HomeMy WebLinkAbout052517 PTS Agenda 'In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the
office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting 128 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title IIS
MEETING AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2017, 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Mann
ROLL CALL: Carter, Mann, Richardson, Sullivan, Hagel,
PRESENTATIONS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire
to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow"Request to Speak"
form may be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a"Request to Speak"form may be filed with the Recording Secretary
before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMISSION REPORTS
Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not
to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by
one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
1. Action Minutes of April 27, 2017
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of April 27, 2017.
.I
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Draft 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Annex
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
2.1 Receive and file the report
3. Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-2022
RECOMMENDATION-
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
3.1 Review and discuss the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Circulation and Infrastructure Projects for Fiscal Years 2018-2022.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on
Thursday, June 22,2017,at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center,City Council Chambers,41000
Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The agenda packet(including staff reports)will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,
Temecula)after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time,the agenda packet may also be accessed on the
City's website—www.cityolternccgla orp,—and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting,
Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda
Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda,after the posting of the agenda,will be
available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,Temecula,8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition,
such material may be accessed on the City's website—w%vw,cilrt[liztn.�T ila..org—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting.
If you have any questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting,please contact the Public Works Department at the Temecula Civic Center,
(951)694-6411.
2
ITEM NO. 1
Action Minutes of
April 27, 2017
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, APRIL 27, 2017, 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel (6 PM)
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Carter, Mann, Sullivan, Hagel
Absent: Commissioner Richardson
PRESENTATIONS: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Richard Hartman
COMMISSION REPORTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Action Minutes of March 23, 2017 —Approved staff recommendation (4-0-1-0) with
a motion made by Commissioner Sullivan and seconded by Commissioner Mann.
Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Carter,Mann,Sullivan and
Hagel; Commissioner Richardson was absent.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of March 23, 2017.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Signs — Amarita Way and Montele ro Way —
Approved staff recommendation (4-0-1-0) with a motion made by Commissioner
Sullivan and seconded by Commissioner Mann. Individual voice vote reflected
approval by Commissioners Carter, Mann, Sullivan and Hagel; Commissioner
Richardson was absent.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
2.1 Maintain the present level of control at the intersections of Amarita Way at
Santiago Road and Montelegro Way at Leena Way;
2.2 Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way
Stop Signs at the intersections of Amarita Way at Pio Pico Road and
Montelegro Way at McCabe Drive; and
2.3 Direct Staff to install advance Pedestrian Crossing signs at "trail head"
locations on Montelegro Way at Leena Way and Amarita Way at Santiago
Road.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT—The meeting adjourned at 6:41 PM with a motion made by Commissioner
Mann and seconded by Commissioner Sullivan.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on
Thursday, May 25, 2017,at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center,City Council Chambers,41000
Main Street, Temecula, California.
Bob Hagel Patrick Thomas
Chairperson Director of Public Works/City Engineer
2
ITEM NO. 2
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
(LHMP)
AGENDA REPORT Of Tr
c �
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission 1989
FROM: Roberto Cardenas, Fiscal Services Manager
DATE: May 25, 2017
SUBJECT: Item 2
Draft 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex
Prepared By: Roberto Cardenas, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
1. Receive and file the Report
BACKGROUND: The Disaster Mitigation and Cost Recovery Act of 2000 (DMA
2000) amended the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
by placing a new emphasis on hazard mitigation planning, primarily moving from post-
disaster mitigation to pre-disaster mitigation.
As part of DMA 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is now
responsible for coordinating the implementation of the act requiring local government,
state, and special jurisdictions to develop and maintain hazard mitigation plans. In order
to qualify for future hazard mitigation grants, each jurisdiction must prepare, and have
approved by the Federal Government a local hazard mitigation plan. A local hazard
mitigation plan must be approved every five years per DMA 2000. While the County of
Riverside is responsible for adopting the 2017 Riverside County Operational Area Multi-
Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the City of Temecula is responsible for
adopting the annex to the County's plan — more specifically, the 2017 City of Temecula
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex.
Riverside County's efforts to update the 2017 Riverside County Operational Area Multi-
Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan began in 2016. The goal was to bring all
members of the Riverside County Operational Area (county, cities, special district, and
tribes), along with local businesses and interested members of the public, together to
create a multi-jurisdictional plan that identifies and assesses the various hazards in the
entire County of Riverside. The desire was to have the County, along with the cities,
special districts, and tribes develop an all-inclusive plan, rather than have each city,
special district, and tribe develop their own plan.
The County of Riverside's current planning process evaluates the potential impact of
each identified hazard on the county, cities, special districts, and tribes. All participating
jurisdictions help establish a list of potential mitigation efforts (via their LHMP Annex)
and prioritize those efforts based on the needs of their jurisdiction. In addition, each
participating jurisdiction develops a specific hazard mitigation strategy based on
information from 2012 through 2017.
Final approval from FEMA requires a formal resolution from the City adopting the City of
Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex as a part of the City's hazard planning
process. The plan will be implemented upon FEMA approval.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan will
enable the City to maintain its eligibility for hazard mitigation grant funds from FEMA.
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A"— City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex (2017)
2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LOCAL HAZARD LITIGATION
PLAN ANNEX
[to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan)
r�
! rl f yy
w
CONTACT INFORMATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
Name: Roberto Cardenas
Title: Fiscal Services Manager
Address: 41000 Main St.
City, State and Zip: Temecula, CA 92590
Direct Contact: Roberto Cardenas
Phone 951-693-3944
Fax: 951-302-4159
Email: Roberto.Cardenas@temeculaCA.gov
1
PLAN ADOPTION/RESOLUTION
The City of Temecula (City) will submit the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex
(LHMP Annex) to the Riverside County Emergency Management Department (EMD) for review
and approval. EMD will, in turn, forward the LHMP Annex to the California Governor's Office of
Emergency Services (Cal OES) for review and approval. Cal OES will, in turn, submit the LHMP
Annex to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for review and approval. The
City will wait to receive an "Approval Pending Adoption" letter from FEMA before taking the plan
to the City's local governing body (City Council) for adoption. Upon approval, the City will insert
the signed resolution into the LHMP Annex.
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Disaster Mitigation and Cost Recovery Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) amended the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by placing a new emphasis on hazard mitigation planning,
primarily moving from post-disaster mitigation to pre-disaster mitigation.
As part of DMA 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is now responsible for
coordinating the implementation of the act requiring local government, state, and special jurisdictions to
develop and maintain hazard mitigation plans. In order to qualify for future hazard mitigation grants, each
jurisdiction must prepare, and have approved by the Federal Government a local hazard mitigation plan.
A local hazard mitigation plan must be approved every five years per DMA 2000. While the County of
Riverside is responsible for adopting the 2017 Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the City of Temecula is responsible for adopting the annex to the County's
plan — more specifically, the 2017 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex.
Riverside County's efforts to update the 2017 Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan began in 2016. The goal was to bring all members of the Riverside County
Operational Area (county, cities, special district, and tribes), along with local businesses and interested
members of the public, together to create a multi-jurisdictional plan that identifies and assesses the
various hazards in the entire County of Riverside. The desire was to have the County, along with the
cities, special districts, and tribes develop an all-inclusive plan, rather than have each city, special district,
and tribe develop their own plan.
The County of Riverside's current planning process evaluated the potential impact of each identified
hazard on the county, cities, special districts, and tribes. All participating jurisdictions helped establish a
list of potential mitigation efforts (via their LHMP Annex) and prioritized those efforts based on the needs
of their jurisdiction. In addition, each participating jurisdiction developed a specific hazard mitigation
strategy based on information from 2012 through 2017.
Final approval from FEMA requires a formal resolution from the City adopting the City of Temecula Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex as a part of the City's hazard planning process. The plan will be
implemented upon FEMA approval.
3
TABLE OF CONTENT
CONTACTINFORMATION....................................................................................................................... 1
PLAN ADOPTION/RESOLUTION.............................................................................................................2
EXECUTIVESUMMARY..........................................................................................................................3
TABLEOF CONTENT..............................................................................................................................4
SECTION 1.0 - COMMUNITY PROFILE...................................................................................................6
1.1 CITY MAP...............................................................................................................................6
1.2 GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................7
1.3 BRIEF HISTORY.....................................................................................................................7
1.4 ECONOMY DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................7
1.5 POPULATION AND HOUSING...............................................................................................9
1.6 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND LAND USE ........................................................................ 10
SECTION 2.0 - PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................................................. 11
2.1 LOCAL PLANNING PROCESS............................................................................................. 11
2.2 PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL (OA) PLANNING PROCESS ............................................. 11
2.3 DATES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT..................................................................... 11
2.4 PLANS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION .................................................................................. 12
SECTION 3.0 - MITIGATION ACTIONS/UPDATES............................................................................... 12
3.1 UPDATES FROM 2012 PLAN............................................................................................... 12
3.2 LIST OF COUNTY AND CITY HAZARDS ............................................................................. 12
3.3 NEW HAZARDS OR CHANGES FROM 2012....................................................................... 12
3.4 BRIEF STATEMENT OF UNIQUE HAZARDS....................................................................... 12
3.5 MITIGATION PROJECT UPDATES...................................................................................... 12
SECTION 4.0 - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................ 13
4.1 CRITICAL FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURES.............................................................. 13
4.2 ESTIMATING POTENTIAL LOSS......................................................................................... 13
4.3 TABLE REPLACEMENT VALUES........................................................................................ 13
4.4 IDENTIFICATION OF RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES........................................................ 14
SECTION 5.0 -COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM .................................................................................. 18
5.1 REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES....................................................................................... 18
5.2 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROPERTIES ................................................................. 18
SECTION 6.0 - CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT....................................................................................... 19
6.1 REGULATORY MITIGATION CAPABILITIES....................................................................... 19
ReviewedAnnually .................................................................................................. ..............................20
6.2 ADMINISTRATIVE/TECHNICAL MITIGATION CAPABILITIES.............................................20
6.3 FISCAL MITIGATION CAPABILITIES...................................................................................21
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION STRATEGIES...........................................................................................22
7.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 22
7.2 MITIGATION ACTIONS ........................................................................................................ 23
7.3 ON-GOING MITIGATION STRATEGY PROGRAMS ............................................................ 23
7.4 FUTURE MITIGATION STRATEGIES ..................................................................................24
SECTION 8.0 - PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCESS........................................ 24
SECTION 9.0 - INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANNING MECHANISMS.................................. 24
SECTION 10.0 - CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT........................................................................ 25
APPENDIX A- PUBLIC NOTICES AND MAPS ..................................................................................... 26
............................................................................................................................................................... 28
APPENDIXB - ................................................................................................................. 29
4
SECTION 1.0 - COMMUNITY PROFILE
1.1 CITY MAP
Figure 1-1: City of Temecula Map
Legend
M a r r r,t ti 4 Highways
t . INTERCHANGE
�•` - - INTERSTATE
�-. J* 4. �"� r .� OFFRAMP
ONRAMP
If r � 1 � usHwr
f '; City of Temecula Boundary
r
i • ; Sphere of Influence
' 1. •y ,.« ; ,, t �. Creeks
Open Space
Y '°� -• Hds10e(0-0 1 DU/AC Max)
•.. - '•� Rural 10 1-0 2 LR/IAC Max)
. ar
•'� ■ open space
Temeads &eS TrbalTrusrLaras
- �`� pN�• y �
V'j
Lakes
--rr'J,� + — ❑ Cites
r
' .
�fiN�•AAy�
i
1:105,034
8,752.8 0 1 8,752.8 Feet
JIGS 1f18J WYeb Mercalor Auxilkvl Sphefe This map is a usef generated slater oulpifl from all Inlemel fnappdnq site arld 5 for rere?lefire of* Data Myefs That
®La"e Geographics Group Lid appeal on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or olhervase reliable
6
1.2 GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE DESCRIPTION
The City of Temecula (City) is an incorporated city in the southwestern portion of Riverside
County. The City is 30.17 square miles and is 30 miles south of the county seat, the City of
Riverside. The City sits north of (and adjacent to) San Diego County. The City's eastern and
western boundaries are Riverside County jurisdictions. To the north of the City is the City of
Murrieta. Interstate Highway 15 travels north and south through the western portion of the City.
State Highway 79 travels east from the City on both the southern and northern portions of the
City. Murrieta Creek, which is a pathway from Lake Skinner Reservoir, is on the western portion
of the City. Temecula Creek, which is a pathway from the Vail Lake Reservoir, is on the
southern portion of the City. Both creeks combine to form the Santa Margarita River in the
extreme southwest portion of the jurisdiction. The Santa Margarita Mountains run along the
western portion of the jurisdiction.
The City of Temecula's mean yearly temperature is 64.7°F (with an average high temperature of
76.5°F and an average low of 52.9°F). The average annual rainfall is 11.11 inches.
1.3 BRIEF HISTORY
Since incorporation in 1989 as a general law City, the City has improved upon its' original
blueprint to create a desirable community with exceptional public safety, community services,
recreational amenities, and a robust commerce.
1.4 ECONOMY DESCRIPTION
The City's development is a combination of residential, commercial and industrial. It is a
moderately densely populated community with 3.26 people per occupied dwelling unit and
approximately 109,064 citizens. The City maintains 34 parks throughout the community, which
provide recreation opportunities for both the citizens of Temecula, as well as surrounding
communities. Police and Fire protection are provided through a contract with Riverside
County. The Temecula Valley Unified School District provides 32 schools for 28,468 students at
the kindergarten through 12th grade levels. The City prides itself on its community focus and
quality of life.
Figure 1-4: City of Temecula Comprehensive Annual Financial Report— Largest Employers
CITY OF TEMECULA - LARGEST EMPLOYERS
Employer Number of Employees Industry
Pechanqa Resort&Casino 3.800 Gam inq=Entertainment
Temecula Valley Unified School Dist 2,961 Public Education
Abbott Vascular 2,000 Medical Manufacturing
PHS Medline 900 Medical Supply
Temecula Valley Hospital 650 Hospital
Walmart 600 Retail
Infinean Technologies America's Corp585 Wafer Chi /Conductors
Macy's 420 Retail
Milgard Windows& Doors 400 Window&Door Mfg
Costco Wholesale 376 Warehouse
EMD Millipore Corporation 330 Bio-Tech
City of Temecula 313 Local Government
FFF Enterprises 303 Wholesale Distributors
DCH Auto Group Temecula 293 Auto Dealerships
Channell Corporation 264 Thermo Plastic Enclosures
McDonald's (Corporate Office) 262 Restaurant
Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac 234 Auto Sales&Repair
Temecula Creek Inn J.C. Resorts 245 Golf Resort
The Scotts Company 120-244 Equipment Manufacturing
Home Depot#1028 191 Building Materials
Temecula Vallev Toyota 187 Auto Sales&Repair
Air Bus DS Communications 180 Emergency Communication Systems
Lowes#775 170 Building Materials
Target 166 Retail
Pacific Hydraulic Services/MWA 155 Electric Motor Repair
WinCo Foods 154 Super Market
BTS Restaurant& Brewery 150 Restaurant
Gosch Ford Lincoln Mercury 150 Auto Sales&Repair
JCP 150 Retail
8
1.5 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Between 2006 and 2016, the total population of the City of Temecula increased from 90,120 to
109,064 (51 percent are females and 49 percent are males). The average age is 35 years old
and the median income is $71,329.
Figure 1.5.1 - 1.5.4— SCAG Report—City of Temecula
Population Growth
2006-2016
115000 —
110000
105000 -
100000
95000
90000
85000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total
• From 2006 to 2016, the City's population rate of 20.97 percent was higher than Riverside
County's rate of 18.82 percent.
• In 2016, 4.6 percent of Riverside County's population was in the City of Temecula.
Number of Households
Occupied Housing Units:2006-2016
110,000
105,000
100,000
95,000
90,000 —
85,000 —
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
--*—Total
9
Between 2006 and 2016 the total number of households in the City of Temecula increased by
18,899, or 21 percent.
E During this time period the City's household growth rate of 21 percent was higher than the County
of Riverside's growth rate of 19.23 percent.
4.7 percent of Riverside County's total number of household's is in the City of Temecula.
Average Household Size
3.4
3.35
3.3
3.25
3.2
3.15 A, -
3.1
3.05
3
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Temecula Riverside
• In 2016 the City's average household size was 3.26, which was slightly higher than the County's
average of 3.24.
1.6 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND LAND USE
The residential growth of the City of Temecula will continue to expand as there are many people
attracted to the City. Light commercial growth will follow residential growth in these parts of the
City. The heavy commercial and industrial growth will continue to develop along the western
portion of the City, along the base of the hills and will continue along the Interstate 15 and
Highway 79.
Figure 1.6.1 —City of Temecula Housing Production
1/1/2006-10/13/2014 10/15/2014-12/31/2016
Single Family Residential- 2,815 Single Family Residential - 320
Multi-Family Residential- 1,490 Multi-Family Buildings- 248
Custom Single Family- 34 Total: 568
Total: 4339
• Total housing production between 1/1/2006 through 12/31/2016 is 4,907.
10
SECTION 2.0 - PLANNING PROCESS
2.1 LOCAL PLANNING PROCESS
• In March of 2017, a draft of the LHMP Annex was submitted to City departments to
review, comment, and/or edit information.
• In April of 2017, the 2012 LHMP Annex was posted on the City's website for public
comments (to update the 2017 LHMP Annex).
• On May 2, 2017 the LHMP Annex was mentioned during the Temecula Citizen Corps
Advisory Board Meeting, but was not placed on the agenda. During this meeting
individuals were asked to visit the City's website (cityoftemecula.gov) to review the 2012
LHMP Annex and provide feedback for updates to the 2017 LHMP Annex. Although the
City received comments from individuals that attended the Temecula Citizen Corps
Advisory Board Meeting concerning dates and hazards, the suggested changes were
already incorporated in the draft 2017 LHMP Annex - therefore, no additional changes
were necessary.
• The 2017 LHMP Annex was formally placed on the Southwest Committee Meeting
agenda for the May16, 2017 meeting.
• The 2017 LHMP Annex was formally placed on the Temecula Citizen Corps Advisory
Board Meeting agenda for the June 6, 2017 meeting.
• On May 25, 2017, the LHMP Annex was presented during a noticed meeting to the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission where the Commission Members as well as
members of the public were allowed to provide feedback.
