Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLots 1-7, 62-69 Precise Grading Documents.a a �55� '204f 40AC A,00e.va/ i�7/oo L®TS 1-7, bZ-409 5 _. ____. ' =MavR f140 4nn-711 MRP; 1 " 6 6-�4rov-772 2 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT 4: 2GR000732 Job Address: 33770 ABBEY RD TEM Status: ISSUED Issued: 11/16/2000 Expires: 05/15/2001 Work Desc: PRECISE GRADE TR23067-4 LOTS 1-7, 62-69 Parcel No: 952-452-001 Location: TR23067-4 LOTS 1-7, 62-69 Tract/Lot: TR23067-4 LOTS 1-7, 62-69 Zoning:SP ZONE APPLICANT CENTEX HOMES Phone: 909 279--4000 2280 WARDLOW CIR, CORONA CA 91720 OWNER CENTEX HOMES 2280 WARDLOW CIR Ivo 150, CORONA CA 917200000 FEE INFORMATION Plan Check Fees.: 2,251.78 Transfer Fee..... .00 Permit Fees.....: 1,938.45 Renewal Fee.....: .00 Addl Inspections: .00 Microfilm Fees..: 6.50 Addl LMS Surchg.: .10 Total Calculated Fees: 4,196.83 Additional Fees: 57.85 Total Permit Fees: 4,254.68 CALL FOR INSPECTION Requests for inspection shall be made at least 24 hours in advance by telephone at (909) 600-6100 Additional info at www.tlma.co.riverside.ca.us/lms/lms.htm COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of Building and Safety BUILDING_ PERMIT This permit shall expire by limitation and become null and void if work is not commenced and a written request for inspection filed within 180 days from the date of issuance or if work has been suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days between the filing of written requests for inspection. ICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION: I hereby affirm under penalty of perm that 1 am licensed under previsions of Chapter 9 (commerr��gqing with Section 7000) of Divisigqrt� 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. License ClaLsss 15 License No. 2Z OR `t Date LAp cA Contractor Q).� ❑ OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that 1 am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that heor she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law (Chapter9(commencing with Section 70001 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the aIle ed exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five undred dollars [$500].): ❑ I, as owner ofthe roperty, ormy employees with wages as their sole compensation, or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors Licens who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or herself or through improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improve owner -budder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not build or improve f ❑ 1 as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to Professions Code: The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of prop contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractors Lic ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. , B.&P.C. for this reason will do the work, and the structure is not intended e Law does not apply to the owner of Property his or her own employees, provided that such ment is sold within one year of completion, the or the purpose of sale.). construct the Project (Sec. 7044, Business and erty who builds or improves thereon, and who ense Law.). Date Owner El -'WORKERS COMPENSATION DECLARATION: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: ❑ 1 have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers compensation, as provided for by Section 370 of the Labor Code ' f the erformance of the work for which this permit is issued. u Niave andpwill maintain workers compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this pert tit,'d. �v► workers compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Carrier Policy Number VVI`--�s-- O This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars or less . ❑ I certify that in the pe ormar oft to work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers compensation laws of Califomia, and agree that if I should become subject to the workers compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions. Date: �1�L�Applicant: WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ. C. . Lender's