Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
082417 PTS Agenda
'In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting[28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] MEETING AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, AUGUST 24, 2017, 6:00 P.M. • CALL TO.ORDER: Chair Person Hagel FLAG SALUTE: • Commissioner Sullivan ROLL CALL: Carter, Mann, Richardson, Sullivan, Hagel, PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow"Request to Speak" form may be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak"form may be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Action Minutes of June 22, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of June 22, 2017. 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Controls — Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux 3. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 3.1 Recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, September 28,2017,at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center,City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet(including staff reports)will he available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street, Temecula)after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Publiclfratfc Safety Commission meeting. At that time,the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website—www.citvoftemecula.org—and will he available for public viewing at the respective meeting, Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda.after the posting of the agenda will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,Temecula.8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition. such material may be accessed on the City's website—www,citvoftemecula.org—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting.please contact the Public Works Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951)694-6411. 2 LIOZ `ZZ aunt jo sajnuiyl uoipay I 'ON NIII ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 2017, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Sullivan (6 PM) FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Richardson ROLL CALL: Carter, Mann, Richardson, Sullivan, Hagel, PRESENTATIONS: Phillip Greenwood PUBLIC COMMENTS COMMISSION REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Action Minutes of May 25, 2017 — Approved staff recommendation (4-0-1) with a motion made by Commissioner Richardson and seconded by Commissioner Carter. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Carter,Mann, Richardson and Sullivan; Commissioner Hagel abstained. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of May 25, 2017. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Consideration of Neighborhood Traffic Calming Features — Calle Pina Colada — Approved staff recommendation (5-0-0)with a motion made by Commissioner Hagel and seconded by Commissioner Richardson. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Carter, Hagel, Mann, Richardson and Sullivan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: Direct staff to implement any of the following traffic calming measures during the "pilot program" period: 2.1 Installation of 3 simulated medians for traffic calming; 2.2 Right turn restrictions on Del Rey at Calle Pina Colada (initially 7-9 AM; 4-6 PM); 2.3 Left turn restrictions on Calle Pina Colada at Del Rey (initially 7-9 AM; 4-6 PM); 2.4 Expansion of the hours of restriction in either the AM, PM, or both; 2.5 Additional left or right turn timed restrictions as deemed appropriate by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer; 2.6 Direct staff to work with the neighborhood to implement these measures in a coordinated "phased" sequencing approach that will allow neighbors and staff to • observe and collect data to determine the effectiveness of each calming measure tried; 2.7 Request the Police Department assist with any needed enforcement during this"pilot program" period to ensure these measures are being adhered to; 2.8 Direct staff to come back to the P/TS Commission in six months with results of this initial "pilot program"; 2.9 Direct staff to notify the Traffic Commission with each change implemented; 2.10 Place a second V-calm sign at the discretion of the Director of Public Works/City and any other signs as needed. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT—The meeting adjourned at 7:31 PM with a motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Richardson. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, July 27, 2017,at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center,City Council Chambers,41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Bradley Sullivan Patrick Thomas Vice-Chairperson Director of Public Works/City Engineer 2 ITEM NO. 2 Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Controls — Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission pif FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer ►J DATE: August 24, 2017 SUBJECT: Item 2 Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Controls— Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux. BACKGROUND: Staff received a request from the Promenade Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association and residents to consider the feasibility of implementing a multi-way stop sign at the intersection of Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux to provide right-of-way assignment at the intersection and reduce vehicular speeds on Promenade Chardonnay Hills. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process and by mail. Promenade Chardonnay Hills is a forty-four(44)wide residential collector roadway,which provides access to the arterial roadway network between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road for numerous residential enclaves in the Chardonnay Hills subdivision. Promenade Chardonnay Hills provides one travel lane in each direction and on-street parking is permitted. The Average Daily Traffic(ADT) on Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux is approximately 1,000. The prima facie speed limit is posted at 25 MPH on Promenade Chardonnay Hills Promenade Bordeaux is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential collector roadway. which provides access to the arterial roadway network for numerous residential enclaves. Promenade Bordeaux provides one travel lane in each direction and on-street parking is permitted. Promenade Bordeaux carries approximately 500 ADT. The prima facie speed limit is posted at 25 MPH on Promenade Bordeaux. In April 2001, the Commission considered a similar request to install multi-way stop controls to reduce vehicular speeds on Promenade Chardonnay Hills at four (4) locations which included Promenade Bordeaux. The evaluation at the time found that existing volumes were lower than the applicable criteria and signs were not justified at the intersections, so the request was denied. Subsequently, the City Council overturned the Commissions decision and multi-way stop controls were installed at Chemin Clinet and Parducci Lane. two (2) locations that provide direct access to arterial roadways. In May 2017. vehicular volume data was collected at the intersection for a forty-eight (48) hour period In addition to the data collection. a review of conditions was performed. which included an evaluation of sight distance. collision history. and completion of a multi-way stop warrant analysis. An evaluation of sight distance revealed the visibility is appropriate for conditions and prevailing speeds and exceeds the minimum unobstructed sight distance of one hundred fifty-five (155)feet, which is required for the posted prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH on Promenade Chardonnay Hills. A review of the collision history for the twelve(12) month period from July 1, 2016 to June 31, 2017, indicates there were no reported collisions at the intersection. The favorable collision history can be attributed to driver familiarity with roadway conditions and exercising due care when entering and travelling through the intersection. The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets' warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at