The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About092600 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make masonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title Ill AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:15 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City and/or the Agency. The following case/claim will be discussed: 1) Temecula Openspace Preservation Organization v. City of Temecula Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2000-11 Resolution: No. 2000-68 Mayor Jeff Stone Cindy Broz, Flutist and Albert Ball, Pianist Reverend Jerry Hangen from Grace Presbyterian Church Councilman Naggar Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Certificates of Appreciation for Henrv Miller Certificate of Achievement for Arrow of Liqht Recipients Proclamation for Susan G. Komen Race Dav R:~Agenda\092600 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A totat of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. if you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resoIutions included in the agenda. 2 Resolution Al~l~rovincl List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:~Agenda\092600 2 3 5 6 7 R:~Agenda\092600 Consideration of The Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Race for the Cure Sponsorship request RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the event sponsorship agreement with The Inland Empire Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Tract Map No. 29036 - Findinq of Conformance with its oriqinal approval (located on the south side of Via La Vida between Marqarita Road and Solana Way) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve Tract Map No. 29036 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 4.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 4.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. Parcel Map No. 29407 - Findinq of Conformance with its oriqinal approval (located on Commerce Center Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29407 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 5.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreements. Conveyance of Riqht-of-Way Easement to the City of Temecula RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Accept the conveyance of right-of-way easement on Sixth Street for public street and roadway purposes including public utility and service facilities; 6.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the document. Second Readina of Ordinance No. 2000-10 (Juvenile Loiterinq) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.16 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO JUVENILE LOITERING AND PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR JUVENILES 3 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:%Agenda\092600 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2000-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2000-15 Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no. jr on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of August 8, 2000 2 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Rancho California Spods Park Field Liqhtinq - Project No. PW00-19CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the project plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the construction of Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting - Project No. PW00-19CSD. 3 Authorization to release a formal bid for the Desiltation Pond Project RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Desiltation Pond Project. R:~Agenda\092600 5 4 Tract No. 29036 - Service Level B and Service Level D Rates and Charqes (located on the southeast side of Via La Vida) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 29036 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 5 Water Park FeasibilitV StudV Professional Services Contract RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award a professional services contract of $28,000 to the Natelson Company, inc. for the preparation of a feasibility study for a Water Park; 5.2 Approve a 10% contingency of $2,800 for the project. DISTRICT BUSINESS 6 Temecula Public Library Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Temecula Public Library Master Plan. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 10, 2000, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Ternecula, California. R:~Agenda\092600 6 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2000-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2000-07 Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no__t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of August 8, 2000 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 10, 2000, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\092600 7 RECONVENETEMECULACITYCOUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 8 Planninq Application No. PA99-0261 - Zoninq Amendment, Map Chancle and Planninc Application No. PA99-0371 - General Plan Amendment RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a mitigated negative declaration for Planning Application No. PA99-0261 8.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0261) 8.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP TO REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0371) 9 Amend the siqn standards in Chapters III and IV of the Old Town Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the categorized exemption under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; 9.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: R:~Agenda\092600 8 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER Ill SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) COUNCIL BUSINESS 10 11 Discussion of Amendin¢l the Growth Manaqement Proplram (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilman Pratt) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Consider the recommendations of Councilman Pratt to amend Section 2(B)1 of the Growth Management Program concerning establishing project densities. Desiqnation of Votinq Deleqate and Alternate Votinq Deleqate for the Annual Conqress of Cities, December 5-9, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Designate a voting representative and an alternate. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, October 10. 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\092600 9 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set fodh in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,264,754.77 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC CityClerk [SEAL] Resos 2000- J STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do cedify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of September, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC CityClerk Resos 2000- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 09/07/c0 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/14/C0 TOTAL CHECK RUN; 09/26/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/14/00 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09/26~00 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COIVedUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL S 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ, FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CiP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILI'RES 100 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY~CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: $ $ $ 298,669.14 8,970.42 28,281.34 8,721.99 305.99 302,404.28 279,103.81 368.55 1,714.04 8,923.94 $ $ 150,585.19 2,592.28 42,006.77 55.23 2.347.33 491.11 1,543.36 769.62 5,367.47 2,052.18 3,621.13 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 627,784.65 258.5~3.84 211,431.67 1,264,754.77 1,264,754.77 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 09/07/00 11:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/NOD SET ASIDE 190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 31o773.77 4,146.00 32,585.13 1,264.02 275,856.62 272#846.20 7,041.50 2,271.41 TOTAL 627,784.65 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 09/07/00 11:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 64378 09/06/00 CORDER, TANYA 64379 09/07/00 000596 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 64380 09/07/00 BEST WESTERN STOVALL#S ITEM DESCRIPTION REISSUE:REIMB:CCAC CF:CONCORD CALIF LEAGUE CF:9/7'9:HM"JP"MC HTL:CA LEAGUE:9/7-9:HM-JP-MC 64383 09/07/00 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIA TINY TOTS SUPPLIES 64384 09/07/00 004148 A T & T 64385 09/07/00 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC 64386 09/07/00 003988 AGUILAR CONSULTING ENGI 64387 09/07/00 002733 ALBAO, NANCY 64388 09/07/00 64389 09/07/00 000101 64389 09/07/00 000101 64389 09/07/00 000101 64389 09/07/00 000101 64389 09/07/00 000101 64389 09/07/00 000101 AMERICAN ASSOC FOR STAT APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE# INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC, APPLE ONE, INC. 64390 09/07/00 001445 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TE 64391 09/07/00 AUTEN, JAN 64392 09/07/00 004072 BUTLER, MICHAEL G. 64393 09/07/00 001139 CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY LONG DISTANCE SVC: POLICE DEPT CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT ALIGNMENT STUDY:NUR CRK/R.WAY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MEMBERSHIP:OTT,WENDELL 0141697 TEMP HELP W/E 08/19 BRUNER TEMP HELP W/E 08/19 BRUNER TEMP HELP W/E 08/19 ROSA TEMP HELP W/E 08/19 WESTHAVER TENP HELP W/E 08/19 MAT/BUR/HI TEMP HELP W/E 08/19 CARLSON WESTERN FAMILY RQOND-UP:09/30 REFUND: CPR TRAINING FACADE IMPRV PRGM:CLOCK TOWER BAL:BALLOON/WINE AREA PHOTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-120-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-183-999-5320 001-170-999-5208 001-170-999-5208 210-165-707-5802 190-183-999-5330 190-185-999-5226 001-163-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-100-999-5260 190-183-4982 280-199-813-5804 001-111-999-5270 64394 09/07/00 002329 COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CE DOCUMENT CONVERSION & INDEXING 320-199-999-5250 64394 09/07/00 002329 COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CE ON-SITE SERVICE 320-1~-999-5250 64395 09/07/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64395 09/07/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64396 09/07/00 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 64396 09/07/00 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 64397 09/07/00 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 64398 09/07/00 64399 09/07/00 001014 64400 09/07/00 004250 64401 09/07/00 001393 CITY HALL:REPAIR CONTRL BOX 340-199-701-5250 TECHNICAL SUPPORT-DOOR SECURTY 320-199-999-5215 CENTER CONSOLE FOR MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5604 MOBILE RADIO FOR PW BOOM TRUCK 001-164-601-5610 GEOTECHNICAL SVGS:PAVEMENT MGT 210-165-655-5804 0037~9 COTTON BELAND ASSOCIATE CONSULTANT UPDATE HOUSING ELEM 001-161-999-5248 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS REFURBISHMENT OF CITY FLOAT CUSTOM GATE PARTS TO REPAIR GATE I STN 84 DATA TICKET INC JULY CITATIONS PROCESSING 190-180-999-5250 001-171-999-5212 001-170-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 67.44 425.00 690.00 93.72 20.71 222.80 5,272.00 880.00 75.00 151.92 151.92 214.08 468.00 742.95 97.50 40.00 28.00 3,300.00 1,041.95 3,000.00 1,500.00 136.00 1,088.00 323.25 1,409.83 2,898.00 1,256.75 898.37 204.00 371.50 CHECK AMOUNT 67.44 425.00 690.00 93.72 20.71 222.00 5,272.00 880.00 75.00 1,826.37 40.00 28.00 3,300.00 1,041.95 4,500.00 1,224.00 1,733.08 2,898.00 1,256.75 898.37 204.00 371.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 09/07/00 11:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 64402 09/07/00 64402 09/07/00 64402 09/07/00 64403 09/07/00 64403 09/07/00 64403 09/07/00 64403 09/07/00 VENDOR NAME 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN# ARCHI 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI 001945 E A MENDOZA CONTRACTING 001945 E A MENDOZA CONTRACTING 001945 E A MENDO7j~ CONTRACTING 001945 E A MENDOZA CONTRACTING 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 64404 09/07/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 64405 09/07/00 EDISEN, MICHELE 64406 09/07/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 64406 09/07/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 64406 09/07/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 64406 09/07/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 64406 09/07/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 64407 09/07/00 000478 FAST SIGNS 64407 09/07/00 000478 FAST SIGNS 64408 09/07/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 6/.408 09/07/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 6/,408 09/07/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 64408 09/07/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 64409 09/07/00 001093 FRAZEE PAINT 64410 09/07/00 004146 GILLILAND, ROBIN 64411 09/07/00 003640 GRAYNER ENGINEERING 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 64412 09/07/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MAINT FAC PHASE 3 DESIGN SVCS DESIGN SVC-SENIOR CTR EXPAN CREDIT:INV EXCEEDS CONTRACT 210-190-158-5802 210-190-163-5802 210-190-158-5802 JUL PRGS: S.PRKING LOT:PWO0-05 CREDIT:ITEM 3 EXCEEDS CONTRACT REVERSE RET:CREDIT:PWO0-05CSD RETENTION:R.C.PRKLOT:PWO-05CSD 210-190-175-5804 210-190-175-5804 210-2035 210-2035 TEMP HELP W/E 08/25 SALAZAR TEMP HELP W/E 08/25 WILLIAMS TEMP HELP W/E 08/25 THORNSLEY TENP HELP W/E 08/25 HILLBERG TENP HELP W/E 08/25 SHAH TEMP HELP W/E 07/28 THURSTON TEMP HELP W/E 08/11THURSTON TEMP HELP W/E 08/25 THURSTON 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 165-199-999-5118 001-163-999-5118 190-186-999-5118 190-186-999-5118 190-186-999-5118 REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND BEG. 190-183-4982 AUG LDSCP REPAIR:R.C./MEADOWS AUG LDSCP REPAIRS: YNEZ/SANTIA AUG LDSCP REPAIRS: PALA PARK AUG LDSCP REPAIRS:PDS AUG LDSCP REPAIR:RYCREST RD 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 LETTERING FOR NEW B&S TRUCK SALES TAX 001-162-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 LOT BOOK REPORT:RESID IMPR PRG 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPORT:RESID IMPR PRG 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPORT:RESID IMPR PRG 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPONT:RESID IMPR PRG 165-199-999-5250 REPAIRS TO PW AIRLESS SPRAYER 001-164-601-5215 EE COMPUTER PRGM:R.GILLILAND 001-1175 JUL-AUG DESIGN-MERCANTILE BLDG 210-190-167-5802 HARDWARE SUPPLIES -FIRE DEPT HARDWARE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT HARDWARE SUPPLIES PW NAINT HARDWARE SUPPLIES CITY HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES CRC HARDWARE SUPPLIES TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES SR CENTER HARDWARE SUPPLIES TCC HARDWARE SUPPLIES PW NAINT 001-171-999-5212 001-171-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 340-199-701-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 2,001.62 14,319.72 971.27- 90,811.00 70.00- 7.00 9,081.10' 883.12 1,231.20 2,535.20 2,056.00 1,405.69 1,648.80 1,465.60 1#465.60 80.00 83.14 143.50 109.71 81.31 120.41 75.30 2.93 600.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 197.53 2,000.00 210.00 38.28 114.78 58.69 109.91 123.98 331.22 481.93 173.99 153.78 19.90 71.74 CHECK AMOUNT 15,350.07 81,666.90 12,691.21 80.00 538.07 78.23 1,050.00 197.53 2,000.00 210.00 VOUCHRE2 09/07/00 lh55 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 64412 09/07/00 64413 09/07/00 64414 09/07/00 64414 09/07/00 64415 09/07/00 64416 09/07/00 64416 09/07/00 64416 09/07/00 64417 09/07/00 64418 09/07/00 64419 09/07/00 64420 09/07/00 64421 09/07/00 64421 09/07/00 64422 09/07/00 64423 09/07/00 64424 09/07/00 64425 09/07/00 64425 09/07/00 64425 09/07/00 64425 09/07/00 64426 09/07/00 64427 09/07/00 64428 09/07/00 64429 09/07/00 64429 09/07/00 64430 09/07/00 64430 09/07/00 64431 09/07/00 64432 09/07/00 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HANSON, KATHy 002372 HARMON, JUDY 002372 HARMON, JUDY HERNANDEZ, NARCELA 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY 004217 HYDRO TEN COMPANY 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY 003319 INLAND ENTERTAINMENT RO 1/2 PAGE AD:HOT SUMMER NIGHTS 003670 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR CO REPAIR BAY DOUR #2 ~ STN 84 004245 INLAND VALLEY APPLIANCE 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS 004079 JENKENS & GILEHRIST 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC 003631 004051 002519 002519 004025 004025 004087 LOWERS MAGNESS, ROBERT T ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCSD 190-180-999-5212 REFUND:COOKING-VEGETARIAN/VEGA 190-183-4982 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 REFUND:COOKING-VEGETARIAN/VEGA 190-183-4982 HOSE REEL FOR PUBLIC WORKS 001-164-601-5215 FREIGHT 001-164-601-5215 SALES TAX 001-164-601-5215 280-199-999-5362 001-171-999-5212 001-171-999-5212 190-186-999-5250 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5211 001-130-999-5247 210-165-631-5801 280-199-999-5271 001-111-999-5118 001-111-999-5118 001-111-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 REPAIR STOREFRONT A/C-TARGET C 001-170-999-5229 REPAIR OVEN AT FIRE STN 84 POOL SANITIZIHG CHEMICALS EMAIL MONTHLY SUPPORT & HAINT CREDIT:CEASED WATSON CONNECTIN JUL GENERAL LEGAL SVCS BIOLOGICAL SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE ROD RUN BANNERS CLEAN/STORAGE TEMP HELP W/E 07/09 CAMMAROTA TEMP HELP W/E 07/09 CAMMAROTA TENP HELP W/E 08/06 CANMAROTA TEMP HELP W/E 08/06 CANMAROTA KLEINFELDER INC SLURRY SEAL PRGM: PWO0-13 L 0 R GEOTECHNICAL GROO GEOTECH SVCS:IST ST EXTENSION LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC FIRE ALARM WALL SIGNS:CRC LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC FREIGHT LIGHTING CONTRACT SERVI FENCING @ NARGARITA COMM PARK LIGHTING CONTRACT SERVI CREDIT:IO% RETENTION NAINT SUPPLIES - TCSD REFUND:CITATION FEE C#24154 001-164-601-5248 280-199-807-5804 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 210-190-172-5804 210-2035 190-180-999-5212 001-170-4055 ITEM AMOUNT 21.55 96.00 364.00 519.20 96.00 249.00 13,54 19.30 240.00 366.25 108.49 165.94 600.00 300.00- 399.00 400.14 172.70 144.54 188.10 277.20 145.53 145.00 654.00 13,542.00 83.60 7.46 5,317.20 S31.72- 191.07 25.00 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 1,699.75 96.00 883.20 96.00 281.84 240.00 366.25 108.49 165.94 300.00 399.00 400.14 172.70 755.37 145.00 654.00 13,542.00 91.06 4,785.48 191.07 25.00 VOUCHRE2 09/07/00 11:55 VOOCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 64433 09/07/00 64433 09/07/00 64433 09/07/00 64433 09/07/00 64433 09/07/00 64433 09/07/00 6/+433 09/07/00 64433 09/07/00 64434 09/07/00 64434 09/07/00 64435 09/07/00 64436 09/07/00 64437 09/07/00 64438 09/07/00 64438 09/07/00 64438 09/07/00 64438 09/07/00 64439 09/07/00 64440 09/07/00 64441 09/07/00 64442 09/07/00 64442 09/07/00 64443 09/07/00 64443 09/07/00 64444 09/07/00 64445 09/07/00 64446 09/07/00 64446 09/07/00 64447 09/07/00 64447 09/07/00 64448 09/07/00 64449 09/07/00 6/+450 09/07/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MASCARINA-VO, JUDITH 0008/+3 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING 001205 MCDERMOTT, TIM K. 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003427 MEYLER, JAMES A. 004238 MURRIETA, CITY OF 001986 MUSICAL AUDIO ENVIRONM 004182 MYBAR PRINTING 004182 MYBAR PRINTING 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT O'LEARY, TIM 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 003116 OLDE SAN DIEGO GAZETTE 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES OTT, WENDELL CITY OF TEMECULA VOOCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: CRC CUSTOOIAL SUPPLIES: MAINT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: NAINT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPL:T.V. MUSEUM CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: CRC TENP HELP W/E 8/20 EBON ELMER TEMP HELP W/E 8/20 EBON ELMER REFUND:DANCE-TEEN/ADULT HAWAII JUL PROF SVCS:PALA BR:PW 97-15 REIMB:NUNI TREASURERS CF:8/28 JUL SVCS:CALLE ARAGON:99-21CSD RET W/H:CALLE ARAGON:99-21CSD REV RET:CALLE ARAGON:99-21CSD CR:CALLE ARAGON:99-21CSD REIMB:ANNUAL LEAGUE CF:07/25 1/2 COST "DON/T BE RUDE" SIGNS MUSIC SERVICE: OLD TOWN MUSEUM BROCHURES SALES TAX BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS SALES TAX ADVERTISING:4TH OF JULY PARADE REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND BEG FILE, 2 HIGH DRAW 22" DEEP SALES TAX CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NIGHTS DUCK POND WATER TREATMENT SRV REIMB:MUSEUM ASSOC CF:7/27-30 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-18Z-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-182'999-5212 340-199-702'5212 340-199-702-5212 190-185-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 340-199'701'5118 340-199-702-5118 190-183-4982 210-165-631-5802 001-140-999-5258 210-190-169-5804 210-2035 210'2035 210'190'169'5804 190-180-999-5258 001-170-999-5244 001-164-603-5250 190-185-999-5222 190-185-999-5222 001'140'999-5222 001'140'999'5222 190-180-999-5254 190-183-4982 001-170'999'5229 001-170-999'5229 001-161-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 280'199'999-5362 190-180-999-5250 190-185-999-5258 ITEM AMOUNT 398.68 15.73 220.14 9.27 142.97 157.02 216.73 103.06 210.00 70,00 70.00 2,129.15 42.00 75~866.38 7,586.64- 86.64 866.38- 562.91 66.33 59.50 4,199.00 325.42 335.75 26.02 171.23 40.00 59.99 4.65 79.14 30.72 1,000.00 800.00 6~.99 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 1,263.60 280.00 70.00 2#129.15 42.00 67,500,00 562.91 66.33 59.50 4,524.42 361.77 171.23 40.00 64,64 109.86 1,000.00 800.00 666.99 VOUCHRE2 09/07/00 11:55 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 6/,451 09/07/00 64452 09/07/00 64452 09/07/00 64453 09/07/00 64454 09/07/00 64455 09/07/00 6~456 09/07/00 6~456 09/07/00 64457 09/07/00 64458 09/07/00 6/,,458 09/07/00 64,459 09/07/00 64459 09/07/00 64459 09/07/00 (>4459 09/07/00 64459 09/07/00 64459 09/07/00 64459 09/07/00 64459 09/07/00 64460 09/07/00 64460 09/07/00 64461 09/07/00 64461 09/07/00 64461 09/07/00 64462 09/07/00 64462 09/07/00 64463 09/07/00 (>4464 09/07/00 6/+46/+ 09/07/00 64465 09/07/00 64466 09/07/00 64467 09/07/00 64.468 09/07/00 6/.468 09/07/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 002297 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONS PACWEST GROUP INC PACWEST GROUP INC PETTENG1LL, GAY 003133 PIC ENVIRONMENTAL $ERVI 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOUR 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN QUINLAN PUBLISHING GROU 000981 R H F INC 000981 R H F INC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RELOCATION FUNDS DISBURSEMENT REFUND: CEQA REVIEW: PA00-0209 REFUND:CEQA REVIEW:PAOO-0209 REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND INTER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:DIAZ RES INPROV PRGN:H SZYMANASKI PALM SERIES WASTE CONTAINER SALES TAX SUB:ZONING BULLETIN:D.UBNOSKE RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & NAINT RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:NAINT FACILITY 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:NAINT FACILITY 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:NAINT FACILITY 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:HAINT FACILITY 000947 GANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL 8LUEPRINTS:MARGARITA RD 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:MURRIETA CK BR 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS: PALA RD 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS: PALA RD 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PARKING CITATION ASSESSHNT JUL PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT CR:ADKAN ENGINEERS SERVICES REISSUE CK:JUL PRGS:P~95-08 REISSUE CK:RET PMT #5:PW95-08 000271 ROBERT BEIN WM FROST & JUL PROF SVS:TRAFFIC SIG:98-11 000271 ROBERT BEIN W/4 FROST & CR:EXCEEDS CONTRACT ANT: 98-11 004258 004258 00040] 000385 003804 000537 000537 SALAZAR, MARIANNE REIMB:SCACEO CERT PRGM:8/25-26 SCHNEIDER~ KEITH SCHNEIDER# KEITH NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINTENANCE: TES SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS SO CALXF EDISON SO CALIF EDISON AUG:Z-10-331-2153:PUJOL ST AUG:2-19-538-2262:VARIOUS MTRS ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-1652 001-161-4129 001-163-4129 190-18]-4982 001-165-999-5248 165-199-813-5804 190-185-999-5610 190-185-999-5610 001-161-999-5228 001-2030 001-170-999-5215 210-190-158-5804 210-190-158-5804 210-190-158-5804 210-190-158-5804 210-165-706-5801 210-165-707-5802 210-165-668-5802 210-165-631-5804 001-2260 001-2265 280-199-807-5804 280-199-807-5804 280-2035 210-165-627-5802 210-165-627-5802 001-161-~-5261 320-199-c~P-5250 320-199-999-5250 190-186-999-5212 001-162-999-5214 190-183-999-5330 190-184-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 iTEM AMOUNT 82,500.00 594.25 45.00 40.00 1,000.00 1,040.00 8,780.00 680.45 89.00 208.76 36.50 43.68 445.12 26.94 313.53 24.7~ 23.27 10.88 197.83 1,267.00 385,00 669.49- 283,623.32 28,362.33' 427.77 129.54- 26.79 535.00 520.00 783.20 68.08 1,756.00 1,193.81 94.38 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 82,500.00 639.25 40.00 1,000.00 1,040.00 9,460.45 89.00 245.26 1,085.98 1,652.00 254,591.50 298.23 26.79 1,055.00 783.20 68.08 1,756.00 VOUCHRE2 09/07/00 11:55 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 64468 09/07/00 64468 09/07/00 64468 09/07/00 64468 09/07/00 64468 09107/00 64468 09/07/00 64468 09/07/00 64469 09/07/00 64469 09/07/00 64470 09/07/00 64471 09/07/00 64472 09/07/00 64473 09/07/00 64474 09/07/00 64474 09/07/00 64474 09/07/00 64474 09/07/00 64475 09/07/00 64476 09/07/00 64477 09/07/00 64477 09/07/00 64477 09/07/00 64478 09/07/00 64479 09/07/00 64480 09/07/00 001022 64481 09/07/00 004261 64482 09/07/00 003970 64483 09/07/00 002109 64483 09/07/00 002109 64483 09/07/00 002109 64483 09/07/00 002109 64484 09/07/00 000345 64485 09/07/00 CITY OF TEMEDULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NAME 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON ITEM DESCRIPTION 2-19-683-3255 FRONT ST PED AUG:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS AUG:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS AUG:2-15-671-5518: PALA RD AUG:2-O2-502-8077:MAINT FAC AUG:2-20-966-8714:SANTIAGO RD AUG:2-20-817-9929:POLICE OFFIC 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES: POLICE 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR TCC PEST CONTROL SERVICES 000293 STADIUM PIZZA STRACK~ MARIA SWEETSIR, MAK! TAN# DANA 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANy 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION TERRANOVA, LISA THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO VERIZON CALIFORNIA WESTCON ELEVATOR INC REFRESHMENTS: STAFF TRAINING REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND INTER REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND BEG REISSUE CK:REFD SECURITY DEPST MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATIC SUNSHINE FUND NANEPLATE: D. HANSEN LOCKSMITH SVCS: PARKS LOCKSMITH SVCS: CRC LOCKSMITH SVCS: CRC REL WARRANTY RET:PW97-10CSD REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND BEG RENEWAL:FAIR LABOR HANDBOOK AUG XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE AUG ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN MISC SUPPLIES: PW MAINT WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN SUPPLIES:OLD TWN RESTORATION WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN SALES TAX WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN MISC SUPPLIES: PW MAINT XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER MAINT: STATION 84 ZACCURI, GABRIELLE REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT:LDOO-O34GR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001'164-603-5319 190"180-999'5240 193-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 340-199-702-5240 190-180'999'5319 001-170-999-5229 001-170-999"5250 190-184-999-5250 190'180'999-5261 190-183'4982 190-183-4982 190-183-4990 001'163-999'5220 001-165-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 190-186-999-5301 001-2170 001'120"999'5222 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 210-2035 190-183-4982 001-150-999-5228 320-199-999-5208 190'185'999-5250 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601"5218 001-171-999-5215 001-2670 ITEM AMOUNT 377.96 26.87 916,97 126.89 1#376.53 22.09 221.74 29.00 36.00 77.19 40.00 40.00 100.00 46.70 46.70 46.71 65.59 159.84 13.20 27.65 30.86 28.24 11,760.67 40.00 254.00 98.50 95.00 21.50 6,264.00 485.46 104.77 148.70 995.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 4,357.24 65.00 77.19 40.00 40.00 100.00 205.70 159.84 13.20 86.75 11,760.67 40.00 254.00 98.50 95.00 6,875.73 140.70 995.00 TOTAL CHECKS 627,784.65 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 120,374.06 4,824.42 71,869.97 28,281.34 7,457.97 305.99 6#124.36 6,257.61 368.55 4#363.00 1~714.04 6,652.53 TOTAL 258f593.84 VCUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64486 64487 64488 64489 64490 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 220971 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 221085 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 09/11/00 09/11/00 09/11/00 09/11/00 09/12/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 ONSTOTT, JULIE BRADLEY-OSORIO, HOLLIE ROSEBERRY, ANGELA PETTENGILL, GAY ANNE 004259 CRAMER, AMY 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000883 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 1NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-2900 190-2900 190-2900 190-2900 190-183-999-5330 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 422.40 23,713.23 406.58 5,447.99 14.30 358.82 118.40 220.18 7/.02 956.88 235.86 488.17 5,771,63 106.08 1,495.79 2.34 86.87 Z0.33 55.42 29.39 232.88 70.81 132.11 98.10 2.57 110.34 2.23 .49 6.78 .73 6,489.69 120.77 1,189.98 4.23 78.85 57,35 16.43 200.88 51.15 98.53 CHECK AMOUNT 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 422.40 40,041.08 8,563.03 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 64495 09/14/00 VENDOR NAME 001985 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 003552 64494 09/14/00 005552 64495 09/14/00 A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIA ITEM DESCRIPTXON REG:CEQA IO/4/O0:R.PREISENDANZ 003552 CANCER 003552 EXP PROT 003552 EXP PROT 003552 EXP PROT 003552 HOSP IC 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD SUPPLIES: TINY TOTS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5261 001-2330 001-2330 190-2330 320-2330 001-2330 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 190-183-999-5320 ITEM AMOUNT 145.00 282.30 202.90 55.80 27.90 17.50 614.40 112.00 9.60 3.20 9.60 43.07 CHECK AMOUNT 145.00 1,335.20 43.07 64496 09/14/00 64496 09/14/00 64496 09/14/00 64496 09/14/00 64496 09/14/00 64497 09/14/00 64498 09/14/00 64499 09/14/00 64500 09/14/00 64500 09/14/00 64501 09/14/00 64502 09/14/00 64502 09/14/00 6/.503 09/14/00 64504 09/14/00 64505 09/14/00 64506 09/14/00 64507 09/14/00 64508 09/14/00 64509 09/14/00 64509 09/14/00 64509 09/14/00 64509 09/14/00 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 000427 ARTESIA IMPLEMENT INC 000427 ARTESIA IMPLEMENT INC 004206 BANUELOS, TERESA BEST FIRE PROTECTION CO BEST FIRE PROTECTION CO 004252 BIG DADDY & THE MONEYSH 004273 BLUES TESTAMENT 003126 BOOMGAARDEN# DENNIS BRAM, SUSAN 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES BUTTERFIELD INN MOTEL 003553 C I G N A 003553 C [ G N A 003553 C I G N A 003553 C I G N A 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP SEP OLD TOWN TEM. BILLBOARD MEMBERSHIP DUES: D. HOGAN OFFSITE RECORDS STORAGE REPAZR & MAINT OF TCSD TRAILER REPAIR & MAINT OF TCSD TRACTOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS RF:INSTALL HOOD DUCT SYSTEM RF:INSTALL HOOD DUCT SYSTEM ENTERTAINMENT: SUMMER NIGHTS ENTERTAINMENT: SUMMER NIGHTS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT SEPT:OLD TWN RESTROOM RENTAL REIM:FACADE IMPROVE: NEW SIGN 003553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD 001-2310 190-2310 194-2310 330-2310 340-2310 280-199-999-5562 001-161-999-5226 001-120-999-5277 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-183-999-5330 001-171-4036 001-171-4037 280-199-999-5362 280-199-999-5362 190-183-999-5330 190-2900 280-199-999-5234 165-199-813-5804 001-2380 165-2380 190-2380 192-2380 589.20 63.42 1.68 5.58 24.15 1,751.00 314.00 ?70.89 8.73 113.38 170.00 225.00 144.00 300.00 500.00 319.20 100.00 826.00 1#616.25 1,459.59 25.85 269.69 .61 684.03 1,751.00 314.00 770.89 122.11 170.00 369.00 300.00 300.00 319.20 100.00 826.00 I~616.25 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 3 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUHBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64509 64511 64512 64512 64512 6~.513 64514 64515 64516 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64517 64518 64518 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003553 09/14/00 003138 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA CAL MAT 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVAT 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVAT 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVAT 000647 CALIF DEPT OF CONSUMER 000413 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GA 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 003553 LTD 193-2380 003553 LTD 194-2380 003553 LTD 280-2380 003553 LTD 300-2380 003553 LTD 320-2380 003553 LTD 330-2380 003553 LTD 340-2380 003553 STD 001-2500 003553 STD 165-2500 003553 STD 190-2500 003553 STD 192-2500 003553 STD 193-2500 003553 STD 194-2500 003553 STD 280-2500 003553 STD 300-2500 003553 STD 320-2500 003553 STD 330-2500 003553 STD 340-2500 PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 20.91 5.59 12.74 7.33 65.64 12.08 34.84 2,037.31 36.08 376.44 .86 29.20 7.79 17.78 10.23 91.61 16.85 48.63 4,587.65 001-164-601-5218 384.12 384.12 APR-JUN 2000 STRONG MOTION PMT 001-2280 APR-JUN 2000 STRONG MOTION PMT 001-2290 LESS SEISMIC EDUCATION FEES OO1-16Z-4ZZ9 CPA LICENSE RENWAL:T.MCDERMOTT 001-140-999-5226 1,679.28 4,204.45 294.19' 5,589.54 PERMIT:LAKE & STREAMBED 200.00 200.00 190-180-999-5250 154.00 154.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES: C. FLOHR 190-180-999-5226 100.00 100,00 190-184-999-5301 25.70 25.70 HELIUM RENTAL: TCC 005554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 002534 CATERERS CAFE 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRESHMENTS:PLANNING CONM NTG 001-161-999-5260 REFRESHMENTS:CITY MANAGER MTG 001-110-999-5260 612.63 8.13 128.71 .33 10.73 2.59 4.87 3.24 26.00 9.75 18.52 825.50 17.67 27.23 44.90 64519 09/14/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING: CRC 190-182-999-5250 50.00 64519 09/14/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC FIRE SYSTEM INSPECTIONS: CRC 190-182-999-5250 150.00 64519 09/14/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING:SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 45.00 245.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 64520 09/14/00 004203 CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIO 004203 AR CHILD 64521 09/14/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64521 09/14/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64521 09/14/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64521 09/14/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64521 09/14/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64521 09/14/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 64522 09114/00 004003 CRISP, ALBERT K. 64522 09/14/00 004003 CRISP, ALBERT K. 64522 09/14/00 004003 CRISP, ALBERT K. 64522 09/14/00 004003 CRISP, ALBERT K. ALARM MONITORING: CITY HALL ALARM MONITORING: MAINT FAC ALARM MONITORING: OLD TOWN ALARM MONITORING:T.V. MUSEUM ALARM MONITORING: CHAPEL ALARM MONITORING: TCC ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-2140 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 001-164-603-5250 190-185-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 AUG PROF SVCS: PW 001-163-999-5248 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 001-1182 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR JUN 001-1182 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR JUL 001-1182 64523 09/14/00 002106 D A FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 64524 09/14/00 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC 64525 09/14/00 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK 64526 09/14/00 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPOHATIO 64527 09/14/00 002981 DYNA MED E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64528 09/14/00 001380 64529 09/14/00 64529 09/14/00 64529 09/14/00 64529 09/14/00 PROPANE GAS 001-164-601-5218 AUG 2000 SPECIAL EVENT PREMIUM 300-2180 SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL AQUATIC SUPPLIES TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 CHU TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 GALLARDO TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 LUQUE TEMP HELP ~/E 8/25 LUQUE TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 7/14 HANSEN TEMP HELP ~/E 7/14 HANSEN TEMP HELP ~/E 7/14 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 7/14 BANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 HANSEN TEMP HELP ~/E 8/25 HANSEN TEMP HELP ~/E 8/25 HANSEN ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS: CRC ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS: CRC ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:PARKS SALES TAX 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 64530 09/14/00 64530 09/14/00 64530 09/14/00 64530 09/14/00 64550 09/14/00 64530 09/14/00 64530 09/14/00 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES 001-164-601-5218 190-183-999-5510 001-164-604-5118 001-165-999-5118 540-199-701-5118 340-199-702-5118 340-199-701-5118 340-199-702-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-180-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-120-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-180-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-120-999-5118 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-150-999-5230 001-100-999-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 190-180-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT 12.50 210.00 135.00 87.00 165.00 75.00 210.00 1,120.00 2.91- 2.51- 2.33- 82.50 41.03 87.18 88.89 460.68 1,725.60 1,922.94 426.60 142.20 170.10 56.70 488.16 127.13 844.11 167.80 244.08 218,66 905.12 259.34 53.60 41.70 362.28 28.08 24.40 17.81 21.98 15.55 19.51 35.32 23.95 CHECK AMOUNT 12.50 882.00 1,112.25 82.50 41.03 87.18 88.89 460.68 7,698.54 485.66 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CRECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEH AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 64530 09/14/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5Z30 12.20 170.72 64531 09/14/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 64531 09/14/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64532 09/14/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 D00177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT 6/+533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64533 09/14/00 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 64534 09/14/00 004159 GOODENOUGH, DONNA 64535 09/14/00 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY I TITLE REPORT:R.C.RD/I-15:95-12 210-165-601-5801 LABELS:PW TREE-REPLANTING PRGM 001-164-604-5250 XX-7824 JC:CF:CA CTYS 9/7-9 001-100-999~5258 XX-9277 RR:CF:CA CITIES: 9/7-9 001-100-999-5258 XX-2292 GR:PUB:TAX-EXEMPT FIN 001-140-999-5228 XX-2292 GR:MTG:INTERVIEW PANEL 001-140-999-5260 XX-6165 G.Y.: MTG: HHRC WRKSHP 001-150-999-5260 XX-6165 G.Y.:RUSSIAN TRNSLATOR 001-150-999-5250 XX-1405 D.U.:PLANNING COMM MTG 001-161-999-5260 XX-0515 G.T.:CITY MANAGER MTG 001-161-999-5260 XX-0432 T. ELMO: CF: ICBO 001-162-999-5258 XX-0432 T.ELMO:MTG:INTERV~ PNl 001-162-999-5260 XX-1143 HP:CA CITIES: 7/26-28 190-180-999-5258 XX-1143 HP: MTG: INTERVW PANEL 190-180-999-5260 MISC OFFICE SUPPL:CITY COUNCIL MISC OFFICE SUPPL:CITY HANAGER MISC OFFICE SUPPL:CITY CLERK MISC OFFICE SUPPL:FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPL:PLANNING MISC OFFICE SUPPL:BLDG & SAFET MISC OFFICE SUPPL:ECON DEV MISC OFFICE SUPPL:T V MUSEUM MISC OFFICE SUPPL:TCSD NISC OFFICE SUPPL:TCC NISC OFFICE SUPPL:RECORDS NGMT MISC OFFICE SUPPL:ECON DEV 001-100-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-111-999-5220 190-185-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-184-999-5301 001-120-999-5277 001-111-999-5220 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 ALARM MONITORING: TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5229 1,000.00 500.00 2,237.06 1,864.41 20.00 70.80 66.43 230.06 29.19 37.50 607.00 100.01 539.90 61.47 315.13 116.82 312.67 277.61 94.49 100.78 38.27 32.31 201.31 192.87 130.32 158.53 144.00 55.50 1,500.00 5,863.83 1,971.11 144.00 55.50 64536 09/14/00 002906 HEMET FENCE C04PANY LA SERENA PARK SITE REPAIR 190-180-999-5212 175.00 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHffi~RK INC 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 211.25- 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 189.95 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.87 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 1.60 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.87 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 208.05 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 187.54 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.86 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.21 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 .81 64537 09/14/00 002107 HIGHHARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.89 175.00 416.10 VOUCHRE2 09/14/00 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64538 64538 64538 64538 64538 64538 64538 64539 64540 64541 64542 64543 64544 64545 64546 64547 64548 64549 64550 64551 64552 64553 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64554 64555 11:05 CHECK DATE 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER MANE 000194 C H A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C H A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C N A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C N A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C H A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL 000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLDG OF IOMA 003280 JON LASKIN BAND 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL# IN 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 003631 KLEINFELDER INC 004266 KURTIR CAFARO PAINTING 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC LAVIN, DINA 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES LONG BEACH COURTYARD 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS MASCARINA-VO, JUDITH 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE CONP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003329 MILLER, HENRY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CQHP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COHP POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS FIRE/CODE SEMINAR:NM:9/18/00 PUB: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE GUIDE ENTERTAINMENT: SUMMER NIGHTS JUL PROF SVCS:PALA RD BG 97-15 TEMP HELP M/E 8/27 KELLY JUL PROF SVCS:ARAGON:99-21CSD RES IMPROVE PRGM: FLORES~ RAUL VAR PK/PK LOT LIGHTING REPAIRS EXCURSION: DAY CAMP 8/17 REFUND:GYMNASTICS-EARLy TUMB RECRUITMENT AD: SR PLANNER HTL:APA L.B.CF:CD/DT:9/16-18 QTY 4 STREET SIGNS - PW REFUND: GYMNASTICS-TUMBL TOTS 003076 DENT REV 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENT ADV 003076 DENTALML 003076 OENTALML 003076 OENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML REIMB:LEAG CALF CITIES:7/26-28 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 190-186-999-5250 001-171-999-5261 001'140'999-5228 280'199'999'5362 210-165-631-5801 330-199-999-5118 210-190-169-5804 165'199-813-5804 190'180-999-5212 190-183-999-5340 190-183-4982 001'150-999-5254 001'161'999'5258 001-164-601-5244 190-183-4982 001-2090 001-2340 001-2090 001-2340 165-2340 190-2340 193-2340 194-2340 280-2340 330-2340 340-2340 190-180-999-5258 ITEM AMOUNT 2,378.97 249.99 572.54 30.01 16.04 108.35 50.00 118.53 460.00 110.00 100.00 497.50 380.16 1,250.00 1,365.00 754.50 288.81 43.00 100.00 7~2.48 193.95 43.00 24.16- 24.16 24.16 2#964.92 112.13 485.32 16.20 4.86 67.27 16.20 71.76 5.38 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 3,405.90 118.53 460.00 110.00 100.00 497.50 380.16 1~250.00 1~365.00 754.50 288.81 43.00 100.00 732.48 193.95 43.00 3°762.82 5.38 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 64556 09/14/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 64556 09/14/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS: W. HUGHES SALES TAX 001-164-604-5222 001-164-604-5222 102.50 7.94 110.44 64557 09/14/00 MOHAMMED, CASSANDRA REFUND: EXERCISE ' HATHA YOGA 190-183'4982 24.00 24.00 64558 09/14/00 003396 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP "FRONT DESK"SEM:JH/JR/LB:11-15 190-180-999-5261 417.00 417.00 64559 09/14/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT RECRUIT AD:VARIOUS POSITIONS 001-150-999-5254 64559 09/14/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT RECRUIT AD:ASST ENG 001-150-999-5254 64559 09/14/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT DISPLAY AD:SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199-999-5362 64559 09/14/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT DISPLAY AD:COMM.THEATER MTG 280-199-999-5362 158.12 11.80 149.25 149.25 468.42 64560 09/14/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CM OFFICE 001-110-999-5220 64560 09/14/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CM OFFICE 001-110-999-5220 11.44 40.58 52.02 64561 09/14/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIMT 001-164-601-5214 64561 09/14/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT 190-180-999-5214 64561 09/14/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 99.54 321.96 295.40 716.90 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUH, PNE PENS HEALTH INSUR, PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR, PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR, PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR, PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH IHSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS tEALTH [NSUR. PRE PENS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS ~EALTH INSUR. PRE PERS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS iEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PENS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 001-2090 296.86 000245 AETNA 165-2090 160.86 000245 AETNA 190-2090 43.40 000245 AETNA 280-2090 53.62 000245 8LSHIELD 001-2090 62.39 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 103.67 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 113.80 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 546.48 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 103.17 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 39.21 000245 KAISER 001-2090 170.48 000245 PACCARE 001-2090 252.48 000245 PACCARE 190-2090 200.33 000245 PACCARE 340-2090 16.92 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 265.65 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 2,513.37- 000245 UNI 001-2090 84.05 000245 AETNA 001-2090 721.38 000245 AETNA 165-2090 187.49 000245 AETNA 190-2090 421.06 000245 AETNA 280-2090 62.49 000245 AETNA 330-2090 89.31 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 1,266.47 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 376.20 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 230.96 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 4,890.71 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 1,390.75 000245 NELTHNET 193-2090 90.32 000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 27.10 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 .55 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 665.30 000245 KAISER 001-2090 2,362.61 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS 64562 09/14/00 000245 PERS ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 MAXICARE 001-2090 166.00 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 001-2090 3,911.92 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 190-2090 745.54 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 340-2090 119.19 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC 001-2090 608.00 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 3,256.35 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 001-2090 2,371.40 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 153.92 HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI 001-2090 1,983.01 64563 09/14/00 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 154.60 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-185-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-185-999-5228 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5261 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5242 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5242 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999~5320 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5261 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5230 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-165-999-5260 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5261 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5218 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5220 64564 09/14/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 64566 09/14/00 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-165-999-5250 64566 09/14/00 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-185-999-5250 64566 09/14/00 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5250 64567 09/14/00 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC JUL DSGN SVCS:CHS AQUATIC FAC 210-190-170-5802 25.12 12.55 27.54 47.17 22.00 17.02 10.74 20.00 6.44 3.44 27.16 15.96 10.00 19.48 10.76 14.20 50.00 40.91 13.86 9.98 14.86 13.77 I0.00 29.50 14.38 32.28 9.85 8.00 47.78 12.91 35.34 2,484.03 26,098.03 154.60 536,97 96.03 2,484.03 64568 09/14/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:MAINT FAC NODS 210-190-158-5804 155.30 64568 09/14/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRXNTS:MAINT FAC NODS 210-190-158-5804 300.00 64568 09/14/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:PALA RD IMPRV 210-165-668-5802 29.67 484.97 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64569 64569 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64570 64571 64571 64571 64571 64571 64571 64571 64571 64571 64571 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 09/14/00 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A 09/14/00 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCNO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCNO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCNO CAR WASH 09/14/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 64572 09/14/00 RENTZEL, AMY 64573 64574 09/14/00 001365 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN 09/14/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000557 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 09/14/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 64575 ITEM DESCRIPTION OCT-DEC BUS.PK.ASSOC.DUES:DIAZ OCT-DEC SUS.PK.ASSOC.DUES-C.H. SEP 01-08-00035-0 HWY 79S AUG 01-06-66000-3 CHLDRN MUS AUG 01-06-79380-1 CHLDRN MUS AUG 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST AUG 01-02-98000-0 STN #84 AUG 01-02-98010-0 STN #84 AUG VARIO~JS WATER METERS AUG VARIOUS WATER METERS AUG VARIOIJS WATER METERS AUG VARIOtJS WATER METERS AUG VARIOiJS WATER METERS AUG VARIOUS WATER METERS AUG VARIOUS WATER METERS AUG VARIOUS WATER METERS AUG VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CiTY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CiTY VEHICLE DETAiLiNG & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLE CITY VEHICLE DETAILING REFUND: DANCE-TOT PRE-DANCE RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT - TCC DAY CAMP SUPPLIES SEP 2-09-330-3030 WINCHESTER SEP 2-09-330-3139 WINCHESTER AUG 2-20-798-3248 R.C.RD.PED. AUG 2-00-397-5059 COMM SVC UTL AUG 2-02-351-5281CRC AUG 2-02-351-5281CRC SEP 2-01-202-7~30 VARIOUS MTRS AUG 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-18-017-8972 MARGARITA SEP 2-19-524-9867 WINCHESTER SEPT 2-18-373-9903 MARGARITA SEP VARIOUS ELECTRIC METERS SEP VARIOUS ELECTRIC METERS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-604-5226 340-199-701-5226 001-165-999-5250 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 280-1990 001-171-999-5240 001-171-999-5240 001-164-603-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 190-1~-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 001-162-999-5214 001-110-999-5214 001-110-999-5263 001-165-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 001-161-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 001-164-604-5214 001-164-604-5263 190-180-999-5214 190-183-4982 190-184-999-5250 190-183-999-5340 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 192-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 1,511.43 1,099.22 425.64 1.72 1.72 51.89 11.68 495.98 465.72 13,976.07 152.64 1,206.31 350.41 195.64 6,396.38 595.27 67.21 18.00 48.95 81.00 28.00 24.00 18.00 6.00 6.00 27.42 42.00 75.00 326.00 59.92 186.7~ 204.19 14.11 2,175.04 3,685.92 2,794.00 28,241.06 3,978.36 201.17 36.16 295.88 13,724.69 804.53 CHECK AMOUNT 2,610.65 24,394.28 299.37 75.00 326.00 59.92 56,341.84 64576 09/14/00 003467 SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS REPLACE PARTS-PACE CLOCK LENS 190-186-999-5301 66.75 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64576 64576 64577 64578 64578 64578 64578 64578 64578 64578 64579 64580 64580 64580 64580 64580 64580 64580 64580 64580 64580 64581 64582 64583 64584 64584 64584 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 003467 SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS 003467 SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET C ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT REPLACE PARTS-MOVEMENT & GEARS 190-186-999-5301 FREIGHT 190-186-999-5301 CARPET CLEANING - CITY HALL 340-1~-701-5250 71.20 29.00 1#650.00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 307.50 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 67.65 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.15 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.04 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 20.50 001547 TEAHSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 20.50 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 6.16 003442 TEMECULA BUILDING COMPA 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P 00367'/ TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL FACADE IMPRV-MUSICIANS ~RKSHOP 280-199-813-5804 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 CITY HALL PLUMBING SERVICES 340-199-701-5250 MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PD 001-170-999-5214 AWARDS-SPORTS WNTR/SPR 2000 190-187-999-5313 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR B&S OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW ADMIN 001-162-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 1,749.96 4,811.05 225.00 1,239.00 13.75 197.25 41.25 75.00 365.00 477.35 111.25 70.00 559.32 1,269.51 1~.54 104.08 265.94 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRANSAHERZCA 003560 AD&D 001-2360 141,38 64585 09/14/00 OO3560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 1.88 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360 29.71 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 192-2360 .08 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360 2.48 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 194-2360 .59 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360 1.12 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300-2360 .74 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 6.00 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360 2.25 64585 09/14/00 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 340-2360 4.27 1~.95 1,650.00 430.50 1o749.96 7,555.90 70.00 559.32 1,269.51 547.56 190.50 64586 09/14/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001'2080 9f075.97 64586 09/14/00 001065 U S C M ~EST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 101.16 64586 09/14/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,875.48 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 09/14/00 11:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64586 64586 64586 64586 64586 64586 64586 64587 64587 64587 64587 64587 64587 64587 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COHP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMp) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RET1R 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 330-2160 340-2160 ITEM AMOUNT 3.74 91.68 18.75 113.89 83.33 1,333.32 190.01 1,051.16 87.60 1,242.12 23.96 25.24 72.64 7.74 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 283.69 645B 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 11.00 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 33.76 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .04 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 1.90 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .37 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 U~ 280-2120 3.90 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 300-2120 1.25 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 9.00 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 4.00 64588 09/14/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .59 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 64589 64589 64590 64590 64590 64590 64590 64590 004216 VALLEY MONUMENT COMPANY 004216 VALLEY MONUMENT COMPANY 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN WOODBRIDGE INLAND ESTAT 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 64591 64591 64592 64593 2 BRONZE PLAQUES-PALA BRIDGE SALES TAX 210-165-631-5804 210-165-631-5804 AUG XXX-1289 PRATT SEPT XXX-1941PTA CD TTACSD AUG XXX-2626 POLICE DEPT AUG XXX-2629 NAGOAR AUG XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE AUG XXX-S509 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 SEP ACCESS-CRC OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 SEP ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 MAINT SUPPLIES-PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5218 REFUND:PERMITS B99-3490-3500 001-162-4203 JUL SUPPLIES/NAINT 5343 COPIER 330-199-999-5217 AUG LEASE OF 5021 COPIER ~ TCC 190-184-999-5239 64594 64594 09/14/00 09/14/00 09/14/00 377,50 30.36 68.13 56.77 277.64 70.13 38.43 131.95 320.00 320.00 31.99 5,565.94 242.77 67.08 CHECK AMOUNT 12,887.33 2,510.46 349.50 407.86 ~+3,05 640.00 31.99 5,565.94 309.85 TOTAL CHECKS 258,593.84 VOUCHREZ CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 2 09/14/00 12:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 210 CAPITAL IHPROVENENT PROJ FUND TOTAL ANODNT 20,423.30 166#944.61 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/14/00 12:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 64597 09/26/00 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI AUG PROF SVCS:SR CTR EXPANSION 210-190-163-5802 64598 09/26/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D FY99-O0 RATE ADJ LAW ENFORCMNT 001-2030 64599 09/26/00 000271 ROBERT BEIN t4M FROST & 64599 09/26/00 000271 ROBERT BEIN ~rM FROST & 64599 09/26/00 000271 ROBERT BEIN ~rM FROST & JUL ENG SVCS:I15-79S/SANTIAGO 210-165-662-5802 JUL ENG SVCS:I15-79S/SANTIAGO 210-165-705-5802 JUL DSGN SVCS:DIAZ REALIGNMENT 210-165-632-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 6,268.78 146,521.31 4,628.66 1,725.86 7,800.00 PAGE I CHECK AMOUNT 6,268.78 TOTAL CHECKS 166,944.61 ITEM 3 APPROVAL~ CITYATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINAN CITYMANAGER CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council James O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~/ September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Consideration of The Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation "Race For The Cure" Sponsorship Request Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the City Council approve the event sponsorship agreement with The Inland Empire Affiliate of The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. DISCUSSION: Staff has received a request from The Inland Empire Affiliate of The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, to provide city support costs for the Race For The Cure. The Foundation will also be applying for Community Services Funding, which will be presented before Council at a later date. The Race will be held at the Promenade Mall in Temecula, corner of Ynez and Winchester Road. on Sunday, October 22, 2000. This event is family-oriented, with something for everyone. In addition to the Team Competition, the schedule includes Women's and Coed 5K Run/Walks, a family One- Mile Fun Run/Walk, live entertainment, exhibits, a Guidant Kids' Expo, a health and fitness expo, refreshments and pdze drawings. A special ceremony will be held that pays tdbute to the hundreds of breast cancer survivors expected to participate. The Race will serve as a fundraiser for The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, a non-profit organization that was established in 1982. 