2.2 PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL (OA) PLANNING PROCESS
The City of Temecula participated in Riverside county workshops, including:
• Mitigation Planning for Local and Tribal Communities Workshop —April 3 and 4 of 2017
• Ranch California Water District Multi-Jurisdictional LHMP Meeting —April 18, 2017
• Public Presentation — Public/Traffic Safety Commission — May 25, 2017
• Temecula Citizen Corps Advisory Board Meeting — June 6, 2017
• Quarterly Operational Area Planning Committee meetings which are open to the public
and to stakeholders in the County of Riverside.
2.3 DATES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
LHMP Annex meetings were held throughout the year where the public was able to provide
comments. In addition, the City of Temecula posted the 2012 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Annex on the City's website for comment to be addressed in the 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation
Plan Annex.
11
2.4 PLANS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION
Upon approval by FEMA, the LHMP Annex will be presented to the City Council in a public
meeting for adoption via an official resolution.
SECTION 3.0 - MITIGATION ACTIONS/UPDATES
3.1 UPDATES FROM 2012 PLAN
There are only minor edit changes but no additional hazards from the 2012 plan. In addition, the
priorities remain the same, including earthquakes, fires, and floods.
3.2 LIST OF COUNTY AND CITY HAZARDS
County of Riverside City of Temecula
1. Earthquake 1. Transportation _
2. Pandemic Flu 2. Earthquake
3. Wildland Fire 3. Flood
4. Electrical Failure 4. Terrorism
5. Emergent Disease/Contamination 5. Wildland Fire
*Listed above are the ranking top five hazards for the County of Riverside and City of Temecula.
3.3 NEW HAZARDS OR CHANGES FROM 2012
The City of Temecula reviewed the hazards that affect the City of Temecula and determined that
there are no additional hazards since the 2012 LHMP Annex.
3.4 BRIEF STATEMENT OF UNIQUE HAZARDS
The hazards in the City of Temecula include the same hazards as most of Riverside County,
including earthquakes, fires, and floods. Additionally, the City has more transportation related
hazards and incidents because of the highways (Interstate 15 and Highway 79) within the city
sphere.
3.5 MITIGATION PROJECT UPDATES
There are no known funding opportunities currently utilized in Public Works for the purposes of
(or for) hazard mitigation measures. The Murrieta Creek Project, currently under construction is
administered by the Army Corps of Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control. The City has
been a partner in the overall improvement project so that the construction of Main Street Bridge
and future creek crossings along Murrieta Creek would meet the most recent design standards
necessary to facilitate the Murrieta Creek Project improvements.
12
SECTION 4.0 - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
4.1 CRITICAL FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURES
Critical Facilities Type Number
Public Safetv Dispatch 2
Emergency Operations Center 3
City Hall 1
Fire Stations 5
Water Reservoirs 39
Water Treatment Plants 0
Waste Water Treatment Plants 1
Hospitals 1
Police Facility 2
Maintenance Yards 1
Senior Community Centers 1
Schools 29
Radio Repeaters 1
4.2 ESTIMATING POTENTIAL LOSS
The hazards experienced by the City of Temecula include floods and fires. The volume of rain
that is experienced during the year places a great stress on City resources, but through
mutual/automatic aid agreements the City experiences minimal effect.
4.3 TABLE REPLACEMENT VALUES
Name of Asset Replacement Hazard Specific Information
Value $
Civic Center/Parking Structure 53,186,024 Earthquake, Flood, Cyber
TVE2 9,271,800 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
Ronald Regan Sports Park; Community 8,550,610 Earthquake
Recreation Center Offices (CRC);
Meeting Rooms
Temecula Community Center 3,009,800 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
-Mary Phillips Senior Center 2,060,400 Earthquake, Flood, Fire, *Haz. Spill
Temecula Valley History Museum 1,854,360 Earthquake, Flood, Fire, *Haz. Spill
Children's Museum 2,317,950 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
Old Town Temecula Community Theater 9,271,800 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
Mercantile Building 1,545,300 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
West Wing Maintenance Facility/Office 3,399,660 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
Field Operations Center 7,005,360 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
Temecula Public Library 10,302,000 Earthquake, Fire
Margarita Center 2,000,000 Earthquake
TCC SAFE House 1,279,563 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
Fire Station #84 3,090,600 Earthquake
Fire Station #73 1,854,360 Earthquake
Fire Station #92 2,800,702 Earthquake
Temecula Citizen Corps and Paramedics 61,812 Earthquake
Pantry Storage 741,744 Earthquake, Flood, Fire
*Hazardous Spill given the facility's close proximity to the 1-15 Freeway.
13
4.4 IDENTIFICATION OF RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES
1. Flood — Severity 4, Probability 3, Ranking 3
The City of Temecula has had a long history of heavy rains. It is not the drainage from the
City itself that has had flooding in the past; the City's drainage system has been more than
adequate for the seasonal rains. The possibility of flood for the City of Temecula stems from
its location between two major drainages, Murrieta Creek to the north (and west of the City)
and Temecula Creek on the south. Both come together to form the Santa Margarita River in
the southwest corner of the City. The last major flood experienced from these two creeks was
in 1993. The City has taken steps to control flooding through vegetation reduction, creek
maintenance, and bridge upkeep. With the continued practice, flooding within the City should
be prevented. The City of Temecula participates in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
a
2. Wild Fire -Severity 3, Probability 3, Ranking 5
Due to the dry weather in Temecula, brush fires are more common on hot days. In August
2012, Aguanga fires invaded a community nearby Temecula and the City became the
evacuation center for many of the individuals that had to evacuate. Emergency response
personnel and local residents were frightened at the possibility that the fire may reach the
City of Temecula. The fire burned 3,000 acres within 10 hours. This fire was difficult to
14
contain. August, one of the hottest months for Southern California, assisted the fire
expansion. Incidents such as this have been common throughout the years.
Smaller fires also caused a big disruption in the City as well. The City has endured many
small brush fires that start on the hillsides that run parallel to the freeway that cause traffic
jams. Many of these fires are controlled in a timely manner because of Cal Fire.
3. Earthquake - Severity 4, Probability 3, Ranking 2
The City of Temecula is located in Seismic Hazard Zone. The nearest active earthquake
faults are located (listed below). Moreover, the City has experienced several noticeable
ground movement incidents (list below), but no local damage was sustained.
%g
E
p,
D
r r + v ,
f s Do
f 1 C
31
Elsinore Fault Line
The Elsinore Fault Line zone is on the Interstate 15 corridor (on the western portion of the
City) running parallel with the interstate in a north and south direction.
Other Fault Zones
San Andreas Fault: This fault zone is located approximately 55 miles northeast of the City of
Temecula and is a dominant active fault in California.
San Jacinto Fault: This fault is located approximately 35 miles northeast of the City of
Temecula and is a dominant active fault in California.
15
Historical Earthquake Data Within 100 Miles)
Date Distance from Temecula Maqnitude
6/10/2016 65.6 5.2
3/29/2014 63.1 5.1
7/05/2014 70.5 4.6
3/11/2013 33.6 4.7
""All dates, distances,and magnitude in the table below are measured in miles.
5 year period and magnitude of>then 4
4. Severe Weather- Heat/Wind/Cold - Severity 2, Probability 3, Ranking 8
In the City of Temecula, the hills on the side of the Interstate 15 freeway have trees, but they
are not standing upright. Instead, these trees are curved towards the freeway. The cause of
these trees losing their stability is the heavy winds prevalent in the city. In the evening, winds
travel around 10-14 mph and gusts can be as high as 25-50 mph. These high winds can
cause a lot of damage to the community (i.e. falling tree limbs and other debris on the road).
The City of Temecula experiences moderate snow every 10 years or so. Although snow is
rare, it causes a disruption in the City, as residents are not accustomed to driving in snowy
conditions. The snowy conditions increase the risk of accidents on the road.
The City experiences hot, dry days during the summer. There are days where temperatures
climb over 105 degrees. Below is a chart of the City's highest temperatures over the past five
years:
I
Year Temperature
2012 104.5
2013 103.6'
I
2014 l 105.0
I
2015 105.2°
i
2016 110.1 *
5. Hazardous Materials - Severity 3, Probability 4, Ranking 1
There is a high risk of hazardous materials affecting the City of Temecula. The City has
Interstate 15 traveling north and south through the western portion of the City and State
Highway 79 traveling east on both the northern and southern sides. State Highway 79 and
16
Interstate 15 are used heavily by transporters and commuters on a daily basis. This makes
the risk of an accident occurring much higher. Another risk is having an industrial building
leak hazardous material.
6. Technical Hazards - Severity 3, Probability 3, Ranking 6
There is the potential for death and injury from large-scale motor vehicle accidents. There is
also the potential for hazardous material spills or fires as numerous commercial
transportation vehicles travel through the City limits on Interstate 15 with various quantities
and types of hazardous materials.
Also, there is the potential of death and injury from large-scale industrial accidents with the
City of Temecula. There are numerous large industrial facilities storing a wide variety of
hazardous chemicals in large quantities. Many of the facilities store enough material to
require their own hazardous materials teams on site. The City of Temecula has large volume
gas pipe lines through its jurisdiction increasing the chance of a hazardous materials
incident.
7. Dam Failure - Severity 2, Probability 3, Ranking 20
The City of Temecula is located down elevation of two water reservoirs. The largest is the
Lake Skinner Reservoir. The reservoir is located approximately 10 miles (15 km) northeast of
the City. It was created in 1973 by the construction of the Skinner Clearwell Dam (expanded
1991), and currently has a capacity of 44,200 acre feet (54,500,000 m3). There is a low
likelihood of the water inundating the City of Temecula. Vail Lake is the second large
reservoir located near the City of Temecula. It is located east of Temecula on Temecula
Creek in the Santa Margarita River watershed, approximately 15 miles (24 km) east of
Temecula. It covers approximately 1,100 acres (4.5 km2) and has storage capacity of 51,000
acre feet (63,000,000 m). The Vail Dam was recently inspected and found to be structurally
deficient in the event of an earthquake. Diamond Valley Lake is a man-made off stream
reservoir in Southern California and also one of the newest, with 800,000 acre feet
(990,000,000 m) of water.
8. Drought - Severity 3, Probability 2, Ranking 11
The state of California invariable experiences drought conditions and the conservation of
water is very important. The City of Temecula's mission is to protect water resources,
maintain water quality, and use water wisely.
17
Drought Conditions rPercenrAreal
None DO-D4 D1434
Current 76.54 23.46 824 1.10 0.00 0-00
Last Week 74.49 25-51 8-73 4.08 0.00 0-00
2/282017
3 Months Ago 1203 87 97 73-04 60 27 42-80 21-04
121&2016
Start of
Calendar Year 18-07 81.93 67.61 54 02 38.17 18.31
1131M 17
Start of
Water Year 0.00 100-00 83-59 62-27 42-80 2104
*2712016
One Year Ago 0-43 99 57 97.49 83 16 60-86 38.48
34M16
Intens -
DO AbnormaNry Dry D3 EA treme Drought
D1 Moderate Drought D4 Exml.nal Drought
D2 Severe Drought `
See Part II - Inventory Worksheet Page 18 for complete ranking chart.
SECTION 5.0 - COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM
5.1 REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES
There is no repetitive loss of properties in the City of Temecula flood plain based on the City
information, flood map below.
-- - i
5.2 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROPERTIES
a. Describe participation in NF/P, including any changes since previously
approved plan.
There have been no changes since previously approved plans
b. Date first joined NF/P.
18
1989
c. Identify actions related to continued compliance with NF/P.
d. CRS member?
No
e. CRS class?
No
f. Describe any data used to regulate flood hazard area other than FEMA maps.
N/A
g. Have there been issues with community participation in the program?
No
h. What are the general hurdles for effective implementation of the NF/P?
None
i. Summarize actions related to continued compliance with NF/P
• Continue to educate public through community outreach.
• Control flooding through vegetation reduction, creek maintenance, and
bridge upkeep.
ii. Repetitive Loss Properties- None since approval of 2012 plan.
Other risks:
SECTION 6.0 - CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT
6.1 REGULATORY MITIGATION CAPABILITIES
Capabilities are the programs and policies currently in use to reduce hazard impacts or that
could be used to implement hazard mitigation activities. This capabilities assessment is divided
into five sections -
• Regulatory Mitigation Capabilities
• Administrative And Technical Mitigation Capabilities
■ Fiscal Mitigation Capabilities
• Mitigation Outreach And Partnerships
• Funding Sources
19
First, Regulatory Mitigation Capabilities
Regulatory Tool Yes/No Comments
General plan Yes Comprehensive General Plan
Zoning ordinance Yes Riverside County/City of Temecula Code
Subdivision ordinance Yes
Site plan review requirements Yes Riverside County/City of Temecula Code
Floodplain ordinance Yes
Other special purpose ordinance No
(storm water, water conservation,
wildfire)
Building code Yes Riverside County/City of Temecula Code, 2016
Building Code
Fire department ISO rating Yes
Erosion or sediment control program No
Storm water management program Yes City of Temecula Master Plan
Capital improvements plan Yes Reviewed Annually
Economic development plan Yes Reviewed Annually
Local emergency operations plan Yes Reviewed Annually
Flood Insurance Study or other J-No
en2ineerin2 study for streams
6.2 ADMINISTRATIVE/TECHNICAL MITIGATION CAPABILITIES
Personnel Resources Yes/No Department/Position
Planner/engineer with knowledge of land
development/land management practices Yes Public Works
Engineer/professional trained in construction
practices related to buildings and/or
infrastructure Yes Public Works
Engineer with an understanding of natural
hazards Yes Public Works
Personnel skilled in GIS Yes Information Technology
Full time building.official Yes Community Development
Floodplain manager No
20
Emergencv manager Yes City Manager/Risk Manager
Grant writer Yes Various Departments
GIS Data—Land use Yes Information Technology
GIS Data—Links to Assessor's data Yes Information Technology
Warning systems/services
(Reverse 9-11, outdoor warning signals) Yes Information Technology
6.3 FISCAL MITIGATION CAPABILITIES
Accessible/Eligible
Financial Resources to Use Yes/No Comments
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital improvements project funding Yes
Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Yes With voter
approval
Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services No
Impact fees for new development Yes
Incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes With voter
approval
Incur debt through special tax bonds Yes With voter
approval
Incur debt through private activities No
Withhold spending in hazard prone areas N/A
Other N/A
6.4 MITIGATION OUTREACH AND PARTNERSHIPS
The City of Temecula has partnerships with county and state agencies. The City has
agreements with the Riverside County Office of Emergency Services, Cal Fire, County Sheriff,
and others. These agreements allow the City to utilize county and state resources with trained
personnel. There are multiple outreach programs, Fire and Police reserves, TCC, CERT, safety
fairs by local business and special community events.
6.5 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
® There are no known funding opportunities currently utilized in Public Works for the
purposes of (or for) hazard mitigation measures. The Murrieta Creek Project,
currently under construction is administered by the Army Corps of Engineers and
Riverside County Flood Control. The City has been a partner in the overall
improvement project so that the construction of Main Street Bridge and future
21
creek crossings along Murrieta Creek would meet the most recent design
standards necessary to facilitate the Murrieta Creek Project improvements.
The City is building the City's Emergency Operation Center as a Capital
improvement Program utilizing Fire Development Impact Fees. The project is
expected to be completed in 2018.
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION STRATEGIES
7.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goal 1: Provide Protection for People's Lives from All Hazards
Objective 1.1: Provide timely notification and direction to the public of imminent and potential hazards.
Objective 1.2: Protect public health and safety by preparing for, responding to, and recovering from
the effects of natural or technological disasters.
Objective 1.3: Improve community transportation corridors to allow for better evacuation routes for
public and better access for emergency responders.
Goal 2: Improve Community and Agency Awareness about Hazards and Associated Vulnerabilities That
Threaten Our Communities
Objective: 2.1: Increase public awareness about the nature and extent of hazards they are exposed
to, where they occur, what is vulnerable, and recommended responses to identified hazards (i.e. both
preparedness and response).
Goal 3: Improve the Community's Capability to Mitigate Hazards and Reduce Exposure to Hazard
Related Losses
Objective 3.1: Reduce damage to property from an earthquake event.
3.1.1:Adopt/maintain building codes to meet required earthquake standards.
Objective 3.2: Reduce flood and storm related losses.
3.2.1: Provide for better collection of data related to severe weather events.
3.2.2: Continued maintenance of drainage corridors
3.2.3: Continued work with county flood control
Objective 3.3: Minimize the impact to the City due Traffic corridors being restricted.
Objective 3.4: Improve the city's ability to be self-supportive in times of disasters
3.4:1: Shelter of disaster victims
3.4:2: Food and Water for disaster victims
3.4:3: Ensure emergency response through city resources
Goal 4: Provide Protection for Critical Facilities, Utilities, and Services from Hazard Impacts
Objective 4:1 Continue implication of state and county building codes
Goal 5: Maintain Coordination of Disaster Planning
Objective 5.1: Coordinate with changing DHS/FEMA needs.
22
5.1.1: National Incident Management System (NIMS)
5.1.2: Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) planning
5.1.3: Emergency Operations plans
Objective 5.2: Coordinate with community plans.
5.2.1: General plans
5.2.2: Earthquake plans
5.2.3: Drainage plans
5.2.4: Intergovernmental agency disaster planning.
Objective 5.3: Maximize the use of shared resources between jurisdictions and special districts for
mitigation/communication.
5.3.1: Maintain and develop Mutual/Automatic Aid agreements with adjacent jurisdictions and
agencies.
Objective 5.4: Standardize systems among agencies to provide for better interoperability.
5.4.1: Standardize communication technology and language.
Goal 6: Maintain/Provide for FEMA Eligibility and Work to Position City Departments and Community
Partners for Grant Funding
7.2 MITIGATION ACTIONS
The Murrieta Creek Project, currently in construction is administered by the Army Corps of
Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control. The City has been a partner in the overall
improvement project so that the construction of Main Street Bridge and future creek crossings
along Murrieta Creek would meet the most recent design standards necessary to facilitate the
Murrieta Creek Project improvements.
