HomeMy WebLinkAbout061394 RDA AgendaAGENDA
CITY OF TEMECULA
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA CITY HALL - ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
43174 Business Park Drive
JUNE 13, 1994 - 6:30 PM
IEXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:30 PM, C~osed Seedon of the Committee pursuant to
Government Code §54956.9(c)- Potential UdOation
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag ~alute
Chairman Dallas Gray presiding.
Member Susie Bridges
ROLL CALL: Committee
Members: Bridges, Gray, Jenkins, Maurice, Pelonero, Reed, Walton
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of May 31, 1994.
1.2 Approve the minutes of the meeting of June 7, 1994.
Authorization for Consultina Services Agreements - Traffic Imoact Analysis and
Architectural and Plannino Services - Old Town Entertainment Project
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Review and comment on agreements with Wimberly, Allison, Tong and Goo for .
architectural and planning services not to exceed $54,620 and with Barton-
Aschman for Traffic Analysis not to exceed ~34,000. The agreements will be
subject to the approval of the Executive Director and General Counsel as to final
form.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: July 5, 1994, 6:30 PM, Temecula City Hall, Main Conference Room,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMII'rEE
May 31, 1994- 6:30 PM
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Old Town Redevelopmerit Advisory Committee was
called to order on Tuesday, May 31, 1994, 6:35 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Main
Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, Vice Chairman Nancy
Maurice presiding. Committee Member Bonnie Reed led the flag salute.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
4 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Gray, Jenkins, Maurice, Reed
3 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Bridges, Pelonero, Walton
Also present were City Manager/Executive Director Ron Bradley, Redevelopment Consultant
Marilyn Whisenand and City Clerk/Agency Secretary June Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
redevelopment area.
RDC05/31/94
Aooroval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 · Approve the minutes of the meeting of March 21, 1994.
It was moved by Committee Member Reed, seconded by Committee Member Jenkins
to approve the minutes of the meeting of March 21, 1994.
AYES: 3 COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
ABSENT: 3 COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: I COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Committee Member Walton arrived at 6:39 PM.
;
Redevelooment Status Report
Executive Director Bradley presented the status report of activities within the
He outlined the meetings that have been taking place regarding the
Jenkins, Maurice, Reed
None
Bridges, Pelonero, Walton
Grey
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES May 31, 1994
Firestone Property which is presently located outside the RDA boundaries.
Mr. Bradley then introduced Marilyn Whisenand, who has been hired by the City of
Temecula to serve as the consultant on redevelopment matters in the Old Town Temecul8
project.
3. Consultant Contracts/Old ~own Temecula Entertainment Project
Ms. Whisenand outlined the contracts with Barton Aschman Associates for traffic
consulting within the Old Town Entertainment project. She stated this contract has a $34,000
maximum. She also discussed the proposed contract with Wimberly, Allison, Tong and Goo
who will serve as the architectural consultants;. This contract will be approximately $54,000.
Committee Member Walton asked if the Price Waterhouse contract will involve that firm
in bond sales for the Redavelopment area. Executive Director Bradley responded that bond
sales are not in the scope of work for this consulting agreement. He explained that they will
be performing market analysis, economic feasibility studies and preparing economic impacts.
Committee Member Walton asked if the economic studies will give the impacts to
individual businesses in Old Town. Marilyn Whisenand responded that the study is designed
to address specific impacts on Old Town as a whole but will not focus on individual
businesses. Executive Director Bradley said the City will work with the property owners to
insure that when improvements are made in Old Town they are phased to mitigate impacts
to the greatest extent possible. He advised however, that these considerations are "down the
road" at this point in time.
Vice Chairman Maurice asked if the City will be assigning a staff member who will be
designated to provide the public and press with information regarding the timing of the project.
Mr. Bradley advised the committee that if and when the project is approved, timely
communications will be an important consideration.
It was moved by Chairman Grey, seconded by Committee Member Walton to continue
consideration of the contracts with Wimberly, Allison, Tong and Goo and with Barton
Aschman until the committee has had the opportunity to review the contract documents. It
was further moved that a meeting of the committee be held on Tuesday, June 7, 1994 at
6:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Committee Members Bridges and
Pelonero absent.
It was moved by Committee Member Walton, seconded by Chairman Grey that the City
provide all necessary information to the Redevelopment Advisory Committee prior to any
matters being placed on the Redevelopment Agency agenda and that when necessary, special
meetings be held to accommodate the time cor~straints of the Committee. The motion was
unanimously carried with Committee Members Bridges and Pelonero absent.
Committee Member Walton stated he feels the Advisory Committee was formed to
protect the merchants and people in Old Town from actions taken by the City without their
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITrEE MINUTES May 31.1994
involvement. He stated he believes the Advisory Committee has the right to see everything
about Old Town first before the Redevelopmerit Agency or City Council takes any action.
4. First Year CaDital Imorovement Prooram Imolementation for the Old Town Soecific Plan
Planner David Hogan presented a staff report reviewing the first year implementation
program for the Old Town Specific Plan which was presented to the Committee on March 2,
1993 and approved by the City Council on February 8, 1994.
Committee Member Jenkins questioned if the Main Street Bridge will have emergency
vehicle access when it is converted to a pedestrian bridge? Mr. Hogan advised that
emergency access had not been specifically addressed in the context of the conversion of the
Main Street Bridge but he was confident that the entire subject of emergency access to the
area west of Murrieta Creek will be carefully studied when the First and Sixth Street bridges
are engineered.
Committee Member Walton questioned the accuracy of the estimated costs outlined
in Attachment No. I of the staff report. He also asked if the projects presently targeted to
be completed in the exhibit will be changed as a result of the Zev Buffman (Old Town
Entertainment) project. Mr. Hogan responded that the project timetables may be modified to
accommodate necessary infrastructure improvements.
Committee Member Walton asked if the City can assist, using RDA funds, with the
erection of large lighted signs, similar to those proposed for the Auto Center, at either end of
the freeway, to promote Old Town. Executive Director Bradley advised that a number of
factors enter into placement of signs of that type along the freeway such as Highway
Beautification Zones and those factors would need to be addressed whenever signs of that
type are being considered.
Chairman Gray asked which projects, in the list of first year activities, are likely to be
deferred7 David Hogan responded that the Parking Assessment District Feasibility Study, the
Underground Utility Feasibility Study and the Business Improvement District Educational
Program and the materials for the Business Recruitment Assistance Group (BRAG) Team all
might be likely projects for delay.
The committee discussed the logo contest and questioned the cost of the logo
development and the time required to complete the design, Vice Chairman Maurice expressed
her strong feeling that a logo should be an integral part of the Old Town development and the
time to develop a logo is well spent.
It was moved by Committee Member Wa~ton, seconded by Chairman Gray to approve
the eight first year activities as outlined in the staff report as follows:
Alignment and design study for the Santiago Road/First Street Bridge.
