The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About081992 TTC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA August 19, 1992 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Godnick, Guerriero, Johnson, Roberts, Sander PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (5} minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Minutes of July 22, 1992 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 22, 1992 as mailed. Coml~rehensive Transl~ortation Plan and the Congestion Manaclement Plan 2.1 Presentation by Mr. David Gunderman, Deputy Director of Western Riverside Council of Governments, on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the Congestion Management Plan. -1- pw01\traffic\agda\0819 0810 Winchester Road and Overpass DISCUSSION: 3.1 Discuss alternatives to help traffic flow on Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road. SDeed Limit on Pauba Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to City Council that the posted speed limit on Pauba Road, from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway, be reduced from 50 m.p.h. to 45 m.p.h.. Twenty "Stoo" Slain Locations RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to City Council the installation of twenty "Stop" signs (performed by City staff) throughout the City. InvestiQation/Maintenance Report RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Receive and File. Traffic Engineer's Report Update on Winchester Hills, Campos Verde and Regional Center Specific Plans Commission Reports Adjournment Next regular meeting: Wednesday, September 23, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. Temecula City Hall (Main Conference Room} 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 -2- p wO 1 \traffic~agda\O819 0810 ITEM NO. I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JULY 22, 1992 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission was called to order on Wednesday, July 22, 1992, 7:05 P.M. at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, Chairman Ron Roberts presiding. Commissioner Roberrs led the flag salute. PRESENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Godnick Also present were Director of Public Works Tim Serlet, Traffic Technician Scott Harvey, Traffic Consultant Ben Dobbins, Maintenance Supervisor Brad Buron and Minute Clerk Gail Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None COMMISSION BUSINESS MINUTES OF JUNE 24, 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve the minutes of June 24, 1992. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick CALLE PI~iA COLADA 2.1 Recommend that the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend for approval to City Council that the speed limit on Calle PiCa Colada be reduced to 25 mph. TI'MIN7122192 -1- 8/7/92 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 1992 Scott Harvey presented the staff report. At 7:30 P.M. Chairman Roberts opened the meeting for public comment on this item. The following homeowners spoke in opposition to the recommendation, asking that the Commission approve the closure of Calle Pi~a Colada based on the volumes and speeds of the traffic on their street: Martin Hovenkotter, 30557 Calle Pi~a Colada, Tem. Kim Muscato, 41365 Bravos Court, Temecula Betty Pittet, 30642 Calle Pi~a Colada, Temecula Brett Sanders, 30737 Calle Pi~a Colada, Temecula Sam Cuckovich, 30767 Calle Pi~a Colada, Temecula Peter Huhn, 30879 Calle PiCa Colada, Temecula Lori Harrison, 30969 Calle PiCa Colada, Temecula Jamie Christian, 30762 Calle Pi~a Colada, Temecula Frank Oxandaboura, 30909 Calle Pir~a Colada, Temecula Frank Correa, Salt River Court, Temecula Ann Ralph, 30969 Calle PiCa Colada, Temecula Commissioner Johnson asked that staff re-study and make the assumption that there would be no increased traffic to Avenida Barca