7.3 ON-GOING MITIGATION STRATEGY PROGRAMS
The Murrieta Creek Project, currently in construction is administered by the Army Corps of
Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control. The City has been a partner in the overall
improvement project so that the construction of Main Street Bridge and future creek crossings
along Murrieta Creek would meet the most recent design standards necessary to facilitate the
Murrieta Creek Project improvements. This projects goal is to further ensure public health,
safety, and protection of the vital riverine environment. The first phase is to widen the creek from
USGS stream gauge to First Street. Phase two is reinforcing channel walls with natural creek
bottom. Phase three is creating 163 acres of new habitat and 50 acres of recreational facilities.
The final phase is to channel improvement through Murrieta also, to protect Camp Pendleton
sewage treatment facilities. The project is expected to be completed in 2025.
23
7.4 FUTURE MITIGATION STRATEGIES
In the future, the City of Temecula will be incorporating the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex
into the General Plan in accordance with Senate Bill 379.
SECTION 8.0 - PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCESS
Plan Maintenance Process
The City of Temecula will monitor and evaluate the LHMP Annex on a 2 year basis. Over the
next 5 years, the City will review and assess the plan, to determine whether:
■ The goals and objectives address current and expected conditions.
• The nature, magnitude, and/or type of risks have changed.
• The current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan.
• There are implementation problems, such as technical, political, legal, or coordination
issues with other agencies.
• The outcomes have occurred as expected (a demonstration of progress).
• The agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed.
If the City discovers changes, the City will update the LHMP Revision Page, and notify Cal OES
to update the Annex.
The City of Temecula Executive Staff and Emergency Management department is responsible
for monitoring, evaluating and updating of LHMP Annex.
SECTION 9.0 - INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANNING MECHANISMS
The County has a Safety Element in its General Plan that includes a discussion of fire,
earthquake, flooding, and landslide hazards. This plan was adopted as an implementation
appendix to the Safety Element. In addition, the County enforces the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which, since 1988, requires mitigation for identified
natural hazards. The County has used these pre-existing programs as a basis for identifying
gaps that may lead to disaster vulnerabilities in order to work on ways to address these risks
through mitigation.
The City has several planning mechanisms which incorporate the following:
➢ General plan safety element
➢ Capital Improvements Plan
➢ City Community Action Plan
➢ City Strategic Vision
➢ Title 8 — Health and Safety Municipal Codes
1. Chapter 8.16 Hazardous Vegetation
2. Chapter 8.28 Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management
3. Chapter 8.40 Fireworks
24
4. Chapter 8.48 Heritage Tree Ordinance
➢ Title 15 — Building and Construction
1. Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes
2. Chapter 15.12 Floodplain Management
3. Chapter 15.16 Fire Code
➢ Title 17 —Zoning
1. 17.20 Floodplain Overlay District and Flood Damage Prevention (Floodplain
Management Regulations)
➢ Ordinance 91-18 Ch. 6.16 and § 6.14.002 abatement of hazardous vegetation
➢ Ordinance 93-23 Clearing of brush for fire protection purposes (8.16)
SECTION 10.0 - CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
After the City of Temecula implements the scheduled plan maintenance process, the City will
notify the public of any changes to the LHMP Annex by updating the City's website and
presenting the updates at open public comment meetings.
25
APPENDIX - PUBLIC NOTICES AND MAPS
SEE ATTACHMENTS
6 Lod Harard Mitigatio, x `
F C temeculaca.gov!t,iib, ri,,;-u Y.Lt•g3ben Fran
Public Safety Safety i• ea c,-e—x,_ Q
I I�
l
1 �
}
H—.,Cry Seg-,,—P h1,c Safey•Ener,ySc- —&PublicS f-,r.Lod Hazard A4ugaoan Wn
Emergency Services
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
Temecula Alert
We want your feedback!The City of Temecula is updating the City's 2072{, pl H3ClIru>41nfYatk[n RJao[I H0.tR1-
Law Enforcement Agencies The purpose ofthe LHMP is to ldentlfy local hazards,review and assess past disaster occurrences.estimate the
probability ofhnure occurrences,and setgoals to mitigate potential nsks(to reduce or eliminate long-term risk)to
Public Safety ► people and property from natural and man-made hazards..
Local Hazard Mitigation Please review the LHMP and comment on anythingyou believe should be addressed in in the 20;7 updated plan.
Plan Comments should be emailed toii.hfl�;.;II:a.91•!�.CL's=s5;,C!fi5='� =•�± _•
26
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT / AGENCY
Multi jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP)
Meeting
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 18, 2017 - 10:OOAM / SRRRA
1. Agency status
2. Public workshops
3. Any FEMA updates
4. EMD update
5. Agency target completion dates
27
00
N
Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting
TOPIC: Plan deveoi menuproject;
Riverside Coun Multi-}urisdictional Plan
DATE-April 18,2017,Rancho California Water District
First Name Last Nance Signature Agency
S'c /Z c w
C-()CCW u 5
Q d L ci,t, V, , c , R
APPENDIX B - INVENTORY WORKSHEETS
SEE ATTACHMENTS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION AGENCY
INVENTORY WORKSHEETS
City of Temecula
04/25/2017
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction: These documents are meant to be discussed, used and reviewed by a
multi-disciplinary team. The Participation by a wide range of stakeholders who play a
role in identifying and implementing mitigation actions is required.
SPECIAL CONCERNS:
1. Has the completed Letter of Commitment been returned to EMD? EMD must
forward this completed Letter of Commitment to CAL OES.
2. Has the completed Letter of Participation been returned to EMD?
1 . Local Jurisdiction Contact Information Page 3
2. Hazard Identification Questionnaire Pages 4-6
3. Specific Hazards Summary Page 7
4. Jurisdiction Vulnerability Worksheet Pages 8-9
5. Jurisdiction Mitigation Strategies and Goals Pages 10-14
6. Local Jurisdiction Proposed Mitigation Action
and Strategy Proposal Pages 14-16
7. Local Jurisdiction Development Trends Pages 17-18
8. Appendix A-Plan Review Tool Pages Al-10
Appendix A the Plan Review Tool for your reference. This is the document Cal OES
and FEMA will utilize to verify that all of the required information is in the submitted
documents. Please refer to the document for information.
3
1. LOCAL JURISDICTION CONTACT INFORMATION
The information on this page identifies:
*Jurisdiction and the contact person
•Jurisdiction's service area size and population
.EOP Plan and a Safety Element of their General Plan
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
Agency/Jurisdiction: Temecula
Type Agency/Jurisdiction: Cit
Contact Person: Title Risk Manager
First Name: Roberto Last Name: Cardenas
Agency Address: Street: 41000 Main St
City: Temecula
State: CA
Zip: 92590
Contact Phone 951) 693-3944 FAX
E-mail Roberto.cardenas@temeculaCA.gov
Population Served 109,064 j Square Miles Served 130.17
Does your organization have a general plan? Yes
Does your organization have a safety component to the general plan? Yes
What year was your plan last updated?
Does your organization have a disaster/emergency operations plan? Yes
What year was your plan last updated?
Do you have a recovery annex or section in your plan? Yes
Do you have a terrorism/WMD annex or section in your plan? Yes
4
2. Hazard Identification Questionnaire
The purpose of the questionnaire is to help identify the hazards within your service
area. The list was developed from the first round of meetings with the various working
groups in the 2012 plan creation, and from the hazards listed in the County's General
Plan. Each hazard is discussed in detail in the 2012 LHMP. The information will be
used as the basis for each jurisdiction to evaluate its capabilities, determine its needs,
and to assist in developing goals and strategies. The information identifies:
a) What hazards can be identified within or adjacent to the service area of the
jurisdiction.
b) Which of those hazards have had reoccurring events
c) What specific hazards and risks are considered by the jurisdiction to be a threat
specifically to the jurisdiction? (These locations should be identified by name
and location for inclusion in the Specific Hazard Summary Table).
a. Specific types of facilities owned and operated by the jurisdiction.
b. Locations damaged from prior disasters or hazard causing events.
d) Information about the jurisdiction's EOC
With your Multi-Disciplinary Planning Team:
a. Instructions for Updating Jurisdictions, with your planning team: Review your old
Questionnaire for accuracy and relevance, mark changes.
b. Instructions for New Jurisdictions and Special Districts, with your planning team,
meet and go over the questionnaire. Fill in YES, NO or NA on the Questionnaire.
5
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE:
AIRPORT IN JURISDICTION No
AIRPORT NEXT TO JURISDICTION Yes
DAIRY INDUSTRY No
POULTRY INDUSTRY No
CROPS/ORCHARDS No
DAMS IN JURISDICTION No
DAMS NEXT TO JURISDICTION Yes
LAKE/RESERVOIR IN JURISDICTION No
LAKE/RESERVOIR NEAR JURISDICTION Yes
JURISDICTION IN FLOOD PLAIN Yes
CONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL Yes
UNCONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL Yes
EARTHQUAKE FAULTS IN JURISDICTION Yes
EARTHQUAKE FAULTS NEXT TO JURISDICTION Yes
MOBILE HOME PARKS Yes
NON-REINFORCED FREEWAY BRIDGES No
NON-REINFORCED BRIDGES No
BRIDGES IN FLOOD PLAIN Yes
BRIDGES OVER OR ACROSS RIVER/STREAM Yes
ROADWAY CROSSING RIVER/STREAM Yes
NON REINFORCED BUILDINGS Yes
FREEWAY/MAJOR HIGHWAY IN JURISDICTION Yes
FREEWAY/MAJOR HIGHWAY NEXT TO JURISDICTION Yes
FOREST AREA IN JURISDICTION No
FOREST AREA NEXT TO JURISDICTION Yes
WITHIN THE 50 MILES SAN ONOFRE EVACUATION ZONE Yes
MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINES IN JURISDICTION Yes
MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINES NEXT TO JURISDICTION Yes
RAILROAD TRACKS IN JURISDICTION No
RAILROAD TRACKS NEXT TO JURISDICTION No
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES IN JURISDICTION No
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES NEXT TO JURISDICTION No
HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITIES IN JURISDICTION I Yes
HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITIES NEXT TO JURISDICTION I No
DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN OR OPERATE A FACILITY
IN A FLOOD PLAIN No
NEAR FLOOD PLAIN Yes
NEAR RAILROAD TRACKS No
NEAR A DAM No
UPSTREAM FROM A DAM No
DOWNSTREAM FROM A DAM Yes
DOWNSTREAM OF A LAKE Yes
DOWNSTREAM FROM A RESERVOIR Yes
NEAR A CONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL Yes
NEAR UNCONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL No
ON AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT Yes
NEAR AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT Yes
WITHIN THE 50 MILE SAN ONOFRE EVACUATION ZONE Yes
IN A FOREST AREA No
NEAR A FOREST AREA Yes
6
NEAR A MAJOR HIGHWAY Yes
A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY No
NEAR A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY No
A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY Yes
NEAR A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY No
NON REINFORCED BUILDINGS No
A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE No
NEAR A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE Yes
DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE ANY LOCATIONS THAT:
HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY EARTHQUAKE AND NOT REPAIRED No
HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FLOOD Yes
HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FLOOD MORE THAN ONCE Yes
HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FOREST FIRE No
HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FOREST FIRE MORE THAN ONCE No
HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY A TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT No
HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY A PIPELINE EVENT No
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS INFORMATION
DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE AN EOC Yes
IS YOUR EOC LOCATED IN A FLOOD PLAIN No
NEAR FLOOD PLAIN Yes
NEAR RAILROAD TRACKS No
NEAR A DAM No
UPSTREAM FROM A DAM No
DOWNSTREAM FROM A DAM No
DOWNSTREAM OF A LAKE No
DOWNSTREAM FROM A RESERVOIR No
NEAR A CONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL No
NEAR UNCONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL No
ON AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT No
NEAR AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT Yes
WITHIN THE 50 MILE SAN ONOFRE EVACUATION ZONE Yes
IN A FOREST AREA No
NEAR A FOREST AREA No
NEAR A MAJOR HIGHWAY No
A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY No
NEAR A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY Yes
A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY No
NEAR A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY No
NON REINFORCED BUILDINGS No
A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE Yes
NEAR A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE _ _ No
OTHER FACILITY INFORMATION
ARE THERE LOCATIONS WITHIN YOUR JURISDICTION THAT:
COULD BE CONSIDERED A TERRORIST TARGET Yes
COULD BE CONSIDERED A BIO-HAZARD RISK Yes
With your planning team, list the "Yes" answers and discuss. Use the information as a group to
summarize your jurisdiction's hazards and vulnerabilities.
7
3. SPECIFIC HAZARDS SUMMARY
This table helps to identify the information (name, owner, location, etc.) about the specific
hazards identified in the Hazard Questionnaire.
In the Summary Table, list the basic information of the hazards identified by the jurisdiction in
the Hazard Identification Questionnaire as a potential threat. These specific hazards were
used in the development of response plans, maps, and other analysis data.
a. Instructions for Updating Jurisdictions and Special Districts: With your planning team,
review the "Yes" answers and see if there were any changes, if so summarize why there
is a difference from the 2012.
b. Instructions for New Jurisdictions and Special Districts: With your planning team, review
the "Yes" answers and discuss. Use the information as a group to summarize your
jurisdiction's hazards and vulnerabilities.
SPECIFIC HAZARDS SUMMARY
Jurisdiction Hazard Type Hazard Name In Adjacent to
Jurisdiction? Jurisdiction?
Temecula (Fire Yes J
7
4. JURISDICTION VULNERABILITY WORKSHEET
This table is a listing of the primary hazards identified by the 2012 LHMP working groups. Each jurisdiction was asked to evaluate the
potential for an event to occur in their jurisdiction by hazard. They were also asked to evaluate the potential impact of that event by
hazard on their jurisdiction. The impact potential was determined based on:
1. Economic loss and recovery
2. Physical loss to structures (residential, commercial, and critical facilities)
3. The loss or damage to the jurisdictions infrastructure
4. Their ability to continue with normal daily governmental activities
5. Their ability to quickly recover from the event and return to normal daily activities
6. The loss of life and potential injuries from the event.
The jurisdictions were asked to rate the potential and severity using a scale of between 0 and 4 (4 being the most severe). The
jurisdictions were also asked to rank the listed hazards as they relate to their jurisdiction from 1 to 20 (1 being the highest overall threat to
their jurisdiction).
With the assistance of the RCIP Plan and County Departments, Riverside County OES conducted an extensive evaluation of the severity
and probability potential for the county as a whole. The hazards were also ranked for the County. These numbers and rankings
were provided to the jurisdictions as a comparison guide.
A separate table was created to address the hazards relating to agriculture and was assessed by the agriculture working group.
a. Instructions for Updating Jurisdictions and Special Districts: Please review the table, determine if your ranking from the 2012 LHMP
remains the same.
b. Instructions for New Jurisdictions and Special Districts: Please evaluate the potential for an event to occur in your jurisdiction by
hazard. Then, evaluate the potential impact of that event by hazard on your jurisdiction according to #1-6 from the potential impact
list above.
NOTE: Under Medical, Pandemic was added. This was a result of the H1 N1 and other incidents.
8
NAME: Roberto Cardenas AGENCY: City of Temecula DATE : April 2017
f
_ COUNTY LOCAL JURISDICTION
SEVERITY PROBABILITY SEVERITY PROBABILITY RANKING
HAZARD 0 -4 0-4 0-4 0-4 1 -20
1. EARTHQUAKE 4 2 4 3 2
2. WILDLAND FIRE 3 4 3 3 5
3. FLOOD 3 3 4 3 3
OTHER NATURAL HAZARDS
4. DROUGHT 3 3 3 2 11
5. LANDSLIDES 3 3 2 2 14
6. INSECT INFESTATION 2 3 2 2 17
7. EXTREME SUMMER/WINTER
WEATHER 3 2 2 3 8
8. SEVERE WIND EVENT 3 2 9
AGRICULTURAL
9. DISEASE/CONTAMINATION N 3 3 0 0 18
10. TERRORISM 3 1 0 0 19
OTHER MAN-MADE
11. PIPELINE 3 2 2 2 12
12. AQUEDUCT 3 2 2 2 13
13. TRANSPORTATION 3 2 3 4 1
14. POWER OUTAGE 3 3 7
15. HAZMAT ACCIDENTS 3 4 3 3 6
16. NUCLEAR ACCIDENT 4 1 2 2 10
17. TERRORISM 3 1 2 2 4
18. CIVIL UNREST 3 2 2 2 15
19. JAIL/PRISON EVENT 2 1 1 1 16
MEDICAL -
20. PANDEMIC 4 2 2 2 10
9
5. JURISDICTION MITIGATION STRATEGIES AND GOALS
This comprehensive table is a listing of the various mitigation strategies, goals, and objectives
developed by the 2012 LHMP working groups. The jurisdictions were also given the opportunity to list
additional strategies, goals, and objectives specific to either their jurisdiction or their workgroup(i.e. the
hospitals, agriculture, etc.).
LOCAL JURISDICTION MITIGATION STRATEGIES AND GOALS
With your Planning Team
a. Instructions for Updating Jurisdictions and Special Districts: please review the table; determine if
your ranking from the 2012 LHMP remains the same.
b. Instructions for New Jurisdictions and Special Districts: please follow below:
Please evaluate the priority level for each listed mitigation goal identified below as it relates to your jurisdiction or
facility. If you have any additional mitigation goals or recommendations, please list them at the end of this
document. Place an H (High), M (Medium), L (Low), or N/A (Not Applicable) for your priority level for each
mitigation goal in the box next to the activity.
EARTHQUAKE
H Aggressive public education campaign in light of predictions
M Generate new literature for dissemination to:
M 0 Government employees
M 0 Businesses
M 0 Hotel/motel literature
M 0 Local radio stations for education
M 0 Public education via utilities
L 0 Identify/create television documentary content
H Improve the Emergency Alert System (EAS)
H 0 Consider integration with radio notifications stems
M 0 Upgrade alerting and warning systems for hearing impaired
M 0 Training and maintenance
H Procure earthquake-warning devices for critical facilities
M Reinforce emergency response facilities
H Provide training to hospital staffs
L Require earthquake gas shutoffs on remodels/new construction
M Evaluate re-enforcing reservoir concrete bases
M Evaluate EOCs for seismic stability
H Install earthquake cutoffs at reservoirs
M Install earthquake-warning devices at critical facilities
H Develop a dam inundation plan for new Diamond Valley Reservoir
H Earthquake retrofitting
H 0 Bridges/dams/pipelines
M 0 Government buildings/schools
M 0 Mobile home parks
H Develop educational materials on structural reinforcement and home inspections
(ALREADY DEVELOPED)
H Ensure Uniform Building Code compliance
H 0 Update to current compliance when retrofitting
M Insurance coverage on public facilities
10
M Fundinq for non-structural abatement (Earthquake kits, etc.)
