HomeMy WebLinkAbout092491 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA TEMPORARY COMMUNITY CENTER - 27475 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE
SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 - 7:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 91-37
Resolution: No. 91-97
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Pastor Steven Struikmans, Rancho Community Church
Flag Salute
Councilmember Moore
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Appreciation - Sam and Gloria Hasson
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak' form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
beforq the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
21egend~O92481 I 09/18/91
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 27, 1991 as mailed.
2.2 Approve the minutes of September 10, 1991 as mailed.
3
Resolution AoorovinQ List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
Amendment to Flexible Benefit Plan Document
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN DOCUMENT
21egendNO92491 2 Oil1 Bill
Resolution Reauest County Flood Control to Clear Vegetation from Murrieta Creek
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS AND
ACTIONS TO CLEAR DEBRIS AND GRADE THE MURRIETA CREEK CHANNEL
THROUGH THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Award of Street Maintenance Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Award contracts for annual street maintenance to Ramtek Contractors,
Inc. of Temecula and Russell Tourville Construction of Rancho
Cucamonga, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Final Parcel MaD No. 23335
(Property located north of the Junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 23335 subject to the conditions of
approval.
8
Final Parcel Mao No. 24762
(Property located immediately north of Rider Way and east of Enterprise Circle West)
8.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 24762 subject to the conditions of
approval.
9
Award of Bid - Traffic Signal Target Center
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Award bid to lowest responsible bidder.
21agenclNOe24e 1 3 Oe/18/91
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
lo
Chanc~e of Zone Aoolication No, 14
RECOMMENDATION:
10,1
Read by title only and adopt an .ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 14, CHANGING
THE ZONE FROM R-A 2 1/2 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, 2 112 ACRE LOT
SIZE MINIMUM) TO R-A (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ ROAD AND SANTIAGO
ROAD
11
Chancje of Zone AOOliCatiOn NO, 15
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-36
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION NO. 15 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-Ao2 1/2 TO R-1-1
ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WALCOTT LANE
AND CALLE CHAPOS, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'$ PARCEL NO. 914-300-049
COUNCIL BUSINESS
12
Fundinq for Temecula Annual Rodeo
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Birdsall)
RECOMMENDATION:
12, 1 Consider request and provide desired staff direction.
2/e~encleK)92491 4 09118/I 1
13
Solid Waste - Grandfather Hauler Reaulations
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS GOVERNING SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL BY
GRANDFATHERED WASTE HAULERS WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
14
Ordinance AdootincJ Park and Recreational Facilitv Ooerational Policies and Regulations
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Read by title only and introduce and Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES
AND REGULATIONS
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 5, 1991, 7:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community
Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California
218gef~d,i/O82481 6 08118/81
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00)
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 91-02
Resolution: No. 91-12
CALL TO ORDER:
President J. Sal Mur~oz
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mur~oz
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 27, 1991 as mailed.
1.2
Approve the minutes of the meeting of September 10, 1991 as mailed.
2
Architectural and Landscaoe Architectural Services for CIP Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Appoint Robert E. Brotherton Architect/The Alhambra Group to provide
conceptual architectural services for the Community Recreation Center
and conceptual landscape architectural services for undeveloped city
park sites.
PUBLIC HEARING
3
Adoorion of Parks and Recreation Use Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Conduct public hearing regarding Park and Recreational
Operational Policies and Regulations and Fee Schedule.
Facility
21eOertd&/092491 e 09/18/91
3.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF EXISTING
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITY RESERVATION FEES
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4
Park Prooertv on La Serena Way
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Defer any decisions concerning the intended use of the property on La
Serena Way until the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting October 8, 1991, 8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula
Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula,
California
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 91-11
Chairperson Peg Moore presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans,
Muftoz, Parks
Moore,
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
21agendNO92491 7 09/18/91
AGENCY BUSINESS
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 27, 1991 as mailed.
1.2 Approve the minutes of September 10, 1991 as mailed.
2
Regulations and Selection - Old Town Temecula Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Continue to the meeting of October 8, 1991.
EXECUTIVE, DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting October 8, 1991,8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula
Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula,
California.
21egenda/O82481 8 0~118/~1
Certificate of Appreciation
The City Council of the City of Temecula
on behalf of the citizens of the City of Temecula,
commends the outstanding contribution
of
Sam' and Gloria Hasson
For providing a home for the Temecula Museum at 28670 Front Street during the period of time
from 1989 to 1991. Your generous donation has allowed the Museum Foundation to enrich the
lives of residents and visitors alike by sharing knowledge of Temecula and its rich and colorful
history.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this
19th day of September, 1991
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AUGUST 27, 1991
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PM in the Main
Conference Room of Temecula City Hall, Temecula, California. Mayor Ronald J. Parks
presiding.
PRESENT 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz,
Parks
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, Assistant City
Manager Mark Ochenduszko, City Engineer Tim Serlet and City Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Parks declared a re.cess to an executive session at 5:41 PM, pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956(b) and 54956(c) to discuss potential litigation.
The meeting was reconvened by Mayor Parks in Regular Session at 7:12 PM, in the
Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, CA.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Father Edward Renner of St. Thomas Episcopal Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, addressed the Council regarding damage caused
to Long Ridge Drive as the result of a water line break. He requested that the City require the
Rancho California Water District to make proper repairs. He also spoke regarding the need for
strong enforcement of speed limits on Winchester Road.
Linda Cloughen, 41304 Bravos Court, asked if door-to-door solicitation has been addressed
in the proposed Business Registration Ordinance.
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer, stated that provisions were included which regulate door-
to-door solicitation and also that the Ordinance requires photo identification for these types
of sales.
Minutes\8/27/91 - 1 - 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Au~iust 27. 1991
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Parks removed item number 10 from the Consent Calendar due to the number of
speakers wishing to be heard on this matter.
Councilmember Lindemans recorded a "no" vote on Consent Calendar item number 13.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar items number one through nine and eleven through fourteen as follows:
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of August 5, 1991.
Approve the minutes of August 6, 1991.
Approve the minutes of August 13, 1991.
Resolution ADDroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1991
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and File the City Treasurer's Report
Minutes\8/27/91 -2- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes August 27. 1991
AGreement Establishinq RedeveloDment Aqency Administrative Trust and Revolvincj
FUnd
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Approve an agreement between the City of Temecula and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula to establish an Agency
Administrative Fund and a Revolving Fund.
Acceptance of Public Improvements - Tract No. 20703-1
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract 20703-1 and authorize the
reduction of Faithful Performance Street, Sewer and Water bonds.
Accept the Faithful Performance Maintenance bonds.
Approve the Subdivision Agreement Rider.
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
AccePtance of Public Improvements - Tract No. 22786
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract 22786 and authorize the
reduction of Faithful Performance Street, Sewer and Water bonds.
Accept the Faithful Performance Maintenance bonds.
Approve the Subdivision Agreement Rider.
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Final Parcel MaD No. 26625
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 26625.
Minutes\8/27/91 -3- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes August 27, 1991
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
9. Ordinance ADDroving Zone Change No. 9 - Providing for Duplex and Four-olex Units in
Planning Area NO. 37
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 348.2922 OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF
ZONE NO. 9, TO INCLUDE LANGUAGE PROVIDING FOR DUPLEX AND FOUR-
PLEX UNITS IN PLANNING AREA NO. 37 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199
11.
Business License Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-33
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS REGISTRATION PROGRAM.
12.
Ordinance ADDroving Zone Change No. 5755
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-30
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 5755 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-
SC (MANUFACTURING SERVICE COMMERCIAL) TO CI/CP (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) ON 6.2 NET ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ
AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROADS, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-020-058 AND 059.
Minutes\8/27/91 -4- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Auoust 27, 1991
14.
Ordinance to Grant a Franchise to Southern California Gas Company
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-32
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING TO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS THE RIGHT, PRIVILEGE AND FRANCHISE TO LAY AND USE PIPES AND
APPURTENANCES FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING GAS FOR ANY AND ALL
PURPOSES UNDER, ALONG, ACROSS OR UPON THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS
ALLEYS AND PLACES, AS THE SAME NOW OR MAY HEREAFTER EXIST WITHIN
SAID MUNICIPALITY
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
13.
Ordinance Amending Zoning MaD in Change of Zone No. 16
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-31
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION
NO. 16 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-P-S (SCENIC
HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL} LOCATED AT 27628 JEFFERSON AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-130-026.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
Minutes\8/27/91 -5- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Auoust 27, 1991
10.
Ordinance Regulating Outdoor Advertising Displays
Edwin E. Wheeler, 40300 Via Francisco, Murrieta, questioned if a fee is associated
with the adoption of the proposed ordinance.
City Attorney Scott Field outlined the provisions of the ordinance explaining that it
propose a modification of the billboard moratorium ordinance and does not address the
small A-frame signs or banners.
City Manager Dixon advised that the matter of small identification signs, banners, A-
frame signs, etc., needs to have a policy decision from the Council. He advised that
the staff has been directed to take a very conservative approach to enforcement of
violations of the existing ordinance.
Joyce White, 27623 Jefferson Road, spoke in favor of the City approving A-frame and
banner signs for use by the small businesses.
Bill Fowler, 28410 Front Street, Suite 112-b, spoke in favor of giving special
consideration to small business using these signs during the economic slump currently
being experienced.
Lee Richardson, 41850 Moreno Road, spoke in favor of the Council approving the use
of banners for the business community.
Don Forth, 41680 Enterprise Circle South, spoke in favor of the City Council allowing
the use of banners for advertising. He requested consideration of a one year period
to exempt businesses from enforcement of the existing ordinance provisions.
Troy Johns, 28410 Front Street, No. 103, spoke in favor of granting a one-year period
of time in which the sign ordinance would not be enforced regarding use of banners.
Greg Treadwell 27300 "B" Jefferson, spoke in favor of the City sending a clear
message to the business community that they wish to help in these economic times.
Simon Afif, spoke in opposition to any additional shopping centers being allowed
because there is so much space currently available in existing centers.
Joan C. Tussing, Front Street, spoke in opposition to restrictive sign regulations.
Ronnie Larrivee, 28532 Front Street, spoke in favor of the City allowing A-frame signs
and banners to be used by the merchants.
Roni K. Graves, 31040 Via Norte, spoke in favor of realtors being allowed to use small
parkway signs and A-frame signs to advertise.
Minutes\8/27/91 -6- O9/17/91
City Council Minutes August 27, 1991
Mike Dumalski, 28860 Front Street, requested Council consideration of granting a one-
year period of time in which the provisions of the sign ordinance would not be
enforced regarding use of banners and A-frame signs.
Phillip Columbo, 29000 Front Street, spoke in favor of a six-month moratorium on
enforcement of the sign ordinance.
Rob Keating, 28410 Front Street, addressed the economic climate that requires special
consideration. He suggested the Council establish a committee to look at the needs
of the community relative to sign use.
Linda Bojorquez, 28540 Front Street, spoke in favor of allowing the use of A-frame
signs.
Dorothy Kuski, spoke in favor of the realtors being allowed to use their small signs on
the weekends an during the week on "preview days".
City Attorney Scott Field advised that "moratoriums" are used to prohibit actions or
matters. He also advised that the matter of the sign ordinance can be addressed by
the City Council under the agenda title listed.
Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall questioned the status of the citations currently issued for sign
violations.
City Manager Dixon advised that staff can be directed to hold enforcement in abeyance
at the Council's discretion.
Councilmember Mufioz stated he would like to see a committee, representing the
business community, the Chamber of Commerce, Realtors and members of the general
public, established to review the sign ordinance.
Councilmember Lindemans suggested that a report from this proposed committee be
brought back to the Council directly.
It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
establish a sign ordinance review committee to prepare and present recommendations
to the City Council within 90 days, and further to direct staff to hold enforcement in
abeyance until after this matter has come back for reconsideration.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Moore
Minutes\8/27/91 -7- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes August 27, 1991 -
Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall stated that the business owners should be aware that as a
result of the Council's action, they are now "in control" of the aesthetics of the
community and this responsibility should not be taken lightly.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-29
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 91-17
PERTAINING TO REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
DISPLAYS
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Moore
RECESS
Mayor Parks declared a recess at 8:24 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:58 PM
immediately after the adjournment of the Temecula Community Services and Temecula
Redevelopment Agency meetings.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15.
ADOeal NO. 15 - WinSton Tire/Local Neon Company
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tim Serlet introduced newly hired Senior
Planners John Meyer and Debbie Ubnoske to the City Council and public. Ms Ubnoske
then presented the staff report.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 9:02 PM.
Ron Wolter, representing the applicants stated that the proposal is for a sign to be
mounted on the side of the building they occupy which will extend above the roof
parapet.
Dan Perlmutter, representing DMP Properties, owners of the Winchester Shopping
Center, stated that Winston Tire is an anchor tenant of this center and they badly need
the sign exposure on Jefferson Avgnue.
Minutes\8/27/91 -8- O9/17/91
City Council Minutes August 27, 1991
Councilmember Mu~oz questioned the reason a monument sign does not meet the
requirements for visibility on Jefferson Avenue. Mr. Perlmutter stated that a
monument sign of adequate size would do the job but the Planning Commission has
not approved the two proposed monument signs for the center at a size sufficient to
allow for the needs of the center's tenants.
Mayor Parks declared the hearing closed at 9:16 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, to
uphold the appeal and reverse the Planning Commission recommendation for denial.
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Moore absent.
16
Tentative Parcel MaD No. 25418
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske presented the staff report. She advised the Council
that the 2.64 acre parcel (known as lot 25) at the corner of Margarita Road and
DePortola Road is not included in this application.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 9:24 PM.
Robert Kimble, of RBF Engineering, representing the applicant, stated that the applicant
concurs with the staff recommendations.
Brian Sweeney, representing the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association stated that
the homeowners association wished to withdraw their request to speak forms in
opposition to this development based on the clarification from staff that Lot 25 is not
a part of this plan.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
16.1
Adopt a Negative Declaration for Vesting Parcel Map No. 25418, and;
16.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 254189 TO SUBDIVIDE
A 36.4 ACRE PARCEL INTO FIVE COMMERCIAL PARCELS AND NINE OPEN
SPACE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA
ROAD AND HIGHWAY 79 AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 926-
013-012.
Tho motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Moore absent.
Mi nutes\8/27/91 -9- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Auoust 27, 1991 -
17
Temporary Closure of Avenida De La Reina
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tim Serlet presented the staff report. He
advised that the responses to the post card mailing, notifying the residents of this
proposal, totaled 89 responses in favor of the street closure and 27 responses in
opposition.
Mayor Parks declared the public hearing open at 9:34 PM.
The following speakers spoke in favor of the street closure:
D. J. Loyst, 41682 Avenida De La Reina
Lisa Vitucci, 31130 Corte Arroyo Vista
Todd LiPetri, 41663 Avenida De La Reina
Mary Giordano, 41639 Avenida De La Riena
Joe Sequin, 41640 Avenida De La Riena
Kathy Hamilton, 41681 Avenida De La Reina
Carolyn Smith, no address given.
The following speakers spoke in opposition to the street closure:
Rita V. Hernandez, 31149 Corte Alhambra
Anthony Bergeron, 31300 Corte Alhambra
Councilmember Lindemans read a letter from Mr. Deliberti into the record in favor of
the proposal.
Gloria Brom, Corte De los Santos questioned if the Fire Department has been notified
of this action. City Manager David Dixon stated that they have been notified and that
representatives of the Department are present at the meeting.
Mayor Parks declared the hearing closed at 9:50 PM.
In response to a question from Councilmember Lindemans, City Engineer Serlet advised
that if the closure of this street were to become permanent, staff would be looking into
adding the abandoned portion to an existing small neighborhood park.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
approve the temporary closure of Avenida De La Reina between Calle Aragon and
Corte Arroyo Vista for six (6) months to determine the feasibility of implementation of
a permanent closure. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Moore
absent.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall to
continue the meeting to the hour of 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried
with Councilmember Moore absent.
Minutes\8/27/91 - 1 O- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Auoust 27, 1991
RECESS
A recess was declared by Mayor Parks at 9:55 PM. The meeting was reconvened at
10:06 PM.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18.
Adoorion of Urqencv Ordinance Amendincj Chapter 2.20 of the Temecula Municipal
Code and Aooroval of an Interim Multi-Hazard Functional Plan
Assistant City Manager Mark Ochenduszko introduced the staff report and
recommended that staff also be directed to work with the Public Safety Commission
in developing annexes to make the plan more specific to the City of Temecula.
Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall stated that she would like to have a portable cellular telephone
placed and maintained at the local radio station to assure communications in the event
of a disaster. She also suggested that the plan specifically address the matter of
housing for relief organizations.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
18.1
Approve and adopt the Interim Multi-hazard Functional Plan for the City
of Temecula.
18.2
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-34
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 2.20 "DISASTER RELIEF" OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A DISASTER COUNCIL,
ESTABLISHING THE POWERS AND DUTIES THEREOF, AND AMENDING
DEFINITIONS AND PENALTIES
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
Staff was further directed to involve the Public Safety Commission in greater detail and
to institute interaction with the Temecula Unified School District.
Minutes\8/27/91 -11- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Auoust 27.1991
19.
20.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated for clarification that the Disaster Council is composed
of City staff and members of various emergency service agencies. He questioned the
role of the City Council and asked when that will be addressed. City Manager Dixon
advised that this will be defined as the annexes to the plan are developed.
Consideration of City of Temecula Economic DeveloPment Brochure
City Manager David Dixon presented a staff report and requested that two member of
the Council be specified to work with the City Manager in developing the program.
Councilmember Mufioz suggested that local advertising should be considered such as
in the Orange and San Diego areas.
It was moved by Mayor Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to nominate
Councilmembers Lindemans and Birdsall to serve on this project committee with the
City Manager. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Moore
absent.
Mayor Parks suggested that some additional citizen input be solicited by the
committee. He also requested that a budget be developed and presented to the City
Council for this program.
Appointments to Old Town Historic Review Committee
After brief discussion it was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Lindemans to continue this matter to the meeting of September 10,
1991 to allow Council to provide staff with any additional recommendations for
appointments.
Councilmember Mu~oz requested that the name of Christina Grina be added to the list
for consideration.
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Moore absent.
21.
Undergrounding of Utility Lines and Interim Road Widening Within Community Facilities
District CFD-88-12.
City Engineer Tim Serlet presented the staff report and advised that a request of staff
has been made to look into installing a temporary widening of Ynez Road from Solana
Way south to Rancho Town Center and the Tower Plaza, with a completion date prior
to the Christmas holidays. He stated he feels this timetable is not possible.
Councilmember Mu~oz suggested that staff bring back a report addressing whether the
ultimate widening is still necessary, in light of the fact this was originally planned to
service a regional shopping center proposed for Ynez Road.
Minutes\8/27/91 - 12- 09/1719 1
City Council Minutes August 27, 1991
22.
23.
Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall stated that she would like the report to include an assessment
of the costs involved to change the specs and re-engineer the road. She questioned
the time estimate for completion if the six-lane roadway goes forward. Mr. Serlet
advised that completion is anticipated at the end of 1992.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue this matter for two weeks. The motion was unanimously carried with
Councilmember Moore absent.
Amendment to CFD 88-112 Engineering Services Contract with J. F. Davidson
Associates, Inc.
The staff report was presented by City Engineer Tim Serlet.
Mayor Parks suggested that the amount of the contract be reduced by $30,000
because that amount is predicated on the design costs necessary if Edison facilities are
undergrounded.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
approve a contract amendment with J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. to provide
additional design services in the amount of 656,100 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract amendment. The motion was unanimously carried with
Councilmember Moore absent.
Authorization to Purchase Former School Bus Facility Located in Old Town
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
23.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE
$500,000 FOR PURCHASE OF PARCEL NO. 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 24038
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Moore
Minutes\8/27/91 - 13- 09/17/91
City Council Minutes Auoust 27.1991
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manger Dixon reported he has been asked to participate in several sessions at the
annual League of California Cities meeting in October.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
None given
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
adjourn at 11:13 PM to a meeting to be held at 7:00 PM on September 10, 1991 in
the Temecula Temporary Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive,
Temecula, California
ATTEST:
RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR
JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK
Minutes\8/27/91 - 14- 09/17/91
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1991
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:07 PM in the Main
Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Mayor Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT 3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Parks
Lindemans, Mu~oz
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Mark Ochenduszko,
City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Parks declared a recess to an executive session pursuant to Government Code Section
54957 to discuss Personnel Matter and Government Code Section 54956.9(c) regarding
potential litigation.
Councilmember Lindemans joined the Executive Session at 6:15 PM. Councilmember Mu~oz
joined the Executive Session at 6:22 PM.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:11 PM in regular session by Mayor Parks, with all members
present.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Reverend Joan Rich Egan, Church of Religious Science.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Councilmember Lindemans presented an aerial photograph and poster of Voorburg, Holland
to the City Council.
Councilmember Mu~oz introduced John McCusker, a senior at Temecula Valley High School,
who spoke regarding the DECA (Distributive Education Clubs of America) program and advised
the City Council he will be running for the office of National President.
Mark Ochenduszko, Assistant City Manager, introduced two new employees, Luci Romero and
Grant Yates who will be working in the office of the City Manager and Finance Department
as Senior Management Analysts.
Ninutes\09\10\91 -1- 09/18/91
City Council Minutes September 10, 1991
Mayor Parks presented the Mayor's trophy to the City Council which he won at the Tractor
Race Media Day. He also thanked the City Council, staff and citizens for their support in the
loss of his father.
PUBLIC FORUM
Sam Levine, 42367 Cosmic Drive, representing the Seniors' Golden Years of Temecula Valley,
presented the City Clerk with a petition containing 1,364 signatures, supporting the
establishment of a senior center.
Linda Peterson, 29995 Los Nagales, addressed the City Council regarding the rules and
regulations imposed by Temecula Environmental regarding trash pick-up. She further informed
the City Council of the method used by Inland Disposal for yard waste collection.
Joe Seguin, 41640 Avenida De La Reina, thanked the City Council, staff and various
committees for their help with traffic problems in the City.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Parks stated that it has been requested that Item No. 7 be continued to September 24,
199.1.
Councilmember Lindemans requested that Item No. 4 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-3, 5, 6 and 8-11.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1
2. Minutes
2.1
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
None
None
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Approve the minutes of August 20, 1991 as mailed.
Ninutes\09\10\91 -2- 09/18/91
City Council Minutes
3. Resolution ADDrOving List of Demands
3.1
Seotember 10. 1991
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Agreement
5.1 Approve the amended agreements for the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency.
Reduce Faithful Performance Security for Parcel MaD No. 22610
6.1
Accept completion of street improvements and authorize the reduction
in street Faithful Performance Security amount.
6.2
Approve the subdivision agreement rider.
6.3
Accept the Faithful Performance Trust Deposit in the reduced amount
and direct the City Clerk to so notify the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
Final Tract MaD No. 24232
8.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24232, subject to the conditions of
approval.
Final Parcel MaD No. 26036
9.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 26036 subject to the conditions of
approval.
10.
Contract Services - Planning DePartment
10.1 Authorize a professional service contract with
consultant, pursuant to the attached documents.
Forma, a planning
Ninutes\O~\lO\~l -3- 0~/18/~1
Ciw Council Minutes
11.
Appropriation From Redevelooment Agency Revolving Fund
11.1
Seotember 10, 1991
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE
FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND FOR THE ACQUISITION BY
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY GENERALLY KNOWN AS MARGARITA CANYON
Statement of Revenues, Exoenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year
ended June 30, 1991.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he removed this item from the Consent Calendar
because he wanted to read the balances for the public.
It was moved
approve staff
4.1
4.2
by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
recommendations as follows:
Receive and File the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991 and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
for the Twelve Months ended June 30, 1991.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 BUDGET AS DETAILED IN
ATTACHMENT "A"
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Final Parcel Mao No. 23335
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
None
None
Robert Kimble, representing the applicant Bedford Properties, stated he concurred with
the recommended continuance.
Hinutes\09\10\91 -6- 09/18/91
Ciw Council Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
continue this item to the meeting of September 24, 1991.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
None
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. Change of Zone No. 14, Tentative Parcel Mao No. 26845
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning, introduced the staff report, and recommended that
Condition No. 66 be included in the Conditions of Approval.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:50 PM.
Sandy Finn, representing the applicant, concurred with staff recommendations.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
12.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 14 and Tentative
Parcel Map 26845.
12.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON 3.68
ACRES OF LAND FROM R-A 2 1/2 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 2 1/2 ACRE
LOT SIZE MINIMUM) TO RA (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL) AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ ROAD AND SANTIAGO ROAD AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-060-007
Hinutes\09\10\91 -5- 0~/18/91
City Council Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
12.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26845 TO SUBDIVIDE A 3.68
ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR PARCELS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF YNEZ ROAD AND SANTIAGO ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 945-060-007
12.4
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 14, CHANGING
THE ZONE FROM R-A 2 112 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, 2 1/2 ACRE LOT
SIZE MINIMUM) TO R-A (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ ROAD AND SANTIAGO
ROAD
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
13.
Chanae of Zone No. 15, Tentative Parcel MaD NO. 26488
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning, introduced the staff report.
Councilmember Mur~oz asked if it is appropriate to approve these change of zone
requests without a general plan in place. Mr. Thornhill responded this zone change is
being recommended by staff based upon the SWAP guideline.
Mayor Parks stated that there has been no opposition to this project by surrounding
property owners, and further explained this property is on the perimeter of the City
where this zone change should not present a problem.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:58 PM.
Hinutes\O~\10\91 -6- 09/18/91
City Council Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
Jay Vanderwall, the applicant, requested that the City Council approve staff
recommendation and also requested Condition No. 29, which requires paved road
access, be changed to decomposed granite paving, a much more affordable solution.
Mayor Parks stated he would not be in favor of changing Condition No. 29 and stated
an "all weather road" is necessary.
Nelson Bettencourt, 40835 Calle Medusa, spoke in favor of the change of zone,
stating it will relieve some of the traffic problems on Calle Medusa.
Mayor Parks called a brief recess at 8:07 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:08 PM.
Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 8:10 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
13.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 15 and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 26488.
13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 15, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A-2
1/2 TO R-1-1 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
WALCOTT LANE AND CALLE CHAPO$ AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 914-300-049
13.3 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-36
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION NO. 15 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A-2 1/2 TO R-1-1
ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WALCOTT LANE
AND CALLE CHAPOS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914-300-
049
Ninutes\09\10\91 -7- 0~/18/91
Citv Council Minutes September 10, 1991
13.4
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 26488 TO SUBDIVIDE A 4.5 + ACRE PARCEL
INTO FOUR ONE GROSS ACRE (MINIMUM) RESIDENTIAL PARCELS; GENERAL
LOCATION OF SAID MAP BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WALCOTT
LANE AND CALLE CHAPOS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECESS
Mayor Parks called a recess to accommodate the previously scheduled Community Services
Meeting at 8:15 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the CSD meeting at 9:00 PM.
14. Soecial Events Permit Resolution
Mark Ochenduszko, Assistant City Manager, introduced the staff report.
Councilmember Moore suggested that the word "walk" be added to Section 1.
Councilmember Mu~oz suggested that guidelines for waiving fees be considered at a
later date to insure consistency and fairness.
Mayor Parks voiced a concern that this may be too cumbersome and difficult for
citizens to hold events. Assistant City Manager Ochenduszko stated the intent of the
ordinance is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens in the community
and not to over-regulate. He stated every effort will be made if there are problems to
be helpful and flexible.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 9:12 PM.
Leigh Engdahl, 41859 Corte Selva, asked if this would apply to Chamber Mixers. Mr.
Ochenduszko answered this would only apply to events held in the public right-of-way
and would not include events on private property.
N i nutes\09\l 0\91 - 8- 09/18/91
Ciw Council Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 9:14 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendation with the amendment in Section 1, adding the word
"walk" as follows:
14.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS ON
PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, SIDEWALKS, OR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz,
Parks
None
None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15. Undergrounding of Utility Lines and Interim Widening of Ynez Road
Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works, introduced the staff report.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if the Overland Overpass is no longer viable. City
Manager Dixon answered the official position of Caltrans is that they have concerns,
however they are willing to work with the City.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he has concerns about the cost recommended for
this project and asked if it would be prudent at this time to widen Ynez by only two
lanes. City Manager Dixon stated staff would prefer to develop the entire project at
one time.
Mayor Parks called a brief recess at 9:20 AM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:21 PM.
Councilmember Mur~oz stated he is anxious for undergrounding of utilities to take place
in the interest of aesthetics. Mayor Parks stated the undergrounding of utility lines
would cause a one year delay of the road project, which is an important need at the
present time.
Hinutes\09\10\91 -9- 09/18/91
City Council Minutes September 10, 1991
Councilmember Lindemans stated the undergrounding would not be a part of the Mello
Roos district and would have to come out of the general fund, which is too great a
burden for the City. Mayor Parks suggested that in the next bond issue, the City look
at undergrounding lines instead of delaying the Ynez Corridor project.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans that
the Ynez Corridor project be approved without underground the utility lines as part of
this project.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Birdsall asked when the six lane widening of Ynez will begin. City
Engineer Tim Serlet said the project would commence Spring of 1992. He stated,
however, that the Rancho California Water District has submitted plans to install a 48"
water line in Ynez Road con-current with the widening project, which might further
delay the project.
Hearing no objections from Council, Mayor Parks reordered the agenda to
accommodate those desiring to speak on Item No. 17.
17. Consideration of Funding for Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival
Dennis Frank, 37820 Spring Valley Road, President of the Temecula Valley Balloon and
Wine Festival Association, requested a grant of $50,000 as seed and sponsorship
money, to promote the 1992 Balloon and Wine Festival.
Nancy Maurice, 29405 Via Notre, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Board
Liaison, distributed a fact sheet showing the benefits the community derived during the
1990 Balloon and Wine Festival. She encouraged the City Council to participate in
making this event possible.
Leigh Engdahl, 41859 Corte Selva, Board Member, stated the Balloon and Wine
Festival is of great benefit to the community in generating interest for business and
future residents. She asked the Council to support this request.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed a concern regarding the status of the newly formed
corporation, stating all documentation must be completed before funds could be given.
She also questioned the copyright charge by the Chamber of Commerce to use the
Balloon and Wine logo.
Ninutes\Oq\lO\~l -10- 09/18/91
.... City Council Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
Councilmember Mur~oz stated he would be more in favor of a loan for $50,000, rather
than a grant. Councilmember Lindemans suggested matching funds of up to $50,000,
enabling the festival to receive more revenue.
Mayor Parks stated this event is very important to the City of Temecula and would be
in favor of providing seed money to help this corporation get started.
Councilmember Lindemans asked how much the fee for use of the Balloon and Wine
Festival name and trademark would be.
Leigh Engdahl, 41859 Corte Selva, stated this fee for use of the trademark is $20,000.
She stated for this fee the corporation would receive a successful festival and use of
space in the Tourist Center.
It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
provide $50,000 in the form of a loan, as seed money for the Temecula Valley Balloon
and Wine Festival Association with the intent that this loan is paid back if the festival
is successful.
Councilmember Lindemans withdrew the second.
Mayor Parks suggested providing $25,000 as a loan and $25,000 in matching funds.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Mayor Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to allocate
$25,000 in the form of a loan to the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival
Association and an additional $25,000 to be allocated in the form of matching funds
as seed money, with the requirement this will be funded at such time as all the legal
requirements for non-profit status have been met by the Association.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Mu~oz explained his "no" vote, stating he is concerned with the funds
the City continues to give away.
Ninutes\O~\10\91 -11- 0~/18/91
City Council Minutes
16.
Seotember 10, 1991
Consideration of Old Town Historic Review Committee
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall that the
guidelines be changed to allow a simple majority to appoint committee members.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore
NOES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Lindemans stated he would like to submit the names of Larry
Markham, Walt Allen, Tony Terrich, Nell Cleveland, Tony Tobin and Bob Morris for
consideration.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated like to submit the name of Christina Grina.
Councilmember Moore stated she is uncomfortable with this process when she does
not have any information regarding the people whose names have been submitted.
City Manager Dixon suggested continuing this matter for 30 days and appointing two
members of the Council to act as a screening board.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
appoint an ad hoc committee consisting of Councilmembers Lindemans and Moore and
City Manager Dixon will appoint a staff member, to review and screen the applications
for this committee and make a recommendation to the Council.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
None
None
Councilmember Mu~oz excused himself from the meeting at 10:33 PM.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon reported that the City is still negotiating with the County regarding fees
owed to the City and hopes that it will soon be coming to closure.
Ninutes\09\10\91 -12- 09/18/91
City Council Minutes September 10, 1991
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Moore asked the matter of 4/5ths majority to appoint committee members
be researched and possibly changed to a simple majority.
Mayor Parks requested that a resolution supporting the clearing of the Murrieta Creek be
placed on the next agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn
at 10:40 PM to a meeting on September 24, 1991 at 7:00 PM. The motion was unanimously
carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Hinutes\O9\lO\fl -1]- 0~/18/91
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of
$1,136,737.31
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 241h day of September, 1991.
ATTEST:
Ronald I. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Resos 2 11
LL el
0
C,) ,_Z
"'1
n"
v
UJ
-r
_1
0
Z
(..) 0
LU ILl
fl-
y
0
"I'
,_1
0
LU
-1"
_1
0
"'!
rr
,,~
(,~
UJ
"I-
_
Z
0
0
I.~
Z
ILl
I.L
0
_.1
_1
0 0
a
Z Z
LU UJ
0
,_1 ,_1
_1 ,_1
0 0
U, U_
ell LU
LU LU
a3 133
LU LU
LU LU
Invoice Date F/O r:~te Description Sross Discount Net
~ ......1HARRINGT HARRiNGTON KEVIN
~95091 eL, So/9! ~9/86/91 MILEAGE REIMB ~!12-8/14
Check Totals:
80007829 89/12/91 HENRY HENRY, WARY JANE
878191 07i81f9! 89i111911RAVEL REIMB.
4~.15 8.88 40.15
48.15 8.08 48.!5
55,67 0.88 35,67
88087858 89112/91 IEM ! E M
69[-11 e7i0119i 8282
691-llA 87/8!/91 10857
Check Totals:
04/81/91 PERSONAL MANAGEMENT jUNE SERV
87/81/91 CLOSE OUT JUNE 91SERV.
55.67 8.88 55.~7
247,82 0.88 247.82
182.18 0.08 102.18
Check Totals:
80887851 09/12/911NLANOD2 INLAND DISPOSAL~ INC
846287 08!26t91 88/25/91 881750615ERV. SEPT
846589 88/25191 88i25t91 88219~2/SEPT SERVICE
820298 88/25/9i 88/25/91 6012542ISEPT SERV.
846682 88!25i91 88/25191 9825517!8i!-9/3~
49.78 8.08 49.78
598.28 0.80 598.28
128.88 0.80 120.88
298.~5 8.80 298.65
Check Totals:
880078~2 89/12/91 INTERINS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
..... b:.~,~i 08129/9! ANNLAL DUeS/JUNE GREE~
75.08 8.08 75,08
00887855 09!12/91JMSHAM
24950
24815
Check Totals:
J.M. SHAMROCK INC.
871~I/9! 18452 06i18/9! LANDSCAPE ROCK & DELIVERY
07/81/9! 10452 86i18i91 LANDSCAPE ROCK & DELIVERY
75.80 0.00 75.08
60.55 0.00 68 '~
5!.5~ 0.08 5i.50
88007834 09/12191JOBSAVAI ~OBS AVAILABLE
~8~ 0872~/91 I8711
Check Totals:
Check Totals:
~087835 89i12/91JOINTPOW jOINT POWERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
~:~,. 87/25i91 10737 ~7/25/91 REVISE SCHEDULE:FLE>~ ~ENE:7
les.sB 8.08 I85.88
82,58 0,08 ~2,5~
Ch~ck Totals:
80087936 09/!2/9! JRFREEMA J. R. FREEMAN CO., [NC
41287 08!22/9i 10605 08i06i91 iBM TYPEWRITER COVERS
82.58 ~.00 S2.58
~ ~8 0.00 55.88
C~.eck Totals:
.: KiDSPART KiDS PARTIES.EiC.
891491 89/14/91 89/87/91 ENTERIAINMENT MOMMY & E
45,00 0.80 45.8~
~9/!2/91 KINKO'S KINKO=S COPIES
1855 87/~Ii91 10696
1888 87/01!91 10696
2651 88/~5/91 10658
Check Totals:
07i81191 DRILLED >HOLED PAPER
87/81/91 DRILLED S-HOLED PAPER
08/!6/91 8 !/2 X 1!; CARDSlOCK PAPER
45.88 ~.08 45.8~
83.!~ ~.80 85.16
58.88 8.80 38.88
385.96 8.8~ 5~5.96
2:.2,7S:o ""~ ......' !~,NF-'RT' PERTILl
+(
55471. ~'.",-8/9i 18725
427.2~ 8.~ 427.2~
28~78~0 ~9/12/9i LEAGUE-2 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
C~ec~ E;ats Ven~r
' ~"~ ~'10 Date Description Sros~ Discount
invoice L .... .--.
Chsck Totals: 95.80 e.8~
~88~7S4! ~S/12/~fLORENZ,A [ORENZ,AL~AOEFF~LUDIN & O6SEL
~81491 OS/14/9! ~8/14/91 CREDIT/SUBSCRiPTION FEES 45.00 ~.8~
Check Totals:
088~7842 89/12/9! MARtLYNS MARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE
!~95 091~9/9! I~5~I 08115191 COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR KITCHEN
Me9 ~9i!~/91 18651 88/16/91 COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR KITCHEN
i718 89/~9/91 1~651 ~811~/91 COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR KITCHEN
1677 99185191 !~6i5 88111191 COFFEE SUPPLIES
45.8~ 8.80 45,ee
4!.20 B.8~ 41.20
.... 8.a Is -~
0
193.95 8.89 !9Z.95
84.2~ 8.89 84.2~
Check Totals:
~9/12!9! MCGAVRAN LORR! ANN MCGAVRAN
981991 88/!9/9! 88/19/91 MILEAGE REIMB 7/!-7/51
99~59! ~9183/91 ~9!03/9! MILEAGE REIM8 8!9!
557.75 8.80 557.75
64.98 e.e~ 6~.99
77.28 0.8~ 77.25:
80807844 ..... '~'
~?,~=,.~ MOOREPEG PEG MOORE
08509! ~8/5U9!
easegl-1 98158/9!
Check Totals:
98/59!91 EXP REIMB./MA!N ST WKSHOR
~8i39/91REIMB STAMPS/PHONE
!42.18 8.80 142,18
5!.45 9.8~ 5!.43
~/12/91 NELSON SHAWN NELSON
~,.l~,l ~7/18/9!
881991 88/19/9!
Check Totals:
~71~I/91 EXPENSE RE!MB.
~S/19/9! EXPENSE REINS 8/!4 LUNCH
23.6~ e.B~ 2~.6e
24.15 8.~ 24.!5
Check Totals:
~8~87546 ~9/!2/91 NEWPORT NEWPORT WAVE SOFTWARE
6~6~b ~8!28/91 19597 ~8/14t91SERVIqES 8/I>8/!6
47.75 8.89 47.75
~'>/9~ PESTMAST PESTMASTER SERVICES
882991 88/29/91 18497 8i/17/91 INITIAL TREATMT & I YR MAINT
!40.80 8.90 140.0~
~887848 09/I2/91F'ETTYC PETTY CASH
~9!591 ~9i13i9!
~8279! 88/27/9!
Check Totals:
09/06/q~ REINS/CITY ~:1~-~/~
8/27f91 RE!MB TCSD
!67.85 9.80 i67.85
!48.76 8.00 1~0.76
~0097849 89/i2/9i, PHONEMAN THE PHONE MAN
1,~, U101191 !B345
Check Totals:
84/29/91 INSTALL WIRING/MAY 15
5~7.81 8.08 ~87.81
99.88 0.00 99.99
PROLOCK PRO LOCK & KEY
~;~ 88/~2/9! 18541
2275CR 98/92191
Check Totals:
87/01/91REKAYABLE LOCKS AT PARKS
88/92/91 CREDIT MEMO/!NV. EXCEED P.O.
99.80 8.99 99,0~
225.g5 Lee 225.~5
55 ~x- 9.~9 55.25-
0e5765
Check Totals:
C:B/2~/9! !~5~..s Z'L'~9,'~I STAMPS:ENGRAVING BADGES
.t,=..: ~,;~;~:.: ..~=r ...... H.. BADGES
"~ ~= !67.S5
45.59 ~.90 45.09
272.62
552.88 8.88 ~SZ.S~
':~ec~ Tctais:
Na~e
Invoice Date F'/O Date Descri;ticr, Gross Discount Net
~70151 87i~I/91 ~118 II,'15/9~ 15 YiOTICES/~UNE 675.~ ~.88
' Check Totals: 875.80 8.80 675.80
808~7855 ~9/12/91SCHAEFF SCHAEFFER'S NIjRSERY
2~018 07/26/91 1~565 ~7/25/9! COMPOST'F'~RRIWINKLE 119.17 ~.~ !19.19
Check Totals:
8~7854 89112/91SCHUMACH SCHUMACHER AUTO SALE & LEASIN
1165DM 07/~I/91 1~699 87/~I/9! SALES TAX FOR P.O. ~18297
!19.19 8.88 !19.!9
I79.84 8.80 179.84
880~7855 89/12t91SCMAF SCMAF
~8279! 89189191 89/89/91
Check Totals:
REGISTRATIONS FOR TEA~S
179.84 8,88 179.84
88~87856 89i12/91 SECURITY SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
0799A 87/81/9! 87/81/9!
88568 88/81/91 08i81/91
07738 88/81/9! 88/81191
88~98 88181/91 88/~1/9i
88238 88/84i91 88/~4/91
Check Totals:
BAN
4798-e288-8881-e799/JULY CH8
4798828888818856/AU8 CHGS
4798-8288-8881-8775/AU8 CHG
4798-~288-8881-8849/AU8 CHG
4798-B28~-~O~I-~B25/JULY CH8
336.88 8.88 336.0~
46.86 8,88 46.86
26.84 8.88 2184
535.18 8.88 535.18
i~5.59 8.88 i6Z.59
682.45 8.~8 682.45
Check Totals:
~8~87857 89/!2/91SLEETER WILLIAM SLEETER
07~1~i 87/~1/91 ~7/~I/91 6/15-7/15/ADDF:ESS!NG
Check Totals:
88~7858 09/12/9! SO CAL-2 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
349-34388 08/07/9! 08i87/91 714-349-3438/JULY CHES
345-7422A 87/89/91 ~7/89/91 714-345-7422/JULY CHGS
345-74228 ~8/~7/91 88/8719! 714-545-T422/JULY CHG
1,454.92 ~.~8 I~454.92
515.8~ 8.~8 ~ ~
5i5.08 8.8~ 5!5.00
I~1.15 8.80 181.15
42.49 8.8~ 42.49
80007861 89/~2/91SOUTHCED SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
A85572155'~ ~/8!/91 ~' ,.z-87/81/~I
A28843656¥~7~t/91
A288434543 87/81/91 ~7/81/9!
A288444988 87/81/91
Check Totals:
457787752~9~2/5/31-6/3~
43778775162~2/5/31-6/58
:43779775!6982/5151-6/3o
45771775159~2 5/31-5/3~
A3117722 87/81/91 07/81/91 437"/17714&5ii 5t31-6/58
885759854::~i8181/t'~.~ 88/81/91 .t.377877524811 6/3f,-7/,.ii
B2iB4469B~.~il/q)l%`r ":~"~8!al/9I ~Sllmli/s159gZ a/si-Tnaz
B2884~65'6F~B/!l'IVF ...... 88/!1191'4377177516212 6/38-7131
85387957:~:!8111~1. 88/a1191.
A5,19139I-'.". 97/61191 e7/81191
BNI8518549 98/01/91 98/01/91
88~6745~7 ~8/~1/91 08/~1/91
BB&85179,~-~181~I19t~-': " ~B181/91
B855721F~.i~IBIiLlgL~- 88/i119L
B2B3565&. 88/81R1 88/81191
82~84S454~ 881~1191 88/81/91
85-591381 88/81t9I 08/~1i91
85117722 ~8/81i91 e8/01/~1
BN105!8~82 0818!/91 08/~i/9!
A8685179 87/81/9! 0~/81/91
A856~4587 87/~I/91 ~7/~1/91
AN185!8569 ~7/81/9! ~7/~1/91
JUNS~':~~° ~/~I/91
186,76 0,e0 186,76
27.48 e,8~ -
29.25
28.56 B.88
29.42 e. Be
96.18
32,81
52.69
16.75 8.8e
14.~8 8.~8
38.58 ~.~
29.48 e.i~.--
~8.7&
26,27 ~.~8
~!.7~
I147
25.75 0.8~
26.7?
....
0.80
27,48
29,25
'28,56
29,42
23,35
%,18
32,81
-32,69
16.75
14,68
121.~7
3~.58
29.48 --
36,76
26,27
51.75
!5.47
25.75
3i.95
26.79
27.65
;.:::. EE" .;: Zr, ez. ;,e{Lgz~r Ezzzlz-'
Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Descriution Gross Discount Net
88797~29 08108/91 08/08/9! 55771267981~58885 7/5-B/5 9.5~ ~.0~ S.38
35884~551 ~8106/9! ~8/~6!9i 55778~618!IB~88~7 ~-~'~ 8,78 ~.88 8.78
A3884846i 07/08t9! 07/~8/91 55778~61811838887 6t>7i2 8.70 0.8~ 820
.,o~,~.~ 88/~8191 88/88191 557712685~8~28884 7i5-8i5 '?.:e 8.08 9.38
BP~8~1~083 88/86i9~ 88/~6!91 53778132184~18~84 7/2-8/2 1,256.88 ~.80 1.256.80
BP88268829 88/S6/91 88/86/91 5~7781~112fi~8884 7/2-8!2 1~267.87 0.8~ 1~267.87
AN17812812 87!25/91 87125191 667748586778288~2 6/28-7122 221.82 8.8~ 221.82
8208~3454! 88/84/9t 88/04191 5377888!4~1828868 7/2-8/~ se~.ee 8.ee ~e!.ee
~88695745 87!81/91 87/01!91 68774117678628887 5iN-8/12 9.08 0.80
88814825 08/28191 88/28/91 ~9776781851820~82 7/24-8/24 259.72 ~.8~ 259.72
8288843mle 88123/9! 88/2~/91 687758589008288~I 7/22-8119 !95.87 0.88 !95.87
8N17812012 88t23/91 88/23/91 687748~B677820062 1122-8119 284.~4 e.e8 284.34
885882944 88123/91 88123191 ~67779~84~2038889 7122-8/!9 58.56 8.0~ 50.56
985484518 88123191 88125/91 6617795~4828S0809 7122-8/!9 8,40 e,e8
BN18501846 88125/91 08/25/91 66777958088048008 7/22-8/19 8,40 8,08 8,40
A388545275 87112/9! 87112191 57775~990882~884 6/7-7/9 9.~8 8,88 9.68
8588545275 88112/9! 88112191 57770~9980828804 7/9-8/7 58,67 0.88 38,87
885694574 88112191 88/12/9! 85777058954820884 7/151816 6,68 8,00 6,68
8288366948 ~81~6191 88186191 55778008253828885 712-8!I 9.88 8,~8 9.80
8288586957 88/0~/91 88i06i91 537788~66590300~7 112-8/1 9,12 e,80 9.12
A8695745 ~7/17/91 07/17/91 68774117678828887 6112-7/I1 8,78 0,00 8,78
82~8~46989 88/!4/9! ~8fI4/91 5977416238702~086 7/!1-8/9 64.~9 8.~8 64.39
85-6745888 ~8126/91 88126i91 67778659414020~82i712>8/28 255.91 0.88 255.91
Check Totals:
89/12/9i SOUTHCOS SOUTH COAST PROMOTION GROUP
4151 08128/91 18284 85i16i91 COFFEE CUPS
5,856,12 8,80 ~ 8~ 1~
468.19 8.88 4~8.19
Check Totals:
8~8878~4 89i!2!9! STOFFELS STOFFEL'S FLORIST
~82891 08128i9! ~8,'28191 FLOWER ARRANGEMENT/DIXON MTHR
468.19 8.00 468.19
64.97 ~.08 64.97
-:. · -.. Check.Totals:-
0~807865 09/12!91 SUNDANCE SUNDANCE STAGE LINES? INC,
42855 8~18719I '- 891~7191 BUS TRIP/ENSENA~A
Ched Totals:
80887866 89/12!91TE~ PIPE TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE
14798 88/23/91 !6574 88/26/91 IRRIGATION PARTS;TCS~ REPAIRS
~57 081071~1 ~0445 ~TII5191 ~AINTEHA~CE EQUIPMEN[, TCSO
i~58!' ....08~fi9~851~: !~:07/~]19[:ITBS USED:'OHiEIERBbt SAT
- ' ~4724 .....;-081~/9ri0574: :: 08i28R~' [RRISATIOi PARTS;TCSD RE~AtRS
14452. 20812~19110574 .. 0812ilg1. IRRIGAllOH PARTS;ICSO REPAIRS
1~755 08/20/91 18574 88120/9~ IRRIGATION PARTS;TCSD REPAIRS
15147 8813~191 16574 ~8/2~/911RRIBATIO, PARTS;TCSD REPAIRS
13752 8812619~ ~8574 ~812~i9~ [RRIGAHOH PAR/S;TCSD REPAIRS
64.97 0.88 84.97
168.~8 8.8~ 168.08
1~8.08 ' 8.80 " 168.08
47,06
155,91
&5,4I
199.79
24,92
7.89
195,75
8,80 47,~8
0.88 155.91'
e.ee .... '
8.08 199.79
0,80 24.92
0.08 7.09
8.00 195,75
- ,: - Check,Totals: : ......:. .........- ....
08887887 89112191 TEMCULAT TEHECULA TOWNE ASSOC -:-,-
882",9[ 88/29t9~ 6227 . e;ISllO, I.RE~ISEPT 18-!7-24i~H
Check TotalS:
~=~" ~/~2f9~ THQRNHIL GARY
872591 ~7i25/91 87/25191 REIMB PLAN MNGE CONFERENCE
762,29 ........ 8,88_ _ 762.29
635.75
34.91 ~.~8 34.91
Check Totals:
.~.~,~.,o:.- e~/12/?I UNIGLC'BE U~!SLOBE BUTTERFIELD 'RAVEL
54.9!
