HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot 8-12, 49-52, & 67 Geotechnical Investigationd
s
2
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
P E T R A
COSTA MESA • SAN DIEGO • TEMECULA • LOS ANGELES
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD.
4141 Jutland Avenue, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92117
Attention: Mr. Barry Galgut
Subject: Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading, Phase I, Lots 8 through 12,49
through 52 and 67, Tract 23064-2, Redhawk Development, County of
Riverside, California
Submitted herewith is a summary of observation and testing services provided by Petra
Geotechnical, Inc. (Petra) during recent grading operations within the Phase I of the
subject site. Conclusions relative to the suitability of the constructed building pads for
the proposed construction and foundation design recommendations for the proposed
residential structures are included herein.
All fills, cuts, overexcavation, removals and processing of existing ground under the
purview of this report have been completed under the observation and with selective
testing by Petra. The earthwork was performed in general accordance with our
geotechnical recommendations and substantial conformance with the grading
requirements of the County of Riverside.
Site grading commenced on December 27, 1996, with the Phase 1 lots completed on
July 3, 1997. The purpose of this portion of the grading operation was to rough -grade
level pads for construction of Phase I, consisting of t0 single-family residences.
Recommendations for grading of the site were presented in the referenced reports.
Limits of grading for this report are shown on accompanying Plate 1 of the grading
plans. The completed earthwork has been reviewed and is considered suitable for the
construction of structures. The following recommendations are based on our
observations and analysis. The geotechnical services were performed in general
PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
27620 Commerce Center Dr. Ste, 103
Temecula, CA 92590
t Tel: (909) 699-6193
Fax: (909) 699-6197
Petrate@ibm.net
ka
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
lJ
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 2
conformance with generally accepted professional engineering practices and no further
warranty is implied or stated.
Geology
Geologic conditions observed onsite in Phase I of the subject site are generally as
anticipated and described in the referenced preliminary geotechnical reports. The site
is underlain at depth by the Quaternary Pauba Formation. The Pauba Formation, as
observed onsite, is a massive to thick -bedded, coarse to fine silty sandstone. Bedding
orientation in the area of Phase I is generally flat -lying.
Geologic Units
Uncompacted_EHL(afl) -- Fill materials, associated with two existing minor
empondments located within TR 23064-1, were composed of locally derived
topsoil and/or Pauba Formation bedrock materials. The maximum thickness of the
artificial fill deposits has been estimated at between 10 to 20 feet. Minor
unmapped areas of spoil fill were associated with dirt roads that traversed the tract.
These soils were removed to competent bedrock, moisture -conditioned to near
optimum moisture content and compacted to greater than or equal to 90 percent
relative compaction.
• .C.ompacted_Fill (afc) -- Structural fills were mapped along the edges of golf -course
fairways and are adjacent to existing residential areas. This unit was encountered
generally along the margins of this subdivision. These soils were benched or
removed to competent fill, moisture -conditioned to near optimum moisture content
and compacted to greater than or equal to 90 percent relative compaction.
• Alluvium_(_Qal) -- Recent alluvial deposits are composed primarily of fine- to
t medium -grained silty and clayey sand and subordinate coarse-grained sand with
occasional gravel and cobble lenses. The alluvial deposits were found to vary from
dry to moist, loose to medium dense and porous and to be subject to varying
' degrees of hydro -consolidation. The thickness of alluvial materials was highly
variable and ranged from 3t feet in narrow tributary gully areas to greater than 50
feet in broad valleys. On the basis of laboratory consolidation tests, the thick
' deposits of alluvial materials underlying broad valley and canyon areas found to
be subject to significant of hydro -consolidation to a depth of up to approximately
25 feet. These materials were present in several canyons onsite. These soils were
1
it
3
I
' REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
' Page 3
' Removed to competent bedrock or non -collapsible alluvium, moisture -conditioned to
near optimum moisture content and compacted to greater than or equal to 90 percent
relative compaction.
' Slope-Wash_(Qsw) -- Minor slope -wash deposits composed of loose- to medium -
dense silty sand and clayey sand also coalesce with alluvial materials in major
' canyon and tributary areas. For purposes of mapping, these materials have been
combined with alluvial deposits.
' TopsoiL(no-symbol) -- Gravelly silty sand and clayey sand residual soil materials
have developed over Pauba Formation materials in thicknesses ranging from 1 to
3t feet. Thicker accumulations occur within gentle swale areas in thicknesses of
approximately 3 to 6 feet. Typically, residual soil materials were found to be dry
to damp and loose to medium dense. This unit was encountered across the tract.
These soils were removed to competent bedrock, moisture -conditioned to near
' optimum moisture content and compacted to greater than or equal to 90 percent
relative compaction.
' Pauba_Eormadon_(Qps) -- The entire site is underlain, at depth, by the late -
Pleistocene sedimentary Pauba Formation. The formation is composed of reddish -
brown to light brown, fine- to coarse-grained sandstones and silty sandstones with
' occasional gravel and silt beds. In-place materials, as encountered, varied from
damp to moist and dense to locally very dense.
' The bedding within the Pauba Formation is generally flat -lying. Within the
subject area, local areas of northeast -dipping beds were observed.
• Graundwater -- Shallow groundwater was not encountered in subsurface
investigation or during grading within this portion of the tract.
' Eaulting
' The active Wildomar fault zone is present along the western margin of the
Tract 23064-2. Fault trenching has not identified traces of the fault within the
' development area.
1
y
I
1
1
F
F
II
F
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 4
SiteOaring
Vegetation was stripped and removed from the site. Clearing operations also included
the removal of existing trash and debris. Roots observed after the initial clearing
operations were collected, stockpiled by hand labor and then removed from the site.
Loose stockpiles of soil were removed to the underlying original surface of the rough -
grade pad.
Ground Pry ation_-Fill_Areas
Prior to placing fill, existing low-density surface soils were removed to underlying
competent bedrock of the Pauba Formation. The exposed bottom surfaces were
scarified to a depth of 6 inches, watered as necessary to achieve near optimum
moisture conditions and then recompacted in-place to a minimum relative compaction
of 90 percent. Removal depths varied form 2 to 8 feet.
Cutnto-Fill Transitions
The cut -fill transition line indicated on the grading Plans (Plate 1) is the transition
resulting from this episode of grading. The portions of the area shown as cut are
actually certified fill placed previously as an earlier portion of the Redhawk
development. The cut -fill transition in some areas actually represents a new fill -old
fill transition line. The old fill surface was scarified, moisture ,conditioned and then
recompacted to create a uniform building -pad condition.
Fi1LSlapes
To achieve adequate compaction to the finish surfaces, all fill slopes were overfilled
and backrolled during construction at vertical intervals not exceeding approximately
4 to 5 feet and then trimmed back to the compacted inner cores.
I Ot
2
I
1
1
E
E
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 5
Fill Placement
Maximum depth of fill placed during this phase of grading is approximately 14 feet.
Fill materials consisting of blended onsite soils were placed in lifts of approximately
6 inches in thickness, watered as necessary to achieve near optimum moisture
conditions and then compacted with an 824 rubber -tired dozer and by wheel -rolling
with a loaded scraper.
Fill placed against temporary backcuts and on natural slope surfaces having a slope
gradient steeper than 5:1 (horizonal to vertical [h:v]) were keyed and benched into
competent bedrock or compacted fill materials.
Field -Testing
Field density tests were performed using nuclear gauge test methods (ASTM D2922
and D3017) and the sand cone method (ASTM D1556). Test results are shown on
Table 1 (attached) and approximate locations of the field density tests are shown on
Plate 1.
The compacted fills were tested at the time of placement to ascertain that the specified
moisture content and relative compaction had been achieved. Field density tests were
taken at vertical intervals of approximately 1 to 2 feet.
When field density tests indicated a relative compaction of less than 90 percent, the
approximate limits of the substandard fill were established, the area was reworked,
moisture -conditioned and recompacted as necessary under the observations of our
engineering technician, or the substandard materials were removed, moisture -
conditioned and replaced as properly compacted fill.
I It
4
1
1
1
1
t
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 6
Laboratory—Testing
• The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for each major
soil type encountered during grading was determined in accordance with Test
Method ASTM D1557-91. Table 2 below presents the pertinent test values.
