HomeMy WebLinkAbout092294 PTS AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California
Thursday, September 22,1994 - 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL:
COMMISSIONERS: Perry, Sander, Guerriero,
Johnson, Coe
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that
are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to
the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled
out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before
the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by
one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar
for separate action.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of July 28. 1994
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 28, 1994.
(Continued to the meeting of October 27, 1994)
1.2 Approve the Minutes of August 25, 1994.
(Continued to the meeting of October 27, 1994)
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Parking on Vallejo Avenue near Rancho Community Church
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission re~affirm its' prior decision not to establish
a "No Parking" zone on Vallejo Avenue or Palma Drive.
3. Speed Limit - Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Calle Medusa
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and fde this report updating the posted
speed limit on Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Calle Medusa.
4. Street Closure/Modification Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to the City Council to adopt the
attached "Street Closure/Modification Policy".
5. Establish Specific Dates for the November and December Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Meetings.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission establish specific meeting dates for the months
of November and December, 1994 to avoid potential holiday conflicts.
6. Traffic Engineer's Report
7. Police Chief's Report
8. Fire Chief's Report
9. Commission Report
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on
Thursday, October 27, 1994 at 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Main Conference Room, 43174 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ITEM NO. I
ITEM NO. 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer 'f////
DATE: September 22, 1994
SUBJECT: Item 2
Parking on Vallejo Avenue near Rancho Community Church
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission re-affirm its' prior decision not to establish a "No Parking"
zone on Vallejo Avenue or Patina Drive.
BACKGROUND:
This item was previously requested for review at the Public/Traffic Safety Commission by a resident
located on Vallejo Avenue across from the Rancho Community Church. The request, at that time, was
for a no parking zone to restrict vehicles from parking off the existing pavement, on City right-of-way,
which is being maintained by the home owner.
The attached letter identifies the concerns of the Los Ranchitos Home Owners Association. Although
staff feels that these issues have been discussed and the appropriate entities were notified of our meeting,
a second review could be accommodated.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Letter from Los Ranchitos Home Owners Association
r:\tn~fflc\commi~n\agenda\94\0922/ajp
Los Ranchitos
Architectural and Environmental Control Committee
P.O. Box 471 * Rancho California, CA 92390
August 18, 1994
Tim Serlet
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association
Request for No Parking on Vallejo Avenue
Dear Tim:
The Association had requested this issue be heard before the
Transportation/Public Safety Commission sometime ago and it was in
fact heard at the March meeting.
I was unable to attend at that time due to a prior commitment and
very short notice of the hearing itself. As a result I requested
that the item be reheard and have spoken with Marty Lauber on
several occasions and have spoken with Chairman Ron Perry on
several occasions. Additionally neither the church nor the
abutting property owner, Mr. Cianfarini, were not noticed of the
hearing and as a result there was no one in attendance at the
hearing.
With this in mind I would like to go on record requesting once
again that the case be rescheduled and give all the participants
the opportunity to be noticed and to be heard. I have attached the
Staff Report and the minutes for your review, and as you can see
the conversation centered more around landscaping issues than it
did parking issues.
I will be setting up an internal meeting with Mr. Cianfarin~ and
the pastor from the church, Jay Beckley, to attempt to resolve
their issues and I will keep you informed on the status of that
effort.
Please feel free to call upon me if you have any questions or
require any clarifications.
Sincerely,
La y~d~e. m
LRM/j ag
cc: Dominic Cianfarini
Pastor Jay Beckley
ITEM NO. 3
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Marty Lauber, Traff~c Engineer
DATE:
September 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Item 3
Speed Limit - Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Calle Medusa
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file this report updating the posted speed limit on
Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Calle Medusa.
BACKGROUND:
Nicolas Road has recently been improved from a two-lane roadway to a full width arterial (86' wide) with
four through lanes, bike lanes and a striped median with left turn lanes at intersections. The new
construction extends from Winchester Road to 500' east of Via Lobo.
The Traffic Division has conducted a Traffic and Engineering survey to determine the appropriate posted
speed limit because recent improvements have made dramatic changes to lane configurations and roadway
geometrics. Also, in order to enforce posted speed limits, a Traffic and Engineering survey must be
conducted within a five year period per Section 40803(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
Most surveys throughout Temecula were conducted by an independent consulting firm in February, 1991.
This review is the beginning of the systematic updating of all existing speed zones.
Speed Trap Evidence
40803.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of
the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or
road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the
evidence or testimony is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section
40802.
