HomeMy WebLinkAbout101091 CC/PC Jnt. Agenda
C,C
A fOt .
(4',
r~
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TO BE HELD JOINTLY WITH THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
TEMECULA CITY HALL. MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
OCTOBER 10. 1991 - 7:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 91-
Resalution: No. 91-
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Ronald J. Parks
Flag Salute
Council member Munoz
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz,
Parks
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaetf
PRESENT A TIONSI
PROCLAMATIONS
,r----
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 1 5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
nQ1listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink -Request To Speak- form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a -AequestTo Speak- form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
~
2/-e_.1101011
10101111
~
1 General Plan Process
1.1
General Plan Progress Report
· Jim Ragsdale, The Planning Center
· Traffic Consultant Presentation
· Economic Consultant Presentation
15 min.
1.2
Summary of Existing Conditions Report 30 min.
· Consultant will summarize the Existing Conditions Report. Brief
presentations will be made by Dennis Wambem of Stanley
Hoffman Assoc. on the Economic Conditions Report and Bob
Davis of Wilbur Smith Assoc. on the Circulation Conditions
Report. Discussion by the Planning Commission and City Council
will follow.
1.3
Discussion of Revised Vision Statement/lssues Summary 20 min.
· Consultant will make a brief presentation followed by Planning
Commission and City Council discussion.
1.4
Discussion of General Plan Goals and Policies 45 min.
· Consultant will make a brief presentation followed by Planning
Commission and City Council discussion.
,~
1.5
Review of Next Joint PC/CC Workshop
5 min.
1.6
Public Comments
15 min.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: October 22, 1991, 7:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community
Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California
~
2/__-'101011
2
10108111
~~
, ~E
PLANNING
CENTER
300 CC ~ E S~REET
S:.;:TE 1C10
^jENPCRT BEACH CA 92660
,'14) 8j' .Q444
. ?I\~~."" ~ ~3'~ . -2JCorcr,
~'. & ~""
. ~<>"""C'~7er .:-::-:...Ices. 'vI....,
. Em"r::..nmental Studies
. c;,~, 8r~,rnentai Services
& POliCY olornlng
. Lor'S' JfJC Arcr!ltecture
. I-;es:~,' ,,':; \1-Jrogemer,t
. '_,r~> :.- ,::),~n
C,tflces l:"i
f\~ewcc.rt 'jec~cn CA
.= l'erS":r::..j ,~A
;:;eWJ CA
Sacramento CA
PhoeniX AZ
Tucson AZ
October 4, 1991
Members of the City Council
and Planning Commission
City of Te,,::,' j
43172 BUSlilV, > Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Subject: Draft Products for the Temecula General Plan Program
Dear Members of the City Council
and Planning Commission:
We are transmitting the following materials prepared for the General
Plan Program for your review and comment.
1.
Draft Master Environmental Assessment (l\1EA) -
This document provides the background information for
preparing the General Plan and Environmental Impact Report.
New or updated information will be added to some sections of
the report as it becomes available. We will not be focusing on
the details of this document at the October 10th Workshop.
However, we are 'having brief presentations at the Workshop on
the economic and traffic sections of the report. The Draft MEA
has been 3-hole punched for you to insert in your General Plan
Workbook under the divider entitled "Existing Conditions/MEA".
2.
Revised Vision Statement - The Vision Statement for
Temecula has been revised to include the adopted City Council
Mission Statement. The Vision Statement is intended to provide
overall direction for the General Plan and provide a unifying
concept for the community. This document replaces the Vision
Statement dated July, 1991 which is in your General Plan
Workbook under the divider entitled "Vision". One of the main
objectives of the October 10th Workshop is to reach a consensus
on the Vision Statement for Temecula.
3.
Issues Summary by Subject Area - The Issues Summary is
based on the Neighborhood Meetings and interviews with
Council and Planning Commission Members. A memo
describing the purpose of the Issues Summary is also provided.
We will sort through and refine the issues listing as we develop
policies and implementation measures for the General Plan.
During the October 10th Workshop, you may comment on the
Issues Summary or identify any additional issues that should be
addressed in the General Plan. This package should be inserted
in your General Plan Workbook under the divider entitled "Issue
Papers" .
~;}
-e-v
Members of City CouncillPlanning Commission
City of Temecula
October 4, 1991
Page 2
4. Goal and Policies Workbook - The workbook contains the
preliminary goals and policies drafted to date for the General
Plan elements. In addition to draft policies, we have included
policy "ideas" in italics to stimulate discussion. During the
October 10th Workshop we are very interested in receiving
direction on the content and focus of goals and policies. As
described in the Introduction section, the workbook is designed
for your input and suggestions. You may insert the Goals and
Policies Workbook under the divider entitled II Notes II .
S. Economic Findings and Issues Booklet - This booklet is a copy
of the presentation to be given by Dennis Wambem of Stanley
Hoffman Associates at the October 10th Workshop.
The main focus of the Workshop is to reach agreement on the Vision
Statement and begin reviewing the goals and policies for the General
Plan elements. We look forward to meeting with you on Thursday
evening. '
Sincerely yours,
THE PLANNING CENTER
J:t ~gs::rkh
Project Manager
( 1::"- )
cc: Gary Thornhill
John Meyer
TEM-Ol\lOlOJWLT
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Draft Existing Conditions Report
October 3, 1991
THE
C E N T E R
PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT
Prepared by:
The Planning Center
1300 Dove Street, #100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
October 3, 1991
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pae:e
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
1.1 Purpose Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 1
1.2 Uses of MEA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
1.3 Temecula Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
1.4 Local Setting ........................................... 2
PHYSICAL RESOURCES ............................................ 5
2.1 Biological Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 5
2.1.1 Regional Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
2.1.2 Vegetation ........................................ 5
2.1.3 Wildlife.......................................... 5
2.1.4 Habitats, Species of Concern ........................... 6
2.2 Water Resources ......................................... 7
2.2.1 Regulatory Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.2 Surface Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7
2.2.3 Groundwater and Water Quality ......................... 8
2.3 Natural Resources ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10
2.3.1 Mineral Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10
2.3.2 Agricultural Land ................................... 10
2.4 Earth Resources ......................................... 12
2.4.1 Landform and Topography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
2.4.2 Geology and Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
2.4.3 Geologic Formations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14
2.4.4 Soils ............................................ 16
2.4.5 Geologic Hazards ................................... 19
2.5 Visual/Aesthetic Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23
2.5.1 Viewshed/Significant Views ............................ 23
2.5.2 Riparian Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23
2.5.3 Inland Mountains ................................... 23
2.5.4 Significant Visual Character Areas ....................... 23
2.5.5 Scenic Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23
2.6 CulturallPaleontological Resources ............................ 24
2.6.1 Historic Resources .................................. 24
2.6.2 Archeological Resources .............................. 25
2.6.3 Paleontologic Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ......................................... 31
3.1 Ambient Air Quality ...................................... 31
3.1.1 Air Pollution Constituents ............................. 31
3.1.2 Regional Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 33
October 3, 1991
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pae:e
3.1.3 Regional Climatology ................................ 34
3.1.4 Local Air Quality ................................... 37
3.1.5 Regional Air Quality Planning Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 43
3.2 Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45
3.2.1 Background on Noise ................................ 45
3.2.2 Land Use Compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 50
3.2.3 Existing Noise Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 55
3.2.4 Sensitive Receptors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 65
3.2.5 Relationship of Noise Conditions to State
Federal and Other Regulatory Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 65
3.3 Transportation/Circulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 68
3.3.1 Existing Circulation System ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 68
3.3.2 Other Transportation Modes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 88
3.3.3 Current Transportation Modes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 90
3.4 Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 95
3.4.1 Setting........................................... 95
3.4.2 Existing Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 95
3.4.3 Vacant Land Inventory .............................. 98
3.4.4 Entitlements to Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 98
3.5 Human Health Hazards .................................... 102
3.5.1 Natural Hazards .................................... 102
.5.2 Hazardous Waste. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENTAL ................................................ 110
4.1 Population and Housing Characteristics ......................... 110
4.2 Housing Characteristics .................................... 113
4.2.1 Income .......................................... 113
4.2.2 Overcrowding...................................... 113
4.2.3 Housing Type and Tenure ............................. 113
4.3 Economic and Employment Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
4.3.1 The Temecula Employment Base ........................ 117
4.3.2 Metropolitan and Subregional Employment Trends ............ 124
4.3.3 Existing Retail Conditions ............................. 130
4.4 Fiscal Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
4.4.1 Fiscal Analysis Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
4.4.2 Revenue Estimation Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
4.4.3 Cost Estimation Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
PUBLIC SERVICES AND
UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
October 3, 1991
11
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pae:e
5.1 Public SelVices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
5.1.1 Fire............................................. 146
5.1.2 Police ........................................... 147
5.1.3 Education......................................... 147
5.1.4 Libraries ......................................... 151
5.1.5 Parks and Recreation ................................ 151
5.1.6 Health Facilities .................................... 151
5.2 Utilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
5.2.1 Water............................................ 153
5.2.2 Wastewater........................................ 156
5.2.3 Solid Waste ....................................... 159
5.2.5 Flood Control Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
5.2.6 Telecommunications ................................. 164
5.3 Energy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
5.3.1 Electricity ........................................ 165
5.3.2 Natural Gas ....................................... 165
REFERENCES .................................................... 166
October 4, 1991
III
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
LIST OF FIGURES
Fieure Paee
1 REGIONAL LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
2 CITY OF TEMECULA AND ITS "SPHERE OF INFLUENCE" MAP ........ 4
3 AGRICULTURAL LAND ....................................... 11
4 TOPOGRAPHY MAP .......................................... 13
5 GEOMORPHIC UNITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 15
6 SOIL SURVEY MAP .......................................... 17
7 SEISMIC HAZARDS .......................................... 20
8 LIQUEFACTION/SUBSIDENCE HAZARD AREA ..................... 22
9 ARCHAEOLOGIC SENSITIVE AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 27
10 GENERALIZED PALEONTOLOGIC SITE MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 30
11 PREDOMINANT SURFACE WIND FLOW PATTERNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36
12 SCAQMD AIR QUALITY MONITORING LOCATIONS ................. 38
13 ANNUAL AVERAGE PMlO CONCENTRATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 39
14 NUMBER OF DAYS State OZONE STANDARD EXCEEDED . . . . . . . . . . . .. 42
15 SOUND LEVELS AND HUMAN RESPONSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 46
16 NOISEILAND USE COMPATIBILITY MATRIX. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 52
17 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY CHART FOR COMMUNITY NOISE . . . . . . . .. 56
18 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS ............................. 57
19 FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT NOISE CONTOURS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 61
20 SENSITIVE NOISE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ........................ 66
21 EXISTING HIGHWAY NETWORK ................................ 69
22 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS ............... 72
23 EXIStING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 77
24 AM PEAK HOUR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 78
25 PM PEAK HOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 79
26 INTERSECTION LOCATIONS ................................... 80
27 INTERSECTION ANALYSES .................................... 83
28 INTERSECTION LOCATIONS ................................... 89
29 ROUTE CONFIGURATION & SERVICE TIMETABLE .................. 91
30 CURRENT COUNTY CIRCULATION ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 93
31 EXISTING LAND USE MAP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 97
32 VACANT LANDS MAP ........................................ 99
33 FLOODPLAIN MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
34 ADDITIONAL PANEL NUMBERS ................................ 109
35 COMPARATIVE AGE DISTRIBUTION ............................. 112
36 PUBLIC FACILITIES .......................................... 152
37 EXISTING AQUEDUCTS, TURNOUTS AND BACKBONE WATER, AND
RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLY LINES ............................. 154
October 3, 1991
IV
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
LIST OF FIGURES
Fieure Paee
38 EXISTING TREATMENT PLANTS AND RECLAIMED WATER UTILITY
LINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
39 WATERWATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ........................ 158
October 3, 1991
v
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
LIST OF TABLES
Table Pae:e
1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32
2 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LAKE ELSINOREIPERRIS AIR MONITORING
ST.AT'IONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 40
3 DIRECf SOURCE EMISSIONS IN lHE City OF TEMECULA ............ 41
4 YEARLY AVERAGE EQUIVALENT SOUND IDENTIFIED TO PROTECf THE
PUBLIC HEALlH AND WELFARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49
5 NORMALIZED NOISE LEVEL CORRECTIONS ...................... 53
6 AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS ..................................... 58
7 EXISTING EXTERIOR NOISE EXPOSURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 62
8 ROADWAY INVENTORY SUMMARY ............................. 73
9 HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................... 84
10 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECfION ANALYSIS ....................... 85
11 3-WAY AND 4-WAY STOP CONTROL INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. . . . . . .. 86
12 INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . .. 87
13 EXISTING LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 96
14 EXISTING LAND USE ACREAGE INVENTORy...................... 100
15 VACANT LANDS ACREAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
16 CITY OF TEMECULA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS ..............104
17 SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
18 OVERCROWDED HOUSEHOLDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
19 HOUSING STOCK AND TENURE ................................ 114
20 HOUSING UNITS BY TENURE. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114
21 SUMMARY HOUSING COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
22 AVERAGE SALES PRICE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
23 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
24 TEMECULA AREA PRIVATE SECfOR EMPLOYMENT TRENDS:
1983 -1989 .................................................. 118
25 COMPARATIVE ANNUAL GROWTH RATES PRIVATE SECTOR
EMPLOYMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 119
26 THE COMPOSITION OF MANUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT GROWlH
TEMECULA AREA: 1983-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
27 THE COMPOSITION OF SERVICES EMPLOYMENT GROWlH TEMECULA
AREA: 1983-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
28 PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT TRENDS BY INDUSTRY DIVISION
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA
(MSA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
29 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT
TRENDS: 1983-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
October 3, 1991
VI
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
LIST OF TABLES
Table Paee
30 PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT LEVELS BY INDUSTRY DIVISION
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO MSA AND SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE
COUNTY 1983-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
31 PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT GROWTH BY INDUSTRY DIVISION
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO MSA AND SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE
COUNTY 1983-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
32 ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD PURCHASING POWER CITY OF TEMECULA:
1990 ...................................................... 130
33 CITY OF TEMECULA RETAIL SALES LEAKAGE AND CAPTURE -
EXISTING POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
34 CITY OF TEMECULA PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
35 CALCULATION OF USE TAX FACTOR ............................ 136
36 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICES
AND PARKS ASSESSMENT. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
37 POLICE SERVICES COST FACTORS .............................. 139
38 FIRE SERVICES REVENUES AND COSTS FISCAL YEAR 1990-1991 ......140
39 PROPOSED FIRE STATIONS .................................... 140
40 PUBLIC WORKS OVERHEAD FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
41 PUBLIC WORKS COST FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
42 DERIVATION OF MARGINAL PLANNING COST FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
43 DERIVATION OF CITYWIDE OVERHEAD FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
44 RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COST FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . .145
45 TEMECULA FIRE FACILITIES AND STAFFING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
46 SUMMARY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES ............................. 147
47 INTERIM FACILITIES ......................................... 149
48 RELOCATABLE FACILITIES .................................... 149
49 STUDENT GENERATION RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
50 MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN FEE DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . 161
October 3, 1991
Vll
Existing Conditions Report
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Chapter One
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose Statement
This Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) describes the natural and man-made
environment in the Temecula Study Area. The purpose of the MEA is twofold: to
provide baseline environmental data for use in the General Plan!Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) planning effort; and to serve as a resource for subsequent preparation and
review of environmental documents.
An understanding of existing environmental conditions, as well as opportunities and
constraints posed by these conditions, is critical in preparation of the General Plan.
Preparation of the Land Use Element, for example, is premised on thorough knowledge
of environmental conditions, e.g., hazardous and culturally sensitive areas, that impact the
distribution, density and location of uses in the Study Area. The MEA also serves as the
environmental setting for the General Plan EIR.
The environmental inventory assists future planning efforts by providing a baseline against
which projects can be evaluated. This approach ensures accuracy and consistency among
subsequent environmental documents, and addresses pragmatic concerns regarding
duplication of effort and costs.
1.2 Uses of MEA
Section 15169 of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) establishes several uses
for the MEA Typical uses of MEAs include the following: providing information for
initial studies, negative declarations and EIRs; assisting local agencies in preparing general
plans; and providing reference documents for responsible reviewing environmental
documents produced by lead agencies.
1.3 Temecula Study Area
The Temecula Study Area consists of the City of Temecula and its Sphere of Influence,
as shown in Figure 2. The Study Area consists of 68 square miles. Present City
boundaries encompass approximately 26 square miles, and the remaining 42 square miles
are located in unincorporated Riverside County. The Sphere of Influence refers to the
area that is ultimately to be annexed by the City of Temecula. The Riverside County
Local Agency Formation Commission adopted the City of Temecula Sphere of Influence
in August, 1991.
October 3, 1991
1
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
1.4 Local Setting
The Temecula Study Area is located in the southwestern comer of Riverside County. The
City of Murrieta adjoins the northwestern City limit and the Pechanga Indian Reservation
adjoins the southeastern limit. The remaining sides are bound by unincorporated
Riverside County.
The Sphere of Influence generally approximates current City boundaries on the west and
eastern sides. The Sphere, however, extends from the northeastern City boundary
approximately several miles. State Route 79 serves as the boundary for the northernmost
portion of this area. To the south, the Sphere of Influence encompasses the area between
the City's southern limit and the San Diego County line.
The Study Area is linked to major metropolitan areas and transportation corridors in
Southern California by the Interstate 15 and State Route 79 freeways. The 1-15 traverses
the western portion of the Study Area in a northwest-southerly direction, south of its
juncture with Interstate 215. State Route 79 is located in the northern and southern
portions of the Study Area; SR-79 runs generally northeast to southwest through the
northern portion of the Study Area, merges into the 1-215 as it extends through the city,
diverges in the southwestern portion and then trends in a southeast direction.
The Study Area is located in the Temecula Valley Region, and is surrounded by rolling
foothills and mountains. The Santa Ana Mountains are located directly west of the Study
Area, and the Santa Margarita and Agua Tibia Ranges are to the south. The San Jacinto
ranges lie approximately 30 miles east of the Study Area.
Distances from the Study Area to major surrounding cities are as follows: 85 miles
southeast of Los Angeles; 60 miles north of San Diego; and 40 miles south of Riverside.
Cities within a 30-mile radius include Escondido, Hemet, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Lake
Elsinore, Murrieta, and Moreno Valley.
October 3, 1991
2
Existing Conditions Report
REGIONAL LOCATION
"',
.,
I
lEt~ide
~~,
~~
. Moreno Valley
Hwy. eo
1m.... 10
. San Jacinto
o Lake PwriI
Cl
Hemet.
Murrieta.
.
Rancho California
-~
....
"L_
-0
l-
i
R~. County_
Sen OIego County
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
~ eM:) THE
CI:) ~NG
13lIll DIM STREET. SUTE 1ID
NE'MOfIT IIUOt CA ~ rn..,._
vmrv Aan~S
~_" "f.\.
-o;~._.~i.
_..__1.:2-:. .
t ",..
_-C:~"'4".&'-
. ._.~..,.:.... \
'~~,' ,.~"1"'^~_'Jo;,
,\
~ _71It7 ;'
.1', "!",I,,
/.J .
_~r-'V----~~i'"O't..i,;
~ -'.'- '.
~ ;\ ._ _ T _ '
, "", " '~_.,
r..;
---
"-00:;- ""_~~,.",,',"'-,,,~.,..,'..,."" :=,=-
, "'1;.-
j.- :
-.-; ~..."
------,)1"'.-..
~....'~1:}".-~~.
,
--.., '
Wlu80Jd u~Id I~J~U~D
VlflJ3W3~
J.O Al!J ~q.L
~-;;~w-..':
D.....~
~~
CHAPTER TWO
Physical Resources
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Chapter Two
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
2.1 Biological Resources
2.1.1 Regional Setting
The Study Area encompasses the southwestern portion of the County of Riverside. This
region exhibits a variety of habitat types and numerous species of wildlife and vegetation,
many of which are considered sensitive by various conservation organizations and
governmental agencies.
The Study Area includes waterways and canyons which are known to be conducive to
natural habitats. Specifically, the Temecula Creek and the Santa Margarita River maintain
a diverse selection of vegetation and wildlife.
Major habitat types present in the Study Area are discussed below. However, it should
be noted that this information is in the process of being updated to reflect current
information, therefore, detailed descriptions are to come at a later date.
2.1.2 Vegetation
Vegetation plays an important role in the natural environment and, in addition, provides
mankind with food, shelter and other resources. Therefore, changes to vegetation can be
very significant.
In the Study Area the vegetative character has changed over the years. Much of the
previously classified grasslands or chaparral is now classified as cultivated, pasture or
disturbed. Significant vegetative communities found within the Study Area include:
chaparral, riparian woodlands, oakwood lands, coastal sage scrub and grasslands.!
2.1.3 Wildlife
According to the wildlife inventory prepared for the Southwest Area Community Plan, the
Study Area wildlife is limited to amphibian, reptile, bird and mammal species.
This information is based on the County of Riverside Southwest Area Community Plan EIR. Vegetative
communities unique to the City and Sphere may exclude some of the listed communities or include additional
communities.
October 3, 1991
5
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Many of the larger predators native to the Study Area have been reduced by hunting and
habitat disturbance. Raccoons, ringtailed cats, gray foxes, bobcats, wildcats and coyotes
are among those affected. The mountain lion became quite rare and may be absent from
the Study Area entirely. The absence of large predators within a community affects the
balance of species within the community.
Several wildlife species within the Study Area are recognized as endangered or rare by
the United States Department of the Interior, California Department of Fish and Game or
the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Upon further investigation, these
species will be listed and discussed in the chapter below.
2.1.4 Habitats, Species of Concern
Sensitive. Rare/Endan2ered Species
xx
Unique/Valuable Habitat Areas
xx
October 3, 1991
6
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
2.2 Water Resources
2.2.1 Regulatory Overview
The 1968 California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972 required comprehensive water quality control
plans for all waters in the state. The State is divided into 16 planning basins as
determined by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Study Area is
located in the San Diego basin and is governed by the San Diego Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
2.2.2 Surface Water
Surface water consists of water in lakes and streams, as well as runoff resulting from
precipitation. The primary source of surface water in the Study Area is precipitation.
Although groundwater exits are located in the Study Area, there are no major natural
surface channels that ensure continual surface water flow. The water system is, therefore,
considered a closed system. The magnitude and variability of precipitation is the primary
determinant in surface water features.
The Study Area is located in the Santa Margarita River Basin, which is divided by the
coastal mountains into coastal and inland areas. The Santa Margarita River, located west
of Temecula, is the primary river in the Study Area. The main tributaries of this
southwesterly flowing river are Temecula and Murrieta creeks. These creeks drain the
inland portion of the Santa Margarita River Basin and join with the Santa Margarita River,
inside the city's western boundary, at Temecula Canyon.
The lack of a continually flowing river, snowpack melting in the summer months, and the
relatively intense periods of precipitation followed by extended dry periods results in the
seasonal, or irregular, character of the Study Area streams. The water flow records
referenced below are based on the base period 1936-1937 through 1964-65. This period
generally reflects the hydrological character of the area streams.
Santa Gertrudis Creek
This creek flows westerly through the northern portion of the City boundaries. The creek
flows for 12 miles from its origin before it joins Murrieta Creek near the northwestern
City boundary. The flow of Santa Gertrudis Creek is estimated at 3,500 acre feet per
year.
Murrieta Creek
Located generally along Temecula's western boundary, this creek flows southeasterly for
the length of the Temecula Valley and has an overall drainage area of 220 miles.
October 3, 1991
7
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The creek flows 14 miles from its origin before it joins with the Temecula Creek to form
the Santa Margarita River. According to streamflow records, the annual water volume
varied from a high of 31,500 acre feet in 1937-38, to a low of 280 acre feet in 1963-64.
Temecula Creek
This creek originates at the northwest flank of Palomar Mountain in San Diego County
and on the adjacent high ground of the southeastern edge of the watershed. The creek
flows through the southern portion of the Study Area. A number of small tributaries
merge with this creek as it flow in a northeasterly direction to Vail Lake. The flow
course from the point of origin to Vail Lake is approximately 18 miles. However, surface
flow is intermittent because the creek moves underground as it encounters pervious
surfaces on its course.
Run-off from the area between Red Mountain and Vail Lake northeast of the City
boundaries, as well as the area north of the creek is directed into Temecula Creek. These
lands vary in elevation from 3,000 to 4,000 feet, and receive approximately 14 inches of
rain per year. During intense rainstorms, heavy runoff is experienced in the flood
channels leading to the creek.
Water from Temecula Creek is directed to Vail Dam, along with Wilson Creek. A gauge
records flows from Temecula Creek at the dam site. The peak runoff during the base
period was 36,600 cubic feet per second (CFS) during 1936-37, and the lowest flow, 590
CFS, was recorded during 1962-1963.
Santa MarlZarita River
This river originates at the confluence of Temecula and Murrieta creeks inside the western
boundary of the City. The flow of the river is gauged 50 yards downstream from the
point of confluence and, therefore, records the combined net drainage of Murrieta and
Temecula creeks and their respective tributaries. The total drainage area of this river is
approximately 586 square miles.
The river course winds its first five miles in a southwesterly direction through Temecula
Canyon. This eastern walls of the canyon have been heavily eroded by water flow and,
as a result, are marked by steep slopes. After passing through the canyon, the river enters
San Diego County. The river empties into the Pacific Ocean near Camp Pendleton.
2.2.3 Groundwater and Water Quality
Groundwater refers to water located below the earth's surface, and the water table is the
uppermost portion of the groundwater formation. Groundwater serves two important
functions: it is a source of water supply, and it influences subsurface soil structure, rock
formations and mineral resources.
Groundwater that has risen to the surface is an important source of water. The slope of
underlying rock formations may cause groundwater to move horizontally, eventually
finding an exit to the surface. Seeps and springs are the natural exits of groundwater and
October 3, 1991
8
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
serve to recharge surface waters. In addition, groundwater may pass through pervious
material, or aquifer, which filters out bacteria and debris. The aquifers are an important
feature which maintain the quality of surface water in recharge areas.
The height of the groundwater table is the primary determinant in the ability to extract
groundwater. The cost of extraction increases the deeper the groundwater table is located.
The height also affects the soil structure, and hence the potential for liquefaction and
subsidence.
Murrieta- Temecula Basin
The Study Area lies within the Murrieta-Temecula Basin which is the largest basin in the
entire San Diego Region. The basin covers a surface area of about 60,000 acres. The
basin's southwestern edge is bounded by the Willard Fault, which marks the northeast
boundary of the Elsinore Mountains and the Santa Rosa Plateau. The northern portion
of the basin extends northwesterly along the Murrieta Creek towards Lake Elsinore. The
southern end of the basin extends to the foot of the Agua Tibia Mountains, where it
adjoins Pechanga Creek. The basin underlies Murrieta, Pauba and Wolf Valleys and
receives inflow from Murrieta and Temecula creeks and their tributaries, and Lancaster
Basin, located to the east.
The basin's aquifers are recharged by underflow from the Lancaster Basin, surface flow
in Warm Springs, Murrieta, Santa Gertrudis and Temecula creeks and by direct
precipitation in the valley area. Outflow travels to the northwest toward the Lake Elsinore
area and to the southwest at the Santa Margarita River. The overall storage capacity of
the basin is estimated at 1.2 million acre-feet, and the depth of groundwater varies from
less than 10 feet to more than 200 feet.
Water quality is defined in terms of the physical, chemical, and biological properties of
water pertinent to the use under consideration. The groundwater quality in the San Diego
Basin has seriously deteriorated over the last 30 years primarily for expanding population
and urbanization.
Approximately 250 active wells are located within the Murrieta- Temecula Basin. Water
pumped from the basin is used for both irrigation and domestic uses. Groundwater
quality varies in the basin, with that stored in the higher elevations generally of higher
quality. The presence of aquifers also plays an important role (as described above), in
water quality. The quality of water extracted from the shallow unconfined Alluvium
formation ranges from 300 parts per million (pPM) of total dissolved solids (TDS) to
1,000 PPM TDS. Water from wells located in the deeper confined ranges from 250 PPM
IDS to 700 PPM TDS.
October 3, 1991
9
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
2.3 Natural Resources
2.3.1 Mineral Resources
The County of Riverside contains a number of significant mineral resources including (but
not limited to) gold, gems, tin and feldspar and silica. According to the County of
Riverside General Plan Mineral Resource Map, no mineral resources are located within
the City of Temecula. However, two areas designated with rock products are located in
the Study Area. The first area is located south of Santa Margarita River and west of the
1-15. The second deposit is located west of the 1-15 directly south of the City boundary.
These quarries have produced broken and crushed stone, granite and roofing granules.
These quarries are no longer in operation.
2.3.2 Agricultural Land
Riverside County is the leading agricultural producer in Southern California. Riverside
County is divided into four agricultural districts: Coachella Valley, Palo Verde Valley,
Riverside/Corona and San Jacintorremecula Valley. The City of Temecula is located in
the San Jacintorremecula Valley District.
The Important Farmland Inventory Maps prepared by the U.S. Conservation Service
provides an inventory of important agricultural lands. One of four designations are
assigned to farmlands: Prime Farmlands, Farmlands of Statewide Importance, Unique
Farmlands and Farmlands of Unique Importance.
Prime Farmland is land best suited for agricultural use based on a number of factors
including soil composition and water supply. Farmlands of Statewide Importance are
lands having a good combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing
food, forage, fiber and oilseed products. Unique Farmland is currently used for
production of specific high value food and fiber crops. The land yields high quality or
. quantity of products, when treated and managed with modem farming methods. Finally,
Farmlands of Local Importance refers to land of significant local importance. These lands
could typically be classified as Prime or Statewide Importance, but lack available
irrigation water.
As illustrated by Figure 3, the Study Area has small percentages of all of the above
categories. However, it should be noted that portions of the land designated for
agricultural purposes may have recently been developed. As illustrated by Figure 3, the
greatest percentage of the Study Area falls under the "X" and "0" categories which
designate all lands that are urbanized or do not fit any other categories. There are some
areas designated as unique farmland to the southwest and some land designated as
farmland of local importance along the eastern border of the Study Area.
Several wineries are located in the Temecula Valley region and are important to the City
of Temecula in terms of trade and tourism. The wineries are concentrated along Rancho
California Road east of the City. The water permeable soils and irrigation ditches are
highly suitable for viticulture; the eleven wineries located in this area constitute the most
important wine making region in Southern California.
October 3, 1991
10
Existing Conditions Report
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
~'
',"" ~
, ,'.,' <.,j' " ,
~x '.'
~,)'A - /'. 'v-;1'- ,"
, ",( '()'( "",
... " J...' y..'. '" '''','
",-'--~: ! ~. -. ".
','~/ ',' ',-".~' c"..,y , ~7
..: :-.~'.'. I,'
J-r.',: ,J.) ,I; l.,,~\~, . " .
, 1\' ," '1y;r... I 'I')
-:., r" \,' / .'.
... L-'--' ) J \ .
\/r ~f \ U ,~ :, '.'
V',' -....~, "~,.
' \ i
.. ..i,
i \_ T\ ~'
/ '
(
,.1
''\. 1
,~
'~"'f'./
J'.
'-::.~,
~-
I,
':tj
,...........,
I ~~..........J-.-
') '{j ",'/
': r.
__..L.../ ~--
,.-.,- ,~./..
,--
)
. ,''' I I
"-
,
'- -/
.....\, ~
,.", '"
, '-~ '-" ,
" '\ \ """ I
,'~~ "-..,
; . \
'y~"-.,,,~
f~
)
i
I
.=:==~
..........
o Prime Farmland
o Farmland of Statewide Importance
o Unique Farmland
o Farmland of Local Importance
o Grazing Land
o Urban and Built-up Land
IT! Other Land
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!]Il~~
mlDIM~""'_
.......11IO( fA _"".....
:"- ~ ...,..-~
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
2.4 Earth Resources
2.4.1 Landform and Topography
The Study Area is located in the southwestern portion of Riverside County and covers
approximately 26 square miles of City property and 42 miles of City Sphere of Influence
properties. A variety of landforms are present within the Study Area including a broad
range of topographic elevations and slope gradients. The following paragraphs detail the
Study Area's topographic conditions.
The Study Area is surrounded by prominent plateaus and mountain ranges, including the
Santa Rosa Plateau to the west, the Santa Margarita Mountains to the southwest and the
Agua Tibia Mountains to the southeast. The San Jacinto Mountains and San Bernardino
Mountains can be seen to the east and north, however, they are not located within or
adjacent to the Study Area.
There are three valleys located within the Study Area, the Temecula Valley, the Pauba
Valley and Wolf Valley. The Temecula Valley runs in a north-south direction and
dissects the western portion of the City. The Pauba Valley dissects the center of the City
running in a east-west direction. Finally, the Wolf Valley branches off from the Pauba
Valley in a south-east direction encompassing the southernmost part of the Study Area.
Progressing from a west to east direction, the general topography within the Study Area
consists of steep ridges, dropping to a low north-south valley, progressing to rolling
hillsides dissected by east-west valleys. Elevations range from 1,000 feet in the valley
floors to 1,200 feet along to rolling hillsides to a high of 2,300 in the steep ridge lines in
the southwestern areas. Figure 4 illustrates the Study Areas topographically.
Several small drainageways flow through the Study Area (refer to Section 2.3 of this
document for details on watershed in the area). Murrieta Creek runs along the Temecula
Valley floor intersecting with the Santa Margarita River. At this intersection Temecula
Creek branches off in an easterly direction towards Pauba Valley, and Penchenga Creek
branches off from Temecula Creek in a southern direction along the Wolf Valley floor.
2.4.2 Geology and Soils
The Study Area is located in a natural geomorphic province in southwestern California
known as the Peninsula Range. These ranges extend north from the tip of Baja California
to the San Gabriel Mountains. This province is characterized by alleviated basins,
elevated erosion surfaces and north~west faults.
The development of the province began with a thick accumulation of predominantly
marine sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Ages of these oldest rocks are as yet poorly
documented, but late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic fossils have been reported, and
pharisaic fossils are locally present in the western part of the province. Following this
accumulation, in mid-Cretaceous time, the province underwent a pronounced episode of
mountain building.
October 3, 1991
12
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 4 TOPOGRAPHY MAP
October 3, 1991
13
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The thick accumulation, in mid-Cretaceous time, the province underwent a pronounced
episode of mountain building. The thick accumulation of sedimentary and volcanic rocks
was complexly metamorphosed and invaded by igneous intrusions. These intrusive rocks,
the Southern California batholith, now constitute the dominant terrain of the province.
A period of erosion followed the mountain-building episode, and during Late Cretaceous
and Cenozoic time, sedimentary and subordinate volcanic rocks were deposited upon the
eroded surface of the batholithic and pre-batholithic rocks. These post-batholithic rocks
occur principally along the western and northern margins of the province.
The Peninsula Ranges are divided into several major geomorphic units: the Temecula
Basin, Agunga Basin, Perris Block, Santa Rosa Plateau and the Elsinore Trough. The
Study Area encompasses three of these geomorphic units, Perris Block to the northeast,
Elsinore Trough to the south and Temecula Basin for the remainder of the area. See
Figure 5 for an illustration of the geomorphic units within the Study Area.
The following paragraphs describes in detail each geomorphic unit:
Perris Block - Approximately 20 miles by 50 miles in extent, is bounded by the San
Jacinto Fault Zone to the northeast, the Cucamonga Fault Zone to the northwest, the
Elsinore Fault Zone to the southwest and the Temecula Basin to the southeast. The
southeast boundary is poorly defined. Only the southern portion of the block is located
within the Study Area. The block is an elevated plain with vary low relief, due partly to
erosion and partly to overlying alluvial and sedimentary deposits. It is considered to be
relatively stable.
Elsinore Trough - A northwest trending elongated alluvial basin between Corona on the
north and upper Wolf Valley on the south. It is located in the southwestern part of the
Study Area, and west of the Temecula Basin. The trough is mainly the result and surface
expression of lateral and vertical fault movement within the Elsinore Fault Zone.
Temecula Basin - The Temecula Basin covers the central and greatest portion of the Study
Area and is bounded to the southwest by the Wildomar Fault Zone, to the southeast by
the Oak Mountain Barrier, a discontinuous ridge of basement rocks, and to the north by
the Perris Block. The basin is underlain by as much as 120 feet of recent Alluvium and
is characterized by a low rolling topography which is the result of remnants of alluvial
fans formed during the late Pleistocene Age.
2.4.3 Geologic Formations
The Study Area is underlain by recent alluvial deposits, while the surrounding hills consist
primarily of late Pleistocene Age sedimentary bedrock. The Study Area was found to
have three prominent types of earth materials which are described below:
Pauba Formation (Ops) - The Pauba Formation, known also as Pleistocene nonmarine
(Oc) or older Pleistocene nonmarine (Oco) is well-exposed from Pauba Valley
northwestward to Elsinore. The formation consists of digital alluvial fan and braided
channel deposits, with numerous intra-formation inconformities. The formation has an
exposed thickness of approximately 75 meters and is composed of (1) a light-brown,
moderately well-indurated, extensively crossbedded, channeled and filled sandstone and,
siltstone facris that contains occasional intervening cobble-and-boulder conglomerate beds
and (2) a grayish-brown, well-indurated, poorly sorted conglomerate and mudstone facies.
October 3, 1991
14
Existing Conditions Report
PHYSIOGRAPHIC UNITS
Jj LAKE
~
@J
~:{:~~: ,:~I
... ..~~
. . ..'
T6 R2W
.:.~.::,::~ .::/1- .:'~~~>.
~'~':'.~:.. :.:~ .~,.~./;~
~"',:~.i~\~:' :'~.~~;~, ~i~'(:~':~.:~:~:::: ,;'.)/={.::,;: T:"::.\,F~:\1:t~~ I ~
JMA ~ I i~. "::::~'~"~'R':{~ ~~{6:b~~~:~.~~:j).~~ ~~E:~t.:PJ::;.f':'.~~:;(~ t~,:i~>
)<',0 ~,'-,~~.\~i:~~"~'-!.<~~~'" :-:':/.'. :'.:.:.~ .;,~~'(..,:', .:t:~:::f.. .:..~:~{:~~~::: ~.~..'~R. ':'.~"::':" ::;~~',~ "::":~;:".':' :,:,';' ..:;:..".~'~,,:~~};
..... . ~ .0' "1#., to-. '. . .... -.., ...... .... .,.. y.. . 00, .... . .to . .._. .t..... r-r---;:,...-.
. ~~ :.,.;~;,;.~ " ,; /,,:'~' :~':'! ":"""'~', ",';,j .:::, ".:'!.'. . '.' ...,....... .'. .:. :....,. ..:.,.... ,...'., ,..'.":~,:
~ ~~ "::I';..'~~.]':~ :':::;) ,':' ~ ~~ ":". ;...-:::: ~':~.~ ;:':"'-i :.~:i:; ~ ~\~:. .~:.:~i; :;ti;~ ~~';~':~ ~
'1~. ~:'T~~~ H~' ~,~:~:.:~; ~~',~',..;j.:{~'~'~;":f.;::~:.:~ :~;;~~; ~~~~
. I , '1' '-.' i I-~ ::.: ::':~:;'''~::. :::.:.: ,:'.:,::' 'o!....:~ ~~:.~.
~L\-=?d ". 'U"'/!',.. - \'~ ~ -- ,u"~NCH~.1 .}:~:.;,.:~)(:::%t: ;.::;~:: :2~.:;:. '~\;'~~,: ::~).:
~-r~- I -..... JI &. ..~.::.'.;.;'1:..: :. .'~..<~ ~;:::.'''';:.4.'; :;.....:.:
=- ~ T E M E C U S IIN ~ #' ,:,~'..;,...'.~ '.; :~' '..:~'.; ';..,'.', .'~."., !~',':'
~ ", .".. -.:: r ,... ~ .,::.'.:": :-:.. ~ ' ':":"" .":...
'< \... , ~ ~~ ~o:, ')-:;,:d.X.~'4t :::(.: '/.::.'~; .::F/ :.~)::,.: c
,~ TA ~~1 ~~,.W'.;:' ",:.,:,.",.,., ....:';, ,'."" ","': ,....., IX
"==: 'I J'. '10 I'" 0 '~;;:.~:(..~'~ '::;~"" '..;,,::-:: :\:.~;. r;~:'::.~
:: t" " :~rJ" ..,,~~ n ~ N . ....::.:t'"" ;: ';:':".:i ;~::;:~;. :.~~::~:; ::~:' ",
t~~""t~r -~"~ I ~p.~ 1-..... ._ :4:,~ .~':(.:.~:.::;::..':~: -:~f::' :::~:;:; _
~ # .......I," O~~~' '\..; ....,.. i'~ ,411 ff!J" ,.!~ ~:~..., ~.. ~~}~.: ·
~"" V~.'\.~ ~ I ,.... '.....';~.. .~ ANc~.........l"":,
· =.... ". t ,,~ ~ l :;:.J;;', ;..:,,~.~ c .... ~ lilt., ~
~ TEA U ~. ., ; '" '" ~ RANCHO; ...... "':::'1.- :~.:,::,}ij"" L" .... A ..i.. I
~~ .~ "t:"""", .~..... ". &JJ"~'~';""~'~:~"':"""::; 4"'~1~
~~" ~\\ _9 8S"'''W i:.J.....,. ",' ..' ..,. yr. 'i...~
,...~:"l.t:~" /f.!....~ _~~~'( /~~,~ '~:'O~:~~'R"..T9'" ~~~,'~~' ~
# ~., t ~\1 . ~ - 11 , ..101 ~ j. ....~.:.,..~.. "'" \' rC"'J7..... .J',.e._,
~. nl'" t ,...... ~ . '" "~.~ .. ~ ,,' r I, ~::: ...... ~'~ ~
q ~. t.~...!l.~~' ~~~r~ ,.,;,,'J ;.. .. Go'" ~.. .. ,':, ;...,.....:.
~.~~ ,~~ ."f.. _ ":..,./r~ .f::?~.~:;' ~~.'~.."~ :..)/~~~: i'~.:~: .:-':::':, ~"
'~tJ} ".- ~~!!'i " '~~ ~ ~ . .;: O~ ~ '~::', .., A C ,. ,-'"' .::'~;'-:: :'~:::;'::. ::~':',~
.. ~ t lio '" -, .,' .'-. '. ,. _..~:, ......'L,,:. 'q.."
:: -~ -,. \ '..'~" '.t"'~'-~l'-: .,..~ -::';. '.',.., ':":"".~"'.
- SAN - _. _. ~~~~.~' ,':. .~~: ':.'::< ':":'::~;.~ '..>,;.:,:: ::;:::;~';~',~ JI
COUNTY
)\i::~ i~:{ ,:}\[
t.,~:~: ~ ~ Aguanga Basin
I~~~:EH Elsinore Trough
, I Temecula Basin
~ '~~ /~"" J Santa Rosa Plateau
':~:?;):::f:;;:'.:.J Perris Block Oak Mountain Barrier
SOURCE: Geology of a Portion of the Elsinore Fault
Zone, J.F. Mann, Jr., 1955
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
[!J ~ THE
ClJ~NG
1311II DCMi STllHT. SUTE 111
_1E.ICIt c.o._rn...l,_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Terrace DetJOsits - Quaternary terrace deposits crop out as isolated remnants of a once-
widespread sedimentary cover. These deposits are composed mostly of reddish-brown,
well-consolidated, coarse-grained sandstone and conglomeratic sandstone that contain
stringers of pebble and cobble conglomerate. They are best preserved east of the
Wildomar fault zone and south of Murrieta Hot Springs fault between Buck Mesa and
Pauba Valley. Here the surface upon which the terrace deposits rest lies between
approximately 455 meters on the east and 375 meters on the west and, though regionally
elevated and very slightly tilted to the west, is tectonically unmodified.
Older Alluvium (Qaol) - Older alluvium exists over much of the site and is overlain by
a variable thickness or topsoil (See below). These materials are classified as silty and/or
clayey sands. Generally, the older alluvium is slightly moist to moist, medium dense,
with numerous pinhole voids, decreasing with depth. The alluvium thickness ranges from
approximately 2 feet to greater than 30 feet in the flood plain area along the southern
portion of the Study Area.
Alluvium (Oal) - Alluvium is soil that has been transported and deposited primarily by
flowing water. These soils are found in valleys, canyons and tributary areas. The
Temecula Basin is underlain by as much as 120 feet of alluvium. Alluvial material are
generally silty to clayey sands, varying from damp to wet and loose to firm in
consistency. These soils have a very low to low expansion potential and exhibit moderate
strength characteristics when use as compacted fill.
2.4.4 Soils
The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) divides areas for soil surveys into five general
kinds of landscapes for interpretive purposes.2 They are: Coastal Plains, Coastal
Terraces, Coastal Foothills, Mountain Slopes and Alluvial Fans. The Study Area is
located in one of these categories: Coastal Plains.
Coastal Plains
This physiographic section is made up of soils in intermediate valleys or in intermountain
valleys at a low elevation. Most of the areas consist of deep alluvial fills that extends into
uplands that surround valleys. Elevation ranges from 500 to 3,500 feet, and annual
rainfall from 9 to 18 inches. The average annual temperature is 590 to 650F, and the
frost-free season is about 200 to 300 days. The Coastal Plain is traversed by several large
faul; ones and faults that have contributed greatly to the easily delineated separation of
valley soils and upland soils.
The next level of detail is the soils associations. The Western Riverside County Soil
Survey uses five general soil associations. These associations have been divided into
series, and these series have been further divided into soil types. A soil association is a
landscape that has a distinctive proportional pattern of soils and is tied to the
physiographic province. An association generally consists of one or more major soils;
and, in numerous instances, soils in one association may occur in another. Soil
associations are useful in developing a general idea of the soils in an area and for
2
United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, Western Riverside Area
Soil Survey. 1971.
October 3, 1991
16
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
FIGURE 6 SOIL SURVEY MAP
October 3, 1991
17
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
determining the value of an area for certain uses (such as watershed, wildlife, agriculture,
development or recreation). The Study Area has five associations
Caialco - Temescal - Las Posas Association - This association is located in the north
central portion of the Study Area. These soils are well-drained. Slopes range from 2 to
50 percent. The areas that are hilly to steep generally are rocky but in places are cobbly
or stony. Other areas occur as islands in an intermediate valley. Elevation ranges from
900 to 3,500 feet. Average rainfall is 9 to 18 inches, the average annual temperature is
590 to 650F, and the frost-free season ranges from 230 to 300 days.
Friant - Lodo - Escondido Association - This association is located in two portions of the
Study Area; to the northeast and southwest. These soils are mainly on islands of
metamorphosed sandstone and mica-schist rock in the intermediate valley and on foothills
of the Santa Ana Mountains. They are well-drained and somewhat excessively drained.
Slopes range from 2 to 50 percent. Elevation ranges from 700 to 3,000 feet, and the
average annual rainfall ranges from 10 to 14 inches. The average annual temperature is
590 to 650F, and the frost-free season is 210 to 280 days.
Cieneba - Rock Land - Fallbrook Association - This association is only located in a small
portion of the southern areas of the Study Area. They are mainly on granitic rock islands
in the intermediate valleys and on the foothills of the San Jacinto Mountains. Many
alluvial fans emanate from these islands. Slopes range from 2 to 50 percent. Elevation
ranges from 700 to 3,500 feet, and the average annual rainfall ranges from 9 to 16 inches.
The average annual temperature is 590 to 650F, and the frost-free season is 200 to 300
days.
Hanford - TUl!Una - Greenfield Association - This association covers the greatest amount
of the Study Area. The soils of this association are on short alluvial fans and on flood
plains. They are excessively drained to well-drained. These soils formed in granitic
alluvium washed from the uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 25 percent. Elevation ranges
from 600 to 3,500 feet, and the average annual rainfall ranges from 9 to 18 inches. The
average annual temperature is 590 to 650F, and the frost-free season is 200 to 280 days.
Monserate - Arlinl!ton - Exeter Association - This association is found primarily in the
central western areas. The association occupies old alluvial fans and terraces. The areas
are dissected by drainageways, or barancas, that have flat bottoms and steep sides. The
soils of this association formed in granitic alluvium washed from the San Jacinto
Mountains, from the Woodcrest area, and from islands in the valley floors. Slopes range
from 0 to 25 percent. Elevation ranges from 500 to 2,500 feet. The average annual
rainfall ranges from 9 to 15 inches, the average annual temperature from 610 to 640F, and
the frost-free season from 220 to 300 days.
The five general soils associations have been divided into several individual soil series.
Soils that have profiles make up a soils series. Except for different texture in the surface
layer, all the soils of one series have major horizons that are similar in thickness,
arrangement, and other important characteristics. Each soil series is named for a town or
other geographic feature near the place where a soil of that series was first observed and
mapped.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of surface layer and in slope, stoniness, or some
other characteristic that affects the use of the soil. On the basis of such differences a soil
series is divided into smaller units known as soil types. Soil type is the smallest category
October 3, 1991
18
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
of soil classification, and provides a useful tool for detennining soils management on
individual properties. Soil series is a slightly more comprehensive soil classification than
soil types, and is useful for soil management on a larger scale.
2.4.5 Geologic Hazards
Several geologic hazards are present within the City that provide a constraint to urban
development
Seismicity
There are four major and active northwest trending fault zones in Southern California, one
of which, the Elsinore Fault Zone, is within the Study Area. The other area in the San
Jacinto Fault Zone (30 miles northeast), the San Andreas Fault Zone (50 miles northeast).
the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone (36 miles southwest). The Elsinore Fault Zone
extends for a distance of approximately 200 miles from the City of Corona on the north
to the international boundary with Mexico and beyond on the southeast. Individual faults
in the cone are generally less than 1.25 miles long, however several have continuously
mapped lengths in excess of 15.5 miles. The fault zone is expressed as a trough study
are, which is known as the Elsinore Through.
The Elsinore Fault Zone extends through the Study Area. This zone forms a boundary
which separates the Perris block on its eastern side from the Santa Ana Mountains on its
western side. Two major faults occur within the Elsinore Fault Zone in the area, the
Willard Fault on the west and the Wildomar Fault on the east (see Exhibit 2-3). These
two faults consist of a number of individual faults. The Wildomar Fault is considered
active while the Willard Fault is classified as potentially active. Active faults are those
which show evidence of activity within the last 11,000 years.
The Elsinore Fault zone is an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone (1972, revised 1985).
The State of California's specific development criteria in special study zones include "no
structure for human occupancy, identified under ~2621.6 of the Act, shall be pennitted
to be place across the trace of an active fault." Structures of human occupancy cannot
be built within 50 feet of an active fault unless it is proven by a qualified geologist that
no active branches occur within the 50 feet.
In addition to the Elsinore Fault Zone, the Agua Caliente Fault Zone is located in the
Study Area.
The Agua Caliente Fault Zone extends from Murrieta Hot Springs southeast to a matrix
in the vicinity of Vail Lake. This zone runs southeast to Aguanga and west to Pala Road
(south of 79 and the Santa Margarita River). The Agua Calienta Fault Zone is a County
Fault Hazard Zone, which means that it is thought to be either an active or potentially
active fault but requires further study. Development within a county fault hazard zone
requires a detailed geologic investigation.
Due to the potential hazards related to having two fault zones within the Study Area
detailed analysis was conducted and included in the Human Health Hazards Section 3.5.1.
Please refer to that section for a thorough description of the Study Area's seismic
conditions.
October 3, 1991
19
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 7 SEISMIC HAZARDS
October 3, 1991
20
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Liquefaction
Soil liquefaction is strength during a significant seismic event, occurring primarily in
loose, fine to medium grained granular material in the presence of groundwater.
Liquefaction occurs as soil particles are rearranging into a denser condition, which can
result in localized areas of settlement, sand boils and flow failures. Saturated,
cohesionless soil is temporarily transformed into a fluid mass. The primary factors which
influence the potential for liquefaction include groundwater level, soil type and relative
density, confining pressure, an intensity and duration of ground shaking.
The potential for liquefaction decreases as the groundwater depth increases, and
liquefaction is considered to be unlikely where the ground water depth exceeds 30 feet.
Initiation of liquefaction occurs primarily as a result of an earthquake, the distance to the
closest active faults and the anticipated duration of groundshaking need to be noted.
The Study Area has one significant area which has a high potential for liquefaction.
Similar to subsidence hazards, the liquefaction hazard area traverses within the Murrieta
and Temecula Valleys along the Santa Gertrudis and Temecula Creeks. See Figure 8 for
the exact location of the liquefaction hazard area.
Subsidence
Subsidence or settlement is the shrinking of surface earth material caused by natural or
artificial removal of underlying support. Subsidence occurs in poor, unconsolidated soils,
primarily Alluvium, and poorly compacted fills. Seismically-induced groundshaking, both
local and regional, and heavy rainfall are naturally-induced causes of subsidence.
Extraction of earth materials, including groundwater, gas and oil is the primary man-
induced cause. Ground failure, earth fissures and surface faults have been identified in
Study Area.
The potential for subsidence and ground fissuring exists in Murrieta, Temecula and Wolf
Valleys. This fissure is approximately five miles in length beginning just north of
Winchester Road, west of Murrieta Creek and running south approximately five miles
towards Wolf Valley. It is expected this fissure will continue to lengthen. This area has
been zoned by Riverside County as a subsidence report zone and is illustrated in Figure 8.
Erosion
Erosion is the process by which the land surface is carried away through either wind or
moving water. Soils with a low permeability and/or a high amount of runoff are
particularly susceptible to water erosion and soils consisting of fine soil particles, as well
as drained soils in alluvium surfaces, are susceptible to wind erosion. Erosion removes
the smaller and/or lighter soil particles first, which are typically humus and clay particles,
leaving the coarse, sandy soils; a soil subject to erosion processes becomes progressively
more sandy and stony.
October 3, 1991
21
Existing Conditions Report
SUBSIDENCE/LIQUIFACTION HAZARDS
SOURCE: River.;ide County Comprehensive General Plan,
Figure VI.1, River.;ide County PIlIMing
Department, 1988
II
-)
.
\
.
I
.
I
.
I
..I
.
.....,
.
.......
I
I
I~ I Liquefaction Hazard Areas
(]J[J Ground Shaking Zone
FAULT ZONES
~ Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone
,~W I County Fault Hazard Zones
Area of Potential Subsidence
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!] 00 THE
<x>=NG
lJlIIl DIM STlIftT. ~ Ul
_!IE.liOt CA _ 014."_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
2.5 Visual! Aesthetic Resources
2.5.1 Viewshed/Significant Views
xx
2.5.2 Riparian Corridors
xx
2.5.3 Inland Mountains
xx
2.5.4 Significant Visual Character Areas
xx
2.5.5 Scenic Corridors
xx
October 3, 1991
23
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
2.6 Cultural/Paleontological Resources
2.6.1 Historic Resources
Archaeological evidence indicates that Temecula was inhabited at least 4,000 years ago
by gatherers. The Luisano and Cahuilla Indians, two prominent hunting and gathering
groups in inland coastal Southern California, are believed to have occupied the Study
Area. The first Indian settlement of Temecula was inhabited in 900 A.D., approximately
1 mile south of the current downtown area. According to legend, Temecula was named
by Indian chief Nahachish and means "The valley of diffused sunlight",3
In the late 1700's, missionaries traveled to the Temecula area to begin the establishment
of a mission system. The Temecula Indians were placed under the aegis of the closest
mission, Mission San Luis Rey. From that point on the Temecula Indians were called
Luisenos. The Indians lived a quiet existence until 1847 when the Indians and
Californians clashed during the Mexican War and over 100 Indians were killed. The
"Temecula Massacre" as it is referred to by local historians changed the Indians
relationship with the area and ultimately led to their location on the Penchanga Indian
Reservation.
In the early part of the 1800's the town of Temecula was moved to its second site, the
Pauba Ranch. In 1857 John Butterfield founded a mail and passenger stage coach route
which had a regular stop in Temecula. With the addition of the stage coach, Temecula
experienced its first boom. However, by 1861 the stage/mail line was canceled and
Temecula's first boom was at an end. The railroad came to Temecula in the late 1880's,
but due to severe flooding was terminated by 1926.
During the 1800's five private land grants, called ranchos, were made in southwest
Riverside County. They were: La Laguna (Jun 9, 1844), Pauba (November 9, 1844),
Temecula (December 14, 1844), Little Temecula (May 7, 1845), and Santa Rosa
(January 30, 1846). In 1904 Walter Vail bought most of the land and established a cattle
ranch.
The evolution of the wineries located just outside of the Study Area began as far back as
the 1840's with the production of wine for the missions in the area, However,
commercial vintners now present did not begin to locate in Temecula until the mid-
1960's. Currently there are eleven successful wineries adjacent to the Study Area along
Ranch Road.
3
Carole Henderson Wright, Temecula Remembered, 1990.
October 3, 1991
24
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
2.6.2 Archeological Resources
A records search of archaeological sites within the Study Area was conducted by the
University of Riverside, Department of Anthropology, Eastern Information Center. The
records search indicated that there are 94 cultural resource reports that have been written
about projects within the City boundaries.4 Approximately three-fifths of the land in the
City has been surveyed for cultural resources. However, over half of the surveyed area
in Temecula was surveyed over ten years ago, and archaeological research questions,
standards and methods have changed substantially.
Vegetation cover is repeatedly cited in the reports as obscuring the majority of the ground,
and this situation has not changed with the years. One report documenting a survey of
nearly a third of the City specifically states that:
"...the results of this reconnaissance should not be taken as a complete
inventory of all cultural resources present on the property, for it is quite
possible, and even probable, that some historic and prehistoric materials
remain undiscovered." (White 1980:6, MF #991)
Twenty-three archaeological sites are' recorded within the City boundaries and are
associated with prehistoric, ethnographic and historical occupations of the valley.
Archaeologists use the three broad categories "prehistoric," "ethnographic" and "historical"
to described sites, based on the period in which they were occupied, which implies the
type of evidence available about them. Prehistoric sites are those for which there is no
written documentation, and no evidence of Euro-americans contact (glass beads, metal
artifacts, etc.). Ethnographic sites are those sites occupied by Native Americans during
the early period of settlement of the areas by Euro-americans; frequently, theses sites are
mentioned in historical documents as being Native American settlements. Historical sites
are those which are associated with the advent of written documents, and therefore, these
sites are Euro-american sites.
Prehistoric occupation in the Temecula area currently dates back at least 4,000 years
before present, but there is ample evidence that occupation of Southern California dates
back 14,000 years ago. As few sites in the Temecula area have been excavated and found
to yield datable material, some sites may be much older than 4,000 years. Native
American villages in the area were described by early European and Euro-american
explorers. Native American living in the area today are actively concerned with the
identification and proper treatment of their ancestors' remains.
The types of sites associated with the Native American occupation of the valley range
from single bedrock milling slicks (used to process plants and animals), to scatters of
tools and flaked stone, to large village sites containing tools of many types, and midden
(soil which has been chemically changed by longer human occupation.)
4
The Sphere of Influence area was not determined at the time of this search. therefore it is not included in this
report. However, it is currently being researched and will be included at a later date.
October 3, 1991
25
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The ethnographic period includes Native American sites which were occupied during the
stage of European and Euro.american contact. These sites are village sites, and
occasionally contain structures and trade items in addition to more traditional stone tools.
The historical period of the valley goes back to Rancho Temecula land grant in 1835 and
the advent of written documentation about the area., Under State guidelines, an
archaeological site may be as young as 45 years: thus, WWII-era structures are beginning
to be recorded in the inventory. The cultural resources associated with the Euro-american
occupation include sites of all types, from early ranching adobes and the two-story Vail
Ranch "Big House," to cattle ramps, stage coach stops, and trash-dumps.
Due to the presence of reliable water sources and a fertile valley floor, apparently the
Temecula area has always been a desirable place to live. Prehistoric sites in the City of
Temecula tend to be long-term occupation sites. Most of these village sites have been
destroyed by Euro-american development prior to recent laws passed to protect them.
Because village sites contain more remains of daily living than do smaller short-term
habitation sites, they are valuable to researchers for their evidence about past cultures.
Furthermore, it is not unusual in the Temecula area for single location to contain evidence
of occupation from the prehistoric through the historical period. One historical-era Native
American site is the location of the first Euro.american birth in Riverside County. Also,
the site of the first location of historical Temecula was a prehistoric village.
To add to the cultural sensitivity of the locale, burials are frequently associated with the
village sites of the periods. Isolated prehistoric and historical human remains have been
found in the Temecula area, as well as those associated with known cemeteries.
Archaeologic sites are locations which contain significant levels of resources which
identify human activity. Generally a site is defined by a significant accumulation or
presence of one or more of the following criteria: Food remains, waste from the
manufacturing of tools, tools concentrations or alignments of stones, modification of rock
services, unusual discoloration or accumulation of soil, or human skeletal remains.
Archaeologic sites are abundant in the Study Area. Many studies have been conducted
with or in close proximity to the Study Area. This has resulted in over 23 recorded sites.
To protect these sites from further endangerment, exact locations are not specifically
mapped but instead areas of general sensitivity are designated. Figure 9 illustrates the
portions of the Study Area which have been designated as sensitive.
2.6.3 Paleontologic Resources
Paleontologic resources refer to plant or animal fossils dated from 3.5 million to 7,000
years ago. Typical paleontologic resources include hardened remains from plants,
vertebrates or invertebrates. These resources provide valuable information about a region
in prehistoric times.
October 3, 1991
26
Existing Conditions Report
SVffiIV 3AllISN3S JIDO'03HJ"MV
I n I n I n - 16 ~--. -~ W~~~~:';l*,Ic;,J .n I n I 6Z
.. .
-+-f--
I J~T"\__ J,I I OJ I 61 Ii u I n ~I. zz I IZ I OZ
~
S:l:)JnOS:l~ 19:>~80IO:lgq:>1V I:::':::~<,~:"~
JOJ ^l!AHJSU:lS JO S"e:lJV,-.,.""
8861 'lu:lwUlld:lQ 8u~gld
.\luno;) :lp~Sl:lArn 'UO~S~A~Q 8u~gId lU:lJJn;) ::!;)'IDlOS
weJ~OJd ueId IeJ~u~D
VlflJHWHL
JO Al!:> ~q.L
-".IW_Y.l'~~ UJ
CD 3!Ili U~ WlOIIDtI
DN~ao
3Hl~
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Re2ional Resources
Within the Temecula Valley region, sedimentary rock units contain significant fossil
records that date back 3 million years. Scientists speculate that the region may have been
a major migration route for animals moving between North and South America. This
exchange played a major role in the evolution of mammals on both continents. The fossil
records indicate that the Pauba Formation spans the period the end of the Pleistocene
period, when there was a major extinction of land animals. The area is a significant
resource as clues to evolution and extinction of horses and other mammals may be found
in this area.
The following formations occur in the Temecula Region:
Unnamed Sandstone (middle Pleistocene, dates 1 million years to 450,000 years ago)
Outcropping of this sedimentary unit is evidenced between Murrieta and Pauba Valley.
The sandstone unit is sometimes mapped as either Pleistocene nonmarine (Qc) or older
Pleistocene nonmarine (Qco).
According to the San Bernardino County Museum Regional Paleontologic Locality
Inventory, this unit contains at a number of vertebrate fossil resource localities. Large Ice
Age Mammals such as mammoth, mastodon, horse, camel, antelope and coyote are
located in this unit. Small vertebrate fossils found in this unit include bat, shrew, rabbit,
rodent, lizard, snake, frogs, toads, salamanders and fish. Sediments in this formation
consist of Bishop Tuff (700,000 years before present) and youngest Irvingtonian Land
Mammal Age (450,000 years before present).
Pauba Sandstone (early to late Pleistocene, 300,000 years before present)
The Pauba Formation is well-exposed from Pauba Valley northwestward to Elsinore. This
formation may have been mapped as Pleistocene nonmarine (Qc) or older Pleistocene
nonmarine (Qco). The Regional Paleontologic Local Inventory indicates that this
formation contains more than 30 resource deposits. Mammoth, horse, camel, llama and
antelope are mammalian resources recorded. Important small vertebrate fossils include
insectivores, squirrel, gopher, kangaroo rat, pocket mouse, deer mouse, mole and rabbit,
lizards and snakes. Fossils in the Pauba Formation represent the Rancholabrean Land
Mammal Age and may date 3000,000 before present.
Pleistocene Alluvium (late Pleistocene, 10,000 years before present)
Overlying the Pauba Formation, this unit is as recent as 10,000 years old. Near Lake
Elsinore, fossil horse and mammoth have been recorded at several localities.
City of Temecula
A review of pertinent geologic literature and paleontologil". resource records was
conducted by the San Bernardino County Museum for the City of Temecula. Results of
this survey were utilized in the paleontologic sensitivity map, shown in Figure 10. The
following text is based on this report.
October 3, 1991
28
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Pleistocene non-marine sediments occur throughout a large percentage of the City limits.
These sediments are Unnamed Sandstone or of the Puaba Formation, Pauba Sandstone.
Cretaceous and pre-cretaceous rock formations occur southwest of Murrieta Creek, along
the southern edge of the City limits. Quaternary recent alluvium, in varying degrees of
thickness, occur along river and stream channels in the City.
Unnamed Sandstone and Pauba Sandstone as noted above are categorized as highly
sensitive formations as they have a high potential to contain significant non-renewable
paleontologic resources. River and stream channels are marked as having low sensitivity.
Recent alluvium in these areas does not have potential to contain paleontologic resources,
however, it often covers older Pleistocene sediments of paleontologic significance.
Previous resource assessments conducted within the City limits indicate a wide range of
vertebrate fauna from the Rancholabrean North American Land Mammal Age, including
horse skulls and mammoth bones.
October 3, 1991
29
Existing Conditions Report
PALEONTOLOGIC SENSITIVE AREAS
\J
."'7\'f,/
~
~
~
, ..
t.AJ(J. '4I\VIt ,-..
-~',.'/.
/
, ,
, ,/
,
j
i
.-
I
, J
__ l'-.
----
__c:....
--.
SENSITIVITY
DHigh
DLow
,":..',"1 Undetermined
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!]~~~
"tOll 'rft8' Uf( ~
..""""""....""_m..._
:Oft_. ~
CHAPTER THREE
Physical Environment
CITY OF TEMECUlA
General Plan Program
Chapter Three
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Ambient Air Quality
3.1.1 Air Pollution Constituents
Both the State of California and the Federal Government have established health based
standards for six air pollutants. As shown in Table 1, these pollutants include carbon
monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone, lead and fine particulate matter
(PMIO). In addition, the State has set standards for ethylene, hydrogen sulfide, sulfate,
visibility and vinyl chloride. These standards are designed to protect the health and
welfare of the populous with a reasonable margin of safety.
In addition to primary and secondary air pollution standards, the State of California has
established a set of episode criteria for carbon monoxide, N02, S02 and particulate
matter. These criteria refer to episode levels representing periods of short-term exposure
to air pollutants which actually threaten public health. Health effects are progressively
more severe as pollutant levels increase from Stage One to Stage Three. Various
contaminants and their health effects are discussed below.
Carbon monoxide (CO) is formed by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, almost
entirely from automobiles. It is a colorless, odorless gas that can cause dizziness, fatigue,
and impairments to central nervous system functions. CO passes through the lungs into
the blood stream where it interferes with the transfer of oxygen to body tissues.
NitrolZen oxides (NOx) contributes to other pollution problems, including high
concentration of fine particulate matter, poor visibility, and acid deposition. Nitrogen
dioxide decreases lung function and may reduce resistance to infection. Nitrogen dioxide,
a reddish-brown gas (N02), and nitric oxide (NO,) a colorless, odorless gas, are formed
from fuel combustion under high temperature or pressure. These compounds are referred
to as nitrogen oxides or NOx. NOx is a primary component of the photochemical smog
reaction.
October 3, 1991
31
Existing Conditions Report
SmlVUNV.LS A.LnVul) lIIV .LN:iUIWV
I :.nUV.L
'BAll 'Jq-l 'uxId Z1"O
,<I:I~i;~~~~;~~:'~~, ""..I
18.I;}P;}'"
8!WOJnUJ
UCJ!lt".JllIa;JII()~)
uxId 6(ro
...................
..................
,...................
:~~~W
....................
(<)
,uUUI!J,(
l)Uql;)}t,l 13,..1S!(1
'UlfIIIIlO.1
.IIV
:Y.lo~o!mnl!~qJ
'BAll 'Jq-l
< 'BAll 'Jq-l 'uxId SE
. BAll 'Jq-8 'mdd 6
'uxId Z1"O
AJI:lOIOlOqd '^'O
AJI:lmOloqdOJP:KIS
JY.lH1JUI :lA!SJ:KISlp-ooN
=< 'BAll
< 'BAll 'Jq-l 'uxId oz
. < 'BAll 'Jq-8 'mdd 0'6
Jq-l
:lOOZO
:lppcOOOW ooqJllJ
AJI:lmoloqdOJ1ms
JY.lJ-llJJUI :lA!SJ:KIsw- ooN
< 'BAll 'Jq-l 'uxId SE
BAll 'Jq-8 'mdd 6
:Y.l\l:Y.lS:lo!mnl!m:lqJ :lS1lqd SlID
:lO!lUllSOJ-llJlld
'BAll '0011 'mdd ESO'O
'BAll
'Jq-E 'uxId OS'O
'BAll '0011 'mdd ESO'O
'BAll 'Jq-n:
'BAll 'OUll
'uxId 1>1"0
'uxId oro
:Y.lo~o!mnl!or.lqJ
:lSllqd sliD
:Y.lO:Y.ls:JJon H
1:110!A1lJI1O
< 'BAll
(mftJn DOl =< dSJ. JO 'BAll
=QOO2X) lJ1!Ji\=<'BAll
'Jq-I
'mdd SZ"O
"SAil 'Jq-n:
'Jq-I 'mdd 01"0
'Jq-n: 'uxId SO'O
'uxId S'Z"O
:lp!XO!O O:lBOJ1!N
:lp!XO!O
JDl1nS
'.. '..... ,(mtBn OSl
O1l:lm :l!1:1mlJ1!Jll
. IllnOUll '(mjlln OS
'... '..... '( mjlln OSl
O1l:lm :l!1:1mlJ1!Jll
. IllnOUll '(mjlln OS
BO!ldmes :lmnIO^ qB!H
1:1101 \>>lllB:lJS:ls :lZ!S
< 'BAll
.. J < 'BAll "Jq-n: 'mjlln OS
< O1l:lm :l!JI:lmooB '0011 '(mjlln DE
'Jq-I
WcV J:lI11lW
:llll(D:l!1111d
p:lplr.ldsns
(01
(mjlln S'Z
s:JlllllnS
J:lU1lI1b JllpU:ll1l:J '(mtBn S'l
(mtBn S'l
:lnllI \Om,{qll,{ql:lW
BO!ldmes 'IO^ qB!H
UllPllJIS
:l!l!XOlp,{H mn!1DplQ
=< 'BAll 'Jq-n:
=< 'BAll ,{ep-DE
(wtBn S'l
P1l7J
OO!IWOsqy :l!woIY
Bo!~wes 'IO^ q8!H
J:lU1lIlb Jepo:ll1l:J
,{qdllJB0111OlOJqJ SlID
=< 'BAll 'Jq-n: "uxIc\ ro'o
:lP!J(DS O:l80lp,{H
=< 'BAll 'Jq-n: 'weld 010'0
'sqo 1 '%OL ollql ss:l1 .u!p!wnq :lA!I11I:lJ III s:Jl!w 01 Ullql
sS:l1 01 .u!l!q!S!^ BO!l!llA:lJd :lql :Y.lnJY.lJ 01 10nowll 10:lp!Jjns ul
:lP!JOlqJ I,{o,^
S:llll(D:l!I111d
Bopnp:llI ,{l!l!q!s,^
,lII/lfnos
<
IlDmon^oll
dSJ. ....^. Jno'!-n P'" ',lII/lfn 09 < ds.L ..am o!'lOmoall ",n.ay - .u.p.ooas
,milln
l~l;m :)!qn-::> oDd sare.doJ:t!m =
amn,o^ JO<I .0'II!W Jod SjJed =
09'l < dSJ. allw.D^e Jno'!-n P'" ',willn SL < ds.L IfIaW O!,I.wo.lI,en.ay - .u.W!'d :~lmO!^"Jd aJ'M 'p"p.ell 'q~ 'L861 'I ~Inr '^90'1l3
'(a",^" Jnoq-t'l) 'ds.IcwilIn 001 pue '(unm o!'lOwoall JV11....) 'ds.L ,willn 09 ~llnol^"Jd 'J'M 'PJeP"',",'ll 'E861 '611ml1nV '^90'D3
'(wdd PESO' <) wdd HO' < 01 (mdd 'lESO'< ) ,milln 001 < mOlJ p.lloeqo PJePtlell '~I 'I ~,nr '^9"D3
'wdd >1:' < 01 wdd S'l" =< WOJJ f>>lIoeqo pJepU1!l1 'L861 '6 tpI1!N .^90.1l3
'(mdd S'6+<) mdd 6 < 01 (wdd E"6=<) ,wjlln 01 < mOl} polloeqo PJeptrel, '~I 'EI Joqm.ldos .^90.D3
'(.1111."" Jnoq-J) 'mdd OP pue (.1111."" Jnoq-'lI) 'meld 01 ",no!^"Jd .1OM .p"'ptlel,.'ll "Z1l61 'SI Joqmoo"<l .^90.1l3
jWJOPOJ "'ll Aq f>>^0Jddw . pom oq ,"m lu.warn...m JO poqpm I..",^!nbo ay "lu.ml1D^oll ","p.J .lp 'q poq!J'>"P .. poqlOm """.J.PlI
,milln..
mdd,
'II
"J
'.
"P
'0
"q
'I
......-.s'I"D-.'"
lllI61
JdV 'PJOOII $3;)Jno$:l1l J!V
1l!UJ01!1lQ
:3:JlIOOS
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Sulfur dioxide (S02) is a colorless irritating gas formed primarily from the incomplete
combustion of sulfur containing fuels. Industrial facilities also contribute to gaseous
sulfur dioxide levels in the air basin. Natural gas is low in sulfur and low-sulfur fuels are
now available on the market. Sulfur dioxide irritates the respiratory tract and can injure
lung tissue when combined with fine particulate matter. Sulfates reduce visibility and
therefore, the level of sunlight.
Reactive Or~anic Gases (ROG) are formed from combustion of fuels and the evaporation
of organic solvents. ROG is a prime component of the photochemical smog reaction.
Consequently, ROG accumulates in the atmosphere more quickly during the winter when
sunlight is limited and photochemical reactions are slower.
Ozone (smog) is formed by photochemical reactions between NOx and reactive organic
gases rather than being directly emitted. Ozone is a pungent, colorless gas that is typical
of the Southern California type smog. Elevated ozone concentrations result in reduced
lung function, particularly during vigorous physical activity. This health problem is
particularly acute in sensitive receptors such as the sick, elderly and young children.
Ozone levels peak during the summer and early fall months.
Particulate matter (PMlO) refers to small suspended particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns or less which is not readily filtered by the lungs.
Nitrates and sulfates, as well as dust particulates, are major components of PMlO. These
small particles can be directly emitted into the atmosphere as a by-product of fuel
combustion, through abrasion, such as wear on tires or brake linings, or through fugitive
dust (wind erosion of soil). They can also be formed in the atmosphere through chemical
reactions. Particulates may carry carcinogens and other toxic compounds that adhere to
the particle surfaces and can enter the human body through the lungs.
3.1.2 Regional Air Quality
Although significant air quality improvements have been achieved over the past twenty
years, Southern California still experiences severe air pollution. The Study Area is within
the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), which includes Orange County and the non-desert
portions of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Air quality conditions
in the SoCAB come under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD). Despite over twenty years of stringent air pollutant emission
controls, the SoCAB does not attain the State and federal standards for four of the six
criteria air pollutants.
Criteria pollutants are comprised of primary pollutants emitted directly from a source and
secondary pollutants created in the air mass. Primary pollutants include carbon monoxide
(CO), nitrogen dioxide (NOz), sulfur dioxide (SOz), particulate matter (TSP and PMlO),
reactive organic gases (ROG) and lead. The basin is in compliance with the federal sulfur
dioxide and lead standards, but the ambient carbon monoxide and particulate levels
(PM10) reach twice the standards. The SoCAB is the only area in the country that does
not attain the federal nitrogen dioxide standard. In addition, the State standard which is
more stringent is exceed by an even greater margin.
October 3, 1991
33
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The consistent growth in population and industrial sources in the basin, along with the
topography and climatology of the region are highly conducive to the formation of
secondary pollutants. Secondary pollutants include ozone (03), N02, PMlO and sulfate.
The maximum ozone concentrations currently monitored in the basin exceed three times
the federal standard. Ozone results from the photochemical reaction between nitrogen
dioxide and reactive organic gases. These ozone precursors are emitted by mobile
sources, industrial/manufacturing facilities and residential/commercial sources. Of these
sources, motor vehicles are the most significant generator of ozone precursors in the air
basin.
3.1.3 Regional Climatology
The climate of the South Coast Air Basin is determined by its terrain and geographical
location. The air basin is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills.
The Pacific Ocean fonTIS the southwestern border and high mountains surround the rest
of the basin. The region lies in the semipermanent high pressure zone of the eastern
Pacific. The resulting climate is mild, tempered by cool ocean breezes. This mild
climatological pattern is rarely interrupted, however, there are periods of extremely hot
weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana wind conditions.
The annual average temperature varies little throughout the air basin, ranging from the
low to the middle 60's measured in degrees Fahrenheit. With a more pronounced oceanic
influence, the coastal areas show less variability in annual minimum and maximum
temperatures than the inland areas. The climatological station nearest the Study Area is
located in Elsinore.1 During 1989, this station monitored a monthly average temperature
ranging from 490F to 820F, with an annual average temperature of 650F. All areas in the
air basin have recorded temperatures well above lOOoF in recent years; l100F was
recorded in Elsinore during 1989. January is typically the coldest month in the air basin,
with minimums in the upper 20's (F) in southern Riverside County. According to
Chamber of Commerce information, the mean temperature in the Study Area is 610F in
January, and 8rF in August.
The majority of annual rainfall in the air basin occurs between the months of November
and April. Summer rainfall is minimal and generally limited to scattered thundershowers
in coastal regions and slightly heavier showers in the eastern portion of the basin and
along the coastal side of the mountains. Annual average rainfall at Elsinore varies from
three inches in January to less than one inch between May and October. Moreover,
monthly and yearly rainfall totals are extremely variable. At the Elsinore monitoring
station, the annual average rainfall (determined from the past 92 years) is twelve inches
compared with the actual rainfall of less than four inches during all of 1989.
Source: California Climatological Data Annual Summary, 1989; National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
October 3, 1991
34
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The dominant daily wind pattern is an onshore daytime breeze and an offshore night-time
breeze. The typical wind flow pattern fluctuates only with occasional winter storms or
strong northeasterly Santa Ana winds from the mountains and deserts north of the
SoCAB. Figure 11 illustrates the predominant surface wind flow pattern in Southern
California.2
During spring and early summer, pollution produced during anyone day is typically
blown out of the air basin through the mountain passes or lifted by warm, vertical currents
adjacent to mountain slopes. Air contaminants can be transported sixty miles or more
from the air basin by ocean air during the afternoons. From early fall to winter, the
transport is less pronounced because of slower average wind speed and the appearance of
drainage winds earlier in the day. During stagnant wind conditions, offshore drainage
winds may begin by the late afternoon. Pollutants remaining in the air basin are trapped
and begin to accumulate.
With persistent low inversions and cool coastal air, morning fog and low stratus clouds
are common. However, 73% of possible sunshine is recorded in Downtown Los Angeles.
This is an extremely important climatological factor considering the role of sunshine in
the photochemical smog production process. Cloudy days are less likely in the Study
Area and the eastern portions of the air basin, and about twenty-five percent greater along
the coast.
The vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin is limited by
temperature inversions in the atmosphere close to the earth's surface. Temperature
normally decreases with altitude and a reversal of this atmospheric state, where
temperature increases with altitude, is called an inversion.
The combination of stagnant wind conditions and low inversions produces the greatest
pollutant concentrations. On days of no inversion or high wind speeds, ambient air
pollutant concentrations are lowest. During periods of low inversions and low wind
speeds, air pollutants generated in urbanized coastal areas are transported predominantly
onshore into the Santa Ana Mountains, with the remnants of any air pollution emerging
near Lake Elsinore or Temecula. A clean afternoon southerly sea breeze originating in
northern San Diego County meets northerly breezes in an area known as the Elsinore
Convergence Zone. Mixing of air in this zone serves to disperse the pollution brought
in from the northern metropolitan areas, leaving Temecula, south of this zone, with
cleaner air quality than other parts of southern Riverside County.
In the winter, the greatest pollution problems are carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen
because of extremely low inversions and air stagnation during the night and early morning
hours. In the summer, the longer daylight hours and the brighter sunshine combine to
cause a reaction between hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen to form photochemical
smog.
2
Source: Mr. Jerry Arnold, SCAQMD Meteorologist.
October 3, 1991
35
Existing Conditions Report
PREDOMINANT SURFACE WIND FLOW PAlTERNS
",
;'
'"'
~~
,(,
SAN DIEGO C)
- ~
Temecula
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!] fIJ THE
~~sT~~~NG
'EWI'llM IlUCH 0. 92IIllI17Wlll!j' ,_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
3.1.4 Local Air Quality
The Study Area is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 26, one of the thirty areas
under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The
communities within an SRA are expected to have similar climatology and subsequently,
similar ambient air pollutant concentrations. The SCAQMD maintains ambient air quality
monitoring stations in SRAs throughout the basin as shown in Figure 12. The Lake
Elsinore monitoring station in SRA 25 and the Perris monitoring station in SRA 24 are
the stations nearest to the Study Area that have long-term data. An air quality monitoring
station was recently opened in Temecula, and preliminary data indicates better air quality
at this location than at other south Riverside County stations.3
The Lake Elsinore station monitors just one of the seven criteria pollutants (ozone), while
the Perris station monitors suspended particulates (PMIO), nitrogen dioxide, and sulfate,
in addition to ozone.4 Other air pollutants for which standards exist are considered local
problems and are handled through the District's permitting process for stationary sources.
Air quality trends which have been developed at the Lake Elsinore and Perris air quality
monitoring stations between 1987 and 1990 are discussed below. From the ambient air
quality data (Table 2), it can be seen that ozone and suspended particulates have regularly
exceeded the State and/or federal standards, while nitrogen dioxide and sulfate levels have
not equalled or exceeded the relevant State standards in the last three years. Nitrogen
dioxide and sulfate monitoring were discontinued at the Perris station in 1990, due to the
consistently low record of emissions.
Of all of the pollutants monitored, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less
than 10 microns (PMlO) equalled or exceeded the State standard most often. PMlO
monitored at the Perris station in the last three years show a 24-hour maximum of 250
ug/m3 during 1990. The State 24-hour standard of 50 ug/m3 was exceeded on 61 percent
of the days monitored, while the federal standard (150 ug/m3) was exceeded on less than
one percent of the monitored days. Figure 13 depicts the annual arthritic mean PMI0
concentrations throughout the air basin for the year 1990. It can be seen from Figure 13
that the project site falls outside the 30 ug/m3 contour. This area is below the 50 ug/m3
federal annual standard for particulate (PMI0) concentrations.
Ozone exceeded the State I-hour standard 28 percent of the time during the last three
years and the federal I-hour standard 13 percent of the time. Six first stage ozone
episodes (one-hour average>20 pphm) were called at the Perris station during the last
three years for which data are available. Second stage ozone episodes (one-hour
average>35 pphm) and third stage (one-hour average>50 pphm) episodes were not
declared during that time.
3
Per telephone conversation with Joe Cassmassi, Senior Meteorologist, SCAQMD, August 5, 1991.
4
Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Tables and California Air
Resources Board, Air Quality Data Annual Summaries.
October 3, 1991
37
Existing Conditions Report
SCAQMD AIR QUALITY
MONITORING LOCATIONS
\
.
I
I
GlENDO~R
. .
AZUSA .
LOS ANGELES . UPLAND
~~"'.. POMONA · J
~~ . - "WEST LOS ANGELES . { ONTARIO
LENNOX PlCO RIVERA ~. ,
. . r-=- -- CHINO
. WHITTIER' . "
LYNWOOD " LA HABRA .
~ NORCO
PACIFIC
LONG BEACH. ANA:EIM
..~ AL'.'OS ~
,
,
/
" .~...... * _Temecula
"
.
NEWHALL
-,
. I
CRESTlINE I
SAN BERNARDINO
. .
FONTANA .
~__~D-':.A~__
RIVERSIDE '.
~~ING
.
RESEDA
BURBANK
. PASADENA
.
o C E A N
PALM
SPRINGS
. .
~.L
I
r-'
I
_ --.J
.
PERRIS
.
HEMET
E South Coast Air Basin
El County Boundaries
8 SCAQMD Air Monitoring Station
SOURCE: SCAQMD/SCAG, 1991 AQMD
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
[!] ~ THE
ClJ~NG
OIlIllXM STIlIEET. SI.I1! III
~ 8EJOt et.__ 1714.,,_
ANNUAL AVERAGE PM10 CONCENTRATION
L.
\
I
I
-I
30
PACIFIC
"
CRESTLINE
SAN BEAN~
. ~,,'\.
FONTANA .. '\.
'-__ AEDLAND8
. 60 -,
AIVEASID{ /
50
o C E A N
30
.
HEMET
,
/' 30 I
.--'\.......~_ TemecL.!la
E South Coast Air Basin
EI County Boundaries
~ SCAQMD Air Monitoring Station
PALM
SPRINGS
Lll
.
r-'
.
. ---I
SOURCE: SCAQMD, 1990
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
PT1 flfHE
L.J ===~~
VN VN
- -
VN VN
- -
VN VN
- -
pJepUms (1U:lP;}d oN
0 S'oU
0 6OS'1
0 *6on
JnOH-pl/t:wfiJn S'Z <:
:f1.LYd7!1S
o:llejlns JO :lP!XO!P 0:l8OJI!0 JOj spnpoelS leJ:lp:lj 00 :lJe :lJ:lq.l ':llqe:>!(dde ION VN
'~nO!IOoos!P 80!l01!00W oelep jO sqluow IInj ZI ueql sS'.TJ .
o(p:l~:Y.>X:l :l8I1lu:Y.>J:ld O! p:lpnpu! IOU) 886I O! If: J:lqW:l:Y.lO-I J:JqW:l^ON p:lJOI!UOW seh\ :lUOZO oz
OUO!lI1lS s!lJ:ld :lqlle p:lJOI!OOW :JJ:Jh\ :llejlns PUl! ':JP!lCO!P 0:l80Jl!0 'S:Jleln:>!ued p:lpo:xlsns ~oo!lI1lS :lJOO!SIH :J~1r] Ie p:lJOlIUOW seh\ :JuozO oI
- -
"N : %1> %El O:t(OJl:q;JXJI%
" ..... . -
'" " . ... ' , , ,
VN " osz no WflWlXVW
, , -
VN VN I 1791 I S'r 8861
-
VN VN t L8t Z9 PZ. 6861
-
VN VN € OS'Z 9€ 6r 0661
-
pJepUelS (1U:lP:ld oN JnoH-pl/t:wfiJn 0S'1 < JnOH-l/Wdd Z1" < spJepums (P.J:lP:ld
- -.--
%0 %19 %8Z O::>Joa::>l3x:i1 %
-
".. OSl n' wnwlxvw
---.-- - --
0 PI" 8€ 1791 € S'r 8861
0 PI" 6€ L81 In PZ. 6861
0 *Uo Z€ OS'Z 08 6r 0661
JnoH- l/Wdd S'Z. < JnOH-pl/t:wfiJn oS' < JnOH-l/Wdd 60. < spJepUelS :llelS
:f1aIXOla N:f1DOH.LIN S:f1.LY/!1;)I.LHYJ 'l:f1NOZO
a:f1aN:f1JS!1S
ISNOI.LVl.S ~NmOl.INOW lIIV SnIlI3d1ID10NIS'l3 :DIVl
llI'lVnO lIIV l.N3IHWV
l WUIVl.