75% of the net Race proceeds will fund local breast health education programs to spread the lifesaving message of eady detection to thousands of Inland Empire men and women. 25% of the net Race proceeds support cutting edge research grants of the Komen Foundation. The Komen Foundation is a national organization with a volunteer network in the Inland Empire and other affiliates across the country fighting to eradicate breast cancer as a life-threatening disease by advancing research, education, screening and treatment. In just eighteen years, The Komen Foundation has raised more than $200 million, becoming one of the word's leading catalysts in the fight against breast cancer. Races will be held in 107 U.S. cities and two foreign countries in 2000 with over one million participants expected. In the United States an estimated 175,000 women and 1,300 men will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 43,700 women and 400 men will die from the disease this year. Every day in the Inland Empire a woman dies of breast cancer. Last years Inland Empire Race was held in Temecula and proved to be the largest inaugural race in California with 7,000 participants and 100 race teams. A total of $486,000 was raised. For a breakdown of project allocations, please refer to the Inland Empire Affiliate Komen Grant's Committee Projects 2000 Progress Report Summary found in Attachment B. The balance of all the requests listed in the report was paid in August 2000, The attendance for this year's event is estimated between 10,000 - 12,000 attendees. The goal for the 2000 raca was set at $400,000. On September 6, 2000, the Race Leadership Committee proudly announced that they have exceeded their goal by raising $500,000 with additional funds still to come as the race nears. Businesses are encouraged to support this event by getting their employees involved. Many local and out-of-area businesses have registered their teams. The City of Temecula employees are planning to enter a team in the event. In January 2000, the committees began implementing plans for the Inland Empire's Race, Event promotions began in May of this year which have included event posters, website, pdnt media, radio, and the distribution of over 300,000 entry forms. This event has gained wide support by our community, throughout the Inland Empire and on a national level. A sampling of Temecula sponsors includes Guidant, Home Depot, Milgard Windows, Plant Equipment, Albertsons, Say-On and The Promenade Mall. National sponsors include: Amedcan Aidines, Johnson & Johnson, Ford, Yoplait, New Balance and the National Football League. In addition to its pdmary aim of fundraising for The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, the event has the potential to provide toudsm and economic benefits to the City of Temecula. The Race For The Cure will give exposure for Temecula both on a local and national level. The event should increase toudsm revenue for the City's restaurants, hotels, shopping areas, and the wineries. In an effort to better understand this event, and to determine potential costs, staff has met with the event sponsors. Staff estimates that should Council choose to approve this sponsorship, City support costs such as police, fire, and public works would be approximately $6,863.61. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that City support costs for this event would be approximately $6,863.61. Funds have been included in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget of the vadous support departments. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Attachment B - Attachment C - Attachment D- Sponsorship Benefits Race for the Cure Packet and Komen Grant's Committee Projects 2000 Report Estimated City Support Costs Sponsorship Agreement ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS The City of Temecula's benefits as a Bronze Sponsor of The Inland Empire Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Race For The Cure: · City logo/or name will appear on flyers, advertisements, and program relating to the event. · Due to the timing of producing posters and promotional items, Temecula's name/logo will not be able to be displayed this year. To compensate for this loss of recognition, The City logo/or name will appear on posters and promotional items relating to the 2001 event. · Free booth space at event · City banner displayed · City name on all press releases · City of Temecula advertisement in the official program ATTACHMENT B - RACE FOR THE CURE PACKET AND KOMEN GRANT'S COMMITTEE PROJECTS 2000 REPORT 2000 Inland Empire Race For The Cure® Team Competition Sponsored by Inland Valley Regional Medical Center Help us Reach our Goal... 150 Teams and $500,000 in Pledge Money! PACKET CONTENTS Every Day is a Race The Komen Story Team Timeline Team Registration Procedure Team Competition Sample Company Recruitment Letter Sample Employee Newsletter Release Help Us Win The Race For The Cure® Team Tailgate and Photo Reservation Form Honoring Survivors Race Day Information An Event with a Mission: To eradicate breast cancer as a life-threatening disease by advancing research, education, screening and treatment. Over 1 O0 teams participated last year in the largest race ever in the Inland Empire. Help us reach the goal of 150 teams this year.t Sunday, October 22, 2000 join thousands of dedicated runners, walkers, breast cancer survivors, team members and volunteers at Promenade Mall in Temecula for the Inland Empire's most exciting team event, the Komen Race for the Cure®. Every day in the Inland Empire a woman dies of breast cancer. Who hasn't been personally touched by this devastating disease? Start a Team to run or walk in memory of a loved one, or to celebrate a friend, wife, mother, sister or co-worker bravely battling breast cancer. Together, our numbers can change these numbers: · Breast cancer is the leading killer of women ages 35-54. · All women are at risk for breast cancer. The two most significant risk factors are being female and getting older. Only 5 to 10% of women with breast cancer have a hereditary form of the disease. · An average woman's chances of getting breast cancer are approximately one in 200 by age 40, one in 50 by age 50 and one in 25 by age 60. · In the United States an estimated 175,000 women and 1,300 men will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 43,700 women and 400 men will die from the disease this year. · The good news is, with continued advances in screening and treatment, breast cancer mortality has significantly dropped during this decade. The Komen Story In 1980, a beautiful mother of two named Susan Komen, died of breast cancer at age 36. Before Susan died, her sister, Nancy Brinker, promised Susan she wouM make it better for other women. In 1982, Nancy fulfilled her promise, establishing The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and Komen Race for the Cure®. The Race For The Cure® In just eighteen years, The Komen Foundation has raised more than $200 million, becoming one of the world's leading catalysts in the fight against breast cancer. The Komen Race for the Cure® has grown to 102 races, the largest series of 5K races in the world. Early Detection Saves Lives. Use Komen Sense. The Komen fotmdation recommends that all women practice monthly breast self-exams, have annual clinical exams, and beginning by age 40, a mammogram every year. For more breast health information, call the Komen Foundation's Toll Free Breast Care Helpline at 800-I'MAWARE. Susan Goodman Komen and sister, Nancy Goodman Brinker One out of seven women will be diagnosed with breast cancer during her lifetime RISK E VAL UA TION 1VIAMMOGRAPHY EYAM M ONTHL Y BREAST EXAM REGULAR September 6 August-October October 4-10 October 11 October 12 October 12 October 12 October 12 October 12 October 17 October 22 November 6 2000 TEAM TIMELINE "Kickoff Sports Party" for all Team Captains. Team Captain Training at Guidant, 26531 Ynez, Temecula, Reception 6:00-8:00 P.M. Recruit Team Members, raise pledges and create fundraising projects to win the "Most Money Raised" or "Largest Team" awards. Collect Team Race entry forms and pledge monies from your Team members. Check to see they are signed and complete. Use the Team Captain Reconciliation Worksheet. All entries must be postmarked. All Team entries received. (No Saturday deliveries) Team Walk-ln Registration at INLAND VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 36450 Inland Valley Drive, Suite 103, CA 92595. Time: Noon - 6:00 P.M. Final US Express/Overnight Mail Deadline. Komen Inland Race For The Cure®, P.O. Box 828, Rialto, CA 92377. Team Tailgate Reservation form and check due. (Complimentary Tailgate for all Presenting and Diamond Sponsors.) Team photo reservation form and check due. Appointment required. Complimentary Photo for all sponsors, $25 fee for all others. Team bib numbers and T-shin pick up at INLAND VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, 36450 Inland Valley Drive, Suite 103, Wildomar, CA 92595 Time: Noon - 6:00 P.M. RACE DAY!! 2000 Inland Empire Race For The Cure®. Avoid the rush and enjoy the Expo. Arrive at least one hour before your Race start time. Ample parking and shuttles provided. All pledge money due to be eligible for team credit and pledge prizes. Mail to: Komen Inland Empire Race For The Cure®, C/O Race Central, P.O. Box 828, Rialto, CA 92377. TEAM COMPETITION Team Rules All teams must include a minimum of five team members under one team name and one team number. Team Divisions Largest Teams THINK BIG! All Teams will automatically be entered in the largest team competition. A commemorative plaque will be awarded to the largest 2000 team. Most Money Raised The "Perpetual Trophy" will be awarded to the team that raises the most pledge donations (entry fees are not included in the total.) Special awards will also be given to teams raising the most pledge donations in the following: 5-49 Team Members 50-99 Team Members 100 or more Team Members Team Competition Support an employee or co-worker battling breast cancer with a Team for the Cure. Corporate benefit for a Team for the Cure: Corporate Pride and Teambuilding · Honor or ramember an employee who has battled breast cancer · Managers and staff working together for a common goal · Team tailgate at Race for the Cure® promotes social gathering · Team photo on race day as a memento · Rewarding volunteer opportunities · Special opportunity for family and associates involvement Positive Corporate Image · More than making money, making a difference · Your corporate team t-shirt provides visibility Raising Employee Awareness of Breast Cancer · Breast health literature and speaker's bureau available as resource for employees · Show corporate concern Starting a Team for the Cure: Recruiting Members · Start at the top, get buy in from management · Matching gifts · Each One, Reach One Each participant reaches out to a friend and encourages him/her to join the team · Use intemal company communications, global e-mails, posters, lighted message board displays, corporate newsletter, online registration · Host an internal kick-off event Make it fun! · Name your team · Invite friends, family and business associates to join your team · Design your own corporate t-shirts. Everyone will want one! · Compete for raising the most pledge donations · Hold intemal fund raisers HONORING SURVIVORS ....... :::'!"~'i-'~.~';~7.-':<:;!::-~'?L=. ,.---.-: ~Survivor Awards :i ~i?~ ' ~_-= ~ ~ C' t" ~.,~e Home Depot ~vites all breast cancer s~ivors ~d thek guests to stop - by the S~ivor Hospkali~ tent located h the Expo on Race day. Celebrate a Su~ivor Susan's Garden Tribute to Breast Cancer Survivors This year all breast cancer survivors are invited to participate for a reduced entry fee of $15.00. All Survivors and their supporters are invited to a special recognition ceremony on the stage area at approximately 10:30 a.m. on race day. Breast cancer survivors who wish to be recognized may pick up their complimentary pink t-shirt, cap and button from the Kellogg Company and Zeta Tau Alpha Survivor Booth in the Expo or at the registration area on Race day. We invite participants to recognize those special people who have been touched by breast cancer. "In memory of' and "in celebration of" pink placards will be available at Team Packet pick-up and the day of the Race at the registration area. The Breast Cancer Survivor Recognition Program is co-sponsored by the Kellogg Company and Zeta Tau Alpha. Honor the memory of a loved one or celebrate a survivor with your personal message. A limited number of keepsake pink ribbon placards will be hung along the course for a donation of $50. To order, please call (909) 677-9781 by October 12, 2000. RACE DAY INFORMATION The event starts and finishes at the Promenade Mall in Temecula, comer of Ynez and Winchester Road (take Winchester exit east from 1-15). Arrive at least one hour before your scheduled start time to allow for parking and locating start area. Ample parking is available in the Promenade Shopping Area. THE PROMENADI HALL INLAND EMPIRE 5K & I MILE RUN/WALK Sunday, Oct. 22, 2000 The Promenade r"1a11 Day of Event Schedule Sunday, October 22, 2000 6:30 a.m. 6:30 -11:00a.m. 7:30a.m. 7:45a.m. 8:00a.m. 9:00a.m. 10:30a.m. 10:50a.m. Length of Race Registration Health, Fitness & Guidant Kid's Expo Family 1-Mile Fun Run/Walk Aerobic Warm-Up Women's 5K Run/Walk Cooed 5K Run/Walk Breast Cancer Survivor Tribute & Photo Session (at main stage) Pledge Prize Drawing 5K (3.1) Women's Run/Walk 5K Co-ed Run/Walk 1 Mile Fun Run/Walk Local Presenting Platinum THE PaESS-ENTERPRBE The Inland Empire's ZVewspaper THE PROMENADE THE INLAND EMPIRE'S BUSINESS NEWSPAPER THE BUSINESS Puss In Temecula ~, 6barter COMMUNICATIONS INLAND VALLEY Diamond PACIFICDBELL Wireless FOUNI~"~I[I]N Hemato]ogy Oncology Consultants Kishore Sehgal, M.D., Stanley D. Schinke, M.D.[ I Rancho Springs &Evelyn F. Mendoza, M.D. Medical Center Tenet HealthSystem BRONZE TEMECULA VALLEY BANK PLANT EQUIPMENT, INC. TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS CITY OF TEMECULA CITY OF MURRIETA KATY RADIO MILGARD WINDOWS CHEVRGN BURGESS MOVING & STORAGE FORD CREDIT INLAND EMPIRE FAMILY MAGAZINE SIERRA PACIFIC HIGHGROVE RESTAURANTS E [ a.. ,-: mOn ~0 'd 'ON X~H Ng 6~:011HH O0-90-dHS ~0 'd 'ON XVH WY 6~:0~ I~9 O0-BO-dBS tD t~l E ~0 'd 'ON XVJ WY O0:It IHJ O0-80-d]S' ATTACHMENT C - ESTIMATED CITY SUPPORT COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received at the Inland Empire Race For The Cure organizational committee meeting on September 6, 2000 and cost projections for the Inland Empire Race For The Cure. the following expenses can be anticipated for this event: Police: $2,375.65 Fire: $ 290.00 Public Works: $3,606.60 Code Enforcement: $ 591.36 TOTAL: $6,863.61 ATTACHMENT D- SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE INLAND EMPIRE AFFILIATE OF THE SUSAN G. KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION This Agreement, made this 26th day of September 2000, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and THE INLAND EMPIRE AFFILIATE OF THE SUSAN G. KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION, a Califomia nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "IESGKF"). A. IESGKF will operate the "Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Race For The Cure" on October 22, 2000. The Race For The Cure is a special event located at The Promenade Mall in Temecula, comer of Ynez and Winchester Road. The event includes Women's and Coed 5K Run/Walks, a family One-Mile Fun Run/Walk, live entertainment, exhibits, a Guidant Kids' Expo, a health and fitness expo, refreshments and pdze drawings. Las years attendance was approximately 7,000 people. The attendance for this years event is estimated between 10,000 - 12,000 attendees. B. The City of Temecula desires to be a Bronze Sponsor of the 2000 Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Race For The Cure. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. In exchange for providing for the Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Race For The Cure of approximately $7,835.48 for all dty-support costs of Public Works, Fire and Police, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a "Bronze Sponsor' of the 2000 Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Race For The Cure. In exchange for being a Bronze Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as listed in Attachment A. B. Within 60 days following the Inland Empire Race For The Cure, IESGKF shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a wdtten report evaluating the Race For The Cure, its attendance, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a Bronze Sponsor. The report should also include samples of media press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format. C. The IESGKF shall file Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications with the City of Temecula no later than 90 days preceding the day of the Race For The Cure event. D. IESGKF agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or by reason of IESGKF's acts or omissions or those of IESGKF's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Inland Empire Race For The Cure to the maximum extent allowed by law. E. IESGKF shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with IESGKF and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City (refer to Attachment D). Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Inland Empire Race For The Cure. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with Inland Empire Race For The Cure. 3. Provide the following minimum limits: (A) General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Inland Empire Race For The Cure. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or IESGKF shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. F. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attomey's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the par~ies hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. DATED: THEINLAND EMPIRE AFFILIATE OF THE SUSAN G. KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Joan Sparkman, President of the Inland Empire Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS The City of Temecula's benefits as a Bronze Sponsor of The Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Race For The Cure: · City logo/or name will appear on flyers, advertisements, and program relating to the event. · Due to the timing of producing posters and promotional items, Temecula's name/iogo will not be able to be displayed this year. To compensate for this loss of recognition, The City logo/or name will appear on posters and promotional items relating to the 2001 event. · Free booth space at event · City banner displayed · City name on all press releases · City of Temecula advertisement in the official program ITEM 4 APPROVAL C~. CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City ManagedCity Council /'~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 12, 2000 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 29036, Finding of conformance with its original approval, Located on the south side Via La Vida between Margarita Road and Solana Way ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public PREPARED BY: ~'/ff~,eza James, Assistant Engineer Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 29036 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: On November 9, 1999, the City of Temecula City Council approved Planning Application No. PA96-0447 (Tentative Tract Map), a request to subdivide 6.31 acres of land into twenty four (24) residential lots; and PA99-0238 (Development Agreement), a request for a development agreement to allow a minimum five (5) foot setback for a 28 lot subdivision. Final Tract Map No. 29036 is a twenty-four (24) lot single-family residential subdivision. The tract is located on the south side Via La Vida between Margarita Road and Solana Way. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies, with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No.29036: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Tract Map No. 29036 1 r:\agdrpt~2000\0926\tr29036.map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TM 29036 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Flood Control (ADP) Quimby Fees Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Paid Paid To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit 2 r:\agdrpt~000\0926\tr29036.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO.29036 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 219,500 Water $ Sewer $ 48,000 TOTAL $ 267,500 Monument $ 4250 DATE: September 26, 2000 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY $ 110,000 $ $ 24,000 $ 134,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00 Paid 125.00 8.00 1,230.00 250.00 1,613.00 0.00 * To be determined 3 r:~agdrpt~2000\O926\tr29036.map Vicinity Map Tract 29036 --TR. 29036 VICINITY MAP o\~ ITEM 5 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~)y~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 26, 2000 Parcel Map No. 29407, Finding Of Conformance With Its Original Approval, Located On Commerce Center Drive ' Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works PREPARED BY: F/~(~erald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 29407 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreements, BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 29407, a one (1) parcel -fifteen (15) units- industrial condominium subdivision on 6.02 acres, was approved on May 18, 2000, by the City of Temecula Planning Director. All public improvements are in place and no agreements/bonds other then monumentation agreement and bond are required. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This parcel map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. Parcel Map No. 29407 is a one (1) parcel -fifteen (15) unit- industrial condominium subdivision on 6.02 acres. The parcel is located on Commerce Center Drive. The underlying Development Plan PA 98-0347 was approved by the City Council on February 23, 1999 and the site is now developed. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 29407 I r:~agdrpt~000\0926~m29407.map II CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PM 29407 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee Area Drainage Plan Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Paid Paid 2 r:~agdrpt~000\0926\pm29407.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 29407 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY DATE: September 26, 2000 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Water $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Sewer $ 0.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Monument $ 3,100.00 DEVELOPMENT FEES The developer paid the following fees when the underlying Development Plan PA98-0347 was being developed/constructed. RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due $ 14,639.49 $ 56,664.72 $ 70.00 $ 4.00 $ 1,070.00 $ 250.00 $ 1,394.00 $ 0.00 3 r:~agdrpt~000\0926\pm29407.map SITE c~o NO SC~_E 3A1~0 ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council APPROVAL~' CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER t'~A/William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 26, 2000 Conveyance of Right-of-Way Easement to the City of Temecula PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the conveyance of a Right-of-Way Easement on Sixth Street for public street and roadway purposes, including public utility and service facilities. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to record the document. BACKGROUND: In December 1997, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) purchased a .19-acre parcel on Sixth Street for the development of affordable housing. The RDA subsequently divided the parcel and conveyed this property to Habitat for Humanity, a non- profit housing organization, to develop the site. Using volunteer labor and other donations, Habitat for Humanity recently completed the construction of two single-family residences at this location, which have been sold and are now occupied by the selected families. However, as part of the final escrow instructions prior to the actual transfer of these properties to the individual property owners, it was necessary for the City to obtain a perpetual right-of-way easement for ninety-three square feet of property within Parcel B for public street and roadway purposes, including public utility and service facilities. The right-of-way easement area is located within that portion of the roadway improvements that will soon be under construction at Felix Valdez and Sixth Street. As a result, the new property owner of Parcel B has conveyed this easement to the City, a copy of which is attached for your review. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The acceptance of the aforementioned right-of-way area merely conveys a perpetual easement to the City for public street and roadway purposes. ATTACHMENTS: Right-of-Way Easement Document R:\agdrpt\00\0926\habitatforhumanity,roweasement 1 Recording requested by and when Recorded, mail to: City Clerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Exempt from Recording Fee per Govt. Code Sec. 27383 City of Temecula (Space above this line for Recorders use) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE. Public Agency exempt. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922 RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ROSALINA GONZALES AN UNMARRIED WOMAN ("Grantor") hereby grant(s) and convey(s) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, ("Grantee") a perpetual easement and right of way for public street and roadway purposes, including public utility and public service facilities over, under, upon, and across, and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached All as illustrated on the plat attach ~r/~'eto and ma ed Exhib~ "B" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this day o~z..Z,z~-" ,2000. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of/~/~/--~__-/_J:c~,~,j/ )ss. ROS~INA GONZALE~erSOnally know to me or proved to me On the basis of satisfacto~ evidence to be the person whose name J subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/hers/their signature on this instrument the persons or entity upon which the person(s) act, executed the instrument. R:~/asinobl~habitatforhumanity,rowdedication CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS, LAND DEVELOPMENT DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EXHIBIT "A" That portion of the following described parcel: The northeasterly half of the northeasterly 120 feet of the southwesterly 240 feet of the northwesterly 70 feet, also known as Parcel "B" described in Exhibit "B" of a Certificate of Compliance, PA99-0246, recorded 10/20/1999 as instrument number 461757 of official records of Riverside County, described as follows: The northwesterly half of that tract of land formerly used as a railroad right of way and station grounds of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company, conveyed to N.R. Vail, et. al., by deed recorded June 11, 1940 in Book 464 Page 505 of official records of Riverside County, California, said property being described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of Lot 1, Block 27, as shown by Map of the Town of Temecula on file in Book 15 Page 726 of maps, records of San Diego County, California; Thence southwesterly in a straight line to the most easterly corner of Lot 1, Block 36, as shown by said map; Thence northwesterly in a straight line to the most northerly corner of Lot 1 O, Block 37, as shown by said map; Thence northeasterly in a straight line to the most westerly corner of Lot 22, Block 25, as shown by said map; Thence southeasterly in a straight line to the point of beginning; excepting therefrom those portions included in River and Pujol Streets, as shown on said map. For street right of way and public utility purposes described as follows: Commencing at the centerline intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street; Thence N44°29'59"E, 30 feet along the centerline of Sixth Street; Thence S45°30'01 "E, 30 feet to the east right-of-way of Sixth Street; Thence N44°29'59"E, 240.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning, being the northwesterly corner of said Parcel "B" and east right-of-way of Sixth Street, described in Exhibit "B" of said Certificate of Compliance; Thence S45°30'01 "E, 5.72 feet, along the northeasterly line of said Parcel "B"; Thence S54°44'11 'W, 23.21 feet to the beginning of a curve, concave southeasterly; having a radial bearing of N35°15'49"W; Thence 17.87 feet southwesterly along the said curve having a central angle of R: ~JIMENECIOOIMEMOSIHABITA TFORHUMANITYRWDEDICA TION. DOC 8/22,/00 10°14'12" and a radius of 100.00 feet; Thence N44°29'59"E, 40.61 feet, along the east right-of-way of Sixth Street, to the True Point of Beginning. Coataining .0021 acres or 93.0027 square feet. R:iJIMENEC OOIMEMOSIH,481TATFORHUMANITYRWDEDICATION. DOC 8/22/0O CITY OF TEMECULA Office of the City Clerk 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyer by the attached Riqht of Way Easement document was approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula and accepted by order of the Temecula City Council made on , 2000, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeffrey E, Stone, Mayor ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R:/yasjnobk/habitatforhurnanity.rowdedication EXHIBIT "B" PUJOL STREET N45'30'01'V (,~ 30' DATE,10/:~0/99 PARCEL C.D.C. PA99-0246 DATE,IO/20/ INSTRII1999-461757 PRDPD.~ED SEE DETAIL "A" FUTURE R/V \ DEDICATION L3 SCALE 1'=50' SOURCES OF REFERENCE: CERTIFICATE OF COHPUANCE, PA99-OZ&b RECORDED ON 10/Z0/ggASINSTRUHENT NO. 19~9-&bl757 IN OFFiCIALRECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, RECORD OF SURVEY, RECORDED ON Z/&/75 IN BOOK b0 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 71 OF OFFICIAL RECORD~ OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. L =17.87' T =8.96' S45°30'01'E 5,72' DETAIL "A" N.T,S. FELIX VALnEZ N45'30'lS'V -XISTINGR/V J. PARKS No, 19744 , CIVIL · REVISIONS DA'I~ INIT. PREPARE) BY: C. JIHEk~:Z APPROVED DATE R ALDJ, P DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS R.C.F_ NO. 19744 EXP. 9-30-01 CITY OF TE1VIECULA EXHIBIT FOR RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ON SIXTH STREET ococt/td/h~bltat/hobltot.c:o7 ITEM 7 ORDINANCE NO. 2000-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.16 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO JUVENILE LOITERING AND PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR JUVENILES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 9.16, Juvenile Loitering, is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 9.16, JUVENILE LOITERING 9.16.010 9.16.020 9.16.030 9.16.040 9.16.050 9.16.060 9, 16,070 9.16.080 9.16.90 9.16.91 Purpose and Intent Daylight Loitering Restrictions Exceptions Enforcement Violation Penalties for Minors Hearing Requirement Penalties for Parents or Guardians Definitions "9.16.010 Purpose and Intent The Council finds, determines and declares that this Chapter has been enacted based upon the following facts and purposes: A School absenteeism is a problem that plagues our schools and creates a burden for all communities throughout the City. B Students who are absent from school without a valid excuse are denied an education. C The unexcused absences of students from school result in the loss of State and Federal funding to the detriment of all students. D Unsupervised students involve themselves in unsafe activities by loitering in residential neighborhoods, business districts and malls. E Unsupervised students engage in criminal activity to the detriment of the community such as residential burglaries, auto thefts, bicycle thefts, vandalism and other visible signs of disorder. F Unsupervised students become a burden on police who must return them to school, wait for parents to pick them up, and investigate any and all criminal activity related to a studenrs absenteeism. R:Ords 2000-10 I G The City of Temecula has a compelling interest in protecting the public from juveniles committing crimes, increasing the exercise of parental responsibility for the City's children, in reducing the opportunities for juvenile crime, and in improving school attendance. Over the past five years the City of Temecula has experienced a direct correlation between school attendance and daytime juvenile crime. When school attendance increases, daytime juvenile crime decreases. Conversely, a drop in school attendance correlates to an increase in juvenile crime during school hours. H It is, therefore, the intent of the City Council in enacting this Chapter to prohibit any minor under the age of 18, who is subject to compulsory education or compulsory continuation education, subject to specific exceptions related herein, from loitering in or upon the public streets, highways, roads, alleys, parks, playgrounds, or other public grounds between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. on days when said student's school is in session, subject to the exceptions and terms of this Chapter. It is further the intent of the City Council to provide appropriate criminal sanctions against any minor or parent or guardian who violates this ordinance by making a violation of this ordinance an infraction. It is the intent of the City Council to allow minors under the age of eighteen (18) to move about freely while participating in legitimate activities, and to pursue legitimate activities during the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. with the permission of his or her parent, guardian, or other adult person having the lawful care and custody of the minor. "9.16.020 Daylight Loitering Restrictions A It is unlawful for any minor under the age of eighteen years, who is subject to compulsory education or to compulsory continuation education, alone or in concert with others, to be in or upon the public streets, highways, roads, alleys, parks, playgrounds, parking areas, or other public grounds, public places or amusement and eating places, vacant lots or other unsupervised places or any place open to the public, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. on days when said minor's school is in session. This provision shall also apply to minors whose enrollment status is that of suspension, expulsion, or transfers in progress. B It is unlawful for a parent or guardian of a minor who is subject to the penalties set forth in this Chapter to knowingly permit or allow a minor to be in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. "9.16.030 Exceptions Neither the minor nor the parents or guardians of the minor shall be liable under Section 9.16.020 if one or more of the following circumstances exist: A The minor is accompanied by his or her parent or legal guardian; B The minor is involved in an emergency; R:Ords 2000-10 2 C The minor is going directly to or coming directly from the minor's place of gainful employment with a valid school work permit; D The minor is going to or from a medical appointment for the minor or for the minor's parent or guardian and can show proof of that appointment; E The minor is off campus for lunch and has in his/her possession a valid, school- issued off campus permit; and has conformed to all the conditions and restrictions of the lunch pass; F The minor is directly going to or from a school sponsored event or activity such as a sporting event, field trip, or other such school activity; G The minor is emancipated pursuant to law; H The minor is authorized to be absent from his or her school pursuant to the provisions of California Education Code Section 48205, or any other applicable State or Federal law; The minor is receiving instruction by a qualified tutor pursuant to California Education Code section 48224, or is receiving home or private school instruction pursuant to California Education Code Section 48222. "9.16.040 Enforcement Before taking any enforcement action under this section a police officer shall ask the minor's age and reason for being in the public place or other location covered under this section during the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. of the same day on days when said minor's school is in session. The officer shall not issue a citation or make an arrest under this section unless the officer reasonably believes that an offense has occurred and that, based on any responses and other circumstances, no defense under this section is applicable. "9.16.050 Violation Each violation of any of the provisions set forth herein shall constitute a separate offense and shall be classified as an infraction. "9.16.060 Penalties for Minors Any minor violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be punished as follows: A First-Offense Infraction: The initial violation of this section shall be deemed to be an infraction and upon a sustained finding thereon shall be punished by a fine to be determined by the court not to exceed $100.00 and/or any other penalty provided by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 258. B Second-Offense Infraction: The second violation of this section within the same year shall be deemed to be an infraction and upon a sustained finding thereof shall be punished by a fine to be determined by the court not to exceed $150.00 and/or any other penalty provided by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 258. R:Ords 2000-10 3 C Third-or Subsequent-Offense Infraction: The third or subsequent violation of this section occurring within the same year shall be deemed to be an infraction and upon a sustained finding thereof shall be punished by a fine to be determined by the court not to exceed $250.00 and/or any other penalty provided by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 258. D The court may set aside the penalties set forth herain if the minor produces proof satisfactory to the court that the following has occurred: fi) The minor has had no unexcused absences from school from the date of citation; and (2) The minor has performed twenty (20) hours of court-approved community service during times other than the minor's hours of school attendance; and (3) The minor's parant or guardian has attended a parenting class or a series of parenting classes approved by the court, and (4) "9.16.070 The minor and parant or guardian have attended counseling as diracted and approved by the court. Hearing Requirement A minor cited for a violation of this ordinance must attend a court hearing on the violation and must be accompanied at the hearing by his/her parent or guardian. If any such parent or guardian fails to attend the hearing with the minor, and unless the interests of justice would otherwise be served, the court shall continue the hearing and shall issue a citation to said parental or custodial person diracting that person to appear at the continued hearing with the minor (pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 661 .) "9.16.080 Penalties for Parents or Guardians The punishment for each violation of this ordinance shall be as follows: A First-Offense Infraction: The initial violation of this section shall be deemed to be an infraction and upon conviction theraof shall be punished by a fine to be determined by the court not to exceed $100.00. B Second-Offense Infraction: The second violation of this section occurring within the same year shall be deemed to be an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine to be determined by the court not to exceed $150.00. C Third-or Subsequent-Offense Infraction: The third or subsequent violation of this section occurring within the same year shall be deemed to be an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine to be determined by the court not to exceed $250.00. R:Ords 2000-10 4 /I D The court may set aside the penalties set forth herein if the parent or guardian produces proof satisfactory to the court that the following has occurred: (1) The minor has had no unexcused absences from the school from the date of citation; and (2) The parent or guardian has performed twenty (20) hours of court- approved community service; and (3) The parent or guardian has attended a parenting class or a series of parenting classes approved by the court; and (4) "9.16.090 The minor and parent or guardian have artended counseling as directed and approved by the court. Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter, the following words shall be defined as follows: A. Emergency: An unforeseen combination of circumstances or the resulting state that calls for immediate action. The term includes, but is not limited to the following: a fire, a natural disaster, an automobile accident, or any situation requiring immediate action to prevent serious bodily injury, hardship or loss of life. B. Guardian: (a) A person who under court order, is the guardian of the person of a minor; or (b) A public or private agency with whom the minor has been placed by court order; or (c) A person at least (18) years of age exercising care and custody of the minor and having written authorization to do so. C. Minor: Any person between the ages of 6 and 18 years of age. D. Parent: Any person who is a natural parent, adopting parent, or stepparent of a minor. E. Public Place: Any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access including, but not limited to, streets, highways, beaches, parks, playgrounds, and common areas of schools, hospitals, apartment houses, office buildings, transport facilities, theaters, game rooms, shops, shopping malls, or any other public place of business. R:Ords 2000-10 5 F. Street: A way or place, of whatever nature, open to the use of the public as a matter of right for the purpose of vehicular travel or in the case of a sidewalk thereof for pedestrian travel. The term "street" includes the legal right-of-way, including but not limited to the traffic lanes, curbs, sidewalk, whether paved or unpaved, and any grass plots or other grounds found within the legal right-of-way of a street. The term "street" applies irrespective of what the legal right-of-way is formally named or called, whether alley, avenue, court, road or otherwise. Section 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2000-10 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 12 day September, 2000, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of September, 2000 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:Ords 2000-10 6 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT II ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AUGUST 8, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:41 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Comerchero presiding. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Nagger, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, and Comerchero ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 27, July 11, and July 18, 2000. 2 Second Amendment to the HVAC Preventive Maintenance AClreement with Kinetics Service Company for FY2000-01 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Second Amendment with Kinetics Service Company for additional HVAC repair and extra work services in the amount of $19,870. (This agenda item was removed from the Community Services District Agenda and placed under City Council Consent Calendar; see Item 8A.) 3 Completion and Acceptance for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossin.q - Project No. PW97-25CSD RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Accept the project Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing - Project No. PW97-25CSD as complete; 3.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Minutes.csd\080800 1 3.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 3 (Item No. 2 was discussed under City Council Consent Calendar), The motion was seconded by Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 Water Park Subcommittee RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Appoint two members of the Board to serve on a Water Park Development Subcommittee. For Ms. May Lorah, Monte de Oro Road, President Comerchero advised that the established Subcommittee, comprised of two City Councilmembers, along with the consultant would determine the feasibility of a water park, noting that the consultant study had previously been approved and that the Subcommittee would be making a recommendation to the City Council as to the feasibility. Voicing no objection to the City building a water park, Ms. Lorah expressed concern with the City expending money toward a joint or private enterprise to which President Comerchero advised that all those options (mechanics for building and operating) will be considered by the Subcommittee. MOTION: Director Stone moved to appoint Directors Comerchero and Naggar to the Water Park Subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Director Roberrs and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No comment. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT No comment. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS NO comments. Minutes.csd~080800 2 ADJOURNMENT At 7:45 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 22, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President A'I'I'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd\080800 3 ITEM 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids for Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting, Project No. PW00-19CSD Brian Gulllot, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the project plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the construction of Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting, Project No. PW00-19CSD. BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors approved the installation of sports lighting at the Rancho California Sports Park in the Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program. The project will expand the amount of recreational facilities available for night use and reduce the glare of the existing lights to the nearby residential areas. This project has undergone an environmental review process and it has been found that it is "Categorically Exempt" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301. Categorically exempt projects do not require public noticing. However, due to the close proximity of the park to homes, notices were posted and sent to all property owners within visual distance of the fields and a public meeting was held. No comments were received. The Public Works Department, Capital Improvement Division, has prepared plans, specifications, and contract documents, and the project is now ready to be advertised for construction bids. The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $433,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting project is funded through Development Impact Fees - Parks and Recreation, Reimbursement (Lennar Donation) and Reimbursement (McMillin Contribution). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description R:~AGDRPT~.0~I0926',PW00*19CSD, BJDdoc ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~F'.(Z~. September 26, 2000 Authorization to Release a Formal Bid for the Desiltation Pond Project PREPARED BY: ~3~,~"~Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Desiltation Pond Project. DISCUSSION: In October 1999, the Community Services District awarded a design contract with the Armstrong Development Services to complete the construction documents for the Desiltation Pond Project. The construction documents are complete and the project wiII be ready to bid. Staff has also obtained permits from Fish and Game and Army Corps of Engineers to complete the work as described in the plans and specifications. Staff will ensure compliance with the conditions of the permits. It is envisioned that the project will provide for the removal of approximately 10,000 cubic yards of silt and dirt which have filled in the eastern shoreline over the last few years. The work will also include the removal of native vegetation to allow access to the site. The disturbance will be mitigated on a one-for-one basis in accordance with Fish and Game and Army Corps of Engineers permits for this project. Finally, the project will remove and replace some damaged fencing around the area of work. The project is estimated to take 60-75 days to complete once work is commenced. FISCAL IMPACT: The Engineers cost estimate for this project is $120,000. The project is funded with Capital Reserves and included in the Capital Improvement Program in fund 210-190- 171-5804. r:XcXagendas\adabld.cc ITEM 4 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT General Manager/Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services September 26, 2000 Tract 29036- Service Level B, and Service Level D Rates and Charges (Located on the Southeast side of Via La Vida.) PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 29036 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, and refuse collection services to numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through Service Level "B", and Service Level "D". The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. Tract No. 29036 is a future 24 lot residential development. The development consists of approximately 6.3 acres of vacant property located on the southeast side of Via La Vida, south of Solana Way. The property owner has requested that the TCSD establish the future parcel charges necessary to provide ongoing revenue for residential street lighting, and refuse collection services within this development. R:\smithb\Elec0ons\29036-Staff-Notice of Hearing.doe 09/18/2000 Beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the following TCSD rates and charges are proposed for residential street lighting, and refuse collection services within Tract No. 29036: Service Level B 25.68 per residential parcel Service Level D 9172.56 per occupied parcel Pursuant to the provisions of Proposition 218, the TCSD is required to hold a public hearing and obtain voter or property owner approval in order to establish certain new rates and charges. In addition, a report must be prepared and filed with the Secretary/City Clerk which identifies all of the affected parcels and the amount of the proposed rates and charges. A notice is mailed to the property owner identifying the proposed rates and charges and date of the Public Hearing. The Public Hearing is held at least 45 days after the mailing of the notices. If the proposed rates and charges are not rejected pursuant to a written protest, then the TCSD will conduct a mailed ballot proceeding not less than 45 days after the public hearing. The proposed rates and charges for Service Level B cannot be imposed unless the property owner has approved the new charges. In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners shall receive notice of the proposed charges for Service Level D, however, mailed ballot proceedings are not required to impose rates and charges for refuse collection services. All the perimeter landscaping and slopes, in this development, do not meet the TCSD standard requirements for acceptance into the City's maintenance areas. All perimeter landscaping and slopes will be maintained, as per the development's CC&R's and the City's Conditions of Approval, Therefore, we will not need to notice or hold an election for Service Level C, Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed residential street lighting and refuse collection services rates and charges for Tract No. 29036 beginning in Fiscal Year 2001-2002 and schedule a public hearing concerning this issue for November 14, 2000. Staff will then proceed with noticing the owner(s) of Tract No. 29036 regarding the proposed rates and charges and the public hearing date. If there is no majority protest against the rates and charges on November 14, 2000 staff will then proceed with the mailed ballot process for Service Level B. FISCAL IMPACT: If voter approved, upon buildout of the development, the proposed rates and charges of 925.68 per parcel will generate an annual levy of 9616.32, for the Service Level B. The proposed Service Level D charge of 9172.56 per parcel will generate an annual levy of 94,141.44. (Pursuant to Proposition 218, this amount may be increased by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 after conducting an additional public hearing. However, mailed ballot proceedings are not required to increase Service Level D rates and charges.) Actual costs for providing long-term residential street lighting within Tract No. 29036 will be absorbed into Service Level B upon installation of said improvements. The owner of Tract No. 29036 has paid the administrative and mailing costs associated with the public notices and ballot information required per Proposition 218. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Resolution of Intention R:\smithb\Elections\29036-Staff-Notice of Hearing.doe 09/20/2000 Project Site RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 29036 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"), to provide specified services to propcries within its jurisdiction. Section 2. The TCSD provides long-term residential street lighting, and refuse collection services in numerous residential developments within the City of Temecula. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B), and refuse collection (Service Level D) services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. Section 3. The TCSD hereby initiates proceedings to provide residential street lighting, and refuse collection services within Tract No. 29036 beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD has caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of the real property and the proposed amount of the Service Level B, and Service Level D rates and charges required for residential street lighting, and refuse collection services provided to each parcel within Tract No. 29036 beginning fiscal year 2001-2002. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall be applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charges are levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or ifa lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes R:\smithb\Elections\29036 Resolution of intention,doe 09/18/2000 appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and appoints the day of November 14, 2000 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590, as the time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed Service Level B, and Service Level D rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from time to time. Section 5. The Secretary of the TCSD is hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the Report and of the time and place of hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 61765.2 and Section 6 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution. Section 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPRO VED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 261h day of September 2000. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, President Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/District Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on 26TM day of September, 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS BOARD MEMBERS BOARD MEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary R:\smithb\Elections\29036 Resolution of Intention.doe 09/18/2000 CITY OF TEMECULA TRACT NO. 29036 INITIAL LEVY REPORT Service Levels B, and D Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Commencing Fiscal Year 2001/2002 INTENT MEETING: PUBLIC HEARING: September 26, 2000 November 14, 2000 INTRODUCTION: Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD'') to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the TCSD is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the TCSD. The TCSD collects property-related fees and charges ("Charges") in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the TCSD. The TCSD was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the Califomia Govermnent Code, CCSD Law"). Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the TCSD, any changes to the TCSD and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service properties within the TCSD. The services provided by the TCSD and the corresponding costs are bodgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel. The TCSD provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection in numerous residential developments, and road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the TCSD. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance (Service Level R) services furnished by the TCSD, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Initial Levy Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B and Service Level D Rates and Charges for the parcels and territory identified as Tract No. 29036 beginning in FY 2001-2002. The territory and properties identified and described in this Report includes all parcels within Tract 29036, a future residential development that consists of 6.31 acres of vacant property located on the southeast side of Via La Vida, with 24 planned residential units. The owner of record (sole property owner) has requested that the TCSD establish the parcel charges necessary to provide ongoing revenue for residential street lighting, and refuse collection services within this future residential development. Pursuant to Article XIIID of the Califomia Constitution ("Proposition 218") and CSD Law, the TCSD is required to hold a protest hearing (the "Public Hearing") and a ballot proceeding in order to establish certain new rates and charges. In addition, a report must be prepared and filed with the District Secretary/City Clerk that identifies all of the affected parcels and the amount of the proposed rates and charges. A notice is mailed to the property owner identifying the proposed rates and charges and the date of the Public Hearing. The Public Hearing is held at least 45 days after the mailing of the notices. If the proposed rates and charges are not rejected pursuant to a majority written protest, then the CSD will conduct a mailed ballot proceeding not less than 45 days after the Public Hearing. The proposed rates and charges for Service Level B cannot be imposed unless the property owner has approved the new charges. Ballot proceedings are not required to impose rates and charges for refuse collection services (Service Level D). PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS A. General Description of TCSD Services The TCSD provides certain property related services consisting of four (4) separate Service Levels to parcels throughout the TCSD. Each parcel within the TCSD is charged for the proportional cost of the services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Residential Street Lighting · Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance (Not applicable to this Development) · Refuse Collection · Road Improvement and Maintenance (Not applicable to this Development) TRACT 29036 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The property (Tract No. 29036) is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, City of Temecula, and is described as follows: Pamel A: Parcel 1 and 4 and Lots A, E and F, of Parcel Map No. 13784, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per recorded in Book 78, page(s) 50, of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Parcel B: Parcel 2 and Lots B and C of Parcel Map 13784, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 78, page(s) 50, of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Together with those portions of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 of Tract No. 20882-3, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, as per map recorded in Book 185, Pages 1 through 7 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as provided in Lot Line Adjustment recorded November 18, 1988, as Instrument No. 338697, of Official Records, described as follows: Beginning at the most Northerly comer of said Parcel 2, said comer being a point on the center line of Via La Vida, shown on said Tract Map No. 20882-3, a radial line to said point bears South 71 ° 12' 28" East; Thence South 24° 00' 43" East, 46.01 feet to a point on the Southeasterly line of Via La Vida as shown on said Tract Map No. 20882-3, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave Northerly having a radius of 333.00 feet a radial line to said point bears South 65° 21' 23" East, said point also being the true point of beginning; Thence Northeasterly 30.13 feet along said curve and said Southeasterly line of Via La Vida through a central angle of 5° 11' 02"; Thence leaving Southeasterly line of Via La Vida South 24° 50' 49" East, 315.59 Thence South 31° 48' 00" West, 31.78 feet; Thence North 24° 99' 4Y' East, 312.50 feet (312.51 feet per said Tract No. 20882-3 to the True Point of Beginning. Parcel C: Parcel 3 aud Lot D of Parcel Map 13784, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, as per map recorded in Book 78, page(s) 50, of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Together with those portions of Lots 20, 26, 27 and 28 of Tract No 20882-3, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 185, pages 1 through 7 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as provided in Lot Line Adjustment recorded November 18, 1988, as Instrument No. 333698, of Official Records, described as follo~vs: Beginning at the most Easterly comer of said Parcel 3; Thence Northerly along the Easterly line of Parcel 2 of said Parcel Map No 13784, North 24" 00' 43" West, 20.98 feet; Thence leaving said Easterly line North 31° 48' 00" East, 31.78 feet Thence South 24{' 50' 49" East, 48.85 feet; Thence South 34° 22' 37" East, 34.42 feet; Thence South 39° 59' 04" West, 62.47 feet; Thence South 33° 57' 35" West, 46.78 feet; Thence South 48° 00' 17" West, 47.01 feet; Thence South 17° 19' 53" West, 76.52 feet; Thence South 20° 40' 47" West, 49.55 feet; Thence South 0° 16' 46" West, 76.56 feet; Thence South 10° 42' 47" West, 71.64 feet; Thence South 87° 36' 29" West, 79.00 feet to the Southeaste~y comer of said Parcel 3; Thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Parcel 3, North 24° 09' 57" East, 452.16 feet to the Point of Beginning. Description of Service Levels The proposed services applicable to parcels within Tract No. 29036 for which the charges will be imposed beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002 include: residential street lighting (Service Level B) and refuse collection (Service Level D). Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting - includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the TCSD provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within Tract No. 29036 beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002. Service Level C, is currently not applicable to this development. Service Level D, Refuse Collection - provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the TCSD. The current rate for Service Level D is $172.56 per single family residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all parcels within Tract No. 29036 that have been identified as developed with a residential home, beginning in Fiscal Year 2001-2002. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the rate and charges for this service may be increased by the TCSD after conducting and additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and charges. Service Level R, is not applicable to this development. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The cost to provide services within Tract No. 29036 will be fairly distributed among each assessable property by the same methods and formulas applied to all parcels within the various Service Levels of the TCSD. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's TCSD charges and is applied to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); and Service Level D (Refuse Collection): Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The following tables (Table I and ii) reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level. TABLE I Parcel Charge Calculation for Service Level B Parcel Property Type Unit X Single family residential 1.00 Single family vacant 1.00 Charge Per Parcel Parcel = Charge Multiplier $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel A charge is imposed on all residential parcels developed or undeveloped. Parks, open space areas, easements and non-buildable parcels are not assessed. TABLE II Parcel Charge Calculation for Service Level D Property Type Single family residential Parcel Unit X 1.00 Charge per Parcel = $172.56 Parcel Charge $172.56 Multiplier Per Parcel This charge is imposed only on developed single family residential parcels (with a residential home). Pursuant to Proposition 218, this amount may be increased by the TCSD after conducting an additional protest hearing. TCSD LEVY SUMMARY AND PROPOSED CHARGES Each Service Level within the TCSD provides different and specific services to various parcels within the TCSD. The rates and charges prescribed for each service and level of service are proportionately spread to only those parcels that are provided each respective service (Service Levels). Table III below provides general levy information for the various Service Levels within the entire TCSD for Fiscal Year 2000-2001. TABLE III TCSC Budget and Service Level Summary For Fiscal Year 2000-2001 TCSD BudRet and Charl~es Adopted in Fiscal Year 2000-2001 SERVICE LEVEL Total Levy Charge Per Total Levy Budget Levy Unit Units Service Level B Residential Street Lighting $351,944 $25.68 Service Level C Local Landscaping and Slopes Rate Level #1 (C-l) $47,886 $46.00 Rate Level #2 (C-2) $93,340 $89.00 Rate Level #3 (C-3) $191,516 $116.00 Rate Level #4 (C-4) $226,100 $175.00 Rate Level #5 (C-5) $0 $70.00 Rate Level #6 (C-6) $0 $225.00 13,705 1,041 1,060 1,651 1,292 0 0 Service Level D Refuse Collection $2,551,817 $172.56 14,788 Service Level R Road Maintenance Rate Level #1 (C-l) Rate Level #2 (C-2) $7,146 $115.26 75 $4,511 $121.92 56 Table IV provides estimated annual levy information for the various TCSD Service Levels proposed for Tract Nos. 29036 beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002. TABLE IV Proposed Service Level Charges For Tract No 29036 Estimate Budget and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 SERVICE LEVEL Service Level B: Residential Street Lighting Total Levy Charge Per Planned Total Budget Levy Unit Levy Levy Units Units $616 $25.68 24 24 Service Level D: Refuse Collection $4,141 $172.56 24 24 The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Tables III and IV), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly apportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. APPENDIX A -PARCEL LISTING (FY 2000-2001 ) The actual parcels subject to rates and charges for Service Level B, and Service Level D beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002 shall be those parcels within Tract No. 29036 identified on the Riverside County Secured Roll at the time all TCSD rates and charges are submitted to the County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the tax roll for that fiscal year. The rates and method of apportionment outlined in this Report are consistent with the rates and methods previously approved by the TCSD Board of Directors for each applicable Service Level contained herein. However, all rates and methods described in this Report are subject to revision and modification within the prescribed parameters of the la~v. The actual rates and charges applied on the tax roll each fiscal year shall be apportioned and submitted according to the rates and method described in the final TCSD Annual Levy Report presented and approved by the Board of Directors at an annual Public Hearing. The following pages encompass a complete listing of all parcels within Tract No. 29036 subject to the TCSD Service Level B and Service Level D rates and charges beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The rates and charges applied to each newly subdivided residential parcel wilt reflect the services provided and the development of each respective parcel at the time the rates and charges are applied. The table below provides a summary of the total proposed rates and charges for all properties within Tract No. 29036 based on the existing rates and charges per subdivided single family residential unit: SERVICE LEVEL Service Level B: Residential Street Lighting Charge per Total Levy Total Levy Levy Unit Units Budget $25.68 24 $616 Service Level D: Refuse Collection $172.56 24 $4,141 0 APPENDIX B - DIAGRAMS Copies of the current County Assessor's Parcel Number maps (APN maps) encompassing Tract No. 29036 and a copy of the Tentative Tract Map No. 29036 are provided on the follo~ving pages. The original maps and documents depicted in this Report are by reference made part of this Report. C ITEM 5 APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER . CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Commu 'ty ervice~L'~ m S DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Water Park Feasibility Study Professional Services Contract PREPARED BY: --~"~Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Award a professional services contract of $28,000 to the Natelson Company, Inc. for the preparation of a feasibility study for a Water Park. 2. Approve a 10% contingency of $2,800 for the project. BACKGROUND: On July 11,2000, the City solicited Statements of Qualifications from consulting firms for research and preparation of a feasibility study for a proposed Water Park. The City received one Statement of Qualifications, which was reviewed by a review committee. The submitting firm was invited to make an oral presentation and participate in an interview with the selection committee comprises of Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, Council Member Naggar and staff. It was determined that Natelson Company is qualified to complete the project and staff has negotiated a Scope of Services and compensation of $28,000 for the project. Upon award of a contract, staff will establish a project committee to work with the consultant to set project goals and schedules. The project committee will also review interim findings and provide guidance and feedback to the consultant throughout the process. Natelson Company will conduct background research related to similar facilities in southern California, conduct an intercept survey and community workshop to determine interest and demand for a water park, define market area, and conduct a demographic analysis. Based on the information received, the consultant will define three facility alternatives for further analysis, which will consider size, location, levels of use, potential revenues, and development and operations costs. Finally, the consultant will evaluate potential operating structures; City versus concessionaire operation. It is envisioned that this study and final report will requirement ten to twelve weeks to complete. Natelson Company will present their findings and final report to the Board of Directors upon the completion of the project. R:'~RUSEP~AGENDAS\water park feasibility study-bod.doc FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost of this Professional Services Contract is $28,000, plus an additional ten percent (10%) contingency of $2,800. This project is funded by Capital Project Reserves and Quimby in account number 210-190-170-5802. R:~RUSEP~AGENDAS\Water park feasibility study-bod.doc CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES WATER PARK FEASIBILTY STUDY THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of September 26, 2000 between the City of Temecula Community Services District ("District") and Natelson Company, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on September 26, 2000, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than March 31, 2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4, PAYMENT, a. The District agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Twenty-Ei.qht Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($28,000) plus Two Thousand Ei.qht Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($2,800) as a 10% contingency for the total term of the Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time District's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the District disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. P~Agreements\Consultant 99 I 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the District suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the District shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the District. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the District pursuant to Section 4. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, District shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the District shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by District that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be cleady identi- fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of District or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give District the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit District to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after recaipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the District and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the District without the P~Agreements\Consultant 99 2 permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the District, upon reasonable written request by the District, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the District, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions adsing out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the District. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum ScoDe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, workers compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this projectJlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. P~Agreements~Consultant 99 3 (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: One million ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or selFinsured retentions as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (2) (3) (4) (5) The District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the District. P~Agreernents\Consultant 99 4 e. AcceptabilitV of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covereqe. Consultant shall furnish the District with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an alternative to the District's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10, INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the District a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Distdct nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the District. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against District, or bind District in any manner, b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for District. District shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The District, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without District's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives District notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify District should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery P~Agreements\Consultant 99 5 request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. District retains the right, but has no obligation, to rapresent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, headrig or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Distdct and to provide Distdct with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, District's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by District to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To District: To Consultant: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager Natelson Company, Inc. 24835 East La Palma Avenue Suite I Yorba Linda, CA 92887 Attention: Roger Dale 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the District. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Roger Dale shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Roqer Dale may use assistants, under his direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide District fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Roqer Dale from Consultant's employ. Should he leave Consultant's employ, the District shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the P~Agreements\Consultant 99 6 parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral orwritten, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. RAgreements\Consultant 99 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Natelson Company, Inc. By: Name '~tle: By: Name: Title: (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) PVkgreements\Consultant 99 8 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED P~Agreements~Consultant 99 10 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Work Scope Task 1: Initial scoping session with Project Committee TNCI will meet with the Project Committee at the outset of the assignment to refine the scope of work and to identify any specific issues that the Committee would like to see addressed within each of the outlined tasks. It is anticipated that the Project Committee will include representatives of the City Council and Community Services Commission, City staff, and possibly representatives of the public at large. Task 2: Survey of comparable facilities Based on parameters defined during the initial meeting with the Project Committee, TNCI will conduct a survey of public and private water parks throughout southem California (and potentially other markets as well). For each surveyed facility, TNCI will compile a detailed profile including the following infonnation: · Location · Size (acreage) · List offacilities/amenities · Date opened · Hours/months/seasons of operation · Ownership (private, public, concession, etc.) · Staffing requirements · Development costs (land and facilities) · Fee structure · Annual attendance (broken down by category of visitor) · Annual operating revenues and costs · Demographic profile of clientele · Geographic distribution of clientele · Other key issues that may be relevant to City of Temecula Task 3: Community workshop As part of the initial information gathering process, TNCI will facilitate an evening meeting open to the general public. The purposes of this meeting will be to describe the potential facility to the meeting participants and to solicit their input regarding the levels of interest/demand that may exist for such a facility in Temecula. The meeting will also be used to ascertain the community's preferences regarding the size and components of the facility, and potential locations within the City. It is understood that City staff would be responsible for advertising and public noticing this workshop. Task 4: Community "intercept" survey This task will assess demand for the facility by conducting an in-person "intercept" survey of Temecula residents and visitors. TNCI will conduct the survey at locations such as City parks (i.e., on a Saturday during soccer games), major shopping centers, etc. The purpose of the survey will be to describe the potential facility to area residents to determine their prospective levels of interest. In particular, the respondents will be asked: · Whether they ever visit water parks in other communities; · If so, which facilities they use and how often they visit; · Whether they would anticipate using a water park in Temecula, and how often; · What specific facilities/amenities they would like to included in a Temecula water park; · Where (within Temecula) they would like to see the facility locate (or where they would not like to see it locate); and · How much they would be willing to pay to use a water park facility. Task 5: Define relevant market areas Based on the market data obtained from the Task 2 survey and the additional information derived from Tasks 3 and 4, TNCI will define the geographic areas from which a Temecula facility could realistically be expected to draw customers. Given that the actual market area would to some extent be a function of the scale and location of the facility, TNCI will define the relevant market radius in terms of a range of possible scenarios. As appropriate, the overall market area will be segmented into Primary and Secondary sub-areas. Task 6: Demographic analysis TNCI will complete a detailed demographic analysis of the Primary and Secondary market areas defined in Task 5. The following variables will be considered: · Population · income · Household sizes · Age distribution · Commute patterns The demographic analysis will provide both current estimates and future projections, and will pay particular attention to the specific sub-areas within the overall market area where residential growth is expected to occur. The demographic data will be derived from a variety of sources including Census data (for historic benchmarks), forecasts developed by the Southern Califomia Association of Governments (SCAG), State Department of Finance, and private demographic forecasts. TNCI will validate and/or adjust the SCAG forecasts based on a detailed review of anticipated residential development in the City of Temecula and the relevant surrounding communities. Task 7: Presentation of initial findings to staff/project committee Based on the findings of Tasks 2 through 6, TNCI will conduct a progress meeting with the Project Committee. A key purpose of this meeting will be to define a range of alternative facility concepts to be evaluated in greater detail in subsequent tasks. Task 8: Establish alternative facility concepts Based on the progress meeting with the Project Committee, TNCI will define three facility alternatives to be evaluated in greater detail. The three alternatives will reflect a range of potential facility sizes and locations (i.e., stand-alone facility versus a water park developed within a larger sports complex, freeway versus interior location, etc.). Task 9: Project use levels for each concept alternative For each of the three facility alternatives, TNCI will project annual use levels. TNCI will also project visitor counts on peak days and weeks (in order to define the necessary maximum capacity of the facility). The projections will also be broken down in terms of category of user (i.e., children, adults, school groups, etc.) and the geographic origin of the users (i.e., Temecula residents, residents from adjacent communities, etc.). The projections will be annualized, covering the first ten years of operations. Task I0: Project revenue potentials for each alternative For each of the three alternatives, TNCI will project total annual revenues for the first ten years of operation. The revenues will be broken down by type of user (individual versus group, etc.) and by revenue category (admission, refreshments, etc.). The revenue projections will reflect a range ofpotentiai operating structures, including: · City operated facility (i.e., all revenues accrue to City); · City owned facility operated by a private concessionaire (City would receive concession payments). Task 11: Prepare preliminary cost analysis For each of the three facility altematives, TNCI will prepare preliminary estimates of development and operating costs. The cost estimates will not be engineering estimates based on specific designs, but generalized estimates based on the size of each facility alternative and standard cost factors derived from the survey of comparable water parks. To the extent that any of the alternatives would require that the City purchase land, a preliminary estimate of land acquisition costs would be included. The operating costs will not be presented in terms of a detailed pro forma, but will be based on standard overall cost ratios derived from the survey of comparable facilities. Task 12: Prepare draft summary report TNCI will prepare a detailed report summarizing the findings of the research and recommending a course of action for the City. The report will include a succinct executive summary of findings and recommendations, with the detailed technical analyses fully documented as appendices. Task 13: Present draft report to Project Committee TNCI will meet with the Project Committee to present and review the draft report, and to identify any necessary revisions. Task 14: Prepare final summary report Based on input received from the Project Committee, TNC] will prepare a final summary report. Task 15: Present final report to Community Services Commission and City Council TNCI will present the final report to the Community Services Commission, and refine it as necessary prior to presentation to the City Council. Upon approval of the report by the Community Services Commission, TNCI will present the final report and recommendations to the City Council. EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE P~AgreemenLs\Consultant 99 11 KxHTBIT B Budget and Timeframe The above work scope will be completed within ten to twelve weeks of authorization to proceed for a total fee of $28,000 (TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS), including all professional fees and associated expenses. The breakdown of this total fee by task is as follows: Task 1 ) Initial meeting with project committee 2) Survey of comparable facilities 3) Community workshop 4) Community "intemept" survey 5) and 6) Market area definition / Demographic analysis 7) Progress meeting with project committee 8) and 9) Facility concepts / Projected use levels 10) and 11) Revenue and cost projections 12) Draft summary report 13) Presentation to project committee 14) Final summary report 15) Presentations to Community Service Commission and City Council Direct Expenses (mileage, data, telephone, printing, etc.) Total Fee No charge $6,000 $2,500 $3,000 $4,000 No charge $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 No charge $1,250 $1,500 $ 750 $2&000 Exhibit B provides a detailed breakdown of the above budget by assigned staff person. ITEM 6 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services~ September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Temecula Public Library Master Plan PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: Master Plan. That the Board of Directors approve the Temecula Public Library BACKGROUND: On April 13, 1999, the Board of Directors approved the site selection and preliminary conceptual plan for the new Temecula Public Library and directed staff to begin negotiations with the design architects, LPA, Inc., for the final design phases of the project. The contract for schematic design, design development and construction documents was approved by the Board of Directors on December 14, 1999. LPA has been working diligently with the project design committee comprised of City Council Members Ron Roberts and Jeff Stone, representatives from the County Library Commissioner, Friends of the Library, County library staff, City staff, and other interested parties to complete the final design elements of the project. The design development elements include architectural treatments of the interior and exterior spaces, landscape design, lighting elements, floor plan layout, signage schedule, furnishings, colors and materials and other necessary design elements. LPA has also worked with a sub- committee of County Library staff, Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) staff, and City staff to determine the technical requirements for the facility. The City is seeking to develop a cooperative agreement with the TVUSD that will help meet the growing information needs of our community's student population. The Master Plan provides for approximately 33,000 square feet of library space. The facility offers reference and stack areas, an adult reading porch and other seating and reading areas, computer lab, offices and work areas, study rooms, circulation and reference desks, children's section with story room, the Grace Mellman Heritage Room, garden areas, a Friends of the Library store with work area, parking facilities and other amenities. The final project committee meeting was held on August 22, 2000 at which time LPA presented the R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS\Iibrary master plan finaLcc.doc final design to the Project Committee. The project committee unanimously endorsed the Master Plan and recommended that it be presented to the Community Services Commission for its review and approval. At its September 11,2000 meeting, the Community Services Commission approved the Master Plan and recommended that it be presented to the Board of Directors for final approval. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost to construct the project is $10,675,600. This project is included in the Capital Improvement Program in fund 210-199-129-5804. The project is currently funded $3,728,400. The Community Services Department anticipates applying for approximately $6,900,000 in Proposition 14 grant funding once the application period is opened. R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS\Iibrary master plan ~nal.cc.doc REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUGUST 8, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:45 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, and Chairman Roberrs. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None. Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 27, July 11, and July 18, 2000. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. RECONVENE AS A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COUNCIL/AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Award of Construction Contract for Old Town Southside Parking Lot - Project No. PW98-16 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council award the construction contract for the Old Town Southside Parking Lot- Project No. PW98-16 to TruGreen LandCare, LLC, of Anaheim, California, in the amount of $335,175.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 2.2 That the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $33,517.30 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 2.3 That the Redevelopment Agency appropriate the necessary funds from the RDA Tax Increment Fund Balance in the amount of $115,000.00 to cover the construction contract and contingency. R:M%,linutes\080800 I Agency Member Stone abstained with regard to this matter. Deputy Public Works Director Parks reviewed the recommendation and presented the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the project is located west of Front Street at the intersection of Second Street, immediately adjacent to the Temecula Stampede. For Chairman Roberts, Deputy Public Works Director Parks advised that the Poole property has been included in the proposed project to which Mr. Roberts questioned whether the Poole property should be included at this time. Relaying his recollection as to the City's reasoning for purchasing the Poole property, Agency Member Comerchero concurred with Chairman Roberts, viewing it as a waste of money to incorporate this property at this point in time and, therefore, recommended the exclusion of this property from the proposed contract. Executive Director Nelson recommended that the Agency award the contract and direct staff to execute the change order and to adjust the contract. For Agency Member Naggar, Agency Member Comerchere commented on the vision process for Old Town, noting that he would envision it to be a five to ten year process. MOTION: Director Comerchere moved to approve staff recommendation as amended directing staff to execute a change order reducing the scope of work involving the Poole property. The motion was seconded by Director Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Stone who abstained. At this time, the City Council meeting was recessed. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS No comment. R:~Minutes\080800 1 ADJOURNMENT At 7:56 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 22, 2000, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Robe~s, Chairman A'FI'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\080800 I RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITYATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITYMANAGER _,~ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Redevelopment Director September 26, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of September 26, 2000 for the Redevelopment Department. HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Proclrsm Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 00-01. One loan has closed for $24,000. Residential Iml~rovement Pro¢lrams The program budget for FY 00/01 is $250,000 and $50,586 has been funded. Habitat for Humanit,/ Construction of the two homes is complete. An open house was held on September 1. Re{luest for Qualifications - Affordable Housing Agency staff is negotiating with two development partners to develop 75 -100 affordable housing units within the Pujol neighborhood. Reeluest for Qualifications - Senior Housin~l Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rahab 96 units for affordable senior housing. Recluest for Qualifications - Old Town Community Theater The architect, Fisher Merhman Sehgal and Yanez Inc., has conducted stakeholder and community interviews and is completing the schematic phase of the project. R:~SYERSK~MONTHLLYVepOrt, SeptOO.doc Old Town Tradinq Post Agency staff is handling the acquisition and relocation of the Trading Post property. Escrow closed on August 25, 2000. Facade Iml~rovement/Non-Conformin,q Skin Prowlram The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: · Mad Madeline's Front Deck and Paint The following facade improvements are underway: · The Country Goose Signs · Butterfield Inn Paint and Sign · Circle K Center in Old Town The Redevelopment Agency has negotiated assistance for the rehabilitation of the center. Plans, which include western-style architectural enhancements, are in the design phase. · Summer Nights The Agency is sponsoring Summer Nights in Old Town, Friday night from 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. This promotion runs through September 29, 2000. R:\SyERSKW/ONTHLLYVepOrt,Sept00-dOc ITEM 8 II TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO~VE~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA E CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT September 26, 2000 Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) Planning Application No. 99-0371 (General Plan Amendment) Prepared by: Denice Thomas, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. 99-0261; 2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 APPLICATION NO. 99-0261) 3. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-__ (PLANNING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP TO REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION 99- 0371) R:XP D O\99-0261 79 South\CC $taffReport.doc 1 BACKGROUND: On June 21, 2000 the City of Temecula Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. 99-0261 to the City of Temecula City Council. The proposal is to adopt a Planned Development Oveday distdct, which will develop 32.6 vacant acres within the Professional Office zone with 20 acres of residential and 12.6 acres of commercial. The General Plan designation on the site is Professional Office with a 7--3 Specific Plan Overlay. The Commission found the proposed Planned Development Oveday is consistent with the specific plan provisions in the General Plan. The General Plan states that the vision for this area is to "achieve a comprehensively planned mixed-use development with compatible/complementary mixtures of office, support commercial, residential and services." Staff and the Planning Commission believes that this project satisfies these requirements. A copy of the Planned Development Oveday Ordinance is included in Attachment No. 1. Accompanying this proposal was Planning Application No. 99-0371 which proposes to remove the westem portion of Via Rio Temecula from the General Plan Circulation Map. On July 19, 2000 the City of Temecula Planning Commission recommended approval of PA99-0371 to the City of Temecula City Council. This General Plan Amendment (GPA) originates from the applicant's request to remove the General Plan roadway that was intended to cress their property. General Plan Circulation Element Goal 1 states that the City will strive to maintain a Level of Service uD" or better at all intersections. Removal of this road would not adversely affect future traffic service levels at the impacted intersections. As a result, staff has determined that the removal of this segment of Via Rio Temecula would be consistent with and continue to further the purposes of the adopted City General Plan. The Resolution approving the Circulation Element Amendment is included in Attachment No. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission expressed concems at the June 21,2000 meeting regarding the density of the proposed multi-family component of the project, the design guidelines proposed by the applicant, and the potential impacts to traffic circulation. Proposed density forthe multi-family component- the Commission was concemed that the density may not be consistent with the pending Housing Element Update. Staff addressed these concerns by explaining that incorporating a residential component into this project is consistent with the General Plan. With respect to the pending Housing Element Update, one of the goals of the Housing Element is to provide an opportunity for the development of affordable housing. Although the City is not required to actually build the units, it does have a responsibility to ensure that there are areas within the City where affordable housing is permitted and may develop. With this in mind, Staff feels that approving the residential component furthers the goals of the Housing Element. Design Guidelines- the Commission expressed concerns that the Multi-family and Retail/Support Commercial Design Guidelines presented in the applicant's PDO were not specific enough. The Commission recommended replacing the applicant's design guidelines for the Multi-family and Retail/Support Commercial sections with the City's Citywide Design Guidelines. R:~P D O~9~-0261 79 Souffi\CC StaffReport.doe Traffic Impacts- the Commission expressed concems that the traffic impacts of this project would be more intense than the anticipated impacts if the project were to develop under the existing zoning and General Plan designations. The applicant's traffic study indicates that the proposed project will not result in an increase over the type of land uses already permitted for the property under current zoning requirements. The applicant's traffic engineer has submitted two letters comparing the proposed project with the traffic generated by the underlying zoning. The City's Traffic Engineer has propared a supplemental analysis which is provided with this staff report as Attachment No. 10. TRAFFIC IMPACTS: The Planning Commission expressed concems that the traffic impacts of the proposed project will be greater than the impacts that would occur if the project developed under the current zoning and General Plan designation. In addition, the applicant provided an analysis, which was received after the Planning Commission Meeting held on June 21, 2000, that indicates the following: AM In 800 AM In 199 Existing zoning would generate AM Out 145 AM Out 215 PM In 363 PM In 478 PM Out 912 PM Out 507 Combined AM 945 Combined AM 414 Combined PM 1275 Combined PM 985 Source: August 3, 2000 Coffespondence from RKJK & Associates, Inc. page 3 Table I 601 more trips than the proposed zone change. Existing zoning would generate 70 fewer trips than the proposed zone change. Existing zoning would generate 115 fewer trips than the proposed zone change Existing zoning would generate 405 more trips than the proposed zone change. Existing zoning would generate 531 more trips than the pmposed zone change. Existing zoning would generate 290 more trips than the proposed zone change. In addition to the proposal for a zone change, the applicant is also requesting that the City Council remove the segment of Via Rio Temecula proposed for this site from the General Plan Circulation Element. The Public Works staff has indicated that the road is not a significant traffic generator and removal of the road from the General Plan Circulation Element would not significantly diminish the level of service for Highway 79 South. Although staff is supportive of removing the road from the General Plan, staff also recommends that an east/west connector road, accessible to the public, be constructed to connect this site between Avertida de Missions and Jedediah Smith Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None. R:XP D O\~9..0261 79 South\CO StaffRepoa.doc 3 Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Planned Development Oveday - 4 Ordinance Resolution approwng General Plan Amendment Planning Commission Resolutions Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 21, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes from June 21, 2000 Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 19, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes from July 19, 2000 Initial Environmental Study Correspondence Received A. LandGrant Development dated July 18, 2000 B. LandGrant Development dated August 3, 2000 Traffic Analysis from City's Traffic Engineer Planning Commission Headrig Exhibits B. C. D. E. F. G. Vicinity Map Current Zoning Current General Plan designation Current General Plan Circulation Element Map Proposed General Plan Circulation Element Map Build-out average daily traffic with Via Rio Temecula Road Build-out average daily traffic without Via Rio Temecula Road R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South\CC Staff R~port.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY - 4 ORDINANCE R:XP D O\99~261 79 South\cC Staff R~oa.doc 5 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0261) WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WH EREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on June 27, 2000, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City Zoning Map and Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on September 26, 2000 to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map and the Temecula Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendments To The City Zoninq Map The City Council hereby amends the Zoning Map for the City of Temecula for a parcel identified as APN 961-010-006 from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay No. 4 (PDO-4). Section 2. Planned DeveloDment OverlaV No. 4 Sections 17.22.130through 17.22.138are hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as set fodh in the supplemental standards and requirements for PDO-4, Planned Development Overlay District No. 4 as contained in Exhibit 1 of this Ordinance. PDO-4 is subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit 2. Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study, and hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application 99-0261. The Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit 3 of this Ordinance. Ords%2000- 1 Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 6. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summarythereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC CityClerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2000- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of ,2000 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of __ 2000, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:None Susan W. Jones, CMC CityClerk Ords~000- 2 EXHIBIT 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 R:%P D OLq9-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doe 3 TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.130 Title Sections 17.22.130 through 17.22.138 shall be known as "PDO-4" (Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Oreday District). 17.22.132 Purpose and Intent The Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Oveday Distdct (PDO-4) is intended meet the planned mixed use criteda contained in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. These requirements are intended to provide regulations for the creative design of, and the safe and efficient operation of a unique mixed area within the City. 17.22.134 Relationship with the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the Temecula Creek VIllage Planned Development Oveday Distdct is contained in Table 17.22.136. B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.138, the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area. 1. The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to any development within a Professional Office zoning distdct that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. deemed complete. The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is 3. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 17.22.136 Use Regulations The list of permitted land uses for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay district is contained in Table 17.22.136. B. Planned Development Oveday - 4 contains three different planning areas. Two of the areas are commercial, the third is residentially based. A copy of the Planning Area map for this PDO is contained in Exhibit 17.22.136. The three areas are identified as follows: · Retail/Support Commercial. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4R in Table 17.22.136.B), · Village Commercial Area. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4V in Table 17.22.136.B); and, Multi-Family Residential Planning Areas. Unless specific standards are provided forthis Planning Development Oreday, the residential development standards for the High Density Zoning District contained in Section 17.06 shall apply to this Planning Area. R:~ D O~99-026t 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance,doc 4 Table 17.22.136A Planning Area Exhibit Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District n, tJ U uj <o, R:%P D O~99-O261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doc 5 Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R PDO-4V8 A Adult business Aerobicsldancelgymnasticsljazzerciselmartial arts studios (less than p p 5,000 sq. ft.) Aembicsldancelgymnasticsljazzerciselmartial arts studios (greater p than 5,000 sq. ft.) Airports Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) P Alcoholic beverage sales C~ Ambulance services Animal hospital (indoor only) C Antique restoration Antique sales P Apparel and accessory shops p pa Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P Arcades (pinball and video games) Art supply stores p ps Auction houses Auditoriums and conference facilities Automobile dealers (new and used) Automobile sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display Automobile Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs Automobile painting and body shop Automobile repair services Automobile rental C Automobile salvage yards/impound yards Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash Automotive parts - sales P Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine - with or without an automated car wash R:~P O OL~-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doe 6 Table 11.