HomeMy WebLinkAbout080195 RDA AgendaAGENDA
CITY OF TEMECULA
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA CITY HALL - MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43174 Business Park Drive
August 1, 1995 - 6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Dallas Gray presiding.
Flag Salute
Agency Member Walton
ROLL CALL: Committee
Members: Bridges, Gray, Jenkins, Reed, Walton
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1 ADDroyal of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 11, 1995.
2 Prooosed Purchase and Resale of the Rancho West Apartments
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Review and provide comments on the purchase of Rancho West Apartments
from the Resolution Trust Corporation for a total of $2,255,00; and
2.2
Review and provide comments on the subsequent resale of the project to
Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC) for operation as an affordable
housing project in perpetuity.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
21~m~d~/O71OgE,fdc 1 07/24/96
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 5, 1995, 6:30 PM, Temecula City Hall, Main Conference
Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
ITEM NO. I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN
REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
JULY 11, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula 01d Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee
was called to order on Monday, July 11, 1995, 6:30 PM at Temecula City Hall Main
Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Gray
presiding.
PRESENT: 5
COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Bridges, Gray, Jenkins,
Walton, Reed
ABSENT: 0 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: None
Also present were Associate Planner David Hogan and Joan Price, Recording Secretary.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
ADDrOYal Of Minutes
It was moved by Committee Member Bridges, seconded by Committee
Member Jenkins to approve the minutes of June 6, 1995.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Bridges, Gray, Jenkins,
Walton, Reed
NOES: 0 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: None
1996-2000 Capital Imorovement Proqram
Associate Planner Dave Hogan presented the Capital Improvement Program
for FY 1996-2000 which includes sixty-three projects to be funded.
Included are 24 infrastructure projects; the 1-15 and Highway 79-South
interchange; Margarita/Winchester Road project; and the realignment of Diaz
west of Moraga. A new project included in the Old Town area is the storm
drain improvement at Sixth Street and Third Street.
Minutes.rdc\O?l195
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE JULY 11o 1995
Committee Member Reed directed the following questions to staff:
"Were the funds to purchase the Sixth Street parking lot from
the General Fund, or the RDA?" Planner Hogan responded that
it was expended from the General Fund to be reimbursed by
the RDA.
"Is a lO-inch sewer line large enough for Old Town?" Planner
Hogan responded that the engineers are entrusted with the
calculations for the adequacy of the service and that the CIP
estimates are for the purpose of budgeting.
"Why is Murrieta Creek listed as a Priority Two?" Planner
Hogan responded that the project will be funded by the Flood
Control District.
She indicated concern with the costs estimated for the parking
area at Sixth street. Planner Hogan responded that the figures
represent typical construction costs and are not exact.
Committee Member Jenkins directed the following questions to staff:
"What is the schedule on the construction for the sewer line?"
Planner Hogan responded that it is reasonable to assume
completion in 6-7 months. Dave Hogan also reported that the
First Street bridge, the sewer line and the water lines are
included in the design phase.
"Is the Streetscape to include undergrounded utilities?"
Planner Hogan responded that the decision to underground
utilities has not been made.
Committee Member Gray expressed concern on the maintenance yard lease
costs?
Associate Planner Hogan asked Committee Members if they would like to
send comments to the City Council.
Committee Member Jenkins recommended the Council consider the Flood
Control District Project to be a Priority One, and that the Flood Control
District be responsible for the costs.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Associate Planner Dave Hogan distributed written responses from the
Executive Director to the questions posed by the Committee at the June 6,
Minutes.rdc\071195
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENTADVISORY COMMITTEE
JULY 11. 1995
meeting. These included the Stipulated Judgement, status on traffic and park
studies, the lease for the Temecula Shuttle, the balance of the CIP (which is
14.9 million dollars) and the grant funded by the RDA, (which was in the
amount of $50,000 in February 1992, to California Curves for building re-
construction to comply with earthquake safety standards).
COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion for adjournment was made by Committee Member Bridges, seconded by
Committee Member Jenkins at 7:20 PM and unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee will be held
on Tuesday, August 1,1995, 6:30 PM, Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174
Business Park Drive, Temecula, Californra.
Minutes.rdc\071195 _3
ITEM NO. 2
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Members of the Redevelopment Advisory Committee
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
August 1, 1995
Proposed Purchase and Resale of Rancho West Apartments
PREPARED BY: Marilyn Whisenand, Redevelopment Director
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee review and provide
comments on the following:
(1) The purchase of Rancho West Apartments from the Resolution Trust
Corporation for a total of 92,255,000; and,
(2)
The subsequent resale of the project to Coachella Valley Housing Coalition
(CVHC) for operation as an affordable housing project in perpetuity.
BACKGROUND:
On March 28, 1995, a report on this project was discussed with the City Council/Agency in
Closed Session (Government Code Section 54956.8). Following the Closed Session
discussion, direction was given to the Agency's negotiator to execute a Letter of Intent to
purchase Rancho West Apartments from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and to enter
into negotiations with the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC) to act as ultimate owner
and operator of the project.
