The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About060100 CC CIP Workshop AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL CIP WORKSHOP AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 1, 2000- 6:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Councilman Naggar ROLLCALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. R:~Agenda\0601 O0 1 COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 Review of the Proposed FY 2001-05 Capital Improvement ProQram RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Review and discuss the proposed FY 2001-05 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and provide direction to staff as appropriate. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 13, 2000, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\060100 2 · :.:.. .... ....... .. ;. · . . .. :. . CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberrs, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 25, 2000. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 13, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. RAAgenda\060100 3 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberrs presiding ROLLCALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 25, 2000. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 13, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:%Agenda\060100 4 ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ,/~ DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance,~ June 1, 2000 Review of the Proposed FY 2001-05 Capital Improvement Program PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and discuss the proposed FY 2001- 05 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and provide direction to staff as appropriate. DISCUSSION: The CIP is the City's plan for providing public improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are nonrecurring. The proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling of all capital improvement projects over the next five years. CIP DEVELOPMENT The bound document is presented for City Council review and comments, and is separated as follows: - General Information Regarding the Capital Improvement Program - Revenue and Cost Summaries - Circulation Projects - Infrastructure/Other Projects o Park Projects - Redevelopment Development Agency (RDA) Projects The proposed CIP is a culmination of five staff CIP workshops, which addressed each project for feasibility, necessity, funding sources, and timing, All departments that were involved in the process and contributed significantly to the discussions, resulting in a realistic and comprehensive proposed five year Capital Improvement Program, COSTS Overall, the total cost as identified in the CIP is ~345,691,460. A total of 118 projects are included in the program, consisting of fifty-five (55) Circulation Projects, eighteen (18) Infrastructure/Other Projects, thirty-three (33) Park Projects, and twelve (12) Redevelopment Agency/Housing Projects. The following illustrates the associated costs for each project classification and total cost: Project Circulation Infrastructure/Other Projects Parks Redevelopment RDA/Housing Cost ~234,945,600 68,466,600 29,392,200 12,887,060 REVENUE Projected revenue from identified sources for the Five Year Capital Improvement Program is $117,995,670. Unspecified (unfunded) project costs for the five year program total 9232,245,900. Through the first two years of the five year program, there is adequate funding for all proposed projects. The CIP is fully funded in FY 2000-01 at 936,408,360 and in FY 2001-02 at $20,937,000. However, for the remaining three years, in the unspecified category, the deficiency begins and continues to increase to the five year total of 9232,245,900. Included in this five year plan are twenty-six (26) projects which currently do not fit into the five year window, but warrant consideration and review in this document. These projects are proposed to be funded by both assessment districts and unspecified funds in future years for a total cost of 9170,012,300, which is included in the total unspecified amount of $232,245,900. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2001-05 Five Year Capital Improvement Program establishes the project appropriations for FY 2000-01. Attachment: Proposed City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program document TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APRIL 25, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:47 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, and President Comerchero. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Acceptance of Landscape Bonds and Aareement for a raised median within Maraarita Road - Sycamore Creek Tract No. 28810 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the agreement and accept surety bonds from Ryland Homes, Inc. to improve the median landscaping within Margarita Road. 2 Acceptance of Irrevocable Offers of Dedication from Richmond American Homes of California, Inc. for access and maintenance of irriQation equipment - Tract Nos. 23143-2 and 23143-3 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the Irrevocable Offers of Dedication for accessing and maintaining certain irrigation equipment associated with future TCSD slope areas within Tract No. 23143-2 and Tract No. 23143-3. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2. The motion was seconded by Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DISTRICT BUSINESS 3 Racing at the Northwest Sports Complex RECOMMENDATION: 3, 1 Accept the findings of the sound study report regarding racing at the Northwest Sports Complex; 3.2 Approve the motorcycle and race car schedule proposed by the Temecula Town Association ('R'A) for use of the Northwest Sports Complex. R:\Minutes\042500 1 Director of Community Services Parker provided an overview of the staff report (or record), relaying that the Temecula Town Association (TTA) proposed to conduct approximately 20 racing events from April 29, 2000 to the end of October; noted that on March 18, 2000 a racing event was held at the Northwest Sports Complex at which time a sound study was conducted to determine the level of noise generated at the site, specified the areas where the study was conducted; and noted that the results of the study determined that the noise levels were moderate. Director Pratt commented on the high levels of noise in the area at the time of the racing events; and relayed that in his opinion the sound study had been prejudiced. The following individuals relayed their opposition to the racing event proposal: Mr. Clif Hewlett n Mr. Paul Nolan a Mr. Tony Pontarelli [] Ms. Greta Pontarelli [] Mr. Tony Pontarelli Jr., [] Mr. Eion McDowell 42890 Calle Corto 3880 Lemon Street Riverside 25290 Lisa Marie Circle 25290 Lisa Marie Circle 25290 Lisa Marie Circle 42600 Pradera Way Attorney representing Mr. Eion McDowell The above-mentioned individuals relayed the following comments: v Questioned the objectivity of the sound studies, and challenged the results which compared the noise levels from the cars to that of a conversation. Relayed that on the one day that the study was conducted all the vehicles utilized for racing at the track were not evaluated. Noted that if the test would have been conducted in alternate areas, the results would have greatly varied, requesting that additional testing be conducted at the applicant's cost. With respect to the race schedule, noted the impact of the noise being continuous for nine hours every Saturday during the summer season. Advised that litigation would be pursued, if necessary. Specified the discrepancies in the Negative Declaration with respect to, the following: 1) consideration of two vehicles in lieu of the seven vehicles which utilized the track, and 2) consideration for racing until 9:00 P.M. when races have been scheduled through 10:00 P.M. ,,' Requested the Directors to deny this proposal. Relayed that the noise was so loud, the Police Department had been called originally due to the nuisance of the noise. Noted that the noise negatively affected the quality of life, relaying that the sounds were similar to a lawn mower. v Advised that the noise levels would most likely have a negative affect on the wildlife at the proximate reserve area. Relayed that the noise levels were restricting weekend entertaining, and sleeping. Offered to compensate the City financially for the monies that would be collected from the racing events. R:\Minutes\042500 2 ., Provided a video, demonstrating the noise levels at a neighboring home. For Mr. Hewlett, President Comerchere offered clarification with respect to the noise level comparison to conversational levels. For Director Roberts, City Attorney Thorson clarified the liability issues associated with the proposed activity, noting that the TTA would reimburse the City for any legal costs incurred. In response to Director Naggar's queries, Ms. Pontarelli clarified that the issue of concern was primarily a noise issue, and not a time scheduling issue. Mr. Sharo T. Sanavi, acoustical engineer conducting the study, responded to the community comments; relayed that the noise level comparison to conversation solely related to a decibel level and not to the quality of the noise; concurred that additional tests should be conducted; noted that mufflers could be placed on the cars to reduce sounds; provided additional information regarding alternate sound controls (i,e,, barriers); in response to President Comerchero's queries, advised that the study conducted was not extensive; for Director Roberts, confirmed that the study did not encompass Mr. Dowell's area of residence, clarifying that the study was conducted at the locations the City had directed; advised that line-of-sight had an impact on the levels of noise heard due to the lack of barriers; and for Director Stone, confirmed that average conversation noise levels were between 45-50 decibels; and specified that with mufflers there could be a fifty percent (50%) reduction in noise levels, With respect to the noticing of this hearing, City Attorney Thorson clarified that notice was sent to residents within 1200 feet of the site which was 900 feet more than the Code requires, relaying that notices were additionally sent to the residents on Mr. McDowelrs street due to receiving two complaints of noise from that location; and for President Comerchero, noted that residents were notified by distance whether or not the area was within the City limits. The Directors rela,/ed concludina remarks, as follows: In light of the video presentation, Director Stone relayed that it appeared that the residents were impacted by high levels of noise; advised that he could not support the proposal, as written; recommended meeting with the residents to discuss a compromise, to investigate the impacts that mufflers would have on the noise levels, and to further review the schedule; and recommended that the matter be continued until an agreement was reached with both parties (the ']'rA and the public). Relaying his interest in car racing, Director Roberts relayed that he could not support this proposal at this present time, recommending that there be additional testing (i.e., in the vicinity of the McDowell's house). Director Naggar relayed concurrence with Directors Stone and Roberts comments, noting that he greatly valued being able to spend time at home in the backyard, commenting on the negative impacts these residents were experiencing. Director Pratt noted his opposition to this proposal. MOTION: Director Stone moved to continue this agenda item for 30 days in order to allow for additional study. Director Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. In response to Executive Director Nelson's queries, Directors Comerchero and Stone offered to meet with the residents with regard to this issue. R:\Minutes\042500 3 4 Children's Museum Feasibility Study - Interim Report RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file