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use PDO-4R I PDO-4V8 B Bakery goods distribution Bakery retail Bakery wholesale Banks and financial institutions Barber and beauty shops Bed and breakfast Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) Billlard parlor/pool hall Binding of books and similar publications Blood bank Blueprint and duplicating and copy services Bookstores Bowling alley Building material sales Butcher shop C Cabinet shop Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) Candy/confectionery sales Car wash, full service Carpet and rug cleaning Catedng services Clothing sales Coins, purebase and sales Cold storage facilities Communications and microwave instalJations2 Communications equipment sales Community care facilities Computer sales and service Congregate care housing for the eldedy5 Construction equipment sales, service or rental Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental Convenience market Costume rentals Crematoriums p p6 P P P P C p p6 P p p6 p - P p C P p p6 P P C C P C P C P P R:~ D OL99-0261 79 South~C PDO Ordinance.doe 7 Cutlery D Data processing equipment and systems Day cam centers Delicatessen DiscountJdepartment store (less than 20,000 square feet) Distribution facility Drug store/pharmacy Dry cleaners Dry cleaning plant E Emergency shelters Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) F Feed and grain sales Financial, insurance, real estate offices Fire and police stations Floor covering sales Florist shop Food processing Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity Freight terminals Fuel storage and distribution Funeral padors, mortuary Fumiture sales (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) Fumiture transfer and storage G Garden supplies and equipment sales and service Gas distribution, meter and control station General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft. Glass and mirrors, retail sales Govemmental off`ices Grocery store, retail (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) Grocery store, wholesale Guns and firearm sales Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use i PDO-4R i PDO-4V8 P C Ce P P P p p5 P p ps P P P p pe P P p pa P p ps p pa P R:%P D O~99-026t 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doc 8 Table 17,22,136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use }PDO-4R I PDO'4V8 H Hardware stores Health and exercise dubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.) Health and exercise dubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.) Health food store Health care facility Heliporls Hobby supply shop Home and business maintenance service Hospitals Hotels/motels I Ice cream pador Impound yard Interior decorating service J Junk or salvage yard K Kennel L Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers Laundromat Laundry service (commercial) Libraries, museums and galleries (private) Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution Liquor stores Lithographic service Locksmith M Machine shop Machinery storage yard Mail order businesses p pu P P P P P P P p p6 P P p p6 I i I c I P P C P R:~ D OLq9-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doc 9 Table 17,22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4V8 Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objeds, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and produels which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesating, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi- refined products requiring furlher processing or manufacturing, and outside storage. Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage Massage P Medical equipment sales/rental P Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C Mini-storage or mini-warehouse4 Mobile home sales and service Motion picture studio Motorcycle sales and service Movie theaters Musical and recording studio N Nightclubsltavemslbarsldance club/teen club Nurseries (retail) C Nursing homes/convalescent homes C O Office equipment/supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft. Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, P chirepractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance P Paint and wallpaper stores ~ P P p6 R:%P D O~9-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doc 10 Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temeoula Creek Village Planned Development Ove~ay District Description of Use Parcel aleliven/services Parking lots and parking structures Pawnshop Personal service shops P P Pest control services Pet grooming/pet shop P P Photographic studio P P Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) - Postal distribution - Postal services P P Pdnting and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) Pdvate utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) P Q Reserved ~ ~ R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P Radio/television transmitter Recreational vehicle parks Recreational vehicle sales Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard Recycling collection facilities Recycling processing facilities Religious institution, without a day care or private school C Religious institution, with a private school C Religious institution, with a day care C Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business) Residential, multiple-family housing Restaurant with drive-through window Restaurants and other eating establishments p pe Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment J Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage in BP and LI) Rooming and boarding houses I PDO-4R I PDOJ'Va R:~P D OLQ9-O261 79 South~3C PDO Ordlnance.doc 11 Table 17.22,136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use IPD°'4R I PDO'4V8 S Scale, public Schools, business and professional Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) Scientific research and development offices and laboratories Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)~ Solid waste disposal fadlity Sports and recreational facilities Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building3 Swap Meet, outdoor Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales T Tailor shop Taxi or limousine service Tile sales Tobacco shop Tool and die casting Transfer, moving and storage Transportation terminals and stations Truck rentals (no sales or/service) TVNCR repair U Upholstery shop V Vending machine sales and service W Warehousing/distribution Watch repair Wedding chapels Welding shop Welding supply and service (enclosed) Y C P P P P P p p6 Reserved Z Reserved R:%P D O~9-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance,doc 12 1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08,050(G), special standards for the sale of alcoholic beverages. 2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 3. See Section 17.08.050.(E), special standards for indoor swap meets. 4. See Section 17,080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse facilities. 5. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and performance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050. H. 6. The size of the use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet. 7. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted provided that the outside noise levels do not interfere with off-site conversation. 8. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area. Retail/Support Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4R. Village Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4V. Multi-Family Planning Areas A & B use the High Density column in Table 17.06,030. 17.22.138 Supplemental Design and Setback Standards A. Multi-Family. The requirements of the residential component shall depend upon the final approved residential density. Residential densities less than 12 units per acre shall comply with the Medium Density Residential zone standards set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code. Residential densities in excess of 12 units per acre shall comply with the High Density Residential zone standards set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code. The final maximum residential density shall be determined by a traffic analysis provided to the City when an application for development is submitted. The total future project trip generation shall not exceed the number of trips allowable under the General Plan designation for the site. B. Retail/Support Commercial. The development standards for the Professional Office zoning designation set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code shall be utilized for the Retail/Support Commercial planning area. The Village Planning Area for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Oveday has supplemental design guidelines integrated into this PDO. These guidelines are intended to augment the previously adopted Citywide Design Guidelines with requirements specific to this area and are as follows: R:~P D OL99-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doc 13 2 TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE VILLAGE The Village area will serve as the vital activity center of Temecula Creek Village. Centrally located within the project, this group of buildings will contain a welcome mixture of goods and services to complement life in the multi-family neighborhoods. A state-of*the-art clubhouse facility will provide space for meeting rooms, a library and reading rooms, computer rooms and other resident amenities, as well as a "signature" pool and spa. A. MIX OF USES The site of the proposed Village area is approximately seven acres, and will contain a variety of shops and services, including: -retail stores -restaurants -recreational facilities -commercial services -medical and dental offices In some cases, office uses could be located above ground floor retail spaces. In addition, the ancillary uses of the residential neighborhoods, such as the Community Clubhouse with its amenities and Support Retail will be located in the Central Retail Hub. B. SITE ORGANIZATION The buildings in the village core will be organized around the a central spine, which is also the primary entry corridor to the development. 1. The mixed-use buildings planned for the Village Hub area will be sited in such a way that their walls help to define the streetscape. a. The buildings closest to State Highway 79 will be located at the minimum required front setback from that road. central circulation corridor. 3. Additional buildings will be organized along the corridor, with their entries pushed to the "imagined" property line along the circulation road (the back of the sidewalk), creating an "urban" environment. Pedestrian pass-throughs will be created in the gaps between buildings Cpaseos") to give access from parking areas. 4. The buildings sited along the boulevard will be separated to allow vehicular entry into the parking areas, which will be located behind (and in some cases beside) the buildings. 6. The visual axis of the central corridor will be terminated by the community center building and its associated open space. Architectural primary "Gateway" Element ~ Driveway P~adt~strlan Pedestrian · ~ ~,-~"~'eei~ Access iarking---, iS R il/~ etail/~:~dla e t Area _ o~ce · fec,, ~ .t, o tr.ve ~_ .~ =_4~ - pedestdar ~, Access o VILLAGE HUB 2. The primary driveway into the complex will be framed by buildings on either side, creating a "gateway" into the TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE "VILLAGE" C. PARKING AND CIRCULATION The clustering of related uses in the Village Retail Core makes shared parking opportunities possible. The mix of offices, with their predominant daytime use, with retail and restaurants, busy primarily at night, creates a reciprocal parking condition. For this reason, the village parking demand would be lower than what is otherwise required by the City of Temecula's Development Code, It is proposed that the total demand of the anticipated uses will be five spaces per thousand square feet of leasable retail/office area. 1. Direct vehicular access to the Village will be available via a proposed controlled intersection along Highway 79 South onto the projecrs principle entry drive. This tree- lined street will provide easy ingress to and egress from the parking areas serving the facilities, in addition to angled parking spaces located on the drive itself. Auto circulation will feature a continuous loop through the public area of the village, helping to alleviate congestion in this part of the site. AUTO CIRCULATION IN VILLAGE HUB 2. Parking lots will be located behind (and in some cases beside) the proposed buildings, so that the buildings help to screen the parking areas. The lots will be landscaped to soften the hard edges of the paving, and provide pockets of shade. 3 PARKING CONFIGURATION ~ RETAIL VILLAGE 3. The "downtown" core will also be served by double rows of diagonal parking, angled in the direction of travel both in and out of the village area. Pedestrian "collector" walks will be detailed with contrasting paving materials leading to identified crosswalks. a. Accessible parking will be located in the angled parking which is curbside near retail entries. b. Crosswalks will be [aid out to coincide with pedestrian plaza areas. 4. Convenient bike parking will be provided in the Village core to encourage human-powered travel in this area. ,._ PEDESTRIAN GATHERING AREA $T0UTEIIBOR0~GII~ TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE "VILLAGE" D. PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACES Generous landscaped plaza areas are planned in the midst of the retail village to encourage the accumulation of patrons in the core who wdl visit a number of establishments on any given outing. 1. These outdoor gathering areas will be linked to the system of walkways and bike paths which traverse the site, creating convenient access for residents. 2. Pedestrian gathering areas will be made comfortable through the inclusion of amenities which encourage rest stops: -benches and shade structures or trees -trash cans and (where applicable) ash urns -kiosks E. BUILDING SCALE AND DESIGN 4 d. large openings with clear glass will be provided at the street level to provide increased visibility into the retail spaces. e. select staggering of upper and lower floors to avoid unbroken two-story wall surfaces. f. use of staggered parapet heights and sloping roof forms to give variety to building "skylines." 3. Buildings with ground floor retail will be set close to the streets to facilitate pedestrian access. 4. Restaurants and food uses within the village will be encouraged to provide outdoor dining facilities. Where possible, these "fresh-air" eating patios should adjoin pedestrian walkways. 1. The Village area structures will be limited to one or two stories, and will be designed to be complementary to the existing residential scale of the neighborhood. Canopy -': 2. Buildings will be designed to include sufficient articulation of their mass to provide an adequate sense of scale. Specific details which may be used for this purpose include: a. Offsetting portions of the buildings to avoid long expanses of unbroken wall surface. b. Locating entries and fenestration in recesses to provide additional shade and shadow on the building faces. c. Use of awnings, canopies, and blade signs to provide additional light/shadow play and visual rhythms. EXTERIOR pERSPECTIVE ~ VILLAGE AREA 5. Exterior building finishes should consist of a complementary variety of quality materials, including the following: -exterior plaster in various textures and colors -exposed colored concrete block of split face, fluted, burnished, or sandblasted textures -brick and natural or cultured stone -decorative architectural metals, such as grilles or railings -metal or concrete (not mission) tile roofs -metal or fabric canopies or awnings STOUIEIIBOROUGI~ TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE "VILLAGE" -clear and/or tinted glass (non-reflective) -glazed ceramic or natural porcelain tile accents -slate tile -decorative light fixtures -architectural accent lighting -limited use of wood trim around glazed openings F. LANDSCAPING Landscaping in the Village will generally be used to complement the building architecture, provide color, scent, shadow and movement, and contribute to the overall comfort and attractiveness of the development. A hierarchy will be established in the plant palette which uses the largest materials in the most open areas, with the scale progressively diminishing as transitions are made to predominantly pedestrian areas. 1. Special themed landscaping will be developed to identify the entrances from the existing public streets to the various parts of the development. a. Repetition of particular colors, leaf forms, or plant groupings. b. Inclusion of architectural landscape elements, such as low walls or lamp posts. "THEMED"LANDSCAPING 2. "Street" trees will be chosen for the village area which bring color and shade, but do not litter the sidewalks. These trees will be located in tree wells where they may be underplanted with drought tolerant annuals or perennials. 3. Parking lot trees will be chosen for their wide-spreading canopies, to provide a maximum of shade on the paved areas. 4. Strip planters a minimum of seven feet wide will be provided at each end of every column of parking spaces, and finger planters will be provided at a minimum of one for every ten spaces. PARKING AREA pLANTING T minimum planter Finger planter minimum 1 per 10 par~ing spaces 5. Pedestrian paths and gathering areas should feature a large-scale tree as a focal point, but will be accented with lower plant materials chosen for their durability, color, and scent. In order to protect plantings in heavily traveled areas, the planters may be curbed or raised above grade. Candidates for plant materials include the following: -salvias, achilleas, jasmines, wisteria, crape myrtle, limonium, oenothera, and cape plumbago EXHIBIT 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~P D OLq9.-0261 79 SouthM::;C PDO Ordinance.doc 14 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No: PA99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay) Project Description: A Planned Development Overlay District to include 32.6 acres within the Professional Office (PO) zone and General Plan Amendment located on the south side of State Highway 79 South, west of Avenida De Missions and east of Jedediah Smith Road Assessor's Parcel No: 909-290-058 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of such failure of to satisfy this condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, conceming the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time pedod. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the lans use approval without further notice to the applicant. R:tP D OLq9-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance,doc 15 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan and text to include a public multi-purpose trail along Temecula Creek. This approval shall have no fome or effect until such time as the General Plan Amendment has been approved by the City Council, modifying the Circulation Element Map. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformanca with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South\CC PDO Ordinance.doe 16 EXHIBIT 3 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 R:~P D 0%990261 79 South',CC PDO Ordinance.doc 17 Mitigation Monitoring Program Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay District No. 4) Planning Application No. 99-0371 (General Plan Amendment) TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring To ensure that any future traffic impacts originating from this site are equal to or less than the number of average daily trips identified in the traffic study for the General Plan. Submit a traffic study with the first subsequent Planning Application. Submit a comprehensive traffic study with the first subsequent Planning Application to determine the maximum number of residential units and commercial square footage that can be constructed on the site, The assumptions and results of the study shall be approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments prior to any completeness determinations. Prior to the 'being determined complete and being scheduled for any public hearing. Party: Planning Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitor: The ramoval of an east/west connector road between Avenida de Missions and Jedediah Smith, An access shall be provided that is publicly accessible that will provide an east/west connection between Avenida de Missions and Jedediah Smith Road. Incorporate a public travel way east/west connection between Avenida de Missions and the intersection of Jedediah Smith Road with Highway 79 - South. Prior to the approval of any subsequent Planning Applications on this site. Planning Department R;~P D O~99-0261 79 South~lit Mont'g Prog,doc 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitor: Adverse change in the significance of a historicel or archaeological resource Identify, recover, preserve and document resources of historical and archaeological significance Condition the project upon the requirement that if any cultural resources or human remains are exposed during grading, ground disturbance activities in the vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately and the City shall be contacted and a qualified archaeologist shall be brought to the site to evaluate the resource. If discovered resources merit long-term consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report these resources. Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during all grading operations Planning Department and Department of Public Works R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~vlit Monrg Prog.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT R:~P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Repoa.doc 6 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0371) WHEREAS, LandGrant Development filed Planning Application No. PA99-0371 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on July 19, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to the Application on September 26, 2000, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the Application; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. Via Rio Temecula, west of Avenda de Missiones is hereby removed from the Circulation Element Map of the General Plan for the City of Temecula. Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. An Initial Study prepared forthis project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures that are attached to Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Applications 99-0261 and 99-0371 that have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:\G P A\PA99-0371 \CC Resolution.doc 1 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of September, 2000. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,199_, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\G P A\PA99-0371 \CC Resolution.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS R:~P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC StaffReport.doe 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AN ORDINACE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0261)" WHEREAS, the Applicant filed Planning Application No. 99-0261, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 99-0261 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. 99-0261 on June 21, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended conditional approval of Planning Application No. 99-0261 to the City Council subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. 99-0261 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinf:ls. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Oveday) hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposal, as conditioned, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (PO) Professional Office and Specific Plan Oveday Area Z3 of the City General Plan. B. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of residential and commercial development proposed. C. The proposed Planned Development Oveday Zoning District is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the project will not approve any specific on-the-ground development and future development requests will require additional and appropriate review. R:~P D O~)-0261 79 South~PC Staff Report,doc 7 Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An environmental initial study has been propared for Planning Application No. 99-0261 in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act. As a result, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission make recommendation to the City Council adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Planning Application (PA99-0261). Section 4. Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Ordinance for Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay), substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A and subject to the conditions set fodh in Exhibit B, attached hereto. and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21th day of June 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21 th day of June, 2000, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, WEBSTER, GUERRIERO NOES: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: TELESiO, MATHEWSON ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:%P D OLq9-0261 79 South~PC Staff Report,doc 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0371) WHEREAS, LandGrant Development filed Planning Application No. PA99-0371 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on July 19, 2000, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. _The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the Application, makes the following findings: A. The proposed amendment to the Circulation Element Map would not adversely impact areawide traffic drculation; B. The proposed amendment to the Circulation Element Map would not be contrary to the goals and policies contained in the adopted Circulation Element of the General Plan; and, C. The proposed amendment to the Cimulation Element Map would not be inconsistent with the other Elements of the adopted General Plan. Section 3, Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project would not create any significant impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Recommendation. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Application to amend the adopted Circulation Element Map by removing Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missions from the Plan. R:\G P A~PA99-0371 ~staffrpt.pc.doc 4 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning CommissionoftheCityofTemeculaataregularmeetingthereof, held on the19 dayof July, 2000 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: MATHEWSON, TELESiO, WEBSTER 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: CHINIAEFF 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE I PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GUERRIERO Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~G P A%PA99-0371~staffrpt.pc,doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED JUNE 21, 2000 R:~P D O\99-0261 79 Souih\CC StaffR~port.do~ 8 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 21, 2000 Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay)- TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE Prepared by: Denice Thomas, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000~,_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AN ORDINACE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0261)" APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Chds Smith, Old Vail Partners/LandGrant Development PROPOSAL: To adopt a Planned Development Oveday district to develop 32.6 vacant acres within the Professional Office zone with 20 acres of residential and 12.6 acres of commercial. LOCATION: Generally located on the south side of State Highway 79 South east of Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Office (PO) Z3 Specific Plan Overlay District EXISTING ZONING: Professional Office (PO) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Professional Office (PO) South: Open Space (OS) East: Low Medium Density Residential (LM) West: Highway Tourist Commercial (HT) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant R:~P D OLq9-0261 79 South~PC Staff Report.doc 1 SURROUNDINGLAND USES: North: Vacant South: Temecula Creek East: Residential West: Vacant BACKGROUND The owner of this property has been in contact with the City regarding this proposal sinca February 25, 1999. The formal application for this project was filed on June 30, 1999 and was deemed incomplete on July 7, 1999. An August 5, 1999 meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the project in detail. On August 9, 1999 a detailed letter was provided to the applicant, which enumerated the Planning Department's concems. The applicant revised the proposal and submitted a revised list of uses for staff review. On September 29, 1999 staff provided the applicant with comments on the review. On November 29, 1999 the law offices of Greenberg & Bass submitted a letter to the City advising that the applicant has filed for relief under the Bankruptcy Code. Although bankruptcy was filed, review of this project was continued at the request of the applicant. On February 17, 2000, the applicant made a revised submittal that incorporated comments from previous meetings and correspondence. On March 9, 2000, after many revisions, a Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting was held. On March 23, 2000 a follow-up DRC letter was forwarded to the applicant deeming the project incomplete again. The applicant made the modifications suggested by staff, revised the proposal and resubmifted. The project was deemed complete on May 12, 2000 and scheduled for fie next available headng date, which was June 21, 2000. The Development Code contains provisions for Planned Development Overlay districts in Chapter 17.22. The Code provides a process for the creation of mixtures of uses in smaller areas where a specific plan or village center oveday is not appropriate. The applicant is proposing a Planned Development Oveday district (PDO), entitled Temecula Creek Village, with a mixture of residential and commercial uses for 32.6 vacant acres. Specifically, the project proposes 20 acres of residential uses and 12.6 acres of commercial uses. This proposal, if approved by the City Council, would adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, add Section 17.22.130 through 17.22.138 to the Development Code, and amend the Zoning Map. Enclosed in your packets, for your review, is a draft of the proposed ordinance, the environmental initial study, and a booklet that includes more detail regarding the project. The intent of this staff report is to analyze the affects of changing the land use from Professional Office to the mixed uses delineated in the PDO, and to make a recommendation as to its appropriateness. ANALYSIS Site Desion Access The project is located on the south side of State Highway 79 south, east of Jedediah Smith Road and west of Avertida De Missions. Access to the site is provided through the use of one centrally located main access near the Village area, two public access points (one from Highway 79 south and one from Jedediah Smith Road), a fire access from SR-19, and one access from Avenida de Missions. Entry to the residential areas will be restricted to four gated access points that will be accessible to the residents of this gated project. R:%P D O~9-0261 79 South~C Staft Repoft.doc 2 Uses Existing Use Designations The existing zoning and the General Plan designation for the property is Professional Office, which is intended to encourage Iow-dse office development situated in a garden arrangement. Typical uses in this zone include legal offices, medical offices and limited support convenience retail and personal service commercial businesses. Additionally, the General Plan designated this property as a Specific Plan Overlay Area. The intent of the Specific Plan Overlay Area is to require a coordinated, comprehensive planning approach for specified areas of the City. The properly in question is designated as a Z3 Specific Plan Oveday Area. The General Plan envisioned that the land uses in the Z3 future specific plan area would include a mixture of uses including office, support commercial, residential, services, as well as recreational and open space uses. The applicant is proposing a mixture of support commercial, village commercial and residential uses for this site. The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the General Plan. Proposed Use Designations The project would create a neighborhood with integrated commercial uses to meet the daily needs of its residents. The proposed Planned Development Overlay Distdct text would add detailed land use matrix, development standards, and supplemental design guidelines to Chapter 17.22. The proposal is consistent with the Development Cede requirements for Planned Development Oveday Districts. Project Design The project site is situated along the north side of Temecula Creek west of Jedediah Smith Road and east of Avenida De Missions. The proposed Planning Areas from west to east are as follows: 5.6 acres of retail/support commercial, 9 acres of multi-family residential uses, 7 acres of village uses, and 11 additional acres of multi-family residential uses. The proposed residential density range is 16 to 20 units per acre Retail/Support Commercial -This area of the PDO allows for views to the creek while providing the tenant with visual opportunities from Highway 79 South. The land use concept for this area is a combination of Neighborhood and Community Commercial Zones. This area will also provide a transition between the Highway Tourist Commercial area located to the west and the multiple family areas. Multi-Family Residential - The clustered medium density residential development will surround the Village component of the project. The suggested density for the project is between 16 and 20 units per acre. The Floor Area Ratio for this planning area is proposed to be 0.45 with a maximum allowable height of 30 feet. The applicant is opting to rely on the City's Development Code for calculation of the pdvate outdoor open space requirements and the panking requirements for the residential component of the project. The proposed outdoor amenities in these areas include a clubhouse, pools, spas, bar-b-ques, and play lots. The residential area will be within walking distance of the Village commercial area. Village - This component of the project is the heart of this PDOs design. The Village area is accessed from the main entry via a boulevard style entrance from Highway 79 South. This area is intended to serve as the gateway to the project. The applicant is proposing outdoor gathering places complete with benches, trash receptacles, pedestrian walkways, and bike paths. The R:%P D OLq9-0261 79 South~PC Staff Report,doc 3 parking standards for this area will be based on the Development Code. The applicant is also proposing a list of landscape matedais. While this information is helpful in an advisory sense; staff is recommending that the final landscape palette be determined when a detailed development plan is submitted and the proposed plant matedais are reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect for suitability. Signage As with other elements of the project that are not specifically delineated, signage for this project will be coordinated with the applicable existing City Sign Ordinance and the guidelines provided in the proposed PDO. The review of signage will be conducted as the development plans are submitted for review. Other Design Consideration Staff has identified an additional item that should be added to the project. This item is a community accessible hiking/biking trail adjacent to Temecula Creek. This would connect with other citywide creekside trails and would allow non-motodzed community access to the Village commerdal area. The trail would be an amenity to area residents and businesses, as well as an amenity for those residing in the multi-family component of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study has been prepared for this project and accompanies this staff repod. The project being reviewed with this Initial Study is for the Zone Change and future General Plan Amendment. Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the City Council. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan uses of Professional Office with a Specific Plan Oveday. This project site is descdbed as future Specific Plan Area 7-3. The proposed Planned Development Oveday is consistent with the future specific plan provisions in the General Plan. The General Plan states that the vision for this area is to "achieve a comprehensively planned mixed-use development with compatible/ complementary mixtures of office, support commercial, residential and sen/ices." Staff believes that this project satisfies these requirements. However, there is also a potential conflict with the General Plan. The Circulation Element Map currently depicts a road, labeled Via Rio Temecula, as traversing the southem portion of the site from east to west. The applicant is also proposing the deletion of this proposed road from the General Plan. The applicant filed an application, PA99-0371, for a General Plan Amendment on September 15, 1999. The applicant has submitted a traffic study, which was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. Additionally, the applicant has met with the Public Works Department regarding the potential impacts to circulation if the road is removed. The Public Works Department has indicated that they would be supportive of the proposal to delete the road. Furthermore, according to the General Plan traffic study, this segment of Via Rio Temecula would be expected to carry see less than 2,000 tdps per day. Given the minor traffic volumes carried by this segment of Via Rio Temecula, staff is not anticipating any future problems from this proposal. This item will be presented for the Commission's consideration next month. Staff is anticipating that both proposals will be submitted simultaneously to the City Council for final consideration. R:~P D OL~-0261 79 South~C Staft Report.dec 4 SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Staff supports this innovative design with the addition of the community and resident bicycle trail/pedestrian path. The proposed Planned Development Overlay meets the requirements of the Development Code and is consistent with most of the General Plan. The remaining General Plan issue will be brought forward for the Commission's formal consideration later next month. To ensure consistency with the General Plan, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve the project with the condition that a General Plan Amendment, approving the removal of this segment of Via Rio Temecula, be adopted prior to the Planned Development Oveday becoming effective. FINDINGS The proposed Planned Development Overlay district and the General Plan Amendment are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. The project will provide neighborhood and support services for the existing residential development, as well as, providing a transition between the existing highway tourist commercial zone and the existing residential development to the east of the project. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Proposed Ordinance - Blue Page 9 Exhibit 1 - Planned Development Oveday - Blue Page 11 Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 24 Exhibits - Blue Page 27 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map Initial Study- Blue Page 30 R:~P D O~<:J-0261 79 South~PC Staft Repo~.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JUNE 21, 2000 R:XP D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report.do~ 9 PlanComnVminutes/062100 Ms, Miller, Commissioner Webster, echoed by environmental issues associated with this padicular site which graded. Development project go forward. respect to the General PI ;taffs interpretation the Commissioner Fahey utilized as an example, notin! strongly that this was an i , of build; project and could be and relayed that she would Commissioner Mathewson that with respect to the development in the suppod of the project. Commission comments, noting ~uld be his desire for additional liar features; and relayed his Chairman his support of the project. MOTION: Fahey moved to approve staffs ation with the addition (regarding a reduction of wall signage), (regarding with the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation as in the supplemental agenda material. The motion was reflected unanimous approval. It was noted that at 6:44 P.M. the meeting recessed, raconvening at 6:50 P.M. 6 Planning3 Al~plicetion No. 99-0261 - Ranned Development Ovedav - TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE (located on the south side of State Route 79 ('south) east of Jedediah Smith Road. Associate Planner Denice Thomas RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010- 006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0261 )' PlanComm/minutes/062100 Via overhead maps, Associate Planner Thomas provided an overview of the project (per agenda material), highlighting the location of the site, and the impacts of the land-use changes; specified the zoning encompassed in the Planned Development Oveday (PDO); with respect to the circulation, noted that the applicant was proposing to delete the proposed Via Rio Temecula mad that would traverse the site; relayed that the General Plan amendment had not been approved at this time, advising that the Planning Application No. was PA99-0371 and was submitted on September 5, 1999, noting that the applicant had been in communication with the Public Works department; relayed that the applicant was proposing an ordinance which would include Design Guidelines which would ultimately be adopted into the Development Code; relayed that the initial study reviewed solely the land use changes; and noted that when specific projects were proposed, that specific environmental impacts would be reviewed. In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding the deletion of Via Rio Temecula, Senior Algeria relayed that staff had reviewed the alignment of this mad and the parcel map to the south of this project, providing additional information. Senior Planner Hogan noted that when the General Plan was originally prepared the circulation map this particular road was not precisely located, relaying that it was a conceptual road intended to link with the existing roadway south of the homes located to the east and ultimately to link with Jedediah Smith Road; advised that the preliminary traffic analysis revealed that this road would have limited tdps and hence the Planning and Public Work Departments would be recommending approval of this amendment when it was presented before the Planning Commission; and for Commissioner Webster, advised that staff had no knowledge with respect to a proposed timeframe for creek improvements, or if the creek would be improved in this area. For Commissioner Telesio, Senior Planner Hogan clarified the conceptual location of Via Rio Temecula, confirming that there was no project between this proposal and the creek. In response to Commissioner Webster, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that during the circulation update process there had been an additional creek crossing added from the vicinity of this area across Temecula Creek, noting that the exact location had not been identified and was not a part of the current circulation element. For Commissioner Mathewson, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that if there were concams regarding Design Guidelines that those comments should be expressed at this time, advising that the proposal, if approved, would become the zoning and the standards for the property unless the Commission opted to not proceed as proposed, and to add language that allows for future changes or flexibility. W~th respect to the parking requirements (referencing page 3, paregraph C), Commissioner Mathewson relayed concam regarding the adequacy of the parking requirements, noting the potential for restaurant uses of this site; and requested that this language be stricken from the Design Guidelines and be developed at the time specific developments are presented. Additional discussion ensued regarding the anticipated trip generation (ATG). Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the initial study was solely based on the zoning, noting that when the development plans were presented there would be a detailed traffic and biological analysis. PlanComm/minutes/06210Q Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the ATG's would be corrected pdor to this data going forward to the City Council. For the record, Chairman Guerdero, and Commissioner Webster relayed that they had met with the applicant and the applicant's representatives. Mr. Chds Smith, representing the applicant, provided a history of their development in the Temecula area; presented a project history since the late 1980's inclusive of past proposals and litigation, noting that for the past year-and-a-half the applicant had been working with the City with respect to a site plan which culminated into this particular proposed project; and for Commissioner Mathewson, reiterated that the project would generate more than 2,000 trips a day. Mr. Timothy Jay Miller, attomey representing the applicant, provided additional information regarding the proposal, referencing the General Plan; and relayed further specification regarding the Z~ zoning designation. Mr. Daniel Gehman, rapresenting the applicant, addressed the Design Guidelines developed for this specific proposal; relayed that access to the uses which would most likely be frequented often would not require a vehicular trip away from the site; specified the proposed village area, the retail/support services area, and a sedes of pedestrian/bicycle paths which would link the vadous functions of the site together; and for Commissioner Mathewson, relayed that with respect to the pedestrian path along the creek, vadous concepts for access from this area to the residential area, noting that the specific route had not been identified. With respect to the area along the creek, Associate Planner Thomas advised that staff would recommend that the path be accessible to the public. In response, Mr. Gehman relayed the applicant's agreement with the recommendation. Mr. John Lynn, 32237 Placer Belair, relayed for the record that this proposal was not consistent with the City's approved Growth Management Plan; referencing the policy, noted that General Plan amendments and changes of zones should be denied within the City that result in increased traffic levels du~ng the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) Planning process; and relayed the following additional language: analyze the cimutation system impacts as they relate to proposed land-use changes along the 79 South/Winchester confdor and the 79 South Corffdor. Traffic modeling shall he performed for any changes as part of the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) process. The cities shall ve~fy the results of the modeling; and advised that this project had not been adequately modeled or verified. For Mr. Lynn, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that this proposal did not currently have a density range attached to the residential area, noting that staff was of the opinion that with the proposed mixed uses, this project would be effective in keeping vehicles off the streets and providing areas where people could live and walk to services, advising that the proposal was consistent with the General Plan, cladlying staffs support of the project; and noted that Mr. Lynn raised a good point with respect to the Growth Management Action Plan. PlanComm/mlnutes/062100 In response, Mr. Lynn reiterated that the proposed project encompassed a change of zone; and queded whether the City's General Plan would be changed to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. In response, Planning Manager Ubnoske confirmed that the General Plan would be amended, noting that elements of the Growth Management Action Plan would be taken into account. Ms. Albia Miller (relaying at this point in the meeting that she was a resident of Wildomar) noted her concam with additional development, specifically with respect to traffic impacts; and noted her recommendation for the City to focus on environmental issues. Mr. Smith urged the Commission to consider an equitable decision with respect to the landowner, noting the current tax cost of $200,000-250,000 per year that the applicant had paid for the infrastructure in this area; and advised that the village concept would be successful at this particular location. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's quedes, for clarification, Senior Planner Rockholt relayed that based on the General Plan's analysis, there would be 480 ADT's per acre, noting that them were 32 acres which would encompass approximately 13,000 ADT's, relaying that the traffic analysis data for this specific proposal had denoted 11,400 tdps per day. The Commission relayed its conclusions, as follows: Commissioner Fahey relayed concam with respect to clarification in the staff repod regarding the traffic impam, recommending that the Commission not move forward with this project until the matter had been dadfled, and until there was additional spedficity with respect to how this project corresponds with the Growth Management Plan adopted by the City Courtall; advised that if the traffic thresholds were lower than what was originally planned for this area, then the Growth Management Plan Guidelines would be met; and recommended continuing the matter. In concurrence with Commissioner Fahey, Commission Mathewson recommended continuing the matter; relayed his concam with respect to the Design Guidelines, the consistency with the Growth Management Plan, and the proposed zone change to allow for high density residential; in light of the fact of the pending housing element update which would be presented to the Commission at a future date, noted that he was not in a position to approve an additional multi-family area without a good basis of what the updated housing element would reveal in terms of policies and guidelines; relayed that at this point he would be uncomfortable approving any project that encompassed a multi- family residential area; and noted that while he was a strong suppoder of the village concept, it would be his desire to have the housing element data pdor to moving forward with this proposal. Commissioner Telesio relayed that he shared a level of discomfort with the unknown factors, noting that he would like to see a draft copy of the housing element in order to review the density issues; advised that he favored the village concept; and relayed that he would be reluctant to approve the project until the previously-mentioned issues were addressed. PlanComm/minutes/062100 Commissioner Webster relayed that this project was completely in conformance with the General Plan, noted that the proposed mixture of uses would be appropriate for this location; with respect to the Growth Management Policy, which was prepared by the City Council without input form the Planning Commission or any of the City's Commissions, noted that it was in direct conflict with the City's goals and elements in the General Plan; advised that there was an existing Growth Management Element within the General Plan that had specified standards, noting that the City had not followed through with the guidelines; reiterated that this project was in conformance with the General Plan, reiterating that the Growth Management Policy was not; advised that with respect to future development approvals within this project site the crucial issues would be the schedule of permitted uses and the Design Guidelines; relayed that the Design Guidelines should be more specific, recommending minor enhancements to the Design Guidelines, specifically with respect to the multi-family residential area; noted the extreme shortage of high density affordable housing; advised that to ensure an effective village canter, there would need to be a higher core of residential surrounding the village center; with respect to the layout of the multi-family residential area, recommended modifications with respect to the pedmetar parking, recommending more of a garden- style apartment complex; with respect to the far west end of the property in the retail/support commercial area, recommended that this area comply with the Neighborhood Center Guidelines within the City's Design Guidelines; and recommended moving forward with this project with the modified Design Guidelines. Chairman Guerdero relayed that he, too, was in favor of the village concept; advised that due to the lack of employment in this area, ultimately the residents residing at this location would be ddving in order to commute to work; relayed that he had discussed with the applicant his concem regarding the multi-family density area while acknowledging the lack of affordable housing in Temecula; noted that his pdmary concams were the traffic flows on Highway 79, and the high density areas and its impact upon the schools; relayed that in his opinion the Growth Management Plan was designed for large-scale developments (i.e., Wolf Creek); and noted that he concurred with Commissioner Webster in moving forward with the project with modifications with respect to the density range and with respect to the traffic impacts. For clarification, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the traffic study did show a reduction in the generation of traffic trips based on the zoning change by approximately 1500 trips a day; with respect to the housing element update, advised that she did not foresee any negative impacts with the State regarding adding additional multi-family areas; and advised that it would be 30-60 days before the draft form of the element would be presented to the Commission. Commissioner Fahey relayed that while this project was an appropriate development for this area, that it was vital that the staff report was accurate; recommended that the Growth Management Plan be addressed; concurred with revising the Design Guidelines; and recommended continuing this matter to address these issues. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to continue this item to the July 19, 2000 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson. (Ultimately this motion was amended.) PlanComm/m|nutes/062100 Mr. Smith respectfully requested the Commission to vote for or against the proposal, noting his opposition with respect to the continuance; and relayed that the applicant's traffic engineer was available for questions. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to deny the project, as proposed. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and roll call vote reflected denial of the motion, as follows: 2/3/0/0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Mathewson, and Telesio. Fahey, Guerdero, and Webster. None. None. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the project and that the Commission provide specific guidelines with respect to the Design Guidelines being modified, that specific data be relayed to the City Council with respect to the traffic study, and that there be clarification with respect to the Growth Management Plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster. (Ultimately this motion was withdrawn.) Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested that the Commission's comments could be e- mailed to staff in order to ensure that all concerns were relayed in the staff report prior to the item being presented to the City Council. Commissioner Webster recommended that the revisions be specified at this time in order for the applicant to comment. Commissioner Telesio relayed that his concem was respect to the high density, the traffic impacts, and the relationship between the proposal and the Growth Management Plan. In response to Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Smith reiterated staffs comments that the project would decrease the trip generation by 1500 trips a day. Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the proposal was for a PDO which staff would be reluctant to move forward on with the project without the establishment of Design Guidelines. Commissioner Webster recommended that the City's Design Guidelines be adopted with this project, with the understanding that as specific projects proceed through the development process, additional detail would be investigated. Commissioner Fahey commented regarding development projects coming before the Planning Commission, relaying that there would be an opportunity to apply the Growth Management Policy standards at that time. Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed her concam with respect to the PDO being adopted with the City's Design Guidelines, requesting that height and setback standards be established. At this time, Commissioner Fahey withdrew her previous motion. 10 PlanComm/minutes/062100 MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the project with the following modifications: to adopt the Village Guidelines setforth in the applicant's proposal and to reference the City's Design Guidelines for the multi-family residential, retail, and commercial areas. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) Commissioner Mathewson relayed that due to the issues that have not been addressed, he could not support the project at this time. Commissioner Telesio noted that he could support the continuance; and relayed that it was the applicant's desire that the Commission vote to either approve or deny this project, opting not to have the item continued. For Commissioner Fahey, Attorney Diaz confirmed that the Commission could move to continue the matter, if that was the desire. At this time roll cell vote was taken reflecting approval of the motion, as follows: 3/2/0/0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Fahey, Guerdero, and Webster. Mathewson, and Telesio. None. None. ~NER REPORTS Fahey relayed that for future redesign projects, staff Randno Bemardo site that had been recently redesigned, commendi I's new appearance; and specified that the site was comer Road and Randno Bemardo. the B. ahey, Planning Manager L in August the would Commission C. W~th respect to ~m Mathewson q Power Center had been fully site issues, Commission at Margarita Road behind the In response, Chairman applicant's willingness to additional information, noting the in the area. Commissioner Mathe on relayed that he was with the visual appearance of the astic barder proximate to the ~ g dock that was tom. E. With respect to the Promenade housing tract across from the mall site, landscaping on the berm. 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 19, 2000 R:~P D O\99-0161 79 South\CC StaffReport.doe 10 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION July 19, 2000 Planning Application No. 99-0371 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Prepared By: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0371) BACKGROUND This General Plan Amendment (GPA) odginates from a request by the Old Vail Partners and LandGrant Development for the Temecula Creek Village to remove the General Plan roadway that was intended to cross their property. The application for a General Plan Amendment was submitted to the City on September 15, 1999. ANALYSIS Dudng the development of the General Plan in the eady 1990's, Via Rio Temecula was added to the Circulation Element Map between Jedediah Smith and Butterfield State Roads. The purpose of Via Rio Temecula was to provide a parallel roadway to State Route 79 South to create an alternate route in an area of anticipated traffic congestion. The proposed roadway was added to the Circulation Element Map dudng the public headng process. As a result, the odginal General Plan traffic study did not contain Via Rio Temecula. Subsequent analysis by the applicant indicates that this section of the road would carry less that 1,000 vehicle tdps on an average day. The City Public Works Department has reviewed the study and concurs with the results. The results of the applicant's traffic study (Exhibits J and K) show future traffic volumes both with and without this segment of Via Rio Temecula. Copies of Exhibits J and K are located in Attachment No. 3. In addition, an analysis of intersection delays at build-out indicate that there will not be a significant impact to Highway 79 South with this segment of Via Rio Temecula removed. The results of this analysis are shown in the following table. R:~G P A~PA99-O371~zaffrpt.pc.doc Intersection ~ .........A.M. Intersection SR-79 Sout_h_ ...........Rp!ay.Ls_e..c_onds) With Via Rio Temecula 26.7 Without Via Rio Temecula 26.6 Change -0.1 P.M. Intersection Delay (seconds) LOS LOS D 21.5 C D 22.7 C +1.2 The range for average delays at LOS "D" for signalized intersections is 25.01 to 40.00 seconds. The reduction in the average delay at the intersection with Jedediah Smith Road appears to result from a decrease in the amount of cross traffic resulting from the elimination of Via Rio Temecula. Based upon these results, Staff has determined that the removal of Via Rio Temecula from the General Plan would not have an adverse impact on traffic drculation or the environment. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY Staff has reviewed the General Plan to assess the amendments potential consistency. Only one goal statement appears to be applicable in this situation. Circulation Element Goal 1 states that the City will stdve to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections. According to the preceding analysis, future traffic service levels at the impacted intersections would meet this goal. As a result, staff has determined that that the removal of this segment of Via Rio Temecula would be consistent with and continue to furlher the purposes of the adopted City General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the impacts of this project in conjunction with the proposal for Planned Development Oreday No. 4. As a result of this review, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Dedaretion for this General Plan Amendment. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration and the General Plan Amendment removing Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missions and reconnecting it to Highway 79 via Avenida de Missions (Planning Application 99-0371). Attachments: 2. 3. 4. PC Resolution - Blue Page 3 Initial Study - Blue Page 6 Traffic Study Results - Blue Page 7 Exhibits - Blue Page 8 A. Current Circulation Element Map B. Proposed Circulation Element Map R:%G P A~A99-O371~ataffrpt.pc,doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO, 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JULY 19, 2000 R:~P D O\99-0261 79 Souffi\CC StaffRcport.do~ 11 lan to the Open Space/Conservation Element, Item No. 11 (regarding the Center concept), Commissioner Mathewson noted that he had inter ~= differently than Commissioner Webster. Senior Management Analys at this issue could be better addressed at the Joint Workshop. Agenda Item Item required no formal action, the Commission 4. forward with 4 ERACIT Presentation - Responsible Alcohol Consumption in Robed Alexander ) Program Officer Alexander was implemented approximatel Jr years ago; regarding the rove patrols, invited the Commissioners to attend published in the newspaper, obtain the dates for the scheduled DUI ~ additional information regarding the I the sting operations that if a busira over to the ABC, advising that of the ERAC ram, noting that the program additional information liquor store sting operations; noting that the dates were contact him to for Chairman Guerriero, provided ERACIT program; relayed that during ee times the data would be turned license suspended; noted that the majority of arrests at the chec adults; 3mmissioner Webster, relayed that alternate cities had si ' ar programs, noting that trrests in the City of Temecula for driving under the infl nce of alcohol were about t with alternate cities; advised that there wa a requirement to publish the [ he oint dates in the newspaper; noted at since the Shakespeare's nightclub had c sed, there was not a specific area wit a concentrated proliferation of drivers driving un r the influence' for were als nvestigating for drivers driving under the influence of drugs; ar ~r Deputy Direct of Public Works Parks, advised that it appeared to him that the d driving ' in the City of Temecula had decreased sin, ~set of Since this Agenda Item required no formal action, the Commission moved forward with Agenda Item No. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 5 Planning Application No. 99-0371 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:PlanCommlminutes/071900 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99- 0371) Chairman Guerriero advised that he would be abstaining from this issue, and therefore left the dais, Vice Chairman Mathewson presiding. Senior Planner Rockholt presented the staff report (via agenda material), noting that the request for the General Plan Amendment had been made by Old Vail Partners and Land Grant Development to remove a portion of roadway denoted on the General Plan (a segment of Via Rio Temecula); provided additional information regarding the purpose of originally placing the roadway segment on the General Plan; provided additional information regarding the analysis of intersection delays at build-out. indicating that there would not be a significant negative impact if this segment of Via Rio Temecula was removed. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed additional information regarding accidents proximate to this area; and provided the rationale for staffs recommendation to remove this segment of roadway from the General Plan. Commissioner Telesio recalled that this issue had been discussed when the project was presented; and queried whether there was a signal proposed for the center entrance into the project. In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding the previous plan for Assessment District No. 159 to construct Temecula Creek Improvements further to the west, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that at this point in time the land was being utilized for wetland mitigation, noting that it was controlled by the Resource Agencies, advising that staff did not anticipate any additional improvements in this area to Temecula Creek with the exception of a bridge crossing proximate to this area; and confirmed that there was an open space conservation easement in this area. Commissioner Webster relayed that due to the above-mentioned data this was an additional reason to remove this element from the Circulation Plan. Mr. Chris Smith, representing Land Grant Development, for Commission Telesio, relayed that there was a proposed signal at the entry to the Village area, noting that the determination would ultimately be determined by Caltrans; noted that to the best of his recollection, there were proposed traffic signals at Jedediah Smith Road, and Avenida De Missions for a future date when the traffic warranted the installations; with respect to traffic generation, relayed that this particular project would generate less traffic than the Office Professional which was what the area was originally approved for; for Commissioner Chiniaeff, noted that the applicant was proposing an access easement point from Avenida De Missions; relayed that the access points onto Highway 79 would be restricted to right-ins, and right-outs only, with the exception of the center access point which would potentially be signalized. Mr. Larry Markham, representing Mr. Ray Schooley (owner of the properly east of this project), for Commissioner Webster, provided additional information regarding access issues to Avenida De Missions; and provided additional information regarding the area proximate to the proposed segment of roadway to be removed from the General Plan. For Vice Chairman Mathewson, Mr. Smith relayed that the traffic counts for this project reduced the vehicular trips by ten percent (10%) due to the opportunities to live and work at the site. The Commission relayed the following closinq comments: Commissioner Chiniaeff noted his concern which had been raised by Mr. Markham that if this segment of roadway was removed from the General Plan it could additionally remove a condition attached to the map associated with access to Avenida De Missions, advising that his concern was based on ensuring that the residents from Multi-Family Area B could access Avenida De Missions. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the City had conditioned Mr. Schooley's map to provide the right-of-way for that access due to the fact that the property of discussion had been zoned as Office Professional which would be an attractor of traffic; advised that since the this current proposal had been presented with residential units which would not attract traffic, it reduced the need for a circulation element road as a major thoroughfare, requiring only a minor driveway access. Commissioner Chiniaeff clarified that his concern was based on removing the segment of roadway from the General Plan since there would be no obligation for the adjacent property owner to provide access over to Avenida De Missions; queried whether the approval of this project had been inclusive of a requirement to provide access to Avenida De Missions via a signalized intersection for exiting the project. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the Schooley map had been conditioned to provide the right-of-way. noting that this map had been conditioned to provide an exit point at that location per a Public Works requirement, and a Fire and Safety requirement. Commissioner Chiniaeff noted his concern if the property owners could not come to an agreement, and the subsequent inadequate access to the property. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that prior to development on the Schooley map there would need to be development approval, noting that the City would still have the ability to condition the development with respect to the right-of-way area. Commissioner Webster concurred with Commission Chiniaeffs comments regarding ensuring adequate access to the property, recommending that staff address the access issue with future development proposals; and noted that the proposed residential area did have provision of two access points. Commissioner Telesio relayed that he could support the General Plan Amendment. Vice Chairman Mathewson relayed that his concern had been based on access to the project from the east, noting that he could support moving forward with the General Plan Amendment. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; and to adopt the proposed resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted n_.9o and Chairman Guerriero who abstained. MA.~ISSIONER'S REPORTS A. With respect to the memorandum regarding the status report on the Promenad vlall/Power Center, Commissioner Webster relayed that compared to ~roved landscape plan for the parking area, the site did not have of trees planted, advising that there was a fifty percent (50% ;~e required per the Specific Plan, noting that even at full growth not landscaping would meet this requirement, specificall, roximate to the ring roads since there were no field trees in th of the parkin! For regarding the additional investic Ride requirement, from document to needed to be Webster, Attorney Curley provided ado information N Ride facility within the mall area that after it did not appear that there was stated Park N that there was an of language utilized ment; noted that to enforce Measure there hat the obligation existed that there was a clear definition of what the was; advised at the City was going to communicate with the m relay t while exact certainty needed to be clarified that this issue uld be address~ under the original approvals or in the context of future s due to the I Ride facility being part of the expectations of the approvals; staffs intent to move the issue forward with the developer. Commissioner Telesio queried whetl policy standards for Commission staff was in the process of developing S, Attorney Curley relayed that was contours of the standard: investi jurisdictions; and noted tha would bring future date. process of preparing the legal other policies in alternate to the Commission at a Director of Plannin Manager Commission support for the that of there be ~ relayed that based ~ssions with Deputy City past years there had City Council/Planning ~ at which time the Council had direction of communications to the Planninl fission; and noted consideration for modifying the policy, this would need to the Council, as well. Chairmar continL recommended that if the ex-parte comml ts were to the Commissioners disclose the meetings and tics of ~y or in written form. er Mathewson, Director of Planning Ubnoske was a full agenda for the August 1. 2000 Joint City ~yed that ATTACHMENT NO. 8 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:~P D O\99-0261 79 Souffi\CC Staff R=port.doc 12 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Zoning Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Planning Applications No. PA99-0261 & PA99-0371 Planned Development Overlay Area No. 4 (PDO-4) and General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dan Rockholt, Senior Planner (909) 694-6400 Generally located on the south side of State Highway 79 east of Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road. Chris Smith Old Vail Partners/Land Grant Development 12625 High Bluff Drive Ste. 212 San Diego, CA 92130-2054 ~PO" Professional Office, Z3 Specific Plan Overlay Zone "PO" Professional Office The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. This action will adopt the concept for a vision to revitalize the area for mixed-use development known as "Temecula Creek Village." Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The property is surrounded by open space to the south, existing professional offices to the north, low-medium residential uses to the east, and highway commercial uses to the west. Other public agencies whose approval is required Supplemental Information None This Initial Environmental Study is being completed to evaluate the proposed change of zone from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay. The mixed land uses proposed within the zone change application have impacts to the area to a lesser degree than those already in place. No detaited information on the future development of this site is available at this time. All future development projects will receive appropriately detailed environmental review when specific details are available. R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental tactors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Planning Population and Housing Geology and Soils Water Air Quality Transportation/Cimulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significenca None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially signif]cent effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that eadier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Dan Rockholt, Senior Planner Pdnted name and Title ~TEMEC_FS101\VOL1 ~)epts~PLANNING~PDOLqg-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 2 J 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Physically divide an established community? Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with judsdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Pdontially Sign~licant b.p,,ct Pomnlially Signift, ant Unless Lees Than Irapad Commen~: 1 .all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) zone. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. This action will adopt a concept for a vision to revitalize the area with a mixed-use development known as "Temecula Creek Village." This proposal will not divide any established communities. Further, the environmental impacts assodated with Land Use and Planning are consistent with the impacts considered within the proposed PDO, as well as the adopted City General Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Additionally, a traffic study was performed by a Registered Traffic Engineer, which indicates that the ramoval of the proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula is consistent with the goals and polldes of the General Plan. Through existing adopted polides and development guidelines, future development will be subjected to City review as well as additional environmental overeight. When specific projects are proposed, land use considerations will be reviewed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necassanj. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: be Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating. the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Potemin~y Pnle~tialty Sig~dicanl Unless Lees Than I Signilica~l IVitigalimt Signifr, anl No Iml~ct In~oqx~ated Impac{ Impac't ...I Comments: \\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~DeptS~PLANNI NG%PDOL.~9-0261 79 SouthU NITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 ,doc 3 2. e 2. b,c The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. This action considers the adoption of the PDO which includes up to 400 multiple- family dwelling units to be considered in future development. Any construction of future dwelling units will be subject to CEQA review. Therefore, as a result, this action will have less than significant impacts to the environment, therefore mitigation measures are not necessary. This action will not displace any number of existing housing units, therefore will not displace any persons from their dwellings. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sourcos: 1, 2, and 3) 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the dsk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AIquist-Pdolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?. Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Strong seismic ground shaking? Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Potentrally SlOm~cent Unless i Less Than ii) iii) iv) ,/ ,f Landslides? ,/ b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ,/ that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B ,/ of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial dsks to life or property? e. Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of ,,/ septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: 3.ell The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The project is located within the Alquist Pdoilo Special Study Zone for the Wddomar Fault Zone. The General Plan indicates that this area is within Ground Shaking Zone II. Due to the seismic nature of the area, future development could potentially incur moderate to severe ground \\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1%Depts%PLANNING%PDOLqg-G261 79 South%INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 4 shaking, resulting in potential risks to public safety and property damage. To minimize the effects of seismic activities, all development is required to adhere to construction standards outlined in the City's Fire and Building Codes. It is important to note that seismic phenomena is not unique to this project, but rather affects the entire southern Califomia region. Proposed grading for the project would not produce any additional geologic hazards nor creme any unique geologic features beyond those normal dudng construction activities. All grading activities will require plan check review and subsequent inspections to ensure compliance to applicable laws/requirements. When specific projects are proposed, seismic and safety issues will be addressed at that time. As a result, either less than significant or no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUAUTY. Would the project: Issues and Suppading In/ofmolion Sources Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substentlally deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defttit in aquifer volume or a Iowedng of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or dyer, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or dyer, or substentiatly increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Cream or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capsalty of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Place housing within a lO0-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard map? Place within a lO0-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including floeding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? \\TEMEC_FS101~VOLl~Depts~PLANNING%PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 5 Signilicanl 4.all The proposed project is an action to rozone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The environmental impacts associated with hydrology and water quality are consistent with the impacts considered within the approved General Ran and Final Environmental impact Report. In addition, standard erosion protection measures will be required as part of the approval of future grading plan. When specific projects are proposed, hydrologic factors will be reviewed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pofiutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? ~. I~.~. No Commen~: 5.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. All air quality impacts caused by future development stem from mobile source emissions. Regionally, future development will have minimal air quality impacts because the scope of development has likely been anticipated in the regional air quality plan. Discharge of temporary construction vehicle activity will only be temporary in nature, and less than significant given the duration of the project. Local and regional dimate patterns will not be changed due to the relatively small size of the project. Due to the mixed-use nature of the proposed project, minimal odor and emissions are anticipated. Burning wastes are not permitted for this project. Further, the minor change to the Circulation Element will also have minimal impacts to air discharges. When specific projects are proposed, air quality factors will be reviewed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) \\TEMEC_FS101 ~VOLl~DeptS~°LANNING~PDOLqg-0261 79 SOUth\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 6 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Pole~tially Unless ~ ~n Significant tmpacl Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety dsks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersedions) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emergency access? Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting altemative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? Comments: 6.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District and to remove a portion of the proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions to Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Element Map. The applicant has submitted traffic studies for each proposal. The traffic study for the General Plan Amendment evaluated the changes in area traffic volumes with and without the extension of Via Rio Temecula. According to the Study, this segment of Via Rio Temecula is expected to carry approximately 700 vehicle tdps dudrig an average day. If this read segment is removed from the General Plan, the traffic would be rereuted onto Avenida de Missions and SR-79 South. The additional 700 average daily trips on Avenida de Missions and SR-79 South would not change the anticipated Levels of Service for these road segments; which would remain as LOS "D" or better. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated from this General Plan Amendment. The detailed traffic study for the Planned Development Oveday studied potential impacts that may result from future development stemming from this action. This study has been reviewed by Staff, which included a review by the Public Works Department. Staff has concluded that the proposed change to the Circulation Element is consistent with the goals of the approved General Plan and Environmental Impact Report. This conclusion is a result of the comparison of proposed land use changes to existing permitted land uses. Although the proposed project will result in a net increase of daily vehicle trips over the current vacant land, it would not be an increase over the type of land uses already permitted for the property under current zoning requirements. When specific projects are proposed, further circulation impacts will be reviewed at that time, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1,2, 3, 4 and 5) ~\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1%Depts%,DLANNING~PDOLqg-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Have a substantial adverse effect. either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any dpadan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wddlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migretary fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Le~ Tha~ Co~en~: 7.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The site for the proposed zone change does not lie within any area identified as supporting identified endangered species. Biological impacts due to the any future development's proximity to Temecula Creek may occur. However, because this action does not review actual in-the-ground development. Through existing adopted policies and development guidelines, future development will be subjected to City review as well as additional environmental oversight. When specific projects are proposed, land use considerations affecting biological resources will be reviewed at that time. Additionally, any proposed development will require appropriate biological studies, which in tum may result in the modification of the project. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sourcos: 1,2, and 3) %%TEMEC_FS101%VOL1~)epts%PLANNING%PDO~99-0261 79 South%INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 8 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery si(e delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 8.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The future development does not incorporate within its design any use of non- renewable materials, nor cause the removal or loss of mineral resources from the area, since none have been identified. When spedtic projects are proposed, further mineral resource impads will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Crate a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ~\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL1 ~Depts%PLAN NING~PDOLqg-0261 79 South~INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 9 Poleel/ly Polanlially Signirmanl Utlew~ ~ Than 81gnifecam Mi~igalion Significant Impacl Inc~pmaled Imlmcl 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: For a project within the vidnity of a pdvate airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a signiricant dsk or loss, injury or death involving wildland rites, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Signilicant Unler4 ' Less Than Slgnd'lclnt IVktigalion ' Signffic~t IrnFFl .... hax,v.~....t.e~l. Irapad Commen~: 9.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a podion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Given that the proposed development is mixed-use in nature, no increase to explosion hazards, toxic chemical release, or increased safety hazards is anticipated. Emergency response plans and those sections of the Temecula General Plan, which address public safety take into consideration the area at built-out conditions. Fire hazards are increased slightly due to the nature of construction, however all development plans are required to be reviewed by the Fire Department prior to approval. Conditions set forth during this phase of the development process will minimize impacts to less than significant levels. When specific projects are proposed, furlher impacts resulting from hazards and hazardous materials will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary . (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 10. NOISE. Would the project result in: a. ~posum of people to severe noise levels in ex~ss of s~nda~s established in ~e Io~1 general plan or noise ordinan~, or appli~ble standards of other agencies? b. ~posure of persons to or genera~on of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noiB levels? c. A subsrental pe~anent inmase in ambiem noise levels in the projed vidni~ above levels e~s~ng wi~out ~e proje~ d. A substantial temporary or pedodic in~ease in ambient noise levels in ~e pmje~ vidni~ above levels e~sting ~thout ~e proje~ %%TEMEC_FS101%VOL1 ~e~NNING~DO~61 79 Sou~NIT~L STUDY PA-99-261 .d~ Signfir, ant No For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comme~: 10.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Increases in noise levels will be minimal, given that the proposed development is mixed-use in nature. No land uses are anticipated that would cause severe increases in ambient noise levels. Some short-term construction noise will occur during future proposed grading activities. When spedtic projects are proposed, further impacts resulting from hazards and hazardous materials will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. Additionally, future development will require appropriate noise studies, which in turn may require noise mitigation measures at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: Pa~enlbiy Signirmard UnlNe Leee Thaa a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical ,,/ impacts associates with the provision or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmentel impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? b. ,/ c. ,/ d. ,/ e. f. Comments: 11 .all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. No increases to existing governmental, public facilities or services shall result from this action. It can be anticipated that impacts to public facilities and services will %%TEMEC_FS 101 ~VOL1 ~DepIs%PLANNING%PDO~9-0261 79 South%l NITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .do~ 11 occur. However, it is anticipated that the resulting impacts would be minimal and comparable to developments already permitted under existing ordinances and guidelines. When specific projects are proposed, impacts to public services and facilities will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been ident/fied and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing radiities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitiements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted cepadty to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 12.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a podion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Increases to demands for public utilities are anticipated, given that future development will be mixed-use in nature. Mixed-use developments typically have demands to services such as electrical utilities, telecommunicetions infrastructures, sewer and water distribution, etc. Howover, these levels are not anticipated to cause severe demands that would hamper other land uses in the area. Local utility infrastructures are constructed and are being improved to handle increased demands caused by local development When spedfic projects are proposed, impacts to utilities and service systems will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) \%TEMEC_FSIOI\VOL1%Depts%PLANNING%PDOLqg-0261 79 SouthUNITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 12 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, reck outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic highway? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? P~eeeiN S~eF~cem Unk~s Le~Than Signdieanl Commenb: 13.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. When specific projects are proposed, impacts to public services and facilities will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. Additionally, the City has adopted design guidelines within the development process, which requires development to meet certain design and aesthetic standards. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.57 Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57 Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Commen~: 14.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The General Plan EIR diagram of Areas of Sensitivity for Archaeologicel Resources (Figure 5-6) does identify the property as a potential sensitive \\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1%Depts%PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South%INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 13 archaeological site, although the text of the General Plan EIR recognizes that the survey leading the identification of sensitive sites may not accurately portray all cultural resources in the study area. However, much of this sits has been previously disturbed. This disturbance further reduces the likelihood of finding any cultural resources. Further, no budal locations have been identified on site, however more detailed analysis may be necessary to determine potential impacts. Mitigation Measures are identified below. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) Mitigation Measure 14.all Because the area of the proposed project has been identified as one with potential sensitive archeological resources, any future developments within the area will require detailed study and analysis. All new development will comply with AB 3180 ("Mitigation Monitoring Program") and report to the City on the completion of mitigation and resource protection measures required for each project. Further, future development will be required to comply with the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Guidelines in regards to the preservation or salvage of significant archaeological and paleontological sites discovered during construction activities. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physicel deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physicel effect on the Comments: 15.alh The proposed project is an action to razone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. When specific projects are proposed, impacts to utilities and service systems will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. These may include, but are not limited to impact fees, incorporation of recreation elements within the development, etc. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) %%TEMEC_FS101\VOL1 ~DeptS~PLANNINGtPDO%99-0261 79 South~INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 14 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality' of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major pedods of Califomia history or prahistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? I P~le~flnlly I I · Lees 'Than Significant U.lesI I hitigetmn i S' " NO ;.";'... -.~_ .__ Comments: 16.a The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The PDO is intended to prepare for future development that is consistent with the approved General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 16.b: The cumulative impacts from the project are considered less than significant because the site is proposed to be developed in a manner consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. All cumulative impacts from the land use and development scheme envisioned in the General Plans have been analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. Given the project's consistency with these documents, cumulative impacts must be considered as less than significant. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 16.c: No environmental impacts have been identified that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. (Source: 1,2 and 3) 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Eartier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. I Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. %%TEMEC_FS101\VOL1%D epts%PLANNING%PDO%99-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 15 Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the eadier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. Commen~: 17.a: The City of Temecula General Plan Environmentel Impact Report, copies of which are available at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Additionally, the Temecula Creek Traffic Impact Analysis, February 2000, copies of which are available at the City of Temecula Planning Department. 17.b: Cumulative impacts from all of the issues discussed above were addressed and mitigated to one degree or another in the General Plan, Specific Plan and respective EIR's. 17.c: Mitigation measures associated with the present project and analysis have been previously described and the measures will be implemented as part of the grading permit approval, issuance, or monitoring processes. SOURCES 2. 3. 4. 5. City of Temecula General Plan City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report City of Temecula Development Code Temecula Creek Traffic Impact Analysis, February 2000 Via Rio Temecula Road General Plan Link Deletion Study, September, 1999 ~TEMEC_FS101%VOL1 ~DeptS~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 16 Errata Sheet: 1. Section 6 all: "Additionally, it is important to notc it is anticipatcd that thc proposed projcct will gcncrate Ic3s than 2,000 evaragc daily trip3 (ADT)." "The existing zoning on the project would allow for development that could produce 10,755 average daily trips (ADT); whereas the proposed change of zone could produce projects that would generate 10,260 average daily trips (ADT). The proposed project will produce 495 fewer trips than projects development under the existing zoning." R:\P D O\99-0261 79 SOUth\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 17 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED R:XP D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Rzport.doc 13 EXHIBIT A LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT DATED JULY 20, 2000 R:\P D O\99~261 79 South\CC Staff Report.c[oc 14 July 18, 2000 & ASSOCIATES INC. Mr. Chip Swanson Vice President LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT 12625 High Bluff Drive, Suite 212 San Diego, CA 92130 Subject: Temecula Creek High Intensity Office Development Scenario Dear Mr. Swanson: The purpose of this letter is to compare the vehicle tdp generation associated with the current mixed use development concept for Temecula Creek to the estimated trip generation from an office development scenario. The mixed use development concept was analyzed by RKJK in the February 29, 2000 Traffic Impact Analysis report prepared for the Temecula Creek project. The mixed use project is assumed to be developed with 400 apartment dwelling units, 30,000 square feet of office and a total of 93,000 square feet of commercial retail. The amount of commercial retail represents a "worse case" assumption in terms of development within the village area of the project. The" office alternative is based upon a floor area ratio for office and professional uses oq would require a ~mbination of surface and subterranean parking areas. We anticipate that there would be some suppo~ retail uses in~rpomted into the project. Allowable uses would include mstaumn~deli, drag store, d~ cleaner, bank, hair salon, day~m, ~pies, flodst or other ~mpatible uses. We anticipate that approximately 5% of the G~ (71,221 s.f.) would be used for suppo~ retail uses. Trip generation data for both the mixed use project and office alternative are presented on the attached Table 1. The mixed use project exhibits lower inbound and outbound traffic flows in cempadson to the high intensity office alternative during both the morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the mixed use project generates less overall activity throughout the day ......... JUt. ~ 6 20011 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING · GIS · TRAFFIC/ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING 1601 Dove Street, Suite 290 · Newport Beach, CA 92660 ° Phone: (949) 474-0809 · Fax: (949) 474-0902 Mr. Chip Swanson Vice President LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT July 18, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this trip comparison, or require additional information, please don't hesitate to give me a call at (949) 474-0809 Ext. 204. Sincerely, RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. J0h ain AICP I JKsjf/11142 JN:1226-00-01 Attachment TABLE 1 MIXED USE TRIP GENERATION LAND USE Apartments Office Commercial Retail Subtotal Intemal Capture (10%) ITOTAL QUANTITY UNITS~ 400 DU 30.0 TSF 61.0 TSF 32.0 TSF IN PEAK HOUR AM PM Iout IN I 36 152 152 63 9 19 73 46 218 49 32 142 221 239 531 -22 -24 -53 199l 2151 4781 OUT DALLY 80 2,636 94 527 235 4,961 154 3,276 563 11,400 -56 -1,140 507~ 10,260~ PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ALTERNATIVE TRIP GENERATION LAND USE Office Support Retail tOTAL QUANTITY I UNITSt TSF AM IN 1,309 80 1,389 PEAK HOUR PM OUT IN 178 271 51 241 229 512 OUT 1,325 261 1,586 DALLY 9,813 5,480 15,293 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON LAND USE Mixed Use Project F>mfessional Office Alternative )IFFERENCE AM -1,19ol PEAK HOUR I PM OUT IN I OUT 229 512 1,586 -14~ -34~ -1,079 DALLY 10,260 15,293 -5,033 ~ DU = Dwelling Uni~ TSF = Thousand Square Feet J:~obsH2260001~r'GCOMP.xis]T 1 j:~kktables\kk10000~kk10814tb JN:1226-00-01 EXHIBIT B LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT DATED AUGUST 3, 2000 R:\P D O\99~)261 79 South\CC Staff Report.doe 15 RKJK :- &AS-PdX1ATES IN~ 'Mr. Chip Swanson LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT 12625 Frq;h Bluff ~ Suite212 Subject: Ternscala Creek Office Devdopment Scenario Dear Mr, Swanson: The puqx~se of this letter is to compare the vehicle trip generalfor assocjated with the current m;,,_-~_ use development 4xxtc4~ for TemecuJa Creek b~ the estimated trip generation from an Dice development scenario. The mixed use cevelapment concept wasanalyzedbyRKJKintheFebmary29,2000Traf~clmpadAnahlsismpo~tpmpared for the Temecula Creek project The mist use project is arened to be developed ~dth 400 apartment dwdlin9 un~L% 30,000 square feet d office a~d a tolal of 93,000 scF~are fee oi' cutut~erdal rural The amount of corninertial rmi represents a "worse case' assumption in terms ;( devebpment wimln the village area of the project. The ice slime is based upon a floor area ratio for office and professional uses 0'~'~12,207 square feet of building area. This would requb'e a co 'nbination of sulface 0.50. The apprcocimately 32,7 8cT8 pll)jec~ site is therefore assurfed to be developed' and sub'mrmneaa parking areas. We anUcq)ae that there would b~: some support retai uses incorpomtecl into the projecL Piowable uses would include restaurard/ddj, drug store, dry cleaner, bank, hair ion. daycare, copies, florid or other compatible uses. We ant~ titat approximately 9% of the GLA (65.341 s.f.) would be used for support Tdp gen~uG~n data for both the mixed use projed and office sirenmire am presented on the attache Table 1. The mixed use project exhibits lower ird:ound and outbound traffic flows in comparison tn the office altemalive during both the morning and evening peak hour. In addition. the mixed use projec~ generates less overall addvity throughouL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING · CI'~ * TRAFFiC/ACOUSTICAL Eh GINEERINC 1601 Dove Street, Suite 290 · Newpoet Beach, CA 92560 * Phone: [949) 474-08)9 · Fax; (949) 474-091;~ AUG--O4--B6 10,45 FROM,L,AN!)GRANT IDsEI543 461 LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT Augusta, 2000 Page 2 ff you have a~y Questions regarding this trip comparison. or require additiOnal informalion, please don't hesitate Io give a call at (949) 474-0809. RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CB'-JK:skifl 1142 JN;1226-00-O1 AUa~ment " ~'/~O~-~4'--F~"'fL~C FRON.LANDGRANT ZD,658 491 2169 PAGE TAIl,E1 :' TRIP GENERATION lAND USE ~emad Capa~ HO~) PEAK NOUR TN OUT IN OUT DAILY 38 1~2 1...2 80 2.636 63 9 19 94 527 73 46 218 235 4,961 49 32 142 154 3,276 221 2~ ' 531 5E~ 11.480 -22 ..24 -5) -56 -1,140 19gl 215 47~1 507 10,260 PRO~ OFFICE ALl I=mklATIVE TRIP GlriON YOT QUANTrFY UNITS' I~ I OUT IN I OU~,,~I OAILY ~.N1 TSF , _ 5,185 eool-sla -Imzl 800 2 10.755 '~ DU =DwellgUnib T'SF = ~SqUamFed .LMMabkalit410(Nddt~21b ,ea:lza~o~t ATTACHMENT NO. 10 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FROM CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER R:'~P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Slaff Report.doc 16 CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Denise Thomas, Associate Planner ~Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Traffic September 19, 2000 Temecula Creek Project - Trip Generation Comparison As requested by the City, the consultant has prepared trip generation comparison for the proposed project for two (2) alternatives. Alternative No. 1 is the existing zone of professional office. Alternative No. 2 is the proposed mixed use, which includes apartments, offices and commercial retail. Alternative No. 1 - Professional Office The 32.7 acre project site using a 0.50 FAR would represent approximately 712,000 square feet of building area. Using this building area, the project would generate 945 trips during the A.M. peak hour, 1,275 trips during the P.M. peak hour and 10,755 total daily trips. Alternative No. 2 - Mixed Use Under this scenario and using a 10 % reduction for internal capture, the project would generate 414 trips during the A.M. peak hour, 985 trips during the P.M. peak hour and 10,260 total daily trips. As demonstrated, the proposed mixed use alternative utilizing a 10% trip reduction for internal capture, would generate fewer trips than the professional office use for both A.M. and P.M. peak hours, and the total daily trips. All trip generation rates are from the 6th edition (1997), Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) handbook. ATTACHMENT NO. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING EXHIBITS R:~P D O\994)261 79 Sou~h\CC StaffR~port.doc 17 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0261 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 21,2000 VICINITY MAP \\TEMEC FS101\VOL1\DeptS',PLANNING\PDO\99-0261%261PA99 PDO PC.doc - 28 CITY OF TEMECULA :!~'~ PROJECT ~ SITE -/ EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) ZONE ROJE'~ CT ::- SITE ?~i ~0000000000000000( ,000~?~,~9000000000( ,OOC ,OOC EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - pROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) CASE NO. o pA99-0261 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 21, 2000 \\TEMEC FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\PDO\99-0261~261PA99 PDO PC.doc - 29 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT D . CURRENT GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP · , :, - EXHIBIT E PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP CASE NO. - PLANNING APPLICATION 99-037t PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JULY 19, 2000 \XTEMEC_FS101\VOLl%Depts,,pLANNiNGXG p A%pA99-037fiSTAFFRPT.PC.doc g EXHIBIT F BUILD-OUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AD~ WITH VIA RIO TEMECUi,~ RD. LEGEND: 14.7 = VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S) N 1226-e~4~11e TEMECULA MAR~:.:;-,LACE, Tenecta~ bi EXHIBIT G BUILD-OUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ADT) WITHOUT VIA RIO TEMECU~(t~ RD. LEGEND: 15.4 = VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S) le RKJK ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager September 26, 2000 To amend the sign standards in Chapters III and IV of the Old Town Specific Plan Prepared by: Patty Anders, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Approve the categorized exemption under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines 2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER III SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) BACKGROUND: Merchants in the Old Town area have requested the City Council and Planning Staff to consider a revision to the sign standards in the Old Town Specific Plan to allow merchants on side streets to have modified signage when the existing buildings are set back from the street and their visibility is limited. The goal is to help merchants on side streets increase their visibility while maintaining the character and intent of the Old Town Specific Plan sign standards. The result was modifications to Chapters III and IV of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) relative to monument signs and the associated cross-references. The item was reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board on September 11, 2000 and the Planning Commission on September20, 2000, both ofwhich support the proposed changes. Staff will provide a verbal report of the Planning commission's discussion. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: I - Draft Ordinance 2 - Planning Commission Resolution 3 - Staff Report dated September 20, 2000 Ords~2000- I ATTACHMENT 1 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE OrdsX2000- 2 ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER III SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter III, Section G, Sign Regulations, for the Old Town Specific Plan are hereby amended: A. Subsection 3 (c), the first paragraph is hereby amended to read as follows: "Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall provide a comprehensive sign plan. The comprehensive sign plan shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided. The Director may also require the following information:" B. Subsection 5. Prohibited Signs in Old Town. The first bullet item is hereby modified to read as follows: "Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of frontage on a single street and buildings with front yard setbacks often (10) feet or less". C. Subsection 6. Permitted Signs in Old Town. Add a new bullet at the beginning of this section to read as follows: "Mini-Monument Signs for lots with buildings that have actual front yards of more than ten (10) feet that were constructed prior to 1994." D. Subsection 7. (d) Sign Standards shall be modified to allow the provision of Mini- Monument signs. This section is hereby modified to read as follows: "d. Monument Signs - one of the following sign types may be permitted per site if the following requirements are met: Monument - A maximum of one double face sign if said street frontage is over 150 feet on any one street. The maximum square footage of a freestanding sign shall be 16 square feet. Height of sign shall not exceed six (6) feet above grade. Width shall not exceed four (4) feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12" high. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated. Internal illumination is prohibited. OrdsL2000- Mini-Monument - Maximum of one double face sign if said street frontage is less than 150 feet on any one street, if the building existed prior to 1994 and if the building is set back ten (10) feet or more from the street. The maximum sign area is six (6) square feet with a maximum height of four (4) feet. The sign may be placed in the front yard setback for increased visibility, but not within the public right-of-way. No illumination is allowed. Ira building has more than one tenant or building per lot, there shall only be one Mini-Monument allowed. If a sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel, railroad cart, etc. (as defined in Subsection 9.7,p.), the height may be increased. The architectural element must be reviewed and approved by the Old Town Local Review Board and the Director of Planning." E. Subsection 7 (h) Sign Standards shall be modified to insert the following sentence at the end of the existing paragraph: "Each tenant may have a projecting sign, however no tenant may have both a projecting sign and a Mini-Monument sign." as follows: The following amendments are typographical errors and should be amended to read Subsection 7 (n), in the first line, the word "year" should be replaced with "rear". Subsection 7. (o) the word "are" should be replaced with "area". G. Chapter 4 shall be amended to read as follows: Subsection A. 4 (e), add a new 7th bullet to read as follows: "Mini-Monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement to four feet." Subsection E. 2, Guideline 3 - Sign Color, revise the third bullet, first line to read as follows: "Limit colors to four on a single sign." Subsection G. 4 (c), add a sentence to the end of the existing paragraph which reads "Generic directional signs may be added to the existing street name poles provided the signs are approved by the applicable City Departments." Section 2, following findings: Findinqs. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan because it helps promote the revitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to enhance business opportunities. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing businesses with appropriate signage to help promote business opportunities in Old Town. C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. Section 3. Environmental Determination. These minor amendments to the sign ordinance concentrate on signage for buildings that were in existence prior to the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Approval of these modifications does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. As a result, the project is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). Ords~2000- 4 Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC CityClerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2000- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of September, 2000, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the ~ day of ,2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Ords~2000- 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Ords\2000- 6 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00- 0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE SIGN STANDARDS IN CHAPTERS III AND IV OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. 00-0350 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered this Application on September 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findinqs. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the Application, makes the following findings: The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan because it helps promote the revitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to enhance business opportunities. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing businesses with appropriate signage to help promote business opportunities in Old Town. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. Section 2. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the modifications to the sign standards contained in the Old Town Specific Plan as contained in Exhibits A and B, substantially in the form contained herein. OrdsX2000- 7 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of September, 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of September, 2000 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\Oldtown~Plan Amendments\CCstaffreport.doc 12 ATTACHMENT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 Ords~2000- 9 RECOMMENDATION: 1. 2. STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date: September 20,2000 Planning Application No. PA 00-0350 (Specific Plan Amendment) Prepared By: Patty Anders, Associate Planner The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00-0350 pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and ADOPT a Resolution entitled: ORIGINAL PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE SIGN STANDARDS IN CHAPTERS III AND IV OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. BACKGROUND Merchants in the Old Town area have requested the City Council and Planning Staff to consider a revision to the sign standards in the Old Town Specific Plan to allow merchants on side streets to have modified signage when the existing buildings are set back from the street and their visibility is limited. The goal is to help merchants on side streets increase their visibility while maintaining the character and intent of the Old Town Specific Plan sign standards. The result was modifications to Chapters III and IV of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) relative to monument signs and the associated cross-references. PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLANAMENDMENT The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will allow flexibility in the sign standards to increase visibility to merchants on the side streets in Old Town Temecula with existing buildings that are set back from the street. The monument sign regulations are being modified to allow two types of monument signs whereas currently there is only one type of monument sign type. The first is the existing monument sign that requires 150' of linear frontage, can be six feet in height and allows up to sixteen square feet of sign area. The second is the new "Mini- Monument" sign. Mini-Monument signs are allowed in the front setback area (outside of the public right-of-way), can be six square feet and up to four feet in height. This would replace the option of having a projecting sign, which is also permitted up to six square feet. A merchant can have either one Mini-Monument or one projecting sign, but not both. The Mini- Monument is required to be placed on a wooden structure. However, if the sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel or railroad cart as defined in Chapter 3, Subsection 9.7.p. (Outdoor Display) of the Old Town R:%Okitown~Plan Arnendments~PA00-0350 (Sign AmendrntS~STAFFRPT.PC.dOC 1 Specific Plan, the height of the sign may be increased. The Planning Director shall determine the height limit for the architectural element on a case-by-case basis. In order to obtain the increased height, the architectural element must be reviewed and approved by the Old Town Local Review Board and the Director of Planning. The Specific Plan amendment will also dadfy sign standards, correct some typographical errors and allow the number of sign colors to be increased from throe to four to allow more creative, unique sign designs. There is also a provision to allow genedc, diroction signs to be placed on the existing street name poles. At such time the location and design of the directional signs aro determined, the signs will be brought back to the Planning Commission for their roview. The most significant amendments to the sign standards aro as follows: Chapter III Section G, Sion Re,clulations (See Attachment 2. Existino Sl~ecffic Plan Pacles): A. Subsection 3 (c), page 111-48, paragraph is heroby amended to road as follows: 'Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall L~_L~.t: thc sizc and opproximotc Ioeation of all r, ign; to bc crcctcd on thc propcrty provide a comprehensive sign plan prior to. The comprehensive sign plan shall indicate the size, approximate location, color and material of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided. The Director may also require the following information:" Be Subsection 5. Prohibited Signs in Old Town, page 111-49, the first bullet item is heroby modified to road as follows: "Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of frontage or buildings with ~otbacks on a single street and buildings with front yard setbacks of ten (10) feet or eFeate; Ce Subsection 6. Permitted Signs in Old Town, page 111-49, add a new bullet at the beginning of this section to read as follows: "Mini-Monument Signs for lots with buildings that have actual front yards of more than ten (10) feet that were constructed prior to 1994." D. Subsection 7. (d) Sign Standards pages 111-51 and 111-52 shall be modified to allow the provision of Mini-Monument signs. This section is heroby modified to road as follows: "d. Monument Signs - one of the following sign types may be permid per site ff the following requirements are met: Monument - A maximum of one double face sign per street frontage if said stroet frontage is over 150 feet on any one street. The maximum squaro footage of a freestanding sign shall be 16 square feet. Height of sign shall not exceed six (6) feet above grade. VVidth shall not exceed four (4) feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12" high. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated. Internal illumination is prohibited. R:\Oldtown%Plan Arnendments%PA00-0350 (Sign AmendmIs~STAFFRPT.PC.doc 2 2. Mini-Monument - Maximum of one double face sign if said street frontage is less than 150 feat on any one street, ff the building existed prior to 1994 and if the building is set back ten (10) feet or more from the street. The maximum sign area is six (6) square feet with a maximum height of four f4) feet. The sign may be placed in the front yard setback for increased visibility, but not within the public right-of-way. No illumination is allowed. if a building has more than one tenant or building per lot, there shall only be one Mini-Monument allowed. If a sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel, railroad cart, etc. (as defined in Subsection 9. 7.p.), the height may be increased. The architectural element must be reviewed and appmved by the Old Town Local Review Board and the Director of Planning.' Chapter IV (See Attachment 3. Applicable Specific Plan Pa;es): E. Subsection A. 4 (e), page IV-4, add a new 7m bullet to read as follows: "Mini-Monument eigns located on smhffecturel features that exceed the standard height requirement to four feel" Subsection E. 2, Guideline 3- Sign Color, page IV-47, revise the third bullet, first line to read as follows: "Limit colors to th:_-.- fouron a single sign.' G. Subsection G. 4 (c), Street Name Pole Signs, page IV-69, modih/this paragraph to read as follows: "These signs will be simple wood construction similar to the existing wood signs currently located in Old Town. Old Town's logo may be incorporated into the street name placard or pole. Generic directional signs may be added to the existing street name poles or light poles, provided the signs are appreved by the applicable City Departments." ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION These minor amendments to the sign standards concentrate on signage for buildings that were in existence pdor to the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Any potential physicel impads to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. As a result, the project is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The proposed sign modifications are consistent with the General Plan and the intent of the Old Town Specific Plan because it helps promote the revitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to enhance business opportunities which in turn helps to revitalize Old Town. R:~Oldt~Mm~lan Amendments%PA00-0350 (Sign Amendrnts~STAFFRPT.PC.doc 3 SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The proposed sign amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan am intended to allow merchants on side streets to have modified sign standards due to their limited visibility while maintaining the character and intent of the Old Town Spedtic Plan sign standards. FINDINGS The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan because it helps promote the revitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to enhance business oppodunities. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing businesses with appropriate signage to help promote business opportunities in Old Town. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A - City Coundl Ordinance - Blue Page 8 Exhibit B - City Council Resolution - Blue Page 12 2. Chapter Ifi, Old Town Specific Plan Affected Pages - Blue Page 16 3. Chapter IV, Old Town Specific Plan Affected Pages - Blue Page 17 4. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 18 R:\Ok:ltow~%Plan Amendrnents~A00-0350 (Sign Ame~dmtS~STAFFRPT. PC.dOC 4 ATTACHMENT NO, 1 PC RESOLUTION NO, 2000- R:\Oldtown~Plan Amendments~PA00-0350 (Sign Amendmts~STAFFRPT.PC.doc 5 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00- 0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE SIGN STANDARDS IN CHAPTERS III AND IV OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. 00-0350 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered this Application on September 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the Application, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan because it helps promote the revitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to enhance business opportunities. 2. The proposed Spedtic Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing businesses with appropriate signage to help promote business opportunities in Old Town. 3. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. Section 2. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the modifications to the sign standards contained in the Old Town Specific Plan as contained in Exhibits A and B, substantially in the form contained herein. R:\Oldtown%Plan Arnendments%PA00-0350 (Sign Amendmta~STAFFRPT.PC.dOC 6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of September, 2000. Ron Guerdero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of September, 2000 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~Oldtown%Plan Amendments~A00-0350 (Sign Amendmts~TAfFRPT.PC.doc 7 Exhibit A CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE R:~Olcitown~Plan Amendrnents~PA00-O350 (Sign AmendmtS~STAFFRPT.PC.dOC 8 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 00- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUI_A, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER III SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING APPUCATION NO. 00-0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter III, Section G, Sign Regulations, for the Old Town Specific Plan are hereby amended: A. Subsection 3 (c), the first paragraph is hereby amended to read as follows: 'Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall provide a comprehensive sign plan. The comprehensive sign plan shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided. The Director may also require the following information:' B. Subsection 5. Prohibited Signs in Old Town. The first bullet item is hereby modified to read as follows: "Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of frontage on a single street and buildings with front yard setbacks of ten (10) feet or less'. C. Subsection 6. Permitted Signs in Old Town. Add a new bullet at the beginning of this section to read as follows: "Mini-Monument Signs for lots with buildings that have actual front yards of more than ten (10) feet that were constructed prior to 1994." D. Subsection 7. (d) Sign Standards shall be modified to allow the provision of Mini- Monument signs. This section is hereby modified to read as follows: "d. Monument Signs - one of the following sign types may be permitted per site if the following requirements are met: 1. Monument - A maximum of one double face sign if said street frontage is over 150 feet on any one street. The maximum square footage of a freestanding sign shall be 16 square feet. Height of sign shall not exceed six (6) feet above grade. Width shall not exceed four (4) feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12" high. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated. Intemal illumination is prohibited. 2. Mini-Monument - Maximum of one double face sign if said street frontage is less than 150 feet on any one street, if the building existed prior to 1994 and if the building is set back ten (10) feet or more from the street. The maximum sign area is six (6) square feet with a maximum height of four (4) feet. The sign may be placed in the front yard setback for increased visibility, but not within the public right-of-way. No illumination is R:\Oldtown~Plan Amendments%PA00-t~___r,t)_ (Sign AmendmtS%STAFFRPT.PC.doc 9 allowed. If a building has more than one tenant or building per lot, there shall only be one Mini-Monument allowed. If a sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel, railroad cart, etc. (as defined in Subsection 9.7.p.), the height may be increased. The architectural element must be reviewed and approved by the Old Town Local Review Board and the Director of Planning." E. Subsection 7 (h) Sign Standards shall be modified to insert the following sentence at the end of the existing paragraph: "Each tenant may have a projecting sign, however no tenant may have both a projecting sign and a Mini-Monument sign." as follows: The following amendments are typographical errors and should be amended to mad Subsection 7 (n), in the first line, the word "year should be replaced with Subsection 7. (o) the word "am" should be replaced with "area'. Section 2. following findings: Findinris. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Spedtic Plan because it helps promote the revitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to enhance business oppodunities. 2. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing businesses with appropriate signage to help promote business opportunities in Old Town. 3. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the histodc character of Old Town. Section 3. Environmental Determination. These minor amendments to the sign ordinance concentrate on signage for buildings that were in existence pdor to the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Approval of these modifications does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations forthe Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. As a result, the project is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. The City Clerk shall cortify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. R:\Oldtown~Plan Amendments%PA00-0350 (Sign AmendmtS~STAFFRPT,PC.dOC 10 Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Coundlmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Coundl of the City of Temecula this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting ofthe City Council on the26 day of September, 2000, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of ,2000 by the following roll cell vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:%Oldtown~Plan Armmdments~PA00-0350 (Sign Amendmts~STAFFRPT.PC.doC 11 EXHIBIT B CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION R:%Ok:ltovm%Plan Amefffiments~A00-0350 (Sign Arnexlrnts~STAFFRPT. PC.doc 12 EXHIBIT B RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPUCATION NO. PA00- 0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT), TO AMEND THE SIGN STANDARDS IN CHAPTER N OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PAO0-0350 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on September 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public headng as prescJ~bed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in suppod or opposition to this matter, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public headng pertaining to the Application on September 26, 2000, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the Application; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above redtations am true and correct and am hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. following findings: Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan because it helps promote the ravitalization of Old Town by assisting businesses to have adequate signage to help enhance business opportunities. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing businesses with appropriate signage to help promote business opportunities in Old Town. C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. R:~Oldtown~Plan Amendments~PA00-0350 (Sign Amendmts~STAFFRPT. PC .dOC 13 Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecula City Council hereby approves the Application to amend the Old Town Specific Plan sign standards in Chapter IV to read as follow: D. Subsection A. 4 (e), add a new 7th bullet to read as follows: "Mini-Monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement to four feet.' E. Subsection E. 2, Guideline 3 - Sign Color, revise the third bullet, first line to read as follows: "Limit colors to four on a single sign.' F. Subsection G. 4 (c), add a sentence to the end of the existing paragraph which reads "Generic directional signs may be added to the existing street name poles provided the signs are approved by the applicable City Departments.' Section 4. Environmental Determination. These minor amendments to the sign regulations concentrate on signage for buildings that were in existence pdor to the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. Approval of these modifications does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential physicel impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Repod for the City General Plan. As a result, the project is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~C)ldtovm~lan Amendments~A00-0350 (Sign AmendmtS~STAFFRPT.PC.doc 14 Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:M31dtowffiPtan Amendments~PA00-0350 (Sign Arnendmts~STAFFRpT.pC.doc 15 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CHAPTER III, OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN EXISTING PAGES R:\Oldtown;lan Amendments~PA00-0350 (Sign Ame~dmts~STAFFRPT. PC .dOC 16 SIGN REGULATIONS The purpose of the sign regnhtions is to provide the means for adequate identification of buildings and businesses by regulating and controlling the design, size, and location of all signs within the Slx~cific plan ar~ except the Highway Tourist Commercial District, Medium Density R~siclev~al District, High Density Residential District, and the Community Commercial District where the sign requirements of the Development Code shall apply. These regulations do not apply to service stations. The requirements of the Development Code shall apply for service stations. The intent of these regalaliens is to establish specific standards for all exterior signing that wffi ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the architectural quality of the Old Town environment as it may have appeared in the early 1900's. 1. Compliance Required No person shall erect, reerect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure or cause or permit the same to be done contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of these sign regulations. 2. Uncertainty Of Sign Regnhtions ff a situation arises that is not covered by these sign regulations or there is ambiguity as to these regulations or the type of permit required, the Director shall provide writran interpretation after consulting the Development Code. 3. General Sigu Standards The area of a wall sign or logo with individual letters shall be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. Planning and Building Departments review and appwval is required prior to the phcing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any sign within the Specific Plan anm, unless expressly exempted. Any project tlmt proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the prDperty at the tillle of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided. The Director may also require the foliowing information: Method of illumination; Sign materlal.q and colors; and Method of attachment. I11 - 48 City of Temecula DId Town Sneci~c Plan d. All permanent signs shall require a permit prior to erecting or attaching the sign. Exempt Signs · Historical markers Prohibited Si~,ns in Old Town · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of mad frontage or buildings with setbacks of 10' or greater Roof mounted signs Animated signs, including time and temperature displays Rotating, moving, emitting, or flashing signs Balloon signs Ambient air balloons Internally illumin~ signs including window locations Neon tube signs Window signs above the second story Paper, cloth, or plastic streams or bunting - except holiday decorations Formed plastic or injection molded signs Statues used for advertising Traffic sign replicas Vehicle signs Inte. mally illuminated awnings Backlit illuminat~l awnings Plywood Signs Signs mounted on railings, banisters, balusters or porch columns Four or more noll-governnlontal flags Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and not expressly "Permitted" in fhk Specific Plan Permitted Signs · · · · · · · · · · · · Wall Signs (business identification) Superg'mphics Building Name Signs Freestanding Signs Window Signs Under Canopy Signs Awning Signs Projecting Signs Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs Temporary Signs Flags, Non-governmental, 3 or less Accessory Signs City of Temecula OM Town Specific Plan III - 49 Sign Standards Business establishments having single frontage onto a public street or buildings with one building entrance are permitted a maximum total square footage equal to 1.5 square feet per linear front foot of business establishment. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage prescribed below. Business establishments having frontage onto two public streets are permitted a maximum total square footage equal to 1.5 square feet per linear front foot of business establishment along the primary street and 0.5 square feet per linear front foot of business establishment along the secondary street. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage prescribed below. a. Wall Signs Maximum of one square foot per linear front foot of business establishment. To be located not higher than the lowest of the following: 25 feet above grade; Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows; or Cornice line of the building. b. Supergraphi~ The purpose of allowing wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. Maximum size shall not exceed 60% of wall surface. c. Building Name Signs The purpose of allowing is building name signs is to allow the identification of buildings. Maximum size shall not exceed 10% of wall surface of the building. In the event that a building name advertises one or more businesses located within said building, the signage will not be considered a building name sign but will be included in total square footage permitted for that business or building. d. Monument Signs Maximum of one double face sign per street frontage ff said street frontage is over 150 feet. The maximum square footage of a freestanding sign shall be 16 square feet. Height of sign shall not exceed 6 feet above City of Temecula III - 51 Old Town Specific Plan gnde. Width shall not exceed 4 feet. Each tenant phcard shall not exceed 12' high. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated. Internal illumination is prohibited. Permanent Window Signs On ground level, coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible from the exterior of the building; on second level, coverage shall not exceed 30 percent per window. (No window signs are permitted above second level). Under Canopy Signs Permitted under a canopy, wof, covered walkway, or porch; maximum size of 3 square feet; minimum of 7' vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the boY. ore of the sign. Awning Signs On ground floor lBvel; 20 percent maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above; 10 percent maxlm~llll coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Internal illumination prohibited. h-ojectlng Signs Maximum size may not exceed 6 square feet and shall not extend more than 3 feet from the wall surface. No illumination allowed. Projecting signs Shall Only be attached to buildings, not W poles or other signs. Projecting signs may encroach inw the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet subject W the approval of the Director. A-Frame/Sandwich Board Sign One A-frame or sandwich board sign allowed per property for up to 12 days per month (i.e. on Friday, Saturday, Sunday). Maximum size of 3.5 feet high by 2 feet wide. No illumination allowed. Temporary Signs Temporary grand opening and special event signs are allowed for each business establishment on the exterior wall. Signs shall not be attached to any other freestanding clement (porch balustrade, garden wall, tree, monument sign, vehicle, etc.). Signs shall be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other durable material. Plastic or vinyl banner signs are not permitted. Neon oolorccLtday glow banner signs are prohibited. City of Temecula HI - 52 Old Town Specific Plan Hanging Signs Permitted under a canopy and parallel to the primary street; maxLmum size of 6 square; minimum of 7' vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Rear Facing Signs Where a building has paxking or pedestrian access at the year of a building, each business is permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 3 square feet in size. o. Interior Facing Signs Where a building has a courtyard or similar area that can not be viewed from the public right-of-way or paxking are, each business is permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 5 % of the total wall area of the business. Interior facing signs shall not be counted towards the overall total sign area permitted for the building. Outdoor Display The location of replicas of items that were commonly found in the turn of the century, such as covered wagons, wagon wheels, railroad carts, and livestock, located out of the public right-of-way. DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE BONUSES In order to achieve the type and cplality of development and revitalization envisioned for the Specific Plan area, certain development incentive bonuses have been established to encourage developers and propen~J owners to participate in the various programs described below. Incentive bunuses may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Commission or City Counei_ 1 and nothing contained herein shall obligate the City to pwvide any of the following bonuses. 1. Pedestrian Amcnlties Incentive a. Purpose Throughout the Specific Plan area it is desirable to encourage pedestrian oriented spaces within individual commercial building sites such as plazas, courtyards, and seating areas. Such features not only make the pedestrian environment more pleasant but they also add significantly to the overall visual quality of the pa.~cular commercial project. City of Temecula III - 54 Old-Town Specific Plan ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CHAPTER IV, OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN EXISTING PAGES R:~Oldto~m~Plan Amenclrnents%PA00-0350 (Sign Amendmts%STAFFRPT.PC,doc 17 What is a Level One Project? Level One projects do not require OTLRB review and are regarded as a minor alteration to an existing property or the conswuction of an individual house. Plans for development projects which the Planning Director (or his designee) feels may be "minor" or "incidental" will be submitted for a "staff onlv" review. Asstuning the design is appropriate, and in cortformance with these design guidelines, the development proposal is proved administratively. Typical Level One projects include, but are not Limited to: · · · · · interior changes or alterations; re-landscaping around existing structure; re-roofing; demolition to non historic structures; single family residence (new construction, additions, remodeling); new sign face into existing frame or "can" hardware single signs under 12 square feet cumulative exterior modifications to a non-residential buil- ding when less. than 25% of -*he facade is affected; and repain~ng. What is a Level Two Project? Level Two projects are generally regarded as developments having the potential for significant aesthetic impacts on the surrounding area. As a result, Level Two projects require a OTLRB review end recommendation prior to the Director's or Planning Commission's action. Typically Level Two Projects include, but are not limited to: multi-farr~ly residential projects; new commercial, office, or residential projects; cumulative exterior architectural modifications to an exis- ting commercial, office or residential building when over 25% of the facade is affecte0; demolition of a historic structure; redevelopment to a historic sWucture; signs over 12 square feet;, a~,d removal of an oak tree. IV - 4 City Of Terae~la C)ltl Ttrrtm ~n~ci~c Plan Guideline 3 - Sign Color Sign colors and materials should be elements that were available in the 1890'5. See the color palette available at the City Planning Depa~i,,,ent. Colors should be selected to contribute to legibility and design integrity. Even the most carefully thought out sign may be unat- tractive and a poor communicator because of poor color selection. Use significant contrast between the background and letter or symbol colors. If there is little contrast between the brighmess or hue of the message of a sign and its background, it will be dif- tictat to read. Limit colors to three on a single sign. Too many colors ovenvhpl~ the basic function of communication. The colors compete with content for the viewer's attention. Limited use of the accent colors can increase legibility, while large areas of com- peting colors tend to confuse and ,|i~turb. Vertical or horizontal wooden signs can be effectively utiliTed in a variety of different ways on windows, building surfaces or as accent bands. A wooden wall sign can be painted or stained and sealed for a more natural look, depending upon the appearance of the surrounding structures. Lettering can consist of metal or raised wood and when placed within a sign band, will serve to unify the building facade. Carved or sandblasted wood signs are also appropriate. Metal sign panels can utilize raised lettering on metal bands. Printing and lettering can also be applied directly to a flat metal sign band with letters consisting of wood, acrylic or metal. City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan IV - 47 c. Street Name Pole Signs These signs will be simple wood construction similar to the existing wood signs currently located in Old Town. Old Town's logo may be incorporated into the street name placard or pole. L' ,Front St. STREET SIGN MATCHING RANCHO CALIFORNIA WOODEN b"rYLE WITH COWBOY LOGO City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan IV - 69 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 VICINITY MAP R:~Oldtown~Plan Amendments~PA00-0350 (Sign A~%STAFFRPT, PC,doc 18 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.00 -0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 20, 2000 R:\Oldtown~Plan Amenclments%PA00-0350 (Sign Amendmti~STAFFRPT.PC.doc 19 ITEM 10 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council · ;E;~usan VV. Jones ity Clerk/Director of Support Services September 26, 2000 Discussion of Amending Growth Management Councilman Pratt) Program (requested by RECOMMENDATION: Consider the recommendations of Councilman Pratt to amend Section 2(B)1 of the Growth Management Program concerning establishing project densities. BACKGROUND: Councilman Pratt requested the City Council consider amending Growth Management Program point 2(B)1. It reads as follows: Direct the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in each density category. The Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides onsite or community amenities. ATTACHMENT: For your information, the Growth Management Program Action Plan, as adopted by the City Council on March 21,2000 and portions of the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan are attached. R:agenda reports/growth management program Growth Management Program Action Plan As Adopted by the City Council on March 21, 2000 This Action Plan is intended to serve as the City Council's policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures for the City of Temecula. Each development project shall be studied by Staff, the Planning Commission and City Council in light of the concerns expressed in this Plan and its action programs. Each project shall be considered on its own merit and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws and under the City's General Plan and zoning ordinances. Inter-Agency Coordination A. Engage actively in the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) 1. Appoint Council representatives to monitor the following three (3) Advisory Committees: a. Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) - Ron Roberts. b. General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) - Jeff Comerchero c. Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) - Mike Naggar 2. Provide monthly committee reports to the City Council regarding the status of the respective committees the second meeting of each month. Staff should also participate and summarize meetings to assist the Council representatives. 3. Dedicate staff resources to monitor the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) process. a. Create Senior Management Analyst position dedicated to the Riverside County Integrated Plan. - Steve Brown b. Hire Project Consultant to completely interface and represent the City of Temecula's interests in every facet of the RCIP. - Sandra Massa-Lavitt 4. Encourage community participation. a. Provide quarterly publications informing our citizens of the progress of the RCIP. Included in the budget for 2000-2001; a community wide newsletter is planned following the April 27th workshop. b. Provide updated information on the City's web site regarding the City and County regional planning efforts. c. Provide news releases and other information regarding various public meetings related to the RCIP process. Assist the County in distributing printed materials to any community. d. Conduct a citizen survey to determine the community's perspective on growth related, as well as, other municipal issues. The survey questions will be balanced and objective and will be approved by the City Council prior to distribution. 5. Hold quarterly City Council workshops with County staff to gauge the progress of the RCIP. 6. Deny general plan amendments, change of zones, specific plan amendments, or specific plans within the City that result in increased traffic levels greater than Level of Service "D" at buildout. It is recommended that the City formally request that the County also adopt this proposed policy. Proposed land use intensities outside of the City boundaries must not adversely affect Temecula's quality of life from a traffic or environmental standpoint or the City will consider litigation. Projects with Specific Plan zoning that are consistent with the underlying General Plan densities may proceed. 7. Analyze the circulation system impacts as they relate to proposed land use changes along the 79 North Winchester Corridor and the 79 South Corridor. Traffic modeling shall be performed for any changes as part of the Riverside County Integrated Plan process. The City shall verity the results of modeling. Advocate the following policies throughout the RCIP process: a. Address public transportation as it relates to our freeways and connections to urban areas. b. Phase and fund infrastructure to keep pace with proposed development projects. c. Preserve significant amounts of land outside of the urban areas as open space. d. Establish urban growth boundaries for Temecula and other communities within the RCIP Planning Area. e. Establish greenbelts and open spaces around communities. B. Collaborate with the Pechanga Band of Luise~o Indians. 1. Cooperate regarding infrastructure improvements for the betterment of the community. 2. Support the Tribe's efforts to promote self-reliance for the reservation while promoting and preserving Temecula's quality of life. C. Collaborate with other agencies. 1. Take a strong position against proposed recreational improvements on the Diamond Lake Reservoir unless appropriate traffic mitigation and phasing measures are a condition of approval for those improvements. 2. Redirect Urban Development to Urban Areas A. Focused Review of City/County General Plan Opportunities. 1. Form a City Council General Plan Sub-Committee - Jeff Comerchero and Mike Naggar 2. The Sub-Committee will work with the staff and advisory committee (if an advisory committee is appointed by the Council) to address the following General Plan issues: a. Redistribution of land uses. b. Cluster densities related to Specific Plans. c. Review multi-family housing issues throughout the City. d. Evaluate opportunities for open space. e. Update the Circulation Element f. Consider other areas as necessary. g. Evaluate the total number of building permits that may be issued annually to projects that are not covered by a development agreement or a vesting map. B. City Development Project Review Process 1. Direct the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in each density category. The Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides onsite or community amenities. 3. Preserve Open Space to Create Buffers and Protect Agriculture and Valuable Habitat Areas A. Acquire vital open space and resource areas. 1. Evaluate a DIF component for the preservation of open space. Consider feasibility of a ¼ cent sales tax ballot measure for the acquisition and preservation of open space. 2. Condition Specific Plans to preserve a significant amount of area for open space. 3. Maintain large parcel sizes in rural areas. Parcel sizes should increase the greater the distance from urban core areas. Encourage down zoning and parcel merging to maintain large rural lot sizes. 4. Apply for and utilize State Bond Funds (e.g. Propositions 12 and 13) and other grant sources to acquire and preserve open space. 5. Explore potential tax advantages for developers interested in selling land for open space and/or encouraging continued agricultural use. 6. Complete an analysis to the amount of open space remaining in the City and determine the costs per acre, acquisition priority, and implement acquisition funding strategy. 4. Traffic Circulation System Improvements A. Ensure that infrastructure in constructed ahead of new development. 1. Implement the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This will include construction of freeway overcrossings, bridge crossings, aderial street improvements, etc., as outlined in the City Capital Improvement Plan. This is a 5- year planning and budget document that is reviewed and adopted each year. 2. Implement Category 1 and 2 street striping and paving improvements. 3. Pursue Measure A and discretionary funds for regional traffic improvement projects. a. Involve CETAP representative. b. Utilize Southwest Riverside Coalition to position region for funding allocation opportunities. 4. Work with other jurisdictions to establish programs and funding sources for construction of required traffic improvements. a. Maximize infrastructure dollars by teaming with other local jurisdictions, particularly the City of Murrieta and the Pechanga Tribe. b. Establish a regional Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for construction of regional circulation improvements and work with the City of Murrieta to build a consensus on proposed traffic projects. c. Work with the County to ensure that County development impact fees collected in this area are spent in the southwest area of Riverside County. B. Work with CaI-Trans to develop regional improvements to circulation system. 1. Determine how the RCIP and CETAP will mitigate and address the impact that future growth will have on the 1-15 and 1-215 freeway system. 2. Continue to pressure the State to fund new highway and freeway construction. 3. Analyze feasibility to realigning SR-7g North between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Interstate 215115 and making that portion of Winchester Road a city- controlled street. C. Continue to condition new development to ensure that infrastructure is constructed in conjunction with development impacts. 1. Require comprehensive traffic studies for project specific and regional impacts, a, Identify thresholds/criteria to require traffic studies. 2. Require independent traffic analysis, when appropriate on all proposed development projects. This independent analysis would be paid for by the developer but controlled and administered by the City, 3. Require that phased traffic improvements be constructed prior to projected impacts of development. 4. Re-evaluate DIF fees to ensure that appropriate mitigation fees are being charged and the timing of the DIF fees are appropriately collected. The Development Impact Fees should be reviewed on an annual basis. 5. Complete traffic counts on an ongoing basis at major intersections during peak times to ensure that Levels of Service remain at "D" or better. 5..Maximize Existing Transportation Network Efficiency A. Enhance traffic signal and roadway system operations. 1. Hire a traffic signal technician specifically dedicated only to improving the operation of all traffic signals. (this has been done.) 2. Monitor and check traffic signals proactively for coordination and efficiency on a daily basis. 3. Work with CalTrans on traffic signals within the State's right of way. 4. Provide traffic count information to local employers to assist them in scheduling shift changes and deliveries during peak traffic periods where possible. B. Identify and Expand Public Transit Opportunities. 1. Work with outside agencies to identify and determine feasibility of external public transit options. a. Establish Mag Lev or High Speed Rail. b. Expand Metrolink. c. Provide High Speed Express Buses. d. Consider other transit opportunities. 2. Identify and determine feasibility of internal public transit options, working with outside agencies, as appropriate, including: a. Expand Bus Program in coordination with RTA. b. Acquire alternate fuel vehicles such as electric fuel cell or natural gas (example: electric trolley) where appropriate, through working with transportation agencies. c. Provide direction to staff regarding an electric trolley system. d. Explore the option to integrate the RTA bus system with the school district system to achieve economies of scale and avoid duplication of services. e. Establish a Dial-a-Ride/Smart Shuttle. f. Support a program to provide bus passes to students and the elderly. Support could be in the form of either a direct or partial subsidy to the transit providers. g, Provide Fixed Rail - Monorail - Light Rail. h. Establish a shuttle system to move employees from the west side of the freeway to commercial areas/restaurants within the City. i. Support vanpools for major employers in the Temecula area and support efforts to facilitate ride sharing. 3. Identify Funding Sources for Public Transit options. 4. Develop clean fuel facilities and infrastructure to support new technologies in clean fuel development. ADMINISTRATION The Growth Management Program Action Plan will be annually reviewed by the City Council. Land Use Element Policy 4.5 Policy 4.6 Policy 4.7 Work with the Riverside County Flood Control District and other responsible agencies on the design of the flood control project for Muftieta Creek, Temeeula Creek, Pechanga Creek, and other waterways in the City. Consider alternative flood control methods to reduce capital and maintenance costs and provide recreational and open space opportunities. Conserve the resources of Pechanga, Temecula and Murrieta Creeks through appropriate densities of development, setbacks, landscaping and site design of surrounding pwjects. · Goal 5 A land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of Wansportation, including transit, bicycling, and walking. Discussion Future levels of traffic congestion within the community will be influenced by the land use pattern. The level of congestion can affect the convenience of walking biking, using a shuttle or bus service, or a fixed rail system that links Temecula to other communities. The architecture, landscape design, and site planning of projects should emphasize a pedestrian orientation and convenient access between uses, to support alternative transit methods. Policy 5.1 Include in the Development Code and through other ordinances a package of incentives to encourage development to include: 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Additional active parkland Development of parkland and trails Preservation of historic buildings or sites Additional open space Preservation and enhancement of natural habitat Additional public or community facilities Additional or improved public spaces or plazas for community use. Additional amenities in multifamily developments Transit facilities and/or additional right-of-way along future transit corridors. Housing that meets the needs of very low and low income households. Provision of cultural facilities. Policy 5.2 Require the provision of pedestrian and bicycle linkages from residential areas to open space/recreation facilities, commercial and employment centers. TSI-0~:IP-t.ND.USE · Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-12 CITY OF ~.~Vf!~C~ L~ Use Element Policy ~3 Policy S.4 Policy 5.5 Policy 5.6 Policy S.7 Policy Policy 5.9 Policy 5.10 Policy 5.11 Encourage variety in the design of sidewalks and trails with respect to alignment and surface materials to provide a convenient and enjoyable experience for the users. Provide grade separated bike paths along major arterials where feasible. Ensure that non-grade separated bike paths are designed for safety. Designate .Village Centers on the Land Use Plan to provide areas within the community that are'urban in character, contain a mixture of compatible uses, and are designed to reduce or eliminate the need for the automobile in travelling to or within Village Centers. Encourage higher density residential, mixed use development, and supporting public and community facilities within Village Centers. Establish design guidelines, development standards, and incentive programs for uses within Village Centers. Develop a plan to link Village Centers by trails and potential transit systems including bus, shuttle and light rail. Ensure that the architecture, landscape design, and site planning within Village Centers emphasizes a pedestrian scale and safe and convenient access between uses. Ensure that adequate public gathering areas or plazas are incorporated within Village Centers to allow for social interaction and community activities. Discourage the development 9f strip commercial centers that increase auto- dependency. Goal 6 A Plan for Old Town Temecula that enhances economic viability, preserves historic structures, addresses parking and public improvement needs, and establishes design standards to enhance and maintain the character and economic viability of Old Town. Policy 6.1 Policy6.2 Prepare a Specific Plan for Old Town, including any transition or expansion areas, to preserve and enhance the historic character, economic viability, and address community facility and service needs in the area. Require the preservation and reuse of historic buildings in and around the Old Town area. TF, M-01~26p-L.ND.L~ · Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-13 C:~TY (:)F TE]Vf~C~ Land Use Elera~nt Table 2-6 Environmental Study Area Land Use Comparison Between Existing Uses (Winter 1991) Land Use and General Plan Land Uses Existing Land Use Conditions Pinn2 Change in Dwellin~ Change in Units Acres n m (31 ¢)' cu ' 6.tX>l ~2t:. s 8,.~23 du. · :0 ."c (:= t.~'i: 14(; tc (:..,..- c,~?.:. A~:.,.:: :'.::'u~c:t~%: ='~ ~!" :.6(i 1:~ ~.h-: i.:: 'hilal I(il tic .492 nc 4i)1 tic l:blsed on probable lcvcl o! development - target dc~silyAntensily. HilLside/Low includes HHlsidc, VeI? low and Low General Plan desiFtions. Low/Medium refers to ~ Mc~um and Medium Oenend Pl~ desigaa~ons. High Density is High Ocncral Plan designation. ' Includes H~ghway,,Tourist Commerclad and Service CommeTc~n] General Plan Desigaa~ons. A. Land Use Designations Land use designations define the amount, type and nature of development that is 'allowed in a given location on the Lani:l Use Plan. While terms like "residential", "commercial", 'and "industrial" are generally understood, State General Plan law requires a clear and concise description of the land use designations or categories shown on the Land Use Plan. In addition, population and intensity standards must be specified in accordance with State General Plan law. Based upon the land use designations of the General Plan, specific zoning districts will be established in the Development Code. There may be one or more zoning districts for each land use designation. The Development Code will contain the detailed regulations and requirements for permitted uses and development standards to implement the goals and policies of the Land Use Element. TEM-01~O2GP-LND.USE · Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-21 C~'~ OF ~,~~ Land Use Element 1. Residenlial Designations Each of the residential use categories includes a range of allowable densities. The maximum density defines the maximum number of units per net acre at which development can occur within a given area. Net acre is defined as the gross project or lot area, less that portion of the site to be used for the following: arterial, major, secondary and collector roads; and the floodway portion of a flood plain. Determination of precise density, development location, and lot coverage on any residential property is a function of: Opportunities and constraints presented by natural, cultural or scenic features; Policies and implementation programs of the General Plan intended to maximize public safety; achieve high quality site planning and design; provide sufficient levels of public service; retain significant natural resources; eusurc compatibility between uses; and encourage development of Village Centers. Building and development standards contained in the Development Cede, pubic works standards, and other regulations and ordinances. Future residential development is expected to occur at the target level of density stated in Table 2-7 for each residential designation. Development at a density between the target and maximum level may only occur for the Hillside, Very Low, Low and Low Medium designations, at the discretion of the Planning Commission/City Council in exchange for special public benefits (as identified in Policy 5.1). The amenities or public benefits provided are intended to satis~ a need over and above the minimum requirements of the General Plan and other city policies and regulations. It is assumed that some residential development will occur below the target level of density and some development will occur above the target level based on the provision of public amenities or benefits. For purposes of analyzing the impacts of the General Plan, the target level of density for the above identified designations is assumed. A target level of density is not established for the Medium and High designations so as not to preclude or discourage the development of affordable housing. However, for purposes of analyzing the impacts of the General Plan, a probable level of development within the Medium and High designations is assumed. T~v$-0~02GP-.Lt~.USE · Dam: November 9, 1993 hgc 2-22 CITY OF TEMECULA Land Use Element Table 2-7 Development Intensity/Density Standards Land Use Designation Target Intensity/ Density2 Range of Development Intensity/Densitya DW~I J -ING UN/TS/ACKE 0 - .I DU/AC MAX .2 - .4 DU]AC MAX 5 - 2 DU/AC MAX 3 - 6 DU/AC MAX 7 - 12 DU/AC MAX 13 - 20 DU/AC MAX FLOOR AREA RATIO .20 - .