Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout052396 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you neccl special assistance to participate in skis meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a raecag will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL, MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California Thursday, May 23, 1996 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Perry, Sander, Guerriero, Johnson, Coe PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matmrs listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of March 28, 1996 and Al~ril 25, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of March 28, 1996 (Continued from ~he meeting of April 25, 1996) 1.2 Approve the Minutes of April 25, 1996 (Continued to the meeting of June 27, 1996) 2. Speed 1 .imit - Rancho California Road from Moraga Road to Margarita Road and Diaz Road to West RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution updating the speed limits on Rancho California Road from Moraga Road to Margarita Road and Diaz Road to west City Limits. COMMISSION BUSINESS 3. Speed Limit - Pqjol Street from Sixth Street to its Southerly Terminus RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a speed limit on Pujol Street from Sixth Street to its southerly terminus. 4. Raneho Highland~ Subdivision "Stop" Sign Installation and Traffic Control RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend timt the City Council adopt a resolution establishing "Stop" controls within Raneho Highlands subdivision. 5. Traffic Engineer's Report 6. Police Chief's Report 7. Fire Chief's Report 8. Commission Report AD.IOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, June 27, 1996, at 7:00 P.M., Temeeula City Hall, Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ITEM NO. I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION MARCH 28, 1996 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Commission was called to order on Thursday, March 28, 1996, 7:00 P.M., at the City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Ternecula, California. Chairman Coe called the meeting to order. PRESENT: 3 ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Coe, Perry COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Sander Also present were Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber, Police Sergeant Ron Crisp and Fire Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski. Chairman Coe called for non-agenda items at 7:05 P.M. Ed Dool, Sixth Street and Front Street, Transit Center, requested consideration of Commission approval for installation of a 4-way stop at Sixth Street and Front Street in Old Town. He stated this would facilitate left turns for the shuttle buses. He updated the Commission on the construction for the bus depot, which should begin construction late May, 1996. Commissioner Coe requested staff look into the request for a 4-way stop. Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that the City was currently researching this location to determine if a 4-way stop sign is warranted. Commissioner Perry requested that Front and Main Streets be researched for stop sign consideration. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes of January 25.1996 and February 22.1996 It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to continue Item 1.1 the Minutes of January 25, 1996, to April 25, 1996 and to approve Item 1.2 the Minutes of February 22, 1996. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Coe, Perry COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS: Sander, Guerriero MINUTES:03/28/96 1 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MARCH 28.1996 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Soeed Limit on Margarita Road from Solana Way to Rancho California Road Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report. He explained that this location does not meet the 85 percentlie criteria for changing the speed limit. He also stated that a left comfort lane is needed in front of the apartments in order to facilitate vehicles turning into oncoming traffic. Staff recommended the reaffirmation of 45 MPH. Chairman Coe called for public comments at 7:30 P.M. Philip de Schauwer, 29549 Corg Way, expressed concern about speeding vehicles traveling from Margarita Hot Springs Road to Moraga Road on Margarita Road. He also discussed the location where Margarita Road narrows in front of the Villa condominiums where it is impossible to make a left turn out of the homes into the traffic. He recommended the speed limit be limited to 35 MPH on Margarita Road between Solana Way and Moraga Road. Commissioner Coe responded that it would be difficult to drop the speed limit. Lieutenant Domonoe responded that this area is not considered residential and therefore does not qualify for the 35 MPH limit. Traffic Engineer Lauber explained that the City is considering two (2) projects which would assist in easing traffic for residents: a joint use parking site with the elementary school on Moraga Road; and a park site where the road narrows between Solana Way and Winchester Road. Commissioner Perry requested information, about these projects be reported in the Traffic Engineer's Report, or as an agenda item next month if the timeline on these projects is scheduled for more than one year. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Perry to recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution re-affirming the speed limit of 45 MPH on Margarita Road from Solana Way to Rancho California Road. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Coe, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Sander, Guerriero MINUTES:03/28/96 2 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MARCH 28.1996 "All-Way" Stop - Margarita Road at Stonewood Road Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report and stated that warrants had been met for signalization. This intersection has been added to the priority list for installation of a traffic signal, therefore staff requests denial of the request for the "All- Way" stop. It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to deny the request for an "All-Way" stop at Margarita Road at Stonewood Road. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Coe, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Sander, Guerriero 4. "No Stoppine" - Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road Traffic Engineer Lauber presented the staff report with an amendment to the posted time which is recommended to be from 6:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. it was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve a "No Stopping" zone to replace the existing "No Parking" zone on Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Coe, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Sander, Guerriero TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber reported on the following: · Due to construction on Winchester Road, there is a need to divert traffic onto Rancho California Road. Signal cycles will be modified from Ynez Road to Diaz Road. The cycle schedule will be reviewed periodically to determine if it is working properly. · Staff is working with the Starlight Ridge residents on an extensive report, which will be presented to the City Council at their April 23, 1996 meeting. MI~IUTES:03/28/96 3 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MARCH 28.1996 The traffic counters have been down and giving incorrect information. They are back on-line and staff will be able to present more information at the next meeting. Commissioner Coe asked if the Starlight Ridge residents were pleased with the progress in their area. Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that he did not know if they were and that Mr. Bruckman had met with the Mayor to discuss installation of one-way streets or a cul-de-sac on Cosmic Drive. Staff is keeping a close look at the area and conducting an extensive study and will be relocating the radar trailer to a better position. Commissioner Johnson asked the status of the installation of flashers adjacent to school zones which had been recommended for approval by the Commission. Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that this project is being funded by the City from the FY96/97 budget. He also stated that one additional flasher is being added at the Paloma Del Sol Elementary School. POLICE REPORT Police Sergeant Ron Crisp reported on the following: Temecula officers spent 28 hours during the month of February, 1996 in the Starlight Ridge area. Ten (10) citations were issued, five (5) on Cosmic Drive and five (5) on Rancho California Road, which were mostly residents of Starlight Ridge. He is working with Traffic Engineer Lauber on researching the Starlight Ridge resident's concerns. · A SCAIR Operation is scheduled for Saturday. · Citations are up 100 from last year at this same time. There is a change of the Officer in Charge of the Radar Trailer as of April 11, 1996, which will allow it to be utilized 12-14 hours per day. Commissioner Perry commended the Police Department for their extensive visibility on the streets of Temecula. Commissioner Johnson concurred with Commissioner Perry and thanked the officers for the good work they do. FIRE CHIEFS REPORT Due to a call to Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski, no report was given. MINUTES:03/28/96 4 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MARCH 28. 1996 COMMISSION REPORT Commissioner Johnson asked how the newly installed right turn on South Winchester Road was working. Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that the delineators to the south had not been keeping people out of the turn and it will be extended to correct this. Commissioner Perry expressed concern that the right turn only sign into Palm Plaza is not visible to oncoming drivers. Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that the delineators would be extended and the sign would be moved to a more visible location. He also asked the status of the study of Front and Main Streets, and Sixth and Front Streets in the Old Town circulation pattern. Traffic Engineer Lauber will provide a copy of the Old Town Specific Plan to the Commission. Commissioner Johnson stated that he would like staff to explore the possibility of an "All-Way" Stop at Sixth Street and Front Street. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Perry to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, April 25, 1996, at 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Charles Coe Secretary MINUTES:03/28/96 5 ITEM NO. 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer May 23, 1996 Item 2 Speed Limit on Rancho California Road from Moraga Road to Margarita Road and Diaz Road to West City Limits Prepared By: All Moghadam, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council, adopt a resolution updating the speed limit on Raneho California Road from Moraga Road to Margarita Road and Diaz Road to west City Limits. BACKGROUND: In order to enforce posted speed limits, a traffic and engineering survey must be cenducted within a five (5) year period per Section 40803° of the California Vehicle Cede (CVC). In order to comply with the requirements of the CVC, the traffic and engineering surveys must be periodically updated. The Traffic Division has conducted Traffic and Engineering Surveys to update the existing 50 MPH speed limit on Rancho California Road from Moraga Road to Margarita Road and Diaz Road to west City Limits. Posted speed limits are primarily based on an analysis of prevailing speeds (851h percentlie), as measured in the field, accident history and roadway conditions. Section 627 of the CVC defines Engineering and Traffic Survey as follows: Engineering and Traffic Survey 627.(a) "Engineering and traffic survey", as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities. (b)An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of aH of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. 1. The following table is a summary of the April, 1996 speed survey and prevailing speeds, ROADWAY SEGMENT 85TH PERCENTILE 1991 [ 1996 POSTED RECOMMENDED SPEED SPEED LIMIT Rancho California Road betwoen Moraga Road and Cosmic Drive 54 50 50 Rancho California Road between Cosmic Drive and Margarita Road 50 52 50 50 Rancho California Road botwoon Diaz Road and west City Limits 52 54 50 50 In 1995, 13 accidents were reported on Rancho California Road between Moraga Road and Margarita Road. The majority of these accidents occurred at the intersections and were due to right- of-way violation. Traffic or roadside conditions that are not readily apparent to drivers were not considered to be a factor in this speed zoning. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attaclunents: Exhibit "A" Location Maps 1 BITT P~SEO DR EXItIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP ITEM NO. 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer May 23, 1996 Item 3 Speed Limit on Pujol Street between Sixth Street and its Southerly Terminus Prepared By: All Moghadam, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the PublicrFmffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council, adopt a resolution establishing a speed limit on Pujol SWeet between Sixth Street and its southerly terminus. BACKGROUND: In order to enforce posted speed limits, a traffic and engineering survey must be conducted within a five (5) year period per Section 40803° of the California Vehicle Code (CVC). In order to comply with am requirements of the CVC, the traffic and engineering surveys must be periodically updated. The Traffic Division has conducted Traffic and Engineering Surveys to update the existing 35 MPH speed limit on Pujol Street south of Sixth Street. The 35 MPH speed limit was established prior to the City's incorporation in 1989 and no longer is enforceable. Posted speed limits are primarily based on an analysis of prevailing speeds (851h percentile), as measured in the field, accident history and roadway conditions. Section 627 of the CVC defines Engineering and Traffic Survey as follows: Engineering and Traffic Survey 627.(a)"Engineering and traffic survey", as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities. Co)An en~neering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, eousideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. I. The following table is a summary of the May, 1996 speed survey and prevailing speeds. ROADWAY SEGMENT Pujol Stroot between Sixth Street and First Street Pujol Street between First Street and its southerly terminus 85'rH PERCENTILE POSTED RECOMMENDED SPEED SPEED LIMIT 1991 1996 34 35 30 36 NotPosted 30 2. Our records indicate one (1) accident on Pujol Street within a twelve (12) month period. Traffic or roadside conditions that are not readily apparent to drivers were not observed; however, in order to maintain continuous speed limit on Pujol Street, a reduction of more that five (5) MPH from the 851h percentile speed is recommended on the segment between First SWeet and southerly terminus. FISCAL IMPACT: 6 new signs & pests @ $150 ca. = $ 900 6 new pavement legends @ $25 ea. = $ 150 TOTAL $1,050 Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Maps iONDA EXHIBIT "A" LOCATI ITEM NO. 4 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer May 23, 1996 Item 4 Rancho Highlands Subdivision "Stop" Sign Installation and Traffic Control Prepared By: Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing "Stop" controls within Raneho Highlands subdivision. BACKGROUND: This item was reviewed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on February 22, 1996 and was continued to allow staff to collect additional data and to investigate other intersections within the Raneho Highlands subdivision. On February 22, 1996 the City received a correspondence from the new Home Owners Association (HOA) regarding the speeding on Preece Lane as well as the status of the previous request for "Stop" sign installation. Staff has completed the investigation for the requested "Stop" signs and speed control, and the following is a brief summary of this investigation. Since our initial investigation, additional "Stop" signs have been installed by the developer per previously approved plans (Exhibit "A"). Currently, only the westerly half of Preece Lane which is within Tract No. 21760 (Rancho Highlands subdivision) has been accepted into the City Maintained Street System. Since the sireels within the boundary of Tract No. 21760 have been accepted into the City Maintained Street System, installation of additional traffic control devices will be the City's responsibility. To avoid confusion and to complete the installation of "Stop" signs within this subdivision, assignment of right- of-way should be considered at the following intersections: Buckeye Road at Preece Lane (existing "Stop" sign on Tierra Vista Road at Preece Lane) Via Fanita at Calle Nacido Corte Rialto at Via Fanita There has been one (1) reported accident at the intersection of Via Fanita and Calle Nacido on August 11, 1995, and one (1) accident at the intersection of Tierra Vista Road and Calle Nacido on February 29, 1996. No other accidents have been reported in this subdivision during the twelve month period studied. The above intersections meet the Caltrans Warrant No. 5 for "Stop" sign installation. Caltrans Warrant No. 5, "on a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per hour". Staff has also conducted a speed study on Preece Lane between Via Fanin and Via Mondo, the results are as follows: Median Speed 30 MPH Average Speed 30 MPH 851h percenfile speed is 34 MPH 10 MPIt pace speed 26 to 35 MPH Percent of vehicles in pace 69 - 48 % Total vehicles in 24 hours 307 Preece Lane is a 44 foot wide street with no driveway access, therefore, the residential prim facie speed limit of 25 MPH does not apply. One of the California Vehicle Cede (CVC) requirements for residential district is that the street width must be 40 feet or less. Upon acceptance of the easterly half of the Preece Lane into the City Maintained Street System, an engineering and traffic survey will be conducted on this street to determine the appropriate speed limit. The established speed limit will then be posted and enforced. FISCAL IMPACT: 4 "Stop" signs and posts @ $150 ca. = $600 4 Limit lines and pavement legends @ $50 ca. = 200 TOTAL Attachments: 1. Letter of Request 2. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 3. Exhibit "B" - Caltraus Warrants H(HO IOHLAHI (OHPIUttl]T AgO(IATIOH 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 262 Temecula, CA 9259 I (909) 69%29 ~ 8 Fax: (909) 69%0522 February 20, 1996 Martin C. Lauber, P.E. Traf~c Engineer City of Temecula Public Works 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RECEIVED FEB g g 1996 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUEST Dear Mr. Lauber: Our Association previously corresponded with you last September 13, 1995 regarding traffic controls w~thin ourcommunity, You subsequently responded on September 27, 1995 stating that file would be opened and the appropriate studies conducted. Please note that the original correspondence came from Anthony Andreo~a of Elite Commun/ty Management. Disregard this information, as we have opened our own management office and are no longer with Elite. Accordingly, we are formally requesting the status of the field investigations. In addition, we would like to add a street to our reques~ for traffic controls. The area in question is Preece Lane that seems to be "ace track" to many residents and nonresidents looking to cut through the lights along Ynez (between Rancho V~sta and Santiago Roads). Several homeowners have voiced a concern overthis street and seeming lack of speed control by the City, Prease advise me of the status and if we can help you in any way to expedite the process. You may reach me between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday - Thursday. I look forward to hearing from you. Manager SK cc: Board of Directors EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP EXISTING STOP SIGN PROPOSED STOP SIGN '°ject ,S ® ,qoUTS 1.5 ~ TRACT NO. 21760 Traffic Manual SIGNS 4-37 EXHIBIT R1 Standard30' R1~3 Standard 12" x 6' R1-4 Standan:t 18" x 6" lfBIf POLICY Stop Signs and Yield Signs · Stop Signs The STOP sign (R1) shall be used where traffic is required to stop except at signalized intersections. The STOP sign shall be an octagon with white mes- sage and I~order on a red background. The standard size shall be 30 x 30 inches. Where greater emphasis or visibility is required, a larger size is recommended. On local streets and secondary roads with low ap- proach speeds and low volume, a 24 x 24 inch size may be used. At a multiway stop intersection, a supplemental plate (R1-3 or R1-4) should be mounted just below each STOP sign. The numeral on the supplementary plate shall corres- pond to the number of approach legs, or the legend ALL-WAY (R1-4) may be used. The plate shall have white letters on a red background. A red flashing beacon or beacons may be used in conjunction with a STOP sign. See Section 9-08 (Flashng Beacons). Secondary messages shall not be used on STOP sign faces. Warrants for STOP Signs Because the STOP sign causes a substantial incon- venience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an inter- section where one or more of the following con- ditions exist: 1. On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to correction by STOP signs. 2. On a county road or city street 'at its intersection with a state highway. 3. At the intersection of two main highways. The highway traffic to be stopped depends on ap- proach speeds, volumes, and turn!ng movements. 4, On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. 5. On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per hour, 6. At an unsignalized intersection in a signal- ized area. 7. At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indi- cates a need for control by the STOP sign. ITEM NO. 5 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Z~/~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent May 1, 1996 Monthly Activity Report - April, 1996 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel fer the month of April, 1996: I. SIGNS a. B. C. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Total signs replaced 37 Total signs installed 27 Total signs repaired 0 TREES A, Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 1 POTHOLES A, Total square feet of potholes repaired 205 CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A, Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 45,965 GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 57 B. Total S.F. 5,867 STENCILING A. 346 new and repainted legends B. 32,002 L.F. of red curb new and repainted C, 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding r:\roads\actrpt\96\04 je MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1996 Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 21 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 28 service order requests for the month of March, 1996. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 75 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. I.P.S. STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has coml;)leted the following: · 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 0 L.F. of sand blasting The total cost for i. P.S. striping services was $0.00 compared to 9929.03 for March, 1996. PESTMASTER SERVICES has coml~leted the following: · 64,389 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost 92,575.55 compared to $11,420.00 for March, 1996. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 1996 was 95,734.55 compared to $60,673.58 for the month of March, 1996. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 2,223.00 936.00 0.00 CC: Steve Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer r:\roads\actrpt~96\04 je STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March. ACCOUNT NO. 5401 · L, :WILIjIAMS. LANDSCAPEE INC. DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE 04/26/96 Via Lobo Channel DESCRIPTION OF WORK Weed and Replant Landscape area around Channel. Total Acct. No. 5401 TOTAL COST $936.00 $936.00 ACCOUNT NO. 5402 ... L'WILLiAMS' 'LANDSCAPEINC.. DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE 04/08/96 Starlight Ridge JKZ CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE 04/08/96 Rainbow Canyon Road DESCRIPTION OF WORK Ramoval and stump grinding of 4 dead R.O.W. trees. DESCRIPTION OF WORK Emergency Guard Rail Repair Total Acct. No. 5402 TOTAL COST $850.00 TOTAL COST $1,373.00 $2,223.00 r:\roads\actrpt%96\O4 je ao')n h, N .o ~,~ z ';~ UJ o,0 ~ turn LU 0 Z U,I al-- I-- Z ,0 '~ KI U) ~ u, ~ ILl rn n, mrv' Z a o Z I--n' z v --~ uJ ZUJ Z _J -r' IJJOQ~O w .r 0 O~w o ~ ~: z~: 3:~-d a W I-- LU ,_1 0 0 LU ~ ITEM NO. 6 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 [909) 694-1989 · FAX [909) 694-I999 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: City Council Publicf traffic Safety Commission Ronald Bradley, City Manager Pete Labaim Police Department May14,1996 POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR APRIL, 1996 The following report reflects Part One Crimes, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during April of 1996. Part One Crime statistics are broken down by individual districts within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department issued 380 citations last month, which compares with 397 issued in April of 1995. The number of traffic collisions decreased slightly over that reported last year. Temecula experienced one fatal traffe collision last month. Arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol increased by three over April of 1995. Reported burglaries increased from last year, while reported grand thefts, felony assaults and auto theft decreased. None of these changes are viewed as statistically significant. Total arrests made during the month increased slightly over 1995. The Police Department responded to thirty-six "priority one" calls for service during the month of April, with an average response time of slightly over seven minutes. A total of 2,026 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temeeula during the month. The Police Department's Special Enforcement Team made thirty-seven arrests for narcotics related offenses last month, and wrote and served five search warrants. The Team seized mcthamphetamine, heroin and marijuana with an estimated street value exceeding 150,000 dollars. II~Prlrlted on Recyc, led Paper POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTMTY MAY 14, 1996 The Police Department's two School Resource Officers were "off track" during the month, and therefore temporarily assigned to the patrol function. Both officers attended a School District sponsored Leadership Training Seminar focusing on issues of prejudice and diversity, The seminar, facilitated by Dr. Minta Brown of the State Office of Education, was enjoyed by both officers. The Police Department's two crime prevention officers conducted fifty-one business checks last month. One article concerning protecting children from crime and violence was completed and will appear in the May edition of the Valley Business Journal. Two neighborhood watch meetings were held. One cdme prevenfion officerjoined lnvestigator John Cook, School Resource officer Rudy Navarro and Pete Labahn at a community forum on sex crimes at Nicholas Valley Elementary School on April 8, 1996. On Saturday, April 13, 1996, Crime Prevention Officers and other Police Department personnel conducted a "sting" operation in response to complaints concerning sales of alcohol to Temecula area youth by a number of establishments. Thirteen businesses were targeted for enforcement. Eight of the thirteen businesses demonstrated proper practices when approached by our operative, and were commended on the spot for their compliance with State law and their demonstrated commitmere to the public safety. Five businesses received citations for violations. The Police Department was heavily involved in delivery of security services for this year' s Balloon and W'me Festival, and will participate in after action planning to ensure that next year's event is also a SUCCESS. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral pan of the Temecula Police Departmant's staff.. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Ed Bekas, the Police Depanmant's volunteer staff contributed 389 hours of service in April. Temecula Police Department Monthly Statistics April 1996 May 96 T ble of Contents Statistical Information Map of Districts ..................................... Page 01 April 1996 Number Totals ............................. Page 02 April 1996 Number Totals ............................. Page 03 Graphs Part i Property crimes ............... Part i Persons Crimes ................ Activity Breakdown by District ....... Burglaries by District ............... Burglary comparison .................. Arrest Statistics .................... Miscellaneous Activity ............... Traffic Violations ................... Traffic Collisions ................... Narcotic Activity .................... .............. Page 04 .............. Page 05 .............. Page 06 .............. Page 07 .............. Page 08 .............. Page 09 .............. Page 10 .............. Page 11 .............. Page 12 .............. Page 13 City of Temecula Reporting Districts ZIP CODE TEMECULA CRIME HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY FELONY ASSAULT TOTAL PERSONS BURGLARY GRAND THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON TOTAL PROPERTY GRAND TOTAL HAZARD CITES NON-HAZARD CITES PARKING CITES TOTAL CITES DIST. PEACE SHOPLIFT PETTY THEFT VANDALISM MISD. ASSAULT ALARMS PUBLIC INTOX. DUI TOTAL TIC INJURY TIC NON-INJURY FATAL TIC TOTAL TIC RESID. BURGLARY COMM. BURGLARY OTHER BURGLARY VEHICLE BURGLARY Crime Statistics Temecula ""' A 0 0 0 0 I ol 2 2 0 0 I 41 4 15 10 86 J 111J B C D E F G H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 ol ol 31 0 2 0 4 5 0 2 2 2 1 0 8 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 sl 4J 7J sl 91 3 5 4 8 8 10 10 20 9 24 20 8 1 3 0 15 