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Figure 14 depicts the annual number of days exceeding the federal1-hour ozone standard
during 1987. As shown therein, the annual number of days exceeding the 12 pphm
standard in the Study Area is less than forty. From Figure 14, it can be seen that the
federal standard was exceeded less in the Study Area than in northern and inland areas
of the SoCAB.
Sulfate monitoring shows a maximum of 15.9 ug/m3 during 1989, and nitrogen dioxide
reached a maximum one-hour concentration of 0.14 ppm during 1988 and 1989. Neither
sulfate nor nitrogen dioxide exceeded the State standard between 1988 and 1990.
Local Sources of Air Contaminants
Two general sources of air pollutants contribute to decreased air quality in the Study Area
and the Basin as a whole--mobile sources and stationary sources. Mobile sources include
automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, airplanes, helicopters, trains, and ships. Motor vehicles
are by far the largest generator of air pollutants in Temecula.
Stationary sources of air pollution include commercial and industrial operations use of
pesticides, aerosols, paint, lighter fluid, etc., throughout the City and construction
operations. Within the Study Area, the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) has granted permits-to-operate to fifty-one stationary sources. These
stationary sources include automotive services, dry cleaners, restaurants, waste
management facilities, and industrial and manufacturing plants. Products manufactured
include medical devices, home furnishings, business fonns, semiconductors, and power
generators. Together all pennitted sources generate an annual total of 82.3 tons of
hydrocarbons, 169.6 tons of nitrogen oxides, 0.7 tons of sulfur oxides, 24.3 tons of carbon
monoxide, and 7.7 tons of total suspended particulates, as shown in Table 3. Of the fifty-
one permitted sources, thirteen have negligible emissions inventory levels for criteria
pollutants. This may occur because (1) they are not operating or have relocated and their
permits have not expired, (2) their emission levels are minimal and do not show up in
annual inventories, or (3) their operating schedules are infrequent.5
TABLE 3
DIRECT SOURCE EMISSIONS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
(Year 1991)
I Direct Source Category I HC I NOx 1 SOx I CO 1_ TSP I
COMMERCIAL:
Automotive 9.84 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.14
Dry Qeaners 9.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Commercial 9.14 0.10 0.00 0.03 5.28
INDUSTRIAL: 42.33 0.63 0.14 0.02 1.75
UTIliTIES: 11.16 168.86 0.51 24.21 0.51
I TOTAL I 82.261 169.631 0.651 24.26/ 7.681
5
Phone conversation with Jim Fakoury of the SCAQMD on 9124191.
October 3, 1991
41
Existing Conditions Report
NUMBER OF DAYS STATE OZONE
STANDARDS EXCEEDED
L.
\
I
I
-I
.
'" 75 '5.
.- -\
PACIFIC
PALM
I SPRINGS
. .
o C E A N
50
I
,
/.
--"\........... * J"emecuJa
-l
.
~
.
.--.J
El South Coast Air Basin
El County Boundaries
8 SCAQMD Air Monitoring Station
SOURCE: SCAQMD, 1990
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Q] c..c THE
(X)~NG
till CCM STIlEET 9..11( III
NE'M'OlIT IE.<lcx CA _ me iii' ,_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
In addition to stationary sources, substantial air pollutant emissions within the Study Area
result from mobile sources on area roadways. In particular, motor vehicles on upwind
roadways and the Interstate 15 Freeway (1-15) are considered major sources of air
contaminants. The average daily vehicle trips (ADT) along 1-15 ranges from 51,000 to
58,000 within the City limits. At an average speed of 55 miles-per-hour, these vehicles
currently generate 4.2 grams of carbon monoxide, 0.4 grams of reactive organic gases, 1.7
grams of nitrogen oxides and 0.3 grams of particulate matter for every mile travelled.
3.1.5 Regional Air Quality Planning Efforts
The 1976 Lewis Air Quality Act established the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) and other districts throughout the State. The Federal aean Air Act
Amendments of 1977 required that each State adopt an implementation plan outlining
pollution control measures to attain the federal standards in non-attainment areas of the
state. This requirement led to the local air quality planning processes in areas like the
SoCAB. The first Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SoCAB was prepared
in 1979. This plan is currently the only federally approved AQMP for the region.
The AQMP was revised in 1982 and then again in 1988. The 1988 revision was
approved by the District Board in March of 1989 and renamed the Final 1989 Air Quality
Management Plan. The AQMP was adopted by the California Air Resources Board in
August of 1989 and then sent to the federal Environmental Protection Agency for
approval. Recent legislation (AB 2595) required a revision of the AQMP by 1991. A
draft revision addressing compliance with State standards was released in December, 1990
and adopted by the District Board in July, 1991. The Final 1991 AQMP was then sent
to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for adoption.
The CARB oversees the activities of local air quality management agencies and is
responsible for incorporating air quality management plans for local air basins into a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for approval by EPA CARB maintains air quality monitoring
stations throughout the State in conjunction with local Air Quality Management Districts.
Data collected at these stations are used by the CARB to classify air basins as
"attainment" or "non-attainment" with respect to each pollutant and to monitor progress
in attaining air quality standards.
The purpose of the Final 1991 AQMP is to provide a comprehensive strategy to attain
compliance with the State and federal ambient air quality standards at the earliest date
possible. The AQMP consists of three tiers of air pollution control measures to be
implemented by the SCAQMD, CARB, EPA and local government. The 1991 AQMP
identifies needed control methods to reduce anticipated emissions and contingency
measures that will be considered in the event that the control method strategy fails to meet
the expected emission reductions.
Each control measure contained in the AQMP must be fonnally adopted through the
SCAQMD Rules and Regulations process or contained in jurisdictional ordinances. The
City of Temecula is called upon to provide goals and policies in the City General Plan
that assist the SCAQMD in attaining the State and federal ambient air quality standards.
October 3, 1991
43
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Measures contained in the AQMP for local governments are intended for adoption into
local programs and ordinances. Control measures which have not yet been adopted
should be considered as plan recommendations wherever feasible.
The State Health and Safety Code Section 40463 requires that the AQMP be reviewed
every two years and updated as necessary. The AQMP, the responsibility of the
SCAQMD and SCAG, is the primary document to ensure that State and federal ambient
air quality standards are achieved and maintained. Additionally, the California Clean Air
Act of 1988 requires an annual five percent reduction of emissions.
County of Riverside
The Riverside County Air Quality Element of the Comprehensive General Plan (1989)
identifies issues, goals, and programs for improving County air quality. A recent revision
to the 1989 Element contains essentially the same information and is expected to be
adopted by the end of 1991. The Air Quality Element is organized into six sections: Air
Quality; JoblHousing Balance; Transportation Demand Management; Transportation
System Management; Transportation Facility Development; and Particulate Matter.
The Air Quality Section contains general policies for improving air quality. Policies in
the JoblHousing Balance Section encourage jobs close to home which lessens the need
to drive and so reduces congestion, as well as air pollution. The Transportation Demand
Management Section policies reduce the number of cars and trucks using roadways at any
one time, thereby relieving congestion and reducing air pollution.
Policies in the Transportation System Management Section enhance the performance of
existing facilities and fleets, again relieving congestion and improving air quality. The
policies in the Transportation Facility Development Section address the building of new
highways, rail systems, bus and carpool lanes, bike lanes, and other transportation
facilities which increase mobility. The Particulate Matter Section includes policies
designed to cut down particulate entering the air from sources such as construction,
agriculture, vehicles, unpaved roads and parking lots, and wind erosion.
The General Plan recommends that sensitive land uses not be located adjacent to sources
of heavy air pollution, such as major roadways or heavy industrial land uses. Land uses
sensitive to air pollution include hospitals and health clinics, convalescent homes, day care
centers, nursery schools, elementary and grade schools, playgrounds, parks and recreation
uses, agricultural crops and plant nurseries. Features such as abundant landscaping,
setbacks from roadways and parking areas, and site arrangements which allow through
movement of prevailing winds should be incorporated into the design of these uses to
lessen the impact of air pollution.
October 3, 1991
44
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
3.2 Noise
3.2.1 Background on Noise
Noise is usually defined as "unwanted sound". It consists of any sound that may produce
physiological or psychological damage and/or interfere with man's communication, work,
rest, recreation, and sleep. People recognize that noise has become an environmental
pollutant that threatens our quality of life. In this way, it is a form of energy waste from
man's activities.
To the human ear, sound has two significant characteristics: pitch and loudness. The
negative aspect of pitch is generally related to annoyance, while loudness can affect our
ability to hear. Pitch is the number of complete vibrations (cycles per second) of a wave
that result in the tone's range from high notes to low notes. Loudness is the strength of
a sound that describes a noisy or quiet environment, measured by the amplitude of the
sound wave. Loudness is determined by the intensity of the sound waves combined with
the reception characteristics of the ear. Sound intensity refers to how hard the sound
wave strikes an object, which in turn, produces the sound's effect. This is a characteristic
of sound which can be precisely measured with monitoring instruments.
The Measurement of Sound
Sound intensity or acoustic energy is measured in decibels (dBA) that are weighted to
correct for the relative frequency response of the human ear. For example, an A-weighted
noise level includes a de-emphasis on high frequencies of sound that are heard by a dogs
ear, but not by a human ear's. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound
level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Unlike linear units (inches or
pounds), decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale, representing points on a sharply
rising curve.
Since noise is measured on a logarithmic scale, ten decibels is ten times more intense than
one decibel, twenty decibels is one hundred times more intense and thirty decibels is a
thousand times more intense. Thirty decibels represents one thousand times as much
acoustic energy as one decibel. A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times
greater than zero decibel. The decibel system of measuring sound gives a rough
connection between the physical intensity of sound and its perceived loudness to the
human ear. Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very
loud). Various sound levels corresponding to typical sources are provided in Figure 15.
Sound levels are generated from a source and their decibel level dissipates exponentially
as the distance from that source increases. For a single point source, sound level decays
approximately six decibels for each doubling of distance from the source. If noise is
produced by a line source, such as highway traffic or railroad operations, the sound will
October 3, 1991
45
Existing Conditions Report
SOUND LEVELS AND HUMAN RESPONSE
NOISE SOURCE
RESPONSE
dB(A)
NOISE
LEVEL
150
Carrier Jet Operation
HARMFULLY LOUD 140
130
PAIN THRESHOLD
Jet Takeoff (200 ft.) 120
Discotheque
LJnmuffled Motorcycle
Auto Horn (3 ft.) MAXIMUM VOCAL EFFORT
Rock 'n RoD Band
Riveting Machine 110
Loud Power Mower PHYSICAL DISCOMFORT
Jet Takeoff (2000 ft.)
Garbage Truck VERY ANNOYING 100
HEARING DAMAGE
Heavy Truck (50 ft.) (STEADY 8.HOUR EXPOSURE)
Pneumatic Drill (50 ft.) 90
Alarm Clock
Freight Train (50 ft.) ANNOYING
Vacuum Cleaner (10 ft.) 80
Freeway Traffic (50 ft.) TELEPHONE USE DIFFICULT 70
Dishwashers NTRUSIVE
Air Conditioning Unit (20 ft.) 60
Ught Auto Traffic (100 ft.) QUIET 50
Uving Room 40
Bedroom
Library VERY QUIET 30
Soft Whisper (15 ft.)
Broadcasting Studio
20
JUST AUDIBLE 10
THRESHOLD OF HEARING 0
SOURCE: William Bronson, "Ear Pollution,"
California Health (October, 1971), P. ~
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
CI:) THE
<XJ=NG
13llO IXM STltiT. !UTI: III
~-..otCA_I7WI."_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
decrease three decibels for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment. Line
source noise in a soft environment, which is relatively flat with vegetation, will decrease
four and a half decibels for each doubling of distance.
Many noise rating schemes have been developed for various time periods, but an
appropriate rating of ambient noise affecting human communities also needs to account
for the annoying effects of sound. The predominant rating scales for human communities
are the Noise Equivalent Level (Leq), the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
and the Day-Night Average Sound Level (Ldn), all of which are based on A-weighted
decibels (dBA). The Leq is the total sound energy of time-varying noise over a sample
period. The CNEL is the time-varying noise over a twenty four hour period with a
weighting factor applied to noises occurring during evening hours from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00
p.m. (relaxation hours) and at night from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (sleeping hours) of 5
and 10, respectively.
The Ldn measure is an average of the A-weighted sound levels experienced during a 24-
hour period. Unlike the CNEL (which divides the 24-hour period into three periods), the
Ldn divides the 24-hour period into only two periods. The Ldn identifies day (7:00 am
to 10:00 pm) and night (10:00 pm to 7:00 am) periods, eliminating the evening hours as
more sensitive than the daytime. Since nighttime noise levels are considered more
annoying, these measurements are increased by 10 dB before averaging along with the
daytime levels. Although not as sensitive a measure as the CNEL, for most transportation
noise sources the two measures (CNEL and Ldn) are essentially equal and may be used
interchangeabl y.
The County of Riverside has utilized the CNEL metric as its measure for noise control.
Additionally, the CNEL measure is utilized by the State Department of Aeronautics and
the California Commission of Housing and Community Development. The use of CNEL
measures is also consistent with procedures recommended by the State of California
Office of Noise Control (ONC).
The Psvcholos!ical and Phvsiolo2ical Effects of Noise
Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to more than 85
decibels. Exposure to high noise levels effects our entire system, with prolonged noise
exposure in excess of 75 decibels increasing body tension, affecting blood pressure,
functions of the heart, and the nervous system. Extended periods of noise exposure above
90 dBA will result in permanent cell damage. A sound level of 190 dBA will rupture the
ear drum and permanently damage the inner ear.
The ambient noise problem is widespread and generally more concentrated within urban
areas than in outlying residential neighborhoods. Environmental sound levels in high
density urban areas are doubling every 10 years. Suburban areas are not experiencing
such a significant increase in noise levels because of their relative distance from major
noise sources.
October 3, 1991
47
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
According to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations,
protection against the effects of noise exposure shall be provided when the sound level
exceeds those shown in Table 4. This table shows the maximum exposure in Ldn for
various land use categories and locations (whether indoor or outdoor). This maximum is
provided according to the health and psychological effects described above, with a
reasonable margin of safety. Table 4 also identifies whether the threshold applies to
activity interference, hearing loss consideration, or both effects.
A maximum of 45 dB protects against indoor activity interference and hearing loss for
residential, hospital, and educational land uses. Outdoor activity interference threshold
levels are higher for these land uses, at 55 dB where speech communication between
workers over an extended period of time would be difficult. Commercial, transportation,
industrial and recreation activities are considered highly variable, so thresholds for these
land uses have not been determined. Similarly, agricultural-related outdoor activities have
no stated interference noise level. Hearing loss consideration for all activities becomes
an issue at 70 dB or greater, for both indoor and outdoor noise environments.
Sound Propa2ation
Noise sources may either be a "line source" (e.g. a heavily traveled highway) or a "point
source" (e.g. a stationary engine or compressor). Highway traffic noise on high volume
roadways simulates a "line source" and the drop-off rate of sound with distance
approaches "cylindrical spreading," where a nominal 3.0 dBA drop with each doubling
of distance occurs between the noise source and the nOIse receiver.
Environmental factors such as the wind direction and speed, temperature gradients, the
characteristics of the ground (hard or soft) and the air (relative humidity), the presence
of grass, shrubbery, and trees, often combine to increase the actual attenuation achieved
outside laboratory conditions to 4.5 decibels per doubling of distance. Thus, a noise level
of 69.5 decibels at 50 feet from a highway centerline would attenuate to 65.0 decibels at
100 feet, 60.5 decibels at 200 feet, and so forth.
This is particularly true where the view of the roadway is interrupted by isolated
buildings, clumps of bushes or scattered trees, or the intervening ground is soft or covered
with vegetation and the source or receiver is located more than 3 meters above the
ground. It should be noted, however, that the nominal value of 3.0 dBA with doubling
applies to sound propagation from a "line source": (1) over the top of a barrier greater
than 3 meters in height, or (2) when there is a clear unobstructed view of the highway,
the ground is hard, there are no intervening structures, and the height of the line-of-sight
averages more than 3 meters above the ground.6
In an area which is relatively flat and free of barriers, the sound resulting from a single
"point source" of noise spreads in a spherical manner away from the source and drops by
6 decibels for each doubling of distance or 20 decibels for each factor of ten in distance.
6 Source: California Department of Transportation, "Noise Manual", 1980.
October 3, 1991
48
Existing Conditions Report
IDIViI'l3:M ONY H.1'lV3H 3I'lHOd ffiI.1 .133:.10lld 0.1 03:IiII.1N3:0I
ONOOS .1N3:'1VAIOl)3: 3:~VlI3:AV A'THV3A
t 3:'lHV.1
(q) SP3.D3
qJog
JSUJu3V
P3Jo.Id o.L
.I00PJOO
OO!JB.I;}P!SOO:)
SS(Y} 30P8;)H
;);)O;}.l;}J.I;}JOJ
AJlA!PV
(q) SP;}.D3
qJog
Jsu!u3V
P;}Jo.Id o.L
.I00PUI
OO!JB.I;}P!SOO:)
SSCYJ 30P8;)H
;};)O;}.l;}J.I;}JOJ
AJ,A,PV
;}.IOW;)N
SS
SS
SP
SP
OJYI
8:):lU;)P!8:)'M UURd PUg
:r,)gds ;)P!SlOO qHh\ IgHU;)P!8:)'M
OL
(:l)oL
OL
(R)
SS
(:l)oL
OL
SS
(R)
SP
(:l)oL
(t!)
(:l )oL
SP
OL
Sl>
(pZ)b:y}
(PZ) b:Y}
UJYI
(pZ)b:y}
;)P!SlOO oN qHh\
:):lRdS
IRHU;)P!8:)lI
OL
OL
OL
OL
Sl>
(t!)
(g)
(R)
(p)(pZ)b:Y}
(PZ) b:Y}
SlRHdsOH
It!!llSOpuI
UO!llnJodsulU.L :)P!SUI
IRPl;)WW<>:J
SS
OL
(:l)oL
OL
OL
(R)
(R)
SS
(:l)oL
SP
OL
(t!)
SP
(pZ)b:y}
UJYI
(pZ)b:y}
(p)(pZ)b:Y}
uJYI
IRUO!l-e:>Opg:
OL
OL
PUl?l P;)lRIOdodun
It!l:)U;)D pUR PUl?l WJt!d
St!:).ry IRUOHt!aJ:y')'M
(:l)oL
OL
s;>:>lre)smn:>J!:> :lSOlfI U! Jd;r.>lQ 11n:>!J)!P :KJ .(llm ;r.>U;>J~p~IO! 'u!^!1:>1l JO) l;>h~1 mnm!X1lw 1)0 OO!l1l:>!J!IU:lp!
'SPh;l1
ll1lIJI J~II1~J8 00 "~'! ':I8I1J;lhl1
:KJ .{em 8P SL )0 (8)1>;>'] OV 1>
'ssol 8o!le;J1J 00 .(100 p;ls118 .:>
'Ph;ll I$;lMOI 00 P;lSes 'q
',U!h!Pll 11l:>!I!l:l I S! UO!I1l:>!UnWmoo q;);l;xls ;lJ;lqM
10;lJ;I))!P IJI!M> p;l11l!:lOSS1l :KJ 01 m:ddll $;l!l!h!1:>1l )0 s:x!.(1 10;lJ;lIJ!P ;r.>O!S '11
:;)poJ
(pZ)b:y}
Jnoq-yz
~IJI 01 oOllnq!lIUOO ~lq!1l!rS;lo I U! Iln!;.)J 01 IJBnou~ MOl S! .(11p J:xI smoIJ 91 BU!1'rem;lJ ;llfI
J~hO
~JnsodX;I ;l1J1
'HP 09 )0 b7J 011
SI1 BUOI os SOO!11!IlI!S ;I$;llfl U! p;I!.J!lO;lP!
'SJe;J.( 01> )0 PO!l:KI
I S! I~h;ll P;I!J!IU;lp! ;l1J1 III
ssol BU!Je;JIJ U! Slln!;.)J q:>!IJM polJ:xI
;lJnsodx;I ;lq.L :ssol BU~IJ JO) Ph;ll P;I!J!IU;lP! )0 UO!I1rnllJdX3
UO!II1JIS!O!UIpV
I/11e;JH pUll .(I;I)1!S
II1UO!IOOn:>:>o e!woJ!lIQ :;r.>JROS
:;lION
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
This applies to fixed noise sources and mobile noise sources which are temporarily
stationary such as an idling truck or other heavy duty equipment operating within a
confined area (such as industrial processes). Sound attenuation from a train resembles a
line source near the railroad tracks and a point source at distances beyond three-tenths of
the train length.
Motor Vehicle Noise
Noise levels adjacent to roadways vary with the volume of traffic, the mean vehicular
speed, and the truck mix. The noise levels adjacent to line sources of noise such as
roadways increase by 3.0 dBA with each doubling in the traffic volume (provided that the
speed and truck mix do not change). From the mathematical expression relating increases
in the number of noise sources (motor vehicles) to the increase in the adjacent noise level,
it can be shown that a 26 percent increase in the traffic volumes on a given route
increases the adjacent noise by 3.0 dBA. Changing the vehicle speed or truck mix has
an even stronger impact on noise levels.
The truck mix on a given roadway also has a significant effect on the adjacent noise
levels. As the number of trucks increases and becomes a larger percentage of the total
vehicle volume, the adjacent noise levels increase. This effect is more pronounced if the
number of heavy duty (3+ axle) trucks is large when compared to the number of medium
duty (2 axle) trucks.
Noise from motor vehicles is generated by engine vibrations, the interaction between the
tires and the road, and the exhaust system. As vehicle speed increases, so does the noise
from these areas of the vehicle. The noise level adjacent to a roadway is highly
dependent on the average vehicle speed, especially at lower speed levels. The highest
speeds are typically measured midlink, where traffic lights, stop signs and cross traffic
provide less interference. Although some vehicles will go faster than the posted speed
limit, in most areas, the average speed is just below this limit. The exception is found
along lone stretches of highway or streets outside City limits. Reducing the average
motor vehicle speed decreases the noise exposure of receptors inside the car and those
adjacent to the roadway. Similarly, an increase in vehicle speed results in higher noise
levels.
3.2.2 Land Use Compatibility
Land use compatibility with noise is an important consideration in the planning and design
process. Some land uses are more susceptible to noise intrusion than others, depending
on the nature of activities expected with that use. For instance, at educational facilities
it is important to concentrate and to communicate. An interior noise level in excess of
50 dBA may interfere with these activities. Similarly, interference with sleep may occur
at 45 dBA, so residential land use standards must reflect this noise level.
Some land uses are more tolerant of noise than others. These uses typically include
activities that generate loud noise levels or those that do not require verbal interaction,
concentration, or sleep. Commercial and retail facilities require very little speech
October 3, 1991
50
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
communications and therefore are generally allowed in nOISIer environments. Some
industrial areas generate loud noises that would interfere more with communications than
all but the highest exterior noise levels.
The following discussions address the noise standards and those land uses deemed
sensitive by State and regional jurisdictions. While most standards are considered
guidelines, it is important to maintain reasonable ambient noise levels to protect the health
and welfare of the community.
State of California
Land uses deemed noise sensitive by the State of California include schools, hospitals, rest
homes, long-term care and mental care facilities. Many jurisdictions also consider
residential uses particularly noise sensitive because families and individuals expect to use
time in the home for rest and relaxation, and noise can interfere with those activities.
Some variability in standards for noise sensitivity may apply to different densities of
residential development, and single family uses are frequently considered the most
sensitive. Jurisdictions may identify other uses as noise sensitive such as churches,
libraries, day care centers, hospitals, and parks.
Land uses that are relatively insensitive to noise include office, commercial, and retail
developments. There is also a range of insensitive noise receptors which include uses
which generate significant noise levels or uses where the level of human occupancy is
typically low. Examples of insensitive uses include: industrial and manufacturing uses,
utilities easements, agriculture, vacant land, parking lots, salvage yards, and transit
terminals.
Figure 16 provides a noise/land use compatibility matrix developed by the State Office
of Noise Control (ONq. The noise standards identified are intended to provide
guidelines for the development of municipal noise elements. Depending on the
environment of a particular community, these basic guidelines may be tailored to reflect
the existing noise and land use characteristics of that community. Table 5 provides the
noise level corrections to customize the State guidelines for use in local jurisdictions.
This allows maximum flexibility for cities and counties to develop community specific
policies, while maintaining generally accepted standards.
Figure 16 identifies "normally acceptable", "conditionally acceptable", "normally
unacceptable", and "clearly unacceptable" noise levels for various land use types. As
shown therein, the following community (or exterior) noise exposures are designated
"normally acceptable" for residential uses: low density residential up to 60 CNEL and
multi-family residential and transient lodging (motels and hotels) up to 65 CNEL. For
non-residential uses, the following exterior noise exposures are "normally acceptable";
office buildings, business, commercial and commercial uses; schools, libraries, churches,
hospitals, and nursing homes; playgrounds and neighborhood parks up to 70 CNEL.
October 3, 1991
51
Existing Conditions Report
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY CHART
FOR COMMUNITY NOISE
LAND USES 50
Resldentlel Lend Uses: Single aM MU~lo16
Family Dwellings, Group Quaners, MoolJenomes
Transient Lodging: HOlels, Motels
SchOOl Classrooms, Ubrenes, ChurChes,
Hosprtals. Nursing Homes, etc,
--------------------...--------------
Recreallonal Land Uses: Go" Courses, Open Space
Arees WIIM walking, blcychng or horsebaCk rKllng
ltads, With waler pased reereallon areas where
mOlorJzed boats and Jet-skiS are orOnlblled
Office Buildings, Personel, BUSiness, end
Professional Services
- -. -- - --... -- -- --... - -...-..-- .-- -- .....-...... ----
Audrtotiums. Cancen Halls. Amphrtheaters,
MUSIC Shells (maybe nOise senSR/ve or noise
prOClucer)
Spons Arenes. Qutdoor Spectalor Spons
---------------------------------------
Recreational Land Uses: Playgrounds, NelghOOll'lOOd
Ball Parks, Motorcycle Parks, and Waler-based
Recreation Areas wnere motorized boalS ano
Jet-skiS are permmed,
Commercial Land Uses: Retllll trade. Move Tneaters
Restaurants, Bars, Entenatnment relaled commercial
ac:tJvitles, Services,
Commercial Land Uses: Wholesale, IndustrlallManutacting,
Transponation, Communications and Ulilrtles,
EXPLANATION OF l.4NO USE CONSEOUENCES:
- I I I I
..................
'...!~~-:~~..:.w ""'-:;{ .~",~~.,. "'~~l
----- - ...... -- - ... -..", --... -.. - -----{ -... ---... -----
'/ .>>}
........
,~. :.;{:o.':,:'
----- ............ ... --... ......", - ... --- ----- I------l-----
,~ \..................
l"j~;-.., (rr.. , .....
- -- - - - - -- ----- -----~- - - -- - - - - ~ - - - --
~.................1
f'~~;X1(~~~~~.~.""y.~.':-'::~~~4!:
- - - - - +----- - ---- - -....- -..... - - ----.. -----
.*......
~rJ(~t.J.i..:.~:~'"~,I.>:....:.....,...
----+-----~----- .. ----.. ----- ------ .. .. -.....
--
ftHt....ll! i.. ..... .~ "ti"C :,o'".)iii ,- "
------ -----~------ ----- -~------~---- -+ - -- --
~;f::{!c:_!.':'... - '. , , ...~~:~91i,..;~
- ---- -~--- -- ...---- ..---- ------ - ----- -----
..................
Ict~~,....:"....";.t ~...~...__".J!.l .... " ~-r
- ---- ----- ----- - - - -- - --- - ---- - - -- -
,..................
~~;~"l!H.'It .~~~,.
- - -nl----- ----- --.. -- ----- - ---- ----
\...... .......... "i
c::....:.~lr " ~~. . "', ~
- ----l-- UT -----r- ---r-----r-- --r----
55
50
55
~""""""\l
A NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE: W~h no .peci~
no-. reduction ,"v...mentS ..um.ng
standard conSlruCbOn.
[..........1
V////~
B CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE: N_
conmNClron or develOpmenl should be
unftnak... only .,... . d.c._
an...... of the noeM reduction re-
qu......l'lt . mede and need" ncM"
insulation featur.. mduded In tne
d.oogn,
The CIty of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
1i:-~n!11"~
CNEL OR Ldn Vllue (dbA)
60 65 70 75
80
8S
60
70
85
65
75
80
C GENERAlLY UNACCEPTABLE, N_ con.
.1IVClIon .. d,acourAOllct " new CQ(.SlNct-
ion Of deveAopment does pr~. . Oea.,iied
an~ 0' fhe noiM reduClfOft reQuue.
menta muat be made and lMeded nOtM in.
sulation 'Hlur.. lnCiuded in t". ~l9n.
D LAND USE DISCOURAGED: N_ ""n",r-
uctlon or develooment anoukl g.nerally
not be undertaken.
SOURCE: County of Riverside Comprehensi
General Plan, 1984
~THE
ClJ~NG
tlIlD COil! STIlEfT. SUTllll
_IIE>1iIC)tCA_l714l1il,_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 5 I
NORMALIZED NOISE LEVEL CORRECTIONS1
Measured CNELJ
Type of Correction Description Change (dBA)
Seasonal Summer (or year-round operation). 0
Correction
Winter only (or windows always closed). -5
Correction for Quiet suburban or rural community (remote from large cities +10
Outdoor Residual and from industrial activity and trucking).
Noise Level
Quiet suburban or rural community (not located near industrial +5
activi ty).
Urban residential community (not immediately adjacent to 0
heavily traveled roads and industrial areas.
Noisy urban residential community (near relatively busy roads -5
or industrial areas).
Very noisy urban residential community. -10
Correction for No prior experience with the intruding noise. +5
Previous Exposure
and Comm unity Community has had some previous exposure to noise but little 0
Attitudes effort is being made to control the noise. This correction may
also be applied in a situation where the community has not
been exposed to the noise previously, but the people are aware
that bona fide efforts are being made to control the noise.
Community has had considerable previous exposure to the
intruding noise and the noise maker's relations with the -5
community are good.
Community aware that operation causing noise is very
necessary and it will not continue indefinitely. TIlls correction -10'
can be applied for an operation of limited duration and under
emergency circumstances.
Pure Tone or No pure tone or impulsive in character. 0
Impulse
Pure tone or impulsive character present. -5
1 Source: "Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of Noise Elements of the General Plan," California Office
2 of Noise Control, February 1976.
Corrections to be added to the measured. weighted 24-hour noise level.
October 3, 1991
53
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The less sensitive uses identified as: industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, gold
courses, riding stables, water recreation, and cemetery uses would consider up to 75
CNEL as "normally acceptable" exterior noise levels. There are no "normally acceptable"
exterior noise levels identified for public assembly uses such as auditoriums, concert halls,
amphitheaters, sports arenas, and outdoor spectator sports uses.
A "normally acceptable" designation implies that a specified land use is satisfactory,
assuming that facilities are constructed by conventional practices. The category of
"conditionally acceptable" indicates that new construction or development should be
undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements are made and
that needed noise insulation features are incorporated into project designs.
California's noise insulation standards were officially adopted by the California
Commission of Housing and Community Development in 1974. In November of 1988,
the Building Standards Commission approved revisions to these standards (Title 24,
Part 2, California Code of Regulations). The ruling states that "Interior noise levels
attributable to exterior sources shall not exceed 45 dB in any habitable room. The noise
metric shall be either .., Ldn or ... CNEL, consistent with the noise element of the local
general plan." Additionally, the commission specifies that residential buildings or
structures to be located within exterior CNEL contours of 60 dB or greater of an existing
or adopted freeway, expressway, parkway, major street, thoroughfare, rail line, rapid
transit line, or industrial noise source shall require an acoustical analysis showing that the
building has been designed to limit intruding noise to an interior CNEL of 45 dB.
Riverside County
The Noise Element of the General Plan and the Riverside County Noise Ordinance
establish outdoor and indoor noise limits by land use. The Noise Element also contains
planning areas, noise objectives, programs and mitigations to ensure a compatible noise
environment between land uses.
Policies, detailed in the Noise Element, consider transportation and other noise sources,
standards, sensitive receptors, noise reduction measures and implementation potential for
these policies. Single and multiple family homes, group homes, schools and other
learning institutions, hospitals, convalescent homes, and parks and open space lands where
quiet is a basis for use, are considered noise sensitive land uses by the County.
The Noise Element of the County of Riverside General Plan discusses major sound
generators and noise sensitive land uses in the twelve Land Use Planning areas of the
County. The predominant noise source in the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning
area, which includes Temecula, originates from motor vehicle traffic along Interstate 15
(1-15) and State Route 71.
The County of Riverside has developed a "Land Use Compatibility Chart" based on the
standards recommended by the State of California. Figure 17 provides this noise/land use
compatibility matrix to determine if uses can be properly mitigated and allowed within
October 3, 1991
54
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
various exterior noise environments. It identifies "normally acceptable", "conditionally
acceptable", "generally unacceptable", and "land use discouraged" noise levels for various
land use types.
As shown in Figure 17, the following categories are designated "conditionally acceptable":
auditoriums, concert halls, amphitheaters, and parks and open space areas requiring quiet
up to 65 CNEL; residential, institutional, office, transient lodging, noise producing
recreational areas, and outdoor sports arenas up to 70 CNEL; and commercial uses up to
75 CNEL.
A "normally acceptable" designation implies that a specified land use is satisfactory in the
noted exterior environment, whereas "conditionally acceptable" indicates that new
development requires a noise analysis with mitigation provided to achieve acceptable
levels. By comparison, a "generally unacceptable" designation indicates new construction
should be discouraged and if it proceeds that a detailed analysis of noise reduction
requirements must be made and included in the design. The category "land use
discouraged" suggest that new construction should generally not be undertaken.
The \i'oise Element also provides noise level standards for land uses. Residential,
institutional, educational, and parks and open space areas requiring quiet are discouraged
in noise environments greater than 65 CNEL. Interior noise levels for business and
professional offices where effective communication is essential should be attenuated to
less than 45 dBA.
3.2.3 Existing Noise Environment
As a prerequisite to an effective noise control program, a community must be cognizant
of the location and extent of local noise problems; namely major noise source locations,
noise sensitive receptor locations and current levels of exposure. This data can then be
utilized to focus noise control and abatement efforts where they are most needed. In some
cases, the control of noise sources will be beyond the City's jurisdiction. However, by
recognizing these limitations, more effective land use strategies can be developed.
Ambient Noise Measurements
The determination of the major noise sources and the identification of noise_ sensitive
receptors provide the basis of developing a community noise survey. The noise
measurement survey completed by The Planning Center in July, 1991 was conducted at
19 locations to determine the ambient noise environment at these facilities. Monitoring
locations are identified in Figure 18. The main purpose of the noise monitoring was to
determine an existing noise profile for the Study Area that could be used in estimating the
level of current and future noise impact.
Table 6 provides noise measurement data and site descriptions for the 19 monitoring
locations. As shown therein, noise levels exceeded the 65 dBA criteria (established by
the County of Riverside for locating sensitive land uses) at five of the eighteen monitoring
locations which characterize mobile noise sources.
October 3, 1991
55
Existing Conditions Report
STATE LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
FOR COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE
Sports Arena, Outdoor Spedator Sports
COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE Ldn or CNEL, dB
55 60 65 70 75 80
LAND USE CATEGORY
Residential. Low density
Single Family, Duplex, Mobile Homes
Residential - Multiple Family
Transient Lodging. Motels, Hotels
Schools. Libraries, Churches, Hospitals,
Nursing Homes
Auditoriums. Concert Halls, Amphitheaters
Playgrounds. Neighborhood Parks
Go" Courses, Riding Stables, Water
Recreation, Cemetaries
Office Buildings, Business, Commercial
and Professional
Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities,
Agriculture
55
60
65
70
75
80
LEGEND
1:':':-:':':':':':-:':-:1 Normally Acceptable 11II
:::>:<:>:>::::: Sped~ land us. Is satislaclory. bas<<llJllOn Ih. assumplion thai
, ' ' , , , , ' , , , " any buildings In""Iv<<l a'. 01 norm" cony.ntiona' eonstruetion,
withoulany sPKial noI.. insulation r~ui'.....nts.
r::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 Conditionally Acceptable
?:ff{f{:\ N.w const,uction 0' d.y.lopm.nl should b. und.rtak.n only aft.r
a d.taij.d Inllysls 01 th. nols. ,<<Iuctlon r.qu".mtnts IS mid. and, _
nl<<l<<l nol.. Insulation r..tur.. lnelud<<l In th. d..ogn,
Cony."tion.1 construction, but with cloud windows .nd Ir.sh all
supply syst.ms 0' .11 conditioning wiM normdy lut,",-, Outdoo,
environment will s..m noisy.
Normally Unacceptable
tl.w conslrudion or d....lopm.nl should gln.,ally b. dis,
courag<<l, "nM conltructlon 0' d....lopm.nl do., p,oc.<<I, I
d_aNd an.lysls 01 th. noIs. ,.dUCIIon rl.qui,.m.nts must boo
mad. with n.<<I<<I nois. insulatloA 1..lu,.. indud<<l in th. d.,ign,
Outdoo, a,.., must boo Ihl.td<<l,
Clearly Unacceptable
Now construction 0' d.y.lopm.nl should g.n.,aUy not b. und.,.
takon. Construction COSIS 10 make thl Indoor environment
acclptable would b. prohibilive end the outdoor environmenl
would no! boo ulabl.,
SOURCE: California Office of Noise Control
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
[!J ~ THE
(X) =NG
1JIII 0lM STAEET. SUTE Q)
NEWl'OIlT 1lUCH, CA!IlIm I714l1r.l ,_
NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
l .~, .
II
-----.'.-
\
. .,.~'/
V !~
\\
- ----
.""......
I~ .("ci(~OIt
',,-
~
a
W Noise Measurement Location
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!] (Xl THE
ao=NG
13IlIl DOlE STIIHT. SUIt III
___a._INI.',_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 6 I
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Noise
Measuremen Measured Adjusted Land
t Location Day Time Leq Leq Use Description
1 7/19 5:28 p.m. 60.3 60.3 SFD Residence at comer of Roripaugh and Nicolas
2 7/19 5:19 p.m. 59.2 59.2 SFD Midbloclc noise from Calle Medusa
3 7/19 12:34 p.m. 58.8 60.2 MS Noise outside classroom at Margarita Middle School
4 7/19 5:00 p.m. 59.7 59.7 OS Park noise near playground and bar-b-que area
5 7/19 4:43 p.m. 65.0 65.0 SFD Noise from Rancho California Road; 20.25' above
grade
6 7/19 12:52 p.m. 54.6 54.6 ES Noise in front of classroom next to front parking
area; kids playing
7 7/19 1:46 p.m. 66.8 66.5 SFD Noise from Cosmic Dr. house 5 feet above grade
8 7/18 5:51 p.m. 67.1 67.1 OS Duck Lake Park; noise from Rancho California Road
9 7/19 2:36 p.m. 58.1 60.1 SFD Very high speeds on Pauba Rd; some noise
attenuation from vegetation and short brick wall
10 7/19 2:14 p.m. 54.7 62.2 OS Recreational park; noise from children, maintenance
activities, aircraft and Off-Road Vehicles in distance
11 7/19 12:15 p.m. 59.3 61.2 HS Noise at Temecula Valley High School baseball field
away from permanent school structures
12 7/19 5:50 p.m. 68.1 68.1 SFD Noise at corner of Front and Main
13 7/18 5:18 p.m. 66.9 66.9 ES Noise in front of Hillcrest Carden School from 1-15
and mobile homes
14 1/18 5:36 p.m. 58.6 58.6 CC Noise at La Petit Preschool child care center;
primarily from freeway, some from Santiago and
Ynez Rds.
15 7/19 4:01 p.m. 66.0 66.0- INO/ Noise at property line between CL SPharris Ready
-71.0 71.0 COM. Mix and office/retail parking lot
16 7/19 3:22 p.m. 59.9 62.0 SFD Residence at comer of Pala/Cupeno and Hwy 79
17 7/19 3:11 p.m. 55.1 $7.0 SFD Midbloclc residence setback from Hwy 79; adjacent
to Rancho Fruit Market
18 7/19 11:56 a.m. 64.0 65.6 MS Noise at Temecula Middle School; gardening and
maintenance activities on school property
19 7/19 3:40 p.m. 69.1 71.5 SFD Corner home with high speed vehicles on Pala Road
October 3, 1991
58
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Monitoring site 15 addresses stationary noise sources associated with the gravel operations
at a redi-mix plant. The noise level at this site ranged from 66.0 to 71.0 dBA at the
property line depending on the power setting of the redi-mix equipment. All other
locations indicate roadway noise combined with typical background levels at these
locations. Background noise was associated with children, lawn equipment, gardening
tools, aircraft and off-road vehicles.
The noise levels monitored throughout Temecula were indicative of an urbanizing
environment. These levels ranged from 57.0 dBA to 71.5 dBA after the sound was
adjusted to account for peak traffic volumes. Measurement locations were chosen as the
worst-case site adjacent to the primary noise source such as a major roadway. Mid-block
single family dwellings were considered typical for residential locations in the area.
Sismificant Noise Sources
Two types of noise sources should be considered in a community noise inventory:
stationary sources and mobile sources. Fixed sources of noise include airports, train
depots, industrial and construction activities, farming equipment operations, shooting
ranges, boating areas, air conditioning/refrigeration units, drag strips, concert halls, loud
whistles or bells, outdoor sporting events, loud radio, stereo or television usage, power
tools, lawn mowers, home appliances and barking dogs. Mobile noise sources are
typically transportation-related and include aircraft, trains, boats, automobiles, trucks,
buses, motorcycles, and off-road vehicles.
Although construction activities associated with public works projects or private
development occur throughout the City, they are generally localized and temporary. There
are no farming operations, concert halls, drag strips, boating areas, or shooting ranges in
the City of Temecula. Moreover, many fixed noise sources are typically accepted as part
of the ambient or background noise level.
Event Noise
There is one event in Temecula which has the potential to create significant noise levels.
For 15 years, the annual Great Temecula Tractor Race has occurred during October.7
Approximately 50 tractors enter the competition and from 50,000 to 60,000 spectators
watch the event, creating substantial crowd and motor vehicle noise. This event occurs
in a four square-mile area bordered by Winchester Road, Jefferson Avenue, and Cherry
Street. The three-day event runs from 10:00 a.m. until late at night. Noise from the
tractors, crowds and motor vehicles accessing the site may impact neighboring businesses
in operation during the event. There are no receptors considered sensitive to noise in the
vicinity of the event.
7
Source: Temecula Chamber of Commerce.
October 3, 1991
59
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Aircraft Noise
The French Valley Airport, shown in Figure 19, is a source of noise in the Study Area.8
The aircraft mix at this airport is mostly single-engine aircraft. Some multi-engine aircraft
and a small number of business jets and helicopters also use this airport. Of the 56,000
annual takeoffs projected, about 75% will be in the southerly direction over residences in
northern Temecula. The major noise impact from the airport is associated with takeoffs
in this direction where the 55 dBA CNEL contour extends out 10,000 feet. The airport
is equipped with night lighting, but ninety-nine percent of current airport operations occur
before 10 pm.
Motor Vehicle Noise
Motor vehicles in the Study Area are the major source of continuous noise. The Study
Area is bisected by a number of arterial roadways and Interstate 15, which is the major
north-south route between San Diego and Riverside. The major east-west roadways in
the City include Rancho California Road, Rancho Vista Road, Pauba Road, and State
Route 79 (Imperial Highway). The major north-south roadways in the City include Diaz
Road, Jefferson Avenue, Interstate 15, Winchester Road (SR-79), Ynez Road, and
Margarita Road. Additional roadways carry significant traffic levels and have adjacent
residential or other sensitive land uses. Land uses in the Study Area adjacent to the
roadways discussed above are affected by motor vehicle noise.
The highway traffic noise prediction model developed by the Federal Highway
Administration (RD-77-108) was used to evaluate existing noise conditions in the Study
Area. This model utilizes various parameters including the traffic volume, vehicle mix
and speed, and roadway geometry, to compute typical equivalent noise levels during
daytime, evening and nighttime hours. The resultant noise levels are then weighted and
summed over 24 hourly periods to determine the CNEL value. Contours are derived
through a series of computerized iterations to provide the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL locations.
These contour locations can be used as a planning tool to locate noise sensitive receptors
away from major noise generators. They apply only to first line receptors, as receptors
set back further from the noise source will benefit from the shielding provided by
intervening land uses. The contours do not ass.ume the presence of any sound walls or
barriers.
Table 7 provides the current noise levels adjacent to major roadways in the City of
Temecula, assuming a standard sound attenuation of 4.5 dBA with each doubling of
distance. As shown therein, the noise levels at 100 feet from the centerline of area
roadways currently range from a low of 46.6 CNEL along Margarita Road to a high of
78.4 CNEL along Interstate 15. The noise levels provided in Table 7 are typical for an
urbanizing area. The 70 dBA contour presently falls within the right-of-way along 32 of
the 67 roadway links analyzed.
8
Source: Final Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed New Rancho California Airport, May
1985.
October 3, 1991
60
Existing Conditions Report
FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT
NOISE CONTOURS
1-----..-----;.7.. \
I
I a
""--.
_Ill
~=:~
lOll....... fill
_Ill
I
I
I
I
N
I;:
I
Ii
'i
'!
j
I
i
:1
i
I
!
_11I1
AlJU) III) I
,
:~.
.~.
.
~
~~
~~
to:
&:
~~
s.:
of"
~/
II
i:
~
I
'I
&1
~
I
.
II
3
.
il
.
.
.
.
:,
.
.
.
.
~- c;;yc;p--~
I ~\
l I i~
'\., , I ,...J 8~ '
'v^-/ :1\ \. Ii ...,.:;~~
^'-/' "" ' ) ,~/ ~~! ,,*-$~
'",,_ A ~~
~/
--
~
~ IOdBA-l CNEL Noise Contour
SOURCE: Earth Metrics, 1986
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
~ CI:) THE
m~NG
till DlM! STllEET. !lITE 1IID
~IEIIOtCA~l7IlI.l,_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 7 I
EXISTING EXTERIOR NOISE EXPOSURE
Distance to Contours (Ft.)J
CNEL2
AnTl @
Roadway (Veh./Day) 100 Feet 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
:IINTERSTATB 15
: North of Wincheslcr Road
86.()(X) !
78.4!
362,
I
I
781 i :.682:1
North of Rancho California Road 77,000 77.7 326 703 1,514
North of Imperial Highway 72,000 77.4 309 666 1,435
South of City Limits 70,000 77.0 294 634 1,367
WINCHESTER ROAD (SR 79 North) , ,
, East of Diaz Road I 15,100 62.7 R/Wi 70 1521
East of Jefferson Road 31,600 65.9 53 115 248
East of Interstate 15 32,200 72.4 145 313 674
East of Ynez Road 17,200 69.7 96 206 443
East of Margarita Road 15,900 69.4 91 195 421
North of Nicholas Road 15,000 69.1 87 188 405
North of Murrieta Hot Springs Road 11,300 67.9 72 156 335
! NICHOLAS ROAD
II East of Winchester Road
, SOLANA WAY
5,0001
53.21
R/WI
R/W I 3~1
East of Ynez Road 13,700 57.5 R/W 32 68
East of Margarita Road 3,800 52.0 R/W R/W 29
.. MARGARITA ROAD
I,
II ~orth oi Solana Way
1,100;
46.6
RW
RW
RW
South of Solana Way 7,100 54.7 R/W 21 44
East of Moraga Road 5,800 57.1 R/W R/W 65
North of Rancho California Road 9,900 59.5 R/W 43 92
North of Rancho Vista Road 7,600 58.3 RfW R/W 77
North of Pauba Road 5,500 56.9 RfW R/W 62
North of Santiago Road 4,300 55.8 R/W 25 53
South of Santiago Road 3,800 55.3 R/W 23 49
North of Imperial Highway 2,700 53.8 R/W R/W 39
South of Imperial Highway 2,200 52.9 R/W R/W 34
" SOUlh or \1argama Road
I'
LO..mol
56.3,
R,W:
26:
.
I:
I
57 ~
,
'I
;MOI<<GA ROAD
October 3, 1991
62
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 7 I
EXISTING EXTERIOR NOISE EXPOSURE
Distance to Contours (Ft.)J
CNEV
ADTI @
Roadway (Veh./Day) 100 Feet 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
i!RANCHO C'lUFORNlA ROAD I
I
r West of City Limits : 2,0001 57.5' R/W! 311 68!
West of Diaz Road 7,700 63.3 R/W 77 166
East of Diaz Road 17,000 61.8 R/W 61 132
East of Front Street 29,500 64.2 41 89 191
East of Interstate 15 37,700 65.3 48 104 225
East of Ynez Road 29,500 64.2 41 89 191
East of Moraga Road 22,500 63.0 R/W 74 159
East of Margarita Road 13,400 65.7 52 112 241
East of City Limits 4,000 60.5 23 50 108
IRANCHO VISTA ROAD I.
East of Ynez Road 8,800 59.0 R/W 40 85 I
East of Margarita Road 4,300 55.8 R/W 2S 53
i
II PA UBA. ROAD
I
East of Ynez Road 3,000 54.3 R/W R/W 42
East of Margarita Road 1,700 51.8 R/W R/W 28
II
;ISANlUGO /WAD 3,6001 51.71 R/WI R/WI 28
I East of Interstate 15
IIJEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD
i . 1,1001 49.9, R,wl RW 21
! East ot De Portola Road
I
i IMPERIAL HIGHWAY (SR 79 South)
East of Interstate 15 18,000 68.8 83 180 387
East of Pala Road (S16) 10,000 64.7 44 96 206
East of Margarita Road 7,000 66.3 56 121 262
'I
: DL4.Z Ro.4.D
II North of Rancho California Road I 7,7001
,jJEFFERSON ..1 J'ENUE/FRONT STREET
,I
I
59.81
R/WI
451
9711
. North of Winchester Road 14.200 62.51 R;W! 68, 146':
South of Winchester Road 22,500 64.5 43 92 198
North of Rancho California Road 23,200 64.6 44 94 202
South of Rancho California Road 13,900 62.4 31 67 144
'I
II
I
October 3, 1991
63
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 7 I
EXISTING EXTERIOR NOISE EXPOSURE
Distance to Contours (Ft.)'
CNELz
ADT1 @
Roadway (Veh./Day) 100 Feet 70 dBA 6S dBA 60 dBA
North of Santiago Road 11,300 56.7 RfW 28 60
North of Interstate 15 8,800 59.0 RfW 40 85
I YNEZ ROAD !I
"
.1
:1 North of Winchesler Road
8.5m !
60.21
R/Wi
R;W!
1(l3:!
South of Winchester Road 25,200 64.9 RfW 99 213
North of Solana Way 20,400 64.0 RfW 86 185
South of Solana Way 16,100 61.6 27 59 127
North of Rancho California Road 17,900 62.0 RfW 63 137
North of Rancho Vista Road 12,300 63.1 35 75 161
North of Pauba Road 8,200 613 26 57 123
North of Santiago Road 8,200 553 RfW 23 49
North of La paz Street 4,300 52.5 RfW RIW 32
il DE PORTOLt ROAD
!. East of Jedediah Smilh Road
I'
! RAINBOW CANYON ROAD
,
1.500; 47.9j R'W: R\V' R.W:,
, , , 'i
'1
:I
1
2.5001 53.5 R/W' R.'W 37 ,
, , II
j. South of Pala Road (516)
.,
i PAlA ROAD (516)
South of Imperial Highway 11,000 62.6 32 69 149
South of Rainbow Canyon Road 9,300 61.9 29 62 134
:
'.LA PAZ STREET
Nonh of Imperial Highway 2,700 50.51 R/W: I~W 23
,
CAllE MEDUSA ROA.D
South of Nicholas Road 3,1001 51.11 RfWI RfWj 25
LA SERENA WA Y
~orth of Margarila Road 7.400j 54.9! R/\\i 21 .1S
West of Calle Medusa Road 4,4001 52.61 RfWI RIWI 321
1. ADT = Average Daily Traffic Volumes.
2. CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level. Measured at 100 feet from roadway centerline.
3. Measured from roadway centerline. R/W means contour is located within the roadway right-of.way.
October 3, 1991
64
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The 65 dBA contour presently falls within the right-of-way along 13 of the 67 roadway links
analyzed.
3.2.4 Sensitive Receptors
In the Study Area there are five major sources of noise:
1. Aircraft from the Fresch Valley Airport;
2. Traffic on the major arterials within the City;
3. Traffic on 1-15 and SR-79;
4. Industrial facilities; and
5. Events such as the Great Temecula Tractor Race.
Of these, the most serious problem is the noise level produced by motor vehicles on
Interstate 15 and other major arterials. A CNEL in excess of 65 dBA exists outside of
the roadway right-of-way along Interstate 15, Winchester Road, Solana Way, Margarita
Road, Moraga Road, Rancho California Road, Rancho Vista Road, Imperial Highway,
Diaz Road, Jefferson Avenue, Ynez Road, Pala Road and La Serena Way.
Current land uses located within the Study Area that are sensitive to intrusive noise
include libraries, parks, residential areas and schools. There are currently no hospital and
convalescent care facilities within the City's Sphere-of-Influence. The 65 CNEL is
generally considered the maximum exterior level acceptable for these uses. Noise
sensitive uses are permitted in areas with ambient environments in excess of 65 CNEL
if mitigation is provided to reduce noise to acceptable levels. Figure 20 details the
locations of sensitive park and school receptors within the City limits.
Residential uses are located throughout the Study Area, along both major and minor
roadways. These residential areas may presently experience significant motor vehicle
generated noise levels. Most major roadways in the City are projected to have 65 CNEL
contours located outside of the roadway right-of-way. Residential areas and other
sensitive land uses adjacent to these roadways could be exposed to noise levels higher in
excess of 65 CNEL. If a residence takes direct vehicular access from the roadwa y or if
the housing tract was not built with protective noise barriers, the noise exposure in these
areas would be considered excessive.
3.2.5 Relationship of Noise Conditions to State
Federal and Other Regulatory Requirements
Only in recent times have public institutions and community groups become vitally
concerned about noise and its effects on the health and welfare of the community.
Recognizing the increasing impacts of noise pollution and the value of noise information
to the Circulation, Land Use and Housing Elements of local government General Plans,
the California Legislature, in 1972, mandated the inclusion of a Noise Element in the
general plan process. Guidelines were then prepared by the State of California Office of
Noise Control (ONC) with specific requirements for a noise element.
October 3, 1991
65
Existing Conditions Report
SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
#
(/ I
~~
*\
\
v""-'; /
.~
\\
/~ ~~~
m School
o Library
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
~ (I) THE
PlANNING
, CENTER
1311I COIl: STIlEEr SUTE 1lO
_!lEACH. CA_I7I4.,,_
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
These requirements have been recently revised to reflect modem thinking about the noise
environment, human sensitivity to noise and the economic realities of local governments.
The contents of a Noise Element and the methods to be used in its preparation have been
identified in Section 65302(t) of the California Government Code and in the "Guidelines
for the Preparation and Content of Noise Elements of the General Plan" published by the
ONC. The requirements State that major noise sources and areas containing noise
sensitive land uses must be identified and quantified through noise exposure contours for
current and projected levels of activity within the community.
According to the Government Code and ONC Guidelines, the following major noise
sources should be considered in the preparation of a Noise Element:
· Highways and freeways
· Primary arterials and major local streets
· Railroad operations
· Aircraft and airport operations
· Local industrial facilities
· Other stationary sources
Contours may be prepared in terms of either the Community Noise Equivalent (CNEL)
or the Day-Night Average Level (Ldn) noise exposure descriptors. This noise exposure
information is to be incorporated into the General Plan to serve as a basis for achieving
land use compatibility with respect to noise through long range planning and project level
review. Noise exposure information should also be utilized to provide baseline levels and
identification of major noise generators for use in the development and enforcement of
a local noise control ordinance.
October 3, 1991
67
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECUlA
General Plan Program
3.3 Transportation/Circulation
Transportation and circulation conditions within the Study Area have a very significant
influence on the area's physical environment. Transportation directly impacts other
components of the physical environment such as air quality and noise and at the same
time are impacted by the land use component.
As documentation of existing transportation conditions in the Study Area, this chapter
discusses:
.
Regional and local access/circulation facilities which currently serve the City of
Temecula;
.
Existing traffic conditions;
.
Transit and other transportation modes;
.
Current transportation plans; and
.
Other transportation issues.
Existing and future land development, as it pertains to traffic generation, is an important
subject which will be addressed in the next phase of this study.
3.3.1 Existing Circulation System
The existing circulation system serving the Study Area is comprised of regional access
routes and local streets. A description of these facilities is provided in the following
. sections along with a summary of existing traffic conditions. Figure 21 depicts the
existing highway network in the Study Area.
Resrional Access
Interstate and State Route facilities passing through the City of Temecula and surrounding
area of influence include Interstate 15, Interstate 215, and State Route 79.
Interstate lS-Escondido Freeway is a predominantly north-south freeway which traverses
the western portion of the City. This freeway provides direct regional access to and from
San Diego County western Riverside County and western San Bernardino County. In the
Study Area, Interstate 15 is generally an eight lane facility with interchanges at State
Route 79 (south), Rancho California Road, State Route 79 (north)/Winchester Road,
Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and California Oaks Road.
October 3, 1991
68
Existing Conditions Report
STUDY A
CIRCULAl
ROAD"
Construe'
(!JIJ
.l&L~
Paved Road
Graded Dirt Road Or Under
City Boundary
.../"",,--
I!
i1
,
)
-----..."....
I ............"..___
,
I
I
\
\
\~
v\,
____J~-------------
I
I
If
~
;:
-'
/
~/....-
(
-'
I
,,}
.II
01'
I
J
I
~,>>
( ~
CITY OF TEMECUIA
General Plan Program
Interstate 21S-Escondido Expressway joins Interstate 15 between Murrieta Hot Springs
Road and Winchester Road and extends north as a four-lane facility. While not physically
located within the City of Temecula, Interstate 215 offers important regional connections
to Riverside and San Bernardino. Within the City's Sphere of Influence, Interstate 215
has interchanges at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Los Alamos Road.
State Route 79 (north), better known as Winchester Road, provides regional access
between Temecula and the Hemet/San Jacinto area as well as the BeaumontlBanning area
further north. The Winchester Road corridor generally aligned pamllel to Interstate 215
between Temecula and Hemel. Recent Assessment District 161 construction has widened
Winchester Road to a six-lane cross-section between Interstate 15 and Margarita Road.
The next phase of Assessment District 161 construction will extend the six-lane cross
section to Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
State Route 79 (south) connects with lower Front Street at Interstate 15 and extends
easterly along the north side of Temecula River to Anza Road. East of Anza Road, State
Route 79 turns south and passes through the communities of Aguanga and Warner Springs
towards its southern terminus at Interstate 8. State Route 79 (south) currently a two-lane
facility within the City of Temecula and its Sphere of Influence.
Local Street System
The configumtion and level of improvement of the local street system currently serving
the Study Area has principally been influenced by the following factors:
· The presence of Old Town Temecula;
· Topographic features and constmints;
· The historic location of State Route 79 Front Street and Rancho California Road
in the area and the subsequent construction of Interstate 15;
· The pattern of commercial/industrial development which has occurred along the
freeway corridor; and
· To a somewhat lesser degree, the pattern of residential development which has
occurred over the years.
Some of the original streets which were built in the Temecula/Rancho California area,
such as State Route 79, Rancho California Road, Front Street/Jefferson Avenue, and Pala
Road, were located along waterways and within the valleys formed by the area's natural
topographic feature. When Interstate 15 was constructed, the crossings of State Route 79
and Rancho California Road dictated where the freeway interchanges were to be built.
At the time the freeway was constructed an overcrossing was built at Santiago Road to
provide additional access between developing residential areas south of Rancho California
Road and the commercial core at the time (Old Town Temecula).
October 3, 1991
70
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Rancho California Road, Front Street/Jefferson Avenue, and Ynez Road were improved
earlier than many of the other roads in the area due to the intensity of commercial and
industrial development which occurred at the time. Many of the early residential oriented
streets such as Solana Way, W. Rancho Vista Road, W. Pauba Road, and lower Ynez
RoadlDe Portola Road were initially constructed as part of the original Rancho Villages
Specific Plan.
A graphic summary of existing area roadway network characteristics including a number
of travel lanes along principal roadways and intersection control features is presented in
Figure 22. A more detailed inventory of existing roadways is provided in the table
following:
The existing circulation systems within the Study Area is comprised predominantly of
two-lane and four-lane facilities. Four-lane sections exist along portions of Rancho
California Road, Front Street/Jefferson Avenue, Ynez Road, Margarita Road, and Diaz
Road. Six-lane roadway improvements are very limited and are currently located along
Winchester Road (1-15 Margarita Road) and Ynez Road (immediately south of Winchester
Road).
As depicted in Figure 22, there are currently 20 signal installations within the City. The
majority of these signals are located along Ynez Road, Front Street/Jefferson Avenue,
Margarita Road, and at the Winchester Road/I-15 interchange. Two additional signals will
soon be under construction at the Rancho California Road/I-15 interchange. Five
intersections within the City are controlled by 4-way or 3-way stop sign installations. All
remaining intersections on the primary street system are controlled by either 2-way stop
installations (at 4-leg intersections) or 1-way stop installations (at "T" intersections). In
these cases, the stop signs always control traffic approaching the intersection on the minor
street and the major street traffic remains uncontrolled.
Existins! ODeratins! Conditions
The documentation and analysis of existing traffic conditions within the City of Temecula
and its Sphere of Influence involved:
.
a comprehensive review of traffic studies which have been submitted to the City
for review since the City's incorporation;
.
a review of recent traffic studies prepared for significant development projects
located within the City's Sphere of Influence;
.
an inventory of existing roadway facilities;
.
a program of daily traffic counts (on selected roadway links) and peak hour
intersection turning movement counts; and
.
an evaluation of traffic operating conditions within the City and at sdected
locations within the Sphere of Influence.
October 3, 1991
71
Existing Conditions Report
SUla.o~J
cNOll DNllSlXa
J"~l.Uo:>
/:~"'I'u"o\l. /:11:> ----
~a'l'''(\ ~O 'I'"oll ,~I(l 'l'a'l'''~O -----
.3""'1 l3""~.L lCIS - a/19
.3U"'1 l3""~.L ~"Oa - 1"
d01S .(,,~-\: "
do,S .("~-,, ·
{"u'ilIS "UJ"~.L ·
",..-,//
,
.
~
1
/-..
,.."
I
r
~
~
\
\
~_-------_____~r----
~
')
"'..,
""" I
.
/"
V
',\,310U 3.!,.~3\{'\0 ..3lU" .u2IS
do,S .(q 'l'3l\0X\UOJ 3~" .uolt"3.~",UI \\'1
',\,310n 3.1,u3\{'\0 .S3\U"
s3u"l \3"Ul 0'" OA"q &h"'I'''o~ \\'1 :3101'!
ri@
/
AlIVWWflS XlIO.LN:ElANI XVMUVOll
8 :Elr:lRVJ..
AHAIPV I S<JU!I!38,i1
SU8!.1lS<JP<Jd
Al!AIPV
SDPI.JUd
SlU<JWWO;)
:>P!Sl!re3
uo D '1i' ;) ON
JY.ld!JIsun
JY.ld!JIsun
1A
1A
1A
MS
N
N
N
N
N
W
1
18:>'H
18:>'H
18:>'H
IS:>JUO
IS:>JUn
;xI.<.L
<JpIsq.rn;)
A
A
A
A
A
.J<Jnn~
1f1
sq.rn;)
UOlllpUO;)
<J38J.1ns
UOlllpUO;)
UUlp<JW
S<JUll']
JO #
poon
poon
poon
poon
poon
I:J
I:J
:>uoN
:>uoN
:>uoN
t
t
Z
Z
Z
OJ.
'P'H UOSJ:>JJ:>(
'P'H J:>ls:>lpU!M
'IS o(x)N
z:>pJeA x!I:>d
'P'H '~)"'H
WO.J,iI
P'H ZIl!O
-
'IS o(x)N
'P'H ';)''H
'JO :>:ieS
P'H ':)''H
<JWUN
IS (Ofnd
'JO ~Jed ss:>u!snH
J:>lS:>q::lU!M
'P'H ZIl!O
'P'H ZIl!O
l<J;}.JlS
:>:iP!lH :>ue']-t
:>JnpnJ1S :>:ieu!eJO
'P'H
1!re3 :>pJ!;) :>spdJ:>IU3 01
UOSJ:>!J:>( WOJ] ue!(X)w P:>SlR'H
1A
1A
1A
1A
MS
N
MS
MS
N
N
N
N
18:>'H
18:>'H
18:>'H
18:>'H
A
N
A
A
poon
poon
poon
poon
:>UON
:>UON
'H
'H
t
Z
9
9
dwe'H qN !;l-I
'P'H Rlpe8JeW
'P'H z:>uA
'P'H UOSJ:>JJ:>(
'P'H Rl!Je:iew
'P'H z:lUA
sdwe'H qN Sl-I
'P'H
'P'H
'P'H
'P'H
J:>ls:)q::lU!M
J:>ls:)q::lU!M
J:>lS:)lpU!M
J:>ls:)lpU!M
'P'H UOSJ:>!J:)(
'P'H s:iupdS
IOH Rl:)!JJnW
(s:)ueJ-Z) :iU!~J::lI:)^O !;lZ-I
(8:>ueJ-Z) :iU!SSOI:)J:)^O !;l-I
1A
N
N
18:>'H
N
poon
:>UON
Z
'P'H
J:)ls:>q::lU!M
':)^V UOSJ:)!J:>(
'P'H
s:iu!JdS IOH Rl:>!JJnW
1A
MS
1
IS:>JUn
N
d
:)UON
t
lS ,(JJ:)q:)
'P'H J:)ls:)q::lU!M
'P'H s:iupdS
IOH 1l1:)!JJnW
s:)uel-t )!:>:)J;)
s!pn.QJ:)D RltreS
1A
<lUe']
lplrell Il1!A
PIa SU!qoeoJddy s:lP!AIO P1!Oll
-<lSP!l8 <lJnPRJIS :>S1!U!1!J(J :>UrJ t
8S s:lUe'] ,
8N
'1A
'1A
'1A
'1A
'1A
'1A
W
'1A
'1A
1A
MS
N\.S
N
N
N
N
N\.S
N\.S
N\.S
N\.S
MS
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
H
N
N
N
18:>'H
Is:lll
1s;)1I
1s;)1I
1s;)1I
1s;)1I
ls;Jmn
ls;Jmn
1s;)1I
1s;)1I
18:>'H
A
A
N
N
N
A
A
A
A
A
A
poon
POOO
POOO
POOO
POOO
POOO
POOO
POOO
POOO
POOO
pooD
I:J
t
d
d
IJ:)
:>UON
IJ:)
;J:)
I:J
1I
d
:>uoN
t
Z
Z
,
Z
E
Z
Z
t
t
ewnZ:>luow e!A
'PlI '~),lI
'P'H O!'H 1:>0
'JO ou;uoW
'PlI ';:)'lI
'PlI o!ll PO
ewnz:)luow e!A
':>^V UOSJ:)!J:)(
lS 1uOJd
':>^V UOSJ:)!J:>(
oq!llsg OU!W1!J
"P1I oS1!nues
'JO oU:>JOW
"P1I qOU1!lI Il1!A Pia
Sl!Wn .(l!;:)
'PlI 1!11!d
'PlI zed e']
dW1!lf 8N Sl-'
qlnos 6L-lIS
'PlI 1!11!d
'PlI Z1!d e']
dW1!lI 8N Sl-'
oq!llsg OU!W1!J
"P1I OS1!!IUes
'.{Mlfd JJ^,1!H P:>lI
qJnOS 6L-lIS
IIlnOS 6L-lIS
IIlnOS 6L-lIS
'IS IUOJd
'IS IUOJd
IS IUOJd
IS IUOJd
'1A
'1A
N-N\.S
N\.S
N
N
1s;)1I
1s;)1I
N-A
A
POOO
POOO
;lUON
:>UON
,-t
t
'PlI 1!11!d
"P1I qOU1!lI H1!A PIa
"P1I qOU1!lI Il1!A PIa
"P1I qOU1!lI IleA PIa
'.{Mlfd .{:>II1!A noN\.
'.(Mlfd 1I^,1!H lY.l1l
DO!UOd p:xIol:>A:!pUn 01 pgdOpA:>(J
'Murd JJ^,1!H pr;lll WOJJ SUO!l!SU1!J,t
:>JnPRJIS
:>S1!U11!JO :>SP!l8 :>ue'] ,-:!P!S
1s:lN\. DO mlnO 'Ill qJn;:) "Il'lI1!^,:!P!S
lA
'1A
NI.5
N
N
N
1s;)1I
1s;)1I
A
N
POOO
POOO
:>UON
<looN
z
z
qlnos 6L-lIS
'PlI .{<lII1!A JloN\.
'PlI .{;lIl1!A JION\.
<lun .(Iuno;:) 'a's
'PlI 1!11!d
'PlI 1!11!d
~!sqI10N 00 MS oN 'lA MS '1 1$;1100 A J>OOn ;JUON z 'PM J:lIS:lq;)O!M lmlp:lW :>IIIQ 'PM S1!IQ;J' N
p:,^oooO U\ N '1 1$;1100 N d :lOON Z 1!snp:lW ;lIlIQ IOooJ!!) ;JIIIQ 'PM S1!fO;)!N
U\ MS W I$;IJOO A J>OOn :lOON 'l 'P1I S1!IO;)! N /i.1!M 1!O;lJ"S 1!'l esn!",w :>IIIQ
~!sqlloN 00 MS ON U\ MS N 1$;I1I A J>OOn ;looN 'l 1!Snp;lW ;lIlIQ !i.MlId SM.Op1!;lW /i. eM. 1!U;lJ"S 1!'l
:IJl!SlfIROS 00 MS ON U\ MS N 1$;I1I N d ;luoN 'l !i.MJld Sh\OP1!;lW 1!1J;l1ld 1!!A /i.1!M 1!O;lJ"S 1!'l
U\ MS N 1s:l1I A J>OOn :lOON z 1!1J:l1Id 1!!A 'PlI 1!1 !11!8J1!W /i.1!M 1!U;lJ"S 1!'l
'PlI q;)01!ll
U\ N N 1s:l1I N J>OOn ;looN Z SI!Wn /i.1!:J IS1!3 ;lS1!1S PP!JJ;lnna "PlI ':J'1I
'PlI qo01!ll
U\ MS N 1s:l1I A poon d t ;l11!1S PI;l!jJ;lnna "P1I 1!1!11!8J1!W 'PlI ':J'1I
'lA MS N 1$;111 A poon lI-d t 'PlI1!1!11!SJ1!W "JO J:lqwRH 'PlI ":J'1I
U\ N N 1s:l1I N poon :lOON z-( 'JO J:lqWRH 'PlI1!S1!JOW "PlI ':J'1I
:lp!5qlloN 00 MS W MS W 1s:l1I A poon liD ( "PlI1!S1!JOW :l01!'l ;l!po/i.'l 'PlI ':J'1I
U\ M.S N 1s:l1I A poon d-lI t ;l01!'l ;l!po.<'l "PlI :z:lOA 'PlI ':J'1I
SO!SSOJ;)J;l^C) St-I
(;lSp!1a) ;l0l!'] t U\ MS N 1s:l1I A poon 1I t 'PlI :z:lOA 'IS 100J.::I 'PlI ':J'1I
;lJRPIUIS ;lS1!O!1!JO
(;lSp!1a) ;l0l!'] t U\ MS N 1s:l1I A poon liD t 'IS 100J.::I 'PlI Z1!!0 'PlI ':J'1I
U\ MS N 1$;I1I A poon liD t 'PlI Z1!!O 'JO lIJ1!d SS;lO!Sna 'PlI ':J'lI
('PlI ':J'}!)
U\ N N 1s:l1I N poon ;luoN 'l 'JO lIJ1!d SS;lO!SRa Sl!Wn /i.1!J Is:lM 'PlI 1!!woJ!l1Q oq;)U1!lI
p;lO:ldo 0:r.xJ 100 s1!II /i.1!MP1!Oll U\ N N Is:lll N poon :lOON 'l 'PlI :lS1!1S ppgJ;lUna "PlI 1!1 !11!SJ1!W 'PlI 1!lol1od :l(]
U\ N N Is:lll N poon ;looN 'l 'PlI 1!1!11!8J1!W 'PlI1jl!WS q1!!JY.lP;lf "P1I 1!(OIlOd :l(]
J:lplnoqs
;lql 00 !",MOIl1! "'t /i.1!W SU!lIJ1!d U\ N N 1s:l1I N poon ;looN 'l 'PlI1jl!WS qe!JY.lP;lf "P1I OSe!lOllS 'PlI :z:lOA
'lA MS N Is:lll A poon :lOON 'l "P1I oSe!lollS 'PlI eqn ed 'PlI :z:lOA
U\ N N Is:lll A poon :lOON 'l 'PlI eqRed 'PlI ':J"1I 'PlI Z:lU A
'lA MS N 1s:l1I A poon liD t 'PlI ';)'1I !i.Ma J;JIO;lJ I:lSJ1!~ 'PlI Z:lO A
U\ N N I s:l1I N poon :lOON 'l !i.Ma J:lIO;lJ 1:l8Je~ /i.eM e01!IOS "P1I :z:l0 A
:lP!S lseg 00 M.S U\ MS N Is:lll A poon Ill;) l> /i.eM eoelOS "!i.MJId J1r.lJOIOW 'PlI :z:l0 A
aN :lol!']
t 1fl as s:loll"] 'l 5! oo!l:JQS :loll"] ( U\ MS N 1s:l1I A poon PI:J-d-lI (-9 !i.MJld J1r.lJOIOW llZ1!ld WI1!d 'PlI :z:lUA
U\ MS N Is:lll A poon d-lI 9 llZllld IDled "P1I J:lIs:lq;)O!M 'PlI Z;JO A
(SO!lIJOO
1jllM :loll"]l>X:lrnpIUlS :lSeo!eJo)
(JOI:Y.IIIo;) le!1lsnpoV SO!ll!1IS ON 'lA MS N 1$;)100 A poon :lUON l> "P1I J;lI$;lqOO!M. 'JO li.1!nbtJ 'PlI Z;JO A
U\ N N 1S:l1l N poon :lUON 'l 'PlI 1!1 !1eSJ1!W 'JO /i.1!nl:q "JO J:lIU;lJ /i.lono;)
(1OI:Y.IIIO;) le!1lSnpoV So!ll!1IS ON U\ MS N 1$;)1I A poon :lOON l> 'JO /i.1!1'btJ 'PlI Z;JOA 'JO J;lIO;lJ /i.luno;)
10;lwdop^;l0
lS11d M.S poe n1flJ ON
(;JSp!1n) ;lJRPIUlS ;lSeO!l!JO ;l0ll'l 'l U\ N-MS N I s:l1I N-A poon ;looN 'l ;lOn /i.luno;) 'PlI1!f1!d 'PlI OOAOIQ MoqO!1!lI
SUB!.IlS<lp;Jd
I AlIVWWIlS AlIO.LN3:ANI AVM.<IVOll I
8 3:'UIV.L
'lA Itt.S
- -
'lA Itt.S
- -
,^ Itt.S
- -
'lA Itt.S
80!d!l1S oN - -
'lA Itt.S
-
'lA Itt.S
-
l>.J01111> 10j MOIIV p(nO/tt. OO!P;JS 'lA Itt.S
-
:lp!slJlOOS 00 n:lfJ ON ,^ Itt.S
-
l>.J0111 S JOj MOIIV P(noltt. oo!lo;Js 'lA Itt.S
-
'lA N
-
p;lhOOOO 'lA N
-
'lA N
-
'lA Itt.S
-
80!d!JIS ON 'lA N
-
,^ N
-
80!d!l1S oN 'lA N
-
80!d!llS ON 'lA N
-
'lA Itt.S
-
'lA N
-
'lA Itt.S
-
aN :l0111 1
as s:l0111 Z 'lA Itt.S
-
'lA Itt.S
-
,^ Itt.S
-
80!d!llS oN 'lA N
-
'lA Itt.S
-
'lA Itt.S
- -
SOB!-Il~p;ld
AlIVWWflS AlIOl.N3:ANI AVA\<IVOll
8 3:'1HV.L
N
,
W
W
N
,
1l>.J1I
IglOO
IglOO
IglOO
1l>.J1I
IgJOO
J..
J..
J..
N
J..
J..
d
poon
poon
poon
poon
poon
d
:lUON
II(J
:lUON
:lOON
:lUON
E
I>
Z
Z
Z
Z
keltt. llUlllOS
PlI T.l0J..
p03
"PlI"JlI
A'8Itt. 1l0~
llO.rea IlJ>!O:lhV
A Illtt. llU:lJ;JS 111
llO.rea 11p!O:lhV
Allltt. llUlllOS
llPll(OJ llU!d :llllQ
11Sod:lll PO llP!U:lhV
"PlI Sl1(<X>!N
'PlI ,{OJl1:l)l
,{111tt. llUll(OS
I11J:lU:ln qlloN
1>1I l:I !l118mw
"PlIl:I!l118JCW
1>1I l:I !l118JIlW
1>1I l:I !l118JIlW
N
N
N
N
N
,
,
,
N
,
,
,
N
,
,
,
,
N
W
N
IglOO
1l>.J1I
IglOO
1l>.J1I
IglOO
1l>.J1I
IglOO
IglOO
Is:lJUO
IgJUo
IglOO
Is:lJO 0
1l>.J1I
IglOO
IgJUo
IglOO
ls:110 0
Is:lll
ls:llOO
Is:lll
J..
J..
J..
J..
J..
N
J..
J..
J..
N
N
N
J..
N
N
N
N
J..
J..
J..
poon
poon
poon
poon
poon
d
d
poon
poon
d
poon
poon
d-poon
poon
poon
d
poon
poon
d
d
:lOON
:lUON
:lUON
:lOON
:lUON
:lOON
:lOON
:lOON
:lOON
:lOON
:lUON
:lOON
:lOON
:lOON
:lUON
:lOON
:lOON
:lOON
:lOON
d
Z
I>
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
I>
I>
lJlnOS 6L-lIS
1>1I 1110uod :l(I
"PlIl:I!lIl8JIlW
qlnos 6L -liS
1>lIllqnlld
1>lI IllClA olpollll
PlI Ilqn lld
PlI l:Is,^ oqoulllI
"PlI "J"lI
"PlI l1(OIJOd :l(I
1>lIl:1 !lIl8JIlW
"PlI Illouod :l(I
1>1I l:I !l1l8JIlW
1>1I l:I !l118JIlW
1>1I l:I !l118JIlW
"PlI lJl!ms qll!JY.lP:lf
"PlI ql!ms qll!p;lp:lf
rom Old
"PlI T.lU J..
"PlI Z:luJ..
"PlIIlJ>U!13
llll llll1bs1ld ullS
"PlI J:lUJllltt.
llll Of:lllll^
"Ull!1V
.IS IlJ:lhllm!ld 111
MuJd Sh\Op1!:lW
.PlI l:I !l118JIlW
11lll1m<Yj llJ!W
.PlI III !lIl8JIlW
MuJd Sh\OP1!:lW
.PlI l:I !l118JIlW
.PlI ,{qSlDJO
1661 ~.nSnv JO n IcgJJ"" .uOIU'^UI :>ION
'PlI l:I !l1l8Jl1W .PlIl:Is,^ oqoulllI
llllllw<Yj IlJ!W .PlIl:Is,^ oqoulllI
'PlI L.lU J.. .PlIl:Is,^ oqoulllI
"PlI "J.lI 111l11811JOW
"PlIl:I!l1l8JIlW "PlIllqnlld
.u8!1V .PlI ,{qsmJO 'PlIllqnlld
lS llJ:lhJllm!ld 111
.PlI 11pU !l3
.PlI Z:lU A
"PlIl:I !JIl8JIlW
"PlI Of:lll:l^
"PlI Z:lU J..
"IS IUOJ~
qlnos 6L-lIS
.PlI Ilqn lld
llll 0811!IUIlS
llll 081l!IUIlS
llll o81l!IUIlS
llll Olll1!IUes
"PlI ZIld 111
llllllqnlld
.PlIllqnlld
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Current Traffic Volumes
Following an inventory of recent traffic counts reported in available traffic studies,
seventeen intersections and ten roadway link count locations were selected to augment the
existing count data. Available intersection counts were updated (where possible) when
found to be more than six months old. Daily traffic volumes for Interstate 15 and
portions of State Route 79 are based on published Caltrans 1990 traffic volumes. Existing
daily traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 23.
Within the Study Area, daily traffic volumes on Interstate 15 currently range from 70,000
vehicles south of State Route 79 (south) to 86,000 vehicles between Winchester Road and
Interstate 215. Immediately north of Interstate 215 volumes on Interstate 15 drop to
approximately 54,000 vehicles per day and then increase gradually to about 60,000
vehicles per day near Lake Elsinore. Interstate 215 carries approximately 39,000 vehicles
per day north of its junction with Interstate 15.
Within the Study Area, the heaviest travelled arterial segments include Rancho California
Road and Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Front Street/Jefferson Avenue. Both
of these overcrossing segments carry between 29,000 and 37,800 vehicles per day.
Portions of Ynez Road and Front Street/Jefferson Avenue (between Rancho California
Road and Winchester Road) accommodate traffic volumes approaching 25,000 vehicles
per day. Other heavily travelled arterial segments include:
· Rancho California Road, between Margarita Road and Ynez Road (22,500 to
29,500 vehicles per day);
· State Route 79, between Pala Road and Interstate 15 (17,000 to 18,000 vehicles
per day);
· Winchester Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Ynez Road (15,000
to 17,000 vehicles per day);
· Rancho California Road, between Diaz Road and Front Street (17,000 vehicles
per day); and
· Winchester Road, between Enterprise Circle (east) and Jefferson Avenue (15,100)
vehicles per day).
Peak hour intersection turning movement counts are presented in Figures 24 (AM peak
hour) and 25 (pM peak hour). The location of these intersections are shown in Figure 26.
A review of existing peak period intersection traffic counts indicates that the morning
peak hour typically occurs between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and the evening peak hour
typically occurs between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. Traffic flows at area intersections are
consistently heavier during the evening peak than the morning peak.
October 3, 1991
76
Existing Conditions Report
EXISTING DAILY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
( 1990 1991)
~ -
~
> ~
~!t~
In Tbou..nd.
1000 Vehicle. Per d.y
o
Nole: Ddly Volume. Expres.ed
. - O.i1y Volume Len Th.n
\
\
..
',~--
l
.;
~i
.
~ r
:. .
_~__J~_ . :
1 ------------
2~
~
,..J
~/,.-
he City of
'EMECULA
cneral Plan Pr02ram
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
or- L1
0) co ,...
Mil') C\I or- or-
... 1
..II ...IlL. r1
Santiago Rd. . De Portola Rd.
"'C
7.1 a: -,t 5.1 "'C
as a: .,tr-
-
'C .;t.;t as
4' as 1 ... - 0)1l')C\1
C\I 'C
0) as 0
~ 5' C\I
as 0)
~ ~
as
~
25 26
27 28
.. 330 o M .;t L 46
Il') co .;t
r 63 ...IlL. .. 257
r 11
SR 79 SR 79
"'C
189 ... .,r- a:
.I as .,tr-
228 ., "0 113 -
a: Il') co 'C
,... .;t 110 ... as ,... ,... 0)
as M 54 ., 0) Il')
~
as as
a.. ~
SOlJ<<:E: WLBUR SMTH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
'-ggllI...,.-T.""'.
........IIfOtCA_"-.....
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I"'- (J')
I"'- .q- I:" 263 1. 276
C,O C")
..J I.
... 579 ... 620
Winchester Rd. Winchester Rd.
(/) (/)
324 .. 0- .J 0- ..,tr*
88 " E 271 E
~ ~
a: 615 .. a: C\I C\I C")
C\I ~
CD CD C\I C\I
(J) Z
l!) l!)
~ ~
I 1 2 I
- -
3 4
co Ln C") 1. 166 C\I 1. 35
LnC,OC\I OLnC,O
~ ~ ~ ~.q-~ ... 554
..JlL. ... 684 ...IlL.
r 569 r 210
Winchester Rd. Winchester Rd.
.J cD .J ..,tr
> .,tr
53 <( 155 "'0
236 .. C 272 .. a: .q-LnC\l
0 (J')C\lC,O
co 0 .q- N LnLnCO
68 " (/) ~ C\I 388 " Q) C")
'- C
Q)
~ >-
Q)
J
SOURCE: WLB~ SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Dil~~
~IXM~SII'I.
~lUOtr.a_,",,,,,
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOUMES
<.0 -.:T L 382 Lo
<.0 -.:T 0
a> N T"" +- 1 <.0 N 0 .. 252
..IlL. r 143 ..IlL. r 15
Solana Way Solana Way .
1J
a:
.J 1J -,tr .J as ..,tr+
2 14 -
a: "i::
3 ... M T""" 0 72 .. as co 0 a>
N <.0 <.0 0) -.:T
0 , Q) T""" 103 , ~ N
C as
>- ~
13 14
15 16
L 254 a> L8
NLn T""" 0
MO T""" <.0 1.0 +- 4
T""" T"""
II.. r 73 ..IlL. ro
Rancho Vista Rd. Santiago Rd. -
1J tr 62 .J 1J ,tr-
a: 10 ... a:
N 1.00 T""" co -.:T
COM N M <.0
Q) T"" 24 , Q)
c c
>- >-
SQlEE: WLBUR StvtTH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DfI]~
<:;ENTER
~IUII~~.
JrftlIIlaIrIllll::ka._",,__
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Ct) T""
co C\I
~ ~ - 984 L 462
..J L. r 224 ... 973
Rancho California Rd. Rancho California Rd.
en en
596 _ a. .1 a. "r-
133 , E 218 E
a:s a:s
a: 788 ... a: COm
co co
CD CD C\lT""
en Z
LO LO
T""" T"""
..-!.. 5 6 I
7 a
m (0 L 492 C\I Ct) L 105
(0 (0 C\I Ct) (0 ~
m T"" C\I +- 562 C\I T"" (0
..ItL. .Ill. ... 869
r 320 r 134
Rancho California Rd. Rancho California Rd.
