HomeMy WebLinkAbout012292 TTC Agenda AGENDA
TEMECULA TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TO BF HELD AT
VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AUDITORIUM
29915 Mira Loma Drive
January 22, 1992 - 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL:
COMMISSIONERS: Godnick, Guerriero, Johnson,
Roberts, Sander
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request
to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording
Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Minutes of December 18, 1991
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of December 18, 1991 as mailed.
2. Marie Callender's EntranCe on Rancho California Rd. Just East of Ynez Road
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Staff recommends installing a right turn lane for the westbound traffic;
installing a "NO U-TURN" sign at the easterly side of the intersection; and
relocating the "STOP" tegend and "STOP-BAR" for southbound traffic.
-1- pwOl\traffic\agda\92\0122 011592
General Plan Technical Subcommittee Appointments
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Commission appoint a representative to the General Plan Technical
Subcommittee.
American Automobile Association
4.1 Cathy Zaitz, District Manager of American Automobile Association, will hand
out traffic safety brochures.
"Speed Checked By Radar" Sians
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Staff recommends that the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommend
to the City Council the installation of "Speed Checked By Radar" signs.
Investiaation/Maintenance Report
RECOMMENDATION:
6, 1 Receive and File.
Traffic Engineer's Report
Commission Reports
Adjournment
-2- pw01\traffic\agda\92\0122 011592
ITEM NO. I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
HELD DECEMBER 18, 1991
A regular meeting of Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission was called to
order at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California at 7:00
PM, Chairman Ron Roberts presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Godnick, Guerriero, Johnson,
Roberts, Sander
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Also present were Transportation Engineer Scott Harvey, Police Sgt. Jim Domenoe
and City Clerk June Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None offered
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1 Minutes
Chairman Ron Roberts requested a correction to the minutes on page four, last
paragraph, should read "Recommend closure of the northern most driveway
exitinq Advanced Cardiovascular, to prevent U-turns to go north on Ynez."
Commissioner Guerriero requested that the word Christmas be capitalized on
page two.
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Godnick
to approve the minutes as corrected. The motion was unanimously carried.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Transportation Engineer Scott Harvey presented the staff report.
2/minutes.TTC/121891 1 12/26/91
Traffic and Transportation Commission Minutes
December 18, 1991
Commissioner Godnick asked when the speed limits signs on Rancho California
Road, east and west of Margarita Road will be posted. Scott Harvey advised
he would check on this and get back to Commissioner Godnick.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the monthly report will include counts when
they are completed. He also asked if staff has considered an S-curve sign for
Avenida Barca.
Scott Harvey advised that new sign making and installation equipment has been
ordered and that this type of sign will be considered when those capabilities are
available.
Commissioner Sander stated he feels the staff is to be commended for the
installation of reflectorized markers at those areas where the roads suddenly
narrow.
Chairman Roberrs questioned the solution to the sight distance problem at
Commerce Center/Via Montezuma. Mr. Harvey stated that painting of a red
curb has been ordered. Chairman Roberrs also suggested reinstailing the
double lines at the north entrance to the Target Center on Ynez Road.
Multi-Way Stop Sign at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca
Scott Harvey presented the staff report and advised that staff found that a
traffic crossing guard is warranted at this location. He further advised that the
School District is providing a crossing guard.
Commissioner Guerriero asked if this item is on the agenda at the request of a
single individual or a neighborhood petition.
Scott Harvey stated he believes the request was from a single citizen.
Commissioner Guerriero suggested that when requests to staff are the result
of only one individual's request, they should be handled by staff rather than
having to prepare an agenda report for the Commission and delay action until
the next commission meeting.
Scott Harvey informed the Commission that he is preparing a Warrant
Procedure for the Commission's review. He suggested that he could include
a procedure for responding to single requests for intersection control measures.
2/minutes,TTCI121891 2 12/26/91
Traffic and Transportation Commission Minutes
December18,1991
Commission Guerriero asked if there will be a four-way stop sign installed at
Meadows Parkway and Pauba Road. Mr. Harvey responded that this is going
to be presented to the Commission in the future because the School District is
asking for a Crossing Guard at that location which will also require installation
of a cross walk.