L Pre- identifv empty commercial space for seismic re-location
L Electrical co-generation facilities need retrofitting/reinforcement (Palm Springs,
others?)
H Mappinq of liquefaction zones
H Incorporate County geologist data into planning_
M Backup water supplies for hospitals
H Evaluate pipeline seismic resiliency
M Pre-positioning of temporary response structures
H Firesprinkler ordinance for all structures
M Evaluate adequacy of reservoir capacity for sprinkler systems
H Training/standardization for contractors performing retrofitting
H Website with mitigation/contractor/retrofifting mitigation/contractor/retrofittinginformation
H 0 Links to jurisdictions
H 0 Alerting information
H 0 Volunteer information
M Evaluate depths of aquifers/wells for adequacy during quakes
H Evaluate hazmat storage regulations near faults
COMMUNICATIONS IN DISASTER ISSUES
H Communications Interoperability
H Harden repeater sites
H Continue existing interoperability project
H Strengthen/harden
L Relocate
H Redundancy
M Mobile repeaters
FLOODS
H Update development policies for flood plains
H Public education on locations of flood plains
H Develop multi-jurisdictional working roup on floodplain management
H Develop greenbelt requirements in new developments
H Update weather pattern/flood plain maps
M Conduct count ide study of flood barriers/channels/gates/water dispersals stems
H Required water flow/runoff plans for new development
H Perform GIS mapping of flood channels, etc.
M Install vehicular crossing ates/ph sical barriers for road closure
H Maintenance of storm sewers/flood channels
H Create map of flood channels/diversions/water systems etc.
H Require digital floor plans on new non-residential construction
M Upgrade dirt embankments to concrete
M Conduct countywide needs study on drainage capabilities
M Increase number of pumping stations
M Increase sandbag distribution capacities
H Develop re-planned response plan for floods
H 0 Evacuation documentation
H 0 Re-examine historical flooding data for potential street re-design
M Training for city/county PIOs about flood issues
11
M Warning systems - ensure accurate information provided
H 0 Publicize flood plain information (website?)
M 0 Install warning/water level signage
H 0 Enhanced public information
M 0 Road closure compliance
M 0 Shelter locations
H 0 Pre-event communications
M Look at County requirements for neighborhood access
M 0 Secondary means of ingress/egress
H Vegetation restoration programs
H Ensure critical facilities are hardened/backed up
M Hardening water towers
M Terrorism Surveillance - cameras at reservoirs/dams
M Riverbed maintenance
M Evaluate existing lift stations for adequacy
M Acquisition of property for on-site retention
M Evaluate regulations on roof drainage mechanism
M Erosion-resistant plants
H Traffic light protection
M Upkeep of diversionary devices
M Install more turn-off valves on pipelines
M Backup generation facilities
M Ilentify swift water rescue capabilities across County T
WILDFIRES
H Aaaressive weed abatement program
M 0 Networking of agencies for weed abatement
H Develop strategic plan for forest management
H Public education on wildfire defense
H Encourage citizen surveillance and reporting
H Identify hydrants with equipment ownership information
H Enhanced firefighting equipment
M Fire spotter program/red flag program
M 0 Expand to other utilities
M Research on insect/pest mitigation technologies
M Volunteer home inspection program
H Public education program
H 0 Weather reporting/alerting
H 0 Building protection
M 0 Respiration
H Pre-identify shelters/recovery centers/other resources
H Roofing materials/defensive spacing regulations
H Community task forces for planning and education
H Fuel/dead tree removal
M Strategic pre-placement of firefighting equipment
M Establish FEMA coordination processes based on ICS
H Brush clearings around repeaters
M Research new technologies for identifying/tracking fires
12
H Procure/deploy backup communications equipment
M "Red Taq" homes in advance of event
H Provide fire-resistant qel to homeowners
M Involve insurance agencies in mitigation programs
M Clear out abandoned vehicles from oases
H Code enforcement
H Codes prohibiting fireworks
H Fuel modification/removal
H Evaluate buildinq codes
M Maintaining catch basins
OTHER HAZARDS
M Improve pipeline maintenance
M Wetlands mosquito mitigation (West Nile Virus)
M Insect control stud
M Increase County Vector Control capacities
M General public drought awareness
M 0 Lawn watering rotation
M Develop County drought plan
M Mitigation of landslide-prone areas
M Develop winter storm sheltering Ian
L Ease permitting process for building transmission lines
M Evaluate restrictions on dust/dirUgenerating dust/dirt/generatingactivities during wind seasons
L Rotational crop planning/soil stabilization
L Enhance agricultural checkpoint enforcement
L Agriculture - funding of detection programs
L Communications of pipeline maps (based on need to know)
L Improved notification plan on runaway trains_
M Improve/maintain blackout notification plan.
M Support business continuity planning for utility outages
H Terrorism training/equipment for first responders
H 0 Terrorism planning/coordination
M 0 Staffing for terrorism mitigation
H Create a SONGS regional plannin rou
M 0 Include dirty bomb planning
M Cooling stations - MOUs in place
L Fire Ant eradication program
L White Fly infestation abatement/eradication program
M Develop plan for supplemental water sources
M Public education on low water landscaping
L Salton Sea desalinization
L Establish agriculture security standards (focus on water supply)
M ID mutual aid agreements
L Vulnerability assessment on fiber-optic cable
H Upgrade valves on California aqueduct
H Public education
H 0 Bi-lingual signs
M 0 Power Outage information
13
M Notification system for rail traffic - container contents
H Control and release of terrorism intelligence
M Develop prison evacuation plan (shelter in place?)
Use the list and rankings to narrow down or identify "your" strategies. The mitigation strategy
serves as the long-term blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk
assessment. The mitigation strategy includes the development of goals, objectives, and
prioritized mitigation actions.
Goals are general guidelines that explain what you want to achieve. They are broad policy
statements and are usually long-term and represent global visions, such as "Protect Existing
Property."
Objectives define strategies or implementation steps to attain the identified goals. Unlike goals,
objectives are specific, measurable, and may have a defined completion date. Objectives are
more specific, such as "Increase the number of buildings protected from flooding."
The development of effective goals and objectives enables the planning team to evaluate the
merits of alternative mitigation actions and the local conditions in which these activities would be
pursued. A potential mitigation action that would support the goal and objective goal example
above is "Acquire repetitive flood loss properties in the Acadia Woods Subdivision."
In the 2012 LHMP, each jurisdiction was required to develop a Mitigation Strategy Proposal
based on one of the following:
1. The strategy, goal, or objective rating "High Priority" on the Local Jurisdiction Mitigation
Strategies and Goals (WORKSHEET ABOVE)
2. A specifically identified strategy, goal, or objective that was developed as part of one of the
working groups planning sessions such as the hospitals or agriculture
3. A specifically identified strategy, goal, or objective that was developed as part of one of
the jurisdiction's internal working group planning sessions
14
6. LOCAL JURISDICTION PROPOSED MITIGATION ACTION AND STRATEGY
PROPOSAL
a. Instructions for Updating Jurisdictions and Special Districts: With your
planning team, please review the table from # 5, and determine if your
ranking from the 2012 LHMP remains the same.
Review the chosen Mitigation Strategy that your jurisdiction submitted. The
updated plan must identify the completed, deleted, or deferred actions or
activities from the previously approved plan as a benchmark for progress.
If the mitigation actions or activities remain unchanged from the previously
approved plan, the updated plan must indicate why changes are not
necessary. Further, the updated plan shall include in its prioritization any
new mitigation actions identified since the previous plan was approved or
through the plan update process.
b. Instructions for New Jurisdictions and Special Districts: With your planning team, Use the
"High Priority" rated strategy, goal or objective as a starting point to determine your
Mitigation Strategy Proposal.
15
LOCAL JURISDICTION PROPOSED MITIGATION ACTION AND STRATEGY PROPOSAL
Jurisdiction: City of Temecula
Contact: Roberto Cardenas
Phone: 951-693-3944
MITIGATION STRATEGY INFORMATION
Proposal Name:
Murrieta Creek Project
Proposal Location:
Murrieta Creek
Proposal Type
Place an "X" by the type of mitigation strategy (one or more may apply)
X Flood and mud flow mitigation
Fire mitigation
Elevation or acquisition of repetitively damaged structures or structures in high hazard areas
X Mitigation Planning (i.e. update building codes, planning develop guidelines, etc.)
Development and implementation of mitigation education programs
Development or improvement of warning systems
Additional Hazard identification and analysis in support of the local hazard mitigation plan
Drinking and/or irrigation water mitigation
Earthquake mitigation
Agriculture-crop related mitigation
Agriculture-animal related mitigation
X Flood inundation/Dam failure
Weather/Temperature event mitigation
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION STRATEGY
List any previous disaster related events(dates, costs. etc.)
Murrieta Creek traverses the cities of Temecula and Murrieta in the densely populated southwest
Proposal/Event region of Riverside County. As a result of repeated flood events, culminating with the catastrophic
History I flood in 1993 in which six people died.
Description of Give a detailed description of the need for the proposal, any history related to the proposal. List
Mitigation Goal the activities necessary for its completion in the narrative section below, including estimated
Narrative: timeline. haw long will it take)
This projects goal is to further ensure public health, safety, and protection of the vital riverine
environment. The first phase is to widen the creek from USGS stream gauge to First Street. Phase
two is reinforcing channel walls with natural creek bottom. Phase three is creating 163 acres of
new habitat and 50 acres of recreational facilities. The final phase is to channel improvement
through Murrieta. Also, to protect Camp Pendleton sewage treatment facilities. The date of
completion is in year 2025.
16
Does your jurisdiction have primary responsibility for the proposal? If not, what agency does?
j Responsible Agency: Army Corps of Engineers and Riverside County Flood
Yes 1 No X Control
FUNDING INFORMATION
Place an "X" by the proposed source of funding for this proposal
Unfunded proposal -funds are not available for the proposal at this time
E Local jurisdiction General Fund
Local jurisdiction Special Fund (road tax, assessment fees, etc.)
Non-FEMA Hazard Mitigation Funds
Local Hazard Mitigation Grant Funds- Future Request
Hazard Mitigation Funds
There are no known funding opportunities currently utilized in Public Works for the purposes of(or for)
hazard mitigation measures. The Murrieta Creek Project, currently in construction is administered by the
Army Corps of Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control. The City has been a partner in the overall
improvement project such that the construction of Main Street Bridge and future creek crossings along
Murrieta Creek would meet the most recent design standards necessary to facilitate the Murrieta Creek
Project improvements.
1 Has your jurisdiction evaluated this mitigation strategy to determine its cost benefits?
(i.e. has the cost of the mitigation proposal been determined to be beneficial in relationship to the potential
damage or loss using the attached Cost/Benefit Analysis Sheet or another internal method)
As part of this process, each Submitting Jurisdiction is required to perform a cost-benefit analysis. They were required to answer the question at
the bottom of the Proposal page that asks if they had conducted a Cost-Benefit Analysis of some type. This analysis was conducted either by
completing a Cost Benefit form or by some other approved method. Many of the jurisdictions used the cost-effective analysis approach outlined in
the FEMA publication, Cost and Benefits of Natural Hazards Mitigation. This cost-benefit analysis was not restricted to natural hazards.
In some cases, the jurisdiction or working group identified a proposal that highlighted a life- safety issue over a standard hazard proposal. This
was done when there was either historical data or other sources of information indicating that the life-safety issue needed to be emphasized or
brought to the public's attention.
17
7. LOCAL JURISDICTION DEVELOPMENT TRENDS QUESTIONNAIRE
LAND USE ISSUES-COMPLETE THE INFORMATION BELOW
This questionnaire identifies a comparison of specific land use issues between 2012, 2017 and 2022. The questionnaire also identifies the
specific threat potential to the jurisdiction in relationship to residential and commercial structures along with critical facilities. This threat potential
is focused on structural loss rather than dollar-value loss as it relates to the three main natural hazards—earthquakes,floods, and wildland fires.
The determination of dollar-value loss relating to commercial and critical facilities was found to be very limited and a difficult task to establish.
This issue will be addressed in future updates of the Plan.
The questionnaire also requires the jurisdiction to identify the process it will use to maintain their portion of the Plan.
18
LOCAL JURISDICTION DEVELOPMENT TRENDS QUESTIONNAIRE 2011
LAND USE ISSUES -COMPLETE THE INFORMATION BELOW
JURISDICTION: DOES YOUR AGENCY HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR LAND USE AND/OR DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
WITHIN YOUR JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES? YES NO
2012 DATA 2017 DATA _ 20.22
Current Population in Jurisdiction or Served 101,000 109,064 Projected Population in Jurisdiction or Served - in 2022 109,064
Current Sq Miles in Jurisdiction or Served 30.15 30.17 Projected Sq Miles in Jurisdiction or Served -in 2022 30.17
Does Your Jurisdiction have any ordinances or Yes Yes If yes, please list ordinance or regulation number.
regulations dealing with disaster mitigation, Emergency Operation Center, Emergency Operations Plan, and Local Hazard
disaster preparation, or disaster response? Mitigation Plan.
What is the number one land issue your
agency will face in the next five years
Approximate Number of Homes/A is/etc. 29,000 29,000 Projected Number of Homes/A is/etc.- in 2022 29,000
Approximate Total Residential Value 8.5 Billion 8.5 Billion Projected Residential Total Value- in 2022 8.5 Billion
Approximate Number of Commercial 3,000 3,000 Projected Number of Commercial Businesses- in 2022 3,000
Businesses
Approximate Percentage of Homes/Apts/etc in >1% >1% Approximate Percentage of Homes/Apts/etc in flood >1% $85,000,000
flood hazard zones $85,000,000 $85,000,000 hazard zones-in 2022
Approximate Percentage of Homes/Apts/etc in >1% ' >1% Approximate Percentage of Homes/Apts/etc in earthquake >1% $85,000,000
earthquake hazard zones $85,000,000 _ $85,000,000 hazard zones-in 2022
Approximate Percentage of Homes/Apts/etc in >1% >1% Approximate Percentage of Homes/Apts/etc in wildland >1% $85,000,000
wildland fire hazard zones $85,000,000 $85,000,000 fire hazard zones- in 2022
Approximate Percentage of Commercial >1% >1% Approximate Percentage of Commercial Businesses in >1%
Businesses in flood hazard zones flood hazard zones-in 2022
Approximate Percentage of Commercial 20% 20% Approximate Percentage of Commercial Businesses in 20%
Businesses in earthquake hazard zones earthquake hazard zones- in 2022
Approximate Percentage of Commercial 0% 0% Approximate Percentage of Commercial Businesses in 0%
Businesses in wildland fire hazard zones wildland fire hazard zones- in 2022
Number of Critical Facilities in your Jurisdiction See Above See Above Projected Number of Critical Facilities in your Jurisdiction See Above
that are in flood hazard zones that are in flood hazard zones-in 2022
Number of Critical Facilities in your Jurisdiction See Above See Above Number of Critical Facilities in your Jurisdiction that are in See Above
that are in earthquake hazard zones earthquake hazard zones- in 2022
Number of Critical Facilities in your Jurisdiction See Above See Above Number of Critical Facilities in your Jurisdiction that are in See Above
that are in wildland fire hazard zones. wildland fire hazard zones-in 2022
Does your jurisdiction plan on participating in Yes Yes If not, how will your jurisdiction do plan maintenance?
the County's on-going plan maintenance
program every two years as described in Part I
of the plan?
Will a copy of this plan be available for the various planning groups within your jurisdiction for use in future planning and budgeting Yes
purposes?
Projected Sq Miles in Jurisdiction or Served - in
19
APPENDIX C:
PLAN REVIEW TOOUCROSSWALK
The Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool demonstrates how the Local Mitigation Plan meets
the regulation in 44 CFR §201.6 and offers States and FEMA Mitigation Planners an
opportunity to provide feedback to the community.
• The Regulation Checklist provides a summary of FEMA's evaluation of whether the
Plan has addressed all requirements.
• The Plan Assessment identifies the plan's strengths as well as documents areas for
future improvement.
• The Multi-jurisdiction Summary Sheet is an optional worksheet that can be used to
document how each jurisdiction met the requirements of the each Element of the
Plan (Planning Process; Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment; Mitigation
Strategy; Plan Review, Evaluation, and Implementation; and Plan Adoption).
The FEMA Mitigation Planner must reference this Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide when
completing the Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool.
Jurisdiction: Title of Plan: Date of Plan:
_City of Temecula ` Local Hazard Mitigation Plan June 2017
Local Point of Contact: Address:
Roberto Cardenas 41000 Main St
Title: Temecula, CA 92590
Risk Manager
Agency:
Local Jurisdiction —City of Temecula
Phone Number: E-Mail:
951 693-3944 Roberto.cardenas@temeculaCA.gov
ov
State Reviewer: Title: Date:
FEMA Reviewer: Title: Date:
Date Received in FEMA Region pnsert#)
Plan Not Approved
Plan Approvable Pending Adoption
Plan Approved
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-1
SECTION 1:
REGULATION CHECKLIST
INSTRUCTIONS: The Regulation Checklist must be completed by FEMA. The purpose of
the Checklist is to identify the location of relevant or applicable content in the Plan by
Element/sub-element and to determine if each requirement has been 'Met' or 'Not Met.' The
'Required Revisions' summary at the bottom of each Element must be completed by FEMA
to provide a clear explanation of the revisions that are required for plan approval. Required
revisions must be explained for each plan sub-element that is 'Not Met.' Sub-elements
should be referenced in each summary by using the appropriate numbers (Al, B3, etc.),
where applicable. Requirements for each Element and sub-element are described in detail
in this Plan Review Guide in Section 4, Regulation Checklist.