Tablet
Sample'
;Optimum
1Vlax�mum Dry
No
Description ' ^
Moisture Content
Density
�fl
1
Brown, Silty CLAY
8.0
128.0
2
Brown, Silty SAND
9.0
129.0
3
Tan to light brown Silty
9.5
126.5
SAND
4
Reddish brown Silty SAND
8.5
131.0
5
Dark brown to black Silty
10.5
126.0
CLAY
6
Reddish brown to brown Silty
10.5
127.0
SAND
7
Brown Silty SAND
11.0
125.0
8
Tan, fine to coarse SAND
10.0
126.0
9
Light tan, grey, fine to
10.0
124.0
medium SAND
10
Tan, fine to Sandy Silty mix
10.0
127.0
11
Tan, fine to coarse SILT,
10.0
130.0
trace of Gravel
12
Reddish brown SAND to
8.0
129.0
light SAND
13
1 7.5
1 131.0
W
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 7
• Expansion index tests were performed on representative samples of soil existing
within the building areas in accordance with Uniform Building Code (UBC)
Standard Test No. 18-2. Table 3 below presents the results.
Table -3
r'sLocatron..
Ex ansion,Iudex..
?.Ex au'siou,PotentiA ,`•°i
Lot 8
9
Very Low
Lot 11
9
Very Low
Lots 22 - 26
4
Very Low
Lots 27 - 32
5
Very Low
Lots 33 - 37
7
Very Low
Lots 38 - 42
2
Very Low
Lots 43 - 48
7
Very Low
Lots 49 - 53
7
Very Low
Lots 54 - 60
8
Very Low
Lots 61 - 69
6
Very Low
Lot 68
7
Very Low
• Soluble sulfate contents were also determined for typical samples of soil existing
at -grade. Table 4 below presents the results.
Table—4
EM
I
1
F
I
1
1
1
h
1
1
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 8
LooaUon [" r ,
[ I
f-
Sulfate Content ;
Y R YY 4
[
Lot 58
0.0021
Lot 72
0.0051
Lot 75
0.0024
Lot 78
0.0048
Lots 22 - 26
0.0075
Lots 33 - 37
0.0120
Lots 43 - 48
0.0027
Lots 49 - 53
0.0024
Lots 54 - 60
0.0048
Lots 61 - 69
0.0066
Lots 27 - 32
0.0024
Lots 38 - 42
0.0015
Foundation -Design -Parameters
Allowable-SoiL-B"ring_Gapacities
For design of building and retaining wall footings, an allowable soil -bearing capacity
of 1,500 pounds per square foot may be used for a 12 -inch -wide, continuous footing
founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. This
value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional foot of width of depth to a
maximum value of 2,500 pounds per square foot. Recommended allowable soil -
bearing capacities include both dead and live loads and may be increased by one-third
for short -duration wind and seismic forces.
It
a
I
1
I
I
11
11
1
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 9
settlement
Under the above -recommended maximum soil -bearing capacity, total maximum
footing settlements are expected to be less than 0.75 inch and differential settlements
between adjacent footings are expected to be less than 0.25 inch over a span of
approximately 30 feet. The majority of the anticipated settlements are expected to take
place during construction as footing loads are applied.
LateraMesistance
A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth to a maximum
value of 2,500 pounds per square foot may be used to determine lateral bearing for
building and retaining wall footings located at least 7 feet from the top of any adjacent
descending slope. Where retaining wall footings are to be constructed on or within 7
feet from the top of a descending slope, a passive earth pressure of 150 pounds per
square foot per foot of depth to a maximum value of 1,500 pounds per square foot
should be used to determine the lateral bearing resistance. A coefficient of friction of
0.35 times the dead load forces may also be used between concrete and the supporting
soils to determine lateral sliding resistance for all building and retaining wall footings.
An increase of one-third of the above values may be used when designing for short -
duration wind and seismic forces.
Footing_ Observations
All footing trenches should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to
ascertain that they have been excavated into competent bearing soils. These
observations should be performed prior to placement of forms or reinforcement. The
excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. All loose, sloughed or
moisture -softened materials and any debris should be removed prior to placing
concrete.
!0
I
' Exterior isolated pad footings intended for support of roof overhangs, such as patio
covers, should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at a minimum depth
of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The pad footings should be
' reinforced with No. 4 bars spaced 18 inches on center, both ways, near the bottom
of the footings.
' Living -area concrete floor slabs should be 4 inches thick and reinforced with 6 -inch
by 6 -inch, No. 10 by No. 10 welded -wire mesh; or with No. 3 bars spaced 24
1
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 10
'
Excavated soils derived from footing and utility trenches should not be placed in slab -
dry
on -grade areas unless they are compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum
'
density.
Expansive_SniLand-RedroAl—Considerations
'
The results of our laboratory tests indicate that the onsite soils and bedrock materials
exhibit a -very loN--expansion_potential as classified in accordance with UBC
Table 18-I-13. For this condition, it is recommended that footings and floors be
'
constructed and reinforced in accordance with the following minimum criteria.
However, additional slab thickness, footing sizes and reinforcement should be
provided as required by the project architect or structural engineer.
• Standard depth footings may be used with respect to building code requirements
for the planned construction (i.e., 12 inches deep for one-story construction and 18
inches deep for two-story construction). Interior continuous footings for two-story
construction may be founded at a minimum depth of 2 inches below the lowest
'
adjacent final grade.
• All continuous footings should be reinforced with two No. 4 bars, one top and one
'
bottom.
• Interior isolated pad footings supporting raised floors should be a minimum of 24
inches square and founded at minimum depths of 12 and 18 inches below the
lowest adjacent final grade for one- and two-story construction, respectively. The
'
pad footings should be reinforced with No. 4 bars spaced 18 inches on center, both
ways, near the bottom of the footings.
' Exterior isolated pad footings intended for support of roof overhangs, such as patio
covers, should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at a minimum depth
of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The pad footings should be
' reinforced with No. 4 bars spaced 18 inches on center, both ways, near the bottom
of the footings.
' Living -area concrete floor slabs should be 4 inches thick and reinforced with 6 -inch
by 6 -inch, No. 10 by No. 10 welded -wire mesh; or with No. 3 bars spaced 24
1
I
I
I
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 11
inches on center, both ways. All slab reinforcement should be supported on
concrete chairs or brick to ensure the desired placement near mid -depth.
• Living -area concrete floors should be underlain with a moisture vapor barrier
consisting of a polyvinyl chloride membrane, such as 6 -mil visqueen or equivalent.
At least 2 inches of clean sand should be placed over the membrane to promote
uniform curing of the concrete.
• Garage floor slabs should be 4 inches thick and reinforced in a similar manner as
living -area floor slabs. Garage floor slabs should also be poured separately from
adjacent wall footings with a positive separation maintained with 0.38 -inch -
minimum felt expansion joint materials and quartered with weakened plane joints.
A 12 -inch -wide grade beam founded at the same depth as adjacent footings should
be provided across garage entrances. The grade beam should be reinforced with
two No. 4 bars, one top and one bottom.
• Presaturation of the subgrade below slab areas will not be required. However, prior
to placing concrete, the subgrade should be thoroughly moistened to promote
uniform curing of the concrete and mitigate the development of shrinkage cracks.
RETAINING 'ALL-DESLGN-REG_OMMENDATLONS
Min imum-Footing_Embsdment
To mitigate the potential adverse effects of creep that will develop on the cut -and -fill
slopes with a passage of time, footings for retaining walls proposed at the tops of
descending slopes should be founded at a depth that will provide a minimum
horizontal setback of 7 feet between the outside bottom edges of the footings and the
slope face. This minimum embedment is expected to place the footings below any
further creep -affected slope soils, as well as provide adequate vertical and lateral
support without subjecting the footings to detrimental settlement. Where retaining
walls are proposed at distances of 7 feet and greater from the tops of descending
slopes, the footings may be pounded at minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest
adjacent final grade; however, a minimum embedment of 18 inches may be preferable
to provide at least 6 inches of cover over the footings.
1A
11
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 12
ActiveandAtBest-Earth_ hessuus
An active lateral earth pressure equivalent fluid having a density of 45 pounds per
cubic foot is tentatively recommended for design of cantilevered walls retaining a
drained, level backfill. Where the wall backfill slopes upward at 2:1 (h:v), the above
value should be increased to 75 pounds per cubic foot. All retaining walls should be
designed to resist any surcharge loads imposed by other nearby walls or structures in
addition to the above active earth pressures.
For design of retaining walls that are restrained at the top, an at -rest earth pressure
equivalent to a fluid having density of 68 pounds per cubic foot should tentatively be
used for walls supporting an ascending 2:1 (h:v) backfill.