Estimated cost: $100,000.
RDC05131/94 3 06/08/94
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITrEE MINUTES May 31.1994
2. Support for the 'Main Street Program. Estimated cost: $75:000.
3. Old Town Signage, Billboard Lease. Estimated cost $12,000.
4. Old Town Logo Design Competition. Estimated cost: $8,000.
5. Construct the Old Town Gateway Arch. Estimated cost: ~ 12,000.
Prepare a streetscape design and prepare construction drawings and
specifications for West Main Street Demonstration Project. Estimated Cost
$275,00.
Construct drainage improvements on Third and Sixth Street. Estimated cost:
$100,000.
Design and construct the Sixth Street Parking Lot Improvements. Estimated
cost: $515,3t5.
The motion was unanimously carried with Members Bridges and Pelonaro absent.
Chairman Gray asked about the response from the RFP's for the demonstration block
program. Dave Hogan responded that the response has not been good. He advised that he
expects a one year implementation period for this project. Committee Member Walton asked
if funding is available if an Old Town business would like to have its facade improved,
Executive Director Bradley suggested that the committee might wish to recommend to
the Redevelopment Agency that additional funds be made available during year one for the Old
Town facade program.
It was moved by Committee Member Walton, seconded by Committee Member Reed
to recommend to the Redevelopment Agency that Iowainterest funds be made available
immediately to fund any improvements in Old Town for renovation or upgrading of existing
businesses and that thb public be made aware that this funding is available and further that
the limit of the low interest loans be raised in excess of $100,000. Chairman Gray
questioned where the $100,000. loan amount came from. Executive Director Bradley
explained that the City Council, acting as the Redevelopment Agency, had set aside
$1,000,000. from the original bond proceeds to provide funding for at least ten (10) qualified
individuals for low interest loans.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES:
1 COMMITTEE MEMI~R: Walton
NOES:
4 COMMITTEE MEMBER: Reed, Maurice, Gray, Jenkins
ABSENT: 2 COMMITTEE MEMBER: Bridges, Pelonero
RDC05131194 4 06/08194
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES May 31, 1994
5. DiscuSsion of Committee Structure
Vice Chairman Maurice stated since this matter had been discussed fully, during Item
No. 3 of the meeting and hearing no objections, she would go on to the next agenda item.
6. New Business
Vice Chairman Maurice questioned the reason the funding of the Temecula Museum
building was changed from RDA funding to funding from the City's General Fund. Marilyn
Whisenand explained that the decision was based on the fact that if funded by the RDA,
prevailing wages must be paid for all construction work on the project. Under certain
circumstances, this need not be the case if funded from the General Fund and that would yield
substantial savings on construction costs.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. Bradley reported on the progress of negotiations with International Rectifier to
assist them to expand their present location in Temecula which will result in the creation of
additional jobs within the community.
COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Committee Member Reed, seconded by Committee Member Jenkins to
adjourn at 8:50 P.M. The motion was carried unanimously.
A special meeting of the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee will be held on
Tuesday, June 7, 1994, 6:30 P.M. at the Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Chairman Dallas Gray
June S. Greek, City Clerk
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
JUNE 7, 1994 - 6:30 PM
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee was
called to order on Tuesday, June 7, 1994, 6:30 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Main
Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, Chairman Dallas Gray
presiding. Committee Member Ron Walton led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 4 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Gray, Maurice, Reed, Walton
ABSENT: 3 COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Bridges, Jenkins, Pelonero
Also present were City Manager Ron Bradley, Redevelopmerit Consultant Marilyn Weisenand
and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
NORe
COMMITTEE MEMBER DISCUSSION
Committee Member Walton stated that over the past several months there have been several
items that affected the Redevelopment Agency with respect to Old Town decisions, the major
change proposed to the Advisory Committee without communication to the Advisory
Committee and the fact that at the March meeting there was a unanimous vote protesting the
lack of communication without any response or acknowledgment since that time. He also
stated he has "generally increasing concerns regarding the lack of ability for proposals of the
Article I of one of the by-laws of this committee".
It was proposed by Chairman Gray that the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee
hold a Special meeting to address Item I of tonight's agenda and enter into a closed session
for the purposes of discussing potential and initiating litigation, to be held on Monday, June
13, 1994, 6:30 P.M. at'the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Gray said the purpose of the closed session would be to discuss the initiation of a
particular lawsuit pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 Subsection C.
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Authorization for Consultinn Services ~,Qreements - Traffic Imoact Analysis and
Architectural and Plannine Services - Old Town Entertainment Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
RDCO6/O7194 1 06/08/94
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
' JUNE 7, 1994
1.1
Review and comment on agreements with Wimberly, Allison, Tong and Goo for
architectural and planning services not to exceed $54,620 and with Barton-
Aschman for Traffic Analysis not to exceed $34,000° The agreements will be
subject to the approval of the Executive Director and General Counsel as to final
form.
It was moved by Committee Member Walton, seconded by Committee Member Reed
to continue Item I to a special meeting to be held June 13, 1994.
AYES:
4 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Gray, Maurice, Reed, Walton
NOES: 0 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 3 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Bridges, Jenkins, Pelonero
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None
COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Committee Member Reed, seconded by Committee Member Walton to
adjourn at 6:35 P.M. The motion was carried unanimously.
A special meeting of the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee will be held on
Monday, June 13, 1994, 6:30 P.M. at the Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Next regular meeting: July 5, 1994, 6:30 PM, Temecula City Hall, Main Conference Room,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Chairman Dallas Gray
RDC06/07/94 2 06/08/94
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Advisory Committee
Executive Director/City Manager
June 13, 1994
Authorization for Consulting Services Agreements - Traffic Impact
Analysis and Architectural end Planning Services Old Town
Entertainment Project
PREPARED BY: June Greek, City Clerk/Redevelopment Agency Secretary
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and comment on agreements with Wimberly, Allison,
Tong and Goo for architectural and planning services - not to
exceed $54,620 and with Barton-Aschman for traffic analysis -
not to exceed $34,000. The agreements will be subject to the
approval of the Executive Director and General Counsel as to final
form.
DISCUSSION: Attached you will find the staff report which is being forwarded
to the Redevelopment Agency for action at the meeting of June 14, 1994. This report
outlines the staff recommendation, the background and the fiscal impact of the recommended
action. This is a duplicate of the material that was sent to the Committee for consideration
and tabled at the meeting of June 7, 1994.
JSG
APPROVAL
CITY ATI'ORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER;
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Bonald E. Bradley, Executive Director
June 14,1994
Authorization of Agreement for ConsultingServicesforOIdTownT.Z.B.G.,Inc.
Project
PREPARED BY: Marilyn Whisenand
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Fiedevelopment Agency authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with
Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo for architectural and planning services not to exceed $54,620
and with Bar~on-Aschman for traffic impact analysis not to exceed $34,000. Agreements will
be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form.