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commission Guerriero
to approve staff recommendation as follows:
3.1
Staff recommends not to install a Multi-Way Stop Sign at Margarita Road
and Avenida Barca.
The motion was unanimously carried.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
Transportation Engineer Scott Harvey presented a report dealing with the
entrance to the Target Center located on Rancho California Road adjacent to
the Marie Callander Restaurant. He outlined staff's recommendations for
moving the stop signs and stop bars closer to Rancho California Road and re-
stripping the west bound lanes of Rancho California Road as well as installation
of additional signage.
Commissioner Guerriero stated he feels the only safe solution is to close the
entrance to the center at that location.
Commissioner Johnson agreed with this opinion and suggested that the
property owners and others who oppose this action should be invited to
address the Commission.
Commissioner Guerriero requested that the subject be placed on the next
agenda.
Commission Sander suggested this might also be the appropriate time to look
at the matter of the stop lights on Ynez Road at the entrances of the Target
and the Tower Shopping Centers.
COMMISSIONERS REPORTS
Commissioner Guerriero stated that the Public Safety Commission will be
discussing the Avenida De La Reina situation at their December 19th meeting.
He suggested this might be more appropriately discussed at a joint meeting.
2/minutes,TTC/121891 3 12/26/91
Traffic and Transl~ortation Commission Minutes
December 18, 1991
Scott Harvey advised that the City Council has directed staff to bring this
matter back to them in March after completion of the six-month trial closure
that they ordered.
Commissioner Sander stated he has attended two meetings of the Portofino
and Martinique Homeowners Associations regarding the Assessment District
161 tax situation. He advised that some of the positive benefits of AD-161
construction projects are not known by the public. He was most concerned
about the signals at Winchester and Nicolas Roads and asked that this be
discussed on a future agenda.
Chuck Collins, Ranpac Engineering, representing Assessment District 161,
spoke to the Commission on this matter and advised that the Nicolas
Road/Winchester Road intersection has been separated from the rest of the
road projects because Calt'rans has said they will not approve any
improvements at that intersection until the project report is completed. He said
that the design for the signals at Margarita and at Nicolas are completed.
In response to a question from Commission Guerriero, Mr. Collins advised that
the widening of Margarita Road Extension is taking place,
Commissioner Johnson expressed his concerns with the back up of traffic at
La Serena at Margarita and suggested a double left turn off of La Serena onto
Margarita might be considered.
Commissioner Johnson also stated he has a problem understanding why the
speed limits on Rancho California Road at the Target Center are posted at 40
MPH when Ynez Road between Rancho California and Solana Way is posted at
45 MPH.
Commissioner Roberts stated that traffic speed surveys performed at both
locations showed the 40 MPH was warranted on Rancho California Road but
did not warrant the lower speed on Ynez.
In response to a question from Commissioner Sander, Sergeant Domenoe said
that speed limits can not be set based on "reasonableness" because the traffic
studies must justify the action of lowering the limits. He also advised that the
recent traffic statistics do not show any additional accident activity since the
speed limit has been raised and said he will prepare. a report on the statistics
for the Commission.
2/minutes.TTC/121891 4 12/26/91
Traffic and Transportation Commission Minutes
December 18, 1991
Sergeant Domenoe advised the Commission that January 1, 1992 will be the
implementation date for the motorcycle helmet law. He asked if the
Commission feels that any enforcement grace period should be allowed within
the City.
The Commission by unanimous consensus recommended that no grace period
be given.
Sergeant Domenoe also advised the Commission that the intersection of Diaz
and Winchester Roads is now complete and that left turns are no longer
permitted from the center lane of Winchester onto Diaz. He said re-stripping
is being done to inform the driving public.
Chairman Ron Roberts reported on the recent meeting of the Ynez Corridor CFD
88-12 stating that the bonds are ready for sale and start dates are anticipated
for March or April 1992. He also reported that the Water District will be
installing a water line down the center of Ynez concurrent with the road
widening.
Chairman Roberts also expressed concern that the Public Safety Commission
is looking at the Avenida De La Reina question prior to the expiration of the City
Council's time trial period. He requested that staff provide the Commission
with a report of the results of that meeting,
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero,
to adjourn the meeting at 8:33 PM, to a regular meeting to be held on
Wednesday, January 22, 1992 at 7:00 PM at the Vail Elementary School,
29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, CA. The motion was unanimously carried.