if the street were closed and to look at the traffic impacts by the development occurring at the intersection of Ynez and Winchester. Commissioner Johnson added that he was not sure that a 5 mph reduction in speed limit would accomplish anything. Chairman Roberts asked that staff find out when Kahwea is scheduled to open and if possible get it opened. It was moved by Commissioner Sander, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to send the recommendation back to staff for further review, and to place two (2) Stop Signs as a temporary measure. Tim Serlet stated that he would rather have staff take the recommendation back for further study and bring the item back with a solid recommendation. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Godnick TTMIN7/22/92 -2- 8/7/92 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JULY 22. 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Sander, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to send the recommendation back to staff for further review and bring back to the Commission in two months with a recommendation. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Roberts declared a recess at 8:20 P.M. Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick The meeting reconvened at 8:30 P.M. JEFFERSON AVENUE N/O WINCHESTER ROAD - STREET PARKING 3.1 Recommendation that "No Parking" signs be installed on both sides of Jefferson Avenue from Winchester Road to Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, except for a 160' long 2-hour parking restriction on the west side of Jefferson Avenue and install "No Parking" signs on the east side of Jefferson Avenue from the Bridge to Sanborn Avenue. Also, that Staff will look at the remaining areas north of this area for prohibiting parking when development permits. Proceed with this recommendation to the City Council for approval by a resolution. Scott Harvey presented the staff report. At 8:55 P.M. Chairman Roberts opened the meeting for public comment on this item. The following individual spoke in opposition to the recommendation: Greg Treadwell, owner of Granny's Bakery, 27300 "B" Jefferson, Temecula. Mr. Treadwell stated that he felt that "2 Hour Parking" was more appropriate and opposed the recommendation for "No Parking". It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to recommend to restrict parking to the second driveway north of Winchester Road on the east side of Jefferson and 420' north of Winchester Road on the west side of Jefferson and paint red curb on both sides of Jefferson Avenue at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge. TTMIN?/22/92 -3- 8/7/92 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 1992 The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN - PARKING 4.1 Recommendation that red curb be painted on the north and south side of Moreno Road east of Front Street and proceed with the recommendation to City Council for approval by resolution. Scott Harvey presented the staff report. At 9:20 P.M. Chairman Roberrs opened the meeting for public comment on this item. The following individuals spoke in favor of the recommendation: Kenneth McKee, Manager Motel "6", 41900 Moreno Road, Temecula. Lecius Richardson, Owner Kentucky Fried Chicken, 30044 La Primavera, Temecula. It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve staff recommendation that red curb be painted on the north and south side of Moreno Road east of Front Street. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick Chairman Roberts declared a recess at 9:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:40 P.M. TTMIN7/22/92 WINCHESTER ROAD AND OVERPASS 5.1 Discuss alternatives to help traffic flow on Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road. -4- 817192 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to continue discussion of this item until the meeting of August 26, 1992. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick m TYPICAL STRIPING FOR KNUCKLE TYPE OF STREET 6.1 Recommend that the Traffic and Transportation Commission approve a typical double stripe for knuckle type of streets in the City of Temecula. Scott Harvey presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Sander, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve a typical double stripe for knuckle type of streets in the City of Temecula as recommended by staff. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick CENTERLINE STRIPING POLICY 7.1 Recommend that the Traffic and Transportation Commission approve the centerline striping policy. Scott Harvey presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to approve the centerline striping policy as recommended by staff. ~TMIN7t22/92 -5- 8/7/92 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 1992 The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Roberts None Godnick INVESTIGATION/MAINTENANCE REPORT 8.1 Review of monthly Investigation/Maintenance Logs. Commissioner Sander questioned the "Action Taken" on Item No. 8 of January 1992. Scott Harvey advised that he would arrange for a Cal Trans representative to be present at the next meeting to answer the Commissioner's questions. Commissioner Johnson asked if the City was going to do anything about the condition of the some of the older streets in Temecula. Brad Buron, Maintenance Supervisor, advised that the City is one month away from implementing a Pavement Management System. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Ben Dobbins advised that the Traffic Census Program had begun and the results will be available at the August meeting. Tim Serlet presented the Commission with a handout ad memorandum regarding the Temecula-Murrieta Traffic Sub-Committee, with a brief discussion. He also advised the Commission that the traffic signal for Winchester/Margarita is at Cal Trans. Scott Harvey advised of the following: * Traffic signal for Margarita/La Serena is in for first plan check. * Signals should be operating at the Rancho California Road over-crossing by the end of August. * "Bike Lane" signs are being placed throughout the City. TTMIN7/22/92 -6- 8/7/92 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 1992 COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Guerriero questioned the status of Stop Signs or signals at Highway 79 South and the I-15. Tim Serlet advised that the Assessment District is designing signals for those ramps. Commissioner Johnson advised that his review of the three proposed developments southeast of Ynez show some discrepancies which he is reviewing with staff. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to cancel the regular meeting of the Traffic and Transportation Commission of August 26, 1992 and re- schedule for August 19, 1992 due to a conflict in vacation schedules. The motion was carried unanimously with Commissioner Godnick absent. The next meeting of the City of Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission will be held Thursday, August 19, 1992, 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Chairman Ron Roberts Secretary TTMINT/22/92 ~7- 8/7/92 ITEM NO. 2 PRESENTATION B Y MR. DAVID G UND ERMA N DEPUTY D/RECTOR WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL 0 F G 0 VERNMEN TS ITEM NO. 3 DISCUSSION ONLY ITEM NO. 4 AGENDA REPORT TO: Traffic & Transportation Commission FROM: Scott Harvey, Traffic/Engineering Technician DATE: August 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Speed Limit on Pauba Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to City Council that the posted speed limit on Pauba Road, from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway, be reduced from 50 