DISCUSSION:
On March 22, 1994, an appropriation of $125,000 was authorized for the purpose of
conducting feasibility studies as required by the Memorandum of Understanding between the
City and Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and T.Z.B.G. Inc. (Zev Buffman). To date,
contracts have been authorized with Price Waterhouse in the amount of $75,000for economic
planning services and Tom Dodson and Associates in the amount of $75,800 for preparation
of an environmental impact report. This authorization will bring the consultant services
authorized to date to a total of $239,420, of which T.Z.B.G., Inc. is responsible for one-half.
The scope of work for Bar~on-Aschman and Wimberiy Allison Tong & Goo is fully described
in the attached proposals.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available for the City's portion of the fees (one-half, not to exceed a total of
$125,000). The balance will be billed to TZBG. Inc.
Attachment: Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo - Proposal
Ba~on-Aschman Progosal
Wimberly Allison Tong & Coo
Arcqllteet.~ and Phmtaet~
13 May 1994
Mr. Run Bradley
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Tcmccula, California 92~90
Via Faesimile
909/694-1999
Subject:
Old Town Temeeula Entertainment Center
Proposal for Professional Services
WAT&G Project 1%1o. 94413
DearR~n:
As we discussed, the following describes our R~vised Proposal. for professional services for the
Master Planning and Pre-Concept Design of the Old Town Temecula Redevelopmeat Project and
Entertainment Center. This proposal responds ,o your comments and identifies fixed fees forthe
work that we will provide. As you are aware, we have already begun work on t~e project and
have accumulated professional fees and reimbursebias which we have already billed for services
through the end. of April.
Although much of the Scope of Work still rem~,ins somewhat unclear, we have attempted in this
proposal, to identify* what we understand is rceLui~d now and have made assumptions about what
will be required i~ the rumre. Should the Soup,; of Vv'ork be siteted in ene future to require'
additional work, the fees will be adjusted accordingly. For this Pro~sal, we have included time
expanded starting with my ~tst meetlng with Dave Hogan on 29 March 1994.
Meeting Allandance
It was apparent from our titst few meetings that continued attendance by WAT&O at the various
strategic planning work sessions and coordination meetings will be required continueBy
throughout the 90-120 day l~cD Phase. We have assumed our attendance will include
signi~omtt meetings where the key team member; are in attendance. In-house meetings will be
included in our other Senpus of Work defined bel6w. For this Proposal we have included S
meetings with a Principal and ~taffMember present.
'~260 Unixcrsity
Teh~phnn,, 714 574 8500
F~tc-imile '14 .574 RS50
IOd L:'e~ 8~SS~&S~t~:ON 3!L 9 · £ ~ ~:~I PS:~T P~,-CT-AI~W ........
Wimherly AllSam} Tong & Goo
.ItchElects and phmncr~
Mr. Roe Bradley
Page 2
13 May 1994
Map Develapmen'~
This work includes the in kial preparation of a comprehensive base map utiliting information
provided by the City and other consultints, to be used as 'ate basis for all future design
considerations. This map will be updated continuously as new information is provided. It will
include such information as, present and future highways and interchanges; streets, intersections
and bridges; property lines; new, existing, and historic buildings; flood information; land use
districts; civic and community buildings; present and future parking areas, etc. The Base Map
will be drawn at 1;100 scale.
Pro?ramlRj/1g..Feasibili~ Asses,~ment. and Strategic Planntn~ Phn~e
This work includes the review, comment end dc, velopment of the architectural program(s) for the
various project components including Zcv Bu~man's entefiainment projects; Gene Hancock's
hotel and retail projects; dud the various miscellaneous project elements such as the, retail, food
& beverage, etc., within the Old Town area. We will meet wi~ the various consultants including
the environmental, trafrtc, market feasibility anti City agencies to provide strategic planning
recommendations, clari~ information about the. project program Ca), assist in developing the
project doscription, and establish project phasiug ekerestOres. [n addition. WAT&G will provide
our expertise in assisting the team with feasibility assessment, overall strategic planning and
product assessment of the viable options to con,ider for the entertainment, reail and food &
beverage facilities. This will result in a written report describing our recommendations. We will
prepare an existing lot and structures inventory and appraisal, identifying the assessors parcel
number and street address of the lot, esoh build inB's current use, condition and viabllity relative
to the proposed project. The results oftbeef assesmania will be utilized in the development of
the Mastcr Plan and various Pre.Concep( Desig~ts.
PlannlnE Phse~
This Phase includes the development of numerc,us (3-4) Muter Planning Schemes tbr
consideration by the project team. It wfil ~nclude the identification of the various project
elements anticipated by Z. ev Buffman, Gene Hancock, and others identified in the Plopturning
Phase described above. R will also respond to Ihe City's Specific Plan, which identifies existing
historic and other structure~, establishes certain de, sip and planning guidelines, and new
circulation mutes. It will identify proposed periling areas and establish esti~nates of total parking
quantities proposed, in addition to proposed cimulation systems for pedestrian, vehicular. and
thented transportation modes, etc.
Wireherb- AHisnn 'l~m~ & Goo
Mr, Ron Bradley
Page 3
13 May 1994
As the Master Plan devalops, scale and massinto'. of each project component will be established.
WATIZG will coordinate with the City engineering or planning departments, as required. This
Phase will result in the creation of 3-4 Site PIrate of the TRC District, the arena site area and
adjacent significant elements of the Old Town/~rea pertinent to this project. The final drawings
will be at 1:100 scale.
We propose to perform our services per the foll,~wing Fixed Fee Schedule. The fees are based
on the startlag hours projected. Additional timt: required or adjustments in the Scope would be
on a Timc~ and Materials basis, per the attached Discounted Rourly Billing Pate Schedule. We
estimate that the work described above, whioh i~ associated with Gone Hancock's Hotels and
hotel related retail, encompasses approximately 10% of our total tees described below.
PHASE ~.~TTMATED t~OURS E~
Meeting Attendanoe - Rourly
Base Map Development
Programming. Feasibility Assessment
attd Strategic Planning
Master Planning
80 S9,500 (BudSet)
75 S~,620
45 S8,000
245 :$25,000
In addition to our professional fees, reimbursable expenses suoh as reproductions, CADD plots,
photos, mounting and framing, graphics ooordi.ation, renderings, models and mock-ups, long
distance communications, postage and hsndling. air travel, auto mileage, hotel and tab. ted
expenses, etc., incurred in the interest of this prc,ject by WATx'G staff and our consultants, will
be billed at 1.I times ~ctual cost At this time, we estimate the relmbursebles forthe project will
total approximately $6,500.
Payments on all services and reimbursables ue ,t.ue to WAT&G within 30 (thirty) days of
invoice. An interest charge of 1% per month will'be added to all payments made alter the 30
(thirty) d~v period.