Ronald Roberrs, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
2/minutes.TTC/121891 5 12/26/91
ITEM NO. 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Traffic & Transportation Commission
Scott Harvey, Traffic/Engineering Technician
January 22, 1992
Traffic Study at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and
Marie Callender's Entrance
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that a right turn lane be installed for westbound vehicles on
Rancho California Road. This right turn lane would be exclusively for entering Marie
Callender's entrance. The attached diagram shows the recommended signing and
striping.
Install a R-17 (No "U" Turn) sign of the back of the "Keep Right" sign on the easterly
nose of the island facing westbound traffic on Rancho California Road.
Remove existing "Stop" and "Stop-Bar" on the Marie Callender's access and repaint
as shown on Figure 3.
The installation of traffic signals is not recommended as it would deter traffic flow on
Rancho California Road.
Field observations found that since the signals to the east are in operation, additional
gaps are now provided for left turn movements.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The intersection of Rancho California Road and Marie Caliender's Entrance is controlled by a
Stop Sign, with traffic stopping at Marie Callender's for Rancho California Road. Figure 1
illustrates the condition diagram which shows the existing signing, striping, and traffic islands
for the intersection and intersection approaches. Also shown are the 24-hour approach traffic
volumes. The posted speed limit in this area of Rancho California Road is 40 mph.
It should be noted that the stop bar on Marie Callender's roadway is 36-feet north of the
gutter line of Rancho California Road. If a vehicle stops at the stop bar, his sight distance is
obstructed by a 9-~/= foot wall.
-1- pwO1\traffic\agda\0122 (Item No, 2) 011592
FINDINGS ACCIDENT:
An intersection collision diagram (Figure 2) was compiled from accident reports, furnished by
the City. A total of 29 accidents were plotted for a period of ten (10) months (1/1/91 to
10/30/91 ). The accidents were located on the collision diagram by vehicle lane usage.
It was determined that 20 of the collisions occurred with westbound vehicles, using the
unmarked curb lane proceeding to the marked curb lane on the west side of the intersection.
These westbound vehicles collided with eastbound to northbound left turning vehicles.
It was noted that only three accidents happened during the hours of darkness, with all 29
accident occurring between the hours of 11 am and 6 pro.
VOLUMES:
24~Hour Entering Volumes
Rancho California west of Marie Callender's =
Rancho California east of Marie Callender's =
Marie Callender's north of Rancho California Road =
15,467
14,759
2,725
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS:
Attached to this report are the turning movements counts made during the peak hours, Using
the turning movements counts, and the 24-hour entering volumes, projections were made for
the total 24-hour turning movement.
A review of the turning movement count found that during the six hours being observed, that
seven vehicles made "U" turns from eastbound Rancho California Road.
APPROACH STEPS:
Sample approach speeds taken during the day on Rancho California Road found that the 85th
percentlie speeds were as follows:
Rancho California Road east of Marie Callender's =
Rancho California Road west of Marie Callender's --
42 mph
41 mph
Copies of the survey are enclosed.
-2- pwO1\traffic\agda\0122 (Item No. 2) 011592
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS:
Warrant sheets were compiled for the intersection. Listed below are the results.:
SATISFIED
YES NO
1. Minimum Vehicle X
2. Interruption of continuous Traffic X
3. Pedestrian X
4. School Crossing X
5. Progressive Movement X
6. Accident X
7. Systems X
8. Combination X
9. Four Hour X
10. Peak Hour Delay X
11, Peak Hour Volume X
It should be noted that 93.9% of the vehicles entering Rancho California Road from Marie
Callender's make right turns.
Attachments:
Diagram - Recommended signing and striping
Figure 1 - Existing conditions
Figure 2 - Intersection collision diagram
Turning movements counts
Survey - sample approach speeds
-3- pwO1\traffic\agda\O122 (item No. 2) 011592
Z
0
R7/R7A
YNEZ ROAD
Co,),~a Ol'lOt'
20' 14'
v, I
JFD
CITY OF TEMECULA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM
C,
E
COUHTS GEL[RITHD
Site Code: 9112668 PAGE: 1
E-S STREET: HRTRAECR/HARIH CALLHNDKRS FILE: JTEHCRCA
E-W STREET: RANCRO CALIFORNIA ROAD
MEATHER : Hoveserifs by: Priuary DATE: 11/21/91
PEaK PERIOD AHALYStS FOR THH PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AR
DIRHCTIOE START PEAR HR ........... VOLUHRS .................PERCENTS .......
