The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About042099 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours pdor to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE APRIL 20, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 42146 Sixth Street (APN 922-053-024), 28516 Pujol Street (APN 922-053-007), 28496 Pujol Street (APN 922-053-005), Sixth Street/Pujol Street (APN 922-053-009), 28725 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-010), 28725 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-019), 28731 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-016), 28613 Pujol Street (APN 922-054-011) 28649 Pujol Street (APN 922-053-013), and 42291 Sixth Street (APN 922-052- 011 ). The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Ng, Irwin, Barker, Otto, Corbin, Ladanyi, Rutner, Henning, Ciais, Rancho Meadows. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson and John Meyer. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the sale of real property located at 42220 Sixth Street. The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of T,emecu~a and Habitat for Humanity. Inc. Under ne~oti~'.!:n are t~.e terms of payment of the real proper~y interests proposed to De ~:onveyecl and/or acquired. The Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Meyer. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the sale or lease of real property located at 28699 Front Street (APN 922-046-020). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Letter and Associates. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the re~l City/Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O' Grady, and John Meyer. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to these matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances. R:~Agenda\042099 Conference with real property negoUator.pUrsuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisiUon of real property located at 28835 Single Oak Drive, Temecula. The negoUaUng parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Chemicon, Inc. Under negoUation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Mever. Conference with real property negoUator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition and/or leasing of real property located on APN 910-130-072. The negotiating parties are City of Temecula and Forest City, Inc. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired and/or leased. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and James O'Grady. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 99-11 Resolution: No. 99-30 CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Sandi Sharp Invocation: Pastor Rench of Calvary Baptist Church of Temecula Flag Salute: Councilman Comerchero ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Roberrs, Ford PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Council Presentation Veteran Appreciation Month Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS items tnat appear witnin tne Consent Galenoar or ones mat are not listeo on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record, For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. R:~Agenda~042099 2 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed. then (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be Enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Resolution Approvincl List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Award of Construction Contract for Maintenance Facilitv- Second Floor Remodel Proiect - Phase II RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive an oral report on the bids received April 16, 1999; 3.2 Award a construction contract for the Second Floor Remodel - Phase I! - and Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% the contract amount. 3.3 R:~Agenda\042099 4 5 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the FY 1998-99 Street Sealing Project - Project No. PW99-04 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-04 - FY 98-99 Street Sealing Project. Approval of Cooperative Aclreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for the Purchase of a Parkinq Lot in Old Town RECOMMENDATION: 5,1 Approve an agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula to fund the purchase of a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in Old Town Temecula; 5.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report; 5.3 Appropriate $900,000 to the Capital Improvement Projects Fund. Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course - Appeal of the Temecula Parks/Street LiClhtinq Tax RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve staffs recommendation in defining taxable golf course area within the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course property and approve the appropriate refund of the Parks/Street Lighting Tax for Fiscal year 1997-98 and 1998-99. 7 Purchase AClreement for the Temecula Stampede Parkincl Lot 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW ~!,.:_" :.jCT,,2.',:~ Ai,,:, T~.:: FA,-:r, iNG :'..:;,~F_M~t',TS ;;',C,,.,.,bE~ THEREIN FOR THE PARKING LOT NORTHWESTERLY OF FIRST AND FRONT STREETS IN OLD TOWN R:~Agenda\042099 4 7.2 Approve an expenditure in the amount of $610,000 for the purchase of a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in accordance with the agreement entitled Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions, RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R :~genda\042099 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01 Resolution: No. CSD 99-06 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of DireCtors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the CityClerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 23, 1999; ! 2 ~.DDrOve the minutes e~ ,-~rir 13 ! ~,.09. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS R:~Agenda\042099 6 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 11, 1999, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:%Agenda\042099 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01 Resolution: No. RDA 99-06 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberrs, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve minutes of March 23, 1999; 1.2 ,ACsrcve minL:tes cf ~,.sd! '3 I?S9. 2 Approval of Cooperative Aclreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Aqency for the Purchase of a Parkincl Lot in Old Town RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve an agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula to fund the purchase and construction of a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in Old Town Temecula; R:~Agenda\042099 2.2 Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report; 2.3 Transfer $900,000 from the Redevelopment Agency to the City's Capital Improvement Project Fund. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Ford JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUErLIC HEARING 3 Any person may submit written comments to the City CouncillRedevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in courts, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. Habitat for Humanity - Disposition and Development A.areement RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DATED AS OF APRIL 20, 1999 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1--!988 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED ~!SD.n-StTION AN~ ?EVELZ~MENT AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENC'f OF THE CITY OF 'iF_.MECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DATED AS OF APRIL 20, 1999 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1--1988 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Ford DEPARTMENTAL REPORT R:%AgendaM:)42099 9 AGENCY BUSINESS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 11, 1999, scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~genda\042099 10 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BUSINESS Presentation of the Final Report for the Hotel Conference Center Feasibility Analysis prepared by Kevser Marston Associates and Scott Hospitality Consultants RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Provide direction to staff concerning the Council's interest in the City's possible participation in a convention/conference facility; 8.2 If the Council were interested in proceeding with this project, direct staff to work with the Economic Development Subcommittee (or an ad hoc Council subcommittee) to consider the options and issues and to develop a process for the Council to consider the facts and make a final decision. 10 Recommendations for Implementing Economic Development Strate.clv Report by Dr. John Husin.q RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize implementation of the Economic Development Strategy Report as outlined in the staff report. Options for Enhancinci the CitV's Emerclencv Medical Services RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Receive and file report that describes options for enhancing the City's emergency medical services. 1! Co"s;de-at!o~ c~ Wavs and Mea~.s t'-,'-m'~f== t,, Examin= !~, ,=~ ~-,^:-+=,~ ,,, '- (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilman Lindeman$) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Consider formation of a Ways and Means Committee to examine issues associated with possible construction of a sports complex. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 11, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:V~genda\042099 11 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM I ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $770,586.74. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 20th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Re,sos 99- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do cedify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula on the 20th day of Apdl, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Resos 99- CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04108/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/20199 TOTAL CHECK RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/20/99 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY JADA YONKER, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 106,140.81 11,595.27 55,155.49 2,317.40 73.09 24,637.53 407.85 533.273.98 8,170.31 14,968.37 5,977.45 502.48 7,366.71 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 389.132.07 381,454.67 770.586.74 770,586.74 770,586.74 SHAWN NELSON, ACTING CITY MANAGER , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04108/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/20/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/20/~J COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: C: '.E;KS: 0~ I GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COIV~UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: !t ~,140.81 11,595.27 55,155.49 2,317.40 73.09 24,637.53 407.85 533,273.98 8,170.31 14,988.37 5,977.45 502.45 7,366.71 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 389.132.07 381.454.57 770,586.74 770,586.74 770,586.74 11:20 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/HOD SET ASIDE 190 COMHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - 300 iNSURANCE FUND 320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACiLiTiES TOTAL AMOUNT 80,270.01 11,595.27 25,099.49 1,167.40 73.09 2,449.53 407.85 231,625.11 8,170.31 14,968.37 5,977.45 502.48 6,825.71 389,132.07 VCXJCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 04/08/99 11:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 55007 04/05/99 002756 COMPLETE EMBROIDERY DES EMBROIDERY "TEN POLICE" HATS 001-170-999'5243 116.37 116.37 75819 04/07/99 000283 ]NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 190-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX C]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 ]NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 165-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 191-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NED!CARE 194-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 300-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 320-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 75819 04/07/99 000283 INSTATAX (%RS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 iNSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 ]NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD] 165-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD! 190-2070 ~2:04/07/99 000~4 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 ]NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 "'::~ 04/07/9g 0004~ INSTATAX (EDD) 000~44 STA'E 194-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 ZNSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 75962 04/07/99 000444 iNSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 55010 04/08/99 002539 3CMA/CITY COMMUNICATION SAVVY AWARDS CF:G.WOLNICK:5/15 001-111-999-5250 55011 04/08/99 A BAG PUBLICATION VIDEO/BK:ONE WY OUT OF THE JAM 001-161-999-5228 19,404.80 718.08 3,486.79 8.70 22.03 295.24 128.28 260.59 27.42 763.04 140.08 512.75 4,856.64 173.30 997.98 2.43 6.18 76.39 34.70 73.28 24.44 163.44 45.86 141.06 62.23 2.97 45.35 .71 5.73 2.74 6.25 5,107.56 300.11 732.69 1.48 3,53 55.66 22 ..~6 107.74 10.12 182.58 27.79 104.59 65.00 8.57 32,363.50 6,782.19 65.00 CITY OF TEMECULA 11:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 55012 04/08/99 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL POOL MAINT SUPPLIES & EQUIP. 190-180-999-5212 148.63 148.63 55013 04/08/99 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC. BILLBOARD AD:OLD TWN PROMOTION 280-199-999-5362 55014 04/08/99 003639 ADVANCE COPY SERVICES REPAIR FAX MACHINE - POLICE 001-170-999-5229 1,700.00 85.0O 1,700.00 85.00 55015 04/08/99 001538 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA REPAIR TO INTERCONNECT SYSTEM 210-165-601-5804 55016 04/08/99 ALFARO, JUAN REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 1,080.00 100.00 1,080.00 100.00 55017 04/08/99 001375 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION MEMBERSHIP: J. HODSON 001-163-999-5226 125.00 125.00 55018 04/08/99 000102 AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C TEMP FENCE 8 THE MUSEUM 210-190-808-5804 55019 04/08/99 003607 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SA MISC SAFETY EQUIP-PW CREW 001-164-601-5218 55019 04/08/99 003607 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SA MISC SAFETY EQUIP-PW CREW 001-164-601-5218 55020 04/08/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - TCC 190-184-999-5212 55020 04/08/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - TCC 190-184-999-5212 55020 04/08/99 000622 BANTA ELECTR]C-REFRIGER REISSUE CK:ELECT SVCS -q C.HALL 340-199-701-5212 04/08/99 BARRAZA, ADAM 55U22 04/08/99 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAIN BEST BUY COHPANY, INC, 55023 04/08/99 003650 55024 04/08/99 002377 55025 04/08/99 002871 BOYKIN, EDWARD W. 55025 04/08/99 002871 BOYKIN, EDUARD W. 55C2~ 04/08/99 002871 BOYKIN, EDWARD W. 55026 04/08/99 002829 BRIDGHAM, DENNIS 55027 04/08/99 000901 C P R S 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 5~325 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55028 04/08/99 000128 55/022~ 04/08/99 000128 04/08/99 000128 04/08/99 000128 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REPAIRS TO CULVERTS IN OLD TWN "DETECT DECEPTION" SEMINAR:5/6 COMPUTER LOAN PRGM: J.HILLS MISC ELECTRONIC EQUIP A/V MISC ELECTRONIC EQUIP A/V CAMERA ISOLATION SWITCHER REIMB:VIDEO TAPE FOR BROADCAST AWARDS BANQUET:HP,JP,CA:4/16 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 UORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL*SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, 190-2900 280-199-824-5804 001-170-999-5261 001-1175 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 320~199-999-5242 320-199-999-5210 190-180-999-5258 001-2370 165-2370 190-2370 191-2370 192-2370 193-2370 194-2370 280-2370 300-2370 320-2370 330-2370 340-2370 001-164-604-5112 001-140-999-5112 244.00 408.71 483.89 85.60 166.90 450.00 100.00 4,820.00 495.00 1,387.99 330.64 73.03 893.00 90.40 105.00 2,939.09 65.30 877.73 .66 1.66 39.82 16.57 24.26 6.18 42.53 11.22 219.65 .12 .03 244.00 892.60 702.50 100.00 4,820,00 495.00 1,387.99 1,296.67 90.40 105.00 VOUCHRE2 P/~ 04/08/99 11: 20 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 55028 55028 55029 55030 55031 55031 55031 55032 55033 55033 55034 55035 55035 55036 55037 55038 55039 55040 ~5041 55041 55042 55043 55043 55043 55043 55043 55043 55043 55043 55043 55044 55044 55044 CHECK DATE 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 VENDOR NUMBER 000128 000128 001054 002534 001195 001195 001195 000912 003252 003252 001233 003573 003573 003649 000166 000170 000184 001937 000177 000177 000378 000186 000186 000186 000~86 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 002126 002126 002126 VENDOR NAME CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF CATERERS CAFE, THE CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CAL CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC, DANKEL, AMY K. DANKEL, AMY K. DORLAND MT ARTS COLONY, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GALLS, INC. GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT HAFELI, THOMAS HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWADE. INC. HA~KS HARDWARE, iNC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HILLYARD FLOUR CARE SUP HILLYARD FLOUR CARE SUP HILLYARD FLOUR CARE SUP CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION WORKERS' COMP FOR MARCH 99 WORKERS# COMP FOR MARCH 9g YEARLY MEMBERSHIP: A. ELMO REFRESHMENTS: PLANNING TEC MTG ALARM MONITORZNG - CRC CRC-QUARTERLY FIRE SYS.INSPEC. ALARM MONITORING-SENIOR CENTER MEMBERSHIP:S.JONES/M.BALLREICH JANITORIAL PRODUCTS -CITY HALL JANITORIAL PRODUCTS-SR CENTER PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 98/99 COMM SVCS FUNDING PRGM LOT BOOK RPT: VIA PUERTA FRANKLIN PLANNERS:PLANNING DPT 909 695-1178 MARGAR[TA COM PRK BADGE HOLDER & TELEPHONE CASE MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES -FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE REIMB:BRAINSHARE CF:3/21-27/99 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-PW CRE~S SPACE HEATERS FOR INSPECTORS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - D~RKS MAZNTENANCE SUPPL:ES- CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES- TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ' PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-SR.CENTER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ' TCC FINISH FOR CRC GYM FLOUR FINISH FOR CRC GYM FLOUR GRiT SCREENS FOR CRC GYM FLOUR ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5112 190-181-999-5112 001-162-999-5226 001-161-999-5260 190-182-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 001-120-999-5226 340-199-701-5212 190-181-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 001-101-999-5267 165-199-813-5804 001-161-999-5220 320-199-999-5208 001-162-999-5242 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 320-199-999-5258 001-164-601-5218 001-16~-604-5242 340-199-701-5212 ~90-!80-0o0-52!2 190-i82-99;-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 5.48 5.26 150.00 10.20 50.00 150.00 45.00 146.75 408.75 202.52 14.93 264. O0 672. O0 2,000.00 150.00 20.26 66.10 36.14 58.83 251.83 1,243.03 213.66 193.79 260.32 1.07 376.83 460.44 32.91 395.05 365.00 49.55 205.13 1,494.06 199.20 103.92 CHECK AMOUNT 4,255.56 150.00 10.20 245.00 146.75 611.27 14.93 936. O0 2,0 ~'~ 150.00 20.26 66.10 36.14 310.66 1,243.03 2,553.75 · 11:20 IOUCNER/ :HECK CHECK VENDOR ~UMBER DATE NUMBER 55044 04/08/99 002126 55044 04/08/99 002126 55044 04/08/99 002126 55044 04/08/99 002126 55044 04/08/99 002126 55045 04/08/99 003648 55046 04/08/99 002098 55047 04/08/99 55048 04/08/99 001407 55049 04/08/99 000203 55050 04/08/99 002909 55051 04/08/99 001534 55~ 4/08/99 001534 55052 04/08/99 001534 55052 04/08/99 001534 55052 04/08/99 001534 55052 04/08/99 001534 55053 04/08/99 001967 55053 04/08/99 001967 ~5953 0~/08/9Q 001967 ~5053 0~/08/99 001967 55053 04/08/99 001967 55054 04/08/99 000843 55055 04/08/99 003651 55056 04/08/99 003241 :~ %/C~/~o 00~384 55057 0~/08/99 001384 55058 04/08/99 000973 55059 04/08/99 55059 04/08/99 5506/~4/08/99 003428 / 550 /08/99 003613 VENDOR NAME HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP HOLMES, TOOD HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES INSURANCE COMPANY OF TH INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL JOBS AVAILABLE, INC, K U C ENGINEERING, INC. KINCO PALM PLAZA, LP LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MANPC)~ER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MCDANIEL ENG. MCGAVRAN, LORRI ANN MILLAR HEATING & AIR, MINUTEMAN DR~SS MINUTEMAN PRESS MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI MIRANDA, JEANNE MIRANDA, JEANNE MVP TEMECULA SHUTTLE NATION~IDE REHAB & REST CZTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION BLUE PADS FOR CRC GYM FLOOR ROLLER TO COMPLETE GYM FLOOR ROLLER COVER FOR GYM FLOOR FREIGHT SALES TAX REINB:CPRS CF:02/18-21/99 MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEN. POLICE RE I MB: ON POUCY S.I.R. CRC POOL SANXTIZZNG CHEMICALS RECRUITMENT AD:MUSEUM SVCS MGR MAR DESIGN SVCS:RANCHO CA SPTS RGHT-OF-~Y ACQUISITION:OVERLND AIR:CPRS CF:PARKER:2/18-21/99 AIR:CPRS CF:RUSE:2/18-21/99 AIR:CPRS CF:PELLETIER:2/18-21 AZR:CPRS CF:HOLMES:2/18-21/99 AIR:CPRS CF:N[MESHEIN:2/18-21 AIR:CPRS CF:MCGAVRAN:2/18-21 AIR:BRAINSHARE 99:HAFELI:3/21 TEMP HELP (3)~/E 3/14 BELIAN TEMP HELP (3)W/E 3/14 BELIAN TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 HiLL TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 LUQUE TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 LUQUE FEB:PROF SERV:R.C./I15 REINBURSE:CPRS CF:2/18-21/99 HVAC REPAIR BUSINESS CARDS:S.GRIFFIN SALES TAX WALL ENCLOS ASSY DB:PLAYGRD REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT ADD~L R(30N RENTAL SNTL:BRAINSHARE CF:TH:03/20/99 RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:PATTERSON ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-521Z 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5258 001-170-999-5214 300-199-409~ 190-182-999-5212 001-150-999-5254 210-190-154-5802 210-165-604-5700 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 320-199-999-5258 001-171-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 190-182-999-5118 190-182-999-5118 210-165-601-5801 190-180-999-5258 190-184-999-5250 001-!61-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 190-180-999-5212 190-2900 190-183-4990 320-199-999-5258 165-199-813-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 19.88 28.57 7.87 34.00 143.65 6.87 462.93 14,769.2~ 296.31 82.80 85.00 198,781.89 118.00 118.00 118.00 118.00 118.00 194.00 160.00 780.19 520.13 364.48 369.84 52.96 50.00 84.85 67.50 38.25 2.96 140.44 100.00 45.00- 77.05 4,990.00 CHECK AMOUNT 2,031.15 6.87 462.93 14,769.23 296.31 82.80 85.00 198,781.89 944.00 2,087.60 50.00 84.85 67.50 41.21 140.44 55.00 77.05 4,990.00 VOUCHRE2 04/08/99 11:20 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 55062 55062 55063 55064 55065 55065 55065 55065 55065 55065 55065 55065 55065 55065 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 002292 002292 002105 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 OASIS VENDING OASIS VENDING ODEN, ANNE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET PAGENET MAR COFFEE SRVC& SUPPLIES MAR COFFEE SRVC& SUPPLIES REFUND: SWIM LESSONS CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR*JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL APR-JUN PAGING SVC & RENTAL PAGER SVC DEACTIVATED:S.N. 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-183-4975 190-180-999-5214 320-199-999-5238 001-162-999-5238 001-164-601-5238 001-170-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 001-120-999-5238 001-150-999-5250 001-110-999-5238 001-100-999-5238 001-164-601-5238 260.81 86.94 15.00 39.53 6.08 37.86 76.05 154.28 420.91 41.02 41.03 41.03 22.90 34.88- 347,75 15.00 39.53 806.28 55066 55067 55068 55069 55069 55070 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 003653 000359 003224 003218 003218 002331 PAR[SI, LISA A PARKER, HERMAN PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CO PELA PELA PEP BOYS |NC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REIMBURSE:CPRS CF:2/17-21/99 MONITORING PALA RD BRIDGE MEDIAN:PLANCHECK SVS LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK SVS AUTO PARTS & MISC SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5258 210-165-631-5801 191-180-999-5248 193-180-999-5248 001-164-601-5218 120.00 58.57 25,000.00 1,125.00 900.00 47.26 120.00 5P/'~ / 25,00b. 2,025.00 47.26 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 04/08/QQ 0~/C3i99 04/08/99 04~08~99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 0~/08/99 0-i~/~ 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 00024~ 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 DERS (EMPL3YEES' RETIRE 0002~o PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PE~S (EMDLgvEES' RE"~E 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RE' PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS-PRE PERS-PRE PERS"PRE PERS-PRE PERS-PRE SURVIVOR 001-2130 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2130 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2130 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 191-2130 192-2130 193-2130 194-2130 001-2390 322.43 11.15 23,836.76 693.64 3.01 3,859.92 13.31 33.93 407.92 196.67 .~0 30~.77 130.52 690.59 142.40 491.04 263.61 2.81 5.62 39.33 8.43 74.87 11:20 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]OOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55071 55073 55074 55074 55074 55074 55075 55075 55075 55075 55076 55076 55076 55077 55078 55079 55080 55~! 55082 55082 55083 55084 55084 CHECK DATE 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 VENDOR NUMBER 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000253 000253 000253 000253 000254 000254 000254 000254 000254 000254 000254 000981 000981 000981 000260 000947 002907 000266 000352 000418 000418 000268 002181 002181 000271 000271 VENDOR NAME PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES, RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PINTO, DEBORAH POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER ITEM DESCRIPTION 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR REFUND: TEEN MAKE OVER CLASS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC RHF INC. R H F INC. RHF INC. RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C REINHART-FONTES ASSOC., RIGHTWAY RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & NOTICE:HABITAT HU NOTICE:PA99-O067 NOTICE:2.40.100 NOT[CE:STORMWATER NOTICE:ZONING NAP NOTZCE:CAMPOSVERD NOTICE:PA99-O038 RADAR EQUIPMENT REPAIR:TEM.PD RADAR EQUIPMENT REPAIR:TEM.PD RADAR EQUIPMENT REPAZR:TEM.PD MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES APPRAISAL-30 ACRES VACANT LAND APR PORTABLE TOILET-RIVERTON ASSESSOR MAP COPIES RECORDING FEE:REL.L[EN:B.SMITH RECORDING FEE:REL.LIEN:JUSTUS MAR 99 PAYMENT FOR K-RAT JAN:PRGSS PMT #32:WINCH/I-15 RET. W/H PMT#32:WINCHESTER/115 FEB:PROFSERV:WINCH MED/TRAFSIG FEB ENG SVCS:S,GERTRUDIS TRAIL ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-Z~90 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 3ZO-Z390 330-2390 340-2390 190-183-4980 190-180-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-140-999-5220 210-165-631-5804 165-199-999-5Z50 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5220 001-120-999-5250 001-1215 001-2300 280-199-602-5804 280-2035 210-165-686-5802 210-190-147-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 1.87 13.87 .05 .14 1.52 .84 .92 .46 1.86 .93 2.18 65.00 15.75 39.75 31.80 11.75 21.25 18.50 5.75 6.50 7.75 8.25 19.75 142.75 156.53 59.00 54.68 10.69 4,500.00 62.89 30.00 10,00 10.00 2,150.00 920.70 46.04- 400.00 2,400.00 CHECK AMOUNT 31,555.25 65.00 99.05 87.75 358.28 54.68 10.69 4,500.00 62.89 3C.00 20.00 2,150.00 874.66 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 04/08/99 11:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 55085 04/08/99 000271 ROBERT BEIN, I.N FROST & ENG.SVCS:INTERSECTION EXHIBITS 001-165-999-SZ50 2,000.00 4,800.00 55086 04/08/99 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS REIMBURSE:CPRS CF:2/17-2/21/99 190-180-999-5258 53.98 53.98 55087 04/08/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR EGG HUNT 4/3/99 190-183-999-5370 1,001.97 55087 04/08/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR EGG HUNT 4/3/99 190-183-999-5370 333.03 1,335.00 55088 04/08/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5042:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 3,881.37 55088 04/08/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAR:2-OO-397-SO67:VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 633.65 55088 04/08/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON ' MAR:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 12.96 55088 04/08/99 000537 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON MAR:67-77-863-1535-91:MCCABE 190-180-999-5240 2,898.20 7,426.18 55089 04/08/99 000574 SUPERTONER REMANUFACTURED LASERJET TONER 320-199-999-5221 1,089.35 1,089.35 55090 04/08/99 003599 T Y INTERNATIONAL FEB:PROF SERV:OVERLAND DR OC 210-165-604-5804 1,775.53 1,775.53 55091 04/08/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. CAMERA & OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 30.14 55091 04/08/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. CAMERA & OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5220 90.42 55091 04/08/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-2910 183.15 303.71 55092 04/08/99 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 401.59 55092 04/08/99 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLOWERS PER HR DISCRETION 001-150-999-5250 46.28 55093 04/08/99 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY EMPLOYEE O.F THE QTR:M.WOLFF 001-150-999-5265 61.63 55093 04/08/99 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY BRONZE PLAQUE - 10x12 WITH 190-180-999-5244 282.50 55093 04/08/99 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY SALES TAX 190-180-999-5244 21.89 366.02 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-163-999-5263 147.35 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-601-5263 463.80 55094 04/08/09 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-604-5263 58.23 ~:.::'j G~/~8/99 0C, 39~9 TE~ECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-165-999-5263 50.45 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-161-999-5263 11.26 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-999-5263 111.34 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED JAN VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 190-180-999-5263 428.48 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-163-999-5263 217.28 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-601-5263 449.29 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-604-5263 99.42 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-165-999-5263 57.60 55094 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-161-999-5263 11.18 =::~__ ~/~,';o 0000~9 TE~ULA VA._L~v UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-000-52~3 ': --- j- %~/;; OGG~'9 TE~E:LL; ','_LEv UN~:T~D FEB VEHZZLE r~EL USAGE !90-18J-999-52~3 ~.~0 5509~ 04/08/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FEB VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-170-999-5262 15.00 55095 04/08/99 TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMEN REISSUE: CK#44569 FOR REFUND 001-2290 .22 55095 04/08/99 TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMEN REISSUE: CK#44569 FOR REFUND 001-162-4285 14.00 55095 04/08/99 TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMEN REISSUE: CK~44569 FOR REFUND 001-162-4201 6.57 55096 04/08/99 000668 TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS RENTAL EQUIPMENT-EGG HUNT 4/03 190-183-999-5370 100.00 55096 04/08/99 000668 TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS RENTAL EQUIP.FOR EGG HUNT 4/03 190-183-999-5~70 100.00 55097 04/08/99 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. RECREATION EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5380 384.11 2,726.87 20.79 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 55098 55098 55099 55099 55100 55101 55102 55103 55104 55104 55105 11:20 CHECK DATE 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 04/08/99 VENDOR NUMBER 000332 000332 003609 003609 001650 002109 002092 000345 000345 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR [TEN NAME DESCRIPTION VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE VENTURA CONSULTING GROU FEB PLAN CHECK SERVICES FEB PLAN CHECK SERVICES WRKSHOP:OVERLAND OVERCROSSING VENTURA CONSULTING GROU WRKSHOP:OVERLAND OVERCROSSING WEARGUARD CORP. WESTERN MUSEUMS ASSOCIA WHITE CAP WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ZD JOURNALS CHORE COAT FOR TCSD MAINT.CREW WEB SITE RECRUITING:MUSEUM MGR MISC, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PRODUCTION/CEO OPTO 22 AD XEROX COPIER SUPPLIES MAR COPIER LEASE:5021 ANNUAL RENEWAL:INSIDE NETWARE TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 210-165-604-5801 001-1270 190-180-999-5243 001-150-999-5254 001-164-601-5218 001-111-999-5270 330-199-999-5220 190-184-999-5239 320-199-999-5228 ITEM AMOUNT 1,792.49 2,865.45 1,798.00 1,798.00 70.20 30.00 345.09 366.35 131.46 67.08 99.00 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 4,657.94 3,596.00 70.20 30.00 345.09 366.35 198.54 99.00 389,132.07 VOUCHRE2 p~"~ 04/08/99 11: 42 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FUND TZTLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 25,870.80 30,056.00 1,150.00 22,188.00 301,648.87 541.00 381,454.67 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55108 55109 55109 55110 55111 55112 55113 55114 55115 11:42 CHECK DATE 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 04/20/99 VENDOR NUMBER 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 003592 003592 002406 002993 002993 003218 003218 000247 000406 003652 VENDOR NAME EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE GRANITE CONSTRUCTION GRANITE CONSTRUCT]ON PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, PELA PELA PESTMASTER RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S SCHAFFER ACOUSTICS INC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MAR LDSCP SVCS: STREETSCAPE MAR LDSCP SVCS: PARKS MAR LDSCP SVCS: WINCH CRK PRK MAR LDSCP SVCS: SLOPES MAR LDSCP SVCS: SOUTH SLOPES MAR LDSCP SVCS: MEDIANS MAR LDSCP SVCS: PARKS MAR LDSCP SVCS:SENIOR CTR MAR LDSCP SVCS:CRC MAR LDSCP SVCS:TCC MAR LDSCP SVCS:CITY HALL MAR LDSCP SVCS:O.T,PARKING LOT MAR LDSCP SVCS:FIRE STN #84 MAR PRGSS:PALA RD BRIDGE RETENTION:MAR PRGSS:PALA BRDGE FURNITURE:C,H, MODIFICATIONS JAN-MAR DESIGN SVC:I15/WINCH JAN-MAR DESIGN SVC:I15/WINCH MAR PLAN CHECK SERVICES CREDIT: BILLING ERROR PEST CONTROL SVCS:CITY LOTS FEB 99 BOOKING FEES FEB-MAR PROF.SVCS:OVERLAND DR. ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-199-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 001-164-603-5415 001-171-999-5212 210-165-631-5804 210-2035 210-199-808-5804 210-165-697-5802 210-165-697-5802 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 001-164-601-5402 001-170-999-5273 210-165-604-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 106,00 7,806.00 1,568.00 8,813.00 13,375.00 1,150.00 18,578.00 361.00 1,444.00 193.00 541,00 250,00 400.00 284,030.00 28,403.00- 32,442.24 4,326.79 2,422.82 12,395.00 200.00- 5,077.00 7,948.80 6,830.02 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 54,585.00 255,627.00 32,442.24 6,749.61 12,195.00 5,077.00 7,948.80 6,830.02 TOTAL CHECKS 381,454,67 ITEM ITEM 4 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Acting City Manager/City Council Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official .~ April 20, 1999 Reschedule of Award Construction Contract for Maintenance Facility, Second Floor Remodel to Regular Meeting of May 25, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: On April 7, 1999 a Notice of Invitation to Bid was advertised for the remodel of the second floor of the maintenance facility. This was being done in order to maximize available room for staff. On April 16, 1999, bids were opened from two (2) responding construction firms. The bids received were in excess of the amount of $75,000 which disqualifies an informal bid procedure; therofore, it is staff's recommendation that this time be rescheduled to the May 25, 1999, regular meeting. The project will be re advertised in accordance with the city's adopted formal bidding procedures. R: \BROCKMEI\AGENDA\RESCHEDULE OF AWARD-MAIN FACILITY 2ND FLR REMODEL.DOC | 4/20/99 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council '1'Jl~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 20, 1999 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the FY98-99 Street Sealing Project - Project No. PW99-04 PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Sped~cations and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-04, FY98-99 Street Sealing Project. BACKGROUND: With the Pavement Management System (PMS) in place, a five (5) year Street Sealing Program has been formulated. This year's Street Sealing Program will be using rubberized sealing agent called, "Rubberized Polymer Modified Emulsion (RPME)", which is a preventive maintenance measure where an asphalt concrete surface has become dry or brittle. This rubberized agent will be placed over the existing A.C. pavement to replace the fine materials and oils, also seal the pavement surface against water intrusion. This treatment will prolong the life of the existing asphalt from five (5) to seven (7) years. All streets within the City were physically inspected, evaluated and pdoritized during the implementation of the Pavement Management System. Based on these prionties, streets were grouped into areas t~ -+ would provide for the most cost-effective projects while providing maintenance where it would be most beneficial. The work to be performed will also include crack sealing, treating of all oil stains and replacement of all striping and street legends. Upon authorization and approval, Project No. PW99-04, will be advertised for at least twenty-one (21) days. with the bid opening on May 20, 1999. This project has an estimated construction time of sixty (60) working c~ays to complete. The Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction. These Plans and Specifications are available for review in the City Engineers office. All plans used in the construction of this project are City of Temecula Standard Plans approved by the City Council in October 1998. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $300,000.00. r:~agdrpt~99\0420~N99-04 .bid/seh FISCAL IMPACT: 001 - 164-601-5402. ATTACHMENT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Street Maintenance Account Attachment "A" r:~agdrpt~99~0420\pw99-04 .bid/seh ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROJECT NO. PW99-04 STREET SEALING PROJECT FY98-99 LOCATION '! YNEZ BETWEEN SANTIAGO & VALLEJO YNEZ BETWEEN VALLEJO AND FLORES YNEZ BETWEEN FLORES AND CORONADO YNEZ BETWEEN CORONADO AND YORBA YNEZ BETWEEN YORBA AND EAST VALLEJO YNEZ BETWEEN EAST VALLEJO AND JEDEDIAH SMITH DE PORTOLA BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH AND VERDE DRIVE DE PORTOLA BETWEEN VERDE DRIVE AND PIO PICO DE PORTOLA BETWEEN PIO PICO AND MARGARITA SANTIAGO EASTBOUND FROM YNEZ TO END OF PAVING VALLEJO BETWEEN SANTIAGO AND YNEZ VALLEJO AVENUE BETWEEN YNEZ AND CABO STREET VALLEJO BETWEEN CABO AND PALMA VALLEJO BETWEEN PALMA AND LA PAZ VALLEJO BETWEEN LA PAZ AND YNEZ EAST VALLEJO BETWEEN YNEZ AND CABRILLO EAST VALLEJO BETWEEN CABRILLO AND END OF STREET CABRILLO BETWEEN VALLEJO AND JOHN WARNER CABRILLO BETWEEN JOHN WARNER AND YORBA CABRILLO BETWWEEN YORBA AND EAST VALLEJO CABRILLO BETWEEN EAST VALLEjO AND JEDEDIAH SMITH YORBA EAST OF CABRILLO TO CUL DE SAC YORBA~ETWEEN CABRILLO AND YNEZ YORBA WEST OF YNEZ JOHN WARNER WEST OF CABRILLO JOHN WARNER EAST OF CABRILLO TO END OF ROAD j__RAMIE DRfVE SOUTH OF JOHN WARNER CAJON DRIVE EAST OF CABRILLO FLORES CIRCLE WEST OF YNEZ FLORES CIRCLE EAST OF YNEZ CORONADO WEST OF YNEZ CORONADO EAST OF YNEZ LA PAZ BETWEEN YNEZ AND VALLEJO AVENUE LA PAZ BETWEEN VALLEJO AND 79S PALMA CIRCLE NORTH EAST OF VALLEJO AVENUE SQUARE:: FOOTAGE 31,540 31,380 47,650 47, 160 79,810 33,440 152,690 72,060 65,560 42,390 42,280 22,230 49,280 26,800 84,200 24,780 7,830 31,490 24,130 38.010 16,940 14,940 27,610 9,460 13,460 15,530 7.740 10,800 16,540 11,110 10,520 11,000 35,380 16,230 10,480 r:~gdrpt\99\0420\pw99-04.bid/seh LOCATION CABO STREET NORTH OF VALLEJO AVENUE JEDEDIAH JEDEDIAH JEDEDIAH CALLE DE CALLE DE PESCADO PESCADO MANZANO MANZANO SMITH BETVVEEN 79S AND YNF_..Z SMITH BE'rVVEEN YNEZ AND CABRILLO SITH BETWEEN CABRILLO AND CALLE DE VELARDO VELARDO BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH AND PESCADO DRIVE VELARDO BETWEEN PESCADO AND CUL DE SAC BETWEEN CALLE DE VELARDO AND MANZANO BETWEEN MANZANO AND JEDEDIAH SMITH BETWEEN PESCADO AND MIRAPOSA PLACE BETWEEN MIRAPOSA AND SANTIAGO MIRAPOSA BETWEEN MANZANO AND CUL DE SAC SANTIAGO BETWEEN AVENIDA DE SAN PASQUAL AND MARGARITA SAN FERMIN PLACE BETWEEN MARGARITA AND CUL DE SAC PIASANO BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH AND CUL DE SAC EL LUCERO PLACE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH AND CUL DE SAC EL FARO PLACE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH AND CUL DE SAC VERDE DRIVE BETWEEN DE PORTOLA AND CUL DE SAC VILLA DEL SUR BETWEEN DE PORTOLA AND CUL DE SAC PIO PICO ROAD BETWEEN DE PORTOLA AND RENDOVA PLACE PIO PICO ROAD BETWEEN RENDOVA PLACE AND MARGARITA RENDOVA PLACE BETWEEN PIO PICO AND CUL DE SAC TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: TOTAL SQUARE MILES: :SQUARE': :FOOTAGE 15,160 19,440 19,560 25,290 55,940 27 550 24 700 25 970 34970 17 860 14,480 48,750 35,450 25,000 15,280 13,410 13,270 18,830 43,510 19,320 17,850 1,714,040 39.35 r:~agdrpt\99',0420'~pw99-04 .bid/seh Massage Business Ordinance: A revised draft of the ordinance has been reviewed by the City Attorney and staff will be taken the draft ordinance back to the Massage Ordinance working group next month. General Plan Circulation Element Update: The consultant is currently ~nalizing the mall opening and build-out traffic studies. Subdivision Ordinance: Staff is preparing the Ordinance for the Commission's consideration. Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to scheduling this item for the Planning Commission's consideration. RedhawldVail Ranch Annexation Study:. The preliminary eftotis have all been completed and the Coundl has set a date for the election. Surface Mining Ordinance: Staff is making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council's for their consideration Geographic Information System (GIS): Staff is working on the final GIS versions of colored Zoning and General Plan Land Use maps and has started on the Area "A" Map for the RV Ordinance, and the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly study and habitat area map. The initial use of GIS has exceeded initial projections. Sign Ordinance Handbooks: To make it easier for City staff and the business community to implement the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, staff is preparing handbooks for Office and Industrial Signage Handbooks. Update to the Housing Element: Staff is currently reviewing the Proposals that were submitted and will be setting dates for the consultant interviews next month. Antenna Ordinance: The City Attorney is still reviewing the draft document. Coordination w~th the Bureau of Census. Staff cantinues to work with the Bureau to ens' % an accurate ana complete count for the 2000 census. R:%MONTHLY,R P'I'~I 999~March 99.doc 5 REVPRIN2 i ~?/99 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4139 4140 4170 4171 4190 4195 4200 16:15:23 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER CONDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE K-RAT STUDY FEES HOME OCCUPATIONS DEVLPMNT PLAN-ADMINISTRATIVE D]F REDUCTION APPLICATION IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEYAT~ON tEES ~:~,: :Z~ U.,;' MaP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1999 ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 SSO.O0 1,980.00 5,700.00 61,100.00 6,380.00 24,070.00 9,540.00 570.00 2,280.00 420.00 3,500.00 .00 3,460.00 43,180.00 12,840.00 4,450.00 162,900.00 .00 .00 300.00 42,310.00 .00 .00 2,990.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 10,760.00 .O0 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,520.00 5,850.00 .00 .00 350.00 .00 409,000.00 MARCH REVENUE .00 .00 .00 352.00 .00 .00 650.00 460.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,746.00 5,373.00 .00 .00 15,187.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,295.00 472.00 .00 .00 .00 1,161.75 .00 .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,300.00 2,040.00 187.GO 17,010,00 48,733.75 1998-99 REVENUE .00 325.00 200.00 2,402.00 52,024.48 .00 9,466.60 3,220.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,492.00 30,695.00 .00 12,384.00 83,472.00 .00 .00 .00 27,637.00 7,400.00 5,314.00 .00 .00 108.00 17,115.00 6,790.00 .00 .00 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,200.00 10,240.00 748.0C 59,355.00 342,088.08 PAGE BALANCE .00 225.00 1,780.00 3,298. O0 9,075.52 6,380. O0 14,603.40 6,320.00 570.00 2,280.00 420.00 3,500.00 .00 2,032.00- 12,485.00 12,840.00 7,934. O0 - 79,428. O0 .00 .00 300.00 14,673.00 7,400.00- 5,314.00- 2,990. O0 .00 108.00- 17,115.00- 6,790.00- 1 O, 760. O0 2,500.00- .00 .00 .00 3,520.00 5,850.00 5,200.00- 10,240,00- · Z Z 3~;~,0C- 59,355.00- 66,911.92 % COL 59.1 10.1 42.1 85.1 0.0 39.3 33.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 158.7 71.1 0.0 278.3 51.2 65.3 0.0 e.o 0.0 0.0 213.7 83.6 ;mmm REPT155 04/14/99 16:04 COUNT & VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE Subtotal: Cnstr Type Office: ALL Date Range I 03/01/99 Thru 03/31/99 MARCH 1999 Types (Select):PLAN Date T A/P/D Type A PLAN CASE - 2/4/98 Construction type CEQA-ALL OTHER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CHANGE OF ZONE EXT OF TIME/PLOT PLANS FOR TRACKING PURPOSES HOME OCCUPATION PHASING MAP LD-SEWER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MERGER OF CONT. PARCELS MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PM MINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT DEV PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE DEV PLAN-W/CEQA VOID/PLANNING-B&S Count Sq Feet 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 24 0 1 0 2 0 i 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 6 0 3 0 1 0 56 0 TOTAL ** 56 0 -r × N3'I~ O~ LLI ~LU I ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/Acting City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~ April 20, 1999 Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for the Purchase of a Parking Lot in Old Town RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve an agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula to fund the purchase of a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in Old Town Temecula. 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report. 3. Appropriate $900,000 to the Capital Improvement Projects Fund. BACKGROUND: In a separate City Council Agenda Report, it was recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an agreement to purchase a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in Old Town Temecula, and the expenditure of $610,000 for the purchase of this parking lot. In addition to the purchase price of $610,000, it is estimated that construction improvements to the parking lot will total $290,000, for a total estimated project cost of $900,000. The Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33220, authorizes and encourages cities and redeveloDment a~oencies to assist each other and to cooperate in the planning, unaer~aking, construction, ancl operations of redevelopment projects. The Old Town Specific Plan and the Redevelopment Agency's Implementation Plan call for the development of public parking lots in the Old Town Area. By purchasing and constructing the parking lot northwesterly of Front and First Streets, the City of Temecula will be providing a strategically located parking lot that will satisfy a large portion of the parking needs in the southern end of Old Town. The attached "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for the purchase and funding of the parking lot located northwesterly of Front and First Streets will implement the funding plans of the City and the Agency for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $900,000 have previously been appropriated in the Redevelopment Agency Capital Improvement Project Fund. These funds will be transferred to cover all project costs. Attachments: A. Cooperative Agreement COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PARKING LOT LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF FRONT AND FIRST STREETS IN OLD TOWN TEMECULA. THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT made and effective as of April 20, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each party finds and determines to be tree and correct: a, The Community Redevelopment Law Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. b, The Old Town Specific Plan, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Redevelopment Agency' s Implementation Plan call for the development of public parking lots in the Old Town Area. C, Purchase and construction of the parking lot located northwesterly of Front and First Streets in Old Town Temecula within the Project Area will provide substantial parking that will satisfy a large portion of the parking needs in the southern end of Old Town and is therefore of benefit to the Project Area. d, No other reasonable means of financing the purchase and construction of this parking lot are available to the community. e, The purchase and construction of the public parking lot will assist in the elimination of blight in the Project Area. The City and the Agency agree to cooperate and share responsibility for the purchase of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The City shall undertake the following responsibilities with respect to the parking lot purchase: a, Prepare the necessary engineering and other reports necessary to complete the purchase. b. Acquire the property for the parking lot. c. Complete the construction of the parking lot in the southern end of Old Town. T. he City shall pay for the purchase and construction of the parking lot, including all closing and associated costs. The Agency shall reimburse the City for all payments made to complete the purchase and construction of the parking lot. The Acting City Manager, upon the recommendation of the Director of Finance, shall determine the allocation of costs between the City and Agency pursuant to this Agreement and his or her determination shall be final. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, Agency Secretary Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson. City Attorney/Agency General Counsel ITEM 6 CITY ATTOR~:~ROV~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council j~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services April 20, 1999 Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course - Appeal of the Temecula Parks/Street Lighting Tax PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst. Steven Beswick, Project Engineer (Capital Projects) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve staff's recommendation in defining taxable golf course area within the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course property and approve the appropriate refund of the Parks/Street Lighting Tax for Fiscal Year 1997-98 and 1998-99. BACKGROUND: On March 31, 1998, the City Council considered the appeal filed by Regency Properties concerning the application of the Temecula Parks/Street Lighting Tax upon the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course property. While upholding the rate of 2EDU's per acre for golf course properties, the City Council directed staff to apply the EDU rate only to the portion of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course property that was utilized as part of the commercial entity. As a result, the item was continued off-calendar in order to allow the appellant, Regency Properties, additional time to identify improved golf course area and specific parcel information within the subject property. City staff conducted an inspection of the Golf Course and surveyed the following ten (10) parcels. The table identifies staff's recommendations for defining the respective areas within each parcel as golf course commercial, highway tourist commercial and open space: Assessods Parcel Number Total Acreage each parcel Golf Course Area (taxable - 2 Edu/ac) Highway Tourist (taxable -6 Edulac) Open Space Area (non-taxable) 922-230-004 40.00 0.00 922-230-007 25.00 2.07 922-220-004 52.81 34.65 922-220-007 14.36 12.06 922-220-008 3.99 3.68 922-220-002 86.11 80.00 922-230-002 59.29 43.95 922-220-003 5.75 0.00 922-230-008 16.11 4.94 923-230-003 1.00 0.00 Totals: 304.42 181.35 .........................40.00 .........................22.93 .........................18.16 .........................2.30 ........................0.31 .........................6.11 .........................15.34 5.75 0.00 .........................11.17 .........................1.00 5.75 117.32 The appellant has met with staff and is in agreement with the aforementioned land use information. As a result, of the 304.42 total acres comprising Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course, 181.35 acres shall be taxed at the golf course rate of 2 EDU's per acre; 5.75 acres shall remain at the commercial rate of 6 EDU's per acre; and the remaining 117.32 acres of open space shall be removed from the tax roll, because this portion of the property is not used as part of the commercial venture. It is further recommended that these EDU counts be carried forward into future years, or until new construction or improvements modify the use of the property. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of the appeal by City Council and confirmation of payment of the property taxes by the Tax Collector's Office for Fiscal Years 1997-98 and 1998-99, the property owner shall be entitled to a refund of the following amounts for the City's Park/Street Lighting Tax: Fiscal Year Golf Course Tax Rate/Per acre Ooen Space Acres Refund Amount 1997-98 $142.88 117.32 $16,762.68 1998-99 $136.88 117.32 $16,058.76 932,821.44 The refund amount for fiscal Year 1997-98 shall be paid through account number 190-180- 5375 (prior year refunds). The refund amount for fiscal year 1998-99 shall be paid through account number 190-180-4004 (current year refunds). Approval of the appeal will result in an annual loss of 234.64 EDU's to the Park/Street Lighting budget. Based upon the FY 1998-99 tax rate of $68.44 per EDU, the equivalent loss in revenue amounts to $16,058.76. ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager · ~,"/"' April 20, 1999 Purchase Agreement for the Temecula Stampede Parking Lot RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council adopt the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 99-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" AND THE PARKING EASEMENTS INCLUDED THEREIN FOR THE PARKING LOT NORTHWESTERLY OF FIRST AND FRONT STREETS IN OLD TOWN. That the City Council approve an expenditure in the amount of $610,000 for the purchase of a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front streets in accordance with the agreement entitled "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions." BACKGROUND: Over the past several months, the Redevelopment Agency has been discussing the possibility of purchasing a parking lot located at the intersection of Front and First Streets in Old Town Temecula, on the property owned by the First and Front Partnership. The Old Town Specific Plan and the Redevelopmerit Agency's Im.Dlementation Plan call for the development of public parking lots in the OIc~ Town Area. The public parking lot to be acquired by the Purchase Agreement is strategically located within the Old Town Area and will serve a portion of the public parking needs in Old Town. The Parking Agreement and Purchase Agreement for this property include the following important provisions: 1. Public Parking. The Agreement provides that the City may use the Parking Lot for public parking and the owner of Parcel (1) has a non-exclusive right to use the Parking Lot for its tenants and their customers. Parcel (1)'s dght to use the Parking Lot is limited to parking in connection with uses on Parcel (1) so that the owner of Parcel (1) cannot lease spaces for uses unrelated to Parcel (1), such as vehicle storage. 2. Citv to Maintain Parking Lot. The Agreement provides that the Parking Lot will be used and maintained by the City at all times as a public parking lot, except for permitted construction on Parcel (3). If the City does not use and maintain the Parking Lot as a public parking lot, the Parking Lot will automatically revert to the owner of Parcel (1), but the owners will be required to provide the City with notice and a thirty day opportunity to cure any default before the reversion takes place. Without a requirement for payment of the purchase price or construction costs and with a short cure period, the resolution of a dispute with respect to maintenance or use of the Parking Lot will be more cumbersome and expensive due to the dsk of loosing the Parking Lot property 30 days after notice of a default. The City will need to be vigilant in making sure that the Parking Lot remains a public parking lot and that all of the maintenance requirements are met. (Section 1 .) 3. Free ParkinG. The parking on the Parking Lot shall be free for the owners, tenants and customers of Parcel (1). (Section 2.) 4. Sufficient Spaces for Businesses on Parcel (1).Section 3 provides that the Parking Lot will be developed with as many spaces as practicable under the parking space size and turning aisle requirements of the Development Code. 5. No Bulldines or Structures on the Parking Lot. The Agreement requires that no buildings or structures can be built upon the Parking Lot, except as provided in Section 9 with respect to the development of Parcel (3). (Section 4.) 6, Si.qns. Section 5. provides that the owner of Parcel (1) may place a sign at the entrances to the Parking Lot explaining that the lot is available for the businesses on Parcel (1). The sign may be as large as three feet by four feet. 7. Procedures Related to Free Parkinck The City is required to establish procedures to assure that customers of Parcel (1) can use the parking free of charge. (Section 6.) 8. Maintenance of Parking Lot. The City shall maintain the Parking Lot in accordance with the same maintenance standards and schedules as it uses on the Sixth Street parking lot in Old Town. (Section 7.) 9. Construction on Parking Lot. In constructing the improvements to the Parking Lot, which will include resurfacing and installation of lights, the City agrees to certain procedures to minimize the inconvenience to the tenants of Parcel (1): (1) Proceed as quickly as possible with the construction; (2) submit a construction schedule and parking mitigation plan to the businesses on Parcel 1 at least 15 days prior to the start of construction; (3) limit construction activities to Monday through Thursday (the Stampede is only open Friday, Saturday and Sunday); (4) fill the trenches required for lighting conduit or cover them with plates if the conduit is not completed on a Fdday, Saturday or Sunday; ~.~d (5) if a certain number of parking spaces will be unavailable on a Friday, Saturdav or Sureday. t,ne City will provide alternative spaces. City will also improve the parking spaces on Parcel (i) because the owners of Parcel (1) have given the City an easement for public parking in this area. (Section 8.) 10. Construction on Parcel 3. The City or the Agency may construct commercial buildings on Parcel 3, provided that any portion not improved with a building shall remain as a part of the Parking Lot. (Section 9.) 11. Section 10. Eastern Municipal Water District Lift Station. If the City acquires the property on which the current sewer lift station is operating, the City will improve it for Public Parking and it will become part of the Parking Lot. If the City does not acquire the property and the owner of Parcel (1) acquires it, the City will provide access rights over the Parking Lot to Parcel (1). (Section 10.) 12. AliGnment of First Street BridGe. Upon the realignment of First Street to accommodate the new First Street Bridge, the public property which becomes available as a result of this realignment will be made part of the public parking lot. (Section 11 .) 13. Substitute Parkinc~ Re Parcel (2). In the event the City or the Agency decides to develop Parcel (2), this Section 12 of the Parking Agreement sets forth the requirements for substitute parking for each space removed from public parking. The substitute parking must: (1) Be completed at least 30 days prior to the elimination of the parking spaces; (2) be contiguous to the Parking Lot; (3) be located within 300 feet of the Parking Lot; (4) may not be located on the west side of Murietta Creek; (5) be visible from Front Street; and (6) be accessible from Front Street. 14. Special Events Permit. The owner of Parcel (1) may use up to 25% of the Parking Lot for a special event and not more than two special events will be permitted in any calendar year. The owner must submit the application for any necessary City permits at least six months prior to the event and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Temecula Municipal Code. (Section 13.) 15. RiGht of First Refusal. If the City decides to sell the Parking Lot property to a third party, the owner of Parcel (1) has the right to buy the Parking Lot at the price negotiated with the third party. The owner of Parcel (1) must make its decision within 60 days of notice. The right of first refusal is not applicable to a sale at less than fair market value or with other incentives in connection with a Redevelopment Agency Agreement. (Section 14.) 16. New BuildinGs on Parcel ('1), The Agreement allows the owners of Parcel (1) to construct new buildings or expand existing buildings on Parcel (1) without having to construct additional parking and without loss of any of the parking rights for the Parking Lot. (Section 16.) 17. Insurance. The Agreement requires the City to maintain $5,000,000 liability insurance for liability arising from its operation and maintenance of the Parking Lot but excluding the negligent or wrongful acts of the owner of Parcel (1) or the tenants. If the City cannot obtain such insurance at reasonable rates, it may self-insure. Either the owner of Parcel (1) or its tenants must obtain similar insurance. (Section 17.) 18. Other Easements. The Owner grants the City an easement over the parking areas on Parcel (1) for public parking and the City grants to the owner of Parcel (1) vehicular and pedestrian access easements to Parcel (1) over the Parking Lot, (Section 18.) 19. City AcknowledGemerit of Parking Reauirement Modifications. In Section 19 of the Agreement, the City waives the parking requirements for Parcel 1 and agrees that whether Parcel (1) contains the Stampede or any other use, the public parking on the Parking Lot is sufficient to meet Parcel (1)'s parking reauirements under the Temecula Development Code and the Old Town Specific Ptan. The City also agrees that in approving future developments on Parcel (1) it will not impose parking space requirements and will not deny the project on parking grounds. 20. Property Taxes. The Agreement provides that the City shall pay all taxes assessed against the Parking Lot, provided that if a possessory interest tax is assessed against the owner of Parcel (1) for its interest in the Parking Lot, then the owners of Parcel (1) shall pay the possessory interest tax. (Section 20.) The Purchase Agreement is in the standard form which the City and the Redevelopment Agency have used for the past three years. It provides for a purchase pdce of $600,000 and allows the City to review and approve exceptions to title and conduct soils testing and other investigation on the Parking Lot property. This Purchase Agreement also provides that the current owners of the Property warrant to the City that the property is free of hazardous or toxic substances and that the current owners will indemnify the City for remediation costs and damages if hazardous or toxic substances are later found on the Property. The Purchase Agreement further provides that Escrow must close on or before May 15, 1999 in order to accommodate the concerns of the Seller with its tenants. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $610,000 are available in the Redevelopment Fund for transfer to the General Fund to complete this purchase, including closing and other associated costs. Attachments: A. Resolution No. 99-__ B. Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions C. Agreement and Grant of Real Property Subject to and Reserving Parking Easement """ RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" AND THE PARKING EASEMENTS INCLUDED THEREIN FOR THE PARKING LOT NORTHWESTERLY OF FIRST AND FRONT STREETS IN OLD TOWN THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF TEIVIECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOXVS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and declares that: a. The Old Town Specific Plan and the Redevelopment Plan for the City's Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 provides for the acquisition and development of public parking facilities in Old Town b. The public parking lot proposed to be acquired by this Purchase Agreement is strategically located within the Old Town Area and will serve a portoin of the public parking needs in Old Town. c. The City Council has duly considered all terms and conditions of the proposed Agreement and finds that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency and City and the r~ealth, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements and that tile purchase price for tile acquisition of the parking lot with the reservation of th~ parking easements by the seller is the fair market value of the interests acquired. d. This Agrecmer:t pertains to and affects the ability of all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and to accomplish tr~e goals of the Plan and is illtended to be a contract within the meaning of Government Code Section 53511. Seclion 2. TIle City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds, determines anti decinrcs that: a. This action being taken has been contemplated and described in the Redevelopment Plan for tile City's Redevelopment Project for which a full and complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the Plan. Additionally an environment review was completed and certified in 1994 for the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Since tile preparation and certification of those Environmental Impact Reports, subsequent changes have not been proposed in the subject project or in the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan which will require UUlI411 I 1(l~7-(l(llll)l plnl 14~1051 II important revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts which were not considered in the previous EIR. Additionally, substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Redevelopmerit Plan Amendment has been undertaken which would require important provisions in the previous EIR due to the involvemen't of significant environmental impacts not covered in the previous EIR. Finally, no new information of substantial importance to the area and the Environmental hnpact Report prepared for that area has become available. Moreover, the mitigation measures proposed as part of the Environmental Impact Report for the Old Town Specific Plan have been included, where applicable, in the Project, and such mitigation measures are feasible and further mitigation measures are not required to address concerns raised in the Environmental Impact Report. Theretore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and, specifically, 14 Cal. Admin. 15 162 and 15180, a subsequent Environmental h'npact Report for the subject project is not required, b. Notwithstanding the environmental analysis set forth in subsection a. of tills section. the Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 15302 as a Class 2 categorical exemption (replacement or reconstructior~ of existing facilities) and 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 15304 as a Class 4 categorical exemption (minor alterations to land), because the acquisition and improven~ents set tbrth in the Agreement are to an existing parking lot and the construction will consist of the improvement of the asphalt and lighting at the parking lot. Section 3. The City Council of tile City of Temecula hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" dated as of April 20, 1999, and the "Agreement and Grant of Real Property Subject to and Reserving Parking Easement" referred to therein. with such changes mutually agreed upon by the Seller and the C~i,~v Nlanager as are minor and ip, substantia! co~:brmai~ce with the form of such Agreements as have been sut3mitted herewith. TIle Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Agreements, including related exhibits anti attachments, on behall' of the City. A copy of the final Agreement when executed by the Mayor and attested by tile City Clerk shall be place on file in tile Office of tile City Clerk. Seelion 4. TIle City Manager (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the Citv. to take all actions necessary and a!'mropriate to carrv out and implement the responsibilities and duties to be performed uncter the Agreements and related documents, including but not limited to. escrow instructlolls. certificates of acceptance, and implementing agreements. Seclion 5. TIle City Clerk shall certify tile adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVEI) AND ADOPTED by tile City Council of the City of Temecula on , 1999. ATTEST: STEVEN FORD MAYOR SUSAN JONES, CMC CITY CLERK [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) !, Susan Jones. City Clerk of tile City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Tcmecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on , 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: SUSAN JONES, CMC CITY CLERK 991i411 111187-0()001 i,mfl 141~1(}51 O ' 3 - APR-14-1999 15:21 FROM TO 19096941999~ P.02/13 PURCHASE AND S_ALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREE34ENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS ("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of April 20, 1999 by. and between FIRST & FRONT, a California partnership ("Seller"), and the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation CBuyer"), and constitutes both an agreement to purchase and sell real property between the parties and the parties' escrow instructions directed to First American Title In.~urance Company ("Escrow Holder "). RECITALS A. Seller is the owner of the real property interests describ~xl in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. Seller desires to sell and Buyer desires to buy. the Property on the terms and conditions set forth herein. C. Buyer intends to use the Property for public purposes set forth in Exhibit B, Agreement and Grant of Real Property Subjcct to and Reserving Parking Easement," attached hcreto and made a part hereof. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, operative provisions and the Recitals which are incorporated herein by this reference, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purchase .and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined), Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy the Property from Seller, on the terms and conditions heroinafter set forth and as set forth in Exhibit B. 2. Purchase Price. The total purchase price for the Property to be paid by Buyer is the sum of sbc hundred thousand dollars and no cents ($600,000.00) (the "Purchase Prxce"). which sum shall be paid in full in cas~ on the Close of Escrow. 3. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder shah order from First American Ti~c Company ("Tide Company") a title commitment for the Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments identified as exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing. Escrow Holder shall deliver these insinn-dents and the title commitment to Buyer and Seller. Buycr's fee title to the Property ~" all be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title surancc in the amount of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of ti~e insurance 4/14199 15,806~0.3 H~K--i4--1~ 15:21 FROM TO 19096941999~ P.03/13 provided for pursuant to this Section shall insure Buyer's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all liere, encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following permitted conditions of rifle ("Permitted Ti~e Exceptions"): (a) The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting th~ Property; and (b) Those non-monetary exertions approved by Buyer within fifteen (15) business days after the date Buyer receives the title commitment and legible copies of all instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Buyer unconditionally disapproves any such excep- tions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposita~d timein sl~ll be refunded to Buyer (less Buyer's .~hare of escrOw cancellation charges), and this Agreemere shall be of no further force or effect. If Buyer conditionally disapproves any such ex~ptions, then Seller shall use Seller's best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Buyer may, at Buyer's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow and receive a refund of aU fumts deposited into Escrow (less Buyer's share of escrow cancellation charges), if any, and this Agreement shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close of Escrow, Buyer's fc~ title to the Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances. 4. Grant Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior to the Close of Escrow the "Agreement and Grant of Real Property Subject to and Reserving Parking Easement," as set forth on Exhibit B, duly executed and acknowledged by Seller and Buyer, graming and conveying to Buyer the Property. 5. _Authorization_to Record Documents and Disburse ~unds. Escrow Holder is hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and documents called for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has then been ful~Ilcd: (a) Title Company can issue in favor of Buyer the Policy, showing the Property vested in Buyer subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions. Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain a partial re, conveyance, if necessary, 'of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the Property shall be free and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of EscrOw. (b) Escrow Holder shah have recei,-ed Buver's notice of aDDroyal or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Buyer's oOligat/ons hereunder, ~s'provided for in Section 11; and Section 4. (C) Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed required by ~z4~9 z,sB~o.3 - 2 - MMK--I~--i~ 1~;~ ~RUM TO 19096941999~ P.04/1~ ~_. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorize~l to record at the Close of Escrow any instrun~nt delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed. 6. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow CEscmw') to accommodate the tr~nuction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of this Agreement from Buyer and Seller. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant Deed to Buyer is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside which date shall be on or before May 14, 1999. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage to the Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller. Buyer shall pay all escrow costs. 7. Escrow Charps an_d Prorations. Buyer shall pay for th~ cost of the CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Buyer shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other Iocal u'ansfer taxes, and any other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fail to close through no fauk of either party, Buyer shall pay all Escrow cancellation charges. 8. License to. Enter. Seller hereby grants to Buyer and Buyer's authorized agents, contractors, consulwits, assigns, attorneys, accountants and other representatives an ,~"-~rrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of making inspections and other Kaminations of the Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological tests of the Property and an environmental site assessment thereof. Buyer shall give Seller reasonable notice before: going on the PwperW. Buyer does hereby indemnify and forever save Seller, Sellcr's heirs, successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against any and all liabilky, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property as a result of any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way connected with Buyer's inspections or non-permanent improvements involving enWance onto thc Property pursuant to this Section. If Buyer fails to acquire the Property due to Buyer's default, this license shall terminate upon the termination of Buyer's right to purchase the Property. In such event, Buyer shall removc or cause to be removed all Buyer's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from the Property. 9. Warranties and Representations of Seller. Seller hereby represents and warrants to Buyer the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive the Close of Escrow: (a) That to the best of Sel ler's knowledge, (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free and clear of any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not Iimitecl to, asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes ~" 'd regulations, including environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all businesses on the ,~perty have disposed of their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and 4/]4/99 14~06~9.3 ' 3 - w~-14-i~ 1~:~ FROM TO 19096941999~ P.85/1~ regulations; and (iv) Seller has no notice of any pending or threaened action or proceiling arising out of the condition of the Property or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To this end, it is agr~.~l tint notwithstanding the conveyance of the Property to Buyer, Seller shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Buyer from and against any and all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Property, injuries to or death of persons, or for the cost of clenning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic substances, materials and wast~ therefrom, by reason of con- tamination or adverse effects on the environment, or by mason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, roles or regulations of any governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Property, caused by or resulting from any hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the Close of Escrow. (b) That Seller is the sole owner of the PmperW free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachme:ms from adjacent properties, encroachrnents by improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature, other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller shall not further encumber the Pwperty or allow the Property or to be further encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow. (c) Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder inchcling the transfer of the Property to Buyer, violates or shall viohte any contract, agreement or instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Property, and the sale of the Property herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto. (d) There are no mechanics', materialmen's or similar claims or liens presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work performed or commenced prior to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold Buyer harmless from all costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or any similar lien claimed against the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior to the Close of Escrow. (e) Them are no wrinen or oral leases or contractual fight or option to lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature in and to the Property or any pan thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Property or any pan acreof. (f) Seller has no 'know.~efige of any pending, threatened or potential i:tXgation, acuon or proceeding against SeLler or any other Paxty before any court or administrative tribunal which is in any way related to the Property. 10. Buyer's Contin!~encies' For the benefit of Buyer, the Close of Escrow and the Buyer's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Property shall be contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of all of the foBowing (or Buyer's written waiver thereof, it being agreed that Buyer can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow: H~K'14--i~ 15:23 FRC~ TO 19096941999~ P.~13 (a) That as of the Close of Escww the representations and warranties of feller contained m this Agreement are all true and correct. (b) The delivery of aH documents pursuant to Section 4 hereof. (c) Title Company's commiunent to issue in favor of Buyer of a CLTA Standard Coverage Owner's Policy of Ti~e Insurance with liability equal to the Purchase Price showing Buyer's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions. (d) Buyer 's approval prior w the Close of Escww of any enviroranental sire assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the Property or the underlying real property that Buyer might perform prior to the Close of Escrow. 11. Se!ler's Confineeneies. For the benefit of Seller, the Closing of Escrow and the Seller's obligation to consummate the sale of the Property shall be contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Seller's wrinen waiver thereof, it being agreed that Seller can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow: (a ) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and warranties of Buyer contained in this Agreement are all true and correct. (b) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 4 hereof. (c) Seller and Buyer have approved and executed the parking casement or other agreement described in Section I2. of this Agreement. 12. Aoreement of Parking for Seller's Adjacent Property. Seller owns certain real property which is adjacent to the Property (the "Dominant Tenement" as described in Exhibit B). The Dominant Tenement is and is improved with certain commercial buildings. Although the business tenants on the Dominant Tenement are utilizing the Property to satisfy parking obligations under the City's zoning requirements, the parking capacity of the Property exceeds these requirements and both parties acknowledge that it would be beneficial for the existing and future businesses on the Dominant Tenement and the public to be able to utiliz~ the Property for supplemental parking. Therefore, the parties have negotiated a parking easement to be reserved by the Seller and which provides for reciprocal parking and access fights over the Property and Dominant Tenement for the public and improvement of the parking areas by the Buyer, which agreement is set forth in the "Agreement and Grant of Real Property Subject to and Reserving Parking Easement." attached hcrcto as Exhibit B. Mutual approval and execution of said Agreement shall be a contingency to be satisfied prior to the Close of Escrow; provided, however, that the failure of the parties to reach agreement on such a lease, license or other agreement shall not be considered to be a breach of this Agreement. 13. Certification of Non-Foreign Status. Seller covenants to deliver to Escrow a certification of Non-Foreign Stares in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice .-""'~rsuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 26131, prior to the Close of :row. 4/14/99 14K~89.3 - 5 - HMK--i4--i~ 15:~ hKUM TO 190969~1999~ P.07/13 14. Default. In the event of a breach or default under this Agreement by either Buyer or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the defaulting party and to Escww Holder, and if Buyer is thc non-defaulting party, Buyer shall thereupon promp~y receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the Escrow by a non-defaulting party shall bc without prejudice to the non-defaulting party's rights and remedies at law or equity. 15. Netices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by (i) certified mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, ~at pwvides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or {iii) by personal delivery. Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1) business day followins deposit with an overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sent to Escrow Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shah thereafter be given as demanded in that notice: BUYER: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Ann: City Manager COPY TO: Richards, Watson & C-ershon 3tt So. Hope St., 38th H. Los Angeles, California 90071 Attn: Peter M. Thorson, Esq. SELLER: First & Front Partnership c/o Cleveland Investment Co. 28465 Fwnt Street, Suite 321 T rn cula, Ca. 92590 COPY TO: Maurice Muehle, Esq. Muehle & Whitman 12301 Wiishire B!. . Suite 318 Los Angeles, Ca. 90025-1007 ESCROW HOLDER First American Tide Company 323 West Court Street San Bernardino, California 92401 Anention: Lee Ann Adal'Bs 4114/~9 1480119,3 - 6 - HPK--14--1~ 15:25 FROM TO 19~96941999~ P.08/13 16. Bro. ker's Couunimions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers, agents or ~'mdcrs, licensed or uniicensed, and all claims of real estate or other consultants which exist or may arise as a result of Scllcr's actions with respect to the Property. Buyer shall not be liable for any such fees or claims and ScUcr shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Buyer, its officers, employees and agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or jud~m, ments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in defending or paying any such claims. 17. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF CITY. It is understood and agreed between Seller and Buyer that the payments made to Seller as set forth in this Agreement represent an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertainirtg to the Property and includes and satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property, and specifically inchdes, but is not limited to, claims for scverance and other damages, attorney's fees, interest, expenses of litigation, cxpert's fees, precondcmnation darrmgcs, inverse condemnation, owner participation rights under the Rcdevelopmcnt Plan, rclocation assistance and/or benefits under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of I970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et scq.), if applicable, or under Ti~c 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.), and loss of business goodwill under the F-mincnt Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and expenses whatever in connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Buyer has adviscci Seller of the possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the ~waiver of all rights by Seller hcrein set forth as free and voluntary. 18_ Further Instructional. Each party agrees to execute such other and further escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 19. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only when duly executed by Buyer and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder. 20. Miscellaneous (a) Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted under, and governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of California. (b) Enfir_e Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement, oral or written. and roger_her with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements delivered pursuant hereto, contains the entire agreement between Buyer and Sefier on the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to any employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution hereof Seller and Buyer acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty, guaranty or promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, orcscntation or promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or .ding on Seller or Buyer. 4/14/~ 1480689.~ 7 H~K--i4--1~ 15:24 FROM TO 19096941999~ P.09/13 (c) Successors and Assipm=. This A~t shall be blnd;ng upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, ~c~ministrators, successors and assigns of tim parties hereto. (d) Tim_e d_ ~.ce., The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company's general Escrow instructions. (e) Remedies Net_Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exchsive of any other remedy and each and every remedy sh~ll he cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existinE at hw or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of the fight to pursue other available remedies. (f) Interprets~_on .and Construction. The parties agree that each party has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real estate advisors review and revise this agreement arid that ally rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and "party* include corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or association where ever the context so requires. The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement. (g) City Mans-,er's Authority. The City Manager is hereby directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation, escrow insrotations and amendments thereto. certificates of acceptance, agreements for payments of lost rent, or certificauons, as may be necessary or convenient to implement the tens of this Agreement. 21. Attorneys' Fees. If either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in order to enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or because of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing party, whether by suit, negotiation, arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from the .... ~" par~.' 22. Assigr~ment., Buyer may assign its rights under this Agreement or may designate a nominee tO acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or designation shall not relieve Buyer of any of its obligations under this Agreement. 23. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be concerned with Section 8, 9, I0, and 15 hereof, and Buyer and Seller release Escrow Holder from liability or obligation as to Section 8, 9, 10, and 15 hereof. ~/1,1/99 1480~89.3 - 8 - ~r~-i~-l~ i~4 ~UM TO 19096~41999~ P.10/1~ IN WITNESS WI-W.~F, the parties her~to have executed this Agreemere as of ,he ~y and year first written above. SELLER FIRST & FRONT, a California partnership Name: Title: Name: Tifie: 4/x4/99 H~o(,89.3 - 9 - H~K--14--1~ 15iZ4 FROM TO 190969~1999~ P.11/13 BUYER CITY OF TEMECULA, a mnnlcipal corporation: Stcvcn Ford Mayor ATTEST: By Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Peter M. Thorson City Attorney t-~'K-14--1~ 15:24 FROr"I TO 191~96941999~ P.12/13 EXHIBW A I-EGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY j / APR-14-1999 15:24 FROM TO 19096941999~ P.13/13 AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF REAL PROPERTY SUR/ECT TO AND RESERVING PARKE~'G EASEMr,~T 4114/99 14~X:8~.3 - 124 TOTAL P.13 ~=~ UY;Xerox ielecop~er ?020; 4-14-98; 2:aaPM; 3108200118~ 9086941999;; 2 When Reoo.,'ded Return City Clerk City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 T~mecule, CA 92589-9023 AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF REAL PROPERTY SUBJECT TO AND RE- SERVZNG PARKING EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, FIRST & FRONT, a Califor- nia general partnership, (herein "Grantor") hereby grants and conveys to the CITY OF TEMECULA (herein "Crantee") and its successors and assigns, that real propert~ particularly described in ~xhibit "A" (some- times herein the "Servient Tenement") attached hereto subject to and reserving an easement thereon in favor of Grantor and Grantor~s successors and assigns as the owner of that Real Property of ~he Grantor, contiguous to the Servien= Tenement, and more particularly de- scribed in ~xh~bit "B" attached hereto (herein the "Dominant Tenement"). The Servien~ Tenement as described in Exhibit A con- sists of two contiguous parcels designated therein and herein as Parcel 2 and P~rcei 3. The easement rights being reserved herein include the non-exclusive right of the Grantor, and its successors and assigns as the owner in fee of the Dominann Tene- ment, and the tenan=s, servants, visitors, invitees, licensees, visitors of ~he tenants, invitees of the tenants and licensees of the ~enants of the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement, to park motor vehicles of' all kinds thereon, at all times of the day or night, free of any charge in connection with the uses on the Dominant Tenant whatsoever, and to have commercially reasonable access ~hereto for such purposes. The Grantee accepts the Grant of title to the Servient Tenement and for itself and its successors and assigns does acknowledge the reservation of an easement as pro- vided for herein and the parties further agree as fol- lows: 1. Purpose ofthe Sewie~Tenement. Grantee covenants for ~tself and its successors and assigns t_hat, except as otherwise provided herein concerning the conetruc~ion of improvements with respect to Parcel 3, ~he Servient Page I of ~12 toll pages 0chi uY;Xer0x ~e~ec0p~er ?020; 4-14-99; 3:OdPM; 3108200118* 9096941999;~ 1 Tenement and all portions thereof shall always be main- tained at all times in the future as a public parking lot for motor vehicles and for no other purpose. Should the Servient Tenement not be so maintained as a ,.~ vdhioles. ~tle l~ te~ public parking ~o~ ~u~ thereto shall revert to the then owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement- Before title and fee shall revert to the T_hen owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement as provided for herein, the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement or the duly appointed agent =hereof shall pro- vide the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement with no- tice of the violation giving rise to the reversion and =he owner in fee of the Servient Tenement shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure the default, if it can be cured, and if not cured within said thirty (30) day period, title in fee to the Servient Tenement shall automatic revert to the =hen owner in fee of the Domi- nant Tenement- 2. Free Ps~ine. Except as otherwise provided herein concerning the construction of improvements with re- spect to par~ei 3, the owner in fee of ~he Servient Tenement shall allow free parking of motor vehicles on the Servient Tenement at all times of the day and nigh= by the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and by all tenants of the Dominant Tenement, and by all customers, employees, and persons dealing with the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and by all customers, employees, and persons dealing with tenants of the Dominant Tene- ment in connection with all uses on the Dominant Tene- ment. The owner of =he Servient Tenement s~all refrain from taking any action that would impair or diminish any of the easement rights provided for herein. 3. S~fficientS~aces. Subject to the rights of the owner of =he Dominant Tenement as set forUh in Section 9, 12 and 19 below, the owner of the Servient Tenement shall take all necessary actions to assure that in the Servi- ant Tenement is developed and thereafter maintained with as many parking spaces as is practicable given the parking space size, parking loU landscaping, and turn- ing aisle requirements of Title 17, Development Code, of the Temecula Municipal Code-" ~. No Build!~osorStmc~s. Excep~ as provide~ sections 9 and 12 herein, no buildings or other structures shall be cons~ztacted or placed on the servient Tenemen~ ex- cept as reasonably required for the management and ad- ministration of the Servient Tenement as a public park- ing lo=, and for no other purpose. 5. SIn~s. The owner in fee of the Servient Tenement shall allow the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement to place any prominent sign on the Servient Tenement at Psge 2 of 12 total pages ~c~; UY;xerox lemecop~er 'IUZu; ~-1~-99; I:5~PM; ~108200118~ 80g6B41BaB;~ 4 each access/egress point explaining that parking available to Dominant Tenement. No such signs inshall be in a size in excess of 4 feet by 3 feet and each such sign shall in any event conform to all local signage ordinances. Although such parking will in fact be free, no sign shall be placed on the Dominant Tenement stating that such parking is free; but a sign on the Dominant Tene- ment may state that parking is available on the Servi- ant Tenement to customer of business located on the Dominant Tenement. 6. Pmcedums. The owner in fee of the Servient Tene- ment, at its own expense, shall establish commercially reasonable procedures to assure that customers of the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and customers of all tenants of the Dominant Tenement will have accems to free parking privileges as provided for herein. 7. Maln~nanceofSe~ientTenement. The Owner in fee of the Servient Tenement e~all maintain the parking lot per City of Temecula standards using the same operations and maintenance procedures and not less than the level of care as the existing City of Temecula public parking lot on sixth Street in Old Town Temecula and in connec- tion therewith, the owner in fee of the Servient Tene- ment, at its own eMpense, shall maintain and keep the Servient Tenement in good order and condition for park- ing purposes with a hard-top surface pavement and prop- erly striped, clean of all debris, ice, end snow. The owner in fee of the Servient Tenement, at its own ex- pense, shall maintain sufficient floodlights and other means of illumination to illuminate the Servient Tene- ment during all twilight and evening hours when commer- cial activity is taking place on the Dominant Tenement in accordance with all federal, state and local law and in no event shall the illumination be less thor, the il- lumination provided for in the public parking lot on Sixth Street and Old Town Temecula. The owner in fee of the Servient Tenement, at its own expense, shall re- move all papers, debris, filth, and refuse from the Servient Tenement on a regular basis so as to maintain the paTk~nq 1~ su~[aee in a neat, uluan, and orderly condition. The owner in fee of the Servient Tenement, at its own expense, shall maintain the ground surfaces of the Servient Tenement in a level, smooth, and evenly covered condition (including without limiting the gen- erality of the foregoing in full compliance with all Federal and State statutes and local ordinances includ- ing full compliance with ADA specifications end all provisions of the American Disabilities Act) with high quality and durable surfacing material. The owner in fee of the Servient Tenement, at ~_ts own expense, shall place, repair, and replace any necessary and approDri- Pa$1e 3 of f2 total pages ~cNt ~Y;Xer0x 'ielec0pier ?020; 4-14-99; 1:56PM; 3108200118- 90989~1998;; 5 ate directions1 signs, markers, and lines and any arti- ficial lighting facilities that are reasonably re- quired. 8. Con/mction on Seff~ntTenement. All construction of parking improvements by the Grantee or owner of the 8ervient Tenement on the Servient Tenement and on the Dominant Tenement shall be undertaken and promptly and diligently in a manner so as not to unrea- sonably impair the day to day business of the Grantor or Tenants of the Dominant Tenement. In order to re- duce the effects of construction within the parking ar- eas on the business of the Grantor or Tenants of the Dominant tenement, the Grantee agrees to: (1) prepare a construction schedule and written plan to mitigate the impact on Grantor and Tenants of the Dominant Tenement during construction and provide a copy of the construc- tion schedule and mitigation plan to the Grantor and Tenants of the Dominant Tenement not less that fifteen days prior to the commencement of construction; limit construction aotivities to Monday through Thurs- day, with no construction activities on Fridays, Satur- days or Sundays, except for emergency repairs; and (3) fill trenches for lighting conduit or cover them with steel plates so as to allow vehicle and pedestrian t~avel ~ver them if w~=k is le~ uneemploted on 3 Fri- day, Saturday or Sunday. In the event that construc- tion on the parking areas will prevent the use of twenty-tour (24) O~ ~o~e spaces on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday, then Grantee shall provide the owner of the Dominant Tenement and the Tenants of the Dominant Tene- ment and their respective visitors, invitees and cue- ~omers winn rne same number o~ commerc~a11~ re~sonubl~ alternative parking spaces in close proximity ~o Servient Tenement as may be made unavailable due to constru~ti~n. Q~an~es shull improve and maintain the purkln areas on the Dominant Tenement in the sums man- no~ ~n~ qu~litp the lmDTn~rementS tn The D~I~G on ~he Servient T&nemeR~ at Re e~pense ~o. the owner of the Dominant Tenement. All Drainage on the Dominant Tenement and Servient Tenement shall drain away from the improvements on the Dominant Tenement. Nothing contained herein, however, shall be construed aG obli- gations zne owner of the D~mlnan; Tenement to ;on~lnue =u use =he existing parking areas on the Dominant Tene- ment for parking purposes and in the event the owner of the Dominant Tenement tunwarts the existing parking area ~hereon to a different use, all easement rights of ~he owner of the Servient Tenement shall be automati- cally extinguished. 9, Constm~ion on Parcel3. Buildings may be constructed on P~rcel 3 of the Servient Tenement for purposes other than t/~e management and administration of the Servient Page 4 of 12 total pages ~=Ni ~y;Xerox telecop~er ?gZg. i 4~14-98; 2:42PM; 3108200118~ 9096941999;~ 6 Tenement as a parking lot, Any pOrtion of Parcel ] of the 8ervitm~ Tenement not improved with such a building shall remain as a parking lot and shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement and to the parking easement rights of the owner of the Dominant Tenement its tenant and the customers of said owner and the tenants of said owner. 10. ~-mm MuniciDalWalrDi~HotLl~StaUon. If the =asteEn Xualoipal Water District L~ft Station is reiDcared to a new location and if the city of Temecula acquires the Mastezn Municipal Water Distric~ Lift Station property, the City of Temecula shall add additional public park- ing within the Bastern Municipal Water DiStrict Lift Station area, which such public parking shall be avail- able at no charge to the Owner of the Dominant Tenement and to the tenants and Owner or tenants as provided in this agreement. How- ever, the City of Temecula is not required to acquire the Beater= Municipal Wa~e: DistriCt Lift Station prop- ias~erm XUAiOipl~ wafer DiSfriar Li~t eriC/on property and the Owner of the Dominant Tenement does, then the City of Temecula will grant access and free parking rights to the Owner of the Dominant Tenement and to the ~enanes an~ eus%emo~u ana ~nvztocu or trio ton--rite or ~he DamOnaLe Taneman~ ao~egs ~a~oel 2 of the Earyacht Tenement to the Station property. 11. All~nmentofFi~t )restPrides. When Pi~st Street ltgned along with the ~irst Street ~rldge proJect,.the City of Temecula will add additional public parking ad- jacent to the new realignment of Firs~ Street as appro- priate and all such public parking will be made avail- able to the Owner of the Dominant Tenement and to the tenants and customers and invitees of t~e tenants of the Dominant Tenement free of charge as provided in =his Agreement. 12. Sub~ltutePa~inn Re Parcel2. Buildings may be con- structed on Parcel 2 of the Servient Tenement for pur- poses o'her ~han t~e management and administration of ~he Servient Tenement as a parking lo~ under ~he fol- following terms and conditions only: The most south easterly portion .of Parcel 2 of the Servient Tenement fronting First Street and the northerly 150 feet shall not be improved and no buildings or structures of any kind whatsoever shall be constructed thereon and said portion of P~rCel 2 of the Servient Tenement shall always re- main a driveway for entering and exiting the ser- vient Tenement. Page 5 of 12 total pages coN; uY:xerox ~elecop~er...?~2O; 4-14-8~; 2:4~P.M; ............... ql.0p.2pO.!~ ..................g~,~6,_9~999;n ? Zf a building or structure to be constructed on Parcel 2 of the Servient Tenement shall have the effect of reducing the number oZ parking spaces thereon, the owner ~f the Servient Tenement shall notify in writing the owner of the Dominant Tene- ment at least one year prior to the proposed con- struction and said notice shall be accompanied by a set of plans clearly showing the number o~ park- ing spaces that will be abandoned or eliminated by reason o~ the proposed construction. The owner of Parcel 2 of the Servient Tenement shall under no circumstances be entitled to com- mence construction until and unless it shall have provided a number of parking spaces equal to the number of parking spaces to be abandoned or elimi- nated by reason of said construction and said sub- stitute parking ~paces shall in any event be lo- cated within three hundred (300) feet from the Dominant Tenement. All such substitute parking spaces shall be contiguous and shall not be street parking. Further such substitute parking spaces shall not be located on the West Side of the creek. Further, all such substitute parking spaces shall be visible from Front Street and shall be accessible from Front Street. The owner of Parcel 2 of the Servient Tenement shall also provide at its mole expense prominen~ signage adadvertising that much parking is available and is free· All such substitute parking spaces shall be lo- cated in a parking lot that shall consist of and contain an imprcvemen~ level equal to or beztcr than the parking area of Parcel 2 of the Servient Tenement and shall have an asphalt surface, curb and gutter and lighting of the same or greater quality than on Parcel 2. Without in any way limiting the generality of the obligations of the owner of the Servient Tenement as set forth herein, the parking lot in which the ='~~='="'~e p~iin? ~;ill be lec=ted will be main- halned by the Owner of the Servient Tenement in the same or better condition than said owner is required to maintain the Servient Tenement. such new substitute parking spaces shall be com- pleted and available for parking at least thirty (30) days prior to the abandonment or elimination of the parking spaces in Parcel 2 on the Servient Tenement. Page 6 of 12 total paps bY;Xerox leleco~ier ?020; 4-14-99; 1:59PM; 3108200118~ 9096941899;8 8 Any construction of improvements on Parcel 2.of the SeTvien~ Tenement shall be done in such a man- net so as not ~o unreasonably interfere with the business operations occurring on the Dominant Tenement. loved to place signage on the Dominant Tenement and on the Servient Tenement and on the parking lee een~aizia~ all su~seleuee pa~kiR~ places fying customers of any business located on the Dominant Tenement that parking is available in said places for the benefit of said customers. None of the signs shall be of a size in excess of 4 feet by 3 feet and all such signs shall conform to local signage ordinances. 13. SDeclslEven~ Permit, Subject to the applicable provi- sions of the Temecula Municipal Code, ~he owner of the Dominant Tenement shall have the right to utilize up to twenty five (25%) of the entire parking easement on an exclusive basic ~or not more ~nan ~wo (2) epecla~ events in any calendar year provided that maid Owner= special event permits and pays the fees or charges that are required, and (ii) provides the owner of the Servi- ant Tenement with at least mix (6) months prior written notice of any such special event. 14, Rioht ~ FimtRe~sal. Should the Owner of the Servient Tenement decide to sell the Servient Tenement or any portion thereof or the parking lot in which substitute parking is located or any portion thereof, the Owner of the Dominant Tenement shall first be given the opportu- nity to purchase said real property for the price and on the same terms as offered by any third party and the Owner of the Dominant Tenement shall have sixty (60) days in which to make its decision to purchase and no sale to a third party shall be valid for any purpose whatsoever unless there has been compliance with the procedures set forth herein. If the Owner of the Domi- nant Tenement does not exercise its right to purchase said real property under this right of first refusal, the Owner of the ServienE Tenement shall have the right for a period of nineEy (90) days only in which to com- plete the sale of said realty to the thiTd party pro- ~rlGe, ~erm~ an~ Ggngl~lon~ grigin~y ~ =or=n. right of first refusal in the Owner of the Dominant Tenement as set forth herein shall not be applicable if the Grantee (i) sells the Servient Tenement to a third party at a price below market value or with other in- centives in a transaction tied to or directly connected Page 7 of 12 total pages ~N1SY:XoPox ToloeopLeP V0~0; 4-14-00; 2:00PM; 3108~00118~ 0006041000;# 0 wlth a Redevelopment AOency agreement, or (ii) conveys the property dlrectly to the Redevelopment Agency. 15, Runs VViththeljnd. All obligations of the Owner of th~ ~ervient as set forth herein ohall be btRdiR~ upeR all successor owners of said real property. The obli- gations of ~he Servient Tenement run with the real property and in the event of a material breach of said obligations, full title thereto shall revert to the owner of the Dominant Tenement. Before title in fee shall revert to the then owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement as provided for herein, the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement or the duly appointed agent thereof shall provide the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement with notice of the violation giving rise to the reversion and the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure the default if it can be cured, and if not cured within said thirty (30) day period, title in fee to the Servi- ant Tenement shall automatic revert to the then owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement. 