Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042297 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE APRIL 22, 1997- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City:Council pursuant to Govemment Code Sections: 1. §54956.9 (c), Conference:with Legal Counsel - Whether'to Initiate Litigation, one matter. 2. §54956.9{b), Conference with LegalCounsel, :Anticipated Litigation, one matter. 3. § 54957,6, Conference:withl Labor Negotiator -Agency: Negotiator: ::Chester Mordasini; Employee organization:: California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees Union 911; City of Temecula, Negotiator: Grant Yates. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:O0 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 97-05 Resolution: No. 97-35 Katie Rubke Reverend Steven Leinhos, New Community Lutheran Church Councilmember Ford Ford, Lindemane, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall R:\Agenda\042297 1 PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS: Certificate of Appreciation - Steve Sander Proclamation - National Mental Health Month - 1997 Proclamation - National Nurses Month Proclamation - Hire-a-Veteran Week Proclamation - National Preservation Week Presentation to the City Council - Murrieta Rotary Club - Jody Lawlor PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:\Agenda\O42297 2 2 4 5 Resolution Approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl. OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Motor Vehicle Fueling Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Motor Vehicle Fueling Agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Unified School District. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 24134-2 (Located at the Southeasterly corner of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 24134-2; 4.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction in the Faithful Performance Street, Water and Sewer Security amounts, release of the faithful performance and labor and material securities; 4.3 Accept substitute securities for faithful performance warranty and labor and materials purposes; 4.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No. 24134-2 (Located at the Southeasterly corner of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24134-2) R:\Agenda~042297 10 Parcel Map No. 28508 (Located at the Southeast Corner of Winchester Road and Country Glen Way) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28508, subject to the Conditions of Approval. Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10, Additional Work RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve an additional cost of $54,000 to complete the improvements for the Walcott Corridor Project, PW94-10. Agreement with GTE California for the Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15, Interchange Improvements IProject No. PW95-12) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute documents. Solicitation of Construction Bids for Citywide Intelligent Traffic Management System - Phase II, Project No. PW95-16 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-16, Citywide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITS) - Phase II. 9.2 Advance $290,590.00 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Improvements Project Fund. All-Way "Stop" - Del Rey Road at Solana Way and Del Rey Road at Avenida Del Reposo RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING ALL-WAY "STOP" SIGN LOCATIONS ON DEL REY ROAD AT SOLANA WAY AND ON DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA DEL REPOSO R:\Agenda~042297 4 11 Approval for RFP for Weed Abatement Services RECOMMENDATION: 1 1.1 Approve the issuance of an RFP for Weed Abatement Services. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING, OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING AND THE OLD TOWN/VVESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY MEETING R:\Agencla~042297 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 97-01 Resolution: No. CSD 97-01 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemarts, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. Release of Warranty Bonds for Butterfield Stage Park - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. (Located at De Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Authorize the release of the Warranty Bond for the construction of Butterfield Stage Park - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc.; 2.2 Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. R:\Agenda\042297 6 3 Amendment No. 1 to Winchester Creek Park Acquisition Aareement RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Winchester Creek Park Acquisition Agreement; 3.2 Authorize staff to deposit $27,000 into the escrow to cover the property taxes as provided in the Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FY1997-98 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agende\042297 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 97-01 Resolution: No. RDA 97-01 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. 2 Amendment to Ground Lease with Dual Development Inc. (Sixth and Front Street) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Second Amendment to Ground Lease by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development, Inc.; 2.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the amendment. R:\Agencia~042297 8 AGENCY BUSINESS 3 Review and Approval of 1996-97 Mid-Year BudGets RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda~042297 9 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in Order: Resolution No.: FA 97-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel F. Lindemarts ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemarts PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the agenda a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda~042297 10 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENTS Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans Resolution: Next in Order: No. IA 97-01 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R;\Agenda\O42297 11 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear'and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 12 13 Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan - Appeal) - the Design and Construction of 20,619 Square Feet of Commercial Development Located at the Southwest Corner of Margarita Road and Pauba Road ITed Zonos Applicant) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; 12.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; 12.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSlON'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 20,619 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.65 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-110-003 Use of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Conduct a public hearing to solicit input from members of the public as to the appropriate use for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. R:~Agenda\042297 12 14 Planning Application No. PA97-0042, Development Code Amendment, Planning Application No. PA97-0016, Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, and Planning Application PA97- 0110, Temecula Municipal Code Amendment RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(A) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW "FORTUNE TELLING, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY" AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES AND AMENDING SECTION 5.04.050 (63) THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FORTUNE TELLING AND RELATED PRACTICES COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Consideration of an Ordinance Prohibiting the Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages and Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places and Prohibiting Engaging in Certain Bodily Functions in Public Places RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDMENT SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEIViECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES 16 Presentation by TCI Cable RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Receive and file report. R:\Agenda~042297 13 17 18 19 2O Temecula Library Presentation RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Review report and provide direction to staff. Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Appointment RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Appoint a member to serve an unexpired term on the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee. Resolution Designating a "Billboard Free" Zone RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING A "BILLBOARD FREE" ZONE IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ITS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets IYnez Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road: Del Rev Road and Via Notre: Moraga Road between Rancho California Road and Margarita Road: Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and State Route 79 South: Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and North City Limits) RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON {1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE (3) MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (5) JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS R:~Agenda~042297 14 21 Review and Aporoval of 1996-97 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda~042297 15 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS City of Temecula CerttJ~cate of Appreciation In heartfelt gratitude from the City Council and the Citizens of Temecula presented to: For his tireless efforts on behalf of the City of Temecula while serving as an inaugural member of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission from October, 1990 to October, 1996. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 8th day of April, 1997 Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor S. Greek, CMC City Clerk City of Teme ul PROCLAMATION WI-IE~S, in a given year, fifty-one ,-illlon American ~tults and children will suffer from a mental disorder such as anxiety, depression, or schizophrenia; and WHEREAS, the different disorders collectively make mental illness the most ~revalent health vroblem in America today -- more common than cancer, lu.~, and heart disease combined; and VFHEREAS, a majority of the people who overcome the fear, discrimi--~tion and mis~,nderstanrling of mental disonter~ And who seek professional help find relief followin~ treatment and most mental illnesses are successfully treated; and V~-I~AS, early recognition and treatment of these problems vastly increases the likelihood of restored health, and family, friends, and co°workers play a key role in reco~zing the early war~ing signs of mental disorders; and WHEREAS, the American public needs to be better educated about mental health, mental illnesses and their treatments, and the inequities that exist in health insurance coverage in order to effect change; and WHEREAS, ~ National Mental Health Association, human services agencies, and other community support organizations have designated one month each year to focus on increasing public awareness and understandin~ of mental health and mental disorders; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor of the ,City of Temecula, California on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of May 1997, as IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 22nd day of April, 1997. Patricia H. Bird 11, Mayor Civ C, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the month of May is designated annually as National Nurses' Month, and WHEREAS, The nur~in~ profession represenf~ one of America's great national WHEREAS, each year nurses contribute to the betterment of their communities through their competence, efficiency, and dedication to healing; and WHEREAS, nurses are a valued and vital part of this community, contributing greatly to the health and well-being of our citizens as they give generously of their time, energy and compassion; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecuh, hereby proclaim the month of May to be in the City of Temecula, and encoure~e the citizens to recognize the nurses of the Temecula Valley and especially of the Raxnona Visiting Nurses Association and Hospice when the nation is observing Na6onal Nurses Month. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the of Temecula ~o be affixed this 22nd day of April, 199 7. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ~ S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the people of c,..~ community have great appreciation and aAmlration for the many local men and women who served their country in the armed forces to protect and preserve the freedoms enjoyed by our community and by all Americans; and WHEREAS, some veterans, including Vietnam and Desert Storm veterans, have encountered obstacles in readjus6ng to civilian llfe; and WHEREAS, veterans, many of them disabled, represent a significant share of our state's homeless population; and WHEREAS, veterans possess a wide variety of valuable job qualifications and skills -- such as experience, maturity, leadership, and loyalty, that make them ideal candidates for employment; and WHEREAS, local Veterans Employment Representatives assigned to Employment Development Department offices are committed to ensuring that veterans receive the services and pro,rams to which they are entitled, and to promoting employer interest in hiring veterans; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, do hereby proclaim May 4-10, 1997, as IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ! have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this g2nd day of April, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor PROCLAMAT][ON WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for man~4ng growth, revltalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability; and VVHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for Americans of all ages, all walks of life and all ethnic backgrounds; and V~HE~AS, it is important to celebrate the role of histoT in our lives and contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tan~ble aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as people; and ~-IEREAS, "Preservation Begins at Home" is the theme for National t~reservation Week 1997, co-sponsored by Old To~n Temecula i~ainstreel Association and ~he .~Tational Trust for Historic t~reservation; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of the ,City of Temecula, hereby proclaim i~ay 11-17 to be IN ~VITNESS V~7HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 29nd day of April, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, i~ayor June $. Greek, CMC, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE. DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,377,796.71. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of April, 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] Resos/LOD I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of April, 1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Resos/LOD 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/03/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/10/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04~22/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/20/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04122/97 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS 001 165 190 191 192 ! 93 19,4 210 280 300 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-ClP iNSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES PAYROLL: 00! ~90 ! 92 193 ! 94 280 300 320 33O 34O GENERAL RDA-LOW/MOD TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-CIP INSURANCE ~NFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPmORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY RETA W~EST~ ACC~JNTING SPECIALIST RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 286,937.15 15646560 792.808.19 141.585,7'7 $ ~, .377 796 71 508,106.37 42401.32 46,529.45 4,552.64 115.47 12.586.99 831.24 474,336.43 86,004.86 20.244.61 9,521.78 1.469.64 29,510.14 1,236,210.94 99.696,97 1.598,48 27,189,08 69.32 173.81 2,711.71 1.049.83 2,81940 803.85 ! ,40943 841.44 3,222.45 141,585,77 ~ 37'779671 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 04/03/97 14:46 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRaJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS AMOUNT 119,791.12 42,054.51 30,948.95 4,445.80 113.40 3,326.35 805.46 33,160.24 3,557.68 15,383.47 4,049.27 631.40 28,669.50 TOTAL 286,937.15 'RE2 ~97 14:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 21705 42640 217056 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 12 2 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 645412 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 665434 66543~ 665434 665434 665434 x 03/31/97 04/01/97 04/02/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 000314 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 SUNRISE ESCROW TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM SUNRISE ESCROW INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IR$) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IR$) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX CEDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) 1ST TIME HOME PRGM:CHAPMAN,S. TVUSD DEVELOPMNT FEES B96-1729 1ST TIME HOME PRGM:BORROWERS,J 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SD] 000444 SD1 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 165-199-999-5449 210-190-808-5804 165-199-999-5449 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 16,980.00 2,160.00 24,000.00 15,090.7b 153.09 3,569.74 8.92 22.13 349.89 158.78 339.42 156.34 415.63 101.15 198.39 3,768.92 54.64 971.88 2.38 6.10 94.3b 38.79 92.03 30.72 66.56 28.42 105.99 40.74 4.40 48.68 1.24 2.28 4.77 4,059.51 53.07 793.16 1.63 3.80 70.28 28.76 108.85 58.86 103.63 23.29 24.09 16,980.00 2,160.00 2~,000.00 25,825.03 5,431.04 .~3 04/03/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001'2310 487.74 VOUCHRE2 04/03/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42643 42643 42643 42643 42643 42643 42644 42645 42645 42645 42645 42645 42645 42646 42647 42647 42648 42649 42650 42650 42651 42652 42653 42653 42654 42655 42655 42656 42656 42656 42656 42656 42656 42656 42656 42656 42656 14:46 CHECK DATE 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 002410 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001149 001323 001323 002569 002005 002005 001260 001267 000596 000596 000135 002719 002719 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 VENDOR NAME A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A WOMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. AUDIO ASSOCIATES BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, L. BUILDING ENERGY CONSULT BUILDING ENERGY CONSULT C P R S CALIFORNIA DEPT OF MOTO CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE AC CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE AC CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CIRO HERNANDEZ PAINTING CIRO HERNANDEZ PAINTING COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUS 'ITEM DESCRIPTION 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP MAR JANITORIAL SVCS-CITY PARKS MISC SUPPLIES FOR AQUATICS MISC SUPPLIES FOR AQUATICS MISC SUPPLIES FOR AQUATICS MISC SUPPLIES FOR AQUATICS FREIGHT TAX MEMBERSHIP: L.COOLEY - 1997 DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY MAINT MISC MATERIALS-DAIS/COUNCIL CH REFUND:DEVEL FEES B96-0293/4/5 RELEASE RETENTION PRJT PW95-16 OVRCHG C01 RETENTION NOT ADJT APRIL BANQT:NELSON:FLOHR:PELLE FEES FOR LICENSE:M.FOSTER CF:R.ROBERTS:LEAG.CA.CITY:4/30 LEAGUE OF CITIES CF:4/30:STONE 10 CHILDREN IN AREA SIGNS CITY HALL PAINTING IMPROVEMENT CREDIT: CARPET CLEANING 000140 600 A&S 000140 600 A&S 000140 800 A&S 000140 800 A&S 000140 800 A&S 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-2310 190-2310 193-2310 280-2310 300-2310 340-2310 190-180-999-5250 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 001-163-999-5226 340-199-701-5240 001-164-601-5240 210-199-650-5804 001-2660 210-2035 210-165-640-5804 190-180-999-5260 190-180-999-5226 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-164-601-5244 340-199-701-5250 340-199-701-5250 001-2330 190-2330 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 001-2330 165-2330 190-2330 193-2330 280-2330 ITEM AMOUNT 8.60 64.90 .52 18.94 4.30 17.20 1,374. O0 25.50 105.00 10.50 9.50 7.10 11.66 185.00 t93.34 47.79 503.49 90.00 7,621.00 6.25- 75.00 58.00 65.00 65.00 335.10 325.00 55.00- 39.75 39.75 66.50 65.56 .94 148.21 12.94 56.17 1.59 12.94 CHECK AMIDLINT 602.20 1,374.00 169.25 185.00 241.13 90.00 7,614.75 75.00 58.00 130.00 335.10 270.00 'RE2 '97 14:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42657 42658 42659 04/03/97 002037 04/03/97 04/03/97 000144 COM-AID, INC. CORAM, CORINNA COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPOR INSTALL CABLE IN NEW MAINT FAC REFUND: CONTRACTED CLASS SUPPLIES-PIZZA CONTEST-4/12/97 210-190-144-5804 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5370 3,984.80 36.00 70.00 3,984.80 36.00 70.00 42660 42661 42661 42662 42663 42664 42665 42666 6 q2666 42666 42667 42667 42668 ~2668 42668 42668 ~2668 42669 42670 42670 42670 42670 42671 42671 42671 42672 04/03/97 002533 04/03/97 001014 04/03/97 001014 04/03/97 002697 04/03/97 002106 04/03/97 002413 04/03/97 001233 04/03/97 001393 04/03/97 001393 04/03/97 001393 04/03/97 001393 04/03/97 001393 04/03/97 001393 COUNTRY FRAMING CCXJNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COLINTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS CREATIVE LIGHTING, INC. DA FAMILY SUPPORT DALEY & HEFT DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKET~ INC. DATA TICKET, INC. 04/03/97 000155 DAVLIN 04/03/97 000155 DAVLIN 04/03/97 000156 04/03/97 000156 04/03/97 000156 04/03/97 000156 04/03/97 000156 04/03/97 002466 04/03/97 001380 04/03/97 001380 04/03/97 001380 04/03/97 001380 04/03/97 002728 04/03/97 002728 04/03/97 002728 04/03/97 000754 04/03/97 000164 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SON EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SON EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SON ELLIOTT GROUP, THE ESGIL CORPORATION FRAME/MAT COUNCIL MISSION STAT CITY SEALS-S.H.PARK/PARKVIEW CITY SEALS-S.H.PARK/PARKVIEW BALLFIELD LIGHTING REPAIR 002106 SUPPORT NOV-DEC 96 LEGAL SERVICES PROPANE GAS SUPPLY/FIELD TANKS AUG PRKING CITATION PROCESSING AUG PRKING CITATION PROCESSING DEC PARKING CITATION PROCESS. DEC PARKING CITATION PROCESS. JAN PARKING CITATION PROCESS. JAN PARKING CITATION PROCESS. COUNCIL MTGS AUDIO/VIDEO PROOU AUDIO COPY-COUNCIL MTG-CTY ATT 000156 DEN-AMIN 000156 DENT-ADV 000156 DENTICAR 000156 DENT-REV 000156 DENTICAR APR ELEVATOR MAINT. FOR CITY TEMP HELP W/E 2/28 - A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 2/28 - A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 2/28 - A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 2/28 D.BRIDGHAM LAB TEST ON EFFLUENT SAMPLE MAR CONSULTING SVCS-WATER SAMP CREDIT: EXCEEDED CONTRACT AMT TCSD PLAN CHECK SERVICES FEB PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-100-999-5250 210-190-626-5802 280-199-805-5802 190-180-999-5212 190-2140 300-199-999-5246 001-164-601-5218 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-120-999-5250 001-2340 001-1180 001-2340 001-1180 001-2340 340-199-701-5250 001-150-999-5119 001'110-999-5119 280-199-999-5119 320-199'999'5118 001-163-999-5248 001-163-999-5248 001-163-999-5248 193-180-999-5248 001'162-999-5248 785.80 75.00 37.50 519.00 100.00 1,642.65 11.74 99.25 99.25 213.50 213.50 470.88 470.87 807.11 16.16 15.00 8.81 8.81 8.81- 8.81 195.00 266.80 266.80 933.78 2,448.63 210.00 161.00 46.00- 1,125.00 4,060.37 785.80 112.50 519.00 100.00 1,642.65 11.74 1,567.25 823.27 32.62 195.00 3,916.01 325.00 1,125.00 4,060.37 .4 04/03/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 190-180-999-5230 19.69 VOUCHRE2 04/03/97 14:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR HUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42674 04/03/97 000165 42674 04/03/97 000165 42674 04/03/97 000165 42674 04/03/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 9.69 9.69 32.14 9.69 80.90 42675 04/03/97 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORT:FRANCISCO 165-199-999-5250 150.00 150.00 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 42676 04/03/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO APRIL-FLAMMER-DISB/LIFE 42678 04/03/97 FROCK, ALAN REFUND: DOG OBEDIENCE 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 001-2380 165-2380 t90-2380 191-2380 192-2380 193-2380 194-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2380 330-2380 340-2380 001-2500 165-2500 190-2500 191-2500 192-2500 193-2500 194-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330'2500 340-2500 001-1170 190-183-4982 606.90 4.25 124.11 .43 1.28 16.16 8.90 13.60 4.25 8.50 8.50 19.12 1,103.67 11.41 225.12 .82 2.05 28.12 12.94 29.00 8.05 21.65 9.26 26.22 1,200.65 12.07 238.17 .86 2.17 29.72 13.71 30.69 8.52 22.91 9.80 27.75 22.08 130.00 3,913.41 130.00 42679 04/03/97 000172 G A S B PUB:G.ROBERTS:5/97-5/98 001-140-999-5228 135.00 135.00 42680 04/03/97 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM LINE 42680 04/03/97 000184 G E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 693-0956 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 163.91 83.87 12 ~ 97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42680 42681 42681 42681 42683 42683 42684 42685 42685 42685 42685 42685 42685 42685 42685 42687 ~2688 42689 ~2689 42690 42691 42691 42692 42692 42693 42693 42693 42693 42693 42694 42695 42695 14:46 CHECK DATE 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000184 001164 001164 001164 000481 000481 000351 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000520 001697 002689 002689 001158 001720 001720 002098 002098 000194 000194 000194 000194 000194 000199 000820 DO0820 VENDOR NAME G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GABRIEL, RICHARD GABRIEL, RICHARD GABRIEL, RICHARD GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM GILLISS, MAX C.M. GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GRACE, DAWN H D L COREN& CONE, INC HALL, NANCY LEE HANDS LABOR SERVICES HANDS LABOR SERVICES HOLIDAY INN HOMETRONICS, INC. HOMETRONICS, INC. HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC K R W & ASSOCIATES K R W & ASSOCIATES CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 909 694-4356 KENT HINTERGARDT APRIL RENT CITY MAINT YARD APRIL RENT CITY MAINT YARD APRIL RENT CITY MAINT YARD JAN PROF SVCS-PARKVIEW JAN PROF SVCS-CITY MAINT. FAC. MUSIC:BIG BAND CONTEST 4/12/97 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES O~FICE SUPPLIES / FINANCE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES / FINANCE DEPT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES - B&S OFFICE SUPPLIES - B&S OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING REFUND: ROOM RENTAL PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVS. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TEMP HELP W/E 3/8 L. WALTERS TEMP HELP W/E 3/23 L. WALTERS ROOM:FAGAN:SUBDIV.WRKSHP:4/18 TELEVISION FOR T.C.C. TAX REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 000194 DEF CC)MP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000199 IRS GARN MAR PROF PLAN CHECK SERVICES CREDIT: WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5208 001-164-601-5234 001-162-999-5234 190-180-999-5234 210-190-626-5804 210-190-144-5804 190-183-999-5370 001-170-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 190-183-4990 001-140-999-5248 190-183-999-5330 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5261 190-184-999-5301 190-184-999-5301 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 193-2080 280-2080 001-2140 001-163-999-5249 001-1182 ITEM AMOUNT 60.55 440.00 88.00 352.00 258.50 3,052.50 800.00 96.92 27.30 125.41 75.51 34.85 111.72 4.84 47.80 130.00 4,800.00 144.00 72.24 180.60 158.46 '498.00 38.60 10.00 12.00 2,450.19 12.50 544.47 9.64 49.82 260.96 1,065.00 18.20- PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 308.33 880.00 3,311.00 809.00 524.35 130.00 4,800.00 144.00 252.84 158.46 536.60 ZZ.00 3,066.62 260.96 1,046.80 VOUCHRE2 04/03/97 14:46 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 42696 04/03/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 42696 04/03/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 42696 04/03/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 42696 04/03/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 42697 04/03/97 002023 KING, WENDE 42698 04/03/97 000206 KINKO'S, INC. 42698 04/03/97 000206 KINKO'S, INC. 42699 04/03/97 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. 42699 04/03/97 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. 42699 04/03/97 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. 42700 04/03/97 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI 42701 04/03/97 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH 42702 04/03/97 002716 LEONARD ENGINEERING 42702 04/03/97 002716- LEONARD ENGINEERING 42703 04/0]/97 M.Y.B.L. - ALL NET 4270~ 0b/03297 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 42705 04/03/97 002666 MASON & MASON REAL ESTA 42705 04/03/97 002666 MASON & MASON REAL ESTA 42706 04/03/97 002619 MEG INVESTMENTS 42707 04/03/97 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 42708 04/03/97 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. 42708 04/03/97 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. C2708 04/03/97 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. 42708 04/03/97 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. 42709 04/03/97 002663 MULTIMEDIA CONNECTIONS 42710 04/03/97 002549 NOEL, BARBARA J. 42711 04/03/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 42711 04/03/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 42712 04/03/97 002640 NORYS, TOM 42712 04/03/97 002640 NORYS, TOM 42713 04/03/97 002652 OSCAR'S 42714 04/03/97 002422 PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY 42714 04/03/97 002422 PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP HELP W/E 3/16 J. EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 3/16 J. EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 3/23 J. EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 3/23 J. EVANS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS COPY SERVICES - PLANNING CREDIT: BILLED INCORRECT AMT TCSD SUPPLIES MISC MAINT. SUPPLIES FOR PW MISC MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PW LIGHTING SERVICE FOR TCSD TRIP TO WELK RESORT-RECREATION PROF SVCS-PARKV[EW FIRE ST. PROF SVCS-PARKV[EW FIRE ST. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT TEMP HELP W/E 3/23 CASTILLO APPRAISAL FOR PAR# 944-300-010 APPRAISAL FOR PAR#~44-330-001 SALES TAX ASSIST 921-7']0-016 REPAIRS TO SANTIAGO ROAD MICROFILM DUPLICATION MICROFILM PROCESSING FREIGHT TAX ADVERTISING UPGRADES ON CD-ROM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROP 208 NOTICE OF ORDINANCE 97-03 CONF ROOM CORD BOARD/CHAIR RAI PAID DEPOSIT @ START OF PRJT CATERING SERVS-DEPT MTG SAN DIEGO YELLOW PGES-PURCHASI FREIGHT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-163-999-5118 001-1(>4-604-5118 190-183-999-5330 001-161-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 190-180-999-5242 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5350 210-190-626-5802 210-190-626-5802 190-2900 001-16G-60&-5118 210-165-601-5700 210-165-601-5700 001-1655 001-164-601-5401 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277' 001-2640 190-183-999-5330 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-5804 190-180-999-5260 001-140-999-5228 001-140-999-5228 ITEM AMOUNT 62.40 353.60 49.92 282.88 340.00 229.79 128.41- 82.43 60.74 172.00 297.00 427.50 1,990.00 1,909.00 100.00 57q.00 1,128,75 916.25 8,728.88 2,500.00 40,00 17.50 15.00 4,46 500,O0 230.40 18,41 21.04 1,400.00 700.00- 60.50 33.00 4,04 CHECK AMOUNT 748.80 340.00 101.38 315.17 297.00 427.50 3,899.00 574.00 2,045.00 8,728.88 2,500.00 76.96 500.00 230.40 39.45 700.00 60.50 'RE2 ~97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42714 42715 42716 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 '17 7 ~/17 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42717 42718 42718 42718 ~2718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 -I8 ~8 14:46 CHECK DATE 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002422 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 VENDOR NAME PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY TAX PATSKO, LINDA PEREZ, JOSE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PER PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PER PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND: CLASS CANCELED REFUND: CLASS CANCELED 000246 PER REDE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS-PRE 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000245 AETNA SO 000245 AETNA $0 000245 AETNA SO 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 CIGNA 000245 CIGNA 000245 FHP 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-140-999-5228 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 001-2130 190-2130 280-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2090 165-2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 300-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 191-2090 192-2090 193-2090 194-2090 280-2090 330-2090 ITEM AMOUNT 2.56 25.00 40.00 195.85 3.34 1.00 15,442.53 153.81 3,064.73 11.02 27.67 379.27 174.72 391.35 139.99 292.08 128.39 353.77 150.20 61.76 .47 13.57 .05 .14 1.78 .97 1.48 .46 .93 .93 2.09 156.86 111.15 111.14 697.00 354.35 574.12 38.28 1,158.88 5,058.18 1,540.49 14.80 37.02 259.02 133.16 38.48 296.00 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 39.60 25.00 40.00 20,994.35 VOUCHRE2 P ~ 04/03/97 14:46 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 42718 CHECK DATE 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 VENDOR NAME CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER · FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH .INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PER5 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PER5 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICR PACIFICR PACIFICR PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS DED PERS-ADM APRIL-FLAMMER-HEALTH INS AETNA SO AETNA SO BLSHIELD FHP HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICR PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS REV 42719 04/03/97 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 ~2720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 42720 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 194-2090 001-2090 280-2090 300-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-1170 165-2090 280-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2122 190-180-999-5212 280-199-999-5260 001-110-999-5223 190-183-999-5320 001-110-999-5260 340-199-701-5212 001-140-999-5262 320-199-999-5221 280-199-999-5260 001-164-601-5260 001-140-999-5260 001-161-999-5260 001-150-999-5260 190-183-999-5320 190-184-999-5301 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 001-164-601-5218 190-181-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 372.91 2,080.92 319.39 12.26 61.30 2,366.82 305.70 101.90 1.835.98 176.54 77.00 908.84 99.81 154.85 92.26 92.25 39.65 17.98 142.54 57.91 11.89 16.85 97.22 6.94 34.72 110.15 57.02 131.46 908.84- 40.62 5.00 6.00 46.56 45.68 30.00 29.94 36.54 25.04 20.69 15.00 20.00 20.00 9.5O 37.80 31.82 32.16 25.38 13.81 35.64 CHECK AMOUNT 19,453.15 40.62 E2 97 14:46 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK HUMBER DATE 42720 04/03/97 42720 04/03/97 42722 04/03/97 42722 04/03/97 42722 04/03/97 42722 04/03/97 42722 04/03/97 42723 04/03/97 42724 04/03/97 42725 04/03/97 42725 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 $ 04/03/97 $ 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42726 04/03/97 42727 04/03/97 42727 04/03/97 42727 04/03/97 42728 04/03/97 42728 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42729 04/03/97 42730 04/03/97 VENDOR HUMBER 000249 000249 000580 000580 000580 000580 000580 000253 001938 001938 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 000262 000262 000262 002291 002291 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 VENDOR NAME PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHOTO WORKS PHOTO WORKS PHOTO WORKS PHOTO WORKS PHOTO I.E)RKS PONPEO, DANIEL A. POSTMASTER PRICE, JOAN F. PRICE, JOAN F. PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. MUTUAL, INC. MUTUAL, INC. MUTUAL, I~C. MUTUAL MUTUAL INC. MUTUAL INC. MUTUAL INC. MUTUAL INC. MUTUAL INC. MUTUAL INC. MUTUAL INC. RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RED DEVIL EQUIPMENT Clam RED DEVIL EQUIPMENT COM RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHMON AMERICA HOMES CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR CIP FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING REFUND: PERMIT FEE LD97-OO6SE EXPRESS MAIL # EM428089879US MINUTE CLERK:RDA MTGS 11/4-2/4 MINUTE CLERK:RDA MTG 3/4/97 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM 001537 DENTALPM APRIL-FLAMMER-DENTAL APRIL COBRA-DENTAL 02-79-10100-1 DIAZ ROAD VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS MAINT PARTS FOR PW MAINT CREW FREIGHT CLAIM ADJ APPROVED:DEC LEGAL DECEMBER LEGAL SERVICES CLAIM ADJ APPROVED:DEC LEGAL DECEMBER LEGAL SERVICES CLAIM ADJ APPROVED:JAN LEGAL CLAIM ADJ APPROVED:FEB LEGAL CREDIT: PER CLAIM ADJUSTER CREDIT: PER CLAIM ADJUSTER CLAIM ADJ APPROVED:NOV LEGAL REFUND: DEVEL FEES:B97-0539 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-181-999-5301 190-184-999-5301 001-165-999-5250 001-164-602-5250 001-164-602-5250 001-163-999-5250 190-180-999-5301 001-163-4380 280-199-999-5230 280-199-999-5250 280-199-999-5250 001-2340 165-2340 190-2340 192-2340 193-2340 194-2340 280-2340 300-2340 330-2340 340-2340 001-1170 001-1180 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-2660 ITEM AMOUNT 12.69 36.80 29.22 11.83 11.22 35.09 8.12 25.00 15.00 100.00 50.00 2,186.59 33.85 369.51 3.39 20.32 47.38 101.55 16.93 25.66 84.62 25.66 93.36 53.07 67.80 3.03 206.92 5.97 2,405.55 1,035.77 2,889.32 238.50 4,616.10 2,613.77 465.00- 310.50- 138.50 47.22 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 536.05 95.45 25.00 15.00 150.00 3,008.82 123.90 292.89 13,162.01 47.22 04/03/97 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR FORWARD PRKING CITATION ASSESS 001-2265 1,050.00 VOUCHRE2 04/03/97 14:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42731 42732 42733 42734 42735 42736 42736 42736 42736 42736 42736 42736 42736 42736 42736 42737 42738 42739 42739 42739 CHECK DATE 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000353 001365 000519 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000375 001497 000305 000305 O00305 VENDOR NAME RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME SHILO HILLTOP SUITES SO CALIF CHAPTER IAEI SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON T R W, INC.-INFORMATION TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TARGET STORE ITEM DESCRIPTION FORWARD PRKING CITATION ASSESS PERMIT RENEWAL FACILITY 38561 IAEI MTG:SMITH,PHIL:04/17/97 IAEI MTG:SMITH,PHIL:4/17 PEST CTRL @ TEM ONE (POLICE) 2-06-560-3235 HWY 79 TCl 2-02-351-4946 6TH STREET 2-00-397-5026 VARIOUS METERS 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS 2-02-351-5489 CITY YARD 2-02-502-8077 VARIOUS METERS 63-77-879-5124-01 HWY 79-TC1 65-77-804-0230-01 HWY-79 TC1 66-77-584-0340-01 CITY HALL 909 202-4757 JG CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS MISC CAMERA SUPPLIES MISC CAMERA SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES-RECREATION CLASS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2260 190-180-999-5250 001-162-999-5261 001-162-999-5261 001-110-999-5223 191-180-999-5319 190-181-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-164-601-5240 340-199-702-5240 191'180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 340-199-701-5240 001-120-999-5208 280-199-999-5250 001-163-999-5242 001-164-604-5242 190-180-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 8,202.50 326.00 176.00 80.00 54.00 26.03 763.70 3,689.54 7,537.57 696.36 92.71 32.42 108.05 580.25 25,189.01 36.87 50.00 13.47 40.39 7.71 CHECK AMOONT 9,252.50 326.00 176.00 80.00 54.00 38,715.6~ 50.00 61.57 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 190-2125 191-2125 192-2125 193-2125 194-2125 280-2125 300-2125 320-2125 443.82 82.00 1.02 2.05 15.38 2.05 2.05 5.13 20.50 574.00 42741 42742 42742 42742 42742 42742 42742 42742 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 000314 000642 000642 000642 000642 000642 000642 000642 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE DRAW 1-ST. CATHERINE'S CHURCH EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 210-190-808-5804 280-1020 001-1020 190-1020 193-1020 300-1020 340-1020 165-1020 3,771.54 452.50 4,315.36 651.66 12.50 10.00 62.50 137.50 3,771.54 5,642.02 42743 04/03/97 002111 TOGO~S CATERING SERVS-MTG 001-120-999-5260 41.75 ' ~E2 PAGE 11 97 14:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42744 42744 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 42745 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 000320 000320 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TITWNE CENTER STATIONERS TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERALLIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES TAX 002107 VL ADVAN 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VL REVER 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 192-2510 193-2510 194-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 192-2510 193-2510 194-2510 340-2510 63.36 4.91 229.40 169.80 48.50 .30 2.35 4.20 4.25 243.65- 169.80 58.48 .30 3.06 4.20 7.81 68.27 458.80 42746 42746 ,,r47 42747 42747 42747 42747 42747 42747 42747 42747 42748 42748 42748 42748 42748 42748 42749 42749 42749 42750 42750 42750 42750 42750 ~0 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 000420 000420 000420 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 002621 002621 002621 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE PRGSS PMT-WESTERN BY-PASS CORR PRGSS PMT-WESTERN BY-PASS CORR PROF SERVS-PVMNT MMNGT PW95-28 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 5305001995902 JS 5305001995878 PB 5305001995894 RR POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT 210-165-612-5802 210-165-612-5802 210-165-655-5802 001-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 340-2160 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 2,957.50 2,000.00 138.16 3,326.20 866.27 5.00 37.50 75.00 5.00 19.98 312.50 112.50 611.40 66.00 730.16 18.56 34.12 71.52 1,104.84 1,182.73 1,820.76 5.27 656.18 95.96 83.49 128.19 568.05 84.47 84.23 5,095.66 4,759.95 1,531.76 4,108.33 VOUCHRE2 04/03/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42750 42750 42750 42750 42750 42751 42751 42751 42751 42752 42753 42754 42754 42754 42755 42756 14:46 CHECK DATE 04/03/97 O4/O3/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 04/03/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 001342 001342 001342 001939 000348 VENDOR NAME UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SE UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, VAN DAELE / WRI ASSN.I. WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY° WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC. ZIGLER, GAIL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT POSTAGE DEPOSIT OO0325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW TEM COMM CTR FLOOR MAT RENTALS REFUND:DEVEL AGREEMNT 74 x S30 BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES - CRC BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES- CRC STORAGE RENTAL FOR APRIL REIMB:REFRESHMENTS/MTG/PRK DED ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 193-180-999-5230 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 190-184-999-5250 001-2660 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 340-199-701-5234 190-180-999-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 97.23 2.38 6.52 105.52 130.56 101.80 2.50 17.00 2.70 101.70 2,220.00 84.78 68.67 80.02 1,071.60 153.91 CHECK AMOUNT 2,048.05 124.00 101.70 2,220.00 233.47 1,071 60 TOTAL CHECKS 286,937.15 'RE2 97 12:27 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 39,155.95 346.81 15,580.50 106.84 2.07 1,810.64 25.78 61,264.09 26,160.39 4,861.14 5,472.51 838.24 840.64 TOTAL 156,465.60 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 04/10/97 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REG%STER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT HUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42757 04/03/97 002468 GENERAL CONSOLIDATED 42759 04/04/97 002468 GENERAL CONSOLIDATED RELEASE STOP NOTICE:GANAHL LUM 210-2038 RELEASE STOP NOTICE:GANAHL 210-2038 35,899.54 2,975.17 35,899.54 2,975.17 42760 04/04/97 002468 GENERAL CONSOLIDATED RELEASE STOP NOTICE:ZEEN PLUMB 210-2038 9,759.15 9,759.15 42764 04/10/97 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS PUB:FIRST AID FAST BOOKLET 001-120-999-5228 6.00 6.00 42765 04/10/97 001947 AMERIGAS 42765 04/10/97 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 201.97 30.71 232.68 42766 04/10/97 002696 ANIMAL AMBASSADORS, INC ANIMAL SHOW-FAMILY FUN NIGHT 42766 04/10/97 002696 ANIMAL AMBASSADORS~ INC ANIMAL SHOW-SPRING FAIR 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 50.00 125.00 175.00 42767 04/10/97 APEX CONSTRUCTION REFUND:GRADING DEPOSIT 42768 04/10/97 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES OLD TOWN RESTROOM LEASE-APR 001-2670 280-199-999-5212 1.000.00 826.00 1,000.00 826.00 42769 04/10/97 000839 C E L S 0 C 97 SUBDIV.MAP ACT/INDEX UPDATE 001-164-604-5228 23.48 23.48 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 ~2770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42770 04/10/97 000128 42771 04/10/97 001004 42772 04/10/97 001590 42772 04/10/97 001590 4277-5 04/10/97 000387 42773 04/10/97 000387 4277~ 04/10/97 000131 42775 04/10/97 001195 42775 04/10/97 001195 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M CARL WARREN & CO.~ INC. CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKERrS COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER~S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKERrS COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER~S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER~S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER'S COMP MARCH 1997 WORKER~S COMP PERMIT FOR MARGARITA COMM PRK CF:HILLBERG:ADAMS:CRA 5/1-2/97 CF:S.NELSON:CRA 5/1-2/97 MTG:GW:AA:DESIGN BROCHURE-4/22 MTG:GW:AA:DESIGN BROCHURE-4/22 LUNA, YOLANDA 4/14/96 APR ALARM MONITORING SVCS-CRC ALARM MONITORING SVC/SR CTR 001-2370 165-2370 190-2370 191-2370 192-2370 193-2370 194-2370 280-2370 300-2370 320-2370 330-2370 340-2370 001-1182 190-183-999-5112 190-181-999-5112 190-180-999-5250 280-199-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 280-199-999-5260 001-110-999-5260 300-199-999-5205 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 3,673.69 46.81 1,398.81 .81 2.07 191.70 25.78 64.89 9.37 21.69 9.53 320.61 18.20 .57 .78 132.00 407.00 230.00 149.00 149.00 106.38 50.00 45.00 5,785.31 132.00 637.00 298.00 106.38 95.00 42776 04/10/97 CLERICl, CAROLYN REFUND: CONTRACTED CLASSES 190-183-4982 60.00 ~E2 '97 12:27 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 4277T 04/10/97 000462 CLUB, THE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 748.80 748.80 42778 04/10/97 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 42778 04/10/97 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET (3) HANDHELD RADIOS TAX 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 1,758.96 136.32 1,895.28 42779 04/10/97 002684 D B CONVERSIONS/ INSTALL BENCH SEAT/TCSD VEBICL 190-180-999-5214 200.00 200.00 42780 04/10/97 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. 42780 04/10/97 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. FEB PARKING CITATION PROCESS FEB PARKING CITATION PROCESS 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 73.00 73.00 146.0g 42781 04/10/97 002321 DI MEGLIOo KATHY INFORMATION MGMT WEEK EVENT 001-120-999-5277 138.22 138.22 42782 04/10/97 001454 DISNEYLAND HOTEL NON-REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 001-2930 350.00 350.00 42783 04/10/97 002712 ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN 42784 04/10/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 42784 04/10/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 42784 04/10/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 42784 04/10/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE '~4 04/10/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAR ECONOMIC CONSULTING SVCS LDSC MAINT-SPORTS PARK LDSC MAINT/MARTINIQUE-R.VISTA LDSC MAINTENANCE-RIDGEVIEW LDSC IMPROVEMENTS-VINTAGE HILL S-8 VILLAGES MAINLINE REPAIR 280-199-999-5248 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5212 1,000.00 188.96 240.00 175.00 120.00 20.84 1,000.00 744.80 ,=~85 04/10/97 002742 FARRINGTON, ROBIN 42785 04/10/97 002742 FARRINGTON, ROBIN 42785 04/10/97 002742 FARRINGTON, ROBIN 42785 04/10/97 002742 FARRINGTON, ROBIN 42785 04/10/97 002742 FARRINGTON, ROBIN (20) BOXES OF EASTER EGGS (36) BLOW-UP RABBITS TAX BALLOONS/SPRING EGG HUNT AREAS TAX 190-183o999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 100.00 21.60 9.42 247.50 19.18 397.70 42786 04/10/97 002754 ~2787 04/10/97 000166 42787 04/10/97 000166 FINELINE BUILDERS, INC. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO TENANT IMPROVEMENTS/SUB-ST.P.D LOT BOOK REPORT:LEATH LOT BOOK REPORT:CORTES 001-170-999-5610 165-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5250 4,275.00 150.00 150.00 4,275.00 300.00 42788 04/10/97 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT/PHYSICALS 001-150-999-5250 85.00 85.00 42789 04/10/97 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 109.91 109.91 42790 04/10/97 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-8927:GENERAL USAGE 42790 04/10/97 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699'0590:ALARM LINES PTA 320-199-999-5208 320-199'999-5208 79.70 55.09 134.79 42791 04/10/97 002141 GEIS, PAUL 42792 04/10/97 000173 42792 04/10/97 000173 42793 04/10/97 000177 42793 04/10/97 000177 42793 04/10/97 000177 -~3 04/10/97 000177 ; 04/10/97 00017-/ x3 04/10/97 000177 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA GENERAL BINDING CORPORA GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT REPAIR OF POLICE MOTORCYCLES OFFICE EQUIP-MAINT AGREEMENT OFFICE EQUIP-MAINT AGREEMENT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES OFFICE FURNITURE FAX/PRINTER MACHINE-TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5214 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 001-140-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 100.00 449.00 230.00 74.46 55.08 12.90 65.46 666.15 1,044.10 100.00 679.00 VOUCHRE2 3 04/10/97 12:27 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 42793 04/10/97 000177 42794 04/10/97 000192 42794 04/10/97 000192 42794 04/10/97 000192 42795 04/10/97 002129 42796 04/10/97 000186 42796 04/10/97 000186 42796 04/10/97 0001~ 42797 04/10/97 42798 04/10/97 002409 42799 04/10/97 42800 04/10/97 42801 04/10/97 002207 42802 04/10/97 000939 42803 04/10/97 000388 42804 04/10/97 002481 42805 04/10/97 001186 42806 04/10/97 002629 42807 04/10/97 000206 42807 04/10/97 000206 42807 04/10/97 000206 &2808 04/10/97 000945 42808 04/10/97 000945 42808 04/10/97 000945 42809 04/10/97 002499 42810 04/10/97 000869 42811 04/10/97 002282 42812 04/10/97 000217 42812 04/10/97 000217 42813 04/10/97 000220 42813 04/10/97 000220 VENDOR NAME GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GREAT NEST CONTRACTORS, HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARRIS, CHARLENE HAZ PAK INC. HEISERMAN, C.CRAIG & RY HENNEFORTH, LARRY HTE PROGRAMMED FOR SUCC I C B 0 * INLAND EMPIRE I C B O, INC. INLAND FOUNDATION ENGIN IRWIN, JOHN J S A PUBLISHING CONSUL KINKO'S, INC. KINKO'S, INC. KINKOf S, INC. L P S COMPUTER SERVICE L P S COMPUTER SERVICE L P S COMPUTER SERVICE L.D. KING, INC. LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TN LIEBER, CARON MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION OFFICE SUPPLIES - B&S COMPUTER ACCESSORIES FREIGHT TAX RELEASE STOP NOTICE:PARKVIEW MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND:AQUATICS CITY YARD HAZMAT MATERIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM 96-202 BUILDING PERMIT WITHDRAWN SALES TAX ON INVOICE ~3408 MEMBERSHIP:A. ELMO 1997 SEMINAR:P.ZUNA:ICBO 5/19-20/97 PROF SVCS-6TH ST PARKING LOT. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS VISITOR GUIDE REPRINT STATIONERY PAPER/M[SC SUPPLIES PRINTING FOR TEM POLICE DEPT. MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES PRINTER MAINT.AGREEMENT-APR REFURB TONER CARTRIDGE TAX MAR PROF SVCS-NINCHESTER/I-15 TRIP TO NELK RESORT-RECREATION TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS NEIGHBORHOO0 POLICING BROCHURE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5220 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 210-2038 190-180-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 340-199-701-5212 190-183-4982 001-164-601-5430 300-199-999-5207 001-162-4285 320-199-999-5211 001-162-999-5226 001-162-999-5261 280-199-804-5804 190-183-999-5330 280-199-999-5270 330-199-999-5220 001-170-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 320-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 280-199-602-5801 190-183-999-5350 190-183o999-5330 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 001-110-999-5223 001-110-999-5223 ITEM AMOUNT 6O.73 79.90 8.73 6.42 3,770.90 46.46 102.58 102.14 75. O0 866.50 1,077.49 60.00 102.30 25.00 210.00 46.00 444.00 16,162.50 29.17 106.51 87.92 310.76 616.00 47.74 3,819.00 256.50 192.00 512.40 994.60 166. O0 12.86 CHECK AMOUNT 1,978.88 95.05 3,770~90 251.18 75.00 866.50 1,077.49 60.00 2~.00 210.00 46.00 444.00 16.162.50 223.60 974.50 3,819.00 256.50 192.00 1,507.00 11o.~6 "RE2 CITY OF TEMECULA /97 12:27 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[00S PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42814 04/10/97 MCFADDEN, JACQUELINE REFUND:OUT OF CITY LIMITS 001-199-4056 20.00 20.00 42815 04/10/97 000226 MICRO AGE C(~MPUTER CENT COMPUTER EQUIP-FIRE STATION 210-190-626-5610 42815 04/10/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT COMPUTER EQUIP-FIRE STATION 210-190-626-5610 42815 04/10/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 210-190-626-5610 42815 04/10/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT INTERNAL DRIVE BACK-UP 4000R 320-1970 42815 04/10/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 320-1970 42816 04/10/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS QTY 3500 CITY SEAL ENVELOPES 001-110-999-5222 42816 04/10/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-110-999-5222 330.00 49.00 29.37 3,016.00 233.74 309.44 23.98 3,658.11 333.q2 42817 04/10/97 001868 MIYAMOTO-JUROSKY, SUSAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 153.60 153.60 42818 04/10/97 001892 MOBILE MODULAR MAR INTERIM FIRE STATION LEASE 001-171-999-5470 42818 04/10/97 001892 MOBILE MODULAR MAR INTERIM FIRE STATION LEASE 001-171-999-5470 42819 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS 1997 HONDA ATV FOR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5610 42819 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS DOCUMENT FEE FOR ATV 001-170-999-5610 42819 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS LICENSE FOR ATV'S 001-170-999-5610 42819 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS TAX 001-170-999-5610 ~19 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS 1997 HONDA ATV FOR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5610 9 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS DOCUMENT FEE FOR ATV 001-170-999-5610 ..d19 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS LICENSE FOR ATV'S 001-170-999-5610 42819 04/10/97 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS TAX 001-170-999-5610 42820 04/10/97 NOLTA, LISA REF:CLEANING/SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 975.14 7-58.09 3,963.00 35.00 21.00 309.85 3,963.00 35.00 21.00 309.85 100.00 1,713.23 8,657.70 100.00 J282! 04/10/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT LEGAL ADVERTlSEMENTS-PA96-0293 001-120-999-5256 42.08 42.08 42822 04/10/97 NUNEZj ALLEN REIMB:SW CO ALLIANCE:4/4/97 c2823 04/10/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE q282~ 04/10/97 002652 OSCARrS ~2825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET ~2825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42825 04/10/97 001561 PAGENET 42826 04/10/97 000580 PHOTO WORKS ,2826 04/10/97 000580 PHOTO WORKS ~26 04/10/97 000580 PHOTO WORKS POSTMASTER - TEMECULA 04/10/97 002185 MANAGEMENT QTRLY MEETING APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE APRIL RENTAL & PAGING SERVICE PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR LAND DEV. PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR LAND DEV. PHOTO DEVELOPMENT AND FILM POSTAGE FOR RDA REPORT MAILING 001-2930 001-162-999-5214 001-150-999-5265 001-163-999-5250 001-164-601-5238 001-165-999-5238 001-164-604-5208 001-100-999-5250 001-120-999-5250 320-199-999-5238 001-162-999-5238 001-170-999-5242 190-180-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 190-180-999-5301 280-199-999-5230 7-51.87 8.57 355.63 15.00 15.00 15.00 7.50 15.00 7.50 29.33 37.50 70.00 99.97 3.76 16.67 13.54 2,996.38 731.87 8.57 355.63 311.80 33.97 2,996.38 VOUCHRE2 F 5 04/10/97 12:27' VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42828 42828 42828 42829 42830 42830 42830 42830 42830 42830 42830 42830 42830 42830 42831 42831 ~2831 42831 42831 42831 42831 ~2832 42832 42832 42832 42832 42833 42833 42833 42834 C2835 42836 42837 42837 42838 42838 42839 42840 CHECK DATE 04/10/97' 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10197 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002214 002214 002214 000947' 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 000266 000266 000266 000352 001365 000268 000271 000271 000873 000873 000403 000818 VENDOR NAME RANCHO AUTO UPHOLSTERY RANCHO AUTO UPHOLSTERY RANCHO AUTO UPHOLSTERY RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT ROBERT BEIN, W'M FROST & ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & ROBERTS, RONALD H. ROBERTS, RONALD H. SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION RE-UPHOLSTER 6 OFFICE CHAIRS RE-UPHOLSTER 6 OFFICE CHAIRS TAX MISC. BLUEPRINTS & SUPPLIES 01-06-84300-1:FRONT STREET VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS 01-06-84860-4:PUJOL STREET VARIOUS WATER METERS VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE MAINT/DETAIL-LAND DEV. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. FEBRUARY 97 LEGAL SERVICES FEBRUARY 97 LEGAL SERVICES FEBRUARY LEGAL SERVICES FEBRUARY LEGAL SERVICES FEBRUARY LEGAL SERVICES APR PORT.TOILET RENTAL/RIVERTO APR PORT.TOILET RENTAL/NICOLAS APR PORT TOILET RENT-CITY YARD ASSESSOR MAP COPY POOL/SPA PERMIT RENEWAL 1997' FEB 97 K-RAT FEES PROF SVC-OSCAR'S/TEM DUCK POND FEB PROF SVC5/I-15-79(S) REIMB:LEAGUE CA CITIES:3/19-20 REIMB:CPRS CONF:3/14-16/97 MAR POOL MAINT SVCS/TEM ELEM RELEASE OF RETENTION-PW95-14 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-164-604-5268 001-164-601-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181o999-5240 190-104o999-5240 191-180o999-5240 193-180-999-5240 280-199~807-5804 340-199-999-5240 001-162~999-5214 001-162-999-5263 001-110-999-5214 001-110-999-5263 001-163-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5263 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 001-164-601-5238 190-180-999-5220 190-182-999-5250 001-2300 190-180-999-5250 210-165-662-5804 001-100-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5212 210-2035 ITEM AMOUNT 326.00 129.50 10.04 6.47 11.19 66.92 318.09 2,907.12 89.75 131.62 106.03 1,063.10 260.37 345.68 50.00 15.03 10.00 12.91 27.10 26.28 62.28 1,404.57 2,388.00 2,950.90 345.72 371.28 62.89 172.50 57.39 7.00 420.00 510.00 350.00 1,445.46 13.00 86.17 155.30 7,005.50 CHECK AMOUNT 465.54 6.47 5,299.87 203.60 7,460.47 292.78 7.00 420.00 510.00 1,795.46 99.17 155.30 7,L '~E2 PAGE b 97 12:27 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42841 42842 42843 42843 42844 42845 42845 42846 42846 42847 42848 42849 '~,9 42850 42851 42852 42852 42852 42852 42853 42853 42853 42853 42853 42853 42853 42854 42854 42854 42854 42854 42854 42855 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 SMITH, MARTY 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T 002699 SPORTWIDE 002699 SPORTWIDE 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMB:SW CO ALLIANCE CF:4/4/97 PEST CONTROL SVCS-CTY HALL-MAR 2-00-397-5042:CITY FACILITY 66-1r7-795-8087-O1-OOO-6:MORENO TCSD VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR 15 HOODED SWEATSHIRTS-RECREATN FREIGHT OFFICE EQUIPMENT FOR PW TAX 000168 TEMECULA FLOI./ER CORRAL FLOWERS TEMECULA HOOPSTERS BOOS 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY C0. 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 001921 001921 001921 001921 TRANSAMERICA INFORMATIO TRANSAMERICA INFORMATIO TRANSAMERICA INFORMATIO TRANSAMERICA INFORMATIO 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI REF:SECURITY/CLEANING DEPOSIT AWARDS FOR HOLIDAY LIGHTS AWARDS FOR SPRING EGG HUNT EMP OF QTR PLAQUES TCSD MAINT/REPAIR-PARK/REC FAC OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PU ADMIN. APR-JUN 97 INFO MGMT SVCS APR-JUN 97 INFO MGMT SVCS APR-JUN 97 INFO MGMT $VCS APR-JUN 97 INFO MGMT SVCS 5415305001995928-MJM-MARCH 5415305001995928-MJM-MARCH 5415305001995928-MJM-MARCH 5415305001995928-MJM-MARCH 5415305001995969-G.T.-MARCH 5305001995944:AE:MAR 5305001995951:SN:MAR MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES HP SCANNER FOR TEM POLICE TAX KODAK CAMERA FOR TEM POLICE TAX MAR PROF CONSULTING SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2930 340-199-701-5250 340-199-701-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5214 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 001-164-604-5242 001-164-604-5242 001'2170 190-2900 190-183-999-5370 190-183'999-5370 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5212 001-164-604-5220 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5211 001-110-999-5228 280-199-999-5258 001-110-999-5250 280-199-999-5270 001-16t-999-5260 001-162-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-162-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 940.41 56.00 16.21 58.90 23.99 314.25 10.00 400.00 31.00 106.67 100.00 17.78 170.35 156.54 23.96 106.52 323.75 73.75 24.75 75.00 178.20 421.25 60.34 8.00 73.72 8.02 1~720.50 150.31 217.55 879.00 68.12 679.00 52.62 1,879.24 CHECK AMOUNT 940.41 56.00 75.11 23.0~ 324.25 431.00 106.67 100.00 344.67 23.96 106.52 497.25 2,470.03 2,046.60 1,879.24 04/10/97 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES/SR CTR 190-181-999-5212 130.28 ~6 04/10/97 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CRC - BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES 190-182~999-5212 80.02 210.30 VCXJCHRE2 04/10/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42857 42858 42858 12:27 CHECK DATE 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/10/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002109 002473 002473 VENDOR NAME WHITE CAP YUCAIPA AUTO & TRAILER YUCAIPA AUTO & TRAILER CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TANDEM AXLE TRAILER-TEM POLICE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-16Z~-601-5218 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 ITEM AMOUNT 43.98 2,150.00 166.63 CHECK AMOUNT 43.98 2,316.63 TOTAL CHECKS 15~,~65.60 '~E2 .~? 