Name Lender's Address CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AND AUTHORIZATION OF ENTRY: I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize re resentatives of this county to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. X � 5 2Rok.A �,_, 'e'i.m�l2_ Ili.,% Signature o Lcant or een— — Print oo rcan Bent ame ate' INSPECTION INFORMATION': Work may proceed only at the direction of the field inspector. To request an inspection of work completed, call the appropriate o ice listedbelow. Our office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. West County: Riverside Office 909)) 955-1800 South County: South County Office (909) 600-6100 East County: Indio Office (76 0) 863-8271 REINSPECTION FEE: Reinspection fees maybe assessed when the permit card is not properly posted on the work site, the approved plans are not readily available tot e inspector, for failure to provide access on the date for which the inspection is requested, or for deviating from plans requiring approval of the Building Official. A reinspection fee may be assessed for each inspection or reinspection when such portion of work for which inspection is called is not complete or when corrections previously called for are not made. OCCUPANCY: Buildings or structures shall not be used or occupied until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy (or for residential we ind�' g� sign -off of the final inspection on the job card by the building inspector). 284-208 (09199) RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY 4 •X APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT WORKSHEET 0/6/00 ROUGH GRADE LOG If: BGR990024 284-199 (Ras 5)981 ?"h I nt 2 1u. et) nail # PROJECT INFORMATION oov '7 ; Jobsile Address Street Nome Rd/SI/Etc Spau• # ABBEY ROAD / LOVE COURT – – '1'Imums Guide Page No. 4rid 1 ecaliun — - 979 J-2 (1998 Edition) City/Community State Zip Code Assessor's rarest Num Ler 952-451-017 to 020 TEMECULA CA 952-452-001 to 003 Properly Owner's Name: Last Fh st 952-482-045 to 048 CENTEX HOMES – OFFICE USE ONLI' Planning Case # (CUP,, PP, etc) Parcel(1'racl Ntap # Pon/Lot TR23067-4 TRACT MAP NO. 23067-4 Legal Zone Lot Size F/A Depth Frontage F Sit Lf Sit III Sll It Sll APPLICATION INFORNIATION NOTE: The applicant gill receive ALL billings, correspondence :Incl relLndl fur deposit. based fee permits. Applicant Name: Last Firs[ CENTEX HOMES (ATTN: TOM GIBSON) Mailing Address Street Name Rd/SI/Ela. Space # 2280 WARDLOW CIRCLE 150 City/Community Slate Zip Cudc I'hone Number CORONA CA 91720 ( 909) 279-4000 Permit Use: Valuation PRECISE GRADING (PHASE 8) - LOTS 1-7 & 62-69 Has or will grading exceed 58 cubic yards? (circle one) YES NO Your Initials: Has or will fill be greater than one fool? (ch-cle onel YES NO Ynur Initials: CONTRACTOR OR OWNER/BUILDER INFORNIA'1'ION (ciule one) California Contractor License # 'IVpe Esp. Date Firm Nunn, CENTEX HOMES Mailing Address Street Name Rd/SUElc. Space # 2280 WARDLOW CIRCLE 150 City/Cmmnmnity Stale Zip Gude Phone Number — CORONA oJA 91721) (909) 279_4000 CONTRACTOR OR OWNEN/m l 11. D E It INFO RN LC I7 ON tau cle one) —_ License# Is In• Finn N:une (At tn: Paul HuddleSLon) PE 58020 :N(, l HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. Mailing Address Sure) Net, - ltd/SI/Ftc. Space k 2900 ADAMS ST A-15 Cdp/Comuwolb' Slalr pp Pude Phone Nantber "..----- RIVERSIDE CA 925114— 1 909 1 352-71n11 ROUGH GRADE LOG If: BGR990024 284-199 (Ras 5)981 ?"h I nt 2 1u. et) i 1&-02-2000 TRU 01149 PN PETRA TEMECULA FAX N0, 908t3i39151W PETRA I _,.. +I COStk Pnl sn 6 EnY DIf:GU . TF.NXtA.A La? gr;GEi, FQ i Novemh 2, 2000 J -N. I is -00 OPC No. Ci12g00732A C:1;NTP,X HOMES 1s.9 2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 150 C;urtnta, Callfonda 91720 Attention: Mr, Tuin Gibson Subject: Response to RlvcxEide County Pitluning Depurtnicut Ike -port Review Sheet, for Craning Plan Check No. Traci 2.30674, Tcnloeuht Arca, Riverside County, C Rol"Orencel f elrn GwIvImical, Inc., 2000, Geotechnical I{rporl of Roughradius, Lots I through 25 and 46 through 94, Tract 23067•4, txlhawk nuveiopmrht, "Tetnecultt