Drainage
Perforated pipe and gravel subdrains should be installed behind all retaining walls to
prevent entrapment of water in the backfill. Perforated pipe should consist of 4 -inch -
minimum -diameter PVC Schedule 40 or ABS SDR -35, with the perforations laid
down. The pipe should be encased in a 1 -foot -wide column of 0.75 inch to 1.5 -inch
open -graded gravel extending above the wall footing to a height equal to two-thirds
of the wall height, or to a minimum height of 1.5 feet above the footing, whichever is
greater. The gravel should be completely wrapped in filter fabric consisting of Mirafi
140N, or equivalent. Solid outlet pipes should be connected to the subdrains and
routed to areas suitable for discharge of accumulated water.
For low -height walls retaining less than approximately 2.5 feet of backfill, an
alternative drainage system consisting of weepholes or open masonry joints may be
used in -lieu of a pipe and gravel subdrain. Weepholes, if used, should be 3 inches
minimum diameter and provided at maximum intervals of 6 feet along the walls. Open
vertical masonry joints should be provided at 32 -inch -minimum intervals. One cubic
I
1
11
D
1
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 13
foot of gravel should be placed behind the weepholes or open masonry joints. The
gravel should be wrapped in filter fabric to prevent infiltration of fines and subsequent
clogging of the gravel. Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, or equivalent.
Waterproofmg
Consideration should be given to coating the outside portions of retaining walls
supporting backfill with an approved waterproofing compound or covered with a
similar material to inhibit infiltration of moisture through the walls.
RetainingMallBackfill
All retaining wall backfill should be placed in 6- to 8 -inch -thick maximum horizontal
lifts, watered or air-dried as necessary to achiever near optimum moisture conditions
and then mechanically compacted in-place to a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent. Flooding or jetting of backfill materials should be avoided. 'A Petra
representative should probe and test the backfills to ascertain adequate compaction.
EXTERIQR-CONERETE_ELAT-W_ORK
Thicknessand Expansion_Joint Spacing
To reduce the potential for excessive and unsightly cracking related to the effects of
expansive soils, walkways and patio -type slabs should be at least 4 inches thick and
provided with weakened or expansion joints every 6 feet or less. Subslabs to be
covered with decorative pavers should also be at least 4 inches thick and provided with
weakened plane joints or expansion joints every 6 feet or less. Concrete driveway
slabs should also be at least 5 inches thick and provided with weakened plane joints
or expansion joints every 10 feet or less.
/y
I
1
1
I
I
1
[1
n
1
C
I
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 14
Reinforcement
Consideration should be given to reinforcing all concrete patio -type slabs, driveways
and sidewalks grater than 5 feet in width with 6 -inch by 6 -inch No. 10 by No. 10
welded -wire fabric or with No. 3 bars spaced 24 inches on centers, both ways. The
reinforcement should be positioned near the middle of the slabs by means of concrete
chairs or brick.
E dge_B ea ms_(Optional)
Where the outer edges of concrete patios and driveways are to be bordered by
landscaping, consideration should be given to the use of edge beams (thickened edges)
to prevent excessive infiltration and accumulation of water under the slabs. Edge
beams, if used, should be 6 to 8 inches wide, extend 8 inches below the tops of the
finish slab surfaces and be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one top and
one bottom. Edge beams are not mandatory; however, their inclusion in flatwork
construction adjacent to landscaped areas will significantly reduce the potential for
vertical and horizontal movements and subsequent cracking of the flatwork related to
the effects of high uplift forces that can develop in expansive soils.
SubgradQ-Preparation
As a further measure to minimize cracking and/or shifting of concrete flatwork, the
subgrade soils below concrete flatwork areas should be compacted to a minimum
relative compaction of 90 percent and then thoroughly moistened prior to placing
concrete. The moisture content of the soils should be 5 percent or greater above the
optimum moisture content and penetrate to a depth of approximately 12 inches into the
subgrade. Flooding or ponding of the subgrade is not considered feasible to achieve
the above moisture conditions since this method would likely require construction of
numerous earth berms to contain the water. Therefore, moisture conditioning should
be achieved with sprinklers or light spray applied to the subgrade over a period of
/s
I
I
1
11
I
L
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2
July 30, 1997
J.N. 569-96
Page 15
several days just prior to pouring concrete. A Petra representative should observe and
verify the density and moisture content of the soils and the depth of moisture
penetration prior to pouring concrete.
MASONRY_BLOCK�GARDEN—W-ALLS_ANIZS-OUND-'ALL
E2otinaEmbedment
Footings for masonry block walls should be constructed in a similar manner as
recommended for retaining wall footings. That is, to mitigate the potential adverse
effects of creep that will develop on the cut -and -fill slopes with the passage of time,
footings for the sound attenuation walls, as well as other masonry block walls
proposed near the tops of descending slopes, should be founded at a depth that will
provide a minimum horizontal setback of 7 feet between the outside bottom edges of
the footings and the slope face. Where masonry block walls are proposed at distances
of 7 feet and greater from the tops of descending slopes, the footings may be founded
at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade; however, a
minimum embedment of 18 inches may be preferable to provide at least 6 inches of
cover over the footings.
Reinfo reemeat_and-Positive-Sep mations
All masonry block wall footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4
bars, one top and one bottom. In order to mitigate the potential for unsightly cracking,
positive separations should also be provided in the garden walls at horizontal spacings
of approximately 20 to 25 feet, and at each comer. These separations should be
provided in the blocks only and not extend through the footing. The footing should
be poured monolithically with continuous rebars to serve as an effective "grade beam"
below the wall.
�G-
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 16
Area drains should be extended into all planter areas that are located within 5 feet of
building walls and foundations, retaining walls and garden walls to minimize excessive
infiltration of water into the adjacent foundation soils. The surface of the ground in
these areas should be sloped at a minimum gradient of 2 percent away from the walls
and foundations. Drip irrigation systems are also recommended to prevent
overwatering and subsequent saturation of the adjacent foundation soils.
Low -height planter walls should be supported by continuous concrete footings founded
at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade; however, a
minimum embedment of 18 inches may be preferable to allow for 6 inches of cover
over the footings. The footings should be reinforced with two No. 4 bars, one top and
one bottom. Positive separations should also be provided in the planter walls in a
similar manner as recommended for masonry block walls.
SOL..UBLE_SULEATE_ANALYSES
Laboratory test data indicate that onsite soils contain water-soluble sulfate contents
less than 0.1 percent. Therefore, negligible to low exposure to sulfate can be expected
for concrete placed in contact with onsite soil. As such, no special mitigation
measures are necessitated or required. Careful control of maximum water -
cementations ratio and minimum concrete compressive strength can also improve
resistance to deterioration due to sulfates. We also recommend that the procedures
provided in Section 1904.3.1 and Table 19-A-3 of the 1994 UBC be followed.
�7
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
P
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 17
UTILITY TRENCHBACKEILL
All utility trench backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of
90 percent. Where onsite soils are utilized as backfill, mechanical compaction will be
required. Therefore, trench backfill materials should be placed in approximately 12 -
to 18 -inch -maximum lifts, watered or air-dried as necessary to achieve near optimum
moisture conditions and then mechanically compacted in-place with a hydra -hammer,
pneumatic tamper or similar equipment to a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent. A Petra representative should be notified at the appropriate times to ascertain
the relative compaction of the backfill.
For shallow trenches where pipe or utilities might be damaged by mechanical
compaction equipment, imported sand having a sand equivalent value of 30 or greater
may be used for backfill. Sand backfill materials should be watered to achieve near
optimum moisture conditions and then tamped with hand -operated pneumatic tampers
to ensure proper consolidation of the backfill. No specific relative compaction will be
required. However, observation, probing and, if deemed necessary, testing should be
performed to ascertain that the backfill is adequately compacted.
Where exterior and interior utility trenches are proposed parallel to building footings,
the bottom of the trench should not extend below a 1:1 (h:v) plane projected downward
from the bottom edge of the adjacent footing. Where this condition occurs, the
adjacent footing should be deepened or backfilled with sand -cement slurry.
SLOPE-LANDS-CAI'ING AND MMNT_ENANCE
All cut -and -fill slopes should be provided with the proposed drainage facilities and
landscaping as soon as practical upon completion of rough grading to minimize the
potential for erosion, raveling or slumping. Additional recommendations with respect
to
/I
I
1 REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 18
' to slope landscaping and maintenance are presented below to mitigate surficial
instability.
' The landscaping for all cut -and -fill slopes should consist of a deep-rooted, drought -
resistant and maintenance -free plant species. A landscape architect should be
' consulted to determine the most suitable ground cover for both cut and fill slopes.
