntftcant::~f~.
environmental effect and has tentatively completed negathe declaratton(s),:~':~:C
The Planntng Comfsston wtll constder whether or not to adopt':::'the · negathe
declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing. ?,~..~ i,,:~!:<,'~',"~,i:~!~,' i~-~:.
Place of Hearing: Board Room. i4th Floor. 4080 Lemon Street. 'Rive~side.'CA
An ersor nsubmlt rttte n n:~';''~''" ':"';!{' ~'~""~:'
rco~nents to the P~an t Dedartment bef~ the
heartn9 or my appear and be head tn support of o opposition to the adoption
of the negative 41eclaratton and/or approval of thts project at. the time
heartng. if you challenge any of the projects in court. you my'be limited.. to .,:~i~:
ratstn9 only those tssues you or someone else raised at the publtc hearth9 ~'i:?~::.~:"
described tn this notice, or In wrttten"correspondence'~delivered'.to
Planntng Comtsston at, or prtor to, the publlc heartng,~":TheTenvtronmental
finding along wtth the proposed project application my be viewed at the publlc::~.!i~
information counter Nonday through Friday from 8:00 ,,,, :U..;?tt!.
CHANGE OF ZONE 5163. E.A. 32718. located tn the ~ncho ~ltfornta ~ea',and
F1rst Supervfsor~al Dtstrtct ts an appl 1carton 2~ su~1tted .~{' to:~ a~nd
· '. ~ ....
Ordinance No. 348. Riverside ~unt~ Land Use Ordinance. htd ~ndmnt
muld change Zone R-R (Rural Residential ) , ~':" C-1/~:P.'::..':~, (General
C~rcfal ) or other such zo.s as the Planntng"Comlsston m~j find
. - ..... ~. ~, .., :~.~
appropriate for property general 1~ described as '~north o~junctton:~of.:~::
.1nchester .d and Yne, ". ,
PARCEL ~ 23335. E.A. 32718. ~s an application su~ftted by ~ncho~llforn(a
· ~ · . ~, ... ,, , ~:~-~
and Develo~nt Co~aW for property locat~ . .'-, ~..j::t:.- ::, -
. Area and First Supervtsorfal District Nhlch proposes to'divide
acres ~nto 6 lots on proper~ generally descdbed. as 'north::~:Of2Junct~on~:'
/._. ': :l:"::',:: ':;. ;::: '.-,.':.:':: ",-'::"-"': ....
' ,. . :IiVE:I>iDE,C0UnC¥
Pl, nllin{; i DEPA:IaTIEfiE
FO,,:T
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA.) NUMBER: 32718 'MODULE: NUMBEROS):
PROJECT CASE TYPE(S) AND NUMBERS(S): CZ 5163 and Commercial P,M. :23335'~'::'~:' ': :~:'4"'~'~;"'~': !~"'~'
APPLICANI"S NAME: Rancho California Development Company
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING EA: Gloria Maciel
Be
De
Ge
PROJECT INFORMATION
He
DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum lot size and uses as applicable):, 'Applicant is proposinq
t~ divide 48.7 acres into 18 Comercial lots with a zone change from R-R ':: ....
{Rural-Residential } to C-1/C-P {General Commercial ). '~ ~ !'"
' o CONFOR'M~CE?':~''''
EXISTING ZONING: R-R (Rural-Residential) LS THE PR POSAL IN
PROPOSED ZgNING: C-]./C-P (General Commercial) LS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
STREET REFERENCES: North of junction o~ ~inchester Road and ~nez'Road.' '
SECTION. TOWNSHIP. RANGE DESCRiPTiON OR ATrACH A LEGAL~:;DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND, ITS SURROUNDINGS:
The subject property is currently vacant with moderate rolling hills,"'~dry'grass''
and shrubs. Surrounding land uses include commercial development to:the west;:"'"
II, COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION .~k.~;-,~.~
~ All ~ ~d of me proj~t site is in 'Adopt~ S~ific P~ns,"-"RE~p,~..~ "Rancho Villages ~mmuni~
~licy ~eu". ~mplete ~tiona III, W (B ~d C ~ly), V ~d VI.'~,~,; ~.~.~:.~ ~:~;-.~;:;~'~..~.~:i~c~. ....
~ All or ~d of ~e proj~t site ~ In "~eas ~t Designat~ ~ O~n SH~":~~ ~mplete ~t~ns .I I, IV
(~ B .d D only), V and Vl. ~,.'~.'~.~ ~,~.?~2~-~r" ~:/:~:"7~"-.: :.' ~::?.~
~ All or ~d of ~e proof site ~s ~ O~ Space and ~n~ali~ desig~ti~ o~. th~ t~e menl~n~
a~ve. ~mplete ~l~e III, IV (~ B, ~d E ~ly), V ~d ~. ' · ' ..... ~;
III.
Ae
Be
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND
RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Indite ~ nature of ~ pro~ land u~ as dete~l~ ~om ~ d~dgti~s. f~nd in ~mpr~e~ve ~ P~ F~ure
VI.3 (Ciml OM). ~is inf~mation is ~s~ ~ detemiM ~e ~pr~riate land uM
~ - Not ~pli~le Crlti~l E~t~ N~-High Ri~
Indicts w~ a ~s ~ or ~ (N) whether any envir~nll h~d and/~ m~rM issues may signlfi~ntly 8ff~t ~ ~ afroted
by ~e Dr~o~l. NI referenc~ figures are contain~ in ~e ~mprehensive Ge~ral Plan. ~ ~y ~ ~ffi~ yes ~) ~ite
addili~l dal ~urces, agencies ~nsuH~, findings of fact and any mitigatl~ measures under ~n V. N~, ~ere indiMted,
ci~ ~e ~pro;riate I~d u. suilili~ ~ noi~ 8~plili~ rating(s). (~ definit~s at ~om of
HAZARDS
1. N 12. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5-N
6- N
7.
(
8.
9-N
10. Y
11. Y
26- Y
27- N
13.
28- y
29- N
30-N
31. Y
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault
Hazard Zones (Fig. VI.1 )
NA PS U R (Fig. VI.3)
Liquefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VI.1)
NA S PS U R (Fig. Vl.4)
Groundshaking Zone (Fig VI.1 ) C] ass
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.5)
Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps)
Landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale
Seismic Maps or'On-site Inspection)
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Rockfall Hazard (On-site Inspection)
Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service Soil Surveys)
Erosion (U.S.D~. Soll Conservation
Service Soil Surveys)
Wind Ersosion & Blowsand (Fig. VI.1,
Ord. 460, Sac. 14.2 & Ord. 484)
Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.7) Sk~ nner Darn
Floodplains (Fig. VI.7) Va~ ] Dam
NA U R
Agriculture (Fig. VI.34 - VI.35)
In or Near an Agricultural Preserve Farml and
(Riv. Co. Agricultural Land Conversation
Contract Maps)
Wildlife (Fig. %/I.36 - %/I.37) Stephen ' s Kangaroo
Rat
Vegetation (Fig. VI.38 - VI.40)
Mineral Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI,42)
Energy Resources (Fi . %/I.43 - VI.44) Therma~ ~/aters
14..
15. N
17. N
N
20. N
21. N
22. N
23. N
24. N
25. N
(Fig. VI.8). ' .
RESOURCES
Local Important
32
Farmland, Prime · -
33.
:34.
35.
36.
37.
NA - Not Applicable
U - Generally Unsuitable
B - Conditionally Acceptable
395-10 (New 12/871
S - Generally Suitable
R - Restricted
C - Generally Unacceptable
Airport Noise (Fig. 11.t8.5, 11.18.11
. ~.':' & V1.12 & 1984 AiCUZ Report, MJ~.F.B.),
NA -:,A ,.' B ~ C~" D-'. (Fig, V1.11) ;:~.
N -Rallroad Noise(Fig. Vl.13-Vl.16)
Air Qu~i~ Impac~ From Pm~' "~?~,~~
~ Wa.r Quality Impacts From Pro~ct
.. Hu~dous Fire Area (R9. ~.~ - VI.31 ):~
Other: W~ th~ n: 5 m nutes .f~ re' respo qse
Y , ~n~ Highways (Rg. VI.45) .~-~ 5 ,~;.,.
N Histo~ Rearms (Rg. ~.32. ~.33)
· ,;' (Fig. ~.32 - VI.~ & ~.46 ,: ~.~).
Definitions for Land Use Suitability end Noise Acc;;ptability
":i~~ PS, Provisionally Suitable ~'
' ~ ~.!"~:.".'; A '- Generally Acceptable :'! , ;;;.
..... D - Land Use Discouraged
Be
Ce
LAND USE DETERMINATION
1. O~N SPACE AND CONSERVATION ~P DESIG~TION(s): .....
2. ~ND USE P~NNING ~
3. SUB~ IF ANY:
4. ~MMUN~ ~UCY ~ IF ANY:
5. COMMUN~ P~, IF ANY:
6. COMMUN~ PMN DESIG~TION(S), IF ANY:
7. SUMM~Y OF ~LICIES AFFECTING PRO~
. ..
~ aft pro~ts, ~i~te with a ~s ~ ~ no (N) w~t~r any public facilRies ~d/~
or ~ aff~t~ by t~ prowl. All referenc~ figures are
mam~ ~s ~, write data ~urces, agents ~sult~, findings of facL ~d
. · ~BUC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES
1-N
2-N
5-N
6. N
7-N
8-N
9-N
Circulation (Fig. IV. 1 -IV.11. Discuss in ],34
Sec. V Existing, Planned & Required Roads)
Bike Trails (Fig. W.12 - W. 13)
Sewer (Agency Letters)
fire response
Sheriff Se~ces (Fig W. 17 - N.18)
Schools (Fig. W.17 - W.18)
Solid Waste (Fig. IV.17 - IV.18)
Parks and Recreation (F~. W.19 - IV~O)
10- N Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV.19
· :' ': Riv. Co. 80O Sc~de Equestrian Trail Maps)
11- N Utilities (Fig. W25'-,.IV.26)
12- N Ubraries(Rg.W.17**.N.18),
13. N Health Services (Fq]. N.17~.N.18)
~ Fire Services (Fig. IV.16-1V,18) Within 5 minute 14. Y: Airports(F1g. ll.18.2-1L18.4,'within 5'mile'-
15.. N , City
17. N ', OtherL.
ff all or pad of the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REMAP' or "Rancho Villages Community Policy
1. State me relevant land use designation(s): Ca~'Xgory I I. eB°es~ gnated Conanerc ia Winchester and East of 1-15. ':
_-~_
2. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the policies and designations of the appropriate documem,
and therefore consistant with the Comprehensive General Plan? If not, explain:
N. IjM~D USE DEIliRMINATION (continued) : *~.~:':~; .~;~.:~."~?~.=
D.ff all or pad of the project site is in "Areas not Des~nated as Open ~ce", and is not in · Community Fqan,'complete
questions 1, 2. 3. 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community
(i.e. residential. commercial. etc.) ' !"~, ...... ";
e
7._.
Current land use category(tee) for the site based on existing conditions.:
(i.e. residential, commercial. etc.)
·: ... ' ~ ;-jr .~: i,.. . d ; -;
·
ff D.1 diffem from D.2, will the difference be resolved at the development' stage? ?Explain:
·
,
·
·
Community Ran designation(s): Rancho Villages Community PoliCy .Plan
Is the prolx~sed project consistent with the I:x)licles end designations 04 the C, ornmunity Plan?
If not, explain: Yel - W~thin Planning area "F" designated for: commercial-~land"uses
along Winchester Road and East of 1-15. .' '?."
· . . -
IS the proml compatible with existing and proposed surrotlnding land... .uses?.'
ff not, explain: Yes " ....
Nso indicate land use type
,'i:,:~;~'~', ~ ' ,. ~
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsisten~leS~':y/ Yes ~;:'~=!'~*:
F_ , all or part of the project site is in an Open Space end Conservation ' d esignatlon.';c~)mplete~the following:'
1. State the designation(s): ' ': '~ "?"~' ';->'<; :~ :~:' ;'~:-:" :; ':~ *.'~:~i.:'
· ~ ,,,: ,.:. .
2. Is the pr~l consistent with the designation(s)? If not. explain: .... ' %?'~'; .:.r?~'
3. Based on this initial SttKiy. is ~ proposal Cx)nsisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?,
ff r~){. refer~ by ~tlon and Iss4je Number those issues identifying' inconsistencies: .<,~L::.. 7 -~'
~ ......... ..~.
-,:~.'.:~;:'. . ~.- ,.: . -.~
ISSUE NO.
IIIB-2
IIIB-28
IIIB-34
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
IIIB-2
IIIB-3
IIIB-10.11
IIIB-12.
IIIB-14
IIIB-26
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, RNDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES''~?'~'~' "~:'= ~''''~
A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
SECTION/ INFORMATION ~TE
REQUESTED ~-::~' RECEIVED 'Li~.~?(YES/NOJ)ATE)
:~ es
Liquefaction Report 5-]?-RR .. '.,;**~ q '?.~..'y
Biological Report 5-12-88 ~'Z..' !' 6/88 '~"'" !!:': yes
Archaeological Report 5-12-88 ' 6/88 ~,:'!''' '~'~' !i,!~ yes '~::'`~
B. For each issue marked yes if) under ~tl~s III.B ~d IV.B, identi~ ~e ~tbn ~d i~ue num)r and do t~
following, in the f~mat as shown ~low: . ~: .~': ,~Z:.
2. State all findings of fact regarding environmen. I con.ms. ' "'., ~, :?~: ..... ~ ~ ~:~:~"~':'{;:': :""<=~.~:="~
3. State s~ific mitigation measures, if identifiable witho~ requiring an ~vironmental im~ct m~d (E.I.R.)
4. If additional information i r~uir~ ~fore tM envir~m~il amssment ~ ) ~mplt~ refer to
5. If additional sh~ts are nHd~ to replete this ~ti~, ch~k ~e ~x at ~e end ~.~ s~t~ ~d a~ch,
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION M~SURES:
The subject sitP is within a liquPf~ctinn pntPntiR1 ynnp_ ',Niti~tinn
are set forth in Liquefaction Report' No. 50g which~waS prepared~for:the
~uh)Pct ~ite in M~ lqRR ~nd will h~ i~l~m~nt~ thrnugh th~ rnndit~nn~ nf
The projec~ falls ~thin the Class ZZ groundshak~ng'zone:{:~The project w~11
adhere to the Unifom Building Code Standards at;"develop~':";t;~;:'%~''~::~`::`~:~::
Dam Inundation and potential floodplains will be'mitigated by~flood"contr01's
conditions of approval, ' ....