Area, Riverside County, Cillfort+ia, 1. N. 141.99, Own July 17, 2000, 1 Peu'a Gootcchniettl, Ine. (Pctrs) is providing this response to RiversidelCounty Pla+ming Department's geotechnical review sheet dated October 24, 2000 for the subjccr tract. Provided liorein are tlw specific comments and point -by -point i'osponsc to each iteral. A copy of the review sheet is included at the end of this respnse fur your convenict7co, fillltl3 of 044 — "Satbick hetweon graded slopes (steeper than 2 hnriontal 10 I vertiCnl arld gr:tdW slopes higher than 30') aid structures shall bra det rmined by a slope stability uflalysi.v which shall provide adequate protection for the Structure ill Vise of slope Flilure. Cotuply at: Lots 63 aid 66. e0457 J " 13L:S18N+Fx^ – The setback for both Lots 65 And 66 shall be HCL but not tn' exceed 1.1 feet maximum. Therefore, the setback from the too-ofalope to race -of, structure shall be 15 Not. Duan ra,,o.l'CI I; Dr:A4 uuu;.. M14C'a1n%i,r,ua,Crrd,,:rr.St, 10.1 Trtv.:,rt, �� c:A ve'att n:M Ci?'7) 69C 6191 I'r•f ltd:, I!4 en h;d 9L 30Vd 69Z9 LSE 606 0099V D' H3M V9N!1H ZE'ZI (3ni) 00 AaN 06/26/2001 12:20 9093031186 LEDHJCD M PAGE 05 PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING GOVERNMENT RELATIONS HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES I R V 1 N E, I N C. INLAND EMPIRE REGION Date: June13..= IRVINE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GRADING DEPARTMENT SAN DIEGO Department of Building and Safety 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: District Grading Inspector Subj: Civil Engineers Certification of Final Grading Reference: Address RECEIVED County of Riverside Building & Safety JUN 2'7 2001 MURRIETA Tract No. kD1 irk through . inch ISNA: 1 1 1 . u . .. . :L- -Ea 51 through . Developer -E •au es I hereby approve the final grading for the referenced project in accordance with my responsibilities under the Riverside County Grading and Excavation Codes. Final Grading has been completed in conformance with the approved grading plan which includes: completion of all engineered drainage devices and retaining walls, setting of all monuments in accordance with the recorded tract map, location and inclination of all manufactured slopes, and construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage. HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. Inland Empire Region �opn °rsD10 `, PRINCIPALS: 2/ (i/Mo.'RB/07O/ 1 BRADLEY B. HAY Paul Huddleston, Jr. * E*' L PAUL HUDDLESTON RCE 8020 fl7 CIYII- Exp. Date: 06/30/02 rn1�F 1900 Adams Ssrees Sulk A-15 Riverside, Ca6fomu 9150. (909) 351-7300 PH (909)351.9169 EX .,.w hunsakeccom W.O. #919-23067 06/26/2001 12:20 PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING GOVERNMENT RELATIONS 9093031186 HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES 1 R V 1 N E, 1 N C. INLAND EMPIRE REGION LEDHJCD M IRVINE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GRADING DEPARTMENT SAN DIEGO Department of Building and Safety 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: District Grading Inspector Subj: Civil Engineer's Certification of Final Grading Reference: Address 1,1842 Abbey Road Tract No. 71(10 Lot (s) ZCflmwu= Developer C nth PAGE 06 RECEIVED County of Riverside Building & Safety JUN 272001 MURRIETA I hereby approve the final grading for the referenced project in accordance with my responsibilities under the Riverside County Grading and Excavation Codes. Final Grading has been completed in conformance with the approved grading plan which includes: completion of all engineered drainage devices and retaining walls, setting of all monuments in accordance with the recorded tract map, location and inclination of all manufactured slopes, and construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage. HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC -!' - �,:.. Inland Empire Region /•.aj Y�+��tlir,;i w � / w. a Ne. SBCc-0 Pa . Huddleston, Jr. fr Crvrt PRINcIPALs: RCE 58020 A�bt• D,c,114� BRADLEY B. NAY - - PAUL HUDDLESTON Exp. Date: 06/30/02 W.O. #919-23067 29UO Adams Svect SUite A - I S Rivmside. Caldomia 