Posted speed limits are primarily based on an analysis of a sampling of speeds (851h percentile) surveyed.
Section 627 of the CVC defines Engineering and Traffic Survey as:
Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey", as used in this code, means a survey of highway and
traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation
for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary
by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The table below shows survey data collected in February, 1991 and September, 1994.
Nicolas Road
Winchester Road to N. General Kearny
N. General Kearny to Via Lobo
Via Lobo To Calle Medusa
I February, 1991 I September 1994
52 MPH 53 MPH
57 MPH 55 MPH
54 MPH 54 MPH
The currently posted speed limit is 50 MPH. There is no existing history of accidents susceptible to
correction by reduced speeds. Because there are no unusual or unexpected roadway features, staff
recommends filing the appropriate paper work with the courts to continue the existing speed limit. Staff
will place additional 50 MPH speed limit signs as needed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ITEM NO. 4
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Marty Lanber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:
September 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Item 4
Street Closure/Modification Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the attached "City of
Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets".
BACKGROUND:
This policy was previously presented to the Commission in draft form for review and comment. A few
items were discussed and requested to be incorporated into a final draft to be brought back for
Commission approval. The Traffic Division recommended that specific wording changes be submitted
prior to September 13, 1994 for incorporation, providing staff with clear direction. Commissioner
Guerriero was contacted to solicit input since he was absent from the Commission meeting of August 25,
1994.
The attached document, "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public
Streets", identifies staff's effort to include all items discussed at our meeting because no written changes
were received.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
CITY OF TEMECULA
POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION
OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS
Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all "official traffic control devices" authorized
by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods authorized in particular circumstances might
include traffic islands, curbs, traffm barriers, or other roadway design features, removing or relocation
traffic signals and one-way traffic flow.
CRITERIA
A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re-opening
previously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meeting all of the following
criteria:
a. The street must be classified as a "local street" based on the City's Circulation Element of the
General Plan.
b. The street should be primarily residential in nature.
c. Traffic volumes on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a complete
closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles per day.
d. Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public safety
concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification.
An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow
modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets which may
be impacted by diverted traffic.
f. The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the City.
All persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or traffic flow modification
acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly
associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding
of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow
modifications.
h. The requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law.
PETITION REO UIREMENTS
The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City:
The City Traffic Engineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated impacts of the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. This review will include, but will not
be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, the
type of road or street involved, compliance with engineering regulations, existing traffm
conditions, projected traffic conditions, the potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets,
the increased liability exposure for the City or conflicts with future planned improvements.
-1- r:\tnfffic\policyXalclosure-O81941ajp
The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of the "affected area" to be petitioned.
The affected area will include but not bc limited to those properties where normal travel
routes to and from the "affected area" are tc ~c altered by the street closure or traffic flow
modifications, and/or properties which are significantly impacted by traffic that is to be
diverted.
The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be supported by
a minimum of 85 percent of the total number of citizens residence directly affected by the
proposed changes in traffic flow, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. The citizens
a~c,u!~ residence include property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home park
residents within the "affected area" who might be significantly affected by the proposed traffic
flow modifications or street closure. Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all
affected parties. At a minimum, 95 percent of all affected persons who may need to use the
street(s) on a daily basis must be contacted for the petition to be accepted by the City. This
requirement will be satisfied by signatures from 95 percent of the affected parties indicating
support or non-support for the street closure or traffic flow modifications.
d. At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following:
A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that
they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or
traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements
needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications.
A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic flow
modifications and the boundary of the aroa in which traffic could potentially be affected
"affected area" must be provided. The drawing must include changes in traffic patterns
anticipated as result of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
· The petition language must also clearly explain the location and nature of the proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications.
The petition language and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by the City
Traffic Engineer prior to circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to be clearly
understood.
· A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizing such street closure or traffic
flow modifications must be provided.
A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this policy.
PETITION REVIEW PROCESS
The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a proposed street closure or
traffic flow modifications:
The City Traffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all petition
requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is authorized by
State law. Any petition not complying with these requirements will not be accepted for
consideration. Ifthcpetitioncontainsallofthcrequiredinformationunderthispolicy, alc, ttcr
will be sent out to all who signed the petition, affected property owners, and long term tenants
such as mobile home park residents requesting verification of their support or opp~ition to
-2- r:\traffic~pollcy~stclosure-O81941ajp
the proposed str~X closure or traffic flow modifications by signing a signantre sheet that is
included in the letter.