m.p.h. to 45 m.p.h. BACKGROUND: The Traffic and Transportation Commission requested that staff conduct a speed zone study on Pauba Road. Staff field investigated Pauba Road, from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway, and found many horizontal and vertical curves which limit the sight distances. The roadway width, from several hundred feet east of La Primavera Street to Margarita Road, is less than the minimum roadway width of 24 feet. The above field conditions create an unusual condition that warrants a speed limit less than the critical speed. As shown on the attached speed radar survey printouts, the critical speed (85 percentlie) varied from 47 to 55 m.p.h. throughout the survey limits. Therefore, staff recommends, due to the unusual field conditions, that the posted speed limit of 50 m.p.h. be reduced to 45 m.p.h. Attachment: Speed Radar Survey -1 - pwO2\traffic\agda\0806 080692 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY FOR SPEED ZONING Jurisdiction CI~ OF t~Cln~ FAUBA ROAD Existing Posted Speed Limit 50 Critical Speed (85th percentlie) 52 Median Speed 45.4 Number of Accidents ~'vo (2) X X Unusual conditions: L OCA TION between '~lfEz and wj~Ix)ws FAKKWAY Date of Survey 7/28/92 10 mph Pace Range 40.7 to 49.7 ACCIDENT RECORD REVIEW Does not warrant a speed limit less than the critical speed. Warrants a speed limit less than the critical speed. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS Warrants a speed limit less than the critical speed because of unusual conditions not readily apparent to the motorist. Vertical and horizontal curves. Roadway ~rldth variations, to a minimum vidth of less than tventy-four feet. Intersecting streets ~rlth Jim4 ted visibility. School zone. RADAR ENFORCEMENT SPEED LIMIT This Traffic and Engineering Survey indicates that the appropriate speed limit for YNEZ ROAD and HEA~OWS PA]~'WAY between mph. ROkD iS 45 CERTIFICATION I, JANES B. DOBBINS , declare: That I am employed by the City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, as Traffic Engineer. That the attached Traffic and Engineering Survey was prepared for the City of Temecula and is a true copy of the Traffic and Engineering Survey presented to the City Clerk for their files. declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Temecula, California onthis S~v~dT'F/ day of ~o~-~' ,19 ~?.-. N0. 18 Dec~a~'nt pwOl~forms\traffic\survey.spd 062292 DIRECTION(S) .......... E AND W BOUND DAlE ................... ILJL. Y 28,1992 T'IMEE .................. 0825 T[) (L~915 F'OS'[ED SPEED LIMIT....50 CLJM. SF'EED NO. F'CT. F'C]'. '2 '7 1 1.0 I. 0 28 [/~ 0, 8 1.0 29 0 0.0 1.0 30 Z~: 3.0 4.0 - 31 0 0. ~ 4.0 9~ 32 0 0.0 4.~ C -.- 33 5 5.0 9.0 U 80 34 2 2.0 11.0 M - , ~.0 13 0 70 36 2 2.0 15.0 P - 37 3 3.0 1~.0 E 60 38 4 4.0 22.0 R - 39 3 3.0 25.0 C 50 40 5 5.0 30.0 E - 41 4 4.0 34.0 N 40 42 8 8.0 42.0 T - 43 8 8.0 50.0 S 30 44 7 7.0 57.0 - 45 7 7.0 64.0 20 46 5 5.0 69.0 - 47 7 7.0 76.0 10 48 4 4.0 80.0 - 50TH PERCENTIL. E SF'EED ................. 43 85TH PER[:ENTILE SPEED ................. 50 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 61.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............. 9.0 PERCENT UNDER F'ACE SPEED ............ 30.0 RANGE GF SREEEDS ................. 27 to 60 VEHICL.ES OBSERVED ................... 100 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 43..4 ~, 90 , 80 , '70 60 , 50 , 40 , 30 ** 20 ** 10 49 4 4.0 84.0 50 7 7.0 91.0 51 0 0.0 91.0 52 3 3.0 94.0 53 1 1.0 95.0 54 0 0.0 95.0 55 0 0.0 95.0 56 2 2.0 97.0 - 57 0 0.0 97.0 58 0 0.0 97.0 P 15 59 1 1.0 98.0 E - 60 2 2.0 100.0 R - C - E - N 10 T - S - 27 37 4'7 57 67 77 + ..... + .... + .... + .... + ..... + ....... + ..... + .... + .... + .... 20 , , , ** 20 27 37 47 57 67 77 SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR 0 Bather Belrose Bo~e, Inc, SF'EEDPLOI F'ro~ram S TREE]'. ............... 