9250A 19091352-7200 PH 19091 1152.8269 f R w. . hunsaker.com Permit # PLAN REVIEW OVERTIME APPLICATION 000 7 32 - Date OCTOBER 6, 2000 Activity Address REDHAWK — TRACT NO. 23067-4 (PHASE 8 — LOTS 1-7 & 62-69) Person Requesting Overtime Processing PAM QUENZLER ON BEHALF OF CENTEX HOMES Please Print Relation to Project ENGINEER (HUNSAKER & ASSOC) Phone Number 909/352-7200 Agent, Owner, Contractor, Architect, Engineer r A X SS 2--SZ(.q Reason for requiring overtime consideration's FAST—TRACK (READY TO GRADE) This overtime request is limited, as follows: ❑ limit to hours ❑ limit to work prior to ❑ additional limitation: (date) ❑ No limit. Initial plan review and rechecks are to be done on overtime *I understand that if this overtime for plan review and processing is approved, that additi ,41 charges will be incurred and assessed to the project. Signature review and processing X¢APPROVED /❑ DENIED Office Manager L 1J RECEIVED ;:County"oc.Riv©rside. aUt((iina.RJS3fahi,: RESPONSE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENI'GEOTECHNICA.L REPORT REVIEW SHEET FOR.GRA DING PLAN CHECK NO-GR000731A 'TRA T23Q�7-4, REDNA'WK DEVELOPMENT TEMfC ULA AREA RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ;CALIFnRNIA •2280'Wa�dlOw.Gircle,,Sutte150 '``,.T', •.F•' - " Coroha,,Ca/ifo`riria 91720. " It ": o pthber:2;{2000 .. , CENTEX HOMES November 2, 2000 TR 23067-4/Temecula Area J.N. 118-00 Page 2 The slope stability analysis for the fill slope above Lots 65 and 66 is attached. The analysis indicates the fill slope and the natural slope above the fill slope are stable. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. if you have any questions, please contact this office. Respectfully submitted, G�NEERING G e G BER`r-, —�10 PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. c 'Jt S yv0. 1,_ 3 R.•�_ y GI y�y �,•�/GMYI�_� T ark B arm Stephen M. Poo / rmcipal Geologist Senior Associate Nt ,�4 CEG 1348 GE 692 SMP/MB/keb Attachments: Copy of Riverside County Planning Department Review Sheet Appendix - Slope Stability Analysis - Lots 65 and 66 Distribution: (4) Addressee (1) Hunsaker and Associates Attention: Ms. Laura Keehnel ZIP ' TO TEE APPLICANT: The following list of corrections nirdanyO1and ta resubmitthnd jlow-�D. Please revise he these for recheck including a plans and supporting calculations, t'. correction response- indicate On the corrected plan where the corrections are made and 'clearly distinguish all revisions using clouds, revision triangles, etc. so plan check can be accomnlished in a timely warner. ' g*•J-ILDINo AND SAFETY, GF.FSIINC DIVISION PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS << ' + SITE :TR 23067-4 PREC=SP GRADE + P/C LOG M : GR000732A + EY :PAUL EOLF'AGFiA.? I . P . E . + PHONE:909-600-6118 + DATE : 10/24/2000 l TP f-'7 Z'z-4, i ' + _, -> OALGP_------ ------------=o r_. -_-_---_-___---__-'-iiia__-_-_-__-- `_-__—________ GE4 Correct drainage swales smu soot elevations, minim slope is la- Comply a ' Lot 64 northerly ci=eyard swale. Lot 65 southerly sideyard scale. ' I UI W( 0t F;1''t4'c1L'- r.jI._._ ..­ _ __. - _... _ ' 044 Setback be_ween graced slopes (steeper than 2 horizontal to vertical and ort. ' TO TEE APPLICANT: The following list of corrections nirdanyO1and ta resubmitthnd jlow-�D. Please revise he these for recheck including a plans and supporting calculations, t'. correction response- indicate On the corrected plan where the corrections are made and 'clearly distinguish all revisions using clouds, revision triangles, etc. so plan check can be accomnlished in a timely warner. ' g*•J-ILDINo AND SAFETY, GF.FSIINC DIVISION PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS << ' + SITE :TR 23067-4 PREC=SP GRADE + P/C LOG M : GR000732A + EY :PAUL EOLF'AGFiA.? I . P . E . + PHONE:909-600-6118 + DATE : 10/24/2000 l TP f-'7 Z'z-4, i ' + _, -> OALGP_------ ------------=o r_. -_-_---_-___---__-'-iiia__-_-_-__-- `_-__—________ GE4 Correct drainage swales smu soot elevations, minim slope is la- Comply a ' Lot 64 northerly ci=eyard swale. Lot 65 southerly sideyard scale. ' Lot 68 southerly -__•`eyard