The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About062394 PTS AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD: AT CITY HALL 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California Thursday, June 23, 1994 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Perry, Sander, Guerriero, JOhnson, Coe PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item n~t listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Anril 28, 1994 and Minutes of May 26, 1994 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of April 28, 1994. (Continued to the meeting of June 23, 1994) 1.2 Approve the Minutes of May 26, 1994. 2. Traffic Division Policy No. 02 - Median End Treatment RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve Traffic Division Policy regarding Median End Treatment as shown on Exhibit "A". 3. SuQgested Route to School Exhibit - Snarkman Elementary School RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and comment on the Suggested Safe Route to School exhibit to be supplied to the Temecula Valley Unified School District for distribution. COMMISSION BUSINESS 4, Marhill Circle - Blue Curb RECOMMENDATION: 4,1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for a Disabled Parking restriction at 29815 Marhill Circle. 5. Traffic Operations on Mira Loma Drive Adjacent to Vail Elementary School RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to City Council to establish a 270' "No Parking" zone for loading and unloading of passengers (students) adjacent to Vail Elementary School on Mira Loma Drive. 6, Pedestrian Safety on Rancho Vista Road in the Vicinity of the Temecula Community Recreation Center RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file status report for the Pedestrian Safety on Rancho Vista Road. 7. Pronosed Keen Temecula Clean Adont-A-Street ProQram RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council endorse the Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program. 8. Traffic Engineer'a Report 9. Police Chief's Report 10. Fire Chief's Report 11. Commission Report ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, July 28, 1994at 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION THURSDAY. APRIL 28, 1994 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to order on Thursday, April 28, '1994, 7:00 P.M, at the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. PRESENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Perry ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber, Traffic Technician Hasib Baha, Sergeant Jim Domenoe, Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski, Fire Chief Jim Wright and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT Laura Cannon-Behnke, 44528 La Paz Road, Temecula, spoke to the Commission about her concerns for the safety of Highway 79 South and the intersections at La Paz Road and Highway 79 South and Bedford Court and Highway 79 South. Ms. Behnke said the traffic has increased over the past couple of years and has made it difficult to exit from La Paz onto Highway 79 South. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Minutes of February 24, 1994 and March 24, 1994 1.1 Approve minutes of February 24, 1994. It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve the minutes of February 24, 1994. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 1.2 Approve the minutes of March 24, 1994. Chairman Perry recommended the Fire Chief's Report, Page 5, be amended by deleting the discussion of the Opti-Com System. PTSMIN04/28/94 1 5/11/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 28, 1994 It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Coe. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None TEMECULA NEIGHBORHOOD EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (T-NEST) PROGRAM Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson presented the staff report. He said staff evaluated the following options: 1 .) Continue to look for a volunteer who can run the program and perform the community outreach, or 2.) Consider a part-time position that would have T-NEST as the primary responsibility and community education resource for the Fire Department as the secondary responsibility. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to recommend to the City Council Option 2 on a six month basis with a status report back to the Commission in four months. Fire Chief Wright asked the Commission to consider amending the motion to make the six month trial period from the employee's start date rather than the date of hire. Commissioner Johnson and Commissioner Guerriero agreed to amend the motion per the request by Chief Wright. The motion carried as.follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Johnson, Sander, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY (RTA) BUS ROUTE CHANGES Assistant General Manager Steve Connell provided an overview of the route service, ridership, and projected route services. PTSMIN04/28/94 2 5/11/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 28, 1994 Fd DOol, owner of Temecula Shuttle, told the Commission he feels the RTA bus route in Temecula is inadequate. Mr. Dool said he feels a Dial-A-Ride would have been better suited to the City like Temecula. Mr. Dool said he has performed transportation studies to determine the needs within the City, however, RTA has declined to utilize these reports. Commissioner Johnson said he feels the RTA buses should drop off and pick-up passengers in all of the shopping centers (i.e. Lucky's and Mervyns) and advertise through the newspapers that RTA will be providing these services. Commissioner Coe asked why there is no route service along Highway 79 South. Mr. Connell explained there has been no interest from that area. Commissioner Coe suggested the RTA update their survey of the residents in the Rainbow Canyon area. Chairman Perry declared a recess a 8:40 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M. Commissioner Guerriero excused himself from the meeting at 8:40 P.M. PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL - "OLD TOWN" Ed Dool, owner of Temecula Shuttle, presented the Commission with a proposal for a Transportation Terminal in Old Town Temecula. The terminal would be located at 6th and Mercedes Streets and consist of the following: Transportation Terminal and Waiting Area Public Restrooms Temecula Shuttle Offices Ticket and Baggage Snack Bar Transportation Information Center Group Parking for five (5) coach type buses Parking for up to five (5) RTA buses or taxi cabs 102 total parking spacing Mr. Dool explained that Temecula Shuttle has a verbal commitment from Greyhound to serve as agent for their passengers and freight. Mr. Dool said the cost to develop the terminal would be ~101,400 and he proposes to ask the City of Temecula to provide the off-site improvements. Temecula Shuttle would then request a 20 year lease with two 5 year options. The City of Temecula would receive a percentage of the freight, ticket and parking revenues. PTSMINO4/28/94 3 5/11/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 28, 1994 Commissioner Sander asked Mr. Dool if he has presented his proposal to the City Planning Department. Mr. Dool said he has presented his proposal to Dave Hogan and Mr. Hogan said he cannot find too much that he doesn't like about the project. 5. "NO PARKING" TO FACILITATE EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report and provided a slide presentation of the island medians in the Lake Villages development. Jack Mowry, 30261 Via Alturas, Temecula, told the Commission no one parks on the street near the island medians. Mr. Mowry said he feels the red painted curbs are an eyesore and resemble graffiti. Traffic Engineer Marry Lauber said the red painted curb is accepted throughout the Country and he feels painted curbs have less visual impact than posted "No Parking Signs". Scott Chainberlin, 30233 Via Alturas, Temecula, suggested the medians be removed. Mr. Chamberlin said it would cut down on maintenance costs for the association and remove any problems related to emergency vehicle access. Engineer Lauber said Staff could provide an estimate on the cost of removing the medians, however, the majority of the Homeowner's Association would have to approve and finance their removal. Merle Miller, 30247 Via Alturas, Temecula, told the Commission there have been no problems with emergency vehicles during the past 17 years. Mr. Miller said he is strongly opposed to the staff recommendation. Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski told the Commission he recently was parked in the area of the island taking measurements and he was approached by a family who expressed their concern for the safety of the intersections. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Coe to continue this item and direct staff to report back to the Commission on May 26, 1994, with the cost of maintaining the medians versus removing the trees and medians. Staff was also directed to determine an acceptable approach to relieve the width restrictions on the street and to advise the Homeowners Association of the recommendation by letter. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sander, Perry PTSMIN04/28/94 4 5/11/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: APRIL 28, 1994 None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero ALL WAY "STOP" - VIA NORTE AT CALLE PINA COLADA Traffic Engineer Marry Lauber presented the staff report. Commissioner Johnson said he does not agree with the traffic counts and asked staff to perform. them ,again on another date. TRAFFIC DIVISION POLICY NO. 01 - HIERARCHY OF "STOP" CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Sander to continue this item to the meeting of May 26, 1994. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sander, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber reported the following: A Commissioner workshop will be held in October. The Commission was asked to plan to be in attendance. A Jefferson Street Sub-committee meeting will be held May 20, 1994 at 9:00 A.M. The previously scheduled May 12, 1994 workshop to discuss common goals and objectives has been cancelled to allow staff to report back. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT No report. PTSMIN04/28/94 5 5/11/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 10. FIRE CHIEFS REPORT No report. APRIL 28, 1994 11. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT Commissioner Coe asked for an update on Rainbow Canyon Road and the status of the right turn pocket at Highway 79 South and Pala Road. Commissioner Coe suggested the Commission pursue a name change for Highway 79 South. Chairman Perry advised the Commission the Winchester Road overpass is in the final engineering stage and will be funded very soon using RDA money. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to adjourn at 10:25 P.M. The motion was carried with Commissioner Guerriero absent. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, May 26, 1994 at 7:00, Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Ron Perry Secretary PTSMIN04/28/94 6 5/11/94 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MAY 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to order on Thursday, May 26, 1994, 7:05 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Ron Perry called the meeting to order. Commissioner Sander led the flag salute. PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sander, Perry COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero Also present were Traffic Engineer Marry Lauber, Traffic Technician Hasib Bahia, Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski, Sergeant Jim Domenoe and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve Consent Calendar. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sander, Perry None Guerriero Minutes of Aoril 28, 1994 1.1 Approval of the minutes of April 28, 1994 to be continued to June 23, 1994. Traffic Division Policy No. 01 - Hierarchy of "Stop" Controlled Intersections 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve a Traffic Division policy regarding the Hierarchy of "Stop" Controlled Intersections. PTSCOMMINOS/26/94 1 06/09/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MAY 26, 1994 COMMISSION BUSINESS 3. "No Parking" - to Facilitate Emeraencv Vehicle Access Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report and recommendation to establish "No Parking" zones on Villa Alturas, Loma Portola Drive, Santa Suzanne Place, Mira Loma and La Primavera Street adjacent to entry medians. Commissioner Johnson asked if the individuals who were present at the April 28, 1994 meeting to discuss this item, had been notified of tonights meeting. Traffic Engineer Lauber said staff had notified those members of the public who were present at the April 28, 1994 meeting. Commissioner Johnson asked the Fire Department representative to comment on the issue. Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski said he has no documents indicating any impedment to the access, however, there have been fires in the proposed area and the Fire Department has a definite concern regarding access into this area. Traffic Engineer Lauber said he has had correspondence with the Lake Villages Homeowners Association and they stated they cannot remove any of the landscaped medians. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Coe that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to the City Council to establish "No Parking" zones on Villa AIturas, Loma Portola Drive, Santa Suzanne Place, Mira Loma and La Primavera Street adjacent to entry medians. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sander, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero 4. All-Way "StoP" - Via Norte at Calle Pina Colada Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Coe to approve staff recommendation to deny the request to establish an All-Way "Stop" at Via Norte and Calle Pina Colada. FTSCOMMIN05/26/94 2 06/09/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MAY 26, 1994 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sander, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero Commissioner Johnson asked Engineer Lauber to send a letter to the Meadowview Homeowners Assocation Equestrian Committee to advise them of the Commission's action on this item. 5. Traffic Enoineer's Reoort Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber reported the following: Engineer Lauber said he was available to attend Homeowner's Association meetings. Updated the the Commission on Highway 79 South road improvements. The City is still negotiating with property owner on the Margarita Road improvements between Rancho California Road and La Serena. Advised the Commission of recent City Council action: Awarded a contract for the Ynez Road landscaping. Approved additional funding for the contract for Overland Drive. Approved the Commission's recommendation for "No Parking" on Rancho Vista Road across from the new Community Recreation Center (CRC). Commissioner Johnson said he feels a pedestrian activated signal at Southern Cross or somewhere in the location of the CRC is a necessity. Commissioner Johnson said Commissioner Guerriero has expressed the same concern, The Cal Trans Cooperative Design Agreement for the Overland Drive Overcrossing improvements was approved. Provided the Commission with an update on the Winchester Road overcrossing and ramps improvements. Chairman Perry said he feels the Winchester Road improvements should not begin until the Overland Drive overcrossing is complete. PTSCOMMINOS/26/94 3 06/09/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MAY 26, 1994 Commissioner Johnson asked Engineer Lauber to arrange a presentation on the schedule of improvements and impacts to lane utilization, by the representatives of the Winchester Road overcrossing project, for the July meeting. Commissioner Johnson asked staff to perform vehicle counts on the ramps and the overcrossing prior to the report at the July meeting. Chairman Perry asked that Public Works Director Tim Serlet attend that meeting also. Advised the Commission the City Council approved an urgency ordinance for licensing Taxi Cabs and will be re-considering the ordinance that was reviewed by the Commission. Advised the Commission that a Traffic Impact Study was received regarding the proposed Pechanga Indian Casino, however, the report is incomplete and the firm that prepared the report will forward an amended report. Engineer Lauber reported he attended a Non-Motorized Transportation Committee meeting which is working on bike trails and equestrian trails. Staff has modified the striping at Sparkman Elementary School to allow for left turns for buses out of the bus loading zone. A Traffic Engineer's Workshop is scheduled for October. Engineer Lauber asked those Commissioners interested in attending to notify staff as soon as possible. 6. Police Chief's Reoort Sergeant Domenoe reported the following: Updated the Commission on a recent shooting incident in the City of Temecula. Advised the Commission the Police Chief feels certain a new motorcycle officer will be added to the force. New forms and fee schedules for parking citations will be provided to the Commission. Reviewed monthly report. 7. Fire Chief's Report Battalion Chief BrodoWski reported the following: Presented an overview of the volunteer fire department's participation at this year's Balloon and Wine Festival. Provided an update on the status of Council's action to approve the addition of PTSCOMMIN05/26194 4 06/09/94 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MAY 26, 1994 one part-time individual to assist the Fire Prevention Officer. 8. Commissioner Reoorts Commissioner Coe asked the status of the weight restrictions on Rainbow Canyon Road. Engineer Lauber said staff is in the process of performing a classification study and will be finalizing that report and forwarding it to City Council on June 14, 1994. Commissioner Coe advised staff he received a complaint that the crosswalk at Hope Luthern Church on Rancho California Road does not allow adequate time to cross before vehicles are allowed to proceed on a green light. Commissioner Coe asked staff to provide an update on his suggestion for a name change on Highway 79 South. Engineer Lauber said he was advised by the Public Works Director this is an elaborate process, however, he will pursue the matter with Cal Trans. Commissioner Johnson asked staff to approach Cal Trans with a recommendation to modify the traffic signal for north bound traffic on Winchester Road to allow for a "through" and "left turn" arrow in place of the left turn only arrow. Commissioner Sander asked for an update on the Winchester Road/Nicholas Road signal. Engineer Lauber said staff is waiting for finalization of their plan check. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Perry declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, June 23, 1994, 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. CHAIRMAN RON PERRY Secretary PTSCOMMIN05/26/94 5 06/09194 ITEM NO. 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: June 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 2 Traffic Division Policy No. 02 - Median End Treatment RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Traffic Division policy regarding Median End Treatment as shown on Exhibit "A". BACKGROUND: The Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department is standardizing traffic operations in the City of Temecula. In order to convey information uniformally to the public, certain design features need to be defined for local implementation. These items are not specifically defined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Traffic Manual and should be to establish for City wide consistency. Proposed Policy No. 02 establishes sign configurations and locations for median island treatment. It also includes curb marking requirements for the median noses. In many instances median signage was positioned based on the standard sign height requirement of seven (7) feet for urban environments. The Caltrans Traffic Manual states: "Signs erected at the side of the road in rural areas shall be mounted at a height of at least 5 feet, measured from the bottom of the sign to the near edge of the pavement. In business, commercial and residential areas where parking and/or pedestrian movement is likely to occur or where there are other obstructions to view, the clearance to the bottom of the sign shall be at least 7 feet. The height to the bottom of a secondary sign mounted below another sign may be I foot less than the appropriate height specified above. Exceptions to these mounting heights are the FREEWAY ENTRANCE and DO NOT ENTER packages which are mounted lower to avoid sight restrictions and be most responsive to headlights. The FREEWAY ENTRANCE and DO NOT ENTER packages should be mounted with the bottom of the lower sign 2 feet above the edge of pavement. ONE WAY arrows (R10) should be mounted 11/2 feet above the edge of pavement." Based on the above guidelines, staff's recommendation is to install a combination of a "Keep Right" sign and a type "N" object marker approximately two (2) feet above the roadway surface to include painting the median nose yellow incorporating reflective glass beads. This sign height would be most responsive to headlights and not cause a hazard to pedestrians. This policy would recluire new and replacement installations to meet this standard and establish a program to systematically replace signs that do not currently meet this criteria. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Traffic Division Policy No. 02 - Median End Treatment PLAN VIEW /~>N,'/~,\\/,/\\/ .... ;, : ;:, :, ; ' , , , LEFT TURN POCKETS FLARED MEDIANS DATE INIT. CITY OF TEMECULA DATE TRAFFZC ENGINEER POLICY NO 02 TRAFFIC DIVISION POLICY MEDIAN ISLANO END TRAEATNENT ITEM NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer June 23, 1994 Item 3 Suggested Route to School Exhibit - Sparkman Elementary School RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and comment on the Suggested Route to School exhibit to be supplied to the Temecula Valley Unified School District for distribution. BACKGROUND: In cooperation with the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) the Traffic Division has prepared a suggested route to school exhibit as attached. This exhibit is a major component of a complete school area pedestrian safety program. The Caltrans Traffic Manual states: "Traffic accidents involving the injury or death of pedestrians are one of the most critical problems confronting Traffic Engineers. This traffic issue arouses significant emotion and public indignation when pedestrians are school-age children. Parents and civic leaders are persistent in their demands for more signs, markings, signals, and crossing protection in and around school areas and other locations which attract children. Accident statistics indicate that children are more often involved in non-school related accidents, They may be indicative that the standard treatments prescribed for traffic control around school facilities are effective. More effort is apparently spent on providing protection for children than on teaching them how to protect themselves. Adherence to these uniform standards and safety provisions is apparently a critical contributing factor to improving the overall pedestrian accident problem. School Responsibility: Problems about school pedestrian safety on the approaches to the school, raised by parents and others, shall be referred to the local principal for review and transmission to the appropriate staff person or to the school safety advisory committee. The principal or designated staff person of every school serving kindergarten and elementary students should: Develop, coOperatively with local officials, a "Suggested Route to School" plan showing all streets, school location, and the routes to be used by students enroute to and from school. School routes should be planned to take advantage of the protection afforded by existing traffic controls. This planning criterion may make it necessary for children to walk an indirect, longer distance to an established school crossing located where there is existing traffic control, and to avoid the use of a more direct crossing where there is no existing traffic control." FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Suggested Route to School Map ~\ ' CORTE SANC MILE RADIUS BUSSING LIMITS / / / PEDESTRAIN PATH NO SCALE 9 PRJEGO CLE ESPR4TO VIA RICCI VL~ RAYA VIA CARO VIA DENZO ViA NANZO ~ 0 SPARKMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEGEND: CROSSING GUARD SUGGESTED ROUTE TO SCHOOL / / / / SUGGESTED ROUTE TO SCHOOL MAP FOR SPARKMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATE: 6-23-04 ITEM NO. 4 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: June 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 4 Marhill Circle - Blue Curb RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for a Disabled Parking restriction at 29815 Marhill Circle. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division received a request to restrict parking between 29815 and 29803 Marhill Circle. Currently the resident of 29803 Marhill Circle primarily parks his vehicle along the somewhat level portion of Marhill Circle which could best accommodate for disabled access. Factors considered include: 1. Is the current disabled resident living at this address permanently. 2. Could the Police Department provide reasonable enforcement of a blue curb restriction in residential areas throughout Temecula. 3. City wide financial implications with respect to installing, maintaining, removing and verifying this type of restriction. 4. Input from other local jurisdictions regarding marking disabled parking on public streets. 5. Willingness of neighbors and the applicant to work together, unofficially, to solve the problem without implementing a formal restriction. The Traffic Divisions research identified the following responses to the above concerns. 1. As public officials for the City of Temecula, we would hope the current residence would live out their lives in Temecula, but there is no guarantee of this. Upon relocating, the curb marking must be removed. 2. With limited resources available to our police force, the enforcement of a blue curb, disabled parking restriction could be very limited. Patrols may be able to visit specific blue curb locations if they are dispatched near a location. 3. The City wide fiscal impacts of such a president setting decision could not be determined prior to this meeting, if ever. The impacts are unknown based on the information available to the Traffic Division from the California Department of Motor Vehicles and the 1990 census of population and housing. By contacting other local jurisdictions enabled my staff to utilize the experience of other transportation professionals from San Diego and Riverside Counties. The item listed above cover the concerns of all Traffic Engineering staff contacted, all of which have not implemented disabled parking restrictions on public streets within their jurisdictions. To step beyond the technical aspects of this issue and into the humanistic realm, I felt this community could work together to satisfy the needs of our neighbors. The resident located at 29803 said he parks his car in front of his house because his garage can not currently accomodate his vehicle at this time. He said he will be clearing his garage soon, and at that time he will park his vehicle inside. I asked if he would park on the west side of his driveway, and he said that neighbor had requested him to move his vehicle from his view. If the resident of 29803 Marhill Court could relocate his vehicle to the west side of his driveway temporairly, until his garage can accommodate it, the disabled person would have a greater chance of parking near his residence on a relatively flat portion of road. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Existing Availability of Parking / E3 ITEM NO. 5 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: June 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 5 Traffic Operations on Mira Loma Drive Adjacent to Vail Elementary School RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to City Council to establish a 270' "No Parking" zone for loading and unloading of passengers (students) adjacent to Vail Elementary School on Mira Loma Drive as shown on Exhibit "A". BACKGROUND: Staff was requested to review traffic operations on Mira Loma Drive adjacent to Vail Elementary School with respect to pedestrian safety. This request included marking existing crosswalks, bringing order to student loading/unloading, and keeping school access areas clear of stopped vehicle obstructions. As the California Vehicle Code states: .... Crosswalk" is either: (a) That portion of a roadway included within the prolongation or connection of the boundary lines of sidewalks at intersection where the intersecting roadways meet at approximately right angles, except the prolongation of such lines from an alley across a street. (b) Any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, there shall not be a crosswalk where local authorities have placed signs indicating no crossing." The marking of crosswalks are primarily used at signalized intersections, and stop controlled intersections located near schools, to reinforce safe pedestrian paths. Currently marked crosswalks exist at both the north and south ends of the Vail Elementary school property. The southern location, at the intersection of Mira Loma Drive and Rancho Vista Road, facilitates students access to the school ground on foot. Pedestrian indications currently are provided for all crossing directions as part of the existing traffic signal. This affords residence advanced pedestrian controls from the south by means of a concrete sidewalk on the west side of Mira Loma Drive. The northern location, with marked crosswalks, is located adjacent to the schools entrance driveway at Santa Cecilia Drive on Mira Loma Drive. Currently the Temecula Valley Unified School District provides a crossing guard at this location. This accommodates for adult supervision which facilitates student access for residence located north and east of the school site. Current driver behavior includes illegal use of red curb parking restrictions and double parking on both sides of Mira Loma Drive. This general confusion exists primarily due to the lack of driver guidance. Staff proposes to handle this on three (3) fronts, those avenues are: Institute a clearly designated student loading and unloading zone and provide for centerline striping. Communicate the proposed system directly to parents utilizing school district flyers and staff attendance at P.T.A meeting. Enhanced enforcement effort to reinforce both the existing red curb and new loading zone restrictions at the beginning of implementation. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Sign Account No. 100-164-999-5244. Addition of red curb - 75 LF at 90.58 = 9 43.50 Proposed white curb - 270 LF at 9 = 9156.60 No Parking Signs - 3 ea at 9125 = 9375.0Q TOTAL 9575.10 Attachment: Proposed Parking Restriction X Z Z LW ITEM NO. 6 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: June 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 6 Pedestrian Safety on Rancho Vista Road in the Vicinity of the Temecula Community Recreation Center RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file status report for Pedestrian Safety on Rancho Vista Road. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division was requested to research pedestrian safety on Rancho Vista Road in the vicinity of the Temecula Community Recreation Center (CRC). Staff was specifically request to include consideration of pedestrian activated traffic signals on Rancho Vista Road. Staff has also received a request for a marked crosswalk at Southern Cross Road on February 2, 1994. Staff has responded to the crosswalk requested to the satisfaction of the citizen, (correspondence attached). To properly address this issue, it must be established that a problem currently exists. To determine existing pedestrian safety, staff contacted both the Recreation Superintendent of the Temecula Community Services District and the Traffic Sergeant of the Temecula Police Department. Herman Parker, Recreation Superintendent, stated that he has not been made aware of any pedestrian problems and agreed to conduct a travel mode survey for the Traffic Division. Mr. Parker also stated that he didn't envision a problem of mid-block crossings, based on the large slope on the north side of Rancho Vista Road between existing intersections, The travel mode survey reinforced Mr. Parker' further allegation that he felt the majority of travel to and from the CRC is by automobile. The Police Department has polled the Traffic Division as to pedestrian safety to establish need for action of restricting pedestrian access from the north. With the existing topography restriction pedestrian access from the north and excellent sight distance at the intersection of Southern Cross Road and Rancho Vista Road, they do not feel pedestrians would cross illegally. The Police Department also felt the pedestrian signal controls at Margarita Road could facilitate crossings of Rancho Vista Road for citizens residing east of Margarita Road and on Argo Court. Until it becomes apparent that a pedestrian safety problem exists, staff feels it would not be appropriate to make any changes including pedestrian activated controls. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Letter Responding to Cresswalk Request City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 F~b~ry 2, 1994 (909) 694 1989 · FAX (909) 694 I999 Mr. and Mrs. Carroll c/o Markham Carroll 30372 Senela Place Temecula, California 92592 Dear Markham, I am responding to your letter dated January 27, 1994. As I understand, your concerns are vehicular speeding on Rancho Vista Road near the new Temecula Community Recreation Center. In addition, you are requesting a possible cross-walk near Southern Cross on Rancho Vista Road. As you know the speed limit at Rancho Vista Road is 45 mph. This 45 mph speed limit was established by an engineering and speed survey in February, 1991. A speed survey is performed every five years on certain city streets, providing the roadway features have not changed. I would like to summarize an engineering and speed survey as follows: A radar-gun (speed detector) is used at a specific location, usually mid-block, to detect the speed of at least 50 vehicles in both directions. Each block of a long street should be surveyed separately. After the data collection, the critical speed or 851h percentlie is calculated. The 851h percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85% of the motorists travel. The speed limit is based on critical speed. Speed limit should always be posted below the critical speed (851h percentile) in intervals of 5 mph. For example if critical speed is 46 mph speed limit should be 45 mph. I enclosed two informational sheets with this letter. First sheet is about speed limits and the second about crosswalks. Please read these materials and if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter you may contact me or Hasib Baha, Traffic Technician at 694-6411. Sincerely, Martin C. Lauber, P.E. Traffic Engineer Attachments: Traffic Information Program (TIPS) Sheets Ron Roberts, Mayor Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 6DEED LIM IT.5 WHEN WILL A LOWER SPEED LIMIT BE POSTED ON MY STREET? A common belief is that posting a speed limit will influence drivers to drive at that speed, The facts indicate otherwise. Research conducted in many parts of this country over a span of several decades has shown that drivers are influenced more by the appearance of the highway itself and the prevailing traffic conditions than by the posted speed limit. California's Basic Speed Law requires that: "No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is responsible or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is now 55 miles per hour. All other speed limits are called prime facie limits, which "on the face of it" are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prime facie limits are established by law and include the 25 MPH limit in business and residential districts, the 15 MPH limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad crossings and a part-time 25 MPH limit in school zones when children are going to and from school. These speeds are not always posted but all California motorists are required to know these basic 15, 25, and 55 mile per hour speed laws. Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 55 miles per hour may be established by local authorities on the basis of traffic engineering surveys. These surveys include an analysis of roadway conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers. If speed limit signs are posted for a lower limit than is needed to safely meet these conditions, many drivers will simply ignore the signs. At the same time, other drivers will stay within the posted limits. This generally increases the conflicts between faster and slower drivers, reduces the gaps in traffic through which crossings could be made safely and increases the difficulty for pedestrians to judge the speed of approaching vehiclrs. Studies have shown that where uniformity of speed is not maintained, accidents generally increase. CROSSWALKS WHEN IS A CROSSWALK UNSAFE? Apparently, whenever it is painted on the street! A number of years back, the City of San Diego published some startling results of a very extensive study of the relative safety of marked and uomarked crosswalks. San Diego looked at 400 intersections for five years (without signals or four-way stops) that had a marked crosswalk on one side and an unmarked crosswalk on the other. About two and one half times as many pedestrians used the marked crosswalk, but about six times as many accidents were reported in the marked crosswalks! Long Beach studied pedestrian safety for three years (1972 through 1974) and found eight times as many reported pedestrian accidents at intersections with marked crosswalks than at those without. One explanation of this apparent contradiction of common sense is the false security pedestrians feel at the marked crosswalk. Two painted lines do not provide protection against an oncoming vehicle and the real burden of safety has to be on the pedestrian to be alert and cautious while crossing any street. A pedestrian can stop in less than three feet, while a vehicle traveling at 25 MPH will require 60 feet and at 35 MPH approximately 100 feet. The California Vehicle Code says that a crosswalk exists at all intersections unless pedestrian crossing is prohibited by signs. Some of these crosswalks are marked with painted lines, but most of them are not. Pedestrian crosswalk marking is a method of encouraging pedestrians to use a particular crossing. Such marked crossings may not be as safe as an unmarked crossing at the same location. Therefore, crosswalks should be marked only where necessary for the guidance and control of pedestrians, to direct them to the safest of several potential routes. ITEM NO. 7 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent June 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 7 Proposed Kee :~ Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council endorse the Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program. BACKGROUND: Across the nation, civic organizations and businesses are "adopting" sections of highways, roads, streets, and center medians. These "adoptions" include not only litter removal, but tree planrings, center median landscaping, and graffiti removal. The proposed Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program is designed to enhance the community. The proposed program encourages and supports clean-up and beautification efforts by citizens and the business community. In addition to the enhanced clean-up efforts of the program, one of the primary goals of this program is to provide a means for youth groups to participate in and contribute to the beautification of their community. The youth groups are also encouraged to obtain a sponsor for their "adopted" location. The sponsor may provide support by assisting in the clean-up efforts or may provide a monetary donation to be used for supplies or any use the group may deem necessary. In turn, the sponsor's business will be acknowledged on the "Adopt-A- Street" sign. Initially fifteen locations throughout the City have been selected for the program. Currently, City crews can only service these locations on an on-call basis, at an annual cost of $5,600 for fifteen locations identified in the program to where the "adopted" locations will provide "clean-up" four times a year. The initial cost for the proposed program is approximately ~3,500 and include thirty speciality signs, trash bags, and Worker's Compensation Insurance. Costs for the second year are projected at t~2,000. Attached for your review and comments is a "Adopt-A-Street" program guideline. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Sign Maintenance Account 100-164-999- 5244 for the proposed program. CITY OF TEMECULA/KEEP TEMECULA CLEAN ADOPT-A-STREET PROGRAM GUIDELINES IN'rRODUCTION Across the nation, civic organizations and businesses are 'adopting' sections of highways, roads, streets, and center medians. These 'adoptions' include not only liner removal, but tree plantings, center median landscaping, and graffiti removal. There are two ways to participate in this program: Volunteer manpower and/or · If a business arranges to have an organization do the actual clean-up and make a donation directly to them and/or just make available all supplies. (i.e. orange vests, trash bags, litter pickers) LITfER, WED AND MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS REMOVAL · Participants agree to pick-up litter and miscellaneous debris from a section of roadside (no less than 1 mile, but no more than 2 miles) for a minimum of one year. Participants do all the debris pick-up on the roadside and parkway. Participants may not pick-up debris in the center medians (unless prior arrangements have been made). · Debris should be picked up from both sides of the highway. · Debris must be picked up no less than 4x's a yea~ (dates will be set up by Keep Temecula Clean Coordinator) · All org~niTations are requested to put litter and trash with home or business garbage for their scheduled weekly refuse colleaion. Arrangements can be made to have large pieces of debris transported to the City's corporate yard for dumping. LANDSCAPING · If your budget allows, this is encouraged. GRA~Iq'rl REMOVAL · If graffiti removal is necessary in your area we can supply the paint. RECOGNfflON SIGNS The civic OrganiT~tion or Business' name will be noted on two recognition signs for your project. The signs will measure 30' x 30' and may be mounted on existing poles at the select=,~ section. APPLICATION An application to participate must be completed and submitted to the Keep Clean. CoordinaWr at least two (2) weeks prior to the orgnnizations first scheduled clean-up. SAlyl~-rt' RULES The Adopt-a-Street Program is designed so common sense safety will prevail. No participant will be under the age of 7 years old. Adoptable sections will be selected for safety and appropriateness for the participants. Participants and/or parents bear individual responsibility for personal safety and appropriate behavior on the parkway. Each participant must complete the City of Temecula/Keep Temecula Clean CKTC) Clean- Up Volunteer Waiver Form. Participants will remove litter for the parkway/walkway area and will not go into the traffic lanes to remove liner. Participants will work without direct City of Temecula/KTC supervision and without traffic control. However, organizations are required to provide one adult supervisor for every five (5) minors on the parkway under the age of 13. City of Temecula/KTC safety requirements must be reviewed before entering the right-of-way. Adult group leaders are responsible for conducting a safety briefing for all participants prior to a clean-up. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS DO 2. 3. 4. 5. Wear bright comfortable clothes Wear comfortable shoes Wear gloves Place all bagged trash in trash bins Stay away from traffic and keep an'eye out at all times DON'TS Do not pick up broken bottles without adult supervision Do not touch anything that may be toxic/hazardous, i.e. oil, paint, gasoline No horseplay, distracting, or interfering with motorists Do not work if the road is under construction Listed below are suggestion for tools to brings with you when participating in an adopt-a-street project: 2. 3. 4. Leather gloves Shovels Rakes Water for drinking (especially groups with young children) KEEP TEMECULA CLEAN ADOPT-A-STREET APPLICATION Name of Adopting Organization, business or individuals: Person who can be contacted: Address: Telephone Number: Number of participants: Age of participants (Organization only): Cif you are an adult organization, you need not answer this question) List three locations you may wish to adopt. Start with your first selection: 1. 2. 3. Recognition Signs will read: Adopt-a-Street Program Next Mile(s) Adopted by: NAME OF ORGANIZATION OR BUSINESS There will be 2 signs located at each end of the adopted street. Please return this form to: CITY OF TEMECULA Brad Buron Maintenance Superintendent 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 -5- pw051roadsl-~dopt-pgm ADOPT-A-HIGHWAY PROGRAM LOCATIONS AND LIMITS Street Mercedes Street Moreno Road Front Street Rancho Ca. Rd. Margarita Road Ynez Road Rainbow Cyn. Rd. Pala Road Rancho Vista Ynez Limits 2nd Street to Moreno Road including side Streets Front Street to Front Street Rancho California Road to Via Montezuma Via Montezuma to Winchester Road Front Street west to City Limit Margarita Road to Meadows Parkway Moraga to Margarita Road Rancho California Road to La Serena Way La Serena Way to S. General Kearney Palm Plaza to Winchester Road Temecula Creek Inn to City Limit Rainbow Canyon to Wolf Valley Ynez to Mira Loma Rancho Highland to Pauba Mile(s) 2 I One side only I One side only 2 2 2 1 2 1.5 One side only 1 1.5 pwOS\roeds~adopt 011194 I \ i~LJ" CITY OF T~MI~3P~ e~R~p TEM~CU]~ CT.F.A.Mw CY,~.AN UP PROGRAM The City of Tamsouls ("the City") is sponsoring the "Keep Temecula Clean" Clean Up Program ("the Program") to remove litter, weeds and debris ~rom roadsides and parkways within the city. As part of the Program, private citizens may participate as volunteers in the litter removal. In order for persons over the age of 18 to participate in the Program, they must sign the following release which relieves the City from any responsibility for any injuries, losses and damages which the participant may receive or cause any other individual Or entity, including the city, ms a result of their participation in the Program. WAIVFa~ AND p~x,~x.