If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed street
closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public agencies in
conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable, these agencies will
include all City Departments, the local office of the California Highway Patrol, County Sheriff
and Fire Departments, Riverside County Public Works Agency, all affected local utility
companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit Agency, the local
office of California Department of Transportation and any other agencies affected by the
requested closure or traffm flow modification.
If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the street
closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of streets may be accomplished by
several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which all petitioners, affected
property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home park residents will be invited
to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow modifications or street closure has
been received and verified by the City. The purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to
determine the method that has the greatest community support.
CITY ACTION ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFlqC FLOW MODIFICATION REQUESTS
Once a petition contains all of the required information and all of the matters described above under
"Petition Review Process" have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare a report with
recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for the project. Project
alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or permanent street closure or traffic
flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Public/Traffic Safety Commission will review the street
closure or traffic flow modifications request, any environmental review document prepared for the
project, all public agency referral responses received during the environmental review process, and the
results of the technical staff review. The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission may
support or recommend against the street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission recommends against the street closure or traffic flow modifications, that action will be final
and then the City Traffic Engineer will notify all petitioners. If the request is recommended for further
consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after making any necessary findings,
establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or traffm flow modifications.
The City will typically, when the City Council is contemplating a potential street closure or traffic flow
modifications, follow the process outlined below:
A letter explaining the street closure or traffic flow modifications and the time and place when
the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all petitioners, property owners,
within the affected area prior to its installation.
All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying motorists
of upcoming Public Hearing.
c. A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be given.
Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street closure or
traff'~c modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs giving notice of the street
closure or traff'~c flow modifications will also be erected at least two weeks prior to the date
of implementation of the street closure or traffic modifications.
A letter explaining the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all affected
petitioners, property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home park residents within
the affected area.
The City Council has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify, continue or
deny any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any support or lack thereof via
the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or deny a street closure or traffic flow
modifications request will be by adoption of a formal resolution.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PETITION TO CLOSE OR MODWY THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON STREET
BETWEEN AND
BY THE INSTALLATION OF (Nature of Changes)
AT (Location)
DATE:
BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, KMO~?/UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT
IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CITY'S STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC
FLOW MODIFICATION POLICY.
We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of
Temecula to on Siteel as
shown on the attached drawing.
All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in
all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the
funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modification.
The specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications
is/are section states:
All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted by the
proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map.
Our designated contact person is:
Phone:
Signature Print Name Print Address
APPENDIX "A"
RULES AND REGULATIONS: SUBJECT MATTER
22100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution regarding the
following matters:
a. Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the highways.
b. Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passenger vehicles
for hire.
c. Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers.
d. Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of
Section 21400.
e. Regulating traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such
duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise
inoperable, at the scenes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic
direction for orderly traffic flow.
No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local
authority has submitted to the commissioner or to the chief law enforcement officer exercising jurisdiction
in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for
review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until
the commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer approves the proposed program. The
commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he
reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assigned to perform
the duty described in this subdivision.
Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons
authorized for such duty by the local authority.
Licensing and regulating the operation of two truck service or two truck drivers whose
principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority,
excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's two vehicle licensed under
Section 11505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing agency licensed under Chapter 11
(commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its
registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and
county pursuant to Section 12111.
h,
Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically
disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks.
Providing for the appointment of nonstudent school crossing guards for the protection of
persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning
thereafter to a place of safety.
Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection
by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority.
-6- r:~traf~c\pollcy\stcloeur~-OS1941ajp
Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall
regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a
traffic control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected
area, within a specified time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate
written notice that further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance
or resolution. No person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this
subdivision unless (1) that person has bee given the written notice on a previous driving trip
past the control point and then again passes the control point in that same time interval and
(2) the beginning and eM of the potion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly
identified by signs that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision
and the local ordinance or resolution on cruising.
Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire
lane, as described in Section 22500.1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this
subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and
storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650).
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIFORM STANDARDS
21100.1 Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits
the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on
or afXer January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the
Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400.
REGULATION OF HIGHWAYS
21101. Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and
regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters:
a. Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having
jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic.
Designating any highway as a through highway and requiring that all vehicles observe official
traffic control devices before entering or crossing all highway or designating any intersection
as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the
intersection.
Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided
by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of
Chapter 5 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code No. ordinance which is adopted
pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to any state highway which
is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance
which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote.
d. Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conducting
automobile driver training programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state.
Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and
other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are the use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing.
Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic
barriers, or other roadway design features to implement the circulation element of a general
plans adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of
Division I of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this
subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local government to provide for the
health and safety of its citizens.
LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY CLOSE HIGHWAY: CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
21101.4 (a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for
temporarily closing to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions
are, after a public hearing, found to exist.
The local authority finds and determined that there is serious and continual criminal activity
in the portion of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This finding and
determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case
of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriff's
department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
2. The highway has not been designated as a through highway or arterial street.
3. Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity.
The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emergency vehicles, the
performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of freight by commercial
vehicles in the area of the highway proposed to be temporarily closed.
Co) A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18
months, except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one
additional period of not more than 18 months.
ITEM NO. 5
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE: September 22, 1994
SUBJECT: Item 5
Establish Specific Dates for the November and December, 1994 Public/Traffic
Safety Commission Meetings
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission establish specific meeting dates for the months of November
and December, 1994 to avoid holiday conflicts.
BACKGROUND:
The Commission requested staff to recommend an altered meeting schedule to avoid holiday conflicts.
During the last holiday season, the Commission decided to consolidate the November and December,
1993 meetings into one. Staff recommends to combine the two (2) meetings into one (1), to be scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ITEM NO. 6
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
(for September 22, 1994)
City Council Actions:
August 23, 1994
a. Approved County Cooperative Agrecments for State Route 79 Traffic Signal Projects.
September 13, 1994
a. Approved "No Parking" zone on Diaz Road from Rancho California Road to 160' north of Avertida Alvarada
Caltrans Coordination:
a. State Route 79(S) at La Paz and Bexlford Court intersection controls
City Traffic Project Status:
a. Traffic Signal - Nieolas/Winchester - Awarded contract September 13, 1994, 90 working days for
constraction.
b. Dual Southbound Lefts - Rancho California Road/Front - Pre-Constmction meeting September 13, 1994, 20
working days for constraction.
c. Vehicle Pre-emption system - reviewing bids - 30 working days for construction.
d. Traffic Signal - Margarita/SR 79(S) - Drafting contract for signal followed by submittal to Caltrans.
e. Traffic Signal - Avenida Barca/Margarita Road - Project specification in the City for final revision.
Upcomin~ Meetin~ Dates
Executive Committee Meeting - October 5, 1994 at 8:00 a.m.
Commissioner's Goals and Objectives Workshop - October 13, 1994 at 7:00 p.m.
Traffic Commissioners Workshop - October 15, 1994 at Cal Poly, Pomona
Safe Route to School Committee - November 9, 1994 at 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.
r:\traffic\engrpt.sspt/ajp
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Tim D. Setlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
E~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
September 1, 1994
Monthly Activity Report - August 1994
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of August 1994:
II.
III.
IV.
VI.
VII.
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 613 new and repainted legends
B. 0 L.F. of red curb new and repainted
C. 16,000 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
50
13
0
101
63
2
113,965
23
2,546
r:~o~ds~c~i~l\94\08
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT o August 1994
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 23 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 23 service order requests for the month of July, 1994.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 47 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only}, and response to street emergencies.
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the followinq:
· 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping
The total cost for Orange County striping services was $0.00 compared to $0.00 for July, 1994.
PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the foliowine:
· 0 sites, 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $0.00 compared to $0,00 for
July, 1994.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of August, 1994 was
$38,397.00 compared to $2,936.00 for the month of July, 1994.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$34,447.00
$3,950.00
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
r:\road~actt~t\94\08
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - August 1994
Page No. 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5401
Date: August 1, 1994-August 15, 1994
Via Lobo Channel
15 hours of water truck to water landscaping
Total Cost $975.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 1, 1994
Ynez Rd. s/o Rancho Vista
I - 8 hour day mechanical weed abatement
Total Cost $250.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 5, 1994
Main St. Bridge
Installed new safety railing on Main St. Bridge
Total Cost $5,181.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5401
Date: August 5, 1994
Santiago Channel
Clear, Grub and Re-establish Flow Line
Total Cost $2,000.00
r:\roadt~ctrpfi94\08
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - August 1994
Page No. 4
NELSON PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 12, 1994
A) Furnish and placed 150 L.F. of 6" A.C. Berm for E.O.P. Protection.
