The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About052300 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MAY 23, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning acquiring an interest in real property located at 44501 La Paz Road. The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the Rancho Meadows Homeowners. Under negotiation is the affordability covenants. The Agency/City negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Meyer. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning acquiring an interest in real property located at 42081 Main Street (APN 922-036-028). The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Jack Davis. Under negotiation is the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The Agency/City negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Meyer. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of pending litigation involving the City. The following case/claim will be discussed: 1) K.R. Spayed. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8(c) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to such matters, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties I' may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. __..i At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. R:~Agenda\052300 1 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2000-04 Resolution: No. 2000-33 CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Jeff Stone Aaron Breid Pastor Lubeck of Church on the Rock Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS United Way Recoqnition to the City Make-a-Difference Day Proclamation Safe and Courteous Driving Awareness Month Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you am called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, then (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICETO THEPUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. R:~Agenda\052300 2 1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 3 4 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution Approvinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve an additional expenditure in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for Plan Check Services with Esgil Corporation; 3.2 Approve an additional expenditure in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for Plan Check Services with VanDorpe Chou and Associates. Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions necessary to Foreclose Delinauent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-t2 AS REQUIRED BY; ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL R:~Agenda\052300 3 6 7 8 Street Name ChanGe from Calle Patron to Roick Drive RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP NO. 28471-F FROM CALLE PATRON TO ROICK DRIVE SB 332 BeveraGe Container Recycling and Litter Abatement Funding ReGuest RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB 332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER ABATEMENT GRANT FOR FY 1999- 2000 Parcel Map No. 26845-1 - Findincl of Conformance with its original approval (located at the northeast corner of Santia~lo Road and Ynez Road) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 26845-1 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 7.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for the agreements, Tract Map No. 24187-1 - Finding of Conformance with its original approval (located south and west of Sunny Meadows Drive, east of Meadows Parkwav, and north of De Portola Road in the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Tract Map No. 24187-1 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 8.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 8.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. R:~genda\052300 4 9 Pala Road Bridqe - Project No. PW97-15 - California Hiqhwav Patrol Aqreement RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the CHP Agreement No. 0305-99/00 for an amount not to exceed $9,747.04 for providing Traffic Control Services during the Rainbow Canyon Road Closure/Detour and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 10 Completion and Acceptance for the I-15 Southbound Auxiliary Lane at Winchester Road - Proiect No. PW98-07 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept the project for the I-15 southbound auxiliary lane at Winchester Road - Project No. PW98-05 - as complete; 10.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 10.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 11 TEA-21 Grant Application - Pala Road Street and Drainaqe Improvements RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Receive and file the report regarding our Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) Grant Application for Pala Road Street and Drainage Improvements and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to Caltrans for submittal to the U.S. Department of Transportation; 11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALTRANS APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR PUBLIC LANDS/HIGHWAYS DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR PALA ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 12 Local A.clencv - State-Local Transportation Partnership Pro.clram Aclreement No. SLTPP- 5459 - Pro<~ram Supplement No, 003 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\052300 5 13 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 003 TO THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE STATE FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SB99-5459 (003) CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROAD AT OVERLAND DRIVE, YNEZ ROAD TO MARGARITA ROAD, AND MARGARITA ROAD, WINCHESTER ROAD TO SOLANA WAY 12.2 Approve the program supplement agreement between Caltrans and City of Temecula for funding Overland Drive (Ynez Road to Margarita Road) and Margarita Road (Winchester Road to Solana Way) in the amount of $529,258.00. Award of Construction Contract for Ynez Road/Marclarita Road Interim Improvements - Project No. PW00-06 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Award a construction contract for the Ynez Road/Margarita Road interim improvements - Project No. PW00-06 - to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. in the amount of $65,232.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,523.20, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:%Agenda\052300 6 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2000-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2000-09 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLLCALL: DIRECTORS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberrs, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 2000. 2 Award of Construction Contract for the Calle Araclon Park Drainage Structures - Project No. PW99-21CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award a contract for the Calle Aragon Park Drainage Structures - Project No. PW99-21CSD to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining Inc. for $75,000.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract; 2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,500.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. R:%Agenda\052300 7 3 Desjan Services Aqreement - Phase I for the Northwest Sports Complex Project RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Award, in substantial form, final form to be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney, a Design Services Agreement - Phase I of $89,368 with RJM Design Group for the preparation of the Master Plan for the Northwest Sports Complex; 3.2 Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,936 for the Design Services Agreement. 4 Ratification of Election Results - Woodside Chantemar Homes - Tract No. 28510 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON MAY 11, 2000 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW DISTRICT BUSINESS 5 Cultural Arts Master Plan Implementation RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file the update report from the Arts Council regarding the implementation of the Cultural Arts Master Plan. 6 Senior Center Expansion Project RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the conceptual design for the expansion of the Mary Phillips Senior Center; 6.2 Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the Senior Center Expansion Project. R:~Agenda\052300 8 7 Racinq at the Northwest Sports Complex RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve four (4) racing dates requested by the Temecula Town Association ('ERA) and hosted by the Southern California Flat Track Association for motorcycle racing per the race schedule, beginning no earlier than 9:00 A.M. and concluding no later than 6:00 P.M. each date and not exceeding 90 dB 100' from the race track; 7.2 Approve eight (8) racing dates requested by the TTA and hosted by CJ Racing, Inc. for auto races in the automobile classifications and schedule, beginning no earlier than 9:00 A,M, and concluding no later than 6:00 P.M. each date and not exceeding 90 dB 100' from the race track. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next adjourned regular meeting: June 1, 2000, for the purpose of a CIP Workshop, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\052300 9 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2000-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2000-05 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberrs ROLLCALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberrs PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENTCALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 2000. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next adjourned regular meeting: June 1, 2000, for the purpose of a CIP Workshop, to follow the Community Services District Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\052300 10 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 14 Antenna Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ANTENNA ORDINANCE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0242) 14.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242) 14.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER '17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA 97-0242) R:~Agenda\052300 11 COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Old Town Local Review Board APPointment RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Appoint throe applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Old Town Local Review Board. 16 Consideration of Sponsorship request for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Consider the sponsorship request of $30,000 for the Temecula Valley lnternational Film Festival; 16.2 Approve a transfer of $30,000 from the Community Service funding to the Economic Development sponsorship budget. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next adjourned regular meeting: City Council, June 1, 2000, 6:00 P.M., for the purpose of a CIP Workshop, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\052300 12 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section I. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,043,215.35. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 23rd day of May 2000. A'FrEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Resos 1 STATE Of CALIFORNIA) COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of May, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Resos 2(X)O- CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/03100 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/11/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/23/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/11/00 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05~23~00 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 728,829.73 92,012.65 16,407.93 27,631.46 26,733.81 386.34 298,768.09 601,365,97 714.44 20,029.30 12,394.53 120,765,50 684,242.78 1,046,885.55 191,321.52 2,043,215.35 100 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY JADA YONKER, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 135,940,39 36,994.48 1,963.69 394.25 2,069.66 416.69 3,906.07 1,197.96 191,321.52 2,043,215.36 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/03/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/11/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/23/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 0~11/00 TOTALPAYROLLRUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR ~5/23/00 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 210 280 300 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCBD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 100 165 190 193 194 280 3C0 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY~CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: IPRE~~IRECTO F FINANCYONf/~~EG SPECIALIST SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER $ 120,765.50 684,242.78 %046,885.55 191,321.52 $ 2,043,215.35 728,829.73 14,761.15 92,012,65 16,407.93 27,631.46 26,733.81 386.34 298.768.09 601,365.97 714.44 20,029,30 11,858.43 12,394.53 135,940.39 3,918.84 36,994.48 394.25 2,069.66 416.69 3,906,07 4,519.50 $ 1,851,893.83 191,321.52 $ 2,043,215.35 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 5/03/00 11:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 9,474.79 14,798.90 517.75 5#980.48 78.49 2,807.85 9,584.20 7,513.44 TOTAL 120,765.50 OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 5/03/00 11:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS OUCHER/ HECK CHECK UMBER DATE 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62124 05/03/00 62125 05/03/00 62126 05/03/00 62126 05/03/00 62127 05/03/00 62128 05/03/00 62128 05/03/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GRODP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC A G K GROUP LLC 004096 A LINE TELEPHONE 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, 000101 APPLE ONE~ INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 62129 05/03/00 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 62129 05/03/00 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 62129 05/03/00 001323 ARROWNEAD WATER 62130 05/03/00 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 62131 05/03/00 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS 62132 05/03/00 BOSTRE-LE, ANNIE 62133 05/03/00 004126 BROOKS, JIM 62134 05/03/00 BUDGE, BRENT 62135 05/03/00 002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND 62135 05/03/00 002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND 62135 05/03/00 002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND 62135 05/03/00 002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND 62136 05/03/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE 62137 05/03/00 62137 05/03/00 62138 05/03/00 62138 05/03/00 62138 05/03/00 62138 05/03/00 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO ITEM DESCRIPTION REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 REFD: PW99-0311 PA99-0310/0309 INSTALL PHONE WIRES:STOREFRONT DOCENT & VOLUNTEERS BUS TOUR DOCENT & VOLUNTEERS BUS TOUR CITY RECORDS STORAGE UNIT TEMP HELP W/E 04/15 HOOVER TEMP HELP W/E 04/15 MCKEIGHAN BOTTLED WTR SERVS-MNTC FAC BOTTLED WTR SERVS- CRC BOTTLED WTR SERVS-CITY HALL ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-4107 001-161-4107 001-163-4107 001-163-4358 001-163-4115 001-161-4129 001-163-4129 001-163-4388 001-171-4036 001-170-502-5221 190-185-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-120-999-5277 001-161-999-5118 190-180-999-5118 340-199-701-5250 190-182-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-1665 DESIGNED JULY 4TH LOGO 190-183-999-5370 REIMB:SIERRA TRAINING:3/20-24 001-163-999-5261 CALF ROPING FOR WESTERN DAYS 280-199-999-5362 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990 SAFETY ORANGE T-SHIRTS:PW MNTC SALES TAX SAFETY ORANGE T-SHIRTS:PW MNTC SALES TAX REFRSHMNT:DIF MTG W/COUNCILMBR JACKETS FOR COUNCIL:RR & JS SALES TAX JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- SR CTR JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- MRTC FAC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- CRC JARITORIAL SUPPLIES- TCC 001-164-601-5243 001-164-601-5243 001-164-601-5243 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5265 001-100-999-5265 190-181-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 177.50 2,064.00 184.00 1,800.09 703.00 390.00 1,373,00 150.00 339.00 22.50 425.00 910.00 515.00 262.00 85.61 258.00 468.00 332.80 126.83 24.74 278.66 67,50 500.00 144.27 75.00 100,00 235.50 18.25 393,00 30.46 10.32 155.00 12,01 119.49 119.49 119,49 142.55 CHECK AMOUNT 8,538.09 515,00 347.61 258.00 800.80 430.23 67.50 500.00 144.27 75,00 100.00 677.21 10,32 167.01 501.02 OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 5/03/00 11:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS OUCHER/ HECK UMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62139 05/03/00 62140 05/03/00 62140 05/03/00 003986 COZAD & TNOMSEN INC SURVEYING SVC:R.C.SPTS PRK-LOT 002661 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC INC CRC GENERATOR MNTC AND REPAIRS 002661 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC INC CRC GENERATOR MNTC AND REPAIRS 210-190-175-5802 190-182-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 2,950.00 119.66 437.35 2,950.00 557.01 62141 05/03/00 62142 05/03/00 62142 05/03/00 62143 05/03/00 001009 D B X INC 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING 002954 DIAMOND GARAGE DOOR INC INSTALL TRAFFIC LOOP DETECTORS RESIDENTIAL IMPROV:CAALIM RESIDENTIAL IMPROV:FEDERICO RESIDENTIAL IMPROV:CAALIM 001-164-602-5412 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 2,760.00 414.00 2,585.00 640.00 2,760.00 2,999.00 640.00 62144 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62145 05/03/00 62146 05/03/00 62146 05/03/00 DURIE, TRUDI L. 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN REFD:SECURITY DEPT/ADD'T TIME TEMP HELP W/E 04/21SALAZAR TEMP NELP W/E 04/21WILLIAMS TEMP HELP W/E 04/21THORNSLEY TEMP HELP W/E 04/21DEGANGE TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 HILLBERG TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 SHAH, MALA TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 KRUEGER REFRSHMRT:INTERVIEW PANEL O.T. REFSHMENTS:CLOSED SESSION MTG 190-183-4990 001-162-999-5118 001'162-999-5118 001'161'999'5118 001-161-999-5118 001-163-999-5118 320-199-999-5118 280-199-999-5250 001-100-999-5260 80.00 894.74 1,231.20 2,677.81 2,940.80 1,439.20 1,533.48 1,916.00 57.72 130.88 80.00 12,633.23 188.60 62147 05/03/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSCP IMPROV:SADDLEWOOD 193-180-999-5212 90.00 90.00 62148 05/03/00 62148 05/03/00 62148 05/03/00 62148 05/03/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST HANKCARD CENTER 62149 05/03/00 FORTUNE XX-1405 UBNOSKE:UCLA EXTENSION XX-1405 UBNOSKE:INTERVIEW PANL XX-1405 UBNOSKE:AIR:C,D,:UNITE XX-1405 UBNOSKE:AIR:F.D.:UNITE 2 YR SUBSCRIPTION:ECON DEVEL 001-161-999-5261 001-161-999-5260 001-161-999-5258 001-1170 250.00 47.72 417.61 417.61 51.74 1,132.94 51.74 62150 05/03/00 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-6506 JEFF STONE 62150 05/03/00 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5200 320-199-999-5208 25.39 82.31 107.70 62151 05/03/00 GILLILAND, ROSIN REIMB:SISTER CITIES TRIP:4/13 001-101-999-5280 62152 05/03/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE 001-170-999-5229 220.81 17.67 220.81 17.67 62153 05/03/00 004125 GRAYDON, KEN & PHEE COWBOY POETRY FOR WESTERN DAYS 280-199-999-5362 62154 05/03/00 GRIFFIN, DONNA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 62155 05/03/00 HADAEGH, ALICIA REFUND:GYMNASTICS-KINDER TUMB 190-183-4982 62155 05/03/00 HADAEGN, ALICIA REFUND: PREGNANCY YOGA 190-183-4982 62156 05/03/00 000378 HAFELI, THOMAS REIMB:CD ROMS 4 MUSIC ON HOLD 320-199-999-5221 62157 05/03/00 HAMAMOTO, AILEEN REFUND: SPORTS-BH FUND-INT. 190-183-4982 200.00 100.00 46.00 48.00 123.97 35.00 200.00 100.00 94.00 123.97 35.00 OUCHRE2 5/03/00 11:45 OUCHER/ HECK CHECK UMBER DATE 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62158 05/03/00 62159 05/03/00 62160 05/03/00 62161 05/03/00 62162 05/03/00 62163 05/03/00 62164 05/03/00 62165 05/03/00 62166 05/03/00 62167 05/03/00 62167 05/03/00 62168 05/03/00 62169 05/03/00 62170 05/03/00 62170 05/03/00 62171 05/03/00 62172 05/03/00 62173 05/03/00 62174 05/03/00 62175 05/03/00 62175 05/03/00 62175 05/03/00 62175 05/03/00 62175 05/03/00 62175 05/03/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HAYGOOD, MARCIA HILTON, MARIA 001119 HOUSTON & HARRIS PIPE C 003938 IAN DAVIDSON LANDSCAPE 004050 IMAGE SOURCE 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL JIMENEZ, CLEMENT KAPPEL, JACQUELINE 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SERVICES KJOS, TAMRA 004087 LOWEIS 004087 LOWE'S 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I 002887 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION HARDWARE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES- PW MNTC NARDWARE SUPPLIES- RECREATION HARDWARE SUPPLIES- CRC HARDWARE SUPPLIES- RECREATION HARDWARE SUPPLIES-RECREATION HARDWARE SUPPLIES- PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES- TCC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - MUSEUM REFUND: SKYHAWKS MINI-HAWKS REIMB: PRINTED DOOR HANGERS CITY WIDE CATCH BASIN CLEANING PRGSS PMT:2ND ST PRK-LOT LDSCP 545 DRUM UNIT FOR P,W, FAX CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS REIMB:OPEN CHARREL SEM:3/27-31 REFUND:GYMNASTICS-KINDER TUMB 30"X94" AMERICAN FLAG BARRERS STORAGE/CLEARING & FREIGHT TEMP HELP W/E 04/16 MUELLER REFUND: SKYHAWKS MINI-HAWKS DISHWASHER FOR UPSTAIRS C.HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES- CITY HALL MAR UMPIRE SERVICES CONSULTING SERVICES:4/18-28 TOOLS/EQUIP-TRAF SIGNAL MAINT INSPECT/MAINT LIFT @ MAINT FAC CITY SEAL LTRHD/ENVELOPES:PW CITY SEAL LTRHD/ENVELOPES:PW CITY SEAL LTRHD/ENVELOPES:PW CITY SEAL LTRHD/ENVELOPES:PW SALES TAX SALES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-199-701-5212 190-180-999-5301 190'182-999-5212 190-180-999-5301 190'180-999-5301 190-180'999'5212 190'180'999-5212 190'184-999-5212 190'185-999-5212 190-183-4982 001-164-601-5268 001-164-601-5401 210'165-828-5802 330-199'999-5220 190-182-999-5212 001'163'999-5261 190-183-4982 001-111-999-5271 001-111-999'5271 330-199-999-5118 190-183-4982 340'199-701-5212 340-199-701-5212 190'183-999-5380 001'161'999-5248 001-164-602-5242 340-199'702'5212 001-163-999-5222 001-164-602-5222 001-164'604-5222 001-165-999-5222 001-163-999-5222 001-164-602-5222 ITEM AM(XJNT 407.59 40.09 70.07 443.78 150.00 71.70 550,00 51.40 20.84 29.03 5.00 80.81 600.00 2,054.44 207.96 249.87 258,30 41.00 125.00 35.55 192.45 40.00 516.09 2.13 2,640.00 2,405.00 332.37 110.78 103.31 103.31 103.31 103.31 8.01 8.01 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 1,834.50 5.00 80.81 600.00 2,054.44 207.96 249.87 258.30 41.00 160.55 192.45 40.00 518.22 2,640.00 2,405.00 332.37 110.78 OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 5/03/00 11:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS OUCHER/ HECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT UMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62175 05/03/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 62175 05/03/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 62176 05/03/00 NAPOLITANO, MIKE 001-164-604-5222 001-165-999-5222 REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD97-087GR 001-2670 8.00 995.00 445.27 995.00 62177 05/03/00 002292 OASIS VENDING SUPPLY SERVICE FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 486.05 486.05 62178 05/03/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 168.25 168.25 62179 05/03/00 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER TYPEWRITER MAINT/REPAIR:PLAN 001-161-999-5217 65.00 65.00 62180 05/03/00 OLSEN, KIRSTEN REFUND: EXERCISE-BELLY-BEG. 190-183-4982 26.25 26.25 62181 05/03/00 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES APR LAKE MAINT SVCS:DUCK POND 190-180-999-5212 62181 05/03/00 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES MAY LAKE MAINT SVCS:DUCK POND 190-180-999-5212 62182 05/03/00 000733 PARTY PZAZZ LINEN RENTAL FOR COUNCIL MTG 001-110-999-5260 800.00 800.00 70.00 1,600.00 70.00 62183 05/03/00 003218 PELA 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62184 05/03/00 000246 62185 05/03/00 62186 05/03/00 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR REISSUE CK#61413:FEB PLN CK SV 001-161-999-5250 7,270.00 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 24,329.04 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 698.72 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,371.59 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 .83 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 286.61 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 83.65 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 300.25 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 78.26 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 658.32 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 147.67 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 584.54 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 164.02 000246 PERS-PRE 190-2130 .63 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130 .16 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130 1.88 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130 .47 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 79.93 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 16.99 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.28 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .29 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .23 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 1.86 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65 1ST CLASS PRESORT FEE RENEWAL 330-199-999-5250 RES IMPROVE PRGM:C.CNEATNEM 165-199-813-5804 100.00 1,120.00 7,270,00 31,813.59 100.00 1,120.00 DUCNRE2 5/03/00 11:45 DUDHER/ HECK CHECK JMBER DATE 62187 05/03/00 62187 05/03/00 62188 05/03/00 62189 05/03/00 62189 05/03/00 62189 05/03/00 62190 05/03/00 62191 05/03/00 62192 05/03/00 62193 05/03/00 62194 05/03/00 62194 05/03/00 62195 05/03/00 62196 05/03/00 62196 05/03/00 62197 05/03/00 62198 05/03/00 62199 05/03/00 62200 05/03/00 62201 05/03/00 62201 05/03/00 62201 05/03/00 62201 05/03/00 62201 05/03/00 62201 05/03/00 62202 05/03/00 62202 05/03/00 62203 05/03/00 62204 05/03/00 62205 05/03/00 62206 05/03/00 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 002880 PRO-CRAFT SASH & SUPPLY 002880 PRO-CRAFT SASH & SUPPLY RACKLEFF, NICOLE ITEM DESCRIPTION RES IMPROVE PRGM:C.CHEATHEM CREDIT:PORTION PAID BY CUST. REFUND: TINY TOTS-TERRIFC 3'S 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUP BLUEPRINTS:IST ST EXTEN. 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUP BLUEPRINTS:PALA RD 8RIDGE 000947 RANCNO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUP BLUEPRINTS:SR EXPANSION 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST APR:O2-79-10100-1:NW SPORTS PK 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN MER WARRANTY EXTENSION:P-15 TRUCK 003761 003591 003591 000266 RIGHTWAY ROBERTSON, JUDI ROBERTSON~ JUDI 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY 001942 S C SIGNS 003734 SHERWOOD, ALAN K. 000645 SMART & FINAL 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000519 000519 SPRING, JAN 003840 STRONGS PAINTING 000305 TARGET STORE 004076 TEMECULA CREEK LEARNING ACCOUNT NUMBER 165'199'813-5804 165-199-813-5804 190-183-4980 280-199-807-5804 210-165-631-5804 190'180'999'5268 190-1270 001-171-999-5214 RANCHO GLENOAKS H.O.A. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 RANCHO METALS & SUPPLY METAL SUPPLIES FOR VAR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE POST EMERGENT SPRAYING:VAR LOC 001'164'601'5402 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE LITTER REMOVAL VAR LOCATIONS 001-164-601-5402 MAY EQUIP RENTAL:RIVERTON PARK 190-180-999-5238 REFUND:SEC DEP/ROOM RENTAL 190-2900 REFUND:SEC DEP/ROOM RENTAL 190-183-4990 RES IMPROVE PRGM:L.CAAL|M 165-199'813'5804 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING SIGNS 001-161-999-5256 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS RED SUPPLIES FOR TCC APR:2-OO-397-5042:VARIOUS LOC APR:2-OO-397-5042:VARIOUS LOC APR:2-OO-397-5042:VARIOUS LOC APR:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 APR:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 190-183-999-5330 190P184-999-5301 340-199-701-5240 191-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 CREDIT: LATE CHARGE FEES SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CRC PEST CONTROL SERVICES SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCS REFUND: SKYHAWKS MINI-HAWKS PAINT WALLS/DOORS @ CITY HALL MISD SUPPLIES FOR SR CENTER MILEAGE-TRAINER:MGMT RETREAT 191-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-183-4982 340-199-701-5212 190-181-999-5301 001-150-999-5265 ITEM AMOUNT 915.00 325.00- 47.00 7.25 6.04 25.98 232.31 499.00 100.00 26.93 1,445.00 1,250.00 62.89 100.00 75.00 1,986.00 65.00 240.00 89.26 4,338.63 91.88 402.55 788.98 25.79 3.46- 42.00 40.00 5.00 500.00 46.27 62.30 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 590.00 47.00 39.27 232.31 499.00 100.00 26.93 2,695.00 62.89 175.00 1,986.00 65.00 240.00 89.26 51644.37 82.00 5.00 500.00 46.27 62.30 OUCHRE2 5/03/00 11:45 OUCHER/ HECK CHECK UMBER DATE 62207 05/03/00 62208 05/03/00 62209 05/03/00 62210 05/03/00 62210 05/03/00 62211 05/03/00 62211 05/03/00 62212 05/03/00 62213 05/03/00 62214 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 62215 05/03/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 003545 THINK JACOBSON & ROTH 001483 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOMRA PACIFIC INC. TOMRA PACiFiC iNC. 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 003691 TRAFFICWARE CORPORATION WASSMUTH, NANCY 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION H[LLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TROPHIES FOR SPORTS ACTIVITIES C/O #4 DESIGN SVCS:MUSEUM MAR CONSULTING SVCS:IST ST BRG REFUND:PLN CK FEES:PAO0-O087 REFUND:PLN CK FEES:PAO0-O087 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR B&S OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR R&S TRAFFIC SOFTWARE EQUIP:PW REFUND: SPORTS-TENNIS-BEG/JR CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAR LEASE OF (3) 5365 COPIERS MAR LEASE OF DC240 COPIER MAR INTEREST ON COPIER LEASES MAR POOLED MAINT FOR COPIERS MAR LEASE OF TCC COPIER MAR LEASE OF 5800 COPIER MAR INTEREST ON 5800 COPIER ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5380 210-190-808-5804 280-199'807'5804 001-161-4119 001-163-4388 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-164-602-5242 190-183-4982 190-182-999-5212 330-2800 330-2800 330-199-999-5391 330-199-999-5217 190-184-999-5239 330-2800 330-199-999-5391 ITEM AMOUNT 46.71 970.00 880.00 176.00 14.00 180.58 259.07 1,729.00 25.00 237.42 1~267.33 351.75 561.42 4,373.22 120.54 1,651.29 7~0.18 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 46.71 970.00 880.00 190.00 439.65 I~729.00 25.00 237.42 %055.73 TOTAL CHECKS 120,765.50 )UCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 15 ;/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 188w757.32 37,970.75 27#631.46 3#312.06 301.93 631362.04 319,158.96 635.95 TOTAL 684~242.78 )UCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 ;/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS IUCHER/ 4ECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT IMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AHOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62217 05/08/00 002578 TEMEKU HILLS REC LLC LEAGUE OF CITIES:GEN MTG:MAY 001-2640 62217 05/08/00 002578 TEMEKU HILLS REC LLC LEAGUE OF CITIES:GEN MTG:MAY 001-110-999-5260 62217 05/08/00 002578 TEMEKU HILLS REC LLC LEAGUE OF CITIES:GER MTG:MAY 001-120-999-5260 62217 05/08/00 002578 TEMEKU HILLS REC LLC LEAGUE OF CITIES:GEN MTG:MAY 001-100-999-5260 1,259.20 30.00 60.00 150.00 588278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 20,534.48 ~88278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 497.68 ~88278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 4,666.87 ~88278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 262.48 ~88278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 91.86 ~88278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 202.31 ~88278 05/11/00 000283 iNSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 22.28 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 838.95 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 183.67 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 527.94 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 5,152.56 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 165-2070 145.92 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 190-2070 1,312.75 588278 05/11/00 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 70.22 588278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 15.89 588278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 68.67 588278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 15.54 588278 05/11/00 000283 [RSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 166.00 588278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 43.16 588278 05/11/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 160.51 1,499.20 34,979.74 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 81.32 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 2.61 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 83.30 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 2.18 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 280-2070 .61 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 5.70 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 3.62 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 7.11 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 5,581.12 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 145.48 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 995.09 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 50.71 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 25.97 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 57.88 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 4.85 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 192.96 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 39.47 588336 05/11/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 106.96 7,386.94 62220 05/11/00 001985 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO MEMBERSHIP DUES: T. THORNSLEY 001-161-999-5226 80.00 80.00 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 DANCER 001-2330 234.50 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 224.80 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 HOSP IC 001-2330 17.50 1UCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 ~/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS )UCHER/ IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM IMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 001-2330 614.40 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 190-2330 112.00 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 193-2330 9.60 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 194-2330 3.20 62221 05/11/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 340-2330 9.60 1,281.40 62222 05/11/00 001104 A R M A INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL CF-EXPO:FLORES & JONES 001-120-999-5277 1,290.00 1,290.00 62223 05/11/00 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 602.19 62223 05/11/00 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190'2310 62.87 62223 05/11/00 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 194-2310 2.23 62223 05/11/00 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340'2310 24.15 691.44 62224 05/11/00 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC BILLBOARD IN OLD TOWN 280'199-999-5362 400.00 62224 05/11/00 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC BILLBOARD AD FOR OLD TOWN TEM 280'199-999-5362 1,351.00 1,751.00 62225 05/11/00 ADAMS, AY~RON LEGISLATIVE DAYS CF 4/24'25/00 001-110-999-525B 250.37 250.37 62226 05/11/00 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT REL RETERTION:PW99-OT:PAVEMENT 210-2035 45,678.50 45,678.50 62227 05/11/00 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS HP LASERJET PRINTER 320-1970 1,501.50 62227 05/11/00 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS FREIGHT 320-1970 79.00 62227 05/11/00 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS SALES TAX 320-1970 116.37 1,696.87 62228 05/11/00 62228 05/11/00 62228 05/11/00 003607 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SA FIRST AID SUPPLIES i CRC 190-182-999-5301 242.44 003607 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SA FIRST AID SUPPLIES SPT/SKATE P 190-183-999-5305 121.22 003607 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SA FIRST AID SUPPLIES SPT/SICATE P 190-183-999-5380 121.22 484.88 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 62229 05/11/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORM RENTALS:PW MNTC CREW 001-164-601-5243 102.16 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CITY NALL 340-199-701-5250 83.40 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5250 34.20 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:SR CTR 190-181-999-5250 51.36 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL: CRC 190-182-999-5250 96.00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL: TCC 190-184-999-5250 36.96 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORM RENTALS:TCSD MNTC CREW 190-180-999-5243 70.00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV CREDIT:NO CHARGE FOR MEW EE 001'164-601-5243 27.50- 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV CREDIT:CHRGED UNIFORMS TWICE 190-182-999-5250 10.83- 435.75 62230 05/11/00 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:RYAN HURST 001-164-601-5214 43.00 62230 05/11/00 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: MARK LEVIS 001-164-601-5214 53.00 62230 05/11/00 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: MIKE WOLFF 001-165-999-5214 43.00 62230 05/11/00 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: R.BROWNELL 001-162-999-5214 43.00 182.00 62231 05/11/00 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL CITYWIDE A.C. SAW CUTTING FOR 001-164-601-5402 4,950.00 4,950.00 62232 05/11/00 RINGHAM, JANET REFUND:EX-LAW WELK CHORUS LINE 190-183-4986 30.00 30.00 62233 05/11/00 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 62234 05/11/00 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE SOLU FURNITURE FOR SW POLICE STN 190-183-999-5330 285.60 285.60 001-170-502-5242 4,213.06 4,213.06 )UCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 i/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 3UCHER/ tECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR JMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 62235 05/11/00 62235 05/11/00 62236 05/11/00 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SO 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SO 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES 62237 05/11/00 C E L S 0 C ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT ON'SITE COMPUTER TRAINING ON'SITE COMPUTER TRAINING 320-199-999-5261 320-199-999-5261 OLD TWH RESTROOM RENTAL 280-199-999-5234 SUBDIVISION MAP & LAND USE LAW 001-161-999-5228 474.75 4,500.00 826.00 497.10 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 001-2380 1,389.81 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 165-2380 39.30 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 190'2380 262.87 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 193-2380 16.96 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 194-2380 4.70 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 280-2380 17.22 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 300'2380 4.48 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 320-2380 38.47 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G H A 003553 LTD 330-2380 8.33 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 340-2380 34.83 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G H A 003553 STD 001-2500 1,939.88 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 165-2500 54.85 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 190-2500 366.91 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 193-2500 23.68 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 194-2500 6.56 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 280'2500 24.03 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 300'2500 6.25 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 320'2500 53.70 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 330'2500 11.62 62238 05/11/00 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 340'2500 48.63 62240 05/11/00 003138 CAL MAT 62241 05/11/00 PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY HELIUM FOR TCSD EVENTS 001-164-601-5218 190-180-999-5301 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 62242 05/11/00 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS REFSHMNTS:CHILD'S DAY LUNCH 001-150-999-5265 REFSHMNT:ADMIN PANEL INTERVIEW 001-150-999-5260 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 62243 05/11/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE 62243 05/11/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE 62244 05/11/00 002782 CHICK~S SPORTING GOODS 62244 05/11/00 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS 62244 05/11/00 002782 CHICK~S SPORTING GOODS 16 DZN SOFTBALLS FREIGHT SALES TAX 1,440.82 28.34 578.50 13.01 125.24 8.67 1.95 6.49 1.62 13.00 6.50 18.52 33.94 8.37 607.84 51.00 47.11 4,974.75 826.00 497.10 4,353.08 1,440.82 28.34 773.50 42.31 705.95 62245 05/11/00 003534 CLOUD PRODUCTIONS 10 VHS TAPE:"EVERY 15 MINUTES" 001-170-999-5371 43.10 IUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 i/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS )UCHER/ tECK CHECK JMBER DATE 62245 05/11/00 62245 05/11/00 62246 05/11/00 62246 05/11/00 62247 05/11/00 62248 05/11/00 62248 05/11/00 62249 05/11/00 62249 05/11/00 62249 05/11/00 62250 05/11/00 62250 05/11/00 62250 05/11/00 62251 05/11/00 62252 05/11/00 62253 05/11/00 62254 05/11/00 62254 05/11/00 62255 05/11/00 62255 05/11/00 62255 05/11/00 62255 05/11/00 62256 05/11/00 62256 05/11/00 62256 05/11/00 62256 05/11/00 62257 05/11/00 62258 05/11/00 62258 05/11/00 62259 05/11/00 62259 05/11/00 62259 05/11/00 62259 05/11/00 62260 05/11/00 62261 05/11/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 003534 CLOUD PRODUCTIONS 003534 CLOUD PRODUCTIONS 001193 COMP U S A INC 001193 COMP U S A INC 001275 COMPUSERVE 000447 COMTRONiX OF HEMET 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO CUNDIFF, DAN 001009 D B X INC 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI 004032 DISCOVERY CHANNEL SGHO0 004032 DISCOVERY CHANNEL SCHO0 004032 DISCOVERY CHANNEL SCHO0 004032 DISCOVERY CHANNEL SCHO0 DON VEASEY CONSTRUCTION DON VEASEY CONSTRUCTION DON VEASEY CONSTRUCTION DON VEASEY CONSTRUCTION 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO 001945 E A MENDOZA CONTRACTING 001945 E A MENDOZA CONTRACTING 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC D01380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 000395 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CO 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION ITEM DESCRIPTION 5 VHS TAPES:"EVERY 15 MINUTES" VIDEO TAPE RE-EDIT & DUPLICATE MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE REMOVE RADIO FROM B&S VEHICLE REMOVE RADIO FROM B&S VEHICLE ELECT REPAIRS 8 CRC ELECT REPAIRS IN OLD TOWN SALES TAX JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:PRKS & REC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL REFUND: OVERPAYMENT PA99-0476 INSTALL:FLASHING SCHOOL BEACON RETAIN PUBL ADVOCACY:FED FUND SCHEMATIC DESIGN SENIOR CENTER CONTINGENCY-DESIGN SENIOR CTR MUSEUM VIDEO:REAL AMER COWBOY MUSEUM VIDEO:BUFFALO SOLDIERS SHIPPING & HANDLING SALES TAX PROJECT WITHDRAWN 50% REFUND PROJECT WITHDRAWN 50% REFUND PROJECT WITHDRAWN 50% REFUND PROJECT WITHDRAWN 50% REFUND SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL STOP NOTICE INCURRED LEGAL FEE REL:STOP NOTICE:SUNWEST PW9716 TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 HAMSEN TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 HAMSEN TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 HAMSEN TEMP HELP W/E 04/21HANSEN REIMB: AUDIT EXPENSES GEOTECHNICAL SVC:PUJOL SIDEWLK ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-170-999-5371 001-170-999-5371 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5228 001-162-999-5215 001-162-999-5215 190-182-999-5212 001-164-603-5212 001-164-603-5212 190-180-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 001-2650 210-165-672-5804 001-110-999-5248 210-190-163-5802 190-185-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 001-161-4107 001-163-4107 001-163-4388 001-171-4036 001-164-601-5218 300-199-999-5205 210-2038 190-180-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-111-999-5264 210-165-826-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 21.55 650.00 138.92 9.95 120.00 120.00 206.88 900.00 69.75 13.15 71.22 43.05 9.00 810.00 2,000.00 1,836.00 24.95 24.95 6.50 4.38 1,531.40 683.00 123.14 531.46 74.99 648.02- 2,118,36 305.10 193.23 945.81 183.06 1,500.00 1,146.27 CHECK AMOUNT 714.65 1,143.08 9.95 240.00 1,176.63 127.42 9.00 810.00 2,000.00 3,636.00 60.78 2,869.00 74.99 1,470.34 1,627.20 1,500.00 11146.27 )UCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 5 i/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ~CHER/ IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM }MBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62262 05/11/00 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R GIS SOFTWARE SUPPORT 62263 05/11/00 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION FEB PLAN CHECKING SVCS 001-161-610-5606 001-162-999-5248 2,054.91 4,914.44 2,054.91 4,914.44 62264 05/11/00 003623 EXCEL HARDWARE HARDWARE SUPPLIES:PW MNTC CREW 001-164-601-5218 47.39 47.39 62265 05/11/00 000478 FAST SIGNS SIGNS FOR MUSEUM 190-185-999-5254 341.35 341.35 62266 05/11/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 62266 05/11/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230 62266 05/11/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-164-604-5230 62266 05/11/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 320-199-999-5230 62266 05/11/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-111-999-5230 62266 05/11/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 32.23 27.66 12.20 25.19 17.53 12.20 127.01 62267 05/11/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT:27070 FALLING CR 165-199-813-5804 150.00 150.00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 62268 05/11/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-7824 COMERCHERO:SW AIR-SMF 001-100-999-5258 XX-9798 STONE:HTL:OSAI(A DAIICH 001-100-999-5258 XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:SW AIR:SMF XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:MTG:BAILY WI XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:AMER AIR:ORD XX-9913 G ROBERTS:UNITED TKT XX-6165 YATES:MTG:FISH HOUSE XX-6165 YATES:MTG:RED ROBIN XX-6165 YATES:MTG:BLACK ANGUS 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5258 001-140-999-5258 001-150-999-5261 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5260 XX-0515 THORNHILL:MTG:MARIE CA 001-161-999-5260 XX-0432 ELMO:MTG/HUNGRY HUNTER 001-162-999-5260 123.00 53.23 123.00 48.19 469.00 250.00 45.00 119.00 33.00 37.79 57,38 358.59 62269 05/11/00 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 ST DED 001-2140 202.80 202.80 62270 05/11/00 62270 05/11/00 62270 05/11/00 62270 05/11/00 62270 05/11/00 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA ' PAYM 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA ' PAYM 909 308-1289 SAM PRATT 909 308-2629 HIKE NAGGAR 909 506-1408 PD STOREFRONT 909 506-2626 POLICE DEPT 909 695-3539 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-170-999'5229 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999'5208 73.82 146.64 123.68 340.31 37.36 721.81 62271 05/11/00 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA INC 62271 05/11/00 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA INC MAY ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE 320'199-999-5208 MAY ACCESS'RVSD CO OPEN LINE 320'199-999-5208 320.00 320.00 640.00 62272 05/11/00 004146 GILLILAND, ROBIN REIMB:SIS CITIES CENTERPIECES 001-101-999-5280 82.14 82,14 62273 05/11/00 62273 05/11/00 62273 05/11/00 62273 05/11/00 622}'3 05/11/00 6227'3 05/11/00 62273 05/11/00 62273 05/11/00 622}3 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLERNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY MANAGER OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN RESOURCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY OFFICE SUPPLIES:BDLG & SAFETY OFFICE SUPPLIES: MUSEUM OFFICE SUPPLIES: CRC OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 001-110-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 190-185-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 167.37 527.45 149.67 260.22 474.83 153.55 34.34 143.55 94.36 ~CBRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 ;/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS )UCHER/ rECK GXECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT JMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:SR CENTER 190-181-999-5220 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:RDA-LOD/MOD 165-199-999-5220 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:RDA-LOD/MOD 280-199-999-5220 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:RDA-LOD/MOD 165-199-999-5220 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:RDA-LOD/MOD 280-199-999-5220 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:RECORDS MGMT 001-120-999-5277 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:RECORDS MGMT 001-120-999-5277 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:ECON DEVEL 001-111-999-5220 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT LITERATURE RACK:STOREFRONT 001-170-502-5242 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT SALES TAX 001-170-502-5242 62273 05/11/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5242 62274 05/11/00 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITB CITY SEAL STICKERS 001-120-999-5222 62274 05/11/00 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITB ADDTL ART COSTS FOR STICKERS 001-120-999-5222 62274 05/11/00 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH SALES TAX 001-120-999-5222 62275 05/11/00 62276 05/11/00 62277 05/11/00 62278 05/11/00 62279 05/11/00 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING:STOREFRONT 001-170-999-5229 GREENBELT ALLIANCE PUBLICATION:BOUND FOR SUCCESS 001-161-999-5228 GUEVARA, EDWARD REFUND: MCP PICNIC SHELTER 190-183-4988 004133 H D L SOFTWARE LLC ANNUAL MAIHT FEE FOR BDL B/L 320-199-999-5211 000186 HANKS BARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 73.91 40.76 40.76 51.95 51.95 74.65 62.04 102.29 387.66 30.04 96.49 981.00 204.00 91.84 109.80 7.00 25.00 3,600.00 51.51 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 179.20- 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 160.50 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.37 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK IHC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.37 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 179.20 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 160.50 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.38 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74 62280 05/11/00 002107 HIGHMARK ING 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.36 62281 05/11/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP CRC MOP DUST FOR GYM FLOOR 190-182-999-5212 62281 05/11/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP FREIGHT 190-182-999-5212 62281 05/11/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 62282 05/11/00 000194 I C M A 62282 05/11/00 000194 I C M A 62282 05/11/00 000194 I C M A 62282 05/11/00 000194 I C M A 62282 05/11/00 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 193-2080 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 194-2080 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 62283 05/11/00 001314 I E S - A P A 62283 05/11/00 001314 I E S - A P A APA AWARD DINNER:PLANNING STAF 001-162-999-5260 APA AWARD DINNER:PLANNING STAF 001-161-999-5260 53.90 7.00 4.18 2,224.87 407.68 30.00 21.37 24.65 28.00 203.00 CHECK AMOUNT 3,017.84 'l,276.84 109.80 7.00 25.00 3,600.00 51.51 358.40 65.08 2,708.57 231.00 'OUCHRE2 ~5/11/00 'OUCHEN/ :NECK !UMBER 62284 62285 62286 62286 62287 62288 62289 62290 62291 62292 62293 62294 62295 62295 62296 62297 62298 62298 62299 62299 62299 62299 62299 62299 62299 62300 62301 62301 62301 62301 62302 62302 62302 12:27 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK DATE 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 05/11/00 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 003816 J D C INC 004119 J T B SUPPLY 004119 J T B SUPPLY 004079 JENKENS & GILENRIST 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 2 WESTERN DAY BANNERS 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 04/16 STATTER 002789 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-182-999'5212 REL RETENTION:PW98-01CSD:B.PRK 210-2035 PANTS FOR FLASHING BEACON 001-164-602"5405 SALES TAX 001-164-602-5405 LEGAL SVCS FOR HUMAN RESOUNCE 001-130-999-5247 CONSULTANT SVC:LAND DEVEL REVW 001-163-999-5248 280'199-999-5271 001-111'999-5118 330'199'999'5118 RFD:DEPST LD97-O89GR,PA96-0317 001-2670 GEOTECNNICAL SVC:PALA RD 8RDG 210'165'631'5801 DESIGN SVC RCSP TOT LOT RENOV. 210-190-145'5802 KIHCO STAFFING SERVICES TEMP HELP W/E 04/23 MUELLER KLAER BRITTAIN INC. 003631 KLEINFELDER INE 002499 L D KING INC 002519 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC DRUM SYSTEMS & FUNNEL:PW MNTC 001-164-601-5430 002519 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC FNEIGHT 001-164-601-5430 LAFCO APPL FEES: VAIL RANCH ANNEX 001-110-999-5307 003605 LAKE ELSINORE STORM DEPOSIT: TICKETS FOR TEAM PACE 001'2175 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT C(~4MIS PUB:uDESIGN SUSTAINABLE COMM" 001'161'999-5228 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS RENEWAL:LIVABLE PLACES UPDATES 001'161'999'5228 004087 LOWE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES:FIRE DEPT 001'171'999'5242 004087 LOWEIS CNEDIT: NETUNNED ITEMS 001-171-999-5242 004087 LOWEIS HANDWANE SUPPLIES:FINE DEPT 001-171-999-5242 004087 LOWEIS NARDWARE SUPPLIES:FINE DEPT 001-171"999-5242 004087 LOWEIS HARDWARE SUPPLIES:FINE DEPT 001-171-999-5242 004087 LOWEIS HARDWARE SUPPLIES:FIRE DEPT 001-171'999'5242 004087 LOWE'S HARDWANE SUPPLIES:FINE DEPT 001-171-999-5212 004087 LOWE'S RES INPROV PGM:DIMITRI BARSKI 165-199-813-5804 6 "SIDEWALK ENDS USE C.W."SIGN 001-164-601-5244 10 ,,SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT" SIGNS 001-164-601-5244 20 "KEEP RIGHT" SIGNS 001-164-601-5244 HANDWANE SUPPLIES FOR SIGNS 001-164-601-5244 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 003782 MAIN STNEET SIGNS 003782 MAIN STNEET SIGNS 003782 MAIN STNEET SIGNS 001-161-999-5118 001-163-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 05/11/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 4/23 HCCLANAHAN 05/11/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 4/23 BARTON 05/11/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 4/23 BARTON ITEM AMOUNT 182.10 3,500.75 591.00 45.80 84.00 3,570.00 124.37 237.60 153.96 1,OO0.00 4,700.00 520.00 1,561.05 518.86 4,760.00 40.00 30.00 15.00 82.94 25.21- 16.01 61.52 1OO.OO 33.94 49.66 413.83 184,25 748.86 377.13 154.16 371.52 226.40 226.39 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 182.10 3,500.75 636.80 84.00 3,570.00 124.37 237.60 153,96 4r700.00 520.00 2,079.91 4,760.00 40,00 45.00 318,86 413.83 824.31 ~CHRE2 CITY OF TEMEDULA PAGE 8 ;/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ~CHER/ IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT IMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 62303 05/11/00 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING FACADE IMPROVE PRG: MCLAUGHLIR 280-199-813-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 4,590.00 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 001-2340 3,015.27 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 112.13 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 190-2340 484.28 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE C~MP 003076 DENTALML 193-2340 15.62 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 194-2340 6.48 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-2340 67.27 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALHL 300-2340 22.42 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 340-2340 71.76 62304 05/11/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP COBRA/ROGERS/MAY/DENTAL 001-1180 32.41 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS QTY 2000 EVELOPES FOR B&S 001-162-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 M[NUTEMAN PRESS GTY 2000 LETTERHEAD FOR B&S 001-162-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS FOR PW DEPT 001-165-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 M[NUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-165-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:R.PARKS 001-163-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 M[NUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:AO/CJ/RJ/JH/AB/GA 001-163-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-163-999-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 M[NUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:C.COE 001-164-602-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 M[NUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:B.BURON 001-164-604-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 M[NUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:A.MOGHADAM/T.CHU 001-164-602-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:J.GONZALES 001-164-602-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-164-604-5222 62305 05/11/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-164-602-5222 62306 05/11/00 MORROW. CHRISTOPHER RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 300-199-999-5207 62307 05/11/00 NEW COVENANT FELLOWSHIP REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 62308 05/11/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT APR DISPLAY ADS:VAR DIP UPDTS 001-165-999-5256 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR ECON DEV 001-111-999-5220 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT POWER STRIP #060-358-768 001-170-502-5221 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT POWER STRIP #060-350-835 001-170-502-5221 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT 17" COMPUTER MONITOR 001-170-502-5221 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT 10 PORT COMPUTER BUB 001-170-502-5221 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BP9320 PRINTER #060-358-511 001-170-502-5221 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT SALES TAX 001-170-502-5221 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT EQUIP/SUPPLIES:PD O.T. OFFICE 001-170-502-5242 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT EQUIP/SUPPLIES:PD O.T. OFFICE 001-170-502-5220 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT EQUIP/SUPPLIES:PD O.T. OFFICE 001-170-502-5242 62309 05/11/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT EQUIP/SUPPLIES:PD O.T. OFFICE 001-170-999-5220 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 62310 05/11/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 62310 05/11/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 62310 05/11/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 62311 05/11/00 003}'35 PACIFIC BELL SALES TAX ON 1 CELLULAR PHONE 320-199-999-5242 62312 05/11/00 003253 PACIFIC TECHNICAL SERVI INSTALL MAINT EQUIP:PALOMA PRK 190-180-999-5212 65.22 247.66 382.50 29.64 102.50 229.50 25.73 102.50 102.50 76.50 38.25 7.95 16.83 1,000.00 100.00 472.24 199.46 19.98 79.96 179.99 59.99 399.98 57.34 8,560.83 1~103.69 69.69 429.70 29.19 34.19 256.41 11.55 450.00 CHECK AMOUNT 4,590.00 3,827.64 1,427.28 1,000.00 100.00 472.24 11,160.61 319.79 11.55 450.00 IOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 15/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS IOUCHER/ :HECK CHECK lUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 62313 05/11/00 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-164-601-5238 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-162-999-5238 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-110-999-5238 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-150-999-5250 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-120-999-5238 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/REHTALS 320-199-999-5238 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 190-180-999-5238 PAGENET APR-JUN PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-170-999-5238 70.76 22.86 35.38 35.38 35.38 2.81 450.40 136.50 789.47 62314 05/11/00 PALM DESERT, CITY OF REFUND:LEAGUE CALF MTG:5/08/O0 001'2640 60.00 60.00 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 62315 05/11/00 000246 PERS PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PEHS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 24,396.18 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 698.71 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,630.13 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 277.98 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 81.13 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 300.25 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 78.26 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 688.73 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 147.67 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 584.53 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 167.16 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 87.05 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 17.91 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.25 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .28 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .23 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 1.86 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 001-2090 66.64 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 165-2090 162.36 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 190-2090 45.40 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 280-2090 54.12 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 66.39 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 105.67 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 220.54 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 325.65 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHRET 190-2090 106.18 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 42.20 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 001-2090 84.64 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 001-2090 309.27 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 190-2090 20B.73 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 340-2090 17.52 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 334.65 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 2,235.01- HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UHI 001-2090 90.05 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETHA 001-2090 755.08 32,165.68 )UCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 10 ;/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS )UCHER/ IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR IMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62316 05/11/00 000245 PERS 62317 05/11/00 001958 PERS ITEM DESCRIPTION HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLBHIELD HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 MAXICARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PACCARE HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PACCARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS DED HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CABH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CABH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CABH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CABH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CABH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CABH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEHENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 300-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 194-2090 280-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2122 001-110-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 001-110-999-5220 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 001-140-999-5250 190-181-999-5301 001-110-999-5260 001-120-999-5260 001-162-999-5261 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5320 001-110-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 001-170-999-5220 001-161-999-5260 001-161-999-5260 001-162-999-5220 001-164-604-5260 001-164"602-5262 190-183-999-5370 190-185-999-5301 190-181-999-5301 185.99 419.06 61.99 1,262.47 374.20 701.98 43.09 5t394.61 1#381.39 87.05 36.13 .91 662.30 1,866.40 166.00 3~839.20 742.14 118.59 608.00 3,240.35 2,133.22 138.50 1~492.54 25,711.19 154.60 154.60 19.62 19.62 43.07 43.10 43.10 11.11 2.13 7.63 31.01 50.00 21.27 40.00 7.25 16.10 33.35 17.61 43.48 15.93 12.89 33.52 30.00 4,88 7.80 15,41 27.97 OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 5/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS OUCNER/ HECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR UMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62318 05/11/00 000249 PETTY CASH 62320 05/11/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 62320 05/11/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 62320 05/11/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 62321 05/11/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 62321 05/11/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 62321 05/11/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 62321 05/11/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 62321 05/11/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALiF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCBO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RARCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RARCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62322 05/11/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 62323 05/11/00 001365 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN 62324 05/11/00 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT 62325 05/11/00 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECHN 62325 05/11/00 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECHN 62326 05/11/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF BI 62327 05/11/00 ROOD, CONNIE 62328 05/11/00 002743 62328 05/11/00 002743 62329 05/11/00 003500 62330 05/11/00 000645 62330 05/11/00 000645 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SIMON & SIMON CONSTRUCT SMART & FINAL INC SMART & FINAL INC ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183'999-5320 165'199-999-5220 280-1990 2 PG DISPL AD:EVERY 15 MIN PRG 001-170-999-5371 PUBLIC NOTICE:PAO0-O084 001-161-999-5256 PUBLIC NOTICE:PA97-0274 001~161-999-5256 ADD'L BLUEPRINTS:MAINT FAG 210-190-158-5802 ADDIL BLUEPRINTS:MAINT FAC 210-190-158-5802 SURVEYING EQUIP FOR CIP DIV 001-165-999-5242 SALES TAX 001-165-999-5242 ADDL BLUEPRINTS:I15 S/B OFF RP 210-165-605-5804 APR:O1-99-02003-0:FLT