Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-039 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 2000-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ANTENNA ORDINANCE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0242) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA97-0242 in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on May 17, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to the Application on May 23, 2000, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the Application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The City Council, in approving the Negative Declaration hereby makes the following findings A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City staff prepared an Initial Environmental Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Ordinance. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Ordinance could have a significant effect on the environment. Thereafter, staff circulated a public notice requested public comment on its intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the Antenna Ordinance. No public comments were received. B. The City Council has reviewed the Initial Environmental Study and all comments, written and oral, received regarding the proposed Negative Declaration, and based upon the whole record before it, finds the following: 1. That the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; 2. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and, R:Resos 2000-39 I s 3~0' auoC euoN euoN euolS 's~eqo8 '~eJcl '~eB6eN 'o~eqo~ewoO :S~Ig81AI=IIAIqlONNO3 :S~Ig~]IAIi~IAI'IIONNO3 :S~IqSI/~qlAI'IIONNOO 0 :lN398V 0 :930N :93AV :a$OA ( V1FIO3~I=II JO/d, IO ss ( =IOIS~=IAI~ JO AINNOO ( VIN~IO-II'IVO JO =IIVIS ['lV=lg] :19:lJ,1V '000~ '/~elAI Jo/~ep pJg~ eql uo pleq 6u!leew JelnSeJ e ie elnoeuJe/Jo/~1!3 eq$ ,~o i!ounoO A1!3 ~ql Xq 'as doa aNY a3AOt:ldaV 'aSSg~d · uo!lnlosald s!41 jo uo!ldope e41Lj!~jaa Ileqs ~lJelO ,~1!0 eqi 'g uo!loeS