Wim|,erly Allison ~mt~ & Gee
.4rrhite~ts and
Mr. leon Brsdle!t
13 May 1994
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal. We look forward to continuing our
efforts on the projact. Pleasa let me know ify0n have any questions regarding the
aforementioned.
Sincerely,
Michael R. Paneft, AIA
Vice President
Attachment \ Dis~ounted T~ourly Billing Pate S,:hedule
Zev Buffme
Marilyn Wbisenand
Michael M- S, Cltun
Acceptance:
City of Temeculn
Data
WAT&G Ntwport Beach
TEMECULA ENTERTAINMENT CEN FER
WAT&G PROJECT NO. 944 1-~
DISCOY~vI~TED HOURLY BILLING RATES
Principals and staff members wilt be billed ,.e the following hourly billing
Nous:
~ BILLf NO RATE
Principal $180.00
Senior Associate $135.00
Associate $100.00
Senior Sta~ $135.00
S taft Lovel I $100,00
Staff Level II $80.00
Staff Level Ill $65.00
Staff Level IV $50.00
Staff Lever V $35.00
Photography/(] raph ics $85.00
Marketing $I00,00
CAD Equipment Time $35.00
;
Overtime rates For staff(over 40 Ao~r~twr wee/c) us be 1.3 times billing ate.
These rates are subject to change from tsme to time.
Wiml.erl2t Allison 'l~,sg & Coo
Aftlutrt'r.~ nsld I'lant,rz,
May 2, 1994
VIA FACSIMlI,E (909/694-1999)
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
Dear Mr. Bradley:
RE: PROPOSAL TO PREPARE TWO (2) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSES OF THE
PROPOSED CITY OF TEMECULA-THE ZEV BUFFMAN GROUP
ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES IN OLD TOWN TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
Banon-Aschman Associates, Inc., is please to submit this letter proposal for your
consideration regarding the above-referenced development (hereinafter referred to as the
"Project"). We appreciate this opportunity to provide traffic-related services in the
processing of this development.
The basis for this proposal is as follows:
Information regarding the proposed Project received in "team" meetings on
March 21, March 23, and April 5, 1994;
A six-page narrative of the Project (i.e., "1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION"
prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates) received on April 19, 1994, from Tom
Dodson & Associates (refer to Attachment A);
A traffic impact analysis "scoping" meeting on April- 26, 1994, artended by
representatives of the City of Temecula; Caltrans; Barton-Aschman Associates,
Inc.; Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC); Riverside County
Transportation Depa~tujent (RCTD); and Valley Reseamh and Planning
Associates (consultant to RCTC);
Draft Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, City of Temecula, February 14, 1992;
and
wpd~q51340Uemecuie.pm
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 2
Draft Riverside County Transportation Commission Traffic Impdct Analysis
Report Guidelines, June 23, 1993.
With respect to the latter two items, it should be noted that certain variations from these
draft guidelines are proposed herein based upon input and direction received during the
aforementioned "scoping" meeting on March 26, 1994, and from the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) on April 29, 1994. It is Barton-Aschman's
understanding that the scope of services proposed herein includes those services required
to satisfy the needs of the public agencies responsible for reviewing and approving this
Projec~
We have subdivided our proposal into the following sections:
Understanding of the Project;
Scope of Services;
Time of Performance;
Cost of Services;
Method of Payment; and
Authorization of Proceed.
Each of these is discussed below.
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
Both within and directly west of the City of Temecula's adopted Old Town Temecula
Specific Plan area is proposed the development of a variety of entertainment-related
facilities. These facilities will be constructed by the City of Temecula in cooperation with
The Zev Buffman Group, Inc. CI'ZBG). With the exception of one hotel, the entire Project
is proposed for completion in 1996.
A traffic impact analysis (TiA) is required to determine if any adverse impacts on the area
transportation system will result due to the Project's vehicular trip generation. In fact, two
such studies are required: one addressing the requirements of the City of Temecula, and a
second addressing the requirements of the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of
RCTC. This proposal addresses both of these traffic impact analyses.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
As cited above, two traffic impact analyses will be prepared, with the results of each to be
summarized in a separate document. One analysis will address the RCTC's requirements
] $ARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIAIE$, INC. efx:f~Sf340~temecule.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 3
for compliance with CMP Land Use Coordination. The second analysis will address the
City of Temecula's traffic impact requirements. The scope of services for each analysis is
present~cl below.
RCTC/CMP Traffic Impact Analysis
Based upon direction and input received from RCTC; Valley' Research and Plsnnlng
Associates (consultant to RCTC); and SCAG's Inland Empire Office, the following
assumptions will be utilized and tasks completed:
1. The study area will consist of the following four CMP segments/links:
a. SR-79 (South) immediately east of 1-15;
b. 1-15 immediately south of SR-79 (South);
c. 1-15 between Rancho California Road and SR-79 (South); and
d. 1-15 immediately north of Rancho California Road.
2. The time period of analysis will be the weekday evening peak hour occurring
between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM.
3. In conjunction with Items 1 and 2 above, the following traffic scenarios will be
analyzed:
a. Existing (1994);
b. 1996 assuming no Project development;
c. 1996 assuming pardal Project completion, i.e., all Project components with the
exception of one hotel;
d. 20]0 assuming no Project development; and
e. 2010 assuming fu//Project completior~.
4. With respect to the five traffic scenarios included in Item 3 above, the following
parameters and methodologies will apply:
] BARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpdtJSf340ttwnead~.pro
M~Ronald E. Bradley
May2,1994
Page 4
a. Existing (1994)
(1)
1994 directional traffic volumes will be obtained from RCTC. These
volumes will be either actual 1994 volumes or volumes collected in a
prior year(s) and factored by Barton-Aschman to 1994 (utilizing a growth
factor(s) supplied by RCTC or SCAG);
b. 1996 Without Project
(1)
The 1994 volumes described in Item 4.a above will be factored by
Barton-Aschman to 1996 utilizing a growth factor(s) obtained from
RCTC or SCAG;
1996 With (Partial) Project
(1)
Based upon 1996 Project trip generation and distribution data jointly
developed by Barton-Aschman, the City of Temecula, and TZBG,
assignments of 1996 Project-generated traffic will be made to the four
study segments/links. In order to obtain "1996 With Project" volumes,
the 1996 Project traffic volumes will be superimposed directly upon the
1996 non-Project volumes described in Item 4.b above;
d. 2010 Without Project
(1)
2010 directional volumes will be obtained from SCAG. If necessary,
these volumes will be "modified" by Barton-Aschman to reflect the
elimination of trips generated by those land uses (assumed in SCAG's
2010 forecast) which will be "replaced" with Project land uses. As
discussed and confirmed with SCAG, this reduction will be done
manually, not via the SCAG (or any other) travel demand model. The
number of trips to be eliminated will be obtained from SCAG;
e. 2010 With (Full) Project
(1)
Based upon 2010 Project trip generation and distribution data jointly
developed by Banon-Aschman; the City of Temecula, and TZBG,
assignments of 2010 Project-generated traffic will be made to the four
study segments/links. In order to obtain "2010 With Project" volumes,
the 2010 Pwject traffic will be superimposed directly upon the manually-
adjusted 2010 non-Project volumes described in Item 4.d above.