the intersection. The warrants allow for the installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal to or greater than three-hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day; and b) The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is equal to or greater than one-hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours. 2. Collision History a) Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Roadway Characteristics a) The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, b) The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs; c) The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split; and d) Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. WARRANTS 1, 2, and 3 MUST BE SATISFIED Other criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include: 4. Visibility a) The intersections sight distance is less than: • 155 feet for 25 MPH • 200 feet for 30 MPH • 250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. The multi-way stop warrant analysis performed found that existing volumes are lower than the applicable criteria and multi-way stop signs are not justified at the intersection. The Policy does however provide the flexibility to consider multi-way stop signs at locations when conditions identified under the optional criteria are satisfied. The warrant analysis indicates that multi-way stop signs are justified at the intersection based on optional criteria No's. 5-9. Staff recommends establishing multi-way stop controls at the intersection of Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with installing signs and associated pavement markings. Adequate funds are available in the Traffic Division's operating budget. ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 3 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP 4 TEMECULA r milk .iiiii . .- , - . , :it-, ./..-,,..,.i - nil•w. -to - 1• ‘ He1t7 I n %- 1 • ! : II .. , llgit—'' 4 i• .v.._ . ° T.t4 • • ''. '• —. 0 A)4arAhFi„ r.-,�. 3 fie =+ I. ` - .P," • . . Legend • ir'IN ` ��' Y " - 4.c.' i Parcels I jilt Nr . ft fi yr� ,� Highways J f - • 1 cC11 . INTERCHANGE �� ,, `>� 1 • ',`• .� INTERSTATE d ,.. - - t ] I ,�. ,� ONRAMP • • _ ' .ire,, �' Aek, r • •\ USHWY 5- Street Names w •+ r ^ ‘. © Parks P.,. •J - N./.1f4„M rt - .: ` \ 0 Schools , 'i• s A. i, ♦ Hospitals �• (1.r”` F"4. 4 v ' .. •Ata Public Facilities .� . . • _ lit le r • t ^p�rrj - lir. ••` � 4, fe., , , City of Temecula Boundary A Sphere of Influence Streets r ' ' 11 - ", .a � -` 'J • �, ib' <all other values MI. 1 t it-': . . 1, ir • t • t '- { , x �' r• .i• ‘• flare hi-d, ' , s u.'n.- COLLECTOR 1.. .'f • ,.. i 7-.,� •' • •` `\ �Tf - - T r1' 0j' �� + , � 0 4T° FREEWAY As( 1114 •'` i • • •,ti. '; 1`• i 1111, LIMITED SECONDARY ARTERIAL $1, '�• ,\, f` �- _ . .� "l t- ' - _ 1 LOCAL • IliJ ,/) • �' �L MAJOR ARTERIAL t4q, % '‘• • / J • ' .:46 ' '.,, + . , F • MODIFIED SECONDARY ARTERL «,� � r�. • �� ♦�F '�"_' � NO CLASSIFCATION ASSIGNED .-. a is.. , \ ,,,...;,;(4-7 , r' • , 1: 5,670 _14 r L �. `� Notes 945 0 0 472.52 945 0 Feet -_immo � This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be WGS_1984Web Mercator_Auxdlary_Sphere accurate current or otherwise reliable ©Latitude Geographies Group Ltd THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION ITEM NO. 3 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update AGENDA REPORT rt 40" TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission 11111**IL two imp - FROM: Patrick Thomas. Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 24, 2017 SUBJECT: Item 3 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez. Associate Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1 . Recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". BACKGROUND: The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires local authorities to review, reaffirm or adjust speed limits within their jurisdiction every seven (7) years on the basis of an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey. The CVC also mandates that new speed limits be established on the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The E&T survey provides the mechanism for the legal enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or any other electronic speed-measuring device. As defined in the California Vehicle Code, an engineering and traffic survey is ''a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities:" The survey shall include, but not be limited to. consideration of prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. accident statistics, and highway, traffic. and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. These characteristics are all considered when determining a reasonable and prudent posted speed limit. It should be noted that establishing a speed limit, which is not consistent with the 85th percentile speed, constitutes a "speed trap" and is not enforceable by the use of radar or any other electronic speed- measuring device. Willdan Engineering conducted an E&T Survey on thirty (30) arterials. which included forty (40) segments. The survey indicates that the majority of existing speed limits do not require a change, and the recommended speed limits are consistent with the existing posted speed limits. There are however,two (2) locations where an increase in the posted speed limit is being recommended. The locations are as follows: • Channel Street— Butterfield Stage Road to Chaote Street 30 MPH to 35 MPH • Royal Birkdale Drive — Temeku Drive to Meadows Parkway 25 MPH to 30 MPH A decrease to the posted speed limit is recommended at the following seven (7) locations: • Avenida Barca — Del Rey Road to Margarita Road 35 MPH to 30 MPH • Solana Way— Margarita Road to Via Norte 45 MPH to 40 MPH • Solana Way—Via Norte to Del Rey Road 45 MPH to 40 MPH • Vallejo Avenue — Santiago Road to Ynez Road 35 MPH to 25 MPH • Vallejo Avenue—Ynez Road to La Paz Street 35 MPH to 25 MPH • Vallejo Avenue — La Paz Street to Ynez Road 30 MPH to 25 MPH • Vallejo Avenue—Ynez Road to Cabrillo Avenue 30 MPH to 25 MPH During the E&T Survey analysis it was determined that conditions on Vallejo Avenue satisfied the Residential District criteria as described in the California Vehicle Code and implementation of the residential prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH is justified. Additionally, the establishment of a posted speed limit is recommended at the following four (4) locations: • El Chimisal Road — Redhawk Parkway to South City Limit 40 MPH • Pechanga Road — Pechanga Parkway to East City Limit 35 MPH • Rancho Way— Business Park Drive to Diaz Road 35 MPH • Via Las Colinas— Rancho California Road to Moraga Road 25 MPH The recommended posted speed limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the Caltrans MUTCD for establishing prudent posted speed limits that are consistent with roadway conditions, prevailing speeds, and more importantly, enforceable. Staff recommends the Commission approve a recommendation that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for installation of signs and pavement legends in the Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division's Operating Budget. Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" — Table 2 — Summary of Recommendations 2 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP 3 qi r . Vi 1!1 1111Illi `�I�`l .N }� — alo.'1 V Cl V Q L � Q1111h 1111 .....,....0. ,....-,....;„....1., _ ` } 1 "`, r F 'I �.( 'li, + __ I �i-,31-•'�'4• i '' 'f'F-! �" LTJ I Y A j j y y. �!0"�4?+ rr'' .'�t�T I _ 5(`�i ti u *�v/ ; ' 6E O� L !!.........,6,.,,,:-kin-:,,,,,..: i' "*V:4„,'. I I _ — +•' , ,. t`• • +�, F`. ..` •,>•,: FI f Ii zr, 1 ',imam h,)-L+'f,: } if•L�+"r% ,,4.: TTll •1 �^ '-• ���� - }.,. 1!><� - I ..:, .,yr. �?IT^Y -•� •,•, pGI•,'.= `+ft�N 1'I+ :.••, -m-,l y'�1?1, / ;tluaµ3;IL., f ; �r +Y r I ,'•. II L urT Y:,`:tf `'f�,j�-W• 1Y, r I.. f Ir.:Il�yl 1,‘„ -Std -4%� 's^Sti�Y"�i'"I ▪ �4`� T,,T�c'�4,' Qlrr�j , ,, s.. .�. ..,\'').(4-85i:-f.„..;e;',4.. :).1.37. ......,-40, i' 'I''�� II _ 43.:;�1j �� fi s'' -1::-7,!,,,,�,luulif �,N r+t�:± j II +�1 •5a^�' t II I,�T;_,-- .,-.1•;;-:,1.k.:7' 4 }, �• rl �• 1�ji�' I .1' k/l(y -7, 1?tiG. O�•-214 v I” 1` . r +' t.4..4-.