16. No Diminution ofRIoMs. Modifications to the improve- ments on the Dominant Tenement, including the creation of new structures, the destrUCtion of old structures, additions to existing .and new structures, including but not limited to improvements by either the owner of the Dominant Tenement or the tenants of the Dominant Tens~ ment, special use improvements or alterations, remodel- ing, multiple uses with multiple tenants, reconstruc- tion of the improvements, including the existing build- ing on the Dominant Tenement shall not impair the ease- ment rights, as provided herein, of the owner of the Dominant Tenement or the tenant; of the Dominant Tene- ment, cr the visitors, invitees or cusZomers of owner of the Dominant Tenement or the tenants of Domi- nant Tenement. 17, Insu~nce. The owner in fee of the Servient Tene- ment, at its own expense, shall at all times maintain for the mutual benefit of City of Temecula and the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and all tenant; of the Dominant Tenement, general public liabil~ty and property damage insurance covering ~he entir~ Servient ~enemenz Indemnifying nhe owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and all tenants of the Dominant Tenement and holding it harmless from any liability for personal in- Jury, death, or property damage arising on servient Tenement or out of the operations or activities on the parking area except for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the owner of the Dominant Tenement or Tenants of the Dominant Tenement with limits of five million dollars ($5,000,00o~'for personal in3ury or death and of One million dollars ($1,000,000) for prop- Page 8 d 12 total pages BY:Xerox Tetec0pier ?020; 4-14-99; 2:46PM; 3108200118~ 9096941999;~10 arty damage, and upon request the Owner in fee of the Servient Tenement shall furnish the Owner in fee of the Dominant Tenant with certificates evidencing the ex- istence of the required insurance. The owner or the tenant or tenants of the Dominant Tenement shell pur- chase and maintain the insurance with the same limits covering the entire Dominant Tenement indemnifying the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement and holding it harmless from any liability for personal injury, death, or proper damage arising on the Dominant Tenement or out of operations or activities on the Dominant Tene- ment except for the negligent or wrongful acts or omis- sions of the owner of the Servient Tenement and upon request the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement will furnish the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement with a certificate evidencing the existence of the required insurance. If the City of Temecula cannot obtain such insurance at reasonable rates, it may self-insure. This option to self-insure under =he conditions set forth herein shall be applicable to the City of Teme- cula and the Redevelopmen= Agency only and not to any other successor owners of the Servient Tenement. All such successor owners, excepting only the Redevelopmen= Agency under the conditions set forth above, of the servient Tenement shall provide for the insurance cov- erage set forth herein. 18. OffierEasemenm, The Grantor, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns as owners of the Domi- nant Tenement, and the tenants, servants, visitors, in- vatsee, licensees of the tenants of the Dominant tene- ment, further reserves an easement for the ingress and egress of vehicles and pedestrians from First Street and Front Street over and across the Servient Tenement to and from the Dominant Tenement. Subject to =he pro- visions of Section 8, the Grantor, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns as owners of the Domi- nant Tenement hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for public parking on the parking areas of the Dominant Tenement, which parking areas shall be improved and maintain by Grantee at its sole expense in accordance with the same standards, and subject to the same rights and obligations, as Grantee will improve and maintain t/~e Servien~ Tenement pursu- ant to this Agreement 19. Acknowle4"me~ofAIt/~ved Patina ReQulmmen~. The City of Temecula agrees and covenants =hat present usage of the Dominant Tenement is in conformity and will be in conformity with all zoning ordinances and use permits presently or at any time in the future in existence and that so long as the present or related usages continue to exist, no action shall be taken by the City of Teme- cula to place further restrictions upon the use of the Page 9 of 12 total page BY:Xerox Telecopier ?020; 4-14-99; 2:49PM; 3108200118~ 9096941999;~11 Dominant Tenement and in that respect the City of Tame- cola agrees that the parking space on the Dominant Tenement together with all parking rights in Parcel 2 and all substitute parking rights as more particularly set forth here will be adequate and meet all city stan- dards and city requirements for parking now or in the future. The execution of the within instrument shall in no way adversely affect the usage rights of the owner of the Dominant Tenement and may not be used as a reason to place any restriction on future usages. Ir- respective of the uses of the Dominant Tenement, the City of Temeeula will not make any modifications to the parking requirements for the Dominant Tenement, nor shall it modify the building usage or occupancy re- quirements for the Dominant Tenement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the City of Tamecola shall not now or at any time in the future require ad- ditional parking or additional parking improvements in respect of the Dominant Tenement irrespective of whether the owner of the Dominant Tenement modifies any portion of the existing building or replaces the exist- zng building with an entirely different structure or changes the use of any structure on the Dominant Tene- ment. Darther, it is understood and agreed that in the event that the Dominant Tenement is used partially or in whole for retail usage and/or any and all usages provided for in the general plan (including zoning, conditional use permits and/or special uses), the owner of the Dominant Tenemen~ and the Dominant Tenement shall be conclusively deemed to be in full compliance with all parking requirements of the City of Tamsouls. 20. PmMmTaxe., The owner in fee of the-Servient Tenemen~ shall and does hereby indemnify and hold the Owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and all tenants of the Dominant Tenement safe and harmless from all property taxes assessed upon the Servient Tenement. If a possessory interest tax is assessed against the owner of the Dominant Tenement with respect to the easement interest in the Servient Tenement, the owner of the Do- minant Tenement shall pay such tax. If a possessory interest tax is assessed against the owner of the Ser~ Vient Tenement with respect to its easement in tke Dominant Tenement, the owner of the Servien= Tenement shall pay such tax. .~1, Amendment orTerlttlnatlon. The Easement provided for herein may be amended or'~odified only upon a writing duly approved and executed by all parties then holding fee title to the Servient Tenement and the Dominant Tenement and duly recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County, California. Page 10 of 12 total page~ S~NT By:xerox Telecopier ?020; 4:1.4:9.9; 2:51PM; 3~.B200118~ .90~.8~.1.9.9~;~12 99. ;xec~ionofOtherln,mrnehts, Deeds, Ete. The parties hereto covenant f~ themselves and their respective successors and assigns to execute such other instru- ments, deeds, documents and writings as may be reasona- bly and co~eroially necessary or desirable in order to carry out the intentions of the parties as more par- ticularly set forth herein. 23. I~un~lveRellef. The Owner of the Dominant Tenement and all tenants of the Dominant Tenement shall have the authority and standing to enforce the covenants and ob- ligations of the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement as provided heroin and in that respect the owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement and the tenants of the Domi- nant Tenement shall have the right, in addition to dam- ages, to obtain appropriate injunctive relief to assure that the owner in fee of the Servient Tenement complies with the terms, provisions and covenants contained in this instrument. Prior to the filing of a suit for damages by the owner of the Dominant Tenement against the owner of the Servient Tenement or by the owner of the Servient Tenement against the owner of the Dominant Tenement, written notice must be given to t. he alleged violator or breaching party and the alleged breaching party or violators shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure or mitigate damage and no such suit shall be filed until the expiration of said thirty (30) days. No such written notice need be given if such a party seeks equitable or injunctive relief. 24. BInding on Su;cesso~. The Easement and all other rights set forth herein shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns in fee title interest of the Dom!nant Tenemen~ and Setvisa= Tenement and to the ten- ants of =he Dominant Tenement Servient Tenement and their respective visitors, invitees and customers and shall inure to and pass with the conveyance of title to each and every portion of the Dominant Tenement. 24. A~omevs'Fees. In the event suit is brought for the interpretation or enforcement of this instrument, the prevailing part~ shall be entitled to recover its rea- sonable azzorneys fees and costs. 2~. Entlm ArtmemoS. This instrument supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, be- tween the parties hereto with respect. to the subject matter hereof and contains all of the covenants end agreements between the parties with respect to that subject matter. 26. Effe~ of Walve~ The failure of =he owner in fee of the Dominant Tenement to insist on strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants, or condit~ons of this Page 11 of 12 total pages o=~ bY;xerox teiecop~er 'IUZU; ~-14-~; 2:OSPM; 3108200118~ 9096941999;~13 instrument shall not be deemed a waiver of that term, covenant, or condition, nor shall any waiver or relin- quishment of any right or power at any one time or times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of ~hat right or power for all or any other times. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Deed, Agreement and Reservation and Creation of Easement has been executed on April _, 1999. -Orantor- FIRST & FRONT, a General Partner- ship, By, Temeoula Investment Company, Zne., a California Corporation, oene~al Partner Byz liege, Bpperson, President and byz Cleveland Investment Inc., a California Corporation, Oeneral Partner Bye Nail Cleveland, President "Grantee" CITY OF TEMECULA atevan Ford, Mayor And NOTA~IAL ACI(NOWT.~.nCM~.NTS CLEVE~FRBTFRN~SEMENT4.-14 Page 12 of 12 toM/pages TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MARCH 23, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:44 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California. President Comerchero presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, and Comerchero. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve minutes of February 18, 1999. Award of Construction Contract for the Tennis Court Li.qhtincl at Temecula Valley High School- Project No. PW98-10CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award a construction contract for the Tennis Court Lighting at Temecula Valley High School - Project No. PW98-10CSD - To Mega Electric Company in the Amount of $122,038.75 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the Contingency amount of $12,203.88 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Authorization to bid and determination of Cate.qorical Exemption for the Construction of a half-court basketball court and related appurtenances at Butterfield Staqe Park RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Determine that the construction of a half-court basketball court and related Appurtenances at Butterfield Stage Park is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15305 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines; 2 3 Minutes.csd\032399 1 3.2 Authorize the filing of a Notice of Exemption with the appropriate filing fee for the project with the County Clerk of Records Office; 3.3 Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release of a formal public bid for the construction of a half-court basketball court and related appurtenances at Butterfield Stage Park. MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. I - 3. The motion was seconded by Director Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DISTRICT BUSINESS Namine of the Temecula Valley Museum Rotunda RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve a recommendation from the Community Services Commission to Name the Temecula Valley Museum Rotunda in honor of Tony and Mildred Tobin. Referencing the Community Services Commission's recommendation, Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (as per agenda material). In light of Mr. and Mrs. Tobin's vision and preservation of artifacts, Director Stone offered the following motion: MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Lindemans who abstained. Clarifying his abstention, Director Lindemans noted that, in his opinion, such an honor should not occur until the individual being honored has deceased. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Community Services Director Parker invited the community to the upcoming Spring Egg Hunts. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT General Manager Nelson noted that the approved tennis court lighting project will provide eight a.dditi~ar lit tennis cou,-ts to the City's ove-a!l Dark syste-- C:'mmen<-~ on t:- ~: :ac:er.~7. e -= ........... = ~,,y . ,== ~ ~= ......... , J's["~L Llr. Xelscn notec :nat [n:5 projet: is just another example of the benefits derived as a result of such an agreement. Director Stone noted that, after its 10t~ match, the Temecula Valley High School Tennis Team is undefeated. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. Minutes.csd\032399 2 ADJOURNMENT At 7:48 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 13, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd\032399 3 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APRIL 13, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:51 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Comerchero presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, and Comerchero. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENTCALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve minutes of February 23, 1999; 1.2 Approve minute of March 2, 1999. ,Award of Construction Contract for the RotaN Park Improvement Project - Proiect No. PW98-0,gCSD - for the Temecula Commumtv Center RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award a construction contract for the Rotary Park Improvement Project - Project No. PW98-09CSD - for the Temecula Community Center to J.K. Weigle Engineering Contractor in the amount of $22,561.40 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 2.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,256.14 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 2. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Minutes.csd~041399 I PUBLIC HEARING 3 Crowne Hill/Tract No. 23143 - Public Hearina for Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D Rates and Charaes ('located on the east side of Butterfield Staae Road, south of Pauba Road) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Conduct a Public Hearing in connection with the Levy of Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D Rates and Charges, and tabulate written protests; 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY DISTRICT ADOPTING SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 23143 AND ITS SUBSEQUENT PHASES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 3.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 1999, REGARDING SERVICE LEVEL B AND SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 23143 AND ITS SUBSEQUENT PHASES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B AND SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 PURSUANT TO ARTICLES XIIID, SECTION 6, OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION 3.4 Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return, and Tabulation of the Ballots. 3.5 Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners aurstJant to the aforementionea process. Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (of record). President Comerchero opened the public hearing. District Secretary Jones noted that no written protests have been received with regard to this Agenda Item. There being no public input, he closed the public hearing. Minutes .csd\041399 2 MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 Facility Use Ac~reement - James L Day Middle School RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the agreement for the joint use of athletic fields and parking lots at James L. Day Middle School in the Campos Verdes development. The parties to this agreement are the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD). Development Services Administrator Holmes reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the approval of this item would add an additional nine acres of improved parkland to the City's park system and that this park will have the same hours of operation as the other City parks. With regard to the future review of lighting for this particular project, President Comerchero requestedthat the notification process be expanded to ensure that all potentially impacted individuals are properly notified of the plans. Director Roberts apprised staff and the School District of additional funding which will be available through the Riverside County Transportation Committee. Director Stone commended the Community Services Commission on a job well done. MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CommuniTy Services Director Parker invited the community to the Margarita Community Park Dedication Ceremony on Thursday, April 22, 1999, at 10:00 A.M. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT General Manager Nelson extended appreciation and commended the School District for its support and associated efforts with the joint use agreement at James L. Day Middle School. ~?-"~D OF DZRES'J-RS' REPOR'S No comments. Minutes.csd\041399 3 ADJOURNMENT At 8:00 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 20, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd\041399 4 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 23, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:48 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, and Lindemans. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None. Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve minutes of February 18, 1999. 2 GrantinCl of an Easement for the Rancho California Water District RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES AND RELATED APPURTENANCES FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE MISSION VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Minutes.rda\032399 1 AGENCY BUSINESS 3 Al~Droval of funds for eml}lovees of Toybox Creations, Inc. to I:>articil3ate in the Eml31ovee Relocation Loan Proclram RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING UP TO $30,000 OF EMPLOYEE RELOCATION PROGRAM FUNDS FOR LOANS TO EMPLOYEES OF TOYBOX CREATIONS, INC. Assistant City Manager O'Grady presented the staff report (as per agenda material), briefly reviewing the repayment schedules of the loan and advising that as security for the City, there will be a recorded lien against the Deed of Trust. Agency Member Ford reiterated that the funds provided are by way of a loan of up to $15,000 per employee with a maximum relocation fund of up to $30,000. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comments. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. Minutes.rda\032399 2 ADJOURNMENT At 7:52 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 13, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel Lindemans, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.rda\032399 3 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APRIL 13, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:00 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, and Lindemans. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None. Also present were ExecUtive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve minutes of February 23, 1999; 1.2 Approve minutes of March 2, 1999. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comments. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS Agency Member Stone invited the public to Western Days festivities in Old Town on April 17 and 18, 1999. Minutes. rda\041399 1 ADJOURNMENT """ At 8:01 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 20, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel Lindemans, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] Minutes,rda\041399 2 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~'/~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Agency Members Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Mana~ April 20, 1999 Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for the Purchase of a Parking Lot in Old Town RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency Board: Approve an agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula to fund the purchase and construction of a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in Old Town Temecula. 2. Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report. 3. Transfer $900,000 from the Redevelopment Agency to the City's Capital Improvement Project Fund. BACKGROUND: In a separate City Council Agenda Report, it was recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an agreement to purchase a parking lot northwesterly of First and Front Streets in Old Town Temecula, and the expenditure of $610,000 for the purchase of this parking lot. In addition to the purchase cost of $610,000, it is estimated that construction improvements to the parking lot will total $290,000, for a total estimated project cost of $900,000. The Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33220, authorizes and encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to assist each other and to cooperate in the planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. The Old Town Specific Plan and the Redevelopment Agency's Implementation Plan call for the development of public parking lots in the Old Town Area. By purchasing and constructing the parking lot northwesterly of Front and First Streets, the City of Temecula will be providing a strategically located parking lot that will satisfy a large portion of the parking needs in the southern end of Old Town· The attached "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for the purchase and funding of the parking lot located northwesterly of Front and First Streets will implement the funding plans of the City and the Agency for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $900,000 have previously been appropriated in the Redevelopment Agency Capital Improvement Project Fund. These funds will be transferred to cover all project costs. Attachments: A. Cooperative Agreement COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PARKING LOT LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF FRONT AND FIRST STREETS IN OLD TOWN TEMECULA. THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT made and effective as of April 20, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each party finds and determines to be tree and correct: a, The Community Redevelopment Law Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. b, The Old Town Specific Plan, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Redevelopment Agency' s Implementation Plan call for the development of public parking lots in the Old Town Area. Purchase and construction of the parking lot located northwesterly of Front and First Streets in Old Town Temecula within the Project Area will provide substantial parking that will satisfy a large portion of the parking needs in the southern end of Old Town and is therefore of benefit to the Project Area. No other reasonable means of financing the purchase and construction of this parking lot are available to the community. e, The purchase and construction of the public parking lot will assist in the elimination of blight in the Project Area. The City and the Agency agree to cooperate and share responsibility for the purchase of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. o The City shall undertake the following responsibilities with respect to the parking lot purchase: Prepare the necessary engineering and other reports necessary to complete the purchase. Acquire the propen>' for the parking lot. c. Complete the construction of the parking lot in the southern end of Old Town. The City shall pay for the purchase and construction of the parking lot, including all closing and associated costs. The Agency shall reimburse the City for all payments made to complete the purchase and construction of the parking lot. The Acting City Manager, upon the recommendation of the Director of Finance, shall determine the allocation of costs between the City and Agency pursuant to this Agreement and his or her determination shall be final. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA Steven J. Ford, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, Agency Secretary Approved as to Form: P~ter M. Thorson. Citx Attomev/Aeencv General Counsel ITEM 3 CITY COUNCIL/TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/Gity Council Executive Director/Agency Members John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopmerit Manager,.,..._~l~//~ April 20, 1999 Habitat for Humanity - Disposition and Development Agreement Prepared By: Joyce Powers, Senior Redevelopment Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolutions Entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AP- PROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY" DATED AS OF APRIL 20, 1999 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1--1988 RESOLUTION NO. RDA99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVEL- OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY" DATED AS OF APRIL 20, 1999 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1--1988 R:powersj\Habitat for Humanity\DDA staff report 1 BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency purchased the property at 42220 Sixth Street in December, 1997 for the development of affordable housing. The attached DDA, if approved, will convey this site to Habitat for Humanity, a non-profit housing organization, for the sale price of $10.00. There will be no further financial assistance offered by the City or the Agency as a result of the DDA. Habitat, the developer, will then divide the. 19 acre parcel and develop the site. Using volunteer labor and other donations of money and materials, two single-family residences of approximately 1,000 square feet will be constructed. Habitat for Humanity will select the families to whom the homes will be sold after they have met their "sweat equity" requirements. The DDA requires that the families be of very low income (50% of median). Title to the property will be conveyed to Habitat for Humanity within 60 days of the execution of the DDA, and construction must commence within 60 days of the conveyance. The DDA further requires that Habitat complete construction of the on-site and off-site improvements no later than six months following commencement of construction. Completing the development of the site will assist the Agency in accomplishing its goal of increasing the supply of low and moderate income housing as well as eliminate blight in the area, as outlined in the Housing Element of the General Plan. FISCALIMPACT: The General Fund and Redevelopment Agency funding will not be impacted by this project. ATTACHMENT: City Resolution Redevelopment Agency Resolution Disposition and Development Agreement R:powersj\Habztat for Humanity\DDA staff report 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY" DATED AS OF APRIL 20, 1999 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1--1988 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and declares that: a. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency duly organized and existing under the Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council of the City of Temecula. b. On June 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside adopted Ordinance No. 658 adopting and approving the "Redevelopment Plan for Riverside County Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988" (hereafter the "Plan")in accordance with the provisions of the CRL. On December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was incorporated. The boundaries of the Project Area described in the Plan are entirely within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. On June 14, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinances Nos. 91-08, 91-11, 91-14, and 91- 15 establishing the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan from the County to the City. Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 91-11 and 91-15. the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City -' Temecula assumed jurisdiction over the Plan as of July 1, 1991. c. The project proposed by Inland Valley Habitat for Humanity ("Developer") pertains to property located at 42220 Sixth Street in the City of Temecula ("Site"), which is within the Project Area. d. The project to be constructed on the Site pursuant to this Agreement will be a two unit housing project with ~ne sale of the units limited by a recorded agreemere To persons of low ~ncome as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50093. e. Pursuant to the provisions of Health & Safety Code Sections 33430 and 33431, the Agency duly noticed and held a joint public hearing before the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the City Council of the City of Temecula concerning the approval of the proposed Disposition and Development Agreement with Developer. R: Resos/99- 1 f. The Project is a "small housing project" as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 33013. Therefore the report and the findings concerning the market value and reuse value of the Site normally required by Health and Safety Code Section 33433(a) and (b) is not required for this Project as the Agency has adopted a resolution authorizing the sale of the property pursuant to Section 33433(c). g. The Agreement is consistent with the Implementation Plan adopted by the Agency on November 29, 1994. h. The Agency is specifically authorized by Health & Safety Code Sections 33430, 33431 and 33433, and other applicable law, to enter into this Disposition and Development Agreement. i. With respect to the public facilities and improvements to be constructed by or for the Agency and City, said improvements are of benefit to the Project Area and the immediate neighborhood in which the Site is located and no other reasonable means of financing such facilities and improvements are available to the community. j. The City Council has duly considered all terms and conditions of the proposed Agreement and believes that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency and City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements. k. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and to accomplish the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a contract within the meaning of Government Code Section 53511. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds, determines and declares that: a. Section 33334.2, et seq. of the CRL authorizes and directs the Agency to expend a certain percentage of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to me CRL Section 33670 for the purposes of increasing, improving and preserving the community's supply of housing available at affordable housing costs to persons and families of low to moderate income, including lower income and very low income households. b. Pursuant to the CRL, the Agency has established a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (the "Housing Fund"). c. Pursuant to t:s CRL Sect:sn ,3332: .2(e~.. in car,~.dng out !:? affcrcs:-ie nousing activities, the Agency is authorized to provide subsidies to or for the benefit of very low and lower income households, or persons and families of low or moderate income to the extent those households cannot obtain housing at affordable costs on the open market. R:Resos 99- 2 d. Pursuant to the CRL Section 33413(b), the Agency is required to ensure at least fifteen percent (15%) of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed within the Project Area by private of public entities or persons other than the Agency shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income, and such inclusionary units may be provided outside the boundaries of the Project Area in conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(ii). e. Developer proposes, with the assistance of the Agency, to develop the Project and upon completion to make available for the longest feasible period of time all of the housing units in the Project at affordable rents to low income households. f. Pursuant to Sections 33132, 33133, and 33600 of the CRL, the Agency may accept financial or other assistance from any public or private source, for the Agency's activities, powers, and duties, and expend any funds so received for any of the purposes of the CRL. go The expenditures from the Housing Fund as contemplated by the Agreement approved by this Resolution will directly and specifically increase, improve, and preserve the community's supply of low and moderate income housing within the meaning of Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2 and will be of benefit to the Project Area by providing new affordable restricted for occupancy by very low income, lower income and median income households. h. The California Legislature declares in Health and Safety Code Section 36000, et seq., that new forms of cooperation with the private sector, such as leased housing, disposition of real property acquired through redevelopment, development approvals, and other forms of housing assistance may involve close participation with the private sector in meeting housing needs, without amounting to development, construction or acquisition of low rent housing projects as contemplated under Article XXXIV of the State Constitution and that the Agreement approved hereby is not subject to the provisions of said Article XXXIV. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds, determines and declares that: a. This action is being undertaken pursuant to the Plan for which a full and complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the Plan. Additionally an environment review was completed and certified in 1994 for the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Since the preparation and certification of that Envircnmentat impact Report, suDsequent changes have not been proposed in the subject project or in the amendment to the Redeveiopment Plan which will require important revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts which were not considered in the previous EIR. Additionally, substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Redevelopment Plan Amendment has been undertaken which would require important provisions in the previous EIR due to the involvement of significant environmental impacts not covered in the previous EIR. Finally, no new information of substantial importance to the amended area and the Environmental Impact Report R:Resos 99- 3 prepared for that amended area has become available. Moreover, the mitigation measures proposed as part of the Environmental Impact Report for the Amended Rede- velopment Plan have been included, where applicable, in the Project, and such mitigation measures are feasible and further mitigation measures are not required to address concerns raised in the Environmental Impact Report for the Amended Redevelopment Plan. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and, specifically, 14 CaI.Admin. 15162 and 15180, a subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the subject project is not required and the Initial Study of Environmental Impact and the Negative Declaration are sufficient to comply with the provisions of CEQA. b. Notwithstanding the environmental analysis set forth in subsection a. of this section, the Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 15303 as a Class 3 categorical exemption because the Project consists of new construction of a small housing projects of four or fewer units. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Disposition and Development Agreement entitled "Disposition and Development Agreement Between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic, and Inland Valley Habitat for Humanity, a California corporation dated as of April 20, 1999 and authorizes the Agency to approve said Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on ,1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:Resos 99- 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA SS I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on , 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:Resos 99- 5 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY" DATED AS OF APRIL 20, 1999 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1-1988 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and declares that: a. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency duly organized and existing under the Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council of the City of Temecula. b. On June 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside adopted Ordinance No. 658 adopting and approving the "Redevelopment Plan for Riverside County Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988" (hereafter the "Plan") in accordance with the provisions of the CRL. On December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was incorporated. The boundaries of the Project Area described in the Plan are entirely within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. On June 14, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinances Nos. 91-08, 91-11, 91-14, and 91- 15 establishing the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecuta and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan from the County to the City. Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 91-! ~ and 91-15, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula assumed jurisdiction over the Plan as of July 1, 1991. c. The project proposed by Inland Valley Habitat for Humanity ("Developer") pertains to property located at 42220 Sixth Street in the City of Temecula ("Site"), which is within the Project Area. d. The project to be constructed on the Site pursuant to this Agreement will be a two unit housing project with the sale of the units limited by a recorded agreement to persons of low income as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50093. e. Pursuant to the provisions of Health & Safety Code Sections 33430 and 33431, the Agency duly noticed and held a joint public hearing before the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the City Council of the City of Temecula concerning the approval of the proposed Disposition and Development Agreement with Developer. R:Resos. RDA99- 1 f. The Project is a "small housing project" as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 33013. Therefore the report and the findings concerning the market value and reuse value of the Site normally required by Health and Safety Code Section 33433(a) and (b) is not required for this Project as the Agency has adopted a resolution authorizing the sale of the property pursuant to Section 33433(c). g. The Agreement is consistent with the Implementation Plan adopted by the Agency on November 29, 1994. h. The Agency is specifically authorized by Health & Safety Code Sections 33430, 33431 and 33433, and other applicable law, to enter into this Disposition and Development Agreement. i. With respect to the public facilities and improvements to be constructed by or for the Agency and City, said improvements are of benefit to the Project Area and the immediate neighborhood in which the Site is located and no other reasonable means of financing such facilities and improvements are available to the community. j. The Agency Board has duly considered all terms and conditions of the proposed Agreement and believes that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency and City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements. k. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and to accomplish the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a contract within the meaning of Government Code Section 53511. Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby further finds, determines and declares that: a. Section 33334.2, et seq. of the CRL authorizes and directs the Agency to expend a certain Dercentage of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant +o the CRL Section 33670 for the purposes of increasing, improving and preserving tn~ community's supply of housing available at affordable housing costs to persons and families of low to moderate income, including lower income and very low income households. b. Pursuant to the CRL, the Agency has established a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (the "Housing Fund"). c. Pursuant to the CRL Section 33234.2:'e~., in car.'-,: 'ing out its affordaD!e housing activities, the Agency is authorized to provide subsiclies to or for the benefit of very low and lower income households, or persons and families of low or moderate income to the extent those households cannot obtain housing at affordable costs on the open market. R:Resos 99- do Pursuant to the CRL Section 33413(b), the Agency is required to ensure 2 at least fifteen percent (15%) of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed within the Project Area by private of public entities or persons other than the Agency shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income, and such inclusionary units may be provided outside the boundaries of the Project Area in conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(ii). e. Developer proposes, with the assistance of the Agency, to develop the Project and upon completion to make available for the longest feasible period of time all of the housing units in the Project at affordable rants to low income households. f. Pursuant to Sections 33132, 33133, and 33600 of the CRL, the Agency may accept financial or other assistance from any public or private source, for the Agency's activities, powers, and duties, and expend any funds so received for any of the purposes of the CRL. g. The expenditures from the Housing Fund as contemplated by the Agreement approved by this Resolution will diractly and specifically increase, improve, and preserve the community's supply of low and moderate income housing within the meaning of Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2 and will be of benefit to the Project Area by providing new affordable restricted for occupancy by very low income, lower income and median income households. h. The California Legislatura declaras in Health and Safety Code Section 36000, et seq., that new forms of cooperation with the private sector, such as leased housing, disposition of real property acquirad through redevelopment, development approvals, and other forms of housing assistance may involve close participation with the private sector in meeting housing needs, without amounting to development, construction or acquisition of low rent housing projects as contemplated under Article XXXIV of the State Constitution and that the Agreement approved hereby is not subject to the provisions of said Article XXXIV. Section 3. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby further finds, determines and declares that: a. This action is being undertaken pursuant to the Plan for which a full and complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the Plan. Additionally an environment review was completed and certified in 1994 for the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Since the preparation and certification of that Environmental Impact Report, subsequent changes have not been proposed in the subject project or in the amendment to me Redevelopment Plan which will require important rewsions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts which were not considered in the previous EIR. Additionally, substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Redevelopment Plan Amendment has been undertaken which would require important provisions in the previous EIR due to the involvement of significant environmental impacts not covered in the previous EIR. Finally, no new information of substantial importance to the amended area and the Environmental Impact Report prepared for that amended area has become available. Moreover, the mitigation measures proposed as part of the Environmental Impact Report for the Amended Rede- R:Resos 99- 3 velopment Plan have been included, where applicable, in the Project, and such mitigation measures are feasible and further mitigation measures are not required to address concerns raised in the Environmental Impact Report for the Amended Redevelopment Plan. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and, specifically, 14 CaI.Admin. 15162 and 15180, a subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the subject project is not required and the Initial Study of Environmental Impact and the Negative Declaration are sufficient to comply with the provisions of CEQA. b. Notwithstanding the environmental analysis set forth in subsection a. of this section, the Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 15303 as a Class 3 categorical exemption because the Project consists of new construction of a small housing projects of four or fewer units. Section 4. While the Agency determines participation in the feasibility analysis, financing, and development of the Project does not constitute development, construction or acquisition of a low-rent housing project within the meaning of Article XXXIV of the State Constitution, this Resolution is hereby deemed to constitute approval within the meaning of Health and Safety Code Section 36005 of a proposal which may result in housing assistance benefiting persons of low income. Section 5. required pursuant an economically comparable terms The Agency hereby finds and determines that the lien of the covenants to the Agreement may be subordinated to financing for the Project because feasible alternative method of financing the Project on substantially and conditions, but without subordination, is not reasonably available. Section 6. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Disposition and Development Agreement entitled "Disposition and Development Agreement Between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic, and Inland Valley Habitat for Humanity" dated as of April 20, 1999, with such changes mutually agreed upon by the Developer and the Agency Executive Director as are minor and in substantial conformance with the form of such Agreement as have been submitted herewith. The Chairperson of the Agency and the Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized to execute and attest, respectively, the Agreement, including related exhibits and attachments, on behalf of the Agency. In such regard the Executive Director is authorized to cause the Chairperson and Secretary to execute the final version of the Agreement after completion of any such non-substantive, minor revisions to said Agreement has been completed. A copy of the final Agreement when by the Agency Chairperson and attested by the Agency Secretary shall be place on file in the Office of the Secretary of the Agency. Section 7. The Executive Direct:~ of the Agency (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency, to take all actions necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the Agreement and to administer the Agency's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under the Agreement and related documents, including but not limited to, escrow instructions, Regulatory Agreement, certificates of acceptance, and implementing agreements. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on ,1999. R:Resos 99- 4 ATTEST: Karel Fo Lindemans Chairperson Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, Susan Jones, CMC, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on ,1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:Resos 99- 5 DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ~dVD INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC. THIS DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA. a public body, corporate and politic (the "Agency") and INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC., a California Non-Profit Corporation (the "Habitat") and is dated and effective as of April 20, 1999. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agency and the Habitat hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I. SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT Section 1.1 Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, which each of the parties acknowledge to be true and correct: A. The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter "Plan") for Redevelopment Project No. 1--1988 (hereafter "Project Area") by providing for the development of certain property, hereafter described, for very low income housing in accordance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.) and the Plan. B. The real property to be developed pursuant to this Agreement (the "Site") is located at 42220 6th Street, Temecula, California, and is specifically described and depicted on Exhibit No. 1. C. The project to be developed on the Site pursuant to this Agreement consists of the construction of two (2) homes on the Site affordable to persons of very low income as is more particularly defined in the Section 4.1 of this Agreement ("Project"). D. This Agreement is entered into for the purpose of developing the Site for very low income housing purposes and not for speculation in land holding. E. Completing the development on the Site pursuant to this Agreement is in the vital and best interest of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") and the health, safety. and. welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable state and local laws. F. Completing the development of this Site pursuant to this Agreement will assist the Agency with increasing and improving the supply of very low income housing in the community. Development of the Site pursuant to this Agreement will assist in accomplishing 417199 1480879.1 the statutory and Agency goal of increasing the supply of low and moderate income housing within the community. G. The Agency acknowledges that Habitat's purpose in entering into this Agreement is to further its mission to provide simple, decent ownership housing at a cost that is affordable to very low income households. Habitat's program is to build homes. providing home ownership to families of very low income on a no-profit, no-interest basis. It is understood that Habitat is able to serve families of very low income through its unique combination of program components, based on the operational experience of Habitat International and other Habitat Affiliates, including the following: Habitat maintains a low-o- verhead operation, using dedicated volunteers wherever possible, in lieu of paid staff; design and construction are accomplished by volunteers who provide labor, including professional skills and services: donated or reduced-price building materials; and financial donations and no-interest loans from the private sector. The families selected for home ownership become "partners" in the project, providing their own labors in the construction of the homes and assisting in other project-related activities. Before construction begins, the families are carefully selected, on an equal-opportunity basis, for their willingness to fully participate in the project and their potential to become stable, long-term homeowners (plus other criteria). The families are an important part of Habitat's program -- through personal contact with the selected families, volunteers and donors gain a better understanding of habitat's purpose and an increased dedication to the project. Habitat's management program is primarily one of training, which enables the homeowners to maintain and manage their own property, with periodic monitoring and participation, as needed, by Habitat. Because all design and construction costs are Habitat's responsibility, fund-raising, publicity and community outreach activities are normal components of the project, and the timing of project phasing is generally tied to completion of fund-raising goals. Habitat becomes the mortgage loan holder, providing fixed-term, no-interest loans to the Purchasers, and all loan payments are dedicated to the construction of homes for other families of very low income. H. This Agreement is entered into with the express understanding that Habitat is a nonprofit corporation organized and ex~snng under the laws of the State of Califonua and is 501(c)(3) corporation under the Internal Revenue Code. I. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of the Agency to finance its statutory obligations and for all parties to finance and carry out the purposes of this Agreement and the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a Contract within the meaning of Government Code Section 53511. Section 1.2 The Redevelopment Plan On June 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside adopted Ordinance No. 658 adopting and approving the "Redevelopment Plan for Riverside County Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988" (hereafter the "Plan") in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. On December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was incorporated. The boundaries of the Project Area described in the Plan are entirely within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. On April 9. 1991, the City Council of the City of 417/99 1480879.1 - 2 - Temecula adopted Ordinance Nos. 91-08, 91-11, 91-14, and 91-15 establishing the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan from the County to the City. Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 91-11 and 91-15, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula assumed jurisdiction over the Plan as of July 1, 1991. Section 1.3 The Site The Site is located at 42220 6th Street, Temecula, California and is more specifically depicted and described on Exhibit 1, Site Map and Legal Description. Section 1.4 Parties to the Agreement A. The Agency The Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, exercising governmental functions and powers and organized and existing under the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Section 33000, et seq.,, Health and Safety Code; hereafter "Act"). The principal office of the Agency is 43200 Business Park Drive, Post Office Box 9033, Temecula, California 92589-9033. B. Habitat Habitat represents and warrants that it is a California non-profit corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California and that it is also a tax exempt corporation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Habitat has been formed and continues to exist for the primary purpose of developing very low income housing. The principal office and mailing address of the Habitat is: Inland Valley Habitat for Humanity, Inc., Post Office Box 0765, Murietta, California 92564-0765. Section 1.5 Prohibition Against Change in Ownership. Management and Control of Habitat A. The qualifications and identity of Habitat is of particular concern to the Agency. It is because of its qualifications and identity that the Agency has entered into this Agreement with the Habitat. Therefore, no voluntary or involuntary successor in interest of the Habitat shall acquire any rights or powers under this Agreement except as expressly set forth herein. B. The Habitat shall not assign all or any of its rights or duties under this Agreement nor convey the Site, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, without the prior written approval of the Agency, which consent the Agency shall not unreasonably withhold provided the Agency determines that the successor is similarly qualified in terms of its development experience and financial capabilities and has specifically agreed in writing to be bound by the provisions of this Agreement. 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 3 - C. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon .and shall inure to the benefit of the Habitat and the permitted successors and assigns of the Habitat. Whenever the term "Habitat" is used herein, such term shall include any other lawful successors in interest of Habitat. Section 1.6 Contract Documents The Contract Documents which are part of this Agreement, and each of which are incorporated herein by this reference, are as follows: Exhibit No. 1 Site Map and Legal Description of the Site Exhibit No. 2 Schedule of Performance Exhibit No. 3 Regulatory Agreement to be Recorded on Behalf of Habitat Section 1.7 Evidence of Ability to Complete Project Within the time provided in the Schedule of Performance, Exhibit 2., Habitat shall submit to Agency written evidence that Habitat has sufficient funds and/or financing and volunteer labor to complete the Project. ARTICLE II. CONVEYANCE OF SITE TO HABITAT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS Section 2.1 Al, ency Ownership of Site Agency is the owner in fee simple of the Site. Section 2.2 Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined), Agency agrees to sell the Site to Habitat, and Habitat agrees to buy the Site from Agency, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Section 2.3 Purchase Price. The total purchase price for the Site to be paid by Habitat is the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) (the "Purchase Price"), which sum shall be paid in full in cash on the Close of Escrow. Section 2.4 Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opemng of Escrow, Escrow Holder shall order from First American Title Company ("Title Company") a title commitment for the Site. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments identified as exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver these instruments and the title commitment to Habitat and Agency. Habitat's fee title to the Site shall be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance in the mount of eighty thousand dollars ($80,000.00), which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to the be value 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 4 - of the Site without the restrictions of this Agreement (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided for pursuant to this Section shall insure Habitat's fee interest in the Site free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, restrictions. and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following permitted conditions of title ("Permitted Title Exceptions"): A. The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Site: and B. Those non-monetary exceptions approved by Habitat within fifteen (15) business days after the date Habitat receives the title commitment and legible copies of all instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Habitat unconditionally disapproves any such exceptions. Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited therein shall be refunded to Habitat (less Habitat's share of escrow cancellation charges), and this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. If Habitat conditionally disapproves any such exceptions, then Agency shall use Agency's best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Habitat may, at Habitat's option, either accept the Site subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less Habitat's share of one-half of escrow cancellation charges), if any, and this Agreement shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close of Escrow, Habitat's fee title to the Site shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances. Section 2.5 Grant Deed. Agency covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Agency. granting and conveying to Habitat the Site. The Grant Deed shall be in a form satisfactory, to Habitat and Habitat's counsel and shall be accepted by Habitat prior to recording. Section 2.6 Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. Escrow Holder is hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and documents called for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow. provided each of the following conditions has then been fulfilled: A. Title Company can issue in favor of Habitat the Policy, showing the Site vested in Habitat subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions. B. Escrow Holder shall have received Agency's notice of approval or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Habitat's obligations hereunder. as provided for in Scc:ic:,~ 2. C. Agency shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed for the Site. D. Habitat shall provide Agency with evidence that Habitat has sufficient funds and/or financing and volunteer labor to complete the Project pursuant to Section 1.7 of the Agreement 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 5 - E. Habitat shall have deposited in Escrow the duly approved and executed Regulatory Agreement in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit 3., Regulatory Agreement. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed. Section 2.7 Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to accommodate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of this Agreement from Habitat and Agency. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant Deed to Habitat is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The Close of Escrow shall be on the date which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage to the Site from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Agency. Agency shall pay all escrow costs. Section 2.8 Escrow Chart, es and Prorations. Agency shall pay for the cost of the CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Agency shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fail to close through no fault of either party, Agency and Habitat shall each pay one-half of all Escrow cancellation charges. Section 2.9 License to Enter. Agency hereby grants to Habitat and Habitat's authorized agents. contractors, consultants, assigns, attorneys, accountants and other representatives an irrevocable license to enter upon the Site for the purpose of making inspections and other examinations of the Site, including. but not limited to. the right to perform soii and geological tests of the Site and an environmental site assessment thereof. Habitat shall give Agency reasonable notice before going on the Site. Habitat does hereby indemnify and forever save Agency. Agency's heirs. successors and assigns, and the Site, free and harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses. demands, causes of action, claims or judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Site as a result of any accident or other occurrence at the Site which is in any way connected with Habitat's inspections or non-permanent imgrovements involvin~ entrance onto the Site pursuant to this Section. If Habitat fails a::duir$ :i:~ 5it~ due :o Habitat's de:auA. :n,,s license snail terrrtinate upon tn~ termInation of Habitat's right to purchase the Site. In such event, Habitat shall remove or cause to be removed all Habitat's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from the Site. Section 2.10 Warranties and Representations of Agency. Agency hereby represents and warrants to Habitat the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive the Close of Escrow: 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 6 - A. That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Site shall be free and clear of any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not limited to, asbestos; (ii) the Site is in compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, including environmental, health and safety requirements; and (iii) Agency has no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the Site or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To this end. it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Site to Habitat, Agency shall indemnify. protect. defend and hold harmless Habitat from and against any and all claims. liabilities. suits. losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and costs. arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Site, injuries to or death of persons, or for the cost of cleaning up the Site and removing hazardous or toxic substances, materials and waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the environment, or by reason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Site, caused by or resulting from any hazardous material. substance or waste existing on, under or about the Site on the Close of Escrow. B. That Agency is the sole owner of the Site free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroaclunents by improvements or vegetation on the Site onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature, other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Agency shall not further encumber the Site or allow the Site or to be further encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow. C. Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder including the transfer of the Site to Habitat. violates or shall violate any contract,' agreement or instrument to which Agency is a party, or which affects the Site, and the sale of the Site herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto. D. There are no mechanics', materialmen's or similar claims or liens presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Site for work performed or commenced prior to the date of this Agreement. Agency agrees to hold Habitat harmless from all costs, expenses, liabilities, losses. charges, fees. including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or any similar lien claimed against the Site and arising from work performed or commenced prior to the Close of Escrow. E. There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or option to lease. purchase. or otherwise enjoy possession. ri_~hts or interest of anv nature in and to the Site or any part :h~reof. and no persons have any right of possession to the Site or any part thereof. F. Agency has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential litigation, action or proceeding against Agency or any other Party before any court or administrative tribunal which is in any way related to the Site. Section 2.11 Agency Conditions Precedent to the Sale of Site to Habitat 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 7 - Habitat hereby represents and warrants to Agency the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive the Close of Escrow: A. Habitat continues to be a non-profit corporation in good standing with the State of California and a 501(c)(3) corporation under the Internal Revenue Code; B. Habitat has submitted evidence of Habitat's funds or has binding commitments for funds sufficient to pay all costs of development which Habitat will be required to pay to complete the development of the Site. C. Habitat has submitted and the City has approved final construction plans satisfactory for obtaining all necessary building permits exclusive of payment of permit fees: and D. Habitat has obtained all permits from all governmental entities necessary for commencement of construction except for City issuance of the building permit. Section 2.12 Certification of Non-Foreien Status. Agency covenants to deliver to Escrow a certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice pursuant to California' Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 2613 1, prior to the Close of Escrow. Section 2.13 Further Instructions. Each party agrees to execute such other and further escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. A. Executive Director's Authority. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation. escrow instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, the Regulato~ Agreement. agreements for payments of lost rent. or certifications. as may be necessa~ or convenient to implement the terms of this Agreement. B. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be concerned with Sections 2.8 and 2.10 hereof, and Habitat and Agency release Escrow Holder from liability or obligation as to Sections 2.8 and 2.10 hereof. ARTICLE III. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE Section 3.1 Scope of Development The Site shall be developed with two (2) single family homes with minimum home size of one thousand (1000) square feet within the general controls established in the Temecula Municipal Code, and related laws governing municipal planning, zoning and 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 8 - subdivision. The architectural style of the homes shall be consistent with the architectural styles required by the Old Town Specific Plan, Temecula, California. Section 3.2 Cost of Construction The cost of developing the Site and constructing all improvements on the Site shall be borne by the Habitat, except for work expressly set forth in the Agreement to be performed by the Agency or others. Section 3.3 Construction Schedule After the conveyance of title to the Site, the Habitat shall promptly begin and thereafter diligently prosecute to completion the construction of the improvements and the development upon the Site in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, Exhibit 3. The Habitat shall begin and complete all construction and development within the times specified in the Schedule of Performance or such reasonable extension of said dates as may be granted by the Agency. The Schedule of Performance is subject to revision from time-to-time as mutually agreed upon in writing between the Habitat and the Agency. Section 3.4 Indemnity and Insurance A. The Habitat shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold the Agency and the City, and their respective elected and appointed officers and employees, hamless from all costs (including attorneys fees and costs), claims, demands or liabilities judgments for injury or damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, which may be caused by any of the Habitat's activities under this Agreement, whether such Activities or performance thereof be by the Habitat or anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by the Habitat and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement. This indemnity includes, but is not limited to, anv repair. cleanup, remedialion. detoxification. or preparation and implementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action) concerning any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq.], the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ["RCRA "; 42 U. S. C. Section 6901 et seq.] and California Health and Safety Code Section Code Section 25280 et seq. at any place where Habitat owns or has control of real property pursuant to any of Habitat's activities under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA and California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to assure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify Agency from liability. B. Not in derogation of the indemnity provisions of subsection A of this Section, the Habitat shall take out and maintain during the period set forth in Subsection E, a comprehensive liability policy in the amount of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 9 - any person, Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for any occurrence, and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) property damage naming the City and Agency as additional insureds. C. Habitat shall also provide and maintain insurance against loss or damage to the project and all properr/of an insurable nature located upon the Site, resulting from fire, lightning, vandalism, malicious mischief, riot and civil commotion, and such other perils ordinarily included in extended coverage fire insurance policies. Such insurance shall be maintained in an amount not less than one hundred percent (100°7o) of the full insurable value of the Project. as defined below. The term "full insurable value" as used in this Section shall mean the actual replacement cost (excluding the cost of land, excavation, foundation and footings below the lowest floor and without deduction for depreciation) of the Improvements immediately before such Casualty or other loss, including the cost of construction of the Improvements, architecture and engineering fees, and inspection and supervision. D. The Habitat shall famish a certificate of insurance signed by an authorized agent of the insurance carrier setting forth the general provisions of the insurance coverage. Except for property damage insurance, the certificate of insurance shall name the City and the Agency and their respective officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds under the policy. The certificate of insurance shall contain a statement of obligation on the part of the carrier to notify the Agency by certified mail of any modification, cancellation or termination of the coverage at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of any such modification, cancellation or termination. Coverage provided hereunder by the Habitat shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any insurance maintained by the Agency or City, and the policy shall contain such an endorsement. The required certificate shall filed with the Agency prior to commencement of construction. E. The Habitat shall also furnish or cause to be famished to the Agency evidence satisfactory to the Agency that Habitat and any contractor with whom it has contracted for the performance of work on the Site or otherwise pursuant to this Agreement carries workers' compensation insurance as required by law and that such workers' compensation insurance covers Habitat's volunteers. F. The insurance obligations set forth in this Section shall remain in effect only until a final Certificate of Completion has been famished for all of the improvements as hereafter provided in this Agreement. Section 3.5 Citv and Other Governmental A.,2encv Permits A. Before commencement of construction or development of any buildings, structures or other work of improvement the Habitat shall, at its own expense, secure or cause to be secured any and all permits which may be required by the City and any other Governmental agency having jurisdiction as to such construction, development or work. Agency shall pay on behalf of Habitat all City permit fees. 4/7199 1480879.1 - 10- B. The Habitat assumes all responsibility for taking all actions necessary to comply with the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code § 66410, et seq..) and local Subdivision enactments related thereto in order to comply with the scope of development. Section 3.6 Local. State and Federal laws The Habitat shall carry out the provisions of this Agreement in conformity with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations. Section 3.7 Antidiscrimination During, Construction The Habitat, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that in the construction of the improvements provided for in this Agreement, the Habitat shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, marital status, handicap, national origin or ancestry. Section 3.8 Taxes, Assessments. Encumbrances and Liens The Habitat shall pay when due all real estate taxes and assessments on the Site and levied subsequent to a conveyance of title to the Site. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Completion pursuant to this Agreement, the Habitat shall not place or allow to be placed on the Site or any part thereof any mortgage, trust deed, encumbrance or lien other than as expressly allowed by this Agreement. The Habitat shall remove or have removed any levy or attachment made on any of the Site or any part thereof, or assure the satisfaction thereof within a reasonable time but in any event prior to a sale thereunder. Section 3.9 Prohibition Ae, ainst Transfer of the Site. the Buildin~,s or Structures and Assignment of Agreement Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion pursuant to this Agreement as to 2nv building or structure, the Habitat shall not. except as permitted by this Agreement, without prior approval of the Agency, make any total or partial sale, transfer, conveyance, assignment or lease of the whole or any part of the Site or of the buildings or structures on the Site except as permitted by this Agreement. This prohibition shall not be deemed to prevent the granting of temporary or permanent easements or permits to facilitate the development of the Site. Section 3.10 No Encumbrances Except Deeds of Trust for Development Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, deeds of trust are permitted before completion of the construction of the improvements, but only for the purpose of securing loans of funds to be used for financing the acquisition of the Site, the construction of improvements on the Site, and any other purposes in connection with development under this Agreement. The Habitat shall notify the Agency in advance of any mortgage, deed of trust or sale and leaseback financing, if the Habitat proposes to enter into the same before 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 1 I - completion of the construction of the improvements on the Site. Agency approval shall be required for any other financing. Section 3.11 Certificate of Completion. Upon the Agency's determination that the Project has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Agency shall approve and record a Certificate of Completion, in substantially the form attached herald as Exhibit 4., Certificate of Completion. Agency shall issue said Certificate of Completion within thirty (30) days of being requested to do so by Habitat. ARTICLE IV. USE OF THE SITE Section 4.1 Uses Habitat covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, its assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site or any part thereof, that during construction and Hereafter, the Habitat, and such successors and such assignees, shall devote,the Site to use as two (2) units of very low income housing, as defined in Section 4.2 of this Agreement. Section 4.2 Oualifications of Purchasers of Units of the Project A. The units of the Project shall be maintained as Very low Income Housing and each unit shall be conveyed to persons of Very Low Income as such terms are defined in this Section in accordance with a Regulatory Agreement which shall be recorded concurrently with the Grant Deed in substantially the form of Exhibit 3. B. For purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Persons or families of very low income" means persons whose income do not exceed the amounts set forth in California Health and Safety Code Sections 50105 (very low income) for persons and families who have incomes not greater than the applicable percentage of the area median income (adjusted for family size as appropriate for the Unit) for the very low income category. 2. "Area median income" shall mean the area median incame for Riverside Count)' as puViisn~cl b) :he D~?~nn-.~:-,~ ~,:' H~.~sing aric Coz~m~umty Development pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50093, or the most closely related successor thereto. 3. "Adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit" shall mean for a household of one person in the case of a studio unit, two persons in the case of a one- bedroom unit, three persons in the case of a two-bedroom unit, four persons in the case of a three-bedroom unit, and five persons in the case of a four-bedroom unit; 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 12 - Section 4.3 Priority in the Selection of Purchasers to Temecula Residents Habitat shall provide priority in the selection of purchasers who have lived in the City of Temecula for a continuous period of one (1) year prior to submitting an application for ownership ("Temecula Residents"). Habitat shall cooperate with the Agency prior to the initial sale of any units to effectuate this provision. To implement this provision, Habitat agrees to provide notice to the Agency, in writing, prior to beginning to market units. Section 4.4 Covenants for Non-Discrimination A. The Habitat covenants by and for itself and any successors in interest that no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of color, creed. religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Habitat itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Site. B. The Habitat shall refrain from restricting the rental, sale or lease of the Site on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, national origin or ancestry of any person. All such deeds, leases or contracts shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: 1. In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex. marital status, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself or herself or any person claiming under or through him or her establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with referenc:. to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants. sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. 2. In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself or herself,. his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him or her. and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conciitions: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, ancestry or national origin in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee himself or herself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or 4/7/99 1480879.1 13 - segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants or vendees in the premises herein leased. 3. In contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person, or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, ancestry or national origin, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the premises, nor shall the transferee himself or herself or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the premises. C. The covenants established in this Section and the deeds shall, without regard to technical classification and designation, be binding for the benefit and in favor of the Agency, its successors and assigns, the City and any successor in interest to the Site or any pan thereof. The covenants, contained in this Section and the Gram Deed shall remain in perpetuity. Section 4.5 Maintenance Covenants Subsequent to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, the Habitat, and all successors and assigns in interest to the Site, shall be obligated to maintain the Site, and all improvements and landscaping situated thereon, in a clean and neat condition and in a continuous state of good repair. In the event the Habitat, or a duly approved successor of Habitat, fails to maintain the Site as required by this Agreement, Agency shall notify Habitat in writing of such failure and specify the work necessary to meet the maintenance obligation. In the event the work specified is not completed within thirty (30) days of the date of said notice, Agency may, but shall not be obligated to, enter the Site, complete the work, and bill Habitat for the cost of said work. ARTICLE V. GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 5.1 Notices, Demands and Communications Among the Parties V~:rit~n notices, aemands and communications among the Agency and the Habi.:at. shall be sufficiently given by personal service or dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the Agency or the Habitat described in this Section. Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this Section. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, notice personally served shall be deemed to have been received as of the date of personal service and notice sent by mail shall be deemed serve three (3) business 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 14- days following deposit in the mail. For the purposes of this Section, the addresses to which notices shall be sent are: Agency: Redevclopmcnt Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Executive Director Habitat: Inland Valley Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Post Office Box 0765 Muriena, California 92564-0765 Attention: President Section 5.2 Conflicts of Interest The Habitat warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any officer, employee or agent of the City or Agency any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. Section 5.3 Enforced Delav: Extension of Times of Performance A. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended. where party seeking the extension has acted diligently and delays or defaults are due to events beyond the reasonably control of the party such as but not limited to: war; insurrection: strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires: casualties: acts of God: acts of the public enemy; epidemics: quarantine restrictions: freight embargoes; intergalactic invasion, lack of transportation; litigation; unusually severe weather; or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. B. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the parry. claiming such ex:ension is sent to the other party within tnir'ty {30) days of the commencement of the cause. C. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of the Executive Director of the Agency and Habitat. 4/7/99 1480879.1 15- Section 5.4 Non-liability of Officials and Employees of the At, ency No member, official or employee of the Agency or the City shall be personally liable to the Habitat, or any successor in interest, pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, not by any default or breach by the Agency (or the City). Section 5.5 Inspection of Books and Records Each party has the right to inspect, at reasonable times, the books and records of the other pertaining to the Site as pertinent to the purposes of this Agreement. ARTICLE VI. DEFAULTS AND REEMBODIES Section 6.1 Defaults - General A. Subject to the extensions of time set forth in Section 5.3, failure or delay by (either party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. A party claiming a default (claimant) shall give written notice of default to the other party, specifying the default complained of. B. The claimant shall not terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.7, institute proceedings against the other party nor be entitled to damages if the other party within fourteen (14) days from receipt of such notice immediately, with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such notice or if such cure, correction or remedy by its nature cannot be effected within such thirty (30) day period. such cure, correction or remedy is diligently and continuously prosecuted until completion thereof. Such cure. correction and remedy shall include payment of any costs. expenses ~including attorney fees) or cureages incurreel by the non-ciefaulting party re. suiting from the default or during the period of default. Section 6.2 Legal Actions A. Institution of Legal Actions Anv legal actions related to or arisin~ out of this A~reement rnu~,t be instituted in the ::ups:r:.,:,: C'd, un cr ~..~ Ccunt~ of Ld's .-~.r.:~ze~. S:.~:= of Caiifornia. in a:% ,~ppropr::i:_~ Municipal court in that county, or, if federal jurisdiction exists, in the Federal District Court in the Central District of California. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. B. Applicable Law 4/7/99 ~4s0879. t 16 - The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. C. Acceptance of Service of Process 1. In the event that any legal action is commenced by the Habitat against the Agency, service of process on the Agency shall be made by personal service upon the Executive Director or in such other manner as may be provided by law. 2. In the event that any legal action is commenced by the Agency against the Habitat, service of process on the Habitat shall be made by personal service upon a corporate officer of the Habitat and shall be valid whether made within or without the State of California or in such other manner as may be provided by law. Section 6.3 Rig, hts and Remedies Are Cumulative Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. Section 6.4 Inaction Not a Waiver of Default Any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive either such party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem. necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. Section 6.5 Damages If a default is not fullv cured bv the defaulting party as provided in Section 6.1. the Defaulting party shall be liable to the other party for any damages caused by such default, and the nondefaulting party may thereafter (but not before) commence an action for damages against the defaulting party with respect to such default. Section 6.6 Specific Performance If a default under this Agreement is not full3' cured bv the defaulting party as ~7,,_'.'~'iC:2 in Section 6. j.. the nondefaulting party at its option may thereafter (but not before) commence an action for specific performance of terms of this Agreement. Section 6.7 Remedies and Rights Prior to the Agency Convevance A. Termination bv the Habitat 4/7/99 1480879.1 ' 17- Prior to the conveyance of the Site to Habitat, the Habitat may terminate this Agreement and its obligations thereunder (subject to Paragraph D below) for any of the following reasons: 1. the Agency does not convey title and possession of Site in the manner and condition and by the date provided in this Agreement; 2. the Agency defaults in the performance of any material obligation hereunder and such failure is not cured within the time required by this Agreement: or Agency does not agree to remove title exceptions as provided in Section 2.4: 4. Habitat disapproves the results of the environmental investigation as provided in Section 2.9; or 5. Habitat is unable to raise sufficient funds by donation or financing to construct the Project. B. Termination by the Aaency Prior to the conveyance of the Site to Habitat, the Agency may terminate this Agreement and its obligations thereunder (subject to Paragraph D below) for any of the following reasons: I. prior to the convevance of the Site the Habitat (or any successor in interest) assigns or attempts to assign the Agreement or any rights therein or in the Site in violation of this Agreement; or 2. Agency disapproves the results of the environmental investigation as provided in Section 2.9; 3. the Habitat does not submit certificates of insurance and related dc~,;un'~en~s as requ:re~: h,y ti':i~ .;~gre:m~nt. in ii~. mareher and s2,' ti-:c. ~a~.es respectively provided in this Agreement therefor; or 4. the Habitat does not take title to Site under tender of conveyance by the Agency pursuant to this Agreement. 5. Agency determines, in its sole discretion, that Habitat does not have sufficient funds or financing to construct the Project. 4/7/99 1480879.1 ~ 18- C. Procedure for Termination In order to terminate this Agreement prior to conveyance of the Site to Habitat for any reason set forth in Paragraph A or B above, the party proposing to terminate shall deliver written notice of its intent to do at least fifteen (15) days prior to the proposed date of termination and stating the reasons for termination. The party proposing to terminate the Agreement may withdraw the proposed termination or extend the effective date at any time prior to the effective date of the termination. D. Consequences of Termination In the event of termination of this Agreement in accordance with this Section, neither party shall have any rights or recourse against the other, except in the case of termination pursuant to Paragraph A. 1., A.2., B. 1, B.3, or B24, in which event the terminating party shall be entitled to any damages or other relief in law or equity to which it may be entitled. ARTICLE VII. POWER OF TERMINATION AND RIGHT OF AGENCY TO REENTER SITE Section 7.1 Power of Termination and Rieht to Reenter and Revest Title in the A[encv After A~,encv Conveyance A. The Agency has the additional right of termination, at its option, to reenter and take possession of the Site. with all improvements thereon. and terminate and revest in the Agency the estate conveyed to the Habitat if prior to the issuance of the Certificate Of Completion. the Habitat shall: 1. Fail to start the construction of the improvements as required by this Agreement within the times set forth in Exhibit 2, Schedule of Performance; 2. Abandon or substantially suspend construction of the improvements required by this Agreement for a period of sixty (60) days; or 3. Transfer or suffer any involuntary transfer of the Site or any part thereof in violation of this Agreement; or 4. Commit any other material default pursuant to this Agreement. 4/7/99 1480879.1 19 - B. Such power of termination and right to reenter, terminate and revest shall not be exercised with respect to the Site when a Certificate of Completion has issued for all improvements to be constructed on the Site pursuant to this Agreement. C. Such power of termination and right to reenter, terminate and revest shall further be subject to and be limited by and shall not defeat, render invalid or limit: 1. Any mortgage or deed of trust permitted by this Agreement; or 2. Any rights or interests provided in this Agreement for the protection of the holders of such mortgages or deed of trust. D. The Grant Deed shall contain appropriate reference and provision to give effect to the Agency's power of termination and right of reentry as set forth in this Section, under specified circumstances prior to recordation of the Certificate of Completion, to reenter and take possession of the Site, with all improvements thereon, and to terminate and revest in the Agency the estate conveyed to the Habitat. E. Upon the revesting in the Agency of title to the Site as provided in this Section, the Agency shall, pursuant to its responsibilities under state law, use its best efforts to resell the Site as soon and in such manner as the Agency shall find feasible and consistent with the objectives of such law and of the Redevelopment Plan, as it may be amended, to a qualified and responsible party or parties (as determined by the Agency) who will assume the obligation or making or completing the improvements, or such other improvements in their stead as shall be satisfactory to the Agency and in accordance with the uses specified for such Site or part thereof in the Redevelopment Plan. Upon such resale of the Site, the proceeds thereof, if any, shall be applied: I. First, to the value of the Site as of the date of conveyance to Habitat shall be paid to the Agency; 2. Second. the Agency's expenses in maintaining the property upon revesting and the Agency's costs and expenses in recapturing and reselling the Site shall be paid to the Agency; and 3. Third, any mortgage or deed of trust permitted by this Agreement shall be paid in order of priority. ARTICLE VIII. SPECIAL PROVISIONS Section 8.1 Real Estate Commission 4,'7/99 1480879.1 - 20 - Neither party to this Agreement has had any contact or dealing regarding the sale of the Site to Habitat through any licensed real estate broker or any other person who may claim a right to commission or ~nder's fee as a procuring cause of the sale.of the Site. In the event that any broker or a finder presents a claim for a commission or a ~nder's fee which is based either on this Agreement or upon the broker's or ~nder's dealings or communications with any party, then the party through whom the broker or finder bases his claim shall indemnify, save harmless and defend the other party from said claim. including but not limited to all costs and expenses incurred by the other party in defending said claim. Section 8.2 Entire Agreement, Waivers & General A. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. B. Amendments hereto must be in writing executed by the appropriate authorities of the Agency and the Habitat. C. The parties agree that each party has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. D. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and "party" include corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or association where ever the context so requires. E. The recitals and captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain. modify. amplify or aid in the interpretation. construction or meaning of the pro- visions of this Agreement. Section 8.3 Time of Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence in this Agreement. notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company's general Escrow instructions. 4/7199 1480879.1 - 2 1 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Agency and the Habitat have signed this agreement as of the date first written above. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Karel Lindemans Chairperson ATTEST: Susan Jones Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson Counsel to the Agency INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, a California Non-Profit Corporation By: Name: Title: Name: Title: 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 22 - State of California County of Riverside ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ) On ,1999, before me, , personally appeared [1 [] personally known to me -OR- proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY State of Califorma County of Riverside ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ) , 1999, before me, , personally appeared [] [] personally known to me -OR- proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies). and that by his/her/their stgnature~s~ on the instrument the persores), or the entity upon oehalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 23 - EXHIBIT NO. 1 SITE MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTHEASTERLY 120 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 240 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 70 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF THAT TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY USED AS A RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND STATION GROUNDS OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, CONVEYED TO N. R. VAIL, ET AL, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 11, 1940 IN BOOK 464 PAGE 505 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID PROPERTY BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 27, AS SHOWN BY MAP OF TEMECULA ON FILE IN BOOK 15 PAGE 726 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 36, AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 37, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 25, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AGENCY: By Habitat: By -24- EXHIBIT NO. 2 SCHEDUI, E OF PERFORMANCE 1. Evidence of Ability to Complete Project. Habitat shall provide Agency with evidence that Habitat has sufficient funds and/or financing and volunteer labor to complete the Project pursuant to Section 1.7 of the Agreement: On or before the Close of Escrow. 2. Opening of Escrow. Agency and Participant shall open escrow for the purchase of the Acquisition Parcel by Participant: Within 5 calendar days of approval of this Agreement by Agency. 3. Preliminary Title Report Approval. Habitat shall approve those non-monetary exceptions to title to the Site: Within fifteen (15) business days after the date Habitat receives the title commitment and legible copies of all instruments noted as exceptions there- in. 4. Evidence of Insurance. Habitat shall furnish to the Agency a certificate of insurance as set forth in Section 3.7 of the Agreement: Prior to the Habitat or its agents entering the Site, performing any environmental testing or investigation, or commencement of demolition, whichever occurs first. 5. Conveyance of Title. Subject to Section 2.6 of this Agreement, the Agency shall convey title to Participant, and Participant shall accept conveyance, and the escrow pertaining thereto shall close: Within 60 calendar days after execution of this Agreement unless an extension of time is authorized by Agency. 6. Commencement of Construction. Participant shall commence construction of the improvements on the Site: No later than 60 calendar days after conveyance of title. 7. Completion of Construction. on-site and off-site improvements for the Site: commencement of construction Habitat shall complete construction of the No later than six (6) months following 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 25 - EXHIBIT 3. REGULATORY AGREEMENT TO BE RECORDED ON BEHALF OF HABITAT Recording Requested By and when recorded return to: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Clerk/Secretary Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Sec. 6103 REGULATORY AGREEMENT CONTAINING COVENANTS AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY THIS REGULATORY AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), entered into as of , 1999, by and between INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC., a California Non-Profit Corporation (hereinafter "Habitat"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter the "Agency") is made with reference to the following: RECITALS A. On June 12. 1988. the Board of Supep¢isors of the CounD' of Riverside adopted Ordinance No. 658 adopting and approving the "Redevelopment Plan for Riverside County Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988" (hereafter the "Plan") in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. On December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was incorporated. The boundaries of the Project Area described in the Plan are entirely within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. On April 9, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinance Nos. 91-08, 91-11, 91-14, and 91-15 establishing the Redevelopment Agencv of the City of Temecula and transferring jurisdiction over the Pian from ti-,c Count>.' to me City. Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 9i-il and 91-15, the C~ry of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula assumed jurisdiction over the Plan as of July 1, 1991. B. Habitat for Humanity is the fee owner of certain real property (the "Property") described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Pursuant to that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated as of April 20, 1999 (the "DDA"), Agency agreed to convey the Property to the Habitat and the Habitat agreed to 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 26 - construct two homes on the Property for sale to persons of very low income as further set forth in the DDA. C. Completing the development of this Property pursuant to the Disposition and DDA between the parties and this Agreement will assist the Agency with increasing and improving the supply of very low income housing in the community. Development of the Site pursuant to the DDA and this Agreement will assist in accomplishing the statutory and Agency goal of increasing the supply of low and moderate income housing within the community and implementing the Housing Element of the General Plan. D. The Agency acknowledges that Habitat's purpose in entering into this Agreement is to further its mission to provide simple, decent ownership housing at a cost that is affordable to very low income households. Habitat's program is to build homes, providing home ownership to families of very low income on a no-profit, no-interest basis. It is understood that Habitat is able to serve families of very low income through its unique combination of program components, based on the operational experience of Habitat International and other Habitat Affiliates, including the following: Habitat maintains a low'o- verhead operation, using dedicated volunteers wherever possible, in lieu of paid staff; design and construction are accomplished by volunteers who provide labor, including professional skills and services; donated or reduced-price building materials; and financial donations and no-interest loans from the private sector. The families selected for home ownership become "partners" in the project, providing their own labors in the construction of the homes and assisting in other project-related activities. Before construction begins, the families are carefully selected, on an equal-opportunity basis, for their willingness to fully participate in the project and their potential to become stable, long-teE homeowners (plus other criteria). The families are an important part of Habitat's program -- through personal contact with the selected families, volunteers and donors gain a better understanding of habitat's purpose and an increased dedication to the project. Habitat's management program is primarily one of training, which enables the homeowners and the new homeowner's Association to maintain and manage their own property, with periodic monitoring and participation. as needed. by Habitat. Because all design and construction costs are Habitat's responsibility, fund-raising. publicity and community outreach activities are normal components of the project, and the timing of project phasing is generally tied to completion of fund-raising goals. Habitat becomes the mortgage loan holder, providing fixed-term, no-interest loans to the Purchasers, and all loan payments are dedicated to the construction of homes for other families of very low income. E. As an inducement to Agencv to enter into the DDA. Habitat has agreed to enter into :h~s Agreement and ~as consented thereby to be regulated and restricted by as provided herein and in the DDA which, inter alia, contains on-going "use" restrictions which are incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, Agency and Habitat mutually agree as follows: 4,'7/99 1480879.1 - 27 - 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are a pan of this Agreement and are incorporated herein. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement (the "Term") shall commence on the date of recordation of this Agreement, and shall continue in full force and effect until the thirtieth (30th) anniversary of the recordation hereof in the Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder (the "Expiration Date"). 3. Nature of Covenants. Reservations and Restrictions. (a) Habitat hereby subjects the Property to the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth in this Agreement. During construction and thereafter for the Term set forth in Section 2 hereof, Habitat, its successors and assigns, shall devote the Property only to the uses specified in the DDA and this Agreement. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying Owner's interest in the Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to such covenants, reservations and restrictions, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such lease, assignment, contract, deed or other instruments. (b) Habitat covenants and agrees by and for itself, its representatives, its successors and assigns and every successor in interest to the Property or any part thereof, that during construction of the improvements on the Property and thereafter Habitat shall not use or permit the use of the Property in violation of the Redevelopment Plan. Habitat further covenants and agrees to comply in all respects with the terms, provisions, and obligations of Habitat set forth in the DDA. Habitat further covenants and agrees that Habitat shall use the Property and every part thereof only for the construction and operation of a very low income housing project affordable to persons of very low income, as further provided herein. Habitat further covenants and agrees that upon completion of the two very low income homes on the Site as described in the DDA (the "Project"), Habitat shall maintain the Property !including landscaping) in the manner of first class resictential planned developments, as further described herein and in the DDA. 4. Use of the Property. Habitat covenants and agrees by and for itself, its representatives, its successors and assigns and every successor in interest to the Property or any part thereof. that the units comprising the Project (the "Units") and the Property shall be restricted as provided in this Section 4 for the Term set forth in Section 2 hereof. ta.~ Units Rcs:ricted t.z, Persons or Families of Ve,w low Income. The units of the Project shall be maintained as Very Low Income Housing and each unit shall be conveyed to persons of Very Low Income as such terms are defined in this Section and state law. A transfer of the Property to the heirs or devisees of a qualified owner shall not be deemed to be a conveyance under this section and the heir or devisee shall not be required to qualify as a person of Very Low Income; provided, however, that any sale or further conveyance by such heir or devisee shall comply with the requirements of this section. 4/7i99 1480879.1 ' 28 - For purposes of this Agreement, the following (b) Definitions. definitions shall apply: (i) "Persons or families of very low income" means persons whose income do not exceed the amounts set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 50105 (very low income) for persons and families who have incomes not greater than the applicable percentage of the area median income (adjusted for family size as appropriate for the Unit) for the very low income category. (ii) "Area median income" shall mean the area median income for Riverside County as published by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50093, or the most closely related successor thereto. (iii) "Adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit" shall mean for a household of one person in the case of a studio unit, two persons in the case of a one-bedroom unit, three persons in the case of a two-bedroom unit, four persons in the case of a three-bedroom unit, and five persons in the case of a four- bedroom unit; (c) Priority to Very low Income Temecula Residents. Habitat shall provide priority in the selection of purchasers who have lived in the City of Temecula for a continuous period of one (1) year prior to submitting an application for ownership C'Temecula Residents"). Habitat shall cooperate with the Agency prior to the initial sale of any units to effectuate this provision. To implement this provision, Habitat agrees to provide notice to the Agency, in writing, prior to beginning to market units. Habitat must accept any Temecula Residents who meets Habitat's selection criteria. 