If landscaping cannot be provided within a reasonable period of time, jute matting
' or equivalent, or a spray -on product designed to seal slope surfaces should be
considered as a temporary measure to inhibit surface erosion.
' A permanent slope maintenance program should be initiated. Proper slope
maintenance must include the care of drainage and erosion control provisions,
' rodent control and timely repair of leaking irrigation systems.
• Provided the above recommendations are followed with respect to slope drainage,
' maintenance and landscaping, the cut -and -fill slopes are expected to be surficially
stable and to remain so under normal conditions.
F_UTURE_IMPROVE MENTS
' Should any new structures or improvements be proposed at any time in the future,
other than those shown on the enclosed grading plan, Petra should be notified so that
' we may provide design recommendations to mitigate movement and/or tilting of the
structures related to the effects of expansive earth materials.
1 •
/9
• Irrigation systems should be installed on slopes exceeding a height of 10 feet and
'
a watering program then implemented which maintains a uniform near optimum
moisture condition in the soils. Overwatering and subsequent saturation of the
'
slope soils should be avoided. On the other hand, allowing the soils to dry out is
also detrimental to slope
performance.
'
• Irrigation systems should be constructed at the surface only. Construction of
sprinkler lines in trenches should not be allowed without prior approval from this
firm.
'
• During construction of the proposed drainage facilities, care must be taken to avoid
placement of loose soil on the slope surfaces.
' A permanent slope maintenance program should be initiated. Proper slope
maintenance must include the care of drainage and erosion control provisions,
' rodent control and timely repair of leaking irrigation systems.
• Provided the above recommendations are followed with respect to slope drainage,
' maintenance and landscaping, the cut -and -fill slopes are expected to be surficially
stable and to remain so under normal conditions.
F_UTURE_IMPROVE MENTS
' Should any new structures or improvements be proposed at any time in the future,
other than those shown on the enclosed grading plan, Petra should be notified so that
' we may provide design recommendations to mitigate movement and/or tilting of the
structures related to the effects of expansive earth materials.
1 •
/9
I
1
I
1
I
[1
I
0
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 19
This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other
professionals providing similar services at the same locale and in the same time period.
The contents of this report are professional opinions and as such are not to be
considered a guaranty or warranty.
This report has not been prepared for use by parties or projects other those named or
described herein. This report may not contain sufficient information for other parties
or other purposes.
POST-GRADJXG—OBSERVATION-AND_TESTING
Petra should be notified at the appropriate times in order that we may provide the
following observation and testing services during the various phases of post -grading
construction.
• Building -Construction
- Observe footing trenches when first excavated to ascertain depth and competent
soil -bearing conditions.
- Re -observe all footing trenches, if necessary, if trenches are found to be
excavated to inadequate depth and/or are found to contain significant slough,
saturated or compressible soils.
• Retaining-WallConstruction
- Observe all footing trenches when first excavated to ascertain depth and
competent soil -bearing conditions.
- Re -observe all footing trenches, if necessary, if trenches are found to be
excavated to inadequate depth and/or are found to contain significant slough,
saturated or compressible soils.
- Observe and ascertain proper installation of subdrainage systems prior to
placing wall backfill.
'�D
I
' REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
' Page 20
' Observe and test placement of all wall backfill.
• Masonry_Garden�alls_and Planter -Walls
' - Observe all footing trenches when first excavated to ascertain depth and
competent soil -bearing conditions.
- Re -observe all footing trenches, if necessary, if trenches are found to be
excavated to inadequate depth and/or are found to contain significant slough,
saturated or compressible soils.
• Concrete-latwork_C.onstrmction -- Observe and test subgrade soils below all
concrete flatwork areas to ascertain relative compaction, moisture content and
moisture penetration.
L1
d
I
I
• Utility. -Trench -Backfill -- Observe and test placement of all utility trench backfill.
• Regrading -- Observe and test placement of any fill to be placed above or beyond
the grades shown on the grading plan. I
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding
this report, please contact this office.
Respectfully submitted,
PETRA GEO ECHNICA
�*G1 E#',pC
*Princal
n n H E C. 1074 a M)
o *st
CEG 1074_
UPA
�'4 n_ 0'\%tiF���
Attachments: Table 1 - Fie � ns7 st Results
Plate 1 - Geotechnical Map (in pocket)
Distribution: (3) Addressee
(3) County of Riverside
Attention: Mr. Abduhl Benhawa
't'aW
Siamak Jafroudi, PhD
Principal Engineer
RCE 36641
No. 36641
Expo UV
CAL
oi/
I
1
d
CJ
LJ
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING July 30, 1997
Redhawk Development/TR 23064-2 J.N. 569-96
Page 21
REFERENCES
Petra Geotechnical, Inc., 1989, Supplemental Soils Engineering and Engineering
Geologic Investigation, Portion of Redhawk Project, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map Nos. 23064, 23065, 23066 and 23067, Rancho California, County of
Riverside, California, Job Number 288-89, dated May 8, 1989.
1997, Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading, Model Site, Lots 30 through
34, Tract 23064-1, Redhawk Development, County of Riverside, California,
Job Number 569-96, dated March 12, 1997.
coa�
' 1/29/97 7 N 1168 10.7 116.8 2 91
1/29/97 8 N 1169 11.4 121.4 4 93
' 1/29/97 9 N 1170 10.8 122.8 4 94
1/29/97 10 N 1184 12.1 115.3 1 90
1/29/97 11 N 1185 12.4 116.9 1 91
1/29/97 12 N 1186 12 118 1 91
1/30/97 13 N 1157 14.1 114.6 5 91
1/30/97 14 N 1158 12.2 1187 1 93
1
15
239 N
1176
11.9
J.N. 569-96
5
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE
16
N
1177
12.4
117.8
1
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
5
DATE
NO.
TYPE
18
N
DEN.
NO. COMP.
'
8
92
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
1148
(%)
116.8
2
91
2/1/97
20
N
1149
12.8
1/28/97
1
N
1182
11.1
115.5
1
90
'
1/28/97
2
N
1183
13.7
113.8
5
90
14.6
1/28/97
3
N
1189
13
114.8
.1
91
'
1/28/97
4
N
1190
14
114.9
1
90
13.1
1/29/97
5
N
1151
12.8
118.6
2
92
12.6
1/29/97
6
N
1152
12.2
118.5
2
92
' 1/29/97 7 N 1168 10.7 116.8 2 91
1/29/97 8 N 1169 11.4 121.4 4 93
' 1/29/97 9 N 1170 10.8 122.8 4 94
1/29/97 10 N 1184 12.1 115.3 1 90
1/29/97 11 N 1185 12.4 116.9 1 91
1/29/97 12 N 1186 12 118 1 91
1/30/97 13 N 1157 14.1 114.6 5 91
1/30/97 14 N 1158 12.2 1187 1 93
P
I
o:u
1/30/97
15
239 N
1176
11.9
112.4
5
89
1/30/97
16
N
1177
12.4
117.8
1
92
1/30/97
17
240 N
1193
12
112.9
5
89
1/30/97
18
N
1194
11.8
115.8
8
92
'
2/1/97
19
N
1148
11.9
116.8
2
91
2/1/97
20
N
1149
12.8
119.9
4
92
2/1/97
21
N
1175
10.8
111.2
9
90
2/1/97
22
N
1176
14.6
116.3
1
91
'
2/1/97
23
N
1178
14.5
112.5
7
90
2/1/97
24
N
1193
13.1
112.2
7
90
'
2/1/97
25
N
1194
12.6
118.3
1
92
P
I
o:u
LJ'
' 2/4/97 34 N 1164 12.6 117.9 2 91
2/4/97 35 N 1165 13.6 114.9 1 90
' 2/4/97 36 N 1154 15.5 113.6 5 90
2/4/97 37 N 1155 12.7 120.5 4 92
' 2/4/97 38 N 1167 11.7 112 9 90
2/4/97 39 N '1168 11.1 113.6 5 90
'
LTD ABLE 1
40
N
1208
J.N. 569-96
114.1
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP
2/4/97
41
N
1209
11.1
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
116.9
DATE
NO.
