HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-15 PC Resolution PC RESOLUTION NO. 17-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, AND MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 493,044 SQUARE-FOOT
INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING, AND MEMORY
CARE COMMUNITY CONTAINING 317 UNITS AND A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO
THE LINFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-7) GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET EAST OF
MARGARITA ROAD" (APNS 955-020-019, 955-020-018,
955-020-012, 955-020-017)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On December 21, 2015, Aaron Walker filed Planning Application Nos.
PA15-1885, Development Plan Application, and PA15-1886 a Planned Development
Overlay Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code.
B. On June 21, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
Planning Application Nos. PA15-1885, Development Plan Application, and PA15-1886 a
Planned Development Overlay Amendment (collectively referred to as the "Project').
C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Applications and environmental review on June 21, 2017, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
Planning Application Nos. PA15-1885, Development Plan Application, and PA15-1886 a
Planned Development Overlay Amendment with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program subject to and based upon the findings set forth
hereunder.
F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of Planning Application Nos PA15-1885, Development Plan Application, and PA15-1886
a Planned Development Overlay Amendment
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff
prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the
Development Plan and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the
Project'). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that
there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the
environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The
public comment period commenced on September 23, 2016, and expired on October
24, 2016. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and
inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City
Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Ronald H. Roberts Public
Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library
located at 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website.
C. Five written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a
response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning
Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.
D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration
prior to and at the June 21, 2017 public hearing, and based on the whole record before
it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with
CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect
on the environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.
E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends that City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 21st day of June, 2017.
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
�� z -
Luk so
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 17-15 was duly and regularly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 21St day of June, 2017, by the following vote:
AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GUERRIERO, WATTS, YOUMANS
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NONE
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS TURLEY-TREJO
ABSTAIN: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS TELESIO
Luke Watson
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Linfield Village Senior Housing Development Project
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
PROJECT NAME: Llydield Village Senor Homing Development Pm)ect
PROJECT MANAGER: Sore Cooper,Associate Planner,City of Temecula
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The LmBeld Village Senior Homing Development Project consist of all actions related to the design and construction of an appmpmately 490,D48 SF independent living,assisted
living,and memory care mmmumt9 named'Lnfield Village'on an existing disWrbed 15.58s a vacant bL
PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed Project is genemily bated in Me City of Temecula located at Me Enfield Christian School on Random Vista Road approsinatehr 2,500 feel east of Maigadta Road
at APN 955-020-006.
INTRODUCTION: This document is the b4rgabon MomWdtg and Reporting Program(MI ARP)for the lsifield VAage Senior Housing Project.An MMRP is required for the,proposed Project because
the ISANNO nas identified s3gni5cant adverse impacts,all measures have been identified to negate those enpacis.This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081..6.
of the California Pubfx Reso n es Code which recluses public agencies ro'adopt a reporting all mondmi g Program for the changes made to Me Project or cemditios of project .
appmva,adopted m order to mddgate or avoid significant effects on th envbonment'
As the Mad agency,Me Cry of Temecula will be responsible for morulorng compliance with an"onion measures:DiftemotCity depadments are responsible for various appear.
of the Project.The PAMRP Aenhfies the depuirumt with Me responsibility for ensuring the measure is completed:however.it is expected Mat one or mom departments will
coordinate eP,m"s to ensure mmpl'ar .
The MMRP is presented in tabular from on the following pages.The components of the MMRP are described briefly below.
• Source and ktigation Measure:The mitigation measures are taken from the Initial Sbdyf Abgated Negative Declaration(LWND),in the same order they appear in the
IS/MND.
• Tbring:Identifies at which stage of the Project the mitigation must be completed.
• Monitoring Responsibility:identifies the deparbncet in the City with responsibility for mtigation monitomg.
• Date Completed and Signature:Provides a mntacl who reviewed the mitigation measure and Me date Me measure was determined complete.
11Pacz May 201 ?