5. Rights of Agencv. Prior to the sale of any Unit, Habitat shall obtain from the proposed buyer a completed income computation and certification form, in such form as may be approved by the Executive Director of the Agency. and shall verify the income of the proposed buyer. Habitat shall verify the proposed buyer's income by standard and customary income verification procedures and practices used for determining eligibility for income qualifying housing. Agency shall have the continuing right during the Term hereof to verify that the restrictions, limitations and requirements of this Section are being complied with and to establish and/or continue a very low income (as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50093) housing program at the Property. 6. Covenants and Obligations. (a) Compliance with Buildin~ and Health and Safety Codes. Habitat covenants that the Property shall be maintained in substantial conformante with applicable health. building, and safety codes and regulations. Habitat further covenants that any construction, renovation, repair or rehabilitation of the improvements shall be undertaken in compliance with all building codes of the City of Temecula applicable at the time of such construction. renovation, repair or rehabilitation. 4/7/99 1480879.1 ° 29 - (b) Obligation to Refrain from Discrimination. Habitat covenants that there shall be no discrimination against any person, or group of persons, on account of sex, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property, or any part thereof, and Habitat (or any person or entity claiming under or through Owner) covenants and agrees not to establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants or sublessees of the Property or any part thereof. Habitat also agrees to refrain from any form of discrimination as set forth above pertaining to deeds, leases or contracts. (c) Form of Nondiscrimination and Non-segrea:ation Clauses. Habitat covenants that Owner. its successors and assigns, shall refrain from restricting the rental. sale or lease of the Property, or any portion thereof, in any deed,' lease or contract of sale. on the basis of sex, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, ancestry or national origin of any person. Any such deed, lease or contract shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: 1. In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for itself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them. that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed or the improvements thereon or to be constructed thereon, nor shall the grantee itself or any person claiming under or through the grantee, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection. location. number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed or such improvements. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." 2. In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself. his heirs. executors. administrators and assigns. and all persons claiming under or through him. and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color. religion, creed, national origin or ancestry. in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, or enjoyment of the land herein leased or the improvements thereon or to be constructed thereon. nor shall the lessee himself. or any person claimin~ under or through the lessee. estab!:.sh or ?TD. 2~-:~e ~:r z?:'iic~.i~.r.,3 Of dxscr~mxn:~,:~on c,.r s~:gregatlon with reference to the selection. location, number. use or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants or vendees of the land herein leased or such improvements." 3. In contracts of sale: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person, or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color, religion, creed. national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land or the improvements thereon or to be constructed thereon, 4;7/99 1480879.1 - 30 - nor shall the transferee himself or any person claiming under or through the transferee, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the land or such improvements." 7. Operation, Maintenance and Repair. Habitat shall have full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of all improvements on the Property throughout the duration of the Term. Habitat shall, upon completion of the Project maintain in the manner of first class residential projects, in a first class, neat, clean, safe and sanitary condition and repair, the improvements comprising the Project and all landscaping within the public rights of way which may abut the Property throughout the Term of this Agreement without expense to Agency, and shall perform all repairs and replacements necessary to maintain and preserve said improvements and landscaping in a first class, neat. clean, safe, sanitary and healthy condition in a manner reasonably satisfactory to Agency and in compliance with all applicable laws, and in compliance with all applicable laws and the DDA. 8. Violation of Regulatorv Apreement. Agreement. (a) Habitat shall perform each and every obligation set forth in this (b) In the event of the violation by Habitat of any of the provisions of this Agreement, then Agency shall give written notice thereof to Habitat and the successor owner of the Property at the time of the violation by registered mail addressed to Habitat and the successor owner at the addresses stated in this Agreement, or to such other address as may have been designated by Habitat. Any such violation shall be cured to the satisfaction of Agency within the 30 days after the date such notice is received, or if such violation is a non-monetary obligation that cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 day period, then Habitat fails to cure or to commence to cure such violation within said 30 day period and fails diligently to prosecute such cure to completion as soon as reasonably possible but, in not event, no later than three (3) months after notice of such violation. After conveyance of the Property by Habitat, Habitat shall have the right, but not the duty, to cure such violations. If the Habitat fails to cure of commence to cure the violations within said periods. then Agency may without further notice, declare in writing a default under this Agreement effective on the date of such declaration of default, and upon any such declaration of default Agency may apply to any court, State or Federal, for specific performance of this Agreement. for an injunction aeainst any violation by Habitat of this Agreement. or for such other r~i~ef as may De appropriate, including without limitation damages, and the cost to Agency in enforcing the terms of this Agreement (including the reasonable time expended by Agency staff, consultants, auditors, attorneys and other personnel involved in such enforcement). (c) The remedies of Agency herein, or under any other instrument providing for or evidencing the financial assistance provided herein, are cumulative, and the 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 31 - exercise of one or more of such remedies shall not be deemed an election of all remedies and shall not preclude the exercise by Agency of any one or more of its other remedies. (d) Agency shall provide by mail copies of any notice of any violation to all other lien holders who have delivered a request therefor to the Agency and have also recorded a Request for Special Notice in accordance with California Civil Code Section 2924e (as amended), at the address for notices most recently provided by Habitat or such lien holders for such notices, and such parties shall have the same right to cure Owner's defaults hereunder on behalf of Owner. (e) Agency may terminate all or portions of this Agreement at any time. for any reason. Any such termination or partial termination shall be effective upon notice of such termination or partial termination being recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County. 9. General Provisions. (a) The covenants which have been established pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to be covenants running with the land for the benefit of the Project Area and Agency in carrying out its statutory responsibilities under California Redevelopment Act (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.) to implement the Redevelopment Plan and to provide for the development of low and moderate income housing in the community. The covenants hereof shall be binding upon the Property and run for the benefit of the Project Area and Agency and its successors and assigns, and such covenants shall run in favor of Agency for the entire period during which such covenants shall be in force and effect, without regard to whether Agency is or remains an owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate. Agency is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the covenants running with the land, for and in its own rights and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private. in whose favor and for whose benefit this Agreement and the Covenants rurming with the land have been provided. Only Agency and its successors in interest may enforce this Agreement; nothing herein is intended to create any third party beneficiaries to this Agreement, and no person or entity other than Agency or Owner, and the permitted successors and assigns of either of them, shall be authorized to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Not by way of limitation of the foregoing, the tenants of the Property are not intended to be third party beneficiaries hereunder. (b~ This Agreement and the covenants reservations. restrictions and agreemen:s :c,n:ain~d herein shall 0~ a burden upon the Property and shall bind Owner. ~ts successors and assigns with respect to the Property. Habitat may not assign any of the benefits of this Agreement, or delegate any of Owner's obligations hereunder, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of Agency. (c) The covenants and obligations contained in Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 shall remain in effect until the expiration of the Term provided for in Section 2 hereof, and 4/7199 1480879.1 ' 32 - the covenants against discrimination provided for in subsections 6(c) and 6(d) shall remain in perpetuity. (d) Agency and its successors and assigns, and Habitat and its successors and assigns as holders of the ground leasehold interest in the Property, shall have the right to consent and agree to changes in, or to eliminate in whole or in part, any of the covenants, reservations and restrictions contained in this Agreement. (e) This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and may not be altered or amended except by writing executed between the parties to be charged. (f) In any action between the parties to interpret, enforce, reform. modify, rescind, or otherwise in connection with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in the action shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, reasonable costs and expenses including, without limitation, litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. (g) If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any circumstance, shall, at any time or to any extent, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application thereof to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term, covenant, condition and provision of this Agreement, shall be valid and enforceable, to the fullest extent permitted by law. (h) The use of the plural in this Agreement shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural, and the use of one gender shall be deemed to include all genders. (i) Time is of the essence hereof. (j) No waiver by Agency of any breach of or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. (k) This Agreement and all related documents shall be deemed to be contracts made and delivered in the State of California and shall be governed and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of said State. Headings and titles herein are for convenience only and shall not influence any construction or interpretation. (1) Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be given by personal service or by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, at the addresses specified below, or at such other addresses as may be specified in writing by the parties hereto as follows, and shall be effective on the third business day following deposit in the mail or upon receipt if by personal delivery to the addresses set forth herein: a/7/99 1480879.1 - 33 - If to Agency: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Executive Director With a copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon 333 South Hope Street, 381h Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Attn.: Peter Thorson If to Habitat: In/and Valley Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Post Office Box 0765 Murietta, California 92564-0765. With a Copy to: Owner 42220 6th St. Temecula, California 92589 (m) This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of which shall be deemed to be an original. 4/7/99 1480879.1 - 34 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hemto have entered into this Regulatory Agreement as of the day and year first above written. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Karel F. Lindemans Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson Agency Counsel INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, a California Non-Profit Corporation Name: Title: By: Name: Title: - 35 - 4/7/99 1480879.1 State of California County of Riverside ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ) On , 1999, before me, , personally appeared n personally known to me -OR- proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY - 36 - 417199 1480879. I State of California County of Riverside ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ) On , 1999, before me, , personally appeared [] personally known to me -OR- Fl proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY - 37 - 4/7/99 1480879.1 EXHIBIT NO. I TO REGULATORY AGREEMENT SITE MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTHEASTERLY 120 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 240 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 70 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF THAT TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY USED AS A RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND STATION GROUNDS OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, CONVEYED TO N. R. VAIL, ET AL, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 1 !. 1940 IN BOOK 46: PAGE 505 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID PROPERTY BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 27. AS SHOWN BY MAP OF TEMECULA ON FILE IN BOOK !5 PAGE 726 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT I. BLOCK 36, AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 10. BLOCK 37, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 25, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ..:,oS:o,,ec sy: AGENCY: By Habitat: By -39- EXHIBIT 4. CERTIHCATE OF COMPLETION RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Clerk/Secretary Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Sec. 6103 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS TO REAL PROPERTY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula ("Agency") hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: a. On . 1999 the Agency and Habitat for Humani,v, :: California. a Califorr, xa Non-Profit Corporauon ("Habitat"), entered into that certmn agreement entitled "DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC." CDDA") which agreement provides for the conveyance of certain real property owned by the Agency to Habitat for the development of very low income homes. b. The DDA was recorded as Document No. Recorcts of Riverside County on , 1999. in the Official c. The real property which is the subject of the DDA and this Certificate of Completion is located at , Temecula California and is legally described on Exhibit A., Legal Description, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full ("Site"). d. The DDA provides that the Agency shall furnish Habitat with a Certificate of Completion upon the completion of the physical improvements to the Site. - 39 - 4/7/99 1480879.1 e. The Agency has inspected the Site and the physical improvements constructed thereon. Section 2. Certification of Completion of Physical Improvements. The Agency does hereby certify that the physical improvements to the Site as required by the DDA have been fully and satisfactorily performed and completed. Nothing herein shall amend or modify the obligations of Habitat or its successors with respect to the Regulatory Agreement Containing Covenants Affecting Real Property, recorded with respect to the Site on , 1999 as Document No. in the Official Records of Riverside County on , 1999. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Agency has executed this certificate as of REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Karel F. Lindemans Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson Agency Counsel -40- 417199 1480879.1 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Apdl 20, 1999 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of March 23, 1999 for the Redevelopment Department. This report covers Housing and Redevelopment. HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Pro;ram Funding in the amount of $400,000 is available for FY 98-99. 15 Loans have been closed for $313,760 with 1 loan pending. Residential Improvement Prowlrams For FY 98/99, 32 projects have been completed and 12 are in process. The program budget is $200,000 and $119,920.60 has been funded. The majority of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement. Loan ManaQement The Deoartment is negotiating a contract with a loan management company for !on~o-~erm collection ano management of the Agency's portfoiio of Res;oentiat Improvement and First Time Homebuyer loans. Affordable Rental Housin; Projects Agency staff has the responsibility for monitoring all projects obtaining Agency assistance to rehabilitate existing affordable rental housing as well as new construction. After completion, annual reporting is required to ensure all tenants continue to meet income criteria outlined in the Project Regulatory Agreement and that all rents charged are within established affordable limits. Review of a 30-unit project, Rancho Creek Apartments, has been completed and the project is in compliance with affordability covenants. North Pujol Redevelonment Project Rehabilitation of 38 distressed affordable housing units is underway, and grading has begun for the construction of 38 new units. All units will be occupied by very low and low-income families. OLD TOWN Old Town Streetscape Iml3rovement Projects Completion of the Streetscape improvement project is neady complete. All major improvements have been installed and only minor "tie backs" and some detail work remains to be completed. The sound system is operational and the gateway arches have been installed. The flag poles located near the Gateway Arches will be completed shortly. Staff is working on the Gateway plaques and the time capsule. Facade Improvement/Non-Conformin; Sian Proaram The following facade improvement/sign projects are completed: · Express Bodicare (new business on Front Street) - New signs only · Musicians Workshop (Mercedes) - New handicap parking and restroom facilities, new front windows and front entry door The following facade improvements are underway: · Second Street Automotive (Second and Mercedes) Complete Facade Renovation · Rancon Building (Front Street) - Repaint Tdm · Kreigers General Store (Mercedes) New exterior facade and handicap restroom facilities · U.S. Land (Front Street) Extedor Paint · Swing Inn (Front Street) - Extedor Paint R :\syersk\monthly~report.Jan 2 ITEM 8 TY MANAGER !~"~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City CouncillActjng City Manager Gary Thomhill, Community Development Director/~'~'''' DATE: Apdl 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Presentation of the Final Report for the Hotel Conference Center Feasibility Analysis prepared by Keyser Marston Associates and Scott Hospitality Consultants Prepared By: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council do the following: Provide direction to staff concerning the Council's interest in the City's possible participation in a convention/conference facility, and If the Council is interested in proceeding with this project, direct staff to work with the Economic Development Subcommittee (or an ad-hoc Council subcommittee) to consider the options and issues and to develop a process for the Coundl to consider the facts and make a final decision. BACKGROUND: The Council directed the City Manager to enter into a contract with Keyser-Marston Associates to analyze the feasibility of participating in, or constructing, a convention/conference center on September 8, 1998. The study would evaluate the following: Local Area Economic Overview Conference Center Market Demand Hotel Market Demand Evaluation of Potential Sites Financial Feasibility Assessment Economic Benefits and Impacts Recommendations Tne resulzs of the Stuay are summarized below.: 2. 3. 4. A freestanding Conference Center (without another 150-room first class hotel) is not economically viable. Another 150-room first class hotel without a Conference Center should be economically viable by 2003 or 2004. Another 150-room first class hotel with an associated Conference Center should be economically viable by 2002. A Conference Center with another 150-room first class hotel is feasible if the City participates in the Conference Center portion of the project. The City's participation/ assistance in the Conference Center will need to be in the order of $4 to $5 million. R:\STAFFR=PI~,IKeyser Marsran Convention - Conference PSA (~/12/99 klb 1 The final draft of the Study was presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee in March, 1999. At that meeting the Subcommittee derided that the results of the Study were promising and that the entire Council should consider this matter. The authors of the report, Kate Funk with Keyser Marston Associates and Jay Scott with Scott Hospitality Consultants, are in attendance and are prepared to present the Study to the City Coundl. The Council has previously received a copy of the Final Report. FISCAL IMPACT: None Pc\STA_F'/P, FBIKey~er Manton Convention - Conferen~ PSA 04112199 klb ~ ITEM 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROV?~LCE~ ITY ATTORNEY RECTOR OF FINA CE ~ C TY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~~ April 20, 1999 Recommendations for. Implementing Economic Development Strategy Report by Dr. John Husing RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize implementation of the Economic Development Strategy Report as outlined in the staff report. BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1998, John Husing presented his "Economic Development Strategy" report to the City Council. This report was considered by the City Council at your January 26, 1999 meeting, but was continued for further discussion. DISCUSSION: The real value of a strategic planning report, such as prepared by Dr. Husing, is to allow an organization to build on its strengths and to minimize its weaknesses. This is done through a systematic identification of strengths and weaknesses, followed by thought and discussion, leading to action. With this in mind, Staff has reviewed Dr. Husing's recommendations, and has prepared a suggested approach for each recommendation. These recommendations are ......... the s~aff report 19~9, u ,=,, ,=,., in catec jan,~asy 26, which is attaches. On an overall basis, staff recommends that we work with the Council's Economic Development Subcommittee and the EDC of Southwest Riverside County to develop a more focused vision statement for our economic development activities. This vision statement would be brought back to the overall Council for review and adoption. As part of this effort staff also recommends that we further develop our information base of land and employment data. These recommendations are consistent with the draft work program of the EDC for the upcoming fiscal year. Husing Council Report April 20, 1999 1 Finally, at your January 26 meeting, the City Council indicated an interest in several water- related issues. Representatives of the Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts are planning to attend your meeting and will be available to answer questions. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff report dated January 26, 1999 2. Economic Development Strategy Report dated December 2, 1998 Husing Council Report April 20, 1999 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council James B. O'Grady, Assistant City Manag'~--'~Vv't'' January 26, 1999 Recommendations for Implementing Economic Development Strategy Report by Dr. John Husing RECOMMENDATION: Implement recommendations of the Husing Economic Development Strategy report as outlined in the following staff report. BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1998, John Husing presented his "Economic Development Strategy" report to the City Council. Dr. Husing presented a vadety of economic and demographic data, and also made a number of findings and recommendations. This report presents Dr. Husings findings and recommendations and presents staffs recommendations for each of the issue areas discussed by Dr. Husing. Husing Report Findings In a strategic planning study, it is typical to assess an organization's strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of such an exercise is to allow the organization to build upon its strengths, and to take steps to mitigate its weaknesses. Correspondingly, Dr. Husing noted a number of strengths and weaknesses related to the City's overall economic position. These strengths and weaknesses are summanzed below and form the basis of Dr. Husing's recommendations. Temecula's Strengths !~ ~ Temecula's Weaknesses .-;~gn cuajir), of life -excelient sc.'~ools. low ~ Reiatlveiy remcte from co~ie~es ar-,c. un~versmes. cnme rate, numerous and well-kept parks. Relatively low housing pnces (compared to coastal areas) Rapid population growth. Job growth lags population increases, resulting in long commutes for many workers. Traffic congestion. Strategically located between San Diego and Orange County/Los Angeles markets. Higher transportation costs than communities closer to ocean and rail terminals. Lack of bdne line. Flusrag reportcouncil jan 26.99 1 Temecula's Strengths Relatively high personal income of residents, and relatively high taxable retail sales (and sales tax receipts) Temecula has relatively highly trained workers, and many of these workers have indicated a willingness to work for somewhat lower wages if long job commutes could be eliminated Strong toufism base, cooling ocean breezes, excellent climate for growing of wine grapes Temecula's-Weaknesses Relatively high land costs for industrial land (compared to other Inland Empire areas) Long commute times for workers "Primary" jobs offer the greatest economic multiplier effect. Eastside reservoir may increase traffic congestion. Study Conclusions / Staff Recommendations Following is a listing of the issues and recommendations as presented in Dr. Husing's report These are presented in the same order and numbering as the report. The corresponding staff recommendations are presented next to each of Dr. Husing's recommendations. Husing Report Issues t Recommendation Staff Recommendation ~-4. What is the ultimate objective of Temecula's economic development program? Rec.: The City Council should adopt a policy statement that Temecula's economic de;;eiopment program makes the expansion of "economic base" sectors its pnmary objective. Development of pdmary jobs (typically industrial uses) should be a primary objective of the City's economic development program. This is consistent with cun'ent programs and policies. For example, Goal #1 of the City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan calls for "Development of a strong base of ciea which employs a skilleo labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's community character". Although this is a good overall objective, it would be helpful to refine this statement. Our overall objective should also be coordinated with any economic development incentive policies of Une Ci~. StE. recommer'.:s ~'~at a more refinen statement of objectives and general guidelines for incentives be discussed with EDC members and then the Economic Development subcommittee of the City Council. The recommended policy would then be sent to the full City Council for discussion and adoption. Specific incentives would continue to be discussed on a case-by-case basis with the Council/Redevelopment Agency. Although creation of pdmary jobs is important, a healthy economic base should consist of strong HusJn9 repoll. counc~Uan 26,99 2 Husing Report Issues/ Recommendation #5. An independent derivation of industrial data is needed: covedng industnal space inventory, rate of space absorption, square footage of vacant/about to be vacant space and companson of lease rates. Rec.: That the City contract with an "outside" commercial real estate firm to develop such a database. #7. Temecula should engage Mumeta and area water districts in discussions of how to fund and build a 14 mile bdne line to Railroad Canyon Road at the 1-15. Rec.: The City Council should consider appointing a Council Committee to meet with board members of the Eastern MWD to start the process of putting the city in the planning loop on bnne line matters. Staff Recommendation .... tourism, retail and service segments as well. Even within the industrial classifications, some diversity is good so as to avoid a "boom or bust" economy. The City should periodically monitor its overall employment base to ensure that a balance of jobs is being provided. Finally, "quality of life" is an important factor in many companies' decisions to relocate or expand. Temecula should not compromise its commitment to a safe community, -environmental safeguarcis, cultural opportunities, and an attractive place to live and work in its quest to create jobs. To do so could be shortsighted. Such a database is needed and should be developed. Local brokers have offered to assist with development of such a database. Staff has initiated discussions with local brokers to try to develop this database. City staff members have met with staff of the Rancho Water District. At this time, Rancho does not have need for a bdne line. That could change in the future, should Rancho ever decide to filter water through reverse osmosis treatment. Rancho has no such plans at this time, however. Staff should meet with the Manufacturers Council, international Recti~er, Eastern Municipal Water Distdct and possibly others to determine the need for and value of such a line. The potential use, location, benefits, costs and high water use are just some of the factors that should be considered in determining whether the City should pursue construction of such a line. #8. Information exchanges and brain storming among professionals from local cities and water agencies should occur among the local cities and the water agencies about how to mitigate the high infrastructure costs. Rec.: Open a dialog about creating regular meetings and/or periodic workshops where city and water agency staffs could share Staff from Temecula and the water districts cun'ently have some interaction, typically as part of the development review process. A number of City staff members will be meeting with Rancho staff to better understand the overall structure and mission of each agency. This meeting is scheduled for February 2, 1999. Staff from Eastern had previously approached City staff about making a presentation to the City Council Husmg reportcouncil jan 28.99 3 Husing Report Issues I Recommendation information and build relationships. #9. Eastern and Rancho allow developers to spread the cost of their fees over time. The interest rate is 10% and prime, respectively. This is higher than their borrowing rate or rate on return on their investments through the Local Agency Investment Fund. Staff Recommendationi::-i: regarding their fee structure. This presentation is tentatively scheduled for the first Council meeting in February. The EDC of Southwest Riverside County is also examining their operating structure and has recognized the value in trying to include Rancho and Eastem as part of the EDC. City staff has met with the staff of Rancho California Water district regarding this issue. Rancho staff indicated a willingness to explore this issue with their board. Staff will initiate similar discussions with Eastern. Rec.: Initiate discussions with the water agencies to explore lower interest rates for developers. #3. How can Temecula's highly trained commuter-workers, who are willing to work for a little less to avoid ddving long distances, be identified, quantified, and information about them used to recruit employers to the city? Rec.: Develop a system (probably intemet- based) to post job openings and confidentially allow prospective workers to respond. The system should also be capaDle of compiling sum man/statisti; tr',at can be used in economic development efforts. Explore such an interactive system as recommended. Obtaining a qualified labor force is a cdtical question for prospective (and existing) employers. Although it appears that the technology is available for such a system, the larger questions of obtaining the information, maintaining this database, and publicizing the data must be answered before such a system would be truly useful. Several steps are already underway that will help provide this type of information. Temecula has been working with the County of Riverslee, San jac mto Community College, the EDC and others to create a "one stop" employment and training center in Temecula. This center is expected to open in approximately three months. In addition, Riverside County is developing a system of job kiosks throughout the County, with two such kiosks planned for Temecula. These kiosks will host a variety of job- re~a'.~:: '-,:.~rmaLion ana will a!ss :,royDe access to sponsors' web pages. Temecuia will be one of the sponsors of these kiosks. #6. City policies can affect the costs of doing business in the City. This, in turn, can make migration of "basic tier industries more or less likely, depending on the City's Husmg rel)oR. counal.lan 26.99 Although somewhat different than proposed by Dr. Husing, the Press-Enterprise will be hosting a job fair in Apdl. The Press-Enterprise is working with the EDC as well as the City in sponsoring this event. In a recent survey of development impact fees, Temecula's were found to be in the mid to upper middle range of such fees. However, these fees are used to construct public infrastructure, such as Husing Report Issues i Recommendation policies. Rec.: Examine the City's fees and work to make these fees less costly than other areas so as to improve Temecula's cost- competitiveness. Staff Recommendation streets, and investment in such facilities is critical to the long-term well being of the community. One method to try to minimize these costs is for Temecula to continue to seek grant funding to help provide needed capital facilities. Temecula has been successful in obtaining grant funding for several of its major roadway projects. At the time that Council approved raising development impact fees, Council expressed concem that residential properties may not De paying the full costs of providing needed public facilities. Staff is cun'ently exploring the feasibility of updating our development impact fee study to address this issue and will report back to the Council on the process and costs for conducting such an update. Temecula's business license fees are substantially less than other cities surveyed. This information is included in our materials that are provided to firms interested in locating in Temecula. Staff should survey other communities to determine Temecula's relative cost of providing other development-related fees (e.g. plan check). VVhile fees for these services are typically based on the cost of providing such services, fees that are substantially lower or higher than other communities could indicate a need to review of our processes (if our fees are higher), or could be used in our marketing materials (if our fees are lower). Finally, the speed of development review can be even more important than the fees for some businesses. Temecula's fast-track process is featured in our business brochures and will continue to be an important part of the City's economic development efforts. City staff also work, on an ongoing basis, with the business community and organizations su:,~, as the Chamber of Commerce ana une EDC to aclaress aevelopment-related issues. #13. Should there be changes in the structure of Temecula's economic development effort? Rec.: Using information from the State EDD, Temecula should work with the EDC to priodtize firms for business retention efforts. Regular meetings between the EDC, Chamber, and City staff have been initiated. These meetings are ongoing and are used to exchange information and to examine areas of increased coordination and cooperation. We are currently reviewing our "leads" programs, and an upcoming meeting will systematically review our intemet web pages to better coordinate these efforts. husm9 reDortcoun~ljan 26.99 The EDC does have an active and well-organized 5 -.Husing Report Issues t. Recommendation Staff RecommendaUon :!..:::! :~ business retention program, and City staff has been attending these meetings on a regular basis. Staff has also stated that they are available to attend site visits by the EDC. Some such meetings have occurred, and it is expected that this involvement will increase. Staff has used certain property and sales tax information to help the EDC develop contact lists. Staff plans to continue and expand this effort by using EDD data (with appropriate cen~dentiality measures) to help develop priority contact lists. The EDC has also appointed a subcommittee (which includes City staff) to explore methods that existing businesses might be recognized. Recommendations of this subcommittee will be brought to the Economic Development Subcommittee and full City Council as appropnate. #14. What industry classifications should Temecula target in its efforts to expand Temecula's economy? Rec.: Target the following ten sectors, and using EDD data, contact firms in these classifications to help focus future economic development activities. These sectors are: It is appropriate to "target" businesses for surveys and site visits. Target sectors should be reviewed with the Council subcommittee as part of refinement of the overall economic development objective (see first recommendation), as well as the EDC. Mfg: Electronic Equipment Mfg: Printing and Publishing Construction: General Nonresidential Bldg. Mfg: Pnmary & FaDncatecl Metals Basic Service: Wholesale Electronics Construction: Other Specialty Contractors Mfg: Instruments and Related Basic Service: Wholesale Medical Mfg: industn~ M~nir, ery Basic Service: Wholesale Plastic, Chemical, Petroleum #1. Increased participation by Mt. San Jacinto College with local businesses is needed. Rec.: Contact Mr. Eugene Kadow, Chairman of the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees to begin exploring opportunities for increased participation by Mt. San Jacinto College in economic Husmg report counc~l lan 25.99 Contractors- Mt. San Jacinto College staff has been involved in development of the "One Stop" project. Staff has not yet initiated contact with Mr. Kadow, but has previously met with Dean King of the business school at Mt. San Jacinto. City Council may prefer to initiate such contact, or could direct staff to initiate the contact with Mr. Kadow. Staff has initiated discussions with Dennis Frank, of Husing Report Issues 1 Recommendation development activities. #10 Temecula should identify projects for inclusion in any future Measure A list of pnonty projects. Rec.: Continue participation in the Riverside County Transportation Commission. =i i. A,n easier SO,~,,'TlUte between ML;met,= and Temecula has advantages for both communities. Rec.: ExDIore methods to begin a dialog on circulation issues with the City of Mum eta. #12. The Eastside Reservoir will affect -emecula - most notably through increased taunsm anc~ incrsasec~ traffic. Rec.: Temecula should become involved with the Metropolitan Water District's advisory groups. Staff Recommendation.: - i: . the UC Riverside Extension, regarding training programs for new and existing businesses. UC Riverside currently will provide custom training programs, and is interested in working with the City, the EDC, and possibly Mt. San Jacinto Community College to develop materials to include in our economic development marketing efforts. Mr. Frank has also indicated an interest in participating in site visits with existing and prospective firms where such firms have an interest in training programs. Staff has also worked with other Universities, including the University of Redlands, Cal State" San Bemardino. and Cal State San Marcas on educational programs. Agree with Dr. Husing. Councilmember Roberts has been very active in the RCTC, and other Councilmembers are also active in regional commissions. In addition, continue to pursue opportunities for grant funding, and work with the Riverside County staff and Board of Supervisors to try to ensure that appropriate measures are provided to help mitigate impacts from projects outside of the City of Temecula. In addition to roadway projects, the City should work to provide altemative methods of transportation and congestion reduction. These include land use planning, providing bicycle trails, encouragement of carpooling and staggered work hours for employers, and improved public transportation including development of a high-speed rail line. Such a aialog is essential to solving regDnal traff. c issues. Council has expressed an interest in beginning such a dialog and has appointed Mayor Ford and Gouncilmember Roberts as the Gity's liaison to the City of Mumeta. Staff is now attempting to arrange a tour for Council and staff of the Eastside reservoir proiect. Staff and tne Council have monitored tinis project for some time as it does have the potential to significantly affect Temecula and the surrounding communities FISCAL IMPACT: The recommendations outlined above are based on current staffing and resources and are not expected to create a significant fiscal impact at this time. ~uslng rel~ortcounoi jan 2699 7 Economic Development Strategy City of Temecula Final Report Prepared by John E. Husing, Ph.D. December 2, 1998 ECAP economic & political analysis 3142 Cactus Circle Highland, CA 92346 (909)425-8952 (phone) (909)425-0601 (fax) john_husing~eee.org Introduction 1. Quality of Life. Beauty Low Crime Rates Pa~ks Education Higher Education Temecula Economic Development Strategy Table Of Contents Topic L THE DATA & THE ISSUES v/Issue #1. Great involvement of Mt. San Jacinto College with economic development efforts 2. Rapid Population Growth. 3. Local Jobs & Job Deficit. v/Issue #2. What can be done to close the area's "jobs to workers" gap? 4. Commuters Time On The Road Willing To Work Locally For Less Why would commuters work for less v/Issue #3. Using Commuters Has An Economic Development Asset 5. Home Sales Record Home Volumes Home Prices Rebound Heajthv Home Max~c5 Exacerbate Commuter Problem 6. Industrial Real Estate "Basic Tier" Finns & Economic Strategy Manufacturers Service Tourist venues Commuters Secondan' Tier Firms ,''issue n4. Expand "Basic" Tier for jobs or ' Secondary" Tier For Sales Taxes Industrial Real Estate Data Inventory of total industrial space Absorption rate at which space is being taken by new occupants Square footage that is either vacant or occupied but about to be vacant Lease rate per square foot compared to ~ompetitive markets v/Issue #5. Obtaining industrial real estate market that can be trusted Page 6 10 Temecula Economic Development Strategy i 12/02/98 lnclu.~al Real Estate Price Cost Of Distance. Competitive Places Ch~o San Mamos Corona. Riverside (Los Angeles Market) Riverside (Orange Co. Market) Table Of Contents Topic Tvoes Of Vehicles Double axle tractor & trailer Single axle tractor & trailer 2 4-foot truck Automobile -/Issue #6. City. Budget Can Increase Or DeCrease Likclih00d of Firms _Migrating To Temecula 8, Brine line -/Issue #7. Funding A 14 mile Brine Line 9, Water & Sewage Hook-Up Fees Residential Water Residential Sewer Industrial Water Capacity Industrial Sewer Capacity -/Issue #8. Involving Water Agencies In Economic Development Strategy -/Issue #9. Financing Water & Sewer Hook-Ups At Tree Cost of Funds 10, Personal Income 11. Taxable Retail Trade Per Capita Retail Sales 12, Traffic I- 15 at Winchester Road I-15 at P, ancho California Road 1-15 at Route 79 South & Pala Road Other Improvements -/Issue #10. Ensunng Temecula's Regmnal Project Are On The Next Measure A Priority List -/Issue # 11. Cooperation of Temecula & Mumeta on linking Diaz Road To Washington Ave. 13, Other Issues A. Eastside Reservoir & Tourism -/Issue # 12. Involving Temecula In The Planning For The Eastside Reservoir. B, Organization of Economic Development Temecttla Valley Economic Development Corn. oration Temecula Cha;n~r of Co,'ranercc City of Temecula -/Issue #13. Should them be changes m Temecula's economic development effort? C. Industry Targets -/Issue #14 What should be Temecula's Industry Targets For Economic Development. It TIlt ISSUES & T!tE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Fundamental Policy Question -/Issue ,/Issue #2 Page 13 15 16 18 18 2O 21 21 22 22 26 Temecula Economic Development Strategy ii 12/02/98 Table Of Contents Topic Recommendation Next Step 2. Competitivehess A. Quality of Life B. Costs Distance & Cost Space Cost v/Issue #5. Recommendation Next Step Brine Line Costs · "Issue #7 Recommendation Next Step Water & Sewer Fees ,/Issue #8 Recommendation Next Step ¢'Issue #9 Recommendation Next Step Workers As A Cost Advantage ,/Issue #3 Recommendation Next Step Costs & Governmental Policy · /Issue #6 Recommendation Next Step 3. Or~.,anization of Economic Actifitv ,/Issue #13 A, Organization Explanation Database Program of contact Next Step B. Targets ,/Issue #14 Recommendation Highest average pay in 1996 (10) Largest increase in jobs from 1991-1996 (6) Most jobs in 1996 (3) Largest increase in average pay between 1991-1996 (4) Fastest percentage of job growth, 1991-1996 (3) Largest number of new firms in a sector, 1991-1996 (5) Next Step C. Education ,/Issue #1 Recommendation. Next Step Page 27 27 27 27 27 28 29 29 31 31 31 32 33 Temecula Economic Development Strategy iii 12/02/98 Table Of Contents D. Other Issues Transportation /Issue #10 l~ecommendation Next Step ~Issue # 11 Recommendation Next Step Eastside Reservoir /Issue #12 Recommendation Next Step Topic APPENDIX A Notes From Earlier Focus Group Digunions The Focus Groups What The Focus Groups Revealed Traffic & Transl~rtation Commuting Space Cost Infrastructure Cost DI:F Fees Labor Force Training Organization of Economic Development Market Niche 35 36 36 36 37 37 38 38 38 39 39 Temecula Economic Development Strategy iv 12/02/98 Temecula Economic Development Strategy Table of Exhibits Exhibits Exhibit 1.-Major Crime Per 100,000 Temect~a vs. Major Inland Empire Cities, 1996. Exhibit 2.-Seniors: SAT Average Total Scores, Selected Riverside County School Districts, 1996 Exhibit 3.-Testing Scores By Subject Matter, 10th Graders Riverside County, Selected Districts, 1998 Exhibit 4.- Population Temecula & Temecula Valley, 1990=1998 Exhibit 5.-Emplo.vees Living in ~e Temecula Valley, 1990-1998 Exhibit 6.-Employment By Firms Within City Zip Codes, 1990-1998 Exhibit 7 City zip code jobs and area resident workers, Temecula & Temecula Valley, 1991-1998 Exhibit 8.-Local (31.8%) Vs. Commuter (68.2) Temecula Valley, 1997 Exhibit 9.-Willingness To Make Less To Work Locally (45.7%) Temecula Valley, 1997 Exhibit 10.-Occupations Of Commuters Willing To Work For Less Temecula Valley, 1997 Exhibit 11.-Home Price Advantage, Temecula & So. Calff. Markets, Median Priced Homes, 2"d qtr 1998 Exhibit 12.-Total Deed Recordings (seasonally adjusted), Temecula, quarterly, 1988-1998 Exhibit 13.-All Home Median Prices, Temecula, 1988-1998 Exhibit 14.-Industrial Real Estate Data, Inland Empire & North San Diego County, 1998 Exhibit 15.-Shipping Costs From Temecula Vs. Competitive Cities, 1998 E.'dtibit 16.-Residential Water Hook Up Charges, Temecula Area, 1998 Exhibit 17.-Residential Sewer Hook Up Charges, Temecnla Area, 1998 Exhibit 18.-Median Family & Total Personal Income Cities In Riverside County, 1997 Exhibit 19.-Total Taxable Sales (000) Temecula, 1991-1997 Exhibit 20.-Taxable Sales Per Capita, Inland Empire Cities 100,000 Or More, 1997 Ex~bi'. 21.-Road Construction To Ease Temecula's Traffic Delays. 1998-2001 E.'dUbit 22.-Largest Job Growth, 10 Highest of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula, 1991-1996 Exhibit 23.-Largest Payroll Growth, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula, 1991-1996 Exhibit 24.-Highest Employment Level, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula, 1996 Exlfibit Exhibit E,yd~ibit Exhibit 25.-Highest Average Pay Level, l0 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula, 1996 26.-Highest Average Pay Increase, I0 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temectda, 1991 27.-Highest Increase In Number Of Finns, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula, 1991 - 1996 28 -Highest Percent Increase In Jobs, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Tem~ula. 1991 29.-Highest Average Pay Level, 10 Highest Of All 95 Sectors Temecula, 1996 30.-Best 10 Sector Targets Of 38 Basic Sectors,,Temecula, 1991-1996 Page 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 12 14 16 17 18 19 19 2C 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 26 33 Temecula Economic Development Strategy v 12/02/98 Economic Development Strategy City of Temecula Final Renort John E. Husing, Ph.D. As the Southern California economy continues ks economic expansion, Temecula is at a key juncture in its history. The city enjoys some of the strongest economic and demographic indica- tors in the Inland Empire. Its levels of job creation, taxable trade, home sales and values, income, tourist visitation, school performance, and crime rates are all very positive. Residential construc- tion and population are accelerating. The Promenade Mall is poised to open. And, the commu- nity enjoys a reputation as a family oriented, beautiful place to live. Yet, like any community, there are some difficulties. A large percentage of local residents travel long distances to work. Traffic circulation on, off and across the 1-15 is heavily congested at key times of the day. The cost of city industrial space is high by inland standards. The communlty's remoteness creates a transportation cost disadvantage for goods producing firms. Industrial space absorption has been slow. There is no brine line to handle industrial effluent such as that gener- ated by the semi-conductor industry. And, firms located in the city do not have immediate access to an institution of higher learning. .~lone. none of these blemishes will overcome Temecula's competitive advantages, However. with population growth poised to accelerate, they can collectively begin having a detrimental impact. Given the high quality of leadership that has marked Temecula's history, this is unlikely. Rather, these dilemmas represent the challenges to be overcome by the priorities, strategies and actions of the current generation of public and private leaders. The purpose of this report is to focus on these problem areas and recommend strategies for addressing them. I. THE DATA & THE ISSUES 1. Quality of Life. Many years ago, this analyst was asked to recommend what data about Temecula should be emphasized-in the. city's economic development marketing. The response was: "Take pictures!" That was not said lightly. Quality of life has always been a major criteria used by entrepreneurs and executives in deciding where to locate their operations. Once the I-15 freeway was completed, Temecula became the single most beautiful, undeveloped area of South- ern California sitting on a major transportation corridor. Beauty. Nature has endowed Temecula in many different ways. The "gap" in the coastal moun- tains provides Temecula with a sea breeze that is unique for an inland area. It is located far enough from Orange County and San Diego to be free of air quality problems. Good soil and Tcmecula Economic Development Strategy ~ 12/02/98 weather have allowed 13 top quality wineries to develop. The hills surrounding the city provide a picturesque backdrop to the community. These aspects of the community are dit]Scult to quan- fly, but are very real all the same. Low Crime Rates. A major indicator of a community's quality of life that can be documented is its crime rate. Exhibit 1 shows that Temecula's crime rate is almost half that of Rancho Cucamonga. This standard is used as the latter has consistently had one of the lowest crime rates among California cities of over 100,000 people. Exhibit 1 .-Major Crime, Per 100,000 People Temecula & Other Major Inland Empire Cities, 1996 9,466 6.688 6,608 6,373 6,633 6,268 4,189 2,184 _m San Bdno Moreno Valley Riverside Ontario Pomona Fontaria R. Cuca~ Temecula Not~: Population Re'visor by CA ~t Of Finance, 1996 Sotfir, c: U,S. Department of Jus~cc, Uniform Cmnc Rcpon Parks. Another measure of a community's quality of life is the availability of park land. Teme- cula has over 200 acres of parks at 22 sites. That is one acre for each 216 city residents. In con- tras:. tb, a: :.::::~ ~s one acre per 484 residents in Rancho Cucr, monga ana one per 429 in ~7orona. Exhibit 2.-Seniors: SAT Average Total Scores Selected School Districts, Riverside County, 1996-7 1.012 983 982 178 935 Temecula Economic Development Strategy 2 12/02/98 Education. Another key aspect of Temecula's quality of life is the performance of its school system. Exhibit 2 (prior page) shows Riverside County's SAT scores for academic year 1997. Temecula's seniors led the county. Their average score of 1,012 was the only county score above the California average. Meanwhile, the city's juniors/seniors had a 15.1% pass rate on the tough Advanced Placement Tests, the highest in the county and well ahead of the state average (12.3%). On California's 1998 STAR performance tests given to all 2"d to 11~ graders, Temecula's schools also did extremely well. Exhibit 3 shows a typical result. Here, Temecula's 10'a graders are seen outperforming those of every other Riverside County district as well as the California averages. Exhibit 3.-Testing Scores By Subject Matter, 10th Graders Riverside County, Selected Districts, 1998 District Reading Temecula 703 Murrieta 703 Riverside 695 Hemet 692 CALIFORNIA 680 Lake Elsinore 689 Moreno Valley 687 Corona Norco 687 RIVERSIDE CO. 686 San Jacinto 686 Perris 683 Desert Sands 683 Palm Springs 682 Jurupa 681 Alvord 678 So~ce: CA Department of Education Math Language Science Soc. Science 699 ~ ......'MI::.