Check To:ais: =,. 00 294.00
00007870 09/12191UNIONLE, UNION LAKO TITLE
19825 07/01/91 !8,715 07/01/9~ ESCRO~ TITLE POLICY RE?ORT
Check Totals:
~00U87i e9/!2/91 UNITED UNITEC WA~ OF THE INLAND
2UNIT.4~ 07118191 07118191 Normal Payroil~7118 20.00 0.0~ 20.80
2UNIT.46 88i01191 0S/~1i9: Normal Payroll,8/i 20.00 0.00 2~.00
2UNIT.47 08t15i9i ~8!!5/91 Normal Payroli,8/!5 20.00 0.00 2~.~0
2UNIT.48 08i29i91 08129i91 Normal Payro[l,~/29 20.00 0.00 20.00
400.00 0.0~ ~00.00
Check Totals: 80.00 0.00 80.00
0711219! VALLEY VALLEY OFFICE PRODUCTS
11565 08/26/91 10568 07/28/91 OFFICE SUPPLIES; TCSD 15.68 0.00 15.68
Check Totals: 15.68
00007875 091['2/9! XEROX-! iEROX
144562259 ~7/02/~1 106~'2 07/0119! SERVICE "A~ Le'F~O~ 10~ 250.00
00007874 89/12/91ZIMMERLE STEVE ZIMMERLE
092891 09/28i91
Chec~ TotaLs: 250,00 ~,00 25~,~g
08115i91 MILEAGE RE!MB/8/2-8/25 28,2~ 0.00 28.20
Check Totals: 28.20 0.00 2~.20
Report Totals: 60 ~39 1~ 0.00 6e,259.19
Yz~raL fe~'-: L::Z t':- :~:.E:- Et~t;;-,;
09/!8/9! MORRISON MORRISON & FOERSTER CONFEREfC "
881591 08116i9i ~:Bi!6/9! REIMB/RiVERSiDE CHF'TR [CBO I8.8~ 0.08 1~.0~
Check Totals: I~.0~ 8.0~ !0.8E
88007876 09/1i/9! ALLCITY ALL CIT~' MANAGEMENT
185~ 07/15/~I 07/15/91 ~z~-71 ~ CONTRO~
.,. 1... TRA;FIC 255.7~ 8.00 255.78
1~59 0~i2919i ~'i~i91 7/2~/TRAFFiC CONTROL ~.SE ~.0~ I17.88
Check lota!s:
88887877 09/15/9! ANTNON-2 PHILIP L ANTHONY. INC
8BSe9i 08/86/9! ~!19 11/27/90 EF'ANSION SOi/THRU JUlY !99!
353.64 0.~8 553.64
5.937.5~ 0.~0 5,957.5~
08887878 89/!5/91BEAUDOIN LINQA BEAUDOIN
e02891 ~8/20/9!
Check Totals:
08/20/9i REIMB/COFFEE MAKER
. ~ .~ 5~937.5~
3!.24 0.80 3t.24
e~007879 09/15/91 BERG MARK BERG
C31~91 88/16/9!
Ch~ck Totals:
~8'15/9! RE!MB/ICBO MEETING
5!.24 0.00 51.24
Ie.80 0.~0 18.0~
Chsck Totals:
~007880 89/15/9! BOGRAPH! BOGRAPHiCS PRINTTN~
0~i~29 ~7/0!/91 I~67~ U/0i/9i BUS.CARDS:ENVELOPES;ARTWCRK
8C~29-D U/81~91 1~674 07/01/9i BUS.CARDS:ENVELOPES:ARTWOR~
t0.00 0.00 10.0e
~7~61 ~c/~3'91 3~LiF.A~ %LIFOR~!A LANDSCAPE
Check Totals:
E7/~!./92 IC~7~ C'.'~i/gi jbLi:~Ai<T,?,~RL:~[ HZCiZ~
~7/~i?i !0~78 6>01/9! MAINT.ViLL A~ANTi ASSOC.jUq
07/01/91 10672 07/81/91 VILLAGES ii MAINT.POR jUNE
Z7/8i/9! i~675 87/~i/91MAiNT. VETERANS PARK: jUNE
{7/~i/~I i~o77 ~7/~!?i hAi!4T.RIDGEV!E~ TRACT:jCq
CT/Zi'91 ~21: e~/01/91 JULY MA!NT
3,478.~2 0,0~ 3.47G.02
eS/Z,'Si 6AL!FGRN CALIFORNIAN
5255%79~ 8G/02/91 !8626 ~7i81/9!
4858/9592 07/5i/9~ i~626 ..... ~'
'~ ....... 10626 19!
,~.~.,;.,~ 89!19/91 871~I
4702/~65 08/01/91 ~0~26 ~7/0t/91
752: 08105/91 i062~
68/i2.,'9~ ~9S26 07/01/9~
87i8!/9! !0478 06128,/91
07/29/91 ~062~
il.:,":'j,l~c87/25/7i ie62~ . c .
.....
~':'~' ~7/~i/~i ~2~ ~=~'/'~'
5.14~ C7..'21/9i i~2i ~7/C1/91
c2C;.ii~55 ST/hAST i,%li ~7/eliSl
Check Totals.:
NOTICES/8/>8,'2 ..... rLR~'
NOTiCES/CiTY CLRK/8ii/92
NOTiCES/CITY CLRKIB/!9/91
NOT!CES/CiT~ CLRK/8/1/91
NOTiCES/CITY CLRK/8/5/9i
NETiCES/CITY ri~='/~;'~-~
NOTICES/CI~> CLRK/7/17/91
NOTICES/CITY CLRK/S/9/~i
FULL ~ AD RE: TAX ASSEK~
NOTiCES/7/25.=~i
NOT!CES/7/21-T/25
N3TICES/7/9/t
N6TiCES/7/i~.41
0.00
89.8.T 8.08 .......
I!3,4~ ~.~O !il,iz
84.79 ~.00 84.7:
%.17 a ~ 94.4:
,cv 0.00 34.85
24.7E. ~.g~ 14.'E
!55.1S C ~ .....
Cr:e:~ T-:%sls: 1.cT4.% '~,e? t':':,:;
z'S[;_: :'=_Er; t;':'2 2-,'=':. ;ESZEZ.-"
Checi: Date Ver,~s- fiats
Invoice Date P/O Date Descriotion 8ross Discount
'~'~7883 e9/15/9i CASTtLLO ANGELA DEL CASTiLLO
290991 eq/eD/91 e9/~9/9i REFUND/SWIM LESSON~ 7.5~ e.e~
08~8788~ 29/!5/9! CASTRO,K KAREN CASTRO
883e91 08/30/9z
Check Totals: 7.58
28/~019! MILEAGE REIMB 54.!8 e.Ge 34.18
Cnec~ Iota[s: 54.ie ~.Ge ~4.18
2e0~7885 e9/13/91CRAIN CYNTHIA CRAIN
~9~991 ~9/89/91 ~9/e9/9i REFUND/SWIM LESSONS 28.2~ ~.2~ 2~.8~
Check Touals: 2~.00 8.28 2~.00
0~7886 ~9/13/91DAVLIN DAVLIN
89-2~:1!8 ~8/22/9! 1~46~ ~7/21/9! AUG 22 MEETING 15e,~2 e.o~ 15~,8e
o,-~.~:109 88127191 !~65 ~718!191 TAPING 8127 MEETING 662,18 0,88 662,18
CheO~ Totals: 792.I0 8.Oe 792.10
00287887 29/15/91 DAYTON ~ENNiFER DAYTON
29~99! 09/89/9! e9/e9/91 REFUND/SWIM LESSONS 57.5~ 0.00 37~50
Check Totals:
09/!5/9i EASTERNM EASTERN MUNICIPAL 'WATER DiSTR
~91191 ~9/II/9! ~',~/o~ SEWER
37.5e ~.8~ 37.50
7.!95.8~ 8.~
Check. Totals:
~878~9 09/ ..... ENTERPRI ENTERPRISE Pc~T ..... "'c
88585? e7/8i./91 le:28 e4,.'io,,e: RENTALi4/le/9!-6/28/9!
7,195.0~ ~ ~ 7.195.2e
. ~,~'
I,i25.32 B.88 1.12S.32
177.S5- 8.2e 177.8~-
i~.45 B.O~ 18.15
:heCi: Totals:
GE.:2:/~i REFUND/DEPOE[~ FOP ;:ESTRC~~
jOHN
~7!99i
Check Totai~:
jOHN P.
B~/1~91
87/19/91 ""~
5~.~ ~,0~ 5e,O~
Check Totals:
?7.50 e.ee 97.5~
~,c.~ e9'!3," i:.LEIriFEL KLEINFELDEF
Check Tot.sis:
97.50 2.~ ~7.58
Ch_=.-.!
~- ,,,!iiN.,,,~<
aS2"9: EY}'St;:E:E ;:E:r..:n ......F'ESC;:.':ZEE
41,35 e e.~.
_, . '. ;zz C' 'SE'EC,.E -::£
D-t~ "'~ Date Description Gross. DZscouat Net
08/29/9! B8/29/91 REFUND/SWIMMING LrS¢O~!: 25.B~ 8.00 25.e~ "~'
CheO Totals: 25.80 ~.~8 25.0e
~9.":~/91MACKSNZ: MACKEnZiE LANDSCAPE
677i gT/~i/Ul ~236 ~7/01/9i JUNE SERVICES 7SE:,~ 8.0~ 7B~.27
67!~ e7ieY~i 023~ 07101191 JUNE SERVICES 700.~0 0.B0 788,8~
6721 g71e:rgl 823~ 0710!t9i JUNE SERVICES 360.e0 e.oe 36e.~e
E. 7~ eT/8!/Sl 8'2~t 87/8!/9! JUNE SERVICES 145.8~ 8.8~ ~45.ei
677e 87/eI/91 e256 ~7/8!/91 ~UNE SERVICES 150.72 0.88 !5~.72
67!~ 07/01/9i 8256 ~7/81/9! JUNE SERVICES 499.5e 8.88 499.58
67~9 07i8t/9i 825~ ~)7/0!191 jUNE SERVICES 28~.00
7088 ~8!26/91 8208 ~710~/9! "U~UST
w ~ MAINT. 45.~5 8.0~ 45.85
7887 08128/91 e2e8 e7t01/91 AUGUST MAINT 54.45 8.B0 54.45
7886 e8/28/9! ~208 ~7/e~/9~ AUGUST SERVICES 248.48
7084 e°m°z°~ ~20S ~7i8!!Si AUGUST MAINT 12~.55
7~85 08/28,'~: ¢288 ~7/0~/91 AUGUST MA[NT 8~.85
706~ 08/51/Y! ~2e8 ~7/~I/91 AUGUSI MAINT 525.~8 ~.80 525.~0
7~65 88/51/% e28G ~7/0!I9! AUGUST MAINI 265.e8 8.e0 265.08
7059 eB/2S/91 0288 87/01/~! AUGUST MAINT 7~8.88 0.80 7~E.~
70~i eS/28,,'9i ~2~S .~7/~I/91 AUGUST MAINT 900.~e ~.00 908.~e
70~2 ~'~.,o,o, ~,o ~oo =~ 0.00 499.5e
~o,;~..; ~. 07!01/91 AUGUST MAINT ....
7063 0S','2=Z~% B2~S ~'0 .... AU~US' SERVICES I ~ ~
7~84 ~o,~c.,o, ~208 B7/~i/9I AUGUST MAINT 775.e8 8.08 775.0~
7~56 88/~B/gl ~207 ~7/8!/91 AUGUST MAtNT 1,62~.~0 ~.BO 1,628.08
706? 8E'/ZS.'~! ~:~; ,=.a .'~i ,,~.:cT SERV '~ ~ 0 0' !40.~
1.252.8~ ~.SB i.'25Z.8C
55~.2c O.BO 550.j
evens! e.:./eG,s': e,:../e;.:9~ REFUNDiSWi)i LESSONS
0~/13/~i ONESTEP
JULY
AUG
ONE STEP MAiNT & .... ~ ......CO
e7/8i/S! g214 ~7/0i/91 jANITORiAL SER'V./jUL'~ SEF:V.
68/81/9i ,,',i ~
~;., ~7i~i/9L jANiTORiAL SERV.iAUGUS:
87/~9~91 ~""~"' CREDIT Mch~r','~r:cD ?.n.
25.0~ O.~e 25.0~
:.871.00 ~.0~ 1,871.8~
la~.~e ~.oe 166.ec
Checi Totals:
~00C7963 ~"~ .... 11 iR~I~TI~
3~2:3E. C7/C:'?: i¢56C ~7.'Ci/9'1 iRF:iG~TiD~ S;.'=P:=!EE/jUNE
3e31:7 e:~ei.'.:: ie>il C7/3i~?i ROTORS: ADjUSTAE'LE:TCSD
::.be.:> To:ill:-:
;NORE ::At.t DES: F-'~l..'..
1.737.S3 e.ec I,'737.E1
1,37S "~ ~.~' ' "" '=
~,.'~,t'
21.94 ~.{:8 21.9:
~,=_, tc::-l=_: 'ZT.:..'= C.t "'=
FLAG POLE 2.~!4.7~ ~.68 2.~I~.71
Che.:,,. Teta!s: 2,014.74 0.00 2,8!4.7!
g572 88;i8/91 1~o~ 0, ~ DOOR SiGN:POLiCE DEPART. 70,04 0.8~ 70.04
Check Totals: 78.04 8.0C,, 7g. Oi
00087907 09/13/9! SMITH.? PHiLLiP O. SMIT~
.e8!5~! 88/!5/91 eB"!5/9! RE!MB/ICBO MEETING 12.0~ 0,08 12.0~
Check Totals:
00~07968 09/!3/9! TEMPUT!L TEMPORARY UTILiT~ SERVICES
882691 8~m6~o' e8/2~~' REFUND/BUILDING PERMIT
!2,0~ 0,2- 12.00
545.00 0,00 545.80
Check Totals:
00087909 09/~3.'9! W~mcnc'~ WINDSOR SONSTRUST'm
09!19! 07/!i/~I 09,'!I/9! ADDIT. WORK BUILD
545.0~ 0.~
Chec~ Tn~l:
000~7~i~ 0~/14/~ C&CGRAVS C & C GRADING AN~ PAVi~G
08/19/9i 822i 07/8!/91 STREET MAiNT.&ROAD REPAIR
4,5i7.9~ ~.00 4,5i7.94
00007915 09/24/9! HANKSHAR HANKS HARDWARE
" .... e%:'24/9i Ie695
954i:. :" ....': 10695
95276 C7/IS,'9Z
'?..~23c: 07/03;9i !~9~
98546 GS/g71~i 10415
98iL: ~7/62/91
98844 88/08/% I~4!5
Ie28i6 88/27i9i 10415
~ ....~ ~;/28191 10415
i~g~"fZ ~ ........ ~,~.
101753
i~;c~,; .....
~i~:. '
:'759: ~E:.'21/:'I 10655
9963c ~i"2!/ci
:;sS~
Chec~ Totals:
07/C1,'9! HARDWARE !TE~S:CITY MOVE
g7/~1/91 HARDWARE iTEMS:UTY
87/e1;9! HARDWARE iTEMS:CiTY MOVE
e7/'~ ,o fT;~c.rlfv MOu:
,~,,.i HARDWARE
,~,,~ HARDWARE :TE~A.CzTv
~7/~I/9! HARDWARE iTENS:CITv
8r/~i"t ~ARDWAF:S [TENS=CITY MOVE
HARDWARE ITEMS:CITY MOVE
HARDWARE iTEMS;CiT",.' MOVE
TOOLS FOR STREET MAINT,
TOOLS FOR STREET ~,AtNT.
?nri: FOR STREET ~A[NT.
· ,.n .......,--'T~.:rr ~AINT.
TOOLS FnR CTRZ,-rT
U ...... MAINT.
TOOLS: FOR STREET NAiNT.
ACCOUNT;REPAiR ITEMS'. CiT~
ACCOUN~ ;REPAIR
..... ~u,~=.r.:r.:r ITEMS; :LET(
~CCOUNT~REPAIR iTEMS~ CiT',.'
~CCOUNTF:EPAIR
~CEOUNT~F<SPAiF' iTEmS; ::T'~
A~:CnUNT;REPA;F' iTP'~ '::T',
~i'.S': .:-'EF"AZF: on, ,c .......--.'-
i",:2-,C.F:EPAZ:-. EGijiF'~E!,j!T:F
r.;:...n.:~-H::. EG::iF'HErZ7 :'CS:.
Y:I-'-..:.PS..'-"A::
4,317.9~ 0,00 4,317.94
~ ~ g.Og !3.66
i8.1~- ~.08
14,7! e.ee 14.7:
17.!'~ ~,00 17.1~
:.12 ~,e~ ',12
3.71 ~.~2 5.77
522.84 ~.0~ 322.~4
18.i0 g.~[' ':' 52
· ~ ~.,4c
i44.2! ~ "~ ~i ~',
7o.87 ~.8~ 76.87
.,.=
52.~- t,00 52"
ss.sc e.ee 5:.sc
· ,~..-.. g.O¢ 30.49
.... .,~
7.5C :.~2
S .7C C.~{
::, :' ~ C, 0 {' 'E. S:
Invoice ~a~e P,'O Date Description Gro~s Discount Net
o~ 88/21/91 18655 88/21/91MtSC.REPAIR SLiUiPMENT:TSSD i~ ~ 11.~5
...... ~.88 '
9878~ 83/2t/91 19655 88/21/91MISC.REPAIR EQUIPMENT:TCSD 69.56 8.8~ 6~.56
~4~ e'r ~o, I8655 88/2i/9! MISC.REPAIR EOUIPMENT:TCSD ~5.09
~5~2 0~/~''~' !~55 O~z~l MISC.REPA[R EQUIPMENT:TCSD 5.76 8.88
98278 ~8/21i9i 18555 08121191 MISC.REPAIR EQUIP~ENT;TCS[~ 25.49 0.8~
182854 08/27/91 1~655 ~8/21191MISC.REPAIR EQU[PMENTITCSD 28.58 0.88 28.~8
97415 87131/91 18~55 88/21i91MISC.REPAIR EGUIPMENTITCSD 2.68 8.86 2..~
~7592 ~8/21/91 18655 88/2!igl MISC.REF'AIR E~UIPMENTiTCS~ 9.48 8.00
97491 88/21i9! 18555 88i2!!91MISC.REPAIR EOUIF'~ENT:TCSD 22.4~ 8.~8 22.4~
99~89 08121/91 10555 88121191 ~ISC.REPAIR E~UIPMENT~TCS~ 18.55 8.08 18.55
008077!4 ~9124i9! ORANGE
8818873
Check Totals:
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERV!C
88128191 18555 88/~2/91ST.STRIPINGIREPA!R;STENC!LS
88/28/91 !85~4 88/15/91 LAYOUT ~ PAINTISANO BLAST
4,998.B~ 8.8~ 4.998.e~
999.~8 8.08 999.8~
88887915 8gi24iGiSIMMONS
89849>!
Check Totals:
BECKY MCLEAN SIMMONS
89/84/91 18658 88/2!/91 4-DAY COMPUTER TRAINING CLASS
5,997,88 8.e~
i,788.88 8.88
Check Totals:
Report Totais:
!I~,751.~8 ~.80 i!8,78i.88
"i
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
85/~1/9~ es/el/91 mAY LA~ ENFORCEmEnT SE~:V.
Chec~ To;als:
Re;oft Totals:
Z72,794.S! :.~; 272.7:;.5L
Cheo. Date VenOor Name
invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
88887918 89/16/91 ALLCITY ALL CITY MANAGEMENT
1838 87/29/91 8247 87181191 TRAFFIC CONTROL/7/14-7/27 3,982.&6 8.88 5,982.66
1827 87115/91 8247 87/81/91 TRAFFIC CONTROLiGi38-7/13 4,361.56 8.88 4,361.5&
1859 88/26/71 8247 87t81/91 TRAFFIC CONTRDLIOIlt-B/24 3,784.88 8.88 3,784.80
Check Totals: 12,849.82 8.88 12,849.82
88887919 89116/71CPRS CA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY
891691 89/16/91 89116191 REGISTRATION/WORKSHOP 88.~8 8.88 88.88
Check Totals:
89/16/91 LEAGUE-2 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
891191 89/11/91 89/I1/91REBIST/CDNF. SAN FRANCISCO
88.88
1,238.88
88887921 8911&191 PESTMAST PESTMASTER SERVICES
883191 88/31/91 8256 87/81/9!
875~91 07/38/91 0256 87/81/91
Check Totals:
PARK RODENT CONTROL/AUG SERV.
RODENT CONTROL/JULY SERVICES
1,258.98 8.89
1,550.08 0.80 1,558.88
88887924 87/16/91RANCHWTR RANCHO WATER
8194272884 88/07/91 88/87/91
8186279~84 88/87/91 88/17/91
0194638854 08/87191 ~8/8719I
818~62804 88/~7/91 88/87/91
819778~734 88/87/91 08/87/91
8184818694 88/87/9! 881~7171
8184818894 98/87/91 88/87/91
8118583844 08/14/91 88/14/91
0111788814 88/14/9i 88/14/91
~111789~24 88/14/91 88/14/91
~!11788834 08/14/9! 08/14/91
8!I!798~A 88/14/9! 88/14/91
~111782584 98/14/91 88/14/91
0115881014 88/21/91 88/2~/9!
8115015088 08/21/11 08/21/91
0187608~94 88/87/91 88/87/91
0124888154 07/17/91 87/17/91
8124888158 88/21/91 88/21/91
8131581118 88/21/91 88/21/91
8131178858 88/21/91 88/21/91
8124~25888 88/21/91 08/21/91
8116836418 88/2i/91 88/21/91
81160~1318 88/21/91 ~B/21/91
811528824 07/IB/91 97/19/91
8115838188 ~8/21/91 88/21/91
812409815 ~7/81/?I 87/91/91
8113282088 88/14/91 88/14/91
0124988828 88/21/91 88/21/91
812489924 87/17/9! 87/17/91
~1248882 07/01191 87/81/91
012~8~&088 88121191 ~8/21/91
0124886884 87/17/91 ~7/17/91
812480688 ~7101/91 87i81/91
0!24807~28 88/21/~1 88/21/91
8!240~7524 g7/17/91 87/17/91
81248~7~2 07/81/91 87/81/91
8187688788 88/07/91 ~8/97/91
Check IotaIs:
81-0~-272~B'-516119-7117
~1-88-27998-21~119-7117
81-84-63~85-2/6/17~7/15
01-e4-62808-2/6/17-7/15
81-97-79~73-2/6/19-7/17
81-84-~1~69-2/~/17-7/15
81-84-81988-2/6/17-7/15
~1-19-58384-216124~7122
81-!1-78881-2/&/25-7/25
81-11-79~92-2/&/25-7/23
81-11-7~85-2/6/25-7/23
81-11-78809-2/6/25~7/23
81-11-78258-2/6/25-7/25
81-15-~8181-2/&/25~7/23
81-15-~1588-2/6/25-7/25
81-87-69~89-216/19~7/17
81-24-~8815-2/5/31~6/27
81-24-89815-2/6/27-7/25
81-31-5~111-1/~/15-7/29
81-31-178~5-2/7/1-7/29
81-24-82588-1/7/2-7/25
91-i&-B384S-1/&/25-7123
81-!6-83331-I/6/25-7/25
B1-13-2928~-2/5/28-6/24
81-15-83~18-1/7/11-7/23
81-24-88815-2/5/14-5/31
~1-13-28298-2/6/24-7/22
81-24-B~882-2/6/27-7/25
01-24-98992-215131-al27
01-24-00002-2i5114-5131
81-24-98688-2/6/57-7/25
01-24-88688-2/5/3>6/27
81-24-88690-2/5/!5-5/51
~1-24-08752-2/6/27-7/25
81-24-89752-2/5/3!-~/27
01-24-~9752-2/5/15-5/3[
58.45 8.88 58.45
59.46 8.88 50.46
37~.32 0.00 376.52
105.37 8.88 185.37
95.49 8.~e 95.49
16.28 ~.88 1~.28
22.18 0.88 22.18
79.43 8.88 79.43
155.8S ~.88 155.85
382.52 ~.88 3~2.52
531.?B 8.00 531.90
135.40 0.88 !53.40
967.99 8.98 967.89
135.92 8.B8 155.72
228.85 8.88 228.85
476,95 8,B8 476.93
428.52 8.88 428.32
116.52 8.8~ 116.32
56!.31 8.98 561.51
2~5.82 8.89 2~5.82
13.67 8.98 13.~7
485.14 8.88 48S.1~
2,858.12 0.89 2,858,12
49.28 8.88 49,2e
88,95 8.88 88,95
3,868.59 8.88 5~66G.59
388.86 8.88 388.86
485.58 ~,88 485.58
185,15 8.88 185.!5
239.84 8.88 239.64
158.59 0,80 156.59
74.73 B.BB 74.75
151.2~ e.oe 151.28
160.71 e.88 168.91
75.28 8.88 75.28
648.85 B.~e 548.85
=~sc~ ~e~.: I;~2 Criec~ ReGister S~auon: 3!45c
Chec~ Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
912488898 87/81/91 87/81191 91~24-88898-215115-5/31 668.66 9.88 aa8.a4
e124888~88 88/2!/9! ~812119t ~!-2A-~8898-216127-7125 295.19 8.8~ 295.19
Check Totals: 15,651.72
88887925 e?/161~I SECURITY SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BAN
~781A 87191191 87/81/91 4798-9288-8881-8781/JUNE CHB 35.88
B.88 15,a51.72
Check Totals: 35.88
09/24/91 ALLCITY ALL CITY MANAGEMENT
1871 99/89/91 8247 87/81/91 TRAFFIC CONTROL/B/25-9/7 5,687.96
Check Totals:
88887927 09124191C&CGRAVE C & C 8RADIN8 AND PAVING
11 89/85/91 t254 89/85/91 RETENTION
12 89/85/91 8254 89/81/91 RETENTION
18 99/85/91 8254 89/85/91 STREET MAINT/B/12,B/14
18-1 88t19/91 1221 87/81/91 STREET MAINTI8112,8114
3,687.96
3,687.98
585.48 8.88 585.48
25.57 8.88 23.57
2,496.17 8.88 2,496.19
4,111.44 8.88 4,111.44
Check Totals:
88087928 89/24/91DEPHEALT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
873191 87/31/91 8199 87/81/91 ANIMAL CONTROL/JULY 1991
7,216.68
7,881.12
7,218.68
7,881.12
~8~87929 e9/24191RAMTEK RAMTEK
3752 99/85/91 8255
3783 89185191 8255
~" 5763-I 89/85191 8255
Check Totals:
19/85/~1 STREET MAINl/JULY 23,AUG. 18
~9/85/91 ST. MAINT/8/29-8/38
89/85/91 DRAINAGE/8/2%8/38
7,881.12
1,557.BB
559.71
3,758.14
7,881.12
1,557.88
559.71
3,738.14
98087930 89/24191 SHERIFF
Check Totals:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
97181/9! e7/81/91 JUNE 1991/LAW ENFORCEMENT
~T/31/~! 87/31/91 JULY 1991/LAW ENFORCEMENT
5,8~7.75
27~,648.4!
5J47.73
8.88 27~,640.41
0.00 28~.884.61
Check Totals:
535,445.82
555,445.82
Report Totals:
592,224.17
572,224.17
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL
LUCI ROMERO
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN
DOCUMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No 91-
Document.
__, Amending The City of Temecula Flexible Benefit Plan
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1990, the City Council authorized the establishment of the City of
Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan. The Plan is a mechanism for providing health
benefits to employees. The Plan allows employees to obtain medical, dental and
vision care in accordance with their needs. Additionally, the Plan allows for medical
and dependant care reimbursement from the employee's flexible plan allotment.
The purpose of the revisions to the Plan Document are two-fold: 1) to amend the
Benefit Plan Year period, and 2) to have the document reflect action which the City
Council has previously authorized. The Plan Year ending date is being amended to
July 31, 1991 to be consistent with the Plan Year for the California Public Employees'
Retirement System Health Plan (PERS Health). The City's subsequent Plan Year will
be for the period of August I through July 31.
The remaining 'housekeeping' revision reflects the increase in the Benefit Allotment
to $490 which was approved by the City Council on May 25, 1991. Additionally, the
health care premiums schedule has been revised to reflect rate increases.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact, sufficient funds are included in the current budget.
RESOLUTION NO 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN
DOCUMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan
Document on September 18, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Council may, by Resolution, establish the monthly flexible
benefit allotment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula is a member of the California Public
Retirement System Health Plan (PERS Health).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula as follows:
SECTION 1. The City's first Flexible Benefit Plan Year ended on July 31, 1991.
SECTION 2. Subsequent Plan Years shall be for the period of August 1 through
July 31.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September, 1991.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
CITY OF TEMECULA
FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
OCTOBER 19 9 0
CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I
ARTICLE II
ARTICLE III
ARTICLE IV
ARTICLE V
ARTICLE VI
ARTICLE VII
ARTICLE VIII
SCHEDULE A-I'
SCHEDULE A-2
ART. I
ART. II
ART. III
ART. IV
ART. V
SCHEDULE A-3
ART. I
ART. II
ART.
ART. IV
ART. V
FOREWORD AND PURPOSE 1
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION 1
ELIGIBILITY, PARTICIPATION AND ENROLLMENT 3
CONTRIBUTIONS 6
ADMINISTRATION 7
AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN 9
TERMINATION OF THE PLAN 9
MISCELLANEOUS 10
PREMIUMS Ai-1
DEPENDENT CARE COMPONENT A2-1
FORWARD AND PURPOSE A2-1
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION A2-1
DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE A2-2
DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE ACCOUNTS A2-3
PAYMENT OF DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE A2-4
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT COMPONENT A3-1
FORWARD AND PURPOSE A3-1
DEFINITIONS A3-1
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS A3-1
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNTS A3-2
PAYMENT OF MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS A3-3
CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
ARTICLE I FOREWORD AND PURPOSE
The City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan permits Participants
to elect to receive cash or coverage for themselves and their
eligible Dependents under various Component Plans.
The Plan has been established by the
exclusive benefit of its Employees
under Section 125 of the Internal
"cafeteria plan".
City of
and is
Revenue
Temecula for the
intended to qualify
Code of 1986, as a
ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
2.1 Definitions: Where the following words and phrases appear
in this Plan they shall have the meaning set forth below, unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
(a) Code: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and regulations
and rulings issued thereunder, as amended from time to time.
(b) Component Plan: Any one of the plans listed in subsection
(c) below. It is intended that each of the Component Plans shall
constitute a "qualified benefit" within the meaning of Section 125
of the Code.
(c) Coverage Expenses: The insurance premiums or other costs for
the benefit coverage a Participant elects pursuant to Section 3.3,
and which is provided under one or more of the Component Plans
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:
SEE SCHEDULE "A-l; A-2, A-3"
(d) Covered Compensation: For each Plan Year, a Participant's
Covered Compensation shall mean the actual compensation (including
bonuses and overtime) accrued or paid by the Employer to the
Employee for the period during which the Employee was a
Participant in this Plan.
(e) Dependent: A spouse or child of the participant as defined
in the various benefit plans listed on schedule "A-i".
(f) Discrimination: This Plan shall not be operated in such a
manner as to discriminate in favor of highly compensated
individuals pursuant to Code Sections 89 & 105.
(g) Effective Date:
is October 1, 1990.
The date upon which this Plan is effective
(h) Employee: Any person who is an employee (the term
"employee" having its customary, common law meaning) of the
Employer and who is receiving remuneration for personal services
rendered to the Employer and is eligible for coverage in the
various benefit plans offered by the Employer.
(i) Employer: The City of Temecula.
(j) Employer Contribution: The Employer Contribution for each
Plan Year shall be the sum of (1) and (2) below:
(1) Non-elective contributions: The amount the Employer makes
available for the benefit of each Participant for the Plan Year
pursuant to Section 4.1.
(2) Elective Contributions: The amount of Flexible Pay
applied to a Participant's Coverage Expenses under the Plan. It
is intended hereunder that such amounts shall, for tax putposed
(including Section 125 of the Code), constitute an Employer
Contribution. For each Plan Year, the maximum amount of Employer
Contribution available under the Plan to any Participant for
application to his or her Coverage Expenses shall be that amount
set forth in Schedule A of the Plan. For purposes of Section 125
of the Code, the amount set forth in Schedule A shall constitute
the maximum Employer Contribution available to any Participant
under the Plan during a Plan Year. The maximum amount shall be
determined by the Employer prior to the beginning of the Regular
Enrollment Period for the ensuing Plan Year and shall be adjusted
as necessary due to increases in cost of the coverage.
(k) ERISA: Public Law 93-406, the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 and regulations and rulings issued thereunder
as amended from time to time.
(1) Fiduciaries: The Named Fiduciaries who shall be the
Employer and the Plan Administrator, and other parties designated
as Fiduciaries by such Named Fiduciaries in accordance with the
powers herein provided, but only with respect to the specific
responsibilities of each in connection with the Plan.
(m) Flexible Pay: The amount of Covered Compensation that,
pursuant to Section 4.2, is applied on behalf of a Participant to
pay his or her Coverage Expenses or that (to the extent not
otherwise applied). he or she may elect to receive as additional
cash compensation.
- 2 -
(n) Highly Compensated Participant: See Key Employee below.
(o) Key Employee: A Participant who is (1) an officer of the
Employer having at least $45,000 annual compensation from the
Employer or such other amount as is prescribed by the Secretary of
the Treasury from time to time, pursuant to Code Section 415
(d)(1)(B); provided however, that no more than 50 employees, or if
the number of employees of the Employer is less than 500, the
greater of three of 10% of the employees, shall be treated as
officers; (2) one of the 10 employees, having at least $30,000
annual compensation from the Employer (or such other amount as is
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury ~rom time to time
pursuant to Code Section 415 (d)(1)(B).
(p) Participant: Any
terms of the Plan for
qualified.
Employee who
participation
has qualified under the
herein and who remains so
(q) Plan: The City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan set forth
herein, as amended form time to time.
(r) Plan Administrator:
successors, which shall have
provided in Article V.
The Employer
authority to
or its successor or
administer the Plan as
(s) Plan Year: The first Plan Year shall be the period commencing
October 1, 1990 and ending July 31, 1991. Effective August 1, 1991
all subsequent Plan Years shall be the 12-month period commencing
on August 1 and ending on July 31.
2.2 Construction: As used in this Plan, the masculine gender
includes the feminine, and the singular includes the plural,
unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary. The words
"hereof", "hereunder" and other similar compounds of the word
"here" mean and refer to the entire Plan, not to any particular
provision or section.
ARTICLE III ELIGIBILITY, PARTICIPATION AND ENROLLMENT
3.1 Eligibility and Participation:
(a) Commencement of Participation: An eligible Employee, as
defined in Section 2.1, may commence (or recommence) participation
in this Plan on the latest of the following dates: (1) the
Effective Date of the Plan, (2) the first day of the month
following the Employee's date of employment or reemployemnt [may
not exceed 37 months] as an Employee; or (3) the date (as
determined by the Plan Administrator) that the Election Form is
filed by the Participant.
- 3 -
Not withstanding the preceding sentence, an Employee who is
disabled and not actively employed on the date his or her
participation would otherwise have commenced shall not become a
Participant in the Plan until the date he or she returns to active
employment. as an Employee. A Participant's right to participant
in any Component Plan shall be dependent upon the Participant's
satisfying the specific terms and conditions of participation
which are applicable to such Component Plan.
(b) Termination of Participation: A Participant shall continue
to participate in this Plan until the earlier of the following
dates: (1) The day Participant ceases to qualify as a participant
resulting from termination of employment or failure to make
required contributions, if any; (2) the day Participant terminates
membership in a group or class of employees eligible for Plan or
Program benefits; (3) with respect to a covered dependent, the
date such person ceases to be a dependent; or (4) the date the
Plan is terminated.
3.2 Enrollment: An eligible Employee as defined in section 2.1
may enroll (or re-enroll) in the Plan by submitting to the Plan
Administrator, during an enrollment period described in subsection
(a) below, an Election Form which specifies his or her elections
for the Plan Year as to Dependent status and benefit coverage
under the Component Plans for which he or she is eligible, which
sets forth his or her agreement to use the necessary amount of
Flexible Pay to pay his or her Coverage Expenses (if any), and
which meets such other standards for completeness and accuracy as
the Plan Administrator may establish. Such Employee shall specify
his election as to Dependent status as coming within one of the
following categories; (i) Employee without Dependents, or (ii)
Employee with one Dependent, or (iii) Employee with two or more
Dependents. A Participant's Election Form shall not be effective
prior to the date such form is submitted to the Plan
Administrator. Any Election Form. submitted by a Participant in
accordance with this Section. shall remain in effect until the
earlier of the following dates: the date the Participant
terminates participation in the Plan or the effective date (as
determined by the Plan Administrator) of a subsequently filed
Election Form submitted pursuant to subsections (a) (2) and (3)
below.
(a) Enrollment Periods:
(1) Each Employee who is eligible, as defined in Article 2.1 on
October 1, 1990 shall have an Initial Enrollment Period which
shall begin on September 20, 1990 and shall terminate on October
15, 1990. Each Employee who becomes eligible on or after October
1, 1990 shall have an Initial Enrollment Period which shall begin
on the first day of his or her eligibility to participate as a
eligible employee and shall terminate 45 days thereafter.
~ 4 -
(2) Each participant shall have a Regular Enrollment Period
during which to make elections for the immediately ensuing Plan
Year. For Plan Years beginning August 1, 1991 and thereafter, the
Regular Enrollment Period for such Plan Year shall commence on
June 15 prior to such Plan Year, and shall terminate 45 days
thereafter July 31.
(3) A participant who incurs a change in Dependent status shall
have a Special Enrollment Period which shall begin on the date of
his or her Dependent status changes and shall terminate 45 days
thereafter.
For purposes of this paragraph,
shall change when his or her
identity, or employment.
a Participant's Dependent status
Dependents change in number,
(b) Enrolling Dependents: An eligible Employee may enroll in
the Plan any or all of his or her Dependents during his or her
Initial Enrollment Period, Regular Enrollment Period, or Special
Enrollment Period. A Participant who incurs a Dependent status
change may enroll any new Dependents during the Special Enrollment
Period commencing on the date such individuals become Dependents
of the Participant. Any Dependent not enrolled during an
Enrollment Period described in the two preceding sentences may be
enrolled thereafter for the current Plan Year only with the
consent of the Plan Administrator. An Employee shall enroll his or
her Dependents by specifying, on such forms as the Plan
Administrator may require, the Dependents' names and birth dates,
and by electing the category of dependent coverage that
corresponds to the number of Dependents the Employee wishes to
enroll.
(c) Limitations on Enrollment Elections: A Participant's right
to elect certain benefit coverage shall be limited hereunder to
the extent such rights are limited in a Component Plan or in rules
adopted by the Plan Administrator. Furthermore, a Participant
shall not be entitled to revoke an Enrollment Election after a
period of coverage has commenced and to make a new Enrollment
Eleation with respect to the remainder of the period of coverage
unless both the revocation and the new election are on account of
and consistent with a change in family status (e.g., marriage,
divorce, death of a spouse or child, birth or adoption of child,
and termination of employment of spouse).
(d) Notice of Eligibility: The Plan Administrator shall notify
employees of their eligibility to participate in the Plan and of
the terms of the Plan. Each Participant shall be furnished with a
copy of this Plan Description.
- 5 -
ARTICLE IV CONTRIBUTIONS
4.1 Nonelective Contributions: For each Plan Year, the Employer
in its sole discretion, may make on behalf of each Participant a
Nonelective Contribution to provide benefits for such Participant
and his or. her Dependents, if applicable, under the Plan. The
amount of a Nonelective Contribution shall be calculated for each
Plan Year in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner based on the
Participant's Dependent status category (as elected under Section
3.2), the commencement or termination date of 'the Participant's
employment during the Plan Year, and such other factors as the
Employer shall prescribe. If the amount of the Nonelective
Contribution exceeds the cost of the benefit coverage selected by
the Participant, no such excess amounts will be currently paid to
the Participant, but shall be credited as deferred compensation.
4.2 ELECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS:
(a) FLEXIBLE PAY CONTRIBUTIONS: Each Participant shall
authorize the Plan Administrator to withhold from his or her
Covered Compensation for the Plan Year an amount of Flexible Pay
equal to his or her Coverage Expenses in excess of his or her
Nonelective Contribution for such year. Any Flexible Pay which is
withheld form a Participant's Covered Compensation pursuant to
this Section shall be withheld in approximately equal installments
from the amounts payable to the Participant for each pay period
during the Plan Year ( or such portion of the year as the Plan
Administrator may designate). For Employees whose salary during
the year is paid to them over a period of time less than a year,
Flexible Pay amounts will be withheld in installments as
determined by the Plan Administrator. If an Employee becomes a
Participant after the beginning of the first pay period of the
Plan Year, the amount withheld from his or her Covered
Compensation during such year- shall be a pro rata share of the
amount that would have been withheld had he or she been a
Participant in-the Plan. as of the beginning of the Plan Year.
(b) ELECTION: An. election under subsection (a) to authorize
withhoIding of Flexible Pay shall be made on an Election form
submitted in accordance with Section 3.2. an election to have
withheld an amount of Flexible pay which, in the determination of
the Plan Administrator, exceeds the limitation on Flexible Pay set
forth in subsection (a) may in the discretion of the Plan
Administrator be treated as void or an election to have withheld
the maximum amount permissible under such limitation.
4.3 EFFECT OF CHANGE IN DEPENDENT STATUS: If a Participant's
elections change during the Plan Year because of an election made
during a Special Enrollment Period, then in accordance with rules
adopted by the Plan Administrator appropriate adjustments shall
be made in the am6unt withheld from or added to the Participant's
pay for the balance of. the year to reflect any changes in the
Participant's Elective Contributions and benefit elections.
- 6 -
ARTICLE V ADMINISTRATION
5.1 ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY AMONG FIDUCIARIES FOR PLAN
ADMINISTRATION:
The Fiduciaries shall have only those powers, duties,
responsibflities, and obligations as are specifically given or
delegated to them under this Plan.
(a) The Employer shall have the sole responsibility for making
the Employer Contributions under the Plan as specified in Article
IV.
(b) The Employer shall have the sole authority to appoint and
remove the Plan Administrator, and to amend or terminate this Plan
in whole or in part.
(c) The Plan Administrator shall
for the administration of the
specifically described herein.
have the sole responsibility
Plan, which responsibility is
(d) Each Fiduciary warrants that any directions given,
information. furnished, or action taken by it shall be in
accordance with the provisions of the Plan authorizing or
providing for such direction, information or action of another
Fiduciary as being proper under the Plan, and is not required
under the Plan to inquire into the propriety of any direction,
information or action.
5.2 ADMINISTRATOR: The Plan shall be administered by the Plan
Administrator which may appoint or employ persons to assist in the
administration of the Plan and may appoint or employ any other
agents it deems advisable, including legal counsel, actuaries,
auditors, bookkeepers and recordkeepers to serve at the Plan
Administrator's direction. All usual and reasonable expenses of
the Plan and the Plan Administrator may be paid by the Employer or
this Plan.
5.3 CLAIMS PROCEDURE: The Plan Administrator, or a party
designated by the Plan Administrator, shall make all
determinations as to the right of a person to an Employer
Contribution under the Plan. If an assertion of any such right by
a Participant or Dependent is wholly or partially denied, the Plan
Administrator, or the designated party, will provide such claimant
a comprehensible written notice within 90 days after receipt of
the claim, unless circumstances warrant an extension of time not
to exceed an additional 90 days, setting forth:
(a) The specific reason or reasons for such denial;
(b) Specific reference to pertinent Plan provisions on which the
denial is based;
(c) A description of any additional material or information
necessary .for the claimant to submit pertinent to the claim and an
explanation of why such material or information is necessary;
(d) A description of the Plan's claim review procedure. The
review procedure is available upon written request by the claimant
to the Plan Administrator, or the designated party, within 60 days
after receipt by the claimant of written notice of denial of the
claim, and includes the right to examine pertinent documents and
submit issues and comments in writing to the Plan Administrator,
or the designated party.
The decision on review shall be made within 60 days after receipt
of request for review, unless circumstances warrant an extension
of time not to exceed an additional 60 days. The decision shall be
in writing and drafted in a manner calculated to be understood by
the claimant, and shall include specific reasons for the decision
with references to' the specific Plan provisions on which the
decision is based.
5.4 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS AND DUTIES: The Plan
administrator shall have such powers and duties as may be
necessary to discharge its functions hereunder, including:
(a) to construe and interpret the Plan, decide all questions of
eligibility and determine the amount, manner and time of payment
of any reimbursements hereunder;
(b) to prescribe procedures to be followed by Participants
electing benefit coverages or filing applications for
reimbursements;
(c) to prepare and distribute, in such manner as the Plan
Administrator determines to be appropriate, information explaining
the Plan;
(d) to receive from Employees, agents and Participants such
information as shall be necessary for the proper administration of
the Plan;
(e) to receive, review and keep on file (as it deems convenient
or proper) reports of the receipts and disbursements of the Plan;
(f) to appoint or employ individuals or other parties to assist
in the administration of the Plan and any other agents it deems
advisable, including accountants, legal counsel, bookkeepers and
recordkeepers, and
(g) to designate or employ persons to
Administrator's fiduciary duties or
~lan,
carry out any of the Plan
responsibilities under the
5.5 RULES AND DECISIONS: The Plan Administrator may adopt such
rules and procedures as it deems necessary, desirable, or
appropriate for the administration of this Plan. All rules,
procedures and decisions of the Plan Administrator shall be
uniformly 'and consistently applied to all Participants in similar
circumstances. When making a determination or calculation, the
Plan Administrator shall be entitled to rely upon information
furnished by a Participant, a Dependent, the duly authorized
representative of a-Participant or Dependent or the legal counsel
of the Plan Administrator.
5.6 FORMS AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION: The Plan Administrator
may require a participant to complete and file such forms as are
provided for herein and all other forms prescribed by the Plan
Administrator, and to furnish all pertinent information requested
by the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator may rely upon
all such information, including the Participant's current mailing
address.
5.7 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLAN: The complete authority to control
and manage the operation and administration of the Plan shall be
placed in the Plan Administrator, who shall be solely responsible
for the operation of the Plan in accordance with its terms.
ARTICLE VI AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
The Employer shall have the right at any time by instrument in
· writing, duly executed and acknowledged, to modify, alter or amend
this Plan in whole or in part, provided however, that no such
amendment shall diminish or eliminate any claim for any benefit to
which a Participant shall have become entitled prior to such
amendment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Employer shall have
the limited right 'to amend the Plan at any time, retroactively or
otherwise, in such respects and to such extent as may be necessary
to fully qualify it .as a. "cafeteria plan" under existing and
applicable laws and regulations, including Section 125 of the
Code, and if and to the extent necessary to accomplish such
purpose, may by such amendment decrease or otherwise affect
benefits to which Participants may have already become entitled.
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
The Plan herein provided for has been established by the Employer
with the bona fide intention that it shall be continued in
operation indefinitely. However, the Employer reserves the right
at any time to terminate or partially terminate the Plan. Should
the Employer decide to terminate or partially terminate the Plan,
the Plan Administrator shall be notified of such termination in
writing and shall proceed at the direction of the Employer to
take such steps as are necessary to discontinue the operation of
the Plan in an appropriate and timely manner.
- 9 -
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS
8.1 EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS: Under no circumstances shall the terms
of employment of any Participant be modified or in any way
affected hereby. This Plan shall not constitute a contract of
employment nor afford any individual any right except as contained
herein nor to be retained in the employ of the Employer.
8.2 NONASSIGNABILITY: To the extent permitted by law,
Participants are prohibited from anticipating, encumbering,
alienating or assigning any of their rights, claims or interests
in this Plan, and no undertaking or attempt to do so shall in any
way bind the Plan Administrator or be o~ any force or affect
whatsoever. Furthermore, to the extent permitted by law, no such
rights, claims or interest of a Participant in this Plan shall in
any way be subject to such Participant's debts, contracts or
engagements, nor to attachment, garnishment, levy or other legal
or equitable process. Provided however, anything to the contrary
herein notwithstanding, to the extent permissible under applicable
law, a Participant's interest hereunder is subject to all bona
fide and existing debts owed by such Participant to the Plan.
8.3 NO GUARANTEE ON NON-TAXABILITY: The Plan is designed and
is intended to be operated as a "cafeteria plan" under Section 125
of the Code. Nonetheless, neither the Employer nor any Plan
Fiduciary shall in any way be liable for any taxes or other
liability incurred by a Participant or anyone claiming through him
or her by virtue o~ Participation in this Plan. The Plan does not
prohibit, and indeed contemplates, the payment of taxable benefits
under certain of the Component Plans.
8.4 NONDISCRIMINATION: In accordance with Section 89, 105, &
125 (b) (1) and (2) of the Code, the Plan is intended not to
discriminate in favor of 'Highly Compensated Individuals as to
eligibility to participate or as to contributions and benefits,
nor to provide more than 25% of all qualified benefits to Key
Employees. If, in the operation of the Plan, more than 25% o~ the
total qualified benefits are found to be provided to Key
Employees, or the Plan discriminates in any other manner (or is in
danger of so discriminating)., then notwithstanding any other
provision contained herein, the Plan Administrator shall reduce or
adjust such contributions and/or benefits under the Plan as shall
be necessary to assure that, in the Judgement of the Plan
Administrator, the Plan thereafter will not discriminate. All
rules, procedures and decisions of the Plan administrator shall be
adopted, made and/or applied in such fashion that they do not
discriminate in favor of Highly Compensated Participants and Key
Employees.
8.5 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY BY EMPLOYER: Whenever the Employer
under the terms of this Agreement is permitted or required to do
or perform any act or matter or thing, it shall be done and
performed by any officer or individual duly authorized by the
Employer.
8.6 CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT: This Plan shall be construed
according to the laws of the State of California and all
provisions hereof shall be administered according to and its
validity and enforceability shall be determined under the laws of
such state, except where preempted by the Code or ERISA
8.7 HEADINGS: The headings of sections and subsections are for
ease of reference only any shall not be construed to limit or
modify the detailed provisions hereof.