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Matrix
City of Temecula
Linfield Village Senior Housing Development Project
DATE
SOURCE MRIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONRORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Section 33, Air Quality Mitigation Maasuryµa1) Prior to Grading Peon City of Temecula Public
Impact 3.3(b), Prior m issuance of Grad"
(c).and(d). arty Grading Permit the CM Engineer shag confirm that the kvianre Works Department
Grading Plan and project speakabws stpulate:.dw, in compliance with
SCAOM Rule 403,excessive l gilwe dust en x sssio shy be controled.by
regular wateMg a other dust prevention meawres, as specified in the
SCAOMD's RuleeeM Regulabars In addition,SCAON®Rile 402 requires'
nrgrlementabon-of dug suppression techniques.to prevent fugerne dusT.from
creating a nuisance oflsge. Implementation of the following measures would
reduce shod-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors:
• Pave or apply water every three hours during daily consouction activities
or apply non-toxic sod stabilizers on al unpaved access roads,parking
areas,and staging areas. More frequent walamg shag occur if dust is
observed migrating from the site during site disWmaxe;
• AM on-site stockpiles of debris,dirt a other dusty,material shag be
enclosed,covered,a mitered twice daily,a nontoxic sod binders shag
be applied;
• AD gradng and excavation operations shall be suspended when wind
speeds exceed 25 miles per hour,
• DBWrbed areas shall be replaced with growl cover or paved
immediately after construction is completed in Ole affected area;
• Tmckartdevlces such asgravet bell track-an amons(3 Inches deep,25
feel king,12 feetwide per lane and edged by and bein a row of stakes)
shad be installed to reduce mud/din track-out from unpaved buck exit
routes.Altematively,a wheel washer shag be used at buck exit routes;
• Onsite vehide speed shag be limited te 15 mites per hour;
• AN material transported off-site shag be either sufficiently watered or
securely covered to prevent excessive anaun5 of dust prior to departing
thejob site;and
• Tends assouatedwith so}hauirg activities shag avoid residential streets
and utiltre City-designated hA mutes to the extent feasible.
2 Pagr i;a.v 2i7
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Section 3.4. Biological Resources Mltlgation Mmure(BIO.1) Prior to initiation of City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(a) construction activities Community Development
and 3.4(0,and Construction should occur outside of the avian breeding;season (generally
Section 3.10, Jamsry d-August 30)..t cons cuceon must occur Worts occur during the avian breeding.
Impact 3.10(c) season.a qualffied biologist shaft conduct-a preconstucom nesting bird Departments
delvanpa survey in all work areaz end all areas within 500 feet of the general
construction zone.This shagocau no me Clan one weak prior to construction..
Active nests shall be given an avoidance buffer,typically 300 feet for non-listed,
nom-raptor species,and 500 feet for listed and raptor species,This buffer shag
remain in place until the young fledge or the nest oNeiwise becomes inactive,
and may be reduced with approval from with US Fish and Widlife Service andlor
California Department of Fish and WIdNe.
Section 3.4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(BID-2) Prior to initiation of City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(a) t nesting duds are present,a 300500 f�1 bulky construction activities Community Development
and 3.4(0,and (reptom and birds of they,
a 500 him buffer,other Lids r ). up IPubhc Worts
Sector 3.10, require, equve a 300 coo fluter shag one set
Impact 3.10(c) armof tie active nest The butter is a n o-mrk zone and construction actnites Departrrents
may not resume until the nest is nolorgeractvi(i.e.avian species are our"ef
show"...nesting behavior,young has fledged).To determine vAxm nesting;
behaviors are frpshed,aquafifled biologist shelf monto the hest mekty until the
young have fledged the area and the nest is no longer active.
Sectim 3.4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(BIO.3) Within 30 days prior to arty City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(a) rounddisWrbing Community Development
and 3.4(0,and No mne then 30 days prior to any ground Gist urbilg construction activities m g
Section 3.10, the Project site,a qualified biologist shag conduct a preconstuction dearence construction activities Department
Impact 3.10(c) survey tot buirming-oads and preseitte within tesuhsof the survey to the City.