TYPE
2/4/97
43
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
119.2
4
91
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
1202
(%)
116.9
2
91
2/5/97
45
N
1203
12.8
2/3/97
26
N
1148
14.6
117.6
2
91
'
2/3/97
27
N
1149
12.6
115.5
1
90
13.6
2/3/97
28
N
1160
15.1
114.9
1
90
'
2/3/97
29
N
1161
15
115.9
1
91
12.6
2/3/97
30 31
N
1154
11.3
110.3
1
86
'
100.6
2
86
1154
12.3
115.1
1
90
2/3/97
31
N
'
2/3/97
32
N
1163
12.7
113.7
5
90
2/3/97
33
N
1164
13.7
114.7
1
90
' 2/4/97 34 N 1164 12.6 117.9 2 91
2/4/97 35 N 1165 13.6 114.9 1 90
' 2/4/97 36 N 1154 15.5 113.6 5 90
2/4/97 37 N 1155 12.7 120.5 4 92
' 2/4/97 38 N 1167 11.7 112 9 90
2/4/97 39 N '1168 11.1 113.6 5 90
'
2/4/97
40
N
1208
12.4
114.1
6
90
2/4/97
41
N
1209
11.1
114.8
1
90
2/4/97
42
N
1199
11.2
116.9
1
91
2/4/97
43
N
1201
11.4
119.2
4
91
'
2/5/97
44
N
1202
12.3
116.9
2
91
2/5/97
45
N
1203
12.8
121.9
4
93
2/5/97
46
N
1220
14.1
120
4
92
2/5/97
47
N
1165
13.6
113.9
5
90
'
2/5/97
48
N
1166
12.9
117.1
1
91
2/5/97
49
51 N
1180
12.6
99.8
2
85
'
2/5/97
50
52 N
1181
13.7
100.6
2
86
I
[1
1
' 7��p;2 '?O4:�o 5:oe-�
as
1
J.N. 569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO. COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
2/5/97
51
N
1180
10.3
118.1
2
92
'
2/5/97
52
N
1181
10.7
116.8
2
91
2/6/97
53
N
1163
13.2
115.3
1
90
'
2/6/97
54
N
1164
12.1
119.3
4
91
2/7/97
55
N
1166
12.8
120.2
4
92
I
1167
13.3
117.2
1
92
2/7/97
56
N
2/7/97
57
N
1168
11.8
119.1
4
91
2/7/97
58
N
1160
11.8
119.6
4
91
2/7/97
59
N
1161
13
119.8
4
91
'
2/7/97
60
N
1162
13.2
116.8
1
91
2/7/97
61
N
1164
9.5
117.9
4
90
2/7/97
62
N
1165
14.2
116.3
2
90
'
2/10/97
63
N
1169
13.3
116.7
1
91
2/10/97
64
N
1170
11.4
115.6
1
90
'
2/10/97
65
N
1168
11.4
116.5
1
91
2/10/97
66
N
1164
15.3
114.7
1
90
2/10/97
67
N
1165
11.7
118.8
2
92
2/10/97
68
N
1158
11
116.9
1
91
2/10/97
69
N
1159
13.6
114.8
1
90
2/10/97
70
N
1207
13.5
119.7
4
91
2/10/97
71
N
1222
14.2
114.9
1
90
2/10/97
72
N
1223
10.6
114.6
1
90
'
2/10/97
73
N
1184
10.6
116.5
2
90
2/10/97
74
N
1185
10.1
115.6
2
90
2/10/97
75
N
1208
13.9
19.6
2
93
3
' 7��p;2 '?O4:�o 5:oe-�
as
tREDHAWK
J.N.
569-96
HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
2/10/97
76 77
N
1219
12.5
112
1
88
'
2/10/97
77
N
1219
14
114.9
1
90
2/11/97
78
N
1213
10.6
123.2
92
'
2/11/97
79
N
1214
10.9
114.8
6
90
2/11/97
80
N
1182
13.9
113
7
90
1183
11.8
112.5
7
90
2/11/97
81
N
2/11/97
82
N
1158
13.6
116
1
91
2/11/97
83
N
1159
16.3
111.5
9
90
2/11/97
84
N
1160
11.9
117.5
2
91
'
2/11/97
85
N
1170
12.2
116.1
2
90
'
2/11/97
86
N
1171
13.3
117.5
2
91
2/11/97
87
N
1156
13.9
114.3
6
90
'
2/11/97
88
N
1157
12.7
116.1
2
90
2/12/97
89
N
1176
14.4
115.6
1
90
2/12/97
90
N
1177
14
117.8
4
90
2/12/97
91
N
1171
11.6
117.6
2
91
2/12/97
92
N
1172
12
118.1
2
92
2/12/97
93
N
1161
9.6
116.6
2
90
'
2/12/97
94
N
1163
14.7
117
2
91
2/12/97
95
N
1176
10.8
114.2
5
91
2/12/97
96
N
1177
12.8
111.3
9
90
2/12/97
97
N
1168
10.6
116
1
91
2/12/97
98
N
1169
11.8
117
2
91
2/14/97
109
N
1164
9.8
122.3
91
'
2/14/97
110
N
1165
10.4
116.2
2
90
4
a6
'
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%).
2/14/97
111
N
1166
10.4
117.1
2
91
2/14/97
112
N
1176
11.7
116.3
2
90
2/14/97
113
N
1177
10.2
117.7
4
90
2/14/97
114
123
N
1180
6.3
109.4
9
88
2/14/97
115
124
N
1181
5.6
110.6
9
89
12.6
111.1
9
90
2/14/97
116
N
1176
2/14/97
117
125
N
1177
10.3
108.6
9
88
2/14/97
118
126
N
1178
14.8
109.1
9
88
'
2/14/97
119
127
N
1168
12.7
109.8
9
88
2/14/97
120
N
1169
14
106.8
91
'
2/14/97
121
129
N
1165
12.6
107.4
9
87
2/14/97
122
130
N
1166
10.2
104.4
9
89
'
2/14/97
123
N
1180
10.4
115.1
1
90
2/14/97
124
N
1181
11.3
112.8
7
90
'
2/14/97
125
N
1177
12.3
118
1
92
2/14/97
126
N
1178
15.8
111.3
9
90
2/14/97
126
N
1168
12.1
120.3
4
92
2/14/97
128
N
1169
11.5
118.8
4
91
y
2/14/97
129
N
1165
11.1
115.9
1
91
2/14/97
130
N
1166
9.3
115
1
90
2/19/97
138
N
1198
14.9
116.9
11
90
2/19/97
139
N
1200
14.1
114.2
90
'
2/19/97
140
N
1173
14.2
117.1
11
90
2/19/97
141
N
1175
15.4
115.5
8
92
'
2/19/97
142
N
1183
14.6
115.9
8
92
N
1
41
U
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
' TEST TEST RETEST TEST NORTHING EASTING ELEV MOIST. DRY
DATE NO. TYPE DEN.
J.N. 569-96
MAX REL.
NO. COMP.
'
' 2/20/97 151 N 1179 11.6 115.1 8 91
2/20/97 152 N 1184 14 113.4 9 91
' 2/20/97 153 N 1183 13.3 115.5 8 92
2/20/97 154 N 1182 14.5 113.7 9 92
2/20/97 155 N 1183 13.6 116.4 8 92
2/20/97 156 N 1210 13.1 114.8 8 91
2/20/97
157
N
(FT)
(%)
(PCP)
2
(%)
2/20/97
158
N
1177
12.6
117.4
11
90
2/19/97
143
N
1202
13.2
113.3
9
91
92
2/19/97
144
N
1204
14
113.3
9
91
90
2/19/97
145
N
1206
14.3
116.5
12
90
'
2/19/97
146
N
1208
13.8
116.4
8
92
87
2/19/97
147
N
1190
12.3
112.7
9
91
91
2/20/97
164
1187
13.1
112.6
9
91
90
2/19/97
148
N
N
1188
14.7
114.1
8
91
2/19/97
149
N
1185
13
116.2
2
90
92
2/20/97
167
N
1200
13.9
117.2
11
90
2/20/97
150
N
1178
13.1
116.5
8
92
' 2/20/97 151 N 1179 11.6 115.1 8 91
2/20/97 152 N 1184 14 113.4 9 91
' 2/20/97 153 N 1183 13.3 115.5 8 92
2/20/97 154 N 1182 14.5 113.7 9 92
2/20/97 155 N 1183 13.6 116.4 8 92
2/20/97 156 N 1210 13.1 114.8 8 91
1�
L
6
4�8
2/20/97
157
N
1212
11.4
116.3
2
90
2/20/97
158
N
1177
12.6
117.4
11
90
'
2/20/97
159
N
1178
13.1
115.6
8
92
2/20/97
160,
N
1214
14.8
116.7
2
90
2/20/97
161
N
1216
13.5
115
8
91
2/20/97
162
163 N
1187
14
109.9
8
87
'
2/20/97
163
N
1187
13.6
115
8
91
2/20/97
164
N
1187
14.3
116.9
11
90
'
2/20/97
165
N
1188
14.7
114.1
8
91
2/20/97
166
N
1199
13.9
116.2
8
92
2/20/97
167
N
1200
13.9
117.2
11
90
1�
L
6
4�8
IREDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1 J.N. 569-96
!91
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING
EASTING ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
2/20/97
168
N
1181
14.6
116.2
2
90
'
2/20/97
169
N
1182
14.3
114.3
8
91
2/20/97
170
N
1190
14.9
116.9
11
90
'
2/20/97
171
N
1191
13.6
114.6
8
91
2/20/97
172
N
1185
14.1
116.7
2
90
1181
13.1
116.9
11
90
2/21/97
173
N
2/21/97
174
N
1183
14.3
113.9
8
90
'
1185
14.6
116.3
8
92
2/21/97
175
N
2/21/97
176
N
1186
13
114.8
8
91
2/21/97
177
N
1224
14.3
115.9
10
91
'
2/21/97
178
N
1223
15.4
111.3
9
90
2/21/97
179
N
1216
14
112.9
9
91
'
2/21/97
180
N
1217
15.5
116
8
92
2/21/97
181
N
1219
15.1
114.2
8
91
2/21/97
182
N
1220
12.6
113.9
9
92
2/21/97
183
N
1214
14.4
115.2
8
91
2/21/97
184
N
1215
13.6
113.2
9
91
2/21/97
185
N
1193
14.1
117.2
11
90.