The project s~te falls ~th~n j few m~les of the Rancho Cal~forn(a A~rport.
No~se concerns ~11 be addressed at development stage.
The subject s~te encompasses h~gh,ay no~se, ho, ever:the':p~posed Use
(comercial development) is a compatible use for~"this area.~-'' '~"'~
Development of the property will result in a'loss of'prime and local
~. ,.~ :-, : ".' . ~.
Important Faml and. However, surroundi nq 'uses for '~th i s a'~ea 't nCl'ude'
Industrial and comercial land uses. Sur~undtng'~uses also are developed
Industrial and Comercial, therefore the sub~e'ctPropertY~"~ould~ot be
conducive for agriculture use. "L'~ "' ':~'~"':'*" ~'
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:':-:-.~::..
IIZB-28 Biological Report No. 212 was prepared for the s~te to address the ~mpact
on Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat on June of :1988. '~ No Stephens Kangaroo Rats
were found on the property, therefore no m~t~gat~on ~s required.' ~.q':..1.-;~: ,!,., :,/::~I ,
IZ]B-3:1 Thermal Waters is not technol'oq~cally feasible to access as "an
IIIB-32 If the subject property is to be developed the site will;;'be conditioned for
a landscaping plan prior to issuance of buildinq'~permits':'to'assU~ethe''~:~:'~L'::"~:~
Z]~B-34 Archaeological Report No. ~2:17 was prepared for'the s'ite;'and'no':;~{~ulture~:~
art~facts were found therefore no miUqet~on measures' are necessary.~:
~]~B-35 The pro~ect w~11 be cond~tioned that a qualified peleololog~st"be'present''~-'
D The proj.t wm ~t ~ve a .~.n~t e.~. me env.r. ment .d a N~aUveT~ D,lar~t~may
T~ pro~t ~uld have a signifi~nt eff~t ~ the envir~ment; ~wever, '~m will 'not ~ a Signifi~nt
eff~t in this ~se ~u. t~ mitigation measures ~ri~ in ~ti~ V Mve )' ~pl~ to the'
pro~t and a Negative D~larati~ may ~ pre~r~. ' ~; """: '~ :"
T~ proj~ may Mve a signifimt eff~t ~ ~e envir~menl ~d M Environmentl Im~ Re~d
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
D
W'J-70 (New
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 25, 1991
10. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP23335
10.1 Proposal for first extension of time. Project located
North of Junction of Winchester Road and'Ynez Road.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that the decision by the
Commission would be a recommendation to the City
Council.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:15 P.M.
GREG ERICKSON, Bedford Properties, Single Oak Drive,
Temecula, representing the applicant, gave a brief
presentation on what type of tenants are proposed
for this project. He also discussed access of the
project. Mr. Erickson presented Assistant City
Attorney John Cavanaugh a letter from Bedford Properties
op~psing Condition of Approval No. 16.
'COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to close the public hearing
at 8:20 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91-(next] recommending
that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 23335
based on the analysis and findings contained in the
staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval
as presented by staff.
11.1
PARCEL MAP 26664
Park
GARY
off
for a 21 parcel Planned Industri~
ion on the Site of previously Plot Plan
Located at the southeasterly of Business
and Rancho Way.
L advised that this would be continued
12. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 91-1
12.1
Proposal to provid,
Plan approvals
Permits city
:ension Procedure for Plot
Conditional Use
STEVE
provided the staff re
HOAGLAND moved to Adopt Resolut: 1
recommending to the City Council
inance Amendment 91-i providing an Extension of
PCMIN2 5/91 -12- 2/26/91
./
DATE:
TO:
MEETING OF:
AGENDA ITEM
No.:
SUBJECT:
MINUTE ACTION OF TIlE CI l Y COUNCIL OF TIlE
CITY OF TE1MECULA, CALIFORNIA
March 28, 1991
Gary Thornhill
City of Temecula Planning Department
March 26, 1991
Item 17
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 - First Extension of Time
The motion was made by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall
to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335, A SIX (6) PARCEL COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION OF 10.18 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF THE JUNCTION
OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910-110-029, 031, AND 910-180-018.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
./.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temec,da, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY,
under penalty of perjury, the forgoing to be the official action taken by the City Council at the
above meeting.
IN W/TNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 281h day of March, 1991.
[SEAL]
Minu~ Ol~=r
ITEM NO. 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~ "'
FINANCE OFFICER~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
DATE:
September 10, 1991
SUBJECT:
Final Tract Map 24232
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 24232 subject to the Conditions
of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tract No. 24232 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department
on October 4, 1989. The Tentative Tract Map was approved by the Board of
Supervisors on May 23, 1989.
Tract No. 24232 contains 11 residential lots within 4.91 acres. The tract is located
on the south side of Nicolas Road and east of Calle Medusa. This Tract is part of
Zone Change No. 5392. The Developer is U.S. Home Corporation. The following fees
have been paid or deferred for Final Tract Map No. 24232:
Area Drainage Fee
Signal Mitigation Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee
Stephen's K-Rat Fee
Parkland/Quinby Fees
(Paid) $ 5,022.93
(Paid) 1,650.00
(Deferred) 4,400.00
(Paid) 9,574.50
(Paid) 12,780.00
STAFFRPT~24232. FFM
1
Page 2
FinaiTract Map
No.24232
Improvements for Tract 24232 are currently under construction and are bonded
through neighboring Tract No. 23220. U.S. Home Corporation is responsible for the
development of both Tracts, and Staff has determined that the existing bonds are
adequate for these projects. Any City Council acceptance of the improvements with
the resulting reduction in Bond amounts will be processed in the regular manner and
the mandatory one year warranty period will be required. The Labor and Materials
Bond will be retained in place for the statutory 90 to 180 day lien period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not Determined
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that City Council Approve Final Tract
Map No. 24232 subject to the conditions of approval.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Development checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Conditions of Approval
Fees and Securities Report
STAFFRPTX24232.FTM
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Tract Map No. 24232
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 39
(Planning)
Condition No.21 a
(planning)
Condition No. 19
(Roads & Surveyor)
Condition No. 16
(Planning)
Condition No. 1 (Flood
Control & Water District)
STAFFRP~I~'M24232
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT NO. 24232
DATE: August 1,1989
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage
$ N/A
Water
$ N/A
Sewer
$ N/A
TOTAL
$ N/A
*Maintenance Retention (10% for one year)
*(or Bonds if work is completed)
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
Fee Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
-0-
-0-
5,022.93
1,650.00 -0-
-0-
,082.75
-0-
250.00
,332.75
-0-
STAFFRPTX24232. FFM
, CZ5312/TR242:32 J LAND USE I I
App. t1~ BIE~rd. OP'tKNT, INC.
UII R-A-IL/I ?0 R-I ,,
SaC. It T.T I.,R. II.
· I ,
,
RI IL PIt,SS-CDre O8/ $1/ll Dr~wn By RG,It::i~,/
4O0' RPtIRS1)E {ZX,NTY PI, AIWi~ DEPARTMENT ,
.?:~NT IIY:C,M E. NG, ~N BERNI:IR, .I 9..- 4-91 9-'454:1,1; '7148896143~ CC]TT I5,.3;$I 2
TRACT NO. 2~232
m~ ~kNI m. see ~Ad~ t' w die
VlCtNI"I~ MAt
.. ' -liVE:I, iDE COUFICu
PL nnane DEPat.
JAN 10 1990
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT HAP N0. ~4~2 :'
E. A. N~B~: 33549~
R~]ON~ T~ ~. One
Dear lppl tcant:
The Riverside County Board of )Jpervtsors has taken the following action on the above
referenced tentative tract mp at Its regular meeting of January 2, 1990 .
XX Iv°PROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions.
DENIED tentative map based an attached findings.
APPROVED withdrawal of tentative map.
The tract map has been found to be cmslstent with all pertinent elements of the
t Environmental
Riverside Ceunty General P)an and is in cgnpliance with the Cal fornia
t ra o
A cmdttimally mppr~/ed tenta~.fve'~'tract map shall expire t)A.'.mmths after the approval at
the Board of Supervtsort~ Hem~-t~_ihe-del;e of whic is mhoW~abov~, unless within that
period of time a ftna).aaaLsheT1/(aL beep appr%ed and f~ '.j~Ith the County Recorder.
Prior to the expiration d'~t~.'ZLhem.~idl~)vfd6~(inly/'alppli .|~'~lir.~ing for an extension of
time. A~plicatton shall')lie ' ~.lp~he NaMing ~.tnj'.U~ffty (30) days prior to the
exptrattm date of the ten ' 41a'p;'. ]q~l~lB~)'W)fJ)bjl)~,~s~;'N.y extend the period for
me 3~ar and upon further ap ~att~ a sc~.d aRd m tth~d J=ar. '
.____~Yery truly yours.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT
Roger S. $treeter. Plmnntng Director
/ R
'K~m Jarre11 Johnson, Sen~or Planner
LC:lgg
fiLE- IIHITE
4080 LEMON STREET, P FL(X)R
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
IP~Ir..ANT- CANARY
BIGIMEER- PINK
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
#
m
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL DATE: November 21, 1989
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 5392, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24232 - Dix
Development - First Supervisorial District - Skinner Lake Area -
4.91 Acres - 11 Lots - Schedule A - REQUEST: R-1
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
The Planning ConTnission and Staff Recon~nend:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment
No. 33549 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not
have a significant effect on the environment; and,
APPROVAL of CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 5392 from R~A-2~ to R-1 in
accordance with Exhibit 2, based upon the findings and conclusions
incorporated in the Planning Convnission minutes dated October 4,
1989; and
APPROVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 24232, subject to the attached
conditions, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planning Con~ission minutes dated October 4, 1989.
"'~:~ ~gg
11/21/89
Rog e P1Xnnihgbirecto r
PTev. Agn. tel.
Depts. Comments Dist.
AGENDA NO.
RZVERS/DE COUNTY PLANNING COHH]SSiON MTNUTES
OCTOBER 4, 1989
Staff recaphanded approval of the subject extensions of time. Upon motion by
CaTntsstoner Turner, seconded by Canmtsstoner Purrlance, and unanimously
carried, the Car, ntsston approved the second extension of ttme for Commercial
Parcel Nap No. 21194 to September 23, 1990, the first extension of ttme for
C~,,,,erctal Parcel Map No. 21382 to Hatch 10, 1990, and the first extension of
time for Parcel Nap No. 22325 to September 1, 1990.
(AGENDA ]TEH 2-1 - Tape 1A)
CHMGE OF ZONE CASE S392 - EA 33549 - Dtx Development, Inc. - Skinner Lake Area
- First Superrlsortal Dtstrlct - 4.91t acres, south of Ntcolas Rd, east of
Calla Medusa - R-A-2~ to R-l, etc. with TRACT Ra.p NO. 24232 o 11 l~ts -
4.91-, acres - Schedule A
Hearing was opened at 9:56 a.m. and was closed at 10:01 a.m.
STAFF RECOHMENDATION: Adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 33549,
approval of Change of Zone S392, approval of the waiver of lot length to w~clth
ratio for Lots 8, 9 and 11, and approval of Tentative Tract No. 24232 based on
the findings and conclusions listed tn the staff report. The applicant
proposes to change the zone of 4.91 acres from R-A-2~ to R-1 and to divide the
peered1 tnto 11 lots. The stte ts located south of Ntcolas Road and east of
alle Medusa. Surrounding zontng Is R-A-2kh R-A-S and RoT. The stte ts vacant
and partially mountainous. The surrounding area ts primarily vacant, w~th
scattered residential. The site Is.located w~th~n the Rancho Tenecula Subarea
and ts consistent vrith the General Plan and area development. The proposed
density would be consistent with the SNAP designation of 2-4 dwelltng units per
acre. The 1nittel study for EA 33549 tn~cated several concerns, the ma~n
concern being the htstortc habitat range for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Conditions have been drafted and approved by County Counsel for cases such as
this one where K-Rats are found on a stte not located tn a study area. That
condition requtres that a habttat conservation plan be tn place prior to
tssuance of a butldtng or gradtrig permtt.
TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT:
Gary Koontz (CM Engineering, 255 E. Atrport Drive, San Bernardtrio) adrlsed that
they agreed with ell conditions as su~ttted. No one else fram the suaVerice
wished to cement on this easter.
Camtsstoner Turner said that more end more projects ere camtrig through with
evidence of habitation by the Stephens Kangaroo Rat. He asked tf those anteels
t s a~ exist or a~ f~nd tn sine a~as, ~ antmils are
s1111 11ntted In ~strl~tton cmpa~d on a ~tonal ~sts.
Ccentsstoner Purrlance satd that the spectes has been declared endangered, and
ere used to gatn the financing to preserve same portton of their present range
3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLNf. NING COt,!HZSSZON MINUTES
OCTOBER 4, 1989
so that tt will not disappear entirely. Jn other words, this ts a mechanism to
a11o~ the County to meet Federal regulations and set up an area ~here the K-Rat
can be preserved,
The hearing was closed at 10:01 m.m.
FZNDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Change of Zone No. 4392 is a request to change the
zone on 4.9! acres from R-A-2~ to R-I; Tract 24232 proposes a subdivision which
would create 11 lots with a minimum lot size of 7200 square feet; the site ts
located in the Rancho California area south of Ntcolas Road and east of Calle
Medusa; the project site is vacant; surrounding land uses are also vacant; the
properly lies adjacent to the north of Tentative Tract 23220, which calls for
29 lots on 9.8 acres, with a minimum lot size of 7200 square fee~; zoning on
the site. is R-A-Zki; surrounding zontn9 includes R-A-5, R-A-2~ and R-T; the
r n
project has been designed to be in confoment, with 0 dt ance Nos. 348 and 460;
the site is located within the Rancho Caltforntarrenecula subarea of the
Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area; the tentatively approved Southwest
Territory Area Coneunity Plan designates the site for residential, 2-4 dwelling
units per acre; envtromental concerns tnclude slope stability, erosion,
biological resources, archaeological resources and paleontologtcal resources;
and, all envirormnental concerns can be mitigated by the conditions of approval.
The proposals are in conromance wtth the Comprehensive General Plan and the
tentatively approved Southwest Area Plan; is consistent with Ordinance 348;
end, will not have a significant effect on the enfirorfnent.