The survey shall be completed in areas of sukable habitat Orr and within 250 feet
of ore Project site. .. ..
Sectim 3.4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(SIO.41 Prior to Grading Permit City of Temecula Public
Impact 3.4(b) issuance Works Depurnment
and 3A(c),and Prior 10 issuance of a grading Period,Ne Prgied.Applicant shall gain appnwal of
Section 3.9, a Clean Wa rAct Section404 pamd from Me Army Corps of Engineers,a Clean
Impact 3.9(d) water Act Secion 401 Water Quatty CertbcaUpn from the San Diego Regional
Oualuy Control Beam,and a Section 1602 StearnbedAlteration Agieementfrom
Me Caldomur Department of Fish and Wildlife for Project impacts to 0.2 acre of
USAC0E1RWQCB jurisdictional waters and 0.19 we of'npacts to CDFW
associated riparian habitat Mutig with expansion of Rardw Vista Road.
Section 3.4, Biological ResourdesMiUgatIon Measure(BIO.5) Prior to Grading Permit City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(b) prior lo issuance of a grading pent, and separate tan an issuance Community Development
and 3.4 3.9 and - Y Penepare
Setter 3.9, requirements oftwatleded wiMGteagmcips,the Protect Applicant slwg Prepare IPUblk Works
Impact 3.9(d) a Determination of Bwbgicolty Equivalent or Superior Preservation(DBESP) Departments
analysis,pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.12 of the under the Western
Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan(MSHCP).The
OBESP Shall be submitted to and approved by the appropriate WMIrte Agencies
prior to any Prgje ff whited groun"studnng activities.
3 .
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Section 3S, Cultural Resources Mltgatbn Measure(CUL•1) During Eartlsneving City ofTemeaAa -
Impact 35(b) An archaeological monator shag be Achvifies Community Development
preset dung arty eaMmwing actuites
associated with the PMjecL The monitor shall work seder tlm dead eupemisbn Department
of a abrral heswrce'pmfessiorW who meets the Secretary of Interiors
Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology. In the event an
archwobgical resource is uncovered, the monitor shall be empowered In
tempera*halt or redirect construction for work In the vicinity at any find until the
Project archaeologist can evatoate M.In Me event of a relevant fad,salvage
excavation and reporting will be required.Gradop a further ground disturbance
shag not resume within the area of the discovery wild an agreement has been
reacted by the developer,the archaeologist and the Mm Vg Director.Any
recovered ardmoogicai resources shall be processed and arattd according to
coment professional reposilay standards as appropriate.The collectors and
associated records shall be donated to an appropriate eaation faciiry,or,the
artifacts may be delivered to the appropriate Native American Tribes)if that's
recommended by Ire City.A final reponoontainig the signrlcanw and treatment
fudngs shag be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City,t
required.
Section 35, Cultural Resouma Mi0ption MNSUre(CULQ) During Eartlmovkg City of Temeoule
Impact 35(c) A paleontological morhilor shag be present during any earthman activities Activities Community Development
associated with the Project The monitor shay work wrier the direct supervision /Public Works
of a paleontological resource protessimai who meets the mirimwn quaMiwtore Deparmens
for a vertebrate paleontologist as described in the Standard Procedures for the
Assessment and kgtigation of Adverse Impacts to Palumbilogicel Resources by
the Society of vertebrate Pelee. y(2010).to the even[a paleontological
resource is uncovered,the mentor slag be empowered to temgoraty haft or
redirect construction for work in the vicinity of any fad wild the Pmjecl
paleontobpst can evaluate 0.to the evenlnf a relevant find,salvage excavation
and reporting will be required.Grading a hatltar ground dstubonce shag not
resume wan in IN area of the discovery until m agreementhas been reached by
the developer, the Paleontolgst.and the Plannvg Director.Any recovered
paleontological reseumes shag be processed and araled acoadvg b current
professional reposimry standards as appropriate.The colectias and associated
records shall be donated to an appropriate curation facility,or,the ahtilaar may
be delivered to tie appropriate Native American Tribes)t that is recommended
by th City.A foal report contani g th sgnifiance and treatment findings shall
be prepared by the paleontologist and submitted to the City,d required.