B) Furnish and placed 744 S.F. of 1.5" overlay for sinking manhole.
Total A.C. 17 Tons
Total S.F. 894
Total Cost $1,518.00
ARBOR PRO TREE TRIMMING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 9 thru August 24, 1994
City Wide Tree Trimming
136 trees trimmed City wide
Total Cost $7,785.00
D.B.X. INC.
Account No. 5402
Date: August 20, 1994
Emergency Loop Replacement n/e corner of Rancho California Rd. & Margarita Rd.
10 @ $335.00 each
Total Cost $3,350.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5401
Date: August 15 thru August 31, 1994
Via Lobo Channel - 15 hours of water truck to water landscaping
Total Cost $975.00
r:~oads~acttpt\94\08
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- August 1994
Page No. 5
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 23, 1994
1 - 8 hour day Mechanical Weed AbaTement at Pauba Rd. w/o Margarita
Total Cost $250.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 10-thru August 16, 1994
Repair Storm Drains/Re-pave Margarita Rd./Rancho California Rd.
HRS. RATE
TOTAL LABOR 106.5 38.00
FOREMAN 28.5 58.00
BACKHOE 34 84.00
DUMPTRUCK 22 75.00
WATER TRUCK 5 56.00
RENTALS
AMOUNT
4047.00
1653.00
2856.00
1650.00
280.00
JACKHAMMER
3" PUMP
PAVING
CEMENT
13 YDS. 5 SACKS @ 49.00 YD
17 YDS. SLURRY @ 38.00 YD
2 DAYS L~
$150.00 PER
DAY
1 DAY ~
$75.00 PER
DAY
TOTAL S.F.
490 TOTAL
A.C. 34 TONS
TOTAL
AMOUNT
300.00
75.00
3769.00
637.00
646.00
$16113.00
r:~nds~¢~rptX94\08
08-01-94
08-08-94
08-09-94
08-10-94
08-10-94
08-10-94
08-11-94
08-12-94
08-16-94
08-18-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-25-94
08-25-94
08-26-94
08-26-94
08-29-94
. 08-29-94
;08-31-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - AUGUST, 1994
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
~ ~ ] r~ .~,,,.. ..... . ,:,,, ~,, ~,~..i~,~!~ ~REQUEIIT ,. :.' .: ....... '..,, .,.,."'.~:.., ?. ~ WORK .,.~;.~,.,.~.!~,'
....... .
. · ' ......:' '.~7 .a COMPLETED .....
.. ~.: ,,,. , :..: ';..' .:. '.' . .....:"' ..'. ~,~. .;:j ;'.;~=.::~...:". ;.7..., ,".:.,:. ,
30707 Calle Pina Colada
30016 Villa Alturas
43898 Gatewood Way
Rancho Calif. Road @ Front
31017 Camino Verde
31016 Camino del Este
31719 Corte Padrera
41760 Asteriod
30482 Spica Court
31168 Calle Aragon
39185 Rising Hill Drive
30764 Sky Terrace Drive
31168 Calle Aragon
31200 Santiago
Rancho Highlands
La Paz @ Rancho Meadows
44125 Northgate Avenue
Via Corsica
31411 De Portola Road
31169 Calle Aragon
29731 Marhill Circle
Rancho Calif. Road Eastbound
31224 Paus Drive
Silt in Channel T.C.S.D.