] BARTON-ASCHMAN
AS$OCIA'I~$, INC. wpa'1951340~tewecui.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page $
S. Level-of-service analyses for the five traffic scenarios in Item 3 above will be
conducted utilizing CMP criteria established by RCTC. If adverse impacts are
projected due to Project-generated traffic, a program of mitigation will be
recommended.
6. The results of Items I through 5 above will be summarized in a traffic impact
analysis report. Five copies will be submitted to the .City of Temecula for its use
and distribution.
City of Ternecula Traffic Impact Analysis
Based upon direction and input received from the City of Temecu]a, the fo]lowing
assumptions will be utilized and tasks completed:
1. The study area will consist of the following nine intersections:
a. Rancho California Road-Business Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive;
b. Rancho California Road-Diaz Road;
c. Rancho California Road-Front Street;
d. Rancho California Road-l-15 South ramps;
e. Rancho California Road-I-IS North ramps;
f. Front Street-Moreno Road;
g. Front Street-Santiago Road;
h. SR-79 (South)-I-15 North ramps; and
i. SR-79 (South)-I-l~ South ramps.
2. The time periods of analysis will be the 1994 and 1996 weekday evening peak hour
occurring between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM; :the 1994 and 1996 Saturday peak hour (the
precise hour to be determined as part of this analysis); and the weekday. 24-hour
period occurring with General Plan Buildout.
] BARTON-A$CHMAN
A$$OCIAIES, INC. wpdt9513401temecu/a,pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 6
In conjunction with Items 1 and 2 above, the following traffic scenarios will be
analyzed:
a. Existing (1994); :
b. 1996 assuming no Project development;
1996 assuming partial Project completion, i.e., all Project components with the
exception of one hotel;
d. General Plan Buildout assuming no Project; and
e. General Plan Buildout assuming full Project completion.
With respect to the five traffic scenarios included in Item 3 above, the following
parameters and methodologies will apply:
a, Existing (1994)
(i)
Weekday evening peak-hour turning-movement traffic counts will be
conducted by Banon-Aschman at the nine study intersections between
4:00 PM and 6:00 PM;
(2)
In order to establish the "design" hour on Saturday, a 24-hour traffic
count (summarized in 15-minute intervals) will be conducted on a
Saturday on Rancho California Road between Front Street and 1-15.
Further, a Saturday Project trip generation analysis on an hourly basis
will be jointly developed by Banon-Aschman, the City of Temecula, and
TZBG. Based upon the 24-hour traffic count data on Rancho California
Road and the Saturday Project trip generation, the combined
peak/"design" hour of 1994 non-Project and 1996 Project traffic will be
determined. Once this Saturday "design" hour has been identified, two-
hour turning-movement counts will be conducted on Saturday by Barton-
Aschman at the nine study intersections (beginning 30 minutes before and
ending 30 minutes after the "design" hour previously identified);
t'~ $&RTON*A$C:HMAN
A~OC:IA~S, INC.
wpcl1951bl& pto
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 7
b. 1996 Without Project
(1)
The 1994 volumes described in Item 4.a above will be factored by
Barton~Aschman to 1996 utilizing a growth factor(s) obtained from the
City of Temecula;
c. 1996 With (Partial) Project
(1)
Based upon 1996 Project trip generation and distribution data jointly
developed by Barton-Aschman, the City of Temecula and TZBG,
assignments of 1996 Project-generated traffic will be made to the nine
study intersections. The peak-hour assignments of weekday and Saturday
Project traffic volumes will assume, at minimum, the circulation system
improvements cited in Section 1.3.B of "1.0 PROJECT DESCRIYrION,"
Tom Dodson & Associates (refer to Attachment A). (Note: Any
additional 1996 improvements identified for implementation by the City
of Temecula also will be included.) In order to obtain "1996 with
Project" volumes, the 1996 Project traffic will be superimposed directly
upon the 1996 non-Project volumes described in Item 4.b above. (Note:
If the 1996 circulation system improvements could cause a
"reassignment" of 1996 non-Project traffic, a manual reassiL2nment of said
volumes will be made by Banon-Aschrnan. Such a reassignment will be
estimated based upon the existing volumes at the nine study intersections
and perceived traffic patterns in the area.);
d. General Plan Buildout Without Project
(1)
General Plan Buildout weekday 24-hour volumes will be obtained from
the City of Temecula. These volumes will be provided on a roadway
segment/link basis in a format similar to that illustrated in Attachment B,
Exhibit Y. The precise segments/links will include the roadway
segments/links "connecting" the nine study intersections and any others
deemed necessary by the City of Temecula.
General Han Buildout With (Pull) Project :
(1) Based upon the roadway system assumed for "General Plan Buildout
Without Project" (refer to Item 4.d above), Banon-Aschman will
manually assign weekday 24-hour Project volumes to the roadway
segments/links utilized in Item 4.d above. These assignments of Project
L~ IARTON-ASCHMAN
A$$OC~AI~$, INC.
epd~5134iNemecule.l~o
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 8
traffic will be based upon Project trip generation and distribution data
joinfly developed by Barton-Aschman, the City of Temecula, and TZ, BG.
In order to obtain "General Plan Buildout With Project" volumes, the fur
Project traffic volumes will be superimposed directly upon the General
Plan Buildout non-Project volumes described in Item 4.d above.
Level-of-service analyses for the five traffic scenarios in Item 3 above will be
conducted utilizing City of Temecula criteria. This will involve intersection capacity
calculations for the 1994 and 1996 weekday and Saturday peak hours. With respect
to the General Plan Buildout scenarios, segment/link capacity calculations on a
weekday 24-hour basis will be conducted in a format similar to that illustrated in
Attachment B, Exhibit Z. For all scenarios, if adverse impacts are projected due to
Project-generated traffic, a program of mitigation will be recommended.
The results of Items 1 through 5 will be summarized in a traffic impact analysis
report Five copies will be submitted to the City of Temecula for its use and
distribution.
Meetings
Meetings will be artended at the request of the City of Temecula and/or T'ZBG. These
could include "team" meetings, public hearings, "work" sessions, etc.
To date, Barton-Aschman has attended three meetings at the request of the City of
Temecula and/or TZBG. These occurred on March 21, March 23, and April 5, 1994. In
addition, four additional "team" meetings have been scheduled in May-June 1994 (per Mr.
David Hogan on April 29, 1994). Considering public hearings also will be required, it is
therefore conceivable 'that 10 (+) meetings ultimately will be requested of Barton-
Aschman.
