The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About092393 PTS AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA Thursday, September 23, 1993 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: F~GSAL~E ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Hdliday, Johnson, Perry. Sander, Guerriero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (51 minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS Minutes of August 26, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of August 26, 1993. pwO8\traffic%cornrnissn\agenda\93\0923 O913 No Parkin~J Zone - Ynez Road north of Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Commission recommend to City Council to establish a "No Parking" zone on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to 540 feet north of Winchester Road. 3 Speed Limit on Maffiarita Road RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to City Council the approval of posting the speed limit of 50 miles per hour on Margarita Road north of Winchester Road to the northern City limits when the street is accepted by the City. Margarita Road and Solana WaY RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Information only. OTHER BUSINESS 6. 7. 8. Traffic Engineer'$ Report Police Chief's Report Fire Chief's Report Commission Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, October 28, 1993, 7:00 p.m., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA. pw08%traffic\commissn\agenda\93\0923 0913 ITEM NO. I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 26, 1993 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to order on Thursday, August 26, 1993, 7:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Guerriero called the meeting to order. Commissioner Perry led the flag salute. PRESENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Perry, Sander, Guerriero ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Holliday, Knopp Also present were Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber, Officer Mark Leggett, Division Fire Chief Jim Wright and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT Neal Cleveland, 28465 Front Street, Temecula, representing the property owners of the Kinko's commercial center, asked the Commission to consider opening up the red curb along Jefferson Avenue in front of the center, to allow one or two vehicles to park on the street or to allow limited parking (i.e. 15 minutes only parking). Mr. Cleveland stated Kinko's is requesting that their customers be allowed the convenience of parking on Jefferson for "quick stops" at this location. Traffic Engineer Marry Lauber said the City could consider a 15 minute parking zone as opposed to opening up parking along the red curb area. Ed Dool, 28657 Front Street, Temecula, representing Temecula Shuttle, provided the Commission with an update on the services provided by Temecula Shuttle and their request for funding to the City of Temecula for a new taxi-shuttle service. Chairman Guerriero questioned the amount of funds requested and what the funds would be used for. Ed Dool advised that Temecula Shuttle is requesting $100,000 from the RDA to fund a new facility and a computer/communications system. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Minutes of July 22, 1993 Chairman Guerriero requested page 3 of the minutes, Border Patrol discussion, reflect a statement made by the INS representative regarding the frequency at which the Border Patrol is stationed along Rainbow Canyon Road. PTSMIN08/26/93 -1 - 09/08/93 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1993 It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve the minutes of July 22, 1993. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Perry, Sander, Guerriero None Holliday, Knopp No ParkinQ Zone - Rancho California West of Front Street Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Sander to recommend to the City Council establishing a "No Parking" zone on Rancho California Road from Front Street to the western city limits. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Perry, Sander, Guerriero None Holliday, Knopp Truck/Semi-Trailer Parkino ReQuirements Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber advised the Commission he spoke with several different agencies regarding this issue and was told that they feel trucks/semi-trailers are adequately marked and do not pose a safety hazard to the general public. Chairman Guerriero asked staff to request information from state and federal agencies to assist the Commission in formulating a city ordinance to deal with trucks/semi- trailers being parked on city streets. PTSMIN08/26/93 OTHER BUSINESS 4. Traffic EnQineer's Report Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber reported the following: Regarding a taxi-cab ordinance, staff received very little response, however -2- 