FROH PHAK HOUR FACTOR PROS Right Thru Left Total PROS Right Thru Left
North 7:30 AE 0.88 0 148 0 4 15l 97 0 3
East 7:15 AN 0.95 5 30 1090 0 1120 3 R7 O
South 7:15 AS 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hast 8:00 AM 0.90 6 0 619 142 751 0 81 19
Hntire Intersection
North 8:00 AN 0.84 2 134 0 10 144 93 0 7
East 0.92 7 26 981 0 1007 3 9f 0
South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West 0.90 6 0 919 142 . 76! 0 81 19
ENTRANCE/MARIE CALLENDERS
134 0
, ,
--- 144 ....
.. RANCRO CALIFORNIA ROAD
142 --
619 761
[PEDS ] 6
W-+-E
·. 168 . ..
......... ' 7 [PEDS ]
10
-- 26
1007 981
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
0
0 [PEDS ]
COUNTS UNLINITED
Site Code: 9112666 PAOB: 1
N-S STREET: ENTEANCE/NARIE CALLNNBENS EILE: JTENCNCA
E-N STREET: NANCNO CALIFORNIA ROAD
WEATHER : Noveaents by: Prisary BATE: ll/21/91
.so .... Froa North ........ Froa East ........ Froa South ........ Fros Nest .... Vehicle PENS
Begin PEDS ET TNRU LT PROS IT TERO LT PEDS RT TNRD LT BEDS IT THED LT Total Total
?:00 AN 0 26 0 0 0 7 226 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 122 14 395 0
?:15 B 14 0 0 I 0 272 0 0 0 B B 0 0 116
?:30 0 32 0 10 8 287 00 00 0O 0120 15 483 0
?:45 0 39 0 01 l0 279 00 0B 01 0155 11 494 2
HR TOTAL 0 I11 0 I 2 33 1004 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 612 46 1767 3
8:00 AN 0 37 0 0 3 4 ZSS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 30 490 3
8:i5 0 40 0 3 0 S 239 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 143 34 464 1
8:30 2 23 0 3 3 9 225 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 145 31 436 9
8:45 0 34 O 4 I 8 265 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 169 42 922 2
Hi TOTAL 2 134 0 tO ? 26 981 0 0 0 0 B 6 0 619 142 1912 15
DAY TOTAL S 245 0 II 9 59 2040 0 0 0 0 0 ? 0 1131 188 3679
PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR TNE PERIOD: T:O0 AN - 9:00 AN
DIRECTION START PEAl NR ...........VOLUNES ................. PRRCNNTS .......
FRON PEAR HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left Total PRDS Right Thru Left
North 7:30 AN 0,88 0 148 0 4 152 97 0 3
East ?:15 AN 0.90 5 30 1090 0 1120 3 97 O
South 7:15 AN O.OO 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 6
Nest 8:00 AN 0.90 6 0 619 142 761 0 81 19
Entire Intersection
North 8:00 AN 0.84 2 134 0 10 144 93 0 7
East 0.92 ? 06 981 0 I007 3 97 0
South O.O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nest 0.90 6 0 619 142 761 0 81 19
COUNTS UNLIEITED
Site Code: 9111668 PAGS: 1
N-S STREET: EARIE CALLNNDgR'S DRIVE FILE: JTEECRCN
E-N STREET: RANCEO CALIFORNIA ROAD
MEATHER : SUNNY RoveDents by: Pria&ry DATE: 11/22/91
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR TEE PHRtOD: 11:00 AE - 1:00 PE
DIRECTION START PEAl HR ........... VOLUMES .................PERCENTS .......