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~1 231 91 391 401 141 9 12 19 6 9 8 13 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 9 0 1 I 3 6 2 4 0 2 1 0 6 8 1 0 3 0 1 2 2 15 3 13 38 59 43 4 0 1 0 0 5 1 5 1 3 6 0 6 6 0 I SUB-TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 01 0| 6 1 0 14 1 2 20 0 0 6 0 0 0 2~ 2J 40 2 2 46 3 4 113 5 2 62 0 0 86 8~ 61 261 14 3 93 5 0 12 2 0 24 4 0 25 1 1 11 12 0 187 0 0 12 3 0 25 I 1 1 1 i i 0 1 0 1 2 I 3J 4°1 2l ~1 ~5J 211 ~J 2l ~1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 5 I 2 0 389 5 45 0 50 4 9 1 13 FELONY ARRESTS 25 TOTAL ARRESTS I 91 9l 71 81 ~31 331 ~41 61 01 99 TOTAL ACTIVITY I 157l 37l 741 sol 145l 147l 60l 53l 13l 746 Page 2 CRIME HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY FELONY ASSAULT TOTAL PERSONS BURGLARY GRAND THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON TOTAL PROPERTY GRAND TOTAL HAZARD CITES NON-HAZARD CITES PARKING CITES TOTAL CITES DIST. PEACE SHOPLIFT PETTY THEFT VANDALISM MISD. ASSAULT ALARMS PUBLIC INTOX. DUI TOTAL T/C INJURY TIC NON-INJURY FATAL TIC TOTAL TIC RESID. BURGLARY COMM, BURGLARY OTHER BURGLARY VEHICLE BURGLARY MISD. ARRESTS FELONY ARRESTS TOTAL ARRESTS TOTAL ACTIVITY Temecula Crime Statistics · ~=': Month J K L M 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 I 31 11 ol 3 4 2 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 5l 81 41 8 9 4 26 9 4 13 9 0 6 2 3 I 4~1 201 71 16 21 12 0 0 1 8 11 2 7 5 0 3 2 1 42 8 28 10 2 1 3 4 1 I ei I I 7l 3l 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Of April 1996 N O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 2 I I OI sl 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI 4} OI I 5 0 4 3 3 0 6 4 0 2 0 3 6 3 9 101 91 5l 151 3 6 0 13 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 8 12 0 18 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 161 191 OI 391 31 11 OI 21 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q SUB-TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 6 OI 9| 0 6 1 5 0 0 21 241 2 33 0 51 0 28 8 40 4 75 0 3 1 24 0 8 9 125 0 17 0 9 151 277| 2 O| 22| 1 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 291 141 11 61 31 ol 91 21 I 1491 eel 601 301 341 51 601 251 4511 TOTAL 0 2 5 8 15 27 26 11 0 64 79 164 90 126 380 168 15 48 41 19 312 29 34 666 5 67 0 72 15 11 1 17 125 38 163 1197 Page 3 0 ~1 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ , - .... O~ / C) Z E ¢) 0 LO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITEM NO. 7 FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 May ~1~ 1996 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694 1999 To : Temecula City Council Temecula Public Traffic / Safety Commission Attn. : Ronald Bradley Temecula City Manager Re. : TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES April 1995 Activity Report The following reflects the monthly fire suppression and fire prevention activity of your fire department for the month of April, 1995. Approximately 2,200 people were contacted this month through our ongoing fire prevention and education activities within the City. Some of these activities were for pre-schools, cub scouts, station tours, the annual health fair at the Target parking lot, and also some fire extinguisher classes for employees of the municipal court, Brentwood Montessori school, and Rancho California Medical. Responses to vegetation fires throughout the county are on the increase, and soon we will be experiencing fires within and adjacent to the City of Temecula. Fire season will open officially on Monday, May 6, 1996 for all areas protected by CDF (Ca. Dept. Of Forestry and Fire Protection). The second annual Temecula Public Safety Expo has been postponed back to November, 1996 due to many activities in the City and the very active fire occurrences so early in the season this year. There is concern that many of the fire resources would not be able to attend due to being needed for suppression and support of fire incidents. Thank you for your continued support for your fire service personnel. There are so many activities and challenges within our community and it is a pleasure working with you all to meet these challenges. J. M.Harris, Chief Riverside County Fire By: Mark Brodowski Battalion Chief Temecula Battalion TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES MONTHLY ACTIVITY STATISTICS Month April Year 1996 EMERGENCY ACTIVITY Structure Fires Vehicle Fires Vegetation Fires Other Fires Medical Aids Traffic Collisions False Alarms Fire Menace Standbys Public Service Assists Assists and Covers Hazmats TOTALS: FIRE PREVENTION Community Activities School Programs Fairs and Displays Company Inspections LE-3 8 Dooryard Inspections Fire Investigations Burning Permits Issued TOTALS: FormBlS-I (5/95) STA. 12 STA. 73 0 3 4 2 6 1 5 0 79 54 11 1I 26 8 4 1 3 3 5 33 2 143 118 1 4 1 1 1 1 27 71 0 0 10 6 9 3 49 86 BY: STA. Brodowski STA. 84 1 1 1 4 54 6 8 0 8 24 1 108 TOTALS 4 7 8 9 187 28 42 5 14 62 3 369 5 2 2 98 0 16 17 140 DATE: 5/3/96 (]) > 0 0 i~09 LL Q) 0 c- G ° ITEM NO. 8 COMMISSION REPORTS