Additional Services
It is conceivable that services in addition to those explicitly cited above will be required of
Barton-Aschman. Typical examples could include the conduct of additional technical
studies; responding to comments concerning the traffic reports; and providing assistance
during the environmental review process. We'will comply as required to the greatest
degree possible.
] BARTON-A$CHMAN
ASSOCIA'i'ES, INC. wpdt9513401temecule,pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 9
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Excluding 'Meetings" and "Additional Services,'' the "Scope of Services'' delineated
'herein will be completed within approximately four weeks following Barton-Aschman's
receipt of (a) the final Project description, (b) approval by the City of Temecula of the
Project trip generation and distribution, (c) all traffic data described herein from the City
of Temecula, RCI'C, and SCAG, and (d) formal authorization to proceed.
COST OF SERVICES
All services will be completed on a time-and-materials basis utilizing staff rates in effect
at the time of performance, plus reimbursement (at cost) for all directly related expenses.
All services will be conducted by Barton-Aschman personnel with the exception of the
conduct of peak-hour traffic counts at the nine study intersections and the 24-hour count
on Rancho California Road. These counts will be conducted by Wiltec, a traffic data
collection firm located in Pasadena, California. Wiltec will serve as a subconsultant to
Banon-Aschman, and Wiltec's cost to conduct the counts will be $3,050.00.
Excluding "Meetings" and "Additional Services," the "Scope of Services'' delineated
above, including Wiltec's fee of $3,050.00, will be completed for a cost of $23,000.00 to
$24,000.00. We will not exceed $24,000.00 without receipt of client authorization. It is
explicitly noted that this cost estimate assumes that Barton-Aschman's receipt of all traffic
data described herein from the City of Temecula, RCTC, SCAG, and any other public
agency or associated consulting firm will occur at no charge to Barton-Asehman.
With respect to "Meetings,'' such services will'be charged on a straight time-and-expenses
basis, with staff time recorded "portal to portal." For the client's general budgeting
purposes, one three-hour meeting held in Temecula and attended by one Barton-Aschman
senior-level staff member would cost $1,000.00 (+). Therefore, if 10 such meetings
(averaging three hours per meeting) were ultimately requested by the City of Temecula
and/or TZBG (as discussed previously herein), a cost for meetings of $10,000.00 (+)
would result.
With respect to "Additional Services," a cost of services should be determined at the time
of request.
] BAIR/ON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Page 10
METHOD OF PAYMENT
Billings for services will be submitted on a four-week basis and are duc and payable upon
.receipt. Balances on invoices which remain unpaid after 30 days will accrue interest at
the rate of 1.5 percent pcr month. Payments due Barton~Aschman are noncontingent upon
Project approval or Project financing and arc Banon-Aschman's clicnt's responsibility.
Failure to submit payment within 30 days of invoice date shall be deemed sufficient
reason to "stop work" on the assignment until payment is received. Any resultant delay in
scheduled completion date is the full responsibility of the clicnL Further, in the even legal
proceedings are instituted to collect delinquent payments due Barton-Aschman, the client
will be responsible for court costs, expenses of collection, and reasonable attomcy's fees.
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
We are prepared to initiate work on this assignment upon receipt of a signed copy of this
Letter Agreement, thereby signifying client's full understanding and acceptance of the
terms and conditions hercin.
Again, wc thank you for considering Banon-Aschman in assisting in the approval and
dcvclopmcnt of your Project. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do
not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Thomas E. Mitchell, P.E
Vice President
ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY:
(Signature)
TEM/km
Attachments (A; B)
(Typed Name)
· , (Date)
Authorized to Execute Agreements for:
BARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpdt95134(Nemec~.pm
L0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1,1 Intrnductton
In ????, 1994 the CIty of Temecula adopted the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan which
. .establishes a vision for gniding the future development of the heart of Temealla, Old Towm
As slated in the Specific Plan "ltc purpose of this Specific p~n document is to assure the
systematic lmplemenlation d the General Plan....the document provides a comprehensive
plan for hnd use, development regulations, design guidelines, vehicular circula~on, parkin~
dovelopmcnt incentives and other related actions ei~ned at implementin2 the I~oah and
objectives set forth in the General Plan.' The City, in cooperation with MAr. Zev Buffre=m;
has ideniiiied a suite of enterts;~went facilities that are proposed for developmeat
implement a ponlon of the Specific Plan. The proposed facilities will be considered in
initial Study which will provide the City with the environmenTAl information it needs in
order to deterv~t-e whether an Environmental Impact Report (KIR) must be prepared
~omply with the California Enviro-,~enlal Clnlaliry Act (CEQA).
1 .~ PX:0ject T ~cation
The Old Town Specific Plan encompasses the area between ttancho Cali/ornla Road and
Santiago Road flint S~eet on the north and south, respectively and the I-IS Freeway on
the cast, and essentially Pujol on the west. An additional area is being included as part of
the proposed project, south d Pujol Street The topographic map location of the rite is
shown on the Temecula 7~' topographic map. Since ,~t area is part of an old rancho it
has nol been assigned section numbers. The cadastral location is La~:itude ~3· 2.8' North and.
Longitude 117· 0~' West. The regional location is shown in Figure 1-1 and the area location
and Wpography are shown in Fi~.tre 2 which was abstracted from the Mundeta and
Tcmecula 7,~' topography maps,
1.~ PrOject Charac?eH.~li~
The proposed projecl encompasses a variety 0fstructures, activity areas, parIcing areas and
circulation system modifications, and hoteh. An estimated total of ten new occ~piablc
mucturcs are proposed for construction and as many as two parld_~E structures may be
constructed. The entenaimucnt structures arc dcsiXned to hnplemcnt the central
enterL~!_~ent concept of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP). Three of the structures (the
Wild Wen Arena and the two hotels) are located outside of the OTSP and ~ either
feqllire incitlsion in the Specific Plan area or will require adoption of · separate speclfic
plan In accord with the existing City Genersl Plan requirements for the area. All of these
facilities wgl be reviewed for adverse impacts from approvin2, conmuctinS and operalin2
them as outlined in the followin2 discussion .of project characteristics.
ATTACHMENT /
1,3~. Entertainment Facilities
The City, in cooperation with Mr. Zev Buffman, proposes to construct Zhe followin~
C&bsret Tl~tru: Two cabaret thMtres a~ FopNed to be )ocat~d h the Spe~; PL~ core area at
I~e proposed location shown m FIgure 3. Xach gabtrgt is proposed to conaln about X6.O00 square
(f~ ~ arm on · 13,000 ~ foot~mt. The sU-dmu~ d !~ apl~,~,-ttdy 2~ fe~t ht/a and wgl provld=
asb~le storys cz~u.k Ths footl~nt oft~buD~ahob~?.O(X}~. v-ehsaloonw~bs
des;ned to uterta~ appr~st~y 350 penons, ~ st ~ables and a~ut 100 st the bar or zdj;,.-,,t arcs.