~ROE PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left Tots] PEDS Right Thru Left
North 11:15 AN 0.96 O 1Y0 0 ? 177 96 0 4
Esst 11:30 AM 0.84 S 33 1056 S 1091 3 97 0
South 11:30 AE 0.00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nest 11:45 AM 0.91 1 0 989 141 1130 0 88 12
Entire Intersection
North 11:30 AS 0.88 0 154 0 8 161 95 0 5
Bast 0.94 5 33 1056 I 1091 3 97 0
South 0.00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nest 0.89 I 0 966 139 . 1105 O 8? 13
[ PEDS ] 0
............... Z~ _:
MARIE CALLENDER'S DRIVE
154
......... 1210
.. RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
966 1105
N
W-+-E
S
0 --
PEDS ] 1 '
5 [PEDS ]
-- 33
1091 1056
-- 2
162 ....
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ...
0 0
974 ..........
i [PEDS ]
COUNTS UNLIHITED
Site Code: 9118608 PAGE: 1
N-S STRHBT: HARIE CALLHHDHR~S DRIVH FILE: JTKIICRCH
H-H STRBHr: RAHCHO CAL[FORHIA ROAD
NEATHER : SUNNY Hovecents by: Prinary DATH: 11/22/91
~ne .... Pros North ........ Fron Hast ........ Fron South ........ Pros Vest .... Vehicle PgDB
Begin PEDS RT THRU LT PBDS RT THRU LT PHDS RT THRU LT PROS iT THRU LT Total Total
I1:00 AN 0 31 0 2 t 7 244 0 0 00 0 0 0194 37 515 I
11:15 0 44 0 0 8 9 234 0 0 00 0 0 0209 39 535 2
11:30 0 39 0 4 O 4 270 0 0 00 0 0 0199 32 548 O
11:45 0 43 0 I 4 8 888 1 0 00 0 I 0851 31 617 5
Hi TOTAL 0 157 0 f 7 28 1030 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 853 139 2215 8
12:00 PH 0 44 0 2 1 14 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 847 35 597
12:15 0 28 0 1 0 7 249 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 869 41 596
12:30 0 46 0 4 2 7 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 34 506
19:45 0 47 0 2 0 8 227 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 42 562
BR TOTAL 0 165 0 9 3 36 924 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 973 159 2261
DAY TOTAL 0 328 0 16 10 64 1954 3 1 0 0 0 I 0 1826 291 4476 12
Pill PHRIOD lilLYSIS FOR THH PHRIOD: 11:00 AN - l:O0 PH
DIRHCTION START PHAK HR ........... VOLUNHS .................PHRCHNTS .......
FRON PEAS HOUR FACTOR PHDS Right Thru Left Total PKDS Right Thru Left
North 11:15 AN 0.96 0 170 0 T 17T 96 0 4
East 11:30 AH 0.94 5 33 1056 8 1091 3 97 O
South 11:30 AN 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vest 11:45 AN 0.9t 1 0 989 141 1130 9 89 12
Entire Intersect[on
North II:30 AS 0,88 0 154 0 8 158 95 0 5
Hast 0.94 5 33 1056 2 1091 3 97 0
South 0.00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hest 0.89 1 0 966 139 1105 0 87 13
Site Code: 9|12668
E-E STREET: RARCRO CALIFORNIA ROAD
~EATHER : SURNY
COUNTS
Eovesent8 by: Priaary
PAGE:
PILE: JTEECROP
DATE: I1/31/91
PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR TEE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00
DIRECTION START PEAl Hi ........... VOLUERR .................PRRC~NTS .......
FROR PEAR HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left Total PRDS Right Thru Left
North 5:00 PR 0.88 I 209 0 1H 3H 95 0
East 4:30 PE 0.95 I 46 1017 2 1065 4 95
South 4:30 PR 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rest 4:30 PN 0.98 0 0 1336 162 1498 0 89 11
Entire Intersection
North 4:30 PB 0.RY 1 IHT 0 1l 209 04 0 H
East 0.99 1 46 1017 i 1095 4 95 0
South 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rest 0,98 0 0 1336 163 -1498 0 89 11
ENTRANCE/MARIE CALLENDERS
197 0 12
--- 209 ....
.. RANGHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
162 --
1336 1498
0 --
PEDS ] 0 '
O
-- 46
1065 1017
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
0 0
1348 .........