8.8 ENTIRE PEAN STATED: This document sets forth the entire
plan. No other employee benefit or employee benefit plan which is
or may hereafter be maintained by the Employer on a nonelective
basis shall constitute a part of this plan.
- 11 -
CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
SCHEDULE A
MONTHLY CITY CON~IBU~ION FOR EACH ELIGIBLE F~LOYEE
EFFECTIVE THE FIRST OF THE MOI~ POLLOWING ONE FULL MONTH
OF ELIGIBLE EMPLOYI~ IS:
$49o WITH PHEMCA MEDICAL PLAN PARTICIPATION
$474 WITHOUT PHEMCA MEDICAL PL~_N PARTICIPATION
SCHEDULE A-1
LIFE INSURANCE:
BANKERS SECURITY GROUP TERM- .15/$1,000 OF COVERAGE
" ..... ' AI)&D- .05 ..... ' "
($50,000 OF COVERAGE = $10.OO/MO. PER EMPLOYEE)
LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE:
UNUM 1.O5% OF COVERED SALARY TO A MAXIMUM COVERED SALARY
OF $9,OO9/MO.
8/9
SCHEDULE A-1 CONTINUED
H~THP~S:
MONTHLY RATES - 1 PARTY 2 PARTY FAMILY
HEALTH NET 157.00 292.00 397.42
LINCOLN NATIONAL 138.77 284.48 388.56
MAXICARE 159.38 297.31 393.40
PARTNERS 156.80 316.74 454.72
ROSS LOOS/CIGNA 151.95 297.26 399.03
PERS -CARE ( INDEMNITY )
DENTAL PLAN:
DENTICARE
223.00 422.00 563.00
$16/MO.
VISION PLAN:
AVP
$9.20/MO. EMPLOYEE ONLY
$15.75/MO. EMPLOYEE AND DEPENDENTS
8/91
SCHEDULE A-1 CONTINUED
COLONIAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY PLANS
N6CP
NSCP
E12B
PA00
PA01
PA02
XXXX
XXXX
Accident & Disability
Sickness & Disability
Cancer
Employee/Dependent Life
Long. Term Care
$16.25/mo.
18.75/mo.
23.50/mo.
29. O0/mo.
19.50/mo.
25.50/mo.
31.2S/mo.
Individual Rate
IS It
(Additional coverages may be offered at the sole discretion
of the City)
SCHEDULE A-2
DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE COMPONENT PLAN
ARTICLE I. FORWARD ANO PURPOSE
This Dependent Care Assistance Component Plan is established for
the exclusive benefit of employees and is intended to qualify as
a dependent care assistance program under Sections 125 and 129 of
the Code. The purpose of the Plan is to enable employee
Participants to elect to receive palnnents or reimbursements of
their dependent care expenses in lieu of their compensation,
which payments are incurred by Participants in connection with
their employment and are excludable from the Participant's gross
income under Sections 125 and 129 of the Code.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
2.1 Definitions. Where the following words and phrases appear in
this Plan, they shall have the following meanings, -unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
(a) Dependent: (1) General Rule: Any individual who is (i) a
dependent of the Participant who is under the age of 13 and with
respect to whom the Participant is entitled to an exemption under
Section 151(c) of the Code, or (ii) a dependent or spouse of the
Participant who is physically or mentally incapable of caring for
himself. (2) Special Rule for Divorce or Separation of Parents:
Notwithstanding subsection (1), if (i) either Code Section
152(e)(2) (regarding the release by a custodial parent of a claim
to a dependency exemption) or Code Section 152(e)(4) (regarding
various pre-1985 divorce or separation agreements) is applicable
to a child of an Employee, and (ii) such child is under the age
of 13 or is physically or mentally incapable of self-care, then
such child shall be deemed a dependent with respect to the
Employee if such Employee is the custodial parent (within the
meaning of Code Section 152(e)(1) ) of the child. (3) Other
relatives by blood or marriage that are incapable of caring for
themselves meeting the requirements of both Sections 151 & 152 of
the Code.
(b) Dependent Care Assistance Account:
in Article IV hereof.
The account described
A2-1
(c) Dependent Care Expenses: Expenses incurred by a
Participant which (1) are paid or incurred for the care of a
Dependent' of the Participant or for related household services,
(2) are paid or incurred to a Dependent Care Service Provider,
and (3) are incurred to enable the Participant to be gainfully
employed for any period for which there are one or more
Dependents with respect to the Participant. Dependent Care
Expenses shall not include expenses paid or incurred for services
rendered outside the Participant's household for the care of
Dependent unless such Dependent is described in Section
2.1(a)(1), or such Dependent regularly spends at least eight
hours a day in the Participant's household. Dependent care
Expenses shall be deemed to be incurred at the time the services
to which the expenses relate are rendered.
(d) Dependent Care Service Prowider: A person who provides
care or their services described in Section 2.1(c)(1) above, but
shall not include (1) a dependent care center (as defined in Code
Section 21(b)(2)(D) ), unless the requirements of Code Section
21(b)(2)(C). are satisfied, or (2) a related individual described
in Code Section 129 (c).
(e) Earned Income: All income derived from wages, salaries,
tips, self employment, and other employee compensation described
in Code Section 32(c)(2) but excluding amounts received under
this Plan or under any other plan providing dependent care
assistance.
ARTICLE III. DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE
3.1 Maximum dependent care assistance. The :maximum amount
which the Participant may receive 'in any Plan Year in the form of
dependent care assistance under this Plan shall be the least of
(a) the Participant's Earned Income for the Plan Year, (b) the
actual or deemed Earned Income of the spouse for the Plan year,
or (c) $ 5,000. Provided however, that for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1986, the maximum amount that the
Participant may receive in any taxable year shall not exceed
$5,000. The $5,000 limit shall be reduced to 82,508 in the case
of a separate return by a married individual. In the case of a
spouse who is a Student or is physically or mentally incapable
of caring for himself or herself, such spouse shall be deemed to
have Earned Income of not less than $200 per month if the
Participant has one Dependent and $400 per month if the
Participant has two or more Dependents.
A2- 2
3.2 Treatment of Onsite Facilities. Except to the extent
provided in regulations, effective for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1986, the amount of dependent care assistance
any Participant may receive under this Plan with respect to an
onsite facility maintained by the Employer shall be based on
utilization of the facility by the Dependent and the value of
services provided.
ARTICLE IV. DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE ACCOUNTS
4.1 Establishment of accounts. The Employer will establish
and maintain on its books a Dependent Care Assistance Account for
each Plan Year with respect to each Participant who has elected
under the Flexible Benefits Plan to receive dependent care
assistance for the Plan Year.
4.2 Crediting of accounts. There shall be credited to a
Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for each Plan
Year, as of each date compensation is paid to the Participant in
such Plan. Year, an amount equal to the reduction for dependent
care assistance, if any, to be made in such compensation in
accordance with the Participant's election under the Flexible
Benefits Plan. All amounts credited to each such Dependent Care
Assistance Account shall be the property of the Employer until
paid out pursuant to Article V.
4.3 Debiting of accounts. A Participant's Dependent Care
Assistance Account for each Plan Year shall be debited from time
to time in 'the amount of any payment under Article V to or for
the benefit of the Participant for Dependent Care Expenses
incurred during such Plan Year. Amounts debited to each such
Dependent Care Assistance Account shall be treated as payments
of those amounts first credited to the Account that have not yet
been treated as paid under this Section.
4.4 Forfeiture of. accounts. The. amount credited to a
Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for any Plan Year
shall be used-only to reimburse the Participant for Dependent
Care Expenses incurred during4 such Plan Year, and only if the
Participant applies for reimbursement on or before the 30th day
following the close of the Plan Year. If any balance remains in
the Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for any Plan
Year after all reimbursements hereunder, such balance shall not
be carried over to reimburse the Participant for Dependent Care
Expenses incurred during a subsequent Plan Year, and shall not
be available to the Participant in any other form or manner, but
shall remain the property of the Employer and the Participant
shall forfeit all rights with respect to such balance.
A2- 3
ARTICLE V. PAYMENT OF DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE
5.1 Claims for reimbursement. A Participant who has elected
to receive dependent care assistance for a Plan Year may apply to
the Employer for reimbursement of Dependent Care Expenses
incurred by the Participant during the Plan Year by submitting an
application in writing to the Plan Administrator as the Plan
Administrator, setting forth; (a) the amount, date and nature of
the expenses with respect to which a benefit is requested; (b)
the name of the person, organization or entity to which the
expense was or is to be paid; and (c) such other application
shall be accompanied by bills, invoices, receipts, cancelled
checks or other statements showing the amounts of such expenses,
together with any additional documentation which the Plan
Administrator may request.
5.2 Reimbursement or payment of expenses. The Plan
Administrator reimburse the Participant's Dependent Care Expenses
incurred during the Plan Year for which the Participant submits
documentatfon in accordance with Section 5.1. The Plan
Administrator may, at its option, pay any such Dependent Care
Expenses directly to the Dependent Care Service Provider in lieu
of reimbursing the Participant. No reimbursement or payment
under this Section 5.2 of expenses incurred during a Plan Year
shall at any time exceed the balance of the Participant's
Dependent Care Assistance Account for the Plan Year at the time
of the reimbursement or payment. The amount of any Dependent
Care Expenses not reimbursed or paid as a result of the preceding
sentence shall be carried over and reimbursed or paid only if and
when the balance in'such Account permits such reimbursement or
payment; provided however, that no Dependent Care Expenses may be
carried over from one Plan Year to the next.
5.3 Report to Participants. On or before January 31 of each
year, the Plan Administrator shall furnish to each Participant
who has received dependent care assistance during the prior
calendar year a written statement showing the amount of such
assistance paid or incurred by the Employer during such calendar
year with respect to the Participant.
A2- 4
SCHEDULE A-3
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT COMPONENT PLAN
ARTICLE I. FOREWORD AND PURPOSE
This Medical Reimbursement Component Plan is established for the
exclusive benefit of employees and is intended to qualify under
Sections 125 and 105(b) of the Code, and is to be interpreted in
a manner consistant with the requirements of the Code. The
purpose of this Component of the Plan is to enable employee
Participants to elect to receive payments or reimbursements of
Qualifying Medical Care Expenses in lieu of compensation, which
payments are excludable from the Participant's gross income under
Sections 125 and 105(b) of the Code.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Definitions. Where the following words and phrases appear
in this plan, they shall have the following meanings, unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
(a) Medical Reimbursement Account:
Article IV hereof.
The account described in
(b) Qualifying Medical Care Expenses: An expense incurred by a
Participant, or by the spouse or Dependent of such Participant,
for medical care as defined in Section 213(d) of the Code
(including without limitation amounts paid for hospital bills,
doctor and dental'bills, drugs and premiums for accident and
health insurance), but only to the-extent that the Participant or
other eligible person incurring the expense is not reimbursed for
the expense through insurance or otherwise (other than under the
Plan).
ARTICLE III. MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS
3.1 The maximum amount which a Participant
this Plan in the form of payments or
Qualifying Medical Expenses incurred in any
$2,000.
may receive under
reimbursements for
Plan Year shall be
A3-1
ARTICLE IV. MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNTS
4.1 Establishment of accounts. The Employer will establish and
maintain on its books a Medical Reimbursement Account for each
Plan Year with respect to each Participant who has elected under
the Flexible Benefits Plan to receive reimbursement of Qualifying
Medical Care Expenses incurred during the Plan Year.
4.2 Crediting of Accounts. There shall be credited to a
Participant's Medical Reimbursement Account for each Plan Year,
as of each date compensation is paid to the Participant in such
Plan Year, an amount equal to the reduction for medical
reimbursements, if any, to be made in such compensation in
accordance with the Participant's election under the Flexible
Benefits Plan. All amounts credited to each such Medical
Reimbursement Account shall be the property of the Employer until
paid out pursuant to Article V.
4.3 Debiting of accounts. A Participant's Medical
Reimbursement Account for each Plan Year shall be debited from
time to time the amount of any payment under Article V to or for
the benefit of the Participant for Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses incurred during such Plan Year. Amounts debited to each
such Medical Reimbursement Account shall be treated as payments
of the earliest amounts credited to the Account and not yet
treated as paid under this Section.
4.4 Forfeiture of accounts. The amount credited to a
Participant's Medical Reimbursement Account for any Plan Year
shall be used only to pay or reimburse the Participant for
Qualifying Medical Care Expenses incurred during such Plan Year,
and only if the Participant applies for payment or reimbursement
on or before the .30th day fOllowing the close of the Plan Year.
If any balance remains in the Participant's Medical Reimbursement
Account for any Plan Year after all reimbursements hereunder,
such balance shall not be carried over to reimburse the
Participant for Qualifying Medical Care Expenses incurred during
a subsequent Plan Year, and shall not be available to the
Participant in any other form or manner, but shall remain the
property of the Employer and the Participant shall forfeit all
rights with respect to such balance.
A3- 2
ARTICLE V. PAYMENT OF MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS
5.1 Claims for reimbursement. A Participant who has elected to
receive -medical reimbursements for a Plan Year may apply to the
Plan Administrator for reimbursement of Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses incurred by the Participant during the Plan Year by
submitting an application in writing to the Plan Administrator on
or before the 30th day following the close of the Plan Year, in
such form as the Plan Administrator may prescribe, setting
forth: (a) the amount, date and nature of the expense with
respect to which a benefit is requested; (b) the name of the
person, organization or entity to which the expense was or is to
be paid; (c) the name of the person for whom the expense was
incurred and, if such person is not the Participant requesting
the benefit, the relationship of such person to the Participant;
and (d) the amount recovered, or expected to be recovered, under
any insurance arrangement or other plan, with respect to the
expense. Such application shall be accompanied by bills,
invoices, receipts, cancelled checks or other statements showing
the amounts of such expenses, together with any additional
documentation which the Plan Administrator may request.
5.2 Reimbursement or payment of expenses. The Plan
Administrator shall reimburse the Participant from the
Participant's Medical Account for Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses incurred during the Plan Year, for which the Participant
submits documentation in accordance with Section 5.1. The Plan
Administrator may, at its option, pay any such Qualifying Medical
Care Expenses .directly to the person providing or supplying
medical care in lieu of reimbursing Participant. No
reimbursement or 'payment under this Section 5.2 of expenses
incurred during a Plan Year shall at any time exceed the balance
of the Participant's Medical Reimbursement Account for the Plan
Year at the time of the reimbursement or payment. The amount of
any Qualifying Medical Care Expense not reimbursed or paid as a
result of the preceding sentence shall be carried over and
reimbursed or paid only if and when the balance in such Account
permits such reimbursement or payment; provided however, that no
Qualifying Medical Care Expenses may be carried over from one
Plan Year to the next.
5.3 Indemnification of Employer by Participants. If any
Participant receives one or more payments for reimbursements
under Article V that are not for Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses, such Participants shall indemnify and reimburse the
Employer for any liability it may incur for failure to pay or
withhold federal or state income or employment tax from such
payment or reimbursements. However, such indemnification and
reimbursement shall not exceed th~ amount of additional federal
and state income tax that the Participant would have owed if the
payments or reimbursements had been made to the Participant as
regular ~a~h compensation. A3- 3
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: ,-t12,'~ Department of Public Works
DATE:
September 24, 1991
SUBJECT: Resolution 91- , Flood Control/Murrieta Creek
PREPARED BY: Douglas M. Stewart, Deputy City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Resolution 91- requesting that the Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District take the necessary steps and actions
to clear debris and grade the Murrieta Creek Channel through the City of Temecula.
DISCUSSION:
The City has been requested by Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District (RCFCD) to lend support for obtaining the necessary permits and
clearances to clear the Murrieta Creek Channel to obtain needed flood-carrying
capacity. This Resolution is to provide assistance to the RCFCD in obtaining the
necessary approvals to perform this work.
pwO 1 \~gdrpt\0924fldc.ont
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS AND ACTIONS TO CLEAR DEBRIS AND
GRADE THE MURRIETA CREEK CHANNEL THROUGH THE CITY OF
TE1VIECULA.
WHEREAS, Both the City of Temecula and the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District recognize that the natural growth of phreatophytes and
sedimentation have in recent years diminished the flood-carrying capacity of Muraleta Creek
through the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, this diminishment of flood-carrying capacity poses a serious safety concern
for citizens of the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance 91-12, an ordinance of the City Council of
the City of Temecula adopting regulations regarding flood damage prevention, the City Council
wishes to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
is requested to proceed with obtaining all necessary permits from the U.S. Army Corps. of
Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game and any other pertinent agency for the
purpose of removing vegetation from Murrieta Creek Channel and grading the channel to carry
a minimum of the equivalent 1980 flood, without the floodwaters overtopping the existing
channel banks.
SECTION 2. That all costs for grading and removing vegetation from the channel will
be borne by underlying property owners and/or the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District.
SECTION 3. That the City will reasonably assist the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District in obtaining property owners permission to perform the work,
where property is not owned or an easement is not grauted to the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District.
5/r~so206 -1-
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this day of __, 1991.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 91-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the . day of , 1991, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5/nso206 -2-
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
~)c~ Department of Public Works
September 24, 1991
AWARD OF ANNUAL STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
PREPARED BY:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award contracts for Annual Street Maintenance to Ramtek Contractors,
Inc. of Temecula, and Russell Tourville Construction of Rancho Cucamonga; and authorize the
Mayor to execute the Contract.
BACKGROUND:
On June 25, 1991, the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to solicit bids
for implementation of' an Annual Street Maintenance Program. The proposed program
includes, but is not limited to, pothole patching, minor overlays, culvert cleaning, minor
concrete repairs, and traffic striping. It is anticipated that major overlay and seal coat projects
will still follow the Public Works bidding procedures. The current proposal specifies unit prices
for a number of standard items and is to include all labor, supervision, equipment,
mobilization, materials, tools and incidentals. Certified payrolls will be used to insure
prevailing wages are being adhered to. Performance Bonds are not required unless an
individual assignment exceeds $10,000. The contract will expire on June 30, 1992, but may
be reviewed by mutual agreement of both parties for up to five (5) years as adjusted by the
prevailing construction cost index.
On August 1, 1991, the City Clerk opened the following bids at City Hall:
2.
3.
4.
Ramtek Contractors, Inc., Temecula
Russell Tourville Construction, Rancho Cucamonga
C & C Ltd., Temecula
IPS Services, Inc., San Bernardino
The County of Riverside was invited to submit a proposal, but was unable to meet the
submittal requirements. A comparison of the submitted unit prices (see attached) revealed
that the majority of the low unit prices were submitted by Ramtek Contractors and Russell
Tourville Construction, with Ramtek Contractors having the lowest overall bid. By entering
I pwOl\agdrpt\O924stmt.con
into a Maintenance Contract with each of the two (2) low bidders, the Public Works Staff can
analyze each proposed maintenance project and insure that the City receives the lowest unit
price for the particular type of work. In addition, in times of emergency, the City will have
two (2) contractors available to respond.
Each of these firms are qualified and a check of their references indicates that their
performance is satisfactory.
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
The approved budget for FY 91-92 was allocated $680,000.00 under Account Number 5402
for routine street maintenance. It is anticipated that approximately $300,000.00 will be used
for routine maintenance with the remainder being available for larger resurfacing projects.
2 pwOl\agdrpt\O924stmt.con
BID ITEM COMPARISON BY UNIT PRICES
* Bid RAMTEK IPS C & C
Item
1 5.00 23.00 8.45
2A 4.75 200.00 Min. 60.97
B 4.25 8.25 18.29
C 3.75 3.50 14.85
D 3.25 2.75 11.42
E 2.50 2.50 6.66
F 1.75 2.00 6.66
3A 5.60 300.00 Min. 70.97
B 5.10 12.00 21.29
C 4.60 5.75 26.04
D 4.10 4.50 24.04
E 3.35 4.00 8.59
F 2.60 3.50 8.59
4A 6.45 400.00 Min. 70.97
B 5.95 16.00 21.69
C 5.45 9.00 26.44
D 4.95 6.50 24.44
E 4.20 6.00 8.99
F 3.45 5.25 8.99
5A 8.50 150.00 Min. 50.97
B 2.50 4.50 16.29
C 1.50 2.50 12.00
D 1.25 1.75 6.00
E 1.00 1.50 2.42
F .75 .75 2.42
6 1.75 12.50 1.25
7 1.50 9.50 .98
8A 18.00 40.00 23.22
B 19.00 ......
9 15.00 & 16.00 35.00 16.47
10 7.50 31.50 9.18
11 4.75 30.00 8.10
12 8.75 32.50 9.72
13 .84 2.00 .50
14 1.64 4.00 .95
15 10.00 25.00 65.00
T: 161.28: 1,374.50 .~ :: 682.26
RUSSELL
TOURVILLE
4.00
4,10
3.50
2.75
2.50
2.20
4,80
4.50
4.25
3.75
3.50
3.30
5.50
5.25
5.00
4.75
4.20
4.25
1.75
1.40
1.00
.95
.65
.60
5.00
4.50
25.00
14.00
7.00
5.00
16.00
4.95
7.50
12.00
i~179.50:
* SEE ATTACHED BID SCHEDULE FOR CORRESPONDING BID ITEM
-2-
pwO 1 \tds\mem\0910annm.ain
BID SCHEDULE I
FOR
STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
(NON-EMERGENCY)
Unit prices are to include all labor, supervision, equipment, mobilization, material, tools and
incidentals.
Quantity unit Prices unit Prices
Item No. Description Description On Figures) on Words)
1. Untreated Base Per Ton $ $
2. Remove and Replace Asphalfic $ $
Concrete, up to 4'
a. 1-30 S.'F. S.F. $ $
b. 31-100 S.F. S.F. $ $
c. 101-250 S.F. S.F. $ $
d. 251-500 S.F. S.F. $ $
e. 501-2,000 S.F. S.F. $ $
f. 2,k001 + Over S.F. S.F. $ $
Remove and Replace Asphaltic
Concrete, 4'-8"
a. 1-30 S.F. S.F. $ $
b. 31-100 S.F. S.F. $ $
c. 101-250 S.F. S.F. $ $
d. 251-500 S.F. S.F. $ $
e. 501-2,000 S.F. S.F. $ $
f. 2,001 + Over S.F. S.F. $ $
Remove and Replace Asphaltic Concrete, 8" -12"
PROPOSAL P-4
Remove and Replace Asphaltic Concrete, 8" -12'
a. 1-30 S.F. S.F. $
b. 31-100 S.F. S.F. $
c. 101-250 S.F. S.F. $
d. 251-500 S.F. S.F. $
e. 501-2,000 S.F. S.F. $
f. 2,001 + Over S.F. S.F. $
$
$
$
$
$
$
11/2 Asphaltic Cap
a. 1-30 S.F. S.F. $
b. 31-100 S.F. S.F. $
c. 101-250 S.F. S.F. $
d. 251-500 S.F. S.F. $
e. 501-2,000 S.F. S.F. $
f. 2,001 + Over S.F. S.F. $
$
$
$
$
$
$
Crack Sealing less S.F. $
than 1,500 S.F.
Crack Sealing over S.F. $
1,500
Remove and Replace PCC L. F.
Curb and Gutter, APWA
Riverside County
Std. #200-201
Remove and Replace PC L. F.
Curb
PROPOSAL P-5
10.
11.
12.
Remove and Replace PCC S. F.
Driveway Approach
Remove and Replace PCC S. F.
4' Sidewalk
Remove and Replace
8' Cross Gutter
S.F.
13.
14.
15.
Saw Cutting, 1" to 4' L.F. $
Saw Cutting 5" to 10" L.F. $
Depth
Graf~ti Removal S.F. $
$
$
PROPOSAL
ITEM
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
.D,_~ment of Public Works
September 24, 1991
SUBJECT:
Final Parcel Map No. 23335
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council APPROVE Final Parcel Map No. 23335 subject to the Conditions
of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335, Amended No. 1 was approved by the Riverside
County Planning Commission on August 3, 1988, and the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on October 4, 1988. The City Council approved the First Extension of
Time on March 26, 1991.
Parcel Map No. 23335 is a six (6) lot commercial subdivision of 10.18 acres. The
Parcel Map is located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road and is
part of Zone Change No. 5163. The applicant is Bedford Properties.
The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Parcel Map No. 23335:
* Area Drainage Fees (Deferred to Building Permits)
* Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees (Deferred to Building Permits)
',* Stephen's K-Rat Fees (at Grading Permits)
$5,841.33
$14,255.00
$19,851.00
A:FPM23335 1
The following bonds have been paid for Final Parcel Map No. 23335:
Faithful Labor and
Performance Materials
Streets & Drainage N/A --
Water N/A --
Sewer N/A --
Survey Monuments $ 2,904.00 $ 0.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not determined.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Final Tract Map No. 23335 subject
to the Conditions of Approval·
BY:ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Development Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Planning Dep.a_rtment Staff Report
dated March 26, 1991
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Staff Report
dated February 25, 1991
Planning Commission
dated February 25, 1991
Action of City Council to
Approve Resolution
A:FPM23335 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Final Parcel Map No. 23335
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fe~
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 1
N/A
Condition No. 16
Condition No. 12
Letter Dated 6-13-88
Letter Dated 6-22-88
SANDEFKM\FORMS\FEESECUR.ENG
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 23335
DATE: August 30, 1991
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Streets and Drainage $ --
Water $ --
Sewer $ '-
TOTAL $ N/A
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ --
$ --
$ --
$ N/A
*Maintenance Retention (10% for one year)
*(or Bonds if work is completed)
$ N/A
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee- SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees :
Planning Fee
Quimby Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
Fee Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,904.00
-0-
5,841.33
14,255.00
-0-
-0-
106.00
-0-
8.00
850.00
-0-
651.76
1,615.76
-0-
SAN D EFKM\FORMS\FEESECU R. EN G 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
March 26, 1991
First Extension of Time
Tentative Parcel Map 23335
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
.PREPARED BY:
Richard Ayala
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First Extension of
Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 based on the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Bedford Properties
REPRESENTATIVE:
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
PROPOSAL:
Six (6) commercial lot subdivision of 10.18 acres.
First Extension of Time
LOCATION:
North of Junction of Winchester Road and Ynez
Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial )
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: I-P { Industrial Park)
South: C-P-S ~ Scenic Highway
Commercial )
East: C-P-S ~ Scenic Highway
Commercial )
West: C-P-S ( Scenic Highway
Commercial )
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested
STAFF R PT\TPM23335
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Vacant
North: Industrial Park
South: Commercial
East: Vacant
West: Commercial
Total Acreage: 10.18
No. of Lots: 6
First Extension of Time application for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 23335 was submitted to the City on
September 18, 1990. On February 25. 1991, it was
presented to the City of Temecula Planning
Commission and was approved by a ~-0 vote based
on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff
Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval. The property is located north of the
junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. At
present, the subject site is vacant and graded land.
Westerly of the property, there is an office
building, a CarPs Jr., and graded land. The
subject site is currently zoned C-P-S (Scenic
Highway Commercial ).
Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First
Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map
No. 23335 based on the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report and subject to
the attached Conditions of Approval.
· RA:ks
Attachment:
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Staff Report
dated February 25, 1991
Development Fee Checklist
Planning Commission Minutes
dated February 25, 1991
STAFF R PT\TPM23335 2
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335 A SIX (6)
PARCEL COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION OF 10.18 ACRES
LOCATED NORTH OF JUNCTION OF WINCHESTER ROAD
AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 910-011-031 PORTION,
WHEREAS, Bedford Properties Inc. filed the Time Extension in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Time Extension application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extension on
February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approved said Time Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
· SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
a) There is a reasonable probability that the
Time Extension proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 1
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan·
c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Time Extension is consistent with the SWAP
and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
{1 ) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that the Time
Extension proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. ( 1 ) Pursuant to Section 18.30( c), no Time Extension may
be approved unless the following findings can be made:
STAFFRPT\TPM23335
a)
The proposed use must conform to all the
General Plan requirements and with all
applicable requirements of state law and City
ordinances.
b)
The proposed subdivision does not affect the
general health, safety, and welfare of the
public.
(2) ThePlanningCommission, inapprovin9theproposed
Time Extension, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will be
consistent with the City's future General
Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law, due to
the fact that the project is consistent with
existing site development standards in that it
proposes articulated design features and site
amenities commensurate with existing and
anticipated commercial development
standards.
b)
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted general plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with
existing and anticipated land use and design
guidelines standards.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with
state planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use conforms with
those uses listed as "allowed" within the
project site's existin9 C-P-S ( Scenic Highway
Commercial ) land use designation.
d)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the
fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed facility structures; adequate
landscaping will be provided along the
project's public and private frontages; and
the internal circulation plan should not create
traffic conflicts as design provisions will be
STAFFRPT\TPM23335. 3
S~ ~,FFRPT\TPM23335
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
in conformance with adopted City standards.
The project, as designed and conditioned.
will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions
stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 is compatible
with surrounding land uses. The density
creates a compatible physical relationship
with adjoining properties, due to the fact
that the proposal is similar in compatibility
with surrounding land uses; and has
adequate area in order to provide for siting
of proposed development.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed project is consistent
with the current zoning of the subject site
( C-P-S; Scenic Highway Commercial ) and also
consistent with the adopted Southwest Area
Community Plan ( SWAP ) designation of
Commercial.
The project, as designed and conditioned,
will not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Negative
Declaration adopted by the County for the
project, due to the fact that impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project's
Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the project will propose independent
access points from Winchester Road and
Possibly Ynez Road which have been
determined to be adequate by the City
Engineer.
j)
The design of the subdivision and the type of
improvements are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to
the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and the project analysis.
k)
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECT ION 2, the Time Extension
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that
the previous environmental determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 32718) still applies to said Parcel Map (Extension of
Time).
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves The
T
First Extension of Time for entative Parcel Map No. 23335 for a six (6) parcel
Commercial Subdivision of 10.18 located north of junction of Winchester Road and
Ynez Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-011-031 Portion subject to the
fol Iowi ng conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Resolution.
SECTION ~.~. The City Clerk shall certify the
adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of February, 1991.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
CITY OF TEMECULA )
2R
2356
10
1621
PP
PP2
23335
VICINITY MAP
CASE NO.
P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA
r
CZ 4' ;-7
A- I-iO
I-P
~.Z 4078
M- SC(
/M-SC
CZ 4607
#I
1
4078
G-P-S
CZ 4565
RR
~ M-SC
j
{
ZONE MAP ) CAsE NO. ,~,M/
P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SWAP
MAP
"~
CASE NO../3v/
P.C. DATE
Tentative Parcel
County. of RIverside,.
WincheSter
Map Nc
$t/.te Of California,
Meadows
23335
/
EXi41~
CASE #
~ HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 25th day of February, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\TPM23335
ATTACHMENTII
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No· 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
Prior to any construction on the area shown as remainder, the applicant shall
file for a Certificate of Compliance with the Planning Department.
e
This conditionally approved extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map No.
23335 will expire one year after the original expiration date, unless extended
as provided by Ordinance q60. The expiration date is October q, 1991·
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department·
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions,
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~60.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 9
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district:
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
CalTrans.
Prior to recordat·on of the final map, the developer shall provide evidence
that Assessment District 161 will construct the improvements on Winchester
Road, in accordance with County Standard 100, Section A (1101113~).
In' the event that the Assessment District 161 will not construct the
improvements. the developer shall be required to construct or bond for the
required improvements.
Sufficient right-d-way along Winchester Road shall be confirmed to exist or
conveyed for public use to provide for a public street for public use to
provide for a 67 foot half width right-of-way.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
10.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions I CCSR's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCF, R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City·
The CCF, R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CC~,R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense·
The CCSR's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
The CCF, R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney· They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
STAFF R PT\TPM23335 10
d, -
The CCBR's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation.
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CCF, R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCF, R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCF, R~s, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform. at the owner~s sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CCE, R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements
ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads,
drives or parking areas shall be provided by CCF, R's or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the
issuance of building permit where no map is involved.
11. County Road Condition Number lq shall be deleted.
12.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
13.
The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the
area within the 100-year floodplain.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
15.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 11
16.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
17.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road and
Ynez Road, and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
18.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact CalTrans and City
Transportation Engineering for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
19.
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour
or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
20.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
All Conditions of Approval stated in the County Road Department letter dated
June 23, 1988 shall still apply to this project.
STAFFRPT\TPM23335 12
DATE
October 4, 1988
' =IiVE iDE COUII v
me
PLAngin DEPA mEn
TO:
Surveyor
Road
Butlding & Safety
Flood Control
Health
Fire Protection
RE:
(~IV~,~Jt ~' u.,
The Rheaside County l"] Planning DirectoriESBoard of Supervisors has taken the following
action on the above referenced tentative map:
xx APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions (no waiver request submitted)
DENIED tentative map based on the,attached findings.
APPROVED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for waiver
of the ftnal map.
APPROVED tentative map and APPROVED request for waiver of the final mp.
APPROVED ~ Extension of TIme to
subject to
"' '; .',~ ,!~.: r ;:F .% 7 i ...;.~.;.~... conditions.
.... :~,' ' ': I..' I I 1. l: .',' I !.~ I:' '~:. ;', ', ,~','
APPROVED withdrawal of~'ikehtatHve map: ....................... '
APPROVED Minor Change to r~l~,.s~ origt~nally approved conditions as shown (attached).
APPROVED Minor Change to revise'6~tnally approved map (attached). -
subject
. DENIED request for Minor Change.
..... APPROVED Minor Change to waive the final map.
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director
Richard J.~acHott, Su.~ervising Planner
- SURVEYOR - WHITE ROAD - BLUE
~.x~ cb,. to/u~ HEALTH - PINK
4080 LEMON STREET, 9t" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 181-6181
BUILDING & SAFETY - GREEN
FIRE PROTECTION - GOLDENROD
FLOOD- CANARY
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM .9,, ~
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 9 ? 2 ',.
(619) 342:-'. ::'.:
~R~:rs
8-9-88
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: The Planning Department SUBMITTAL DATE:
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE 5163, TENTATIVE COffiERCIAL PARCEL :lAP
~-...,~..;
NO. 23335 -RANCHO CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT COtlPANY - First Supervisorial
District - Rancho California Area lO.18 Acres - 6 Lots - Schedule E - REQUEST:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Change of Zoning from R-R to C-1/C-P.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment
No. 32718 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not
have a significant effect on the environment; and
DENIAL of Change of Zone No. 5163 from R-R to C-1/C-P in accordance
with Exhibit 2, based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planning Commission minutes dated August 3, 1988; but,
APPROVAL of Change of Zone No. 5163 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance
with Exhibit 4, based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planning Commission minutes dated August 3, 1988; and
APPROVAL of Tentative Conmnercial Parcel Map No. 23335 subject to the
attached conditions, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the P~anning Connission minutes dated August 3, 1988.
P1'P' A""' rpf
Dep- Cornm,nrs Di.~,
AGENDA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1988
(AGENDA ITE14 3-1 - REEL 995, SIDE I - TAPE 1, SIDE 2)
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 5163 - EA 32718 - Rancho California Development Company -
Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - 10.16~ acres, north of
Junction of Winchester Rd and Ynez Rd - R-R to C-l/C-P, etc.
PARCEL NAP 23335 AHENDED NO. I - EA 32718 - Rancho California Development
Company - Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - north of
Junction of Winchester Rd and Ynez Rd - 6 lots - lO.IB, acres - Schedule E
The hearings were opened at 11:11 a.m. and closed at 11:21 a.m.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the negative declaration for EA 32718,
denial of Change of Zone Case 5163 from R-R to C-l/C-P, approval of Change of
Zone Case 5163 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance with Exhibit 4, and approval of
Parcel Hap 23335 Amended No. 1. Staff had originally rec~T~ended approval of
the C-1/C-P zone as requested, as they felt a commercial use would be compat-
ible with surrounding development which included vacant lands, single family
residences, a. pasture and dairy, and c~nmercial uses. However, after a
further review, they had determined that the C-P-S zone would be more
appropriate as it would protect Winchester Road from outdoor advertising.
Robert Kimble, representing the applicant, requested approval of the C-1/C-P
zone as it would provide more flexibility in selecting future uses. In answer
to a question by Commissioner Donahoe, Nr. Kimble advised they did not have
any. proposed uses at the present time.
Mr. Ktmble requested deletion of Road Department Condition 14 which restricted
access on Hargarita Road; this had been a condition of their original map
submittal and the area covered by the map had been reduced so that they no
longer had frontage on Hargartta Road. Ms. Johnson agreed to the deletion of
Condition 14. Nr. Kimble then requested that Conditions 2 through 5 of the
Flood Control Dtstrtct's conditions be deleted and replaced with conditions
which he had submitted to the District; he read these conditions into the
record at that time. (The conditions related to the construction of
facilities required as part of the Fiurrteta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area
Drainage Plan). Ed Lotz of the Flood Control District advised Fir. Kashuba had
been required to leave the meeting; however, Fir. Kashuba had discussed the
applicant's proposal with Flood Control staff and they did not endorse the
proposed changes. Mr. Lotz requested that the Rood Control conditions be
retained as originally presented.
Con~nisstoner Bresson asked about access; there was an access opening on
Winchester between Lots 3 and 4, and he wanted to know how Lots 2 and 5would
receive access. Mr. ,lohnson explained State Highway 79 (Winchester Road) in
this area was a six lane divided highway and had a greater access restriction
than the Count's lesser road system. Road Department Condition 16 required a
bustnessman's association to provide for reciprocal parking and legal access.
Fir. Klotz asked whether a bustnessman's association was needed for any other
reason; when informed there was no other purpose for the association, Mr.
Klotz advised a businessman's association was not necessary as the reciprocal
parking and ~cess could _be accomplished through CC&R r~qutr___~_en____ts. He
11
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1988
furnished wording to replace Road Department Condition 16 as currently
written.
There was no further testimony, and the hearing was closed at 11:21 a.m.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant is proposing to change the zoning on
10.18 acres in the Rancho California area from R-R to C-1/C-P and subdivide
the parcels into 6 lots; surrounding zoning includes M-5C, I-P, R-R, R-5, R-3,
R-4, A-2-20, R-2 and C-P-S; the subject site is currently vacant; surrounding
land uses include graded and vacant land, single family residences under
construction, a pasture and dairy, and commercial uses along 1-15; the project
site lies within Planning Area 'F' of the Rancho Villages Policy Plan on the
Open Space and Conservation Pap of the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan; Planning Area 'F' is designated for con~nercial land uses along
Winchester and east of 1-15 in the Rancho Villages Policy Plan; environmental
concerns include liquefaction, groundshaking, flooding, noise, possible
impacts to agriculture, energy resources, scenic highways and paleontological
resources but these concerns, with the exception of the impact on scenic
highways, can be mitigated through conformance with the conditions of
ap roval; the impact on scenic highways can be mitigated by approval of the
C-~-S zone. The proposed C-1/C-P would allow outdoor advertising and would
therefore not protect the scenic qualities of Winchester Road. The
recommended C-P-S zone and Parcel Pap 23335 Amended No. I would be more
consistent with the adjacent C-P-S zoning, would protect the scenic qualities
of Winchester Road, would be consistent with the Rancho Villages Policy Plan
and the. Comprehensive General Plan; compatible with area zoning and develop-
ment; consistent with the applicable provisions of Ordinances 348 and 460; and
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Commissioner
Purviance and unanimously carried, the Commission recommended to the Board of
te
Supervisors adoption of h negative declaration for EA 32718, a royal of
Change of Zone Case 5163 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance with ExKVbit 4, and
'approval of Parcel Map 23335 Amended No. I subject to the proposed conditions,
with the Road Department conditions amended as follows, based on the above
findings and conclusions and the recommendations of staff.
14. Delete Entirely
16. Delete as currently written and replace with the following: P tor to
the ordatton Qf the final map or any phase thereof, the applicant
Shml~ec~cora Cr&R~ providing for reciprocal larktnq and leqal accesS.
ROLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLOWS:
AYES:
NOES:
Conntsstoners Bresson, Smith, Beadling, Purvtance and Donahoe
None
ABSENT: None
12
PINKS
Zoning Area: Rancho California
First Su ervisorial District
E.A. Number 32718
Regional Team No. I
CO~ERCIAL PARCEL MAP RO. 23335
AMENDED RO. 1
CHANGE OF ZOMERO. 5163
Planning Commission: 8-03-88
Agenda Item No, 3-1
RIVERSIDE COJMTY PLANNING DEPARIMEMT
STAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2; Engineer/Rep.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Location:
5. Existing Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
9. Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
10, Land Division Data:
·
11. Agency Recommendations:
12. Letters:
13. Sphere of Influence:
~ALYSIS:
Rancho Caltfornta Development Co. --
Robert liein, William Frost and Assoc.
To change the zoning from R-R to C-1/C-P
and subdivide lO.IB acres into 6 lots.
North of Junction of Winchester Road and
Ynez Road
R-R
R-2, C-P-S, C-l/C-P, M-SC, R-R, I-P,
R-S, R-3, R-4, and A-2-20
Currently fl at and vacant. It i s
covered by dry grass and brush and
scattered trees.
Vacant and graded land, substations, a
dairy, single family residential under
construction and commercial buildings.
Land Use: Rancho Villages
Total Acreage: 10.18
Total Lots: 6
See letters dated:
Road: 6-23-88
Heal th: 6-16-88
F1 ood: 6-22-88
Ftre: 6-13-88
Bldg & Safety (grading): 6-10-88
Mt. Palomar: 4-26-88
Opposin/Supporting: None received
Not witRtn a City Sphere
ProJect Description
zoning on 10.18 acres in the Rancho California zoning area from
Residential) to C-1/C-P (General Commercial) and subdivide the propert into 6
schedule 'E' lots. The property is located North of the Junction of W~nchester
Road and Ynez Road.
COR~RCIAL PARCEL RAP RO. 23335
NFrJIDED RO. 1
CHANGE OF ZONE I10. 5163
Staff Report
Page 2
Land Use and Zontng
At present, the subject stte is vacant. Surrounding land uses Include
rimartly vacant and graded land with a pasture and a dairy located
~outheasterly of the project site. Westerly of the pro erty, there t an
office Building, a Carl's Jr. and graded land. A commercral center is located
across 1-15 to the west. The subject site is currently zoned R-R. Surrounding
zoning includes H-SC, I-P and R-R to the north, R-5, R-3 and R-4 located
Northeasterly of the project, R-R, A-2-20 and R-2 located Southeasterly of the
site. To the west, and across 1-15 there is C-P-S, C-1/C-P and M-SC.
Envfronmental Assessment
Environmental Assessment No. 32718 indicated that liquefaction, groundshaking,
flooding, and possible noise, impact the site. Development of the property
could also impac~ agriculture, energy resources, scenic highways and potential
paleontological resources.
County Geologic Report No. 509 has been prepared for the site and has been
approved by the County Geologist. Mitigation for liquefaction will be
implemented through the conditions of approval. Groundshaking will be
mitigated through adherence to the Uniform Building Code Standards. Flooding
hazards will be mitigated through Flood Control's conditions of approval. All
noise impacts will be mitigated through proper building design and Uniform
Building Code regulations. The subject site is not currently being used for
a riculture purposes as it is located adjacent to existing commercial uses. A
alological Report was prepared and no significant impact on wildlife was found.
The project site is mapped as having a potential for thermal waters beneath its
surface, however at the present time there is no economically feasible way to
h
harness this energy resource, therefore mitigation is not possible at t is
time. Landscape plans will be required prior to the issuance of building
t
perinits in order to maintain the freeway's and h ghway's aesthetic view. An
archaeological report was prepared for the site and no significant artifacts
were found. A qualified paleontologist will be required to be on site during
grading.
General Plan
The project site lies within theRancho Villages Policy Plan on the Open Space
and Conservation Map in the Comprehensive General Plan. Nore specifically, the
subject site falls within Planning Area 'F" of the Rancho Villages Poltc Plan.
Planning Area "F' is designated for a combination of Industrial, commercial and
residential uses. Industrial and commercial uses, more commonly called
"Employment Center East", which are located north of Winchester Road will take
C(leiERCIAL PARCEL RAP NO. 23335
NERI:)ED R0. 1
CHANGE OF ZONE RO. 5163
Staff Report
Pa$e 3
advantage of the immediate freeway access and Winchester Road. Since the
proposed project is located northwesterly of Winchester and Easterly of 1-15
and falls within the allowable commercial acreage called forth for Plannin
Area 'F', it is consistent with the Rancho Villages Cormunity Policy Plan an3
Comprehensive General Plan.
FINDINGS:
The applicant is proposing to change the zoning on 10.1B acres in the
Rancho California area from R-R to C-1/C-P and subdivide the parcels into 6
lots.
2. The subject site is currently zoned R-R. Surrounding zoning includes ~SC,
I-P, R-R, R-5, R-3, R-4, A-2-20, R-2, and C-P-S.
The subject site is currently vacant. Surrounding land uses include graded
and vacant land, single family residences under construction, a pasture and
a dairy and c.~nmercial uses along 1-15.
The project site lies within Planning Area "F" of the Rancho Villages
Policy Plan on the Open Space and Conservation Hap of the Riverside County
· Comprehensive..General Plan.
Planning Area "F' is designated for cenmerctal land uses along Winchester
and East of 1-15 in the Rancho Villages Policy Plan.
Environmental concerns include liquefaction, groundshaking, flooding,
noise, possible impacts to agriculture, energy resources, scenic highways,
and paleontological resources. The concerns can be mitigated through
conformance with the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed zone change and subdivision are consistent with the Rancho
Villages Policy Plan and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
2. The proposed zone change and subdivision are compatible with area zoning
and development.
3. The proposed zone change and subdivision are consistent with the applicable
provision of Ordinance 348 and Ordinance 460.
4. The proposed zone change and subdivision will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
COI~ERCIAL PARCEL MAP RO. 23335
AMENDED MO. 1
CHAJ~E OF ZONE RO. 5163
Staff Report
Page 4
RECOMMENDATIONS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32718
based on the findings that the project will not have a significant effect on
the environment; and,
APPROVAL of C~ARGE OF ZONE NO. 5163 from R-R to C-1/C-P in accordance with
~xnlblt z; and
APPROVAL of COIIERCIAL PARCEL RAP ~0. 23335, AMERDED ~0. I subject to the
attached conditions, and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in
this staff report,
GN:sc
7/25/88
i
i CZ 5~3/PM
VAC.
! LAND USE
VAC.
",GRADED
GRADED
PASTURe:-'_--'_?
VAC ·
OFFICE II..~Q
I1
VAC. . ./
f
',
'-.,
lpp. RANCHO CALIF. DEV. CO, '
Are~ 1t0, CALl E
Ckc~lafion WINCHESTER RDL URBAN ART, 134' '
Element ~ FREEWAY VARIABLE .
5163 / PM 2:5535
RIIBR
I PROPOSED ZONING
Ii
I
I
RIIII~R
2
% >' R-4
Milllea
R-R '/,~'!.
- f~il! i I
II Ii ,
I II/
,,//
RimmR
C-P-S
C-P-S
'App. RANCHO CAME DEV. CO.
Use R - R TO C-I/C-P
Are, 1t0. CALl R Sup. I:)lst.
s,:. T. 7 s..,. 3w. A,,,,,o,', ok. It? P,.
Circulation WINCHESTER RD URBAN ART. 134'
[lemenf I~ FRE~:WAY VARIABLE
Rd. ek. h 55C Oete 7/6/88 I:Wewn By jcwc/,./;.
Tentative Parcel
County of Riverside,.
Winchester
Map No.
State of California
Meadows
23335
Amended Mop No I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARll[NT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE COR(RCIAL PARCEL MAP NO 23335,
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action,
or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers,
or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the
County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning COHNERCIAL TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 23335, AND. #l,
which action is brought within the time period provided for in
California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside
will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in
the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of
any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside.
2. The tentative.parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance
-460, Schedule E unless modified by the conditions listed below. This
approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of
Supervisors approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
3. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or
licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of
California Subdivision Map Act, Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance
460.
4. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and
shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons
such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as
approved by the County Road Conmnissioner. Street names shall be subject
to approval of the Road Commissioner.
5. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for
nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of
dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed
by the Riverside County Surveyor.
6. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the
parcel map boundary to a County maintained road.
7. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
TENTATIVE PARCEL leAP N0. 23335
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
8. Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be
submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety.
9. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recomendations
outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated June 23, 1988, a
copy of which is attached.
10. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health
reconmendattons outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal
dated June 16, 1988, a copy of which is attached.
11. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recon~endations
outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control Distrtct's letter dated
june 22, 1988, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies
within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25
of Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for
the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
Road Conmnissi~ner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of
parcel map.
12. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recomendations
· outlined in :the County Fire Department's letter dated june 13, 1988, a
copy of which is attached.
13. The subdivider shall comply with the reconmnendations outlined in the
Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated June
lO, 1988, a copy of which is attached.
14. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory reconmnendations dated April 26, 1988, a
copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the reconmnendattons outlined in the
County Geologic Report No. 509 and the County Geologist letter dated
July 13, 1988, a copy of which ts attached.
TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 23335 Ale. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
ENVZR(:)NI~NTAL CONSTRATNT SHEET CONDTTZONS:
25. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be
permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the
recordation of the final mp, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to
the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Oepartment of Building and Safety. The following
note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"County Archaeological .Report No. 1217 was prepared for this
property on March 30, 1988 by Christopher 5. Orover PhD, and is
on file at the Riverside County Planning Oepartment.
"County BIological Report No. 212 was prepared for this property
in Nay 1988 by the Planning Center, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Oepartment.
"County Geological Report No. 509 was prepared for this property
in Nay, 1988 by Leighton and Associates, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Oepartment. Specific items of concern
in the report are liquefaction hazards·
25. The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor. These constraints affect all parcels."
GM:aea
7-27-88
..; ,.,',: ':'7':" = .
_~'~'J~ RI.I~'A'RSIDE ,,;'
LoRo , S,,,oo
lOAD COMMISSIONEl i COUNTY SUIVEYOI
OFFICE OF ROAD CO.M.MISSIO,%'ER 6 COUNTY St RVEYOR
June 23, 1988
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Re:. Parcel Nap 23335 - Amend #1
Schedule E - Team I
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvement plans and/or road dedications tn accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It Is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate Q's,Jnd that their omission or unacceptabtlity may require the map
to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are Intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a coeplete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road
Commtssioner's Office.
',i
.!
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map
and noted as follows: '0rainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encruachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Commissioner pemtts the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Parcel MAP 23335 - Amend #1
· Jun~ 23, 1988
Page 2
3. Major drainage Is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall comply with the Caltrans reconnendations as
outlined in their letter dated March 2, 1988 (a copy of which is
attached), prior to the recordation of the final map.