104 .1 - ..,tr- 164 .1 "'0 ..,tr-
229 ... en 512 ... a:
- Ct) co ~ o co (0
79 c: ~ T"" f'. 246 N LO Ct) T""
, 0 T"" Ct) T"" , Q) Ct) T"" T""
Lo- c:
U. >-
SOURCE: WLBUA SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
~E:IM"'Il'IW'T""""
....., II.CM CA_lJII....
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
It)m
l"'-T"'" L 242
.JL. ... 293
.r 278 ... 510
Front St. en SR 79 en
0.. SR 79
E 0..
E
ea
131 _ a: .I ea ..,r-
a:
58 " (l) 22 (l)
CJ) 308 ..... Z T"'" 0)
LO co l"'-
or- LO
I or-
- I
21 22
23 24
T"'" L 125 L 33
0) 0) C\I C\I
T"'" T"'" It) ll') T"'" C\I
...IlL. ... 0 ..IlL. - 639
r 56 r3
Santiago Rd. SR 79
.I ..,tr- .I ..... .,tr-
1 ..... 37 CJ)
0 ..... CJ) 397 - N
..... C\I co co ea CO') co T"'"
C co ~ 18 a.. ~ T"'"
1 ., 0 C\I .,
L- ea
u. ~
SOIJICE: WLBlR SMTH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~NNJ
W.lZM~""""
...-all1I.CM ca_'"".......
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Counts not available when
the report was printed.
I"'- L 80
"=t C\I
"=tLt')
lL. r 156
"U Nicolas Rd. Murrietta Hot Springs Rd.
a:
~ "U
CD tr- a:
1i) ~
CD CD
.c 0') co ....
(.) en
COlt') CD
C C\I .c
~ (.)
C
33 34 ~
35 36
Lt') co L 54
coo 0 C\I
Lt')C\1 C\I C")
..It II.. r 36
Rainbow Canyon Rd. Pauba Rd.
56 .1 "U ,t "U tr+
a:
81. a: T""C\1 coco
T"" T"" N COT""
~ "=t CD T""
~ C
a.. >-
SOlR:E: WLBLfl SMTH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~
'-IPiDlI"...-rUTI_
.....-an'IUCkCA_~......
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
ll) 0 L4
C"')C"') "" ""
COll) (1)C\lCO
.J1- ..JlL. ... 2
r7
Overland Dr. Via Montezuma
26 .f Q)
~ .,t 68 .1 +-' ,tr-
42 , c C"') C\l 4 .. (f)
0 ll) (J') +-' o ll) C\I
(j) C"') 46 ., c co ~ C\I
~ 0 '<:t
Q) ~
~ LL
Q)
"""')
17 18
19 20
'<:t L3 0 L6
ll) co "" C\l
~ C"') C"') C"') C\l '<:t - 10
-0 .JlL.
.JlL. r1 r9
Del Rio Rd. Main St.
6 .1 . ..,tr- 54 .1 +-' .,tr-
.-
0 ... (f) 5 ... (f)
+-' '<:tC"')"" +-' ~ C\l co
C "" C"') 21 ., c '<:t 0 -
43 ., 0 co 0 C"')
~ ~
LL LL
SOURCE: WIlB~ SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
O QD ~NNING
aD CENTER
~m:M:'P'U"T""'''
__ ~IUOtC&_D\e._
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
- L 143 (1) L 293
.-
~ (j) ~ ~
"" '<:t ~ (\1 .. 322 co 0 ~
.JlL. w ..JlL. ... 525
-
r...: r 114 r 10
0
Rancho California Rd. Rancho California Rd.
.::&::
.1 ~ .1
(\1 ..,tr- .,tr-
1 a.. 45 "'0
143 ... (j) C"') ~ C"') 269 ... a: o C\l co
(j) ~ co
7 , CD 1 , N
C <0
(j) 0
~
CD
9 10
11 12
"'0 L 40
0: co (1)
ll) C\I ""
C\l (\1 ~~C"')
C"') C"') 0) L ... 381
C\l ll) ~lL.
(\1 28
.JI.. ~ r 15
0 .. 757
~
Rancho California Rd.
Rancho California Rd.
.1 "'0 ..,tr-
78 .f 37 a:
(\1
154 ... +-' (1) 0 (1)
435 ... 'C
83 ., (\1 o (J')
,...
0)
~
(\1
~
SOURCE: WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~
~1lIiM~.......
........~Q,-""-...
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
0
'<:t ~ L 114
"" C\l ,...
... 236
.JtL. r 120 ... 498
Murrieta Hot ~ Springs Rd. en
Murrietta Hot~ Springs Rd.
E
184 .. (\1 (\1
0: 36 .f 0: ..,tr
2' CD CD
(f) 188 .. Z C\l o C\I
to to ,... co
or- or-
C\J C\J
I I
37 38
39 I
C"') L 13
C\l o '<:t ... 578
..IlL.
r6
Murrietta Hot Springs Rd.
51 .f Q)
~ ..,tr
307 ... r:: ,... o co
0 ,...
6' (j)
.::&::
(,)
<0
"""')
SOURCE: WIlEUl SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
c-.Ul;IIIIII....-r:U"l'I..
~1IIOt.(A_N.....
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
~ L 39
It)""
.. 106 ...- ~
II.. r 273
r 61
Margarita R~. "'0 La Serena Way
a:
"'0 (\1 tr
46 ... 0: .,r +-'
'C
97 ., (\1 <0
0) ""It)
0) co 0 ~ coco
(\1 '<:t C'? <0
~ ~
0
~
29 30
31 32
CO(J') L 11 C\l~"" L 28
C"')1t)~ C\lC"')1t)
... 0 ..J1L. .. 9
...lL. r1 r 23
Pauba Rd. "ti Rancho Vista Rd.
0:
17 .J (\1 .,t~ 11 .1 "'0 .,tr-
+-' 0:
'C
0'" <0 ~co~ 27 ... (\1 ...-C\l""
0) C\l .-
'C ...- C'? ...-
l' ~ 2'
(\1 (\1
~ 0)
~
(\1
~
SOURCE: WIlEUl SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
~1lDII~1U1'I"
_ ~lI.fOtca_lnt....
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
co (j)
0 co L 545
It) '<:t 1:"253
..IL.
... 542 .. 545
Winchester Rd. Winchester Rd.
en en
1151 ... a. .1 a. -,tr
191 , E 576 E
(\1 <0
0: 1129 ... 0: "",...co
co 0
CD CD ~ '<:t
(f) Z
to to
or- or-
I 1 2 I
3 4
co 0 L 125 '<:tit) L 25
It) C\I (J') co ~ co
coC\lC\l .... 274 ~,...'<:t
.IlL. ..JlL. .... 360
r 334 r 150
Winchester Rd. Winchester Rd.
.1 Q) .1
> .,tr- -,tr
142 <t: 245 "'0
709 .. r:: o 0 co 494 ... a: CO""~
0 (J')It)CO N It) 0 '<:t
82 , en C"') co 678 , Q) It) ~ _C\1
~ C
Q)
~ >-
"""')
SOURCE: WIlB~ SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
.......SIfI..
==IUOtCA_""_~
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
co '<:t
C"') ""
C\I ll) L 571
.. 759
..I L. r 280 .. 793
Rancho California Rd. Rancho California Rd.
en en
1313 ... a. .1 a. "r-
251 , E 366 E
(\1 (\1
0: 1525 ... 0: C\Ico
CD CD C"')'<:t
~'<:t
(f) Z
to to
or- or-
I 5 6 I
7 8
co co '<:t L 354 "" '<:t co L 166
~ C\I (J') co ~ ""
~ ll) '<:t C"') C\l ~
..JtL. +- 271 ...IlL. ... 828.
r 383 r 192
Rancho California Rd. Rancho California Rd~
116 .1 .- ..,tr- 378 .1 "'0 ..,tr-
686 .. (f) 1297 ... a:
+-' ll) ll) co (1) co 0
126 c co '<:t C'? 312 , N co~co
, 0 C\l C'? Q) ,... C\l ~
~ C
LL >-
SOURCE: WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!J~~~
~CDIIl!~.....'"
.........IUOtCA_"".....
:n_ f""'T~~-:-
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
- L 18 co L 90
.-
ll) en '<:t 0
C"') '<:t co (\1 .. 209 co v C"')
w ..JlL. .. 296
~lL. -
r...: r 146 r 34
0
Rancho California Rd. Rancho California Rd.
.::&::
.1 ~ .1
(\1 ..,tr- .,tr+
8 a.. 47 "'0
338 ... en "" ~ C\l 561 ... 0: C\l C\l (J')
en ~ ~ C"')
24 , Q) ~ 2 , N
C (\1
en 0
~
CD
9 10
11 12
o (J') C"') L 59
C"') C"') co
~ C\l ...-
"'0 ..IlL. .... 295
0: r 23
v (\1
C\l C\I 0) L
C\l '<:t
(\1 52 Rancho California Rd.
.JL. ~
0 ... 571
~ "'0
236 .f 0: .,tr-
Rancho California Rd. (\1
385 ... .- ll) 0 co
304 .f 'C
149 , (\1 C'? C"') C\l
0) ...-C\l
~
974 .. (\1
~
Sou:K:E: WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~=~
E.-IIM~"".
~~-"".....
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
L 63 r--
coo coC"')
...-0 COC"')
~ ...-
II.. r 75 .Jt
"'0 Nicolas Rd. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.
a:
~ "'0
Q) tr* 102 .f 0: ,t
u; ~
Q) Q)
..c ~co 191 , u; '<:tit)
(,) C\lC\l Q) coC\l
C co~ ..c C\IIt)
~ (,)
r::
33 34 ~
35 36
(j) C"') L 88
C\lco C"') co
COC"') C\l co
...It tL. r 62
Rainbow Canyon Rd. Pauba Rd.
121 .J "'0 ,t "'0 t~
36 , 0: It) co a:
...-CO coO)
(\1 C\I N ""It)
(\1 Q) v
c
a.. >-
Sou:tCE: WIlEUl SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
WlGQIlII rnwn,.......
~""'~_lne"_
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
C\l co L 262 "" Lo
o '<:t C\l r-- 0
COIt)'<:t +- 2 ... 154
..JtL. r 130 ..IlL. r 30
Solana Way Solana Way .
"'0
a:
.f ..,tr- .f (\1 .,tr-
10 "'0 42 +-'
'C
6 ... 0: '<:t "" "" 279 ... (\1 C"') co ""
N ~ '<:t 341 0) o ~
6 ., Q) '<:t C\I , ~ C\l
(\1
C ~
>-
13 14
15 16
L 177 co L5
C\llt) co C"')
0) co 0) ,... C"')
C\lC"') ... 2
tL. r 55 ..IlL. r3
Rancho Vista Rd. Santiago Rd.
"'0 tr 170 .1 "'0 ,tr-
0: ... 0:
N oco 8 "" 0 -C\l
Q) coC\l 34 N ,...""
C\l,... , Q) ,...
c c
>- >-
SOURCE: WILBUR SMTH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!J~~~
~1lIII1~"""_
.......-cJn'atotc;a_"".....
:"11_ ~
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
,... L 71
C\lCO
.. 165 C\lco
r 75 1L. r 230
Margarita Rd. "'0 La Serena Way
a:
"'0 .,r (\1 tr-
215 ... 0: +-'
'C
136 ., (\1 (\1 ""'<:t
0) C\l It) 0) ~""
(\1 (J') C\I ~ C\lC"')
~ ~ ~ (\1
0 ~
~
29 30
31 32
C"') ~ L 48 "" ,... C\l L 141
o 0 C\l (J') 0
~ ~ co ,... ,... ~
.. 29 ..JlL. ... 122
..JlL. r 31 r 47
Pauba Rd. Rancho Vista Rd.
"'0
42 .f 0: 72 .f "'0
(\1 ..,tr- 0: -,tr
+-' (\1
'C
29 .. (\1 ~ It) co 81 _ .- ,... "" C\l
'C
0) 0) (\1 o co C"')
25 , 47 , ~ ~
~ 0)
(\1
~ (\1
~
SOlR:E: WLBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~N'NG
CENTER
~CIM'~""'..
~~CA_~"_
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
co L1
""
C"')~ It)
C"') co ~ .. 1
..It ..JlL.
r1
Santiago Rd. De Portola Rd.
"'0
12 .f a: ..,t 23 .1 "'0
(\1 0: .,tr
+-' (\1
8' 'C C\I co
<U ~ 0 1 _ +-' '<:tv..-
~ 'C co
0) 6' (\1
~ 0)
(\1 ~
~ (\1
~
25 26
27 28
... 231 C"') C\l C\l L 29
C\l C\l co
r 94 .JlL. .. 184
r3
SR 79 SR 79
"'0
397 .. .,~ a:
.1 (\1 ..,tr
456 , "'0 36 +-'
'C
0: 0 C\l 293 ... (\1
C\l "" V co v
(\1 C\l 6 , 0) C\lC\l
(\1 ~
(\1
a.. ~
SOLflCE: WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
IDaEM'IftIIWf......
. _.. ...-an'IIIOl.CA_l7'4....
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
It)
0)"" L 264
vC\l .. 152
..IL.
r 189 ... 290
Front St. en SR 79 SR 79 (j)
0- 0-
E E
(\1
381 ... 0: .1 (\1 -,r-
a:
134 ., CD 66 co
(f) 590 ... Z ..- ""
to It) ~
to ~
or-
I or-
I
21 22
23 24
v (J') L 95 ..- 0 0 1. 85
'<:t (J')
o '<:t T- It) ~ It)
... 0 ..IlL. ... 479
.JlL. r 74 r7
Santiago Rd. SR 79 -
.1 ,tr- .1 +-' .,tr-
2 .- 69 (f)
0 .. (f) 757 ... N
.- T- ..- 0) <0 v C"') It)
c 1.t') 0 34 , a.. C\l
0 , 0 C\l..-
~ as
LL ...J
SOURCE: WLBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DaDTH:
aD~
"'E:IM~........
~IIIOtCA_"..._..
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
T"" L 16
""'<:t
It) co V
'<:t 0
..Il co co co ... 1
..JlL.
r 38
Overland Dr.
Via Montezuma
92 .f Q)
> .,t
<t: .1 ..,tr-
72 , c "" co 120 .-
0 It) C"') (f)
en co 6 .. o C\I co
+-'
~ C co ~
Q) 134 , co
~ 0
~
Q) LL
"""')
17 18
19 20
C\l L6 0) L 28
"" C\l o C"') 0
~ co It) co '<:t ...- ... 12
... 0 ..JtL.
..JlL. r 11 r 39
Del Rio Rd. Main St.
8 .1 +-' ,tr- 92 .1 +-' ..,tr+
1 ... (f) 5 .. (f)
+-' '<:t ~ ~ .- ...-c:o.co
r:: '<:t (J') ~ 98 , c It) co
94 , 0 It) 0 C\l
~ ~
LL LL
SOURCE: WLBUA SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!J~~~
~atM~......
..-aft' IUD4.CA _ .,.......
:. ,a_ tf"""'1ioo' ~"6000-:-
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
co
'<:t It)
co 0 ~ .. 276 L 254
..JtL. r 214
.. 492
Murrieta Hot ~ Springs Rd. (j)
Murrietta Hot~ Springs Rd.
E
512 ... (\1 <0
0: 116 .f a: -,tr
26 , CD co
(f) 638 .. Z co 0 0
to to co
C"')
or- or-
C\J C\J
I
- I
37 38
39
co L 32
C\l co
,... 0 ~
..JtL. ... 566
r6
Murrietta Hot Springs Rd. -
150 .f Q)
~ .,tr+
790 .. c vOC\l
0
10 , (j)
.::&::
(,)
(\1
"""') I
S~E: WIlEUl SMITH ASSOCIATES
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D~~~
~CDllmB'T.~...
~-..ot(A_0'4....
L'l[lS3~ SISX'1VNV 3JIA~3S
) 'lM3'l NOI.L;)3S~3J.NI
....................,
,
,
\
\
\
\
'...._-
i~ri(i]
UUJ:OOJd ueld IeJ~u~[
V'lfl:)3W31
}O hl!:J ~qJ
S~'1nStnI SISAlVNV 3::JIA~3:S
dO '13:A3:'1 NOll:J3S'M3.LNI
.;J
'aawnla"" .lnoq ".ad uo p;u:.q, 'o..I.1w.
,WU.'J. A.lWU1UlHiUd 8laam uOJl::Jall...la,UI _
("OJ.A.Z"S JQ F'.~ ~d) aOJA.las so Ta....., Prt -
~
aotA-Jas
JO
'p.,oa ..la.lat{\o ss:atun ,1allaq .10
t....a'J ,. Junuad.o an suon::JaualUI
s
(3)<<
::t'\ON
............."
,
\
\
\
\
'....._-
/
f ,
I '
--------,
~=i(i]
W1U(jOJd ueld leJ:lU:l~
V'lOJ3W3J
JO hl!J ~qJ
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Based on intersection turning movement counts taken within the last six to twelve months,
the busiest intersections within the Study Area are as follows:
1. Rancho California RoadlYnez Road -
2. Rancho California RoadlI-15 NB Ramps
3. Rancho California RoadlFront Street -
4. Rancho California RoadlI-15 SB Ramps -
5. Winchester Road/Jefferson Avenue -
6. Winchester Road/l-15 NB Ramps -
7. Winchester RoadlYnez Road -
8. Winchester RoadlI-15 SB Ramps -
9. Rancho California Road/Moraga Road -
10. Rancho California Road/Margarita Road -
(4,499 total entering vehicles per hour)
(3,833 vehicles per hour)
(3,722 vehicles per hour)
(3,415 vehicles per hour)
(3,377 vehicles per hour)
(3,369 vehicles per hour)
(3,204 vehicles per Hour)
(3,134 vehicles per hour)
(2,167 vehicles per hour)
(2,072 vehicles per hour)
With the exception of the Rancho California Road intersections at Moraga Road and
Margarita Road, the most heavily utilized intersections are clustered in the vicinity of the
Interstate 15 interchange at Rancho California Road and Winchester Road.
Traffic Conditions
Existing traffic conditions were evaluated at 39 intersections within the City of Temecula
and its Sphere of Influence. Traffic operations during the morning and evening peak hour
was assessed for each intersection using the following analysis techniques:
· Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Operational Analysis Method - This method
was used for those intersections which are currently signalized, or will be in the
near future. In this analysis method, Level of Service (LOS) provided to traffic
using the intersection is estimated based on calculated average vehicle delay time
at the intersection.
· HeM Unsignalized Intersection Analysis Method - this method was used for
intersections controlled by one-way or two-way stop sign installations. In these
cases stop signs are used to control the minor side street traffic while the major
street through traffic remains uncontrolled. The HCM Unsignalized Intersection
Analysis method evaluates only those traffic movements at the intersection which
are required to stop (all side street traffic) or yield (major street left turns onto
side street). In this method of analysis very general ranges of delay and LOS are
based on a calculation of reserve capacity for the individual restricted/controlled
traffic movements.
· HCM Four-Way Stop Analysis Method - This method was applied to existing
"four-way stop sign" controlled intersections. In this method, a total capacity
value is calculated for the intersection, according to the number of vehicles and
traffic lanes at each approach, and then compared to the total volume of traffic
entering the intersection. Based on the volume-capacity comparison a general
LOS can be estimated.
October 3, 1991
81
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
· Intersection Capacity Utilization (lCU) Analysis Method - This analysis method
was applied to all currently unsignalized intersections to approximate the LOS
which would be provided if the intersections were signalized. In this method,
capacity values (per hour of green signal time) are calculated for each movement
(e.g. left turn, through, right turn) at each approach and then compared to the
traffic volumes counted for each movement. The leu value is determined by
adding the proportion of green time necessary to accommodate the critical
conflicting movements at the intersection. The leU value can be used to provide
a general assessment of LOS for the intersection.
The term "Level of Service" (LOS) represents a qualitative measure of the traffic
operating conditions. Although the term was originally conceived to describe traffic
conditions on a section of roadway, it is also commonly used to describe general
operational characteristics of traffic at intersections. It is important to understand,
however, that LOS can be based on different criteria depending on the method of analysis
used. As noted above, the intersection analysis methods applied in this study produce
LOS approximations which are based on different criteria including average vehicle delay,
reserve capacity, volume-capacity comparisons, and intersection utilization values. As
such, it is not possible to directly compare LOS designations produced by one method of
analysis with those produced by another method of analysis. Caution should be used in
the interpretation of the intersection analysis results presented in the following sections.
Results of the intersection analyses are summarized in Tables 9 through 12 and
graphically displayed in Figure 27. Intersection analysis worksheets are provided in
Appendix _'
Signalized Intersections - Of the 18 signalized intersections which were analyzed, 14 were
evaluated to be operating at LOS e or better during both the morning and evening peak
periods. As reflected in Table 9, three intersections were found to operated at LOS D
during one or both of the peak hour periods. These include the Winchester Road
intersections at Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road and the Rancho California Road
intersection at Ynez Road. One intersection, Rancho California Road/Front Street, is
currently operating at LOS E during the evening peak hour.
One-way and Two-way Stop Controlled Intersections - The analysis techniques.. used for
evaluating this type of intersection focuses on selected traffic movements at the
intersection which must stop and/or yield to other traffic. Since these traffic movements
conflict with and must yield to other traffic movements, they are subject to potential
delays. In this analysis method, through traffic and right turn traffic on the major street
are assumed to operate under free flow conditions since these movements are not required
to stop or yield to other traffic at the intersection.
It is important to note that LOS designations reported in Table 10 correspond to individual
traffic movements and do not represent the overall intersection LOS. An important factor
to consider while interpreting the analysis results, is the number of vehicles which would
be subjected to the operating condition (LOS) noted for the individual traffic movement.
October 3, 1991
82
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 27 INTERSECTION ANALYSES
October 3, 1991
83
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 9 I
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Average Delay LOS Average Delay LOS
(SeC/Veh) (SeC/Veh)
1. Winchester Rd./I-15 SB Ramps 12.0 B 14.5 B
2. Winchester Rd./I-15 NB Ramps 16.3 C 23.6 C
3. Winchester Rd./Jefferson Ave. 25.5 D 38.6 D
4. Winchester Rd./Ynez Rd. 23.6 C 28.4 D
5. Rancho California Rd./ 11.9 B 19.6 C
1-15 SB Ramps
6. Rancho California Rd./ 15.5 C 13.6 B
1-15 NB Ramps
7. Rancho California Rd./Front 51. 24.8 C 50.4 E
8. Rancho California Rd./Ynez Rd. 28.0 D 30.6 D
10. Rancho California Rd./Diaz Rd. 12.7 B 12.6 B
11. Rancho California Rd./ 14.1 B 21.2 C
Moraga Rd.
12. Rancho California Rd./ 19.1 C 22.3 C
Margari ta Rd.
13. Solana WaylYnez Rd. 13.5 B 23.3 C
15. Rancho Vista Rd./Ynez Rd. 12.5 B 23.6 C
16. Santiago Rd./Ynez Rd. 13.5 B 14.5 B
18. Via Montezuma/Front St. 11.4 B 13.9 B
29. Margarita Rd./Moraga Rd. 13.6 B 12.7 B
32. Rancho Vista Rd./Margarita Rd. 17.0 C 17.1 C
36. Pauba Rd./Ynez Rd. 14.4 B 16.5 C
October 3, 1991
84
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 10
UNSIGNAUZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
(I-Way and 2-Way Stop Controlled)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Conflicting Approx. Vehicles Approx. Vehicles
Movement
LOS Affected LOS Affected
9. Rancho California Rd. EB Left A 1 A 8
WB Left A 114 A 146
------------ ----------------- -------- ---------
Business Park Dr. NB Left C 3 C 17
NBT&R A 74 A 113
SB Left C 11 D 65
SB T & R A 11 A 7
17. Jefferson Ave. NB Left A 53 A 57
------------ ----------------- -- -- -- -- --- -- ----
Overland Dr. EB Left 0 26 F 92
EB Right A 42 A 72
21. SR-79 WB Left A 278 A 189
------------ ---------- - ------ ---- -------------
1-15 SB Ramps SB Left F 199 F 275
SB T & R A 75 A 49
22. SR-79 EB Left A 22 A 66
------------ ----------------- -----------------
1-15 NB Ramps NB Left E 61 E 51
NBT&R A 79 A 147
24. SR-79 EB Left A 37 A 69
WB Left A 3 A 7
------------ ----------------- ------------------
La paz St. NB Left E 43 E 24
NBT&R B 17 C 8
SB Left 0 22 E 50
SB T & R A 53 B 61
25. Margarita Rd. NB Left A 4 A 12
------------ -- -- -- -- -- - -- - --- -- -- -- -- --- -- ----
Santiago Rd. EB Left A 7 A 12
EB Right A 4 A 8
26. Margarita Rd. SB Left A 1 A 1
NB Left A 9 A 4
------------ ----------------- -----------------
De Portola Rd. EB Left A 5 A 23
EB Thru A 1 A 1
EB Right A 5 A 6
WB Left A 1 A 1
WB Thru A 1 A 1
WB Right A 1 A 1
28. SR-79 EB Left A 113 A 36
WB Left A 11 A 3
------------ ------------------ ------------------
Margarita Rd. NB Left C 7 B 24
NB Thru B 57 A 20
NB Right A 9 A 4
SB Left C 44 C 62
SB T & R B 133 A 45
30. Margarita Rd. SB Left A 17 A 68
------------ ------------------ ------------------
La Serena Way WB Left A 39 E 230
WB Right A 273 A 71
33. Winchester Rd. SB Left A 52 B 100
------------ ----------------- ------------- ----
Nicolas Rd. WB Left 0 156 E 75
WB Right A 80 A 63
October 3, 1991
85
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 10
UNSIGNAUZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
(l.Wav and 2-Wal Ston Controlled)
Conflicting AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Movement Approx. Vehicles Approx. Vehicles
LOS Affected LOS Affected
35. Pala Rd. NB Left A 11 A 15
------------ ----------------- -----------------
Rainbow Canyon Rd. EB Left C 56 D 121
EB Right A 8 A 36
37. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. WB Left A 120 A 214
------------ ----------------- -----------------
1-15 SB Ramps SB Left B 110 F 156
SB T & R A 74 A 64
38. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EB Left A 36 A 116
------------ ----------------- ------ -- ----- ----
1-215 NB Ramps NBL&T&R A 74 E 368
39. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EB Left A 51 B 150
WB Left A 6 A 6
------------ ----------------- -----------------
Jackson Ave NBL&T&R C 17 E 6
SB L & T & R A 27 D 142
TABLE 11
3.WAY AND 4-WAY STOP CONTROL INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
Intersection Estimated LOS C PM Peak Hour Approximate
Capacity Volume Level of Sen'ice
14. Solana WaylYnez Rd. 1,250 Veh/Hr 1,106 Veh C (or Better)
20. Main St./Front St. 900 VehlHr 1,128 Veh D
27. SR-79/Pauba Rd. 1,300 Veh/Hr 1,470 Veh D
31. Pauba Rd./Margarita Rd. 1,110 Veh/Hr 516 Veh C (or Better)
October 3, 1991
86
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 12
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (lCU) ANALYSIS
Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU Approx. LOS ICU Approx. LOS
9. Rancho California Rd./
Business Park Drive (east) 24 A 34 A
14. Solana WayfYnez Rd. 41 A 36 A
17. Overland Dr./Jefferson Ave. 22 A 31 A
20. Main St./Front St. 27 A 47 A
21. Front St.lI-15 SB Ramps 43 A 64 B
22. SR-7911-15 NB Ramps 61 B 54 A
23. Santiago Rd./Front St. 26 A 49 A
24. SR-79/La Paz St. 55 A 64 B
25. Santiago Rd./Margarita Rd. 10 A 17 A
26. De Portola Rd./
Margari ta Rd. 18 A 11 A
27. SR-79/Pala Rd. 45 . A 42 A
28. SR-79/Margarita Rd. 28 A 25 A
30. La Serena Way/
Margarita Rd. 26 A 31 A
31. Pauba Rd./Margarita Rd. 5 A 18 A
33. Nicolas Rd./Winchester Rd. 40 A 49 A
35. Rainbow Canyon Rd./
Pala Rd. 30 A 33 A
37. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd./
1-215 SB Ramps 32 A 61 B
38. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd./
1-215 NB Ramps 38 A 80 C
39. Murrieta Hot Springs Rd./
Jackson Ave. 28 A 75 C
For example, Level of Service E conditions for 24 vehicles during the peak hour is not
as significant as LOS E for 230 vehicles. Generally, if a significant number of vehicles
at this type of an intersection are subjected to very long delays (LOS E or F), then
motorists will begin to make unsafe maneuvers which could result in accidents or major
disruptions to the heavier through traffic flows.
October 3, 1991
87
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The analysis results indicate that the following intersection have one or more traffic
movements which are currently operating at LOS E or F during peak periods:
· Jefferson Avenue/Overland Drive;
· State Route 79/1-15 SB Ramps;
· State Route 79/1-NB Ramps;
· State Route 791La paz Street;
· Margarita RoadlLa Serena Way;
· Winchester Road/Nicolas Road;
· Murrieta Hot Springs Road/l-15 SB Ramps; and
· Murrieta Hot Springs Road/l-15 NB Ramps.
Three-Way and Four-Way Stop Controlled Intersections - Based on the analysis findings
summarized in Table 11, all four intersections are currently operating at LOS D or better
during peak periods.
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis - The results of the leU analysis (in Table 12
indicate that if signalized, all of the currently unsignalized intersections would operate at
LOS e or better.
Signal Warrant Evaluation - A prelimina-ry signal warrant evaluation was performed for
selected unsignalized intersections which were assessed as having relatively poor traffic
operating conditions during peak periods. The Caltrans Peak Hour Volume Warrant
evaluation method was used to determine which intersections would likely need
signalization in the near future.
Based on this preliminary evaluation, the following ten intersections were found to satisfy
the peak hour volume warrant for signalization:
.
Jefferson Avenue/Overland Drive;
State Route 79/1-15 SB Ramps;
State Route 79/1-15 NB Ramps;
State Route 791La Paz Street;
State Route 79/Pala Road;
Margarita RoadlLa Serena Way;
Winchester Road/Nicolas Road;
Pala RoadlRainbow Canyon Road;
Murrieta Hot Springs Road/l-215 SB Ramps; and
Murrieta Hot Spring Road/l -1215 NB Ramps.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
These intersections are depicted in Figure 28.
3.3.2 Other 'fransportation Modes
Other transportation modes currently used in Temecula include public transit, bicycle, and
pedestrian. Equestrian travel is also used, but is primarily recreational in nature.
October 3, 1991
88
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 28 INTERSECI10N LOCATIONS
October 3, 1991
89
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Public Transit
Transit services has not been available in the Study Area until recently. In January of
1991 Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) initiated Route 28, a pilot program which provides
commuter oriented service between Temecula and Corona with stops in Murrieta and Lake
Elsinore. Current ridership is relatively low with an average of 19 rides per day. The
future of Route 28 will largely depend on the outcome of a recent random survey which
involved approximately 6,000 households in Temecula. This survey included questions
regarding trip origin and destination information, demographic information and the
likelihood of area residents using public transit. The results of this survey have not yet
been published.
Local transit service in the Study Area was initiated by RTA in June of 1991 with Route
23. Information on Route 23, including the route configuration and service timetable is
illustrated in Figure 29. Current ridership for Route 23 is estimated by RTA to be 35
riders per day. (Limited Servicet
Bicvcle and Pedestrian Modes
Although no formal bike routes currently exist within the Study Area, a preliminary bike
route plan is presently being drafted by the Community Services Department of the City.
The final plan will consist of a comprehensive system of designated bike routes including
painted bike lanes (along selected area streets) and dedicated bike paths. These bike
routes will essentially connect residential areas to recreation facilities, educational
institutions, and shopping/employment centers within the community. The City of
Temecula General Plan Study effort will assist in the refinement of this plan.
Pedestrian travel within the Study Area is very limited at the present time due to several
factors. These include:
· A general discontinuity in sidewalk improvements within the City;
· The relatively great distances which exist between most residential development
and area shopping and employment centers; and
· The very limited number of mixed use developments which are presently fully-
built out.
3.3.3 Current Transportation Modes
This section provides discussion of various transportation related plans which currently
have a significant influence on short and long-range transportation improvements within
the City of Temecula and its sphere of influence.
9
Limited Service - loop only once an hour.
October 3, 1991
90
Existing Conditions Report
m
0=
1;.0
g.~
f f .. :f~
o · ~:~....
o ~~~~ .. .~~
i1, ,.~... 0 · · ~ /;"#
Q -cP~""'.. ~"
::J .. ..
iir ....
~ ,"-
~ /~
~ ~2 ~~~
l/I .
,.. .l....
~.
-t
(1)
3
(1)
o
c:
-
Q)
3
.
-i
3'
CI
"tl
o
a
+.
:w:
~
o
Q
tT1
(")
eno
Oz
C~
~~
nO
tI1C
::j~
~o
~z
~~
tI1tJ
..
-f
h
If
~
#
Jill
~
.......u__
4-
f
· t
1(''''
If
~
if
Ij
(,A..UN-N=C;-oCD......'"
tU:HHHi ;; ;; ;; ;; ~HHl " -
"ll"ll"ll"ll"ll"ll~>~>~>. _
31:31:31:31:31:31: 31: 31: 31:
UI..c.aN-N::OCDCD......cn
f:i~~lii;;iiiii;;iiQiQi~
"ll"ll"ll"ll"ll"ll~~>~~~
31:31:31:31:31:31: 31:
UI..U~-N=DCOCD......Ol
~...:.II)II)NII)N~bi..
....................... N
~~~~l~~~~~~i:
UlUI..N-N::C;COCD..........
!!l8tH:H~~~~~td!J8
"ll"ll"ll"ll"tl"tl~>>>>i:
31:31:31:31:31:31: 31:31:31:31:
en UI .... . . . . . .
.. ~~ i : ! i I I !
200 I I I I : I :
"ll"tl"ll I I : I :
31: 31: 31: I ! i I ! i !
mc.n~N-N::OtDc>>CD.....
;ti~ai:H:iH:l!:l!:;;~ .
"ll"ll"ll"ll"ll"ll>>i:i:i:i:
31:31:3:31:3:3:31:31:
~ .~J
I: .:II
~ !
I =:J
L!..-!....J
~
~~~
~@~
::s ::r
ell
~~"
~tr1()
~ (1:.
~~~
....>~
~ 0
8 M)
Ii
I-
- g
OCII
.. II
-e-
. c
,...a.
"
OCll
1::C]
~
oft
.. ..
-eo
!!~
9i:
,,- -
!!~
:I ~
II -
"e,
00
.. II
":C:c
a:~=:=:3I: .:.
gNOa.~ i
1:888% !.
ii-CIl-<c,... .
::1.0.-< ·
- ~- ~ i: I
O~!!.lII i
& if ffi ii"
_0 Ii!
!Ji t
_:r 1
"'J:
ooll-
I! :r ~
If !
(1 - Q.
..- "
:l
..
i
Q.
lir
II
S[
8-
n
~
::o:l
;;!
~
~
;
..~
~
~~
~~
~ I
~ I
"'
I>
. ~
i~
="0
::Ie:
lr"
~ 0;-
11
!ij'
. II
~2"
- "
~ ..
~i"
~~
ii
-ell
..a.
~:7
.. -
:a"
c!
sr-
--
s~
:> ..
_10
--
II :>
~ -
- ~
!" ..
r-
Ul
~
'[3
~~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Riverside County General Plan
Prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula the improvement of the Rancho
California area roadway network was dictated by the Circulation Element of the Riverside
County General Plan. Over the years this plan has evolved from a relatively sparse
network of predominantly two and four-lane roadways of varying classification to a much
denser street network. The current County Circulation Element depicted in Figure 30,
presently includes a significant number of roadway segments which have been upgraded
to six lane cross sections. Additional freeway overcrossings have been designated at Date
Street and Apricot Road (Overland Drive). Also included in the Circulation Element, is
the designation of Winchester Road and the future Butterfield Road corridor as restricted
access facilities.
Since the incorporation of the City of Temecula, and until such time that the City adopts
its' own General Plan Circulation Element, the Riverside County Circulation Element
remains as the predominant guideline for long-range roadway system planning.
Short-Range Transnortation Imnrovement Plans
At the present time there are a number of on going transportation improvement projects
which are underway or tentatively programmed within the City of Temecula and its sphere
of influence.
Some of these projects were initiated by Riverside County prior to the incorporation of
Temecula. others are either underway or tentatively programmed by the City of
Temecula. The following sections provide a brief overview of these transportation
improvement projects. A more detailed description of these transportation improvements
projects will be prepared and presented in a later report.
Assessment District 161 (A.D. 161) - Was initiated by Riverside County in the late 1980's
and addressed transportation improvements and other infrastructure needs in the
. Winchester Road corridor. Transportation improvements included in the Winchester
Assessment District (A.D. 161) are in various stages of completion. The section of
Winchester Road between 1-15 and Margarita Road was recently widened to six lanes as
part of the first phase of construction. The construction of Margarita Road as a four lane
Arterial is currently underway between Winchester Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
The next phase will soon be underway and will extend the six-lane section north to
Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Ultimately, A.D. 161 improvements will result in the
continuation of the six lane Winchester Road widening north to Auld Road.
Assessment District 159 (A.D. 159) - Also initiated by Riverside County in the late
1980's was formed to fund a program of transportation and other infrastructure
improvements in the State Route 79 (south) corridor. Roadway improvements which are
being funded by Rancho Villages Assessment District (A.D. 159) include the widening
of State Route 79 between 1-15 and Butterfield Stage Road and the improvement of
significant portions of lower Margarita Road and lower Butterfield Stage Road.
October 3, 1991
92
Existing Conditions Report
()()
~o
()e
~~
00
z~
~~
3:~
tI1(/)
~s
tI1
,
\
I
· i I.
\. I
# I
.(.. . ('A.:I'#,I
.. " . 'r.-....
I~' \\ I iJ.i:{
# 't ~ I' ,,' I
i'~" · I oI;;-"','~ I -.. I
.__ ........~' , ,...... I ___oJ
~ " I' II --..---.'
. ,/ if 1f ,
. . ~' 1/ ~. ,
( . I ,,~
-~ '...............
" \ r.
. ' I · ~
~ ~;(/\.l ). ,
. f · r .,
;V \ '\.. .- .....
, .-r /. -
" 7"~ .",-
rl ' ·
!" / i.I
,/ /i
"
, (;
, \ \ .
/. \. P
: ~, #
_).,1' ....-=-\\ .J~
r,\: ,t'-. #' \ f
' t ,:\"~). "
I .... -------.. \\'\~ ~ .~
,A, ,~~ ~
---"":' '.G '"ft
--- 'c, f 'Ir...,
- -.. ~.
: 'e: ,.
: 'I'" ,
' '... .
\~ \.. .
'.... ./ ..
,-., ._~ r~.L
' ".1 Y
~... ., ..!to"
......:..... ~ ./
......~ ",....V .,
\..:~.:....I~ '
;.i ~.
'. ..'
./'
.^,-/
I
.
I
,
.
..
.
.
..
-
:
.
i
I
!I
!
i
"'i""
e~i
=j!
i:.l:
....t
i~ i.. ~
.. '"
.. 0
l!!;e
!u
~5"
:lU
~~=
Ui
;j~"
..~~
Z....
~~iI
~:8
~:II..
a""n
"~2
I...z
:ii~
,.~.
i',.=
~l'io
UIIiI'lill
:J ~ =!~ s
I! I ~I
i
..
iU~ii'lI
i
I
c
;
e
;;l
1:;11
. ..
:: I
.. iil
8 ~~~~~~~~~~ I
-1II.!:~"lI!.rl!: c
;: ;5~X...~Iii_...1i g
..
l.iji",.,:,,;~~;; 0
1............-- ·
.......-. ~-..
*t:UaUht
~
...
o
:I
..
..
~
. .. I
H~~~ I
un! a
;;;:;. e
uu;;;
~
,
~l
~
<1--
Yo
j:.
I
VISI
;ie;;
fill
1811
-t'l
Ili~
-I!
Iii
h.
IU
III
Iii
.Ii
Iii
51.
I=!
os~
iU
il
~~~
~tr1t:r
~~"
~tr1()
~(J:.
~e'<
....>~
~ 0
8 ~
'[3
l~f
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Rancho CalifornialI-lS Interchange Improvements - This project, which will soon go out
to construction bid, will involve widening of the interchange off-ramps signalization of
the interchange ramp intersections, and travel lane and median work along Rancho
California Road between Front Street and Ynez Road.
City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program (1992-96) - This city-wide program,
which is currently in draft fonn, includes significant transportation improvements over the
next five years. A partial listing of these tentative improvements include:
· Butterfield Stage Road extension from La Serena Way to Nicolas Road;
· Diaz Road extension from Winchester Road to Cherry Street (funded by A.D. 155);
· Ynez Road corridor improvements;
· Margarita Road interim extension from Winchester Road south to current tenninus at
General Kearny Road;
· Calle Chapos improvement between Nicolas Road and Walcott Road;
· Overland Drive overcrossing of 1-15;
· Pala Road Bridge at Temecula River;
· Rancho California Road interchange loop ramp;
· Rancho California Road widening between Lyndie Lane and Comic Drive;
· Winchester Road interchange improvements;
· Ynez Road extension to Date Street; and
· Date Street overcrossing of 1-15.
October 3, 1991
94
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
3.4 Land Use
3.4.1 Setting
The City of Temecula is located in the southwestern comer of Riverside County,
approximately five miles from the San Diego County line. The City is approximately 85
miles southeast of the City of Los Angeles, 60 miles north of the City of San Diego and
40 miles south of the City of Riverside. Cities within an hours drive of Temecula include
Escondido, Hemet, Oceanside, Vista, Carlsbad, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Moreno
Valley.
Temecula encompasses 26 square miles, or 16,765 acres and is bounded on three sides
by unincorporated Riverside County. Wine Country and Vail Lake areas are located east
of Temecula and Lake Skinner is just north and outside of the Sphere of Influence area.
The southern City limit adjoins the community of Rainbow Canyon. Further south is the
Pechanga Indian Reservation. The newly incorporated City of Murrieta adjoins the
Temecula's northwestern boundary.
Located in the Temecula Valley, the City is surrounded by rolling foothills and mountains.
The Santa Ana Mountains to the are directly west of the City and the Santa Margarita and
Agua Tibia Ranges are located south. The San Jacinto Mountains lie approximately 30
mile east of the City.
Temecula is linked to major metropolitan areas and transportation corridors in Southern
California by the Interstate 15 and State Route 79 freeways. The 1-15 traverses the
western portion of the City in a northwest-southerly direction, south of its juncture with
Interstate 215. State Route 79 is located in the northern and southern portions of the City.
3.4.2 Existing Land Uses
The City of Temecula (Land Use Inventorv) is a report prepared for the City in 1990 and
indicates that 7,030 acres, or 41.9 percent, of the City's total area is currently
developed.10 The report aggregates land uses into four categories with a total of eight
land use designations as follows:
Residential
· Single-Family
· Multi-Family
Commercial
· Retail
· Mixed-Use
· Office
Industrial
· Ught
· Manufacturing
Civic/Institutional
· Schools, Parks, Churches and
Public Facilities.
10
The City of Temecula Land Use Inventorv, October 1990, prepared by the Lightfoot Planning Group.
October 3, 1991
95
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECUIA
General Plan Program
Residential development is the predominant land use in the Study Area. The relative
affordability of housing in the Study Area compared to Los Angeles, Orange and San
Diego counties is a major factor in the City's rapid growth. Between 1980 and 1989, the
population of the City increased 248 percent.
As of January 1, 1990, there were 10,659 dwelling units. The majority of these units are
located east of Interstate 15. Older single-family units, as well as newer multi-family
units, are found south of Rancho California Road and west of Interstate 15.
Commercial uses are dispersed throughout the City, with the largest concentration found
along Front Street/Jefferson Avenue and Rancho California Road. New commercial
development is found along Ynez Road. Industrial and office uses are generally located
west of Interstate 15 and north of Rancho California Road, with some development in the
southwestern portion of the City. New office commercial development is occurring in the
northern portions of the City boundaries.
The following table summarizes existing land use by acreage in the Study Area. A
corresponding Existing Land Use Map is shown as Figure 31.
(Existing land use information to be provided based on revisions to Lightfoot data and
new aerial photos.)
I TABLE 13 I
EXISTING LAND USE
October, 1990
I Land Use I Acreage I Percent of Total I
City Area
:1 Residential
'r Single-family Residcnllal
. Mulli-Famil\' Residential
, .
il Commercial
I. Retail
jl
: ~ixed-L:sc
i. Office
I, Industrial
II Light
! Manufacturing
Civlc.:1 nsti tUllonal
Schools. Parks. Churches. & !>uhltc
II Facilities
I Total
::
II
October 3, 1991
96
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
FIGURE 31 EXISTING LAND USE MAP
October 3, 1991
97
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The Land Use Inventory also divides the City into quadrants to provide greater detail of
land use characteristics and patterns.11 Interstate 15 separates the east and west
quadrants and Rancho California Road separates the north and south quadrants. The
acreage and percent of total City area for each of the land uses by quadrant is presented
in the Table 14.
3.4.3 Vacant Land Inventory
The amount of vacant land provides an indication of the future build-out capacity. Vacant
lands are defined as lands without structural development. However, some of these lands
have entitlement and are proceeding with development. The Study Area has _ percent
or _ acres of vacant land as of October, 1990. Table 15 below summarizes the amount
of vacant land by type. [Table to be compiled based on revisions to Lightfoot data and
new aerial photo.]
A Vacant Lands Map is shown in Figure 32. Vacant lands are grouped into four
categories: Vacant, Graded, Open SpacelRecreational and Agricultural Lands. The Vacant
Lands category includes land in an unimproved and natural condition. The Graded Lands
category includes sites not under construction, but are most or entirely graded. The Open
SpacelRecreational Lands category includes private and public recreational uses.
Agricultural Lands include Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Grazing
Land and other types of agricultural lands as defined by the California Department of
Agriculture.
As shown in the Vacant Lands Map, a large area of vacant land is found in the
southeastern portion of the City boundaries. Smaller vacant land areas are evidenced
along the City property line. Vacant land is also located in residential areas, in the
northern portion of the City; these areas represent infill development opportunities.
[Discussion of Vacant Lands in Sphere to be provided.]
3.4.4 Entitlements to Use
TO BE PROVIDED
[Discussion of large-scale approved projects that are not yet built - awaiting Meyers
Group aerial and county specific plan information.]
[Analysis of remaining vacant land in City and sphere area that do not have entitlements
to use.]
11
This excludes the Sphere of Influence area.
October 3, 1991
98
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
FIGURE 32 VACANT LANDS MAP
October 3, 1991
99
Existing Conditions Report
UlTJ.J.aO.Jd UTJld
ITJ.J.3U3D
XlIO.LN3ANI 3~VIDl3Y 3S0 ONVl ~NLLSIX3
tl 3'1HY.L
V'lOJ3W3.L dO A.LIJ
AlD IUlO.L
JO lU3;).J3d
p3dol3A30
lU3;J.J3d
IBlO.L
lUB.Jpenl)
lsu3qlnos
luu.Jpunl)
lS3A.\qlnos
luu.Jpenl)
lSB3q}.lON
lUB.Jpunl)
lS3A.\q}.lON
::I:i:i~:~::.:ii-lil:!!i:i:i:!:!::!:-::::;::i!::I:!!l!:j::I!I~:I:!:j:I![I!!!:ili
SI'lICH
...
till PH llllm~
HplSnpU I 1113" I
....---..-. .......-..,
IU~ISnpul
.--.. .. .,.
;}SCl P;}X!~
.. .. .-
;};)!J.I( )
.. n. -.-
I! 1~1 ;}~I
,......---.......-......-...
Inp.13WWO:>
-- "...
:l10H1SUI!:J!^D
..............--....--....,
~JnJ!lSUIf.>!A!a
''''-
AHmed mow
AHmed :l13u!S
,..-.........-....-..
IU!Juap!~H
3S0 pUB"]
,. [=....-
.....--..... --..
---[ ..,.,-- C..-- I
--_. ......--........- -..-----.-....
Of
...
..
=_~L
.,.
. -
--"."...
..
i
.-
....
1I3.LN3:J DNINNVIL
d
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 15 I
VACANT LANDS ACREAGE
Quadrant
Designation Northwest I Northeast I Southeast I Southwest I Total
II
:1
II Residential
8-16 du..ac
5-8 dU/ac
2- du/ac
2-4 du/ac
3 du/ac
1-2 du/ac
2.5 ac min
Mountain
:~ Specifie PfOl1lS
!i #117 Pala Vii:agc
:,
#164 Roripaugh Estates
#180 Rancho Highlands
#199 Margarita Village
#213 Winchester Properties
#219 Vail Meadows
Total Specific Plans
i Commercial
. Commercial
'I Ofl:cc CommcrcllIi
Rcson Commcrc:al I
it Total Commercial Designation
; ladustrial
,I Ugh! Induslrial
Rcsmclcc Lighl
Commercial
TotallndustriaJ
Recreational
Comr.1unJlY Park
" To:.!l
1/
-
II
Totlll \'llcant l..and
October 3, 1991
101
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
3.5 Human Health Hazards
3.5.1 Natural Hazards
Flood Hazards
As part of the National Flood Insurance Program, floodplain studies have been performed
for various communities in Riverside County, including the City of Temecula. In order
to provide a national standard without regional preferences, the one-hundred year flood
has been adopted by the Federal Insurance Administration as the basis for floodplain
management procedures. The five-hundred year flood is utilized to indicate areas of
additional risk within a community. The results of these studies are presented in the form
of a floodplain boundary maps and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). These maps
identify 100- and 5oo-year flood boundaries, areas of 1oo-year flood hazard, actuarial
insurance rate zones, base flood elevations and, in some cases, limits of the 100-year
floodway.
Figure 33 shows the portion of the FIRM map index for Riverside County covering the
City of Temecula. The map index provides a guide to more detailed information on
floodplain and floodway limits. A brief description of the areas of potential flooding and
the adjacent watercourses is provided in the following table.
Additional panel numbers listed in Figure 33 have not been provided because the area
affected lies within a zone of minimal flooding, Zone C.
Review of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps shows there are areas of existing development
within 100-year flood zone which can be considered hazardous. Areas of 100- and 500.
year flooding exist adjacent to Murrieta Creek from Cherry Avenue easterly to the Santa
Margarita River, Santa Gertrudis Creek from Murrieta Creek to the San Diego Aqueduct
and Temecula Creek from Murrieta Creek approximately the San Diego Aqueduct.
Within these areas, potential for flood damage exists mainly along Murrieta Creek from
Cherry Avenue to approximately one-half mile easterly of First Street. Should an event
of loo-year, or greater, magnitude occur along Murrieta Creek there is potential for severe
flood damage to existing commercial, industrial and retail development from Diaz Road
and Pujoi Street on the south to Front Street on the North.
October 3, 1991
102
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 33 FLOODPLAIN MAP
October 3, 1991
103
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 16
CITY OF TEMECULA
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS
I Panel Number I Description I
060245 2745 B Cities of Temecula and Murrieta, including Murrieta Creek
(2745 of 3600) and Santa Gertrudis Creek
060245 2765 A City of Temecula, County of Riverside unincorporated areas
(2765 of 3600) and Santa Gertrudis Creek
060246 3335 C City of Temecula, County of Riverside unincorporated areas,
(3335 of 3600) including Murrieta Creek, Temecula Creek and Santa
Margarita River
060245 3355 A City of Temecula, including Temecula Creek
(3355 of 3600)
Seismic Hazards
As mentioned in Geologic Hazards (Section 2.5.3, there are two fault zones within the
Study Area: the Elsinore Fault Zone and the Agua Caliente Fault Zone.
Elsinore Fault Zone - The Elsinore Fault Zone is divided into three principal northwest-
trending faults, the Wildomar Fault Zone, the Willard Fault Zone, and the Murrieta Hot
Springs Fault Zone. The Elsinore Fault is predominant and youthful structural boundary
that separates the Perris Block along its eastern side from the Santa Ana Mountains along
its western side. The term Elsinore trough is commonly used to describe the fault
controlled graben valley between Corona and Wolf Valley. Geologic mapping indicates
that the eastern side of the Elsinore trough (Wildomar Fault Zone) is composed principally
of right-stepping, strike-slip faults that have a west-dipping normal component, whereas
the western side (Willard Fault Zone) is composed of a series of east-dipping, steeply
inclined faults. Figure 7 illustrates the location of the Elsinore Fault Zone.
The Willard Fault Zone - Most individual faults of the Willard Fault Zone can be
traced for only a kilometer or two and many for less than a few hundred meters.
The faults have a complex discontinuous relationship to one another and only as
a group form a through-going zone. The Willard Fault Zone is not classified as
active by either the State or County and no evidence of recency has been
encountered.
The Murrieta Hot Sprinl!s Fault Zone - has been mapped as being nearly
continuous from the southeast portion of Murrieta to Murrieta Hot Springs. This
fault is not currently classified as an active fault by State or local agencies.
However, recent evidence of Holocene Age activity has been recognized by State
and local agencies as active at a future date.
October 3, 1991
104
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The Wildomar Fault Zone - is a northwest-striking, west-dipping, high-angle
nonnal fault. This fault zone is presently included within the Alquist-Priolo
Special Studies Zone. The main trace of the Wildomar Fault, despite greater
micro-seismicity, is assumed to have a recurrence interval of 300-450 years.
The Alquist-Priolo Zone - The Elsinore Fault Zone has been designated as an
Alquist-Priolo Zone, therefore demonstrating its potential risk to development.
Alquist-Priolo zones were created to establish additions in an attempt to aid cities,
counties and State agencies with decision-making for developments adjacent to
potential significant faults.
Specific criteria required by these zones is as follows:
A No structure for human occupancy, public or private, shall be permitted to be
placed across the trace of an active fault. Furthennore, the area within fifty (50)
feet of an active fault shall be assumed to be underlain by active branches of that
fault unless and until proven otherwise by an appropriate geologic investigation
and submission of a report by a geologist registered in the State of California.
This 50-foot standard is intended to represent minimum criteria only for all
structures. It is the opinion of the Board that certain essential or critical
structures, such as high-rise buildings, hospitals, and schools should be subject to
more restrictive criteria at the discretion of cities and counties.
B. Application for a development pennit for any project (as defined in Section
2621.6) within a special studies zone shall be accompanied by a geologic report
prepared by a geologist registered in the State of California, and directed to the
problem of potential surface fault displacement through the project site, unless
such report is waived pursuant to Section 2623.
C. One (1) copy of all such geologic reports shall be filled with the State Geologist
by the public body having jurisdiction within thirty days following acceptance by
the approving jurisdiction. The State Geologist shall place such reports on open
file.
D. A geologist registered in the State of California, within or retained by each City
or county, must evaluate the geologic reports required herein and advise the body
having jurisdiction and authority.
E. Cities and counties may establish policies and criteria which are more restrictive
than those established herein. In particular, the Board believes that
comprehensive geologic and engineering studies should be required for any
"critical" or "essential" structure as previously defined whether or not it is located
with a special studies zone.
F. In accordance with Section 2625 of the Public Resources Code, each applicant for
approval of a project within a delineated special studies zone may be charged a
reasonable fee by the City or County having jurisdiction over the project.
October 3, 1991
105
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
G. As used herein, the following definitions apply:
1. A "project" includes any structure for human accompany or new real
estate development as defined under Section 2621.6 of the Public
Resources Code.
2. A "structure for human occupancy" is one that is regularly, habitually, or
primarily occupied humans; excluding therefrom freeways, roadways,
bridges, railways, airport runways, and tunnels. The excluded
transportation structures should be sited and designed with due
consideration to the hazard of surface faulting. Mobile homes, whose
body width exceed eight 98) feet, are considered as structures for human
occupancy.
3. A "new real estate development" is defined as any new development of
real property which contemplates the eventual construction of "structures
for human occupancy."
Approximately 60 known earthquakes have occurred along the Elsinore fault and the
Wildomar Fault zone is felt to have the greatest potential for a significant eventY
However, only one earthquake has been recorded with a magnitude greater than magnitude
4.5. A magnitude 6.0 event was recorded in 1910, located along the southwest portion
of the faultY If an event was to occur, it is anticipated to have a magnitude no greater
than 6.0 on the Richter Scale.
According to. the Riverside County Hazards and Resources Element, the entire Study Area
is located within Distance Zone II. As expected from a Zone II, shaking will vary from
moderate on bedrock and depth alluvium to moderate to intense on thinner alluvium.
Alrua-Caliente Fault Zone
The Agua Caliente Fault Zone is a series of subparallel, northwest trending faults over 56
miles in extent. One strand extends to Murrieta Hot Springs at the northwest, and several
fault strands extend into San Diego County, towards the Anza Burrego Desert. In the
Study Area, the fault zone is composed of several short northeast trending fault strands
as well as northwest trending fault strands. The fault zone wa zoned as potentially active
by Riverside County. Figure 7 shows the location of the fault zones in the Study Area.
12
Riverside County, Seismic Safety and Safety General Plan Elements Technical Report, Volume I,
1976.
13 California Division of Mines and Geology, Recency and character of Faulting along the Elsinore Fault
Zone in Southern Riverside County, California, Special Report 131, 1977.
October 3, 1991
106
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
3.5.2 Hazardous Waste
Hazardous waste management is one of the major environmental issues facing society
today. The lack of hazardous waste disposal facilities, laws preventing disposal into
landfills, and the long term negative effects on public health and the environment have
affected the need for a comprehensive, efficient plan to manage hazardous waste. As
such, Riverside County has prepared a County Hazardous Waste Management Plan.
Passage of the Tanner Bill (Chapter 1504 of the Statutes of 1986) prompted the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors in 1987 to pass a resolution (Resolution 87-78) calling for
the preparation of the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (1987). The
county-wide plan provides for a comprehensive system of hazardous waste management.
The Tanner legislation stipulates that the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan
(CHWMP) include the following:
· An analysis of the hazardous waste stream generated in the County;
· A description of existing hazardous waste facilities and their current
capacity;
· An analysis of the potential for reducing the volume and hazard of the
waste at the source of generation;
· A consideration of the need to manage hazardous waste produced by
businesses and households;
· A determination of the need for additional hazardous waste facilities;
· The identification of existing facilities that can be expanded and areas
where the siting of new facilities may occur; and
· A statement of goals, objectives, and policies for the siting of hazardous
waste facilities and the management of wastes through the year 2000, and
a schedule for plan implementation.
In addition State legislation requires local jurisdictions to incorporate provisions of the
CHWMP into their local plans and processes. The City of Temecula is required to do one
of the following:
1) Adopt a City Hazardous Waste Management Plan containing all of the required
elements [per California Health and Safety Code, Section 25135.1(d)] which shall
be consistent with the approved County Hazardous Waste Management Plan.
2) Incorporate applicable portions of the approved County Plan, by reference, into
the City's General Plan.
3) Enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable zoning, subdivision,
conditional use permits, and variance decisions are consistent with the portions
of the approved County Plan which identify general areas or citing criteria for
hazardous waste facilities.
In addition to the aforementioned issue of incorporating provisions of the County HWMP
into the City's plan and processes, this hazardous waste management study addresses the
existing hazardous waste management conditions for the Study Area. Hazardous waste
October 3, 1991
107
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
issues are addressed on both local and regional levels to inform the City of the existing
conditions and management activities. Specific issues covered in this report include the
following14:
· Known hazardous waste sites in the City;
· Hazardous waste transportation routes; and
· Household hazardous waste.
Known Hazardous Waste Sites in the City
There are State and federal laws (Community-Right-to-Know laws) which require
disclosure and tracking of hazardous wastes and emergency incident responses from
various levels of government as well as industries which generate hazardous wastes.
Hazardous Waste Transportation Routes
Large amounts of hazardous materials are transported over California's highways, railways
and waterways each day. Hazardous waste comprises a very small amount of this material.
Most is a variety of virgin chemical materials used in industry and agriculture.
There are federal and State laws and regulations in place that govern the transport of
hazardous waste and include, for example, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
(HMTA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which are federal
laws, and the California Hazardous Waste Control Law (HWCL) and Hazardous Waste
Haulers Act (HWHA).
Household Hazardous Waste
Household hazardous materials pose serious health issues for people who improperly use
or dispose of household hazardous waste. For example, thousands of people are injured
each year due to improper use or disposal of household hazardous materials; sanitation
workers are injured by fumes, spills and explosions; and dangerous levels of hazardous
volatile components may be emitted into the air.
In addition, serious environmental problems occur when household hazardous materials
are disposed of in sanitary landfills. Hazardous substances can leach through the soil and
contaminate groundwater.
Nearly all residents have some type of hazardous material in the home. Examples include
used motor oil, old paints, cleaners, aerosols, and pesticides. Only in the past few years
has there been a reasonable alternative to sanitary landfill disposal of these household
hazardous materials.
14
Information specific to the Study Area is being acquired and will be included at a later date.
October 3, 1991
108
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 34 ADDITIONAL PANEL NUMBERS
October 3, 1991
109
Existing Conditions Report
CHAPTER FOUR
Socio-Economic Environment
CITY OF TEMECUIA
General Plan Program
Chapter Four
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENTAL
4.1 Population and Housing Characteristics
The following section focuses on existing demographic conditions within the City of
Temecula. Where appropriate, 1990 Census Data for the County of Riverside has been
incorporated to provide a context for evaluating the City in terms of current population
and housing patterns. It should be noted that Census Data referenced in the following
discussion relates only to the City of Temecula and does not address the Study Area.
However, several independent studies are referenced in the discussion that address
population and employment trends in the entire Temecula Valley region.
The City of Temecula is one of 24 cities located in Riverside County. The City has
experienced rapid growth in recent years. The affordability of the Temecula Valley
relative to surrounding Orange, Los Angeles and San Diego counties has been an
important factor in the City's dramatic growth. According to the Community Economic
Profile. prepared by the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, the population of the
City increased an estimated 248 percent between 1980 and 1989. As of 1990, the
population in Temecula was 27,099 persons.
The following table provides a summary of selected demographic indicators for the City
of Temecula in comparison to Riverside County.
As shown in the following table, the City of Temecula is comprised of households that
are larger on average than the County, 2.97 compared with 2.85. Average family size,
however, is slightly smaller in Temecula at 3.28 compared with the County size of 3.30.
In terms of ethnic composition, the City does not reflect the ethnic diversity of Riverside
County as a whole; the majority of the City's population is white.
Figure 35 shows a comparative distribution of population by age group for the City and
County. Temecula has a younger population than Riverside County with fewer residents
in the 60 and over age group (less than 10%).
October 3, 1991
110
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 17
SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPIDC CHARACTERISTICS
Indicator
I Population
Bthnicitv
City of Temecula
27,0991
Riverside County
1,170,4131
..
;,
I' . I
White 91% 76.4%
AsianJPacific 3% 3.6%
Islander
Black 1% 5.4%
Other 5% 14.6
Persons of Hispanic Origin 14% 26%
I Gender !I
"
!I
Female
~ale
Persons per Household
Persons per Family
Source: 1990 CeDsus
49.1%1
50.9~
2.97
50. ()C". !I
I
50.00(; 'i
2.85
3.30jl
II
,
3.28,
October 3, 1991
111
Existing Conditions Report
d'fJ!S.J;JI1TH
HI
11ln;);JW;J .L
-
sdnL. J ;)~V
6S-Sf tf-61 81-9
a_..._
- -
SUO!lnqplS!U agV aA!llURdmo:)
Sf a.l~M
J;)^O 1s> 09
S-O
%Of
%SZ
%OZ
~
~
..,
(")
~
!
(JQ
~
%S"1 S,
~
Q
~
=
-
~
ct.
Q
=
%01
%S"
%0
CITY OF TEMECUIA
General Plan Program
4.2 Housing Characteristics
4.2.1 Income
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), provides median income
estimates for the 1991 Fiscal Year by Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA). The median
income for the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA, which includes the City of Temecula is
$36,000. In contrast, the median income for the State of California is estimated at
$42,700.
4.2.2 Overcrowding
Overcrowding is defined as 1.01 or more persons per room, and extreme overcrowding
is defined as more than 1.5 persons per room. Data on overcrowding, however is not
delineated by type of household or hous.ehold income. Furthermore, overcrowding must
be evaluated in terms of other factors such as cultural expectations, size of rooms,
availability and type of common areas or open space, and the age and relationship of
persons in the units.
The following table summarizes the number of persons per room in the City and is
suggestive of the incidence of overcrowding in Temecula.
I TABLE 18 I
OVERCROWDED HOUSEHOLDS
Number of Rental Units Owner Units Total Units
Persons per Room
I 1.1 to 1.5 I :: I :: I 274 I
1.51 or more 164
I Total I 3211 1171 4381
I Source: 1990 Census. I
4.2.3 Housing Type and Tenure
Housin2 Stock
As of January 1, 1990, a total of 10,659 units comprised the City's housing stock.
Approximately 70 percent of the housing stock are single-family units. Table 19 provides
a breakdown of the housing stock by unit type.
October 3, 1991
113
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 19 I
HOUSING STOCK AND TENURE
I Type I Total I Percent I
Single-family 7,314 68.6
2-4 units 269 2.5
5 or more units 2,779 26.1
Mobile Homes 275 2.6
Other 22 .2
Total 10,659 100
I Source: 1990 Census. I
Tenure
As indicated in Table 20, the majority of the households in Temecula (approximately 60
percent) are single-family homeowners. .
I TABLE 20 I
HOUSING UNITS BY TENURE
Owner-occupied Renter-Occupied Units
Number Percent Number Percent Total
Single-family 5,559 60.9 927 10.2 6,486
2-4 16 0.2 240 2.6 256
5 or more 18 0.2 2,103 23.0 2,121
Mobile Homes 208 2.3 41 0.4 249
Other 5 0.0 13 0.2 18
I Total I 5,8031 63.61 3,3241 36.41 9,130 I
. Percents are rounded to nearest tenth
Source: 1990 Census.
Vacancy Rate
The rate of vacancy is a measure of the availability of housing in a community. This rate
also provides an indication of how well the housing supply is meeting housing demand.
A low vacancy rate is indicative of a tight housing market and suggests that people may
have difficulty finding housing in their price range. Conversely, a high vacancy rate
suggests that there is an oversupply of housing, or that there is a large supply of
undesirable units. A vacancy rate of 5 percent generally indicates an adequate supply of
housing in a community.
October 3, 1991
114
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
According to the 1990 Census, the overall vacancy rate for Temecula was 14.3 percent.
The Riverside County vacancy rate is higher at 16.9 percent. These rates are significantly
higher than the vacancy rates of surrounding counties including Orange County at 5.5
percent and San Diego County at 7.8 percent.
Housinsz Costs
Housing costs in Temecula in terms of median value of owned units and contract rent are
greater than the rest of the County. As shown in Table 21, the median value of owned
units in Temecula exceeds that of the County by approximately 26 percent, and the
median contract rent exceeds the County by approximately 19 percent.
I TABLE 21 I
SUMMARY HOUSING COSTS
City of Riverside
Indicator Temecula County
Median Value - Owned Units $192,000 $139,100
Median Contract Rent $600 $502
Average Price Asked - For Sale Units $228,255 $186,247
Average Rent Asked - For Rent Units $639 $601
I Source: 1990 Census. I
Average prices for both detached and attached units in Temecula during the first quarter
of 1991 are provided in Table 22.
TABLE 22
AVERAGE SALES PRICE.
2-Bdrm I 3-Bdrm I 4-Bdrm I 5-Bdrm
Attached
$106,9501 $134,950 I n/al n/a
Detached -
$135,9141 $150,9421 $200,8161 $258,865
. Based on new projects with ten or more units.
Source: Residential Trends, June 1991.
Emplovment
The Community Economic Profile reports over 600 manufacturing and non-manufacturing
employers are located in the Temecula Valley. Within the Study Area, there are 100
manufacturing plants. Leading manufacturing compan~es are Hudson Oxygen Company
October 3, 1991
115
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
which produces medical equipment and employees 530 people, and Bianchi Leather
Products which employees 250 people. Non-manufacturing employers include service
oriented companies, such as restaurants, banks as well as supermarkets.
According to the Meyers Group, the majority of the members of the labor force are 25
to 34 years of age, and have either a bachelor degree or technical school education.
Table 23, based on a study by Economics Research Associates, is the occupation
distribution of Temecula Valley.
I TABLE 23 I
EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
I Employment 1Ype I Percent I
Agriculture/Mining 7.4
Construction 12.6
Manufacturing 19.9
Transportation 2.3
CommunicationslPublic Utilities 3.1
Wholesale Trade 3.6
Retail Trade 15.1
Finance/lnsurancelReal Estate 7.3
Services 24.4
Public Administration 4.3
Total 100.0
Source: Communitv Economic Profile. prepared by Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce
October 3, 1991
116
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
4.3 Economic and Employment Characteristics
4.3.1 The Temecula Employment Base
This section presents historic trends regarding employment in Temecula, in southwest
Riverside County and in the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA). The MSA includes the combined counties of Riverside and San Bernardino. The
analysis of these historic trends will serve three purposes:
· To provide a basis for future projections and assessment of economic
impacts
· To identify key sectors in the Temecula economic base
· To identify Temecula's role in the southwest Riverside County and
Riverside-San Bernardino MSA economies
This analysis focuses on private sector employment trends by industry, retail purchasing
power and retail sales. Additional economic information to be developed in the General
Plan analysis will include public sector employment analysis, industrial and commercial
development absorption trends and projections, and a retail analysis segmented by
shopping center types.
Overall Em{>lovment Growth
Table 24 presents private sector employment growth data for Temecula, based on ZIP
Code information from County Business Patterns from the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Since these data are for the Temecula zip code, they include some establishments outside
the City. However, the large majority of employment shown is within the City of
Temecula. As shown in Table 24, Temecula has experienced average annual employment
growth of 20.4 percent during the period from 1983 to 1989. By 1989, total employment
in Temecula was 10,956, over three times the employment of 3,593 in 1983.
This growth represents a very rapid expansion, especially when considered in the context
of the subregion of southwest Riverside County and the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA.
The comparative annual employment growth rates for the 1983-1989 period are shown
on the table following.
October 3, 1991
117
Existing Conditions Report
's:)!IS!11l1S l;llfnw ":lUI 's:lII1!:xlSS\' UllwJJOH 'H A;lIUI1IS ::r.>JROS
%t'Ol f9f'L %0'001 9S6'01 161'S f6S'[ l8lo.L
- - - - - -
% 1"6Z 080'Z %Z"PZ pS9'Z SE"8 pLS s:Y.>!i\J:lS
- - - - -
% 1"01 La %8'S ZE9 91E SSE :lll!lS:l !l!;)l ':Y.>ulUnSU! ':Y.>ueuH
- - - - -
%9'017 Loo'Z %O'IZ 9OE'Z zn'l 66Z ;)Pl!Jl I!l!l:l~
- - - - -
%6'17- (zpz) %E"9 S69 Z19 LE6 :lplUl :l!l!S;)I01fA\
- - - - -
%O'SE HI %Z"1 En 8P ZZ S:l!l!l!ln 'uo!ll!:)!Unwwoo 'uo!ll!llodsul!J.L
- - - - -
%E'61 1788'1 %E"9Z Sgg'Z 8PS'1 100'1 8u!JI1t:ll!Jnul!W
- - - - -
%8'SS pZp'l %0'171 U:S'1 LES LOl UO!l:lnJlSUOJ
- - - - -
%E'17 ~ % 1"0 6 SI L 8u!U!W
%8'171- = _' 'MIO'l ___ ~.~~ ~ ..!..(?Z _ __ S:lU~II<;~ \"~:)J()J ~~II1II~l.;.IUft\:,
:::::::::::::::.:.:,:.:.:-:.:..... UO!!i!^!(J .(Jlmpul
=w p:m_w . - - ..- . . --=:J~ - [n_
6861-[861 6861-[861 6861
;)l8lI qlMO.I~ qlMO.I~ lU;)W.\Oldw3 6861 9861 f861
lunuuy lU;)W.\Oldw3 18l0.L
;}~8.I;)AV l8lo.L JO lU;};).I;)d S;);}.\OldlD3 JO .I;)QwnN
6861-(861 :SONIDI.L .LN:ilWA.Or:IdW:illIO.LJ:ilS aLVAmd
VIDIV VIfl3:i1WaL
n WUW.L
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 25
COMPARATIVE ANNUAL GROWTII RATES
PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT
1983-1989
Temecula ............................................... 20.8%
Southwest Riverside County .................................. 12.9%
Riverside-San Bernardino MSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.8%
While all employment growth rates would be considered very rapid, Temecula is clearly
a leader in the subregion and metropolitan area. The following discussion identifies those
industry divisions which led Temecula's growth.
Growth by Industry Division
Growth Rates. Construction was the fastest growing industry during the six year period,
averaging over 55 percent annual growth in employment. Retail trade, at 40.6 percent
annual growth, was the second fastest growing industry. Services and manufacturing,
showing annual growth rates of 29.1 percent and 19.3 percent respectively, were the other
rapidly expanding industries in Temecula.
Absolute Job Growth. In terms of absolute growth in numbers of employees, the service
industry was the leader, with 2,080 new jobs created between 1983 and 1989, followed
by retail trade, with 2,007 jobs created during the same period. These two industries
represent about 55 percent of the total employment growth in Temecula. Construction,
with 1,424 new jobs, and manufacturing, with 1,884 new jobs, together represent about
45 percent of total job growth.
Emplovment Base in 1989. By 1989, 26.3 percent of all private sector jobs were in
manufacturing, 24.2 percent were in services, 21.0 percent were in retail trade, and 14.0
percent were in construction. Together, these four industries accounted for about 85.5
percent of all private sector jobs in Temecula in 1989.
Observations Re2ardin2 Temecula Emplovment Growth Trends
The construction growth can be viewed as occurring primarily in response to the rapid
development in the area. As the area becomes more developed, construction will probably
decline in relative importance. Similarly, the growth in retail trade can be viewed as
occurring primarily in response to housing growth.
It is in the growth of manufacturing and services that the City's emerging key industries
may be found. In manufacturing, the expansion from 1983 to 1986 was about 550 jobs.
From 1986 to 1989, manufacturing jobs in the City increased by over 1,300 jobs. In
services, employment expanded by about 250 jobs over the 1983 to 1986 period, with
growth expanding dramatically by over 1,700 jobs during the 1986-1989 period.
October 3, 1991
119
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Employment growth has been relatively modest in the industry divisions of finance,
insurance and real estate, (referred to as FIRE); and transportation, communication and
utilities. Employment has actually declined in wholesale trade. Finally, as the area has
become more urbanized, agricultural employment declined from 291 to 111.
The foregoing employment trends provide indicators of key sectors in the Temecula
economy. In regional economic analysis, employment is often grouped into basic and
local. serving categories. Basic employment is that which serves markets outside the area,
while local serving employment serves local demand. The growth of basic employment
is viewed as providing the major impetus for economic development in an area.
Generally, basic employment is found in the following sectors:
· Agriculture and mining
· Manufacturing
· Long distance transportation15
· Wholesale trade of durable goods
· Business and professional services
The above analysis of data by industry division has shown particular strength in the
Temecula economy for manufacturing and services.
To help identify key basic industries, the following sections discuss more detailed trends
within the manufacturing and services industry divisions.
The Composition of ManufacturinS! Growth
Table 26 shows the composition of manufacturing growth in Temecula by three broad
categories. Machinery, electronics and instruments, including the activities known as
high-technology manufacturing, accounted for the large majority of manufacturing
employment growth in Temecula over the 1983-1989 period--some 1,556 jobs, or 82.6
percent of the total.
Another major manufacturing grouping consists of primary and fabricated metals,
transportation equipment and miscellaneous manufacturing. This category accounted for
10.1 percent of manufacturing job growth, although employment declined slightly over
the 1986-1989 period.
Finally, other manufacturing includes a variety of activities, including wineries, apparel
and textiles, printing, plastics and leather. While this category showed an increase from
601 to 738 jobs over the 1983-1989 period, the data show a significant dip in 1986--to
416 jobs. Wineries are noteworthy within this category of other manufacturing, with
expansion over the 1983-1989 period from 73 to 235 employees. While many wineries
are outside the City, their economic viability can enhance other economic activities in the
area, particularly tourism.
15
Long Distance Transportation is usually associated with: warehousing/manufacturing, railroad
transportation, motor freight transportation/warehousing and transportation by air.
October 3, 1991
120
Existing Conditions Report
6861-(861 :WlIV YI033WaL
HJMOllD ~N3WAOr:IdW3 DNIlIfll3V.IIONVW .110 NOlLISOdW03 3lU
9l3r:IHV.L
ql"'o.J~
3U!.IDl;J8JD U8W
08 JO 3J8qS
6861-f861
~3U8q;)
lU~m.(Oldm3:
-
9861
lu~m.(oldw3:
6861
6C)
(,6
(861
(SE) SJu~WtUlSUI
(C)() <i:l1l101J;l:lI:J
(!;\:) ,(j:lllIlPl!~
-- .- - .-- . . -...--
,A.l03aJ'O ltU!-lRl3DJllunW
%9'ZS
%1"01
)~S'
061
Ht>L'
86E
IPP
80Z
gU!JTlp1?JnU1?W J~Q10
(6E) gU!l1ll:>1?Jnu1?w sno~U1?I1:l:)S~
<L€) lu~wd!nb~ uO!l1?llOdSUlU.l
(PE'EE) SIt!l~W p:>>tr.>!lq1?J PU1? AJ1?W!ld
%0'001
%E'L
I'SS'I
SEt
SSS'1
6EL
81'S'1
91P
100'1
109
'()[ 'a, 'cz '5(: 'trZ 'EC; 'zz 'oz ~J1! s:IpOO :)IS I~!p-Z ~ql 'llu!-'nPIlJllullw J:lqlo JOd
'If pUll
's:lS:IqlU~Jed U! UMOqS ~JIl bls) SUO!lIl:)y!SSIlI:) J1!!-,lsnpuI pJIlpUIlIS l!ll!J)'z ~1lL
's;)!IS!IIlIS l~lJJIlW ":)uI '$;JIIl!:>ossV lreWJjOH '11 ,{~llreIS
l81o,L
I
::r.>JROS
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The Composition of Services Growth
Table 27 shows the composition of services growth in Temecula over the 1983-1989
period. Business and professional services accounted for over 63 percent of all services
employment growth--1,313 out of 2,080 jobs. This component of services employment
includes many activities which are basic in nature, such as computer services, and which
enhance the attractiveness of TemecuJa for other economic activities.
Next in importance were personal and repair services and health and legal services. A
greater range of these activities makes Temecula attractive to both businesses and
households.
The amusement, recreation and lodging services showed growth of 80 employees, only
3.8 percent of all services growth. It is recognized that the lodging sector has expanded
since 1989 with the addition of a full service hotel. As Temecula's economic base
matures, these service activities will provide important amenities for both the businesses
and households in the area.
Finally, other services grew by 186 jobs--8.9 percent of the total. This category includes
private educational and social services, museums, membership organizations and
miscellaneous services.
Conclusions Re2ardin2 Temecula's Economic Base
The following conclusions are presented based on a preliminary analysis of the Temecula
employment base:
.
The Temecula economy grew rapidly during the 1983-1986 period; and
grew very rapidly over the 1986-1989 period.
.
Temecula's employment growth has outpaced growth of both southwest
Riverside County and the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA.
.
The Temecula economy shows strength both in manufacturing and service
activities.
.
Manufacturing growth has been strong in the high technology industries,
and there has been moderate growth in other manufacturing activities.
.
Services employment growth has been led by business and professional
services. These activities can provide basic employment in their own
right, and also provide services to attract and retain other basic
businesses.
October 3, 1991
122
Existing Conditions Report
ql"'().I~
~;)!A.I~s
IIV JO ;uuqS
6861-f861
~~uuqJ
lu~mAoldm3
9861
lu~mAoldm3
6861-(861 :WlIV V1n~3:W3.L
HJ.MOlI~ J.N:tIWAO'ldW:tI S:tI~IAlI:tIS .!IO N01LISOdWO~ :tIRL
L'l :nUVJ.
uomsodmo~
~IS
,,:I!O-'l
%0'001
%6'S
%S'n
%S'f
%S'lI
%1"f9
I9Z
Hf'I
080',
981
OPZ
08
6861
J7S9',
66Z
tOf
80f
8Vf
~6i:'
Sf8
9SZ
S6
PSI
179
n:z
J7LS
fn
19
8ZZ
L8
~~
(861
6S'SS'9S'PS'f8 ~S
18 'OS
6L 'SL 'OL
9L 'SL 'ZL
L~ 'H
~::>!AI:lS
8u!8pO'1 w UOnR:lJ::>:l~ 'lU:lW:lsnwy
:l::>!AI:lS J!Rd:l~ W IlruOSJ:ld
!.':lJI^IJS 1'~1I0ISS;).I()I<I ~ SSJlII!.11((
'~..........._.-._...-_................__..
.uO~:JlR;) 3U(.IIIP8JIIU8W
S:l::>!A!:lS J:lqlQ
IR8:YI W q1(R:lH
"s;)!IS!leJg 1;JlfJ1lW ";'01
1810~
'$;llll!:>OSSV lreWJJOH "11 A:JIlre1S
::J:>JROS
CITY OF TEMECUlA
General Plan Program
.
Temecula has not shown significant growth in long distance
transportation; and wholesale trade has declined. Given Temecula's
relatively isolated location compared to locations such as Ontario and
Rancho Cucamonga, warehouse and distribution activities are not
anticipated to playa major role in the future growth of Temecula.
.
Over the 1983-1989 period, the area economy added many local-serving
activities, including a range of retail trade, and personal and repair
services.
.
Additional growth and diversification in the finance sector, in health and
legal services, and in amusement, recreation and lodging services will
enhance Temecula's capabilities to serve residents and to attract and
retain businesses.
4.3.2 Metropolitan and Subregional Employment Trends
The metropolitan and subregional employment trends are presented to provide a context
in which to evaluate the Temecula economy. Temecula can be viewed as competing for
economic growth with other subregions in the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA, and to
lesser extent with subregions in San Diego and Orange counties.
Temecula's employment growth potential is represented not just by its capture of new
growth in Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Orange counties, but also by its
ability to attract existing businesses which are relocating. At this stage of the analysis,
the focus is on new growth. The following sections discuss metropolitan and subregional
growth trends.
The Riverside-San Bernardino MSA
Table 28 shows the metropolitan employment trends over the period from 1980 to 1990.
The Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) consists of the
combined counties of Riverside and San Bernardino. The MSA includes a number of
economic subregions:
.
Southwest Riverside County, the immediate competitive area for
Temecula
.
The Riverside-Corona-Moreno Valley area
.
The East and West San Bernardino Valley, extending from Redlands on
the east to Montclair and Chino on the west
.
The Coachella Valley, including Palm Springs and other desert resort
communities
.
Numerous other mountain and desert regions and communities
October 3, 1991
Existing Conditions Report
124
"pgptl1"U! IOU 018 SJOlIJOM PO,{O(dIDO JIOS "lIJOM JO o:>,,(d I" polano:> 'lUOID,{OldIDO .u..f"S pu" oll.,,^, sopnl"U! luom,{o(d1D3 'l:
'oo!pJ1IUJ08 lI1lS pull "I'!$lO^!lI JO lIO!luno:> J'OC'!qtDoo OIJI JO "'"SUOO (vsvV -V I""!IS!lllIS Ulll!lodOJIOW OO!PJeUJ"B lJ"S-"I'!$lO^!lI otU 'I :soloN
'0661 'lsnllnv 'VsW OU!pJl!UJ"B U1lS-"I'!SJ0^!l 'ao!letDJoJUlllu!'""'1d I"lUIlIY 'luomlJll(loa luo!DdoIO^O() IUOID,{0(d1D3 "!WOJ!fI!;)
'''''I 'sOl"!:lOSSV D1lIDJJOH 11 ,{ofUlllS :o"mos
%E"S OS'SSL m'tOL 06'SS9 O1"~9 O9'PSS Os-L1'S 16'6OS 9S'EL1' 1'6'SS1' 1 S'W1' 06'ZS1' 1810j.
%0'1' OE'OSI OL'LH O9'8Z1 O9'O'll 00'911 08' 60 I OO'SOI OO'W1 08'10 I 09'101 on01 lu:)ww:)^OD
%1'L OL"LL I OE'61'1 00'61'1 OS'l1'1 OL'0E1 onzl onol OL'66 OS '96 09'[6 0L'6S ~!^J:)S
%1"S O1'ZE 0L'8Z EE'LZ O1'9Z OO'tz 06'IZ 06'OZ 08'61 00'61 OS'61 06'Sl :)181~ IB:lJ ':lOullJnsu! ':r.>lreu!..:I
%1'S 08'61'1 O'l'Z1'1 OL'tE1 06'&1 O9'O'lI OO'E11 OS'SOl 0s-L6 OO'E6 (WZ6 06'06 :)pBJl I !Bl:)}I
%s-L onE OL'9Z (>>'~ OS'lZ O9'O'l 08'61 OZ'SI OS'91 OS'Sl 08'Sl (>>'Sl :)PllJl :)(llS:>loqh\
%Z'E OO'SE OO'EE (>>'lE OS'OE OO'OE (>>'6Z IZ'EE 98'lE W'lE K1E O9'SZ ~!1!l!1n 'uo!1B:)!Unwwoo 'UO!181rodSUBJj.
%E'E 0L'88 (>>'88 O8'PS 01'08 OS'tL 08'69 06'E9 OE'6S (>>'6S OE'W O8'E9 8Upl\1~BJnuBW
%6'6 OO'L9 OZW OL'SS OL'61' 06U (WSE O9'ZE O1'El 09'61 o1'El o1'9Z UO!pn.llSUOJ
%S't- on on on on on on on on on o1'z OE'Z 8u!U!W
%n O8'IZ O8'IZ O9'ZZ O'l'ZZ OO'El O!HZ OZ'ZZ O9'ZZ O8'O'l O9'OZ 06'SI s:)!J:)qsg '.{Jls:>JOJ ':)Jnlln~!J8v
qlA\o.r~ 0661 6861 8861 L861 9861 S861 17861 (861 l861 1861 0861 OO!SJA!CI A.JlSOPOI
I'JDony
3StuaAV saaAoldw3: JO spoesnoqj.
(VSW> WlIV '1V3llSllV~S NV~nOdOllJ3W ONlffilVNH:!I9 NVS-:fIOISlI:!IAIlI
NOISIAIO AlllSOONI A9 SONmI~ ~N:!IWAO'1dW:!IlIO.L3:!1S aLVAIlId
8, ~rnrv~
CITY OF TEMECUIA
General Plan Program
The fastest growing industry over the last decade in the MSA was construction, at 9.9
percent annual growth, followed by wholesale trade, at 7.5 percent annual growth. Other
rapidly growing industries included services, at 7.1 percent annual growth; and finance,
insurance and real estate, at 5.4 percent annual growth; and retail trade, at 5.1 percent
annual growth.