1 [PEDS ]
Site Code: 9112668
N-S 8TWWWT: ENTWAWCE/WARIE CALLEWDEES
E-U STREET: SANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
WBATBER : SONNY
COUNT8 UWLfNIT~D
Movements by: Primary
PACE: l
FILE: JTEWCRCP
DATE: ll/ll/Ul
,xme .... From North ........ From East ........ From South ........ From West .... Vehicle PRD8
Begin PEDS RT TWWU LT PWD8 IT THRU LT PED8 RT TESU LT PEDS RT TWRO LT Total Total
4:00 PN I 43 0 I 0 6 23? 00 00 00 0996 26 611 i
4:15 0 50 0 4 0 7 221 20 00 00 0288 32 604 0
4:30 0 46 0 3 0 10 235 2I 00 00 0329 55 680 1
4:45 0 49 0 5 I 13 266 00 00 00 0334 34 701 I
8R TOTAL 1 188 0 13 1 38 950 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1247 149 9596 3
5:00 PN I 53 0 0 0 lO 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 41 690 l
5:15 0 49 0 4 0 13 960 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 32 701 0
5:30 0 48 0 4 0 12 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 320 33 641 0
5:45 0 56 0 4 0 10 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 310 33 616 0
fir TOTAL 1 209 0 12 0 51 934 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1303 139 2648 I
DAY TOTAL 2 397 0 25 I 87 1893 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1550 288 5244 4
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PW - 6:00 PN
DIRECTION START PEAK ER ........... VOLUMES .................PERCENTS .......
FROM PEAK HOUR FAC~R PEDS Right Thru Left Total PEDS Right Thru Left
Worth 5:00 PW 0.88 1 209 0 19 221 05 0 5
Eest 4:30 PW 0.95 I 46 1017 2 1065 4 95 0
South 4:30 PW 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West 4:30 PW 0.98 0 0 1336 102 1496 0 89 11
Entire Intersection
Worth 4:30 PM 0.07 I 197 0 12 209 94 0 6
East 0.95 1 40 1017 2 1065 4 95 0
South 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West 0.98 0 0 1336 182 1498 0 80 II
Bather Belrose Boje, Inc. SPEEDPLOT Program
STREET ................ 0 Blk. RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
LIMITS ................ EAST OF to MARIE CALLENDERS E
DIRECTION(S) .......... WESTBOUND
DATE .................. 11-21-91
TIME ..................
POSTED SPEED LIMIT .... 40
CUM.
SPEED NO. PCT. PCT.
22 1 2.7 2.7
23 0 0.0 2.7
24 0 0.0 2.7
25 ! 2.7 5.4 -
26 0 0.0 5.4 90
27 1 2.7 8.1 C -
28 2 5.4 13.5 U 80
29 2 5.4 18.9 M -
30 1 2.7 21.6 70
31 1 2.7 24.3 P -
32 1 2.7 27.0 E 60
33 2 5.4 32.4 R -
34 4 10.8 43.2 C 50
35 3 8.1 51.4 E -
36 4 10.8 62.2 N 40
37 2 5.4 67.6 T -
38 1 2.7 70.3 S 30
39 3 8.1 78.4 -
40 1 2.7 81.1 20
41 0 0.0 81.1 -
42 3 8.1 89.2 10 *
43 1 2.7 91.9 -*****
44 0 0.0 91.9 0
45 1 2.7 94.6
46 0 0.0 94.6
47 1 2.7 97.3
48 0 0.0 97.3
49 1 2°7 100.0
50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 35
85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4
10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 33 through 42
PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 62.2
PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............. 10.8
PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ............ 27.0
RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 22 to 49
VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... 37
AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 35.4
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
100 ***********************'100
*** 90
*** 80
** 70
* 60
* 50
40
* 30
10
0
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
22 32 42 52 62 72
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
20 20
P 15
E
R
C
E
N 10
T
S
5
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
22 32 42 52 62 72
SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR
Bather Belrose Boje, Inc. SPEEDPLOT Program
STREET ................ 0 Blk. RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
LIMITS ................ WEST OF to MARIE CALLENDERS E
~IRECTION(S) .......... EASTBOUND
ATE .................. 11-21-91
TIME ..................
POSTED SPEED LIMIT .... 40
CUM.
SPEED NO. PCT. PCT.