Section 3.5, Cultural Rasourca Mitigation Masure(CULJ) Dung Project City of Temecula
Impact 35(d) Consistent with State GEOA Guidelines,Section 150645,Subdivision(e),in the Canstucttn Community Development
eventoran accidental discovery or tecognitionofmy human remains,the County /Public Works
Couturier shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall Departments
be hated.If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American
Heritage Commission(NAHC)shat be noti0ed within 24 lours by ft Como
Curtner.The NAHC must immediately notify the,Most Likely Descendent(s)
adder.PObfic Resowces..Code 5097.98 and the.descendents,must make
4 1Page ?V' a7 2017
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
recomnendatim Of Preference for treamernt within 48 tows of being granted
access to he site.Guidelines of the NAHC shad be adhered to in the treatment
and deposition of he remains in accordance with the provisions at Henan and
Safety Code§7050.5 and Public Resources Code§5097.98,
Section 3.6, Geology and Sol)$Mitigation Memure(GEO0.1) During Project City of Temecula Public
and�Secian 3.9, In accordance with the:National Pollutant Discharge ENNnadon System Construction Wales Department
Impact 3.9(a) requnume ds; the Project Applicant would prepare a Sbmnrater Polliuon
Prevention Plat(SWPPP)for approval by the City prior to grading activities.The
SWPPP.wil include.relevanl.Best IMi iagement Practices(BAWS)In order to
ndnhdze sod enosien and water quality impacts during Project construction,
Section 3.8, Hazards and Hmerdous Materials Mltigetion Measure(HAZ•1) During Pm)ect City of Temer>ria
Impact 3.8(d)
The Project Appt'rant shad retch he services of a Registered Professional Construction Community Development
Engineer or Geologat wan experience to remedial investigation,available for I Public Worts
consulta8on during sod"'ezcsration and:grading activities. The Registered Departments
Pro'ei51a1a1 Eogiieei or C,eotigW shad teg'wen foil authority ro oversee any
eirhn&vk4activities to determine 8 dahabed soils are mntamhated:
Section 3.8, Hoards and Haarcim Materhk Mitigation Measure(W -2) During Project City of Temecula Pubic
btpact 3.8(d) 0poenta i contaminated sod a UneaMed during she disturbance activities,he Conshictiat Works Department
Registered Profam ma Engineer or Geologist shall inspect the identified aea
and deem" the need for sampfmg to confirm the mime and extent of
confaminadon. Depending on the nature and edent.of contamination, the
Regataed.Pmfessional Engineer or Geologist shat have the authority to
temporarily suspend construction activity at that location for the protection of
workers or he public. 0 the Registered Professitiial_Engineer or Geologist
detemunes Nat significant remeoialion is necessary,the Project Applicant shad
contact representatives of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board,
Department of Toxic Substances Control:and other btu agences.d applicable.
for 9Ui0ernce and Possible oversight.The applicant wit be required to Implement
all requirements identified by San Diego Regional Water Qu"Cbmrdl Board
and Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Section 3.12, Nolse Mitigation Measure(140F1) Prior to Grading Permit City of Temecula
Impact 3.12(a), Prior m Grading Permit issuance, the Applicant shad demonstrate, ro the �� Community Development
3.12(c),and 3.12 9 PP
(d) satisfaction of he Director of Community Development that the Project complies Department
with he following:
• Cmstruc im contracts spedty,that all construction equipment,fixed or
mobile,that be eguippedvdh property operating and maintained mRBers-
and other state required noise attenuation devices.