2/21/97
186
N
1194
13.3
119.8
11
92
2/21/97
187
N
1185
13.9
116.3
10
92
'
2/21/97
188
N
1186
15.3
111.7
9
90
2/21/97
189
N
1185
13.3
119.2
11
92
'
2/21/97
190
N
1186
12.8
117.3
11
90
2/21/97
191
N
1222
13.1
118.7
11
91
'
2/21/97
192
N
1223
12.6
116.2
8
92
7
!91
L'
30
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
J.N. 569-96
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
'
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
2/21/97
193
N
1219
13.9
118.6
11
91
'
2/21/97
194
N
1220
14.3
113.5
8
90
2/24/97
195
N
1184
13.1
123.3
11
95
'
2/24/97
196
N
1185
it
118.6
I1
91
2/24/97
197
N
1186
10.5
120.8
I1
93
2/24/97
198
N
1187
12.4
122.5
4
93
2/24/97
199
N
1187
12.6
116.3
2
90
'
1188
13.9
117.8
I1
91
2/24/97
200
N
2/24/97
201
N
1196
10.9
116.1
8
92
'
118.9
11
91
2/24/97
202
N
1197
11.8
2/24/97
203
N
1225
12.5
119.6
11
92
'
2/24/97
204
N
1226
12.8
120.5
4
92
2/25/97
205
N
1219
13.1
117.2
11
90
2/25/97
206
N
1220
13.9
114.7
8
91
'
2/25/97
207
N
1194
13.9
120.5
11
93
2/25/97
208
N
1195
12.6
120.2
11
92
'
2/25/97
209
N
1192
13.3
115.8
8
92
2/25/97
210
N
1193
14.6
113.2
8
90
'
2/25/97
211
N
1216
12.9
117.1
8
93
2/25/97
212
N
1218
10.5
116
8
92
'
2/25/97
213
N
1220
12.8
116.6
11
90
2/25/97
214
N
1194
13.5
118.2
11
91
'
2/25/97
215
- N
1195
12.4
117.7
11
91
2/25/97
216
N
1222
13.9
118.5
11
91
'
2/25/97
217
N
1224
14.6
116.1
10
91
8
30
.3/
LTD ABLE 1
J.N. 569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FI)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
2/25/97
218
N
1226
15
112.7
9
90
'
2/26/97
219
N
1186
11.8
115.6
8
92
2/26/97
220
N
1187
12.9
117.1
8
93
2/26/97
221
N
1188
15
118.9
11
91
2/26/97
222
N
1189
13.4
118.3
11
91
1188
12.1
116.1
8
92
2/26/97
223
N
'
2/26/97
224
N
1189
13.1
117.6
2
91
91
2/26/97
225
N
1188
16.1
114.1
8
2/26/97
226
N
1189
15.1
115.8
8
92
2/26/97
227
N
1197
14.1
113.8
8
90
2/26/97
228
N
1198
17.3
115.2
6
91
2/28/97
229
N
1189
12.1
116.1
8
2
2/28/97
230
N
1190
12.9
118.6
11
91
2/28/97
231
N
1190
10.6
119.6
11
92
'
2/28/97
232
N
1191
11.1
120.8
4
92
2/28/97
233
N
1190
12.5
120
4
92
2/28/97
234
N
1191
12.6
118.9
11
91
2/28/97
235
N
1190
10.1
117.8
8
93
'
3/4/97
236
N
1195.5
10.5
121.3
4
93
3/4/97
237
N
1192.9
11.1
119.3
1
92
3/4/97
238
N
1189.6
12.6
119.9
11
92
3/4/97
239
N
1186
11.6
117.3
11
90
'
3/4/97
240
N
1191,
10
118
11
91
3/4/97
241
N
1189
11.1
115.9
8
92
'
3/4/97
242
N
1190
15.6
114.6
8
91
9
.3/
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1 J.N. 569-96
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING
EASTING ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
'
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
3/4/97
243
N
1190
12.8
119.4
11
92
i3/4/97
244
N
1191
13.9
115.1
10
91
3/4/97
245
N
1191
13.2
118
10
93
3/5/97
246
N
1191
11.9
117
2
91
3/5/97
247
N
1186
13.1
117.2
2
91
N
1182
12.8
119.7
11
92
3/5/97
248
3/5/97
249
N
1190
14
116.3
10
92
'
1191
10.2
120.7
4
92
3/5/97
250
N
3/5/97
251
N
1192
12.9
118.9
11
91
3/5/97
252
N
1198
11.4
117.3
10
92
'
3/6/97
253
N
1182
12.8
117.4
11
90
3/6/97
254
N
1184
13.3
118.4
11
91
'
3/6/97
255
N
1193
10.6
118.4
11
91
3/6/97
256
N
1194
9.6
120.6
11
93
'
3/6/97
257
N
1186
10.8
119.8
11
92
3/6/97
258
N
1187
13
121
11
93
'
3/10/97
259
N
1192
13.1
118
11
91
3/10/97
260
N
1192
14.1
118.2
11
91
3/10/97
261
N
1193
12.3
115.9
8
92
3/10/97
262
N
1196
13.4
117.8
11
91
3/11/97
263
N
1158
12.5
117.5
3
93
3/11/97
264
N
1164
10
118.8
4
91
'
3/11/97
265
N
1159
13.8
117.8
10
93
3/11/97
266
N
1193
12.6
117.4
10
92
'
3/11/97
267
N
1193
12.9
119.6
4
91
/0
1
p
11
33
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
3/11/97
268
N
1202
10.5
119.5
4
91
'
3/12/97
269
N
1169
13.4
118.1
11
91
3/12/97
270
N
1168
11.4
116.9
10
92
3/12/97
271
N
1210
10.5
119.7
13
91
3/12/97
272
N
1215
11.7
120.2
13
92
'
1213
12.8
15.9
10
91
3/12/97
273
N
3/12/97
274
N
1215
13.1
118.1
11
91
'
3/12/97
275
N
1210
10.4
117.2
11
90
3/12/97
276
N
1171
11.6
118
11
91
'
3/12/97
277
N
1170
13.7
118.6
11
91
'
3/12/97
278
N
1193
11.7
117.5
12
91
3/12/97
279
N
1188
13.4
117.8
11
91
r
'
3/13/97
280
N
1212
12.8
115.9
8
92
3/13/97
281
N
1214
13.9
117.3
10
92
3/13/97
282
N
1215
12.1
117.9
11
91
3/14/97
283
N
1173
14.4
113.9
9
92
'
3/14/97
284
N
1174
12.8
114.7
8
91
3/14/97
285
N
1175
12.1
119.2
11
92
3/14/97
286
N
1215
12.6
116.1
8
92
3/14/97
287
N
1217
10.6
119
11
92
'
3/14/97
288
N
1217
10.9
115.7
8
92
3/14/97
289
N
1185
13.1
117.2
11
90
t3/14/97
290
N
1193
11.8
119.5
11
92
3/14/97
291
N
1179
10.4
119.1
it
92
3/18/97
292 294
N
1175
10.8
110.7
10
87
p
11
33
1
1
1
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
3/18/97
293
N
1177
12.3
115
10
91
3/18/97
294
N
1175
13.4
118.2
10
93
3/18/97
295
N
1177
12.3
116.4
10
92
'
3/18/97
296
N
1203
13.5
116.7
10
92
3/18/97
297
N
1205
10.8
117.1
11
90
'
1206
11.7
119.6
4
91
3/18/97
298
N
3/19/97
299
N
1177
12.6
112.3
9
91
1178
10.6
119.1
4
91
3/19/97