MOTION: Upon morton by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Cmtsstoner Donehoe,
and unanimously carried, the Conmission recommended to the Board adoption of
the Negattve Declaration for EA 33549, approval of Change of Zone 5392 from
R-A-2k~ to R-l, tn accordance with Exhtbit 2, approval of the waiver of lot
length to width rattos on Lots 8, 9 and 11, and approval of Tentative Tract No.
24232, subject to the conditions of approval and based upon the above findings
and conclusions.
ROLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLOWS:
AYES:
Cemmtsstoners Turner, Donahoe, Beadling, Purrlance and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
AGENDA ITEIR 2-2 -Tepe 1A)
~U~GE OF ZD E GAS S - 33726 - II. H. Rawltngs Inc.
N E 445 EA ,
Murrteta Area - First Suporrlsorlal District - 8.06~ acres,
Guava, westerly of Jefferson - A-1-10 to M-$C, etc.
(Terry McGraw) -
southerly of
RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING COHH]SS]ON HINUTES
OCTOBER 4, 1989
Staff reco~rnended approval of the subject extensions of time. Upon motion by
C~,,,,tsstoner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Purrlance, and unanimously
carried, the Camntsston approved the second extension of time for Commercial
Parcel Nap No. 21194 to SaproBber 23, 1990, the first extension of time for
Conlnerctal Parcel Map No. 21382 to March 10, 1990, and the first extension of
time for Parcel Map No. 22325 to September 1, 1990.
(AGENDA ITEM 2-1 - Tape 1A)
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 5392 - EA 33549 - Dtx Development, Inc. - Skinner Lake Area
- First Superdsortal District - 4.91~ acres, south of Ntcolas Rd, east of
Calla Medusa - R-A-2~ to R-I, etc. with TRACT HAP NO. 24232 - 11 l~ts -
4.91-, acres - Schedule A
Hearth9 was opened at 9:56 a.m. and was closed at lO:O1 a.m.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 33549,
approval of Change of Zone S392, approval of the waiver of lot length to vtdth
ratio for Lots 8, 9 and 11, and approval of Tentative Tract No. 24232 based on
the findings and conclusions listed in the staff report. The applicant
proposes to change the zone of 4.91 acres from R-A-2~ to R-1 and to divide the
arcel into 11 lots. The site is located south of Nicolas Road and east of
~alle Medusa. R-A-2kh and R-T The site s
is . t vacant
Surround1 ng zoni
ng R-A-5
and partially mountainous. The surrounding area 1s primarily vacant, vith
scattered residential. The site is. located w~thin the Rancho Te~ecula Subarea
and is consistent wtth the General Plan and area development. The proposed
density would be consistent wtth the SVIAP designation of 2-4 dwelltn9 units per
acre. The initial study for EA 33549 indicated several concerns, the main
concern being the historic habitat range for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Conditions have been drafted and approved by County Counsel for cases such as
this one where K-Rats are found on a site not located in a study area. That
condition requires that a habitat conservation plan be in to
pl ace prt or
tssuance of a building or grading permit.
TEST|IqONY OF PROPONENT:
Gary Koontz (OH Englneerlng, 255 E. Atrport Drive, San Bernardino) addsad that
they agreed rlth all conditions as submitted. No one else iron the audience
~shed to cement on this Batter.
Caa~tsstoner Turner said that more and more projects are coming through vtth
evidence of habitation b~ the Stephens Kangaroo Rat. He asked tf those animals
st111 1tatted tn distribution caBpared on a ragtonal bists.
Cemlsstoner hrvlance setd that the species has been declared endangered, and
are used to gain the financing to preserve same portion of their present range
3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PL!NJNG COHHZSSZON NINUTES
OCTOBER 4, 1989
so that tt ~dll not disappear entirely. In other ~ords, this is a mechanism to
a11o~ the County to meet Federal regulations and set up an area ~here the K-Rat
can be preserved,
The bearing Nas closed at ]O:OZ a,m.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Change of Zone No. 4392 ts a request to change the
zone on 4.91 acres from R-A-2~ to R-l; Tract 24232 proposes a subdivision which
would create 11 lots ~th a mtnimum lot stze of 7200 square feet; the stte ts
located tn the Rancho California area south of Nicolas Road and east of Calla
Nedusa; the project sltets vacant; surrounding land uses are also vacant; the
p~operly 1tea adjacent to the north of Tentative Tract 23220, ~htch calls for
29 lots on 9.8 acres, tdth a mtntmum lot stze of 7200 square fee~; zontng on
the stte. is R-A-2~; surrounding zontng includes R-A-S, R-A-2~ and R-T; the
project has been designed to be in confomance ~th Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460;
the site is located ~dthtn the Rancho Caltforniarrenecula subarea of the
Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area; the tentatively approved Southwest
Territory Area Cemmuntty Plan designates the site for residential, 2-4 d.elling
units per acre; envtromental concerns include slope stability, erosion,
biological resources, archaeological resources and paleontologtcal resources;
and, 811 enviromental concerns can be mitigated by the conditions of approval.
The proposals are in conromance with the Comprehensive General Plan and the
tentaUvely approved Southwest Area Plan; is consistent ~tth Ordinance 348;
and, ~11 not have a significant effect on the enviroment.
NOTION: Upon motion by CGmmtsstoner Turner, seconded by Cm~tsstoner Donahoe,
and unanimously carried, the Ca~ntsston recommended to the Board adoption of
the Negative Declaration for EA 33549, approval of Change of Zone 5392 from
R-A-2~ to R-l, in accordance ~tth Exhtbtt 2, approval of the waiver of lot
length to vidth ratios on Lots 8, 9 and ll, Ind approval of Tentative Tract No.
24232, subject to the conditions of approval and based upon the above findings
and conclusions.
ROLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLOWS:
AYES:
Cmmtsstoners Turner, Donahoe, Beadling, Purvtance and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
AGENDA ITEM 2-2 - Tape 1A)
t~H~GE OF Z[) E GAS S - 33726 - i. Rawlings. inc. (Terry McGraw)
N E 445 EA H. -
Murrleta Area - First Suporrlsorlal District - 8.06~ acres, southerly of
kava, westerly of Jefferson - A-l-10 to N-SC, etc.
4
PLAnnin
DATE: January 2, 1990
RE:
J/ N 10 1990
/ ..... ,...,
TENTAT] VE TRACT HAP J~0. 24232 ....
E. A. N~B~: 33549~
R~ION~ T~ ~. One
Dear ~ppl Icant:
The RIverside Ceunty Board ef ~,pervtsors has taken the following action
referenced tentative tract mp at its regular meeting of January 2, 1990
XX APPRDVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions.
on the above
, DENIED tentative map based m attached findings.
APPROVED withdrawal of tentative map.
The tract map has been found to be consistent with all pertinent elements of the
i a
Riverside Cajnty General P]an and is in c anpliance with the Ca1 forni Environmental
Quality Act of 1970. ronp~J,°t will nat have m significant effect on the environment
and a Negative Declare has ~llJdopted.
A cmdttimal ly mpproV~ed tenta :fve'T~"{rmct map shall expire _~A'.months after the approval at
the Board of Supervisor%. Ite-_ris,'j~_J~he-dete ef ~f, tch is m/Tme~j'~abC~e, unless within that
teriod of time a final amaLshell/~ leer rapproved and f~ .~wlth the C~unty Recorder.
Prior to the expiration d~t~,:U~em.~lil~;)vfder(inlyT'a)ppli .lulr.~tng for an extension of
time, Application shall') lie ' ~.l~the Planaing ~,tn~',tl~ffty (30) days prior to the
expiration date of the ten ' ~la'p;'. )~NflBg)-W)~j)b~).)~,~s~)mf$;'lMy extend the period for
me 3ear and upon further mp ?tatt~ a sc%a.d and m t~i~d ),~er. '
· 3 iVery truly ymrs,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Roger S, Streeter, Planning Director
'K~m aarretl Johnson, Sen~or Planner
Ii
LC:lgg
fiLE- MHITE
4080 LEMON STREET, P FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
Nq~,ICANI- CANARY
IEMGIREER- PINK
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
#
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: THE PLANNING DEPARTHENT SUBMITTALDATE: November 21, 1989
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5392, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24232 - Dix
Development - First Supervisorial District - Skinner Lake Area -
4.91 Acres - 11 Lots - Schedule A - REQUEST: R-1
RECOMMENDED HOTION:
The Planning Co~rnission and Staff Recon~nend:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment
No. 33549 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not
have a significant effect on the environment; and,
APPROVAL of CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5392 from R-A-2~ to R-1 in
accordance with Exhibit 2, based upon the findings and conclusions
incorporated in the Planning Cotmission minutes dated October 4,
lg89; and
APPROVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24232, subject to the attached
conditions, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planning Convnission minutes dated October 4, 1989.
,"h~ ~ gg
11/21/89
) 11,,I, 112112)
Prey. Alin. rel.
Depts. Comments Dist.
AGENDA NO.
. ['q"IL':I"-'I"21~"i;R24232 J LAND USE I ' I
~NT %~Y:Chl ENG, SiqN BERNP. R, ~ c~_ 4-91 cJ:45i:ahl ~ 714~9~:J6143..) CCITT (33~# 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Tract Map No. 24232
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 39
(Planning)
Condition No.21 a
(planning)
Condition No. 19
(Roads & Surveyor)
Condition No. 16
(Planning)
Condition No. I (Flood
Control & Water District)
STAFFRPT~FTM24232
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT NO. 24232
DATE: August 1, 1989
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage
$ N/A
Water
$ N/A
Sewer
$ N/A
TOTAL
$ N/A
*Maintenance Retention (10% for one year)
*(or Bonds if work is completed)
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
$
$
$
$
$
$
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
Fee Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
-0-
-0-
5,022.93
1,650.00 -0-
-0-
,082.75
-0-
250.00
,332.75
-0-
STAFFRPTX24232. FTM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER~
CITY MANAGER ",.~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
DATE:
September 10, 1991
SUBJECT:
Final Tract Map 24232
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 24232 subject to the Conditions
of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tract No. 24232 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department
on October 4, 1989. The Tentative Tract Map was approved by the Board of
Supervisors on May 23, 1989.
Tract No. 24232 contains 11 residential lots within 4.91 acres. The tract is located
on the south side of Nicolas Road and east of Calle Medusa. This Tract is part of
Zone Change No. 5392. The Developer is U.S. Home Corporation. The following fees
have been paid or deferred for Final Tract Map No. 24232:
Area Drainage Fee
Signal Mitigation Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee
Stephen's K-Rat Fee
Parkland/Quinby Fees
(Paid) $ 5,022.93
(Paid) 1,650.00
(Deferred) 4,400.00
(Paid) 9,574.50
(Paid) 12,780.00
STAFFRPT~24232 .FTM
Page 2
FinaiTract Map
No.24232
Improvements for Tract 24232 are currently under construction and are bonded
through neighboring Tract No. 23220. U.S. Home Corporation is responsible for the
development of both Tracts, and Staff has determined that the existing bonds are
adequate for these projects. Any City Council acceptance of the improvements with
the resulting reduction in Bond amounts will be processed in the regular manner and
the mandatory one year warranty period will be required. The Labor and Materials
Bond will be retained in place for the statutory 90 to 180 day lien period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not Determined
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that City Council Approve Final Tract
Map No. 24232 subject to the conditions of approval.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Development checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Conditions of Approval
Fees and Securities Report
STAFFRPT~24232.FTM
Zoning Area: Skinner Lake
Supervtsorial District: First
E.A. Number 33549
M~v'onal Team No. One
Applicant:
Engineer/Rep:
Type of Request:
Location:
CHARGE OF ZORE I10. 5392
TENTATIVE TRACT 24232
Planning Con~tsston: 10-4-89
Agenda Item No.2-1
RIVERSIDE COURTY H.AHRII~ DEPARTIEIfl'
STAFF IrEPORT
5. Extsttng Zontng:
6, Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
9. Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
10. Land Division Data:
Otx Development Inc.
CH Engineering Associates Inc.
Subdivision of 4.91 acres into 11
parcels change of zone R-A-2~ to R-1
South of Ntcolas Road, east of Calle
Medusa
R-A-2~
R-A-2~, R-A-5 and R-T
Vacant, partially mountainous
Vacant
Land Use: Category II
Density: 2-8 I)u per acre
Open Space/Cons: Areas not Designated
as open space
Total Acreage: 4.91
Total Lots: 11
DU Per Acre: 2.4
Proposed Htn. Lot Size: 7,200 square
feet
11. Agency Reconnendattons:
12.. Letters:
13. Sphere of Influence:
AMALYSIS:
See Letter Dated:
TR 24232 CZ 5392
Road: 3.06-89 8-01-89
Health: 3-23-89 3-01-89
Flood: 3-13-89 3-09-89
Fire: 2-22-89 3-21-B9
Bldg. & Safety:
Land Use: 3-31-89
Grading: 3-30-89
Opposing/Supporting: None received as
of this writing
Not wtthtn a city sphere
Project Descrlptim:
Tract No. 24232 is an application to subdivide 4.91 acres into II residential
Parcels, Change of Zone No, 5392 is an application to change the zone on the
same property from R-A-2~ to R-l,
CHANGE OF ZOME NO. 5392
TERTAfiVE TRACT RO. 24232
Staff Report
Page 2
Additionally the applicant has requested a wetvet of the lot length to width
ratio requirements on lots 8, 9, and 11 due to the slopes adjacent to the
Netropolttan Water District right of way, The project stte is located south of
Ntcolas Road and east of Calla Nedusa, in the Rancho California Area,
The project site is currently vacant, wtth the east portton of the property
bean hilly terrain. Surrounding land uses are also vacant. Further to the
sout~ Tract No. 22148, approved b the Board of Supervisors on April 19, 1988,
calls for 167 lots on 60 acres of ~and, with a mtntmum lot stze of 7,200 square
feet. The stte is currently zoned R-A-2~ and R-A-5. All other directions, to
the east, south and west are zoned R-T.
Project Conststency/Coapattbtl lty:
The project site is located in the Rancho Californta/Temecula subarea of the
Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area. Policies call for generally
Category I and II land uses with Category III land use in the outlying areas.
The project, Tract 24232 lies north of three previously approved tracts (Tract
23220, Tract 22148, and TR 18518} which call for Category II densities.
Services and facilities for improvements necessary to support Category II
development either exist or will be provided to the site. Therefore it would
be appropriate to call this a Category II site. The proposed density which is
2.24 dwelling units per acre, is within a Category II density, so therefore the
proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and compatible with
area development.