• Properly owners and occupants located w0hin 200 feet of the Pmject
boundary shall be sent a nonce,at least 15 days prior to commencement
of construction of each phase,regarding he construction schedule of the
proposed Prxject A sign,legible at a distance of 50 feet shad also ce
DATE
SDDRCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Posted at the PrOad construction site. All notices and sties shall be
reviewed and approved by the City of Temecuta Planning Depamront,
prior to ma0ng or posting and shall indicate the dates all duration of
cornstruNOn activities,as well as provide acontact ianm all a le e*w
nanba where residents on hpui s about the construction process and
regstercongUints.
• Co shs;don haW mutes shag be designed to avoid nose sensitive uses
(e.9.,residences,wnsalescent hmies,Mc),to the extent feasible.
• Dung construction,stadaiay construction equipment shall be placed
such that emitted noise s directed away from sensitive nose mceivas.
• Construction acbvibes shag not take place outside of the allowable hours
speared by the Ciys Munidpal Code Sedbon920A60(D)(7:00 an.and
6:30 an. kbMay through Saturday; oonsfircour activities are not
perdtled on Sundays or national ha"s).
• Construction haul males shag be designed to mid noise sensitive uses
(e.g.,residenes,convalescent homes,sdoos,Munites,etc.),to the
extent feasible.
• During construction,stationary eonsoucEOn equipment shag be placed
such Mat emitted noise is directed arty from sensitive rose receptors.
6 P a 9 e Pd 2y ?tit -
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
RESOLUTION NO. 17-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, AND MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
AMENDMENT TO THE LINFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-7) AND A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 493,044
SQUARE-FOOT INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING,
AND MEMORY CARE COMMUNITY CONTAINING 317
UNITS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
RANCHO VISTA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET
EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD (APNS 955-020-019, 955-
020-018, 955-020-012, 955-020-017)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On December 21, 2015, Aaron Walker filed Planning Application Nos.
PA15-1886, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment and PA15-1885 a
Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code.
B. On June 21, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
Planning Application Nos. PA15-1886, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment,
and PA15-1885 a Development Plan Application (collectively referred to as the
"Project').
C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively
referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is
the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the
Project.
E. On June 21, 2017, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or
at the public hearing on June 21, 2017, at which time the City staff presented its report,
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
F. The Planning Commission reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at
the June 21 , 2017 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it found that:
(1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2)
there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the
environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.
G. On August 8, 2017, the City Council considered the Project and the
Mitigated Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing at which time the City
staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
H. The City Council reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
considered all testimony and comments received regarding the Project and the
Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the August 8, 2017 public hearing, and
based on substantial evidence in the whole record before it finds that:
(1) The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;
(2) There is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect
on the environment; and
(3) The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and
analysis of the City Council.
Section 2. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council
hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring
Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. The
mitigation measures included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be imposed as
enforceable conditions of approval of the Project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 8th day August of, 2017.
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the
City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 8th day of August, 2017, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Linfield Village Senior Housing Development Project
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
PROJECT NAME: Linfield Village Senior Housing Development Project
PROJECT MANAGER: Scott Cooper,Associate Planner,City of Temecula
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Linfield Village Senior Housing Development Project consists of all actions related to the design and consm¢tion of an approximatey 490,048 SF independent living,assisted
living,ark memory care community named'Linfield Village'on an existing disturbed 15.58-acre vacant lot.
PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed Project is generally located in the City of Temecula located at the Linfield Christian Scrod on Rancho Vista Road approximately 2,500 feet east of Margarita Road
at APN 955-020-006.
INTRODUCTION: This document is tie Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP)for tie Linfield Village Senior Housing Project.An MMRP is required M the proposed Project because
the GRAND has Identified significant adverse impacts,and measures have been Identified to mitigate those impacts.This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6
of the California Public Resources Code,which requires public agencies to'adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project
approval,adopted In order to mitigate or amid significant effects on the envimnmenL'
As the lead agency,the City of Temecula will be responsible for monitoring compliance with all mitigation measures.Different City departments are responsible for various aspects
of the Project.The MMRP Identifies the department with the responsibility for ensuring the measure Is completed;however,it Is expected that one or more departments will
coordinate efforts to ensure compliance,
The MMRP is presented In tabular form on the following pages.The components of the MMRP are described lode8y below,
• Same and Mltgaton Measure:The mitigation measures are taken from the Initial St dylMltigated Negative Decoration(ISIMND),In the some order they appear In the
ISIMND.