13:15 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP AMOUNT 349,159.30 7,450.00 379,912.10 56,286.79 TOTAL 792,808.19 VOUCHRE2 · 1 04/10/97' 13:15 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42861 42861 42861 42862 42863 42863 42863 42863 42864 42865 42865 42865 42865 42866 42866 42866 42867 42868 CHECK DATE 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 04/22/97 VENDOR NUMBER 001009 001009 001009 002577 001056 001056 001056 001056 001550 002468 002468 002468 002468 002416 002416 002416 002499 000267 VENDOR NAME D B X, INC. D B X~ INC. D B X, INC. ENGINEERING RESOURCES EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE FIRST PACIFIC NATIONAL GENERAL CONSOLIDATED GENERAL CONSOLIDATED GENERAL CONSOLIDATED GENERAL CONSOLIDATED GENESIS CONSTRUCTION GENESIS CONSTRUCTION GENESIS CONSTRUCTION L.D. KING, INC. RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION CONDUIT RANCHO CAL/I-15 CONTINGENCY-CONDUIT-R.CAL/I-15 C/O #1 CONDUIT RANCHO CAL/I-15 FEB PROF SRVCS-O.T STUDY SADDLEWOO0 LDSC IMPROVEMENTS HONEYSUCKLE 100 FLATS SIGNET SERIES LDSC IMPROVEMNTS RIDGEVIEW (S-7) - LANDSCAPE RET TO ESCROW ACCT-WALCOTT CREDIT:GTH ST PARKING PMT #7 RETENTION CHANGE DUE TO CREDIT MARCH PRGSS PMT 6TH ST PRKGING RETENTION W/H 6TH ST PMT #7 C/O 1-9 MARCH SRVCS WALCOTT MARCH PRGSS PMT #8-WALCOTT RETENTION W/H PMT #8-WALCOTT MARCH PROF SRVCS-WINCHESTER OCT-DEC 1996 FIRE SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-165-640-5804 210-165-640-5804 210-165-640-5804 280-199-999-5248 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 210-1035 280-199-804-5804 210-2035 280-199-804-5804 210-2035 210-165-637-5804 210-165-637-5804 210-2035 280-199-602-5801 001-171-999-5251 ITEM AMOUNT 16,688.00 1,668.80 8,043.70 9,516.40 1,000.00 1,500.00 2,250.00 2,700.00 35,636.79 18.00- 1.80 28,581.39 2,858.1~- 48,313.94 308,054.00 35,636.79- 18,207.00 349,159.30 CHECK AMOUNT 26,400.50 9,516.40 35,636.79 25,707.05 320,- 18,20~.U0 349,159.30 TOTAL CHECKS 792,808.19 ITEM 3 APPROVAL ~,. CITY 'ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director ~' April 22, 1997 Motor Vehicle Fueling Agreement PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached Motor Vehicle Fueling Agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Unified School District. DISCUSSION: Currently, the City is using SKS, Incorporated Petroleum Distributors for the routine refueling of all City vehicles. The most recent prices charged by SKS are $1.46 for regular unleaded, $1.60 for mid-grade unleaded, and $1.66 for premium unleaded gasoline. Most City vehicles must use SKS's mid-grade unleaded gasoline because the vehicles experience "knocking" when the regular unleaded gasoline is used. The Temecula Valley Unified School District ("District") Maintenance, Operations, and Transportation (MOT) Facility is equipped with several refueling pumps which dispense mid- grade unleaded gasoline (minimum 89 octane). Because of the volume of gasoline purchased by the District, the cost per gallon to the District is currently $1.07 per gallon. If the City uses the MOT Facility for refueling, the charge to the City will be the cost to the District plus an additional indirect cost rate of 4.01%. An analysis of current market conditions shows that the current cost to the City using the MOT Facility would be $1.11 per gallon, providing a savings of $.49 per gallon over SKS's current prices. Thus, for atypical City vehicle which requires an average of 40 gallons of gasoline per week, the savings escalate to over $1,000 per year per vehicle. Under the terms of the proposed agreement, each vehicle will be assigned a key with a specific personal identification number (PIN) to account for fuel being purchased and to allow Staff to access the facility and pumps 24 hours a day. At the time of the preparation of this Staff Report, the proposed agreement was scheduled to be presented to the TVUSD Governing Board at their regularly scheduled meeting on April 15, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: Use of the District's MOT Facility for refueling will potentially save the City over $25,000 per year in fuel costs. Attachments: Motor Vehicle Refueling Agreement Between City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Unified School District MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 22nd day of April 1997, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "City," and TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "District." In consideration of the covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties agrees are true and correct: a. The City operates and maintains various motor vehicles and special equipment in the performance of City functions, which vehicles require frequent refueling: b. The District owns and operates a Maintenance, Operations, and Transportation ("MOT") Facility located at 40516 Roripaugh Road in Temecula, which facility has refueling pumps on the premises; c. The District is capable of providing refueling services to the City's fleet of vehicles and equipment; d. It is economically advantageous for the City to contract with the District to utilize the District facility to refuel; and e. It is economically advantageous for the District to provide refueling services for the City' so as to take advantage of greater discounts in purchasing motor vehicle fuel. 2. District agrees to sell motor vehicle fuel to the City for its motor vehicles and special equipment and to provide City with access to the MOT Facility for the purpose of obtaining fuel for City vehicles and special equipment in accordance with the following provisions' (a) Use of the MOT Facility by City personnel shall be limited to the refueling stations located in the MOT Facility yard, at such times as are mutually agreeable to both parties. Generally, the City shall use said area at such times and in a manner so as not to interfere with normal District operations. The City Manager and Superintendent, or their designees, shall cooperate in the preparation of a schedule indicating the preferred times for access of the refueling stations by City vehicles and equipment. (b) District shall provide the City with a key for each vehicle and a unique personal identification number (PIN) which provides access to the MOT facility and fuel distribution system 24 hours a day. [I:\DATA\148\TVUSD.AGM] (c) The individual keys with PIN's will be coded to allow the City to monitor fuel charges by key holder. (d) City agrees to compensate District for District's direct cost for fuel, based on current market prices which District has paid for the fuel, plus an indirect cost rate for administration which is calculated by the District annually for each fiscal year and is based on the indirect cost rate for administration of fuel services utilized and certified by the County of Riverside ("Indirect Cost Rate"). The Indirect Cost Rate for to be applied to City purchases of fuel from May 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 shall be four and one thousandths percent (4.01%). For each fiscal year thereafter beginning on July 1. 1998. District shall calculate the Indirect Cost Rate and shall notify the City of the Indirect Cost Rate and the methodology and data used to calculate it on or before June 1 of each year. (e) District shall invoice the City for fuel on a monthly basis. Invoices shall provide a breakdown of fuel costs per each card held by the City and shall show the direct cost of the fuel and the Indirect Cost Rate separately. (f) City Finance Department shall pay all invoices within 30 days of receipt of an approved invoice. 3. District shall defend, indemnify and hold and save the City harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for injury to persons or damage to property which may arise by reason of any dangerous or defective condition of District property or negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of District personnel. City shall defend, indemnify and hold and save the District harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for injury, to persons or damage to property which may arise by City's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions while on the premises of the MOT Facility or utilizing District property pursuant to this Agreement. 4. This Agreement shall be effective as of May 1, 1997 and shall remain in full force and effect until June 30, 1999, unless sooner terminated. Either party may terminate this Agreement, at any time and for any reason, with or without cause. upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to the other. 5. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail. postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 [I:\DATA\148\TVUSD.AGM] 2 To District: Attention: City Manager Temecula Valley Unified School District 31350 Rancho Vista Road Temecula, California 92592 Attention: Superintendent [I :\DATA\ 148\TVUSD.AGM] 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly approved and executed by their respective officers as of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Patricia H. Birdsall Mayor Linda Campbell President, Governing Board of Education APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson City Attorney June Greek, City Clerk Richard Sharer Clerk of the Governing Board [I:\DATA', 148x, TV USD.AGM] 4 ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~'~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 24134-2. (Southeasterly corner of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 24134-2, AUTHORIZE the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction in the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer Security amounts, release of the faithful performance and labor and material securities, ACCEPT substitute securities for faithful performance warranty and labor and materials purposes, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 24134-2, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Bedford Development Co. 27755 Ynez Road, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92591 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Instruments of Credit issued by Butterfield Financial Corporation as follows: In the amount of $1,368,000 ($1,068,000, $146,000, and $154,000, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. In the amount of $684,000 ($534,000, $73,000, and $77,000, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. In the amount of $28,500 to cover subdivision monumentation. I R:~AG DRPT\97\0422\TR241342.ACC Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements. Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Security amount as follows: Streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements $1,231,200 The Faithful Performance warranty security amount will be maintained as follows: Streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements $136,800 The developer has submitted substitute bonds in the appropriate amounts, with The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company as surety, as follows: Bond No. 10869980-96-039 in the amount of $136,800 for faithful performance warranty. Bond No. 10869980-96-038 in the amount of $684,000 for labor and materials. The subdivision monumentation has not yet been reviewed and confirmed. This work will be presented for acceptance and release at a later date. The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are Via Cerda, Corte Rimola, Via Gandia, and portions of Cala Carrasco, Calle Veronica, Pauba Road, and Margarita Road. Margarita Road in this reach was a part of the County Maintained-Road System prior to incorporation and became part of the City Maintained-Street System by succession on December 1, 1989. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map Substitute Bonds (On file) 2 R:LhGDRFr\97\0422\TR241342.ACC VICINITY MAP / / I / I Tract No. 24134-2 Loca:':ion Mau NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ..APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~'(~~:~.-.~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager 'q~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 24134-2) (Southeasterly corner of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) PREPARED BY:~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24134-2) BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract No. 24134-2 on April 9, 1991, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements for construction of street and drainage, and water and sewer improvements with Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation. The City Council accepted the public improvements for this tract on April 22, 1997, and initiated the faithful performance warranty period. The public streets being accepted by this action are Via Cerda, Corte Rimola, Via Gandia, and portions of Cala Carrasco, Calle Veronica, and Pauba Road. Margarita Road was part of the County Maintained-Road System prior to incorporation, and became part of the City Maintained-Street System by succession on December 1, 1989). FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. R: ~,AG D RF'I~97~0422\TR241342. MST RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACC~G CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINEI)-STREET SYSTEM (WITHEN TRACT NO. 24134-2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WlIF~REAS, The City of Temecula accepted offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation, with the recordation of Tract Map No. 24134-2. and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 24134-2 on April 22, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of April, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk SEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 97-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of April, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: RAAGDRtrI~97\0422\TR241342, MST EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 24134-2, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained-Street System as described below: Those lots described as Lots "A" through "G" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 24134-2, f'ded 18 May 1991, in Book 230 of Maps, Pgs 93-101 Incl., further described as follows: Lot "A"* Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Lot 'E" Lot "F" Lot "G" Portion of Margarita Road Portion of Pauba Road Via Cerda Corte Rimola Via Gandia Portion of Cala Carraseo Portion of Calle Veronica * Margarita Road was a part of the County Maintained-Road System prior to City incorporation and became part of the City Maintained-Street System by succession on December 1, 1989. R:\AG DRPT\97\0422 \TR241342 .MST EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE -PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: NOTE: ~S NOT TO SCALE T EGFZ'm STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED !lsrI'0 CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM I'I'P_;M 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: FINANCE D I R E C~)~I'~---~~ CITY MANAGER )~ ~f,)~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 Parcel Map No. 28508, located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road and Country Glen way PREPARED BY: ,~'.~Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development J~J//[4Gerald L. Alegria, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Parcel Map No. 28508 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 28508, was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Manager, DebbieUbnoske, on March 6, 1997. The Developer, Land Grant Development, has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Parcel Map No. 28508 is a four (4) parcel commercial subdivision, of 2.31 net acres, located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road (Hwy 79 North) and Country Glen Way. The site is currently vacant. The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 28508: Public Facilities Deposit Signal Mitigation Fee FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Project Location Map Parcel Map No. 28508 Fees & Securities Report Due prior to issuance of a building permit Due prior to issuance of a building permit r:\agdr~t\97\0422\PM 2 B608.rnao/~a CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Parcel Map No. 26232-2 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Flood Control (ADP) Public Facility Deposit Traffic Signal Mitigation CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Not in an Area Drainage Plan To be paid prior to issuance of building permit To be paid prior to issuance of building permit r:\egdrl=t\g 7 \0422\PM2860 B.ma~/~& CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 28508 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage MONUMENT TOTAL FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY 3,195.90 1,400.00 4,595.90 DATE: April 9, 1997 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY 1,597.95 0.00 1,597.95 Maintenance Retention $ Monument Security $ 320.00 1,400.00 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Signal Mitigation Fee - Deferred to Bldg Permit Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees/Deposit SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due 0.00 None 5,775.00 N/A T.B.D.* 105.00 8.00 830.00 0.00 250.00 1,193.00 0.00 * T.B.D. - To Be Determined r:\egdrpt~,97 \0422\PM 2850 B.rna~/~, I~I'EM 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL ~,, CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC"~O~ CITY MANAGER J~. ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer April 22, 1997 Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10- Additional Work PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an additional cost of $54,000 to complete the improvements for the Walcott Corridor Project, PW94-10. BACKGROUND: On June 11, 1996 City Council awarded a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50 along with a contingency amount of $171,663.75. During the construction period several changes from the submitted plans to the actual construction improvements have been required to complete the necessary improvements through the change order process. Some of these changes were additional requests not included in the original plans or required improvements that were not incorporated on the plans. However, the major extra work item is related to the estimated earth work quantities and the actual in-place amounts. After the error was discovered, and discussion with the designer for this project it was determined that a portion of the higher quantities was related to a clerical error in requiring material be imported instead of exported from the site. This along with additional amounts of grading that was required to achieve the design elevations for the roadway increased the amount of work required to construct the project. We are in the process of addressing these concerns with the designer as well as reimbursement of the cost relating specifically to the grading issues. A total of $56,520.00 of the contingency has been spent on these grading items with an estimated $18,000.00 in additional work for a total of $74,250.00. As a result of these changes staff has used almost the entire contingency amount for the project and now require an additional $54,000 to complete the improvements for the project. R:~AGDRPT\97 \0422\FSN94-10,C CO The following items are additional estimated quantities or additional cost over the 10% authorized will be required to complete the project, which would result in a change to the contract: Estimated Cost 1. Aggregate base material quantities ......................... $8,525 2. Asphalt concrete pavement quantities ....................... $12,875 3. Excess dirt material and additional grading ................... $18,000 4. Installing larger water meter boxes ......................... $5,000 (To be reimbursed by RCWD) Construction of 'V'-ditch ................................ TOTAL: $9.600 $54,000 FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount of $54,000 being requested to complete the Walcott Corridor Project is available in the project account. R:~AGDRPT~97\0422U~¥94-10.CCO ITEM 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 Agreement with GTE California for the Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15, Interchange Improvements (Project No. PW95-12) PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer- Capital Projects Steven W. Beswick, Project Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Interagency Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute documents. BACKGROUND: Based on discussion at the City Council meeting on March 22, 1997, the City Council provided direction to pursue additional negotiation of a phased payment program as well as approval and guarantee that the Income Tax Component (ITC) would not be included in the costs. GTE was contacted and has agreed to a modified agreement to provide for a phased payment program (i.e. 40-30-30) and has guaranteed that the Income Tax Component (ITC) fee which is normally charged by the Public Utilities Commission for private development projects would not be included in the costs. The City will pay GTE the sum of $236,876.00 which is equal to 40% of the estimated billable actual cost of the work $598,950.00, less the initial payment of $6,760.00 made by the City on October 25, 1996. Also, the City will pay GTE the sum of $177,657.00 which is equal to 30% of estimated billable actual cost upon 50% of work completion. Finally, the City will pay GTE the sum of $177,657.00 which is equal to 30% of estimated cost upon completion of this work order. Upon completion of the work, GTE Accounting Department will calculate all charges associated with this work order and bill or refund the City the difference between the final actual costs and the deposits received. The City received a Revised GTE Work Authorization Agreement which sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the relocation/under grounding of their facilities. The Agreement includes a general description of the work to be performed, the City's responsibilities, and GTE's responsibilities during construction. Two (2) Interagency agreements are attached for execution by the City. One copy is to be retained by the City and the other returned to GTE with the first check for $236,876.00. r:\aodrpt\97\O422\pw95-12.agr/ajp The following items of work are included in the above-mentioned agreement: Design, constructing one (1) new manhole, removing two (2) existing manholes, trenching 3,000 feet for six (6) ducts, trenching 100 feet for two (2) ducts, potholing for existing substructures, placing thirty (30) cables ranging in sizes from 4,200 pair to 600 pair with one fiber optic cable, splicing of 27,500 non-working cable pairs, transferring 18,900 working lines, and removal of 11,981 feet of existing cable. The Agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded primarily by the General Fund and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. Funds are available in Account No. 210-165-601-5804 for the required $592,190.00. Attachments: Revised GTE California Agreement r:\agdrpt\97\0422\pw95-12.agr/ajp 03-2~-97 04:ilPM ?02 Marc, h27,1997 GTE Telephone Operations 150 5. Jualuta Street He.m~ CA 92543 CAEISNC Mr. Joe Kieatk City of Ternocula P.O. Box 9033 Temeeula, CA 92589-9033 R.E: Your request dated 09/10/96 GTE Work Order Number 0$73-gP001CB G'D~ C~lifomia (hcminaR~r ~[1~ "ORE") luta complcttd the cngin~nng study you tcqu~:~d to dc~rminc the co~t for relocafing/undcrgrounding our facilities at Rancho California Road ,e, 15 Freeway. Our ~mdy indicat~ that th~ ¢rdmated billable actual co~t for the n~qu~ted work i~ $598,950.00. GTE is prtpatcd to proceed with the requ~text work under 1~ tollowing t~rms and coalitions that ~hall apply. 1. Customers shall pay in n:lvn~ee to GTE the sum of $236,876.00 wh/ch is equal to 40% of,he cstimale, d biLlable at~tual co~t of the work $598,950.00, less the initial payment $6,760.00 that was paid on October 25, 1996. Customer ~hall pay to GTE the sum of $177,657.00 which is equal to 30% of estimated cost upon 50*/. of work completion. The customer shall pay to OTE the aura of $177,657.00 which is equal to 30% of eslamatod cost upon completion of this work ordsr. Upon completion of the work order, GT£ Accounting Department will c. alculal~ all charges ass_ocia_tod with thig work order and either bill or refund t~ customer the differcame between the final am'ual costs and the deposits r~..eivod. 2. GTE will not coll~--~ tl~ sum of $191,065.00 for the I-come Tax Component (ITC) of contributions in aid of construction. InsteacL. GTE will waaw tlua f~ for the good of the public. 3. OTE will artre-apt to complete r. he work for wkich it is rcspomibl~ and to be pcrform~ uncicr this · grcement (180) days at~er receipt of the payment, ~ fully ex~uted copy of thc~ a&reeanent riocurators, and if applicable, receipt of no~fiea~tion that ar, ccpumce Customer prowd_~J underground facilities and trermi~a have been provided ~nd are ready to accept facilities to provided by GTE. Howmr, no damages or other !iabilivd shall accrue against GTE in favor of Customers if the work is not completed within tmid period due to GTE's action or the a~don of other utiliti¢g. agencies or other compaaiea involved in ~ rdoc~tian proj~.. 03-27-97 04:llPM ?03 City of Temecula 03/27/97 Page 2 4. The costs and engiz~,.ring ~:~ification.~ w/li b~ null and void if this l~cr is not signed and returned within (30) calea~iar days from letu:r date, or if Customer requ~t~ s t~w ~gi~_ -r/hA ~rudy. $. The under~ign~ participating cur~omers understand ~t ~s ~~ s~l n~ ~ b~g on GTE ~ ~du~ ~~ units, ~ until, ~1 C~rs have giv~ their ~p~l of~e~ ~ ~d ~diti~ by ~g on ~o 1~ provide. NOTE: Ba~xl upon the t~rms stat~xl above, the City ofTeaw, cula and GTEC agree that this Agreement settles the pending eminent domain lawsuit. Plea~ indicate your aoc~tane~ of thc~ ten,~ and conditiong by signing th~ ~nclo~ copy of this letter wb~a-~ indic. at~d b~ow. iaitialing and dating the ~nelo~ur~ and ~tumin8 t~ ~ully executed copy to mc in ~ ~lf-axMr~a~d envelops provided. Your cheek in the amount indic. at~:l in Condition Number I above mu~t b~ it~lud~xi with t~ tvtum~l sign~! copy of this I~t~r. PI~ show Work Order #0573-8P001CB on your c. hack. If you have any questions. pl~e dlr~t them to Chuck Watson ax 909/929-9401. Very truly R.A. Pathbone S~tion Manager. Acc_,~_s Des/gn & Construction ACCEPTANCE: By Data Nam~ (a.-xl Title if Company mvolv~) By Dat~ Attac.hrr~t~ (Sketch, ape~ificatiorts a~ r~quinxi) I~I'EM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~QR CITY MANAGEP~/~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Citywide Intelligent Management System - Phase II, Project No. PW95-16 Traffic PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects ~<T".. ,All Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-16, Citywide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS) - Phase II. Advance $290,590.00 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Improvements Project Fund. BACKGROUND: This federally funded project is intended to provide traffic signal coordination with access to the signal operation from central control room located in the new City Hall. Plans, Specifications and Contract documents have been completed for this project and staff is requesting authorization to solicit bids for construction of Phase II of the project. This project was prepared in two (2) phases. Phase I of this project, which has been completed, included installation of conduits from the new City Hall to the intersections of Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane. Phase II of this project includes installation of interconnect cable and modification to the existing traffic signal controller cabinets along the major traffic corridors within the City (See attached map). The Plans and Specifications for this project are available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project has been funded by Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) which is federally funded programs and is administered by Caltrans. Upon completion of this project the City will be reimbursed for the total project cost up to the allocated amount of $537,800.00. r:\agdrpt\97\O422\pw95-16b.bid/ajp $OCL~TE$ 2 T£MEEULA LEGEND EXISTING TYPE 90 SIGNAL (CONVERT TO TYPE 170) EXISTING TYPE 170 SIGNAL FUTURE T'I'P[ 170 SIGNAL EXISTING HARDWIRE INTERCONNECT INSTALL llARDWIRE INTERCONNECT IllSTALL HARDWIRE INTERCONNECT IN EXISTING CONDUIT 12 PAIR ~19 CCTV CAMERA LOCATION RECOMMENDED ooo INSTALL FIBER OPTIC CABLE IN EXISTING CONDUIT ere CABLE TV & FIBER OPTIC INTERCONNECT '--'H"+INSTALL SPREAO SPECTRUM (19.,2) · ..:?;,.~.FUTURE SPREAD SPECTRUM (19.2) [111~.'."iEXISTING MASTER (RELOCATE TO MARGARITA RD.) [] MA:~TER CONTROLLER BITRAN "245 DUAL ACCESS '.'*'EXISTING PHONE DROP AT MASTER LOCATION INTERCONNECT LAYOUT I FIGURE 2 ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC"I~P~~ CITY MANAGER CiTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 All-Way "Stop" - Del Rey Road at Solana Way All-Way 'Stop" - Del Rey Road at Avenida Del Reposo PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'ALL-WAY STOP" SIGN LOCATIONS ON DEL REY ROAD AT SOLANA WAY AND ON DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA DEL REPOSO BACKGROUND: The City received a letter from the Meadowview Homeowners Association to establish "All-Way Stop" locations at nine (9) intersections in the Meadowview area including the intersections of Del Rey Road and Solana Way, and Del Rey Road and Avenida Del Reposo. On February 11, 1997 the City Council approved installation of "All-Way Stop" signs on two (2) of the nine (9) intersections and these signs are currently in place. Staff conducted an extensive study of the remaining seven (7) intersections to determine feasibility of "All-Way Stop" installation. The study included collection of volume data, speed data, accident records and sight distance evaluation. Based on this study it was determined that an "All-Way Stop" should be established at the intersections of Del Rey Road and Solana Way, and Del Rey Road and Avenida Del Reposo. This recommendation was based on sight distance restriction at these intersections which is caused by roadway alignment. Trees and bushes have been removed from other intersections in Meadowview to improve the sight distance. This item was reviewed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on March 27, 1997 and after receiving comments from Meadowview residents and some discussion, the Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing "All-Way Stop" intersections at Del Rey Road and Solana Way, and at Del Rey Road and Avenida Del Reposo. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Signs Account No. 001-164-601-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001 - 164-601-5410. 4 "Stop" signs & posts @ $150.00 = 4 Limit lines & pavement legends @ $50.00 = $600.00 $700.00 Total = $800.00 Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 97- 2. Exhibit "A" - Location Map RESOLUTION NO. 9% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_CL~A ESTABLISHING 'ALL-WAY STOP" SIGN LOCATIONS ON DEL REY ROAD AT SOLANA WAY AND ON DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA D£L REPOSO The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, following "STOP' sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula. the Del Rey Road at Solana Way Del Rey Road at Avenida Del Reposo Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTiZ. n, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of April, 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of April, 1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk LOS EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP PROPOSED ALL-WAY STOP LOCATIONS CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY FOR SPEED ZONING Jurisdiction: CITY OF TEMECULA L OCA T/ON Via Norte between Solana Way and Avenida Del Reposo Existing Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph Critical Speed (85th percentlie): 43 mph Median Speed: 38 mph Number of Accidents: Accident Period: X Date of Survey: 1-7-97 Surveyed by: H.S.B. 10 mph Pace Range: 34-43 ACCIDENT RECORD REVIEW 1 (speed related only and do not include intersection accidents) 12 Months Does not warrant a speed limit more than 4 mph below the critical speed. Warrants a speed limit more than 4 mph below the critical speed. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS Warrants a speed limit less than the critical speed because of unusual conditions not readily apparent to the motorist. Unusual conditions: None. RADAR ENFORCEMENT SPEED LIMIT This Traffic and Engineering Survey indicates that the appropriate speed limit for Via Norte between Solana Way and Avenida Del Reposo is 35 MPH. CER T/F/CA T/ON I, Joseph Kicak, declare: That I am employed by the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, as City Engineer. That the attached Traffic and Engineering Survey was prepared for the City of Temecula and is a true copy of the Traffic and Engineering Survey presented to the City Clerk for their files. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Temecula, California on this day of , 19 Declarant T:lform~tra~clsurvcy~..spd 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR - CITY MANAGER "Y~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Council/City Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official-~ DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Approval for RFP for Weed Abatement Services PREPARED BY: Marianne Salazar, Code Enforcement Officer RECOMMENDATION: Abatement Services. That the City Council approve the issuance of an RFP for Weed DISCUSSION: The Code Enforcement Division of the Building and Safety Department has performed annual weed abatement activities on vacant parcels within the city for approximately three (3) years. This activity involves the inspection, posting, recording and notification to property owners of parcels, totaling approximately 1200 parcels annually. The program generally lasts for approximately three (3) months. During the past several years, the Code Enforcement Division's work load has increased substantially making it difficult for staff to service complaint referrals in a timely fashion during the time this program is underway. Staff has investigated programs in other cities in which outside contractors have been utilized to perform the weed abatement work. These cities have found this method of contracting for weed abatement services to be very successful. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are budgeted annually in Account No. 001-162-999-5440, "Weed Abatement", in the amount of approximately $23,500. Cost under this proposal are anticipated to be reduced by approximately one-half. Actual impact will not be known until review of all proposals are completed. 4/17/97 cb CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Temecula, Building and Safety Department, hereinafter referred to as the City, is inviting proposals fi'om qualified firms experienced in Weed Abatement Programs. The purpose of this request is to provide the City of Temecula with an approved contractor to administer the weed abatement program under the supervision of the Code Enforcement Division. Contents of Statement of Oualifications The prospective firms shall provide the City with the following information: A description of the firm, organization structure, location of principal offices, number of personnel, and other pertinent information. 2. Related project experience and client references. The name of the principal or project manager in the firm who will have direct and continued responsibility for the project. This person will be the City Staff contact on all matters dealing with the project and will handle the day-to-day activities through to completion. The names of any outside consultants or subcontractors to be utilized, along with an experience and project resume. The firms proposed approach, including personnel qualification and type of equipment available. Selection Criteria The City plans to consider the consultant firm's experience with similar projects, the qualifications and number of staff available for the assignment, the outside consultants or subcontractors to be retained, the firm's willingness and demonstrated ability to meet deadlines, and other areas pertinent to the project. The Building Official and Code Enforcement Staff will review the qualifications submitted and may request interviews from the top firms. Based on qualifications and price proposals, the Building Official will rank the final firms. The City reserves the right to negotiate terms and scope of work with the highest ranked firm. If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the City reserves the right to renegotiate with any other finalist. The following is the City's tentative schedule for selection of the consultant firms: R:~ALAZ~WEED.WPD 4/10/97 cb 1. Deadline for filing RFP: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Page 2 May 2, 1997 2. Staff review of Proposals: May 5, 1997 3. Interview of top firms: May 8, 1997 4. Recommendation to Council for approval: May 16, 1997 Five (5) copies of the Statement of Qualifications and Proposal must be received by 5:00 p.m. on the filing deadline at: City Clerk's Office City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Please clearly mark the envelope as follows: "RFP- Building and Safety Department/Code Enforcement General Information 2. 3. 4. The proposal shall be signed by an authorized official of the consultant firm. The proposal shall be valid for a minimum of ninety (90) days. The City reserves the right to reject any and all submittals. Please provide the City with any exceptions, additions, or suggestions which will aid us in our selection process. The selected firm will be required to obtain a City of Temecula business license. The terms and scope of the contract will be arrived based on professional negotiations between the City and the prospective firm. If the City and prospective firm fail to reach a contractual agreement, the city may renegotiate with any other finalist. Please refer any questions regarding the technical content of this RFP to Marianne Salazar, Code Enforcement Officer at (909) 693-3975. RSSALAZ~WEED.WPD 4/10/97 ¢b The Firm is obligated to provide evidence of insurance liability and abide by the City's Risk Management Procedures as found in attached contract example marked Exhibit "B". REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Page 3 The Firm will maintain required professional licenses and registrations during the life of the contract with the City. 10. Bids should be submitted on forms provided herein as found on page five and six (5 & 6) of the Specifications. Bids must be transmitted in a sealed envelope indicating the name of the bidder, titling the Proposal- RFP: Weed Abatement on the outside of the envelope. Program Information SCOPE: The Program consist of identifying vacant parcels that contain hazardous vegetation and the processing of these parcels for abatement, in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and permits issued pursuant thereto. Abatement is generally accomplished in two (2) ways. The first is by voluntary abatement by the parcel owner, and second is forced abatement which is done by City contractors. The consultant will be responsible for identifying and posting vacant parcels, (consisting of installing on site a wooden stake with an abatement notice attached), and mailing the property owners the abatement notice, (via first class mail). Following the expiration of the allotted abatement period, performing follow up inspections to determine if compliance has been achieved. The Director of Building and Safety shall determine which parcels shall be abated by the Contractor. Abatement shall comply with the requirements of the Specifications, Exhibit A to this RFP.Contractor shall document all costs of abatement and prepare necessary documents and reports for the cost assessment hearings. The City performs the abatement work on approximately 172 parcels annually. All parcels abated by the city are then assessed a special assessment for the cost of the abatement work and an appropriate administrative fee. The program extends from May to December annually. Familiarity with computer software is necessary. All consultant inspection and noticing information shall be entered into the City's computer system for recording and tracking. The program specifications are listed in Exhibit A. The program will be monitored by the Code Enforcement Staff which will be available to assist with problems or questions. Implementation Program: The chosen firm will be supplied with the Code Enforcement's existing weed abatement list (approximately 1200 parcels), which includes all public and private parcels within the City limits, which have been subject to weed abatement in the past. The program shall include: A. Inspections to verify that each parcel is subject to continuing abatement efforts and is not subject to environmental considerations. B. A method of contacting property owners to advise them of R:~SALAZAR/VBRFPWEED.WPD 4/10/97 ¢b 1.abatement standards 2.what is required on their parcel 3.consequences of ignoring the notice 4.methods of appeal REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Page 4 5.a reasonable time frame for compliance C. Provisions to recognize, and notify parcel owners that may be subject to environmental regulations. The City Planning Department may monitor the program to assure that environmental regulations are followed D. Provisions to work closely with a designated official of the City Building and Safety Department for all City parcels identified as needing abatement. E. Measures to insure that all parcels are abated in the most environmentally- acceptable manner F. Measures to insure that abatement will be completed in a manner that produces minimum amounts of noise, dust, and waste G. Procedures up to, and including, forced abatement H. Identification and verification of costs of abatement I. Preparation of necessary notices and documentation for assessment lien hearings and filing and recordation of liens. J. Contractor shall not provide weed abatement services on a private contract basis with the owner of any parcels of property which the Contractor, or its employees, will inspect as part of its duties or which would be subject to the City's weed abatement program. K. A method of sampling parcel owners who were involved in the program to determine their level of satisfaction with the program. L. A discussion as to how the chosen firm will recover those charges assessed against properties which are subject to forced abatement M. A discussion of any other methods used by the contractor to generate revenue in conjunction with this program N. A discussion of how to avoid conflict of interest SUPPORT A method of interaction shall be devised to facilitate prompt communications between the Code Enforcement Division, where most complaints originate, and the chosen firm. Once the chosen firm is notified of the complaint, it must be acted upon within a specified time frame. The ideal program will include a method to promptly handle citizen complaints about parcels which may need abatement. The process shall include a method to advise the complainants of the status of their complaint at any given time, in addition to written correspondence that their complaint is being acted upon and what action is being taken. Support from Code Enforcement to the chosen firm will be in the form of.' A. Overall quality assurance R:LSALAZARM'~WEE~.WPD 4110/97 cb C. D. E. F. Fielding citizen complaints Authorizing forced abatements Assisting with enforcement, if required Consultation on legal, technical or environmental issues Locations of areas with relatively high fire spread potential The chosen firm shall provide the Code Enforcement Staff with quarterly reports containing monthly and year-to-date information which includes, but is not limited to, the following information: A. Number of parcels inspected B. Number of complaints received C. Number of parcels forcibly abated, including: 1. Parcel number 2. Parcel owner 3. Costs of forced abatement EXHIB/T "A" SPECIFICATIONS DISCINC_,- Weed abatement by discing shall be accomplished by discing with a double-throw disc at sufficient depth to place all weeds under the surface. Discing is the plowing of weeds using reasonable care so as to not disturb under/over ground utilities, destruction to fencing, trees, bushes, buildings, equipment, supplies or adjoining land, including fire due to reckless/negligent discing of land. Wherever practical and unless otherwise specified, discing is to be considered the primary method of abating weeds. Cross Discing- Where the nature of the soil is such that it is not receptive to the cutting edge of the discs, the area shall be cross disced to reduce the magnitude of any exposed combustibles. Special Discing Conditions- Where the nature of the soil is such that it is not receptive to the cutting edge of the disc being used and where the cross discing fails to meet the standards of the Hazardous Reduction Program, it shall be the responsibility of the firm to provide the proper equipment to accomplish the approved cleaning. Dust Control- During windy conditions, the firm shall postpone work until the wind subsides or watering is provided to minimize blowing dust. EQUIPMENT- The Firm selected shall furnish tractors, discs, mowers etc in all areas suitable to complete the job of discing property. The firm shall provide transportation to and from the job R:LSALAZARI~fuRFPWEED.WPD 4/10/97 ¢b sites, for his equipment and all necessary fuel, etc., at his/her own expense. Flail mowing may be necessary in areas where environmental concerns won't allow discing. Qualified Personnel/operators- All personnel involved in this program, must be a Fire Certified Inspector and a qualified, cooperative, experienced tractor operator. All tractors and other equipment will be maintained by the firm at their expense and on his own time. EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 Fire Fighting Safety Equipment- All tractors are to be equipped with an approved spark arrestor when not equipped with turbo charger and also approved 2-1/2 gallon pressurized water type fire extinguisher and shovel. Disc- Unless otherwise approved by the Hazard Reduction Program Manager, the disc used shall be hydraulically controlled. It shall be able to turn easily and maneuver in small areas. It shall be heavy duty and capable of accomplishing a thorough mixing of soil and weeds. The disc must be in good mechanical conditions. Transport Truck- The truck (transport) for hauling the tractor and disc shall be of suitable size and horsepower to easily maneuver and negotiate all terrain traveled to reach the job sites. Transports will have a tilt type for easy loading and unloading. All equipment must meet highway specifications and safety regulations. Trucks will be in good mechanical condition and will be operated and maintained at the expense of the firm and at a time before or after working hours. Flagman- If required or necessary for any reason, the firm will furnish, at no expense to the City, flagpersons for loading and unloading of equipment. The only equipment allowed will be tractors with discs, with the exception of those areas which will require different equipment as necessary. The City Fire Chief, Chief Building Official or the City Code Enforcement Officers will advise contractors/consultants where the mowing or other methods will be allowed. The use of non-authorized equipment or methods will result in non-payment by the City. STANDARD FOR CLEARING- The purpose of removal is for the reduction of fire and safety hazards and will be accomplished by turning under and mixing weeds with the soil or by mowing, hauling, trimming, and grubbing using manual labor or by any combination of methods that are approved and included in the scope of the contract. All clearing must meet the specifications of the Hazard Reduction Program and must be approved in writing by the program representative. Method of Clearing- Five (5) acres and less will be cleared completely. Where the acreage consists of more than five (5) contiguous acres, a one hundred (100) foot wide R:~SALAZAR.M~RFPWEED.WPD 4/10/97 cb strip shall be cleared at the perimeter of the property, and through the remainder of the property there shall not be any portion of land larger than two and one-half (2-1/2) acres which is not enclosed by itself within such a strip, which shall be a fire break. If the clearing is made to the letter of the herein stated standard, the payment would be based on ill'v/(50) percent of the total square footage. It may be determined that only a portion of a parcel exceeding five (5) acres needs to be cleared to adequately provide the necessary fire protection to the surrounding improvements. In these cases, payment would be based on actual square footage disced. EXHIBIT A PAGE 3 Tumbleweed Abatement- The Firm will also be used in tumbleweed abatement in all areas during the months of August through October. PART 1I ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS The awarded firm shall at all times take precautions (where necessary) to insure the protection of the public and meet OSHA and COSHA requirements. All work performed shall be done in a prompt, thorough, lawful and professional manner. Contractor shall perform work in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, ordinances, regulations, and permit conditions. Contractor shall review and be familiar with the conditions of approval of the weed abatement permit issued by the federal Fish and Wildlife Service relating to weed abatement on sensitive habitats, dated The Firm will provide photographs of the specific parcels; one taken before abatement and another after. These photographs shall give specific dates, including property identification markers. Before and after photos should be taken while standing at the same location. Larger parcels may require more than one photo. The successful firm shall not miss more than two (2) consecutive days or more than five (5) days out of a twenty (20) day period, when work has been assigned, regardless of the reasons (i.e., equipment failure, illness etc.). In case of default by the awarded firm, the City may procure the work, or services from an alternate firm. The City may deduct any excess cost from any unpaid balance due the assigned firm, or may bill for the same at the City's discretion. The prices paid by the City, in such events shall be considered the prevailing market price at the time of purchase. The work, labor and/or materials which the bidder proposed to furnish to the City must comply in all respects with the appropriate equipment and safety regulations of all Federal, R:~SALAZARMLRFPWEED.WPD 4410/97 ¢b State and local regulatory commissions whether such equipment or safety features have been specifically outlined or required in these specifications or not. Where there are locked gates to the property, the firm will be given instructions on how to enter the properly. The Firm will be responsible for any damage done not in accordance to given instructions. All discing or other services must be done during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.., Monday through Friday except City recognized holidays. EXHIBIT A PAGE 4 Operations may be suspended at any time by the Building Official until appropriate corrective measures are taken, if any, of the conditions set forth in Request for Proposal are found to exist. PART Ill PRICING AND METHOD OF INVOICING Contract Period- The contract period shall commence on the date of issuance of the award. Extension after each one-year period shall be contingent upon the successful negotiation of cost pass-through and service adjustments. Labor Standards Provision- In accordance with the provisions of the California Labor Code, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages by each craft or type or workman needed to execute the contract in the locality in which the work is to be performed, as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California shall be paid all workmen employed. The City should not be billed for travel time to the job site or down time attributed to repairs of equipment. Bid amounts will be in effect for the duration of the contract. Specific requirements for fire breaks and other abatements methods, depending on lot size and proximity to habitat areas will become part of the contractual agreement with the successful bidder. Errors or omissions in the contract document will not serve as an excuse for extra payment for inferior work if the intent is plainly understandable. The firm shall have included in the contract a sufficient sum to cover all items, either labor, equipment and materials which are implied or required to complete the project or work. The firm will not be paid for abatements completed by his own error or error of his employees. RSSALAZ~WEED.WPD 4410/97 cb The firm shall submit by the tenth (10th) day of each month, a progress report of all new violations and notices sent, how many final notices sent, how many owner abated properties, how many city abated properties and total in compliance and year to date status. Basis of Award- It is the intent of the City to award the contract to a primary firm. In the event the assigned firm does not perform as indicated in Part II, Paragraph 3, then the full effect and intent of Part II, Paragraph 4 and 5 will be enforced. EXHIBIT A PAGE 5 BID SHEET PRICING AND METHOD OF INVOICING A_tier reading the specifications described herein for weed abatement in the City of Temecula, the undersigned does hereby bid and propose to the City of Temecula as follows: Bid Sheet Weed Abatement Contact Services All assigned projects are to be completed within the assigned time after commencing. Bid prices are to include all labor, equipment, transportation and all other items necessary to complete the work specified. 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARCELS NEEDING WEED ABATEMENT $ 2. PREPARATION OF NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS $ 3. FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONS AND CONTACTS WITH PROPERTY $ 4. PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTATION FOR DIRECTORS REVIEW $ 5. PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTATION OF COSTS FOR LIEN HEARING AND PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTATION FOR RECORDATION OF LIENS AND FILING COSTS FOR ASSESSMENTS $ The City requests per square footage prices (from 1 sq.ft. To 30,001 sq. ft and up) for discing, mowing, handwork etc.. A. DISCING COST (including removal costs due to discing) · a. per parcel, sized 1 to 7,500 square feet: $ b. per parcel, sized 7,501 to 15,000 square feet: $ c. per parcel, sized 15,001 sq. ft to one acre: $ R:~SALAZARMXR--~PWEED.WPD ~10/97 cb d. per square foot over one acre $ TRACTOR MOWING (prices to include removal costs due to mowing) a. per parcel, sized 1 to 7,500 square feet $ b. per parcel, sized 7,501 to 15,000 square feet $ c. per parcel, sized 15,001 sq.i~. to one acre $ d. per square foot over one acre $ HAND WORK a. per square foot of area abated $ DEBRIS REMOVAL (including hauling, burning and/or chipping) a. per cubic yard of material $ EXCAVATOR WITH BRUSH CUTTING MACHINE (where heavy brush makes it impractical to hand-cut and haul debris) a. per square foot EXHIBIT A PAGE 6 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES (for only those parcels where forced abatement is required) a. per parcel $ MISCELLANEOUS FEES (discretionary) a. special inspection fee The CONTRACTOR shall not change the maximum amount of such fees without prior consent of the Building Official. NOTE: Flail mowing may be required in all areas where environmental concerns will not allow discing, though discing will be the preferred method. THE AMOUNT OF WORK AND THE TYPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED SHALL BE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF, AND ONLY WITH AUTHORIZATION OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL OR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. R:~SALAZARM~-'PWEED.WPD 4/10/97 cb TEMECULA CO'MMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APRIL 8, 1997 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:14 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk/District Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Ford, to approve Consent Calendar Item 1. 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997. AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Linderoans, Roberts NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. r:\minutes.csd\040897 -1 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Birdsall, to adjourn at 8:15 PM to a meeting on April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ District Secretary r:\minutes.csd\040897 -2- ITEM 2 APPRO~,~,. ~ CITY ATTORNEY 1////,(~ . DIRECTOR OF FINAI~,~: ~ CITY MANAGER ~r \.,~.., ,/~. '' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Release of Warranty Bonds for Butterfield Stage Park - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. (De Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road) Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the Board of Directors: Authorize the release of the Warranty Bond for the construction of Butterfield Stage Park - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. 2. Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the surety. BACKGROUND: On January 24, 1995, the Board of Directors entered into a Parkland/Landscape Agreement with' Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. 12626 High Bluff Drive #400 San Diego, CA 92130 for the construction of a 2.8 acre neighborhood park within Tract No. 23125-3, currently known as Butterfield Stage Park. Subsequent to the City's acceptance of the park, the Faithful Performance Bonds were exonerated by the Board of Directors on March 26, 1996, and the Labor and Materials Bonds were subsequently released on September 24, 1996. The remaining Warranty Bonds, totaling $27,300, were issued by American Casualty Company of Reading Pennsylvania and the American Insurance Company, as follows: AMCAS Warranty Bond No. 127714398-M in the amount of $13,650. AIC Warranty Bond No. 11133167129-M in the amount of $13,650. Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Warranty Bonds shall be retained for a period not less than one year after the completion and acceptance of the park. The Maintenance Superintendent has verified that all obligations by the developer for the construction of Butterfield Stage Park have been satisfied. Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Warranty Bond for this facility. r:\yasmobk~,butlerpk.war 042207 FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None. Werranty Bond. r: ~yas mobk,~bunerpk.war 0422q7 C~'Y OF ~EC~ BOND NO. 1377i439S-M-AMCAS 11133167129-M-AIC PA~LJ~NrD~SCA~ ~/~A.N~ BO~Xq-D Premium included in Perfc_,rr.~an Bond Wi{BRE~, the City of Tcmecula, State o:[ California (h~-einafter dexignattd a.s ~Ci~'~), KAUF~QkN AND BROAD OF 2/]d SAN DIEGO, INC. C~er~n2.f/~r designated as "Principal") hav~ :n~crcd Ln~o an Agr~mant wh~.r~by PrLncipal agrees to ins'mlI uld comp]ete cemain de.signate. d Parkland hnprovc.~memts, which said Agr~ment, dated JANUARY 2z, 19 9._Q_5, ~d identified u Public Park in Project Tract 23125-3 , is hereby refenv. d to and rnad~ a part heraof; and WI-{ER.F. AS, Principal is requi.r~ to warrmuty the work done under the mrms of the Agr~me. nt for a perled of one (1) year following acceptance th~r,..of by City ag'Mnst any defective work or labor done or defective materials furrdshed, in the amount of mn percent (10%) of the estimated cost of the improvements; *'AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA AND THE A/~IERICAN INSURANCE COMPAN'Y NOW, I}-IEREFORE, we the Principal ~md ** asc~P~'el')', ar~ held and 5~,-ml~' bound unto th~ City of Temecuh, California, in the p~naJ sum of $ 27, ~oo. oo , law~al money of the UnJt~ Star,s, for the payment of tach sum well and truly to be made, we bind oursalve.s, our h~i.m, succ.~ors, ~x~cutor~ and adrai~tmtor~, jointly and s:vcrzlly. Th~ condit5on of this obligation is such that the obligation shall becom~ null and void if the abov~ bound~ Principal, his or its heirs, executors, admirdstrator~, successors, or assi~ shall in all th.i'~gs stand to, abide by, well and u'uly kc...,.p, and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the kgr~menl and any a]t~mtion thereof mad~ as th~rem providad, on his or their par[, to bt kcp~ and pcrformext at tht tim: and m the mann:r th:rtin ~p~.iiSe. d, and m all rasp~..~..~ according :o his or their true intent and m~,~ing, and shall ind:mnify and save harmlz~s th: City of Tcm~cula, its offic~:~, ag~ts, and ~mploy~% a~ therein ~tipula~; oth~.r~is:, tiffs obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect. AS a part of the obligation secured hereby ~ in addition to the face amount sp~ifie. d therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, izcluc~g 'reasonable attorney's fees, /ncurred by City in successfixlly enforcing such obligation, a~ to be taxed as ¢os~s and included i.n any judgement rendered. The surety hereby st~ulates and agr~s that i'so change, extension of tLrne, a. lteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be pefforrne~ thereunder or the specLficafions accompanying the same sha.li in anyway affect its ob1~gations on this bond, and it does hereby ,~,a~ve notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addS~on to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to d:e specifications. 2 IN 'WITNESS WHZ, R~OF, t2'is in.~m~m~nt has b~n duly ¢xe. cut~d by the Prmcipa~ ~d Surety above n~, on ~CH 5 ~ 19 96 (s~) RANCE C OM? A_,~' 13,65~ ~ Attornev-in-F~ PA. KAUFMAN AND BRO.. kD-m~, By; By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson City Attorney ,~adlng, Pennsylvania For All the Commltn~nu, You Ma. ke' Ofi~ce~,/Chlcago, Illlnot8 POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Know All Men by these Presents, That AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA. a corporat,on duly organ,zeal and ex~st,ng under the laws o! the Commonwealth of Pennsytvan,a. and hay,rig ~ts prmopal ofi~ce ,n lhe Cdy of Ch,cag0 anO State of llhno,s, does hereby make, constitufeandappornt Jean L, Hillcox, Nesley R. Downey, Larry G. O'Donnell, Oerri Corwin, Pamela L. Jacobs, Individually of Los Angeles, California ~IS Irue and la~ul Attorney-m.F~Tw4h full power and authority hereby conferred to s~gn. seal and execute ,n ds behall ~nds unOe,ta~,ngs and ofher obligato~ instruments of s~mdar nafure - In Unlimited Amounts - and to b,nd AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA thereby as full), and to the ~me exlent as d such roStrumants were s~gned by the duly authorLzed off~cers of AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA anc al; :he acts o~ sz,c Attc'nex pursuant 1o the authority hereby given are hereby rat,l,ed and conhrmed. Th~s Power of Attorney ~s made and executed pursuant to and by authority Ol Ihe following By-Law du~y adopted by the Board the Company "Arlicle V!-Execullon ol Obligations and Appoinlmenl o! Attorney-in-Facl SacDon 2 Appointment of Attorney-m-fact The President or V~ce PresBdent may. from hme to brae. appoint by written cerl,f,cates attorneys. re*fact 1o act mr behalf of the Company m the execubon of pohc~es of insurance. bonds. undertakings and other obhgatory rnstrumenfs ol hke nature Such attorneys*m-fact. Subject to the limrtat~ons ~t forth in their respectJve cerhhcates Of authordy, shalt have fult pOwer to b,nd the Company by their s~Bnature and execubon o! any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto The PresCanS Or any V~ce President or the Board of D~rectors may at any hme revoke all power and authority prev,ously g~ven to any attorney-m-fact." Th~s Power o! Attorney ~s s~gned and sealed by facs~mde under and by the authority of the following ResGlut:on adopied by the Board of Dwect~s of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the ][th day of November. ]9~6 "Resolved. that the s~gnature of the President or a V~ce President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by fats[male on any pow of attorney granted pursuant to Secbon 2 of Ad~cle Vl of the By-Laws. and the signature of the Secretary or an Assfstant Secretary and seal of the Company may be affixed by tasc~mde to any cedd~cate of any such power. and any power or cerllhcate bearing such tacs~m s~gnatures and seal shall be vahd and b,ndmg on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by cerl&cate so executed and s~aled shall. w~th respect tO any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. continue to be vahd and binding or, t, he Company" In Witness Whereof, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA~as caused these presents tO be s~gned by President and ~ts corporate seal tO be hereto affixed fhts goth day Of AU~US . 19 87 t,..~:~~ AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA State of ',hno,s ) County of Cook I S$ J. E Purlell V,ce Pres,dent O. th,s 20th day of Auqust ]9~, ~fo.e me per~nan~ came J E Purtel[. to me known. who ~mgby me duly sworn. d~d 0e~se and ~y that he res~es m the Vdiage of Olenwew. State of Ilhno~s lhal he a V<e-PreS,dent Ot AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA. the corporabon Oe~r~bed m the which execute0 the a~ve instrument. that he knows true ~eai of ~d ~r~rabon. that the ~al affixed to the ~d instrument ~ such corerate seal that ~t was ~ pursuant to authority g~ven by the ~ard Of D~r~tors ot ~d ~r~rahon and that he s~gned h~s name thereto pursuant 1o hke authOrdy ac&~w~edges ~me 1o ~e the act and Oee0 ol ~d cor~rat~on ~4~ Leshe A, Smith holary Pubhc CERTIFICATE N~ CO~SS~On Expires November lg, 1990 I,G~rge R Hcbaugh, Assistant S~ret~o~AMERICAN CASUAL~ COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, do ce~i~ that the Power of Attorney hereto a~ve set Io~h i5 still in torce, and ~uther ceHi~ that Section 2 of A~icle VI of the By-~ws of the ~mpany and the ResolutiOn o~ the Boar0 of Directors, set fo~h in said Pow~:~ Attorney ~e sdll in force. I~,tesb~ony wher~f I have hereunto subscrib~ my name and affix~ the seal of the sam ~mpany this day of ~a:cn ,19 96 G~rge R. HobauOh Assi~S~e~ 8 23~42 O INV. NO. G-S9202-A ,~roeN~ THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE AMERICAN INSURANC'E COMPANY, a Corporation incorporated under the Laws of the State of New Jersey on February 20. ] 846. and redomesticated to the State of Nebraska on June 1, 1990. and having its pnnczpal office in the City of Omaha. S~te cf Nebraska, has made. constituted and appointed. and does by the.