The project site also falls within the tentatively approved Southwest Area
Community Plan. The SWAP designation for the subject site is for residential
development, 2-4 dwelltng units per acre. The project density is consistent
with this SWAP designation.
Envtrormental Malysis:
The initial
study completed for Environmental Assessment No. 32358 identified
concerns; slope stability, erosion, biological resources.
resource, and Paleontologtcal Resources.
The site lies within the historical habitat range for Stephens' Kangaroo Rat, a
faderally listed endangered species. A biological survey (PDB-316) was
conducted by Howard Lee to determine the species presence, on April 5th, 1989
end again June 20th, of 1989. From the second survey active burrows in
suitable habitat for Stephens' Kangaroo rat were identified. They were located
on the north-easterly quarter of the stte. A conditions has been drafted and
f as this where K-rats are found on a
a proved by Coun_ty Counsel or cases such
s~te which is not located in a study area. That condition has been included in
this case's conditions of approval and requires that a habitat conservation
plan be in place prior to the issuance of butldtng or grading permits and that
this project comply with the HCP.
CHARGE OF ZOME RO. 5392
TEMTATIVE TRACT NO. 24232
Staff Report
Page 3
All of the other items of concern shall be mitigated as per the environmental
assessment.
FINDINGS:
Change of Zone No. 5392 is a requests to change the zone on 3.91 acres
from R-A-2~ to R-l. Tract 24232 proposes a subdivision which would create
11 lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet.
The site is located in the Rancho California Areas south of Nicolas
and east of Calley Nedusa.
3. The project is vacant. Surrounding land uses are also vacant.
Road
The property line adjacent to the north of Tentative Tract 23220, which
calls for 29 lots on g.8 acres, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square
feet.
5. Zoning on the site is R-A-2~. Surrounding zoning includes, R-A-5, R-A-2~
and R-T.
6. The project has, been designed to be in conformance with Ordinance 348 and
460.
7. The site is located within the Rancho Caltfornia/Temecula subarea of the
Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area.
8. The tentatively approved Southwest Territory Area Community
designates the site for residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre.
Plan
Environmental concerns include, slope stabiltty, erosion, biological
resources, archaeological resources and Paleontological resources. All
environmental concerns can be mitigated by the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposals are in conformance with the Comprehensive General Plan and
the tentatively approved southwest area plan.
2. The project is consistent with Ordinance 348.
3. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
OiARGE OF ZONE RO. 5392
TEITATIVE TRACT I10. 24232
Staff Report
Page 4
RECOIIIENDATIONS:
ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 33549 based
on the conclusions that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment; and,
APPROVAL of ClIAII~E OF ZONE I10. 5392,from R-A-2~ to R-1 in accordance with
Exhibit 2; and,
APPROVAL of the WAIVER of the lot length to width ratios on lots 8, 9 and 11;
and,
APPROVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT MO. 24232 subject to the conditions of approval,
and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in this staff report.
LC:bc;sc
9/26/89
RIVERSIDE ~OURTt' PLAHIIIG DEPARTHENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
~ I~F' ATIVE TRACT NO. 24232
· _
~ N ~;'ANDARD COND[TiONS
..i,/The following conditions of approval are for Tract No. 24232.
m'
~. JThe subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tract No. 24232 which action ts brought about within the time
period provided for tn California Government Code Section 66499.37. The
County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate
fully tn the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate
fully tn the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible
to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside.
3.~ The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordtnance.460, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
4. J'Thts conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
5. ~The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
6. ~*The subdivider shall submtt one copy of a sotls report to the Riverside
.County Surveyor's Office and two coptes to the Department of Bulldtng and
Safety. The report sha]l address the sotls stability and geological
conditions of the stte.
7. ~ if any grading ts proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive fading plan to the Department of Butldtng and Safety. The
plan shall comply w4th the Uniform ButTdtng Code, Chapter 70, as ended
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for tn these
conditions of approval.
TENTATXVE TRACT NO. 24232
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Depar~ent of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way.
9. i Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
lO.v The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 3-6-89, a
copy of which is attached.
11. '/Legal acce'ss as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
12. ~ All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
13./ Easements, when
utilities, etc.,
wi thin the land
conveyances shal 1
Surveyor.
required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
shall be shown on the final map if they are located
division boundary. All offers of dedication and
be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
14. ~;Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 3-23-89° a copy of which is attached.
15.~ The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control Dtstrict's letter dated
3-13-89, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an
adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance
460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Co,mnisstoner.
16. J The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire ~rshal's letter dated 2-22-89, a copy of
which ls attached.
17. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Butldtng and Safety Department: Land Use Sectton's transmittel dated
3-31-89, a copy of which is attached.
18. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outltned in the
Butldtng and Safety Department: Grading Sectton's transmittal dated
3-30-89, a copy of which is attached.
TERTATIVE 11LACT RO. 24232
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
19./Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval,
20. ~ Lots created by thts subdivision shall comply wtth the following:
a. All lots shall have a mintmum stze of 7,200 square feet gross.
c. Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with
additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in
non-corner and through lots.
d.uLots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-1 zone.
e. ~When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot
shall have. a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the uttltty easement.
f. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained tn a wed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
21. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recordatton of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requtranents outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been mat:
County Fire Department County Health Department
County Flood Control County Planning Department
County Parks Department County Airports Department
Santa Ana Ragtonal Water quallty Control Board
b~ Prior to the recordatton of the ftnal map, Change of Zone No. 5392
shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective.
Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the zone ultimately applted to the property.
TERTATZYE TRACT IK. 24232
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
23.L/Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet
(ECS} shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to
the Planning Deparbnent for review and approval. The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
24. q'he following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'County Slope Stability Report No. 117 was prepared for this
property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
25. ~The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet:
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Nount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall be from low
pressure sodium lighting systems that are shielded and oriented so as not
to shine above the horizontal plane passing through the luminare".
26. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PER/4ITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
27. For use on projects located outside SKR study areas which contain occupied
SKR habitat.
1. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit:
The Secretary of the Interior must have approved the Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan and any proposed taking of
the SKR must be in compliance with the approved Plan:
The Secretary of the Interior must have issued to the County, the
Section lO(a) Permit required by the Endangered Species Act of
lg73 and said Permit must be in effects and,
A report, prepared by a biologist permitted by the 'U.S Fish and
Wildlife Service to trap the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat for scientific
purposes, documenting the amount and quality of occupied Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat habitat subject to disturbance or destruction must
have been submitted to end approved by the Planning Director.
Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant
shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663
be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior
to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant
shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24232
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
'-~ 3. Prtor to the recordatton of the final map:
The Secretary of the Interior must have approved the Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat Habttat Conservation Plan and any proposed taking of
the SKR must be in compliance with the approved Plan:
The Secretary of the Interior must have tssued to the County, the
Section %0(a) Permit required by the Endangered Spectes Act of
1973 and sald Penntt must be tn effect; and,
c. A report, prepared by a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and
wtldltfe Service to trap the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat for scientific
purposes, documenting the amount and quality of occupied Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat habitat subject to disturbance or destruction must
have been submitted to and approved by the Planning Director.
28. / Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall
be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleontologtcal impacts. Should the
paleontologist ftnd the potential is high for impact impact to significant
resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the
excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the
paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily
dtvert, redtract or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
29. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or ftll slopes, or Individual combinations
appropriate combination of a spectal retract n ) plan, tncrease
slope ratio (i.e., 3:%), retaining walls, or/or slope planting combtried
with Irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade.
30. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terratn and exceed ten
(IO) feet tn vertical hetght shall be contour graded incorporating the
following grading techniques:
3%. / ]) The angle of the graded slope shell be gradually adjusted to the
angle of t~ natural terratn.
2) Angular foms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded wtth curves wtth radii
designed tn proportion to the total height off the slopes where
drainage and stability permtt such rounding.
TENTATIVE TRACT RO. 24232
Conditions of Approval
Page 6
4) Where cut or ftll slopes exceed 300 feet tn horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulattng fashion.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The
plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping
and irrigation to be Installed Including, but not limited to, parkway
planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard
landscaping.
33.~All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be designed
and constructed with fire retardant (Class A} roofs as approved by the
County Fire Narshal.
34. ~Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall not
be less than ten (10) feet.
35./All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet.
;'3~ ~'All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic
irrigation.
37. ~ Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety
Department, a six foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed
along north and east borders and the south borders of Parcel B. The
required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the
Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director.
38;~ All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
-~ approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal
conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control
measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the
Director of Building and Safety.
39.~/Prtor to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development/the
number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of
one-half (~) gross acre in size. Should Ordinance No. 663 by superceded
by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of
the fees required by Ordinance no. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee
required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
40./ All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy
or any use allowed by this permit.
TERTATIVE TRACT NO. 24232
Condt. ttons of Approval
Page 7
LC:bc;sc
9/26/89
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER i COUNTY
March 6, 1989
L~Ro)' D. Smoo!
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RIVERSIDE CO; IN';"'
PLaeiNING L'~P,""" -,.--r
COL~ ~DMI'~ISTR.~Tr, [ C['~TER
MAIU% ~DDIU.3S
PO BOX IOqO
I.B.T,R~ID[ C.m.U[OR%LA 92502
(714~ 787 ~554
Re: TR 24232
Schedule A - Team 1 - SMD#9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative
land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider
provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement
Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map
correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their
omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for
further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are
essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as
though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred
to the Road Commissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage
easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as
follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions,
or encroachments by land fills are allowed"· The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of
all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site.
In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article
XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the
quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of
streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities
as approved by the Road Department.
COUNTY ADHINISTRAI1VI: CZNTT,/· 4080 LEMON SlRIZT" IIVI:ISIDt, CALIJDENIA 9ZSO!
TR 24232
Mar~h G, 1989
Page 2
Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department.
Calle Katerine shall be improved within the dedicated right
of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section
A. (40'/60')
Klaren Lane shall be improved with 32 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104,
Section A. (20'30')
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805
shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
Standard knuckles shall be constructed throughout the
landdivisi'on.
Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard· Asphalt emulsion shall conform to
Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifi-
cations.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from
Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation
of the final map.
The landdivider shall post a deposit and execute an
agreement with the Metropolitan Water District prior to the
recordatlon of the map.
The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shall be in conformance with County Standard t114 of
Ordinance 461.
TR 24232
March 6, 1989
Page ~
14.
7.
9.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum
50' tangent measured from flow line.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400
and 401 (curb sidewalk).
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and
knuckles shall be 35 feet.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards. A minimum of four feet of full height
curb shall be constructed between driveways.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from
the face of curb.
The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient
public offsite rights of way to provide for
primary/secondary access road(s) to a paved and maintained
road. Said access road(s) shall be constructed in
accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B.
(32'/60') at a grade and alignment approved by the Road
Commissioner. This is necessary for circulation.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department,
a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic
signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the
time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into
with the County deferring said payment to the time of
issuance of a building permit.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope easements as approved by the Road
Department.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with PM 119/77-78, PM 31/43, PM 75/22-
23, Tent TR 23220 and Tent TR 23483.
&11 private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
1R 24232
March 3, 1989
Page 4
EB:jw
24.
Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit
district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment cf the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
Very truly ours,
Subdi vi si on Eng i neer
'COUNTY
!
DEPARTI IENT
c~,.,~ ~,- R I ~ I DE COU~ PL~ I N~ D~T
4080 Lemon Street ~iR$1DE CO' '.N~'
~I~,U,,,,. ATTN: Din Citron
RE; TRACT HAP 24232: & portion of Parcel 10 of map filed for
record zn Book P-l, Pages 44, 45 and 46 of Parcel Maps zn
the Office of the County Recorder, County of R~verside State
of California.
(11 Lots)
II<N GeNTIle
lAgill
NO'kTHI'IOADW AY
/?d0 MAII'0.UEIhTA
COLON&
li0b liOUTH I~ENA VsSTA
COrOna. Ca 111}0
Illlit
llo NORIN
NiU(T. CA 12343
el.lOt OAlifS ITREE1
INDIa. C& IS%t0 I
till Itlllell
10tie ;malEm D~
LaKE [LliNORI. CA. ll31o
WALl
I*lllll
13? ;IN~' STREET
PiemS. CA Illto
IfVllllWl
IS;O LeNDIN lieEEl
mvEeltO(, CA, tllOl
Gent lemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map
No. 24232 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and speczficat;on as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prlnts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor.
The prints shall show the internal pipe dlameter.
location of valves and flre hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in all
respects with Dtv. S, Part l, Chapter I of the
California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California, when applicable.
i111 ltlililO~ kvO.
leeme me:
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Two
Attn: Dan Cotton
Hatch 23, lg89
The plans shall be signed by s registered engineer and
voter company with the following certification: "1
certify that the design of the water system in Tract
Map 24232 is accordance with the water system expansion
plans of the Ranthe California Voter District
and that the voter service, storage and distribution
system v~ll be adequate to provide voter service to
such Tract map. This certification does not constitute
· guarantee that it viII supply voter to such tract
map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for
fire protection or any other purpose".This
certification shall be signed by s responsible official
of the voter company. _Tl~_!_Dians must be !ubmittfd_~9
the Coun~X
final ma~,
Th~s Department has a statement from Rancho California Water
D~strict agreeing to serve domestic water to each and'every
lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory
financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider.
It wZll be necessary for financial arrangements to be made
prior to the recordation of the final map.
This Department has a statement from the Eastern Hunicipal
Municipal District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The
sewer system Ihall be inltallld according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate,
along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and ~oint epecifXcations
and the size o[ the sewers at the ~unction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles.
Riverside County Planning
Page 3
Hatch 23, 1989
Attn: Dan Citron
The plans shall be signed by · registered engineer end the
sewer district with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map 24232 is in
accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the'
Eastern Municipal Municipal District and that the waste
disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the
anticipated wastes from the proposed tract Map."
must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review
)~_Jeast two weeks prior t~_~b!_£!gg!l~_for the fecordmtAgD
~£ the final ma~.
St'viii be necessary for financial arrangements to be
completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map.