• Timing:Identifies at which stage of the Project the mitigation must be completed.
• Monitoring Responsibility:Identifies the department in the City wive responsibility for mitigation monitoring.
• Date Completed and Signature:Provides a contact who reviewed the mitigation measure and the date the measure was determined complete.
1 Page May 2017
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Matrix
City of Temecula
Linfield Village Senior Housing Development Project
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Section 33, Air Quality Mitigation Measure(AO-t) Prior to Grading Pemu City of Ternii Public
Impact 3.3(b), Issuance Works Department
(c),and(d). Prior to issuance of any Grading Permit,the City Engineer shag confirm that the
Grading Plan end project specifications stipulate that, in compliance with
SCAOMO Rule 403,excessive fugitive dust emssions shall be controlled by
regular watering or other dust prevention measures, as specified in the
SCAOMD's Rules and Regulations. In addition,SCAOMD Rule 402 requires
implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from
creating a nuisance off-rate. Implementation of the lollowing measures would
reduce short-term hgitve dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors;
• Pave or apply water every three hours during daily construction activities
or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads,parking
areas,and staging areas. More frequent watering shall occur If dust is
observed migrating from the site during site disturbance;
• Any on-site stockpiles of debris, did,or other dusty materiel shall be
enclosed,covered,or watered twice dally,or non-toxic soll binders shall
be applied;
• AN grading and excavation operations shall be suspended when wind
speeds exceed 25 miles per hour;
• Disturbed areas shell be replaced with ground cover or paved
immediately after construction Is completed in the affected area;
• Track-out devices such as gravel bed track-out aprons(3 Inches deep,25
feet long,12 feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes)
shall be installed to reduce mudldld trackout from unpaved truck exit
routes. Alternatively,a wheel washer shad be used at truck exit routes;
• On-site vehicle speed shag be limited to 15 miles per hour;
• All material transported offsite shall be either sufficiently watered or
securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust prior to departing
the job age;and
• Trucks associated with soil-hauling activities shag amid residential sheers
and utilize City-designated truck routes to the extent feasible.
2 Page
flay 2 011
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Section 3,4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(BIO.1) Prior to Initiation of City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(a) construction activities Community Development
and 3.4(Q,and Construction strand occur outside of tice avian breeding season (generally
Section 3.10, January 1 -August 30).If construction must occur during the avian weeding IPUblic Works
be
Impact 3.10(c) season, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird Departments
clearance survey in al wok areas and all areas within 500 feet of the general
construction zone.This shall occur no more than one wreak prior to construction.
Active nests shall be given an avoidance buffer,typically 300 feel for non-listed,
non-rapor species,and 500 feet for listed and raptor species.This buffer shall
remain in place until the young fledge or the nest otherwise becomes inactive,
and may be reduced with approval from with US Fish and Wildlife Service andlor
California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Section 34, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(BIO.2) Prior 0 initiation of City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(a) construction activities Community Development
and 3.4(Q,and If nesting birds am present, a 300.500 toot buffer(raptors and birds of prey /Public Works
Section 3.10, require a 500 foot buffer,other birds require a 300 foot butter)shall be set up
Impact 3,10(c) around the active nest.The buffer is a no-work zone and construction activities Deparbrimis
may not resume unlit the nest is no longer active(i.e.avian species are no longer
showing nesting behavior,young have fledged). To determine when nesting
behaviors are finished,a qualified biologist shall monitor the nest weekly unfit the
young have fledged the area and the nest is no longer active.