0 B1 k. PAUBA ROAD LIMI]'S ................ WEST ~ ~ LA F'RIMAVERA DIRECT'ION(S) .......... E AND W BOUND DATE ................... ]IJL.Y 28 , 1992 TIME .................. 0915 1'0 1015 POSlED SF'EED LIMIT'. , , , 50 CLIM. SPEED NO. PCI . F'[]"I". 24 0 0.0 0.9 9~ "~= 0.9 ~,, ~,~ 1 1.9 C 26 B 0.~ 1.9 U 8~ 27 ~ ~.8 1.9 M 28 ~ ~, ~ I, 9 29 ~ 0,0 1,9 P 30 0 O,B 1,9 E 60 31 1 0,9 2,8 R - 32 5 4,7 7,5 C 50 33 1 0,9 8,5 E - 34 2 1,9 10,4 N · _,~ ~. 1,9 12,3 T - 36 1 0,9 13,2 S 30 37 0 0,0 13,2 - 38 2 1,9 15, 1 20 39 2 1,9 17,0 - 40 4 3,8 20.8 41 2 1,9 22,6 42 5 4,7 27,4 43 6 5, 7 33,0 44 5 4,7 37,7 45 ~ 42,5 o 4,7 46 i ~, 9 43,4 20 47 4 3,8 47,2 - 48 8 7,5 54,7 - 49 11 10,4 65,1 - 50 7 6,6 71,7 - 51 8 7,5 79,2 F' 15 =~ 3 ,=, 8 1 E - ,.~ o 82, 5~ o 84,9 R 54 5 4, 7 89,6 C - ~,~ 1 ~,9 90,6 E 56 3 2,8 93,4 N 57 4 3,8 97,2 T 58 0 0,0 97,2 S 59 0 0, 0 97,2 60 1 0, 9 98, 1 61 1 0,9 99, 1 62 0 0, 0 99, 1 63 0 0, 0 99, 1 64 1 0,9 100,~ 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 48 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 54 10 MPH PACE SI:'EED .......... 42 through 51 F'ERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 56, 6 F'ERCENT OVER PACE SF'EED ............. 20,8 F'ERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ............ 22, 6 RANGI£ OF SF'EEDS ................. 20 to 6.4. VE_IHICI_.ES OBSERVED ................... 1[~6 AVL:£RAGE SPEED ....................... 46, :1 ** ** , **~.~**~.**-1~8 9B 80 70 60 5~ 40 * 20 **** 10 0*********** 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 15 10 * · , , -- , , **** ******** ** -- 20 30 40 50 60 70 SPEED IN MILES PER H(]UR Bat'.hE.r Belr'oso Bo3e, Inc. STF:EE'T'. ............... 0 Blk. PAUBA ROAD LIMITS ................ EAST [iF ~ SHOWALTER SPEEDPL_OT Pro0r am DIRE[]TION~S) .......... E AND W BOUND DATE .................. JLJLY 28,1992 TIME .................. 1020 T8 1 ]20 POSTED SPEED I._.IMI'r.. . . 50 []UM. SF'EED NO. F:'E~ F. PCT. 32 1 ~ . 0 2.0 9v! · 33 0 0.0 2.0 C - 34 i 1.0 2.9 U 80 ~ 3 2.9 5.9 M - 36 6 5.9 I 1.8 7~ 37 6 5.9 17.6 P - 38 3 2.9 2~. 6 E 6~ 39 i 1.~ 21.6 R - 4~ 8 7.8 29.4 C 5~ 41 3 2.9 32.4 E 42 6 5.9 38.2 N 4~ 43 1~ 9.8 48.~ T 44 7 6.9 54.9 S 3~ 45 4 3.9 58.8 46 5 4.9 63.7 2~ 47 18 9.8 73.5 48 4 3.9 77.5 1~ 49 4 3.9 81.4 5~ 1 I. ~ 82.4 51 2 2.0 84.3 o 3 2.9 87.3 ~ 3 o .~._. ~. 9 9~. 2 54 2 2. ~ 92.2 2~ _. 2 ~ 94.1 56 2 2. ~ 96.1 - 57 2 2. ~ 98. ~ 58 I I. ~ 99. ~ 59 1 1.8 1~.~ P 15 E R - C E T - S 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 44 85TH PERCENlILE SPEED ................. 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 59.8 PERCENI' OVEIR F'ACE SF'EED ............. ~8.6 PER[:ENT LJNDER PACE SPEED ............ 21.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS 2.8 to 59 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... 11~2 AVEF:AGE SPIEED ........................ 44.3 28 38 48 58 68 78 + ..... + .... + ......... ~ ..... + .... + .... + ..... + ..... + .... + .... + 28 38 48 58 68 78 SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR 20 Bat'her BE. lrose Boje, .Lnc:. SPEEDPLL]l S'[I~,EIE]'. ............... ~ Blk. PAUBA ROAD L. IMITS ................ NE:S"F OF ~ MARGARITA ROAD DIREC]TIOI'I(S) .......... E AND W BOUND DATE ................... ]OLY 28 , 1992 'rIME .................. i 125 TO ].225 POSTED SPEED LIMIT .... 5[~ [:I.JM. SF:'EED NO. PC'I'. F:'CI'. 501'H PERCEN'F It.E SF'EED ................. 46 85TH F'ERCENT IL, E SPEED ............... · · 1~ MF'H PACEE SF'EED .......... 4~ through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SF:'EED .............. 65.9 F'ERCENI" OVER PACE SF'EEED ............. 23.5 PERCENT UNDER F'ACE SPEED ............ 18.6 RANI3E OF SPEEDS ................. 33 to 65 VEHI[]LES OBSERVED ................... 