Overall employment growth in the MSA averaged 5.3 percent per year, with employment
increasing from 452,900 in 1980 to 755,500 in 1990. During the period from 1983 to
1989, annual employment growth in the MSA averaged 6.8 percent, compared to 20.4
percent annual growth in Temecula during the same period.
Southwest Riverside County
Table 29 shows private sector employment data for the subregion of southwest Riverside
County during the period from 1983 to 1989. Southwest Riverside County includes the
cities and communities of Temecula, Rancho California, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Perris,
Hemet and San Jacinto, as well as smaller cities and communities in the subregion.
Southwest Riverside County does not include the Riverside-Corona-Moreno Valley
subregion. Employment growth in southwest Riverside County averaged 12.9 percent per
year, a faster rate than in the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA but slower than in the
Temecula area.
Leading growth industries in the subregion include construction, with 33.4 percent annual
employment growth and 5,036 new jobs; retail trade, at 12.9 percent and 6,675 new jobs;
services, at 11.9 percent and 4,804 new jobs; and manufacturing, at 9.7 percent and 3,117
new jobs. These four industries account for 87.6 percent of all new jobs in the subregion
during the period from 1983 to 1989. These growth trends for the larger subregion are
very similar to those presented for Temecula above.
Emplovment Capture Analvsis
In southwest Riverside County and in Temecula, employment growth rates have exceeded
those of the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA as a whole.
Southwest Riverside County's Growinl! Share of MSA Emplovment. Table 30 shows a
comparison of private sector employment in the Riverside~San Bernardino MSA with that
in the subregion of southwest Riverside County in 1983, 1986 and 1989. In 1983, the
20,853 jobs in the subregion comprised about 5.7 percent of total employment in the
MSA. By 1986, employment in the subregion had increased in absolute number to
29,279, and to 6.2 percent of total MSA employment. By 1989, employment in southwest
Riverside County comprised about 7.6 percent of total MSA employment. This increasing
share of employment reflects the rapid growth of southwest Riverside County compared
to the MSA as a whole.
Southwest Riverside County's Capture of MSA Emplovment Growth. Table 31 shows the
comparative employment growth in the MSA and southwest Riverside County. During
the period from 1983 to 1986, growth in the subregion amounted to 8.2 percent of the
total growth in the MSA. During the period from 1986 to 1989, capture in the subregion
October 3, 1991
126
Existing Conditions Report
6861-E861
al8ll qlMo.r~
IBOOUY a3tuaAV
6861-E861
a~oBq3
loaWAOldw3
6861-E861
1 9861 1
saaAold1D3 )0 .IaqwoN
:saNffill ~N3:WA.O'dW3 lI0.L33S ID.VAIlId
llNOO::> 3UISlI3AIlI ~S3MH~OOS
6l 3'19V~
6861
E861
~nl
%6"n
%'l;L
%6"ZI
%O"Z-
%O"S
%nl
%J7ff
%Q"IZ
%6"61
SP
ZIS
_L-
S06
SOS'f
9fO'S
9Ito'l,
tos'p
9lS
SL9'9
(Z6Y)
69'Z'rto
99L'6
ZfP'Z
L06'z1
ISP'I
ISP'Z
SSZ'L
SZ1'9
99
ZLL
6L,'6,
toZ'9
fE9'1
J>8Z'6
OOZ'I
IS9'1
P6S'S
S6S'Z
6P
69P
'hJJS:lJOJ
OO!li!Am
lZ
09l
9tS'1
ffit'E
680'1
S:lmmn 'uo!Je:llUnwwoo
rss'o,
Z96'P
909'1
ZEZ'9
PS9'1
:lJI1JS:l II1:lJ
':l:>UI1JnSU
.c..lsnpO[
s:Y.>!,u:lS
':l:>Ul1U!d
:lpl1J1 1 !l1J:l~
:lpI1JJ :llllS:llollJ\\.
'uo!Jl1JrodsuI1J~
llupnpl1Jnul1J^l
uo!pnJ1suOJ
llu !U!J^l
':lJnun:J!lllv
--
S:lp:lljsg
18l0~
""'!lS!11!ISI~1IJ1lW
""01
'n!e!:lOSSV OllWjJOH "11 ,(~JlIIlIS
:nmos
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I
i Rlyerside-San Bemardino MSA
TABLE 30
PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT LEVELS BY INDUSTRY DIVISION
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO MSA
AND SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
1983-1989
I
Number of Employees
1983 I 1986 I 1989
. . "
Agriculture, forestry, fisheries 22,600 23,000 21,800
Mining 1,200 1,300 1,400
Construction 23,100 43,900 65,200
Manufacturing 59,300 74,500 88,400
Transportation, communication, utilities 25,600 30,000 33,000
Wholesale trade 16,500 20,600 26,700
Retail trade 97,500 120,600 142,200
Finance, insurance, real estate 19,800 24,000 28,700
Services 99,700 130,700 159,300
Total 365,300 468,600 566,700
I Soutb".est Rivcr.dde CouDty
Agriculture, forestry, fisheries 260 469 772
Mining 21 49 66
Construction 1,089 2,895 6,125
Manufacturing 3,483 5,894 7,288
Transportation, communication, utilities 1,546 1,651 2,451
Wholesale trade 1,654 1,200 1,462
Retail trade 6,232 9,284 12,907
Finance, insurance, real estate 1,606 1,633 2,432
Services 4,962 6,204 9,766
Total 20,853 29,279 43,269
!l Soutbwest Rivenide Couut)' Sbare or MSA
; Agricuhurc:. iorest~y. fishcru:s
0012 i
() 020
() Ins
Mining 0.Ql8 0.038 0.047
Construction 0.047 0.066 0.094
Manufacturing 0.059 0.079 0.082
Transportation, communication, utilities 0.060 0.055 0.074
Wholesale trade 0.100 0.058 0.055
Retail trade 0.064 0.077 0.091
Finance, insurance, real estate 0.081 0.068 0.085
Services 0.050 0.047 0.061
Total 0.057 0.062 0.076
Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associatea, Inc.
California Employment Development Department, Annual Planning Information
Riverside-San Bernardino MSA, July 1990
Market Statistics
October 3, 1991
128
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 31
PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT GROWTII BY INDUSTRY
DIVISION
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO MSA
AND SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
1983-1989
Employment Change
1983-198611986-1989 I Total Period
1983-1989
I . " , .
.1 Riverside-Sun BemardlDo MSA
Agriculture, forestry, fisheries 400 (1,200) (800)
Mining 100 100 200
Construction 20,800 21,300 42,100
Manufacturing 15,200 13,900 29,100
Transportation, communication, utilities 4,400 3,000 7,400
Wholesale trade 4,100 6,100 10,200
Retail trade 23,100 21,600 44,700
Finance, insurance, real estate 4,200 4,700 8,900
Services 31,000 28,600 59,600
Total 103,300 98,100 201,400
II Southwelo1 Riverside County
II
Agricul ture, forestry, fisheri es 209 303 512
Mining 28 17 45
Construction 1,806 3,230 5,036
Manufacturing 2,411 1,394 3,805
Transportation, communication, utilities 105 800 905
Wholesale trade (454) 262 (192)
Retail trade 3,052 3,623 6,675
Finance, insurance, real estate 27 799 826
Services 1,242 3,562 4,804
Total 8,426 13,990 22,416
Southwest Riverside County Sban: of MSA
Agriculture, forestry, fisheries 0.523 -0.253 -0.640
Mining 0.280 0.170 0.225
Construction 0.087 0.152 0.120
Manufacturing 0.159 0.100 0.131
Transportation, communication, utilities 0.024 0.267 0.122
Wholesale trade -0.111 0.043 -0.019
Retail trade 0.132 0.168 0.149
Finance, insurance, real estate 0.006 0.170 0.093
Services 0.040 0.125 0.081
Total 0.082 0.143 0.111
Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
California Employment Development Departmen~ Annual Planning Information
Riverside-San Bernardino MSA, July 1990
Market Statistics
October 3, 1991
129
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
was even higher, at 14.3 percent of the total growth in the MSA Over the entire period
from 1983 to 1989, southwest Riverside County captured about 11.1 percent of all new
jobs in the MSA
Observations Re~ardin2 the Southwest Riverside County Subre2ion
Many of the trends for southwest Riverside County are quite similar to those for
Temecula:
· The southwest Riverside County area has shown attractiveness for all
types of local-serving employment over the 1883-1989 period, reflecting
the rapid housing growth in the area.
· Generally, the 1986-1989 period has shown much more rapid growth than
the 1983-1986 period.
· Manufacturing and services employment growth reflect the southwest
Riverside County attraction to high technology, diversified manufacturing,
and business and professional services.
· Southwest Riverside County is not viewed as having locational and
transportation characteristics suitable for warehousing and distribution
activities.
4.3.3 Existing Retail Conditions
This analysis of existing retail conditions provides an overview of the retail sales in
Temecula, compared with the purchasing power estimated to be generated by City
residents.
Purchasing Power Estimates
The estimates of purchasing power in Temecula are based on Census data regarding
households and average incomes. The following table shows estimates are based on
income estimates based on housing values and contract rents:
TABLE 32
ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD PURCHASING POWER
CITY OF TEMECULA: 1990
Renters: 3,252 Households @ $27,995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $93.15 million
Owners: 5,322 Households @ $61,868 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $358.71 million
Aggregate Household Income ........................... $451.86 million
Estimated Retail Purchasing Power
@ 45% of Household Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $203.34 million
October 3, 1991
130
Existing Conditions Report
I!Bl311 p3JBW!lS"J{ I!Bl311 aU!lS!x:1I
(SJl?lI0a }O SPUl?snollL uJ)
NOllVlildOd ~NI~SIX:-fI - 3lIil.LdV3 (lNY :-fI~vxv:in S'JI'lVS'IIV.LIDI
Vlil3:-f1W:-fI~..'I0 llI3
EE :-fI'IHV~
PUBW3(1 O~
S3IBS JO o!JBlf
(9)
PUBW3(1
SOIl!W S3IBS
(5)
S!SAIBUV 3.lnJdB3
pUBW3(1
JU3;).I3d
(t)
S3IBS
P3JBW!lS'J(
(E)
JU3;).13d
(l)
S31BS
IBOPV
(1)
~6'1
99'€
99'1
ZO'Z
E8'1
6L"1
86'1
ZP'O
U"1
96"1
69'1
6€'1
9PZ'€61$
601'OS
-
L99'01
9>>'8Z
S06'SI
ZPL'S
Z9t'81
(€S6)
L69'1 P
PI9'S
8SP'Pt
8LO'E$
%0'001
%Z'6
%0'8
%8'H
%P'6
%9'€
%E'6
%8'0
%6'SZ
%6'Z
%Z'OI
%6'E
9EE'WZ$
ZEL'81
P1O'91
P1O'8Z
9S0'61
lLZ'L
P16'81
IP9'1
66L '8S
ZZ8'~
908'OZ
886'L$
%0'001
%P'Ll
%8'9
%Z'Pl
%8'8
%E'€
%P'6
%Z'O
%€'SZ
%6'Z
%6'8
%8'Z
9€p'n
t9Z'SE
-
99O'n$
.uOa3JB3
:)S~pUl?q:)J:)W
S:)J01S
I!Bl311
I:)Jl?ddy
S:)J01S 3rua
Il?J:)u:)D
18S'96E
1 P8'89
OOO'LZ
09P'9S
1%'PE
Ho'n
9LE'L€
889
9LP'001
S:Y.>l?ld 3uPlu~a 7f1 3UH18
S:)J01S
JOnbn p:)31?:>f:)l?d
S:)J01S pootl
S1U:)W:)ldwI WJl?&Sll?~:)1l?W '3PIH
s:Y.>Ul?Hddy ,ftJU!qs~uJntl :)woH
yS:)J01S Hl?l~~ J:)ql0
SUOHl?lS :Y.>~J\J:)S
s~Hddns olny 7f1 SJ~ll?:)a olOy
ItnO.L
"~JOlS AJddns U;)PJl/D pUll WJIl.'l pUll 's:lJOlS AIJIl!:>;xJS 'qooH pUll AJIlUO!lIllS 'SYU;)WII.I1SUI JI!:>!snw 'spoon gU!1JodS 's:l!lP^ON pUll spoon IJV 'Sll!n :s;)pnpUI
s:llllpOSsy pUll SIlWlll"l ;)P 'J;)l!JJ;)PU!H
':>UI 'S;)lllpOSsy UllWJJOH 'M A;)(UIllS
y
:OOJnos
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Existing retail sales, compiled from sales tax data obtained from Hinderliter, de Llammas
and Associates for the period from July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991, are shown in
Table 33. Sales of non-taxable items such as food for home consumption and prescription
drugs are estimated using ratios based on State Board of Equalization estimates. In total,
Temecula retail sales over the period are estimated at $396.58 million, as shown in
Column 1.
Capture Analvsis
As shown in the capture analysis, Table 33, Column 6, retail sales in Temecula currently
exceed local demand by a ratio 1.95 to 1.00. Actual retail sales of $396.6 million exceed
the potential retail sales of $203.3 million, with a capture of $193.2 million from trade
areas outside the City. The high capture rate indicates that Temecula is positioning itself
as a regional retail destination for consumers in southwest Riverside County. The high
capture may also be attributed to sale of goods and services along Interstate 15, and to
sales to workers in Temecula's employment base. The highest capture rates occur for
building materials and farm implements, at 2.53; drug stores, at 2.37; other retail stores,
at 2.33; and service stations, at 2.23.
Conclusions Re2ardin2 Existin2 Retail Conditions
Based on this preliminary analysis, the following conclusions are drawn regarding
Temecula's retailing base.
· Temecula serves as a retailing center for a trade area extending well beyond the
City limits.
· Temecula's strongest retail sectors include food and drug stores, building
materials, and service stations and other retail stores, particularly gifts/art goods,
sporting goods, musical instruments, stationary books, specialty stores and
farm/garden supplies.
· Retail sectors with lesser capture include apparel, general merchandise, eating and
drinking places and home furnishings and appliances.
Based on these preliminary conclusions, further analysis will focus on retailing by
shopping center types; and on Temecula's potential to enhance its role as a major retailing
center in southwest Riverside County.
,
October 3, 1991
132
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
4.4 Fiscal Conditions
4.4.1 Fiscal Analysis Approach
The following paragraphs identify the jurisdictions covered, the types of revenues and
costs to be analyzed and the approach to preparation of revenue and cost factors.
Recurrinl! Revenues and Costs Analvzed. The projections will be made for recurring
revenues and costs to the City and the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD).
Revenue for development processing (such as building permits) are not included in this
analysis, nor are revenues for funding of capital facilities. Costs are projected only for
recurring costs and not for capital costs.
City of Temecula. The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989 and
provides a number of services, including police and fire protection and animal control;
public works maintenance; planning and building; and citywide functions, including City
council, City manager, City clerk, finance and non departmental costs.
Temecula Community Services District. The Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) was created at the same time that the City was incorporated, and provides
recreation services, park planning and development and landscaping of parks, slopes, and
medians in the City. The TCSD directors and the Temecula City council are the same
persons.
The approach to the analysis has included interviews with key personnel of the City of
Temecula, The TCSD, and the Riverside County Fire Department. The fiscal analysis has
. also included detailed review of City, TCSD and County Fire Department budget
documents.16 The emphasis at this stage of the analysis is in the preparation of revenue
and cost factors, expressed on a per unit basis such as per capita for police protection
services, per lane mile for road maintenance services, and per acre for parks main.tenance.
The fiscal projections will be prepared for both the City of Temecula and the TCSD. No
projections will be made of other jurisdictions, such as school districts or special districts.
16
While projections will not direct! y be made for the Riverside County Fire Department, their staff was
interviewed and their budget was analyzed, since they provide fire protection services under contract
to and cooperatively with the City of Temecula.
October 3, 1991
133
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
4.4.2 Revenue Estimation Methodology
City of Temecula Revenues
Factors are estimated for all recurring revenues that will be generated by new
development occurring within the City. Revenues include taxes, utility franchises, State
subventions, fines and forfeitures and miscellaneous revenues. Revenues are projected
against different bases, depending upon the nature of that revenue source. Generally, per
capita factors have been developed for State subventions, fines and forfeitures and
franchise fees, while development-based or land use factors have been developed for
property tax, sales tax, property transfer tax, and transient occupancy tax. Revenues from
business licenses, engineering services, and building inspection are not projected because
they are collected as fees and charges for current services rendered and are assumed to
have no net impact on the city's fiscal balance.
Factors for revenues projected on a per capita basis are developed by dividing current
revenues by current population. Various agencies estimate the City's population as shown
below:
1990 Census (1989 data) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,099
State Department of Finance (OOF), January 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,382
State Controller (three times registered voters) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,546
City of Temecula estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,000
For State subventions, statewide per capita allocations are used. Factors for locally
generated revenues that are projected on a per capita basis--such as franchise fees,
recreation fees and miscellaneous revenues--are developed using the City's estimate of
35,000.
Property Tax. The one percent property tax is levied on the taxable value of secured and
unsecured property. Property tax proceeds from development in the City are allocated
among several jurisdictions, including the City, Riverside County, school districts and
special districts. The property tax allocation for the City is estimated based on the recent
transfer of services from Riverside County to Temecula at its incorporation in December
1989. Based on California Government Code ~56842, the City's initial allocation, or base
property tax, is calculated by multiplying the following:
1. The cost of services transferred from the County to the City
2. The percentage of County general purpose revenue comprised of property tax
October 3, 1991
134
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
This base property tax transfer is then translated into a share, or percentage of the one
percent property tax levy for each Tax Rate Area (TRA) in the City. On the basis of a
sampling of 20 TRAs, the average property tax allocation to the City of Temecula is
estimated at 5.78 percent of the one percent basic property tax levy, as shown in Table 34.
TABLE 34
CITY OF TEMECULA PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION
Minimum Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.51%
Maximum Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.12%
Average Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.78%
Source: Riverside County Auditor-Controller
Franchise Fees. The City has franchise agreements with Southern California Edison and
Southern California Gas Company. The City is currently negotiating franchise agreements
with two cable companies, Inland Valley Cable and Johnson Intercable, and two solid
waste disposal companies, Temecula Environmental and Waste Management of Inland
Empire. The City receives franchise fees from these companies based on a percent of
gross revenues. Total franchise fees for fiscal year 199111992 are estimated at $452,822.
Franchise fees are projected at $12.96 per capita, based upon an estimated population of
35,000.
Sales Tax. Sales tax revenues, at one percent of taxable sales, are projected based on
estimated taxable sales associated with future development. Taxable retail sales are
estimated for retail and business park, and industrial land uses on annual sales per square
foot basis. Taxable sales per square foot factors are estimated for Temecula. The taxable
sales generation rates for retail centers are generally based on overall statistics from
Dollars and Cents of ShODVinQ: Centers. 1990. from The Urban Land Institute. Taxable
sales for industrial, business park and R&D development are based on existing developed
acres and 1990 taxable sales business and industry tabulated by Hinderliter, de Llamas and
Associates. Taxable sales generation rates, on a per-square foot basis, are as follows:
Neighborhood Retail Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $155
Community Retail Centers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $200
Regional Retail Centers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $180
IndustriallBusiness Park/R&D ............................. $8.12
Use Tax. Use lax is levied upon the sale of goods where the sales tax is not collectible
at the point of sale. For the fiscal projections, use tax is estimated based on the allocation
of use tax since incorporation. Use tax is allocated from both a statewide pool and a
countywide pool to individual cities. The use tax factor is the ratio of sum of statewide
and countywide allocations divided by the gross direct sales tax allocation. This factor
is then applied to the projected sales tax to account for future allocations of use tax. The
use tax factor is calculated at 13.60 percent of taxable transactions and is applied as a
percentage of total sales tax allocated to the City. Table 35 shows the derivation of the
use tax factor.
October 3, 1991
135
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 35 I
CALCULATION OF USE TAX FACTOR
1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
quarter quarter quarter quarter Year
1990 1990 1990 1990 1990
(A) Statewide Allocation $4,669 $8,134 $10,598 $14,252 37,653
(B) Countywide Allocation $50,113 $105,338 $107,923 $148,644 412,018
(C) Total Allocation (A+B) 54.782 113.472 118,521 162,896 449,671
(0) Gross Direct Sales Tax $416,637 $854,760 $894,384 $1,140,906 3,306,687
(E) Use Tax Factor(C/D) 0.1315 0.1328 0.1325 0.1428 0.1360
(F) Total Sales and Use Tax (C+D) $416,637 $968,232 $894,384 $1.303,802 3,583,055
Prooerty Transfer Tax. The property transfer tax of $1.10 per $1,000 of transferred value
is levied on the sale of real property and is divided equally between the County of
Riverside and the City of Temecula. Transfer taxes are projected for both the initial
transfer of new development and for turnover of that development in subsequent years.
Residential property is estimated to transfer once every ten years, while commercial
property is estimated to transfer once every twelve years. Eighty percent of the total
valuation is assumed to be subject to the transfer tax to account for the equity in
transferred properties.
Transient Occuoancy Tax. A transient occupancy tax is levied on the gross room receipts
of hotels within the City at a rate of 8.0 percent. Hotel occupancy and room rates will
be based on market estimates to be developed as part of the fiscal modeling process.
Vehicle License Fees. Motor vehicle license fees are distributed to cities and counties on
a per capita basis. For newly incorporated cities, the State Controller estimates the
population for this distribution at three time the number of registered voters at
incorporation. The City is anticipating $1,154,025 in motor vehicle in lieu fees for fiscal
year 1991/1992, based on a State wide distribution to cities of $37.78 per capita and the
State Controller's population estimate of 30,546. Recent revisions to the California
Revenue and Taxation Code *11005.3 allow cities to receive motor vehicle license fees
based either this State subventions population or the State Department of Finance estimate.
If the City's higher estimate of 35,000 is used as the basis, the total distribution would
increase but the per capita distribution from the State would remain the same. Therefore,
motor vehicle in lieu fees are projected using the 1991/1992 State Controller's per capita
distribution of $37.78.
State Gasoline Tax. State gasoline tax revenues are estimated for the allocation of revenue
received by cities under Sections 2105, 2106 and 2107 of the Streets and Highways Code.
State gasoline tax is estimated at $6.95 per capita for Section 2105, as of January 1, 1994,
based on the full $0.09 per gallon. Section 2106 is estimated at $4.07 per capita, and
Section 2107 is estimated at $8.82 per capita. Gas tax revenues are maintained separately
in a Gas Tax Fund and are then transferred to the General Fund where they can be
applied to allowable costs for road and circulation system maintenance.
October 3, 1991
136
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Local Transoortation Funds. Revenues from Measure A and other local transportation
funds are maintained in a separate fund. Measure A funds are received from the proceeds
of a 0.5 cent sales tax enacted in June 1990. City allocations are estimated at 35 percent
of the 0.5 cent sales tax collected, or 0.175 percent of taxable sales. Measure A funds are
for expenditure of highway improvements and fixed route transit facilities only.
Interest Factor. Interest earnings from the investment of liquid fund balances are projected
based on the ratio of estimated 1991/1992 interest earnings divided by all other general
fund revenues. For fiscal year 1991/1992, $500,000 in interest revenue is estimated based
on all other general fund revenues, estimated at $11,701,237. This amounts to an
annualized rate of 4.27 percent.
Temecula Community Services District Revenues
The Temecula Community Services District was formed at incorporation and is
coterminous with the City boundaries. Prior to incorporation, Riverside County provided
services to the area through three County Service Areas. These were CSA 75, CSA 103
and CSA 143. At incorporation, the services provided by these CSAs were transferred
to the City and the TCSD.
Parcel CharlZe. TCSD revenues are generated through a parcel charge. The rate is
adjusted annually to provide funding levels that directly relate to programs and service
levels approved for the corning fiscal year. The TCSD is comprised of four benefit zones,
or areas that provides a specific service only to those parcel within the zone. These zones
are as follows:
· Community ServiceslParks Operation and maintenance, improvements and
administration of the City community park system,
recreation facilities, services and programs.
· Service Level A Service operation, maintenance, energy improvements
and administration for all arterial street lighting and
median. All non-exempt parcels are included within this
service level.
· Service Level B Service operation, maintenance, energy improvements
and administration for all local street lighting within
recorded subdivisions.
· Service Level C Service, operation, maintenance, improvements and
administration for all perimeter landscaping and slop
maintenance within recorded subdivisions.
October 3, 1991
137
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Revenues are projected only for Community ServiceslParks, which relate to citywide
services and programs. Service level A, Service Level B and Service Level Care
assumed to be revenue neutral. In the case of Service Level A, the TCSD will set their
assessments based upon future costs for street lights and median. The TCSD will follow
the same procedure for Service Levels Band C, which are for specific recorded
subdivisions. Revenues will be projected at the current assessment rates for residential
and commercial land, as shown in Table 36.
TABLE 36
TEMECUIA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
COMMUNITY SERVICES AND PARKS ASSESSMENT
I Land Use Category I Developed I Undeveloped I
Agriculture $24.95 per ac
Commercial $299.40 per ac $199.60 per ac
Single Family Residential: less than one $49.90 per du $24.95 per parcel
acre
Single Family Residential: greater than one $49.90 per du $99.80 per ac
acre
Multi-Family Residential $37.43 per unit
Mobile Home $37.43 per unit
Vacant/Other $199.60 per ac
Source: Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District, Fiscal Year 1991/1992. Muni
Financial Services, Inc.
4.4.3 Cost Estimation Methodology
Costs associated with future development are projected for general government,
. community development, police and fire protection, and animal control. Additionally,
costs are projection for the Temecula Community Services District.
City of Temecula Costs
Police Services. Police services are provide to the City of Temecula under a contract with
the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The City currently has 31 sworn officers, or
0.89 sworn officers per 1,000 population based on the City's population estimate of
35,000. The City wishes to maintain a service level of one sworn officer per 1,000
population as the City continues to develop. Police costs are projected on a per capita
basis for future population, at the rate of one officer per 1,000 population. Table 37
shows the calculation of police services costs per 1,000 population. The per capita police
cost is estimated at $115.51.
October 3, 1991
138
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 37 I
POLICE SERVICES COST FACTORS
Staff'mg Staff'mg per Annual Cost per 1,000
1,000 Population Cost Population
Sworn patrol officers 0.94 $109,8171 $103,228
Sworn resource officers 0.06 $67,391 $4,043
Support staff 0.22 $32,904 $7,239
Total cost per 1,000 Population $115,510
Total cost per capita $115.51
Source: City of Temecula Police Department
1 Includes patrol car cost of $4,193 per sworn officer.
Fire Services. Fire services are provided jointly by the California Department of Forestry
(CDF) and the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) under a contract with the City
of Temecula. The RCFD receives funding from contract cities, special district
augmentation funds, Riverside County general purpose revenues and from the CDF for
stations with CDF equipment when fires present a threat to CDF fire management areas.
Current stations and staffing in Temecula are shown below. Staffing figures represent the
number of personnel on duty at any time.
Station 73:
7 full time firefighters
1 engine company
1 truck company
Station 12:
2 CDF firefighters
2 RCFD firefighters
1 City firefighter
1 light and air truck
1 squad
1 engine company
1 bulldozer
Table 38 summarizes the actual cost of providing fire services in the City and the related
funding sources for fiscal year 1990-1991. Operations, maintenance and personnel costs
averaged $1,107,383 per station in fiscal year 1990-1991, based on the RCFD 1990-1991
cost of $2,214,766 divided by two existing stations. The City's structure fire fund
contribution is based on a fire tax rate of 4.78 percent of the basic one percent property
tax levy. Revenues for future stations will be calculated using the structural fire tax rate
applied to future property valuation.
October 3, 1991
139
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 38
FIRE SERVICES REVENUES AND COSTS
FISCAL YEAR 1990-1991
I Cost Category ] 1990-1991 I
Expenditures
Riverside County Fire Department
Utilities and operating costs $60,400
Personnel costs $1,633,331
Planning costs $192,435
Service delivery costs $328,600
Total RCFD Cost $2,214,766
California Department of Forestry - Wildlands $653,957
protection
Total Fire Protection Cost $2,868,723
~I Funding Source
ij City of Tcmccula General Fund
City of Temecula Structural Fire Tax
Riverside County Fire Department (Residual)
Total Funding
1990-1991 Funding:1
I
$(" -3 (\-.., I
)) ,:.r). :
$1,051,176
$1,163,590
$2,868,723
Source: Riverside County Fire Department
City of Temecula 1990-1991 Budget
Fire costs associated with future development will be projected by determining locations
and operations costs of new stations. Three new stations are proposed by the Riverside
County Fire Master Plan, as shown in Table 39. As the phasing of future fire stations
becomes available, maintenance, operations and personnel costs will be projected for these
stations. The specific fire station operations costs will be determined as facilities and
operations plans are refined through the General Plan process. The final General Plan
analysis will include all operations costs and phasing.
I TABLE 39 I
PROPOSED FIRE STATIONS
Station Location
Redhawk Route 79 South in Redhawk planned community
Glen Oaks Rancho California Road at Anza Road
French Valley Airport Winchester Road at Benton Road
I Source: Riverside County Fire Department I
October 3, 1991
140
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Animal Control. The City contracts for animal control services with the Riverside County
Health Department. Services provided include the following: investigation of inhumane
treatment of animals; response to nuisance complaints and stray animal reports; the
issuance of citations and quarantine orders; enforcement of licensing regulations;
impounding stray animals, and other general services. The cost of animal control related
to future development is determined by applying the current per capita cost to future
population. The current budget for animal control is $80,000, or $2.29 per capita.
Public Works. The Public Works department consists of an Operations division and an
Engineering division. The engineering program provides approvals and coordination of
capital improvements projects related to the activities of private developers. Fees received
for engineering services, estimated to be $1,968,000 for fiscal year 1991-92, are greater
than projected expenditures, at $1,717,576. Consequently, engineering is considered to
be self-supporting and costs are not projected as part of the General Plan fiscal analysis.
The Operations division handles traffic analysis and engineering, drainage, pavement
management, and routine street maintenance. The Public Works department incurs
overhead costs for the administration and operation. Public works departmental overhead
is projected at 16.6 percent of direct public works costs, and consists of public works
personnel services, consulting services and other operating expenses, as shown in
Table 40.
II
:1 Indirect Costs
i Personnel services-Public Works
TABLE 40
PUBLIC WORKS OVERHEAD FACTOR
II
$'76.4.,5 .'
Consulting services $150,000
Other Operating Expenses $9,700
Total Departmental Overhead: $236,135
.I Direct Costs
i'
'.
Routine Street Maintenance (includes drainage) $680,000
Drainage .75,000
Personnel services-Roads $225,734
Traffic Signal Maintenance $100,000
Street Sweeping $225,000
Other direct costs $115,200
Total Direct Costs $1,420,934
Ratio of Indirect Costs to Direct Costs: 16.6%
Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
City of Temecula Public Works Department
October 3, 1991
141
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Public works cost factors for road and street maintenance, signal maintenance and street
sweeping are shown in Table 41. All direct costs are estimated based on the existing
budget and infrastructure inventory, and are projected against new infrastructure yet to be
built. Road and street maintenance costs, estimated at $4,604 per lane mile, are projected
per lane mile, based on an estimate of 213 existing lane miles. Road and street
maintenance costs include personnel, street maintenance and drainage costs. Traffic signal
maintenance, estimated at $5,882 per signalized intersection, is based on a budget of
$100,000 and 17 existing signalized intersections maintained by the City. Street sweeping
costs, estimated at $1,264 per curb mile, are based on an estimate of 178 curb miles and
a budget of $225,000.
I TABLE 41 I
PUBLIC WORKS COST FACTORS
Cost Category 1991-1992 Unit of Existi Per Unit
Budgeted Projection ng Cost
Amount Units Factor
Road and Street Maintenance
Personnel services $225,734
Routine street maintenance $680,000
Drainage facilities $75,000
maintenance
Total Road and Street $980,734 lane mile 213 $4,604
Maintenance
Traffic Signal Maintenance $100,000 signalized 17 $5,882
intersection
Street Sweeping $225,000 curb mile 178 $1,264
Source: City of Temecula Public Works Department
Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
Planninl!. The Planning Department is divided into operations and advance planning. The
operations division conducts current planning activities, primarily focused on the review
and processing of development proposals. This division is assumed to be supported by
fee revenues generated during the approval process. The Advanced Planning division is
responsible for long range community wide planning, including development and updates
of the General Plan and other studies. Since the need for advance planning increases as
the City develops, these costs are projected as part of this study. About $326,400 (32
percent) of the Planning Department 1991-92 budget is supported by planning fees
received in the course of development approval; the remaining $683,900 (67 percent)
represents a net cost to the City. The marginal cost of increased planning activity related
to future development in the City is assumed to be 50 percent of the current non-fee
supported planning budget. By projecting only the marginal cost, current expenditure on
items such as the General Plan is not reflected in future years. The marginal planning
cost is then projected on a per capita basis to represent the increase in advanced planning
activities as the City grows. The per capita factor is derived as shown in Table 42.
October 3, 1991
142
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 42
DERIVATION OF MARGINAL PLANNING COST FACTOR
1991-92 Planning budget $1,010,304
Less: 1991-92 Projected planning fees $326,400
Equals: Non-fee supported planning activity $683,904
Less: Cost of General Plan 50%
Equals: Planning activity related to future growth $341,952
Divided by: Current population 31,191
Equals: Per capita multiplier for future planning costs $10.96
Source: City of Temecula Finance Department
Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
Buildinl! and Safetv. The Building and Safety department conducts code enforcement and
provides building inspection services, primarily in relation to new development. Building
and Safety costs are projected to be entirely fee supported for fiscal year 1991-92.
Building fees are estimated at $1,100,000 while Building and Safety expenditures are
projected at $767,177, for a net surplus of $332,823. On this basis, Building and Safety
expenditures are not projected in the General Plan fiscal analysis.
Citvwide Overhead. These costs include the City council, City manager, City clerk, City
attorney, finance personnel and non-departmental expenditures. The citywide overhead
rate is calculated as the ratio of general government costs over direct line costs, as shown
in Table 43. The 28.1 percent rate includes the TCSD reimbursement for general
government costs attributed to administration of the district.
Temecula Community Services District Costs
Costs are projected only for Community Services and Parks within the TCSD. Service
levels A, Band C, which provide maintenance for street lighting and perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance are matched by assessment revenues which are set
. annually. Within the Community Services and Parks service level, costs are projected for
maintenance of future parks and operation of recreation programs and services.
Park Maintenance. Park maintenance costs for future parks are estimated at $15,000 based
on interviews with the TCSD Director. This cost reflects a higher level of service
associated with a greater diversity of future park facilities, and includes landscape
maintenance, facilities maintenance, services and supplies and department overhead. As
the City's parks and recreation master plan becomes available, necessary refinements to
the maintenance will be made.
October 3, 1991
143
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 43
DERIVATION OF CITYWIDE OVERHEAD FACTOR
:1 General Government Costs
Citv Counci:
"
.'
I!
3RO.485 ;i
City Manager 583,705
City Attorney 300,750
City Clerk 265,570
Finance 507,650
Personnel 105,665
Non-Departmental 917,600
Total General Government Costs 3,061,425
Less: Reimbursement from TCSD (250,000)
Effective General Government Costs 2,811,425
:Iii@gi.!#il::~m:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,::::::::::::m::::: ~:;~;:~;;;~;~~:~;:;~;~;;;;~;\t~t~!:;j;~~~;;;~~;;;;;~~;:!;;:(;;t;r;t~~~~~~t~!1!jj~rr?~~:~~~~;;;t~~~~;;:~;;:~;;!jjj~r~~r\~I(;;~!!~!;~;!~~~t!!~j~}f[~fff~~~}~~~~~~~~~r
Planning 1,010,304
Building and Safety 767,177
Engineering 1,717,576
Public Works 236,135
Roads 1,420,934
Police 4,124,007
Fire 656,523
Animal Control 80,000
Total Departmental Costs 10,012,656
Ratio of General Government Costs to Departmental Costs: 28.1 %
Source: City of Temecula Finance Department
Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
Recreation and Community Services. Costs projected for recreation and community
services include staffing, supplies and equipment and departmental overhead. Table 44
shows the derivation of the cost factor for recreation and community services. The
departmental overhead rate, at 45 percent, is calculated by dividing the salaries of the
CSD Director, Administrative Secretary, and two Office Assistants divided by all other
salaries in the Community Services Department. The department overhead rate is then
applied to community services line costs to generate a full departmental cost.
October 3, 1991
144
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 44
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COST FACTOR
I Cost Category 11991-1992 Budgeted Amount I
Salaries $92,906
Benefits $30,656
Supplies and equipment $25,000
Total line costs $148,562
Department overhead @ 45% of line costs $66,854
Full departmental cost $215,416
Less: Recreation fee revenues ($55,688)
Net recreation cost 159,728
Net recreation cost per capita $4.56
Source: Temecula Community Services Disbicl
Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
October 3, 1991
145
Existing Conditions Report
CHAPTER FIVE
Public Services and Utilities
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Chapter Five
PUBLIC SERVICES AND
UTILITIES
5.1 Public Services
5.1.1 Fire
Fire Services are provided jointly by the California Department of Forestry (CDF) and
Riverside County Fire Department (RDFD). Riverside County is responsible for the
majority of fire service, while the California Department of Forestry is only responsible
for those areas in the CDF management areas.
Currently there are two stations within the City of Temecula, Station 73 located at
and Station 12 located at . The following table outlines personnel
and equipment located at both stations.17
I TABLE 45 I
TEMECUIA FIRE FACILITIES AND STAFFING
I Station I Equipment I Number of Personnel I
173 1 engine company 7 full-time firefighters
1 truck company
1 light air truck 2 CDF firefighters
1 squad
12 1 engine company 2 RCFD firefighters
1 bulldozer 1 City firefighters
11
Information regarding service provision adequacy has not been acquired to date and will be included
when received.
October 3, 1991
146
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
5.1.2 Police
The Temecula Law Enforcement was initiated during the 1990 - 1991 fiscal year. Under
this program, the City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for law
enforcement services. This contract provides for thirty-one sworn officers and seven non-
sworn officers.18 In addition to officers contracted specifically to the City, two
lieutenants, seven sergeants and six investigators support the City assigned officers and
deputies. Other manpower resources such as bomb disposal, emergency services team,
and internal affairs investigation are provided through various divisions within the
Sheriff's Department.
During the month of July 1991, the number of service calls, excluding traffic citations and
on-site investigations, was 2,226. Average response times during this period are provided
below:
Priority one calls:
Priority two calls:
6.5 minutes
13.9 minutes
According to the Sheriff's Department these response times are well within industry
standards for adequate service levels. The City has indicated its intent to maintain a ratio
of 1 officer per 1,000 residents.
5.1.3 Education
The City of Temecula and its Sphere of Influence are under the jurisdiction of Temecula
Valley Unified School District. The following table summarizes school facilities within
these areas, as well as provides current capacity and enrollment figures.
I TABLE 46 I
SUMMARY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES
Name Location Current Enrollment
Capacity (July, 1991)
II
Ii Day Care Centers
I !
I
I Rancho Day Care 31530 La Serena Way 75 -:'! :
Vail Day Care 29915 Mira Lorna Drive 90 54
Red Hawk Day Care . 32045 Camino San Jose 90 58
(Ternecula)
18
Non-sworn officers perform field tasks where immediate suspect contact is not probable.
October 3, 1991
147
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
I TABLE 46 I
SUMMARY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES
Name Location Current Enrollment
Capacity (July, 1991)
-,
1\ .Elemectary Schools (K-S)
.! R t: El I
:. ane.o .cmentar\' " 31530 L:I Screr:a Wa\'
I
990 i
846
.
Joan F. Sparkman 32225 Pio Pico Road 600 548
Temecula Elementary 41951 Moraga Road 900 677
Vail Elementary 29915 Mira Loma Drive 960 601
Nicolas Valley 39600 N. General Kearney 660 438
Elementary . (Temecula)
Red Hawk Elementary 32045 Camino San Jose 660 617
k. (Temecula)
I!
:1 Milldle Schools (6-8)
Margarilll \1iddle
30600 :v1arganul Road
875
Temecula Middle 42075 Meadows Parkway
!i Seni(tr High Schools (9-12)
812
Temecula Valley 31555 Rancho Vista Road 3,120 2,270
Rancho Vista 31340 Rancho Vista Road 175 96
! Adult Schoof
il Temeeuia Adult School ; 31350 Ra::cho \-ista Road
Ii . Located within Sphere of IDf1U~Dce
n.a i: a i
",
il
The capacity of most of the above campuses is a mix of relocatable and permanent
facilities. This mix enables the District to adjust to student population and District
attendance boundary changes (refer to Table * for relocatable facilities).
Table _ summarizes Interim Campuses of relocatable facilities. These sites are located
adjacent to other permanent District facilities and are used to house students while
permanent facilities are under construction. The District has just completed an aggressive
construction phase and as a result houses all of its current population in permanent
facilities. Interim sites will be engaged when growth exceeds the capacity of current
permanent structures.
October 3, 1991
148
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE 47
INTERIM FACIUTIES
School
Capacity
Enrollment
Interim Facilities.
Sparkman Interim Sitc
~argarita Interim Sitc
Nicolas Intcrim Sitc.
660 i
442 I
o
()
o
660 i
Located within Sphcrc oi Inilucnce
In addition to Interim campuses, the District uses relocatable facilities at several
permanent facilities, as indicated in the following table. As indicated above, the capacity
generated by the relocatables has been included in the summary of school facilities,
Table 48.
I TABLE 48 I
RELOCATABLE FACILITIES
School Number of Relocatables Capacity Generated
Rancho Day Care 2 75
Vail Day Care 2 90
Rancho Elementary 8 240
Temecula Elementary 11 330
Margarita Middle 8 216
Temecula Valley High 42 1,092
Rancho Vista High 5 155
The capacity of relocatable facilities is a function of grade level and instructional
programs. In addition, not all facilities are of the same size and internal configurations.
All new school structures are required to have 30 percent relocatable facilities. Sparkman
Elementary and Temecula Middle School have relocatable structures, but are not included
in the above table because part of the building that satisfies the requirement looks
identical to the permanent structure; these facilities would only be relocated on a
permanent relocation basis.
October 3, 1991
149
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Student generation rates for the school district were determined through an extensive study
by Trittipo & Associates during the 1989-1990 school year. DweIling counts were
combined with enrollment figures to arrive at the following generation rates:
I TABLE 49 I
STUDENT GENERATION RATES
Grade Levels Generation Factor per Dwelling
Elementary K-5 .36
Middle School 6-8 .20
High School 9-12 .24
The City is currently working with developers to designate school facilities within a
number of planning areas. The following sites are at various stages of acquisition, and
all have been at least tentatively designated. Note, that the sites are identified by
development or plan area.
Elementary Sites
Middle School Sites
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Paloma Del Sol I
Paloma Del Sol II
Paloma Del Sol III
Vmtage Hills
Crown Hills
Murdy Ranch
Winchester Hills
8. Murdy Ranch
9. Warm Springs
High School Sites
10. Roripaugh
11. Murdy Ranch
The District has indicated the potential of obtaining three elementary school sites and one
middle school site outside City limits.
To accommodate anticipated growth, within the City and in the Sphere of Influence, the
District estimates the need for at least two more additional elementary sites and one
middle schools site.
In order to provide new facilities, the District collects school fees per AB181 at the rate
of $1.58 per square foot of residential development and $.26 per square foot of
commerciaIlindustrial development. The District is concerned with the availability of
sufficient funds to accommodate future growth in its boundaries, and recommends that
future development only be approved if school facilities are available and funding sources
for these facilities have been identified.
October 3, 1991
150
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
5.1.4 Libraries
The City of Temecula is a member of the Riverside City and County Public Library
District. This District maintains 25 library facilities throughout Riverside County, in both
incorporated and incorporated areas. In Temecula, a branch facility is located at 27533
Ynez Road. This facility consists of 1,900 square feet of leased storefront space. The
library is open 40 hours per week and contains 18,000 volumes. The District has
indicated that the facility is inadequate for the current population in and near the City of
Temecula.
A 15,000 square foot library facility is currently under construction in the Walt Abraham
Administrative Center, north of Winchester Road. Originally intended to serve the
residents of the unincorporated Murrieta Census District, this County facility, as a result
of Temecula's incorporation, is now located within City boundaries. The library is
scheduled to open in 1992 and will contain 50,000 volumes. The facility is anticipated
to be adequate to serve the current populations of Murrieta and Temecula.
The issue of greatest importance to the Library District is adequate funding to provide for
its adopted library service standards. The standards call for 1.2 volumes and .5 square
feet of library space per capita. However, the District provides only .13 square feet and
.97 volumes per capita county-wide. The cost per capita to maintain adopted library
service standards in 1990 dollars is $18.28. However, the per capita expenditure for
1990-1991 was $11.35. The current per capita expenditure (1991-1992) is $10.65.
Revenue for the County Public Library District is obtained from the County-imposed
Special District tax. However, because the District must compete with other agencies for
the Special District Funding, it is probable that full funding will not be obtained.
Development fees for the County Library System have been imposed on development
projects in a number of communities and cities throughout Riverside County.
Development impact fees represent a source of funding for maintenance and construction
of new facilities.
5.1.5 Parks and Recreation
xx
5.1.6 Health Facilities
xx
October 3, 1991
151
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 36 PUBUC FACIUTIES
October 3, 1991
152
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
5.2 Utilities
5.2.1 Water
Potable water supplied to the City of Temecula and surrounding Sphere of Influence area
is provided via two sources: the Pauba and Temecula Aquifers which flow beneath the
valley and imported water from the Colorado River Aqueduct diverted from the lower
Colorado River at Lake Havasu.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) owns and operates the
Colorado River Aqueduct which has been in operation since 1941 and has the capacity
to deliver in excess of one billion gallons of water per day. MWD purveys water to 27
contracting agencies in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Ventura and
Orange Counties.
Eastern and Western Municipal Water Districts (EMWD and WMWD) are member
agencies of MWD and serve as the wholesale purveyors to Rancho California Water
District (RCWD), the retail purveyor to the Study Area. French Valley and Auld Valley
to the North of the City are served by EMWD which is outside of RCWD's service area.
RCWD also provides water service to the recently incorporated City of Murrieta which
lies just a few miles to the northwest and outside of Temecula's sphere of influence.
Figure 37 shows the existing aqueducts, turnouts and backbone water and reclaimed water
supply lines for the City of Temecula and surrounding area of influence. Generally, this
system consists of a network of transmission and distribution mains, with the associated
storage reservoirs and pump stations for each pressure zone in the system. (Varying
topography requires a number of pressure zones, and each zone requires adequate water
storage and standard water pressure within its system.) The existing mains range from
36" diameter down to 12" diameter as they loop around and through each development
tract. The entire system is fed by the MWD supply turnouts and the RCWD well system.
Major supply mains are located along Winchester Road, Ynez Road, Pauba Road, Rancho
California Road, State Highway 79, Margarita Road, Anza Road, and Jefferson Avenue.
The system is designed to provide at least 2 independent supply points to each internal
tract loop to avoid supply interruption. Storage reservoirs are generally in the 2-3 million
gallon capacity range. Pump stations are sized to meet capacity and pressure head
requirements. Planned future transmission mains are as large as 60" in diameter.
Groundwater Supplv
Rancho California Water District (RCWD) is the local water district responsible for water
distribution. The District has historically sought to optimize on available groundwater
production importing water from EMWD and WMWD only to supplement groundwater
pumping deficiencies. The percentages of ground to import water vary considerably due
October 3, 1991
153
Existing Conditions Report
S3I1JII:>Vd aNY WtlLSAS
NOIl11ar'MLSra 'MtlLVM DNLLSIXtI
'-Sr.'." , '........."..
.~"",:.f.___~~
......~.;.~02.._._
-..--.- .'-'''~.". ......'
......~ ,
1_
'-'-'---""-"'--.'" ~:....,,..,...._---
-.--.;.;,... "
/:"-1 :t.~-':'j~'~_.
-
~'
, .
-~
'~~\'I
~' I
. ,.::... ,__"",-~_..,l''''' ;
,~r--<.;./ ..--,.. .------ '\.....//
"I
,
~
---1
sn~M.
lJOA.I~S~~
uomns un
S~UH~dJd l~lgM.
Wlu80Jd u~ld I~J~U~D
V'lflJHWH~
JO Al!:) ~q.L
~~-;~ w-":
.WS.t..8lldIllDD_
~~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
to yearly rainfall fluctuations. During wet years, as much as 85 percent of the total water
distributed has come from groundwater, while in dry years, groundwater production has
dropped as low as 50 percent of the overall water use. The amount of groundwater used
is regulated by a Recommended Groundwater Production Report issued yearly. In
addition to fluctuations in rainfall, recharge area and location of well pumping capacities
are considered in the report. The District currently has 37 producing wells with a peak
flow delivery capability of 105 cfs.
A limited number of wells have exhibited some excesses of boron and sulfate. This
symptom is easily treated though and does not present serious concern to the District.
Import Supply
As mentioned earlier, RCWD purchases imported water from MWD through EMWD and
WMWD. MWD operates a storage and filtration facility at Lake Skinner, just north of
the City limits. Five MWD aqueducts emanate from the Skinner facilities. Line No. 4
provides treated water while Lines No.1, 2, 3, and 5 provide raw water. RCWD
currently utilizes three 40 cfs turnouts from Line No.4, WR-26, WP-28 and EM-13.
These provide total average annual flow of 33,000 acre feet.
Other Considerations
Based on current available groundwater and imported water facilities, RCWD has an
average annual supply capability of 59,000 acre feet and can meet maximum daily flows
up to 200 cfs. A number of supply options are being investigated to meet long term
increases in demand. These include upgrading existing wells, adding additional wells,
instituting an artificial recharge program using raw water, increased use of reclaimed
water for irrigating golf courses, greenbelts and freeway landscaping and upgrading the
existing MWD facilities. A combination of these improvements will ultimately be
necessary to accommodate future water demands of the City of Temecula and the
surrounding area.
Additionally, RCWD previously calculated future demands to include development of the
Santa Rosa Plateau which is within their jurisdiction. Recently, the Santa Rosa Plateau
has been purchased by Riverside County for use as a nature conservation area. Because
of this, it will be necessary for RCWD to re-evaluate the future water demands of the
Santa Rosa Plateau, downgrading the estimated demand where development would
otherwise have occurred.
Future water system demands are calculated on the basis of assumed land use, residential
density (dwelling units/acre), assumed persons per dwelling unit and estimated domestic
water use per person per day. This latter figure is usually in the range of 100 gallons per
person per day, and the current average population per dwelling unit is 2.47 for this area.
Reclaimed Water
The use of reclaimed water in lieu of potable water offers obvious benefits to the
increasing demands on ground and imported water sources. This approach provides both
a reduction in the reliance on imported water and a method of disposing of treated
wastewater. Both Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and Rancho California
October 3, 1991
155
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Water District (RCWD) are actively contributing to reclaimed water production in and
around the City of Temecula. Information for reclaimed water facilities has been provided
from the 1991 Study by John S. Mark Engineers, Rancho California Water District 1991
Wastewater Master Plan Update and 1990 report by Black and Veatch prepared for
EMWD Wastewater Facilities Master Plan.
There are currently three wastewater treatment plants in use serving the Temecula area.
RCWD operates two plants; one tertiary plant in the Joaquin Ranch serving the Bear
Creek Golf Course, and the Santa Rosa Secondary Plant providing supplemental water to
EMWD's Rancho California plant which produces a combination of tertiary water and
secondary water. The use of secondary treatment water is limited to irrigation in areas
away from public contact such as freeway irrigation. Tertiary treatment water is suitable
for irrigation as well as ponds and other applications which may involve public contact.
The Rancho California treatment plant serves local sod farms in the area as well as
contributing to some of the area detention basins for recharge purposes. There are current
plans to expand the Santa Rosa facility which would eventually provide additional tertiary
water to retail users. EMWD is also planning to expand facilities and when complete all
three plants will be interconnected to handle periodic deficiencies at anyone plant.
Current plans include provisions for reclaimed water to serve Walker Basin, Santa Rosa
Springs, Sylvan Meadows, Temecula Creek Inn, Red Hawk, Vail Meadows, The Sports
Park and the High School. Also being considered for the area is an agreement between
RCWD and EMWD where EMWD would provide wholesale services to RCWD who
would then act as retail purveyor to reclaim water users. Estimates to implement the
system to buildout are forecasted to be approximately $32 million. With these
improvements, the combined capacity of the treatment system for all three plants is
expected to be in excess of 30 mgd. Figure 38 shows existing treatment plants and
reclaimed water utility lines.
Other Considerations
While there are few concerns on meeting existing and anticipated future demands there
has been some discussion of disposing excess discharge. A solution of where and how
to dispose of excess discharge is currently being negotiated now. Alternatives being
considered include discharging into Murrieta Creek or the Santa Ana Basin and/or
discharging into a retention area for purposes of recharge in the Winchester area. These
questions will need to be answered prior to implementation of future expansion plans.
5.2.2 Wastewater
Wastewater facilities for the Study Area are provided by Eastern Municipal Water District
(EMWD). The following information has been compiled from a 1990 study by Black &
Veatch entitled Wastewater Facilities Master Plan prepared for EMWD. Refer to
Figure 39 for the Wastewater Facilities Master Plan.
EMWD's service area within the Study Area is tributary to the Santa Margarita River
Basin and is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control
Board. The Temecula area has been one of EMWD's fastest growing areas in terms of
residential development. Because of this, many improvements are either underway or
planned for in the future. It is important for EMWD to plan for the future treatment of
increased wastewater generated by continuing development.
October 3, 1991
156
Existing Conditions Report
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
.\j....,-~.......
.-, I..'
" -
... ..... -----..----.....-
...:...:
.mr :-:..__
.- ~7.:~~.~~.~4--__-
" .~.-........-~-~
":"-,-~~~=~:--.
,.
':::-1:.~{'
~...'..
..a;:
-
!i~7'.
ii LOa_ kl."
\~i.' VV~"~7 .
"
.-" <-.cf:':".-
--" -1
.-:~.~.
.. ,
..1.'-=-
I.. . ,'----
---
L-__
II] Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Trunk Sewer
The City of
TEMECULA
General Plan Program
(!J~=~
WI CDIII"-l UI"I ..
~-.cJt"'_~....
:."'" d"2Ooo' ~-:-
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
FIGURE 39 WATERWATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
October 3, 1991
158
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
EMWD is currently meeting treatment demand in the Temecula area and is able to treat
4.25 million gallons per day (mgd) at the Rancho California Treatment plant. Expansion
at this facility should yield a treatment capacity of 10 mgd by 1992 with an additional 10
mgd by 1994 (full tertiary treatment). An additional 10 mgd is planned by 2003 yielding
a total of 30 mgd. Wastewater demands for the Temecula area have been projected at 23
mgd by the year 2005, and 54 mgd is the estimated ultimate demand condition for the
system.
A computer modeling system has been developed to monitor and evaluate collection and
treatment of the wastewater system. This is necessary to determine proper pipe sizing and
treatment plant capacities for future conditions. Wastewater flows are estimated based on
projected land use density, and population per unit data. Each land use; e.g., medium
residential, commercial and industrial, is assigned a dwelling unit per acre (du/ac) density
which is multiplied by the number of acres and again by a population factor (2.47 persons
per dwelling unit in this case). The estimated population is then multiplied by an average
wastewater flow per person per day factor. This averages to be approximately 80
gallon/person/day but will fluctuate somewhat with the density.
The wastewater collection system for Temecula consists of a series of gravity trunks and
force mains (are there any?) which generally follow the existing topography and drainage
pattern, terminating at the Rancho California Treatment Plant.
Interceptor trunks collect wastewater flows from local tracts. They are, in turn, collected
by a backbone trunk which flows to a low point. From there a force main carries the
combined flows uphill to the Rancho California Treatment Plant.
5.2.3 Solid Waste
Temecula contracts with Temecula Environmental for solid waste disposal. Temecula
Environmental is owned and operated by CR&R, Inc. of Stanton, California. Waste
Management of Inland Valley also collects trash within the City limits, operating under
. a grandfather agreement which expires in December, 1995. Waste Management only
collects commercial and multi-family trash.
Both haulers transport the City's waste to the EI Sobrante Landfill, located off Temescal
Canyon Road south of Corona, in the unincorporated area of Riverside County. The
landfill is owned and operated by Western Waste Industries, Inc. of Gardena, California.
The EI Sobrante Landfill occupies 160 acres and currently accepts an average of 900
tons/day. The landfill is permitted to accept the following:
1. Septic tank and chemical toilet wastes
2. Approved industrial waste
3. Municipal solid waste
4. Approved agricultural wastes
5. Animal wastes
6. Construction demolition wastes
7. Inert materials
8. Dead animals
9. Tires
10. Egg washing wastes
Hazardous waste is not accepted at this landfill.
October 3, 1991
159
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
The EI Sobrante Landfill has a life expectancy of 11 years and is expected to remain open
until the year 2002. It should be noted that the site has significant possibilities for
expansion, which could increase its life expectancy.
Effective October 1, 1991, the City will implement a curbsite, single-family residence
waste separation program. Each residence will be issued three 60-gallon containers. The
first container will be filled with recyclables such as ferrous metal, newsprint, junk mail,
aluminum, glass, and plastic. The recyclables will be transported to Perris Recycling
Center, located in the City of Perris, for processing. The second container will be filled
with green and garden waste. The green and garden waste will be hauled to ReCyc,
located south of Corona, for composting. The third container will be filled with the
remaining household trash, and hauled to the EI Sobrante Landfill.
5.2.5 Flood Control Facilities
Master Drainage Plan for The Murrieta Creek Area
In March of 1986, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
completed the Master Drainage Plan for the Murrieta Creek Area. The purpose of the
plan was to investigate and evaluate the drainage needs within the Murrieta Creek area
and to propose an economical drainage plan which would provide flood protection for
both existing and future development.
Once implemented, the Master Plan would provide the major flood control facilities
necessary to relieve the area of its most serious flooding problems. The benefits of the
Master Plan facilities include the removal of floodplain status from a large land area
adjacent to Murrieta Creek, the control of severe bank erosion along Murrieta Creek and
its tributaries and the mitigation of severe flooding problems in Old Town Temecula.
The drainage area considered in this plan consists of the 220 square mile drainage area
tributary to Murrieta Creek upstream of its confluence with Temecula Creek. The area
is divided into five major watersheds: the Wildomar Valley, Murrieta Valley, Warm
Springs Valley, Santa Gertrudis Valley and the Temecula Valley, all of which comprise
the Murrieta Creek Watershed. Portions of the Warm Springs Valley, Santa Gertrudis
Valley and Temecula Valley watersheds lie within the Temecula City limits or sphere of
influence. .
The recommended improvements consist of the channelization of Murrieta Creek and its
major Tributaries and include several concrete-lined open channels and a small network
of underground storm drains. The proposed system will carry runoff through the rapidly
developing Murrieta Creek Valley, to outlet at the valley's south end, where Murrieta
Creek and Temescal Creek confluence to form the Santa Margarita River.
Murrieta Creek Area DrainaS!e Plan
The Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan was prepared through the merger of the Master
Drainage Plan for The Murrieta Creek Area, dated March, 1986, and the Master Drainage
Plan for the Wildomar Area, dated August 1980. This Area Drainage Plan for controlling
October 3, 1991
160
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
flood and drainage problems in the Murrieta Creek Area concludes that certain flood and
drainage facilities are critically needed for an orderly and economical development of the
area.
This plan consists of the improvement of Murrieta Creek, as well as the construction of
numerous side drains. The facilities proposed by the plan range in size from a 225 foot
wide, 14 foot deep Murrieta Creek channel designed to control more than 38,000 cfs, to
a 36 inch reinforced concrete pipe designed to convey 50 cfs. Only facilities 36 inches
or greater in diameter are included as part of this Area Drainage Plan. Drains smaller
than 36 inches are to be considered as a part of land development activities and will be
required as necessary.
The drainage problems and the proposed solutions to those vary widely within the
watershed. Therefore, in an effort to fairly apportion the drainage fee, the overall
drainage area has been divided into five sub-watersheds. These five watersheds are
identical to those identified in the Master Drainage Plan for the Murrieta Creek Area.
Each of the five sub-watersheds has a fee associated with it that is more representative
of its flow contribution and benefits realized.
It should be noted that the proposed Murrieta Creek, along with the Santa Gertrudis and
Warm Springs Channels, are the only proposed improvements that are considered "major
facilities" and are supported by payment of drainage fees within each sub-watershed.
However, drainage fees collected from both the Santa Gertrudis Valley and Warm
Springs, besides being used for the Santa Gertrudis and Warm Springs Channels, are for
the improvement of only that portion of Murrieta Creek below their confluences. On the
other hand, drainage fees collected in the Temecula Valley sub-watershed are intended for
use over the entire length of Murrieta Creek.
All of the other proposed drains are regarded as "local facilities" and are to be funded by
payment of drainage fees collected in the sub-watersheds in which they are located. The
distribution of fees to "major" and "local" facilities is shown in Table 50.
TABLE 50
MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
FEE DISTRIBUTION
Sub. Watershed Fee Per Percentage Applied Major Facilities
Acre Toward Local
Facilities M.C. S.G. W.S.
Wildomar Val $4,462 56.97% 43.03% 0 0
Murrieta Val $3,503 42.58% 57.42% 0 0
Temecula Val $1,970 4.02% 95.98% 0 0
Santa Gertrudis Val $1,023 3.92% 43.29% 52.79% 0
Warm Springs Val $ 530 3.23% 77.00% 0 19.77%
* Murrieta Creek, Santa Gertrudis Creek, and Warm Springs Creek Channels, respectively.
The above fees are those set forth by Amendment No. 1 to the Murrieta Creek Area
Drainage Plan, Resolution No. 90-059 adopted January 23, 1990.
October 3, 1991
161
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Draina2e Facilities
Major channels and storm drains considered Regional Facilities are under the jurisdiction
of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District as opposed to
those storm drain facilities that are locally controlled and are the responsibility of the City
of Temecula or, in some cases the Riverside County Transportation Department.
Existing facilities were identified through the use as built drawings, atlas maps, specific
plan documents and field reconnaissance. Portions of the City are served by storm drains
and catch basins constructed as the result of development which has occurred over the
years. The majority of these facilities are considered local. The majority of the regional
facilities, as proposed in the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan, remain unconstricted at
this time due to lack of funds or regulatory permits.
Re2ional Flood Control Facilities
The following information on existing Regional Flood Control Facilities was obtained
from the City of Temecula, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and field reconnaissance.
Santa Gertrudis Creek - Currently, Santa Gertrudis Creek is fully improved from Murrieta
Creek upstream to Ynez Road. Above Ynez Road, to the easterly end of the Highlands
Business Park only the north slope is constructed. These improvements include:
concrete-lined trapezoidal channel from Murrieta Creek to Ynez Road and concrete slope
protection from Ynez Road to the northerly end of the Highlands Business Park.
Downstream of Ynez Road, this facility has adequate capacity to convey lOO-year storm
flows to Murrieta Creek. Upstream of Ynez Road, the facility does not have capacity to
contain 100-year storm flows and, therefore, the adjacent properties will be subject to
flooding during a 100-year event.
Pechanl!a Creek - Pechanga Creek is improved along its northerly bank from the
confluence with Temecula Creek upstream to Wolf Valley Road (via Eduardo). These
improvements include rivetted concrete slope protection along the north bank of the
channel between the limits described above.
While this facility protects developments along its north bank, the limited improvements
do not provide flood protection for the Temecula Creek Golf Club and its amenities.
Murrieta Creek - Murrieta Creek currently remains a natural watercourse running from the
northerly City limits, Cherry Avenue, south to the Santa Margarita River. Even though
Murrieta Creek is unimproved, it must be discussed as a regional facility because it acts
as the major outlet for those sub-watersheds named in the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage
Plan which affect the City of Temecula.
In its unimproved state, Murrieta Creek lacks the capacity to convey 100-year storm flows
through the valley. As evidenced on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps discussed above, the
City of Temecula can expect severe flood damage along Murrieta Creek during and after
a lOO-year event.
October 3, 1991
162
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Primarv Flood Control Facilities - The following information on Primary Flood Control
facilities was obtain from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District, Private Developers and field reconnaissance. Primary facilities presently existing
in the area consist primarily of highway culverts and bridges on Interstate l5, and
facilities built in conjunction with commercial and industrial developments.
Rancho California Road Drain - Running from Murrieta Creek to Business Park Drive,
this facility consists of a series of grass-lined open channel, arched plate culverts, 60"
RCP in Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive aid a concrete-lined trapezoidal
channel ending in a debris basin. This system is considered adequate for conveyance of
100-year storm flows.
Une A - Developer constructed, Une A is an unlined trapezoidal channel running from
Murrieta Creek to Interstate l5. The existing cross-section is inadequate for the
conveyance of the 100-year storm.
Above Interstate 15, Une A is known as Empire Creek and is fully improved, with the
exception of a small reach between the Temecula Town Center and Moraga Road, from
the freeway to Butterfield Stage Road. These improvements include: unlined trapezoidal
channel, in levee condition, from Interstate 15 to Ynez Road, triple 96 inch cast-in-place
pipe form Ynez Road to the easterly boundary of the Temecula Town Center, unimproved
natural channel from the Temecula Town Center to Moraga Road and a combination of
lined and unlined trapezoidal channels and reinforced concrete boxes from Moraga Road
to Butterfield Stage Road.
The above improved facilities are considered adequate for protection against lOO-year
flooding.
Une C - Developer constructed, Une C is an unlined trapezoidal channel running from
Murrieta Creek to the confluence with Une C-l, and a 12' x 5' reinforced concrete box
from Une C-l to Interstate 2l5. The existing cross-section is inadequate for the
conveyance of the 100-year storm.
The extension of Line C above Interstate 15 consists of a concrete-lined trapezoidal
channel of varying cross-section and a double l4.0 foot by 5.0 foot reinforced concrete
box. At Ynez Road, the reinforced concrete box transitions to a double 10.0 foot by 5.0
foot. Above Ynez Road, an earthen levee runs along the northerly side of the watercourse
to Margarita Road.
All of the above improved facilities currently have capacity to convey 100-year storm
flows.
Line C-1 - Developer constructed, Line C-l consists of a 54-inch and double 36-inch
reinforced concrete pipe running from the confluence with Line C to Interstate 2l5. The
existing cross-section is inadequate for the conveyance of the lOO-year storm.
The extension of Line C-l above Interstate 15 consists of a concrete-lined trapezoidal
channel running from the freeway to Ynez Road. With a l4.0 foot base width and
varying depth, the channel is designed to convey 100-year storm flows, after the
construction of the levee on the extension of Line C, from Ynez Road to the Freeway.
October 3, 1991
163
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Une 200 - Running easterly in Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Une 200 consists of 36 and
42 inch reinforced concrete pipe. Line 200 is considered adequate to convey 100-year
storm flows.
Une 600 - Running westerly in Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Une 600 consists of
reinforced concrete pipe ranging from 90 to 36 inches in diameter. Line 600 is
considered adequate to convey 100-year storm flows.
Local Draina2e Facilities
Local drainage facilities consisting mainly of underground closed conduits have been
constructed in the many areas where residential and commercial development has taken
place. These facilities are numerous and considered adequate for the conveyance of their
particular design flows.
5.2.6 Telecommunications
General Telephone Company (GTE) provides telephone services to all businesses and
residences in the City of Temecula. GTE maintains over l7,500 lines of service, a
number of which are Fiber Optic and high circuitry lines.
GTE experiences an average increase in service demand of 2,300 lines yearly. Service
demand is calculated based on the number of units for residential development and square
footage for commercial development. As a public utility GTE is required to accommodate
all requests for telephone services. Facilities expansions are funded by GTE.
October 3, 1991
164
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
5.3 Energy
5.3.1 Electricity
Southern California Edison supplies electricity to the Study Area. SCE's main substation
is located on Mira Lorna. The nearest substation is located on the corner of Rancho
California Road at Monte d'Oro.
Edison is a public utility and therefore functions on demand. Extensions for electrical
service to new developments are governed by rules established by the Public Utilities
Commission of California. The hierarchy of establishing electrical power lines from
generation stations to customers is as follows: transmission line, sub-transmission line,
service line.
SCE maintains both overhead and underground lines ranging from l2,000 to 115,000
volts. Average consumption for residential use are 800 kilowatts per hour (kWh) in
winter months, and 1,100 kWh in summer months. Commercial consumption rates range
from 200 to 10,000 kWh per hour.
5.3.2 Natural Gas
Natural gas is provided to the Study Area by the Southern California Gas Company.
Existing facilities include plastic and steel gas lines located throughout the Study Area.
Residents located in the Study Area that are not serviced by SCG utilize bottled propane
or butane fuel.
SCG operates a division that covers the entire Inland Empire area. Current consumption
rates cannot be further disaggregated by area, i.e., the Study Area or the City of
Temecula. An analysis of gas consumption rates in the Inland Empire, however, reveals
increasing rates due to continued development in the area. During the period 1989-1990,
gas main and service increased in terms of footage by 4.55 and 5.09 percent respectively.
As development continues in the area, the Gas Company will continue to expand its
facilities to meet new customer demands.
October 3, 1991
165
Existing Conditions Report
CHAPTER SIX
References
CITY OF TEMEcULA
General Plan Program
Chapter Six
REFERENCES
Air Qualitv Handbook for Preparinl! Environmental Impact Reports. South Coast Air
Quality Management District, April, 1987.
Campus Verdes Specific Plan No. 1/EIR No. 348. July l8, 1991.
Citv of Temecula Land Use Inventorv. June l8, 1979.
Citv of TemeculalRancho California Area Information Packet. prepared by the Riverside
County Planning Department Demographics Section, December, 1989.
Communi tv Economic Profile for Temecula Riverside Co.. California. prepared in
conjunction with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce.
Comprehensive General Plan. Third Edition. County of Riverside, December 22, 1987.
Draft Air Qualitv Manal!ement Plan. Southern California Association of Governments,
December, 1990.
Draft Citv of Temecula Land Use Inventorv. prepared by The Lightfoot Planning Group,
October 199O.
Margarita Village Specific PlanlEIR No. 199. September 6, 1988.
Rancho California ULI Advance Information Panel Service Kit, Executive Proiect
Description. and Appendix. sponsored by Rancho California Development
CompanylBedford Properties, 1988.
Recency and Character of Faultinl! Alonl! the Elsinore Fault Zone in Southern Riverside
Countv. California. Special Report 131. California Division of Mines and
Geology, 1977.
Seismic Safety and Safety General Plan Elements Technical Report. Riverside County.
Soil Survey. Western Riverside Area California. United States Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service, November 1971.
Southwest Area Communitv Plan Final EIR No. 217. March 1989.
Summary of 1988 Air Qualitv Data - Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants. California Air
Resources Board, 1988.
October 4, 1991
166
Existing Conditions Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Temecula Communi tv Plan Task Force Plan. Old Town Temecula Merchants Association,
Old Town Temecula Museum Historical Committee, Temecula Town Association,
and Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, March 7, 1988.
Temecula Remembered, Carole- Henderson- Wright.
TEM'()l IMEA-MST
October 3, 1991
167
Existing Conditions Report
APPENDIX A
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Worksheets
INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
9 DATE: Sep.l) I
I'ROJECf: Temccula Generall'L,n CircuL,lion C1emcnl
LOCATION: Rancho ualifornia Rd. & Dusin.,... Park Dr.
Sccn.uio:
Exisling Condilions
10.
2114
AM Peak Hour I'M I'eak Hour Type of Area: NON-COD
I~'ne Ilcavy ConOidinll
C.'p;,dIY Volullle V/C C.11~,d'y Volulllc V/C Wid'h Veh. Grn.Jc ('arkinll Bus I'cdcslrians
Movcmenls L.1I1C (vl,h~) (vl,h!:) (H) (~IIV) (%) (Nm) (Nil)
NOR" mOUND
Thru 1 1700 11 1 . 1700 1 1 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Rillhl Turn 1 1445 63 o . 1445 112 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
LeH Turn 0 0 3 0 0 17 1 . 0 0.0 0.0
sounmOUND
Thru 1 1700 4 1 1700 4 4 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1445 7 0 1445 3 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 11 1 . 0 65 4 0 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thru 1 1700 143 8 1700 338 20 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 7 0 1445 24 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
LcfITurn 1 1615 I 3 . 1615 8 0 12 0.0 0.0
WES1l30UND
Thru 1 1700 322 19 . 1700 209 12 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 143 U . 1445 18 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
Lef, Turn 1 1615 114 7 1615 146 9 . 12 0.0 0.0
1CU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
24
A
34
A
INTERSECfION CAP ACITY UTILIZATION
14 DA'rn: Scp-91
PROJECf: Tcmccula Gencrlll Plan Cireulalion C1emenl
LOCA nON: Margarila Rd. &: Solana Way
Scenario:
Exisling Condilionl
10'
1144
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type of Area: NON-COD
Lane Heavy Connieling
Capacily Volume VIC Capacily Volume V/C Widlh Veh. Grade Parking Bus Pcdeslrians
Movements Lane (vpha) (vphg) (ft) (%HV) ('Jl.) (Nm) (Nb)
NORTHBOUND
Thru 1 1287 0 1 1347 6 2 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 9 0 0 17 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeH Turn 1 1599 248 16 . 1599 203 13 . 12 2.0 0.0
SOl.1TI-lBOUND
Thru 1 1295 2 5 · 1334 7 3 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 60 o . 0 27 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 1 1599 0 0 1599 0 0 12 2.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thru 1 1683 72 4 1683 279 17 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1431 103 0 1431 341 o . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Left Turn 1 1599 14 3 . 1599 42 3 12 2.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thru 1 1515 252 17 . 1515 1.5-4 10 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 1 1599 15 1 1599 30 3 . 12 2.0 0.0
ICU ('Jl.)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
41
A
36
A
Noles:
1. . Indicales erilicallane vie
2. Turning volumes are added 10 Ihru volume where Ihere is
no separale lurning lane
3. Nm - Number of Maneuven per Hour
4. Nb. Number of busco per Hour
5. Three percenl minimum areen 10 cycle ralio ....umed for crilicallefl-lurn movemenl
WILBUR $MITII ASSOCIAlE
17
INTERSEcrION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: s..'P.\l1
PROJECT: Temenlla General Plan Cimllalion E1emenl
LO~TlON: JeCrenon A"". & OvcrL,nd Rd.
SccMrio:
ExislinC Condilions
10:
200}2
AM Pc.,k Hour I'M I'cnk Hour Type or Arcn: NON-COD
I ",nc llc:.vy eonnklinc
Capacily Volume V/C C"p'lCilY Volun.e V/C Width Vch. Grade I'arking Uus I'edcstn.,...
MuvcnlcnSs I.,nc (vl'h~) (vph~) (ft) ('hollV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORTlIUOUND
Thnl 2 3366 392 12 3366 836 25 . 12 lO 0.0 0 0
Riehl Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 o · 0 0.0 0.0 0
Len Turn I 1615 053 3 . 161.5 057 4 12 0.0 0.0
SOU1HOOUND
Thnl 2 3366 053.5 16 . 3366 641 19 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Riehl Turn I 1445 83 o . 1445 057 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
Len Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0
EASTI)OUND
Thnl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn I 1431 42 0 1431 72 2 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Len Turn 1 1599 26 3 . 1599 92 6 . 12 2.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thnl 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lerl Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
ICU (%)-
I..EVELOFSERVICE -
22
A
31
A
20
INTERSEcrION CAP ACITY UTILIZATION
DAlE: Sep-91
PROJECT: Tcm<<ula General P!:In C'ImI!:1lion Elemenl
LOCATION: Fronl SI. & Main SL
Scenario:
Ezisling Condilions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type: or Area: NONoCOD
u,nc Hcnvy Connklinc
Capacily Volume V/C Capacity Volume V/C W"llh Veh. Grade Parking OUI Pedeslrians
Movements u,ne (vphg) (vphg) (rl) (%HV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORmOOUND
Thnl I 1499 302 23 . 1490 268 22 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 6 o . 0 6 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 0 0 41 3 0 51 3 . 0 0.0 0.0
SOUTIIDOUND
Th", 1 1494 220 17 1491 439 3.5 · 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 31 0 0 80 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
LdlTurn 0 0 4 o . 0 10 1 0 0.0 0.0
EASTI)OUND
Th", 1 1700 5 3 1700 5 6 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 21 0 14015 98 0 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
LeCl Turn 0 0 54 3 . 0 92 05 . 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Th", 1 1700 10 1 . 1700 12 3 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 6 o . 1445 28 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
Len Turn 0 0 \I 1 0 J9 2 0 0.0 0.0
10:
2113
ICU (%)-
I..EVELOFSERVICE -
27
A
47
A
Noles:
1. . Indicales crilical !:Ine vie .
2. Turning voIumea arc added 10 Ih", volume where Ihen: is
no separale lurninllanc
3. Nm . Number or Maneuvers pc:.- Hour
4. Nb . Number or buses per Hour
5. Three peR'....1 minin.um green 10 <yde ralio lIUumed ror mlicallc:rHurn _menl
WILBUR SMm~ ASSOCIATES
21
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Scp.') I
PROJECT: Tem<<ul~ Genel'llll'L,n CilTulalion Elc:mc:nt
LOCA110N: 1.15 S.Il. Ramp &< SR 79 (SoUl")
Scc:nario:
Exisling Co",lilions
AM Peak Hour PM I'e"k Hour Type or Arc:a: NON-cnD
(..,nc IleaV)' COIlnidin&
CapIKily Volume V/C C,,,",rily Volume V/C Widlh Veh. Grade P~rkin& nus Pedc:stri:lna
Movements lane ( vphg) (vl'hg) (n) ('JtIIV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NOR11~BOUND
ThI1l 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Ri&hl Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
l.c:ft Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
SOU11.iIl0UND
ThI1l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
RiKhl Turn 1 1330 75 6 1330 49 4 10 2.0 0.0 0
l.c:nTurn 1 IS'J9 I'''} 12 . IS'JIJ 27S 17 . 12 2.0 0.0
EASTUOUND
TI.11I 1 144S 131 13 . 1456 381 3S . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 sa o . 0 134 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
l.c:CITurn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
ThI1l 1 ISIS 293 19 ISIS IS2 10 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
l.c:nTurn 1 IS99 278 17 . IS'J9 189 12 . 12 2.0 0.0
11).
2079
leu (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
43
A
64
8
22
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Sc:p-91
pROmCT: Temec:ula Genc:ral Plan CilTuL,lion E1emenl
LOCA 110N: I-IS N.n. Ramp I< SR 79 (Soulh)
Scenario:
Exisling Condiliona
10:
2080
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type: oC Area: NON.CDD
Uane Hc:.,V)' Connieling
Capacity Volume VIC CaP.,c:ily Volume vie Wldlh Veh. Gl'lIde Parkin& Bus PedC:SIri:lna
Movements une (vphg) (vphg) (ft) (%HV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORllinOUND
ThI1l 0 0 0 o · 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1330 79 6 · 1330 147 11 . 10 2.0 0.0 0
LeCI Turn 1 1599 61 4 IS99 SI 3 12 2.0 0.0
SOU1l-lBOUND
ThI1l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Ri&hl Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
l.c:CITurn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 -
EASTBOUND
ThI1l 1 ISIS 308 20 ISIS 590 39 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCt Turn 1 1599 22 3 . IS99 G6 4 . 12 2.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
ThI1l 1 1442 510 S2 . 1406 290 39. 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 242 o . 0 264 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCI Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
ICU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
61
B
Sol
A.
Noles:
1. . Indica I,," rrilicallane vie
2. Turning volumes are added 10 Ihna volume where Ihere is
no scpal'llle lurning lane
3. Nm - Number of Maneuvc:n per Hour
4. Nb - Number of buaes per Hour
S. Three pe:rcent minimum green to cyc:1e "'lIio assumed Cor rrilicalleCt-Iurn movemenl
WILBUR SMITIi ASSOCIA1CS
23
INTERSEcrlON CAPACITY UTILlZA TION
D^'IU:
PROJEcr:
Loa TION:
Sep.YI
TeR1<<ula Genernl Plan CireuL,tion Element
Front SI. k S.,nlinKO 1(01.
Stt....rio:
Existin!: Conditions
^M Pctk Hour I'M I'e"k Hour Type or ^rea: NON-COD
I...ne Ilc:ovy ConOiding
Capacity Volun.e VlC Capleily Volume V/C Width Veh. Grn.Jc Parking Dus I'edesl""ns
Movements u.ne (vrhg) (vphg) (rl) ('il>HV) ('il>) (Nm) (Nb)
NORllIDOUND
Thru 1 1683 288 17 . 1683 251 15 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1431 48 o . 1431 109 0 12 2.0 0.0 0
Lert Turn 0 0 2 0 0 I o . 0 0.0 0.0
SOU11-lDOUND
Thru 1 1460 191 17 1444 444 45 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 1 0 0 0 o · 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lert Turn 0 0 5Y 4 . 0 199 14 0 0.0 0.0
Et\STBOUND
Thru 1 1287 0 0 1287 0 o . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 1 0 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lert Turn 0 0 1 o . 0 2 0 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thru 1 1683 0 3 . 1683 0 4 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1330 125 2 . 1330 95 0 10 2.0 0.0 0
Lefl Turn 0 0 56 3 0 74 4 . 0 0.0 0.0
10'
1223
ICU ('il>)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE.
26
A
49
A
24
INTERSEcrION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Scp-91
PROJEcr: Temccula General Plan Circulation E1emenl
LOCA nON: u paz SI. &. HighWllY 79 (Soulh)
Scenario:
Emling Con.Jilions
10:
1006
AM PClIk Hour PM Pak Hour Type or Area: NON-CDD
Lane Hc.ovy ConOieling
Capacily Volume VlC Capacily Volume V/C Wadlh Veh. Grade Parking Bus Pc:dcsI",,1II
Movements Lane (vphC> (vphC> (rt) ('il>HV) ('If>) (Nm) (Nb)
NORnIBOUND
Thru 1 1368 6 1 1373 3 1 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 11 0 0 5 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
LcJ'ITurn 1 1599 43 3 . 1599 24 3 . 12 2.0 0.0
SOlJl1-lBOUND
Thru 1 1292 1 4 . 1325 10 5 · 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 52 o . 0 51 o · 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lert Turn 1 1599 22 1 1599 SO 3 12 2.0 0.0 -
Et\STBOUND
Thru 1 lS05 397 28 lS05 757 53 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 18 0 0 34 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lert Turn 1 1599 31 3 . 1599 69 4 12 2.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thru 1 1504 639 45 . 1480 479 38 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 33 o . 0 as 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn I 1599 3 0 1599 7 3 . 12 2.0 0.0
ICU ('il>).
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
5,5
A
64
8
Noles:
1. . Indicalcs crilicallane vIe
2. Turnin& volumca are added 10 thru volume where thc:rc is
no teparate lurnin& IllJIC
3. Nm - Numbc:ror MancuYCrS pc:I' Hour
4. Nb - Number or buses pc:I' Hour
5. Three percent minimum &"",n to cycle ....110 ...umcd rOl' critical left-Iurn movement
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCU\TES
25
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Scp-91
PROJl;CT: Temc:c:ula Generall'bn Cirrulalion l;lemenl
LOCATION: Margarita Rd. &. Santiago Rd.
Scenario:
Exisling Condilion.
ID:
1161
AM Pc.,k Hour I'M Pc.,k Hour Type or Area: NON.COD
L..,ne II",,")' ConOirling
Capo,ri.y Volume vIe C"'),'lCiIY Volume VIC Widlh Veh. Gr-IIk I'arking Ous Pedestria...
Movements Lane (vphg) (vllh!:) (Ct) (%IIV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORlllUOUND
Thru 1 ISIS 24 2 ISIS 108 7 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lefl Turn 1 1615 4 3 . 1615 12 3 . 12 0.0 0.0
SOU1l-l00UND
Thru 1 1683 59 4 . 1683 118 11 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1251 3 o . 1251 3 o . 8 0.0 0.0 0
Lerl Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 15-16 4 0 1546 8 0 14 0.0 0.0 0 0
Left Turn 1 1615 7 3 . 1615 12 3 . 1Z 0.0 0.0
WESTIlOUND
Thru 1 1100 0 o . 1700 0 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1445 0 o . 1445 0 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
lCU (%)-
LEVEL Of SERVICE -
.10
A
17
A
26
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZA TYON
DATE: Sep-91
PROJECT: Temocula General Plan Cimalalion Elc:mcnl
LOCATION: Marprila Rd." De Portola Rd.
Scenario:
Existing Condilions
ID'
2007
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type or Area: NON-CnD
Lane Hea")' ConOicting
Capacil)' Volume VIC Capacil)' Volume V/C Widlh Veh. Grade Parking nus Pedeslria...
Moycmenls Lane (vphg) ( vphg) (ft) (%HV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NOR1l-IOOUND
Thru 1 1100 205 12 . 1100 84 5 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1445 2 o . 1445 I 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 1 1615 9 1 1615 4 3 . 12 0.0 0.0
SOU1l-l00UND
Thru 1 1100 111 10 1100 as 5 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1445 28 0 1445 3 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
Lefl Turn 1 1615 1 3 . 1615 1 0 12 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thru 1 1100 1 0 1700 1 0 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 5 0 1445 6 0 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Lefl Turn 1 1615 5 3 · 1615 23 3 . 12 0.0 0.0
WESTIlOUND
Thru 1 1100 1 o . 1100 1 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 1 o . 1445 1 o . 1Z 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 1 1615 1 0 1615 1 0 12 0.0 0.0
lCU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
18
A
11
A
NOles:
1. . Indicales crilirallane vIe
2. Turning voIulDCI are added 10 Ihl'll volume where lhere is
no separale lurninglane
3. Nm . Number 0{ Maneuven per Hour
4. Nb - Number 0{ buses per Hour
5. Three percenl minimum green 10 cycle ralio assumed for erilirallcft-Iurn movemenl
WILBUR SMI1li ASSOCIATES
INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
27
DATE:
I'ROmCf:
LOCATION:
Scp.lJI
Tem<<ul" Gener:" l'l"n Cil'<ul"lion Elemenl
rata I{d. & Slale Roule 79 (S)
S<<nario:
Emling Condilions
11):
1018
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type oe Area: NON-cBD
I..,ne 11..,,"Y Connkling
Capacily Volume V/C C'pacily Volume V/C Widlh Veh. Gradc Parking Bus Pedcsln.,ns
Movements I..,ne (yphg) (yphg) (el) (%IIV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORnmOUND
Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 46 0 14-15 n 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
Leet Turn 1 1615 375 23 . 1615 220 14 . 12 0.0 0.0
SOUTHOOUND
Thru 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thru 1 1700 189 11 1700 397 23 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RiJ:hl Turn I 1157 228 0 1157 456 o . 8 0.0 0.0 0 0
Leel Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
W~OUND
Thru 1 1530 330 21 . 1530 231 15 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lerl Turn 1 1615 63 4 1615 94 6 . 12 0.0 0.0
ICU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
45
A
42
A
28
I NTERS ECf ION CAP ACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Sep-91
PROJECf: Temecula General Plan Circulalion E1emenl
LOCA nON: Margarila Rood & Slale Roule 79 (S)
Scenario:
Exisling Condilions
10:
1011
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type oe Area: NON-COD
une Hca"Y Connicting
Capacily Volume V/C Capacily Volume VIC Widlh Veh. Grade Parking Ous Pedeslrians
Movements une ( vphg) (yphg) (ft) (%HV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORn~OOUND
Thru 1 1700 57 3 . 1700 28 2 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 9 o · 1445 4 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
Leel Turn 1 1615 7 0 1615 24 1 12 0.0 0.0
SOUTHOOUND
Thru 0 0 83 0 0 n 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 SO 0 1445 23 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
Leel Turn 1 1615 44 3 . 1615 62 4 . 12 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thru 1 1700 110 6 1700 293 17 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 1 1445 54 0 14-15 6 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
LefITurn 1 1615 113 7 . 1615 36 2 12 0.0 0.0
WES11l0UND
Thru 1 1700 157 15 . 1700 184 11 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 46 o . 1445 29 0 12 0.0 0.0 0
Lefl Turn 1 1615 11 1 1615 3 3 . t2 0.0 0.0
ICU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
28
A
2S
A
Noles:
1. . Indicales erilicallanc vie
2. Turning volumes an: added 10 Ihru volume where Ihen: is
no ICpllrate lurninglane
3. Nm - Number 0{ Maneuvcn per llour
4. Nb . Number 0{ buses per Hour
5. Three percent minimum creen to ~Ie ralio DIIumcd ror crilicallcCl-lurn movement
WILBUR SMITI~ ASSOCIATES
30
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE;
I'ROJECr;
LOCATION:
Scp.IJl
Temecula General I'L", Circulalion Elem"nl
Margarila Ihl. & 1.., Serena Way
Scenario:
Exislillg COII...ilions
II)'
2115
AM I'e.,k I lour PM I'eak Hour Type 0( Area: NON.CDD
1.,"" 11""vy Connielin!:
Cap"cily Volume vIe C.'p"cilY Vulum" VIC Wi"'th Veh. Gra"'e I'arkin!: lIu. I'co.l.,.l""n.