21 1 2.1 2.1
22 0 0.0 2.1
23 1 2.1 4.3 100
24 1 2.1 6.4 -
25 0 0.0 6.4 90
26 0 0.0 6.4 C -
27 1 2.1 8.5 U 80
28 2 4.3 12.8 M -
29 1 2.1 14.9 70
30 4 8.5 23.4 P -
31 2 4.3 27.7 E 60
32 3 6.4 34.0 R -
33 2 4.3 38.3 C 50
34 1 2.1 40.4 E -
35 4 8.5 48.9 N 40
36 2 4.3 53.2 T -
37 5 10.6 63.8 S 30
38 3 6.4 70.2 -
39 2 4.3 74.5 20
40 2 4.3 78.7 -
41 3 6.4 85.1 10
42 1 2.1 87.2
43 0 0.0 87.2
44 2 4.3 91.5
45 2 4.3 95.7
46 1 2.1 97.9
47 1 2.1 100.0 20
P 15
E -
R -
C -
E -
N 10
T -
S -
50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 36
85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 41
10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39
PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 59.6
PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............. 25.5
PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ............ 14.9
RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 21 to 47
VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... 47
AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 35.4
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
*************************'100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
!0
0
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
21 31 41 51 61 71
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
20
15
21 31 41 51 61 71
SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR
9-6 Traffic Manual
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure 9-1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
CALC DATE
DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE
Major St:
Minor St:
Critical speed of major street traffic > 40 mph ..... r"}
......... or RURAL(R)
In buiit up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pop, - ........ ~ URBAN (U)
mph
mph
WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular volume
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS)
U ~ R U ~ R
100% SATISFIED YES [] NO 5tl
80% SATISFIED YES [] NO 5~
APPROACH 1
LANES
Both Apprchs. 500
Major Street (400)
Highest Approh. 15O
Minor Street * (120)
350 ~ 420
(280) 480 (336)
105 140
(84) (I t 2)
* NOTE: Heavier left turn movement from Major Street included when LT-phasing is proposed[]
WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS)
U I R
APPROACH 1
LANES
Both Apprchs. 75O I 525
Major Street (600) (420)
Highest Apprc~h. 75 53
kinor Street * (60) (42)
100% SATISFIED
80% SATISFIED
Hour
YES ~ NO []
YES []"NO I"}
U I R
2ormore 11-12 /z-I /-z 2-3 3-4 .t-~' f-~ ~-? Hour
(72o) (~4) *
70
(~)
* NOTE: Heavier left turn movement from Major Street included when LT-phaslng is proposed[]
WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume
100% SATISFIED
REQUIREMENT FULFILLED
Pedestrian volume crossing the major street Is 100 or more
for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one Yes [] No []
hour; and
There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf-
fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; and YeS [] No r"'}
The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater
than 300 feet; and Yes [] No []
The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive
traffic flow on the major slreet Yes [] No []
YES [] NO []
The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily |ustlflcatlon for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence
of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
Traffic Manual 9-7
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure 9-2
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
WARRANTS 4 - School Crossings
Not Applicable ..................................
See School Crossings Warrant Sheet
WARRANT 5- Progressive Movement SATISFIED
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
>1000FT. N__.ft, S__.ft, E_~.Q.Lft, W 4~0 ft.
ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT
SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST
ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS IX) NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND
SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM
YES rl NO J
FULFILLED
YES I1 NO ~:;
WARRANT 6 - Accident Experience
SATISFIED
YES D NO B
REQUIREMENTS
ONE WARRANT
SATIFIED
80%
WARRANT
WARRANT 1 o MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME
OR
WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC
SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUff PROGRESSIVE TRAFRC FLOW_
ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY
ACC. W1TNIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR $500 DAMAGE
FULFILLED
YES B( NO rl
[]
[]
WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant
SATISFIED
YES I~ NO 1-1
MINIMUM VOLUME
REQUIREMENTS
)800 VEH/HR
CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES
ENTERING VOLUMES ~ ALL APPROACHES ~
DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR 2-(~ 8 [ VEH/HR
OR
DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS OF A SAT AND~:)R SUN. VEH/1-1R
MAJOR ST. MINOR ST.