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in
Plan Not
• • • Local Mitigation
ELEMENT A. PLANNING PROCESS
Al. Does the Plan document the planning process, including how it
was prepared and who was involved in the process for each
jurisdiction?(Requirement §201.6(c)(1))
A2. Does the Plan document an opportunity for neighboring
communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard
mitigation activities,agencies that have the authority to regulate
development as well as other interests to be involved in the planning
process?(Requirement§201.6(b)(2))
A3. Does the Plan document how the public was involved in the
planning process during the drafting stage?(Requirement
§201.6(b)(1))
A4. Does the Plan describe the review and incorporation of existing
plans,studies, reports,and technical information?(Requirement
§201.6(b)(3))
A5. Is there discussion of how the community(ies)will continue public
participation in the plan maintenance process?(Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(iii))
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-2
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location
Plan •
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) (section an d/or Met Met
A6. Is there a description of the method and schedule for
keeping the plan current(monitoring, evaluating and updating
the mitigation plan within a 5-year cycle)? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(i))
ELEMENT A: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
131. Does the Plan include a description of the type, location, and
extent of all natural hazards that can affect each jurisdiction(s)?
(Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i))
B2. Does the Plan include information on previous occurrences of
hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events for each
jurisdiction?(Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i))
B3. Is there a description of each identified hazard's impact on the
community as well as an overall summary of the community's
vulnerability for each jurisdiction?(Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii))
B4. Does the Plan address NFIP insured structures within the
jurisdiction that have been repetitively damaged by floods?
(Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii))
ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT C. MITIGATION STRATEGY
C1. Does the plan document each jurisdiction's existing authorities,
policies, programs and resources and its ability to expand on and
improve these existing policies and programs?(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3))
C2. Does the Plan address each jurisdiction's participation in the NFIP
and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate?
(Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(ii))
C3. Does the Plan include goals to reduce/avoid long-term
vulnerabilities to the identified hazards?(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(i)) _
C4. Does the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of
specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being
considered to reduce the effects of hazards,with emphasis on new
and existing buildings and infrastructure?(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(ii))
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-3
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location
Plan •
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) (section and/or Met Met
C5. Does the Plan contain an action plan that describes how the
actions identified will be prioritized (including cost benefit review),
implemented, and administered by each jurisdiction?(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(iv)); (Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(iii))
C6. Does the Plan describe a process by which local
governments will integrate the requirements of the mitigation
plan into other planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive
or capital improvement plans, when appropriate? (Requirement
201.6(c)(4)(ii))
ELEMENT C: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION (applicable to plan
updates only)
D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development?
(Requirement§201.6(d)(3))
D2.Was the plan revised to reflect progress in local mitigation
efforts?(Requirement§201.6(d)(3))
D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in priorities?
(Requirement§201.6(d)(3))
ELEMENT D: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION J
E1. Does the Plan include documentation that the plan has been Plan Adoption/
formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting Resolution
approval?(Requirement§201.6(c)(5)) Page 4 all plans
E2. For multi-jurisdictional plans, has each jurisdiction requesting Plan Adoption/
approval of the plan documented formal plan adoption? Resolution
(Requirement§201.6(c)(5)) Page 4 all plans
ELEMENT E: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT F. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS (OPTIONAL FOR STATE
REVIEWERS ONLY; NOT TO BE COMPLETED BY FEMA)
F1.
F2.
ELEMENT F: REQUIRED REVISIONS
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-4
SECTION 2:
PLAN ASSESSMENT
INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of the Plan Assessment is to offer the local community more
comprehensive feedback to the community on the quality and utility of the plan in a narrative
format. The audience for the Plan Assessment is not only the plan developer/local
community planner, but also elected officials, local departments and agencies, and others
involved in implementing the Local Mitigation Plan. The Plan Assessment must be
completed by FEMA. The Assessment is an opportunity for FEMA to provide feedback and
information to the community on: 1) suggested improvements to the Plan; 2) specific
sections in the Plan where the community has gone above and beyond minimum
requirements; 3) recommendations for plan implementation; and 4) ongoing partnership(s)
and information on other FEMA programs, specifically RiskMAP and Hazard Mitigation
Assistance programs. The Plan Assessment is divided into two sections:
1. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement
2. Resources for Implementing Your Approved Plan
Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement is organized according to the plan
Elements listed in the Regulation Checklist. Each Element includes a series of italicized
bulleted items that are suggested topics for consideration while evaluating plans, but it is not
intended to be a comprehensive list. FEMA Mitigation Planners are not required to answer
each bullet item, and should use them as a guide to paraphrase their own written
assessment (2-3 sentences) of each Element.
The Plan Assessment must not reiterate the required revisions from the Regulation
Checklist or be regulatory in nature, and should be open-ended and to provide the
community with suggestions for improvements or recommended revisions. The
recommended revisions are suggestions for improvement and are not required to be made
for the Plan to meet Federal regulatory requirements. The italicized text should be deleted
once FEMA has added comments regarding strengths of the plan and potential
improvements for future plan revisions. It is recommended that the Plan Assessment be a
short synopsis of the overall strengths and weaknesses of the Plan (no longer than two
pages), rather than a complete recap section by section.
Resources for Implementing Your Approved Plan provides a place for FEMA to offer
information, data sources and general suggestions on the overall plan implementation and
maintenance process. Information on other possible sources of assistance including, but
not limited to, existing publications, grant funding or training opportunities, can be provided.
States may add state and local resources.. if available.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-5
A. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement
This section provides a discussion of the strengths of the plan document and identifies
areas where these could be improved beyond minimum requirements.
Element A: Planning Process
How does the Plan go above and beyond minimum requirements to document the planning
process with respect to:
■ Involvement of stakeholders (elected officials/decision makers, plan implementers,
business owners, academic institutions, utility companies, water/sanitation districts, etc.);
■ Involvement of Planning, Emergency Management, Public Works Departments or other
planning agencies (i.e., regional planning councils);
• Diverse methods of participation (meetings, surveys, online, etc.); and
• Reflective of an open and inclusive public involvement process.
Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
In addition to the requirements listed in the Regulation Checklist, 44 CFR 201.6 Local
Mitigation Plans identifies additional elements that should be included as part of a plan's risk
assessment. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of-
1) A general description of land uses and future development trends within the community
so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions;
2) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical
facilities located in the identified hazard areas; and
3) A description of potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures, and a description of the
methodology used to prepare the estimate.
How does the Plan go above and beyond minimum requirements to document the Hazard
Identification and Risk Assessment with respect to:
• Use of best available data (flood maps, HAZUS, flood studies) to describe significant
hazards;
• Communication of risk on people, property, and infrastructure to the public (through
tables, charts, maps, photos, etc.);
• Incorporation of techniques and methodologies to estimate dollar losses to vulnerable
structures;
• Incorporation of Risk MAP products (i.e., depth grids, Flood Risk Report, Changes Since
Last FIRM, Areas of Mitigation Interest, etc.); and
• Identification of any data gaps that can be filled as new data became available.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-6
Element C: Mitigation Strategy
How does the Plan go above and beyond minimum requirements to document the Mitigation
Strategy with respect to:
• Key problems identified in, and linkages to, the vulnerability assessment;
• Serving as a blueprint for reducing potential losses identified in the Hazard Identification
and Risk Assessment;
• Plan content flow from the risk assessment(problem identification) to goal setting to
mitigation action development;
• An understanding of mitigation principles (diversity of actions that include structural
projects, preventative measures, outreach activities, property protection measures, post-
disaster actions, etc);
• Specific mitigation actions for each participating jurisdictions that reflects their unique
risks and capabilities;
• Integration of mitigation actions with existing local authorities, policies, programs, and
resources; and
• Discussion of existing programs (including the NFIP), plans, and policies that could be
used to implement mitigation, as well as document past projects.
Element D: Plan Update, Evaluation,and Implementation (Plan Updates only)
How does the Plan go above and beyond minimum requirements to document the 5-year
Evaluation and Implementation measures with respect to:
• Status of previously recommended mitigation actions;
• Identification of barriers or obstacles to successful implementation or completion of
mitigation actions, along with possible solutions for overcoming risk;
• Documentation of annual reviews and committee involvement;
• Identification of a lead person to take ownership of, and champion the Plan;
■ Reducing risks from natural hazards and serving as a guide for decisions makers as
they commit resources to reducing the effects of natural hazards;
■ An approach to evaluating future conditions (i.e. socio-economic, environmental,
demographic, change in built environment etc.);
• Discussion of how changing conditions and opportunities could impact community
resilience in the long term; and
• Discussion of how the mitigation goals and actions support the long-term community
vision for increased resilience.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-7
B. Resources for Implementing Your Approved Plan
Ideas may be offered on moving the mitigation plan forward and continuing the relationship
with key mitigation stakeholders such as the following:
• What FEMA assistance (funding) programs are available (for example, Hazard Mitigation
Assistance (HMA)) to the jurisdiction(s) to assist with implementing the mitigation
actions?
• What other Federal programs (National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Community
Rating System (CRS), Risk MAP, etc.) may provide assistance for mitigation activities?
• What publications, technical guidance or other resources are available to the
jurisdiction(s) relevant to the identified mitigation actions?
• Are there upcoming trainings/workshops (Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA), HMA, etc.) to
assist the jurisdictions(s)?
• What mitigation actions can be funded by other Federal agencies (for example, U.S.
Forest Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAH),
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Smart Growth, Housing and Urban
Development(HUD) Sustainable Communities, etc.) and/or state and local agencies?
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-8
SECTION 3:
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET (OPTIONAL)
INSTRUCTIONS: For multi-jurisdictional plans, a Multi-jurisdiction Summary Spreadsheet may be completed by listing each participating
jurisdiction, which required Elements for each jurisdiction were `Met' or `Not Met,' and when the adoption resolutions were received. This Summary
Sheet does not imply that a mini-plan be developed for each jurisdiction; it should be used as an optional worksheet to ensure that each jurisdiction
participating in the Plan has been documented and has met the requirements for those Elements (A through E).
MULTI-JURISDICTIONSUMMARY
Jurisdiction _ Requirements Met(YIN) _
Jurisdiction Type A. B. C. D. E. F.
Plan Mailing Planning Hazard Mitigation Plan Review, Plan State
# Name (city/borough/ POC Address Email Phone Process Identification& Strategy Evaluation& Adoption Require.
township/ Risk Implementation ments
village, etc.) Assessment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
9 A 9
MULTI-JURISDICTION
Jurisdiction Requirements Met(Y/N)
A. B. C. D. E. F.
Jurisdiction Type Plan Mailing Planning Hazard Mitigation Plan Review, Plan State
# Name (city/borough/ POC Address Email Phone Process Identification& Strategy Evaluation& Adoption Require-
township/ Risk Implementation ments
village,etc.) Assessment
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A - 10
ITEM NO. 3
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018 - 2022
AGENDA REPORT 1,OFTEAIZC�i
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission ' 1989
��'IrIILh+♦t N
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: May 25, 2017
SUBJECT: Item 3
Proposed Capital Improvement Program - Fiscal Years 2018-2022
Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic
RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Review and discuss the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Circulation and
Infrastructure Projects for Fiscal Years 2018-2022.
BACKGROUND: Mr. Amer Attar, Principal Engineer will provide a presentation regarding the
proposed CIP Circulation and Infrastructure Projects for Fiscal Years 2018-2022.
The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue
through the agenda notification process.
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Circulation and Infrastructure Projects for
Fiscal Years 2018-2022.
EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
CIRCULATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022
2
CIRCULATION
PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
ABBOTT CORPORATION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of roadway improvements on Motor Car Parkway,Ynez
Road, Margarita Road,and Solana Way.
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation on Motor Car Parkway,Ynez Road, Margarita Road, and Solana Way
In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and Economic Prosperity.
Project Status: This project has not yet started.
Department: Public Works/Planning-Account No.210.165.620 Level: II
5/1/2017
f 'r
,rCapital Improvement Program
47 Fiscal Years 2018-22
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the complete design and construction of four lanes on Butterfield Stage Road(from
Rancho California Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road), four lanes on Murrieta Hot Springs Road (from Butterfield Stage Road to the
City limits),and two lanes on Calle Chapos(from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Road),totaling approximately 3.2 miles of road.
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing a crucial north and south arterial road on the eastern side
of the City. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: Phase I and Phase II of this project(Murrieta Hot Springs Road to La Serena) have been completed. Phase III (La
Serena to Rancho California Road)is scheduled to be completed during Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.723 PW09-02&PW15-11 Level: I
5/11/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
DIAZ ROAD WIDENING
(Winchester Road to Rancho California Road)
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the widening of Diaz Road to four lanes,completion of misssing segments of curb&gutter,
sidewalk and landscaped medians from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road.
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by widening an important north and south major arterial road on the west
side of the City and completes a portion of the designated Western Bypass. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of
Transportation Mobility and connectivity.
Project Status: This
is a new project.
Department: Public Works-210.165.521 Level: III
P
>� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION UPGRADE PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the enhancement and upgrade of emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment at
forty (40)signalized intersections Citywide. The project includes upgrade of pre-emption optical detectors, wiring, and optical
processor cards.
Benefit/Core Value: This project enhances traffic safety and supports the long-term maintenance and rehabilitation of City
assets and infrastructure. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and
Prepared Community,and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: A priority list of project locations has been developed,and the project is anticipated to be completed in 2017
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.522 Level: 1
5/11/2017
-A-%-
It
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FLASHING BEACONS AND SPEED ADVISORY SIGNS
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project maintains the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program by installing flashing beacons
and/or speed advisory signs at school sites and neighborhoods to advise motorists of the school zone and residential speed
limits. This project includes solar powered panels, programmable timers,chargeable batteries,aluminum poles and pullboxes.
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic safety in neighborhoods and school zones. In addition, this project satisfies
the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and
Connectivity.
Project Status: The installation of flashing beacons and LED speed limit display signs is ongoing.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.670 Level: 1
5/1/2017
V^ Capital Improvement Program
( Fiscal Years 2018-22
FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY I INTERSTATE 15 OVER-CROSSING AND
INTERCHANGEIMPROVEMENTS-PHASEI
Circulation Project
Project Description:This project includes the design,right-of-way acquisition,utility relocation,and construction activities to portions
of the French Valley Parkway and Interstate 15 over-crossing and interchange.The project will add a new southbound off-ramp from
Interstate 15 to French Valley Parkway,construct the northern half of French Valley Parkway from the off-ramp to Jefferson Avenue,
widen the existing southbound off-ramp from Interstate 15 to Winchester,and construct a new auxiliary lane between French Valley
Parkway and the Winchester Road southbound off-ramp. Other features include permanent and temporary retaining walls, erosion
control and irrigation, and a new traffic signal and roadway improvements at the intersection of French Valley Parkway and Jefferson
Avenue. The project requires oversight by Caltrans and coordination with the City of Murrieta
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing another southbound off-ramp from Interstate 15 and adds
a lane to the Interstate 15 southbound off-ramp to Winchester In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of
Transportation Mobility and Connectivity
Project Status: Construction completed February 2015 Activities for project closeout include design and construction of landscape
and irrigation improvements along Auto Mall Parkway,deannexation of parcels from the North Jefferson Business Park Association,
and final survey and right-of-way documents for conveyance of project lands to Caltrans This project also includes 5-year
maintenance and monitoring of the environmental mitigation site for the overall French Valley Parkway Interchange Project.
Department: Public Works-Account No 210,165 719 PW07-04 Level: 1
5/1/2017
k
r Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/INTERSTATE 15 OVER-CROSSING AND
INTERCHANGEIMPROVEMENTS-PHASEII
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning
north of the Winchester Road Interchange on-ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215.
Benefit / Core Value: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing the northbound
collector/distributer road system. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: The environmental re-evaluation and design are estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2018-19. Construction will be
completed in future years,when funding is available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.726 PW02-11 &PW 16-01 Level: I
5/112017
iJLI I
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/INTERSTATE 15 OVER-CROSSING AND
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS-PHASE III
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the French Valley Parkway Interchange and the southbound
collector/distributor road system.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing a full service
interchange with on and off ramps in both directions In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility
and Connectivity.
Project Status: Based on funding availability,the design will begin once construction is complete for Phase II of the project.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165. Level: 1
5/1/2017
�r Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the conversion of existing Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs (IISNS)from
fluorescent tubes to an energy efficient Light Emitting Diode (LED) fixture and conversion and replacement of deficient IISNS
frames and panels. In most cases,the existing frame and sign panels will be re-used.
Benefit / Core Value: This project provides a reduction in energy consumption and costs, and supports the long-term
maintenance and rehabilitation of City assets and infrastructure. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of
Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and a Sustainable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be completed by end of Fiscal Year 2020-21.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165. Level: II
5/1/2017
-7ez
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
INTERSTATE 15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes right-of-way acquisition, design, environmental clearance, and construction of a ramp system that
will improve access to Interstate15 from Temecula Parkway/State Route 79 South.The interchange will accommodate traffic generated by
future development of the City's General Plan land use as well as regional traffic volume increases forecasted for the year 2037. This project
is crucial,as the projected traffic volume increases currently exceed the capacity of the existing interchange improvements constructed by the
Riverside County Transportation Department.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will improve circulation,freeway access,and level of service at the Interstate 15 and Temecula Parkway
/State Route 79 South intersection. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: Environmental clearance was completed in 2010. Right-of-Way acquisition and utility easements were completed in 2013.
Design and preparation of constuction Plans,Specifications, and Estimate was completed in 2016. The construction contract was advertised
and awarded in 2016-17. Construction is scheduled to start during Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Public Works-Account No. 210.165.662 PW04-08 Level: 1
5/1/2017
, Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
MEDIANS AND PARKWAYS -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: Pursuant to Conditions of Approval,this project completes the missing portions of the raised landscaped
median island on: (a) Rancho California Road between Moraga Road to Lyndie Lane($188,000), and(b)Ynez Road from Date
Street to the City boundary($100,000).
Benefit/ Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by eliminating potential conflicts between left turn movements
and through traffic on circulation element streets with a classification of major arterial or higher. In addition,this project satisfies
the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This project will reimburse developers for eligible improvements upon project completion.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.622 PW02-15 Level: III
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AT OVERLAND DRIVE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho
California Road and Winchester Road. This project also includes environmental studies, mitigation, acquisition of right-of-way, and
installation of new traffic signals at Overland Drive intersections with Diaz Road and Enterprise Circle West.
Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation and access to Overland Drive freeway over-crossing. In addition,this
project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This is a new project that will be programmed to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds starting with
Federal Fiscal Year 2017-18. At the initial funding year, the City will be working on the design, environmental document, and right-of-way
acquisition.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.648 PW16-05 Level: 1
5/1/2017
r rF 7
Capital Improvement Program
l Y Fiscal Years 2018-22
OVERLAND DRIVE EXTENSION
(COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TO WEST OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE)
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center
Drive to Murrieta Creek,just west of Enterprise Circle West. This project also includes environmental studies, acquisition of right-of-
way, new road improvements and installation of new traffic signals at Overland Drive intersections with Commerce Center Drive.
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation and access to Overland Drive freeway over-crossing. In addition,this
project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: The design of the project and the environmental document are complete. The city is working on finalizing all right-of-
way acquisitions.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.602 PW00-26&PW16-06&PW 15-13 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Anticipated Year of_
Construction/Estimated
Street Location Project Cost Fundinsa Source
Margarita Road-PW12-11 2016-17 General Fund
(Rancho California Road to Temecula Parkway) $4,325,328 Measure A
2016-17
Residential Slurry Seal-PW17-03 $2,300,000 Measure S
$6,625,328
Grind and Overlay-Citywide 2017-18
$1,828,942 Gas Tax/RMRA
$2,419,740 Measure A
$2,000,000 Measure S
$6,248,682
To Be Determined 2018-19
$1,873,515 Gas Tax/RMRA
$1,181,855 Measure A
$3,055,370
To Be Determined 2019-20
$1,910,985 Gas Tax/RMRA
$1,205,227 Measure A
$3,116,212
To Be Determined 2020-21
$1,949,205 Gas Tax/RMRA
$1,228,862 Measure A
$3,178,067
To Be Determined 2021-22
$1,988,189 Gas Tax/RMRA
$1,252,744 Measure A
$3,240,933
5/1/2017
�3
Capital Improvement Program
`[[[ Fiscal Years 2018-22
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and
reconstruction of major streets as recommended in the Pavement Management System.
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry,and
government can be met. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects is used to determine the allocation of available funding. Installations are completed
on an ongoing basis.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.655 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM -WINCHESTER ROAD
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and
reconstruction of Winchester Road, from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road, as recommended in the Pavement Management
System.
Benefit / Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business
industry, and government can be met. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and
Connectivity.
Project Status: Design is complete. Construction is scheduled to be completed during in Fiscal Year 2016-17.
Department: Public Works-Account No. 210.165.650 PW10-13 Level: 1
5/11/2017
a.a
yf
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the widening of Pechanga Parkway from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive to
provide a Principal Arterial Road with six(6)lanes of traffic. It is the intent of the project to be designed,environmentally cleared,
constructed and open to the public prior to the adjacent Pechanga Casino Expansion Project currently scheduled for completion
by January 2018.
Benefit / Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business
industry, and government can be met. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and
Connectivity.
Project Status: Design for this project started during Fiscal Year 2015-16. Construction is scheduled to start in Fiscal Year
2017-18.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.530 PW15-14 Level: 1
5/1/2017
i�
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
TRAFFIC CAMERAS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the enhancement and upgrade of existing closed circuit television cameras,fiber
optic cable,coax cable,communication equipment and Traffic Operations Center Equipment and monitors.
Benefit/Core Value: This project enhances traffic safety and supports the long-term maintenance and rehabilitation of City
assets and infrastructure. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and
Prepared Community,and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: A priority list of projects has been developed and will be used to determine the allocation of available funding.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.523 Level: 1
5/1/2017
ff
!{' Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the enhancement and upgrade of existing traffic signal equipment, including battery
back-up systems, Light Emitting Diode(LED) traffic signal indications, traffic signal controller cabinets, service cabinets, safety
street lighting, illuminated street name signs, traffic signal controllers, signal communication equipment, and closed circuit
television (CCTV) camera equipment. This project will also include an upgrade of exisiting traffic conductors including conduit,
service conductors,coax cable,and detector cable to comply with current standards.
Benefit/Core Value: This project enhances traffic safety and supports the long-term enhancements and rehabilitation of City
assets and infrastructure. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and
Prepared Community,and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: Enhancements will be completed on an ongoing basis when funding becomes available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.680 Level: 1
5/1/2017
�i
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Cost to
Signal Location Complete Year Funding Source
Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road Signal Modification(3) $ 75,000 2016-17 DIF(Traffic)
Vail Ranch Parkway at Tehachapi Pass/EI Chimisal Road(1) $ 250,000 2016-17 Developer Contributions
$ 45,000 2016-17 DIF(Traffic)
Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road(2) $ 379,968 2017-18 DIF(Traffic)
Meadows Parkway at Leena Way(2) $ 242,000 2017-18 DIF(Traffic)
De Portola Road at Campanula Way(East)(2) $ 260,000 2018-19 DIF(Traffic)
Rancho Califonia Road at Temecula Ridge(2) $ 280,000 2018-19 DIF(Traffic)
Meadows Parkway at Campanula Way(West)(2) $ 280,000 2019-20 DIF(Traffic)
Rancho California Road at Tee Drive $ 295,000 2019-20 Measure S
Rancho California Road at Promenade Chardonnay $ 55,000 2019-20 Measure S
Rancho California Road at Promenade Chardonnay $ 240,004 2019-20 Unspecified
Ynez Road at Waverly Lane $ 300.000 2020-21 Measure S
Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road $ 295,000 2021-22 Measure S
Rancho Vista Road at Avenida de la Reina a 105,000 2021-22 Measure S
Rancho Vista Road at Avenida de la Reina $ 175,000 2021-22 Unspecified
Ynez Road at Rancho Way $ 280,000 2021-22 Unspecified
$ 3,556,968
(1)Developer Contributions is$250,000
(2)DIF Traffic Developer Reimbursement
(3)Amount included in Carry over to be completed by
June 2017.
Fiscal Year 2016-17 $ 370,000
Fiscal Year 2017-18 $ 621,968
Fiscal Year 2018-19 $ 540,000
Fiscal Year 2019-20 $ 870,000
Fiscal Year 2020-21 $ 300,000
Fiscal Year 2021-22 $ 855,000
TOTAL: $ 3,556,968
5/1/2017
R Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION -CITYWIDE
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, installation and modification of traffic signals at various locations
throughout the City including: Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, Butterfield Stage Road, Meadows Parkway, Rancho Vista Road
and Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway. The project also includes reimbursement for developer installed traffic signals.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City In addition, this project satisfies the
City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City,A Safe and Prepared Community,and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: A priority list of traffic signals has been developed. The traffic signals scheduled for installation will be designed and
constructed in the scheduled fiscal year. Reimbursements for developer installed traffic signals will be made as Development Impact
Fee(DIF)traffic become available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.682 Level: 1
5/1/2017
r�
7e i L{ Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
WESTERN BYPASS BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes construction of a new bridge over Murrieta Creek at the future Western Bypass corridor
and Temecula Parkway and will extend the existing Pujol Street. It also includes constructing the new bridge and approach roadways,
curb and gutters, sidewalks, storm drain facilities, and completing all environmental studies and mitigation. The completed project will
tie the southern leg of the future Western Bypass corridor and will meet the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Murrieta Creek
Improvement Project needs.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project improves traffic safety and circulation. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of
Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: The design is complete. Construction is contingent upon the developer's participation and the appropriation of the
required additional funds.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.660 PW06-04 Level: II
5/11/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
YNEZ ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes widening Ynez Road,from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street,to two lanes in each direction,
and the completion of missing segments of curb&gutter,sidewalk,and landscaped medians
Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by widening an important arterial road in this part of the City. In addition,this
project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: The project will be completed by Fiscal Year 2018-19.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.535 Level: II
5/1/2017
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
/ �. ., •. ,.�. Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project will consolidate various site and program specific assessments of barriers preventing disabled
access to City Facilities and Programs; project will identify public facilities and programs not previously analyzed, allow for public input
in the development of a formal transition plan to prioritize removal of identified barriers over a reasonable period of time within a fiscally
constrained framework. In addition, the project also provides a study to determine the scope and costs associated with an Americans
with Disabilities Act(ADA)Transition Plan for public rights-of-way.
Benefit/Core Value: This project identifies barriers that preclude persons with any form of disability from accessing City Facilities and
Programs. The project will develop a formal transition plan to remove such barriers over time allowing greater access to City facilities
and programs. In addition, this project will determine all required ADA compliance work for all public right-of-way facilities. This project
furthers the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community, Accountable and Responsive City Government, as well as
Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: Project commenced in Fiscal Year 2014-15 and will become an ongoing program.
Department: Public Works/Building Safety-Account No.210.165.713 Level: 1
5/1/2017
131-11, Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM -CITYWIDE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: The Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan was completed in Fiscal Year 2015-16. The Master Plan
includes new and potential trail and bikeway segment information sheets that detail constraints, solutions, surface types and widths,
and estimated construction costs. The plan also details multiple recommendations including, but not limited to: new signs, gates,fence
openings, sharrows, green paint, bike boxes, separated bikeways, bicycle boulevards, striping, maps, bike racks, fix-it stations, bike
shares, bike corrals, bike lockers, cycle tracks, rapid flashing beacons, crossings, bicycle detection and actuation at signalized
intersections, pedestrian and bicycle counts, access and maintenance agreements, and trailheads. The City is a Bronze Level Bicycle
Friendly Community and this program is intended to allow for continued implementation of facilities and programs, which further the
City's commitment to proving a safe and convenient network that connects schools, parks, open space, shopping, and employment
centers.
Benefit/Core Value: This project provides alternative modes of transportation and increases connectivity and accessibility to Old
Town, Wine Country, and the City's many schools, parks, trails, and open space areas. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core
Values of A Sustainable City and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: The Master Plan was completed in Fiscal Year 2015-16 and includes a list of capital improvements throughout the
City. Improvements will be made on an ongoing basis as funding becomes available.
Department: Planning/Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.165.703 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
(7e ,jo'R Fiscal Years 2018-22
BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM
Infrastructure/Other Project
Cost to
Bike Lane and Trail Program Complete Year Funding Source
Bike Lane and Trail Program $ 561,863 2017-21 DIF(Open Space and Trails)
$ 20,000 2017-18 Beyond Grant
Bike Pump Track $ 153,000 DIF vp e:, ;: and-a
Lake Skinner Trail $ 110,000 2017-19 DIF(Open Space and Trails)
$ 1,000,000 2018-22 Measure S
Rancho California Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track $ 905 000 2021-22 Un-"-scale
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and
Interconnect $ 558,575 2021-22 AB2766
$ 147,634 2017-18 DIF(Open Space and Trails)
$ 3,330,425 2021-22 U.Spe-,rIeC!
Temecula Creek South Trail $ 240,000 2018-19 DIF(Open Space and Trails)
$ 1,050,000 2021-22 Unspecdied
Yukon to Ynez $ 313,105 2018-22 DIF(Open Space and Trails)
606.895 2021-22 Umspecihed
Multi-Use Trail-Margarita Road Undercrossing $ 300,000 2021-22 Senate Bill 821
$ 1,549,300 2021-22 Unspecified
$ 10,845,797
Fiscal Year 2016-17
Fiscal Year 2017-18
Fiscal Year 2018-19
Fiscal Year 2019-20
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Fiscal Year 2021-22
TOTAL: $ -
5/1/2017
7
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation projects at City owned and operated facilities such as the Mary
Phillips Senior Center, Community Recreation Center, Temecula Elementary School pool and locker room, Civic Center, Field
Operations Center, Maintenance Facility, TVE2, Escallier House & Barn, Harveston Center, Mercantile Building, Old Town
Parking Garage, Old Town Sixth Street Parking Lot, S.A.F.E., Temecula Children's Museum, Temecula Community Center,
Temecula Public Library,Temecula Valley Museum and the Chapel of Memories. The rehabilitation projects could include, but
are not limited to, parking lot rehabilitation and light replacements, heating ventilation and air conditioner(HVAC)upgrades, roof
repairs, carpet and flooring replacement, cabinet re-facing/replacement, concrete repairs, replacement of fencing and repair of
swimming pools.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project minimizes emergency repair costs, prolongs the service life of facilities, and upgrades
aging facility components. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and A Safe and
Prepared Community.
Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitation projects are completed on an
ongoing basis as funding becomes available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.701 Level: 1
5/1/2017
A_57
71m
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
CITYWIDE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: Prepare a report that shows all drainage courses within the City and existing drainage improvements
that have been constructed to control storm runoff. In addition,the study will include a master hydrology study and a hydraulic
study for the City showing the anticipated storm flows at build-out.
Benefit/ Core Value: The Master Drainage Plan will provide the City with sufficient up-to-date and accurate information to
systematically plan and manage its drainage systems and provide higher level of flood protection to its residents, communities,
properties, and infrastructure investments. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared
Community and A Sustainable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to start when funding becomes available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.686 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
( Fiscal Years 2018-22
CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT ACQUISITION AND
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) RETROFIT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: Phase I of this project is to purchase the Southern California Edison (SCE) owned streetlights within the City's
boundary, including the light poles, mast arms, and light fixtures. Phase II of this project includes retrofitting the purchased lights with
an Light Emitting Diode(LED)lighting system.
Benefit/Core Value: This project provides for the opportunity to reduce facilities costs, reduce energy usage and extend the life of
lighting infrastructure. This project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City.
Project Status: This is a new project for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Phase II is estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2018-19.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.688 Level: 1
5/11/2017
4_
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: The Citywide Camera Surveillance system will be utilized by the City to support public safety, traffic
management, and asset protection activities in service to its citizens. The City's goal for the system is to standardize and integrate
existing and new video management systems to provide video technology to improve overall safety and security to the residents of the
City.
Benefit/Core Value: To protect property and life. This project provides Police the ability to perform virtual patrols, maximizing staff
efficiency and resources. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City,A Safe and Prepared
Community and A Sustainable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by the end of FY 2018-19.
Department: Information Technology-Account No.210.165.711 Level: 1
5/1/2017
(e-
`�- a
A-?ii
rCapital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project provides communication infrastructure (radio, antenna, cable, power) to the City's Emergency
Operations Center (EOC). Located at the Civic Center, the EOC provides a centralized location where public safety, emergency
response, and support agencies coordinate planning, preparedness, and response activities in the event of a large scale
emergency,thus ensuring the continuity of City operations.
Benefit/Core Value: This project provides the City's Emergency Operations Center with communication capabilities in the event
of a large scale emergency. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be completed by the end of Fiscal Year 2018-19.
Department: City Manager-Account No.210.165.765 Level: 1
5/1/2017
/ `� Capital Improvement Program
( Fiscal Years 2018-22
EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER& PLANT MATERIAL CONVERSION PROJECT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the administration,design and construction of six(6)sites within the City for the conversion
of water facilities from potable to recycled water. This effort is in cooperation with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) to
administer the implementation of improvements in association with the State of California Department of Water Resources Proposition
84 Grant Agreement.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will reduce use of potable water, increase overall water savings and enhance energy efficiencies
and potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City, a Healthy and
Livable City and Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: This is a new project for Fiscal Year 2017-18. It is estimated to be complete by June 2018.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.689 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Y Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM UPGRADE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project will install optic communication system upgrades including, conduit, cable, controllers and
related communication equipment to improve safety and operations with optimized traffic signal timing coordination. Signalized
intersections will be improved along the Winchester Road, Rancho California Road and Temecula Parkway corridors.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will upgrade the City's communications system equipment. In addition,this project satisfies the
City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community.
Project Status: This project has not yet started.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.550 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FIRE STATION 84 TRAINING ROOM IMPROVEMENT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the proposed Fire Station 84 to renovate the training room
that hosts a variety of classes for the community and City meetings. This project will provide technology upgrades,window replacement,
storage renovations and the classroom tool replacement.
Benefit/Core Value: This improvement will create better learning experience for our community members that attend these classes for
training. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community,A Sustainable City,and Accountable
and Responsive City Government
Project Status: This a new project and is anticipated to be completed in Fiscal year 2017-18.
Department: Fire Services-Account No.210.165.687 Level: II
5/1/2017
f' Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FIRE STATION 95 RORIPAUGH RANCH SITE- PHASE II
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: The acquisition,design and construction of the Fire Station at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Calle
Chapos is complete. The second phase of this project will provide the necessary equipment needed in order for the Fire Station to be
fully operational.
Benefit/Core Value: This project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community
Project Status: The construction for this project is complete.
Department: Fire Services-Account No.210.165.753 Level: II
5/1/2017
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
INTERSTATE 15 BRANDING AND VISIONING -CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR PLAN
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: The project includes the landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 Corridor, between French Valley Parkway
and Temecula Parkway,including each interchange to implement the Interstate 15 Branding and Visioning-Landscape Corridor Plan in
association with Visit Temecula Valley.
Benefit/Core Value: This project meets the Citywide long-term goals as identified in the Quality of Life Master Plan to include a
Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity.
Project Status: This project is in the conceptual phase.
Department:Public Works-Account No.210.165.690 Level: I
1�
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
LIBRARY PARKING -PHASE II
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the study, design, and construction of alternatives to provide additional parking for the
Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library. Phase II covers the design, solar energy equipment and construction of an expansion
of the current on-site parking facility. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment(FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, Public
Wi-Fi and other identified Information Technology needs.
Benefit/Core Value: This project provides additional parking for library patrons, meetings, and special programs. In addition,
this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: Phase II Design started in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and construction of the expansion will start in Fiscal Year 2017-
18.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.153 PW13-09 Level: II
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
MAIN STREET PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: Performs site improvements on parcels 922-036-039 and 922-036-040, adjacent to the Temecula Community
Theater and Pennypickles's Workshop to include general plumbing and electrical relocations and repairs, installation of landscaping and
various hardscape components.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will enhance the newly acquired City property. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value
of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by June 30,2018.
Department: Public Works-Accounts No.210.165.691 Level: 1
5/1/2017
C3`
Q Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project consists of construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the
former YMCA building. The project may include the demolition of the existing building and pool constructing a new 6,000 square foot
building as determined by a feasibility study. Phase II covers the design and construction of an expansion of the current on-site parking
facility. The Information Technology Equipment covers camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified
Information Technology needs.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project will provide the City a new facility to meet the increasing demands of recreational programs. In
addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City and A Safe and Prepared Community.