Moven.ent. I..,ne (vl'hg) (vl'h!:) (ft) (%IIV) (%) (Nn.) (Nb)
NORTI180UND
Th", 1 1700 87 5 . 1700 217 13 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 H~5 8S o . 1~~5 374 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
SOUTI1DOUND
Th", 2 3-100 151 . 3-100 221 7 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn I 1615 17 3 . 1615 68 . . 12 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Th", 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lerl Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Th", 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn I H~5 273 18 . 1445 71 I 12 0.0 0.0 0
I.cllTurn I 1615 39 2 1615 2:10 I~ . 12 0.0 0.0
ICU (%).
LEVEL OF SERVICE.
26
A
31
A
31
INTERSECTION CAP ACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Scp-91
PROJECT: Temccula General Plan Circulation Elemenl
LOCATION: Marg.rila R.... '" Paubll Rd.
Scenario:
Exisling Conditions
10:
1159
AM PClk Hour PM Peak Hour Type oC A."..: NON-CUD
Lane Heavy Connicling
Capaci.y Volume VIC Capacily Volume VIC Width Veh. Grade Parking Dus Pco.lcsuians
Movemenls lane ( vphg) ( vphg) (rl) (%IIV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORTllDOUND
Thru 1 1683 28 2 1683 95 6 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1257 1 0 1257 6 0 8 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 I o . 0 I o . 0 0.0 0.0
SOUTI-lDOUND
Thru 2 3175 59 3 . 3111 101 7 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 36 o . 0 103 o . 12 0.0 0.0 0
LeCI Turn 1 1615 1 0 1615 6 0 12 0.0 0.0
EASTDOUND
Thru I 1301 0 1 1370 29 7 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 I 0 0 25 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 17 1 . 0 42 3 . 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Th", 1 1301 0 I . 1362 29 8 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 11 o . 0 <18 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Lerl Turn 0 0 1 0 0 31 2 0 0.0 0.0
lCU (%).
LEVEL OF SERVICE.
5
A
18
A
Noles:
1. . In"'icales erilic:allane vIe
2. Turning volumes are .dded 10 lh", volume where Ihere is
no K'parale lurning lane
3. Nm . Number or Maneuvcrs pcr I lour
.. Nb. Number 0( buses per I lour
5. Thn:c perren I minimum green 10 cycle ralio .ssumed Cor crili....llcr...urn moven",nl
WILBUR SMI11I ASSOCIA TE.S
33
INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Scp-'ll
"Romer: Temccula General Plan Circulalion E1emenl
LOCA nON: Winehcaler I~d. &. Nirol3. Rd.
Scen3rio:
Exi'ling Condilion.
10'
1201
AM Peak Hour I'M I'c.,k Hour TYJIC oC Area: NON-COD
L.,ne 11c:.,vy Connieling
Capacily Volume VIC Capacity Volume VIC Widlb Veh. Gr:HIe "arking Ilus l'c.Jcslri.,ns
Movements l..1ne (vphg) ('1'hg) (n) (%IW) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NORTIIDOUND
Thru 1 1666 269 16 1666 621 37 . 12 4.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 124S 56 .0 124S 128 o . 8 2.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
SOUiHOOUND
Thru I 14\19 447 30 . 1499 418 28 12 4.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 1 161S 52 3 1615 100 6 . 12 0.0 0.0
EAS'roOUND
Thru 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCt Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1245 80 3 1245 6J 0 8 2.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 1 1487 156 10 . 14117 75 5 . 10 2.0 0.0
lCU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
40
A
49
A
35
INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
DATE: Scp-'l1
PROJEer: Tcmcculll Generall'L,n CircuL,tion Elemenl
LOCATION: P31a Rd. & Rainbow C.nyon Rd.
Sc:cnario:
Existing Conditions
10:
2098
AM Pc.ak Hour PM J'cnk Hour Type oC Area: NON-COD
l..1nc Heavy Connid;ng
Cap...cily Volume VIC Capaclly Volume V/C Widlh Veh. Grade Parking Ous Pcdcatrians
Movements Lane (vphg) (vphg) (Cl) (%HV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NOR1l-IOOUND
Thru 1 1530 412 27 · IS30 268 18 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn I 161S 11 1 161S IS 3 . 12 0.0 0.0
SOUiHOOUND
Thru 1 1700 2O.S 12 1700 396 23 . 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 1 1445 S8 0 1445 82 o · 12 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
EAS'roOUND
Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 1 1445 8 0 1445 36 2 12 0.0 0.0 0 0
LeCl Turn 1 1615 56 3 . 1615 121 7 . 12 0.0 0.0
WESTIlOUND
Thru 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
lCU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
30
.
33
A
Notes:
I. . Indicates erilica! lane vIe
2. Turning voluma are acldcd 10 thru volume where Ihere is
no scpllrale turninc lane
3. Nm - Number of Maneuvcn per Hour
4. Nb . Number of bllSCl per Hour
5. Three percent minimum green 10 cycle ralio ....umcd Cor erilalleCt-turn movement
WILBUR SMm~ ASSOCIA res
37
INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILlZA TION
UATE:
I'ROJECT:
LOCATION:
Scpolll
Tem<<ula Generall'lan Circulation Element
Mumela Hol Springs Rd. & 1-215 SO Ramps
Scenario:
Existing Conditions
10.
2116
AM "<.,Ie J lour pM Peak Hour Type of Arc." NON-COD
lAne Heavy ConmCling
Capacity Volume V/C Capacity Volume V/C Width Veh. Grade "'Irking Ous Pc:<lestrians
Movements lAne ( vphll) ( vphg) (ft) (%HV) ('Xl) (Nm) (Nb)
NORTI100UND
Thnl 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
SOUTIlOOUND
Thnl 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Righi Turn I 1388 74 5 1388 64 5 11 2.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 1 1551 110 7 . 1551 156 10 . II 2.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thrv 1 1512 184 12 1504 512 36 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 0 0 2 0 0 26 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
LeCl Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thru 1 1438 2.36 2S . 1415 276 3S 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 120 8 0 214 IS . 0 0.0 0.0
ICU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
32
A
61
B
38
INTERSECfION CAPACITY UTILlZA TION
DATE: Sep-91
PROJECT: Temecula General Plan Circulalion Elemenl
LOCATION: Mumeta Hol Springs Rd. & 1-215 NO Ramps
Scenario:
Exisling Conditions
10:
2117
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type of Area: NON-COD
lAne Heavy ConmCling
Capacity Volume V/C Capacity Volume V/C Width Veh. Grade Parking Ous Pedcstrians
Movements lAne (vphg) (vphg) (ft) (%HV) (%) (Nm) (Nb)
NOR11-I0OUND
Thru 1 1287 0 6.. 1287 0 29 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 62 o . 0 360 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 12 1 0 8 1 0 0.0 0.0
SOUTIlOOUND
Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 o . 0 0 o ' 0 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUNU
Thru 1 1478 188 15 1480 638 51 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Righi Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ' 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 36 2 . 0 116 8 0 0.0 0.0
WESlllOUND
Thru 1 1683 498 30' 1683 492 29 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RighI Turn 1 1388 114 o · 1388 254 0 11 2.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 o . 0 0.0 0.0
lCU (%)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
38
A
80
C
NOles:
1. . Indicatcs crilicallane vIe
2. Turning volumes are added 10 lhru volume where Ihere is
no oeparale luming lane
3. Nm - Number oC Maneuvers pcr Hour
4. Nb - Number of bulCS per Hour
5. Three percent minimum green to cycle ralio assumed Cor crilicallcflolum movement
WILllUR SMI11\ ASSOCIA 1ES
39
INTERSECTION CAP ACITI UTILIZATION
DAre Sep.91
PROJECT: Telnccvla General Plan Cirnalation Element
LOCA nON: Mumeta Hot Springs Rd. Ie Jackson Ave.
Scenario:
Existinc Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Type of Area: NON.CBD
Lane He.a~ Conmetin,
Capacity Volume V/C Capacity Volume V/C Width V.h. Grade Parkinc Bus Pedestrians
Movements Lane (vph&) (vphC) (rt) (~HV) (~) (Nm) (Nb)
NORnJBOUND
Thna 1 1287 0 1 1287 0 0 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 11 1 . 0 . o · 0 0.0 0.0
SOUTIiBOUND
Thna 1 1287 0 2 . 1287 0 11 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
RiCht Turn 0 0 23 o . 0 126 o . 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 . 0 0 16 1 0 0.0 0.0
EASTBOUND
Thna 1 1.79 307 25 . H76 790 64 . 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 6 o . 0 10 o · 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 51 3 0 150 10 0 0.0 0.0
WESTBOUND
Thna 2 3350 578 18 3334 S66 18 12 2.0 0.0 0 0
Right Turn 0 0 13 0 0 32 0 0 0.0 0.0 0
Left Turn 0 0 6 o . 0 6 o . 0 0.0 0.0
ID'
2118
ICU (~)-
LEVEL OF SERVICE -
28
A
75
C
Notes:
1. . Indicales critical lane vie
2. Turnin: volumes are added to thna volume ..ilCf'C there is
no separale turninc Jane
3. Nm - Number of Maneuvers pcr Hour
.. Nb . Number of buses per Hour
5. Three pcrcent minimuln ,reen to cycle r:atio assumed for aiticalleCt.turn movement
WILBUR SMITIi ASSOCIA lES
HeM Unsignalized Intersections Analysis Worksheets
6
{oOeOd
l'I^US'JOo1311l1 aNY UI'YcIY'
z.aSed
SI01'Yl lNllllS0rOl
.ae.d
SIIOI1nSU1N
03lIlYIl!IISNIl '10M ~Iel
,
U"Y"",
3IIU531
(Ifd>d)
11 "Yd~
OnYMS
II
(Ifd>d) ,
111 'YdY'
lN3II3^0N
lYOny
d
(Ifd>d) , (1fd>d)A
U "Yd~ 31'11
1'111 -/lOH
-Nll04
SNlm lM"1 101
lNYl IIOI1YU13"Y
IIIIllJ IM"I 101
II 101011 11ft)
n,1lY
III111J 1M' II
lOl"
JNl,.ld
1I011Y11101"
'Nil
'""Ol
SOl
A
J" 3ll3IIOlI
OZ
06
00'0
OIV1OIUlfl
OIlIlDIUYJ
O{
JUIIS
IOrYII
'aUdl '"IN"OI 3!lYl3IIY
III
MI
OZ
06
00'0
IOl]YI
100II 1IY3d
'I y. LZ6
. 60S
S92
966
IZ(
69Z
966
12{
69Z
966
Z~S
162
69
ZI
[
lUlU
JM'II
M!JfOIM 1
J111
IONIII
III
II
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
00'0
OIIOOIIIJ_
OIlOOINJnos
01
OOOO~I
Ylll1011l~ OM'"V1
lUlU
'110 11 YlIldOd
U]rI/UYJ ilMJ 10
VilIY
Mil
Il9
6Sl
.
.
110 111 SOcIIIIn
ill"M311
'I y. S06
I . {5{
, nz
ZI6
l~[
l~Z
216
l~S
lSZ
216
16{
GO[
.
,
21
133WJS
III" I
1I!JfOIMl
1Iill
_III
IS
531'''101011 X
Sil1'IM311
110 11 VII Ill<<" X
S.^I OIlY
U:lI1I1 lIS X
10 XlYd SS3111SOI
'd'Y
661-01.60
lUllS Unos/Ml_ 3IIJ
(AAIFPIW)
$IUWIlY 3111
lU WilY 3IIJ 10 Mil
10 J1 YO
10
JIIYM
lS
us
o
o
o
_lSViI
1l1OIl1lYild
IIY
'OilU1YIlY an'3d
JIII1
'I
'I
III
2S9
["
{S,
06
S~9
S"
(S,
~21
I
133WJS
un
1In
IOrYll
..
iii
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0II0011Slfl
1110 111 CIIIOO
'"IUIX)
'1IOI1WIlUIII
13Ml0
o
o
CIIlnOIIl JIlOS
_U_
1OI1~ OIlY Ull
IIOllnSlllll1
,n.,
3dU
1I01l]3Slll"1
110 11 YII1lO1 II I
lIIOIlIOllO' '"I1IIX3 . 110 IlYllIOJ" I Ulll0
IllOM XVild IIY : 661-01-60 'IIUWIIY ilMl 1031111 OIlY IlYO
'10 XlYd IUIIISIlI JUIJS Unos/Mllll11 IMl 10 Mil
YIIIIIlJIl~ 0Il'1lYI lUlU U]rI/JSYiI lMl 10 MM
'01
OMlll
lMIOI
m
1'1"11"
lYMU
JN3IIUOrOl
JSIO JlmlS
3I11Y^
OUlnrOl
2-01
13I11Y^
.,qej)
IYlIlIY J
1m mill"
UMOII
101I'11
JS]rI/ UViI
Il!III dOU
Il!IIS dOJS
'1I01l'iIIlG JUIIS
'_Mlnos ldU
'_MlIOM IdU
Ill/'Yll
101111CD
101111CD
O~.~
O~.~
00'0
00'0
O~'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
IS
III
51111
Ill/'W
13III1lll^
" UVll
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
11\
Il
II
1M
IMDflIllHl
101I111
IS
\I
I"
[
..
"
iii
IIl1
OS"
o~.,
00'0
00'0
OS"
os.,
os.,
o~.,
01
\I
22{
IIIHJ
lun
11IM III
S9
01
l
1 lID II
oo'l
oo'l
00'0
00'0
OO'l
OO'l
OO'l
OO-l
IS
1M
;r.IYIO illIYl
OIlY
53NYl JO Utllflll
IIOI1WllllMI '"IUI1""OI
'01
Il10Il
11101110110' 'NI 1$ IX)
XYJd IIY : 661'01-60 IISllYIlY
. 10 JlYd 111M I 101
YI"IIlHl~ O",MVI
Ull11 MUlOI/MlIO" 3MJ JO
JUIU Ulfl/UYJ 3MJ 10
. 110 I1WlIll" I UMJO
lMJ 10 31111 OIlY IlYO
JIIYM
MM
IS
2
I"
2
11\
S
iii
2
UIlY1
6
[.'.'d
3)IA13S.JO'13A31 aNY
111)'1cI'IJ
Z..S.d
SI01)'1J lN3IIlsoroy
..8ed
SNOI
)35U1N
OJU1'1N'151l1l
'IOH
SV61
HS
, .
111)'1d'l)
3/l13S3I
HS
1'1'1><1) ,
11 1)'1.rn
03....115
1'1'1><1)
111)'101'1)
lH3IIJAOII
1,,"1)'1
''1 1
.NUDd
d
('1'1><1) ,
11 1)'101'1)
('I'I><1)A
Jl'11
.IlOH
SHlIll lH"1 IOJ
3NYl 11011'11313))'1
SNlIll IN'' I IOJ
1" SOl OYI IIf1J
31'N'I
NlIll 1M"I
JOY.,
1"3)13d
1I011.....IOIN
,HIUIlHJOI
SOl
A
JN3II3AllII
OZ
06
00'0
_Nl_
CIIlIlOI1SJII
CIIIf1OI1SYJ
O[
lUllS
lOr.....
'OUdS 'NIHNIlI 3'YlJA'I
II
OZ
06
00"0
'101''11
IIlOII JYJd
'I 'Ie
) e
)
~V~
[el
elZ
016
'6Z
"Z
016
,el
vn
016
OS[
lel
61
JUIlS
IN''1
N!lflOlHl
HJl
ION III
IN
N
N
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
IIOI1ISOdNO:l 31)IH3/I
00'0 ~lI101
'01
OOOOSI
Y1NIOJI1YJ ON'"YI
IIOUY'lIldDoI
lUllS lSJIII15YJ
3111
JO
'illY
_N
6'~
[IV
[ZI
, 'Ie
) e
o
[66
vez
VII
966
Z6Z
6V1
966
Zel
6V1
966
1'It
~'Z
[
,
Z~
lUllS
JM,,,
N!lflOllll
HJl
ION III
"
U1,AJI0101l X
U"IN3A
IIOI1'NlllIO) X
SI^I 0ffY
S):JI11l OS
X
10 )....d lSiNll1lI
d"Y
661'01-60
n3llS NlllOS/NllON 3111
(AA/PPIW)
lU1YNY
IIU'IYllY
3Ml
Jlllm
10
m_
31'10
_N
6"
o
o
o
CIIIf1OI1SYJ
IIlOII
)YJd Md
'OJU1"" CIOlnd
Nil
13JIlS
101'.....
o
o
o
QIlIlOIUJII
1IIOIlIClllOJ
'NIUIU
.1I01l.....IOJNI
IJlll0
,
,
,~S
'SI
,U
[91
tu
[9t
,U
[91
191
6
U31
HJl
11\
13
o
o
o
QIlIlOtIIl_
1011110)
ClllYU11
IIOU'JIIJlHl
o
o
o
_Nlnos
,n.,
'Jd11
1I011'31131NI
IIlOII
110 U.....IOJN 1
SIIOUlllNO) 'HUSln 'IIOU~JN
)YJd lid : 661.01-60 '5ISn'N' 3111 m 3IIU aNY
'10 )I'd SSiNISIII lUlU Nlnos/Hl1ON 3Ml Ie
'01 Y1NIOJI1YJ OM)NYI n3lJS JSJIIIlSYJ 3MJ
,"IUUN30t
UHIO
31'0
I_N
JO _N
d'f!l
''1'1111)
"NI
lNllIlSnroy
lUO IN'''
311"^
ousnroy
Z.OI
13I11'^
.lqell
IY 1111'1 1
Id" lYJllIlJ
$1N"1
ION III
lSil/JSYJ '11011'1110 lUllS
"'15
"'15
0<<111
0<<I1S
'-..lnos Id11
'CIIIf1OIIlllON Jd11
10/'.....
'1011110)
1011/1lT.1
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00"0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
II
IN
sun
10/'.....
IM110A
JlHYll
OS"S
OS.S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS"S
OS'S
OS.
11\
n
IS
IN
SH~l _Ill
"
S9
IN
~I
1/1
9"
IJ
V
un
OS"
OS"'
00'0
00.0
OS'9
OS.,
OS'9
os.,
60Z
VU
I1INl
lun
ION III
[
ZI
VI
'Z
IN'..
OO'l
OO'~
00'0
00'0
oo'~
OO'~
OO'~
oo'l
"
IN
J!lYSIl
INYl
CIIIY
UNY1 JO
13l1l1'Ul
IIlOII
)'Id lid : 661 '1" ""
. 10 )I'd IUN I Sill
'01 Y1NIOII1YJ ON)NYI
110 11 VIIIOI H I
110) 'NIUIU 110 U.....llOJN 1 UH10
'SISnYN' 3Hl 10 11111 ON' UYO
1331lS NU'IO$/NlION INl JO _N
lUllS 1531\/15YJ INl 10 _N
'NIUI1N301
II
IN
11\
[
IJ
UNYl
L~
{ . aBed
3JIAIJS-10-HA31
ONY U I JYdYJ
Z-OSOd
SIOIJY J
1N3MIsnraY
..".... ..." .......... ... ... ..... .. ...."" ......
l-oSOd SIIOIIJ35IJINI OJZllYN9ISNn '10M 5V61
. . .
AlIJYdYJ
JAUSJI
("":>ell
UIJYdYJ
OnYMS
("":>ell
UJJYdYJ
IN3M3A01l
lynl JY
d
(",,:>eI) .
U IJYdYJ
lYlI
-N31ed
("">d)A
JlYI
./lOlJ
SNI01 11l"1 101
3"Yl 1I01IYUlJJJY
SNWlI 11l'11 101
UII SOIaYl IllIlJ
Jl'NY
Olll'll Ill' II
JaY.,
INnUd
IIOIIYNIOIOI
'"IUIINJOI
501
A
IN3MJAOII
Ol
06
00.0
_ISY3
0{
UUlS
IOrYN
'OUdS 'NIN,,"I r.lYllJAY
MS
9U
"I
Zll
Zit
IlS
Il
ZlIl
Zi
Zll
Sill
"
6Z
lUllS
1M' II
llil 13
_Ill
Ol
Ol
06
06
ONllOII S ~
1I01I/S0dIl00 I1JIIlJA
00'0 _"lnos
00'0 _Ml_
'01
OOOOSl
_113110
UJllS
'IOIJYJ
lS Jf\/ ISYJ
'lIOlIYlIlollld
3M1
IIllH lIYJ4
10
YJIY
JIIYIl
nnlS
IOrYll
JAY
NOSlunr
'd'Y
lUllS
Mlnos/llUON
151 lY1lY 3Ml 10 JllYo
Illl JO
JIIYIl
sn
{'S
OS
OS
liS
IIJl IN
U1JAJIOI011 X
U1JIUA
110 llYN III<<lJ X
S.AIOIIY
UJf111 ns X
661-01.60
(AA/JIP/lIIIII
SJUlYllY JIll
10 I1YO
o
o
o
_ISYJ
lIRlM
~Yld
NY
'03UlYllY OOIUd
JIII1
IIOI1Yl11OJol
SIIOI1I011OJ '"I1SIXI .. ullOl1Yl11OIOI IIIlI0
NY : 661-01-60 .. u 'USAlYllY JNl JO JIII1 ONY UYO
'JAy IlOSUHJr lUllS olllOS/ol_ 3Ml 10 _
'01 OIlYllJ11O lUllS 1SJf\/ISYJ 3M1 10 Mo
'oIUl1oJOI
o
o
o
o
o
o
011I10115 .,
OIlnOIIIlnos
_Ml_
SlIOllI 0Il0J
,0I1SIXI
1011110J OIlY
. 110 I1Y1l1OIN I IJIlIO
IdU
IIOIIJISUUI
W10tI lIVJd
IIOI1J35UINI'1
IdU
IIOIIJ35UUI
Sd" 'lYJ11I1J
N1nos/Ml_ llIOl1JlllO
lUllS
IOI'Yll
lYJlIlIJ
lYNU
10illl5/W'aY
IUO U'IS
JIllYA
OJlsnraY
(ZoOI
SJIllYA
'ICIOU
IYlfl1n
"'IS
dOlS
_lSYI JdU
10111UJ
dY,
00'0
OS.S
SIN' II
lOll III
SJIfllOo\
JI unl
OS.S
OS'S
II
SUll
IOrYll
"
IN
III
n
05'5
00'0
05'5
OS
IN
o
{S
9Z
1111
OO.l
00'0
OO'l
OO'l
n
SlIll
ION III
U5
Z6{
065
1II1l1
110 11 YlIIOI"
SIIOI1I011OJ 'oI1SIXI ollOl1Yl1lOlNJ
NY : 661001060 "SISA lYIlY JN1 10 i1111 OIlY
'JAY IlOSUllJr 'IUIIS Nlnos/NlION JNI JO
'01 CIIIY11J11O lUllS 1SJf\/ISYJ INI 10
'oIUlINIOI
MN
-
{II
in
Z'
1"'11
IIlDH
JYJd
UNIO
JlYO
UllYl JO UIIIYl
IS
Z
IN
III
n
l
UllYl
[ .aeed
3J IAIlS, 40. 13Ml
ONY Ai I JyclYJ
z-ae'd
SlOlJYl
N3WlSnfGY
.aeed
so,
A
~ .
1 II JYdYJ
3I\IlS 31
MS
Cqd:xl) ~
AiIJYdYJ
a3.YNS
II
cqd:xl) ~
Ai I JYdY'
1 N 3ll3A011
lml'Y
d
Cqd:xl) ~ Cqd:xl)A
UIJY4YJ un
'YII '11014
.010.1
lN3II3AOII
SNIl'II 1M'" 104
3NY' NOIIYIl13JJY
SNll'Il 1M'" 104
II) SOl GY' IIl'IJ
oz
MS
L99
LZ'
U3IlS
IOfYII
NO 111 SOdIlOJ
I1J I M3I\
Y
6Z'
III'IlIl
16'
'Ud
d'r.J
lYJ III1J
lYNU
OS'S
OS'
OO'L
00'0
oo'L
OO'L
n
unl
ION III
III'IlIl
,.3d
NOIIYllI04N
SNOIIIOIIOJ 'NIISIX3 NO 1IY11IOIN , IlMI0
11<I ~ 661.01'60 .....SlSA1YNY 3Ml 40 31111 ONY uYO
'3I\Y NOS13H3f .. "lUllS MlnoS/MIIOM 3Ml 40 3IIY'N
'01 OIlYl.W ......lU.lS 1S3II/JSY3 3Ml 40 311YN
3"1lV
Nllll IM'I.
06
.
nL
'L
9'L
'L
9'L
,
61.
101
U3IlS
IM'II
1111 n
16'
SNOllIOIlOJ 'NI15IX3 'NOIIYllI04NI 13MI0
lid ~ 661'01.60' 'SIU1YNY 3Ml JO 31111 ONY liYO
'3I\Y IlOSIlHlf' lUllS Mlnos/MiION IMl 40 IIIYN
'01 CIIIY1.W "lUllS 15311/JSYI JIll 40 _
lN3IIlSfYGY
ISla llr.1lS
00'0
00'0
'N1A1I1N301
z Z UllVl
.
IS IN III 13
.. .. .. .. ....---
IJIlY1 10 n..-
LS HI U 1M'"
I~ 9U 06S n'MI
0 LS Z6 1111
... ---. ......
IS IN M n
... .-.-.. .... .......................
S...,1Oo\ 3U""l
II!lIS dOJS 'OII/'IOIlS'l 1411 1O.iNOJ
Mlnos/lilOll 'NOII'IIIO lU.IS 1OI'Y11
NOII'JS13INI.i lUll NOlI'JSUlIl
,.. .......--.--.............--................
1GIlNOJ OIlY 1411 NOII'JS131N'
SNOlIllIIlOJ 'NllSIXI ....lIOIIYllIOIM' 13ua
II1IM JY3d 11<I ................ 'aU11YllY CIlIIU JllII
661'01'60 ......CAAtpp,..) SIU1YIIY JIll 10 U'O
'd" ..................lUlYllV JIll JO _
3I\Y IlOSnHJf ..... "lU.IS Nlnos/HIIOII JIll 10 _
'0' CIIIY1IW ....... "lUllS lSWlSYJ JIll j() JllYN
OOOOSl .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. NOli Y'1/WloI Y31Y
I .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. "101)" IJ1lIl "Jd
O[ . 'IUIlS 1OI'Y11 'ou'" 'NINIlII. J!ln3l\Y
........................--......-....-.............
NOIIYWIOI"' 'N'UIINlOI
'....... .......... ............ ........
SllOlIJJSnlNl 03111YJr.l1S1lIl '10M SS61
L~
JOY.,
1"J'134
00'0
CIIIIlOIlSY3
IONIII
OZ
oz
06
06
00'0
00'0
QIl/'IOllnll
OII/'IOIMII011
CIIII1lIMlnos
6'
[9
NOIIYIIlIOINI 'NIHIINJOI
IHl IN
nlJ1'IOIOII x
o
o
o
SI1JIM3I\
NOIIYNIIIIO)
o
o
o
x
S .A' CINY
UJIlIl lIS
o
o
o
x
CIIII1l115'J
_Minos
_MlIOII
_lS JII
Sd'r.J
lYJ I 111)
Jnl'A
ausnroy
OS'S
OS'S
CZ'OI
SJnl'A
OS'
OS'S
e,...u
1Y1I1I'1
SIN'II
n
IN
sun
IOIlII1
IOfYII
21
Pege.3
SERVICE
CAPACI TY AND LEVEL -Of
page.2
fACTORS
ADJUSTMEN
'Igc.
NTERSECT lOllS
ZED
UNSIGNAL
MeM
1985
RE SERVE
CAPACITY
c
SMARED
CAPACI
AC TUAl
MOVEMENY
POTEN-
TIAL
CAPAC I TY
Cpcp/l)
P
fL 0lI-
RATE
vCpcp/l
ACCELERATlOII LANE
fOR R (GNT TURNS
CURl RAD IUS C It
fOR R I GNT TUINS
II GMT TUlN
ANGLE
PERCENT
GRADE
NfORMATlOII
IDENTIfYING
LOS
v
TY
Cpcp/l)
c
CAPACI TY
c Cpcp/l)
N
MOVEMEN T
20
90
O.DO
EASTlOUIID
3D
STREET
MAJOR
AVERAGE RUllNING SPUD.
$M
SN
2D
90
D.DO
IlESTlOUIID
fACTOR
IKlUlt
PEAr
.
.10 I
. A
222
308
931
222
308
932
.
.
.
222
301
932
308
405
932
o
o
1
STlEET
NI LEfT
TNlOUGN
IIGMT
HI NOR
2D
20
9D
90
D.DO
SOUT NIDUND 0.00
VENICLE ClJU'DSITIOII
NOR T NIDUND
15DOOO
79
$1
STREET
POl'ULA TI 011.
ME EAn II.n Y
Df
AREA
--
931
932
n IEET
HINOR
5 SI IANI'S
A.P.
_TN/SOUTN ST REET
TME ANALYST
Of TNE
Of
--
NAIl(
-2
253
B64
217
253
946
217
253
946
285
333
946
219
o
83
LEfT
T NROUGN
IIGMT
sa
X IIOTCIlCYClES
COlli HI. TI 011
VEHICLES
x
x SII llUCKS
AND IV'S
C
A
o
o
o
STREET
""JCIl
o
o
o
EASTIDUND
lIE ST IDUND
_THIDUND
SOUTHIDUND
09-10-199
C...,ddlyy )
ANALYSIS
DllME
DATE
IlllI.Il
PEAr
All
ANAL UED.
PERIOD
TillE
CONDIT lOllS
EXISTING
INfORMATlOII
OlMEI
A
A
897
6111
897
987
897
987
897
987
o
306
lEfT
LEfT
EI
WI
o
o
D
"PE 10110 COIITROl.
INTERSECIIOII
o
o
o
4'LEG
"PE:
1011
I HlER SEC
CRITICAL GAPS
EAn IllEST
STRUT DIRECTlOII:
1IA.IOlI
IlllI.Il
PEAr
I N fDRllA TI 011
'ME E"STIllEST STREET 79
'ME HORTH/SOUIH STREET 15 SI lAMPS
TIME Of 'ME ANALYSIS. 09-10-199 : AM
HfORIlATlOII EXISTING CDllDITIOIIS
SI
IDEHII"ING
HAIlE Of
NAIlE Of
DATE AND
OTMER
GAP
INAl
CIITICAL
SIG"T Din
ADJUS!IIEHI
ADJUSTED
VALUE
VALUES
10-2
TAMAI
(hbl.
IIGMIS
HINCIl
SIGN
SIGN
SlOP
STOP
NOR' IlIOUIID :
SOUTMIOUIIO :
TYPE
"PE
CDIIIIOl.
CDIITROl.
5.50
5.50
O.DO
O.DO
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
NI
SI
\IDl.l.uiS
TRAffIC
5.DO
S.DO
O.DO
0.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
lUIS
IIAJCIl
EI
...
SI
NI
...
EI
199
o
278
o
LEfT
6.00
6.50
0.00
0.00
6.DO
6.50
6.00
6.50
TMlOUGHS
NI
SI
HI_
o
o
293
131
lMRU
lEfTS
HI_
75
o
58
IIGMT
6.50
7.00
0.00
0.00
6.50
7.00
6.50
7.00
NI
SI
lANES AIID lAIIE USAGE
Of
IIUNIER
IIDUll
PEAK
IDENllfTlNG INfDRllAIIOII
sa 79
1- IS SI IANI'S
AHAlYSIS 09-10'199 : All
EXISIING COlIDITIOIIS
UST IllES! nlEET
_IM/SOUIH STREET
DA TE 10110 IIHE Of TME
OTMER INfORllAtlOII
IHE
IHE
Of
Of
NAIlE
NAIIE
sa
2
NI
WI
2
EI
lAIIE S
21
19115 NCH:
"8e-)
CAPACITY AND LEVEl-Of-SERVICE
'.ge~2
fACTOIlS
ADJUSY"ENT
Plgl
NTERSECTlOIIS
ZED
UIIS1 GMAL
LOS
RESERVE
CAPACI TY
. c
TY
(pcph
SNARED
CAPAC
ACTUAL
HOVE"ENT
CAPAC TY
c (pcph)
"
POTEN-
fLOlI- TlAL
RATE CAPACITY
y(pcph) c (pcph)
p
HOVE"ENT
ACCElERATlOII LANE
fOIl RIGNI TURNS
CUlI1 RADIUS (f
fOIl R IGMT TlItNS
20
UGHT TURH
AHGLE
90
PERCENT
GRADE
D.DO
EAST_
)0
STlEET
NfORIlATlOII
1lA.IOll
IDENTIfYING
AVEUGE RUNNING SPEED.
y
SN
SH
20
90
O.DO
IIESTIalHD
fACIOR
PEAI:~
.
.A C
. A
220
287
664
220
217
665
220
2&7
665
295
371
665
o
o
1
STlEET
NI LEfT
THROUGH
RIGHT
"INOR
N
20
20
80
80
0.00
SllJTHIlUID 0,00
VIH I CLE COlPOS IT 1011
IIOlIYHIlUID
l5DOOO
79
u
SIREET
POPUlA TlOII,
HAM Of TIlE EASTI\IEST
AREA
664
665
R_S
5 SI
NAME Of TIlE NORTH/SllJTN STlEET
SlREET
"I NOR
A.P.
NAME Of TIlE AIlAl YST
14
222
942
1M
222
996
lea
222
996
244
2ea
996
303
o
54
LEfT
THROJGH
liGHT
SI
X IIOTORCYCLES
COIIlII NA TI 011
VIHICLES
x
x SU TllICrs
AIID IV'S
09-10-199
(...,ddlyy)
Of llIE AlIALnlS
DATE
C
A
o
o
o
EASTIlUID
PEAl: HOJR
PH
TIllE PUllI) AIlAlnED
STREET
IlAJOR
o
o
o
IlESTlOUIID
COHO IT lOllS
EXISTING
I NfOllIlATlOH.
OTIlER
TYH AND COIITROL
INTERSECTlOII
A
A
992
492
992
700
992
700
992
700
o
201
LEfT
LEfT
EI
WI
o
o
o
NOIlTll.OUIID
o
o
o
SllJTHIlUID
4-LEG
TYPE'
INTElSECT 1011
PEAr HaM
IDENTlnlNG INfORIlATlOII
NAIlE Of THE EAST/llEST STRUT 51 79
NAIIE Of THE _TH/SllJIN STREET 1-15 SI R_S
DATE AND TIllE Of THE ANALYSIS. 09.10.199 : PH
OlHER INfORIlATlOII EXISTING COIIOITIOIIS
GAP
NAL
CIITlCAL
SIGHT DIST
ADJUSTIlENT
ADMTED
VALUE
TAIULAI VALUES
(Telll. 10,2)
CIITICAL GAPS
lIGHTS
IlINOR
EAST l.oUT
SI'"
SI'"
STOP
STOP
DIRECTlOII:
_THIOJHO:
SllJTNIlUID.
STlEU
TYPE
TYPE
COIITROL
COIIIIOL
MA.IOll
5.50
5.50
0.00
0.00
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
NI
SI
VOlUIIES
TRAff I C
LEfTS
1lA_
5.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
EI
WI
SI
NI
WI
EI
275
o
119
o
LEFT
0.00
0.00
6.00
6.50
6.00
6.50
THlOUGHS
NI
SI
III NOR
o
o
152
lal
THIU
6.00
6.50
LEfTS
III NOR
49
o
134
IIGNT
6.50
7.00
0.00
0.00
6.50
7.00
6.50
7.00
NI
SI
USAGE
LANE
AIIO
Of LANES
IAJlIlER
IlllIll
PEAr
5179
15 SI I_S
PH
)
NfORllATlOII
II'"
EXISTING COHIll
TIlE EASTlIlEST STREET
THE IIORTH/SllJTIl STREU
DATE AND TlHE Of THE ANALYSIS.
OTHER I N fORIlATI 011.
nlNG
NAIlE Of
NAIIE Of
IDENT
SI
NI
WI
EI
LUES
~~
t ..e'd
iJIAUS-lO-1]An
OIlY UIJYdYJ
l-.e'd
SlOlJYl
l"iMlSnrov
.a'd
SIlO I
JnUl"
an
lY",ISNn
'IOH S861
, .
111 JYdYJ
""usn
(lfdod I
Il1JYdYJ
OiIYHS
lUMiMlM
lWlIJY
d
lfdodl
U IJYd'tJ
lYI1
"UDd
(lfdodlA
UYI
-/lOll
s""m IH~ II IOl
iNYl IIOl1ynnJJY
5"1111 IH~II 101
(UI SnlOVI 111ft)
il~1IY
"1111 IH" I
iOVI'
lUJnd
IIOI1YN1OlNI
~"IA
lUOI
SOl
A
,
M
(lfdodl ,
111 JYdYJ
l"iMiMlM
Ol
06
00'0
GNIlOIISYJ
Ot
lUllS
IOrVII
'OiidS ~"I"""" "YI""Y
"5
"S
Ol
06
00'0
lIIII'OllS~
101]Yl
Ilt'OlI
Jnd
IS8
661
l6
8[6
661
~I
1{6
661
~I
1{6
SOl
691
l8
o
19
nnu
1"" I
"""""1
un I"
IO"IM
"
"
Ol
Ol
06
06
00'0
00'0
OIll'lOeMl_
_"lnos
ooaos I
6L
IS
lUllS
-110 11 YlfldOd
sill/UYJ i"1
YJ"
10 illY"
Y y.
o .
110 111 SOdWO) ill) I"""
Y
)
o
.
y.
.
7fS
eLl
661
58
StS
6Ll
661
et6
Sts
6Ll
661
SSS
68l
III
I
o
o
IHUS
IH"I
H",,"" 1
Ui' IS
IO"IN
nl)1)101D1l x
U')IN""
IIOI1Y"IIMO) X
S.AI OIly
SJ:JI1I1 ns x
SdlIYI I" SI
'd'Y
661-01-60
nnu HUIlS/MlIO" i111
(AA/PPIWI
S1511'f1lY
51 W"Y i"1 10
iHl 10 UYO
10
illY"
illY"
7fS
Sts
o
o
o
OIlI1lI1SYi
IIf10lI
JYJd
MY
'ouny"y CIIlnd
JIII1
IHIIS
IOr'fll
o
o
o
a
o
o
o
o
o
0IlI1l11S~
_"lnos
_"1101I
SIlO 111 0Il0J
~"IISIXJ
'1I011V11IOINI
n"10
Y
Y
till
In
till
9S'
till
9S'
till
95'
o
'l
In,
Uil
1/1
Ii
1011110) OIlY IdU
IIOI1];,snl"1
Sd'f!J mil
II)
~n-'
idll
1I011];,snlNI
1Sill/ISYi
:1I011)nIO lUllS
IOrVII
110 11 'fll101" ,
~"UIIUIOI
'Y)'
W"U
l"iIIIIWOV
ISla 1""5
JIl'YA
.onsnrov
l-Ol
SJO'YA
""'11
IY1I1IYl
Il1ltI
J'fJd
MY
SdlIYI IN 5 I
6L
IS
SIlO'
661-01-60
~"IISINJ
'slsnylIY ""1
lUllS MlnoS/"IIO"
lUllS UJll/1S'fJ
""1
""1
1I011V11101"' n"IO
10 JMI1 OIly UYO
10 illY"
10 illY"
dY~
IIJ
S1"~1I
_IN
"'IS dOlS
"'IS dOU
CIIlI1OIHIIO" idll
OIlI1OIH lnos
Idll
1011110:)
1011110:)
0110)
OS'S
05'5
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'
05'5
IS
I"
sun
_VII
5 _lOA
J I UYI1
OS'S
05'5
00'0
00'0
05'5
OS'S
OS'S
05'5
1/1
Ii
IS
I"
1/1
Ii
IS
I"
SH,""IHl
IO"IN
o
19
o
II
un
00'9
05'9
00'0
00'0
00'9
05'9
00'9
05'9
o
01S
o
VOt
nllll!
SUI'
_IN
6L
l'l
o
1N~1I
OS.,
OO'l
00'0
00'0
OS"
OO'l
OS.,
OO'l
IS
I"
",nn ""Y'
OIlY
U"Y'
10 nllrlll
IIf10lI
JYld
SIlO I
NY : 661-01-60
SdlIYI I" 51
6L
IS
110 11 VllIO '" I
0110) ~"I1SINJ . 1I011'f11101" , li"10
"snny"y iHl 10 iMI1 OIly UYO
'IUIIS _lnos/HIIO" iHl
lUllS UiII/IS'fJ i111
~"IUI1"iOl
10
10
)NYN
MIl
IS
IN
1/1
II
z
UNY'
~~
[ ..eed
iJIAliS'IO-HAil
aNY A! I JYclYJ
z-.eOd
IlOlJYl
iNilUlnroy
. as...
1110
JUUiNl
aUIl'M'IS,," 'ION
SV61
NS
. . .
11IJYclYJ
MUUI
.
I JVdYJ
ailYNS
II
(qdod)
UIJVdYJ
IM3IIiMlN
lmlJY
lYI1
-MUOd
(qdod)A
ilYl
./lOll
SMIII11 IN"I 101
iNVl IIOI1YUHJJV
IMII'II 1M'" IlU
III InlOYI 11II1J
il'MY
Mllfll 1M'"
iOYII'.l
lNiJUd
110 I1YlllOlM I
'Mluuoal
SOl
A
(lfllod)
11
d
(lfllod) .
A!IJYdVJ
iN3IIi_
oz
06
00.0
CINf1OI1 SY!
o{
unls
IOrYll
'andl 'MIM,,"I "'VIM'
MI
M
oz
06
00.0
aNnOIU~
OIOIJYI
II'IIllI
JYJd
Y y. [[9
o . 55
IL
56L 56L
551
LlI
S6L
551
LZI
56L
891
V{I
291
o
95
lUlU
IN'"
N!I/lOINI
Uil 1M
101I111
M
oz
oz
06
06
00.0
IIOI1ISOdNOJ nJINM
'0 ClIIIlOINlnos
00
CINIlllINIIOM
??oo51
6L
II
unu
. 110 IIYlIWOd
uWUYi iM! 10
YJIY
MIl
({9
v . m
J V' SZZ m
a .on
'"
SZZ
on
.
.
.
'"
szz
on
'"
nz
"I
I
o
o
lUlU
lM"1
M!lflOlIllI
lnl
101I111
IS
U1J1JIOIOlI X
U1JINM
IIOI1YNIIIlllJ X
S.AI CIIlY
SJJnII ns
x
IdllYl 1M 51
Od'Y
661-01-60
InlU Nlnos/U_ iIIl 10 _
(1J./P9/W1
IllllY1lY
III lY1lY iIIl 10 illYJl
iNI 10 UYO
'"
o
o
o
a'rotUIYJ
IIlOIl
JYJd lid
'aUA1YllY CIOIUd .11
Uilll
IOrYN
o
o
o
CIIItlOtUI~
1110 111 ClIIOJ
'NIUln
'1011 WllllM 1
liIIlO
Y
Y
Z95
915
295
8VS
Z9'>
8VS
Z9S
8VS
o
U.
un
un
WI
Ii
o
o
o
o
o
o
ClIIIlOIunos
_NllOII
101l1lOJ CIIIY UA!
IOI1:1nUUI
'il-'
idA!
IOI1JnUINI
Il1lII
JYid
lOll YlllllUNI
SIOI1I011O:1 'NI1SIXi '1OI1YNlOlMI UNIO
114 : 661-01-60 'S11l1YNY illl 10 31111 ONY ilYO
loIIIYlI 1M 51-I nnu unos/UIOII ilIl 10 MN
6L IS nnu IIWISYJ JIll 10 MM
'MIUUNIOI
c1Y,
lYJI1I.,
lYNU
1NIIUsnroy
1110 IN'''
il'I1Y^
ousnroy
Z-Ol elqell
lil'I1YA IY1I1tIYI
leMI
11M'"
lYJ1111J
ION III
IS~/IIYJ
"'II
"'II
oII111
dOli
'IIOIIJIIIO lU11I
, OJnlINUlOS
'_.1101I UAI
IdA!
IOI'YN
lOllllOJ
lOl1l1OJ
05'5
05.5
00-0
00'0
05'5
05.5
05'5
05'5
II
IN
)J UYI1
lun
IOrYN
liIIIllOA
05'5
05'5
00'0
00'0
05'5
05.5
05'5
05.5
III
Ii
"
1M
WI
n
o
15
o
99
UIl
00.'
Os.,
00.0
00.0
00"
05'9
00.9
os.,
II
1M
IN!II1llINI
101I111
o
o
06Z
065
1\1II1
lUll
10M I.
L'I
"z
o
IM"I
os.,
OO.L
00'0
00'0
OS"
OO'L
05'9
OO'L
II
IN
J!lnn INYl
CIIlY
UNYl 10 U......
II'IIllI
JYld
IlOI1WlOlNI
1110111011O:1 ,MIUIU . 110 I1YNlOlN I UNIO
114 : 661-01-60 'SllllYNY INI 10 11111 aNY UYO
IdllYl 1M 51 lUlU .lnos/UION 1.1 10 illlYM
6L lUlU UWIIYJ IU 10 _
II
'.UH INIOI
II
1M
z
WI
II
z
UllYl
t7~
[.alS.d
IJIAUS'JO.UAn ONY UIJYdYJ
z-aS_d
SllOlJYl 1OJlllSnrOV
-,SOd
SIlO I
JnlUN
on
lYN91 SNn
:NJ" Se61
MS
, .
U IJYdYJ
IAIJSJI
MS
(Ijd:>d)
U IJYdYJ
ony"s
N
(Ijd:>d)
U I JYdYJ
IM3"3_
lYntJY
d
(Ijd:>d) , (1jd:>d)A
UIJYdYJ un
lYI1 -/lOH
-M31Od
SNllIll 1"' II llOJ
3NYl IIOI1YIJUJJY
SNII11 1"'11 IOJ
) snlOVI Illl'O
Il'MY
"llIll 1"'11
IOVlr.l
IM3JI3d
110 I1YNIOIN I
'NI11I1MJOI
SOl
A
IMlIlJAOll
oZ
06
00'0
O1IIlOIUYJ
os
lUlU
IOrYN
'OUdS
'NIMllnl 7.lYIJAY
OZ
06
00'0
01IIl011 S JII
IOIJY J
If1lIl lIYJd
Oll
III
91
SeI
SII
S(I
SeI
SII
((I
SeI
S61
ltl
ZI
l
l'
nnu
1"' II
"!lI1OIMl
1111 I"
lOolN
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
ISOdNOJ I1JI"JII
00'0 __lnos
_"1-
OOOOS 1
61.
u
nUll
'110 11 Y1RdOd
lUlI/uYI IMl 10
YJn
_N
Y I.
o .
Y y. ool
o .911
o ZZI
09(
lSol
lei
9'1
IlS
ISl
III
9'1
lSol
l61
eSI
H
I
'Z
lUllS
10'11
"!lI1OI"1
1111 IS
_IN
nlJAJlOlON x
U1JIMl^
110 11 Y" IIlIOJ X
1101
S.AI CItlY
UJnl1 ns x
15 lYd Yl
661-01-60
d'Y
lUlU MU-oS/Hl_ 1Il1 10 _
(M"",,..)
SIU'lYMY
lU lVMY INl 10
]MIlO
MN
UYO
IS9
9ll
c
c
o
o
o
CItlIlOIUYJ
lII10tl
JYJd
IIY
OIU lYMY ,ClOIIJd
JIII1
lUlU
IOrYN
o
o
o
dNllOl1SJII
SIlO I
I CINOJ
'NIUIU
IIOI1Yl11lO1NI
11010
Y
Y
919
119'
6119
80S
6119
eos
6119
eos
"
1111
HIl
III
II
o
o
o
o
o
o
_"lnos
_MI_
'IOIlIlOJ CIIlY Id11
IIOI1JJSIIJHI
,n-,
ldU
110 11JISlUM,
Sd'r.l lYJ 11113
lSWlSYl
'110 I1JIII 0
lUllS
IOrYll
110 I1Yl1IOJ" I
'O'UI1"IOI
lYJl1l1J
lYNI
IMlIlunrov
ISl0 IM"S
1Il1YA
Olunrov
(Z'OI
SlIllYA
o,qej)
1Y1I18Y1
II'IOIl
JYld
II\'
SIIOI1IC11lOJ 'MllSlX] 1101
661'01-60 'SIU1YIIY lHl 10
U lYd Yl lUlU "lnos/MlI1lM IIIl
61. U lUllS lSJII/ISYI lMl
10
10
l_IMI UMI0
1Il1l CIIIY UYO
-
]IlY"
d'r.l
$1""1
IOMIN
"'IS
"'IS
dOlS
dOls
Cl1lI1OlI"llO" ldU
lIlnllMll1lS IdU '10111103
'10111103
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
IS
IN
SlIll
IOrYll
SlIl1'lOA
31
VII
OS'
OS'S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
III
Il
IS
I"
S"!lI1OIHl
IO"IH
IS
zz
I"
n
III
S
Il
lS
un
OS'9
OS'9
00'0
00'0
OS'9
OS'9
OS'9
OS'9
9
6S9
l6S
nlHl
sun
IOMI"
ZS
\I
((
II
"'"
OO'l
OO'l
00'0
00'0
oo'l
OO'l
oo'l
oo'l
IS
10
IflOH JYld
110 11_'"
SIIOI1101lO3 'HI1SIXl 110 11 YWIOIH I
661-01-60 'SlSllYHY lHl 10 JIII1 CItlY
ls lYd Yl lUllS HU105/HIIO" INI 10
61. IS lUllS lSlf'/UYJ lMl 10
...............
IIY
'HIUI1MJOI
I3HIO
UYO
]llYN
IIlYO
IS
z
IN
l,ysn IHYl
III
CItlY UHYl
II
10
nlll1ll
UHYl
24
Pege.3
CAPACITY AND LEVEL.OF-SERVICE
Poge.Z
FACTOIIS
ADJUSTMENT
Poge-I
..
NIERSECT IONS
UIISIGIlALIZED
HeM:
1915
RESERVE
CAPACITY
c . c
SH
SHARED
CAPACITY
(PCph)
SH
AClUAL
MOVEMEN
CAPACITY
(pcph)
M
POIEN-
TlAL
CAPACITY
c (pcph)
p
FL 011-
lATE
v(pcph)
ACCElERATION LANE
fOIl liGHT IURNS
CUll RADIUS (ft
fOIl RIGHI lUINS
liGHT TURN
ANGLE
PERCENI
GRADE
NFORMAIION
nlNG
IDEN
LOS
v
MOVEMENT
ZO
90
0.00
EAS I_
WEST_
3D
SIREET
IlAJOII
SPEED.
AVERAGE RUIlNING
ZO
90
0.00
FACIOII
PEAl IICP
51
IDa
699
n
It!
704
n
III
704
"
IZ3
704
Z6
3
6
STlEET
LEfT
TNROUGN
liGHT
MI_
NI
ZO
ZO
90
90
0.00
0.00
NOlI TNIOUIID
SOUTNIOUND
15??oo
79
SI
SlREET
PCl'ULA TlON
THE EAST/I.UT
Of
AREA
IlAM(
> 0
>C A
ZZ6
Z35
YEN I CLE COMPOS I TlON
39
105
75Z
"
16
4Da aoa
"
16
aoa
106
lZ1
aoa
55
T1
56
STREET
SI LE fT
THROUCN
liGHT
MINOR
" IlOTOIICYCLES
" COllI I NATION
VEHICLES
x SU TRUCKS
AND IV'S
LA PAZ IT
09.10.199
A.P.
IlAM( Of lME _TN/SOUIN SlIEET
(llIllIddll'Y)
THE RllRL TSI
Of THE RIIRl YSI S
Of
IIAME
DATE
> 0
>1 A
3100
o
o
o
EASI_
HOUA
PM PEAlC
TIME PIll"" AIIRLYUD.
SlREET
IlAJOII
o
o
o
WESllOUIID
COIID IT I ONS
EXISTING
OTNER INFOIIlATlON.
A
A
505
4Z3
511
431
511
43
51
431
76
I
LEfT
LEfT
EI
WI
o
o
o
NORT HIIOUIlD
RIlO CONTlOl
TYPE
INlERSECTlON
o
o
o
SOUI..-
4-LEG
TYPE
INTERSECTION
INFOIIlATlON
IDENTlFYIN'
fiNAL
TICAL
SIGHT DIST
ADJUSTMENT
ADJUSlED
VALUE
VALUES
10'Z
T AIUlRl
(lobi.
CRITICAL GAPS
EASTMST
STREET DIRECTION
MRJOII
PEAl IICP
PM
5179
LA PAZ ST
09-10'199
CONDIT IONS
NAME OF TIlE EAST MST STIEET
IIAME Of TME _TN/SOUTN STIEET
ANALYSIS.
EXISTING
DATE RIlO IME Of THE
OTHEI I NFOIIIlATI OIl.
GAP
CR
liGHTS
MINOII
SIGIl
SIGIl
STOP
SlOP
TYPI NORT IIIOJIID I
TYPI SOUTIIIOJIID.
CONIIOl
CONTlOl
5.50
5.50
0.00
0.00
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
NI
SI
LEfts
IlAJOII
VOlI.IEl
TlAFf IC
5.50
5.50
0.00
0.00
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
II
WI
THI(lJ(iHS
NI
SI
"INOII
SI
50
HI
Z4
WI
7
II
69
LEfT
6.50
6.50
0.00
0.00
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
10
479
757
INIU
LEfTS
"I NOlI
51
IS
310
IIGIlr
7.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
NI
51
LANES AIID LRIIE USAGE
IllIlIER Of
ItOUI
PEAK
PM
NFOIIIIA TI ON
OF THE EAST/WEST STIEET 51 79
Of THE NOIITN/SOUTN STlEET LA PAl Sl
AIlD TIME OF THE ANALYSIS, 09.10.199
I NFOIIIlATI ON EXISTING COIIOITIOIlS
IDENTIFYING
IIRME
NAME
DATE
OTHER
SI
Z
NI
2
WI
2
II
2
LANES
S~
[ -.6_d
UIAI]$-IO'lJ.\ll ONV AlIJVdVJ
l-'S'd
SlIOlJVI
N1IIlSnrov
..... ................
I-,eed SlIOl1JlSl]lNI anI1V"'.SHl1 'ION Sl61
.
All JVdYJ
l^llSlI
(""xl)
U I3YdYJ
OllYl/S
II
(""xl)
UIJYdYJ
iHlIIJ.\OII
1Yl1IJY
d
(""xl)
UIJYdYJ
1VI1
-NlIQd
(""xI)A
lIYI
-1'011
SNlnl lM~ II IlU
3NVl IIOI1VUUJJV
S....1 lM"1 1101
11) $OIOVI IIIlJ
n~NV
NlIll lM"1
lOV.,
NUUd
110 II YNIIO/N
'.IA
lN3ar
SOl
A
1.1II3A011
N
Ol
06
00'0
_lUll
_UYl
O[
lUllS
110/''''
'ondS 'NI.1lf11 r.lnJ.\v
NS
NS
II013Vl
.-oN
JYld
B311S
IIONIII
III
06
00'0
CIHI"OIM 1110.
OOOOS I
110 11 V1fldOd
YlIY
v
V
'66
LS/.
866
~L
866
t9L
866
L9L
,
8
N'.I
1111 n
Ol
06
00'0
ONnolN lnos
'01
OOV I1NYS
BUlS lUII/lSYl
1II1
10
lIlY.
110111 SOdlClJ nJ I MJ.\
lnllS
lIOr",
'01
YIII"I'"
'd"V
lUllS MInos/MIllON 3111 10 lIIYIl
SAlVNY
lMl
10 lIIYN
[66
L66
L66
L66
un IN
U1JAJlIOI0II 1Ii
U1JIM3A
IIOI1YNllNOJ 1Ii
S,AI allY
SJJI111 os 1Ii
661-01-60
( /J.tppfWa)
IISAlYIlY
lMl
10
lIVO
o
o
o
CIllI10llSYl
InoM
JVld
IIY
'onAlYNY OOllld 1Il11
1I01I"'1I01NI 'NUl
SIIOIIIGllOJ 'NIJSlXl '1IOIIYIIlIOI.1 UN10
IIY ! 661-01-60 'SISA1VNY 1II1 10 illllI IIIV llVO
01 VII..,"" lUllS .lnos/Nll1O. lNl j(J lIIYN
"al OOYII.V$ lU11I lSlrI/1SV3 lNI j(J lIIYN
lN101
o
o
o
o
o
o
_Minos
_Nl_
0Hfl0t lS3I\
SIlO I
10Il0J
'.IIIIU
'I0111lOJ GlIV idAl
'1IOIJYllIIOlX
IIOIIJlSl)lNI
UNlO
InoM lI'/'ld
IIOIJJlSUINI
'idAl
IIOI1'lSI)INI
Sd" 1.,
.,
.lnos/.ll1O.
'1101131110 lUllS
IIOtYII
d"
lVJlII.,
lY."
lNlIIlsnrOV
ISIO IN'IS
lIllYA
OllsnrGY
(Z.OI .1Q-U
SlIllVA IVlIlIY1
"'IS dOli
OfII1OtlSYl ldU
'1011110'
OS'
00'0
OS'S
OS"S
SIN'"
n
110.111
S N1lOA
JI IIVU
SUll
IIOrYII
IS
1M
11\
n
OS.S
00'0
OS'S
OS"S
IN
"
,
In1
OO"L
00'0
OO'L
OO'l
n
sun
lION11I
6S
'Z
o
IIIU
110 IJYllIIOIN I 'NIAlIJ.101
SIIOIJIOIlOJ 'NIJSlXl . 110 IJYllIIOIN I 11NI0
IIY : 661-01-60 "SISA1YNV iMI 10 11111 ONV lIVO
'01 YUI"IYII . IUIII MlnoS/MlION iNI 10 lIIYN
'01 OOVI1NYS InllS 1131\/IIYl lMl j(J lllYN
6
,
1"'1
II10N
JY3d
IS
I.
11\
UNVl
n
Z
j(J UIIIIIH
SlIlYl
S~
[-.Sed
MS
. . .
UIJYdYJ
3AUSJI
MS
(.pod) .
All JYdYJ
OJlYMS
N
(.pod) .
UIJVdYJ
IM3II3^OM
lmlJV
lJl^US-JO-n^31 O"V AlIJVdYJ
d
(.pod) . (.pod)A
AlIJVdVJ 31n
lY 11 -mll
- II3IDd
z-oSed
5"11I11 IM9I1 IOJ
3"V1 IIOIIVUnJJY
SII1I11 1M~ II 101
Illl smowI IlIIt)
il~IIY
111111 IM9I1
SIOIJVJ
3OWI~
!N3J13d
1"3NISnrow
..e.d
SIlOIIJUUI"
au
110 II YlIIOJ"
WM, ISNn
'"11
'10-
5161
!N301
SOl
1113N3MIl
oz
06
00'0
0"11081 sn
O[
nJlu
IOrYll
'OUdS '"I"NflI 3'Yl3AY
OIlI1OI1S3ft
'1OIJVl
IIlOlI lY3d
133111
_III
II
oz
06
00'0
0IlIl01_1101I
??oo51
'1I01IY11WOd
nlY
Y
Y
~16
m
S66
SolS
S66
SolS
S66
08S
6
[l
IM9I1
Hil
II
oz
06
00'0
ONnoIM lnos
'01
O!IYllm
nuu
U3IIIISYJ 3MI 10
JIIY1l
n311S
IOrYll
110 111 SOdNOJ
nJIM3A
'01 VI
IIY!JIYlI
'd'Y
lUlU Mlnos/MlIOII IMI 10
ISAlYIIY
3MI
j() JIIY"
JIIY1l
Y
~61
016
016
016
[I
HIl III
nlJAJI01011 X
nlJlM3A
11011 YII IIllDJ X
S.^IOIlY
SJ:llllI ns I
661'01-60
(/.A/PP"")
S1SAlYllY lIlt 10 31 YO
o
o
o
OlInoIUYI
IIlOII lYld
lid
OiU lYllY 001l3d 31111
110 11 YlIIOl II
SIIOIIIOIIOJ ~"IUIXJ '1IOIIYlII01111 UM10
~Yld lid : 661-01-60 'SISAlYIIY IM1 10 31111 OIlY 31YO
'01 YIIIIY!JIYIl lUllS Mlnos/.._ 3111 JO _II
'01 O!IYIIIIYS nJIIS UWUYJ IMI JO JllYII
'"IUI!N301
o
o
o
0IlIl01 U 3ft
ONnoS_I_
SIlO 111 CIlOJ
~1I11S1X3
101I1lOJ OIlY IdAl
'1I011YlI101III
IlOIIJJSUI"1
UMIO
III1ltl
o
o
o
CIIlI1OlMlnos
IOIIJ35IUIII-I 13dll
IIOIIJ3SUIIII
SdYll m IIIIJ
11I1lS/1I1_
'1OI1JIIIO lUllS
-
lYJllI1J
lYIIU
1I311lsnrow
1510 1M9IS
JI11Y^
ousnrow
Z-Ol
SJIllY^
l1qeU
1Y1I1IY I
"'IS
d01S.
'OMrIlIISY3 Idll
10111lOJ
dYll
S1M~ II
10"111
S JIfl1O.\
JI HYII
OS'S
00'0
OS'S
OS'S
II
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
SHIl
IOrYll
n
IN
11\
II
00.0
III
o
ZI
Zl
un
OO'~
00'0
OO-~
OO'l
13
sun
1011111
'~I
101
o
IlIIlI
10 IIYl1101N I
SIlOIIIOIlOJ ~NI15IXi IIOI1Yl1101NI UMIO
~nd lid : 661-01-60 'SISA1YIY 3MI 10 11111 OIlY 3!YO
'01 YlIlIY!JIYlI lUlU Unos/MlION 3MI 10 IIIYN
'01 O!Iyum lUllS 15311115n iMl 10 JIIYll
~NIU1I1I301
[
6
.
IM"I
III1ltl
UNY1 10
U.....
IS
Z
II
Z
1/1
II
Z
SJIlYl
9~
[ -.Ied
IS
>
AII]VdY]
J.\usn
IS
(I/Cf>d)
UI]Vn:I
OilYIIS
II
(Ifd>d)
AII]Vn:I
II:JNlo\OII
lYl11]V
i]IAln-40.UAil
d
Ifd>d) > (1fd>d)A
UI]VdY] Jill
lYl1 '/lO14
IIUDd
CIIlV U
]VdO
l-,'od
II
SIIlII11 111"1 104
i"V' 11011 VUU]]V
SIIII11 111'11 104
) SO I Oil .110
Jl'"V
IlIfll 111'11
SIOI]V J lNilllSnrOV
JOV.,
INl]Ud
.....
I....
SIIOI1]iSUlNl
OilllY""S""
IIOI1YNI04"
:1011
,"Ul
S861
0301
SOl
A
l"lNJAOII
Ol
06
00'0
CIIlRlll15YJ
O[
lUllS
IOfYN
'ondS '"1"""1 r.llllo\V
Ol
06
00'0
CHlflOIIUIl
'IOI]U
lIIlOII lIYJd
v
V
V
166
[SS
L"
966
SS5
[6'
966
SSS
[et
966
6SS
Let
9
I
9
HnlS
111'11
119f1ll1111
un .i
10"111
Ol
Ol
06
06
00.0
110 111 SOdNO] n" llo\
00' 0 CIIlRllllll1lS
Clllf'l)11I1_
OOOOS I
01 VIIn9IYl1
nnlS
IIOI1V'fWOd
uWlsn Jill
nlY
10 MI
lUllS
IONtIl
01 Vl01llOd
d'V
iO
lUlU 1I111lS/IIIION illl
IU1Y1lY illl
10 _I
10_
V
V
V
S66
S'S
6l,
L66
9'S
I"
L66
9'S
I"
L66
ass
911'
111'11
119f1ll1111
Ui,
11II
UUA]IOI011 :II
n1]IHlA
IIOI1YHIIII)] II
S.AI CIIlY
Sl:l/111 ns II
661-01-60
(IJ.tpp/W)
USAlYIIY JIll 10
IIVO
o
o
o
CIIlI1OI1I1_
0IIf10I1 S III
_ISVJ
lInOlI IYJd NY
onnYllY CIlIIJd lNl1
lUllS
IOfYll
o
o
o
5110 111 CIIlIn
'"11511]
110 11 YIlIO 4 Nt
IJIII0
V
V
In
lII8
168
[n
168
m
168
sn
un III
Ull IS
o
o
o
01
1011110]
ClllYUU
IIOI1]]SU11.
o
o
o
CIIlI1OIIIll1lS
,nO'
J4U
1101 nlS131N
IIOI1Y1l1OIMI '''AlI1MlOI
SdYlI 101111:1
HlIIlS/II1_
:1I011]JIIO
lUllS
IOfYll
SIIOIIIOIIO] 'NI
NY : 661-01.60
.01 Y1OlllOd lO
'01 YlIl",IYIl
SIXl IIOI1Y1l104MI
'SIU1YIIY iMl 40 lNl1 CIIIY
nl1s 11/IlS/N1_ lNl 40
'IUIIS UJll/l$YJ Jill 40
JNYIl
JllYI
d",
lY]
1..U
I1lN1SMOV
1$10 IN'IS
JIl1YA
OIlSOfOV
(l-Ol olllWll
SJIl1YA 111I1IYl
",IS
dOU
'CIIlrotlUYJ ldl!
101INO:J
lnoM
IVld
I3NI0
UYO
11:1
511"1
IONtIl
'''5
d015
'CIIlI'OIISlII JdU
1011NO:J
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00.0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
11II
IJ
sun
IOfYll
uwn'lOA
]IHYll
OS'S
OS'
00.0
00.0
OS'S
OS.S
OS'S
OS'S
'N
.S
11II
IJ
SII!lIlllINI
IONIII
IS
IN
6
III
Ii
un
OS.,
OS.,
00'0
00'0
os.,
OS'9
OS"
OS'9
LI
SOl
/11111
SUll
IO"M
8l
l
1",11
oo'L
oo.L
00'0
00'0
OO'L
OO'L
oo'L
oo.L
11II
n
)!IYSO
J"Y' aNY UNn 40
I3Ml1l
lIIlOII
110 11 YIl1lO 4 N I
SIIOJlIOIlO] 9N11S1Xi NO JlYllllOJN I nlllO
IYJd NY : 661-01'60 .'S1snv"v llll 40 illl1 OIlY lUO
01 V1OlllOd lO -lUlU HI/IlS/II1ION illl lO MI
01 YlIn9IY1l Inl1S UJ/l/UYi iNl 40 MN
,"IUI1NJOI
IS
s
IN
11\
s
n
[
UNY'
9~
{ ..eed
3'IAU5-jO-UA31 aNY AlI'YdY'
Z..eOd
51101,Yj
lN3Munrav
..1-4
511OI1J3SIU"
an
lY1l' I 511fl
10"
5861
M5
. .
AU'YdYJ
~U5n
Ijdod)
111'YdYJ
anYMS
lN3M3Ml11
lYOl'Y
lY
MUOd
(ljdod)A
UVI
-/IOU
5"llfll 1M' II IIOj
3"Yl IIOI1YUUJJY
'"11I1 1M" I IIOj
) $Olavl 1111:I
31,"y
"1m 1M" I
3OYI'
l"nUd
IIOI1YWlIOj"
'"IA
1"301
II
(ljdod) .
11 'YdY'
d
Ijdod) .
11 "YdY'
1"311Vo011
aZ
06
00"0
0IIfl011 5 YJ
O{
nulS
IIOryw
aHdS '"I"1Ifl1 39Y1~Y
501
A
MS
OZ
06
00.0
OIIflOe lS 311
IIOnYl
lnoM JYJd
Y
Y
Y
Z66
O'l
ZS9
666
"l
U9
666
"l
U9
666
"l
089
l
I
SZ
nulS
lM"1
M,nolMl
HJl
110"111
13
"
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
00'0
_Ml_
0IIII)IM111)$
000051
01 Yl
...,IYW
HilS
"110 In1lW04
lS3II/1SY3 3Ml
yny
m_
nulS
110"111
11011
50d1l0:1
Jl'I"~
01 Y101_
d"Y
30
nulS "1I1)$/M1_
IU 'YIIY
IMl
IU
m_
lO 3IIY1l
Y
Y
Y
l66
6U
899
666
O,l
699
666
O'l
699
666
{U
Sl9
1M' II
"9f101Ml
HJl
III
n"lJ1I01011 x
nl"M~
flOI1V1lIIllO' X
S.AI OIly
SJ:>rIIl ns x
661'01-60
(M"",,,,,")
SIU1Yl1Y 3Ml lO
UYO
o
o
o
o
o
o
_lS311
_lSYJ
IflOM JYJd
114
0lU1Yl1Y Cl>lnd 31111
lHllS
IIOrVII
SIIOI1I011O' '"llSIU
'1I011_1"1
13"10
Y
Y
166
566
966
966
966
966
966
966
,
I
1131 I"
HJl IS
o
o
o
OIIII)IM 1_
1011110:) CIlIY
Id11
IIOU'iSnl"1
o
o
o
_Mll1)$
'Jl.'
13d11
flOU'i5nl"1
SdY9 lYJl1lD
flOl1_j"1 ONIUllUOI
Z-Ol
nnlVA
el"""
1Y1I1IYl
Nll1)$/"ll1O"
,,,>lS
d01S
IflOll,nlO
_ISY3 1411
lHIlS
1OUIlO:)
IIOI'VII
IIIllII
5*'111011O'
JY3d Nd : 661-01-60
'01 Y101110d 30
. 01 Y U IY91Y1l
'"IlSIU
'UU1Y"V 3M
lUllS UI1)$/MI_ IMI jO
lUllS U3II/UYI 3Ml jO
. 110 IlYWlIOl" I
1 lO IMIl CIlIY
UM10
Ino
MN
MN
dY9
lYJ I 111]
lV"1I
lNJlllsnrav
UIO IM"S
3IIlY^
OJunrav
11\
13
SlM"1
110II111
"'IS
dOlS
IClIflOIlS311 1411
1OUIIO:)
05'5
05'5
00'0
00"0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
SUll
IIOrVII
SMl'lOA
"UVll
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS.S
OS'S
OS'S
I"
15
110" IN
IS
IN
III
II
a
Ull
11\
13
SM9f1OINl
OS'9
OS'9
00'0
00'0
OS'9
OS'9
OS'9
OS'9
S8
"
nllll
SUll
DIN
{
9
1"'''
OO'l
OO'l
00'0
00'0
OO'l
OO'l
OO'l
OO'l
11\
n
J!lY$O
3"Yl
OIlY
n"Yl
m nllf1ll
II1llI
nld
flOllYWlIOj"
5110111011O' '"I1SIXI
114 : 661-01-60
'01 Y1OIIIOd 10
. 01 Y 1I...,1YIl
IIOIlYWlIOj"
'5 UlY"V 3MI 10 31111
lUllS MII1)$/M111O" 3tH
nnlS lS3II/lSYJ IMl
'"IUIl"IOI
OIlY
10
10
UM10
UYO
MN
MN
IS
{
I"
{
III
{
n
{
SJtlYl
8~
.ee"
3JIAIU-10-UA31 aMY
AI IJYdYJ
z.ae-d
SI01JY I
lM3NlSnroy
...
1..ee..
SIlO
IJJSIJIM
on
lVM' ISMn
'lOW 5861
MS
. .
111 JYdYJ
3o\US3I
IJYdYJ
03IYMS
(ljdod)
UIJYdYJ
lM3N3M>M
lV01JY
lYI1
M3IO<I
(ljdod)^
UYl
-11]11
SMII11 1M" I 101
3MY1 IIOI1YUUJJY
SI1II11 lM"1 101
I> SnlOYI '1II1J
n'MY
11111 1M'"
3OYI'
lM3JUd
11011,,"1011
'MIUI1M301
S01
^
(ljdod)
U
"
.
(ljdod) .
UIJYdYJ
lM3Il3MM
OZ
06
00'0
OIlIlO'1SYI
O[
lnl1S
IOrvw
. ondS ,M I Mnn. r.!YUAY
MS
d
I
OZ
06
00'0
OIlllO'ISJII
IOIJYI
II1)M lIVid
Y
,
J
116
9[[
az
lM
16[
'ltZ
166
16[
,[Z
166
6"
61[
01
[9
,
lnln
1M'"
1!lIlOIMl
1111
lOll"
'"
I
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
ISOdIlOJ I1JIM3o\
00'0 _Mlf'OS
_M I 101I
OOOOSl
6J.
IS
lnllS
110 11 Y1IldOoI
lSW1Sn IMI
10
nIY
JWYll
1[6
SOt
'ltZ
986
96[
ZVZ
986
96[
ZVZ
986
l"
ZS[
55
16
"
1)3115
I""
M!lIlOIMI
1111
_IN
IS
$)1J1J101011 I
$)1JIM3o\
110 11 YllIIllOJ
I
11011
S.AI CIIlY
SJJIlll ns
x
01 YlIllWIVW
'd'Y
661-01-60
1)3115 Mlf'OS/MIIIOI 1M
(MIPP/Wl
lU1YMY
SIU1YMY IMl 10 UYO
IMI
10
10
JIlY1l
JllYI
Y ,.
, .
S9[
o
o
o
_MlIOI
OIlIlOIIISJII
OIlIlOII1SYI
11I1OII
lIYld
NY
0lU1YMY 00lU4
JIlI1
lnllS
_VII
o
o
o
SlIOl1ll1NOJ ,MlnHI
. 110 11 VllIOINI
UIIO
916
[99
IZ6
ill
IZ6
ill
IZ6
ill
Y
Y
ZI
'ZI
lnl
1111
WI
n
o
o
o
10111lOJ
aNY IdU
IIOI1JJSU1MI
o
o
o
OlnIIMlf'OS
'11-'
IdU
IIOI1JJSUlMI
lIrlOl JYld
SIlO I
NY : 661-01-60
. 01 Y 1I1-r.11V11
6J. IS
1I011V1110111 '"IUI1I101
lIl1NOJ ,"I1SIXJ ....IIOI1V11IOINI IJIlI0
. UU lVIY JIll 10 3Il11 OIlY liYO
U3IU Mlf'OStMl1011 JIll 10 JllYI
lnlU UW1SYJ JIll 10 JllYI
m
lnl1l1J
lVIII
1131l1snrOY
UIO lM"S
JfllY^
ousnrOY
Z-Ol el.1)
SJfllY^ 1Y1IlIV1
sm mllllJ
SIM"1
lOll"
UJI'I/UYJ
"'IS
""S
40IS
4015
:1101133110
OlV1O'Ml101 IdU
14U
onnotIMlf'OS
lnllS
10111lOJ
10111lOJ
_VII
05'5
05'5
00'0
00'0
05'5
05'5
05'5
05'5
IS
IN
slln
IOrVII
nWll1O/\
JIIIYlI
05'5
05'5
00'0
00'0
OS'S
05'5
05'5
05-5
WI
'I
'S
"
IN
WI
II
n
(l
UI1
05'9
05'9
00'0
00'0
05'9
05'9
05'9
05'9
'S
IN
SM!lIlOIMI lOll"
n
is
lSZ
01
""l!
sun
_I"
OS
6
"
'5
1M" I
oo'l
OO'l
00'0
00-0
oo'l
oo'l
oo'l
oo'l
'S
'"
J!JYSIl
IIY1
OIlY
$)IYl
10 UNlll
II1lIl
)YJ4
1I011V111011
SIIOI1I01lOJ '"I1SIXJ '1I011V11IOINI UN10
NY : 661-01-60 'SIU1YIIY INl 10 3Il11 OIlY UYO
'01 YUIWIYIl l1111S Ilf'OStMlIlOI INl 10 JllYI
6J. IS InllS lSWUYI INl 10 JIlYI
'"111111101
'S
'"
[
WI
II
(
SlIIY1
8~
{..Sed
3JIA135-~0-1lA3' OIlV UIJVdYJ
Z-aS1d
51101JV~ I11lW15nrOV
~.e.d
511011J35131111
an
W",15Nn
'10M
SI61
liS I
, . ,
UIJVdYJ
lAnnl
(Ijd:>d)
UIJVdYJ
a31VII5
M
(ljdad) ,
UIJVdYJ
I11lM3AOII
lVmJV
lVI1
IIUOd
(1jd:>d)A
UYI
"/'Ol~
51111111 lM'11 110'
311Vl 1I011V1]1IJJV
SNIf'll lM"1 1IO~
H) snlOVI 11I1J
11'HY
IIll111 111"1
IOV.,
1M1J13d
110 11 VIIllO ~ II
,IIIUI10al
SOl
A
,
d
eqd:>d) ,
UIJVdYJ
lNlWJAOll
oz
06
00'0
_Ml_
_ISiIl
_ISVI
O{
lUllS
lIOrVII
'audS '"1"""1
r.lVllAV
NS
Ol
06
00'0
'1I01JVI
II1lIl :RId
v
v
I
066
'"
Ol{
t66
In
l~
'66
l"
l~
'66
09'
Si{
,
I{
'l
lUllS
111'11
M,nolMl
un III
_1M
Ol
Ol
06
06
00'0
ISOdIIlJ nJINJA
00'0 _Minos
OOOOS 1
6l
IS
lUllS
'110 11 V1/IdOd
lSiIl/lSVl
J1Il
,a
VJlV
-
v V< Il6
V <00
J sa
966 619
,St
{9[
'66
'S'
{9[
'66
119'
06{
Sl
'l
119
lUllS
IN''1
N!lI1OlMl
1131 IS
lION 1M
U1J1J1I01011 I
SJ1JIMlA
1I011V11II1<<lJ II
1101
S.AI OIlY
SJJIlll ns
I
'01
V 11 IWIVll
'd'V
661'01"60
lUllS ..no5/.._
eM"",,..)
3Ml
lS11VIIV lMl
IIIIWIIV 3MI
10_
10_
10
IIVG
OIS
o
o
o
CIIlI1OlI1I1_
_lli1l
_lSV3
InoII
JYJd Md
'aunVllv 00113<1 lWl1
lUllS
lIOrVII
a
o
o
SIIOI1I011OJ '1I11S113
'1011_,NI
131110
VOL
l{I
16l
UI
v
v
16l
UI
16l
UI
{
0'
un
In'
11\
n
o
a
o
'lOIlIOJ OIlV HU
IIOI1J]$131111
a
o
o
OIIf1lIIMlnos
'31-'
3dll
IOI1JJSnlNI
IOI1V11l1O'NI 'NIUI1Nlal
SdW
lYJllIlJ
lSlIII lSV3
lllOI1J311a lUllS
_VII
lIIIlII
JV3d
51lO11IallOJ '1I11Slll
lid : 661-01-60 'SIUWNV 3MI
'01 VlIIWIVII lUllS Mlnos/Nl_ 3MI
6l IS nulS lSlII/11YJ 3Ml
'0 lWVN
JO lWVII
IIOI1V11l1O'NI 13Ml0
~o lW 11 OIIV U va
dW
WJllIlJ
lVNU
lMlWlSnrov
lSla lM"S
JIIWA
ausnrov
(l-Ol e)qlU
SJlllVA 1Y1IIIVl
51M'1I
11011 1M
"'IS
"'IS
d01S
dOlS
'CIflI'IOIMlnos
: OlII1OIIl_
ldll
ldl1
101111lD
1OIIIIOJ
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
OS'S
IS
III
sun
I01'VII
SJMI110A
~ IIlYl1
OS'S
OS'S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS"S
OS'S
OS'S
11\
n
IS
III
11\
n
l'
,l
{
9[
un
OS.,
OS.,
00'0
00'0
OS"
OS.,
OS"'
OS.,
IS
III
SM!lI1OIM 1
_1M
II
Il
,,,
{6l
IIlIMl
SUll
lIONIM
{l
,
6l
,
1",11
OO'l
OO'l
00'0
00'0
OO-l
OO'l
OO'l
OO'l
IS
III
"vsn 311Vl
CIIIY
UNVl
~o nN1ll
1110II :R3d
Mol : 661-01"60
01 VlIIWIVII
6l IS
1I011_~N
JIlO~ '1111510 '1I011V111O~1I1 13Ml0
'SIU1VIIV 3111 ~O lWl1 OIlV uva
lUllS Nlnos/Mll1ON 3Ml ~O lWVN
nulS nJ/\/ lSYJ 3MI ~o lWVII
'NU~1111l01
IS
l
IN
{
1/1
{
II
{
SlIIYl
ot
(~.l!I.cI
JJIAUS-~O-HII3'
ONY
AI I JYdYJ
l-.50d
SIIOIJY~ !NJllunroy
..,-..
SIlO I IJJSU!N'
oUnYN"S,," '10M
5161
MS
, . ,
AI IJYcIYJ
JAUUI
MS
,pod)
AI I JYdYJ
ollYMS
II
,pod)
AI IJYcIYJ
iNJllJAON
'YnlJY
'YI
-NUOd
(,pod)A
un
-IlllH
SNlnI IM"I IIO~
l"Yl IIOUYUUJJY
"lIli tM" I IIO~
H) snlOYI IlIllJ
J"NY
Nlnl iM"1
JOY.,
i"JJlJd
NO I! YllIlO~"
'" I U I!NJol
SOl
A
d
(,pod)
UIJYcIYJ
!NJllJAOII
CIN/1OI1 sn
O[
nuu
IIOrYll
'oUdS '" I ""nl J'YUAY
N
Ol
06
00'0
OIlRlIUJII
IIO!JY~
Il10tl
,nd
nun
lION III
Ol
06
00'0
_MIllON
??oo51
NOI!Yll\d04
nn
Y
Y
569
US
'166
SlS
966
SlS
966
liS
OO[
"
IM"I
HJ'
III
N
Ol
06
00'0
onnolM!I'OS
AYII YNJUS Y'
InlU
nJIII ISU JMI
1O JllYN
J'''MJII
nilu
IOrYII
110 I!
I SOoIIIOJ
'01 YUIWIYII
'd'Y
nUls M!I'OS/M!IION JNI ~o
UnYNY JM
~O
JIMl
_N
Y
106
616
616
616
61
un IS
U'JAJIOIOII X
U'JIMJII
110 I! YN IIIlOJ X
S.AI OIlY
S'JIllli 11$
x
661'01-60
(1J.1P9~)
SlU'YNY JMl
1O
J1Ya
OIlIlOusn
If10II
'YJd
NY
OJU'YNY oolIJd
JIll!
NOI!YllIO~NI 'NIlJ
SIlOIUOIlOJ 'NI!SI'J ., "IIOI!YllIO~NI
:lYJd NY : 661-01-60 SIU'YIIY JMl JO JIll! OIlY
'01 YUI"IYll nus M!I'OS/M1_ JMl ~O
AYII YNilJS Y' nJIIS UJII/UYJ JMI ~O
!NJal
JllYI
JIMl
o
o
o
a
a
o
OllllOUSJII
_Mi_
SIIOU
CIIIOJ
'NlnlU
'lOIIIlOJ
'1lOI!YIIIO~NI
OIlY JdAl
nlUo
IlOI!JlSnUI
o
onnolMll'OS
IInOM
nMIO
UYO
o
o
IIOI!JJSIUNI-l
'JdAI
NO
JlSnll'
ScIW 'YJIUIIJ
l11'OS/1U101
:NOUJJIIo
InlU
lIO/'Y11
d., ,YJ U
lYNU
IJ
INJIIunroy
ISla iN"S
JII'YA
ousnroy
Z-Ol
Un'YA
el... U
"'lOIn
"'IS
cIOn
ollOOlnJII JdAl
'lOIUlOJ
OS'
OS'S
III
SIN"I
ION III
S JIf'I 'lOA
JIUnl
OS'
00'0
SUJ'
IOrYII
IS
IN
1/1
Ii
05'5
00'0
05'5
05'5
IS
II
II
6[
un
OO'l
00'0
OO'l
OO-l
III
sun
ION III
II
60l
nlMl
SIlO I! IOIIOJ
NY : 661-01-60
'01 nJlWIYII
tYII YIlJns Y'
IlOUYlIIO~NI '"IUIUlJOI
'NUSlHJ IIOI!YllIO~NI
'SlU'YNY JNl ~O Jill! OIlY
nilu IUl'OS/MllON JNl
inlU 1531VnYJ JNl
JO
JO
_I
JllYI
[
51
tll
tM" I
WlDN nJd
UN10
JIYO
UNY' ~O nl_
IS
l
IN
l
1/1
l
IJ
UNY'
0&
( -OOOd
JJIAIlS-IO-UMl
OIlY 111JYdYJ
Z-oOOd
SlIOnYI
lNJIUSnrllY
-OOOd
SlIOlnJSIJlN
OJZ
lYll!)lSM :IOM
5861
MS
> . >
UIJYdYJ
JAIlSJI
MS
(Ifd:ld) >
UIJYdYJ
OJIMlS
N
(Ifd:ld )
ll1JYdYJ
'"lNJ_
lYI11JY
lYI1
MJIOd
(1fd:ld)A
UYI
-/101 I
SN~nl IM"I 101
JNYl IIOI1YIlUJJY
S"~IU IM"I 101
H) snlllYI IIIlJ
Jl'lIY
"11I1 1M'"
SOl
A
d
(Ifd:ld)
UIJYdYJ
lMlNJ/IOIl
OZ
06
91l
"
S6l
(6Z
50l
{ez
S6l
IZ(
8L
(5Z
IUUS
M"I
IHl
10M I N
11\
"
OZ
OZ
06
06
IIOIIISOdIlOJ J1JIMJA
00'0 _Minos
00'0 _UIOM
00' 0 _'Ull
.. _,sn
JlIYlr.I
IMJJUd
IIOIiYNIOIN
'"IUI1"JOI
O{
IU~lS
lIOI'YN
'OUdS '"INMI ir.lYlJAY
IOIJYI
II1llII lIYJd
??oo5 I
1Y11 Y"JIlS Yl
UUS
'110 11 Y 1IldOd
n:w./lSYJ JU
YJIY
10 JNY"
Y
uun
IIOrYN
'01 YlIlY'JlYII
d'y
IUln
Minos/MIlO"
IU lYIIY
JMI 10
JMI 10
-"
JNY"
Y
L8,
Z9S
Z9S
Z9S
SoL
1IJ
IS
U1J1JIOION 11
U1JIMJA
110 llYN IIIIOJ 11
S.^~ OIlY
UJIlU ns 11
661-01-60
(AA/IlP,...)