this interim report regarding the Children's Museum Feasibility Study. Director Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. Director of Community Services Parker presented the staff report (via agenda material), relaying that the museum feasibility study would not only address the need for the facility, but also the facility's size, scope, and operations of the facility; and introduced Mr. Arthur Greenburg who would provide the Board with an update. Via overheads, Mr. Greenburg provided an overview of the Temecula Children's Museum Feasibility Study, highlighting the results of the key informant interviews; presented model comparison facilities; relayed that per the intercept surveys, there was very strong support for the project, noting that 72% of those surveyed had visited a children's museum at some point in the past; advised that a site in Old Town was the preferred location; and relayed the children's vast interest in the sciences. In response to Director Naggar's' queries, Mr. Greenburg relayed that the survey gathered data regarding the interest in attendance; for Director Pratt, provided additional information regarding development of a site in Old Town, independent of the history museum; for President Comerchero, confirmed that it would be a good concept to develop the project at a site with room for expansion; and relayed that initially the recommendation would be to focus investment in the obtaining of the exhibits rather than the development of a building, and to initially utilize an existing building. President Comerchero commented on the survey results revealing the priority the City placed on education. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to receive and file the report, President Comerchero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Stone who abstained. 5 Environmental Review of the Rancho California Sports Park Field Liqhtinq Preiect RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Make a finding that the Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting Project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA guidelines and authorize staff to proceed with the project. Director Naggar advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this item. Director of Community Services Parker provided an overview of the lighting project, noting that the McMillan Company was contributing $150,000 towards the installation of lighting on these three particular ballfields at Rancho California Sports Park on the north side of Rancho Vista Road; advised that the project was posted, and the proximate residents had been noticed; and provided additional information regarding the Musco Lighting System which specifically directs the light to the fields, For Director Stone, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that approximately 8-10 lighting poles would be installed, providing additional information regarding the type of lighting being R:\Minutes\042500 4 installed, inclusive of the effective glare shields; and for Director Pratt, specified that these lighted fields could also be utilized for soccer activities. MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve staffs recommendation. Director Roberrs seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Naggar who abstained. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Director of Community Services Parker thanked the community for their participation in the successful Egg Hunt festivities, which were held on April 22"d at four park sites, noting that there had been approximately 3200 participants. With respect to the Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park parking issues, Director of Community Services Parker thanked Mr. Camille Bahri for granting the City permission to grade one- and-a-half acres of his property for additional parking on a temporary basis, relaying that staff would be doing the grading work this week. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT General Manager Nelson commended the Community Services staff for their expeditious work with respect to the grading parking project at Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park, h additionally noting that on April 29t there would also be a security guard present to aid with the Saturday morning parking. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:51 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to next adjourned regular meeting: April 27, 2000, scheduled to follow the City Council Workshop, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President A'I'I'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\042500 5 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APRIL 25, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:50 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, and Chairman Roberrs. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None. Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR Environmental Indemnification and Remediation Aqreement for sale of property to Richardson Real Estate, LLC RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Environmental Indemnity and Remediation Agreement; 1.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2000-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNIFICATION AND REMEDIATION AGREEMENT BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO INDUCE CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST AND THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION TO PROVIDE A LOAN TO RICHARDSON REAL ESTATE, LLC FOR PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. t--1988 MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comments. R:\Minutes\042500 1 AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:51 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to next adjourned regular meeting: April 27, 2000, scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberrs, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\042500 2