09/08/93 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1993 comments made by Police, Risk Management and the City Attorney, will be presented to the Commission at the September meeting. The Engineering Department is currently completing the striping design for Ynez Road, north of Winchester Road. This will include a request for a no parking zone just north of Winchester Road. The Engineering Department is working on the traffic signal timing along the Ynez Road corridor. The Speed Undulation policy was presented to the City Council and the policy was approved with a change from 75% to 65% approval required on petitions from the affected property owners. The Council agreed to consider Calle Pif~a Colada as the pilot project and a petition was picked up and the property owners are currently in the process of obtaining the necessary signatures. Engineer Lauber advised the Commission that he has been in contact with Cal Trans regarding the recommendation by Commissioner Perry that airport signage be placed on Interstate 15 and Highway 79 (Winchester Road). He said Cal Trans said they will consider the request but could not provide him with a time frame for their official response. The City will acknowledge the airport on the City's kiosk signs on Winchester Road. The City Council will be holding a workshop on Assessment Districts 159 and 161 on August 31, 1993, 6:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room. Police Chief's Report The Commission unanimously agreed to receive and file the police chief's report as submitted with no further discussion. Fire Chief's Report The Commission unanimously agreed to receive and file the fire chief's report as submitted with no further discussion. Engineer Lauber updated the Commission on the status of the Opticom System. PTSMINO8/26/93 -3- 09/O8/93 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1993 8. Commission Reports Commissioner Perry provided an overview of the first Traffic-Watch sub-committee meeting held in August. Commissioner Perry said that the committee is considering a radio broadcasted traffic program, hosted by a Public Works employee, allowing listeners to call-in and comment or ask questions about city traffic problems and Concerns. Chairman Guerriero asked staff to study the left lane on Jefferson, in front of the AM/PM mini-market, which gets congested and confusing during peak periods during the day. The Commission asked staff to study the left turn movements along the section of roadway from Diaz to Winchester Road. Staff informed the Commission that with limited staff this complex project could take many months to complete. Adjournment It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to adjourn at 8:25 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, September 23, 1993, 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Ron Guerriero Secretary PTSMIN08/26/93 -4- 09~08~93 ITEM NO. 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer//)~'/ August 26, 1993 Item 2 No Parking Zone - Ynez Road north of Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission recommend to City Council to establish a "No Parking" zone on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to 540 feet north of Winchester Road. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Engineering Division has prepared a Striping Plan for Ynez Road north of Winchester Road including County Center Drive and Equity Drive to its ultimate configuration. The ultimate configuration for Ynez Road will consist of five lanes; four twelve foot through lanes and a twelve foot two way left turn lane. The striping configuration on County Center Drive and Equity Drive will consist of two thirteen foot through lanes and a fourteen foot two way left turn lane. Parking will be accommodated on both sides of County Center Drive, Equity Drive, and Ynez Road. Due to the reduction of street width on Ynez, 540 feet north of Winchester Road, Staff recommends that this portion be designated as a "No Parking Zone". FISCAL IMPACT: 590 feet of red curb @ ~0.58/L.F. = $342.00 Attachments: 1. Exhibit "A" pwO8\traffic\cornmissn\agenda\93\0923 O913 v ITEM NO. 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer /~/P September 23, 1993 Item 3 Speed Limit on Margarita Road north of Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to City Council the approval of posting the speed limit of 50 miles per hour on Margarita Road north of Winchester Road to the northern City limits when the street is accepted by the City. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1993, Margarita Road was opened to traffic from Winchester Road to Rustic Glen Drive. A citizen notified Staff that a speed limit has not been posted on Margarita Road, north of Winchester Road to the northern City limits. Staff conducted a Traffic and Engineering Survey for Speed Zoning to determine if the existing maximum speed limit is reasonable. Staff found the 85th percentlie speed to be 52 miles per hour and the 10 miles per hour pace range is 43 miles per hour through 52 miles per hour. After acceptance by the City, Staff recommends posting Margarita Road from Winchester Road to the northern City limits at 50 miles per hour. FISCAL IMPACT: Install four (4) "50 Miles Per Hour" signs (4 @ 9125.00 each) = 9500.00 Attachment: 1. Speed Radar Study pwOB\traffic~eornrnissn~agende\93~0923 0913 Bather Belrose Boje, Inc. SPEEDPLOT Program !REET ................ 0 Blk. MARGARITA ROAD ~MITS ................ bet WINCHESTER RD~;~ and RUSTIC GLEN [RECTION(S) .......... N & S BOUND ~TE 9-14-93 2ME .................. 0900 TO 1000 ~STED SPEED LIMIT .... 55 CUM. 'EED NO. PCT. PCT. ~1 1 1.0 10 ~2 3 30 40 ~3 1 10 50 ~4 1 10 60 :5 1 10 70 ~6 1 10 80 17 2 2 0 10 0 ~8 7 7 0 17 0 ~9 5 5 0 22 0 l0 5 5 0 27 0 I1 5 5 0 32 0 12 3 3 0 35 0 i3 6 6 0 41 0 =4 6 6 0 47 0 ~5 2 2 0 49 0 16 4 4 0 53 0 ~7 6 6 0 59 0 ~8 6 6 0 65 0 ~9 6 6 0 71 0 iO 5 5 0 76 0 il 7 7 0 83 0 i2 5 5 0 88 0 i3 0 0 0 88.0 i4 3 3 0 91.0 i5 2 2 0 93.0 i6 3 3 0 96.0 i7 2 2 0 98.0 i8 0 0 0 98.0 i9 1 1.0 99.0 i0 0 0.0 99.0 il 1 1.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 46 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 52 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 53.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............. 12.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ............ 35.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 31 to 61 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... 100 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 45.3 100 90 C - U 8O M - 70 p - E 6O R - C 50 E - N 40 T - S 3O 20 10 ** + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + *** 90 80 * 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 31 41 51 61 71 81 + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 20 20 P 15 15 E - ' R - ' C - ' E - ' N 10 10 T - ' S - ' + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + ITEM NO. 4 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer//~ September 23, 1993 Item 4 Margarita Road and Solana Way RECOMMENDATION: Information only. BACKGROUND: At the June 23, 1993 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, Commission requested Staff to conduct a 24-hour vehicular volume study and install larger "STOP" signs at the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way. Due to public inquires regarding signalization, Staff evaluated this intersection using the State of California's Traffic Signal Warrants, Staff found the following warrants were satisfied: 1. Minimum Vehicular Volumes 2. Systems Warrants 3. Combination of Warrants 4. Four Hour Volume Warrants 5. Peak Hour Volume Warrants. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachment: 1. Signal Warrants 2. Tabular Summary of Vehicle Counts 3. Collision Diagram pwOB\traffic\cornrnissn~agenda\93\0923 0913 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING "DIST Major St: Minor ST: Critical speed of major street tratfk; >_ 40 mph ............. In built up area of isolaed community of < 10,000 pep .......... Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC E~, ~ CO RTE PM CHK ,kfng~C_~,7~ ~oAt~ CdticalApproachSpeed 50 L ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ C~ ~pma~ ~d DATE DATE Traffic Manual <~ -~? - c~t '4 ~ mph '/~' mph RURAL (R) URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - MInimum Vehicular Volume APPROACH LANES Born A~orcns. 500 MaWr S~set (400) H~lest Apprctl. 1~ ~ S)t (1~) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) ut. 1 2 or more ) 600 ~ 420 (2So) (4801 C336) 105 ~ 140 ( ) (112} 10O% SATISFIED YES 1~ NO r-1 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] WARRANT 2 - InternJption of Continuous Traffic MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80~e SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U ~ R APPROACH 1 LANES Both ~ 750 Mak~ S~eet (600) Highest Apprctl, 75 Minor Sb'eet (60) 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (42) WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume lo0% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or mere for each of any four hours or is190 or mere dudng any one Yes [] No [] houn AND There am less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to c~oss; AND Yes [] No [] ! The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 fest; AND Yes [] *No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street, Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily Justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or ether evidence of the need for fight, of-way assignment must be shown, Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9~2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS 9-7 WARRANT 4 - School Crossings WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ;, 1000 FT. N ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREE'R~ WITH ONE WAY TRAFF1C SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD 8E LOST Nat Applicable .......... [] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] SATIsFI .