A copy of the final map shall be submitted to Caltrans, District 08,
Post Office Box 231, San Bernardino, California 92403; Attention:
Project Development for review and approval prior to recordation.
Ynez Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 38
feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; recon-
struction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the
Road Commissioner within a SO foot half width dedicated right of way
tn accordance with County Standard No. 101.
7. All'driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
e
Winchester Road including R.C.W.D. lots fronttng Winchester Road
shall.be improved with concrete curb and gutter located S5 feet from
centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction or
resurfactng of existing paving as determined by Caltrans within a
67 foot half width dedicated right of way.
Prior' to the recordatton of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road department, a cash sum of
$2,500 per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal impacts.
Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may
enter Into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
10. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extend-
ing a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade
and alignment as approved by the RIverside County Road Commissioner.
Completion of road Improvements does not Imply acceptance for
maintenance by County.
I
11. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State
Standard Specifications.
Parcel Map 23335 - Amend #1
dune 23, 19'88
Page 3
12. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
13. Lot access shall be restricted on Ynez Road and so noted on the
final map with the exception of one access opening located at the
northwest corner of parcel 1.
.14. Lot access shall be restricted on Nargartta Road and so noted on
the final map with the exception of that portion of parcel 14
I ½;.?,t,F I ~l~,/~
abutting Nargartta Road. ~iz ~ ,{~ 7 ~12 '
15. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460
and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA)
Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. If not, the applicant shall
file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of
a 'Lighting Assessment District' in accordance with Governmental
Code Section 56000.
Prior to recordatton of the final map or any phase the applicant
shall establish a bustnessmans association to provide for
reciprocal parking and legal access.
17. Lot access shall be restricted on Winchester Road and so noted
on the final map with the exception of a 35' driveway located
between parcels 3 and 4 as approved by Caltrans.
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Road Division Engineer
County of Riverside
,-- TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
RE: PARCEL MAP 2355S, Amended No. 1
DATE: June 16. 1988
, E~vironmental Health Services
Environmental Health Services has reviewed Parcel Map 23335,
Amended No. I dated June 9, 1988. Our current comments will
remain as stated in our letter dated April 29, 1988.
~M:tac
f
r
JUN 2 1 1988
RIVE,~iuc CuUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GLN. FORM 4, (i~v. 8/87)
l
'COUNTY oF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT2
April 29, 1988
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
N.C N(M.K IVM.,M.I~H.
Attn: Gloria Maciel
RIVERISlE CC',JNT~'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
III<N IllTIll
RAMSIV STREET
IANNING. CA 92220
II. YTNI. CA 92225
IAIA IL&lCa
1240 MARGUERITA
IIIVERSID(. CA 12504
S05 SOUTH IIJ(NA VISTA
CO~0NA. CA 11720
illlit
II0 NORTH STATE ST.
teEMit. CA S2343
IllIll
dS.20l OASIS STREET
IMDIO. CA 12201
Lill Ikllltll
3011s FRASER P. ,
LAKE ELIINO~E. CA. ll330
13rf;5 TAHOJtTZ-4dcCaLLU~
231 NORTH 'O' STIlEIT
IERRIS. CA IX3/O
IlYlllltl
152o LINDEN ITREET
liVERSIDE. CA. Ill0?
IUIIDOUS
BIll MISSlOel ILVD.
4lIVERSIN. CA I~501
RE; Parcel Map 23335; Being situated in the unincorporated
territory of the County of Riverside, State of California,
and being portions of Lots lZ4, 118, 139, 141 and 142
together vzth portions of Lincoln Avenue, Jackson Avenue and
Monroe Avenue and adjoining said lots. All as shown on ma'
of the Temecula Land and Water Company on file in Book 8,
Page 359 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, California.
(18 Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map
No. 23335 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prindts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with DXv. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California, when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Two
Attn: Gloria Maciel
April 29, 1988
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and-
water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in Parcel.
Map 23335 is in accordance with the water system.
expansion plans of the Rancho California Water-.
District
and that the water service.storage and
distribution system will be .dequate to provide:wateri'7:-.';~
service to such parcel. This certification does"not.~;
constitute a guarantee that it will supply
such parcel at any specific quantities. flows or. - -.~-
pressures for fire protection or any other purpose"..:?:.,
This certification shall be sig.ed by
official Of the water company. Tl3_~_D~iD!_W~j~_b~ ."
submitted to the CountX SurveXor's Office to Eeview'at~;~;~';;~.i'.k
........................... ':' -,: ?.
'This Department has a statement from the Rancho'Cal'iforn~a':}';:i=~'~;j.i
Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing :';;~".':!
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed
subdivider. It will be necessary for the
arrangements to be made prior to the recordation"of.,'the
This Department has a statement from the Eastern
Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the District,.,:The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans'and
specifications as approved by the District. the-County'=..'w-'='
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the.'
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted'in triplicate.""
along with the original drawing. to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter.'location of.--"
manholes, complete profiles. pipe and ~oint specifications-"~:'
and the size of the sewers at the ~unction of the new-system""
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the~ :..~
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signedby'.~, · ....
registered engineer and the sewer district with the ~ .
following certification: "I certify that the"design'.of the
sewer system in Parcel Map 23335 is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water
· District and that the waste disposal system is adequate'at
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed.
parcel."
Sincer ly,
Sanitarian
Environmental Health Services
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Three
ATTN: Gloria Maciel
April 29, 1988
·-"- I~.
The plans must be submitted to the County. Surveyor°s 'Ottic~?;...
to review at least two weeks R_r_ior__to_the_ £ec~uest for the,~.:~:
It will be necessary tot financial arrangements to be'made',,
prior to the recordation ot the final map,
· !,-, ;.,~..-~ ,: - ... :-.%;.~;, ~i~~ .... ·
~ · ,
SM:tac
KE~INETH I... EDWAFIDS
CHIEF' EN~INEE]I
Riverside County
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. 1
Gloria Maciel
~adies and Gentlemen:
RIVERIIDE. CALIFORNIAIIIQI
aune 22, 1988
Re:
Parcel Map 23335 ~'.
This is a proposal to divide about 10 acres into several commercial'
lots in the Santa Gertrudis Valley area. The site is along
north side of Winchester Road about 1000 feet east of. Znterstate]'~/~"
15 "~'.'-'
· . . · ''
,- .:.. . ~.I.!~+.~ ....
Our. review indicates that the entire property is within the;-100
year flood plain caused by Santa Gertrudis Creek which traverses
the north ~ortion of the site with an estimated 100 year flow rate
of 11,300 cfs, The applicant proposes to channelize Santa.
Gertrudis Creek by installing hardened slope protection along both
banks to protect this development, This reach of Santa Gertrudis
Creek is a ~ortion of the Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan ...
facilities, and Will be operated and maintained by the District if
the proposed improvements of Santa Gertrudis Creek is constructed~,
to District's standards, ~o indication was made on the site 91an
how to collect the flows into the proposed channeliand how to pro-.
tect th, lot, along ,argarita Road. "' :+"= :
Following are the District's recommendations: ~ !'~
1. This parcel map is located within the limits of. the'-
Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan
for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. "-
Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth under the provi-
sions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of
Area Drainage Plans", amended February 16,..1988s ;~ .~..,..
a, Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner:as:'
part of the filing for record of the subdivision final .
map or parcel map, or if the recording.of'a'final
cel map is waived, drainage fees.shall be ~aid as
condition of the waiver prior to recording=a~certifi-:./.:
cats of compliance evidencing the waiver of.the'parcel~'~-
map~ or : :;?~ .'.'.~i!~~'~' : .=,
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 23335
'Amended Map No. i
-2- '~',]]iz'June~22,~ 1988
.
,.
b. At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-:
quired affidavit requesting ale ferment of the ~yment of
fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Building
Director at the time of issuance of a grading ~rmit or
building permit for each approved ~rcel, whichever may
be first obtained after the recording of the subdivi-
sion final map or parcel map; provided however,'~ this ,~
option to defer the fees may not be-exercised for
parcel where grading or structures have been initiated
on the ~rcel within the prior 3 year period, 'or per-
mits for either activity have been issued on that ,par-
cel which remain active. , .~t'-L-' a ,..'~?~::?.~ ~: ~' -
. ,,,.,
Prior to initiation of the final construction:'drawings'for']'.?'
those facilities required to be built as ~rt'of the ..'
Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley ~ea Drainage Plan,'~.~,:j=~':
the developer should contact the Riverside County Flo~
Control and Water Conservation District to' ascertain'i the~;
terms ~nd conditions of design, construction,'~inspection,=j~7_'~'.-~
transfer of rights of way, project credit in-lieu'of:~-fees"-~]~
and reimbursement schedules which may=~apply.'='.~'~.Title~reports
and title insurance must be provided for all right .of' way.
to be transferred to the District.. ~e~ developer-' should
note that if the estimated cost for required areasdrainage
plan facilities exceeds the required d[ainage fees and the
developer wishes to receive credit' for 'reimbursement' in
excess of his fees, the facilities will ~ constructed as a
public works contract. Scheduling for 'construction of
these facilities will be at the discretion of ~he,District.
Hardened slope protection should be installed='along'bth
banks of Santa Gertrudis Creek to DistrAct standard..
slo~ protection should extend from the top of slope %o a
~int below flow line based on design flow velocities~~ ~e
protection should be tied into the existing crossing.under.'=
~e pro~sed channel invert'should ~ designed as close as
~ssible to the existing natural channel's slo~ and rela-~
rive invert elevations. , ':;/.'t.;? T-'f;j>(:','/. '71~j, ],sT~-~'' ='
~rangement should ~ made to channelize the flows upstre~
of Margarita Road into the pro~sed channel to protect
those lots along Margarita Road~ otherwise, appropriate. ':: ',
flo~proofing measures should be provided for all the
buildings on the lots which are affected by the tributary.'..
flows. ~y blocking of the tributary flows or significant-
ly raising of the upstream water surface caused bye. the
development is not allowed. " ""' '~'. {',",lu
,.
.
-'... '.,.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 23335
Amended Map No. 1
-3-
A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and
may affect "waters of the United States", "wetlands" or
"jurisdictional streambeds", therefore, in accordance with~I
the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program
and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts.59 .through 73)and
County Ordinance No. 458, ~ .'~-"~ I... i.~ ~,~ .
a. A flood study consisting of HEC-2 calculations, cross
sections, maps and other data should,be prepared to the"
satisfaction of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FE~) and the District for the purpose of revising the
effective Flood Insurance Rate Map of the'project site.
The submittal of the study should be concurrent.with
the initial submittal of the related, project..~x~5,-~7
improvement plans and final District,approval will"not"ij~
be given until a Conditional Letter'of
(CLOMR) has been received from FEMA.',' ~ ~'~'~.. '~,.~jr=~-.~
b. A ~opy of appropriate correspondencesand 'neCesSary'~~3~i!~I~,~
permits from those government agencies fromwhich,"C',=~=?~,='/
approval is required by Federal or State law (such as
Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department~of Fish and
Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to %he District
prior to the final District approval"of the~project.
Where flows are collected or conveyed offsite, or where
offsite construction is required for these purposes,.re-
corded drainage easements should be secured from the af-
fected property owners. Copies of these easements should
be submitted to the District priorto recordation of the
final map. If easements are not obtained, hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted for District review which
show that no adverse impacts, such as backwater'ponding'
will result from the proposed improvements. This is par-
ticularly important in reference to Santa GertrudisCreek
and any impacts the proposed improvements might have upon
Winchester Road. .
Lots abutting the proposed channel should be ate'least 1
foot above the 100 year storm water surface elevation.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside'of'road right of
way should be contained within drainage easements 'shown on
the final map. A note should be added to the final map
stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of build-
ings and obstructions"· '. ".~
Riverside County -4- ' '."~!.June"222'~19i38'Z=.'
Re= Parcel Map 23335
10, Offsite drainage facilities should be located within".].~ ~
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected pro~rty o~ers. ~e dockants should be recorded
and a copy submitted to the District prior to' recordation.
11. ~e property's street and lot grading should be designed
a manner that ~r~tuates the existing natural'. drainage
~tterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet
~ints and outlet conditions, otherwise,:'a drainage ease-
ment should be obtained from the affected property o~ers'
for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows. A-
copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted
to the District for review prior to.the recordation~-of the~Y
12, ~e~porary e~osion control ~easures s~ould ~e ;i~ple~en~ed'~'~
i~edia~ely following roug~ grading ~o preven~'deposi~ion-~'i?2
R copy of i,prove,en p ans,.'graeing ph'nS]:ana .final
~ap along wi~ supporting ~ydrologie an~ ~ydr~ulic 'calcula-.
Depa~en~ fo~ review and approval prior ~o ~ecorda~ion of
~he final map, ~rading plans s~ould ~e.,app~Ove~ prlor ~o
Questions concerning ~is ma~ter may be referred ~o Robert
....
ccz RBF & Associates
RCzbab
cpm23335
TO:
ATTN:
PLJkHNING DEPARTHENT
TEAH ls GLORZAHACZEL
FH 23335 - AHEHDED I1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ~I. ~ ,~
IN COOPERATION WITH THE ** l, , ,,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY,
~RE CHIEF **: ~ ....
' ~ '~ .',~:' Planning & ~lineerlnl ~ice
6-13-88 ': .' :. ~: ~,'. 4~ ~on ~reet, ~lte II
" "..,~ ~veni~, CA 91501
, - ~ - "' :' , ' ' (714) 787~
.~
,,::
Vlth respect to the conditions of approve1 for the 'above referenced lend division,
the Flre Department recommends the fellsring fire protection measures be provlded
In accordance vlth RIverside County Ordinances end/or recognized,, flre protection.:,
~e rarer malne shall be capable oE providing ~ potential Etre Elov oE 5000 G~H
and an actual [lr~ [lov available from any one hydrant ebB11 be 2500
hours duration a~ 20 FSZ residual operating pressure. ,*.~. ~.~:,~,.; ~.,.:'.
Approved super [lre hydrants, (6"x4"x2-2t") shall be loca~ed aC each e~ree~
Intersection end spaced not more than 330 feet apar~ in any dtrecC~on, ~vt~h
no porclon el any loc frontage more than 165 ~eeC ~om ~Etre h~dranc. ~,:~' ~ ~.-
:,,~,,~-.
~e applicant/developer shall provide vrttten certification Era the appropriate
va~er company chac ~he requlred Etre hydrants are elfher existInfer
~lnanclal arrangements have been made Co provide them.
Applicant/developer shall Eurnleh one copy oE the va~e~
Flre Departmen~ ~or revtev. Flame shall conSea to Elge hydrant types, location
and epaclng, end, ~he system shall mee~ the ~tre Elov requirements. Flame shall'.'*
be elgned/approved by · regte~ered clvll engineer and the loc~1 va~er company
vlth the ~o11~tng certification: *'Z cerClEy that the deelSn o~ the rarer system.
le ~n accordance vl~h the requt~emenCe pzeeczlbed by
The required rarer system including fire hydrants shall be installed and'accepted
by the appropriate rarer agency prior to any combustible:building material being-'
t
placed on an individual loC. ': ~,'.~'~,';,*./- -.,*~'~.~, ~*-~' ~-~-'
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shell be referred to the ' '
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. "'-'.i:"! ',',..'} ' '~!~!~;:'~.,;',..~,-~',~- '-~'~"~*
, , ,
Chief Fire Department Planner
George Tatus, DepUty FIrm ~rshal
-.
#
Grading - Building and Safety
It'ading's original come~ts renain q~plicable to this case.
Oepar tment of Bui lding and Safety:" "~2~:~:':;[':::
i, Prior to commencin~ any grtdin~ exceedin~.9~ cubic~yirds,'.T~-
the owner. of that property shall obtain a grading.'~'--jperm. i~:;5::
from the Department of Building a~ Safety '~:~/"~.. ~ .'~l
___b, Prior ~o tpprov~l of thim u$~/$ubd~vi$ion':j,t..'griding ~-.
plrmi t lnd tpprovtl of the rough ~ ~rlding .= mhtl I .. be "::':'
~. .... ~ ..~obLained from the Building and Safety.Oepartment,':l~""~";..-'
c, Prior to issuance of any building permit, · the 2~:" property
oNner shall obtain a grading permit'~ and approyal to'
construct from the Bui lding and Safety_. Department ,~1~
___d, Constructing a road, where greater thanSi :cubic~j'yards
· of materail is pliced or moved, ~. rwquirem ~ "grading
The following 'X ' marked comments pertain
1.
2.
..;! ,: ~;, ~..: :; ..~{:j ;,., ~0:.'~ ,..~-~:v
COUNTY O~ ~ I V~ I D~
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY., ?"'~1{~'C.?~7~; ;~ "'r:'
' ~: INITIAL: ~
. , ,L~', . . ,, ~ '~f
~ ~ ....
Refer to the attached standard vesting tract. comments.
The information submitted is too vague' for specific
. .. :...'>.,> ::.: --,
Please refer k~ departmental forms ~B~-~&~'
e&~ ~ ~B~-l~ when preparing t grading plan.?,..' ~;~.':~'.'.;'
In order ko permit your grading plln~ . khe/,:follo. ing" ...
......
b. Provide 3 cDpke~ of PreliminarySoil~ Report ~ .. .,,
c. Provide 1 copy of each of the hydrolagy~;t~. hydraulic
revie, m standard improvement plan~ and ." .
Provide clearances from the following department
_.~___Planning .! ';'.Y.: .... "'>~
~_. Flood Control - " .Y ::, , ~.;:;'
e. Provide copy of Planning Department :: conditions of"..~
approval for the approved or:':. tentativej., ~.pproved,
case. . ". :'~,::~!:~'..:,:'.. .1,~; .-- -,.:..:.~-~
f. Provide an erosion control .;.,.plan. prepared '2, by
I i tensed. I andscape arch i tect ' ' '-:.' ;~, ~.,-t, i~ .,, ~;~2' :: :.
Provide a conceptual grading plan. ' .:'j :.'.f~>{,';-', ':":
Observe slope setbacks from permit" areas ~: and/or
structures per section ~BIE and figure E9~1: of;: the
Uniform Building CQde as modified by:Ordinance qb?-*-
.. . ',>~;:.~ ,~;.'-.>, ',;: ..:., =:~J~-j ,~.:.'~-..
Driveway grades shall be 15~ or less. /.t: :-->~: :..;~,24~'2
~" "';' .... ' '.";~: :::'.i~ ~':"',' V
Uhen obtaining a plan revie~ permitw~.~ubmi.~'5 copies
grading plan to Building and Safe~y~for:':./:dist~ibution
· ' .. .. ' ::':;!AT'>~" ', ?' ,~:, ';..
Sho~ street and pad elevations.. lnlure' ~hak'a. 1~
can be maintained from back of p~d to street. ~.' :
, , .. - F:" ..~ '
...- j.:'.,. -:,. ~ .. .-< ..
,
10.
X 11.
14.
15.
16.
IB.
17.
Design V-ditches at .tOp of slopes to handle ,~ the
year storm flow. - . . "j,,~,2'~-:'.;' ..~.~{::' ,:~'..~i-
·
·
Provide (1) one copy of the hydrologic/hydr~aulic
.. ..:- >% - ! ·
and drawings. ,. *"" ,
Provide recorded drainage easements for ' ~he. proposed
lot ~o lo~ drainage. :
Sho. ~he QI6 and D166 flo.s a~ ~he inle~ and ou~le~
all properties and a~ all drainage s~ruc~ure, inlets
,
Provide building footprints on lo~s.'.~T~~ .'.,. .,-
.
This proper~y is located i~ ~..the" Rancho California
Potential ~ubsidence area. Per Board' Resolution
addi ~ional geo~echnical information is required. ;~,~.~'-~:..
]~c]uding ~he asphal~ic concrete. base ma~eria]. .... and :' ',
eBr~h moved ~his projec~ Hill exceed, 56 cubic~ya~ds.~,:~
Design each lot to drain separately.":,:-Do not u~e cnmmon"
_
Projects having an imbalance bet-men the cut~. and > fill~. '.
shall specify the location of their":import'~o~:: exportS.':
Sho. slopes. i.cludi-9 terraces, .to scale. ;~'~;~L-~:~;':,L~T;~
Proposed off-site 9fading
notarized permission from the affected propeCty, o.ner.-.
No obstruction or diversion of nltur&l -2NateF,:::couFses;L.
shall be permitted. ' ' ':~;*:;l~':' >~ :L: .:: <'~{'
Provide ~opography beyond permi~ area. especial ]y
adjacen~ proper~y is developed or being develop~d..~;:';~---'
Slope heigh~ may affec~ adjBcen~ proper~ies.~>*.: ":'~)'?<'
. . . - ~.,~., ,, -?.; ~ ',~T,'~
On flag ]o~s she. the location, 9rede.~cu~:~~
scale ~ha~ ~i ] I be required to cons~ruc~ >~the '~drive ,.,... '
. ~; :" .~-- ~. , ...,.:~,;-.; .'t . .
' ;:. , '... -, .' ::: ... ~:'t{~. ~,~.,~.:.
~ ,
. ~'.~ ,,' .,.. -.<~.. :., ~. ~. .:~,'/,'; .,,:, :
'. ~ - ,
.'., .' ',' ~-'. ;~-'~ '.' .~.'j, "~,'..v~ .,'
· ~ , ~. .;. .,'~.., .~ . ,:' ,;',.
, , ,,,,,zE ..
DATE: March 9, 1988
TO:
Assessor
Butldtng and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Dude.
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
LAFC0, S Patslay
U,S, Postal Service - Ruth E, Davidson
Rancho Caltf, Water
Southern Caltf, Edison.
Southern Caltf, Gas
General Telephone
Mr. Palomar
Sierra Club
Nurrieta Chamber of Commerce
Calif, Native PlaOt Society
Comtsstoner Bresson
:IiVE:DiDE count.u
-pLAnnin DEPA:I nlEP-
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ' "~'::.~-' '
PLANNING DEPARTMENT '.~.
"PALQMAR OBSEi~:.%TORY:
C~ERCI~ PARCEL'~ Z3335/CH~GE OF
ZONE 5163 -: (Tin-l) ~ Rancho California
Develo~nt Cmpany - Robert
, Milltam Frost and Associates - Nurrteta
Area -Ftrst Supervlsorlal D1strtct -
North of Junction o~ Mtnchester Road and
Ynez Road - R-R Zone"- 48.7 acres -
Proposal to su~1vtde 3 parcels into
cmrdal, lots - (REQUEST Zone Char
frm R-R 'to C-l/C-P) - Hod 119.- A.P.
910-110-029,31; 911-180-018
Please revteq the case described above, along Nith the attached case map."~'A Land
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for May 12,-1988. If it clears,
Your comments and recommendations are requested prtor to Apt11 28.,1988 in order..that we
may tnclude thm tn the staff report for thts particular. case..- - ::...:., ,,. · -..
Should you have any questions regarding thts ttm, please'do not hasttare to contact
- ..,:,. .
.: ~,: ....
DATE:; I e 1~6 SIGNATURE PasadePs, ~tH~nia 91125
.:. ; .
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR : 4&209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 ., INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(7!4) 787-6181 , - (619) 342-8277
~though the proposed project ~s more than 30 m~les f:m Pal~ar
~e request that any outdoor lighting confo~ to the follo~n~ g~delines ~
vhiah are fo~ulated to minimize the adverse effects o~..ligh~ pOllution:,~ "
2, Orient nd shield light to prevent direct upward ill~ination," .~;Z..~.; .. '.
applications, the ~sociated business is open past that time, in which
~. Use lov-pressure sodi~ l~ps for roadrays, val~ays',: equipment yards,-"'.
Adoption of th~ae guidelines ~ill h~lp preserve th~ eonattton, n~d~d for .
th~ continuation of r~$earch ~t P~lomar Oba~rv~tory.: For further
\
Letghton and Associates
27715 Jefferson Avenue. Sutte 109
Rbncho California. CA 92390
Attention: Nr. DanJel Chu
Hr. Hark Bergnenn
Gentlemen:
..... !*~.: .., ' ....
RiVER3iDE COUn;,u
PLanninG "DEP RaTIER;-,
· . *,: ,. ~..~'~-..:,:,.~..:
,. ..,,.~, ,
.
'.,
-.
-.
_-
,~. ,.-~ * -..~, ~,~ . ~
SUBJECT: LIquefaction Hazard
ProJect No. 11880600-01
Tentative Parcel Nap 23335
County ~ologlc Report-No.
Rancho California
~ . ~
~ .-, ...... .
He have revtewed your report enttt]ed 'Preliminary Geotechntcal Evaluation of
LIquefaction Potential ~.. Lots 1 *through 18, Ntnchester Neadows. Tentattve..Tract
Nap No. 23335, Northeast corner of ~ltnchester and Ynez'~'Roads, Rancho
California, Rtvers~.de County, CA,' dated Ha~ 1, 1988,/~d ~our response'~etter
dated June 30, 19~ ~; .. ~ ~, .... ' ~,::: ~ :~ .~..."~ .: -' ' ' -
" ..... . r '.:: .
Your report detemtned thqt't~e potenttal"for 11'u~faC~l~n'extsts on the stte ",.'.:,
for an earthquake of 6..~*~,ghttudd~a ~M~bhfb?'.*ground',acceleratton of 0.41g... '.
The factor of safety ag&~n~**14~efact4on 'ts* 'tess-.~a~for a la~er of sotl
rangtng tn dep~ of 10 tb 20 feet belw the extsttng ground surface. '. ~.~
Your report reckended that ~n .~rder,to ,duce the liquefaction potential. one
of the following alternatives should.be foll~ed: +'~ "
throughout the propos~ d
~tl tn~ and tmprove~nt area to 'Increase the
overburden pressure. The ;J~l;~Yn:g 7, feet of compacted fill;on Lots
through 5 wtll provtde the additional masures to, m$tlgate?':' ~-:',"' ':-" .... ~:
locat~ wtthfn Lots 6 though 18 should h underlain by::at least 10 ';-' ~'-.*
feet of cmpacted fl11.. ~e flll blanket sh~ld utend'lO feet beyond
2. Rmval of approxtmtely 15 feet to 20 feet of alluvial'deposits and.
replac~ and recmpact~ to at least 90 perCent~?~.:?~elatt~e.~C~pactton ~',~...
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
,,-~, INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Letghton and Associates
3. Denstftcatton of the upper 20-foot subsurface cohesionless matertal to
at least 92 percent relattve compactton as determined by ASTN:D:~557-78.'
by vtbroflotatton dynamic compaction. or other techniques.
4. Utilizing post-tenstoned slabs for the proposed structures. Thts.
measure wtll not mitigate liquefaction potenttal~ however. if
liquefaction should occur and tt is not too severe. post-tenstoned
slabs should help keep the butldtng intact..,' ~;~. ~ ,,-~
it is our optnton that the report was prepared tn a competent manner and '
satisfies the additional Information requested under the California
Environmental Qualtty Act revie~ and the Riverside County Comprehensive General
F a
Me recommend that the following note be placed on the tn 1 ~p prior to its
recordatton. 'County Geologtc Report No. 509 was prepared for this property
Flay ~. Z988 by Leighton and Associates. and is on ftle at the Riverside County-,.~'
Planning Department. The spectftc items of interest arealiquefaction and.-,,-~;'
The recon,nendations made tn your report for m t ' ':'' ' ..... '
potential shall be adhered to in the destgn and construction of.this.proJect.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTlqENT
Robert B. Keeble
Nom Lostbom -Butldtng & Safety (2)'
Planning Team ! - Gloria Hadel
GIN. IrORt4 &' !llsJ
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND ';~'~;
WATE~ CONSERVATION DISTRICT ~;'; .' ~'~..'~:~;~;~;'~'~"'~;::.:'
County Administrative Center
g~verstde. Ca1 tfornia - ..
KENNETH I_ EDWARDS
~Nl~r ENQINELq
Attention: Regional Team No. I
Area: S~.~.. &er~r,dL~ V~lley
Re: (:::t'1,~'93e 'T
~e have reviewed this case and have the following comments: .
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions:of the
· property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.--
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause somedamage.::! New construc-'
tio, should comply with all applicable ordinances..::.' .-:
V'
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area.' outside?of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses' should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the 'natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet'stating, 'All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobt 1 e home supports. ' :~,::~.::!..~! .,.'- :.:.' ~. :~. '::;.
This project is in the "';':' ~'; ";~: Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance.with the..applicable rGles and
The proposed zoning 'is consistent with existing flood hazards.' Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop' to the
Thq Dtstrtct's report dated ts still ~current'for this..project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change. ,;~i.;:.: .' {;~.'. '~; ....
The attached coments apply. .~-~;~;:..
cc: R/ F A Ass, c;^tej
Rc..
Board of Directors:
Richard D. Steffey
Frmident
James A. Dsrby
Sr. Vic~ President
Ralph Daily
Dou8 Kulberg
Jon A. Lundln
Jeffrey L. Minkler
T. C. Rowe
Officers:
Stsn T. Milk
General Msna~er
Phi!lip L. Forbes
Disctot of Finsnc~ -
Norman L. Thomas
Disctot of EnginerinK '
Tbomss R. McAJiest~r
Director of Operations
& Maint~n~nc~
Barbara J. Reed
Director of Acbn~nletrstion ·
District Sm~mry
Rutan sad Tucker
, . .. . . :.~' ~::..''., .'[ -. :~ ,. - .~ ,.
'.., - ,.._
4080 ~m~ S~ee~ ~h F~ ,--"'~ .....:-"'.'~ ~'..'.'~'~"-~'~:'.
Riverside, California 92501-3657 ;: . " ' "
.
S~ject: Water Avall~ility' ~ ..~.:~:q.~ -~ ,:
Reference: Commercial Parcel Map 23335.~
~ange of Zone 5163," "~
w~u~ be ava~ab~ u~n ~m~~n "~
If R~D can be of further seaice .to'you,'::=please''
contact this office, . ~:,~' :~ '-:'~-".--,' :~' -.' - -'
~ ~ , - .... ~,-..; .~ .~-../~ ,-
Ve~ tnly ]Fours, ): :;' :'-~:
~CHO ~LIFO~IA WATER ,, DIS~I~ ~> '-
Engineering -Se~ices' Representative-
:;n. :-+ ::. :' :,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WAT. ER DISTRICT
28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390-0174 · (714) 676-4101 · FAX (714) 676-0615
#2o/eg
Lm~dCommd
D~ o/Sorebin ~d#ormm
Do/bF.
RIverside Co. P]anntng De~t.
4080 Lemon st., 9th Floor
rt
SUBJECT: PARCEL leAP 23335 - ZONE CHANGE 5163 ' "?:: ' -: ~-:;:': ""' ' '. ': .'
:' ' j"" ' ' ' . I:~'; : : '::
The Dtstrtct is responding to your request for co,~nents~ on' the subject
project(s) relattve to the provision of water and sewer service..~'The. t.tems
checked below apply to this project review. ,!':.:.~:~:'-i~': .: ....
The subject project: :':'~:';:
x Is not wtthtn EH~'s: .,
~ water service area '), =~,;-:: ,:-
Se~r servtce area '
Hust be annexed to thts Dtstrtct's Zmprove~nt Dtstrtct No. tn order
to be e]tgtb]e to receive domsttc water/santtary'se~r serve. ~-
~ ' ,~ , ,.,
~tl1 be requtred to construct the following faC!ltttes tf to'be served
a. ) Mater Servtce ~:..~.'.,':.:.~,'
..,..... , ,, '..:'.?, .~ "..-;-
-,,
b Se~r Servtce ',,->. ':
· - :.,- .: ,' ', .
Any and a]] necessary reg~ona]]y s~zed onstte and offs~te gravity sewers and:'
appurtenant works that might ~nc]Ude monitoring ~nho]es, ]tft' stations, force
mtns, and effluent d~sposa]/use. Sewers ~t]] not:' be
]tnes/prtvate ]and. Fee participation tn regtona] ~se~rs, 'treat~nt, and';
effluent dtsposa] must be ~t.-0n]y wastes acceptab]e to E~.-regu]attons
wt11 be allowed. A 15" sewer extsts tn Ntnchester. Rd~;.~.?~:~::~'~:~:::~:62::'~ ~L-..::.:
2N5 S. San JKiato Strm · Pint Offke ~x 85~ · ~nJKinto, Qiiforn~ 92585-t5~ · Te~p~ (714) 925-7676
I~ust provtde adequate rights-of-way. The -. proponent
Will be required to use reclal~d water tn the greenbelt areas.~ ~,:.
Is within the Assess~nt District. 'Conditions 'must be
included that the tract cannot be recorded untt) the assess~nt has been
paid tn full or an a~ended assess~nt district=has been recorded..',' ..:.'_
Requires major roster planning and the Dtstrtct cannot count untt.1
the mster plan ts c~pleted.
Can be provfded w~th water service s~nce the D~str~ct hashexisting water
fac~}tt~es ~n the area. (does not consider f~re flow)~:~:~<' ~ '
Can be provided w~th sewer service since the D~str~ct has adequate se~r
above counts are subject to rev~ston dur~ng:subm~tta]-'of-tracts~for
Shou]d you have questions on any of the above
RiVERSiDE COUnt,
PLAnnine DEPAR[ITIE C
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
'.
=C.AN~E OF ZONE ~O. ~~ a Pueuc USE
D CONDITIONALUSE a T~CTMAPNO.
PERMIT NO. D ~M~RY USE PERMITNO.
~ PARCEL MAP NO. a VARIANCE NO. '
D PLOT PLAN NO. : ?.
..,- ,
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCE~D, .
~ APPLICANT INFORMATION
1. Appliclnt'l Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephorte No.:
2. Chvnefl Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone No,:
3. Representative:
MIlling AddresS:
Telephone N~:
Rancho California Development Company
straP' Box 755. Rancho California, CA 92390'
City ITATE
, ,
( 714 ) 676-5641 (8am.-Sp.m.)
Ka~se~ Development Company '~ :: ....
~.O. BoX 755~ ~ancho Cal~fo~n~a/"CA 92390
- ~-' Attns f' Ro~:t ~embZe
,.,,
Robe:t ae~n, ~11~am ~=ost an~ Associates
NOTE: If more than one person is involved In Ihe ownership Of the property being developed e separate pa;e m us: be
attached to this application which flail the nlrnes and addresses of e~ personl having a.n interest.in t~e ownersre; Gf
the properly. ;.: · :~, '. '!. ,::, .'~; ~!:'~-~...:, j~ :.',-/ .... ~ '
B. PROJECT INFORMATION . '~'~':':'! .'-" :'::,~'i'-:-~:~2~? . ~. ,~:~k.~!'!:;!" '- .'
1. Purpose Of Request (describe project): (Ordinance 348 ref. no.) '
Approval o~ Change o~ ~-one ~o~ Tentative Parcel Nap No.23335 from
R-R to C-1/C-P consistent with the Ranc. hq Villages Community Policy
- · ·
Plan · - -'*' ,' ~
2. Rallied cases filed tn ConjunCtion wllh this rlquest: ~' '
tentative Parcar Nap No. 23335 : :'::~':" :'!' :~, ~'~- !'. ;* * . '.; ·
c.. P.oPE.~ ,.FO.MAT.O. ,.: :-::' ': ~: .' :' !~. I.(4~ ~'//"/~. :'*T." ~* '~'
· 01
I. AllesaoflPercelNo(s). 910-110-029, 910-110-031, afi~;~qt~4t~, 911-180- 8
· .: ** ;.
2. Generillocalion(streetmddress. etc.) North of WInchester' ]toad
. Ynes ]toad and West ot NazcJartta ]toad '--:-,'
3, Seclio~ femecula Rancho Township 7S Range 3W
· ; , =; ;., .: .... ; ji:; . · ~" ......
4. Approximate Gross Acreage: 48.7 Acres /':~:"' ~ 9 =. {'
.~ Legll descriplio, (give exact legll descdplk)n as rlc~wded in the Office o~ the County Recorder). May be attached.
· ,! ,.
See Attaclunent A ..~
: . - , ,
6. Thomas 8rOthers Page No. end Coordinltel D6 iS, ~-6
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT _ ~ , - - DAT
nil glimmek · '~ .: ·
..... -:!: ~... ~ :- :~-.
' EMON STREET, 9~ FLOOR
;IDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
,1-6181
i~ .
~, ' ~. 4~209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
~ E.A. NO,
, LZ STAFF USE ONLY, .- ~ ' ,-
. ENWRONMENTAI, INFORMATION FORM · '.-.~ ..'~
.. ,. ..., . ,
Please complete Parts I and II of this form and provide III of the eddltlonll materials reQuesled In Part IlL Failure to do ao may
delay the review end process of your Proloot. If you are unable to ~ovlde the I~fgrmatlon, or you need!nielance, ptea.~e feel
free to contact the Planning Department at (714) 787-6418. i ~: ''~'~'' ' TM :'~ '~ ;' ' '
1. What ~S the TOtal Acreage involved? Z * k 4 8.7
2. Is there a Drevious aD~lication filed for the Same lite? YE$~ NOD "~i'~'~, ;~[ ~
If '*Yes." Crowds Case Numl~er. AlSO provide the Environmentll Asialament Numl~er, If known, and Environmental Impact
CASE NO _Ranche V~.l].a;eR (Plrcel Mep`ZoneChlnge, atc.). ~:~':* .~ ' :!! .,.: ,'- :"
3.' Additionli comments you ely wish to supply reglrdlng your project. {AttaCh In additional sheet ~ n,ecelsary.)
'. ,
1. Is the ProjeCt within an AIQuilt-PriolO SpeOlll Studies Zone? YES O ' NO C}C :';~'/'~:,* ':;~ :!: ' ,' '
"To determine If your Oroject ia locited In I Special Sludlel Zone, contact the Public InfOrmation Section, or refer to the
Special Study Zones Maps availIbis at the Public Information Counter of the Planning Deportment. If the project Is w~thin
zone refer to Ordinance 547.1. or discuss the altultlon with the County Geologist... :/-' , :.:. ~ ', ~ '~: '
· ~; a fa,':t hazard reDart iS neCeSsary, combIota the Inveatlgltlon prior tO lubmltting your IDpliCltion and provide 6 copies of
the re:art with this form· If a waiver of the requiresanti le granted, lubmlt · copy of the wltver with thtl form. '~-
2. Is ?e :rCiect Iocate'~ within a hizlrd managemeN zone Or liquitaCtiOn Irll II Illown on aIDs Of the "Seismic Safety Ele-
': "e :e-,-:,i r- e it yo'.Jr: rcje:t is subject to the geologic hlzlrda noted above you should consult the "Seismic Sltaty & SafeW
E 'a '~e-~ Technical Ret~cd" which il ivaillble It the PulNic Intermition Counter of the PIInning Department ~ -~;.: '
,' !~e a-sv.,er to =ues:i:,~ =2 il "Yes," contact 1he Ipproprilte Geographic PIInning Telm Section to discuss IDC:r0Driate
~,,.=.as ;: re to ~ ~nimize t he hazard· IncOrpOrate iny mltigltiOn mellurel into the prOjeCt design prior tO sul}mltttng the
t,cn :. r inClcate it. the sDa:e provided below the reSultl Of your dl$cullionl with the PIIr~ning Tale...::' , ,. ~ ;- . ~
3. Ifyourprojectisinthedesedare&illtwllhlnlbloweandhlzardarel?. YESrn '. NOIR 'j'~'~ .~ ' "-
The P:anning Offices in India and RIverSide wilt provide you with infOrmltiOn Concarning blowsand hlzards,You may
wish to contact the U.S. Soil ConaerjItion Service. · "' '*.; '* , '~ . ·
If yc" r ProjeCt is subject to blowlind hlzlrdl. lubmit a blowsand control piln wilh the ippllc~.*tion. (Alia refer to Section 14.1
of Ordinlnce d60, if your prOjeCt IIa percol map Or lubdlvlllon). ' · · .~ :'. · '~...
4. Is water service available It the project lira? YES C[ NO O . ~..,. ., ~.~:, ,; . :-'. . ~,~ '*
If "NO.' how fir must the water line(I) be extended to provide letvice? : · · . · ' '
Number Of feet Or miles
5. Is sewer service available at the site? YES 13 NO rn ~'- ,. -. ~ · ,' .': . ,
I! 'r~c." hgw far must the water line(s) be extended to provide lervlce?-,;':~ - ,~, . , -*., :';:,','~i
r<u.-.ber of feet or miles
6. AdditionllCommente: Thj. i r-n,;;.t. aronmental' ZnfotmatJ. on l:0irm:Ls subm$tted ~$r.h r. he
Request.'~oir Appzova.1..o~ .tentative Z~atcel He;> No. 23335 and Zone Change,
' (R-R to C-,V.C-I=) cons.tetent ~w~.th the Rancho V.tlZeges Com~nuntt:y l~oZ.tcy
l=Zan.. ~he project has been ei~chressed :Ln the env:Ltonmental clocumenr. a=.~on
prepared previously .~ot' the Ranabe V:LZZagee }'o].tcy l=1an Aires.
1 :. At least three (3) panOrlmiC DhOtOgrlphl (COlOr I}dnta) of the ixoJect mite, Or in lertN PhOtO Of the Iltl. If color phologrlphl
· Ire utilized, include I mID identifying: . · -"- - ·
h. The area Of coverage Of each phOIOgraph ..- , "~'i"~' ~ ;' ·.,
2. A clear Photocopy (XerOx Or similar COpy) Of the IpprOpriSta podIOn Of the U..S. Qeologlcll Survey Quidtingle map, delin-
eating lhe bounder,el of the project fits. Alia note the title Of the map, . · ,.. ;.- , ..-, . .; .. , k.
I cert,fy ;.".at I have investigated the QueStions in Parts IInd II and the inlwera ere true Ind correct to the best o~ my
knowledge. ' TM
..-%
m- m:onl ( :'Can
. RiVERbiDE COUn;,v
pLAnning3 DEPaR I IErlE
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ':-~'-:-
O CONDITIONAL USE O T~CT MAP NO. ' ....
PERMIT NO. O ~M~RY USE PERMIT NO~~
~PARCELMAPNO. 2~1~ O VARIANCENO. .~.~' *. ~ ... -'
~ PLOT P~N NO. · · .
· APR I4 1988
., -,, .
': ' ~" RIVERSIDE COUN~
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCE~D. ~ ~., . . ,~ :,
..... ,~ "3/ ' '/:", ~NNING DEPARTMENT
A APPLICANT INFORMATION . 9~,
1, AODliclnVsName; Rancho California Development Company
MailingA~re~: s,~, BoX 755, Rancho CalitotDia, CA 92390
2. ~nefsName: gatse: Development Company ' '~=~-";'~ '
_
MailingA~dresS: P.O. ~OX 755, ~ancho Calt~o:nia, CA 92390
Telephone No.: ( 714 ) 676-5641; (81~-llm.) .= ........ ~,'
3. ReDresenlalive: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
NOTE: It more then ~ ~on i in~lved In t~ ~emhlp ~ t~ pro~dy ~ing ~eveloped I separate Dagr-"~r be
attached to this Ippliutl~ ~lch IIItl the ~ml a~ Iddmml of Ill ~o~ having In inlerest in the ow 30t
1. Purpose ol Re=u~st (describe project): (Orffinence ~8 r~, no.).- :~;-f; ~TZ'~{~L::R?~''' ~ "-'~'~.::.
Approval of ~entative ~a~ceZ Nap No.'*23335+~oz coBe=ctaZ use
(18 Zotm) consistent wlth the ~ancho VllZagem Co~untty ~oZ$cy
2.. Geneml~lion(slreet~d~ss. etcJ North of Winchester Road .(~wy. ,T79} ,~ East
~ ~Ctl~ Temecula Rxnrhn T~ 7J . Rln~ :,, 3W
I Lqsl description (give exlct ~11 de~pt~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,me ~unty R~or~r~ M.y ~ litaChed.
See Attac~ent A ' ! 5~. ';*~. '=,.~ '
SIG ATUR
nnis Xltmek , ~,
AuthOdly IOr this $Dpti~tion ~ hereby 9iv ' ' ' '.:' ,~'~%',', ;~ '~; '~ ': ~ "
,.
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM, ~,~;'~:. --, ,.
Please complele PI~ I lnd II Of thll form l~ ~lde ~ ~ t~ iddltlo~l ~tl~ll r~u.ted In PIH IlL Fitlure to do ~ may
delay lhe review and DrYell ~ your ~r~e~ If you ire unlMe to ~t ~ I~mt~ ~ ~u ~ ~1~ ~e. feel
free Io contact the Plsnni~ De~mnt It ff14) 787~18. ',~:- -' :::~:~'~ ~: ~ .,~. ~':. ' ·
PART I: General Informltlon ~' ~-:'. '~.:"~':"? ~: ': ~:~" :':"
1. Whal iS lhe Tolal AcfelO8 i~v~v~? ~ 4 8.7
2. Is lhefe ~ Dfevious appl~ation fil~ f~ I~ ~me I~? YES ~ NO ~ .. -
If "Ye~' Dfovide CBse Number. AI~ Dfo~ t~ Enviro~n~l A~menl NumNr, W ~ ~d Efi~f~n~I Im~t
Re~d Number, H appli~ble. : . '~ ....
~ ~un~y Policy Pz,e~~ aIR NO. (ff 8~e) ~: · ":" ~; ~. ,':'~
3. A~ffitionel ~mments you may wlh to ~ r~ffil~ ~ur Wl ~¢h In I~MI ~et I
1. II the pro~ct within In AIQuiIt-P~ S~ St~i~ Z~e? ~S D NO ~ ~':. ' :, - .'
To determine ff ~ur proJe~ it I~ted m l Stall Studll Z~ ~i~ the Pul~ Id~te ~ ~ refer to the
SHcl81 Study Zones Maps 8veillble it the Publ~ Inflation C~nter ~ the Pinni~ Dl~d~nL If ~ ~
zone, refer to Ordinance ~7,1. ~ diK~ ~e sHuNion w~h ~ ~n~ G~qi~ .; .+ :~-~':~ ."~ :. · ~ ,.
If 8 fluIt hazard repod is n~esM~, ~m~ele the invelt~ltion ~r to lubmlffi~ ~r ~Q~n I~ W~ 6
the re~d with this fo~. If I wll~r Of N ~uirlmentl i grlnt~ I~ I ~ d N ~r ~ thl fR ·
Element Techn~l Re~t ~h i avaii~ at the Pi~ Inf~t~ C~nter d ~ P/nn~ De~dmnt
~lf the answer to Question e2 ts 'Yet" c~ the I~roOrltl Geqmph~ Plnnl~ TMm ~ to di~u. I~ropdlte
measure tO minimize t he hazar~ Inc~mle any mitigation assume into IN pro~ des~n ~r to lumll~ t~ I~l~-
lion or indicate In the sDace pmv~ed ~ the rlluRI d y~r dll~ wHh IM Pinni~ TM~, .r
3. IfyourOrojectiinthedesedlre~i~Nnl~ndilrdl~l?. · ~aQ ;~>NO~ f:~"' -
The Planning Offices in Indi0 and Reverie MII pr~e y~ with informtionmm!q bl~M ~rdEY~ my also
wish to contact the U.S, Soil Consiesta ~& '~ .... ~. ~; .... ~ ' -
If your proj~t is subje~ to bl~sa~ h~l~t lu~R I ~o~nd c~ Din ~h the ~tl~ ~1~ refer to SeXton 14.1
~ Ordinance 460, If your Wo~Ct II I Mml Np ~ lugNeOn) ..... ~ .'-
4. Is water se~ice lyeliable at the Woie~ ~e? ~S ~ NO D b' . , '. :(~' ' ~' '::,=:~ .:~ .'L' ' ,
If "No," h~ fir must the ~ter IIn~l) N e~e~ to ;~ ~? :" ~ '~ ;J ": ~'' ~;;: ' "' , '
NumNr of fit or milel
.,-...
..
- :.... : ..;., ~': L. '
'~ :V ""'
5. Is se~f ~ice lvBilable It l~ ilia? ~S ~ NO ~ ,~ .r ~ / ·
= ,
If "No," how lit mull lhe wlllr line(8} ~ I~ln~ Io ~ N~? ~ -. V':.,~ ~ ·: ':.~ L :
Num~f ~ leer ~ mi~l
6. A~il~nllCommlnll: ?h~l ~nv~[o~entaZ Zn~o:~on ~o~m ~1 lu~m~tted
~equest ~o: R~p~ovaZ ~ ~entat~ve ~a[ceZ Ha~ No. 2~]~5 and Zone ~hange
(~-~ to C-ZZC-~) conl~ltent v~th the ~ancho V~ZZages Co~n~ty
~Zan. ~he p:oject has ~en a~esled ~n the environmental doc~en~a~on
prepared previously ~oz the Rancho V~llagel ..Policy Plan Area.
PART m: Additional MatsHale ~, ,: . . ','.'- ,, -
:,: ; ...
The foll~tng items must ~ submi~ ~ ~ f~: .
1. At least three (3) plnOr. m~ ~Ot~m~ (~ ~n~ d ~ ~ its, ~ In lel ~o ~ tM 2t If ~ ~t~raphs
t T~ ~litlon fr~ which elch ~ot~ m ~n - ~" ~'- :,' ~ -, ~ ..
b The area of c~emge ~ each ~otq~ " ,-
., ~._ -~, · . ~,
2. A clear Dhot~opy (Xerox or Similar Co~ d ~ a~r~Mte ~ ~ ~ U~ ~1S~ Mdm~le mR ~li~
eati~the~undaries~lhe~o~tA~te~tRi~em~ :. .' ...' , ~ ; .
I cedi~ that I have ~veltiglt~ t~ qNi In P~I I I~ II m~ ~ in~m I~ ~e lad c~ to t~ Nit of my
knowledge. Robe=t B. XembZe, ~Zann~ng Coo:d~na~o~
Eobert Be~n, H[ZZ~am ~rost and Assoc.
114tlml~llllllilll ,.
Roger S. Streeter, Planntng Dtrector'
A PUSLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COI4415510N": to
consider the application(s) described below. The Planntng Department. has
tentatively found that the proposed project(s) will 'have no stgntftcant,'~
environmental effect and has tentatively completed negattve declaration(s).