METER 001-164-601-5250 APR:01-O6-26305-0:O.T.FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240 APR:Ol-O6-30205-O:6TN ST 001-164-603-5240 APR:O1-O6-30206-O:6TN ST 001-164-603-5240 APR:01-06-55015-0:O.T.FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240 APR:OI-O6-6OOO5-O:MAIN ST APR:Ol-O6-B4860-5:PUJOL ST APR:Ol-O2-98000-O:STN 84 APR:Ol-O2-98010-O:STN 84 APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS APR:VARIOUB WATER METERS APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS APR:VARIOUS WATER METERS 001-164-603-5240 280-199-807-5801 001-171-999-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT:TEMEKU HIL 190-180-999-5250 APR PYMT FOR K-RAT 001-2300 FEB EMERG RADIO RENTAL:P.D. MAR EMERG. RADIO RENTAL:P.D. 001-170-999-5238 001-170-999-5238 MAR BIKE PATROL SERVICES 001-170-999-5326 REFUND:MUSIC - VIOLIN 190-183-4982 LOCKS/KEYS FOR SATELLITE OFFIC 001-170-502-5219 SALES TAX 001-170-502-5219 RES IMPROVE PRGM: O. CAALIM 165-199-813-5804 SPRING EGG HUNT CANDY & PRIZES 190-183-999-5370 SPRING EGG HUNT CANDY & PRIZES 190-183-999-5370 4.53 4.18 10.47 9.63 1,688.40 22.25 18.75 115.40 65.29 130.00 10.07 321.47 434.97 102.01 56.84 33.95 61.78 9.96 43.11 9.62 203.39 4,178.49 103.51 683.48 186.04 387.97 2,256.67 372.22 57.38 65.00 500.00 205.64 205.64 2,555.27 40.00 302.00 17.67 1,960.00 55.66 410.37 626.66 1,729.40 642.23 9,181.39 65.00 500.00 411.28 2,555.27 40.00 319.67 1,960.00 466.03 rOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 15/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 'OUCHER/ :HECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT lUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62331 05/11/00 SMITH, RAYMOND REFUND:PRJ WITHDRA~N:PA99'0141 001-161-4115 62331 05/11/00 SMITH, RAYMOND REFUND:PRJ WITHDRAWN:PA99-0141 001-163-4115 62331 05/11/00 SMITH, RAYMOND REFUND:PRJ ~ITHDRAgN:PA99-0141 001-161-4129 62331 05/11/00 SMITH, RAYMOND REFUND:PRJ gITHDRAWN:PA99-0141 001-163-4129 62331 05/11/00 SMITH, RAYMOND REFUND:PRJ WITHDRAWN:PA99'0141 001'163'4388 62331 05/11/00 SMITH, RAYMOND REFUND:PRJ WITHDRAWN:PA99-0141 001-171-4036 2,746.00 300.00 598.10 45.00 220.00 351.00 4,260.10 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-17-214-0428:MAY:PKWY TC1 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654:MAY:VAR METERS 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-1353/MAY/PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2-20-302-13Tj:JEFFERSON 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2-20-302-1563:JEFFERSON 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-18-363-1902:MAY:PAUBA RD TC1 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:Z-10-331-2153:TCC 190-184-999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:Z-19-538-2262:VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2'20'792'2444:VARIOUS MTRS 191'180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY:2'20'798'3248:R.C. PED 191'180'999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2-19-683-3255:FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2-19-683-3263:FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY:2-20-965-4912:YNEZ RD 190-180-999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY:2-O2-351-5281:CRC 190-182-999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-15-671-5518:MAY:PALA RD TC1 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-~30:MAY:VAR METERS 192-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7603:MAY:VAR METERS 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-10-901-7962:MAY:YUKON TC1 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2-O2-502-8077:MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2-20-347-8409:MCCABE 190-180-999-5240 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-20-966-8714:MAY:VAN METERS 191-180-999-5319 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-20-817-9929:APR:PD:FRONT ST 001-170-999-5250 62332 05/11/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR:2'18'528'9980:SANTIAGO 191-180-999-5319 150.63 1,800.24 700.78 40.02 245.30 64.58 672.65 92.97 144.89 14.11 286.92 299.15 495.00 3,734.81 129.63 27,631.46 10,355.23 124.25 709.88 756.06 378.85 76.79 154.48 49,058.68 62333 05/11/00 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT:CRC 190-182-999-5250 179.10 179.10 62334 05/11/00 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR TCC PEST CONTROL SERVICES 190-184-999-5250 36.00 36.00 62335 05/11/00 000293 STADIUM PIZZA REFRESHMENTS:KIDS DAY @ ~ORK 001-150-999-5265 160.97 160.97 62336 05/11/00 003828 TANGRAM INTERIORS REPLACEMENT SEATING 190-180-999-5242 62336 05/11/00 003828 TANGRAM INTERIORS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5242 62336 05/11/00 003828 TANGRAM INTERIORS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5242 602.81 50.00 50.59 703.40 62337 05/11/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW 001-164-604-5220 62337 05/11/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR P~ 001-165-999-5220 264.66 52.93 317.59 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 389.50 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 67.65 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.15 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.05 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 20.50 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 20.50 62338 05/11/00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 6.15 512.50 }UCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13 ;/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS )UCHER/ IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM )MBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 62339 05/11/00 003665 TELEGLOBE BUSINESS SOLU MAR LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 320-199-999-5208 1,~9.80 1,739.80 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEMECULA CiTY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 4,115.74 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEHECULA CiTY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165'1020 225.00 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEHECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 1,099.50 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEHECULA CiTY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRiBUTiON TO FLEX 193'1020 114.75 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEHECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 75.00 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 486.66 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 365.00 62340 05/11/00 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 111.25 6,592.90 62341 05/11/00 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 51.67 51.67 62342 05/11/00 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY MGMT RETREAT RECOGN. AWARDS 001-110-999-5250 112.00 62342 05/11/00 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY SALES TAX 001-110-999-5250 8.68 120.68 62343 05/11/00 003545 THINK JACOBSON &ROTH C/O #5 PMT:MUSEUM DESIGN 210-190-808-5804 750.00 750.00 62344 05/11/00 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR MAY CITY HALL ELEV MAINT/SVCS 340-199-701-5212 214.00 214.00 62345 05/11/00 000783 TOMAR ELECTRONICS INC PARTS FOR TEM PD MOTORCYCLES 001-170-999-5214 62345 05/11/00 000783 TOMAR ELECTRONICS iNC FREIGHT 001-170-999-5214 315.00 4.05 319.05 62346 05/11/00 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON REMOVE/STORE O.T. PHONE BOOTH 280-199-999-5362 600.00 600.00 62347 05/11/00 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:LAND DEV 001-163-999-5220 378.54 62347 05/11/00 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW ADMIN 001-164-604-5220 564.67 943.21 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 001-2360 133.50 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 3.01 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360 28.90 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360 2.01 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAHERICA 003560 AD&D 194-2360 .45 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360 1.49 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300-2360 .37 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 3.00 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360 1.50 62348 05/11/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 340-2360 4.27 178.50 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C H/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO 62349 05/11/00 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 8,553.88 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 278.66 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,496.20 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 46.66 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 153.66 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 83.33 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320'2080 666.66 DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 167.04 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 871.38 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 88.06 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 952.50 11,446.09 OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 14 5/11/00 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS OUCHER/ HECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM UMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 62350 05/11/00 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 62351 05/11/00 UFCA MEMBERSHIP UFCA MEMBERSHIP:MIKE NORRIS ACCOUNT NUMBER 193-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 ITEM AMOUNT 23.38 26.48 61.10 38.82 76.28 50.00 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 287.52 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 11.00 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 31.93 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 1.60 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .20 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 3.90 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 300-2120 1.25 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 4.00 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 2.50 62352 05/11/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .60 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 62353 05/11/00 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 000524 VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA 000524 VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA 000524 VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA 000524 VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA 62354 05/11/00 62354 05/11/00 62354 05/11/00 62354 05/11/00 O.T.STREETSCAPE SETTLEMENT AGR O.T.STREETSCAPE SETTLEMENT AGR O.T.STREETSCAPE SETTLEMENT AGR REVERSE STOP NTCS:STLMNT AGRMT REL.STOP NOTICE:OT STREETSCAPE STOP NOTICE:O,T. STREETSCAPE STOP MOTICE:O,T, STREETSCAPE STOP NOTICE:O.T.STREETSCAPB SAFETY VESTS FOR LAND DEVELOP. SAFETY VESTS FOR LAND DEVELOP. SALES TAX SALES TAX FEB PLAN CHECK SERVICES REPAIR MAIN WATER LINE:STN #84 MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CRW MISC SUPPLIES/EQUIP:LAND DEV APR METER USAGE 5765 COPIER APR REPAIR/MAINT OF DC220 APR INTEREST PMT OF DC220 APR LEASE PMT OF DC220 APR LEASE 5021 COPIER AT TCC 62355 05/11/00 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE 62356 05/11/00 004134 WESCO PLUMBING 280-199-824-5804 280-199-824-5804 280-199-824-5804 280-2038 280-2038 280-2038 280-2038 280-2038 001-163-999-5242 001-165-999-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-165-999-5242 001-162-999-5248 001-171-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 001-163-999-5242 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5391 330-2800 190-184-999-5239 62357 05/11/00 002109 WHITE CAP 62357 05/11/00 002109 WHITE CAP 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 62358 05/11/00 62358 05/11/00 62358 05/11/00 62358 05/11/00 62358 05/11/00 90,111.13 90,111.13 129,752.03 163,222.36 20,053.35 20,053.35- 145~697.36- 17~525.00- 59.82 59.81 4.34 4.33 4,430.61 400,00 19.94 472.24 843.59 106.33 55.53 119.87 67.08 CHECK AMOUNT 2,138.00 50.00 344.50 309,974.29 128.30 4,430.61 400.00 492.18 1,192.40 TOTAL CHECKS 684,242.78 ~OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE ~5/11/00 13:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 472m837.11 39,243.00 1,900.00 2E,E53.00 229,425.57 280,685.87 541.00 TOTAL 1,046#885.55 3UCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 ~/11/00 13:01 VCUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 3UCHER/ HECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR JMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 62361 05/23/00 003071 BIDAMERICA 62362 05/23/00 003987 C D E RESOURCES INC 62362 05/23/00 003987 C D E RESOURCES INC 62363 05/23/00 003059 COSTCO WHOLESALE 62364 05/23/00 001714 DREAM ENGINEERING INC 62365 05/23/00 62365 05/23/00 62365 05/23/00 62365 05/23/00 62365 05/23/00 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62366 05/23/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 62367 05/23/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 62367 05/23/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 62368 05/23/00 62368 05/23/00 62368 05/23/00 62368 05/23/00 62368 05/23/00 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING 62369 05/23/00 003935 MELAD & ASSOCIATES 62370 05/23/00 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS 62370 05/23/00 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS ITEM DESCRIPTION SCAN BUILDING PERMITS MAR PRGSS:PUJOL ST SIDEWALK RETENTION:PUJOL ST WALK PW9817 YEAR 7 PAYMENT PER OPA ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS DESIGN TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 MILES TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 MILES TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 MILES TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 CHU,TONY TEMP HELP W/E 04/21GALLARDO APR LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHBORHOOD PK APR LDSCP SVCS: NORTH SLOPES APR LDSGP SVCS: SOUTH SLOPES APR LDSCP SVCS:RANCBO CAL RD APR LDSCP SVCS: SOLANA RIDGE APR LDSCP SVCS: JEFF/WINCH APR LDSCP SVCS:MEDIANS APR LDSCP SVCS:TUSCANY RIDGE APR LDSCP SVCS: MEDIANS APR LDSCP SVCS: SPORTS PARK APR LDSCP SVCS: CRC APR LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER APR LDSCP SVCS: CITY HALL APR LDSCP SVCS: TCC APR LDSCP SVCS: STN 84 APR LDSCP SVCS: 6TH PRKING LOT APR LDSCP SVCS: OLD TWN APR LDSCP SVCS:VIA EDUARDO STR APR LDSCP SVCS: MUSEUM APR LDSCP SVCS:TEMEKU HILL PRK APR PRGSS:PALA ROAD BRIDGE APR CO PRGSS:PALA RD BRIDGE PRINTING RACK BROCHURE PRE-PRESS CHARGE FOR BROCHURE SALES TAX ADDTL WORK FOR RACK BROCHURE PRINTING OVER-RUN FEES APR BLDG INSPECTOR SVCS:PALMER STENCIL PAINT FOR PW TRUCK STENCIL PAINT FOR PW TRUCK ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5250 210-165-826-5804 210-2035 280-199-999-5276 210-190-174-5802 001-163-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-165-999-5118 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-185-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 210-165-631-5804 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 001-162-999-5118 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 8,915.42 44,330.68 4,433.07- 280,685.87 7,250.00 324.53 324.53 324.54 1,667.02 2,426.40 11,529.00 8,878.00 13,375.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 1,250.00 100.00 300.00 21,725.00 1,444.00 361.00 541,00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 106.00 285.00 3,600.00 115,530.00 36,259.76 10,900.00 750.00 58.13 2,200.00 1,312.66 5,760.00 5,435.12 665.70 CHECK AMOUNT 39,897.61 280,685.87 7,250.00 5,067.02 65,574.00 15,220.79 5,760.00 6,100.82 62371 05/23/00 004117 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF'S 4TH QTR RECORD MGMT SYS USAGE 001-170-999-5325 15,562.00 15,562.00 ]UCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 ~/11/00 13:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS )UCHER/ tECK JMBER 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62372 62373 62373 62374 62375 62375 62375 62375 62375 62375 62375 62375 62376 62377 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 05/23/00 ACCOUNT NUMBER 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAW ENFORCEMENT FEB 2000 001-170-999-5288 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5299 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5298 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5294 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5300 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5291 FEB 2000 001-1230 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5281 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5262 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5279 FEB 2000 001-170-999-5297 000271 ROBERT BEIN ~M FROST & MAR PMT#6:I15-79S/I15-SANTIAGO 210-165-662-5802 000271 ROBERT BEIN WM FROST & MAR PMT#6:I15-79S/I15-SANTIAGO 210-165-705-5802 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON PAINT OUTSIDE PSTS/FIXTURES:OT 001-164-603-5250 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO T V MUSEUM STORAGE CABINETS 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO BASE FOR #403 FLAT DRAWER 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO #238 CONSERVATION CABINETS 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO FULL HEIGHT CENTER DIVIDERS 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO HALF WIDTH SHELVES 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO #336-15 CABINETS 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO SHIPPING DELIVERY & INSTALL 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO FULL WIDTH SHELVES 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 210-190-808-5804 003T30 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING MAINT 001-164-601-5402 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES IND FEB DESIGN SVCS:PALA RD IMPRV 210-165-668-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 184,906.83 39,359.84 38,912.00 10,026.88 19,456.00 15,801.60 5,267.20 26,397.55 22,249.58 6,018.18 14,934.40 4,776.29 1,766.57 24,980.00 2,058.34 105.00 8,235.30 840.00 384.00 2,434.70 3,600.00 1,032.00 6,264.00 5,256.00 CHECK AMOUNT 383,330.06 6,542.86 24,980.00 18,689.34 6,264.00 5,256.00 TOTAL CHECKS 1,046,885.55 ITEM 3 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City CounciUCity Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official//~- May 23,2000 Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve an additional expenditure in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for Plan Check Services with Esgil Corporation. 2. Approve an additional expenditure in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for Plan Check Services with VanDorpe Chou and Associates. DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Depadment has experienced a continued increase in plan review activity over the past several years. To be responsive to this increased plan review workload, the services of Esgil Corporation and VanDorpe Chou and Associates has been utilized. Due to the nature of the building industry, its activity fluctuations and the rapid growth the City is experiencing, accurate estimation of fiscal year plan review activity is difficult. Over the past several years, requests have been made to Council for additional appropriation of funds for plan review services, beyond that approved in the department's operating budget The current contracts with Esgil Corp and VanDorpe Chou and Associates, do not expire until the year 2001. In July of 1999 the City Council approved expenditures to Esgil Corporation and VanDorpe Chou and Associates in amounts of $75,000 each. This action approves the additional expenditures of $20,000 for each of these firms for this fiscal year. By having these firms provide plan review services, the community receives more effective plan reviews resulting in effective customer service. Additionally, the in-house plan checker position has been vacant for the past several months. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Account Number 001-162-999-5248, "Consulting Services". F: \DEpTS\BLDGSAFE\BROCKMEI\AGENDA \ESGILVANOO.DOC 1 5/17/00 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE~.__ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Peter Thorson, City Attorney May 23, 2000 Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. DISCUSSION: On October 7, 1997, the City of Temecula became the governing entity for Community Facilities District No. 88-12 ("CFD 88-12") which was originally established in 1988 by the County of Riverside for certain improvements on Ynez Road. Bonds were issued by CFD-12 in 1992 in order to fund the improvements. In June 1998 these bonds were refunded, and new bonds were issued in their place. These bonds are repaid through parceled special taxes. Such taxes are collected in hi-annual installments and are placed on the County's tax roll rather than being hand-billed. ~TEMEC FSIOILVOLI~DEPTSIFINANCE~NORrONL]AGENDAS~CFDFu,eclt~se52320OOdoc 05/16/00 As a result of property owner's failure to pay the special taxes, the properties with the following parcel numbers within CFD No. 88-12 are currently delinquent: 944-330-001-0 944-330 003-2 944-330-017-5 944-330-004-3 944-330-005*4 944-330-007-6 921-730-004-2 921-730-005-3 921-730-006-4 921-730-007-5 921-730-008*6 921-730-009-7 921-730-010-7 921-730-011-8 921-730-012-9 921-730-013-0 921-730-014-1 921-730-015-2 As of May, 2000, the delinquencies on these parcels exceeded $87,512.11 As the governing body of CFD 88-12, the City of Temecula is obligated to foreclose upon the delinquent parcels pursuant to its responsibilities under the bond indentures. In order for the City to proceed with its foreclosure action, it must first seek to "strip" the existing delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. In order to achieve this, the City Council must adopt a resolution which strips the delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. Subsequently, the City must file a Notice of Stripping, which effectively relieves the County Tax Collector from further responsibility in the collection and/or foreclosure upon the delinquent parcels. The goal of the actions is to obtain payment of the special taxes due along with interest, penalties and costs of collection. The property owner will be given every opportunity to pay the amounts due, but the City must formally proceed with the foreclosure actions. FISCAL IMPACT: The delinquencies on these parcels exceed $87,512.11 and will be used to satisfy the debt service requirement on the outstanding bonds. Attachments: Resolution No. 2000- Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2000- LITEMEC FSlOI~VOL IIDEPTSIFINANCELNORTONL~AGENDASICFDFuteclose5232000withoutDEC doc 05, 16/00 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare as follows: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and A. The County of Riverside, California, did previously undedake proceedings to and did establish a community facilities district pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (hereinafter "Mello-Roos Act"), as codified, Government Code section 53311, et seq.; and B. The County of Riverside did previously issue special tax bonds pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Mello-Roos Act to finance public improvements; and C. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, the timely collection of the special tax installments are necessary for the timely payment of all principal and interest on the special tax bond and each special tax levy thereof and interest and penalties thereon constitute liens against the lots and parcels of land against which they are made, until the same are paid; and D. Certain special taxes have not been paid when due, and certain special taxes may not be paid in the future; and E The County of Riverside has covenanted with the owners of the special tax bonds to commence and diligently pursue foreclosure actions against those parcels of land subject to the delinquent payment of special taxes; and F The City of Temecula, as successor-in-interest to the County of Riverside, desires to assume the duty of the County of Riverside Tax Collector in collecting upon the existing delinquencies in Community Facilities District No 88-12; and G. Under the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the California Government Code, the City Council is authorized, at any time prior to the expiration of four years subsequent to the last maturity of the principal of bonds secured by assessment or reassessment, to order the same to be collected by an action brought in the Superior Court to foreclose the liens of the delinquent special taxes; and LITEMEC FS1011VOL11DEPTS[FINANCE~NORTONL~AGENDAS[CFDFotec/ose5272000w~thoutDEC doc 05/16/00 H. Under the provisions of Section 53356.2 of the California Government Code, when such foreclosure actions are ordered, the county tax collector is to be credited upon the current tax roll with the amount charged against the tax collector on account of the delinquent special taxes to be sued on and to be relieved of further duty in regard thereto and a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll is to be recorded with the county recorder's office in the county in which the real property is located. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby orders that the delinquent payments of special taxes for CFD 88-12 with respect to those parcels identified on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and all subsequent delinquent special taxes with respect to those parcels which are not paid when due, be collected by action brought in the Superior Court of Riverside to foreclose the liens thereof. Section 3. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute such actions in the name of the City to foreclose the liens of all such delinquent special taxes. Section 4. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and cause to be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll. Section 5. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conduction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Auditor/ Controller's office of the County of Riverside together with such other documents and the payment of such fees as is necessary or appropriate to credit the County of Riverside Tax Collector upon the tax roll with the amounts charged against the Tax Collector on account of the delinquent special tax installments to be sued upon and to relieve the Tax Collector of further duty in regards thereto. Section 6. The City Manager, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to take such further actions as may be necessary or convenient to recover the special taxes due from the properties and to prosecute the foreclosure actions. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. HTEMEC FS10I]VOLI~DEPTSIFINANCEINORTONLIAGENDAS~CFDFozeclose5232000withou~DEC doc 05/16/00 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on May 23, 2000. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk LITEMEC FSlOl~VOLIIDEPTSIFINANCE~NORTONL~AGENDASICFDForeclose5232000withoutDEC doc 05/16/00 EXHIBIT A City of Temecula Community Facilities Districts CFD No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Assessor's Parcel No. RANCHO CAL HIGHLANDS II 944-330-001-0 944-330-003-2 944-330=017-5 RANCHO CAL HIGHLANDS I 944-330-004-3 944-330-005-4 944-330-007-6 NORTH PLAZA 921~730-004-2 921-730-005-3 921-730-006 4 921-730-007 5 921-730-008-6 921-730-009-7 921-730-010-7 921-730 011-8 921-730-012-9 921-730-013-0 921 730-014-1 921-730-015-2 Installment Delinquent April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 April 10, 2000 Amount 9,632.72 5,378.48 11,893.98 5,991.71 5,825.62 4,049.83 3,308.85 5,748.97 13,082.10 2,337.92 1,264.78 1,175.35 2,146.28 2,120.73 1,443.63 1,584.16 1,635.26 8,891.74 HTEMEC FSIOl~VOLl~DEPTSIFINANCELNORfONL~AGENDASICFDFOtec/oSe5232000w~rhOUtDEC dOC 05/16/00 ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official -"'~ May 23, 2000 Street Name Change from Calle Patron to Roick Dr. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: That the City Council: RESOLUTION NO. 00-__ "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP 28471-F FROM CALLE PATRON TO ROICK DR." DISCUSSION: The Developer of the Westside Business Center, along with the property owners of Calle Patron, have requested a street name change from Calle Patron to Roick Dr. FISCAL IMPACT: None F: \DEPTS\BLDGSAFE\BROCKMEI\AGENDA\ROICK DR,DOC ] 5/11/00 RESOLUTION NO. 00-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP NO. 28471-F FROM CALLE PATRON TO ROICK DRIVE The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, Section 34091.1 and 34092 of the Government Code provides for changing the name of a public street, and: WHEREAS, the developer of Parcel Map No. 28471-F has requested a name change from Calle Patron to Roick Drive; WHEREAS, there are no other affected property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula determines and orders that the name of Calle Patron be changed to Roick Drive. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23~day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 00-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd Day of May, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk ITEM 6 APPROVA~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Herman Parker, Director of Community Service~ May 23, 2000 SB 332 Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Abatement Funding Request PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse. Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB-332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER ABATEMENT GRANT FOR FY 199912000 DISCUSSION: Senate Bill 332 provides for per capita grant funding to Califomia cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter abatement programs. The City of Temecula's eligible funding amount from SB 332 for FY 2000/01 is $14,279. The grant requires a Resolution adopted by the City Council and an application stating the City's intended use for the funds with the associated costs. The application packet is due to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling by May 31, 2000. Staff has identified three programs that are eligible for the SB 332 funding. Staff proposes the installation of eleven beverage recycling receptacles at several high-activity City park sites and recreational facilities. The receptacles are designed with a lid that allows the deposit of aluminum, glass and plastic beverage containers while discouraging the disposal of other waste. The container lid indicates it is for beverage containers only and the receptacle bears the recycling logo. The estimated cost for this program is $5,500. The second recommended program is the "Extrame Recycling" program sponsored by the City and CR&R, the City's franchised waste hauler. Last year was the first year this program was implemented and it proved very successful, The program provides for the haulers racycling drivers to nominate families and businesses on their routes that do a consistently outstanding job of recycling. R:'~RUSEP~AGENDAS~Sb 332 funding 1999-2000.doc The award recipients are recognized at a City Council meeting and given a gift basket of items to either continue recycling efforts or made of recycled materials. The estimated cost for this program is $3,779. The final component of the grant application is a $5,000 contribution to Western Riverside Council of Govemments (WRCOG) for their proposed "Cleanest County in the West" program. This is a litter abatement campaign aimed to help deter littering in the participating Cities. Most if not all of the fifteen WRCOG members are designating some or all of their SB 332 allocation to this program. FISCAL IMPACT: Receipt of this grant funding will provide $9,279 for City-specific programs aimed at recycling and litter abatement. It will also provide an additional $5,000 to augment the WRCOG litter abatement campaign on a more regional level. R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS~sb 332 funding 1999-2000.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB-332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER ABATEMENT GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 199912000 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and a. The people of the State of California have enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Ac that provides funds to cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities. b. The California Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures for cities and counties or their designees under the program. c. Pursuant to Section 14581(a)(4)A) of the California beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form by the due date and time in order to request funds from the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. Section 2. That the City of Temecula authorizes the submittal of the Funding Request Form to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. The City Manager is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Temecula all necessary forms hereto for the purposes of secudng payments and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the Section 14581(a)(4)A) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act and provide information regarding this program to the Division upon request. Section 3. Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Temecula this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of __ day of ,2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,2000 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: F:\Dept~\CSD',RUS~OS\SB 332 fundlg 1999-20(30.doc ITEM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL E~' CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 2000 Parcel Map No. 26845-1, Finding Of Conformance With Its Odginal Approval, Located North East Corner of Santiago Road and Ynez Road PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 26845-1 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 26845, subdivision of a four (4) parcel single family residential parcel map on 3.68 acres, was approved in September 1991. On March 1, 1999, the City of Temecula Planning Director approved a phasing map dividing the subdivision into two phases. The tentative parcel map had four one year extensions of time, expiration date being September 11, 2000. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This parcel map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. Parcel Map No. 26845-1 is a three (3) parcel single family residential subdivision on 2.12 acres. The parcel is located at the north east corner of Santiago Road and Ynez Road. The site is currently vacant. The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 26845-1: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 26845-1 1 r:%agdrpt%2000\0523~pm26845-1 .map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PM 26845-1 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee Area Drainage Plan Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of building permit To be paid prior to issuance of grading permit 2 r:%agdrpt%2000\0523~pm26845-1 +map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 26845-1 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage $ Water $ Sewer $ TOTAL $ Monument $ FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY 61,000.00 9,000.00 0.00 70,000.00 0.00 DATE: May 23, 2000 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY $ $ $ $ 30,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 35,000.00 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due 'To Be Determined $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00 *TBD *TBD 57.00 4.00 2,235.00 250.00 2,546.00 0.00 3 r:~agdrpfi2000~O523~om26845-1 .map Ranch° Temecule Santiago California ~sta poubo Rde Road VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ITEM 8 APPROVAL E_~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City ManagedCity Council /'H~.~(William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 24187-1, Finding of Conformance With its Odginal Approval, located South and West of Sunny Meadows Drive, East of Meadows Parkway, and North of De Portola Road in the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219 PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ::31ement M. Jimenez, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 24187-1 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 24187-1 is located within Planning Area 23 of the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219. As part of Specific Plan No. 219, Tract Map No. 24187-1 is subject to all Specific Plan Amendments and Agreements. The Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan has been amended six times. Amendment No. 6, the most recent amendment, was approved by City Council on January 13, 1998. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24187 was originally approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on December 8, 1992. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24187, Amendment No. 3, First Extension of Time, was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on September 15, 1999, expiration date being September 15, 2001. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. Final Tract Map No. 24187-1 is an eighty-seven (87) lot single family residential subdivision with two open space lots and one private drainage lot. The tract is located south and west of Sunny Meadows Drive, east of Meadows Parkway, and north of De Portola Road all within Planning Area 23 of the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219. The site is currently vacant. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 24187-1: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Fee Checklist 2. Fees & Securities Report 3. Project Vicinity Map 4. Tract Map No. 24187-1 r:~agdrpt~2000\O523~tr24187-1 .map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TM 24187-1 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit 2 r:~agdrpt%2000\O523\tr24187-1 .map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 24187-1 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage $ Water $ Sewer $ TOTAL $ Monument $ FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY 656,500 188,000 187,000 1,031,500 22,000 DATE: May 23, 2000 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY 328,250 94,000 93,500 515,750 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00 N/A *TBD 188.00 8.00 2,490.00 1,100.00 3,786.00 0.00 3 r:~agdrpt~2000\0523\tr24187-1 ,map ~5 TRACT NO. 24187-! TRACT NO. 24/87- ! BOUNDARY AND INDEX UAP TRACT NO. 24 187- l 2 .Z 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 5 6 9 I0 11 86 85 84 ~Or "~" .2: 75 74 75 76 7/ 72 71 6O TRA C T NO. 24187-1 82 81 85 80 /~ ROSADO COURT -r~' '~' LOT "D "~ 62 L~ 6,~ - 65 77 ~ 78 79 .... 'J"'~ ..... "h COMMON 58 OPEN SPACE ~ LOT 88 SEE SHEET 7 TRACT NO. 24 187-1 ? 2p GRAPHIC SCALE SEE SHEET 4 41 ,::-::::::'~~" TRA C T N 0. 2 4 ! 8 7- ! GRAPHIC SCALE :L :, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES REVISIONS ITEM 9 APPROVAI~C~_ CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 2000 Pala Road Bridge, Project No. PW97-15 California Highway Patrol Agreement PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the CHP Agreement Number 0305-99/00 for an amount not to exceed $9,747.04, for providing Traffic Control Services during the Rainbow Canyon Road Closure/Detour and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: On February 9, 1999 the City Council awarded a construction contract to Granite Construction for the completion of the Pala Road Bridge Replacement Project. The City has also issued contract change orders forthe enhancement and acceleration of the Rainbow Canyon Road Detour/Closure. Additional specialized signs and advance-warning devices were deployed during the time frame the detour was in place. The closure and detour route duration was reduced from the originally scheduled 6 months to 3 weeks. During the morning and evening commute hours, the California Highway Patrol was utilized to direct traffic on SR-79 while the closure/detour was in effect. To expedite the CHP's response to the City's request for services, a letter of intent was issued by the City Manager authorizing the work, which would be reimbursed by the City. Although the City Manager is authorized to execute contracts that are less than $25,000.00, State regulations require that CHP agreements be approved by a City Council action. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is primarily funded with Capital Project Reserves and Federal Highway Administration/BIA funds. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 210-165-631-5804. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Intent 2. CHP Cover Letter 3. CHP Agreement R:~AGDRPT\2OO0/0523/PW97-15CHP.DOC 6444 · Fax (909) 694-1999 P 0 Box 9033., Temecula, CA 92589~9033 February 16, 2000 Deparunent of California Highway Patrol G.E. Towle, Captain 27685 Commerce Center Drive Temeenia, CA 92591 Atm: Sgt. Mark Hodges Re: Pala Road Street and Bridge Improvements, Project No. PW97-15 Traffic Control Services Letter of Agreement Dear Captain Towle: The City is receipt of your letler dated February 16, 2000 regarding the Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP) providing traffic control services within the State Route 79/Pala Road construction zone beginning on or about February 23, 2000. The exact commencement date of the needed traffic control officer(s) will be determined by the closure of old Pala road, which is dependent upon completion of new Pala Road. Currently we are experiencing weather related delays. Our project manager, Greg Butler, will coordinate with CHP. The City is agreeable to the estimated expenses detailed in your letter. Please proceed with the preparation of the agreement. If you have any questions or need additional informalion please contact Greg Buffer, Senior Engineer at (909) 694-6411.. Sincerely, I M er Shawn D. Ne son, City anag cc: William G. Hughes, PE, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Greg Buffer, Senior Engineer ~ File 5.6 State of California--Business, Transportation and Housing Agency DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL P. O. Box 942898 Sacramento, CA 94298-0001 (9'16) 3754965 (800) 735-2929 (TTrrDD) (800) 735-2922 (Voice) April 26, 2000 File No.: 76.A08399 GRAY DAVIS, Governor Mr. Greg Butler City of Temecula P. O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA. 92589-9033 CHP AGREEMENT NUMBER 0305-99/00 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES Please have the individual who is authorized to enter into agreements on behalf of the City of Temecula sign all five (5) copies of the enclosed contract. In addition, please submit a copy of either an approved resolution or City Council Meeting Minutes authorizing the execution of this agreement and amendments and indicating who is authorized to sign the agreements. Return the resolution or document along with all five (5) originals to: Dept. of California Highway Patrol Business Services Section Attn.: Contract Management Unit P. O. Box 942898 Sacramento, CA 94298-0001 Once the agreement has been approved by the State. an original will be returned to you. Should you have any questions regarding the agreement. you may contact the Contract Management Unit. telephone O16) 375-2965. CONTRACT X IANAGEMENT UNIT Business Sen'ices Section Enclosures cc: 685 - Tcmecula Area Attn.: Sgt. M. }lodges RECEIVED CiTY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT CHP #0305-99 00 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 23rd day of February, 2000, by and between the State of California acting by and through the Department of California Highway Patrol, hereinafter called CHP, and City of Temecula, hereinafter called CITY. WITNESSETH: By and in consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained. CITY and CHP do hereby agree as follows: 1. The CHP agrees to provide to the CITY traffic control services to alleviate traffic congestion at the intersection located inside the construction zone on SR 79 in the area of Pala Road. 2. CHP agrees to provide services between February 23, 2000 through March 17. 2000. 3. At the request of CITY. CHP Temecula Area Office will provide traffic officers with vehicles and coordinate all traffic control. 4. The Contract Coordinators for this agreement shall be: CHP Temecula Area Office Attn.: Sergeant Aaron Martinez 27685 Commerce Center Drive Temecula, CA. 92591 Telephone no.: (909) 506-2000 City of Temecula Attn.: Mr. Greg Butler. Sr. Engineer P. O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA. 92589-9033 Telephone no.: (90% 694-6411 5. The hours of duty pertbrmed by CHP officers under this agreement are tbr t~vo shifts of 4 hours each, one in the morning and one in the aPtemoon to facilitate the flow of traffic at the intersection. Any changes to the proposed plan such as additional hours, dates. and sites tbr traffic control can be requested and/or on an "as needed" basis and must be mutually agreed upon by the local CHP command and CITY. 6. The law enforcement services to be performed by CttP officers under this agreement. including the standards of pertbrmance. discipline and control thereof shall be the responsibility of the CHP. 7. The CHP and CITY agree that in the event of an unlbreseen emergency, this agreement may be terminated by either pan3' without prior notice to the other party. City of Temecula CHP #0305-99/00 February 23. 2000 Page 2 of 4 8. Should CHP officer(s) report to the assigned detail location and if for any reason CHP reassigns the officer(s) away from the detail, CITY will be billed only for the officer(s) actual time incurred from CHP Area Office to the service location and for the time spent at the assigned detail location covered under this agreement. 9. The CHP and CITY agree that this agreement may be amended by xwitlen mutual consent of both parties hereto. 10. In consideration of the above sen, ices and upon receipt of an itemized invoice, the CITY agrees to reimburse the CHP the actual costs in effect at the time services are provided. The following information is a cost estimate only: CLASSIFICATION OVERTIME RATE PER HOUR Sergeant $59.97 Sergeant M/C $61.68 Officer $49.24 Officer M/C $50.91 Mileage for Patrol Vehicles $.32 per mile The total amount of the agreement shall not exceed Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-seven Dollars and 04/100 ($9,747.04). 11. It is understood by CITY that billing of CHP officer's time will be from portal to portal (CHP Area Office to the service location and return to CHP Area Office) except as specified in Paragraph 8. 12. Untbreseen events may require CHP personnel to expend hours in excess of the original estimate.. 13. The CHP shall provide CITY x~ ith an itemized invoice which details all of CHP's employee costs for the traffic control services performed under this agreement. The CITY agrees to pay CHP within thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice. Cit) of Temecula CHP =0305-99/00 FebmaD 23. 2000 Page 3 of 4 14. OTHER REQUIREMENTS a. lfthe CHP uniformed employee has reported to the assigned location and has worked less than tbur (4) hours, CITY agrees to pay every assigned uniformed employee a minimum of four (4) hours overtime. Exception: This does not apply to those cases when the hours worked are part of an extended shift. 15. CANCELLATIONS a. CITY will not be charged for cancellations made more than 24 hours prior to the scheduled assignment. b. CITY agrees that if cancellation is made within 24 hours prior to the scheduled assignment and the assigned CHP uniformed employee(s) cannot be notified of such cancellation. a minimum of Ibur (4) hours overtime will be charged for each assigned uniformed employee. c. CITY agrees that if cancellation is made within 24 hours prior to the scheduled assignment and the CHP employee is notified of such cancellation, CITY will only be charged a short notice cancellation fee of $50.00 per assigned CHP uniformed employee. 16. All cancellation notices to CHP must be made during normal CHP business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. 17. CHP agrees to make reasonable eflbrts to notify those CHP uniformed employees of the cancellation. 18. Except as provided in Paragraph 19, CITY agrees that additional charges may be assessed for CHP supplies, additional equipment utilized. damage to property repaired or replaced at State expense. etc.. which are directly related to the services provided herein. 19. No additional gifts, donations, or gratuities may be accepted by the CHP employees in their own behalf or in behalf of the Department. informal squad club, or other local funds. City of Temecula CHP u0305-99/00 FebruaD'23.2000 Page 4 of 4 20. Each party shall be responsible for the negligence or misconduct of its own personnel. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Dept. of California Highway Patrol CITY OF TEMECULA Admin. Services Officer Signature Title Date Date Dept. Of California Highway Patrol Business Services Section Attn.: Contract Management Unit P. O. Box 942898 Sacramento. CA 94298-0001 City of Temecula P. O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA. 92589-9033 Authority: City Council Resolution or dated Minute Order Attached ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council APPROVAN~~ CITY A'FFORNEY r~^William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 2000 Completion and Acceptance for the 1-15 Southbound Auxiliary Lane at Winchester Road, Project No. PW98-07 PREPARED BY: Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the project for the 1~15 Southbound Auxiliary Lane at Winchester Road, Project No. PW98-07, as complete; and File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On August 24, 1999, the City Council awarded the contract to E. L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc. for an amount of $544,329.40. Five contract change orders for an amount of $32,923.45 was approved by the City Manager. Also, there were some increases and decreases in quantity extension costs totaling amount of -$68,310.48. This brings the total cost of the project to $508,942.37. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: The total bid amount for this project was $544,329.40. Contract change order nos. 1 through 5 were approved in the amount of $32,923.45. With some quantity extension costs of -$68,310.48, bringing the total cost of the project to $508,942.37. This project is funded through Redevelopment Agency and Capital Project Reserves funds. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-165-697-5804. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit ] R:/AGDRPT/2000/OS23/PW98-07 .ACC,DOC RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92S89-9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to E.L. Yeager Construction Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: I-15 Southbound Auxiliary Lane at Winchester Road, Project No. PW98-07 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on May 23, 2000. That upon said contract the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW98-07. 6. The street address of said property is: I-15 Freeway and Winchester Road. Dated at Temecula, California, this 23'~ day of May, 2000. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 23'd day of May, 2000. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND BOND NO: 40-0120-38423-99-9-M PROJECT PW98-07 I-f5 SOUTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE AT WINCHESTER RD -KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT: E.L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., P.O. BOX 87, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S a CORPORATION hereina~er (~fll in whether a Corporal/on, Partnership or individual) UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CCMPANY 500 S. KRAEMER BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, BREA, CA 92821 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY called Principal, and hereinafter called SURETY, are held and ~rmty bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, heroinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of FIF'i~Z FOUR 'I~OUSAND FOU~ BUI'~RPj:) THIRTY ~v~O DOLLARS and 94/100 .... CENTS ($ 54,432.94 .... ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 24TH day of AUGUST ,19 ~ a copy 'of which is herato attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT PW98-'07, 1- 15 SOUTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE AT WINCHESTER RD. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the pedod of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and the final estimate was approved on ,19__. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective 'materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by MAINTENANCE EK:)ND M-1 R:~BID-DOCS~ASTERS~NEWBID the City of Temecula successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be pe~ormed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of tjme, alteration. or addition to the the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 8TH day of MAY ,1~ 2000 (Seal) UNITED STATES FID LITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY E.L. GER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. jO~q M~ Douj~ (Name (Name) ' AT~D~qE~/-IN-FACT Vice President g'itle) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ('F~le) Secretary/Treasurer (TRle) MAINTENANCE BOND M-2 R:~ID-DOCS~ViASTERS~EWBID CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of California County of Riverside On May 9, 2000 personally appeared [] personally known to me before me, Patricia Macias , Notary Public, Douglas J. Aadland and Jeffi'ey A. Tinsley - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons(s) whose name(s) ~s/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ~c./s~e./they executed the same in his/h~/their authorized eapacity(ies), and that by ~i;~/thdr signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signatun of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not reqmred by law, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Docment Title or Type of Document: Document Date: May 8, 2000 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Maintenance Bond Number of Pages: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Douglas J. Aadland [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): Vice President [] Partner- [] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator Signer's Name: Jeffrey A. TinsIcy [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): Secretary/Treasurer [] Parmet- [] Limited [] General [] Attorne,v-in-Fact [] Other: __ov~v~ Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing: E. L. YeaRer Const. Co,, Inc. E.L. Yeaget Const. Co_ Inc. State of California County of Orange NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT On May 8.2000 (Date) personally appeared before me, J.K. Curmin~ham (NameTfitle - Notary Public) John M. Garrett Notary [] personally known to me - OR - [] J. K. CUNNINGHAM COMM. ~1113192 ~ NO1AHY pUBLIC-CAUFORNIA ~ ~; ORANGE COUNTY r~ ~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT. 6, 2000 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) OPTIONAL INFOR~MATION [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE [] OFFICER(S) (Title) [] PARTNERS(S) LIMITED GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: TheSTPaUI POWER OF ATTORNEY Lnited States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelit> and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidebt) and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc. Power of Attorney No. 2 ] 246 Certificate No. KNO~.V ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York. and thal Paul Fire and Manne Insurance Cornpan; St Paul GuardPro Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercu~- [n,urance Company are corporations duly organized under la%~ · ot the State ot Minnesota. and that L rated Slates Fidelity and Guaranty Company N a corporation dub organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. and Ihat Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance C,mpan? N ;t ¢orporatit}n duly organized under the law~ nl the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance /rnderx~ rilers. Inc. mNa corporation dub urgamzed under Ihe laws of the State ill Wisconsin therein Itdlelnl eiv ¢alled the 'CI,npanies "i. and that the Companies do John M. Garrett. Steven C. Mosier. Judith K. Cunningham, Tern L. Vaughan, Denise Bennett, Erika Nicholas and Geraldine R. McEwen tit the City ol Tllstirl . State California . their true and lawful Attomey(sHn-Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than line is nanled above. to sign its name as surety to. and to execute. qeal and acknowledge any and all bonds, unclefurl<lugs. contracls and other ~ntlcn instrumenls in the nature thereof nn behalf at the Companies in their busines~ tit guaranteeing the fidelity uf persons, guaranteelug the peribrmance of contracts and executing or guaranteelug hnnds and undertakings required or permitted in an> actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Compame~ ha~e caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this 1 St day of December 1999 Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelit,~ and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelit> and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. ~'~ JOHN F PHINNEY. V?ce Pre~dent MICHAEL R MCKIBBEN. A~sistanl Secretar', t)n thi· l gt day at December 1999 . betore me. the undcNgned officer, personally appeared John E Phinne} and Mlchad R. McKibben. who acknowledged themselves ttl be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary. respectively. of Seaboard Surety Company. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insulance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Colnpally. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Campan>. tinted States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelit> and ~aid (',,nlpanlcs; and that they. as such. hcln~ authorized stl Io do. cxecumd the ibregomg inslrumcnt lilr the purposes therein ctmtamed by signing the name~ of the 86203 Rev 11-99 Printed in U S A rett/Mosier Insurance Services, Inc. 7291 Irvine Blvd., Ste .104 Tustin, CA 92780 714-508-1450 800414-7583 I'ax 714-508-1455 CA License # OB84519 May 8, 2000 Mr. Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Contractor: Project: E.L. Yeaget Construction Company, Inc. I-15 Southbound Auxiliary Lane @ Winchester Road Project No. PW98-07 United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Bond No. 40-0120-38423 -99-9 Dear Mr. Harvey: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company hereby consents to the Release of Retention in the amount of FIFTY THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY THREE AND 47/100 DOLLARS ($50,773.47). Said Principal has requested CITY OF TEMECULA to pay the retention due under said contract. Very truly yours, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY By: Attorney-in-Fact cc: E.L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc. cc: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company State of California County of Orange NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT On MAY 8, 2000 (Date) personally appeared before me, Terri L. Vau~han-Pirtle (Name'Title - Notary Public) Judith K. Curmin~ham Notary [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/tkcy executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/-th~ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) OPTIONAL INFORMATION [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE [] OFFICER(S) (Title) [] PARTNERS(S) LIMITED GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: 'lheBrpaui I:'OWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. PaulGuardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guarant3 tA~mpany Fidelity- and Guaranty Insurance Clampany Fidelity, and Guaranty Insurance [ nder,~ rilers. lnc. Power of Attorne~ No. 2 ] 246 Certificate No. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Scabnard Surety Company ~s ;l crlrporadon duly organized under the laws ill the State elf New York. and that SI. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Conlpany, St, Paul Guardian Insurance Compan} and St Paul Mercury Insurance Crimpany are corporanuns duly organized under lhe laws of the State td Minnesota. and Ihat United States Fidelity and Guaranty Curepan} is a corporation duly organized under the laws or the State of Maryland. and that Fidelity and Guaranty insurance Company i, a coq~oration duly organized under lhe laws of the State of Iowa. and that Fidelit} ~md Guaramv Insurance John M. Garrett, Steven C. MosieL Judith K. Curmmgham, Tern L. Vaughan, Denise Bennett, Erika Nicholas and Geraldine R. McEwen ~,t the City uf TtlSIlll , State California , their true and la~ lul Attomey(s)-in-FacL each in their separate capacity II more than one is named above. lu ~lgn its name as ~urcty to. and to execute. seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings. ,,intracts and other writIon instruments m lhe mlture therenf un behalt ill the Companies in their busines~ ol guaranteeing the fidelity ol persons. guaranteeing the pcrlbrmance uf contracts and executing or guaranteerag bnnds and undertakings reqmred nr permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed b) law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument m be signed and sealed this 1St day of December 1999. Seaboard SURly Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul I,;uardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Coml~ny United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelit)' and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelit)' and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, lnc JOHN F PHINNEY, Vice President ~)n this 1 st _ d.,} ,d December 1999 , hellire me, the underqlgned officer, personally appeared John E Phinney and Michael R McKibben. x~hll acknm~iedged themselves Ill be the Vice President and A~slhtant Secretary. respectively. ot Seaboard Surety C,mpany. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St Pciul Guardian Insurance Conlpanv, St Paul Mercur} Insurance Conlpany, Unded States Fidelity and (;uaranl> Company. Fidelity and 86203 Rev 11-99 Pnnted rn US A E. L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ~NC. CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT P W98-07 1-15 SOUTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE AT WINCHESTER ROAD This is to ceni~' that E.L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath. that he/sh~it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor. services. tools, equipment, and all other hills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents. employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT PW98-07, 1- 15 SOUTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE AT WINCHESTER ROAD, situated in the City of Temecula, State of Califomia~ more particularly described as follows: 1-15 SOUTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE AT WINCHESTER ROAD The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount in Dispute N/A N/A Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts. demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. E.L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Dated: Sign Johnathon Sim. Project Engineer R-I TELEI~HONE: (9091 684-5360 FAX: (909) 684-1644 UCENBE NUMBER: 140069 MAIUNQ ADDRESS: PD. BOX 87. RIVERSIDE. CAUFORNIA 92502 SHIPPINQ ADDRESEt: 1995 AGUA MANSA RD.. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92509 ITEM 11 APPROVAL ;_~""~ CItY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANC CItY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council 3t~A/Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 2000 TEA-21 Grant Application - Pala Road Street and Drainage Improvements PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Receive and file this report regarding our Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) Grant Application for Pala Road Street and Drainage Improvements and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to Caltrans for submittal to the U.S. Department of Transportation. 2. Approve a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALTRANS APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR PUBLIC LANDS/HIGHWAYS DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR PALA ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVMENTS BACKGROUND: The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) continued the Public Lands Highway (PLH) Discretionary Program, making approximately $70 million in federal funds available for allocation to qualified State transportation projects in Fiscal Year 2001. The intent of the program is to improve access to and within the Federal lands of the nation. A "public lands highway" means a road under the jurisdiction of and maintained by a public authority and open to public travel or any highway through unappropriated or unreserved public lands, nontaxable Indian lands, or other Federal reservations. These funds are highly competitive on a nationwide basis. Individual jurisdictions must forward their project applications to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) no later than May 26, 2000. Caltrans will then forward all viable candidate projects throughout California to the U.S. Department of Transportation for final project selection. All awarded PLH funds must be obligated by September 15, 2001. R:~agdrpt\00\0523\TEA-21grantsupport The Public Works Department has prepared a grant application request that we believe meets the goals of PLH funding program. Our proposed project seeks $4 million in PLH funds to widen a 2.7-mile portion of Pala Road from the newly constructed Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga Road. Although the Pala Road Bridge has been improved to accommodate 6 lanes of traffic, the southerly extension of Pala Road from this point consists of a two-lane roadway, which is incapable of accommodating the level of traffic generated from the Pechanga Indian Reservation and Resort/Casino. This project would construct the southern continuance of 6 traffic lanes from the Pala Road Bridge at Temecula Creek to the main entrance of the Pechanga Indian Reservation and ResortJCasino at Wolf Valley Road, and a 4-lane extension from that point to the entrance of the Pechanga Band of the Luiseno Indian Reservation at Pechanga Road. These improvements will include pavement, curb, gutters, storm drain facilities, sidewalks, bike lanes, traffic signals, streetlights and landscaped medians. If the grant request is successful, this project will facilitate cooperative efforts between the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Indian Reservation and adjacent developers to reduce traffic congestion, enhance traffic safety conditions and provide access and infrastructure improvements necessary to support future development along Pala Road and expansions planned on the Pechanga Indian Reservation. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Temecula has identified the Pala Road improvements within its five-year capital improvement program for FY 2000-2004, however, a specific funding source has not been identified. The cost estimate for the administration, design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of this project is $10 million. Local funds contributed from developers, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, and the City of Temecula are expected to provide $6 million toward the overall costs. The remaining $4 million that is necessary to complete the improvements would be funded through the award of the PLH grant funds. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2000- 2. Site/Vicinity Map R:\agdrpt\00\0523\TEA-21 grantsuppor~ 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALTRANS APPLICATION TO THE U,S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR PUBLIC LANDS/HIGHWAYS DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR PALA ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Public Lands Highways (PLH) Program was established in 1930 to improve access to and within the Federal lands of the nation; and Section 2. The latest transportation act, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) has continued this the program through Fiscal Year 2003; and Section 3. The California Depadment of Transportation (Caltrans) is the authorized and appropriate agency to submit applications to the U.S. Department of Transportation for funding under the PLH program; and Section 4. Approximately $70 million dollars in PLH funds are available to States having eligible transportation projects within, adjacent to, or providing access to unreserved public lands, nontaxable Indian lands or other Federal reservations; and Section 5. The current Pala Road extension from Pala Road Bridge at Highway 79 South to the Pechanga Indian Reservation and Resort/Casino consists of a two-lane roadway that is incapable of handling the level of traffic generated by the Pechanga Indian Reservation and Resort/Casino; and Section 6. The widening of this extension of Pala Road will significantly reduce traffic congestion, promote economic viability along Pala Road, and provide access and infrastructure to support future development in the area and expansions planned on the Pechanga Indian Reservation; and Section 7. The total project is estimated to cost $10 million, local funds totaling $6 million from the Pechanga Indians, the City of Temecula and developer contributions reduce the PLH funding request to $4 million; and Section 8. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby endorses and supports the Caltrans application to the U.S. Department of Transportation for the design and construction of the Pala Road street and drainage improvements to relieve traffic congestion, enhance traffic safety conditions and provide improved access and infrastructure to future development and the Pechanga Indian Reservation and ResortJCasino. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. R:~agdrpfi00\0523\TEA-21grantsupport 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 2000. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meetin~ thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:\agdrpt\00\0523\TEA-21grantsupport 4 ~PALA RD BRIDGE N.T.S. PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION RESORT & CASINO PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION LEGEND I 6 LANE ~-4 LANE CITY OFTEMECULA CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC LANDS HIGHWAYS DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM FY 2001 PALA ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS MAY 2000 ITEM 12 APPROVAL;E~ CITYATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 2000 Local Agency - State-Local Transportation Parlnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5459, Program Supplement No. 003 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the program supplement agreement between Caltrans and City of Temecula for funding Overland Drive; (Ynez Road to Margarita Road) and Margarita Road; (Winchester Road to Solana Way) in the amount of $529,258.00. RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 003 TO THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE STATE FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SB99-5459 (003), CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROAD AT OVERLAND DRIVE; YNEZ ROAD TO MARGARITA ROAD, AND MARGARITA ROAD; WINCHESTER ROAD TO SOLANA WAY BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula was successful in obtaining State-Local Transportation Partnership Program (SLTPP) State Share Funds for the Ovedand Drive; (Ynez Road to Margarita Road) and Margarita Road; (Winchester Road to Solana Way). The purpose of the project is to provide for the construction of a new road in both locations to support the development of the Promenade Mall. The construction includes AC Pavement, curb & gutter, traffic signal installation and sidewalk improvements. The design and construction of the Overland Drive and Margarita Road improvements have been completed and Final Acceptance and Notice of Completion was submitted and accepted by City Council on February 8, 2000. The attached Program Supplement No. 003 to the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Department of Transportation, Project No. SB99- 5459(003) provides for funding of this project from State Share Funds in the amount of $529,258.00 and Local Funds of $2,660,967.00 for a total amount of $3,190,225.00. Local funds are provided through Development Impact Fees and Capital Project Reserves. 1 R:~Agdrpt~2000~D523\SLTPP-SuppAgrmt5459 (003).jcd FISCAL IMPACT: By approving the Supplement Agreement the City will recover $529,258.00 in Federal monies. Local match funds for this project were provided by Development Impact Fees and Capital Project Reserves. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2000- Local Agency - State Program Supplement Agreement No. 003 Project No. SB99-5459 (003) 2 R:~Agdrpt~000~0523\SLTPP-SuppAgrmt5459 (O03).jcd RESOLUTION NO. 2000-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 003 TO THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE STATE FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SB99-5459 (003), CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROAD AT OVERLAND DRIVE; YNEZ ROAD TO MARGARITA ROAD, AND rVlARGARITA ROAD; WINCHESTER ROAD TO SOLANA WAY The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, before State-Aid will be made for the Overland Drive; (Ynez Road to Margarita Road) and Margarita Road; (Winchester Road to Solana Way), Project No. PW97-07, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement. WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 003 allocates funding in the amount of $$529,258 for Fiscal Year 1999/00, for construction of said project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement No. 003 between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula. Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement. Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 2000. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 R:~Agdrpt~000~0523\SLTPP-SuppAgrmt5459 (003)+jcd [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting therefore held on the 23rd day of May, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 R:~Agdrpfi2000~0523\SLTPP-SuppAgrmt5459 (003),jcd pROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 003 to STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5459 Date:October 05, 1999 Location: 08-RIV-0-TMCA Project Number:SB99-5459(003) E.A. N-~-her:08-924445 /his Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement for State Share Funds which was entered into between the Local Entity and the State on 07/29/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions Ihereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement anderauthorityofResolutionNo. ~ approved by the Local Entity on (See copy attached). the Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or remarks set forth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: OVERLAND DR: YNEZ TO MARGARITA. MARGARITA:WINCHESTER TO SOLANA TYPE OF WORK: CONSTRUCT NEWROAD PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK [X] Construction LENGTH: 0(MILES) Estimated Cost State Share FUnds FY1999 $0.00 LOCAL $3,190,225.00 FY2000 $529,258.00 $2,660,967.00 FY2001 $0.00 Matching FUnds OTRER $0.00 CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By Date Attest Title By Chief, Office of Local Programs Project Implementation Date Accounting Officer ~ ~ Date XO- ~. ~ 324 1998 2660-101-041 98-99 20.25.010.100 C 158010 042-T $529,258.00 529~258.00 Program Supplement SLTPP-5459-003- Page I of 2 ~8-PIV-0-TMCA ;B99-5459(003'~ 10/05/I999 SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the agreement were executed after that determination was made. The total ~nount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable by the State shall not exceed the sum of the "State Share Funds" column on page i of this Program Supplement. The funds to be encumbered and rei~abursed are according to the schedule shown under the aforementioned colunul. Any increase in State Partnership funds will require a revised program supplement. Any decrease in State Partnership funds will require a revised finance letter. The State Funds Share is calculated based on the lower of the approved eligible application amount or the eligible award al~ount. 3. Within 120 days of project completion a Final Report of Expenditures must be transn~tted to the Caltrans District Local Assistant Engineer. 4. A Final Audit must be completed and transmitted to the Caltrans District Local Assistant Engineer by December 30th (the State fiscal year following project completion}. 5. In accordance with the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Guidelines dated JUne 8, 1994, project eligibility is limited to contract items plus locally funded State or Local Entity furnished materials and Supplemental Work. Supplemental Work eligibility is further defined under the Project Eligibility section of the Guidelines as limited to certain maximum costs and to non-early reimbursement projects of 8300,000 or less. 6. The Reimbursement Ratio for this Cycle 9 (98/99) Project is 16,594. Program Supplemen~ SLTPP-5459-003- Page 2 of 2 ITEM 13 APPROVAL~ CITYATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINANC CITYMANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: City Manager/City Council ~'~NWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 2000 Award of Construction Contract for Ynez Road/Margarita Improvements, Project No. PW00-06 Amer Attar, Senior En"gif~-Capital Projects Hasib Baha, Assistant Engineer- Capital Projects Road Interim RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a construction contract for the Ynez Road/Margarita Road Interim Improvements, Project No. PWO0-06, to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. in the amount of $65,232.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,523.20, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: This construction project will provide a second southerly lane on Ynez Road from Rancho Highlands Drive to Pauba Road by widening Ynez Road near Tierra Vista Road and by re-striping from the limits of the project as shown on Exhibit "A". Also, as part of this project Margarita Road will be widened at Santiago Road to add an additional southbound lane. The two lane configuration will start from just north of the intersection of Margarita Road and Santiago Road and continues southerly to match the existing two southbound lanes. These widening and striping modifications will improve vehicle storage and flow at these intersections. In according with California Public Contract Code Section 22032(b), since the estimated cost of this project is less than $75,000, an informal bid procedure was utilized to select a contractor. Requests for bid submittals were sent to five local contractors on May 3, 2000. Only one sealed bid was received and publicly opened by the City Clerks Office on May 10, 2000 at 4:00 P.M. This bid was submitted by McLaughlin Engineering and Mining, Inc. for the amount of $65,232.00. Although only one bid was submitted, the unit prices are reasonable and are representative of a competitive bid. Staff has reviewed the bid submitted and found that McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. is qualified to construct this project. McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. has satisfactorily 1 r:~agdrpt~2000\0523\pwO0*06 award/ajp completed similar projects for the City of Temecula and other agencies in the past. The specifications allow thirty working days for the completion of this project. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for this project in the Public Works, Traffic Division, Traffic Improvement Account No. 001-164-602-5412 for the construction contract of $65,232.00 plus the 10% contingency of $6,532.20 for a total project cost of $71,755.20. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map and Project Limits, Exhibit "A" 2. Contract 2 r:~agdrpt\2000~0523\pwO0-06 award/ajp EXHIBIT "A' !-mu CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR PROJECT NO. PW00-06 YNEZ ROAD~MARGARITA ROAD INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23'u day of May, 2000 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW00-06, YNEZ ROAD~MARGARITA ROAD INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-06, YNEZ ROAD~MARGARITA ROAD INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-06, YNEZ ROAD\MARGARITA ROAD INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 R\cip~projects~pw00 06\contrad The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW00-06 YNEZ ROAD~MARGARITA ROAD INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: SIXTY FIVE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED THIRTY TWO DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($65,232.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed thirty (30) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR CONTRACT CA-2 R:\cip~prolects~pw00-06\contract filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. CONfRACT CA-3 R:\ciCproiects~pwOO-O6\contract 10. 11. 12. 13. 14, 15. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. CONTRACT CA 4 R:\clp~rolects~ow00 06\contract 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such pan thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecuta, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. CONTRACT CA-5 R\cip~orojects~pw00 06\contract 23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Director of Pubtic Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-6 R \cip~projects~pw00-06\contract IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. 41934 Main St., Suite 107 Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-7957 Wayne White, Vice President DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeffrey E, Stone, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-7 R\cip~preiects~pw00 06\contract TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APRIL tt, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:20 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Comerchero presiding. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS: Nagger, Pratt, and Comerchero ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Roberrs, Stone Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 22, 2000. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Director Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Directors Roberrs and Stone who were absent. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No comments. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT With regard to Ken Hintergardt Park, General Manager Nelson advised that the park was originally designed as a passive park; that two years later because of the changes and the dynamics of the community, a restroom facility was built; that because of the proposed Wolf Creek development, the City has not been able to secure the property necessary to construct the parking facility; that efforts will continue to ensure future securing of the property; and that the proposed parking improvements have been budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Mr. Nelson noted that the scheduling and the needs of soccer/youth groups will be addressed during the master calendar process. In closing, General Manager Nelson noted that the City provides three developed acres per 1,000 population in the City. Minutes.csd\041100 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:24 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 25, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, President Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd\041100 2 ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: GENERAL MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT General Manager/Board of Directors Herman Parker, Director of Community Services May 23, 2000 Award of Construction Contract for the Calle Aragon Park, Drainage Structures - Project No. PW99-21CSD Hasib Baha, Assistant Engineer - Capital Project~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract for the Calle Aragon Park, Drainage Structures, Project No. PW99-21CSD, to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. for $75,000.00, and authorize the President to execute the contract. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,500.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On March 21, 2000, the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project will provide for better drainage in the vicinity of the Calle Aragon Park. As part of this project a catch basin, manhole, and approximately 680 linear feet of concrete storm drain pipe will be constructed. The proposed drainage structures will help drain the standing water at the south side of Calle Aragon Park. As shown on Exhibit "A', the limits of the improvements are from Calle Arroyo Vista to 200 feet south of Calle Bahia Vista along the centerline of Avenida De La Reina. Plans and Specifications are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. Nine (9) bids were pL, olicly opened on May 11, 2000 and results are as follows: 1. McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc ........................................................$ 75,000.00 2. David T. Wasden ......................................................................................$ 82,260.00 3. Nottson Construction, Inc ............................................................................$ 82,668.40 4. Bed Salas, Inc ............................................................................................$ 84,770.00 Sean Malek Engineering .............................................................................$ 89,710.00 6. NPC Construction, Inc ................................................................................$ 89,742.00 7. Hubbs & Ferante ........................................................................................$ 89,888.00 8. SCW Contracting ........................................................................................$ 90,020.00 9. Pipe Line Equip. Rental ..............................................................................$110,310.00 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found that McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder for this project. McLaughlin Engineering and Mining, Inc. has satisfactorily completed similar construction projects for the City of Temecula and other agencies. The specifications allow Fody (40) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in June 2000 and be completed by the end of August 2000. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Calle Aragon Park Drainage Structures Project is funded by Development Impact Fees - Parks and Recreation for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 210-190-169-5804 for the construction contract of $75,000.00 plus the 10% contingency of $7,500.00 for a total project cost of $82,500.00. ATTACHMENT: Project Location Project Description Construction Contract 0 LLJ Z~ 0 O EXHIBIT "A' U rfi u, lU 0 :~ E,- U 0 ~ 0 ~- E,- U,I ~ 0 0 '3AV ,~ cl ~, TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW99-2fCSD CALLE ARAGON PARK DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23rd day of May, 2000 ,by and between the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW99-21CSD, CALLE ARAGON PARK DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed,) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW99-21CSD, CALLE ARAGON PARK DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW99-21CSD, CALLE ARAGON PARK DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed CONTRACT CA-1 R \CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-21\CONTRACT and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW99-21CSD, CALLE ARAGON PARK DRAINAGE STRUCTURES All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT. DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($ 75,000.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty (40) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by DISTRICT, CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed CONTRACT CA 2 R\CIp\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-21\CONTRACT according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on forms provided by the DISTRICT. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. D= Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The District hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. in accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum of one thousand dollars ($300.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay. CONTRACT CA 3 R\CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-21\CONTRACT 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the DISTRICT. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACT CA-4 R:\C]P\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-21\CONTRACT 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation conceming this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant convenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section CONTRACT CA-5 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PWg9\PW99-21\CONTRACT 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 22. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. 23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. 41934 Main St., Suite 107 Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-7957 Wayne White, Vice President DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OFTEMECULA By: JeffComemhero, Pmsident Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA 6 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-21\CONTRACT ITEM 3 APPROV,~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~~). May 23, 2000 Design Services Agreement - Phase I for Northwest Sports Complex Project PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award, in substantial form, final form to be approved by City Manager and the City Attorney, a Design Services Agreement - Phase I of $89,368 with RJM Design Group for the preparation of the Master Plan for the Northwest Sports Complex. 2. Approve a ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $8,936 for the Design Services Agreement, BACKGROUND: On February 16, 2000, the Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) solicited Qualifications from landscape architectural firms for design services for the Northwest Sports Complex Project. The project will determine the sports and recreational needs of the community that fit within the approximately 32-acre site and provide a Master Plan for the ultimate construction of the project. The City received eight responses to the Request for Qualifications. They were reviewed and ranked by a review committee of five staff members. The four top ranked finns were invited to participate in a presentation and interview process. The interview panel was comprised of Council Member Comerchero, TCSD Commissioner Nimeshein and staff, RJM Design Group (RJM) was determined to be the most qualified firm, Staff entered into negotiations with RJM, and have received a final scope of services and a cost proposal of $89,368 for this project. The negotiated scope of services is for Phase I of design, and includes all necessary project committee meetings, public workshops, conceptual design, preliminary construction cost estimates, and TCSD Commission and Council presentations, This phase will solicit input from the community and establish the priorities and compatibility of the vadous recreational components to be included in the final park design. F:\Depts\CSD~RUSEP~AGENDAS~northwest sports complex design ~ rjm.dec Upon completion of Phase I of the design and approval of the master plan, staff will begin negotiates with RJM for Phase II of the project design. It is envisioned that Phase II will include schematic design of the improvements, design development, construction document preparation and construction administration. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of the Design Services Agreement for Phase I is $89,368 plus an additional ten percent (10%) contingency of $8,936. This project is budgeted and approved in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 2000-2004. Sufficient appropriations are available for this item in fund 210-190-173-5802. Attachments: CIP Worksheet Design Services Agreement F:%DeptS\CSD\RUSEP%AGENDAS%northWest sports complex design - rjm.doc '~oo CITY OFTEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES No~hwe~ Spo~sComplexProject THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 23, 2000, between the City of Temecula Community Services Distdct ("District") and RJM Design Group ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on May 23, 2000, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31. 2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is set forth in Exhibit B. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The District agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed EiClhtv.-Nine Thousand Three Hundred Sixty-eight Dollars ($ 89~368 ) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in wdting by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time Distdct's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the Distdct disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give wdtten notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days pdor written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the District suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the District shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the District. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Distdct pursuant to Section 4. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, District shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant, If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder adses out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with wdtten notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such pedod of time, the District shall have the dght, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by Distdct that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi- fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of District or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give District the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit District to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a pedod of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the District and may be used, reused or othenNise disposed of by the District without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the District, upon reasonable written request by the District, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and pdnting computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the rouse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the District, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property adsing out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions adsing out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability adsing out of the negligence of the District. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG0001 11 85or88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Workers Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be wdtten on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (s) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employers Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guarenteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (2) (3) (4) (5) The District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borTowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. For any claims related to this project, the Consultanrs insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultanrs insurance and shall not contdbute with it. Any failure to comply with reporling or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultanrs insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurers liability. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party. reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the District. e. Accel~tabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A,M. Besrs rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covereae. Consultant shall furnish the District with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an alternative to the District's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Distdct a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Distdct nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the District. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against District, or bind District in any manner. b, No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for District. District shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The District, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without District's pdor written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information conceming the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives Distdct notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify District should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. District retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Distdct and to provide District with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, District's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by District to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shaft be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To District: To Consultant: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, Califomia 92590 Attention: City Manager RJM Design Group 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attention: Bob Mueting 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any pad thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without pdor written consent of the District. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Bob MuetinQ shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Bob Muetin~l may use assistants, under his direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide District fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Bob Muetin¢l from Consultant's employ. Should he leave Consultant's employ, the Distdct shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice pedod. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES. At all times dudng the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the dghts, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation cenceming this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal distdct court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecuia. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enfome its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or wdtten, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hemto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above wdtten. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT RJM Deskin Group By: Name: Robert MuetinQ, AIA, ASIA Title: Princil3al EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE May 11, 2000 Mr. Herman Parker, Director of Community Service CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Re.' City of Temecula - Sports Complex Master Plan RJM JOB NO. 559-06 Dear Herman: Per your request, we have prepared a scope of work for the City of Temecula - Sports Complex Master Plan, approximately 32 acres on Diaz Road. As you review the enclosed, please do not hesitate to call should additional information or clarification be required. It is our understanding that the proposed Sports Complex Master Plan will have the following goals, program and direction: This project will be constructed on the existing 32-acre vacant parcel on Diaz Road in the City of Temecula. Provide conceptual design and master planning, conduct community workshops, prepare construction documents and construction phasing priorities for active sports facilities. The land may be used for a baseball/softball and soccer complex and other possible recreation uses. The specific program elements for the sports complex will be determined during the community workshop meeting, and... The type, quantity and locations of the buildings for this project have not yet been determined. The services that are to be provided in this proposal do not include the schematic design, design development or construction drawings for these buildings. These services will be provided under a separate proposal after the completion of the programming and master planning services provided in this proposal. Thank you again for the opportunity to continue working with you, Phyllis, the rest of your staff, and the City of Temecula, on this important contribution to the community's recreational amenities. With Best Regards, (/~l ~ign Group, Inc. Ro. be~ Mu SLA CO N CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 · (949) 493-2600 * FAX (949) 493-2690 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE · 985 LINCOLN WAY, SUITE 206A · AUBURN, CA 95603 · (530) 823-8370 · FAX (530) 823-8379 TASK 1. PROJECT FAMILIARIZATION Obtain all documentation available from the City pertaining to this project, including available topographic and boundary survey, aerial photo, geotechnical report of site, title report and environmental assessment as available. Meet with the City staff to review project scope, requirements for the site, refine time schedules and review the existing site documentation. Work with City staff in refining the Community Workshop Process for receiving community input. C. Review state and local codes and standards applicable to the site development. Acquire available base map and resource information from City. In general, we anticipate the following resources will be necessary to be furnished by the City: 1. Environmental Impact Assessment (as available) 2. As built information of existing facilities/utilities 3. Reproducible base map (topography, boundary survey, and easements) 4. Legal description and/or Title Report 5. Existing Geotechnical Soils Investigation Information (as available) 6. Demographic profiles and facilities survey (as available) 7. Special requirements 8. Ongoing Programs 9. Special Events 10. Special/Temporary Use Permits granted in past 11. Staff projections (as available) 12. Any other studies previously completed with regards to the park site. Conduct visual analysis of existing conditions for the park site including, utilities, drainage, and topography, easements, physical limitations, external influences, access, adjacent property relationships and advise the City regarding what additional analysis might be necessary. 1. If requested by the City, we can provide an initial biological survey of the project site as an additional service. F, Prepare Aerial Topograhy of +32 acre park site, indicating all structures, above ground appurtenant items, and 1' contour intervals. 1. Set Aerial Targets with control and research 2. Survey and Plot trees 3. Aerial Topography 4. Provide digital file and hard copy format of survey. MEETINGS: (1) Kickoff meeting with key players to obtain documentation and establish project schedule. Visual analysis of existing conditions. PRODUCTS: Preliminary schedule, resource document file, topographic survey. JOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 2 TASK 2. EVALUATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Our next task will be to physically review, analyze, and document all existing site assets and deficiencies. The analysis of the site and surrounding relationships shall also be reviewed in regard to potential phasing for site improvements and for initial and future construction. A. Prepare base map in Auto Cadd format. Conduct cultural resoumes and paleontological studies consisting of a literature and records review, surface examination of the project area, and report preparation. 1. The literature review will determine the existence of previously recorded cultural and paleontological resoumes within the study area and a one-mile radius of the project boundaries. 2. The surface examination will locate all visible cultural resources, as well as locate exposed paleontological resources. (Note: Archaeological sites found on the property must be recorded, it is not possible to predict how many sites will require recording until the field examination has been accomplished, a proposal will be submitted based on the number of sites for recording. If historical sites are found on the property, a proposal will be submitted for evaluation and recording.) 3. The final cultural and paleontological resoumes reconnaissance report will include the results of the literature review and surface examination, and provide management recommendations. A map will be completed showing locations of cultural and/or paleontological resources located within the property boundaries. C. Compile a utility availability map showing existing utilities and their locations. D. Prepare site analysis and opportunities and constraints map. E. Evaluate cimulation and site access as appropriate. Assist City staff in organizing and conducting a 1-day facility tour of existing sports complexes in the area. (City to arrange for transportation and refreshments.) G. Meet with the City staff to present analysis findings and discuss potential park needs. MEETING: (1) - City staff meeting to present and discuss findings PRODUCTS: Base map at appropriate scale for site studies; utilities availability map; opportunities and constraints map; site analysis map and site access evaluation TASK 3. PROGRAMMING/DESIGN WORKSHOP/CONCEPTUAL DESIGN A primary service proposed within our overall scope of work is an intensive programming/design workshop phase. During our programming phase a design workshop will be conducted involving a site awareness tour, park program discussions and a design charette for the park master plan. The workshop will involve City Staff, Project Committee and any other special interest representation deemed appropriate by City Staff. The Programming Phase is an intensive and concentrated scenario of site planning, area projections, and functional relationships. The Programming Phase is one of the most JOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 3 important aspects of the entire project in that it shall establish the immediate foundation and relationships for all park components. The consultant shall conduct a 1/2-day park awareness tour and design charette in a workshop setting for up to 50 participants. The steps involved with this workshop are suggested to be as follows: 3. 4. 5. Site Scores/(Questionnaire) Prepare draft site scores for site workshop. Prepare workbook for site awareness tour including refined site scores. Conduct awareness tour on-site during design workshop. Conduct design charette. During the workshop, develop (3 or 5) site plan alternatives for the park at conceptual level. Compile a summary bubble diagram of workshop consensus plan(s) showing spatial relationships, site facilities and circulation. Compile summary of workshop consensus items. A Preliminary Architectural Program shall be prepared for the concession/restaurant, restroom facilities, offices, and storage facilities. Functional adjacencies, equipment specifications and support systems shall be identified and presented. 1. Provide 2-3 meetings with City and food service consultant regarding potential restaurant operations/negotiations. Conduct a meeting with the staff and Project Committee to present and discuss results from the design workshop, including consensus plan(s), spatial arrangements, the site, building, and park program. Prepare preliminary conceptual plan based on approved consensus plan for the park site including, but not limited to ball fields, soccer fields, picnic / play areas, park entrances, off street parking, administrative offices, maintenance and storage facilities, restroom facilities, trails and walking paths, and parking concepts as appropriate. E. Project Budgeting Services relating to the development of a Statement of Probable Construction Cost based on programming and scheduling studies and consisting of: · Conversion of programmed requirements to net area requirements. Development of initial approximate gross facility areas. · Evaluation of construction market conditions. · Application of unit cost data to gross areas. Estimates of related costs such as site and facility development, landscaping, utilities, services, furniture, and equipment. JOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 4 G. Conduct a feedback meeting in coordination with the City staff to present the conceptual plan and receive input from workshop participants. H. Refine plans and cost estimates as appropriate and directed by staff. I. Prepare preliminary report outlining process, findings, and recommendations. Submit final conceptual plan and preliminary opinion of probable construction costs to staff in preparation for presentation to the Community Services Commission and City Council. K. Attend Community Services Commission Meeting. L. Attend a City Council public hearing for approval of the conceptual park master plan. M. Revise the master plan and report in accordance with the direction of the city council. MEETINGS: (1) - 1/2 Day Workshop (3) - City Staff/Project Committee meetings (1) - Workshop feedback meeting (1) - Parks & Recreation Commission meeting (1) - City Council Public Hearing PRODUCTS: Meeting notes, program graphics (tissue format) and written summary of program recommendations, conceptual plan alternatives, preliminary opinion of probable cost, final conceptual plan and report. We will provide the City with a reproducible of the final plan and (1) unbound hard copy of the final report. PHASE II Note: Upon City approval of the Master Plan when specific program elements are fully identified we will provide a fee for Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding, and Construction Administration. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and work with you on this project. Sincerely, D ' n Group, Inc. Pnnc~pal IOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 5 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B FEE PROPOSAL Fee Schedule - Basic Services It is the objective of our Design Team to provide the most comprehensive, yet efficient, approach to the development of the Temecula Sports Complex. This fee includes all costs to be incurred by RJM Design Group, Inc. with the exception of selected supplemental services. Fees for the work are as follows: Phase I Task 1.0 Project Familiarization $15,408.00 Task 2.0 Evaluation of Existing Conditions $23,735.00 Task 3.0 Programming/Design Workshop/ Conceptual Design Sub Total Reimbursable Expense: Phase I Total $42,225.00 $81,368.00 $ 8,000.00 $89,368.00 Optional Service (if requested) Task 1.0, E1 Biological Site Survey $ 2,500.00 Note: This fee sammary represents our current understanding of the project scope and complexity for Temecula Sports Complex Master Plan. We would welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss our approach to this Scope of Work and revise it as necessary to more accurately meet the needs of the City of Temecula. The above fee was arrived at based upon an estimate on man-hours and hourly rates per task. Phase II Note: Upon City approval of the Master Plan when specific program elements are fully identified we will provide a fee proposal for Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding, and Construction Administration for the initial phase of construction. An estimated fee range for Phase II services based on a final construction budget range from $3.5 to $4.5 million will be $250,000 to $350,000. All reimbursable costs including priming, reproduction, photo and delivery will be billed to the City in addition to the basic fee at cost plus 15%. To avoid an allowance for reimbursable printing, we suggest that the City open an account with a local blueprinting company which would save the City dollars allotted to consultant administration and mark up. JOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 7 When incurred, the following project expenses will be billed at cost plus 15% handling fee: · All consultant reproduction Printing, plotting, copying, photography, graphic expenses, phone, fax, special delivery and handling of documents, and shipping Permits, plan check, and inspection fees Soils testing PAYMENTS Payments will be due and payable on a monthly basis following the completion of any substantial phase of work. Carrying charges for overdue accounts beyond 30 days of billing date are charged at 1-1/2% of the amount due, compounded monthly. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services will be performed at your request, and shall be considered additional services to the above, reimbursable on an hourly basis: Additional meetings and site visits beyond those identified as authorized by the City of Temecula. B. Exhibit preparation beyond that identified in the Scope of Services. C. Preparation of mitigated negative declaration and/or special studies. RJM shall provide the necessary plan check revisions requested by the City for two plan check reviews. All subsequent changes shall be done in accordance with the attached Standard Hourly Fee Schedule. If it is in the interest of the project to engage or retain the services of any other consultants (graphic/sign designer, environmental engineer, food service consultant, etc.), then upon Client's written authorization, RJM Design Group, Inc. may engage or retain any such consultant, and the engagement of each consultant shall be an expenditure reimbursable to RJM Design Group, Inc., plus a 15% coordination fee. Should the services of geologist, or soils engineer be required, the Client shall select, retain, or engage such consultant directly Compensation for supplemental services will be on an hourly basis at our standard rates as follows: CONSULTANTS No special consulting services other than those identified are included as part of the professional services. JOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 8 STANDARD HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ASSOCIATE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CADD/DESIGNER DRAFTSPERSON WORD PROCESSING $100 per hour $90 per hour $80 per hour $70 per hour $55 per hour $45 per hour MCE CONSlILTING PRINCIPAL PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT SURVEYOR DESIGN ENGINEER ASSOCIATE ENGINEER PROJECT ASSISTANT 3-MAN SURVEY CREW 2-MAN SURVEY CREW $110 per hour $90 per hour $80 per hour $75 per hour $65 per hour $50 per hour $40 per hour $190 per hour $148 per hour BONTERRA CONSULTING PRINCIPAL $105 per hour RMW PALEO ASSOCIATES CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL SERVICES CLERICAL MILEAGE $75 per hour $40 per hour $0.32/mile JIM MICKARTZ PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT $90 per hour $75 per hour WEBB DESIGN PRINCIPAL DESIGN DIRECTOR PROJECT MANAGER CADD/DESIGNER $150 per hour $120 perhour $100 per hour $55 perhour LTP CONSULTING PRINCIPAL LIGHTING CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGERf DESiGNER DRAFTING/CADD CLERICAL $115 per hour $115 perhour $95 perhour $50 per hour $40 per hour SWEENEY & ASSOCIATES PRINCIPAL SENIOR IRRIGATION DESIGNER IRRIGATION DESIGNER CLERICAL $80 per hour $70 per hour $65 per hour $40 per hour Billings for all time and materials and contract extension work shall be in accordance with the level of work performed and will be broken into the categories listed above. Fees will be escalated each August 1st in accordance with any increase in the Consumer's Price Index or other mutually agreed upon cost index, beginning with August 1, 2000 All provisions for fee escalation pertain to all contract extensions and additional work. JOBS\500\559-06\Scope of Services and Fee Proposal 9 ITEM 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, General Manager DATE: May 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Ratification of Election Results - Woodside Chantemar Homes, Tract No. 28510 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative Secretary RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON MAY 11, 2000 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW BACKGROUND: At the meeting of March 21, 2000, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. CSD 2000-07, which called for a Special Election to be held among the property owners of the parcels within Woodside Chantemar Homes, Tract No. 28510. The purpose of this election was to establish Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D rates and charges for fiscal year 2000-01. This election was conducted by mail with a final date for acceptance of ballots to be no later than 3:30 p.m. on May 11, 2000. At 4:00 p.m. on that date, the City Clerk acting in her capacity as the City's Election Official and as the Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District declared the receipt period for receiving ballots closed. At 4:00 p.m., the Elections Canvassing Board duly appointed and consisting of City Clerk Susan Jones, Deputy City Clerk Michaela Ballreich and Administrative Secretary Cheryl Dornenoe, conducted the canvass of the results. The results of the votes cast, returned within the time allowed and publicly counted, are included within the body of the proposed resolution. Agenda Reports~lection CSD Tract 28510 I Staff recommends adoption of the resolution ratifying the results of this election. FISCAL IM PACT: Them is no direct fiscal impact as a consequence of the ratification of the election results. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. CSD 2000- Of~dal Tally of the Votes Agenda Reports\Election CSD Tract 28510 2 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON May 1'1, 2000 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a Spedal Mail-in Ballot Election was held and conducted in the City of Temecula, California, on May 11, 2000, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that the special election was for the purpose of obtaining approval by property owners within Woodside Chantemar Homes, Tract No. 28510, for establishment of the annual levy of TCSD Rates and Charges for each affected parcel as follows: Service Level B, $25.68 per residential parcel; Service Level C, $225.00 per residential parcel; and Service Level D, $172.56 per occupied residential parcel was propedy established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. CSD 2000-07, adopted March 21, 2000, the ballots were returned to the office of the City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District; the results were received, canvassed in public and are herein set forth in Section 2. NOW THEREFORE, THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the homeowners election was one (1) and the whole number of provisional ballots cast in the election was none (0). Section 2. That the whole number of ballots cast for establishment of the annual levy for Service Level B, $25.68 per residential parcel; Service Level C, $225.00 per residential parcel; and Service Level D, $172.56 per occupied residential parcel on the ballot were as follows: Yes No one none Incomplete none Section 3. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District does declare and deterTnine that as a result of the election, a majodty of the voters voting on the measure relating to the establishment of Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2000-01 pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution, did vote in favor of the measure and that the measure was carded, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified. Resos. CSD~ 1 Section 4. The City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services Distdct (TCSD) shall enter in the minutes of the TCSD Board of Directors, a statement of the result of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the City; (2) The votes in favor, (3) The votes in opposition and (4) Those received incomplete. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 23rd day of May, 2000. A'~'rEST: Jeff Comerchero, President Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk/District Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2000- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services Distdct on the 23rd day of May, 2000, by the following roll call vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISTRICT MEMBERS: DISTRICT MEMBERS: DISTRICT MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City CleddDistdct Secretary Resos. CsD%2000- 2 OFFICIAL TALLY OF THE VOTES FOR TCSD LEVY/SPECIAL TAX WOODSIDE CHANTEMAR HOMES, TRACT NO 28510 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2000/01 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SLOPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Yes. ..No TOTAL ~ TOTAL ELECTION BOARD · Jones, C lerk f~cer Michaela A. Ballreich, t Cheryl Domehoe, Election Officer F:~DEpTS\CITYCLRKXPUBLIC HEARINGS\CSD - CANVASS FOR CSD RATES & CHARGES VOTE,DO C ITEM 5 APPRONVE_~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN E CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~:~, May 23, 2000 Cultural Arts Master Plan Implementation PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file this update report from the Arts Council regarding the implementation of the Cultural Arts Master Plan. DISCUSSION: In eady 1999, the City of Temecula developed a Cultural Arts Master Plan to provide a guide for the enhancement of ads and cultural education in the City of Temecula. The plan has identified several goals and objectives and direction for the City to follow to achieve these goals. In the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 budget process, the Arts Council of Temecula Valley was awarded a grant to assist with the implementation of various goals and objectives in the Cultural Arts Master Plan. TCSD staff has worked closely with Martha Minkler, Executive Director of the Arts Council; to implement many of the objectives outlined in the Cultural Arts Master Plan. Tonight, Martha Minklet is here to provide the Board with a brief update on the implementation of goals and objectives by the Arts Council of Temecula Valley. FISCAL IMPACT: The City Council awarded the Arts Council $42,500 through the Community Services Department operating budget for this fiscal year to begin the implementation of the Cultural Arts Master Plan. ITEM 6 APPROV,,~. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITYMANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service May 23, 2000 Senior Center Expansion Project PREPARED BY: Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the conceptual design for the expansion of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. 2. Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the Senior Center Expansion Project. BACKGROUND: In May 1999, the City Council awarded a design services agreement to Davidson & Allen, Architects, to develop a conceptual plan, specifications and construction documents, for the expansion of the Mary Phillip's Senior Center. A design committee was established which consisted of City Council members, Community Services Commissioner Jack Henz, Senior Center representatives and staff. The committee met on several occasions to discuss the design and expansion of the center. The consultant also conducted a community wide workshop to gather information and input from the community related to this project. These concepts and ideas have been incorporated into the master plan for the facility expansion. The expansion will add an additional 3,143 square feet to the existing Senior Center. It will add two additional meeting rooms, a larger billiards room, restrooms and storage areas. The current library and craft room will be relocated and renovated. New equipment will also be installed in the kitchen and modifications are proposed for the reception area. This project has undergone an environmental review and has been determined to be Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The project is funded using CDBG funds and it would be staff's intent to ~nalize construction documents and begin construction in the fall of 2000. F:\DeptS\CSD\MCCarthC~AGENDAS\052300 Board Senior Center Expansion.doc Mr. Dean Davidson of Davidson & Allen Architects is hem this evening to present the conceptual Master Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: The Architect's preliminary estimate for construction is $513,200. This project was approved as part of the FY 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program. Community Block Grant Funds have been received over a period of three years to fund this project. The funds are budgeted and will be available in account number 210-190-163-5804. ATTACHMENT: Proposed Floor Plan F:\Depts\CSD\McCarthC~AGENDAS\052300 Board Senior Center Expansion.doc ITEM 7 C,TY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Servic~,~, May 23, 2000 Racing at the Northwest Sports Complex RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1) Approve four (4) racing dates requested by the Temecula Town Association (TTA) and hosted by the Southern California Flat Track Association, for motorcycle racing per the attached race schedule, beginning no earlier than 9 am and concluding no later than 6 PM each date, and not exceeding 90 dB 100' from the race track. 2) Approve eight (8) racing dates requested by the 'F]'A and hosted by CJ Racing, Inc., for auto races in the attached automobile classifications and schedule, beginning no earlier than 9 am and concluding no later than 6 PM each date, and not exceeding 90 dB 100' from the race track. BACKGROUND: On May 16, 2000, a sub-committee of the City Council consisting of Mayor Jeff Stone and Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Comerthem, met with the TTA, members of the racing community, members of staff and neighboring homeowners who expressed concern about racing held at the Northwest Sports Complex. The purpose of the meeting was to let the homeowners and racing proponents express their issues related to racing at the park site. Regarding motorcycle racing at the facility, homeowners in close proximity to the park site and the Southern California Flat Track Association discussed motorcycle racing at the facility and agreed to allow racing to occur at the facility on the dates of June 10, July 22, August 19 and October 21, 2000. Both parties agreed that the decibel level during the racing should not exceed 90 dB 100' from the track and that all racing at the track should stop or cease before 6 PM. As a result, the sub- committee is recommending approval of these four motorcycle race dates. With regards to automobile racing, homeowners that reside in close proximity to the park site supported allowing eight (8) racing dates to occur at the park site. The races could not begin any eadier than 9 am and all rating should be concluded by 6 PM. The decibel level reading 100' from the racetrack must not exceed 90 dB. The race dates for automobile racing are June 17, June 24, July 8, July 15, July 29, August 5, August 12 and August 26. Only seven classes of automobiles will be allowed to race on these dates per the attached list. R:~ZIGLERG\REPOF{T~acing at NWSC Modi~ed.doc At the time of this meeting, CJ Racing, Inc., was uncertain of the impacts that the time frames would create and as a result did not commit to continuing with the race schedule. However, the sub- committee is recommending approval of these auto race dates and conditions if CJ Racing, Inc., chooses to continue with its race schedule. The homeowners who were in attendance and participated in this meeting were also the homeowners that attended the April 25, 2000, Board of Directors meeting and expressed their concern to the Board regarding racing at the park site. With the exceptioFrof CJ Racing, Inc., who is uncertain as to whether the time constraints will work with their racing participants, all parties involved have agreed to these terms. The City of Temecula will m~nitor these race dates to ensure that all racing concludes at or before 6:00 PM. The TTA has hosted these racing events at the Northwest Sports Complex under an agreement to provide special events and activities at the park site with the City of Temecula. The TTA's agreement also indemnifies the City of Temecula against any legal action that could ensue. The City of Temecula is beginning the design process for the Northwest Sports Complex. It is envisioned that this facility will be developed to include active sports fields for youth sport activities. As a result, no race schedules will be approved after October 31, 2000. FISCAL IMPACT: Racing events sponsored by the TTA at the Northwest Sports Complex will generate $375 per race date. ATTACHMENTS: CJ Racing, Inc. Racing Schedule and Dates Southern California Flat Track Association Race Dates List of Seven (7) Automobile Classifications for Racing F:\DEPTS\CSD~ZIGLERG\REPORT\Racing at NWSC Modified.doc TEMECULA SPEEDWAY 2000 Schedule All races to conclude by 6:00 p.m. Saturday, June 17th Saturday, June 24th Saturday, J u ly 8th Saturday, July 15th Saturday, July 29th Saturday, August 5th Saturday, August 12th Saturday, August 26th Southern California Flat Track Association, Inc. 2000 Schedule All races to conclude by 6:00 Saturday, June 10th Saturday, July 22"~ Saturday, August 19th Saturday, October 21st Temecula SI3eedwav-' Race Car Classifications Mini Dwarf Speedway Midget Micro Midget Wing Mighty Spring Wing Mini Sprint Wing Dwarf Car Antique Midget TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAI~,~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, May 23, 2000 Director of Community ServicesF'~r~. SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi- Trail System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates at the top ranked firm, The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. This project is currently in design. On January 11, 2000, the City Council awarded a contract to Lighting Contract Services to make modifications to the lighting at the Margarita Community Park tennis courts and roller hockey rink. The project includes installing fencing between the park site and the creek. This project is nearing completion. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The project design committee has held a community workshop and toured aquatic facilities in San Diego County. Recently, the TVUSD made a final decision on the dimensions of the proposed large pool. Staff will proceed with coordinating design committee meetings to determine the final design components of the facility. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be constructed on the City's northwest sports park site, Statements of Qualifications were received on February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A contract will go forward to the Board of Directors on May 23, 2000 to approve a design contract with the top ranked firm RJM Design Group. R:\ZIGLERG\XDEPTRPT\0005 .doc May 15, 2000 Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and specifications for the Temecula Library. The project committee is meeting regularly to complete the design detail elements for the library. The City Council recently awarded a contract to AMS Planning and Research to prepare the Children's Museum Feasibility Study. A community workshop was held on March 29, 2000 at 7:00 PM at City Hall, and a sub-committee meeting is scheduled for March 30, 2000. The Children's Museum Feasibility Study will be presented to the City Council on July 11, 2000. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. The Recreation Division is currently reviewing the final draft of the Summer/Fall 2000 edition of the Recreation Guide to Leisure Activities. This issue of the brochure will be mailed out to all City of Temecula residents the first week of June 2000. The Recreation staff is currently preparing for the annual Star Spangled 4th Of July activities. This annual event attracts approximately 10,000 participants of all ages. The Recreation Division continues to program classes, activities and excursions at all City recreation facilities. R:\ZIGLERG\XDEFFRPT\0005 .doc May 15. 2000 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APRIL 11, 2000 A regu[ar meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:24 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Pratt, and Naggar ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBER: Roberts and Stone. Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. In light of Chairman Roberts' absence, Vice Chairman Naggar presided over the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 22, 2000. MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Agency Members Roberrs and Stone who were absent. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comments. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. Minutes. RDA\041100 I ADJOURNMENT At 8:25 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 25, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Robe~s, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] Minutes. RDA~041100 2 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager ~ May 23, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of May 23, 2000 for the Redevelopment Department. HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Program Funding in the amount of $250,000 is available for FY 99-00. Six loans have been dosed for $113,860. Residential Improvement Programs For FY 99/00, fifty-five projects have been completed and five are in process. The program budget is $250,000 and $218,353 has been funded. The majodty of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement. Affordable Rental Housing Projects- Annual Reporting For RDA-assisted rental housing, annual reporting is required to ensure all tenants continue to meet income chteda outlined in the Project Regulatory Agreement and that all rents charged are within established affordable limits. Rancho Creek Apartments on Felix Valdez Road was audited as part of their annual requirements, they have corrected all substandard housing conditions as requested. Staff is still working with the owner to relieve over-crowding in six units. Habitat for Humanity Habitat has submitted plans to the Building Department. Title to the property will be transferred to Habitat after construction plans are approved. Grading of the site is scheduled for May. The blitz-build is scheduled for mid-June 2000. F:\DEPTS\REDEV\SYERSK\MONTHLLY\report,MayOO.doc Request for Qualifications - Affordable Housing An RFQ was distributed on March 15, 2000 to identify qualified developers to develop affordable housing at three Pujol sites. Three qualified developers have been interviewed. Request for Qualifications - Senior Housinq An RFQ was distributed on Apdl 18, 2000 to identify interested, qualified developers to develop affordable senior housing in or around Old Town. The responses received on May 18, 2000 are under review. Request for Qualifications - Old Town Communitv Theater Interviews were held on April 4 to select a qualified architect for the Old Town Community Theater. The subcommittee selected the architectural firm, Fisher Merriman Sehgal Yanez Inc. Negotiations are in process and a final contract will be brought to the Council at a later date. Facade ImprovemenUNon-Conforming Sign Program The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: 41915 4th Street (historic Structure) Kriegers General Store Complete FaC~ade Renovation The following facade improvements are underway: · Second Street Automotive (Second and Mercedes) Complete Facade Renovation · Rancon Building (Front Street) Repaint Trim & Sign · The Temeku Market and Porch (Front Street) Fire Sprinklers · Musician's Workshop Far, ade and Sign · McLaughlin Engineering - 41934 Main Street Exterior Paint and Signs · Clock Tower Building Wood stain and seal · Palomar Hotel Plans have been submitted for the rahabilitation of the hotel and its conversion to a Bed and Breakfast. The Agency will provide financial assistance through the FaC~ade Improvement Program. R:\syersk\monthly\report. May 2 Circle K Center in Old Town The Redevelopment Agency has negotiated assistance for the rehabilitation of the center. Plans, which include western-style architedural enhancements, are in the design phase. R:\syersk\monthly\report. May 3 ITEM 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVA 1' CiTY MANAGER ,~ ~ ' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/C~mcil Debbie Ubnosk/~, Planning May 23, 2000 Antenna Ordinance Manager Prepared By: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ANTENNA ORDINANCE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0242) 2. Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-__ AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242) 3. Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-__ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242) BACKGROUND: In 1999 the City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting the construction of additional wireless telecommunications facilities. This action resulted from the public controversy associated with the proposal to construct an additional antenna site near the Rancho California Water District water tanks east of Meadow Parkway in the Chardonnay Hills area. The moratorium ordinance was put into effect to provide the City an opportunity to develop revised antenna standards. The moratorium ordinance will be in effect until July 27, 2000. The adoption of the proposed Ordinance will also repeal the moratorium. DISCUSSION The Ordinance is intended to provide a unified and comprehensive set of regulations for all the different types of antennas. The adoption of the Antenna Ordinance as an intedm and regular ordinance combined with the immediate repeal of the moratorium will allow the telecemmunicetions industry to begin making immediate applications for new sites. The proposed Ordinance would address the following type of antennas: Residential radio and television antennas; · Citizens band radio antennas; · Amateur radio antennas; · Earth-satellite dish antennas; Vertical or whip antennas; and · Wireless telecommunications antennas. The Ordinance has been structured to encourage certain types and sizes of antennas through the usa of simplified approval precasses. The different ways an antenna can be approved pursuant to the proposed Ordinance are as follows: Exempt from Planning Department permitting (may still need a Building Permit); Administrative design review (no public hearing); Director hearing; and Planning Commission hearing. A matrix comparing the type and size of the antenna with the proposed approval authority is contained in Attachment No. 6. A copy of the proposed urgency and regular ordinances are contained in Attachment Nos. 2 and 3. Finally, the City of Temecula is pre-empted by Federal Law from regulating any potential Non-ionizing Radiation (NIER) that may result from these facilities. However, the proposed Ordinance would require that application for these facilities submit proof that the proposed antenna complies with the Federal requirements and all approvals would require the continuous compliance with the Federal Standards. A major goal of the Ordinance is to focus the City's review efforts on those types of antennas that have the greatest potential to adversely impact the community. This means for many types of antennas, that no Planning Department permit or that only an administrative design review would be required. The draft Antenna Ordinance is proposing to address antennas in the following ways. Residential Radio and Television Antennas. The requirements for these antennas would remain the sam. For the vest majodty of homeowners, no Planning Department permit would be required. However, for freestending antennas over 10 feet in height, staff is proposing that these requests go to a Director Headng. This would provide the neighbors an opportunity to be informed about, and comment upon, the request. Citizens Band and Amateur Radio Antennas. The requirements for these types of antennas is similar to the current requirements. These type of antennas, up to 35' would be exempt from a Planning Department permit. Antennas over this height would then require some form of public hearing; either before the Planning Director or the Planning Commission. Most of these antennas would still require some form of building permit. Earth-Satellite Dish Antennas. The Ordinance would regulate dish antennas differently in residential and corninertial areas, Typical residential antennas up to 2 meters in diameter would be considered accessory uses in single-family residential areas. In high density residential, cornmartial and industrial areas more stringent design review would be required. The exception to this general rule is that dish antennas 1 meter (39.4") or smaller in diameter would always be exempt from review as long as they are located below the ridgeline of the dwelling. Vertical or VVhip Antennas. These common business antennas were not previously addressed in the Ordinance. The proposed standard would allow a business to get approval to locate two vertical antennas on site without having to go through a review process. Businesses wanting to have more than two whip antennas, or wanting to have tell antennas would need to go through administrative design review to ensure area compatibility. This is similar to how staff is dealing with these antennas at present. Wireless Telecommunications Antennas. The Ordinance is based on the premise that wireless telecommunication antennas are important community infrastructure that should not be visually intrusive. To that end, staff is proposing that the level of design review increase as the potential for visual impact increases. For example, an antenna that is mounted on a building and designed to fit into the arshitecturel theme of the structure would be approvable at a staff level with headrig. Any freestending antenna, including all monopeles, would require a pubtic hearing before the Planning Commission. Staff believes that this will encourage the placement of inconspicuous antennas to meet the resident's and local businesses wireless telecommunication needs. Co-located Antennas. The Ordinance describes a co-located antennas as more that two antenna arrays located on the same support structure. Staff is proposing that applications for co-location, except for building mounted antenna arrays, be approved at a Director Hearing. Building mounted co-located antennas are proposed to remain administrative approvals. Multi-User Sites. The ordinance describes a multi-user site as an area with more than one antennas suppert structure. The multi-user site provision is the exception to the requirement that antenna structures be located no closer together than 1000 feet. Staff is proposing that applications for multi-user sites be approved by the Planning Commission. Finally, any type of antenna that is not specifically exempted, targeted for administrative design review, or a director hearing, would automatically require the Planning Commission's review and approval. The Ordinance would also allow (generally without a Planning Department permit) up to one dtjzens band or amateur radio antenna and up to two dish antennas in conjunction with a single-family residence. Exempt antennas are still required to comply with the applicable design and performance standards. The Ordinance also contains development and performance standards for all antennas. The topice for the design and performance standards are as follows: Locatjon and Facility Separation; Basic Tower and Building Design; Airports and Heftpads; · Co-Located and Multiple User Facilities; · Vegetation Protection and Facility Screening; · Lighting; · Roads and Parking; Environmental Resource Protection; · Noise and Traffic; and Visual Compatibility. Staff has provided various drafts of this ordinance to a number of wireless communication industry representatives for their review and comment. The vast majodty of their comments have been incorporated in the draft Ordinance. A list of the industry representatives who partidpeted in the eadier meeting, or who have been provided copies of the Ordinance to review are contained in Attachment No. 7. The Planning Commission considered the draft Antenna Ordinance at their May 17, 2000 meeting. After discussion the Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Ordinance. The results of the Commission's deliberations will be presented during staff's presentation. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff prepared an Initial Environmentel Study for the proposed Ordinance. Based upon that analysis, the Planning Commission is recommending that a Negative Declaration be adopted. The resolution adopting the Negative Declaration is included in Attachment No. 1. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of this Ordinance will have no direct financial impacts. The permit streamlining proposed in the Antenna Ordinance will result in some City staff costs going un-reimbursed. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Proposed Resolution - Page 5 Proposed Urgency Ordinance - Page 8 Proposed Regular Ordinance - Page 29 Planning Commission Resolution - Page 48 Initial Study - Page 51 Antanna Approval Matrix - Page 52 List of Wireless Communications Industry developing the Draft Ordinance - Page 54 Representatives who participated in ATTACHMENT NO, 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Attachment No. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ANTENNA ORDINANCE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0242) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA97-0242 in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on May 17, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public headng pertaining to the Application on May 23, 2000, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the Application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. The City Council, in approving the Negative Declaration hereby makes the following findings A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City staff prepared an Initial Environmental Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Ordinance. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Ordinance could have a significant effect on the environment. Thereafter, staff clrculatod a public notice requested public comment on its intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the Antenna Ordinance. No public comments were received. B. The City Council has reviewed the Initial Environmental Study and all comments, written and oral, received regarding the proposed Negative Declaration, and based upon the whole record before it, finds the following: 1. That the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; 2. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and, 3. That the City Council further finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration for the Antenna Ordinance. Section 3. Section 4. of Temecula this The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City day of ,2000. A'FrEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and mgulady adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of , 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PROPOSED URGENCY ORDINANCE ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 00~ AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. a) Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission, on March 17, 2000, and City Coundl of the City of Temecula, State of California, on May 23, 2000, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the Municipal Code of the City of Temecula. b) The adoption of Chapter 17.40 and its inclusion into the Temecula Munidpal Code is intended to establish the beneficial design and development standards directed to be developed by City Coundl Ordinance No. 99-17. Ordinance No. 99-17 recognized and inceqx)rated the dimctjon adsing under federal policy that all moratoriums on the development of wireless telecommunications fodlittes be terminated at the eadiest possible time. There centinuas to be a demand to expand the scope of wireless telecommunicatjons fadlity coverage. The proponents of such fodlities desire to have the City Coundl and the federal directive that the development moratorium be terminated, at the eadiest possible date, be carried out. c) Pursuant to California Govemment Code Sections 36934 and 36937, the City Coundl hereby finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and the furtherance of the dimdives discussed above, necessitates the immediate enactment of this Ordinance for the facts discussed above and upon the facts presented to this Coundl. Section 2. Chapter 17.40 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 17.40 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND ANTENNA ORDINANCE 17.40.010 Purpose The puq~ose and intent of this chapter is to provide a uniform and comprehensive set of standards for the installation and maintenance of telecommunicetion facilities and antennas to achieve the goals, objectives and polides of the Ternecula General Plan. It is furthermore intended that, to the extent permitted by law, the City shall apply these regulations to specifically accomplish the following: A. Protect and promote public health, safety and welfare of the dtizens of Temecula; Protect the visual character of the City from the potential adverse effects of telecommunication facility development and antenna installation by maintaining architectural and structural integrity and preventing unsightly facilities; Insure against the creation of visual blight within or along the City's scenic corddor and ridgelines; D= Retain local responsibility for and control over the use of public right-of-way to protect citizens and enhance the quality of their lives; Protect the inhabitants of Temecula, to the extent permitted by law, from the possible adverse health effects associated with exposure to high levels of NIER (non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation); F. Protect environmental resources in and around Temecula; G. Promote the planned and managed development of telecommunications infrastructure; H= Promote fair and effective telecommunication services and insure that a broad range of competitive telecommunications services with high quality telecommunications infrastructure are available to serve the community; Create and preserve telecommunicetion facilities that will serve as an important and effective part of Temecula's emergency response network; Establish simplified and shortened approval processes for obtaining permits to install and operate telecommunication facilities while at the same time protecting the legitimate interests of Temecula citizens to the maximum extent possible; K. Ensure area access to satellite telecommunications services; and L. Encourage the co-location of new telecommunication antennas. Furthermore, it is the stated goal of the City of Temecula that these local restrictions and regulations shall not preclude the reception of acceptable signal quality, create an unreasonable delay, prevent, or increase the cost of installing, maintaining and using these facilities. It is also the stated intent of this Chapter to provide a public forum to insure a balance between public concams and pdvate interests in establishing telecommunication and related facilities. 17.40.020 General Requirements for all Telecommunication Facilities and Antennas No non-exempt telecommunication facility or antenna shall be constructed or operated without the appropriate City entitlement. All non-exempt telecommunication facilities and antennas shall meet the following general requirements and standards. Be consistent with applicable General Plan Goals, Objectives, Programs and Policies, Specific Plan, Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Standards, Design Guidelines, and the permit requirements of any agency which has jurisdiction over the project; Meet all the requirements established by the other chapters of the Temecula Municipal Code end Temecula Development Code that are not in conflict with the requirements contained in this chapter; C. Comply with all applicable FCC rules, regulations, and standards; No antenna, antenna array, or wireless telecommunications antenna arrays shell be located within any recognized local or national histodc district, or on a structure recognized as a local or nationel histodc landmark, unless screening has been provided to completely camouflage the facility; Comply with the Uniform Building Code, National Electdc Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and Uniform Fire Code, where applicable; Comply with applicable Airport land use compatibility criteria/policies and Federal Aviation Administration regulations; Antennas shell be constructed of metal or other non-flammable material, unless specifically approved by the City to be otherwise; Shall not be installed in any location where it could impede normal vehicular or pedestrian circulation, ingress to, or egress from any building, structure, or parking facility; I. Maintain applicable easements or similar restdctions on the subject property; All setbacks shell be measured from the base of the tower or structure to the applicable property line or structure and shall not be situated between the pdmary building on the parcel and any public or pdvate street adjoining the parcel, so as to create a negative visual impact; Maintain a secudty program when determined to be necessary by, and subject to the review and approval of, the Temecula Police Department that will prevent unauthorized access and vandalism; Satellite earth station antennas (dishes and parabolic antennas) larger than I meter in diameter shall be situated as close to the ground as possible to reduce visual impact without compromising their function; All references to different zones and zoning districts shall also be construed to mean the planning areas in an approved Specitic Plan; Shall not contain or add advertising or signs to telecommunications facilities and antennas. Not withstanding the previous, the co-location of telecommunicetions antennas onto legally established sign structures is not prohibited. The location of wireless telecommunicetion antennas shall be considered on a case by case basis where the intent of the support structure is for advertising purposes only and the structure complies with all applicable sign ordinance requirements; and O. Not withstanding the provisions of Subsection N above, all freestending telecommunication sites shall provide unlight identification signage of not more than %~TEMEC_FSt01%VOL1~Dep~%PLANNING',Ordinances%ANTENN/qt42PA97 CC1 .doc three (3) square feet. The sign shall indicate the name of the company operating the facility and shall provide a phone number to be called in an emergency. The sign should be located near the entrance to the support facility. 17.40.025 Publicly Owned Property The provisions of this Chapter shall also apply to the placement of non-exempt wireless telecommunication facilities and antennas on publicly owned proparty within the City of Temecula. 17.40.030 Application Requirements All applications for non-exempt telecommunications facilities and antennas shell comply with the submittal requirements authorized by Section 17.03.030. In addition, other specific supplemental requirements described in this Section may also be required. The decision to require additionel information with as part of an application shall be made by, and be at the sole discretion of, the planning director. A. Examples of supplemental project information that may be required include the following: 1. Service area and network maps; Alternative site analysis and altemative facility designs. The analysis shall identify all reasonable, technically feasible, alternative locations and/or facilities which could provide the proposed telecommunication service. The analysis shall address the potential for co-location at an existing or a new site and the potential to locate facilities as close as possible to the intended service area. It shall also explain the rationale for selection of the proposed site in view of the relative medts of any of the feasible alternatives. The intention of the alternatives analysis is to present alternative strategies which would minimize the number, size, and adverse environmental impacts of facilities necessary to provide the needed services to the City and surrounding rural and urban areas; Visual impact analyses or demonstrations (including mock-ups and/or photomontages). Consideration shall be given to views from public areas as well as from pdvata residences. The analysis shall be '~vorst case" and shall assess the cumulative impacts of the proposed facility and other existing and foreseeable telecommunication facilities in the area, and shall identify and include all feasible mitigation measures consistent with the technological requirements of the proposed telecommunication service; and Information on the location of other nearby telecommunication facilities within the city limits of Temecula and within one mile of the proposed facility; Special design studies of the proposed facilities where findings of particular sensitivity will have to be made (e.g. proximity to historic or aesthetically significant structures, views and/or community facilities.) The planning direct. or is explicitly authorized at his/her discretion to employ on behalf of the City an independent technical expert to review any submitted supplemental or technical materials or provide technical knowledge to the City. The technical expert shall be agreeable to both the City and the service provider. The applicant shall pay all the costs of said review, including any administrative costs incurred by the City. F:~Depts~PLANNING¥3rdinance~ANTENNA~242PA97 CC1 .doc 12 Any proprietary information that is disclosed to the City or any expert hired shall be located in a separate pdvate file, shall remain confidential, and shall not be disclosed to any third party. 17.40.040 Determination of Height The height of the support structure must be the minimum necessary to provide the required coverage. Antenna and structure heights are determined in the following manner. For ground mounted antennas: The height of the antenna structure shall be measured from the natural undisturbed ground surface below the center of the base of the tower to the top of the tower or from the top of the highest antenna or piece of equipment attached thereto, whichever is greater. For building mounted antennas: The height of the antenna structure shall be measured from the top of the building roof on which the antenna is mounted to the top of the antenna or screening structure, whichever is higher. The height of antenna structures that are attached to a building shall be measured from the top of the building roof. In the case of "crank-up" or other similar towers, whose height can be adjusted, the height of the tower shall be considered the maximum height to which it is capable of being raised. 17.40.050 Non-Exempt Telecommunication Facilities and Antennas in Residential Zones Non-exempt facilities may be installed, erected, maintained and/or operated in any residential zoning district, except within recognized histodc districts, where such antennas are permitted under this title, without the need for a use permit or other entitlement. The following wireless communication facilities are permitted as accessory uses if in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Any satellite earth station antenna designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct-to-home satellite services and multi-channel multi-point distribution services, provided that such antenna is one meter (39.4 inches) or less in diameter. If the diameter of the antenna is 18 inches or less, the antenna may extend above the ridgeline of a roof only to a height that is reasonably necessary to ensure the reception of broadcast signals of an acceptable quality. If the diameter of the antenna exceeds 18 inches, but does not exceed 39 inches, then the antenna may not extend above the ridgeline of a roof. Any satellite earth station antenna that is designed to be a receive only dish antenna that is less than ten and one-half (10.5) feet in diameter. Provided that the top the antenna does not extend more than 12 feet above the ground. C, Any vertical antenna that is designed solely to receive television broadcast signals. Such an antenna, if ground-mounted, shall be no more than (10) feet in height, If the antenna is building-mounted the height of the antenna may not exceed more than ten (10) feet above the roof. Any citizens band or amateur radio antenna for a licensed amateur radio operator provided that the maximum height of the antenna does not exceed thirty five (35) feet above the ground surface. F:~:hffits%PLANNING%Ordinances~ANTENNA%242PA97 CC1 .doc 13 E. The following requirements apply to all facilities described in this Section. The antenna is accessory to the pdmary use of the property and that the use of the property is not a telecommunications facility; Exempt antennas do not need a wdtten approval from the planning director provided they comply with the provisions of this chapter; Shall not be located within the front yard setback or the actual front yard unless proven by substantial evidence that no other location for the antenna is possible; Sufficient anti-climbing measures have been incorporated into the facility, as needed, to reduce potential for trespass and injury; and, In any histodc area, satellite dishes and parabolic antennas must be situated as close to the ground as possible to reduce visual impact without cornpromising their function. For a single family structure, no more than one (1) support structure for a citizens band or licensed amateur radio antenna and two (2) satellite dishes (or vertical radio or television antennas), provided that only one dish antenna is larger than one meter (39.4 inches) in diameter, are allowed. For an attached residential structure, no more than one meter (39 inches) in diameter dish is allowed per unit. 17.40.060 Non-Exempt Telecommunication Facilities and Antennas in Non-residential Zones Non-exempt facilities may be installed, erected, maintained and/or operated in any non- residential zoning district, except within recognized histodc districts, where such antennas are permitted under this title, without the need for a use permit or other entitlement. The following wireless communication facilities are permitted as accessory uses if in compliance with the raquiraments of this Section. Up to two vertical antennas that are less than fifteen (15) feet in height above the roof of a commercial or industrial building. Any satellite earth station antenna designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct-to-home satellite services and multi-channel multi-point distribution services, provided that such antenna is two meters (78 inches) or less in diameter. If the diameter of the antenna is 18 inches or less, the antenna may extend above the ridgeline of a roof only to a height that is reasonably necessary to ensure the reception of broadcast signals of an acceptable quality. If the diameter of the antenna exceeds 18 inches, but does not exceed 39.4 inches, then the antenna may not extend above the ridgeline of a roof unless it is screened from public view by an integrated architectural design feature only to a height that is reasonably necessary to ensure the reception of broadcast signals of an acceptable quality. C. The following requirements apply to all facilities described in this Section. The antenna is accessory to the primary use of the property and that the use of the property is not a telecommunications facility; F:'4:)epts%PLANNING%Ordinart.,es%ANTENNA%242PA97 CC1 .doc 14 3. 4. 5. 6. 17.40.070 A. Exempt antennas do not need a wdtten approval from the planning director provided they comply with the provisions of this chapter; Shall not be located in the front yard and street setbacks unless proven by substantial evidence that no other location for the antenna is possible; Surfsdent anti-climbing measures have been incorporated into the facility, as needed, to reduce potential for trespass and injury; Utility or accessory equipment must be located within a completely enclosed building or otherwise screened from view; and In any histodc area, satellite dishes and parabolic antennas must be situated as dose to the ground and screened from public view to reduce visual impact without cornpromising their function. Administrative Approval of Telecommunications Facilities and Antennas The planning director may administratively approve a development plan for any wireless communications facility or antenna in a commercial, industrial, public institutional, open space, or public park and recreation zoning distdct subject to administrative design review (i.e. an administrative development plan). The facilities and antennas that are subject to administrative design review are as follows: Any building or roof mounted antenna that extends above the top of the parepet wall by less than twelve (12) feet and is fully screened from public view. Antennas on pitched roof surfaces are not eligible for administrative design review. Three (3) or more vertical antennas, or any vertical antenna that extends more than fifteen (15) feet above the roof line of a commercial or industrial building. 3, Any dish antenna that is larger than two (2) meters in diameter. An increase in the height or size of a previously installed and approved antenna or structure by no more that twenty (20) percant of the odginal approval. The co-location of a new antenna onto a building where another antenna is located. The following requirements apply to all the facilities described in this Section. 1. All utility or accessory equipment must be screened from view; The screening matedal and antenna, if visible, shall be architecturally integrated into the building or strudure; and, No vadance or minor exception is required to approve the telecommunication facility or antenna. The planning director shall either approve the application within thirty (30) days of receiving a complete application or refer the application to either a director headng or the planning commission for consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting. F:~Depts~LANNING~Ordinances%ANTENNA%242PA97 CC1 ,doc 15 Telecommunication radiities and antennas that am described in paragraphs A and B above, shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of either Section 17.40.080 or 17.40.090, at the sole discretion of the planning director, whenever the following 1. A vadance or minor exception is necessary to approve the proposed telecommunication facility or antenna; and/or 17.40.080 A. The telecommunication facility or antenna is located in a zoning district not listed in this Section. Planning Director Approval of Telecommunication Facilities and Antennae Antennas that comply with the following cdteria are permitted in any residential zoning district subject to the requirements of a minor conditional use permit (i.e. a conditional use permit for an existing building). The planning director may act on the application or may refer the application the planning commission for its consideration at its next available scheduled meeting. Any citizens band or amateur radio antenna for a licensed amateur radio operator that has a maximum height of between thirty five (35) feet and fifty (50) feet above the ground surface. Any vertical antenna that is designed solely to receive television broadcast signals that if ground-mounted, is more than ten (10) feet; or if the antenna is building-mounted the height of the antenna exceeds ten (10) feet above the roof. Wereless communications facilities that comply with the following criteria are permitted in any commercial, industrial, public institutional, open space, or parks and recreation zoning districts subject to the requirements of a minor conditional use permit (i.e. a conditional use permit for an existing building). The planning director may act on the application or may refer the application the planning commission for its consideration at its next available scheduled meeting. Any building or roof mounted antenna that does not extend above the top of the parapet wall by more than twelve (12) feet above and that is screened from public view; including any antennas proposed to be located on pitched roof surfaces. Antennas mounted on other existing structures, such as water tanks, pump stations, utility poles, or ball field lighting. Not withstanding the above, antennas mounted on existing structures are not limited to commercial or industrial zones. The co-location a new antenna to an existing approved support structure without an increase in height. Additional antenna or dishes up to 4 feet in diameter, provided that the additional antenna or dishes do not exceed more than twenty five percent (25%) of the existing antennae or dishes in number, area or height. The following requirements apply to all the facilities described in this Section. 1. All utility or accessory equipment must be screened from view; and, F:%DeptS%PLANNING~DrdinanceS%ANTENNA~.42PA97 CC1 .doc 16 The screening material shall be architecturally integrated wilt the building, structure, or landscaping so as not to be recognizable as an antenna or accessory equipment structure. 17.40.090 Planning Commission Approval of Telecommunications Facilities and Antennas All olter wireless telecommunication facilities and antennas ltat are not specifically exempted from regulation or are described in Sections 17.40.050, 17.40.060, 17.40.070 and 17.40.080, including lte approval of a request for a multi-user site, as well as all monopoles and towers shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit by lte planning commission. Exceptions to lte requirements specified within ltis Chapter may be granted ltrough issuance of a conditional use permit by the planning commission. Such a permit may only be alpproved if lte planning commission finds, after receipt of substantial evidence, that failure to adhere to lte standard under consideration in each specific instance will not increase the visibility of the facility or adversely effect lte public health, safety or welfare. A conditional use permit authorizing lte establishment of a telecommunication facility or antenna may be reviewed whenever lte City determines that circumstances warrant the review. 17.40.100 Revocation of Development Plans and Conditional Use Permits The revocation of a development plan and conditional use permit for a telecommunication facility or antenna shall be undertaken in conformance wilt lte provisions of Section 17.03.080 of lte Temecula Municipal Code. In addition to the revocation findings set forth in Subsection 17.03.080.A., a development plan or conditional use permit for a telecommunication facility or antenna may also be revoked for any of the following reasons: A. The facility has failed to comply with any applicable Federal standards; The operation fails to comply wilt lte requirements of this chapter as ltey exist at lte time of permit renewal, The facility has not been upgreded to minimize its impacts (including aesltetics) on lte community to lte greatest extent permitted by the technology ltat exists at lte time of renewal; The permittee has failed to supply assurances acceptable to lte planning director ltat the facility will be brought into compliance within one hundred twenty (120) days, or E. The facility has not been propedy maintained. 17.40.110 General Requirements - Location and Facility Separation All wireless telecommunication facilities shall be located so as to minimize their visibility and the number of separate and distinct facilities. To ltis end all of lte following measures shall be implemented for all telecommunications facilities and antennas, except exempt facilities, shall comply wilt the following locations requirements: No telecommunication facility or antenna that is readily visible from off-site shall be installed on a site ltat is not already developed with telecommunication facilities or other F:%Dep~LANNING%OrdinanCes%ANTENNA%242pA07 CC1 .doc 17 public or quasi-public uses unless it blends with the surrounding existing natural and man-made environment in such a manner so as to be effectively unnoticeable or technical evidence acceptable to the approval authority is submitted showing a clear need for this facility and the infeasibility of co-locating it on another antenna or establishing a multi-user site. The antenna shall be located outside all yard and street sethacks specified in the zoning district in which the antenna is to be located unless technical evidence acceptable to the planning director or planning commission, as appropriate, is submitted showing that this is the only technically feasible location for this facility. Telecommunication facilities and antennas shall not be located closer than seventy-five (75) feet from any residential dwelling unit, unless technical evidence acceptable to the approval authority is submitted showing that this is the only technically feasible location for this facility or unless permitted pursuant to an agreement described in Section 17.40.220. No telecommunication facility or antenna that is readily visible from off-site shall be installed closer than one thousand (1000) feet from another readily visible telecommunication facility or antenna unless it is a co-located facility, is situated on a multiple-user site, or technical evidence acceptable to the planning director is submitted showing a clear need for this facility and the infeasibility of placing the antenna in a co- located or multi-user site. This provision does not apply to architecturally integrated building-mounted facilities or to facilities permitted pursuant to an agreement described in Section 17.40.220. No new telecommunication facility or antenna that exceeds fifteen (15) feet in height shall be installed on an exposed prominent ridgeline greater than one thousand three hundred and fifty (1350) feet above mean sea level, unless it blends with the surrounding existing natural and man-made environment in such a manner as to be effectively unnoticeable and a finding is made that no other location is technically feasible. 17.40.120 General Requirements - Basic Tower and Building Design All wireless telecommunication facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be designed to blend into the surrounding environment to the greatest extent feasible. To this end all the following measures shall be implemented: Telecommunicatien towers taller than thirty-five (35) feet shall be monopoles except where satisfactory evidence is submitted to the approval authority that a self-supporting tower is required to provide the height and/or capacity necessary for the proposed telecommunication use to minimize the need for screening from adjacent properties. B= All buildings, poles, towers, antenna supports, antennas, and other components of each telecommunications site shall be treated with non-reflective colors to offer concealment. Galvanized metal or gray paint is the preferred color. C= Satellite dishes other than microwave dishes shall be of mesh construction, except where technical evidence is acceptable to the planning director or planning commission, as appropriate, is submitted showing that this is infeasible. Telecommunication support facilities (i.e., vaults, equipment rooms, utilities, and equipment enclosures) in the public right-of-way shall be constructed out of non- reflective materials (visible extedor surfaces only) and shall be placed in underground F:~DeptS~PLANNING~)rdlnanCe~ANTENNA~242PA97 CC1 .doc 18 vaults to all extent possible. Telecommunication support facilities in areas of high visibility shall be sited below the ridgeline or designed, where possible, to minimize their profile (i.e., placed underground, depressed, or located behind herins). Freestanding above ground telecommunication support facilities shall be no taller than one stow (about fifteen feet) in height and shall be constructed to look like a building or fadlity typically found in the area. Telecommunicetion fadlities shall insure that sufficient anti-climbing measures have been incorporated into the facility, as needed, to reduce potential for trespass and injury. 17.40.130 General Requirements - Airports and Helipads All wireless telecommunication facilities and antennas located at or near any airport or heftpad shall comply with the following measures: No telecommunication facility or antenna shall be installed within the safety zone of any airport or any heftpad unless the Airport Land Use Commission indicates that it will not adversely affect the operation of the airport or hellpad. No telecommunication facility or antenna shall be installed at a location where special painting or lighting will be required by the FAA regulations unless technical evidence acceptable to the planning director or planning commission, as appropriate, is submitted showing that this is the only technically feasible location for this facility. Where tower lighting is required, it shall be shielded or directed to the greatest extent possible in such a manner as to minimize the amount of light that fails onto nearby propedies, particularly rasidencas. 17.40.140 General Requirements - Co-located and Multiple-user Facilities The co-location of wireless telecommunication antennas is encouraged. The establishment of multiple-user fadlities may be approved if the creation of a multiple-user site will reduce the overall impacts on the community. All co-located and multiple-user telecommunication facilities shall be designed to promote facility and site shadng. Telecommunication towers and necessary appurtenances, including but not limited to, parking areas, access roads, utilities and equipment buildings shall be shared by site users to minimize the impacts on the community. Fadlities that are not proposed to be co-located with another telecommunication facility or antenna shall provide a wdtten explanation why the subject facility is not a candidate for co-location. Co-location of facilities is not requirad if, at the sole discration of the planning director, it may compromise proprietary data, equipment or technology. The facility shall make available unutilized space for co-location of other tetecommunication facilities, including space for these entities providing similar. competing services. A good faith effort in achieving co-location shall be required of the host entity. Requests for utilization of facility space and responses to such requests shall be made in a timely manner and in writing and copies shall be provided to the planning director. F:%Depta%PLANNING~Ordinances%ANTENNA%242PA97 CCI ,doc 19 Co-location is not required in cases where the addition of the new service or facilities would cause quality of service impairment to the existing tadlity or if it becomes necessary for the host to go off-line for a significant pedod of time. Approval for the establishment of fadlities improved with an existing microwave bend or other public service use or fadlity, which creates interference or interference is antidpated as a result of said establishment of additional facilities, shall include provisions for the relocation of said existing public use fadlities. All costs assodated with said relocation shall be borne by the applicant for the additional facilities. 17.40.150 General Requirements - Vegetation Protection and Facility Screening All wireless telecommunications facilities and antennas shall be installed in such a manner so as to maintain and enhance existing native and/or landscaped vegetation to screen the facility, where necessary. The following measures shall apply to all telecommunication facilities, except exempt fadlities. If a telecommunication facility requires the installation of landscaping for screening or erosion control, a landscape plan shall be submitted. The Plan shall indicate all existing vegetation, identify landscaping that is to be retained on the site and any additional vegetation that is needed to satisfactorily screen the facility from adjacent land uses and public view areas. All existing trees larger than four (4) inches in diameter shall be identified in the landscape plan with indication of species type, the diameter at a height of four and one-haft (4'~) feet, and whether it is to be retained or removed with project development. The landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the appropriate use permit process; Existing trees and other screening vegetation in the vicinity of the facility and along the access roads and power/telecommunication line routes involved shall be protected from damage, both dudng the construction pedod and thereafter. If determined to be necessary by the planning director, a Tree Protection Plan for non-eucalyptus heritage trees, oak trees, or other trees of local importance, shall be submitted with building permit or improvement plan. This Plan shall be prepared by a certified arbodst and shall specify the measures required to protect trees during project construction; Grading, cuttingffilling, and the storage/parking of equipment/vehicles shall be prohibited in areas with native or landscaped plants to protect areas within the ddp lines of any tree that is required to be preserved. Such areas shall be fenced to the satisfaction of the planning director. Trash, debds, or spoil shall not be placed within these fences nor shall the fences henceforth be opened or moved until the project is complete and wdtten approval to take the fences down has been received from the planning director; and All underground lines shall be routed such that a minimum amount of damage is done to tree root systems; All areas disturbed dudng project construction other than the access road and parking areas shall be replanted with vegetation compatible with the vegetation in the surrounding area (e.g., ornamental shrubs or natural brush, depending upon the drcumstances) to the satisfaction of the planning director; Any existing trees or significant vegetation, on the facilities site or along the affected access area that die shall be replaced with native trees and vegetation of e size and species acceptable to the planning director; and F:%Dep{s%PLANNING%Ordinancee%ANTENNA%242pA97 CC1 .doc 20 No actions shaft be taken subsequent to project completion with respect to the vegetation present that would increase the visibility of the facility itself or the access road and power/telecommunication lines serving it. 17.40.160 General Requirements - Lighting All wireless telecommunication facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be unlit except for a manually-operated or motion-detector controlled light above the equipment shed door shall be kept off except when personnel are actually present at night. This requirement is not intended to address intedor structure lighting. 17.40.170 General Requirements - Roads and Parking All wireless telecommunication facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be served by the minimum roads and parking areas necessary to accommodate service vehicles. Existing roads shall be used for access, whenever possible, and be upgraded the minimum amount necessary to meet standards specified by the Fire Chief and Director of Public Works. Any new roads or parking areas built shall, whenever feasible, be shared with subsequent telecommunication facilities and/or other permitted uses. Existing off site parking areas shall be used, whenever possible. 17.40.180 General Requirements - Environmental Resource Protection All wireless telecommunicetion facilities shall be sited so as to minimize the effect on environmental resources, To that end the following measures shall be implemented for all telecommunication fadlities, except exempt facilities: A. Natural vegetation and topography shall be retained to the extent feasible. No telecommunicetions facility or related improvements including but not limited to access roads and power lines shall be sited so as to create a significant threat to the health or survival of rare, threatened or endangered plant or animal species. Telecommunication facilities or related improvements shall not be sited such that their construction will damage an archaeological site or have an adverse effect on the histodc character of a histodc feature or site. The facility shall comply with all applicable City Floodplain, Floodway and Storm Drainage and Erosion Control regulations. Drainage, erosion, and sediment controls shall be required as necessary to avoid soil erosion and seqimentation of waterways, Structures and roads on slopes of ten (10) percent or greater shall be avoided where practical. Erosion control measures shall be incorporated for any proposed facility that involves grading or construction near a waterway or on lands with slopes over ten (10) percent. Potential adverse environmental and public use impacts that might result from project related grading or road construction shall be minimized; 17.40.190 General Requirements - Noise and Traffic All wireless telecommunicetion facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be constructed and operated in such a manner as to minimize the amount of disruption imposed on the residents of immediately adjacent homes and the users of adjacent recreational facilities. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DeptS%PLANNING%Ordinances~ANTENN/2~42PA97 CC1 .doc Backup generators shall only be operated dudng power outages and for testing and maintenance purposes. If the facility is located within one hundred (100) feet of a residential dwelling unit, noise attenuation measures shall be included to reduce exterior noise levels to at least a 65 dB CNEL at the property line and an intedor noise levels to at least 45 dB CNEL. Routine testing and maintenance shall only take place on non- holiday weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 17.40.200 General Requirements -Visual Compatibility All wireless talecommunication tsciiities shall be sited so as to be visually compatible with their surroundings. To that end the following measures shall be implemented for all telecemmunicetion facilities, except exempt facilities: Facility structures and equipment shall be located, designed and screened to blend with the existing natural or built surroundings so as to reduce visual impacts to the extent feasible considering the technological requirements of the proposed telecommunicetion service and the need to be compatible with neighboring residences and the character of the community. The facility shall be designed to blend with any existing supporting structure shall not substantially alter the character of the structure or local area. Following the assembly and installation of the facility, all waste and debris shall be removed and disposed of in a lawful manner. 17.40.210 Standard Agreements Required A maintenance/facility ramoval agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of this section will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant shall be submitted to the planning director pdor to approval of the building permit or other entitlement for use authodzing the establishment or modification of any telecommunicetions fadlity which indudas any telecommunicetion tower, a new building or equipment enclosure that in aggregate are larger than three hundred (300) square feet, more than throe (3) satellite dishes of any size, or a satellite dish larger than two (2) meters in diameter. The agreement shall bind the applicant and the applicant's successors-in-interest to propedy maintain the extedor appearance of and ultimately removal of the facility in compliance with the provisions of this chapter and any conditions of approval. It shall further find them to pay all costs for monitoring compliance with, and enforcement of, the agreement and to reimburse the City for all costs incurred to perform any work required of the applicant by this agreement that the applicant fails to perform. It shall also specifically authorize the City and/or its agents to enter onto the property and undertake said work so long as the director has first provided the applicant the following written notices: An initial compliance request identifying the work needed to comply with the agreement and providing the applicant at least thirty (30) calendar days to complete it; A follow-up notice of default specifying the applicant's failure to comply with the work within the time padod specified and indicating the city's intent to commence the required working within ten (10) working days; and \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DeI~s',PLANNING'~3rdinanCes~ANTENN/iB242PA97 CCI .doc The applicant has not filed an appeal pursuant to Section 17.03.090. If an appeal is filed, the City shall be authorized to enter the property and perform the necessary work if the appeal is dismissed or final action is taken in favor of the City; All costs incurred by the City to undertake any work required to be performed by the applicant pursuant to the agreement referred to in this section including, but not limited to, administrative and job supervision costs, shall be borne solely by the applicant. The applicant shall deposit wibhin ten (10) working days of wdtten request therefor such costs as the City reasonably estimates or has actually incurred to complete such work. VVhen estimates are employed, additional moneys shall be deposited as needed within ten (10) working days of demand to cover actual costs. The agreement shall specifically require the applicant to immediately cease operation of the telecommunicetion facility involved if the applicant fails to pay the moneys demanded within ten (10) working days. It shall further require that operation remain suspended until such costs are paid in full. Standard agreements shall include, but not be limited to, the following stipulations agreed to by the applicant: Telecemmunication facilities provider shall be strictly libel for any and all sudden and accidental pollution and gradual pollution resulting from their use within the City of Temecula. This liability shall include cleanup, intentional injury or damage to persons or property. Additionally, telecommunication facilities lessors shall be responsible for any sanctions, fines, or other monetary costs imposed as a result of the release of pollutants from their operations. Pollutants means any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, include smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, chemicals, electromagnetic waves and waste. Waste includes materials to be recycled, recenditioned or reclaimed. The telecemmunication facility provider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers. and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the project when such claim or action is brought within the time pedod provided for in applicable State and/or local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the provider(s) of any such claim, action or proceeding. The City shall have the option of coordinating in the defense. Nothing contained in this stipulation shall prohibit the City from participating in a defense of any claim action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attomey's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith. 17.40.220 Agreement for Facilities on City Owned Property or Rights of Way No approval granted hereunder shall be effective until the applicant and the City have executed a written agreement establishing the particular terms and provisions under which the dght to occupy the City owned property or dght-of-way shall be used or maintained. 17.40.230 Nonexclusive Grant No approval granted under this Chapter shall confer any exclusive dght, privilege, license or franchise to occupy or use the public ways of the City for delivery of telecommunicetions services or any other purposes. Further, no approval shall be construed as any warranty of title. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI~epts~LANNING\Ordinances%ANTENN/2~42PA97 CC1 .doc 17.40.240 Temporary Facilities The planning director may approve, for a period of up to one hundred twenty (120) days, a temporary antenna facility to provide service while an approved antenna facility is being fabricated or when an existing antenna has been damaged or destroyed. A pre-permanent temporary facility may only be approved after the approval authority has approved or conditionally approved an application for a wireless telecommunications antenna and the project proponent has signed and returned a copy of the conditions of approval to the planning director. The planning director shall approve the actual term, location, and design of the temporary facility consistent with the goals and intent of this Chapter. 17.40.250 Nonconforming Facilities and Antennas Any antenna constructed in violation of this chapter, or in violation of any pdor ordinance or regulation, is subject to immediate abatement. Any antenna that is lawfully constructed pdor to the effective date of this chapter that does not comply with the perforrnanca standards and requirements of this chapter, shall be deemed a nonconforming use and will be subject to the provisions of Section 17.03.070.' Section 3. The following items are hereby added in the appropriate alphabetical locations of Chapter 17.34 of the Temecula Municipal Cede: "Antenna" means any system of wires, poles, rods, reflecting discs, or similar devices used for the transmission or reception of electromagnetic waves when such system is either external to or attached to the exterior of a structure. Antennas shall include devices having active elements extending in any direction, and directional beam-type arrays having elements carried by and disposed from a generally horizontal boom that may be mounted upon and rotated through a vertical mast or tower interconnecting the boom and antenna support, all of which elements are deemed to be a part of the antenna. Antennas shall include cellular on wheels (COWs) and cellular on light trucks (COLTs) facilities; as well as dispatch carriers for Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) services and Enhanced SMR (ESMR) "Antenna - Building Mounted" means any antenna, other than an antenna with its supports resting on the ground, directly attached or affixed to a building, tank, tower, or structure other than a telecommunication tower. "Antenna ~ Directional" (also known as a "panel" antenna) transmits and/or receives radio frequency signals in a directional paftem of less than 360 degrees. "Antenna - Ground Mounted" means any antenna with its base, single or multiple posts, placed directly on the ground or a mast less than 10 feet tell and 6 inches in diameter. "Antenna - Vertical" means a vertical type antenna without horizontal cross- sections greater than three-quarters of an inch in diameter. B. "Co-location" - see telecommunication facility - co-located. "Monopole" is a wireless communication facility that consists of a vertical unguyed structure, erected on the ground to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. \\TEMEC~FS101%VOL1~eptS%PLANNING~Ordinances%ANTENN/2~42PA97 CC1 .doc "NIER" means non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (i.e,, electromagnetic radiation primarily in the visible, infrared, and radio frequency portions of the electromagnetic spectrum). "Public Service Use Facility" means a use operated or used by a public body or public utility in connection with any of the following services: water, waste water management, public education, parks and recreation, fire and police protection, solid waste management, transportation or utilities. "Public Way" means and includes all public streets and utility easements, now and hereafter owned by the City, but only to the extent of the City's dght, title, interest or authority to grant a license to occupy and use such streets and easements for telecommunications facilities and antennas. "Quasi-Public Use" means a use serving the public at large, and operated by a pdvate entity under a franchise or other similar governmental authorization, designed to promote the interests of the general public or operated by a recognized civic organization for the benefit of the general public. "Readily Visible" means an object that stands out as a prominent feature of the landscape when viewed with the naked eye. "Satellite earth station antenna" means a parabolic or dish-shaped antenna or other apparatus or device that is designed for the puq~ose of receiving radio or television broadcast signals. "Telecommunication Facility" means a facility that transmits and/or receives electromagnetic signals. It includes antennas, microwave dishes, horns, and other types of equipment for the transmission or receipt of such signals, telecommunication towers or similar structures supporting said equipment, equipment buildings, parking area, and other accessory development. "Telecommunications Facility - Exempt" include. but are not limited to, the following A single ground or building mounted receive-only radio or television antenna, A ground or building mounted citizens band radio antenna including any mast, A ground, building, or tower mounted antenna operated by a federally licensed amateur radio operator as part of the Amateur Radio Service that is less than thirty five (35) feet in height, A ground or building mounted receive only radio or television satellite dish antenna, which does not exceed one meter (39.4 inches) in diameter, Mobile services providing public information coverage of news events of a temporary nature, Hand held devices such as cell phones, business-band mobile radios, walkie-talkies, cordless telephones, garage door openere and similar devices as determined by the planning director, and City government owned and operated receive and/or transmit telemetry station antennas for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems for water, flood alert, traffic control devices and signals, storm \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLt%Dep{s~LANNING%OrdinanCeS%ANTENN/~5:42PA97 CC1 ,doc water, pump stations and/or irrigation systems. 2. "Telecommunication Facility - Co-Located" means a telecommunication facility comprised of a single telecommunication tower or building supporting one or more antennas, dishes, or similar devices owned or used by more than one public or pdvate entity. 3. "Telecommunication Facility - Multiple User" means a telecommunication fadlity comprised of multiple towers or buildings supporting one or more antennas owned or used by more than one public or pdvate entity, excluding research and development industries with antennas to serve internal uses only. "Inhabited area" means any residence, any other structure regularly occupied by people, or any outdoor area used by people on a regular basis. Section 4. Chapter 17.06 of the Temecula Munidpal Code is hereby amended as described below. A. Section 17.06.050.D.7 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "7. Antennas. Are subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40." B. The line for Antennas in Table 17.06.050.D of the Temecula Municipal Cede is hereby amended to read as follows: Accessory Front ! Rear Structure Antennas Not permitted Side Minimum Distance to Front Property Line Minimum Distance to Rear Property Line Minimum Distance to Side Prop. e..rty Lin_e' 5ft. Section 5. Chapter 17.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below. follows: Table 17.08.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as Description of Use NC CC HT SC PO BP Communications and microwave installations2 LI B. Footnote No. 2 of Table 17.08.030 is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17,40 of the Temecula Municipal Code." Section 6. Chapter 17.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below. A. The following use is hereby added to Table 17.12.030 of the Temecula Municipal Cede and shall read as follows: \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%Depts~PLANNING~)rdinances%ANTENN/Ee42pA97 CC1 ,doc B. Footnote No. I is hereby added to Table 17.12,030 to read as follows: "1. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code." Section 7. Chapter 17.14 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below. A. The following use is hereby added to Table 17.14.030 of the Temecula Municipal Cede and shell read as follows: Schedule of Uses Communications and microwave installations B. The Footnote at the bottom of Table 17,14,030 is hereby amended to read as follows: "1. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code in the P-R and OS zones." Section 8, The moratorium on the placement of new antennas contained in Ordinance 99-17 is hereby repealed. Section 9. Sevembilitv. The City Coundl hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severnhie and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining pads of this Ordinance. Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula day of ,2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts%PLANNING~Drdinances~ANTENN/L~42pA97 CC1 I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Courtall on the __ day of ,2000, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula on the day of ,2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk \~TEMEC_FS101\VOLI%DepI~PLANNING\Ord~nances%ANTENN/2~42PA97 CC1 .doc ATTACHMENTNO. 3 PROPOSED ORDINANCE \~TEMEC_FS101\VOL1'{)epts~PLANNING%Ordtnances%ANTENN/~E42PA97 CCl.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 00-.__ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission, on March 17, 2000, and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, on May 23, 2000, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the Municipal Code of the City of Temecuta. Section 2. Chapter 17.40 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 17.40 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND ANTENNA ORDINANCE 17.40.010 Purpose The purpose and intent of this chapter is to provide a uniform and comprehensive set of standards for the installation and maintenance of telecommunicetion facilities and antennas to achieve the goals, objectives and policies of the Temecula General Plan. It is furthermore intended that, to the extent permitted by law, the City shall apply these regulations to specifically accomplish the following: A. Protect and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Temecula; Protect the visual character of the City from the potential adverse effects of telecommunication facility development and antenna installation by maintaining architectural and structural integrity and preventing unsightly facilities; Ce Insure against the creation of visual blight within or along the City's scenic corridor and ndgelines; Retain local responsibility for and control over the use of public right-of-way to protect citizens and enhance the quality of their lives; Protect the inhabitants of Temecula, to the extent permitted by law, from the possible adverse health effects associated with exposure to high levels of NIER (non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation); F. Protect environmental resources in and around Temecula; G. Promote the planned and managed development of telecommunications infrastructure; \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%Depts~PLANNING~OrdinanGes%ANTENN~(Z42PA97 CC1 .do¢ Promote fair and effective telecommunication services and insure that a broad range of competitive telecommunications services with high quality telecemmunications infrastructure are available to serve the community; Create and preserve telecommunication facilities that will serve as an important and effective part of Temecula's emergency response network; Establish simplified and shortened approval processes for obtaining permits to install and operate telecommunication facilities while at the same time protecting the legitimate interests of Temecula citizens to the maximum extent possible; K. Ensure area access to satellite telecommunications services; and L. Enceurege the co-location of new telecommunication antennas. Furthermore, it is the stated goal of the City of Temecula that these local restrictions and regulations shall not preclude the reception of acceptable signal quality, create an unreasonable delay, prevent, or increase the cost of installing, maintaining and using these facilities. It is also the stated intent of this Chapter to provide a public forum to insure a balance between pubtic concerns and pdvate interests in establishing telecommunicetion and related facilities. 17.40.020 General Requirements for all Telecommunication Facilities and Antennas No non-exempt tslecommunication facility or antenna shall be constructed or operated without the appropdata City entitlement. All non-exempt telecommunication facilities and antennas shall meet the following general requirements and standards. Be consistent with applicable General Plan Goals, Objectives, Programs and Policies, Specific Plan. Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Standards, Design Guidelines, and the permit requirements of any agency which has jurisdiction over the project; Meet all the requirements established by the other chapters of the Temecula Munidpal Code and Temecula Development Cede that are not in conflict with the requirements contained in this chapter; C. Comply with all applicable FCC rules, regulations, and standards; No antenna, antenna array, or wireless telecommunications antenna arrays shall be located within any recognized local or national histodc district, or on a structure recognized as a local or national historic landmark, unless screening has been provided to completely camouflage the facility; Comply with the Uniform Building Code, National Electdc Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code. and Uniform Fire Code, where applicable; Comply with applicable Airport land use compatibility criteria/policies and Federal Aviation Administration regulations; Antennas shall be constructed of metal or other non-~ammable material, unless specifically approved by the City to be otherwise; Shall not be installed in any location where it could impede normal vehicular or pedestrian circulation, ingress to, or egress from any building, structure, or parking facility; \\TEMEC_FSt 01 \VO L1 ~DeI~b~PLANNING\(:){dinanceE~ANTEN N/I~42PA97 CC 1 .d~¢ I. Maintain applicable easements or similar restrictions on the subject property; All setbacks shall be measured from the base of the tower or structure to the applicable property line or structure end shall not be situated between the pdmary building on the parcel and any public or pdvate street adjoining the parcel, so as to cream a negative visual impact; Maintain a secudty program when determined to be necessary by, and subject to the review end approval of, the Temecula Police Department that will prevent unauthorized access and vandalism; Satellite earth station antennas (dishes and parabolic antennas) larger than 1 meter in diameter shall be situated as dose to the ground as possible to reduce visual impact without cornpromising their function; All references to different zones and zoning districts shall also be construed to mean the planning areas in an approved Specific Plan; Shall not contain or add advertising or signs to telecommunicetions facilities and antennas. Not withstanding the previous, the co-location of telecommunications antennas onto legally established sign structures is not prohibited. The location of wireless telecommunicetion antennas shall be considered on a case by case basis where the intent of the suppod structure is for advertising purposes only and the structure complies with all applicable sign ordinance requirements; and Not withstanding the provisions of Subsection N above, all freestending telecommunication sites shall provide unlight identification signage of not more than three (3) square feet in size. The sign shall indicate the name of the company operating the facility and shall provide a phone number to be called in an emergency. The sign should be located near the entrance to the support facility. 17.40.025 Publicly Owned Property The provisions of this Chapter shall also apply to the placement of non-exempt wireless telecommunicetion facilities and antennas on publicly owned properly within the City of Temecula. 17.40.030 Application Requirements All applications for non-exempt telecommunications facilities and antennas shall comply with the submittal requirements authorized by Section 17.03.030. In addition, other specific supplemental requirements described in this Section may also be required. The derision to require additional information with as part of an application shall be made by, and be at the sole discretion of, the planning director. A. Examples of supplemental project information that may be required include the following: 1. Service area and network maps; Alternative site analysis and alternative facility designs. The analysis shall identify all reasonable, technically feasible, alternative locations and/or facilities which could provide the proposed telecommunication service. The analysis shall address the potential for co-location at an existing or a new site and the potential to locate facilities as close as possible to the intended service area. It shall also \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLt%DePts~oLANNING~3fdinan~es%ANTENN,I~42PA97 CC1 ,doc explain the rationale for selection of the proposed site in view of the relative rnedts of any of the feasible alternatives. The intention of the alternatives analysis is to present alternative strategies which would minimize the number, size, and adverse environmental impacts of facilities necessary to provide the needed services to the City and surrounding rural and urban areas; Visual impact analyses or demonstrations (including mock-ups and/or photomontages). Consideration shall be given to views from public areas as well as from pdvate residences. The analysis shall be "worst case" and shall assess the cumulative impacts of the proposed facility and other existing and foreseeable telecemmunicetion facilities in the area, and shall identify and include all feasible mitigation measures consistent with the technological requirements of the proposed telecemmunication service; and Information on the location of other nearby telecommunication facilities within the city limits of Temecula and within one mile of the proposed facility; Special design studies of the proposed facilities where findings of particular sensitivity will have to be made (e.g. proximity to historic or aesthetically significant structures, views and/or community facility.) The planning director is explicitly authorized at his/her discretion to employ on behalf of the City an independent technicel expert to review any submitted suppiementel or technical materials or provide technical knowledge to the City. The technical export shall be agreeable to beth the City and the service provider. The applicant shall pay all the costs of said review, including any administrative costs incurred by the City. Any propdetary information that is disclosed to the City or any expert hired shall be located in a separate private file, shall remain confidential, and shall not be disclosed to any third party. 17.40.040 Determination of Height The height of the support structure must be the minimum necessary to provide the required coverage. Antenna and structure heights are determined in the following manner. For ground mounted antennas: The height of the antenna structure shall he measured from the natural undisturbed ground surface below the center of the base of the tower to the top of the tower or from the top of the highest antenna or piece of equipment attached thereto, whichever is greater. For building mounted antennas: The height of the antenna structure shall be measured from the top of the building roof on which the antenna is mounted to the top of the antenna or screening structure, whichever is higher. The height of antenna structures that are attached to a building shall be measured from the top of the building roof. In the case of "crank-up" or other similar towers, whose height can be adjusted, the height of the tower shall be considered the maximum height to which it is capable of being raised. \\TEMEC_FSlOl\VOLl%Depts'.,PLANNING\Ordinances%ANTENN,Q~42PA97 CC1 .doc 17.40.050 Non-Exempt Telecommunication Facilities and Antennas in Residential Zones Non-exempt facilities may be installed, erected, maintained and/or operated in any residential zoning district, except within recognized histodc districts, where such antennas are permitted under this title, without the need for a use permit or other entitlement. The following wireless communication facilities are permitted as accessory uses if in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Any satellite earth station antenna designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct-to-home satellite services and multi-channel multi-point distribution services, provided that such antenna is one meter (39.4 inches) or less in diameter. If the diameter of the antenna is 18 inches or less, the antenna may extend above the ridgeline of a roof only to a height that is reasonably necessary to ensure the reception of broadcast signals of an acceptable quality. If the diameter of the antenna exceeds 18 inches, but does not exceed 39 inches, then the antenna may not extend above the ridgeline of a roof. Any satellite earth station antenna that is designed to be a receive only dish antenna that is less than ten and one-half (10.5) feet in diameter. Provided that the top the antenna does not extend more than 12 feet above the ground. Ce Any vertical antenna that is designed solely to receive television broadcast signals. Such an antenna, if ground-mounted, shall be no more than (10) feet in height. If the antenna is building-mountad the height of the antenna may not exceed more than ten (10) feet above the roof. Any dtizens bend or amateur radio antenna for a licensed amateur radio operator provided that the maximum height of the antenna does not exceed thidy five (35) feet above the ground surface. E. The following requirements apply to all facilities described in this Section. The antenna is accessory to the pdmary use of the property and that the use of the property is not a telecommunications facility; Exempt antennas do not need a written approval from the planning director provided they comply with the provisions of this chapteF, Shall not be located within the front yard setback or the actual front yard unless proven by substantial evidence that no other location for the antenna is possible; Suffident anti-climbing measures have been incorporated into the facility, as needed, to reduce potential for trespass and injury; and, In any histodc area, satellite dishes and parabolic antennas must be situated as dose to the ground as possible to reduce visual impact without compromising their function. For a single family structure, no more than one (1) support structure for a citizens band or licensed amateur radio antenna and two (2) satellite dishes (or vertical radio or television antennas), provided that only one dish antenna is larger than one meter (39.4 \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts%PLANNING\OrdinanCeS%ANTENNAi~42PA97 CC1 .d~x; inches) in diameter, am allowed. For an attached residential structure, no more than one meter (39 inches) in diameter dish is allowed per unit. Non-Exempt Telecommunication Facilities and Antennas in Non-residential Zones Non-exempt facilities may be installed, erected, maintained and/or operated in any non- residential zoning district, except within recognized histodc districts, where such antennas are permitted under this title, without the need for a use permit or other entitlement. The following wireless communication facilities are permitted as accessory uses if in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Up to two vertical antennas that are less than fifteen (15) feet in height above the roof of a commercial or industrial building. Any satellite earth station antenna designed to receive direct breadcast satellite service, including direct-to-home satellite services and multi-channel multi-point distribution services, provided that such antenna is two meters (78 inches) or less in diameter. If the diameter of the antenna is 18 inches or less, the antenna may extend above the ddgeline of a roof only to a height that is reasonably necessary to ensure the reception of broadcast signals of an acceptable quality. If the diameter of the antenna exceeds 18 inches, but does not exceed 39.4 inches, then the antenna may not extend above the ridgeline of a roof unless it is screened from public view by an integrated architectural design feature only to a height that is reasonably necessary to ensure the reception of broadcast signals of an acceptable quality. C. The following requirements apply to all facilities described in this Section. The antenna is accessory to the primary use of the property and that the use of the property is not a telecommunications facility; Exempt antennas do not need a written approval from the planning director provided they comply with the provisions of this chapter; Shall not be located in the front yard and street setbacks unless proven by substantial evidence that no other location for the antenna is possible; Sufficient anti-climbing measures have been incorporated into the facility, as needed, to reduce potential for trespass and injury; Utility or accessory equipment must be located within a completely enclosed building or otherwise screened from view; and In any histodc area, satellite dishes and parabolic antennas must be situated as close to the ground and screened from public view to reduce visual impact without compromising their function. 17.40.070 Administrative Approval of Telecommunications Facilities and Antennas The planning director may administratively approve a development plan for any wireless communications facility or antenna in a commercial, industrial, public institutional, open space, or public park and recreation zoning distdct subject to administrative design ~TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~:)rdinances~ANTENN~42PA97 CCl.doc review (i.e. an administrative development plan). The facilities and antennas that are subject to administrative design review am as follows: Any building or roof mounted antenna that extends above the top of the parepet wall by less than twelve (12) feet and is fully screened from public view. Antennas on pitched roof surfaces are not eligible for administrative design review. Three (3) or more vertical antennas, or any vertical antenna that extends more than fifteen (15) feet above the roof line of a commercial or industrial building. 3. Any dish antenna that is larger than two (2) meters in diameter. An increase in the height or size of a previously installed and approved antenna or structure by no more that twenty (20) percent of the original approval. C. The co-location of a new antenna onto a building where another antenna is located. D. The following requirements apply to all the facilities described in this Section. 1. All utility or accessory equipment must be screened from view; The screening matedal and antenna, if visible, shall be architecturally integrated into the building or structure; and, No vadance or minor exception is required to approve the telecemmunication facility or antenna. The planning director shall either approve the application within thirty (30) days of receiving a complete application or refer the application to either a director hearing or the planning commission for consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Telecommunicetion facilities and antennas that are descdbed in paragraphs A and B above, shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of either Section 17.40.080 or 17.40.090, at the sole discretion of the planning director, whenever the following occurs: 1. A vadance or minor exception is necessary to approve the proposed telecommunication facility or antenna; and/or The telecommunication facility or antenna is located in a zoning district not listed in this Section. 17.40.080 Planning Director Approval of Telecommunication Facilities and Antennae Antennas that comply with the following criteria are permitted in any residential zoning district subject to the requirements of a minor conditional use permit (i.e. a conditional use permit for an existing building). The planning director may act on the application or may refer the application the planning commission for its consideration at its next available scheduled meeting. Any citizens band or amateur radio antenna for a licensed amateur radio operator that has a maximum height of between thirty five (35) feet and fifty (50) feet above the ground surface. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~ept$~LANNING%OrdinanCeS%ANTENN,le42pA97 CC1 .doc Any vertical antenna that is designed solely to receive television broadcast signals that if ground-mounted, is more than ten (10) feet; or if the antenna is building-mounted the height of the antenna exceeds ten (10) feet above the roof. W'lreless communications radiities that comply with the following cdteda are permitted in any corninertial, industrial, public institutional, open space, or parks and recreation zoning districts subject to the requirements of a minor conditional use permit (i.e. a conditional use permit for an existing building). The planning director may act on the application or may refer the application the planning commission for its consideration at its next available scheduled meeting. Any building or roof mounted antenna that does not extend above the top of the parapet wall by more than twelve (12) feet above and that is screened from public view; including any antennas proposed to be located on pitched roof surfaces. Antennas mounted on other existing structures, such as water tanks, pump stations, utility poles, or bell field lighting. Not withstanding the above, antennas mounted on existing structures are not limited to commemial or industrial zones. The co-location a new antenna to an existing approved support structure without an increase in height. Additional antenna or dishes up to 4 feet in diameter, provided that the additional antenna or dishes do not exceed more than twenty five percent (25%) of the existing antennae or dishes in number, area or height. D. The following requirements apply to all the facilities described in this Section. 1. All utility or accessory equipment must be screened from view; and, The screening matedal shall be amhitecturally integrated with the building, structure, or landscaping so as not to be recognizable as an antenna or accessory equipment structure. 17.40.090 Planning Commission Approval of Telecommunications Facilities and Antennas All other wireless telecommunicetion facilities and antennas that are not spedtically exempted from regulation or are described in Sections 17.40.050, 17.40.060, 17.40.070 and 17.40.080, including the approval of a request for a multi-user site, as well as all monopoles and towers shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit by the planning commission. Exceptions to the requirements specified within this Chapter may be granted through issuance of a conditional use permit by the planning commission. Such a permit may only be approved if the planning commission finds, after receipt of substantial evidence, that failure to adhere to the standard under consideration in each specific instance will not increase the visibility of the facility or adversely effect the public health, safety or welfare. A conditional use permit authorizing the establishment of a telecommunication facility or antenna may be reviewed whenever the City determines that circumstances warrant the review. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl%Depts~LANNINGM3rdinances~ANTENN,t~42PA97 CC1 .dec 17.40.100 Revocation of Development Plans and Conditional Use Permits The revocation of a development plan and conditional use permit for a telecommunication facility or antenna shall be undertaken in conformance with the provisions of Section 17.03.080 of the Temecula Municipal Code. In addition to the revocation findings set forth in Subsection 17.03.080.A., a development plan or conditional use permit for a telecommunication facility or antenna may also be revoked for any of the following reasons: A. The facility has failed to comply with any applicable Federal standards; The operation fails to comply with the requirements of this chapter as they exist at the time of permit renewal, The facility has not been upgraded to minimize its impacts (including aesthetics) on the community to the greatest extent permitted by the technology that exists at the time of renewal; The permittee has failed to supply assurances acceptable to the planning director that the facility will be brought into compliance within one hundred twenty (120) days, or E. The facility has not been properly maintained. 17.40.110 General Requirements - Location and Facility Separation All wireless telecommunication facilities shall be located so as to minimize their visibility and the number of separate and distinct facilities. To this end all of the following measures shall be implemented for all telecommunications facilities and antennas, except exempt facilities, shall comply with the following locations requirements: No telecommunicetion facility or antenna that is readily visible from off-site shall be insfailed on a site that is not already developed with telecommunication facilities or other public or quasi-public uses unless it blends with the surrounding existing natural and mammade environment in such a manner so as to be effectively unnoticaable or technical evidence acceptable to the approval authority is submitted showing a clear need for this facility and the infaasibility of co-locating it on another antenna or establishing a multi-user site. The antenna shall be located outside all yard and street setbacks specified in the zoning district in which the antenna is to be located unless technical evidence acceptable to the planning director or planning commission, as appropriate, is submitted showing that this is the only technically feasible location for this facility. Telecommunication facilities and antennas shall not be located closer than seventy-five (75) feet from any residential dwelling unit, unless technical evidence acceptable to the approval authority is submitted showing that this is the only technically feasible location for this facility or unless permitted pursuant to an agreement described in Section 17.40.220. No telecommunication facility or antenna that is readily visible from off-site shall be installed closer than one thousand (1000) feet from another readily visible telecommunication facility or antenna unless it is a co-located facility, is situated on a multiple-user site, or technical evidence acceptable to the planning director is submitted showing a clear need for this facility and the lofeasibility of placing the antenna in a co- located or multi-user site. This provision does not apply to architecturally integrated building-mounted facilities or to facilities permitted pursuant to an agreement described \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~)epts~PLANNING~Drdinances%ANTENN~e42PA97 CC1 .doc in Section 17.40.220. No new telecommunication facility or antenna that exceeds fifteen (15) feet in height shall be installed on an exposed prominent ridgeline greater than one thousand three hundred and r~ty (1350) feet above mean sea level, unless it blends with the surrounding existing natural and man-made environment in such a manner as to be effectively unnoticeable and a finding is made that no other location is technically feasible. 17.40.120 General Requirements - Basic Tower and Building Design All wireless telecommunicetion facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be designed to blend into the surrounding environment to the greatest extent feasible, To this end all the following measures shall be implemented: Telecommunication towers taller than thirty-five (35) feet shall be monopoles except where satisfactory evidence is submitted to the approval authority that a self-supporting tower is required to provide the height and/or capacity necessary for the proposed telecommunication use to minimize the need for screening from adjacent properties. All buildings, poles, towers, antenna supports, antennas, and other components of each telecommunications site shall be treated with non-reflective colors to offer concealment. Galvanized metal or gray paint is the preferred color. Satellite dishes other than microwave dishes shall be of mesh construction, except where technicel evidence is acceptable to the planning director or planning commission, as appropriate, is submitted showing that this is infeasible. Telecemmunicetion support facilities (i.e., vaults, equipment rooms, utilities, and equipment enclosures) in the public right-of-way shall be constructed out of non- reflective materials (visible extedor surfaces only) and shall be placed in underground vaults to all extent possible. Telecoromunication support facilities in areas of high visibility shall be sited below the ridgeline or designed, where possible, to minimize their profile (i.e., placed underground, depressed, or located behind berms). Freestanding above ground telecommunication support facilities shall be no taller than one story (about fifteen feet) in height and shall be constructed to look like a building or facility typically found in the area. Telecommunication facilities shall insure that sufficient anti-climbing measures have been incorporated into the facility, as needed, to reduce potential for trespass and injury. 17.40.130 General Requirements -Airports and Helipads All wireless telecommunication facilities and antennas located at or near any airport or helipad shall comply with the following measures: No tslecommunication facility or antenna shall be installed within the safety zone of any airport or any helipad unless the Airport Land Use Commission indicates that it will not adversely affect the operation of the airport or helipad. No telecommunication facility or antenna shall be installed at a location where special painting or lighting will be raquirad by the FAA regulations unless technical evidence \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%Depts~PLANNING\Ordinances%ANTENN/IR42PA97 CC1 .doc acceptable to the planning director or planning commission, as appropriate, is submitted showing that this is the only technically feasible location for this tedlity. Where tower lighting is required, it shall be shielded or directed to the greatest extent possible in such a manner as to minimize the amount of light that tells onto nearby propeffies, particularly residences. 17.40.140 General Requirements - Co-located and Multiple-user Facilities The co-location of wireless telecommunication antennas is encouraged. The establishment of multiple-user facilities may be appmved if the creation of a multiple-user site will reduce the overall impacts on the community. All co-located and multiple-user telecommunication tecilities shall be designed to promote facility and site shadng. Telecommunicetion towers and necessary appurtenances, including but not limited to, parking areas, access roads, utilities and equipment buildings shall be shared by site users to minimize the impacts on the community. Facilities that are not proposed to be co-located with another telecommunication facility or antenna shall provide a written explanation why the subject tecility is not a candidate for co-location. Co-location of facilities is not required if, at the sole discretion of the planning director, it may compromise proprietary data, equipment or technology. The tecility shall make available unutilized space for co-location of other telecommunication facilities, including space for these entities providing similar, competing services. A good faith effort in achieving co-location shall be required of the host entity. Requests for utilization of facility space and responses to such requests shall be made in a timely manner and in writing and copies shall be provided to the planning director. Co-location is not required in cases where the addition of the new service or facilities would cause quality of service impairment to the existing facility or if it becomes necessary for fie host to go off-line for a significant period of time. Approval for the establishment of facilities improved with an existing microwave band or other public service use or tecility, which creates interference or interference is anticipated as a result of said establishment of additional tecilities, shall include provisions for the relocetion of said existing public use tecilities. All costs associated with said relocation shall be borne by the applicant for the additional tecilities. 17.40.150 General Requirements - Vegetation Protection and Facility Screening All wireless telecemmunications teciiities and antennas shall be installed in such a manner so as to maintain and enhance existing native and/or landscaped vegetation to screen the facility, where necessary. The following measures shall apply to all telecommunication facilities, except exempt fadlities. If a telecemmunication tecility requires the installation of landscaping for screening or erosion control, a landscape plan shall be submitted. The Plan shall indicate all existing vegetation, identity landscaping that is to be retained on the site and any additional vegetation that is needed to satisfactorily screen the tecility from adjacent land uses and public view areas. All existing trees larger than four (4) inches in diameter shall be identified in the landscape plan with indication of species type, the diameter at a height of four and one-half (4%) feet, and whether it is to be retained or removed with project \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl%Depts~PLANNING\Ordi~ances~ANTENNA~242pA97 CC1 .doc development. The landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the appropriate usa permit procass; Existing trees and other screening vegetation in the vicinity of the facility and along the access roads and power/telecommunication line routes involved shall be protected from damage, beth dudrig the construction period and thereafter. If determined to be necessary by the planning director, a Tree Protection Plan for non-eucalyptus heritage trees, oak trees, or other trees of local importance, shall be submitted with building permit or improvement plan. This Plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist and shall specify the measures required to protect trees dudng project construction; Grading, cutting/filling, and the storage/parking of equipment/vehicles shall be prohibited in areas with native or landscaped plants to protect areas within the ddp lines of any tree that is required to be preserved. Such areas shall be fenced to the satisfaction of the planning director. Trash, debds, or spoil shall not be placed within these fences nor shall the fences henceforth be opened or moved until the project is complete and wdtten approval to take the fences down has been received from the planning director; and D= All underground lines shall be routed such that a minimum amount of damage is done to tree root systems; All areas disturbed during project construction other than the access read and perking areas shall be replanted with vegetation compatible with the vegetation in the surrounding area (e.g., ornamental shrubs or natural brush, depending upon the circumstances) to the satisfaction of the planning director; Any existing trees or significant vegetation, on the facilities site or along the affected access area that die shall be replaced with native trees and vegetation of a size and species acceptable to the planning director; and No actions shall be taken subsequent to project completion with respect to the vegetation present that would increase the visibility of the facility itself or the access road and pewer/telecommunication lines serving it. 17.40.160 General Requirements - Lighting All wireless talecommunication facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be unlit except for a manually-operated or motion-detector controlled light above the equipment shed door shall be kept off except when personnel are actually present at night. This requirement is not intended to address interior structure lighting. 17.40.170 General Requirements - Roads and Parking All wireless talecommunication facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be served by the minimum roads and parking areas necessary to accommodate service vehicles. Existing roads shall be used for access, whenever possible, and be upgraded the minimum amount necessary to meet standards specified by the Fire Chief and Director of Public Works. Any new roads or parking areas built shall, whenever feasible, be shared with subsequent telecommunication facilities and/or other permitted uses. Existing off site parking areas shall be used, whenever possible. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Deptt%PLANNINGM3rdttmnce~ANTENN/~I~42PA97 CC1 17.40.180 General Requirements - Environmental Resource Protection All wireless telecommunication facilities shall be sited so as to minimize the effect on environmental resources. To that end the following measures shall be implemented for all telecommunicetion fadlities, except exempt facilities: A. Natural vegetation and topography shall be retained to the extent feasible. No telecemmunications facility or related improvements including but not limited to access roads and power lines shall be sited so as to create a significant threat to the health or survival of rare, threatened or endangered plant or animal species. Ce Telecemmunicetion facilities or related improvements shall not be sited such that their construction will damage an archaeological site or have an adverse effect on the histodc character of a histodc feature or site. The facility shall comply with all applicable City Floodplain, Floodway and Storm Drainage and Erosion Control regulations. Drainage, erosion, and sediment controls shall be required as necessary to avoid soil erosion and sedimentation of waterways. Structures and roads on slopes of ten (10) percent or greater shall be avoided where precticel. Erosion control measures shall be incorporated for any proposed facility that involves grading or construction near a waterway or on lands with slopes over tan (10) percent. Potential adverse environmental and public use impacts that might result from project related grading or road construction shall be minimized; 17.40.190 General Requirements - Noise and Traffic All wireless telecommunicetion facilities, except exempt facilities, shall be constructed and operated in such a manner as to minimize the amount of disruption imposed on the residents of immediately adjacent homes and the users of adjacent recreational facilities. Be Backup generators shall only be operated during power outages and for testing and maintenance purposes. If the facility is located within one hundred (100) feet of a residential dwelling unit, noise attenuation measures shall be included to reduce exterior noise levels to at least a 65 dB CNEL at the property line and an intedor noise levels to at least 45 dB CNEL. Routine testing and maintenance shall only take place on non- holiday weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 17.40.200 General Requirements - Visual Compatibility All wireless telecommunication facilities shall be sited so as to be visually compatible with their surroundings. To that end the following measures shall be implemented for all telecommunication facilities, except exempt facilities: Fadlity structures and equipment shall be located, designed and screened to blend with the existing natural or built sun'oundings so as to reduce visual impacts to the extent feasible considering the tachnological requirements of the proposed telecommunication service and the need to be compatible with neighboring residences and the character of the community. Be The facility shall be designed to blend with any existing supporting structure shall not substantially alter the character of the structure or local area. %~TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~Depts%PLANNINGM:)rdinances%ANTENNAI;42PA97 CC1 .doc C. Following the assembly and installation of the facility, all waste and debds shall be removed and disposed of in a lawful manner. 17.40.210 Standard Agreements Required A maintanance~acility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will aseure the intent of this section will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant shall be submitted to the planning director pdor to approval of the building permit or other entitlement for use authorizing the establishment or modification of any telecommunications facility which includes any telecommunication tower, a new building or equipment enclosure that in aggregate are larger than three hundred (300) square feet, more than three (3) satellite dishes of any size, or a satellite dish larger then two (2) meters in diameter. The agreement shall bind the applicant and the applicant's successors-in-interest to probedy maintain the extedor apbearanca of and ultimately removal of the facility in compliance with the provisions of this chapter and any conditions of approval. It shall further find them to pay all costs for monitoring complianca with, and enforcement of, the agreement and to reimburse the City for all costs incurred to perform any work required of the applicant by this agreement that the applicant fails to perform. It shall also specifically authorize the City and/or its agents to enter onto the property and undertake said work so long as the director has first provided the applicant the following wdtten notices: An initial compliance request identifying the work needed to comply with the agreement and providing the applicant at least thirty (30) calendar days to complete it; A follow-up notice of default specifying the applicant's failure to comply with the work within the time period specified and indicating the city's intent to commence the required working within ten (10) working days; and The applicant has not filed an appeal pursuant to Section 17.03.090. If an appeal is filed, the City shall be authorized to enter the property and perform the necessary work if the appeal is dismissed or final action is taken in favor of the City; All costs incurred by the City to undertake any work required to be performed by the applicant pursuant to the agreement referred to in this section including, but not limited to, administrative and job supervision costs, shall be borne solely by the applicant. The applicant shall deposit within ten (10) working days of written request therefor such costs as the City reasonably estimates or has actually incurred to complete such work. When estimates are employed, additional moneys shall be deposited as needed within ten (10) working days of demand to cover actual costs. The agreement shall specifically require the applicant to immediately cease operation of the telecommunication facility involved if the applicant tails to pay the moneys demanded within ten (10) working days. It shall further require that operation remain suspended until such costs are paid in full. Standard agreements shall include, but not be limited to, the following stipulations agreed to by the applicant: Telecommunication facilities providers shall be strictly libel for any and all sudden and accidental pollution and gradual pollution resulting from their use within the City of Temecula. This liability shall include cleanup, intentional injury or damage to persons or property. Additionally, telecemmunication facilities lessors shall be responsible for any sanctions, fines, or other monetary costs imposed as a result ~TEMEC_FS101%VOL1%DeptS~LANNING~Ordinances~ANTENNAI~42PA97 CC1 .doc of the release of pollutents from their operations. Pollutants means any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, include smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, chemicals, electromagnetic waves and waste. Waste includes materials to be recycled, raconditioned or reclaimed. The telecommunication facility provider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the project when such claim or action is brought within the time peded provided for in applicable State and/or local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the provider(s) of any such claim, action or proceeding. The City shall have the option of coordinating in the defense. Nothing contained in this stipulation shall prohibit the City from participating in a defense of any claim action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith. 17.40.220 Agreement for Facilities on City Owned Prope~y or Rights of Way No approval granted heraunder shall be effective until the applicant and the City have executed a wdtteo agreement establishing the particular terms and provisions under which the right to occupy the City owned property or right-of-way shall be used or maintained. 17.40.230 Nonexclusive Grant No approval granted under this Chapter shall confer any exclusive right, pdvilege, license or franchise to occupy or use the public ways of the City for delivery of telecommunications services or any other purposes. Further, no approval shall be construed as any warranty of title. 17.40.240 Temporary Facilities The planning director may approve, for a period of up to one hundred twenty (120) days, a temporary antenna facility to provide service while an approved antenna facility is being fabricated or when an existing antenna has been damaged or destroyed. B= A pre-permanent temporary facility may only be approved after the approval authority has approved or conditionally appreved an application for a wireless telecommunications antenna and the project proponent has signed and returned a copy of the conditions of approval to the planning director. C. The planning director shell approve the actual term, location, and design of the temporary facility consistent with the goals and intent of this Chapter. 17.40.250 Nonconforming Facilities and Antennas Any antenna constructed in violation of this chapter, or in violation of any pdor ordinance or regulation, is subject to immediate abatement. Any antenna that is lawfully constructed prior to the effective date of this chapter that does not comply with the performance standards and requirements of this chapter, shall be deemed a nonconforming use and will be subject to the provisions of Section 17.03.070." Section 3. The following items are hereby added in the appropriate alphabetical locations of Chapter 17.34 of the Temecula Municipal Code: %%TEMEC_FS101%VOL1 ~DepIs~PLANNING~3rdinances%ANTENN,at~42pA97 CC1 .doc "Antenna" means any system of wires, poles, reds, reflecting discs, or similar devices used for the transmission or reception of electromagnetic waves when such system is either external to or attached to the extedor of a structure. Antennas shall include devices having active elements extending in any direction, and directional beam-type an'aye having elements carried by and disposed from a generally horizontal boom that may be mounted upon and rotated threugh a vertical mast or tower interconnecting the boom and antenna support, all of which elements are deemed to be a part of the antenna. Antennas shall include cellular on wheels (COWs) and cellular on light trucks (COLTs) radiities; as well as dispatch carTiers for Spedalized Mobile Radio (SMR) services and Enhanced SMR (ESMR). "Antenna - Building Mounted" means any antenna, other than an antenna with its supports resting on the ground, direcUy attached or affixed to a building, tank, tower, or structure other than a telecommunication tower. "Antenna - Directional" (also known as a "panel" antenna) transmits and/or receives radio frequency signals in a directjonal pattern of less than 360 degrees. "Antenna - Ground Mounted" means any antenna with its base, single or multiple posts, placed direally on the ground or a mast less than 10 feet tall and 6 inches in diameter. "Antenna - Vertical" means a vertical type antenna without horizontal cross- sections greater than three-quarters of an inch in diameter. B. "Co4ocation' - see telecommunication facility - co-located. Ce 'Monopole' is a wireless communication fadlity that consists of a vertical unguyed structure, erected on the ground to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. "NIER" means non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (i.e., electromagnetic radiation pdmadly in the visible. infrared, and radio frequency portions of the electromagnetic spectrum). "Public Service Use Facility" means a use operated or used by a public body or public utility in connection with any of the following services: water, waste water management, public education, parks and recreation. fire and police protection, solid waste management, transportation or utilities. "Public Way" means and includes all public streets and utility easements, now and hereafter owned by the City, but only to the extent of the City's dght, title, interest or authority to grant a license to occupy and use such streets and easements for telecommunications facilities and antennas. "Quasi-Public Use" means a use serving the public at large, and operated by a private entity under a franchise or other similar govemmental authorization, designed to promote the interests of the general public or operated by a recognized civic organization for the benefit of the general public. "Readily Visible" means an object that stands out as a prominent feature of the landscape when viewed with the naked eye. "Satellite earth station antenna" means a parabolic or dish-shaped antenna or other apparatus or device that is designed for the purpose of receiving radio or television broadcast signals. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~)epts%PLANNING~clinances~ANTENNAI~42pA97 CC1 .doc "Telecommunication Facility" means a facility that transmits and/or receives electromagnetic signals. It includes antennas, microwave dishes, horns, and other types of equipment for the transmission or receipt of such signals, telecommunication towers or similar structures supporting said equipment, equipment buildings, parking area, and other accessory development. 1. "Telecommunications Facility - Exempt" include, but are not limited to, the following A single ground or building mounted receive-only radio or television antenna, A ground or building mounted citizens band radio antenna including any mast, A ground, building, or tower mounted antenna operated by a federally licensed amateur radio operator as part of the Amateur Radio Service that is less than thidy five (35) feet in height, A ground or building mounted receive only radio or television satellite dish antenna, which does not exceed one meter (39.4 inches) in diameter, Mobile services providing public information coverage of news events of a temporary nature, Hand held devices such as cell phones, business-band mobile radios, walkie-talkies, cordless telephones, garage door openers and similar devices as determined by the planning director, and City govemrnent owned and operated receive and/or transmit telemetry station antennas for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems for water, flood alert, traffic control devices and signals, storm water, pump stations and/or irrigation systems. "Telecommunication Facility - Co-Located" means a telecommunication facility comprised of a single telecommunication tower or building supporting one or more antennas, dishes, or similar devices owned or used by more than one public or private entity. "Telecommunication Facility - Multiple User" means a telecommunication fadlity comprised of multiple towers or buildings supporting one or more antennas owned or used by more than one public or pdvate entity, excluding research and development industries with antennas to serve internal uses only. "Inhabited area" means any residence, any other structure regularly occupied by people, or any outdoor area used by people on a regular basis. Section 4. Chapter 17.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below. A. Section 17.06.050. D.7 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "7. Antennas. Are subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40." B. The line for Antennas in Table 17.06.050. D of the Temecula Municipal Cede is hereby amended to read as follows: \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~Depts~LANNING\Ordinances~ANTENNAle42pA97 CC1 ,dcc Accessory Front Structure Antennas I Not permitted Rear ISide Minimum Distance to Front Property Line Minimum Distance to Rear Property: Line Minimum Distance to' Side Prop.erty Li..n~.! 5ft. 5ft. Section 5. Chapter 17.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below. follows: Table 17.08.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as Communications and microwave installations= PO BP B. Footnote No. 2 of Table 17.08.030 is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code." Section 6. Chapter 17.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below. A. The following use is hereby added to Table 17.12.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code and shall read as follows: B. Footnote No. 1 is hereby added to Table 17.12.030 to read as follows: "1. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code." Section 7. Chapter 17.14 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as described below, A. The following use is hereby added to Table 17.14.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code and shall read as follows: Schedule of Uses Communications and microwave installations B. The Footnote at the bottom of Table 17.14.030 is hereby amended to read as follows: "1. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code in the P-R and OS zones." Section 8. The moratorium on the placement of new antennas contained in Ordinance 99-17 is hereby repealed. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%DeptS%PLANNING%OrdinanceS%ANTENN~I~242pA97 CC1 ,doc Section g. Severebilitv. The City Council hereby decJares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, pamgreph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall Cause the same to be posted as required by law. this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula day of ,2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SE q STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ,2000, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of ,2000 by the following roll cell vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk \\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1%Depts~LANNINGM::)rdk,JmCe~ANTENN,q~42PA97 CCl,doc ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 00- \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~Depts~PLANNING~Drdinances%ANTENN/iIe42PA97 CCl.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 4 DRAFT PC RESOLUTION NO. 00-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS" (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242) WHEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; and WHEREAS, On January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Randno California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND ANTENNAS AND MAKING OTHER MINOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0242)" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ._th day of ,2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of May, 2000 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \~TEMEC_FS101~VOLI%Dep~%PLANNING~:Iinances~ANTENN,e242PA97 CC1 .doc ATTACHMENT NO. 5 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%Depts~PLANNING~)rdlnances%ANTENN,.i~42PA97 CC1 .doc City of Temecula P,O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsors Name and Address General Plan Designation Zoning Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Other public agencies whose approval is required Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dave Hogan, Senior Planner (909) 694-6400 Citywide City of Temecula N/A N/A Adoption of an ordinance to regulate the design, construction, operation (except those aspects of facility operation regulated by the State Public Utilities Commission and Federal Communications Commission), and maintenance of wireless telecommunication and other types of antennas within the City of Temecula. N/A None. F:~Delots~PLANNING~:~'dbart, e~ANTENNA~274PA991ES,doC 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Planning Population and Housing Geologic Problems Water Air Quality Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that eedier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Pdntad name Date For F:~Dlipt~LANNING~Ordinanc. es~ANTENNA~'/4PAgGIES.doc 2 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Ce Imee end Suilx~ing I~omsstioq.Sources Physically divide an established community? Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy. or regulation Of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: 1 .all. The adoption Of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and pedormanca standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas dtywide. The ordinance is being propared under the guidance of the adopted City General Plan. As a result, no impacts are antidpated to local Land Use or Planning issues. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: be Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Nentle~ Signirment Unbee Lee~ ~ Mmgdofi 81gnJk~ Comments: 2.all. The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally apprepdate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. The ordinance is being prepared under the guidance of the adopted City General Plan and will fadlitate community availability of these services. As a result, no impacts are antidpated to local population and housing issues. 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? blues and 8uppmting Irl)lrmaliee 8our;es Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: F:~)ep~%PLANNING%Ordin~nCee~NTENNA%27qPAgGIES.dOC i) ii) iii) iv) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Strong seismic ground shaking? Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Landslides? Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, laterel spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial dsks to life or property? Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Comments: 3.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdate design, development and performance standards to regulate telacommunication facilities and antennas citywide. Any future facilities installed pursuant to an approval under this ordinance will comply with all appropriate zoning, building and safety, and fire related codes. Compliance with these codes will prevent and/or mitigate any potential impacts. As a result, no impacts are anticipated from geology or soil issues. 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: k... =,,d Suepomrm s,~.~ sDu,..,, Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowedng of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would dro_p to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have bean granted)? Substantially altar the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or dyer, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pettem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or dver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Pr~entlelly Slgnif'~clmq Unbll Signif'rant F:%Depb%PLANNINGM:)rdinartCee~ANTENNA%274PAgsiES.do~ 4 Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: 4. all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication radiities and antennas drywide, Any future radiities installed pursuant to an approval under this ordinance will comply with all codes. Compliance with these codes will prevent and/or mitigate any potential impacts. As a result, no impacts are antidpated from hydrology and water quality issues. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteda pellutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pellutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Polmn~mf Saenmeent UN, ee~ Lees Slgnifi~wd Miligatlae Signirwant InNact bmo.~e,~Med Imlw4,~ Comments: 5.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunicetion facilities and antennas dtywide. Some minor incremental emission increases may result from the construction of new fadlities. Howaver, these emissions are short-term and construction related and will not result in noticeable long-term pellutant emissions. As a result, no impacts are anticipated from air quality issues. F:~Depts~LANNING%Ordk~anCIt%ANTENNA%274PA991ES,do~ be TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC, Would the project: Imsuee lad 5uppoding IffeiTnalion Sources Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capadty ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Result in a change in air IrailK; patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety dsks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emergency access? Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted polides, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? Lell Than CommeNts: 6.all. The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and parformanca standards to regulata telecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. The ordinance is being prepared under the guidance of the adopted City General Plan. As a result, no impacts are anticipated to drculation and traffic issues. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or spedal status species in local or regional plans, polides, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any dpadan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, polides, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wddlife Service? F:'i:)epts',PLANNtNG~Ordimmces~ANTENNA%274PA991ES.doc 6 Cw Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydralogical interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife spedes or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. These sites will generally be in previously developed site and on existing structures that are areas where endangered spedes do not generally congregate. All specific proposals that will be submitted under this ordinance will racaive the appropriate and site-specific environmental review pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. As a result~ no impads are anticipated. 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: btue~._and Suppuffing Inlo~ma~:.,n tlc~tcam _ __ Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 8.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdata design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication fadlities and antennas dtywide. These sites are generally small and are not expected to effect regional mineral or aggregate supplies. As a result, no impads are anticjpated. F:~DepIs%PLANNING%OrdinanCeS%ANTENNA~274PA991ES.doc 7 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Crate a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport. would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? For a project within the vicinity of a pdvata airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant dsk or loss, injury or death involving wildland rites, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Illally sV~m~u.k~ mlg~lo~ ~ Th~n Comments: 9.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdata design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. The adoption of this ordinance will not adversely effect hazardous material issues. The further development of wireless telecommunicetion facilities under this ordinance will improve community safety and the efficient response to local life safety hazards. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. F:%Depts%PLANNING~OrdinanCes%ANTENNA%274PA991ES.doc 8 10. NOISE. Would the project result in: SignHIc.qd Pulenlielly Than Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Exposure of persons to or generationof excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vidnity above levels existing without the project? A substantial temporary or pedodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? For a projed located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a pdvata airstrip, would ,/ the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Iml~d Comments: 10.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas dtywide. The ordinance is being prepared under the guidance of the adopted City General Plan. The radiities do not create noticeable noise levels that are detectable within the community. However, some construction related noise will occur, it will be mitigated by the adopted construction noise ordinance that regulate work times. As a result, no noise impacts are anticipated. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: Lee Than Would the project result in substantial adverse physic.~l impacts assodatas with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental radiities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmentel impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fire protection? ,/ c. Police protection? d. Schools? F:~)epIs%PLANNING~OrdinInc4~%ANTENNA%274PAggtES.doc Parks? Other public facilities? Comments: 11 .all. The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and performance standards to regulate talecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. The adoption of this ordinance will not effect public services. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment fadlities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause sig~nificant environmental effects? Have suffident water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ,/' accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 12.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and performance standards to regulate talecommunication facilities and antennas dtywide. The ordinance will not effect waste treatment and disposal systems, nor will it create an increase in the demand for these services. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project: ..... issu~,..m..glSuppo(d,'nglnlOr.n~...~s;Sou,...n;~.. . Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including. but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping. and historic building F:~DepIa~PLANNING~Ordinance~ANTENNA~274PA991ES.doc 10 within a state scenic highway? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: 13.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunicetion facilities and antennas citywide. The ordinance is being prepared under the guidance of the adopted City General Plan and will facilitate community availability of these services. The mitigation of potential aesthetic impacts is an important goal of the Ordinance. All proposed facilities and antennas will receive design and visual impact review under this ordinance. This design review process will ensure that all future significant adverse impacts are mitigated to a level of insignificance. As a result, no impacts are anticipated to scenic and visual aesthetic issues. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:__ i F:oie/i/ly Sigra'~cant Ufaee Lean Then Signetcad latigaio. signlficeee NO :, .__ .k,.,--an~S.u_lF~l_naJ._,~__~.ien..Soulra .___let_Fed .....bc,.,meel~ Impute .~_.' a, C',~use a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historicel resource as defined in Section 1506,57 b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57 c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ,/ resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred ,/ outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 14.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally apprepdate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. All specific proposals that will be submitted under this ordinance will also receive the apprepdata and site-specific environmental review pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. As a result, no impacts are anticipated to cultural resources. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: ~lues e,qd Supegr_~ini Informalias Sources__ Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physicei deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physicel effect on the environment? F:~DepI~'~PLANNING%C)rdinancet%ANTENNA~774PAgglES.doC 11 PalentiaNy Sig~'Ka. US Lee The S:gneficed llhgadon Signlit. act No .imira:l Imaraerded. . IraReel IF ,f Comments: 15.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication fadlities and antennas dtywide. No impacts to park and recreational fadlities or services am expected. As a result, no impacts are antidpated. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife spedes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major pedods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indiredly? I~iea Slgniflcarl ktr,~oraled ~ Comments: 16.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropdate design, development and performance standards to regulate talecommunication radiities and antennas dtywide. The ordinance would permit the approval of small scale urban infrastructure in an predominantly urban context. The adoption of this ordinance would not create any significant environmental impacts and would not cause any cumulative environmental impacts. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case s discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Eadier analyses used. Identity eadier analyses and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," descdbe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the eadier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. F:~Dept~LANNING%OrdinIr~e~ANTENNA%274PA99tES.dOC 12 Comments: 15.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally appropriate design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunicetion radiities and antennas dtywide. No impacts to perk and recreational facilities or services am expected. As a result, no impacts are antidpated. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. leaas ~d Suppodi~e .l~Nmstlea Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the envirenment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of th_e major pedods of. California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means .that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of best projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: 16.all The adoption of this ordinance will provide locally apprepdata design, development and performance standards to regulate telecommunication facilities and antennas citywide. The ordinance would permit the approval of small scale urban infrastructure in an predominantly urban context. The adoption of this ordinance would not create any significant environmental impacts and would not cause any cumulative environmental impacts. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an eadter EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Eadier analyses used. Identity earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,'" describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the eadier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. F:~Depts~PLANNINGM3rdi~aP~eI~ANTENNA~274PAltlES,dOc t2 ATTACHMENTNO. 6 ANTENNA APPROVAL MATRIX \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1~Dei~s%pLANNING~DrdinanCeS%ANTENN,1242PA97 CCl.doc ANTENNA APPROVAL MECHANISM MATRIX ' '. TYPE OF'ANTENNA Residential Radio and Television Antenna Ci~zens Band Amateur Radio Antenna Dish Antenna SIZE(S) OF ANTENNAS If freestanding up to 10', or an attached antenna that is less than 10' above the top of the residence in height, Any freestanding antenna that is more than 10', or an attached antenna more than 10' above the roof line Up to 35' Between 35' and 50' Above 50' Up to 35' Between 35' and 50' Above 50' Less than or equal to 2 Meters in diameter Greater than 2 Meters and Less than 10 % Feet in diameter Vertical (commercial) Antennas Wmreless Telecommunications Antennas Larger than 10 % Feet in diameter Up to 2 antennas that am up to 15' in height More than 2 antennas or any antennas more than 15' in height Building mounted with architectural integration and less than 12' above roof Building mounted more than 12' above the roof, or that are mounted on a light tower, sign, or other structure Monopole and all other facilities not specifically mentioned Approval to co-locate onto an existing building Approval to co-locate onto an existing antenna structure Approval for a multi-user site (i,e, multiple antenna structures) Any variation from the standards or any type or size of antenna not specifically listed REVIEW AND APPROVAL MECHANISM Exempt Director Hearing Exempt Director Hearing Planning Commission Exempt Director Headng Planning Commission Exempt Residential - Exempt. Non-Residential - Administrative Design Review Planning Commission Exempt Administrative Design Review Administrative Design Review Director Hearing Planning Commission Administrative Design Review Director Hearing Planning Commission Planning Commission \\TEMEC_FSI01\VOL1%Deptf~%PLANNING\Ordinances~ANTENN~42pA97 CC1 .doc ATTACHMENT NO. 7 LIST OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES WHO PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE DRAFT ORDINANCE \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl',DeptS~LANNiNG\OrdinanCes%ANTENN~t:42PA97 CC1 .doc 2. 3. 4. 5. ATTACHMENT NO. 7 LIST OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES WHO PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE DRAFT ORDINANCE Julie Furukawa, Spdnt PCS Dennis Lowry, AirTouch Cellular Adan Maddd, Spdnt PCS Greg Morrison, Stoorza, Ziegaus & Metzger Joe Richards, Richards, Mueting and Wilkes (represents Verizon Wireless and AirTouch Cellular) Barbara Saito, Nextel Communications \\TEMEC_FS10fiVOL1%Depts%PLANNING~OrdinanceG%ANTENN~42PA97 CCt.doc ITEM 15 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council o, suppo. se.oe. May 23, 2000 Old Town Local Review Board Appointment PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative Secretary RECOMMENDATION: Review Board. Appoint three applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Old Town Local BACKGROUND: There are currently three full terms available on the Old Town Local Review Board. These positions are through May 15, 2003. The terms of Committee Members Bill Harker and Albert Blair expired on May 15, 2000. Denny Mighell resigned from his position, which also expired on May 15, 2000. The available positions were advertised and posted in accordance with the City Council's adopted policy and procedure for making appointments and reappointments. Four applications were received and forwarded to the Council Subcommittee consisting of Councilmember Pratt and Councilmember Roberts. After review of the applications, Councilmember Pratt and Councilmember Roberts recommend the appointment of Bill Harker, Albert Blair and Ned Montgomery to serve full three-year terms on the Old Town Local Review Board. In addition, it was recommended that Fred Perkins serve as the alternate member through May 15, 2002. Attached are copies of the applications received by the filing deadline of April 25, 2000. ATTACHMENT: Copies of Applications for Appointment Agenda Repor~s~Appointment Old Town Advisory CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE'~I~'O~N LOCAL REVIEW BOARD NAME: HOME PHONE: ~t~"'~" OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER NAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 4~r WORKPHONE: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. SIGNATURE:~ ,~'~(~T'~'~ DATE: Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions%Application for DId Town Local Review Board April 6, 2000 City of Temecula Dear Sir I hereby make application for reappointment to the City Old Town Review Board. I have enjoyed my time with the board. I feel that my contribution has been worthwhile. I have had a longtime involvement with land use, planing and constructions enforcement issues. I believe my qualifications are ample. I have served on many committees and boards and experience has given me an opportunity to look at land use problems from many differing points of view. I have no business or property ownership interests in Old Town. My interest is that the area retain architectural flavor as intended and identified in the Old Town Specific Plan. Thank you for your consideration. Albert C. Blair Albert C. Blair 30433 Danube Ct. Temecula Ca. 92591 (909) 587-8508 EDUCATION 1974-1976 1958-1973 1957-1959 1953-1956 University of Utah, Graduate Studies, Manpower Economics and Public Administration Brigham Young University, BS Sociology, Emphasis on Demographics Santa Barbara City College, General Studies. Santa Barbara High School, Diploma WORK HISTORY 1987-present Retired 1976-1987 1976-1976 1966-1976 1962-1966 1949-1962 Salt Lake City Division of Building and Housing Services, Director Salt Lake City Division of Building and Housing Services, Assistant Director Salt Lake City Planing Division, City Planner State of Utah Department of Transportation, Land Use Analyst School time employment BOARDS AND AFFILIATIONS 1997-2000 1988-1988 1984-1987 1976-1987 1976-1987 1976-1987 1976-1987 1976-1987 1976-1987 1976-1987 1973-1987 1971-1976 Temecula City Old town Review Board, Member Salt Lake County Board of Zoning Adjustment, Member Salt Lake Handicapped Concern Committee, Member lntemational Conference of Building Officials, Member Utah Conference of Building Officials, Member Salt Lake City Planing Commission, ex-officio Member Salt Lake City Board of Zoning Adjustment, ex-officio Member Salt Lake City Board of Appeals and Examiners, Staff Support Salt Lake City Housing Advisory and Appeals Board, Staff Support Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Committee, Staff Support Salt Lake City Neighborhood Housing Service, Board of Directors Member Utah Housing Coalition, Board of Directors Member ,4 10-00 A:_8:SO ]N CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD NAME: ~Q~LLtF~-t ~, ~r%~K~ YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA ~4 ADDRESS: 3~ ~,5- &'5, dL;~---a4_ I.G,~e.,.4, HOME PHONE: ~7~'3~t OCCUPATION: ~(/~i~ EMPLOYER NAME: ~ EMPLOYER ADDRESS: N/A EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: WORK PHONE: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions~Application for Old Town Local Review Board ATTACHMENT TO APPLICATION OF WILLIAM A. HARKER 1) Educational Background and Degrees AA In Business Management, Pasadena City College. Post Graduate In Business Administration, UCLA. Post Graduate in Industrial Engineering, Cal Tech. 2) Boards, Committees and Commissions on Which Served Temple City Incorporation Committee, 1959 & 1960. Temple City Planning Commission, 1961 through 1964. Temple City Council, 1965 through 1976. SCAG Transportation Committee. 1966 & 1970. LA County Sanitation District, 1966 & 1970. Temple City Revitalization Blue Ribbon Committee, 1966. General Chairman, Temple City Camellia Festival, 1976. Riverside County Aviation Commission, 1985 through 1997. Riverside County ALUC, 1985 through 1997 Rancho California Airport Relocation Committee 1987 & 1988 Temecula Incorporation Conunittee, 1998 & 1999 Old Town Temecuta Local Review Board, 1990 to present. Old Town Theater Design Review Committee, at present. 3) Organizations to Which I Belong Founder, Society for Advancement of Industrial Engineering. State of California Licensed Engineers Association. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Founder, Friends of French Valley Airport. French Valley Airport Pilot's Association. Life Member, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. Life Member, Temecula Temecula Town Association. Temecula Town Association Board of Directors 4) Why I Believe I am Qualified and Wish to Serve As a 24 year resident of Temecula I have a keen interest in preserving the historical aspects and heritage of Old Town Temecula. I believe that my knowledge of the area's history and my ten years of service on the Local Review Board do qualify me for reappointment to the position that I am presently serving and applying for. CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD NAME= ADDRESS: HOME .HONE: OCCUPATION: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA I y;r~ ~. WORK PHONE: {~O~.J ~9 ~Z~a EMPLOYER NAME: /~Y"7'A~,~' EMPLOYER ADDRESS: / EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDSDEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: / ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, serviceii TEff~ 6C-c ~,4 7; ~ n/ BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): ,iq> ,q ~'c,£,~jg~,:, Ou~,~6/C 7.,...~ ~c,0 ~ ~ /~w~ ~ ~T~ t~r/~ I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. SIGNATURE: ~ . Return to: City Clerk's Office; 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions~Application for Old Town Local Review Board CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEWBOARD 04-25-00 P02:06 IN NAME: Fred perki ng YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA ADDRESS: 41934 Main Street, ffl07, Temecula, CA 92590 HOME PHONE: 208-1196 WORK PHONE: 699-7957 OCCUPATION: CEO of McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. McT,auVhlin RnginePring · Min~ng~ Trip EMPLOYERNAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: 4 years Oregon State University Marine Corps/9 years 41934 Main Street, 13 fl107, Temecula, CA 92590 LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ~A ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): Temecula Chamber of Commerce California Mining Association California Chamber of Commerce BRIEFLY STATEWHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD, AND WHY YOU BEUEVEYOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC(Useadditionalpaperifnecessa~): have property in Old Town and am very interested in helping to see that the :heme to Old Town and the plans the City has laid out for us are adhered to. business is in construction and developement and I have the proper >ackground and experience to oversee these projects. I un that any or all informatior~ ~r~his form may be verified. I ~onsent to the release of ..................... t.!..o.,__ Urposas. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6~.~.~. O,__R Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions~Application for Old Town Local Review Board ITEM 16 TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager DATE: May 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Consideration of Sponsorship Request for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) 2) Consider the sponsorship request of $30,000 for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. Approve a transfer of $30,000 from the Community Service funding to the Economic Development sponsorship budget. DISCUSSION: Staff has received the sponsorship request in the amount of $30,000 for the 6t" Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival, which is attached for your review. Due to the timing of the event in September 2000, the Temecula Valley International Film Festival is requesting that the City release the funds to the Festival in May to operate and promote its Film Festival. The Temecula Valley Film Council will be exhibiting at the Show Biz Expo in June at the Los Angeles Conventidn Center. The Film Council would like to have pdnted matedais and posters available to distribute promoting the Festival at this international film industry trade show. Representatives of the Temecula Valley International Film Festival met with the Economic Development Sub-committee, Councilmembers Jeff Comerchero and Ron Roberts, on Apdl 25, 2000, to discuss their funding. As a result of this meeting, the Sub-committee recommends that this request move forward for Council consideration. Subsequently, Mayor Jeff Stone requested a meeting with representatives of the Temecula Valley Film Festival and Film Council on May 16t~, 2000, to obtain additional information, As a result of this meeting, Mayor Stone would like the City Council to consider revising the proposed agreement to include the following: 1) 2) 3) The Temecula Valley Film Festival will provide matching funds to the City's sponsorship contribution. The City will pay vendors directly for operating costs. There will be no commissions, consultant fees and/or salaries paid to any party from the City of Temecula's sponsorship. The Temecula Valley International Film Festival will provide 60 - 70 films which will include: special tributes, studio films, independent films, foreign films, student films as well as presenting ~TEMEC_FSIOI\VOLI~DeptS\CITYMGR\WOLNICKG~Agendarep~rtS~Filrn Festival 'O0.doc several additional lifetime achievement recipients in various categories. Also, for the first time the Cinematographers Association will be bdnging their First Time Director Sedes to the Festival. This is a sedes of films that is only shown in Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and now Temecula. Another addition to this years event is the participation of the Filmmakers Alliance. They will be presenting a series of digitally produced films, which have not been shown at any Film Festival before. Temecula will be the first city to screen these technologically innovative films using digital technology to a wide general audience. This year, one of the Festival's sponsors will be Indiespace.com, an Intemet company that has worked with the Santa Monica Film Festival and Newport Beach Film Festival in advertising and hosting an on-line film market for our film participants. This will prove to be an exciting part of the Festival utilizing the Intemet. A sampling of the schedule of events planned over the four day pedod include: Opening Night Preemiere & Reception General Screenings Filmmakers Workshop Sedes Black Tie Awards Gala Filmmakers' Hot Air Balloon Race Post Screening Parties Digital Technology Day Closing Night Wrap PartyNiewers Choice Awards The event will take place September 14 - 17, 2000, at a theater location in Temecula. Final arrangements are currently being negotiated with Bruce Sanborn of the Movie Experience at Tower Plaza. The Festival's subsequent events will be held at locations in the City of Temecula. The Film Festival will be organized and presented by Cinema Entertainment Alliance and Nova Pictures in cooperation with Temecula Valley Film Council and the Theater Foundation. The Women's Club and the Playhouse will also be supporting the Festival. The Film Council is fully supportive of this arrangement. Peter Barnett of Nova Pictures, will be the Festival Director. He will provide a strong background of managerial, production, and finance experience, which will prove beneficial for the Festival. Jo Moulton and Eve Craig, Founder and Co-Founder of the Temecula Valley Film Council and Film Festival will serve as this years Festival Advisors. The Festival's core management team's qualifications are attached for your review (see attachment E). In line with the Festival's commitment to promoting the arts and providing an environment for creativity through education, a portion of the proceeds will go towards a scholarship grant to an area graduating high school senior. In addition, haft of the Opening Night ticket sales proceeds will go towards the fundraising efforts of the Theater Foundation for a Performing Arts Theater in Old Town Temecula. The event attracted approximately 5,000 in attendance in 1999 with the attendance expected to increase to 10,000 this year. The Film Festival's pdmary intended market, the filmmakers, composed the majodty of last years audience. Plans for the 2000 event include an information campaign to the community about what a film festival is all about W~th the proper marketing of the Festival locally, affordable ticket prices, fewer screening days, and an information campaign, the attendance from the community is expected to increase, \\TEMEC_FSIOI\VOLI~DeptS\CITYMGR\WOLNICKG~Agendarep2rts~IIm Festival '00.doc The '99 Festival publicity consisting of newspaper, magazine, radio and trade publications coverage combined with their respective circulation numbers. received approximately 6 million impressions. The Festival was also included in several international listings of upcoming film festivals, and covered by the Hollywood Reporter and Vadety publications and websites. Publicity for the 2000 event will include a direct mail campaign to film industry professionals, a public relations campaign to major industry trade publications, internet, prime national and local television news/entertainment programs. The local newspapers will be the Festival's primary advertising vehicles consisting of a media mix of broadcast, print and outdoor advertising will be scheduled two months before the Festival. Information speaking engagements with local service organizations, Community Theater, school and civic groups will also be scheduled. The Film Festival provides many economic benefits to the community. The Festival's effectiveness is measured by the filmmakers who attend the event. Through the exposure of a Film Festival, Temecula is considered as a viable filming destination for the filmmakers films, commercials, and television projects. The Film Council and Festival provides local jobs when filming projects come to the area. In addition, there is an increase in revenue for the City's restaurants, hotels, and shopping centers while the Film Festival takes place as well as during filming projects throughout the year. The Film Council has generated many activities over the past year, which are outlined in Attachment F for your review. As part of the FY1999-2000 Community Services Budget, the Council will be considering funding from this account. FISCAL IMPACT: A transfer from the FY1999-00 Community Services funding line item is required to fund this request for $30,000 to the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Advertising Agreement Attachment B - Sponsorship Package Attachment C- Business/Media Plan and Budget Attachment D - Recap of 1999 Temecula Valley Film Festival Attachment E - Key Festival Management Qualifications Attachment F - Recap of Temecula Valley Film Council Accomplishments 1999-2000 \\TEMEC_FSIOI~VOLI \Depts\CITYMGR~WOLNICKG~Agendareplijts~Filrn Festival 'GO,doe ATTACHMENT A - ADVERTISING AGREEMENT SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECUIA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL This Agreement, made this 23rd day of May. 2000, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (heminafier referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM COUNCIL, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafier referred to as ("TVIFC"). A. TVIFC will operate the "6m Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival" on September 14-17, 2000. The Temecula Valley International Film Festival is a special event located at the TBD Theater in Temecula. Locations of the Festival's subsequent events are to be determined but will be located in the City of Temecula. Attendance in previous years has been between 5,000 - 7,000+ people for the event. The anticipated attendance for the 2000 Festival is estimated at 10,000. B. The City of Temecula desires to be a Major Sponsor of the 2000 Temecula Valley International Film Festival. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. In exchange for the payment of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00), the City of Temecula shall be designated as a "Major Sponsor" of the 2000 Temeeula Valley International Film Festival. In exchange for being a Major Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as listed in Attachment B. B. Within 60 days after conclusion of the Film Festival, TVIFC shall prepare and submit to the City Manager a written report evaluating the Film Festival event, its attendance, media coverage, description of the materials in which the City was listed as a Major Sponsor and a financial statement of the revenue and expenses of the Film Festival. C. TVIFC agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officer, agents, and employees flee and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or by mason of TVIFC's acts or omissions or those of TVIFC's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley International Film Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law. D. TVIFC shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TVIFC and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. %\TEMEC_FSIOI\VOLI~epts\CITYMGR\WOLNiCKG~Agendarei~rtS\Filrn Festival '00.doc Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with Temecula Valley International Film Festival. Minimum Scope oflnsurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (A) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage provided on ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (S) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (c) Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, Worker's Compensation Insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (D) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultants profession. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (A) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (S) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Worker's Compensation/Employer's Liability: Worker's Compensation as required by the State; and Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (D) Professional Liability Coverage: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. (E) Liquor Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI~Depts\CITYMGR\WOLNICKG%Agendarep~ItS~Film Festival 'O0. doc The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or TVIFC shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. E. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attomey's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. \\TEMEC_FSIOI~VOLI~Depts\CITYMGR\WOLNICKG~Ager~dareI~ts~Film Festival *OO.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by Chairperson and attest m by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Temecula Valley Film Council, has hereunto subscribed this Contract day, month, and year hereinabove written. DATED: TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Jo Moulton Founder and Advisory Board Temecula Valley International Film Festival Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor City of Temecula ATTEST: Susan W. Iones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney \\TEMEC_FS101WOLfd:)epts\CITYMGRWVOLNICKG%AgendareI:~s%Film Festival 'OO.doc ATTACHMENT B-SPONSORSHIPPACKAGE City of Temecula as Major Sponsor ($30,000) Benefits Include: · Recognition of City of Temecula's sponsorship in all festival collateral materials. · Recognition of City of Temecula's sponsorship in all applicable Broadcast and Print Media advertising, signage and press releases. · AcknowledgmentofCityofTemecula'ssponsorshippnortoandafierevery~lm screening and filmmaking workshops. · Full page, black & white Inside Cover Page, City ofTemecula ad in the program. · 10 complimentary. tickets to the Opening Night Premiere and Reception. · 10 complimentary tickets to the Black Tie Awards Gala and Closing Night Wrap. · 10 complimentary. tickets to all Festival workshops/panel discussions/seminars. · 10 complimentary. tickets to all Nightly Networking Opportunity Parties. · 10 complimentary. tickets to any pre-festival fundraising events. · 100 regular screening tickets for giveaway to city employees · Festival Souvenirs (festival shirts, mugs & hats) · Access to the VIP Hospitality Suite. · Acknowledgment of City of Temecula representatives at the Opening Night Premiere & Post Premiere Reception, Black Tie Awards Gala, Closing Night Wrap Party. · Opportunity to incorporate Festival Logo in any City of Temecula Marketing efforts, insertion of City logo in the festival website and in the program sponsors' logo page. · Oppornmity for City of Temecula to enhance community relations by involving City officials and employees in different aspects of the festival (from festival presenters to hosts/hostesses in all prime festival special events). As Host City, the City will always be acknowledged as a cooperative entity in the event titling regardless of which the eventual Presenting or Title sponsor will be. ATTACHMENT C - BUSINESS/MEDIA PLAN AND BUDGET MARKETING PLAN The 6th Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival's marketing strategy will consist of the following: INTERNET MARKETING In the past five years, a real revolution has taken place, one that offers events such as the 6'~ Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival, greater reach and greater impact than any other marketing innovation of the past century- the Internet, more specifically, the World Wide Web. With our own web site, ~vxv.tviff~com, the festival is guaranteed 24- hour worldwide exposure. This year the TVIFF will have an Interact sponsor. Indiespace.corn will provide the Web page, Internet advertising, links to film industry vendors, and an On-line Film Market for all participants that includes streaming trailers. Owner Jeanne Novak has represented the Santa Monica film Festival and Newport Beach Film Festival. This new partnership will provide a new and exciting approach to expanding the festival's audience. DIRECT MAIL Informative and timely brochures, updates, reminders and bulletins will be sent via direct mail campaign to filmmakers, film distributors, production companies, talent agents, publicists, and film schools. PUBLICITY & MEDIA RELATIONS Extensive public relations campaign before, during and after the festival. Major industry trade publications (Hollywood Reporter, Daily Variety, Screen Int'l) and area newspapers (Arts and Entertainment, Guide. Calendar Sections) will be aggressively pursued for stow editonals about the Festival. Prime national and local television news/entertainment programs such as Entertainment Tonight, Access Hollywood will be tapped for strategic stow placements. Festival fact sheets will be distributed to travel publications, local event calendar guides, chambers of commerce, area schools, area organizations. Information speaking engagements with local service organizations, Community Theater, school and civic groups will be scheduled. ADVERTISING Although local newspapers will be the festival's primary advertising vehicles, a media mix of broadcast, pnnt and outdoor advertising will be scheduled two months before the festival. Cross promotions with festival sponsors and advertisers will be aggressively encouraged. Display billboards in malls, on screen advertising in theaters, posters, free standing inserts or brochures and ticket giveaways are just a few of the high impact promotional ideas planned to advertise the festival. The 6m Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival Sponsorship Package Elements The festival sponsorship package is tailored to meet the individual sponsor needs. The following ere a variety of programs included in the sponsor benefits package based on sponsor level of pamcipation: Advertising: Advertisement in the 2000 Official Program. Sponsor recognition in the TVIFF event advertising m print~oroadcast media, whenever applicable. (Time and space allotment will dictate sponsor recognition avallabdity) Publicity: Extensive distribution of press release announcement of sponsorship. On site interviews of sponsors in print/broadcast media may be arranged, whenever possible. Corporate Logo: Placement in corporate sponsor page of event official Program. Placement in event program with the sponsored film screening(s) or event. PlacementJmenfion on print/broadcast media advertisements, whenever applicable. Placement on the TVIFF web site. Corporate Banner:. Placement of sponsor barmer at any or all festival theater and special event venues for the full run of the festival, whenever possible. (Subject to venue approval) Corporate Signage: For sponsors of specific film screening (s) or special festival events, a sponsor sign display board will be created to announce sponsorship of the screening (s) or event. Corporate Literature: Sponsor literature, brochures or promotional items may be displayed, dislxibuted at various festival venues throughout the ~~l run of the festival. Inforraation and corporate tables will be set up in the lobbies of the festival theater venues, the festival box office, media center and the Hospitality Suite. Web Site: WWW.TV1FF COM is the official year-round site of the TVIFF. Sponsorship is acknowledged with sponsor higos and brief sponsor bio. Hyperlinks to sponsor websites can be established. Specific Corporate Identification: Depending on sponsor level of participation, a sponsor name may be allached to a specific portion of the film festival, as the "Official" supplier of product or service. Hospitality Suite: Sponsors will have access to the Hospitality Suite. This suite is reserved for special festival guests, filmmakers and sponsors. Ticketing and Special Passes: .~1 sponsors will receive complimentmy tickets and passes to. all performances, workshops and special festival parries. Ticket and Pass allotment will depend on level of sponsorship. 2000 6m Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Opening Night Premiere & Reception Thursday, SepL l4, Cocktails at 6:30pra/Premiere, 7:30 - Reception at 9:30pro. Tickas: $10 General Screenings Thursday, Sept l 4- Sunday, Sept l 7, From hOOpm m l I :OOpm, General Admission, Black Tie Awards Gala Sponsor TBD, Friday, September 15, 6PM, cocktail~ 7PM dinner, Lifetime Achievement Awards presentation and danc~ Tickets, $75 per perspit Filmmakers Workshop Series Saturday, Sept 16 through Sunday, Sept 17- I O:OOam-3: OOpr,~ Industry experts lead dialogues, workshops and panel discussions on variousfilm-industry related topic& Tickas, $12 per persott Post Screening Networking Opportunity Parties Friday, Sept 1 $ - Sunda. v, Sept 17.Hospitality Suite, 6PM. Live entertainment, samples of various cuisines. Party and mingle with ~lmmakers~ $$ cover charg~ Closing Night Wrap PartylViewer's Choice Awards Sponsor, TBD. .Tunday, Sept 17, 6pnt Announcement -winners for Best Feature Film, Best Fonign Film, Best Shon Film, Best Student Film, Best Documentary, Best Animatio~ Tickas, SlO/persmt How to Purchase Tickets General Admission tickets and special festival ticket packages may be purchased through the TV[FF at the Hospitality Suite or at the Festival HQ starting September 1, 2000. To purchase ticket by phone or maiL, please make checks or money order payable to TVIFF and mail to: TVIFF, 27740 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100, Temecula, Ca 92590. ffpaying by credit card, please fill out the following, sign and return this portion to above-mentioned address. VISA , MC , AMEX Prim Name: Address: Telephone (HOME) , Discover AccX # Exp. Date: Signature: OFFICE: All pass and ticket orders by phone will be hdd at WILL CAI.I. at the Festival Box Office. Pick Up at WILL CALL starts September 17, 2000. All ticket sales are final. No refunds or exchanges. For info, call TV1FF at (909) 699-6267 or www.rviff. com or write us c/o TVIFF, 27740 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100, Temecala, Ca 92590. A Word about Screeninqs. Workshops and Special Events Due to circumstances beyond our control, some or aH schedules of screenings, workshops and special events may be subject to change with little or no advance notice. Daily updates will be posted at the theater venue. the Festival Box Office and the Festival Hospitality Suite. No refunds or exchanges, except in case of a program or special event cancellation. Seating is ovaliable at all screenings on a first come-tint served bask. We recommend that you come 15 minutes before your scheduled screening time. Festival ~ms are not rated. Parental discretion advised on some rims. Films not in English will be presented with English subtitles. 2000 6t" Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival Budget Expenses Collateral Printing $5,000 Graphics Design $3,500 Publicity/Media Relations/Advertising $22,500 Special Guests/Filmmaker/Workshop Presenter Expenses $27,500 Transportation $1,000 Accommodations $1,000 Trophies/Plaques/Certificates $ 1,000 Cash Prizes $3,000 Security (3 days) $1,000 16MM-2000 Projector Remal $3,500 Party Expenses Opening Night $1,000 Gala Night $10,000 Closing Night Wrap $1,000 Party supplins/D6cor/Rentals $5,000 Festival Management Expenses Staff/CEA/Nova Pictures $25,000 Evem Coordinator/Sponsor Dev. $1,500 + comm. Volunteers Coordinator $1,000 Logistics Coordinator $1,000 Commissions $10,000 Print/Traffic/Screemngs Coord. $3,000 $41,500 Miscellaneous Theater Rental ( 5/4 days) $10,000 Festival Operations on site Office $1,000 Postage/Freight $2,000 Merchandise (shins/hat. s/mugs) $2,000 Telephone/Fax $2,000 Insurance $3,000 Signage Installation/Banners $3,000 Permits/Fees $500 Scholarship Awards $2,500 Contingency $23,500 $5,000 TOTAL FESTIVAL BUDGET $131,000 2000 6th Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival Projected Income Sponsorships $80,000 Tic ket/Merc handise/Event Sales $65,500 General Admission Tickets @ $5 5 screenings in 5 theaters for 4 days @ $5 per film with an average viewer attendance of no less than 50 per screening, $25,000 Opening Night Premiere & Reception @ $10 $10 x 300 paid attendees, $3,000 Black Tie Awards Gala @ $75 $75 x 300 paid attendees, $22,500 Closing Night Wrap @ $10 $10 x 300 paid attendees, $3,000 One Day Pass @ 520 $20 x 100 paid attendees, $2,000 Workshops, @ $12 $12 x 100 paid anendees, $1,200 Merchandise T shins @ $10 x 100, $1,000 Mugs @ $5 xl00, $500 Souvenir Programs @ SIx 300, $300 Entry Fees 200 x $25= $5,000 200 x $10= $2,000 Total Projected Income: Less Event Expenses: Projected Net Proceeds $145,500 $131,000 $14,500.00 ATTACH MENT D - RECAP OF 1999 TEMECULA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL 1999 5th Annual Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival Wrap-up Report By Jo Moulton Over-all, the film festival achieved once again its primary purpose of bringing the film industry to town so that they may have first hand opportunity of seeing what our area has to offer in terms of their production plans for the future. Filmmakers from all over dropped in every day of the eight days that the festival ran. Media coverage was extensive. The combined cash and in-kind sponsorships from the business commtmity were very strong. Attendance, although below expectations, showed a marked increase fioom previous years. Ticket sales were enough to cover the cost of the event. One thing that was made pretty clear based on this year's attendance (approx~ 5,000), Temecula does not have a solid base of sophisticated film festival audience, as yet. There is no question community residents knew about the event. Opening Night, Gala Night and Closing Night receptions were well attended. But the screenings and workshops, although they had increased attendance from the previous years, still scrapped for audience share. It is obvious the parties and the other peripheral activities created to make the event more festive are popular. But in order for Temecula to be a serious contender in the film festival circuit- a strong showing at the box office is needed. Filmmakers have to feel secure in the knowledge that the community does support emerging, fresh, innovative cinematic works of art. For all the social and political national interest in ridding mainstream cinema of smut, gore and violence, Temecula actually is ahead of the game by having its very own film festival, which showcases artistic, cultural, educational and entertaining film product. More work needs to be done towards increased community awareness and active participation. The knowledge that this community appreciates art and culture in addition to their appreciation for little league baseball, soccer and swim meets is encouraging. A real challenge but encouraging. Attached is a complete list of film festival participants, an event feedback compilation sheet, media impressions/marketing coverage generated by the event and the festival income/expense financial report. Film Festival Participants Ataturk Tolga CRack 4115 Wisconsin Ave.#301 Washington, D.C. 20016 Bad Timing Eric Addison 8110 High St., La Mesa, CA 91941 The Beloved Sarita Siegel 118A Panorama Road Christchurch 8, New Zealand Beer Run Steven Oritt 2605 Tilden Ave., LA~ CA 90064 The Climb Sine River Twice C/o: Stuart Singin Pallorarea Entel~ainrnent Corp. 125 N. Main St. Port Chesxer, NY 10573 Between Girls Julic Blumberg 725 ~/2 N. F_xlinburgh Ave. #1, LA, CA 90046 Between Shadow ChadPark 1501EdrisDrive LosAngeles, CA90035 The Big Empty La Cucaracha Left of Center Productions Jack Perez 507 N. Vista Street Los Angeles, CA 90036 Bongwater AI Uzielli 369 S. Doheny Dr., BIt, CA 90211 Bloody Date EricJaspers R. Hogerbeetstraatl5-lll 1052VMAmsterdam, Nethe~ands A Boy's Life FilmFAN Pictures, Inc. Malt Zboyoski / Dylan Triveile #5 Kimberly Ave., Asheville, NC 28804 Burning Black Widows Joe Vidaureila 1519 Rollin St.#D, So. Pasadena, CA 91030 The Business Card P. Pa~ick Hogan 227 N. Belmont St. #5, Glendale, CA 91206 Canvas Mike Erasqum 1874 Greenfield #2, LA, CA 90025 Call Me Fishmaei Stephen Dovas 202 St. James PI., Brooklyn, NY 11238 Casanova Falling Bigel/Mailer Films-Chris Cotmolly 443 Greenwich St #3A. NY, NY 10013 Cat's Cradle Simon Bowler 1326 N. Sycamore Ave., LA, CA 90028 Children's Crusade Marion Bomschier Promenadengasse 18, CH-8001 Zurich Chronicle of Love Mayo Films, Ltct Tzipi Trope 2 Wash. Sq. Village, NY, NY 10012 Crickets & Potatoes Graham Streeter 520 So. Burnside Ave. Suite 10-L Los Angeles. CA 90036 Daylight Hours Only Taman Tracz 23731 Valle Del Oro #202, Newhall, CA 91321 The Dirt on Morn Doug Abede 12800 N.E. 19 1g Cii'cle BattleGround, WA 98604 Deadly Squirrel Jason Walker P.O. Box 486, Monrooka, QLD, Australia 4105 Detention Contact: JR Robens 2317 Stratford Ct., Fort Worth. TX 78103 The Devolution of Etha~ Chadwick Chris Webb Yotmg 3733 N. Clark St. #3W, Chicago, IL 60613 Digital Gremlin For Windows Julie Goldman 272 6m Ave. #2R, Brooklyn, NY 11215 Dream Pador Mike Dahl/Jonathan Lawrence 1037 RoBing Hills Manor#40 Fullerton, CA 92835 Dreamers Neal Ftedefieks 7230 Franklin Ave. #311, LA, CA 90046 The Elevator Chuck Rose 636 Burnside Ave.#107, LA, CA90036 Entropy Dan Green 1950 N. Tamarind Ave. #102, LA, CA 90068 first Date Eric Chambers 1631 16th St., Santa Monica, CA 90404 Frank Fmds Out Peep Show CharHe Call 607 N. Rossmote Ave. #203 Los Angeles, CA Freight Mark Norberg 14947 Dickens St.#8, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 freshmen Tom Huang 1210 Idaho Ave. #103, Lk CA 90025 Gristle Andrew Murray 51 Imperial Ave.,Bondi NSW 2026,Attstralia From the Top of the Key Jim Heigner 821 Third St., #109, Santa Mortlea, CA 90403 GetaJob Jason Wolk 9903 Santa MoMca BI., #814, BH. CA 90212 The Gift Gila Donovan 134 N. Sycamore Ave., LA, CA90036 Grease Monkey Grog Bennett (323) 634-7898 Homecoming Michel D' Addafio 1811 Ocean Front WalkS5 Vemce, CA 90291 A Hard Day's Night C/o Miramax Films (212) 941-3800 Inconceivable Robert Weis 1925 Robin Rd., San Marlno, Ca 91108 Insha Allah Hani Narouz 549 N. Kenmore Ave., LA, CA 90004 In Search of the Famous Hoosier Breaded Pork Tenderloin Sandwich Jensen Rufe 17411 TamO'ShamerDr. Poway, CA 90264 Jesus 2000 Eric Cooper P.O. Box 6407, Malibu, CA 90264 Just Add Love David Cole 139 Forest Ave. Santa Cn~ CA 95062 Jug A Matter of Time Oliver Olsen 4-185 Parkside Dr. Toronto, Ontario M6R-2Y9 Jug Outside the Door John Tranchina 11 Cambridge Way, Wayside, NJ 07302 Just Sue Me Neva Friedenn Award Entertainment 3255 Cahuenga Blvd. West #100 Los Angeles. CA 90068 Keepers of the Frame Randy Gitsch 1685 S. Colorado Blvd.#S-139 Denver, CO 80222 Killing Off Jud Cremata 906 Pacific Ave. #18, Venice, CA 90291 Los 3 Cidos Octavio Gasca Ojinaga #2210, Chihuahua Mexico, 31020 Lovers on the Bridge Contact: Mir~rrmx Filmn (212) 941-3800 The ~ Tzaddik Michael Zaidan 8575 Wonderland Ave., LA, C A Le Bateau Vanessa Newell 138 N. Detroit LA, CA 90036 Life of Love Vinny Lee 8811 Wooalley Ln Garden Grove, CA 92841 Life Ain't No Crystal Stair Renford Reese 3801 W. Temple Ave., Pomona, CA 91768 Loc Light Louis Hans Van Wes~aak P.O. Box 1024, 4801 BABREDA, Netherlands, 31-76-5219324 The Lost Kingdom Lee Hsiang Hsiu #3, Ln 31, Jea Hsin St., Sanchi=ung Taipei, Taiwam ILO.C. Maria On the Flowers Victoria Arias Fraa~a 225 W. 14th St #5E New York, NY 10011 Motel Nicholas D. Taban'ok #2-134 Shuter St., Toronto. Ontario M5A1VS, Canada Mr. Willard Swallows A Fly Tanna Herr 1785 N. Los Robles Ave. Pasadena, CA91104 My New Best Friend Karen Rosin 938 Malcolm Ave. Los Angeles, Ca 90024 My Tun Susan Weisshaar Not Not Now Jennifer Treur P.O. Box 1154 Crows Nest, NSW 1585 Australia Opie Gone Mad Andy Johnson 504 Selway St., Glendale, CA 91206 1001 Nights Tom's Midnight Garden Hyperion StUdio 111 N. Maryland Ave. #200 Glendale, CA 91206 The Perfect Candidates Brian Hams Krinsky 1774 El C, emto H. ~4, Lk CA 90028 Plug Jamie Waese./Mener Gourjian 14259 Dickens St.#8 Sherman Gaks, CA 91423 Rats Phil Sencker Spot Pr~L Inc. 546 NE 85th ST. Seattle, WA 98115 Return of Paul Jarrett Clark Jarfelt 1723 So. Areboa'st Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90025 Rose's Contact: Karchi Perlman 311 S. Calhoun St. #100X TaIlahassee, FL 32301 Run Lola Run Sony Pictures Classic Melody Korenbrot 8271 Melrosc Ave., Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90046 Running Still Peter LoGreco 451 N. Orange Grove Ave. Salute Sung-Wu Pink 3301 Honolulu Ave.#49, Tujunga, CA 91042 Santero Shadow Catche~ Productions Kirk Ellis 3205 Lowry RcL, LA. CA 90027 Scrapbook Piano Player Pro~./Kttrt Huenne 475 E. Orange Grove Ave., Suite L Burbank, CA 91501 The Set Effect Bany Rubinow 8419 Star Hand Ave., West Hills, CA 91304 Shergar Blue Rider Pictures 2800, 28~ SL #105. Santa Mouica, CA 90405 Slings & Arrows James Cudo 2028 Sanborn Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90027 Sounds of the Mountain, Dances of the Ocean Juggling The Old and New: Women in Modern Taiwan Greeting the New Year in Talwan Contact: Kao Jen Hwan 6300 Wilshire Blvd. #1510, LA< CA90048 Pnso Ng Pasko, Bata, Bata, Paano Ka Ginawa, Hanggang Kaila Kita Mamahalin, Ang Lalaki sa Buhay Ni Selya Star Cinema Films/Theme Castro ~41 Set. Borromeo St. (Justnag Compound) ABS-CBN Annex, Quezon City 1103, Philippines, (632) 4147819/Fax (632) 4138704 Stolen Heart Backxoad Films/Terry O'Brien Smart Bliss Nell Greive 3023 Cardiff Ave., LA, CA 90034 Suits Tenatly Film Company Eric Weber P.O. Box 608, Tenatly, NJ 07670 Survivors Brett Levner 55 Eastend Ave., NY, NY 10028 Sway Mikael IcdeuTxiegler 138 N. Dclxoit, LA. CA 90036 Taking the Plunge Lisa Haisha 8424~A Santa Monic~ BI., LA, CA 90069 The Tell oTak Vibrator Jill Chamberlain 998 Amsterdam Ave. ~4B, NY, NY 10025 Temps Five Sisters Productions Maria Burton 171 Pie~ Ave.#207 Sanla Monica, CA 90405 10 Seconds Christophe Joly 3236 Descanso Dr. Silver Lake, CA 90026 Tigers Made In Heaven John Ealer 727 V2 Levering Ave., LA, CA 90024 Third Crusade All F~ter 3554 V'mton #206, LA, CA 90034 Trapped Manatee Films/Ralph Wa~nan 1677 Winder St #A, SanDiego, CA92103 Trinket Brook Young 11028 'A Orsego St. North Hollywood, CA 91601 Until 8PM Marco Niemeijer Prinsengracht 611 1016 HT Amsterdam Vietnam: Long Time Coming Seventh Art Releasing Mafia Bjorkdahl Vincent Greg TwitbuR 1820 Ardmore Ave. #2A Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Wedding Band High Altitude Film~ Contact: Palxick Reaves 550 So. Barrington,#1214, LA, CA 90049 Which Way Por Favor Eugene Cofsky 4465 Nogales Dr. Tarzana, CA 91356 Who You Know James McCabe 6200 Mossway, Baltimore, MD 2 1212 Ydlow Badge of Canrage Peter J. Barnett 6496 Ivanme Ave. Hollywood, CA 90068 Zoltar from Zoron Eric Paesel 808 ~A N. Fuller Ave., LA. CA 90046 The Distraction Greg Tcnnam San Francisco, CA A Boy & His Toaster Got Rights, lt's Gotta Be the Shoes Jedi The Creative and Performing Arts Academy of San Diego Paintball Apocalypse Ground Grauer The Tommy Gibbons Story Windows, Scorpion Red Handed, Trashicon The Graner Academy of San Diego A Shoe Carnival Adventure Victory over Violence Being a Meteorologist Whenever You Ride A Bike Web Site, I Am, COPS Hanft Letterman's Top 10 Andrew Robinson Elementary School of Jacksonville Hotida Cultural Heritage Espanola High School of Espanola, New Mexico Alien Invaders Cleveland High School, Cleveland, Oregon Soaring Minds, Play Stuff In Search of the Singralnian Crystals A Comedy of Elements Back to the Past Children's Sclmol of La Jolla, CA. High School Jealousy Noelle Gonzalex Temecula. Ca Diversity Choices, Alcohol & Drug Use Diversity: Free Your Mind Sexual Responsibility Academy of Our Lady of peace High School San Diego, Ca 1999 5th Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival Winners 1999 TVIFF VIEWERS' CHOICE FIRST PLACE WINNERS Feature Film Category The Climb Director: Bob Swaim Producers: Mark & Pamela McClafferty Foreign Film Category Shergar (England) Writer/Director: Denis Lewiston Producers: Walter Josten, Brian Agnew, Jeff Geoffray Short Film Category Caught in the Act Writer/Producer/Director: Justin Zackham Co-Producers: Lonnie Schuyler/Glean Garland Student Film Cate~2orv The Last Tzaddik (AFI) Writer/Director: Michael Zaidan Producer: Joseph Smith Cast: K~stma Malota, Chris Mulkey, William B. Davis Rodhey Scott Animation PLUG (USC) Director: Me, her Gourjian Producer: laime Waese Documentan The Return of Paul Jarrett Director. Clark Jarrett JURY SELECTION FIRST PLACE WINNERS Scrapbook Director: Kurt Kueane Producer: Richard Kuenne Shergar Opie Gone Mad Writer/Director: AMy Lee Johnson Producers: Ralph Vfmter/Ffike Tarzian Tigers Made In Heaven CUSC) Writer/Director: John Eale~ Exec. Producer: Scott Files Producers: Lucy Butler, Caleb Butk 1001 NIGHTS Director. Mike Smith Vietnam Long Time Coming Producers: Jetty Blumenthal,.Pcter Gilbert & Gordon Quinn 1999 5th Annual Temecula Valley lnt'! Film Festival MEDIA IMPRESSIONS & EVENT MARKETING COVERAGE Total audience reached by the festival based on press clippings collected and broadcast monitored during the month of May and June 1999 only. Based on press clippings from various newspapers and publications such as the Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union Tribune, North County Times, The Press Enterprise, The Californian, The Community Publications Group, San Bernardino Sun, Inland Entertainment Round Up, The Business Press, The Temecula Valley Business Journal, Hollywood Reporter, Daily Variety, Daily Bulletin plus Intemet, tWorld Wide Web exposure, combined estimated impression is 6,000,000. The Press Enterprise printed and distributed 60,000 TVIFF General Information brochures throughout all zones of Riverside County. The Press Enterprise, The Californian, North County Times and The Community Publications Group ran Festival advertising starting middle of May through the third week of June. Advertising and editorials about the event included prime space in the Press Enterprise's The Guide, Arts and Entertainment as well as The Californian and North County Times' Preview. Palm Plaza included the Festival in their monthly shopping center coupon book distributed to 20,000 shoppers in Temecula and Murrieta. The Movie Experience in Murrieta and Temecula as well as the Temeku Cinemas ran on screen slide advertising in all their 34 screens in between movies - two weeks prior.. Broadcast coverage included mentions, promo ads and ticket givesways in KNX Radio, 1070 AM, KPBS, San Diego, KATY Radio and K-FROG. Combined estimated listening audience of 1,200,000. Cable TV included promotional plugs on TCI and Media One. Cable areas covered are Temecula, Mumeta, Lake Elsinore, Hemet, Moreno Valley, Menifee and Corona. Event promos aired for three weeks straight. Promotional Info Sheets about the Young Filmmakers Showcase and the Filmmaking Workshops were distributed throughout the Temecula Unified School District schools, San Diego and Riverside colleges. TVIFF General Information brochures, special events invitations were mailed and distributed to schools, production companies, tv and film distributors and Temecula/Murrieta residents. HERE'S WHAT THEY SAID ABOUT THE: 1999 5th Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival: "Just wanted to thank you for all you and your staff did to make the TVIFF happen. We met great people, made good contaas, saw a few really good films, got great positive feedback on our film, enjoyed the gala and the workshops, and loved the location. We left quite happy. Thank you. ' James McCabe, Director, "Who You Know", Baltimore, MD "1 want to say thank you for your hospitality... Everyone was very nice and helpful. We had a great stay and we enjoyed the festival immensely. We were also very pleased with the reception our fdm received by the audiences and other filmmakers...we were thrilled to be invited to participate in the festival. I really appreciate the opportunity to screen my film three times, have time to network with other ftlmmalers, and to participate on all the other activities wish you the best for nextyear.t" Phil Seneker, Prod/Director of"rats!" Seattle, WA 'We are still coming down from a great trip to ILA and Temecuht Everyone we met at the festival were so pleasant-it makes my heart warm to remember all the organizers, volunteers and ftimmal~ing teams we met...Thanks for the suppert you gave our ftlm. The extra screenings-made the trip really great for us especially to be one of the favorites~ Jennifer Treur, Director/Writer, "Not Not Now", Sydney, Australia "It was a great experience screening my film in Temecula... I got some nice feedbach and support from those who attended The theaters were among the best l've screened at and l enjoyed exploring Temecul~ 1 hope to get the chance to screen some of my future projects Jim Fleigner, Director, "From the Top of the Key", Los Angeles, CA "We had a great time for the few days that we could be in Temecult~ You organized a great festival You showed many films from first and second timers, which wouldn't get shown anywhere else. You gave everyone three screenings, which other festivals often don't do. And there were always a number of fdms showing. The balloon ride and the car rally were wonderful additions. Good luch on futore festivalsI' Greg & Rene Termant, Producer/Director: "The Distraction", San Francisco, CA "Thank you for making the TVIFF an enjoyable experienc~ I had a lot of fun while there, and I appreciate all the efforts of you andyour staff of volunteer~ Thanks!" John Tranchina, Director, "Just Outside the Door", Dallas, Tens "We're heard good things about your annual event Pls. send us info on your next on~ ' Joan Kalb, San Diego, CA "I attended the Festival all day/night on Saturday and Sunday. I enjoyed it very much. I !ooh foeward to next year. Cha~es Patroske, cDatrosk(~ualcomm.com 1999 TVIFF INCOME/EXPENSE REPORT INCOME Cash Sponsors Ticket Sales Entry fees Sub Total Cash Income In-Kind/Trade Sponsorships TOTAL CASH INCOME TOTAL IN-KIND DONATIONS $57,500.00 $11,911.35 $1,265.00 $70,676.35 $70,500.00 $70, 676.35 $70, 500. O0 EXPENSE Printing $9,992.90 (Graphics Design, Pre-Press and Printing of all festival collateral pieces) StattYConsultant Fees/Commissions Publicity/Advertising Rentals (Projectors/theater/tables/linen/chairs) Catering/Entertainment (food, paper goods, beverage, liquor) Insurance Scholarship Mist. (Permits/Postage/Security/Supplies/fees/trophies/phone) Sub Total Expenses In Kind/Trade Expenses TOTAL CASH EXPENSES TOTAL CASH INCOME $17,515.00 $11,546.62 $6,867.70 $13,301.87 $1,397.00 $2.000.00 $8,058.25 $70,679.34 $70,500.00 $70.679.34 $70,676.35 NET INCOME (LOSS) ($2.99) ATTACHMENT E - KEY FESTIVAL MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATIONS MANAGEMENT TEAM The Temecula Valley International Film Festival core management team is composed of independent film industry. professionals and local community film festival advocates: · Jo Moulton & Eve Craig, Founder & Co-Founder of the Temecula Valley Film Council and Temecula Valley International Film Festival Both will serve as this year's Festival Advisors. · Peter J. Barnett, Festival Director · Kevin Haa~arud, Film Program Director · Maggi Allen, Operations / Logistics Coordination · Megan Barnett, Sponsor Development, LA · Ellen Watkins, Event Coordination & Sponsor Development, Temecula · Stacy Sievek, Film Print/Traffic & Theater Screenings · Maryann Edwards, Black Tie Awards Gala Chairperson · Andtea Cunningham - Opening Night dt Presenters Chairperson · Steve Phelps - Film lndust.ry Workshops Chairperson · Cathy Forbes - Closing Night Chairperson · Linda Wunderlich - Publicity/Media Relations, Temecula · Mike Kerrigan - Publici.ty/Media Relations, LA · Sunny Thomas- Film Selection Review Group Chairperson Together, the above group make a formidable team of talented and committed group of creative individuals wjth combined experiences exceeding 60 years in motion picture, television, public relations, event management and non-profit fundraising activities. Key Festival Management Team Bio's Jo Moulton, Founder/Advisor With over 20 years of Broadcast Commumcations and entertainment induslxy experience, she holds a BA in Mass Communications from the University of the Philippines. She began her career as a Production Assistant and rose through the ranks to head up the Entertainment Division of KBS-TV, Channel 9 in Manila, Philippines. While at KBS-TV, she produced and directed variety shows (Superstar), action-comedy(Dragon Force),game shows, (Clubhouse 9) rock concerts, political and sporting events. Assignments included the Miss Universe Beauty Pageant, the Olympic Games, Commodores, Michael Jackson, Dionne Warwick and Ben Gees Asian concert tours. In 1977, she moved to Los Angeles and joined KABC-TV Eyewitness News for 8 years. hi 1989, she moved to Temecula and with Eve Craig and Jim Meyler, she helped estabhsh the Arts Council of Temecula Valley and the Annual Temecula Valley Arts Festival. In 1992, she rounded the Temecula Valley Film Council, which to date, markets the City of Temecula as a locanon-filming destination. Temecula has since been host to films, tv series episodes, commercials, music videos and print photography- bringing positive economic impact and exposure to the area. In 1995, she rounded the Temecula Valley lnt '1 Film Festival. Now in its 6th year. the festival has shown more than 350 films with several having their world or U.S. premieres at the event. In 1997, she produced the San Diego World Film Festival that showcased the best of mamstream films (The Truman Show) with the best of independent films (Smoke Signals). SDWFF attracted an unusual show of major studios' support. Its Advisory Board consisted of studio heeds such as Sony's John Calley and MGM/UA's Lindsay Doran and industry professionals like Ronald Bass, James Cameron, Richard Donner, Paula Wagner, Jacqueline Bissett Julia Roberrs, Tom Cruise, Nicele Kidman and Mel Gibson. In addition to creating, producing and managing special projects, Ms. Moulton works free-lance for vmious indie film productions, national & regional fihn/TV commercials (1998 Volknvagen & 1999 Che ,vv Cars dr Trucks) and music videos (for Midnight Records & Silvervision). She is currently Co- Producer of an Irish/Canadian film project, Dolphin Bay, set for filming in Ireland. She is also supervising the development orB. Scott Purdy's sci-~ senes, The Starbright Trilogy. Eve Craig, Co-FounderlAdvisor Helen Evadne Meyler Craig has had a distinguished career as a tree arts advocate. Her devotion to the promotion of the arts started long before she reached Temecula. As coordinator for the Music Center Building Fund of Los Angeles, Eve helped raise $18.5 million for the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. She also raised funds for the arts while serving as President of the Mumcipal Arts Gallery Association, the Hollywood Bowl Palxoness Cornnuttee & as host for the LA Civic Light Opera special events honoring Katherine Hepburn, Angela Lansbury and Carol Chanmng. In Temecula, it is hard not to see Eve Cralg's contribution to die promotion of the arts and culture in the commumty the last twelve years. From the minute she set foot in quaint small town Temecala fi-om urban downtown Los Angeles in 1989. she became a charter member of the Temecula Valley Arts Council. She headed up the city's first ever Arts Festival in 1990. She has chaired or assisted with each of Temecula's 10 arts festivals, the annual Mayor's Ball and the Concert on the Cn'een. In 1992 she helped Jo Moulton establish the Temecula Valley Film Council. In 1994, she helped organize the city's first lnt'l Film Festival and the annual Black Tie Awards Gala, which has awarded Lifetime Achievement Awards to industry notables such as Howard W. Koch, Robert Wise, Carl Reiner, Karl Malden and Shirley Jones. For this year's event, Eve Craig with Jo Moulton will serve as the festival advisor. Peter J. Barnett, Festival Director Mr. Barnett is the Supervising Producer on "The Thin Green Line" for the Outdoor Life Network and has produced the award winning films "Yellow Badge of Courage" and "Mullleans' starring Tippi Hedren. Recenily he wrote and produced several commercial spots airing on MTV, FX, Nick-at-Night and E! He is Distributing and representing the award winning and critically acclaimed Canadian femure "Extraordinary Visitor", while developing several projects, inchidmg ticdon/non-fiction books and screenplays in many gem'es, He is co-foundeT of Arcane Film% Inc. and founder of Nova Pictures Inc. that dismbutes, develops and packages properties for numerous projects. as well as commercials. He has vast experience In Television/feature production finance having worked in production finance for HBO on "Arliss', "Lloyd What Happened", "Lansky", "The Rat Pack" and "Poodle Springs", also for New LIne Cinema on ~'American History X" and "Alone" for ShowTime. At Walt Disney Pictures he was responsible for budgeting several motion pictures to include "Mr. Wrong", "Eddie", "The Rock" and "Con Air". Mr. Bamen worked hi production accounting on Dianey's "Standing Room Only", Hollywood Picture's "Spy Hard" and Touchstone Picture's "Romy & Michele'. As a sureenwriter he was fmalist for the annual Chesterfield Sureenw~ting Competition. During the past he has hosted a monthly writing seminar for aspiring young wrttels. Mr. Barnett is a gadme of California State University Northridge. holding a degree in Film and Television Production. He also graduated with honors from Webster University receiving a Masten in Business Managemere. In addition to his Film~V experience Mr. Barnett is a Major in the United States Marine Corps where he served as a combat heftcopier pilot and intelfigence officer. He is a recipient of two Air Medals for Heroic Achievement, awarded by the President of the United States. He served during the Gulf War and continues his service as reserve mobilization and public relations officer In Encino, CA. Mr. Barnett is a member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, Independent Film Project, American Film Institute, American Cinematheque, Scriptwriters Network, The Alex Film Society and the Hollywood Arts Council. Mr. Barnett is married and lives in Hollywood with his incredible wife and two amazing children. Keyin Haasarud Mr. Haasarud is currently the Film Program Director of the prestigious and popular HBO sponsored US Comedy Arts Festival in Aspen. He has served as film programmer for 1995, 1996 and 1997 Temecula Valley International Film Festivals. He comes back this year to once again lend his expertise in programming selected features, shorts, documentaries, animation and student films. Mr. Haasarud's filmmaking credits include the documentary series Science of the Souh a dungjan Perspective for HBO, and the award winning short, Angel Arizona (Sundance Channel). He got his start with Roger Connan at his Concorde/New Horizon Studio, later spending five years with HBO Original Programming, developing shows that included the Larry Sanders Show, Tracey Takes On, Kathy & Mo Show, the Ben Stiller Show and Dennis Miller Live. 2000 6m Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival Honorary Advisory Board (In Alphabetical Order) Albert Berger, Producer. "Election ", "King of the Hill" Fred Caruso, Producer. "The Skulls ", "Blue Velvet ". "The Rat Pack" Eve Craig, Co-Founder, Temecula Valley Film Council Yorg Egan, President, Kodak Entertainment Robert Faust, Festival Director, Los Angeles Independent Film Festival Terry Gilmore, VP. Paradise Chevrolet, Cadillac. Oldsmobile Kevin Haasarud, Program Director, HBO/US Comedy Arts Fest m Aspen Michael Bill, Vice President of Production HBO Jo Moulton, Founder, Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festn, al Herbert Margolis, President, Cinema Entertainment Alliance Dan Stephenson, Chairman/CEO, Rancon Corporation Pamayla Ziolkowski, VP, MarPare Productions PAST LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD HONOREES Howard W. Koch, Producer (1995) Robert Wise, Director (1996) Carl Reiner, Writer/Director/Comedian (1997) Karl Malden, Actor (1998) Shirley Jones, Actress (1999) YR 2000 Nominated Recipients Burr Reynolds Alan A!da Lauren Bacali ATTACHMENT F - RECAP OF TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1999-201)0 Recap of TVFC Accomplishments 1999-2000 Japanese Soda commemial by In-School Productions filmed in Lake Elsinore and Temecula. Temecula location was primarily mad/driving shots on Rancho California Road heading East past the wineries. Economic impact was cast/staff/crew of 47 who spent money in Temecula- they ate at our local restaurants and visited 3 wineries, purchasing wines and souvenirs to take home to Japan. Additional spending in Lake Elsinore and Murrieta for rentals, rooms and food. The Temecula Valley Film Council participated in the AFCI Locations '99 Trade Show at the Los Angeles Convention Center from February 19 -21 in the Inland Empire Film Commission Boodr. Our poster size location photographs were displayed and we distributed our locations postcards Photographer. Michael Salas met with Sunny Thomas and Maggi Allen to scout some still photo locations. Mr. Salas was looking for horse and cattle ranches, vineyards and orange groves that we were able to provide and on a beautiful sunny day. Preliminary photos were taken and Mr. Salas will return in a few weeks to continue his work. In addition to his commercial photography, Mr. Salas works with a national locations photo library in New York, and he will be giving the TVFC copies of his photos to us in our Temecula locations photo file. Kate Carmichael of American Eagle Outfitters spent 4 days in Temecula using Embassy Suites as her base for scouting locations for their latest project. Ms. Carmichael used the TVFC production guide as one of her resources for locating her production needs locally. The Stampede was used as the location for a new TV pilot (yet to be named) which was shot in 4 days. The production staff indicated that they would like to return to Temecula for another project. Wc will keep in contact with them. Local movie producer, David James filmed "The Big Blind". They filmed at the Casino in Lake Elsinore for 3 weeks and at the Old Town Bus Stop and in local strip malls in Temecula for 3 days. David also wrote the screenplay. Financially, they reported spending $120,000 in Elsinore and approximately $30,000 in both Murrieta and Temecula. Stacey Sivek, of Temecula, was the contact person and the production manager. They had a staffof about 100 - 60% were hired locally (electricians, carpenters and extras). They rented apartments in Murrieta and got their supplies and equipment from local merchants in Temecula. · Katie Carmichael returned and spent a week shooting still photographs in Temecula for American Eagle Outfitters. · Several local farms with wooden barns were photographed for consideration in the upcoming Amway calendar. The Areway photographer spent the weekend at Temecula Creek Inn. Members of Film Council are participating festival activities by producing filmmaker "Welcome' packets include the NEW Chamber of Commerce map of Temocula and tourism brochures and the Film Council's Production Guide of local businesses and services. A Poker Run Hot Rod rally has been arranged for the filmmakers on Jtme 19th following the Great Race stop. Filmmakers will be driven through Tcmecula for fun and will be shown some of our excellent photo location spot at the same time. Maps will be distributed so that if they see something they like, they will know how to find it again Still photos were taken in the De Luz are and will be used for automotive magazine advertising. 