~ prc:sents make. constitute and appoint .... PAMELA L. JACOBS .... its true and Lawful Attorney(i)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bond. s, uf~dertmking, recoglliza~(:~, or othex written obligations in the nature thereof be hereunto aff-med this /-¢2, ......& ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ~RIN ~od to bind the Corporation thereby as fully and to the aline extent as if such bonds were signed by the Preaident, r~tied with the corporate ~ of the Corporation and duly atte':ted by IU Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming aJl that the sm. id Attorney(s).-in-Fact may do in the premise. Tb~ power of attorney h granted pursuant to Article VlI, Sections 45 and a6 of By-Laws of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY' now it. rue fcrc~ and effect. *'ArlJc~ VH. Appointrecur and Authority of Resident SeervL~'t~, A tlor~ey3.4~-Fact ~d Agents In ~cept L~gM Proc~ ~d M=l~e Appearance. SecUou 4~. Appointment. The Ch~irm~. of the Board of Db-eciorl, the PreValent, any Vk:~*Presideut or r'r'y othel' pef~ol] author'L~ by the Bo~u'o of Dig~ctoea, th~ C~llrm~ of the Bom'd of DL"~ctof~, the Pr~ide=t or uy ¥1ce-Pr~ldent mr'y, [tom time to time, ~ppo~ut Reztdem Atloroey~4=-F=ct to r~pre~nt ~ud I~t [or ~ o** behllf of the Corporation r'nd Ager'U in accept k~*l pro~'~ *r'd m&ke app~'~nc~ [or it~] or, beh*lf of the Corporatin=. Section 46. Aarhorl~ The authority of such Resident A.ssLvtant Secretaries, Attorneys-ln-Fac~ and A~ents shall be as pre:w. ribed in the instrument evidencing their appointment. Any such appointment and all authority granted thereby may be rzvoked r'! any time by the Board of DLrector~ or by any per,on empowered to mLke such appointment." This power of attorney. is siTTed and sealed under ~d by the authority of the foUow~ng Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of' THE A.MERICAJ~' INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 31st clay of July, 1984, and said Re$oluuo= ha.~ not bee~ a. rn~nded or repealed: "RE. SOLVED, tha~ the signature of any Vice-Pyeqdent, A_~istant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary. of this Corporario=, and the se. aJ of th.i~ Corporation may be aff-~ed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revoc~ttion of any pow¢~ of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facaimile, and any power of attorney, a~y revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such fa~Lmil¢ signature or facsimile sea! sha~] be valid a. nd binding upon the Corporation:' IN WITNE. SS WH£REOF, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY h~ cau~d these preaent$ to be signed by its Vice-Pyesicien:, and its corporate seal to !st dayof June , 19 90 THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY R. D. Farnsworth Chathis 1~ dayof .'~)v~ , 19 90 , before me persona[ly came to me know'r,, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is V~ce-President of THE AMERICAN INSUP. ANCE COMPANY, the Corporat,ot~ dec, cnbed in and whsch executed the above instrument; that he knows the sea] of said Corporation; that the ~ af£~xed to the sa~d instrument is such coq:,orate ~al; that it was so aff-~xed by order of the Board of Ehrector$ of said Corporation and that he signed Ms name thereto by like order. IN WITNqz.~SS WH£F. EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and z ffLxed my officiE se~, the day and ye&~ here;n firs: above wintrey.. ~ leLi I I ill H M4 le,Frlll l II PI, NII mell m !~(lllt rl ! i i ffl ~ l VANDEVORT S NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF MARIN I, the undersigned, Re~iden! A_%si~tan! Secretary of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a NEBRASKA Corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remaan~ in full force and has not been revoked; and further-more that Arhcle VII, S~'c'tion.s 4~ and ~6 of the By-Laws of the Corporation, and the Re:solution of t~e Board of Directors; s~ forth in the Power of Attome)', are now i~ force. Stgned ~nd sero. led at the County of Marin. Dated the 5 t h day of /. . 360711-TA-6-90 (REV) ,~LIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES ~LARCH 5, 1996 On before me, RUTH L. YATES, NOTARY PUBLIC PA-V~LA L. JACOBS personally appeared personally known to me - OR - rL proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~) whose name{~) is/a~:subscdbed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that IAg~hez~A~ executed the same in:bi~Jher/t~jr authorized capacity(i~:~, and that by RtFv'her/tl%~r signature(~) on the instrument the person~), or the entity upon behalf of which the person{~) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying o¢1 iDe o~"urnent and could prevent fraudulent removal ar~f,r. sattachment of th~s form to another Oocurnent. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: I Signer's Name: Individual ~ Individual Corporate Officer [i Corporate Officer T, tle(s): Title(s): Partner -- ~- Limited ~ General ~ Partner -- ~ Limited Q General Attorney-in-Fact Q Attorney-in-Fact Trustee [] Trustee Guardian or Conservator ~.,a-:~.~=;-~ ~ Guardian or Conservator '~- '."~ Other: ~op of thumb here [] Other: ~op of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: ............ ~-~S ~.-.~TY COMPANY /,~LIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES .~tAR'CH 5, 1996 On before me, RUTH L. YATES, NOTARY PUBLIC Na~r,e PAMELA L. JACOBS personally appeared personally known to me - OR - ~ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~) whose nameJ~) is,'~l~:subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that J;te2sh~ executed the same in~jCerP~r authorized capacity(j~, and that by Ri~/her/ttA~r signature(~ on the instrument the person~), or the entity upon behalf of which the person~,) actea, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons reh/fng on ~e doct~rnent and could prevent fraudulent removal an~.z. eartachment of th~s form to anobber document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ~: Individual ~ Corporate Officer Title(s): ~ Partner -- ~ Limited F] General ~ Attorney-in-Fact ~ Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator '~'. '-~ [] Other: Top of thumb here [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): [] Partner-- D Limited ~ General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee ~ Guardian or Conservator '~'., '~~ [] Other: ~op of Ihurnb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: State of California COUnty of San Diego On March 8, 1996 before me, Kathryn L. Sisko, Notary Pub'ic DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER - E G . 'JANE DOE ~4~%T^~'" PUBLIC' personally appeared Martin Lighterink and Llsa Gordon .~-% /' NAMEIlS) O~: SIGNER~S) ,~emo~lly k~ow~ to me - OR - ~ proved t~ me on the basis of 5~tigf~cto~ evidence to b~-~e person(s)whose namers) subscribed to the withi~ i~strume~t and knowledged to me that he/she/they executed ~ ~";"'~'~ KATHRYN L. SlSKO ~ NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA ; t~~ COMMISSION # 1011956 ~ \%~/j ~N DIEGO COUhrTY '-' ! .......................... the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL -hm~uh ~'-o data h~low ~s nol required Oy law, il may prove valuable to persons reiyqn9 on the documenl a~d could prevenl IrauOuient reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER : INDIVIDUAL ' CORPORATE OF~:ICER TITLEIS) ~,~ PARTNER(S} I.'~ LIMITED ~ GENERAL ~ A%TORNEY-IN-FACT ~ TRUSTEE(S} ~ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR l__~ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF ArEACHED DOCUMENT City of Ter:ecula Parkland/ Landscane Warranty Bond No. I 37714305-~ 'l 1133~671 TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMEN? SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: ~J~,k~E Or rFnso~-.qS~ On SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinroe! Ave.. PO. Box 7184 . CanogB P~rk. CA g130'B-7184 ITEM 3 APPROV~j~//~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager April 22, 1997 Amendment No. 1 to Winchester Agreement Creek Park Acquisition PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Winchester Creek Park Acquisition Agreement. 2. Authorize staff to deposit $27,000 into the escrow to cover the property taxes as provided in the Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement. BACKGROUND: On February 27, 1996, the Board of Directors entered into an Acquisition Agreement with Winchester Hills I LLC for four and one-half (4.5) acres of parkland. The property is located on Margarita Road north of Winchester Road and adjacent to the Winchester Creek housing development. The seller agreed to dedicate the property to the City and the City agreed to grant $225,000 in development impact fees (DIF) to the seller upon development of the rest of the seller's project area. The Board of Directors also awarded a design services contract at the time the acquisition agreement was approved. The park Master Plan was approved by the Board on October 22, 1996. Construction documents are nearing completion and staff anticipates being ready to go out to construction bid by the end of June, 1997. The seller has requested an extension on the closing date of escrow to allow time to resolve some tax issues with the County of Riverside. The proposed amendment sets the escrow close date at May 1, 1997. The amendment also contains a provision for the City to deposit the amount of the taxes due into the escrow for payment to the County Tax Collector at the close of escrow in the event that the seller has not resolved the outstanding issues. Any amount paid by the City to cure the seller's taxes on the property will be deducted from any DIF credits due to the seller. The seller reserves the right to reimburse the City for those costs, rather than accept a reduction in credits, at seller's discretion. Approval of this item will allow staff to complete the necessary steps to close escrow and take title to the park property. Staff will then be able to go to bid for the improvements once the construction documents are completed. r: \c\agcncl~\wincr~k. amd FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment has no fiscal impact. The City has granted $225,000 in credits to the developer toward future DIF obligations at the time of developing the rest of his project. If the funds deposited by the City are used to pay the current taxes, the developer will either reimburse the City for those monies or receive a corresponding reduction in DIF credits. Attachment: Amendment No. 1 to Acquisition Agreement r: \c\agendas\wincreek.amd REAl., PROPERTY BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF 'I'EM~CGLA AN'I) WENCHESTER HII,LS I LLC ¥OR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT EAST OF 5LM~GARITA RO.a~D AND NORTH OF RUSTIC GLEN DRIVE EN THE CITY OF TEMECULA (WINCHESTER CREEK PARK) THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is entered into and effective as of Z]/or-,)' nc~ . 1997 by and between City of Temecula, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of California ("City"), and Winchester Hills I LLC. a California limited liability company ("Seller"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: This First Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which the parties hereto agree are true and correct: On February 27, 1996, the parties entered into that certain agreement entitled "AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPER'l%' BY ANT) BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND WINCHESTER HILLS I LLC FOR CERTAIN REA. L PROPERTY LOCATED AT EAST OF MARG.,MRITA ROAD ANT) NORTH OF RUSTIC GLEN DRIVE IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA (5,~,rlNCHESTER CREEK PARK)" (" Agreement"); Since entering into the Agreement. Seller has been attempting to resolve an appeal with the County of Riverside concerning the assessment and the amount of property taxes due for the parcel of which the Property is a part: It is the desire of the parties through this First Amendment to provide a method whereby the City may acquire the Property for Winchester Park while this appeal is pending. Paragraph 2. f. shall be added to the Agreement to read as follows: "f. Seller has f'ried an appeal of the assessments on the Property and the property taxes due with the County of Riverside ("Appeal") and is negotiating with the County for the resolution of this Appeal. I:, the event Seller has not resolved the Appeal as to the Property by April 24, '397. the City shall place..., into Escrow the amount of the property tax in dispute. q"6r the Property, plus penalties, interest and other charges necessary for the County to eliminate the tax lien on the Property (the "Property Tax Payment") and escrow shall pay such amount to the County concurrently with the close of escrow. An amount equivalent to the amount of the Property Tax Payment paid to the County by escrow shall be deducted from the Seller's available credits described in subparagraph 9 d. of this Agreement·" · ,. (,-~ /o,., ,n?c, A,2 ,.t' ' - ? 7 -. 7 ' Paragraph 7. b. of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: "b. The close of escrow ("Closing Date") shah be May 1, 1997, unless the parties agree otherwise through a written amendment to the escrow instructions." to read as follows: The first sentence of Paragraph 7. f. of the Agreement shall be amended "f. Real property taxes through the current fiscal year as of the Closing Date shall be prorated as of the Close of Escrow, based upon the latest tax bill available .... The addresses of the City and its counsel described in Paragraph 14 shall be amended to read as follows: "CITY: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager "With a copy to: Peter M. Thorson, Esq. Richards, Watson & Gershon 333 South Hope St.. 38th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017" Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. ///I/ //I// IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Patricia H. Birdsall Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M.Thorson City Attorney WINCHESTER HILLS I LLC, A California Limited Liability Company By: Name: Title: . APPROV~i~7, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII~IA/~,~E CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FY 1997-98 PREPARED BY: ~ .~,l,U~eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSDare coterminous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD will no longer be charged by the TCSD as rates and charges, but instead will be replaced by the City of Temecula's special tax approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. The four current service levels of the TCSD include: 1. Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting. 2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. 3. Service Level D - Recycling, Refuse Collection and Street Sweeping. R:'~yasinobk \9798 reso.csd 042297 4. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a resolution accepting the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the aforementioned services; noticing each affected property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed rates and charges for FY 1997-98 and schedule a public hearing concerning these issues for May 13, 1997. Staff will then proceed with noticing each affected property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges and the May 13th public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD FY 1997-98 Rates and Charges will fund residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection; and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The proposed TCSD levy budget for FY 1997-98 is $2,767,056. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Intention for FY 1997-98 TCSD Rates and Charges. Preliminary Levy Report for FY 1997-98. R: \yasinobk\9798 reso. csd 042297 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DHIECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons. and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. Section 3. The TCSD proposes to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance. service and administration of street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road improvements for the 1997-98 fiscal year. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, bv the same persons and together with and not separately from. the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy,, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall be applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or ira lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD has caused a written ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the report is on file in the office of the District Secretary, and is available for public inspection. R:'xya.smobk\9798 reso. csd 042297 Section 5. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and appoints the 13th day of May, 1997, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590, as the time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from time to time. Section 6. The District Secretary, is 'hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the Report and of the time and place of the hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 61765.2. Section 7. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 22nd day of April 1997. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, Secretary [SEAL] R:\yasin°bkX'9798res°'csd 0422Q? STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 97- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at ta regular meeting thereot} held on the 22nd day of April, 1997, by the following vote of the Board of Directors AYES NOES .ABSENT: DIRECTORS: DIRECTORS: DIRECTORS: R:\yasmobk\9798reso.csd 042297 EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On July 1, 1996, Muni Financial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seQ., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel withina specific service level. A Service Level isa defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed of four (4) service levels. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: .. Service Level B- Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. Service Level C- Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operations and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. Service Level R - Street and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads. R: \yasinobkX, 9795re$o.csd 042297 The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including with their totals for Fiscal Year 1997-98 to be as follows: SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET $/SFR Service Level B $ 267,688.00 $ 25.68 Service Level C 528,896.00 Variable Service Level D 1,954,337.00 162.78 Service Level R 16, 135.00 Variable TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 97-98: $2,767,056.00 The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1997-98 are as shown on the Levy Roll on file with the City Clerk. R: \y~inobk',,9798reso. c~l 042297 ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD), FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 CITY OF TEMECULA FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Preliminary Report SUBMITTED' April 14, 1997 APPROVED: MuniFinancial Corporate Office 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 San Francisco Bay Area Office One Donna Maria Way Orinda, CA 94563 Tel: (510) 376-1162 Fax: (510) 376-1162 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................1 A. Introduction .................................................................................................1 B. Description of the District and Services ...................................................2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................2 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT .........................................................................4 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ...............................................................................7 A. Modifications of the District Structure ......................................................7 B. Inclusions ....................................................................................................8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................................................................9 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...........................................................................12 APPENDIX A -- 1997-98 COLLECTION ROLL .......................................................... 14 !. OVERVIEW A. Introduction The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City. The District collects property related fees and charges (Charges) in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the Charges are set and established pursuant to Community Services District Law 61000, Section 61621, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code (the Code). The Annual Levy Report describes the District, any new inclusions, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The Charges are based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements that service properties within the District. The improvements and services within the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services necessary to maintain and operate the improvements. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. A Public Hearing is held each year before the District Board of Directors (Board), to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Final Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Description of the District and Services The District provides certain property related services and the maintenance of specific improvements within public right-of-ways and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of four (4) separate Service Levels, providing specific services and improvements to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services and improvements applicable to the property. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the various services and improvements provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level, share in the cost of the services. The costs associated with the services, are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the services are provided. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Residential Street Lighting · Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refuse · Road Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided through the District include: residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a recycling and refuse collection program; and road improvement construction and maintenance. C. Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the community. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy.Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment. 2 0 o 00o0 0 oo 0 o000 o o ~q o oo 0 0000 0 · - o ~._~ I!. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting Nincludes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels within specific residential tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. Table II shows a listing of the tracts within Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting.) TABLE II Service Level B Tracts 11087-01 20079-02 20882-00 21674-02 22915-01 24131-03 11087-02 20079-03 20882-01 21674-03 22915-02 24132-00 12189-01 20130-00 20882-02 21675-00 22915-03 24132-01 12189-02 20130-01 20882-03 21675-01 22916-00 24133-00 12189-03 20130-02 20987-00 21675-02 22916-01 24133-01 12189-04 20130-03 21067-00 21675-03 22916-02 24133-02 12189-05 20130-04 21082-00 21675-04 22916-03 24133-03 12189-06 20130-05 21082-01 21675-05 22962-00 24133-04 12189-07 20130-06 21082-02 21675-06 23100-01 24133-05 13060-01 20153-00 21082-03 21760-00 23100-02 24134-00 13060-02 20154-00 21082-04 21765-00 23100-03 24134-01 13060-03 20319-00 21340-00 22148-00 23100-04 24134-02 13060-04 20643-00 21340-01 22203-00 23101-02 24134-03 13060-05 20644-00 21340-02 22204-00 23125-00 24135-00 13060-06 20703-01 21340-03 22208-00 23125-01 24135-01 13080-07 20703-02 21340-04 22593-00 23125-02 24135-02 13080-08 20703-03 21340-05 22593-01 23126-00 24135-03 18518-00 20735-01 21340-06 22593-02 23128-00 25004-01 18518-01 20735-02 21340-07 22715-00 23177-00 27827-00 18518-02 20735-03 21561-00 22715-01 23267-00 27827-01 18518-03 20735-04 21672-01 22715-02 23267-01 27827-02 18583-00 20735-05 21672-02 22716-00 23267-02 27827-03 19872-00 20735-06 21672-03 22716-01 23267-03 19872-01 20735-07 21672-04 22716-02 23267-04 19872-02 20735-08 21673-00 22716-03 23371-01 19939-00 20735-09 21673-01 22716-04 23371-02 19939-01 20848-00 21673-02 22761-00 23483-00 19939-02 20879-00 21673-03 22762-00 24131-00 20079-00 20879-01 21674-00 22786-00 24131-01 20079-01 20881-00 21674-01 22915-00 24131-02 4 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes --includes servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rate levels have been established within Service Level C. Table III shows a listing of the tracts in each of the four (4) rate levels within Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE III Service Level C Tracts Rate Level C-1 Rate Level C-2 Rate Level C-3 Rate Level C-4 Tract Name Tract # Tract Name Tract # Tract Name Tract # Tract Name Tract # PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00 MORRISON HOMES 22148-00 ~LART~NIQU6 23128-00 BARCLEY FSTATF_5 25004-01 23267-01 R~DGEVlEW 20735-07 SADDLE'V~*~:~D 18518-00 MF_~DOWWE,'V 21765-00 23267-02 20735-08 18518-01 S~GNET SERIES 20882-00 23267-03 20735-09 18518-02 20882-01 23267-04 20881-00 18518-03 20882-02 26861-00 21764-00 V]NTAGE HILLS 22715-00 20282-03 26861-01 ~I NCHESTE~ CR 6E.K 20130-00 22715-01 TRADEV~ N~S 23125-00 26861-02 20130-01 22715-02 23125-01 26861-03 20130-02 22716-00 23125-02 ~'~Ar~CH© ~-'[GH LANDS 20643-00 20130-03 22716-01 23125-03 20644-00 20130-04 22716-02 WLLAGE GHOVE 21572-01 21760-00 20130-05 22716-03 21672-02 22203-00 20130-06 22716-04 21872-03 22204-00 21340-00 22915-00 21672-04 22761-00 21340-01 22915-01 21673-00 22762-00 21340-02 22915-02 21673-01 P~c~o SCLANA 22593-00 21340-03 22915-03 21673-02 22593-01 21340-04 22916-00 21673-03 22593-02 21340-05 22916-01 21574-00 THF_ ~N_P-~ARD$ 20879-00 21340-06 22916-02 21674-01 20879-01 21340-07 22916-03 21674-02 VVOO[~)~RE~ COUNTRY 21561-00 21674-03 22208-00 21675-00 21675-01 21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06 5 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping --provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. Service Level R, Roads --provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 ---The parcels within this rate level consists of ninety-three (93) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.821 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-seven (57) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 6 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1997-98, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. A. Modifications of the District Structure Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund Citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. · Community Services, Parks, and Recreation rothat provided for the maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. · Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians --that provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped median along arterial streets. Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, these two Service Levels will no longer be charged through the District. The number of parcels included in Service Level R, Roads (specifically Rate Level R-l) has been reduced from one hundred twenty parcels to ninety- three parcels for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Five of the streets previously serviced and maintained by the District (Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane) have been upgraded to paved roads. The parcels that were previously serviced by the maintenance of these streets have been removed from Service Level R. The only other modifications to the District are related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts that are being serviced are included into the appropriate Service Levels, and includes the addition of new single family residential units to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping). 7 B. Inclusions The inclusion of specific tracts and the parcels within those tracts to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), and Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), for Fiscal Year 1997-98 are described in the following. Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), include 426 parcels within Tracts: Tract Number of Tract Number of Number Parcels Number Parcels 23100-04 24 24131-00 127 23371-01 25 24131-03 90 23371-02 38 24133-05 122 Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), include 234 parcels within the following tracts: Rate level #1 -- Tracts: 22761-00 (Rancho Highlands -- 80 parcels); 26861-00 (Presley Development- 37 parcels); 26861-03 (Presley Development -- 41 parcels). · Rate level #2 -- No New Tracts. · Rate level # 3 ~ No New Tracts. · Rate level # 4 -- Tract: 23125-03 (Tradewinds -- 76 parcels). Inclusions to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping): A total of 784 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year. 8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS Table IV on the next three (3) pages show the District budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98. TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 BUDGETITEM No. 11il2 '193 194 Level R tTotal District 195 PERSONNEL SERVICES Salaries and Wages 5100 $7,226 $90.212 $43,168 $0 $140,606 Deferred Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0 PERS Rebrement 5102 0 0 0 0 0 State Unemployment 5103 0 0 0 0 0 Medicare FICA 5104 O 0 0 0 0 Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0 Unemoloyment Traimng Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0 D~sabiiity Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0 Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0 Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0 Temporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0 Part-T~me (Prolect) 5119 0 8,203 0 0 8203 Overtime Wages 5121 0 500 0 0 500 Subtotal (Personnel Services) $7,226 $98.915 $43,168 $0 5149,309 9 TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 BUDGETITEM No. 192 193 194 195 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Telephone Service (Cellular) 5208 $0 $0 $0 $0 Repair & Malnt. - Facilities 5212 0 49,500 0 0 49,500 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicies 5214 0 0 0 0 O Repair & Maint.-Office Equipment 5217 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance SuDphes 5218 0 0 0 0 0 Office Supplies 5220 0 0 0 0 0 Printing 5222 0 0 0 0 0 Legal Documents/Maps 5224 0 0 0 0 0 Dues and Memberstrips 5226 0 0 0 0 0 Pub~i~t~ons 5228 0 0 0 0 0 Postage and PacKaging 5230 0 0 0 0 0 Property Tax Adman Fees 5231 1.500 850 1,800 75 4,225 Rent - Faci[ibes 5234 0 0 0 0 0 Rent - E6u~pment 5238 0 0 0 0 0 Equmment Lease 5239 0 0 0 0 0 Utlht!es 5240 0 128.500 0 0 128.500 Sma![ tcols/E~:u~pment 5242 0 0 0 0 0 Urn forms 5243 0 0 0 0 0 S~gns 5244 0 0 O O 0 Legal Services 5246 0 0 0 0 0 Consulting Services 5248 0 5.000 0 0 5000 Other Outside Services 5250 0 0 0 0 0 Advertising 5254 0 0 1,500 0 1,500 Pubhc Notices 5256 3.000 3,000 3,000 3000 12.000 Conferences 5258 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Meebngs 5260 0 0 0 0 0 Staff Tra~mng/Educ, abon 5261 0 0 O O O Mileage 5262 0 0 0 0 0 Fuel Expense-City Vehicles 5263 0 0 0 0 Councd D~scret~onary 526?' 0 0 0 0 0 Blueprints 5268 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal (5200's) $4.500 $186850 $8.300 $3.075 $200.725 10 TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 No. '192 193 194 195 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Recreabon Supplies 5301 Waste Hauling 5315 0 0 2022,771 0 2.022.771 Street L~ghtJng 5319 291,800 O 0 0 291 800 Insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 5335 0 0 0 0 0 Informabort Systems 5340 4,470 16.765 6,706 0 27.94l Support Services 5345 0 0 0 0 0 Facilities 5350 0 0 0 0 0 Assessment Engineenng 5370 0 0 0 0 0 Refund of Prior Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0 City Adman Char~es 5380 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotals (5300's) $296.270 $16,765 $2,029 477 $0 $2.342,512 Operating Expenses 5400 0 0 0 0 0 Emerger~cey Road Maintenance 5402 0 0 0 16,135 16.135 Lan6scape Maintenance 5415 0 268720 0 0 268.720 Landscape Rehabilitation 5416 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotals (5400's) $0 $268,720 $0 $16135 $~84.855 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS $307,996 $571,250 $2078945 $19210 $2977401 EXPENDITURES RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS 307,996 571,250 2.078,945 19.210 2977,401 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $307,996 $571.250 $2.078,945 $19.210 $2,977.401 REVENUES OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 21.363 17.000 56,174 3,075 97,612 FUND BALANCE 18,945 25,354 68434 0 112.733 BALANCE TO LEVY 287.688 528.896 1.954.337 16,135 2.767,056 TOTAL REVENUES $307,996 $571.250 $2,078.945 $19.210 $2,977,401 11 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property. The following is the formula used to calculate each properry's District charges by the per parcel method. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse): Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge 12 Table V reflects the levy calculations for each Service Level. TABLE V PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Property Type Single Family Residential Single Family Vacant Parcel } Charge per I Parcel Unit X Parcel = Charge 1.00 $25.68 525.68 1.00 $25.68 $25E8 I Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Property Type Singte Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Family Residential Rate C-4 Parcel I Charge per I Parcel Unit X Parcel = Charge 1,00 $46.00 $46.00 1.00 89.00 89.00 1.00 116,00 116.00 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Property Type S~ngle Family Residential Parcel i Charge per Unit X Parcel I 1.00 I $162.78 Parcel Charge $162.78 Multiplier Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Property Type Single Family Residential Rate R-1 Single Famity Vacant Rate R-1 Single Family Residential Rate Ro2 Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 Parcel I Charge per I Parcel Unit X Unit = Charge 1.00 $157.08 $157.08 0.50 157.08 78.54 1.00 121.92 121.92 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel 13 Appendix A- 1997-98 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. 14 APPROV,~,, ~-~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~OR_ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~ Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary Construction of the Parkview Fire Station began on January 3, 1996. The exterior and interior improvements are complete. Public Works is working on the design for a pressure station for the domestic and fire water lines. This project is scheduled to be completed in early May, 1997. A dedication ceremony is planned for May 13, 1997. A contract was awarded to Skytec, Inc., for the construction of the City of Temecula Maintenance Yard facility. Construction began on September 3, 1996. The interior of the building is complete. The exterior of the building is in the final stage of completion. The project is scheduled to be completed at the end of April, 1997. A ribbon cutting ceremony is planned for May 13, 1997. Margarita Community Park is in the third plan check. Staff has reviewed the plans and specs for the roller hockey arena, and based on the anticipated use of the facility, staff has made some recommendations for the design of a more durable facility. Additionally, staff has recommended that athletic field lighting be included in the Phase I of the project. The Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian walkways, a roller hockey rink, tennis courts, and ballfield lighting. It is anticipated this project will go out to bid in May, 1997. The 6th Street Parking and Restroom Project is currently under construction. The exterior masonry of the restroom, the block wall along Front Street, and concrete curbs are complete. The boardwalk is nearly complete. The contractor is currently completing the plumbing, roofing and exterior finish. The contractor will be installing the driveways, curbing and pavement, and landscape improvements. This project will be the first built as part of the Old Town Streetscape Project. Amenities include a restroom facility, public lockers and eighty (80) parking stalls. Additionally, the Temecula Stage Stop transportation center will be located on this site. It is anticipated this project will be completed in May, 1997. R:~a.~AGENDAS/DEPT41 April $, 1997 A contract has been awarded to Inland Acoustics for the acoustic panels at the Community Recreation Center gymnasium. This project consists of installing acoustic panels on the walls and the ceilings of the gymnasium at the Community Recreation Center. Installation of the ceiling panels will occur April 1 thru April 14, 1997. The wall panels will be installed the week of May 12 thru May 16, 1997. This project will be complete by the end of May, 1997. The ADA upgrades project is in the first phase of plan check. Plans and specifications are currently being reviewed by staff. This project provides handicap accessibility to the following park sites: John McGee Park, Calle Aragon Park, Bahia Vista Park, Rancho California Sports Park and Veteran's Park. It is anticipated this project will go out to bid in June, 1997. R:\A~a~'GENDAS\DEPT41 April 8, 1997 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD APRIL B, 1997 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:15 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk/Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR. It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1 as follows: 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone abstaining. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Consideration of Sponsorship Requests Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Linderoans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall, to sponsor the Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo in the amount of $10,000 and the Great Temecula Tractor Race in the amount of $10,000, both of which are to be held in 1997. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes.rda\040897 -1- ITEM 2 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS Agency Member Birdsall reported the PRAC Rodeo will be held Memorial Day weekend. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall, to adjourn at 8:19 PM to a meeting on April 22, 1997, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary Minutes.rda\040897 -2- · CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Redevelopment Agency FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Amendment to Ground Lease With Dual Development Inc. and Front Street) ( Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the Redevelopment Agency: (Sixth Approve the Second Amendment to Ground Lease by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development Inc. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to record the amendment. BACKGROUND: On March 13, 1996, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula entered into a thirty (30) year ground lease agreement with Dual Development, Inc. to allow for the construction of a public transportation and retail facility on City-owned property at the corner of Sixth and Front Street. Pursuant to staff's recommendation, the Redevelopment Agency approved the First Amendment to the lease agreement on August 27, 1996, in order to accommodate additional design considerations and extend the commencement date of the lease agreement from July 1, 1996 to November 1, 1996. However, the anticipated construction of the project was further delayed due to the excavation of an old water meter and service lateral, inclement weather, and unforseen grading issues. As a result, Dual Development was unable to begin construction of the project until the middle of April, 1997. Therefore, it is recommended that a new commencement date of April 15, 1997, be established for the term of the lease. All other terms of the lease agreement will remain the same. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. Second Amendment to the Lease Agreement. First Amendment and Original Lease Agreement. R: \yazinobk\shnlamd .#2 042297 RECORDED AT REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 SECOND AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOP1VIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC., dba TEMECULA SHUTTLE THIS SECOND AMENDM!Z. NT TO GROUND LEASE is made and entered into as of April 22, 1997 by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic, as Lessor (hereafter "Agency"), and Dual Development, Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle, a California corporation, as tenant (hereafter "Tenant"). The parties agree as follows: 1. This Second Amendment to Ground Lease is made with respect to the following facts, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the parties: a. On March 13, 1996, the parties entered into that certain Lease entitled "Ground l_~.ase by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development, Inc., Temecula Shuttle." (the "Lease"); b. On August 27, 1996, the parties entered into that First Amendment to the ground lease which extended the commencement date of the lease agreement from July 1, 1996 to November 1, 1996. c. The property which is leased to the Tenant pursuant to the Lease is generally described as approximately 16,000 square feet at the comer of Sixth Street and Front Street and is legally described and depicted on Exhibit A., attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full; and d. The parties desire to establish a new commencement date for the term of the Lease in order to accommodate the work preparatory to commencement of construction. R:\yasinobk\doollea.se2 ~- April 22, 1997 2. Section 2. A. of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. "A. Initial Term. Unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in this Lease, the term of this Lease shall be thirty (30) years commencing on April 15, 1997 and ending April 14, 2027. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, whenever reference is made in this Lease to the term of this Lease, such reference shah include any extension of the term of this Lease. follows: Sections 4.B. and 4.C. of the Lease are hereby amended to read as "B. On the first five year anniversary of this Lease April 15, 2002, and on each subsequent five year anniversary during the initial term and extended term, if any, of this Lease, the Base Rent described at subsection "A" above shall be increased by an amount which is 8 % greater than the Base Rent (including previous rent adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year period. "C. On the first twentieth year anniversary of this Lease April 15, 2017, Agency shall cause the property to be reappraised at its then existing fair market value, and the Minimum Annual Rental shall be adjusted to ten percent (10%) of the appraised fair market value. Thereafter, on each subsequent five year anniversary of this Lease, including extensions, if any, the Minimum Annual Rental shall be increased by an amount which is ten percent (10%) greater than the Base Rent (including previous rental adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year period. 4. Except as specifically amended by this Second Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Lease shah remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to Lease to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above. R:\¥asinobk\doollea.se2 2 April 22. 1997 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA By Patricia H. Birdsall Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC. By Kathleen Dool, President By Edward Dool, Vice President R:\,/asinobk\doollea.se2 3 April 22, 1997 Recording Requested By City of Temecula When recorded mail to: City of Temecula Office of the City Clerk 43174 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9035 Temecula, Ca. 92589 387921 RECEIVED FOR RE("' ~D AT 8:00 O'CLOCK OCT - 9 1996 Flec~d~r F~s$ ~'] "~ GROUND LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC. 387921- 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. E1VI"RY BY AGENCY ................................. 17 DISCRIMINATION ................................... 18 ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING ........................ 18 ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES ............................. 18 INSOLVENCY OR BANKRUPTCY ........................ 18 DEFAULT OR BREACH ............................... 19 PARTIES BOUND AND BENEFITED ....................... 19 NO PARTNERSHIP OR JOINT VENTURE .................... 19 TIME ........................................... 20 CONDEMNATION ................................... 20 TENANT'S DUTY TO REMOVE .......................... 20 ATrORNEYS' FEES .................................. 20 NOTICES AND PAYMENTS ............................ 21 SECTION HEADINGS ................................. 21 INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION ...................... 21 INTERPRETATION .................................. 21 VENUE .......................................... 22 NO ARBITRATION .................................. 22 PRIORITY OF DOCUMENTS ............................ 22 R :XA~AGENDA.~D~/ALLF~.$ £ ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 2. 3. 4. 5. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. R:~A~AGElqDA~kI~JAI · I:A.Sle HOLDING OVER ..................................... 2 RENT ............................................ 2 CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITY AND RETAIL PROJECT ................................. 3 WARRANTIES ....................................... 5 SECURITY DEPOSIT .................................. 6 USE ............................................. 7 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS ............................. 7 SIGNS ............................................ 7 INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS .................. 7 LIABILITY INSURANCE ................................ 8 FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE .............. 10 PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES .......................... 12 UNDERGROUND TANKS .............................. 12 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INDEMNITY .................... 12 TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS ....................... 13 UTILITIES ........................................ 14 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS/MAINTENANCE ................. 14 GROUND LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPlV!ENT INC., TEMECULA SHUTTLE THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, (hereinafter "Lease") is made and entered into as of March 13, 1996, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter "Agency"), as Lessor, and DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC., DBA TEMECULA S~E, a California Corporation, (hereinafter "Tenant"), as Tenant. The parties agree that: 1. PROPERTY LEASED. Agency, in consideration of the rents and payments herein agreed to be paid, and of the terms, covenants and conditions agreed to herein, hereby leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases from Agency, that certain real property commonly described as a parcel of unimproved real property consisting of approximately 16,000 square feet, located at Sixth and Front Streets, in the City of Temecula, California and which is specifically depicted and legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, (the "Premises"). 2. TERM. A. Initial Term. Unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in this I2ase, the term of this Lease shall be thirty (30) years commencing on July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 2026. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, whenever reference is made in this Lease to the term of this Lease, such reference shall include any extension of the term of this Lease. B. Option to Extend. Agency hereby grants to Tenant the right and option to extend the term of this Lease for three (3) successive additional periods of five (5) years each (the "Option Periods") on the same terms and conditions as contained in this Lease including, without limitation, the rental adjustments set forth at Section 4 of this Lease, subject to the conditions set forth in this subparagraph. Tenant's exercise of such right and option shall be by written notice (the "Option Notice") given to Agency at least one (1) year prior to the end of the term, including each extended term, of this Lease. Subject to the provisions of the next sentence, upon the giving of the Option Notice, the term of this Lease shall be extended for the Option Period, subject to earlier termination as elsewhere in this Lease provided. Notwithstanding Tenant's prior exercise of its right and option to extend the term of this Lease (whether such exercise was, at the time, valid or invalid), Tenant shall have no right and option to extend the term of this Lease, and any exercise of such fight and option shall be void, if at the date of the commencement of the extended term, Tenant is in default under this I. ease, whether or not cured pursuant to the terms of this Lease. K :~,~GGNDAS~DUALI. E.A.S£ ' l ' 38792X 3. HOLDING OVER. Should Tenant retain possession of the Premises after the termination of this Lease or after the effective date of any termination of this Lease, such holding over shall not constitute a renewal or extension of this Lease or give Tenant any rights in or to the Premises. A. Except for the deferral period specified at Section 5(B) of this Lease, Tenant shall pay to the Agency, without abatement, deduction or offset, Minimum Annual Rent which consists of the Base Rent in the amount of Sixteen Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($16,800.00) per year and the Rent Adjustment(s) described below. The Minimum Annual Rent shall be payable, in twelve (12) equal installments of One Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($1,400.00) each month, paid on or before the first of each month, beginning on the first day following the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy by the Agency for the Improvements described in Paragraph 5. If the rental commencement date falls on a day of the month other than the first day of the month, the rent for the first fractional month shall be pro rated. The monthly rent under Section 5(B) of this Lease of Seven Hundred Dollars ($700.00) per month during the construction period and the monthly rent under this Section 4(A) of $1400.00 per month for the first six (6) months following the date of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy by the City for the Improvements ("Occupancy Date') shall accrue and payment of such 'Accrued Rent" (consisting of $700.00 per month during construction period as set forth in Section 5(B) and $1400.00 for the first six months of occupancy) shall be deferred. The Accrued Rent shall bear interest from the commencement date of the lease until paid at the same interest rate as the Agency's Small Business Loan to Tenant. The Accrued Rent shall be payable six (6) months following the Occupancy Date in thirty-six (36) equal monthly installments in an amount calculated to amortize fully the Accrued Rent, with interest. B. On the first five year anniversary of this Lease July 1, 2001, and on each subsequent five year anniversary during the initial term and extended term, if any, of this Lease, the Base Rent described at subsection "A' above shall be increased by an amount which is 8 % greater than the Base Rent (including previous rent adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year period. C. On the first twentieth year anniversary of this Lease July 1, 2016, Agency shall cause the property to be reappraised at its then existing fair market value, and the Minimum Annual Rental shall be adjusted to ten percent (10%) of the appraised fair market value. Thereafter, on each subsequent five year anniversary of this Lease, including extensions, if any, the Minimum Annual Rental shall be increased by an amount which is ten percent (10%) greater than the Base Rent (including previous rental adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year period. R AA'~AGE~ DA.~UALLEA.S £ -2 - Z~W~6 38792X D. Triple Net Lease. It is understood that this is a triple net lease and that the Agency shall receive the rent set forth in subsections A, B and C above free and clear of any and all impositions, taxes, liens, charges or expenses of any nature whatsoever in connection with the ownership and operation of the Premises. In addition to the rent reserved by subjections A, B and C, Tenant shall pay to the parties respectively entitled thereto all impositions, possessory interest taxes, insurance premiums, operating charges, maintenance charges, construction costs, and any other charges, costs and expenses which arise or may be contemplated under provisions of this Lease during the term, including any extensions, hereof; provided, however, that Agency shall pay all appraisal costs and fees incurred in connection with the lease of the Premises and those costs of architectural site planning, obtaining land use entitlements for the site plan, including a plot plan, and of the Parking Lot, on behalf of the City of Temecula as agreed between the City and Tenant in that certain Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for 41953 Main Street, Temecula and Lease or Sale of Property Located at Sixth and Front Street, Temecula (APN 922-034-029-1) dated March 16, 1995 ('Acquisition Agreement"). All such charges, costs and expenses shall constitute additional rent, and upon the failure of Tenant to pay any of such costs, charges or expenses, Agency shall have the same rights and remedies as otherwise provided in this Lease for the failure of Tenant to pay rent. It is the intention of the parties hereto that this Lease shall not be terrainable for any reason by the Tenant, and that Tenant shall in no event be entitled to any abatement of or reduction in rent payable under this Lease, except as herein expressly provided. Any present or future law to the contrary shall not alter this agreement of the parties. CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITY AND RETAIL PROJECT. A. Tenant shall construct, at its sole cost and expense, a first class public transportation and retail facility, and surrounding landscaping, on the Premises in accordance with the designs, terms and specifications attached hereto at Exhibit B or subsequenfiy submitted by the Tenant and approved by the Agency (the "Improvements'). It is understood and agreed that construction of the Improvements will proceed in two phases. Phase I of the Improvements shall consist of the transportation facility and approximately 1800 square feet of retail and office space, which shall include the office of Temecula Shuttle, a snack bar and minor retail uses, including wine tour operations. Developer anticipates that Phase II of the Improvements will include approximately 9,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and office space and shall be consistent with adjoining land uses and shall comply with all applicable zoning requirements. Phase II shall be constructed at the option of and within the time period selected by the Tenant, but if it is developed, it shall be within the Premises. B. During the construction periods set forth at Sections 5(C) and 5(D) below, the monthly rental on the premises shall be Seven Hundred Dollars ($700.00) per month which shall accrue and be payable on a deferred basis pursuant to Section 4(A) above. '3- C. Preliminary plans for the Improvements shall be submitted to Agency for review and approval on or before thirty (30) days from the date of this Lease. Preliminary plans shall show the architectural elevations for the building, materials to be used on the exterior, interior building layout, and a landscaping plan. The preliminary plans shall be approved by the Planning Director at a Director's Hearing. Final construction plans and specifications shall be consistent with the approved preliminary plans and shall be submitted within thirty (30) days from the approval of the preliminary plans. The final construction plans and specifications shall be approved by the Executive Director of the Agency. Construction shall commence within one (1) month following approval of the final plans and shall be completed within nine (9) months from the date of approval of the final plans. If Tenant shall not have fulfilled the foregoing conditions by the date specified for any reason, excluding force majeure or causes beyond the control of the Tenant other than financing, then Agency may elect to terminate this Lease. Approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. D. Tenant shall pay all costs of constructing the Improvements, including but not limited to, fees and costs charged by architects, engineers, the general contractor, subcontractors, and laborers and materialmen as well as the costs of offsite improvements, and bonds required for the construction. Agency shall have no obligation to pay any costs or fees in any way related with construction of the Improvements by Tenant under this Lease; provided, however, the Agency shall pay any costs of grading the Premises to eliminate or minimize flood plain problems and of bringing utility, water and sewer lines to the Premises. E. Tenant shall post a Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of the' contract let for the Phase I Improvements plus ten percent (10%), prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Phase I Improvements and a subsequent Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of the contract let for the Phase II Improvements plus ten percent (10%) prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Phase II Improvements. The form and content of the bond and the surety shall be approved by the Executive Director of the Agency. F. Tenant shall keep the Premises and Improvements free from all liens and encumbrances by reason of the use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant, unless approved in writing by the Agency. If any liens or encumbrances are filed thereon, Tenant shall remove the same at its own cost and expense and shall pay any judgment and penalties which may be entered thereon. Should Tenant fail, neglect or refuse to do so, Agency shall have the right to pay any amount required to release any lien or encumbrance or to defend any action brought thereon, and to pay any judgment or penalty, and Tenant shall be liable to Agency for all costs, damages, and attorneys' fees, and any amounts expended in defending any proceedings, or in the payment of any lien, encumbrance, judgment or penalty. Agency may post and maintain upon the premises notices of nonresponsibility as provided by law. Upon demand by Agency, Tenant shall post the bond contemplated by Civil Code Section 3143. 35~92X G. Ownership of Improvements During Lease Term. Title to all Improvements to be constructed on the Premises by Tenant shall be owned and may be depreciated for income tax purposes by Tenant until expiration of the term, including extensions, if any, or sooner termination of this lease; provided, however, Agency disclaims any warranty of title or any representation or warranty that depreciation may be available to Tenant. H. Ownership of Improvements at Termination. All Improvements on the Premises at the expiration of the term, including extensions, if any, or sooner termination of this Lease shall, without compensation to Tenant, automatically and without any act of Tenant or any third party become Ageney's property. Tenant shall surrender the Improvements to Agency at the expiration of the term, including extensions, if any, or sooner termination of this Lease, in good condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, other than those, if any, permitted under this Lease, or otherwise created or consented to by Agency. Tenant agrees to execute, acknowledge, and deliver to Agency any instrument requested by Agency as reasonably necessary in Agency's opinion to perfect Agency's right, tifie, and interest to the Improvements and the Premises. I. Fixtures. Tenant agrees that the following items are real property for purposes of this Lease: All permanent fixtures now or hereafter installed by Tenant on or in the Premises, or the Improvements for the generation and distribution of air, water, heat, electricity, light, fuel or refrigeration, or for ventilating or air-conditioning purposes, or for sanitary or drainage purposes, or for the exclusion of vermin, or insects, or for the removal of dust, refuse, or garbage, and including all awnings, window shades, drapery rods and brackets, screens, floor coverings, incinerators, carpeting and permanent fixtures used in the operation of the Improvements together with all additions to, substitutions for, changes in or replacements of, the whole or any or all of said items of property. Real Estate Covenant. Agency and Tenant covenant and agree that all Improvements shall at all times be, and remain, real property notwithstanding Tenant's interim ownership of the Improvements. A. Tenant acknowledges that it is sophisticated and knowledgeable with regard to evaluating and leasing real property in the area and that prior to the commencement of this Lease Tenant will have had sufficient opportunity to enter the Premises to perform such tests and investigations as Tenant deems necessary to satisfy itself as to the condition of the Premises for the uses set forth in this Lease. Tenant shall not be responsible for Hazardous Materials (as defined in Paragraph 16 of this Lease) which may be present on the Premises as of the date of this Lease. R :XA'u~GEN DA.~DLI/d.J.F~.$E '5 ' ~.'29/96 35792~ TENANT IS ACQUIRING A LEASEHOLD INTERF_ST IN THE PREMISES "AS IS' WITHOUT ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER AS TO ITS CONDITION, PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT TENANT SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (AS DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH 16 OF THIS LEASE) ON THE PREMISES WHICH MAY BE PRES~ ON THE PREMISES AS OF THE DATE OF THIS LEASE. B. Agency represents and warrants that, as of the effective date of this Lease: 1) it is the owner in fee simple of the Premises; 2) the use of the Premises as set forth in Paragraph 8 of this Lease does not violate any known restrictions applicable to the Premises; and 3) this Lease has been approved as required by law. 7. SECURITY DEPOSIT. A. Tenant shall deposit with Agency the sum of One Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($1,400.00) as security for the full performance and observance of each and every provision of this Lease, provided that the said amount shall be increased each time the rent is adjusted by a percentage equal to the percentage increase of the Rent Adjustment as set forth in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. The initial deposit shall be paid directly to Agency concurrently with the execution of this Lease, which payment shall constitute a condition precedent to the obligations of Agency hereunder, and the increase shall be paid with the monthly rent payment next following a Rent Adjustment. B. In addition to any other remedies the Agency may have pursuant to this Lease, if Tenant defaults in any particular, Agency may use, apply, or retain the whole or any part of the deposit (1) to the extent of any sum due to Agency, or (2) to make any required payment on Tenant's behalf, or (3) to compensate Agency for any expense or damage caused by Tenant's default. Tenant shall pay to Agency a sum equivalent to the amount by which the deposit was so depleted within thirty (30) days after Tenant's receipt of written notice from Agency of said depletion. C. Agency is not a trustee of the deposit and may commingle it, use it in ordinary business, transfer or assign it, or use it in any combination of those ways. No interest shall accrue on the deposit. Upon the expiration or termination of this Lease, Agency shall return the deposit to Tenant, provided that Tenant is not then in default. R :~A~AOF. NDA~D~J.