Project Status: This is a new project,expected to be completed in Fiscal Year 2018-19
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.692 Level: 1
5/1/2017
f It
Q Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
MEDIANS AND ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN BARRIERS -CITYWIDE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of raised concrete medians (with stamped concrete),
neighborhood identification medians, pedestrian bulb-outs, and ornamental pedestrian barriers to provide neighborhood traffic
calming and enhance pedestrian crossing at locations such as Deer Hollow Way,Seraphina Road, Nighthawk Pass, Roripaugh
Road, Suzi Lane, Chandler Drive and other locations within the City.
Benefit / Core Value: This project provides neighborhhod traffic calming and a safe crossing for pedestrians at various
locations within the City. This project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community,A Sustainable City,
and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This project has a priority list of locations and will be constructed when funding is available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210 165.704 Level: II
5/11/2017
i
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the proposed United States Army Corps of
Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control improvements to the Murrieta Creek within the City limits. This project also
includes the study, design, and construction of alternatives to reconfigure the existing Southside Parking Lot which has been
impacted by the Riverside County Flood Control's acquisition of a portion of the parking lot.
Benefit/Core Value: This project helps prevent flooding of Old Town Temecula. In addition, this project satisfies the City's
Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community and A Sustainable City.
Project Status: The City is working with Riverside County to form a Joint Powers Authority to further the implementation of
this project. Construction of Phase 11,just south of Rancho California Road to south of First Street bridge, started Fall 2015.
Design for the parking lot reconfiguration has begun and the City is working with the adjacent property owners to ensure that
the new parking design will maximize the number of parking spaces.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.735 PW15-07 Level: 1
5/1/2017
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
OLD TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project will include the design and eventual construction of a new parking structure in Old Town.
The Old Town parking management Plan outlines a number of parking strategies that can be implemented in Old Town over
time. Additional parking structures are anticipated to be constructed as part of the long term parking management strategy.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will satisfy the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity.
Project Project
Status: This project will start in Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.694 Level: III
5/1/2017
r. Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
OLD TOWN STREET LIGHTING LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) CONVERSION
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project provides for the retrofit and replacement of existing Street lighting components with new Light
Emitting Diode(LED)technology in Old Town Temecula.
Benefit/Core Value: This project enhances the safety, reduces light pollution and increases energy efficiency in Old Town. In
addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthly and Livabale City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and
Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: The project is estimated to be complete by June 30,2018.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.695 Level: 1
5/1/2017
y
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PECHANGA PARKWAY ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, and implementation of an environmental mitigation site
required for the Pechanga Parkway Project, including acquisition and planting of the mitigation site in Temecula Creek. In addition,
this project provides water to plant material and monitoring the mitigation site for five years.
Benefit / Core Value: This project increases environmental mitigation areas. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core
Value of A Sustainable City.
Project Status: The design and construction of new wetlands was completed during Fiscal Year 2014-15. Upon the approval of
the resource agencies, the maintenance of the created area is estimated to be completed by the end of Fiscal Year 2018-19.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.516 PW11-01 Level: 1
5/1/2017
7�
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PUBLIC SAFETY MONUMENT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: To identify suitable location in park space/public for an acknowledgement and tribute to the men and
women who serve as first responders in Police, Fire and emergency service occupations. The design of such a tribute would
be in partnership with public safety personnel and serve as a reminder to residents of their dedication and sacrifice to
maintaining the safety of our community.
Benefit/Core Value: To honor Fire and Police. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Sustainable City,
and Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: Project will be funded with funding becomes available.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165 Level: II
5/11/20117
31 '
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
RONALD H. ROBERTS TEMECULA PUBLIC
LIBRARY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: The project is for the rehabilitation of the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library to included interior
and exterior painting, carpet cleaning, IT infrastructure upgrade, Audio Visual, furnishing, fixtures, equipment replacement and
enhancements.
Benefit / Core Value: The project prolongs the service life of the facility, upgrades, aging technology, infrastructure and
improves energy efficiencies. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by June 2018.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.773 Level: 1
5/1/2017
I
Jl�
Capital Improvement Program
[ Fiscal Years 2018-22
SIDEWALKS -CITYWIDE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project will include the construction of sidewalks at various locations throughout the City.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of
Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and A Sustainable City.
Project Status: A study to identify areas with missing sidewalks and prioritize them is being finalized. Based on the study and the
available resources sidewalks will be constructed in the selected areas.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.708 Level: 1
5/1/2017
C --_ ,+ Capital Improvement Program
t �' Fiscal Years 2018-22
SIDEWALKS -OLD TOWN BOARDWALK ENHANCEMENT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project will establish programs that will remove boardwalk plank boards and replace them with colored
concrete sidewalks (San Diego buff colors) stamped with wood grain finish similar to what was installed with the new Main Street
bridge.
Benefit/Core Value: This project promotes a sustainable walkable surface that will require little maintenance. It will also promote
a "walkable"community by connecting the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable
City and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This project will start in Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.696 Level: II
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
SIDEWALKS -OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project is composed of two phases. The first phase, part of the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Community
Development Block Grant(CDBG)funding Action Plan include adding new sidewalks on(1)east side of Old Town Front Street from
Moreno(Penfold) to Moreno (Post Office), and (2)south side of Fifth Street from Mercedes Street to Old Town Front Street. The
second phase, CDBG Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2016-17 include new sidewalks on the east side of Mercedes Street from Sam
Hicks Park to Fourth Street.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core
Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This project is expected to be completed in Fiscal Year 2016-17
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.766 PW15-06 Level:1
5/1/2017
i �.
Capital Improvement Program
fff Fiscal Years 2018-22
SIDEWALKS -SIXTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes adding new sidewalks on the north side of Sixth Street between Mercedes Street and
Mary Phillips Senior Center.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core
Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This project started in Fiscal Year 2016-17
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.555 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
SIDEWALKS -YNEZ ROAD
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes new sidewalks on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and County Center
Drive.
Benefit/Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value
of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.
Project Status: This is a new project for Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Public Works -Account No.210.165.775 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
TEEN VILLAGE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: The initial phase of this project consisted of hiring a consultant to review the current teen center located at the
Community Recreation Center in Ronald Reagan Sports Park. The resulting plan provides a design and construction proposal for a
"Teen Village"comprising of 6,820 square feet central building, extensive outdoor activities, and improvements of the existing CRC,
Amphitheater,Skate Park,as well as connections to adjacent neighborhoods.
Benefit / Core Value: This project will create a safe, engaging place for teens to participate in individual and group social,
recreational, physical,and educational activities. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: The design and construction phase of the project will commence in Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.122 Level: 1
5/1/2017
e`j. °+ = �* ( Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the acquisition of property, design, and construction of a Park and Ride facility in the vicinity
of Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment(FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, and other
identified Information Technology needs.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project enables and encourages Temecula residents to carpool when commuting. In addition, this project
satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City.
Project Status: The project is anticipated to be complete in Fiscal Year 2017-16.
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.747 PW06-09 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING-CITYWIDE
Infrastructure/Other Project
Project Description: This project includes the undergrounding of utilities at various locations throughout the City to extend the
undergrounding done by the developers beyond the limits of their developments. The requested funding for Fiscal Year 2017-18 will cover the
following two locations: 1) approximately 600 LF in front of Julian Charter School (located at 29141 Vallejo Avenue) between two private
developments (the Gateway Development and Hope Lutheran Church); 2) approximately 250 LF on Third Street just east of Old Town Front
Street and west of the proposed hotel.
Benefit/ Core Value: Undergrounding of this 600 LF segment of existing overhead utility lines along Vallejo Avenue will result in a total of
2,000 LF of utility undergrounding as the two adjacent private developments will improve their frontage overhead utilities as well. Also, the
utilities on Third Street, between Mercedes and Old Town Front will be undergrounded as a result of the proposed hotel and this project. In
addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City.
Project Status: Theis anew project for Fiscal Year 2017-18
Department: Public Works-Account No.210.165.776 Level: II
5/112017
PARKS & REC
PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: As exhibits and play experiences in the Children's Museum become outdated, this project allows for the
re-design and replacement of exhibit areas or refurbishment of existing exhibits. This process provides the museum visitor new
and updated play experiences.
Benefit/Core Value: This project enhances existing exhibit areas of the Children's Museum. In addition,this project satisfies
the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be completed by end of FY 2017-18.
Department: Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.125 Level: II
5/11/2017
i
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER(CRC) POOL SITE
ENHANCEMENTS AND RENOVATIONS
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project includes the removal, replacement of pool decking, pool re-plaster, and the installation of an
enhanced lighting system with energy efficient LED fixtures.
Benefit/Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and facilities. This project satisfies the City's
Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City,A Safe and Prepared Community and Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by June 2018.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.116 Level: I
5/1/2017
a.�
wdo
Capital Improvement Program
((( Fiscal Years 2018-22
COMMUNITY SERVICES MASTER PLAN
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: The Community Services Department's prior Master Plans (Youth, 2008, Cultural Arts, 1999; and Parks
and Recreation, 1993) no longer adequately address the services,facilities, and parks currently managed by the department; nor
do these documents reflect current demographic, statutory, financial, and social factors. The Community Services master Plan
will provide a pathway for the future, taking into account the existing capacity, location, and condition of facilities, programs, and
parks as well as the needs and desires of City residents.
Benefit / Core Value: This project will create a comprehensive Master Plan to enable the orderly and consistent planning,
acquisition, development, and administration of the City's Community Services facilities, programs, and parks. It will also protect
the City's existing investment in these resources. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable
City,A Safe and Prepared Community and Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: The Community Services Master Plan will be conducted as resources are identified.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.117 Level: II
5/1/2017
C -11, 4(
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FALLEN HEROES MEMORIAL
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: To construct a memorial honoring the fallen heroes of our community representing all service branches of the
military. Project is to be located at the Temecula Duck Pond park site adjacent to the Veteran's Memorial and paver walkway.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project meets the Quality of Life Master Plan goals and objectives and satisfies the City's Core Value of a
Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be completed by June 30,2018.
Department: Public Works/City Manager's Office-Account No.210.190.115 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Alu,
i Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between specific park sites and flood control
channels, and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park sites. A report for Pala Community Park, Margarita
Community Park, and Long Canyon Creek Park was developed. The funding identified through Fiscal Year 2018-19 covers the
construction work required to protect Pala Park. The Future Years funding is to protect Margarita and Long Canyon Community
Parks.
Benefit/Core Value: This project prevents further erosion into specific park sites. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core
Value of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: A study of the affected parks was completed in Fiscal Year 2014-15. Design and construction of the recommended
fixes will be implemented based on available funds. Design for Pala Park was completed in Fiscal Year 2015-16. Environmental
process will be done during Fiscal Year 2016-17.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.127 PW11-10 Level: 1
5/1/2017
Ak
y� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation and improvement projects at City parks such as Ronald Reagan
Sports Park, Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park, Pala Community Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park,
Loma Linda Park, and Butterfield Stage Park. The rehabilitation and improvement projects could include, but are not limited to,
parking lot repairs and resurfacing, raised and cracked concrete sidewalk replacement, fencing repair and replacement,
landscaping and irrigation system efficiency upgrades, lighting system repairs and efficiency upgrades, on-site drainage
improvements and other similar projects.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this
project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and
Responsive City Government.
Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitations are completed on an ongoing
basis.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.130 Level: 1
511/2017
-1]
/ Capital Improvement Program
C Fiscal Years 2018-22
PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL SPORTS PARK SYNTHETIC TURF REPLACEMENT
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project includes the replacement of the synthetic turf and infill material at each of the four synthetic
turf sports fields at Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park. The replacement of the synthetic turf will include maintenance for the next
eight years.
Benefit/Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition,this project
satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and
Responsive City Government.
Project Status: The replacement of the synthetic turf for the four fields will be performed between June and August 2017
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services 210.190.119 Level: 1
5/1/2017
7i�
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAFETY SURFACING
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project includes the re-design, and enhancement of playground equipment and safety surfacing at
existing City parks to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of parks. The City park
playground include sites such as Pala Community Park, Nicolas Road Park, John Magee Park, Butterfield Stage Park, Long
Canyon Creek Park, Paseo Gallante Park, Riverton Park, Redhawk Community Park, Bahia Vista, Rotary Park, Stephen Linen
Park, Sunset Park, Temecula Creek Trail Park, Temeku Hills Park, Vail Ranch Park, Veterans Park, Winchester Creek Park,
Calle Aragon Park and Patricia H. Bridsall Sports Park.
Benefit/ Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition,this
project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and
Responsive City Government.
Project Status: The enhancement of playground equipment and safety surfacing will be performed at one to two sites per year
A priority list has been developed and enhancement will be completed on an ongoing basis.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.120 Level: II
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
t Fiscal Years 2018-22
PUBLIC RESTROOM RENOVATION
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project is for the renovation of various park sites' public restroom facilities to include new floor tile,
sealer/anti-graffiti coating, energy efficient lighting upgrades, and repairs and replacement of plumbing fixtures and equipment.
A total of ten locations are to be improved, including Sam Hicks Monument Park, Sixth Street restrooms, Ronald Reagan Skate
Park, Patricia H.Bridsall Sports Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Temeku Hills Park, and Harveston Lake Park. An additional 23
locations to be included in Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Benefit / Core Value: This project enhances and upgrades aging facility components and prolongs the service life of the
restroom facilities. This project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, and A Safe and Prepared
Community.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by June 2018.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No. 210.190.155 Level: I
5/1/2017
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK RESTROOM EXPANSION AND RENOVATION
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project provides for the design and construction of the restroom building expansion at Ronald Reagan
Sports Park. The restroom expansion includes adding additional restroom stalls and urinals, renovating the snack bar, and
enlarging the storage case. In addition, this project includes the renovation of North/South Baseball restroom and snack bar
building to include new roof,cabinets,fixtures and other building improvements.
Benefit/Core Value: This project provides additional facilities for park patrons. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core
Values of a Healthy and Livable City,A Safe and Prepared Community and Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by Fiscal Year 2017-18.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.114 Level: 1
5/1/2017
i.i
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK PLAYGROUND ENHANCEMENT
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project includes the purchase and installation of a new innovative play area with a historical theme to
replace the existing equipment, including removal of old equipment and installation of new ADA compliant surfacing. The
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, Public Wi-Fi and other identified Information
Technology needs.
Benefit/Core Value: This project provides an enhanced play environment and improved access for disabled. In addition,this
project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be completed by the end of Fiscal Year 2016-17
Department: Public
Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.132 PW12-20 Level: 1
5/1/2017
� Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING LIGHT EMITTING DIODE(LED) CONVERSION
Parks and Recreation Project
Project Description: This project provides for the replacement of the aging sports field lighting components with new LED
technology at various sports parks. The parks may include Paloma Del Sol, Pala Park, and Ronald Reagan Sports Park.
Benefit/Core Value: This project enhances the safety of sport field users, reduces unnecessary light pollution and increases
energy efficiency at City parks. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe
and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government.
Project Status: This project is estimated to be complete by Fiscal Year 2018-19.
Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services-Account No.210.190.113 Level: 1
5/1/2017
SARDA
PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2018-22
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (SARDA)
/Housing Project
Project Description: This project serves as a placeholder for the proceeds remaining from the 2010 and 2011 Tax Allocation
Housing Bonds, issued by the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency. Once a specific project is identified, staff will bring
forward a recommendation to the Oversight Board and SARDA for formal approval.
Benefit/ Core Value: The specific Benefit/Core Value will be identified when the funds are appropriated to a specific capital
project.
Project Status: Not Applicable.
Department: SARDA-Account No.380.800.815 Level: I
TRAFFIC ENGINEER' S
REPORT
1989 t MEMORANDUM
TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works
FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent— PW Streets.
DATE: May 1, 2017
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for April, 2017
CC: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant
Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer— Land Development
Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer-Traffic
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of April, 2017.
The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by
both in house crews and maintenance contractors.
Attachments:
Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division
Street Maintenance Detail Report
Contracted Maintenance Work Completed
Graffiti Removal Chart
MEMORANDUM
TO: Patrick Thomas,Director of Public Works
FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent .
W.
DATE: May 1, 2017
1�3H�1
St I BJ EC'T: Monthly Activity Report April, 2017
The following activities were performed by Street Maintenance Division personnel for the month of April,2017:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 33
B. Total signs installed 9
C. Total signs repaired 38
D. Banners Replaced 0
11, TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 10
III ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A.C.repairs 3,823
B. Total Tons 20
IV CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 29
B. Down Spouts 0
C. Under sidewalks 0
D. Bowls 0
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 550
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 33
B. Total S.F. 2,191
VII. STENCILING
A.22 New and Repainted Legends
B. 18,612 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
C. 0 Bull Nose
D. 0 Thermal Plastic
E. 0 RPMs Installed
R�NAINI AINNOAC NUT
Also,City Maintenance staff responded to 56 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,tree trimming,sign
repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 73 service order requests for the
month of March,2017.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 89 hours of overtime which includes standby time,special events and response to
street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 2017 was $U0,603.,17
compared to$40,812.50 for the month of March,2017.