During the last sixty days, Agency staff and consultants have performed due diligence on the
Rancho West Apartments in order to determine the validity of the price established by RTC's
latest valuation of 92,734,314. A review of current operating expenses and income, vacancy
factors affecting the project, and the project's physical condition, along with consultation with
CVHC the ultimate owner of the project, has resulted in a recommendation to offer a total of
~2,255,000for the purchase of the property.
If the Agency approves the recommended purchase price and the RTC accepts the offer, it is
proposed that the property would be purchased and immediately resold to the Coachella Valley
Housing Coalition who would operate the affordable housing project in perpetuity.
R:\REDEV\RANCHO.WST 7/24/95 klb 1
AFFORDABILITY PARAMETERS:
Affordability restrictions would be placed on the property which provide rentals affordable to
households earning no more than 50% of median income for 43 units and rentals affordable
to households earning no more than 80% of median income for a total of 105 units. Two
units would be operated as transitional/emergency housing units. Emergency housing units
would be provided for a temporary period for households who are without housing or about
to be without housing only for a temporary period until permanent housing accommodations
can be found.
Based on existing income standards, rents resulting from affordability restrictions will range
from approximately (~327 to 9455 for one bedroom units and from 9419 to 9500 for two
bedroom units. Current market rents within the project are reported of 9455 per month for
one bedrooms and 9500 per month for two bedrooms.
FINANCING:
RTC will provide Coachella Valley Housing Coalition with 95% financing for the project at
11.25% interest. This "bridge loan" can be refinanced with no penalty at a future point in
time. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency will receive a "public servicing fee" of 5% for
facilitating the purchase of the property and ultimate resale to Coachella Valley Housing
Coalition. This servicing fee will be passed on to CVHC to provide the necessary 5% down
payment.
Additional funds will be required for capital improvements to the project, operating reserves,
replacement reserves, and other acquisition expenses. These expenses totaling 9240,300will
be funded by a County HOME Grant of 9150,000 and RDA Housing Set Aside Funds of
990,300.
In order to provide financial support for the transitional housing program and maintain
affordability levels at the standards required by the RDA, a maximum financial support is
proposed from RDA Housing Funds of 9100,000 per year for the first 3 years of project
operation. The amount of actual subsidy provided will depend on annual verification of the
project's operating pro forma. After the initial 3 year rent up period, it is expected that project
income will completely support operational costs.
The attached income and expense pro forma outlines the proposed financing for the project
and the source and application of funds,
Attachments:
1. Income and Expense Pro Forma - Page 3
R:\REDEV\RANCHO.WST 7/24/95 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
R:%REDEV\RANCHO.WST 7/24/96 klb 3
JUL-20-95 THU 15:06
O.V. BOOSIN6 OOAUTION
FRX NO. 6193426466
P. 02
RTC 95% Loan: $2,142,250
' Rate: 113,5
Term: 30 ym
Tqrtal PrOjects Costs:, $2,~AI5 300
~0 E '$ 90,300
C~unty H M, - $ 150,000
RTC Public 8er, $ 1!2,750
RTC Mort. - $2.t42.250
Total -$2~496,30g
Annual Qebt Service: $249,685
RTC Required Debt ServiCe Cove~ge: 'f .t7%
Acquisition Coat: $2.255,000
RTC Loan - $2,142,250
5% Down -$ 112,750
Refrigerators - $ 60,000
Op. Reserves · $ t5,000
Replsc. Reset. -$ 50~000
Acqu. Expen.- $ 25,000
PjTC Monitoring4 . 7,500
Capitol imp. - $ ,82.800 (See Note
Total - $2,495,300
NOte #1: Projected ExDer~es
t. Adm~istratlve (c~ntrac~ management,
' n~rk~t~ng, audit, legal, office expense) $ 82,5~)0 *
1
2, Saledes and Sane~Ls $ ;~8,5~)0 *
3. Maintenance (supplies, grounds.
pajnfing, pest, et~.) $ 85,0~)0 *
4. Utj ~s (trash, w~terlsewer,
, i el~C. lga~) $111,000
- 5.' Asse~smeqts and Mis¢. Taxes $ 10 000
6, RTC Monitodn~ $ 7,500
7. Replaceme'nt Reserves (P, TC
required amount) $ 37,8b0
8. Insurance ¢nduding flood) $ 23,000
9. secu'rity (actuse) S 44,~po
t0, Ope~aUr~g Reserves $ 13.500
Tdtal ,Projected Expenses $553,0.80
Note fr2: Capitol Improvements
1. Necessary CapitDi
Impro~/. (jacobs Report) $17,750
2. Additibnal Improvements
(Jacobs R(~port) $12,650
3. Awnings $19,600
4. Three fenced tot !ors $24,000
5. Twenty-fou~' water heaters $ 4,800
6, Furniture for Transiffonai
Apts ($2,500 2br & $1,500
I br) $ 4000
Total Capitol Improvements $82,800
' To Hy~er and Co; property m~nagement compqny (none of this flows to CVHC)
· .-City Contribution, First Year $330,62~ **
-C t~ CentdbuUon, Subsequent Years $ 84,645
(rental subsidy pTus financing uses)
(subsidy Only)
** RTC Pubtic Services Fee of $112,750 plus RDA of $90 300