[] NO [] DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFTLLED S ft, E ft, W ft. YES [] NO E] ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CQNS'RTUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM WARRANT 6 - Accident Expedence SATISFIED YES [] NO [~ REQUIREMENTS WARRANT J FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT I - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME J SA~SP~E. '~"' .............. '/YEstea Non 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW ~ [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRIC,'RVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TQ REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY {~ [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & iNVOLVING INJURY OR _> $500 DAMAGE · MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ~ oR MORe I I [] C~ WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT SA~SFIED ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES YES [~ NO [] FULRLLED DURING TYpICAL~/EEI<DAY PEAK HOUR | -~ ~ G VEH/HR 1OoO VEH/HR .................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY S HRS. QF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR ' CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEMSERVINGASPRINCIPLENETWORKR3RTHROUGHTRAFRC '- VJ ~ RURAL OR SUBURBAN F~NY OUTSIDE OF. ENTERING, OR I'~AVERSING A ~ "* :-' " APPEARS AS MAJOR RQU'i"~ ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROLrTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS ~s I~ NO E] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily Justfficatlon for s signal Delay, congestion, confusion or other evldenc~ of the need for right-of-my assignmnent must be shown, 1-1991 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8 - Combination of Warrants REQUIREMENT TWO WARRANTS SATISFIED 80% SATISRED WARRANT ..... 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME - - 2. IN'EERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC Traffic Manual YES [] NO [] ,/FULFILLED YES-~ NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] Approach Lanes Both Approaches Major Street Highest Approaches - Minor Street One Hour * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Detay (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) SATISFIED YES [] NO [] 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NOr'q 2, The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving tane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume sen/iced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vDh for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume , SATISFIED YES [] NO [] Approach Lanes One more ,5'- (- Hour Both Approaches Major Street I[ J I ('7~ ' Highest Approaches - Minor Street ~/' ~'o.~ * Refer to g re 9-8 ~(URBAN AREAS) or F~Jure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal, Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment mum be Shown. COLLISION DIAGRAM ,.~ ~ ~-,--'P'~'---, ANC F~,CM __~..'~,' _.':: ' ' : ~ z ~P,~PAP, ED ~Y L WAY ~v ¢' 0 NUMBER OF ACC:DENTS PROP~SRTY DAMAGE ONLY . [N JURY OR FATAL TOTAL ACCIDENTS SHOW FOR EA. ACC:O~NT 1. TIME. DAY. OAT[ 2. WEATHER AND ROAD SURFACT'- - IF UNUSUAL 3. NIT~ - IF 8~'WEEN DUSK ITEM NO. 5 Traffic Engineer's Oral Report ITEM NO. 6 Police Chief's Report C t,y of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 J.Sal Mu~oz Mayor Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tem TO: City Council Public/Traffic Safety Commission David Dixon City Manager Ronald J. Parks FROM: Rick Sayre Councilmember Police Chief Jeff Slone Councilmember Patricia H. Birdsall Councilmember David F. Dixon City Manager DATE: RE: (9O9) 694-1989 FAX (909) 694-1999 September 15, 1993 POLICE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR AUGUST, 1993. The following report reflects the Part I Crimes, Traffic Activity, and miscellaneous activity occurring in the City of Temecula during the month of August 1993. As in previous months the Part One Stab are broken down by individual districts within the City. This provides a greater understanding of the criminal activity within the City for police staff deployment and for Council/ Commission interest. The f'wst drug identification program was such a success a request for another program was received. Persons interested in the subject are invited to attend. The date for the meeting is October 271h, 1993. The starting time is 7:00 P.M. at the Temecula High School Performing Arts room. With the start of the school year