Place of Hearing: Board Room, 14th Flooro 4080 Lemon Street. 'Rherstdeo'CR
The time of hearing ts Indicated with each appl 1catton 'ltsted'~below' .'~;:
Any person may sulxntt written co~nents to the Planning' Departme'nt 'bef;re'~th[~!~
hearing or my appear and be heard tn support of or opposition to the adoption
of the negattve ~leclaratton and/or approval of thts project at. the t~me
heartrig. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you my be limited.. to
raising only those tssues you or someone else ratsad at the public hearing
described in thts nottce, or in written · correspondence ~( delivered to -theI~'
Planntng Conxntsston at, or prtor to, the publtc heartng,-~:The environmental
ftndtng along with the proposed project application my be viewed at the publtc
tnformt~on counter Honday through Friday from 8:00 a,m, ,nttl .4:?0~. p,m,::.~;!:i;~,,~:-,
CHANGE OF ZONE 5163, E,A, 32718, located in the Rancho California Area. and
Ftrst Supervtsortal Dtstrtct is an appltcatton l sulxnttted f-,to.': amend
Ordinance No, 348, RIverside County Land Use Ordinance, Satd amendment
would change Zone R-R (Rural Residential) to. C-I/~,.-p~~-~ (General
co erctal) or other such zon, s as the Planning 'Co sston find
appreprlate for property general ly described as ':north of !.(Junction f~.of
PARCEL NAP 23335, E,A, 327Z8, is an application submitted by. Rancho'Callfornia
and Development Company for property located'In the.'Rancho"~
Area and Ftrst $upervisortal District which proposes to dtvtde
acres tnto 6 lots on property generally described. as north. of Junctton:~
of ~/tnchester Rd and Ynez Rd. ';*'-'~_:::i!ii,~,~.~:~i:i--~ ~ '!~:~'~ '~";.~:*~
' 0 l~ 7~5 · ' ."
. ~' .; .. ...
· -~ . '.=""'. L L'
I11 I~ I .'.' ..' . · · '
;AN p~ml~', ' ' ...~.
.,.... .~ · .. . · s
. ..
.A~C~, ' = ..
· ...~. : ..~..
A NCNO~ C A~F ,I V l CO
E~m CA~ ·
· .' .. 'm
..~
..
· '.~L" -.'
· ...'~:.....~:..:: ~:..~
CA/UER:ILLO, ICA: ~3~ 9,10200049-6 v
· ..: ..~ .:.-:,.---.~ ....... .
340 II),~IIQI~..STE D · v
C'.,AA&A~'LLG, ,CA: . · · t~OJ,~.' ,
- ,.;:. · ~.
,. · ';¢. . · . 91020QQ41,.7.. ~,,
:i,~'~:Ai.~F~ .... ' '
~ CO" ' · 7' -
~ o .wl~ :~5,q ..'.,. ~;: v
iEM~L~m C4~ · ',: " tf.3~O
· . :::', . ',', , ~,,- ·
· ' - tlIZTO00I-I
9J~J,70005,O.~ v
t!!J,70006-1. ~,~
·
...
913~1~..
:IiVE:DiDE county
iq. nn;n6 DEP, : CEIEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: ~TANDARD ~ALUATION
119
ENVIRONME~ A~E~ME~ (E~) NUMBER: 32718 MODU~ NUMBER(a):
PR~ECT C~E ~PE(s) AND NUMBER~a): CZ 5163 and Co~ercial P.M. 23335"
APPLICA~'S ~ME: Rancho California Develo~ent Cropany
~ME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E~: Gloria Mactel
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum ~t size and uses as applicable):
t~ divide 48.7 acres into 18 Commercial lots with a zone change fram R-R
(Rural-Residential) to C-1/C-P (General Commercial).
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES
C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s):
De
Ge
He
Applicant is proposinq
48.7 ; or SQUARE FED
910-110-029, 31, - 911-180-018
EXISTING ZONING: R-R (Rural-Residential) kS THE PFIOP0,.e~a4. IN CONFORMN~CE?.
I~ROpOSED ZgNING: C-1/C-P (General Commercial) kS THE PROPO~4. IN CONFORMN~ICE?
STREET REFERENCES: North of junction of Winchester Road and Inez Road.
SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T7S, R3W;
section 26 '
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS:
The subject property is currently vacant with moderate rolling hills,"dry grass
and shrubs. Surrounding land uses include commercial development to the west,
and vacant land to the east.
. - ..:t.~. ·
II. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION ~"""~:: ~ '~
~ All or ~d of ~e proj~t site is in "Adopt~ ~if~ PI~s." "REMAP'T:.~ "Ranc~ Villages ~mmuni~
~l~y ~ea". ~mplete ~tion8 III, IV (B ~d C ~ly), V ~d VI. '~:"""'.,:':~'.' ~...~;~,:.', ?.~:.
D All or ~ of the proj~t aite i In "Areas ~t Deslgnat~ u O~n 8~".~" ~mplete ~tions III, IV
D All or ~fl of ~e pro~t site ~s ~ O~ S~ce and ~ati~ desig~t~ offier ~ those ment~n~
a~e. ~mplte ~t~ III, N (~ B, ~d E ~ly), V ~d ~.
III.
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT , .~: '~' % '-"'" .... ' .~'.;,
Indite N nature d ~ pr~ land u. as detemi~ ~om ~ de~dpt~ as f~nd in ~mpr~enlve ~i Pi F~ure
VI.3 (Omi OM). ~is inf~mati~ Is ~sM~ to detemiM ~e ~pr~rial ~ uM ~ilili~ mUngs h. ~ III.B.
:~<..
~ - Not ~pll~le Cffi~l Emnttl ~-High Ri~' '
..
IMi~M w~ · ~s ~ or ~ (N) whether any envlr~nll huard and/~ r~ur~ issues may signlfi~ntly aff~t ~ N afroted
by ~e pr~BI. NI referen~ figures are c~tai~ tn ~e ~mprehensive GeMrat Pin. ~ ~y i~ m~ yes ~) ~ite
edditi~l dal ~urces, agencies consultS, findings of fact and any mitigation measures under ~Uon V. N~, ~ere indi~ted,
ci~ ~e ~propriate land uM sultili~ ~ ~i~ 8~eplili~ rating(s). (~ definit~s at ~om of
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4..N
6- N
7.
(
8.
9- N
10. Y
11, Y
26 Y
27- N
28. y
29- N
30-N
31. Y
Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings: :'''~'
NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable "'- ~' PS - Provisionally Suitable
U - Generally Unsuitable R - Restricted .i"'?,;/A - Generally Acceptable
B - Conditionally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable ...... D - Land Use Discouraged
Alquist-P~olo Special Studies or County Fault
Hazard Zones (Fig. Vl.1 )
NA PS U R (Fig. VI.3)
Liquefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VI.1 }
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.4)
Groundshaking Zone (Fig VI.1) Class ZI.
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.5)
Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps)
Landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale
Seismic Maps oPOn-site Inspection)
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Rockfall Hazard (On-site Inspection)
Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service Soil Surveys)
Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation
Service Soil Surveys)
Wind Ersosion & Blowsend (Fig. VI.1,
Ord, 460, Sec, 14,2 & Ord. 484) ~ -.'
Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.7) Ski nner Dam
Roodplains (Fig. VI.7)
NA U R
..: '-, wtthtn 4 miles
12. Y Airport Noise (Fig. ll.18.5,11.18.11 -,'~'
';L & VI,12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F,B.)
NA .~ .A . ' B :' C ,~' D"' (Fig, VI,11 )
13, N Railroad Noise (Fig. V!,13T V1,16) .'~'..'~
14. Y h N . 7;. haste'
- NA ~.'~A '~ B ';'. C ',:. D ':i~(Fig, V1.11).~
· NA ;'!'A :-: B ~C~;:' D '?(Fig, V1.1;1):-~: '
16. N Project Generated Noise Affecting .'
· :" NOise Sensitive Uses (Fig, VL11 ) ?:
17.. .Oi. Se. al.. Pro t .ig. v,.11)
18, N . Air Quality Impacts From Project-
19, N ,: Project Sensitive to'Air Quality ; ~ ':
20, N , Water Quality Impacts From Project '.
21, N ...~Proiect Sensitive to'Water Quality. ~ :~::-j."'-'~: :-
.;. 22, N Hazardous Materials and Wastes ':'. ~
24. N . mnutes fire respoqse
Vai 1 Dam 25....N... Other" ......:" "' ': + ';' '
Local Important -:C: ~"~'~""ellgtble'state's entc~.ffivy
Farmland, Prime 32. Y . Seenic Highways (Fig, :1,45) ..~-Z5 .~ .
33,, N: Historic Resources (Fig, t/I,32 - VI.33)
34, Y :, "-' Amhaeoiogical Resources" :"~'!:'~-.:~lj.'-!.
: :. ' (Fig. VI,32 - VI.33 & VI,46 ,. VI,48). ":~-
35, Y PatsontOiogical Resources '.-.. · ;'::: ~.
· (PaleontOiogical Resources Map)';
36. N Other. ' ''~' ' .... " "
37, N Other ~ ~
Agriculture (Fig. VI.34 - VI.35)
In or Near an Agricultural Preserve Farm1 and
(Riv, Co, Agricultural Land Conversation
Contract Maps)
Stephen' s Kangaroo
Wildlife (Fig, VI.36 - VI,37) Rat
Vegetation (Fig. VI,38 - VI,40)
Mineral Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI,42)
Energy Resources (Fi , %/I.43 - VI,44)
Therma~ klaters
395-?0(New t2/8/1
LAND USE DETERMINATION .,.:.I.. i~..:~ -;; ..... *...
Complete this part unless the project is located in "Adopted Specific I=ins',*"REMAP''
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s):
2. LAND USE PLANNING AREA:
3. SUBAREA, IF ANY:
4. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY:
Ce
5. COMMUNITY PLAN, IF ANY:
6. COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY:
7. SUMMARY OF POLICIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL:
For all projects, inidcate with a yes (t) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may signiF~,antly affect
or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive ~ Plan. For any
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigat',N3n measures under .Section V.
· PUBUC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES ':i~'!' ." :"~' 'L~!'~:i'~";"~
~. N ~34 ' 10- N EquestrlanTrails(Rg.N.19,N.24/
Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Maps
-
2- N 11- N Utilities (Fig. N.25 ,.N.26)
3- .N 12- N Libraries (Fig. N.17, N.18)
·
4. N ~3- N Heanh Services (Fig. N.~7.~,N.~8)
5- N ~ ~4. Y: Airports (Fig. ti.~8~.-a.~8.4, wtthtn 5.m~les
6 N. ": ~'.:11.18.8-11.18.10&N.27,N.36)
9- N 17, N, Other''''':'''~'''~ ""~'~""'.
i..::!..'
If Idl or part of the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REIVIAP" or "Rancho Villages Community Policy
Areas", review in detail the specific policies 8,opl ing to the pro I, and c~nplete the Io ing:
1. State the relevant land use Uesignation(s): Ca~'~gory ]Z. e~:~s~gnated Cormerctaf~I ~v~ong
Winchester and East of 1-15. -.', ,~..;
Circulation (Fig. IV. 1-N.11. Discuss in
sec. V Existing, Planned & Required Roads)
Bike Trails (Fig. W.12 - N.13)
Sewe~ (AGency Letters)
Rre Services (F~. N.16 - N.18) Wi thin 5 minute
fire response
Sheriff Services (Fig N.17. N.18)
Schools (Fig. N.17 - N.18)
Solid Waste (Fig. N.17 * N.18)
Parks and Recreation (F;. N.19 - N.20)
2. Based on thla Initial study, Is the proposal consistent with the policies and designations of the appropriate docum~,..~
and therefore consistant with the Comprehensive General Plan? If not, explain:" Yes ·.
. :, - :~ · .~ .: ~.
N. LAND USE DETERMINATION (=onUnued) .*'.'-~.:', ':;.,.?~.?.:-~.: .~'-~-t, ,,,:., ,..
D. ff 811 or pad of the project site is in "Areas not Designated as Open Space", and is not in a Community .Plan, complete
questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in 8 Community Plan.:~i:!.?~.~.:.
1. Land use category~les) _ne,:~____ry to suppod the proposed project Also indicate'llnd
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.)
;
2. -'-~' , -., ..-
~ indicate land use type
Current land use cateOory~les) for the site based on exiting conditions,
(i.e. residential, commercial. etc.)
If D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be resolved at the development stage?. Explain:
4. Community Plan designation(s): Rancho Villages Cm~rnunit. y PoliCy Plan
hi the pmposedpr~ectconsistent with thepoliclesendclesignatlons ~theCommunity
ffnoL exp~in: Yes - ~thin Planning area "F" designated for commerda
along ~inchester Road and East of 1-15. ':~" ' ":~'
Is the proposal compaUble with existing and proposed surrounding land
ff not, explain: Yes
· '. :~ .':..~::
,Plan? _
] ' land 'USES
':.7,-7::- :Y..~-
,, ;.:,~
' ;'.,,5'
,-:. ,....
uses? :4::,?, ;"',
· ,..~,, , , ,,, , -
~ ~ .. -,...., , -. .....
., ,, ,:' :,.~, ,;r;_".-,! :,
7. Based on lhis initial study, is the proposal consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan?i:.: .:
' If not. reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencieS~*'" Yes :"'
ff all or part of Ihe project oite hi in an Open Space and Conaervation:,designatlon, ;complete"the following:'
2. hi the proposal consistent with the designation(s)? If not, explain:
3. Based on this initial study. is the proposal consisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?, .;'!' :,.
If nol. reference by Section end Issue Number those issues identifying inconalstef:m..ies: ':"~!" ' "~':':'"
295-7'0 (New
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
IIIB-2
IIIB-28
IIIB-34
SECTION/
ISSUE NO,
IIIB-2
IIIB-3
IIIB-IO,11
IIIB-12.
IIIB-14
IIIB-26
INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES "'" ~' c:..':. '; -, ~,.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
NFORM^T ON NFO. M,T N ;5.
REQUIRED REQUESTED "-~' RECEIVED ~f~2(YES/NOJ)ATE)
Biological Report 5-12-88 '~'-' 6/88" '~!¢ ves"'
Archaeological Report S-12-BB -i .6/8B ' ~.:L~' yes'
· ), .,.
For each issue marked yes {Y) under Sections III.B and N.B, identify the Section and l~u~ number and do the
3. State specific mitigation measures, if identifiable withoul requiring an anvironmental Impact report (E.I.R.)
4. If additional information is required before the environmental assessment can be completed, refer to
Subsection A. ' ' , ':~ ' -.-.~ .. :. ':.:-t.: .",i!":' . ..::::~.
5. If additional sheets are needed to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach
the .ece-aw ahee . " ' '. '- ,,
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
The ~ubject ~ite iq within ~ liquefacttnn pntentt~l ~nne, Hittg~tinn
are set forth in Liquefaction Report No. 509 which was prepared for the
.quhject qite in M~y lqRR and will h~ intpl~m~nt~d thrn-gh th~ rnndtttnn~ nf.
approval. ..... , I,. . ..... ~ ,..,,
The project falls within the Class II groundshakingzone'~'ii~'The project will
., . ....... :, , . ._-,.. ,.;2;
adhere to the Uniform Building Code Standards atidevelopment'~'stage.
Dam Inundation and potential floodplains will be'mitigated by flood control's
conditions of approval,
The project site falls within i few miles of the Rancho California'Airport,
Noise concerns will be addressed at development sta~e, "">~'~""~""': '~;L:?';~'
lhe subject site encompasses highway noise, however the proposed use
(conm~ercial development} is a compatible use for this area,"
Development of the property will result in a.loss of prime and local
Important Farmland, However, surroundin~ uses for this area:include '
Industrial and cormnerctal land uses, Surrounding°uses also are developed
Industrial and Commercial, therefore the sub.iect'property.'Would not be-
conducive for agricul lure use, '-'
29~/O O~w 12~1)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
IIIB-28
IIIB-31
IIIB-32
IIIB-34
IIIB-35
INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MfflGATION ME. ASURES:; ,. ,
Biological Report No. 212 was prepared for the site to address the'impact
on Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat on June of 1988. '* No Stephens Kangaroo Rats
were found on the property, therefore no mitigation is required.
Thermal Waters is not technoloqically feasible to access as an energy
resource therefore no mitigation i's required. '*'*' * "' ~ **
If the subject property is to be developed the site will "be'conditioned for
a landscaping plan prior to issuance of buildinq permits to assure the
development is aesthetically pleasinq.
· ,~,.'; ~ -: ~-~ ........
Archaeological Report No. 1217 was prepared for the site 'and no'culture''~:'-':''
artifacts were found therefore no mitiqation measures are necessary.
The project will be conditioned that a qualified paleolologist be present
during grading.
D See affachedpagea.
Vl. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: '~:
[] The project will not have a significant effect on the environment end a NegaUve Declaration may be
prepared. . , ,/' ...... ~ ,:; .'
[] The project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a significant
effect in this case because the mitigation measures deecribed in Section V. have been applied to the
project and a Negative Declaration may be prepared.
[] The project may have a significant effect on the environment 'and an Environmental Impact Report
Name:
Prepared by '. · -,"
(New 12/81)
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 25° 1991
10. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2333S
10.1 Proposal for first exte.~ion of time. Project located
North of Junction of Winchester Road and'Ynez Road.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that the decision by the
Commission would be a recommendation to the City
Council.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:15 P.M.
GREG ERICKSON, Bedford Properties, Single Oak Drive,
Temecula, representing the applicant, gave a brief
presentation on what type of tenants are proposed
for this project. He also discussed access of the
project. Mr. Erickson presented Assistant City
Attorney John Cavanaugh a letter from Bedford Properties
op~psing Condition of Approval No. 16.
~COF~IBffiIONE~ EOA~D moved to close the public hearing
at 8~20 P,~, and ~dop~ Resolution 91-fnext} recommending
that the City Council approve ~entative Parcel ~ap 2~5
based on the analysis and findings contained in the
staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval
as presented by staff.
1.
'ATIVE PARCEL MAP 26664
11.1
)osal for a 21 parcel Planned Industri.
Dj ' on the Site of previously Plot Plan
Located at the southeasterly of Business
Park and Rancho Way.
GARY ,L advised that this would be continued
off calendar
12. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 91-1
12.1
Proposal to provid,
Plan approvals
Permits city
:ension Procedure for Plot
Conditional Use
STEVE
provided the staff re
COMM
HOAGLAND moved to Adopt Reso 1
recommending to the City Council
Amendment 91-1 providing an Extension of
PCMIN2 5/91
-12-
2/26/91
./
DATE:
TO:
MEETING OF:
AGENDA ITEM
No.:
SUBJECT:
MINUTE ACTION OF TIIE Ci I Y COUNCIL OF TIlE
CITY OF TENIECULA, CALIFORNIA
March 28, 1991
Gary Thornhill
City of Temecula Planning Department
March 26, 1991
Item 17
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 - First Extension of Time
The motion was made by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall
to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335, A SIX (6) PARCEL COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION OF 10.18 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF THE JUNCTION
OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910-110-029, 031, AND 910-180-018.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temec.la, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY,
under penalty of perjury, the forgoing to be the official action taken by the City Council at the
above meeting.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of March, 1991.
[SEALI
GREEK, CITY CLERK
ITEM NO. 8
APPROVAL
FINANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
September 24, 1991
Final Parcel Map No. 24762
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
R ECOMMEN DAT ION:
That the City Council APPROVE Final Parcel Map No. 24762 subject to the Condition~
of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 24762 was approved by the Riverside County Planning
Commission on February 28, 1990, and the City of Temecula City Council on May 8,
1990.
Parcel Map No. 24762 is a two (2) lot commercial subdivision of approximately .78
acres. The site currently supports two (2) commercial buildings (Plot Plan No.
10922). The site is located at the northeast intersection of Enterprise Circle West
and Rider Way. The applicant, California Urban Investments, Inc., is represented
by Ranpac Engineering corporation.
All development fees were paid with the recordation of the underlying Tract Map
( No. 16178) and with the issuance of building permits. Additional development fees
were not conditioned as part of the Final Map Approval for this project since
buildings currently exist onsite and no new construction is proposed. All offsite
improvements have been completed and therefore, bond and securities are not
required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not determined.
ENG\PM24762.STF\ks 1
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council approval Final Parcel Map No. 2~762 subject
to the Conditions of Approval.
KW/TN:ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
/~.
5.
Fees 8 Securities Report
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Final Parcel Map
Riverside County Planning Department Staff
Report and Conditions of Approval
ENG\PH24762.STF\ks 2
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
IMPROVEMENTS
SECURITY
Streets and Drainage $
Water $
Sewer $
TOTAL $
*ltsinten~nce Retention (10t for one year)
*(or Bonds if ~ork is completed)
DATE:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
September 13, 1991
MATERIAL 8 LABOR
SECU R I TY
$ o0-
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ -0-
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Stripin9 Costs
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
-0-
-O-
Paid
-0-
-0-
-0-
· Planning Fee
Quimby Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
Fee Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
103.00
-0-
8.00
790.00
-0-
250.00
1,151.00
-0-
ENG\PM24762. STF\ks
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Parcel Map No. 2~762
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
( Quimby )
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Condition No. 12
ENG\PM24762.STF\ks
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH FLOOR
4080 LEMON STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director
A PUBLIC HF_ARING has been scheduled before the P)NING COMMISSION to
consider the application(s) described below. The Planning Deparl~nent has
tentatively found that the proposed project(s) will have no significant
environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s).
The Planning Commission will consider whether or not to adopt the negative
declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing.
Place of Hearing: Board Room, 14th Floor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
Date of Hearing: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1990
The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below.
Any person. may submit written comments to the Planning Department before the
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption
of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to_
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The environmental
finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public
information counter Nonday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m.
!~~.MAI~:Re~EA 33868 is an application submitted by California Urban
Investments, Inc. for property located in the Temecula Area and First
Supervisorial District and generally described as northeast of
Enterprise Circle West, northwest of Rider Way which proposes to
divide 0.78~ acre into 2 lots
TIME OF HEARiMG: 1:30 p.m.
Zoning Area: Temecula
First Supervisorial District
E.A. Number: 33868
PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
Planning Commission: 02-14-90
Agenda item No. 3-1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2. Engineer/Rep.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Location:
5. Existing Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
9. Comprehensive General
Plan Designation:
10. Land Division Data:
11. Agency Recommendations:
Letters:
Sphere of Influence:
California Urban Inv., inc.
RANPAC Engineering Corp.
Subdivision of .78 acres into
two commercial lots with a
minimum of .33 acres each.
Northeast of Enterprise Circle
West, and Northwest of Rider
Way.
M-SC
M-SC
The site currently supports two
(2) commercial buildings (Plot
Plan 10922) in an urbanized
area.
Rapidly developing commercial
and industrial area.
Southwest Area Community Plan
Land Use: LI (Light Industrial)
Category II
Open Space/Cons: Areas not
Designated as Open Space.
Total Acreage: .78
Total Lots: 2
See letters dated:
Road: 7-21-89
Health: 10-30-89
Flood: 6-06-89
Fire: 6-07-89
Bldg. & Safety-
Land Use: 7-21-89
Grading: 7-20-89
Opposing/Supporting: None
Within the City of Temecula.
i~NRT.YS T S:
Project n~SCr{pt~On
Tentative Parcel Map No.24762 is an application to divide .78 acres
into two commercial lots, .45 acres and .33 acres in the Temecula
area. The site is located northeast of Enterprise Circle West, and
northwest of Rider Way.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
Staff Report
Landuse and Zoning
The site supports two buildings currently under construction.
Surrounding land uses are primarily commercial/industrial with some
retail. The site is within the Southwest Area Community Plan and is
designated as Light Industrial. This site is also within the newly
incorporated City of Temecula. Surrounding zoning is also Light
Industrial.
R4vers{de Co-nty Co-~rehens~ve General Plan:
The site is located within the Southwest Area Community Plan and is
designated as Light Industrial. The proposed use is approved per the
Southwest Area Community Plan and is therefore consistent with the
Comprehensive General Plan.
~nv{ronmental Assessment:
The initial study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 33868 has
indicated impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. The site is
located within the approximate limits of the 100-year floodplain,_the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, and a potential Liquefaction
Zone. All environmental concerns can be mitigated through the
conditions of approval.
FTNDTNGS:
1. The applicant'proposes to divide .78 acres into two commercial
lots, .45 acres and .33 acres in the Temecula area.
2. The site supports two buildings currently under construction.
Surrounding land uses are primarily commercial/industrial with some
retail. Surrounding zoning is also Light Industrial.
3. The site is within the Southwest Area Communit~ Plan and is
designated as Light Industrial. This site is also within the newly
incorporated City of Temecula.
4. Environmental concerns include impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo
Rat. The site is also impacted by the 100-year floodplain, the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, and the zone for potential
liquefaction.
2
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
Staff Report
CONCt.USTONS:
1. The project is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan,
and is therefore consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan.
2. All environmental concerns have been mitigated.
PRCOMMENDATTONS:
~DOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No.
33868 based on the findings that the proposed project will not have a
significant effect on the environment~ and
~PPROV~T. of TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.24762 based on the findings and
conclusions incorporated in the staff report and subject to the
attached conditions of approval.
JSA:ja
1/30/90
3
PLANNING COMMISSION NmARING DATE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
The following conditions of approval are for Parcel Map No.
24762 - A two lot subdivision of .78 acres.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from
any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set
aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County of Riverside,
its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body
concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 24762, which action is
brought within the time period provided for in California
Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside
will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action,
or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside.
The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of
Ordinance No. 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the
conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map
will expire two years after the Board of Supervisors approval
date unless extended as provided by Ordinance No. 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer
or licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of
the State of California Subdivision Map Act, Riverside County
Subdivision Ordinance No. 460.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the governing body
accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be
free from all encumbrances as approved by the County Road
Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map
if within the land division boundary. All offers of
dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and
utility access. All easements, offers of dedication, and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the
Riverside County Surveyor.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided
from the parcel map boundary to a County maintained road.
All delinquent property taxes
recordation of the final map.
shall be paid prior to
Prior to any grading, a grading plan in compliance with the
Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance No.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement
recommendations outlined in the County Road Department's
transmittal dated October 30, 1989, a copy of which is
attached.
//~2e
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control
recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control
District's letter dated June 6, 1989, a copy of which is
attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood
control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside
County Land Division Ordinance No. 460, appropriate fees for
the construction of area drainage facilities shall be
transmittal dated July 20, 1989, a copy of which is a~ached.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
16 The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined
~ in the County Geologist transmittal dated February 5, 1981,
a copy of which is attached.
~IU~lor to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall
~ comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the
provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment
of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall
D pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County Ordinance or resolution.
EVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
18. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with
the development standards of the M-SC zone.
19.
All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum
area of 10,000 square feet net.
20.
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each
lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3600 square
feet, exclusive of the utility easement.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with
Section 3~8C of Ordinance No. 460.
2.
Corner lots shall be provided with additional area pursuant
to Section 3.8B of Ordinance No. 460.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT Swm.~T CONDITIONS:
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared
with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the
County Surveyor. Prior to the recordation of the final map,
a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning
Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
The following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental
Constraints Sheet:
"Structures for human occupancy shall not be allowed in
the delineated constraint area. This constraint affects
parcels ."
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24762
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
"County Geological Report No. 216 was prepared for this
property on February 5, 1981, by Ertec, Inc., and is on
file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
Specific items of concern in the report are as follows:
Fault Hazards."
"County Geological Report No. 167 was prepared for this
property on February 5, 1981, by Ertec, Inc., and is on
file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
Specific items of concern in the report are as follows:
Liquefaction."
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of
Mount Palomar Observatory. Light and glare may adversely
impact operations at the Observatory. Outdoor lighting
shall be from low pressure sodium lamps that are oriented
and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the luminaire."
JJ:aea
6-14-88
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
RQAD AND STJRVL'Y
LeRm, D. Smoot
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE:
July 21, 1989
COtr1~' AD~D~'TRATR'~ Ci~rTF. R
MA~RNG ADORJ!~
P.O. BOX 1090
R~T. RSZDr. CAMTORN~ 92 502
(714) 787-65~4
PM 24762
Schedule E - Team 5 - SMD #9
AP# 111-111-111-9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative
land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider
provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement
Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map
correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their
omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for--
further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions at.
essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as
though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditlons for a complete design of the improvement. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred
to the Road Commissioner's Office·
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage
easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as
follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions,
or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of
all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site.
In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article
XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the
quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of
streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities
as approved by the Road Department.
COUNTY AIM'4INISTRATTV~ CENTER * 4080 !.Z~ON 511tEirr, PJVEa.2DE, ~ 92501
~M 24762
July 21, 1989
Page 2
/
'10 ·
4e
Major drainage is involved on this project and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Enterprise Circle West and Rider Way shall be improved with
34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part
width dedicated right of way in accordance with County
Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33')
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805
shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance ~or main-
tenance by County.
The developer/owner shall submit a detailed soils investi-
gation report addressing the construction requirements
within the road right of way.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho
California Water District prior to the recordation of the
final map.
The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of
Ordinance 461.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90 with a minimum
50' tangent measured from flow line or as approved by the
Road Commissioner.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and
401 (curb sidewalks) or as approved by the Road
Commissioner.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Traffic signal mitigation has been met on this project by
TR 16178.
- PM 24762
july 21, 1989
Page 3
15.
The itreet design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with tentative TR 16178 and PP 10922.
Street lights shall be installed in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads
constructed or improved within the subdivision. The County
Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the
subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If
not, the land owner shall file, after receiving tentative
approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into
or creation of a County Service Area in accordance with
Governmental Code Section 25210.1.
Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit
district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment of the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
Za:jw
Very truly yours,
Subdivision Engineer
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT
October 30, 1989
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside. CA 92502
ATTNz Michael Bacon
PEt PARCI;r[- MAP 24762: See attachment
(3 Lots)
NOV Z
Rh'._RSIDE COUt..~Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Gentlemen:
IIILTN
ao&l ~AMIIT IV~llT
lANelING. ~
,riflE. CA
?d~40 uAROUERITA
COlOIl
lOS IOUTHMNA vISTA
COIqOIIA. C& 11710
IllliT
II0 NORTH IYATI81'.
fiEIT. CA lll4l
emelO
41-lo$ OAlll ITlllll
ItSDie. CA lifO1
&&El ILlfilet!
LAICE ELIIIIOI~.CLIIII6
elLs IP'llllll
l}iS T,N~IGUITZ..ICt,,AL.LIIi
leAi. li lls'IRINQ,i. CA IllIs'
13TeeOieTH'O'II1~ET
Ilwllllll
ls20 LINDIN lTlltll
RiVllqllO~, Ca. Ill0/'
IIII 11lISteN II. vO.
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative MaD
No. 24762 and recommends that:
A water system shall be Installed accordins to
plans and specification as aDDroved by the water
company Lad the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate. with I minimum scale
not less than one Inch e~uals 200 feet. aloha with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor.
The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter.
location of valves and fire hydrants: pipe and
Joint specifications. and the size of the main
at the jtznctioA of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in all
respects with Dlv. 5. Part I. Chapter 7 of the
California Health and Safety Code. California
Administrative Code. Title 22. Chapter 16. and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California. when applicable.
The plans shall be ,i~ned by a registered enqineer and
water company with the followinq certification: "I
certify that the desiqn of the water system in Parcel
Map 24762 is accordance with the water system expansion
plans of the Lake Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District and that the water service. storage and
distribution system will be adequate to provide water
service to such parcel map.
Pa~e Two
ATTN: MIchael Bacon
October ~0, 1989
This certification does not constitute a auarantee
that it will supply water to such parcel map at any
speclflc quantities. flows or pressures for flre
protection or any other purpose". This certification
shall be signed by a responsible official of the water
company. The plsns must be submitted to the County
Survevor's Office to review at least two weeks Drier to
~he request for the recordorion of the final maD.
Th~s Department has a statement from Lake El$inore Valley
Municipal Water DIstrict aQreeing to serve domestic water to
each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed w~th the
subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arranuements
to be made prior to the recordorion of the fina! map.
This Department has a statement from the Lake ElsXnore
Valley Municipal Water District'agreeing to allow the
subdivision sewjoe system to be connected to the sewers of
the District. The sewer system shall be installed accordln~
to plans and specifications as approved by the District. the
County SurveyOr and the Health Department. Permanent prints
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted Xn
triplicate. alonq with the original drawinq. to the County
Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter.
location of manholes. complete profiles. pipe and joint
specifications and the size of the sewers at the Junction of
the new system to the existing system. A sinqle plat
indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be
a portion of the sewage plans and profiles.
The plans shall be signed by a registered enqineer and the
sewer district with the following certification= "I certify
that the desiQn of the sewer system in Parcel Map 24762 is
in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the
Lake Kleinore Valley Municipal Water District and that the
waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the
anticipated wastes from the proposed parcel map." The
~,st he suh-ittea to the Co,may S,,rvevor's Office to review
-t Is-st two weeks mrior to the req,,est for the recordtalon
of the fin-I
PaGe Throe
ATTN: Mxchael Bacon
October 30. 1989
It wXll be necessary for fxnancXal arranaements to be
completely finalxzed prxor to recordatXon of the final maD,
Sam MartXnez. Environmental Health SDeciaAist IV
EnvlronmentaA Health Servxces
SM:tac
~" RANGE:"'-.'.~"-~ WEST ;. ~' SAN BERNAR . 6, 'TOWNSHip 7 SOUTH,
~AS'~;""'INSTRUHENT-:~NO,~,.:-;260680,:'AND RE-RECORDED ' .'
.:.1609, '-'DESCR ! BED AS "
:~'ADJUS'THENT ~
?'~'qB~e~:EAST q96,~0.-'FEET~TO THE SOUTHERLy LINE OF
' ' ~iiND PAR ALONG THE SOUTHERLY/LINE OF SAID PARCEL
.-' "~"'-:'. '!.~ EXCEPTING :THEREFROM :'.THAT .]"Ot~ ~)E'DICA 'TO THE "COUNTY ~: :.'
KwNNETH L, [DWARDS
CHIEF INQINILrR
Illl MARKFrlTREL"T
P.O. BOX 1033
TLI,.EPNONE (714) 717.2015
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County .,vetore,pro. CALI~el:)IINiA .)mmOZ
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. ~
Planner/~/,'fA.e ( R. to~
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the r~
f4,u'r;,~ ('te, "~'t, et.,.l, Vail, AbP Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in acco ce with the Xpplicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
Implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of P/vt 1 |TfS . The project will be
1 azard w t
free of ordinary storm food h hen improvements have been construc ed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
cc: P- ,qPA C
ry ,tru/y y~/our~,
H~ H. ~ASHUBA
~r'Civil Engineer'.
DATE:
l:~sn~ing & F. nginefrinS Omce
46-20~ Ouis .~3.~, Suite 405
lndio, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
ILP~d~IDE COUNTY
}"IRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WffH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPAI~TMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PI~O'r~CTION
6-07-89
Planning & EnSinffting Office
4080 Lemon Strett, Suite 11L
Rivehide, CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: MICHAEL BACON
PARCEL MAP 24762
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 5000 GPM
and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2500 GPM for
hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure.
Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2-2i") shall be located at each street
intersection and spaced not more than 350 feet apart in any direction, with
no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certification: "l certify that the design of the water system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Dept."
The .required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Kurt Bentwell, Fire Safety Specialist
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
July 21, 1989
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Patti Nahill
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Parcel Map 24762
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following-comments and conditions:
Site development of Plot Plan 10922 to remain in conformance
with Parcel Hap 24762.
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
The site is located in a special studies zone.
Very truly yours,
/s.n
Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
~E~
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Department of Building and Safety
DATE
INITIAL: ~'/~/ '
Prior to commencing any Grading exceeding 5; cubic yards,
the owner of that property shall obtain · Grading permit
from the Department of BuildinG and Safety
Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a Grading permit
and approval of the rough Grading shall be obtained from
the Buil~inG and Safety Department.
Prior to issuance of any butldinG permit, the property
Owner shall *obtain a GradinG permit and aQQroval to
construc~ from the Building and Gafety Department.
ConstructinG a road, where greatjr than 5; Cubic yards
material is placed or moved, requires · gradinV permit.
Prior to Occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this
permit. · grading permit and approval of the Grading shall
be o~tained from the Building an~ Safety Department.
Provide verification that the existing gra~ing
permitted and approval to construct' was obtained from
Building and Safety.
The Grading Section has no comment on this site.
the
ES.-13k
For the final Or·dinG plan - Please provide the applicable
information from County GradinG Forms ~S.-ea "
Rev. 3/89
ABB:db 1081
February 5, 1981
PLANNING COMMISSION ·
ELMER M. KATZENSTEIN. caaww~ ,,,mmeu,
RONALD W. SULLIVAN. Neeam RUSSELL F. CAMPBELL
JESS L ULUBRIDGE. camraM MARION V. ASHLEY. ~
KAY H. OLESEN, m~m omen
PATRICIA NEMETH - AI.C.P. - PLANNING D;RECTOR
Ertec, Inc.
3777 Long Beach Boulevard
Long Beach, California 90807
d. C3~O LrMON STRELr, r. ITN Fl,CX)R. RIV'F. JttSIOF,. CAL.IC)d~NiA 12eJOt
Attention: Robert Lynn, Senior Geologist
Oear Mr. Lynn:
SUBJECT:
Fault Hazard Report
Project No. 79-233-01
Tract 16178 ~ ~-....
County Geologic Re n h I ~)
~,A, Nicholas & Co.c o C'&' ifornia
We have reviewed your report entitled "Fault Hazard Investigation Approximately lO0-
acres parcel, a portion of Tentative Parcel Nap 13542, Riverside County California".
We have also reviewed your Revised Figure 2 transmitted on October 31, 19BO. Your
report determined that:
1. The Waldomar fault crosses the property and should be considered active and
capable of causing ground-surface displacement across its trace.
2. A previous liquefaction report by Pioneer Consultants, designated as County
Geologic Report No. 167, determined that there was the possibility that soils
liquefaction could occur at the site during a future earthquake along the
Elsinore Fault Zone. This same report assigned a Richter Hagnitude 7.5 earth-
quake to the Elsinore Fault, and established a maximum bedrock acceleration of
0.369 to the site.
Your report reconrnended that:
1. No human occupancy structuresshould be built within the Building Restriction Zone
as shown on Figure 2 in the report.
2. The Building Restriction Zone should be suitable for non-habitable structures,
access roads, green belts, and utility lines as long as provisions are made to
account for several feet of displacement.
3. The aforementioned ltquefacUon report, GR 1167, recoamended that in order to
mitigate the liquefaction hazar(, the bottom of any butldin9 foundation should
be constructed at least 10 feet above the highest groundwater encountered in the
area. This keuld mean putting the base of the footings no lower than elevation
1010.
It ts our opinion that the report was performed in a c~mpetent manner consistent with
the present "state-of-the-art' and satisfies the requireracnt~ of the Alquist-Priolo
Ertec, Inc.
Fault Hazard Report
Page -2-
2/5/81
Special Studies Zones Act and the associated Riverside County Ordinance No. 547.
Final approval of the report is hereby given.
We reconTnend that the following conditions be satisfied before issuance of any County
permits associated with this project:
1. The Building Restriction Zone, as shown on Figure 2 of the report, shall be
delineated on the Environmental Constraints Sheet (E.C.5.) and labelled
'Fault Hazard Area".
2. A note shall be placed on the E.C.S. stating:
'This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures for human occu-
pancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard Area.' This constraint affects
parcels ."
3. Notes shall be placed on the final tract map stating:
(a) 'County Geologic Report No. 216 was prepared for this property in July,. 1979,
by Fugro, Inc., and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
The specific item of concern in this report is earthquake faulting.
(b) 'This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures for human
occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard Area. This constraint
affects parcels , as shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor.'
4. A copy of the final map and Environmental Constraints Sheet shall be submitted
to the Planning Department Engineering Geologist for review and approval.
Xt'should be noted that the exploratory trenches backfill was not tested for compaction
as a part of this investigation. This should be considered prior to the issuance of
any grading or building permits on the property, or the construction of any utility
lines or roads. The developer, N. A. Nicholas & Company (Nicholas ConTnerce Park}, has
deposited $1600 in the Rancho California Branch of the Bank of America, who will hold
these funds until the County Road Department is satisfied that the trench hackfill has
been properly compacted. The Bank of~merica has issued an Instrument of Credit dated
January 30, 1981, which outlines the terms and conditions which must be met by the
~ermttee in this matter.
Very trulyyours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT
Patrtcta Neme h, AICP, Planning Director
An'thony B. B/o~, Engineering Geologist
CEG - 901
ABB:db
cc: M.A. Nicholas & Co.
Earl Hart
Building & Safu~y
Apt11 Z0, 1979
David Id. Turner, Ctv11 Engtneef
Ptoneer Consultants
251 Teessee Street
i~dlUds, California 92373
J~b No. 34)S2-002
Tenf4the Parcel Hap No. 13542
CeuntJ, Geologic Report lle. 167
R. A. Ntchel&s- Rancho Caltfornl~
Our fir. Turner:
Me have reYteved y~jr 11~eficttoe report; for the su~:lect letsthe
Percel Hap. Your report deterelne~ that there Is · Imsstbtllty that
soils liquefaction could occur it the site during e future em'tlxNake
along the [lsteore f&ult zone.
Your report recome~ded that tn order to etttpte the l lcluefect4oe hazard:
the bettea of ~,,v butldtng fe~mdattons should be censtrvcted at least 10
feet above the htghest ground valet encountered tn the area. This v~j1d
Bean IxJtttn~; the base of the footings he leer Than elevation 1010.
It Is wr ~nloe that the report as I~'foraed tn · coepetenT, mnrer a~
t~ ~attM: '~ ~1~tc ~ i. 167 m ~ Fm~ for
MB:lm
co: R.A. lidalas,
de bit. C. Tbul
ktldtig &tStfaty Bet.
ILIVEMID[ COIMTT I&,NIXIG [~AR11(NT
P&trtctl lelwtb, 'AIP, Pi&nnSeg Dtrictor-'
MtI.NW l. Imm,
F.q~Nerlq bololtst - EG-101
-ram' ,'m~m,/:-
PI.4nninc DEP r ntEnC
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO.
PARCEL MAP NO.
PLOT PLAN NO.
[:) PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. -
O TRACT MAP NO ....
r.:~ 1 u 7989
INCOMPLETE APPLI~TIONS ~ NOT BE ACCE~D.
RP. E~SiDE COUNTy
A A~LICA~ INFORMA~ON PLANNh~G
1. A~GnI'INime: ~alifor~ia Urban ~nves~ents, Inc.
MadmngAOOreM: 1202 Kettner B1vd., Ste. 4500, San Diego, CA 92101
TeI~p~eNo.: ~..6!9 ) 236-17?1
2. Own.fro Nm.: 1rite:national. Develo2~nt an~ Eonst:uct~on,
MamhngA~re~: 1202 Kettner Blvd. Ste. 4500, San Diego, ~ 92101
Teme~eN~: ( 619 ) 236-1771 (a&m-5 ~m.)
3. R.~esemam,.: ~anpac ~ng~neez~ng
Ma,,ngA.me.: 2?44? ~nte:p:~se C~zcZe West, ~emecula, CA 92390
'if~il ~n ~TAT! '
NOTE :if mo~e then one Des is involved in Ihe t~ershiD ol the IxoDerly ixing developed s separmle ;}age must De
attached tO this N)pllClllO~ which lilts the nasal and addresses of el# persons heyrag an anterest in Iris OwnerShaD ol
the properly. --
8, PROJECT INFORMATION
1. PurpoM d Reuest(l:lescnl)eprolect):
Parcel Map application to divide lot 6 tract no. 16178 into two separate
lots.
Z Re~tedclleslilldmc~nNnctionwithth~rm3uest:
PZot PZen No, 10922
C. PROPERTY INFORMATION
2. Genial kXatma ImUeet
Northwesterly corner of the intersection of Enterprise Circle West and
Rider Way
:1 Section 35 __ T~ 7 south ~ 3 west
4. ~teG~~: 0.78 ac
4080 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 62501-3657
(714) 787-6181
4&209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(61~ 342-8277
REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERI NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
APPLICATIONS FOR
PARCEL MAPS
TRACTS
ZONE CHANGES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
PUBLIC USE I:~RMITS
IMND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM
18.30 PLOT PLANS ReQu,e,n;:
Al&~ii~tlrllb ~4ultd.lm.y .COmme rc.~
Illllialrml )
VARIANCES
TEMPORARY USE PERMITS
The tOIlOenn~ dem$ will t31 reqv,red it Ihe .me Of llng 01 me sixwe finalell cams iI~dgal,ons
I TWO denit, el piCk,ageS tO I)e me;led m lepimll
l14,l~MDlr Illd tIM wOrCi 'tll)ll&,."lrld Shell COflllllt l!t41 1Odll;el~:
IsiSmint roll J
b. A etme_,~-:__,J,,:,y~ Of the M(xame~lKme(I iraJoel&.
c. CMe libel kx U~w Ippbcard
el.
e. PORLANDDIVIIIONCAIEIONLY:AnlY~"X 11'mductmeollhelentatNemaD
2 FOur lyT)tCl ills Of 0urnNil a1311& Of the I.l~lClnL Ownlr.efiginelr,lnd rllXlmslllllsve wslh Ihelr m,l:i;n; Illclresse 5, D onc
mckXle duplale mall 1allIll IDl~..Inl aM owfier ,ItC .111 Ut calRt.Tllel4 tRouid 131 NIl"led ifi · bitlee .112 Icl I nvetolx · no
stand Io Ihe o~s~e ot one el Ihe large roenil· endlibel mlntionld m lie· I above
3 ~r1dt~hon~}y~he~i~ec~n1131ny~ngen~f~r~U~Wyor~1~he~Xweb~c~eqsie~nd~cc~r~t~.T~e~aA~se~r~hc~
well fiOI weNt· or Ceddy me prgoeny owner kst
4 On · coDy ot yOur Izhtll Oi' tenIlls· maID i,l'sow III partial m 300 lest. On IM IMp.Went the Ml~s 01 811 W0Nfly Owner:
The aDOre holed inlm'mll~n sly be oOta:ned IW contacts0 · Util lelMfince cmlany m the Revers~e ~:xmly
PROPERTY OWNERI CERTIFIC:A TION
I. Kevin T. Hughes .eefl~Nt~n May 9, 1989
Ikn Neeel eaemelarWa,~ .'
the attmchN I~petty ~n~em hit ~l ~e~md by Ranpat Engineering Corporation
NMnl I= I~lmn r~uiremenll lurmlhee ~y N Ri~ml CNnI~ PiMeN DeM.mem ~ blle& I Compete ane uue
m~lm ~ ~er ~ IRe ~ W~nW I~ aM ·Mr W~ ~ m~ ~ leel ~ IM ~DM~ ~w mv~U m Ihe IODhC I.
1TI*LEIREGISTRATION:
ADDRESS:
KeYin T. Hughes
Assistant Planner
27447 Enterprise Circle West
Temecula, CA 92390
mmsm.-lpmj
STAFe JSE ONLY
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Please complete Parts I and II el thts hxm 8nd IN'Chide III el the IClditiOftl met·flats rscluemed in Per1 III. Fl|lufe tO el· sO may
delay the rewew and Ixecew el your IxlYiect. If YOM are uMbie tO provide the Informat·n, or y~ need sam·lance. Dieate feel
free tO contact the Pinning DeC~rlment It f/t4) 787-6418.
PART I: General Intermition
1. ~tltilthe'rNllAcmlgelew~ved? 0.78
2. I~themalx~v~J~kmRiedkxmeeemeNte7 YEBI3 NOY~3
~"Yel," Ixovide Case Numlxf. AM· IxlwkM the Environmental Allelement Number, If known, and Environmental Impact
Relxxt Nue~er, il applicable.
CASE NO. P,P. 3.0922 (PenxlMs~Z, oneCIange, etc.)
LA, NO. 33362 IKfwemI, EIRNO. Ollllidicabie)
AddltioMI comments y~j may ~ te ~ regBr~ng y~ur Ixl//ect. (Attach In ·editrot sheet II necessary.)
PART II: Environmental Ouostkmnalm
1. Is the proJec~weNn sn AiQu~-Pdelo Bpocial atmies Zonet YF, SD NOb
To determine If yoof Ix·joel is locitoe In · 8pecal ark·los Zone, ~etact Ihe Pubic InformNion Section, or refer to the
8pecll Study Zonos MaIM svBllble st the PulMic Information Counter el the PIBnning DepertmenL If the Ixoject ks wtthln ·
zone. ·for to Offiinanc~ 547.1, ~ discuss the Ntultiofi wtth fte County Ge~4ogllt.
ff · fluff hlzlr~l relxxt II i~¢ellley, ~oml~ete the Inveltiglth~n Ixk)r tO lubnltllng yogf IDpllcltion Ind Ix·vide 6 colxe$ of
the reporl with thil Ioffn. If · wahrer ~ the reQuirlmentl II grlnttd, 14JINnlt · clX)y ~ ~e waiver wtth inks ton.P,
To determine ~ your proiect Im sut~ect to the 9e(dogic men:Is n~led 8bey· y~ should c~wu,4 the 'Seismic Safety & billy
Elemenl Tlclmk3l Rel~r' wNch ie ·vmMble ·t the Public Inlormltk}n Counter el the Pinning Depar1Nnt.
~ tht Iniwgr tO QNtldM e2 il "Y$1," ¢Qntlct the 81Xxo4xWt· Ge~grephlc Pinning Teem Section to dilcume appropriate
reellute to m/nimix e the h&TartL Inc4xporlt e any mitigation measures Into the Ixotect design prk~ tO sutxnltting the
lion m indicate in the Nace provided below the reSUltS el IRMJf dtsCum llftth thl Pinning Teem
3. ~ymafWeiecticInlltedeseflNttlsllMtNnlbleeeandman:leme? YEBQ NOEl
The Planning Offices In Indio and Riverekle will IxovMe you with information~,~,,-,~,~ming blow·trial hezards. Yo~j ·my also
edlh to aretact the LL& Soil Cormor41ton lervldt '
~ y~uf pmlect is subloci to blow·and haze·e, ·It · blow·and control plmn with the mpplicatie~ (Also refer to S4ct~o~
el Ofdinmnce 460. II your proiect Is· pamel mep or sulxllvtNoN.