-.!. ~',- 687 681 699 681 685 657 695 672 679 654 692 667 680 654 695 689 ': ' 677 653 693 666 677 652 693 662 673 649 688 665 674 650 689' , 683'" 673 649 686 670 673 650 687 661 673 648 687 660 672 648 687 658 670 646 684 657 669 647 685 655 666 645 Higher Education, Temecula does have education issues. These are at the college and univer- sity level. As a new and rapidly growing community, the city is somewhat remote from the large number of colleges and universities serving Riverside County. The closest campus is the satellite community college campus of Mt. San Jacinto College in Menifee, 20 miles away. The main campus is in San Jacinto, 31 miles away. It is 34 miles to the University of California at Riverside (UCR) and 35 miles to the closest California State University campus in San Marcos. These distances are less relevant to Temecula's students than to its businesses. In the modern economy, direct access to training programs from community colleges, advice from college and university. professors, and access to college graduates and interns has become increasingly impor- ~a, nt. Here, Temecuia's remote location places it at somewhat of a competitive disadvantage. UCR's agriculture and engineering departments, and UC Extension have begun to bridge this gap. The former have begun to provide the city's technical rirms with access to faculty researchers, campus facilities and graduate interns. UCX now offers over 40 career oriented classes in the city. Two excellent reports by The Resource Group have identified areas in which training is re- quired. (Temecula/Murrieta Job Skills & Commuter Census, 1997-1998; The Workforce Report: What City of Temecula Businesses Need For ,4 Competitive & Productive Workforce, 1997). The Riverside County Economic Development Agency is working to provide "one stop" worker Temecula Economic Development Strategy 3 12/02/98 training. And, Mt. San Jacinto College has become increasingly aware that local firms are quite unaware of its course offerings, or willingness to design specialized training programs. /'Issue #1. As Temecula works to retain, expand and recruit businesses, an important tool avail- able to some communities is the direct involvement of college representatives in continuous visi- tation programs to local employers, and as part of organized efforts to retain and expand local rims. As worker training is often the key to such efforts, greatly increased participation of Mt. San Jacinto College in direct contacts with local businesses is needed. How can this be done given the very large geographic area served by that institution.'? 2. Rapid Population Growth. Given Temecula's setting, its quality of life and the opening of the 1-15 freeway, it is not surprising to find that the city and the surrounding Temecula Valley have grown very rapidly. Exhibit 4 presents population data for the period 1990-1998. It shows the city's population increasing from 2%099 to 46,550, a gain of 19,451 people or 71.8"/~. Exhibit 4.-Population Temecula & Temecula Valley, 1990-1998 ['~ Temecula · Temecula Valley 72,010 83.323 89.629 96,412 103.708 111.557 120.000 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 199g Sou.,%-e t oo~ 7ev'.~,~. E2AP Ca~culalaorts Meanwhile, the Temecula Valley (census tracts 432.01 to 432.05) has grown from 66,944 to about 120,000 people, a gain of 53,056 or 79.3°/.. By way of comparison, Riverside County's population grew by 270,824 (23.1%) in this period of time. The Temecula Valley accounted for about 19.6% of the county's growth, and went from 5.7% to 8.3% of its population. Employed Workers. Population growth, of course, implies ~owth in the number of workers living ',,,~thin an area. In 1990, the U.S Census found that !:-. :42 of Te~",ecuia's 27,099 pecpie had jobs or 48.5%. In the broadcr Tcmecula Valtcy, 30,206 of 66,944 wcrc employed or 45.1%. The comparable percentages were 41.7%-in both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, re- flecting the older median ages of the larger region. Using the 45.1% ratio to population, Exhibit 5 shows that by 1998, the number of employed Te- mecula Valley residents should have reached 54,146, a gain of 23,940 workers or 79%. In this period, the CA Employment Development Department estimates that the number of Riverside County employed residents increased from 512,300 to 616,400, a gain of 104,100 workers (20.3%). The Tcmecula Valley's 23,940 new employed residents thus represented 23% of all newly employed county people. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 4 12/02198 30,206 Exhibit 5,-Employees Living In The Temecula Valley 1990-1998 32,492 34,961 37,696 43,502 46,795 50,336 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 199:5 1996 1997 1998 No~: Employed workers m'e 4~.1% ofEaaimsled Potixdaion Sow=: 1990 Cemur, SCAP Cdculsuom 3. Local Jobs & Job Deficit The City of Temecula is the job center for the Temecula Val- ley. While not all jobs are located here, the overwhelming majority are. Exhibit 6 shows that in 1991, the number of jobs in city zip codes totaled 13,590. At the same time, there were 32,492 resident-workers living in the Temecula Valley. There were thus some 18,902 fewer jobs in city zip code than the area had resident-workers. The difference was certainly not made up by jobs in Mumeta or Wildomar zip codes. In 1998, the number of jobs in city zip codes grew to an estimated 21,647, a powerful gain of 8,057 jobs or 59.3%. However, as indicated, the Temecula Valley's even stronger population growth increased the number of area resident-workers to 54,146, a gain of 23,940 or 79%. As a result. the job deficit has widened. zip code Temecula, 1991-1998e ~3.~90 16,366 17,768 18,056 19,714 20,680 21,647 14.506 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199 7e Sowre: CA Employment Devglopmem DcparUnent, ECAP for~tm I 1998e Temecula Economic Development Strategy 5 - 12/02/98 /Issue #2. Putting these calculations together, a widening local job w resident-~orker gap emerges. There were 18,902 fewer jobs in city zip codes than area workers in 1991, that differ- ence is now about 32,500 (Exhibit 7). Clearly, the Temecula Valley's numerous advantages are luring new population and workers much faster than the area economy is producing new jobs. The major economic issue facing Temecula is thus: What can be done to expand the local economy and slow the increase of the area's "jobs to workers" gap? Exhibit 7,-City Zip Code Jobs & Area Resident Workers Ternecula & Ternecula Valley, 1991-1998 (18,902} (20,446) (2~,23~) (22,673) (2s,44s) (27,08Q) (29,656) (32,499) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997~ 1998e . [ Source: ECAP calculations i NOTE.' From 1990-1998, the Inland Empire added 172,000 new resident-workers and 169,000 nc.'Jobs, a deficit of just 3, 000. Thus, during a time when the overall region was seeing a rough balance bem'een resident-worker growth and job growth, the Temecula area was not. 4. Commuters. The employment gap calculations are supported by a December 1997 survey of Temecula Valley workers by The Resource Group (Exhibit 8, next page). It found that 68.2% of workers commuted to jobs outside the area. This is roughly consistent with the 60% difference between the number of Temecula zip code jobs (21,647) and Temecula Valley resident-workers (54, 146). This research found 31.8% of resident-workers worked locally. 25.1% drove to San Diego C.:'untv 21.9%, 'aorked elsewhere in the irdand Emsire: Riverside Co. (17. 7.~a), San Bernardino Co. t4.2%). 17.2% drove to Orange Co. (9.6%) or Los Angeles County (7.6%). Time On The Road. 55% of these commuters are spending a long time in their cars. The Re- source Group found: · 33% had round trip commutes of one to two hours per day. In effect, they are work- ing and driving 45-50 hours a week, for 40 hours pay. · 22% indicate they were driving more than two hours a day. They were thus driving {% or more hours a week, for 40 hours pay. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 6 12/02/98 Exhibit 8.-Local (31.8%) Vs. Commuter (68.2%) Temecula Valley, 1997 Los Angeles Co. 7.6% Orange Co. 9.6% San Bemardino Co. 4.2% Riverside Co. 17.7% Other 4.1% Temecula Valley /" 31.8% San Diego Co, 25.1% Source: Th= R~outcc Group Willing To Work Locally For Less. It is not a surprise that many of these commuters (45. 7%) would prefer to work in the Temecula Valley, and are willing to accept less income to do so. Exhibit 9.-Willingness To Make Less To Work Locally (45.~"~ Temecula Valley, 1997 20% Less Pay 3.1% 15% Less Pay 10% Less Pay 16.2% 25% Less Pay 1,2% 5% Less Pay 20.9% No Pay Cut 54.3% Sotr,~: The R=sourcc Croup · · · · Temccula Economic Development Strategy 20.9% would take pay cuts up to 5% (Exhibit 9). 16.2% would accept up to 10% less. 8.6% would accept reduction of up to 15% to 25%. 54.3% are not willing to accept less pay to avoiding driving. 7 1~0~98 Why would commuters work for less? For some, the long drives place an inordinate burden on their families. Others are tired of driving. Still others have concluded that the combination of 40 hours pay at a lower rate, but with free time, is worth more than higher pay for a combination of 40 hours of work and up to 20 hours of driving. While the growing number of Temecula Valley's residents who must commute creates an issue for the community, Exhibit 10 indicates that it is also a potential source of a long term solution. The exhibit shows the occupations of the 45.7% of area commuters who expressed a willingness to accept less pay to work in the Temecula Valley. Exhibit 10.-Occupations Of Commuters Willing To Work For Less Temecula Valley, 1997 Adminislrative Specialists ~ 11.1% Managef~ & Officials Architect/Engineer/Surveyor ~ 9.0% Misc. ProfessionaFTech/Mgmt. , . Medicine & Health Computer Related Clerical/Secretarial t4.5% Sales-Service ]4.5% Misc. Sales __]4.0% Conslruction~ 14.6% Sour~: The R~our~e Crr~up 129.8% Note that 53 '70, o of this group are professionals, administrators, programmers and technicians (clarA- or red bars). These are the occupational categories in which Southern California has had a shortage of workers. These commuters thus offer Temecula's economic development efforts a potential double edged advantage: 1. Skilled workers 2. Willing to work for less ¢lssue "3. The third economic issue facing Temecu!a emerges ~crn these data: How can the city's highly trained commuter-workers, who are willing to work for a little less to avoid driving long distances, be identified, quantified, and information-about them used to re- cruit employers to the city? 5. Home Sales. One of Temecula's great strengths has been its housing markets. A combina- tion of low prices (by Southern California standards) and a beautiful setting are luring buyers seeking Orange or San Diego County surroundings at much lower cost. Exhibit 11 shows that Temecula's median home price was $167,527 in 2"d quarter 1998. That was $37,473 below the median in San Diego County (-18.3%) and $83,473 below Orange County (-33.2%). Temecula Economic Development Strategy 8 12102/98 Exhibit 11,*Home Price Advantage, Ternecula & So, California Markets Median Preced New & Existing Homes, 2rid Quarter 1998 ! · Me. die All [] Temecul~ Hom~ Pric~ Advantage $167,527 S182,000 $52,473 $251,000 $83,473 $37,473 $14,473 '1 Temecula Los Angeles San Diego Vcnmtt Onmge Source: Dalaquick Record Home Volumes. As a result, the fundamental trend in Temecula's home markets has been "up" since the first quarter of 1991. Exhibit 12 presents "seasonally adjusted" home sales data in the city's zip codes. On this exhibit, each quarter is comparable to the others, as influences like weather have been removed. It shows that even during Southern California's deep housing recession (1991-1996), Temecula's sales have trended upward, except for a small drop when the Federal Reserve Board raised interest rates in 1995. In 1998, there has been a dramatic surge. Exhibit 12.-Total Deed Recordings (seasonally adjusted) City of Temecula, Quarterly, 1988-1998 I .ooo ~; I 800 7°° . lst-gg ht-89 l-! I st-gO /: I lst-91 lst-92 1 st-93 I st-94 1 st-95 I st-96 1 st-97 I st-9S Source: l:)~aquick, ECAP s-J. sonahty In non-seasonally adjusted terms (not shown on the exhibit), Temecula's 2nd quarter 1998 sales figure of 728 smashed its previous all time record of 560 by 30% (2"d quarter 1989). Ternecula Economic Development Strategy 9 12/02/98 Home Prices Rebound. Temecula was not entirely immune to Southern California's housing recession. After reaching a pemk of $189,908 in 1" quartn' 1990, the median price on all city home sales plummeted, and then stabilized at an average median price of $143,392 (late 1992 to late 1997). Since then, however, prices have surged to $167,527, an increase of 16.8% in less than a year. This gain has been more like Orange County than Inland Empire price behavior. $200,000, $190,000 $180,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150.000 $140.000 $130.000 $120.000 $110,000 $100,000' ~ " ~ lst-88 Exhibit 13.-All Home Median ~ City of Temecula, 1988-1998 I st-89 I st-90 I st-91 I st-92 I st-93 I st-94 1 st-95 I st-96 1 st-97 I st-98 Soutry: Dataquick, ECAP seuonality Healthy Home Markets Exacerbate Commuter Problem. The strong growth in Temecula's 1998 home sales means that the city's population growth is picking up speed. A similar trend is evident throughout the balance of the Temecula Valley, where combined 2"d quarter 1998 sales also set a record. While this growth is indicative of a popular and expanding community. it ~!~o means that in I998, the local '-'jobs to worker" gap is expanding at its fastest rate yet. 6. Industrial Real Estate. There is no area of Temecula's economy more critical and con- troversial than the behavior of its industrial real estate market. Critical because this is the type of space that is absorbed by most "basic tier" employers. These are the firms whose success ulti- mately will determine the region's level of local economic activity. Controversial as there are three sources of data for studying this sector and each is derived from a party to the city's Deve!- opment Impact Fee (DIF!: :ussion: commercial brokers, industrial developers. Cit~ Hail. "Basic Tier" Firms & Economic Strategy. In thinking about Temecula's industrial real estate market, it is important to remember how a regional economy operates. Essentially, it is akin to a gold mining town in the Old West. "Basic tier" activities (e.g., the gold mine) sell their products outside the region. When they pay workers or buy supplies and services, they inject dollars into the local economy that otherwise would not reach it. These funds then circulate through the economy's "secondary tier" (e.g., ge.eral store or saloon) creating added jobs and income. Take away the gold mine, and the general store and saloon die. Take away one of Temecula's "basic tier" firms, and local retailers, restaurants and consumer service firms are hurt. In Temecula, the "basic tier" has four components: Temecula Economic Development Strategy 10 12/02/98 1. Manufacturers like Opto-22, International Rectifier, Guidant, Chanttell Commercial or Magnecomp sell nationally and internationally and occupy industrial space. 2. Service rims like Municipal Financial Services assist clients throughout the nation and occupy either industrial/commercial space. Both these types of companies can locate anywhere. Their customers are external to Temecula. Every dollar they spend locally is a dollar that would not otherwise circulate within the area. In Temecula, the average pay level for these operations is quite high. Their growth will likely de- termine the long term health of the area's economy. 3. Tourist venues like Pechanga Indian gaming, the area's 13 wineries, the Balloon & Wine Festival, Old Town and the Temecula Creek Inn draw outsiders to the area. When tourists, visitors, conventioneers or film crews are drawn to Temecula, the money they in- ject into the Temecula economy is also money that would not otherwise circulate through the area. The uniqueness of Temecula's venues, and the success of the Chamber of Commerce, Pechanga Indian Tribe and City Hall in promoting them will allow these activities to add to the area's economic health. However, the types of jobs and the pay scales associated with this sector are not the building blocks required for creating a fundamentally strong economy. 4. Commuters drive away, earn money and bring much of it home to spend. Today, commuters are the principal source of"basic tier" money being injected into the Temecula economy. While commuter income has created a very prosperous "secondary tier" of retail shops and consumer service activities in the city, reliance on them comes at a high cost to local families and the transportation infrastructure. Secondary Tier Firms. When considering economic strategy at the city level, there is a tendency to think of success as the luring of major national retailers. Such operations are important as they add sales tax revenue to the local government budget and expand the shopping alternatives of lo- cal households. However, though firms like Home Depot, Robinson-May or Walmart are nation- ally owned, they are not part of a community's %asic tier". Like the general stores in the western .~old mining town, they can only succeed if "basic tier" firms, commuters or visitors inject grow- ing levels of new money into the community. ,/'Issue #4. If the main priority of Temecula's economic policy is to broaden "basic tier" em- ployment to reduce the dependency of residents on commuter jobs, then the concentration should be on the expansion of manufacturers and service companies that occupy industrial/commercial space. If the main priority is to solidify the City Hall revenue base, the emphasis should be on re- cruiting "secondarc tier" sales tax generators like national retailers or automotive dealerships. Industrial Real Estate Data. When studying a community's industrial real estate market, an economist typically looks at four measures: 1. Inventory of total industrial space. 2. Absorption rate at which space is being taken by new occupants. 3. Square footage that is either vacant or occupied but about to be vacant. 4. Lease rate per square foot compared to competitive markets. Temecula Economic Development Strategy '11 12/02/98 The sources of this tonnation are traditionally fwms like Grubb & Ellis, BKE or Lee & Associ- ates that track this information to assist their work. Economists can supplement this data by go- ing to the development community or checking with the business license or pertaining offices at City Hall. However, given the intensity of the DIF debate in Temecula, questions have been raised as to the reliability and interpretation of the available industrial real estate data. This is the case as virtually every source of information is a party to the discussion. As the price and availability of industrial real estate is one of the main factors that determines whether "basic tier" firms will locate in an area, any analysis of Temecula's long term economic prospects will not be credible unless a consensus can be achieved about data on this subject. v'Issue #5. Temecula would appear to need an independent derivation of the four sets of industrial real estate data outlined above. Without it, any assessment of the city's competitive position for "basic tier" industries will be suspect. With it, the discussion of economic policy can move from questions of fact to questions of community priorities. Industrial Real Estate Price. That said, ECAP has found a source of industrial real estate price information that is outside of Temecula. This is the price data published for national distribution by the San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles County offices of Grubb & Ellis (January 1998), and the Inland Empire price data published by the Ontario office of Grubb & Ellis (June 1998). These data are presented in Exhibit 14. On the average, the $0.37 asking lease price in Temecula was equal to that of Central Los Ange- les County, and less expensive than that of every other sub-market of Southern California's coastal counties. Temecula's price was $0.06 per foot per month below the next most expensive sub-markets: San Gabriel Valley, Western and North Orange County. However, Temecula's average lease price was the most expensive in the Inland Empire market place. It was $0.04 per foot per month more above the prices in Upland, Montelair and Chino~ $0.05 more expensive than Corona~ and $0.06 more expensive than Ontario, Mira Loma, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontaria, San Bernardino and Redlands. in. : - /%~!:~ !~:;.;~, ~;-;:ii_,~,:~.~,.?'Exhibit 14.4n~at'Real"Estate Data' : , ::~!,.,~:. ~/!. : ~ .. ~':~ ~.~:!%:. I: ::. :~ ~ ' '* Inland Empire & Nohh San Diego County, 1998 I Area Monthly Price Per Foot~ Area Monthly Price Per Foot~ So. Orange County $0.62 Mid-City Los Angeles Co. $0.37 Vista $0.58 Montelair/Upland $0.33 San Marcos $0.54 Chino $0.33 Escortdido $0.54 Corona $0.32 Orange County Airport $0.54 Ontario/Mira Loma $0.31 Central Orange County $0.46 Fontaria $0.31 W. Orange County $0.43 RedlanddSan Bdno $0.31 No. orange County $0.43 Central L.A. Co. $0.30 San Gabriel Valley $0.43 Colton/Rialto $0.29 South Bay $0.40 Pems/Moreno Valley $0.28 Temecula : "' $0.37 :'- Riverside $0.28 ~San Diego, Orange & Los Angeles County data for January Source: Grubb & Ellis, San Diego & Ontario offices 1998. Inland Empire data for June 1998. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 12 12/02/98 It should be noted that a single average price provides only a general understanding of market pricing. It makes no allowance for differences in the age or quality of the buildings being priced. Thus, a $0.37 price for Temecula's new 30-foot industrial buildings with modern fire flow equip- ment is a bargain compared to the same price for aging structures in Central Los Angeles County. Also, an average price says nothing about the prices of various product segments. This is impor- tant as it does not reveal the relative prices of space needed by the medium-sized firms for which Temecula is most likely to be competitive. That said, the fact that on average, Temecula industrial space is the highest priced in the Inland Empire sub-market is not good, particularly since lease price is often the first variable reviewed by firms in the location process. Companies considering moving inland from expensive San Diego County, save money on leases but must contend with longer distances and transporting goods and supplies over the mountains. Existing firms coming from Los Angeles or Orange Counties, and new ones wanting to serve those huge markets, can find less expensive space in places like Co- rona and Chino as well as shorter distances. 7. Cost Of Distance. The key point in discussions of Temeeula's economy is often the cost of its longer distances. This depends on the mileage disadvantage versus competitor cities, and the type and weight of vehicles and goods being moved. The five nearest competitive situations are: · Chino (Los AngelesMarket): 47 miles to Chino on the way to L.A. County. · San Marcos (San Diego Market): 41.7 miles calculated as the 33.3 miles to San Mar- cos less the 5.5 miles back to the 1-15 = 27.8 miles plus 50% added for cost & time crossing mountains loaded. Also, 34.75 miles for return trips calculated as 27.8 miles plus 25% added when unloaded. 27.8 miles used without weighting for auto travel. · Corona (Orange Co. Market): 36 miles to Corona on the way to Orange County. · Riverside (Los Angeles Market): 34 miles to Riverside on the way to L.A. County · Riverside (Orange Co. Market): 22 miles. This is the 36 miles to Corona on the way to Orange County versus the 14 miles from Riverside to Corona. Exhibit 15 estimates the costs of these distances using various shipping scenarios for goods, and driving costs for professionals. Four situations are considered: 1. Double axle tractor & trailer. An industrial or distribution firm ships merchandise or receives supplies using this vehicle with a tare weight (unloaded) of 10.5 tons (Ryder). An average cargo load of 17.5 tons is assumed. The 35.5 ton total weight is 89% of capacity (Ryder average load). This weight is assumed to move at $0.27 per mile (Dept. qf Transportation). Sb~ipTing is programmed to occur 5 days week, 52 weeks per year, twice a day. On return trips, the tractor & trailer are assumed to be empty. Single axle tractor & trailer. An industrial or distribution firm ships goods or re- ceives supplies using this vehicle with a tare weight of 13.5 tons (Ryder). An average cargo load of 22.0 tons is assumed. The 28.0 ton total weight is 86% of capacity (Ry- der average load). This weight is assumed to move at $0.27 per mile (DOI). Ship- ping is programmed to occur 5 days week, 52 weeks per year, twice a day. On return trips, the tractor & trailer are empty. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 13 12/02/98 24-foot truck. An industrial or distribution firm ships goods or receives supplies us- ing this vehicle with a tare weight of 6.5 tons (Ryder). An average cargo load of 4.5 tons is assumed. The 11.0 ton total weight is 100% of capacity (Ryder average load). Exhibit 15.-Shipping Costs From Temecula Vs. Competitive Cities, 1998 I Tons Capacity, Mileage Tractor/Cab Weight Empty Trailer Tons Of Cargo ( 1 ) Truck & Cargo Weight Cost Per Ton Mile (2) Daily Cost Per Vehicle O) Days per week x 52 Weeks per Year Annual cost: one vehicle per day one mile Taps Per Day' One Mile Annual Cost Chino 47.00 San Maros (4 & 6) 41.70 Corona 36.00 Riverside (L.A. Market) 34.00 Riverside ( OR Market) 22.00 Truck Weight: Empty Tons Of Cargo Truck Weight Cost Per Ton Mile Daily Cost Per Vehicle Days per week x 52 Weeks per Year Annual cost: one vehicle per day Trips Per Da~ One Mile Annual Cost Chino 47.00 San Marcos (5 & 6) 34.75 Corona 36.00 Riverside (L.A. Market) 34.00 Riverside (OR Market) 22.00 C,vuno (L..4. 3. tarket) San Marcos (San D~ego Market). Corona (L.A. Market) Riverside ( L.A. Market) Riverside (OR Market) 1 )Typical Loads From Ryder IDouble Axle Single Axle I 24 Foot-Truck I Automobile 44.0 32,5 11.0 Outbound 10.5 7.5 6.5 3.0 3.0 22.0 17.5 4.5 35.5 28.0 11.0 $0.270 $0.270 $0.270 $9.59 $7.56 $2.97 $1.315 260 260 260 156 $2,492 $1,966 $772 $205 2 2 2 1 $4,984 $3,931 $1,544 $205 $234,257 $184,766 $72,587 $9.642 $207,841 $163,931 $64,401 $5,703 $179.431 $141.523 $55.598 $7.385 $169,463 $133,661 $52,510 $6,975 $109,652 $86.486 $33,977 $4,513 Return 13.5 10.5 65 0 0 0 13.5 10.5 6.5 $0.270 $0.270 $0.270 $3.65 $2.84 $1.76 $1.315 260 260 260 156 $948 $737 $486 $205 2 2 2 1 $1,895 $1,474 $913 $205 $89,084 $69,287 $42,892 $9,642 $65,865 $51,228 $31.713 $5,703 $68,234 $53,071 $ 32,854 $7,385 $64.444 $50,123 $31,028 $6,975 $41,699 $32.432 $20,077 $4,513 Total Annual Cost ~ $223,341 ~ $254.054 t $115 479 $!-0.283 ! $273.706 $215,159 596,114 $11,406 $247,666 $194,594 $88,452 $14,770 $233,906 $183.784 $83,538 $13,950 $151.351 $118,919 $54,054 $9,026 (2)National Average from U.S. Dept of Transportation (3)Auto cost $0.375 from IRS + $75 per hour/75 miles per hour = $I per mile for time (4)San Marcos distance weighted for going over mountains: 25 miles x 1.50 (5)San Marcos distance weighted for going over mountains: 25 miles x 1.25 (6)San Marcos distance asstamed at 27.8 miles with no weighting for automobile ravel. Sources: U.S. Department of Transportation, Ryder Trucks, Internet Site Temecula Economic Development Strategy 14 12/02/98 This weight is assumed to move at a cost of $0.27 per mile (DOT). Shipping is pro- gramreed to occur S days week, 52 weeks per year, twice a day. On re{urn trips, the tractor & trailer are assumed to be empty. 4. One automobile. The IRS allowance of $0.3 15 per mile for vehicle cost is assumed. The professional is assumed to make $75 per hour and drive at 75 miles per hour, or at a cost of $1.00 per mile. The $1.315 cost is assumed to occur 3 days per week, 52 weeks per year, with one round trip per day. Under these assumptions, firms located in Temeeula incur annual higher transportation costs than competitor cities as follows: · Chino (Los Angeles Market): $115,000-$323,000 for shipping, and $19,300 for pro- fessionals. · San Marcos (San Diego Market): $96,000-$274,000 for shipping, and $11,400 for professionals. · Corona (Orange Co. Market): $88,000-$248,000 for shipping, and $14,800 for pro- fessionals. · Riverside (Los Angeles Market): $84,000-$234,000 for shipping, and $13,950 for professionals. · Riverside (Orange Co. Market): $54,000-$151,000 for shipping, and $9,000 for pro- fessionals. There is nothing that can be done about the distance between Temecula and the Orange, San Di- ego and Los Angeles County markets that "basic tier" Southern California rirms must serve. When the city asks companies to migrate to the community, it relies heavily on the beauty of its setting and the quality of its life style and schools. In considering these appeals, entrepreneurs, managers and professionals must make transportation cost calculations like these. Some will find that the aesthetic environment is worth the added expense. However, recent history. has shown ?.2z the new "basic. tier" jobs they create, plus the seconda~' tier jobs they induce, have been in- sufficient to meet the needs of a rapidly growing population. For this reason, it is important that the city find ways of overcoming its transportation cost disadvantage by reducing other costs of doing business within its borders. These considerations lend weight to the previously mentioned importance for Temecula to find a way to use its commuter labor force as a location advantage. They also draw attention to the importance of government policy: ,/'Issue//6. To the extent that the City of Temecula's policies work to lower the costs of con- duc::n; b!~siness in the zity, they w-ill serve to make it more likely that "basic tier" industria! firms will migrate to it. To the extent that city policy works to raise these costs, they will serve to make such migrations less likely. 8. Brine line. In the long run, Temecula would seem to be well suited for the location for so- phisticated manufacturers of light weight products such as those associated with the computer industry. Already, its beautiful setting and high quality labor force have combined to lure Interna- tional Rectifier, a maker of process control computer chips. Industries like this are willing to pay a little more to be located in an upstale environment. The computer industry, in particular, is now expanding outside of the Silicon Valley due to its lack of space and very high costs of operation. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 15 12/02/98 However, many manufacturing operations, including those in the computer chip business, produce salt water brine as a side effect of their processes. This effluent cannot be discharged onto the ground or into riverbeds as it would pollute underground water supplies. The solution is to trans- port it to the sea. In the Inland Empire, the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SAR/) serves this purpose. It is a pipeline connecting firms in cities like San Bernardino, Riverside, Ontario, Chino and Corona to the Pacific Ocean. In fact, at considerable cost, International Recti~er transports its brine to one of these communities where it is discharged into this line. In the long run, Teme- cula must have brine line capability if it is to be competitive for certain firms of this type. Recently, the Eastern Municipal Water District (Mll/'D) completed a segment of a 30 inch brine line from Sun City, down Railroad Canyon Road, along the I-15 fleeway to Lake Elsinore. It was built in conjunction with a separate pipeline being constructed to move reclaimed water from the Sun City Regional Water Reclamation Facility to the Temescal Wash. Meanwhile, the Santa Aria Watershed Project Authority (SA WPA) has completed the EIR and awarded design contracts for the completion of this conduit to the SARI line west of Corona. Completion is anticipated for late 2000. This 14 mile reach is expected to cost $23.5 million. Funding has come from the sale of capacity rights to the districts that make up SAWPA (including Eastern MWD). It is 14 miles from Rancho California Rd. in Temecula to the new brine line at Railroad Canyon Road. It is not unreasonable to estimate the cost of spanning this distance at about $23.5 million. ,"Issue #7. To increase its competitiveness, Temecula should engage Murrieta and area wa- ter districts in discussions of how to fund and build such a $23.5 million brine line. 9. Water & Sewage Hook-Up Fees. Because Southern California is largely a coastal des- ert, water has always been a key factor in its development. Sewage capacity has become a mod- em issue as much of the region's water is in underground basins. Residential Water. Rancho California Water District handles most of Temecula's water. The district charges $4,580 for residential water service. This includes $1,397 for water capacity, $2,683 for meter & service, and $500 for the main water line. Exhibit 16 shows that this is above the rate for Eastern MWD (S3, 760) but below those of nearby water jurisdictions. ' Exhibit 1'6.-Residential Water HOOk Up Charges, TemeCulaArea, 1998 ] Water R. Calif. Eastern Riverside San Diego Elsinore Water MWD City City MWD Water Capacity $1,397 $1,330 $2,110 $4,016 $3,680 FLre Flow $0 $180 $0 $0 $0 Water Line $500 $1,350 $3,225 $1,500 $200 Meter &Service $2.683 $900 $1.010 $1.260 $72{5 i%ta! ~ ater C~st : $4.580 $3.750 56.3:;5 S6,77~ $4.606 Source: Eastern Mumcipal Water District and Rancho Califorma Water District Western MWD $3,048 $0 $1,350 $595 Residential Sewer. Eastern MWD provides sewer service to Temecula except in the northwest- ern commercial zone. There, the Rancho Califomia's Santa Rosa zone handles it. Exhibit 17 (next page) shows that Eastern MWD charges $4,970 for residential sewage hook-up, including $3,845 for sewer capacity and $1,125 for the main sewer line ($15 per foot, assuming 75feet of proper(y). Rancho Caiifornia's residential sewer capacity fee is $3,724. Adding about $500 for the main line, brings the rate to $4,224. These fees are above those of San Diego City Water ($3, 625) and Elsinore Valley MWD ($3, 900) and below those for the City of Riverside ($5, 572). Temecula Economic Development Strategy 16 12/02/98 Exhibit 17.-Residential Sewer Hook Up Charges, Temecula Area, 1998 Sewer R. Callf. Eastern Riverside San Diego Elsinore Western Water MWD City City MWD MWD Sewer Capacity $3,724 : $3,845 $2,684 $2,500 $3,700 NA Sewer Line $500 :" :~ :' ! $1,125$2,888 $1,125 $200 NA Total Sewer Cost $4,224 ": $4,970; $5,572 $3,625 $3,900 NA Source: Eastern Mumcipal Water District and Rancho California Water District Industrial Water Capacity. The Rancho California Water District handles most of Temecula's water service. Its water hook-up fees are based on a building's water. meter size..The district in- dicates that a 100,000 foot facility usually takes a 2-inch meter (160 gallrain or 76,800 m 8 hours of constant flow). This capacity would cost $7,481, except in the Santa Rosa area (west of Diaz Road, north of Rio Nedo) where it is $10,910. if lateral lines must be built, $2,050 is added to these costs. Including laterals, fire flow inspection adds $3,600. The respective water service costs are thus $13,231 and $16,560. By contrast, in the Eastern M'WD area, (e.g., Moreno Valley, Hemet, a little of Temecula) water fees are based on water usage. A 100,000 foot facility using 10,500 gallons per day would be the equivalent of 23.9 homes (Equivalent Dwelling Unit = 440 gallday). The fee per EDU is $1,330, the total would be $31,818. Eastern's fire flow EDU is 1,000 gal/min. for a 1,500 foot home at $180. An industrial facility needs 3,000 gal/rrdn or 3.0 EDU, and a 100,000 foot facility is 66.7 times the 1,500 foot home. Fire flow would thus cost for 3.0 x 66.7 x $180 or $36,000. Inspection and plan check would add $8,090 for a total of $75,908. Temecula would appear to have a considerable cost advantage in those industrial areas served by the Rancho California Water District. Industrial Sewer Capacity. As indicated, Eastern MWD handles most sewer service in Teme- cu',a jL,, bases its sewer capacity fees on usage. Assuming sewer usage of2,5O0 gaL'day (100,000 foot building, 950feet per employee = 105 workers x 25 gallons each). One EDU is 235 gal/day at $3,845. The industrial building fee would be 11.2 EDU or $43,057. Inspections and plan check would add $3,910 for a total of $46,967. In Rancho California Water District's Santa Rosa area, sewer capacity fees are also based on us- age. Their standard is a 1,000 square foot site at $3,724. The district creates usage factors for different types of building functions. Dry manufacturing, for instance, has a factor of 0. 13. The 100.000 foot building is !00 times the !.000 f'oot EDU ~:anciard. For '-h~s use. $3.724 x 0.!3 x 100 yields a fee of $48,411. Inspections and plan check would add $1,500 for a total of $49,91:z. Costs between the areas served by the Eastern MWD and Rancho California appear to be roughly the same. ~lssue/t8. Water and sewer fees are expensive and complex.. While aimed at solving infra- structure problems for water agencies, they have a strong impact on a community's competitive- ness. It is an area of economic policy in which the interest of the public at large would be well served by continuous discussions, information exchanges and brain storming among professionals from local cities and water agencies about how to mitigate their high costs. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 17 12/02/98 ,/'Issue #9. Both the Eastern MWD and the Rancho California Water District are willing to assist developers in spreading the cost of their fees over time. The former charges 10%, the latter charges the prime rate. As both agencies use tax exempt funds, and can investment surpluses with the CA Local Agency Investment Fund, these rates appear to be in excess of their costs of capital. Can they be convinced to lower their rates to one of these truer cost of capital in order to somewhat lower the cost of doing business in Temecula? 10. Personal Income. Temecula is one of Riverside County's most prosperous communities. Exhibit 18 shows that the city's median family income in 1997 was $56,946. This was the 5t~ highest among Pdverside County's twenty-four cities. Altogether, city residents had a total per- sonal income of $1.1 billion, the sixth highest in the county. These data are reflective of the high educational and skill levels of the population. Indirectly, they speak to the major location advan- tage of the community ... its highly trained labor force. Exhibit 18.-Median Family & Total Personal Income Cities In Riverside County, 1997 City Median Family Total (000) City Indian Wells $130,297 $317,918 LakeElsinore Canyon Lake $69,528 $349,619 Calimcsa Norco $67,629 $480,398 P~ris Rancho Mirage $58,141 $635,505 Palm Springs Temecula $56,946 $1,078,264 Lndio Corona $56,126 $2,323,763 Coachella Moreno Valley. $54,623 $2,524,270 Biythe La Qumta $51,196 $750,401 Barruing PaLm Desert $48,784 $1,243,867 Beaumont RAverside $44,995 $4,838,867 San 3acinto Mumeta $43,626 $813,651 Desert Hot Spr. Cathedral CXrv $40,305 $654,525 Hornet Sourc. c U S. Census, EC.~P Calculations Median Family $40,059 $38 124 $37 464 $36 412 $34 141 $30 747 $30509 $30 209 $29 694 $27.650 $27558 $27,278 Total (000) $323,825 $153,052 $410,466 $1,155,016 $544,268 $171 475 $192 808 $372 980 $148 140 $314 135 $233 406 $955 283 These enviable income levels, combined with the higher incomes found in Mumeta and the sur- rounding unincorporated region, create a strong base for taxable trade. Here, the City of Teme- cula is in an excellent position both because it has recently been capturing much of the Temecula Valley' s retail activity, and because the soon to be opened Promenade Mall will enhance the city's strong position. 11, Taxable Retail Trade, Despite the ups and downs of the Southern California economy, Tem.~c~::,z's :.,.-,:z:.!~ re~aii sales have se: records m every year of fi-,.~ ::?,-'~ e,-dstence. E.~:bdbit !9 tnext page) shows that in 1997, sales reached $83 1.2 million, 94.6% above the city's 1991 level. Temecula's sales tax growth has also continuously exceeded that of Riverside County. In 1997, Riverside County sales were up 7.5%, Temecula's sales were up 10.4%. In 1998, Temecula had the 17a' largest population in the Inland Empire (46,550). However, its taxable sales ($831.2 million) were the sixth highest in the region behind #5 Rancho Cucamonga ($907. 6 million) and ahead of#7 Palm Desert ($82&5 million). This was accomplished despite the lack of a regional mall (data not displayed). Temecula Economic Development Strategy 18 12/02/98 $427,207 $512,968 Exhibit 19.-Total Taxable Sales (000) City of Ternecula, 1991-1997 $535,735 ~52.7~ 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Soma: CA Board ofEqualinlion 1996 1997 Per Capita Retail Sales. Given the importance of the retail sales tax to municipal finance, per capita retail sales is a major index of a community's ability to deliver services to its citizens. Te- mecula is fortunate to have its retail trade per capita at the very high $18,407 level (Exhibit 20). This puts it ahead of the per capita trade in every Inland Empire with over 100,000 people, in- cluding Ontario with its giant Ontario Mills Mall ($15,950). The city's per capita trade is more than double the Riverside County average ($8,424). The per capita figure will increase further in 1998. In 1999, it will accelerate with the opening of the Promenade Mall. Exhibit 20.-Taxable Sales Per Capita, 1997 Inland m,l:X4g_.Cities, 100,000 Or Mm~ore , ,,~._ ~ .,~ ' . ~-. ~ & :~/, ~ ~ , $18,407 $15,950 $10,930 $I0,059 $9,538 $7.755 $6,802 $4,432 Tnn~ula Oalm'io Corona S B~'nardino Rivgnido P,, Cue, amenga Fontaria I Som'ce: CA Board of Equalization Mor~ao Vly Temecula Economic Development StratelD~ 19 12/02/98 It is interesting that Temecula has achieved this level of retail growth in the absence of a strong "basic tier" job base. This has occurred largely because of the extraordinary number of high in- come commuters who leave the city and return with their pay checks. NOTE: To the extent that Temecula's city policy wishes to see the city's revenues stabi- lized and growing, they have succeeded overwhelming in the retail arena. If this were the exclusive goal of city economic policy, there would be no need for change. 12. Traffic. Temecula's rapid population, retail and job growth has exacted a price from the city's traffic circulation system. This is particularly the case for east-west traffic over the I-15 freeway at Winchester Road and Rancho California Road, and under it at Route 79 South in the Pala Road area. In addition, due to the large number of commuters from the city, the on-ramps to the I-15 are heavily congested in the mornings, and the off-ramps at night. Temecula is investing heavily in new road capacity to ease these traffic flows. Exhibit 21 lists the improvements either just completed or underway along each portion of the I-15 freeway. When these projects are completed in 2000, they will greatly relieve the current congestion. 1-15 at Winchester Road. Traffic flow across the 1-15 is being eased by a wider overpass, and the elimination of the left turn for vehicles going from Temecula's industrial area to the north- bound I-15. A new off-ramp lane will help vehicles exiting the I-15 when coming from Murrieta or Riverside. Traffic in the city's eastern half will be able to avoid the 1-15 by going south on Margarita Road's new lanes, from Winchester to Solana Road. And, the new Overland Drive overpass connecting Jefferson Avenue to Margarita Road will let many drivers avoid Winchester altogether. The new Overland Drive, plus improvements on Winchester, Margarita and Ynez Roads should ameliorate traffic flows associated with the new Promenade Mall. 6 7 8 10 il 12 13 Exhibit 21 .-Road Construction To Ease Ternecula's Traffic Delays Project Description ~ Purpose 1-15 at Winchester Road Widen overpass by 2 lanes Easterly ncrd~bound loop onto I-15 Add lane for southbound I-15 off-ramp Street unprovements around Promenade Mall Expand Margarita Rd. south to Solana Way Increase traffic across 1-15 End left turn across Winchester Rd.. ease traffic ~o~' Stop traffic backup onto freeway, ease left turn Ease lraffic flow on Winchester Rd. Ease southerly traffic movement, keep offof the I-15 1-15 at Rancho Cali'ornia Road Widen overpass by 3 lanes Easterly northbound loop onto I-15 Add lane for southbound I-15 off-ramp Expand inez Rd. south ofR. Cai~ion,,xa Rd.. Overland overpass on 1-15, Jefferson to ~/~rgarita Increase traffic across 1-15 End left tom across R. California Rd., ease traffic flow Stop traffic backup onto freeway, faster left turn Ease sLyhal congestion at Rancho Califorma Rd. Relieve traffic on R, California Rd. & Winchester Rd. 1-15 at Route 79 South 71~la Ro,ul,,,eO) Expand lanes under 1-15, signalize Increase traffic under 1-15 Widen Rt. 79 from I-15 to M~garita to 6-1enes Complete widening, ease tra~c flow New Pain Road bridge & widen road to 4-lanes Increas~ tra~c flow to homes & Pechanga Reservation Other ~ Circ orion Coordinate 28 signals, traffic cameras Smooth traffic flows over the entire system Some: City of Temecula Temecula Economic Development Strategy 20 12/02/98 1-15 at Rancho California Road. Traffic flow across the 1-15 is also being eased by a wider overpass, the elimination of the left turn for vehicles coming from the city's industrial area, and an additional southbound off-ramp lane. The widening of Margarita Road and the new Overland Drive overpass will also keep many drivers away from Rancho California Road. Improvements on Ynez Road will speed the signal at Rancho California Road. l-IS at Route 79 South & Pain Road. Added lanes and signals will ease traffc moving under the l- 15. From there, along Route 79 to Margarita Road, the route will be expanded to six lanes. Those heading south across Temecula Creek will soon find a new bridge and a four lane road that will serve local neighborhoods and the Pechanga Indian Reservation. Other Improvements. Finally, to ease traffic flows throughout the city, twenty-eight of the city' s signals are being coordinated, and cameras added to allow monitoring of traffic flows. While these improvements will help Temecula's traffic, the constant pressure from rapid growth will keep road improvements at the top of the local agenda. There are three issues: v/Issue #10. Temecula was incorporated after the passage of Measure A which added ½ % to Riverside County's sales tax to build a menu of highway projects and regional arterials. Though the city benefits from its local share of revenue from this measure, its long range needs for re- gional transportation improvements were not part of the program. As Riverside County lenders look forward to extending Measure A, Temecula's leaders must identify projects to be in- cluded in any future Measure A list of priority projects. These needs might include such projects as off and on ramps and a wider overpass at Santiago Road, similar facilities at Cherry Street~ and a widening of Route 79 to the Eastside Reservoir. The list might be extended to in- clude development of a route from the proposed Overland Drive overpass, across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road (perhaps on Via Montezutna) so local commuter traffic can be kept away from the Winchester Road and Rancho California Road interchanges. v/Issue #I 1. The Cities of Temeeula and Murrieta need to reach an agreement for the link- age of Diaz Road and Washington Avenue. This north-south corridor would provide an alter- native tc~ the I-15 for vehicles wishing to move be~'een the two cities. In this respect. it woul-~ piay the same role in reducing traffic in me west as the expansion of Margarita Road will play in eastern Temecula. As the employment base in western Temecula is largely made of "basic", non- sales tax generating firms, Murrieta merchants and city revenues benefit from them to the extent that commuters from that city earn pay checks in these firms but spend the money near their homes. The easier the commute between the two communities, the more likely this is to happen. 13. Other Issues. Temecula has three issues that must be addressed by its economic strategy, beyond those that jump out of the economic data. A. Eastside Reservoir & Tourism. This report has not concentrated on tourism, despite its role in Temecula's economic base. This decision was made for the simple reason that it is an area of city policy already receiving ample attention. The work of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Chamber of Commerce, the Pechanga Indian Tribe, the Balloon & Wine Festival and the area's wineries have already made the community a successful tourism destination. Old Town clearly offers unrealized potential. However, this is well documented and the subject of numerous spe- cific studies. The one aspect of tourism that does not appear to have received significant city attention is the Eastside Reservoir. The Southern California Metropolitan Water District has decided not to have Temecula Economic Development Strau:gy 21 12/02/98 boat body contact (water and jet skiing) at this huge n~w facility, located on Winchester Road north of Temccula. However, the district is planning a veq extensive destination resort complex for the site. This complex anticipates 2.0 million tourist visitors by 2004, growing to 3.5 million per year in 2010 and afterward. ~'Issue #12. Temeeula's tourist economy will be positively impacted by developments at the Eastside Reservoir. Its traffic flow will be negatively impacted. For these reasons, it is important the city leaders closely monitor the planning occurring at the site. B. Organization of Economic Development. In Temeeula, economic activities are primarily divided among three organizations: · Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation is in pan funded by the city with the purpose of conducting visits with existing companies (retention), undertaking site tours for prospective new companies and location agents (attraction), assisting in the follow-up on business leads (attraction), assisting in the compilation of data for prospective companies (at- traction), and assisting in preparing for and staffing of trade shows (attraction). · Temecula Chamber of Commerce is in part funded by the city to respond to tourism inquiries (tourism), prepare visitor and event calendars (tourism, community life), conduct farm tours (tourism), coordinate with the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival (tourism) and the Pechanga Entertainment Center (tourism), plus receive and respond to inquires from business interested in locating in the area (attraction). The Chamber also encourages local firms to shop locally (seco~_dnry tier expansion). · City of Temecula. As with most communities, economic strategy is largely coordinated by city staff. This includes managing marketing and public relations efforts to attract firms to the city, staffing trade shows, responding to leads, coordinating "fast track" permitting, keeping data on the existing economy, maintaining rapport with the commercial real estate community, and coordinating with groups with specialized economic interests such as: the Inland Empire Economic Partnership, the Temecula Valley EDC, the Temecula Chamber of Commerce, the Temecula Valley Film Comanission. and the Old Town Main Street Association. ~'Issue #13. Should there be changes in the structure of Temecula's economic development effort? C. Industry Targets. In light of the need to expand Temecula's economic base, it is important to ascertain what sectors of the economy are most likely to respond to efforts to recruit firms within them. One way of determining this is to track the "basic fief' sectors that have already been growing the fastest. Sectors showing the strongest employment growtk payroll growth, average pay levels. and _m-owth in numbers of fi,,"ms are the ones in which firms are most likely To respond to efforts to market the city's location advantages. It is in these sectors, after all, that firms have already found Temecula to be a desirable and profitable location. Exhibits 22-29 below show the top ten Temecula sectors based upon each of eight separate growth and payroll criteria. The sectors were created by reviewing the 1991 and 1996 databases of Temecula firms owned by the city, and dividing the firms within each year into 95 sectors. These groupings were then separated into "basic" and "secondary" sectors. Growth rates were created for the "basic sectors" and rankings made. In each case, the table shows the 1996 levels of firms, jobs, payroll and average pay in the sector. fithe ranking is based on a growth criteria, a fifth column is added with that information. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 99 12/02/98 The sectors that occur repeatedly within these eight tables provide a strong hint as to the city's best company recruiting targets. In the "issues & recommendations" section of this report, a weighted scale is used to ascertain which ten sectors are most likely the city's best bets for going after new firms. NOTE: For each exhibit, the source of the data is the California Employment Development De- partment. Firms were consolidated into sectors by ECAP for two reasons. First, to create logi- cal combinations of firms where Standard Industrial Classification codes were insufficient. Sec- ond, to prevent disclosure of confidential information under EDD rules requiring a minimum of three firms in any one sector and no one firm to represent more than 80% of the jobs or payroll being disclosed in the sector. 10 Fastest Growing Sectors Mfg: Electronic equipment Mfg: Printing & publishing Basic Service: Wholesale Medical Mfg: Industrial machinery Mfg: Primary & Fabricated metals Mfg: Plastic, Chemical, Bio Products Exhibit 22.-Largest Job Growth, Temecula 1991-1996 Firms Jobs 13 1,530 18 462 7 525 21 436 14 332 11 318 10 Highest of 38 Basic Sectors Payroll Avg. Pay . 3obsglJ)6 $14,295,350 $37,382 "1,248 3,869,189 33,475 .- - 307 3,691,597 28,144 ' 285 3.740,587 34,344 .... '197 2,898.495 34,922 .... ~115 1,913,844 24,048 175 Construction: general contractors-non-residential bldgs Agriculture: Farm management & Labor services Mfg: Instruments and related Construction: Other Specialty Contractors 16 167 1,636,976 39,287 153 8 491 2,009.154 16,368 131 10 1,504 13,295,100 35,351 129 21 116 826,859 28,431 93 1991-1996. Exhibit 22 shows the ten "basic" sectors with the highest number of jobs created from Manufacturers are important but, by 1996, construction was regaining its stature. The city's strength in sectors requiring a highly skilled manufacturing labor force is evident in the prevalence of sectors handling electronic, medical, machinery, chemical and instrumentation products. ~i:., ~.;:.;-,;.,;;:::~.ihit~,~ .qrOp~..~aymli G.,rOwffi, ~:1~~::~:38 Temecula 1991-1996 10 Fastest Growing Sectors Firms Jobs Mfg: Electronic equipment 13 1,530 Mfg: Instruments and related 10 1,504 Mfg: Prmttng& publishing 18 462 Mfg: Primary. &Fabricated metals 14 332 Basic Service: Wholesale Medical 7 525 .