Officer Navarro will be returning to the T.V.U.S.D. along with a second officer who was assigned to the Temecula Valley High School. Officer Savala will be working the High School program. Both programs are jointly funded between the City and School District. Community based policing is here to stay. It is effective and one of the solutions to the problems facing our society. The Temecula Police Department is founded on these principles. Attached to this report is a sample of one of the programs that is in place in the City. Officer Fanene is our Business Watch Officer. Daily he is involved with business owners who present community issues that need to be addressed. I have attached a POLICE ACTIVITY REPORT PAGE TWO copy of his weekly report that reflects his activities. This is one of many programs that are in place within the City. Communication with the community is the key to communRy oriented policing. The Police Department is involved in a variety of programs that promote involvement and communication. In the upcoming months I will include material related to these programs with the monthly activity report. Temecula Police Department Monthly Statistics August 1993 September 93 Table of Contents statistical Information Map of Districts ..................................... Page 01 August 1993 Number Totals ............................ Page 02 Graphs Part 1 Property Crimes ............................... Page 03 Part 1 Persons Crimes ................................ Page 04 Activity Breakdown by District ....................... Page 05 Burglaries by District ............................... Page 06 Burglary Comparison .................................. Page 07 Arrest Statistics .................................... Page 08 Miscellaneous Activity ............................... Page 09 Traffic Violations ................................... Page 10 Traffic Collisions ................................... Page 11 Narcotic Activity .................................... Page 12 City of Temecula Part I Crimes by Reporting District August 1993 District C Persons 0 Property 3 Total __3 District D Persons 6 Property 15 Total 2_/1 District G Persons 2 Property 15 Total 1_/7 District A Persons 2 Property 15 Total District B Persons 4 Property 18 Total 2__2 District H Persons 3 Property 6 Total District E Persons 2 Property 9 Total 1__1 District F Persons 1 Property 8 Total __9 1 CRIME A B C HOMICIDE 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 ROBBERY 1 1 0 FELONY ASSAULT 1 3 0 TOTAL PERSONS I 21 41 OI BURGLARY 9 9 1 GRAND THEFT 5 4 1 AUTO THEFT 1 5 1 ARSON 0 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY I 151 31 GRAND TOTAL 17 22 3 HAZARD CITES 71 64 20 NON-HAZARD CITES 45 45 14 PARKING CITES 1 1 1 TOTAL CITES | ~ 17~ ~ 101 351 DIST. PEACE 8 18 5 SHOPLIFT 0 2 0 PETTY THEFT 2 5 1 VANDALISM 4 9 0 MISD. ASSAULT 1 12 0 ALARMS 95 33 8 PUBLIC INTOX. 1 1 0 DUt 13 9 1 T/C INJURY 2 0 0 T/C NON-INJURY FATAL T/C TOTAL T/C I lol el RESID. BURGLARY 0 4 0 COMM, BURGLARY 7 4 1 OTHER BURGLARY 2 1 0 VEHICLE BURGLARY 3 1 1 D E F G 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 2 0 6l 2J lJ 4 2 1 6 4 1 5 3 6 0 0 0 15l 9J 8l 21 11 9 50 9 3 26 3 2 3 2 4 79J 14J 9J 8 27 8 20 2 0 7 4 2 3 7 5 7 8 0 33 22 5 3 1 2 7 0 3 88J 71J 25J 2~ 21J 7J 8J 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 H TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 3 14 2J 3J 20 9 6 41 3 0 24 3 0 24 0 0 0 15J 6J 89 17 9 109 103 23 343 37 7 179 12 5 29 152J 35J 551 34 7 115 2 1 27 5 1 27 15 1 44 9 5 42 18 23 237 3 0 11 2 0 35 861 3el 538 i il B 60 0 lol 31 68 9 6 23 0 0 15 0 0 3 2 0 11 MISD. ARRESTS 22 19 1 34 7 6 15 0 104 FELONY ARRESTS 9 5 0 13 3 1 7 2 40 TOTAL ARRESTS I 311 241 11 471 101 71 22l 21 144 TOTAL ACTIVITY I 2681 2291 541 2091 1031 511 2671 651 1266 Page 2 0 0 0 0 0 C) a c~ (~ 0 · ~ 0 (/) rr ~ E O~ "T' ~ Z From: SSO L. Fanene 13 September 1993 To: Captain R. Sayre Subj: Business Checks in the City 1. The following new businesses were visited during the week of 07-10 September 1993. (New business application forms received from city hall): Kevin Smith Writing Services 42227 Stonewood Bldg 39 #F Westwind Pool Service 30567 Spica Court Conservation Products 43162-C Blackdeer Loop Ferris Tax Service 27393 Ynez Rd. #164 Kuebler, Thomas & Company 43500 Ridge Park Dr. #104 Sandefer, Smith & Associates 43537 Ridge Park Dr. #100 Muni Financial Services, Inc. 28765 Single Oak Dr. #200 Butterfield Electronics, Inc. 27533 Jefferson Ave. Brusheads 41443 Cour Beaune Audio Addiction 27495 Enterprise Cir. West Hartley Data Solutions 29753 Avenida De Calasada H.D. Vest Financial Services 27393 Ynez Rd. #164 Magazine Marketing Group, Inc. 28765 Single Oak Dr. #175 Ken Nichols Insurance Services 28364 Vincent Moraga Dr. #F Rancho Plaza Shoe Repair 28523-A Ynez Rd. Hill Counseling Consultants 29377 Rancho Calif. Rd. #206 2. The following businesses have been visited in Zone 3 this week. Lace N Craft Depot Thomas Bros. Market Executive Tailoring Hearing Systems E.P. Financial, Inc. Executors Escrow Country Christian Bookstore Country Inn Mostly For Men Fast Signs Taco Bell Family Dentistry We Can Do Beach Break Leonard's Carpet Service Entertainment Costumes Distinctive Decor 3. Completed 0__1 supplemental 10851 CVC reports this week on recovery vehicles in the city/county areas. 