4. Is wetef service 8vtlt~be el the Project it·? Y~S ~) NO n
fieNo," how lit must the wlter linl(I) be Ixlendecl to ~ eendce?
Nwnlar el feet or miles
Furlher mnetl~n:
& IseewereeMcoBveneb~mthedto'~ ITBB NOD
N 'No,* how Mr mum U~e wuter tone(e) be extortdeal tO Imw~e merdc~?
Wellletoflldlel
PART IH: Addition!
TMl~lmdngltommmuMbeBMIxRIltBIwlhlNBImm:
1. Nl~llll~e(3};Ir~,..,Vc ;ik4r4.,~-MKmlm'Wtnli oIIhe lxole=lMIo,eeNilefel llk:)loellhe ltlt ~Celorphotogrlphs
8m utlnd. Include ·
· 1TmlmdUonlmmwNch~ctt&h.~&og,d~mtmken
lelieg lM~lt lhe llmJeCl llti. AIiQ mMO lN IIlld el NwID,
I certlfy thlt I lee Invelttgltoe IN {Neltionm In PMI IInd II 8nd N ·ele~s Bm tna 8rid ¢on~ct tOthe best ql~my
Xev:Ln
IDC
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & CONSTi~UCTION
May g, 1989
F~norable Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission
Coun~yAdministrative Center
4080 Lesnn Street, 14t.h Floor
Lt, v~.n~l:14:tm, C-~l~'Poniia 92501
We hereby authorize RANPAC ~qGIN~ING to represent us in all matters coming
before the County regarding the following property:
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUM~R: 921-480-006
Very Truly Yours,
By: IDC (International Construction & Develol~ent)
Reinhold C. ~
C~neral Partner
1202 Kettner Boulevarcl. Suite 4500 · San Diego. California 92101
Fax: (619) 236-0283 · Tet: (619) 236-1771
EXHIBIT I
Although the site is located within a flooding, liquefaction and
Alquist-Priolo Study area, as designated by the County's General
Plan, the 0.78 acre lot in situated on alapproved Tract No.
16178. Recent tract improvements were approved by the County has
mitigate potential liquefaction and flooding hazards.
RiVE=I iDE count,u
-Pl. nnin DEP, aRClTIEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER:
PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(s): PM
APPUCANT'S NAME: (_,~,L~r-c~ kit ~, L/I~t~,r4 INV.
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING
STANDARD EVALUATION
MODULE NUMBER(S): t l
INr_,,
L
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum lot size and uses as applicable): -"'I'T-4.~-
TOTAL PROJECT ARE~ ACRES 'rT~ ; or SQUARE FEET
ASSESSOWS PARCEL NO.(s):
?2/-
D. EXISTING ZONING:
F_ PROPOSED Zt;INING:
F. STREET REFERENCES:
c't:= 2-,~_- i,
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? ~'-'~-~
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
.l~.J,t"f'~'~"Y-...~--'_.- C. IPF.,IJ~.- I,~f-,r~_,,'rf", I,,(r",l-'r,~,,, 1: ""T'
./.
G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
I,.L BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIR~~ Sc'rt'"I'ING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS:
IL COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN 8PACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check ee appmpete opine) bee end I}.:caacf accordingly.
I'1 All or'part of the project site is in 'Adopted Specific Plank" "FIEMAP" or q:llncho Villages Community
Policy Ares". Complete $ectkxm III, N (B end C only), V and VI.
i~M or pert d Ihe IxoJect site is in 'Areas Not DeslgMted as Open Space". Complete Sections III, N
(A, BsndDonly),VBtdVL
r'l M~rpertd~hepr~jec~M~eh~~~n~pen~~~~e~ndC~n~~rv~timde~ign~ti~m~ther~h~~th~seme~tloned
above. Complete Sw:t;ara III, N (A, B, end E only), V end
nl. ENVIRONMENT'N. HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
A, Indiclte ~e nature of the propoeed ind use es cletermined from the N~cdption~ es found in Comprehena~ve General Plan Figu,.
Vt.3 (CirrJe One~ This reformtalon is neceeaery to N~arrnine the N}prc~rt~te lan{I use sultal}illty firings in Section IILB.
NA- Not AI'~Iic-~. CdtY,,Id Ellentill Noffrml-Hlgh Risk ~"Nonnal- Risk
B. Indicate wtth· y~ (Y) or no (N) whether Iny mwltonmeftal hlzerd Incl/or r~ourCe ~ may significanUy affect or be affected
by the proposal. NI referenced figures ere containeel in the Comprehen~ve General ~ For any Lt4ue marked yes (Y) write
m:lcUUcmll data sou _r~'e-_s. Igencies consulted, rmdini~ of ~ end any mit~gltion measures unNr Section V. Also, where indicated,
~ the N~proprime land uee suitability or noise m:ceptabUity raUn~(s). (See ctefirdt~ns It I}ot~om of this page).
HAZARDS
1 ~ Aiquist-Priolo SI)ecii Studie~ or County FluIt 12. h4i__ Airi;ort Noise (Fig. I1.18,5, I1.18.11
Hazard Zones (Fig. VI.1 ) G R- 'Z. ~ J= & VI.12 & 1984 NCUZ Report, M.A.F.B.)
PS U R (Fig. Vt,3) ? qq~A B C D (Fig, VL11)
2, Y ue n ti R~ 13, -
3,_~._ Groundshaking Zone (Fig VL1) ~ r~.~-.~,~ 14. N (Fig. %/I.17 - VL29)
NA (~ PS U R (Fig. Vl,5) 4~ A B C D (Rg, ViA 1 )
4~._~_ Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 'Scale Slope M~os) 15. Other Noise
5..__ Lan{l~lide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale (Fig, %/I.11 )
9~.' W'md Erscmion & Blowsand (Fig. Vt,1,
10, '~ Or~L460, Sec. 14.2 & OKL484)
De b~unc/Uon Are Or~ ~7) ~P-
Seismic Maps or One In~pectk~)
NA $ PS U R (F~. W.6)
Rockfill Hizat~l (On-site Inspection)
bpm~ve Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil r~ v ~
NA A B C D
16. ~ Project Generated Noise Affecting
17.'~
18..,~,,
20. !'J
21. ~1
22, ~,!
23. N
24. ~'
25.
Noise SeMirive Uses {Fig. VI.11)
Noise Sensitive Project (Fig. %/I.11) ___
Air Quiity Impacts From Project '-
Project Sef~sitive to Air Quality
Wlter Qullity Impacts From Project F-'-.' "~
Project Senljtive to Water Quality pp~
I, laza~ou~ Matels and Wastes
i-/zar~ous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VL31 )
Other /-, ,~,..;.-t
RESOURCES
32~J_ Scenic Highway~ (Fig. VL45)
~ Hlstm~ Resources (Re. W32 - VL33)
34,.,1~_' Ar~:hMological Resources
(P,,qe~tl~;~icai Re~up'J~s__ Map~
LOmer
Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
Not AppUca~ 8 - Genreroy ~ PS - Pmvtskx~h/Su.aUe
Generily Unm~able R - Rml~-'led A - Generally Acceptable
Cenditlma!ly keptable C - Generally Unacoeplable D - Land Use Discouraged
LAND USE DETERMINATION
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s):
2. LAND USE PLANNING AREA: ~/r*-~,rn:~f,,,,r~,-'l" .-'("~.J~..rl'c:x~y
3. SUBAREA IF ANY:
4. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IFANY: !~{'1',
5. COMMUNITY PLAN, IF ANY: e ~ '
6. COMMUNrTY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY:
7. SUMMARY OF POUCIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL:
For i!1 projecl$, inklc, ate with a yes CO or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or Mrvices issues may significantly affect
or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are c, ontained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For any baue
fitNed yes (Y), write data 8oume~, agencies consulted, findings of tact, ancl mitjgatio~ measures under SeCtion V.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
1,,_~' Cimultion0r, g.N.1-IV.11. Dieo.~aln ~ lo.,b:L
Sec. V~.Pinr~&Reciuimd Rcse)
BIMTrab(Rg.N.12-N.13)
Fie Seh'ice
8hedff Beryleel ~ N.I? - N.18)
s:ho~ 0qg- N.~7 - N.~8)
~ Waee (Re. N,11, N,18)
I:Wkl end ~-"on (Fig. N.19 - N.20)
1L.~:L
Eques~ Trails (F;. N.19 - N.241
Riv. CA 800 Scale Equestrtan Trail
~ (Fig. N25. N.26)
Limde~ 0r~ N.17 - N.18)
Heelth ~ (Fig. N,17 - N.18)
Aklxx'ts (Fig. ILl&2 - IL18.4.
ILIM - IL18.10 & N.27 - N.36)
17~ Other
1. 81alslhsmlevsntWxiusedelgrsetio~s):
2. B~ed~n~n~n~t~Js~udy~Mthepr~p~ea~c~ns~st~ntw~ththep~ides~rg~c~es~gnNb~fNmppr~pM~NnL
snd theetoe~t wlth the ComWehenm've Geteml Ran? It not. exiNsin:
N. LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued)
D. If ~11 o~ Dm't of the project Nte is in "Areas not Designated as Open Space", end 18 not in a Community Ran, compete
guestjons1, 2, 3, 6 8nd 7. Comptetequestions4,5,6and71fltisinmCommunltyPlan.
Current ~ ~ category(ies) for the ~te based on existing conl:lilions, Also indicate iand use type
3. If D.1 differs Item D.2, will the difference be resolved st the develoixnent stage? Explain:
4. Community Plan desi~naUo~(s):/,,t~IW"~ IN~.,~.-,I'I~'. ,
5, II the propo~ project c~tent wft~ ~ policies and 6eslgnations of the Community Pin?
If not, explain: Y~-~
6. Is the proposal compatible with exiting and Woposed surrounding lane use~?
7. Based on t~s inmaJ st~'y, Is the WOPQC.N Consbleat with the rompaim Genera Rmn?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Nurnbef those issues identifying incon~~ y~/~"
P, II all Qr pert of the project d',e is in an Open Space and C, onMnra~ {le~g~ ~plele the~ving:
'l. Smtet~dedOrmUon(s):
2. k'e~ pK. pQ,~t ~i~e~-,~'~ N desjmmj~s)? if not, expi~
INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND Mrl'IGATION MEASURES
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
~EG'nO~
ISSUE NO.
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION ~
REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED (YES/NO~)ATL=I
Be
For each Sue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and W:B, Identify the Section and issue number and do the
folk)wing, in the format u shown below:,
1, List ell eddiUonal relevant data sources, including agencies consultecl.
2. State ell findings of fact regarding environmental concerns.
3, State specific mitigation measures, ff Iclentiflable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R.)
4, If Illditionll Information 11 required before the environmental uaesament can be completed, refer to
· ~Jble~tion A.
5, If tclcIitional abeeta are needed to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
SECTION/ -
ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MfflGATION MEASURES:
VL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
W/The WoJeCt will not have · ,algainN elfe¢t m IN embonrnent and · Negative Decleati~ may be
I:egamd. .
~ Tho ~ could haw a dgnUkxnt elbct on Iho onvit~kment; however. them ~ not be · signifyant,
effect fn this case I:ecfuee the mltigatJ~ :vansums described in Section V lave been applied to
Ixoject and a NegaUve Decimation may be prepared.
[:] The project may have · dgnlticlnt effect en the mwirmmant and an Environmental impact Repr
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
,1'~p Department of Public Works
DATE:
September 24, 1991
SUBJECT:
Award of Bid - Towne Center Signal - Project #PW91-02
PREPARED BY:
Douglas M. Stewart, Deputy City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve award of bid for construction of a traffic signal at the Towne Center driveway on
Rancho California Road to Steiny & Company for the sum of $80,297.00
BACKGROUND:
On August 20, 1991, the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to advertise
a notice inviting bids for the construction of a traffic signal at the Towne center driveway at
Rancho California Road. The notice requested two (2) alternate bids. Alternate Bid Number 1
required completion of the traffic signal within thirty (30) working days. Alternate Bid
Number 2 required completion within ninety (90) working days. The City reserved the right
to award the alternate bid which, in its sole judgment, was in the City's best interest --
primary considerations being cost and time of completion.
On September 19, 1991 at 4:30 p.m., the bids were publicly opened and reaa. The bids
received were as follows:
BIDDER:
1. William R. Hahn
2. Signal Maintenance Inc.
3. Steiny & Company
BID AMOUNT:
AIt Bid #1:
AIt Bid #2:
No Bid
$77,325.00
AIt Bid #1:
AIt Bid #2:
No Bid
$72,350.00
AIt Bid # 1:
AIt Bid #2:
$80,297.00
$80,297.00
Page 1 of 2 pwOl\agdrpt\O924pwgl .0'2
4. Moore Electrical Cont. AIt Bid #1: S105,000.00
AIt Bid #2: ~90,000.00
5. Sierra Pacific Electrical Cont. AIt Bid #1: S80,576.00
AIt Bid #2: $78,442.00
6. DBX, Inc. AIt Bid #1: $110,000.00
AIt Bid #2: ~70,000.00
Staff recommendation is to award the contract to Steiny & Company for the sum of
~80,297.00, with a completion date within thirty (30) working days. As an alternate, the
Council may wish to consider awarding the contract to DBX, Inc. for the sum of ~70,000.00,
with a completion within ninety (90) working days. Liquidated damages for this contract are
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per calendar day beyond the completion date of the
contract.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A Cooperative Agreement to share in 50% of the cost of the signal and a corresponding
easement document for placement of detectors was submitted to the LandGrant Development
Company in July. Although the executed documents have not been executed and returned
to the City for formal Council action, recent telephone conversations with representatives of
LandGrant have indicated that the documents will be executed and returned to the City in the
near future.
Funds are available in the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 165-5402 for the
construction of this signal.
Page 2 of 2 pwOl\agdrpt\O924pw91.02
ITEM NO. 10
ORDINANCE NO. 91-35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN
THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION
CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 14,
CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A 2 1/2
(RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, 2 1/2 ACRE LOT
SIZE MINIMUM) TO R-A (RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ ROAD AND
SANTIAGO ROAD.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use
district as shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official
Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended
hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of
Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as described
in Change of Zone No. 14 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto
and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. Notice of Adoption, Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City
Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be
posted in at least three public places in the City.
SECTION 3. Taking Effect. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of
its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 241h day of September, 1991.
ATTEST
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Ords 91-35 -1-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 91-35 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of September, 1991, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day
of September, 1991.
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3/Orals 91-35 -2-
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL
MAP NO: LJ
CHANGE OF ZONE NO:
ORDINANCE NO:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
ITEM NO. 11
ORDINANCE NO. 91-36
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN
THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 15
CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A- 2 1/2 TO R-l-1
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WALCOT'F LANE AND
CALLE CHAPOS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 914-300-049
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Public hearing have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use
district as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and ratified as part of the
Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City of Temecula, and the
City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as
described in Change of Zone No. 15 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City
Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
posted in at least three public places in the City.
SECTION 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of
its adoption.
SECTION 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this
Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
3/Ords 91-36 -1 -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 241h day of September, 1991.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 91-36 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of September, 1991, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 241h day
of September, 1991 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3/Ords 91-36 -2-
ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
September 24, 1991
Funding for Temecula Annual Rodeo
Consider request and provide desired staff direction.
This item has been placed on the Council agenda at the
request of Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall.
JSG
Temecuia Town Association
~ep~eTT, b~r 19, 1991
Ci t v oF
43172 Busirte~s Park l)rive
Temec,ala, ~'A 92590
Dear' blark:
As Vo,t are probably aware, l.|te 'I'emect, la Towat Associatio,~ will
be preser~tir,~ the ~eco,d ar~t~,~a]. PRCA l'emec~la Rodeo on
October 2G & 27 at the Teme{',tla Show Gro,tn~ls, fOrtlet' c,C DiRZ
Road and Cherry Street in Temecula.
This is on~ of the ma.ior fund raisers for the Town
A.qso,. iaL ion, a non-profi ~ chart table corporation, abet rooftoy
raiR~,l in ~:,**r' x'ariO,lS ~%~lll S ~O~S back
the form or fact I i ties an,l Rerx'i. ces.
In t~r'.ler' 1.o fit~an~:e the pt'el>arat ton for t!~is year's 1991
Re,tee we are, by this letter', requesting the City to
participate J~y matchin~ Lhe f~nds we raise from
businesses or~ a dollar for dc~llar basis up to a maximum of
$15.000 attd to loan the Town Association an addition $15,000
to be r, aid back at the c'o~clusion of [he Rodeo. nut total
reqt~e-~t. is for' $30,000.
Last year durin~ tile Rodeo we filled all lhe .roteIs in town
and had to send people to Pala tqesa and Lake Elsinore for
addil tonal rooms. We have been told the local restaurants
did more b~siness over those two days than they did all week.
Local merchants also bonefiled from the event Lo varyLn~
de~'ees bRse<t on the commodities they had to offer'.
The Town Association belLeyes these t. ype of evenks offer
solid benefits to our community and the CiLy of Temecula.
We look forward to a favorable response Lo this recluesL.
WiLliam A. llarker
General .~tana~er
P.O. Box 435
Temecula, CA 92593
('14) 6'76-4"18
Fax ('7,.14) 694-9216
Temecula Community Center
28816 Pujol Street
Temecula, CA 92590
TEMECUI,A TOWN ASSOC fAT ION
1991 TEHECUI,A PRO RODEO BUDGET
Category/Descript, ion
INCOME:
At l,endance Admissions
Banner' Sales
Bar' Sales
Dances
Poker Ride
Wine Ride
Sponsors - B,~ck i ng Chtll es
Queen Pageant
Events
T}ckei, s
Pr'it, t. jt~g
ToLal
Hatching Dollars frown Cj.l_y
Loan from C i. t:y
Program Book
Vendors
TO'FAI.~ INCOME
EXPENSES:
Advertising
Awards
Bleachers
Commi ss i otis
Cost of Sales-Poker Ride
Cost of Sales-Wine Ride
Cost of Sales-Queen Pageant
Cost of Sales-Beer & Bar
Donat ions
E]ectric Power
Entertainment
Equipment Rental
Fund Rai set
Insurance
Portable Office Rental,
Telephone at Rodeo Grounds
Portable Toilets
Postage
Printing
Professional/Legal Services
Security
Signs
Site Preparation
Budget
$ 47 000.00
3 000.00
12 000 00
8 000.00
4 000.00
3 500.00
24,850.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
$143,350.00
o 000 O0
7,000 O0
3,000 00
800 00
2 000 00
1 000 00
5 850 00
14 000 00
I 000 00
12 000 00
2 000 00
2 000 00
3 500 00
3 000 00
500 00
300 00
1,500 00
300 00
500 00
6,.460 00
3,500 00
1,000 00
17,500 00
-more-
1991 Pro Rodeo Budget P~. 2
Category/Description
Budget
Trash Cleanup
Vendor Set~p
Work Parties
Loan from City - Repayment
Contingency
TOTAL EXPENSES
1,500.00
300.00
500.00
15.000.00
2,500.00
$110,510.00
NET PROFIT
$ 32,840.00
Footnote: (1) To date the Temecula Town Association has
expended $15,500.00 and taken in $15,000.00
for'the Rodeo.
An advance payment of $6,000.00 had to be
made to the Professional Rodeo Cowboys
Association in order to secure their sanction.
(3) The Temecula Town Association's cash flow has
been adversely affected by the fire that
destroyed the community center building last
December.
(4) The estimated income to the City of Temecula
businesses during the three day event this year
is between $50,000 and $75,000.
These are the reasons the Town Association is seeking the
City's participation at this time.
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 435
Temecula, CA 92593
RODEO TRIVIA
There is no recorded date documenting when the first Rodeo
was held but it was no doubt a friendly competition between
cowboys who worked the early western ranches who wished to
demonstrate their skills at calf roping and breaking wild
horses.
Over the years the sport became popular among ranchers add
their hired hands and impromptu events were held for' their
own fun and enjoyment of surrounding towns people. As the
west was settled more people attended these events and it
soon became a popular form of entertainment.
EvenLua]ly the sport began aLLract. ing self proclaimed exper|.
performers and other activities were added such as bull
riding, Leani roping, calf tying, barrel racing, etc. Rodeos
began appearing in some unlikely places like Madison Square
Garden where the wild west sport could be observed by city
dwellers.
By this time maxmy of the performers |lad become pz'ofessionals
who travelled a circuit for the prize morley offered. As
prize money mounted the performers saw the need of organizing
for their own protection and in 1936 the Professional Rodeo
Cowboys Association (PRCA} was formed fox' tile purpose of
controlling the quality of the events arid improving the
safety of the performers as well as sanctioning national
events. Top performers are now pulling in six figure annual
earnings.
Once the domain of men only, today's Rodeos also include
women competitors who participate in barrel racing, trick
riding, etc,
Over the years Rodeos |lave attracted national sponsors among
whom are: Bull's-Eye Barbecue Sauce, Coca-Cola, Coors Brewing
Company, Copenhagen/Skoal, Resistol Hats, Wrangler Jeans,
Purina Mills, and on and on.
The Town Association's Temecula Rodeo is PRCA sanctioned and
timing of our event is ideal since it is .just two weeks pPior
to the nationals. This ,leans we get the top performers alad
stock all who are working to gain the best st. andings before
entering the fi na] s.
Today, Rodeos are the fastest growing spectator sport in
America and are also held .ira Canada and Australia. Some
Rodeos have been perforined in the Orient and Europe.
TEHECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 435
Temecula, CA 92593
THE RODEO QUEEN
Each year some lucky young lady earns the title of National
Rodeo Queen. Like other similar beauty pageants, the girls
work their way up the ladder by first competing in local
events, then regional and state events leading up to the
finals where the National Queen is chosen.
This is not just a beauty contest, the girls must be expert
horse riders as well and must demonstrate their skills in the
various contests they enter.
This year, for the first time, the Town Association is
holding a Miss Temecula Rodeo Queen contest. Thirteen pretty
and talented young ladles have entered the Temecula contest
and we are hopeful that one of them will go on to bigger and
better things at the state, arid hopefully, the national
everit.
The Miss Temecula Rodeo Queen contest will be held on October
12, and everyone is invited to attend and watch the girls
perform. They will be demonstrating their horsemanship
during the afternoon at the Rodeo Arena and that evening will
be participating in the Pageant at Murrieta Hot Springs
Resort. More information will be forthcoming on this.
C
a'o nia
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
I, MARCH FONG EU, Secretary of State of the State
of California, hereby certify:
That the annexed transcript has been compared with
the record on file in this office, of which it purports to be
a copy, and that same is full, true and correct.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute
this certificate and affix the Great
Seal of the State of California this
AUG 3 1 1984
Secretar~ of State
SEC/STATE FO, m CE-v o? ~,~::~ ~ ~
-NDORSED
FILED
office of the Secretary of
Of the State of Cal|forni~
AUG 9 1984
FONG EU, Secretary of Stalin
d~MES E. HARRIS'
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
Duane A. Balfanz, President and Patricia J. Patton,
Secretary cert,ify:
1. That we are the President and the Secretary, respectively
of Temecula Town AssOciation, a California corporation.
2. That the Articles of Incorporation of Temecula Town Asso-
ciation shall be amended to read as hereinafter set forth in full:
AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
%
The name of the corporation is Temecula Town Association.
II. PURPOSES
This cor~ration is a nonprofit public benefit corporation
and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is
organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for
public and charitable purposes. The public and charitable pur-
poses of the corporation are to operate a nonprofit organization
for the preservation and maintenance of the town site of "Temecula",
the restoration and maintenance of the town site of "Temecula" and
to provide for the entire co~nunity, a community center and other
community facilities and services.
- 1 -
III. ELECTION OF CORPORATION
This corporation elects to be governed by all of the pro-
visions of the Nonprofit Corporation Law effective January 1, 1980,
not otherwise applicable to it under Part 5 thereof.
IV. DIRECTORS
That the number of Directors of this Corporation shall be
seven (7) and the names and addresses of the persons who are
appointed to act in the capacity of Directors until the selection
of their successors are as follows:
R. J. REININGER
ROBERT W. MAJESKI
BUD SCHROEDER
NELDA F. MAJESKI
DON J. ANDERSON
LEROY E. WOLVERTON
JACK A. BUCK
P.O. Box 326
P.O. Box 192
P.O. Box 126
P.O. Box 192
P.O. Box 254
P.O. Box 13
P.O. Box 831
Temecula, California
Temecula, California
Temecula, California
Temecula, California
Temecula, Californxa
Temecula, California
Temecula, Californxa
V. BYLAW PROVISIONS
(.a) Directors. The manner in which Directors shall be chosen
and removed from office, their qualifications, power, duties, com-
pensation, and tenure of office, the manner of filling vacancies
on the Board, and the manner of calling and holding meetings of
Directors, shall be as stated in the Bylaws.
(b) Members. The authorized number, if any, and qualifications
of ~embers of the corporation, the filling of vacancies, the dif-
ferent classes of membership, if any, the property, voting, and
other rights and privileges of members, and their liability to dues
and assessments and the method of collection, and the termination
and transfer of membership shall be as stated in the Bylaws.
VI. DEDICATION AND DISSOLUTION
(a) The property of this corporation is irrevocably dedicated
to public and charitable purposes and no part of the net income or
assets of this organization shall ever inure to the benefit of any
director, officer, or member thereof, or to the benefit of any pri-
vate persons.
- 2 -
(b) On the dissolution or winding up of the corporation, its
assets remaining after payment of, or provision for payment of,
all debts and liabilities of this corporation shall be distributed
to a nonprofit fund, foundation, or corporation which is organized
and operated exclusively for charitable purposes and which has es-
tablished its tax-exempt status under Internal Revenue Code Section
501(c)(3).
(c) If this ~orpofation holds any assets on trust, or the
corporation is formed for charitable purposes, such assets shall
be disposed of in such manner as may be directed by decree of the
superior court of the county in which the corporation has its prin-
cipal office, on petition therefor by the Attorney General or by
any person concerned in the liquidation, in a proceeding to which
the Attorney General is a party.
VII.
CHARITABLE PURPOSE
This corporation is
poses within the meining
enue Code of 1954.
organized exclusively for charitable put-
of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev-
Notwithstanding any other provision of these articles, the
corporation shall not carry on any other activities not permitted
to be carried on by (a) a corporation exempt from Federal Income
Tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal. Revenue Code of 1954
(or the corresponding provision of any future United States In-
ternal Revenue law) or (b) by a corporation, contributions to
which are deductible under Section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding provision of any future
United States Internal Revenue Law.)
VIII. LIMITATION ON CORPORATE ACTIVITIES
No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall
consist of the carrying on of propoganda, or otherwise attempting to
influence legislation, nor shall this corporation participate or in-
tervene in any political campaign (including publishing or distribu-
tion of statements) on behalf of any candidate for public office.
3. That the amendment has been approved by the Board of Directors
and the required vote of the members.
E A. BAL~'AN~ P~S~de~'AN
RICIA J~/PATTON, Secretary
- 3 -
Declaration
Each of the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that
the statements contained in the foregoing Certificate of Amendment
of Articles of Incorporation are true of his or her own knowledge
and that this declaration was executed on July 27, 1984, at
Temecula, California.
PAeta
%%
- 4 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95867
',rch q, 1985
Temecula Toun Association
p. O.Box
Temecula, CA 92390
In reply re~er to
3q2:APP=KY=dh~g
Purpose ~ Charitable
Form o~ Organization : Corporation
Ac¢oux~ting Ferlod Ending: December 31
Organization Number : 0596418
On the has-is o~ the information submitted and provided your present
operations continue unchanged or conform to those proposed in your
application, you are exempt ~rom state ~ranchise or income tax under
Section 23701d, Revenue and Taxation Code. Any change in operation,
character or purpose o~ the-organization must b~ reported immediately
to this o~ice so that we may determine the e~ect on your exempt
status. Any change o~ name or address also must be reported.
You are required to {ile Form 199 (Exempt Organization Annual
Information Return) or Form 199B (Exempt Organization Annual
' [ormation Statement) on or before the 15th day of the 5th month
I months) a~ter the close of your accounting period. See annual
instru&tions with ~orms ~or requirements.
You ere not required to ~ile state ~ranchise or income tax returns
unless you have income subject to the unrelated business income tax
under SeCtion 23731 o~ the Code. In this event, you are required to
~ile Form 109 (Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return) by the
15th day o~ the 5th month (4 1/2 months) a~ter the close o~ your
annual accounting period.
the organization is incorporating, this approval uill expire unless
incorporatioh is completed uith the Secretary o~ State within 60 days.
Exemption ~rom ~ederal income or other taxes and other sta~e taxes
requires separate applications.
COPY
arch q, 1985
Temecula Town Association
Corporate Number 0596q18
Page 2
This exemption is granted on the express condition that the
organization will secure ~ederal exempt status with the Internal
Revenue Service. The organization is required to ~urnish a cbpy
the ~inal determination letter to the Franchise Tax Board ~ithin
months from the date of this letter.
This exemption e~ective as o~ February 5, lgBq.
D. Hareid, Supervisor
Central Audit Section
Telephone (800) 852-5711
Pa~ricia H. Birdsall
Registrar o~ Charitable Trusts
COPY
· .XNTERNN.. REVENUE SERVICE
DIBTRICT DIRECTOR
P 0 BOX 2350 ROON 5127 ATTN: E.O.
L06 ANGELESt CA 900532350
Date: JAN. 9~ 1991
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOC]ATXON
P 0 BOX 435
TEMECULA, CA 92390
DEPARTRENT OF THE TREABURY
EMployer Identification NuMber:
95-3741422
Case NuMber:
950339042
Contact Person:
JOSEPH CUNHA
Contact Telephone NuMber:
(213) 694-4170
Our Letter Dated:
NoveMber 1965
AddendeM Applies:
none
Dear Applicant:
This Modifies our letter of the above date in which we stated that you
would be treated as an o~ganization which is not a private foundation until
the expiration of your advance ruling period.
Your exempt status under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an
organization described in section 501(c)(3) is st111 in effect. Based on the
information you submitted, we have determined that you are not a private
foundation withtn the Meaning of sectton 509(a) of the code because you are an
organization of the type described in section 509(a)(2).
Grantors and contributors nay rely on this determination unless the
Internal Revenue Service publishes notice to the contrary. However~ if you
lose your section 509(a)(2) status, a grantor or contributor may.
not rely on this determination if he or she was in part responsible for, or
was aware of, the act or failure to act, or the substantial or Raterio1
change on the part ofthe organization that resulted in your loss of such
status, or if he or she acquired knowledge that the Internal Revenue Service
had given notice that you would no longer be classified as a section
509(a)(2) organization.
Xf we have indicated in the heading of this letter that an addenduM
applies~ the addenduR enclosed is an tntegral part of this letter.
Because this letter could he]p resolve any questions about your private
foundation status~ please keep It In your permanent records.
Zf you have any questionst please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown above.
Nichael J. Ouinn
Letter I050(CG)
ITEM NO. 13
CITY ATTORNEY-
FINANCE OFFICE~~
CITY MANAGER'
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council
Joe Hreha, Senior Management Analyst~,,~~_j/~~'~'''j
September 24, 1991
SUBJECT:
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT GRANDFATHER REGULATIONS
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution:
establishing solid waste management regulations for
grandfathered haulers,
providing similar treatment for franchised and
grandfathered haulers, and
regulating a grandfathered haulers' expansion and
service components.
DISCUSSION: Currently, this City has one solid waste franchised hauler
(Temecula Environmental) and two grandfathered haulers (Waste Management of Inland
Valley and Jess Rodriguez). The proposed Resolution establishes solid waste regulations
for grandfathered haulers that are 'similar to Temecula Environmental's franchise
agreement. This recommended action will create similar treatment for franchised and
grandfathered haulers.
Additionally, the proposed action regulates the customer
expansion of and the service components, e.g., single family residential, commercial, etc.,
provided by grandfathered haulers. The purpose, spirit, and intent of the five year
grandfather provision, contained in the Public Resources Code, guarantees grandfathered
-haulers the necessary time to amortize their existing equipment and slowly reduce their
service components, where they have been officially notified to cease all solid waste
services. Furthermore, the proposed action restricts grandfathered haulers from
reentering solid waste service components that have been voluntarily discontinued. Jess
Rodriguez had approximately six customers in the City. When he was contacted and
asked if he was planning to continue to offer solid waste management services in the
City, he stated that by being grandfathered, that he was discontinuing all services. He
failed to apply for a 1991 solid waste permit. Waste Management of Inland Valley has
officially stated, in writing, that they intend to continue to provide and expand their
commercial, multi-family residential, industrial, and construction service components,
while discontinuing all single family residential services. Without these regulations and
managed customer expansion and service components:
the City's ability to comply with AB 939 could
be jeopardized;
the City's ability to enforce the franchised
haulers' AB 939 indemnification and solid waste
management responsibilities could be difficult;
grandfathered haulers would enjoy a significant
competitive edge over the City's franchised
hauler, which could result in customer rate
increases to offset the edge;
grandfathered haulers could independently elect
to provide services in only the most profitable
markets and therefore disadvantage the
franchised hauler;
the City's solid waste management program and
data gathering could be more complicated;
the City's ability to make future changes to the
solid waste franchise, Ordinance, Resolution,
and program could become complex;
the City's public education program and material
costs that cannot be standardized will cause
confusion and increase costs; and
the purpose, spirit, and intent of the solid waste
grandfather provision of the Public Resources
Code will be circumvented.
Finally, if this action is approved, Jess Rodriguez may not
reenter and provide solid waste services in the City. Waste Management of Inland Valley
will be required to adhere to the solid waste management regulations that equally apply
to the City's franchised hauler. Waste Management of Inland Valley will also be restricted
from increasing the number of their customers and the service components in order to
allow them the necessary time to amortize their existing equipment and begin their
transition to discontinue all services in the City. If a specific service component is
voluntarily abandoned, i.e., single family residential homes, Waste Management of Inland
Valley may not reenter this service component at a later date.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 9 1 -
sff\ll0819.RES
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING
REGULATIONS GOVERNING SOLID WASTE
DISPOSAL BY GRANDFATHERED WASTE HAULERS
WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS·
finds and declares that:
The City of Temecula hereby
(1) Prior to incorporation, the area which is
now the City of Temecula was receiving solid waste disposal
services from private haulers issued permits by the County
of Riverside.
(2) The permits issued by the County of
Riverside to said private haulers were and are governed by
County Ordinance No. 657 which reads in pertinent part:
"Section 6.
Revocation of Permits. A permit may be
revoked or suspended by the Board of
Supervisors whenever the permittee has
violated a material provision of this
ordinance, or State rules or regulations,, or
is in non-compliance with a resolution of the
Board of Supervisors or for failure of
performance as defined in Section 7...
Section 7.
J. Failure to Perform.
Permittee shall be deemed to have failed to
perform in the following circumstances:
a. Failure to provide the service
indicated;
-1-
sff\ll0819.RES
c. Failure to comply with the terms of this
ordinance, a county resolution, state or
federal law ..."
(3) On December 1, 1989 the City of Temecula
became a duly incorporated city within the State of
California, with the City Council assuming all jurisdiction
from the Board of Supervisors over solid waste hauler
permits;
(4) The State of California has provided
cities with the authority to provide for the adequate
collection and disposal of solid waste within their
respective jurisdictions upon incorporation including the
authority to adopt and enforce regulations therefor;
(5) That the City of Temecula adopted
Ordinance 90-27 establishing regulations governing
integrated waste management now codified in the Temecula
Municipal Code as Chapter 6.10.
(6) Sections 49520 and 49521 of the Public
Resources Code of the State of California provides that
where a local agency has authorized by permit a solid waste
enterprise to provide solid waste handling and these
services have been furnished for more than three years, said
enterprise may continue service for an additional five
years after notification that an exclusive franchise is to
be authorized, provided that:
1. The services of the solid waste handler are in
substantial compliance with the terms and conditions of
the solid waste permit;
2. The services meet the quality and frequency of
services required of other haulers operating within the
City;
3. The rates charged by the enterprise may be
periodically reviewed and set by the local agency.
(7) The City of Temecula has set forth,
pursuant to Section 6.10,205 of the Temecula Municipal Code,
rules governing the manner, time, and frequency of
collection to be provided within the City.
(8) The City of Temecula is, by authority of
Section 6.10.200 of the Temecula Municipal Code, permitted
to determine the means by which integrated waste management
services shall be furnished.
-2-
sff\ll0819.RES
(9) The City of Temecula has granted an
exclusive franchise to CR&R Incorporated dba Temecula
Environmental effective May 28, 1991 and has complied with
the notice requirements contained in the applicable sections
of the Public Resources Code for discontinuing the services
of previously permitted haulers.
(10) All private haulers or solid waste
enterprises other than CR&R dba Temecula Environmental are
now operating in the City of Temecula pursuant to Section
49520 of the Public Resources Code and operate within the
City subject to the conditions as set forth in Section 49521
of the same.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. The following meanings apply
for purposes of this resolution unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise:
Grandfathered Hauler: A "grandfathered hauler" means
any hauler or collector, other than the holder of a
franchise or permit issued by the City, who is
providing services under the authority of Public
Resources Code Section 49520 and is licensed pursuant
to this Resolution.
SECTION 3. AUTHORITY. Authority to regulate solid
waste collection service by Grandfathered haulers is
provided by Section 49521 of the Public Resources Code of
the State of California.
SECTION 4. LICENSING. All grandfathered haulers
operating within the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula
must be licensed by the City. Said license shall be issued
by the City for a period not to exceed one (1) calendar
year. The license shall set forth the following:
(1) Terms. The license shall be subject to the
terms and conditions governing the manner, time, and
frequency of solid waste collection and disposal as set
forth in Chapter 6.10 of the Municipal Code and in the
Regulations attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) Scope of Service. The license may set forth
in detail either the specific parcels and/or accounts
which may be serviced or may set forth the specific
boundaries of the area to be serviced.
-3-
sff\llO819.RES
(3) Fees. The license shall set forth the fee to
be paid to the City for the duration of the license.
Said fee shall be not less than eight percent (8%) of
gross revenues.
SCOPE OF SERVICE.
(1) No right to expand service. No Grandfathered
Hauler shall serve any parcel and/or accounts not
already served by the Hauler when it was first notified
to discontinue service pursuant to Section 49520.
Further, a Grandfathered Hauler may only provide
service to those individual parcels and/or accounts it
was providing service to at the time it was issued the
license. Notwithstanding the above, if the
Grandfathered Hauler loses a parcel and/or account, it
may serve a new and equivalent parcel and/or account.
(2) Discontinuation of Service. Discontinuation of
service to either any category of service (commercial,
single-family residential, multi-family, etc.)
regardless of intent to resume, for greater than 30
days shall result in the Grandfathered Hauler losing
any right to subsequently offer that category of
service.
MECTIOM 6. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION. Any license
issued to a Grandfathered Hauler may be suspended or revoked
at the discretion of the City Council for failure by any
hauler to substantially comply with any of the terms and
conditions regulating service as set forth in the license,
this resolution, Chapter 6.10 of the Temecula Municipal
Code, or any State or Federal law shall be grounds for
suspension or revocation of said license.
SECTION 7. NOTICE. Upon determination that the
provisions of this section apply to a given hauler, the City
Manager or his designee shall send notice regarding
suspension or revocation to the Grandfathered Hauler by
United States Mail, return receipt requested. The notice
provided for in this Section shall state the type and area
of service to be abated along with the effective date of
abatement.
-4-
sff\ll0819.RES
SECTION 8. FINALITY. The notice of suspension or
revocation shall be deemed a final action by the City.
SECTION 9. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby
declares that the provisions of this Resolution are
severable and if for any reason a court of competent
jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section
of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining parts of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 10. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall
certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of
September, 1991.
RON PARKS
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly
adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the 24th day of September,
1991 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
-5-
REGULATIONS FOR THE COLLECTION,
TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING, AND
DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION
DEBRIS BY HAULERS LICENSED PURSUANT TO PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE SECTION 49520, SECTIONS 6.10.200
AND 6.10.205 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
SECTION 1.
DEFINITIONS.
Whenever any term used in these Regulations has been defined by Chapter
6.10 of the Temecula Municipal Code or Division 30, Pan 1, Chapter 2 of the
California Public Resources Code, the definitions in the Municipal Code or Public
Resources Code shall apply unless the term is otherwise defined in these Regulations.
A. AB 939.
"AB 939" shall mean the California Integrated Waste Management Act
of 1989, as it may be amended from time to time.
B. Bins.
"Bins" shall mean those containers provided by Hauler for commercial,
industrial, construction, and multi-family residential uses. Bins are of
two types: (i) Bins which are picked up by refuse trucks by means of
front loading apparatus; and (ii) Rolloff Bins which are picked up by
trucks using rear loading winches onto rails.
C. City Limits.
De
"City Limits" means the boundaries of the City together with all
amendments and changes thereto, which boundaries are shown by maps
incorporated herein by reference and which are on file in the office of
the City Clerk of the City Council.
Hauler.
"Hauler" means a person, persons, local agency, firm, contractor, or
corporation licensed to provide for the collection, transportation,
recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction
debris within the City pursuant to Section 49520 of the Public Resources
Code and City Resolution No. 91-__.
E. Special Wastes.
"Special Wastes" shall mean all the items and materials which are set
forth on Exhibit "B," "Special Wastes."
SECTION 2.
LICENSE.
Every January 1, haulers shall obtain a license to provide solid waste
collection, transportation, recycling, cornposting, and disposal of solid waste and
construction debris services within City. The form of the license application and the
license shall be established by the City Manager or his designee.
SECTION 3.
SERVICE AREA.
A. Service Area Defined. The Service Area authorized by these
Regulations shall be all residential, commercial, industrial, and construction premises
served by the hauler as of July 1, 1991, subject to reduction pursuant to Section 5 of
City Resolution 91-__.
B. Annexation Covered by Existing Franchise. Territory annexed to the
City that is covered by an existing solid waste or construction debris permit, license,
agreement, or franchise granted by another public entity may continue to be served by
the same hauler for the balance of the term of its permit, license, agreement, or
franchise, subject to the provisions of Chapter 6.10, and the provisions of these
Regulations or five (5) years from the date of annexation, whichever is less.
SECTION 4.
SERVICES PROVIDED BY HAULER.
A. General. Hauler shall provide the collection, transportation, recycling,
composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and provide
temporary bin/rolloff services within the Service Area in accordance with the terms of
these Regulations and Chapter 6.10.
B. Single Family Residential.
(1) Weekly Service. Once each week Hauler shall collect the solid
waste, compostables, and recyclables (except bulky items and household
hazardous waste) which have been placed, kept, or accumulated in
containers at single family residences that have contracted for Hauler's
service. All solid waste, compostables, and recyclables must be placed
within containers curbside without obstructions so as to permit
collection. Hauler shall establish a normal weekly collection time.
Hauler may negotiate special pickup procedures, above and beyond the
normal services described above, with customers for an additional fee in
an amount provided in Exhibit "D."
(2) Bulky Item and Household Hazardous Waste Services. Twice
during each calendar year, every residential customer receiving container
service by the Hauler shall be provided, by the Hauler, a bulky item
pickup (maximum of two items per pickup) which have been placed at
curbside in residential areas within the Service Area, e.g., refrigerator,
washer and dryer, sofa, etc. Hauler may provide temporary bin/rolloff
services to customers for numerous items from annual cleanups, moving,
extensive yard work, minor construction projects, etc. Residents shall
be required to provide the Hauler with a seven day notice requesting this
bulky item service. Hauler shall be responsible with recording
residential bulky item pickup requests. Bulky item pickups exceeding
the two per calendar year per residential container customer shall be
charged an additional fee in an amount provided in Exhibit "D."
Semiannually, on dates designated by City as "Residential Household
Hazardous Waste Roundup Day," Hauler shall conduct a residential
household hazardous waste roundup at a central location designated by
the City, if hauler is providing single family residential services. Hauler
shall accept only those non-permit required household hazardous wastes
that are all recyclable, i.e. to date, waste oil, water base paint,
antifreeze, and lead/acid batteries. Therefore, no disposal fees shall be
incurred and as such, charged to the City. Hauler agrees to prepare all
applications and manifests and to obtain all necessary approvals. City
shall not be designated as the generator. Semiannually, the County of
Riverside shall provide a Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Program designed to collect not only non-permit required household
hazardous wastes but also permit required household hazardous wastes,
e.g., pesticicles, herbicides, oil base paint, etc. These County and
Hauler roundups should be coordinated in an effort to provide all
residents with non-permit required roundups once each calendar quarter,
or more, and permit required roundups semiannually. Hauler shall
produce, keep current, and provide public education materials
specifically outlining the bulky item pickups and household hazardous
waste roundups.
C. Commercial, Industrial, and Multi-Family Residential.
(1) Multi-Family Weekly Service. Not less often than once per
week, and more frequently if required to handle the waste stream of the
premises where the bins are located, Hauler shall collect the solid waste
(including bulky items which have been placed in a closed bin),
compostables, and recyclables (except household hazardous waste) from
multi-family premises which have contracted for Hauler's services.
(2) Bulky Item and Household Hazardous Waste Services. Hauler
shall provide bulky item services to multi-family residences as described
in 5C(1) above; however, special consideration shall be provided by
Hauler for those bulky items that are impractical and unreasonable to
place in a bin. Hauler shall coordinate with individual property
managers of multi-family residences to effect the bulky item services
(maximum of four items per resident per calendar year) to the respective
residents of the complex. The same household hazardous waste services
provided, pursuant to Section 5B(2) above for container service
residences, shall be made available to all multi-family residents in the
Service Area, coordinating with individual property managers to effect
the service to the respective residents of the complex served.
(3) Commercial and Industrial Weekly Service. Not less often than
once per week, and more frequently if required to handle the waste
stream of the premises where the bins are located, Hauler shall collect
the solid waste, compostables, and recyclables from commercial and
industrial premises which have contracted for Hauler's service.
(4) Hauler shall conduct a waste audit of all contracted commercial
and multi-family accounts received after October 1, 1991, to determine
their recyclable content, prior to services being rendered. The process
used to conduct this waste audit shall be shared with the City of
Temecula and the County to ensure permit compliance and acceptance.
Those accounts that contain a significant recyclable content shall be
processed through a Recycling Processing Center that currently processes
salvaged separated materials for reuse. Customers achieving this
content, or higher, shall only be charged the service rates that appear in
Exhibit "D, " paragraph D 5. Those accounts that do not satisfy the
content level, shall have their waste stream disposed of at the landfill and
shall only be charged the service rates that appear in Exhibit "D, " ,
paragraph D 5. However, if these customers desire to commence a
source separated recycling program, a recycling container shall be
provided by Hauler and customers shall be charged the additional service
rates reflected in Exhibit "D," paragraph D 6. Once Hauler's or an
appropriate recovery facility is operational to accept the entire waste
stream, customers shall only be charged the service rates reflected in
Exhibit "D,'° paragraph D 5, and the source separated recycling rates in
Exhibit "D," paragraph D 6 will become a customer option.
D. Construction and Temporary Bin/Rolloff Services. Hauler may provide
construction and temporary bin/rolloff services using rates reflected in Exhibit "D."
E. Recycling Program. The Hauler shall provide recycling services in the
Service Area in accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit "C", and the rates set
forth in Exhibit "D."
F. Special Wastes. Hauler may, but is not required to, provide such
collection, transportation, and disposal services for special wastes. Hauler may
provide such services for special wastes if contracted to do so by customers under
separate written contracts negotiated between Hauler and the customer generating such
special wastes. A .schedule of fees for these special waste services shall be approved
by the City Manager.
SECTION 5.
LICENSE FEES.
A License Fee of eight percent (8%) of the Hauler's Gross Revenues, less
land fill fees, shall be payable by Hauler to City 30 days after the close of each
quarter of the Hauler's fiscal year.
SECTION 6. LETTER OF CREDIT: INSURANCE COVERAGE.
A. Cash Bond. Within thirty (30) days of adoption of these Regulations, the
Hauler shall deposit a cash bond in the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) in
5
an interest bearing account. The cash bond shall be on terms acceptable to the City
Attorney. The cash bond shall serve as security for the faithful performance by
Hauler of all the provisions and obligations of these Regulations.
(1) After thirty (30) days following Hauler's failure to pay the City
an amount owing under these Regulations, the cash bond may be
assessed by the City upon five (5) days prior written notice to the Hauler
for purposes including, but not limited to:
(a) Failure of Hauler to pay the City sums due under the
terms of these Regulations.
(b) Reimbursement of costs borne by the City to correct
Regulation violations not corrected by Hauler, after due notice.
(c) Monetary remedies or damages assessed against Hauler
due to breach of these Regulations.
(2) The Hauler shall deposit a sum of money sufficient to restore the
cash bond to the original amount within thirty (30) days after notice from
the City that any amount has been withdrawn from the cash bond.
B. Insurance Coverage. Contemporaneously with the execution of these
Regulations, the Hauler shall deposit copies of insurance policies or endorsements
evidencing the existence of policies of insurance required pursuant to these
Regulations.
SECTION 7. TERM.
Haulers shall cease to provide all solid waste services upon expiration of the
grandfathered period of five years, as provided under Public Resources Code Section
49520.
SECTION 8. LICENSE TRANSFERRABLE: CITY CONSENT REQUIRED
A. The license authorized by these Regulations shall not be transferred,
6
sold, hypothecated, sublet, or assigned, nor shall any of the rights or privileges herein
be hypothecated, leased, assigned, sold, or transferred, either in whole or in part, nor
shall title thereto, either legal or equitable, or any right, interest, or property therein,
pass to or vest in any person, except the Hauler, either by act of the Hauler or by
operation of law, without the prior written consent of the City expressed by
Resolution. Any attempt by Hauler to assign this license without the consent of City
shall be void.
B. If the Hauler attempts to transfer the license prior to obtaining City
consent, all of the profits or twenty-five percent (25%) of the Gross Revenues, from
the date of attempted transfer until the date of City consent, whichever is greater,
shall be returned to the customers on a pro rata basis.
C. The City shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to a transfer of the
license authorized by these Regulations. The City may impose conditions of approval
on a license transfer, including, but not limited to the payment of a license transfer
fee to the City.
D. City consent is required for any change in control of Hauler. "Change
in control" shall mean any sale, transfer, or acquisition of Hauler. Hauler is a
corporation, and any acquisition of more than ten percent (10%) of Hauler's voting
stock by a person, or group of persons acting in concert, who already owns less than
50% of the voting stock, shall be deemed a change in control.