FULFILLED
YES ~. NO []
HWY SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC
RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF:, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY
APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICAL PLAN
ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTIC MET, BOTH STS.
YES j{ NO []
The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily JUstification for a slgnal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence
of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
9-8 Traffic Manual
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure 9-3
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
WARRANT 8 - Combination of Warrants
SATISFIED YES [] NO []
REQUIREMENT
'I'VVO WARRANTS
SATISFIED
80%
WARRANT
1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME
2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC
FULFILLED
YEs []
WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume
SATISFIED* 'YES I~1 "O[]
Approach Lanes
Both Approaches Major Street
Highest Approaches - Minor Street
One Hour
more I~ - l a -4 4 -5 ~'-(,
X
X
* Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied.
WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
SATISFIED YES [] NO I~,
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a
STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five
vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
YES
[] NoE
2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for
one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
YES [] NO ~
The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
YES 1~ NO []
WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume
,
SATISFIED YES I~ NO []
Approach Lanes
Both Approaches Major Street
Highest Approaches - Minor Street
2 or
One more
Hour
R f r R (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied.
e e to gure 9-8
The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. De!ay, congestion, confusion or other evidence
of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
I
I
~4'i 20'
ITEM NO. 3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Traffic and Transportation Commission
John R. Meyer, Senior Planner_.~?;L1
January 22, 1992
General Plan Technical Subcommittee Appointment
As part of the General Plan Work Program five Technical Subcommittees will be formed from
each of the following major categories: Land Use, Traffic/Circulation, Growth Management,
Economic Development, and Community Design. Planning Department Staff is requesting the
Traffic and Transportation Commission appoint a representative to sit on one of the
subcommittees. Although subject to Council approval, staff is recommending the
representative from this Commission to sit on the Traffic/Circulation subcommittee.
The subcommittees will meet in early March to review the data, provide direction and
expertise in the committees' area of focus. The Planning Center will then take the
information received from the technical subcommittee meetings and prepare draft general plan
elements. The technical subcommittees will then meet to review and comment on the draft
elements in early May.
ITEM NO. 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Traffic & Transportation Commission
Scott Harvey, Traffic/Engineering Technician
January 22, 1992
American Automobile Association
Cathy Zaitz, District Manager of the American Automobile Association, will present traffic
safety brochures to the Traffic & Transportation Commission.
-1 - pwO1\traffic\agda\0122 (Item No. 4) 011592
ITEM NO. 5
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Traffic & Transportation Commission
FROM:
Scott Harvey, Traffic/Engineering Technician
DATE:
January 22, 1992
SUBJECT:
"Speed Check By Radar" Signs
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to the City
Council, installation of thirteen (13) "Speed Checked By Radar" (R48R) Signs at various
locations throughout the City.
BACKGROUND:
This is a response to a request from the Traffic and Transportation Commission to place
"Speed Checked By Radar" Signs at locations where motorists would see the signs when
entering into the City of Temecula,
DISCUSSION:
Staff conducted a field survey and found thirteen (13) locations where a motorist would be
entering into the City from a major street or a State Freeway and/or Highway System, and
could be notified of the existence of speed radar enforcement within the City Limits.
Exhibit "A" shows the roadways which are at the present time posted with Speed Limits and
have had a radar study within the last five years. Exhibit "A" also shows the proposed
locations of the "Speed Checked By Radar" signs.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Thirteen (13) signs at $80.00 ea. = $1,040.00
Attachment:
Exhibit "A"
-1- pwO1\traffic\agda\0122 (Item No. 5) 011092
:: RANC TEMECULA MU~ETA: BOARD OF.
· '~ i r/:i',,~;~: .~,
~:, ." Ho :::~:.V':: i'~i:
"CITY
Inco~oratea 'November 7, '1989:~!d,::' ~
MURRIErA
~, TEMECULA
E-XH gLT' 'A"
ITEM NO. 6
I--
0
Z
~'b o o o o o o o o o o o ~ o o o
~,,
0
T
~d
0
0
0
>
0
0
~d
"r
I,.-,
Z
0
~000000000000 O0
-r
i-
z
o
N
~6
E- z ~
..r
I.-
z
uu _c cc
c ~ .E .E'_
c ._-E~ ~ .~