300
N
3/19/97
301
N
1179
13.1
114.2
9
92
'
3/19/97
302
N
1179
12.1
119.2
4
91
'
3/19/97
303
N
1187
11.1
117.6
12
91
3/19/97
304 305
N
1196
11.8
110.2
10
87
'
3/19/97
305
N
1196
10.3
117.1
10
92
3/20/97
306
N
1172
12.8
115.4
10
91
'
3/20/97
307
N
1175
14.2
117.9
11
91
3/20/97
308
N
1168
10.9
116.5
10
92
'
3/20/97
309
N
1181
11.2
118.4
11
91
3/20/97
310
N
1183
10.3
118.4
13
90
3/20/97
311
N
1186
11.8
120
13
92
3/20/97
312
N
1198
13.7
114.6
8
91
t3/20/97
313
N
1200
12.8
119.8
11
92
3/21/97
314
N
1175
13.2
115.6
10
91
3/21/97
315
N
1176
12.5
117.1
10
92
3/21/97
316
N
1178
11.7
116.2
10
91
'
3/21/97
317
N
1180
12.8
118.1
11
91
/2
3L
'
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
3/21/97
318
N
1176
12.4
116.3
10
92
'
3/24/97
319
N
1182
11.7
117
2
91
3/24/97
320
N
1179
12.6
118.3
11
91
'
3/24/97
321
N
1178
11.1
116.3
10
92
3/24/97
322
N
1178
12.1
117.8
11
91
'
1181
12.4
117
12
91
3/24/97
323
N
3/24/97
324
N
1180
10.6
115.6
8
92
'
3/25/97
325
N
1201
10.9
118
11
91
'
3/25/97
326
N
1186
12.8
118.2
11
91
3/25/97
327
N
1181
12
118.3
11
91
'
3/25/97
328
N
1180
10.3
117.5
10
93
3/25/97
329
N
1179
11.7
119
4
91
'
3/25/97
330
N
1181
13.4
114.8
8
91
3/26/97
331
N
1187
12.1
115.4
8
92
'
3/26/97
332
N
1195
13.7
115.6
8
92
3/26/97
333
N
1195
12.1
119
4
91
'
3/26/97
334
N
1195
10.3
119.5
4
91
3/26/97
335
N
1182
12.4
116.3
10
92
3/26/97
336
N
1187
10.9
116.1
10
91
3/26/97
337
N
1186
11.6
119
4
91
'
3/26/97
338
N
1183
10.1
117.4
1
92
3/26/97
339
N
1184
11.9
117.3
6
92
'
3/27/97
340
N
1188
10.4
119.4
13
91
3/27/97
341
N
1188
13.4
114.3
8
91
'
3/27/97
342
N
1188
11.6
117.1
10
92
/3
'
3S
14
.d(o
1
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
3/27/97
343
N
1190
13.6
117.6
11
90
'
3/27/97
344
N
1187
10.8
116.8
10
92
3/27/97
345
N
1189
11.3
117.4
10
92
'
3/27/97
346
N
1190
11.1
119.4
ll
92
3/27/97
347
N
1195
13.1
115.5
8
92
'
1194
11.4
118.2
11
91
3/27/97
348
N
3/27/97
349
N
1180
12.1
119.4
11
92
'
93
3/27/97
350
N
1193
11.8
117.6
10
'
3/27/97
351
N
1190
13
117
10
92
3/28/97
352
N
1194
12.6
116
8
92
'
3/28/97
353
N
1197
11
120.4
11
93
3/28/97
354
N
1201
13.3
116.3
8
92
'
3/28/97
355
N
1200
10.4
117.2
8
93
3/28/97
356
N
1202
12.1
119.2
11
92
'
3/28/97
357
N
1189
11.3
117
10
92
3/28/97
358
N
1203
12.5
117.6
12
91
'
3/28/97
359
N
1207
10.2
120.8
13
92
3/28/97
360
N
1209
12.8
113.9
8
90
t3/28/97
361
N
1211
11.1
117.6
12
91
3/31/97
362
N
1220
12.6
117
10
92
3/31/97
363
N
1192
11.9
119.5
13
91
3/31/97
364
N
1193
10.4
117.1
1
91
'
3/31/97
365
N
1190
12.1
116.8
10
92
3/31/97
366
N
1191
11.6
118
12
91
'
4/1/97
367
N
1193
10.2
117.4
1
92
14
.d(o
I
ABLE 1
J.N. 569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING
PARTNERSHIP LTD
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
'
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
4/1/97
368
N
1197
11.3
118.2
11
91
'
4/1/97
369
N
1199
10.6
116.7
1-0
92
4/1/97
370
N
1201
11.9
117
10
92
4/1/97
371
N
1203
12.6
117.9
11
91
4/1/97
372
N
1192
11.2
119.9
4
92
1193
10.9
119.2
4
91
4/1/97
373
N
4/1/97
374
N
1195
11.3
117.2
10
92
'
1205
11.6
118.5
11
91
4/2/97
375
N
4/2/97
376
N
1207
11
117.7
10
92
'
4/2/97
377
N
1209
12.1
118.3
12
92
'
4/2/97
378
N
1197
10.8
116.5
8
92
4/2/97
379
N
1196
11.2
115.7
5
92
4/2/97
380
N
1198
11.6
116.3
5
92
4/3/97
381
N
1211
12.3
117.3
10
92
4/3/97
382
N
1213
11.9
116.4
10
92
'
4/3/97
383
N
1215
10.3
117.1
8
93
'
4/3/97
384
N
1198
11.1
118
11
91
4/3/97
385
N
1198
11.8
118.2
11
91
4/3/97
386
N
1197
11
115.9
8
92
4/3/97
387
N
1200
10.3
117.5
11
90
'
4/7/97
388
N
1199
11.9
116.4
8
92
4/7/97
389
N
1200
11.7
117.8
12
91
4/7/97
390
N
1217
10.2
117.2
10
92
4/7/97
391
N
1218
12.2
117.2
10
92
'
4/7/97
392
N
1218
10.6
116.1
8
92
15
' REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
' TEST TEST RETEST TEST NORTHING EASTING ELEV MOIST. DRY
DATE NO. TYPE DEN.
J.N. 569-96
MAX REL.
NO. COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
4/7/97
393
N
1220
11.9
115.5
8
92
'
4/7/97
394
N
1200
9.9
118.9
11
91
4/7/97
395
N
1201
11.4
118.4
12
92
'
4/4/97
396
N
1202
10.9
116.6
10
92
4/7/97
397
N
1200
10.8
115.9
12
90
'
1201
11.8
117.3
10
92
4/7/97
398
N
4/7/97 -
399
N
1203
11.1
116.3
8
92
'
4/7/97
400
401 N
1203
11.7
110.3
8
88
'
4/7/97
401
N
1203
11.4
1169
8
93
4/7/97
402
N
1204
10.5
119.2
13
91
'
4/7/97
403
N
1204
13.2
117
12
91
4/7/97
404
N
1205
13.8
117.3
11
90
'
4/7/97
405
N
1222
11
116.5
7
93
4/7/97
406
N
1223
11.4
118.1
13
90
'
4/7/97
407
N
1222
11.6
116.1
8
92
4/8/97
408
N
1224
10.4
116.5
10
92
'
4/8/97
409
N
1224
11.1
117.6
11
90
4/9/97
410
N
1223
10.5
119.4
4
91
'
4/9/97
411
N
1225
11.9
114.7
8
91
4/9/97
412
N
1204
13.3
116.5
10
92
4/9/97
413
N
1203
11.6
115.8
1
90
4/9/97
414
N
1204
12.8
115.9
8
92
'
4/9/97
415
N
1214
13.4
117.4
12
91
4/9/97
416
N
1215
12.1
114.8
8
91
'
4/9/97
417
N
1200
11.2
116.5
10
92
16
I
1
/7
.19
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%) .