Request for tree trimming
Channel Clean-out
Spilled bricks
Tree trimming
Tree removal
Graffiti
Root prune
Root prune
Tree removal
Plugged catch basin
Plugged catch basin
Tree replacement
Street failure
Graffiti
Tree trimming
Pothole
Knocked down
Repaired A.C. Berm
Sprinkler broken
Root prune
Trash
S.N.S. Knocked down
08-01-94
08-08-94
08-09-94
08-10-94
08-11-94
08-11-94
08-11-94
08-12-94
08-16-94
08-18-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-25-94
08-26-94
08-26-94
08-26-94
08-29-94
08-29-94
09-01-94
TOTAL S.O.R'S 23
pwO3~-oade~wL~n~lld\94\OS.r~q 090994
DATE
08-02-94
08-02-94
08-02-94
08-05-94
08-09-94
08-09-94
08-09-94
08-11-94
08-11-94
08-18-94
08-18-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-26-94
08-31-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - AUGUST, 1994
LOCATION
Rancho Vista ~i) Mira Loma Drive
41525 Avenida de la Reina
Ynez Road ~ Edwards Marque
Elinda Road W/O Calle Halcon
Rancho Calif. Road W/O
Lyndie Lane
Rancho Calif. Road W/O Business
Park Drive
E.M.W.D. Easement Rancho Vista
Road
First Street and Pujol Street
Rancho Calif. Road ¢~
Calle Aragon
31010 Pescado
Rainbow Canyon Road @ City
Limit
Tierra Vista ~ Nacido
Via Del Campo @ Rancho Vista
Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma
Drive
Rancho Vista Sports Park
Pujol Street/Boys and Girls Club
Community Center (7 locations)
Rancho Highlands Lot
WORK COMPLETED
Removed 525 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 8 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 920 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 41 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 60 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed I S.F, of Graffiti
Removed 40 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 215 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 686 S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL
_OCATIONS 2~
TOTALS.F. 2,546
DATE
08-01-94
08-02-94
08-03-94
08-04-94
08-09-94
08-15-94
08-16-94
08-17-94
08-18-94
08-22-94
08-23-94
08-24-94
08-24-94
08-25-94
i08-25-94
!08-25-94
~08-29-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - SEPTEMBER, 1994
STREET STENCILING
LOCATION
Area #2
See Daily for locations.
Area #2
See Daily for locations,
Area #2
See Daily of locations.
Area #2
See Daily for locations
Area #2
See Daily for locations.
Area #1
See Daily for locations.
Area #1
See Daily for locations.
Area #1
See Daily for locations.
Area #1
See Daily for locations.
Area #1
See Daily for locations.
Area #2
See Daily for locations.
Area #2
See Daily for locations.
Area #1
See Daily for locations.
Area #2
See Daily for locations,
Area #3
See Daily for locations
Area #4
See Daily for locations
Area #2
See Daily for locations
WORK COMPLETED
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repaint/
Grind
Repaint/
Grind
Repaint/
Grind
Repaint/
Grind
Repaint/
Grind
Repaint/
Grind
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
169 Legends
29 Legends
39 Legends
44 L.F, of Red Curb.
36 Legends
15 Legends
24 Legendes
27 Legends
16 L.F. of Red Curb
34 Legends
35 Legends
54 Legends
6 Legends
22 Legends
13 Legends
28 Legends
4 Legends
PW03~ROADS/WKCMPLTD\94\08.STN 090894
.TENCrf.ING - AUGUST, 1994
08-30-94
08-31
Area #2
See Daily for locations
Area #2
See Daily for locations
Repainted
Repainted
10 Legends
8 Legends
NEW &
REPAINTED
LEGENDS
0 RED CURB
NEW &
REPAINTED
16,000 SAND
BLASTING/
GRINDING
PW03~ROADS/WKCMPLTD\94\08.STN 090894
DATE
08-01-94
08-01-94
08-02-94
08-03-94
08-03-94
08-08-94
08-09-94
!08-10-94
08-10-94
08-11-94
08-16-94
08-17-94
08-18-94
;08-18-94
08-18-94
08-26-94
08-26-94
08-26-94
08-31-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETE - AUGUST, 1994
SIGNS
LOCATION I
Rancho Calif. Road @ Margarita Installed
Pauba Road E/O Ynez Road Replaced
Margarita @ Solana Way Installed
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/O Margarita Replaced
Rainbow Canyon Road Installed
Pauba Rd. E/O Margarita Replaced
Pauba Road Btwn. Margarita & Replaced
Meadows
Jefferson N/O Winchester Installed
Hwy. 395 N/O Rainbow Valley Installed
Blvd.
Enterprise Circle S. @ Enterprise
Circle N.