~I ! 1:4,.$E -6- 35792~ A. The Premises and the Improvements shall be used only for such uses as are authorized or permitted under the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Zone as identified in the Old Town Specific Plan as it now exists or may hereafter be amended by the City Council of the City of Temecula. B. Tenant shall construct, maintain and provide four (4) bus parking spaces on the Premises and Tenant shall provide automobile parking spaces as required by the City's applicable zoning requirements. With respect to the automobile parking spaces, Tenant may elect to construct, maintain and provide for such spaces on the Premises or Tenant may elect to pay such fees as are required for providing the equivalent of such spaces on a City or Agency owned parking lot pursuant to a parking district or parking fee ordinance, in accordance with applicable zoning requirements. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, comply promptly with all applicable statutes, laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, restrictions of record, and requirements in effect during the term of this Lease, or any part, or extended term of this Lease, regulating the Premises, construction of the Improvements, the use by Tenant of the Premises, and/or the operation by Tenant of its business therein, including, without limitation, any and all requirements of City respecting facility hours of operation, sound amplification, lighting, noise, security or other matters. 10. SIGNS. Tenant shall not allow the construction or placement of any sign, signboard or other form of outdoor advertising anywhere on the Premises without the prior written consent of the Executive Director of the Agency, which consent shall not be unreasonable withheld. In the event Tenant violates this provision, Tenant hereby authorizes Agency to enter the Premises, without notice, and to remove and dispose of any such sign, signboard or other advertising and to charge the cost and expense of any such removal and disposal to Tenant, who shall pay the same on demand. 11. INDF. MNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. Tenant shall indemnify, defend (with legal counsel approved by Agency, such approval by Agency shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless Agency, City of Temecula and their respective elected and appointed officers, employees, servants and agents from and against all claims, actions, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, attorney's fees and other expense of any nature for loss or damage to property, or injury to or death of persons, arising in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, by reason of this Lease or the use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant (collectively "Claim") (whether the Claim be made during the Lease term or thereafter), except such loss, damage, injury or death caused by the sole negligence of Agency or any of its officers, employees, servants or agents. The liability of Tenant hereunder shall not be limited by the insurance provisions of Paragraph 12 of this Lease. R:~AGEN DA.~DUA! ! -~..$E '7- The indemnification, legal defense and hold harmless provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration of termination of this Lease and shall relate back to all periods of Tenant's previous ownership or possession of the Premises. 12. LIABII.ITY INSURANCE. Tenant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Lease, at its own cost and expense, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with from the use, occupancy, disuse or condition of the Premises or improvements thereon. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (t) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and/or Employer's Liability Insurance. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Tenant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Executive Director of the Agency, which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld. At the option of the Agency, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respeas the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Tenant shall provide security reasonably satisfactory to the Agency guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. D. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: R:~.AL~.GENDA~DU,~l iK**.$E -8- 357922 The Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Tenant; products and completed operations of the Tenant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Tenant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Tenant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Tenant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Tenant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Agency. E. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VH, unless otherwise acceptable to the Agency. F. Verification of Coverage. Tenant shall furnish the Agency with certificates of insurance executed by an authorized agent of the insurance company, authorized to bind the insurance company, or original endorsements, or complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies effecting coverage required by this Section. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the Agency. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the Agency before work commences. -9- 2/29/96 G. Subcontractors. Tenant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policy or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements sated herein. H. Increases in Coverage. The amount of insurance coverage described in Subsection (B) shall be increased every five (5) years on the Anniversary Date in such an amount as the Agency may reasonably determine based upon inflation, increased liability awards, recommendations of professional insurance advisors and other factors customarily used to determine appropriate levels of coverage of the insurance required by this Lease. 13. FIRE AND EXTF. NDED COVERAGE INSURANCE. Tenant, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, shall provide and maintain insurance covering the Improvements, including, without limitation, all buildings, structures, and improvements now situate or which hereafter may be erected or placed on the Premises, against loss or damage by fire, vandalism, malicious mischief, windstorm, hail, smoke, explosion, riot, civil commotion, vehicles, aircraft, flood or earthquake, including, without limitation, endorsements or increased cost of construction due to changes in laws, agreed amount or demolition. All such insurance shall be in a sum not less than 90 percent of the replacement cost (the "Replacement Cost") exclusive of foundations and below ground improvements and shall contain "Replacement Cost Endorsement." Such insurance shall be in forms and with companies satisfactory to Agency in its reasonable discretion. Tenant shall not carry any insurance the effect of which would be to reduce the protection of or payment to Tenant or Agency under any insurance that this Lease obligates Tenant to carry. If any dispute concerning compliance with the requirements of this Section cannot be resolved by agreement, Agency may, not more often than once every 12 months, request that the Replacement Cost be determined by a reputable and qualified insurance consultant selected and paid by the Agency and the resulting determination shall be conclusive between the parties for the purpose of this Section. A. Use of Proceeds. Agency shall, at Tenant's cost and expense, cooperate fully with Tenant to obtain the largest possible recovery under all policies of fire and extended coverage insurance required by this Section. Subject to the terms of any Leasehold Mortgage that may constitute a lien on the Premises, all such policies shall provide that the proceeds shall be paid as set forth in this Section. If the proceeds do not exceed the amount defined in this Lease as the measure of minor restoration, all the proceeds shall be adjusted by and paid to Tenant and shall be applied by Tenant for the restoration of any Improvements damaged or destroyed by the casualty giving rise to the insurance claim. If the proceeds exceed that measure, all the proceeds shall be adjusted jointly by Agency and Tenant, deposited with a mutually acceptable trustee (the 'Trustee") and disbursed subject to all the provisions of this Lease: (1) Tenant shall pay Trustee, on request from time to time, the amount the estimated cost of completing the restoration, as reasonably determined by Trustee, exceeds the amount of the proceeds deposited with Trustee (all funds deposited with, or received by Trustee are referred to as the *Restoration Fund"). All funds remaining in the Restoration Fund on completion of the restoration shall be paid to Tenant after paying to the Leasehold Mortgagee any sums necessary to cure any default thereunder that can be cured by the payment of money. If an event of default exists at the time the casualty occurs or at any time thereafter, then, at the sole and arbitrary option of the Agency, all or part of the Restoration Fund may be applied by Trustee (i) to the restoration and no such refund shall be due Tenant, or (ii) to cure any event of default. (2) Disbursements shall be made from time to time as reasonably requested by Tenant in an amount not exceeding 90 percent of the cost of the work completed since the last disbursement, on receipt of satisfactory evidence of the stage of completion and of performance of the work in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with the contracts, plans, and specifications. (3) At the time of any disbursement, no event of default shall exist hereunder, and no mechanics' or materialmen's liens or stop notices shall have been filed and remain undischarged. (4) Trustee may retain 10 percent of the Restoration Fund until the restoration is fully completed, the mechanics' lien claim period has expired, and there are no undischarged liens nor stop notices. (5) The parties agree that any Leasehold Mortgagee shall be an acceptable trustee. (6) Trustee may impose such other reasonable conditions as are then customarily imposed by construction lenders in the area where the Premises are located. (7) Nothing herein shall discharge, postpone, or delay the performance of any other covenant, promise, or agreement of Tenant undertaken under this Lease. The right of Agency (whether or not exercised) to apply Restoration Funds to R:XA~AGENDA.~DUAI/.F_A.$E - l 1- 2~29~ complete the restoration shall not be deemed to cure any default of Tenant or satisfy any damages of Agency hereunder. B. Agency shall not be obligated to keep the Premises insured against fire or any other insurable risk. Tenant hereby and forever waives all right to claim or recover damages from Agency in any amount as the result of any damage to the Premises by fire, earthquake, flooding, storm or any other casualty, except to the extent any such casualty is caused the Agency. 14. PF-qTICIDES AND HERBICIDES. Tenant shall use pesticides and herbicides everywhere on the Premises in strict accor~ce with all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations. Tenant shall dispose of all pesticides and herbicides, and any containers, clothing, equipment and other materials contaminated therefrom, in such a manner as prescribed by law. Tenant shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by Agency (such approval by Agency shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless Agency and its officers, employees, servants and agents from and against all claims, actions, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses of any nature resulting from Tenant's use of pesticides and herbicides anywhere on the Premises. The indemnification, legal defense and hold harmless provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease and shall relate back to all periods of Tenant's previous ownership or possession of the Premises. 15. UNDg'.RGROUND TANKS. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this I.ease, Tenant shall not install underground or above-ground fuel and/or Ha?ardous Materials (defined in Section 18) storage tanks anywhere on the Premises. 16. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS llNDEMNITY. A. Tenant shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by Agency (such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless Agency and its officers, employees, servants and agents from and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses of any nature (a) including, without limitation, all foreseeable and all unforeseeable consequential damages, directly or indirectly arising out of the presence, use, generation, storage, release or disposal of Hazardous Materials on the Premises, except for those present on the Premises as of the date of this Lease, or arising out of the presence or use of any underground tanks which may be installed and located on the Premises after the date of this Lease, and (b) including, without limitation, the cost of any required or necessary repair, cleanup, or detoxification, and the preparation of any response, remedial, closure or other required plans, to the full extent that such action is attributable, directly or indirectly, to the presence, use, generation, storage, release, or disposal of Hazardous Materials on the Premises by Tenant or Tenant's invitees after the date of this Lease. B. As used in this Section, Hazardous Materials means any substance, product, waste or other material of any nature whatsoever which is or becomes listed, regulated or addressed pursuant to (1) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et sea_. CCERCLA"); the HaTardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C., Section 1801, et ifil.; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C., Section 6901, et sea_.; the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C., Section 2601, et sea_.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251, et tggl.; the California Hazardous Waste Control Act, Health and Safety Code Section 25100, et sea_.; the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, Health and Safety Code Section 25330, et ,~t.; the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, Health and Safety Code Section 25249.5 et iF&.; California Health and Safety Code Section 25280, et ~.; (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances); the California Ha:'ardous Waste Management Act, Health and Safety Code Section 25170.1, et sea_.; California Health and Safety Code Section 25501, et sea_. (Hazardous Materials Response Plans and Inventory); or the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Water Code Section 13000, et sea_., all as amended, (2) any other federal or state law or any local law regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any hazardous, toxic or dangerous waste, substance or material, as now is, or at any time hereafter may be, in effect, and (3) any rule or regulation adopted or promulgated under or pursuant to any of said laws. C. If Tenant receives any notice, whether oral or written, of any inquiry, test, investigation, enforcement proceeding, environmental audit or the like regarding any Hazardous Material on the Premises, Tenant shall immediately notify Agency in writing of such notice. D. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease and shall relate back to all periods of Tenant's previous ownership or possession of the Premises. The provisions of this section are intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Section 9607(e), and California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to insure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify Agency from any liability pursuant to such laws. 17. TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS. A. Tenant shall pay, when due, all taxes and assessments which may be levied against Tenant's possessory interest in the Premises and upon any improvements, trade fixtures and personal property which is currently located on the Premises and/or which Tenant causes to be constructed, placed or maintained upon the Premises. Tenant shall provide to Agency within five (5) days after the date when any tax or assessment would become delinquent, receipts or other appropriate evidence establishing this payment. The parties contemplate that the Agency will create a separate parcel for the Premises. In the event this is not accomplished or the assessor's office does not create a separate tax parcel 36792~ for the Premises and separately assess the Premises and Improvements, property taxes shall be allocated in the ratio that the land area of the Premises bears to the total tax parcel, and the Improvements located on the Premises bears to the total improvements assessed. B. Tenant shall keep the Premises and Improvements free from all liens and encumbrances by reason of the use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant. If any liens or encumbrances are 'filed thereon, Tenant shall remove the same at its own cost and expense and shall pay any judgment and penalties which may be entered thereon. Should Tenant fail, neglect or refuse to do so, Agency shall have the right, but not the obligation, to pay any amount required to release any lien or encumbrance or to defend any action brought thereon, and to pay any judgment or penalty, and Tenant shall be liable to Agency for all costs, damages, and attorneys' fees, and any amounts expended in defending any proceedings, or in the payment of any lien, encumbrance, judgment or penalty. Agency may post and maintain upon the premises notices of nonresponsibility as provided by law. Upon demand by Agency, Tenant shall post the bond contemplated by Civil Code Section 3143. 18. UTILFFIES. Tenant shall pay all charges and assessments for, or in connection with, electricity, gas, water, telephone and all other utilities which may be furnished to, or used on, the Premises, except as provided in Section 5(D) above. 19. T!~NANT IMPROVEMENTS fMAINTENANCE. A. Throughout the term of this Lease Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, repair and maintain the Premises and all Improvements thereon in good order and condition and in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations and subject to the provisions of this Lease. Agency shall not be obligated to repair or maintain the Premises or Improvements in any manner at any time during the term of this Lease; provided, however, Agency may elect to perform any obligation of Tenant pursuant to this Section on Tenant's failure or refusal to do so and at Tenant's reasonable cost and expense. Said election by Agency shall not constitute a waiver of any right or remedy for Tenant's default. Tenant shall reimburse Agency for the reasonable cost and expense it incurred in the performance of Tenant's obligation within thirty (30) days of Agency's request for payment. B. The parties shall have the following responsibilities with regard to maintenance of the Premises. (1) Duty to Maintain First-Class Condition. Throughout the term, Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, and at no cost and expense to Agency, maintain the Premises in first-class condition and repair and in accordance with (a) all applicable laws, permits, licenses and other governmental authorizations, rules, ordinances, orders, decrees and regulations now or hereafter enacted, issued, or promulgated by federal, state, county, municipal, and other governmental agencies, bodies, and courts having or claiming jurisdiction and all their respective departments, bureaus, and officials ('Laws"); Co) rules, orders, regulations, and requirements now or hereafter enacted, issued, or promulgated by the insurance underwriting board or insurance inspection bureau having or claiming jurisdiction and all insurance companies insuring all or any part of the Premises (the "Insurance Requirements'). Tenant shall promptly and diligently repair, restore, alter, add to, remove, and replace, as required, the Premises and all Improvements thereon to maintain or comply as above, or to remedy all damage to or destruction of all or any part of the Improvements. Any repair, restoration, alteration, addition, removal, maintenance, replacement, and other act of compliance under this Section (hereafter collectively referred to as 'Restoration") shall be completed by Tenant whether or not funds are available from insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds or Subtenant contributions. The Restoration shall be repaired or restored at least to the building standard and quality of the Improvements in existence prior to the date of such damage or destruction. If during the last five years of the term of this Lease, a casualty occurs for which insurance is not required under this Lease and which causes damages in excess of one-half of the then fair market value of the Improvements, then Tenant may elect to terminate this Lease, notwithstanding any other term hereof. Nothing in this provision defining the duty of maintenance shall be construed as limiting any right given elsewhere in this Lease to alter, modify, demolish, remove, or replace any Improvement. No deprivation, impairment, or limitation of use resulting from any event or work contemplated by this Section shall entire Tenant to any abatement, deduction, diminution, offset, or reduction in rent nor to any termination or extension of the term, except as provided herein. (2) First-Class Condition Defined. 'First-class condition and repair,' means Restoration that is necessary to keep the 35'792~ (3) (4) Premises and Improvements in efficient and attractive condition, at least substantially equal in quality to the condition of the Improvements constructed by Tenant and to that maintained by managers of similar buildings and facilities in the area. The Agency and Tenant do not intend by the immediately preceding sentence that a property item is not first-class condition and repair merely because of ordinary and reasonable wear and tear that does not materially reduce the attractiveness or utility of the item. Restoration During ! rase Term. Tenant understands and agrees that, in order to (i) operate the Building in a first-class manner, (ii) maintain the Premises and Improvements in a first-class condition and repair, and (iii) to provide up-to-date facilities of first-class order, consideration of and the performance of periodic major restoration of the Improvements and all operations therein is necessary. Therefore, Tenant shall submit to Agency, prior to the expiration of the fifth (5th) year of the Lease and each five (5) years thereafter during the term of this Lease, a plan for major restoration of the Improvements. If any such restoration is not then required in Tenant's reasonable business judgment, Tenant shall not submit such a plan but shall state to Agency the reasons why such work is not required, which statement shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Agency. The plan (which shall be subject to the further provisions of this Section) shall provide for commencement of work within six months after the required submittal date. Agency shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to any submitted plan, and Tenant agrees to prepare and submit a new plan within 30 days of rejection of a plan by Agency. After approval of a plan by Agency, Tenant shall promptly secure all necessary permits, licenses and other approvals for the work and shall commence construction and thereafter shall diligently prosecute the same to completion as provided in the plan and in accordance with this Lease. Minor Construction. Agency's approval is not required for Tenant's minor restoration. "Minor' means an expenditure for restoration that does not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) ("Minor Amount"). Every five (5) years during the term of the Lease, the Minor Amount shall be increased (or decreased) proportionately to any increase (or decrease) in the 387921 All Urban Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles/ Anaheim/Long Beach areas ("CPI"), as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The increase (or decrease) in the Minor Amount shall be determined by multiplying Minor Amount by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Adjustment Index (as hereinafter defined) and the denominator of which is the Base Index (as hereinafter defined). The term "Base Index" as used in this Section is the CPI figure for the month prior to the month that rent commences hereunder as provided in Section 4(A) above. The term "Adjustment Index" as used in this Lease shall be the CPI figure closest to the date on which restoration is scheduled to commence, as this figure is recorded in the United States Department of Labor's most comprehensive official index then in use and most nearly similar and corresponding to the Base Index. If the Adjustment Index is calculated from a base different from the base used herein for the Base Index, the Base Index used for calculating the new Minor Amount shall first be converted to correspond to the Adjustment Index under a formula supplied by the Department of Labor. If the United States Department of Labor shall discontinue publication of the Base Index, and a consumer price index of the same type and character is determined and published by another department of the United States government, then the index most nearly similar to the Base Index shall be used for the computation contemplated herein. In the absence of any such official consumer price index published by a United States governmental agency, then the most nearly similar index published by a responsible private organization shall be used. 'Major" means all other restoration. Restoration cost shall include the actual cost to Tenant for any demolition and any removal of existing Improvements or parts of Improvements as well as for preparation, construction, and completion of all new Improvements or parts of Improvements. 20. ENTRY BY AGENCY. Agency may enter upon the Premises and improvements thereon at all reasonable times upon one business day's prior notice to Tenant to examine the condition thereof, including its environmental condition, and for the purpose of undertaking such maintenance and repairs as Agency elects to make pursuant to Section 19 above. 21. DISCRIMINATION. Tenant shall not discriminate, in the use of the Premises, against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, age or sex or for any other reason prohibited by law. 22. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Tenant shall not assign this Lease, or any interest therein, and shall not sublet the Premises, or any part thereof, or suffer any other person to occupy or use the Premises, or any improvement thereon, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the Agency, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Agency shall have the right to consider the qualifications of a proposed assignee or sublessee based upon its desire to locate and operate a first-class public transportation center and/or retail facility. Agency hereby consents to Tenant's leasing of retail space without further Agency approvals so long as any such lease is in accordance with restrictions on use set forth in this Lease and applicable zoning ordinances. Tenant shall pay Agency the reasonable costs incurred by the Agency to enable it to investigate the qualifications of a proposed assignee and reasonable attorney fees for any legal review of the documents involved. A consent to one assignment, subletting, occupation or use by another person shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment, subletting, occupation or use by another person. Any assignment, subletting occupation or use without such consent shall be void, and shall, at the option of Agency, terminate this Lease. 23. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES. At any time and from time to time, within fifteen (15) days after written notice of request by either party, the other party shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the requesting party, or to such other recipient as the notice shall direct, a statement certifying that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect or, if there have been written modifications, that it is in full force and effect as modified in the manner specified in the statement. The statement shall also state the dates to which the rent and any other charges have been paid in advance. The statement shall be such that it can be relied on by any auditor, creditor, commercial banker, investment banker or the like of either party and by any prospective purchaser or proposed assignee of the Premises. 24. INSOLVENCY OR BANKRUPTCY. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease, including without limitation Section 7 hereof, if Tenant shall be adjudged bankrupt or insolvent this Lease shall thereupon immediately terminate and the same shall not be assignable by any process of law, nor shall this Lease be treated as an asset of the Tenant under such adjudication, nor shall it pass under the control of any trustee or assignee by virtue of any process in bankruptcy or insolvency, or by execution or assignment for the benefit of creditors. If any such event occurs, this Lease shall immediately become null and void and of no effect, and Agency may immediately retake possession of the Premises. 357921 25. DEFAULT OR BREACH. A. Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, at any time one party is in default or breach of any provision of this Lease, the other party shall give written notice to remedy such default or breach. If the default or breach is remedied within ten (10) days following such notice, then this Lease shall continue in full force and effect. If, 1) such default or breach is not remedied within said 10 days, or 2) the nature of the default or breach is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within 10 days and the defaulting party fails to commence to cure within the 10 day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the cure to completion, then the non defaulting party may, at its option, terminate this Lease and take possession of the Premises without further notice and shall also have be entified to such damages or other remedies at law or in equity available to either party because of such default or breach. Termination of this Lease pursuant to this section, shall not be considered a waiver of damages or other remedies at law or in equity available to either party because of such default or breach. B. Each term and condition of this Lease shall also be deemed to be a covenant. A default under that certain Promissory Note dated 1996 by Dual Development in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) which has not been fully cured within the time required therein, shall constitute a default under this Lease. C. A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any provision of this Lease shall not constitute or be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other default or breach. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver; waivers on behalf of Agency shall be given by resolution of the Agency. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by either party shall give the other any contractual right by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. The subsequent acceptance of rent pursuant to this Lease shall not constitute a waiver of any precexling default by Tenant other than default in the payment of the particular rental payment so accepted, regardless of Agency's knowledge of the preceding breach at the time of accepting the rent; nor shall acceptance of rent or any other payment after expiration or termination constitute a reinstatement, extension, or renewal of the Lease or revocation of any notice or other act by Agency. 26. PARTIES BOUND AND BENEFITED. Each term, covenant and condition herein contained shall apply to, and be binding on, all successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 27. NO PARTNERSHIP OR JOINT VENTURE. Nothing in this Lease shall be construed to render the Agency in any way or for any purpose a partner, joint venturer, or associate in any relationship with Tenant other than that of landlord and tenant, nor shall this Lease be construed to authorize either to act as agent for the other. 28. TIME. Time and specific performance are each of the essence of this Lease. 29. CONDEMNATION. If the whole of the Premises shall be taken by a public entity under the power of eminent domain, this Lease shall terminate on the day of possession by the public entity. If only a part of the Premises shall be taken under eminent domain, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease upon written notice given within thirty (30) days after the day of possession by the public entity. If this Lease remains in effect, all of its provisions shall continue in full force and effect, except that the Annual Rent shall be adjusted proportionately from the date of the taking for the balance of the Lease term. If a taking under the power of eminent domain occurs, compensation attributable to the leasehold interest of Tenant shall belong to Tenant and compensation attributable to the reversionary interest of Agency shall belong to Agency. 30. TENANT'S DUTY TO REMOVE. Upon the expiration or termination of the Lease, the Tenant may remove all personal property, equipment and fixtures from the Premises, as such terms are defined or modified in Section 5(I), but shall surrender to the Agency the Premises with the Improvements in the condition required by the terms of this Lease. If any of Tenant's personal property, equipment or fixtures remain on the Premises after the expiration or termination of this Lease, Agency may, at its option, use, dispose of, and/or sell any of said property, equipment and fixtures without compensating Tenant for same and without the Agency having any liability whatsoever therefore. 31. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of, any right or obligation pursuant to, this Lease or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Lease, or for an unlawful detainer action, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. 32. NOTICES AND PAYMENTS. All notices required under this Lease, including change of address, shall be in writing, and all notices and payments shall be addressed as follows: Agency: Executive Director Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Copy to: Peter M. Thorson Burke, Williams & Sorensen 611 West Sixth Street, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, California 90017 Tenant: Dual Development Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle 41920 6th Street, Suite H Temecula, California 92590 Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one specified above. Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt by personal delivery or upon deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid. 33. SECTION HEADINGS. Section headings in this Lease are for convenience only and are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease. 34. INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION. This l_ease constitutes the entire agreement of the paxties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Lease may not be modified or amended except in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto and such modification or amendment must be approved by a resolution of the Agency. Both parties agree that no estoppel argument can be raised during legal proceedings in order to avoid the provisions of this section. 35. INTERPRETATION. Should interpretation of this Lease, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that the Lease was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and the Lease shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared it or caused it to be prepared. R:~A~AGEHDA,~DUAI] I=A..;E -21- ~,,~ 357921 36. VENUE. The Lease is made, entered into, and executed in Riverside County, California, and any action filed in any court from the interpretation, enforcement or other action arising from any term, covenant or condition herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Riverside County, California. 37. NO ARBITRATION. The parties do not intend to, nor do they agree to submit to arbitration any dispute of whatsoever kind or nature, including but not limited to unlawful detainer actions, which arise out of, or in any way relate to, this Lease. 38. PRIORITY OF DOCUMENTS. The parties hereto contemplate entering into additional agreements respecting the loan of funds by Agency to Tenant to construct, in whole or in part, the Improvements, specified at Section 5, on the Premises. In the event of any conflict respecting the terms of this Lease and such other agreements, the terms of this Lease shall prevail. ///// /11/I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Lease Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representat. ives as of the date first written above. REDEVELOPMENT AOENCY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA Chairperson ATTEST: June'S'.--Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: eter M. Thorson, City Attorney DUAL DEVEL~~ .~ INC. Edward Dool, Vice President -23- CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 387921 State of California Coun~ of Riverside On 9/11/96 before me, Susan w. Jones, Notary Public , OAT~ NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER - EG. ',JANE DOE.. NOTARY PU~mLIC' personally appeared Edward Dool and Kathleen Dool NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S} [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument ana ac- knowledged to me that ho/,.~~executed the same in hic/hc th~/,~..~ authox~ capacity(ies), and that by his/he thfJ.._h..~ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL, Though the data below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons rely,rig on t~e document and could prevent fraudulent reat~act~ment of this fonm. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL ~ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ~, PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED ~ GENERAL [] A'F'FORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Ground Lease TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 30 NUMBER OF PAGES March 13, 1996 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON, S) OR ENTITYlIES) _ _ SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NA~ED ABOVE ~)1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave., PO. Box 7184 · Canoga Part(, CA 91309-7184 EXHIBIT "A" 387921 That portion of Lot 1 of Tract Map 23925, as shown by Map on file in Book 209 of Maps at pages 21 through 23, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of said Lot 1; Thence North 44° 25' 45" East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot, a distance of 147.87 feet; Thence South 45° 34' 15" East, a distance of 26.98 feet; Thence South 44° 25' 45" West, a distance of 18.33 feet; Thence South 45° 30' 01" East, a distance of 2.21 feet; Thence South 05° 45' 17" West, a distance of 35.51 feet; Thence South 45° 30' 01" East, a distance of 68.87 feet; Thence South 14° 29' 59" West, a distance of 36.24 feet; Thence South 440 29' 59" West, a distance of 9.50 feet; Thence South 45° 30' 01" East, a distance of 11.62 feet to a point in the northwesterly right-of-way line of 6th Street as shown on said map; feet; Thence South 44° 25' 43" West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 43.98 Thence South 85° 53' 32" West along said fight-of-way line, a distance of 22.69 feet to a point in the northeasterly right-of-way line of Front Street as shown on said map; Thence North 45° 30' 01" West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 134.92 feet to the Point of Beginning. 95-0212JLca.~¢ Pat.d~ coniaming 0.37 acres, more or less. PREPARF:.D UNDER MY SUPERVISION: Matthew E. Webb, L.S. 5529 Prepared by: ~.,tjg Checked by: ,an ~w 552.9 95-0212/'t.ea.~P at .des UNE L1 L2 I..3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 Lll L12 SCALE: DATE: DR. BY: W.O.: F.B.: SCALE: N44'25'45"£ N44'25'45'E N45'30'01'~/ S05.45' 1 '7' W N45.30'O1'W N14'29'59" £ N44'29'59" E N45.30'01'~ ~44'25'43'E N85.53'32' E N45.30'01'W S45' 34' 15' E 1" =80' 2/16/96 95-0212 1"=80' ~ 147.87' 18.33' 2.21' 35.51' 68.87' 36.24' 9.50' 11.62' 43.98' 22.69' 134.92' 26.98' I ~ MERCEDES~STRE_~T ~ N4~'30'43' W 30' 30' LEASE PARCEL L~ n' 16,000 S.F. OR 0.37 ~C. ,~ 30'; 30' N45'30'01'W /_ sY £ r EXHIBIT "1" LEASE PARCEL AI.BERT A. WE33B ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA SHEET OF 1 FILE NO.: 1 SHEETS 96 387920 R~CORDED AT REQUEST OF AND WHEN RF~ORDED RETURN TO: RECEIVED FOR RECr qD AT 8:00 O'CLOCK Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 OCT - 9 1996 By FIRST AMEND1V[ENT TO GROUND LEASE BY ,4aND tft~'t ~t"E~ ~ I~DEV~'~IOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC., dba TEMECULA SHUTI'LE THIS FIRST AMENDNIENT TO GROUND LEASE is made and entered into as of August 27, 1996 by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic, as Lessor (hereafter "Agency"), and Dual Development, Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle, a California corporation, as tenant (hereafter "Tenant"). The parties agree as follows: 1. This First Amendment to Ground Lease is made with respect to the following facts, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the parties: a. On March 13, 1996, the parties entered into that certain Lease entitled "Ground Lease by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development, Inc., Temecula Shuttle." (the "Lease"); b. The property which is leased to the Tenant pursuant to the Lease is generally described as approximately 16,000 square feet at the comer of Sixth Street and Front Street and is legally described and depicted on Exhibit A., attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full; and c. The parties desire to establish a new commencement date for the term of the Lease in order to accommodate the work preparatory to commencement of construction. R:~ziglerg~dooKea.ee 1 August 15, 1996 Section 2. A. of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: "A. Initial Term. Unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in this Lease, the term of this Lease shall be thirty (30) years commencing on November 1, 1996 and ending October 31, 2026. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, whenever reference is made in this Lease to the term of this Lease, such reference shall include any extension of the term of this Lease. read as follows: Sections 4.B. and 4.C. of the Lease are hereby amended to "B. On the first five year anniversary of this Lease November 1, 2001, and on each subsequent five year anniversary during the initial term and extended term, if any, of this Lease, the Base Rent described at subsection 'A" above shall be increased by an amount which is 8% greater than the Base Rent (including previous rent adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year period. "C. On the first twentieth year anniversary of this Lease November 1, 2016, Agency shall cause the property to be reappraised at its then existing fair market value, and the Minimum Annual Rental shall be adjusted to ten percent (10%) of the appraised fair market value. Thereafter, on each subsequent five year anniversary of this Lease, including extensions, if any, the Minimum Annual Rental shall be increased by an amount which is ten percent (10%) greater than the Base Rent (including previous rental adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year period. follows: 4. Section 25 B. of the Lease is hereby amended to read as "B. Each term and condition of this Lease shall also be deemed to be a covenant. A default under the Promissory Note in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to be entered into between the Agency and Lessee for the development of the Premises which has not been fully cured with the time required therein, shall constitute a default under this Lease." R:~zigle~g\doo#ee.~e :2 Augu.t 15, 1986 387920 5. Section 32 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: "Notices ~ncl PAyments. All notices required under this Lease, including change of address, shall be in writing, and all notices and payments shall be addressed as follows: "Agency: Executive Director Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 "Copy of Notices Only to: Peter M. Thorson Richards, Watson & Gershon 333 South Hope Street, 38th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 "Tennnt: Dual Development Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle 41920 6th Street, Suite H Temecula, California 92590 "Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one specified above. Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt by personal delivery or upon deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid." 6. Except as specifically amended by this First Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. IIIII R:~zioleql~doollea.a® 3 Augue*. 15. 1 gg6 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 3579~0 State of California County of Riverside On 9/11/96 before me, Susan w. Jones, Notary Public , DATE NAA4~. TITLE OF OFFICER · E.G.. 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared Edward Dool and Kathleen Dool NAI~E{S) OF SIGNER{SI [] personally known tO me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their ..... " .......... instrument the person(s) signature{s) on the . , or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument, WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable io persons relying on the document and could preven! Iraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER TITLEIS) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] A'I'-r'ORNEY-tN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT 1st Amendment to Ground Lease TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 7 NUMBER OF PAGES 8/27/96 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF F'ER$ON~$) OR ENTITYlIES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA g1309-7184 367920 EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Lot 1 of Tract Map 23925. as shown by Map on file in Book 209 of Maps at pages 21 through 23, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of said Lot 1; Thence North 44° 25' 45" East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot, a distance of 147.87 feet; Thence South 45° 34' 15" East, a distance of 26.98 feet; Thence South 440 25' 45" West, a distance of 18.33 feet; Thence South 45° 30' 01" East, a distance of 2.21 feet; Thence South 05° 45' 17" West, a distance of 35.51 feet; Thence South 45° 30' 01" East, a distance of 68.87 feet; Thence South 14° 29' 59" West, a distance of 36.24 feet; Thence South 440 29' 59" West, a distance of 9.50 feet; Thence South 45° 30' 01" East, a distance of 11.62 feet to a point in the northwesterly fight-of-way line of 6th Street as shown on said rnap; feet; Thence South 44° 25' 43" West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 43.98 Thence South 85° 53' 32" West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 22.69 feet to a point in the northeasterly right-of-way line of Front Street as shown on said map; Thence North 45° 30' 01" West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 134.92 feet to the Point of Beginning. 95-0212/Lea,,ePat.des Containing 0.37 acres, more or less. PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION: Matthew E. Webb, L.S. 5529 Prepared by: ~- Checked by: A4 ~ 387920 NO. 5529 OV ~51~~ 95-0212./LeasePat.d~s . ...-~-- -- 36~7920 SCALE: 1"=80' SCALE: DATE: DR. BY: W.O.: F.B.: I UNE 8EARII~ OISrANCE L1 N44'2§'45" E 147.87' 1.2 N44'25'45"E 18.~Y L.~ N45'~0'0 I'W 2.21' L4 S05'45'17'~/ 35.51' L5 N45'30'01'W 68.87' L6 N14'29'59' E 36.24' L7 N44'29'59' E 9.50' L8 N45'30'01' W 11.62' L9 N44'2§'4~E 45.98' L10 N85'SY32'E 22.6g' L11 N45'30'01'W 154.92' L12 545'34'15'E 26.98' L ~ I %_ I ' ~ ~'RCEDES~$TRE ~ - N4~'30'43" W ~ 30' 30' % I F~ONY L5 LEASE PARCEL 16,000 S.F. OR 0.37 AC. ~ 30' I 30' EXHIBIT "1" 1" =80' 2/16/96 95-0212 LEASE PARCEL ALBERT A. ~ ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA SHEET OF 1 FILE NO.: 1 SHEETS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to Lease to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA icia H. Birdsall Chairperson ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC. By Edward Dool, Vice President R:~ziglerg\doollea.se 4 Augur1:15, 1996 ITEM 3 · ADPROVA?. CITY ATTORNEy CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Agency Directors Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director April 22, 1997 Review and Approval of the 1996-97 Mid-Year Budgets RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Agency maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Human Resources and Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of projected personnel costs. Additionally, staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has identified any material adjustments required. The mid-year budget review includes the RDA Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and the Debt Service Fund. Activity in each fund is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Summary of Revenues. Fxpenditures. and Fund Ralances: Presents a summary of prior year and 1996-97 year-to-date actual activity, as well as 1996-97 current and proposed budget amounts. Also included is a schedule of beginning and estimated ending fund balances based upon the proposed budget activity. Revenue !~etail: Presents detail of prior year and 1996-97 year-to-date revenues, as well as the 1996-97 current and revised projected revenues. Expenditure line-Item Detail: Presents expenditure line-item detail by department for prior year and year-to-date actual activity, as well as the 1996-97 current and proposed budget amounts. The projected RDA revenues reflect a $738,659 increase over the original budget estimate. This is primarily due to an increase in the assessed valuation in the project area which has resulted in a $666,221 increase in property tax increment revenue. A total net increase in RDA expenditures of $226,535 is proposed. The significant proposed expenditure adjustments are as follows: low/Moderate Income Ho~,sing Fund: A $10,564 increase in personnel costs is proposed for additional project employee help (an office tech and management assistant) to assist in the administration of various housing-related projects. C.~ital Projects Fund: A $35,000 increase in legal costs is anticipated, due to costs incurred relating to the Old Town Entertainment Project and public improvement projects. r~ebt Rervice Fund: A $168,391 increase is required for amounts due to local governmental agencies under pass-through agreements. This increase is due to the corresponding increase in gross property tax increment revenue to be received by the Agency. AUTHORITFD POSITIONS No changes are proposed to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed mid-year adjusted budget reflects a net increase of $512,124 from the current budget estimate in the projected total RDA fund balances at June 30, 1997. Attachments: Resolution No. RDA 97-m 1996-97 Temecula Redevelopment Agency Mid-Year Budget 2 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97- A RF_SOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA Rk'~EVF~OPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS WHEREAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) operating budgets. WHEREAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the RDA maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. ~, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules. The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1996-97 RDA operating budgets are amended in accordance with the attached schedules. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April, 1997. ATTEST: Steven I. Ford, Chairperson June S. Greek, Board Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF ~ULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO I-IF~R~RY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of April, 1997, by the following roll call vote: AGENCY MF~MBERS: NOF~: AGENCY MF~MBERS: AGENCY MKMBERS: June S. Greek, Board Secretary 4 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMARY OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES. AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ,-97 (MID-YEAR) Total Revenues Total Expenditures by Fund: Low/Moderate Income Housing Capital Projects Debt Service Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 96-97 96-97 96-97 Proposed 95-96 YTD Current Proposed Increase Actual ~ 12/31/96 Budget Budget (Decrease) 9.536.296 538.116 7.471.344 8.210.003 738.659 568.213 1.421.116 2.169.348 2.182.012 12.664 3.447.257 2.692.136 13.444.957 13.490.437 45.480 5.134.207 431.266 5.097.411 5.265.802 168.391 9.149.677 4.544.518 20.711.716 20.938.251 226.535 386.619 (4.006.402) (13.240.372) (12.728.248) 512.124 Fund Balances. Beg. of Year Revenues .nditures Fund Balances. End of Year 23.029.547 9.536.296 (9.149.67~ 23.416.166 23.416.166 8.210.003 ~0.938.251) 10.687.918 mcderm~midyea~deptsum.wb2 09-A~r-97 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE DETAIL FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FUND 165 LOW/MOD HOUSING 4015 -Tax Increment 4060 -Miscellaneous 4065 -Investment Interest 4075 -Rental Income TOTAL LOW/MOD HOUSING F FY 95-96 ACTUALS 1,216,172 2,828 168,146 1,387,146 FY 96-97 YTD ~12/31/96 1 88,085 25,784 113,870 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT 1,150,648 150,000 140,587 1,441,235 YTD % OF BDGT 0.00% 58.72% 18.34% 7.90% FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT 1,283,892 150,000 140,587 1,574,479 CHANGE IN BDGT 133,244 133,244 FUND 280 CIP 4065 -Investment Interest 4066 -Loan Interest 4068 -Loan Fees 4075 -Rental Income 4090 -Operating Transfers In 4093 -Advances From Other Fund~ TOTAL CIP FUND FY 95-96 ACTUALS 850,583 15,986 682 75,000 335,042 940,896 2,218,189 FY 96-97 Y'rD ~12/31/96 259,774 15,066 350 61,750 336,940 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT 375,000 15,000 500 102,000 492,500 YTD % OF BDGT 69.27% 100.44% 70.00% 60.54% 68.41% FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT 375,000 15,000 5OO 102,000 492,500 CHANGE IN BDGT FUND 380 DEBT SERVICE 4015 4O62 '4065 4092 -Tax Increment -Recovery of Pdor Year Expense -Investment Interest -Deferred Passthrough TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND FY95-96, FY96-97 FY96-97 YTD% FY96-97 CHAN ACTUALS Y'rD~.12/31/96 ORIG BDGT OF BDGT REVISED BDGT IN BD~ 4,870,734 10,381 4,602,592 0.23% 5,135,569 532,977 759 154,858 76,166 125,000 60.93% 125,000 905,369 810,017 882,455 72,438 5,930,961 87,306 5,537,609 1.58% 6,143,024 605,415 2 m cde~nfimiclyear~97rev.wq 1 0Cj_Aor.g7 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOWIMOD SET ASIDE FUND 165 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT INCREASE (DECREASE) 14,796 23,831 45,705 45,562 (143) 2,122 3,250 6,882 6,860 (22) 189 408 698 950 252 26 46 74 31 132 20O 399 522 232 145 171 190 69 235 50 74 688 750 559 995 5,195 8,000 2,500 78 19,026 4,227 158 127 70,534 559 1,353 5,184 17,475 655 2,500 81,098 77 34,271 358 (11) (8,000) 17,475 655 10,564 R:~CDE RM'I'~MIDYEAR~97MY-LOW.WB2 03/28 20:29 RDA LOW/MOD-FUND 165 ACCT NO. 5246 5248 5250 5258 5261 5262 5330 5480 5804 5449 5804 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES LEGAL SERVICES CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES CONFERENCES STAFF TRAININGIEDUCATION MILEAGE INSURANCE OPER & MAINT - PUJOL, SHERWOOD AFFORDABLE RENTAL UNITS FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER PROGRAM ClP-LOWlMOD HOUSING PROJ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL RDA LOWIMOD SET ASIDE FY 95-96 ACTUALS 12,531 47,277 18,857 570 67 469,885 549,187 568,213 FY 96-97 AT 12/31196 6,815 21,885 1,714 22O 22 11,125 1,289,322 33,044 22,698 1,386,845 1,421,116 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 20,000 60,000 25,000 50O 2,000 102,314 1,439,000 250,000 200,000 2,098,814 2,169,348 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 20,000 60,000 25,000 500 2,000 2,100 102,314 1,439,000 250,000 200,000 2,100,914 2,182,012 PAGE 2 INCRE (DECREAse) 2,100 2,100 4 R:~CDERMTWIIDYEAR~97MY-LOW.WB2 03/28 20:29 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 5199 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LiFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE BENEFITS ADVANCED TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 280 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 43,562 31,904 99,230 84,271 (14.959) 6,248 4,388 8,749 12,688 3.939 879 764 1,539 1,924 385 88 60 1,064 212 365 251 1,361 729 603 388 222 254 503 258 78 83 1,959 1,050 2,638 2,189 5,771 21,444 19,711 787 767 377 392 48,000 1,800 78 77 13 79,631 61,288 169,916 2.932 2,738 9,119 10.140 48,000 1,445 400 173,657 294 549 3,348 10.140 (355) 4OO 3,741 R:~ICDERMT~IDYEAR~97MY-280.WB2 03/29 11:45 RDA CIP-FUND 280 ACCT NO. 5212 5220 5222 5226 5227 5228 5230 5246 5248 5250 5254 5258 5260 5261 5262 5264 5270 5276 5345 5360 5362 5367 5385 5391 5901 VAR ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES FACIUTY REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING LEGAL SERVICES CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES ADVERTISING CONFERENCES PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CITY PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM SALES TAX REIMBURSEMENTS SUPPORT SERVICES CITY ADMIN CHAF~GES OLD TOWN PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AUTO DEALER ASSN. LOAN FEE REIMBURSEMENTS INTEREST OPERATING TRANSFER OUT TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL RDA CIP FY 95-96 ACTUALS 22,025 7O7 810 4,432 1,841 437 7,001 59,966 46,579 12,762 4,015 11 435 149 97 197,021 70.214 168,084 75,000 1,147 22,725 695,458 2,672,268 3,447,257 FY 96-97 AT 12/31196 5,194 281 308 3,220 223 8,396 48,463 26,873 7.729 842 980 188 96 110 162,702 64,436 1,833 37,500 369,374 2,261,474 2,692,136 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 12,000 5OO 1,301 3,495 500 13,700 70,000 202,727 29,199 4,000 3,200 500 3,300 250 207,300 148,848 238,000 75,000 62.500 140,000 30,000 258,870 1,505.190 11,769,851 13,444,957 FY96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 12,000 5OO 1,301 3,495 50O 13,700 105,000 202,727 29,199 4,000 3.200 5O0 3,300 250 207,300 148,848 238,000 6,739 75,000 62,500 140,000 30,000 258,870 1,546.929 11,769,851 13,490,437 PAGE 2 INCRE (DECREASE) 35,000 6,739 41,739 6 R:WICDERMTWIIDYEAR~97MY-280.WB2 03/31 18 01 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DEBT SERVICE FUND 380 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET ACCT NO. 5227 5231 5241 5390 5391 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES PROPERTY TAX ADMIN FEES PASSTHROUGH AGREEMENTS DEBT SERVICE-PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT 4,733 1,931 6,000 6,000 61,585 95,000 95,000 3,619,819 3,547,741 3,716,132 560,000 590,000 590,000 888,070 429,335 858,670 858,670 5,134,207 431,266 5,097,411 5,265,802 INCREASE (DECREASE) 168,391 168,391 TOTAL RDA DEBT SERVICE 5,134,207 431,266 5,097,411 5,265,802 168, 391 7/Final 97MY-380.WB2 03/29 12:50 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING' AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 8, 1997 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 8:21 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Karel F. Linderoans presiding. PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans, Stone BOARD MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes It was moved by Board Member Birdsall, seconded by Board Member Ford, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1 as follows: 1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of March 25, 1997. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone abstaining. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Birdsall, seconded by Board Member Ford, to adjourn at 8:21 PM to a meeting on April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/Authority Secretary Minutes.fa\040897 - 1 - OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 8, 1997 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority was called to order at 8:21 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans presiding. PRESENT: 5 BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Birdsall, seconded by Board Member Ford, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997. The motion was unanimously carried. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Stone, seconded by Board Member Birdsall, to adjourn at 8:22 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans, Stone None ATTEST: Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary Minutes.ia\040897 -1 - TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO~,, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII~A~E, -'~'~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director~;;~- April 22, 1997 Planning Application No, PA96-0293 (Development Plan - Appeal) - the design and construction of 20,619 square feet of commercial development located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Pauba Road (Ted Zonos Applicant) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1, Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No, PA96-0293; 2. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; 3. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 20,619 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.54 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-110-003 BACKGROUND The project was originally heard by the Commission at their January 27, 1997 meeting and was continued by the Commission to February 24, 1997. The Commission had concerns regarding the aesthetics of the building, site design and overall compatibility of the project with the surrounding area. The applicant was directed by the Commission to revisit the design of the project. Commissioners Miller and Webster were appointed to meet with the project proponent and staff. The original site plan, landscape plan and elevations are included as Attachment No. 7 to this Staff Report. Staff met with the applicant several times prior to the February 24, 1997 Planning Commission meeting and a number of elements suggested by Staff and the Commissioners were incorporated into the final design. As a result of these meetings, and the direction provided by R:~STAFFRFI'~93PA96.CCI 4/14/97 Idb 1 the Planning Commission, the applicant re-submitted a revised site plan, landscape plan and elevations. These plans are included as Attachment No. 8 to this Staff Report. The revised plans represented a substantial improvement in the quality of the design for the project. The changes are: The massing of the buildings was significantly reduced by creating three (3) separate buildings; Building facades were further articulated through the use of pitched roofs, cornices, arches, awnings and trellises; The number of parking spaces was reduced; The amount landscaping on the site was increased; and Several well-defined seating areas were identified on the plan. Several citizens spoke at both the January 27, 1997 and February 24, 1997 hearings expressing their concerns about the project. These included: proximity of the project to the Rancho California Sports Park, Temecula Valley High School and the Linfield School; an increase in traffic and potential hazards from traffic; potential for loitering at the site and the future potential for sales of alcoholic beverages in proximity to sensitive uses. In addition, Staff received several phone calls and letters in opposition to the project before and after the Commission meeting. Letters received before the Commission hearing were forwarded to the Commission for their consideration. These received after the hearing are included in Attachment No. 6 to this Staff Report. The project was approved by the Planning Commission at their February 24, 1997 meeting by a unanimous (5-0) vote. The Commission was able to make the necessary findings, which included consistency with the City's General Plan and Development Code, for approval of the project and stated the following reasons for their support of the project: The applicant had addressed their aesthetic concerns; The applicant had addressed concerns of the neighbors; and The plan is a good plan and would work for the neighborhood. At the direction of the Council in September, 1996, Councilmember Roberts met with the Applicant's representatives and with representatives of the resident's living near the proposed project site in order to discuss the residents' concerns and to try to mediate a resolution of the these concerns. The Planning Commission's decision to approve the project was appealed by Councilmember Roberts on March 7, 1997. A copy of his memorandum concerning the appeal is included as Attachment No. 2 of this Staff Report. The applicant has refined the colors and materials for the project after the Planning Commission approval. Color elevations, as well as a color board are provided with the Council's full size exhibits for the project. The question of whether alcoholic beverages can be sold on the site is not before the Council at this time. Any tenant on the site which would propose to sell alcohol as a part of any use (such as a market, liquor store, or restaurant) would need to obtain approval of a conditional use permit following a public hearing and approval of a finding that the sale of alcohol is necessary and convenient. R:k~TAFFRPT~93PAg/i. CC1 4/14/9"/ldb 2 FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. City Council Resolution - Page 4 Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Page 8 Appeal Memorandum - Page 20 Planning Commission Staff Report (January 27, 1997) - Page 21 Planning Commission Staff Report (February 24, 1997) - Page 22 Planning Commission Minutes (January 27, 1997) - Page 23 Planning Commission Minutes (February 24, 1997) - Page 24 Correspondence - Page 25 Exhibits (Original Project) - Page 26 Exhibits (Revised Project Approved by Planning Commission) - Page 27 R:~qTAFFRPT~293PA96.CCI 4114/9'/klb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:k~TAFFRF1~293PA96.CCI 4/14/~7 ~ 4 ATrACIiMI=~NT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOP~NT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMIgSION'S DECISION APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMRNT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 20,619 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.54 ACRES LOCATEr) ON THE SOIYYHWF~T CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-110-00~ WHEREAS, Ted Zonos flied Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96- 0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA96- 0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997, to February 24, 1997; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96- 0293 (Development Plan) on February 24, 1997 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan); WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan - Appeal) was filed on March 7, 1997; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan - Appeal) on April 22, 1997, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA96-0293; RASTAFFRPT~93PA96.CCI 4114197 klb ~ WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA96-0293; NOW, TlCrEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. fmdings; to wit: Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan - Appeal), upholding the Planning Commission's decision and approving Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) to design and construct a 20,619 square foot commercial development on a parcel containing 2.54 acres located on the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Pauba Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 945-110-003 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~STAFFRFF~93PA96.CC1 4/14/97 ~ 6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of April, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of April, 1997 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:~STAFFRPT~293PA96.CCI 4/14/97 kib 7 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~ST~93PA96.CCl 4114/97 klb 8 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA96-0293 {Development Plan) Project Description: The design and construction of 19,729 20,619 square foot commercial development on 2.54 acres Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-110-003 Approval Date: February 24, 1997 Expiration Date: February 24, 1999 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. R:\STAFFRPT~93PA96.CCI 4/14/97 klb 9 The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D, as approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0293, or as amended by these conditions. a. Nine (9) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided. b. Seventy-seven (77) parking spaces shall be provided. c. Four (4) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. A wrought iron fence shall be installed at the top of the retaining wall for safety purposes. The height of the fence shall be approved by the Planning Manager. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit E, or as amended by these conditions. Planters at the rear of the building shall contain a mixture of trees, shrubs, groundcover end vines. Additional trees shall be added to the planters. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). Varieties of trees, in addition to the proposed Crepe Myrtles; shall be planted at the rear (adjacent to the drive lane). (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997}. Mature trees shall be added to the front of the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit F (Elevations) and Exhibit G (Color Elevations), or as amended by these conditions. Envelopes for wall-mounted signage are conceptual only. Businesses may have one (1) wall mounted sign located over their suite in accordance with the City's current sign ordinance. Maximum area for the sign shall also be in accordance with the City's sign ordinance in effect at the time of permit issuance. P,.:'~'TAFFP,.FI~.93PAg~.CCl 4114/9"/ldb 1 0 Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H (color and material board), or as amended by these conditions. Materials Colors Tile (roof) Concrete (entry paving) Concrete (sidewalk paving) Cost Stone (column base) Stucco (building) Stucco (building) Glass (windows) Wood (trellises) Metal (mullions) Tiles (rosettes) Stone (cornice) Monier Mission Tile '16682" Chromix Admixture C-22 'Coral Red" Chromix Admixture 'Summer Beige" Dura Art Stone S-4 'Tan" La Habra Stucco X-73 'Eggshell" La Habra Stucco X-73 'Pure Ivory" Clear Frazee #4925A' Blue Spruce" Frazee #6265R 'Mayan Brick" DaI-Tile Dura Art Stone S-3 'White" Directional signs, the monument sign and accent paving shall conform substantially with Exhibit I, or as amended by these conditions. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation). 10. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid. 12. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 13. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. 14. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. R:~STAFFRFf~93PA96.CCl 4/141~7 klb 1 1 Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager. 16. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view. 17. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 18. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 19. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone 20. 21. 22. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.CCI 4/14/97 ~ 1 2 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 23. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 24. Submit at time of plan review, complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 25. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to the commencement of any construction work. 26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 27. All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1994). 28. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 29. Show path of accessibility from the parking to the furthest point of improvement. 30. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 31. Provide fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. 32. Provide an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 34. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for panel review. 35. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record, the truss manufacturers engineer, and that have been plan checked and stamped by the plan check agency and the City are required before sheet and shear inspection. 36. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. R:'~TAFFRP'I~293PA96.CCI 4/14/97 klb 13 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. General Requirements 37. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 39. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 40. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 41. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDE$ Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 42. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California California Department of Fish and Game Army Corps of Engineers Planning Department Department of Public Works 43. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. R:~STAFFRPTL?.93PA9~.CCI 4/14/9'7 klb 14 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide for underground drainage facilities to collect and convey the runoff from this site to the existing underground downstream drainage facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. A drainage easement shall be provided for construction and maintenance of the drainage structure outlet. The drainage easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. Graded but undeveloped land shall be stabilized from erosion to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. An Area Drainage Plan fee shall be paid to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by the Riverside Transit Authority. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. R:\STAFFRPT~93PA96.CCI 4/14/97 idb 1 5 Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 55. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pauba Road in accordance with City Standards including provisions for the interconnect. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997. 56. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. An Encroachment Permit will be required for any work 'performed within the City right-of-way. The following design criteria shall be observed: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. fo All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. 57. The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Improve Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. R:~STAFFRFI'~93PA96.CC1 4114/97 Ub 1 6 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. Improve Pauba Road (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transitions to existing street sections. A Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, and approved by the Department of Public Works. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Margarita Road and Pauba Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. The Developer is eligible for credit for regional signal facilities installed by her/him. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. The Developer shall obtain an easement for the driveway located on Pauba Road for ingress and egress over the adjacent property between parcels 3 and 4. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee R:~TAPFRFI'V293PA96.CCl 4114197 klb 17 for this project; provided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Prior to Issuance of · Certificate of Occupancy 66. The traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pauba Road shall be installed and operational. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). 67. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works 68. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 69. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 70. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 71. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 72. Upon installation of street lighting on Pauba and Margarita Roads, the developer/applicant shall dedicate all street lights to the City pursuant to TCSD standards. {Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). 73. The landscape improvements within the median on Margarita Road shall be reviewed and inspected pursuant to all applicable TCSD standards and specifications. {Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 74. In conformance with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan, the developer/applicant shall provide a four (4) foot equestrian trail easement adjacent to the public right-of way along Pauba Road. All trees, irrigation pedestals, and other permanent structures shall be installed outside of this easement. The easement is for the future extension of the City's trail program, and the developer shall not be responsible for the installation of the trail improvements. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). R:~'TAFFR.WI~93PA96.CCI 4/14/97 klb 18 Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 75. The developer/applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans for the landscape median to the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent for review and approval, prior to the installation of the improvements. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing February 24, 1997). OTHER AGENCIES 76. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Fire Department's transmittal dated January 21, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 77. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 4, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 78. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 79. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 5, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 80. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 81. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Applicant Name R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.CCI 4114/97 k~b 19 City of Temecula 43200 Bus~ne~s PZ~k Drive · Temeo.~. c_..A 92590 · M~ng,o~c~e= P O Box c~033 · Ternecula. c_..A 92589-7033 (909] 694-6444 · Fax 1909J 694-I999 January 21, 1997 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MATTHEW FAGAN RE: PA96-0293 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial building using the procedures established in Ordinance 546. A fire flow of 1750 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual opera~g pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"x4"x2-2 1/1"), will be located no less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be -~igned by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a plan check fee of $582.00 to the City of Temecula. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to install a fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buildings/suites. If building/suite requires Hazardous Material Reporting (Material Safety Data Sheets) the Knox HAZ MAT Data and key storage cabinets shall be installed. If building/suites are protected by a fire or burglar alarm system, the boxes will require ~Tamper" monitoring. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. All exit doors shall be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. It is prohibited to use/process or store any materials in this occupancy that would classify it as an "H~ occupancy per Chapter 9 of the Uniform Building Code. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. Prior to final instx~tion of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Depamnent for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 12 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to the issuance of building permits the developer shall pay to the City of Temecula, the sum of $.25 per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building ano Safety Office. Please contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section (909)694-6439. Brian Hampton Fire Safety Specialist John F. Hennliar E. P '~nh" I.emons Kenneth C. Deuly Perry R. Louck November 4, 1996 Mr. Craig Ruiz, Assistant Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 , By SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8455 APN 945-110-003 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 96-0293 Dear Mr. Ruiz: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 96/SB mc20&q=012ACEF c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Ea$lern ] unicjpal V,.. er District craig Ruiz City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 i%C,%PAL /Y4'~ November 8, 1996 3 1996 By SUBJECT: P&96-0293 (Parcel 4, PM 84S5) - Agency Case Transmittal Dear Mr. Ruiz: We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: GENERAT. Our understanding is the subject project is to develop 2.76 acres on Parcel 4 of PM 8455 (APN 945-110-003) into a retail commercial center. The subject project site is located on the southwesterly corner of Pauba and Margarita Roads. The project includes a 3,113 square foot Building A and the 16,616 square foot Building B. EMWD reviewed PA96-0119 in July of 1996 for this same parcel of land. The previous project is similar to the proposed subject project except phasing of the building construction is not planned. EMWD comments are similar to those for the previous project and are reiterated below. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. The available service capabilities of the District's systems are constantly changing. Hence, service to the subject project is dependent upon the available capacity of the District's systems at the time service agreements are made with EMWD. DOMESTIC WATF. R The project is outside of EMWD's water service area. Potable water must be arranged with the Rancho California Water District. Mail to: Post Office Box 8300 · San jacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, 5an Jacinto · Customer Service / Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue. Fiemet. CA Operations &: Maintenance Center: ._, 0 Trumblc Road, Pettis. CA 92571 Telet~hone (90'I) 928.3'7-" ~, ,,~nc~ ~.~ Craig Ruiz PA 96-0293 Page 2 SANITARY SEWER The subject project is tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. For service from EMWD, an 8- inch gravity sanitary sewer must be extended in Margarita Road, 650 feet southerly from Rancho Vista, to the project site. Construction drawings for such a sewer main have been approved by EMWD (SD-14741 to 14743). However, these drawings must be updated to conform to current EMWD standards. Before construction can begin, the revisions and a Waste Discharge Application must be completed by the Developer and approved by EMWD. RECLAIMED WATF. R The project is outside of the EMWD's water service area. Reclaimed water must be arranged with the Rancho California Water District. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Additions or improvements to off-site facilities are required to adequately serve the subject project. This letter serves as the Plan-of-Service for the subject project. The project is being processed through the Customer Service Department for completion of the plan check process. Tracking of the subject project is being coordinated through the "One-Stop" program by Ms. Judy Conacher at (909)766-1810, ext. 4409. Thank you for soliciting our concerns. If you have any questions regarding the above matter, please call me at (909) 766-1810. Sincerely, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Mike Gow Civil Engineer Customer Service Department cc: Judy Conacher, Development Coordinator - EMWD Karl Roland, Project Engineer - EMWD ., .w-, : ~, L ....kR~ · -',EN_A~E ~ 1E[ A029 ~. 1~9~ TO: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DATE: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: Craig Ruiz FROM t~ GREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV By RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA96-0293 - Formerly PP 226 - Now Expired November 5, 1996 1 5 199B Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA96-0293 and has no objections. 2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (358-5055) will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2). Waste reduction management. GD:dr (909) 285-8980 cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials Branch November 8, 1996 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Th,rd Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside. CA 92517 Phone: (909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) 684-1007 Mr. Craig Ruiz Temecu!a Planning r)epa.."tment 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RE: PA96-0293 Dear Mr. Ruiz: Currently our Route #23 travels S.W. along Pauba Road and N.W. along Margarita Road. We do not provide service on Margarita Road past Pauba Road; however, based upon our plans for future growth, we are requesting a bus turnout be incorporated into the general design. An ideal site for the bus turnout would be on Margarita Road near Building "B" between the HC Path-of-Travel and the driveway, where the sidewalk is adjacent to the curb. I can indicate the exact location for the bus turnout as the project progresses. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Should you require additional information or specifications, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, M. Anne Newvine Transit Planner MAN:cam cc: Planning Files DAVID P. ZAPPE City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 ^.endon: RR Z- Ladies and Gentlemen: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FI,()OD CON'FRO AND WATER CONSI.. RVA'HON DISI'RIC] 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/2 ?.~- 1200 3~3~ I l 1996 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The Distnct also does not plan ch_eck city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In acldl;ion, infforrr, stion of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endomement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: c.'"'"'~This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrahve fees will be required. This project propos.e. s cha. nnets, storm drains 36 inches or larger.in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainag.e...Plan. The District would consider accep. tin~ ownership of such .faci!ifies .o.n wntt.e.n request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan c11eCK and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ,Jmhis project is located within the limits of the District's Iv~uR.P,,I ~'/'~ ~/~K./7'~./~/~C./.J/...~ Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be~aid to the Hood (.;ontrol DistricI or City pnor to final approval of the project, or in the case of a_parcel map or subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of recordation, or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a perrail or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wntten correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. _KK . Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Enclineer RESOLUTION NO. 9% A RF~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (I)EV!~JOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 20~619 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.54 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-110--003 WHEREAS, Ted Zonos fded Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96- 0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA96- 0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997, to February 24, 1997; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96- 0293 (Development Plan) on February 24, 1997 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan); WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan - Appeal) was fried on March 7, 1997; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) on April 22, 1997, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA96-0293; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and 132 Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA96-0293; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. findings; to wit: Findings. That the Temeeula City Council hereby makes the following A. The proposed development fails to comply with the requirements of Section 17.08.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code in that the project fails to provide variety and visual image while still creating a unified overall image, in thru the project: (1) fails to use sufficient creative entry treatments with such features as canopies, awnings, or atriums; (2) fails to use sufficient variety of complimentary colors and fails to avoid thru use of just one color and dark colors; (3) fails to use a sufficient variety of window shapes on sizes; (4) fails to sufficiently vary the building shapes by using curved or angled walks; (5) fails to sufficiently reduce the apparent scale of the building and provide visual interest in the building; (6) fails to sufficiently minimize detrimental impacts on surrounding properties due to inadequate screening and design of circulation areas, loading areas and trash collection B. The proposed development is detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare for the reasons set forth in this section. C. The proposed development is inconsistent with the general plan, specifically thru land use element, for the reasons set forth in this section. Section 2. Conditions, That the City of Temecula City Council hereby denies Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan to design and construct a 20,619 square foot commercial development on a parcel containing 2.54 acres located on the southwest comer of Margarita Road and Pauba Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 945-110-003 for the reasons set forth in Section 1 hereof. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. 132 PASSED, APPROVI~.r~ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of April, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor A~I~c. ST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEA~] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) $$ I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-~ was duly and regnlarly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22rid day of April, 1997 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk 132 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 APPEAL MEMORANDUM R:~'TA~='FRPT~93PA96.CCI 4/14/9'7 k~ 20 CI'FY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director FROM: Ron Roberts, Mayor Pro Tem DATE: April 14, 1997 SUBJECT: Pauba & Margarita Strip Mall Project This confirms our telephone conversation of March 7, 1997 when I informed you I was appealing the decision of the Planning Commission on the Pauba and Margarita Strip Mall Project (PA96-0293) to the City Council as of that date. My appeal is based on the following concerns: A major concern is the design of the project. Is it appropriate for the site? The City has new design guidelines providing for better architecture and design of projects. An architect speaking before the Planning Commission criticized the architecture and design of the project. The project is located on a unique site on the ridge line and the architecture should be carefully reviewed. The ingress and egress for the project is also a concern. Is it adequate given the location of the project at the intersection of two significant streets, the topography of the area, and its proximity to parks, the high school and residential areas? Is the project compatible with the adjoining residential areas. This concern involves many of the little issues of a project, such as trash enclosures, odor controls, noise generators, and loitering, which can make a project that is compatible with its neighbors in a commercial area incompatible with its neighbors in a residential neighborhood. There is a great deal of public controversy and concern surrounding this project. At the direction of the Council, I have met with the representatives of the developer and the residents in the area in an effort to work out their differences and I have met with each representative separately in order to get the discussions started again. Another hearing is needed to allow all parties an adequate opportunity to present their views and concerns on the project and to give the developer another opportunity to address these concerns. I have not made a r :~coun c~l~ron9 7~t hornhill.mere Gary Thornhill April 14, 1997 Page 2 decision one way or the other on whether the project should be approved or disapproved or what type of conditions should be imposed if it is approved. I do believe it is a project which involves some difficult land use issues and public controversy and should therefore be fully reviewed and debated by the City Council. Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tern cc: Matthew Fagen r :~.council~rotl9 7~th ornhill .mern ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 27, 1997 R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.CC1 4114197 klb 21 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 27, 1996 Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; ADOPT Resolution No. 97- approving Planning Application No. PA96-0293 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Ted Zonos REPRESENTATIVE: Markham & Associates PROPOSAL: The design and construction of 19,729 square feet of commercial development, associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements LOCATION: The southwest corner of Margarita and Pauba Roads EXISTING ZONING: Neighborhood Commercial SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Public/Institutional Facilities L (Low Density Residential) SP (Specific Plan - Paloma del Sol) NC (Neighborhood Commercial) and L (Low Density Residential) PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: NC (Neighborhood Commercial) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant R:~STAI~FR.FT~93PA95.1~C1 1/22/9'7 klb 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Rancho California Sports Park Single-Family Residences Single-Family Residences Vacant/Single-family Residences PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area: Total Site Area: Building Area: Landscape Area: Parking/Paved Area: Other Hardscape: Parking Required: Parking Provided: Building Height: Tower Element Height: 2.54 acres (net) 19,729 square feet (18%) 42,228 square feet (38%) 41,508 square feet (37%) 7,339 square feet (7%) Sixty-six (66) spaces Eighty-five (85) spaces Twenty-one (21) feet Thirty-five (35) feet) BACKGROUND The project was submitted to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department on October 22, 1996. A Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting was held on November 14, 1996. A letter was mailed to the applicant (dated November 18, 1996) recapitulating the issues raised at the DRC meeting. The applicant re-submitted revise( elevations, landscape plan and elevations on December 10, 1996. The project was deemed complete on January 2, 1997. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a proposal for the design and construction of 19,729 square feet of commercial development, associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements on 2.54 acres (net). ANALYSIS Previous Project A project was previously approved on the site where the current project is proposed. The original project on the site (Plot Plan No. 226) was approved by the Planning Commission in July, 1991 for a period of two (2) years for three (3) buildings totaling 27,000 square feet. Three subsequent one (1) year extensions of time were approved for the project. Since "substantial construction" had not commenced on the project, it expired on August 5, 1996. Public Ol~l~osition for Previous Project As more people purchased property adjacent to the site, public opposition increased. When this project was heard in July of 1991, only one member of the public spoke in opposition of th~ project. At the August 5, 1991 hearing and the September 20, 1993 extension of time hearing, no one spoke in opposition to the project. However, at the September 15, 1994 Director's Hearing five people spoke in opposition. The matter was deferred to the Planning R:\STAFFP..P'I~93PA96.PC1 1/22/97 klb 2 Commission, and at the November 7, 1994 Commission meeting, nine people spoke in opposition. Residents were opposed to uses which served alcohol or would be a detriment to the existing residential development, the park site and schools in proximity to the project. This project has also been the topic of City Council discussion. Current Project/Site Design The current project is a proposal for the design and construction of 19,729 square feet of commercial development, associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements on 2.54 acres (net). The amount of square footage of the development has been decreased from 26,920 square feet proposed with the original project for the site. Originally three (3) building were proposed on the site (Buildings A, B & C). Building C, the southernmost building, has been omitted from the current site design. The project will take access from both Pauba and Margarita Roads. Parking will be in the front of the building. Eighty-five (85) parking spaces have been provided; however, the Development Code only requires sixty-six (66) parking spaces. The applicant states: "given the length between the two access points to the site and the frontage of the buildings along Margarita Road between the corner and the entry the geometry resulted in the current number of spaces." A twenty-six foot (26') wide access road has been provided at the rear of the site. A delivery/loading space has also been provided at the rear of the site. Accent paving/stamped concrete will be used at the driveways, on the walkways crossing the parking lot and in front of the stores. CorresDondence Staff received a transmittal from the Temecula Valley Unified School District dated November 6, 1996 (reference Attachement No. 4). The letter states: "The District has no objections other than to businesses proposing the sale of alcohol, or to businesses whose nature is otherwise incompatible with an educational setting." Landscaping Thirty-eight percent (38%) of the site has been landscaped. The Development Code requires a minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) landscaped open space. Slopes to the west and south of the project have been landscaped with trees and ground cover. The perimeter of the site, along Pauba and Margarita Roads, has been landscaped with turf, groundcover, shrubs and a mixture of tree types. California Fan Palms have been used for accent at the corner, as well as at the southern entry to the site. An upright vertical tree (Tristania Conferta) has been used on the west side (rear) of the building to help break up the massing. Architecture The building is one story, stucco with a clay tile roof. Three tower elements are included in the design, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). Stucco colors are "ivory" and "Eggshell." "Blue Spruce" will be used as the accent color for the trellis, awning and accent tiles. "Mayan Brick" will be used as an accent color for the storefronts. Column features have been included on all four elevations, with tan stone being used at the base of the columns. A R:\STAFFRPTE293PA96.PCI 1/22/9"/k.lb 3 variety of rosettes, with designs made up using tiles, have been included on all four sides o the building to further break up the massing and add interest to the facade. The rear of the building has been well articulated and continues the use of the elements (except glass) used on the other elevations. Al~l;;)roval of Future Uses/Alcohol Sales Once the commercial center is built, uses which could lease space in the center would be subject to the City's Development Code. Some uses which would allow the sale of alcohol · would require a conditional use permit. According to the Approval Authority ion the Development Code, Conditional Use Permit applications which are to be located in an existing building are to be considered at a Planning Director's hearing. In addition, Alcohol Beverage Control Board (ABC) has separation distances criteria between alcohol sales and conflicting land uses. All sales are licensed and are generally prohibited within 600' of a school, hospital, park, or church pursuant to Section 23789 of the California Business and Profession Code. Per ABC, alcohol sales within 500' ~ be grounds to deny a license, but is not automatic. Allowable exceptions include sit down restaurants, when they are considered a bona fide eating place, as defined by Section 23038 of the California Business and Profession Code. Further, the City of Temecula Planning Commission must make a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for many uses that propose the sale of alcohol. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is NC (Neighborhood Commercial). Existinc~ zoning for the site is NC (Neighborhood Commercial). A variety of commercial uses are permitted with the approval of a development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as proposed is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project is a proposal for the design and construction of 19,729 square feet of commercial development, associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements on 2.54 acres (net). The project will take access from Pauba Road and Margarita Road. Parking will be in the front of the building. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of the site has been landscaped. The Development Code requires a minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) landscaped open space. The building is one story, stucco with a clay tile roof. Three tower elements are included in the design, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). R:\STAFFRFI~93PA96.PCI 1/22/97 It. lb 4 The project as proposed is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated. A project was previously approved on the site where the current project is proposed. The original project on the site (Plot Plan No. 226) was approved by the Planning Commission in July, 1991 for a period of two (2) years. Three subsequent one (1) year extensions of time were approved for the project. Since 'substantial construction" had not commenced on the project, it expired on August 5, 1996. FINDINGS ¸1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Attachments: 3. 4. 5. PC Resolution - Blue Page 6 A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9 Initial Study - Blue Page 20 Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 39 Letter from Temecula Valley Unified School District - Blue Page 47 Exhibits - Blue Page 48 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map D. Site Plan E. Landscape Plan F. Elevations R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.PCI 1/22/9'] Idb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:~'TAFFRPT~.93PA96.1~CI 1/22797 idb 6 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 PC RF~OLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ~ APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVFJ~OPlV!~NT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 19,729 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.54 ACRES LOCATED ON TIlE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARC£L NO. 945-110-003 WHEREAS, Ted Zonos filed Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WltEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desixing to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan); NOW, THEREFORE, THF~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) makes the following findings; to wit: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets R: ~STAFFRPT~93PA96 .PC 1 1/'22/9'7 the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health. safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmenta! Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore. is hereby granted. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) to design and construct a 19,729 square foot commercial development on a parcel containing 2.54 acres, located on the southwest comer of Margarita Road and Pauba Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 945-110-003 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 1997. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of January, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Llbnoske, Secretary R: \STAFFRIfle93 PA96 .PC 1 1/22/97 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL l~:~STANNI/l~93PA96.PCl 1//2J97 ]db 9 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA96-0293 {Development Plan) Project Description: The design and construction of 19,729 square foot commercial development on 2.54 acres Assessor'a Parcel No.: 945-110-003 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight {48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. o This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two {2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. R:~TAFFRPT~293PA96.PCI 1/22/97 klb 10 The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D, a; approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0293, or as amended by these conditions. a. Nine (9) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided. b. A minimum of sixty-six (66)) parking spaces shall be provided. c. Four (4) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit E, or as amended by these conditions. Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit F (Elevations) and Exhibit G (Color Elevations), or as amended by these conditions. Envelopes for wall-mounted signage are conceptual only. Businesses may have one (1) wall mounted sign located over their suite in accordance with the City's current sign ordinance. Maximum area for the sign shall also be in accordance with the City's sign ordinance in effect at the time of permit issuance. Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H (color and material board), or as amended by these conditions. Materials Color; Tile (roof) Concrete (entry paving) Concrete (sidewalk paving) Cost Stone (column base) Stucco (building) Stucco (building) Glass (windows) Wood (trellises) Metal (mullions) Tiles (rosettes) Stone (cornice) Monier Mission Tile "16682" Chromix Admixture C-22 "Coral Red" Chromix Admixture "Summer Beige" Dura Art Stone S-4 "Tan" La Habra Stucco X-73 "Eggshell" La Habra Stucco X-73 "Pure Ivory" Clear Frazee #4925A" Blue Spruce" Frazee #6265R "Mayan Brick" DaI-Tile Dura Art Stone S-3 "White" o Directional signs, the monument sign and accent paving shall conform substantially with Exhibit I, or as amended by these conditions. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation). 10. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for thi., stage of the development. R:\STAFFRPTL293PA96.PCI 1/22/97 kJb 1 1 Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid. 12. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 13. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. 14. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager. 16. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view. 17. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 18. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 19. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.PC1 1/22/9"/k,lb 1 2 In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 20. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 21. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 22. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 23. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 24. Submit at time of plan review, complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 25. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to the commencement of any construction work. 26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 27. All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1994). 28. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 29. Show path of accessibility from the parking to the furthest point of improvement. 30. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 31. Provide fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. 32. Provide an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. R:\STAFFRPT~293PA96.PC1 1/22/97 Idb 1 3 34. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for panel review. 35. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of recoed, the truss maufacturers engnieer, and that have been plan checked and stamped by the plan check agency and the City are required before sheet and shear inspection. 36. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. General Requirements 37. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all onsite fiat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 39. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 40. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 41. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. R:~TAFFRPT~93PA96.1~Cl 1/22/F7 klb 14 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California California Department of Fish and Game Army Corps of Engineers Planning Department Department of Public Works A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide for underground drainage facilities to collect and convey the runoff from this site to the existing underground downstream drainage facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing o; downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. A drainage easement shall be provided for construction and maintenance of the drainage structure outlet. The drainage easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. Graded but undeveloped land shall be stabilized from erosion to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. R:\STAFFRPT'O.93PA96.PC1 1/22/97 idb 1 5 51. An Area Drainage Plan fee shall be paid to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. 52. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. 53. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by the Riverside Transit Authority. 54. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 55. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. An Encroachment Permit will be required for any work performed within the City right-of-way. The following design criteria shall be observed: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard. eo Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. fo All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. R:~'TAFFR.PT~93PA96.PC! 1/'22/97 Idb 1 6 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveye¢ through undersidewalk drains. The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. ao Improve Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards- 110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. Improve Pauba Road (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transitions to existing street sections. A Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, and approved by the Department of Public Works. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approve0 by the Department of Public Works for Margarita Road and Pauba Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. The Developer shall obtain an easement for the driveway located on Pauba Road for ingress and egress over the adjacent property between parcels 3 and 4. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. R:\STAFFRPT~293?A96.PC1 1/22/9'7 Idb 1 7 64. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; I;)rovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 65. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works 66. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 67. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 68. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 69. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES 70. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Fire Department's transmittal dated January 21, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 71. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 4, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 72. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. R:~-'TAFFR--°T~9~PA96.PCI I~Z2/F'/klb 1 8 73. 74. 75. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County o! Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 5, 1996, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's transmittal dated November 8, 1 996, a copy of which is attached. R:\STAFFR.PT~293PA96.PCl 1/22197 Idb 19 City of Temecula 43200 Burness P~k Drive · Temeo~, GA 92590 · M~,l~n~,~r~' P O Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 92589-9033 [909) 694-6444 · F~ [909J 694-1999 January 21, 1997 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MATTHEW FAGAN RE: PA96-0293 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The fir~ Depm'tment i~ required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial building using the procedures established in Ordinance 546. A fire flow of 1750 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6'x4'x2-2 1/1'), will be located no less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along appwved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire DeparUnent for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a plan check fee of $582.00 to the City of Temecula. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to install a fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buildings/suites. If building/suite requires Hazardous Material Reporting (Material Safety Data Sheets) the Knox HAZ MAT Data and key storage cabinets shall be installed. If building/suites are protected by a fire or burglar alarm system, the boxes will require "Tamper" monitoring. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. All exit doors shall be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. h is prohibited to use/process or store any materials in this occupancy that would classify it as an "H" occupancy per Chapter 9 of the Uniform Building Code. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 12 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to the issuance of building permits the developer shall pay to the City of Temecula, the sum of $.25 per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. Please contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All quedions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section (909)694-6439. Brian Hampton Fire Safety Specialist M~chael ~.. McMillan Ralph H. Daily DOU~ Kulberg ,leff~rv L, Mink~er ,lohn ¥ Henmear Phillip l.. Fnrbes F P "!-{oh I.em~ns Kenneth C. Deuly Perry R. Louck I.mda N1 C. Michael Best. Best & ~te~er November 4, 1996 Mr. Craig Ruiz, Assistant Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8455 APN 945-110-003 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 96-0293 Dear Mr. Ruiz: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho Califomia Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 96/SB:mc208/F012/FEF c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Eastern ] unicipalW,..er District Craig Ruiz City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 [ ~--,.U'I.) November 8, 1996 1996 By SUBJECT: PA96-0293 (Parcel 4, PM 8455) - Agency Case Transmittal Dear Mr. Ruiz: We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: GENERAL Our understanding is the subject project is to develop 2.76 acres on Parcel 4 of PM 8455 (APN 945-110-003) into a retail commercial center. The subject project site is located on the southwesterly corner of Pauba and Margarita Roads. The project includes a 3,113 square foot Building A and the 16,616 square foot Building B. EMWD reviewed PA96-0119 in July of 1996 for this same parcel of land. The previous project is similar to the proposed subject project except phasing of the building construction is not planned. EM%;D comments are similar to those for the previous project and are reiterated below. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. The available service capabilities of the District's systems are constantly changing. Hence, service to the subject project is dependent upon the available capacity of the District's systems at the time service agreements are made with EMWD. DOMESTIC WATER The project is outside of EMWD's water service area. Potable water must be arranged with the Rancho California Water District. Mail to: Post Office Box 8300 · San Jacinto. California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto * Customer Service / Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue. Hernet, CA Operations & Maintenance Center: 2270/'rumble Road. Pettis, CA 92571 * Telephone (909) 928-3777 * Fax (909) 928-6177 Craig Ruiz PA 96-0293 Page 2 SANITARY SEWER The subject project is tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. For service from EMWD, an 8- inch gravity sanitary sewer must be extended in Margarita Road, 650 feet southerly from Rancho Vista, to the project site. Construction drawings for such a sewer main have been approved by EMWD (SD-14741 to 14743). However, these drawings must be updated to conform to current EMWD standards. Before construction can begin, the revisions and a Waste Discharge Application must be completed by the Developer and approved by EMWD. RECLAIMED WATER The project is outside of the EMWD's water service area. Reclaimed water must be arranged with the Rancho California Water District. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Additions or improvements to off-site facilities are required to adequately serve the subject project. This letter serves as the Plan-of-Service for the subject project. The project is being processed through the Customer Service Department for completion of the plan check process. Tracking of the subject project is being coordinated through the "One-Stop" program by Ms. Judy Conacher at (909)766-1810, ext. 4409. Thank you for soliciting our concerns. If you have any questions regarding the above matter, please call me at (909) 766-1810. Sincerely, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Mike Gow Civil Engineer Customer Service Department cc: Judy Conacher, Development Coordinator - EMWD Karl Roland, Project Engineer - EMWD TO: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DATE: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: Craig Ruiz FROhi t~ Gt~E6OR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV By RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA96-0293 - Formerly PP 226 - Now Expired November 5, 1996 Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA96-0293 and has no objections. 2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE · a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (358-5055) will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: · Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. · Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. · Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2). · Waste reduction management. GD:dr (909) 285-8980 cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials Branch November 8, 1996 1996 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517 Phone: (909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) 684-1007 Mr. Craig Ruiz Temecu!a Planning I')_epa..,'tm.=.nt 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RE: PA96-0293 Dear Mr. Ruiz: Currently our Route #23 travels S.W. along Pauba Road and N.W. along Margarita Road. We do not provide service on Margarita Road past Pauba Road; however, based upon our plans for future growth, we are requesting a bus turnout be incorporated into the general design. An ideal site for the bus turnout would be on Margarita Road near Building "B" between the HC Path-of-Travel and the driveway, where the sidewalk is adjacent to the curb. I can indicate the exact location for the bus turnout as the project progresses. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Should you require additional information or specifications, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, M. Anne Newvine Transit Planner MAN:cam cc: Planning Files DAVID P. ZAPPE ,~.~~~.~ 19~ MARKET STREET - ~ 90g/788-o065 I:A X RIVERSIDE COUNTY FI,()OD CONTRO City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive . By -- Temecula, California 92590 .... Attention: (". R R I ~ f)X. U ! 7.... Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PtI~i ? & -' O 2. ~ 3 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. Distdct comment~recom _menclarions for such cases are normally limited to ite,ms o! specific interest to the District including Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood contro~ ano drainage facilities which could be considered a logical .c,ompone,n:,t: or extensi_o~ of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees {development mitigation feesr In addi,ion, in[orrns,ion of a general nature is provided. The Distdct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project w~th respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: b,~"~This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The Distdct will accept ownership of such facilities on wntten request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such faci!ities ,o.n wntt.en request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan cheCK an(3 inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ,JThis project is located within the limits of the Distdcrs ~/~UR.R,I ~;'/'/:t C,~g~.,K./7'~Jv/~C.J~/...~ Area. Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees shoul.d be/l~aid to the Hood Con .m3~ Distric[or City pnor to final approval of the project, or in the case of a_parcel map or subdivision prior recordation of the final map. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of recordation, or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit ~om the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergen.cy Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant. to. obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. ._q . Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer ATTACHMENT NO. 2 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY og T mmC'Ut Environmental Checklist Project Title: Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact P~rson and Phone Number: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 6. General Plan Designation: 7. Zoning: 8. Description of Project: 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Other public agencies whose approval is required: Planning Apphcation No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400 Southwest comer of Margarita Road and Pauba Road Ted Zonos 9041 Lubec Street Downey, CA 90240 NC (Neighborhood Commercial) NC (Neighborhood Commercial) The project consism of the design and construction of 19,729 SClUam feet of commercial development, associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements on 2.54 acres. A vacant portion of the Rancho California Sports Park to the ncgth, residences and a church to the west, residences to the south, vacant and residences to the east. Riverside County Fire Deparunent, Riverside County Health Department, Temecula Police DeparUnent, Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho California Water District, Southern California Gas Company, Southern California Edison Company, General Telephone Company, and Riverside Transit Agency. R:\STAFFR. PT~93PA96.PCI 1/22/97 klb 21 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project. involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated bv the checklist on the following pages. [X] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards [ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise [X] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services [X] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Air QualiB' [X] Aesthetics [ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation [ ] Ener~, and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandato~' Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the emsronment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signature Date Printed Name R:\STAFFRPT\293PA96.PC1 1/22/97 klb 22 ISSUES AND SLIPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES No 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a.Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17) b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-16) e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established commumty (including low-income or minority commuaity)? 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? b. Induce subsumtial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infi'asWactur~)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the propos'm result in or expose people to potenti-m impacts iavolviag: a. Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page %5) b. Seismic ground shaking? c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (Source 1, Figure %2, Page 7-g) d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e. Landslides or mudflows? f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grading or fill? g. Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure %2, Page %8) h. Expansive soils? I. Uniqu~ geologic or physical features? [] [1 IX] [] [] [] [] [] [] [x] [] [] [] [x] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] IX] [] IX3 [] [] [l [] IX3 [] [x] R:\STAFFRPT~93PA96.PC1 1/'22/97 klb 23 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Polentially Significant Impact Po~ntially Significant Unlma Mitigation Incorporated Significant No 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount of surface runofl~. b. Exposure of people or property. to water related hazards such as flooding? (Source 1, Figure 7-3, Page 7-10) c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water qualit3' (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d. Changes m the mount of surface water m any water body? e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer bv cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h. Impacts to groundwater quality? I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality. violation? b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause an>' change in climate? d. Create objectionable odors? 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous totersection or incompatible uses)? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 {] [1 [] [] [x] [] IX] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] ix] IX] IX] [x] ix] [] [1 [] {1 IX] {x] [] [] [xi [] [] [] [] [1 [] ix] Ix] [x] IX] [] [] IX] R::STAFFRFI~93PA96.PC'I 1/22/97 klb 24 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING IN'FORMATION SOURCES Potentially Pol~mlially No c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicychsts? f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g Rail, waterborne or air traffic impa~ts? 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered, threa~med or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? c. Locally designated natural eommumties (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d. Weftand habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e. Wildlife dispersal or migration coredors? 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? b.Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] (] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [3 [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 IX] [] R:kSTAFFRPT~93PA96.PCi 1/22/ty7 klb 25 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Po~ntially Signilia:am No d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the propos,,! h..ve ~n effect upon, or result in .. ne~d for u~w or altered government service., in ~ny of the following ,.re,,,: a. Fire protection? b. Pohce protection? c. Schools? d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e. Other governmental services? 12. UTII JTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in ~, n~ed for new sy~tem~ or supplies, or .~ub.~t*ntial alterations to the following uffiities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Commumcations systems? c. Local or regional water trealment or dislribution facilities? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste disposal? g. Local or regional water supplies? 13. AESTHETICS. Would the propo,al: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? [] [] [] [x'] [] [] [] IX] [1 [] [x] [l [] [] IX] [1 [] [] ~] [1 [] [] Ix] [1 [] [] ~] [] [] [] ~] [] [] [] [] IX] [] [] [1 IX] [] [] [] pc] [] [1 [3 IX] [] [1 [3 [~ [1 [1 IX] [1 [] [] [] lx'] [1 [3 [1 [~ [] [1 [] pc] [] [] [~ [l R:~STAFFRPT~293PAg$.IaCI 1/22/~7 kJb 26 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION gOURCES Potinitially Significant Po~mially Sjg,~;~cant Unless Mitigation No 14. 