IIU1YIIY
JU 10 JnO
_,sn
II1llII
Jnd
lid
'OJUlYlIY OOIIJd
Jill
110 11 YIlIOI" I
SlIOllIOIlOJ '"llSlX)
II10M lIYJd Nd : 661-01-60 '1IU1YIIY
'01 YIIIY'~YN
lY11 "NJUS Yl
JM
lUllS ""IOSlMI_ JMI
IUUS lSJlllnn JU
'"IUI1"JOI
'1IOI1Y1l1OI"1 IlMIO
I 10 JIlI1 OIlY JIYO
10 _.
10 _.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
OMrotlSJII
_Minos
_UIOM
SIlO Ii
1011O)
,MllSIXJ
lOUIIOJ OIlY JdU
'1IOI1YNIOI"1
IIOI1JJSIJ1.1
1J1110
IIOI1JJSIJIMI-I
JdU
IIOI1JJSIlIM.
SdY!I lYJ1111J
Mlnos/MllOM 'IIOInJlIO
lUllS
lIOI'YN
dY!J
lYJllIlJ
lYMU
'"lNISnrllY
nlo 1M"S
JI11YA
ousnrllY
Z-Ol elqeu
SJI1lYA Innl.,
"'II
<IOU
'CIlII1OIUJII
Jdll
10111lOJ
11\
UM'"
_IN
S_lOA
JUIYU
OS'S
00'0
OS-S
OS'S
SlIJl
IOrYN
IS
I.
11\
n
OS'S
00'0
OS'S
os
IS
"
LI
OU
IIJl
OO'L
00'0
OO'L
OO'L
11\
SlIJl
IIOMIN
ZZ
LIZ
60Z
IlIMI
110 11 YNIIOIM
SIIOIIIOIlOJ 'MI1I1XJ
IflOM lIYJd Nd : 661-01'60
-01 YlIl.,1YII
1 YII YUln Yl
'SI511YNY JMI 10
UJIlS MI/lOS/MllO" JMI
IUUS lSJIII1SYJ JMI
'"I1II1MJOI
10
10
JllYH
JllYM
l
'Ll
Il
llI!l"
U"Yl 10 IJINlM
IIOI1YNIOI"1 UMIO
JIII1 OIlY Jno
IS
Z
1M
Z
11\
n
unl
P.e.-3
LOS
D
A
A
v
137
841
710
IfSElVE
CAPAC I "
. c
SN
SNARED
CAPACITY
(pcph
309
929
768
PEA/( HWll
FUIII'
RATE
v(PCph)
72
lIll
57
IDEITlfYllG IIFOIMATlOII
_ OF TIE EASTIllEST STREET IIIICIlESTEI RO.
IAIlE OF THE IDIITH/SOUTH STlEET llCOlAS RD.
DATE AIID TIllE OF TME AIIALYSIS. 09.10'199 : All
OTMER IIFOIIlATlOII.... EXISTlIG CQIIOITlOIIS
SN
AC TUAL
IIOYEIlEI
CAPAC ITY
c(pcph
"
309
929
768
LEVEL-OF-SElVICE
POlEI
TlAL
CAPACITY
(pcph)
123
929
768
p
CAPACITY AIIO
IlCIYEIlEIT
STIfET
UFT
RIGNT
STlEET
"1-
WI
MAJOI
UFT
sa
ADJUSTIlEHT fACTDIIS P'e.-2
~.. ~...... -.... ~.... ............ .......
PElCENT RIGHT TURI CURl RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATlOII LANE
GRADE AIIGLI FDII RIGNT TURIS FOI RIGNI TURNS
.......... ................ ...............-........ .........................
EAS IIllU1lD .......... -.. ...
IlESTIWHO O.DO 90 20 I
_TH_ D.DO 90 20 I
SOUTH_ O.DO 90 20 I
VEIICU CllIIPOSlTlOII
-...............................................-........-.......-.................--..........................-......
X SU TlUCKS X CCIIIIIlATlOII
AIID IV'S VEHICLES X IlOTOICYCLES
.................. ...............-........ ........--.....-...
EASTIWHO ... '" ...
IlESTIWHO 0 0 0
_11IIQ.llD 0 0 0
SOUTHIWHO 0 0 0
CRITICAL GAPS
............................................--.........-..--...-..........-...............-....................
IAIUlAR VALUES AD.lUSTED SlGIIT OIST. fI IAL
(Tebl. 10-2) VAlUE ADJUSTIlEIT CR ITI CAL GAP
..............-....- ........... ...-............- ...........
"1101 RIGIITS
WI 5.50 5.50 O.DO 5.50
MAJOI LEf TS
SI 5.50 5.50 O.DO 5.50
"IIDII LEfTS
WI 7,DO 7.DO O.DO 7.DO
IDENTlfTllG INFOIIlATlOII
--..............-..-..........--....................--......-...............--..-..-....
NAIlE OF THE EASTIllEST STlEET...... IIINCHESTEI RO,
NAIlE OF THE NOITH/SOUTH STlEET.... IICOlAS RD.
DATE AIID TIllE OF TME ANALYSiS..,.. 09'10'199 ; All PEA/( HaJII
OTHEI INFOIIlATlOII.... EXISTlIG CllIIDITIOIIS
'.8.-
33
1985 HeM: UIISICIIAUZED INTUSECTlOIIS
.............. ...... ............ .....
IDENTlFT!NG INfOllIlATlOII
-....................................................-..
AVE lAG( RUf/NIHG SPUD, IlAJOR STREET.. 30
PUK IlQJR fACTOI...,..............,.. I
AREA I'OPULAT 1011..,.................., 15??oo
_ OF fNE EASTIllEST UIUT......... IIINCHESTER 10.
IIAHE OF THE IIORfN/SOUIH UREET..,.... NICOlAS RD.
_ OF THE AllALUT.........,........ A.P.
DATE 01 THE AllAUSIS l..,cldlyy)...,.. 09'10'199
TlIlI HRlIIl AJlALUED..............,., All PEA/( HWll
OTHEI INFOIIlATlOII.... ENISTING CllIIDITIOIIS
IITERSECTIOII TYPE AlII COIITROl
....--.........................--......-........-..... ...
INTERSECflOII TYPE. T'INTERSECTlOII
MAJOR STREET DIIECTlOII. _TH'SOUTH
COIITROl TY'E IlEST_. STOP SIGII
TRAffiC VOllJl(S
---......................... '.... ......... '-
n WI NI $I
......- ...... ,.. ...
LEFT ., 156 22D 52
TIIRU ., 231 56 447
IIGIIT .. SO 269 52
IUllEI or LANES
.......- .- .. ,. ..
n 1/1 NI sa
LAllES 2 2 0
P.ge-l
LEVEL-Of-SERVICE
CAPACITY AND
Pog.-2
ADJUSTMENT f"CTOIlS
,...
LOS
..
IESERVE
CAPACITY
c . c
SHAIlEo
CAPACITY
(pcph)
SN
ACTUAL
NOVEMEN
CAPACITY
c (pcph
H
POTEN
fLOlI. TlAL
IIATE CAPACln
..(pcph) c (pcph)
p
MOVEMENT
ACCELERATION LANE
fOIl IIGNT TURNS
CUIl1 IADIUS (It
fOIl IIGNr rUINS
IIGNr TURN
ANGLE
PERCENT
GlADE
E
A
IN
II
654
15
nl
15
T21
139
T21
al
69
STREET
LEIT
IIGNT
snEET
MAJOlI
ClJlPOS IT ION
VEIICLE
14a
45a
PEAIC ItOJI
fINAL
CRITICAL GAP
5.50
5.50
7.00
Ill,
PH PEAIC ItOJI
11-
III
20
20
20
45a
IIINCIIISTER Ill,
NICOLAS 10.
09-10-199 : ""
toNO IT lOllS
SIGIT olST,
ADJUSTMENT
0.00
0.00
0.00
NfOllMATlON
IWlE Of TME EAST/llEST snEET III NCHESTER
lAME Of THE _rN/SOHH STIEET NICOLAS 10.
DATE AND TIllE Of THE ANALYSIS, 09.10.T99
OTHER IlfOllMATlON. EXISTING COIIOITIONS
90
90
90
0.00
0.00
0.00
45a
EAST/llEST STIEET
THE IlOITN/SOUlI STIEET
AIIO TIllE Of THE AllALYSIS,
IlfOllllATlON. EXISTlIG
ADJUSTED
VALUE
5.50
5.50
T.OO
fJlHG
IDENT
33
T915 NCN, \JIlSICOIlALIlED INTERSECTIONS
....... ....... .......................
IDENTIfYING INfOllMATlON
..................................................
AVEIlAGE IUIIHING SPEED, MAJOII STREET.. 3D
PEAIC IlOUIl IICTOII........,..,.....,... 1
AlEA POPULATION....,........,..,..,.. 15??oo
HAIlE 01 TIlE EAST/llEST SnEET..,.,.... IIINCHESTER Ro,
IlAIIE 01 Till IlOITII/SOUTN SnEET..,.... NICOLAS 10.
_ 01 TIlE ANALyST............,..... A.P.
DATE 01 Till ANALYSIS (Mlddlyy)...... 09.10.199
TIllE PERIOD ANALYZED........,....,.., PI PEAC ItOJI
OTIIER INfOllllATlON.... EXISTING toIlOlTlONS
IHTERSECTlON TYPE AIIO tOIInOL
............................................................. '.,
INTElSECTlON TYPE' T.INrERSECTlOII
MAJOll snEET DIRECTlONI IlOITH/SOUTH
tOIIJROL TYPE IIEST_, STOP $I COIl
JRAIf I C VIlll"'S
.............................- '.... ..... -,
II III NI $I
..-..- ....... ... ..,
LEIT .. T5 220 100
r IlRU .- 211 621 41a
RIGIIT .. 61 12a 52
IIlNER 01 LAlIES
...... ,. .. .. ..
II III NI $I
. , ,
LAlIES 2 2 0
EAST_
IIEST_
_T..-
SOUTIIIQJIjO
10
IDENTlITING INIOllIIATlON
DATE
OTNER
IlAIIE 01 T ME
_01
$I LEIT
x IIOrOllCYCLES
o
o
X COllI I'" TI 011
VEHICLES
o
o
o
su rlUCKs
AIIO IV'S
o
o
o
x
CRIT I CAL GAPS
EAST_
IIEST_
_TH_
SOUTH_
VALUES
10.2
5.50
5.50
T.OO
T AlUl.AI
IT alii e
RIGNTS
III
III
$I
LEfTS
LEITS
"1-
MAJOR
"I NOlI
35
PIgI'l
AND LEVEL-Of-SERVICE
CAPACITY
P.ge~2
ADJUSTMENT fACTOIlS
'ele-
IONS
NIERSEC
UIIS1 IiIIALI ZED
1935 HOI.
RESERVE
CAl'AC ITY
C . C
R SN
SHARED
CAPACI IT
(pcP/!)
ACTUAL
MOVEIlENT
CAPACITY
C (pcp/>)
II
POTEN'
TlAL
CAl'ACI IT
(pcp/>)
P
fLOlI'
RAIE
v(pcp/>)
ACCELERAIION LANE
fOIl UGNl IUtlNS
CUltI IADIUS (#1)
fOIl IIGNI TUIlNS
20
20
liGHT lUIlN
ANGLE
90
90
PERCENT
GlADE
0.00
0,00
EAST_
WEST_
NOIlTNIOUIID
lD
SlIEET
NfOllMAIION
MAJOIl
IDENlIfllNG
AVEIlAGE IUIINING SPEED,
LOS
v
C
SN
MOVEMENT
fACTOIl
IlllUlI
PEAl
SlREET
MlNOIl
N
20
90
SOUT IIIllJIIO 0 . 00
VEN I CLE CllIlPOSI
15??oo
PALA 10.
POPULAIION,
EASTJWEST STREET
Of TIlE
AREA
IWlE
C
A
275
95l
ll7
942
l17
962
340
962
62
9
II LEfT
UGHI
TIlE _IN/SOUTH STIUT
Of
NAME
STREET
MAJOIl
ION
IAINICl/ CANTON 10
A.P.
TIlE ANALUT
Of
IWlE
A
al5
827
827
827
12
NI LEfT
I MOTORCYCLES
COllI I NATION
VENICLES
I
I SU TRUCKS
AND IV'S
o
o
o
10.
PEAl( HOUI
fTlNG INfOllMATlON
PALA 10.
IAINICl/ CAIIYON
09- 10. 199 ; All
EXISTING CONDITIONS
IDENT
IIAME Of TME EASTJWEST STlEET
NAIIE Of TME NOITM/SOUTH STlEET
DATE AIID TIME Of TME ANALYSIS.
OTHER INfORMATION.
o
o
o
EAST_
WEST_
NOIINIOUIlO
SOUT MIOUIlO
09-10- 199
C""cldlyy)
ANAL UII
DATE 0' THE
HWI
PEAl(
All
PEUIIl AIIALYZED.
liME
EXISIING CClIlDITIONS
"PE AIlO CONTlOI.
INfORMATION
llTEllECIION
OfllEl
o
o
o
"PE. I' INTERSECTION
INIERSECIION
GAPS
CIITlCAL
NORIN/SOU,.
SIIEET DIRECIION.
1lA_
fiNAL
CIITICAL
SIGHT DIST
ADMlllENT
ADJUSTED
VALUE
VALUES
10-2)
T AIULAR
(lebl.
STOP SIGN
"PE EAST_.
CllIITlOI.
GAP
RIGHTS
111_
VOLLIlES
lllA,f/C
5.50
0.00
5,50
5.50
EI
NI
WI
II
LEns
MAJOR
II
5.50
0.00
5.50
.50
NI
4
"
56
LEfT
7.00
0.00
7.00
7.00
II
LEfTS
MINOR
205
412
o
llIIIU
PALA 10,
IAI NIOlI CAlIYON 10,
09. 10- 199 ; All PEAK
COND III ONS
tNfORMAIION
IHE EASTJWEST SIREET
THE NOlIN/SOUTH STIEET
THE
IDENlInlNG
NAME Of
IWlE Of
5a
41
a
Of LANES
RIGNT
-.n
HOUI
ANALYSIS.
EXIITlNG
DATE AND TIME Of
OTHER INfORMAIION
SI
II
2
WI
EI
2
LANES
S€
[..a_4
3JI^US-~0-U^3l OHY UIJYdYJ
Z-oSOd
SIIOIJY~
H3WIsnrOY
-,eed
5110
JnUIH'
OUllYH,ISNIl 'NJN
S861
NS
A... ".:1
UIJYdYJ
iMUsn
(Ifd:>d )
U
I JYdYJ
OnYNS
lH3II3^<l11
lYlUJY
(Ifd>d) ,
UIJYclYJ
d
(Ifd>d) . (Ifd>d)"
AIIJYdYJ un
lY II -/lOll
HUDd
SH"m IN"I 1lO~
3HYl IIOIIYUU'JY
SH1IIll l1r.111 IIO~
U $OIOYI II",
il'HY
NIff11 IN""
iOY"'
lHlJlld
110 IIYlI1IOIH'
'HIHIINlOI
SOl
lH3IIl^0Il
H
OZ
06
00.0
OInJI15Yl
O(
lnus
IlOrYW
'OBdS 'HINNIl" "'YliMY
NS
II
OInJI1UII
1lO1JY~
IlOOIIIIUd
Y
o
SZV
(111
S9I
'I[
S9I
'I[
S9I
Z[
0'
([I
lnus
IN''1
Ull Ii
IIONIII
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
ISOdNOJ l1J1NiM
00'0 _Nlnos
_Nl_
OOOOS I
01 YlYd
lUI15
'110 II Y1ncIOd
15l11115U )Nl ~O
UIIY
JllYN
n)US
IlOryw
1101
'01 IIOAHYJ /lOlHln
"d.Y
lnus Nlnos/Nl_
1$1 lY11Y INI
lNl ~O
.0
lIlYN
-
Y
l"
[99
(99
(99
II
un IN
U1JAJIlO101l X
nlJ1NiM
110 llYN I 11IO' X
S.^I OIlY
SlIJIlU lIS
x
661
-01'60
(<IA/pp",)
$I $1 lY11Y
iNl
010
UYO
o
o
o
_ISY)
IlOOII :I'Iid
lid
'OiU1Y11Y GOIIU 31111
SIlO II
lOON IIYld lid : 661-01-60
01 IIOANYJ /lOIN In
. 01 Y1Y4
110 II YWIlO. N
OIlOJ 'NI15IX)
'SISAlYIlY )Nl .0
lnus NlI1OS/N1_ iNl .0
nn15 ISJIII1Sn iNl ~O
'NIHIlNiOI
illYN
illYN
o
o
o
o
o
o
OInJllSJII
_Nlnos
_Hl_
SIIOIII~
'NIISII)
1OI111lQ OIlY UAl
,.,IIYWIlOU.
.,lunIU..
IIN10
"IIYWIIO~NI UN10
31111 ONY UYO
"1I'"IUNI'1
'UAl IIOII')$IUNI
SdW lYJIUIJ
NlI1OS/N1_ '1IOIIJ3I'O lUllS
IlOfYW
dY9
lYJ11I1J
lYNU
lN3IIlSnroy
1S10 IN''S
lfllY^
OUSIll'OW
Z-Ol elQell
UnlY^ IY1IIIYl
N"S
d01S
'_ISY) UU 10UIIXI
OS.S
00.0
OS.S
OS.S
UN"I
Ii
IlONIII
S Ml1Ol\
JlHYlI
Slnl
IIOrYll
IS
IN
..
Ii
OS.S
00.0
OS.
OS'S
IN
o
[I
ZI
un
OO'l
00'0
oo'l
oo'l
Ii
sun
IlONIII
69S:
I9Z
o
11I1I1
IInd
01
IIOIIYIlIlO~NI
SIIOIIIOllOJ 'NIISlXi . IIOIIYWIlOIN 1 UN10
lid ! 661-01-60 'SlU1YNY iNl ~O 31111 ONY UYO
IIOAm /lOIN In nnlS Nlnos/Nl_ iNl '0 illYN
"01 Y1Yd lUllS lSJII/lSU iNl 010 illYN
'NlHIlNiD.
zv
.,
9S:
l1r.111
IlOOII
UNW' Jo)
UtInl
IS
IN
Z
..
n
Z
UllYl
It
[.'SOd
J"^US-JO-UAll ON' UIJ'dYJ
Z-'SOd
SIIOIJ'J
!N3MUnroy
-.Sld
SIlO
JJSnlNI
OUl1ftr.lISN/1 :IOM SV61
,
UIJ'dYJ
J^IJnl
clld>d)
AUJYdY:l
OJIYMS
II
lld>d)
AlIJ'''''
JII3MJllOII
lmlJ'
lfU
-IIJIOd
d
(lldxl) ,
UIJYdYJ
( lld>d)A
U"
-/lOll
SNlIt11 IM~II IIOJ
JNfl llOu,nUJJ'
SNII11 JM~II 1101
) sm OYI lilt)
Jl~N'
111111 JM" I
JOY.,
ll1JJnd
IlOUYllIIOJN
~NIl
"l01
sal
A
JII3MJIIOII
II
II
II
OZ
06
00-0
_Ml_
_1511l
_lSYJ
at
nn15
IIOrYII
. ondS ~N 1 NNnl
r.lnJII'
MS
MS
OZ
06
00'0
1I01J'J
If'OlI
IWJd
"506
, ,e 'L'
, L5t
906
9H 906
.1St
906
'L'
LS[
906
IZS
Sit
1
o
o
IM~II
M~1II1
un IN
nJUS IIONIII
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
ISOdIIO:l J1JIIIJII
00'0 _Mll1lS
'01 "" lidS 1011
OOOOSl
,nll_
lUUI
'110 U '1IldOd
15311115'J JMl 10
YJIY
Mil
506
, ,e
, ,
I
UL
U'
zos
'51
SL,
[Z,
'51
SL'
[2'
'51
IZS
["
ZI
un15
JM"I
M!lI'OlMl
un IS
IIONIII
nlJAJlOlOII "
UlJIMJ^
110 U YII IIlClJ "
1101
S.^I 011'
IJJI1ll1 ns "
SdllYl IS SIZ-
'd"
661-01-60
lUlU UIIlS/U_
(M"",,...)
SIU1'1lY JIll
15n,", JMl 10
JMI 10
10
_"
JIIYIl
UYO
[So!
9[1
..
Z
o
o
o
0IlI101! S'J
If'OlI
)IJd
NY
'OJU1Y1lY aollJd 3MU
lUUS
IIOrYII
o
o
o
o
o
o
_UIOII
_1511l
SIlO 1
I CIIlOJ
~NI15IXJ
1I011Y1111011I1
IJll10
I
,
551
156
LlI6
156
LlI6
156
LlI6
156
zo
a
UJl
un
M
IJ
lOUIIOJ 011' IdU
IIOIIJISIIIIII
o
o
o
CIIlIlOIMJIIlS
~il-' 'JdU
IIOI1JJ$lUM
II10M
SIlO 111 ONO:l
NY : 661-01-60
SdllYl IS SIZ-t
01 "MlldS 1011 ynll_
)YJd
IIOI1Y111OJIII 'NIUUIIJOI
~1I115IXJ IIOI1Y111OIIII IIMIO
'SISA1IIlY Jill 10 3MU OIlY U'O
nn15 IIlI1lS/Ml_ JIIJ 10 Mil
nJUI UJ/l/15YJ IIIJ 10 MN
dY!I
lYJUllJ
lYNI
1113Mll/ll'av
1510 IM"S
Jf'I1Y^
ousnrav
Z-Ol
SJf'llY^
.I~I
IYlll1Yl
Sd"
IS
IN
SUr-III
lYJl1l1J
101I111
15J/1/ISYJ
tr.IlS
tr.IlI
dOLI
d01S
'IIOUJIIIO
'01111011I 111011 idA!
idA!
, CINI1OIMI/lO$
UlIII
lOUIlOJ
lOUIlllJ
IOrYII
05'5
05'5
00'0
00-0
05'5
05'5
05'5
05'5
lUll
UlIOlO.\
" ll'U
00'5
00'5
00'0
00'0
00'5
00'5
00'5
00'
M
Ii
IOrYII
IS
IN
SII~nollll
11011111
IS
01
III
o
M
OZI
Ii
un
00"
00"
00'0
00'0
00"
00"
00"
00"
Z
o
'[2
'"
I1lIlIl
lun
_III
'L
o
111"1
OS"
OS"
00'0
00'0
OS.,
OS"
OS"
OS"
IS
IN
r.lYSn
IN'1 aliI UIIYl 10
IIIIIlII
'01
IRlII IWJd
SNOI1IOllOJ ~N
NY : 661-01-60
SdllYl IS SlZ-1
""lIdS 1011 ,nll_
1I011Y11IOJIII ~MIUUNIOI
SIXJ NOUYIIIlllJIIJ UMIO
SISAlYIIY Jill 10 3MU OIlY JiYO
UlI15 1I1/lO$/1I11lO11 Jill 10
nn15 15311115YJ IMl
Mil
JO MM
IS
III
M
IJ
$JI.n
37
Po,e- 3
LEVEl-OF-SERVICE
CAPACITT AND
Pe,e-2
ADJUSTMENT FACTOIlS
Pe,e-
NTERSECTlOIIS
19a5 NCM: UIISIGNALlZED
RI GNT TURN
ANGLE
PERCENT
GltADE
LOS
v
RESERVE
CAPACI TY
. c
R
SHARED
CAPACITY
(pcph)
c
ACTUAL
I40VfMEN
CAPACI TY
c (pcph
II
POTEN-
FLOW- TlAL
RATE CAPACITY
v(pcph) c (pcph)
p
I40VfIlENT
ACCElERATlOII LANE
FOIl RlGNT TUllNS
CURl IADIUS (f
FOIl II GilT TURNS
20
20
90
90
0.00
0.00
EAST IOUNO
WESTIOUIIO
30
STREET
NFOIlKATlOII
IlAJOIl
RUNNING SPEED,
IDENTIFYING
AVERAGE
SII
SII
N
FACTOIl
'EAIt IKlUR
142. D
192 'A 0
601. A
142
192
609
142
192
609
206
265
609
o
o
I
STREET
LEFT
TNROUGII
RIGIIT
III NOll
NI
N
20
20
90
90
0.00
0.00
IIOITNIlIJIID
smlTlllCUNO
10.
IIOT SPRINGS
15??oo
_RIETA
STREET
POPUUTI 011.
TilE EASl/WEST
AREA
liME 01
601
609
160
la9
114
160
119
a14
221
261
114
In
o
70
SlREET
SI LEFT
TIIROUGII
RIGIIT
"1110I
X IIOTOIlCTCLES
X COIlIIHA TI 011
VEIIICLES
COIlPOS IT I 011
SU TRUaS
AIIO RV'S
x
VENICLE
-215 $I R_S
A,P.
09'10-199
_TN/smlYII SlIEET
(_cIdIyy)
ANALYST
ANALYSIS
TNE
OF TilE
IIIE
IlAIIE 01
DATE OF
IlAIIE
D
A
la9
744
o
o
o
EASTICUNO
IIOUR
PII PEAr
'ERIOD AHAL
TIllE
STREET
IlAJOIl
o
o
o
WESlIOUIID
EXISTING COllDITIOIIS
NFOIlNATlOII
OTNER
A
A
913
446
913
611
913
611
913
611
o
235
LEFT
LEFT
EI
WI
o
o
o
o
o
o
IIOITlllCUNO
smlTN_
TTPE AIID COIITROl.
INTERSECTlOII
4-LEG
TYPE
NTERSECTlOII
10
IlCU1
IDENTlFYIIIG INFOIlNATlOII
NAIIE 01 TIlE EASl/WESI STREET _IIElA 1I0T SPIIIIGS
IIAIIE OF TilE 1I000TII/smllll STREET 1-215 SI RAllI'S
DATE AND TIllE OF TilE AIIALYSIS, 09-10-199 ; PII pur
OTIIER IIIFOIlNATlOII EXISTIIIG COIIDIYIOIIS
GAP
FIliAL
CIIT ICAL
SIGIIT DIST
ADJUSTMENT
ADJUSTED
VALUE
TAlULAR VALUES
(hble 10-2
GAPS
IIGIITS
CIIIYICAL
"11I0Il
EAST /WEST
SIGII
SIGII
STOP
STOP
DIIECTlOII:
1I000T 1l1CUNO:
smlT1l1OUIIO :
STIEEl
TYPE
TYPE
COIITIOl.
COIITlOl.
NAJOI
5.50
5.50
0.00
0.00
5.50
5.50
5,50
5.50
III
SI
VOl._ S
TRAFF IC
5.00
5.00
LEFTS
IlAJOI
5.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
5,00
u
WI
$I
III
WI
EI
THlOUGIIS
III
SI
"1110I
156
o
214
o
LEF
6.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
o
o
276
512
THIU
LEFTS
"1110I
64
o
26
IIGNT
6.50
6.50
0.00
0.00
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
III
SI
LANE USAGE
AIID
IILIIIEI OF LANES
IlCU1l
_IIETA NOT SPRlIIGS 10.
1.2T5 SI RAllPS
09'10-199 ; PM PEAIt
IIIG COIIDITIOIIS
FYIIIG IIIFOIlllATlOII
TilE EAsr IWEST STREET
TIlE IIOITN/SOUTII STlEET
AND TIllE OF TilE AIIALYSIS.
I IIFOIlNATI 011 [XIS
OF
OF
IDENT
DATE
OTNER
IWIE
IIAIIE
SI
III
WI
EI
LANES
8&
{-ae'd
lJI^I3S-~O-llMl
ON. UIJ.dYJ
Z-.e'd
SIOIJ'~
1N1MISnrav
-.Sed
SIIOI
JUIUOI
on
1_l5on
:10. St61
. . .
UIJ'd'J
iAnsu
IllClod) .
urJ'dY]
onYlls
lICIod)
UIJ.dYJ
1011111\01O
1'1l! JY
1'1
OUDd
IllClod)A
un
.1llI1I
S.11l! IN'II IO~
10.1 lIOu.UllJJ.
SOlllll IN"I IO~
lJ) SOIavl IlIIIJ
11'"
.1111 IN" I
lav'"
10lJ13d
NOIIYNIOIOI
'NIUII010'
SOl
A
d
IllClodl .
AlIJWdYJ
IlllMJAOII
.
.
OZ
06
00"0
_NllIOII
_ISM
_U'I
O{
IUln
IIOrYN
'OUdS '0'0_ r.J'UA'
NS
HS
II
OZ
06
00'0
IOIJ.I
IfIllN JYJd
. .
I Y.
J .
m
SU
OlZ
{06
S{{
7VZ
.
.
.
{06
SU
tIIZ
{06
It{
sa
t9
o
{l
uun
IN'II
N!lIlOINI
un I.
lIOIIllI
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
IIOU 'SOdIIOJ nJlNlA
.0 _MIIlllS
00
'01
". lidS lOll
oooou
.U.I_
IUln
110 11Y1/IdOd
uwun lMI ~O
nlY
--
SIS
199
U1IIS
lIOIIllI
SdllYl 1M UZ-
'd"
UUIS MlnoS/.IIION 1M
UAlYIIY
IMI
~O
10 )llYN
)llYN
Sill
Ol{
6ZZ
SIll
ZZ{
OSZ
I
o
o
nlJAJlIOlOII x
nlJIHlA
11011 '.IINOJ
x
SI^I OIlY
SJJI1I1 ns
x
.
I
J
till
Ol{
6ZZ
Sill
Ol{
6ZZ
IM"I
M!lf1OIMI
Inl
IS
661-01-60
(M"","')
SlUl.M. lMI
10
IlYo
o
o
o
o
o
o
_UM
CIIlI1OIU.1
1110II WId
IIY
olU 1'N.
aollld
IIIU
UUU
IIOrYN
SIIOII
I 0IlIlJ
'NilS III
. IIOIIYllIOIN I
111I10
lt6
(liS
116
ZZ9
1116
Zl9
o
0'
Inl
un
III
tl
a
o
o
ONnoIM I lION
.
Y
116
ZZ9
1OIIIIOJ ON' IdA!
IIOUJUUI.I
o
o
o
_MIIlllS
,n.,
ldAI
110 I1JlSnl.
SIlO I
1110H 1I.1d II. : 661'01-60
SdllYl .. SIZ-I
01 ".'ldS lOll YUII_
IIOIIYNIIO~.I '.IUllnor
'.IISIU
'SIU'YN. IMI ~O 1M1I
1I1llS .11lllS/Nl_ IH1
lUllS UM/Isn 1II1
IIOIIYIIlIO~.1 111I10
CIIY llYO
10 IIIYN
~O lllYll
m
lYJ1I11]
,..u
l.lMIsnrav
UIO IM"S
i1111.^
ousnrav
Z-Ol el...1I
Sillll.^ 1Y1I1IYI
sm
SlN"1
lYJII II]
lIOIIlN
ISM/U.l
"'IS
"'IS
dOlS
dOlS
IIOIIJUIO
OIlllOlNllION ldA!
Idll
OIIIlOIM 11'05
lUllS
1OlIllOJ
1OlIllOJ
IlOI'Yll
OIlOJ
OS'S
OS.S
00'0
00'0
OS'S
OS.S
OS.
OS'S
.S
..
unl
IIOrYN
SlN010A
JIH.II
OO'S
OO'S
00'0
00'0
OO'S
OO'S
OO'S
OO.S
III
tl
IS
I.
III
tl
IS
IN
SN!lIlOI.1
lIOIIlN
o
ZI
o
9{
nl
OS'9
00'9
00'0
00.0
OS.9
00.9
OS'9
00'9
o
o
16'
III
nlMI
sun
_III
Z9
'1
o
N'II
OO'l
OS'9
00'0
00.0
OO-l
OS.9
OO'l
OS.9
IS
I.
l,vsn 1..1
CII. n..l 10 nl_
01
II10M
SIlO
J.ld IIY : 661-01-60
SdWYI IN SIZ.I
"NlldS 10M YUII_
IIOIIYNIO~NI
10llOJ ,NIISIIl IIOIIYNIOINI I3MIO
'S lSA lVN. lMI ~O 11111 011. IlYo
UUIS NlnoS/NlIION lNI ~O )llYN
UUIS 1S1/I/1501 lMI ~O IIIYN
'NIUIINIOI
IS
I.
III
Z
11
UNYl
at
( ->8od
3JI^13S-jO-13^31
011' AlIJYdYJ
l->e.d
SlIOlJYl
1N3IUSnt'OY
.aaed
SIIOIIJU13IM
au Il'M" s"n
IIOllYWlIOlM
'Mil
'ION 5861
M]OI
MS
~ .
AlI JYdYJ
L\nsn
MS
Ifllodl
AI lJ'dYJ
on",s
N
(Ifllodl
AlIJY,"J
IM3NL\ON
1'OJJY
d
(Ifllodl ~
AlIJ',"J
"11
-MnOd
(lfllodlA
31Y1
-/IlIlj
SMlIfll IN,.. 1101
3..1 1IOII'13UJJY
SMlIfll IN'II leU
I SOl OYI IIlI1J
31'M'
MlIfll IN"I
3OY"
IM3J.3d
SOl
A
IM:III3IIOII
Ol
06
00.0
Ollf1OlIsn
O(
lUllS
IOrw
OUdS 'M I .Mn.
3"n^'
Ol
06
00.0
OInlINIlIOIl
_lUll
IOIJU
II1ltl lIV3d
Ol
06
00.0
oooou
11011 'lIldOd
n..
O<~(l
a 3< II
3 < zt
0(5
II
16
0(5
III
16
0(5
sn
01
96(
o
6
unlS
M"I
M!lIllIINI
Inl 1M
lIOIllM
Ol
06
00.0
OllIIIINIIlllS
'01 "MlldS 10M
'1311_
nnn
IUII/lSn JNI
lO :IIlYM
SL
0"
n311S MIIlllS/MlIOM 3MI 10
:IIlYM
,
a
3
(ll
601
Ol
~Zl
601
Ol
~u
601
Ol
'll
In
SL
I
o
o
unlS
1M" I
M!lIllIIMI
1131 IS
lIOfIlN
nlJAJlOlON x
nlJIN3^
110 11'" 1I1lOJ X
110111 SOdNOO
S.^I 011'
UJOII lIS X
31J I N3^
SdMYI 1M Sll.
'd"
661-01-60
(AAIPP/WI
lSAl'.' JNI 10
SIU1'IIY
3MI
:IIlYM
jO n,o
o
o
o
_Isn
If1JIl
)nd
Il4
'OUAl'1IY ool13d
JIlII
lUllS
IOrYll
o
o
o
OllflOIIUII
SIlO 111 CIIlOJ
'MIISIXJ
. 110 IIYWIOIN I
IIOIIJHnlMI
nMIO
,
,
S09
lO'
509
5(5
509
5(5
509
5(5
o
III
Inl
1131
11\
n
o
o
o
o
o
a
CIIIRlIM IIlllS
CIIIRlIM IlIOfI
101IIIOJ
OIlY
3dAl
'31-' tJdA!
IIOIIJHnlMI
11011 YIlllOjM I
'MluunOI
IM3NISIV'OY
ISlO IN"S
3I'Il'^
onsnroy
(l.OI
S3f1,,^
'lqeU
"1111'1
Sd" lYJI
IIJ
lSWlS'J
"'IS
dOlS
'lIOuntlo U311S
Ollf1OIIIllIOfI
JdA!
IOrYll
10111lllJ
SIlO 111 OIlOJ ,M U SI XJ
III10N lIV3d Md : 661-01-60 "SIU1'"' 3MI
SdllYl I" Sll-1 lUllS "II'OSlMllO" 3MI lO :lIlY"
01 "MlldS 1011 '1311_ unlS 1S3II/lSn 3111 lO JIIYIl
IIOIIYIlllOjMI
jO 31IU
I3Ml0
OIlY U'O
d" l'JI
l'MU
"J
51M,,,
110M 1M
"'IS dOlS
'_Minos
3dAl
10111lllJ
05'5
05'5
00'0
00'0
05'5
05'5
05'5
05'5
IS
I.
JlHYlI
sun
IOrYll
S:IIln1OA
00'5
00'5
00'0
00'0
00'5
00'5
00'5
00
11\
n
IS
o
1M
I
11\
o
13
91
un
05'9
00"9
00'0
00'0
05'9
00"9
05'9
00'9
IS
I.
SM!lIllIlMl
lIOIlIN
o
o
l6'
1(9
n..l
11
10" IN
09(
'Sl
o
1M"1
OO'l
05'9
00'0
00'0
OO'l
05'9
OO'l
05'9
IS
8"
J!lysn 311Yl
CIIl'I
nllYl
jO 13.-
110 U YIlIeUM
'"Ill
nOI
n
SIIOIIIOIlOJ 'MIISIX3
If10II lIV3d Md : 661.01-60 S1S! l'M' 3MI
S_I 1M Sll-1
'01 "MlldS 1011 '1311_
lUllS NlnoS/NIIIO" 3NI jO 3NY"
lUllS lS3II/ISn 31ll lO :IIlYM
1101
10
'MlIOlM
3MII OM'
nNl0
31Y0
IS
l
1M
11\
SJllYl
6t
..el'd
3JI^I3S-JO-llM' Ony
11 I JYdYJ
Z.oieltd
SIOIJYJ
Ollllsnroy
................................. ....................................
I-OeOd SnoIlJlSIlIO' Ollnyo"Son :1/:10 ~V61
l'~OY
01lO1 10~11
3OY.,
.nUd
nollYWI010
~.11
OlO'
os
, .
111JYdYJ
3^USlI
JYdYJ
03lYMS
101ll3^CM
lYOI JY
lYI
OHOd
('lcbd)A
3nl
-mll
snllOl 1M" I 101
lOYl nollYIlHJJY
SNIlOI 1M" I IOJ
) SnlOYI IlIf1J
qd:><l)
At
II
qd:><l) ,
11 JYdYJ
d
"":><I)
111JYdn
INlIIli\OW
OZ
06
00'0
OllOOllSYl
Of
lUllS
IOrYII
ondS
~Nloonl
l'Wll^Y
so,
"S
OZ
06
00'0
0Mn011S3rl
IOIJYJ
aroM ~Yld
Y .
J J'
a .
6Z6
IfZ
691
fi6
I{Z
III
9{6
IU
IVI
9U
l'Z
l61
l
o
ZI
133115
1"~11
",rol"1
In, IN
ION III
OZ
OZ
06
06
00'0
00'0
ONflOl"I_
ClMIlOI" 111IS
'01 S'NI_
10M
oooou
Y 1311_
UIlS
nol
lS3rl/15Yl 3"1 10
Yll\dOd Yln
JllYN
,{Z
UZ
3"1
10
JllYN
Y .
J y.
o <<
69l
Z{Z
WI
.
.
.
56L
Z{Z
61
.
.
.
561
ZU
161
56l
atZ
50l
5Z
o
,
1331lS
IM'II
M!lI1OIMI
un
ION III
IS
nlJ1JIOI011 II
nlJI"3o\
NOIlYNIINOJ II
NOlllSOdllOJ
SoAI aNY
S~JI1Il os II
l'JIM3o\
3o\Y
661-01'60
NOS~Jyr
'd'y
1331IS Hlnos/MI_
(M/PP,"",)
SllYNY
SIU'YIlY i"1
lM
10
j()
JllYO
UYO
'5
o
o
o
OMnOIlSYl
IIlJtl
~Yld
NY
'03ZA 'YIIY lIOlUd
JIlIl
lUllS
IOrYW
a
o
o
OIlllOIIS3rl
SNOI
lIIIO:J
9NIlSII1
. IMlllYll101M I
UHlO
Y
Y
zu
SOS
au
Z'/S
au
Z95
au
Z9S
l
9{
n
In,
11\
n
o
o
a
ClMIlOI"I_
1OIlNOJ ONY idl1
IMlIIJJSUIMI
o
o
ONflOl" 111IS
9n-,
idAl
NOIIJlSUIMI
SdY!l
lYJI
IIJ
01 "MlldS
11I"O"
)Yid
NY
SNOI
661-01-60
3o\Y NOS~JYr
10" Y13lnl1M
IMlIlYllIOJMI 'NIHIlMiOI
'NIlSlKi NOIIYllI01NI IlMIO
'SlSllYNY 3"1 JO JIlIl aNY ino
133115 Mlnos/"IION i"1 10 JllYN
133115 lS3II/lSY3 3Ml 10 JllYN
dY~ lYJ II
lYNIl
IJ
NiMlSnroy
ISla 1"'IS
3/1,Y^
ousnroy
Z-ol olqel
nl11Y^ Iy'nlY I
SI",II
ION 1M
lS3rl/ISY3
119IS
N~1S
dillS
dillS
NOIlJ3110 133115
:_MlllOS 3dAl
: lIMI1lIIHlION 3dAl
1OI'Y11
1OIlNOJ
1OIlNOJ
oneJ
05'5
OS'
00'0
00'0
05'5
OS'S
OS'S
OS
IS
IN
SU3'
IOryw
SJwn,O^ J
WlI
OS
O~
00'0
00'0
OS'S
05'5
05'5
05'5
....
n
'S
IN
11
11\
9
n
IS
U3'
05'9
05'9
00'0
00'0
05'9
05'9
05-9
05'9
IS
8"
SN!lI1OINI
ION III
o
tiS
lO{
nlNI
SU3,
IIOIlIM
{Z
9
n
9
N'II
oo'l
oo'l
00'0
00'0
oo'l
oO'l
oo'l
Oo'l
IS
8N
3~ysn 3NY'
ONY nNY'
o Il8wnn
01 S'N lidS
IIOON
~Y3d
NY
SNO
661-01'60
. JAY NOS~Jyr
10M Y13I1_
/IOIlYWI01N
oNOJ 'NIlSIK3 NOIlYllI01N
"SISllYNY 3NI 10 JIll
'IUIIS MlroS/"IION
13311S 1S3II/lSY3
'MUJ
iNI
3"1
oNY
JO
JO
NiDI
U"lo
3 YO
JllYN
JIlYIl
1$
IN
11\
Z
n
Z
nnYl
6E
r -'SOd
3JI^US
lO-UA31 ONY
AI IJYdO
Z-'SOd
SlIOlJU IN3"lsnroy
.e_d
SIIOI1J3SUIN
03lJ1Y""SNn :IlJM
5V6I
SNIIIII JN~II 1101
II Sn! OYI 11m
NS
, .
JIIJYdYJ
3AUSU
JYdYJ
OUYNS
JN3II3AON
lYniJY
lYI
-N310d
ljCl:>d)A
3nl
-/lOll
SNIIIII IN"I 1101
3"01 IIOIIYUUJJY
31~NY
Nlni IN"I
3OYI~
N3J13d
NOIIYlfllOln
~n
"JOI
SOl
A
(ljCl:>d)
U
"
(ljCl:>d) ,
UIJYdYJ
d
ljCl:>d) ,
AI I JYdYJ
JN3113AOl1
OZ
06
00"0
ONOOIlSU
or
UUIS
lIOrYlf
'OUdS ~nlNNnl
nnAY
NS
OZ
06
00'0
ONOOIlS311
'1OIJYl
lrow
HUd
<
3<
<
V69
6l
9'
OOL
6l
15
OOl
6l
15
OOl
rOI
5L
Z
o
,
n3US
JM~II
N~noINJ
H31 IN
ION III
OZ
OZ
06
06
00"0
00"0
ONOOSMIIOII
ONl1llMlnos
-01 S~NIIdS JON
000051
YUln,...
nuu
. 110 II Y1I\dOd
U3IIIISY3 lNJ lO
un
)WYN
L9
u
Y
n3US
llOIllll
S31JJJlIOIOlI I
S31J1N3I\
IIOIJYNIIllOJ I
IIOIIISOdNOJ 31J1N3I\
S,AI ONY
SHJIIU ns I
lAY
NOSJJyr
'd'Y
UUU NIOOS/NJllOIl
1S11Y11Y lNI 10
SISl1YNY lNJ lO lno
3NI
lO )WYN
)WYN
Y < Z59
30<08
<L7
16l
08
~
16l
08
'19
6L
~I
"
6n
o
VI
1""1
N!lIlOIMJ
U31
IS
661-01'60
(M/pp/Ul)
Z61
v,r
o
o
o
o
o
o
OIlI1OIlS311
CIIIIlOIUYl
IIlOII
HUd
lid
03ZA lYNY II) IIJd
JIlIJ
JUUS
IOryw
SIIOIIIOIlOJ
~NIUIx)
. IIOIJYIIIOIN 1 nNJO
VI'
16r
5Z,
955
5Z'
955
5Z7
955
L
591
H31
H31
11\
n
o
o
o
OIll1OINJ ION
lOUIIOJ ONY JdU IIOIIJISnlN
Y
o
o
o
ONIlOtN lnos
IIOIJJJSnlN
SdY!l 10
~31"
3dU
IJ
U 311I UYl
'1IOIJJ3IIO
JUIlS
IOI'YW
01 "N lidS
lnoN HY3d
lid
110 IJ YWlIOl N
SNOIIIONOJ ~NIJSIX3 IlOIJYWlIOlNI UNIO
661'01'60 'SISA1YNY 3NJ JO 3111J ONY JlYO
3I\Y IlOSJJyr JUUS Nlnos/NllION 3NJ 10 )WYN
JON YUIIW1l UUU U3II/U03 lNI JO JllYN
'N'UIJNlOI
dY!l
1.JIIIIJ
lYNIl
IN3IIISnroy
UIO IM~IS
JI11Y^
OJlsnrav
Z'OI
S3111YA
.1qe1l
n1l1lYI
SIN" I
lION I"
"'IS
"'IS
dOlS
dOU 'Olll1OlMlnos
OIlI1OIMlION ldU
ldJI
lOUIlOJ
10111lOJ
05'5
OS"
00'0
00"0
05'5
05"5
05'5
05'5
IS
IN
Slnl
IOrYW
53N111(M
JIHUI
05'5
05"5
00'0
00"0
05'5
05'5
05"5
OS'S
11\
n
IS
91
IN
III
9
n
051
Ull
05"9
05'9
00"0
00'0
05"9
05'9
05"9
05"9
IS
IN
SN!lIlOINI
lOtI I "
o
o
995
06l
IlINI
SIHl
llOlIl"
9Z1
z
l[
01
IN'"
oo'L
OO'l
00'0
00'0
OO'L
OO'L
OO'L
OO"L
IS
IN
~ysn lNYl
ONY
UN01 10
nlWlN
01 "N lidS
11/10II
HYld "d
SNOI
661'01,60
. 3I\Y IIOUJyr
JON 01311_
110 IJYWlIOlN I
OIlOJ ~N
'S 3NI
nulS MlOOS/NllION 3NI
lUlU U3II/ISYl 3NI
UIX)
SA lYNY
10
10
NOIIYWlIOlN
lO 3111 ONY
~",UIIN301
13MI0
UYO
)WYN
JllYN
IS
IN
III
n
53NYl
HeM Signalized Intersection
Operational Analysis Worksheets
1
1985 HCH: SICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMART REPORT
1985 HCH: SICNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
$Ul4MARY REPORT
..........................................................................
INTERSECTlON..IIINCHESTER RD.II-15 S8 RAMP
AREA TYPE... ..OTHER
ANALyST....., .A.P.
DATE......... .09-05-1991
TIME.......,.."" PEAK HClJtl
ClJlMENT. . . .. .. EX I STI NG COND IT J ONS
INTERSECTlON..IIINCHESTER RD.II-15 S8 R,,"P
AREA TYPE,.. ..OTHER
ANALyST....., .A.P.
DATE......... .09-05-1991
TI ME.. .. .. .. .. PM PEAK HOUR
COMMENT.......EXISTING CONDITIONS
VOLl.MES GEOMETRY VOlLMES GEOMETR!
E8 118 N8 S8 E8 118 N8 51 EI 118 N8 SI E8 118 N8 S8
LT 0 0 0 349 T 12.0 12_0 11.0 12.0 LT 0 0 0 489 T 12.0 12.0 11.0 L 12,0
TH 324 579 0 0 TR 12.0 12.0 11.0 14.0 TH 1151 542 0 0 TR 12.0 12.0 11,0 R 14.0
RT 88 0 0 6n 12.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 RT 191 0 0 508 : 12.0 13,0 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8,0 RR 0 0 0 175 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
........................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................--..................................................--
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSE S PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV AD J PKG 8USES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE
(X) (X) Y/N Nil Nb Y/N .in T (X) (X) Y/N Nil Nb Y/N .In T
E8 4.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 11.8 3 E8 4_00 2.00 N 0 0 0_90 0 Y 11.8 3
118 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 11.8 3 118 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 11.8 3
H8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3
S8 2.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3 SI 2_00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 Y 19.8 3
.......................-....--.................... ................... ........ ...................... ....................--................ ......................... ..........................................-........ .....................................-...............-. ........
SIGNAL SETYINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 70.0 SIGNAL SEll I NGS CYCLE LENGTH . 70.0
PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-I PH-2 PH.3 PH.4 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
E8 IT
TH
RT
PO
118 IT
TH
RT
PO
GREEN
YELUlII
X
26.0
4.0
0.0
0,0
N8 LT E8 IT N8 L T
TH TH X TH
RT RT X RT
PO PO X PO
58 L T X 118 LT S8 L T
TH TH X TH
RT X RT RT
PO PO X PO
GIlEEN 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GIlEEN 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN
YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW
X
X
X
X
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
26.0
4.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
LEVEL OF SERV I CE
LANE GRP. VIC G/C OELAY LOS APP. DELAT APP. LOS
E8 TR 0.369 0.386 10.0 8 10.0 I
118 T 0,491 0.386 10.7 8 10.7 I
S8 L 0.489 0,529 8,4 8 13.6 8
R 0.887 0,529 16.3 C
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GIlP. VIC GIC DELAT LOS APP. DELAT APP. LOS
E8 TR 0.867 0,529 12_2 8 12.2 8
118 T 0.336 0.529 6.1 8 6.1 8
S8 L 0.939 0,386 32,8 0 24.4 C
. 0.599 0.386 12,1 8
INTERSECTION:
OeI8Y. 12.0 (Iee/v"') V/C. 0.720
LOS . I
INTERSECTION:
DeI8Y. 14.5 (Iee/veh) v/C. 0.897
LOS . 8
2
1985 HtH: SIGNAlIZEO INTERSECTIONS
SlJ9IART REPORT
..........................................................................
INTERSECTlOII..IIINCHESTER RO./I.15 H8 IlAIIP
AREA TTPE... ..OTHER
ANALTST...... .A.P.
OATE......... .09-05-1991
T I ME. .. .. .. ...AM PEAK HCUR
CQlMENT...... ,EKISTlNG COIIOIT lOllS
VOl.lJIES
E8 118 N8
IT Z71 0 ZZZ
TH 615 6ZO 0
RT 0 Z76 Z13
RR 0 lZ5 100
S8
o
o
o
o
E8
lZ,O
lZ.0
\Z.O
8.0
lZ,O
lZ.0
GEOMETRT
118 N8
11.0 11.0 l
11.0 11,0 TR
13.0 lZ,O
8.0 8.0
lZ.0 11.0
lZ.0 lZ.0
S8
lZ.0
lZ.0
lZ.0
8.0
lZ.0
lZ.0
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHf PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TTPE
(1) (1) TIN Ha Nb TIN aln T
E8 0.00 Z.OO N 0 0 0.90 0 T 10.8 3
118 Z.OO Z.OO N 0 0 0.90 0 T 10.8 3
N8 Z.OO Z.OO H 0 0 0.90 0 T Z2,5 3
S8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T ZZ,S 3
.......4O _............4O....................4O................................................................................................................
SIGNAL SETTINGS
PH.l PH-Z PH-3 PH.4
E8 IT X N8 l T
TH X X TH
RT X RT
PO X PO
1/8 l T S8 IT
TH X TH
RT X RT
PO X PO
GREEN 16.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN
TEllOll 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 TEllOll
CTCLE lENGTH. 70.0
PH-I PH-Z PH-3 PH-4
X
X
Z6,O
4.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
lEVEL Of SERVICE
lANE GRP. V/C G/C OELAT lOS APP, OELAY APP. lOS
E8 l O.73Z O.ZO ZJ,I C 13,9 8
T o,ns 0.5Z9 9.8 8
1/8 T 0.870 0.Z43 ZZ.4 C 21,0 C
R 0.447 0.Z43 15.0 C
N8 L 0.440 0.386 12.5 8 11.4 8
R 0.ZZ4 0.386 9,4 8
I NTERSECTlOII:
Del.y' 16.3 (sec/veh) V/C. 0.641
LOS . C
3
1985 HCM: SICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUHKART REPORT
1985 HCM: SICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUlHAaT REPORT
.... .... ........ .... .............. ..... .... ... ........... ... .... ..........
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION. .WINCHESTER RD.IJEFFERSON AVE,
AREA TTPE..,..OTHER
ANALTST...... .RAD
DATE......... .09-15- 199
TIllE.. .. .. . .. ,AM PEAK HQJR
COHKENT. . , .. .. EX I ST I NG COND IT IONS
INTERSECTION. ,WINCHESTER Rll./JEFFERSON AVE.
AREA TTPE.... ,OTHEI
ANAL TST .. .. . .. UII
DATE..,.,..,. .09'15-199
TIllE........ ..P" PEAK HQJR
CCI9IENT...., ..EX I STING COND IT IONS
.. ..... ...... ........................... ................................... ---.................. .......... .-............... "'.....-
-. -.'"'.......................................... ---..... ........ --.................... .... -.............. -.-..............................
VOLUllES CEOIIETRY
E8 118 N8 S8 E8 118 N8 sa
LT 53 569 89 123 L 12.0 L 11 .0 L 12,0 L 12.0
TH 236 684 102 165 T 12,0 LT 11,0 T 12,0 T 12,0
RT 6lI 166 246 158 T 11.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 T 11.0
U 25 50 100 50 R 9.0 R 13.0 R 10.0 R 9.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
........... -.......... ---... --- ... -----...... -- .... ---- -.-.. -.- ....... -..-... ........... .........--
vou.ln GEDllETRY
E8 118 N8 S8 E8 III N8 S8
LT 142 334 90 290 L 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0
TH 709 274 350 228 T 12,0 LT 11.0 T 12,0 T 12.0
RT az 125 68a 65 T 11.0 T 11.0 T 11,0 T 11.0
RR 30 50 340 25 R 9.0 R 13.0 R 10.0 R 9,0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
-... ...................... ......- .......---.............. .....-O'..... _......................._.. _............ ..__........................
ADJUSTIlENT FACTORS ADJUST"ENT FACTORS
CRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USES PH' PEDS PEO, BUT, AU. TTPE GRADE NY ADJ PKC 8USES PHF PEDS PED, BUT, AU, TYPE
(1) Ol> TIN N. Nb TlH .in T (X) (X) TIN N. Nb TIN .In T
E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 Y 25,1 3 E8 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0.95 0 Y 25.1 3
118 -2.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 Y 25.1 3 118 -2,00 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 Y 25,1 3
N8 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0,95 0 Y 25,4 3 N8 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0.95 0 T 25.4 3
S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 Y 25,4 3 S8 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0.95 0 Y 25,4 3
............................................................................................................................. -................ ......... ...... .--........ .... ...... ........ .... ... ..........................................................
SICNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENCTH . 106.0 SIGNAL SETTINCS CYCLE LENCTH . 125.0
PH'1 PH-2 PH-3 PH'4 PH'1 PH'2 PH-3 PH.4 PH.1 PH.2 PH-3 PH.4 PH.1 PH.2 PH.3 PH.4
E8 LT X N8 LT X X E8 LT X N8 LT X X
TH X TH X X TH X TH X X
RT X RT X X RT X RT X X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
118 LT X S8 LT X X III L T X S8 LT X X
TH X TH X X TH X TH X X
RT X RT X X RT X RT X X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
CREEN 17.0 34.0 0,0 0,0 GREEN 6.0 7,0 6.0 15.0 GREEN 31.0 21,0 0.0 0,0 CREEN 11 .0 7.0 11.0 n.o
YELLOII 3,5 3,5 0,0 0_0 YELLCIlI 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 YELLCIlI 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 TELlClll 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
..............................................................................................................-................................ -.
.... ... ............... .... ....... ....... ............ ............. ...................... ...........................
LEVEL OF SElVI CE LEVEL OF SElVI CE
LANE GRP, V/C C/C DELAY LOS IoPp, DELAT IoPp, LOS LANE GRP, V/C C/C DELAY LOS IoPp, DELAY IoPP. LOS
E8 L 0,200 0,165 29,1 0 26,4 D E8 L 0.350 0.252 29,4 0 34.0 D
T 0,450 0,165 26,1 0 T 0.1186 0,252 35.6 0
R 0.203 0,165 24,7 C R 0,151 0.252 23,5 C
118 L 0,711 0.325 29,9 0 25.6 0 III L 0,731 0.1n 43,5 E 37,1 D
LT 0,134 0,325 24,7 C L T 0,767 O,1n 35,4 0
R 0,237 0.325 16,9 C R 0.290 0,172 29,3 0
N8 L 0,345 0,160 30.4 0 24,7 C N8 L 0,311 0,176 34.4 0 47,2 E
T 0,131 0.245 20,2 C T 0,405 O,2n 24.2 C
R 0,504 0,217 24,5 C R 1,041 0.241 74.9 ,
S8 L 0,507 0,151 32.1 D 25,4 0 sa L 0.1167 0.201 50.1 E 35,9 D
T 0.220 0.236 21, T C T 0.236 0.304 21,1 C
R 0.401 0.20l1 23,9 C R 0,111 0,210 21,6 C
.............................................................................................................................................. . ............................ -.................................................. --................................................................
INTERSECTION: Delay. 25,5 (lee/v.h) V/C . 0.512 LOS . 0 INTERSECTION: Oelay . 38.6 (sec/veh) VIC . 0,714 LOS . D
4
1985 HOl: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Sl.t9IART REPORT
...........................................................................
IHTERSECTlON..WINCMESTER RD./TNEZ RD,
AREA TYPE.., ..OTHER
AHAUST.. .. , ..RAD
DATE.....,.. ..09-15'199
TIME,........ ,AM PEAIC Hl1lR
COIlMENT.. .. .. ,EX I STI HG CONO IT I ONS
VOllJlE S llEDllETRT
EI WI NI SI EI WI NI 51
LT 155 21D 354 16 L 12.D L 12,D L 12,0 L 12.0
TH 272 554 55 45 T 12,D T 12,D L 12,D T 12,0
RT 3M 35 82 102 T 12,0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 14,0
RR 200 5 40 0 T 11.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 9.0
R 11.0 R 9.0 R lD.O 12.0
12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0
........ _...-... -.- --...... --.......... -- .......................... -.-..---.... -- ---... ......-... -.... .-.. _...- ---... --......--
1985 HOl: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Sl.MWtT REPORT
................ ..... ........... ...... ... ... ... ..... ......... .............
INTERSECTlON..WINCHESTER RD./yNEZ RD.
AlIEA TYPE.... ,OTHER
ANAU ST . .. .. .. RAD
DATE".",'., .09'15.199
TIllE.. .. .. , .. ,PM PEAIC NaIR
COlIIENT,.... ..EXISTING CONDITIONS
VOllJlES GEDllETRT
EI WI NI 51 EI WI NI 51
LT 245 150 558 46 L 12,0 L 12,0 L 12,0 L 12,0
TH 494 360 107 115 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12,0 T 12,0
RY 678 25 241 154 T 12,0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 14.0
RR 475 5 120 0 T 11.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 9.0
R 11.0 R 9.0 R 10.0 12.0
12.D 12.0 12.0 12.0
ADJUSTIlENT fACTORS ADJUSTMENT fACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PICG BUSES PHf PEDS PED. BUT, AlIR, TYPE GRADE MV ADJ PICG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. IUT, AU, TYPE
(X) (X) TIN N. Nb TIN .in T (X) (X) TIN N. Nb TIN .In T
EI 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 26,5 3 EI O,DO 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 26,5 3
WI 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 26,5 3 WI 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 26,5 3
NI 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 31,4 3 NI O.DO 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 31,4 3
51 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 31.4 3 SI O,DO 2,00 N 0 0 0.95 0 T 31,4 3
EI LT
TH
RY
PO
WI LT
TN
RT
PO
GREEN
TELLOlI
SIGNAL SETTINGS CTCLE LENGTH. 105.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CTCLE LENGTH . 125.0
PH.3 PH'4 PH-l PN'2 PH'3 PH.4 PH.l PH'2 PH.3 PH-4 PH.l PH.2 PH'3 PH.4
NI LT X X EI LT X X NI LT X X
X TN X X TN X X TH X X
X RT X X RT X X RT X X
X PO X PO X PO X
X 51 LT X X WI LT X 51 Ll X
X X TN X X TN X TH X
X X RT X X RT X RT X
X PO X PO X PO X
8,0 23.0 GREE. 8,0 7.0 6.0 11.0 CREEN 17,0 9.5 26.0 0,0 CREEN 16,0 20.0 15.5 0,0
3.5 3.5 TELLOlI 3,5 3.5 3,5 3,5 TELLOlI 3,5 3.5 3.5 0.0 TELLOlI 3.5 3.5 3,5 0,0
PH-I PH.2
X X
X
X
X
8,0 6.0
3.5 3,5
....... --- -"--."""'''' -..-......... -- ........ ........ ..............-.....-.......... -. ....... .................
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE CRP. V/C G/C DELAT LOS APP, DELAT APP, LOS
EI L 0,562 0,171 32,2 D 21,7 C
T 0,189 0,314 17,0 C
R 0,470 0,286 20,5 C
WI L 0,616 0.190 34.1 0 21,4 C
T 0,364 0,333 17,2 C
R o,on 0.305 16.8 C
NI L 0.659 0,181 32,3 D 30,2 D
T 0,083 0.210 21,6 C
R 0,174 0,181 23.5 C
51 L 0,058 0.171 27,7 D 23,3 C
TR 0.247 0.200 22,9 C
.... -"--'" .......-.............. -----..--..-..... ....-.. ......-... .---............... - - -....-. ... -.-.-....
I NTERSECTI ON: Deley . 23,6 (see/veh) v/C . 0,436 LOS . C
LEVEL OF SERVI CE
LAIlE ClIIP, V/C G/C DELAT LOS APP, DELAT APP. LOS
EI L 0,624 0,244 34,1 D 25,0 D
T 0,342 0,316 21,2 C
R 0,498 0,292 24,3 C
WI L 0,666 0,140 43,5 E 31,5 0
T O,3n 0,212 27,3 D
. 0,074 0,212 25,5 D
.1 L O,51l1 0,320 27,7 D 25,8 D
T 0.107 0,316 19,5 C
R 0,310 0.292 22,4 C
sa L 0,217 0.132 36,9 0 38.9 D
TR 0,775 0,128 39,1 D
...... -.... -....... - -...... -.... -.................................................... -....................
INTERSECTJ ON: Deley . 28,4 (sec/veh) V/C . 0.573 LOS . 0
5
1985 HCM: SICNALIZEll INTERSECTIONS
SUHllAIT IEPOU
1985 HCM: SICNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS
SUMIlAIT REPORT
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
INTERSECTlON..RANCHO CALIFORNIA 10/1-15 SI lAMPS
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANAL TST ...... .MS
DATE........ ..08-01-1991
TIME..........AII
COI4I4ENT.......EXISTING CONDITIONS
INTERSECTION..RANCHO CALifORNIA 10/1-15 SI IAIIPS
AIEl. TYPE.... .OTHER
ANALYST..,.. ..liS
DAlE......... .08,01 .1991
TIllE.......... PII
ClM4ENT,.... ..EXISTING CONDITIONS
VOLUMES GEOMETIT VOLLMES GEOMETIT
EI 118 NI SI EI \/I NI SI EI \/I NI SI EI \/I NI SI
L T 0 224 0 421 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 L 12,0 LT 0 280 0 574 T 12.0 12_0 12.0 L 12.0
TH 596 984 0 0 T 12,0 12.0 12.0 LI 12.0 TH 1313 759 0 0 T 12_0 12.0 12,0 LI 12.0
IT 133 0 0 483 T 10.0 14.0 12.0 I 12.0 IT 251 0 0 238 T 10,0 14.0 12.0 . 12.0
U 50 0 0 242 . 10.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 II 126 0 0 119 I 10.0 12.0 12_0 12_0
12.0 12_0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
ADJUSTIIENT FACTORS ADJUSTIIENT FACTORS
ClADE NV AD J PKC IUSES PH' PEDS PED. BUT. AIR. TYPE ClADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PH' PEDS PED. IUT. AU. TYPE
ex) ex) TIN Nil Nb TIN lI;n T eX) eX) TIN Nil Nb TIN lI;n T
EB 2.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 T 14.3 4 EI 2.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 T 14.3 4
118 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 T 14.3 4 \/I 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 T 14.3 4
N8 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 27.8 3 NI 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 27,8 3
S8 2.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 27.8 3 SI 2.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 27.8 3
SIGNAL SETTINGS
PH'1 PH'2 PH'3 PH-4
CYCLE LENCTH. 90.0
PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
SIGNAL SETTINGS
PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
CTCLE LENGTH. 95.0
PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
EB LT NI LT EI LT NI LT
TH X TH TH X TH
IT X IT U X IT
PO X PO PO X PO
118 LT X SI LT X WI LT X SI LT
TN X X TH TH X X TN
RT IT X IT IT
PO X PO PO X PO
GIEEN 24.0 24,0 0.0 0.0 GIEEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 30.0 0.0 0,0 GIEEN
TELLOII 4.0 4,0 0.0 0.0 TELLOII 4.0 0.0 0_0 0.0 TELLOII 4_0 4,0 0.0 0.0 TELLOW
X
32.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
LEVEL Of SEIVI CE
LANE CIP. V/C G/C DELAT LOS APP. DELAT
EI T 0.506 0.278 13.0 I 12_9
I 0.244 0.278 11.9 I
118 L 0.529 0.278 21.8 C 8.3
T 0.531 0.589 5.3 I
SB L 0.466 0.344 18.0 C 17.6
LI 0.697 0,344 18.8 C
I 0.259 0.344 13.8 I
APP. LOS
I
-... .... -..-- --.........-.... .... ............. .-.................. -..---...........-........................... --.... ---.....-.
LEVEL Of SEIVICE
LANE GIP, V/C GtC DELAT LOS APP. DELAT APP. LOS
EI T 0,948 0.326 25.3 0 24.2 C
I 0,314 0.326 11.4 B
WI L 0.794 0.232 33.5 0 12.4 I
T 0.409 0.589 5.0 I
SI L 0,630 0.347 21.5 C 20.4 C
LI 0,735 0.347 20.7 C
I 0.128 0,347 13,7 I
c
INTERSECTION:
Deley. 11.9 esee/veh) V/C. 0.592
LOS . I
I NTERSE CT ION:
Deley' 19.6 esee/vell) V/C. 0.827
LOS . C
6
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION,.RANCHa CALIFORNIA Ra/l-15 NI RAMPS
AREA TYPE... ..aTHER
ANAL YST . .. .. . .MS
DATE......... .08-01-1991
Tl ME .. , . .. .. . . AM PEAK HClJR
COMMENT..... ..EXISTING CONOI TIONS
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMllARY REPORT
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION..RANCHa CALIFORNIA RO/l-15 NI RAMPS
AREA TYPE... ..aTHER
ANALYST....,. .MS
DATE.... .,.., .08,0.1- 1991
TIME..........PM
COMMENT ...,..,EXISTlNG CONDITIONS
VOLUMES GEOMETRT VOLUMES GEOMETRT
EI lIB U 51 EI lIB NI 51 EI WI NI 51 EI lIB NI SI
LT 366 a 132 0. 12.0. T 12,0. LR 11.0. 12.0. LT 366 0. 112 0. L 12.0. T 12,0. LR 11.0. 12.0.
TN 1525 793 0. 0. 12.0. T 12.0. R 11.0. 12.0. TH 1365 737 0. 0. T 12,0. T 12,0. R 11.0. 12.0.
RT 0. 571 446 0. 13.0. T 10..0. 12,0. 12,0. RT 0. 556 406 0. T 13.0. T 10..0. 12,0. 12.0.
RR 0. 286 0. 0. 12.0. R 10..0. 12.0. 12,0. RR 0. 278 0. 0. 12.0. R 10..0. 12.0. 12_0.
12,0. 12.0. 12.0. 12.0. 12.0. 12.0. 12.0. 12.0.
12.0. 12,0. 12.0. 12.0. 12.0. 12,0. 12.0. 12.0.
.......................-...........-................-.......-.--..............-...........--.................. .. -..-............... -. -- -- --...........-.....- .......-...... """ -..-........................................... ..--........ ---..
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR, TYPE GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT, AU. TYPE
(X) (X) TIN Nm Nb TIN lIin T (X) (X) TIN H. Nb TIN lOin T
EB 0..0.0. 2.0.0. N 0. 0. 0..90 50. T 8,5 4 EI 0..0.0. 2.0.0. N 0. a 0..90 50. T 8.5 4
\/B 2.0.0. 2.0.0. N a a 0..90 sa T 8,5 4 lIB 2.0.0. 2.0.0. N a a 0..90 sa T 8.5 4
HI 2.0.0. 2.0.0. N 0. a 0..90 50. N 22.8 3 NI 2.00 2.0.0. N 0. 0. 0..90 50. N 22.8 3
SI 0..0.0. 2.0.0. N 0. 0. 0..90 50. N 22.8 3 SI 0..0.0. 2.0.0. N 0. 0. 0..90 sa N 22,8 3
SIGNAL SETTINGS
PH'1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
EI LT X NI L T
TH X X TH
RT RT
PO X PO
\/1 LT SI LT
TH X TH
RT X RT
PO X PO
GREEN 25.0. 30.,0. 0..0. 0..0. GREEN
YELLO\I 4.0. 4.0. 0..0. 0..0. TEUO\I
CTCLE LENGTH. 90.0.
PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
x
x
23,0
4.0.
0..0.
0..0.
0..0.
0..0.
LEVEL DF SERVI CE
LANE GRP. V/C GtC DELAT LDS APP. DELAT APP. LDS
EI L 0..832 0..289 30..8 0 10.,6 I
T 0..738 0..667 5.9 I
\/1 T 0..543 0..344 11.4 I 12.4 I
R 0..678 0..344 15,5 C
HI LR 0..994 0..267 49.6 E 38.5 0
R 0..638 0..267 20.,9 C
INTERSECTION:
081.y' 15.5 (see/vell) V/C' 0.,811
LOS . C
0..0.
0..0.
SIGNAL SETTINGS
PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
EI LT X NI LT
TH X X TH
RT RT
PO X PO
lIB LT SI LT
TH X TH
RT X RT
PO X PO
GREEN 25.0. 30.,0. 0..0. 0..0. GREEN
TELLO\I 4.0. 4,0. 0..0. 0.,0. TEUO\I
0..0.
0..0.
PH-I
X
CTCLE LENGTH' 90.0.
PH-2 PH.3 PH-4
x
23.0.
4.0.
0..0.
0..0.
0..0.
0..0.
LEVEL aF SERVICE
LANE GllP. V/C GIC DELAT LOS APP. DELAT APP. LOS
EI L 0..832 0.,289 30..8 0 10..4 I
T 0.,660 0..667 5,2 I
lIB T 0.,504 0.,344 11.2 I 12,2
1\ 0..661 0..344 15.2 C
NI La 0.,88] 0..267 32.5 0 27.6 0
1\ 0..580 0..267 19.9 C
INTERSECTION:
O.l.y. 13,6 (see/vell) V/C. 0.,724
LOS . I
7
1985 NCIl: SICNAlIZED INTERSECTIONS
SlHIARY REPORT
19a5 NCIl: SIGNALIZED INTEISECTlONS
Sl.MlART I EPaR T
... ....................... ...... .... ....... ............ ....... ....... .....
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION......NCNO CALifORNIA ID./FIONT ST,
AIEA TYPE.., ..OTNER
ANAUST...... ,lAD
DATE,.",..., .09'09-1991
TI ME, _ , .. .. .. ,All PEAIC NCUll
CCtlMENT,..,.. .EXIST I NG CONDIT IONS
INTEISECTIOlI..UNCIKl CALIFORNIA ID./FIONT ST,
....U TYPE.... .DTNER
ANAUST, . , .. .. RAIl
DATE.....,.. ..09-09.1991
TI ME, .. .. .. , .. PM PEAr: NOUl
COIIIENT...... .EXISTlNG CONDITIONS
VOLlJIES GEC>>IETRT VOLlIIES GECMETI'
EI \/I NI SI : EI \/I NI SI EI \/I NI SI : EI \/I NI $I
LT 104 320 T43 226 : L 12.0 L 11.0 L 12,0 L 12,0 LT 116 354 65 494 : L 12,0 11,0 L 12,0 L 12.0
TN 229 562 318 169 : T 12,0 T 11,0 T 13.0 T 12,0 TN 6llI 271 245 528 : T 12,0 11.0 T 13,0 T 12.0
IT 7' 492 174 96 : TI 14.0 T 11,0 I 12,0 I 15.0 IT 126 383 336 118 : TI 14.0 11.0 I 12.0 I 1$,0
II 0 275 87 0 11.0 I 10.0 12.0 12.0 II 0 192 200 o : 11.0 10.0 12,0 12.0
11.0 12,0 11.0 12,0 11.0 12,0 11.0 12,0
12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0
...........................-.................-................... --......... -.. ---................ -...... --..... '"'..-...... _..- "'''- --. --......... -.... -- -..- -. ........................ --.......- ...-..................... "'..............................................
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AIlJUSTMENT FACTOIS
GlADE NV AOJ PICG 8USES PNF PEDS PEO, BUT, ....1, TYPE GlAllE NV ADJ PICG BUSES PHf PEDS PEO, BUT, AU, TYPE
(:r;) (:r;) TIN Na Nb TIN .in T (:r;) (:r;) Y/N Na Nb Y/. .In T
EI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 T 21.0 3 EI 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 21.5 3
\/I 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 T 21,0 3 \/I 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 Y 21.5 3
N8 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0,95 0 , 23.0 3 NI 0,00 2,00 . 0 0 0.95 0 T 23.0 3
S8 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 T 23,0 3 SI 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 , 23,0 3
........ --................. --.......... --.......-.. -................... -.....-.............. --...................................... ............... --.............................. - -.. - -... - - - -. - - - -..... - -.. - -.. --. -..... -..... -. -.. -......-
SICNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH. 100.0 SICNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTN . 110,0
PN-l PN'2 PN-3 PH.4 PH-I PN-2 PH-3 PN-4 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
EI LT X NI LT X X EI LT X NI LT X
TN X TH X X TH X TN X
IT X IT X X IT X IT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
\/I LT X X 51 LT X X \/I LT X X 58 LT X
TN X X TH X X TH X X TN X X
IT X X IT X X IT X X IT X X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
GIEEN 11.0 18,5 13.0 0,0 GIEEN 7,0 11.0 7.0 8,0 GlEEN 13,0 5,0 27.5 0,0 GlEEN 7.0 21.0 15.5 0.0
YELLOW 3.5 3.5 3.5 0,0 YELLOW 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 YELLOW 3.5 3,5 3.5 0.0 YELLOW 3.5 3_5 3.5 0.0
......................................................... ........................... -.......... ................... ........ ................... .......... ...-....... ..... ..... ............... ............... ..................
LEVEL Of SElVI CE LEVEL Of SERVI CE
LANE GlP, V/C GIC DELAT LOS APP, OELAT AlP, LOS LAIIE GlP, V/C G/C OELA' LOS APP. DELAT APP, LOS
EI L 0.562 0,115 34.6 D 30,9 0 EI L 0,581 0.123 37.8 0 42.6 E
Ta 0,714 0,135 29,7 0 TI 0,986 0.255 43.2 E
WIl L 0.612 0,335 22,6 C 1.,6 C WIl L 1,135 0.200 124.9 F 64.0
T 0,506 0,355 16.6 C T 0,261 0,332 17_4 C
I 0,500 0,325 18,2 C a 0.469 0.305 20,6 C
NI L 0.404 0.220 25,. 0 27,2 D NI L 0,593 0,061 43,3 E 48.6 E
T 0,793 0.230 29.2 D T 0,966 0,145 58_9 E
I 0,301 0,200 22,1 C a 0,641 0,145 32,4 D
SI L 0,711 0,180 38,1 0 30,. 0 $I L 1,056 0,291 71,4 f 48,0 E
T 0,525 0.190 24,6 C T 0.147 0.361 26,6 0
I 0,379 D,16O 24,6 C I 0.219 0.341 16.7 C
.................... .................. .......... ................. .......... ..... .......... ........ ......
INTERSECTION:
Oeley' 24,8 (see/vell) V/C. 0,710
LOS . C
INTElSECTlON:
Del.y' 50,4 (see/vell) V/C' 1.039
LOS . E
8
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
~RY REPORT
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUIlMART REPORT
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
INTERSECTlON..RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD./TNEZ RD,
AREA TYPE.... ,OTHER
ANAL TST ...... .RAD
DATE, _... ,.. ..09-15-199
TIME... _..... ,All PEAK HOUR
ta94ENT,.... ..EXIST ING CONDITIONS
INTERSECTION..RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD./TNEZ RD.
AREA TYPE..,.. OT HER
ANAUST.., _, ..RAD
DATE""" _" .09-15-199
TIME...... '.. ,PM PEAl HOUR
COMMENT,.... ..EXISTING CONDIT IONS
.................................................................................................................................................. ..
VOI.'-"ES GECMETRY
EI \/I NB SB : EB \/I NB 51
LT 164 134 350 64: 12.0 L 11.0 L !l.0 L 12,0
TN 512 869 13& 163 12.0 T 12.0 T 13,0 T 12.0
RT 246 105 116 232 11.0 T 11.0 I 12.0 I 14.0
RR 125 55 55 120 9.0 I 10.0 11,0 9.0
11.0 9.0 10,0 lZ.0
12,0 12,0 12.0 12_0
EI
LT 37&
TN 1291
RT 312
RR 156
VOI.'-"ES
\/I NB
192 169
az& 21&
166 1110
&5 90
51
178 L
214 T
361 : T
200 R
EB
12,0
12,0
11.0
9.0
11,0
12.0
L
T
T
R
GECIME TRY
\/I NI
11.0 L 12,0
12.0 T 13.0
11.0 I 12.0
10.0 11.0
9.0 10,0
12.0 12,0
L
T
R
SB
11,0
11.0
12.0
11.0
12.0
12.0
.. -.-............ -........... -.................. ............. ....... ........ .............. ......................... -....
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PXG BUSES PHF PEOS PEO, BUT, ARR, TYPE GlADE HV ADJ PXG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT, ARR. TYPE
(Xl (Xl TIN Na Nb TIN .In T (Xl (X) TIN Na Nb TIN .in T
EI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,0 3 EI 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,3 3
\/I O,OD 2,00 N 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,0 3 III 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.9$ 0 T 21,3 3
NB 0,00 2,00 H 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,5 3 NB 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,5 3
51 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,5 3 SI 0,00 2,00 H 0 0 0,9$ 0 T 21,5 3
-..... ..... ......................................................................................................................................
X
SIGNAL SErr I NGS CTCLE LENGTH. 100.0
PH-3 PH-4 PH'I PH-Z PH-3 PH-4
NI LT X X EI LT
X TH X X TH
X RT X X RT
X PO X PO
X SI LT X III LT
X X TH X TH
X X RT X RT
X PO X PO
7.0 24.0 GREEII 10,5 10,0 11.0 0,0 GREEII
3,5 3,5 TEHQI 3.5 3,5 3,5 0.0 TELLQI
PH.l PH-Z
X X
X
X
EI LT
TH
RT
PO
\/I LT
TN
RT
PO
GREEN
TEUQI
X
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 100,0
PH-3 PH-4 PH-I PH-Z PH-3 PH-4
NI LT X X
X TH X X
X RT X X
X PO X
X SB LT X X
X X TH X X
X X RT X X
X PO X
6.0 19.0 GREEN 5.0 4.5 5.0 1.0
3,5 3,5 TELLQI 3,5 3.5 3,5 3.5
PH-I PH-Z
X X
X
X
7.0 6.0
3.5 3,5
5.5 20,0
3,5 3.5
................... -.. -...... -..... - -......-.......................................................4O."'................. _....404O....
LEY!l Of SEIV I CE LEVEL OF SERVI CE
LANE GRP, V/C G/C DELAY LOS IoPp, DELAT IoPp, LOS LAIIE GRP, V/C G/C DELAT LOS IoPp, DELAT IoPp, LOS
EI L 0.325 0,170 21,& D 29,0 D E8 L 0,791 0,295 30,& D 25,9 D
T 0,911 0,340 32,3 D T 0,9$0 0,430 25,9 D
R 0,300 0,310 11,1 C R 0,302 0,400 13,3 B
\/I L O,4n 0,180 28,9 D 21,5 C III L 0,]94 0,155 41,6 E 30,1 D
T 0.1aZ 0,350 ZO.& C T 0,&99 0,290 2&,6 D
R 0,111 O,3Z0 15,5 C I 0,234 0,260 1&,9 C
NI L O.ass 0.245 41,9 E 34,0 D NB L 0,171 0,135 42,3 E 36.4 D
T 0.311 0,250 19,& C T 0,801 0,155 35,4 D
I O,19Z 0,220 20,6 C I 0,499 0,125 27,9 D
SB L 0.362 0,110 31,9 D 36,& D SI L 0,&15 0,140 45,1 E 4Z,l E
T 0.831 0,115 42,5 E T 0,&14 0,160 36,0 D
I 0.634 0,115 31,3 D I 0.890 0,130 4&.1 E
I NTERSECT ION:
Oel.y. 2&.0 (sec/vehl v/C. 0,1109
LOS . D
INTElSECTlaI:
Del.y. 30.6 (sec/vehl V/C. 0,&76
LOS . D
10
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUl4MARV REPORT
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED lNTERSECTlOIIS
SUMMARV REPORT
..........................................................................
.................-......................................-.................
I NTERSECTlOll..D lAZ RD ./RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD,
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANALVST...... .A,P,
DATE........ ..09-D5. 1991
T I ME..... .... ,AM PEAK HOJR
COMMENT....... EXISTING COIIDIT IONS
INTERSECTlOll..DIAZ RD./RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD,
AREA TYPE... ..OTHER
ANALYST.......A.P,
DATE........ ..09.D5'1991
TIME,.......,.PM PEAK HOUR
CDMMENT...., ..EXISTING CONDITJOIIS
.............. ........................ ....-... ................... ............ -........ ................. ........ -..-........ ..---......
VOLUMES GECII1ETRV
EI WI NB SB EB WI NB SB
L T 45 10 0 119 L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0
TH 269 525 2 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12,0 L T 12.0
RT 1 293 8 61 TR 12.0 TR 12,0 12.0 R 12,0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 8.0 8.0
12,0 12,0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
VOLUMES GECII1ETRV
EI WI NB SB EI WI NB SB
LT 47 34 2 301 L 12,0 L 12,0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0
TH 561 296 2 4 T 12,0 T 12,0 12,0 LT 12.0
RT 2 90 39 64 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 R 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12,0 8.0 8.0
12,0 12,0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
...... ................... .................. ....... .......... -..... -- -..........-................ -... -.......................................
ADJUSTMENT fACTORS ADJUSTMENT fACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHf PEDS PED. BUT, ARR. TYPE GRADE HV AD J PKG BUSES PHf PEDS PED, BUT. ARR, TYPE
(X) (X) V/N NOI Nb V/N In;" T (X) (X) V/N N. Nb V/N .in T
EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 V 16.8 3 EI 0.00 2.DO N 0 0 0.90 0 V 16.8 3
WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 V 16.8 3 WI 0,00 2.DO N 0 0 0.90 0 V 16.8 3
NB 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 V 25.8 3 NB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 V 25.8 3
SB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 V 25.8 3 SB O.DO 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 V 25.11 3
....... -..--.. ............... ...........-- -..-...... ..........-.. -.. --- -.-.. ...... -.........................-.. -.-...... ............................. -....................................-..........................................................................
SIGNAL SETTINGS CTC~E LENGTH. 70.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 70.0
PH'1 PH'2 PH.3 PH.4 PH-1 PH.2 PH-3 PH.4 PH-1 PH.2 PH.3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH.3 PH-4
EB L T X X N8 LT X E8 LT X X N8 LT X
TH X X TH X TH X X TH X
IT X X IT X IT X RT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
WI LT X X S8 LT X WI LT X X S8 LT X
TH X X TH X TH X X TH X
RT X X RT X RT X RT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
GREEN 6.0 6.0 6.0 16.0 GREEN 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 6.0 6.0 13.0 GREEN 19.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOII 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 YELLOII 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOlI 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 VELLOlI 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
...........................-....... -......-............................. ............ ...................................... ...... ............... .... ....-..... ............ ........... .............. .............................................
LEVU OF SERVI CE LEVEL Of SERVI CE
LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAT LOS APP. DELAV APP. LOS LANE GaP, V/C G/C DELAV LOS APP. DELAV APP. LOS
EB L 0,122 0.243 15.7 C 10.2 8 E8 L 0,127 0,243 15.7 C 12.5 8
T. 0.229 0.386 9,4 B TR 0.538 0.343 12.3 B
WB L 0.027 0.243 15,3 C 13.2 B WI L 0.092 0.243 15.6 C 11.7 B
T. 0.734 0.386 13.2 B T. 0.382 0.343 11.3 B
NB LTR 0,032 0.243 13,1 B 13,1 B N8 LT. 0,119 0,286 11.9 B 11.9 B
SB L 0,152 0.243 15.8 C 14.3 B S8 L 0.373 0,286 15,4 C 13,9 B
L T 0.152 0.243 13.5 B LT 0.372 0,286 13.1 B
R 0.182 0.243 13,6 B . 0,163 0.286 12.1 B
.............................. ..... ................ .............................................................. .............. ......