A smxU sfaS~ ~, b~ provided for typical b~ ~uteftsbua~:~ s~ch M dancing ~lk
shootouts lind other ~ut~r~-T,,m~nt ~ I~ proNAaut. 'Fne salooos wil b~ open from .q to Lt PM on
Monday thru T~urshy; open from 4 to mldniZht on Frida~ open trom noon to
and froan noon to IX I'M,. Typical wuter~ Eue w~ be prc~dr.d for patrons and waiter/waltreu
Opera House: An opo,a hous~ is proposed to be lo~ated b the Spedt~ Pla~ core ares at the proposed
lo~io~ shown on Figure 3. The ope~ house is proposed to b~ · two szor2e smu:ture vdtb the
proscenlu~ :ppro~ately ~0 feet hi2l~ Ti~ opera house is e~ecxed to enc:mze.-~,t ~ f~ ~ slxt~
with · footprint or' appxox~exely 23,[XX~, ]~xt~ztlteg tenth:ls clpacl~ qeg] be ~.,400 persoils Oil thg first
floor and 800 :ca'* Jn the bakony. Seagrit throuShom b ~ m -~-,;*' ~re~ ~ m~
ud rs~o ~o ~ ~u~ appr~ate~ ~ ~ ~r~e ~ o~ ho~ ~ b ud~pat~ ~t ~e
o~ra ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~r w~ ~c fo~o~ ~rf~ s~ ~
Showboat: A wuIern showboat whh · ',-.h,o' and r,.lm~room h proposed to 1~ located h the Specific
2
· SENT BY:TOM DQDSON & AS$0~ | 4-19-94 | 1:15Pi; ~148898050- 18185850722;i 4
6.
Wid West Arems: A 4,800 sea tent dcslKnad wi~ west srene the will be ,;,,m,;. to Burro BlIPs
",axis western X~ show is proposed to be located Just south of Phn c~e area et the pr~ixssed
hcad{~l show= on F~u'= 3. Th~ ~ u outdoor/'mdoor faci,'llty dat w~ oZ~ram aB ye4r but lay= a ~6
pol~ will raise the height o~ the fac~'ty to 7.~0 fur. It wgl be contracted on a four-acre pad, During
themhJihscasonitisa4tlmazmithatthreeshowlw'~]be~parfonne. dpefw·ek(4~lhows).~m,~
m Friday, Sszurday ud Sunday. Dtu~n2 the r~mtinder d the year (~ w~) two shows per ~ are
ezl~,ctod to bc p~rformed, primarily o~ the we~.n~ Tbe performances ~ be hela aI ~ 2 PM
or7PMonaitvenday. Thewildwef~pcrformancusfeaxp~edtoocmrovura:2.~houfpezlod.
Food and drlk ~ be provided, v:ixh · VIP sec~oo pr~ded with · nandid bar and food ordff
sorvi~. The main porformancs wFd be · wild we. st show v,~ 2ttut tides, shrp shoo·m, ore.
Additional shows would include big coxtarry and wutorn m:s appeazi2 in cm~c~% food and wine
crJcbredoi reJat. d to the local wine industry and rodeos. The factty will pfovld~ · venuc for m'butu
to Feat wutern heroes or to thm~ who conm~utsd to w, st~r~ k~e.
u ,,,-,,y ~ u pos~'ble w~out 2et~g 'xamo,,~d' from emnpegdon. The area vail be fenced but
sfil be ~ '/ex'bla to an aud~uos surrountn2 the c~mpett~on ares. People ~ bs ·ble to root for
,l, ; [. favorite pe~. Ten people can lartlclpata in uc~ fiv~ mh~ut~ tr~p and ac~u ~ be lx~e~ on
a ~ r2c=ronlc bc~d. N.V'~utn, ~ Set pHz~
Hotels: Tw~ ,-ajar hotok src proposed for cons~;u~lon in the vt~-;'7 of the v~d w~ srene xt ·be
proposed locsfion shovm on Fz2ure 3. This aru h OuLSide the curr~nt bounds.,"~ of ~ OTSP and wi
haw to bc broug~ into t.~ OT~P or addre. s~! h, · separate specific plan. One betel h proposed to
h: four stories In be:x2~ and prov~d~ a total of 3~ room~ A Z.7 tare pad wi be provided for thh
h~ w1';_'r;~ is proposed to e~mtL~. appro~nately 141,000 f'~ of space_ The P. cond hotel is proposed
to be · six story arucmre with 400 rooms and abo~ l~0.000 a~ on a .;,~., 57 ~ ~.d. 'r'u k~ais
at· fore~ut to corral apprclmately 100,0G0 ft~ of relaxed reta~ space.
The entertainment f-_,'"_"je4 are utlcipced to be consumezeal ud opened concurrently in 3996 i~ spproved by
th~ ~. It ~s ss~cipmted thsz the hotels ~ b~ pbued ~ o~o fsc~y opened in ~ and s~mther m few 3m
a/let. The entc~.t-,,,ent facKfir~es are bebl dcslgned to operate at a ~0% tuual Wn~-,,tion rate., with occtfionsl
tncliv~utl performmum being fully _l~ee_ked. An ,,dmbhtretion and tlck=t-vtshar center wlal b~. incorparatcd into
thc abov~ stn~t~zu, b'.st the tact location Of these fsn'fitt~ hu no( yet been det~-mincd.
Circulation System Improvements
:In order to ecco,-~modste the trn4~¢ generated by the entertainment and hotel facilities
outlined above, the City hu identical · range of circulation and parking system
improvements to enhance traffic flow wt?~;,, the OTSP area msd the area to the southwest
where the arena and hotels w~l be located. These improvements are ou~t~ed below and
the locations of each of these improvements is shown on Figure 4.
h scr. ordauee with the lioadway Improvememst ond Build-out Recnmmc~dallom of the OTIP, Ss.uf:~o
(Fsrsz Su-eet) will be reconstruczed from at least Front Street south to the v~stern bypss~ Tiffs
include consmaalon of a brldp o~r Mm'rlcta Cree3c (u 88 feet wide secondm7 road).
Sixth $tree~ may be Improved in accordsace with the OTSP recommendations. It wo~d be enaendcd
so~h to the P~ol S~re~/Valdu Avenue interscion. A new bridge v~uld be required to ass
Vsldez Avenue ~ be "+ended from ltencho _t~J;romla to Pujol Stree~ inel,~l.%e sU.a{eJ,,.,,;-5 the
kligm:ment to allow b~zer norrt south trs~c flow. The inzerseerl~n
load ud Vslda Avenue would be rcvlsed to mt~ Diaz Xosd/Vsl~z Avenue a ttrou~h rout.
]~-mor insprove~-,t_.~ s~ u xldewalks and cttrbs will be instslled a~ong FroaZ $tree~ sou~h of Fast
Street.