15. c. Create light or ~arc? CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1, Figure 5.6, Page 5-21) c. Affect historical resources? (Source 1, Figure 5-6, Page 5-21) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Source 1, Figure 5-6, Page 5-21) e. Restrict existing rehgious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal commlality, redu~ the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califorma history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental etfects of a project are considerable when viewed m connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse e~ffects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Pq [] [] [] [] IX1 IX] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [3 [l R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.PCI 1F22/97 klb 27 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None. SOURCES City o£Tcm~ula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. R:'~STAFFRPT~93PA96.PC1 1/22197 klb 28 DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS and Use and Planning 1.b. The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Designation of NC (Neighborhood Commercial). Impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report for (EIR) the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project. Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are also being given the opportunity to comment on the project and it is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans or polices. The site has been previously graded and services are within proximity of the project. There will be limited, if any environmental effects on environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. The project may have a potentially significant impact (unless mitigation is incorporated) from compatibility with existing land uses in the vicinity. A project was previously approved on the site in 1991, with subsequent extensions of time approved in 1993, 1994 and 1995. As residential development increased around the project site, many residents voiced concerns regarding compatibility of that project with the surrounding development at the 1994 extension of time for the project. The project in 1991 was approved for 26,920 square feet of commercial development on the site. The size of the current proposal has been reduced to 19,729 square feet of commercial development on the same amount of area, thereby mitigating some concerns regrading the scale of the project at that site. The General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning Designation for the site is NC (Neighborhood Commercial). According to the General Plan, neighborhood commercial centers are intended to u...provide retail or convenience services for the local residences in the surrounding neighborhood." This project meets the intent of the General Plan in this regard. Landscaping has been included on the southern and western slopes to provide further mitigate impacts to adjacent residences. A letter was received from the Temecula Valley Unified School District (dated November 6, 1996) stating: UThe District has no objections other than businesses proposing sale of alcohol, or to businesses whose nature is otherwise incompatible with an educational setting." Once the development is built, the uses which occupy the structure would be subject to the City's Development Code. Many uses which would allow the sale of alcohol would require a conditional use permit. In addition, Alcohol Beverage Control Board (ABC) has separation distances criteria between alcohol sales and conflicting land uses. All sales are licensed and are generally prohibited within 600' of a school, hospital, park, or church pursuant to Section 23789 of the California Business and Profession Code. Per ABC, alcohol sales within 500' ~ be grounds to deny a license, but is not automatic. Allowable exceptions include sit down restaurants, when they are considered a bona fide eating place, as defined by R:\STA. I:Zl~RPT~93PA96.PC! 1/22/~7 k~b 29 Section 23038 of the California Business and Profession Code. Further, the City of Temecula Planning Commission must make a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for many uses that propose the sale of alcohol. By following the procedures discussed above, impacts from uses serving alcohol can be addressed within the extent of applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will have a less than significant impact in terms of disrupting or dividing the physical arrangement of an established community (including low- income or minority community). While there has been previous opposition to a previously proposed, larger project, at this site, the project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations. These designations were established though both the General Plan Program and Development Code process to insure the logical and orderly development of the City. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. Population and Housing The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The project is a commercial project which is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Designation of NC (Neighborhood Commercial). Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, and does not exceed the floor area ratio for Neighborhood Commercial, it will not be a significant contributor to population growth which will cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. 2.5. The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Neighborhood Commercial. The project may cause people to relocate to or within Temecula; however, due to its limited scale, it will not induce substantial growth in the area. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. .Co The project will not displace housing, especially affordable housing. site is vacant; therefore no housing will be displaced. No significant anticipated as a result of this project. The project effects are Geologic Problems 3.b,h. The project will have a potentially significant impact (unless mitigation is incorporated) on people involving seismic ground shaking and expansive soils. The project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. Further, preliminary soil reports have been submitted and reviewed as part of the application submittal and recommendations contained in this report will be used to determine appropriate conditions of approval. The soils reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking and expansive soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\STAFFRPT'c293PA96.PC! 1t22/97 klb 30 3.d. The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The project is not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. oe. The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental Impact for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3of. The project will have a potentially significant impact (unless mitigation is incorporated) from erosion, changes in topography, grading or fill. The site has been previously graded and the project does propose grading beyond that which has already occurred. Increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off- site may occur during the construction phase of the project and the project may result in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the project. In the long-run, hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion control for the project. Since the amount of grading will be the minimum necessary for the realization of the project, modification to topography and ground surface relief features will not be considered significant. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper compaction of the soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.i. The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. No unique geologic features or physical features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. .a o The project will result in potentially significant (unless mitigation is incorporated) changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff; however, these changes are considered less than significant. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff which is created. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will .be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 4.d,e. The project will have a less than significant impact in changes in the amount of surface water in any waterbody or impact to water currents, or to the course or R:~STAFFRPT~93PA96.PC! 1/22/9/klb ~ 1 4.f-h. 4.i. Air (luality 5.a. 5.b. S,d. direction of water movements. Additional surface runoff will occur because previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, the additional amount of drainage will not considered significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will have a less than significant change in the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Limited changes will occur in the quantity and quality of ground waters; however, due to the minor scale of the project, it will not be considered significant. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies. According to information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan, "Rancho California Water District indicate that they can accommodate additional water demands." Water service currently exists in the immediate proximity to the project. Water service will need to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD). This is typically provided upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. The project is below the threshold for potentially significant air quality impact (22,000 square feet) established by South Coast Air Quality Management District (Page 6-11, Table 6-2 of the South Coast Air Quality Management CEQA Air Quality Handbook). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant pollutants in the immediate proximity to the project and it is not anticipated that this type of project would generate pollutants which would be harmful to sensitive receptors. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate. The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on the environment in this area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will create objectional odors during the construction phase of the project. These impacts-will be of short duration and are not considered significant. R:\STAFFR.PT~.93PA96.PC1 1/22/9'7 klb 32 Transportation/Circulation The project will result in a less than significant increase in vehicle trips; however it will add to traffic congestion. It is anticipated that this project will contribute less than a five percent (5%) increase in existing volumes during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour time frames to the intersection of Margarita Road and Pauba Road. Presently, the intersection of Pauba and Margarita Roads operate at a Level of Service A (LOS A) or the lowest level of impact. LOS categories range from LOS A (free-flow condition with no congestion) to LOS F (gridlock condition with severe congestion). When Pauba and Margarita Roads are constructed to their ultimate widths (88 feet and 110 feet respectively), the roads will continue to operate at a LOS A. As for the construction of improvements in this area, this project will be required by the conditions of approval to construct half-width improvements for both Pauba and Margarita Roads adjacent to the boundaries of this site. The conditions of approval also require the project to pay signal mitigation fees and development impact fees. Pauba Road west of Margarita Road was designated a Capital Improvement Plan road widening project and has been completed. After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6,b. The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards to safety from design features. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses. The project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access. The project does not provide direct access to nearby uses; therefore, it will not impact access to nearby uses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6.d. The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. Sufficient on-site parking spaces shall be provided. Off-site parking will not be impacted. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will result in a less than significant impact from hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists. Increased activity at this intersection will logically increase hazards or barriers to pedestrians or bicyclists. Because the project is designed to current City standards, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6.f. The project will not result in conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. The project was transmitted to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). In their transmittal (dated November 8, 1996) they have requested a bus turnout be provided on Margarita Road. A condition of approval will be included for this project requiring compliance with this transmittal. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:~STAFFRPT~93pA~.PCI I/Z~/~7 klb 33 S.g. The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none exists currently in the immediate proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Biological Resources ,8, The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project site has been previously graded. Currently, there are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist at this location. The project will not reduce the number of species, provide a barrier to the migration of animals or deteriorate existing habitat. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts to the species. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.5. The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated species are protected in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are none located anywhere else in the City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, and since there are no locally designated species on site, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. .Co The project will not result in an impact to locally designated natural communities. Reference response 7.b. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.d. The project will not result in an impact to wetland habitat. There is no wetland habitat on-site or within proximity to the site that would be affected by this project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. ,8. The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site does not serve as part of a migration corridor. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Energy and Mineral Resources oa, 8.b, The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non- renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources, due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant. R:~STAFFRP'D293PA96.PCI 1/22/9'7 klb 34 .C, The project will not result in the loss of availabilitY, of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Hazards oa. The project will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the request. The same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials. Typically, large quantities of these types of substances are not associated with uses permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning Designation. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the project and the applicant must receive their clearance prior to any plan check submittal. This applies to storage and use of hazardous materials. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 9.b. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response plan. The project will take access from two maintained streets and will therefore not impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 9.1d. The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush, grass, or trees. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Noise 10.a. The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. Long-term noise generated would be generated from automobiles, trucks, pedestrians using the site and ancillary equipment (i.e., air conditioners) used by the tenants of the building. Because the site is separated from immediate residential development, no significant noise impacts are anticipated as a result of this project in either the short or long-term. 10.b. The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase (short run). Construction machinery is capable R:\STAFFRPT~93PA96.PCI 1/22/9'7 k~ 35 of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. There will be no long-term exposure of people to noise. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Public Services 11.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision from these entities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 11.c. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. School Mitigation fees will be collected prior to the issuance of a building permit for this project to mitigate any incremental impacts associated with this project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 11.d. The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be incremental, however, they will not be considered significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses. 11.e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Utilities and Service Systems 12.a. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.b. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.c. 12.d. The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact 1/22/9'7 klb 36 Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. There are no septic tanks on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.e. The proposal will result in a less than significant need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to storm water drainage. The project will need to provide some additional on-site drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition of approval for the project and will tie into the existing system. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.f. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.9. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Aesthetics 13.a. The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in a area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated scenic highways. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.b. The project may have a potentially significant negative aesthetic effect. The project is a commercial use located at the intersection of two General Plan Circulation Element roadways. The site is highly visibly from all sides. While the building is of high quality design and includes landscaping which provides some aesthetic enhancement, it will be the only commercial establishment in the immediate area. As discussed in 1.c. above, this may present a compatibility issue with the surrounding development. Mitigation measure to include enhanced building articulation and landscaping have been included in the project design. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.c. The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project will produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. The project will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Cultural Resources R:\STAF~93PA96.PCI 1/22/97 klb 37 14.a. 14.d. 14.e. Recreation 15.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact'on paleontological resources. The site is identified being located in a high sensitivity area for paleontological resources. The immediate site, plus areas adjacent to the site have been disturbed from prior grading activity and the resources may have been disturbed. This reduces the probability for paleontological resources to be on the project site. A condition of approval will be included for the project which requires a qualified paleontologist be chosen by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological/archaeological impacts. If necessary, during the grading process, the paleontologist shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. Reference response 14.a,c. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula. However, it may result in an incremental impact or in an increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. The same is true for the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:'~STAFFRPT~93PA96.PCI 1/22/~7 klb 38 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ~ ~.STAFFRPT~3PA~6 .PC1 1/22/~7 ~ 39 l.nnd Use General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Mitigation Monitoring Program Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) Incompatibility with existing land uses in the vicinity. Reduce the scale of the project from the previously approved project and provide enhanced landscaping on the southern and western perimeter. Submit building conswuction plans for the commercial development which are consistent with the approved site plan (approximately 19,729 square feet in size) and submit landscape plans which are consistent with the approved site plan (with enhanced landscaping on the southern and western perimeter of the project) for review and approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Planning Depmiment and Building and Safety Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Incompatibility with existing land uses in the vicinity. Project compliance with Section 23789 of the California Business and Professions Code and the City's Developmere Code Require the applicam to acquire the necessary entitlements to sell alcohol on the premises. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Building and Safety Depa~iment. Geologic Problem~ General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking. Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards. A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Depatiment of Public Works with the initial grading plan cheek. Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer. Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department. R:'tST~93PA96.P(21 1/'Z2/97 klb 40 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Processes: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: General Impact: Mifgation Measures: Specific Processes: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking. Utilize consUmcfion techniques that are consistent with the Uniform Building Code. Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety Department for approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Building and Safety Depmtmem. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill. Planting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457. Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Deparunent of Public Works. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Planning Department and Department of Public Works. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill. Planting of on-site hndscaping that is consistent with the Development Code. Submit landscape plans that include planting of slope to the Planning Depaximent for approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Planning Deparunent. R:L.~TAFFR.PT~93PA96.PC1 1/22/97 klb 41 General Impact: Mi 6 gation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Exposure of people seismic ground shaking, sejnmic ground failure, landslides or expansive soils. Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards. A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer. Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building permits. Department of Public Works and Building & Safety Depariment. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure or expansive soils. Utilize construction techniques that are consistera with the Uniform Submit consinaction phns to the Building & Safety Deparunem for approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Building & Safety Depzu'tment General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff. Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively impact adjacent properties, including dralmge conveyances, have been incorporated into site design and will be included on the grading phns. Submit grading and drainage plan to the Depart-lent of Public Works for approval. Prior to the issuance of grading permit. Deparuaent of Public Works. R:~T~93PA96.P~l 1/22/97 kIb 42 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Transl~ortation/Cirodation General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity). An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance with the Natioml Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDE5) requirements. The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Departmere of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP). Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion. Payment of Public Facility Fee for road improvements and ~xaffic impacts. Post bond @ $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000.00 and execute agreemere for paymere of Public Facility Fee. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Department of Public Works. Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion. Paymere of Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee. Pay pro-rata share for traffic impacts (to be determined by the Director of Public Works. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Department of Public Works. R: ~'TAFFRPT~93PA96.PCI 1/22/~7 klb 43 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Riological Resources General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Public Services General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Respomible Monitoring Party: Insufficient paricing capacity on-site or off-site. Provide on-site parking spaces to accommodate the use. Install on-site parking spaces. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Depa~ tmem of Public Works, Planning Depa~uuem and Building & Safety Depa~ tment. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limi~:l to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds). Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat. Pay $500.00 per gross acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Depa~ tment of Public Works and Planning Deparunem A subshantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental services regarding fire protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision. Payment of Fire Mitigation Fees. Pay current mitigation fees with the Riverside County Fire Depa, tment. Prior to the issuance of building permit. Building & Safety Depa~'t~ent R:~TAFFRPT1293PA96.1~l 1/22/97 I~ 44 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools. No significant impacts are anticipated. Payment of School Fees. Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Building & Safety Depa~ iment and Temecula Valley Unified School District. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities, including roads. Paymere of Public Facility Fee for road improvements, traffic impacts, and public facilities. Post bond ~ $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000.00, and execute agreement for payment of Public Facility Fee. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Depa~uuent of Public Works. Aesthetics General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: A potentially significant negative aesthetic effect. Reduce the scale of the project from the previously approved project, provide architecturally high quality development and include enhanced landscaping on the southern and western perimeter. Submit building construction plans for the commercial development which are consistent with the approved site plan (approximately 19,729 square feet in size), submit elevations which are consistent with the approved elevations and submit landscape plans which are consistent with the approved site plan (with enhanced landscaping on the southern and western perimeter of the project) for review and approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Planning Deparlment and Building and Safety Deparunent. R:LSTAFFRFI~93PA96.PCl 1/22/97 kIb 45 Cultural Resources General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Potentially impact paleontological resources. Monitor the grading process. A qualified paleontologist shall monitor the grading process for the recovery of fossils. During the grading of the site. Planning Depa, iment. R:~rAFFRPT~93PA96.PGI 1/'22/97 ir~ 46 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 LETTER FROM TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DATED NOVEMBER 6, 1996 R:~-~T~3PA96.1~C1 1,"~2/97 47 TVUSD FACILITIES 909-695-7335 TEMECULA VALLEY Unified Scbool District NOV ~6 9:30 No.002 P.02 m~r ~TI3~ lam~m Tm~4~ November O, 1996 Craig Ruiz City of Tamecull Plenning Dop4adrmnt 43200 Business Park Ddva Temecula. ~ 92590 SUBJECT: PAH..O21.T, Development Plan, Comer of P&ubm and Marga,;ia Roads Dem' Mr. Ru~ The T~ Valley Unified School Disl~l has con(ams about the polenlial sale of alcohol ~t the proposed telall center a~ Um comer of Pauba and Ma~a~a Roads. Allhough alcnholio sales were m:4 mentioned in the re(ant ~)pll(ation we received, bu~klessas rwopesing the sale of alcohol may c~dor movktO to this new oenter. This location is ac~ss the i~lersectJon from Temacula Valley High School, with a current Idudent population of about 3500 studerds. The Dis~lcl's objection to alcohol sales at this Ioclllion ts (x)nsistent with the Business and Professions Code, which provides for the denial of such II(anse$ within 600 fast o~ a school site, public playground, or nonprofit youth facility. The District has no objections other than 1o businesses proposing the sale o/alcohol. or 1o ~$ whose nature is otherwise im~ompatible with In educational salting. you have any questleas, please call me at 006.-7340. Sincerely, Temecula Valley.l~n~fi,e<l School Disldct i~F~mrdlnator. FGcililies Development cc: Dave Gallaher, Director of Facilities Developmeal 31350 Raftoho V~ Road / Tmnoc3Jia, CA 92502 / (~lG) 676-2~61 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 EXHIBITS R:tST~93PA96.JsCI 1~J2/97 Id~ 4~ CITY OF TEMECULA PROJECT LOCATIO~ PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JANUARY 27,1997 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: NC (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: NC (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JANUARY 27, 1997 IF CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 EXHIBIT D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JANUARY 27, 1997 SITE PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA MARGARITA ROAD PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 EXHIBIT E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JANUARY 27, 1997 LANDSCAPE PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) EXHIBIT F ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JANUARY 27, 1997 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 24, 1997 R:~STA~3PA96,CCI 4/14/97 it.lb 22 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thomhill, Community Development Director~"~' February 24, 1997 Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) - the design and construction of 19,729 square feet of commercial development, associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements located at the southwest comer of Margarita and Pauba Roads Prepared by: RECOMM~NDATION: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: BACKGROUND ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; ADOPT Resolution No. 9% approving Planning Application No. PA96-0293 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. The project was continued at the January 27, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission had concema regarding the aesthetics of the building and site design and overall compatibility of the project. The applicant was directed by the Commission to revisit the design of the project. Staff has met with the applicant on several occasions to discuss issues raised by the Planning Commission and how they could be addressed. As a result of these meetings, the applicant has changed the site design and the design of the elevations. The changes will be presented at the Commission meeting. R:WrAFFRFI~93PA96.PC2 2/18/97 aft 1 Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 3 A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 2/18/97 ~ 2 ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:~ST~pA96.Iq::2 2/18/~7 mf ~3 PC RF_,SOL~ON NO. 97.-004 A RESOLSON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 (DEV~IOPM~.~ PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 19,729 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.54 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCE~L NO. 945-110-003 WHFR£AS, Ted Zonos filed Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; W'i:!EREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WH~AS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) on January 27, 1997, to February 24, 1997; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan); NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNI~G COMMIgSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findirtgs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) makes the following findings; to wit: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions. R:~FAFFRFI~93PA96.PC'2 2/25/97 mf 4 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. l~.nvironmenml C. ompli,nce. An Initial Study pz~-pared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not b~ a significant effect in ~ case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Condi6ons. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Planning Al~p~cafion No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) to design and construct a 19,729 square foot commercial development on a parcel containing 2.54 acres, located on the southwest comer of Margarita Road and Pauha Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 945-110-003 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 5. PASSEl), APPROVED AND AIIO~ this 24th day of February, 1997. I ItEREB¥ CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 24th day of February, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMIVIISSIONERS: None Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:LSTAFFRPT~93PA96.PC'2 2/25/97 mf 5 EXHIBIT A OONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R=~TA.FI~RP'I'~pA~.!~2 2/1~/snf 6 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan) Project Description: The design end construction of 19,729 square foot commercial development on 2.54 acres Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-110-003 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, al~peal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA96-0293 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. R:~-'TAI:rFRPT~93PA96.1N~2 2/18/97 mf 7 The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D, as approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0293, or as amended by these conditions. a. Nine (9) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided. b. A minimum of sixty-six (66)) parking spaces shall be provided. c. Four (4) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. o Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit E, or as amended by these conditions. o Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit F (Elevations) and Exhibit G (Color Elevations), or as amended by these conditions. Envelopes for wall-mounted signage are conceptual only. Businesses may have one (1) wall mounted sign located over their suite in accordance with the City's current sign ordinance. Maximum area for the sign shall also be in accordance with the City's sign ordinance in effect at the time of permit issuance. Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H (color and material board), or as amended by these conditions. Materials Colors Tile (roof) Concrete (entry paving) Concrete (sidewalk paving) Cost Stone (column base) Stucco (building) Stucco (building) Glass (windows) Wood (trellises) Metal (mullions) Tiles (rosettes) Stone (cornice) Monier Mission Tile '16682" Chromix Admixture C-22 'Coral Red" Chromix Admixture 'Summer Beige" Dura Art Stone S-4 'Tan" La Habra Stucco X-73 'Eggshell" La Habra Stucco X-73 'Pure Ivory" Clear Frazee #4925A" Blue Spruce" Frazee 86265R "Mayan Brick" Da!-Tile Dura Art Stone S-3 'White" o Directional signs, the monument sign and accent paving shall conform substantially with Exhibit I, or as amended by these conditions. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation). 10. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid. 12. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 13. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. 14. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager. 16. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view. 17. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 18. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 19. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone R:~TAI~=RFT~)~PA96.PC2 2/Ig/F'/mf ~) In addition to the above recluirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 20. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan. and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 21. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 22. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 23. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 24. Submit at time of plan review, complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 25. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to the commencement of any construction work. 26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 27. All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1994). 28. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 29. Show path of accessibility from the parking to the furthest point of improvement. 30. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 31. Provide fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. 32. Provide an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 34. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for panel review. .35. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record, the truss manufacturers engineer, and that have been plan checked and stamped by the plan check agency and the City are required before sheet and shear inspection. 36. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. it is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. General Requirements 37. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 39. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24' x 36' City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 40. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 41. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. R:~STAFFRI~293PA~.PC2 ~Jl$~ u~ 1 1 42. 43. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Metrol~olitan Water District of Southern California California Department of Fish and Game Army Corps of Engineers Planning Department Department of Public Works A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide for underground drainage facilities to collect and convey the runoff from this site to the existing underground downstream drainage facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. A drainage easement shall be provided for construction and maintenance of the drainage structure outlet. The drainage easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. Graded but undeveloped land shall be stabilized from erosion to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. R.* ~STA ~'FR.FT~93 pA ~ .pC'2 2./18/97 51. An Area Drainage Plan fee shall be paid to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. 52. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section Xi of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. 53. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by the Riverside Transit Authority. 54. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Prior to Issuance of · Building Permit 55. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. An Encroachment Permit will be required for any work performed within the City right-of-way. The following design criteria shall be observed: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. Co Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyeo through undersidewalk drains. The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Improve Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. Improve Pauba Road (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Go All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caitrans standards for transitions to existing street sections. A Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, and approved by the Department of Public Works. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Margarita Road and Pauba Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. The Developer shall obtain an easement for the driveway located on Pauba Road for ingress and egress over the adjacent property between parcels 3 and 4. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. R:~f'AFFR.IrT~93PA96.1sC'2 2J15/~7 mir 14 64. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 65. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works 66. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 67. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 68. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 69. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES 70. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Fire Department's transmittal dated January 21, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 71. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 4, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 72. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. R:~TAFJ:'R.PT~3PA96.]~"2 2/18/9'7 mr 73. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County o~ Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 5, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 74. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 75. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's transmittal dated November 8, 1996, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Applicant Name ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1997 R:~STAFFRPT~.93PA96.CCl 4/14197 klb 23 Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:14 PM. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, Temecula, representing the First Baptist Church, stated they are opposed to this amendment as fortune telling activities seem to be located next to undesirable businesses and a criminal-type element. Chairman Fahey closed the public comment section at 7:18 PM. Mr. Weiner requested amendment of the Land Use Matrix for the Old Town Specific Plan, page 3-18, and Section 3 of the Ordinance to include psychic/fortune telling in the permitted activities. It was moved by Commissioner Webster and seconded by Commissioner Miller to adopt Resolution No. 97-002 recommending approval by the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-003 and Planning Application No. PA97-0016 (Development Code Amendment and Old Town Specific Plan Amendment) with the proposed modifications based upon the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, and to close the public hearing. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS None Chairman Fahey called for a recess at 7:21 PM. Chairman Fahey reconvened the meeting at 7:29 PM. 7. Plannirlg Application No. PA96-0793 (Development Plan, Southwest Comer of Pauba Road and Margarita Road) Associate Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He reported additional Conditions of Approval were received from the Community Services District, which will be attached as an exhibit, and the Department of Public Works have added the following conditions: Under the section 'Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits": o Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pauba Road in accordance with City standards including provisions for the interconnect. o Add to Condition 60, The developer is eligible for credit for regional signal facilities installed by him/her. Under "Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits": o The traffic signals at Margarita Road and Pauba Road shall be installed and operational. R: \?LANCO~q\MINUTES\1997\l-27-97.W~D 2/25/97 vgw 5 ~T.]~lq'~TT~G CO~TJ:IF~TC)N O'~lq'O~i~Y :~7. 1997 Commissioner Webster asked if there was a condition requiting a sign program and Mr. Fagan rep--~l Condition 15 addresses signs. Commissioner Shaven asked if Condition 6A and Condition 15 were contradictory. Mr. Fagan stated 6A limits what they can do for the sign program and its intent is one business with three (3) suites would not have three (3) signs. Commissioner Miller questioned the left-turn pocket on Margarita Road shown on the exhibits when the staff report mentioned only right in/right out tums will be allowed. Mr. Parks stated there is a full median on Margarita Road and the exhibit shown tonight is predicated on a full signalizafion at the Margarita Road/Pauba Road intersection which must be operational before left tums will be allowed at that location. Commissioner Miller mentioned it appears the building's back will face the front of a building on the NC-zoned property to the west of this project. Mr. Fagan stated there is really only one way to layout the site and the intent is for the rears of the two buildings to face each other. Commissioner Miller asked what mitigation is being incorporated to make the project compatible with existing land use in the vicinity. Mr. Fagan answered reduction of the building size from the previously approved project, and compliance with the California Business and Professions Code and the Cirv's Development Code in regards to applicant acquiring the necessary entitlements to sell alcohol. Commissioner Miller asked if there is a condition for special lighting to reduce bright lights shining into residences. Mr. Fagan stated lighting was not addressed. Commissioner Slaven asked about the height of the property after grading. Mr. Parks stated the grading plans indicate it will be 4 to 5 feet above the Pauba Road/Margarita Road intersection Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:58 PM. Chairman Fahey reported she had a telephone conversation with Lan'y Markham, applicants' representative, regarding circulation, grading and compatibility with neighbors. Commissioner Slaven reported meeting with Larry Markham and reviewing the plans and discussed general concerns of the owner and residents. Commissioner Miller reported he met with Larry Markham and reviewed the plans. Commissioner Soltysiak reported he met with Larry Markham and reviewed the plans. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Suite L, Temecula, representing the applicant, stated ~,, concur with the additional conditions proposed by the Community Services District and the Departr of Public Works. He clarified the improvement plans provide for a protected left-turn-in-only into me site off Margarita Road and does not see any condition to preclude such a turn. He mentioned the hill R: \PLANC(I~4\MZNUTES\1997\l-27-97.WPD 2/25/97 v~w 6 ~T.~NTNG CO~I(TBBTO~ O"AN'O~RY ')7. 1997 will be cut down to make it more compatible with Pauba and Margarita Roads. He clarified Condition (5 dictates where the signs can be located, not the type; Condition 36 requires all lighting be directed downward so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way and the lights will meet Mt. Palomar low pressure sodium requirements. Chairman Fahey inquired about having landscape areas in the excess parking spaces and expressed concern about parking spaces 10 and 12 presenting a safety ba7~rd. Mr. Markham stated parking was dictated by the request from Public Works that the access points be as far away from the intersection as possible and parking spaces 10 and 12 can be eliminated. Commis.~ioner Solty~ak asked about the Community Services District No. 3 condition relating to the trail. Mr. Markham replied the CSD trail has been provided for and even though dedication has not been secured further south, the developer will not put any signs or trees in the path, but will plant turf. An Pelka, 43185 Margarita Road, Temecula, presented a copy of a petition signed by 1,024 Temecula residents opposing this project which will be presented to the City Council. He asked the Commission to deny this project. Jon Hoxter, 31249 Sierra Bonita, Temecula, read the above-mentioned petition into the record. He also stated his opposition to the project. Commissioner Slaven questioned where and how the signatures were acquired for the petition. Mr. Hoxter replied signatures were gathered by many people at the Lucky and Target shopping centers, and in surrounding neighborhoods. He stated some of the people signing the petition do not live in the project area, but their children attend the high schools and/or participates in activities at the Sports Park. Richard Padcot, 31320 Cone Rimola, Temecula, stated he is not opposed to the NC zoning, but believes the building is totally out of scale, is not taking the canyon-view into consideration, and does not relate to surrounding architecture. He recommended a cross section through the street and property be done to show the grade elevation. Commissioner Slaven asked Mr. Racicot for his suggestions on the design. Mr. Racicot replied breaking up the long roof would help and needs a more residential feel similar to the fire station and recreation center. Roi Nieto, 43198 Cone Almonte, Temecula, stated he is Ol!posed to the project as there is significant commercial area within a couple of miles - Rancho California/Margarita Road and Margarita Road/Hwy 79S. Kandi Nieto, 43198 Cone Almonte, Temecula, stated ten (10) years from now, original businesses will have left and then undesirable activities will come into a family-oriented area. Larry Markham reiterated this is not a zoning issue, but a site plan proposal which is in compliance with the Development Code and applicant has agreed to everything staff has requested. R: \PLANCO~\MINUTES\1997\l-27-97.WPD 2/25/97 v~, 7 pT.]~IqNTNG COin(TR;tTON ,.TJtNIT~RY PT, 1997 Commissioner Webster asked the reasons for this particular design. Mr. Markham replied the site In,,ts dimted the design; staff asked for the tower, additional articulations to the front and back; and there are not any lots which will look down on the roof. Chairman Fahey stated it a~ the architectural enhancements were added to soften the strip mall appearance. Mr. Markham answered this is a long, slender site and the building has been broken up by the tower features, added awnings, trellises, trees and tile, and the rear set- back. Chairman Fahey closed the public comment section at 8:40 PM. Commissioner Webster commented: there is no pending City Council zoning approval to hold up a decision on this project; he personally is satisfied with the architecture - the towers break up the roof pattern, and the scale is consistent with other buildings in the area; grading is appropriate and the higher lots to the south are not aesthetically impacted; he agrees with eliminating parking spaces 10 and 12; has no problem with the dedicated left-ram; wants denser (evergreen and deciduous) tree plantings along the top of the slope on the south and west sides; a mix of tree sizes throughout the project; and asked staff to make a diligent effort to ensure there is a balance between too much and too little light. Commissioner Slaven stated her comments: a NC designation is not downzoning, due to the location of the property; the developer is aware of the concerns of the residents and something more than a redesi~,, of a previously presented strip mall could have been presented; adding a tower seems to be the stan creative architectural answer and is not appropriate for this comer; she disagrees with the findings m,.[ the overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare because the potential uses are primarily for the profitability of the developer as it would be difficult to operate a business here that did not sell alcohol; she agrees the architectural design was done for the developer's profitability and not compatibility with the neighborhood community. Commissioner Miller stated: the structure should have a more residential appearance; he cannot support a strip mall that is not designed more to fit into its location; he feels the mitigation measur~ do not make this project compatible with the neighboring land use. Chairman Fahey's comments were: this location needs to be commercial; she does not like the design because the tile line and the identical shape and size of entrances accentuate the building length and strip mall look; this unique location requires distinctive treatment; i.e, separate-appearing, but connected buildings; excess parking spaces could become gathering places; the turrets do break up the building, but should be tapered or varied; architecture should blend with surrounding buildings; additional landscape enhancements; cutting back on square footage and building length would be helpful; vary front features for character. She said in the past staff had one or two commissioners' review preliminary plans, which might also work for this project. Commissioner Webster remarked he could see shortening the building about 30 feet, but could not suppo,~ separate buildings due to site constraints, security problems, and cost. R: \PLANCO~gi\MINUTF~\1997\l-27-97.WPD 2125/97 vgw 8 pT.~,I~TI~TTNG COI~TB~TON ~T~NU~,RY ~7, ~997 Mr. Thornhill stated the~ are constraints on this project due to the law suit; but it is his opinion that the developer can do more with this site. He mentioned the Bonsall Shopping Center as a good design example which has some of the amenities be suitable for this location; i.e., gathering places, benches, etc. Mr. Thomhill suggested the applicant come back with conceptual, sketched designs rather than formal drawings. Commissioner Miller asked if the Commission should consider law suit ramifications in making a decision and Mr. Weiner replied, the Commission should only consider the application before it. Commissioner Slaven suggested the applicant should work closely with Mr. Thornhill, who can represent the Commission. Mr. Markham's response to the Commissioner's comments were: there are limited modifications that can be made to the site; parking spaces can be eliminated; pads can be offset somewhat for architectural interest; gathering places and more landscaping can be added; a gazebo area created; a couple of features added to the roof structure; there are security concerns with separate buildings; and rear access is to address fu'e department concerns. He suggested the possibility of an ad hoc committee made up of a couple of Commissioners and staff members to consider design features. It was moved by Commissioner Slaven and seconded by Commissioner Miller to continue this matter to the February 24, 1997 meeting. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 NOES: 1 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak COMMISSIONERS: Webster COMMISSIONERS None Commissioners Slaven and Webster agreed to work with staff on this matter. Mr. Weiner cautioned Commissioners to report any contact they have with this applicant at the next meeting. PLANNING MANAGER'~ REPORT Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske stated the Commission members can attend a day session of the Planners Institute and asked them to let her or Valerie Wimberly know before February 1, 1997. PI,ANN1NG COMMI~gION nTSCltS~TON Commissioner Webster asked about the two public hearings regarding 1) Enterprise Rental Cars in the Winchester "uare Shopping Center, requesting outside storage of rental cars and 2) the proposed restaurant on Lyndie .~e. Mr. Fagan replied Enterprise would park about 20 cars in the rear of the Center. Mr. Thomhill stated .etail trucks are not allowed to be located at the Center. Mr. Fagan replied the restaurant will be located off Lyndie Lane, north of the vet building with a driveway and parking spaces between the two buildings. R: \PLANCOi~q\MINUTES\1997\l-27-97.~pD 2/25/97 v~ 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1997 R:~STAFFRP"F~93PA96.CC! 4/14/9~7 klb 2 4 pI'.ANNT~G COI4~TB~TO~T F~.~RU]~RY ~4. !997 .. Plannin~ Applications PA96-0793 - (Development Plat0 - Ted 7onos Associate Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report recommending approval of the design and construction of a 19,729 square foot commercial development and associated parking, landscaping, road and drainage improvements located at the southwest comer of Margarita and Pauba Roads. Commissioner Slaven questioned the height of the site stating the artist's rendering pictures it at ground level and at the January 27, 1997 meeting, it was her understanding the site would be about 4' above street level. Mr. Parks stated there is to be a 4' slope and it is difficult to tell from this rendition the slope height. Commissioner Miller suggested the condition be modified such that the landscaping plans provide for t~ees to be consistent with the rendering, there was a certain level of mature trees in the rendering. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Suite L, Temecula, representing the applicant, stated the call outs have to be modified with regard to the square footage of the building, and the parking spaces changed in the resolution and staff report. Wayne Banks, 19732 MacArthur Blvd, Irvine, architect, stated the pad is four to five feet above the surface of Margarita Road, a berm runs two to three feet along Panba and Margarita Roads, and the use of mature palms is planned. Commissioner Miller asked if any type of fence is planned for the top of the retaining wall and Mr. Banks replied a fence would be good for safety purposes and also ivy will be planted to conceal the wall. Mr. Markham mentioned the applicant will work with staff regarding softening of tile accents. Commissioner Miller mentioned he met with Mr. Thomhill and City staff to determine how to make this project work and he also talked to Mr. Racicot about the applicant's revised plans. Commissioner Webster stated he met with Mr. Markham and City staff to review the submitted plans. Chairman Fahey reopened the public hearing at 8:34 PM. Roi Nieto, 43198 Corte Almonte, Temeeula, stressed the quality of this development is vital to the community and he supports professional-type businesses as tearants. He asked the Commission to continue the item until all details are completed. Mike Curry, 42965 Via Gandia, Temecula, stated the drive in the rear of the building will create a trashy alleyway that will be used as a thoroughfare. Richard Racicot, 31320 Corm Rimola, Temecula, explained his architectural concept of the site and presented the results of his survey of Paloma del $ol residents and requested the Commission postpone approval until the developer implements the suggested improvements. R: \PLA~C{1MM\MINUTES\1997\2-24-97.WPD 3/5/97 701-06 6 ~T,~Iql~TT~G CO~I~[TBBTO~ F~R~RY P4, 1997 Philip Hoover, 31335 Cone Rimoh, Tcmccula, stated design and aesthetics of the cente~ will deter, tenants and the higher the qualit), and maintenance, the better the tenants attracted to the area. lVlr. Markham respond's to Mr. Racicot's design was: the dimensions of the lot and building and access points make eliminating the driveway impossible; a patio in back of Building C would be 20' off the ground and doing anything in the rear would create noise, lights, etc which impact the westerly and southerly neighbors. Commissioner Miller expressed his concern over eastbound Pauba Road traffic taking a shortcut thru the property to go southbound on Margarita Road. Mr. Markham suggested making the Pauba Road drive a one-way exit would eliminate any shortcut traffic. Commissioner Slaven asked about the trees in the raised planter boxes shown on the landscape plan. Mr. Banks stated the planters were more like walls and other items - shrubs, ground cover, and perhaps another tree - would be planted in the area. Commissioner Miller requested wrought iron be required on top of the wall. Commissioner Slaven suggested using something other than crepe myrtles as they do not do well in this area and do not provide much screening. Mr. Thornhill stated perhaps other trees could be added as crepe myrtles do add seasonal color. Chairman Fahey closed the public comment section at 9:22 PM. Commissioner Miller suggested the back access road be one-way and flow from Margarita Road to Pauba Road. Chairman Fahey stated that she did not think a gate or spikes in the road were necessary, but signs prohibiting two way traffic might be appropriate. It was moved by Commissioner Slavcn and seconded by Commissioner Webster to adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; to adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; and to adopt Resolution No. 97-004 approving Planning Application No. PA96-0293 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, and the Conditions of Approval stated in the Public Works memo dated January 27, 1997, and adding enhancement of landscaping in back of the building, wrought iron fencing, and mature trees in the front, and to close the public hearing. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS None R: \PLANCO/~I\MINUT~S\1997\2-24-97.NPD 3/5/97 vgw 701-06 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 CORRESPONDENCE R:~TAFFR.PT~93PA96.CC1 4114/9"/klb 25 NOV 1 8 1996 cc: G. Thornhill 28-0ct-1996 Ron Roberts Jeff Stone PO Box 9033 T~mecula, Ca 92589-9033 Dear Mr. Roberts and Mr. Stone In September I was shocked to Read in the Paloma Del Sol "Neighborhood News," that consideration was being given by the planning commission to allow development of the corner of Margarita and Pauba for a mini mall. This is a very busy corner with a lot of traffic. Their is presently no t- =fic light on this intersection. Any type of commericial development ~ ~ increase traffic congestion in this residential area. This particular parcel of land is at a very visible location. A mini mall would with its business signs and parking lot, and commercial architecture be a visual blight on this lovely residential area. This corner is close to four schools. Any type of mi~i mall would bring some type of market, liquor store or fast food business. The area would be a hang out location for students from all FOUR schools before,during and after school. Gang problems, fights, drug problems and vandalism would become constant problems for the residents of the area. Residents of the area already have adequate shopping with markets and stores on either side of the Margarita and Pauba, .both north and south on Margarita. PLEASE, THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA DO NOT NEED, NOR DO THEY WANT A MINI MALL OR ANY BUSINESS AT THE CORNER OF MARGARITA AND PAUBA. I MOVED TO TEMECULA FOR THE QUALITY OF LIFE. IT COSTS ME DEARLY EACH MONTH. PLEASE DO NOT DAMAGE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THOSE OF US WHO LIVE NEAR THE CORNER OF MARGARITA AND PAUBA BY ENDORSING COMMERCIAL USE OF THIS PARCEL. r ' G~9FF ,! r; , ~O)~ 891225J' / /./ // cc: G. Thornhill January 22, 1997 Temecula City Council P.O Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Temecula City Council: I am writing this brief letter in regards to a hearing you are having the week of January 27, 1997. I'm unable to attend but would like my opinion to be heard. I am opposed to the two strip centers being planned for the Margarita comdor. The comer of Pauba and Margarita should be developed only as a professional services type structure due to its close proximity to Temcula Valley High School. The intersection of Margarita and Hwy 79 South already has a mega center going in with all the necessary stores needed, Albertson's, Payless, Blockbuster, McDonald's, Chevron, and numerous other stores as well as possibly movie theaters. There is no need for the Lucky's/Savon center so close, it would Just be a smaller duplicate of Its neighbor across the street. Please do not allow this area to be over developed. In three years when the initial leases begin to expire we will have a mostly vacant strip center unable to compete with the larger centers of albertson's on Hwy 79 South and Target on Ynez. This will cause a decline in property value and create an eye sore causing slower growth of our great community. Thank you for your time and attention. A Concerned Paloma Del Sol Resident, William Anderson cc: G. Thornhill January27,1997 Hon. K. Lindeman, Mayor City of Temecula City Hall City of Temecula Dear Mr. Mayor: I had planned to to deliver the attached comments at the City Council Meeting on January 28 in opposition to the proposed zoning changes at Margarita and Pauba, but my schedule precludes my attendance. Will you please make these comments avatlable to the other councdmen prtor to the meettng. and also make them a part of the of'fictal record Norman Kelley 31410 Cala Carrasco Temecula, Ca. 92592 909 699 5819 MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, I AM NORMAN KELLEY, AND MY ADDRESS IS 31401 CALA CARRASCO. I AM HERE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED iMPROVEMENT AT THE CORNER OF PAUBA AND MARGARITA. I'M SURE THAT WHEN CITY PLANNERS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND THIS COUNCIL ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED THE GENERAL PLAN AND MADE SUBSEQUENT ZONING DECISIONS ON THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THiS hEARING, PROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES WHERE FOLLOWED. I'M SURE THAT THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY WERE PARAMOUNT. OF COURSE, AT THE TIME, THE AREA CONSISTED OF BARREN HILLS, AND NO ONE ACTUALLY KNEW HOW ALL OF THIS WOULD SPECIFICALLY DEVELOP, AND OVER WHAT TIMELINE. i AM EQUALLY CERTAIN THAT WE PURCHASERS OF HOMES IN PALOMA DEL SOL SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE ASTU?E IN UNDERSTANDING THE EXISTING ZONING. ON THE OTHER HAND, (AND I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE PURCHASED A NEW HOME LATELY), I WAS DELUGED WITH INFORMATION THAT I'M SURE WAS WELL INTENDED DISCLOSURE. EVERYTHING FROM SEWAGE PLANTS TO WATER QUALITY .... ENDANGERED SPECIES TO GARBAGE COLLECTION. IT'S ALSO A STRESSFUL TIME...MOVING JOBS AND FAMILIES...AND SOME THINGS DIDN'T CLICK AS THEY SHOULD HAVE. BUT .... THIS ISN'T ABOUT WHAT THIS COUNCIL DID A DECADE AGO, OR WHAT HOMEOWNERS DIDN'T GRASP TWO YEARS AGO. IT'S ABOUT WHAT IS RIGHT FOR TEMECULA IN i997. WHATEVER IS BUILT ON THAT CORNER WILL BE THERE FOR 75 '~EARS, AND IT'S OBVIOUSLY IMPORTANT TO MAKE A CLEAR HEADED DECISION. iN ONE OF THE RECENT PLANNING CO~4_MISSlON MEETINGS, A COMMISSIONER SAID..."A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS THiS IS FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE RESIDENTS iN THAT AREA." ........... AND THAT IS EXACTLY THE POINT. THE RESIDENTS SEE NEITHER A NEED OR A CONVENIENCE IN A SMALL COmmERCIAL AREA WHEN A HUGE CENTER IS BEING DEVELOPED 2 MILES TO THE SOUTH, AND ONE ALREADY EXISTS ONE MILE TO THE NORTH. THE ~.