4/9197
418
N
1184
11.6
116.7
1
91
'
4/9/97
419
N
1223
12.1
114.8
8
91
4/9197
420
N
1223
11.1
117.2
1
92
'
1225
10.2
116.5
12
90
4/9/97
421
N
4/9/97
422
N
1225
12.1
117.4
12
91
'
91
4/9/97
423
N
1226
13
114.8
8
4/10/97
424
N
1227
11.6
116.7
8
93
'
4/10/97
425
N
1227
12.1
117.1
12
91
'
4/10/97
426
N
1225
11.2
116.2
8
92
4/10/97
427
N
1217
12.3
117.5
8
93
1
4/10/97
428
N
1220
11.5
115.3
8
92
4/10/97
429
N
1214
10.4
116.5
8
92
'
4/10/97
430
N
1216
12.6
117
8
93
4/10/97
431
N
1216
11.8
115.4
8
92
'
4/10/97
432
N
1218
12.3
116.7
8
93
4/14/97
433
N
1190
11.4
116.2
8
92
'
4/14/97
434
N
1192
12.9
115.8
10
91
4/14/97
435
N
1195
10.3
117.1
10
92
'
4/14/97
436 438
N
1227
10.2
110.3
8
88
4/14/97
437
N
1227
11.8
117.3
12
91
'
4/14/97
438
N
1227
13.3
116.2
8
92
4/14/97
439
N (
1197
12.1
116.7
10
92
'
4/17/97
440
N
1199
13.5
116.5
10
92
4/17/97
441
N
1200
10.9
116.6
10
92
'
4/17/97
442
N
1200
11
117.4
8
93
1
/7
.19
'
J.N.
569-96
REDHAWK
HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
'
TEST
TEST RETEST
TEST NORTHING EASTING
ELEV
MOIST.
DRY
MAX
REL.
DATE
NO.
TYPE
DEN.
NO.
COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
4/17/97
443
N
1227
11.1
115.8
8
92
'
4/17/97
444
N
1227
10.9
118.6
4
91
4/17/97
445
N
1225
10.5
116.5
10
92
'
1229
11.9
117.3
12
91
4/17/97
446
N
4/17/97
447
N
1218
11.4
115.2
9
93
'
4/17/97
448
N
1220
14.1
115.6
8
92
'
4/17/97
449
N
1227
11.6
115.9
8
92
4/17/97
450
N
1221
12.6
116.8
12
91
4/17/97
451
N
1225
10.5
116.5
92
4/17/97
452
N
1229
11.9
117.3
91
4/17/97
453
N
1218
11.4
115.2
93
4/17/97
454
N
1220
14.1
115.6
92
'
4/17/97
455
N
1229
11.6
115.9
92
4/17/97
456
N
1221
12.6
116.8
91
'
4/18/97
457
N
1206
10
117.5
12
91
4/18/97
458
N
1204
13
116.5
8
92
'
4/18/97
459
N
1206
11.9
114.7
9
93
4/18/97
460
N
1208
11.6
115.8
8
92
'
4/18/97
461
N
1202
11.6
116.8
8
93
4/18/97
462
N
1203
10.7
119
11
92
4/18/97
463
N
1228
13.5
115.1
8
91
4/18/97
464
N
1228
13.8
117.5
12
91
'
4/18/97
465
N
1202
11.4
116.9
8
93
4/18/97
466
N
1202
12.4
115.1
9
93
'
1205
12.2
117.4
11
90
4/18/97
467
N
18
I
REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE I
' TEST TEST RETEST TEST NORTHING EASTING ELEV MOIST. DRY
DATE NO. TYPE DEN.
J.N. 569-96
MAX REL.
NO. COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
4/18/97
468
N
1230
11
116
9
94
4/18/97
469
N
1230
12.2
117.1
11
90
4/18/97
470
N
1204
11
117.8
7
92
'
471
N
1199
11.6
118
11
91
4/21/97
4/21/97
472
N
1197
11.8
117.1
8
93
1232
10.2
116.8
8
93
4/21/97
473
N
'
4/21/97
474
N
1232
13.8
117.7
10
93
5/2/97
475
N
1209
11.5
115.7
8
92
'
5/2/97
476
N
1208
10.7
119.5
11
92
5/2/97
477
N
1208
12.3
120.7
11
93
'
5/2/97
478
N
1207
11
116.5
10
92
5/2/97
479
N
1206
10.3
119.9
11
92
5/2/97
480
N
1205
11.9
116.3
8
92
5/2/97
481
1197
12.5
120.5
11
93
5/2/97
482
N
1192
11.8
119
11
92
5/5/97
483
N
1229
10.4
118
11
91
'
5/5/97
484
N
1231
11.4
115.6
8
92
5/7/97
485
N
1194
11.8
117.8
11
91
5/7/97
486
N
1194
10.3
116.4
8
92
5/7/97
487
N
1195
12.6
116
8
92
5/7/97
488
N
1183
11
115.1
9
93
5/7/97
489
N
1182
11.4
118
11
91
'
5/7/97
490
N
1194
11.9
115.5
8
92
5/7/97
491
N
1196
11.6
118.3
11
91
'
5/7/97
492
N
1209
12.6
115.6
8
92
19
40
I
, REDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
' TEST TEST RETEST TEST NORTHING EASTING
DATE NO. TYPE 11
ELEV MOIST
J.N. 569-96
DRY MAX REL.
DEN. NO. COMP.
20
0
ytt
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
5/13/97
493
N
1209
11.1
116.4
8
92
'
5/13/97
494
N
1209
13.5
116
9
94
5/13/97
495
N
1209
12.5
114
9
92
496
N
1208
11
117.5
10
93
5/13/97
5/13/97
497
N
1207
12.8
114.2
9
92
1207
13.3
116.2
8
92
5/14/97
498
N
'
5/14/97
499
N
1206
11.3
114.9
9
93
5/14/97
500
N
1182
11.9
115.7
8
92
5/14/97
501
N
1183
10.2
116.7
8
93
'
6/9/97
502
N
1198
11.1
117.9
12
91
'
6/9/97
503
N _
1206
13.2
113.6
9
92
6/9/97
504
N
1208
14.3
115.1
8
91
'
6/9/97
505
N
1213
10.6
116.1
8
92
6/9/97
506
N
1215
11.7
116.6
8
93
'
6/9/97
507
N
1217
13.5
117.4
9
95
6/9/97
508
N
1219
12.1
115.3
8
91
'
6/9/97
509
N
1223
11.4
117.1
8
93
6/9/97
510
N
1223
13.3
114.4
8
91
6/17/97
511
N
1229
12.3
115
8
91
6/17/97
512
N
1230
10.6
117.8
8
94
6/17/97
513
N
1232
11.3
115.4
8
92
6/17/97
514
N
1234
13.8
115.7
8
92
'
6/17/97
515
N
1236
11.1
115.6
100
91
6/17/97
516
N
1234
11.9
116.5
8
92
'
6/17/97
517
N
1236
12.6
114.9
8
91
20
0
ytt
tREDHAWK HOMEBUILDING PARTNERSHIP LTD ABLE 1
' TEST TEST RETEST TEST NORTHING EASTING ELEV MOIST. DRY
DATE NO. TYPE DEN.
J.N. 569-96
MAX REL.
NO. COMP.
'
(FT)
(%)
(PCF)
(%)
6/17/97
518
N
1237
11.7
117.4
8
93
N
1239
13.5
116.3
8
92
6/17/97
519
6/19/97
520
N
1238
11.9
115.5
8
92
116.5
8
92
6/19/97
521
N
1236
11.3
'
6/19/97
522
N
1235
12.2
116.6
8
93
6/19/97
523
N
1238
10.3
116.9
8
93
6/19/97
524
N
1236
14.1
115.5
9
93
1'
6/19/97
525
N
1235
12.8
115.4
8
92
'
6/19/97
526
N
1226
10.9
115.8
8
92
6/19/97
527
N
1228
10.4
113.5
9
92
'
6/20/97
528
N
1230
12.1
116.2
8
92
6/20/97
529
N
1231
10.2
128.6
10
92
6/20/97
530
N
1230
11.9
131.8
11
91
6/20/97
531
N
1231
10.9
130.7
2
91
'
6/20/97
532
N
1231
11.9
129.4
8
92
6/24/97
533
N
1240
12.5
129.6
8
91
'
6/24/97
534
N
1239
11.1
128.8
8
92
6/24/97
535
N
1238
13.6
132.1
10
92
6/24/97
536
N
1237
13.1
130.6
8
92
6/24/97
537
N
1237
12.1
128.3
9
92
'
6/24/97
538
N
1236
10.4
129.2
8
93
D- Drive Tube
'
N- Nuclear
S- Sand Cone
21
W3