swale. <L3315> 044 Setback be_ween graced slopes (steeper than 2 horizontal to vertical and ort. sloes higher than 30" and structures shall be de-e=4ned b a slope staril`_ty -alvsis which shall rovide a:eauace pretecticn the - _l_eture in case O` =_lope failure. Comnly at: F Lots E5 and 66. <04st> y_ 010 Plans mist be stamper and u;et sicnec: t^• crec Cyril engineer. Please submit 3 r-_'J1scd coi _i Cs. <PE673 7.1> » G2000732A << Page 1 of 1 w m m iiiliils m iiia m m m m m m m m m_ m m 280 al M Centex Redhawk Tract 23067-4, Lots 65166Temeculla, California c:1STEDWIMWIEXAMP1 PL2 Run By: Petra Geotechnical, Inc. 11/022000 11:04 # FS —d1.58 Soil Soil 'rota) Saturated Cohesion =ricfion Piez. a 1.55Desc. Type Unit Wt. UnitNtt. Intercept Angle Surfa( b 1.56 No. (pcf) (Pcf) (psf) (deg) No. c 1.58 Fill 1 135.0 135.() 160.0 33.0 0 IJative 2 ' 130.0 130.0 50.0 30.0 0 e 1.63 -- f 1.63 g 1.63 h 1.64 1 1.64 200 160 120 80 40 s 2 0 L 0 40 It PETRA a I a ,�_ fc 80 12D 160 200 240 280 320 GS1ABL7 FSmin=1.55 Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Bishop Method 360 400 I 1 1 11 [l I �I 1 C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Page 1 *** GSTABL7 *** ** GSTABL7 by Garry H. Gregory, P.E. ** ** Version 1.0, January 1996; Version 1.14, Sept 1999 ** --slope Stability Analysis— Simplified Janbu, Modified Bishop or Spencer's Method of Slices (Based on STABL6-1986, by Purdue University) Run Date: 11/02/2000 Time of Run: 11:04 Run By: Petra Geotechnical, Inc. Input Data Filename: C:g'lexampl.in Outnut Filename: C.:g7exampl.OUT Unit System: English Plotted Output Filename: C:g7exampl.PLT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION Ccntcx Rcdhawk Tract 23067-4, Lots 65/66 Temecula, California BOUNDARY COORDINATES Note: User origin value specified. Add 0.00 to X -values and 0.00 to Y -values listed. 7 Top Boundaries 10 Total Boundaries Boundary X -Left Y -Left X -Right Y -Right Soil Type No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Bnd 1 0.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 1 2 120,00 ^.0.00 95.10 65.00 1 3 95.10 65.00 99.00 65.00 2 4 99.00 65.00 162.00 96.00 2 5 162.00 96.00 182.00 96.00 2 6 182.00 96.00 332.00 146.00 2 7 332.00 146.00 375.00 146.00 2 8 0.00 30.00 ^.0.00 30.00 2 9 40.00 30.00 95.00 60.00 2 10 95.00 60.00 95.10 65.00 2 ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS 2 Type(s) of Soil Soil Total Saturated Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Piez. Typc Unit:.,t. Unit Wt. Intercept Angle Pressuro Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Param. (psf) No. 1 135.0 135.0 160.0 33.0 0.00 0.0 0 2 1330.0 130.0 50.0 30.0 0.00 0.0 0 Searching Routine Will Be Limited To An Area Defined By 3 Boundaries Of Which The First 3 Boundaries Will Deflect Surfaces Upward Boundary X -Left Y -Left X -Right Y -Right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 21.50 ln,0o 111.00 22.00 2 111.00 22.00 160.40 43.00 3 160.40 43.00 200.00 51.00 SEARCH LIMIT BOUNDARY DATA HAS BEEN SUPPRESSED A Critical Failure Surface Searching Method, Using A Random Technique For Generating Circular Surfaces, Has Been Specified. 400 Trial Surfaces Havc Bccn Generated. 40 Surfaces Initiate From Each Of 10 Points Equally Spaced Along The Ground Surface Between X = 0.00(ft) and = 50.00(ft) Each Surface Terminates Between X = 150.00(ft) and X = 360.00(ft) Unless Further Limitations Were Imposed, The Minimum Elevation At Which A Surface Extends Is Y = 20.00(ft) 15.00(ft) Line Segments Define Each Trial Failure Surface. Following Are Displayed The Ten Most Critical Of The Trial Failure Surfaces Examined. They Are Ordered - Most Critical ' First. * * Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Bishop Method Failure Surface Specified By 10 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf Page 2 C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT No. (ft) (f t) 1 50.00 44.54 2 64.90 46.28 3 79.62 49.13 4 94.10 53.08 5 108.23 58.11 6 121.95 64.18 7 135.17 71.26 ' 8 147.83 79.31 9 159.84 88.29 10 168.70 96.00 Circle Center At X= e. 3 4 4. Y 2 t = 4.,. _ a.... a.._us, and Radius, 99 t 1.... ' *** 1.555 *** Individual data on the 14 slices Water Water Tie Tie Earthquake Force Force Force Force Force Surcharge Slice Width Weight Top Bot Norm Tan Hor Ver Load No. (ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) 1 14.9 5046.