-,,,. �C 'y.ii U r 4 1.147 Ili cn 1 I(I hi' I •s �,rc y4 r fry y �. t�? Ir :•, I IIlH „4k''''., !i( att `1 r , .gy p ;tyn� -'; ti'4 - , , - II' IIII r S�7/ /. V rt.,/ �i�-?411::'4,1"''' ''''4• _... , -L, . J .. ,{1�... �✓ �• J IQ 1 ., IGi lyp,, i. +rill ,,TsTn1 n�UX•%�s` 1 �11�uI:2) 'n- ',' {Y. � +,r Rpl -till: °1111 lil”' �� ��jfy t '•� yI--IY y�, i� 4�7'-- hc li • x�s 1l 1 F �1 r 41 , 3:I ,,,4VS;k •L_,• 4',{.:..!• ,,f^�S`- •, )(�¢,'TI—IIrJ�;p1' :�- ��• ` ` yam/@•Q� v" �• I, • �..a' '.' �'. -1k' I i' .;� . ; yt� _+' �.',,{,,•).• .4 r�i 5✓T�lil��'lk _irk 1�1- • ♦�.� �," h� :./ n .4. r, ;ir„�• . ,11,E ,: .11/d!/ 71L4N lel+�.' r \\\\' Y= ,t�,A�� y 5 •�•t-i:` 4-r . 1 � =1117f•; :� .�` 'I I!I111fI111 llUtt llll�.,7 •,,,--•••••• 1� ,4. F(7]T��� 4 .r"i, 1,`,1,',",`1`,.; llllclr ,s �l-9'1.'1-, �j 4 . i it -i'C` .i'Y 11 4 `�! =t3£i` 'y}1r f�W Ilnl �� C_ F! v-,- ,1 .Iv: 4.,4 ..- + { .�,,jj-''�` t ....:,-:-P;71 lj1,N ► 11^ I� ��'�_ � r 1 > k •� h y µ� 1r1 L ......! t4 Ctry • tri= 1,� � l � \; • �,`` 1: _�r 1 I `a_lrC�'S �) •` j[,3y7 ' S.Lµ.. . 'II - r, i--A....‘"' J " �i .Ij��" r;.l 1•.., ..,.,4 ....:.i r,,, ` ,.,.-4 .r 1 {!'r '! �.-( f.,, • is l,7` Vf'9, '7 <;:.%. ..1.,: j 4-•(II +F mN' �L.� 11■, ��� 4$111114:14:.' • il, r +.1+ y1 RC V.A.�a a 1 [ 1,r , 1 • ...‘7,---VF- ? ..: ri I _; •dayg •VII" i 'i I ,�� ff ;Y. - _ '['ii'1 �Itln 'll' .?} ''� .. s I - � �' SVS}1[�I�,'✓5 :. 4'11 1 1, { ��,111 T .NNW, •i ' f ! ■ ?'11 M*{'F ,� -41 4,,.�' �+ T1'G', '�: J. .��l . til + ,+ y g •i .y' 11.n�11 r •�;1l Iii'"�1 h -;-,(�J{• -I s- z.,T,-PR G E 6' :' :t`!:::!.f.,,N , 1,:‘.14 ''. --?'---- '•--4."--tx...ir-7.: ,„... C ' ..., \Tr' ." -'�- i" iia tt •,k,. :.1t,•''r C-:'( 'I r. r14-r l 1. f k. 4� i..1.:,.(7,,, ? �,� _ E. -'. f g,' I,I'�y.:-,,'1,:, -!-1221,---....:3,-.1.-. -- — �-- -/� �� M ,� teal 1+rJi r n Tlit `" !1!11 y .1 L,5-..71,c‘.7.... r_� )Yy- � �. lisp_�`�k a� l�flLYia �I 'r]Tr�� v. 'L, !/ —0iiii,1, —.1 Yr 1�1 �1 , N ...;,..91-7- , L- 4,- f fir•. j' y 11 �li �•' • > I'' '� tri dr.ii '' '+� n r t w ' , ,T"7` 1— 7. 1 lil�r- 3 j{7t *'vin+3` r •••:,� 1; � ..../4,„4.- + y _ r I 1 i ' " 411Pr• T ly 121- 1 E 1,___ r 4 141r' '-f�``:iiIf`t'•'r ;;•' Illiab► All ��f • :"c, .,t)'' / ' C(?,.•r e,1.-• i 5 li I •II i u 7.� fI.GLI_ i :tly' c S i r • - : 1 1 L 111 ri 4.s IIII.1 ,t 4;;�l_ 1 'F.. I 4. l' ,. •I r2T I 1 J1J'I`� li IIS `- �!Ft,: 7!:�S•'irl' 1__ S�+y�ar _ '1-:I -•r._ i -.r,11 Ir-SII—T— 7�,,,,,e!.y 1 3f i �i•� �, 7 ----�. l. I - - ,--j-. .- -_l YI� / 1 '''''.---.-)\.,1t~ i II, ■ _ �� '`�"` '^ITIrl`�5+,4wni fij f I .' <. •r ;rsl . •f r' S _ f�1�- _ 1n1 -*^Y '1 l 11 s..'''�t� ''.r ..A 1,-" rVs Yv�' .,' , te ,tom' . ' 2 • ff • (SJ3L i,, 1 y_= ` I ` ��.�Y+ i r.rte, Iris � - ,,,,,w...t �:' °S 1 I l `4�L'�t;'�D{Stl ~` R .t,. ,.•^Y , 7.., �11� • Y•: 3 Y:.�ti. ii. IP ...# \ V.. i.--,Clik,,,,1 I,.2 4'. Nit. il / <:-.4.I- - .. V,,, •- ,. .,;•.',NN,Alk...S.! • ;AV; 'f."... ,:iiira." '1-* ' .m.' •••„ L i --• p-1.-0, i• t -I r : - -:-1L-;:-:: . i-• Pi': ,2-:' --?, ', —IV- '`,1i,Dr. yl-rMI:L,ZZZ.. • 1,.'!i :','-- '• AI. . r --li ,, , i ... -1 •••:"-- . ' ' _lit: 7*.t-ri. - _- r .r4110 artlfrAgArk•i-'‘ .0.r.- \\ -1.• • . ...3Z:, , ' I 1 . : i• I 1 , ,,., .itft% 01 . ." ' •:. -, - : %-,11 1 -.1‘.• :-.,'.4 loam' "P...,10'.- " -v--.;...\- -,427, 6,.2„„..504 1 N..... kr • 4312.1., .., _ ..— '1-..- I i ".7- .g, . 1i H .- 1 .....!----m j , A'i,' 1..71,1 PV-ariA4'. ' '? ICP"7.6;•A . - .•- - , -\ ? ' ;- ?•''-'''''... \ • - rilq_4,..4'. '''' -:-. ..' D. 1 ' I f , • ...1 . i r----IT , - .. , . Tiii,7,051 , l',...:-;. _:.--._;-. --'4,,,..,, , . • , - k ',--:‘•4" .. ;i....'-,-"._-,r..-4Ti-4'' 2.:t...--e It- --r I I • 4 ,,,, _- l', 11'1 r --.:- -1, • _ ' ___ .•111 , ?C?I\ •Dk'fb. r I .' I 'Ce3A1"-% •'' , . - . ',,, Ilmia,,4."'"Z,i,.er,?•,,%,10,' 4,61°' -'• ' , -•`;:•;,AY.4,41' ', . ,:-. i .i, , - /, , ,....,•- ; ' , --0.. . - ..,. •,._.,. ..• .• • '1 (S.., . • , • 4IS '.i,V.W1 'Al'i.r ... ....V.Nt•r0..:%.- . .......-41 .. : W' \. 1 Bo. ---",- '."- m -• ‘i;&?s•s7.:--') , '''.,,v1.. 16::::,...- 001;4‘.. ii ... -.. . „........- i...s. .....- •?() kt 'S,I # . ,.,,,,.,- ) .1„Tc?.. Nii....,.., , -. - - ..;',,i'VP-'4' eL:..44-'&44,;:1/4 :- :•• .4157'.- ' •f.444:1-,'•••-4:'-', •• -, -,:.-• '--t,k'kilo."'k••:.viati. 1,1,4c.:,,,,,, r x3SZ,: ,4 ii,.,! ..- • , ":,:Z,41,:›te - '...t. -' :.; .:.,-,;.-L- ,•',45..'.:,,,. . ,,,,,,i' 4\ *:- ,,,\ ,.. 1. ''''' , 's.•:. -s. er• -. / , < , ' Z 1 ..-1/ • ." -- . .. . N. i 1111111111111,11.:, ...: • r 4••• , I'll a 4 e 4 I % , I i— •• ••-••11•40••••• • -•-•••M• . •''', 1 [ I 1 ( 'I- t EXHIBIT "B" CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 6 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Accident Posted Rec. Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% '10 mi. % in Speed No.Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit peed, Pace Pace Limit Comments 1 Amarita Way Via Rami Santiago Road 0.33 2,968 2.21 0.00 40 38 30-39 74% 40 Closest to 85th Speed 2 Amarita Way Santiago Road Pio Pico Road 0.41 2,717 2.21 0.00 40 39 28-37 62% 40 Closest to 85th Speed 1 3 Avenida Barca Del Rey Road Margarita Road 0.28 1,863 2.22 0.00 35 33 23-32 84% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 4 Cabrillo Avenue West Vallejo Road Jedediah Smith 0.89 776 2.21 1.32 30 34 25-34 90% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Road 5 Channel Street Butterfield Stage Choate Street 0.3 3,364 2.21 0.00 30 35 25-34 77% 35 Closest to 85th Speed Road 6 Country Glen Temecula Parkway Via Rio Temecula 0.19 1,184 2.21 0.00 35 36 27-36 77% 35 Closest to 85th Speed Way 7 El Chimisal Redhawk Parkway South City Limits 0.22 4,351 2.21 0.00 NP 40 29-381 62% 40 Closest to 85th Speed Road 8 Harveston Drive Harveston Way Lakeview Road 0.95 2,961 2.21 0.00 35 34 25-34 75% 35 Closest to 85th Speed 9 Harveston Drive Lakeview Road Harveston School 0.46 2,756 2.21 0.00 30 34 25-34 80% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Road 10 Harveston Drive Harveston School Township Road 0.09 3,866 2.21 0.00 25 28 21-30 93% 25 California MUTCD Option 2 Road * See "Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments ""Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles 25 mph when children are present 9 2017 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Accident Posted Rec. Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 10 mi. % in Speed No. Street From To (m1) 1 ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace Pace Limit Comments 11 Harveston Harveston Drive Margarita Road 0.09 3,618 2.21 0.00 25 28 22-31 95% 25 California MUTCD Option 2 School Road 12 Harveston Way Village Road Margarita Road 10.14 7,303 2.21 0.00 35 37 29-38 87% 35 Closest to 85th Speed 13 Jedediah Smith Ynez Road/ De Temecula 0.15 10,678 2.21 0.00 35 36 26-35 69% 35 Closest to 85th Speed Road Portola Road Parkway 14 La Paz Street Ynez Road Temecula 0.27 9,635 2.21 0.70 35 37 28-37 79% 35 Closest to 85th Speed Parkway 15 Lakeview Road Date Street Harveston Drive 0.1 7,700 2.04 0.00 30 34 27-36 92% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 16 Mira Loma Rancho Vista Road Calle Violetta 0.22 1,267 2.21 3.28 25 27 20-29 100% 25 Closest to 85th Speed Drive West 17 Montelegro Way Pio Pico Road McCabe Drive 0.72 3,718 2.21 0.34 40 40 32-41 88% 40 Closest to 85th Speed 18 North General Margarita Road Calle Pina Colada 0.55 8,125 2.04 0.00 40** 43 32-41 75% 40** California MUTCD Option 2 Kearny Road 19 Pechanga Road Pechanga Parkway East City Limit 0.3 4,805 2.21 0.00 NP** 37 26-35 57% 35** Closest to 85th Speed 20 Pio Pico Road Amarita Way! Margarita Road 0.24 4,567 2.21 0.00 35** 38 28-37 80% 35 ** California MUTCD Option 2 Montelegro Way ' See"Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments '**Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles **25 mph when children are present 10 2017 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Accident Posted Rec. Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 110 mi. % in Speed No.Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit peed Pace Pace Limit Comments 21 Pio Pico Road Margarita Road De Portola Road 0.38 1,827 2.21 1 0.00 30 36 28-37 76% 30 * 22 Preece Lane Ynez Road North Ynez Road South 0.5 930 2.21 0.00 30 33 24-33 75% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 , I 23 Pujol Street First Street Southerly 0.28 3,098 2.21 0.00 30 32 24-33 78% 30 Closest to 85th Speed Terminus i 24 Rancho Way Business Park Diaz Road 0.24 5,243 2.21 0.00 NP 39 28-37 60% 35 California MUTCD Option 2 Drive 25 Royal Birkdale Temeku Drive Meadows 0.34 2,083 2.21 0.00 25 33 23-32 82% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Drive Parkway 26 Royal Crest Butterfield Stage Crowne Hill Drive 0.36 2,397 2.21 0.00 35 38 29-38 80% 35 California MUTCD Option 2 Place Road 27 Solana Way Ynez Road Margarita Road 0.3 16,823 2.22 0.00 40 43 35-44 76% 40 California MUTCD Option 2 28 Solana Way Margarita Road Via Norte 0.53 8,165 1.29 0.00 45 44 35-44 ' 74% 40 California MUTCD Option 2 29 Solana Way Via Norte Del Rey Road 0.54 2,724 1.29 0.00 45 42 33-42 73% 40 Closest to 85th Speed 30 Township Road Village Road Harveston Drive 0.06 1,726 2.21 0.00 25 25 18-27 99% 25 Closest to 85th Speed * See"Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments *"Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles "25 mph when children are present 11 2017 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Accident Posted Rec. Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% ;10 mi. % in Speed No.Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace 1Pace Limit Comments 31 Vallejo Avenue Santiago Road Ynez Road 0.32 405 2.21 0.00 35 % 25 32 Vallejo Avenue Ynez Road La Paz Street 0.73 737 2.21 0.00 35** % 25** 33 Vallejo Avenue La Paz Street Ynez Road 0.65 330 2.21 0.00 30 % 25 34 Vallejo Avenue Ynez Road Cabrillo Avenue 0.2 45 2.21 0.00 30 % 25 35 Via Las Colinas Rancho California Moraga Road 0.23 2,659 2.21 0.00 NP 29 20-29 89% 25 California MUTCD Option 2 Road 36 Via Montezuma Jefferson Avenue Del Rio Road 0.17 3,250 2.21 0.00 30 32 20-29 69% 30 Closest to 85th Speed 37 Via Rio Avenida De Country Glen Way 0.36 3,225 2.04 0.00 40 44 36-45 66% 40 California MUTCD Option 2 Temecula Missions 38 Via Rio Country Glen Way Redhawk Parkway 0.27 9,489 2.04 0.00 40 44 35-44 61% 40 California MUTCD Option 2 Temecula 39 Village Road Township Drive Harveston Way 0.17 5,557 2.21 0.00 25 30 21-30 77% 25 * 40 Wallaby Way Seagull Way Wolf Valley Road 0.21 1,954 2.21 0.00 30 33 23-32 71% 30 California MUTCD Option 2 See"Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments "'Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles "25 mph when children are present 12 2017 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula TRAFFIC ENGINEER' S REPORT ail I f ti!F • U" 1989 MEMORANDUM 1�M TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent— PW Streets DATE: July 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for June, 2017 CC: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer— Land Development Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of June, 2017 The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by both in house crews and maintenance contractors. Attachments: Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division Street Maintenance Detail Report Contracted Maintenance Work Completed Graffiti Removal Chart MEMORANDUM TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell,Maintenance Superintendent r't �I•A� t,t DATE: July t,2017 1989 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report June, 2017 The following activities were performed by Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of June,2017: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 45 B. Total signs installed 14 C. Total signs repaired 43 D. Banners Replaced 15S II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 27 ❑l. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 2 739 B. Total Tons 38 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 52 B. Down Spouts 0 C. Under sidewalks 0 D. Bowls 0 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 41 B. Total S.F. 543 VII. STENCILING A. 993 New and Repainted Legends B. 19,970 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 95 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic E. 37 RPMs Installed R-WAIN!AIN6NUACrRPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 55 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures,litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 60 service order requests for the month of May, 2017. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 74 hours of overtime which includes standby time,special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors For the month of June,2017 was $97,618.00 compared to $ 39,066.00 for the month of May, 2017. • Account No. 5402 $ 42,118.00 Account No. 5401 $ 55,500.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ Electronic Copies: Patrick Thomas, City Engineer - Director of Public Works Amer Attar, Principal Engineer • Capital Improvements Mayra De La Torre,Senior Engineer - Land Development Jerry Gonzalez,Associate Engineer • Traffic Division R:WIAINLMNINOACIRP I' DEPARTMENT OF PUBt IC WORKS Uale Submmed July 1 2011 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT Submitted By Patrick Thomas STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION Prepared By Rodney Idwel FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 ITN QUARTER Apr-17 Slay-17 Jun-17 FISCAL YEAR TO DATE WORK 1• WORK WORK WORK TOTAL COST SCOPE OF WORK Unk Cost COMPLETED i COST COMPLETED COST COMPLETED COST I COMPLETED COST FOR LAST FISCAL YEAR ASPHALT CONCRETE. i Square Foulage 52 97 3.823 I$ 11.364.31 1,184 1$ 3,516.48 2,739 i$ 8,134.83 46.157 $ 58,283.28 $ 58,090 23 Tons 20 25 38 232 Parking Lot Slurry Seal Square Footage Gallons PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE: Square Footage $2 97 0 $ • 0 $ • 0 LS • 0 $ S PCC Yards 0 0 0 0 i _ STRIPING 6 PAVEMENT MARKINGS; Red curb&Striping iknear feet) 50 07 18 612 $ 1,302.84 32,306 S 2,211.42 19.970 $ 1,397.90 90.136 $ 6.309 52 $ 218 40 New B Repanted Legends(each) 5800 22 $ 176.00 133 S 1,064.00 993 $ 7,944.00 2.843 $ 22,744.00 $ 18.13600 Bull Noses(each) $0 07 0 $ 0 $ 95 $ 6.66 433 6 30.31 $ Raised Pavement Markers-RPM's(each) 0 18 37 225 Thermo Plastic Luer nds LN1 0 0 0 0 ,• SIGNS&BANNERS No of Signs REPLACED 526 39 33 $ 870.87 24 S 633.36 45 i$ 1.187 55 668 S 17.628 52 1 22,537 06 Malen6(cost per sign' 550 00 $ 1,660.00 S 1,200.00 $ 2.250 00 9 33,400 00 $ 42,700 00 No of Signs INSTALLED 126 39 9 6 237.51 11 S 290.29 14 1$ 369 46 179 5 4,72381 3 5.225 22 Material(cost per sign) $50 00 $ 450.00 $ 650.00 $ 700.00 5 8.950.00 $ 9,900 00 No of Signs REPAIRED 528 39 38 $ 1,002.82 59 $ 1,567.01 43 $ 1,134.77 341 $ 8,998.99 $ 18,077 15 Malenal(cost per sign' $50 OD $ 1,900.00 $ 2,960.00 $ 2,150.00 S 17,050.00 $ 34,250 00 No of BANNERS installed 526 39 0 $ • 1 $ 26.39 158 $ 4,169.62 741 S 19.554 99 $ 20,452 25 Cnnstmas Wreaths installed 926 39 0 S $ - GRAFFITI REMOVAL T— -- No of Locations 33 ! 40 41 0 775 Squire Footage 2,191 1.931 543i I 0 30589 DRAINAGE FACILITES CLEANED Catch Basins 526 39 29 $ 766.31 125 5 3,298.75 52 $ 1,372.28 973 .S 25,677.47 $ 23.249 59 Down Drains $26 39 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ - 25 $ 669.75 $ 1.820 91 Under sidewalk Drains 526 39 0 $ 0 $ - 0 $ • 287 $ 7,046.13 $ 11.928 28 Detention Basins 526 39 0 $ - 0 $ • 0 6 • 12 ' $ 318.5$ $ 1,530.62 Bridge Deck Grains $26 39 0 i 1j • TREES TRIMMED ] No.of Tress Tnmmed S25 !39, 10 I$ 263.90 54 i$ 1,426,06 27 S 712.63 I 261 S 6,587.79 $ 16,200.46 R.O.W.WEED ABATEMENT i 1 Area Abeted(square feel) $0.034 550 1$ 16.70 8.680 i$ 227.12. 0 --5 13,835 5 470.39 $ 432.68 The Sheat Maintenance Division also responds to service requests fora variety of other Means,We tidal Humber of Service Order Requests,some of which Include work reported above Is reported monthly. SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS No of sort's — 55 I 60 55 _ 996 743 • Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division are on-c.I t and respond to eller hours emergencies Cr support City sponsored special events •• • Overtime Hours $35 5' 89 1$ 3,523.51 49 $ 1,939.91 74 1 2,129.114 1,585 i$ 62,730.36 9 48.814.47 1 TOTALS:1 28,111 I$ 23,611.71 42,700 $ 20.306.43 24,924 $ 34,458.26 I 169.909 1$ 301,461.98 $ 333,566 32 R'MAIN IAINIMOACRPT\AILY AUG SEPI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted July 1.2017 CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED Submitted By Patrick Thomas FISCAL YEAR 2016 - 2017 Prepared By Rodney Tidwell SCOPE OF WORK JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Year to Date ASPHALT CONCRETE 00 0 0 0 0 0 ----.