~,f,-o Lndus~nal 21 ,~- macban~m 435 ConsLruchon: Senera] contractors-non-residential b|dgs 16 167 Agriculture: Farm management & Labor s~rvjces 8 491 Basic Sin-vice: Wholesale Electronics 12 96 Construction: Other Specialty Contractors 21 116 Exhibit 23 shows which ten "basic" sectors had the highest total With the exception of wholesale electronics replacing chemical firms are the same as in Exhibit 22, though in different order. Payroll Avg. Pay Payroll 91-96 $14,295,350 $37,382 $12,!.09,547 13,295, 1 O0 35, 351 3,183,073 3,869, 189 33,475 3,072,747 2,898,495 34,922 ,:;,:'2,129,409 3,691,597 28,144 ' :. ,1,056,020 3.7,~0 587 34,34,~ 1.587.475 1,636,976 39,287 1,529,273 -2,009,154 16,368 '.'l~0.35~.453' 1,172, 871 48,870 997,601. 826,859 28,431 ' 'm,238 payroll creation from 1991 - 1996. and biological manufacturing, the Temecula Economic Development Strategy 23 12/02/98 Exhibit 24.-Highest Employment Level, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula 1996 10 Highest Sectors Firms ~,~.,:~.~...~';::~ Payroll Av[ Pay Mfg: Electronic equipment 13 F~!~.~:._; ~ $14,295,350 $37,382 Mfg: Instnmxents and related 10 ~,~i 13,295,100 35,351 Basic Service: Wholesale Medical 7 .~:,,~ .~.:.~ 3,691,597 28,144 Agriculture: Fana management & Labor services 8 ....... ....' ,~' 2.009, 154 16,368 Mfg: Printing & publishing 18 ~ .... ~-~ !-~462: 3,869.189 33,475 Mfg: Industrial machinery 21 ~,~G~!: 3,740,587 34,344 Mfg: Primary &Fabricated metals 14: ..... ~'!~"';'~::~ ~!~L:'~ij'2,898,495 34,922 Affriculmrc: Crop Production &Service 31 ';:,,--~-~:,,.:!~7',3~13'~ 2,193,337 28,030 Mf8: Leather. Pottery. &Stone Goods 5 ';:!i~!~'~;';"'~'263 1,493,564 22,687 Exhibit 24 indicates which ten "basic" sectors had the highest employment in 1996. These are the sectors where the most basic tier economic activity is currently underway. Note the primacy of manufacturing. The list is similar to the others, though construction activity moved leather, pot- tery and stone goods on to the list. Exhibit 25.-Highest Average Pay Level, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula 1996 ! 10 Highest Sectors Firms Jobs Payroll Avg. Pay Basic Service: Wholesale Computers & Office Equip. 10 43 $583,989 $54~32~ Basic Service: Wholesale Electronics 12 96 1.172,871 48,870 Basic Service: En6ineers. Architects, Surveyors 19 119 1,343,794 45/170 Basic Sen'ice: Wholesale Machinery &Industrial Supplies 17 63 638,858 40,778 Basic Service: Wholesale Plastic. Chctmcal, Petroleum 9 50 504, 104 40,599 Consu-uction: General contractors-non-residential bldgs. 16 167 1,636,976 39,287 Mfg: Electrome equipment 13 1,530 14.295,350 31,382 Mfg: Instruments and related 10 1.504 13,295,100 . 35,351 NLF~: Primart' &Fabricated metals 14 332 2,898.495 34,922 N.~c: L~dus~na] rnac~-d;~r- 2~ ! 436 3.74~.587 34~3d4 Source: CA Employment Development Department, ECAP sector consolidation and ranking Exhibit 25 shows which 10 "basic" tier sectors that were the highest paying in 1996. Note that a large number of service and wholesaling companies appear for the first time. Most of the sectors on this list tend to be smaller, but they pay very well. Exhibit 26.-Highest Average Pay Increase, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors ........... :'~";'~:~ ~_~' :~%, _~j:L.L~_ ;.~ '. ...... ' '. ;..' ~'~"... :'~. ~'~ ..--.;; :' ' 10 Fastest Gro.ing Sectors F~.'7...,_; Jobs Payroll Avg. Pay Pay Gain 91-96 Basic Service: Wholesale Computers &Office Equip. 10 43 $583,989 $54,325 :., .:,.:..S22,938 Basic Service: Wholesale Plastic. Chemical, PeWoleum 9 50 504,104 40,599 ' :~; ~-*~ 21,471 Basic Service: Wholesale Electronics 12 96 1.172,871 48,870 . Mf8: Primary &Fabricated metals 14 332 2,898.495 34,922 ' ' '~ '15,327 Mf8: Printing &publishing 18 462 3.869.189 33.475 .':'~...'i%;~;~la;O10 ... Agriculture: Crop Production &Service 31 313 2,193,337 28,030 .:,: . ~.::...'1'1,548 Construction: Masonry and other stonework 5 15 99,982 27,268 ,-/"~ ~.717 Basic Service: Wholesale Bldg. Material & Supplies 8 42 298,243 28,404 '- 7.955 Mf8: Instruments and related 10 1,504 13,295,100 35,351 ' 7,680 Basic Service: Wholesale Farm & Flower Supplies 5 42 315,482 29,809 ' ' 7,032 Temecula Economic Development Strategy 24 12/02/98 Exhibit 26 presents the "basic tier" sectors where incomes grew the fastest ~'om 1991-1996. Three sectors appear on this list, that were not among the highest paying on Exhibit 25. Two of these were affiliated with construction activity, the other with farm supplies. Exhibit 27.-Highest Increase In Number Of Firms, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula 1991-1996 10 Fastest Growing Senon Firms Jobs Agriculture: Crop Production & Sendee 31 313 Mfg: Industrial machinery 21 436 Mfg: Primary &Fabricated metals 14 332 Basic Service: Computer related services, 13 33 Construction: General contractors-non-residential bldg. 16 167 Basic Service: Wholesale Electronics 12 98 Basic Service: Wholesale Plastic, Chemical, Petroleum 9 50 Construction: Other Specialty Contractors 21 116 Ivlfg: Electronic equipment 13 1,530 Construction: Plumbing, heating, and air-conditioning 24 62 Basic Service: Wholesale Computers & Offiee Equip. 10 43 Payroll $2,193,337 3,740,587 2,898,495 283,215 1,636,976 1,172,871 504, 104 826,859 14,295,350 414,470 583,989 Avg. Pay $28 030 34 344 34 922 34 329 39 287 48 870 40 599 28 431 37 382 26 597 54 325 Size Firms 91-96 10,1 31 ' 20,7 - -.-. 10 23,7 10 ":~"' 2.5' 10 ~Y' 10.4 . 10 ~ 8.0 7 "5.5 6 5.5-. 6 111.1' 6 2.5 6 4.3 6 Source: CA Employment Development Department, ECAP sector consolidation and ranking Exhibit 28 attempts to spot small "basic" firms that have had large percentage gains in employ- men:. These sectors are begira'ring to add stren~h to the economy, while remaining relativeiy in- visible. The recovery in construction shows up strongly in this table. Finally, Exhibit 29 (next page) looks at all 95 "basic" and "secondary" tiers to see which are the highest paying. This table was complied to see if there are parts of the "secondary" economy paying so well that efforts should be made to expand them. When Exhibit 29 is compared with Exhibit 25, four "secondary" tier sectors moved on to the highest paying list. The wholesale sector that includes Drugs is partially related to chemical and biological production, a key potential manufacturing target sector. The Utilities and Finance sectors will grow or shrink of their own volition regardless of city policy. Wholesale Other Goods is an eclectic category whose pay was distorted by one high paying firm. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 25 12/02/98 Jobs % 91-96 1,150.0% 463.6/, -., 442.4% 391.5% 261.0% 197.0% 136.5% 121.6% 10 Fastest Growing Secton Firms Jobs Payroll Avg. Pay Construction: General contractors-non-residential bldg. 16 167 $1,636,976 $39,287 Basic Service: Computer related services 13 33 283,215 34,329 Basic Service: Trucking &Warehousing 15 62 334,907 21,607 Mfg: Electrome equipment 13 1.530 14,295,350 37,382 Construction: Other Specialty Contractors 2! 116 826.859 28 431 Basxc Sen'me. W'noies~ie Eiec:xomcs 12 96 1,172,871 48,870 Mfg: Misc. Manufacturing 11 120 419,206 13,935 Mfg: Printing &publishing 18 462 3,869.189 33,475 Basic Service: Wholesale Plastic, Chemical, Petroleum 9 50 504, 104 40,599 Mfg: Plastic, Chemical, Bio Products 11 318 1,913,844 24,048 Source: CA Employment Development Department, ECAP sector consolidation and ranking Exhibit 28 shows which "basic" sectors saw the most new firms from 1991-1996. These are the sectors where people decided to open new businesses or migrate to Temecula. Note the average size ranges from 118 workers in the electronics manufacturing sector to 2.5 in computer services. Exhibit 28.-Highest Percent Increase In Jobs, 10 Highest Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecu{a 1991-1996 Exhibit 29-Highest Average Pay Level, 10 t4ighest Of All 95 Sectors Temecula 1996 Jobs 43 $583,989 96 1,172,871 148 1,681,027 119 1.343.794 63 638,858 40,778 50 504, 104 : - ..40,599 155 1,566,358 ' '.: 40,422 37 373,447: 40,012 167 1,636,976 39,287 43 404,485 ....... 37,627 Source: CA Employment Development Department, ECAP sector consolidation and ranking ,/Issue #14. Given these sector trends, what should be the industry targets for efforts to expand the Temecula economy? II. THE ISSUES & THE RECOMMENDATIONS In this section, the elements of an economic strategy for Temecula are recommended. They are designed to deal with the 15 issues identified in Section' I. Where recommendations bear on a specific issue, the number is shown, the issue is summarized, and a page number reference is given. At the request of staff, a recommended "next step" is shown for each issue. 1. Fundamental Policy Question. What is the ultimate objective of a city's economic de- velopment program? That is the fundamental question that conditions any economic strategy. For California cities, the answer is often a difficult one. On one hand, municipal leaders would like to take actions that expand the local employment opportunities of their citizens. On the other, their desire to deliver high quality municipal services forces them to deal with the primacy ,~,f sales taxes as a source of city revenue. Since most of the "econo~jc base" companies that ul- timately expand a region' s employment levels are not sales tax generators, the question of how to use scarce economic development staff time and budgets is often a difficult one. This dilemma led to Issue ~4. ,/Issue #4. (page 11) If the main priority of Temecula's economic policy is to broaden "basic tier" employment to reduce the dependency of residents on commuter jobs, con- centration should be on the expansion of manufacturers and service companies that sell o::isiae the local area. If the ma.: :.--ior.,-v is tc solidif,,' the C::7.; Hail revenL:e ba~e. major emphasis should be on recruiting "secondary tier" saies tax generators nge nauonai retailers or automotive dealerships. In Temecula's case, three facts argue strongly for an emphasis on efforts to expand the economic "base". First, the city's retail sales are growing rapidly, and its per capita retail sales are higher than those of any large Inland Empire city. The pending opening of the Promenade Mail will en- hance this strong position (Exhibits 19-20). Second, a high percentage of Temecula's workers are commuting, and many have indicated a de- sire to work closer to home, even at less pay (Exhibits 8-9). In the next few years, rapid residen- tial construction will likely exacerbate this problem. This situation was summarized in Issue #2. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 26 12/02/98 ~'Issue #2. (page 6) Temecula faces a widening local job to resident-~orker gap. There were 18,902 fewer jobs in city zip codes than area workers in 1991, that difference has grown to about 32,500 in 1998 (~xhibit 7). Clearly, the Temecula Valley's numerous ad- vantages are luring new population and workers much faster than the area economy is producing new jobs. A major economic issue facing Temecula is thus finding ways to ex- pand the local economy and slow the increase of the area' s "jobs to workers" gap. Finally, in questions to City Hall decision makers, ECAP found that nearly every elected and pointed official felt that one of their primary obligations was to find ways to increase local em- ployment opportunities for local resident-workers. Recommendation. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council adopt a policy statement that Temecula's economic development program make the expansion of "economic base" sectors its primary objective. Next Step. Staff' should ask for guidance from the City Council. If the recommendation is favorably received a policy statement should be dra_Qed. 2. Competitivehess. If"economic base" expansion is the principal objective of a city's eco- nomic development efforts, an immediate corollary must be a concern about the community's competitiveness vis-/i-vis other cities. A. Quality of Life. Qualitatively, competitiveness includes such important considerations as the law enforcement environment, the performance of schools, the natural setting, the family envi- ronment and access to recreational and cultural activities. Temecula scores very high on these accounts. B. Costs. Quantitatively, competitiveness is about the costs of doing business from a location. Ultimately, any business venture is about profit. Given a revenue stream, every extra $1.00 in cost savings is $1.00 in extra owner income. In fact, cost restraint is a more powerful way to raise income than sales increases. If sales rise $1.00, this often only partially increases profit as much of the new money must pay for the supplies and workers needed to increase production. · Distance & Cost. Temecula's location creates its main cost issues. The city is 22 to 47 miles farther from the main markets of San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles County than competitor communities like Corona, San Marcos, Chino or Riverside. For goods producers, depending on which competitor city is used and the size of loads assumed, a Temecula location translates into extra costs from $50,000 to $323,000 per year, if merchandise is shipped twice a day (Exhibit 15). For professionals serving clients in other cities, if three trips a week are as- sumed, distance translates into extra costs of $11,000 to $19,000 a year, depending on which market is chosen .-~ indicated, These extra cosus reduce company profits, dollar for doiiar. · Space Cost. As a new city, Temecula saw much of its existing commercial space develop in the late 1980s and very early 1990s when Southern Califomia's land prices were at an all-time high. The city's average prices for manufacturing and distribution space reflects the need by developers to recoup monies paid out in that time flame. Unfortunately, the end of the Cold War caused Southern California's industrial land prices to plummet, leaving much of the city's existing inventory in an uncompetitive position. Though Temecula's prices are low by coastal standards, they are the highest in the inland area where it most directly competes. This situa- tion has created controversies about the city's decision to charge Development Impact Fees Temecula Economic Development Strategy 27 12/02/98 (DIF) on commercial property, and the accuracy of industrial real estate data. The latter was discussed in Issue #5. /Issue #S. (page 12) Temecula would appear to need an independent derivation of the four sets of industrial real estate data: industrial space inventory; rate of space absorption by new occupants; square footage of vacant or about to be vacant space; lease rates com- pared to competitive markets. Without it, any assessment of the city's competitive posi- tion for "basic tier" industries will be suspect. With it, the discussion of economic policy can move from questions of fact to questions of community priorities. Recommendation: ECAP suggests that Temecula contract with a commercial real estate firm that is not currently a major player in the Temecula market to oversee the develop- ment of a city owned commercial real estate information database. To save money and as- sure independence, it is recommended that the city separately employ the persons con- ducting the surveys. Training, review, oversight and data interpretation would be con- ducted by the consulting firm. Next Step: Should Temecula elect to follow this course, ECAP has made contact with Lee & Associates in Riverside. This firm is not currently very active in the Temecula mar- ket, but is a major Southland commercial brokerage firm. They are willing to undertake the suggested assignment at a reasonable price. Brine Line Costs. On the surface, Temecula would seem to be an ideal location for the ex- pansion of the California ,computer industry. It is beautiful. It has a highly trained labor force that wants to work locally. Other high technology firms have already located in the region. However, to accommodate manufacturing firms from this sector, the community must ulti- mately have the capacity to transport their salt water effluent to the sea. As a young city, Te- mecula does not currently have this pipeline capacity. As a result, firms producing brine efflu- ent must transport it to such a facility at considerable cost. This was discussed in Issue #7. /Issue #7. (page 16') To increase its competitiveness, Temecula should engage Murrieta and area water districts in discussions of how to ~and and build a 14 mile brine line to Railroad Canyon Road at the I-15. There, it would connect with an existing line that will reach the Pacific Ocean in late 2000. The rough cost would be $23.5 million. Recommendation: The Eastern MWD is responsible for most of Temecula's sewer service and is part of the Santa Aria Watershed Project Authority (S,4 WP,4) that is building the Lake Elsinore-Corona reach of the brine line. Temecula's City Council should con- sider appointing a Council Committee to meet with board members of the Eastern MWD to start the ~rocess of putting the ciw in the piarming loeb on brine line matters. The Lak~ Elsinore-Corona line is being paid for by sewer capacity fights purchased by SAV~'PA's member agencies. It should be determined how this vehicle, or federal and state funds, might be used to ultimately bring this capacity to Temecula. At the appropriate time, Mumeta may wish to enter these discussions. Next Step. Staff level discussions should be held with International Rectifier to gain a more thorough understanding of the brine line issue. Staff level discussions should also be held with the Eastern Municipal Water District to garner additional information about the process of planning, funding, fight of way acquisition and construction for such a line. Mr. Ravishanker of Eastern MWD has been an excellent source of information. Tetnecula Economic Development Strategy 28 12/02/98 Water & Sewer Fees. Because their territories are new and rapidly growing, the P,~tncho California Water District and Eastern MWD must charge considerable "hook-up" fees to fund the infrastructure necessary to support new residential, retail, commercial, and industrial space. This adds to the cost of doing business in the Temecula region. As these agencies are independent political jurisdictions, their decisions reflect the narrow issues of immediate con- cern to them. However, the costs of their projects have implications for the broader economic competitiveness of the region. This was discussed in Issues #8 and #9. ,rlssue #8. (page 1 ~) Water and sewer fees are expensive and complex. While aimed at solving infrastructure problems for water agencies, they have a large impact on a commu- nity's competitiveness. It is an area of economic policy in which the interest of the public would be well served by continuous discussions, information exchanges and brain storm- ing among professionals from local cities and water agencies about how to mitigate these high infrastructure costs. Recommendation. Special districts will work in isolation unless they are asked to assist in tackling broader economic concerns. This process must start at the political level. If the City Council decides to appoint a committee on the brine line, it would be an appropri- ate group to start this process as well. The intent would be to bring together the financial tools and the thinking of various levels of government, in an attempt to lower the cost structure and increase the competitiveness ofthe Temecula Valley. Next Step. The same staff member investigating the brine line issue would be the appro- priate person to open a dialogue about creating regular meetings and/or periodic work- shops where city and water agency staffs could share information and build relationships. ~'Issue #9. (page 18) Both the Eastern MWD and the Rancho California Water District are willing to assist developers in spreading the cost of their fees over time. The former charges 10%, the latter charges the prime rate. These rates are higher than the tax exempt rates at which these agencies borrow, or the maximum yields they can earn on surplus funds invested in pools like the CA Local Agency Investment Fund. For this reason, an attempt should be made to convince these agencies to lower their rates to these truer cost of capital. This would be a contribution to reducing the cost of conducting business in Temecula. Recommendation. If policy level discussions are held with water agency board members, a request could be made to the water agencies to extend this courtesy to local businesses and developers in the interest of lowering the cost of doing business in the Temecula area. Next Step. City staff should check the extent to w.hich the area's water agencies are funded tm-ougn tax exempt finance, anti ti~e extent to which they are invested in the Cali- fornia Local Agency Investment Fund. Proceeding with the .appeal suggested here would not occur if the cost of capital is not as assumed here. Workers As A Cost Advantage. In looking for ways to offset the high cost of its location, Temecula's primary asset is a labor force with an extensive range of managerial, professional, technical and machine craft skills. Today, many of these workers live in the city but work many miles away. Surveys indicate that a large number of them are willing to accept less pay to work closer to home. They give Temecula the chance to offer prospective employers ac- cess to technically skilled workers, at competitive pay scales, at a time when firms are having Temecula Economic Development Strategy 29 12/02/98 trouble finding good labor anywhere. The city's challenge is to harness this asset. This was raised in Issue #3. ~lssue #3. (page 8) How can Temecula's highly trained commuter-workers, who are willing to work for a little less to avoid driving long distances, be identified, quantified, and information about them used to recruit employers to the city? Recommendation. In today's world, most of Temecula's commuter work force should be comfortable with the internet. What is needed is a system that would allow these workers to efficiently announce to the world that they are available for work in a local firm. The system would need to meet several requirements: · Workers must be able to list their skills, industry preferences, work experience, educational or technical training, and salary requirements. · At the worker's option, listings could bepublic with a link to the worker's e- mail address or home page. · Listings could be confidential for workers not wanting to risk having a current employer know that they are seeking a new position. In this case, a potential employer could leave a message that a worker could later retrieve. Contact with a prospective employer would then be at the worker's discretion. · The system should be capable of compiling summary statistics on all listed workers. This is needed so that the economic development specialists can ad- vertise the number, categories and pay requirements of skilled workers avail- able to firms migrating to Temecula. · Employers should be able to post available jobs on the system with hyperlinks to their home pages. · Once operational, the system should be housed with an internet provider and be relatively maintenance free. Once this job system became operational, the City of Temecula would have to engage in a dramatic and continuous program to convince local commuter-workers and employers to use it. Technological efforts of this kind usually do not fail because of design technicali- ties or operational costs. Rather, they fail from lack of use as people or firms do not know about them, cannot find them, doubt their effectiveness, or fear a lack of confidentiality. Utility mailings, city newsletters, the city cable television station, business site visitations and the city internet home page are some of the ways that the system could be promoted. .-~c, op~ion of this job program would allow the City of Temecuia to snow its citizens the extent of its efforts to expand local employment opportunities and by extension the quality of community and family life. The success of such a system would place the city at the cutting edge of the "smart community" movement. Next Step. Three internet providers have been contacted about the cost of creating a system as specified: one private, one public and one owned by the Press Enterprise. Each indicates that the design of the system is feasible at a relatively low cost. In addition, UCR and the CA Employment Development Department have developed systems that are close to meeting the requirements outline here. If the decision is made to investigate this ap- proach, contact needs to be made with these entities. Tcmecula Economic Development Strategy 30 12/02/98 · Costs & Governmental Policy. The City of Temecula, through its taxes and fees, has a di- rect impact on the cost of doing business in the city. Given the competitive cost disadvan- tages of "basic tier" firms moving to the region, this is an arena in which the city can directly impact its economic environment. This was raised in Issue #6. ~'Issue #6. (page ]5) To the extent that the City of Temecula's policies work to lower the costs of conducting business in the city, they will serve to make it more likely that "basic tier" industrial firms will migrate to it. To the extent that city policy works to raise these costs, they will serve to make such migrations less likely. Recommendation. California cities are often advised to look at their business fee sched- ules with an eye towards finding ways to lower them for the sake of competitiveness. These suggestions rarely lead to significant changes. However, Temecula is in an unusual situation. It faces a clear and growing gap between the number of resident-workers and the number of high quality local jobs, resulting in ever increasing numbers of commuters. Companies locating in the city face significant distance and other cost penalties. The community has a strong and growing retail tax base. Given these facts, the way in which Temecula handles the costs it imposes on local "basic" sector firms sends a clear signal about the extent to which it wants to encourage the de- velopment of local "basic" tier jobs. For this reason, it is strongly recommended that the city take an unusually ruthless look at the fees it places on "basic tier" firms. Ideally, the city should have the lowest fees in the Inland Empire as part of a policy of helping to overcome the community's cost disadvan- tages. The alternative is to have the city be either a neutral or negative force in the af- fecting the gap between the growth of local workers and local high quality jobs. Next Step. Temecula must decide the extent to which its budget, and the projects funded by it, are more or less important than the desire to close or slow the commuter gap. 3. Organization of Economic Activity.. Temecula's economic development activities in- toire three jisunc: and cooperating entities: Temecuta Valley Economic Developmere Corp~..- lion, Temecula Chamber of Commerce, and City of Temeeula Economic Development staff. Their separate and joint responsibilities were detailed earlier (page 22). Changes in the program's emphasis are recommended. This was raised in Issue #13. ¢'Issue #13. (page 22) Should there be changes in the structure of Temecula's economic development effort? A. Organization. It is recommended that the execution of the City of Ternecula's economic 3~:a:e~' retain ~ts current character, with city staff unaertaking the various aadiuonal assignments described above. However, in the execution of the community's future economic development strategy, it is recommended that much heavier reliance be placed on efforts to retain and expand existing companies. Explanation. The firms currently doing business in Temecula have already demonstrated a willingness to locate and grow in the city. The issues they face will be the same issues that must be overcome in attempting to lure new companies to the city. By working closely with existing companies, economic development specialists will be helping to pre- Temecula Economic Development Strategy 31 12/02/98 serve and grow local jobs while learning about the issues that must be addressed in luring similar firms to town. Database. What firms should be contacted? T~necula owns a database of every firm in the city as of 1996. It can update this information from the CA Employment Development Department (EDD) at very little cost. An analysis of these data can provide lists of "ba- sic" firms ranked in importance using one or more of several criteria (e.g., most new work- ers, highest paying firms, most total workers, percentage job growth). Experience has shown that this process will create a.list of"important" firms some of which will be totally unknown to city economic and governmental leaders. That, of course, is one reason for using this approach. NOTE.' The sectors (as opposed to firms) in Exhibits 22-29 were ranked using a single criteria. Exhibit 30 (page 33) was created using multiple criteria. Program of contact. The priority lists from the database analysis will provide Temecula with the target rirms for a rigorous, tightly scheduled, continuous and formal process of contacting the city's most important firms (the more contacts the better). This process can involve the Temecula Valley EDC, city staff, school officials, and/or elected officials. Extensive programs of this type are underway in several Inland Empire cities with fasci- nating results. Mayor Loveridge of Riverside, for instance, attributes his 300 company visits to changing his understanding of the city's economy and how local government ira- pacts it. A similar outcome should occur with those involved in the Temecula process. Ultimately, the result should be a better economic policy and better execution of it. Next Step. The key to this undertaking is its control by professionals dedicating to its dis- ciplined execution. Given the city's investment in the Temecula Valley EDC, a contract could be awarded to that organization to design and execute a program of the type de- scribed here, including the required number of monthly visitations and the feedback proc- ess. One legal hurdle will be access by EDC staff to the city's EDD database. It is re- stricted to confidential city employees. and consultants bound by strict EDD non- disclosure rules, subject to penalties. This should be overcome by making a key EDC ex- ecutive a confidential consultant to the city subject to those non-disclosure provisions. B. Targets. Exhibit 30 below shows the sectors of the Temecula city economy that appear to offer the best chance for expanding the city's economy. The compilation of this list arises from Issue # 14. ,/Issue #14. (page 26) Based upon the several listings of firms in Exhibits 22-29, what shouid be the industry targets far e~3-.~s to expand the Temecuia e~,onomy? Recommendation, The sectors in Exhibit 30 were compiled from the 38 "basic" sectors used for Temecula's economy (of95 total sectors). The list was based upon six criteria: · Highest average pay in 1996 (10) · Largest increase in jobs from 1991-1996 (6) · Most jobs in 1996 (3) · Largest increase in average pay between 1991-1996 (4) · Fastest percentage of job growth, 1991-1996 (3) Temecula Economic Development Strategy :32 12/02/98 · Largest number of new firms in a sector, 1991-1996 After the 38 sectors were ranked for each of these criteria, the ranks were weighted in im- portance using the values shown in the parentheses. The sum of these weighted ranks identifies the sectors that past history shows are the most likely to provide Temecula with the best combinations of average pay, job growth, and numbers of jobs. Next Step. These are the "basic" sectors in which companies have "answered with their feet". They have come to Temecula and are providing the city with its best qualitative combination of employment and payroll factors. The database from which these firms are derived provides a more complete list of who they are (available to confidentia! sfa.~). Contact with them can explain what it is about Temecula's environment that has caused them to be in the city and to thrive. This information would form the basis for marketing efforts to similar firms. Exhibit 30.-Best 10 Sector Targets Of 38 Basic Sectors Temecula 1991-1996 Weights 10 6 3 4 3 5 0 Avg. Pay Job Jobs Avg. Pay % Job Firms Size 10 Fastest Growing Sectors 1996 Growth 1996 Growth Growth Growth 1996 Mfg: Electronic equipment 37,382 1,248 1,530 6,377 442.4% 6 117.7 Mfg: Printing &publishing 33,475 307 462 13,010 197.0% 0 25.7 Construction: Genera] contractors-nonresidential b]dg 39,287 153 167 6,977 1150.0% 10 10.4 Mfg: Primary & Fabricated metals 34.922 175 332 15,327 111.5% 10 23.7 Basic Service: Wholesale Electronics 48,870 71 96 20,826 284.0% 7 8.0 Consu'uction: Other Specialty. Contractors 28,431 93 116 4,664 391.5% 6 5.5 Mfg: instruments and related 35,351 129 1,504 7,680 9.4% 3 150.4 Basic Sen'ice: Wholesale Medical 28,144 265 525 1,374 102.3% 4 75.0 Mfg: indusma] machmer>.' 34,344 197 436 (1,692) 82.3% 10 20.7 Basic Sen'ice: Wholesale Plastic, Chemical, Petroleum 40,599 29 50 21,471 136.5% 6 5.5 Source: CA Employment Development Department, ECAP sector consolidation and ranking C. Education. Because Temecula is a new city, iT is some distance from the college campuses that serve it. This is a difficulty for those local firms wishing direct access to college researchers, graduate students, interns and college conducted worker training. UCR and UC Extension are making a concerted effort to bridge this gap at the university level. However, it is at the commu- nity college level that a great deal of the needed training must occur. If Temecula, under the aus- pices of the Temecula Valley EDC, institutes a formal, rigorous and continuous program of em- ployer retention visitations, it would be particularly useful to have Mt. San Jacinto College repre- sentatives, join UC extension representatives as par~ of this effort. This was raised as Issue ,~1. · '<Issue #1. (page 4) As Temecula works to retain, expand and recruit businesses, an im- portant tool available to some communities is the direct involvement of college represen- tatires in continuous visitation programs to local employers, and as part of organized ef- forts to retain and expand local firms. As worker training is often the key to such efforts, greatly increased participation of Mt. San Jacinto College in direct contacts with local businesses is needed. Recommendation. Eugene Kadow, Chairman of the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees is a retired community college economics professor, who was once Chairman of a college Business Division and a college Dean. During his career, he ran a sophisticated Temecula Economic Development Strategy 33 12/02/98 program whereby community college professors were respons~le for a host of worker training programs designed, and run in conjunction with the local business community. Kadow has indicated an interest in seeing Mt. San Jacinto College play a similar role in Temecula's business community. As part of his due diligence, in anticipation of selecting a new President for the college, he is prepared to explore these issues with the city's eco- nomic development staff and with the EDC. Next Step. This is an opportune time to contact Mr. Kadow and bring him up to speed on economic development issues in Temecula. 4. Other Issues. Finally, this analysis has found two collateral sets of issues affecting the Te- mecula economy. The first is the extensive impact that population and economic growth is having on the city' s transportation system. The other is the potential impact of the destination resort that the Southern California Metropolitan Water District is planning at the Eastside Reservoir. · Transportation. As a rapidly growing young city, Temecula finds its transportation system is under considerable strain. Two transportation issues are therefore of economic importance to the community. These were raised in Issues #10 and #11. ilssue #10. (page 21) Temecula was incorporated after the passage of Measure A which added ½ % to Riverside County's sales tax to build a menu of highway projects and re- gional arterials. Though the city benefits from its local share of revenue from this meas- ure, its long range needs for regional transportation improvements were not part of the program. As Riverside County leaders look forward to extending Measure A, Temecula's leaders must identify projects to be included in any future Measure A list of priority proj- ects. These needs might include such projects as off and on ramps and a wider overpass at Santiago Road, similar facilities at Cherry Street, and a widening of Route 79 to the Eastside Reservoir. The list might be extended to include development of a route from the proposed Overland Drive overpass, across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road (perhaps on Via Montezurna). The latter would be designed to keep local commuter traffic away from the Winchester Road and Rancho California Road interchanges. Recommendation. With the passage of SB 1851, an elected official from Temecula will sit on the Riverside County Transportation Commission. As county leaders begin consid- ering a vote to extend Measure A, that appointee will be well positioned to ensure that the city's top rated regional projects make it onto the regional priority list. Next Step. The city staff appears to have this issue under control. · /'Issue ~11. (z~c:..~e 21) The Cities of Teme:u!a and Murrie:~- need to reach an am'eement for the iiruiage of Diaz Roaa ana V~:asnin~on Avenue. This noah-south corridor would provide an alternative to the I-15 for vehicles wishing to move between the two cities. In this respect, it would play the same role in reducing traffic in the west as the expansion of Margarita Road will play in eastern Temecula. As the employment base in western Teme- cula is largely made of "basic", non-sales tax generating firms, Murrieta merchants and city revenues benefit from them to the extent that commuters from that city earn pay checks in these firms but spend the money near their homes. The easier the commute between the two communities, the more likely this is to happen. Temccula Economic Development Strategy :M 12/02/98 Recommendation. Now that the City of Murrieta has rejoined the Temecula Valley Eco- nomic Development Corporation that organization would seem to be an appropriate forum for the discussion of regional issues such as this transportation link. Temecula may wish to formally ask the EDC to make the brokering of a solution to this regional problem a priority issue. Next Step. Staff should explore this sensitive issue with the City Council. If this appears to be a useful avenue of approach, a discussion with the EDC's leadership should ascertain whether there is a willingness to tackle this issue. Eastside Reservoir. Temecula has a well developed and sophisticated tourism policy that has enhanced the city's reputation as a destination tourism location. The one part of the city's tourist environment that has not realized its potential has been Old Town. However, this area has been the subject of several specialized studies. A potential tourism asset that has not been at the top of the city's agenda is the Eastside Reservoir north of Temecula on Highway 79. While the Southern California Metropolitan Water District has decided against boat-body contact at the facility, it is proposing a significant destination resort & recreation complex with projected tourist visitations rising from 2.0 million in 2004 to a peak of 3.S million in 2010. This was raised in Issue #12. ,/Issue #12. (page 22) Temecula's tourist economy will be positively impacted by devel- opments at the Eastside Reservoir. Its traffic flow will be negatively impacted. For these reasons, it is important the city leaders closely monitor the planning occurring at the site. Recommendation. The Southern California Metropolitan Water District has a variety of advisory groups with which it is has been in contact during the development of plans for the Eastside Reservoir. With those plans reaching their final stages, the City of Temecula needs to become involved in this advisory network. Next Step. Temecula city staff should begin this process by contacting Jim Henderson, a contract staff member coordinating the work at the Eastside Reservoir Project. He can be reached through the Southern California MetropoliTan Water District office in Los Ange- ies, or through the construction office in Winchester. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 35 12/02/98 Appendix A Notes From Earlier Focus Group Discussions The Focus Groups. In order to move beyond the data, ECAP conducted a series of interview sessions in Spring 1998 with a variety of groups and individuals from Temecula's economic and political leadership. These included: · Each of the five City Council Members · City Manager Ron Bradley · Former Economic Development Director Mary Jane Olhasso · The City Department Heads · Representatives of the Temecula Chamber of Commerce · The full Chamber Board of DireCtors (final draft) · Representatives of the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation · Executive Committee Members of the Temecula Valley EDC (final draft) · Representatives of the Temecula Manufacturer' s Council · James O'GTady, Assistant City Manager (final draft) · R. Many Smith, BRE (final draft) What The Focus Grouns Revealed. Universally, the people who live in Temecula like Temecula. They are proud of its community oriented life style. They enjoy its prosperity. They believe it is one of the nicest places to live and work in Southern California. And, they are grate- ful that even new residents, despite their often long commutes, have a willingness to rapidly join community efforts. However. they also have concerns, It is these cencerns with which the communi~ must deal if it is to preserve what many believe to be a potentially idyllic community. For that reason, this strat- egy document is compelled to focus on these issues. It should be noted that the issues raised by the focus groups were the same ones that jumped out of the data. These issues therefore are the ones that an economic strategy will need to solve. Traffic & Transportation. When participants in focus groups were asked to address their main fears for Temecula, nearly every participant focused immediateIv on traffic. This ranged from dif- ficulty for commuters trS.~ng to get on and off '.~f:ne !- ! _~. To ~he :' '-:~,' ,,-a~: ~hev raze in movinz across it. Firms cited the difficulty of moving workers between Temecuia and Mumeta, and an increasing difficulty in moving large trucks to and from the I-15. City representatives have focused heavily on the traffic circulation issue, and believe that they have developed a financially feasible infrastructure program to deal with the worse bottle necks involving the spanning of the I-15 freeway. However, population growth forecasts for the region would appear to leave this item on the agenda for the foreseeable future. Compounding the difficulty is the fact that Temecula did not exist when Riverside County leaders created the work program for Measure A, which passed in 1988. A good deal of the money from this '/~ cent sales tax measure is programmed to finance major regional infrastructure improve- Temecula Economic Development Strategy 38 12/02/98 ments. However, none of these projects is in Temecula, despite what is an obvious need for ex- panded access and egress from the I-15 in the city, and the need to expand Route 79. The recent agreement on how SB 45 state fimds will be allocated, did nothing to alleviate this situation. Meanwhile, Temecula and Murrieta have not yet reached a meeting of the minds on the expansion of access routes between the two communities. This atmosphere appears to be improving with Mumeta recent defeat of a severe growth control measure, their decision to become pan of the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation (EDC), and their apparent success with the proposed Roger-Dale development. Commuting. The focus group participants expressed varying levels of fear about Temecula be- coming a latch key community. The data tend to support those with the worst fears. The city experienced employment growth of 45.1% in a period when its population growth was 61.4%. Yet, in this same period, the Inland Empire was adding jobs (12.2%) faster than people went looking for them (7.4%). The city was thus becoming relatively people rich and job poor at a time when the reverse was happening in the area around it. Survey's showing that 68% of Temecula's residents are commuters, and that :35% are willing to accept 10% or more less pay to work near the city are emblematic of the problem. Again, apart from the human cost, this is an economically rational choice as their average driving time of 7.2 hours a week is adding 17.9% to their traditional 40 hour work period. While the commuting problem is severe today, there is every indication that it will soon get much worse. As indicated, Riverside County is expected to add 800,000 people in the next 12 years. That population forecast comes from the CA Department of Finance, whose projections have are usually conservative. Meanwhile, with a strong economic expansion now occurring in Southern California, Riverside County population is showing clear signs of taking off- In 1997, it added 40,000 people and had the fastest growth rate in Southern California. In 1998, new home sales are up a staggering 43.8%. Yhis environment will have a profound impact on Temecula's population. It is one of the most beautiful areas of the county. Its new homes sell for $114.000 less than the Orange Count' me- clian price and $71,000 below the San Diego County median. And, just 7,602 of the 22,038 homes permitted in city and adjacent unincorporated area specific plans have been built. At the same time, while existing firms are adding employment, there have been few only a few relocations or major expansions of"basic" tier firms in the city in the past two years. From focus group conversations with existing major employers, cost seemed to be the dominant concern. Space Cost. The business sector participants in the focus group sessions were unanimous in their eniovmem of an area with a beautiful enviroranent. ~ood schools. educated workers and a low crime rate. However, they are becoming increasingly concerned about their costs of doing busi- ness in Temecula. Nearly every firm fights transportation costs due to the city' s relatively remote location from their major suppliers and markets in San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties. They would nor- mally have expected to make up for their added transportation costs with lower space costs, as Temecula is an outlying area. However, this is not the case. Space in the city is averaging $0.43 a foot per month. That is actually above the average for Los Angeles County ($0. 39) and is sub- stantially above the highest other sub-markets of the Inland Empire ($0.31-%0.32). Though Or- Temecula Economic Development Strategy :~7 12/02/98 ange ($0.49) and outlying San Diego County sites ($0.52-$0.54) are more expensive, the differ- entials are not enough to make up for the transportation cost issue. Infrastructure Cost. Meanwhile, Temecula firms served by the Rancho California Water District find themselves facing severe increases in water and sewer connection fees that many see as pro- hibitive. One key firm, International Rectifier, explained that a major by-product of its operation is water that is high in Total Dissolved Solids. This water must be disposed of in an industrial brine line. As no such facility exists in Temecula, the firm currently must truck its water to San Bernardino. Currently, there are plans to extend the brine line serving the 1-15 corridor south to Lake Elsinore. There are no plans to bring it to Temecula. Under normal conditions, Temecula would seem ideally situated for the computer chip and other advanced manufacturing firms. This is particularly the case as high costs are driving many firms away from expanding in Silicon Valley and San Diego. However, the combination of space and transportation costs, with expensive water and the lack of a brine line are working against it. D[F Fees. It is in this cost environment that the discussion over Development Impact Fees must be viewed. These are fees that the City of Temecula is considering levying on firms doing busi- ness in the city to make up for their infrastructure impact. Fee deposits have been paid by most companies. In most cases, however, the actual fee schedules are anticipated to impose levies higher than these amounts. Many in the city feel that these impact fees are a necessity, if infrastructure is to be expanded to accommodate both a growing economy and population. The difficulty is the impact that DIF fees will have on the city's already digcult competitive position. An economy is driven to a large ex- tent by executives making cost decisions with an eye toward their own careers and the company's bottom line. A spectacular environment can overcome some lack of competitiveness. California's growth after World War II is proof of that. So was the migration of firms to Temecula early in this decade. However, there is a level beyond which cost concerns will dominate. The state found this in the early 1990s. It is a risk that Temecula must very. carefully evaluate today. Labor Force Training. One way in which Temecula can compensate for its relatively remote location is through offering skilled labor at below market rate. The willingness of city workers to work for less to avoid commuting is thus a significant potential economic advantage for the com- munity. To date, this does not appear to be an advantage that has worked its way into city marketing ef- forts. In addition, though the area educators appear ready to offer specialized training to firms located in Temecula, there appears to be little awareness of this among existing, much less poten- ually new employers. This gap is not unique to Temecula. It is found throughout the Inland Empire. In part, it speaks to a communications gap between the education and business communities. Executives in highly competitive firms have little time to participate in the kind of community networking that would alert them to the programs available. Most educators live in an uncompetitive world, and do not feel compelled to aggressively seek out employers at their places of business. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Inland Empire economy is composed of thousands of small em- ployers (Temec~la's average: 12 woricers), and most university, state college or community col- lege campuses have assigned just one or two administrators to the task of interfacing with them. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 38 12/02/98 Organization of Economic Devdopment. A key issue that arose from the focus group discus- sions was that of the orgwiT~tion of economic development efforts in Temecula. Currently, re- sponsibilities are divided between the Temecula Redevelopment Agency which handles economic development strategy, outreach materials, fast tracldn~ incentives and research~ the Temecula Valley EDC which conducts site tours with prospects and business retention visits and surveys~ and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce which staffs trade shows, responds to individual inquires, conducts visitor tours, and maintains community calendars and guides. Clearly, all three of these institutions have important roles to play in the economic development process. In particular, the recent decision by the City of Murrieta to join the Temecula Valley EDC opens up the possibility of that organization playing an expanded function in regional net- working. If there is a single weakness in most economic development efforts, it is the lack of strong ties between business owners in "basic" se~ors like high technology services, manufacturing and dis- tribution, and representatives of the governmental and education communities. These basic sec- tors are crucial as they are responsible for most of the growth in any local economy. Yet, it is difficult to tear down the barriers that isolate them from governmental and educational leaders. The problem is one of isolation. Most businesses of this type are small, function in highly com- petitive environments and are led by owners or managers who rarely have time to leave their of- fices. At the same time, the government and education sectors are not particularly set up to ag- gressively move into the field to make contact with people about whom they need to learn more. Unfortunately, if this gap is not bridged, the public sector may either badly harm or fail to stimu- late crucial sources of local employment without realizing it. For these reasons, it would seem that Temecula's economic development efforts should involve making a staff member of the EDC a confidential consultant to the City staff. This would allow that person to access the city's database of companies, and use it to identify ranked lists of firms to be visited as part of a well ordered, disciplined visitation program. Ideally, visitations would involve the public officials, the EDC, city, staff, Mt. San Jacinto College and UC Extension staff in appropriate combinations. Market Niche. Temecula does not have the resources to pursue new firms in an unlimited array of sectors. The city has made high technology employment a priority, and endeavored to pene- trate the production sectors of the blotethnology industry. With a change occurring in the leadership of the city's economic development efforts, it would appear to be time to revisit the strengths and weaknesses of the city economy, and how they cor- restrand to the needs of appropriate industry targets. In doing so, it should be remembered that economic recruitment is less a matter of convincing firms to come to an area than it is ensuring that they understand when an area's cost structure makes it in their interest to come. The primary goal of recruitment efforts is therefore to ensure that there is no "friction of information" between executives who should come to an area, and the facts they need to know. The exception would be executives who might be convinced to move a firm to Temecula simply because they would like to live in the area. Temecula Economic Development Strategy 39 12/02/98 ITEM 10 CI APPROVAL ~,;;~%~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Mike Brown, Fire Chief April 20, 1999 Options for Enhancing the City's Emergency Medical Services Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager Receive and file report that describes options for enhancing the City's emergency medical services. BACKGROUND: On September 15, 1998 Riverside County approved a County Master Emergency Ambulance Agreement with American Medical Response (AMR). This agreement breaks the County into seven operating zones, with Temecula being included in the Southwest zone. Currently, the City of Temecula has two 24-hour ambulances in the City. This service level was recently increased because AMR was having difficulty meeting their contractual requirements (90% of responses within 10 minutes) in the Southwestern zone. As an example of AMR's past performance, according to their February statistics. AMR responded to calls within 10 minutes 'S: c ~ th, e time. This numDer has since increasecl, with the March statistics showing 90.1% anc~ meeting contractual requirements. It should be noted that because these statistics are produced by AMR and have not been approved by County EMS, the actual numbers are subject to change. Beginning April 1 st, AMR will begin to receive fines for not meeting the required response time. The maximum fine for each late call is $200. ......... a. meetine needs and contractua! recuir"'m"',fS cf the Southwest zone, the County Emergency Services Agency nas established an aclmznislrative oversight group to review AMR's performance. The Administrative oversight group includes representatives of the Cities of Temecula, Murietta, Canyon Lake, and Lake Elsinore, along with Riverside County Fire, County EMS staff and AMR. In addition, a City Council sub-committee, comprised of Mayor Ford and Mayor Pro-Tem Stone, has been working with the County and AMR to monitor and improve AMR's performance. Having met with the County and AMR, the Council sub-committee has requested that the Fire Department present options to supplement AMR's service to Temecula residents. County Fire Chief James Wright will present these options for the Council during this meeting, and staff recommends that the level of enhanced emergency medical services be addressed in the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget process, which is currently underway. Finally, during the State of the City address in March, Mayor Ford asked the business community for contributions to enhance the City's emergency medical services. Staff recommends that a special account be set up to account for these donations. To date, two such donation in the totaling $11,000 have been received. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact will be determined during Fiscal Year 1990-00 Annual Operating Budget process. ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY D RECToR OF F NANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Managr~''/ April 20, 1999 Consideration of Ways and Means Committee to Examine Issues Associated with Construction of a Sports Complex RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider formation of a Ways and Means Committee to examine issues associated with possible construction of a sports complex BACKGROUND: Councilman Lindemans has requested that this item be placed on the April 20, 1999 Council Agenda for your discussion and consideration. R.. IA GENDA REPORTS ~CONS TRUC T/ON OF SPORTS COMPLEX. DOC 4/14/99 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINA c.-.--- City MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 20, 1999 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of March, 1999. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report March 1999 Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: April 20, 1999 WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: This phase of the loop ramp project improvement is now complete. The landscape maintenance period has begun and the contractor is correcting punch list items. On April 2, 1999 additional plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for review 1) widened both the southbound and northbound on-ramps to two lanes, 2 ) widen the north side of Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to the northbound on-ramp to provided an additional lane optional westbound right turn lane, and 3) modify the existing median island just east of Front Street to extend the existing left turn pocket. The City is trying to accelerate this new work so it can bc included in the loop ramp contract as a change order. 2. MarlZarita Community Park Phase I: The park dedication is April 22. The project improvements include restrooms, parking areas, picnic areas, play equipment, tennis courts, a roller hockey rink, ballfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open turf areas as well as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its ullimate width. The project is c~m~pleted and is currently in a 90-day landscape maintenance period. 3. Old Town Streetscape Project The sn'cct imprt~vements have been completed. A punch list and other detail items are now being worked on various dimtractors. 4. 1-15/~Vinchester Southhound Off-ramp Widening: The contractor has completed the second phase of paving on the southbound exit ramp consisting of widening ti~¢ ~,,.~thbi~und or:f-ramp to provide an additional left turn lane. The City is currently desi~nin.g an auxiliary ~-y,~t lane t,~r the soum~ounU 1-15 Freeway off-ramp north ot the Santa Gertrudis Creek. This will allow .~,r signilicantly more vehicle storage off of the freeway. Once this design is completed, the plans will be submitted to Calltans tier approval. 5. Temecula Duck Pond Park: The rough grading, duck pond construction and site improvements are now nearly complete and the final gr:.lin~ :~nd tandscanin,.z will take nlace durin:o April. The handstand and restr,~om struztures are u'artic delays may occur during ~e final paving & striping operaflora. Park improvemenB include a gazebo/bandsmnd, picnic hcilities, a restroom, walkways, a parhng lot, securiW lighting, monumenntion, landscaping and irrigation. The strut improvemenB will comist of ~e wide~ng of Ynez Road to ~11 wid~ between Rancho Calitbrnia Road and Tierra Vista Road and will include new sidewalh, additioml turn lanes, traffic sigml modificatiom at Ynez Road and Rancho Califor~a Road, a new traffic si~al at Ynez Road and 'Fierra Vista Road, and pavement restriping to improve traffic circulation. Cttml~letion is scheduled tbr June 1999. moactrpt/cip199/rnar 6. Margarita R~md Sidewalk (Rancho Vista to Pauba Road): Demolition and rciocation of existing facilities is continuing. Rapid progress should be made as soon as the varitms utilities are relocated. The improvements will include the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The sidewalk will improve access to the Rancho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, additive alternate improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfields along with an expanded parking area. Construction is expected to be completed in April 1999. 7. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening: The contractor is continuing to rough ~ade along Winchester Road and Ynez Road and will be~n placing base the third week of April. Electrical sub-contractor is continuing to place streetlight and traffic signal conduits. RCWD relocation on Ynez Road is complete. The contractor has began the placement of curb and gutter. Construction is scheduled to be completed in August 1999. 8. Overhind Drive Street Improvements & Margarita Road Street Widening: The conn'actor has completed the box culvert at Overland Drive, grading of the Long Canyon Creek channel beg~n the first week of April. A new detour for the construction of the box culvert at Margarita Road should hc ctmplete the third week of April. The electrical sub-contractor is conlinuing to place street light and traffic Mgnal underground. ('onstruction is scheduled to be completed in August 1999. 9. XVinchester Road Median Islands and Enterprise Circle Traffic Signal: The ctmlractt}r is expected to have the new traffic signal at Winchester Road and Enterprise Circle N, ,rth "S~}uth up and running on the week of April 13, 1999. The median island work will begin on April 14. The pr,,iect includes the installation of a median island, landscaping and irri~tion along Winchester Road from ~ct,'cr~,m Avenue t,~ 900' west. The new median island at Jet'.+~r~on Avenue will be cork~;tructed to provide for a i, roger left turn pocket for northbound traffic. C~,nstrt,ction has begun. the estimated completion date is June 1999. 10. Traffic Silznal at Rancho Calih~rnia Road and Via Los Colinas: Inslallati,m t~t' the traffic signal by DBX, Inc. has commenced with the layout of pole foundations and T'~I'L~I"iI"itIi~Iq ~,~t' the sit~. C~mstrttction began in March 1999 with an estimated completion date of June 1999. 2 moactrpt/cip/99/mar i 1. I- ! 5/Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement: The contractor will be performing the following construction operations: Reconstruction of 1,000 feet of Jeft~rson Avenue, relocafion of an existing sewer line, grading for foofings/abulments, pile driving east of the l- 15 freeway, and storm drain/channel improvements. The project includes construction of an 800 foot bridge over i-15, installing a new traffic signals where Overland Drive meets Jefferson Avenue relocafion of SCE power lines, and misc. irrigation/landscape improvements. The estimated construction time for the entire project is 13 months. 12. Pala R~md Bridge: The clearing operation is complete with overexcavation and preparation of the site for the bridge foundation c,mtinuing through the month of April. The pile driving operation is scheduled to be~n the second week of April. This prt~iect will include realignment of Pala Road from Highway 79 South to Rainbow Canyon Road, including a new bridge, installation of two new traffic signals, the removal of one existing traffic signal, side~'alks, landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, bike lanes, signing, striping, channel improvements, and prm, isi,ms fi~r Wetland Mitigation. It is anticipated that the new bridge will be open for vehicle traffic by .JillltlarV 2000. Ctmstruction began March 1, 1999 with an estimated completion date of March 2000. 13. Tennis Court Lighting at Temecula Valley High School The ('itv Council awarded the project at the March 23, 1999 meeting. A pre-construction meeting is expected t, t bc c, ,nducted in mid-April. This project will install tennis court lighting along with landscaping, irrigation, ~cncing. striping. and minor concrete work at Temecula Valley High School. (', m>~ructi{m is anticipated to begin in May 1999 with an estimated completion date of July 1999. OUT TO BID: i. Rolary Park The Inid ~q~ening was held on April 1, 1999 and staff will be recommending award at the April 13, 1999 City (',~uncil meeting. This project will install a picnic shade structure, picnic tables, fencing, concrete and d raina ,2'e structures. WORK IN DESIGN: I. FY96-97 Pave~nent Management System: Staff ,'ett, rned the third plan check to the consultant on February 10th. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Je~rson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Rancho California Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire length of the project. C, instruction is anticipated to begin in June 1999 with an estimated completion date of August 1999. 3 moactrpt/cip/99/mar 2. Pujoi Street Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter: The consultant has completed the design survey and City staff is currently designing the project. 3. Street Name Sign Replacement - Phase I This project is currently being designed in-house. This project will replace existing street name signs in the Santiago Estates area with new plastic molded signs. 4. 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road The City Council approved the Consultant's contract at the February 9 meeting. This project will add one (1) southbound lane on the 1-15 Freeway and also widen the bridge over the Santa Gertrudis Creek at the southbound off:ramp. The consultant will provide a design to widen the northbound on-ramp from Winchester Road. Currently staff has a consultant designing the portion to add an auxiliary exit lane for the southbound I- 15 Freeway north of the Santa Gertrudis Creek. Once this design is completed, the plans will be submitted to Caltrans for approval and the inclusion into the current ramp-widening project. 5. 1-15 Southlmund Off-Ramp Widening at Rancho California Road The City Council approved the Consultant's contract at the February 9 meeting. This project will add one (1) southl,~und lane on the 1-15 Freeway. Currently the City has a consultant designing an auxiliary exit lane for the southbound i-15 Freeway just north of Rancho California Road. Once this design is complete the plans will be submitted to Caltrans for approval and inclusion into the current loop ramp-widening project. 6. Butterfield Stage Park Improvements This pro cot is currently being designed and is approximately 90% complete. This project will construct a basketball court near the existing parking lot. 7. Traffic Signals on Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road and at Pauba Road l)c,,igl~ is ct~mplete, and authorization to advertise tbr public bids is anticipate to be on the Ci.ty Council agenda 8. Old Town Southside Parking Lots The prqicct is currently being designed in-house. This project consists of two (2) proposed parking lots. One MII bc h~cated on the west side of Front Street just north of Second Street, and the other lot is located on the st ruth side of Fourth Street west of Front Street. Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail Undercro~,;in~ The prt,.icct design is now complete. This project will construct a bike trail in the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek under Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) bridge. 10. First Street Bridge Final construction drawings are completed; construction advertisement is scheduled for May 1999. 4 moactrpt/cip/99/mar :Z I- Z 0 o>0 ~Oi 0 ~ _1 ,T UUUU UUUU MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Acling Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: ~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: April 5, 1999 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - March, 1999 · mew The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of March, 1999. I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 67 B. Total signs installed 54 C. Total signs repaired 26 II. Ill. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons 3 1,500 50 IV. VI. VII. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 432 B. -0- New and repainted legends L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 370 19,400 16 3,598 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 27 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 38 service order requests for the month of February.1999. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 50 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March, 1999 was $ 29.481.35 compared to $ 21.958.00 for the month of Februerv. 1999. Account No. 5402 $ 24,270.25 Account No. 5401 $ 5,211.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - CC: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following i~rojects for the month of March, 1999 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE ~CO:NTRACTOR:~! TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CONSTR. Date: March 1, 1999 # 5401 Winchester at Roripaugh Emergency repairs to storm drain grates Date: March 3, 1999 # 5402 45584 Olympic Way TOTAL COST $ 391.00 Sidewalk remove and replace and root prune -~NTRACTOR: Date: March 3, 1999 BECKERENGINEERING 41419 Calle Tajos TOTAL COST $ 4,810.25 335 S.F. sidewalk remove and replace #5402 Date: March 10,1999 # 5402 Rancho California Road at Business Park Drive TOTAL COST i S 4,685.00 Remove and replace cross gutter Date: # 5401 March 30, 1999 Third and Sixth Street TOTAL COST s ~,: 95.,~0 Install new grates to inlet and outlet ends TOTAL COST $ 4,820.00 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March, 1999 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK ~IZE CONTRACTOR: L. WILLIAMS 'LANDSCAPE' .................................... ~ ........... Date: March, 1999 Project #FY-98-99-01 Citywide R,O.W. Tree Trimming # 5402 :CONTRACTOR::~i: i Date: March 3, 1999 # 5402 Date: Class One - Trimmed 167 R.O.W. Trees TOTAL COST $ 10,755.00 RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT * : : De Portola0 east of Butterfield Mechanical R.O.W. weed abatement Stage Road TOTAL COST $ 1,82 "~ Date: # TOT;,_ COST TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT//5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT//5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 5,211.00 $ 24,270.25 0 ~,,~ Z Z Z C) C:) C:) c~m 0 O0 I',.- r, OZ LLIO 2Zn.' =~rn o--_ Oa. ¢m. cm. ~l. N ~- o 0 m o~ _1 ¢t I-- o 03/02/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/11/99 03/16/99 03/18/99 03/19/99 03/22/99 03/25/99 03, ~ ~ '99 03/25/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 LOCATION BUTTERFIELD STAGE AT PAUBA MARGARITA AT SOLANA MARGARITA AT DESERT SHADOWS MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD CABOOSE ON PUJOL BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ON PUJOL MARGAKITA AT STONEWOOD MARGARITA AT RAMSEY COURT RANClIO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ 28816 PUJOL KANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TAJO LONG VALLEY AT ROANOAK KANCliO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT COSMIC EMPIRE CREEK '. 3oi 2-,~ PECHANGA LONG VALLEY WASli CliANNEL WORK COMPLETED REMOVED 8 REMOVED 10 REMOVED 2 REMOVED 4 REMOVED 87 REMOVED 26 REMOVED 2 REMOVED 8 REMOVED 2 REMOVED 84 REMOVED 327 REMOVED 3 REMOVED 1 REMOVED 14 REMOVED 20 REMOVED 3,000 S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFIT1 S.F. OF GRAFFIT""',,~ S.F. OF GRAFFHt S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GKAFFiTi S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 3,598 TOTAL LOCATIONS 16 N\TEMEC_F8201XDATA'~DEPTS~W~,dAINTAIN\WKCMpLTD~GRAFFH'p,.~y, MARCH99.DOC CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 03/01/99 03/02/99 03/02/99 03/02/99 03/04/99 03/05/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/11/99 03/15/99 03/15/99 03/17/90 03/17/99 03/17/99 03/18/89 03/18/89 03/19/99 03/23/99 03/23/99 03/25/99 03/26/99 OLD TOWN JOSEPH ROAD AT RITA WAY CALLE GIRASOL AT RIVERTON YNEZ AT CAR DEALERSHIP CORTE BACARRO AT PAUBA VIA TORRES AT CORTE PARADO YNEZ SOUTH OF PREECE WALCOTT AT KLARER DEL REY AT VIA NORTE YNEZ AT FORD DEALER PAUBA AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE YNEZ AT CAR DEALERSHIPS CORTE SOLADAD AT VIA ASTURIAS VIA RENATE AT VIA LA VIDA YNEZ AT CAR DEALERSHIP YNEZ AT FORD DEALER SPARKMAN SCHOOL 2':.EKE P. E7'CNDEL~, NICHOLAS BETWEEN JOSEPH AND VvTNCHESTER OLD TOWN WALCOTT CORRIDOR RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HOPE WAY MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN WORK COMPLETED. INSTALLED 45 BLUE R.P.M.'S REPLACED R-1 "DAMAGED" REPLACED W-6-15 "DAMAGED' REPLACED 2 TYPE "K" T.C. REPLACED R-1 T.C. REPLACED R-1 T.C. REPLACED R-81 COMBO T.C. INSTALLED 2 W-7 REPLACED W-17 "MISSING" REPLACED R-10 2 TYPE "K .... T.C." REPLACED W-17 "MISSING" REPLACED 2 R-10 4 TYPE "K" "T.C." REPLACED REPLACED R-1 "FADED" REPLACED R-10 2 TYPE "K .... T.C." REPLACED R-10 2 TYPE "K" "T.C" INSTALLED (3) W-63 R-I "F~,DED'' PEPLACED REPLACED 13 R-81-R26D COMBOS INSTALLED (4) R-26 B REPLACED 26 CARSONITES REPLACED R-7 &TYPE "K" "T.C. REPLACED W-41 T.C. R:hVLMNTAINY~IVKCMPLTD\SIGNSX~gXMAR. CH .99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 03/01/99 03/02/99 03/02/99 03/02/99 03/04/99 03/05199 03/09/99 03/09/99 03109199 03/11/99 03/15/99 03 / 15/99 33 :l 7/oc 03/17~99 03/17/99 03/18/89 03/18/89 03/19/99 03/23/99 03/23/99 03/25/99 03/26/99 OLD TOWN JOSEPH ROAD AT RITA WAY CALLE GIRASOL AT RIVERTON YNEZ AT CAR DEALERSHIP CORTE BACARRO AT PAUBA VIA TORRES AT CORTE PARADO YNEZ SOUTH OF PREECE WALCOTT AT KLARER DEL REY AT VIA NORTE YNEZ AT FORD DEALER PAUBA AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE YNEZ AT CAR DEALERSHIPS CORTE SOLADAD AT VIA ASTURIAS VIA RENATE AT VIA LA VIDA YNEZ AT CAR DEALERSHIP YNEZ AT FORD DEALER SPARKMAN SCHOOL NICHOLAS BETWEEN JOSEPH AND WINCHESTER OLD TOWN WALCOTT CORRIDOR RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HOPE WAY MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN INSTALLED 45 BLUE R.P.M.'S REPLACED R-1 "DAMAGED" REPLACED W--6-15 "DAMAGED" REPLACED 2 TYPE "K" T.C. REPLACED R-1 T.C. REPLACED R - 1 T.C. REPLACED R-81 COMBO T.C. INSTALLED 2 W-7 REPLACED W-17 "MISSINg_ REPLACED R-10 2 TYPE "K .... T.C." REPLACED W-17 "MISSING" REPLACED 2 R-10 4 TYPE "K" "T.C." REPLACED ~:,-. "DAMAGED' REPLACED R-1 "FADED" REPLACED R-10 2 TYPE "K .... T.C." REPLACED R-10 2 TYPE "K .... T.C" INSTALLED (3) W-63 :';_:'L,~"'E: ,." -: -'F~,DED" REPLACED 13 R-81-R26D COMBOS INSTALLED (4) R-26 B REPLACED 26 CARSONITES REPLACED R-7 &TYPE "K" "T.C.-~ REPLACED W-41 T., R:XMAINTAIN~WKCMPL"fD\SIGNSxSl~4ARCH 59 LOCATION 03/29/99 LEENA WAY AT MEADOWS 03/30/99 FRONT AT 1sr 03/30/99 STATION #84 · ' WORK COMPLETED REPLACED W-17 W-31 TYPE N INSTALLED 2-R- 1 -A REPLACED 2 SW21B MISSING TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 67 54 26 R:'uMAINTAINXWKCMPLTD\SIGNSX98XMARCH.99 DATE RECEIVED 03/01/~ 03101199 03/01/99 03/01/99 03/02/99 03/03/99 03/03/99 03/03/99 03104199 03/05/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 0309 ee 03/09/99 03/11/99 03/11/99 03/18/99 03/22/99 03/22/99 03/23/99 03/26/99 03/30/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 LOCATION 45616 CLASSIC WAY 39450 LONG RIDGE DRIVE 43399 CALLE DE VELARDO 30951 SAWGRASS COURT LA COLINA ROAD AT CALLE OLVERA 42056 HUMBER 30900 WHITE ROCKS CIRCLE 30120 VILLA ALTURAS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ 30559 IRON BARK COURT 43325 CALLE NACIDO 43372 VIA ANGELES 43484 FASSANO CHARDONNAY HILLS 43737 BUCKEYE ROAD 42234 AGENA 30915 CORTE ARROYO VISTA 43977 GATEWOOD WAY WINCHESTER ROAD AT RORIPAUGH 29585 CALLE VIOLETA 29585 CALLE VIOLETA =1~725 CALLE MEDUSA TIERRA VlSTA TIERRA VISTA 43480 CORTE DURAZO 31470 PASEO GOLETA 33233 VIA CHAPPARO REQUEST DAMAGED STREET SIGNS POTHOLES DEBRIS REMOVAL TREE TRIMMING TREE TRIMMING SIDEWALK REPAIR ROOT PRUNING TREE TRIMMING SIGN REPAIR ROOT PRUNING CATCH BASIN CLEANING DEBRIS PICK-UP STANDING WATER CAPPING OF STREETS TREE TRIMMING ROOT PRUNING TREE TP, IMNIL';C ROOT PRUNING SINK HOLE TREE TRIMMING TREE TRIMMING DFL~,IN CLEANING POTHOLE POTHOLE SINK HOLE TREE TRIMMING TREE PLANTING TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS DATE WORK COMPLETED 03/01/99 03/01/99 03/01/99 03/01/99 03/01/99 03/03/99 03/03/99 03/03/99 03/04/99 03/05/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/08/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/11/99 03/11/99 03/18/99 03 / 19/99 03/22/99 03/22/99 03/23/99 03/26/99 03/30/99 27 R:XMAINTAINXWKCMPLTD\SORSx99XMARCH.99.DOC DATE 03/03/99 03/04/99 03/05/99 03/08/99 03/09/99 03/10/99 03/11/99 03/15/99 03/25/99 03/26/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 LOCATION ~ AREA #3 AREA #3 AREA #3 AREA #3 & #4 AREA #4 AREA AREA #4 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CITYWIDE "RAIN" AREA #2 WORK COMPLETED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED 24 CATCH BASINS 31 CATCH BASINS 13 CATCH BASINS 73 CATCH BASINS 63 CATCH BASINS 66 CATCH BASINS 33 CATCH BASINS 25 CATCH BASINS 27 CATCH BASINS 15 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 370 R:'uMAi~ITAfN~/KCMPLETD\CATCHBASXg~MARCH.99 :'DATE 03/01/99 03/02/99 03/03/99 03/08/99 03/09/99 03/09/99 03/11/99 03/16/99 03/17/99 03/23/99 03/24/99 03/29/99 AREA #3 AREA #3 AREA #3 AREA #3 & 4 AREA #4 OLD TOWN AREA #4 AREA #4 AREA #4 AREA #4 AREA #4 AREA #4 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 'LOCATION REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED WORK COMPLETED 37 LEGENDS 27 LEGENDS 13 LEGENDS 42 LEGENDS 41 LEGENDS 14 LEGENDS 15 LEGENDS 40 LEGENDS 38 LEGENDS 72 LEGENDS 41 LEGENDS 52 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 432 -0- \\TEMEC_FS201XDATA~DEFrS~W'~tAII~rrA1N~WKCMPLTD~'FR.1pINGX99~MARCH .99DOC CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION 03/01/99 03/02/99 03/03/99 03/04/99 03/16/99 03/17/99 03/18/99 /,,~/22/99 ~3/99 03/24/99 03/29/99 03/30/99 ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 SCOPE OF WORK SOLANA EAST OF MARGARITA SOLANA EAST OF MARGARITA LA SERENA AND NICHOLAS RAINBOW CANYON ROAD SOLANA WAY AT RYCREST RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD ~ MEADOWS PKWAY 28822 FRONT STREET 42221 6TM STREET PALA ROAD AT VIA GILBERTO NICHOLAS ROAD 41975 4TM STREET VIA LA VIDA JEF~ERSf'>.'v AVENUE AT MANPO'~VER " S~F.; TOTAL TONS CONSTRUCTED 95 L.F.A.C. BERM 95 3.5 CONSTRUCTED 95 L.F.A.C. BERM 80 3.5 A.C. OVERLAY 57 2.5 FILL POTHOLES 42 TEMP. A.C. R & R A.C. 170 5.5 R & R A.C. 116 6.5 R & R A.C. 165 6 O.L. A.C. 179 3.5. R & R A.C. 180 5.5 FILL POTHOLES 112 2.5 R & R A.C. 110 3.5 R & R A.C. 122 4 R&R A.C 'L'2 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS TOTAL TONS 1,500 50 R:x,M/dNTAINJWKCMPLTDXASPHALT. RPR~98~MARCH .99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 !DATEi~i ::~ ~ i!~ :!Z~ ~ i~!!:~i~i~ ~: ~:i~ LOCATION 03/11/99 DEL REY AT AVENIDA VERDE 03/26/99 MAROARITA AT RUSTIC OLEN 03/30/99 YNEZ AT CORONADO world: COMeL T :n TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED \XTEMEC_F$201XDATA~DEFr$~W'xMAINTAIIq~WKCMPLTD\TREES\99\MARCH99.DOC CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF MARCH, 1999 DATE 03/01/99 03/16/99 03/22/99 03/29/99 03/30/99 03/30/99 03/30/99 03/31/99 LOCATION VIA LOBO CHANNEL AREA #1 DIAZ AT WINCHESTER DE PORTOLA SOUTH OF YNEZ FRONT AT 1s'r STREET FRONT AT STAMPEDE FOURTH STREET 3aD STREET WORK COMPLETED ABATED ABATED ABATED ABATED A,BATED A,BATED ABATED ABATED 8,240 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 325 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 40 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 3,395 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 1,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 1,100 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 4,800 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 500 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED R:'~MAINTAIN~WKCMPLTD\WEEDSx99\MARCH.99.DOC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City ManagedCity Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager~ April 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of March, 1999. Economic Development Jim O'Grady artended the CALED Economic Development Conference in Monterey from March 31 - April 2. The conference offers informational sessions on economic development strategies, case studies and resource materials. Jim O'Grady & Grant Yates attended the EDC business retention meeting on March 4TM. Grant Yates and Allie Kuhns attended site visits to Hudson RCI and Endar on March 4tn. They also attended a site visit with Western Eagle on March 29TM. Staff met with the Southwest Riverside County EDC on March 2"° and the 23r~ to go over marketing/planning issues, leads and funding. Jim O'Grady attended the March 11 lh EDC workshop facilitated by EDC consultant, Steve Harding. Executive Management and several members from the Police and Fire Departments toured the Guidant facilities. The primary purpose was to better understand Guidant's operations on an operational level and also form an emergency response standpoint. ~,2:f-'~-_- :2 .... :e:- '_-- '.'_:-;' .,.';F- ...-._= s-ess =_:.:e-2-:s5 st_-' ~'~3 ~2 ] 2" the Southwest. Riverside County Career Fair that will be heici on Saturciay, April 10'~ at Temecuia Middle School. Staff worked with the Chamber of Commerce on the State of the City Address that was held on March 4~h. The event was a success with 370 in attendance. The City held a broker's meeting with Temecula Valley brokers and a few EDC Board Members on March 18th. Bob Lemmons, Director of Engineering, and Perry Louck, Controller, with Rancho California Water District gave presentations on their organization, services and fee structure. Ted Haring, Public Information Officer, and Warren Back, Customer Service Officer, with Eastern Municipal Water District also gave presentations on their organization, services and fee structure. There was a question/answer period at the conclusion of the meeting. The water districts distributed materials to the attenddes. Staff attended the IEEP Community Partners Meeting on March 25th at the City of Colton. Janice Moore gave a presentation on the IEEP's Workforce Development Program. IEEP's marketing activities were discussed including their upcoming Inland Empire cable segment. Staff attended the Murrieta Temecula Group meeting on March 5th and met with a number of local and regional community members. Council approved Toybox Creations for participation in the Employee Relocation Assistance Program. Staff has provided information to Toybox regarding this program. Media IEEP is working with Tri-Comm Video Production on an Inland Empire cable segment. Temecula companies including Guidant, International Rectifier, Zone Automation and wine country were selected to be featured. The show, Strategic Business Reports, will be shown on the East Coast markets to local cable and local broadcast stations. It will begin airing in June and will run for a three-month period'. Western Association News April issue included a section on California's Inland Empire. The publication is sent to meeting managers, destination management companies, Convention & Visitor's Bureaus and association executives that schedule meetings for corporations. The section called Temecula: A Vintage Valley highlighted our tourism attractions, events and hotels. Tourism Jeff Kurtz with Prime Outlets in Lake Elsinore contacted the City for information on Temecula's tourism activities and events. The City prepared material and sent slides to them to incorporate in a regional tourism presentation which will be given to Japanese tourists. The City supplied slides and tourism brochures to Destination Temecula for "ru2Dervv~'-e's annual retreat f~ ..... pS:F, eT.S WeFfi: OU[ [O Tupperware represema~ives. The qualifying agents will get to spend a day in Temecula on August 21st. Activities planned include wine country tours, scavenger hunt in Old Town, and music, dancing and a buffet dinner at the Stampede. The expected attendance is 400. Those agents that do not qualify will still have received the Temecula information and may visit on their own another time, Staff attended an Inland Empire Tourism Council meeting on March 8th to finalize the arrangements for the California Travel Market (CTM) Tourism Show. Staff supplied the Chamber with literature and raffle prizes for CTM. 2 Staff met with Carol Popejoy-Hime, to review City sponsorship items for '99 Balloon & Wine Festival (i.e. City ad, mayor's message in the program, souvenirs, tickets, etc.). Executive management and City Council will be receiving invitations to the Balloon & Wine Sponsor Appreciation Dinner on June 3"~ at the Embassy Suites. Media Arthur Yellen, publisher of RVing America publication, contacted the City for current information on recreational and special events occurring in Temecula. This is a free, monthly RV newspaper with 36 - 40,000 copies distributed to over 817+ campgrounds in 10 western states. A press kit, calendar of events and other tourism information was sent. Travel writer Marilyn Hackett, Valley Living Magazine, will be visiting Temecula on May 16 & 17. She will be reviewing several restaurants in Temecula. The Chamber made arrangements. City staff assisted Old Town merchants in the media distribution of a press release on their Western Days event that will be held April 17 and 18. Staff prepared a media kit and information for LA Times travel writer Barbara Beckley. She visited Temecula on April 3 and 4. The Chamber handled the accommodations for her stay. Attachments: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Report Southwest Riverside County EDC Report Temecula Valley Film Council Report 3 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 April 9, 1999 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn: Attached please find the Monthly Activity. Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of March at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights · 12 businesses requested information on starting or relocatmg their business in Temecula. They received a business packet which includes demographic, relocation, housing, ~c. Committee Highlights 7no Tours. sin St:['-Ccrr_mi~ee has met its goal of having the HoteL:.%lotel indi~4dual & Group packages readv and in play by the end of March. Packages will range flora golf, wine country tours, hot air balloons, Old Town, spa, romantic get-away to rent-a-resort! The Touvlsm Committee and staff is coordinating an upcoming Fam Tour of Destination Management Companies to tour Temecula on April 20. Embassy Suites and Temecula Creek Inn has donated hosting a welcome reception and luncheon. The Committee is seeking volunteers for the Balloon & Wine Festival City/Chamber Booth on May 1 & 2. Travel packets xvill be given to tourist visiting the festival. The One-page Street Mao is in its final Tac conm~rtee anct staff is currently working on the "Great Race" scheduled for June 19, 1999. This event will be great media coverage for the City of Temecula. Education Cormmittee: The Chamber has been contacted by Spaeth Design to particapate in a sto~' writing contest to be held by the Chamber in conjunction with the school district. The winner's story will be told by an automated story-telling bear located in a play area of the Promenade Mall. · The Ways & Means Committee is pleased tO announce the successful start of the 1999 Team Member of the Year Award Luncheon & Fashion Show to be held on Wednesday, April 21 at Embassy Suites Hotel. Sponsors for this rewarding event are; Diversified Temporary Services, Embassy Suites Hotel, Fallbrook National Bank, Norm Reeves Super Group and Rancho Springs Medical Center. Thus far the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce has received twen.ty-nine nominees. Preparations have been initiated for the 1999 Pageant, to be held Saturday, August 28 at Temecula Middle School. Monthly meetings will continue through July with bi-monthlv and weekly meeting sessions during August. Sign-ups will be accepted beginning mid-April. Publicit>., will be done via, flyer, press releases and Temecala Today! newsletter. Due to inclement weather The Chainrock golf Classic, sold out event, is set for April 5, 1999 at Temecula Creek Inn. · Local Business Promotions Committee has instituted preparations for the second Success Seminar Series set June 8, 1999. "Unleash Your Marketing Power"! Is the topic which Mr. Alain Jourdier will present, addressing particularly to Temecula Valley businesses. Alain Jourdier a long time Temecula Valley resident, will share his insights ind practical ideas from his many years of marketing experience. He has won numerous marketing awards for excellence and speaks nationally on relationship marketing. Little Professor Book Companv is the presenting sponsor for this second Success Seminar Series. Marketing of the semina; has been implemented via flyers, press releases and in the Temecnla Todav! Newsletter. Hans are also underway for the "Shop Temecula First' 'because it just mikes Sense" June campaign. The Press-Enterprise is June's campaign sponsor. Sign-ups have been announced via press releases and in the Temecula Today! newsletter. Monthly meetings will be held at the Chamber office. Govermnent Action News: Supervisor Buster is scheduled to speak at the nex~ Government Action Committee meeting on April 19, 1999. At the last meeting, D. Larrv Francis reported on insurance companies taking a loss on HMO's which will result in a 12% increase in ~nsurance costs. Membership Committee Ambassadors attended 10 ribbon cuttings in March. In the month of March the Chamber referred over 16,600 businesses through mailings, e-mails and walk-in visitors. The chamber notifies each member via referral postcard of monthly referrals. The Membership Committee is organizing a "May Membership Madness Month". Max, is dcsigmated for all Chamber members to sponsor one ne~v member for the month. The Ccrn..mirt.-e is pr:Darin~ for a New M~mbcr Reception on A~ril 1_~. 1999. AD n~,v,' i:ic,'lli)cr~< it, :llc last quarter will be attending. This event ts a oppormm~' to explain their business and to meet Staff, Board of Directors and the Committee. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 250 Cit).' Maps to Forest City. for distribution to prospective tenants. · 200 Temecula Brochures, 250 Winery Brochures, 100 Visitor Guides, 160 Old Town Maps and 161 Travel Packets to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center for distribution to visitors. · 200 Old Town Maps to Wilderness Lakes Preserve for distribution to visitors. · 100 Travel Packets, 100 Old Town Maps and 100 Winery Brochures to Tucalota Springs for distribution to guests at the campground. · 100 Visitor Guides to Stewart Cellars Winery for distribution to tourists. · 100 Visitor guides and 100 Winery Brochures to Rosa 's Cantina for distribution to tourists in Old Town. · 100 Old Town Maps, 100 Visitor Guides and 100 Winery Brochures to Tom Miller for distribution to the Native Sons of Golden West touring Temecula. · 80 Travel Packets to One Song for distribution to tourists in Old Town. · 50 Ci~, Maps, 50 Temecula Brochures and 50 relocation packets to International Recti~er for employees relocating to Temecula. · 50 Travel Packets, 50 Old Tow~/Maps and 50 Winery Brochures to Circolo All for a tour in Temecula. · 50 Winery Brochures and l0 Relocation packets to Redhawk for distribution to new home buyers. · 50 Temecula Brochures to the San Gabriel Valley Junior Women's Club attending a conference at Embassy Suites. · 50 Visitor Guides to Embassy Suites for distribution to guests. · 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Rosa's Cantma for distribution to tourists in Old Town. · 50 Visitor Guides to Vina de Lestonnac for visitors at the retreat. · 30 Temecula Brochures to J.T.'s Winery, Trail Rides for distribution to customers. · 30 Winery Brochures to Meeting Manager for distribution to guests. · 25 Visitor guides to Union 76 for distribution to tourists. · 25 Travel Packets distributed to tourists at TVCC's office. Activity Report · Overall Tourism phone calls are up 19.41 percent from last 3'ear. · Overall phone calls are up 118.64 percent from last year. E-Mail requests: 94 Aiso attached are the Meeting Minutes for the, Education, Ways & Means, Local Business Promotions, Government Action, Membership Committees and "How did you hear about Temecula'?" report. If you have any question regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely. Alice Sullivan Presidcnt/CEO Mayor Steven J. Ford Mayor Pro Tern Jeffcry E. Stone Councilman Jeff Comerchero Councilman Karel F. Lindemans Councilman Ronald H. Roberts Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary' Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolmck, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER CHAMBER REFERRALS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION ? RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT For March, 1999 Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month Total Year-To-Date 458 110 484 1310 2,362 225 58 2,228 16,639 118 21,630 1428 360 1806 3,157 6,751 597 188 5,523 33,508 408 40,224 175 97 52 776 192 54 1071 82 2,499 158 9 0 79 0 0 0 0 246 972 368 213 2,374 521 170 2,932 208 7,758 221 !11 120 452 633 329 361 1,323 10 30 54 94 THIS MONTH 21,630 2,499 452 94 55 71 184 5i0 YEAR-TO-DATE 33,336 4,580 894 404 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber February, 1998 February, 1999 PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 452 458 Calendar of Events 117 110 Special Events 491 484 * General Information 918 1,310 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,978 2,362 RELOCATION 219 225 DEMOGRAPHICS 83 58 CHAMBER 1,689 2,228 CHAMBER REFERRALS 5,815 16,639 MISCELLANEOUS 109 118 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 9,893 21,630 Percentage Increase 1.33 -5.98 -1.43 42.70 19.41 2.74 -30.12 31.91 186.14 8.26 118.64 WALK-INS TOURISM 263 175 -33.46 * CALENDAR OF EVENTS 149 97 -34.90 * SPECIAL EVENTS 59 52 -11.86 * GENERAL INFORMATION 727 776 6.74 RELOCATION 206 192 -6.80 * DEMOGRAPHICS 129 54 -58.14 CHAMBER 1005 1071 6.57 * MISCELLANEOUS 87 82 -5.75 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 225 246 9.33 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,850 2,745 -3.68 MAILINGS TOURISM 263 221 -15.97 ~ELOCATION 1:2 I -~ I -I 5 DEMOGRAPHICS 131 120 -8.40 TOTAL MAILINGS 526 452 -14.07 E-MAIL TOURISM N/A 16 N/A RELOCATION N/A 15 N/A MISCELLANEOUS N/A 27 N/A Economic Development Corporation ,~mtbu 'est Rit 'erside 6~un/J April 9, 1999 Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: EDC Contract - Activity Summary The following highlights the activities of the EDC during the month of March: Business Development The EDC responded to two requests for information from IEEP. One project from a "high-end" financial call center would garner 600 customer service employees if sited in this area. The other project from a metal manufacturer required a 10,000 to 20,000 sf building and no employee hire count was given. A request for information for Project Inverness CATAC was received but not responded to as it required land adjacent to a runway of a FAA designed Category 1 airport. French Valley does not meet this design criteria. Three inquiries for information were responded to as a result of ads placed in site selection magazine. A food ingredient manufacturer, a manufacturer of commerc',al filtration systems and a manufacturer of musical instruments received packages of general information about the area and specific site locations. A Utah builder of multi-family units was sent general information and a site selection consultant from Australia also received general material about the region. Marketinq Outreach sponsoreo Dy Temecu~a CONNECT on March 9tn. The speaker at the luncheon was Mr. Charles W. Taylor, Manager of Trade Finance at First National Bank San Diego, CA. Mr. Taylor took the group through several scenarios of creative solutions for financing exports and other related business transactions. EDCSWRC was a Supporter of the first Inland Empire Civic Dialogue held on Thursday, March 11, 1999 at both campuses of Mr. San Jacinto College. The interactive symposium brought together civic leaders and others to discuss health I>n-t < )l'lict' I~;x 13N,"¢ * 'l'cnlccula.(ZA 9259.-;-1388 · ()fficc 909/69=,-513() · F,-LX 909/(~9%-5126 Jim O'Grady April 15, 1999 Page Two cam issues with our elected representatives in Washington D.C. and Sacramento. These issues are of critical importance to employers in Southwest Riverside County. Benefit programs for employees rely on comprehensive planning from both our national and state representatives. Future dialogues are planned on a variety of topics effecting our community. The general meeting of the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturer's Council was held on March 10th. Robert Klemme, managing partner of CEO Strategic Solutions, a boutique investment banking firm focusing on small to mid cap companies was the featured speaker. He discussed what his firm and Core 21 are doing in the Inland Empire to assist business, both start-up and those needing technological assistance to develop and expand their operations. Business Relations The Business Relations Committee is on track with their goals for visitations. Staff continues to assist the committee with documentation and preparation of the visit materials and research regarding the companies to be visited. Discussion continues concerning the planning of the "Career Fair", to be held on April 10u~ . The goal of 30 exhibitors has been established. A tour of Endar was conducted on March 9th. Endar has expanded twice since the company was established in Temecula. Administration/Oraanization Staff has continued to assist the Board of Directors and Executive Commfttee in the stra~e ~c p~anning process. Steve Harding conducted the first workshop on March 11t~ pursuant to his contract with EDCSWRC. Staff continues to attend the One Stop Career Center planning process. Staff is awaiting budgetary documentation from the County of Riverside before bringing the item before the Board of Directors of EDC for approval. It is anticipated that information will be disseminated to the Board before the scheduled April 28th Board meeting. T~;~ ~^~a, ~=~ +~_ .~:.~,-.~ -; :--~,,..,i,,t~= mOn,~ -,: ~^-.-C~ Please ~ S'- _ .. .% for., ,~ , , ~ .... %~c. ,. call if ~nere are questions concerning ~n~s repo~. :Judi Staats ~xecutive Director TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT MARCH 1999 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Fred Hubcr, President; Brian Padberg. Vice- President: Judi Staats, Treasurer; Maggi Allen, Secretary; Shed Davis; Steve Phelps: Penny Rivera: and Sunny Thomas. The Business of the Film Council We are moving into a temporary home in the EDC offices in Temecula. Judi Staats got authorization for the Film Council to move into the EDC offices at their meeting in this month. We will continue to use Personal Secretary' and volunteer staffing to handle telephone requests and mailings. Press releases were sent to the major local newspapers announcing that the auditions for Temecula Talent 3~lowcase '99 will be held on April 10 and 11 and that audition appointments can be made by calling the Film Council. Film Council telephone inquiries are being handled effectively bv a voice mail answering system. During the month of March we received 48 calls - 9 - for production and location information. 14 - for Film Festival information. 18 - for Talent Showcase information. 7 - TVFC business. Fred Huber. Judi Staats and Maggi Allen met with Gloria Wolnick. Jim O'Gradv and Jeff Comerchero to discuss our role in supporting the Film Festival efforts and to get sponsorship approval from the City of Temecula Bert Dovan. a local film producer with Dovan lownsend Enterprises. returned to Tcmecula xvith his script for a film project scheduled for this summer. The budget is $4 million. There xvill be 28 filming days. tentatively in Old Toxxn. Sage Rd. offHwv 79 South. some areas of V~;arncr Springs and 2 residential areas. Cast and cre~v will be housed in Temecula. Jo Moulton introduced Ben Dovan to Brian Padbcr~ and toured Stt,.dioMamc Prc~d;~ctio,,:s their production x~'ork allowing all production to stay in Tcmccula. Kate Carmichael of American Eagle Outfitters spent 4 days in Temecula using Embassy Suites as her base for scouting locations for their latest project. Ms. Carmichael used the TVFC production guide as one of her resources for locating her production needs locally. The Stampede was used as the location for a new TV pilot (yet to be named) which was shot in 4 days. The production staff indicated that they would like to return to Temecula for another project. W'e will keep in contact with them. We will continue to support the daily management of ~lmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area w4thin the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opponumties and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfull3'. Maggi Allen Secretan' APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager%~,, Apd120,1999 Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department in the month of March 1999. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 32 new applications for administrative and other minor cases and home occupations and 8 new applications for public hearings during the month of March. The new public headng cases are as follows: Change of Zone 1 Conditional Use Permit 1 Minor Ccnc.;~:ional Use Permit 3 Development Plans (over 10,000 sf) 3 Pre-applications * Childtime Childrens Center- Pre-Application for new 8,000 sq. ~. child day care center on southwest side of Nicolas Road near the intersection with Roripaugh Road. The pre- application meeting has been scheduled for April 21, 1999. -, ~-,~52.:c.w-v~ecv GcTf 2,;~.rse - A F;e :r-p',;c~:,::n pGc, KE2e r,;z Seen recently suDrnit~ed. Status of Fast Track Projects The City's award-winning Fast Track process provides a way for major businesses relocating to or expanding in Temecula to get their facilities constructed and occupied in the shortest possible time. The current Fast Track projects are as follows: * Bostik - construction in the Westside Business Centre has been completed. , Moving and Storage company relocation on Zevo Drive. - The relocation of an existing business to a new 14,600 square foot building. This project is currently under construction R:WIONTHLY. RP'F,1999~March 99.doc 1 Burkey Machine & Tool - Development Plan for new 16,000 sq. ~. machine and tool facility with 27 employees at the northeast comer of Winchester Road and Colt Court. The Fast Track schedule was approved at a preliminary meeting on Apdl 6, 1999. The anticipated Planning Commission headng date is for June 16, 1999. Status of Maior Proiects Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and get the following cases ready for public hearing before the Community Development Director or Planning Commission: Rebel Rent's new facility on Winchester Road in the Westside Business Center. Staff is awaiting second resubmittal from the applicant. Several of staffs original comments need to be addressed from the original DRC comments. A new 11,300 square foot speculative commercial building on Enterprise Circle South. Staff is waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant based upon staffs DRC comments. Rancho Community Church expansion on Vallejo Avenue. This project may require a focused environmental impact report to enable the City to effectively deal with the potential impacts associated with this project. Tentative Parcel Map 28627, the Margarita Canyon Property. Staff is waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant based upon staffs comments on the applicanrs most recent proposal. Wolf Valley Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Repod: A comment letter was mailed to the applicant. Staff is awaiting resubmittal from the applicant. A 28-1ot tract map on Via La Vida east of Calle Palmas, Tentative Tract Map 29036. Staff is still waiting for a re-submittal addressing the comments raised the DRC meeting. The expansion of Milgard into a new 108,000 square foot building in the Westside Business Center. This prqiect ,has been scheduled for the Apdl 4, 1999 Planning Commissi,:,", (This project represents the retention (and expansion) of business that is currently operating in the City.) Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Staff has received re- submittal and is reviewing to determine if the Draft EIR can be circulated for public review and comment. Padtic Gulf Properties - A development of a 244 unit senior apartment complex with two and three story Duiiciing on an 8.13 ac-: ::t !'- ':;'5din..: s _"- ~ne:ai Dian A":en:,."r, ent and Change of Zone. Located on the northeast comer of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. Planning Commission had concerns with the proposed zoning and is being continued off-calendar to allow time to consider further changes. Endnitas Corporate Center Two LLC - Development Plan to construct a 32,000 square foot speculative office, warehouse and manufacturing building on two parcels (0.94 acres/parcel) totaling 1.88 acres. Located on the south side of Rio Nedo, approximately 1300' southwest of the intersection of Tierra Alta Way and Rio Nedo. Was approved by the Planning Commission on March 17, 1999. R:%MONTH LY. RP'I'%1999V~larch 99.doc MCA - Development Plan for a 7,000 square foot retail building (formerly Blockbuster). Locate in the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center at the northeast comer of Winchester Road and Margadta Road. Scheduled for Director Headng on April 15, 1999. Winston Tires - Conditional Use Permit to design, construct and operate a 5,310 square foot tire sales and installation, automotive service and repair facility. Located at 40385 Winchester Road, within the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center at the northeast comer of Margadta Road and Winchester Road. The second set of revised plans have been submitted and are currently under review. Clayton Hill, DVM - Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the development of a veterinarian hospital on a .69 acre lot. Located on the south side of Winchester Road, west of Nicolas Road. Staff is still awaiting resubmittal. Chemicon Intemational, Inc. - Development Plan to design, construct and operate an 85,056 square foot office/industrial, warehouse building. Located on the nodhwest comer of Business Park Drive and Single Oak Ddve. The project has been scheduled for the April 21, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. Lowe's Company- Development Plan to design, construct and operate a 129,462 square foot home improvement store with a 32,981 square foot garden area. Located on the southeast comer of Winchester and Margarita Roads. This item is scheduled for the April 7, 1999 Planning Commission hearing. GMC Building - Development Plan for new 19,000 sq. ft. light industrial spec building on the north side of Rio Nedo, between Via Industda and Tierra Alta Way. It has been scheduled for Development Review Committee on April 22, 1999. Richmond Amedcan Homes has submitted applications to construct 249 home in the Crowne Hill development east of Butterfield Stage Road. The Director Hearing has been scheduled for Apdl 22, 1999. The following Mall Out-Lot developments that have been submitted as of April 15, 19gg: - TGI Fridays Restaurant, 6,400 square feet. - Barnes & Noble Booksellers, 23,000 square feet. - Krause's Sofa, 10,000 square feet. - Men's Warehouse, 10,000 square feet. - Burger King, 3,800 square feet. - Souplantation restaur.~nt. 7,!00 sauare fee*,. - Cr, :he Ec~raer rez.:a~.ran:, 7,552, s~..~:e Farmer Boy's Restaurant on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue is neadng completion. Small Business Assistance Roadrunners Roadhouse: Staff is working with the applicant on issues relating to the occupancy. The proposed signs have been taken to the Old Town Local Review Board. -k Palomar Hotel: The applicant is preparing a plan for the Old Town Local Review Board. R:~MONTHLY. RP~1999Wlarch 99.cloc Mad Madeline's: Advised owner/applicant as to Planning Department process and what will be necessary to obtain approval from the Old Town Local Review Board US Land: Met with owner to discuss options for a proposed outdoor remodel/repainting of an existing building and how to navigate through the Old Town Local Review Board. Special Event Permits , , , ~r , , , , Open Wheel Midget Auto Races at the Northwest Sports Complex One Ring Circus at the Northwest Sports Complex Kmart Kids Race Against Drugs Mountainview Community Church Multicultural Event Church of the Nazarene Easter Tent Vintage Motorcycle Races at the Northwest Sports Complex Westem Days in Historic Old Town Frontier Days Rodeo at the Northwest Sports Complex SPECIAL PROJECTS & LONG RANGE PLANNING ACTIVITIES The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities are as follows: The mitigsted Negative [Z)edaration for the NW SPorts Part< was distributed for public re": - v~ and comment. The comment penoo is scheduled to close April 18, 1999. The race proponents and City have been conducting noise analyses during the initial demonstration pedod. Old Town In Lieu Parking Program: Staff revised the earlier proposal and presented it for Council's consideration in December. Convention Center Study: A final draft of the Study was presented to the Economic :'ev~-::"~e~' ~,;::-c,~mmi:tee v,'-. :-- rec~mmenCed thaT. the matter be considered by the entire Council. Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: The consultant is currently gathering information to begin preparation of the Draft EIR. Staff is currently reviewing the consultant's initial submittals. Southside Spedtic Plan: Staff is preparing to revisit the draft Specific Plan and land use standards to determine if the conditions along the South Front Street corridor. R:~MONTHLY, RP'I~I 999Vdarch 99.doc