4. Completed 0__2counter reports for past 11-82 (late reporting of non-injury traffic collision) occurring in the city/county areas. 5. Mailed out monthly news article for month of October to Chamber of Commerce and Valley Business Journal. Topic: Telephone Tips for Kids (This is a cut and save article). 6. Attended meeting with Danny Feltenberger and Eastman Kodak representatives Drena Rogers and Linda Hirtle regarding upcoming "Tag & Brag" event scheduled for November 13-14, 1993. This will involve the Police, School District, City Hall and Eastman Kodak Company. This event will probably be held at Temecula Valley High School, pending approval from the District. Kodak will provide all necessary equipment for photo I.D. and fingerprints of kids that will be saved on laser disc. Disc will be kept at the Temecula Police Station. Next planning meeting will be held at Temecula Police Station on Monday, 09-27-93 at 1300 hrs. Invitations will be extended to the following personnel to attend the next meeting: Dave Dixon and Woody from City Hall, Jaye Hoffman from TVUSD and Chief Doyle. 7. Continuing to do follow-ups on any crime related incidents occurring to businesses in the city. Information is gathered from the routed yellow copies of the form "A" from patrol. Great response on the follow-ups regarding crime prevention tips from merchants. 8. Graffiti is still down. A few taggers and/or skaters graffiti reported off La Serena area. Still no graffiti reports from the school district. Gene Gonzales said they will periodically hire private security to watch the school sites on weekends and holidays. Brad Buron still awaiting paint sprayer. His crew has already started removing graffiti in the city. I am assisting him when possible, by getting permission slips signed for private property removal. Copy to: Lt Grotefend Lt Roberts Sgt Brown ITEM NO. 7 Fire Chief's Report J. M. HARRIS FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 · (714) 657-3183 August 3, 1993 TO Attn.: Re. : Temecula City Council Temecula Public Traffic Safety Commission Mr. David Dixon Temecula City Manager TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES August 1993 Activity Report The following statistics reflect the monthly fire suppression and fire prevention activity of your fire department for the month of August, 1993. August proved to be a fairly routine month, and so far this year, our local summer fire activity has been minimal. It appears that our local citizens are practicing common sense and safety and that our mandatory weed abatement has contributed to this lack of fire starts. The fires, so far, have been small. On August 6th, our department responded to a grass fire at Nicolas Road and Liefer. Several homes were threatened but none were damaged. We contained the fire at about 1/2 acre. On August 10th, a small grass fire on Camino Del Sol ignited a shake shingle roof on a nearby house, but our crews extinguished it quickly preventing any serious damage. A Fire Safety presentation was given to the Kiwanis Club breakfast on August 1 lth and was well received. A beloved friend to many Temecula citizens and our fire department passed away in August. All on duty and many off duty personnel artended the memorial service for Mr. August Fredy held at the Temecula Town Association building. Personnel from many fire departments attended including the Camp Pendleton Fire Dept. where Mr. Fredy was the Chief for many years. The border patrol also had a large number of officers attend. He was a great friend and supporter of our department and was a Temecula Volunteer firefighter for many years as well. At the time of his death, he was working on a book about the fire history of the Temecula Valley. He'll be missed. On August 271h, at 1435 hours, we responded to a brush fire south of the Temecula Creek Inn in the Rainbow area. The fire burned between 1-15 and last years big fire. Many resources were used and the fire was contained at about 65 acres. There are no other items to report at this time. Please feel flee to call Battalion Chief John Winder or myself if you have any questions about your fire department. We appreciate your support and concern for an efficient fire service for the City of Temecula. J. M. Harris, Chief Riverside County Fire By: Mark Brodowski Battalion Chief Temecula Battalion 0 ITEM NO. 8 Commission Oral Reports