Sancerely,
S~/MartXnez, EnvX~o~tal Health Specialist
Environmental Health Services
SM:tac
IV
KENNETH L,. I'DWANDS
cl~llr (NGINEER
Illl IdXlll(WT ITRI:rT
P. O. BOX T033
TeLERNON((714) 71?-lOIS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIV(RIID(, CALIItORNIA lalOZ
March 13, 1~89
Riverside 0ounty
Planning Department
Ooulty ~n/nistrative Center
Riverside, CalifDrnia
Attention: ~egional Team No. 1
Dan Carton
ladies and GentleTen:
Re: Tract 24232
This is a proposal to divide 4.91 acres fDr single f3mily busing. The prop-
erty is located in the Santa Gertrudis Valley west of Calle Medusa and south
of Nicolas ~oad.
IDts 5 and 6 receive runoff from a small weters}md to the west of the proper-
ty. These flc~s should be allowed to pass through the lots to the interior
street. A much larger watercourse with a 100 year peak flow rate of 284 cf3
traverses the nort/~estern comer of Lot 1- The tantat/ve map proposes en-
croachnent into this watercourse. This encroachment should be minimized so as
not to cause any increase in flooding crier) neighboring properties.
Follc~ing are t/~ District' s rec~,,i,endations:
1. This tract is located within t]~ limits of the MulTieta Creek/Santa
Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan fDr which drainage fees heve been
adopted by the Board. Ilrainage fees shall be lmid as set fDrth ruder
the [~u~isions of the "Rules and Regulations fDr Administration of
Area Drainage Plans", amelded Febz-~y 16, 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the ~oad Ga,s,,~ssioner as part of
the filing fDr record of the subdivision final map or parcel map,
or if the recordin~ of a final parcel map is ~ived, drainage fees
shall be paid as a conditio~ of t]~ ~aiver prior tD recording a
certificate of canpliance evidencing the waiver of the lmrcel map;
or
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a rec~,~ved af-
fidavit request/rig deferment of the paymet of f~es, the drainage
fees my be paid to tl~ Building nirector at the time of ismance
of a grading permit or building permit fDr each approved parcel,
whic}~-ver my be first obtained after the recozding of t~ s~b-
defer the f~es my not be exercised fDr any parcel w~ere grading
or structures tmve been initiated cm the parcel within the prior 3
year period, or permits fDr either activity }ave been issued ~n
tlmt ,mrcel Which re~n ective.
Riverside County
Planning Dep~r~t
Re: Tract 24232
- 2 - March 13, 1989
%
EncrDach~e~t into t]~ ~Btercourse that traverses the nort}west comer
of the property shDuld r~t cause any increase in flooding depth onto
neighboring properties.
3. Erosion ~utection s~Duld be ~o~ided fDr fill slopes subject to ero-
sive
e
Offsite storm flcws tributary to I~ts 5 and 6 should not be blocked
o~to neighboring property but accepted amite and co.veyed to an ade-
quate outlet.
Tr~ property's street and lot grading shDuld be designed in a manner
that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect
to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions,
ot]~rwise, a drainage easem~mt should be obtained from t~e affected
property c~ners fDr the release of concentrated or diverted storm
flow~. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be subnitted
to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map.
e
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and ~inal map along
with supporting bydrologic and hydraulic calculat/ons should be sub-
mitted to t]~ District via the 9Dad Department for review and approval
prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be ap-
proved prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Bob Cullen of this office
at 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
~ Lss ~
BCtbjp
RIVDLSIDE COUNTY
tiRE DEPARI'MDfT
IN COOPERA11ON wrrH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J. NG4MAN
PtsnninS&~Offic~
46-209 O, sis Stm~. Suite 405
ladio, CA 92201
(619) :}42..8896
2-22-89
Plam~&EnSinm~C~ce
4080 lemon Stm. t. $uile ! I1
Rive'skk. CA 92501
(?14) 717..6606
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTNENT
ATrN: DAN CATRON
RE: TRACT 24232
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2i") located
one. st each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant.
Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPH for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approvedby a registered civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Dept."
The required water system including fire hydrants shall b~ installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA
The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County
as shown on s map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any
building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with
the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance
546.
All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as
described in section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles
or shakes shall have a Class "B' rating and shall be approved by the Fire
Department prior to installation.
RE: TR 24232 Page 2
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit vith
the Riverside County Fire Department a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment, he may enter into a vritten agreement vith the County deferring
said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Kurt Harttrail, Fire Safety Specialist
ml
March 31, 1989
Administrative Center · '17"/'7 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Dan Carton
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Tract 24232
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall
obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-
site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant
to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348.
Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side yard
setback.
Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5'
side yard setback.
Very truly yours,
Administration (714) 682-8840, (714) 787-2020
TO=
FRDH=
RE=
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Department of Building and ~afety
Planning - File
Grading Section
'7"7z T Zqz ,Z-
ZNITIAL=
_~Please make the following a condition of approval:
a. Prior to commencing any grading exceeding 5~ cubic
~he owner o~ that property shall' obtain a grading
from the Department of Building and Safety
yards~
permit
___b. Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading
permit and approval of the rough grading shall be
obtained from the Building and Safety Department.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property
owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to
construct from the Building and Safety Department.
_ _d. Constructing
of material
permit.
a road, where greater than 50 cubic yards
is placed or movedm requires a grading
..... The Grading Section has no comment on this site
FOR FINAL GRADING PLAN - PLEASE PROVIDE I:DRMAT AND GRADING
INFORMATION PER COJNTY GRADING K)M: 284-86
284-21
· 284-120
284-46 (A.C. Paving)
ee~-13~
T~A~T
Connents
· /s,>/~t zoo_..
Initial
trey'.
Fo:4,.i s e/..c.
DATE:' February 8o 1989
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Ouda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
RiVER)iDE COUnt,u
PLA~~i~G DEPA:tClTIE E
Rancho Calif Water Co
Southern California Edison
Southern Cali forni a Gas
General Telephone
Cal Trans #8
Elsinore Union High School District
Temecula Union School District
Eomni ss i one r B res son
EaStern Municipal Water District
Valleywide Park & Rec
C.J. Crotinger
Community Plans
TRACT 24232 GE Or ZONE 5392~-
(Tm-1) - E.A. J3549 - D~x Development
Inc. - C. N Engineering Assoc - Skinner
Lake Area - First Supervisorial District
- S of Nicolas Rd E. of Calle t~eduoa -
R-A-2 1/2 Acres - 4.91 Acres into 11 lots
- Schedule A - No Waiver - CONCURRENTLY
CZ-5392 - REQUEST Divide 4.91 Acres into
11 parcels - Mod 119 - A.P. 914-310-048
~ A-Z ~ 'h) ~- I Ctl :- '!: · -. ~'~
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Oiviston Coem~tttee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for Fek,..,Jl,~13, 1989. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
Your comments and reconvnendattons are requested prior to i,b, ua,) ~J, 1989 in order that
we My include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do. not hesitate to contact
Dan Carton at 787-1363.
Vllnner
C,13111LITS:
DATE: S 1 GNATURE
~ ,L'~J( r. kM. ....m. _.al klklm
~80 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
DATE: February 8, 1989
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Duda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
RiVE=I iDE courl;Y
-PLAnninG DEPAR IilEFIF,
Rancho Cal i f Water Co
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
General Telephone
Cal Trans #8
Elsinore Union High School District
Temecula Union School District
Eomnissioner Bresson
Eastern Municipal Water District
Valleywide Park & Rec
C..J. Crotinger
Coffmnunity Plans
TRACT 24232C~HANGE OF ZONE 5392~-
(Tm-1) - E.A. J3549 - Olx Development
Inc. - C. M Engineering Assoc - Skinner
Lake Area - First Supervisorial District
- S*of Nicolas Rd E. of Calle ~duoa -
R-A-2 1/2 Acres - 4.91 Acres into 11 lots
- Schedule A - No Waiver - CONCURRENTLY
CZ-5392 - REQUEST Divide 4.91 Acres into
11 parcels - Mod 119 - A.P. 914-310-f
~a-Z~ -l'e 12-1 cn ~.',~-~-.'~
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Lane
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
Your comnents and reconmnendattons ere requested prior to f.b,.=,/~j, 1989 in order thai
we may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do. not hesitate to contact
Dan Catron at 787-1363.
vlmnner
COeqEMT$:
DATE: SIGNATURE
~ ,L,t.C,:'j,."mFRqlllRllllq.._' :'.~,-.,rt l
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STkEET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Count.y of Riverside
· RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLAnNInG DEPT.
DATE:
~tarch 1, 1989
ATTN' Dan Carton
rag Dellenbach. Environmental Health Specialist
CHANGE OF ZONE 5392
Environmental Health Services has reviewed this change
of zone case and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and
water services are available in this area.
GD:tac
'O P, M 4. (Paw. 1/87)
(;Hit
BOX 103:-
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning L)epartr..ent
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional leam No.
r V,,-,,/
Area ~
Re :. ('~. ,5'3
Ue have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisence nature local 'runoff ~:hich ma3 travc:'se pot!ions :T t:'...
prb~..erty the project is considered free from ordin:ry storm Fl~,nd t,azc~rd.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause soh~c dalnago. New co; st,'uc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural
courses which traverse the property. lhere is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natu,'al ~vatercourses should L,:
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natur~.l
drainaUe patterns of the area and to p,'evcnt flood da:'.age to ne~.7 buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraini sheet stating, "All nc'..:
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the fini,:,hed floors a minir,::- o:
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be providcd
for mobi 1 e home supports."
lhis project is in the . ATca
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rules and
regul at i on s.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Sense f'mo,~d
'control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
imp! ied ds'.~sit.v.
lhe District's report dated
is still current for this project.
lhe District does not object to the proposed minor change.
The attached comments apply.
CC:
Very truly yours,
KENNElH L. EDWARDS
· ' r Civil Engineer
DATE:
DALE: February 8. 1909
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor - Dave l)uda
Road Department
Health -Ralph, Luchs
~ re: P~otec t I oh
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.5. Fish & Wildlife Services
:IiVE:DiDF- coun _u
PLAIIllilIG
Rancho Calif Water Co
Southern Ca1 i f,,rn ia F. dison
Southern Calif,~m'mmia (jas
Gem,era) le Ic, l,lmone
Ca ! 1 rans UR
Elsinore U,,iu,, !ligh School Uistrtct
le~cula Ilnlnme School I)iStrict
{o~n t s s i one r O m-e s s on
Eastern Hunicil~al Water Uistrict
Valleywide Park & Rec
C.,). Crotinger
Connuni ty Plans
rTRACT 24232tCHANG[ OF ZONE 5392 -
(1m-1) - E.A. 33549 - Dtx Development
Inc. - C. M Engineering Assoc -'Skinner
Lake Area - First Supervtsorial l)i~trtct
- S of Nicolas Rd E. of Calle Heduoa -
R-A-2 |/2 Acres - 4.91 Acres into 11 lots
- Schedule A - No Waiver - CONCURRENTLY
CZ-5392 - REQUEST Divide 4.91 Acres into
II parcels - Hod ll9 - A.P. 914-3|0-048
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for Ireb, u.ry J; 1989. if it
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
Your con~nents and recommendations are requested prior to F-t, rua~ ~, lgBg in order that
we may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item. please do not hesitate to contact
Oan Catron at 787-1363.
~lanner
C011~ENTS:
PI"F;I~.,'~ rn, ,, ,' ,
I'll .I! I. .;.".~
The Riverside County F~re DepartmrJ~i~
hem no comment or condittona.
I L
tl E l; E I V E Em
DATE: 2-21-89
SIGNATURE
- ~cthSe m., hvi ,,.,,,: .,,d -ttlll.
4090 I.EMON STREET. g"' FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 9250 ~
1714) 787-e~e~
Furt Nantvell, [,1re hfetv SpmclaZtmt
46.209 OASIS STREE1, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL LETTER
i...
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Nay 5, 1989
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Ktm Johnson - Team 1 ~_
Steven A. Kupferman o Engineering Geologist
Tentative Tract No. 24232
Slope Stability Report No. 117
The following report has been revtewed relative to slope stability at the
subject tract:
"Geotechntcal Report for Proposed Subdivision Consisting of 11 Single Famtly
Homes, within the 4.91 Acre Parcel Described as Tentative Tract 24232," by
South Coast Geologic Services, dated April 24, 1989.
This report determined that:
Cut and fill slopes are planned at ratios of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical)
with maximum proposed slope heights on the order of 32 and 30 feet
respectively.
Factors of safety of at least 1.5 for static conditions and 1.1. for
seismic loading were determined for proposed slopes. These are
cormonly accepted factors of safety against instability.
3. Cut slopes tn older a11uvtum with favorable geologic conditions are
expected to be stable against deep seated and surftcial instability.
4. The alluvial soils are subject to eroston.
This report recmnended that:
Grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the geotechntcal
engineer prior to the start of grading for review of geotechntcal
aspects.
Ftli slopos my be graded at 2:1 or less. The keyway to be constructed
at the toe of slopes shall be at least 15 feet ~de, 2 feet deep at the
toe, and 3 feet feet deep at the heel of the key. The keyway ts to be
excavated tnto firm older alluvtum as approved by the project
geologist.
Kim Johnson - Team I -2- ~y 5, 1989
Fill slopes shall be either over-filled at least 6 feet and trimmed
back to a firm surface or shall be compacted at design grade during
construction, The outer %0 feet of fill slopes shall consist of a
cohesive sot1,
4. Proposed permanent cut slopes may be graded at 2:1 and shall be made
under observation of the project geologist,
Terrace dratns shall be provtde per the latest Uniform Butldtng Code.
A compacted fill berm shall be placed at the top of all ftll slopes
Drainage shall be directed,away from the slopes, A paved terrace drain
shall be provided at the top of all cut slopes,
Newly constructed slopes or existing slopes where vegetation is not
sufficient or has been damaged due to construction shall be planted as
soon as possible with a deep rooted ground cover requiring a minimum of
irrigation. Burrowing rodents shall be actively discouraged.
This report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope stability
report. The recommendations made in this report shall be adhered to in the
design and construction of this project.
SAK:al
Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District
901 West Emplenade Avenue
P. O. Box 907
San Jacimo. California 92383
Telephone {714) 654-1505
March 13, 1 989
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Attention: Dan Catron
RE: Tract 24232/Change of Zone 5392
RIVERSIDE COL. ~,;'r,,
PLANNING DEPAF-, ·
We would like to call your attention to the following with respect
to the above referenced parcel/tract number:
"Prior to issuance of building permits, the fee of $ To Be Determined
per dwelling unit must be paid to Valley-Wide Recreation and
Park District."
In the event the building permits have already been issued, please
do not issue the occupancy permit until these fees have been paid.
We appreciate your assistance in helping us receive the required fees.