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 3 7.7 6230.8 0.0 7.1 7505.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 14.5 19511.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 0.9 1375.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 0.1 151.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 3.9 5509.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 8 9.2 12962.^ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 13.7 20997.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0" 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 13.2 20334.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 12.7 17198.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 12.0 12786.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 2.2 1750.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1^. 6.7 2510.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Failure Surface Specified By 11 Point X-Surf Y-Surf Coordinate Points (ft) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.44 42.40 74.33 44.22 ,s 4 88.97 47.48 5 103.23 52.13 6 116.98 58.14 7 130.08 65.44 8 142.41 73.98 9 153.87 83.66 10 164.33 94.40 11 155.61 Circle Center At X = 96.00 48.0 ; Y = 197.3 and Radius, 155.3 *** 1.560 *** e Failure Surface Specified Ey 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 50.00 44.54 2 64.97 45.48 3 79.83 47.56 4 94.48 50.76 5 108.85 55.05 6 122.86 60.43 7 136.42 66.84 8 149.45 9 161_88 74.27 82.66 10 173.65 91.97 11 178.02 96.00 Circle Center At X = 45.0 ; Y = 212.4 and Radius, 198.0 *** 1.581 *** ' Failure Surface Specified By 10 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf Page 2 I C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Page 3 No. (ft) (ft) 1 50.00 44.54 ' 2 64.99 44.09 3 79.95 45.29 4 94.67 48.14 5 109.00 52.60 ' 6 122.74 58.61 7 135.74 66.09 8 147,83 74.97 9 158.87 85.12 10 168.34 96.00 ' Circle Center At X = 61.E ; Y = 179.7 and Radius, 135.7 *** 1.584 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 38.89 40.00 2 53.80 38.32 3 68.80 38.37 ' 4 83.69 40.14 5 98.29 43.60 6 112.39 48.72 7 125.81 55.42 8 138.37 63.62 ' 9 149.90 73.20 10 160.27 84.05 11 169.30 96.00 Circle Center At X = 60.9 ; Y = 168.6 and Radius, 130.5 •** 1.625 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.39 40.74 3 74.39 41.07 4 89.26 42.99 5 103.85 46.49 6 117.98 51.52 7 131.49 58.03 8 144.23 65.95 9 156.06 75.18 10 166.83 85.62 li 175.17 96.00 Circle Center At X = 63.9 ; Y = 181.1 and Radius, 140.4 *** 1.626 *** Failurc Surfacc Spccificd By 12 Ccordinatc Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 22.22 40.00 2 37.10 38.06 ' 3 52.09 37.63 4 67.05 38.71 5 81.82 41.31 6 96.26 45.38 7 110.21 50.89 8 123.53 57.79 9 135.09 65.99 10 147.75 75.43 ' 11 158.40 85.99 12 16E.63 96.00 Circle Center At X = 48.9 ; Y = 185.5 and Radius, 147.9 *** 1.632 *** Failurc Surfacc Spccificd By 13 Coordinatc Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf ' No. (ft) (ft) 1 22.22 40.00 I 1 C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Page 4 2 37.10 38.05 3 52.08 37.47 4 67.06 38.25 1 5 81.91 40.39 6 96.50 43.88 7 110.71 48.68 8 121.42 54.76 1 9 137.53 62.06 10 149.91 70.53 11 161.17 80.09 12 172.11 90.66 13 176.58 96.00 ' Circle Center At X = 51.0 ; Y = 201.9 and Radius, 164.^. *** 1.642 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf 1 No. (ft) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.21 44.65 1 3 73.86 47.88 4 88.37 51.69 5 102.71 56.09 6 116.86 61.07 7 130.80 66.61 8 144.50 72.71 1 9 157.94 79.36 10 171.11 86.55 11 183.97 94.27 12 191.38 99.13 1 Circle Center At X = -12.9 ; Y = 107.0 and Radius, 369.5 *** 1.643 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points 1 Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 27.78 40.00 2 42.71 38.61 3 57.71 38.92 4 79.57 40.94 1 5 87.11 44.64 6 101.13 49.97 7 114.46 56.86 8 126.91 65.22 1 9 138.33 74.95 10 118.57 85.91 11 152.62 91.38 Circle Center At X = 47.5 ; Y = 170.1 and Radius, 131.5 1 •+* 1.653 +++ 1 I 1 1 1 1 IM M M M m m m= m w r= M Mm mm mm 280 240 Centex Redhawk Tract 23067-4, Lots 65/66 -Temecula, California C.