E. Any change in control of the Hauler occurring without prior City
approval shall constitute a material breach of these Regulations.
SECTION 9.
LICENSE TRANSFER: FEES.
A. Any application for a license transfer shall be made in a manner
prescribed by the City Manager. The application shall include a license transfer fee
in an amount to be set by City by a Resolution of the Council, to cover the cost of all
direct and indirect administrative expenses including consultants and attorneys,
necessary to adequately analyze the application and to reimburse City for all direct
and indirect expenses. In addition, the Hauler shall reimburse the City for all costs
not covered by the license transfer fee. Bills shall be supported with evidence of the
expense or cost incurred. The applicant shall pay such bills within thirty (30) days of
receipt.
B. These license transfer fees are over and above any additional license fees
specified in these Regulations.
SECTION 10. IMPOSITION OF DAMAGES OR TERMINATION
A. If the City Manager determines that the Hauler's performance pursuant
to these Regulations has not been in conformity with reasonable industry standards
which are obtained in similar cities in Southern California, the provisions of these
Regulations, the requirements of Chapter 6.10, the requirements of the California
Integrated Waste Management Board, including, but not limited to, requirements for
source reduction and recycling (as to the waste stream subject to these Regulations) or
any other applicable Federal, State, or local law or regulation, including but not
limited to the laws governing transfer, storage, or disposal of special wastes, the City
Manager may advise Hauler in writing of such deficiencies. The Manager may, in
such written instrument, set a reasonable time within which correction of all such
deficiencies is to be made. The City Manager shall review the Hauler's response and
refer the matter to the City Council or decide the matter and notify the Hauler of that
decision, in writing. A decision or order of the City Manager shall be final and
binding on Hauler if the Hauler falls to file a "Notice of Appeal" with the City
Manager within 30 days of receipt of the City Manager's decision. Within ten
working days of receipt of a Notice of Appeal, the City Manager shall either refer the
appeal to the City Council for proceedings in accordance with Section 10C-D, below.
B. The City Council, in such case, may set the matter for hearing or refer
the matter to a hearing officer pursuant to Section 11. The City Council shall give
Hauler, and any other person requesting the same, fourteen (14) days written notice
of the time and place of the hearing. At the hearing, the City Council shall consider
the report of the City Manager indicating the deficiencies, and shall give the Hauler,
or its representatives and any other interested person, a reasonable opportunity to be
heard.
C. Based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Council shall
determine by Resolution whether the license should be terminated or a penalty
imposed. If, based upon the record, the City Council determines that the
performance of Hauler is in breach of any material term of these Regulations or any
material provision of any applicable Federal, State, or local statute or regulation, the
City Council, in the exercise of its sole discretion, may terminate the license forthwith
or impose a penalty, as defined below. The decision of the City Council shall be
final and conclusive, subject to referral of the matter for an administrative hearing
pursuant to Section 11, below. Hauler's performance under its license is not excused
during the period of time prior to the City Council's final determination as to whether
such performance is deficient.
D. This fight of termination or to impose a penalty is in addition to any
other fights of City upon a failure of Hauler to perform its obligations under these
Regulations.
E. The City further reserves the right to terminate Hauler's license or
impose a penalty in the event of any of the following:
(1) If the Hauler practices, or attempts to practice, any fraud or
deceit upon the City.
(2) If the Hauler becomes insolvent, unable, or unwilling to pay its
debts, or upon listing of an order for relief in favor of Hauler in a
bankruptcy proceeding.
(3) If the Hauler falls to provide or maintain in full force and effect,
the workers' compensation, liability, indemnification coverage, or cash
bond as required by these Regulations.
(4) If the Hauler willfully violates any orders or rulings of any
regulatory body having jurisdiction over the Hauler relative to these
Regulations, provided that the Hauler may contest any such orders or
rulings by appropriate proceedings conducted in good faith, in which
case no breach of these Regulations shall be deemed to have occurred.
(5) If the Hauler ceases to provide collection services for a period of
seven (7) days or more, for any reason within the control of the Hauler.
(6) If the Hauler willfully falls to make any payments required under
these Regulations and/or refuses to provide City with required
information, reports, and/or test results in a timely manner as provided
in these Regulations.
(7) Any other act or omission by the Hauler which materially violates
the terms, conditions, or requirements of these Regulations, Chapter
6.10, the Califomia Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, as it
may be amended from time to time or any order, directive, rule, or
regulation issued thereunder and which is not corrected or remedied
within the time set in the written notice of the violation or, if the Hauler
cannot reasonably correct or remedy the breach within the time set forth
in such notice, if the Hauler should fail to commence to correct or
remedy such violation within the time set forth in such notice and
diligently effect such correction or remedy thereafter.
F. PENALTIES.
(1) The City Council may, in its discretion, assess penalties not to
exceed the sum of Seven Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($750.00) per day,
for each calendar day that service is not provided by Hauler in
accordance with these Regulations. The amount of the liquidated
damages shall be increased by the past year's consumer price index for
the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside area on March 1 and effective July 1
of each year. In addition, the Council may order the assessment against
the cash bond required by Section 6A, above, the termination of these
Regulations, or both.
(2) The Hauler shall pay any penalty assessed by the City Council
within ten (10) days after it is assessed. If it is not paid within the ten
(10) day period, the City may withdraw them from the security fund
established by the cash bond required by Section 6A, above, order the
termination of the license granted by these Regulations, or both.
SECTION 11. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES.
A. Should Hauler contend that the City is in breach of these Regulations, it
shall file a request with the City Manager for an administrative hearing before the
City Council on the allegation. The Council may refer the matter to a hearing
officer.
B. If the City Council refers a matter to a hearing officer, then the Council
shall select as the hearing officer a retired California Superior Court judge or
Appellate Court justice, none of whom are related to the parties.
C. The hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1280, et seq. The exclusive venue shall be in Riverside County,
California. A hearing officer to whom a matter is referred shall have the authority to
(i) order the City or the Hauler to undertake remedial action to cure the breach and to
prevent occurrence of similar breaches in the future; (ii) assess damages and/or levy a
penalty upon the Hauler consistent with the terms of these Regulations; or (iii) find
them has been no breach. If the hearing officer finds there has been no breach, such
a decision precludes the City from conducting a default heating. The amount of the
penalty shall be reasonably related to the seriousness of the breach of these
Regulations.
D. The party losing the heating shall be liable for the heating officer's fees.
E. Any failure of the Hauler to comply with the heating officer's order shall
be deemed a material breach of these Regulations, and may be grounds for
termination of the license.
F. The hearing officer shall commence the hearing within thirty (30) days
of selection unless the parties and the hearing officer otherwise agree. Any party to
the hearing may issue a request to compel reasonable document production from the
other party. Disputes'concerning the scope of document production and enforcement
of document requests shall be subject to agreement by the parties, or if agreement is
not reached within twenty (20) days of that document request, then by disposition by
order of the heating officer. Any such document request shall be subject to the
proprietary rights and rights of privilege of the parties, and the hearing officer shall
adopt procedures to protect such rights. Except as may be otherwise specifically
agreed by the parties, no other form of pretrial discovery shall be available to the
parties; provided that if either party notifies the hearing officer that a material
violation of these Regulations or rights in connection therewith is claimed by either
party, the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1283.05 shall apply.
G. Neither party may communicate separately with the heating officer after
the hearing officer has been selected. All subsequent communications between a
party and a hearing officer shall be simultaneously delivered to the other party. This
provision shall not apply to communications made to schedule a hearing or request a
continuance.
H. Until final judgment is entered from the hearing officer proceeding under
the foregoing provisions and the time for appeal or other post-judgment petition has
expired, the imposition or enforcement of any penalties or sanctions provided in these
Regulations and related to the subject matter of the hearing shall be stayed. The
hearing officer may modify or cancel any proposed penalties or sanctions upon a
finding that the party subject thereto acted with substantial justification or if the
interests of justice so require.
I. Any party to a hearing may petition the Superior Court in Riverside
County, California to confirm, correct, or vacate the award on the grounds stated in
the General Arbitration Act. Any proceedings on appeal shall be in accordance with
Code of Civil Procedures § 1294 and § 1294.2.
SECTION 12. CITY'S ADDITIONAL REMEDIES.
In addition to the remedies set forth in Sections 10-11, above, City shall have
the right to obtain damages and/or injunctive relief.
SECTION 13. RIGHTS OF CITY TO PERFORM DURING EMERGENCY.
A. Should Hauler, for any reason whatsoever, except the occurrence or
existence of any of the events or conditions set forth in Section 23A, "Force
Majeure," below, refuse or be unable to collect, transport, recycle, compost, and
dispose of solid waste and construction debris and provide temporary bin/rolloff
services any or all of the refuse, compostables, and recyclables which it is obligated
under these Regulations for a period of more than seventy-two (72) hours, and if as a
result thereof, debris, refuse, compostables, recyclables, and construction debris
should accumulate in City to such an extent, in such a manner, or for such a time that
the City Manager should find that such accumulation endangers or menaces the public
health, safety, or welfare, then in such event City shall have the right, upon
twenty-four (24) hour prior written notice to Hauler, during the period of such
emergency, to temporarily take possession of any or all equipment and facilities of
Hauler previously used in the collection, transportation, recycling, tomposting, and
disposal of solid waste and construction debris and provide temporary bin/rolloff
services under these Regulations, and to use such equipment and facilities to collect,
recycle, compost, and transport any or all debris, refuse, compostables, recyclables,
and construction debris and provide temporary bin/rolloff services which Hauler
would otherwise be obligated to collect, recycle, compost, transport, and dispose of
solid waste and construction debris and provide temporary bin/rolloff services
pursuant to these Regulations. Hauler agrees that in such event it shall fully
cooperate with City to effect such a transfer of possession for City's use.
B. Hauler agrees that, in such event, City may take temporary possession of
and use all of said equipment and facilities without paying Hauler any rental or other
charge, provided that City agrees that, in such event, it assumes complete
responsibility for the proper and normal use of such equipment and facilities. City
agrees that it shall immediately relinquish possession of all of the above mentioned
property to Hauler upon receipt of written notice from Hauler to the effect that it is
able to resume its normal responsibilities under these Regulations.
SECTION 14. PRIVACY.
A. Hauler shall stric~y observe and protect the rights of privacy of
customers. Information identifying individual customers or the composition or
contents of a customer's waste stream shall not be revealed to any non-governmental
person, business, or no profit entity, unless upon the authority of a court of law, by
statute, or upon valid authorization of the customer. This provision shall not be
construed to preclude Hauler from preparing, participating in, or assisting in the
preparation of waste characterization studies or waste stream analyses which may be
required by AB 939.
B. Hauler shall not market or distribute, outside the normal course of its
business, mailing lists with the names and addresses of customers.
C. The rights accorded customers pursuant to this Section shall be in
addition to any other privacy right accorded customers pursuant to Federal or State
law.
SECTION 15. REPORTS AND ADVERSE INFORMATION.
A. Annual Reports.
Upon the City Manager's written request made at least sixty (60) days before
the close of Hauler's fiscal year, the Hauler shall submit a written annual report, in a
form approved by the City, including, but not limited to, the following information:
(1) A summary of the previous year' s (or, in the case of the initial
report year, the initial year's) activities including, but not limited to,
services begun or discontinued during the reporting year, and the number
of customers for each class of service;
(2) A report, in a form satisfactory to the City, on the City 's
progress in meeting and maintaining its ability to meet its goals under
AB 939, along with any recommended changes.
(3) A revenue statement, setting forth quarte~y License Fees and the
basis for the calculation thereof, certified by an officer of the Hauler;
(4) A list of Hauler's officers and members of its board of directors.
(5) A list of stockholders or other equity investors holding five
percent (5 % ) or more of the voting interest in the Hauler and any
subsidiaries unless Hauler is a public corporation whose annual reports
are publicly available.
B. Adverse Information.
(1) Hauler shall provide City two copies of all reports, or other
material adversely affecting these Regulations, submitted by Hauler to
the EPA, the California Integrated Waste Management Board, or any
other Federal or State agency. Copies shall be submitted to City
simultaneously with Hauler's filing of such matters with said agencies.
Hauler's routine correspondence to said agencies need not be automat-
ically submitted to City, but shall be made available to City upon written
request, as provided in Section 22, below.
(2) The Hauler shall submit to City copies of all pleadings,
applications, notifications, communications, and documents of any kind,
submitted by the Hauler to, as well as copies of all decisions,
correspondence, and actions by, any Federal, State, and local courts,
regulatory agencies, and other government bodies relating specifically to
Hauler's performance of services pursuant to these Regulations. Any
confidential data exempt from public disclosure shall be retained in
confidence by the City and its authorized agents and shall not be made
available for public inspection.
(3) Hauler shall submit to the City such other information or reports
in such forms and at such times as the City may reasonably request or
require.
(4) All reports and records required under this or any other section
shall be furnished at the sole expense of the Hauler.
(5) A copy of each of Hauler's annual and other periodic public
financial reports and those of its parent, subsidiary, and affiliated
corporation and other entities, as the City requests, shall be submitted to
the City within thirty (30) days after receipt of a request.
C. Failure to Report.
The refusal, failure, or neglect of the Hauler to file any of the reports
required, or the inclusion of any materially false or misleading statement or
representation made knowingly by the Hauler in such report shall be deemed a
material breach of these Regulations, and shall subject the Hauler to all remedies,
legal or equitable, which are available to the City under these Regulations or
otherwise.
SECTION 16. COMPENSATION.
A. Hauler Rates.
Hauler shall provide the services described in these Regulations in accordance
with the rates fixed by City from time to time, all as described as set forth in the
Exhibit "D," "Schedule of Rates."
B. Modification and Adjustment of Rates.
Except as provided in Exhibit "D, " the rates set forth on Exhibit "D" shall
remain in effect until adjusted by City by a Resolution of the City Council.
C. Notice of Rate Increases: The Hauler shall provide the City and
customers, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the beginning of a billing period,
written notice of the implementation of changes in any of its rates and charges which
are not subject to regulation by the City. The notice shall include a statement of the
reasons for the rate increase.
D. Resolution of Disputes Regarding Rate Adjustments: Any dispute
regarding the annual "CPI" and Landfill Tipping Fee adjustment, or the computation
thereof, described in Exhibit "D, " or any other dispute regarding Hauler's
reimbursement for fees, special services, or extraordinary costs described in Exhibit
"D," shall be decided by the City Manager, or referred by the Manager to the City
Council, or to a hearing officer as provided in Section 11 above. The rates in effect
at the time such dispute is submitted to the City Manager, City Council, or a hearing
officer shall remain in effect pending resolution of such dispute. The effective date of
any dispute resolution, whether retroactive or prospective, shall reasonably be
determined by the City Manager, City Council, or the heating officer, as appropriate.
E. Billing and Payment:
(1) Hauler may bill customers for all services, whether regular or
special. Hauler shall provide itemized bills, distinctly showing charges
for all classifications of services, including the charges for late payment.
The Hauler shall not designate that portion of a customer's bill
attributable to the license fee as a separate item on customers' bills.
Billings may be made monthly in advance for commercial and all bin
service customers, and may be made three (3) months in advance for
residential customers.
(2) City has elected to bill residents of single family attached homes
for standard refuse collection, recycling, and tomposting by the
exclusive franchisee only through a parcel charge system.
F. Delinquent Accounts. Hauler may discontinue service as set forth in this
Section. Persons who have not remitted required payments within 30 days after the
date of billing shall be notified on forms approved by City. Said forms shall contain
a statement that services may be discontinued 15 days from the date of notice if
payment is not made before that time. Upon payment of the delinquent, redelivery,
or reinstatement fees, if applicable, Hauler shall resume collection on the next
regularly scheduled collection day.
G. Refunds. Hauler shall refund to each customer, on a pro rata basis, any
advance service payments made by such customer for service not provided when
service is discontinued by the customer.
SECTION 17. COLLECTION EQUIPMENT.
A. Hauler shall provide an adequate number of vehicles and equipment for
the collection, transportation, recycling, and disposal of solid waste for which it is
responsible under these Regulations. The equipment of Hauler used under these
Regulations shall be subject to inspection by City on a semiannual basis but shall not
be subject to any license fees therefor.
16
(1) All solid waste, transport, and bin vehicles used by Hauler under
these Regulations shall be registered with the Department of Motor
Vehicles of the State of California, shall be kept clean and in good
repair, shall be uniformly painted, and shall be no more than ten (10)
years old. A sufficient supply of parts must be kept on hand to ensure
timely and continuous fulffilment of these Regulations.
(2) All bins and containers provided shall be functional and
maintained to present an acceptable appearance. Any new three cubic
yard bins provided shall be brand new steel bins with plastic lids.
(3) Solid waste collection, transport, and bin vehicles shall be washed
at least once every seven (7) calendar days.
(4) All vehicles, high visibility bins, rolloffs, and the residential
container designated as the refuse container shall display the Orange
County Solid Waste Haulers Anti-Drug Campaign decal. The decal on
the residential refuse container shall be located on the side of the
container. The small inscription area on the top of all of the residential
containers shall be labeled as follows: refuse container - "Property Of
The City Of Temecula," recycling container - "Recycling - Everyones'
Responsibility," and the greenwastes container - "25% By 1995 - 50%
By 2000."
SECTION 18. PUBLIC ACCESS TO HAULER.
A. Office Hours.
Hauler's office hours shall be, at a minimum, from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.
daily, on all collection days. A representative of Hauler shall be available during
office hours for communication with the public at Hauler's principal office. In the
event that normal business cannot be rectified over the telephone, a representative of
Hauler shall agree to meet with the public at a location agreeable to Hauler and the
public. Normal office hours telephone numbers shall either be a local or toll free
call. Hauler shall also maintain a local or toll free after hours telephone number for
use during other than normal business hours. Hauler shall have a representative or
answering service available at said after-hours telephone number during all hours
other than normal office hours.
B. Service Complaints.
(1) All customer complaints shall be directed to Hauler. Hauler shall
record all customer complaints received by mail, by telephone, or in
person (including date, name, address of complainant, and nature of
complaint). Hauler agrees to use its best efforts to resolve all complaints
by close of business of the second business day following the date on
which such complaint is received. Service complaints may be
investigated by City. Unless a settlement satisfactory to complainant, the
Hauler, and the Manager's designee is reached, the complainant may
refer the matter to the City Manager for review.
(2) Hauler shall maintain records listing the date of consumer
complaints, the customer, describing the nature of the complaint or
request, and when and what action was taken by the Hauler to resolve
the complaint. All such records shall be maintained and shall be
available for inspection by City, as described in Section 22. Hauler shall
prepare monthly summaries of consumer complaints. The summaries
shall be available and delivered monthly to the City Manager or the City
Manager's designated representative.
C. Government Liaison Person.
The Hauler shall designate a "government liaison person" who shall be
responsible for working with the City Manager or the City Manager's designated
representative to resolve consumer complaints.
SECTION 19. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTED CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS.
A. The Hauler shall notify customers of this complaint arbitration procedure
at the time customers apply for or are provided service, and subsequently, annually.
B. A customer dissatisfied with Hauler's decision regarding a complaint
may ask the City to review the complaint. To obtain this review, the customer must
request City review within 30 days of receipt of Hauler's response to the Complaint,
or within 45 days of submitting the complaint to the Hauler, if the Hauler has failed
to respond to the complaint. The City may extend the time to request its review for
good cause.
C. Before reviewing the complaint, the City Manager shall refer it to the
Hauler. If the Hauler fails to cure the complaint within ten (10) days, the City
Manager shall review the customer's complaint and determine if further action is
warranted. The City Manager may request written statements from the Hauler and
customer, and/or oral presentations.
D. The City Manager shall determine if the customer' s complaint is
justified, and if so, what remedy, if any, shall be imposed. The remedy under this
Section shall be limited to a rebate of customer charges related to the period of breach
of any of the terms of these Regulations and a penalty of up to $100 for any single
event or series of related events, or any actual damages.
E. The City Manager may delegate these duties to a designee. The decision
of the City Manager or his designee shall be final on any matter under Five Thousand
Dollars ($5,000.00). In the event of a decision on a matter awarding five thousand
dollars or more ($5,000), Hauler may seek review pursuant to Section 11, above.
SECTION 20. OWNERSHIP OF SOLID WASTE.
Once refuse, compostables, recyclables, and construction debris are placed in
bins/rolloffs for collection, or containers at curbside, ownership shall transfer to
Hauler. Subject to Hauler's duty to meet the source reduction and recycling goals
which apply to City, Hauler is hereby granted the right to retain, recycle, compost,
dispose of, and otherwise use such refuse, compostables, recyclables, and construction
debris, or any part thereof, in any lawful fashion or for any lawful purpose desired by
Hauler. Subject to the provisions of these Regulations, Hauler shall have the right to
retain any benefit profit resulting from its right to retain, recycle, compost, dispose
of, or use the refuse, compostables, recyclables, and construction debris which it
collects. Refuse, compostables, recyclables, and construction debris, or any part
thereof, which is disposed of at a disposal site or sites (whether landfill, transforma-
tion facility, transfer station, or material recovery facility) shall become the property
of the owner or operator of the disposal site or sites once deposited there by Hauler.
However, City, at its sole option, shall retain the right to require Hauler which
transformation facility, transfer station, or material recovery facility shall be used to
retain, recycle, compost, process, and dispose of solid waste and construction debris
generated within the Service Area. In this instance, Hauler shall conduct a rate audit
and recommend, if necessary, a rate adjustment.
19
SECTION ~1. INSURANCE.
A. Workers' Compensation Insurance.
Hauler shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect throughout the entire
term of these Regulations full workers' compensation insurance in accord with the
provisions and requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California. Certificates
that implement the required coverage shall be filed and maintained with the City
Clerk throughout the term of these Regulations.
B. Public Liability Insurance.
ttauler shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect throughout the entire
term of these Regulations a Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability
(occurrence) policy with a minimum limit of TEN MILLION DOLLARS
($10,000,000.00) aggregate and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per
occurrence for bodily injury and property damage, with any self-insured retention not
exceeding $200,000.00 per occurrence. Said insurance shall protect Hauler and City
from any claim for damages for bodily injury, including accidental death, as well as
from any claim for property damage which may arise from operations performed
pursuant to these Regulations, whether such operations be by Hauler itself, or by its
agents, employees, and/or subhaulers. Copies of the policies or endorsements
evidencing the above required insurance coverage shall be filed with the City Clerk.
All of the following endorsements are required to be made a pan of the insurance
policies required by this Section:
(1) "The City, its employees, and officers, are hereby added as
insureds for liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Hauler."
(2) "This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects
any other valid and collectible insurance the City may possess including any
self-insured retention the City may have, and any other insurance the City does
possess shall be considered excess insurance and shall not contribute with it."
(3) "This insurance shall act for each insured, as though a separate
policy had been written for each. This, however, shall not act to increase the limit of
liability of the insuring company."
(4) "Thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mall, retum
receipt requested, shall be given to the City in the event of suspension, cancellation,
reduction in coverage or in limits, or non-renewal of this policy for whatever reason.
Such notice shall be sent to the City Clerk."
The limits of such insurance coverage, and companies, shall be subject to review and
approval by the City Manager every year and may be increased at that time and
match the coverage provided by the City's own liability insurance policy. The City
shall be included as a named insured on all policies and endorsements.
C. Modification.
The insurance requirements provided herein may be modified or waived in
writing by the City Council upon the request of Hauler, provided the City Council
determines such modification or waiver is in the best interests of City considering all
relevant factors, including the fact that the parent of Hauler may be self-insured up to
a certain acceptable amount.
SECTION 22. HAULER'S BOOKS AND RECORDS: AUDITS.
A. Hauler shall maintain all records relating to the services provided
hereunder, including, but not limited to, customer lists, billing records, accounts
payable records, financial records, maps, AB 939 compliance records, and customer
complaints, for the full term of these Regulations, and an additional period of not less
than three (3) years, or any longer period required by law. The City shall have the
right, upon five (5) business days advance notice, to inspect all such records of the
Hauler which reasonably relate to Hauler's compliance with the provisions of these
Regulations. Such records shall be made available to City at Hauler's regular place
of business, but in no event outside the County of Riverside.
B. Should any examination or audit of Hauler's records reveal an
underpayment of any fee required under these Regulations, the amount of such
underpayment shall become due and payable to City not later than fifteen (15) days
after written notice of such underpayment is sent to Hauler by City. Should an
underpayment of more than three percent (3%) be discovered, Hauler shall bear the
entire cost of the audit.
SECTION 23. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Force Majeure.
Hauler shall not be in default under these Regulations in the event that the
temporary bin/rolloff services and the collection, transportation, recycling,
composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris provided by the
Hauler are temporarily interrupted or discontinued for any of the following reasons:
riots, wars, sabotage, civil disturbances, insurrections, explosion, natural disasters
such as floods, earthquakes, landslides, and fires, strikes, lockouts, and other labor
disturbances or other catastrophic events which are beyond the reasonable control of
Hauler. Other catastrophic events do not include the financial inability of the Hauler
to perform or failure of the Hauler to obtain any necessary permits or licenses from
other governmental agencies or the right to use the facilities of any public utility
where such failure is due solely to the acts or omissions of the Hauler. In the event a
labor disturbance interrupts temporary bin/rolloff services and the collection,
transportation, recycling, cornposting, and disposal of solid waste and construction
debris by Hauler as required under these Regulations, City may elect to exercise its
rights under Section 13 of these Regulations.
B. Independent Contractor.
Hauler is an independent contractor and not an officer, agent, servant, or
employee of City. Hauler is solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its
officers, agents, employees, haulers, and subhaulers, if any. Nothing in these
Regulations shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between City
and Hauler. Neither Hauler nor its officers, employees, agents, or subhaulers shall
obtain any rights to retirement or other benefits which accrue to City employees.
C. Pavement Damage.
Hauler shall be responsible for any extraordinary damage to City's driving
surfaces, whether or not paved, resulting from the weight of vehicles providing refuse
collection and temporary bin/rolloff services directly attributable and at the location of
bins, rolloffs, and containers on public or private property.
D. Property Damage.
Any physical damage caused by the negligent or willful acts or omissions of
employees, Haulers, or subhaulers of the Hauler to private or public property shall be
repaired or replaced.
22
E. Right of Entry.
Hauler shall have the right, until receipt of written notice revoking permission
to pass is delivered to Hauler, to enter or drive on any private street, court, place,
easement, or other private property for the purpose of providing temporary bin/rolloff
services and the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of
solid waste and construction debris pursuant to these Regulations.
F. Fees and Gratuities.
Hauler shall not, nor shall it permit any agent, employee, or subhauler
employed by it to, request, solicit, demand, or accept, either directly or indirectly,
any compensation or gratuity for temporary bin/rolloff services and the collection,
transportation, recycling, tomposting, and disposal of solid waste and construction
debris otherwise required under these Regulations.
G. Exhibits Incorporated.
Exhibits "A" through "E" are attached to and incorporated in these
Regulations by reference.
H. Identification Required.
(1) Hauler shall provide its employees, agents, and subhaulers with
identification for all individuals who may make personal contact with
residents of the City.
(2) The Hauler shall provide a list of current employees, agents, and
subhaulers to the City upon request. The City may require the Hauler to
notify customers yearly of the form of said identification.
23
EXHIBIT A
FRANCHISE AREA
All portions of the City shown on the map attached as Exhibit A-1.
Exhibit B
Special Wastes
Flammable waste.
Containerized waste (e.g., a drum, barrel, portable tank, box, pail, etc.).
Waste transported in a bulk tanker.
Liquid waste.
Sewage sludge.
Waste from a pollution control process.
Residue and debris from the cleanup of a spill or release of chemical substances,
commercial products or any other special wastes.
Contaminated soil, waste, residue, debris, and articles from the cleanup of a site or
facility formerly used for the generation, storage, treatment, recycling, reclamation,
or disposal of any other special wastes.
Dead animals.
Manure.
Waste water.
Explosive substances.
Radioactive materials.
Materials which have been exposed to highly infectious or contagious diseases.
Hazardous materials.
Exhibit "C"
Recycling Programs. Service Commencement.
AB 939 Topics, and Facility Considerations
A. Hauler shall implement alternatives identified in the City's Source
Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Wastes Element
(I-II-1WE), when completed, by separate Regulations. Hauler shall be responsible to
implement, their share based on market share, the public education and awareness
portions of the SRRE and HHWE, at Hauler's expense. Hauler shall provide City
with written reports in a form adequate to meet City's reporting requirements to the
California Integrated Waste Management Board and to the County of Riverside
throughout the term of these Regulations wherein its performance under this program
is set forth in detail.
B. Effective immediately, Hauler shall conduct a waste audit of all
contracted solid waste collection accounts to determine their recyclable content, prior
to services being rendered. The process used to conduct this waste audit shall be
shared with the City of Temecula, and the County to ensure permit compliance and
acceptance. Those accounts that contain a significant recyclable content shall be
processed through a Recycling Processing Center that currently processes salvaged
separated materials for reuse. Customers achieving this content, or higher, shall only
be charged the service rates that appear in Exhibit "D, " paragraph D 5. Those
accounts that do not satisfy the content level, shall have their waste stream disposed
of at the landfill and shall only be charged the service rates that appear in Exhibit
"D,", paragraph D 5. However, if these customers desire to commence a source
separated recycling program, a recycling container shall be provided by Hauler and
customers shall be charged the additional service rates reflected in Exhibit "D,"
paragraph D 6. Once Hauler's or an appropriate recovery facility is operational to
accept the entire waste stream, customers shall only be charged the service rates
reflected in Exhibit "D, " paragraph D 5, and the source separated recycling rates in
Exhibit "D," paragraph D 6 will become a customer option.
C. On January 1, 1992, Haulers desiring to provide single family residential
services shall institute a three sixty (60) gallon single family residential container
recycling system pursuant to the exclusive franchisee's system and Chapter 6.10.
One container shall be for refuse, one container for greenwastes, and one container
for cornmingled recyclables. The initial recycling containers shall be provided by
Hauler at Hauler's expense and provide the minimum container specifications
contained in Exhibit "F" . Hauler shall replace and repair containers as may be
necessary as a result of normal wear and tear.
D. By January 1, 1992, any Hauler providing single family residential
services shall implement a completely 100% mechanized single family residential
container system in conjunction with the use of a Recycling Processing Center and a
compost diversion system to recover recyclables and divert compostables in a method
similar to the exclusive franchisee's system and approved by the City Manager or his
designee. Mechanized means that Hauler shall provide collector trucks that are
capable of picking up containers, emptying them into the collector truck, and then
returning them to the curbside without any human handling of the container. The
container that is designated as recyclables shall be processed at a Recycling
Processing Center. The greenwastes container shall be diverted from the landfill in a
mutually acceptable system to City and Hauler. The refuse container shall be taken to
the landfill for disposal.
E. By January 1, 1992, Hauler shall implement the bulky item pickups and
household hazardous waste roundup procedures outlined in Section 4.
F. The failure of Hauler to achieve any of the above shall be deemed a
material breach of these Regulations.
8.
9.
10.
Exhibit "D"
Schedule of Rates
Mechanized Single Family Attached Residential Collection, Disposal,
Cornposting, and Recycling - Hauler Billing
Monthly Rate: $10.98
Mechanized Single Family Detached Residential Collection, Disposal,
Cornposting, and Recycling - Parcel Charge
Monthly Rate: $10.98
Mechanized Single Family Attached and Detached Residential Additional
Refuse, Cornposting, and Recycling Container - Hauler Billing
Monthly Per Container Rate:$ 4.00
Single Family Attached and Detached Residential Additional Bulky Item
Pickup - Hauler Billing
Pickup Rate: $ 5.00
Commercial, Industrial, and Multi-Family Residential RefuSe Monthly
Bin Rates (one 3 cubic yard bin) with following pickups per week:
1 x week $ 55.00 5 x week $275.00
2 x week $110.00 6 x week $330.00
3 x week $165.00 7 x week $385.00
4 x week $220.00
Commercial, Industrial, and Multi-Family Residential Reeyclinlr
Monthly Bin Rates (one 3 cubic yard bin) with following pickups per
week:
1 x week $ 30.00 5 x week $150.00
2 x week $ 60.00 6 x week $180.00
3 x week $ 90.00 7 x week $210.00
4 x week $120.00
Temporary 3 Cubic Yard Bin Rate:
Redelivery and Reinstatement Rate:
40 cubic yard Rolloff Bin Rate:
10 cubic yard Rolloff/Lowboy Box Rate:
$45.00
$25.00
$130.00 plus landfill fee
$130.00 plus land fill fee
11. Annual Consumer Price Index CCPI") and Tipping Fee Adjustment.
The rams in paragraphs D 1-10, above, shall be automatically adjusted to
reflect changes in the consumer price index and landfill fees. The CPI adjustment
shall be made annually and such adjustment shall be effective as of the first day of
July of each calendar year. The "CPI adjustment shall be equal to the amount derived
by multiplying (a) the previous rate by (b) the percentage increase or decrease in the
Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside Metropolitan Areas during the prior calendar year, excluding the housing
component. The comparison shall be made for each March 1st during the term hereof
and shall be effective each July 1st. The first CPI adjustment shall occur July 1,
1992. The landfill tipping fee adjustment shall be a pro-rata pass through of any
tipping fee increase, and shall be effective at the start of the first full billing period
after the landfill tipping fee is adjusted. As of the effective date of these Regulations,
the landfill tipping fee is $23.00. The formulas for the annual CPI and Landfill
Tipping Fee Adjustments are as follows:
(1) CPI Formula:
(a) Exhibit "D , " paragraphs 1-4: CRate x 78%) x CPI
(b) Exhibit "D, " paragraphs 5-10: (Rate x 71.5% x CPI
(2) Land fill Tipping Fee Formula:
(a)
$0.21 per $1 .00/ton landfill increase times current
published residential recycling (less greenwastes) diversion
rate, e.g., $8.00 landfill increase with a 25% diversion
rate would equal: $.21 x 8 = $1.68 x 25% = $.42 -
$1.68 = $1.26 rate increase.
Co)
$0.91 per $1.00/ton landfill increase times current
published nonresidential recycling diversion rate less
greenwastes, concrete, and asphalt, e.g., $8.00 landfill
increase with a 25% diversion rate would equal: $.91 x 8
= $7.28 x 25% = $1.82 - $7.28 = $5.46 rate increase.
12. Extraordinary Costs.
A. In addition to, and not in lieu of, the annual CPI increase or
decrease described in paragraph D 10, above, Hauler shall also be entitled to rate
increases or decreases in an amount equal to Hauler's extraordinary increases or
decreases in its cost of collection. Such extraordinary cost increases or decreases
shall be subject to City Council approval. Since tipping fee adjustments shall be a
pro-rata pass through to City, Hauler's material recovery facility or transfer station
processing fees, now or later imposed, shall neither be levied on City nor added to
the rates in Exhibit "D." Such extraordinary increases or decreases in its cost of
collection shall include, by way of example and not by way of limitation: (1) a
change in the location of the land fill or other lawful disposal sites to which the Hauler
is required to transport solid waste collected hereunder; (2) levied material recovery
facility host fees; and (3) changes in the local, State or Federal laws governing
temporary bin/rolloff services and collection, separation, transportation, recycling,
composting, or disposal of solid waste and construction debris.
B. Hauler shall not begin to charge customers for residential recycling
until the effective date of the respective recycling programs.
Exhibit "E"
Minimum Container Specifications
Each container provided for the residential curbside program shall have a capacity of
sixty (60) gallons and be constructed of rigid, durable, and recyclable materials with a
minimum five (5) year life expectancy warranted by the manufacturer. Hauler shall
be responsible for the replacement of container, wheels, lids, hinges, axles, and
handles. The containers shall meet the following specifications in all material
respects. Any deviations from the specifications shall be approved by the City
Manager or designee.
1. Cart Body:
Rotationally molded, first quality, Union Carbide GPEP-803-LMDPE. Certified to
contain ultraviolet stabilization provided by the equivalent of .5% of UV 531
stabilization compound. Certified to meet a minimum ESCR rating exceeding 1000
hours for both 100% and 10% Igepal solutions.
2. Cart Handle Mounts:
Integrally molded part of cart body. External handle diameter, 1.375 inches.
Features three comfortable and convenient gripping areas.
3. Card Lit:
Rotationally molded, first quality, Union Carbide GPEP-803-LMDPE. Nominal
thickness, 0. 125 inches. Certified to contain ultraviolet stabilization provided by the
equivalent of .5 % of UV stabilization compound.
Attached with hinge which rotates with no interference. Encases PVC pipe within
1/4" walls.
Domed to facilitate runoff of water.
Imprinted with "Instructions" and "Indications and Contraindications" in English and
Spanish.
4. Wheel Retainers:
Plastic coated steel.
5. Axles:
5/8" galvanized solid steel fully supported by cart body. No bolts or rivets used for
mounting.
6. Wheels:
12 inch by 2 inch (nominal) HDPE. Minimum R.M.A. load rating of 180 pounds per
wheel.
7. Safety Bar:
Minimum 1.00 inch diameter, 16 gauge, galvanized steel tube. Stainless steel
optional.
Rotates freely on its axis to facilitate safe engagement and disengagement of dumper
locking hook.
Accessible for quick, clean, and easy removal and replacement from exterior of cart
by maintenance personnel in the filed without use of power tools.
8. Capacity:
Container volume 60 U.S. gallons.
9. Dimensions:
Width: 31 inches. Fits through gates and doors.
Length: 36 inches.
Height: 45 lines.
10. Color:
Ultraviolet stabilized, non-fading black, green, and blue. Special colors available.
11. Stability:
Designed to prevent being turned over by winds of up to 25 mph in any direction
when empty.
ITEM NO. 14
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL
David F. Dixon
September 24, 1991
PARK USE ORDINANCE
PREPARED BY:
Shawn D. Nelson, Community Services Director
RECOMMENDATION:
Introduce and read by title only Ordinance 91 - __ entitled "an Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Temecula Adopting Parks and Recreation Facilities Operational
Policies and Regulations."
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of the parks use ordinance is to design policies and regulations regarding
public usage, activities, facility requests and special events. The ordinance provides
for equal opportunity for public parks usage, development of various user groups, and
establishes parks and recreation facilities regulations.
This item appears on the City Council Agenda rather than the Community Services
District Agenda so that it can be adopted as a City Ordinance. The Community
Services District must, however, establish park use fees and, therefore, a resolution
for this purpose appears as a public hearing on the Community Services District
Agenda. If the ordinance and resolution are approved, the resolution establishing park
use fees will go into effect concurrent with the effective date of the Ordinance.
The Park and Recreations Commission approved and recommended the City Council
approve the park use ordinance at its meeting of August 12, 1991.
Attachment: Park Use Ordinance
a:agenda
OimiNANC NO. 91-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
~ ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACHJTY
OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula has authority over the
public parks and recreational facilities within the jurisdiction boundaries of the City of
Temecula; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Directors may adopt regulations binding upon all
persons governing the use of City parks and recreational facilities and property, and may deem
a violation of any such regulation and misdemeanor.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOW:
SECTION 1. General Policy:
A. Equal' Opportunity: Any and all individuals shall be provided equal
opportunity for use of any recreational facility and any recreational program without regard to
physical limitation, age, race, color, national origin, religion, political beliefs or sex.
B. Reserved Use: Reserved use (defined as exclusive, permitted use for one
or more occasions) of community, neighborhood and other recreational facilities shall require
obtaining a "Use Permit" in a form established by the City of Temecula Community Services
District (TCSD). The TCSD may establish use fees by Resolution.
C. Community Park (Unreserved) Use: Use of all community park facilities
(defined as a site that serves the City's residential areas) will be based on first come first serve
basis. No "Use Permit" is required for this purpose. If a user group wishes to reserve the use
of a community park facility, a "Use Permit" shall be required, with all applicable fees, rules,
regulations, terms and conditions enforced.
D. Multiple Facility Reservations: If more than one recreational facility is
reserved (e.g. two sports fields), applicable fees and deposits shall be charged for each facility
reserved.
E. Sponsored Uses: Any use of recreational facilities scheduled for TCSD
sponsored or co-sponsored uses shall be deemed a use for TCSD purposes, and shall be exempt
from fees, deposits and permit requirements listed herein. Such determination shall be made by
the Director of Community Services.
5/Ords/100 -1-
F. User Groups: User groups are established and defined as follows to
categorize groups using certain recreational facilities. User groups designations form the basis
for variable fee schedules for certain recreational facilities as provided elsewhere herein.
Group 1 - TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and
recreational activities.
Group II - Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented
sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting community oriented
leisure or sports activities.
Group III - Base standard rate for community users on a non-
profit basis.
Group IV - Profit making, commercial businesses or non-resident
organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public.
G. Recurring Use: Recurring use is generally defined as uses of recreational
facilities on a regularly scheduled basis for more than one occasion (i.e. leagues, etc.)
H. Nonrecurring Use: Nonrecurring use is generally defined as uses of
recreational facilities on a one time only or special event basis (i.e., annual picnic, parties or
company sponsored events). A fee and permit is required only when reserved use by an
organization is requested.
I. Exemption: Due to special or unusual circumstances, the Parks and
Recreation Commission may exempt user groups II, III and IV from fees for the use of
recreational facilities. It is the responsibility of the specific user group to formally request
exemption from the Parks and Recreation Commission. The request should stipulate the special
or unusual circumstances that necessitate exemption.
J. Scheduling Priorities: Scheduling priorities shall be by user groups as
indicated previously with Group I having precedence over II, Group II over III, etc. In the
event of conflict, the Director of Community Services ("Director") reserves the right to schedule
any group. Scheduling of reserved uses will be carried out by the Director or his/her designee
in a fair and equitable manner, to serve the leisure and recreation needs of the citizens of the
Temecula Community Services District.
K. Sports Field and Facility: It is recognized that recreational facilities and
sports fields vary in type and location. However, fee schedules shall generally apply equally
to all sports fields and facilities depending on the level of service required for an individual
facility.
L. Fee Payment: The fees applicable to the use of facilities are due and
payable at the City of Temecula offices 72 hours prior to the use of that facility. Charges
assessed for damages and grounds cleanup shall include only City's actual cost and are due and
payable upon demand to the user. When fees are due and payable at the time a permit is issued,
5/Ords/lO0 -2-
refunds are permitted if sufficient notice is given to the City
working days notice for nonrecurring groups.
upon cancellation with five (5)
M. Sales and Uses: Authorized user groups, as described herein, which desire
to use facilities for fund-raising purposes shall be allowed to do so subject to policies and fees
contained herein. Food concessionaires and other uses which are determined by the TCSD to
be solely a commercial undertaking, and without educational, recreational or cultural benefit to
the community, shall be selected pursuant to City public bidding procedures.
N. Inclement Weather: Inclement weather is generally defined as weather
which, in the judgement of the Director, has left recreational facilities in a condition which, if
the facilities are used, presents a risk of damage to facilities or injury to users.
The Director shall have the authority to deny use of all or any portion of
a facility to a user based on inclement weather. The Director reserves the exclusive right to
determine that a use of TCSD facilities is precluded by inclement weather, and no refund of fees
shall be made on grounds of bad weather or field condition unless the Director makes such
determination.
O. Denial of Facility Use: The TCSD shall have the authority based on cause
to deny use of all or any portion of a facility to any group or individual who has abused the
privilege of facility use as included in but not limited to these general policies and general rules
goveming the use of community and neighborhood park.
P. Liability Insurance: All user groups conducting reserved sporting or
special event activities, that will attract fifty (50) or more patrons (i.e. tournaments, clinics,
fairs, festivals concerts, performances, camps, etc.) will be required to provide the Director with
a certificate of insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) naming the City
of Temecula and the TCSD as additionally insured.
SECTION 2. Parks & Recreation Facilities Regulations:
Def'mitions: The following words shall have the meaning indicated when used in these
regulations:
A. "Park" means any community park, neighborhood park, or any other
recreational facility maintained by the City of Temecula.
B. "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District, or any other person authorized by the Board, pursuant to law, to act in its
stead.
of Temecula.
Co
"Commission' means the Parks and Recreation Commission for the City
510rds/ l O0 -3-
D. "Amplified sound" means music, sound wave, vibration, or speech
projected or transmitted by electronic equipment, including amplifiers.
E. "Knife or dagger" means any knife, or dagger having a blade of three
inches or more in length; any ice pick or similar sharp stabbing tool; any straight-edge razor
blade fitted to a handle.
F. "Vehicle" means any device by which any person or property may be
propelled, moved, or drawn, excepting a device moved by human power.
G. "Vehicular travel" means travel by a vehicle.
SECTION 3. Duty to Comply: No person shall enter, be, or remain in any park unless
he complies at all times with all of the City ordinances and regulations applicable to such park
and with all other applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations.
SECTION 4. Rules and Regulations Applicable in City Parks: The following rules and
regulations apply in all City parks unless expressly stated otherwise elsewhere in these
regulations.
SECTION 5. Operation of Vehicles:
A. Roads for Public Use: The provisions of the California Vehicle Code are
applicable in the City parks upon any way or place of whatever nature which is publicly
maintained and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel. All violations of
said Vehicle Code shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof.
B. Surfaces Other than Roads for Public Use: Skateboards: No person shall
drive or otherwise operate a vehicle in a park upon surfaces other than those maintained and
open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel, except upon temporary parking areas as may
be designated from time to time by the Commission, and further excepting vehicles in the
service of the City, animal control vehicles, law enforcement vehicles, and motorized
wheelchairs. No person shall ride or operate a skateboard in any park, except in designated
areaS.
SECTION 6. Solicitation Prohibited: No person shall practice, carry on, conduct or
solicit for any occupation, business, or profession in any City park, or sell or offer for sale any
food, beverage, merchandise, article, or anything whatsoever in any City park. This section
shall not apply to any person acting pursuant to a contract with the City of Temecula or the
Temecula Community Services District, or under a permit granted by the Commission.
SECTION 7. Prohibition of Animals in Park: No person shall cause, permit, or allow
any animal owned or possessed by him, or any animal in his care, custody, or control to be
present in any City park except:
5lOrdsilO0 -.4-
(A) Equine animals being led or ridden under reasonable control upon any
bridle paths or trails provided for such purposes.
(B) Equine or other animals which are hitched or fastened at a place expressly
designated for such purpose.
(C) Dogs or cats when led by a cord or chain not more than six (6) feet long,
or when confined within the interior of a vehicle.
(D) Dogs which have been specially trained and are being used by blind or
disabled persons to aid and guide them in their movements.
(E) Small pets which are kept on the person of the possessor at all times.
(F) In connection with activities authorized in writing by the Commission.
(G) Fowls or animals turned loose at the direction of the Commission.
SECTION 8. Duty to Care for Animals: It shall be the mandatory duty of all persons
owning, possessing, in control of, or otherwise responsible for a dog, cat, or an equine animal
in a park to promptly collect, pick up, and remove all fecal matter left behind by said animal
in or upon any park; provided, however, that this subsection shall not apply to guide dogs for
blind or disabled persons or to equine animals on bridle paths.
SECTION 9. Amplified Sound in Parks:
(A) Purpose: The City Council enacts this legislation for the sole purpose of
securing and promoting the public health, comfort, safety, and welfare of its citizenry. While
recognizing that certain uses of sound amplifying equipment are protected by constitutional rights
of free speech and assembly, the City Council nevertheless feels obligated to reasonably regulate
the use of sound amplifying equipment in order to protect the correlative constitutional rights
of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom from the public nuisance of loud and
unnecessary sound.
(B) Permit Required for Amplifiers: It shall be unlawful for any person to
install, use, and operate within a park a loudspeaker or any sound amplifying equipment for the
purposes of giving instruction, directions, talks, addresses, or lectures, or of transmitting music
to any persons or groups of persons in any park, or in the vicinity theroof, except when
installed, used, or operated in compliance with one of the following provisions:
1. By authorized law enforcement or park and recreation personnel
or
2. Under a reservation or permit issued by the Director, and when
operated in accordance with terms of said reservation or permit.
5 /Ords/ l O 0 -5-
(C) Grantin~ and Denial of Permit: In determining whether to grant or deny
a permit, the Director shall be guided by the following considerations:
including the applicant;
The constitutional free speech and assembly fights of all persons,
persons in the park;
The possible effects upon the peaceable passage or presence of
3. The potential for disorder or unlawful injury to persons or property;
4. The potential invasion of others persons' rights of privacy;
5. The possible unlawful breach or disturbance of the peace; and
6. Any actual conflict with other scheduled park uses or events.
The Director shall not deny a permit on the basis of any dislike for or disagreement with
the content of any proposed talks, addresses, lectures, or musical presentations. The Director
may, however, deny a permit for any such events which are designed for the purpose of
advocating imminent lawless conduct.
(D) Power Source for Amplifiers: Amplifiers permitted in parks shall be
operated only through a power source provided by the City, a battery, or a generator.
SECTION 10. Prohibition of Firearms. Fireworks. and Toy Weapons: No person
shall carry or discharge firearms, firecrackers, rockets, torpedoes, or other types of explosives,
or carry or discharge any gun, or pistol, or any sling shot or similar device, or any bows and
arrows, or any other object capable of propelling a projectile, or carry or use any object
calculated to make a noise sufficient to disturb the peace or quiet of the park, or bring into any
park any of the above objects or articles. Fireworks may be permitted for special events only
with formal approval from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Fire Department.
SECTION 11. Prohibition of Dangerous Weapons: The provisions of the
California Dangerous Weapons' Control Law are applicable in City parks and shall be enforced
and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof. No person shall carry on his person,
in plain view, any knife with a blade in access of 3 inches. Dagger are strictly prohibited.
SECTION 12. Exceptions to Applicability: The provisions of Section 10 shall not
be deemed to prohibit the carrying of ordinary tools or equipment for use in a lawful occupation
or for the purpose of lawful recreation.
SECTION 13. Damaging Property: No person shall cut, break, injure, deface,
or disturb any tree, shrub, plant, rock, building, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench, or other
5 lOrdsi l O0 -6-
structure, apparatus, or property, or pluck, pull up, cut, take, or remove any shrub, bush, plant,
or flower, or mark or write upon, paint, or deface in any manner any building, monument,
fence, bench, or other structure.
SECTION 14. Damaging Land: No person shall cut, dig, or remove any wood,
turf, grass, soil, rook, sand, gravel, or fertilizer, except park maintenance personnel.
SECTION 15. Golf: No person shall play or practice the game of golf, including
chipping, putting, driving or any other type of play or practice which includes the hitting of golf
or similar type ball with a golf or similar type club.