Sincerely,
Samue,.~~W.d~o 1 Nanager
~lle) and Park District
SWG:ps
cc: Kay Ceniceros
doe Tronti, Riverside County Building Dept.
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRI~'T OY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
RECi~IVED
APR 4
MWD San Diego Pipelines
Nos. 3, 4, and 5
Sta. 1347+00 to 1365+00
~/W ~42-3-1 (fee)
R/W SDA-P-3 13 (easement)
W.O. 7-6387
C. M. Engineering Associates, Inc.
Post Office Box 6087
San Bernardino, California 92412
Attention Mr. Tom T. Fujiwara
Gentlemen:
Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 23220, 23483 and 24232
Thank you for your Transmittal Form dated November 23,
1988, your letter dated December 14, 1988, and Transmittal Form
dated January 6, 1989, sending one set of prints of the Rough
Grading Plans, Sheets I and 2 for Tract No. 23220 and Sheets 1
through 4 for Tract No. 23483s Storm Drain Plans, Sheets 1
through 6 for Tract No. 23220 and Sheets I through 3 for Tract
No. 23483~ an exhibit showing the location of the proposed
street crossing in Tract No. 23483; and a check in the amount of
$3,000 from J. & L. Properties to apply towards the cost of
engineering review of your plans. We acknowledge receipt of two
form letters from Continental Land Title Company dated October
3, 1988, and January 4, 1989, concerning Tracts Nos. 23220 and
23483. Also, we acknowledge receipt of one set of prints of the
Sewer Plans, Sheet 4 for Tract No. 23220 and Sheet 4 for Tract
No. 23220, and Water Plans, Sheet 4 for Tract 23220 and Sheet 5
for Tract No. 23483, during a meeting between Messrs. Tom
Fujiwara of C. M. Engineering, Brent Dix of Dlx Engineering,
Inc., and Marc Weinberger and Ron Redd of Metropolitan on
February 14, 1989.
The locations of Metropolitan's rights-of-way as shown
on Vesting Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 23220 and 23483 are sub-
stantially in agreement with our records. Bowever, on Tract Map
No. 23483, our right-of-way along the easterly boundary of the
tract must be identified as being Metropolitan's efee property,'
~heMel~poli~nWaterDistn~ dSou~emCali~mia
C. M. ~ngineeri~g
Associates, Inc. - 2 -
IqAR 3 ~ 1989
and the official record data must be shown. Further, Tract Map
No. 23220 must show the northwest and southwest corners of the
parcel tied to the monuments set per survey of Parcel 10 of
Parcel Map 1/44-46 per records of Riverside County, copy attached.
Also, record data must be shown on the map, and our 70-foot-wide
right-of-way must be shown as being "fee property." We require
that Metropolitan's full name be written on both tract maps as
"The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California."
Attached for your use are Metropolitan's Right-of-Way Maps
Nos. 142-3 and SDA-P-3, and a copy of P.M. 1/44-46. We require
that both final tract maps be submitted for our review and
approval prior to recording.
Also, the location of Metropolitan's rights-of-way as
shown on Tentative Tract Map No. 24232 is substantially in
agreement with our records. Mowever, both our 70-foot-wide fee
property and our 50-foot-wide easement should be identified by
their book and page numbers. Enclosed for your use is a copy of
our Right-of-Way Map No. 142-3. Also, our right-of-way should
be shown continuing through Calls Katefine Lane. Please submit
the final tract map, grading, and all improvement plans for
Tract No. 24232 for our review and approval.
We have reviewed the improvement plans and find that
they are acceptable to Metropolitan subject to the following
comments and requirements:
1. The street crossing of Metropolitan's rights-
of-way as shown on the Street Improvement Plans for Tracts
Nos. 23220 and 23483 is acceptable. However, we require
that Sheet 7 of the Street Plans for Tract No. 23220 show
and clearly label our fee property and easement.
2. Metropolitan's San Diego Pipelines 3, 4, and 5
are adequate for AASHTO H-20 loading provided that the
cover is not less than 4 feet or greater than 15 feet.
However, if the contractor plans to use any equipment over
Metropolitan's pipelines which will impose loads greater
than AASHTO B-20, it will be necessary to submit the
specifications of such equipment for our review and
approval at least one week prior to its use.
3. We require that 16-foot-wide commercial-type
driveway approaches be constructed on both sides of all
streets crossing Metropolitan's rights-of-way. Access
ramps, if necessary, must be at least 16 feet wide. Grades
of ramps are normally not allowed to exceed 10 percent. If
~heMet~poliMnWalerDist~ dSou~emC~li~mia
C. ~. ~ngineering
Associates, Inc. - 3 -
HAR 3 !
the slope of an access ramp must exceed 10 percent due to
the topography, the ramp must be paved. We require a
20-foot-wide level area on the driveway approach to access
ramps where the ramp meets the street.
4. Your plans show that storm water as well as
nuisance water from landscaping, irrigation, car washing,
and other outdoor domestic water uses will flow into the
storm drainage system and onto Metropolitan's right-of-way,
resulting not only in erosion but also in weed abatement,
insect infestation, obstructed access, and other problems.
Therefore, the storm drain, as shown on Sheet 5 of the
Storm Drain Plans for Tract No. 23220, is unacceptable.
However, to accommodate our requirements, Mr. Fujiwara
proposed to continue the storm drain across our right-of-
way in a closed conduit pipe, which is acceptable to
Metropolitan. We require that revised plans be submitted
for our approval. Further, we require that the 72-inch RCP
Storm Drain, as shown on Sheet 6 of 8 of the Storm Drain
Plans for Tract No. 23483, be extended across our fee
property and easement.
5. Concrete drainage swales, designed for a minimum
capacity of 35 cfs shall be constructed to convey the water
discharged from Metropolitan's blow-off structures to the
proposed storm drains located in Tract No. 23483. However,
since Metropolitan must maintain access along its rights-
of-way and its pipeline facilities, to ensure their safety
and proper maintenance, we require that the swales be
designed to accommodate Metropolitan's patrol road crossing
and that the swales at the crossings be designed for AASHTO
H-20 loading.
6. Two toe drains, as shown on Sheet 2 of your Rough
Grading Plan for Tract No. 23220, will discharge water onto
our right-of-way in two locations. First, at the northerly
boundary of the tract in Lot 29, and second, near the down
drain in Lot 24. Zf water must be discharged onto
Metropolitants fee property and easement, Metropolitan will
insist that plans for development provide that it be
carried across our right-of-way in a closed conduit or
lined open channel approved in writing by Metropolitan.
Also, the drainage facilities must be maintained by others.
Further, we require that the toe drain be located outside
of our right-of-way.
7. Metropolitan requires that the developer construct
a concrete lined brow ditch and/or toe drain along the
boundary of Tract No. 23483 and Metropolitan's fee property
~eMef~poliMn W~lerDisf~ ~Sou~emC~li~mia
C. ~. [ngineeri~g
Associates, Inc. - 4 -
to intercept any drainage flow from our property and
discharge it into the storm drain system.
8. We require a splash block be located on the toe
drain at the bottom of the emergency drainage swale shown
on Sheet 2 of the Rough Grading Plan for Tract No. 23220.
9. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23220 indicates a
storm drain within a 20-foot-wide easement between Lots 23
and 24. However, Sheet 5 of the Storm Drain Plans and
Sheet 2 of the Rough Grading Plans indicate a storm drain
within a 24-foot-wide easement between Lots 24 and 25.
Please revise the plans to show the actual location of the
storm drain and its easement.
10. The Water and Sewer Plans for Tracts Nos. 23220
and 23483 are acceptable since Sheet 4 of your Water Plan
for Tract No. 23220 indicates that the proposed 8-inch
waterline will cross over our San Diego Pipelines No. 3, 4,
and 5 with approximately 8, 1, and 5 feet of vertical
clearance, respectively. Also, Sheet 4 of the Sewer Plan
for Tract No. 23220 indicates that the proposed 8-inch
sewer will cross over our pipelines with approximately 5,
2, and 3 feet of vertical clearance, respectively. We note
that the sewerline at the overcrossing of our pipelines
will be encased in concrete.
11. Mr. S. M. Chavez, Director of Metropolitan's
Right of Way and Land Division, must be contacted concerning
the rights for the street and storm drain facilities across
Metropolitan's property. Maps and legal descriptions of
the required easement must be submitted, along with written
evidence that the County will accept the easement for
street and utility, and storm drain purposes into its
public system. The grant of the easement will be subject
to Metropolitan's rights to use its land for water pipelines
and related purposes to the same extent as if such grant
had not been made. Also, there will be a charge for the
easement. Please note that an entry permit must be
obtained for any grading purposes or for any construction
of the street, utility, or storm drain improvements before
issuance of the easements.
'7heMetm;x>litanWaterDistri~ dSourhernCali~mia
C. M. Engineering
Associates, Inc. - 5 -
Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's easements
shall be subject to the paramount right of Metropolitan to use
the easements for the purpose for which they were acquired. If
at any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the exercise
of their rights, find it necessary to remove any of the facilities
from the easements, such removal and replacement shall be at the
expense of the owner of the facility.
We request that a stipulation be added to the plans or
specifications for notification of Ms. Julia Lie of our
Operations Services Branch, telephone (213) 250-6727, at least
two working days prior to any work in the vicinity of our
facilities.
We advise you that this response is based upon
information available to the Metropolitan Water District which
was prepared by or on behalf of Metropolitan for general record
purposes only. Such information may not be sufficiently
detailed or accurate for your purposes. No warranty of any
kind, either express or implied, is attached to the information
herein conveyed as to its accuracy, and no inference should be
drawn from Metropolitan's failure to comment on any aspect of
your project. You are therefore cautioned to make such surveys
and other field investigations as you may deem prudent to assure
yourself that any plans for your project are correct.
Should you require additional information, please
contact Mr. Ron Redd, telephone (213) 250-6025.
Very truly yours,
Charles E. Nichols
Chief Engineer
RRR/lk
Encl. 25735
Dix Development, Inc.
22865 Lake Forest Drive
E1 Toro, California 92630
Attention Mr. Brent Dix
The Metmpoli~n Water DistH~ d.~ou~em Cali~mia
C. M. Engineering
Associates, Inc. - 6 -
cc:
Riverside County
Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Ninth Floor
Riverside, California
92501
Riverside County
Road Department
Commissioner and Surveyor
Halls of Records
Post Office Box 1090
Riverside, California 92501
Riverside County
Flood Control and
Water Conservation District
Post Office Box 1033
Riverside, California 92502
Continental Land Title Company
1605 Spruce Street
Riverside, California 92507
Attention Ms. Debi Bright
Ms. Kathy Littman
'VE dDE county
PLAnrkn DEPArCnEB
APPLICATION FOR LAND UIE AND DEVELOPMENT
INC{)MPtETE APPLC. ETK)NI WIlL NOT BE ad:~EPTED
1. tlmlmi~teldeme
Ml,q t~lOfess
Dtx Blvelolaent, Inc.
22865 Lake Forest Drive [1 Toro Elk
J I L ~oNrttes
( 714
C N En~t~erln9 ltsoc4ates. Inc.
( 714 ) 184-88N
92~33
924]2
4.91 acres
40 G0 LIB ITIISET.
I~VTRIIDE. CALiFC)IIN;a
f?md)
41,~01 0AIJI ITI~ET. ROCW
IIDiC). CALiF01tNI&
II1tl 342.82??
IIa~F UII C}NI.v "
ENYIRONMINTAL INFORMA T)ON FORM
elmmmmmmmlmmM~lnmlmmmmlmNmNmWmmmmmm. mmmammmm~lm~m FM~m~m~mm~
1. lmm~tMhi~MmepPmke~ 4.91 acres.
I 1lllmml almlwm, md~Ymm, ~K~Immtlm lm lmmmm m9 II1~
Mmm0 Im tq ~. 1~78 emmmm Mmm Zmm Mm. mU
tArt0 IM!mmm0 il~k
1.1mlMlmmlmmm,e~' 'P~ImemtllkdlmZemt tl80
$memmllmmmlmilm~mlemmmmMmZmm~mmmNIMkb.~,.
Imlmmm~~mm, m~m~.m_~ :~m~mmm~~.-
t ~mmm~a~em~mmtmxm~m~m~s.m,mmmmm~.-
TmememmmfFemtmmmm~tmmmam~mmmeeWe;cMmmrmmmmemmmmtmsmmmdmmmlemm,m:Sm~lf~w~
Iftm nmmtoMmmm, el ~m"Yoe~'mmmm~e,emf
Immmmmm~memlmmlm, M~mmlmmmmmemlw.f~.~'m,bm11~mmP~,mmmllmmm.
iflm~lm, l~IM11~t~mmlaMiMIiI. Mmm~lhmlled~,.,;,~D~fiMil~lheM~ll~~r~k~l4 ....
4. mmue~e, mm,,,,,mmmemmeme,mm, Mec, tmmu9 'l'!l:l
I'Ne~'MmmtmmmaltheemeWk~tmelmmse~t0MM9
Wmf~mmmmm
~ mmmmm~mm*.
mBmmummmm'dmmmOmmmmmmmm'r WJI ~ODD
ft6.°MmmmllmrmdgmmIM86JbeemededlelMglmmi~
mmHmmmmmmmmm
$mmmmmmm~ -:
MIIl:AimmmllMmM
btmlmmmmSBmmmmtmMmINmtmm:
t mmmmmmealmmemmm~m~ rammmmmemWmmmmm~wmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~-~, ~
memmmmm~:
· 11mlmmlmWmmmddl~elm~A~, P. mmllm
· 1Mmmmlmefmmm~A1~ U~
IillmwlA k- Imkbammmbrlaglleflet. I)m"A Jmmlmmlllmlll,.:le_' _' 'km,mir,k,r'#~mimm&k
IMmlttll 'd' ~ llBIMMImm~lmmtlllllmml
J. mmm~.tmtltmmm i__~ ' 'mmmiMImmdlNtmmmmetmmmmemmmmmmmmtmmemm~
Glry to~ntz, Plmnmmr, C · E tnee,'t~m'
aliVEraDii :. COUntY
PL~nni~ pg~mraTEn~
APPLICA ?'ION FOR LAWD UIE AND DEY/LOPMIAff'
m: CX,mm'L rll &m'me. eC, A1'~C~i WII, L IOT I( I~C;!IrrI D
LIke FOreSt D~he [1 ?oro
PriNtties
95~-1)~1 film-JIm,
leeavsl Between LI kreM III) Ind kicolls Io1¢, te RlsChO CalifOrnia.