~0 FAR .25 - 1.0 FAR .2~ - 1.0 FAR .2~ - 1.~ FAR .30-1.0 FAR 30 - 1.~ FAR .20- .70 FAR IIE~IDENTIAL DW~LING UNITS/ACRE Hillside .1 Very Low 3 Low Low Medium Medium 95 High 16.~ NON-RESIDENT/AL FLOOR AREA RATIO Neighborhood Commercial CommBIIity Commercial 30 Highway/Tourist Commercial 30 Service Commercial 30 Officc .50 Busincss Park Public/Institutional RanBe of a]]owable leveJ of development eu incSviclual parcels of laud, ~umed ovanil leveJ of development Cily-widt Since the developmere! which has occu~ed to dal~ has not reached the maximum allowed level of density or imensiPj, future development Ls expected to be le=s than tile Residential uses arc intended to be the principal and dominant use within each of the residential designations. Other uses such as public facilities/utilities, churches, schools, agriculture, community care and family day care facilities (as defined in the California Health and Safety Code), which arc determined to bc compatible with residential areas may also be allowed in accordance with the Development Code. The Land Use Plan provides for six residential designations as defined below. a. Hilkide Residential (0 - .1 Dwelling Unit per Acre Maximum) The Hillside Residential category is intended to provide for the development of very low density housing in areas that are best suited for open space or have severe constraints for development, such as steep hillsides with slopes over twenty-five percent, limited access and public services, fire hazards and other environmental concerns. The typical lot size for the Hillside Residential designation is 10 acres with one dwelling unit permitted per lot, however, clustering of development may be appropriate to minimize grading requirements and impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. TEM-01~02GP-L,hD.USE * Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-23 CITY OF TEMECUI.A Land Use Element b. Very Low/Rural Density Residential (~ - .4 Dwenlng Units per Aere The Very Low Density designation is intended to provide for the development of single family detached homes on large lots with a rural ranchette character of development. This designation is also consistent with large lot residences that keep homes and other animals, or utilize a portion of the land for agricultural production. Typical lot sizes are 2.5 acres, however, clustering of development may be appropria~ to minimize grading' requirements and impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. c. Low Density Residential (.5 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre Maximum) The Low Density designation is intended to provide for the development of single family detached homes on larger lots with a custom character of development. Typical lots size may be .5 to 2.0 acres, however, clustering of development may be appropriate to minimize grading requirements and impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. d. Low Medium Density Residential (3 - 6 Dwelling Units per Acre Maximum) The Low Medium Density designation is intended to pwvide for typical single-family neighborhoods. The range of housing types includes single family detached, single family zero lot line, patio homes and duplexes. Congregate care facilities could be approved as a conditional use in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. e. Medium Density Residential (7 - 12 Dwelling Units per Acre Maximum) The Medium Dcnsity Residential designation is intcnded to providc for thc devclopmcnt of attached. and .dctachcd residcntial dcvclopmcnt. Typical housing types may include singlc family zero lot linc, patio homes, duplexes, townhouses, and multi-family gardcn apartmcnts. Congxcgate care facilities could bc appwvcd as a conditional use in accordance with thc provisions of the Development Code. f. Higher Density Residential (13 - 20 Dwelling Units per Acre Maximum) The High Density designation is intended to pwvide for the development of attached residential developments. Typical housing types include multi- family or garden apartments. Congregate care facilities could be approved as a conditional use in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. Increases in the density for congregate care may be allowed under special provisions of the Development Code. These residential designations allow for a wide range of housing types as illnstrated below in Figure 2-2. The housing types that may be built within each General Plan residential designation is shown in Table 2-8. TEM-01~02~p. LND.t,$I~, Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-2~ CITY OF TEMECUI.,A Land Use Element Figure 2-2 Description of Housing Types Shagie F-,,~ly Detached .Onebousepeflm · Each hom~ incSvidud]y owned · ConventSoul Buik~ng SetbarJ~ from Final, ReazandSit~Pmpenyaines · 'l~/ml D.a~ity up so 6 o~elliag unit, pez aot~. 'l~lcal Single Farofly Detached Single-Family Detached Narrow Zero Lot Line Single Family Detached Single-Family--Zero Lot Line Wide & Shallow Single Family Detached TEM-01~02GP-LND.U~i * Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-25 CITY OF TE~VlECULA Land Use Element Figure 2-2 Description of Housing Types (Continued) Single F,.,,d~. · patio Homes .Olaehomepuka ,Eachhouse~llyowued · Flexable buik~g m~bacJa, building alentatkm andlot~zm · Emphasis m aretinS ptdms and pafi~s bough theus~off__-~andso~ · Sometimu · tlevelolanut ineludem commtm open spacea owned by all tmidmm untk, t · home owners a.m~iation. · ~uical Dmsiti~ ruge farm 5 ~o 8 6welling uniu per an~m Patio Home Cluster Single-Family Patio Duplex · One unh pet ' · Single Ownmhip of refit mad lot · .~epam2 ~at and tide yard let earl unit ,AComm~mV&ilb~mmiu · 'l~ical Demitiu my raage f. mm 6 to 10 dwelling uiU I~t aae ·/f Duplex I~ ate wide enough, nv~g in ptagu i~ combination with ~raight-ia paizu ate ~eoumged to vary the sitter s~me. Dup/ex Duplex Duplex with swing-in garage TEM~I~02GP-LND.USE ' Date: November 9, 1993 Page 2-26 ~TY OF TE~ECULA Land Use Element Figure 2-2 Description of Housing Types (Continued) Atts~k,d ~ Family - Townhouse · A housing style vAth each ~t h~ng ~ s~n and ~ly a~ ~ ~ ~in ~ mmmon ~lls · ~ ~t ~ I~ may ~ ~lly ~ · Us~ly ~d~ ~m~ ~ s~ ~ ~ a Home ~ ~ · ~ ~ my m~ ~m 8 to 12 ~el~g ~ ~ s~e Townhome Townhouse Multlpfa F,.ndty (Gard~.n Units) · Units grouped within buildings whi~ are usually two to four stories in height · Typical Densities may range form 12 to 20 dwelling units pe~ acre facilities are landscaFed and maintained by the overall ptoperP/owners a.uociali~ Garden Apartments Multiple-Family/Garden Apartment TEM.OI~aGp-t.ND.USE · Date: November 9, 1993 PaSe 2-27 ITEM 11 DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER ,~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Susan W. Jones, City Clerk September 26, 2000 Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate Voting Delegate for the Annual Congress of Cities, December 5-9, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: To designate a voting representative and an alternate. BACKGROUND: This year's National League of Cities' Annual Conference is scheduled December 5-9, 2000, at the Congress of Cities in Boston, Massachusetts. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Each member City is asked to designate a voting delegate and an alternate. Each city is entitled to cast from one to 20 votes, depending upon the city's population. The City of Temecula is designated two votes. If it is not possible for a member of the City Council to be present, the Council may designate a city official that will be attending the conference. Attached is the memorandum from Donald J. Borut, Executive Director of the National League of Cities, which further elaborates on the voting procedures. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Memorandum from Donald J. Borut, Executive Director, National League of Cities National League of Cities 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20094-1763 202-626-3000 Fax: 202 626 3043 Internet: w',,~.nlc.org 2000 Officers President Bob Knight Mayor, Wichda, Kansas First Vice President Dennis W Archer Mayor, Detroit, Michigan Secord Vice President Karen J Anderson Mayo~ Minnetenka, Minnesota immediate Past President Clarence E Anthony Mayor, South Bay. Florida Executive Director Donald J. Borut August 17, 2000 MEMORANDUlVl To: From: Subject: City Clerks of Direct Member Citie December 5-9, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts DUE: OCTOBER 13, 2000 The National League of Cities' Annual Business Meeting will be held at 2:15 p.m. on Saturday, December 9, 2000, at the Congress of Cities in Boston, Massachusetts. Under the Bylaws of the National League of Cities, each direct member city is entitled to cast from one to 20 votes, depending upon the city' s population, through its designated voting delegate at the Annual Business Meeting. The table on the reverse side of this memorandum shows the breakdown of votes by population categories. To be eligible to cast a city's vote(s), each voting delegate and alternate voting delegate must be designated by the city using the attached credentials form which will be forwarded to NLC's Credentials Committee. NLC's Bylaws expressly prohibit voting by proxy. Thus, the designated voting delegate(s) must be present at the Annual Business Meeting to cast the city' s vote(s). In mid November, NLC will send a special edition of the Policy Informer summarizing proposed National Municipal Policy amendments and proposed resolutions. This information should be shared with your voting delegation. To establish your city's credentials and facilitate preparation of your voting delegate(s) for the Congress of Cities, we ask that you return the completed form to NLC on or before October 13, 2000. Please follow the instructions prope~y for filing out the form. A pre-addressed envelope is attached. If you have any questions, please contact Lesley-Ann Rennie at (202) 626-3176. Enclosure NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES ANNUAL CONGRESS OF CITIES Number of Votes - Direct Member Cities Article IV, Section 2 of NLC's Bylaws specifies as follows the number of votes which each member city of the National League of Cities is entitled to cast at the Annual Congress of Cities: Under 50,000 50,000 - 99,999 100,000 - 199,999 200,000 - 299,999 300,000 - 399,999 400,000 - 499,999 500,000 - 599,000 600,000 - 699,000 700,000 - 799,000 800,000 - 899,000 900,000 and above 1 vote 2 votes 4 votes 6 votes 8 votes 10 votes 12 votes 14 votes 16 votes 18 votes 20 votes Note: Member cities are required by the Bylaws to cast unanimous votes. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~' September 26, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enfomement and miscellaneous activity occurring during August of 2000. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to thirty "priority one" calls for service dudng the month of August, with an average response time of approximately 5.4 minutes. A total of 1,274 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of August, the Temecula Police Department's storefront served a total of 326 customers. Fingerpdnting services for this month showed 127 prints taken (up from eighty-three last month), thirty-nine people filed police reports, twenty-four people had citations signed off, nine oversized vehicle permits and one solicitor's permit was issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. Officer Fanene conducted nine residential security visits and twenty-one business secudty visits during the month. He conducted forty-four visits to businesses for crime follow up information. Fanene also conducted two "stranger danger" presentations. Officer Fanerie completed his article for the September edition of the Valley Business Journal called "Business Burglary." The POP Team of Officers John Anderson and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Cdme Free Multi Housing" project. The officers are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes who are continuing with the program. Programs conducted this month included Old Town patrols. As a result of this program, ten citations were issued, ten misdemeanor arrests and one felony arrest was made. The team also worked during the "Hot Summer Nights" and reported that there were no problems encountered. A new program was started this month called "Creeksweep." This program focused on conducting foot patrols in the creek bed areas of the City. As a result of this program three misdemeanor arrests were made and one citation was issued. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 This was also the fourth month that the Old Town Storefront was operational. This storefront has served as an office for the POP team and has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served fifty-nine customers, thirteen fingerprints were taken, one report was written and three oversize vehicle permits were issued. The traffic team reported that during the month of August 215 citations were issued for hazardous violations, 142 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 110 citations were issued for parking citations. During the month there were twelve injury collisions (up 50 % from last month) and fifty-four non-injury collisions (up 60% from last month). Thirty-four drivers were arrested for DUI. This month also saw the beginning of the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. As a result of this program thirty-four citations were issued. During the month of August, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 104 calls for service (up 40 % from last month). The predominant number of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on twenty-six misdemeanors and three felony cases for various offenses. Nine citations were also issued. The Temecula Against Graffiti program (TAG) under the direction of Officer Anderson (POP team) conducted a program this month using six volunteers. As a direct result of this program, two citations were issued. No violators were observed spraying graffiti. The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. Two new school resource officers completed training and have started at their new schools. Officers Jeff Kubel and Dennis Shetier began this school year and bring the total of school resource officers to five. During the past month, the officers assisted with the final summer school sessions and they conducted counseling sessions with students. One arrest was made at Chaparral High School, and three arrests were made at the elementary schools. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. During this month the forty-ninth youth court sessions was held with eight cases being heard. The JOLT officer assisted at the summer school sessions and during absences fortraining. This month was also the two-yearanniversary ofthis program. Presentations were made at the August 8th City Council meeting to the youth court judge (a Deputy District Attorney) and four of the youth court attorneys (students) who have been with this program for the entire time period. During the month of August, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and Mark Krikava handled a total of thirty-four cases. These cases resulted in seventeen misdemeanor and nineteen felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. Sixteen citations for various violations were also issued. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. During this month the team apprehended a suspect wanted for a bank robbery in Murrieta. The team also served two search warrants for narcotic sales. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Undertheguidance~fv~lunteerc~~rdinat~rGayleGerrish~theP~liceDepartment~sv~lunteer staff contributed 606 hours of service in August. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, Iogistics support, crime observation (TAG program surveillance), special event assistance and telephone answering duties. Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, cdme prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 196 hours during the month. The posse contributed 131 hours during the month. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mike Brown, City Fire Chief September 26, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~('// RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of August, 2000, Temecula Fire Services Monthly Activity Statistics Month AUGUST Year 2000 Structure Fires 7 lb" 6 3 34 Vehicle Fires 3 0 ~ I 0 4 Vegetation Fires 16 6 3 2 27 Other Fires 3 12 2 0 17 Medical Aids 90 82 45 19 296 Traffic Collisions 22 0 5 6 33 False Alarms 41 33 9 t4 91 Fire Menace Standbys I 6 3 5 t5 Public Service Assists 5 0 1 10 16 Assists and Covers t6 21 3 17 57 Totals: 204 178 78 136 596 Community Activities 2 0 0 0 2 School Programs I 0 0 0 1 Fairs and Displays 0 0 0 0 0 Company Inspections 35 75 0 8 118 LE-38 Dooryard Inspectio0 0 0 0 0 Fire Investigations 4 0 0 3 7 Burning Permits Issued 1 0 0 2 3 Preplans I 0 0 0 1 Totals: 44 75 _ 0 1_3 . 132 Form B15-1 (4~99) By: Carl Calderon Date: 9~8~00 Medic Squad 84 Monthly Response Summary August 2000 Total Runs for the Month:266 Medical Aids 177 Traffic Collisions 37 Public S~tvice Assists 16 Fire Menace Standby' s 2 Strumre Fire 4 Ringing Alarms 28 Vegetation Fires 0 Vehicle Fires 2 Hazardous Materials 0 Average Response Time 4.89 Minutes Longest Responses Time R~ A~ Minutes I 73 17 [ 73 I 73 10 10 On Scene Mter AMR: I 23 On Scene Same Time as AMR: 64 Medical Aid Responses with Medic Squad On Scene Prior to AMR: On Scene Prior to AMR: 96 ~ 1 2 4 6 7 8 9 l0 11 Medic Squad Cancelled Enroute Prior to Patient Contact: [ 31 Medical Aids Tmfl~ Colli~m~ Medic Squad Cancelled On Scene Prior to Patient Contact: I 51 M~c~l Aids Tntffi~ Colli~i~ Medie Squad Performed Advance Life Support: [ 41 s, I ~ 10 10 J 96 Number of Time~ Prior 5 15 19 14 11 6 6 11 4 2 Number 17 14 Nmnber ' 45 6 Comments:. Medic Squad 84 responded to a total of 266 calls in the Month of August 214 of those calls were for Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions of which the Squad was cancelled 82 times or 38.3% of the lime. The Iviedic Squad arrived on scene prior to AMR 96 times or 44.8% of, the time, initiating ALS care on 41 calls. AMR's average response time to these calls was 4.76 minutes after the arrival of the Medic Squad. On five occasions, the Medic Squad was on scene greater then 10 minutes before the arrival. of AMR. The longest wait for an AMP, unit was 11 minutes. Medic Squad 84 had five response times of over 10 minutes for the month; of which three where in Station 73's response area, one was in Station 8Y s response area, and one was in Station 84' s response area. CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY f//~f' DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER fi'fl.J TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recant highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of August 2000. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries Staff supplied relocation information packets to Scotts Manufacturing to use in their recruitment efforts. The business is looking to open a new 400,000 square foot facility in Temecula that would employ approximately 400 people. Staff has supplied information and is in contact with a company in Arizona regarding a potential Lifelong Learning Center in Temecula. The emphasis of the canter will be on medical, technological, cultural, and environmental aspects. The facility will contain a K-12 school, adult classrooms for daily and weekly national/international seminars/conferences, a multimedia area, a wellness canter, and a demonstration area. Staff met with representatives of pending projects throughout the month, including Scotts Manufacturing, Promenade Mall, and Auto Mall projects. Staff will report next month on the number leads and inquiries that the City responded to in the month of August, A staff member was on vacation and we were not able to retdeve the information. Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building can be found in the Community Development Department report. Film Leads & Hinhli~hts In the month of August, the Film Council responded to 128 phone calls regarding the Film Festival, 17 calls regarding locations information requests. Major Studio Contacts Universal/3~" Line Productions was cantacted by the Film Council during their shoot of the film "Redline" on country reads near Hemet and the new reservoir, They were given information about businesses, hotels, and restaurants in Temecula. Due to the filming location, Hemet was chosen for their production headquarters. The Inland Empire Film Commission supervised this filming. The production company will be returnin9 in late September or October. The Temecula Valley Film Council has offered its services and will keep in contact. Please refer to the attached Film Council report for additional activities. MedialOutreach Materials Staff prepared the Temecula text for the IEEP 2001 Fact Book. The Fact Book provides data on IEEP member cities in the Inland Empire/San Bemardino areas. The publication is sent to businesses looking to relocate or expand in the ragion. Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce Monthly Newsletter announcing the two new business resource publications that are now available to our community. The City of Temecula Community Development Department recently published its new Pre- Application Handbook. This manual will help applicants navigate the initial stages of the development process for residential, commercial, manufacturing and industdal projects. Also, the "Southwest Riverside County Business Resource Guide" will assist new, expanding or relocating firms find key resources they need to succeed in the Southwest Riverside County market. On August 14th, staff met with Rhodes Design on the design and layout of the updated Temecula marketing brochure, community profile and testimonial insert. Staff prepared the text for the brochure and is currently completing the data for the profile. Staff is working with two local professional photographers on photo shoots. Views will include scenic shots, the Duck Pond, local businesses, wine country and the Balloon & Wine Festival. The photos will be utilized in the new marketing materials. On August 22"d, staff met with Penny Raszl, with the Inland Empire Magazine, and updated her on new developments, businesses, events and activities in the area. She introduced their new business section called "Metro Business". Feature articles in this section include business issues, profiles on local businesses and business leaders. Staff will send them updates on new business relocations, expansions, and developments for consideration in their publication. Ribbon Cuttin,q/Grand Openin~/Recel~tion Staff attended the Cost Plus World Market Ribbon Cutting on August 17~h. They are very excited to join the Temecula area and announced that this was their 113t" store nationwide. The retailer offers home d~cor, decorative gifts, gourmet foods and beverages (including Temecula wines), imported from 50 countries around the world. City Council and staff attended the Costco Grand Opening on August 31". The new 153,000 sq. ff. Costco is 35,000 sq. ft. larger than the former Temecula warehouse. Costco will employ approximately 340 people. Staff artended the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Reception on August 3~d at the Embassy Suites. The purpose of the reception was to thank the event sponsors for their participation and continued support. The organization presented the City of Temecula with a beautifully framed Festival poster. Former Chairman Bob Brown will officially present the poster to the City Council at the September 12b Council meeting. Meetin.qs Staff artended the EDC's Business Relations Committee Meeting held on August Company contact reports, follow*up action reports and the goal progress report were given. For fiscal year 1999-2000, there were 130 companies that were contacted which averaged over 10 company contacts per month. Staff attended the Muraleta Temecula Group meeting on August 4th at Callaway Winery. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council meeting on August 9th. Larry Markham of Larry Markham & Associates spoke about the lack of affordable housing in Temecula and Kelly Kostiuk of Riverside County EDA presented the new kiosk services. On August 10th staff met with Councilmember Mike Naggar and Alice Sullivan regarding surveying our business community to determine the economic benefits they receive from City-sponsored events. The Chamber and staff will work together to draft a business survey and present it to the Chambers Toudsm Committee for review and comment. In addition to the business survey, there will also be a visitors survey developed by the Chamber and City. The visitors survey will be given out to individuals to respond to at the Farmers' Market and the Chambers Visitor Center in Old Town during the Temecula Revisited Rod Run in September. The surveys will be used to track every major City sponsored event. Staff met with Display Tech Exhibits on August 16~ to develop Temecula's trade show display for the Septembers League of Califomia Cities Conference in Anaheim. The City received the Helen Putnam Award for the Ovedand Bddge overcrossing. On August 10~, Staff met with sponsors of the Susan G. Komen Race For The Cure to discuss potential sponsorship and event organization. TOURISM Media/Outreach Materials Staff provided Ruth Planey, a freelance wdter, with information and slides of Temecula for an article she is writing for the Inland Empire Family Magazine. The article's focus is family entertainment. In August, the Weekend Getaway segment on Temecula aired for the second time on Channel 7's Eye on LA show. The Chamber and City received cells and requests after the show aired. Staff worked with Latonya Davis Warren of The Press-Enterprise and provided her with toudsm information for a special toudsm section in their paper. It was published on August 26th. On August 15a', staff met with representatives with Sign On San Diego to layout the Temecula website pages and links for their website. This is the San Diego Union-Tribune official website and it receives over 10 million page impressions per month (that is over 100 million hits). Even though the focus is on toudsm, there will be a page on our community, lifestyle and businesses. Temecula's Sign On San Diego site will also be linked with the Chamber, Winegrowers, Arts Council, EDC, etc. Our contract will cover one year of advertising. FAM Tour Staff continues to work witl~ the Inland Empire Toudsm Council on the upcoming "Weekend in the Country" FAM Tour scheduled for October 6 - 8, 2000. The tour will include Idyllwild, the histodc site of the Ramona Pageant in Hemet, and Temecula. Three representatives from the California State Division of Toudsm publications, travel wdters from Westways magazine, RV Journal, Califonia Seniors, Malibu Times, West News Service, and Clay Francisco Films will be some of the attendees. Media Event Staff attended the Temecula Valley Film Festival Media Event on August 24t~ at Tower Plaza. The event was well attended by event sponsors, local media and a few of the filmmakers. Meetin~s On August 29b, Phil Baily met with Councilmember Ron Roberrs and staff to discuss ways in which the Winegrowers Association could work more closely with the City on marketing the wineries and tourism in general. Mr. Baily gave an update on the winedes and shared some of the new developments and activities that are taking place. As Chairman of the Advertising Committee for the Winegrowers Association, Mr. Baily will be invited to attend future City marketing committee meetings. On August 25th, staff met with Betty Goode of the San Diego Union Tribune regarding possible editorial and advertising opportunities for toudsm. On August 17~, staff met with Mada D' Avanzo and Madlyn Evans of The Press-Enterprise regarding a potential advertising co-op venture for Temecula toudsm related businesses and destinations in their Sunday Arts & Entertainment Section. Staff held a pre-planning meeting with the Temecula Revisited Rod Run event organizers and the Theater Foundation on August 30t~. Event organizers provide an update to the City departments on what progress is being made on the event. These meetings help insure that the event runs smoothly. On August 24~, staff met with Ann Howell Designs to update the City's tourism ad. The ad will reflect the new attractions in our area including the museum, shopping opportunities, cultural & recreational activities. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 September 13, 2000 Shawn Nelson, City Mm~ager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn: Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of August at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights 7 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet which includes information on demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizatiox~.s, etc. Committee Highlights Tourism & Visitors Council: The committee continues to work on the October 20 & 21 Fam Tour. The Chamber has received a huge response from the Tour Operators that have been invited. The areas of confirmed invitees include, San Diego, North Hollywood, Victorville, Pasadena and Los Angeles. Several confirmed tour operators were from contacts made by Chamber Staff at Febmary's California Travel Market and Los Angeles Times Travel Show. Education Committee: The committee has added new projects to the goals for the year 2000. Sub-committees have been formed to assist students in preparing for the job world. From creating a resume, filling in job applications, interviewing skills, to learning how to dress for work. The other project will work with elementary school children in taking a look at before- and-after school programs and perhaps involving other volunteer organizations. The videos of four local businesses filmed by the students of Chaparral High School have been completed. These videos will be used m the career libraries at the middle schools and high schools. The Chamber is supporting the TxFUSD's program to request funding in assisting students with disabilities in job training and job placement. Ways & Means Committee: Plans for the Autumn Fest Business Showcase are in place. The Showcase will be held on October 18, 2000 at Temeku Hills. Approximately 90 exhibitors will participate and over 800 guests are expected to attend. The B2B Technology Expo has been rescheduled for Friday, January 26, 2001. Press releases have been sent to media contacts in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bemardino, Riverside and San Diego counties. Preliminary plans for Installation 2001 have begun. The event will be held on February 17, 2001 at Pechanga Entertainment Center. Local Business Promotions Committee: The committee is preparing for the November Shop Temecula First Campaign. They are also geRing ready for the Success Seminar Series in November. It will take place at Embassy Suites on November 14th. Jack O'Donnell, Attorney at Law, will be speaking on labor and employer rights. The Mystery Shopper winner for October is Ernie B 's. The Businesses of the Month for October are The Press Enterprise and E & R Imprinting Government Action Committee: The Chamber is supporting the City Council 's resolution in supporting the integrity of the French Valley Airport. A letter has been addressed to Supervisor Venable stating the Chamber's position. A guest speaker from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers attended the last government action meeting and presented the different plan options for the Mumeta Creek project. The committee and the Board supports the Mumeta Creek project. Membership Committee: Chamber staff and Ambassadors attended 11 Ribbon Cuttings month of August. The committee is gearing up for the Membership Drive set for Sept. i 1- 1 5th. The anticipated goal is 100 new members during this week. The committee is currently working on the Special Topic Breakfast set for Oct. 25th at Embassy Suites Hotel @ 7:30am. A panel of speakers will answer a variety of questions regarding Business Expansion, which is the topic for the Special Topic Breakfast. · Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) * 300 Winery Brochures and 100 Temecula Brochures to Desert hills Premium Outlets for distribution to visitors at the outlet. · 200 Temecula Brochures to Temecula Creek Inn for distribution to guests. · 150 Visitor Guides to Lawrence Welk Resort for distribution to guests. · 150 Visitor Guides and 80 Winery Brochures to TVCC's Weekend Vjsitur Center. . ~ 50 Visitor Guides to Silver Spoon Caf~ for distribution to guests. · ~. 10 Temecula Brochures for distribution to TVCC's Fam Tour invitees. · 100 Temecula Brochures and 100 Winery Brochures to Paseo Del Sol for distribution to prospective homeowners. · 100 Temecula Brochures and I00 Winery Brochures to Warnet Spring Ranch for distribution to guests. · 100 Winery Brochures to Temecula Valley Balloons for distribution to clients. · 100 Winery Brochures to Outdoor Resorts for distribution to guests. · 60 Visitor Guides to Temecula Valley International Film Festival for distribution to festival attendees. · 60 Temecula Brochures to Papa Johns Pizza for distribution to guests. · 50 Winery Brochures to Pechanga RV Resort for distribution to guests. · 50 Temecula Brochures, 50 Visitor Guides, 50 Winery Brochures and 10 Relocation Packets to Paseo Del Sol for distribution to clients. · 50 Temecula Brochures and 50 Visitor Guides to [met for distribution to guests coming to Temecula. · 50 Temecula Brochures and 50 Visitor Guides to Temecula Valley Unified School District for distribution for a school recruitment. · 50 City Maps to Redhawk Realty for distribution to clients. · 10 City Maps to Rancon for distribution to prospective buyers. 2 Marketing Highlights · Chamber staff has responded to several requests regarding the rebroadcast of the Eye On L.A. Temecula segment. Activity Report · Total Tourism calls were 1,867 in August. · Total Phone calls were 3,518 in August. · Total Walk-ins were 2,327 in August. · Total Mailings were 289 in August. · E-Mail requests were up 98.84 percent in August. · Web page user sessions: N/A Also attached are the Meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Local Business Promotions, Membership Committee, and a August issue of Temecula Today! If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Thank you. Sincerely, van CC: Mayor Jeffery E. Stone Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Comerchero Councilman Ronald H. Robells Councilman Sam Pratt Councilman Mike Naggar Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolniek, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS "CHAMBER REFERRALS TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR AUGUST, 2000 Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month 337 154 65 1311 1,867 132 27 1,314 178 3,518 N/A Total Year-To-Date 2,885 1,284 2,985 9,643 16,797 1256 483 13,730 1,760 34,036 N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 242 72 2,761 CALENDAR OF EVEN TS 142 6 1234 SPECIAL EVENTS 25 1 593 GENERAL INFORMATION 562 57 6,555 RELOCATION 202 9 1,391 DEMOGRAPHICS 53 0 792 CHAMBER 818 4 6,980 MISCELLANEOUS 114 20 1,428 TOTAL WALK-INS 2, 158 169 21,734 98 100 91 289 20 42 109 171 N/A THIS MONTH 3,518 2,327 289 171 N/A N/A MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS CHAMBER REFERRALS 986 829 757 2,572 274 304 680 1,258 N/A YEAR-TO-DATE 34,036 21,734 2,572 1,258 2,342 8,614 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber August, 1999 August, 2000 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 459 337 -26.58 Calendar of Events 100 154 54.00 Special Events 327 65 -80.12 General Information 1,524 1,311 -13.98 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,410 1,867 -22.53 RELOCATION 169 132 -21.89 DEMOGRAPHICS 76 27 -64.47 CHAMBER 2,431 1,314 -45.95 MISCELLANEOUS 129 178 37.98 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 5,215 3,518 -32.54 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A WALK-INS TOU RISM 153 242 58.17 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 102 ! 42 39.22 SPECIAL EVENTS 223 25 -88.79 GENERAL INFORMATION 1030 562 -45.44 RELOCATION 164 202 23.17 DEMOGRAPHICS 80 53 -33.75 CHAMBER 1033 818 -20.81 M ISC ELLAN EOUS 73 114 56.16 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 216 169 -21.76 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,074 2,327 -24.30 MAILINGS TOURISM 119 98 -17.65 RELOCATION 98 100 2.04 DEMOGRAPHICS 91 91 0.00 TOTAL MAILIN GS 308 289 -6.17 E-MAIL TOURISM 29 20 -31.03 RELOCATION 15 42 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 42 109 159.52 TOTAL E-MAIL 86 171 98.84 N/A **WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS N/A * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls **New category relects Web-page requests Southwest Rtve~de Count~_ September 15, 2000 Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: Activity Summary - August 2000 Business Develooment · Staff sent a letter of introduction to Robert Pecorella, president of Northern Building Products, Inc. in Ridgefield, New Jersey. The company manufacturers windows and is looking to relocate. EDC Member Kelth Johnson referred Mr. Peeorella. · August 2, 2000 - Ernst & Young, LLP - Staff met with Katie Townsend of Ernst & Young to share information and discuss business development in SW Riverside County. Marketinll Outreach Staff attended the following meetings/events: August 9, 2000 - Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council - Staff attended the monthly meeting at the Temecula Workforce Development Center. "Explosive Growth in the '80's and '90's Relative to Housing and Employment" was presented by Larry Markham of Markham and Associates, and Kelly Kostiuk of Riverside County EDA presented a shop- talk discussion of the county's kiosk project and how it can be used by manufacturers seeking employees. Business Relations · August 1, 2000 - Visit with Grizzle & Hunter Plastics - Staff attended a business visit with Jeny Stouffer, general manager of Grizzle & Hunter Plastics. · August 3, 2000 - Staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee Meeting. (See attached meeting minutes.) · August 7, 2000 - Visit with Stretch Forming Corp. - Staff attended a business visit with Steve Chevlin of Stretch Forming Corp. Administration/Orl!anization · August 1, 2000 - Workforce Development Disaster Committee Meeting was held at the Temeeula Center. Staff is a disaster committee member. Committee members are implementing a disaster plan for all partners of the Center. · August 8, 2000 - Lake Eisinore Council Meeting - Staff presented Lake Elsinore's winning foursome of the EDC golf tournament with the perpetual trophy. Jim O'Grady City of Temecula Activity Summary - August 2000 Page 2 of 2 Administration/On~anization (continued) · August 17, 2000 - EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in the Workforce Development Center in Temeeula. (See attached draft meeting minutes.) · August 23, 2000 - Nominating Committee Taleconference Meeting was held to determine the slate of nominees for the election of executive officers. · August 23, 2000 - Web Site Meeting with Debi Spitzfaden oflntaire - Staff met with Ms. Spitzladen to discuss format and content of the EDC's new web site enhancements. · August 24, 2000 - Workforce Development Center Partner Meeting was held at the Temecula Center. Partners discussed facility maintenance and security issues, project coordination of special events, and activities of common interest. · August 29, 2000 - Workforce Development Disaster Committee Meeting was held at the Temecula Center. Staff participated in roundtable discussion of elevator mallunction procedures. · August 29, 2000 - Workforce Development Center AH-Staff Meeting was held at the Temecula Center. Irene Corral, NAFTA regional coordinator for the Employment Development Department presented on overview of the benefits to employees who are displaced due to a company's relocation to Mexico or Canada. Fact sheets are available at the EDC office. · During the month of August, staff responded to 3 new membership inquiries, mailed a second series of membership renewal letters, mailed a series of 100 new membership letters, responded to 1 web site email inquiry relative to employment, mailed the official ballots for directors-at-large elections, coordinated catering/location details and mailed announcements for the September quarterly luncheon, and mailed general announcements to the membership base relative to the election results. This concludes the activity summary for August 2000. Year-end financial statements, balance sheet, and changes in financial position for fiscal year 1999-2000 were prepared by Wihifred Samstag, CPA, and are being forwarded immediately. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 600-6064. Sincerely, Diane Sessions EDC of Southwest Riverside County -ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSENESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, August 3, 2000 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA Committee Members Present: Lisa Garcia-Gleissner~ Riverside County EDA/ACCESS Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc. Michael Lewin, Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Harter & Lewin Pam Migiioz2i, Dawn Human Resources Kathleen Newton, Publishing Professionals Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Bonnie Renz-Hanna~ Diversified The Staffing Solution David Rosenthai, SWRC Manufacturers' Council David Walte, Mt. San Jacinto Community College Randy Willlares Also in Attendance: Diane Sessions, EDC Staff Call To Order Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m. Welcome · Michael Lewin thanked all for attending. Follow-ul~ Action Reports · Spectrum Technology - No report available. Bonnie Hanna to follow-up. · Rancho Metal Supply - No report available. Lori Moss to follow-up. · Safari Gard - No report available. Gary Youmans to complete follow-up action on SBA lender list. Lori Moss to complete follow-up actions on owner's requests. Company Contact Reports · Hunter & Grizzle Plastics / Bear Irrigation - David Walte reported he and Diane Sessions visited Operations Manager Jerry Stouffer of Grizzle & Hunter Plastics. Owners Glen and Junelle Crrizzle, and Mr. Hunter, who were former executives for Toro Irrigation, rounded Grizzle & Hunter in 1994. Bear Irrigation is an spin-off company that originated in 1998. Operations and products of both companies include custom plastic injection molding for manufacturing of golf sprinkler mechanisms. Both corporations are privately held with a total of 45 employees. Twenty employees are temporaries from a local employment agency. Primary customers are both national and international. Products are marketing through an worldwide network distribution center, with territories on the east and west coasts. Primary competitors are Toro and Rainbird, located globally. Business is self-ranked as small. Sales are up in the past year due to new marketing strategy and product exposure. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - August 3, 2000 Page 2 of 3 Suppliers are located in Chino and Anaheim. Approximately 50% of employees live in Murrieta/Temecula regions, with the remaining 50% in Nuevo, Moreno Valley, Perris, Hemet and Riverside. Plans to expand by an additional 10,000 square feet are in the foreseeable future. Owners are looking to lease a building adjacent to their current location. Owners are in negotiations to merge with a supplier in Orange County that manufacturers sprinkler control parts. Possible problem for future plan is not enough 20,000 - 50,000 square foot buildings in the area, which could effect the possible relocation of their supplier partner. · Stretch Forming Corporation - David Waite reported he had a scheduled visit on August 8m. David Rosenthai volunteered to participate during the visit. · Advaneed Composites Engineering - Lisa Garcia-Gleissner reported she had a scheduled visit next week. · Tension Envelopes - Diane Sessions reported that Tfish Nelson had a phone interview with Tension Envelopes and completed a survey. Tensions Envelopes manufactures envelopes for ADP and photo film processing envelopes for Walmart. The company has been in business for 40 years, with 33 years in Los Angeles and 7 years in Temecula. There are 129 employees at the Temecula plant, with 22 outlying offices in various locations. Eighty percent of employees live in Murrieta and Temecula, with 20% in Lake Elsinore, Sun City/Menifee. Primary customers are large mailing houses, Staples, Farmers Insurance, Trans America and Star Crest. Primary suppliers are Boise Cascade and International Paper. The company is self-ranked as large within their industry. Business has been down within the past eight weeks. Owners are very happy doing business in SW Riverside County. Heavy traffic at Winchester and Ynez due to the Mall causes problems for employees and supply deliveries. Action Item: Diane Sessions to contact owner to inquire what is causing decline in business within the past eight weeks. · The Committee discussed forming a subcommittee to review the survey form and make modifications to condense. · The Committee congratulated Kathieen Newton on her appointment to CEO/president of the Muftieta Valley Chamber of Commerce. Goal Proltress Renort · Fiscal Year-End Totals: The Committee reviewed the 1999-2000 Annual Report compiled by Randy Williams. Mr. Willjams highlighted the Committee's goals and performance achievements for FY 1999-2000. He announced year-to-date goal results as follows: YTD VISIT PHONE POINTS Goal 27 33 114 Actual 30 22 100 Variance +3 -11 -2 Mr. Willjams reported 130 companies were contacted which averaged over 10 company contacts per month. He further reported that 17 companies requested assistance from the EDC, which all received responses. The Committee reviewed the hit ratios of contacts made. Mr. Williams noted that although the annual goals were met, performance on completing the surveys was down and could be improved. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - August 3, 2000 Page 3 of 3 Annual Visit Awards: Randy Williams thanked all for their commitment to the Business Relations Program. He announced there were three categories in which members showed exemplary participation. Mr. Williams awarded certificates of appreciation for "Best Attendance" to Jim O'Grady, "Point of the Year" to Bonnie Hanna for the most visits, and '"Point Point of the Year" to Lori Moss for the most points scored relative to visits. Kathleen Newton advised there were two meetings that did not reflect her attendance. Mr. Williams noted the discrepancy which did not alter the award results. He thanked and acknowledged each veteran member and new member for their dedication to the program. Mr. Willjams read the Committee's mission statement and reported that it was being fulfilled. Lastly, he commended Michael Lewin for accepting the position as Committee Chair. · 2000-2001 Visitation Calendar: The Committee reviewed the 2000-2001 Visitation Calendar that listed member assignments for the next twelve months. Mark O'Connor and Diane Sessions volunteered to be included on the assignment calendar. Action Item: Ms. Sessions to modit~, the calendar to fill in unassigned months and fax to the Committee. · Business License List: Ms. Sessions handed out sections of the TemeculaJMur~eta business license list to committee members and requested they choose companies they believe would make good visits. Action Item: Committee members to choose businesses for future visits and return to Diane Sessions at the September meeting. New Committee Assignments · No assignments were made for August. EDC/Citv/Countv News and Information Temecula - Jim O'Grady reported the grand opening for the Pala bridge was scheduled for August 18; the new Chemicon building was in process; the new Costco would open on August 31; bids for parking lot improvements were being obtained; the Stampede would receive parking lot improvements; a Rod Run was scheduled for September 21 or October 1; the SDG&E Utility Project would be presented on August 21 at the Temecula Community Center. Lake Elsinore - No report available. Murrieta - Kathleen Newton reported construction for Walmart was in process and the grand opening was expected on November 1; flood control issues were in review. Riverside County EDA - No report available. Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthai reported the Council's meeting on August 9th would have two speakers: Larry Markham of Larry Markham & Associates who would speak about the lack of affordable housing in Temecula and Kelly Kostiuk of Riverside County EDA would present the new kiosk services; the Council was still planning their social event on the Princess pleasure boat in Lake Elsinore on September 28; EDC Update - Diane Sessions reported the next quarterly luncheon was scheduled for September 28 with Dr. John Husing as the keynote speaker; the Business Resource Guide was completed and available through the EDC, the Economic Alliance, and the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Munieta and Temecula; elections for 10 EDC directors would be determined on August 16. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:03 a.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING Thursday, August 17, 2000 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA BOARD MEMBERS Ron Bradley, Temecula CONNECT Lon Brusegard, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Mike Doblado, The Promenade Mall Ron Holliday, City of Murrieta Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank Kathleen Newton, Publishing Professionals Lori Moss, City of Murrieta Phil Oberhansley, Cannon Parks & Oberhansley Bonnie Renz-Hanna Diversified The Staffing Solution A1 Sabsevitz, Verizon Grant Yates, City of Temecula Gary Youmans, Fallbrook National Bank EDC STAFF MEMBERS AND GUESTS Rob Moran, Riverside County EDA Chuck Washington, Habitat Humanity fOl' CALL TO ORDER · President CraW Youmans called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m. MINUTES · Motion was made by A1 Sabsevitz, seconded by Phil Oberhansley and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the July 20, 2000 Board of Directors Meeting as presented. FINANCIAL REPORT · The Board reviewed the July 31, 2000 Financial Report that showed a total monthly income of $19,474.79, total expenses of $11,977.24, with total eash-in-baak of $75.774.97. Motion was made by Ron Bradley, seconded by AI Sabsevitz and carried unanimously to approve the July 31, 2000 Financial Report as presented. CONTINUING BUSINESS · Web Site Proposal Update: Gary Youmans presented the proposals for the web site enhancements and recommended that Debi Spitzfaden's proposal be accepted due to greater scope of work and cost effectiveness. The Board agreed the committee should move forward with the project. NEW BUSINESS · Ratify Official Director-At-Large Election Ballot: Motion was made by Lon Brusegard, seconded by Bonnie Hanna and carried unanimously to ratify the official Director-At-Large Election Ballot. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - August 17, 2000 Minutes - Page 2 of 3 Rafffy Appointment of Inspectors of Elections: Motion was made by Phil Oberhansley, seconded by Ron Bradley and carded unanimously to ratify the appointment of Linda Fietz, Diane Sessions and Lori moss as Inspectors of Elections. · Director-At-Large Election Results: Gary Youmans announced the names of the 10 newly-elected directors for FY 2000-2001 as follows: Name Lorie Schulenberg Ron Holliday David Phares Gary Youmans Michael Lewin Keith Johnson Kathleen Newton Ron Bradley Mike Doblado Dennis Frank ReOresentin~ California Bank & Trust City of Murdeta D.L Phares & Associates Fallbrook National Bank Law Offices ofMirau Edwards Cannon Harter & Lewin Mission Oaks National Bank Publishing Professionals Temecula CONNECT The Promenade Mall UC Riverside Extension · Mike Doblado and Ron Holliday introduced themselves to the Board of Directors. Election of Officers: The Board discussed how to proceed with the election of officers and agreed to use a nominating committee. Phil Oberhansley, Lori Moss, and Gary Youmans volunteered as committee members and suggested that Tammy Walsh be asked to also serve. Gary Youmans asked the Nominating Committee to make their nominations by the next board meeting and the votes could be tabulated at that time. · Approve Record Date to Close Officer Nominations: Motion was made by Phil Oberhansley, seconded by Gary Youmans and carded unanimously to approve September 14, 2000 as the final date to close officer nominations. · Approve Record Date to Close Officer Elections: Motion was made by Phil Oberhansley, seconded by Ron Bradley and carded unanimously to approve September 21, 2000 at the final date to close officer elections. OPEN DISCUSSION · EDC Administrative Updates - Gary Youmans reported the new membership and renewals to date were $35,000 below the projected budget amount. He further reported he had verbal commitments from Bank of America and Wells Fargo Bank to join the EDC. Ron Bradley stated he contacted Union Bank, but without a positive response. Mr. Youmans announced the completion of the Business Resource Guide and the City of Temecula's Demographic, Economic and Quality of Life Data Report by John Husing. Copies of the report were distributed to each board member. · City, County and Chamber Updates: City of Temecula -Grant Yates announced the very positive city sales tax being generated. City ofMurrieta - Lori Moss reported the Home Occupation Business Survey was completed. She suggested the consultant could present the results at an upcoming EDC board meeting. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors General Meeting - August 17, 2000 Minutes - Page 3 of 3 Ms. Moss further reported the Muraleta Brokers' Meeting held on August 3, 2000 was well attended; and the City was approached by the owner of the entertainment triangle with a new proposal that included a medium sized conference center. Ci02 of Lake Elsinore - No report available. Coun(y of Riverside EDA / SWRC Economic Alliance - No report available. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - Bonnie Hanna reported the B2BTechnology Expo was canceled because of the Pechanga Fire. Mamtfacturers' Council - Lon Brusegard discussed the need for affordable housing for employees of manufacturing companies in the area. He stated the Council was beginning to recruit new members. Business Relations Committee Update: Gary Youroans reported that Michael Lewin was doing a great job as chair of Committee, and the Committee's goals for the new fiscal year were on track.. ADJOURNMENT · At 10:20 a.m., motion was made by Gary Youmans, seconded by Keith Johnson and carried unanimously to adjourn the meet'rag. Respectively submitted by: Linda Fietz Phil Oberhansley Recording Secretary Board Secretary TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT August 2000 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Secretary/Treasurer; Sheri Davis, Stacy Sievek, Judy Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council · This month we received 186 ohone calls; 128 - Film Festival, 17- locations information requesls, 41 - council business. · The TVFC web site. www. temecula~lm.org was completed on August 31, 2000. Photo and link updates will be a continuous process. The Temecula Valley Film Council also has a new eMail address at TVFC@pe.net. · Information is being prepared for the new Production Guide. The new Guide is scheduled to be completed for a major mailing following the Film Festival with new contact information. · Work is progressing on the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. As the TVFC is no longer producing the festival, our only direct involvement is the use of our phone for incoming film company calls and messaging. The phone line was forwarded for live answering at the end of August. Interested Film Council members will be volunteering at the Festival and the Film Council is providing welcome packets for the film makers including local tourism and business information and information on our TVFC Production Guide. · Film Festival Kick-offevent was held on August 24. The feature film was "Shergar' winner of last year's festival's Best Feature Film in both People' s Choice and Juried categories. Blue Rider Productions, producers of the film, have indicated that they are interested in film production in Temecula and will be returning for the Festival with 2 new films. Filming in Temecula · Universal/3rd Line Productions was contacted by the Film Council during their shoot of the film "Redline" on county roads near Hemet and the new reservoir. They were given information about businesses, hotels, and restaurants in Temecula. Due to the filming location, Hemet was chosen for their production headquarters. This filming was supervised by the 1EFC. The production company will be returning in late September or October. We have offered otw services and will keep in contact. · Local filmmaker, Joe Azerelli, will be producing and directing a film in Temecula using a strip mall on Margarita Road. Production should begin in October. TVFC will be meeting with Mr. Azerelli in September. · Representatives of a Texas business finn have shown interest in production in Temecula. With the help of the EDC, we are providing their representative with current information they have requested. · Many contacts t~om ShowBiz Expo will be attending the Film Festival. To give filmmakers a better picture of Temecula, shuttle has been set to take filmmakers to the wineries and proceed through Temecula to the Pechanga Reservation and back to the theater on a regular schedule both Saturday and Sunday afternoons. We will continue to support the daily management of~lmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP REAL ESTATE SUCCESSES (The IEEP reports monthly on significant real estate transactions that occurred with or without the assistance of IEEP, in order to provide leads to our members.) As a result of eftotis by the IEEP, Southern California Edison (SCE), the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC) and the city of Corona, a large plastics manufacturer has decided to stay in the Inland Empire. It is anticipated that in the near future, their current 200-employee contingent may be significantly increased with the consolidation of an out of state facility and the transfer of those operations to the Inland Empire. B&D Litho, a lithographic printing company, is expanding and relocating from Arizona to Ontario, signing a three-year lease for 19,600 SqUare feet of ~ndustrial space at 451 S. Ponderosa Avenue. The company, which employs about 20 people, will occupy the site in August. Scott Ostlund, with Lee & Associates, represented the landlord, Harker Family Trust, in the $280,000 transaction. CB Commercial represented the tenant. ABP Custom Manufacturing, a manufacturer of health care related products, is moving this month from outside the state to Rancho Cucamonga. The company, which employs about 45 workers, signed a three-year lease for 33,000 square feet of industrial space at 9000 Ninth Street. Scott Ostlund, with Lee & Associates, represented the lessor, Franke Consumer Products. Mike Daley, also with Lee & Associates, represented the lessee in the $450,000 deal. John Yeh, the owner of two furniture manufacturing firms, IEM Furniture and American Lighting, has bought a 50-acre site in Riverside where he plans to move his headquarters into 300,000 square feet of an existing 400,000-square-foot building, reported The Business Press. About 200 people are expected to work at the site, and Yeh expects to build as much as 500,000 square feet more of industrial space at the same location, at 800 Iowa Avenue, within the next two years. Michael and Anthony Brent, brokers with Lee & Associates, represented the buyer in the deal for an undisclosed price. Gary Blum and John, PaUl and Doug Earqhart, all brokers with Lee & Associates, represented the seller, CS First Boston. West Coast Chain, a maker of retractable key chains, is expanding within the Inland Empire, signing a 5.5-year lease for a 30;800-square-foot building at 4245 Pacific Privado in Ontario to replace the 13,800 square feet it currently occupies. The company, which employs more than 50 people, expects to move in October. Don Kazanjian, with Lee & Associates, represented the tenant in the transaction valued at more than $1 million. Scott Ostlund, also with Lee & Associates, represented the landlord, CPH Jurupa/Milliken LLC. HCI Inc., a fiber-optic cable installer that helps phone companies improve Internet service, is expanding within the Inland Empire, doubling its size from 20,000 square feet to 40,000 square feet in' Norco, reported The Press-Enterprise. The company paid $2.2 million for 49 acres where it will build the new headquarters. The company employs 900 people, about 250 of whom work at its headquaders and remainder at field offices in Perris, Victorvilie, Thousand Palms, other cities in Southern California and Northern California. Plans are to add another 120 employees to headquarters staff by the end this year. JB Engineers, a warehouser and fabricator of office furniture systems, is relocating from the San Gabriel Valley to a 27,000-square-foot building at 651 Barrington St. in Ontario. The company signed a three-year lease for $500,000 and 'CALEI DAR ITEMS To register online for SBDC events: vvvvvv. iesbdc.org August 15: A workshop entitled "Show Me the Money!" will take place from 9:30 to 12 noon at the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC), 1157 Spruce Street, in Riverside. Learn the basics of accounting and finance principles for small business, and gain a general understanding of accounting and finance for your business. This free event is sponsored by Citizens Business Bank. For info ca~l (909) 781-2345. August 16: A seminar entitled "Be Legal With Your Labor," designed to expose participants to legal requirements of hiring, managing, disciplining and terminating employees, will take place from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. at Cra~on Hills College (Rm. OE- 219) 11711 Sand Canyon Road, Yucaipa. Presented by a local attorney specializing in labor & employment matters, the cost to attend is $20 per person. For info call (909) 781-2345. Aug. 29: A seminar on "Entrepreneurial Finance and Accounting" will be held from 9:30 a.m. to noon at the Upland Chamber of Commerce, 433 N. 2nd Street, in Upland. It will cover the basics of accounting and finance principals for small businesses. Cost is $20. For more info, call (909) 781-2345. August 30: A seminar entitled "Home Based Business," for current and future home-based business owners will be presented from 6 to 9 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Moreno Valley City Hall, 14177 Frederick St., in Moreno Valley. Topics will include business plans and financing, legal structure, insurance needs and the basics of starting a business. Cost is $20 per person. For info call (909) 781-2345. Sept. 7: A free workshop on "Get the Tax Facts" will be held from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. This one-day overview of federal and state tax issues for small businesses will include information on how to set up a new business, earned income credit and electronic federal tax payment systems. For more information, call (909) 781-2345. Sept. 20: The September Membership Luncheon will be held in the San Juan Capistrano Room of the Mission Inn in Riverside. Guest speaker will be Peter Carpenter of the MWD, who will discuss the progress of the new Diamond Valley Lake near Hemet. The cost to attend is $25 per person, with registration beginning at 11:30 a.m. Reservations should be made by Sept. 14 by calling Margie Oswald, IEEP event coordinator, at (909) 890-1090, ext.236. II DUSTRY BREAKFASTS The Inland Empire Economic Partnership has begun a series of Industry Breakfasts to encourage an exchange of information identifying both the advantages and challenges of conducting business in the region. Five to ten IEEP members from designated industry groupings join I EEP officers and staff for roundtable discussions in the IEEP conference room. Several successful discussions have taken place, identifying issues and perceptions that IEEP will use to enhance strategic efforts for business attraction and retention. Members have expressed appreciation for a forum allowing them to exchange ideas and information specific to their industry. Watch for your invitation to meet with other members in your industry. For more information, contact Dianna Skeens, VP of Membership Development, at (909) 890-1090, ext. 233. TOURISM UPDATE The Inland Empire will be represented at the California State Fair August 17-20 in Sacramento with a joint-exhibit promoting both Riverside and San Bernardtrio counties. Inland Empire Tourism Director Jennifer Nutter will be in attendance to staff the booth, which depicts activities offered in the high desert. low desert, mountain resort and valley sub- regions of the Inland Empire. The theme of this year's Fair is California's Sesquicentennial, or 150th birthday. Happy Birthday to the Golden State! "A Weekend in the Country." a press trip featuring the artistic mountain community of Idyllwild, the site of the Ramona Pageant in Hemet, and Southern California's Wine Country in Temecula is set for October 6, 7 and 8. The complimentary tour is being offered to a select group of travel writers and is sponsored by the Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) and the Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC). ACTIVITY REPORT Notable activity in July included one lead and 18 inquiries, now being pursued by Business Development... The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) registered 91 total days of film activity and 139 requests for locations, with 7 permits issued in San Bernardino County, 3 in Riverside County, and 13 for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), for an economic impact of $3,072,000... The Small Business Development Center (SBDC) reported the creation of 25 jobs and the retention of 17, for an economic impact of $318,632... The SBDC counseled 164 clients for 921 client hours, and conducted 15 training events for attendees: .. and International Trade recorded 2 export actions for $75,000. SEPTEMBER MEMBERSHIP LUNCHEON The September Membership Luncheon will take place on Wednesday, Sept. 20, from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Mission Inn, San Juan Capistrano Room, in downtown Riverside. The guest speaker will be Peter Carpenter, Manager of Asset Management in the Corporate Resources Group for the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). He will discuss MWD's plans for recreation development at Diamond Valley Lake, Southern California's new drinking water reservoir located near Hemet. The MWD has selected a private development consortium to begin work on the grounds, marinas, picnic areas, golf courses, resorts and other recreational features. See 'Calendar' section for more details. SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE Eight of the IEEP Community Partners participated in a July 27 discussion on "Sustainable Communities." Katherine Melcher, a grad student attending Louisiana State University who is serving at IEEP this summer as a Sustainable Community Leadership Proaram Fellow, presented the results of a survey of Community Partners on quality of life issues. The survey covered ratings of current conditions in Inland Empire communities, the potential effects of population growth, and priorities for future development. The emerging concerns found in the survey included transportation, education, and economic development, while the greatest assets of the region appeared to be safety, health, and higher education. These priorities fit into the generally accepted definition of "sustainability" -- an approach that balances the concerns for the economy, the environment, and social equity. The floor was then opened to the community partners to discuss how economic developers could play a role in these wider issues. From this discussion, some suggestions for action were given and some key topics emerged. The IEEP will use these comments, along with the insights gathered from the Civic Entrepreneur Workshop this past June, to develop a Sustainable Communities initiative. WELCOME I EW PARINERS IEEP would like to welcome the newest members to the Partnership: · PE.net, an Internet Provider, offering local dial-up accounts, customized web pages, domain name hosting, and other services for an effective internet presence, in Riverside. Marian Dudley, the customer service manager, can be reached at (909) 782-7632. · CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. of Fontana, is the only West Coast steel supplier of hot rolled, pickled and oiled, galvanized. cold rolled sheet, and electric resistance welded pipe. Vice President of Administration Brett Guge can be reached at (909) 350-6208. · CALIFORNIA PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION CO. of A~aheim, is committed to improving the quality of life for over a 100,000 commuters each day on the 91 Express Lanes, by offering them a fast, safe, and reliable commute. General Manager Greg Hulsizer can be reached at (714) 637-9191. CIVIC EI TREPREI EUR WORKSHOP At the Civic Entrepreneur Workshop in June, IEEP members gathered to discuss how they would like to see the Inland Empire develop in the next twenty years. As a follow up to the workshop, participants were asked to complete a Community Checklist, which rated how our region is performing on four cornerstones important to developing a strong and new economy. The respondents placed high emphasis on community leadership in the new economy, quality of life as a community asset, and communities as part of a larger economic region. The findings point to the fact that the Inland FILM UPDATE The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) has accepted the responsibility of responding to permit requests for the Mountaintop and Front County Ranger Districts in the San Bernardins National Forest for at least the next two months, The IEFC currently processes permits for San Bernardins and Riverside Counties, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and works with production companies to ensure compliance with federal, state and local laws. And,... the movie "Space Cowboys," which was shot in the Inland Empire and stars Glint Eastwood and James Garner, opened in theaters this week. BIG BEAR FILM FESTIVAL The first annual Big Bear Lake International Film Festival, a showcase for filmmakers and students alike, will be held Sept. 15-17 at Big Bear Lake. The inaugural "Bear Fest 2000" will begin with an opening night gala, a premier film screening and an awards presentation at the Performing Ads Center on Friday, Sept. 15. The Village Theaters will showcase the works of filmmakers and students during the weekend, and a 'Wrap Pady' at the Marina Rivera Tent on the evening of Saturday, Sept. 16 will feature food prepared by Hollywood Catering, dinner and dancing, and more awards! The festival's winning films will be screened at the performing Arts Center on Sunday from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Bear Fest 2000 is co sponsored by the Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) and the County of San Bernardinc. For ticket and sponsorship information, call the Festival office at (909) 866-3433. Please send materials for consideration to Paul J. Palsa, IEEP Marketing Directon Submissions can be sent by e-mail to ppalsa@ieep.com, or by fax to (909) 890-1088. All materials should be received by the last Friday of each month. INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP 301 East Vanderbilt Way, Suite 100 San Bernardins, CA 92408 (909) 890-1090 Fax (909) 890-1088 tooms@ieep.com - www.ieep.com Lake Elsi~e, CA 82530 F~(~ Ternecu~ CA 92590 ECONOMIC ALLIANCE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Madene Best Assistant City Manager City of Lake Elsinore Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula Lod Moss Assistant City Manager City of Murrieta Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator September 6, 2000 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement. Marketing Plan/Budqet: The 2000-2001 MOU is currently pending approval from each Partner. Web-site: Our web-site at www.swrco.com is complete and up. The site consists of five pages with pictures, music and a link to each partner~s web-site. We will receive a monthly access report that will provide information, such as who is hitting the site, what time, the pages most hit, etc. A copy of this report will be distributed monthly with this update, starting October 2000. We also have a web-site on Expansion Management "E-sites", located at www.expansionmana~ement.com. In the Califomia section, you will find the Alliance logo and information about Southwest Riverside County; also interested businesses are able to download our brochure and insert pages, link to our web-site, or e-mail me directly. Leads: As a result of our marketing efforts, we have had 362 leads to date. Of these leads, 284 were a result of trade shows, 65 were a result of our ad with Expansion Management Magazine, 11 were a result of advertising with KOGO radio in San Diego and two were leads from other SOUrces. Please note that the above lead totals do not reflect all responses; rather they reflect qualified leads only. Radio: We have decided to pursue radio advertising in the San Diego region. These :30-second spots will air on KOGO 600 AM, KSDO and XTRA AM. These commercials will run for four to six weeks along with the television commercial. As explained in the last Partners meeting, the radio spots will be paid on a weekly basis with the opportunity to cancel if we are not satisfied with the lead results. Television: The approved commercials will start aidng in the San Diego region on Channel 7 dudng "Good Morning Amedca" and dudng the local news on Channel 15 beginning on September 18, 2000. We will have a total of 192 spots dudng the hours of 5:30 AM - 8:00 AM, Monday through Fdday for six weeks. Advertising The Alliance has placed a ~ page ad in the September issues of Expansion Management and Medical Devise & Diagnostic Imaging. These magazines will be distdbuted at three trade shows during the next month. Expansion Management has a special "location rating" feature story in September and Medical Device & Diagnostic Imaging is doing a feature on Medical Extrusion technology. We have also placed a ~ page ad in Octobers issue of Business Xpansion magazine. This particular issue features articles on the "high tech industries". Along with this ad, I have negotiated two banners on theirweb-site, Riverside County has been highlighted with a red- star on the California map (there is only one red star in the state of California), and a link to our web-site has been provided. This can be viewed at www.acn.net. CD-ROM I will present the quotes received for the CD-ROM at the next Alliance meeting. In doing this, I can better demonstrate the proposals and answer any questions the partners may have. Trade Shows The Alliance has committed to the following trade shows: Wescon - Sept. 19-21 NACORE - Sept. 24-27 BioCom - Oct. 30-31 Comdex - Nov. 13-17 Golf Balls The golf balls are in and have been provided to each partner. These balls will be provided to interested businesses that tour Southwest Riverside County and at trade shows. Direct Mail At the last Alliance meeting, it was determined that we will pursue a direct mail campaign. The first part of this campaign will focus on the Southern Califomia region, with the second to focus on Northern California. I have started work on the design of the postcard and obtaining the mailing lists. Our target industries will include biomedical and high-tech companies. More specifically, the presidents, owners and CEO's of these companies. The mailer will be released during the commercials and radio campaign. On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings: Manufacturer's Council Business Relations Committee EDC Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (909) 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robert Moran Teresa Gallavan APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager September 26, 2000 Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department in the month of August 2000. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 40 new applications for administrative, other minor cases and home occupations and 4 new applications for public hearings during the month of August. The new public hearing cases are as follows: Development Plan Specific Plan Amendment Tentative Parcel Map Conditional Use Permit Status of Major Projects Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and prepare the following cases for public hearing before the Community Development Director or Planning Commission: The Village of Temecula Apartments - The design and construction of 160-unit, 2-story apartment complex w/clubhouse and pool, on the south side of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic Drive and south extension of Moraga, east of the proposed Temecula Ridge Apartments. DRC meeting held on May 25, 2000. A second DRC meeting is scheduled for August 21, 2000. · A Planned Development Overlay proposal encompasses the Village of Temecula Apartments and office/retail component along Rancho California Road. Harveston (Formally known as Sweetwater - Lennar Communities) Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Development Agreement- located northerly of Santa Gertrudis Creek and west of Chapparal High School. Project is currently under review. R:\MONTHLY.RP3~2000~AUGUST 2000.doc 1 Rancho Community Church expansion on Vallejo Avenue. The project is on hold, as the applicant is still looking at other alternatives for their development. The applicant met with staff in January to discuss potential options. Wolf Valley Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Repod, General Plan Amendment, and Tentative Tract Map - Heard by the Planning Commission on September 6, -2000 and was continued to September 9, 2000 in order to receive additional information on the sports park proposal as an alternative for the former high school site. Commissioners also had areas of concern to be addressed by staff, applicant and consultants. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: The results of an independent feasibility study analyzing the viability of the formation of an assessment district for the construction of off-site infrastructure was evaluated by the City Council Ad Hoc Committee. The Committee will recommend that the City resume processing the project at the September 12, 2000 City Council meeting. Meadowview Golf Course -On June 7, 2000, the Planning Commission continued the case off calendar at the request of the applicant. A biological "summit" was held on August 30, 2000 and project biologist is working with the biologist who had concerns to submit a revised bio report to the City. Temecula Ridge Apartments - The design and construction of 246 apartment units on 22.21 acres on the south side of Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. Planning Commission approved the project on August 16, 20000 following the joint PC-CC meeting held August 1, 2000. The project has been appealed by Councilman Naggar and the appeal shall be heard by the council on October 10, 2000. Quaid Harley Davidson - The design, construction and operation of a 17,371 square foot Harley Davidson motorcycle dealership with sales and repairs located on the north side of Front Street, approximately 1,800 feet west of the Interstate 15 Freeway on-ramp Approved at August 2, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting. Provident Savings Bank - To construct and operate a 3,000 square foot Provident Savings Bank with drive-thru services in the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road. DRC meeting was held on October 21, 1999. Re-submittal received on March 24, 2000. Approved at August 3, 2000 Director's Hearing. Hilton Garden Hotel - To construct a 100-room hotel on 1.38 acres located on the westerly side of Rancho Highland Drive, westerly of Ynez Road. The accompanying General Plan Amendment is on hold with the Planning Commission. Resubmitted on May 11, 2000. Third DRC meeting held with the applicant August 29, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. Overland Self Storage - Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the design, construction and operation of a 43, 174 square foot mini-self storage facility with office, resident manager's quarters and RV storage spaces located approximately 155 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is still awaiting re-submittal. Palomar Hotel - Remodel of the existing Palomar Hotel to the Palomar Inn (a bed and breakfast) located on the northeast corner of Front and Fifth Streets. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2.000%AUGUST 2000,doc 2 Road. Resubmitted plans for review on May 31. 2000. Meeting with the applicant was held on August 16, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Oveday- Proposal by the applicant to change 33 acres zoned for Professional Office use to a mixed used zone, which will allow for commercial and residential uses. The Planning Commission has reviewed this project and recommended approval to the City Council. Scheduled for September 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. · Keeton Trust office building design and construct two story 15,883 sq. ft. office building located on Enterprise Circle North. DRC was held August 10, 2000. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. · Johnny Cadno's: A 7,383 sq. ft., 228 seat Italian Restaurant on Pad H at the Promenade Mall. DRC was held August 31, 2000. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. Small Business Assistance Rhythm and Brews: Staff has continued to help the owner of this proposed brew pub in Old Town resolve several problems with his plan check. The plumbing, electrical and mechanical permits for this project have been issued. The structural permit should be approved during the week of September 12th · Israel Gonzalez (Mexican Artifacts): Staff is currently processing a development plan forthis new business in Old Town. · Health Insurance Agency: Assisted this small business owner with information and applications for obtaining new signs in Old Town. Provided her with specific design possibilities. · Cobblestone Cottage: Advised this Old Town business regarding new sign designs for this site. · Psychic Reader: Worked with this Old Town Merchant to resolve her problems with non- conforming signs. · Rooster Crossing: Assisted this business located in Old Town with approval for new signs. · Butterfield Inn: Worked with owner to obtain approval from the Old Town Local Review Board for a new sign and paint job for this building. Special Events Permits Temecula Revisited Rod Run: Processed an application forthis upcoming car shew to be held in Old Town Temecula on September 29t', 30th and October 1=. Staff has held organizational meetings with all involved departments and the applicant. · Inland Empire Race for the Cure: Staff had an organizational meeting with all City departments and applicants involved with this event, which is scheduled for October 22, 2000. · Tractor Race at Northwest Sports Park: Staff aided applicant in preparing a preliminary application and site plans for a temporary use permit. Massage Establishment Permits R:VvIONTHLY.RP'r~,000~AUGUST 2000.doe 3 Massage Establishment Permits · Staff has finished working with the Police Department and finalized the procedures for Massage Establishment Permits, Beauty Club Petite Spa at 40420 Winchester Road was granted a one-year Massage Establishment Permit upon receipt from the Temecula Police Department of criminal history clearances of all owners and operators. La Papillion Spa located at 28751 Rancho California Road is requesting approval of a new massage establishment permit. The Police Department has reported that the owner's fingerprints need to be reprocessed. A new set of prints is currently being evaluated. Golden Touch Massage located at 28274 Old Town Front Street has applied for a new Massage Establishment Permit. Due to a backlog of fingerprint clearance requests that need to be processed by the State of California Department of Justice, staff has not yet received a criminal history clearance from the Temecula Police Department. Special Projects & Long Range Plannincl Activities The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities are as follows: Housing Element Update: The City has received a draft of the City's Regional Housing Need Assessment obligations and staff has provided corrections to the text. A joint City Council/Planning Commission work session was held on August 1,2000. The draft element is currently being prepared. · Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: The consultant has gathered much of the information needed to begin preparation of the Draft EIR. Comprehensive General Plan Update: Only two proposals were received in response to the initial RFP. Staff has been contacted by several other firms who will be invited to submit a proposal. Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop in the fall of 2000. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Vail Ranch Annexation: The item was continued to September 28, 2000 at the August 24th LAFCO hearing. Since the August 24th meeting, staff met with County staff to discuss agreements for the long-term maintenance of the historic buildings within the annexation area. Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Application Fee Study: Staff has provided information to the consultant and Finance Department about which applications should not be charged the full-cost of processing, and several items still need to be corrected. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2000~AUGUST 2000.doc 4 · Hillside Development Policy: The policies are being examined for integration into the draft grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County: Councilman Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee meetings and monitoring the process of determining conservation reserve needs. Comments regarding these meetings are presented during Council Business on the last meeting of the month. Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance: The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 meeting. Based upon the Commission direction, staff will be making additional changes to the Ordinances in the next few months. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. · Citywide Sign Inventory: The process of inventorying signs is pending additional staff resources, County Project Reviews: Staff continues to allocate significant resources to review projects within the County and other local jurisdictions that could affect the City of Temecula. Information regarding these projects will be forwarded under separate cover labeled Projects of Concern. · Helium Balloon Ordinance Amendment: As directed by the City Council, this item will be scheduled for the Planning Commission later this year. General Plan Annual Report: Staff is reviewing the implementation measures from the General Plan and preparing to meet with the other departments and the City Council Subcommittee. A draft of the Report will go the Planing Commission in July and to the Council in August. · Southside Specific Plan: This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. · Other General Plan Amendments. One Circulation Element Amendments is pending. · A request to delete Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missiones from the Circulation Map. This item will be presented to the Council in September. Geographic Information System (GIS) Activities Recent mapping products include Pala Road dedication map and photo enlargement. Also, prepared street notification map and data for Public Works. Updated the General Plan and Zoning maps and prepared a map for the Rod Run event for the Planning Department. · Staff gave a GIS demonstration for the ESRI User Group meeting at Rancho Water District. · Staff is continuing in its efforts for the ultimate implementation of the Fire Department's MaxResponder routing and pre-plan system. · Staff is running final tests to finalize the MapObjects program. Due to timing issues with ESRI, we have been delayed and expect to go live in October. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~.000~AUGUST 2000.doc 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER :~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 26, 2000 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of August 2000. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report August / September 2000 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: September 26, 2000 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Street, Old Town Front Street and Santiago Road will be signalized. The Contractor has completed the construction of Abutment No. 1, Pier No. 2, and Abutment No. 3. The channel backfill is complete with the bridge falsework beginning the third week of September. The remaining storm drain work is underway with paving on the westside of Front Street scheduled for the end of this month. 2. Pala Road Bridge The new Pala Road Bridge is now open to through traffic. The soundwall at Rainbow Canyon/Pala Road is complete. Signal work is complete and functioning. Punchlist, as-builts and final survey remains. 3. Sports Park Tot Lot Equipment Replacement McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. was awarded the construction contract at the May 9, 2000, City Council Meeting. The Pre-Construction meeting was held on June 7, 2000. Construction began on September 13, 2000 and will end in early November. The installation of the play equipment started on September 20, 2000. 4. Caile Aragon Park Drainage Structures The project is complete. The City Council accepted this project at their September 12, 2000 meeting, and the Notice of Completion has been filed. 5. Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation The project is complete and the parking lot is now open to the public. 6. FY99-2000 Pavement Management System, Various Streets This is a new project to reconstruct roadway pavement on Ynez Road between Santiago Road and La Paz Street. Project is 60% complete. Additional funds approved by City Council on 9/12 will allow for an additional 1500 feerofpavement reconstruction on Ynez south ofLa Paz Street. Anticipated completion is mid October. R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2000\August 7. Old Town Parking Lot Trugreen Landscape was awarded the construction contract at the August 8, City Council Meeting. The notice to proceed was issued to the contractor on September 18, 2000. Construction is scheduled to begin on October 2, 2000. 8. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing 2 story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, two new second floor restrooms and a kitchenette. Construction will also include a single story masonry block office space addition. Project was awarded at the September 12, 2000 council meeting. Construction is to start in October, once all the contract documents are in order. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Pala Road Bridge Landscape This project will install landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane. It includes the installation of an irrigation system, planting and hydroseeding. Bids are scheduled to be opened on September 21, 2000. 2. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block Soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive averaging 14' in height. Bids are scheduled to be opened on October 5, 2000. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. MurrietaCreekCrossingBetweenWinchesterandRanchoCaliforniaRoad-Low-flowCrossing at Via Montezuma This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. Surveying of the project area has been completed and in-house design is 90% completed. The completed improvement plans were submitted to Riverside County Flood Control District on August 11, 2000 for 1 st plan review. Project specifications are being prepared and a hydrology study may be required. Tom Dodson & Associates, an environmental consultant, has begun the work necessary for the permitting process. 2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. Process for design has begun. Areas to be rehabilitated were identified and Plans and Specifications are being completed 2 R:\MonthlyAetivityReport\CIP~2000\August and reviewed. The Plans and Specifications should go out to bid in mid-October. 3. Diaz Road Realignment The designer is currently preparing the improvement plans for 90% submittal. Design is scheduled for completion by November 2000. 4. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road The City returned 90% plan check comments to the consultant for revision. Design plans will be completed during the month of September and the project will be advertised for bids in October. 5. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gemdis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Consultant returned the 2nd plan check to Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) and the have provided us with their comments. Consultant has submitted the 2nd plan check to Caltrans. 6. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and atPalaRoad and WolfValley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, at Loma Linda and at Wolff Valley. The plans and specifications are complete. This project will be advertised for bids in October. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development Corporation sewer project. 7. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) City staff has completed the review of the 70% improvement plans/specs and sent a plan check letter to DMJM the week of September 18. The project is funded for design only at this time. DMJM is proceeding with the work, which includes geotechnical, utility research, environmental, and final design. 8. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Bridge to Wolff Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Peehanga Indians). Encroachment permits were issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim sweet improvements. Traffic signal/stripping plans have been completed. Murricta Development Corporation will be constructing the new trunk sewer/pavement section from Clubhouse Drive to the main entrance of the Pechanga Casino. 9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center and Adding a Right Turn Lane on Westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas. A new project to add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez is being combined with this project due to its close proximity and for efficiency. The project is currently in design. Right of way acquisition at the noaheast comer of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. 3 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIPX2000~August 10. Sports Park Pond Desiltation This project will clean up the Desiltation Pond in the Sports Park by removing the silt to allow proper drainage downstream. The design plans are essentially complete. The biologist is preparing an Environmental Mitigation Plan. This project will be advertised for construction bids in late September. 11. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) The Contract with Project Design Consultants was approved by City Council at the July 11, 2000 Meeting. The design process has begun and the work will be coordinated with design of the library project. The 30% improvement plan submittal will be delivered to the City on October 18, 2000. 12. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. Project is presently in the design stage. First plan submittal for staff review is scheduled for September 2000. 13. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. Design is progressing on schedule. Architect started on the final drawings after the committee completed its design development meetings. Letters are being sent to all the utilities requesting services. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II Street Improvements. 14. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek In this project, Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek will be widened. The consultant will do an alignment study to determine the side(s) of the existing bridge where widening will be most appropriate. A kickoff meeting to begin design was held with TY Lin McDaniel on September 12, 2000. Design will take six months. 15. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool The design committee has determined the layout of the 25-Yard x 25-Meter pool at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. An alternative to add spray-type play equipment will be included in the construction bid. The design continues and is expected to be completed in November. 16. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install a sidewalk on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Staff is gathering the data, reviewing concepts, and establishing a layout. 17. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Redesign In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem. Staff is gathering the data, reviewing concepts with TCSD, and establishing design requirements. 4 R:\MonthlyActivityRepon\CIP\2000~August 18. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita In this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Margarita Road at Stonewood Drive. Design is underway. First submittal is expected by the end of September. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Information is being gathered. The preparation of Plans and Specifications will start shortly. 19. Pavement Management System- Citywide This project ~vill involve rehabilitating various streets in the City. Prior to determining the streets to be rehabilitated, the Pavement management System Program (PMS) for the City will be updated. Work on updating the PMS program has started. 20. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added to accommodate increasing traffic. Staff is reviewing this project to determine requirements. Coordination with Caltrans will be required since Winchester is a State route at this location. Caltrans will be re-striping the intersection as a 4-way school crossing. Re-striping is to be completed by 9-29-00. 21.1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road This project will re-stripe the northbound on-ramp from westbound Winchester to I-15 to allow for a better flow of traffic. A striping plan is in the process of being prepared. The City will be applying for an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans. 5 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2000~August 0 r~ 0 ,..~'r ~-. u~O u,l I-- LLI._ 0 I~, I-- Z U,I ul 0 I~, _,1 I'- 0 C9 0 a:: 0 Ill n z c_F, ~ - ~ b< ~ o o .-- , d 0 0 Iml III Iml n,' n --~- w(:) I--~ u_l-- n I-- Iml III n / ~.-- .= z z z ~ z z z ~ CD CD TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent September 4, 2000 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - August, 2000 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of August, 2000: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired 189 11 10 19 2~550 44 8 275 35 1 ~238 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A, Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned VI. VII. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 639 New and repainted legends B. 2t852 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 46 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 38 service order requests for the month of July, 2000. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 79 events and response to street emergencies. hours of overtime which includes standby time, special The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of Auclust. 2000 was $ 7~'165.00 compared to $ 6~790.00 for the month of July, 2000. Account No. 5402 $ 7,165.00 Account No. 5401 $ - 0 - Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works All Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) o~..~ oo ooo 8 oo 8 oo 8 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of August, 2000 DATE DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK TOTAL COST SIZE CONTRACTOR: Date: 08/10/00 # 5402 BECKER ENGINEERING MARGARITA NORTH OF LA SERENA EAST SIDE OF STREET REMOVE AND REPLACE 150' OF SIDEWALK AND UNDER-THE-SIDEWALK DRAIN CONTRACTOR: Date: 08/07/00 # 5402 RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT CITYWIDE TOTAL COST $ 4,165.00 R.O.W. TRASH AND DEBRIS PICK-UP CITYWIDE Date: TOTAL COST $ 3,000.00 Date: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 TOTAL COST -0- $ 7,165.00 -0- DATE 08/02/00 08/03/00 08/07/00 08/08/00 08/14/00 08/15/00 08/15/00 08/22/00 08/28/00 08/29/00 08/29/00 08/31/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK OVERLAND AT YNEZ RANCHO WAY ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH WALCOTT LANE OVERLAND 300' WEST OF JEFFERSON JEFFERSON 500' SOUTH OF CHERRY JEFFERSON 100' NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. 28822 FRONT STREET 28890 FRONT STREET ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH AT WINCHESTER RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT FRONT F/W/BFF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF MORAGA A.C. OVERLAY REMOVE 7 REPLACE A.C. A.C.. OVERLAY R&RA.C. FILL POTHOLE A.C. OVERLAY A.C. OVERLAY R&R A.C. R&R A.C. A.C. OVERLAY R&R A.C. R&R A.C. S.F. 375 164 360 200 2 450 20 156 124 520 84 95 TOTAL TONS 2.5 5 5.5 5 1 BAG 5.5 4, 6.5 4.5 3 3 3.5 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2,550 TOTAL TONS 44 DATE 08/01/00 08/03/00 08/21/00 o8/21/oo 08/25/00 CITY OF TEMECULA .DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 LOCATION VIA JUMILLA RANCHO VISTA WEST OF SOUTHERN CROSS CALLE NOVELDA AT CORTE BENAVENTE 31998 CORTE POSITA 30969 CALLE PIF, IA COLADA WORK COMPLETED CLEANED & CHECKED I CATCH BASIN CLEANED & CHECKED I CATCH BASIN CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED __8 DATE 08/01/00 08/07/00 08/07/00 08/07/00 08/08/00 08/08/00 08/09/00 08/09/00 08/09/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/21/00 08/22/00 08/22/00 08/23/00 08/28/00 08/29/00 08/29/00 08/29/00 08/30/00 08/31/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 LOCATION BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT JEREZ LANE WINCHESTER AT ~EFFERSON 45647 MASTERS DRIVE BRASSIE DRIVE AT HONORS DRIVE (8 LOCATIONS) WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON PUJOL STREET JEFFERSON AT EL POLLO LOCO EMPIRE CREEK BEHIND TARGET CNETER PASEO BRILLANTE FRONT STREET AT 79 SO. FRONT STREET AT 79 SO. WINCHESTER @ SANTA GERTRUDIS CRK. {8 LOCATIONS) WINCHESTER ~ SANTA GERTRUDIS CRK. (8 LOCATIONS) WINCHESTER AT DIAZ 26201 YNEZ CDRTE FLORENCITA VIA TORRES AT PAUBA UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA FOOD FOR LESS FOOD FOR LESS LA SERENA AT WALCOTT WORK COMPLETED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED REMOVED 48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 198 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 102 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 6 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 160 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 150 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 157 S.F. OF GRAFF1TI 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 72 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 123 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 1~238 TOTAL LOCATIONS 35 ~ ~oz CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 DATE RECEIVED 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/07/00 08/07/00 08/08/00 08/10/00 08/10/00 087/10/00 08/11/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/15/00 08/16/00 LOCATION 39576 DIEGO DRIVE 41810 RIO GRANDE 40473 CALLE MEDUSA 41693 AVENIDA DE LA REINA 31220 N1COLAS ROAD 31136 WELLINGTON CIRCLE 43028 CORTE FRESCA 41785 ENTERPRISE C1RCLE SOUTH 41284 BRAVOS 31412 PASEO GOLETA 29720 MIRA LOJA 98 FACULTY WAY 31470 PASEO GOLITA 41766 BARGIL COURT 31520 JEDEDIAH SMITH CAMINO DEL ESTA AT VIA PURETA 29935 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL 45928 CLUBHOUSE 44019 SHELDON COURT 45996 PARSIPPANY COURT 40377 CALLE MEDUSA 42288 AGENA 30958 GREENSBORO 42758 TWILIGHT COURT REQUEST POTHOLE CONCRETE REPAlR DOWN MAIL BOXES RAISED SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY WASHED OUT STREET SINKING STREET RESURFACING CONCRETE REPAIRS SWEEPER CONCERN TREE DOWN STREET REPAIRS POTHOLE TREE TRIMMING SLURRY CHANNEL CLEANING STREET NAME SIGN CONCRETE REPAIR TREE PAINT SPILL TREE TREE WATER LEAK TREE DEBRIS PICK-UP DATE WORK COMPLETED 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/07/00 08/07/00 08/08/00 08/10/00 08/11/00 08/10/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/15/00 08/15/00 08/15/00 08/16/00 08/15/00 08/16/00 DATE RECEIVED 08/16/00 08/17/00 08/21/00 08/22/00 08/23/00 08/23/00 08/24/00 08/24/00 08/25/00 08/25/00 08/25/00 08/25100 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/2900 08/29/00 08/29/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 LOCATION 41845 6TM STREET 32113 CALLE NOVELDA 31998 CORTE POSITAS 43384 VIA ANGELES 41057 VINTAGE CIRCLE CHEMIN CLINET 40371 CALLE MEDUSA 30969 CALLE Plea COLADA 41526 AVENIDA DE LA REINA SANTA CECILIA AT MIRA LOMA 45558 OLYMPIC WAY 40250 BENWOOD COURT 43470 CORTE ALMERIA 41440 WILLOW RUN ROAD 43652 BUCKEYE ROAD 30018 CORTE CANTERA 30798 CANTERFIELD DRIVE 40312 WINDSOR ROAD 29765 AVENIDA DE CALAZADA 39300 OAK CLIFF DRIVE 39321 OAK CLIFF DRIVE 30260 SANTIAGO REQUEST POTHOLE CLOGGED STORM DRAIN CLOGGED STORM DRAIN DEBRIS PICK-UP BROKEN TREE LIMB MISSING R-1 DEBRIS CLEAN-UP STORM DRAIN CLEANING TREE TRIMMING BROKEN SIDEWALK BROKEN SIDEWALK TREE TRIMMING STANDING WATER TREE TRIMMING SINKING DRIVEWAY GRAFFITI CHANNEL CLEAN-UP GUTTER REPAIR S.N .S. REPAIR DEBRIS CLEAN-UP DEBRIS CLEAN-UP WANTS DIRT DATE WORK COMPLETED 08/16/00 08/17/00 08/21/00 08/22/00 08/23/00 08/23/00 08/24/00 08/24/00 08/25/00 08/25/00 08/25/00 08/25/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/29/00 08/29/00 08/29/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 46 DATE 08/01/00 08/02/00 08/02/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08~3~0 08~4~0 08~8~0 08/09~0 08~9~0 08/10~0 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 LOCATION YNEZ NORTH OF WINCHESTER RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. EAST OF ClTY LIMITS MARGARITA ROAD N/O RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD DE PORTOLA ROAD BETWEEN MEADOWS & BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN MORAGA AND HUMBER FRONT STREET AT MORENO PAUBA ROAD AT MEADOWS PARKWAY MEADOWS PARKWAY SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA PAUBA ROAD AT MEADOWS PARKWAY PAUBA ROAD AT VIA RAMI 08/11/00 08/11/00 08/11/00 08/11/00 08/11/00 08/11/00 08/11/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/15/00 08/15/00 REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED INSTALLED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE INSTALL REPLACE REINSTALL REPLACE REPLACE MARGARITA SOUTH OF PIO PICO MARGARITA NORTH OF PIO PICO RANCHO VISTA EAST OF MARGARITA RANCHO VISTA EAST OF TEMECULA HIGH RANCHO VISTA WEST OF AVEN1DA DE LA REINA LA SERENA 100' NORTH OF VIA HALCON LA SERENA 150' EAST OF VIA HALCON JEFFERSON SOUTH OF OVERLAND FRONT STREET AT 79 SO. NO. GENERAL KEARNEY 50' E/O CHANTEMAR 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET MARGARITA AT SOLANA WORK COMPLETED R-7 R-2 55 10 R-26-81 COMBO 10 TYPE "K' DELINEATOR MISSING DAMAGED 6 TYPE K W63 4 SR-4 W-65 W-63 R2-45 4 SR-4 3-W63; 3-W65; 5-SR-4; R26-81; 2- W66 SR4 - 1 SR4 - 1 R26-81 COMBO- 1 FADED 1-W66; l-W66A; 1-R26-81 1 - SR-4 I - SR-4 I - SR-4 FIRE TRUCK SIGN - 1 TYPE Qs YELLOW - 14 W-75 - 1 TYPE Qs - 17 R-7 - I DATE 08/15/00 081600 08/16/00 08/16/00 08/16/00 08/16/00 08/17/00 08/17/00 08/21/00 08/21/00 08/21/00 08/22/00 08/23/00 08/23/00 08/24/00 08/24/00 08/24/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 08/30/00 LOCATION PALA ROAD AT 79 SO, MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD LA SERENA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY CHALON AT LA SERENA LA SERENA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY MEADOWS PARKWAY AT CAFERA PALA ROAD LOWER 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET LA SERENA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET SCHOOL SITES REPLACEMENT PROJECT OLD TOWN SCHOOL SITES REPLACEMENT PROJECT PROMENADE HILLS AT CHEMIN CLINET RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT VIA LOS COLINAS SCHOOL SITES REPLACEMENT PROJECT DIAZ AT BLACK DEER LOOP CAMINO ROMO AT RANCHO VISTA RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMEER LOWER 79 AT FRONT STREET CECILIA AT ESCOLACATA PALA ROAD AT WOLF VALLEY FRONT STREET AT SANTIAGO CHARDONNAY HILLS AT LA SERENA MARGARITA AT MORAGA CORTE VERANOS AT VIA POQUITO SOLANA AT VIA NORTE WORK COMPLETED INSTALL REINSTALL REINSTALL REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE REPLACE INSTALL REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED REPLACED INSTALLED REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED R-7 - 2; TYPE K- 2; TYPE K - 2 TYPE Qs - 3 TYPE Qs - 6 SR-4- I W-66 - l; W-66A - 1 W-66-1; W-66A - 1 R-10 14 DELINEATORS 1 DELINEATOR R-7 I DELINEATOR 3 W-63; 2 W-65; 9 SR4; W-66; W66A 2 R-2 "25" 3 SR4; 3 W63; 2 W65 R-I TYPE K 4 - W63; 4 - W65; W54; W66A R-1 T.C. W63; W65 R26/81 DELINEATOR W63; W65 2 CARSONITES R-I 2TYPEK 2 W63 W56 & TYPE N W-53 R2 35 189 11 10 (DAMAGED) (DAMAGED) "MISSING" DATE 08/01/00 08/02/00 08/03/00 08/04/00 08/07/00 08/08/00 08/09/00 08/10/00 08/14/00 08/14/00 08/15/00 08/15/00 08/17/00 08/21/00 08/22/00 08/23/00 08/24/00 08/28/00 08/29/00 08/30/00 08/31/00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 LOCATION CITYWIDE CITYWIDE AREA #3 "SCHOOLS" VIA RAMI AT AMARITA WAY PAUBA ROAD WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY SANTIAGO ROAD AT C STREET MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA LA SERENA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY MARGARITA AT LA SERENA RANCHO VISTA EAST OF HIGH SCHOOL PALA ROAD SOUTH OF 79 SOUTH MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO LEENA WAY AT CAPRI MEADOWS PARKWAY AT RANCHO VISTA AVENIDA DE MISSIONES RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT CALLE TAJO AREA #2 AREA #2 AREA #2 AREA #3 AREA #3 WORK COMPLETED REPAINT YELLOW MEDIANS REPAINT YELLOW MEDIANS REPAINTED 49 LEGENDS REPAINT REPAINT REPA1NT REPAINT REPA1NT REPAINT REPAINT PAINT REPAINT INTERSECTION REPAINT INTERSECTION REPAINT INTERSECTION REPAINT INTERSECTION INSTALLED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED 861 LF 1,599 LF 22 LEGENDS 34 LEGENDS 37 LEGENDS 27 LEGENDS 29 LEGENDS INTERSECTION 30 LEGENDS 25 LEGENDS YELLOW BULL NOSES 90 LN FT 35 LEGENDS 29 LEGENDS 39 LEGENDS 37 LEGENDS 302 L.F. OF 4" YELLOW SKIP 42 LEGENDS 51 LEGENDS 61 LEGENDS 55 LEGENDS 37 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 639 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 2,852 DATE 08/04/00 08/16/0o 08/17/oo 08/28/00 08/28/00 08/31/00 08/31/o0 o8/31/o0 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 LOCATION NICHOLAS ROAD MEADOWS PARKWAY AT CAFERA PALA ROAD AT MUR1FIELD PREECE AT YNEZ ROAD NICHOLAS ROAD AT NO. GENERAL KEARNEY MARGARITA ROAD AT AVENIDA BARCA VIA POQUITO AT CORTE VERANOS SOLANA AT VIA NORTE WORK COMPLETED TRIMMED 5 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL ILO.W. TREES TRIMMED 19 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000 DATE 08/29/00 VIA GILBERTO LOCATION WORK COMPLETED ABATED 275 S.F.R.O,W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 275