__— �—___.—,----- - --•----------•-------- Cost $ • $ i - $ 84,671.05 $ - $ • $ 84,671.05 ANNUAL SPRAYS Annual Spraying of Post Herbicides Cost $ 17,975.00 $ - $ •- $ - $ 17,675.00 $ 27,950.00 i 93,516.00 . .-...--- -_---- - _--------_—___r_— -- ---- - - —-- i-- _ DRAINAGE FACILITIES Channels(each) 0 0 — 0 _ 0 0 0 Cost $ 40,000.00 $ - 3 - $ - $ - $ 55,600.00 $ 96,600.00 STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Striping(linear feet) _---.....9-•- •--•------o---------------------o- - 0 --- -_0 0 0 _ Sandblasting(linear feet) 0 _ 0 __ 0 - 0 0 0 0 ._._— Legends(each) 0_ _ 0 0 _-- 0 0 ___ 0` 0 __ Cost $ _ $ - $ • $ 138,533.32 $ - $ - $ 134,533.32 TREES Trees Trimmed 0 0 0 0 0 27 27 Trees/Stumps Removed ___— 00 0 0 0 0 0 Tree Planting --�— .__._.__.0 Cost S 1.320.00 $ 20,629.00 $ 14,974.00 $ 3,399.00 $ 12,741.00 $ 11,168.00 $ 119,431.00 WEED ABATEMENT ROW Area Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Other Public Lands Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Cost $ • $ - $ _ $ - $ 5,675.00 $ $ 8,565.00 MISC.MAINT ACTIVITES Misc cleanup(mowing/debris/sand/etc) Cost i • $ 40,000.00 $ $ - $ —2,975`00 •$ = 101,380.00 Pre-emergent spraying Cost $ - _$ 2,010.00 S 18,838.50 $ $ - : - 3 20,845.50 Install 1/4 ton rip rap Cost $ - $ - $ 13,000.00 $ • $ - $ - $ 13,000.00 Repair Roadway Cost $ - $ - $ _______S____________ •-_$ •�____ $ $ . Sandbags Cost $ - -$ ----- 3 --$ -_M. $..-._- .3 — Misc concrete work Cost 3 - $ - $ • $ $ - 3 - 3 - Channel cleanout(Homeless/Debris/etc) Cost $_____-__ —$ 2,690.00 $ $ - $ • $ 3,000.00 3 5,690.00 — ----) --- —__ TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS $ 59,295.00 -$ 65,129.00 $ 46,812.60 $ 226,603.37 $ 39,066.00 5 97,618.00_$ 6$1`33.87 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of June,2017 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK CONTRACTOR; Rene's Commercial Management Date: 05-29-17 Post-Emergent Spraying for Open Right-of-Ways Citywide # 11-17 - TOTAL COST SI 3,975.00 Date: 06-05-17 Homeless Camp Clean Up Citywide # 13.17 TOTAL COST $3,000.00 Date: 06-12-17 Post Emergent Spraying for Major Arterials Citywide # 12-17 TOTAL COST $13,975.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Miko Mountain Lion, Inc. Date: 06-06-17 Removal of Sand,Silt and Debris from Channel Empire Creek # 1118 TOTAL COST 511,500.00 Date: 06-I9-17 Removal of Sand. Silt and Debris from Channel Long Canyon # 1119 TOTAL COST $44,000.00 CONTRACTOR: West Coast Arborists, Inc. Date: 05-31-17 Annual Right-ol'-Way tree Trimmings Citywide # 126504 TOTAL COST Si 1,168.00 Date: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $55,500.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $42,118.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 R:MAINTAINiMOM'TRPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL FISCAL YEAR 2016 - 2017 Number Square 10,000 100 Month of Calls Footage 9,000 90 Jul 53 2,424 8,000 — -- 80 Aug 89 3,504 Sep 37 865 7,000 70 Oct 38 1,217 a, 6,000 - - 60 m A Nov 19 1,261 a5,000 - — - — 50 6 m Dec 31 1,436 i 4,000 — — — 40 2 Jan 52 2,389 3,000 — -- — — 30 Feb 52 1,468 Mar 65 8,758 2,000 — — 20 IIII Apr 33 2,191 1,000 I - 10 mg May 40 1,931 0 - I 0 Jun 413 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals 550 27,987 w Square ■Number Footage of Calls 7171 r r ,rF 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Thomas, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent— PW Streets DATE: August 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for July, 2017 CC: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer— Land Development Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer—Traffic Maria Hilton, Sr. Office Specialist— Traffic Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of July. 2017 The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by both in house crews and maintenance contractors. Attachments: Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division Street Maintenance Contractors Detail Report Contracted Maintenance Work Completed Graffiti Removal Chart MEMORANDUM Olv'I'F;d1p. TO: Patrick Thomas,Director of Public Works -74, A 'ter , FROM: Rodney Tidwell,Maintenance Superintendent �► x DATE: August 1,2017 1989 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report—July,2017 The following activities were performed by the Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of July,2017: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 51 B. Total signs installed 4 C. Total signs repaired 24 D. Banners Replaced 0 IL TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 50 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A.C. repairs 886 B. Total Tons 6 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 85 B. Down Spouts 0 C. Under sidewalks 0 D. Bowls 0 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 45 B. Total S.F. 4 701 VII. STENCILING A. 150 New and Repainted Legends B. 12,215 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 0 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic E. 36 RPMs Installed It MAIN GIN\MOACI'RP Also,City Maintenance statfresponded to 100 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,tree trimming,sign repair, A.C.failures,litter removal,and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 60 service order requests for the month of June, 2017. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 210 hours of overtime which includes standby time,special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of July,2017 was$31,758 compared to $97,618 For the month of June,2017. Account No. 5402 $14,858 Account No. 5401 516,900 Account No. 999-5402 5 Electronic Copies: Pat Thomas, City Engineer - Director of Public Works Amer Attar, Principal Engineer - Capital Improvements Mayra De La Torre,Senior Engineer - Land Development Jerry Gonzalez,Associate Engineer - Traffic Division • Maria Hilton, Sr. Office Specialist - Traffic Division R.\MAINTAIMMOACTRYI' STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of July, 2017 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREEC/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR West Coast Arborist,Inc. Datc:6/30 City Wide Annual ROW Tree Trimming # 127265 TOTAL COST 58,170.00 Date:7/I S City Wide Annual ROW Tree Trimming #127721 TOTAL COST 56,688.00 • Date TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR; Mika Mountain Lion,Inc. Kemove Sand,silt and misc.debris Irom channel Date: b,'2 2 Vallejo Channel # 1127 TOTAL COST 516,400.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR; Date: TOTAL COST Date: 4 TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $16,900 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $14,858 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 R•MAINTAINkMOACTRPT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted August 1, 2017 CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED Submitted By: Patrick Thomas FISCAL YEAR 2017 - 2018 Prepared By Rodney Tidwell SCOPE OF WORK JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Year to Dab ASPHALT CONCRETE Square Footage 886 0 0 0 0 0 886 Cost f - f $ - f - $ - f f T.-......,. ,r,r-. .. r_ _—_._,................................... .. _.,•-_---------------------+ ANNUAL SPRAYS Annual Spraying of Pre/Post Herbicides S • $ $ • $ - $ $ • $ DRAINAGE FACILITIES Channels(each) _ 0 __ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cost f - f - �_ $ - ff i $ - - - - - ._ Y.- --.