\STEDWIN\G7D"F1l.PL.2 Run By Petra Geotechnical, Inc. 11102/2000 11:03 # FS Soil Soil 'rotal Saturated Cohesion=ricfion Piez. a 1.10 IDesc. Type Unit Wt. Unit M. Intercept Angle Surfaa b 1.11 No. (pcf) (pct) (psf) (deg) No. c 1.11 Fill 1 '135.0 135.0 160.0 33.0 0 d 1.13 IJative 2 '130.0 130.0 50.0 30.0 0 e 1.14 --- f 1.15 g '1.16 h 1.16 1 1,16 200 160 120 80 40o� E— 8 2 0 I 0 40 C T1 a t '4_ fc e Va ue 0.150 g 80 1210 160 200 240 280 320 GSTABL7 FSmin=1.10 Safety Factors Are Caloulated By The Modified Bishop Method 7 2 360 400 I 1 1 C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Page 1 *** GSTlaL7 *t* ** GSTABL7 by Garry H. Gregory, P.E. ** ** Version 1.0, January 1996; version 1.14, Sept 1999 ** --Slope Stability Analysis -- Simplified Janbu, Modified Bishop or Spencer's Method of Slices (Based on STABLE -1586, by Purdue University) Run Date: 11/02/2000 Time of Run: 11:03 Run By: Petra Geotechnical, Inc. Input Data Filename: C:g7exampl.in Outnut Filename: C:g7examnl.00T Unit System: English Plotted Output Filename: C:g7exampl.PLT PROBLEM. DESCRIPTION Ccntcx Rcdhawk Tract 23067-4, Lots 65/66 Temecula, California BOUNDARY COORDINATES Note: User origin value specified. Add 0.00 to X -values and 0.00 to Y -values listed. ' 7 Top Boundaries 10 Total Boundaries Boundary X -Left Y -Left X -Right Y -Right Soil Type No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Bnd 1 0.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 1 2 ^.0.00 40.00 95.10 65.00 1 3 95.10 65.00 99.00 65.00 2 4 99.00 65.00 162.00 96.00 2 5 162.00 96.00 182.00 96.00 2 ' 6 182.00 96.00 332.00 146.00 2 7 332.00 146.00 375.00 146.00 2 8 0.00 30.00 ^,0.00 30.00 2 ' 9 10 40.00 95.00 30.00 60.00 95.00 95.10 60.00 65.00 2 2 ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS 2 Type(s) of Soil 1 I Soil Total Saturated Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Piez. TypoVnit Wt. vnit Wt. Intercept Anglc Pressure Constant Surfacc No. (pcf) (pcf)(psf) (deg) Param. (psf) No. 1 135.0 135.0 160.0 33.0 0.00 0.0 0 2 130.0 130.0 50.0 30.0 0.00 0.0 0 Searching Routine Will Be Limited To An Area Defined By 3 Boundaries Of Which The First 3 Boundaries Will Deflect Surfaces Upward Boundary X -Left Y -Left X -Right Y -Right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 21.50 10.00 111.00 22.00 2 111.00 22.00 160.40 43.00 3 160.40 43.00 200.00 51.00 SEARCH LT_MIT BOUNDARY DATA HAS BEEN SUPPRESSED A Horizontal Earthquake Loading Coefficient Of0.150 Has Been Assigned A Vertical Earthquake Loading Coefficient Of0.000 Has Been Assigned Cavitation Pressure = 0.0(psf) A Critical Failure Surface Searching Method, Using A Random Technique For Generating Circular Surfaces, Has Been Specified. 400 Trial Surfaces Have Been Generated. 40 Surfaces Initiate From Each Of 10 Points Equally Spaced Along The Ground Surface Between X = 0.00(ft) and X = 50.00(ft) Each Surface Terminates Between X = 150.00(ft) and X = 360.00(ft) Unless Furthcr Limitations Wcrc Imposed, The Minimum Elevation At Which A Surface Extends Is Y = 20.00(ft) 15.00(ft) Line Segments Define Each Trial Failure Surface. Following Are Displayed The Ten Most Critical Of The Trial I ' C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Failurc Surfaccs Examincd. Thcy Arc Ordcrcd - Most Critical First. ' * * Safety Factors Are Failure surface Specified Calculated By The Modified By 10 Coordinate Points Bishop Method Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 50.00 44.54 ' 2 64.90 46.28 3 79.62 49.13 4 94.10 53.08 5 106.23 58.11 6 121.95 64.1E ' 7 135.17 71.26 8 147.83 79.31 9 159.8^. 88.29 10 168.70 96.00 Circle Center At X = 34.4 ; Y = 243.1 and Radius, 199.1 *** 1 inn *** Individual data on the 14 slices Water Water Tie Tie Earthquake ' rcc Forcc Forcc Forcc Forcc Surchargc Slice Width Weight Top Bot Norm Tan Hor Ver Load No. (ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) 1 14.9 5046.