%~NING COM~!SSION NOTED THAT OTHER $~iA~L COMMERCIAL PLOTS EXIST IN PALOMA DEL SOL. WHAT WASN'T MENTIONED IS THAT NONE OF THF ARE YET DEVELOPED AND ALL OF THEM ARE GUARANTEED TO BE UNPOPULAR. IN MY OPINION, THESE POCKETS OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY ARE A FLAWED IT'S SUBJECTIVE TO PREDICT WHAT A SMALL COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER MIGHT FINALLY BECOME, BUT THERE IS A GOOD CHANCE THAT IF THE RESIDENTS DO NOT SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT, IT WILL BECOME A MAGNET FOR MARGINAL BUSINESSES, AND IT IS ALMOST GUARANTEED TO BECOME AH AF~ER SCHOOL HANGOUT FOR HiGH SCHOOL KIDS, AND POSSIBLY A PLACE WHERE USERS OF THE SPORT PARK BUY THINGS AND SPREAD THEIR LITTER. WHEN ALTERNATIVE ZONING WAS RAISED, THE PROPONENTS MADE A CASE REGARDINO THE HIGH VACANCY RATES OF PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS IN TEMECULA, AND t DO NOT DISPUTE THAT. BUT THEY STATE O~LY PART OF THE STORY. SMALL RETAIL COMPLEXES ALSO HAVE HIGH VACANCY RATES. THE PROPONENTS ALSO STATE THAT THIS FRONTAG~ 1S NOT $UITABL~ FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. THAT COM. M~NT DEFIES LOGIC AND COMaMOW SENSE. THERE IS A RESIDENCE NOW UNDER CONSTRUCTION JUST TO THE WEST ON PAUBA AND MARGARITA IS LINED WiTH HOUSES FOR MILES. ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME ASP£CTS OF DEVELOPMENT AND SOME OF THE ARGUMENTS ARE ACTUALLY JUST A MATTER OF TIMING. BUT THE CRUCIAL ISSUE HERE iS ULTIMATE COMPATIBILITY. AND THAT iS PERF~ANENT. THE RESIDENTS THAT i HAVE TALKED TO FIRMLY BELIEVE THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMEN~~ IS iNCOMPATIBLE WITH A F~iLY ORIENTED NEIGHBORHOOD.. KNOW J~HiS TO BE A FACT, BUT THIS BOD'i iS PROBABLY CONCERNED OVER BEING A GOOD BUSINESS PARTNER WITH DEVELOPERS, WHICH iS A GOOD OBJECTIVE. ON THE O~HER HAND, THERE COULD BE A PERCEPTION THAT THE CiTY iS NOT a GOOD PARTNER IF ZONING CHANGES ARE .MADE IN RESPONSE TO PROPERTY OWNERS CONCERNS. BUT IN ~'HIS SITUATION, THE CITY SHOULD NOT BE CONCERNED WITH DISCUSSIONS OVER iNVERSE CONDF_"INATION .... A iR ALL.. .THE OWNERS OF THE DPERTY DID NoT PAY T~E CITY FOR THE INCREASED ¥'AL0£ OF THE PROPERTY WHEN THZ PARCEL ~;A$ Z,DN~D CO~4'£RCIALLY, AND THE CiTY SHOULD NOT HESlTAT'£ TO MAKE THE CHANGE SiMPL~ BECAUSE THE PROPERTY BECOMES LESS VALUABLE UNDER REVISED ZONi['4~ ORDINANCE. THE PLANNING ,'JOM_M£S$ION iS APPARENTLY ASSUMING THIS IS ALL A DONE DEAn, HAVING REVIEWED DEVELOPMENT PLANS ON THIS PROPERTY LAST N£GHT. i HOPE THE CiTY COUNCIL PAUSES AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERS AND CONCERNS BEFORE ~,'ACH_'N,3 A DECISION FROM PERSPECTIVE, i WOULD LiKE TO ASK "WHAT DOES ANOTHER TINY STRIP i~ALL ADD TL~ ~::~ QUALITY OF LiFE IN ~M~CULA ESPECIALLY WHEN THE TARGETED PATRONS OF THE MALL DO NOT WANT IT ~ THANK '~OU. ATTACHMENT NO. 8 ORIGINAL EXHIBITS R:~STAFFRPTY?.93PA96.CC1 4/14/97 klb 26 II CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 SITE PLAN FROM JANUARY 27, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 22, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA MARGARITA ROAD/ PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 LANDSCAPE PLAN FROM JANUARY 27, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 22, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 ELEVATIONS FROM JANUARY 27, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 22, 1997 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 REVISED PROJECT APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION ~.:~T^FFILP'T~93PA96.CC! 4/14/97 Ub 27 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 APPROVED SITE PLAN: FEBRUARY 24, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 22, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN: FEBRUARY 24, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 22, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 APPROVED ELEVATIONS: FEBRUARY 24, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 22, 1997 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Pete Labahn, Chief of Police April 22, 1997 Public Hearing Regarding Use of Grant Funds PREPARED BY: Lt. Jim Domenoe RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing to solicit input from members of the public as to the appropriate use for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. DISCUSSION: In June of 1996, the Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance made grant funds available through the 1996 Omnibus Appropriations Act. The City of Temecula secured a direct award of $45,751 on February 13, 1997. One of the grant requirements is that the City provide a cash match of $5,083. These funds may be used for a variety of purposes from increasing personnel and equipment resources to developing and supporting programs which enhance effective criminal justice processes. In addition to a public hearing, the grant required that an advisory committee be established to provide input and make non-binding recommendations as to the use of the funds. The committee was formed and consisted of one member each from the local District Attorney's office, Court Administrator, Police Department, and Temecula Valley Unified School District. On April 7, 1997, this committee met and unanimously recommended the purchase of a mobile command post trailer. The command post trailer will be used in a variety of scenarios. It will be used to bring crime prevention training to local schools and neighborhoods. It will also serve as a mobile command center for crime scenes, natural disasters and special events and will act as a mobile police station during specialized enforcement efforts such as DUI checkpoints and enforcement sweeps. The police department believes that the purchase of these items will increase the efficiency of the police department's crime prevention and education efforts while augmenting our enforcement capabilities. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. R:\agenda.rpt\grntfd.pd I ITEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPR(:~,L,~--'~ C TY A rORNE . . DIRECTOR OF FIl~r~,'~:' ~ CITY OF TEMECU~ AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director' April 22, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0042, Development Code Amendment, Planning Application No. PA97-0016, Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, and Planning Application PA97-0110, Temecula Municipal Code Amendment Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE I OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY" AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES AND AMENDING SECTION 5.04.050 (63) THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FORTUNE TELLING AND RELATED PRACTICES BACKGROUND This Ordinance is a result of the City Council direction to staff to process amendments to the City's Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to treat fortune telling businesses and similar uses as permitted uses in Commercial, Office and Business Park Zoning Districts. The current requirement calls for a Conditional Use Permit. On February 25, 1997, the City Council as a result of public input, continued this item and instructed the City Attorney to research the legal issues related to adoption of this Ordinance. The February 25, 1997 Staff Report is included as Attachment 2. R:k~TAFFRFl~I6PA~'.CC2 4/11/97 sa 1 DISCUSSION The City Attorney has reviewed the legal implications of the Ordinance and has instructed staff to delete the word 'spiritualism" from the Ordinance. The City Attorney feels, with this deletion, the City is on solid legal grounds and addresses the concerns expressed by Mayor Pro- Tem Roberts. No other changes have been made to the proposed Ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Ordinance No. 97- - Page 3 February 25, 1997, City Council Staff Report - Page 7 February 25, 1997, City Council Minutes - Page 8 January 27, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 9 January 27, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes - Page 10 Letter from the City Attorney - Page 11 R:~STAFFRFI~I6PA97.CC2 4/11/97 m 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 97- R:~'TAFFRl~I6PA97.CC'2 4/11/97 m 3 ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW "FORTUNE TFJ~T.1NG, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY' AS PERMITrED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CAIJFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; and B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to ensure its clarity and completeness; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. D. The said uses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts on the surrounding uses to require Conditional Use Permits for them. Section 2. Table 17.08(a) of the Development Code is hereby amended to replace the current line for "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" with the following: Fortune Telling, or Similar Activity NC CC HT SC PO BP LI P P P P P P - R:~TAFFRFIAI6PA97.CC'2 4/11/97 m 4 Section 3. Table 1 of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to replace the current line for 'Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" with the following: Fortune Telling or Similar Activity TSR ItTC OTC TRC TSO CCTS CC -- p -- p P P P Psychic/ Fortune Telling -- P -- P P p p Section 4. Section 5.04.050 (63) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended by deleting therefrom the last sentence which reads 'Additionally, a special permit from the city manager must be obtained'. Section 5. ~.nvironmental Determination The City Council hereby determines that these amendments to the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan do not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Development Code and Zoning Map and the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs. Further, these projects are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It also states, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. These projects comply with the requirements for this section as there is no possibility that the adoption of these amendments may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 6. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\STAI:rFRF~I6PA97.CC2 4/11197 sa 5 Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO~ this ~ day of ,1997. Pat Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of ,1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES' COUNCILMEMBERS NOES' COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:LSTAFFRFI~I6PA97.CC2 4/11/97 an 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 1997 R:~STAFFRPT~I6PA97.CC2 4/11/97 s~ 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO ;, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIIiIA~;~E CITY MANAGER ~~,,.. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director February 25, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0042, Development Code Amendment and Planning Application No. PA97-0016, Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, Fortune Telling Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08~a) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, SPIRITUALISM, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY" AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES 2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 5.04.050 I63) THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FORTUNE TELLING AND RELATED PRACTICES BACKGROUND As a result of City Attorney concerns, on December 10, 1996, the City Council instructed staff to process amendments to the City's Develol~ment Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to treat fortune telling businesses as I~ermitted uses in Commercial, Office and Business Park Zoning Districts. The current requirement calls for a Conditional Use Permit. R:~STAFFRF~I6PA9"/.CC 2/1819'/k.lb 1 On January 27, 1997, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item and recommended approval with a 5-0 vote. At the meeting the City Attorney recommended that Psychic/Fortune Telling uses in the Old Town Specific Plan should be addressed in a similar manner with the other amendments. In addition to the change in the Development Code, the City Attorney is also recommending that the Council repeal that portion of Temecula Municipal Code Section 5.04.050 {63) which requires fortune tellers to obtain a "special permit' from the City Manager in order to engage in such activities. According to the City Attorney, the courts have ruled that fortune telling, and related activities, are protected free speech activities under the First Amendment and that broad permit requirements affecting First Amendment activities without specific procedures and detailed criteria for issuing the permit have been held invalid. The two ordinances would repeal the special provisions affecting persons engaged in fortune telling. However, these uses would still be subject to all of the zoning regulations affecting the zone in which they will operate in the same manner as other similar uses and will be subject to the same state statues and city ordinance relating to the operation of a business as are other businesses in the City. DISCUSSION The Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan currently require a Conditional Use Permit for fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activities. According to Section 17.04,010 of the Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit is intended to allow the establishment of those uses which have some special impact or uniqueness such that their effect on the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular location. This Section further states that the Conditional Use Permit provides the City with the means to review the location, design, configuration of uses, and potential impact and compatibility with the surrounding area. Similar provisions are included in the Old Town Specific Plan. In the NC, CC, HTC, SC, PO. and BP Zoning Districts of the Development Code, fortune telling and similar uses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts, other than those generally caused by any other office or professional service uses on the surrounding areas. Staff recommends that these proposed amendments be approved to allow the "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" uses as permitted uses in the specified Zoning Districts in a similar manner to professional service businesses. In the Development Code, staff is recommending to prohibit these uses in the Light industrial (LI) Zoning District. This recommendation is based on a current provision of the Development Code which prohibits offices and professional services with less than 50,000 square feet. Further, for the Old Town Specific Plan, staff is recommending to add these uses as permitted uses in the HTC, CCTS, and CC Zoning Districts. This recommendation is based on the similarity of these zones with the HTC and CC Zoning Districts of the Development Code. As a result, Table I of Section III of the Old Town Specific Plan, Land Use Matrix, is proposed to be amended to designate" Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" as permitted uses in the Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC), Tourist Retail Core (TRC), Shootout Zone (TSO), Community Commercial and Tourist Support (CCTS), and Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Districts. R:\STA~I6PA9'7.CC 2/18197 kfb 2 FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Ordinance No. 97- - Page 4 Ordinance No. 97- - Page 8 January 27, 1997, Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 January 27, 1997, Planning Commission Minutes - Page 12 R:~'T~I61~A~7.CC 271~7 k~ 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 1997 R:~STA~=~RI~I6PA97.CC2 4/11~)7 .,~ ~ City Courtell Minutet Febmaw 25. 1997 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.081a) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE I OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, SPIRITUALISM, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY' AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES 19.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 5.04.050 (63) THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FORTUNE TELLING AND RELATED PRACTICES The motion failed as follows: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Birdsall NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Stone COUNCIL BUSINESS 20. Citizen ODinion Survey City Manager Bradley introduced Dr. Estaban Serianto, of The Resource Group who presented the results of City of Temecula residents views on issues and services relating to police, fire, parks, recreation, traffic, land use, economic development, public facilities and infrastructure and numerous quality of life issues. He reported that residents ranked the overall quality of life in Temecula very high. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to extend the meeting to 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Birdsall ordered the report received and filed. 20 (a) Parcel MaD No. ?6737-?. Located at the Southeast Corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road Minute,\02~25~97 - 11- 03/27197 City Council Minutel Febmew 25. 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 97-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES AND AUTHORIZING THEIR USE The motion was unanimously carried. 19. Planning Aoolication No. 97-0047. r~evelooment Code Amendment and Planning Ao!~lication No. PA97-0016. Old Town Soecific Plan Amendment. Fortune Telling Councilmember Stone announced a conflict of interest, based on property ownership in Old Town, and stepped down from the dias. Councilmember Lindemans announced a conflict of interest, based on religious convictions and stepped down from the dias. Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff rel~ort. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:32 PM Gary Simon, 33009 Tulley Rancho Road, addressed the City Council requesting fortune telling and spiritualism be disallowed in the City of Temecula. He requested this item be continued for six months to research the effects of these types of businesses on a community. Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 9:39 PM. Councilmember Roberts asked if there is a definition of the differences between spiritualism and fortune telling. City Attorney Thorson stated he is not aware of any cases that draw distinctions between the two. He explained that this is a land use ordinance, and adoption does not condone these activities. He stated the State Supreme Court has ruled that Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, etc. is protected under the First Amendment , and may not be regulated through a land use ordinance. He explained other codes protect against theft and other problems that may be associated with these activities. It was moved by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Mayor Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 19.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- Minutel~02~25~97 - 10- O3127/97 ATTACHMENT NO. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 27, 1997 R:~TAFFRPT~I6PA97.CC~ 4/11/97 sa 9 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 27, 1996 Planning Application No. PA97-0003, Development Code Amendment and Planning Application No. PA97-0016, Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, Fortune Telling Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0003 and Planning Application No. PA97-0016 (Development Code Amendment and Old Town Specific Plan' Amendment) based upon the Analysis and Finding[ contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROPOSAL: A Request for Approval of a Development Code Amendment and Old Town Specific Plan Amendment to allow "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity"as .permitted uses rather than conditionally permitted uses. LOCATION: Citywide BACKGROUND The Development Code ana the Old Town Specific Plan currently require a Conditional Use Permit for fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activities. According to Section 17.04.010 (a) of the Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit is intended to allow the establishment of those uses which have some special impact or uniqueness such that their effect on the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular location. This Section further states that the Conditional Use Permit provides the City with the means to review the location, design, configuration of uses, and potential impact and com!~atibility with the surrounding area. Similar provisions are included in the Old Town Specific Plan. R:~,S TA,~=RPT~ORTUNE.pc 1/'2.2/97 As a result of City Attorney concerns, on December 10, 1996, the City Council instructed staff to process amendments to the City's Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to treat fortune telling businesses as permitted uses in Commercial, Office and Business Park Zoning Districts. The current requirement calls for a Conditional Use Permit. In addition, pending the effective date of the Amendments, the City Council further instructed staff not to enforce the Conditional Use Permit recluirements for fortune telling and to consider it a permitted use. DISCUSSION Table 17.08 (a) of Section 17.08.030 of the DeveloDment Code, Schedule of Permitted Uses, is proposed to be amended to designate" Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" as permitted uses in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Community Commercial (CC), Highway/Tourist (HTC), Service Commercial (SC), Professional Office (PO), and Business Park (BP) Zoning Districts. In the NC, CC, HTC, SC, PO, and BP Zoning Districts of the Development Code, fortune telling and similar uses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts, other than those generally caused by any other office or professional service uses on the surrounding areas. Staff recommends that these proposed amendments be approved to allow the "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" uses as permitted uses in the specified Zoning Districts in a similar manner to professional service businesses. In the Development Code, staff is recommending to prohibit these uses in the Light Industrial (LI) Zoning District. This recommendation is based on a current provision of the Development Code which prohibits offices and professional services with less than 50,000 square feet. Further, for the Old Town Sl~ecif~_Plan, staff is recommending to add these uses as permitted uses in th~'HTC, CCTS, and CC)Zoning Districts. This recommendation is based on the similarity of these zones with the HTC and CC Zoning Districts of the Development Code. As a result, Table 1 of Section III of the Old Town Specific Plan, Land Use Matrix, is proposed to be amended to designate u Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" as permitted uses in the Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC), Tourist Retail Core (TRC), Shootout Zone (TSO), Community Commercial and Tourist Support (CCTS), and Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Districts. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY These projects are consistent with the General Plan since these commercial uses are considered appropriate in the Commercial, Office, and Business Park Land Use Designations of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION These amendments to the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan do not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associatec with the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Development Code and Zoning Map and the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Rel;)Ort of the City General Plan for the City and its environs. Further, these projects are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, R:'$TAF'FR.P'T~OR~.PC 1~97 m ~ pursuant to Section 15061¢b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guideline,- indicates that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It also states, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. These projects comply with the requirements for this section as there is no possibility that the adoption of these amendments may have a significant effect on the environment. Attachments: Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 4 Exhibit A (Ordianance No. 97- ) - Blue Page 8 City Attorney Correspondence - Blue Page 12 P-:~TAF'FRIrI~OR'EtJNE.PC 1/".2./97 m 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:~T~ORTUNE.pc 1/"2~97 ~ ,~. PC RESOLUTION NO. 97- RESOLIYl'ION OF THE PLANNING COM1M~SION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOM1M'~NDING APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF A DEVELOP1M'I~NT CODE AMEND1MI~NT AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF TFIE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ~ OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a) OF TKE DEVELOPMENT CODE, SCI4~.BULE OF PI~RM1T'FF_,D USES, AND TABLE 1 OF SECTION m, LAND USE MATRIX, OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIlvIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, SPIRITUALISM, OR SI3ffnJAR ACTIVITY' AS PERMIT'F~.n USES RA~ THAN CONDITIONALLY PF.,R1VIITrF~ USES(PLANN'/~G APPLICATION NO. PA97-0003 AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 97-0016) THE PLANNING COMM/SSION OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WI-1ERE~S, the City adopted the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan tha, both identify Fortune Telling, Spmtualism, or Similar Activity as conditionally permitted uses; and, WF!'E~AS, concerns were raised by prospective business owners that the requirement of a Conditional Use Permit may not be warranted and reasonable for Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity; and, WHEREAS, staff brought this issue to City Council to receive direction; and, ~, on December 10. 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula directed staff to prepare a Development Code Amendment and Old Town Specific Plan Amendment to allow "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" as permitted uses rather than conditionally permitted uses (Planning Application No. PA97-0003 and Planning Application No. 97-0016, hereinafter "Amendments"); and, WItEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on January 27, 1997, on the issue of recommending approval or denial of the Amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS: R:~TAFFRFTWORTUN~.pc 1/'2-2/97 m 5 Section 1. That in recommending adoption by the City Council of an Ordinance approving the Amendments, the Planning Commission hereby makes the foRowing findings: (a) That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; and, (b) That there is a need to amend the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to ensure its clarity and completeness; and, (c) That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. (d) The said uses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts on the surrounding commercial uses to require Conditional Use Permits for them. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that these amendments to the DeveIopment Code and the Old Town Specific Plan do not have the potentre1 to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for tl' Development Code and Zoning Map and the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Fina, Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs. Further, these projects are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelme.s. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It also states, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. These projects comply with the requirements for this section as there is no possibility that the adoption of these amendments may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 3. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City CouncL1 adopt and approve the Ordinance approving the Amendment, Exhibit "A", substantially in the form attached hereto. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution to be transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law. R:~qT.SFFR.P~'ORT'UN~.PC I,~Z~'/~r~ fq Section S. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~ this 27th of January, 1997. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERT/FY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of January, 1997, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIOn: PLANNING COMMISSIONS: PLUG COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:X~TAFleRYq~OR'rLr/~.PC 1/'Z2/97 m 7 EXHIBIT ORDINANCE NO. 97- EXHIBIT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AM~...NDING CIL~PTER 17 OF TIlE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND TI~IE OLD TOWN SPECIP/C PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE l?.08(a) OF TI~ DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE I OF TIlE OLr~ TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, SPIRITUAI~M, OR SIMIL&R AC'Ii'VITY' AS PER/VHTYED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMYITED USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALFFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption an~, administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; and B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to ensure its clarity and completeness; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. D. The said uses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts on the surrounding uses to require Conditional Use Permits for them. Section 2. Table 17.08(a) of the Development Code is hereby amended to replace the current line for "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" with the following: Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity NC CC I-IT SC PO BP LI P P P P P P - RAST~OR~J'NE.I~C 1/'22/97 m 9 Section 3. Table 1 of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to replace the current Line for 'Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" with the following: Fortune Telling, Spiritu sm, or Similar Activity TSR I-ITC OTC TRC TSO CCTS CC -- P -- p P P P Section 4. g. nvironmenml Determinerio0 The City Council hereby determines that these amendments to the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan do not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Development Code and Zoning Map and the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs. Further, these projects are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061Co)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It also states, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a sigmficant effect on the environment, the activity is not subjet to CEQA. These projects comply with the requirements for this section as there is no possibility that the adoption of these amendments may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 5. ~everabili~v The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __~ day of ,1997 KareI F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEmi STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECU'LA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at .. regular meeting of the City Councfi on the__ day of ,1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILlVI~MBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COLrNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~TAr"FiUrI~ORTUNE.PC l,r'-Tff97 m 1 ] ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1997 R:~STANFRF~I6PAg'7.CC'2 4/11197 m 10 ~?.Alq'NTNG (2OMiTS;TON ..TPqIT~qY ~7. 1997 no because if the sign is approved by the Commission, it win be a legal one. agreed the sign should be between 25' to 30'. Chairman Fahey flag test showed the sign was visible as visible at 25'. It was moved by Commis:' freestanding freeway-oriented sign at Jefferson Avenue, with the modification to and Fahey to approve a 30 foot Used Cars dealership located at 27500 of the Conditions of Approval. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 Fahey, Miller, NOES: 0 5SIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS None Webster r asked if the Commission was agreeable to staff handling any change in the :n, not 6. Planning Applications PA97-0003 and PA97-0016 - Development Code and Old Town S. pecific Plan Amendment~ Associate Planner Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. Commissioner Slaven asked if other cities dealt with fortune telling, spiritualism and similar activities through the conditional use process. Mr. Naaseh stated he did not know and reiterated these businesses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts from any other office or professional service to require conditional use. Mr. Weiner stated when zoning rules were initially enacted, fortune telling did not have any First Amendment rights because it was considered a conduct rather than speech and the problems that arise are generally fraud, which is a Penal Code issue. Commissioner Soltysiak asked if the conditional use permit approval process is more extensive and Mr. Naaseh replied it was since a public hearing is required. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:14 PM. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, Temecula, representing the First Baptist Church, stated they are opposed to this amendment as fortune telling activities seem to be located next to undesirable businesses and a criminal-type element. Chairman Fahey closed the public comment section at 7:18 PM. Mr. Weiner requested amendment of the Land Use Matrix for the Old Town Specific Plan, page 3-18, and Section 3 of the Ordinance to include psychicfifortune telling in the permitted activities. 5 pT.AN~TNG CO~41~TRRTO~ 0~!~NI~.~Y ?7 · I It was moved by Commissioner Webster and seconded by Commissioner Miller to adopt Resolution. 97-002 recommending approval by the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-003 and Planning Application No. PA97-0016 (Development Code Amendment and Old Town Specific Plan Amendment) with the proposed modifications based upon the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, and to close the public hearing. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven,. Soltysiak, Webster COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS None Chairman Fahey called for a recess at 7:21 PM. Chairman Fahey reconvened the meeting at 7:29 PM. Under Prior to the IssuanC,;. -~ Building Permits: o Design and install a traffic signal'-a~-__"~ intersection with City standards including provisions-,_.~.the ' o Add to Condition 60, The developer is eli him/her. Under Prior to the Issuance of o The traffic signal at Commissioner Condition 15 signs. and Pauba Road in accordance · ~r credit for regional signal facilities installed by Permits: "'-'-- Road and Pauba Road shall be installe~,_. ,~d operational. if there was a condition requiring a sign program ,. ,I Mr. Fagan replied Slaven asked if Condition 6A and Condition 15 were contradictory. Mr. Fag, sated 6A [at they can do for the sign 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 LETTER FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY P.:~STAFFRF1AI6PA~.~ 4111/97 m 1 1 RICHARDS. WATSON & GERSHON AT'TOIqNEYS AT lAW ' ' December 13, 1996 OEC. 1 8 ~9~ By Barry Fisher, Esq. Fleishman, Fisher & Moest 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3160 Los Angeles, California 90067 Re: City of Temcula Fortunetelling ~460320 11086-00001 (213) 253-0216 Dear Mr. Fisher: On December !0, 1996, the City Council instructed the Staff to begin the process of amending the City's Zoning Ordinance to treat fortunetelling as a permitted use in the Commercial, Office and Industrial Zoning Districts of the CiCy rather than as a conditionally permitted use as the zoning ordinance currently provides. Specifically, Table t7.08(a) of Section 17.08.030, Use Regulations, of the Temecula Municipal Code will be amended to designate the use currently described as "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity', as a permitted use in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Community Commercial (CC), Highway/Tourist (HTC), Service Commercial (SC), Professional Office (PO), Business Park District (BP) and Light Industrial (LI) zones. An amendment Co the zoning ordinance requires compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council and the ordinance approving the amendment would require two readings and a 30 day period before taking effect. Next week, the Planning Staff will prepare a tentative schedule of the time frame for this process and schedule tentative hearing dates. Pending the effective date of the new ordinance, the Council has also instructed staff no~ to enforce the conditional use permit requirements for fortunetelling and to consider it a permitted use under Title 17, Zoning, of the Temecula Municipal Code. Thus, there will be no special land use regulations applied to fortunetelling, however, compliance with all RICHARDS. WATSON & GERSHON Barry Fisher, Esq. December 13, 1996 Page 2 applicable provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, including business license, zoning, and building regulations, will be required in the same manner as such regulations are applied to other businesses and uses within the City. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. if you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Peter M. Thorson CC. Gary Thornhill, Director of Community Development Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager PMT:pmt 1480320 i~i'EM 15 APPROVAL ~,~,, ~,,,- CITY ATTORNEY ~v~. F .ANCE CITY MANAGER ~'!,~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald Bradley, City Manager April 22, 1997 Consideration of an Ordinance Prohibiting the Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages and Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places and Prohibiting Engaging in Certain Bodily Functions in Public Places PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney The Staff recommends that the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02..010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES DISCUSSION: If enacted, this Ordinance would prohibit people from drinking alcoholic beverages in public places and would also prohibit people from having an open container of alcoholic beverages in public places. The public places in which this conduct would be prohibited are: (a) On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency; {b) In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas of any commercial shopping center; except on the premises of a commercial establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or (c) Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any public agency. This Ordinance would retain the current provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code which allow the Community Services Commission to issue a special permit to allow the drinking of alcoholic beverages in City parks and which allow the Director of Community Services to issue a similar special permit for other City facilities. The provisions allow the Commission or Director to impose conditions to control the events at which alcoholic beverages would be consumed. The Ordinance would also extend the prohibitions on drinking of alcoholic beverages to the common areas of homeowner associations, but only upon the request of the association and approval of the City Council. This provision has been useful in other cities to assist in controlling drinking on the common areas of associations near streets or parks. Additionally, the Ordinance does not prohibit the drinking of alcoholic beverages on the premises of any commercial establishment having a valid on-sale license or permit from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The Ordinance would also prohibit urinating or defecating in public places. These activities are not addressed by state law and violations of this type of ordinance often occur in connection with the consumption of alcoholic beverages. Penal Code Section 647(f) currently prohibits a person from being intoxicated and disorderly in public and certain diversion programs are utilized for chronic inebriates. Section 12.04.210 of the Temecula Municipal Code currently prohibits the drinking of alcoholic beverages in City parks. R:~agenda.rpt\atcohol 2 ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. read as follows: Chapter 9.14 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to "Chapter 9.14 "CONSUMPTION AND POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PROHIBITED IN CERTAIN PUBLIC PLACES 9.14.010 9.14.020 9.14.030 Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places Prohibited. Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places Prohibited. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages on Homeowner Association Properties Prohibited. "9.14.010 Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited "The drinking of beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage shall be prohibited at the following locations, unless specifically permitted by the prior written approval of the City: 970321 11086-00001 mt 1480417 "(a) On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency; "(b) In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas of any commercial shopping center; except on the premises of a commercial establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or "(c) Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any public agency. "9.14.020 Possession of Open containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places Prohibited. "No person shall have in his or her possession, with intent to consume any part of the contents thereof, any bottle, can or other receptacle containing beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage, which has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed, at the following locations, unless specifically permitted by the prior written approval of the City: "(a) On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency; "(b) In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas of any commercial shopping center; except on the premises of a commercial establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or "(c) Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any public agency. "9.14.030 Consmnption of Alcoholic Beverages on Homeowner Association Properties Prohibited. "No person shall drink any beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage, upon property, including greenbelt areas, common walkways, and common driveways, owned or controlled by a homeowner's association where: "(a) The homeowner's association has requested in writing that the City extend its drinking prohibition upon the homeowner's association property and the City Council has adopted a resolution approving such request; and 970321 11086-00001 mt 1480417 - 2 - "(b) The homeowner's association has posted on the property a notice in substantially the following form: "Drinking of liquors, beers, wine or other intoxicating beverages on this property, including greenbelt areas, common walkways, and common driveways, in prohibited by Chapter 9.14 of the Temecula Municipal Code and violators are subject to criminal prosecution which could result in imprisonmere and a fine." Section 2. Chapter 9.02, General, and Section 9.02.010 are hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 9,02 GENERAL "9.02.010 Bodily Functions Prohibited in Certain Public Areas "9.02.010 Bodily Functions Prohibited in Certain Public Areas "No person shall urinate or defecate on private property in any area exposed to the public view, or on any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency, except in a public or private restroom" Section 3. Section 12.04.210 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "12.04.210 Alcoholic Beverages. "a. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.14, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited in Certain Public Places, the Commission is hereby designated as the body to approve, conditionally approve or deny requests to consume or possess alcoholic beverages in City parks. "b. 1. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.14, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited in Certain Public Places, the Director, or his or her designee, is hereby designated as the person to approve, conditionally approve or deny requests to consume or possess alcoholic beverages at any indoor city public facility. A temporary license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, and proof of one million dollars liquor liability insurance coverage and liability insurance coverage idemifying the city of Temecula as additional insured, is also required for any such permit. 970321 11086-00001 mt 1480417 3 "2. No person under the age of twenty-one is permitted to consume alcoholic beverages in any city park or facility. "3. Security may be required for events in which alcohol is served, depending upon the type of event at the discretion of the Director. Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Special Use Parks. "1. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.14, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited in Certain Public Places, the Director, or his or her designee, is hereby designated as the person to approve, conditionally approve or deny requests to consume or possess alcoholic beverages at a special use park. "2. Alcoholic beverages must be consumed in designated areas. "3. A temporary license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, one million dollars liquor liability insurance and liability insurance identifying the city of Temecula as additional insured is also required for any such permit. "4. No person under the age of twenty-one is permitted to consume alcoholic beverages in any special use park. "5. Security will be required for events in which alcohol is sold, as well as events where alcohol is not served." Section 2. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 3. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. 970321 11086-0(X)01 mt 1480417 - 4 - of PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this , 1997. day Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk 970321 11086-00001 mt 1480417 - 5 ° STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1997 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk 970321 11086-00001 mt 1480417 - 6 - ITEM 16 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Fi~IA.N~E C'TY MANAGER ~:~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager April 22, 1997 TCI Cable PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDATION: The City Council to receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: The City Council has invited TCI Cable to make a presentation to the City Council and general public to discuss pending rate increases, programming concerns and other issues that affect cable television in the Ci,ty. TCI Cable has provided cable service to the residents of Temecula since they bought out Inland Valley Cablevision and assumed the Franchise Agreement in March of 1996. The City's Franchise Agreement with TCl, which expires in 2004, provides the City with the ability to regulate expanded basic cable rates only after they exceed the established ceiling of $34.33 per month. FISCAL IMPACT: None. R~-ANIEKDA~X~EPOK'I'~TAFF43.MI S 4/14~7 ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Council Ron Bradley, City Manager DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Temecula Library PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: This is an information item for Council discussion and direction. DISCUSSION: In December 1996, the City of Riverside put Riverside County on notice that as of July 1, 1997, the City of Riverside will no longer administer the County Library Contract. Effectively, this means that as of July 1, 1997, the County Free Library System (RCCPL), as we have known it, will cease to exist. The primary impact to the Temecula Library in the new fiscal year, based on this action, is a further reduction in County library funding provided to the Temecula Library and a subdivision of the County into three library zones for administration purposes. The Temecula Library Task Force Committee, which has been meeting since September of 1995, has focused recent meeting discussions on the various options facing the Temecula Library. These options, which have been analyzed by David M. Griffith & Associates (DMG) through a Library Study, include the following: Continue to operate as part of the Riverside County Library System Form a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) with neighboring cities for governing purposes Withdraw from the County Library System and form a Library District with neighboring cities Withdraw from the County Library System and establish a municipal library On June 25, 1996, Council approved an appropriation of $95,000 to ensure that the Library would be open for 48 hours per week. This dollar amount, provided to staff by the County, was based on the County's commitment to provide a base service of 32 hours per week and the City funding an additional 16 hours per week. On April 2, 1997, the County informed staff that "pink slips" had been issued throughout the RCCPL, and that the Temecula Library will likely not be open for 48 hour per week during the month of June. A letter was hand delivered to County Administrative Office staff challenging these actions. To date, no response has been received. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time for this action. ITEM 18 YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITFEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS~TO WHICH YOU BE~X)NG: (Professional, technical, community, ~eryic~: t~.~.,,~,~, c',~,~ ' - --,~. '.~-- ('.~,.~.~.~) /~~_ BRIEFLY STATE WIlY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): ,. -~ / / c~/ q . _/ ,-~/ - ~ -? ., ,- /~.., /~/ ,,- ..~ . ~ , ~'..o..-~..,~-,~-.-~','~ ~?../ -~' ,.'-/-' : '--"'--'"-" _ ~ . ._ i// 1 / .// /z //// ./ ,~, . // ~ /./.~-~.dr '2-"-,:m~,,"fOZ,'~~'v'f' --/'/~ .Y"~'~'L ,"/~' "~ ~'-~ ":~'-~ ~ '~ ~'""'< /I und~tand that ]~y or all information on this form m~aay be verified. I consent to the release "o~this information for/pnb-I~nformation purpose. PLEASE NOTE: Appli~t}~ns will ~-kep(oh file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: ,4~ity Clerk'~6ffice, 43200 Bnsine~s Park Drive (909) 694-~??. OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033. Temecula. Ca. 92589-9033 r:\commil~app form.rda APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFF I ~ER~. CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk April 22, 1997 Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Appointment RECOMMENDATION: Appoint a member to serve an unexpired term on the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee. BACKGROUND: Due to the resignation of Rosa Thesing, a vacant position exists on the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee. This position was appointed for a term to expire September 26, 1999. All applications received were forwarded to the subcommittee composed of Councilmember Steve Ford and Chairperson Susie Bridges for their review and recommendation. Both Councilmember Ford and Chairperson Bridges recommend the appointment of Randy Holland to serve for the remainder of the vacant term. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of April 1, 1997. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment CITY OFTEMECULA ' '~ ~f~ 1 ~ ~§'0,? i APPLICATION FOR AP~I~~ TO THE OLD TOWN ~DE~P~ AD~S~~' ~ --_ _ ..... :_ :/~ · · ~.~::::': ....~ ~: '::~ :Bmi~ ~lh~ ~e Old To~ R~e~lo~m Sub.A~a ~ ~. :':"?~ : ' HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER NAME: '- EMPLOYER ADDRESS: - EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: ~ST ~ ~RS~E CO~ OR O~R Cl~ BO~, CO~~E OR 00~SSION ON ~CH YOU ~ SER~D ~ ~ ~(S) OF SER~CE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necec~ary): 5~:~: fry'S/""~'~ 17~--~.~ "~':: " ='" ~'" ~ '~'v I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. SIGNATURF.: '/' ' / - - [ -~ ~'~/~"~'~-'- DATE: PLEASE NOTE~lications will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Cierk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694=~A~. OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033. T®mocula, Ca. 92§89-9033 r: \commis\app form.rda LEANN D. ANDERSON 41800 Cone Valentine Temecula, Ca. 92592 SUMMARY EXPERIENCE 12/92 . Present 2/89- 12/92 1/88- 12/88 A conscientious person with ability to perform in a multifunctional capacity. Experienced with problem solving. Ability to maintain efficiency while dealing with interruptions. Desires cooperative work environment. HOMEMAKER YOKOHAMA TIRE CORPORATION Fullerton, Ca. INVENTORY CONTROL ASSISTANT Responsible for daily inventory from four Nation-Wide wa-~house and distribution centers. Developed monthly spread sheet for product / cost / distribution analysis. Oversee yearly physical inventory of East Coast facility. Responsible for daily allotment of product to specified accounts according to availability. KNAPE & VOGT MANUFACTURING CO. La Mirada, Ca. CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE Handled busy order desk. Extensive daily customer contact. Took order by phone, FAX, and mail. Edit all orders for processing. Expedite.special request orders. Research claims for shortshipments and overshipments. Research order status and inventory, status daily. 10/86 12/88 9/84- 10/86 HOMEMAKERIMOTHER AUDIOVOX CORPORATION Cerritos, Ca. CREDIT CLERK Responsible for processing all claims for credit. This position required thorough knowledge of product line and pricing structure for individual accounts. Worked closely with Sales Managers on promotional/advertising credits. Assisted in other areas of credit department functions such as collections, chargebacks, and typed correspondence. 8/81 1/81 8/78 5/84 8/81 11/80 AUDIOVOX CORPORATION (continued) SALES ORDER DESK Duties: daily phone orders, expedite special order requests, process orders on CRT. Follow-up on all orders/shipments. KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC. Long Beach, Ca. INVENTORY CONTROL ASSISTANT Updated daily equipment status and availability. Worked closely with Long Beach shipping terminals regarding status of ship arrivals and departures. Arranged intermodal shipping contracts with So. Cal. Trucking Companies. Approved billing for accounts payable. Extensive daily phone contact with customers and leasing companies. RICHARD ALLMON CO., INC. Glendale, Ca. SALES ORDER DESK Arranged daily shipment of liquid sweetener to Southern California bottling plants. Such as Coca Cola, 7-UP, etc. Coordinated shipments of product from railroad to dispatch yard. Daily contact with Southern Pacific and Santa Fe railroads to ~'ace incoming cross-country shipments. Process bills of lading for all incoming/outgoing tankers. JUDY'S Plaza Pasadena Pasadena, Ca. ASSISTANT MANAGER Responsible for staff of sixteen. Sales and Cashier training. Fully accountable for daily sales and cash receipts. Process and balance employee sales records Schedule working and lunch hours for staff. Authorized all inter-store garment transfers. Originally hired as member of sales staff. ED UCA TION Pasadena City College Courses completed: · ,Business & Personnel Management · Economics · Marketing Research · Data Processing · Fashion Merchandising · Textile Design · An History CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE OLD TOWN COMMITTEE REDEVELOPME[, t:!.!oualific. ntionRequirement: Resident of the City of TemeculaOid Town ~ or Own~/Ope .Wi!'ofl;!: J . i:.- i .:'::i~-~::!;:'i. i .i · ~ : iBusiness within the Old Town Redevelopment Sub Area Z;'.i.: :' ::; ~:i~ YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA WOR r.o z: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMFUrEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, serwce): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WIS!! TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED F .)R THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if --,%~ ~.y~-~.'~-,'~,_ ~--"~.",~-~-.'~.q, ~.._~- . -'~" ~ x ~ ........... ~. ~ m , - ~. ~- - -, ~ · . ~ ~ --~ I unde~d lh~ ~y or ~1 information on th~ form may ~ veri[ed. l co~e~ to the re~ of info~ion for public informntion pur~. ,.. · V - % t "~, , PE~ NO~: App]~io~ will ~ ke~ on file for '~der~io~f l~e va~ci~.-- Ret~ to: Ci~ Ci~rk's O[ce, 43]~ B~in~ P~k Driv~ (9~) 69~ Mail to: P.O. Box ~033, Tomocula, Ca. r: \commis\app form.rda 43420 Corte Barbaste Temecula, CA 92592 -._.=- - 909-693-2260 -:.:.j/,..~ .' .T~.. ~ .?.~-.-.- Resume' of Qualification Objective: SeeKing a responsible position capable of utilizing my training, experi- ence and skills. Personal Profile: Professionally oriented, set high personal and professional standards for self. Well organized and attentive to details, excell in an environ- ment of responsibility. Qualified by: Eight years experience in job placement and development. Handled 50 to 150 applicants Developed contact with over 200 employers in the business community. Half owner of a permanent employment agency for a 3 year period. Manager of a temporary employment service for a 2year period. Performed all bookkeeping duties and payroll functions. Supervised and trained all personnel. Acted as public speaker for ChamBer of Commerces in area. Conducted employment seminars at educational institutions and local iob fairs. As a franchise owner on call 24~ours per day to all insurance comp..es in ~ne Sacramento area for' c~aning and res~ra~ons d~e ~o. fir~s, floods and vandalism. Handled all duties of self owned company. . Experience: 1983-~me~ Owner D.G. Enterprises P.O. Box 1063 San Diego, CA 92120 Owner of commercial janitorial service. Heavy.sales, training of all ~. .~ employees, bookkeeping duites, taxes, payroll, scheduling of services, ~-, hiring 2nd'.~l~er. mtnating. Purchasing of supplies and inventory. · ~: ' -. Job Developer '= Y Catholic Community Services '-'" 4643 Mission Gorge Place San Diego, CA 92120 .... '~Dev~li~per for all refugees entering the San Di.e~o area (this was a '-'l~edera~. job on a 1 year grant only). Counseled refug~e~ from countries as to appropriate job' seeking skills. Dir. ected refug~ ~.o their programs wit)~ community training and provided counselin~ ,nd ~uppor._t.as neeoed. Assisted refugees with transportation to job inter- ~iews and assiste'o refugees with employment applications. Established ~:~employer contact within the San Diego and Orange Co. a~'ea in search of job opportunicies. ~.980-82 1978-80 1975-77 1970-75 Education: Hobbies: Resume' of Oualification Page 2 Manager Volt Temporary Services 785 University Avenue La Mesa, CA 92021 Acted as manager of temporary employment service. Responsible for training all office personnel and marketing. Devised preemployment testing measures. Handled five employees in areas of job development. Maintained all job applicant and employment files. Did job order projections for coming year. Performed payroll, bookkeeping and personnel functions. Conducted employ- ment seminars at educational facilities, job fairs and different branches of the San Diego Chambers of Con~nerce. Made direct contact with approxi- mately 150 employers within the San Diego and surrounding area. Purchasing Agent Reuland Electric Co. 10081 Railroad Avenue City of Industry, CA Started as office manager, typist, phones, customer service, inventory control and shipping and receiving. Became Purchasing Agent for sixteen months, then private purchasing agent for R&D engineers. Hal f Owner Servpro of Auburn 1042 Nancy Way Aubu: n, C,~ Half owner of Servpro Franchise dealing in custom cleaning of carpets, draperies and upholstery. Conducted seminars in proper use of equipment and marketing for other franchise owners. Responsible for supervision and training of four employees. Performed bookkeeping, banking, inventory, buying, payroll and all personnel functions. Made direct contact with approximately 200 customers in the Auburn, Tahoe, Sacramento area. Respon- sible for tripling the business in a 3 month period. On call 24 hours a day to all insurance companies in area for restoration Sue to fires, floods and vandalism. Only woman franchise dealer in the U.S. and Canada. Employment Counselor Polaris Personnel Agency 224 Arden Way Sacramento, CA 95824 Placement counselor for 2 years before becoming half owner. Handled 50-100 applicants. Developed direct contact with approximately 150 employers. Maintained files on all applicants and employers. Responsible for placement of all Employment. Fullerton Jr. College, Fullerton, CA One and a half years - Management and Psychology major. Board of Directors, Chamber of Con~nerce, Auxiliary Member Little League, Civil Affairs. References: Available upon request APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT [:-: ' :' .':::' ";'i '?;i ::.: ? :': '. ::Business within lhe Old Town Redevelopmere Sub Area HOME PHONE: ~)0 ~' c)_.~'- 1~:2~ WORK PHONE: E~~ N~: E~~R ~D~S: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RFVF. RSH)E COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITWEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO ~[[HCH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED F.F~OR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC COs~ additional pa~r if . ._~- 0 necks'y): / 7% / I I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. PLEASE NOTE: Applications will be kept'on ~ie }o; ~/nsideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Pm'k Drive (909) 694=~.4~. 