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/B E/O Front
(Median Signs)
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/B E/O Front
(Median Signs)
Rancho Calif. Rd. W/B E/O Front
Street
Winchester E/B E/O Jefferson
Winchester E/B E/O Jefferson
Yukon N/O Rancho Calif. Road
Via Corsica @ Del Rey Road
Margarita @ N. General Kearney
Area 2 See: Daily's for locations
WORK COMPLETED
R-2 "45" R-18
3 R-26 Old
R-1
W~41 "EGG"
3 Truck Weight Signs
14 R-26 "Old"
2 R-26 I Type "N" 4 carsonites
I R-1 SR-4A
R-18-1
1 Truck Weight Sign
Installed
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Installed
1 SNS Replaced
R-1 Graffiti
Post 1 R-2 (40)
2 W-41
(2) R-IO Faded
R-7 (2) Faded
Type N "yellow"
(2) new
W-41 (2) Faded
W-41 Faded
R-18-1 Faded
Wooden Posts (2) Highway
Patrol Signs
R-2-1 Faded
W-41 Faded
R-18-1 Faded
3 R-1 Graffiti
W-53 "Knockdown"
W-31 & "N" Knockdown
4 R-2 "25"
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 50
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 1Q
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 13
PW03~.OADS/WKCMPLTD~94\08.S[GNS 090194
DATE
08-01-94
08-04-94
08-04-94
08-05-94
08-05-94
08-08-94
08-09-94
08-10-94
08-11-94
08-11-94
08-12-94
08-15-94
08-16-94
08-16-94
08-16-94
08-17-94
LOCATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - AUGUST, 1994
WEED ABATEMENT
WORK COMPLETED
Winchester @ Carl's Jr. Abated
Front Street between Abated
First and Del Rio Plaza
Pala Road between Abated
Loma Linda & Via
Gilberto
Santiago L~ Front Street Abated
Hwy. 79 off ramp to Abated
Santiago
Pauba Road E/O Abated
La Primavera
Rancho Calif. Rd. W/O Abated
Kaiser Parkway
Margarita ~ La Serena Abated
Way
"C" Street L~ Santiago Abated
Front Street between Abated
Rancho Calif. Rd. &
Moreno Road
Via Gilberto Abated
Ynez N/B S/O Rancho Abated
Calif. Road
Lyndie Lane
Front Street N/B Abated
between Rancho Calif.
Road & Del Rio
Front Street N/B Abated
between Del Rio @
Winchester Road
Diaz Road @ Abated
Winchester Road
Rancho Calif. Road E/B Abated
W/O Ynez Road
50
2,100
12,000
600
2,500
2,500
9,900
13,500
6,076
10,000
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F.of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S,F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
800 S.F. of Flowline Weeds
500 S.F. of Curbline Weeds
1,200
4,324
L.F. of Curbline Weeds
L.F. of Curblline Weeds
600 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
250 L.F. of Sidewalk Weeds
pwO3X~:~ds\wlrcmplt,l\94XOS.Weedi 090794
~qEED ABATEMENT - AUGUST, 1994
08-17-94
08-17-94
08-17-94
08-18-94
08-19-94
08-19-94
08-19-94
08-19-94
08-19-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-24-94
08-24-94
08-25-94
08-25-94
Del Rio Road between Abated
Las Haciendas & Front
Diaz Road between Abated
Rancho Calif. Rd, &
Winchester Road
Rancho Way Abated
Pala Road between Abated
Rainbow Canyon &
Via Edwardo
Sixth Street @ Felix Abated
Valdez
Pujol Street ~ Sixth Abated
Street
Pujol Street ~ the Abated
Community Center
Rancho Calif. Road Abated
First Street @ City Yard Abated
Del Rey Road S/O Abated
Kahwea
30732 Via Norte Abated
Via Notre N/O Ave. Abated
Centenario
Jedediah Smith E/O Abated
Cabrillo
Buena Suerte between Abated
Del Rey & Ave, del
Reposo
Buena Suerte W/O Ave. Abated
del Reposo
Calle Centenario Abated
Ave. del Reposo Abated
Torcida @ La Sombra Abated
Court
Buena Suerte ~ Abated
Ave. del Reposo
Centenario, Buena Abated
Suerte to Estrada
7,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
10,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
1,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
7,600 L.F. of Curbline Weeds
3,200
575
750
2,600
10,000
6,000
500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
300 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S,F. of R.O.W. Weeds
8.F of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
50 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
50
100
1,000
500
800
600
S.F. of R.O.W, Weeds
S.F. of B.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
L.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
-2' pwO3~oads~wk¢m~ltd~94\O8.Weeds 090794
08-25-94
08-26-94
08-30-94
Via Norte L~ Centenario Abated
N. General Kearney E/O Abated
Margarita
40650 Calle Torcida Abated
200
1,500
1,150
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O,W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
113,965
TOTAL S.F. OF R.O.W.