INTERSECTION:
O.ley. 12.7 (see/vell) vie. 0.409
LOS . B
lNTERSECTlOII:
D.ley. 12.6 (see/v.h) V/C. 0.359
LOS . 8
11
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION. .HORAGA RD./RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANALTST...... .A.P.
eATE......... .09-05-1991
TIME..........AM PEAK HOUR
COMMENT..... ..EXI STl NG CONDITIONS
VOLUI4ES GEOMETRY
E8 118 HI SI EI 10'1 NI 51
L T 78 0 0 53 12.0 T 12,0 L 12.0 L 12.0
TM 435 757 0 0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0
RT 0 28 0 232 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12,0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 8.0 8,0
12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12_0 12.0 12.0
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS
Sl.IlMARY REPORT
..................... ........................... ...........................
INTERSECTION..HORAGA RD./RANCHO CALIFORNIA RO.
AREA TYPE..,. .OTHER
ANALYST...... .A.P.
DATE......... .09-05' 1991
TIME,........ ,PM PEAK HOUR
COMMENT.. . .. . . EX I STI NG COIIO IT I ONS
.............................................................................. "'..........................................................................................................................
VOlUl4ES GEOMETRY
E8 118 NI 51 : E8 10'1 NI 51
LT 304 0 0 42 : 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0
TH 974 571 0 0 12.0 T 12_0 T 12.0 12.0
RT 0 52 0 224 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12,0
RR 0 0 0 0 12,0 12,0 8,0 8.0
12,0 12.0 11.0 12,0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
...... ...-................ --... --.... ---...............-.-............ ..... .......-...... -........... --...................-.-........... --...........
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTOIlS
GRADE MV ADJ PKG IUSES PHF PEDS PED. IUT. ARR, TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE
(Xl (Xl Y/N Nil Hb TIN .in T (Xl (Xl TIN N. Hb Y/N m;n T
EI 0,00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 Y 25,1 3 E8 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25,1 3
1/1 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25_1 3 10'1 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 Y 25.1 3
HI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 Y 31.1 3 NI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 31.1 3
51 0,00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 31.1 3 51 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 31.1 3
.............. ---.... -.'" ........ -----.....................'" ........- ................. -- ...---..... .......-... .............. -.... ---- .... -............................"'..............................................................................................................................
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 70.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 100.0
PI'" PH-2 PH.3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH'3 PH-' PH'1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
EI L T X NI LT EI LT X NI LT
TH X TH TH X TH
RT RT RT RT
PO PO PO PO
1/1 L T 51 LT X 10'1 LT 51 LT X
TH X TH TH X TH
RT X RT X RT X RT X
PO X PO PO X PO X
GREEN 6.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26_0 . 36.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOII 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOII 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 YELLOII 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOII 4,0 0.0 0.0 0,0
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LAHE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP, LOS
EI L 0.507 0.100 24.7 C 14,3 I
T 0.449 0.314 12,5 I
~I T 0.711 0,314 16.2 C 16.0 C
R 0.065 0.31' 10.9 I
51 L 0.014 0.457 8.2 I 1.1 I
R 0.369 0.457 1,1 I
.. -.... -...... - - -.. -............ ....... ........... ...o..... .o........ ....o....o.. ....o... .... .......... .....o.
INTERSECTION:
Oeley' 14,1 Uec/vehl V/C' 0,533
LOS. I
... .....o........... .... ........ ...... ......... ..... .........o...... _. ............ ..o... ._..........
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. VIC G/C OELAY LOS APP, OELAY APP, LOS
EI L 0.732 0,270 29,3 D 23,7 C
T 0_153 0.370 22.1 C
118 T 0,500 0.370 16,0 C 15,7 C
R 0,102 0.370 13.3 I
SI L 0,113 0.270 20,9 C 21.9 C
R 0,602 0.270 22.1 C
.. ....o..........................................o.................................o.......o....o.........
INTERSECTION:
Oeley. 21,2 (sec/vehl V/C, 0,599
LOS . C
12
1985 "CM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
S1.J4MARf REPORT
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SLlMMARY REPOR T
.......... ... .............. ........ ..... .... .-.- ... ....... ........ .... ..........
..........................................................................
INTUSECTIOII..RANC"O CALIFORNIA RD./MARGARITA RD.
AREA TYPE.... .DTHER
ANALTST..... ..A.P.
OA TE. . . .. . .. .. 09. 05. 1991
T I ME.. .. , .. .. . AM PEAIC MOJR
COMMENT...... .EXISTING COIIDIT IONS
IWTERSECTIOII..RAIICNO CALIFORWIA 10./MARGAllITA 10,
AREA TTPE,....OTHER
AWALTST..,.., .A,P,
OATE.......... 09-05-1991
TIllE .. .. . . .. .. PM PEAIC MOJR
COMMENT..... ..EXIST I NG CONDIT IONS
YOLlMES
EB liB NB
LT 37 15 109
T" 154 381 90
n 83 40 9
RR 0 0 0
SB
37 L
129 T
158 TR
o
E8
12.0 L
12.0 T
12.0 TR
12,0
12.0
12.0
GEOMETRY
118 NB
12,0 L 12.0 L
12.0 T 12.0 T
12,0 TR 12.0 TR
12,0 8.0
12.0 12.0
12,0 12.0
SB
12.0
12.0
12.0
8.0
12,0
12.0
VOLlJ4ES GECIIlETIY
EB 118 NB SB EB 118 NB SB
LT 236 23 135 163 L 12.0 L 12,0 L 12,0 L 12.0
TH 385 295 230 239 T 12.0 T 12,0 T 12,0 T 12.0
IT T49 59 28 130 : T 12.0 T 12,0 T 12.0 T 12.0
II 0 0 0 0 I 8.0 I 11.0 I 11,0 I 11,0
12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
.___e_... ",,,, '" '" "'..................._..... _.o......", _."''''. ....... _..... _..... ..__ ................... ..eo. _.._ _....... __....
ADJUSTMENT , ACTORS ADJUSTMENT , ACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PICG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE MV ADJ PICG BUSES PM' PEDS PEO. Bur. ARR. TTPE
(X) (X) TIN Nm Nb TIN min T (l) (l) TIN Nm Nb TIN .in T
EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 25.8 3 EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 25.8 3
118 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25.8 3 118 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 25.8 3
NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 T 25.8 3 NB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 25.8 3
SI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 25.8 3 SI 0,00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25.8 3
__........ _____e_.......... _......... ........................ "'''_''''''''_''' ........",....... --..... ......... ........... --... ..... -...-.....- ....-.......... -...- .....-..... -...- ...... ......-................. ...--.... --- ....-....."'...... -......... -.....
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 90.0 SIGNAL SETn NGS CYCLE LENGTH . 95.0
PH-I PH-2 PH.3 PH-4 PH.l p".2 PH.3 PH.4 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH.4 PH-I PH.2 PH.3 PH-4
EI LT X NI LT X EB LT X NB LT X
TM X TM X TN X TH X
RT X RT X IT X IT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
118 LT SB LT X 118 LT X SB LT X
TH X TN X TN X TN X
RT X RT X RT X IT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
GREEN 14.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 16,0 21.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 19.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 16.0 21.0 0.0 0.0
TELLOlI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 TELLOlI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLCIoI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 TELLCIoI 4,0 4.0 0.0 0.0
... -......-.. -.....-............. -.... --................................. .-..- .......................... ...---.................. ......- ....."......... .-.- ----....... --..... ----.................... ............... -..."......... -..-...... ---... -....................
LEVEL OF SEIVI CE LEVEL OF SEIV ICE
LANE GRP. V/C G/C OELAT LOS APP. OELA T APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP, DELAT APP. LOS
EB L 0.146 0.167 24,4 C 18,0 C EB L O,n8 0.211 31.5 0 23,5 C
TR 0,307 0.267 17,1 C T 0,494 0.253 19.9 C
118 L 0.059 0.167 24.0 C 18,7 C I 0,492 0.253 20.4 C
TR 0.524 0,267 18.6 C 118 L 0.071 0.211 22.8 C 19.1 C
NI L 0.379 0.189 24,6 C 21.0 C T 0.378 0.253 19,1 C
TR 0.134 0.244 17.2 C I 0,175 0.253 18.0 C
sa L 0.129 0.189 23.1 C 19.2 C NB L 0,490 0.179 27.7 0 22,3 C
TR 0.419 0.244 18.7 C T 0,322 0.232 19.6 C
-.........- --........... -.. --.....- ----.................... ...-...... --.................... ---.. ........... --.-...... ---.... I 0.091 0.232 18.5 C
INTERSECTION : Oeley . 19.1 (lee/vell ) V/C . O,5n LOS. C SB L 0.592 0.179 29.4 0 22.8 C
T 0,334 0.232 19.7 C
. 0.420 0.232 20.5 C
INTERSECT 1011:
Deley. 22.3 (see/veh) V/C. 0,551
~OS . C
13
1985 HCM: SICIIALIZED IHTUSECTIONS
SUl9WT REPOIlT
1985 HCM: SICIIALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SlHIARY REPOIlT
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
INTERSECTlON..SOLAHA \/ATlTNEZ liD,
AREA TTPE..... OTHU
ANALYST.,... ..A.P,
DATE........ ..09,05, 1991
TIME.. .. , .. , .. AM PEAl( HCAJII
COlMENT ..,..,.UISTING CllNOITIONS
INTUSECTlON..SOLANA IIAT/YNEZ RD,
AREA TTPE.., ..OTHU
ANALYST...... .RAD
DATE",..,., ..09' 15. 199
TlIIE..,.......PM PEAl( HCUII
ClJIIIENT..,.. ..EXISTING CONDIT lOllS
...................................................................... -........................-.. ........... -................................ .................................................................................................................................................. ..
YOLIJIES GEOMETRY VOLIJIES GEOMETRY
EI \/I NI 51: EI \/I NI 51 EI \/I NI SI : EI \/I NI SI
LT Z 143 3 144 : LTR lZ,O L 1Z.0 L lZ,O L lZ,O LT 10 130 4 448 : LTI lZ.0 L 11,0 L lZ.0 L 1Z.0
TN 3 0 161 Z66 : lZ.0 TI lZ,O TI lZ,O T 12,0 TN 6 Z 417 502 : 1Z,O TII 1Z.0 TR lZ.0 T lZ,O
RT 0 382 60 9 : lZ,O I lZ,O lZ,O T 12,0 IT 6 Z62 Z47 8 : 11,0 I lZ,O lZ,O TI 1Z,O
II 0 0 0 0 lZ,O 1Z.0 lZ.0 12,0 II 0 135 Z5 o : 9.0 10.0 11,0 11,0
lZ,O lZ,O lZ,O 12,0 11.0 9.0 10,0 lZ.0
lZ.0 lZ,O lZ,O lZ,O lZ.0 lZ.0 1Z.0 lZ.0
............... ............. ",..... ..... .......-............ ...... ................ ...................... ........O'.. ........ ......... ...O'...... ............ .._O'.......... .............. ................. .................... ._. _...................
ADJUSTMENT fACTOIIS ADJUSTMENT fACTOIIS
ClADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHf PEDS PED, IUT, All, TTPE GRADE HV ADJ PI(G IUSES PH' PEDS PEn, IUT, AU, TTPE
1:1:) 1:1:) TIN Nil Nb TIN .in T IX) IX) TIN N. Nb TIN lI;n T
EI 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0,90 0 T 19.8 3 EI 0.00 Z,OO N 0 0 0.95 0 T 17.5 3
\/I 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 T 19,8 3 \/I 0.00 Z.OO N 0 0 0.95 0 r 17,5 3
NI 0,00 0,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 11,3 3 NI 0.00 Z.OO N 0 0 0.95 0 T 14.3 3
SI 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0,90 0 T 11,3 3 51 0,00 Z,OO N 0 0 0,95 0 T 14,3 3
SICIIAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTN . 70,0 SICNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 100.0
PN'1 PN'Z PH.3 PH'4 PH-1 PN.2 PH'3 PH'4 PH" PH'Z PH'3 PH.4 PH.l PH-Z PH'3 PH.4
EI IT X NI LT X EI LT X NI LT X
TN X TN X TH X TH X
IT X IT X IT X RT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
\/I LT X SI LT X \/I LT X SI LT X X
TH X TH X TH X TH X X
IT X IT X IT X IT X X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
GREEN Z6.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 GREEN 16.0 16,0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5,0 Z5,O 41.0 0.0
YELLOII 4.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 TELLOII 4,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 TEL LOll 3,5 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOII 3,5 3,5 3,5 0.0
LEVEL Of SEIIVI CE LEVEL 0' SERV ICE
LAME GRP, V/C G/C DELAT LOS 1#', DELAT APP, LOS LANE GRP, vIe GIC DElAT LOS 1#', DELAT I#P, LOS
EI LTR 0.014 0.386 8,6 I 8,6 I EI LTR 0.123 0,155 23,5 e 23,S e
\/I L 0.Z48 0.386 11,' I 11,0 I loW L 0,514 0,155 30,9 0 Z8,' D
TI 0,180 0,386 9,2 I TI O,1ZZ 0,'55 Z3,5 C
I 0.540 0,386 11,4 I I 0,455 0,155 25,7 0
NI L 0,008 0.Z43 15,3 C 16,4 C NI L 0,045 0,055 34.0 D 33,7 D
TI 0,586 O.Z43 16,4 e TI 0,960 0,415 33,7 D
SI L 0.385 O,Z43 17,1 e 15,2 e SI L 0,819 0,340 29,3 D 15,2 e
T 0.355 O,Z43 14,3 I TI 0.226 0,700 3,5 A
................................................................... eo......................................... __.................... eo...... ...... -............. ..........................................................................................................................
lNTUSECTlON : Del., . 13.5 (see/vell) VIC . 0,509 LOS . I INTERSECTION: Del.y . 23,3 Isee/yell) V/C . O,83Z LOS . C
15
1985 HCH: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION..RANCHO VISTA RO./YNEZ RO,
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANAL TST.,.... .A.P,
DATE......... ,09.05.1991
TI ME .. .. .. .. . . AH PEA( HOUR
COMMENT...... .EXISTlNG CONOITIONS
VOl.UIIES GEOMETRT
E8 \/I NI SI E8 WI NI SI
LT 0 73 0 105 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12,0
TH 0 0 185 132 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0
RT 0 254 30 0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMART REPORT
........................-.................................................
INTERSECTlON..RANCHO VISTA RO./yNEZ RO,
AREA TYPE..,.. C80
ANAL TST.,..., .A.P,
DATE.....,... .09.05.1991
TIllE .. . .. .. .. . PH PEA( HOUR
COMMENT".... .EXISTING CONDITIONS
..... --...........-.............................. -. --... -....... ...................................................... ........ ........ --............ --.............
VOLlJIES GEOMETRY
EI III NI SI E8 \/I NI SI
LT 0 55 0 385 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 12.0
TM 0 0 260 292 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0
RT 0 177 126 0 R 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
.. -....................................................... --'" ............ '"'. -.......... .... -- -.......... -....... -. --...... ...... -..............
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRAOE HV ADJ P(G BUSES PHF PEOS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ P(G BUSES PHF PEDS PED, BUT. ARR. TYPE
(1) (t) T/H Nil Nb TIN m;n T (X) (X) TIN Na Nb TIN ..in T
EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 N 19.8 3 E8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3
118 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 WI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19,8 3
N8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 3 NI 0,00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 3
SB 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 3 SI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 3
............... --......... .""-"''''''''''''''''''' ---...........-.. -............ "'-_............ ............................ "'................................ --... ... ---............... -........ --............... --...........-........... "'. .... ... ...... ...... e_.... ............
SIGNAL SETTINGS CTCLE LENGTN . 70,0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CTCLE LENGTH . 85.0
PH.l PH.2 PH.3 PH.4 PH-I PM'2 PH.3 PH-4 PH'1 PH.2 PM.3 PH.4 PM.l PH.2 PM.3 PH.4
EB L T N8 LT E8 L T N8 LT
TH TH X TH TH X
RT RT X RT RT X
PO PO X PO PO X
\lB L T S8 LT \/I LT X SI LT X
TH TH X TH TH X
RT X RT RT X RT
PO PO PD PO
GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 21.0 0.0 0.0
TEL LOll 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TELLOII 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 TELLOII 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 TELLOII 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. VIC G/C OELA T LOS APP, OELAT APP. LOS
118 L 0.137 0.386 10.6 I 10.8 I
R 0.478 0.386 10,9 I
NB T 0.363 0.314 12.2 I 12.0 I
R 0.069 0.314 10.9 8
SB L 0.398 0.171 20,1 C 15.4
T 0.259 0,314 11.6 I
a _.....e e.................................................. e.............. e.. .................... .... ...._ _.. _.......
INTERSECTION:
Deley. 12.5 (Iee/velll V/C. 0,421
LOS . I
........- .... -.............................. -....... ........... ...-....... ...... ..................... .....-........... .........................
LEVEL OF SERVI CE
I.AIIE GRP, VIC G/C OELAT LOS APP. DELAT APP. LOS
WI L 0,140 0.318 15.7 C 15.4 C
R 0,450 0.318 15,4 C
NI T 0,689 0,259 21, I C 19.8 C
R 0,393 0.259 17,1 C
SI L 0,875 0.318 32, I 0 28.6 D
T 0.774 0.259 24,0 C
.. ........... -...-............... - ...... ................ ............. .......... -.............. .................
INTERSECTION:
Deley. 23.6 (see/vell) vIC. 0.670
LOS . C
16
1985 HCM: SIGNALlZEO INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT
............................................................................
INTERSECTION. .SANTIAGO RD./yNEZ RD,
AREA TYPE..... OTNER
A~AL YST..... ..A.P,
DATE........ ..09-05-1991
TIME..........AM PEAK HOUR
COMMENT..... ..EXISTING CONDITIONS
VOLUMES GEOMETRY
EB lIB NI SI EI \/I NI SI
L T 62 0 31 5 LT 12.0 L TR 12.0 L 12.0 L T 12.0
lH 10 4 68 60 R 12,0 10,0 TR 12.0 R 12.0
RT 24 8 4 119 10,0 12,0 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8,0
12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMIlARY REPORT
.. ............... ........ ......... ... ........... ....... ... ......... ... ........
INTERSECTION..SANTlAGO RD./YNEZ RD,
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANALyST...... .A.P.
DATE......... .09-05,1991
TI ME .. .. , .. , .. PM PEAK HOUR
COI4MENT, .. .. .. EX I ST I NG COND IT IONS
VOLlMES GEOMETRY
EI \/I NI SI EI \/I NI SI
LT 170 3 17 3 LT 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12,0 LT 12.0
TH 8 2 170 134 R 12.0 10,0 TR 12.0 R 12.0
RT B4 5 2 96 10,0 12,0 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 8.0 8.0 8,0 8.0
12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0
.. ... ............................................. -.--......................................................................... -..-...... --.....
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ P~G BUSES PHF PEDS PED, IUT. ARR, TYPE GRADE HV ADJ P~G IUSES PHF PEOS PED. IUT. ARR. TYPE
(II) (X) Y/N Nil Nb Y/N lIin T (X) (X) Y/N Nil Nb Y/N min T
EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3 EI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3
\/B 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3 \/I 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 19.8 3
NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 Y 21.8 3 NI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 21.8 3
SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 21.8 3 SI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 21.8 3
-................. -.............. ---........ ......... ......----........... ....... ............. ........... ............................. ......- ............... .......................... .......................-....... --.......................... ................- ...-..-........
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 60.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH. 60.0
PH.l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH.l PH.2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH'4 PH.l PH-2 PH'3 PH-4
EI LT X NI LT X EI LT X NI LT X
TH X TH X TH X TH X
RT X RT X RT X RT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
lIB LT X SI LT X \/I LT X SI LT X
TH X TH X TH X TH X
RT X RT X RT X RT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
GREEN 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 11.0 0,0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 .0.0 0.0
LEVEL OF SERVI CE
LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP. LOS
EI L T 0.232 0.200 13.1 I 13.0 I
R 0,087 0.200 12.6 I
\/B LTR 0.046 0.200 12,5 I 12.5 I
NI L 0,102 0.200 14.9 I 13.6 I
TR 0.226 0.200 13,0 I
5B LT 0.203 0.200 13,0 I 13,7 I
R 0.436 0.200 14,2 I
............... -...... ............ ..... ........... .... ......... ........... ............ .....
INTERSECTION:
Deley. 13,5 (see/vell) V/C. 0.522
LOS . I
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GaP. V/C Gle OELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS
EI LT 0.576 0,200 15.5 C 14.8 I
R 0,305 0,200 13.4 I
\/I LTR 0,038 0,200 12.5 I 12.5 I
NI L 0,056 0.200 14,8 8 15.0 I
TR 0,537 0.200 15,0 I
SI LT 0,440 0.200 14.1 I 13.9 I
R 0,352 0.200 13,6 I
... ................. ..... .......... .......... .... .................... ................ ........
INTERSECTION:
Oeley. 14.5 (see/vell) V/C. 0.548
LOS . I
18
1985 MCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIOIiS
SUMMARY REPORT
...... ................ ... ....... ............. ......... ....... ....... ......... .......
INTERSECTION..VIA MONTEZUMAlfRONT ST.I JEFfeRSON AVE.
AREA TYPE..... CBD
A~ALYST...... .A.P.
OATE......... .09-05' 1991
TIME..........AM PEAK MOUR
COI1MENT...... .EKI ST I NG CONDITI ONS
VOLUIIES GEOMETRY
EI 1/1 NB 51 EI 1/1 NI SI
L T 6& 7 80 8 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0
TM 4 2 415 270 TR 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0
RT 46 4 22 97 12.0 12.0 TR 12,0 TR 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 8,0 8.0
12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0
1985 MCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT
............................................................................
INTERSECTION, .VIA I4ONTEZUMA/FRONT ST.I JEFFERSOIi AVE.
AREA TYPE..... OT MER
ANALyST...... ,A.P.
DATE,..,..., ..09'05-1991
TI ME .. .. .. .. .. PM PEAK MOUR
COMMENT.. .. .. . EX I ST I MG CONO IT I ONS
VOLUMES GEOMETRY
E8 1/1 NB S8 EI WI N8 58
LT 120 38 80 6 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12,0
TM 6 I 612 604 TR 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0
RT 134 16 6 64 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0
RI 0 0 0 0 12,0 12.0 8.0 8,0
12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0
12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0
AOJUSrMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRAOE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PMF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV AD J PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE
(%) (l;) Y IN NIft Nt! Y IN min T (X) (%) Y IN Nil Nt! Y/N min T
EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25.8 3 E8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25.8 3
\J8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25.8 3 WI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 25.8 3
NI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 16.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 16.8 3
SI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 16.8 3 51 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 16.8 3
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 70.0
PH.l PH.2 PH.3 PH-4 PM'1 PH-2 PH.3 PH-4
EB L T X N8 LT X
TH X TH X
RT X RT X
PO X PO X
liB L T X 51 LT X
TH X TH X
RT X RT X
PO X PO X
GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 26.0 0,0 0.0
YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
..... ....................... .........-..... ............ ............................... .............. -_..........--. -..............
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. VIC GIC OELA Y LOS APP. DELA Y APP. LOS
EI L 0.132 0.386 10.6 B 9,9 I
TR 0.103 0.386 8.9 B
liB L TR 0.029 0.386 8.6 B 8.6 I
NB L 0.583 0.100 26.9 0 12,7 I
TR 0.415 0.386 10.3 I
51 L 0.058 0.100 21.7 C 10.2 B
TR 0.360 0,386 10.0 B
INTERSECTION:
Deley' , 1.4 (sec/veh) VIC. 0.334
LOS. B
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTM . 70.0
PH.l PM'2 PH-] PH'4 PH.l PH'2 PH-3 PH.4
E8 L T X NB LT X
TH X TH X
RT X RT X
PO X PO X
lIB LT X S8 L T X
TH X TH X
RT X RT X
PO X PO X
GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 GREEN 11.0 21.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY
E8 L 0.214 0.386 11.0 B 10,2
TR 0.262 0.386 9.5 B
lIB LTR 0.127 0.386 9.0 B 9.0
NI L 0.306 0.171 19.5 C 14.7
TR 0.644 0.314 14. I B
58 L 0.023 0,171 18.3 C 14.9
TR 0.706 0.314 14,9 B
APP. LOS
B
I
INTERSECTION:
Delay. 13.9 (sec/veh) V/C. 0.431
LOS . B
29
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY RE POR T
..........................................................................
INTERSECTION..MARGARITA RD./MORAGA RD.
AREA TYPE.....DTHER
ANAL TST . .... ..HS
DATE........ ..09.06-1991
Tl ME.. . .. .. .. . AM PEAl( HaJR
COHMENT.......EXISTING CONDITIONS
VOllotlES GEOMETRY
E8 lIB N8 S8 E8 lIB NI SI
L T 0 61 48 0 T 12.0 12,0 l 12.0 12.0
TH 46 106 0 0 R 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0
RT 97 0 30 0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.D 12.D 12.0
12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV AOJ PKG 8USES PHF PEDS PED, BUT. ARR. TTPE
(X) (X) TIN Nil Nb Y/N m;n T
ES 0.00 D.OO N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 11.3 3
liS 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 T 11.3 3
H8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 22.8 3
S8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 Y 22,8 3
~........................... -..-..-............-..... --.... -----..-.... --...... -- -. ..--.... .....- -.. -....-.... --... ....-
SIGNAL SETYINGS
PH-l PH-2 PH'3 PH.4
EI lT N8 lT
TH X TH
RT X RT
PD X PD
III l T X SI lT
TH X TH
RT RT
PD PO
GREEN 6.0 16.0 0,0 D.O GREEN
YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 TELlOW
CYCLE lENGTH. 70.0
PH-l PH.2 PH-3 PH.4
X
X
36.0
4.0
D,O
0.0
0.0
0.0
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY lOS APP, DELAT UP. LOS
E8 T 0.117 0.243 13.3 8 13,9 I
R 0.298 0.243 14.1 8
118 L 0.396 0.100 23,2 C 16,9 C
T 0,141 0.243 13.4 8
N8 l 0.061 0.529 6,1 8 5,7 I
R 0.041 0.529 5, I I
........................ --.......................... --............. ............- --.......... .._--.... ............. _....-.... --..
INTERSECTION:
OellY. 13.6 (see/vell) V/C. 0,119
LOS . I
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT
......-...................................................................
INTERSECTlON..MARGARITA RD./MORAGA RO,
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANAlTST...... .MS
DATE",.,.". .09-06-1991
TIME......... .PM PEAl( HOUR
CClHMENT. .. .. .. EX 1ST! NG COlID I TI ONS
E8
LT 0
TH 215
n 136
RR 0
VOl.lJIIES
\/I NI
75 192
165 0
o 125
o 0
SI
o T
o .
o
o
E8
12.0 L
12.0 T
lZ.0 T
lZ,O
12,0
lZ.0
GEOMETRY
\/I NI
12.D 12,0
12.0 12,0
12.0 12,0
12.0 12.0
12.0 12,0
lZ.0 12.0
SI
12,0
12,0
1Z.0
lZ.0
1Z.0
12.0
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USES PHF PEDS PED, BUT, ARR. TYPE
(X) (X) Y/N Nil Nb Y/N min T
EI 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 11.3 3
\/I 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 11.3 3
N8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 2Z.11 3
SI 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 T 2Z.8 3
."'- ................. -_...-.... ...... .......-...............-.... -.. ..................... ---.. --.............."'...- -- -.. --..
0.0
0.0
SIGNAL SETTINGS
PH-l PH-Z PH-3 PH-4
E8 LT N8 LT
TH X TH
RT X RT
PO X PO
\/I LT X S8 LT
TH X TH
RT IT
PO PO
GREEN 6,0 16.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN
TELlOW 4.0 4.D 0.0 0.0 YELLOII
CYCLE LENGTH. 70.0
PH-l PH-Z PH.3 PH-4
X
X
36.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
...... ..-.-.. ................... ....- ...................-................. ..-............................ -.....................
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. V/C G/C OELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP, LOS
EI T 0,546 0,243 15,9 C 15.5 C
R 0,418 0.243 14,8 8
\/I L 0.487 0.100 24.4 C 16.9 C
T O,2Z0 0,243 13.7 8
NI L O.Z71 0,529 6.9 8 6.4
. 0.172 0.529 5.5 I
INTERSECTION:
Deley. 12.7 (see/vell) V/C. 0.373
LOS . 8
32
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SIJI4MARY REPORT
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SU4MARY REPORT
..........................................................................
...............-..........................................................
INTERSECTION. .RANCHO VISTA RD./MARGARITA RD.
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANAL YST...... .A.P.
DATE........ ..09-05-1991
TIME.........."" PEAK HOUR
COMMENT.. .. .. . EX I ST I NG COND IT I CHS
INTERSECTION..RANCHO VISTA RD./MARGARITA RO.
AREA TYPE.....OTHER
ANALYST...... .A.P.
DATE...... .. ..09-05- 1991
TI ME .. .. . .. .. ,PM PEAK HOUR
COlMENT...... .EXISTING CONOITIONS
VOLIJI4ES GEOMETRY VOLtIlES GEOMETRY
EI \/I NI S8 EI \18 N8 SI E8 \18 N8 S8 E8 \18 N8 $I
L T 11 23 11 57 12.0 L 12,0 L 12.0 L 12.0 LT n 47 101 102 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0
TH 27 9 32 31 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TN 81 122 187 191 T 12,0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0
RT 2 28 17 22 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 47 141 32 127 R 12,0 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12,0 R 11.0 11.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PKG IUSES PHF PEDS PEO, IUT, ARR, TYPE
(Xl (Xl Y/N Nm Nb Y/N m;n T U;) (X) Y/N Nil Nb Y/N ",;n T
Ea 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 31.8 3 E8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 31.8 3
\/I 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 31.8 3 \18 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 31.8 3
NI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 NI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 Y 25.8 3
sa 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 SI 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3
~.......................................... -.................... --............................ --...... --.............. --.................... ...... ........... --......... ---- ....--.. --........ ...........................-.............- --.... -.. .....................-...............
S I GlIAL SET TI NGS CYCLE LENGTH . 80.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH . 80.0
PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH.4 PH-1 PH.2 PH-3 PH.4 PH-1 PH.2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4
EI L T X N8 LT X EI LT X N8 L T X
TH X TH X TN X TH X
RT X RT X RT X aT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
\/I LT X SI L T \18 LT X SI L T X
TH X TH X TH X TH X
RT X RT X RT X RT X
PO X PO X PO X PO X
GREEN 11.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 12.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN " .0 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 12.0 21.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOlI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOlI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOlI 4.0. 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOII 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
.. -..---- ----.......... ----..... ....--...---........---.................-...-... ------..-------..--... ... .............. --........ --.... --- ..............- -................... ...................... ..........................
LEVEL OF SERVICE LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. vie ClC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C ClC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS
EB L 0.048 0.150 22.1 C 16,4 C EI L 0.312 0.150 23.3 C 17.8 C
T 0.063 0.262 14.3 I T 0.190 0.262 14.8 8
R 0,006 0.262 14.1 I R 0.134 0.262 14.6 I
liB L 0.100 0,150 22.3 C 17.4 C \18 L 0.204 0.150 22,7 C 16.7 C
T 0.021 0,262 14.1 I T 0.287 0.262 15.3 C
R 0.080 0.262 14.4 I R 0.401 0.262 16.0 C
NI L 0.044 0.162 21.5 C 15,1 C NI L 0.408 0,162 23.4 C 17.2 C
T 0.038 0.275 13.7 I T 0,223 0.275 14.5 I
R 0.048 0_275 13.8 I R 0.091 0.275 13,9 a
51 L 0.230 0,162 22.2 C 18.1 C $I L 0,412 0.162 23.4 C 16.9 C
T 0.037 0.275 13.7 I T 0.227 0.275 14.5 I
R 0.062 0.275 13.8 8 R 0,359 0.275 15.3 C
................ ........ ...... ................... .... .................................... ............. .......... .......... .... .................... ........................ -........ -.......................... -.. ....... ...................
I NTERSECT ION: Deley . 17.0 (sec/vehl V/C . 0.106 LOS . C J NTERSECT ION: Delay' 17.1 (sec/vehl v/C . 0.374 LOS . C
36
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMART REPORT
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUNMAlT REPORT
.. .............. ........ .......... ... ... ..... .............................
..............-...........................................................
IN1ERSECTION. .PAUBA RD./TNEZ RD.
AREA TYPE.... .OTHER
ANAL TST...... .A.P,
DATE......... .09-05-1991
T I HE .. .. .. .. .. AM PEAK HClJR
CC>>94ENT.......EXISTING CONDITIONS
INTERUCTlON. .PAU8A RD./TNEZ RD.
AREA TYPE..... OT HER
ANALYST...... .A.P.
DATE......... .09'05- 1991
TI ME .. .. .. . . .. PM PEAK HCUR
CClMHT..,.. ..EXI ST I NCl CONDITIONS
VOLUMES ClEOMETRT VOLUMES GEOMETRY
EB 118 N8 SB E8 118 H8 S8 EI 118 NI SI EI 118 N8 SI
, T 0 36 0 32 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 12,0 LT 0 62 0 81 L 12.0 12,0 T 12.0 12.0
TH 0 0 186 208 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 TH 0 0 476 233 T 12.0 12,0 R 12.0 12.0
RT 0 54 18 0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12_0 RT 0 81 59 0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RR 0 0 0 0 12,0 12.0 8.0 8.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 8.0 a.o
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12_0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USES PHF PEOS PED_ BUT, AU. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PKCl 8USES PHF PEDS PED, BUT. ARR. TYPE
(:1;) (::) TIN Nm Nb TIN min T (:1;) C:U TIN N. Nb TIN min T
EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 19.3 3 EI 0.00 0.00 H 0 0 0.90 0 T 19.3 3
~8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 19,3 3 118 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 19.3 3
H8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 11.3 3 HI 0.00 0.00 H 0 0 0.90 0 T 11.3 3
SB 0.00 0,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 T 11.3 3 58 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 T 11.3 3
_ a.......... __................... .._.._.................. ""_,","""" ........ ___.. __............ .."'.. .____ ____ .......... ----.................... -.. --.. .............'" ...----.......- -...... .........-......................... -. --..... ---.. -.. -...... ......
SIGNAL SETTINGS CTCLE LEHGTH . 70.0 SIGNAL SETTINClS CTCLE LEHGTH . 70.0
PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH'1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH.4 PH'1 PH.2 PH-3 PH-4
E8 LT N8 LT EI LT H8 LT
TH TH X TN TN X
RT RT X RT RT X
PO PO X PO PO X
118 L T X S8 L T X 118 LT X 58 LT X
TH TN X TN TN X
RT RT X RT X RT X
PD PO X PO PO X
GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 16.0 16.0 0_0 0.0 GREEN 19.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 ClREEN 16.0 23.0 0.0 0.0
TEL,OII 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TELLClI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 TELLClI 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TELLClI 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
-........................-...................... ---................ --.. -.............. ----......... ---.......... -...... --......-.. --........................ -- ---.... -.............................. ....................................................
LEVEL OF SERVICE LEVEL OF SERV I CE
LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAT LOS APP, DELAT APP. LOS WE ClRP, VIC Cl/C DELAT LOS APP. DELAT APP. LOS
~B L 0.068 0.386 10,3 8 9.5 8 118 L 0.158 0.286 14.2 B 13.1 8
R 0.102 0.386 .8,9 8 R 0_224 0.286 12.4 8
NB T 0.473 0.243 15.2 C 15.0 8 NI T 0,851 0.343 20,1 C 19,5 C
R 0.054 0.243 13,1 8 R 0.1ZS 0.343 10.2 8
SB , 0.086 0.243 15.6 C 15,7 C SI L 0.235 0.243 16.2 C 12,9 8
T 0.529 0.243 15.7 C T 0.419 0.343 11.6 8
...................................................................... .............. .................... ............... ......................................... . ............ ........ ................ ........ ............. ...................................... ......; .................
INTERSECTION: Delay. 14,4 (aec:/vah) VIC . 0.201 LOS . 8 IHTERSECTlON: Dalay . 16.5 (Sac/veh) VIC . 0.476 LOS . C
Signal Warrant Worksheets
MI
.... '"
J,"
N o3NVl 3NO HIIM ~NIH~VOHddV 133HIS HONIr. v HO:j
..
3r.mO^ OlOHS3HHI H3M013HI SV S311ddV Hd^ Sl ONV S3NVl 3HOr. HO OMI HIIM
H~VOHddV 133H1S HONIr. v HO:j 3r.mO^ OlOHS3HHl H3MOl 3H1 SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 l :310N .
HdA-S:JH=>VOUddV HI08:10 lV10l-1:J3U1S uorvw
8LHS
leVl Doe OO~l DOll OOOl 006 009 DOL 009 009 0011' Doe
~ x- l
z I
I
l- I
::J: I
~ I OOl
-
...J x--- 1_____ ---- lU
0 x
i5
Z x
<( S; g :r:
C/) oo~
...J ! c: -
<( :r: ~
Z 3NYl l , 3NVl l ,: =
C) '1J -4
- OOC '1J :D
C/) :D m
o m
(J -- > ....
(1)0
- -z
u. I
LL <
<( Oov '1J
a: %
I- S3NVl 3uon uo ~ If S3NVl 3uon uo ~
III I:InOH }lV3d Wd
;:,
c: (S"3U" l"unu)
III
~ l.N"HU"M 3WnlO^ unOH )I"3d
to)
;;: O~'6 8Jn61:f
-
III
..
....
~I
J.~
CJ
Z
I-
:t
CJ
..J
C
Z
~
en
..J
~
Z
CJ
en
(.)
-
LL
LL
~
a:
I-
III
:J
C
III
~
U
;;:
-
III
...
....
:z:
Q
:z:
IIJ<
Co
irJ:
c: _
J: Z
(l)mo
1(1) ~ :
'V -i
~ ~
I~ m
o -i
:z:
I
<
'V
:z:
lU
::l
c:
lU
~
tJ
;;:
...
lU
...
....
CJ
Z
...
:I:
CJ
..J
o
Z
ct
en
..J
ct
Z
CJ
en
U
LL
LL
ct
a:
...
MI
... en
ch;
"3NVl 3NO HIIM ONIHOVOl:JddV 133l:J1S l:JONI~ V l:JO;:j
3~mO^ OlOHS3l:JHIl:J3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ CJl aNY S3NVl 3l:JO~ l:JO OMI HIIM
HOVOl:JddV 133l:J1S l:JONI~ V l:JO;:j 3~mO^ OlOHS3l:JHIl:J3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 ~ :310N :11-
HdA-S3H:lVOl:lddV Hl08:10 lVlOl-H31:1lS 1:I0rvw
avOYVlIYVOYVII
099
008~ OOl OO~ ~ OOO~ 006 009 OOl 009 009 OOt 008
I
I
I
:11- I
:11- oo~
J:
is
J:
<
OOl: ~ ~ 3:
I c -
I i~ g
I
3NVl ~ , 3NVl ~ . en
'V -4
I 008 'V ::II
--- - l::IIm
~OE o m
"C. -4
0
J:
J
<
00" 'V
J:
S3NVl 31:10W 1:10 l: , S3NVl 31:10... 1:10 l:
l:InOH >lY3d MId
(SV3~V 1V~n~)
~NV~~VM 3Wn10^ unOH )lV3d
OZ;-68mBI:I
<<l
::l
c:
<<l
::E
u
-
-
<<l
...
I-
CJ
Z
....
J:
CJ
-'
o
Z
<t
en
-'
<t
Z
CJ
en
(J
-
u..
u..
<t
a:
....
MI
9'"' en
ck;
.3NVl 3NO HI 1M DNIH:)VO~ddV 133~IS ~ONIr4 V ~O:f
3r4nlO^ OlOHS3~HI ~3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ Sl aNY S3NVl 3~OVi ~O OMI HIIM
H:)VO~ddV 133~IS ~ONIr4 V ~O:f 3r4nlO^ OlOHS3~HI ~3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 l :310N .
Hd^-S:lHOVOHddV H.10B:l0 lV.10.1-l:I:lH.1S Horvw
6l tiS
Olll
OOE:l OOl OOll OOOl 006 009 OOl 009 OOS 001>' OOE:
.
. 00
9Sl
OOC:
:lNVl l , :lNVl l
OOE:
oat>
S3NVl :lHOW HO ~ , S3NVl 3HOW HO ~
I:InOH >lV3d Wd
(SV3UV 1VUnU)
.lNVUUVM 3Wn10^ UnOH >lV3d
a~.6 8Jn81:1
:z:
i5
:z:
<
o i:
,.. -
c Z
Ti: 0
m :xl
..~ en
CII "U ....
i "U :xl
:xl m
o m
~ ....
o
:z:
I
<
"U
:z:
It!
~
c:
It!
~
U
~
-
It!
...
~
c.!'
Z
-
t-
:l:
c.!'
-
..oJ
o
Z
c:{
CIJ
..oJ
c:{
Z
c.!'
CIJ
(.)
-
u.
u.
c:{
a:
t-
M18
""'"'"
c:h~
'3NVl 3NO HIIM DNIH~VOl:lddV 1331:11S 1:I0NlVol V 1:10:1
3VolnlO^ 010HS31:1Hll:l3MOl 3Hl SV S3J1ddV Hd^ 9l ONV S3NVl 31:10VolI:I0 OMI HIIM
H~VOl:lddV 1331:11S 1:I0NlVol V 1:10.::1 3VolnlO^ 010HS31:1Hll:l3MOl 3Hl SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 l :310N .
HdA-S3HOVOYddV HIOO.::fO lVlOl-133Y1S yorvw
6LHS
OOE:l OOl OOll OOOl 006 9gB OOB OOl 009 OOg 0017 OOE:
.
. 00
OO~
3NVl ~ ., 3NVl ~
OOE:
17ze
0017
S3NVl 3YOW YO ~ ., S3NVl 3YOW YO ~
UnOH }lV3d Mid
(SV3HV 1VMnH)
J.NVHHVM 3Wn10^ MnOH )fV3d
01;-68Jn61.:f
::r
i5
::r
<
o i:
r- _
c: z
T I: 0
... m ::u
CIl ~ en
(I) 'V ~
_ 'V ::u
-:::u m
o m
~ ~
o
::r
I
<
'V
::r
~
;:,
c
~
~
(,)
~
-
~
...
I-
CJ
Z
-
....
J:
CJ
..J
o
Z
<{
en
..J
<{
Z
CJ
en
(.)
u.
u.
<{
a:
....
~=
J,;
"3NV1 3NO Hl.lM 8NIH:JVOHddV l.33Hl.S HONI~ V HO~
3~mO^ 010HS3HHl. H3M013Hl. SV S311ddV Hd^ 9l ONV S3NVl 3HO~ HO OMl. Hl.lM
HOVOHddV l.33H1S HONI~ V HO~ 3~nl0^ Q10HS3HHl. H3MOl 3Hl. SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 l :31.0N ".
Hd^-S3HOVOYddV H.108::f0 lV.10.1-.133Y.1S YOrVN
8LYS
9LH
OOE:l OOll 00 OOOl 006 009 DOL 009 OOg 00., ODE:
~
I
I
I
". i
". If 00
I :;
I Ii)
I %
I <
.. oo~ 0
J r- ~
I c: -
z
I !; J: 0
I m :II
I ~ ,. 0
X ~8~ '1J -4
'1J :II
OOE: :II m
o m
,. -4
0
%
I
<
00., '1J
%
S3NVl 3UON UO Z , S3NVl 3UOW UO Z
I:InOH >lV3d Wd
(SV3IHf lVHnU)
~NVHHVM 3Wnl0^ HnOH )lV3d
01:-68Jn61:f
III
:;,
c:
III
:E
.~
...
...
III
...
t-
CJ
Z
-
....
:z:
~
...J
C
Z
<(
(J)
...J
<(
Z
~
-
en
u
u.
u.
ct
a:
....
MI
PO",
J,~
"3NVl 3NO HIIM ONIH~VOl::lddV 1331::11S I::IONI~ V I::IO~
3~mO^ 0l0HS31::1HIl::l3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ Sl ONV S3NVl 31::10~ 1::10 OMI HI 1M
H~VOl::lddV 1331::11S I::IONI~ V I::IO~ 3~mO^ 0l0HS31::1Hll::l3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 ~ :310N .
Hd^-S3H:lVOUddV HI08:f0 lVlOl-133U1S uorvw
OVOH Y31S3H:>NIM
OOC ~ 19U OOl ~ 00 OOO~ 006 008 OOl 009 009 00... OOC
X
I
I
I
. I
I ~
. 00
I
X--- ---- SCl :t
i5
:t
<
OO~ Z ~ J:
a c: -
J: Z
~ m ~
3NVl l ., 3NVl J. en ~ fI)
~ :g ~
OOC ~:D:D
o m
,. ~
(')
:t
I
<
00... 'V
:t
S3NVl 3UOW UO ~ ., S3NVl 3UOW UO ~
l:InOH >lY3d Wd
(SY3UY'YUnu)
.lNYHU"M 3Wn10^ unOH >lY3d
a~-6 eJn61.~
Traffic Manual
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
9-13
12-1986
. . 0
0
C")
r
0 u w
0 e( ~
C\I a ::l
a: ....J
a. ~
a.
e(
l- e
w ....J
0 a
0 w
.... a: r
.... I- CI)
CI) w
a: a:
r
:J: a I-
z
.... w 0 Q. ~ a:
> w
Z 0 ;:
Z oC 0 I <(
< ....J U) a: a
w ....J
a: .... :J: ~ W
a: ell (.) r
w oC W I- u.i
~-a: w z 0 0 ~ CI)
z oC 0 I: ::l <( Z
C/J:;) ....J 0) Q. ....J <(
oC Q. a CI) ....J
w< 0 U) ....J oC > w w
C w .... ::::i Z
:E~ X Z :J: e a.
N oC ell ~ ....J a. a
~ ::) < ~ ....J U) ~g a <( r
! w w 0 r r I-
..J ..J 11II( a: z 0 Ou.. CI) ~
w a.
~ 0< W 0 oC co 11:0 >
Cl ....J a:
ii: >a:Q. ~ ::5"'" r 10 C)
I: W i!g I- ,... Z
a:::)~ I: r
0 0 . a: e
::)a: ~ C") w z u
(It 0"" ~ ;: <(
O-Q. ell I: I <( a
0 0 ~ a CI) a:
J: U) ,... W ....J W a.
w (It w w z a.
~ z I: r <( <(
II( oC ~ I- ....J I-
....J U) CI) w w
W W I: e( a: w
Q. I: 0 0 a a:
0 0 CI)
co .., w ~ I-
~ C CI)
~ ::::i a: a:
I: a. a
0 a. a
<( a z
(It ;: ~
0 r
a. l- e(
0 > r
10 0 I- a:
0 ~ a
u..
w
0 I-
a
0 z
.
.
0
0
C")
0 0 0 .... 0
0 0 0 10 0
. C") (\oj ....
NOAHY:> MOBNIYH
Hd^-HOVOYddV 3Wn10^ HDIH
133Y1S YONIW
~I
~~
CJ
Z
~
::I:
CJ
-
..J
C
Z
<!
rn
..J
<!
Z
CJ
rn
u
-
LL
LL
<!
a:
~
co
:l
c:
co
~
(J
;;:
....
co
...
~
.
.
unOH >lV3d Mid
(SV3HV NVBHn)
.lNVHHVM 3Wn10^ HnOH >lV3d
:)~.6 8Jn8':I
S3NVl 3YOW YO Z, S3NVl 3YOW YO Z
I
3NVl
3NVl
~
~
009
00\1
009
OOE
00
sea.
OOl
z
is
z
<
o
IE J:
J: -
m ~
~U)~ ~
'1J -i
::D ::D
o m
,. m
o -i
Z
I
<
'1J
Z
OOg
OOE
OOl
OOll
000
toS8
006 008
001
009
OOg
00\1
008
001
009
OO~
Hd^-S3HOVOYddV H10B:f0 lV101-133Y1S YOrVW
J.33H.LS .1NOH:I
"3NVl 3NO HIIM DNIH:JVOl::JddV 133l::J1S l::JONI~ V l::JO:l
3~mO^ 010HS3l::JHll::J3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 l ONV S3NVl 3l::JO~ l::JO OMI HIIM
H:JVOl::JddV 133l::J1S l::JONI~ V l::JO:l 3~mo^ 010HS3l::JHIl::J3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ Og l
:310N .
III
::l
c:
III
~
.~
....
....
III
...
....
C)
z
~
J:
C)
..J
o
z
<t
en
..J
<t
z
C)
en
(.J
u.
u.
<t
ex:
~
MI
.- en
rA;
03NVl 3NO HIIM ~NIH:)VO~ddV 133~IS ~ONI~ V ~O:l
3~mO^ 010HS3~HI ~3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ 9L aNY S3NVl 3~O~ ~O OMI HIIM
H:)VO~ddV 133~IS ~ONI~ V ~O:l 3~mO^ 010HS3~HI ~3MOl 3Hl SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 ~ :3I0N .
HdA-S3HOVOHddV HI0S:l0 lY101-133HIS HOryW
3nN3AY NOSH3:I:l3r
6!a OOC~ DOl OO~ ~ OOO~ 006 008 DOL 009 DOg 0011' DOC
x- -
.
I
I
I
I .
I . 00
I
I
x---- "9~
OOZ
3NVl ~ If 3NYl ~
DOC
3NYl ~ If S3NYl 3HOW HO ~
DOt
S3NYl 3HOW HO ~ If S3NVl 3HOW HO ~
I:InOH >lV3d Mid
(S"3~V lV~n~)
.LNV~~"M 3Wnl0^ ~nOH )lV3d
a~-6 8Jn61:1
:r
i5
:r
<
~~ ~
::uC z
i~ 0
m ::u
:. en
lo:g if
::u m
o m
:. ...
o
:r
I
<
~
:r
MI
-en
ck;l; '3NVl 3NO HllM ~NIH:JVOl::lddV 1331::11S I::IONI~ V I::IO.:J
-
3....mO^ 010HS31::1H11::l3MOl 3H1 SV S311ddV Hd^ 9L ONV S3NVl 31::10~ 1::10 OMl H1IM
H:JVOl::lddV 1331::11S I::IONI~ V I::IO.:J 3~mO^ 010HS31::1Hl1::13MOl 3Hl SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 l :310N ".
HdA-S3HOVOUddV H10B::I0 1V101-133U1S UOfV...
OYOH SONII:IdS ~OH Y.L3R1HflIll
009l OOC DOll DOll OOOl 006 009 DOL 009 DOg 00i' DOC
" x~~
Z
t-
J:
" 00
..J
0 :r
is
Z :r
<( <
en - OO~ ~ J:
c -
..J T J: Z
< Nm 0
Z .. :II
3NVl ~ , 3NV1 ~ (II:' tn
" l:g -f
- - DOC :II :II
en o m
() ,. -f
0
:r
LL x----- ----- ---- ----- 99E I
LL <
<( 00i' 'V
a: :r
t- S3NV1 31:10... UO ~ , S3NV1 3UO'" 1:10 ~
ftI
::l
c: (SV3UV'VUnu)
co
:E .lNVHHVM 3Wn,O^ HnOH >lV3d
u
- OZ:-68Jn61:1
-
co
...
I-
III
:J
c:
III
:E
.~
-
-
III
~
I-
CJ
Z
~
:I:
CJ
..J
o
Z
~
en
..J
~
Z
CJ
en
o
-
LL
LL
~
a::
I-
MI
.... en
ch;
'3NVl 3NO HIIM DNIH~VOHddV 133H1S HONIv-l V HO:!
3r4nlO^ OlOHS3HHI H3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ Sl ONV S3NVl 3HOv-l HO OMI HIIM ..
H:)VOUddV 133UlS UONIv-l V UO.:.l 3r4nlO^ OlOHS3UHI U3MOl 3HI SV S311ddV Hd^ 00 310N .
Hd^-S3HOVOHddV HI0S.:f0 lVI01-133HIS HOrV'"
avoy S9NR1dS .100 Y.13IYYnW
BlO~
OOC~ OOl OO~ ~ OOO~ 006 009 OOl 009 OOS 00l>' OOC
.
I
I
.
. 00
:r
Q
:r
<
OOC: g i:
Ou _ c: Z
I :I: 0
~ m :D
3NVl ~ , 3NVl ~ CII )00 en
i:g -4
OOC :D :D
o m
)00 -4
0
:r
I
<
00l>' "tl
:r
S3NVl 3UO... UO ~ , S3NVl 3UO... HO ~
(SV3IH11VUnU)
.lNVt:Jt:JVM 3Wnl0^ l:InOH >lV3d
()~'6 8Jn61.:1
(
Q
I~.
.~,....,.=,..'
;.
fa
~
(
..
1;
J
.1
!I,~i
,.,.1, il.,.!~ ...
~I r~
...
~
...
I
o
(
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
A. Introduction
The Vision Statement for the City of Temecula is an active approach to shaping the dynamics
of change and establishing clear direction for the preparation of the General Plan for the City,
This is a complex and challenging task, General Plans frequently fail in this regard because of
a singularly physical orientation, complexity and detachment from the real process of decision-
making, While the effort to prepare and adopt a General Plan is challenging the real test of
effectiveness is to carry out the policies and the recommendations of the Plan after it is adopted,
The General Plan for Temecula is intended to be a working policy document that represents the
cumulative desires of the City's residents with regard to how the community should grow and
develop and what it should become in the future,
Given this planning context, a statement of the most important dimensions of community
character to be preserved or achieved as development occurs is essential. That is what is called
Community Vision, This Vision Statement provides a way of viewing those ideas and values
concepts that will eventually be incorporated into the various General Plan Elements. Its thrust
draws upon the Mission Statement already established by the City Council. This Vision
Statement focuses portions of the Mission Statement related to the City's physical development
into a framework for the General Plan Elements,
B. The Mission Statement
The Mission Statement for the City has previously been approved by the City Council. This
statement provides positive direction for the preparation of the General Plan:
· The mission of the City of Temecula is to maintain a safe, clean, healthy and
orderly community, the balance the utilization of open space, parks, trail facilities,
quality jobs, public transportation, diverse housing and adequate infrastructure and
to enhance and revitalize historic areas,
· The City will encourage programs for all age groups, utilize its human resources,
preserve its natural resources while stimulating technology, promoting commerce
and utilizing sound fiscal policy,
· It is the City Council's resolve that this mission will instill a sense of pride and
accomplishment in its citizens and that the City will be known as a progressive,
innovative, balanced and environmentally sensitive community,
1
VISION STATEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
c. A Summary for the Vision for Temecula
The Vision for Temecula is intended to represent the values of the community that will contribute
to the future image and physical character of the community, The concepts and values presented
within this vision statement provide the overall direction for the preparation of the Goals and
Policies that will be an integral part of the General Plan Elements, Based upon the values
identifies the following represents a summary of the key concepts of the Community Vision for
the City of Temecula:
.
A Balance of Residential, Commercial and Industrial Opportunities
.
Retail and business development within multiple commercial centers-not necessarily
within a single Central Business District.
.
A convenient and effective transportation system which includes vehicular circulation, air,
rail, bicycles and pedestrian modes of travel.
.
An outstanding open space and parks system;
.
A community dedicated to preserving family values, neighborhood conservation and
public safety,
.
Opportunities for community activities for a wide array of interests, ages and lifestyles.
.
Preservation and enhancement of historical and cultural resources within the community--
.
Assurances that adequate public services are provided concurrently with development.
2
VISION STATEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
D. Purpose of the Vision Statement
The purpose of this Vision Statement is to declare a commitment to a quality of living that
substantially exceeds what would otherwise occur, It provides a foundation for the Temecula
General Plan and provides a mental picture of the future image and character of the City, It will
enable future community leaders and citizens to recall and endorse the meaning of the Plan and
maintain diligence in carrying out its intent.
Many people will play a role in achieving this Vision. It will take many years; yet, each new
year is an important step in the right direction, How can those who inherit community
responsibilities many years from now know what was envisioned by this effort? How can they
understand what values and priorities drove the deliberations which resulted in the Plan after time
and change cause memories to fade?
The Vision may well include certain existing characteristics to be preserved, as well as those yet
to be achieved, It is imaginative in that it envisions conditions that may not now exist. It
anticipates the results of numerous future events and actions,
It is practical in that it requires specific actions to be taken and must have continuing support by
community leaders and opinion makers, This can occur only if the Vision reinforces community
values that can be sustained over a long period of time,
E. The Dimensions of Community Vision
A Community Vision of the future can be visualized from six perspectives, These are simply
different ways to think about the community, It includes the community viewed as:
.
A physical place;
An economic system;
An environmental system;
A society;
A governmental jurisdiction; and
A symbol.
.
.
.
.
.
For each of these dimensions, the Vision Statement consists of a description of important
community values to be respected in the General Plan, Each dimension will be is addressed in
some manner in appropriate elements of the General Plan,
These perspectives can be defined and described in the following ways:
3
VISION STATEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
A Phvsical Place. This dimension includes the physical setting in which the community is
located and is defined by the way the community functions and appears physically, This is what
you see on the ground. Major ingredients include: topography; pattern of development; variety,
intensity and mix of land uses; pattern and quality of permanent open space; coherence of
development patterns; quality of man made features and structures; and physical distinctiveness
in relation to the surrounding area and other communities,
· A high quality community;
· A comfortable and safe place in which to raise a family;
· Adequate public facilities and services;
· A positive aesthetic image;
· Base of Movement on an improved citywide and regional transportation system;
· Management of physical development so that the unique community character is
preserved and enhanced;
· Well designed and maintained open space areas;
· An effective public transportation system and improved pedestrian circulation;
· Adequate and well designed park and recreation areas;
· A variety of housing types and opportunities with special attention to the design
standards and quality of higher density and multiple family development.
An Economic System, This dimension has to do with the flow of private capital and financial
investment in the form of cash, credit, land improvements, employment and business activities
of all kinds. It incudes the amount and quality (dependability) of capital flowing through the
community (in to it and out of it), as well as within it. An important dimension of the economic
character of the community is the degree of diversity in work opportunities for residents of all
economic conditions who live there, The most important community values related to economic
vision include:
· Expanded commercial and industrial development with a diversity of services,
products and markets rather than dependence on a narrow economic base;
· Achieving new sources of City revenue through enhancement, intensification and
revitalization of land uses;
· The maintenance and development of high quality commercial centers and
business parks to foster economic opportunities within the City;
4
VISION STATEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
· A solid economic base to support quality of life and afford the provision of
adequate levels of service for all residents;
· Revitalization of the Old Town Area as a continued community asset to provide
a specialty district for tourism and other economic development activities;
· Maintenance and enhancement of the commercial and industrial land uses located
in the western area of the City;
· Development of the area as a destination vacation community, but without tourism
dominating the community.
An Environmental System. This dimension of Vision involves the combination and diversity
of natural and man made features as an interactive system, This includes such ingredients as air
quality; water quality; flood protection; environmentally sensitive resources; plant and animal life;
and the degree to which system balance is maintained or lost. A critical aspect of the
environmental system is the maintenance of diversity and balance within the total system, giving
it the resilience to respond to changing conditions,
.
The preservation of natural resources ensures long-term productivity of the
environment.
.
Residents of Temecula take great pride in their high quality environment.
.
Residents have concern for the local and regional environment.
.
It is important to the City that development is sensitive to the environment and
open space needs of residents,
.
Careful integration of the open space system into the fabric of the community is
a desirable quality,
A Society. This dimension addresses the people in the community and how they live and
interact. It includes the nature and extent of population diversity; the vocational, educational,
cultural and recreational activities in which they engage; the institutions that they establish and
the patterns of relationships that they seek, Of particular significance is the way in which diverse
interests in the community find ways to express their individuality and still function cooperatively
as a community,
.
It is important to the City to promote greater civic identity and community pride,
.
High quality education is a priority for City residents,
.
Parks and quality recreational programs are very important to residents,
5
VISION STATEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
· Providing opportunities for increased social interaction is important for City
residents,
· Preserving and enhancing the environment is an important value in the City,
· Providing a variety of recreational and educational programs is important to all
ages especially the youth and the senior citizens,
· Providing a safe, secure and orderly community,
Government. The governmental dimension is responsible for many functions under the state
law, carried out under local leadership and with priorities determined locally, Much of our
perception of community is shaped by local governments because they are closest to the people
and carry prescribed authority for matters of day to day importance to us,
This dimension includes such functional responsibilities as: raising public revenues; budgeting;
managing public properties; maintaining levels of service; establishing public policy; managing
growth and development; providing public facilities and services; maintaining cooperative
relationships with other units of government; providing community leadership; and maintaining
responsiveness to the citizenry, Local government is the level of government in California which
has the authority to guide and regulate land use,
.
Achieving the City's interests is well-served by local/regional coordination and
cooperation,
.
It is essential and desirable to maintain active communication between City
government and the citizenry, particularly during early years of Cityhood,
.
It is important that government is successful in balancing the various interests in
. the Community and yet is sensitive to the needs of the individual citizen,
.
It is important for Temecula to establish its own governmental structure and style,
A Symbol. To some degree, this is the sum of all the other dimensions of community, It is a
relatively simple representation of what people think about their community - the image reflecting
their overall Vision of the place, It is a measure of pride and commitment; a belief that this is
a special place, It also includes a strong measure of reputation: how the community is perceived
by those who don't live or work there, To a degree, the community as a symbol reflects its
function in the region (regional center; residential suburb; new town; farm town; tourist
destination; etc,), The symbol can be a powerful force in stimulating leadership and support for
community achievement, much as a flag elicits feelings of patriotism, It can be aided, but not
created, by physical improvements which are consistent with a desired image,
· The City symbolizes quality southern California lifestyle,
6
VISION STATEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
· Temecula has the potential for many open space areas and recreational facilities
in the City,
· Temecula values the fact that it is a family-oriented community,
· Temecula is a Community where a high quality of life is maintained and
promoted,
· A strong sense of community involvement and volunteerism,
· A commitment to preservation of the City's historic roots,
TEM-Ol \TMVISION.REV
7
VISION STATEMENT
~~
~-o
!rlE
PLANNING
CENTER
~oo :: :,' /= STRc=;
J:t . :=
'='~J,/P'~ ':T 3E,~.C~ ::=,; 92c60
-'J~ ~':--~~
. ~iCJr.nl~,g j. Researcn
.= = :-:-CL:rer Se~, 'ces & G,S
. =~':'.;,:;",Tp.nrc, S:L:ClleS
. 00'_. 2';~T,8r,rc: ::oeNlces
:( ,:.Je':c" t='lann!rg
· Lanascace Arcn,tecture
. ~escurce Mancgemenr
. 'Jrbcr, L'':OSlqn
ffices 'n
, '/0 '':)ort Beacn CA.
rst'eld. CA
-8S0erra Ci\
~crcmento l:.\
.' no en IX AZ
.Jcson, Ai
MEMORANDUM
Date.
9/9/91
To,
Gary Thornhill and John Meyer
Karc:1 Gulley fb
From,
Subject:
Gencral Plan Issues Summar~'
j:.~ rcque~td, we havc organized the issues and opponunitics identified during
~::c :-\eighLurhood lvkctings and the interviews \vilh individual City Council and
Pbnnin[! Commis:.ion members. Durin!.:: the scries of feur :~cil!hb8rhood
~ ~ -
\ieetings there were nearly 300 issues rai~t:d by citizens <!Dei lanoowners. The
PlannIng Commission and City Council intcr,'iews also gener~ted a significant
::umbcr of issues ami concerns to be addressed in the General Plan.
The attached Issues Summary provides a detCliied listing of all the issues and
opportunities raised to date, The purpose of the Issues Summary is to provide a
ioundation for developing the goals. policies and implementation measures for
the General Plan, It is an important source of information on community values
and ideas concerning growth and development. that will be used in conjunction
with other appropriate sources of information (e.g. the Southwest Area Plan and
the City Council's Mission Statement),
The Issues Summary contains the "raw data" from meetings and interviews,
which has been organized by key subject areas, Those issues that relate to more
than one subject area are repeated under each of the appropriate subject
headings. Each issue is also assigned to a General Plan element(s). You will
note that several issues conflict with one another. Some issues should be
addressed through other plans or programs of City government. We will son
through and refine the issues as we begin to develop policies for the General
Plan.
The following is a highlight of what can be considered the "major issues" - the
issues that were raised numerous times and/or the issues that were generally
agreed upon as being a high priority for the City.
City Government:
Need for better enforcement of grading standards and building codes
.
Need better slope. maintenance
.
Improve maintenance of existing roads
1
Community Design:
· Need for expansion of Old Town and special design/development
standards
· Ensure quality development through the design review process
· Need for standards related to building mass or bulk of structures
· Preserve and enhance Old Town
· Need higher quality commercial development (architecture, site planning,
landscape, pedestrian access)
· Maintain small town atmosphere and rural/country character
· Need for pedestrian-oriented commercial centers
· Preserve history of Temecula (original Stage Stop area, etc,)
· Need rural development standards and establish rural residential districts
Economic Development:
.
Encourage tourism related to wineries, Old Town, other historic sites, etc,
.
Need for more cultural activities and facilities (amphitheatre, conventi6n
center)
.
Lack of employment opportunities - need for jobs/housing balance
.
More Industrial Development - want clean industry, higher paying jobs
.
Preserve hillsides - particularly the western ridgeline
Open Space/Recreation:
.
Provide recreation opportunities along Temecula Creek - do not
channelize with concrete
.
Need for permanent location for regional recreation events
.
Lack of i-arkland for active recreational use - need for neighborhood and'~
communi~y level parks
2
· Potential to share community facilities with Murrieta, Lake Elsinore and
Wildomar
· Better distribution of local/neighborhood parks throughout the community
· Bike paths should function as an alternative to car travel, not just as
recreation - provide bike paths on all arterials and collectors
· Need for additional pedestrian paths linking neighborhoods to commercial
development and parks
Land Use:
· Concern about impacts from possible airport expansion - noise, safety,
traffic circulation, land use conflicts
· Need for transition between residential densities - or adequate buffering
· No residential around French Valley Airport - only commercial/industrial
appropriate
· Need to disperse high density residential uses
Housing:
· Plan for a range of residential densities - need better mix
· Need for creative design solutions to implement high density housing or
mixed used (retail and housing)
Growth Management:
· Important to manage growth - properly phase infrastructure/services,
manage water supply
· Require road and other infrastructure/service improvements prior to or
concurrent with new development
Public Safety/Services:
.
Concern about potential flood hazards - ensure adequate storm runoff
control
3
· Need adequate number of fire stations to serve development - need
station east side of town
· Improve regional coordination for road improvements, flood control,
water, schools, open space/park acquisition
· Minimize school/traffic conflicts (improve safety of children walking)
· Concern about impact of high density housing on schools, other
infrastructure/services
Circulation:
· Need circulation improvements and more parking in Old Town
· Need more freeway overpasses and widening of existing overpasses
· Reduce the use of local streets being used by through traffic (ex, Calle
Medusa)
· Need synchronization of traffic lights
· Inconsistent street right-of-way development - safety issue
· Restrict truck traffic through town - identify alternative truck routes
TEM-Ol\lSSUESUM.MEM
4
B~UV pafqns AU: A.nnuwns sansSJ
WB.I~O.ld UBld IlUauao
VIIl;):iW3:J. ~O AJ.I;)
we€Z:OI
16/90/60
eln:J~w~.LJo AI!:)
-
-
U~!S:la AHunwwo;).
-
U~!S:la AHunwwo;).
-
U~!S:la Al!Unwwo;)
uOHUln:>JK)'
-
U~!S:la Al!Unwwo;),
-
luawam dD
-
Ul?ld UOHl?IU:>W:>ldwI'
-
U~!s:>a Al!Unwwo;),
-
Ul?ld UOHl?IU:lW:>ldwI'
-
U~!s:>a Al!Unwwo;).
-
S:l:>!AJ:>s/s:>!lm:>l?,i :>!Iqnd
Ul?ld UOHl?IU:>W:>ldwI'
S:l:>!AJ:>S/s:>!l!I!:>l?,i o!(qnd
Ul?ld uO!lmu:>w:>ldwI'
Ul?ld UO!ll?IU:>W:>ldwI
lu:>wdol:>A:>a o!WoUO:>3'
Ul?ld UOHl?IU:>W:>ldwI'
luawam dD
lualUu.l;}A~
Al!;)
S:l:>Ul?U!pJO/S:>PO:> 2u!peJ2 JO lU:>W:l:>JOJU:> J:>n:>q JOJ P:>:>N
I
lu:>w:>dol:>A:>P JO spl?dw! :>A!1l?lnwn:> :>lp uo UOpmIlJoJU! p:>ll?pdn P:>:>N
z
2upUl?ug lU:lW:>AOJdw!
SlU:>W:>AOJdw! p:>sodOJd PUl? lSl?d :>J Uh\O.L PIO U! SlU:>p!S:>J 01 Al!A!l!SU:>S JO :){:>l!"]
:>nqnd JO 2U!z!2:>Il?.QS (OJ:>.rn:J
(
v
.
SJ:>h\Od lU:>W:l:>JOJU:l qHh\ pmoa A\:>!A:>lI u2!s:>a l? qsnqmsg:
~
.
lu:>wdol:>A:>P p:>sodoJd JO 2uppou o!lqnd J:>n:>q 10J P:>:>N 9
:>:>U!WWo;) uO!l~g!lnl?:>a AIOS!APV 10J P:>:lN
L
.
lU:>mw:>A02 AlP 01 SUOSl?!I :>q p(Ooqs
SUO!ll?pOSsy SJ:>UA\o:>woH
8
.Ial;)B.lBq;) Al!UnWWO;)
S:Jll!l<J<JJV poo'lJoq'l:JFJN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
spJl?pUl?IS lu:>wdoI:>A:>p/U8!s:>p Il?p:>ds pUl? UA\O.L PIO JO uo!sul?dx:> JOJ P:>:>N
SPl?OllOfl?W uo SAl?hU(Jl?d p:>dl?:>sPUl?I 10J P:>:>N
z
1
SS:>:>OJd IU:>wdol:>A:>P :>ql
p~ l?!llioJ!I1O oqOUl?lI uo S:>;Ul :>lOWl?:>AS :>A.J:>S:>Jd
J~lU~
q8nonn SJoP!llO:> Ilm~^ :>A.J:>S:>Jd
f
v
.
RUluueld ~q.L
gln:>:}w~.L JO hID
-
-
:)s n PUl!j.
-
u8!s:)Q ,{1!unww<o,
-
:)Sn PUl!j
u8!s:)Q ,{l!Unww<o.
-
u8!s:)Q ,{l!Unww<o.
-
S:xl!A!:)S/S:)!lH!:lR.:I :l!lqnd
u8!s:)Q ,{1!unww<o.
:)s n PUl!j
URId UO!lR1U:)W:)ldwI
u8!s:)Q A1!unww<o.
:)sn pUl!j
lu:)wdoI:)A:)Q :l!wouoo3.
u8!s:)Q A1!Unww<o.
:)sn pUl!j,
u8!s:)Q A1!Unww<o.
lU~W~m d~
( J~IU~ ~U!UUgld ~q.L
-
-
S8,,!13<JJf POOIJ.loqr{8?<JN ]V p<J]V<JdCJN
sp.rn,{:)U!^/AllUnO:l :)U!i\\ :)A!:)s:)Jd SZ .
-
S8,,!13CJJf POOIJ.loqr{8?CJN IV pCJ]vCJdCJN
A.r:)u:Y.U8 :)JOW 'A1P]0 :)8RW! Pl!nq - Rln:l:)w:)~ JOJ URId :xfe:>SPURI J:)lSRW R dOI:)A:)Q PZ .
S8,,!13<JJf POOIJ.loqr{8?<JN IV pCJlvCJdCJN
J:)PRJRq:l A.rlUnOO/llllnJ pUR :)J:)qdSOW1R Ui\\Ol nRWS U!RlU!RW EZ .
S8,,!13CJJf POOIJ.loqr{8?CJN IV pCJlvCJd<JN
SlU:)P!S:)J :)WH-SuOI q1!i\\ SJ:)WOOi\\:)U :)11ll8:)lUI ZZ .
se:>.rn Il?PJ:)wwOO 1I! S){IRi\\:)P!S snonunuoo JO )f:ll!j lZ .
Al:)!lRA P:):)U - SJ:)lU:xlIRpJ:)WWOO JO uo!pUtlJ/U8!S:)p :)A!lR:)J:> :)SRmO:lU3 OZ .
s:)!l!unuoddo :)z!wprnw - Ui\\O~ PIO u! s:lsn IRPJ:)WWO:l JO Al!l!lmb pUR :)dA~ 61 .
-
Su!de:>spUl?1 J:)U:JQ :)Se.mOOU:) 01 WlllSOJd ~Jl :):)J.:I 81 .
SllRW-!U!W :)Jow JO lu:)wdol:)A:)P P!llS:)~ L 1 .
S8,,!13CJJfPOOIJ.loqr{8?<JN IV pCJlvCJdCJN
(Ss:l:>:>l? UR!lls:lP:xf ':xfe:>SPURI 'SU!UURId :)1!s ':)JOl:Y.ll!l1:>JR) lU:)wdol:)A:)P {l?pJ:)WWO:l AmRnb l:)qS!q P:):)N 91 .
J~ptueq:.J Al!Unwwo:.J
e~.IV l;)~fqns A9: AJBlUWnS s~nsSJ WB(Z:OI 16/90/60
wro3oJd ueld ltu~u~~
VI03ffi\I3:.L.!IO A.LI3
eln:Jgwg~ 10 f ",
-
-
1U:)wdol:'M:)a :>!WOUOO3'
-
:)Sn Ptm'l
1u:)wdol:)^~a :>!WOUOO3,
-
~Sn pUeJ
1u;}wdol~^:>a :>!WOUOO3'
-
1u:>wdol~Ma :>!WOUOO3,
-
lU3W3m d~
-
uS!S~a ^I!unwwo;),
-
UOneAJ:>su<o w :r.>eds u~a
:)Sn pUeJ'
~Sn pUeJ
uS!S~a ^1!unwwo;).
uS!S~a ^1!unwwo;),
~Sn pUeJ'
lU3W313: d~
jglV ~u~uneld ;)41-
----'
-
S3U[J;);1W poo'l.JOQ'l3!;1N IV p;nv;}d<J~
':>1:) 's:l1!S :>!l01S!q J:)Q10 'Uh\O~ Pia 'S:)!l:)U!M 01 p:)lel:)J WS!lfl01 :>Se.m0:>U3 17 .
Uo!8:>J 1I! puelle!llsnpuUI~PJ:>WWO:> 10J puew:)p :>lll1dlP 01 ^1!unuodda E .
S:)!l!unuoddo :)z!w!xew - Uh\O~ Pia U! ~sn lep1:)wwo:>)0 A1menb pue ~dA~ Z .
eln:>:)w~~)O tr.ue W:>Q1nos U! IUPU:)tod 1u:)wdol:)A:)P :>!WOUOO:) )0 UO!1tmle^3 1 .
lU3WdOI3A3(1 ;)!WOUO;)3:
S3U[J;);1W poo'lJoq'l3!;1N IV p<Jlv<Jd<J~
(':>1:) 'troue d01S ~8etS l~u!8!l0) epl:Y.}w~~)O AJ01S!Q :)AJ:>s:)Jd Of .
:Y.>m~t.JOdw! IlP!lOIS!Q)O SR:>le )0 uO!1ex~uuv 6Z .
u8!~p ^l!unwwoo pue :>sn puel OIU! e:).Ie )0 AJ01S!Q :)1&18:)1UI 8Z .
S3U[J;);1W pOOf{Joqt{3!<JN IV p<JlrJ;}d<J~
SJ:)tU:Y.> lepJ:>wwoo P:)lu:>!lO-Ue!lls:)p:)d S{Y.):)U An::> LZ .
S3U[J;);1JV pOOf{.Ioq'l3!<JN IV p<JIV;1d<J~
SJ:)IU:):> IUpJ:>WWOO d!l1s Hews 1u~wdol:>MP :)8&1noos!a 9Z .
.I3plUUq3 Alfunwwo3
U3.1V p3fqnS All A.lmuwnS s3nsSJ: weEZ:OI 16/90/60
WlUSO.ld uUld IlU3U~
V'lfl33W3:J. JO AJ.I3
eln~~w~~Jo ,(lD
IU:Jwdol:JA:JO ::)!WOUrog,
ueld UO!1elu:Jw:JldwI
IU:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!Wouro3'
IU:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!Wouro3'
:Jsn pUlr"]
IU:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!wouro3'
IU:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!Wouro3,
IU:Jwdol:JA:JO ::)!Wouro3'
IU:JW:JSroeW Qlh\OJD
lU:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!WOUrog,
:JSn pUlr"]
lu:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!Wouro3'
lu:Jwdol:JA:JO :>!Wouro3'
:Jsn Ptm'l
lU:Jwdol:JA:JO ::)!Wouro3'
lU3W3m dD
S J~lU~ Ru!uueld ~q~
-
-
S:J!l:JU!^" 01 WS~mOl/Ueld lU:Jwdol:JA:JP :>!WOUo::Y.) :J!~ 171 .
-
S:J/1?I<J<JW poo'l.Loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
S:JSO SU!1e.I:Ju:JS :JnU:JA:ll 10J puel Su!punolJns JO :JSO :JZ!w!xew pue 1l0Wre puedx3 n .
X!W h.JRlu:Jw!ldwro ;).lOW e :JA:JN:>e 01 S:Jss:JU!snq JO U0!1lOOI:J1SU!Slllnrou:J JO Al!1!Q!SSOd Zl .
S:J/1?I<J<JW POO'l.Loqq:JpN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
sQof SU!Aed l:JQS!q 'A11SOPU! U1r.)p lUeh\ - lu:Jwdol:JA:JO le!l1sopuI 11 .
h.J1SOPU! l:>lllue 01 S:JA!1U:J:>U! :JP!AOJd 01 .
s:J/1?];}<JW poo'l.Loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
;)::)uereQ SU!sooQ/sQof 10J fY.}:Ju - 8:}!1!UllJ.JOddo lU:JWAOldw:J JO }(::)lr"] 6 .
s:J/1?];}<JW poo'l.Loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
lU:Jwdol:JA:JP le!lISOpu! pue lep1:Jwwo:> 'SU!SOOQ U! :Jllll A:>U'e::leA tPirn 8 .
s:J/1?];}<JW POOf(.Loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
(1:J1U;)::) UO!1U:JAUro ':J.Q1r.)QINdwe) s:J!1!1!:>eJ ptre S;)!1!A!pe le1nlln::) :llOW 10J fY.}:JN L .
ss:JU!soq UO!lnQ!lIS!P ptre SU!ltlJ:>eJnuew lqS" :JStunO::)U3 9 .
s:J/1?];}<JW POOf(.Loqq:J!<JN IV palrJ;}d<JN
1me SP1eA:JU!A :Jt{l ptre eU:J!lnw 'eln:y')w:J~ u:J:Jh\):JQ sdNSUO!1l?I:ll 1:J}(leW :JQl uo ;)Z!lRl!dlD ~ .
lU3wd013A3(1 ;)!WOUO;)~
83~V J;>3fqnS Ag A~muwns S3nsS} we(Z:OI 16/90/60
w8~3o~d u81d Itu3u3f)
V'In;)~:tI.L.!IO A.LI;)
i
\
eln~~w;).L./o All:) ~r iJU!UUBld gq.L
-
- -
sfj,,!1;};}W'pOOf{.LOQf{8!<'N IV p;ntJ;}d;}~
UOlll?AI:lSUO:J 's> :l:>edS u:ldO' S:llOle:lJ II?IU:lWU01~AU:l 1:lQl0 PUl? S:ld018 01 :lAp!SU:lS - U!IW:ll tp~M u~ PU:llq Plnoqs se~ :lP~SfI!Q u~ lU:lWdol:lA:lQ ~ .
uOlleAl:lsuO:J 's> :l:>edS u:>do
:>80 PUlrJ' SIl?AOJdde lU:lWdOI:lA:lP q8nonn :l:>eds u:xIo :>ldWl? JO UO~I~~p:lp :u!n b:l~ p .
:>SO PUlrJ
ueld UO!lelU:>m:>ldwI
U8~S:lQ ^HUnmmO:J' 8U~pRI8 ssew UelIl1:>Q1RI pnU:>W:U:>U! 10J P:l:lN ( .
UOlleAl:lsuO:J 's> :l:>edS u:>dO
:l80 PUlrJ' sp.m^:>U~A OlIUeUOdW! SlU:lllO:> J~e Ploo 01 .<t~AmSU:>S lu:>wdol:>A:lP 10J P:l:lN Z .
S:l:>~AI:lS/S:l!1!lped :>Hqnd, l:lleM puno18 JO UOll:>:lIOld pue JJOUOJ ueq1n JO Sl:>l?dwI 1 .
lU3W31:!I d~ UO!l1fA.J~uo;)/Al!A!l!SU3S IBl U3WUO.l!A U:!I
lu:lwdol:l^:lQ :>~ouoog, UMO~ PIO pue :lS100:> Jl08 'S:l~:>U~M 01 P:lll?l:>l Wspnol JO SPl?dw! :lZIl?UV 61 .
lu:lwdol:l^:lQ :>~ouoog, SI:>lnwwo:> JO sp:Y.lU le~:>:lds ss:uppl? 01 - lU:lwdOI:l^:>Q lep1:lWwO:J 81 .
IU:lwdol:>A:lQ :>!Wouoog, IIl?W ll?uo~8:u P:l:lN L 1 .
sfj,,!13;}W pOOf{.Loqf{8F'N IV p;)lv;}d;}~
S:l:>~AI:lS/S:l!l!IPl?d :>Hqnd s:m!U
lu:lwdol:l^:lQ :>~ouoog, -nuoddo uO!ll?:ll:>:U/Il?PJ;)Wwo:> :>le^~d PUl? s:>llHPl?J UOlle:l1:>:U :>Hqnd 10J p:r.>u - SI:>8eu:>:>J 10J S:>!l!^!l:>l? JO )!:>1?1 91 .
:lSO PUlrJ
Ul?Id UOlll?IU:>W:>ldwI- S;)HS ;)81l?1 JO ~:>l?1 - SI;)sn lep1:>wwoo/Il?~lsnPu~ JO :>8mu e 10J puel JO Al!1Jql?I!l?^'V ~1 .
lU3W31:!I dD lU3WdOI3A3(1 ;)!WOUO:>3:
U3.1V l;)~rqns AU A.lUwumS s;}nsSJ: WB(Z:OI 16/90/60
W1U~O.ld uUld IU.I~u~
VIO;):!IW:!I.L,jO A.LI:J
p.ln;);)W~~ 10 AI!:) L J~lU;o ~U!UUP.ld ~q~
- -
- -
AI;)les
UOnl?,u;)suo::> ~ :r.>l?dS u;)do. ;)Iq!se;)} lU;)}X;) wnwpmw ;)ql 01 s:nmoo ;)8eU!elp Ie.mleu u!t?1u!ew Z .
-
AI;)}es
Uoneln:>l!;). [enU;)P!~l 8u!1s!x;) 01 S1:>edw! ;)Z!W!U!W 01 Slued lq8!IJ P!ll~lI t .
-
lUO)WOll3 df> AJOlJBS 1f} qJlBOlH
-
S~"!~"W POOf(.I0qr{~PN IV p;Jlv;Jd,W
UOnl?,u;)suo::> ~ :r.>l?dS u;)()O' ;)l:U:>UOO Ql!h\ ;)Z!I;)UUelp IOU op - ~;):UJ eln:Y.)w;)~ 8uole s;)npmt.JOddo UOpe;)l:>;)l ;)P!Mld n .
S~"!~"W POOf(.Ioqr{~l;1N IV p;Jlv;Jd;J~
(;)Idwex;) poo8 ~led
uone,u;)suo::> ~ :r.>eds u;)()O' :uenbs ;)lwV SJfJl?d I;)A;)I AJ!1JtlWWOO PUl? pooqJOqq8!;)u 10} J);};)U - ;)sn leuO!1l?:u:Y.U ;)An:>e JO} puel~led}o ~:>'l!'] 01 .
uone,u;)suo::> 7fJ :r.>edS u;)dO S~"!~"W POOf(.lOqr{~PN IV p;Jlv;Jd;J~
ueld UOnelu;)w;)[dwI' uone:u:>:u JOJ spuellOJIUOO POOO 'S1U;)W;)se;) Al!Inn JO ;)Sn 6 .
uone,u;)suo::> 7fJ :r.>edS u;)dO
;)Sn pU'l!']. s;)Al;)~Jd [e.mnn:>!l8e JOJ JY.l;)U - ptm[Wle} 01U! lU;)wq:>eOJ:>u;) lenU;)P!~lI 8 .
Al;)}es
uone,u;)suo::> ~ :r.>edS u;)dO' ;)Iq!se;)} lU;)1X;) wnwpcew ;)ql 01 s:r.>moo ;)8l?u!\?Ip l\?InleU u!elU!ew L .
S~,,!I""W POOf(.lOqr{~PN IV p31v;}d;J~
uone,u;)suo::> 7fJ :r.>edS u;JdO
u8!S;)Q AHunwwO;). ;Ju!l;)8p!l W;J1S;)h\ ;)Ql ^petn:>!1led - S;)Plsmq ;J,u;JS;)Jd 9 .
lUOlWOlI3 df> UO!lBA.JOlSOO:.J/Al!A!l!SUOlS IRJUOlWOo.qAU3
BOl.JV pOlfqns AU A.nnUlUtlS sOlnsSf WP.fZ:OI 16/90/60
wn.dJwd UBld I1UOlUOlf>
Vlil;)ID'i3.L.!IO AJJ:.J
I
\
~In~gwg~ JO ^ HI
~S~ON,
-
A1:))1lS'
-
A1:))1lS'
-
Al:)JgS'
-
A1:))1lS'
-
Al:)JgS
UO!lgln:>J~~,
A1:)JgS
S:xl~A.I~S/S~!l!l!:)l!.1 :>!lqnd
:ISO PlIlrl
UO!ll?ln:>J!J'
A1:)Jl?S'
gU~snoH'
~SO PlIlrl
Ut!ld UO!ll?lU~W~ldwI'
lU<lW<lI:tl d{)
J~lr ~U!UUUld :Jlf.L
-
SPt!dw~ :lS~OU :xlnp~J Ol :I(q!Sl!:lJ U~qM SIIl?M 'SA SUJJ:lq :ISO Z1 .
J:llU:lJ l?Wnl?J.L A:)U:lgJ:lW3 P:I:lN n .
S:JUf1<J<>JV POOf/.Joqf/:J!;W lTJ p<>lTJ<Jd<>'8.
~~ t!ln:>:lW:I.L ql!M p;)'Jl?pOSSl? SpJl?Zl?q pool.1 01 .
(WS!Jll01 01 fY.lll?I:).I) UMO.L PIO U! :lW!-I:) p:lSl!~J:>uI 6 .
:)ns~ A1:lJl?S - }fJt!d lu:)wnuow JO UO!lt!pt!~:)a 8 .