Section 3.4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(810.3) Within 30 days prior to any City of Temecula
Impact 3.4(a) ground-disturbing Community Development
and 3.4(Q and No more than 30 days prior to any ground-disturbing construction actiNtes on
Section 3.10, the Project site,a qualified biologist shall conduct a pmconstruction clearance construction activities Department
Impact 3.to(c) survey for burrowing owls and presentthe written results of the survey to the City.
The survey shall be completed in areas of suitable habitat on and within 250 feet
of the Project site.
Section 3.4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(BIO.4) Prior to Grading Permit City of Temecula Public
Impact 34(b) Issuance Works Department
and 3.4(c),and Prior to Issuance of a grading permit,the Project Applicant shall gain approval of
Sector,3.9, a Clean WalerAct Section 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers,a Clean
Impact 3,9(d) Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cenitkatlon from the San Diego Regional
Quality Control Board,and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for Project impacts to 0.2 acre of
USACOE/RWQCB jurisdictional waters and 0.19 acre of impacts to CDFW
associated riparian habitat resulting with expansion of Ranctho Vista Road.
Section 3.4, Biological Resources Mitigation Measure(BIO.5) Prior to Grading Permit Gry of Temecula
Impact 34(b) Issuance Community Development
and 3.4(c),and Prior m issuance of a grading permit, and separate iron any permitOng /Pudic Works
Section 3.9, requirements of the affected wildlife agencies,the Project Applicant shall prepare
Impact 3.9(d) a Deter nination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (08ESP) Depenreents
analyss,pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.1.2 of the under the Western
Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan(MSHCP). The
DBESP shall be submitted to and approved by the appropriate Wildlife Agendas
prior to any Project-related gmunddisturbing acivfies.
3 1Page May 2017
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
Section 3.5, Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure(CUL•1) During EarNmoving City of Temecula
Impact 3.5(b) Activities Community Development
An archaeological monitor shell be present during any eaMmoving activitles
associated with Ina Project.The monitor shall work under the direct supervision Department
of a cultural resource professional who meets the Seoretery of Intenor's
Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology. In the event an
archaeological resource is uncovered, the monitor shall be empowered lo
temporarily halt or redirect construction for work in the vicinity of any find until the
Project archaeologist an evaluate it. In the event of a relevant find,salvage
excavation and reporting will be required.Grading or further ground disturbance
shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been
reached by the developer,the archaeologist, and the Planning Director.Any
recovered archaeological resources shall be processed and curated according to
current professional repository standards as appropriate.The collections and
associated records shall be donated to an appropriate curaton facility,or,the
artifacts may be delivered to the appropriate Native Amman Tnbe(s)if that Is
recommended by the City.A final report containing the significance and treatment
findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City, if
required.
Section 3.5, Culture[Resources Mitigation Measure(CUt42) During Earthmoving City of Temecula
Impact 3,5(c) Activities Community Development
A associated with the monitor shall m present during any earthrtpdng a supervision IPublic Works
associated with the Project.The monitor shell work under the direct supervslon
of a paleontological resource professional who meets the minimum qualifications Departments
for a vertebrate paleontologist as described in the Standard Procedures for the
Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources by
the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology(2010).In the event a paleontological
resource is uncovered,the monitor shall be empowered to temporally halt or
redirect conslmdlon for work in the vicinity of any find until the Project
paleontologist on evaluate it.In the event of a relevant find,salvage excavation
and reporting will be required.Grading or further ground disturbance shell not
resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by
the developer, the paleontologist, and the Planning Director. Any recovered
paleontological resources shall be processed and curated according to current
professional repository standards as appropriate.The collections and associated
records shall be donated o an appropriate curation facility,or,the arafacts may
be delivered to the appropriate Native American Tnbe(s)if that is recommended
by the City.A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall
be prepared by the paleontologist and submitted to the City,if required.