WEED ABATEMENT
-3- pwO3~roEds\wkempltd\94\OS.Weede 090794
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - AUGUST, 1994
TREE TRIMMING
08-01-94
08-01-94
08-01-94
08-09-94
08-11-94
08-15-94
08-17-94
08-19-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-22-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-23-94
08-24-94
08-24-94
08-24-94
08-24-94
08-25-94
08-25-94
08-25-94
08-25-94
08-26-94
08-29-94
08-30-94
08-31-94
Ynez Road W/O Calle Halcon
Ynez Road S/O Pauba Road
Elinda Road S/O Pauba
Pauba Road @ Green Tree Road
Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma Drive
Ave. Barca N/O Margarita Road
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/B W/O Ynez Road
Pujol Street @ Commerce Center
31039 Del Rey Road
31 lOOVia None
30732 Via None
30711 Via None
La Paz S/O Hwy, 79 South
Jedediah Smith @ Cabrillo
Via None E/O Calle Fiesta
30845 Ave. del Reposo
Ave. del Reposo
Ave, del Reposo
oso btwn Buena Suerte to Del Rey Road
Via Aguila
Ave. Del Reposo
Buena Suerte @ Ave. del Reposo
Estrada SIS @ Cul-de-sac
Estrada @ Centenario
Rancho Calif. Road @ Ynez Road
28800 Pujol Street
40650 Calle Torcida
42244 Cosmic
Trimmed 1 tree
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 11 trees
Trimmed I tree
Removed 2 trees
Downed limb
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
8 trees for sight distance
10 trees for SW overhang
I tree OH RW
I tree OH RW
2 trees OH RW
I tree OH RW
5 trees OH RW
I tree OH RW
I tree OH RW
15 trees OH RW
12 trees OH RW
2 trees OH RW
Removed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Blow down 1
5 trees
3 trees R-1 Sight Distance
4 trees
6 trees
2 trees
1 tree
1 tree
I tree
-1- pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\O8.tre 090194
'gEE TRIMMING - AUGUST, 1994 (Continued)
TOTAL TREES TRIMMED 101
ITEM NO. 7
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
ITEM NO. 8
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
September 9, 1994
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
To :
Temecula City Council
Temecula Public Traffic / Safety Commission
Attn. :
Ronald Bradley
Temecula City Manager
Re. :
TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES
August 1994 Activity Report
The following reflects the monthly fire suppression and fire prevention activity of your fire
department for the month of August, 1994.
August was a peaceful month in our area. No major fires occurred. All permanent paid fire
personnel in the fire stations were evaluated during the CDF's mandated annual Basic Fire
Protection Skilt~ Certification Process testing. The purpose of this evaluation is to insure that
the public receives the best possible service by insuring that all personnel are performing to an
acceptable level of skill and knowledge. Training is continually ongoing in the fire department,
but this annual evaluation assesses the success of our training programs. All personnel performed
well.
The Temecula Fire personnel are looking ahead now to the end of fire season which
traditionally can be the worst part of the year as far as large, destructive fires. As you well
know, October is a very active special events month in Temecula. The Tractor Races, Rodeo,
Pumpkin Run, etc. brings an influx of people and sometimes an influx of emergencies. We are
preparing for both.
Thank you for your constant support of the department. Our goal is to be as responsive,
efficient, and service oriented to our citizens as is humanly possible. Please call John Winder
or myself if you have any questions.
J. M.Harris, Chief
Riverside County Fire
By: Mark Bredowski
Battalion Chief
Temecula Battalion
~PnnTed on Recycled Paper
TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY INCIDENT STATISTICS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION
Month August Year 1994
FIRE CONTROL ACTIVITIES
Structure Fires
Vehicle Fires
Vegetation Fires
Other Fires
Medical Aids
Traffic Collisions
False Alarms
Fire Menace Standby
PSA's
Assists and Covers
TOTALS:
STATION #12 STATION #73 TOTAL
4 3 7
2 3 5
19 4 23
5 0 5
85 40 125
15 11 26
17 16 33
5 3 8
6 4 10
21 32 53
179 116 295
STATION FIRE PREVENTION
Community Activities
School Programs
Fairs and Displays
Company Inspections
LE-38 Inspections
Fire Investigation
Burning Permits Issued
TOTAL8:
STATION
STATION #73 TOTAL
1 0 1
1 0 1
0 0 0
75 124 199
38 38
0 0 0
0 1 1
115 125 240
TOTAL HOURS
B15-1 (6/92)
B ?fi' ~k%~.~te~%j Date: 9/9/94
Y
Hark Brodowski, BC
C)
ITEM NO. 9
COMMISSION REPORTS