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 756.9 0.0 0.0 2 7.7 6230.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 934.6 0.0 0.0 3 7.1 7505.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1125.7 0.0 0.0 4 14.5 19511.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2926.8 0.0 0.0 5 0.9 1375.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206.3 0.0 0.0 6 0.1 151.4 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 7 3.9 5509.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 826.4 0.0 0.0 8 9.2 12962.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1944.4 0.0 0.0 9 13.7 20997.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3119.6 0.0 0.0 ' 10 11 13:2 20334.2 0.0 12.7 17488.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3050.1 2623.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 12.0 12786.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1918.0 0.0 0.0 13 2.2 1750.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 262.6 0.0 0.0 14 6.7 2540.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 381.1 0.0 0.0 Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points ' Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (£t) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.44 42.40 ' 3 74.33 44.22 4 88.97 47.48 5 103.23 52.13 6 116.98 7 130.08 58.14 65.44 8 142.41 73.98 9 153.87 03.66 10 164.33 94.40 11 165.61 96.00 ' Circle Center At X - 48.0 ; Y = 197.3 and Radius, 155.3 *** 1.110 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 50.00 44.54 2 64.97 45.48 3 79.83 4 94.48 47.56 50.76 5 108.85 55.05 6 122.86 60.43 7 136.12 66.84 8 149.45 74.27 ' 9 161.88 82.66 10 173.65 01.07 1 J I Page 2 I I 1 1 1 I lJ I C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Page 3 ii 178.02 96.00 Circle Center At X = 45.0 ; Y = 242.4 and Radius, 198.0 *** 1.113 *** Failurc Surfacc Spccificd By 10 Coordinatc Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 50.00 44.54 2 64.99 44.09 3 79.95 45.29 4 94.67 46.14 5 109.00 52.60 6 122.74 58,61 7 135.74 66.09 a 147.83 74.97 9 158.87 85.12 10 168.34 96.00 Circle Center At X = 61.6 ; Y = 179.7 and Radius, 135.7 *** 1.128 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.21 44.65 3 73.86 47.88 4 88.37 51.69 5 102.71 56.09 6 116.86 61.07 7 130.80 66.61 R 144.50 72.71 9 157.94 79.36 10 171.11 86.55 li 183.97 9^..27 12 191.38 99.13 Circle Center At X = -12.9 ; Y = 407.0 and Radius, 369.5 *+* 1.139 *w* Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.39 40.74 3 74.39 41.07 4 89.26 42.99 5 103.85 46.49 6 117.98 51.52 7 131.49 58.03 8 144.23 65.95 9 156.06 75.18 10 166.83 85.62 11 175.17 96.00 Circle Center At X = 63.9 ; Y = 181.1 and Radius, 140.4 +** 1.154 *** Failurc Surfacc Spccificd By 11 Coordinatc Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 38.89 40.00 2 53.80 38.32 3 68.80 38.37 4 83.69 40.14 5 98.29 43.60 6 112.39 48.72 7 125.81 55.42 8 138.37 63.62 9 149.90 73.20 10 160.27 84.05 11 169.30 96.00 Circle Center At Y. = 60.9 ; Y = 168.6 and Radius, 130.5 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C:\stedwin\g7exampl.OUT Page 4 Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 22.22 40.00 2 37.10 38.06 3 52.09 37.63 4 67.05 38.71 5 81.82 41.31 6 96.26 45.38 7 110.21 50.89 8 123.53 57.79 9 136.09 65.99 10 147.75 75.43 11 158.10 85.99 12 166.63 96.00 Circle Center At X = 48.9 ; Y = 185.5 and Radius +++ 1.162 *** Failure Surface Specified By 13 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 22.22 40.00 2 37.10 38.05 3 52.08 37.47 4 67.06 38.25 5 81.91 40.39 6 96.50 43.88 7 110.71 48.68 8 124.42 54.76 9 137.53 62.06 10 149.91 70.53 11 161.17 80.09 12 172.11 90.66 13 176.58 96.00 147.9 Circle Center At X = 51.0 ; Y = 201.9 and Radius, 16i.i *** 1.162 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X -Surf Y -Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 44.44 42.02 2 59.41 41.00 3 74.41 41.39 4 89.30 43.18 5 103.96 46.36 6 118.25 50.90 ? 132.06 56.76 8 145.26 63.88 9 157.74 72.21 10 169.38 81.67 11 180.08 92.18 12 183.82 96.61 Circle Center At X = 62.8 ; Y = 200.3 and Radius, 159.3 *** 1.162 *** Te4.; 30�'�/-'/7/