85 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 4to. 2 40 3 3.5 14.1 M - 41 6 7.1 21.2 70 42 3 3.5 24.7 P - 4:3 7 8.2 32.9 E 60 44 5 5.9 38.8 R - 45 5 5.9 44.7 C 50 46 9 10.6 55.3 E - 47 '7 8.2 63.5 N 40 48 5 5.9 69.4 T - 49 6 7.1 76.5 S 30 50 3 3.5 80.0 51 2 2.4 82.4 20 52 2 2.4 84.7 53 3 3.5 88.2 10 54 3 3.5 91.8 55 2 2.4 94.1 0** 56 1 1.2 95.3 57 2 2.4 97.6 58 0 0.0 97.6 59 0 0.0 97.6 20 60 0 0.0 97.6 - 61 1 1.2 98.8 62 0 0.0 98.8 - 63 0 0.0 98.8 - 64 0 0.0 98.8 F' 15 65 1 1.2 100.0 E - R - C '- E - N 10 T - S - , 70 60 50 , 40 30 , 20 ** 10 *** -- 0 33 43 53 63 73 83 + ...... + ..... + ....... F .... + ..... + ..... + .... + .... + ..... + .... + 20 , , , , ** , , ** , -- , ******* 5 * ******* -- , *********** ** -- , *********** ** 33 43 53 63 73 83 SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR Bathc~r Bcll~c~s~:~, Boje, Iruz. SF'ELEDF'L OT '.-~IREET. ............... e Blk. F'AUBA ROAD LIMITS ................ EASI' OF ~ MARGARITA ROAD D]TRECI'ION <S) .......... E AND W BOtJND DAlE ................... JULY 28 , 1992 'I'IME .................. 123~1 TO 1330 POSlED SPEED LIMIT .... 50 31 2 2.3 2.3 32 0 8.0 2.3 33 0 0.0 2.3 ]~;'I 2 o 3 4.'7 35 :3 3.5 8. ] 36 2 2.3 le. 5 37 ~ ~.~ 1~,5 38 4 4.7 15.1 39 8 9.3 24.4 4~ 7 8, 1 32.6 41 le 11.6 44.2 42 9 1~,5 54.7 43 4 4.7 59.3 44 6 7. ~ 66.3 45 8 9.3 75.6 4~ 7 8.1 83.7 47 2 O ~ B6. ~ 48 2 2 · 3 88.4 49 ~ ~.~ 88.4 5~ e e. ~ 88.4 51 5 5.8 94.2 ~ 2 3 96.5 ~==~ o ° 3 98.8 54 8 ~. 8 98.8 55 ~ ~. ~ 98.8 56 8 ~. ~ 98.8 57 ~ ~. ~ 98.8 58 I i. 2 18~. 8 90 C - LJ 88 M - 70 F' - E 60 R -. C 50 E - N 40 T - S 30 20 50TH F'ERCENYILE SF'EED ................. 42 85TH PERCENTILE SF'EED ................. 47 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... Z.:8 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.6 PERCENT OVER F'ACE SPEED ............. 14.0 F'ERCENT LJNDER PACE SPEED ............ 10.5 RANGE OF SF'EEDS .................. 31. to 58 VEZHICLES OBSERVED ................... 86 AVEF:AGE SPEED ....................... 42.7 , , , 10 * * * , 0*** 31 41 51 61 71 81 + ..... + .... + ..... + ..... + ..... + ..... ~ .... + ..... + .... + .... 20 P 15 E - R - C - E - N 10 T - S - 90 80 70 60 50 40 20 20 , , ** , ** , **** ** -- **** *** -- **.~, *** , 5 ********* * 15 :31 41 51 61 71 81 SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR SI'REE1 ................. 0 Blk. I='AtJBA RC]AD LIMITS ................ EAST OF ~ VIA RAMI SPEE:DF'LOT D .[ RE:(: T' I ON ( S ) .......... E AND W BOUND DATE .................... ILJLY 28,1992 I'IME .................. 13:2_:5 1'(3 1445 POSTED SPEED LIMI'1'....50 ISI,IM. SF'[[ED NO. F'[]]. F'C'r. 3.3 5 6.5 6.5 34 1 1.3 7.8 35 3 5.9 11 · 7 100 36 0 0.0 11.7 37 2 2.6 14.3 90 38 1 1. :3 15.6 C - 39 2 2.6 18.2 LJ 80 4~ 2 2.6 20.8 M - 41 3 3.9 24..7 70 42 1 1.3 26.0 P - 43 4 5.2 31.2 E 60 44 5 6.5 37.7 R - 45 3 3.9 41.6 C 50 46 5 6.5 48.1 E - 47 4 5.2 53.2 N 40 48 7 9.1 62.3 T - 49 2 2.6 64.9 S 30 50 4 5.2 70.1 51 5 6.5 76.6 20 52 3 3.9 80.5 53 4 ~- .o 85.7 54 2 2.6 88.3 == 3 3.9 92.2 56 2 2.6 94.8 57 2 2.6 97.4. 58 ~ 0.0 97.4 59 1 i. 3 98.7 20 60 0 0.0 98.7 - 61 0 0.~ 98.7 -- 62 ~ ~. 0 98.7 - 63 1 i. 3 100.0 - P 15 E - R - C - E - N 10 T - S - 50'FH PEIRCENI' ILE"_ SPEED ................. 47 85]'H PERCENTILE SF'EED ................. 53 10 MPH PACE SPEEED .......... 43 through 52 F'ERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 54.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............. 19.5 PERCENT UNDER F'ACE SPEED ............ 26.0 RANGE OF SF'EEDS -:r'~ to 63 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... 77 AVERAGE SF'EE'D .......................... 46. :3 + ......... I ............ + .......... ~ ............ + ........... + ........ F ........ F .......... I ........... + .......... , 70 ** 4~ , ** 0 30 33 43 53 63 73 83 + ..... + .... + ...... + ..... + .... + .... + .... + ..... + ..... + .... 