17 people stayed in local hotels for the shoot. Temecula Talent ,S7~owcase '99 was a great success. Close to 600 tickets were sold for what appeared to be a FULL HOUSE. As this was a fundraiser for the TVFC, we am pleased to have raised over $600, after awarding $2400 in prizes to the contestants The Temecula Valley was represented at ShowBiz Expo at the L. A. Convention Center on the weekend of June 26 - 27 in the IEFC booth with location photographs and our production postcards. Local bams with wood siding were used as backup production settings for a film in process. This allowed the filmmaker to avoid the extra expense of returning to the films original location in lowa. SheriDavisofthelEFCwasabletohelpusasthismquestcameinthe middle of the Festival. Cinema Entertainment Alliance produced a very successful Film Festival. Attendance was increased over last year's Festival. Over 100 Temecula and area residents actively participated as volunteers to make the event run smoothly. Over 100 films were shown over a seven-day schedule in seven theaters at the Temeku Cinemas. Filmmakers and film production people from all over the word attended the Festival and represented their films. The Film Council distributed over 100 ~'Welcome" packets to the filmmakers. Each packet included the NEW Chamber of Commerce map of Temecula and tourism brochures and the Film Council's Production Guide of local businesses and services. A Poker Run Hot Rod rally was arranged for the filmmakers on June 19th following the Great Race stop. 40 filmmakers were driven through Temecula for a fun afternoon and were shown some of our excellent photo location spots at the same time. Maps were distributed so that if they saw a location they liked, they would know how to find it again. The Australian team was awarded a basket full of Temecula related items On Sunday, June 20lh 15 filmmakers were taken for Hot Air Balloon experiences over the vineyards. Many of the filmmakers indicated that they would like to return to this area. Eclipse Productions called looking for "migrant farmer" type houses. Their exact needs were outlined on their lnternet website. Included in the website were photographs of possible locations they had found with an explanation of what was needed to make them the perfect film site. Area photos were taken (mostly on the eastside behind the vineyards) and Sunny Thomas met with their location scout to take her to the properties. NBC Olympics for television filmed interviews in Temecula. They called to get an idea of some interesting locations to film in the city. Digital photographs were taken of the wineries (Callaway, Thornton & Maurice Carrie) and Old Town (the Church, the murals at the bus station & the archways). Location photos were sent by Email and then followed by hard copies. Locations were scouted for 10 days for the shooting of"3000 Miles" to begin September 1, 1999. These filmmakers were participants in the 1999 Temocula International Film Festival and came to find locations in Temecula as a direct result. With assistance from the Film Council, City Staff and Mayor Ford, the locations scout has been able to convince the filmmaker that everything he needed could be found or created in the Temecula area. There was to be a production crew of 25 people staying in Temecula for 28 days of filming. This was an independent film with a budget of $500,000. Most local cities, merchants and residents have been very cooperative and accommodating. Production on "3000 Miles" has been shelved due to financing. There was a distant hope that when they have new financing, they would come back to Temecula. There were 4 scenes including a casino, and 2 airports that were set for this area. The Inland Empire Film Commission forwarded requests for property ownership information for the De Luz/Santa Rosa Plateau area to this office. With help from Rancon realtors and their files, we were able to provide the information needed. TVFC received location requests for green grassy fields, old wooden barns, and working cattle or horse ranches. In all cases we were able to meet with the location scout and to provide the needed photo opportunities The locations manager for a new John Travolta movie came to Temecula looking for a street with eastem style houses with porches and non-Califomia trees. The plan was to close the street for three days and snow in the whole area. Photos were taken, and he retumed to the studio. Follow up indicated that Temecula was not the right location. We were contacted by DensuTech, a marketing firm for Japanese automobiles, to supply several on road photo locations - roads by a river, by a lake, straight roads, winding roads, in mountains, by cliffs and over a bridge. New photos were taken and sent to DensuTech. Photo shoot will be in Spring 2000. IEEP Film Commission referred a request for a two-story deserted or seemingly deserted farmhouse. Possible photo locations were faxed at their request. The City of Temecula forwarded a request for permitting and fee information to the TVFC. Stacy Sievek worked with the production people to meet their needs. E! Entertainment called requesting shirts and hats from the Temecula Film Festival to be worn on a future show about film festivals. Jo Moulton was able to fill their needs. MTV requested help in finding 25 local young people (over 18) to help with a segment of their new show '~Senseless Acts of Video" which reenacts exciting and exceptional portions of music videos. This segment was a helium balloon airlift. The filming took place locally, using the young people to fill the balloons and in a crowd scene as the balloons took off, stuntmen in tow. Photographer, Christopher Stoneman, requested referrals for local makeup persons. He was given four referrals and was pleased to get our help. We are collecting video clips of movies filmed in the Temecula area for the Inland Empire Tourism CounciFs upcoming marketing presentation. A copy of "Weekend in the Country", filmed in Temecula and co-staring many Temecula residents including Mayor Jeff Stone, was purchased to use in the Inland Empire Tourism Council's upcoming marketing presentation and for TVFC files. Three other locally filmed videos are also being acquired for our files. TVFC was contacted by Eddie Hunt, who was looking for a warehouse to rent for interior filming. Stacy Sievek met with Mr. Hunt and was able to find a Temecula warehouse. Hunt's movie, "In My Blood", filmed in Temecula for 5 days in February - the budget is $1000 a day. TVFC received a request for permitting information on night filming on the Overland Bridge. As this is a new venue, we are working v(~th the City's Planning Department to develop new guidelines. 2 one-day shoots for commercials were completed. Both shoots were conducted on private property. 2 days of commercials were shot in the Circuit City store at the Promenade mall by Propaganda Productions. Jeena Ryan a local video photographer will be contacting the City to produce a video on Temecula. She has just finished a video on Palm Springs for their Visitors Bureau. The TVFC has hired a part time Production Coordinator to answer calls and coordinate location and filming requests. The update and reprint of the Production Guide will be completed by June 2000. The TVFC website will be completed by the end of June with additional location sites be added each month. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G, Hughes, DimctorofPublicWorks/City Engineer May 23,2000 DepadmentofPublicWorks MonthlyActivity Repod RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of April 2000. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report April / May 2000 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: May 23, 2000 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First SWeet from Pujol Street to From Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Street, Front Street and Santiago Road will be signalized. Construction on this project started last February. The excavation of the center bridge pier is complete with the Cast In Drilled Hole (CIDH) pile drilling operations to begin the third week in May. The overexcavation and recompaction on the west and east side of First Street is complete and the bridge approaches are trader construction. The existing 8" sewer by-pass line was completed and a portion of the storm drain work has also been completed. 2. Pala Road Bridge The new Paia Road Bridge is now open to through traffic. Old bridge demolition has been completed. Retaining walFsoundwail at Rainbow Canyon/Pala is under construction. 3. Pujol Street Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter This project is now complete. The contractor completed all punchlist items, and a finai walkthrough was done. As soon as bonds are received, the project will be scheduled for acceptance by the City Cooaeil. 4. Pavement Management System FY99-16, Winchester Road This project is complete. The contractor completed all panehlist items. A final walkthrough will be done. As soon as bonds are received, the project will be scheduled for acceptance by the City Council. 5. Margarita Community Park Lighting and Fencing This project is almost complete. Contractor has completed the installation of the fence and the lighting fixtures for the hockey rink and tennis courts. A wallC_hrough inspection was conducted. The Contractor is presently performing final light fixture aiming for optimum illumination. Anticipated completion date: May 23, 2000. 6. Sports Park Tot Lot Equipment Replacement This project will replace the tot lot equipment at the Rancho Caiifomia Sports Park. Bids were opened on April 24, 2000. The lowest bidder was McLaughlin Engineering and Mining, Inc. with a bid amount of $92,187. The City Council awarded the contract at the May 9, 2000 meeting. The contract document is being prepared. R:XMonthlyActivityRepo~\CIP~2000~Apfil 7. Calle Aragon Park Drainage Structures Staff completed designing a storm drain line to cany normal drainage and nuisance water that accumulates at the park to the City's storm dram system and fix the drainage problem. Bids were opened on May 1 l, 2000. The lowest bidder was McLaughlin Engineering and Mining, Inc. with a bid of $75,000. The City Council is scheduled to award the contract on May 23, 2000. 8. Adding an Additional Lane On Ynez Road Between Tierra Vista and Rancho Vista and Widening the Southwest Corner of Margarita Road at Santiago Road Tins project will add a second southbound lane to Ynez Road between Tierra Vista and Rancho Vista. Widening the southwest comer of Margarita and Sanfiago was just added to this project. The informal bid process was utilized for this project. Request for bids were scot to five contractors. McLaughlin Engineering cod Mining, Inc., was the only contractor to submit a bid. The bid amount was $65,232. The City Council is scheduled to award the contract on May 23, 2000. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation Tins project will rehabilitate the parking lot for the Rancho California Sports Park. The old cracked pavement and portions of the curb will be removed and replaced with an adequate pavement section and some new curb. The City Council authorized the advertisement for bids at the May 9, 2000 meeting. Tins project is now being advertised for bids. Bids will be opened on June 1, 2000. This project must be constructed between 7/5 cod 8/15, when there are no major organized sport activities in the park. 2. FY 99- 2000 Slurry Seal Program Tins is a new project to slarry seal various streets in the Los Rancintos area between Rancho California Road and Pauba Road. The sluny seal includes the application of a Rubberized Polymer Modified Emulsion (RPME), crack sealing, traffic control and the removal and replacement of all traffic striping and stenciling. The City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids at the May 9, 2000 meeting. This project is now being advertised for bids. Construction bids will be opcoed on June 1, 2000. Sealing work is anticipated to begin in late Jane or early July. 3. Pavement Management System, Various Streets This is a new project to rehabilitate various sweets including Chardonnay Hills and Ynez Rd sou~h of Santiago Road. Pavement rehabilitation work is anticipated to begin in July. A geotechulcal investigation will be performed on the sireels designated for rehabilitation to determine the extent of rehabilitation required. The City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids at the May 9, 2000 meeting. This project is now being advertised for bids. Construction bids will be opened on June 1, 2000. 2 R:~MonthlyActlvityRepon\CIP\2000\Aprll PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road - Low-flow Crossing at Via Montezuma Preliminary discussion with USACOE and Riverside County Flood Control District has begun. The Construction window is from September through March due to environmental issues. An environmental consultant is reviewing the requirements for such a project. In addition, surveying of the project area has started and in-house design has been initiated. A hydrology study may be required. 2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Rancho California Road. The design process started. Areas to be rehabilitated will be identified. Plans and Specifications will then be completed. Construction is expected to start in September 2000. 3. Old Town Parking Lots Thisprojectconsistsoftwoproposedparkinglots. OnewillbelocatedonthewestsideofFrontStreetjustnorth of Second Street, and the other lot is located on the south side of Fou~h Street west of Front Street. The project is currently being designed in-house. A landscape architect and an electrical consultant are being utilized to do the specialty work. The design for the Second Street parking lot is almost complete. Awaiting 90% submittal of landscape and clecWic design. This project is scheduled to be advertised for bids in late May 2000. Design for Fourth Street Parking Lot is on hold pending the Mercantile building plans. 4. Diaz Road Realignment The consultant presented to the City two different alignments for Diaz as it approaches Rancho California Road, Staff reviewed the available three alignment choices (one from a previous study) and gave the consultant direction on the preferred alternative. The consultant submitted 30% completed plans based on staff direction. Staff completed a traffic circulation and right of way impact analysis and a preferred alignment has been established. Staff continues to hold individual meetings with affected property owners to present to them the new alignment, its impacts to their properties, and to address their concerns. The consultant was directed to proceed with the design. The designer is currently preparing the improvement plans for 70% submittal. Design completion is expected in June 2000. 5. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road The consultant completed 70% plans and submitted them to the City. Staff reviewed these plans and provided the consultant with input and comments on many issues that were raised. 90% plans are due at the end of May. A minor delay is expected due to utility and developer's (Home Depot) coordination. The consultant is also potholing existing utilities to determine their exact location. The City intends to back charge the utility companies for the cost of the potholing. The consultant will finalize the design and submit it to the City. Design completion is expected in Jane 2000. 6. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase H of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane at Winchester Road project. This project will widen the 1-15 3 R:XMonthlyActivityRepofi\CIP\2000\April southbound off-ramp at the Santa Gettrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the freeway just no~h of Winchester Road, The design consultant submitted the 1~t plan check to the City and Caltrans the first week of Janumy. Staff is reviewed the plans and provided the consultant with input. Caltrans Division of Structures in Sacramento is reviewing the plans. 7. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley The consultant submitted 90% final plans for both tratT~c signals and the proposed striping plans. Staff is reviewing these plans and in the process of preparing specifications and bid documents for this project. This project will be advertised for bids in June. 8. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) Design of this project is proceeding as scheduled. Preliminary design work include gcotechnical investigation, environmental assessment, surveying and utility research. In addition, staff is coordinating the work with the Pechangas and Spring Pacific Properties, the developer for Wolf Creek. The City's design consultant, DMJM, submitted 30% plans on May 1, 2000. Staff reviewed the plans and provided the consultant with comments. The design is to be completed in August 2000. The project is funded for design only at this time. 9. Pala Road Interim Improvements - C, Videning to accommodate four lanes from bridge to Wolff Valley) The interim road widening will be done as part of the Pechanga sewer line construction. An encroachment Permit was issued to the Pechangas for the sewer line. The City provided the contractor with stations and elevations of the new edge of pavement for Pala Road. DMJM, the City's design consultant for the Pala Road Phase II project, is assisting the City with the design from Loma Umda Road to Muirfield Drive. The Construction plans are now complete and Murrieta Development Corporation will be constructing the new sewer line/pavement section from Muirfield Drive to Wolf Valley Road. Construction will start in late May. 10. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center Under this project, the two median openings at Target and at the Claim Jumper will be closed and the left turn pockets at Town Center and the church will be lengthened. Design completion is expected in June 200C 11. Sports Park Pond Desiltation This project will clean up the Desiltation Pond in the Sports Park by removing the silt to allow proper drainage downstream. The consultant, Armstrong Development Services, is currently making their t'mal revisions to the design plans. This project is scheduled to be advertised for bids in June 2000. 12. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (West of Margarita to just west of Showalter) This project will widen Pauba Road to its ultimate width from just west of Margarita Road to just west of Showalter. This segment of the street includes the widening along the proposed new library. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was sent to qualified consultants on April 18, 2000 and responses were received on May 1, 2000. Negotiations are underway with the consultant who was determined to be the most qualified to do this project. Work ~vill be coordinated with design of the library project. Funding may need to be accelerated. 13. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include and addition of 3000 square feet of building area for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. The architect has completed the conceptual design. This conceptual design was presented to the 4 R:MMonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2000\Aprll Community Services Commission on May 8m and is to be presented to the City Cotmoil on May 23, 2000. Design completion is expected in August 2000. 14. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. Design is progressing on schedule. The theme of the building, the building layout, building form, and furniture layout were approved by the design committee. The committee has come to consensus on the colors to be used for the building exterior, building interior and carpelrag. The design committee is in the process of choosing the different type of furniture required for the library. Design is scheduled for completion in July 2000. 15. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool A swimming pool will be constructed inside Chapanal High School. The kick-off meeting for the design committee, including the architect RKM Design Group, City staff, School District staff and the swim club, was held on January 11, 2000. A community workshop was held on February 12, 2000 at the high school. A tour of a number of aquatic facilities was conducted on March 1, 2000. The Temecula Valley Unified School District Board has elected to work with the City of Temecula to construct and operate a 25 Yard x 25 Meter aquatic facility at Chapanal High School. The facility would include a smaller recreational pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. The master planning and design process started. 5 R:~Mon~hlyAc~vityRepor~ClP\20OO~April 0 C) aa ~, I- Z 0 W 0 0 ~~ ~ i~z _ TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~)e2Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent May 3, 2000 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - April, 2000 The following activities were performed by Public Wonks Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of April, 2000: I. SIGNS A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired 32 55 4 4 4~090 57 195 -0- 27 3~360 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B, Total Tons IV. V= VI. VII. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F, STENCILING A. .238 New and repainted legends B. 585 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 47 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 42 service order requests for the month of March, 2000. The Maintenance Crow has also put in 78 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 2000 was $18,142.70 compared to $ 37~634.50 for the month of March, 2000. Account No. 5402 $ 17,542.70 Account No. 5401 $ 600.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - CC: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works All Moghadam, Senior Engineer (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development) STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of April, 2000 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: Date: 04/00 # 5402 WEST COAST ARBORISTS CITYWIDE R.O.W. TREE TRIMMING TRIMMED 289 R.O,W. TREES CONTRACTOR: Date: 04/06/00 # 5402 BECKER ENGINEERING RANCHO VISTA EAST OF MARGAR1TA TOTALCOST $9,947.70 R & R A.C. FAILURES AND BACK FILL WITH ONE SACK SLURKY CONTRACTOR: Date: 04/27/00 # 5402 RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT DIAZ ROAD TOTAL COST $4,900.00 DEBRIS REMOVAL AND R,O.W. WEED SPRAYING CONTRACTOR: Date: 04/13/00 # 5401 HOUSTON HARRIS RANCHO VISTA @ SOUTHERN CROSS WINCHESTER @ JEFFERSON TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 TOTALCOST $2,695.00 CLEAN & CHASE 4 CATCH BASINS TOTALCOST $ 600.00 $ 17,542.70 $ -0- $ 600.00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF APRIL, 2000 DATE REC'D 03/14/00 03/29/00 03/31/00 03/31/00 04/02/00 04/03/00 04/03/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/05/00 04/05/00 04/05/00 04/06/00 04/07/00 04/07/00 04/10/00 04/10/00 04/I 0/00 04/11/00 04/11/00 04/11/00 04/12/00 04/12/00 LOCATION MARGARITA NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA 30445 LA PRESA LOOP BEHIND 27777 TIERRA VISTA EAST OF MARGARITA ON PAUBA 39395 CANYON RIM CIRCLE 32064 PINOT BLANC 29414 VIA NORTE MADISON AT GOLF DRIVING RANGE MARGARITA-WINCHESTER TO MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD 30365 CALLE HALCON 32085 CALLE MARQUIS 30538 MOONTIDE COURT 42078 SWEET SHADE LANE 33320 HWY 79 SO. REDHAWK PARKWAY AT BRIDGE MARGARITA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BOGART PLACE AT PAUMA VALLEY 27777 TIERRA VISTA 27578 ROSEBAY COURT 42176 LYNDIE LANE 29826 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL 45660 CLASSIC WAY LOMA LINDA AT VIA DEL CORONADO 31250 CORTE ALHAMBRA DATE REQUEST WORK COMPLETED MANHOLE COVER 04/03/00 DEBRIS 04/0300 TREE 04/04/00 SIGN 04/03/00 SIDEWALK 04/03/00 LANDSCAPING 04/03/00 DRAINAGE IN GUTTER 04/03/00 DEBRIS 04/04/00 DEBRIS 04/04/00 DEBRIS 04/04/00 AC GUTTER 04/04/00 TREE 04/0500 TREE 04/05/00 TREE 04/06/00 DEBRIS REMOVAL 04/06/00 GRAFFITI 04/07/00 WEED ABATEMENT 04/07/00 SlGN REPAIR 04/10/00 TREE REMOVAL 04/10/00 TREE REMOVAL 04/10/00 SIGN REPAIR 04/11/00 SIGN REPAIR 04/I 1/00 TREE TRIMMING 04/11/00 GRAFFITI 04/12/00 TREE & SIDEWALK REPAIR 04/17/00 DATE REC'D 04/12/00 04/12/00 04/14/00 04/17/00 04/17/00 04/19/00 04/19/00 04/19/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/24/00 04/25/00 04/25/00 04/25/00 04/25/00 04/26/00 04/26/00 04/26/00 04/27/00 LOCATION 40612 WINDSOR ROAD NORTHBOUND YNEZ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD 40312 WINDSOR ROAD LOLITA AND PAULITA TOWER CENTER AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD 42343 VIA CONSUELA 43550 JOHN WARNER ROAD 41844 4TM STREET 43780 PAULITA 43843 PAULITA 27415 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST 31045 VIA GILBERTO 29779 MAR HILL CIRCLE 45015 CORTE CHR1STINA 30800 LOLITA ROAD 43053 MARGARITA 30800 LOLITA ROAD 41437 CHENIN BLANC COURT 42820 VILLA TERRACE 40685 LA COLIMA 31009 CORTE ARROYO VISTA DE PORTOLA AT VIA ANGELES DATE REQUEST WORK COMPLETED SIDEWALK 04/17/00 POTHOLE 04/12/00 CONCRETE 04/17/00 DIRT ROAD 04/17/00 STREET NAME SIGN 04/18/00 TREE 04/19/00 DIRT ROAD 04/20/00 DEBRIS 04/19/00 DIRT ROAD 04/20/00 DIRT ROAD 04/20/00 LAWN NOT MOWED 04/20/00 TREE TRIMMING 04/20/00 DEBRIS PICK-UP 04/20/00 HYDRAULIC SPILL 04/24/00 ROAD GRADING 04/25/00 DEBRIS PICK-UP 04/25/00 ROAD GRADING 04/25/00 TREE CONCERN 04/25/00 TREE DONATION 04/26/00 OPEN TRENCH 04/26/00 HYDRAULIC SPILL 04/26/00 MISSING MANHOLE COVER 04/27/00 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 47 DATE 04/04/00 04/07/00 04/10/00 04/I 0/00 04/10/00 04/12/00 04/13/00 04/13/00 04/14/00 04/14/00 04/17/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/21/00 04/21/00 04i24/00 04/24/00 04/25/00 04,26/00 04i27/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF APRIL, 2000 LOCATION COUNTRY GLEN AT 79S. OLD TOWN TIRE REDHAWK PARKWAY "BRIDGE: 1-15 AT NORTHBOUND ON RAMP HWY. 79S. MARGARITA ROAD AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BRIDGE LOMA LINDA AT VIA DEL CORONADO (4 LOCATIONS) SANTIAGO ROAD AT "C' STREET 1-15 NORTH OF HWY. 79S 29275 SANTIAGO TARGET CENTER "EMPIRE CREEK" WINCHESTER AT DIAZ TARGET CENTER WINCHESTER AT DIAZ MORAGA BTWN. RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & MARGARITA RAINBOW CANYON ROAD TEMECULA CREEK 41005 WINCHESTER ROAD LOMA LINDA AT VIA DEL CORONADO VIA DEL CORONADO AT LOMA LINDA PALA ROAD AT WOLF VALLEY LIEFER ROAD AT BRIDGE LOMA LINDA PARK 6TM STREET AT TEXAS LILS' 44618 PALA ROAD PALA ROAD AT LOMA LINDA WORK COMPLETED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED TOTAL LOCATIONS 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 44 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 6 S.F. OF GRAFFtTI 389 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 250 S.F. OF GRAFF1TI 864 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1251 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 20 S.F. OF GRAFF1TI 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 8 S.F. OF GRAFF1TI 9 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 124 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 280 S.F. OF GRAFFIT1 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 27 3~360 Z 01 ~0 I~. ~ tl) ~' M t~l ,t- O DATE 04/03/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/05/00 04/05/00 04/06/00 04/I 0/00 04/11/00 04/12/00 ~04/17/00 04/I 7/00 04/17/00 04/17/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/19/00 04/20/00 04/21/00 04/26/00 04/27/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS LOCATION MONTH OFAPRIL, 2000. SCOPE OF WORK RAINBOW CANYON COLINA VERDE AT ESTERO 30365 CALLE HALCON 30365 CALLE HALCON MARGARITA 600' SOUTH OF MORAGA 30313 VIA HALCON 6TM STREET BETWEEN PUJOL & FELIX VALDEZ MARGARITA NORTH OF WINCHESTER MARGARITA NORTH OF WINCHESTER RANCHO VISTA WEST OF AVENIDA DELLA REINA VILLA ACTURAS @ CALLE HALCON CALLE HALCON AT ELINDA 30307 VIA BRISA 30290 VIA BRISA 30318 VIA BRISA VILLA DEL SUN AT DE PORTOLA MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA RAINBOW CANYON ROAD RANCHO VISTA ACROSS FROM HIGH SCHOOL NICOLAS ROAD MARGAR1TA 100' NORTH OF DE PORTOLA 30367 VIA CANADA CITYWIDE VIA CANADA 30367 VIA CANADA E/P REPAIR AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY R&R AC POTHOLE (TEMP AC) AC OVERLAY POTHOLE R&R AC AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY AC OVERLAY POTHOLE (TEMP AC) POTHOLE (TEMP AC) POTHOLE (TEMP AC) POTHOLE (TEMP AC) POTHOLE (TEMP AC) POTHOLE (TEMP AC) R&R AC POTHOLE REPAIRS AC OVERLAY R&R A.C. TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS TOTAL TONS S.F. 208 156 217 58 3 192 9 419 553 110 212 225 12 12 144 4 32 6 4 80 21 459 32 490 432 4~090 57 TOTAL TONS 3.5 3.5 1.5 6.5 4.5 3.5 3 3.5 TEMP A.C. 10.5 TEMP A.C. 6.5 10.5 DATE 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/12/00 04/13/00 04/14/00 04/14/00 04/17/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/24/00 04/25/00 04/26/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF APRIL, 2000 LOCATION CORBIE STREET AT NANTES COURT CORBIE STREET AT NANTES COURT AREA #1 AREA # 1 STATION 12 STATION 12 AREA #1 AREA #1 CITY HALL AREA # I AREA #1 AREA #1 WORK COMPLETED PAINT RED CURB PAINT CROSSWALK REPA1NTED REPAINTED REPAINTED PAINT REPAINT REPA1NT REPA1NT REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED 335 LN. FT. 1 26 LEGENDS 44 LEGENDS 250' PARK1NG STALLS 5 FIRE LANE LEGENDS 41 LEGENDS 21 LEGENDS HANDICAP PARKING (2) 49 LEGENDS 35 LEGENDS 14 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 238 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 585 DATE 04/05/00 04/06/00 04/10/00 04/11/00 04/14/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/19/00 AREA 4 AREA 4 AREA 4 AREA 4 AREA 2 CITYWIDE AREA 4 AREA 4 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF APRIL, 2000 LOCATION WORK COMPLETED CLEANED & CHECKED 26 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 37 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 37 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 9 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 22 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 44 CATCH BASINS 195 TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED DATE 04/03/00 04/03/00 04/05/00 04/06/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF APRIL, 2000 LOCATION MARGARITA ROAD RANCHO VISTA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY RANCHO VISTA AT MARGARITA CALLE PANTANO AT CALLE FUEGO WORK COMPLETED TRIMMED TRIMMED TRIMMED TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 4 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF APRIL, 2000 DATE 04/03/00 04/03/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/05/00 04/05/00 04/06/00 04/10/00 04/11/00 04/11/00 04/11/00 04/11/00 04/12/00 04/12/00 04/12/00 04/12/00 04/12/00 04/12/00 04/13/00 04/13/00 04/17/00 LOCATION CITY HALL PAUBA EAST OF MARGARITA 43523 TYLMAN STREET CORBIE STREET AT MODENA DRIVE CORBIE STREET AT NAUTES COURT CALLE AVELLAE AT VIA ARIAS YNEZ SOUTH OF RANCHO HIGHLNDS RUSTIC GLEN AT KNOLLRIDGE WINCHESTER AT ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH PAUMA VALLEY WAY AT BOGART 41955 MARGARITA MARGARITA WEST OF MEADOWS LYNDIE LANE RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA STATION #12 PAUBA EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY RANCHO VISTA EAST OF MIRA LOMA NO. GENERAL KEARNEY EAST OF MARGARITA CAM1NO ROMO CAMINO VILLOSA MARGARITA SOUTH OF PAUBA BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT DE PORTOLA CORTE VILLOSA WORK COMPLETED REPLACE EMPLOYEE OF MONTH SIGN 1 REPLACE R-18 (DAMAGED) 1 INSTALL W-63, W~65 1, 1 INSTALL W-63, W-65 1, 1 INSTALL W-66, W-66A 2, 2 REPAIR STREET NAME SIGN 2 INSTALL ADOPT A STREET SIGN 1 REPAIR SIGN 1 REPLACE TYPE N YELLOW I REPLACE R-1 FADED REPAIRED R-10 REPLACED W- 17 REPLACED W-53 REPLACED R-2 "45" REPLACED 3 R-26 INSTALLED W-63 REPLACED G-36 REPLACED R26A REPLACED W63 & W65 INSTALLED W63 & W65 INSTALLED R2 "45" INSTALLED ? SW5 INSTALL W-66, W-66A DATE 04/17/00 04/17/00 04/18/00 04/I 8/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/19/00 04/20/00 04/24/00 04/24/00 04/25/00 04/25/00 04/27/00 04/27/00 LOCATION MIRA LOMA & RANCHO VISTA PAUBA AT STATION 84 WINCHESTER AT D1AZ DE PORTOLA AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD RANCHO VISTA AND MEADOWS PARKWAY YUKON AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD VIA PUESTA DEL SOL AT VIA CUESTA AL SOL PALA ROAD 300~ SOUTH OF WOLF VALLEY LA SEKENA WAY AT MEADOWS PARKWAY CALLE GIRASOL EAST OF NICHOLAS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT 1-15 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD @ TARGET CENTER CORTE BRAVO AT VIA CORDOBA VIA CORDOBA AT CORTE BELLA DONNA WORK COMPLETED INSTALL TYPE GLUE DOWDS "1" INSTALL R-2-45 REPLACE R-1 "DAMAGED" REPLACE W-53 "1" & TYPE N RED "1' REPAIR W-63 "1" REPLACE R-I "DAMAGED REPAIR STREET NAME SIGN "2" REPLACE W-41 MISSING INSTALLED 32 TYPE"Q" REPLACED W-81 REPLACED 8 TYPE 2 & 5 TYPE K REPLACED TYPE K INSTALLED 2 R-I INSTALLED 2 R-1 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 32 55 4 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager May 23, 2000 Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department in the month of April, 2000. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 42 new applications for administrative, other minor cases and home occupations and 5 new applications for public hearings during the month of March. The new public hearing cases are as follows: Change of Zone General Plan Amendment Parcel Map Massage Establishment Pre-applications , A single family residence map for planning areas 6A and 6B of the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan, designed for multi-family density. Status of Major Projects Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and get the following cases ready for public hearing before the Community Development Director or Planning Commission: Harveston (Formally known as Sweetwater - Lennar Communities) Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Development Agreement- located northerly of Santa Gertrudis Creek and west of Chapparal High School. Project is currently under review. -, Rancho Community Church expansion on Vallejo Avenue. The project is on hold, as the applicant is still looking at other options for their development. The applicant met with staff in January to discuss potential options. F:\Depts\PLANNING\MONTHLY.RPT\2000~APRIL 2000.dec 1 Tentative Parcel Map 28627, the Margarita Canyon Property. The Planning Commission approved the project at its March 15, 2000 meeting. The appeal by the applicant and the neighboring property owners to the south has been scheduled for the May 9, 2000 City Council meeting. Wolf Valley Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, and Tentative Tract Map - A Development Agreement application has been filed for this project. Staff is reviewing the Development Agreement and EIR response to comments. Tentative Planning Commission date is pending in Spring, 2000. Tentative Map 29305 - To create legal parcels for each Planning Area, Pala Drainage Channel and the linear park within the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: At the April 25th meeting the City Council made a determination to hold off processing the project pending the results of an independent feasibility study which will analyze the viability of the formation of an assessment district for the construction of off-site infrastructure. Meadowview Golf Course - The design, construction and operation of an 18 hole public golf course with dubhouse, cart barn, maintenance and other accessory buildings and an equestrian trail park located on 297 acres south of Nicolas Road, north of Del Rey Road, east of Margarita Road and west of Calle Medusa, within the Meadowview Community. Staff completed and circulated the initial Environmental Assessment for the project for 30- day review. Project has been noticed for the Planning Commission on June 7, 2000. Temecula Village - The proposal is for a General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay zone, Parcel Map and Development Plan for 23 acres located on the south side of Rancho California Road, between Moraga Road and Cosmic Drive. Applications filed on August 1999 have been withdrawn. A new application is being submitted. Temecula Ridge Apartments - The design and construction of 246 apartment units on 22.21 acres on the south side of Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. Planning Commission continued the case from May 3, to June 7, 2000. Temecula Gas Station and Car Wash - To construct and operate a self-serve gas station and drive-thru car wash facility located on the southwest corner of the intersection of the proposed Western Bypass and Front Street. Project is on hold pending outcome of Margarita Canyon Map. Awaiting City Council appeal outcome. Quaid Harley Davidson - The design, construction and operation of a 17,371 square foot Harley Davidson motorcycle dealership with sales and repairs located on the north side of Front Street, approximately 1,800 feetwest ofthe Interstate 15 Freeway on-ramp. Staff is in the process of reviewing the re-submittal. Christ the Vine Church - To design, construct and operate a 6,258 square foot church, 643 square foot two car garage, 7,499 square foot day school and 5,628 square foot fellowship hall on 2.62 net acres located on North General Kearny Road and Margarita Road. Applicant has resubmitted hearing exhibits. Awaiting Planning Commission dates. Provident Savings Bank - To construct and operate a 3,000 square foot Provident Savings Bank with drive-thru services in the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road. DRC meeting was held on October 21, 1999. Re-submittal received on March 24, 2000. F:\Depts\pLANNING\MONTHLY,RPT%2000%APRIL 2000.doc 2 Childtime Children's Center - To develop a .978 acre of vacant land within the C-A zone with a 8,000 square foot building to be utilized as a child care center located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Margarita Road and Verdes Lane. Approved at Director's Hearing on February 3, 2000. It has been brought to staff's attention that applicant didn't notice adjacent property owner. Conditions of Approval have been revised to address Home Owner's Association concerns and conflicts have been resolved. Hilton Garden Hotel - To construct a 100-unit hotel on 1.38 acres located on the westerly side of Rancho Highland Drive, westerly of Ynez Road. The accompanying General Plan Amendment is on hold with the Planning Commission. Resubmitted on May 11, 2000. Temecula Creek Inn - A request to expand by adding two new buildings to expand the hotel's room capacity and conference room facilities located at 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road. DRC meeting was held on December 9, 1999. Staff received re-submittal on February 14, 2000. Scheduled for Planning Commission June 7, 2000. Lundstrom and Associates - To develop a 4.72-acre site with three speculative industrial buildings totaling 57,103 square feet located on Business Park Drive and Rancho Way. DRC meeting was held on December30, 1999. Applicant has resubmitted hearing exhibits; scheduled for May 3, 2000 Planning Commission. Avoca Enterprises - To construct a 25,201 square foot commercial building on 1.22 acres of vacant land within the Light Industrial Zone located at 42506 Avenida Alvaratio. DRC meeting was held on January 20, 2000. Applicant re-submitted; staff is reviewing and awaiting Conditions of Approval. Waiting for applicant to submit exhibits for Planning Commission, once received case can be scheduled for hearing. Overland Self Storage - Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the design, construction and operation of a 43,174 square foot mini-self storage facility with office, resident manager's quarters and RV storage spaces located approximately 155 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. Palomar Hotel - Remodel of the existing Palomar Hotel to the Palomar Inn (a bed and breakfast) located on the northeast corner of Front and Fifth Streets. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. Ridge Park Office Center -the design, construction and operation of a 56,000 square foot office complex consisting of 10 buildings on 4 acres along the north side of Ridge Park Drive, between Rancho California Road and Vincent Moraga. Project tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission June 7, 2000. Tentative Tract Map 29133 - Subdivide 5 acres into eight residential lots locate on the west- side of Ynez Road south of Calie Halcon. Approved at Planning Commission on April 19, 2000. Encinitas Corporate Center - To develop a 1.9 acre site in the Light Industrial Zone with a two story, 32,500 square foot, tilt-up concrete speculative industrial building located at 42545 Rio Nedo. DRC meeting was held on February 24, 2000. Re-submittal received on March 23, 2000. Scheduled for Planning Commission on June 7, 2000. Tentative Tract Map No. 24136 Amendment No. 3 for single family residence on the site with a total of 335 lots on 100.8 acres. F:\Depts\PLANNING\MONTHLY.RPT~.000~APRIL 2000.doc 3 Tentative Parcel Map No. 29532, a one-lot commercial condominium at 27310 Madison Ave has been withdrawn. Original Roadhouse Grill - To build a 7,120 square foot restaurant locate at the mall along Ynez Road. To be scheduled for Planning Commission in June. Southern California Storage - To build a 65,000 square foot self-storage facility intending to serve the commercial and industrial businesses. Located on Winchester Road west of Diaz Road. Awaiting resubmittal of revised plans. Massage Establishment Permits Staff is still working with the Police Department to finalize the procedures for Massage Establishment Permits. Tiffanies Way located at 27625 Jefferson Road is requesting the approval of a permit transfer. Staff is awaiting for a response from the Police Department concerning this application. Stressed-Out Management located at 41790 Winchester Road is requesting approval of a permit transfer. Staff has received the requested information on the transfer of the business and is waiting for information from the Police Department. Temecula Day Spa proposed at 40420 Winchester Road. Staff has received some of the clearances from the Police Department and expects to approve the application next month. Executive Massage Consultant located at 41415 Enterprise Circle North has just submitted an application Small -k Business Assistance Rhythm and Brews: Staff worked with the owner of this proposed Old Town business and advised him on how to resolve several problems with his plan check for a new brew pub in Old Town. The owner is working with an architect who is developing new design suggestions for this project. Israel Gonzalez (Mexican Artifacts): Staff advised this applicant regarding his site plan, fencing, landscaping and potential sign. Aided him in filling out his development application and helped him prepare for the Old Town Local Review Board. Adobe Plaza: Helped applicant in preparing a sign program for this Old Town shopping center which will soon undergo a fa(2ade improvement. Union 76: Staff met on-site with corporate representatives and advised them regarding landscaping deficiencies that need to be corrected prior in order to release their cash deposit. Advised landscaping contractor about his remedial planting proposal. Texace/L and M Tire: Helped applicant obtain refund from the Finance Department in order to release their landscaping deposit. F:\DeptS\PLANNING\MONTHLY.RPT~2000~APRIL 2000.doc 4 Coordinating Committee: Staff held its quarterly meeting with member of the Temecula development community on April 24th. Updates from Planning, Building & Safety, Fire and Public Works were given. Country Porch Antiques: Staff worked with this Old Town merchant in designing signs for his new antique mall. Special Events Permits Western Days: Worked with consultant and advised her regarding site plan design, insurance and timelines for approval. Frontier Days Rodeo: Processed application from the Temecula Town Association and transmitted copies to city departments and the Riverside County Health Department for comments and conditions. Design House 2000 Sign Program: Advised and helped applicant secure permits for off-site signs for this community event. Northwest Sports Park: Staff prepared preliminary applications and conditions for temporary use permits for possible midget car and motorcycle races. These events are on hold pending further information on noise attenuation. -k Taste of the World: Advised and helped the Sister Cities Association prepare an application and site plans for this event which was held at Tower Plaza. Special Projects & Long Range Planning Activities The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities are as follows: Housing Element Update: The City has received a draft of the City's Regional Housing Need Assessment obligations and staff has provided corrections to the text. A preliminary meeting date in the spring of 2000 is planned to inform the City Council of the results now that the Growth Management Action Plan has been adopted by the Council. Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: The consultant has gathered much of the information needed to begin preparation of the Draft EIR. The Circulation Element traffic study is currently being revised due to recent land use changes within the County which may affect the analysis of the SEIR therefore, pending the outcome of the revisions to the Circulation Element and additional staff, the Redevelopment Plan EIR is on hold. General Ran Circulation Element Update: Due to regional land-use changes and internal City needs. The Circulation Element update will be re-activated as part of, and integrated into, the comprehensive General Plan update. Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop in the spring of 2000. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. F:\DeptS\pLANNING\MONTHLY.RPT~.000~APRIL 2000.doc 5 Vail Ranch Annexation: Staff submitted the annexation application to LAFCO on May 8, 2000. LAFCO has indicated that the item could potentially be set for a public hearing before the LAFCO Board at their August meeting. Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Geographic Information System (GIS): Recent mapping products include base maps for Building & Safety, Fire and Police Departments, listing map for Economic Development, Westside DIF agreement for Public Works, and county area zoning map for Planning. GIS data reports were produced for Fire Department (Commercial/industrial) and Finance Department (CFD 8812). Staff has prepared other various data analyses and mapping requests. Staff continues to work with the County and Environmental Systems Research Institute to bring the MapObjects system online. Staff is work with Information Systems and the Fire Department on an upcoming pilot project to implement a routing and pre-plan system (MaxResponder). Antenna Ordinance: Staff has circulated drafts of the proposed ordinance and has received copies from several telecommunication industry representatives. The Ordinance has been set for Planning Commission hearing in May, 2000. The ordinance will follow shortly to the Council. Application Fee Study: Staff recently received a study from the consultant and has provided information to the consultant and Finance Department about which applications should not be charged the full-cost of processing. However, the latest draft has a number of errors that still need to be corrected. Hillside Development Policy: The policies are being examined for integration into the draft grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County: Councilman Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee meetings and monitoring the process of determining conservation reserve needs. Comments regarding these meetings are presented during Council Business on the last meeting of the month. Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance: The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 meeting. Based upon the Commission direction, staff will be making additional changes to the Ordinances in the next few months. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Citywide Sign Inventory: The process of inventcrying signs is pending additional staff resources. County Project Reviews: Staff continues to allocate significant resources to review projects within the County and other local jurisdictions that could effect the City of Temecula. Information regarding these projects will be forwarded under separate cover labeled Projects of Concern. Helium Balloon Ordinance Amendment: As directed by the City Council, this item will be scheduled for the Planning Commission later this year. F:\Depts\PLANNING\MONTHLY.RPT~2000~APRIL 2000,doc 6 General Plan Annual Report: Staff is reviewing the implementation measures from the General Plan and preparing to meet with the other departments and the City Council Subcommittee. Southside Specific Ran: This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Other General Plan Amendments. Two Circulation Element Amendments have been proposed. A revised Circulation Element traffic analysis will be used to consider both requests. Both requests am currently under review by the Planning and Public Works Departments. A Proposal to reduce the width of the Western Bypass Road north of Avenida AIvarado from a Secondary Roadway to a Principal Collector. A request to delete Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missiones from the Circulation Map F:\DeptS\PLANNING\MONTHLY.RPT~2000~APRIL 2000.doc 7 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mike Brown, City Fire Chief May 23, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of April, 2000. Month APRIL Temecula Fire Services Monthly Activity Statistics Year 2000 ~ACtVitY Structure Fires Vehicle Fires Vegetation Fires Other Fires Medical Aids Traffic Collisions False Alarms Fire Menace Standbys Public Service Assists Assists and Covers Totals: 3 14 t I 19 1 I 1 I 4 3 I 2 0 6 8 I 3 2 14 60 50 36 82 228 15 40 6 15 76 14 22 8 8 52 4 3 I 4 12 6 4 5 5 20 9 7 3 8 27 123 143 66 126 458 Community Activities I 0 0 0 School Programs I 0 0 3 4 Fairs and Displays 0 0 0 0 0 Company Inspections 91 20 0 10 121 LE-38 Dooryard Inspections 50 0 0 0 50 Fire Investigations 3 0 0 0 3 Burning Permits Issued 14 0 0 0 14 Preplans 0 2 2 4 8 I Totals: 160 22 2 17 201 By: Cad Calderon Date: 5/7/00 Form B15-1 (4/99) Total Runs for the month: MEDIC SQUAD 84 MONTHLY RESPONSE SUMMARY April 2000 214 Medical Aids 150 Traffic Collisions 37 Public Service Assists 3 Fire Menace Standby's 4 Structure Fires 4 Ringing Alarms 12 Vegetation Fires 0 Refuse Fires 2 Vehicle Fire 1 Hazmat 1 Average response time 4.3 minutes Longest response time 10 minutes Medic Squad Canceled Prior to Patient Contact: 30 Medical Aid Responses with Medic Squad 84 on scene prior to AMR: Performed Advanced Life Support prior to the arrival of AMR: 62 times 20 times Education and Training Programs: Science Classes Education program for Chaparral High School Health Comments: Medic Squad 84 responded to a total of 214 calls for the month of April 187 of those calls were for medical aids or TC's~ On medical aid or TC calls, the squad was cancried a total of 30 times prior to making patient contact or 16% of the time. The Medic Squad arrived on scene prior to AMR 62 times (33% of the time), and the same time as AMR 64 times (34% of the time). When the Medic Squad was on-scene prior to AMR, ALS interventions were initiated a total of 20 times. AMR units typically arrived on scene within 3.7 minutes of the Medic Squad making patient contact. On two occasions, the wait for an AMR unit to arrive was 10-11 minutes. The longest response by the Medic Squad was 10 minutes. CITY MANAGER CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDAREPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager ~'~ DATE: May 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of Apdl 2000. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inauide$ In the month of April, the City responded to 6 IEEP inquiries and 6 leads. A few of the leads consisted of a telephone sales & installation company, retailer and an entertainment company. Staff met with Mike Lewis of Deloitte & Touche on Apdl 3rd regarding relocation of a major uniform/laundry service. Site Visitations/Retention Meetinas Staff attended a site visit with Spectrum Technologies, an internet prorider, on Apdl 27~. The company's owner, Bob Ostrowski, also owns Temecula. Com. Staff attended the EDCSWRC Business Relations Committee on April 6t". Lisa Garcia-Gleissner, with the Riverside County EDA - ACCESS, was the Guest Speaker. Updates were also given by committee members on previous visitations. There were four successful site visits attended by other EDC members in Apdl. Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building can be found in the Community Development Department report. Media/Outreach Materials Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce Monthly Newsletter titled "Living Facilities, Senior Center Expansion, Recreational Opportunities, As Well As Job Training and Employment Programs, Benefit Temecula Seniors." Staff prepared information for the upcoming Business Press second annual Inland Empire City Guide. This glossy-covered publication will include information and data on the Inland Empire cities. Distribution includes 12,000 Business Press subscribers and another 3,000 will be distributed throughout the year. Jim O'Gredy met with Mike Freeman of the San Diego Union Tdbune on April 28th regarding an article on Temecula. Mr. Freeman also attended a meeting of Temecula CONNECT as part of his visit to Ternecula. Advertisin¢l The City advertised in the San Diego Newcomer & Relocation Guide, which was released last month. (see attached) The publication provides information on relocating to, doing business in and living in the San Diego area. The guide is distributed throughout the year by the San Diego Chamber, builders, developers, financial industry, human resource departments, public relations and other promotional programs. Over 40,000 prospects per year use this source as a reference. The City will also receive a complementary ad in the Greater San Diego's Guide to Business & Industry and our ad will be included on the website Book of Business.corn, which is developed by the San Diego Chamber and Hedtage Media Corp. These are great opportunities for Temecula to align with San Diego and tap into their business and labor market. Conference Staff attended the California Association of Local Economic Development (CALED) Spring Conference and Workshop that was held in San Diego on April 18 - 21. The conference attracted over 500 economic developers from across the State and Country and featured guest speaker Trade and Commerce Secretary Lon Hatamiya and a cadre of expert economic development practitioners and trainers. Me. etings Staff held its second post-event Rod Run mating on April 4th to finalize the proposed model conditions of approval from each City department for the Rod Run 2001 event. The conditions were presented to the Temecula Town Association at the time the organization met with the Economic Development Sub-committee to discuss their funding for FY2000-01. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council meeting on Apdl 12"'. Councilmember Mike Naggar was the Guest Speaker and he spoke on "The Importance of Manufacturing in the Temecuta Valley," The SRCMC will also be involved in the planning of the Chamber's Business Tech Expo in August. Jim O'Grady attended the Inland Empire Economic Partnership's Board of Directore Meeting on Apdl 13th. The Legislative Bill SB 1582 by Senator O'Connell was discussed. This is a companion bill to AB 2001, Lockheed's Space Port bill by Assemblyman Longville. This is an excellent bill that will provide incentives to the State. California is one of the sites being considered. This will bdng high-tech, high paying jobs to our area if chosen. IEEP members and IEEP have wdtten letters of support. IEEP reported that year-to-date there have been 23 site searches including two successes with efforts focusing in the high-tech industries, specifically biotech companies. The Small Business Development Center has seen 81 t clients in the first quarter of 2000 with $6.1 million impact. The Film Commission has had 1,000 requests for locations and 181 film shoots. A detailed activity report is attached for your review. On April 13th and 17th, staff met with the Economic Alliance regarding marketing activities and the development of its business brochure/kit. A major marketing effort will begin in May, and is described in the attached Alliance report. Jim O'Grady attended the dedication of a One-Stop Manufacturing Training Center in Hemet on Apdl 14'. This facility is integrated with the Workforce Development Center with twelve partners. Services to be provided will also include seniors. On April 14', Jim O'Grady met with George Rivere of JM Fiber Optics regarding installation of fiber-optic links in Temecula for residential and commercial customers. The Economic Development Sub-committee members and staff met on April 24t" and 25t" with the City Marketing Partners regarding their funding requests for FY2000-01. Recommendation of the Sub-committee will be reflected in the overall budget recommendation. Staff attended the Inland Empire Economic Partnership High Technology Initiative meeting on Apdl 25th. The IEEP announced that they will be more aggressive at high technology business development and wanted input from the Community Partners on areas they could contribute. IEEP's objectives include: attend scientific and high tech trade shows ,, develop a high tech website update industry profile slicks and include GiS maps individually match science and technology of high tech companies to local university sponsored research, and existing high tech companies with the intent of them relocating to the area Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting on Apdl 17'. Lisa Sato, President of The Resource Group made a presentation on the SW Riverside County 1999 Business Census Survey. Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Quarterly Membership Luncheon on Apdl 27m. Featured speakers included Patrick Murphy and Russell Murphy with Pechanga Development Corporation. Staff attended the Apdl 28' Temecula CONNECT meeting. Guest Speaker Gary Saner, President of ProSoff, spoke on the topic "Software Development for the Internet Age." On Apdl 27m, staff met with property owners and Councilmembers Roberts and Comerchero regarding a possible expansion of auto dealerships. The Temecula Valley Film Council has had a lot of activity this past year. They have put together a recap of their 1999-2000 accomplishments, which is attached for your review. TOURISM ,Media Channel 7's Eye on LA crew filmed April 1st and 2~a in Temecula. The show aired on May 6t", As a follow-up, Producer Lisa Renee Ramedz indicated that the station was happy as the Temecula segment experienced great ratings. Since Temecula was a strong opening, the rest of the show also experienced high ratings. Sometimes the show drops its ratings if the first segment is not strong enough to hold the viewer's attention. The City will receive a master copy and will have duplicates made. Western Association News highlighted the Inland Empire region in their April issue. Temecula was included as one of the featured destinations. Eadier this year staff had submitted press information, slides and hotel/winery contacts on our area. This is the West's only independent, monthly magazine for association executives and meeting planners (see attached). Staff received a call from Bobble Zane, a travel wdter that we have worked with previously. She wrote a Temecula chapter for the Quick Escapes to San Diego publication. She called to let us know that Temecula was included in the 2"~ edition and that it would be coming out soon. Staff will be making arrangements for her to tour Temecula and will show her the new attractions including the museum, Old Town improvements, Promenade, etc. This will be helpful as she works on the publication's 3'4 edition. She also writes for Yellow Brook Road Annual Guidebook. She is working on a piece called Kid Focus Tdps (travel w/families) and would like to write on Temecula. She previously wrote an article on the Cadsbad area and incorporated Lego Land. Pamela Balunk with the Austin American-Statesman in Austin, TX, contacted staff regarding an article they were writing on Wine County and the Temecula Creek Inn. Staff mentioned that we also have Histodc Old Town, a new museum, hot air ballooning, etc. which she was not aware of. A full press kit and slides were sent for her review and consideration. The Statesman is the fastest growing newspaper in Texas and has a circulation of 200,000. Mike Welsh, Publisher of California Magazine/Food & Beverage International Magazine is looking to do a possible co-op project with Temecula focusing on food/wine/travel. Articles and profiles would feature chefs, hotels and wineries in Temecula and then we would introduce shopping, Old Town and goff. Staff will be providing information to Mr, Walsh for consideration. Emily June with Touring & Tasting Magazine contacted staff regarding an article that will feature several Temecula wineries. Staff provided additional information and photography on the area. This is the #1 Toudng magazine, published twice a year with 50,000 copies pdnted. The magazine is geared to affluent, well-educated, well-traveled individuals. Distribution includes national bookstores, newstands, wine sale outlets, and can be found in 1,500 wine country hotels Tradeshow Staff coordinated with the San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau, Inland Empire Toudsm Council and the Chamber on exhibiting at the Los Angeles Times Travel Show held at the Los Angeles Convention Center in Apdl. Staff prepared photo display boards, trade show materials, giveaways, and decorations for both booths. The Chamber Tourism Council provided staffing. Outreach Materials The City has just released its new toudsm reck brochure. The brochure highlights the main tourism attractions, shopping and dining venues as well as special events that visitors can experience while in Temecula. Meetings/Leads Staff aftended the Chamber Toudsm and Visitors Council meeting on Apdl 6th. Ellen Watkins of the Theatre Foundation made a presentation on the proposed theater complex in Old Town. David Thompson, President of the Noon Rotary Club, made a presentation on a proposed Rotary Toudst Promotion with the Temecula Police Department, Francine Clave with the Ontario Police Department contacted Staff regarding organizing a Temecula trip for the wives of California Police Chiefs. There will be a conference held in February 2001 and the event planner is arranging a side tdp for the wives to include wine tasting, antiquing, museum tour and dining. Staff sent information and put them also in touch with the Vintners Association. For the past several years, the Maintenance Superintendents Association (MSA) has held their Secretaries Day Luncheon in Temecula. This year the event was held on Apdl 27th at Thornton Winery and it was very successful as 85 people attended. As host of the event, this allowed Temecula the opportunity to market itself to individuals within our region. Many of the tourism related businesses, retailers and special events provided donations for raffle pdzes. Attachments: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report, January - Mamh 2000 Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report Western Association News Article San Diego Newcomer & Relocation Guide Ad PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURIBM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS * CHAMBER REFERRALS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHIC8 OHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS CHAMBER REFERRALS TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR APRIL, 2000 Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month Total Year-To-Date 437 187 423 1107 2,154 1696 652 1701 5,054 9,103 119 89 1,685 200 4,247 N/A 612 343 8,070 738 18,866 N/A 175 152 85 890 173 139 831 134 2,579 277 24 4 211 1 0 1 27 545 1,496 718 354 3,945 672 547 3,925 554 12,211 132 88 85 305 533 409 392 1,334 N/A 44 31 87 162 THIS MONTH 4,247 3,124 305 162 N/A N/A 170 132 303 605 N/A YEAR-TO-DATE 18,866 12,211 1,334 6O5 2,342 8,614 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber Apdl, 1999 April, 2000 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 522 437 -16.28 Calendar of Events 117 187 59.83 Special Events 1,625 423 -73.97 General Information 1,272 1,107 -12.97 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 3,536 2, 154 -39.08 RELOCATION 358 119 -66.76 DEMOGRAPHICS 55 89 61.82 CHAMBER 1,954 1,685 -13.77 MISCELLANEOUS 110 200 81.82 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 6,013 4,247 -29.37 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 168 175 4.17 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 128 152 18.75 SPECIAL EVENTS 89 85 -4.49 GENERAL INFORMATION 684 890 30.12 RELOCATION 211 173 -18.01 DEMOGRAPHICS 54 139 157.41 CHAMBER 1001 831 -16.98 MISCELLANEOUS 48 134 179.17 VISITOR CENTER WALK-I NS 196 545 178.06 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,579 3,124 21.13 MAILINGS TOURISM 178 132 -25.84 RELOCATION 111 88 -20.72 DEMOGRAPHICS 115 85 -26.09 TOTAL MAILINGS 404 305 -24.50 E-MAIL TOURISM 26 44 69.23 RELOCATION 13 31 138.46 MISCELLANEOUS 46 87 89.13 TOTAL E-MAIL 85 162 90.59 N/A **WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS N/A * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls **New category relects Web-page requests OFFICERS Tony Turski Stadium Plzza Chairman of the Board Total Arbogast Inland Valley Regional Medical Center Ist Vice Chairman of the Board Kalherine Eiders Falibrook National Bank 2nd Vice Chairman ol the Board Janet S. Beck Certified Dennatician Secretary Lewis Ihndall North County Bank Treasurer DIRZ"C'I'OIS Kalherlne Aroa Backstree~ Dell & Game Emporium, Inc, PedlanBa Entertainment Roe Bradley Mklael Doblado hrry Fra.d., ~.D. The Staf~n~ Solution p~ Bell Mirala Smirk ABe Child Care Center Tees LiYs lvfesquie Grifi 2~Yne~ Road, #I 24 ~la, CA 92591 May 10, 2000 Shawn Nelson, City Mauager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Sha~q~: Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of April at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights 7 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet which includes information on demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc. Committee Highlights Tourism & Visitors Council: The May 4 TVC Reception was a huge success with over 50 community leaders, chamber board and industry leaders in attendance profiling the new direction ofthe Tourist & Visitors CounciL Committeemembers and staff attended the L. A. Times Register Show on April 291h & 30th in San Diego CONVIS Booth and at the Inland Empire Tourism Council Booth. Chamber staff is currently coordinating the City/Chamber Booth for the Balloon & Wine Festival. A Fam Tour is currently being coordinated for the month of October. Education Committee: The committee's book drive runs throughout the month of May. Books will be collected for the TVUSD's libraries. Book drop boxes (look for "Shangani" a South African serval cat) are located at Little Professor Book Co., Fallbrook National Bank, ABC Child Care Center, Dental Associates of Temecula, and JC Penhey. The committee continues to work with the video production class at Chaparral High School to film chamber businesses for their career libraries. Ways & Means Committee: The Inaugural Business to Business Technology Expo will be held on August 4, 2000 at the Pechanga Pavilion This Expo will provide information regarding e-Commerce solutions, infom~ation on high speed access. DSL as well as technology to protect your business and computer systems. Les Karr, Architecture Manager from [ntcl ~vill present a keynote address about the d3qmmic changes reshaping the world of business and how technology is evolving to meet tbose needs. Local Business Promotions Committee: The Shop Temecula First campaign will kick offon June l't. 75 businesses are participating in the lune campaign which will be highlighted in the 4th of July parade. The committee continues to reward excellent customer service and Chamber involvement through the Mystery Shopper and Business of the Month programs. Government Action Committee: The conunittee's next meeting is scheduled for May 20, 2000, at the Murrieta Chamber. The committee will continue to focus on reviewing legislation effecting the business community'. Membership Committee: Chamber staff and Ambassadors attended 10 Ribbon Cuttings the month of April. The Committee hosted a successrid Chamber Open House on Tuesday, April i 1, for all new members who joined in the last quarter. New members were introduced to Board of Directors, Ambassadors, Chairpersons and Staff. A new benefit packet is being designed. All TVCC members are now eligible for discounted health insurance. The comrmttee is still researching Worker's Compensation, Credit Union and AAA Club discounts. Approximately 20 business will be interviewed for a testimonial Membership Recruiting Video. Businesses will have the opporminty to explain why they are members and how has it benefited them. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 400 Temecula Brochures to Callaway Vineyard & Winery for distribution to guests. · 200 Winery Brochures, 100 Temecula Brochures, 150 Visitor Guides and 25 City Maps to TVCC's Weekend Visitors Center for distribution to tourists. · 250 Temecula Brochures, 150 City Maps and 30 Visitor Guides to Temecula Creek Inn for distribution to guests. · 200 Winery Brochures and 100 Visitor Guides to Century 21 Newsore for distribution to clients. · 200 Temecula Brochures and 95 Winery Brochures to Desert Hills Premium Outlet Center for distribution to visitors at the center. · 200 Visitor Guides and 200 One-page Street Maps to World Harvest Church for distribution at a conference in Temecula. · 160 Temecula Brochures 50 Winery Brochures to the International Information Center in San Diego for distribution to visitors. · i00 Temecula Brochures, 100 Visitor Guides, i00 Winery Brochures and 20 One-page Street Maps to Temecula Valley Inn for distribution to guests. · 100 School Brochures, 100 Temecula Brochures and 100 Visitor Guides to Temecula Valley Unified School District for distribution to new residents. · 100 Temecula Brochures to the Puma Valley Country Club for distribution to guests and potential members. · 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Tickets and Tours for distribution to guests coming to Temecula. · 50 One-page Street Maps, 26 City Maps, 20 Winery Brochures and 18 Visitor Guides to Krieger's for distribution to visitors. · 35 Tcmecula Brochures, 35 Visitor Guides and 35 Winery Brochures to Pechanga for distribution to guests. · 30 Visitor Guides to Century 21 Wright fBr distribution at a seminar. · 30 Tcmecula Brochures, 30 Winery Brochures and 20 Visitor Guides to Century 21 Newsome Realty for distribotion to clicnts. · 25 City Maps, 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to Scico lotemational Trading Co., Ltd. For distribution to Japanese business people coming to Tcmecula. · 25 Tcmccola Brochures, 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to Rancho Springs Mcdical Center for distribotion at a physician recruitment. · 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Wincry Guides to thc Mission inn fix distribution to tourists. · 20 City Maps to Pasco Dcl Sol fix distributioo to new residents. 12 Visitor Guides to Renaissance Esmeralda Resort for distribution to guests. 10 Temecula Brochures, 10 Visitor Guides and 10 Winery Brochures to Sharondale Roadrunners for distribution to a RV group visiting Temecula in June. Marketing Highlights · Chamber staff provided area festival information and manned a Temecula table at "Fabulous Fairs & Festivals of the Inland Empire" on May 3. This event was created to highlight the importance of Tourism in the Inland Empire for National Tourism Week. The Inland Empire Tourism Council will be inviting Tour Operators, Travel Agents, Travel Writers, Local Legislators and other individuals that are involved in the industry locally. · In response to the Temecula ad placed in the 2000 San Diego North Official Visitors Guide 18 inquires were requested and forwarded to the Chamber for additional information. · Chamber staff referred Mike Walsh, Publisher of California Magazine/Food & Beverage [ntemational Magazine to the City and the Vintners Assoc. for a possible co-op project on Temecula. Activity Report · Tounsm calls 2,154 in April. · Total Phone calls 4,247 in April. · Walk-ins were up 21.13 percent in April. · E-Mail requests are up 89. · 13 percent from last year. · Web page user sessions: N/A Also attached are the Meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Local Business Promotions, Membership Committee and Government Action report and a May issue of Temecula Today! If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Thank you. ~ent/CEO Mayor Jefi~ry E. Stone Mayor Pro Tem JeffComerchero Councilman Ronald H. Roberrs Councilman Sam pratt Councilman Mike NagEar Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, A,ssishmt City Manager (}a~. Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors ~¥-11-00 THU 02:38 PM WORKFORCE DEV CENTER FAX:9096006005 FACE 2 Souttm, est Riverside Count_ May 11,2000 Jim O' Orady Assistant City Manager City of Teme~ula PO Box 9033 Temeoula, CA 92589 RE: Activity Summaqt - April 2000 Activities of the EDC during the month of April arc as follows: Business Develoomesat · Thc EDC did not receive any I~EP site sc~ch requests for April. · The EDC received two inquiries for the following: 1) Demographic info~nation for the City of Temecula was scnt to Grand Pacific International Realty Advisors m Ncwpoxt Beach, CA. Director Salina Ycc requested re}ocation/expansion~ community profile, and general information. Staff taxed Tcmecula oity pages from the draft Business Resource Guide and forwarded referral contact sheet to the City of Tcmecula. 2) Site search information was requested for a location in the City of Murrieta to house a chiropractic facility. Dr. Richard Ashden requested relocation and permit assistance. Staff met with Dr. Ashden to obtain further derails and forwarded a business contact sheet to Loft Moss, City of Murrieta. Marketing Outreach Staff attcndc~ the following meetings/events: · April 4, 2000 - Meetinl~ with the Buslneu Resource Guide Commifiee, Committee members met to review the draft resource guide · April 12, 2000 - SW Riverside County Manufacturers' Council Meetin~ Staffstrended the monthly meeting at the Tcmccula Work~orcc Development Center. Topics included "Importance of Manufacturing in the Temccula Valley" by Tcmccula Councilmember Mike NagOar and an update on the Council's website by Dr. Debi Spitzfader~ · April 17, 2000 - SW Riverside County Career Fair Meeting. - Staff is serving as a committee member for the SW Riverside County Career Fair_ The committee met to discuss event assignments. · April 19, 2000 - Third District Workshop held at the Hemet Workforce Development Center. Attendees included economic development partners, municipalities, and citizens of Riverside County's Third District discussed items in the Strategic Vision Plan 2000. ~Oaatlallg *~4lTF. m~CicleW,~!l. Tcmmi. CA~l~j0 ,fir, aeSll~/~l}l~ *FA.X~/~-E,I iufo~cdc-~nm.n~g MA¥-ll-00 THU 02:39 PM WORKFORCE DEV CENTER FAX:9096006005 PAGE Jim O' Grady City of Temecula Activity Sum mar)' - April 2000 Pab'c 2 of 2 · April 27, 2000 - EDC Qmarterly Luncheon at the Embassy Suites Hotel in Temecula Guest Speakers Russell Mnrphy and Partrick Murphy provided "Pechanga's Economic Forecast". · April 28, 2000 - Meeting: with Mike Freeman, San Diego Union Tribune. Mr. Freeman requested a meehng to gather information on the vapid growth m the Temecula Valley, and its relation to San Diego residents and commuting population · April 28, 2000 - Temecuh CONNECT Links Luncheon at Temecula City Hall. Guest Speaker C, ary Saner, president of Prosoff provided a workshop on "Software Developmerfi for the Internet Age". Mr. Saner discussed software development as it applies to projects, and effo~s to meet budget, schedule, and user expe~ations. Busines Relations · Staff artended the EDC Business Relations Commi~ee Meeting on April 6, 2000. attached meeting minutes.) (See _Administration/Organization · Executive Committee reconvened a special meeting on April 3, 2000 to determine the 2000- 2001 Operating Budget and workplan. · The Southwest Riverside County 1999 Business Census Report was presented to EDC rn~mben and g~neral public on April 17, 2000. The report is found on the EDC web site. · Board of Directors General Meeting was held on April 17, 2000 at the Workforce Development Center in Temeculs. General business was conducted, and other topics discussed were the 2000-2001 Openling Budget and EDC workplan. · EDC Proddent Gary Yore'hans and staff met with City of Temccula's Budget Sub-Committee to request funding for fiscal year 2000-2001, · Staff attcnded the Workforce Development Center Partner Meeting on April 27, 2000. Partners discussed facility maintenance and security issues, project coordination of special events, and activ/ties of conunon inta'est. This concludes the activity summary for April 2000. Should you have questions or nccd further detail, please call me at (909) 600-6064. Sincerely, Economic Devciop~ncnt Corporation of Southwest Rivcrsxde County MAY-11-00 THU 02:39 PM WORKFORCE DEV CENTER FAX:9096006005 PAGE 4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORA T/ON OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, April 6, 2000 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center Exeeutive Conferene~ Room ,Commita~ Meathers Present: Steve ~ Mur~t Chamber of Commerce Dave Dizon, US Bank Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks Community Bank David Waite, MSJC Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc. Michael Lew~ Law Offices ofMirau, Edwards, Cannon, Hinton & Lewin Lori Moss, City of Murrieta Kathleen Newton, Publishing Professionals Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Bonnie Renz-Hanna Randy William.% Barney & Barney David Waite, M~. San Jacmto College Also in Attendance: Patricia Nelson, US Bank K~vin Nellis, Coldwell-Banker Commercial Diane Sessions, EDC Linda Fief,, EDC .Call To Order Committee Co-Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m. yl/e!~cOme · Michael Lcwin thanked all for attending and welcomed D~rvid Waite of Mt San Jacinto College, and Patricia Nelson of US Bank, · Minutes were reviewed by the committee and approvcd Fo]low.-uo Action lieDorB · Head To Toe - Gary Youmarts not present to report · ProduefionEquipmentSpeciallies-Ga~Yomansnotprcsenttoreport- · Ranelm Metal Supply - Bunhie faxed a survey to them. Very busy. Com~nv Contact ReD0rB · Plant Equipment - Dick Kurtz reported that Plant Equipment was looking to expand in the near future. Plant Equipment manufacturers 9 11 emerge. hey switchboards_ · I~,i Raneho Animal Hospital - Bonnie Hanna reported speaking to them. Busy time for them. Survey fnxed · US Thermoplastics - Diane Sessions was pan of a group that visited, and r~ported that they are in the process of merging two companies, one from Azusa and one from Tc~'neculn, Ms_ Sessions followed up last week on status of survey and will Call back in a month. MAY-11-O0 THU 02:39 PM WORKFORCE DEV CENTER FAX:9096006005 PAGE 5 Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - April 6, 2000 Page 2 uf3 · Wakefield Engineering - Michael Lewin reporal he visit~ them with Julia Woods. They have been in Temecula for 28 years, have approximately 120 employees, and manufacture radio parts for automobiles. Big problem is attracting local employees because of a low pay scale. Most employees come from Pcms and Morcno Valley. They have another plant in Fullerton that is looking for a new location. May expand ~n Temeou]a after 3-year lease is up. Action Item List - Follow up on availability of new site. Also, Welfare to Work program has 5 trained candidarcs for machiP/st positions. · Windshield Pros - Bonnie reported they are a mobile windshield replacement business. In process of moving business to Murrieta on Cherry St. Could not gct v/sit at this time. Faxcd survey. Keith said he would call thorn and push to completc survey. · Rainbow Precision, Inc. - Bonnie reported they manufacture shields for motorcycles. Not very enthusiastic about visit. Fax~ survey. · Pu]ido Cleaning & Restoration - No time right now. Bonnie Hanna will follow-up. · Zoneworx - Bonmc has left three mcssagcs. No response at this t/me. · F&S Precision - M/chacl rcportcd they were reluctant to speak to him at first, but finally, hc was able to conduct an informal phone interview. They manufacture high-tcch robotio parts and have bean in the area for l0 years. They arc privately hold and havc approximately 20 employees. No growth at this time. Most of their business is in San Diego and Inland Empire. Action Item: David Waite to contact company owner regarding putting on second shift employees and training. Owner is looking to buy a building on Commerce Center Drive, but there are zoning restrictions. Act/on item: Follow up on possible now site for business. · Spectrum Tech - Action Item: Company has asked for a visit from EIX:. · Magnecomp - Randy Willjams to follow-up on visit. Goal ProVen Renort Randy Willjams stated that year-to-date visitations were slightly lower than goal projections, He announced year-to-date goal nsults as follows: 27 visits @ 3 points each ~- 33 phone intentiews (~ I points each ~- 60 visits/calls (~114 points YTD VISIT. PHONE ~Q_iNTS Actual 17 15 66 Goal 20 25 85 Variance -3 -10 Mr. Willjams asked to have binders returned on a regular basis and thanked Jim O'Omdy for City of Temecula's effort to resolve Channel Cox~oration fee issu~ Mr. O'Grady reported hc sent a letter to Channel regarding the results of the fec issues and was able to scotare partial f~c reimbursements of approximately $30,000. They seem happier. Mr. Willjams thanked all committee members for their efforts and visit% and provided Scc's candy bars for all. ~Y-11-00 THU 02:40 PM WORKFORCE DEV CENTER FAX:9096006005 PAGE 6 Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes -Apdl 6, 2000 Page 3 of 3 New Committee Aasiln~ments · Randy Will/ares, Alice Sullivan, Lori Moss. and Gary Youroans were assigned Alml v/si~s. Binders were provided to Mr. Willjams and Ms. Moss. Staff will deliver a binder to Ms. Sullivan. Mr. Youroans will keep his binder from Februmy. · Strategic Visits -- Downs Commercial Fueling, Inland Valley Hospital, Outdoor Channel, Aqua Ultraviolet, FFF Enterprises. EDC News and InfOrmation · Dianc reported on the new EDC Mission Statemcn~ Quaxterly Luncheon, 1999 Business Census Presentation, Career Fair, golf touraament and budget adoption for next year. Kathlccn Newton reported tMt she will be tnlclng the Resource Guide to print within the next few weeks, Merrieta - Lori Moss announced that the City's firemen received pay increases and are getting ready for their annual BBQ. Ms. Moss alas repoz~ed that the City will use grant funds to survey on home-based businesses in Murrieta and will n:port the results in Jane. Temeenla -Jim O'Cvrudy reported that the City has adopted a comprehensive growth management plan. Also, a traffic newsletter will be refermatted to a community newsletter, will include communities' growth and be reported on their web site. The City Council voted and rejected a no-braiding moratorium. A follow up workshop to be held April 26 at City Hall. A representative from Rancho Water will be available to answer water concerns. Also, a workshop w~ll be held regarding residential developer impact fees. The council is recommending a 10% increase par year. Diamond Venture, sponsored by the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (lk~p) will have ,q~ua~t~erly events beginning in June. David Waite announced an Open House scheduled for April 14 from ll:00 a.m. -2:00 p.m., at the Hen'let Workthree Development Center, 1025 N. State St, Hemet. The Center held a breakfast to honor companies who have donated manufaotttring eqmpment and materials to their training program. Also, Mr. San Jacinto College - ACCESS is planrang a soft skills workshop - "Professionalism in the Workplace" to be announced. Adjournment The mecting adjourned at 10:10 a~m. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT March 2000 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Secretary/Treasurer; Shed Davis, Stacy Sievek, Judy Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slayton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council · This month we received 82 phone calls; 9 - Film Festival, 7 - locations information requests, 47 - for Temecula "Showcase 2000" audition info, 19 - council business. · Production Guide Review committee has come up with a new and exciting format for the TVFC guide, which was presented to the Economic Development Sub-committee. We are continuing to call local businesses to add to and update information for reprint. · Photo files are being converted to digital files and being stored on CDs. · Work is continuing on the TVFC web site. · A Temecula booth has been reserved for ShowBiz Expo, which is to be held June 23 - 25 at the Los Angeles Convention Center. Due to a cancellation, we are now able to get a comer booth and will contact hotels and wineries to send representatives. · Sunny Thomas and Maggi Allen presented the 2000-2001 Temecula Valley Film Council budget to the Economic Development Sub- committee. · Jo Moulton and Peter Barnett made a Temecula Valley International Film Festival presentation to the Economic Development Sub- Committee. · Auditions were held for Talent Showcase 2000, which will be presented on June 3~d as part of the Arts Council' s "Arts in the Country Art Festival". More than 80 acts participated this year and 25 were chosen as finalists for the competition. Filming in Temecula · Agape Graphics requested locations with large open spaces and orange groves for backgrounds for commercial and possible web site use.Photos were provided. They will bring a crew in late May or early June. · New Covenant Fellowship requested permitting procedures for night filming and filming on Santiago bridge. City staff was contacted for this information. · The Film Council is researching postcard possibilities for current sites in Temecula. There have been many requests in Old Town but there are no current postcards available. We will forward our findings to the City. We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC Recap of TVFC Accomplishments 1999-2000 Japanese Soda commercial by h-School Productions filmed in Lake Elsinore and Temecula. Temecula location was primarily road/driving shots on Rancho California R~ad heading East past the wineries. Economic impact was oastJstaffJcrew of 47 who spent money in Temecula- they ate at our local restaurants and visited 3 wineries, purchasing wines and souvenirs to take home to Japan. Additional spending in Lake Elsinore and Murrieta for rentals, rooms and food. The Temecula Valley Film Council participated in the AFCI Locations '99 Trade Show at the Los Angeles Convention Center from February 19 -21 in the Inland Empire Film Commission Booth. Our poster size location photographs were displayed and we distributed our locations postcards Photographer, Michael Salas met with Sunny Thomas and Maggi Allen to scout some still photo locations. Mr. Salas was looking for horse and oattie ranches, vineyards and orange groves that we were able to provide and on a beautiful sunny day. Preliminary photos were taken and Mr. Salas will return in a few weeks to continue his work. In addition to his commercial photography, Mr. Salas works with a national locations photo library in New York, and he will be giving the TVFC copies of his photos to us in our Tomecola locations photo file. Kate Carmichael of American Eagle Out~Rers spent 4 days in Temecula using Embassy Suites as her base for scouting locations for their latest project. Ms. Carmichael used the TVFC production guide as one of her resources for locating her production needs locally. The Stampede was used as the location for a new TV pilot (yet to be named) which was shot in 4 days. The production staff indicated that they would like to return to Temecula for another project. We will keep in contact with them. Local movie producer, David lames filmed "The Big Blind". They filmed at the Casino in Lake Elsinore for 3 weeks and at the Old Town Bus Stop and in local strip malls in Temecula for 3 days. David also wrote the screenplay. Financially, they reported spending $120,000 in Elsinore and approximately $30,000 in both Mumeta and Temecula. Stacey Sivek, of Temecula, was the contact person and the production manager. They had a staffof about 100 - 60% were hired locally (electricians, carpenters and extras). They rented ap~,aents in Murrieta and got their supplies and equipment from local merchants in Temecula. Katie Carmichael returned and spent a week shooting still photographs in Temecula for American Eagle Outfitters. · Several local fanus with wooden bams were photographed for consideration in the upcoming Amway calendar. The Areway photographer spent the weekend at Temecula Creek Inn. Members of Fihn Council are participating festival activities by producing filmmaker "~Velcome" packets include the NEW Chamber of Commerce map of Temecula end tourism brochures end the Film Council's Production Guide of local businesses and services. A Poker Run Hot Rod rally has been arranged for the filmmakers on June 19m following the Great Race stop. Filmmakers will be driven through Temecula for fun end will be shown some of our excellent photo location spot at the same time. Maps will be distributed so that fithey see something they like, they will know how to find it again Still photos were taken in the De Luz are end will be used for automotive magazine advertising. 17 people stayed in local hotels for the shoot. Temecula Talent Showcase '99 was a great success. Close to 600 tickets were sold for what appeared to be a FULL HOUSE. As this was a fundraiser for the TVFC, we are pleased to have raised over $600, after awarding $2400 in prizes to the contestants The Temecula Valley was represented at ShowBiz Expo at the L. A. Convention Center on the weekend of June 26 - 27 in the IEFC booth with location photographs end our production post~ards. Local barns with wood siding were used as backup production settings for a film in process. This allowed the filmmaker to avoid the extra expense of returning to the films original location in Iowa. Sheri Davis of the IEFC was able to help us as this request came in the middle of the Festival. Cinema EnteRanent Alliance produced a very successful Film Festival. Attendance was increased over last year's Festival. Over 100 Temecula end area residents actively participated as volunteers to make the event run smoothly. Over 100 films were shown over a seven-day schedule in seven theaters ntthe Temeku Cinemas. Filmmakers end film production people from all over the world artended the Festival and represented their rims. · The Film Council distributed over 100 '~Velcome" packets to the filmmakers. Each packet included the NEW Chamber of Commerce map of Temecula end tourism brochures end the F~m Council's Production Guide of local businesses and services. · A Poker Ren Hot Rod rally was arranged for the filmmakers on June 19m following the Great Race stop. 40 filmmakers were driven through Temecula for a fun afternoon and were shown some of our excellent photo location spots at the same time. Maps were distributed so that fithey saw a location they liked, they would know how to find it again. The Australien team was awarded a basket full of Temecuh related items · On Sunday, June 20~ 15 filmmakers were taken for Hot Air Balloon experiences over the vineyards. Many of the filmmakers indicated that they would like to return to this area. · Eclipse Productions called looking for "migrant farmer" type houses. Their exact needs were outlined en their htemet website. Included in the website were photographs of possible locations they had found with an explanation of what was needed to make them the perfect film site. Area photos were taken (mostly on the eastside behind the vineyards) and Sunny Thomas met with their location scout to take her to the properties, NBC Olympics for television filmed irrterviews in Temecula. They called to get an idea of some interestmg locations to film in the city. Digital photographs were taken of the wineries (Callaway, Thornton & Mautice Came) and Old Town (the Church, the murals at the bus station & the archways). Location photos were sent by Email and then followed by hard copies. Locations were scouted for 10 days forthe shooting of"3000 Miles" to begin September 1, 1999. These filmmakers were participants in the 1999 Temecula International Film Festival and came to fred locations in Temecula as a direct result. With assistance from the Film Council, City Staff and Mayor Ford, the locations scout has been able to convince the filmmaker that everything he needed could be found or created in the Temecula area. There was to be a production crew of 25 people staying in Temecula for 28 days of filming This was an independent film with a budget of $500,000. Most local cities, merchants and residents have been very cooperative and accommodating. Production on "3000 Miles" has bean shelved due to fmancing. There was a distant hope that when they have new financing, they would come back to Temecula. There were 4 scenes including a casino, and 2 airports that were set for this area. The Inland Empire Film Commission fonvarded requests for property ownership information for the De Luz/Santa Rosa Plateau area to this office. With help from Rancon realtors and their files, we were able to provide the inform~ajon needed. TVFC received location requests for green grassy fields, old wooden bams, and working eattie or horse ranches. In all eases we were able to meet with the location scout and to provide the needed photo opportunities The locations manager for a new John Travolta movie came to Temecula looking for a street with eastern style houses with porches and non-California trees. The plan was to close the street for three days and snow in the whole area, Photos were taken, and he retumed to the studio. Follow up indicated that Temecula was not the right location. We were contacted by DensuTech, a marketing firm for Japanese automobiles, to supply several on road photo locations - roads by a river, by a lake, straight roads, winding roads, in mountains, by cliffs and over a bridge. New photos were taken and sent to DansuTech. Photo shoot willie in Spring 2000. ~ IEEP Film Commission referred a request for a two-story deserted or seemingly deserted farmhouse. Possible photo locations were faxed at their request. The City of Temecula forwarded a request for permitting and fee information to the TVFC. Stacy Sievek worked with the production people to meet their needs. · E! Entenainmeut called requesting shirts and hats from the Temecula Film Festival to be worn on a future show about film festivals. ]o Moulton was able to fill their needs. MTV requested help in finding 25 local young people (over 18) to help with a segment of their new show "Senseless Acts of Video" which teenacts exciting and exceptional portions of music videos. This segment was a helium balloon airlift. The filming took place locally, using the young people to fill the balloons and in a crowd scene as the balloons took off, stuntman in tow. Photographer, Christopher Stoneman, requested referrals for local makeup persons. He was given four referrals and was pleased to get our help. We are collecting video clips of movies filmed in the Temecula area forthe Inland Empire Tourism Cotmcil's upcoming marketing presentation. A copy of '~Voekend in the Country", filmed in Temecula and co-staring many Temecula residents including Mayor Jeff Stone, was purchased to use in the Inland Empire Toufism Council's upcoming marketing presentation and for TVFC files. Three other locally filmed videos are also being acquired for our files. TVFC was contacted by Eddie Hunt, who was looking for a warehouse to rent for interior filming. Stacy Sievek met with Mr. Hunt and was able to find a Temecula warehouse. Htmt's movie, "In My Blood", filmed in Temecula for 5 days in February -the budget is $1000 a day. TVFC received a request for permitting information on night filming on the Ove~and Bridge. As this is a new venue, we are working with the City's Planning Department to develop new guidelines. 2 one-day shoots for commercials were completed. Both shoots were conducted on private propexty. 2 days of commercials were shot in the Circuit City store at the Promenade mall by Propaganda Productions. Jeena Ryan a local video photographer will be contacting the City to produce a video on Temecula. She has just finished a video on Palm Springs for their Visitors Bureau. The TVFC has hired a pa~t time Production Coordinator to answer calls and coordInate location and filming requests. The update and reprint of the Production Guide will be completed by June 2000. The TVFC website will be completed by~nd oYJune with additiOnal location ~ites be added each month, INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC pARTNERSHIp Corporate · Public Speaking Engagements · Community Outroach · Membership Events · Public Policy Events · Committee Meetings · Member Visits/Calls · New Member ProspectJlnterest Letters · New Members For Period: January, 2000 to March, 2000 March I Cumulative l 5 21 17 5 2; FoundaUon · Grants · Activities 3, Marketing · Direct Mail · Print Advertising · Tradeshows Corporate Marketing 4 4 · Press Releases 3 · Professional Articles 4 · Media Relations · Other 2 · Prospect Missions · Site Selector Outreach · Leads/Sources of Leads 12 · Prospects/Tradeshows 22 · Site Tours 1 · Inquiries 585 · Attractions · Jobs Created · Retentions 2 · Jobs Retained · Financial Investment High Tech '~. :, · Clients/Inquiries · Client Hours · Training Events · Financial Impact · Other Projects Comments 10 45 3 1 7 28 45 5 Native Building Corp. Citrus Medical Group 2 6 6 Tech Coast Bus. Incubator Showcase 10 15 1 3 DSL Technology, Education Electronic Town Hall 1 23 3-CATCA; 4 Site Selector; 2 Member Broker; I Tradeshow 2 Other 22 4 1196 2 725 3 STC Plastics, Mfgr. in Coachella Valley 22 $ $39,800,000* *Partial Amount 4 5 REVISED 4/12~00 Page I of 2 .... For Period: ~ JanUarv,:2000;to~March, 2000,:,: ~ March I Cumulative I Comments 6. Education/Workforce Development, ! '~:: ;::' ',, : .~: ~ "::~!:'!~:~: ,*-;' · School Enrichment Standard 1 I 1 · Other 1 2 7, SBDC ! ,, ,,,::, , ,, ~ ' ! *,:! ,, ,:- ::~- .;~:~:~.:: .~.-: ',,,, :~,:! ..::::!:- . Jobs Created/Jobs Retained 19/30 53/33 · Total Economic Impact - $2,545,900 $6,129,761 SBDC and Export actions combined . Client Activity 284 811 ~ Client Hours 1,146 2,600.25 · Training Events 10 32 · Training Hours 222 1,634 ~ Training Attendees 93 428 · Inland Empire Trade: ,, Export Actions 2 5 · Financial Impact $130,000 $2,465,861 · Industry Outreach 7 · Request for Locations 655 · Permits: San Bernardino/Riverside 8/15 · Production Days 409 · Economic Impact** $7,262,020 · Filming Activity: · Features 7 · Television 7 · Commercials 31 · Stills 33 · Music Videos 0 · Student Films 3 · Documentary/Indus. Videos 7 · TOTAL FILMING ACTIVITY** 88 · Bureau of Land Management - 20 Permits for 7 days 12 1,060 25~26 861 $14,401,520 **Preliminary Numbers 11 13 70 60 5 6 16 181 ** Preliminary Numbers 20 I March { Cumulative ~ Comments :9..'Tourisni Cud ~cll,r~>~:~ · Industry Outreach · Marketing Activity · Tradeshows 1 4 Conference on Tourism · Promotional Materials · Mailings · Ads 1 · Leads · Tourism Events 1 3 Fishing Derby Prado Dam REVISED 4112100 Page 2 of 2 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BOARD OF DIRECTORS Thursday, April 13, 2000 Minutes of Meetinq A~endees: Staff: Scott Atherton, Augustus Cheatham, Dave Cornwall, Arnold Dickson, Barry Doffman, Jim Gourley, Linda Guillis, Brad Hudson, John Husing, AI Karnig, Roger Kranz, Bonnie O'Connor, Tom Potter, Jim O'Grady, Mark Ostoich, George Reyes, Bob Robie, AI Sabsevit:z, John Tavaglione, Phil Thomison, Alan Wapner, Baxter Willjams, and Jack V~att Jon Dirtmet, Alan Elgendy, Meredith Maloney, Jennifer Nutter, Teri Ooms, Margie Oswald, Paul Palsa, Mike Stull, Robert Usher, and Rhonda Whittaker The meeting was called to order by Chair, Bob Robie at 7:35 a.m. Robie welcomed the committee and self- introductions were made. A motion to approve and accept the minutes from February 10, 2000 was made and unanimously approved. I. Finance Report - Mark Ostoich Ostoich provided a one-page finance report. He said the profit and loss statement has no revenue shown because the revenue was booked in a prior report. The summary cash flow project, core IEEP began with $98,000 cash. He said membership renewal is cycleable and should increase between now and July, 2000. Ostoich said the IEEP accounts/receivable is very conservative, $154,000 ties into the balance sheet. A motion to approve the finance package was unanimously approved. il, Staff Report - Teri Ooms The March 2000 Monthly Activity Report was distributed and highlighted as follows: · The IEEP has five new members. · The IEEP is heavy into trade shows the first six months of this year. · There have been twenty-three site seamhes with two successes. · Our focus is on high-tech industries, specifically biotech companies. · On 4/26/2000, there will be a "Sustainable Smart Growth Plan lecture at University of Redlands. · Ooms thanked Scott Atherton for the use of a California Speedway box for the I EEP to entertain clients, brokers, etc. · EducationANorkfome Development issues - eleven schools from K through 12 have received funds. One problem is getting qualified electrical heavy manufacturer employees. There is a program in the fall for re-training of entry level people by a consultant hired by the local community colleges. California Steel will have training on site. San Bernardino county JESD is putting in money too. Husing asked where the funding comes from? Per Ooms, through the counties. Husing said, "This is a fabulous program and the IEEP is to be commended." Ooms said that the IEEP is the facilitator, pulling parties together and marketing the program to heavy manufacturers. · The SBDC has seen 811 clients in the first quarter of 2000 with $6.1 million impact. International Trade's funding ceased on 2/28/2000. · Film Commission numbers are in par with last years. They have had 1000 requests for locations and 181 film shoots. They are doing permits for both Riverside and San Bemardino counties and for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). · Tourism is still working on the Regional Visitor's Guide and expects 80,000 copies to be printed, which will be distributed via direct mail campaigns, state fairs, etc. Tom Potter said there has been interest from several cities, especially from the High Desert. He advised that we are conducting a "Fabulous Fairs & Festivals" conference/tradeshow at the Radisson on May 3, 2000, which will highlight all of the fairs, festivals and film festivals and will be open to the public in the afternoon. Third Annual Golf Tournament at Sierra Lakes on May 8, 2000. The presenting sponsor is Talbot Insurance and Financial services, Inc. Ooms introduced Dianna Skeens, Vice President, Membership Development. The IEEP has a marketing plan for member attraction/retention. Skeens reported that we have identified our target markets and should see a minimum net gain of $110,000. We are asking board members to provide three leads per year for Skeens to do follow-up on. She said the Board member can meet with Skeens and the prospective client or she will meet with the prospective client by herself. Skeens discussed a new portfolio packet put together by Meredith Maloney. Robie said all of the Board members will make themselves available to help increase solicitations of new IEEP members. Ooms thanked all the members for 95% retention rate, which is due to everyone in this room. Robie advised that there will be a monthly Marketing Committee meeting and that we're spending our time to demonstrate where the value is in being a member of the IEEP. Skeens said, '~Ve are improving our look." The question was asked who the five new members are? Per Skeens, they are as follows: 1. Brickley Environmental 2. California Capital 3. Citrus Medical Group 4. Diversified Pacific 5. Native Building Corp III. Action Items Dickson discussed SB 1582 by Senator O'Connell, which is a companion bill to AB 200, 1 Lockeed's Space Port bill by Assemblyman LongviIle. He said this is an excellent bill and will provide incentives to the State. There are four sites being considered in California, one of which is Harpors Dry Lake Bed. Sites in Florida and Texas are also being considered as well. Our members have written letters of support and the I EEP has a draft letter and roster of who it should go to. If anyone wants this information, call the IEEP. Dickson said this will bring high-tech, high paying jobs to our area if we are chosen. A motion was made to support and unanimously approved. Ooms announced that Dave Bernal resigned from Pacific Bell and is working for a company in Corona. Bernal has requested that his replacement, which has not been named yet, take his position on the Board. A motion was made to support and unanimously approved. Wyatt suggested that Skeens call Bernal at his new company to become a member. IV. Committee Reports Government Affairs - Arnold Dickson · Dickson discussed the trip to Sacramento that he, Robie, Ooms and Eric Haley made on April 4 & 5, 2000. They met with a number of legislators and provided them with information about the IEEP. · He said follow-up letters are being sent to all of the legislators, including the two they did not see, Rod Pacheco and Nell Soto, plus letters to the Governor and Secretary Hatamiya supporting AB 2001. o Dickson advised that the ne~ Government Affairs Committee meeting is Friday, April 28, 2000 at 7:30 a.m. at the Gas Co. Communit,/Partners - Teri Ooms · Ooms gave the report, since Linda Daniels is on vacation. · The marketing plan has been approved for the second year in a row. They have discussed raising the cost to net approximately $14,000 to cover losses. The IEEP has received many responses with seven new cities considering joining the IEEP. · The CD-ROM/Fact Book is ready and will be distributed to 6,000, plus will be distributed at tradeshows, etc. · Guillis reported that the Community Partners are meeting to discuss high-tech attraction. Economic Development - Jack Wyatt · Survey results are being looked at. He mentioned follow-up on the NAFTA Conference, which received a lot of support. Wyatt is working with our membership investigating, if we should or if we want to pursue, another insert in Forbes Magazine. Ooms said we have to commit to Forbes within thirty days if we are going to do another insert in 2001. This piece will be designed to create an awareness of the Inland Empire. Hudson said, "if any of you are looking for leads from that, you are missing the point." "The piece is designed to create awareness and enhance image." EducationNVorkforce Development - George Reyes · Reyes said that the training program at California Steel is important, plus they are joining the I EEP as a new member. · Working to enhance participation by Riverside County. SBDC ~ Mike Stull · Two airdates are being set up for a documentary with client testimonials, which will feature the SBDC. · The Diamond Venture forum is October 19, 2000 at the Mission Inn, plus there will be three mini forum luncheons, which will have a game show theme on the following dates: May 10, 2000 in Palm Springs, June 14, 2000 in Temecula, and July 13, 2000 in Ontario. Flyers will be sent to the Board. · Empowerment Zone expansion is in the final stages of determining staff and physical presence in office space. · Workin9 on a partnership with Cal State San Bernardino and Arrowhead Credit Union, to open a resource center on Hospitality Lane. · Workin9 to establish a more formal partnership with the City of Victorville V. Other Business Ooms reported that the Unisphere program from Washington, D.C. has a DOD contract. Congressman Lewis has worked with them to become our high-tech strategy. The program was scheduled to start October, 1999, but they had difficulty in finding someone. However they have found someone now and she will keep everyone apprised. Gourley said this program has tremendous potential, but is disappointed that it is going so slow. · Potter invited everyone to attend the "Fabulous Fairs & Festivals" conference on May 3, 2000 at the Radisson Hotel. Hudson discussed the dedication of a one-step manufacturing training center in Hemet, which is integrated with the Workforce Development Center with twelve partners. Services to be provided will also include seniors. · Hudson discussed a grand opening of a forty-acre recreation center on May 13, 2000, which will be a huge tourism attraction. NBC will be covering this event. · Kranz reported that the Economic Briefing conference will be shown on cable. · Kranz announced that the Buy.Com Tournament, October 9 through October 15, 2000, will have televised coverage. The meeting adjoumed at 8:44 a.m. The next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 8, 2000 at 7:30 a.m. at the University of Phoenix, Room 206, 301 E. Vanderbilt Way, San Bernardino, CA. 3 CilyofLakeEIsinore 130 S0uthMaln Streel Lake EIs~nore, CA 92530 4909)6743124 Fax(909[674-2392 CIt~ofMurdeta 26442 Beckmarl Ct Murrieta, CA 92562 [909) 304-2489 Fax {9091698 9885 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ECONOMIC ALLIANCE Marlene Best Assistant City Manager City of Lake Elsinore Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula Lori Moss Assistant City Manager City of Murrieta Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator May 3, 2000 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement, Marketinq Plan: Approved and final copy of the Southwest Riverside County Marketing Plan is included with this update. Identity Packaqe: Logo, letterhead and envelopes complete. Final proof of the tri-fold brochure to be presented to Alliance partners at regular monthly meeting on May 4, Due to the new direction of the inserts, the presentation folder and inserts are scheduled for discussion at the May 4*h meeting with Cutting Edge Marketing. Final proof of folder and inserts will be provided no later than May 18 to ensure a finished product by May 31. Web-site: The new web-site address for the Alliance is www.swrco.com. The design firm is currently working on the graphics and text for this site. This information will be provided at our next Alliance meeting on May 18, for approval, Advertising: Our ¼ page ad has been approved and submitted to Expansion Management magazine. May's issue will feature a focus story on the "Quality of Life as a site selection consideration". They will also be including a special article on Southern California. I had a brief phone interview with the writer of this piece and let him know about the Alliance. I also shared with him the business quotes we have received from businesses that have moved to Southwest Riverside County. This magazine is circulated nationwide and will be available for no charge at the Medical Design & Manufacturing trade show located in New York, June 6 - 8. They will also distribute this issue at the Plastics trade show located in Chicago, June 19. This issue will be released during the week of May 15th. Each Alliance partner will receive a copy of the May. Radio: We entered into contract with KOGO 600am radio in San Diego. This is a talk radio station, which features such personalities as Dr. Laura Schlessinger and Rush Limbaugh and is home to the Padres. The Alliance advertisements will air in prime locations, during peak drive time hours, including 14 Padres games. These ads will air seven (7) times per day, four (4) days per week, for a total of 126 spots. KOGO is the top rated station in the San Diego area and appeals to our targeted audience. Our advertisements will begin on May 8. Television: One behalf of the Alliance, I have retained Altek media to produce three (3) :30-second television commercials that will air in the San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties. I am currently researching the San Francisco/Silicon Valley market and will make recommendations on whether or not to advertise in these areas at our next Alliance meeting on May 18 My recommendation is to advertise on CNN, CNBC, MSNBC and the Discovery Channel. These channels are ideal to hit our targeted audience. These commercials will air by May 29. Airport Advertisinc!: I toured the San Diego Airport with the representative form Beazer Airport Advertising. I am currently reviewing our different site options that are available for advertising. I am negotiating on behalf of the Alliance to ensure our advertisement will be located in a high-traffic area, best seen by the traveling businessperson. This advertisement will be on a 43x60 back-lit sign. We will also have a brochure rack located underneath our advertisement. The re-stocking of these brochures is free. Our sign will be similar to the ad in Expansion Management magazine. 80O # I have checked into obtaining a toll-free number for the Alliance. EDA staff is working on which numbera are available. Our hopes are that we can use 600-6000 or 600-6001. With our goals of advertising nationwide, this would prove beneficial to inquiring business owners and decision- makers in regards to questions and obtaining information. This number will be used on all printed materials as well as television and radio. On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings: Manufacturer's Council Temecula Connect Business Relations Committee EDC If you need any additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (909) 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Hirdler Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robed Moran Prepared by Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator Apri119,2000 ECONOI~IC ALLIANCE Marketing Plan S.W.R.C. ECONOMIC ALLIANCE Marketing Plan Background The cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Temecula and the County of Riverside, together, founded the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance in 1999 and entered into the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement in October 1999. The goal of the Economic Alliance is to stimulate Economic Development within the Southwest region. This marketing plan, bearing in mind the above objective, is designed to attract businesses and more specifically target both Bio-medical manufacturing and general manufacturing businesses to the area. Some of the attributes of the Southwest Riverside area are; a business friendly atmosphere, a high standard of living, a high quality of life, a well educated work force, competitive housing pdces, access to the major ports of Southern California, convenient freeway access, and close proximity to San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties. With this in mind, the marketing campaign will create greater recognition of the area outside the county limits and generate leads that will ultimately result in business start-ups and/or relocation to the area. This marketing campaign will promote and maintain a strong public relations presence, as well as capture the targeted audience with a new look and creative design. Goals and Objectives Attract new business and investment to Southwest Riverside County as well as create new jobs in the region. Promote business development, economic opportunities, skilled and educated workforce as well as, quality of life of the region to business owners outside of the County's existing boundaries. Enhance the image of the Southwest Riverside County region and its abundant economic opportunities. Create a general awareness of the Southwest Riverside County region and it's many benefits. Business owners and decision in the Manufacturing and Bio-Medicel manufacturing fields. Executives of national and international corporations. Targeted Markets San Diego County Orange County Los Angeles County Northern California Implementation The original contract term was six (6) months. However, due to positive feed back. the contract is expected to be extended. For this reason, some of the following tasks are beyond odginal six- (6) month timeframe. Identitypackage Loqo/desi~n- Create a new logo and design that is specific for the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Expense: $ 650.00 Date: January 2000 Letterhead with envelopes - Add new logo to letterhead and envelopes to be used by all partners in the Alliance, business interest response, trade-show mailings and on a as-needed basis. (This pdce also includes 1,000 blank pages in selected paper stock). Quantity: 10,000 of each Expense: $2,935.71' Date: February 2000 Presentation folder with inserts - Design and create a presentation folder with five (5) inserts, one insert for each city, one insert for the County and a general quality of life insert non-specific to any one city, however, specific to the Southwest Riverside County region. Included will also be a map of the Southwest Riverside County region on back cover of the folder. Quantity - 2,500 Expense- $ 6,082* Date: April 2000 Advertising Brochure - Full-color tri-fold brochure with pe~orated panel for use at trade- shows, mailings and to provide interested businesses information on the SWRC Economic Alliance and the SWRC region. Quantity: 5,000 Expense: $2958* Date: April 2000 Business Cards - Specific for marketing coordinator Quantity: 1,000 (4 color) Expense: $100 Date: March 2000 * NOTE: Total includes concept, design, layout, photographs, copy writing, press checks and printing. Radio - KOGO 600 am San Diego 126 spots - pdme time/location Cost - $25,648.00 Date - May 2000 Currently researching other stations and airtimes News~aper/Mac~azines* · The Business Press Cost - $3,000 Date - August 1999 · Expansion Management Magazine One (1) ¼ page ad Cost - $3,493 Date - May 2000 Billboard- Cost- $25,000 Locations - San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties Date - June 2000 Commercial - Cost - $20,000 Locations - San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties Date - May 2000 Web-site - Cost - $5,000 Date - May 2000 Public Relations Trade shows · Medical Device & Manufacturing_trade show with Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP), in Anaheim. Cost - $I ,024.74 Dates- January 18-20, 2000 · Westec - trade show with IEEP in Los Angeles Cost - approx. $1,250.00 Dates - March 20-23, 2000 Speaking engagements (i.e. chamber meetings, service clubs) yet to be announced, Meetings and conferences representing SWRC (approximately 3 meetings per week) This is ongoing. Marketinq Campaign Timeline (revised) County Staff Representative The Riverside County Economic Development Agency will hire a full-time marketing representative to implement the Marketing Program in coordination with city staff. Monthly reports will be distributed to all participants of this agreement. Completion Date - January 2000 Marketing Materials Development of marketing materials, to include folder with inserts, brochure, letterhead with envelopes. Targeted Completion Date - May 2000 Trade Show Attendance Attend industry specific trade shows throughout the contract year. Specific trade shows wifi be determined during on-going meetings with city and county representatives. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Print Media Advertising Development of print media campaigns. One campaign will utilize an Inland Empire publication and others will utilize Business Journals or other publications outside the Inland Empire region. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Multi-Media Advertisinq Campaiqn Two advertising campaigns focusing outside the Riverside County region. The first campaign will occur in March 2000, and will focus on general industrial attraction for the region. The second campaign will occur in April 2000 and will be industry specific such as the biomedical industry or another industry as determined by the parties hereto. Campaigns will include, but not be limited to, billboards, radio, direct mail and print media. Targeted Completion Date - March and May 2000 Business Visitation A minimum of eight (8) company visitations will be performed by the county/city representatives. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Proposed Budget Identity Package Advertising · Commercial · Billboards · Radio · Magazines · Web-site Trade Shows Misc. $15,000 $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $20,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,000 $ 8,000 Grand Total $135,000.00 THE scc2at:_c" ,~k.,mm.. INDEPENDENT MAGAZINE FOR INSIDf THIS ISSHE Peple & Plac Michael Campbell has been named president of the Northwest which is i Publisher's Letter Association growth and prosperity in an age of unprecedented competition. 4 Making the Rounds APRIL 2000 VOL. 24, NO. 4 $4.00 ASSOCIATIONS News from the local societies of association executives in the West. 5 ': """' ii awest California's Route 66 Cities in and around the Californ' , New Technolodes _ Pioneering a Meetings Boom Fax and Internet technologies are by Barbara Beckley creating more options for sending last-minute meetings information. 13 State and regional association members who are inspired by change will find that the natural beauty and entrepreneurial spirit of the Pacific Northwest of- Meting Strate~qes fers a springboard to fresh perspectives and new ideas. Like the early pio- Adding value to the exhibit neers who carved out a new life on the rugged land and those later pioneers who portion of your next meeting. 14 helped engineer trends in the business world, associations will find a better way Resource Direct~20 when gathering in the Pacific Northwest. With a plentiful supply of meeting facili- Convention &visitors ties of all sizes and budget levels, planners will find it easy to lead the way. the focus of this month SEATTLE: AN EMERALD SETrING Feature: Merger Mania With companies such as Boeing, Mi- How to make sure a merger is ~ crosoft, Starbucks and Nordstrom based in right/or your association. 22 , ')" Seattle, it's obvious the city is able to spur Advanced Management success. The downtown is pedestrian-friend- ly, and free bus transportation throughout Results are achieved when the goals the city center makes getting around even of the organization are combined with your staffs personal goals. 24 easier. Cultural attractions include Be- naroya Hall, a 2,500-seat symphony hall. Western Calendar , ~ Pike Place Market and the landmark Space Upcoming industry gatherings (continued on page 26) for association professionals. 25 Soleduck Falls Is In the northwest corner of Washlngton's Olympic National Park (top), while visitors can commune with nature at the Northwest Alpaca Ranch In Washington County, Oregon (bottom). ~,,ALIFORNIA'S ROUTE 66 · CVB DIRECTORY ? Temecnla celebrates its twill passions of wine and ballooning with an annual festival. while the Coachella Valley offers solitude nmong the desert rock formations (inset). '~ 'ltl t I f'( "'mr "r/" *" by Mimi Freedman tretching from Chicago to Santa Monica, Route 66 captured Amer- ica's imagination when it opened in 1926. In California, the route S took travelers from the Mojave Desert through the Inland Empire before hitting the Pacific Coast. Today, visitors continue to be enthralled with the route's mystique. For association meeting planners, the area surrounding the route also offers facilities for high-quality gatherings. SAN BERNARDINO: HISTORIC HUB San Bernardino, 20 minutes north- east of the Ontario airport, became known in the 1920s as an entertaining stop along Route 66 and was later im- mortalized in the hit song as a town where you can "get your kicks on Route 66." The city pays tribute to the historic road every September with the Route 66 Rendezvous, the West Coast's largest automotive street fair. In the springtime, San Bernardino offers the Renaissance Pleasure Faire and the Na- tional Orange Show. The National Or- ange Show Events Center downtown houses the 24,000-square-foot Citrus Building, with space for up to 2,500 people. The center also offers a ball- room and conference center, the Orange Pavilion, the Citrus Museum, an arena and a sports centeL Hotels with meeting space include the Radisson Hotel & Convention Cen- ter, with 231 guest rooms and 19,000 square feet of meeting space for up to 1,500; the 248-roora San Bernardino Hilton, with meeting space for groups of up to 650; the Econo Lodge, with 136 guest rooms and meeting space for up 6 WESTERN ASSOCIATION NEWS/APRIL 2000 DESTINATION: CALIFORNIA'S ROUTE 66 boardroom. Also recently updated are the 163-room Courtyard by Marriott, which offers conference facilities for up to 100 people, and the Comfort Inn (formerly the Hampton Inn), with 116 guest rooms and a conference center. The 163-room Days Inn/Riverside of- fers meeting facilities for up to 150. ONTARIO: A MODEL CITY Closer to Los Angeles just off old Route 66 lies Ontario, a symbol of Cali- fornia's pioneer spirit. Founded as an experimental "model colony" in the 1880s, Ontario has become one of the state's fastest-growing cities. Its airport, convenient location and mild climate make it a top meeting destination. The Ontario Convention Center has fully integrated fiber-optic ports in its 70,000-square-foot exhibit hall every 30 feet and a new state-of-the-art telecon- ferencing center. The center also fea- tures a 20,000-square-foot ballroom and 20,000 square feet of flexible meeting space. Less than two minutes from On- tario International Airport, the center is within walking distance of more than 2,000 hotel guest rooms. An additional 700 rooms are within two miles. Hotels with meeting facilities near the convention center include the 308- room Hilton/Ontario Airport, with 14,000 square feet of meeting space; the 340-room Doubletree/Ontario, with 24,000 square feet of space for groups of up to 2,000; and the 299-room On- tario Airport Marriott, with meeting space for groups of up to 725. Addi- tional hotels near the convention center include the Best Western Ontario Air- port, the Doubletree Club, the Days Inn and the Residence Inn by Marriott. InnSuites, with 150 guest rooms, has three large meeting rooms and six boardroom suites. Country Side Suites Ontario and Country Suites by Ayers each offer meeting space for up to 300 people. Country Suites by Carlson, Res- idence Inn by Marriott, Good Nite Inn and the Holiday Inn Express/Ontario Airport all have meeting space. Nearby, the 184-room Radisson/Di- amond Bar-Ontario offers meeting space for up to 200 people, and the 174- room Holiday Inn/Monrovia has meet- ing space for up to 400 people. POMONA: COME TO THE FAIRGROUNDS Pomona, 15 minutes from the On- tario ajrport and about 35 minutes from downtown Los Angeles, is home to California State Polytechnic University Southeast of the Did Route 66 In the eastern San Bernardino mountains, BIg Bear Lake offers year-round recreation opportunities that provide Ideal pre- and post-meeting options, as well as the Los Angeles Cotmty Fair, the largest in the world, at the 487-acre Fairplex fairgrounds. Fairplex plays host to trade and consumer shows throughout the year. Flexible exhibit halls have 33,000 to 105,000 square feet of column-free space and can be used in various combinations; parking is available for 45,000 vehicles. At the en- trance, the 247-suite Sheraton Suites Fairplex offers 11,000 square feet of meeting space in seven meeting rooms. Kellogg West Convention Center & Hotel, on the Cal Poly/Pomona cam- pus, offers meeting facilities for up to 300 people. Meeting planners can also choose from two Shilo properties. The 129-room Shilo Inn/Pomona Hilltop Suites offers 11 meeting rooms and a convention center for up to 500 people. Just down the road, the Shilo Inn/Dia- mond Bar-Pomona offers 162 guest rooms and meeting space that can ac- commodate groups of up to 125 people. Claremont, an academic town in the San Gabriel Mountains just north of Pomona, is full of New England charm. Meeting space is available at the 270- room Claremont Inn Hotel & Confer- ence Center, which can hold up to 400 attendees. Additional hotels with meet- ing space include the Ramada Inn, with 124 guest rooms, the 62-room Howard Johnson and the Claremont Travelodge. TEMECULA: RURAL CHARM To the south, halfway between Los Angeles and San Diego, lies the scenic Temecula Valley, home to 14 wineries. Historic Old Town has rustic streets lined with antique shops and art gal- leries. Championship golf courses are nearby, and popular annual events in- clude the Balloon and W'me Festival. The vineyards and wineries offer a variety of tours and group activities. The Thornton W'mery features jazz con- certs, an outdoor patio area that seats 350 people and indoor meeting facilities for up to 80. The Callaway Vineyard & Winery offers rooms for tasting parties. Temecula hotels with meeting facili- ties include the 80-room Temecula Creek Inn, a sprawling resort that over- looks the valley and offers 27 holes of golf. The inn's 2,788-square-foot confer- ence center can accommodate up to 284 people. The 136-suite Embassy Suites/ Temecula has a lakeside view and of- fers more than 3,200 square feet of re- cently refurbished meeting space for groups of up to 225. Forty additional suites are being built, with completion expected in June. Meeting planners can also choose from the 133-room Pala Mesa Resort, with championship golf and tennis as well as 6,000 square feet of meeting space for groups of up to 200 people, and the Temecula Meeting Center, with space for up to 90 people. PALM SPRINGS: LIMITLESS LUXURY Amidst the desert scenery of the Coachella Valley, eight distinctly differ- ent cities offer a wide variety of options for meeting planners. A desert paradise sprinkled with '50s and '60s architec- ture, Palm Springs has a long history as a favorite resort for Hollywood's rich and famous. Although it maintains a 8 WESTERN ASSOCIATION NEWS/ApRiL 2000 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL .~"(':' '~"'~,~:~!':' ':1.~:l!~ The Who, Wha!~, WhetS, Where ~ipdt ~-of ~elOc~in ~o t'~ ~Di o Region 'H c right place The right place For your business and employees, Temecula offers a unique b{end of advantages: · Strategic bcation Along The I 15/~-215 Freeway Corridor · Highly Skilled Workforce · Fast Track Permit Processing · Employee Relocation Program · First-Time Homebuyer Program · No Utility Use Tax · Flat Rate Business License Fee -$35,00 · Persona{ Site Selection Assistance Temecula is home to a diverse group of companies from high tech manufacturing and medical dusters to telecommunications. With abundant communily parks and recreational facilities, picturesque Wine Country, historic Old Town, a new regional mall and popular annual events, there's a kaleidoscope af cultural and leisure actlvities for residents of all ages and visitors alike. An attractive housing market, safe neighborhoods, excellent schools and abundant business opportunities make Temecula the right place for your business. Call us at (909) 506-5100 - 888-TEMECULA or visit our website at: http:/ /w~,vw. ci.temecula.ca.us 43200 Business Park D~:, RO Box 9033 Temecda, CA 92589-9033 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police May 23, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during April of 2000. The Police Department responded to thirty-five "priority one" calls for service during the month of February, with an average response time of approximately 8.2 minutes. A total of 2,681 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of April, the Temecula Police Department's storefront served a total of 337 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month increased by over 20% to 101 prints taken, twenty- eight people filed police reports, twenty-three people had citations signed off, eleven recreation vehicle permits and six solicitors permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community odented programs during the month. Officer Fanene conducted one station tour for a Cub Scout group and three storefront presentations during the month. He conducted a site survey for the Temecula Sister City Association for the event "Taste of the World." Officer Fanene also completed an article for May edition of the Valley Business Journal called "When You Least Expect It....Protect Yourself." The POP Team of Officers Matt Hughes and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. The officers are working with two more apartment complexes to bring them up to certification. Other programs conducted this month included the continuation of the Homeless Assistance program in which four persons were contacted who came to the community. As a result, one of them was arrested for sleeping at McDonald's and a trespassing letter was received from an Old Town property owner requesting our cooperation in regards to homeless people sleeping on the property. A pro-active vehicle sweep was conducted with ten citations issued. Old Town patrol resulted in the arrest of two subjects for vadous offenses and two citations were issued. No problems were noted with the "Western Days" special event held this month. On April 7, the POP and traffic teams conducted the monthly Operation ERACIT DUI program. This month a stationary checkpoint was used. This operation resulted in the arrest of three persons for Monthly Departmental Report - April 2000 Page 2 DUI. During this month the extra duty Neighborhood Enforcement Program was initiated in the area of Via Cordoba due to traffic concerns. As a result of this program, fifty-one citations were issued. For the month of April the following statistics from the traffic team showed; 281 citations were issued for hazardous violations, 137 citations were issued for non hazardous violations, 160 parking citations were issued, one fatal collision (involving 2 actual deaths), eleven injury collisions, fifty four non-injury collisions were reported and thirty-three drivers were arrested for DUI. During the month of April, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of forty- five calls for service. These calls resulted in the criminal filings on five misdemeanors and one felony case for various offenses. Four citations were also issued. The Temecula Against Graffiti program (TAG) under the direction of Officer Anderson conducted two programs this month. As a direct result of this program five misdemeanor arrests, eight citations, one stored vehicle, eighteen vehicle stops and sixteen pedestrian checks were made. The four school resource officers continue to remain very active in their schools. During the past month, the officers made presentations to pupils on narcotic laws. Eight arrests were made at the high schools for misdemeanor offenses, and five arrests were made at the elementary schools. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. This program has a total of ninety-eight active cases at this time. A probation officer was assigned to the program during the middle of the month to fill the vacancy created several months ago. Additional programs this month included school presentations on the JOLT program, truancy reduction, drug, alcohol, tobacco awareness training and a mentodng program that involves past JOLT participants. A forty hour School Resource Officer training program was attended this month. Additionally a meeting was held for eighteen new juveniles and their parents due to pending cases. Dudng the month of April, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and Mark Krikava handled a total of twenty-three cases. These cases resulted in nineteen misdemeanor and seventeen felony arrests, pdmadly for narcotics violations. The SET team also worked in conjunction with a request to establish a narcotics educational program for business employees at a local company. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of assistant volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerdsh, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 724 hours of service in April. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, Iogistics support, crime observation (TAG program surveillance), special event assistance and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of two hundred and forty nine hours dudng the month. A large part of this time was spent assisting with the off road vehicle enforcement program. This program focussed on areas around the city that experience problems with off road motorcycles. Under the direction of Officer McEIvain, the results of the program for this month were four citations issued and ten warnings given. The posse contributed thirty hours during the month for the off road vehicle enforcement program.