41.IDI Oald$ rml~. ~ 3~x
INDID. GIkLFOINI,
111,
EA NO
5TA~I~ USE
ENVIRONMENTAl, INFORMATION FORM
Im~lse complete I~lrll, I I~q0 If 0e thtl IDfm If10 Df(W~e ITI {~ ~ I~(~rhDMI mle~ltl r~u4,wleO
~ 10 C~IIC~ tM ~leRl~ DeM~NRI It l?141787~18
PART I: GeHml I~formmion
q ~1~t~o~Ac~l~m~Oq 4.9~ lores.
2 IS t~re I ~vsM I~lGtsOe fl~ IF N MN Ine~ ~5: NO 3
~ENO P. M. N0, 1207E (~l~f~ZWCM~mc.I
~ NO n K~. !m NO (I ~)
3 Id~f~mml~Y~htoWY~
2 It IM ~o~ct I~te~ wdhm I MZIrO ~M~eNnl IO~ ~ ~vfflCt~ I~1 It I~ ~
~1 Tec~n~ ee~*'~ ~ S: NO 3
10 ~le~,~ ~ you~ FMCI l I~C~ 10 1~ ~0~ ~ZI'Ol ~e0 ~ ~ I~V~ ~nlv~ ~ "~,l--.: Sl*e' ~ i 51' e',
H the i~lwe~ IC agewho- e2 el 'vii Coqllct s~ I~r~rate Ge~lphsc ~l.n,~ TN~ ~,o~ l00,lc~lt l: ~'::' i'~
3 if~v, FMc1~,.l~e~le~lrel Sdwdh'~tPl~qo~l~l~el9 ~S: N02
TN DiI~R,RG ~,ces ,P inO.c IRe R,~l~ wd. Dr0vee y0v w,th I~fOrqtaO~ ConCem,~g ~;~-0 ~l'ot · :. P,I · L~:
4 IS wile' H~CI Ivl,ll~*e r me p'o~:~ I,It~ YES } NO;
Numb' Of IH~ Or
'NO.* how tar mat ~ diet ~l) N e~e~ ~ ~ ~
/ II. Pl~wtrtlll
RIVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH R, OOR
4080 LEMON STREET
RZVERSZDE, CALIFORNZA 92501-3657 '
Roger S. Streeter, Planntng Dtrector
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING C(II~ISSlON to
· consider the application(s) described below. The Planntng Department has
tentatively found that the proposed proJect(s) will have no significant
en~tromental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s).
The Planning Commission will consider whether or not to adopt the negative
declaration along with the proposed project at this heartng.
Place of Hearing: Board Ram, ]4th Root, 4080 Leon Street, Riverside, CA
Date of Hearing: WEI)NESDAY, OCTOBER 4o 1989
The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below.
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Department before the
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption
of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Con~nission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The enviromental
finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public
information counter Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m.
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 5392 WITH TRACT MAP NO. 24232, EA '33549 is an application
submitted by Dtx Development, Inc. for property located in the Skinner
Lake Area and First Supervisorial District and generally described as
south of Ntcolas Road, east of Calle Medusa to mend Ordinance No.
348, Riverside County Land Use Ordinance. Said anen~ent would change
R-A-2~ (Residential Agriculture with a 2~ Acre mintram lot size) to
R-1 (Single Fmtly Residential) Or other such zones as the Planning
Canmntsston may find appropriate to divide 4.91~ acres into 11 lots
TIJ[ OF HEARING: 9:30 a.a.
914-300-058
r,rol Anderson
.... Moore
. O. Box 324
Murrieta, CA 92362
914-300-058
Carol Anderson
John Noore
P. O. Box 324
Murrteta, CA 92362
914- 300-06O
914-300-060
Leonard Wiebe
6490 ~ntova
Long Beach, CA 90815
914-310-012
Leonard Wiebe
6490 Kantova
Long Beach, CA
914-310-012
90815
J & L Properties
22865 Lake Forest Drive
E1Toro,';CA 92630
914-310-046
J-& L Properties
~2865 Lake,Forest Drive
E1Toro, CA 92630
914-310-046
Robert and Larraine OCanna
P. O. Box 615
Nurrfeta, CA 92362
914-310-047
Robert and Larratne OCanna
P. O. Box 615
Iqurrieta, CA 92362
914-310-047
Peter mnd Gabriella Giovannoni
"~4 W. Alcomar Ave
~"-- ,aim, CA 92804
914-310-049
Peter end Ga~rtella Gtovannon(
1784 W. Alcomar Ave
Anahetm, CA 92804
914-310-049
J & L Properties
22865 Like Forest Drive
E1Toro, CA 92630
LJ & L Properties
22865.Lak-~Torest Drive
'El loro, CA 92630
C M ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Dtx OevelopMnt, Inc.
P. O. Box 6087 22865 Like Forest Drive
San Bernardtno, CA 92412 E1Toro, CA 92630
914-300-058
Carol Anderson
John Moore
P. O. Box 324
Nurrieta, CA 92362
914-300-060
Leonard Wtebe
6490 Kantova
Long Beach, CA
914-310-012
90815
J & L Properties
22865 Lake Forest Drive
:l Toro, CA 92630
914-310-046
Robert and Larraine OCanna
P. O. Box 615
Murrleta, CA 92362
914-31 0-047
Peter end Gabriella Giovannoni
1784 W. Alcomar Ave
Anahetm, CA 92804
914-310-049
J & L Properties
'22865 Lake Forest Drive
E1Toro, CA 92630
C M Engineering Associates, Znc Dlx Development, Inc.
P. O. kx 6087 ZZ865 Lake Forest Drive
San Bernardlno, CA 92412 El Toro, CA 92630
C M Engineering Associates, Znc
P. O. Dex 6087
San krMrdino, CA 92412
Dtx Development, lnc
22865 Lake Forest Dr.
El Toro, CA 92630
Engineering Associates, %nc
~. O. Box 6087
San Bernardino, CA 92412
Dt~ Development, Inc.
22865 Lake Forest Dr.
E1 Toro, CA 92630
:IEVE:L DE county
'Pl.&~nilx; DEP4RCmEnE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: STANDARD EVALUATION
ENV1R,C)NMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBE.,~. ' MODULE NUMBER(s):
PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(s): "-/' ~ ,.. T ,~, -,/2 _g~_. (~ 2. S' .k"
APPLICANT'S NAME: --'~- ~ "' L~ ~> / c:/.~ ~ rr (-~ r, ,,L' ,,/~ :- .
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E.A.: ,,~.,,,h~/ c/' .,,F "/',,: iv' //,, ./,(..,d. / ,.-,
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESCRIPTION (itclucle pro(xased minimum Jot e~ze end lees is ippliceble): "';'/(: :' ~"
,,~/:,:~.,_~.,~.c,./~-~,r,'.,,_,.. .' ~,">'~.?' -"~" ''''/~':'(.~-".: '; -" ,~'.
/ --:,. .'.-r.
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ; or SQUARE FED
/
C. ASSESSOWS PARCEL NO.(s): -"' ""' :~ '- ' "': "'
/,~.- -? _ -~ ,
D, EXISTING ZONING: - 2_ IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
E. PROPOSED ZONING: ~" / IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFOBMANCE?
,' : " , ; ~ ,-~ ,,
F. ST~iEET REFERENCES: '-' ,3 -/', , ...z' ,) ' ... ,., ,,..:.' .. . .
.-..A ' ~ ~ .~,_..:. ,,-,: '
.G.
SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
~' 'T./..~ .~ ? t,~,'
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS
/ . .
I. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN 8PACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check the mpproprimte option(s) below and p~or. Jed mccordinghy.
I'1 All or part of the project site is in "Adopted Specific Ptans," "REMAP" or "Rlncho Villages Community
Policy Areas". Complete Sections III, N (B end C only), V end Vi.
IZ~.AII or DIrt of the project mite il it "Areas Not Designated Is Open Spice", Complete Sections III, I
(A, B end D only). V Ind VI.
[3 M or DIrt of the project erie has en ~ SDece end ConservNion clesignltion Other thin those rnentior~ec~
ebove. Complete Sections III, N (A, B, Ir~ E only), V end VI.
.... I III. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
A. Indicate !he nlture Of Ihe proposed lind use as delern'~nld lrom ~ delcrlptionl II found In ~sive Ger~ral Pin Figure
Vt.3 (CIrcle One). This ;;~;r.w'mltion II necetl/ry to liltermine ~ Ippropriltl lind ull ii,litlbility rltjngl In Section III.B.
NA - Not Appliclble Crltlcll Ellentill Normi-Hlgh Rllk Normel-Low Risk
B. IndicNe with s yes (Y) or no (N) whether any ernHronmenlal hazard end/or resoume isaac my significantly effect or be sfiecte cI
by the WOGOII!. NI rwfwerced figures m'e contlined In ere Co,,q;yihlnlNe 134wlrld Fqln. For any illue mlrked yes (Y) write
lddltiOrtlJ dltl IourcN,, Igenclel cortlulted, ~ndir~gl Of flct Ind any mftigltion riteSure uriClet Section V. Alto, where indicated
cede the eppropr~te ~ ue suitebaH,/or noise eoceptabllty mires). (See deidtiorm et bottom Of mie page).
HAZARDS
1 ,/" ' Aicluist-Fh'iolo Special Studies or County FluIt
lizard Zones (Fig. VI.1 )
~u ~ t~U R (Fig. %/!.3)
2, '- efact Poten Zone (Fig. V!.1)
L.N.A S PS U R (Fig. VI.4)
8. ~,
g. A/
10.
11..~.
NN~ndshaking Zone (Fig V!,I )
S PS U R (Fig. VI.5)
Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps)
Lindslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 ScAJe
Seismic Maps or On-sHe Inlpection)
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Rockfall Hlzard (On-site Inspection)
ExDansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service Soil Surveys)
Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservltion
Service Soil Surveys)
Wind Ersosion & Blowland (Fig. VIA,
Offi. 460, Sac. 142, l Ord. 484)
DIm Inundation Area (Fig. Vl.7)
F.J~xIplNns (Fig. VI.7)
NAt' U R (Fig. VI.8)
12. A' Airport Noise (Fig. l|.18.5,11.18.11
&._y!,12 & 1984 AICUZ Repod, M.A.F.B.)
L...NA/ A S C D (Fig, VI. 11 )
13. P, jlroad Noise (Fig. V1.13- V1.16)
~ ~.wlA] B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
14. f Noise (Fig. VI.17 - VI.29)
[NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
15. -~ 13t'~erNoise
NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
16. Project Generlted Noise Affecting
Noise Sefilitive Ules (Fig. VI.11 )
17. Noise Senlitive Project (Fig. VI.11 )
18. ', Air Qullity Impacts From Project
19." Project Sefilitive to Air Quality
20. , Witer Qullity Impacts From Project
21. '. Pro~ct Sefteitive to Water Quality
22. "', Hazardous Materials end Wastes
23. ' HIz. ardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - Vl.31 )
25. Olher
#
26.~
27. r%
RESOURCES
,j Contract MN~) ._,y_ (Fig. %/I.32 - Vl.33 & %/I.46- Vl.46)
28. ' Wildli~ (Fig. VI.36 - VI.37) 35 P,,~sonl01ogicll Resources
29. ~,: Weetauon (Fig. V1.38- VI,40) ONeontologk~ Resources Map)
· 30,/%: Mineral Re~ouroee (Fig. VI.41 - VL42) 35. Oete
31. ~' EneW Resource (Fig. %/I.43 - VI.44) 37..__. Olher
32. ~ "' Scenic I.lighweys (Ir~. vl.45)
3,3, A, HiltoHc Relourcel (Fig. V1.32- VI.33)
34. '// Archaeological Resources
Definitions for Lend Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - Not Appllcable S - Generdy Suitable PS - ProviBiormlty Suitable
U - Gef~llly Uneuttabie R - Reetricted A · ~lly Acceptable
B · Conditionally Acceptable C - Gerberlily ~ceplble D · LInd ~ Dilcourlged
A. Complete this part unless the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REMAP" or "Pancho
Villages Community Policy Areas."
OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(e): "~'~4j.%' '~,'C. '7'-
~, ~ 0 -~ ~,~ ~' ~,~ C*C .,
LAND USE PLANNING AREA: .~'C.' c. Jb ~:t, ~"d" ,/L- '7',4~ ';, ~-_ ~' r ,:.,,/.
SUBAREA, IF ANY: -
COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY:
COMMUNrTY PLAN. IF ANY: .r,, ~.~ ~, :::.,~Lr.~z 6//," "'~,.'L C ,~. --.; ~
COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY: 2. -- J' ~'¢Z,'C'/" ~- ,.p , ."7 ;--.- '
e.C/.~. F '
7. SUMMARY OF POLICIES AFFECTING PROPOSAl;
Be
For Ill projects, inidcate with · yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may significantly effect
or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Ptan. For eny issue
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consumed, findings of fact, end mitigation measures under Section V
, PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
1../~ Circulation (Fig. IV.l-IV.l.1, Discuss in 10, Y
Sec. V biting, Planned & Required Roads)
Bike Trails (Fig. N.12 - N.13)
Water (Agency Letters)
Sewer (Agency Lettee)
Firs Services (F~, N.16- N.18)
Bherffi ,Services (Fig N.11 - N.18)
~lx}ois (Fig. N.11 - N.18)
8olk:l Wiste (Ir~}. N. 17 - NAb)
Pmrk~ ~ RecrssUc~ (Fig. N, le - N20)
5.
8. ,^"
e.~
11,
12. ^'
13,"
14, ~
15.~._~
16,_'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~_
17.
Equestr~q Trm~s tFig. IV.19 - lV.24/
Riv. Co. 800 Sclle Equestrian Trail M~ps)
Utilities (Fig. N25 - N~6) ·" '.'~- :~' '~"
Llbrmrlas (Fig. N.17 - N. 18)
Hllllh Servk~t.'___ (Fig. N. 11 - IV.18)
Akpotll (Fig. 11.1 8~ - 11.18.4,
1.18~ - 11.18.10 1 N27 - N36)
DimmerPrepmredness
O~her
I Ill or pert of Ihe project is located in "Adopted Sped.it Pins", =FIEMAP" or '11wx:ho Villages Ccrnmunity Policy
1. 81ste the televent lend use dseignation(s):
e
Based on this inltll study, is Ihe proCx:eal consMte~t with the policies and clesignations of Ihe appropriate riocur
encl therefore consistent ~ Ihe Comprehensive General Ptln? ff not, explain:
0 t
. t.~D USE DETERMINKr~ON (continued)
D. If all or pad of the project site is in "Ames not Designated as Open Space", Ind is not in · Community Plan, complete
Questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete guestions 4, 5, 6 and 7 If it is in · Community Ran.