�- __--_-_.., STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Striping(linear Leet) 12215 0 0 0 0 0 12 215 Sandblasting(linear feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Legends(each) 150 0 -- 0 - – 0 0 0 150._. —,---- r Cost f - $ - $ - f f - $ - TREES Trees Trimmed 50 0 0 D ___---—__ 0 50 Trees Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cost $ 14,858.00 $ - $ - $ • f - $ - 14,858.00 WEED ABATEMENT ROW Area Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 Other Public Lands Abated(Square Feet) 0 —�--- 0 0 0 0 r.._ 0 0 ._ Cost f - f - f f f - f MISC.MAINT ACTIVITES Misc Cleanup(mowing/debris/etc) Cost $ - f Install 10 LF of 18"CMP Cost $ - f Fix Guardrail Cost Ls - f Repair Roadway Cost _ ! ; –__— Sandbags Cost - - Misc concrete work Cost f - f Channel cleanout/Spraying Cost $ 16.900,00 f - oo TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS $ 31,758.00 $ R MAAINTAIN+MOACRTPUULY THRU DEC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Subm lted August 1,2017 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT Submitted By Patrick Thomas STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION Prepared By Rodney Tidwell FISCAL YEAR 2017.2018 1ST QUARTER Jrul•17 Awt 17 17 j FISCAL YEAR TO DATE SCOPE OF WORK mit Cas WORK 1 COST WORK COST WORK COSTWORK COST TOTAL COST FOR COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED LAST FISCAL YEAR ASPHALT CONCRETE. Square Footage. 5297 886 $ 2,831.42 : $ 0 f • 886 !$ 2,631.42 $ 58,00023 Tons 6 0 6 Parking.ul 5Wrry Seal Square Footage Gallons PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE Square Footage 82 97 0 :5 • u f • 0 I$ S - $ PCC Yards 0 1 0 i u STRIPING I PAVEMENT MARKINGS: I, Red curb&Slnpu,g(linear feel). 50.07 12.215 .$ 855 05 0f$ • 0 $ - 12,215 i$ 666.05 $ 218 40 New 8 Repainted Legends(each) $8.00 150 $ 1,200.00 0 I S 0 $ • 150 18 1,200.60 0 18.13600 Buil Noses(each) 50.07 0 $ o i$ • 0 $ • 0 •$ Raised Pauemenl Markers-RPM's(each) 36 0 I 0 38 36 Thermo Plastic Legends(each) O 00 0 ' 0 f 0 SIGNS&BANNERS - I I L No of Signs REPLACED $2839 51 $ 1,346.89 0 ' $ • 0 $ • 51 $ 1,345.89 $ 22,53708 Material(cost per swgn) 55000 '$ 2,550.00 S • $ - $ 2,550 00 $ 42,700.00 No of Signs INSTALLED 526 39 4 $ 105.56 0 S • 0 $ - 4 $ 105 56 $ 5,22522 Material(Cost per sign) 55000 3 200.00 f • $ - $ 200 00 $ 9,900.00 No d1 Signs REPAIRED $2639 24 $ 633.36 f • 0 $ • 24 I$ 633 36 5 18,077 15 ri Mateal(cosi per sign) $5000 ,$ 1,200.00 $ • $ I$ 1,200 00 $ 34,250.00 No of BANNERS nslalleo 526 39 0 $ - f - 0 $ - 0 I$ - $ 20,45225 Christmas Wreaths Instated price i$ . ' 0 i $ • 0 ,$ • 0 1$ $ — GRAFFITI REMOVAL No 01LocaTuns 45 0 0 45 775 Square Footage 4.701 0 0 4,701 30609 DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANED 1 Catch Basins 526.39 85 5 2,243.16 0 $ • 0 $ • 55 .$ 2,243.15 $ 23249.69 Down Drains 825.30 0 $ 0 $ • 0 $ • 0 $ 5 1,820.91 Under sidewalk Drains 528.39 0 $ 0 $ a I$ • 0 $ - $ 11,92828 Detention Basun- 126.39 0 $ 0 $ • 0 I$ • 0 $ - 5 1,530.62 Bridge neck Drains $26.39 0 $ • 0 $ • 0 I$ • 0 ii TREES TRIMMED i I j No of Trees Trimmed 52639 50 ;S. 1,319.50 0 1$ - 0j$ - 50 !$ 1,319.50 $ 16,203.46 R.O.W.WEED ABATEMENT ' Area Abated(square feet} 50034 0 $ - 0 ,5 , u '5 • U :$ 5 432.80 The Street limineenance Division also responds to mimics requests,the 101M number of Service Order Requests,some of which include work reported above M rd reported moodily. SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS No of SOR's 1 100 f I 0 I I 0 100 743 Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division an or1.Cell and respond to after hours emergencies or support City sponsored special events :_wenunr Hours 539.59 210 $ 6,313.90 i $ - . $ 210 $ 8,313 90 8 48,514.47 TOTALS: 16,893 1-$ 22,097.03 0 I$ - 0 {5 — 16.693 `$ 22,897.83 8 333,588.32 F WIAINTAJNWOACRPTUULY AUG SEPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL FISCAL YEAR 2017 - 2018 Number Square 5,000 50 Month I of Calls I Footage 4,500 • 45 Jul 45 4,701 4,000 , 40 Aug Sep 3.500 35 Oct 3,000 • 30 _ 3 Nov d 2,500 • 25 Dec 4i 2,000 20 Z Jan 1,500 15 Feb 1,000 10 Mar Apr 500 May 0 0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals 45 4,701 •Square •Number Footage of Calls POLICE CHIEF ' S REPORT RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TEMECULA POLICE CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT • 3o7w:. Lc^RQG'• ML'IIRrf S.fA a?SE'. To: Southwest Station Admin From: Marianna Kuhn. Crime analyst Date: July 3. 2017 Re: Temecula Police Department— Part 1 Calls for Service June 1—30, 2017 Total Part 1 calls for service: 268. An 18%decrease from the previous month (327). Temecula Police Department Part 1 Calls for Service 150 100 50 0 ■ ■ Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Rape Robbery Vehicle Theft •Total 28 14 193 3 2 28 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category This information includes vehicle burg!anes rn that category Non-written incidents: 57 Written incidents: 211 Total calls for service: 268 v, t s c:,. Data provided by RSO!!Data Warehouse Laws Enforcement Use City of Temecula Traffic Statistics June 2017 Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 977 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 526 Parking Citations 146 Total Citations 1649 Citation Breakdown S.L.A.P. 169 N.E.T. Citations Unable to quantify until new tablets are deployed School Zones Summer Break Seatbelt Citations 50 - Community Presentations 1 Non-Injury 20 Hit and Run 4 Injury 17 Fatal 0 Total 41 Pedestrian Related Collisions: 3 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report. D.U.L Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 18 Total cell phone cites 227 (23123 & 23124 CVC) Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/Click it or Ticket Operations/Special Operations City-Wide red light enforcement (S.L.A.P.) State-Wide Motorcycle Primary Collision Factor Enforcement OTS Funded DUI Checkpoint Prepared by Corporal B. De Loss#2914 July 5,2017 Commission Members July 5,2017 City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities/Events Dear Commission Members: Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of June, 2017. These activities include the following: • Citation statistics(attachment) • Part 1 Crimes(attachment) • Community Action Patrol supported call-outs: None for June • CAP Meetings: Regular CAP meeting was held. • Community Action Patrol activity/patrol hours: 723 hours for June,2017. Year-to-date total: 3,947 hours. *There were 22 CAP patrols with 33 members participating. • Training: None for June • Special Events: June 24th: DUI Checkpoint,S CAP members assisted If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department,Traffic Division—(951)696-3072. Sincerely, Corporal Bryan De Loss Temecula Police Department—Traffic Division RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TEMECULA POLICE CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT S4*RIFF STAN STUFF 30755,-A M2O ROAD, Mitagint0.CA 9563 To: Southwest Station Admin From Marianna Kuhn. Crime Analyst Date: August 2. 2017 Re: Temecula Police Department—Part 1 Calls for Service July 1 — 31,2017 Total Part 1 calls for service: 243. A 9%decrease from the previous month (268). _emecula Police Department Part 1 Calls for Service 180 160 140 :20 :00 80 Aggravated AiSdult Burglary Larceny Theft Rape Robbery veh Theft • f-n.! 2 7 32 155 4 23 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category.This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category Non-written incidents: 50 Written incidents: 193 Total calls for service: 243 Not for Public Drsmbubon Data prowdea by RSO/Data warehouse Law Enforcement Use City of Temecula Traffic Statistics July 2017 Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 712 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 464 Parking Citations 167 Total Citations 1343 Citation Breakdown S.L.A.P. 85 N.E.T. Citations Unable to quantify until new tablets are deployed School Zones Summer Break Seatbelt Citations 25 Community Presentations 0 Traffic Collisions Non-Injury 19 Hit and Run 7 Injury 10 Fatal 0 Total 36 Pedestrian Related Collisions: 1 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting In a written Police report. D.U.I. Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 9 Total cell phone cites 215 (23123 & 23124 CVC) Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/Click it or Ticket Operations/Special Operations City-Wide red light enforcement (S.L.A.P.) State-Wide Motorcycle Primary Collision Factor Enforcement (OTS Grant) Prepared by Corporal B. De Loss#2914 August 3, 2017 Commission Members August 3, 2017 City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities/Events Dear Commission Members: Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of July, 2017. These activities include the following: • Citation statistics(attachment) • Part 1 Crimes(attachment) • Community Action Patrol supported call-outs: July 10th—House Fire,two members. • CAP Meetings: Regular CAP meeting was held. • Community Action Patrol activity/patrol hours: 658 hours for July, 2017. Year-to-date total: 4,605 hours. *There were 24 CAP patrols with 38 members participating. • Training: None for July. • Special Events: July 4th—Old Town Parade,7 members participated. July 15th—Anti-Trump Rally,2 members participated. If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department,Traffic Division—(951)696-3072. Sincerely, Corporal Bryan De Loss Temecula Police Department—Traffic Division FIRE CHIEF ' S REPORT Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics �Qpris t‹. r ire rkpjk�►or `u CAL FIRE SINGE 1885 MEI .vemiewt ..c .1 .11 R. Hawkins Fire Chief 7/6/2017 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion,Station,Jurisdiction Page 1 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for an units only the first unit in Response Activity ■Can Fre 2 03% ■Faits Alarm 63 9 0% •Fiat 14x1 6 0 9% ■Ilam 500 72.9% •98.613-Fam Urang Fa* 1 0 1% Orlar Firt 5 0.7% ■091ar WE2 0 3% ■Pubic Sa as Ata 27 3.9% ■Rat Fri 1 0.1% •Room Minn 1 0.1% ■Strlrn5 15 2 2% Traffic Culiaion 61 8 9% Vehicle.Fn 1 01% a vtiltmnd Fre 2 0 3% Tool 098 1000% Corn Fire 2 False Alarm 62 Haz Mat 6 Medical 500 Mufti-Fam Dwelling Fire 1 Other Fire 5 Other Misc 2 Public Service Assist 27 Res Fire 1 Ringing Alarm 1 Standby 15 Traffic Collision 61 Vehicle Fire 1 Wildiand Fire 2 Incident Total: 686 Average Enroute to Onscene Time• Fnroute true=When a unit has been atlunowledged as responding.Onscene time=When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene.Fstr.nv ttlhet stausuc 111115lde E.uroulQ[sl(Assent lease wntas:Lllte II tlelo Desk.at 951-94U-139011 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 464 160 14 4 4.2 72.3% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average lime HZM.HZMMC,OAC,OAF.OAM.OAMAD.OAMAI.OAM I E OAMVA,OAP,OAR,OAV,OUT.OOU. LtB,LEO,LEI,BRNPMT,OES.PAA.PAD,PAF,PAO,PAP,HFS,HF SAM,HFSCA.HSBT.HSBTC,HSBTS.HSBTV.HSE.HSG Last Updated 7/5/2017 2` Page 2 of 6 'Indents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for al units only the first unit in Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction Corn False iiaz Mat Medical Mufti-Fa Other Other Public Res Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle WildIan Toted Fire Alarm m Fire Mist Service Fire Alarm Collhio Fire d Fire 010110211 18 12 i ernecuia 0 20 2 11C 1 1 0 5 0 0 2 24 0 1 166 aal.culo Station Total 0_ 20 2 110 1 1 0 5 0 0 2 24 0 1 166 T3 Rancho Temecula 2 15 1 146 0 1 1 9 0 0 3 16 0 0 194 - l ofN. Station Total 2 15 1 146 0 1 1 9 0 0 3 16 0 0 194 lion 53 French I ir,r;,dn 0 i:) 0 5 0 1 0 0 U 0 1 0 0 0 7 alley Station Total 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 -•tion 54 Tem.:,:,,/:, 0 8 3 152 0 2 C 7 1 0 7 12 1 0 193 rmmaw Station Toni 0 8 3 152 0 2 0 7 1 0 7 12 1 0 193 tion 92 Wolf Ierr.sIlia U 19 U 87 0 0 1 6 0 1 2 9 0 1 126 station Total 0 19 0 87 0 0 1 8 0 1 2 9 0 1 126 +,rr.lir•, 'r•rai 2 62 6 500 1 5 2 27 1 1 15 61 1 2 606 h2 h •:c 1 .,, 2 2 7 1 1 15 61 1 _ 666 Last Updated 7/512017 2`f Page 3 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response limes for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Jurisdiction Cam Fin False Nay Mat Medical Multi-Fa Other Other Public Res Fin Ringing Standby Tnfnc Vehiclo Wtldland Total Alarm m Firs lilac Ssrvlca Alarm Collision Fin Fin amecula 2 62 6 500 1 5 2 27 1 1 15 61 1 2 686 Grand Total 2 62 6 500 1 5 2 27 1 1 15 61 1 2 686 Last Updated 7/5/2017 2'`_ Page 4 of 6 'incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit iri. Incidents by Supervisorial District- Summary DISTRICT 3 Grand CHUCK Total • - . .. B.. Corn Fire 2 2 False Alarm 62 62 Haz Mat 6 6 Medical — 500 500 Mufti-Fam Dwelling Fire 1 1 Other Fire 5 5 Other Misc 2 2 Public Service Assist 27 27 Res Fire 1 1 Ringing Alarm 1 1 Standby 15 15 Traffic Collision 61 61 Vehicle Fire 1 1 Wildland Fire 2 2 Total Last Updates 7i5/2017 2` Page 5 of 6 incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. MONT1 I - 6 and YEAR - 2017 and CITYNAMC - 'Temecula' - j .-. .� • �,...... ' •n.►r6 lie r 1, f', ` 111.. a- •i`G` • F • ..•-^ \. 114 r • w *ea.'- jr iii V y440 V ,,,_ .:•.,, is, . ..,- ,,,, • • ti ..„--, Pi .- .-44‘: . her l• As .�• •i , , e !,,,,, , ..- , 1,4„teipettote . 0 . 3 - -,-.-t_..... , 74, , ;J ae,h.ya, •Li .t1 1 r)f. ,•.1 1 1�i' I I 1 . c'41 1,A,1 : „.... ..0firciff _ ,_ ..,„. • ..- c 'yeti - iI ,. i'4 ,°414 �4 T ,• .!! _L.__ ^--r--- Legend h • moi. u Sen«MS Q Riyeis e Couty6. F,.Strawi .,, gi Idn-_Mot •� Pudc S arbor Assists 14•7„e Rasorvanicrts it Casinos Fivers it County f ire GIS MEdlall est updated 7;5/2017 2° Page 6 of 6 'Incidents are Shown based on the primary response area for the incident location This does not represent total response times for all units only the lust unit in 2017 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2017 Class Totals Ian Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CPR/AED 19 6 11 24 129 64 253 FIRST AID 16 10 0 60 47 4 137 PEDIATRIC FIRST AID o 0 0 0 r 0 o o HCP u 0 0 0 3 03 STAFF HCP o 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERT 1 0 0 0 28 0 29 TEEN CERT 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 Total 36 16 11 112 207 68 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 450 INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2017 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 1 1 0 0 24 FALSE ALARM Mi 5t. 51 7"i 57 62 ; 367 HAZ MAT 4 3 6 3 3 6 25 MEDICAL AID "+ 513 566 486 525 500 3119 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 2 0 2 1 1 _ 6 OTHER FIRE 4 2 8 5 S 29 OTHER MISC, 4 3 2 2 5 2 _ _ _ I 18 PSA 42 :1544 39 34i 221 RINGING ALARM _ 1 0 _ 1 , 3 0 1 + _ 6 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2 1 2 ? 4 I 12 RESCUE 1 1 1 1 0 04 STANDBY 14 9 8 12 11 15 69 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 69 77 83 71 79 61 440 VEHICLE FIRE _ _ 1 1 3 1 5 1 12 WILDLAND FIRE 1 1 1 3 2 2 10 Total 741 707 771 706 731 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 4342 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 600 i58 /00 600 500 400 300 207 200 jlb 117 114 o`, 100 71 " 5 �g " $2 36 16 16 ; i U J E 4. O ao •2016 YTD ❑2017 YTD MONTH 2016 YID 2017 YTD JANUARY 30 36 FEBRUARY 16 16 MARCH 71 11 APRIL 55 112 MAY 65 207 JUNE 49 68 IULY 176 AUGUST 114 SEPTEMBER 95 OCTOBER 52 NOVEMBER 35 DECEMBER 0 TOTAL TO DATE 758 450 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 9000 - - - - - —- - ---- 8000 7000 - --- 6000 _ 5000 4000 li 4 ■2016 YTD 3000 02017 YTD 2000 1000 `�_ y n r_ L l 0 PQ, PQA ��'` �� i �� 5� tiQ �Q ,0R. 4, 14. 