~lSl?M snOpll?Zt!q gunnl?q - S~lnOJ '1:>ru.L L .
s:JUf1<J<>JV POOf{.Joqf/:J!<>N lTJ p<J1TJ<Jd<>'8.
st:>muo:) ~sn PUl?l 'uO!lgln:)lp :>~JJlU1 'At~Jl?S ':)S!ou - uo~sul!dx:) 1l0d1~l? :lIQ!ssod W01J SPl?dWI 9 .
s:JUf1<J<>JV POOf{.Joqf/:J!<>N lTJ p<J1TJ3d<>'8.
:).II?:) 11?:)~fY.lW :lIQgplOJj1l PUg S:l!HI!:)l?J II?:)~P:lW J:)U~aIOW JOJ P~:)N S .
A:>ugdn:>:x> gu~snoq Ol fY.llt!laI S:lpO:> :xlloJU3 t> .
s:JUf1<J<>JV POOf{.JOqt[:J!<>N 1TJ P<>ITJ3d<>'8.
suo!l:>:ldsu~ UJJoJl~ ptm UO!l:>nJ1SUO:> 10l!UoW - S:lpo:> gU~Pl!nQ ;Y.)10JU3 (: .
AJ<lJCS 't1 qnC<lH
C<l.IV J;)<lfqnS AU: A.ICUlWnS s<lnsSJ W~(Z:OI 16/90/60
WC.I~o.Id uCld IC.I<lU;}{)
VIfl::JD\I:tI.L.iO A.LI::J
eln:>~w~~ JO Al!:)
s:r.>!A.I~s/s~!lm:>ed :>!Iqnd'
^l~Jes.
~S!ON'
^1~Jes,
8u!SOOH'
Al~Jes"
~S!ON
ueld uO!lmU~w:>ldwI'
^l:>JRS'
s:r.>!A.I~S/s~!l!I!:>ed :>!Iqnd
uO!leAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>eds u~O'
^mmo l!V.
lU3W313: dD
6 J~lU~ ~u!uueld g4~
-
-
S:JUJ1;J;JW poo'lowqt{:J!;JN IV p31v;Jd;J'8
";)1:> 'SpeOl p:>^edun ':>YJeJl 01 ~np SUO!l:>!lls:>l ss:r.>:>e - S~W!l :>SUod~l :>:>!AJ~S :r.>!I0d pUe:>lJd ZZ .
s8ue8 '8U!l~l!01 ':>W!l;) - UMO~ PIO JO 1~A\ 8U!sooq JO Sl:>edwI IZ .
:>YJel1 WOlJ :>S!ON OC:: .
^ll~dOld pue SUOSl~d JO ^l~Jes - SW~lqOld ~lel:>l 8ueD 61 .
W:>lqOld ~w!l;) sS~lppe 'sun!!!:> lO!U:>S :r.>eldSlP 1,UOP 'Je!lU:>p!S~l JO X!W l:>U:Kl pue :>pel8dn - l~~llS lofnd 81 .
SllWH ~:>ds :r.>lOJU~ pue lSOd L I .
S:JUJ1;J;JW POOIJoWqt{:J!;JN 1tJ p31lJ;Jd;J'8
sl:>^:>1 :>S!OU :>Iqeld:>:>:>e qS!lqmS'iI 91 .
S:JUJ1;J;JW poo'l.loqt{:J!;JN IV p31v;Jd;J'8
l~lU:>:> uO!lR:>!Unwmo:> ^:>U~8l~W~ P:>:>N 51 .
S:JUJ1;J;JW POOIJ.loq'l:JPN IV p31v;Jd;J'8
IOllUO:> DOUOl Wl01S ~lenb~pe :>lOSU~ - splezeq poog le!lu~lod PI .
s:JUJ];J;JW POOIJ.loqt{:J!;JN IV p31v;Jd;J'8
q1MOl8 :un1nJ JO Sl:>edw! ^mmb l!e ~Z!w!UlW - eln:>:)w~~ lOJ ^l!Imb l!e !OJqlle~q U!elU!ew n .
AJ3J8S '1f} qll8;)H
83.JV l;)3fqns Ag: A.l1mnuns S3nsSJ: WBfZ:01 16/90/60
WC.l~O.ld u81d 11U3u3D
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L.!IO A.LI:J
i
\
eln:>~wgl JO '\1t')
8U!SOOH'
8u!SOOH
ueld uOHe1u~w:>ldmI'
8u!SOOH
~Sn ptm'J.
8u!SOOH'
8u!SOOH
~Sn ptm'J.
8u!SOOH
~sn ptm'J.
8U1SOOH
Ueld uO!le1U~W:)ldWI'
~sn ptm'J
ueld uO!le1u~W:>ldWI'
8ulSOOH'
8u!SOoH"
8u!SOOH'
lU3W313: dD
I"'T J;JH ijU!UUBld ~4~
---'
- -
S)!led :)woq :>nqow pue sopuro AlHenb l~q8!Q '8UlsnOq lO!U:>S :>lOW :>8elnO;)U3 IT .
S:JUJ1;J;JW POO'l.loqq:J!;JN IV p31lJ;Jd;J'8
(8U!sooq pue I!m:>l) p:>sn P:>XlW lO 8U!sooq Al!SU~P q8,q lU~W~ldwl 01 suo!lnlos u81S~P :)^!lR:>l:> lOJ P~~N 0 I .
s:JUJ];J;JW pOO'l.loqq:J!;JN IV p31lJ;Jd;J'8
s~so le!lu:)Pls~l AllSU:)P q8!Q :)Sl:)dS!p 01 P~~N 6 .
W~lqOld ~W!l:> sS:)lppe 'SU:>ZHP lO!U:)S :r.>eldSlP l,uoP 'lellU~P!S:)l JO xlW l:)U:Kl pue ~pel8dn -l:):)llS (Ofnd 8 .
s:JUJ];J;JW POOIJ.loqqS!;JN IV p;JllJ;Jd;J'8
SlO!U:>S pue Sl:)Anq :)woq :)W!llSlg lOJ 8Ulsnoq :>lqeplOJJe - S)!led :)woq :)I!qow Ulel~~ L .
sSUJ];J<JW POOIJ.lOqqS!<JN IV p31lJ;JO<J'8
X1W l~n:>q p:>:>U - ~!l!SU:)P Je!lU:>p!S:>l JO :>8Uel e lOJ ueld 9 .
UA\O~ Pia JO lS:>M e:>Je AllWeJ-mnw U! suo!l!puro 8u!sooq lood S .
:>le!ldOldde ~l:)qA\ Se:>Je AJHu~P! - 8u!l~sop le!lu~P!S:>llOJ Almqlssod p .
s:JUJ];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p31lJ;Jd<J'8
~:>:>l~ m1:)!lnw: U! 8u!^H s~l~woq JO sp:>:>u SS~lPPV f .
8u!sooq :>lqeploJJe JO ~:>OIS :)se~l:>uI c:: .
8ulsooq AllSU:>P q8!Q ':)wroul A\01 JO lUOOwe :>q1 :>z!w!U1W 1 .
~tI!snOH
83.JV l:J3fqnS A9: A.l8WWnS S3nsSJ: WBfZ:O I 16/90/60
W8.1~O.ld ueld le.l3u~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L.!IO A.LI:J
e3.JV p3fqnS A9: ,uewwns sansSJ:
WC.1~O.1d ueld 11U3U;)D
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L .!I 0 A.LI:J
we[z:Ol 16/90/60
lU;)W;)I3: dD
S!SAICUV pedWJ
ueld UO!le1U~W~ldwI'
8U!l01lUOW pue SlU:>W:)l!Ob:u uone8!llW l~fOld ~AOldWI
1
S:r.>lAJ:)S/S~lmped :>!Iqnd'
lu~w~8euew qlA\OlD
:>sn pUtr"J
ueld UO!lelU~W~ldwI'
lu~wdol:)^:>P :unlnJ lOJ Alpede:> l:)A\:>S :)lenb~pe ~lnsu3 c::
leUo!8:u pue 1e:>01 e qloq wOlJ pue Sl:>edwl Wl~l 8uOI pue lloqs JO S!SAleUe
:>^IP~dSl~d
8u!UUeld :>^!su~q~ldwo:> 10J P:>:>N
[
.
.
lu~w:)8euew q1MOlD
s:r.>lAJ~S/s~ll!lped :>!Iqnd'
s:JUJ];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv;Jd;J'N
Slu:)w~^Oldwl :>:>'AJ~s/~mp0l1SelJU! JO
lSO:> ~leqS l!eJ Aed OlIU~wdol~^~P A\~N
p
.
ueld UOne1u~w~ldwI'
s:JUJ];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p;Jlrod;J'N
:r.>ueu:>lU!eW ~dOls l~U~q P:>~N
5
.
1u~w:>8euew q1A\OlD
ueld UonRlU:>W:>ldwI'
Alddns l~eA\ :>8euew '~:>lAJ~S/:UOl:>Ollse.gu!
s:JUJ];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p;J]rod;J'N
:)seqd A!l~dOld - Q1A\0J8 :>8euew 011U\?llodwI
9
.
lU3W313: dD
3Sfl pu8']
:)Sn pUlrl.
uO!leAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>eds u~dO
:>sn putr"J.
SlU~^:> UO!l~l:>~l leuo!8:>llOJ OOne:>Ollu~ueWl~d lOj
~AJ~~ld lelOlln;)!l8e lOJ P:>:)u
~~N
pue{WleJ OlD! lu:>wq:>eol:>u~ le!lu~Pls~~
1
c::
eln;)gWg~Jo Al!:)
~Sn pUtr"J.
II
SSUJ1<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN
spm,{:)U!^/AllUnO;) ~U1M ~A.I~S~ld
IV p;Jlv;Jd;JN
JglU~ ijUluUBld g4~
[
.
e3.1V p3fqnS A9: ,.ucwwnS s;)nsSJ:
W1U~O.1d uCId lC.1;)U~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L .{ 0 A.LI:J
WBfZ:01 16/90/60
lU3W3t:i1 dD
~Sn ptm'J
ueld u01lelu~w~ldwI'
~sn le!lu:>p!S~l pue l~l:>eleq:> lelOl ql!A\
s:JUJ];J;JW POO'l.loq'l:JFW ]V p;J1V;Jd<JN
lu:>wdOI~^:)P le!llsnpu1
~lOlnJ JO A1!I1qnedwO:)
p
3sfl pu8']
.
~Sn pue"J
ueld UOnelU~W~ldmI'
6L AeA\q8rn 800le lU:)wdol:)^:)P le!:>J:)wwo:> WOJJ le!lu~P!S~J 8u!l:)Dng
5
.
~Sn pue"J
ueld uone1u~w~[dwI'
lepl~wmo:>
lOJ wnW!xew ~!lOlS p JO [
SllW!l1q8!:)q :)^!l:>!ll~l :uow
9
.
~Sn pUe"J.
sSIf!];J<JW pOO'l.loq'l:J!<JN ]V p31v<Jd<JN
1l0W!e JO
Uo!suedx:) le!lU~lod :>lepowwo:>:>e pue ~l1!^!l:>e lloW!R tlHA\ :>Iq!ledwo:> :)q PJOoqs 1l0W1e punOle q1A\Ol8 ~m1nd L
.
~Sn pUe"J.
sPooqlOqq81~u 01 AnU~lU:>^OO:> ~e:>ol :Kl Plnoqs
~sn :r.>lAJ:>s pue
!e1~~ 8
.
~Sn ptm'J
ueld UO!le1u:>W:>[dwI'
s:JIf!];J;JW poo'l.loqq:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
8u!l~JJnq :>lmb:>pe JO
s:>msu:)p le!lu~P1s~l u:>:>A\l~q uO!l!SUel~ 6
.
:>Sn ptm'J.
sSIf!];J<JW pOO'l.loq'l:JPN ]V p<Jlv<Jd<JN
s:JIf!];J<JWPOO'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p31tJ;Jd<JN
~le!ldoldde le!llsnpu!/Iepl~wwo:> -lloW!V A:)lIeA q:>u:Ud punOle le!lu~P1s:u oN Ot
.
lu~w~8euew qlMOlD'
~1 el A:>ue:>e^ q8!Q
's8el ~lOl:>OllSelJU!
s:JIf!];J<JW pOO'l.loq'l:J!<JN ]V p31v<Jd<JN
lSRJ 001 Sl qlM0l8 JO ~lel
1U:uJn~
n
.
eln;)~wg~ JO ft_.
,
lu:)w~8euew qlMOJD
~sn pue"J
lelu~W~ldwI'
ueld UO!
{eu0!8:)l pue 1e:>01 e Qloq WOlJ pue Sj:>edw! Wl:>l 8uo[ pue lloqs JO S!SAJeue
sSIf!];J<JW POO'l.loq'l:J!<JN ]V p31v<Jd<JN
~^IP~dSl~d
8UlUUe[d ~^lsu~q~ldwo:> 10J P:>~N 'lI
J~l~r
'aU!UUeld ~q~
.
eln;)~w~~ JO A1D
-
-
ueld UO!le1U:)W~ldwI
lu~WdOI~^~a :>!WoU0:>3'
8u1snoH
:>sn ptm'J.
~sn putr"J
lu~Wdol~^~a :>!WoU0:>3'
~Sn ptm'J.
~sn pUlrl
ueld uO!lmU~W~ldWI'
lU:lW~~euew qlA\OlD
s:r.>lAJ:lS/s~ll!lped :>nqnd'
1u~w~8euew q1A\OJD
lu~WdOI~^~a :>!WoU0:>3'
lu~w~8euew q1A\OJD
ueld uO!lmU~W~ldwI'
1u~w~8euew q1MOlD'
lU3W313: dD
n J~lU~ ~U!UUeld g4l
-
-
S:J,,?l<J<JW pOO'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
s~sn 8u!lel~u:)8 ~nu:)^:u JOJ Puel 8u!punouns JO ~sn ~Z!w!xew pue lloW1e puedx3 IC:: .
8lI!SIloq ~lqeplOJJe lOJ SUO!le:>OI :)le!ldOldde AJ!lU:)PI OZ .
UO!8:)l U! pUelle!llsnpU!lJePl~WWO:> lOJ puew~p ~lOlde:> 01 Al!UnlloddO 61 .
Sl~lU:):> le!:>J~wwo:> punOle Al!SU~P l:)q8!q lOJ A1!l!q!SSOd 81 .
~sn Puel u~~Ml~q 8u!l~JJnqfUOmsuelll~n~q JOJ P:>:)N L 1 .
S:JIf!I<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
J~leA\ p:>W!el~l JO ~sn . ^Iddns l:)leA\ :>!ls~wop ~lm~PV 91 .
S:JIf!I<J<JW poo'l.loqq:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
lu:>wdol:)A:)P le!llsnpu! pue lepl~WWO:> '8U!snoq U1 ~lel k>ue:>e^ Q8rn 51 .
s:JIf!];J<JW poo'l.loqq:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
Alddns l~leA\ :)8euew '~:>!AJ~S/~JOl:>Ollse.gu! ~SRqd A!l~dold - Q1A\0J8 ~8euew OllU\?llodwI PI .
s:JIf!];J<JW POOlJ.loqq:JPN IV p31v;Jd<JN
e:>Je spJe^~u!^ pue e:ue J:)UU~S ~~tr"J l:>:)lOJd - 1l0W1e pUnOle q1M0J8 ~8euew n .
3Sfl pUtFJ
e~).1V pafqns A9: A.1CWWnS s;)nsSJ: WC[Z:Ol 16/90/60
We.1~O.1d u81d le.13UaD
Vlfl:J3:W3:.L.!IO A.LI:J
83.JV pafqns A9: A.1muwnS S3nSSJ:
W8.1~OJd u81d l1Uau~
Vlfl:J:mI3:.L .{ 0 A.LI:J
wefZ:01 16/90/60
eln:>;lW::llJO '\lIj
-
-
8u1snoH
~sn ptm'J.
-
:)Sn PUe"J.
-
:)Sn ptm'J.
-
UOneAJ:)SUOJ 'S' :r.>edS uOOo'
:)sn ptm'J
lu~wdol:>^~a :>!WouroH'
~Sn ptm'J.
:)sn ptm'J.
8u1snoH
~sn ptm'J.
:)Sn ptm'J
1u~wdol:)^~a :>!WouroH'
lU3w313: dD
aSfl pu8']
e:>Je spJeA:)U!A :)q) pue en:>!lnw
s:JIf!];J<JW pOO'l.loq'lSPN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
'eln:>~W~~ U~:)A\l~q sd!QsuOnel:U
l:)~lew ~ql uo :>ZHm1d~
z:z:
.
SlOlU~s pue Sl:>,(nq :>woq ~W!11Slg lOJ 8U1snoq ~lqeplOJJe
s:JIf!];J<JW POOlJ.loq'lS!<JN IV p<JltJ;Jd<J~
S)!led ~woq :)I!qow U1el~~
[c::
.
~sn ~:>lAJ~S
sno!8!1:>l JOJ suo!leu8!s:)p ~sn PUR[ ~~N
PC::
.
~p:r.>J~w
le:)u ~sn PURl ~JOIO.':I
~c::
.
(J~lU:r.> UOHU:)^uro ':1Jl~ql!Qdwe) S~nm:>ej pUR ~!l!^H:>e lelnlln:> :uOW JOJ ~~N
9'l
.
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqqS!<JN 1tJ p31lJ;Jd<J~
(s)}fled I:)^~I ,(llUnwwro l~qlO ~~u
SlU:)P!S:U
lie 01 ~lq!S~e 10U }fled SlJodS a
.
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqqSPN IV p31tJ;Jd<JN
S:JIf!I<J;JW pOO'l.loqqSPN IV p<Jlv<Jd<J~
s:r.>!AJ:)S/:>l0l:>0l1SeljU1 l~qlo 'slooq:>s uo 8u!sooq Al1SU~P q8!Q JO pedWI
8'l
.
p~ ~ oq:>ue~ uo puod }f:>np :)Ql ~A.I~s~ld
6C::
.
T _
S:JIf!I<J<JW pOO'l.loq'lS!<JN IV p<JltJ;JO<J~
S:JIf!I<J<JW pOO'l.loQ'lS!<JN IV p31tJ;JO<J~
s~sn lenu:)p!s:)J ,(l!SU~P q8!Q :)Sl:)dS1P 01
~~N
J;llV
O[
ijulUUBld ~4~
.
elO;)~W::l~ JO Al!J
:)sn pUtr"J
ueld OO!lRlU:>w:)ldwI-
ueld OO!lRlO:>W:)ldwI'
:)sn pUtr"J.
u8!s:>0 Al!uowwO:).
:)sn pue"J
Ju:)wdOI:)^:)O :>lWoU0:>3'
u81s:>0 A!lUnww~.
:>sn putr"J
ueld UOnRlU:>W:)ldwI'
:)sn putr"J
ueld U011RlU~W:)ldwI'
8u!snoH
ueld UOnelu~w:)ldwI'
:)sn putr"J
ueld UOnRlU:>W:)ldwI
u8!s~0 A1lUnww~.
lU3W313: dD
SI J~lU~ ijU!UUBld ~q~
-
-
le!lu~P!s:u lor ~8mlloJ 8UlUOZ U!e1~~ OP .
-
S:JIf!I<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv;Jd<JN
S~lnl;)OlIS JO ~Inq lO ssew 8u!PI!Oq 01 p~el:>l splepUtrlS lOj ~~N 6[ .
-
1u:>wdol~^:)P ~sn P~x1w 8u!MOne ,(q UA\O~ Pia U! s~woq J:)Plo ~pel8dn 01 le!IU~lOd 8[ .
S:JIf!I<J<JW POO'l.loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
(s~e Ue!ll~p~ ':)de:>spuel'8u!UUeld ~11s '~lOJ:>~J!Q:lIe) Ju:)wdOI~^~p lepJ~WWO:> Al!Ienb l~q8!q ~~N L[ .
S:JIf!I<J<JW POO'l.loqqS!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
sqof 8u!,(ed J~q8!Q 'AllsnPU! u~p lUeA\ -lU:)wdOI~^~a le!llsnpuI 9f .
s:>sn Ie!llsnpu1 pue lepl:.lWlUO:> 8uowe Almqnedwo:> lemp~l!q;)le lOj ~~N ~[ .
sSIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqt{SPN IV p<Jlv;Jd<JN
SUO!1;)~dsu! UllOJl~ pue UO!l:>OlJSUO:> JOllUom - ~po:> 8U1PI!nq :Y.>10JU3 P[ .
s:JIf!];J<JW POO'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv;Jd<JN
peo~ Rl!le81ew uo 80!snoq ,(l!SU~P q8!Q JO uonepel8~p le!1u~lod ([ .
UA\O~ Pia JO lS~A\ ~Je AllWeJ-mnm U! SUO!l!PUO;) 8u1snoq lOOd C::[ .
A!:)!le^ ~~U - Sl~lU:r.> lepl~WlUO:> JO UO!l:>UttJ/U8!~p :)^!l~l:> ~8emO;)U3 1[ .
aSfl PU8']
83.1V p;)fqnS AU A.l8WWnS S<lnsSJ: wefZ:01 16/90/60
we.1~o.ld U81d 18.13U~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L'{O A.LI:J
\
eln;)~W~l JO ^",
,{l~Jes.
-
lU3W313: dD
~Sn putr"J
u8!s~a ,{llUnwwOJ'
~Sn pUtr"J
u81S~a ,{llUnWWOJ'
~Sn pUtr"J
ueld UO!lRlU~W~ldwI'
ueld u01lelu~w~ldwI'
ueld u01le1u~w~ldwI'
8u1snoH
ueld UOnelU~W~ldwI'
~sn putr"J.
~sn pU1r]
ueld UO!lRlU~W~ldwI
uoneln:>JD'
lU3W313: dD
- J~l~" ijU!UUCld ~qJ.
..j
- -
J:>lU~ ewnel~ A;)U~8l~W3 P~~N I .
-
S;);)!A.)3S 19 S;)!l!l!:>C.!I ;)nqod
-
UA\O~ PIO P~lu~~O Ul?~ls~p~d e ~le~l~ 8P .
-
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
UA\O~ PIO :r.>uequ~ pue ~AJ~S~ld Lv .
-
s~1!s ~8lel JO ~:>el - Sl~sn lepJ~WwO:>/le!llsnpU! JO :)8uel e lOJ puel JO AHnqeneAV 9l> .
pJeA UO!l:>Ollsuo:> e lOJ ~lqeneAe puel ON ~v .
lU~WAOldw~ Je~u ~Je:> Aep JO U01S1AOJd >> .
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
(8u!snoq pue Het:u) ~sn ~x!W lO 8u!snoq A!!SU~P q8!Q 1U~W:)ldw! 01 suonnlos u81s~P ~A!l~l;) lOJ P:>~N H .
s:JIf!];J~W POOIJ.loq'l:JpN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
Sl~lU~:> lepl:)wwo:> d!llS lIews lu~wdol~A~P ~8elnO:>Sla ll> .
s:JIf!];J;JW POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
Sl:>!llS!P lenU~P!~l lelOl qS!lqels:) pue splepuels lu~wdol~MP lelOl P~~N 1P .
3Sfl PU8']
C3.fV p;)fqnS A9: A.1CWWns S3nsSJ: WBfZ:01 16/90/60
W1U~O.1d ueld lC.13U~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L ~ 0 A.LI:J
eln;)~w~~ JO A1KJ
-
-
s:r.>lA.l~S/s~!J!I!:>ed :>!Iqnd
u81S~a AJ!UnWlUOJ.
-
s:r.>lA.l~S/s~!J!H:>ed :>!Iqnd
ueld uO!JRlU~W~ldwI'
-
s:r.>!A.I~S/s~!Hlped :>!lqnd
ueld UO!1RlU~W~ldwI-
-
s:Y.>lA.l~S/s~!lm:>ed :>!Iqnd
ueld uO!leJU~w~ldwI'
-
Ul?ld uO!Jelu~w~ldwI'
-
ueld uO!Je1u~w~ldwI'
-
ueld Uonelu:)w:)ldwI-
-
ueld UOne1u~w~ldwI'
-
s:r.>lA.l~S/s~!l!lped :>!Iqnd-
-
s:r.>lA.l~S/s~!l!lped :>!Iqnd'
-
s:r.>lAJ~S/s~n!lped :>!Iqnd
ueld UOnRlU~W~ldwI'
-
uO!leAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>eds u~dO
ueld UOne1u~w~ldwI'
lU3w313: dD
L1 JglU~ gU!UIJP-ld ~4J.
-
-
SR:1Je Iepl~wwo:> u1 s)!leA\~P1s snonu!luo:> JO }{:>tr"J n .
-
Slu:>w~^oJdw! p:>sodoJd pue lsed :u UMO.l PIO U! SlU~P!s:u 01 Al!^mSU~S JO }{:>tr"J ZI .
UMO~ PIO U! W:)lqOld ~8eU1elp peo~ n .
"lOPlllO;) Rl!le8lew ~qJ U1 AI!WeJ-!lInW ~Al:)S oJ ~led jO 1u~WdOI~^~P/U0!J!Slnbe ~zn!lo!ld 01 .
Sj:>!llS!P lU:)WSS~sse JU~lln:> Uo uO!leWloJu1 :>!Iqnd JO ~:>tr"J 6 .
S:JIf!I<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:JPN IV p<JltJ;Jd<JN
:)lqe1!Ob:> :)q Plnoqs Sju~w~^oJdw! peOl Ie:>ol JO 8upueuJd 8 .
lu~wdol~^~P M~U JjO 8u~oq:> ~~J 1u~wdol~^~P q8rn L .
s:JIf!J;J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p<J1V<Jd<JN
pue~Jed/~:>eds u:)do ~!nbe OJ suondo lie l~P1suOJ 9 .
:r.>lOJ :r.>!Iod All:> qS!lQRlS3 5 .
s:r.>!A.I:)s leuo!l!Ppe :)P!^oldf~!l!lpeJ JU~W~ldw1 OJ sws!Ueq~w 8upueug AJ!lU:>PI P .
8upueug Ju~w:>^oJdW1 :>!IqndJo 8u1z!8~lellS !OJ:Ue;:) [ .
1u~wdol:>^~P pue .UO!le:>l~P pue~led JOJ splepuels I~S 01 P~~N Z .
S3;)!A.13S 1fl S3!l!1pC.!J. J!1qnd
e3.1V p3fqns A9: A.lCWWnS s;)nsSJ: WBfZ:01 16/90/60
w1U~O.ld ueld IC.13U3D
Vlf1:JID-\I3:.L'{O A.LI:J
(
eln:>~w~~Jo All,
-
-
U011eAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~dO'
ueld uO!Jelu~W~ldWI
uOneln:>l!~.
s:r.>!AJ~s/s~n!l!:>ed :>!lqnd'
s:r.>!AJ~S/s~!l!l!:>ed :>!lqnd
uO!leAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~dO'
ueld UO!le1u~w~ldWI'
s:r.>!AJ~S/s~!l!lped :>!Iqnd.
S:r.>lAJ~S/s~!l!H:>ed :>!Iqnd
ueld UO!lelU~w~ldWI'
s:r.>!AJ~s/s~nm:>ed :>!Iqnd
ueld UO!lelU~W~ldwI'
S:r.>lA.l~S/s~!1!lped :>!Iqnd'
s:r.>!AJ~s/s~n!l!:>ed :>!Iqnd'
s:r.>!AJ~S/s:>ll!lped :>!Iqnd.
lU;)W313: dD
OT Jdll(:"'- ~U!UUBld dq~
-
s:J"!];J<JW poo'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<JltJ;Jd<JN
uO!l~J~J ~^!l:>e JOJ pUel :>Iqesn ~q Plnoqs S1:>~fOld lu:)wdol:>^~P q8nOJql P~P!^OJd poeI ~led \7C:: .
(8upneM u~lPI!Q:> JO Al~JeS) Sl:>lIJUO:> :>g]ell/looq;)S [c:: .
~le8~l8uo:> Ol Sl:>Joqel Aep JOJ uO!le:>OI P~~N lC:: .
S:JIf!I<J<JW pooq.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JH'
1000uo:> J]OUOl Wl01S ~lmb~pe :>lnsu~ - spJezeq poog le!lu~lod Il .
8u!ss:>lppe pue UO!le:>y!lU~P! peOJ U! A:>U~lS!SUO:> JOJ P~~N DC:: .
s:JIf!];J<JW POOlJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p31tJ;Jd<JH'
UA\O~ PIO u1 8u~Jed :uow pue Sju:)w:)^oJdw! oOlleln:>J!:> P~~N 61 .
UA\O~ PIO U! SWOOJ1~J :>!{qnd P:>~N 81 .
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JH'
J:)leA\ p~w!ep:u JO ~sn :u!n~J - W:>lSAS l~leA\ p:>W!el:l:u e JO lu:)wdoI~^~P ~8mo:>u3 L 1 .
sAeMpeol uo :)8eu!eJp J~Old :>lnsug 91 .
lu~wdol~^~P :unlnJ JOJ Alpede:> J~A\~S ~lenb~pe ~lnSU3 ~I .
lood 8U1WW!A\S A!!UOwwo:> ~Z!S-:>ldwAIO lOJ ~~N \71 .
S;);)!A.l3S '1f} S;)!l!1!:>c.{ ;)!1qnd
C3.1V p3fqnS A9: A.1CWWns S3RSSJ: WB[Z:Ol 16/90/60
w1U~O.ld uCld 11U3u~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L'{O A.LI:J
1Hn;);)W::l~ .10 ^lD 61 - J~lU~ ~U!UUBld ~q~
- -
- -
s:JIf!];J<Jw poo'l.loqq:JpN 1tJ p<Jlv<Jd;JH
S:r.>lAJ~S/s:Jnm~ed ~nqnd' mwoPHM pue :)lOU1SI3 ~~lrl 'Rll~!lnw ql!A\ ~mn:>eJ Al!UOwwo:> :)leqS 01 le!IU~10d Sf .
-
uO!leAJ~su~ 'S' :r.>edS u:)dO puePlled :)^OldW! pue ~1e:>lP~P 01 Sl~OI:)^:)P ~!nb:>l 01 S~!l!unlJoddo :)zlw!xeW 01 ~~N P[
Ueld UOnRlU:>m:)ldwI' .
S:r.>lA.l~S/S:>mIped :>!lqnd' UOnRlU:>W:)ldm! uo sn:>Oj - Q1A\0l8 :)lepowo:>:>e 01 ueld J~lsew J~leA\~lSeM JOj ~~N [[ .
s:r.>!A.I~S/s:)!l!lped ~!lqnd" lesods1P ~seA\ JOJ ~lnOJ '1:lnJl jO W~lqOld C::[ .
S:r.>lA.l~S/S~mlped :>!lqnd" J~leM punOJ8 JO UO!l~IOld pue JjOUOl ueqm jO sl:ledwI l[ .
S:r.>lA.l~S/~n!lped ~!lqnd' Sl:l!llS1P J~A\~S/l:)leA\ pue AlP u:>:>A\l:Kl uoneu1Ploo:> l~n~q ~~N O[ .
oonepulD- U01P1PS!lnf SUellro J~pun Slu~w~^OJdm! Jf:>elllseJ 01 ,(g~lellS P:>~N 6C:: .
s:JIf!];J<JW POOlJ.loqq:J!;W 1tJ p31v<Jd<JN
lu~w:>8euew qlA\OJD
S:r.>lA.l~S/S~mlped :>nqnd' 1u~WdOI~^~P A\~U ql!A\ lU:wn~UO:> JO OllO!ld SlU~W~^OldW1 :r.>!Al~S/:Jml:>OllSlUJU! J:)qlo pue peOl :U1nb~~ 8'l .
S:JIf!];J<JW pOOIJ.loqq8PN]V p31v<Jd;JN
S:r.>lA.l~S/S~nHped :>!lqnd' UA\Ol jO ~P1S lse:) uo P:>:)U - SUOnRlS ~g JO J~qwnu ~lenOOPV LC:: .
SSIf!];J;JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
(:)Idwex~ po08 ~led
UOneAl~SU~ 'S' :r.>eds U~O. :uenbS ~I!W) S)!Jed I:)^~I AllUnWWO:> pue pooqlOqq81~U JOJ P:>~U - ~sn JeOO!l~J:>:U :)^n:>e JOJ pUel~led JO ~:>e"J 9C:: .
S:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!;W 1tJ p<JltJ;Jd<JN
uO!leAJ~SU~ 'S' :r.>edS u~dO
Oeld UOnRlO:>W~ldwI' UOne:u:>:u JOJ SPuellOJ1UO:> poog 'SJU:>W:)SR~ "l!l!ln JO ~Sn 5C:: .
lU3W313: dD S3;)!A.);)S ~ S3!l!1pe.{ ;)!1qod
C;).1V p3fqnS Aa A.1CWWnS s;)nsSJ: WBfZ:01 16/90/60
w1U~O.ld ueld l1U3u~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L .!I 0 A.LI:J
1
"
~Jn:>~W~~ JO All') """' 5tr - aU!UUBld ~q~
-
- -
ueld oO!lelu~w:)[dmI
U01le[n:>lD- peo~ e[ed lR :>gP!lq ~AJ~S~ld 9P .
- -
s:JIf!];J<Jw POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
ueld uO!1elu~w~[dmI' :r.>ueu~lu1ew ~do[s J~n~q P:>~N SP .
- -
s:JIf!];J<Jw POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN ]V p<J1V<Jd<JN
s:r.>!AJ:)s/s~!1!1ped :>!Iqnd
UO!leAJ:)SUOJ 'S' :r.>eds u~do- UOH!Slnbe }'(Jedj:r.>eds u:xlo 'SIOOtps 'l~leM '[011UO:> poog 'SlU:>W~^Oldw! pe01 JOJ U0!1eu1PlOO:> [eU018~ ~^oldWI PV .
A1~Jes- ueld :)suods:u A:>u~8l~W~ AlP e dOI:>^~a fP .
s:r.>!AJ~S/s~!1!1ped :>!Iqnd
ueld U01lelu~w~ldmI' ~lq!~J u:)QA\ punOJ8l~pUn s~ll!l!ln ~:>e[d C::v .
s:r.>!AJ~S/s:>!1!1ped :l!lqnd' S:>!1:>ql~e pue Al:)Jes l:>p!SUO:> Plnoqs sl:)uueq:> IOJ1UO:> poog JO u81S~a Iv .
s:JIf!];J;JW POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
s:r.>!AJ~S/s:)!1!1!:>ed :>!Iqnd
1u~wdol~^~a :l!WouQ:>3- uejd lel~u~8 Ql1A\ p~leposse s:r.>!AJ:)S pue s~!l![peJ jO SlSO:> AJ!lU~PI OV .
s:r.>lAJ~S/s~!1!1ped :>!Iqnd' A[ddns l~leM 01 qlMolg ~1~ 6[ .
8u!UUeld UO!le:>OI ~l!s 100q:lS l~n~q lOJ ~~N S[ .
s:JIf!];J;JW pooIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
uO!leAJ~su~ 'S' :r.>edS u:xIO
ueld UO!le1U~W~ldwI' UO!l~l:>:)l JOJ se:ue 101lUO:> poog jO :>sn-!lInw }'(~~S L[ .
SSIf!];J3W POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<J]V<Jd;JN
S:r.>lAl~S/s~!l!lped :>!Iqnd
ueld UO!1elU~W~ldwI- speOl 8u!ls!x~ JO ~:>ueu~lu!l?w ~^OldWI 9[ .
lU3W313: d~ S3;)!A.1;)S 1jl S;)!l!1!;)C.{ ;)!lqod
e3.1V p3fqns A9: A.1CWWns S3nsSJ: wefZ:01 16/90/60
W1U~O.1d UCld 11U3U;)D
VlG:Jffi\I3:.I'{O "'.II:J
Bln;)gw~~ JO A1D IZ J~lU~ 5u!UUeld ;141..
- -
- -
S~:l!A.I~s/s~!l!lpe~ :>!Iqnd' S:>!l~q1~e pue A):)Jes J:>p!SUO:> p[noqs S[~uueq:> [OlIUO:> poog JO u81S~a p .
- -
s:r.>!A.I~S/s~ll!lped :>!lqnd' :)8:>IIOJ JO :)8~[[OJ lOlUnf lOJ :)P1^OJd/p:>~u ~lenle^3 [ .
- -
s:r.>!A.I~S/s~ll!lped :>!Iqnd' ^Iddns J~leA\ 01 q1A\OJ8 ~!~ Z .
- -
S:JIf!I<J<JW POO'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
S~:l!A.I~S/s~ll!lped :>!lqnd' lewoPI!M pue :)lOU1S!3 :)}{lrl 'Rll:)!lnw Ql!A\ ~ll![pej Al!Unwwo:> :>leqS 01 le!lu~lod I .
-
lU3W313: dD WSJleuo!3;)1I
-
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loq'l:JpN IV p31v<Jd<JN
s:r.>!A.I~S/s~!1!1ped :>!Iqnd. ~:>lAJ:>s :r.>!Iod Al!Ienb u1Rlu1ew I~ .
-
S:JIf!I<J<JW poo'l.loq'l:JpN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
S:r.>lA.l~S/s~!l!l!:>ed :>!Iqnd ~nlU
lu~wdo[~^~a :>!WoU0:>3. -Olloddo uO!le:U:>:ufJePl~WWO:> ~e^!ld pue s~nm:>eJ Uone:u:>:u :>!lqnd JOj p:>:>u - Sl~8eu:):)1 JOJ ~!l!^lpe JO ~:>lrl O~ .
-
s:JIf!];J<JW POO'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
80!snOH' }{:):1J~ Rll:l!lnw u1 8U1^!1 S~I:)woq JO sp:>:>u S~lpPV 6P .
-
sSIf!];J<JW poo'l.loq'l:J!<W IV p31tJ;Jd<JN
UO!1eA.l~suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~dO' Al!Unwwo:> :>ql1noq8nOJql S)!Jed pooqJoqq81~U/le:>ol JO uonnq!lls1P l:>n~g 8P .
SSIf!I<J<JW POOlJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
lu~w~8euew qlA\OlD
S:r.>lAJ~S/s~!1!1ped :>!Iqnd' J:)leA\ p:>W!el:>:1J JO ~sn - Alddns J~leA\ :>!ls~wop ~lenb:>PV LP .
lU3W313: dD S3;)!A.);)S '1f} S3!lH!;)e.!l ;)!1qnd
C3.1V p3fqns A9: A.1CWWns S3nsSJ: WRfZ:01 16/90/60
W1U~O.1d ueld l1U;)U~
Vlf1:J3:W3:.I.{O A.II:J
\
Bln:>~m~.LJo ~", - ~ j~lV ~U!UUEld ~q~
- j ~
- - -
S:JIf!I<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:JpN IV P<JltJ;JO;J'8
Al:)]RS
S:r.>lAJ:lS/s~!Hlped :>!lqnd
:)sn ptm'J
oOlle!O:>l!~. Sl:>lIJUO:> :)sn puel 'uO!leln:>J!:> :>YJell 'Al~Jes '~SlOU - uo!suedx:) 1l0W!e :)lq1ssod WOlJ Sl:mdwI n .
-
UO!leAJ~SUOJ 'S' :r.>eds o:)dO
~Sn ptm'J. ~:lU\?llOdW! 1e:>!lOlSlQ JO SR~le JO uO!lex~uuv n .
Ammo J!V. sMevsweJ80Jd Al!lROb J1e leu01g~l OJ :)suod~~ II .
S:JIf!I<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<W IV p<JltJ;Jd<JN
ueld UOnelu:)W:)ldWI' pUel~Jed/:r.>eds u:)do :u!Obe 01 suondo lie J:)P!suOJ 01 .
S:JIf!I<J<JW POOIJ.loqq:JFW IV p31tJ;Jd<JN
S:r.>lAJ~S/s~!Hlped :>!Iqnd oO!l!S!Obe ~ledt:r.>eds u~o 'slooq:>s 'J~leA\ 'IOllUO:> POOIJ 'Slu~w~AOldw1 peOlloJ uO!1eo!pJoo:> leuo18:u :)^OldWI 6
U01leAJ:)suOJ 'S' :r.>eds u~O. .
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:JFW IV p;ntJ;Jd<JN
1u:>w~8euew qlA\OlD
~sn ptm'J :)^!p~SJ~d
ueld UOnelu~w~ldwI' Jeoo!8~J pue 1e:>01 e Qloq WOlJ pue Sl:>edw1 Wl:)18uOI pue lloqs JO S!SA[eue - 8u!UUeld :)^!su:>q~Jdwo:> JOJ P:>~N 8 .
uO!1eln:>l!~. lSRO:> :lql 01 SlOP!llO:> uonellodsuRll :)8e.mO:>U3 L .
Al:)Jes Je!1u~P1s:>l 8U!ls!x~ 01 Sl:>edW! ~Z!w!U!W 01 SQled lq8m 1:>!l1~~ 9
uOneln:>llJ' .
S:J1f!13<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p<JltJ;Jd<J'8
S:r.>lA.l~S/s~!Hlped :>!Iqnd
ueld UO!1e1u~w:>ldwI' J:)leA\ p:>w1ep:u JO :)sn :u!nb:u - W~lsAS J~leM p:>W!el:>:>l e JO lu~wdol~^~P :)8mo::>u3 5 .
lU3w313: dD wS!lCUO!~311
e;).1V p;)fqnS A9: A.1CWWnS s3nsSJ: wUfZ:01 16/90/60
W1U~O.1d uCld 11U3u~
Vlf1:Jffi\I3:.I'{O A.II:J
el":>gw:JJ.. JO hl!:) fZ J~lU~ ~U!UUBld ~4~
- -
- -
00!l8flUJ!~- UA\O~ PIO pUnOJe 6L ~S :)le:lOI;lJ 01 ~~N 8 .
- -
S:JIf!I<J<JW poo'l.loq'lS!<JN IV p31V<JddN
UO!leJO:>J!~. se~le :r.>eds u~do 01 "~:}:>:>e :>>I!q pue SAe^'~'1lq JO '1:le"J L .
- -
S:JIf!I<J;}W pOO'l.lOqt(:J!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
uO!leA.l:>suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~dO' S)!Jed pue 'IMP lepI:>WWO:> 01 spooqlOqq81~U 8up[U!I SQled Ue!ll~p;)d leuOn !ppe JOJ P~~N 9 .
UOneAJ:>suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~dO" suo!leJ~P1suo:> A1:)Jes - SJ!ell ;)SlOq :uow JOJ P~~N 5 .
uoneJO:>J!~. ~[q!ssod l:)^:)U~qA\ p:>^edun :)q Plnoqs sl!eJ~ P .
UOneAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~O" ss:>:>:>e Ol ASR~ pue P~U1RlU!eW II:)A\ 'p:>ug~p 1I:>1t\ ':>Jes ~q p{Ooqs S^eM~~19 [ .
S:JIf!];J<JW POOlJ.lOqt(:J!;}N]V p31V;Jd<J~
SlOP~[[O:>
UOneJO:>lD' pue sle!l~Jle lie uo SQled ~~!q :)P1AOId - OO!l~l~l SR lsnf IOU 'I:)^ell Je:> 01 -lie ue se Uon:>unJ Plnol./s sl./led ~'1!g c:: .
uO!1eAJ~suOJ 'S' :r.>edS u~O. SJ1eJ1 ~SlOl[ :uow P~~N I .
lU3W313: dD U oncl n;).1!;) {Uo!l1.Q.lOdsuc.1.I
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqq8!<JN IV p31v<Jd<JN
~sn potr"J. ~sn puel 8u!punonns pue llod.I!V A:>neA q:>u:Ud J:>^O IOllUO:> AlD lOJ ~~N 51 .
S:JIf!I<J<JW poo'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p;}lv;Jd<JN
~sn potrJ. :)le!ldOldde le!llsnpU!/lepl~W1Uo:> -lloW!V A:)IJeA q:>u:Ud punole Ie1lu~P1s~l ON PI .
lU3W313: dD WS!lCUO!~311
U;).fV l;)3fqnS AU ,u8WwnS s3nsSJ: WBfZ:01 16/90/60
wro~O.1d UUld l1U3u~
Vlf1:Jffi\I3:.I .{ 0 A.II:J
eln:>~Wd~ JO All:>
lU3W313. dD
UOneln:lJlJ'
UOneln:lllJ'
uOneln:>J1~'
u81S:)O Al!UnW1U~
uO!le[n:lllJ-
UOneln:lJlJ"
ueld uonelu~w~[dwI
UOneln:lJ1~'
u011eln:lllJ'
uO!Je[n:lllJ.
U01le[n;)J1~'
s:r.>!A.I:>s/~mlped :l!lqnd
Ueld UOnRlu~w~[dWI'
ueld uonelu~w~[dwI
uO!leln:>JlJ"
"? J~ll'~'") gU!UUBld ~lf.L
-i
-
peo~ e[ed Ie ~1jP!lq :)AJ~S~ld 61 .
-
spew ll!P o!RlU!ew lo/pue p~^ed Sl:>:>llS P:>~N 81 .
-
sSIf!];J<JW POOIf.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<J11J;Jd<JN
SR~e lelOl-UOU JOJ UOnelu:>w:)ldm! JfleA\~P1s/qm:) jO ueld qS!lqRlS'iI L 1 .
-
6L AeA\q8rn pue zed tr"J Ie ^1~jeS uOneln:>llJ 91 .
-
sp.IepDels l:):1JlS lu~w~[dw! pue qS!lqRlS'iI ~l .
-
Sl:)IU:r.> 8u!ddoqs u1 UOne(O;)lp/s~:Y.>e JOOd PI .
-
s:JIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loqq:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
s~sn Jellu:)P1s:u poe Sl:>lU:>:l lU:>WAOldw~ U~~A\pq ss:r.>:>e :)^oJdWI n .
-
speoJ Jofew uo sAeA\}lled p~de:lspUelloJ P:>~N Z1 .
-
s81f!];J<JW POOIf.loqq:J!<JN 11J p<Jlv;Jd<JN
SpJepDelS lu~wdol:)^~P peol leJOl :)ug~O n .
-
sSIf!];J;JWPOOIf.loqt(:J!<JN IV p;Jlv<Jd<JN
s:)ssed.I~^o 8uns!X~ JO 8u!U~P!A\ pue ~ssed.I~^O AeM~~lJ :uow P:>~N 01 .
-
ISRO:> :)ql 01 SloPlllO:> uonellodsuel1 ~8emo:>u3 6 .
-
UOn Ulna.1!:J fUo!l8l.l0d SUU.I.L
-
83.JV l;)3fqnS A9: A.1CWWnS s;)nsSJ: WB[Z:0116/90/60
W1U~O.1d ueld IU.13U~
Vlfl33:W3:.I .{ 0 A.II:J
Bln:>~w~~ JO Al!:)
-
-
uO!Jeln:>JD.
-
Uoneln:>J1~'
-
uOHeln:>J!~.
-
UOneln:>lD.
-
uO!leln:>lD-
-
uoneln:>J1~'
-
uOHeIn:>J!~.
-
S:r.>lA.l~S/s~!1!1ped :>!Iqnd'
s:r.>lA.l~S/s~!l!1ped :>!Iqnd-
uoneln:>JD'
ue[d u01lelu~w:>ldwI
UOneln:>lD'
lU3w313: dD
5;Z JglU~ ~U!UUeld ~4.L
-
-
p~luelleM ~l:>qM S[eu81S :>YJeJl ~P1AOJd O[ .
-
sAeA\peOl uo ~:l!A.I~S jO SI~^~[ ~lenb~pg ~lnsu3 6C:: .
-
SSIf!P3W poo'l.Joq'l:J!<JN IV p31V;Jd<JN
UA\O~ P[O u1 ~YJeJl ~:>0l1 JO w~lQold gz .
-
S:JIf!];J3W poo'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<JltJ;Jd<JN
uO!JRllOdsueJl JO ~pow ~^!lew~lIe l~qlo pue l!SUell P~~N LC:: .
-
~U!I ~1~8UV SOl 'S' Alun~ :>8uelO '08~la ueS q1!M s~U!ll!SUell ~Un 9'l .
:>Idwex:> l:>S 01 AlP - ~P!Q~^ :>!l1~1~ JO ~sn ~8emo:>U3 sz: .
UO!lRlS UOHRllodsuelllepOW-!1Inw JOJ A1!UOllOddO :U01dx3 PC: .
sSIf!P<JW pOO'l.loq'l:J!<JN IV P<JltJ;JO<JN
OMO~ PIO U1 8up{Jed :uOW pue SlU~W~^OldW! uO!Je[n:>l!:> (>:)~N {;(; .
sSIf!P<JW POOlJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
-:>1:) 'speol p~^edun ':>YJell 01 :>np SU01l:>!l1~l ss:>:>:>e - s~wH ~suods~J ~:>lAJ~S :r.>!Iod pue ~l!d C:C:: .
sSIf!];J<JW POOIJ.loq'l:J!<JN IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
(esnp~w :)Iro -x:>) :>!IJell nJQl Aq p~sn 8u1~q Sl:>:>JlS [e:>OI lC: .
(8uPlleA\ u:UPI!Q:> JO Al:)Jes) Sl:>!IJuo:> :l!JJell/looq:>S OC:: .
UO!lCln;>.1I:J{UOn Cl.lod SUC.1.I
e;).JV l;);)fqnS A9: A.1eWWns S3nsSJ: WB[Z:O r 16/90/60
WC.1~O.ld ueld ltu3U~
VIf1:Jffi\I3:.I.!IO A.II:J
(
Bln~w~.L JO ^ 1
'}
"..,. j~l 8U!UURld ~q~
-
- -
uO!1eln:>l!~. ~lnOl )f:>0ll ~^!lew~lIe ^J!lU:>P1 - UA\Ol q8nOJtfl :>YJell )f:>0l1 P!ll~~ S[ .
-
S:JIf!];J;JW POOIJ.lOq'l:JPN IV p31v<Jd<JN
UOneln:>l!~- :)nss1 ,{l~]eS - lu~wdol:)^:)P AeA\-JO-lqg!l1~:U1S lU~S!SUO:>UI P[ .
-
UOne!O:>l!~. SlU:)W:)^OldW1 ~8ueq:>J:)lU!/peOl U1Rll~:> ~lel~l~:>:>e 01 P:>~N [[ .
-
s:Jlf!];Ja W pOOIJ.loqqS!;J N IV p31tJ;Jd<JN
('81S PI:)g.I:)nng JO U01SU~lX~
uone{rol1~' 'e:>Je )fmd SS~U!snq ~ql q8noJQlle!l:)lJe A\~U 'Rl!Je8Jew JO OOlSU~lX:)) SlOp!JlO:> uonRllodsuell qlnos!Qllou P:>:)N Z[ .
s:JIf!];J;J W pOOIJ.loqqSp N IV p<Jlv<Jd<JN
ue[d uO!lRlO~W:>ldwI
uO!leln:>lD. Slq8!1 :>gJell JO UO!lRZ1UOl:>uAS P:>~N I[ .
luaw313: dD uopeln:>.1I:J/UoIl8l.lod sue.I.L
e3.1V P3fqnS A9: A.1CWWnS s3nsSJ: WBfZ:01 16/90/60
W1U~O.1d uCld l1U;)U~
Vlfl:Jffi\I3:.L .{ 0 A.II:J
"-
)
8
e. .~~
I
~ i
;;ii
...~........ J.....~..............
Q .~~
I~
I
J>>
i
')
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 1
Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Open Space and Conservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 16
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Noise
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 23
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Public Facilities/Service Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Growth Management .................................".............. 31
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 34
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Community Design ........................................"........ 36
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Economic Development .............................................. 42
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
Safety Issues ..................................................... 46
Summary of Issues
Goals and Policies
THE PLANNlNG CENTER
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
INTRODUCTION
The Goals and Policies Workbook is intended to assist City officials in formulating the goals and
policies for the Temecula General Plan. The Workbook contains preliminary goals and policies
based on issues identified through research on the community, public workshops, intelViews with
City officials, and meetings with City staff. The Workbook organizes the preliminary goals and
policies by the elements of the General Plan. In addition to preliminary policies, the elements
contain "policy ideas" which are in italics. The "policy ideas" will be formulated into policy
statements upon further direction from City officials. A summary of the issues relevant to each
element is also provided for reference. For a detailed listing of the issues identified to date, see
The City of Temecula General Plan Program, Issues Summary by Subject Area dated September
6, 1991.
The identification of issues and the formulation of goals and policies is a significant step in the
preparation of the General Plan for Temecula. The issues represent the opportunities and
constraints that should be addressed in the General Plan. The goal is an overall statement of the
desires of the community. It is a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve in the
future. Policies represent a course of action or approach that is intended to achieve an overall
goal. A policy may relate to one or more goals. When adopted, a policy selVes as a guide to
the decisionmakers in reviewing development proposals and making other decisions that may
affect the development of the City.
The Goals and Policies Workbook is designed for you to easily write in your ideas, comments,
and suggestions. When reviewing this document, please respond using the following as a guide:
1. Clarify (C) - The sentence or phrase needs clarification.
2. Delete (D) - The sentence or phrase should be deleted.
3. Modify (M) - The sentence or phase needs modification. (Provide suggested language
or ideas on how to modify).
4. Add (A) - A new goal or policy should be added. The Workbook provides space for you
to add goal and policy statements.
If you encounter statements in this Workbook that warrant one of the above responses, please
note the appropriate letter (C,D,M,or A) in the margin and write clarifying ideas between the text
or on the back of the page to make sure we understand your point.
THE PLANNING CENTER
1
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF lAND USE ISSUES
The impact of future development on the existing rural residential areas and areas of historic
significance is of critical importance to many residents. It has been suggested that the City take
a proactive role in preserving the rural character of certain areas in the community through
sensitive land use planning, site and building design standards, and sufficient buffering
requirements. The preservation and enhancement of Old Town is also a priority to many
residents. The future Master Plan for Old Town should provide for better pedestrian access,
additional public parking, design standards for renovation or new development of commercial
uses, consistent streetscape design, and protection from encroachment by incompatible land uses.
The possibility of mixed use development in Old Town should be explored in the General Plan
process. In general, compatibility between land uses is a major issue.
The development of high density housing is another land use issue in terms of its concentration
and location in the community and impacts to public services (e.g. schools). There is a general
consensus that high density housing (both for-sale and rental units) should be dispersed rather
than concentrated in one area of the community. The quality of site and building design and the
provision of adequate open space/recreation facilities in higher density projects is of major
concern. Many residents desire a better mix or range of residential uses in the community.
Commercial uses should be located conveniently to neighborhoods with continuous
trails/sidewalks connecting the areas.
The overall land use mix in the community should provide for more open space and recreational
uses. There is concern that new development is not sufficiently providing parks and open space.
In addition, the community lacks regional recreation/cultural facilities. The desire among
residents for a permanent location to hold special community or regional events is linked to a
desire to enhance community identity.
Residents are also concerned about the impacts on the City (in terms of traffic, noise, air quality,
development pressures on agricultural or rural residential areas, etc.) from the possible expansion
of the French Valley Airport and the commercial/industrial development of the surrounding land.
Residents desire a stronger job base, but want environmental impacts minimized and public health
and safety protected.
There is general agreement that the quality of commercial development should be improved
through establishment of design standards. Furthermore, the lack of continuous sidewalks or
trails makes it difficult to walk to shopping areas and necessitates the use of cars for short trips.
Many residents want the development of strip commercial uses limited, preferring larger
commercial nodes. The need for a single "town center" does not appear to be an issue.
Residents are more interested in the opportunities for existing commercial centers to be upgraded
or enhanced, to function as community gathering places.
THE PLANNING CENTER
2
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 1:
DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
A complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, cultural and public land uses.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
Policy 1.6
Policy 1.7
GOAL 2:
Review all proposed development plans for consistency with the
community goals, policies and implementation programs of this General
Plan.
Promote the use innovative site planning techniques that contribute towards
the development of a variety of residential product styles and designs
including housing suitable to the community's labor force.
Require the development of unified or clustered community-level and
neighborhood-level commercial centers and limit development of strip
commercial uses.
Consider the impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure when
reviewing proposals for new development.
Support the development of industrial, manufacturing and office uses to
diversify Temecula's economic base.
A City of diversified development character where rural and historical areas
are protected and co-exist with newer urban development.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Provide physical and visual buffers areas to create a transition between
rural residential/agricultural areas and commercial, industrial and higher
density residential development.
Apply rural development standards to specified areas of the City to
maintain the rural character of those areas.
THE PLANNING CENTER
3
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 2.3
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
GOAL 3:
Encourage the revitalization of Old Town through the Old Town Master
Plan.
A City from which is compatible and coordinated with regional land use
patterns.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
GOAL 4:
Provide a pattern of land uses that maintain and enhance the viability of
neighboring communities through compatible uses and linkages.
A land use pattern that will protect and enhance residential neighborhoods.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.3
Consider land use compatibility, noise, traffic and other environmental
conditions in the location of residential land uses.
Provide infill development incentives in the Old Town area.
Require parcels developed for commercial or industrial uses to incorporate
buffers that minimize the impacts of noise, light, visibility of activity and
vehicular traffic on surrounding residential uses.
THE PLANNING CENTER
4
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 4.4
Policy 4.5
GOAL 5:
Community gathering areas which provide for the social, civic, cultural and
recreational needs of the community.
Policy 5.1
Policy 5.2
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
Policy 5.5
Policy 5.6
GOAL 6:
Encourage the development of public spaces or plazas within commercial
developments that can accommodate cultural and social events and
function as community gathering areas.
Encourage the development of multi-purpose facilities within commercial
developments that may be leased for a variety of public and private events.
Encourage the development of a range of uses within commercial
developments that provide for day and evening activities.
Encourage development of common areas and facilities within residential
developments to provide gathering areas for social and recreational
activities.
A development pattern that preserves and enhances the environmental
resources of the City.
Policy 6.1
Apply hillside grading standards to naturalize the effects of grading,
require the preservation of unique natural features and to encourage a
broad range of hillside architectural and site planning solutions.
THE PLANNING CENTER
5
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 6.2
Policy 6.3
Policy 6.4
Policy 6.S
GOAL 7:
Consider the constraints of natural and man-made hazards in determining
the location, type and intensities of new development
Cooperate with other agencies to adopt the Multi-species Habitat
Conservation Plan.
A land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages transit,
bicycle, pedestrian and other non-auto mobility options.
Policy 7.1
Policy 7.2
Policy 7.3
Policy 7.4
Require the provision of pedestrian and bicycle linkages from residential
areas to open space/recreation facilities, commercial and employment
centers.
Encourage higher density residential and mixed use development adjacent
to commercial centers.
THE PLANNING CENTER
6
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF CIRCULATION ISSUES
One of the most challenging issues associated with the General Plan is the correlation of the
Land Use Element building densities and intensities with Circulation Element capacity. There
is a need to maintain a balance between the development allowed (and associated traffic
demands) in the Land Use Element with the capacity of the Circulation Element's ultimate
system. Requirements for phasing development with circulation improvements is an important
component in maintaining this balance.
In general, there are a significant number of existing roadways including Margarita Road, Diaz
Road, Ynez Road and State Route 79 that are not yet constructed to ultimate planned capacity.
The piecemeal development of the circulation system is causing overloading of some arterials and
use of local streets to access certain parts of town. This also results in a discontinuity in
sidewalk improvements which discourages pedestrian travel. The timing of these improvements
is critical to the overall efficiency of the circulation system. The extension of Margarita Road
(to Winchester Road) and the construction of Butterfield Stage Road (between Rancho California
Road and Nicolas Road) would relieve congestion on Ynez Road and portions of Winchester
Road. These improvements are heavily influenced by the development timing of several large
landholdings adjacent to the roadways.
Calle Medusa, a two-lane local road, is currently experiencing significant through traffic volumes
due to the lack of a North/South corridor in the area. Residents are concerned about the safety
problems that such traffic creates, particularly at peak periods of the day. There is also the need
for a North/South corridor on the west side of the City, parallel to the freeway. It is important
that an alignment for this arterial be established while opportunities for acquisition or dedication
of right-of-way still exist. Additional access is also needed over 1-15 between Rancho California
Road and Winchester Road. Both interim and significant long-term improvements are required
to accommodate traffic volumes at the Rancho California Road interchange and Winchester Road
interchange. The Date Street overpass/interchange in Murrieta is also an important component
of the future circulation system, however, its design approval by Caltrans, funding, and
implementation are issues to be resolved.
Other circulation issues include the need for traffic signals at numerous intersections and signal
synchronization, the lack of public transit opportunities, and the lack of bike routes within the
City. Residents are interested in a bike system that links major commercial and employment
centers with residential areas. In addition, bike trails should link to regional trails and connect
parks, education institutions and recreation facilities. As part of the General Plan, there is a need
to develop roadway standards for both urban and rural roads in the community and identify the
locations where the different standards are to be applied.
Many of the improvements currently required will have Citywide and/or regional benefit and may
need to be constructed prior to the development of contiguous property. The City should develop
alternative funding mechanisms to pay for the improvements in a timely manner. Such
alternatives include implementation of an off-site Road Fee Program for new development,
Assessment/Community Facilities District for improvements not included in existing Districts,
gas tax monies, and Measure A revenues.
THE PLANNING CENTER
7
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DRAFT CIRCULATION ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
A street network that moves people and goods safely and efficiently
throughout the Study Area.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
GOAL 2:
Maintain a minimum Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections
during peak hours to ensure that traffic delays are kept to a minimum.
Require the construction of new road facilities to meet City standards and
the upgrading of existing road facilities to meet City standards where
feasible.
Require adequate evaluation of potential traffic impacts associated with
new development prior to project approval, and require appropriate
mitigation measures prior to, or concurrent with, project development.
A regional transportation system that accommodates the safe and efficient
movement of people and goods to and from the community.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Policy 2.3
Policy 2.4
Support the completion of the Riverside County Master Plan of Arterial
Highways.
Actively pursue the construction of a new interchange at Date Street in
cooperation with Caltrans and the City of Murrieta.
Actively pursue improvements to existing interchanges within the City and
construction of new overpasses as required to achieve the adopted service
level standards.
THE PLANNING CENTER
8
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 2.5
GOAL 3:
An efficient City circulation system through the use of transportation system
management and demand management strategies.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Policy 3.5
Policy 3.6
GOAL 4:
Provide a comprehensive system of Class I and/or Class II bicycle lanes
to meet the needs of cyclists travelling to and from work and other
destinations within the City.
Require specific plan projects and other mixed use project to provide an
internal system of trails linking schools, shopping centers and other public
facilities with residential areas.
Encourage the implementation of employer Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) requirements included in the Southern California Air
Quality Management District's Regulation 15 of the Air Quality
Management Plan.
Encourage the provision of additional regional public transportation
services and support facilities, including park-and-ride lots near the 1-15
freeway.
An adequate supply of private and public parking to meet the needs of
residents and visitors to the City.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Require the consolidation of parking, where appropriate, to minimize the
number of ingress and egress points onto arterials.
Provide additional public prking in the Old Town area when feasible
through common parking a:eas or establishment of a parking district.
THE PLANNING CENTER
9
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 4.3
Policy 4.4
Policy 4.5
GOAL 5:
Policy 5.1
Policy 5.2
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
GOAL 6:
Require project developers to provide adequate on-site parking and/or to
contribute to a program to acquire and maintain off-site facilities.
Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City.
Promote the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by adhering to uniform
trail standards and practices and communicating safety practices to the
public.
Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled.
A truck circulation system that provides for the safe and efficient transport
of commodities and also minimizes noise and traffic impacts to the City.
Policy 6.1
Policy 6.2
Designate primary truck routes on selected arterial streets to minimize the
impacts of truck traffic on residential areas.
Require loading areas and access ways for trucks that minimize or eliminate
conflicts with efficient traffic circulation.
THE PLANNING CENTER
10
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 6.3
Policy 6.4
THE PLANNING CENTER
11
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF HOUSING ISSUES
There is a need to maintain the existing stock of affordable housing in Temecula, particularly for
senior citizens and first time home buyers. The community as a whole can benefit from a better
mix of residential types and densities provided that there are guidelines for improved site design
and development, provision of open space and buffering between land uses.
A major housing issue in Temecula is the concentration and condition of existing high density
development in the community. In particular, the concentration and degradation of attached or
higher density housing along Margarita Road and Pujol Street is of concern to many residents.
Potential improvements to these areas include additional open space and recreation facilities,
rehabilitation of structures, stricter code enforcement, and additional police enforcement activities.
There is general agreement that higher density housing should be better distributed/integrated in
the community and more accessible to commercial services. The City should also establish
design standards that encourage more innovative design solutions and higher quality development
of multi-family housing (see Summary of Community Design Issues for further discussion).
The number of homeless people living in the Murrieta Creek bed and elsewhere in the City is
a growing problem. The City may address this issue by assisting non-profit organizations that
provide food and shelter.
THE PLANNING CENTER
12
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 1:
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
A diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physica~ social and
economic needs of existing and future residents of the Study Area.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
Policy 1.6
Policy 1.7
GOAL 2:
Provide an inventory of land sufficient to accommodate the existing and
projected housing needs at varying densities in the City.
Encourage development of diverse housing opportunities that vary in cost,
density and type.
Support the use of innovative site design and architectural style In
residential development.
Provide reasonable processing time and fees for new construction or
rehabilitation of housing.
Ensure the timely and equitable provision of public facilities and services
to accommodate residential development.
Maintain and enhance existing residential areas.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Policy 2.3
Conserve the existing, affordable rental housing throughout the City
including dwelling occupied by households assisted through the local, state
or federal programs.
Promote the continued maintenance and enhancement of the existing
housing stock.
THE PLANNING CENTER
13
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 2.4
GOAL 3:
Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low and
moderate income households.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Policy 3.5
GOAL 4:
Support innovative public, private and non-profit efforts in the
development of affordable housing, particularly for lower income
households, the elderly, single parent households and persons with special
needs.
Utilize market-based incentives to encourage development of housing
opportunities affordable to low and moderate income households.
Pursue all available forms of local, state and federal assistance to support
development and implementation of housing programs.
Removal of governmental constraints in the maintenance, improvement and
development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination
in the lending, sale or rental of housing.
THE PLANNING CENTER
14
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 4.3
GOAL 5:
Housing development that incorporates energy conservation features or
energy efficient design concepts.
Policy 5.1
Encourage the incorporation of energy conselVation features in the design
of all new construction.
Policy 5.2
Encourage the use of active and passive design concepts that use the
natural environment to increase energy efficiency.
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
THE PLANNING CENTER
15
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ISSUES
A pressing issue to many residents is the lack of community level and neighborhood level parks.
In general, parkland should be better distributed to serve all residential areas in the City and
should primarily consist of useable acreage for active recreation (e.g. sports fields, tennis and
basketball courts, tot lots, etc.). Opportunities to improve or expand existing parkland should be
pursued by the City. In terms of park facilities, the City should consider the recreation needs of
older children and teenagers.
Residents also express the need for a comprehensive bikeway/multipurpose trail system that
connects to the regional trail system and to the trails or bikeways of adjacent communities. The
bikeways should function both as a recreational activity and as an alternative form of travel,
linking residential areas to open space, commercial uses and employment areas. The City should
pursue the joint use of utility easements and flood control lands for trails and recreation areas.
The preservation of significant open space features in the area is a major concern to residents.
The southwestern ridge line and hillside area of the Santa Margarita Mountains, Temecula Creek
and adjacent floodplain area and the vineyards are part of the community's open space image.
The remaining natural open space areas also contain rare and endangered wildlife and plant
species that must be protected from the impacts of growth and development. There is a need for
well defined hillside grading and development standards that result in the preservation of
significant features and biological resources, and development that blends with the natural terrain
(see the Summary of Community Design Issues for further discussion). Although the Wine
Country is outside the City limits and sphere of influence, the wineries are important to the City
in terms of trade, tourism, and the image and character of the area. The impacts of growth in
Temecula on the long-term viability of the vineyards area is an important issue to the community.
THE PLANNING CENTER
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 1:
DRAFT OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT
A high quality parks and recreation system that meets the varying
recreational needs of residents.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
Policy 1.6
GOAL 2:
Apply the standards contained in the City's Park and Recreation Master
Plan to acquire sufficient parkland and improvements to support new
development.
Require developers of residential projects greater than fifty dwelling units
to dedicate land based on the park acre standard of five (5) acres to one
thousand (1,000) population, or the payment of in lieu fees.
Pursue the joint use of public lands available and suitable for recreation
purposes including lands under the jurisdiction of the Riverside County
Flood Control District, Southern California Edison, water districts and
other public agencies.
Consider the enhancement and preservation of significant natural features
including, riparian areas, rock outcroppings, sensitive habitat areas and
viewpoints through park design and site development.
Consider public safety and compatibility with adjacent use in park design
and development, including location of buildings, activity areas, lighting
and parking.
Conservation and protection of surface water, groundwater and imported
water resources.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Protect natural drainage courses.
Protect groundwater.
THE PLANNING CENTER
17
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 2.3
Regulate lands adjacent to waterways.
Policy 2.4
Erosion control.
GOAL 3:
Conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and
animal species of concern.
Policy 3.1
Bio resource mitigation.
Policy 3.2
Bio assessments in specified areas.
Policy 3.3
-
Policy 3.4
GOAL 4:
Conservation of energy resources through the use of available technology and
conservation practices.
Policy 4.1
THE PLANNING CENTER
18
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 4.2
GOAL 5:
Preservation of open space areas for recreation, scenic enjoyment, and
protection of natural resources and features.
Policy 5.1
Policy 5.2
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
Policy 5.5
Policy 5.6
Policy 5.7
Maintain slopes viewed from arterials.
Preserve western ridge line and slopes.
Dedication of open space with significant resources.
Preserve scenic views.
Improve quality of landscaping.
Adequate open space in multi-family developments.
Revegetation of graded areas.
THE PLANNING CENTER
19
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 5.8
Linkage of open space/recreation areas.
Policy 5.9
Policy 5.10
GOAL 6: Preservation of significant historical and cultural resources.
Policy 6.1 Survey for archaeo and paleo resources.
Policy 6.2
Preservation of sites or mitigation of impact prior to development.
Policy 6.3
Encourage preservation and reuse of historical buildings.
Policy 6.4
Consider acquisition and preservation of historical buildings.
Policy 6.5
Compatibility of new construction adjacent to historic building areas.
THE PLANNING CENTER
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 6.6
Policy 6.7
Policy 6.8
GOAL 7:
Inventory of historical resources in City.
Protection of prime agricultural land from premature conversion to
urbanized uses.
Policy 7.1
Policy 7.2
Policy 7.3
Policy 7.4
Policy 7.5
Protect agricultural uses and lands through land use policies and
standards.
THE PLANNING CENTER
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 8:
A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs.
Policy 8.1
Policy 8.2
THE PLANNING CENTER
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF NOISE ISSUES
Residents are primarily concerned about transportation related noise sources. Noise impacts on
residential areas are generated from major arterials, collector roadways and aircraft operations
from the French Valley Airport. Residential areas and other noise sensitive receptors must be
protected from excessive noise from both transportation related and non-transportation related
sources. Non-transportation sources include industrial activities and equipment, and construction
activities. Noise impacts are most effectively controlled through the adoption and application of
a City Noise Ordinance.
THE PLANNING CENTER
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
NOISE ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
Reduction of noise impacts from transportation noise sources where the noise
environment is unacceptable.
Policy 1.1
Mitigate noise impacts of existing development
Policy 1.2
Speed control on local streets.
Policy 1.3
Ensure acceptable noise levels for new development.
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.S
GOAL 2:
Consideration of noise impacts in land use planning and design.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
THE PLANNING CENTER
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 3:
Control of noise from significant noise generators in the community.
Limit construction hours in residential areas.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
THE PLANNING CENTER
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC FACILITY/SERVICE ISSUES
The rate of growth in Temecula in recent years has spurred a number of issues relative to the
provision of adequate public facilities and services. There is a need to better quantify the impacts
of new development and assure that new development provides its fair share of public
infrastructure and services in a timely manner. The new City of Temecula has also inherited
from the county some existing deficiencies in infrastructure and services. The City should
continue to explore all potential funding sources to correct deficiencies and prioritize the
implementation of improvements through the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Program. In
general, there is a need for better coordination with local jurisdictions, the county, and regional
districts when planning and implementing public improvements.
Residents are concerned about the current level of fire protection. Access restrictions, due to
traffic and the condition of unpaved roads, lengthen response times for fires and other
emergencies. New facilities should be constructed and operational to serve new development.
The City should work with the county to assure acceptable response times in new and existing
developed areas of the community. The current level of crime prevention services is generally
considered adequate, however, additional enforcement efforts are needed in the Old Town area.
The quality of the school system is largely dependent on adequate funding for construction and
maintenance of school facilities and the dedication of appropriate school sites to accommodate
new residential development. There may also be the need for a junior college or a four-year
college in the community.
The long term supply of water to meet increases in demand is a major issue. The City should
work closely with the Rancho California Water District (RCWD) in developing supply options,
particularly the use of reclaimed water, and ensuring that development does not outpace the long
term availability of water.
THE PLANNING CENTER
26
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DRAFT PUBLIC FACILITY/SERVICE ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
Effective and cost efficient sheriff, fIre and emergency medical service within
the City.
Policy 1.1
Standard of 1 officer/I, 000 population for sheriff service.
Policy 1.2
Incorporate defensible space techniques in building design.
Policy 1.3
Standard for fire response time by type of land use?
Policy 1.4
Promote neighborhood watch program.
GOAL 2:
A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to
educate the youth of Temecula.
Policy 2.1
Consider adequacy of schools in development review process.
Policy 2.2
Coordinate land use planning with school facility planning.
Policy 2.3
Consider all available mitigation measures for impacts to schools.
THE PLANNING CENTER
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
GOAL 3:
A range of community services and cultural facilities that meet the needs of
Temecula residents and enhances their quality of life.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Policy 3.5
Policy 3.6
Acquisition of a civic hall site.
Encourage volunteerism.
Require child care facilities or an in lieu fee as part of all new
commercial and industrial development.
Development of a senior citizens center.
Encourage development of cultural facilities.
THE PLANNING CENTER
28
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 3.7
GOAL 4:
A water and wastewater infrastructure system that supports existing and
future development in the Study Area.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.3
Policy 4.4
Policy 4.5
Policy 4.6
Support water conservation.
Use of reclaimed water.
Require demonstration of adequate water and wastewater capacity prior
to approval of new development.
Assist water districts in analyzing capacity/supply requirements.
THE PLANNING CENTER
29
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 5:
A solid waste management system that provides for the safe and efficient
collection, transportation, recovery and disposal of solid wastes.
Policy 5.1
Policy 5.2
GOAL 6:
Adequate electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication systems to meet the
demand of new and existing development.
Policy 6.1
Policy 6.2
THE PLANNING CENTER
30
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Growth management is the act of influencing, guiding and directing the physical growth of an
area by local governments. The key factor distinguishing growth management from other types
of planning is its deliberate intent to alter or influence the rate, amount, quality, and public
obligations associated with growth. Growth management may entail establishment of: special
requirements for phasing of development and public improvements; limits within which growth
can occur for a prescribed period of time; special standards for development within certain areas;
incentives for some kinds of development and restrictions on others; programs to stimulate
growth at certain times; and systems and procedures for administering the growth management
programs.
Issues within Temecula that will influence the strategies or approach to growth management, and
the tools to be used include the current lagging of infrastructure improvements to serve new
development; financing of infrastructure improvements; lack of transition and land use conflicts
between urbanized and rural areas; development pressures in rural areas; and the potential
annexation of the French Valley Airport and its surrounding area. There is also a need to ensure
a strong fiscal foundation for the City and a reliable long-term water supply. The current high
vacancy rate in the industrial and commercial market has caused some residents to believe that
the rate of growth in Temecula is too fast. The impact of growth in the City on the Wine
Country is also issue given the importance of the vineyard areas to tourism and to the image of
the City.
THE PLANNING CENTER
31
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DRAFT GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
A long range vision for the physical development of the Study Area that
results in an orderly and efficient patterns of growth.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
GOAL 2:
Support creative approaches to land use planning that minimize public
service costs and environmental impacts through the interrelationship of
land uses, circulation and open space elements.
Encourage new development that helps to create and maintain a balance
between jobs and housing opportunities
Sufficient levels of service for public infrastructure and services including
traffic, sheriff service, fIre service, and parks and recreation facilities.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Policy 2.3
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
Ensure that needed public facilities are provided concurrently with need.
Manage growth at a rate that is in phase with the City's capacity to
provide the desired level of public services and facilities.
Require new development to pay an equitable share of the costs of needed
public facilities and improvements.
THE PLANNING CENTER
32
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 3:
Interjurisdictional regional coordination and cooperation on regional growth
management issues.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
GOAL 4:
Cooperate with local-serving utility districts to effectively manage future
service demands.
Support the efforts of appropriate regional agencies and utility districts for
water conservation and developing and using reclaimed water.
Maintain or enhance the environmental quality of the community.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.4
Policy 4.5
Identify and protect the natural environmental resources of the community.
Encourage the provision of open space within and between new residential
and commercial development projects.
Cooperate with appropriate regional and state agencies to preserve the air
quality within the Temecula Valley area.
THE PLANNING CENTER
33
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF AIR QUALITY ISSUES
The City of Temecula is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently does not attain the
state and federal standards for ozone, respirable particulates, carbon monoxide and nitrogen
dioxide. The City is required to implement those measures that will further regional air quality
objectives as contained in the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan. The most challenging issues
confronting the City are the identification of the most cost effective and efficient Control
Measures to reduce air pollutant emissions, and the effective implementation of the Control
Measures. Coordination with the County is an important component in addressing these issues.
In addition, the City has the opportunity to provide leadership in reducing employee-related air
pollutant emissions. Continued sponsorship of the City-wide recycling program and
implementation of new programs including ridesharing among City employees, flextime, and the
provision of on-site childcare and other services are options the City may consider.
THE PLANNING CENTER
34
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DRAFT AIR QUALITY ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
Improved air quality in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality
Management Plan.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
GOAL 2:
Reduction of air pollutant eIDlSSlons to the greatest extent feasible by
mitigating air quality impacts associated with development projects.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
GOAL 3:
Implementation of control measures which apply to Temecula as an employer
and contractor.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
THE PLANNING CENTER
35
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY DESIGN ISSUES
One of the most pressing community design issues is the need to develop design guidelines for
use by project proponents and City officials. There is general agreement that the quality of site
planning, architecture and landscape architecture needs to be improved with future development
and alterations to existing development. Comprehensive design guidelines would provide a
framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the City. The guidelines
should encourage a public/private dialogue whereby creative and innovative design solutions may
be realized. The application of design guidelines to both residential and non-residential uses
needs to be resolved.
Many residents are concerned about the height and bulk of some of the newer commercial/office
structures in the City. Larger commercial projects need to consider the relationship of the
buildings to the pedestrian and surrounding environment. Standards need to be carefully
developed for the Zoning Code to achieve a scale of development that is in balance with the area.
It is important that land use and development decisions capitalize on and maintain the natural
assets of a given location. Incorporation of significant natural features in development results
in a more enjoyable and satisfying urban environment. The transition between the urbanized
areas and rural areas is particularly important in creating a cohesive image of the community.
The preservation of the remaining" hillsides and ridgelines of the Study Area is particularly
important to many residents. There is a need for hillside development standards that encourage
innovative site and building design to enhance the visual quality of development and preserve
significant natural features or special habitat areas. The City also has the opportunity to create
a positive urban design element with enhancement and linkage between its parks, water features
and other open space lands.
The lack of a unified or functional streets cape along major arterials is another issue to be
addressed in the Community Design Element. Streetscapes are important image-building
components that offer immediate and lasting impressions of the community. Streets capes are also
important in encouraging pedestrian activity and in defining neighborhoods or districts. The City
may consider implementing a streetscape program of median and parkway landscaping, street
lighting, graphics, etc. to provide orientation to visitors and unify the City.
THE PLANNING CENTER
36
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DRAFf COMM:UNITY DESIGN ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
Enhancement of the City's image related to its regional and natural setting
and its tourist orientation.
Policy 1.1
Create open space network connecting parks, schools, etc.
Policy 1.2
Commercial development to enhance visual identity.
Policy 1.3
Implementation of Old Town Master Plan.
Policy 1.4
Visibility of commercial centers from 1-15.
Policy 1.5
Provide gateway signage at key entrances to the City.
Policy 1.6
Policy 1.7
THE PLANNING CENTER
37
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 2:
Design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and
signage in new development and modifications to existing development.
Policy 2.1
Application of design standards and guidelines for residential and non-
residential development.
Policy 2.2
Require preparation of specific plans for large undeveloped areas to
establish a cohesive and integrated pattern of development for that area.
Policy 2.3
Policy 2.4
GOAL 3:
Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts
or neighborhoods.
Policy 3.1
Strengthen neighborhood edges through landscaping, location of open
space, etc.
Policy 3.2
Transition in densities between rural areas and higher density
development.
THE PLANNING CENTER
38
CITY OF TEMECULA
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Policy 3.5
Policy 3.6
Policy 3.7
GOAL 4:
General Plan Program
Use of landscaping to create visual interest, reduce conflict between uses,
etc.
Identify business districts through unified streetscape.
Improve pedestrian orientation of commercial centers.
Development of a streetscape system that provides cohesiveness and enhances
community image.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Create a continuous sidewalk and bike trail network.
Visual continuity of trafficways through landscaping, lighting, and street
improvements.
THE PLANNING CENTER
39
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 4.3 Promote Citywide street tree and median/slope planting program.
Policy 4.4 Parkways between roads and sidewalks where feasible.
Policy 4.5 Revegetation of graded slopes.
Policy 4.6
Policy 4.7
GOAL 5:
Protection of public views of significant natural features.
Policy 5.1
Policy 5.2
THE PLANNING CENTER
40
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 6: Maintenance and enhancement of the City's public spaces and resources.
Policy 6.1 Install street furniture in high activity areas.
Policy 6.2
Policy 6.3
THE PLANNING CENTER
41
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
The economy in Temecula has been expanding very rapidly. This expansion provides job
opportunities and can help the City meet its fiscal goals. However, rapid expansion can also lead
to undesirable impacts on traffic and infrastructure capacity. The Temecula economy has shown
recent diversification in both manufacturing and services. Areas where additional diversification
is needed may include the financial sector; medical and health services; retail diversification -
particularly in general merchandise and apparel; and lodging, recreation and other visitor-oriented
servIces.
As Temecula grow, there will be a need to maintain a level of housing supply which is affordable
to workers in Temecula. This is important for several reasons. First, an improved jobs/housing
balance will reduce long-distance commuting, improve air quality, conserve energy, and enhance
the quality of life for Temecula residents. Second, a jobs/housing balance will increase the range
of choice for all Temecula residents. Third, a jobs/housing balance will make Temecula
attractive to both prospective residents and employers.
Given the economic realities in California, each local jurisdiction must maintain its own fiscal
viability. This will require a combination of land use policy, attraction of business, and local
revenue policy (including taxation). It must be recognized that dollars must be paid to provide
fiscal viability. In many cases, resident and business opposition to modest local taxes stems from
a lack of understanding as to how local revenues are generated. This learning process should be
part of the General Plan process.
There is an interdependence among economic issues. The high standards for community facilities
and services attract businesses and residents. This attraction generates revenues which makes
these high standards possible. There is an opportunity for Temecula to increase its attractiveness,
economic development and service levels through effective economic development strategies.
THE PLANNING CENTER
42
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
A strategy for economic development which attracts and retains business and
industrial uses and provides a broad range of employment opportunities.
Policy 1.1
Encourage the growth and expansion of local firms.
Policy 1.2
Encourage appropriate types of businesses to relocate to Temecula.
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
GOAL 2:
An economic base which provides a sound fIScal foundation for the City.
Policy 2.1
Encourage the growth or relocation of industries to Temecula that generate
local tax advantages.
Policy 2.2
Ensure timely proVIsIon of infrastructure and servIces with economic
development.
Policy 2.3
Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land
uses with other uses that have a negative fiscal impact upon the City.
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
THE PLANNING CENTER
43
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 3:
An economic development plan which fits well into the regional economy and
takes full advantage of the location of Temecula.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Policy 3.5
Optimize Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales from surrounding
communities.
Promote Temecula as a retailing center along the 1-15 corridor.
Develop opportunities for in.creased aviation services associated with
Temecula business and industry.
GOAL 4:
Commercial development that meets the diverse retail needs of the City.
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.3
Policy 4.4
Encourage the provision of additional health care services within the
community.
Encourage the development of additional retail space to accommodate the
general merchandise and apparel needs of the community.
THE PLANNING CENTER
44
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
GOAL 5:
Revitalization of Old Town to improve its attractiveness and accessibility, as
well as enhance its role in the local tourism trade.
Policy 5.1
Develop a consistent marketing theme for the Old Town area to expand its
image as a tourist destination point.
Policy 5.2
Encourage targeted businesses to locate in the Old Town area.
Policy 5.3
Encourage mixed-use development in the Old Town area if determined
economically viable.
Policy 5.4
Policy 5.5
THE PLANNING CENTER
45
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
SUMMARY OF SAFETY ISSUES
The major public safety issues in Temecula are flood hazards and seismic hazards. Portions of
Murrieta Creek and Temecula Creek are within the 100-year flood zone. Development within
the 100-year floodplains must comply with the floodproofing standards established by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The potential for flood damage to existing
development along Murrieta Creek needs to be mitigated by flood control improvements. In
addition, there is a concern about localized flooding in rural residential areas due to storm water
run-off from large scale development projects.
Seismic hazards in the study area include groundshaking, ground rupture, subsidence and
liquefaction from active faults and potentially active faults in the Elsinore Fault Zone and Agua
Caliente Fault Zone. Development in areas of poorly consolidated alluvial deposits and in areas
of high groundwater are subject to the most damage from these hazards.
Another important safety issue is the need to adopt an Emergency Response Plan and the need
to meet the requirements of the California Emergency Services Act of 1951. The Plan should
designate responsibilities to local personnel in the event of an emergency resulting from a natural
disaster. The city must also comply with the provisions of S.B. 477 (Greene, 1987) relating to
the adoption of a city hazardous waste management plan or adoption of the county's hazardous
waste management plan.
THE PLANNING CENTER
46
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
Protection from hazards associated with geologic instability, seismic events,
flooding, and hazardous materials.
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
GOAL 2:
Require review of soil and geologic conditions to determine stability prior
to the approval of development.
Ensure that seismic hazards are identified through the development review
process.
Require all new development to comply with the most recent Uniform
Building Code seismic design standards.
Maintain a Disaster Preparedness Plan to respond effectively to and recover
from a hazardous event.
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Policy 2.3
Coordinate with the County of Riverside and other appropriate agencies to
maintain a Disaster Preparedness Plan to provide effective response to an
emergency, minimize property damage in a disaster, and create citizen
awareness of evacuation routes and actions to be taken in the event of an
emergency.
Coordinate with Orange County and the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to reduce community risks in the event of a disaster.
THE PLANNING CENTER
47
CITY OF TEMECULA
General Plan Program
Policy 2.4
TEM-01IGOALS.DOC
THE PLANNING CENTER
48
r---'
The Economic FindingsandtlSUfl$8oQk1lt
. wasn()tavaH~ein time to be iAcluded witbih_,p~.r.
Stillf will provide additiOnal infortnatiGnat the.....'{
r'.
r---