1. Land use category(m) necessary Io ~/~,, _,lhe, Ixo;osed ~ Also Indicate land use type
L/- --- /..
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) :'~. ~' c-/. ,,c/---, / ;---
indicate tlid use type
./L ' :;C;- :-::, ,"
3. If D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be resolved at the ¢3,~alop,.,znt Itage? Explain:
. 4. Community Plan designation(s): '~'
Is the proposed project consistent with the policies lid designations of the Community Plan~
ff not, explain: _,
Is the proposal compatible with existing lid proposed surrounding land uses?
~ not, explain: "/~ ~
7. Baled o~ this initial study, M the proposal consistlit wtth the Comprehensive Gef~eral Plan?
ff noL reference by Section lid Issue Number fix:s· issues identify~g inconlistex:ies:
E. If Ill or part of the project site is in In Open Space Ind Conservation de·ignition, complete the following:
1. State the de~·):
2. M the preptill consistent with the desigtmion(·)? ff not, explain:
3. Based on this inltiaJ Itudy, is the priXxxal ~,,-~lisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, mferertce by Section Ind issue Number lhoee liltill k;lentlfytng inconsistencies:
i'
·
V. )]F"JRMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION DETERM!~TION
I~SUE NO. REQUIRED RECkJESTED RECEIVED {YE$/NO~)ATE~
~A z_'.,~.'L~;.-~.[,_E; .~'.T~".~.I~'~"' r~, ,.~_:~'>-
-_ Z_~,~(, ~Cc "' ~;'~'=~ ,'c ,,
Z: ~, ~' . ~-~-..,~_~-r-.~~ ,~' ~,~,.~x~, "'~"
r- D ~/-~r ,.~ ;, ~/. ~, :-~.".~ ~/_~/-/~~"":~. '
,_ _. . . ~;, . , ',..-.c
For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sectms III.B end N.B, identify the Section end isue number and do the
following, in the format as shown below:
1. Ust 811 additional relevant data sources, including agencies consulted.
2. State all findings of fact regarding environmental concerns.
3. State specific mitigation measures, if iclentifi~ble wfthout requiring In environmental laDact report (E.I.R.)
4. If 8ddifional information is required before the environmental Ismessment can be completed, refer to
Subsection A.
5. ff additional sheets are needed to complete this eaction, check the box at the end of the section and attach
the necessary abets.
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
-- :,
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
"' '-- ,~-;.: ~'/,..~ . ,. "'-: <":.~,_ -;. 7~.:.,,.~. - ...,..
-j-, ,::..: ~--~,-,' ,;L~_/ ~"'",,.~," ~'
IV.
INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT ,eND MITIGATION MEASURES (Gontlnued)
SECTION/
I~SUE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
I .-
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
The IxoJect wi~ not hlve · dgnlficlnt effect on the efwironnant and · Negative Declaration may be
papered.
(or)
The project could hive · lignlficlnt effect on the environment; however, there will not be · significant
~ in Iht= ~ because ~e rnltigNtcm n~lmurls ~ in Section V hive been rapplied to the
project m'td · Negative Declarmtion my be I:xeplrld.
The project my have · ~ignlft,,lnt effect on ~e environment and mn Environmental Iml~ct Report
I= re~lutrtd.
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
DATE:
September 10, 1991
SUBJECT:
Final Parcel Map No. 26036
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council approve Final Parcel Map 26036 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Parcel Map 26036 was originally submitted to the Planning Department on
April 6, 1990. An initial study on April 16, 1990 concluded that the map would not
cause significant impact upon the environment, given that full buildout of the site has
already occurred. The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 26036
on August 20, 1990.
The project involves the re-establishment of two (2) parcels which were merged under
Certificate of Parcel Merger No. 585, under Riverside County Jurisdiction. Prior to the
merger, the parcels were identified as Lots 10 & 11 of Tract 16178. The lots were
merged when Plot Plans 9474 and 10923 were developed.
Parcel Map 26036 proposes to subdivide a 1.79 acre industrial parcel into two (2)
parcels of .89 and .90 acres. It is located on the west side of Enterprise Circle West,
at Rider Way. The applicants are Won and Insook Yoo.
All development fees were paid with the recordation of the underlying Tract Map No.
1 6178 and with the issuance of building permits. Additional development fees were
not conditioned as part of Final Map Approval for this project. Since buildings exist
SANDEFKM\STAFFRPT\26036.PM 1
on the site at this time, construction is not authorized under this proposal· All off-site
improvements have been completed and therefore, bonds and securities are not
required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not Determined.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No.26036 subject
to the Conditions of Approval.
BY:tbb
Attachments:
Vicinity Map
Location Map
Planning Commission Minutes
dated August 20, 1990
Conditions of Approval
Fees and Securities Report
SANDEFKM\STAFFRPT\26036.PM 2
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 26036
DATE July 9, 1991
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
$ -0- $ -0-
k
i'
~AY
V:c.,~,Ty M~p- RH..,j.. ~P..c.~:,_ ,'vt~ Nc,.~,os~,
No"T To ~c.AL~
PLANNING COMMISSION NINUTES AUGUST 20, 1~90 -
improvements for Lot 31 be completed pr'
of any lots.
to occupancy
Sam Reed stated that staff could am~ Condition No. 16 -
B to state "street improvements and ndscape improvements
on Via La Vida will be completed ior to occupancy".
Convnissioner Hoagland moved to ~rove staff's
reconnnendation and adopt the ative Declaration for
Tentative Tract No. 23990, a approve Tentative Tract
No. 23990, subject to the .owing modifications to
Conditions of &pproval: C tion No. 13 - (1), change
to read "prior to the of building permits"
as long as appropriate ds have been issued:
Condition No. 13 - ( delete the wall requirement
on the east side of ~ property: Condition No. 15 - H,
to remain as ~ded by staff; Condition No. 16 - E,
street and lands, ~ improvements on Via La Vida
completed pri occupancy permit; Condition No. 43,
amended to re~ 'Lots shall not be allowed to drain
on adjacent cts without a grading and/or drainage
permit"; C~ tion No. 59, added as requested by the
Traffic rtment and Condition No. 60, added for the
payment Quimby Act Fees. Conlnissioner Blair seconded
the mo ~, which carried the following roll call vote:
: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1
COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
Tentative Parcel Map. No...26036
3.1 Sam Reed presented the staff's report on the subdivision
of a 1.79 acre parcel with existing buildings.
Dave James, Ranpac Engineering, 27447 Enterprise Circle
West, Temecula, gave a brief summary of the request and
addressed the Commission's comments.
Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing,
seconded by Commissioner Hoagland.
]1IN.8/20/90 -4- 8/23/90
PLANNING COMMI SSION..NINUTES
AUGUST 20, 1990
CommisSioner Blair moved to adopt the Negative Declaration
for Parcel Map No. 26036 and approve Parcel Map No. 26036,
based on the Conditions of Approval set forth by the
Planning Department. Commission_er Fahey seconded the
motion which carried the following vote.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
4.._& 5. Plot Plan No. 5 and. No. 6
Sam Reed presented the staff report
No. 5, the construction of a 11,050
manufacturing facility on .57
No. 6, the construction of a 12,
manufacturing facility on .63
Plot Plan
foot light
nd Plot Plan
square foot light
Joe Ventress, J.R. Miller & Ass ares, 2854 E. Imperial
Highway, Brea, gave a brief de ription of the project.
Mr. Venttess stated that the .al square footage did
not include mezzanines in bo' buildings; however, the
parking study incorporated s extra square footage.
Mr. Ventress indicated an or in the staff report
on page 4, under Health De rtment, and advised the
Commission that the Heal Department requirements for
both plot plans had eviewed.
Commissioner_ Chiniaeff ~ked if the applicant would be
opposed to reconfigur the location of the trash
enclosure and the tr' loading doors so that they do
not face the street. Conwnissioner Chiniaeff also
expressed concern sufficient landscape and proper
screening of roof ~ipment.
Mr. Venttess sta' the project has satisfied the
landscape re~ui ~ents and provided for sufficien~
screening of roof equipment, but that they could
accomodate th :on~nission's requests. He also stated
that there wol be no problem turning the door of the
trash encl . away from the street; however, in
relocatinq truck loading doors, the needs of the
tenant would have to be considered.
NZN. 8/20/90 -5- 8/2:S/90
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 20, 1990
Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 26036
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Won Sang Yoo and Insook Yoo
Ranpac Engineering
Subdivide a 1.79 acre industrial parcel into 2 lots of
· 89 and . 90 acres.
On the west side of Enterprise Circle West, newar
the terminus of Rider Way.
MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial
North: MSC
South: MSC
East: MSC
West: MSC
North:
South:
East:
West:
Man ufactu ring / Office
Man ufactu ring / Office
Manufacturing/Commercial
Vacant
Total Acreage:
No. of Proposed Parcels:
1.79 acres
2
STAFFRPT\TPM26036
ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCR IPT ION:
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
This project was submitted to the City of Temecula
on April 6, 1990. It was reviewed at the Preliminary
Development Review Committee meeting on May 17,
1990. Background information was requested by
the Engineering Department at that time and all
pertinent information was received. An Initial
Study was completed on April 16, 1990 which
concluded that no significant impacts would affect
the environment as a result of project
implementation, given that full buildout of the site
has already occurred.
This project involves the re-establishment of two
{2) parcels which were merged under Certificate of
Parcel Merger No. 585, under Riverside County
jurisdiction. Prior to the merger, the parcels were
identified as parcels 10 and 11 of Tract 16178. When
Plot Plans 9~7~ and 10923 were constructed, the
parcels were merged. At this time a covered glass
breezeway connects two separate buildings, each on
one of the two proposed parcels. {See attached
Parcel Merger Exhibit and Tentative Parcel Map No.
26036. )
Staff perceives no technical problems in subdividing
the existing 1.79 acre parcels as long as appropriate
restrictions and reciprocal access agreements are in
place at the time of map recordation.
Improvements and I nfrast ructu re
No construction is authorized under this approval;
buildings exist on the site at this time. No site
improvements of off-site installations are required
to approve the project.
The land use currently in place on-site is consistent
with zoning regulations and the SWAP designation.
Staff finds it highly probable that this project will
be consistent with the new General Plan when it is
adopted.
In compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act IC.E.Q.A.), an Initial Study was
performed for this project. Staff found no
possibility of a significant impact on the
environment. That Initial Study is attached for
review. A Negative Declaration has been
FINDINGS:
recommended for adoption·
There is a reasonable probability that Parcel
Map No. 26036 will be consistent with the
City's future General Plan, which will be
completed in a reasonable time and in
accordance with State law.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed subdivision in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for this project.
10.
The design of the project, the type of
improvements, and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project.
11.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
J
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for
Parcel Map No. 26036.
2. APPROVE Parcel Map No. 26036.
based on the analysis and findings contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions
of Approval.
SR:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Initial Environmental Study
3. Letter from Fire Dept.
4. Cert. of Parcel Map Merger
5. Exhibits
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
Ranpac Engineering Corporation
~ddress and Phone
Number of Proponent:
27447 Enterprise 0 W
Temecula, California 92390
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
5-16-90
4. Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
e
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
T.P.M. 26036
6. Location of Proposal:
On W~t ~idp nf Fnt~rprise Circle
~n~th nf Rider Way
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
X
X
X
X
BLANKIES/FORMS -1-
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslid·s,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
he
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Ce
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life· Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
{birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Ce
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
p!/~ ldVll:C
Yes
Maybe
No
X
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset· Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticicles,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
~:':' B! ,~NKIE-~II=O~M¢ -b-
be
ee
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
de
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
16.
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
BLANKIES/FORMS
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
-5-
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
ae
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard {excluding
mental health ) ?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics· Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
ae
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
BLANKIES/FORMS
-6-
Yes
X
X
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehlstory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? I A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? {A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
BLANKIES/FORMS
-7-
Yes
~ N_9o
Project Description
The applicant seeks to subdivide property, previously merged, into 2 lots, .9 and
.89 acres in size. Two buildings have been constructed on the site. (PP 10923 and
9~7~ processed through Riverside County files not transmitted to Temecula as of this
date)
Photos of the site indicate that the buildings are joined by a glass breezeway or
atrium. Landscaping is marginal and the construction on the site appears relatively
recent.
A review of the M-SC Zoning Section of Ordinance No. 3L~8 indicates that the proposal
lots exceed minimum lot size 110,000 sq.ft. ). M-SC zoning is on all four sides.
Ordinance 348, Section 11 .~4.b. 12) states no minimum building setback, except that
| 3 ) says 25 feet from street right-d-ways.
The existing building on proposed Parcel No. 1 is 10 fee back from the right-d-way,
in conflict with the code provision cited above. Applicant will be requested to
provide information relative to this seeming inconsistency. I A P.I.D. application
may not have the same provision. )
III Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
Earth
1.8.
No. This application will not physically alter the site in any way. Earth
conditions, soil, topography, and erosion potentials were presumably
assessed and impacts mitigated under Plot Plan Application Numbers
10923 and 9~7~.
1.g.
The project is in an area recognized with extreme liquefaction potential
during episodes of ground shaking. It is not likely that any additional
people would use the site as a result of the proposed parcel split. It is
presumed that the grading and building design incorporates features
to minimuze damage related to ground shaking.
Air
No. This application will not alter air emissions, increase odors or alter
the local climate in any fashion.
Water
3.a-i..
No. No change in water movement, absorption, flow of floodwaters,
water quality, groundwater supplies in a qualitative or quantitative
sense, water supplies or exposure of people to floodwaters will occur as
a result of project implementation. No new construction is proposed.
These impacts were presumably addressed in previous County-
processed proposals.
Plant Life
~.a-d.
No. The site has
previous approvals.
split.
been graded and buildings constructed under
No additional impact can result from a 2 lot parcel
Animal Life
No. The site has been graded and buildings constructed under
previous approvals. No additional impact can result from a 2 lot parcel
split.
Noise
6.a,b.
No. Noise levels will not increase as a result of project implementation.
No new noise generating features are proposed.
Liqht and Glare
No. Previously addressed under earlier plot plan approvals. No new
lighting is proposed.