Section 3.5, Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure(CUL•3) During Project City of Temecula
Impact 3.5(d) Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines,Section 15004.5,Subdivision(a),in the Const icton Community Development
eventof an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains,the County IPublic Works
Coroner shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall Departments
be halted,If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American
Heritage Commission(NAHC)shall be notified within 24 tours by the County
Coroner. The NAHC must immediately nobly the Most Likely Descendent(s)
under Public Resources Code 5007.98 and the descendents must make
4 IPa9e May 2017
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
recommendations or preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted
access o the site.Guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered o in the treatment
and disposition of the remains in accordance with the provisions of Heath and
Safety Code§7050.5 and Public Resources Code§5097.98.
Section 3.6, Geology and Solis Mitigation Measure(GEO-1) During Project City of Temecula Public
Impact 3.6(b) Construction Works Department
arid Section 319, In accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Eltninaton System
Impact 3.9(a) requirements, the Project Applicant would prepare a Slonnwater Pollution
Prevention Plan(SWPPP)for approval by the City prior to grading acfivities.The
SWPPP will include relevant Best Management Practices(BMPs)in order to
miNm¢e soil erosion and water quality impacts during Project instruction.
Section 3 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitgation Measure(HAZ-1) During Project City of Temecula
Impact 3.8(d) The P act Construction Community Development
roj Applicant shatl retain the services of a Registered Professional
Engineer or Geologist,with experience in remedial Investigation,available for I Pudic Wales
consultation during soil excavation and grading activities, The Registered Departments
Professional Engineer or Geologist shall be given full authority to oversee any
eanhmoving activities to determine if disturbed soils are contaminated.
Section 3.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materiels Mlgation Measure(HAZ-2) During Project City of Temecula Public
Impact 3.8(d) If potentially contaminated soil Is unearthed during site disturbance activities,the Construction Works Department
Registered Professional Engineer or Geologist shall Inspect the Identified area
and determine the need for sampling to confirm the nature and extent of
contamination. Depending on the nature and extent of contamination, the
Registered Professional Engineer or Geologist shall have the authority to
temporarily suspend construction activity at that location for the protection of
workers or the public. If the Registered Professional Engineer or Geologist
determines that significant remedlalon is necessary,the Project Applicant shall
contact representatives of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board,
Department of Toxic Substances Control,and other local agendas,If applicable,
for guidance and possible oversight.The applicant will be required to Implement
all requirements identified by San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
and Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Section 3.12, Noise Mitigation Measure(NOIA) Prior to Grading Permit City of Temecula
Impact 3.12(a), Issuance Community Development
3.12(c),and 3.12 Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Applicant shall demonstrate, o the
(d) satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that the Project complies Department
with the following:
• Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment,fixed or
mobile,shatl be equipped with property operating and maintained mufflers
and other state requited noise attenuation devices.
• Property owners and occupants located within 200 feet of the Prowl
boundary shall be sent a notice,at least 15 days prior to canmencernent
of construction of each phase,regarding the construction schedule of the
Proposed Project. A sign,' legible at a distance of 50 feet shall also be
5 1 P a g e
May 2017
DATE
SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING COMPLETED SIGNATURE
posted at the Project construction site. All notices and sons shall be
reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula Planning Department,
prior to mailing or posting and shag indicate the dabs and duration of
construction activities,as well as provide a contact name and a telephone
number where residents an inquire about the construction process and
register complaints.
• Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses
(e.g.,residences,convalescent homes,etc.),to the extent feasible.
• During constmcton,stationary construction equipment shall be placed
such that emitted noise is directed any from sensitive noise receivers.
• Construction activities shall not lake place outside of the allowable hours
specified by the City's Municipal Code Section 9.20.060(D)(7:00 a.m.and
6:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday: construction activities are not
permitted on Sundays or national holidays).
• Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses
(e.g,residences,convalescent homes,schools,churches,etc.),to the
extent feasible.
• During construction,stationary construction equipment shall be placed
such that emitted noise Is directed away from sensitive noise receptors.
6 Page May 2017