~E FROM LTARILITY AND IMDMMNITY/~EEMMNT In consideration of being permitted to participate in the Program, I, , (,,Participante) do hereb~ agree as follows: 1. I fully understand my participation in the Program is permit~ed only because I agree tc waive and release any potential claims agains~ the City, its officers and employees. I fully understand that I will participate in the Program without direct City supervision and without traffic control which may subject me and fully understand the City'e safety ram n e Program and will comply with those requirements and will bear full responsibility for my personal safety as m Participant in the Program. 2. I hereby WAIVE and RELEASE any and all claims, rights and/or causes of action which I now have or may have against the City, its officers and employees FOR ANY ANO ALL CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, EaSSES OR DAMAGES which may occur to or be inflicted upon me or my property, including but not limited to those which relate to, or which may in any way arise out cf any negligence of the City, its officers and employees in connection with my participation in the Program. 4. I hereby INDEMNIFY and HOLD HARMLESS the City, its officers and employees from any and all CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, LOSSES OR DAMAGES to the person or property of any individual or entity which may in any way arise out of my participation in the Program. 5. X acknowledge that I am In good physical condition end am physically able to participate in the Program and am willing to undertake such participation at my own risk. 6. I am over eighteen (18) years of age, have executed this document on behalf of myself, the marital community which we compromise. and if married, I my spouse and 7. The contents of this document shall be forever binding upon me, my dependents, heirs, personal representatives and estate. 8. I HAVE READ THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT, UNDERSTAND ITS CONTENTS, KNOW OF THE TRUTHFULNESS THEREOF, AND HAVE ~EEN PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THE SAME. IN WITNESS OF MY AGREEMENT to the Toregoing, I hereby execute this document on the day of 19 THIS IS A RF.r. Fa~qE signature of Participant Printed Name of Participant Address of Participant City Phone Witness to Signature of Participant CITy OF TEM~CUxe~ T~Ct~.~ Cl'.R~!d~m CL~.AN UP PIK~B,M The City of Temecula ("the City") is sponsoring the "Keep Tamsouls Clean" Clean Up Program ("the Program") to remove litter, weeds and debris from roadsides and parkways within the tit fens may City. As part of the Program, private i participate as volunteers in the litter removal. In order for persons under the age of 18 ("minor") to participate in the Program, the parent[s) or legal guardian(s) of a minor must sign the following release which relieves the City from any responsibility for any injurieS, losses and damages which the minor may receive or cause any other individual or entity, including the City, as a result of the minor's participation in the Program. WAEV.:~ AND B~-~a~B, FROM LI~alLITY AND INDEMNITY AG~Rk~a~.NT (FOR VOLUNTBM UND~ ~1~ AGE OF In consideration of ("Minor") being permitted to participate in the Program, I, [we] the undersigned Parent, Parents or Legal Guardian(s) of Minor do hereby agree as follows: 1. I [we} fully understand Minor's participation in the Program is petitted only b.oa.s. to and release any potential claims against theits officers and employees. I [we] fully understand that Minor will participate in the Program without direct City supervision and without traffic control which may subject Minor to some degree of risk to his/her personal safety. I [we] have reviewed and fully understand the City's safety requirements regarding the Program and will comply with those requirements and will bear full responsibility for Minor's personal safety as a participant in the Program. 2. I [we] hereby WAIVE and RELEASE any and all claims, rights and/or causes of action which I [we] now have or may have against the City, its officers and employees FOR ANY AND ~J, CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, LOSSES OR DAMAGES which may occur to or be inflicted upon Minor, including but not limited to those which relate to, or which may in any way arise out of any negligence of the City, its officers and employees in connection with Minor's participation in the Program. 4. I [we] hereby INDEMNIFY and HOLD HARMLESS the City, its officers and employees from any and all CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, LOSSES OR DAMAGES to the person or property of any individual or entity which may in any way arise out of Minor's participation in the Program. 5. I [we] acknowledge that Minor is in good physical condition and is physically able to participate in the Program. 6. I [we] am [are] over eighteen (19) years of age, and it, married, I [we] have executed this document on behalf o£ myself, my spouse and the marital oommunAty which we compromise. 7. The contents of this document shall be forever binding upon me [us], my [our] dependents, heirs, personal representatives and estate. 8. I [wE] HAVE READ THIS Ea~TIRE DOCUMENT, UNDERSTAND ITS CONTENTS, KNOW OF THE TRUTHFULNESS THEREOF, AND HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THE SAME. IN WITNESS OF MY [OUR] AGREEMENT to the foregoing, hereby execute this document on the day of , 19 [we] T~S IS/~ pwTu~s~ Signature of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) Printed Name of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) Address of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) Ci=y Phone Witness to Signature of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) California Family Code Section 6901. Dental care "Dental care" means X-ray examination, anesthetic, dental or surgical diagnosis or treatment, and hospital care by a dentist licensed under the Dental Practice Act. California Fem¶~ Code SeCtAon 6902. Medical care "Medical care" means X-ray examination, anesthetic, medical or surgical diagnosis or treatment, and hospital care under the general or special supervision and upon the advice of or to be rendered by a physician and surgeon licensed under the Medical Practice Act. I[we], the undersigned Parent, Parents or Legal Guardian(s) of , ("Minor"), do hereby consent to the Minor's participation in the "Keep Temeculs Clean" Clean-up Program ("the Program") and should the need arise~ do hereby authorize the City of Temecula ("the City,'), its officers and employees to consent to any Medical care or Dental care ~o be rendered to the Minor in connection with the Minor'e participation the Pro am. (Medical care and Dental care are defined in California Family Code Sections 6901 and 690~1 copies of these definitions appear on the back Of this form.) It is understood that this authorization is given in advance of any specific diagnosis, treatment or hospital care being required but is given to provide authority and power to render care which may be deemed advisable. It is understood that effort shall be made to contact the undersigned prior to rendering treatment to the Minor, but that any of the above treatments will not be withheld for failure to reach the undersigned. The undersigned will not hold liable the City, its officers or employees for any Medical care or Dental care rendered to the Minor and will reimbur&e the City for any medical or other expenses incurTed in connection with the care of the Minor. This authorization is given pursuant to Section 6910 of the Family Code of California and remains effective until revoked, Parent's or Legal Guardian's Signature [arent's Phone Number(s) Date Physician/Dentist Name(s) Address(as) Phone Number(s) Is Minor taking any medicmtion? No Name of Medication(s): AIlergic Restricted activities are~ Yes ITEM NO. 8 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent June 1, 1994 Monthly Activity Report - May 1994 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of May 1994: SIGNS Ih IV. VII, A. B. C. A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S,F. STENCILING 139 new and repainted legends 2,796 L.F. of red curb new and repainted 4,200 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding 16 19 1 2 26 2 55,277 23 2,811 r:\roads\actrpt\94\05 06/06/94skg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - May, 1994 Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 26 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.Co failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 28 service order requests for the month of April, 1994. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 37 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the followinq: 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 0 L.F. of sand blasting · 0 L.F. of red curb · 0 new and repainted legends The total cost for Orange County striping services was $0.00 compared to $6,712.30 for April, 1994. PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the followinq: 59 sites, 479,110 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $2,850.00 compared to ~3,950.00 for April, 1994. - The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of May, 1994 was 4,881.00 compared to $27,138.75 for the month of April, 1994. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $4,881.00 $0,00 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer r:\roads\actrpt\94\05 06/06/94skg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - May, 1994 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December. NELSON PAVING AND SEALING Account No. 5402 Date: May 5, 1994 Emergency Street Repair Moraga North of Rancho California Road Furnish and place 3" of A/R 4000 asphalt material to construct street patching and sidewalk repair. Furnish and place berm material to construct 20' of 8" berm. Total S.F. 450 Total A,C. 8 Tons Total Cost $1,700.00 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Account No. 5402 Date: May 4, 1994 Moraga @ Temecula Elementary School Emergency Slope repair due to traffic collision - 4 hrs. D6H dozer - 7 hrs, 446 Backhoe - 16 hrs, labor - Lowbed Truck 4 hrs. - 8 hrs. labor - Compactor Total Cost ~2,931.00 ARBOR PRO TREE SERVICE Account No. 5402 Date: May 19, 1994 Remove and stump grind 1 dead tree from City R.O.W. Total Cost $250.00 r:\roads\actrpt\94~05 06/06/94skg DATE 5-02-94 ,5-02-94 ,5-03-94 ~5-04-94 k5-04-94 >5-05-94 15-09-94 15-09-94 >5-10-94 >5-10-94 )5-10-94 )5-11-94 )5-11-94 )5-11 )5-11-94 )5-11-94 )5-16-94 )5-16-94 )5-16-94 )5-17-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION LOCATION 30062 Pechanga Drive NS Rancho Vista Road Front of C.R.C. La Primavera @ Pauba 45366 Zuma Drive 41423Ave. de la Reina Pauba @ Butterfield Stage East of Pauba & Butterfield Target Center Calle Palmas Wrong Phone UTL East of N.Gen'l Kearney @ Sierra Madre Solana EIO Margarita Ave. de la Reina Ynez Road/Traffic Medians Solana Way 200' W/O Acacia Apt. Flood Channel @ Nicholas Road 30062 Pechanga (Calif. Sunset tract) Margarita @ Santiago Road 29920 Via Serrito 30062 Pechanga 27393 Ynez Road WORK COMPLETED MAY 1994 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG IREQUEST Drainage concern Install R-26-D/R-81 WO 94-024 Street failure Tree removal Tree removal Litter Litter Sweeper concern Broken fence Noisy manhole lid Litter Broken glass Weed concern Pot hole Children Playing in channel Drainage concern Debris on roadway Weed spray removal Drain concern Graffiti removed I WORK COMPLETED 05-03-94 05-11-94 05-04-94 05-05-94 05-05-94 05-05-94 05-06-94 05-09-94 05-12-94 05-12-94 05-16-94 05-12-94 05-12-94 05-12-94 05-11-94 05-17-94 05-16-94 05-16-94 05-17-94 05-17-94 pwO3~roads\wkcrnpltd\94\O5.svrq 060894 5-17-94 5-17-94 5-17-94 5-17-94 5-18-94 5-25-94 30443 Danube N/W corner of Rio Nedo @ Diaz 30939 Pina Colada 31635 Via Saltio 28100 Front 31181 Calle Alhambra Contractors removing sidewalk. Tree trim White Fly/Aphid infestation Sight distance problem T.C. debris removed Water leak 05-17-94 05-17-94 05-18-94 05-18-94 05-18-94 05-25-94 TOTAL S.O.R'S 26 pwO3\roads%wkcmpltd\94\OS,svrq 060894 CITY OF TEM ECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MAY 1994 GRAFFITI REMOVAL )ATE 15-02-94 )5-04-94 )5-10-94 )5-10-94 )5-10-94 )5-10-94 )5-12-94 )5-12-94 )5-13-94 )5-13-94 )5-13-94 ~5-13-94 35-17-94 35-17-94 35-19-94 05-19-94 05-20-94 ~LOCATION 31109 El Torito Court Nicholas Rd. @ N, Gen'l Kearney Winchester Rd. @ Murrieta Creek Bridge 4180 Enterprise Circle S. 27461 Diaz 28816 Pujol Winchester Rd, 600 foot E/O Diaz Winchester Rd. @ Murrieta Creek Jefferson Avenue @ Flood Control Pala Road @ Wolf Valley Ave. de la Reina @ Vista Bahia Winchester Road @ Flood Control 27393 Ynez Road @ Nicholas 31690 Rancho Calif. Road @ Butterfield Stage Road Ynez Road @ Pauba Road Stonegate @ Creative Margarita @ Rancho Calif. Road Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed WORK COMPLETED 63 S.F. of Graffiti 232 S.F. of Graffiti 75 S.F. of Graffiti 150 S.Fo of Graffiti 44 S.F. of Graffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 20 S.F. of Graffiti 537' S.F. of Graffiti 350 S.F. of Graffiti 8 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F, of Graffiti 45 S.F. of Graffiti 325 S.F. of Graffiti 36 S.F, of Graffiti 12 S.F. of Graffiti 1 S~F. of Graffiti 60 S.F. of Graffiti -1- pwO3~roads~wkcrnpltd\94\OS,Graffiti 060294 AFFITI REMOVAL - MAY, 1994 5-23-94 5-26-94 5-27-94 5-27-94 5-31-94 5-31-94 Solana Way E/O Margarita 29645 Rancho California Road C.R.C. @ Mira Loma Winchester Road 2 Diaz I-15 W/O Equity Via Dos Picos @ Diaz Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti 78 S.F. of Graffiti 480 S.F. of Graffiti 45 S.F. of Graffiti 128 S.F. of Graffiti 20 S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL 23 . LOCATION TOTAL S.F. 2,911 REMOVED -2- pwO3\roads\wkcrnpltd\94\OS.Graffid 060294 DATE ,5-02-94 ~5-04-94 ~5-06-94 )5-09-94 15-10-94 )5-16-94 )5-16-94 )5-16-94 )5-16-94 )5-18-94 )5-18-94 :)5-25-94 :)5-26-94 ::)5-26-94 35-31-94 35-31-94 35-31-94 LOCATION Front Street, First St. S/O Front Street ~ Del Rio Plaza N/O Jefferson N/B Btn. Rancho Caiif. Rd. and Winchester Rainbow Canyon N/B N/O City Limit Roripaugh Btwn Winchester and Nicholas Road Solana Way E/O Margarita S/S Solana Way E/O Margarita N/S Marg. Road N/B S/O Solana Way Nicholas E/S @ Via Lobo Calle Medusa W/B W/O Nicholas Road Calle Medusa E/B E/O Enfield Via Lobo Channel S. Gen'l Kearney @ La Serena Rancho California Rd. N/O Park Drive Rancho Way Btwn Diaz and Business Park Drive Via Dos Picos Black Deer Loop CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED MAY 1994 WEED ABATEMENT I Abated Abated Abated WORK COMPLE'FED ____j 1,200 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 6,192 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 15 L.F. of Sidewalk Abated 5,020 Abated 1,250 Abated 5,500 Abated 2,000 Abated 500 Abated 1,500 Abated 3,500 Abated 2,000 Abated 8.250 Abated 10,400 Abated 1,150 Abated 7,900 Abated 300 Abated 400 S,F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S,F. of R~O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R,O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O,W, Weeds S,F. of R.O,W. Weeds ,S.F. of R.O,W. Weeds S:F. of R.O,W. Weeds S.F. of R.O,W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W, Weeds 55,277 TOTAL S.F. - 1 - pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\94\OS.Weeds 060394 05-02-94 05-02-94 05-02-94 05-02-94 05-03-94 05-04-94 05-05-94 05-09-94 05-10-94 05-10-94 05-11-94 05-12-94 05-16-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED MAY 1994 STREET STENCILING LOCATION Rancho Calif, Road @ Lyndie Lane Rancho Calif. Road E/O Ynez Road Rancho Caiif. Road @ Business Park Dr. Rancho Catif. Road @ Front Street Meadowview area Meadowview area Meadowview area Meadowview area Meadowview area Area #4 Area Area #4 Area Painted WORK COMPLETED Painted Painted Painted Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint 275 L.F, of Red Curb 150 L.F. of Red Curb 1,040 L.F. of Red Curb 390 L.F. of Red Curb 7 Legends 11 Legends 11 Legends 8 Legends 6 Legends 6 Legends 13 Legends 7 Legends SB/SL Legends 10 PW03\ROADS/WKCMPLTD~94\05.STN 060194 ENCILING - MAY, 1994 5-17-94 Area #4 5-18-94 Area #4 5-19-94 Area #4 5-23-94 Area #4 ,5-24-94 Nicholas @ Liefer Road ~5-24-94 Area #4 ~5-25-94 Jefferson {~ Tony Roma's )5-26-94 Sparkman School )5-26-94 Sparkman School )5-31-94 Area #4 Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Grind and repaint Installed 100 L.F. of 4" White edge line. Repainted 941 L.F. of Red Curb. Installed 2 "Keep Clear" stencils. Installed 28 L.F. of double yellow. Repainted 3 school Cress-walks. Grind and repainted SB/SL 11 3 9 13 19 Legends Legends Legends Legends Legends TO~FAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 139 TOTAL L.F. RED CURB NEW & REPAINTED TOTAL S,F. SANDBLASTING & GRINDING OF STRIPING & LEGENDS 2,796 4,200 I>WO3\ROADS/W'KCMPLTD~94\O5.STN 060194 ATE 5-06-94 5-06-94 5-06-94 5-06-94 5-10-94 5-10-94 5-10-94 5-12-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETE MAY 1994 ! LOCATION __,.1 PO THOLES WORK COMPLETED Moreno Road @ Front Street Del Rio N/O Front Street Rancho Calif, Road between Front and Margarita Margarita S/B between Rancho Calif, Road and Rancho Vista Front Street and Main Street Pujol N/O First Street Rancho Calif. Road @ Moraga Solana Way @ Acacia Apt. 4 Cu. Ft, of Temp, AC 8 Cu, Ft. of Temp..AC 3 Cu, Ft, of Temp, AC 1 Cu. Ft. of Temp. AC 1 Cu. Ft, of Temp, AC 4 Cu. Ft, of Temp, AC 1 Cu, Ft, of Temp. AC 4 Cu. Ft, of Temp, AC TOTAL S,F, 26 PW03~ROADS/WI(CMPLTD\94\05,POTHOLE$ 060694 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETE )ATE )5-02-94 )5-03-94 )5-10-94 )5-10-94 2)5-10-94 )5-13-94 ~5-13-94 35-14-94 35-16-94 05-17-94 05-23-94 05-23-94 O5-24-94 05-25-94 05-25-94 LOCATION Rancho Calif. Road @ Via Los Colinas Via Norte W/O Pina Colada Pala Road (City Limit) Rainbow Canyon (City Limit) Rancho Vista Road @ C,R.C. Rancho Calif. Rd. (most Wstly) Jefferson Avenue (most Nortly) Call out TC Del Rey Road @ Buena Suerte Mira Loma (Most Wstly) @ Rancho Vista Liefer Rd. @ "Bridge" @ Nicholas Corte Almonte & Calle Veronica Ynez Road @ Pauba N.E.C, Lifer Road @ Nicholas Margarita @ Stonewood Puesta del Sol @ Avenida Verde MAY 1994 SIGNS WORK COMPLETED Replaced R-7 & R-7A "T,C." Installed Overlay Population Overlay Population New Install Overlay Population Overlay Population Replace Replace W-7A R-26-D/R-81 Combo (7) R-2 "35" SPS "T.C." R-1 SPS "T.C." R-1 AN-17 SPS New Install 2 N.H.W. Signs R-260 "T.C." 4 P Markers R-1 Faded S.N.S. Replace Installed Replaced Installed Replaced Repaired iI pWO3\ROADS/WKCMPLTD\94\OS.SIGN$ 060694 iNS - MAY, 1994 5-26-94 5-31-94 5-31-9z~ Rancho Calif. Rd. W/O Business Park Drive Margarita Btwn De Portola & Pauba Diaz @ Rancho Way Replaced Replaced Replaced R-48 & W-14 4 R-26-D W-57 Bullet Holes 2 W-11 Stolen Type "N .... T.C." TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 16 19 1 pWO3\ROADS/'~/KCMpLTD\94\OS.SIGNS 060694 ATE 5-06-94 5-06-94 5-06-94 5-06-94 '5-13-94 .5-14-94 ~5-16-94 15-16-94 >5-16-94 )5-16-94 )5-17-94 )5-18-94 )5-18-94 J LOCATION Jefferson N/B Btwn Rsncho California Road & Winchester Ynez Rosd S/B Btwn Winchester & Margarita Ynez N/B Btwn Winchester & Margarita Margarita N/B Btwn Rancho Calif. Road and Rancho Vista Pala (Btwn Wolf Valley & Hwy. 79) Call out (T.C.) Del Rey Road @ Buena Suerte Solana Way E/O Margarita SIS Solana Way E/O Margarita N/S Margarita Road N/B S/O Solana Way Santiago Road W/B @ Margarita Calle Medusa ~ Nicholas Road Calle Medusa W/B Nicholas Road Calle Medusa E/B E/O Enfield CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETE MAY 1994 DEBRIS J WORK COMPLETED Pick up debris 2 Bags Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 2 Bags Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag Pick up debris 1 Bag SOR/TC !1 TOTAL DEBRIS PICKED UP 15 BAGS PW03\ROADS/1NKCMPLTD\94\05.DEBRIS 060694 0 0 O '7 .,~ >' Q -r 0 O. 0 ITEM NO. 9 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT Ronald H, Roberts Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor Pro Tern Patricla H. Birdsall Councilmember J, Sat MuPioz Councilmember Ronald J. Parks Councilmember (909) 694-6444 FAX (909) 694-1999 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California92590 City Council Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ron Bradley City Manager FROM: Rick Sayre Police Chief DATE: June 16, 1994 RE: POLICE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MAY 1994 The following report reflects the Part I Crimes, Traffic Activity, and miscellaneous activity occurring in the City of Temecula during May 1994. As in past monthly reports the Part One Stats are broken down by individual districts within the City. This provides a greater understanding of the criminal activity within the City for police staff deployment and for Council / Commission interest. The photographing and fingerprinting of all participating elementary school children has been completed as part of the K.I.D.s program. The Police Department personnel is continuing to work with Kodak and School District personnel on the program. The joint group has planned a test of the system for August 1994. Residential Burglaries are down from both last month (April 94) and in comparison with May of 1993. Commercial burglaries are up slightly from last month. The SET (Special Enforcement Team) is currently directing efforts towards specific programs designed to target burglaries and auto theft. Bicycle Patrols remain in place in the commercial areas on high volume days and times and continue to be very positive in contacting citizens and deterring criminal activity. We received our first shipment of 800 MHZ hand held radios. Each radio has a voice MIC attached with a flexible cord. When you see the officers you will notice the MIC is attached to their person and they no longer have to remove the radio from its holder to communicate. Temecula Police Department Monthly Statistics May 1994 June 94 Table of Contents Statlstical Information Map of Districts ..................................... Page 01 May 1994 Number Totals ............................... Page 02 Graphs Part 1 Property Crimes ............................... Page 03 Part 1 Persons Crimes ................................ Page 04 Activity Breakdown by District ....................... Page 05 Burglaries by District ............................... Page 06 Burglary Comparison .................................. Page 07 Arrest Statistics .................................... Page 08 Miscellaneous Activity ............................... Page 09 Traffic Violations ................................... Page 10 Traffic Collisions ................................... Page 11 Narcotic Activity .................................... Page 12 City of Temecula Part I Crimes by Reporting District May 1994 District Persons Property Total District D Persons 0 Property 17 Total 1_/7 District e Persons 1 Property 10 Total 1_!1 District l Persons 2 Property 18 ~otal 20 District B Persons 7 Property 5 Total ~2 District Persons Property Total District E Persons 6 Property Total ,18 District F Persons 2 Property 4 Total J CRIME A B C HOMICIDE 0 0 RAPE 0 0 ROBBERY 2 1 FELONY ASSAULT 0 6 TOTAL PERSONS | 21 71 BURGLARY 8 2 GRAND THEFT 7 2 AUTO THEFT 3 1 ARSON 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY GRAND TOTAL 20 12 HAZARD CITES 34 16 NON-HAZARD CITES 33 41 PARKING CITES 11 7 TOTAL CITES I 781 641 DIST. PEACE 9 29 SHOPLIFT 0 1 PETTY THEFT 6 8 VANDALISM 4 3 MISD. ASSAULT 2 9 ALARMS 85 35 PUBLIC INTOX. 1 8 DUI 4 5 TOTAL i 1111 981 T/C INJURY 2 0 FATAL T/C TOTAL T/C I 2ol t 21 RESID, BURGLARY 0 0 COMM. BURGLARY 5 2 OTHER BURGLARY 3 0 VEHICLE BURGLARY 2 2 FELONY ARRESTS TOTAL ARRESTS | 111 D E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 3 5 2 2 0 1 5i 17~ 5 17 73 44 14 13 4 14 911 711 2 15 3 11 1 11 1 12 0 5 4 30 0 2 2 0 13 861 °i[ 21 0 2 201 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 2 F G H TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 5 2 1 0 14 61 2 tl 01 ts 3 2 4 1 29 3 1 5 1 27 6 I 1 0 16 0 0 0 0 1 t21 41 tol 21 73 18 6 11 2 91 19 16 100 21 323 11 13 22 6 153 8 4 1 1 50 381 33l t23l 28l 526 25 7 29 7 123 0 0 2 1 18 3 1 10 1 41 4 3 13 3 43 7 4 10 2 39 32 13 31 40 270 3 1 1 0 16 1 2 4 I 19 751 3t tool 551 569 3 0 4 il15 1: 3 1: 83 0 0 ~7I 31 t61 81 98 2 1 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 1 1 3 1 11 1 0 2 9 18 371 6l 351 231 tel 131 91 152 TOTAL ACTIVITY | 2291 1861 ttll 1941 t481 731 2501 931 1284 Page 2 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 r,,.) o 0 0 0 C~ 0 0 0 0 f'~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 CO ~ ITEM NO. 10 FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT J. M. HARRIS FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183 June 5, 1994 TO : Temecula City Council Temecula Public Traffic / Safety Commission Attn. : Ronald Bradley Temecula City Manager Re. : TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES May 1994 Activity Report The following statistics reflect the monthly fire suppression and fire prevention activity of your fire department for the month of May, 1994. Fire season was officially declared on May 30th. There have been a few grass fires in the Temecula area, but they have been contained to less than 1/4 acre each. Weed abatement in the City and surrounding county areas is in full swing, and many of the critical areas have already been cleared by disking or mowing. Public relations activities continued with ten station tours, two school programs, and two static displays within Temecula. The old Redhawk sales office located on Redhawk Parkway near Highway 79 South caught fire on May 14th. at 2:15 a.m. The building presented itself as a simple woodframe / stucco Spanish style building with red roof tiles. As the incident progressed, many fire behavior traits uncommon to ordinary construction was observed by the fire crews at scene. As it turned out, the outer building was a shell that actually housed a double wide mobile home. Because of this, extra time and care was required to locate and extinguish the fire. Thank you for your support of the fire services in Temecula. Please contact John Winder or me if you should have any questions. J. M.Harris, Chief Riverside County Fire By: Mark Bredowski Battalion Chief Temecula Battalion printed on recycled paper ~ TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY INCIDENT STATISTICS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION Month May Year 1994 FIRE CONTROL ACTIVITIES Structure Fires Vehicle Fires Vegetation Fires Other Fires Medical Aids Traffic Collisions False Alarms Fire Menace Standby PSA's Assists and Covers TOTALS 8TATION #12 8TATION #73 TOTAL 1 5 6 4 1 5 4 1 5 7 1 8 94 57 151 27 12 39 20 9 29 1 6 7 6 10 16 19 33 52 183 135 318 STATION FIRE PREVENTION Community Activities School Programs Fairs and Displays Company Inspections LE-38 Inspections Fire Investigation Burning Permits Issued TOTALS STATION STATION TOTAL 13 13 2 - 2 1 1 62 113 175 850 - 850 3 - 3 24 - 24 954 114 1068 TOTAL HOURS B15-1 (6/92) By: Mark Brodowski, BC Date: 6/8/94 :;"i:::'li!i['.:-", .~ 0 LL (,.) 0 --- / 0 0 > ~ a~ > 0 < G