1P�J <�°�J `rP PQM tr°' l �J AJC., `fir ,�o� a��0 `qtr oe. oO 1 MONTH 2016 YTD _ 2017 YTD JANUARY 693 741 FEBRUARY 675 675 MARCH 621 771 APRIL 681 706 MAY 702 711 JUNE 7(Y' 686 JULY 708 AUGUST o99 SEPTEMBER 751 OCTOBER 744 NOVEMBER 76o DECEMBER 829 TOTAL TO DATE 8571 4310 ' ANL c„,„,........., fri Fire Department Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: June Reporting Year: 2017 Reporting 12, 73, 84, 92 Stations: PR and Public Education Programs: Total Number of Events Event Type Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts: for Reporting Month 0 School Event 0 0 0 Adult Education 0 0 1 Fair/Safety Expo 3 50 0 Display 0 0 7 Station Tour 10 185 1 Fire Safety Trailer 3 150 0 Other 0 0 Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of initial Field Total Number of Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for 50 Month Reporting Month Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Re-inspectiors for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire Month Prevention Referrals for 1 Reporting Month Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drownings, Road Closures etc Include photos if available. Station 92 attended two prevention events with the explorers. Station 84 responded to fatal traffic collision on Butterfield Stage Rd cross street La Serena Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics 14lfopsto"a i1REP�RtNINT FIRE SINCE 1985 ie John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 8/7/2017 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion,Station,Jurisdiction Incidents Reported for the month of July,2017 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of JuIy,2017 and Temecula City •Com Fire 1 0 1% • False Alarm 44 6 2% •Haz Mat 6 0 8% •Medical 507 71 4% INOther Fire 6 0.8% Other Misc 3 0.4% •Public Assist 3 0.4% •Public Sertwce Assist 37 5.2% •Res Fire 1 0.1% •Rescue 1 0.1% •Ringing Alarm 4 0.6% Standby 7 1 0% • Traffic Collision 84 11.8% •Vehicle Fire 3 0.4% Wldtand Fire 3 0 4% Total 710 100.0% Corn Fire 1 False Alarm 44 Haz Mat 6 Medical 507 Other Fire 6 Other Misc 3 Public Assist 3 Public Service Assist 37 Res Fire 1 Rescue 1 Ringing Alarm 4 Standby 7 Traffic Collision 84 Vehicle Fire 3 Wildland Fire 3 Incident Total: 710 Average Enroute to Onscene Times Enroute Time=When a unit has been acknowledged as responding.Onscene Time=When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene.For any other statistic outside Enroute to Onscene please contact the IT Helo Desk at 951-940-6900 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average Wo 0 to 5 min 474 170 14 3 4.4 71.6% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM,HZMMC,OAC,OAF,OAM,OAMAD,OAMAI,OAMTE,OAMVA, OAP.OAR,OAV,OUT,OOU, LEB, LEO,LEI,BRNPMT,OES, PAA.PAD, PAF,PAO, PAP,HFS HFSAM, HFSCA. HSBT,HSBTC,HSBTS, HSBTV, HSE,HSG Last Updated 8/7/2017 2`_ Page 2 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction Corn False Haz Mat Medical Other Other Public Public Res Rescue Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildlan Fire Alarm Fire Misc Assist Service Fire Alarm Collisio Fire d Fire Balla/Jon 15 •:tatlon 12 Temecula 0 15 0 107 1 2 0 7 0 1 1 0 35 1 2 macula Station Total 0 15 0 107 1 2 0 7 0 1 1 0 35 1 2 tatlon 73 Rancho Temecula 0 12 2 157 1 1 1 16 1 0 1 0 25 2 0 allfornla Station Total 0 12 2 157 1 1 1 16 1 0 1 0 25 2 0 teflon 83 French i emecula 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 alley Station Total 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0 0 0 tation 84 .:!.: 1 3 132 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 16 0 0 •arkview Station Total 1 7 3 132 2 0 2 11 0 0 0 3 18 0 0 -tatlon92Wolf e =.!a U 0 1 9,' 2 0 u 3 0 0 2 4 8 0 1 reek Station Total 0 8 1 97 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 4 8 0 1 Battalion Total 1 44 6 507 6 3 3 37 1 1 4 7 84 3 3 Grand Total 1 44 6 507 6 3 3 37 1 1 4 7 84 3 3 Last Updated 8/7/2017 2° Page 3 of 6 "Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. C N Oi Of P.. P fp tO O O A 11... r 1.- to to n n N N r r r r N N r r r r A A Incidents by Jurisdiction Com Fire False Haz Mat Medical Other Other Public Public Res Fire Rescue Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildland Alarm Fire Misc Assist Service Alarm Collision Fire Fire • emecula 1 44 6 507 6 3 3 37 1 1 4 7 84 3 3 Grand Total 1 44 6 607 6 3 3 37 1 1 4 7 84 3 3 Last Updated 8/7/2017 2`. Page 4 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response limes for all units only the first unit in. a Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary DISTRICT 3 Grand CHUCK Total II Si Corn Fire 1 1 False Alarm 44 44 Haz Mat 6 6 Medical 507 507 Other Fire 6 6 Other Misc 3 3 Public Assist 3 3 Public Service Assist 37 37 Res Fire 1 1 Rescue 1 1 Ringing Alarm 4 4 Standby 7 7 Traffic Collision 84 84 Vehicle Fire 3 3 Midland Fire 3 3 Total 710 710 Last Updated 8/7/2017 2'E Page 5 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. MONTH = 7 and YEAR = 2017 and CITYNAME = 'Temecula' 14,41,i0,... Y -` 1 ' It f. r . ! �` 4► y r 0.1....., I �. r la lif .10 P. `1. i Notoria ili „. li • V,,... •, .0• = • • V '',0?"41',4.i J # •SAO‘• � 4 uJ a t t /Iff_ ,.i .I f .- swl r •;O O �14 �� O rwlr ' J y - Pi I • .'- . Q04 r .7 . .._.ip-- .-a, . i .0 / .• 7 . 0 ' f. • J r --" • r j./ PsCh Mgt! / / • r , , r .r•, IC- �� J1/41i 1 , z- i _ ' ..#- i --till .. - . add ' . . - •., + "� A U U u r $ **Gut. F.1116lnoR • •" ▪ I r -++rr�1 F' +r >L . !'Dila / ,�,,f.7y//.Pala/f2/ /l'.'raauma-Yuima' :1 Legend N Ili Y Fie V Dthar hlh c n Rives ice County Fre Station yl Naz hist Pubtia ServiaeAssists MazolaREae!.ot1onf .4j :.--......n., R,VfrSld€County Fire GIS .i Medical - Last Updated 8/7/2017 2 e Page 6 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. 2017 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2017 Class Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Tont/ CPR/AED 19 6 11 24 129 64 73 326 FIRST AID 16 10 0 60 47 4 8 145 PEDIATRIC FIRST AID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IICP 0 0 0 0 3 U 1 4 STAFF HCP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERT 1 0 0 0 28 0 0 29 TEEN CERT 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 Total 36 16 11 112 207 68 82 0 0 0 0 0 532 INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2017 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 5 FALSE ALARM 68 6 51 73 57 62 44 411 HAZ MAT 4 3 6 3 3 6 6 31 MEDICAL AID 529 513 566 486 525 500 507 3626 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 _ 2 0 2 1 1 6 12 _ OTHER FIRE 5 4 2 8 5 5 3 32 OTHER MISC. 4 3 2 2 5 2 3 21 PSA 42 35 44 39 34 27 37 258 RINGING ALARM 1 0 1 3 0 1 4 10 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2 1 2 2 4 1 1 13 II RESCUE 1 1 1 1 0 0 7 11 STANDBY 14 9 8 12 11 15 1 70 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 69 77 83 71 79 61 84 524 VEHICLE FIRE 1 1 3 1 5 1 3 15 WILDLAND FIRE 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 13 Total 741 707 771 706 731 686 710 0 0 0 0 0 5052 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 800 I 758 700 600 :2 SOU 400 100 207 200 :76 112 '14 2 95 100 1 5 65 49 68 52 :U 3b 6 16 - 95 P..,,, �kOp0.- his- e .p+ SJa SJ�� p �4 Q'`S`. L1 P O`r L.�`1��� °°p�� s V' * 4� -gyp ■2016 YT0 ■2017 YTD 40 MONTH 2u16 YTD 2017 YI'D JANUARY 30 36 FEBRUARY 16 16 MARCH 71 11 APRIL 55 112 • MAY 65 207 JUNE 49 68 JULY 176 82 __ • AUGUST 114 SEPTEMBER 95 • OCTOBER 52 NOVEMBER 35 DECEMBER 0 TOTAL TO DATE 758 532 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 9000 8000 - 7000 6W 5000 4000 ■2016 YTD 3000 ©2017 YTD 2000 x 1000 0 M S � J F ' � 4,- �2 ��QPCQ-. � JN � ` �@4,- J O 0 JPJP � Q � � CI cis � JP c, e- PJ4� 0, `IP �� Q QO � N. .<O MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD JANUARY 693 741 FEBRUARY 675 675 MARCH 621 771 APRIL 681 706 MAY 702 731 JUNE 702 686 JULY 7u8 710 AUGUS"I 699 SEPTEMBER 751 OCTOBER 7-1-4 NOVEMBER 766 DECEMBER 829 TOTAL TO DATE 8571 5020 Fire Department Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: July Reporting Year: 2017 Reporting 12, 73, 84, 92 Stations: PR and Public Education Programs: Total Number of Events Event Type Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts: for Reporting Month • — — — —— — 2 School Event 6 350 1 Adult Education 1 20 0 Fair/Safety Expo 0 0 1 Display 1 0 8 Station Tour 10 125 0 Fire Safety Trailer 0 0 1 Other 2 1 5 Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of Initial Field Total Number of Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for 25 Month Reporting Month Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Re-inspections for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire Month Prevention Referrals for 5 Reporting Month Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's. Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc... Include photos if available. The Temecula Fire department responded to over 700 calls in the month of July, as well as several fire and rescue assignments outside of Temecula City limits. This last month was a very active fire month with several vegetation fires in and around the city.