The north bound off-ramp on dm 1.33 at Rucbo CalLfornls Rued w~ be _r~,~,eractnd to improve
tra~c flow throu2h this intcrMcfien.
Dm.~ major pe. rformenc~, the City wlU ctmslde~.en olgratlni alter~sgve of ~ Front $lreet in
Old Town end ~g trstT~ nonb tm S~comd Street to Merczdes ud ,z,,.,,,z to Sixzb Street or
Mortuo Koad to ~tersect Frout Strm on thc north s~de o~ Old Town. ,<ss'~SL,~,,]y, tra~c cln be
· - 4
- SENT BY:TON DODSON & AS$O~ ; 4-19-94 | 1:1~P~ | ~148898050"' 18185850~22;~ 6
dirnaed south to Pu.~ol/Valdu or the Western Bypass. Some road improvements ms), be ,.tde sloni
the Mcrcedu, Second Street and/or Sixth S~rcet/Morano Road alignments to hci~Itato trs~c flow in
thss~ arms, During me3or Cve4~ts the projr.~ wo,,~d include e v~U~ or errant enter-l,,,-enz s~vlt~s.
Some form d people movu syde'm ~ be insta~ed ~ong Main Street born Front Street to the
'Fbb anu]d include e themeal ,~u~le s~stem, ~cultr tr,-e;t system, horse drawn carts, or ·
p~ mover.
The ~-culstl,-- E,~tm ~'-,~'av~U I:~,a~ ~ ~ to adequate tc~ to
a~pr~te u de~ ~ ~e ~c s~ ~e ~bu~ b ~ Old T~ ~e ~ ~ ~a~ to
~.C P~g Fae~ties
A~ar cerci'al ev~uation the CiW h~s con~uded ~t cen~;;-ed p~ng on ~e p~pbe~
of ~e Old To~ ~ b~ sere ~e l~d ~e ~n~pt ~n~ed ~ ~e O~P. ~e fo~o~
fairies ~ proposed.
L
A two story (in bright) parici~g structure is proposed north of SL'~b Street. It Is udclpeted that 300
par~,,.e tpac~ w~ be Fovld~d in tl~ psr~;,,e strumu'e which is proposed to be located u shown on
Rguze 3. The pariS2 au'""ure Is proposed to have an apF^,~,,,az; 22,000 fi2 ~ootFinz' l~.ei~ll spac~
may be Inszslled on the 2xoud floor of tie lxv~-.e str~ctm-_
Parl~ug spsees stud/or ~ par~,,_- structure w~ be provided
;,,';~st~[ tis! 1.~00 ptr~.i:zg ~acu v.~ be provided for tie
~ ~,ted ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pro~d~ for ~ bot~ on
If requtrnzi, u overflow park~ area may be cez~ruaed adjacent to hjol Su'e~ Bar ~ proposed
A tott~ d 3~00 per~antut pc)titS ~,~, arc Foposed i'orbu,,~,,~on to support t~e projec~ ~',d t~e OTSP,
1.3.D Procedural Review Requirements
In order to cons~zct those facLMties ud improvements, the City must evaluate mad then
approve a m~ster conditional use permit and either an ame~ament to the Old Town Specific
:.Plan or a new specific plan for the area ctu'rcntiy not located within the Specific Plan. The
master conditional use permit for all of the improvements ~ allow future approvals based
upon review of individual plot plans for each of t~e proposed facilities or facilities submitted
in con~uncEion wizb each other. The environmental documentation being prepared for thk
project evaluates the individual project components and it is anticipated that no additional
envlro,~mental determinations will be required once the City melees a decision on the
proposed project. Individual building permits would be required prior to construction, but
as long as such permits conform to the design guidelines contained in the OTSP and the
Uniform Bullf~i,~g Code such permits are considered ministerial actions ullder the CI~QA.
1,4. Re~on~le A~enc~es
The proposed project wAIl sffea state highway and Interstate tight-of-way and Caltr.'n,~ will
have jurisdiction over hnprovcments wt,l~(~ these rights-o~-way. Therefore, Caltr~ will act
as a Responsa'ble Agency for the proposed prOject. The bridge croc~b~ over Murrieta
Creek ~ require the City to obtain a 1603 'StreAm_ Alteration A~reement from the
Departmen! of Fish and Game CDFG). Also, it is possible that a permit to take an listed
species (the California Gnatcatcher) will have to be obtained from DFO. This permit is
termed as '2081' permit and it is issued under the California Endangered Species Act
(CESA). DFG will serve as a Respons~le Agency under the CEQA. At this time it does
not appear that any air or water permits will be required for this prOject. No other State
agencies have been idemifiod from which permits my be required.
PermiZx will be required from the Corps of Englneers for ins,,ll{~ the bridges across
Mere'iota Creek (Section 404 Permit). The possibility of affecting the Gutcatcher means
that it may be necessary to obt,1~ a 'mice' permit from the U. 8. Fish and Wildltfe~-~ervico
(FWS). If the consultation for the take permit is conducted through the Corps. it will be
conducted under ~ection 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act CESA). If the
consultativn is conducted by the City directly with the FWS, a Section 10 consultation ~
ensue. Because circulation system improvements are proposed to be made witl~ the
Interstate 15 fight-d-way, the Federal Highway Ad~b~tslration (FI-IA). must be consulted
and permits obt~necl for these Insprover~cnts. No other federal agencies have been
identified from which permits may be required.
The Initial Srady Environmental C:hccklist Form follows this prOject description. It contains
questions regarding potential impacts of the project for 20 envtro~,~ental issues.
Substantiating data arc provided to support the conclusions contained in the Checklist Form.
This supporting data is provided for all Checldtst issues, regardless of whether they have
been checked 'Yes', *Maybe', of 'No', The environmental setting is provided in the
pertinent section of the substantiating disatssion for each issue, Mitigation measures and
references are a~so cited in each section and mitigation measures are compiled for the whole
documem following the Mandalory Findings section o£ the Check. list. The Environmental
Cheat Form begins on the page following the attached figures,
6
BUILDOUT A VERA GE D AlL Y TRAFFIC
24. ;j~tCt~O
I I~ARAy14
I - .~
MERCEZ)ES ST.
190
LECEND:
7 - V[HICI.,[S pFR DAY (lO00'S)
SOURCE: W1L.BUR SMITH ASSOCIATr_,S
OLD TOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN EVALUATION
Temecula, California
142
EXHIBIT Y
ATTACHMENT
f
BUILDOUT VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIOS
L
.59
,59
t~C~O
.34 .43
BALOARAY
.06
2¢
.69
LEGEND:
,65 -- VOLUME--TO-CAPACIfY RATIO
SOURCE WlI,~UR SMITH ASSOCIATES
MERCEDE~ 5'T.
.28
I
i
I
i
!
i
I
!
i
!
1
OLD TOWN TEMECULA
O SPECIFIC PLAN EVALUATION [
Temecula, California
sx~zsx~ z