20 15 , , 5- ** *** ** --, , , *** *************** 33 43 53 63 73 83 SPEED IN MILES PER HOUR BathoF BeJrose Bc3je, Iric, SF:'EEDF'L.I_3r F'roclFam '.i3'I'F~[EZIF:T'. ............... 0 B].k, PALIBA IROAD LIM]:IS ................ WES"[ 8F ~l~ MEAL)BWS F'KWY DIRECTIC]N<,S) .......... E AND W BOUND DA I'E ................... ,]UL.Y 28 , 1992 1" I ME .................. ]. 450 TO 160~ F'OSTED SPEED LIMIT .... 50 CUM, SF'EE:D N[J_>.F~:][, F'CT, .~:, 0 0. [~- 1 . :3 34 2 2. '7 4.0 36 0 ~,0 zl',~ 37 0 0, 0 4,0 38 2 2,7 6,7 39 1 :1,3 8,0 40 i 1,3 41 4 5,3 14,7 42 4 5, 3 20,0 43 4 5, 3 44 2 2,7 28,0 45 5 6.7 34.7 46 5 6.7 41 · 3 47 5 6, 7 48, 0 48 :3 4 · 0 52. 49 6 8.0 60.0 50 5 6,7 66,7 51 4 5,3 72,0 ~ ,~ 4 3 77.3 5~ · _. 3 4.0 81.3 54 2 2.7 84.0 ~,~ -:, 4.0 88.0 56 0 0.0 88.0 57 1 1 . 3 89.3 58 2 '~ 7 92.0 59 0 0.0 92.0 60 3 4.0 96.0 61 3 4.0 100.0 58]'H PERCE:_NT IL. E SPEED ................. 48 85TH PEZRCENTILE SF'EED ................. 55 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 throuc~h 50 PERCENT IN F'ACE SF'EED .............. 57.3 PERCENT OVER PACE SPE~.D .............. :3~.:3 PERCENT UNDER PACE SF:'EED ............ 9.:3 8ANGE Of-' SPEEDS ................. 30 to 61 VE:HICt_ES OBSERVED ................... 75 AVEERAGE SPEED ....................... 48. (~ 90 C - U 80 M - 70 p - EE 60 R - C 50 E - N 40 T - S 30 20 * , 10 ** 0**** 30 40 50 60 70 80 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20 P 15 E - R - C - E - N 10 T - S - 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SF'EED IN MILES PER HOUR ITEM NO. 5 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Traffic & Transportation Commission Scott Harvey, Traffic/Engineering Technician August 19, 1992 Proposed "STOP" Signs RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to the City Council to approve the installation of 20 "STOP" signs per Exhibit "A." BACKGROUND: Staff has received several requests for "STOP" signs in the Winchester Creek and Winchester Collection developments, and for the commercial area bounded by Winchester Road on the north, Jefferson Avenue on the east, Via Montezuma on the south, and Murrieta Creek on the west. Staff field-investigated both areas and found inadequate vehicle control at 20 locations. Due to inadequate vehicle control and/or limited sight distance, Staff recommends the installation of "STOP" signs at the intersections listed on Exhibit "A" attached. FISCAL IMPACT: FY92-93 Install twenty "STOP" signs with stop bar and stop legend (20 @ $110.00 ea.) = $2,200. Attachment: Exhibit "A" - 1 - p wO 1 \traffic\agda\0819 0810 EXHIBIT "A" The following are proposed "STOP" sign locations: 2, 3. 4, 5, 6. 7, 8, 9, 10. 11. 12. 13, 14, 15, 16. 17, 18. 19, 20. Westbound Rising Hill Drive @ Winchester Creek Ave. Eastbound Springtime Dr. @ Winchester Creek Ave. Westbound Springtime Dr, @ Rainbow Creek Dr. Northbound Quail Creek Court @ Springtime Dr, Westbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr. Eastbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr. Northbound Quail Slope Dr. @ Oak Cliff Dr. Southbound Quail Slope Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr. Westbound Rainbow Creek Dr. @ Rustic GIen Dr. Westbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr. Westbound Rustic Glen Dr. @ Margarita Rd. Northbound Stonegate Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr. Southbound Stonegate Dr. @ Creative Dr. Eastbound Knollridge Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr. Southbound Creative Dr. @ Knollridge Dr. Westbound Knollridge Dr. @ Majello Ct. Eastbound Enterprise Circle West @ Commerce Center Dr. Westbound Overland Dr. @ Commerce Center Dr. Westbound Rider Way @ Enterprise Circle West Westbound Enterprise Circle South @ Enterprise Circle West pwOl\traffie\agda\0819 0810 ITEM NO. 6 I- 0 E o u) 0 '-I- I- o') o ,-- eq