Account No.5402 $ 3,399.00
Account No.5401 $
Account No.999-5402 $ 223,204.37
Electronic Copies:
Patrick Thomas,City Engineer - Director of Public Works
Amer Attar, Principal Engineer - Capital Improvements
Mayra De La Torre,Senior Engineer - Land Development
Jerry Gonzalez,Associate Engineer - Traffic Division
R\MAIMI'AINMOACTRPT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted: May 1,2017
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT Submitted By: Patrick Thomas
STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
- 4TH QUARTER - Apr 17 141ay-17 Jun-17 FISCAL YEAR TO DATE
- -f- - — - '- --- _ TO
WORK WORK WORK j WORN TOTAL COST
SCOPE OF WORK Unit Cost COMPLETED COST COMPLETED COST COMPLETED COST I COMPLETED COST FOR LAST
I FISCAL YEAR
ASPHALT CONCRETE: l
Square Footage: S2511, 3,823 $ 11,354.31 0 $ 0 $ j 0 $ 46,631.97 S 58,090.23
Tons: 20 0 0 I 169
Parking Lot Slurry Seal Square Footage: I
Gallons i I
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE: l
Square Footage: $297 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ I 0 $ _
PCC Yards: 0 0 0 I 0
STRIPING&PAVEMENT MARKING'S'
Red curb&Striping(linear feet): $0.07 18,612 $ 1,302.84 0 $ 0 S j 37,860 :$ 2,650.20 $ 218.40
New&Repainted Legends(each): $800 22 $ 176.00 0 $ 0 5 i 1,717 $ 13,736.00 5 18,136.00
Bull Noses(each): $007 0 $ 0 $ 0 5 I 338 :$ 23.66 8
Raised Pavement Markers-RPM'S(each): 0 00 r 170
-ermo Plastic Legends(each) 0 0 0 I 0
SIGNS d.BANNERS
t
No of Signs REPLACED: S2639 33 $ 870.87 0 $ 0 5 I 599 5 15,807.61 $ 22,537.06
Material(cost per sign): $6000 s 1,650.00 $ - :$ 1 S 29,950.00 $ 42,700.00
No of Signs INSTALLED: $2639 9 $ 237.51 0 $ 0 ; t 154 S 4,064.06 $ 5,225 22
Material(cost per sign): $5000 $ 450.00 $ i; :S 7,700.00 $ 9,900.00
No of Signs REPAIRED: $2639 38 $ 1,002.82 0 $ 0 $ 239 5 6,307.21 $ 18,077.15
Material(cost per sign): $5000 $ 1,900.00 $ >$ t S 11,950.00 $ 34,260.00
t
No of BANNERS installed: $26390 $ 0 $ 0 i$ 582 $ 15,358.98 8 20,452.25
Christmas Wreaths installed $2639
1 0 $ 8
GRAFFM REMOVAL — W
No of Locations 33 0 0 0 775
Square Fa 2,191 0 0 0 30569
DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANED
Catch Basins: $2639 29 1$ 765.31 0 1$ 0 ;$ I 796 $ 21,006.44 $ 23,249.59
Down Drains: $2639 0 i$ 0 $ 0 f$ I 25 $ 659.75 $ 1,820.91
Under sidewalk Drains $2639 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ j 267 $ 7,046.13 $ 11,926.28
Detention Basins: $2639 0 $ 0 i$ 0 ;$ 1 12 $ 316.68 $ 1,530.62
Brdge Deck Drains $26 391 0 :S I
TREES TRIMMED
No of Trees Trimmed $26-39 10 s 263.90 0 $ 0 :$ 1 180 s 4.750.20 S 1¢•203.46
R.O.W.WEED ABATEMENT
Area Abated(square feet) $0¢34 550s 18.70 0 1$ 0 i$ 1 7 155 -$ 243.27 8 432.88
The Street Maintenance Division also responds to service requests Tor a variety of other reasons,the total number of Service Order Requests,some of which include work reported above is reported monthly.
SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS
N0-of SOR's -- - - —-- - - ¢ 0 _ 1 881 743
Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division are on-call and respond to alter hours emergencies or support City sponsored special events 1
1 ,
I
Overtime Hours: S=• 89 $ 3,523.51 0 '$ 0 is 1,462 $ 57,860.79 8 49,814.47
-- — — TOTALS: 25,510 $ 23,515.77` 0 $ 0 $ 1 52,606 ;$ 249,062,95 8 333,566.32
R:WIAINTAINW10ACRPTUULY AUG SEPT
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The followirig contractors have performed the following projects for the month of April, 2017
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT YEREEX&IHANNELIBRIME OF WORK SIZE
CONTRACTOR: Hardy&Harper Inc.
Date: 1/12/17
#43689 Winchester @ Enterprise Circle 3" Grind& Replace of Asphalt
South
TOTAL COST $37,542.50
Date:4/12/17 Southbound Margarita South of
#43690 Winchester Rd. 3" Grind& Replace of Asphalt
TOTAL COST $47,128.55
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
CONTRACTOR. West Coast Arborists, Inc.
Date:3/31/17 Citywide Annual ROW tree trimming
# 121482
TOTAL COST $1,749.00
Date:4/15/17 Citwtde
Tree&Stump Removal
# 124849
TOTAL COST $1,650.00
CONTRACTOR:Pacific Striping, Inc.
Date:4/5/17 Citywide Annual Citywide Striping Program
# 19
TOTAL COST $138,533.32
Date:
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402
RiMA1NTA1M1A0ACTRPT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted: May 1,2017
CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED Submitted By: Patrick Thomas
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell
SCOPE OF WORK JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Yee r to Date
ASPHALT CONCRETE
3"Grinc&Replace(asphalt) 0 0 0 0 _ 0 _ 0 0
Cost $ - $ - $ - $ 84,671.05 $ - $ $ 84,671.05
ANNUAL SPRAYS
Annual Spraying of Pre/Post Herbicides Cost $ 17,975.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 47,!90.00
DRAINAGE FACILITIES I
Channels(each) 0 00 0 0 0 0
Cost ,a --- ao,000.o ......._, ---------------------- -- -----
0 0 $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ 40,000.00
STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Striping(linear feet) 0 0 — -—0 - W 0 0 00
•----- ------ _ ...._....
--
Sandblasting(linear feet) r0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Legends(each) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cost $ - $ $ - $ 138,533.32 $ $ • $ 136,533.32
TREES
Trees Trimmed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trees/Stumps Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f
Tree Planting 0
Cost $ 1,320.00 $ 20,629.00 $ 14,974.00 $ 3,399.00 $ - $ $ 95,522.00
WEED ABATEMENT
ROW Area Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 $
Other Public Lands Abated(Square Feet) _0 0 0 0 0 0 $
Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ $ 2,890.00
MISC.MAINT ACTIVITES
Misc cleanup(mowing/debris/sand/etc.) Cost $ $ 40.000.00 $ $ $ - $ $ 98,405.00
------------
Pre-emergent spraying Cost $ $ 2,010.00 $ -18,838.50 $ $ - $ - $ 20,648.50
Install 1/4 ton rip rap Cost $ - $ - $ 139000.00 $ $ - _$ - $ 13 000.00
Repair Roadway Cost $ - $ - $ _� $ . $ $ � $ _
Sandbags Cost , $ - $ _ - $
Misc.concrete work Cost $ - $ $ $ $ $ _ — $
-...__.— ------ __.....__•.. •-•---_ . — -
Channel cleanout(Homeless/Debris/etc.) Cost $ - $ 2,690.00 $ - $ $ - $ $ 2,690.00
TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS 1 $ 59.295.00 1 $ 65,329.00 $ 46,812.50 $ 226,603.37 $ Is $ 544,449.87
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
FISCAL YEAR 2016 - 2017
Month
Number I Square 10,000 100
of Calls Footage
9,000 90
Jul 53 2,424
Aug 89 3,504 8,000 so
Sep 37 865 7,000 - 70
Oct 38 1,217 ; 6,000 — - — 60 N
Nov 19 1,261 2 5,000 - 50 0
M
Dec 31 1,436 Ith 4 000 — 40 6
Jan 52 2,389
3,000 30
Feb 52 1,468
Mar 65 8,758 2,000 - 20
Apr 33 2,191 1,000 - 10
May 0 - - - o
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Totals 469 25,513 Square - Number
Footage of Calls
POLICE CHIEF' S REPORT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT
_
TEMECULA POLICE
CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT
To: Southwest Station Admin
From- Marianna Kuhn, Crime analyst
Date: May 2, 2017
Re: Part 1 crimes for the City of Temecula
April 1 — 30, 2017
Total Part 1 calls for service: 327. A less than 1% increase from the previous month (325)
Temecula Police Department Part 1 Calls for Service
April 1 - 30, 2017
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Rape Robbery Veh Theft
Total 22 28 243 3 5 26
UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category
Non-Written incidents: 55
Written incidents: 272
Total calls for service: 327
Data warehouse was used to prepare this information.
City of Temecula Traffic Statistics
April 2017
Citation Totals
Total Hazardous Citations 957
Total Non-Hazardous Citations 523
Parking Citations 125
Total Citations 1605
Citation Breakdown
S.L.A.P. 183
N.E.T. Citations 55
School Zones 61
Seatbelt Citations 28
Community Presentations 2
Traffic Collisions
Non-Injury 34
Hit and Run 13
Injury 27
Fatal 2
Total 2
Pedestrian Related Collisions: 3
Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report.
D.U.1. Arrests
D.U.I. Arrests 17
Total cell phone cites 237
(23123 & 23124 CVC)
Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/Click it or Ticket Operations/Special Operations
City-Wide red light enforcement(S.L.A.P.)
DUI Checkpoint-April 28th
State-Wide Distracted Driver Enforcement
Prepared by Corporal B. De Loss#2914
May 4,2017
Commission Members May 4,2017
City of Temecula
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
41000 Main Street
Temecula,CA 92590
Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Traffic Division Activities/Events
Dear Commission Members:
Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of April,2017. These activities include the
following:
Citation statistics(attachment)
P Part 1 Crimes(attachment)
i Community Action Patrol supported call-outs:
April 7,2017—Ynez Road x Tierra Vista,fatal traffic collision. Two CAP members/CAP vehicles.
April 21, 2017 —Temecula Pkwy x Margarita Rd, traffic collision. Three CAP members / CAP
vehicles.
• CAP Meetings: No staff meeting
CAP Monthly Meeting: April 13,2017—Annual Volunteer Appreciation potluck. Chief Kubel, Lt.
McConnell and fifteen CAP members in attendance.
Community Action Patrol activity/patrol hours:
669 hours for April,2017. Year-to-date total: 2,580 hours.
*There were 15 CAP patrols with 21 members participating.
4 Training: None.
i Special Events:
April 5,2017—National Crime Victim Vigil at City Hall. Four CAP members on patrol
April 8,2017—Reality Rally in Old Town. Three CAP members on foot patrol
April 14,2017—Good Friday Walk the Cross event. Eight CAP members,three CAP vehicles
April 22,2017—Wolf Creek 3`d annual Safety Fair. Two CAP members,one CAP vehicle
April 25,2017—Harveston Neighborhood Watch Mtg. Three CAP members,three CAP vehicles
April 27,2017—Every 15 Minute program at NHS. Eight CAP members,3 CAP vehicles
April 28,2027—DUI Checkpoint,Jefferson Ave x Del Rio. Six CAP members
If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula
Police Department,Traffic Division—(951)696-3072.
Sincerely,
Corporal Bryan De Loss
Temecula Police Department—Traffic Division
FIRE CHIEF' S REPORT
Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE
Emergency Incident Statistics
f �
PROM
eve
John R. Hawkins
Fire Chief
5/4/2017
Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department
Communications and Technology Division
GIS Section
Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion,Station,Jurisdiction
Incidents Reported for the month of April,2017 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6
"Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in.
Response Activity
Incidents Reported for the month of April,2017 and Temecula City
m False Alarm 73 103%
Haz Mat 3 0.4%
■ Medical 486 688%
a Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire 2 0.3%
i Other Fire 8 1.1%
Other Misc 2 0.3%
1AP ■Public Service Assist 39 5.5%
a Res Fire 2 0.3%
■Rescue 1 0.1%
■ Ringing Alarm 3 0.4
i Standby 12 1.7%
Traffic Collision 71 10.1%
Vehicle Fire 1 0.1%
■Alldland Fire 3 04%
Total: 706 100.0%
False Alarm 73
Haz Mat 3
Medical
486
Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire 2
Other Fire
8
Other Misc
2
Public Service Assist 39
Res Fire 2
Rescue
1
Ringing Alarm 3
Standby 92
Traffic Collision 71
Vehicle Fire 1
Wildland Fire 3
Incident Total: 706
Average Enroute to Onscene Time*
Enroute Time=When a unit has been acknowledged as responding.Onscene Time=When a unit has been acknowledge as being on
----%mae.-For any other 1 tistic outside Enroute to Onsceneto a Contac the IT Help Desk at 951-940-6900
<5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average %0 to 5 min
477 160 13 3 4.3 73.0%
The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM,HZMMC,OAC,OAF,OAM,OAMAD,OAMAI,OAMTE,OAMVA,OAP,OAR,OAV,OUT,OOU,
LEB,LEO,LEI,BRNPMT,OES,PAA,PAD,PAF,PAO,PAP,HFS,HFSAM,HFSCA,HSBT,HSBTC,HSBTS,HSBTV,HSE,HSG
Last Updated 5/3/2017 3:1 Page 2 of 6
Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in.
Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction
False Haz Mat Medical Multi-Fa Other Other Public Res Rescue Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildlan
Alarm m Fire Misc Service Fire Alarm Collisio Fire d Fire
Station 12 Temecula 26 0 79 1 1 1 5 0 0 1 4 22 0 2
Temecula
Station Total 26 0 79 1 1 1 5 0 0 1 4 22 0 2
Station 73 Rancho Temecula 18 0 161 1 1 0 19 0 0 0 4 22 1 1
California
Station Total 18 0 151 1 1 0 19 0 0 0 4 22 1 1
Station 83 French Temecula 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 1 0 0 0
Valley
Station Total 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Station 84 Temecula 13 3 133 0 3 1 11 2 0 0 2 13 0 0
Parkview
Station Total 13 3 133 0 3 1 11 2 0 0 2 13 0 0
Station 92 Wolf Temecula 15 0 99 0 3 0 4 0 1 2 1 14 0 0
Lreek
Station Total 15 0 99 0 3 0 4 0 1 2 1 14 0 0
Last Updated 5/3/2017 3:1 Page 3 of 6
Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in.
Incidents by Jurisdiction
FFalse Haz Mat Medical Multi-Fa Other Other Public Res Fire Rescue Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildland
Alarm m Fire Misc Service Alarm Collision Fire Fire
emecula 73 3 486 2 8 2 39 2 1 3 12 71 1 3 i
i.
Last Updated 5/3/2017 3:1 Page 4 of 6
*Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in.
Incidents by Supervisorial District- Summary
DISTRICT 3
CHUCK
WA
False Alarm 73
Haz Mat 3
Medical 486
Multi-Faro Dwelling Fire 2
Other Fire 8
Other Misc 2
Public Service Assist 39
Res Fire 2
Rescue 1
Ringing Alarm 3
Standby 12
Traffic Collision 71
Vehicle Fire 1
Wildland Fire 3
Last Updated 5/3/2017 3:1 Page 5 of 6
*Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in.
MONTH = 4 and YEAR 2017 and CI i NAME 'Ternecula'
0
V� V *a 14T V -
w+ +x
t7 to �
tet- � ` 41-- ,. •
4atiyn T3 .. 00
V i •'•� t o 4i
0 lop
V L4
Y' U A j J J iJ Li�My u 0
Fellil"t Ufa .2 O J. � a► �� '� Q
..,. E,
1%
00
4
� •' 'b
J �
l .�
V3.:1ii
� r � ✓V! � +3F+us� � � �,,,R
Si akis.no /
PECHAHGACASINO AND RV
1ae[ilanyj
- { T Al W° - r} d18Rfl8i -�,r� ,+/ i�'.0 f /• .
0
Legend
4 Fire ii Dther Mir c
Rivers ide County Fie Station
�i Flaz Mat 0 Public Service.,ssists
ReservationsCasinos Riverside County Fire GIS
Medical Hazard
Last Updated 5/3/2017 3:1 Page 6 of 6
*Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in.
2017 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals
PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS
2017 Class Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
CPR AED 19 6 11 24 60
FIRST AID 16 10 0 60 86
PEDIATRIC FIRST AID 0 0 0 0 0
HCP 0 0 0 0 0
STAFF HCP 0 0 0 0 0
CERT 1 0 0 0 1
TEEN CERT 0 0 0 28 28
Total 36 16 11 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175
INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
2017 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 1 1 2
FALSE ALARM 68 56 51 73 248
HAZ MAT 4 3 6 3 1 16
MEDICAL AID 529 513 566 486 2094
MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 2 0 2 4
OTHER FIRE 5 4 2 8 19
OTHER MISC. 4 3 2 2 11
PSA 42 35 1 44 39 160
RINGING ALARM 1 0 1 3 5
RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2 1 2 2 7
RESCUE 1 1 1 1 4
STANDBY 14 9 8 12 43
TRAFFIC COLLISSION 69 77 83 71 300
VEHICLE FIRE 1 1 3 1 6
WILDLAND FIRE 1 1 1 3 6
Total 741 7077771 706 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2925
FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON
2016 vs. 2017
800 7sa
700
I
600
500
I
400
I
300
200 17C +5
112 lip
�1 36 95
S�
100 16 16 1 X55 �5 l�
■2016YTD 02017YTO C�
MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD
JANUARY 30 36
FEBRUARY 16 16
MARCH 71 11
APRIL 55 112
MAY 65
UNE 49
JULY 176
AUGUST 114
SEPTEMBER 95
OCTOBER 52
[NOVEMBER 35
DECEMBER 0
TOTAL TO DATE 758 175
FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON
2016 vs. 2017
9000
8000 _
7000
6000
5000 _
4000 2016 YTD
3000
- - - - ❑2017 YTD
2000
10000 - ap. gpdip m -w- ® o o 0 ro
MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD
JANUARY 693 741
FEBRUARY 675 675
MARCH 621 771
APRIL 681 706
MAY 702
JUNE 702
JULY 708
AUGUST 699
SEPTEMBER 751
OCTOBER 744
[NOVEMBER 766
DECEMBER 829
TOTAL TO DATE 8571 2893
•11
Fire Department
Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education
Reporting Month: April Reporting Year: 2017
Reporting 12, 73, 84, 92
Stations:
PR and Public Education Programs:
Total Number of
Events Event Type Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts:
for Reporting Month
0 School Event 0 0
0 Adult Education 0 0
1 Fair/Safety Expo 2 N/A
0 Display 0 0
7 Station Tour 6 158
1 Fire Safety Trailer 3 75
1 Other 4 200
Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement)
Total Number of Initial Field Total Number of
Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for 0
Month Reporting Month
I
Prevention Referrals:
Total Number of
Re-inspections for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire
Month Prevention Referrals for 3
Reporting Month
Significant Events:
Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc.
Include photos if available.
Station 84 participated in the every 15 minutes event located at Temecula Valley High School.Station
12 was lead unit on the 2 alarm fire at the Sage Canyon apartments,Station 84 and several other
stations also responded to fire to contain it quickly.All the stations combined responded to over 600
emergency and non-emergency calls in the City of Temecula and the County as well assisted with city
of Murrieta.