SECTION 16. Water: No person shall swim, fish in, bathe, wade in, release pet
animals in, or pollute the water of any fountain, pond, lake, stream, or reservoir except by
permission of the Commission.
SECTION 17. Fires and Fireplaces: No person shall kindle a fire except in
fireplaces provided for that purpose or in barbecues approved by the Commission, except by
permission of the Director.
SECTION 18. Waste Liquids and Refuse: No person shall wash dishes, or empty
salt water or other waste liquids, or leave garbage, cans, bottles, papers, or other refuse
anywhere other than in the receptacles provided therefor.
SECTION 19. Loitering at Night: No person shall be or remain in any City park
between the hours of eleven (11:00) o'clook p.m. and six (6:00) o'clock a.m. of the following
day without permission of the Director. The provisions of Section 8 (c) shall govern the
granting or denial of such permission.
SECTION 20. Meetings: No person shall hold any meeting, service, sporting
event, concert, exercise, parade or exhibition in any public park without first obtaining a permit
from the Director. The provisions of Section 8 (c) shall govern the issuance or denial of a
permit under this Section.
SECTION 21. Alcoholic Beverages: No person shall consume any alcoholic
beverage within any park, unless formally approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
SECTION 22. Controlled Substances: The provisions of the California Uniform
Controlled Substances Act are applicable in district parks and shall be enforced and prosecuted
in accordance with the provisions thereof.
SECTION 23.
City parks.
Glass Containers: No person shall possess any glass container in
5/Orda/100 -7-
SECTION 24. Flying Balloons or Planes: No person shall use any City park as
a primary launch site for hot air balloons unless formally approved by the Park and Recreation
Commission. Motorized airplanes, and gliders are prohibited on City park site.
SECTION 25. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
the same to be posted in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this day of__
,1991.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No. was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1991, by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
510rds/ l O0 -8-
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Chief Building Official 4
September 24, 1991
Building and Safety Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
During the month of August, Staff has seen a decline in permit activity. Revenue for the first
two months of the fiscal year remains higher than this time last year regardless of this recent
decline in permit issuance. Building inspectors remain busy due to the work generated by our
permit activity during the fourth quarter of the last fiscal year.
Staff has been working on preparation for its damage assessment responsibilities in conjunction
with the City's disaster planning efforts. The Department has held two (2) very successful
exercises which mobilized field staff to designated area zones throughout the City to assess
possible damage. Criteria for these assessment exercises was established in order to test the
Department's procedures.
Code Enforcement staff has been involved in distributing information regarding Council direction
as it pertains to banner and A-frame sign enforcement.
Agenda Report
September 24, 1991
Page 2
The following is an update of projects of special note that Staff is currently involved with:
NEW CONSTRUCTION:
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
Paradise Chevrolet
General Dynamics
Commerce National Bank
Primadonnas Restaurant
Main Street Emporium
Soup Exchange
I(2oMart
Jefferson Creek
70% complete
15 % complete
75 % complete
25 % complete
75 % complete
75 % complete
10 % complete
75 % complete
80% complete
COMPLETED OFFICE, OFFICE/WAREHOUSE SPACE:
Ballatom Building (40,000 sq. ft.)
Complete
Hawthorne Park - 13
Buildings (400,000 sq. ft.)
Valley Medical Center (36,000 sq. ft.)
Temecula Valley Bank
Tenant Improvements 10% complete
Tenant Improvement 90 % complete
Complete
AJE/sf
DEPARTHENT OF BUILDING AND SAFET~
Monthly Activity Report For: Auqust, 1991
This Last Month This Last
Month Fiscal Fiscal
Year Yr/Date
PLAWSCHECKED=
Residential 2 7 9 29
Commercial 3 8 11 36
Industrial/Warehouse 0 1 1 0
Others 0 0 0 10
TOTAL: 5 16 21 75
PERHITS ISSUED:
BUILDING 97 128 225 284
Value 3,322,616 7,570,758 10,893,374 7,042,543
Fees 20,740 42,700 63,200 48,353
ELECTRICAL 69 88 157 140
Fees 6,831 6,551 13,383 I5,706
PLUMBING 42 72 114 95
Fees 3,315 12,650 15,926 6,901
MECHANICAL 23 58 81 52
Fees 1,401 6,615 7,929 3,880
TOTAL PERHITSz 231 388 577 571
"'TOTALFEESZ 32,287 68,516 100,438 74,840
THIS MONTHS PERHITS: NO. OF NO/UNITS PLAW CHECK PERHIT
PERHITS YR/DATE FEES FEES
SIN.GLEFAHILr 5 40 1,086 3,194
DUPLEX 0 0 0 0
HULTI-FANILr 0 0 0 0
COMMERCIAL I 5 737 1,797
INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 0
RELOCATE/DMMO I 1 0 240
SWIHHINGPOOLS 10 23 695 1,609
SIGNS 6 14 195 530
OTHER 60 116 713 4,787
ALTER/ADD
TO DWELLING 32 71 3,716 1,892
TO COMMERCIAL 16 31 7,574 18,212
TO INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 0
TOTAL: 131 301 14,716 32,259
.aUILDIN~ VALUATION
~is Fiscal Year to Date: SI0,893,374
Last Fiscal Year to Date: S7,042,543
Last
Calendar
Yr/Date
TOTAL
FEES
4,280
0
0
2,534
0
240
2,304
725
5,500
5,608
25,786
0
46,977
This Calendar Year to Date: S81,771,093
Last Calendar Year to Date:
This
Calandar
Yr/Date
28
76
5
38
147
1161
81,771,093
389,960
766
66,434
587
70,689
476
32,146
2990
559,229
VALUATION
556,457
0
0
163,713
0
27,000
70,649
18,000
109,665
86,298
2,290,834
0
3,322,616
"r-
I-
Z
0
0
rJ
0
"!'
~=
Z
o
0 ¢,D 0 0
0 ¢~1 0 0
If) ~-, 0 ~'-
0 0 0 ~!'
0 0 0 ~"
c~ o o ~
o
0
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Dave F. Dixon, City Council
Gary Thornhill
September 19, 1991
General Plan Status Report
Attached, please find the Status Report from The Planning Center on the
Temecula General Plan Program June 7, 1991 through September 18, 1991.
CITY OF TEMECULA General Ran Program
On July 2, 1991, The Planning Center received a signed contract authorization to begin work
on the General Plan Program. However, our work efforts began in early June after the City
Council selected The Planning Center as the prime consultant and approved the Scope of
Work. To date we have completed Phase I and are finishing Phases II and III of the Work
Program.
PHASE I
Project Kickoff includes completion of the following tasks and work products:
The Project Guidance Package and the Public Participation Program for Citizens and
City Officials which provide the framework for the 15 month General Plan process;
The General Plan Master Meeting and Products Schedule which provide a detailed
listing of the work products and meetings associated with each Phase of the Work
Program;
The Preliminary Vision Statement;
The first Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop to review the schedule,
General Plan Process, and Vision Statement;
A General Plan Information Center is in the local library to promote public
understanding and a General Plan Correspondence Log for recording inquiries and
comments received by the public; and
A master mailing List for notifying interested citizens and others about upcoming
public meetings.
PHASE II
Data Collection, Research and Analysis includes the following tasks which are
completed or currently under preparation:
Completion of a field reconnaissance of the community, interviews with individual
Planning Commission and City Council Members, and data collection and research for
the Existing Conditions Report/Master Environmental Assessment.
Wilbur Smith & Associates has set-up and linked the City's new traffic model with the
County's new Southwest District Traffic Model.
2
Phase
The consultant team is currently completing the first draft of the Existing Conditions
Report which includes technical analysis on economic/fiscal conditions, baseline traffic
conditions, noise and air quality, and public services and utilities.
It is anticipated that this report will be added to and refined throughout several phases
of the process as new information becomes available.
Completion of the base map for the presentation-size graphics and report-size graphics
for the General Plan and we are in the process of obtaining an aerial photo of the
study area.
III
Issue/Opportunity Area Analysis includes the following tasks which are completed or
currently under preparation:
Completion of four Neighborhood Meetings, which were artended by approximately
75 persons, to obtain input on issues, opportunities, and community vision.
Preparation of a Summary of Issues that provided a comprehensive listing of all
issues/opportunities raised to date, which will be distributed for the Joint Planning
Commission/City Council Workshop on October 10th. The Issues Summary is being
refined and used in the preparation of preliminary goals and policies of the General
Plan.
A Goals and Policies Workbook is currently being drafted which is intended to assist
City Officials in formulating goals and policies for the General Plan. Based on the
issues analysis and Existing Conditions Report on Opportunities and Constraints Map
will be prepared for the October 10 joint workshop.,
The first Public Workshop/Town Hall Meeting is scheduled for October 29, 1991.
General Plan Issue Papers will soon be under preparation which will examine in greater
detail those issues that are most critical to the community. The Issue Papers are
Scheduled to be completed in Mid November, 1991.
THE PLANNING CENTER
Ib~plan%lM,mud%memo%GPotatCC
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DEPART54'F~NTAL REPORT
..,e Sports Park Restroom/Snack Bar Project will begin construction on October 1, 1991 and should be completed
by November 30. The completion of the Restroom/Snack Bar will provide a more sanitary environment for the
thousands of recreation participants that use Sports Park, as well as enhance the aesthetics of the park.
Phase I and Phase 1I of the Sports Park Ballfield Lighting Project is now completed. These improvements have
created six (6) lighted fields with advanced glare shields that have significantly reduced spill light associated with night
usage. We can now accommodate five (5) night baseball/softball games and two (2) night soccer games. Without
the installation of these lights, we would have not been able to accommodate the youth and adult recreation needs in
the City
Conceptual drawings of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) and various park sites will be brought to the
attention of the Board of Directors within the next (60) days. These drawings will be used to develop construction
drawings and specifications for the formal bid process.
On Saturday, September 21, 1991, the TCSD will host a Fall Women's Slo-Pitch Softball Tournament. The
tournament will be held at the Sports Park beginning at 9:00 a.m. Women's teams of all levels of competition are
encouraged to register at the TCSD office on or before September 17th. The registration fee is $160.00 per team.
TCSD staff continually receives and monitors soccer field reservations for the Temecula Valley Youth Soccer
Association. An estimated 2,000 youngsters in Temecula are registered and participating in the TVSA Soccer
~ogram which practices and plays games at the Sports Park.
~,,;ats are still available for an upcoming TCSD excursion south of the border. The TCSD will sponsor a guided day
tour to Rosarita Beach Mexico, on Saturday, September 21st. The transportation will be aboard a comfortable
Sundance Stage Coach bus. The tour also includes a lobster dinner at a well established local restaurant. This
exciting day tour is being offered for the low price of $48.00 per person.
The TCSD is also taking reservations for a t.h~ee day, two night Laughlin, Nevada Casino Tour. The tour is
scheduled for October 27, 28 and 291h. Overmght accommodations will be at the beautiful new Flamingo Hilton.
The exciting fun filled tour is being offered at the low cost of only $80.00 per person.
The TCSD continues to offer a wide variety of special interest classes. Fall classes will begin the 2nd week of
October. Ceramics, Modeling, Gymnastics, Watercolor Painting, T-Shirt Painting and Tap Dance are just a few of
the wonderful classes available.
Mommy and Me classes are held every Friday morning at the Temecula Town Association. The classes are for
parents with tots between the ages of 2 and 5 years of age. Each week youngsters will participate in sing-a-long,
crafts, games, and meet a special guest character. The class meets from 9:00 a.m. to 10:45 a.m. The fee is $2.00
per child each visit.
On October 241h and 251h, the TCSD will offer Halloween Craft Classes for youngsters ages 6 to 12 years. The
classes will be held at Temecula Elementary School in the auditorium, both days from 2:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Refreshments will be provided for all in attendance. The fee is $3.00 per child.
'the City Volunteer Program has currently registered over 40 Temecula residents to assist in community services.
Volunteers through this program have been assigned to work at the Police Department, City Clerks Office, Recreation
Programs, and many other areas in the community.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD AUGUST 27, 1991
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:42
PM in the Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive,
Temecula, California. President J. Sal Mu~oz presiding.
PRESENT 4 DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Moore
Also present were City Manager/General Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field,
and City Clerk/District Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, addressed the Board of Directors speaking in favor
of establishing a City Park in the northeast section of the City.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve the minutes
of August 13, 1991. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Moore
absent.
Donation of Property - Wet of Gilberto Road
Director of Community Services, Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. He advised
that the Parks and Recreation Commission had unanimously recommended that the
Board of Directors accept this donation of property.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
2.1
Accept donation of 2.8 acre property located west of Via Gilberto Road
from Silverwood and H. R. Remington Properties.
The motion was unanimously carried with Director Moore absent.
Minutes\8/27/91 - 1 - O9/17/91
Temecula Community Services District Minutes August 27, 1991 '
Award of Bid - California Landscape Inc. for Parks and Slopes
Director of Community Services, Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
3.1
Award bid to California Landscape Inc., to provide landscaping services
to TCSD Parks and Slope areas.
The motion was unanimously carried with Director Moore absent.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
No report given.
BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
Director Birdsall reported that she will be attending a Community Services Planning
Division of the League of California Cities meeting during September, and that she has
been asked to serve on the Helen Putnam Award Committee for the League of Cities
Annual Meeting in October.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 8:54
PM to a meeting to be held on September 10, 1991, 8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula
Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California. The motion
was unanimously carried with Director Moore absent.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mur~oz, President
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Community
Services District Secretary
Minutes\8127191 -2- 09/17/91
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1991
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:31
PM.
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mur~oz
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S.
Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CSD BUSINESS
1. ADOointment Of Seven (7) Member Parks and Recreation Technical Committee
Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, introduced the staff report,
recommending that Sal Mu~oz, President of the Board of Directors, be appointed
Chairman of this committee; and Pat Birdsall, Liaison for the Parks and Recreation
Commission, and Mike Kirby, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission also
be appointed to this Committee. It was further recommended that four additional
members and one alternative be appointed.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to approve staff
recommendation. The motion was unanimously carried.
Director Lindemans spoke in favor of appointing Laverne Stafford and Norma
Matkovick. Director Moore spoke in favor of Tom Langley and George Campos.
Director Birdsall spoke in favor of Barbara Pearson. Director Parks spoke in favor of
appointing Tom Langley and Bill Perlett. President Mur~oz spoke in favor of Christy
Varella and Lettie Boggs.
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Birdsall to appoint Laverne
Stafford to the Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee. The motion was
unanimously carried.
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to appoint Barbara
Pearson to the Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee. The motion was
unanimously carried.
4/Minute s/O91091 - 1 - 09/18/91
CSD Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Birdsall to appoint George
Campos. President Mu~oz expressed concerns that the recommended operational
guidelines prohibit membership on more than one commission or committee. Mr.
Campos presently serves on the Sports Council and the Airport Commission.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES: 2 DIRECTORS: Moore, Birdsall
NOES: 3 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Parks, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to appoint Bill Perlett
to the Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks, Birdsall
AYES: 4
NOES: I DIRECTORS: Moore
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Director Moore explained she feels this committee needs someone with knowledge of
sports.
It was moved by President Mu~oz, seconded by Director Lindemans to appoint Lettie
Boggs to the Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee. The motion was
unanimously carried.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to appoint Tom Langley
as alternate to the Parks and Recreation Technical Sub-Committee. The motion was
unanimously carried.
Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year
ended June 30, 1991
Shawn Nelson introduced the staff report.
Director Parks asked what
improvements. Mr. Nelson
improvements.
the dollar amount being carried over for capital
reported $270,000 is being carried over for these
4/Minutes/O91 O91 -2- O9/1 8191
.... CSD Minutes Sentember 10, 1991
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to approve staff
recommendations as follows:
2.1
2.2
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1991 and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 1991.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 91-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
BUDGET AS DETAILED IN ATTACHMENT "A"
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mu~oz
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: None
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
Mr. Nelson reported that over 2,000 children are participating in the Youth Soccer Program
this year, and thanked the Temecula Valley Soccer Association for the outstanding job they
are performing.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Parks requested the Parks and Recreation staff put together a list of small projects
that service groups can perform for the City.
4/Minutee/091091 -3- 09/18/91
CSD Minutes Seotember 10, 1991
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Birdsall to adjourn at 8:58 PM to a
meeting on September 24, 1991 at 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, TCSD Secretary
J. Sal Mur~oz, President
4/Minutes/091091 -4- 09/18/91
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON
SEPTEMBER 24, 1991
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE
SERVICES FOR CIP PROJECTS
ARCHITECTURAL
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Appoint Robert E. Brotherton Architect/The Alhambra Group to provide conceptual
architectural services for the Community Recreation Center and conceptual landscape
architectural services for undeveloped city park sites.
FISCAL IMPACT: Costs to provide the architectural and landscape
architectural services are $14,250.00. Unencumbered funds exist in account #019-
190-999-42-5248.
DISCUSSION: On July 22, 1991, the TCSD released a Request For
Qualifications and proposals to architectural and landscape architectural firms to
provide conceptual schematic drawings for the Community Recreation Center (CRC)
and undeveloped city park sites. These parks include the park site on Pala Road
(Rawhide), the park site on Riverton Street, and Sam Hicks Monument Park.
The conceptual drawings will include schematic site plans, schematic floor plans,
schematic exterior elevations, a colored exterior elevation, and a probable cost
estimate. We plan on receiving extensive public input through community workshops
and Parks and Recreation Commission meetings. The public will comment concerning
several design issues i.e. the floor plan of the CRC; type of community pool; passive
and active uses at various park sites. After the schematic drawings have completed
the review process, the drawings will be presented to the Board of Directors for final
approval.
A total of four proposals were submitted for consideration and after review by staff,
the top two firms were invited for an interview process. A selection committee was
formed to review the qualifications and experience of the final two architectural firms.
The committee members included Pat Birdsall from the Board of Directors; Evelyn
Harker from the Parks and Recreation Commission; Gary Thornhill, Gary King, and
myself.
As a result of the interview process, the selection committee unanimously
recommended Robert E. Brotherton Architects/The Alhambra Group to provide the
conceptual services for the TCSD. Once the schematic drawings are approved, the
next phase will be to develop construction plans and specifications for the formal bid
process.
Enclosed in a copy of the proposal submitted by Robert E. Brotherton Architects/The
Alhambra Group for your review.
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19_,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
Robert Brotherton & Assoc. , hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth
in Exhibit A.
PERFOR2vIANCE. Consultant shall at all times, tiithfully, industrially and to
the best of his abi.lity, experienc.e and talent, perform all tasks described
herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates
set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the
above tasks. This mount will not exceed $14,250.00 for the total term of
the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council;
provided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to
exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than
$10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invokes monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the fLrst business day of each month,
for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within
thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT.
The City may, at any time, suspend, teEam or abandon this Agreement, or
any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise.
Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the
City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is to be
ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
2/fom~IAGR-(M.
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or
duty. to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the
date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described
herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure
by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if
such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall
serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall
have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the
default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any
other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this
Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on , 19_, and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in
no event later than , 19_.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech
thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The
arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to .California Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1280, ¢t seq. City and Consultant shall share the cost of
the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the
event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all
original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of
providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall
become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise
disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
~fotn~/AGR..04 2
10.
11.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor
any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of
the Consultant or any of the Consultant' s officers, employees or agents, except
as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner
officers, employees or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for
compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the perlbrmance of its service pursuant to
this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all
such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not
be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on
the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager
of the City of Temecula, located at 43 172 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92390 and the Consultant at RBA Z76Z0 Commerce Center Dr.
Ste. 103 Temecula, CA 9Z590unless and until different addresses may be
furnished in writing by either. party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to
have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in
the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of
notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any pan thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the
prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
the value to the City of the services rendered.
2/fonmtAGR-04 3
12.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance
acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this
contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder
by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than
A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid.
The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form
number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General
Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA 01301 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California an Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance
no less than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: Sl,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers'
compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. $1,000,000. per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City.
~form~AGR-04 4
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that covera,,e shall not be suspended, voided,
cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability coverages. The City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the
Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant. The coverage shall contain no Special limitations on the
scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the
Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials,
employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The
insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses
arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City.
~onn~AGP,-04 5
13.
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the fight to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured re.tentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless
the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from
and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of
any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may
sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them t'or injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
performance under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising
out of the sole negligence of the City.
14.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the-subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from
and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
2/formMAGR-04 6
k'q WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By
Title
Ronald l. Parks, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATI'EST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
2/formi/AGR-O,4. 7
EXHIBIT A: SPORTS PARK RECREATIONAL CENTER; RIVERTON PARK;
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK; RAWHIDE PARKS
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
SCOPE OF WORK: By RBA Architects- Sports Park Recreational Center
PROGRAMING
Establish in conjunction with City staff
requirements for both site and structures.
an outline of the project
spatial/functional
FLOW DIAGRAMS
From the above agreed to programing requirements produce bubble diagrams which
address:
a. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic flow to and thru the site.
b.Adjacency requirements of facilities on the site.
c.Adjacency requirements of each area within the structures.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN STUDIES
Prepare conceptual design studies from the above approved flow diagrams. Studies
shall include overall site development, structures, and floor plans. From the above
studies prepare a preliminary schematic design to include the following:
a. Schematic site plan for recreational center
b. Schematic floor plan of all structures
c. A Schematic exterior elevation on all structures including one colored elevation.
d. Prepare an estimate of probable project budget based on a square foot analysis.
page 1
EXHIBIT A: SPORTS PARK RECREATIONAL CENTER;
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK; RAWHIDE PARKS
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
RIVERTON PARK;
SCOPE OF WORK; By The Alhambra Group
Preparation of Conceptual Park Site Development Plans for each of the following based
on location maps included in RFP (4-6-90):
Riverton Park - 4.98 acres
Sam hicks Monument Park - .83 acres
Rawhide Park - Rawhide Park 30.44acres
1. Prepare Base sheets @ Appropriate Scale. (1 "=20' to 1 "=40').
2. Site analysis and site observation as required to developed concepts.
3. Development of design criteria utilizing park use input from CSD staff and other
SOUFCeS.
4. Conceptual landscape site development plan for review and comment by CSD staff.
5. Preliminary Budget Estimate.
6. Meeting as required with the city staff
7. Presentation to the City Staff and Parks Commission, or City Council as required.
8. One (1) colored conceptual drawing plan for presentation.
page 2
EXHIBIT
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK; RAWHIDE PARKS
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE: Sports Park Recreational Center
RBA proposes to perform the above scope of work for the lump sum of
FEE SCHEDULE: Compensation will be billed monthly on a % of completion
for each phase as follows:
B: SPORTS PARK RECREATIONAL CENTER; RIVERTON PARK;
Programming Phase
Flow Diagrams
Conceptual Design
$6,000.00
2,500.00
1,000.00
2,500.00
Total $6,000.00
The above fee does not include the following
Any civil or soils engineering or any governmental fees.
Any structural, electrical, mechanical, or plumbing engineering.
Any blueprinting or any other reproduction costs required for the City of
Temecula approvals and/or Owner's use.These items shall be billed as a
reimbursable expense, in addition to the basic fee.
page 1
EXHIBIT
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK; RAWHIDE PARKS
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE: Sports Park Recreational Center
Alhambra Group proposes to perform the above scope of work
for the lump sum of
FEE SCHEDULE: Compensation will be billed monthly on a % of completion
for each phase as follows:
B: SPORTS PARK RECREATIONAL CENTER; RIVERTON PARK;
Riverton Park:
Sam Hicks Monument Park:
Rawhide Park:
The above fee does not include the following:
1.
2.
3.
$8,250.00
$2,600.00
$2,050.00
$3,600.00
Any civil or soils engineering or any governmental fees.
Any structural, electrical, mechanical, or plumbing engineering.
Any blueprinting or any other reproduction costs required for City of
Temecula approvals and/or Owner's use. These items shall be billed as
reimbursable expense, in addition to the basic fee.
TOTAL COMPENSATION- SPORTS PARK RECREATIONAL
CENTER AND THREE PARK SITES
$14,250.00
page 2
EXHIBIT B: SPORTS PARK RECREATIONAL CENTER; RIVERTON PARK;
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK; RAWHIDE PARKS
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
PRINCIPAL
PROJECT ARCHITECT
ARCH./DESIGNER
ARCH./DRAFTER
TYPIST
INTERIOR DESIGNER MNGR.
INTERIOR DESIGNER
$90.00
$65.00
$55.00
$40.00
$40.00
$65.00
$60.00
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
1. Project related auto mileage shall be billed at $0.25 per mile.
Services, materials & equipment not covered in the rate schedule above shall
be billed at cost + 15% unless otherwise noted in the contract.
Overtime services performed at the clients request shall be charged at 1.5 x
hourly rate noted above unless otherwise noted in the contract.
Consultants employed on a clients behalf shall be charged at cost + 15%
unless otherwise noted in the contract.
5. Billing rates are subject to charge every 6 months from date of contract
Printing costs for all prints (except for in-house coordination with Architects
consultants) shall be billed at commercial printing rates for blueprints,
plotting, mylars, sepias, and xerographic copies.
page 3
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
SEPTEMBER 24, 1991
RESOLUTION APPROVING EXISTING USER FEES
PREPARED BY: Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Directors:
1)
Conduct a public hearing regarding approving the existing schedule of
Parks and Recreation facilities reservation fees; and
2) Adopt Resolution 91-_ establishing of a schedule of parks and
recreation facilities reservation fees.
DISCUSSION:
On August 12, 1991, the Parks and Recreation Commission approved and
recommended the Board of Directors approve the Park Use Ordinance and Resolution
Establishing Park Use Fees. The Resolution incorporates the same fees approved by
the Board of Directors on December 18, 1990. The fees have been established to
enhance participation of youth and adult sports leagues, non-profit community
organizations and community residents. If approved, the resolution will become
effective concurrent with the park use ordinance considered on the City Council
Agenda.
ATTACHMENT:
Resolution - Park Use Fees
Reservation Fee Schedule
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A
SCHEDULE OF EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITY
RESERVATION FEES
WHEREAS, Section 1 of Ordinance No. 91-__ provides that persons or groups may
reserve use of parks and recreation facilities upon obtaining a "Use Permit" and paying all
applicable fees;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Use Permit fees for parks and recreation facilities shall be
levied in accordance with the City of Temecula Community Services District Parks and
Recreation Facilities Reservation Fee Schedule, hereby incorporated as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. The provisions of this resolution shall take effect concurrent
with the effective date of City Ordinance No. 9 1-__.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTF~D this 10th day of September, 1991.
ATTEST:
J. Sat Mu~oz, President
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Community Services District Secretary
2\r~sos\CSD 003 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution CSD 91--- was duly adopted by
the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting
thereof, held on the __ day of September, 1991 by the following vote of the Board:
AYES: DIRECTOR:
NOES: DIRECTOR:
ABSENT: DIRECTOR:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Community Services District Secretary
2\reao,~\CSD 003 2
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
Temecula Community Services District
Parks and Recreation Facilities
Reservation Fee Schedule
Fee Payment:
The fees applicable to the use of facilities are contained herein and are due and payable
at the TCSD office (72) hours prior to the use of that facility.
GROUP
I II III IV
A,
Softball/Baseball Field*
NO FIELD PREPARATION
No Lights
Lighted
0 0 0 12.00
0 5.00 12.00 20.00
Soccer/Football Field*
NO FIELD PREPARATION
No Lights
Lighted
0 0 0 12.00
0 5.00 12.00 20.00
C,
Tournaments/Sports Clinics
(per field per day)
NO FIELD PREPARATION
0 0 75.00 150.00
D. A $5.00 Administrative fee will be charged for processing refunds!
Es
Individuals who do not reside within the boundaries of the City of Temecula registering for a TCSD
sponsored activity or facility will be subject to a $10.00 per person non-residency fee.
* Fees listed herein are on an hou~y basis per group, per field unless otherwise noted.
ITEM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON
SEPTEMBER 24, 1991
PARK PROPERTY ON LA SERENA WAY
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Defer any decisions concerning the intended use of the property on La Serena Way
until the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is completed.
DISCUSSION: On September 18, 1990, the Board of Directors directed
staff to prepare the necessary documents to accept a 3.47 acre property on La Serena
Way and enter negotiations concerning the possibility of leasing the property to the
Ridgeview Homeowners Association for a Christmas Tree Farm.
On November 5, 1990, a staff report was prepared recommending that the Board of
Directors accept the La Serena property and reserve its use as open space until the
Parks and Recreation Master Plan was completed. This recommendation was
unanimously approved by the City Council.
This site has been identified as a potential equestrian trail due to a Metropolitan Water
district easement that runs transversely through the site that could link this property
to northern trails in the City. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan is scheduled to
be completed within six (6) months.
On September 9, 1991, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to the
Board of Directors to defer any discussions concerning the use of this property until
the completion of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. On September 16, 1991,
the Planning Commission also recommended that this site be left as open space until
the completion of the master plan.
Enclosed is background information concerning this property for your review.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
,4 GENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
David F. Dixon, City Manager
November 5, 1990
Acceptance of Donated Proper'L'y
Prepared By: Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director
RECOMMENDATiON:
That the City Council accept donated property containing
Metropolitan Water District Easement for possible future
park development.
RSCAL IMPACT.'
No fiscal impact due to Ehe property being donated.
However, if developed, monies will need to be budgeted for
maintenance and operaZion.
DISCUSSION:
On September 18, 1990, ~he City Council authorized staff to execute ~e necessary
paperwork to accept this donated property containing a Metropolitan Water District
Easement for possible future park development. This undeveloped, narrow parcel on
La Serena Way could be integrated into a city-wide trails system that will be designed
when the Parks and RecreaZion Master Plan is completed.
CSD Minu~es
4. Accel;?tance of Donated Prooerty
November :27, 1990';'
Shown Nelson, Director of Community Services, stated this parcel contains'a
Metropolitan Water District Easement, and said it is north of La Serena Way,
between the La Serena and Ridgeview Developments. He recommended the
Board accept this donated property and hold it until completion of the City-wide
master plan. He explained this property could possibly be used as a part of a
City-wide bike path and trail system.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Mu~oz to accept
donation of property (3.47 acres) located off La Serena Way, containing a
Metropolitan Water District Easement for possible future park development.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
None
None
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RE3oDRT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REj~ORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REJ~ORTS
None given.
12ZO6~IO
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT '~' mr, L,'rcH
T~M~CULA PARK
~/O TRACT NO eoaal
t
City Council Minute /.-//SeDte/mber i 8/i990
' ~ Deletlate ~rrLeague o(~California ~~~nnual
16. ~e~erence
~mber o ~ems before e general membership. The'League has as/k.e~ each
emanJved, Counc~e~ember Mu~oz ~a toorio
to appoin ayor Parks o serve as delegate and CounG~"~member Birdsall
i/ serve a Itemate
· rried by the fo wing vote: / '
AYES: 5 COUNCL EMERS: irdsall, Lind ans, Moo ,
I ition of Park Lan~CILMEMB : NMou~Zz, Park
ABSEisT: 0 COUNC LM R e .
17. Acou' ' ' . . . . ·
City Manager Dixon recommended staff pursue acquisition of property offered
by Bedford Properties. He also stated that Metropolitan Water District does
have right-of-way for their pipelines on this property.
Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 9:15 PM. The meeting
was reconve..n...ed at 9:17 PM.
Joe Pribanic, 30929 Calla Pina Colada, stated he is in oldposition of the City
acquiring this property for use as a public park. He said the topography of this
land does not lend itself to a park. He stated property owners have had trouble
with drugs and vandalism in this area and the strip of land would be virtually
impossible to patrol. He asked that the Council not accept this property.
John Cloughen, 4130~, Bravos Court, Secretary/Treasurer of the Ridgeview
Homeowners Association, stated the homeowners are opposed to this property
being used as a City park. He advised the City Council that the Ridgeview
Homeowners Association has been offered this property by Bedford Properties
for development of a tree farm for a joint venture with La Serena Home Owners
Association.
Ninuzes\8\18\gO
-~3- 0912~190
City Council Minutes
Seotember 18.1990
James Donar~, 41300 Bravos Court, said this proper~y must have a road
maintained down the center for access by the Metropolitan Water District. He
also stated that due to the configuration of this land, it is very difficult to
supervise and asked that the Cit~, Council not acquire this land for use as a
park.
Jim Willlame, 27425 Ynez Road, stated he seconded even/thing that has been
said before him.
Terry Cordell, 41284 Bra~/os Court, objected to public use of this property
stating it cannot be supervised and he has had problems in the past with
vandalism.
Kim Muscato, 41365 Bravos Court, stated she is also in opposition to this land
becoming a City Park.
Karin Pavlovsky, 30911 White Rocks, President of the Ridgeview Homeowners
Association, stated the association has voted to suppor~ the cooperative
development of this site as a tree farm. She stated the association is in
opposition to staff's proposal. She also said it would not be appropriate for
Bedford to receive credit for a park for this unusable property.
Councilmember. Birdsall asked if a representative c~f the La Serena Homeowners
Association is present. Mr. Cloughen said that there is not a representative
tonight, but he met with the association and they favor the joint venture for a
tree farm.
Councilmember Mu~oz suggested the Cit~ acquire this land and lease it back
to the homeowners association at a nominal fee. This would enable the City
to obtain open space which is needed also. By doing this it would serve both
needs.
Councilmember Lindemans said the Cit~ is in desperate need of parks but
stated the City needs to purchase usable land.
Councilmember Moore expressed the desire to use this land for possible
walking and bike trails or a skate board park.
Mayor Parks said that he understands this site has been used for many years
been a nuisance to the surrounding properW owners and stated he felt it would
be be~er to allow the homeowners association to have this particular piece of
land.
llt flutes\8\18\9~3 :' - 16- 0912~1rI0
City Council Minutes
September 18.199Q '
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to direct staff to pursue acquisition of the property offered by Bedford
Properties with the provision that the City will enter into negotiations to sub-
lease the property to the Ridgeview Homeowners Association for an undefined
period of time.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz
NOES: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Parks asked that the Council reorder the agenda and that Item No. 18 be
a. Safety a ~otnrn Zrvi
e~enartrnent Positions
· ,.
then filled. e'stated is neec upon ~uic ~aa the new
' ' '1 ;work ~ay ~ ~ 24,
Co limerob irdsall ~ ~ ~ s~con
NO.
A THE CITY' THE
THE ESTA
and City Ma~ to fill al unity
Services De as rec~ staI
Iqi nutea,\8\18VKi
- I 5-
AU~:~Si. IS ~qq:
C'ity cf Temscula
AZzn: City Council
45i74 Susiness P.aTk Drive
Temecula: C:A .=-,=c..-
;:;,.~_a,r C3u~qci!merz;DeF'c:
O,,'er C:ne lash year' our' Dca, c: of dzi'ecccrs a. iCFig} ~ji'Ci~,
one F/iCgevie'~.~ ~c.T, eowners..,':-,.sen., r, as been discussing a
p:'-o:acsai with a potential lessee tc coins. ider
bossibilisies cf using the ur. impro'.,ed acreage '.aetHeen the
Ridgavie~ and La Serena Homeo~nei~s (:~ssociations az an area to
fa:-m cress. The particulars ere an~eveicped. Our bcarC had
Deer attempting to finc scme id=~ "'mac ~ouiC put :he land
to gooC use ~...~ichod: cornpromising our- non-profit status or the
~elfare of Zhe residents of the trac:. Far this reason the
prc':,oss. l b. Jas. welcomed.. . iZ seemed t.'.-~at
Christmas :r'ee far:T, cn Zhis ~'roDerty coulC be :.mplemented, 2n
a manner chat ~.;odld be beneficial or, both .sou rite.
:'here are 25.5 acres. 3f land t.o be cor~s',/.cered on the
part. -= La Serena. -'i E, acres that. abu.:
aCreS ~ha~ se-ve 8. s a Duffer bet~eer. the ner't:ncrr. incFres c-f
Setera and the ~ieaCa~,~ie~ h . s above them. This land,
o;qe
sisLing uP, used ~ has been ti-DbbiesDFne:
r,as ~ee.r, a.r~ e tea ~r, ere c;qi 'lcrei", ~:.nc~ .sGu!ts,
3~ r.h~ coFmur;i:.>' nave _qDr',e Co pitch Cents, s-'~oks. ci~s.,ettBs
ant, upon occasion. use dr'.u.gs.; l: 1s espec_jall> co:..vanient.
_ ' ' i Fn "" O S
~..ecs. use= t is ',,'=i':uail'y' ~ _
D';ac5 there because of th:s ~esic',r, o'~ :he trast.> ~'= fe':ncss
[that obstruct the vie~ :o Chat ar'ea- anc~ L;ne fact :ha: the
i~e~da~vie~ homes are sitting hia'aer up ~iLF. their home:-
backing up the oDeR
I.,~e nave had several fires as. a result of the misuse of
~=' While they na~e noc beer, serious cney s.s:r,,/e
,_. pr,Dperr, y.
ss~ reminCer t. hs:
~ ,_r'B is a;i-, ~bo~e-&v'era.ge cmar;cs tha, t a
, ~re could occur, endangering tme homes and pr-operty
surrounding r.~i5 e, rea. This oper, space is kept.in a natural
su- .... , and ~e dc disc it annually; however we believe that
using it ia a mannar tPa: ~ouid i--stain the .-' n-be f
, ~ree it e.sl
and reduce the fin5 hazard that exist5 in i:s present stale
~=- to everyone 5 benefit
Debt. or ar, d .na.v. 5 it m&inLairne.~ ~,.:!zr,. a, g.,.c=ai mu, ra: ,.DKCZlLCi I,.'e
i. Ran simDl.x, L~eec; abat. emen:.~ it. seems ihai EF,=5: wo,a!c~ '.De m.Dr'e
Deneficiai to all Dar'cie~ conc:err~eC. Financially, La Ser'er',a
~ou!d Densfit Dy having ins adCitional euncs SPareferred
tract enhancemer, Z ~rcm the elimination of CDEtS no,,.~ CirecteQ
~" both La g~,'e:na and
to ~eeC a'.Datemer. t, etc. Physica_~
Meado~vie~; ~obiC Densfit as using this green-belt 'For fari.~inS
Christmas treez ~ouic'. serve as a greater visual and sound
buffer ~.~hiie Dmc.yidinp the at. iliLy tc better
pmopenty ~rom Dcter~tial fire,
~Qe unCerstand that. Dy a 4-I 'joSe mace in September
by the Cit:y Ccumci!. t. he Cecleion had Deer made to have
easemenc belt in ~eed by cr, e city. It ~as then LD De !easec
fon $I.00 pen Veac Dank LO tree Ric~evie;.,~ ALan. ~:!! c.~ the
aoove mer~EioneC ]an~ cou!C r.;nen De u~ed ~or' 's',-,e farmLn~
CP, risLmas srees. In, hincsight~ ~;e should h,3. v~. taker. a 'none
asseTLive e,t~mC on Denai~ of ca Sen'erda im veicin~ Dun' supi.~ort
~or the use o~ :his lan~ as a Christmas tree farm prior
tme vole ann in the ~oiio~-u~ ~erea~ter. ~,~e ~e!t at zne
time~ however, znat ~e hac little to o~fer in the ~ay o~
adding amy insight due Zo the fact that talks ~ith the
interested lessee had been ~ith Ric~evie~ and, ~ollo~,:iDg the
vote o~ the Cit7 Council, ~e believed the ~rame~crk had been
sol to Droceec.
'...~e l^~ere a~are that one of the Ricgevieb~ nomeov.~ners hat!
spoken eL',% ~:~a,i:nsr. ~.mi5 ;Drc['osal in October 1990, D.]t .... ~e cid
r, oZ think chat cnis ~,~culd air. or' the decision, passed the
Drevio'ws mon:h by the City Council. We ~,~ere satiseiec'. that
adenunto research h. ae been done by the RiCge~,.ie~ ~qesn.
regarc~ing~ Z~e '.;iat-iiity of the davelcDme;qt cf a Christmas
tree farm ant i~:s implications to us.
~,.2e Lock the position that it. ~ouid be ap~,;opriaZe LD
alj. c~. zhe F:.i~'~,': el..~ ~esr, t.c: nan ~,a Drocesl of ;~eveioDinc
terms, to be cc=mr. ice.:-ec' unri. i more conc'-ete Cetaiis
place since Ric'~evie~ i-,8C
lessees -.-,/'varic,~~ city' aaencie3 from
that o,nze a ~ii-defir~ec Diem
a]t the facto;-s and ~e.~ctiate ~rcm Lha: point~ if r~ecessary,
and proseed accordingly.
From the perspective of Zhe board of La Serena, ar'!d as
members of the community at large, we ackno~led_ce the r',eed
for' the city co acquire land fcr public use, be it for' a
oral! sS.'stem or a mcr-e ccnvenziona! park, Hot~ever, ;~s have
concerns that ~e ~eel need to be addressed, namely:
(:q) There are 3 isrivate parks in the La Serena tract
itself, some of ~hich are already being used .~y people other'
than those ~no re-=.iOe in the tract. This misuse may incresse
snou!d 'you cecide to ceveiop the area in ~des'zion as DUDiiC
lane Tf you fell t~a+ -~z cOu~ be sol,,e~ b'y cuilCinc sDme
':../~e c'f ~.J.~:i. cD"is_,ce,
h~:,eC~L..~:'~g:'E ~", : LCaE.'q~t~ whose ~:.~;c: :vs rCE &' 9 E~F~S_C~.' ~'
~.,;iOLI~n: L r on fences. ,
have invested in, land
spaciausr, ess ~.jnlcn ~il l
~311s. scarf being erecCe~,
(B) Vete:a,n's Park is icesLed vir'tc!al!y ac,"oss La
kay from the area being proposed as a potential city
;ark/ti'ai:.. i,.:itn the eiin':inatioc~ o'F bus tr,~nsDor-tation tc
:h~ children ~.~nc live ~icnin a !.5 mile racius of scr.;ool,
there v~iit be many eiemenza:'/SChDoi chileTen ,.~aikinG to
P, ancho Elemenza=ry. Coral-Jet' :he arnoun: cf :cedes. crier, and
· vehicular' Cr-affic slr'eady reQresenzed in
nc'c De betze;- to allc~.,, fur a
31ore Deepie to Chit DarCicular sCr-e~cn cf 'one city?
(Or) You r,.s..,: consice. :ha :possibility cf ciaimin.~
gr'een-bel: area tnas e:!<iscs DotNe:sM ~a
under imminent. Comair,. Ne feel ~.n:-; ~doul.: :De unK'.iss because
you Nould be ceclaring :his area for' DuDlie use despite
limited visibility and no vehicular access. Derna~s resultir~,~
in security ~rsblems for she residen~s of La Setera and
i'leaCo~vie~. if there ~as ever' an emergency. be
fire, access Dy the appropriate city departments ~ou!d be
minimal a: bee:. The Green-belt area ends aZ the rear
DounCany of Rancho Elementary. bringing ~ fur't~er
considerations. i.e. security of llfe arc:
The pr'oDcseG figures Ne have r-e.c, ai'ding ,ucney be't,/.jeen urns
associatjon an~ :no potential lessee (a,DD--cximate!y e16.7 per
acre per year for the first S yeasts a,,n: then $500 z. cr acre
per year thereafter) represents monogamy b, er, e:-i:, al:.hcugh
feel that in r~c ~ay could this be considered a "windfall."
dould like ;.o have the chance zo use :.his money ~o up.~race
an~ enhance *~ tract it: ~,.;a'.-.'s t:-~at v:oulc'. r:s~ or I~
..... ~ , v benefit
r'esident~,~ be: also :.he c!t. 3,. Adr:'.,iZ3edl~. L~ Serene,
attracZl'..e than 9the: tracts iF. Ter,-~ecul&. This
~a;-: to its .'else/re s-~e. ar, c ~erAaDs she lack of vision of
sayiieF DOa;"C.S. ~,~e have t;een ':r'}in~ Z3 rectify ':hie
;3u: i: is a slc~,: process Cue lar'GieLy :c limited
DLL COU~tS,
You may entertain the thought ,of havinL: the city lease
the land Lo th= individuals into:sated in using the ar~=a :o
'Farm ChFistn;as Cress. if you do not claim the ,green-belt
area ur'ider imminent ~omair,, you prevent us f,-on'~ Doing able
fulfill cur desire to use it ~ieely because cf the lack cf
access. If you do claim the green-belt area, you leave us
vulnerable to all the potential hazards addressed above.
Finally, ~e are certain your intentions ate motivated ',:y
good ~i!l. Unfortunately, Ne have no idea if future council-
members Nill :e so motivated. Nnile t. ne same may De saiC fc.r
Lne various Dear'de invclvec;.. the association b. oar'l!s ~',i!!,
cnan~-''-'= ~-~1~ i .Lf'..=ec' t',~=e u-E.E c:f a.s-2. o-i-'- = r~ ci..~ez z.f
!iyinc i.r, cu~' tr'.XCT...
L-~e incenc to ci:'cw1ar. e
and resiCenZs. and ~e ~,.~il! formate a copy ~o you upon its
completion- in closing, I ~culd like the City Cour. ci! to
under'stan,S :hal :he E;oard of E;ir'ectors of :.ha La C.e,'ena
Homeo~ners ~ssociation suppOPtS the Ridgevie~ Homers, nets
AsscciaCior, in its desiFe to foiio~, thr'oug'n ~z:n its c'r'iglnaL
plans to lease the e&sement land fToni the city and suP-lease
it ~o a tmee f&mmer.
Directors. c'nat this use cf :ne !argo
in ~.ne b~st inceres. t of DOOM he:ricochets associaCior, s. ke
thaZ 'you please consic~em these tnou~ncs canefull~, be=c~e
making a final Qecis~on in :~,'ou~
,,~o~j!d appreciate ~',eaPzng from you c~n this n~acl. e
Sincerely,
Russ '~arren
President, Boai-'d o'f DirecCor's
La Serene Homeo~ners Association
S. Neisc,-~ ~/
TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
AGENDA
ITEM
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD AUGUST 27, 1991
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
8:55 PM at the Temecula Temporary Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive,
Temecula, California. Vice Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding.
PRESENT 4
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz,
Parks,
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Moore
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field, and City
Clerk/Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments offered.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Member Parks, seconded by Member Birdsall to approve the minutes
of August 13, 1991. The motion was unanimously carried with Chairperson Moore
absent.
Aareement Establishing RDA Administrative and Revolving Funds
Executive Director Dixon presented the staff report recommending the establishment
of a revolving fund.
It was moved by Member Birdsall, seconded by Member Mur~oz to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
2.1
Approve an agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and the
City of Temecula to establish an Agency Administration Fund and a
Revolving Fund.
The motion was unanimously carried with Chairperson Moore absent.
Minutes\8/27/91 - 1 - 09/17/91
Temecula Redevelopment A(iency Minutes Auoust 27, 1991
3. Authorization to Purchase Former School Bus Facility Located in Old Town
Executive Director Dixon advised that this matter should not be acted upon by the
Redevelopment Agency, but rather should be considered by the City Council.
It was moved by Member Parks, seconded by Member Birdsall to table this item. The
motion was unanimously carried with Chairperson Moore absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report given.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
No report given.
AGENCY MEMBER REPORTS
No reports given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Member Birdsall, seconded by Member Parks to adjourn at 8:58 to
a meeting to be held September 10, 1991,8:00 PM, TemporaryTemecula Community Center,
27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Peg Moore, Chairperson
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
Minutes\812719 1 -2- 09/17/91
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1991
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 10:38 PM.
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks,
Moore
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Mu~oz
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field and
Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Member Parks, seconded by Member Birdsall to approve the minutes of
August 20, 1991 as mailed.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Moore
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 MEMBERS: Mufloz
It was moved by Member Lindemans, seconded by Member
recommendation of Items 2-7.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 MEMBERS:
NOES: 0 MEMBERS:
ABSENT: 1 MEMBERS:
Birdsall to accept staff
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Moore
None
Mufloz
4~DA]Vl]N~091091 -1- 09/18/91
Temecula Redevelol~ment Agency Minutes
2. Ad0Otion of Conflict of Interest Code
Sel~tember 10. 1991
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Procedure Guidelines by the Aoencv
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
ADOPTING PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT
Owner Particioation Rules and Relocation Guidelines
4.1 Approve and adopt the "Rules Governing Participation and Re-entry
Preferences for Property Owners, Operators of Businesses and Tenants
in the Agency Project Areas" and the "Relocation Assistance Rules and
Guidelines of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula".
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
ADOPTING RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND RE-ENTRY
PREFERENCES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES AND
TENANTS IN THE AGENCY PROJECT AREAS
4.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
ADOPTING RELOCATION ASSISTANCE RULES AND GUIDELINES
4\RDAMIN~091091 -2- 09/18/91
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes
5. Aaencv Personnel Rules and Policies
September 10. 1991
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL RULES AND POLICIES
AdOption Of Aaencv Bylaws
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
ESTABLISHING BY-LAWS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY
Authorization to Purchase Maraarita Canyon Site
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 91-10
7.2
7.3
7.4
TEMECULA
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
AUTHORIZING A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND BEDFORD PROPERTIES
A deposit of $100,000 be used to open escrow;
Funds from the Redevelopment Agency revolving fund be used for the
escrow deposit;
Authorize the Executive Director to enter detailed negotiations and
execute all necessary documents to lease the 2.18 acre portion of the
property zoned M-1 during the escrow period or one year, whichever
occurs first.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'$ REPORT
None given.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
4\RDA~ffN\091091
-3- 09118191
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes September 10. 1991
AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
Member Lindemans asked that development of a senior center be placed on the agenda as
soon as possible.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Member Birdsall, seconded by Member Lindemans to adjourn at 10:44 PM
to a meeting on September 24, 1991 at 7:00 PM at the Temporary Temecula Community
Center. The motion was unanimously carried with Member Mufioz absent.
ATTEST:
Peg Moore, Chairperson
June S. Greek, Agency Secretary
4\RDAMIN\091091 -4- 09/18/91
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Agency Members
Executive Director
September 24, 1991
RDA Item No. 2 - Regulations and Selection - Old Town Temecula
Advisory Committee
Redevelopment Agency Secretary June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Continue consideration to the meeting of October 8, 1991
BACKGROUND: Due to the short amount of time between the deadline for
receiving applications and this meeting, the RDA liaison members have not had an
opportunity to review the applications received. It is therefore recommended that this
matter be continued to the meeting of October 8, 1991.
JSG