0/9 Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 5 r: \comm~s\app form.rda Biographical Sketch Alfonso B. Perez General: Alfonso B. Perez lives at 28231 Sycamore Mesa Road, Temecula, California with his wife, Celia E. Perez a former elementary school teacher. They have four daughters; Irene, Diane, Armida and Lydia and nine grandchildren. Education: Graduate of Roosevelt High School where he participated in student government and starred in track. Earned his A.A. Degree from Los Angeles City College, B.A. Degree from Occidental College and M..S. Degree from USC. His master's Thesis "A Handbook for Teachers of Handicapped Children" was later published as a teacher's guide by the Los Angeles City Schools. Military Experience: Entered service as a private in 1941, was commi,~ioned a 2rid Lt. a year later and was sent overseas where he served with 'dmtinction as a Bombardlet in a heavy bomber group. Received the Presidential Unit Citation, Air Medal with Cluster, and the Distinguished Ft~ng Cross with Cluster. Competed his military career as an intelligence Officer in the Air Force Reserve with the rank of Lt. Colonel.. Professional & Commnnity Organizations: He is past president of the Los Angeles Council for Exceptional Children, past president, Roosevelt Alumni Association, member, Los Angeles County Administrators of Special Education, California School Boards Association, California Associatiom Educators of Mexican Descent, Association California School Administrators, past president USC Mexican-American Alumni Association. He is past president of The board Of Directors of Fiesta Educativa, Inc., an organization committed to help Hispanic parents of developmentally disabled children. Comm.nity Activities: Mr. Perez is very interested and active in projects concerned with the educational status of Mexican-American children. He was chairman of a committee formed to develop a state-wide organization of educators of Mexican descent. In 1965, he was elected to the Board of Education of the Montebello Unified School District with the largest plurality of votes received in a field of 15 candidates. He was re- elected in 1969 and served as President of the Montebello Board of Education for the 1969-70. In 1966, he was named to serve on the Advisory Committee of the South West Regional Laboratory, a Tri-State Educational Research Project. In 1967, he was presented with an Honorary Life Membership by the Montebello Chapter of PTA. Governor Ronald Reagan appointed him in 1969 to serve on the California Advisory Council for Vocational Education and in 1970 Mayor Sam Yorty appointed him as Commissioner in the City Demonstration Agency "Model Cities" Board. Professional Experience: Started teaching career in 1947 at Pacific Blvd. School and subsequently moved on Harlan Shoemaker School and Widne¥ High School, all schools for the handi- capped. In 1956, he became the first Mexican-American to be named a Secondary Principal in the Los Angeles City School System. He was assigned to administer Widney High School where he had responsibility for coordinating an educational program serving nearly 1,500 handicapped children. As Principal of Widney High, School, he was responsible for initiating plans and assisting in the design of a new Widney High School for the handicapped. It was completed in 1967 and in 1969 it was cited as the outstanding school of its type in the country! He is considered an expert in teaching the handicapped and has taught classes related to exceptional children at California State University, Los Angeles, UCLA, and Cal-Lutheran University. In February, 1970, he was assigned to the Principalship of Roosevelt High School, his alma-mater, at a time when the school was involved in very serious student activism and community corrfi'ontafon. Within a year, he was able to bring about peace on the campus and to gain the acceptance of most elements of the community, the staff. and the student body. In December of 1975, he was promoted to the position of Superintendent, Administrative Area H, a predominantly Me~dean-Ameriean community. This area is compose of 51 schools and an enrollment of approximately 35,000 students. On July 1, 1977, he was named to head the Los Angeles Unified School District's Division of Special Education which administers programs for the District's approximate 57,000 handicapped students, the second largest special education program in the country. On June 1980, he retired from the Los Angels Unified School District after serving for 33 years as a teacher and administrator. Soon after retirement, On August of 1980. California Lutheran College assigned him as Liaison for Graduate Programs in Education of their Los Angels Center Office. In February of 1981 he was appointed as a consultant for Region XVI (Los Angeles) of the Association of California School Administrators - ACSA. April 1982, appointed Executive Director of the Board of Directors of the United States Academic Decathlon, an Association dedicated towards motivating high school students towards academic excellence through a concept of Academic Competition patterned after the Olympic Athletic Decathlon. May 1982, a school for mentally retarded children located in East Los Angeles was dedicated as THE AI FONSO Fl. PEREZ SPF. CIAI, EDUCATION CENTER in recognition of his 33 years of service as an educator in the L. A. School District. May 1983, California Lutheran College awarded him an Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree in recognition of his many contributions to education. ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN,A~E, CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director April 22, 1997 "Billboard Free" Zone Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING A 'BILLBOARD FREE" ZONE IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ITS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BACKGROUND On April 13, 1993, the Temecula City Council found it necessary to establish an ordinance which would prohibit Outdoor Advertising Displays. It was determined at that time that the approval of any further sign location plans, plot plans, or other discretionary entitlements for Outdoor Advertising Displays would result in an immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare of persons and properties within the City of Temecula Change of Zone 6278 was recently filed with the Riverside County Planning Department. This Change of Zone is located within the City's Sphere of Influence and would allow Outdoor Advertising Displays. At the March 18, 1997 City Council Meeting, the Council directed staff to prepare a resolution requesting a "Billboard Free" zoning for the property included in Change of Zone 6278. FISCAL IMPACT N\A Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 97- - Page 2 R:\STAFFRPT'tBft.I_I~OAR.CC 4/9/97 klb 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:\STAFFRPT~BILLBOAR.CC 4/9/97 klb 2 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING A "BH.,LBOARD FREE" ZONE IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ITS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, The City Council is concerned about the maintenance of the visual aesthetic quality of the City of Temecula, and with the creation of an orderly and balanced development scheme within the City of Temecula; and W/~REAS, Ordinance 93-09 was adopted which prohibits Outdoor Advertising Displays; and WHEREAS, Change of Zone 6278 was filed with the Riverside County Planning Department; and WHEREAS, Change of Zone 6278 is located on property contained within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence; and WHEREAS, Change of Zone 6278 will permit Outdoor Advertising Displays; NOW, T[IEREFORE be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the Riverside County Board of Supervisors designate the area between the San Diego County line and the Temecula City Limits along Interstate 15 as a "Billboard Free" Zone and prohibit Outdoor Advertising Displays in Change of Zone 6278. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of April 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:~ST~II_/_~OAR.CC 4/1119'/klb 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVEP~IDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96-m was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 199m by the following vote, to wit: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:~STAFFRPTLBrI' .1ROAR,CC 4/11/9'7 klb 4 ITEM 20 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC,,TO~R, =,~)~ CITY MANAG ER~/'~. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 Ordinance 97- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: ~ All Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010Id) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE (3) MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (5) JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS BACKGROUND: Engineering and traffic surveys have been conducted to update the posted speed limits on the roadway segments as shown on Exhibit "A". Section 40803 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, an engineering and traffic survey must be conducted within a five (5) year period. An engineering and traffic survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. Based on analysis of the recent data, staff recommends that the existing speed limits remain the same and be re- affirmed by the City Council. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed the new engineering and traffic surveys and recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code to re-affirm the existing speed limits as shown on Exhibit "A". -1 - r:kagd rpt\97~O422\~pdlimit .ord/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Exhibit UAW - Affected Roadway Segments 2. Ordinance 97- 3. Exhibit "Bw, Location Maps -2- r:~agdrpt\97\O422\spdlimit.ord/ajp EXHIBIT 'A' "Name of Street and Portion Affected Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road Del Rey Road (entire length) Via Norte (entire length) Moraga Road between Rancho California Road and Margarita Road Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and State Route 79 South Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and North City Limits Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit. Miles Per Hour 45 35 35 40 45 50 -3- r:~agdrpt\97~O422\spdlimlt.ord/ajp ORDINANCE 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TF. MECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCtiF_~TER ROAD (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE (3) MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND MARGARITA ROAD (4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (5) JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula f'mds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limit; WIIEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance indicate that the speed limit should remain the same and, therefore, the intent of the Council is to re-affirm the speed limits given the new engineering and traffic study. -4- r:~agdrpfi97\O422\~pdlimit.ord/ajp SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby mended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed l Jimit. Miles Per Hour Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road 45 Del Rey Road (entire length) 35 Via Notre (entire length) 35 Moraga Road between Rancho California Road and Margarita Road 40 Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and State Route 79 South 45 Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and North City Limits 50 Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 00) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. -5- r:kagdrpt\97\O422\spdlimit.ord/ajp SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of~ ,1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-__ was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of April, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk -6- r:\agdrpfi97\O422\spdlimit.ord/ajp II CT VIA NORTE ~?TSouBRA DEL REY ROAD #lOw,I, EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP WA A ROAD }~]11~111111[1111lllllltl~l IIIII1~1'- MORAGA~__-~ ~ ROAD - VISTA EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP PAUBA ROAD ," RANCHO CALIFORNIA ) ~.~ '~ ~ ~- ,'~' RANCHO ~STA ROA~::~',~ ,//~, EXHIBIT "B" HIGHWAY 79 S. LOCATION MAP ~EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP ITEM 21 - APPROVA?. CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director April 22, 1997 Approval of 1996-97 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 97- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET DISCUSSION: Each year the City conducts a mid-year review of its operating budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Both, Human Resources and Finance Department staff have performed an analysis of projected personnel costs. All City departments have reviewed their operating budgets and have identified any material adjustments required. The mid-year budget review includes the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and the Internal Service Funds. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Summary of Revenues. Fxl;)enditures. and Fund Balance: Presents a summary of prior year and 1996-97 year-to-date actual activity, as well as 1996-97 current and proposed budget amounts. Also included is a schedule of beginning and estimated ending fund balance based upon the proposed budget activity. Revenue Detail: Presents detail of prior year and 1996-97 year-to date revenues, as well as the 1996-97 current and revised projected revenues. Fxpenditure ! ine-ltem Detail: Presents expenditure line item detail by department for prior year and year-to date actual activity, as well as the 1996-97 current and proposed budget amounts. ~;N!=RAI FUNn Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the General Fund fund balance at June 30, 1997 is projected to be $14,467,624. Proposed expenditures exceed projected revenues by $2,694,360 for the 1996-97 fiscal year. This current year deficit is due primarily to the City's commitment to spend almost $3.3 million from the General Fund towards Temecula's Capital Improvement Program (primarily for the Rancho California Interchange project). In looking just at ongoing operating revenues and expenditures in the General Fund (that is, not considering the impact of the capital project expenditures), it is projected that the General Fund will incur an operating surplus of $594,527 in 1996-97. The projected General Fund revenues reflect a $1,268,522 or 8% increase over the original budget estimate. This increase is an indication of the strong performance and growth of the local economy, with significant increases projected in the revenue estimates for sales tax, community development fees, and investment interest. Proposed General Fund expenditure adjustments reflect a net increase of $371,112 from the current budget. The material expenditure adjustments requested are as follows: All Del~artments: Sui~l~ort Services ¢Col~y Center) Allocation: A $47,786 total increase is reflected throughout the various operating departments in the General Fund due to the increased costs associated with Xerox equipment acquired early this fiscal year. City Attorney: A $125,000 increase is requested due primarily to increased development-related activity. Planning: An increase in project employee help of $22,420 is requested, as is an increase of $25,000 for contract landscape review services. Building & Safety: A $46,000 increase in contract plan check services is requested. Fngineering. Public Works. and CIP Admin: A $91,370 decrease in personnel costs is recommended, due to several positions which were unfilled for a portion of the fiscal year. Police: A budget transfer of $35,000 is requested for booking fees due to the increased number of arrests being made by the Police Department which require jail bookings. Another budget transfer of $90,000 is requested to record the cost of one police officer that is partially funded by the COPS FAST federal grant in a separate line item. The cost of this officer was included with the cost of other sworn officers in the original budget. Fire: A $128,132 increase is required in the Fire Services line item due to an adjustment in the Structural Fire Tax offset. This increase is partially offset by a $30,000 reduction in Other Outside Services. nAS TAX FUNn No changes are proposed to Gas Tax Fund revenue or expenditure estimates. 2 INTI=RNA~ -~I=RVIC; FUNrI.~ A $66,626 increase in Internal Service Funds revenues from the current budget estimate is projected in the Support Services (Copy Center) Fund. In total, a net increase in total Internal Service Funds expenditures of $63,549 is proposed. Significant appropriation increases are as follows: Insurance Fund: An increase of $16,600 is requested for claims administrator costs due to an increase in claims activity. Inform;tion Systems Fund: An increase of $16,107 in personnel costs is requested to fund an Information System Analyst position. An increase of $18,500 is requested for telephone system, computer software, and supplies costs. A capital outlay request of $8,000 is included for a stand alone business license software program. Support .~ervices Fund: An increase of $4,000 in project help is requested for part-time City Hall reception coverage. AUTHORITFD POSITIONS No changes are proposed to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. However, funding is included in the proposed mid-year budget for the Development Processing Coordinator and Information System Analyst positions that were approved by the City Council on March 18, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed mid-year adjusted budget reflects a net increase of $371,112 from the current budget estimate in the projected General Fund fund balance at June 30, 1997. Attachments: Resolution No. 97- 1996-97 General Fund Mid-Year Budget 1996-97 Gas Tax Fund Mid-Year Budget 1996-97 Internal Service Funds Mid-Year Budget 3 RESOLSON NO. 9% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF. L'ULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of City operating budgets. WHEREAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. ~, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules for the City's General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and Internal Service Funds. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1996-97 General Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with the attached General Fund Mid-Year Budget. Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1996-97 Gas Tax Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with the attached Gas Tax Fund Mid-Year Budget. Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1996.97 Internal Service Funds Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Internal Service Funds Mid-Year Budget. PASSED, APPROVEF} AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April, 1997. ATI~ST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFO~) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMEC~) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk for the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of April, 1997, by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILNn=~MBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET GENERAL FUND Cn'Y OF TEMECULA ~RY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE ~__.~ERAL FUND 1996-97 (MID-YEAR) 96-97 96-97 96-97 Proposed 95-96 YTD Current Proposed Increase Actual* ~ 12/31196 Budget Budget (Decrease) Total General Fund Revenues 17.155.038 8.512.084 15,869.847 17.138.369 1.268.522 General Fund Expenditures by Dept: City Council 341,809 270,689 439,716 461.412 City Manager 453,918 247,244 519,726 539.490 City Clerk 347.610 226,797 520,791 527.077 City Attorney 238,456 186,507 260,000 385,000 Finance 708,961 360,252 778,298 811.372 Human Resources 258,357 136,382 289,295 310,068 Planning 948,914 443,343 1,019,872 1,068,751 Building & Safety 820.038 504.886 954,743 1.015,545 Engineering 531,286 337,118 843,281 781,864 Public Works 1.712,410 1.029.233 2,141,493 2.133.943 ClP Admin 525.879 321,634 672.133 650.969 Police 4,134,539 2,009,666 5,067,580 5.073,580 Fire 1,391.688 663,187 1.466.968 1,565,354 ,Animal Control 58,066 19,654 60.000 55,000 Oepartmental 822~355 195,334 938,834 949,834 ~,'ating Transfers Out: Capital Projects 2.093.100 251,316 3.288,887 3.288,887 TCSD 16,574 Insurance Fund 400.000 200.000 200.000 200,000 Information Systems Fund 200.000 CDBG 14.583 Total General Fund Expenditures 16.003.960 7.403.242 19.461.617 19.832.729 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 21.696 19.764 6.286 125,000 33.074 20,773 48.879 60.802 (61,417) (7,55o) (21,164) 6,000 98,386 (5,000) 11,000 14.583 371.112 1,151,078 1,108,842 (3,591,770) (2,694,360) 897,410 Fund Balance. Beg. of Year Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance. End of Year 16,010.906 17.155,038 (16.003.960) 17.161.984 17.161.984 17,138,369 (19.832.729) 14.467.624 ' Restated to be consistent with 96-97 Gas Tax revenues/Public Works expenditures treatment. mcdermt~midyear~del:)tsum.wb2 03-~r-97 ACCT NO DEPT DEPT DEPT DEPT 4076 DEPT 4055 4067 4125 4044 4060 4083 DEPT 4036 4037 DEPT 4010 4012 4013 4014 4016 ,4018 4020 4022 4024 4028 4032 4033 4045 4046 4047 4052 4053 4O56 4057 4060 4061 4062 4065 4066 4070 4075 4076 4077 4082 4083 4090 OO1 GENERAL FUND 161 PLANNING -Various 162 BUILDING -Vadous 163 ENGINEERING -Vadous 164 CIP -Reimbursements 170 POLICE -Parking Citations -Vehicle impound Fees -Temporary Outdoor Event -Asset Forfeiture -Miscellaneous -Grants (COPS Fast. SCAIR) 171 FiRE -Fire Plan Check -Fire Inspection 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL -Property Tax -Property Tax (Unsecured) -Supplemental Tax - AB 2345 -Supplemental Tax- SB 813 -Property Transfer Tax -Franchise Fees -Transient Occupancy Tax -Interest & Penalties -Sales and Use Tax -Homeowner Property Tax Relief -Candidate Filing Fees -SBE Apportionments -Off Road Vehicle In Lieu -Motor Vehicle in Lieu -Vehicle Code Fines -Tipping Fees -Bids & Proposals -Business Licenses -Promotional Materials -Miscellaneous Non Taxable -Retumed Check Fee -Recovery of Pdor Year Expense -Investment Interest -Loan Interest -Cash Over & Short -Rental income -Reimbursements (CFD 88-12) -Community Services Dist~ct -Redevelopment Agency -Capital Improvement Program -Operating Transfers-in TOTAL GENERAL FUND GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAIL FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 YTD ~. 12/31196 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT 202,366 146,833 182,243 1,346,488 698,558 1,291,000 714,331 704,565 508,000 800 30,585 15,570 1,609 12,539 61,948 28,286 14,895 1,510 4,785 103,561 30,000 15,000 1,000 10,000 30,000 53,304 34,408 37,489 18,808 45,000 30,000 1,075,379 65,506 2,032 185,143 994,978 675,445 7,782,011 32,832 302 640 1,481,823 58,537 16,249 138,915 26,722 280 7,855 808,016 4,863 36 65,230 162,000 75,000 243,596 778,501 17,155,039 346,096 49,624 44,524 79,994 315,905 375,3O7 4,006,036 364 50 425 761,649 18,089 2,595 28,665 6,145 210 14,828 459,399 554 182 81,000 37,500 122,853 8.512,084 1,076,450 60,000 150,000 920,000 630,000 7,190,000 33,000 1,459,315 55,000 13,000 140,000 20,000 600,000 60,000 162,000 75,000 329,628 754,211 15,869,847 Y'rD % OF BDGT 80.57% 54.11% 138.69% 94.29% 99.30% 151.00% 47.85% 345.20% 83.31% 62.69% 32.15% 82.71% 53.33% 34.34% 59.57% 55.72% 1.10% 52.19% 32.89% 19.96% 20.48% 30.73% 76.57% 50.00% 50.00% 37.27% 53.64% FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT 200,000 1,291,000 850,000 30,000 15,000 1,000 6,000 10,000 127,393 45,000 30,000 1,076,450 60,000 150,000 960,000 650,000 7,900,000 33,000 1,459,315 55,000 13,000 140,000 20,000 725,000 60,000 162,000 75,000 240,000 754,211 17,138,369 CHANGE IN BDGT 17,757 342,000 6,000 97,393 40,000 20,000 710,000 125,000 (89,628) 1,268,522 mcdermt~rtidyear~97rev,wq 1 31 -Mar-97 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5116 5118 5119 5120 15121 ~5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND CITY COUNCIL-DEPARTMENT 100 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 23,166 11,661 18,000 18,000 2,685 1,000 2,710 2,710 556 245 261 261 11,500 6,000 12,000 12,000 499 255 1,280 199 756 756 324 166 888 295 371 371 12,414 6, :329 28,860 28,800 1,952 1,138 6,255 3,187 473 200 946 494 62,938 31,169 62,958 62,898 (60) (60) R:~ICDE R M'r~IDYEAR~97MY-100.WB2 03/28 17:53 CiTY COUNCIL-DEPARTMENT 100 ACCT NO. 5208 5214 5220 5222 5226 5228 5230 5248 5250 5254 5258 5260 5261 5262 5265 5267 5280 5285 5330 5340 5345 5350 5610 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TELEPHONE SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT-VEHICLES OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES ADVERTISING CONFERENCES PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE RECOGNITION PROGRAM COMMUNITY SERVICES FUNDING SISTER CITIES COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL CITY COUNCIL FY 95-96 ACTUALS 2,746 1,736 1,992 19,543 187 1,500 25,238 1,455 20,621 4,814 389 167 5,060 105,000 9,015 14,500 14,516 23,984 7,500 18,908 278,871 341,80g FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 695 1,322 291 18,166 58 119 1,500 12,037 269 5,969 2,131 7,059 71,250 5,391 73,972 9,437 4,050 14,086 11,718 239,520 270,689 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 2,950 2,300 1,388 21,100 100 250 1,500 22,200 500 17,562 6,000 7,600 105,000 9,000 101,000 18,791 8,839 23,781 26,897 376,758 439,716 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 2,950 2,300 1,388 21,100 100 250 1,500 30,200 500 19,562 6,000 7,600 105,000 9,000 101,000 18,791 8,839 35,537 26,897 398,514 461,412 PAGE 2 INCREA. (DECREA§E} 8,000 2,000 11,756 21,756 21,696 4 R:~VICDERMT~M I DYEAR~97MY.100.WB2 03128 17:53 ACCT NO. ~5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 ~ 5112 5113 5114 5116 5117 5118 ! 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND CITY MANAGER-DEPARTMENT 110 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 279,715 140,811 289,474 289,483 41,644 20,437 43,583 43,585 2 4,118 2,204 4,303 4,303 2,400 1,200 2,400 2,400 414 204 1,319 61 1,470 1,470 2,384 1,181 2,116 855 1,701 1,701 12,821 3,765 23,088 23,040 (48) 2,054 902 720 360 200 59 1,274 2,230 2,378 978 2,000 6,070 4,070 3,399 3,379 6,000 7,000 1,000 128 132 263 263 639 290 250 300 50 374,532 357.723 179,048 379,615 5,083 5 97MY-110.WB2 03/31 15:17 CITY MANAGER-DEPARTMENT 110 PAGE 2 ACCT ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION 5200 OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5208 TELEPHONE SERVICE 5214 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES 5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5222 PRINTING 5223 TEMECULA ONE 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5228 PUBLICATIONS 5230 POSTAGE & PACKAGING 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5254 ADVERTISING 5258 CONFERENCES 5260 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS 5261 STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION 5262 MILEAGE 5263 FUEL EXPENSE 5278 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 5330 INSURANCE 5335 VEHICLES 5340 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5345 SUPPORT SERVICES 5350 FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5601 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 5610 EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTALCITYMANAGER FY 95-96 ACTUALS 1,829 668 1,635 437 2,846 2.258 1,125 1,479 12,048 2,020 · 8,468 2,856 2.921 359 891 79 11,612 2,348 19,188 6,000 15,128 96.195 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREA~ AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 669 2,500 2.500 193 2,500 2,500 1,403 2,209 2,209 1,135 2,725 2.725 2,604 5,000 5,000 1,764 3,131 3,131 858 1.000 1,000 961 1,900 4,900 3,000 100 100 22,915 36,621 40,621 4,000 455 500 2,500 2.000 200 400 400 2,234 5,619 5.619 1,028 2,800 2,800 55 3,000 3,000 23 300 300 527 1,200 1,200 94 1,000 1,000 7,550 15,033 15,033 1,521 1.970 2,982 1,012 6,872 22,573 22,573 5,668 9,676 14,345 4,669 9.467 23,437 23,437 68.196 145,194 159,875 14,681 453,918 247,244 519,726 539,490 19,764 97MY-110.WB2 04103 14:35 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5116 5117 5118 r5119 512O 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DIS,~.BI LITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND CITY CLERK-DEPARTMENT 120 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 177.290 103.132 212.598 208.271 (4,327) 24.647 14.257 32,009 31,357 (652) 2.842 1.730 3,267 3.319 52 2.400 1.200 2.400 2.400 535 306 2.329 297 2.299 2.457 158 1.596 918 1.366 638 1.292 1.312 20 8,814 5.829 31.746 31.680 (66) 1.209 667 720 360 434 217 47 272 1.000 1.000 17.419 8,912 12.740 20.000 7.260 654 348 478 750 272 93 244 600 600 311 155 242,706 139,482 299,829 303.146 3,317 R :~MC DE RMT~MIDYEARL97MY-120.WB2 03/28 18:14 CITY CLERK-DEPARTMENT 120 ACCT NO. 5208 5210 5217 5220 5222 5225 5226 5228 5230 5242 5244 5250 5254 5256 5258 5260 5261 5262 5277 5330 5340 5345 5350 5610 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TELEPHONE SERVICE MESSSENGER REPAIR & MAINT-OFF. EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING ELECTION COSTS DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT SIGNS OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES ADVERTISING PUBLIC NOTICES CONFERENCES PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE RECORDS MANAGEMENT INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL CITY CLERK FY 95-96 ACTUALS 562 2,545 172 600 1,908 4,401 2,020 1,912 1,766 6,576 2,070 387 1,673 384 17,452 28,784 9,000 22,692 104,904 347, 610 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 215 3,862 542 25,839 140 1,075 1,805 842 539 762 1,988 245 144 1,001 13 3,686 10,381 16,271 4,982 12,983 87,315 226,797 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 700 200 69 6,900 1,331 68,500 840 2,2O0 4,000 1,819 2,500 7,250 1,000 4,5O0 1,000 700 4,400 2O0 12,904 20,670 33,995 9,512 33,945 219,135 1,827 1,827 520,791 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 7OO 2O0 69 6,900 1,331 68,500 84O 2,200 4,OO0 1,819 2,500 7,250 1,000 4,5O0 1,000 70O 4,400 2O0 12,904 20,670 33,995 12,481 33,945 222,104 1,827 1,827 527,077 PAGE 2 INCRE~. _ (DECREASE) 2,969 2,969 6.286 R:~CDER MT~MIDYEAR~97MY- 120.WB2 8 03/28 18:14 GENERAL FUND CITY ATTORNEY-DEPARTMENT 130 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET ACCT NO. 5246 5247 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES LEGAL SERVICES-CONTRACT LEGAL SERVICES-H.R. FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 235,567 184,198 250,000 375,000 2,889 2,309 10,000 10,000 125,000 TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY 238,456 186,507 260,000 385,000 125,000 R :~ICDER MT~Vll DYEAR~97MY-130.WB2 03128 18:19 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND FINANCE-DEPARTMENT 140 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 359,012 180,608 344,928 354,809 9,881 49,880 24,988 55,471 55,152 (319) 5,349 2,926 5,596 5,645 49 2,400 1,200 2,400 3,000 600 966 485 3,092 321 2,940 2,940 3,049 1,526 2,571 1,084 2,213 2,232 19 6,313 3,459 51,948 51,840 (108) 773 428 2,269 1,478 386 203 10,983 5,507 4,171 3,922 24,300 24,300 7,016 9,992 16,000 21,000 5,000 256 390 600 788 188 1,457 1,190 1,500 2,000 500 459,943 239,707 507,896 523,706 15,810 10 R :\MC DE R M3'~IIDYEAR 197MY- 140.WB2 03128 18'41 FINANCE-DEPARTMENT 140 PAGE 2 ~;T ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTiON/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5208 TELEPHONE SERVICE 5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5222 PRINTING 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5228 PUBLICATIONS 5230 POSTAGE & PACKAGING 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5254 ADVERTISING 5258 CONFERENCES 5260 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS ~ STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION b262 MILEAGE 5330 INSURANCE 5340 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5345 SUPPORT SERVICES 5350 FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5601 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 5610 EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTALFINANCE FYg~96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 754 338 1,000 1,000 5,426 2,793 5,073 5,073 14,706 15,907 19,200 19,200 903 595 1,120 1,120 456 262 755 755 5,756 4,472 7,000 8,500 1,500 1,671 3,097 3,097 89,330 18,942 80,076 85,076 5,000 2,462 2,737 4,040 4,040 30 401 500 500 2,160 1,500 1,500 698 143 700 700 2,738 2,876 7,500 7,500 275 167 600 600 27,580 16,987 33,823 33,823 45,572 23,142 51,264 51,264 14,248 11.232 17,876 28,640 10,764 35,928 17,880 35,278 35,278 249,022 120,545 270,402 287,666 17,264 708,965 360,252 778,298 811,372 33,074 11 R:~ICDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-140.WB2 03/28 18:4~ ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5199 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES BENEFITS ADVANCED TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES CITY OF TEMECULA HUMAN RESOURCES-DEPARTMENT 150 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31196 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 127,813 67,331 132,514 132,471 17,551 9,357 19,951 1,860 1,078 2.028 1.200 311 153 1.025 61 1,176 1,095 542 903 405 802 17,316 2.090 1,440 581 301 2,869 1,037 321 833 3,399 3,379 128 132 314 46 2,000 5,250 263 350 160,260 71 87,366 181,650 19,945 2.027 2,400 1,176 802 17,280 5,570 7,000 263 350 189,284 (43) (6) (1) 2,400 (36) 3,570 1,750 7,634 12 E:~IC DE RMT~IIDYEAR~7MY-150.WB2 03/28 18:49 HUMAN RESOURCES-DEPARTMENT 150 PAGE 2 NO. 5208 5220 5222 5226 5228 5230 5242 5248 5250 5254 5258 5259 5261 5262 5265 5330 5340 5345 5350 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TELEPHONE SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES ADVERTISING CONFERENCES TUITION REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE RECOGNITION PROGRAM INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES FY 95-96 ACTUALS 923 1,040 951 1,169 682 1,462 140 22,169 9,677 3,636 22O 3,175 3,045 2,696 600 7,568 8,708 14,392 4,500 11,344 98,097 258,357 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 446 115 967 336 493 1,215 5,469 4,589 4,897 587 415 94 56 7,914 5,662 5,154 3,654 6,953 49,016 136,382 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 80O 72O 1,480 1,600 75O 1,700 935 16,000 9,665 7,000 750 4,000 4,800 1,500 750 9,250 11,274 11,422 6,232 17,017 107,645 289,295 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 800 72O 1,480 1,600 750 2,700 935 21,000 9,665 10,000 750 4,O00 4,800 1,500 750 10,250 11.274 11,422 9,371 17,017 120,784 310,068 INCREASE (DECREASE) 1.000 5,000 3,000 1,000 3,139 13,139 20,773 13 R:~VlCDERMT~MI DYEAR~97MY-150.WB2 03/28 18:4.c ACCT ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 5100 SALARIES & WAGES 5101 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 5102 RETIREMENT 5104 MEDICARE 5106 AUTO ALLOWANCE 5108 LIFE INSURANCE 5109 UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX 5110 DISABILITY INSURANCE 5112 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 5113 HEALTH INSURANCE 5114 DENTAL INSURANCE 5115 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 5116 VISION INSURANCE 5117 CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT 5118 TEMPORARY HELP 5119 PART-TIME (Project) 5120 PART-TIME RETIREMENT 5121 OVERTIME WAGES 5126 COMPENSATED ABSENCES 5190 LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND PLANNING-DEPARTMENT 161 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 473,733 208,105 451,709 448.175 (3,534) 70,911 29,821 68,973 67.477 (1.496) 7,279 3,714 7,471 7,651 180 2.400 1,200 2,400 2,400 1,153 498 4,001 794 4,493 6,560 2,067 4,256 1,888 11,288 4.228 9,018 9.989 971 34.129 17,588 58,293 58,176 (117) 4.717 2.291 1,449 374 1.508 619 3.276 5.408 8,820 11,400 14,000 2,600 30.339 30,276 52.580 75.000 22.420 1.117 1.297 1.971 2,813 842 733 1,623 4,500 4,500 633 238 658,330 313,374 672,808 696.741 23.933 14 R:WICDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-161 .WB2 03~8 19-0; PLANNING-DEPARTMENT 161 PAGE 2 .T ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5208 TELEPHONE SERVICE 5214 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES 5217 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE-EQUIP 5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5222 PRINTING 5224 LEGAL DOCUMENTS/MAPS 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5228 PUBLICATIONS 5230 POSTAGE & PACKAGING 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES '~J PUBLIC NOTICES .~8 CONFERENCES 5260 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS 5261 STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION ~ 5262 MILEAGE 5263 FUEL EXPENSE-CITY VEHICLES 5272 PLANNING COMMISSION 5330 INSURANCE 5335 VEHICLES 5340 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5345 SUPPORT SERVICES 5350 FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 616 172 850 850 245 6OO 600 100 100 4,399 2,202 5,100 5,100 3,439 1,938 4,300 4,300 1,146 292 1,000 500 (500) 2,440 1,557 2,450 2,450 749 343 800 800 5,211 3,498 7,000 7,000 719 404 1,100 1,100 54,409 7,724 82,617 82,617 26,390 28,919 45,198 70,199 25,001 7,281 2,278 11,500 8,500 (3,000) 8,426 1,347 5,220 5,220 1.121 728 1,700 1,700 9,700 10 7,700 6,700 (1,000) 1,353 228 900 900 149 800 800 2,122 5,000 5,000 34,840 19,063 37,957 37,957 3,208 1,160 3,168 1,808 (1,360) 57,565 24,860 55,071 55,071 18,000 12,072 24,699 30,504 5,805 45,380 20,780 42,234 42,234 288,514 129,969 347,064 372,010 24,946 15 E:~ICDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-161 .WB2 03/28 19:07 PLANNING-DEPARTMENT 161 ACCT NO. 5601 5602 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE FURNISHINGS OFFICE EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OU'I LAY FY 95-96 ACTUALS 2,070 2,070 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 FY 9~97 CURRENT BDGT FY96-97 PROPOSED BDGT PAGE 3 INCRE~ (DECREASE) TOTAL PLANNING 948,914 443,343 1,019,872 1,068,751 48,879 16 R:~MCDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-161 .WB2 03129 14:17 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND BUILDING & SAFETY-DEPARTMENT 162 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 376,955 194,828 391,601 403,414 11,813 54,620 27,938 62,343 60,738 (1,605) 5,577 3,198 6,006 5,960 (46) 2,400 1,200 2,400 2,400 1,003 510 3,336 298 2,940 3,255 315 3,536 1,822 8,327 3,804 7,146 7,204 58 24,442 12,332 57,720 57,600 (120) 3,809 2,254 1,686 1,195 885 501 5,206 2,500 11,329 17,740 40,570 40,570 2,240 14,682 31,720 31,720 84 550 281 281 53 324 700 600 (100) 258 112 505,746 285,788 603,146 613,742 10,596 17 R:~ICDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-162.WB2 03~28 19:17 BUILDING & SAFETY-DEPARTMENT 162 ACCT NO. 5208 5214 5220 5222 5226 5228 5230 5234 5238 5242 5243 5248 5250 5258 5260 5261 5262 5263 5440 5330 5335 5340 5345 5350 ACCOUNT DESCR IPTIONIJUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TELEPHONE SERVICE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING DUES MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING RENT-FACILITY RENT EQUIPMENT SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT UNIFORMS CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERIVICES CONFERENCES PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE FUEL EXPENSE-CITY VEHICLES WEED ABATEMENT INSURANCE VEHICLES INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5601 OFFICE FURNISHINGS TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY FY 95-96 ACTUALS 507 3,292 2,509 1,641 675 279 2,498 1,020 358 1,248 1,322 137.348 28.500 2,688 799 3,493 91 5,638 930 26.128 2,620 43.172 13,500 34.036 314,292 820,038 FY 96-97 AT 12/31196 215 3.427 1,319 3,692 470 1,662 9O6 616 1,073 1,336 1,275 96,974 8,888 43 94 1,676 1,128 3,502 23,406 18,874 1.543 21,425 5,989 19,565 219,098 504,886 18 FY96-97 CURRENT BDGT 400 5,642 2,600 6,178 845 1,964 3.800 1.040 2,199 2,180 1.500 137,620 11,114 1.100 600 3,500 2,200 6,000 23,500 37.581 3.425 47.457 10.659 38,493 351,597 954.743 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 400 5,642 2,600 6,178 845 1,964 3,800 1,040 2,199 2,180 1,500 183,620 11,114 1,100 6OO 3,500 2,200 6.000 23,500 37.581 3.206 47.457 15.084 38,493 401,803 1,015,545 PAGE2 INCR~ (DECREASE) 46,000 (219) 4,425 50,206 60.bu2- R :~ICDE RMT~11DYEAR~97MY-162.WB2 03128 19:17 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING-DEPARTMENT 163 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 309,038 185,730 493,158 445,117 (48,041) 43,580 26,279 75,228 67,017 4,502 3,062 7,332 6,635 720 360 720 720 705 411 2,467 294 3,116 3,683 2,737 1,704 10,294 5,822 12.753 11,882 17,805 10,909 61,181 54,334 2,587 1,728 25 50 771 527 1,972 4,088 2,601 4,386 4,386 10,240 6,500 6,500 384 244 3.509 4,777 6,000 6,000 443 170 403,271 257,020 670,374 606,518 (8,211) (697) 567 (871) (6,847) 244 (63,856[ 19 R:U~IC DE RMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-163.WB2 03/28 19:26 ENGINEERING-DEPARTMENT 163 PAGE 2 ACCT ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5208 TELEPHONE SERVICE 5214 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES 5218 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5222 PRINTING 5224 LEGAL DOCUMENTS/MAPS 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5228 PUBLICATIONS 5230 POSTAGE & PACKAGING 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5243 UNIFORMS & SPECIAL CLOTHING 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5249 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5258 CONFERENCES 5260 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS 5261 STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION 5262 MILEAGE 5263 FUEL EXPENSE-CITY VEHICLES 5268 BLUEPRINTS 5330 INSURANCE 5340 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5345 SUPPORT SERVICES 5350 FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5601 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 5610 EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL ENGINEERING FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE. CURRENTBDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) (4) 1,003 2,000 2,000 1,403 948 3.000 3,000 1,181 710 1,300 1,300 2,023 1,481 3,700 3,700 132 1,000 1,000 125 35 850 850 44 102 450 450 11 250 250 1.127 1,100 1,100 374 400 400 400 1,350 9,000 9,000 22,962 11,700 20,000 20,000 1,918 1,018 4.750 4,750 788 30 1,000 1,000 210 75 400 400 1,042 670 1,500 1,500 446 26 800 800 3,129 1,865 3,500 3,500 360 22 500 500 20,324 20,007 39,836 39,836 33,580 12,025 26,652 26,652 10,500 6,127 12,889 15,328 26,472 20,372 38,030 38,030 128,015 80,098 172,907 175,346 2.439 2,439 531,286 337,118 843,281 781,864 (61,417) R:~MCDE RMT~11DYEAR ~97MY-163.WB2 20 o3/2a 19:26 ACCT ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 5118 TEMPORARY HELP TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5208 TELEPHONE SERVICE 5214 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-VEHICLE 5215 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT 5218 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5234 RENT 5238 RENT EQUIPMENT 5240 UTILITIES 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT UNIFORMS/BOOTS 5244 SIGNS 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5258 CONFERENCES 5260 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS 5261 STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION 5263 FUEL EXPENSE-CITY VEHICLES 5268 BLUEPRINTS 5401 DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 5402 ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 5403 FLOOD CONTROL 5410 STRIPING/STENCILING 5430 HAZ-MAT DISPOSAL AND STORAGE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CITY OF TEMECULA PUBUC WORKS MAINTENANCE-DEPARTMENT 164-601 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 F'Y 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96.97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT 19,567 19,567 2,564 1,201 2,500 2,500 6,836 4,317 8,000 8,000 1,211 444 1,500 1,500 36,187 23.800 52,000 52,000 5,100 2.640 5.280 5,280 2,232 2,838 10,000 10,000 1,565 939 1.450 1,450 3,141 2,409 2,500 2,500 2.960 1.269 5,460 5,460 27.845 12.045 29,000 29,000 2.500 2,500 5,785 969 5,570 5,570 120 1,000 1,000 10.213 5,613 11,400 11,400 71,204 46.241 125,000 125,000 491,654 471,050 733,131 733,131 9.000 9,900- 9,900 79,323 56,354 125,788 125,788 1,733 600 7,000 7,000 750,442 642,305 1.140,309 1,140.309 INCREASE (DECREASE) 21 R:'~MCDERMTWIIDYEAR~97MY601 .WB2 03/28 19:30 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE-DEPARTMENT 164-601 PAGE 2 ACCT NO. 5601 5610 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE FURNISHINGS EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE FY 95-96 ACTUALS 70,382 70,382 840,391 FY 96-97 AT 12f31/96 13,922 13,922 656,227 FY 9697 CURRENT BDGT 18,521 18,521 1,1 56,830 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 18,521 18,521 1.158,830 INCREA. (DECREASe) 22 R:~VlCDERM'I'~IDYEAR~97MY601 .WB2 03D~ 1 _e..,~3 ACCT NO. 5215 5218 5222 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PRINTING 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5228 PUBLICATIONS 5238 RENT EQUIPMENT 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5244 SIGNS 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5254 ADVERTISING 5256 PUBLIC NOTICES CONFERENCES 526O 5261 5262 54O5 54O6 5410 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STRIPING/STENCILING TOTAL OPERATINGEXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5601 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 5610 EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL PUBLICWORKS TRAFFIC CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC-DEPARTMENT 164-602 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT 299 1,072 151 377 2,971 8,000 463 360 30 18 178 87,892 8,899 2,437 86 3O 358 40,000 19 33,930 4,704 4,599 375 150,000 9,000 23582 113,147 113~147 27,248 27,248 258,723 25O 5O0 1,500 155 160 1,000 80O 1,753 40,000 450 500 500 5O0 150 375 3OO 150,000 9,000 23,582 231,475 27,248 27,248 258,723 INCREASE (DECREASE) 23 mcd ermt~,nidyea r~my961642.wql 28-Mar-97 ACCT NO. 5100 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 i5112 5113 5114 5115 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 5116 VISIONINSURANCE 5118 TEMPORARY HELP 5119 PART-TIME (Project) 5120 PART-TIME RETIREMENT 5121 OVERTIME WAGES 5190 LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES CITY OF TEMECULA PUBUC WORKS (OLD TOWN MAINTENANCE)-DEPARTMENT 164-603 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT 11 123 123 32 357 357 756 8,500 8,500 28 319 319 870 9,604 9,604 INCREASE (DECREASE) 24 R :~vtCDE R MT~MIDYEAR~97MYSO3.WB2 03~28 19:36 PUBLIC WORKS-DEPARTMENT 164-603 PAGE 2 ~' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5218 MAINTENANCE SUPPMES 5240 UTILITIES 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5415 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5610 EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS - OLD TOWN MAINT. FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 9~97 AT 12/31/96 87O FY96-97 CURRENTBDGT 5,000 7,000 5O0 19,500 FY 96-97 INCREASE PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 5,000 7,000 5O0 19,500 25 R:~ICDERMT~MIDYF. AR~97MY603.WB2 03/28 19:36 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5118 I 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES GENERAL FUND PUBLIC WORKS (ADMIN)-DEPARTMENT 164-604 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ~ FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 438,370 139,655 302,300 296,796 (5,504) 62,357 18,847 45,514 44,686 6,822 2,550 5,297 5,217 960 480 960 960 1,131 397 4,378 380 4,681 4,681 3,911 1,188 18,105 6,533 12,794 12,808 35,839 13,330 48,196 48,096 5,495 2,418 30 978 290 6,087 2,601 20,000 20,000 26,813 24,194 53,000 53,000 973 996 1,988 1,988 3,438 2,232 10, 000 10,000 727 581 616,414 216,672 504,730 498,232 (828) (80) 14 (100) (6,498) 26 R :~ICDE RMT~MI DYEAR~97MY604.WB2 03/28 19:39 PUBLIC WORKS 164-604 PAGE 2 . ~CT NO. 5208 5214 5220 5222 5224 5226 5228 5230 5242 5243 .5248 5250 5256 5258 15260 5261 5262 i5263 5268 5330 5335 5340 5345 15350 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTiON/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TELEPHONE SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT-VEHICLES OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING LEGAL DOCUMENT/MAPS DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT UNIFORMS CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES ADVERTISING PUBLIC NOTICE CONFERENCES PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE FUEL EXPENSE-CITY VEHICLES BLUEPRINTS INSURANCE VEHICLES INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN FY 95-96 ACTUALS 1,946 902 3,905 666 6 35 189 2,925 26 14,338 764 362 1,352 141 237 31,936 12,176 33,580 10,500 26,472 142,458' 758,872 FY 96-97 AT 12J31/96 1,351 1,490 377 78 355 1,660 3O5 8,290 1,107 176 174 144 76 13 32 15,760 7,780 11,117 4,953 16,500 71,738 288,410 FY96-97 CURRENT BDGT 3,450 1,500 4,100 2,5OO 1,500 615 5OO 4,000 2,302 26,908 2,500 99 99 2,000 400 2,000 250 2,850 250 31,380 17,811 24,612 10,676 32,304 174,606 679,336 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 3,450 1,500 4,100 2,500 1,500 615 500 4,000 2,302 26,908 2,500 99 99 2,000 400 2,000 250 2,850 250 31,380 15,045 24,612 12,390 32,304 73,554 671,786 INCREASE (DECREASE) (2,766) 1,714 (1,052) (7,550) R:~tCDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY604.WB2 27 0~28 19:39 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 ;5421 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES CITY OF TEMECULA CIP ADMIN-DEPARTMENT 165 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT 267,981 149,659 304,394 38,497 21,450 45,830 5,216 3,267 6,734 720 360 720 515 3OO 2,773 319 2,440 2,414 1,342 11,223 5,253 8,765 11,927 8,395 33,478 1,394 1,146 662 382 8,553 13,985 15,021 15,021 89,391 68,359 139,000 140,000 3,311 2,499 5,625 5,250 4,187 1,731 10,000 10,000 45 60 448,809 278,507 572,0O7 FY 96-97 INCREASE PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 287,589 (16,805) 43,299 (2,531) 6,345 (389) 720 2,514 74 8,285 (480) 31,968 (1,510) 1,000 (375) 550,991 (21,016) 28 R :~CDE R MT~MIDYEAR~97MY-165.WB2 03128 19:46 CIP ADMIN-DEPARTMENT 165 PAGE 2 ;T ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5214 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES 5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5222 PRINTING 5224 LEGAL DOCUMENTS/MAPS 5226 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 5230 POSTAGE & PACKAGING 5238 RENT EQUIPMENT 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5243 UNIFORMS & SPECIAL CLOTHING t 5248 CONSULTING SERVICES 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5254 ADVERTISING PUBLIC NOTICES 5258 CONFERENCES 5260 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS 5261 STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION 5262 MILEAGE 5263 FUEL EXPENSE-CITY VEHICLES 5330 INSURANCE 5335 VEHICLES 5340 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5345 SUPPORT SERVICES 5350 FACILITIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY 5610 EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL ClP ADMIN FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 F-Y 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT {DECREASE) 2,276 520 3,500 3,500 468 322 1,000 1,000 102 329 1,479 1,479 71 700 700 165 385 900 900 34 93 500 5O0 90 60 125 125 158 109 250 250 196 200 200 200 408 · 2,377 99 67O 597 1,144 14,516 2,392 23,984 7,500 18,908 76,155 912, 912 525,876 597 2,300 2,300 1,000 1,000 1,757 4,000 4,000 30 900 900 66 400 4O0 439 1,000 1,000 540 2,500 2,500 766 1,750 1,750 11,420 22,737 22,737 8,590 19,037 19,037 4,942 12,513 12,365 (148) 11,962 23,335 23,335 43,127 100,126 99,978 (148) 321,634 672,133 650,969 29 (21,164) R:~ICDE R MT~MIDYEAR~97MY- 165.WB2 03/28 19:4~ ACCT ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES 5208 TELEPHONE SERVICES 5214 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES 5215 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT 5219 TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENTS 5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5221 COMPUTER SOFTWARE-SUPPLIES 5222 PRINTING 5226 DUES & MEMBERSHIPS 5228 PUBLICATIONS 5230 POSTAGE & PACKAGING 5234 FACILITY CHARGE 5235 EXPLORER POST PROGRAM 5242 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 5243 UNIFORMS 5244 SIGNS 5250 OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES 5254 ADVERTISING 5261 STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION 5262 MILEAGE 5273 BOOKING FEES 5281 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS 5282 OFFICE ASSISTANT III 5284 CAL ID 5285 COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY 5288 SWORN STAFF 5289 COPS FAST 5290 CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER i5291 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER CITY OF TEMECULA POLICE-DEPARTMENT 170 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 3,206 581 13,298 5,372 2,021 1,597 662 510 1,039 3,714 1,591 75 114 90 55 17 69,233 78 4,200 1,734 1,197 587 910 1,397 14 8,158 1.331 172,392 87,383 135,902 71,098 239,681 139.670 35.740 16,804 27,702 30,704 2,428.123 1,213,050 32,122 70,387 56,312 28,682 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 1,000 1,000 20.000 20.000 5,000 5,0(X) 200 200 1.000 1,000 2,000 2.0(X) 2,400 2,400 50 50 150 150 100 100 112,500 112,500 1,000 1,000 4.OO0 4,00O 3,000 3.000 1.0O0 1.000 2,600 2,600 6,000 6.000 121,400 156,400 37.000 37,000 11,000 11,000 2,898,600 2,808,600 (35,0oo) 61.400 61,400 30 R:~MC DERMTWtlDYEAR~q7MY-170.WB2 03/28 19:5! POUCE-DEPARTMENT 170 PAGE 2 5~2 5294 5298 5299 5325 5326 5327 5345 5604 5610 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIONIJUSTIFICATION CRIME PREVENTION SUPPLIES Ko9 OFFICER-DOG OFFICER SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM MOTORCYCLE OFFICERS CRIMINAL INFO. SYSTEM BICYCLE PATROL K-9 FOOD AND SUPPLIES SUPPORT SERVICES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY COMPUTER HARDWARE EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL POLICE FY 95-96 ACTUALS 1.962 121,442 255,710 362,329 36,153 15,564 4,064 4.103,559 21,017 9,963 30,980 4,1341539 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 1,006 57.378 120.642 219,368 5,536 436 1,180 2,007,744 1.922 1,922 2,009,666 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 3,585 123,700 247.40O 494.800 38,100 35,000 9,500 3.000 4,954,985 13.280 99.315 112,595 5,067,580 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 3,585 123,700 247,400 494,8OO 38,100 35,000 9,500 3,000 4,954,985 19,280 99,315 118,595 5,073.580 INCREASE (DECREASE) 31 R :WIC DERM"F~IIDYEAR~97MY- 170.WB2 03~28 19:59 ACCT NO. 5104 5109 5112 5119 5120 5121 5201 5214 5215 5217 5220 5221 5222 5226 5228 5230 5239 5240 5242 5244 5250 5251 5261 5267 5274 5296 5345 5470 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES MEDICARE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX WORKERS' COMP PROJECT SALARIES PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE~VEHICLES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-OFF.EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES COMPUTER SOFTWARE-SUPPLIES PRINTING DUES & MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING EQUIPMENT LEASE UTILITIES SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT SIGNS OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES FIRE SERVICES STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION SOCIAL SERVICES T.IP. FUNDING FIRE PREVENTION EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES INTERIM FIRE STATION TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE-DEPARTMENT 171 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 4,629 750 504 173 414 462 1,078 2,659 1,275 160 1,302,625 1,616 5,250 6,93f 28,012 1,356,538 40 117 157 2,772 104 11 846 82 635 23 1,053 82 117 184 597,618 310 130 1,313 112 100 13,279 619,085 10,000 5,330 3,783 1,000 5OO 700 500 250 1,000 250 2,500 8,500 2,500 300 35,899 1,310,800 2,000 5,600 3,500 23,250 1,418,162 10,000 5,330 3,783 1,000 500 7OO 5OO 25O 1,000 250 2,500 8,500 2,500 3O0 5,899 1,438,932 2,000 5,600 3,500 254 23,250 1,516,548 (30,000) 128,132 98,386 R:~MCDERMT~MIDYEAR~97MY.171 .WB2 32 03128 20:11 " -' - DEPARTMENT 171 I ACCT NO. 5602 .5604 5606 5608 5610 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT COMPUTER HARDWARE COMPUTER SOFTWARE VEHICLES EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL FIRE FY 95-96 ACTUALS 2,819 576 31,755 35,150 1,391,688 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 18,751 25,351 44,102 663,187 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 21,518 27,288 48,806 1,466,968 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 21,518 27,288 48,806 1=565,354 INCREASE (DECREASE) 98.386 33 R:~tCDERM'I"~IIDYEAR~97MY-171 .WB2 03/28 20:'11 CITY OF TEMECULA ANIMAL CONTROL-DEPARTMENT 172 FY 1996--97 MIDYEAR BUDGET ACCT NO. 5255 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES ANIMALCONTROL FY 95.96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31196 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 58,066 19,654 60,000 55,000 (5,000) TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL 58,066 19,654 60,000 55,000 (5,000) 34 97MY~172.WB2 03r28 CITY OF TEMECULA NON-DEPARTMENTAL-DEPARTMENT 199 FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET ACCT NO. 5231 5250 5276 5365 5375 15382 5901 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES PROPERTY TAX ADMIN FEES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES SALES TAX REIMBURSEMENTS BOYS & GIRLS CLUB LOAN REFUND OF PRIOR YEAR REV TCSD ADMIN FEE CREDIT TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES OPERATINGTRANSFERS OUT TOTALNON-DEPARTMENTAL FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 18,954 5,050 528,236 8,114 100,000 162,000 822,354 22,000 600,000 23,000 610,000 195,334 316,834 316,834 195,334 938,834 949,834 1,000 10,000 11,000 2,709,676 451,316 3,488,887 3,503,470 14,583 3,532,030 646,650 4,427,721 &453,304 25,583 35/Final mcdermt ~nidyear~97my- 199 .wb2 29-Mar-9~ 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET GAS TAX FUND C~TY OF TEMECULA 'MARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE ., TAX FUND 1996-97 (MID-YEAR) 96-97 95-96 YTD Actual (~. 12/31196 96-97 Cuffent Budget 754,211 754,211 Total Revenues 778,500 403,581 Total Expenditures 778,500 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 403,581 96-97 Proposed Budget 754,211 754,211 Proposed Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance, Beg. of Year Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance, End of Year 778,500 (778,500) 754,211 (754,211) mcdermt~midyear~deptsum.wb2 1 31-Mar-97 ACCT NO 100 GAS TAX FUND GAS TAX FUND REVENUE DETAIL FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 96-97 YTD ~12/31196 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT YTD % OF BDGT FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT CHANGE IN BDGT 4025 -Grants 4062 -Recovery of Prior Year Ext. 4065 -Investment Interest 4076 -Reimbursements 4090 -OperaSrig Transfers In 4700 -Gas Tax 2106 4701 -Gas Tax 2105 4702 -Gas Tax 2107 4704 -Gas Tax 2107.5 TOTAL GAS TAX FUND 10,582 3,562 14,354 341 164,002 244,463 335,197 6,000 778,501 3,582 86,400 128,926 178,673 6,000 403,581 15,000 161,114 238,257 333,840 6,0O0 754,211 23.88% 53.63% 54.11% 53.52% 100.00% 53.51% 15,000 161,114 238,257 333,840 6,000 754,211 mcdermtYnidyear~97rev.wq I 2/Final 31-Mar-97 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS C~'rv OF TEMECULA ,~RY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND EQUITY h. ._RNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1996-97 (MID-YEAR) 96-97 96-97 96-97 Proposed 95-96 YTD Current Proposed Increase Actual (a:}. 12/31/96 Budget Budget (Decrease) Total Revenues 1,756,394 854,278 1,545,349 1,611,975 66,626 Total Expenditures by Fund: Insurance Vehicles Information Systems Support Services Facilities 382,578 164,489 400,790 417,361 16,571 53,136 22,174 52,200 52,200 402,827 280,518 611,736 646,343 34,607 154,578 97,437 230,604 239,194 8,590 310,359 177,729 359,548 363,329 3,781 Total Expenditures 1,303,478 742,347 1,654,878 1,718,427 63,549 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 452,916 111,931 (109,529) (106,452) 3,077 Ft,nd Equity, Beg. of Year t .hues Expenditures Fund Equity, End of Year 1,464,358 1,756,394 (1,303,478) 1,917,274 1,917,274 1,611,975 (1,718,427) 1,810,822 mcdermt~midye ar~de~)tsum.wb2 31 -Mar-97 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL FY 1996-97 MIDYEAR BUDGET FUND 4062 4065 4076 4090 4095 3OO INSURANCE -Recovery of Prior Year Expense -Investment Interest -Charges for Services -Operating Transfers In -Claims Recovery TOTAL INSURANCE FUND FY 95-96 ACTUALS 50,329 259,836 400,000 710,165 FY 96-97 YTD ~. 12/31/96 32,145 168,643 200,000 400,788 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT 50,000 335,790 2O0,OOO 585,790 YTD % Of BDGT 64.29% 50.22% 100.00% 68.42% FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT 50,000 335,790 200,000 585,790 CHANGE IN BDGT FUND 310 VEHICLES 4065 -Investment Interest 4076 -Charges for Services TOTAL VEHICLES FUND FY 95-96 ACTUALS 9,159 30,932 40,091 FY 96-97 YTD~12/31/96 4,670 17,453 22,123 FY96-97 ORIG BDGT 7,500 44,700 52,200 YTD % OF BDGT 62.27% 39.04% 42.38% FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT 7,500 44,700 52,200 CHANGE IN BDGT FUND 4050 4062 4065 4076 4090 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS -Pay Telephone Revenue -Recovery of Prior Year Expense -Investment Interest -Charges for Services -Operating Transfers In TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEM FY 95-96 ACTUALS 797 52 5,962 376,568 200,000 583,379 FY 96-97 YTD ~.12/31/96 103 34O 165,237 165,680 FY 96-97 ORIg bDgT 4,500 375,297 379,797 Y'I'D % Of BDGT 7.56% 44.03% 43.62% FY96-97 REVISED BDGT 4,500 375,297 379,797 CHANGE IN BDGT 4062 4065 4076 FUND 330 SUPPORT SERVICES -Recovery of Prior Year Expense -Investment Interest -Charges for Services TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES F FY 95-96 ACTUALS 23 4,633 117,748 122,404 FY 96-97 YTD (~.12/31/96 2,350 90,551 92,901 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT 4,000 164,014 168,014 YTD % Of BDGT 58.75% 55.21% 55.29% FY96-97 REVISED BDGT 4,000 230,640 234,640 CHANGE IN BDGT 66,626 66,626 FUND 340 FACILITIES 4062 4065 4076 -Recovery of Prior Year Expense -Investment Interest -Charges for Services TOTAL FACILITIES FUND FY 95-96 ACTUALS 509 2,977 296,868 300,354 FY 96-97 YTD ~12J31/96 1,438 171,348 172,786 FY 96-97 ORIG BDGT 1,000 358,548 359,548 YTD % OF BDGT 143.80% 47.79% 48.06% FY 96-97 REVISED BDGT 1,000 358,548 359,548 CHANGE IN BDGT 2 mcdermt~midyear~97rev.wq 1 31 -Mar-97 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND INSURANCE-FUND 300 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 19,969 10,496 20,846 20,827 (19) 2,768 1,423 3,139 3,136 290 159 302 302 52 25 157 177 87 138 58 459 230 171 95 425 87 29 15 147 120 2,886 899 29 1,300 25,534 12.704 28,740 147 119 2,880 1,300 28,711 (3) (1) (6) (29) R:\MCDERM'l%MIDYEAR~97MY-300.WB2 03/29 11:57 INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND ACCT NO. 5200 5204 5205 52O7 5226 5228 5246 5250 5261 5262 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES LIABILITY INSURANCE PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIMS ADJUSTER CLAIMS DUES & MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS LEGAL OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICE STAFF TRAINING & EDUCATION MILEAGE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL INSURANCE FUND ISF FY 95-96 ACTUALS 101,613 45,799 18,315 58,256 50 463 132,498 15 35 357,044 382,578 FY 96-97 AT 12,,'31/96 21,607 38.674 12,965 13,724 50 125 64,575 65 151,785 164,489 FY96-97 CURRENTBDGT 103,400 7g,000 23,400 30,000 50 400 135,000 600 200 372,050 400,790 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 103,400 79,000 40,000 30,000 50 400 135,000 600 200 388,650 417,361 PAGE 2 INCRE~. (DECREASE) 16,600 16,600 4 R:V~'ICDE RM'r~VIIDYEAR',97MY-300.WB2 03f29 11:5/ INTERNAL SERVICE FUND VEHICLES-FUND 310 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET ACCT ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT (DECREASE) 5360 DEPRECIATION 53,136 22,174 52,200 52,200 TOTAL VEHICLES FUND 53,136 22,174 52,200 52,200 5 97MY-310.WB2 04,/04 13:52 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL iNSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS-FUND 320 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31196 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT 54,453 28,523 54,122 65,894 INCREASE (DECREASE) 11.772 7.367 3,903 8.149 9,921 1,772 948 825 1,655 1.346 (309) 294 1.655 933 6,720 104 51 588 463 229 435 311 1,548 5.772 1,361 (615) 948 19,000 22,665 3.665 12.033 24,293 31,000 25,435 (5,565) 427 1.002 1,875 953 (922) 430 1.390 1,500 1,500 539 3.000 5,500 2,500 77,787 60,527 126.415 142,522 16,107 R :\MCD E R M'IAMIDYEAR~97MY-320.WB2 03/29 12:1! INFORMATION SYSTEMS ISF PAGE 2 5208 5209 5211 5215 5220 5221 5226 5228 5230 .5238 5242 '5248 5258 5260 5261 5262 5360 5391 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES TELEPHONE SERVICE RADIO SYSTEM CHARGES SOFTVVARE MAINTENANCE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-EQUIP OFFICE SUPPLIES COMPUTER SOFTWARE SUPPLIES DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS PUBLICATIONS POSTAGE & PACKAGING RENT EQUIPMENT SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES CONFERENCES PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS STAFF TRAINING/EDUCATION MILEAGE DEPRECIATION INTEREST TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ISF FY 95-96 ACTUALS FY 9~97 AT 12/31/96 FY96-97 CURRENT BDGT FY 96-97 INCREASE PROPOSED BDGT '(DECREASE) 75,891 48,159 70,000 78,000 8,000 11,878 3,600 7,700 7.700 16,297 3,373 26.000 26,000 2.713 2,644 8,000 8,000 328 25 500 500 39,736 16,241 35,100 43.600 8.500 30 2OO 200 1,279 1,017 1,700 1,700 62 44 250 250 256 171 360 360 41 3,167 4,500 6,500 2,000 10,114 13,469 22,461 22,461 20,571 10,469 15,550 15,550 885 6,000 6,000 124 200 200 4,742 7,540 19,300 19,300 1,539 687 2.500 2,500 137,669 109,385 265,000 265,000 885 325.040 219,991 486,321 503,821 18,500 402.827 280.518 611.736 646.343 34.607 7 R :~VlC DERMT~11DYEAR~97MY-320.WB2 03/29 12:15 ACCT NO, 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND SUPPORT SERVICES-FUND 330 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 INCREASE ACTUALS AT 12/31196 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT ('DECREASE) 21,834 11,611 24,638 26,044 1,406 2,917 1,604 3,709 3,921 212 318 181 358 443 85 294 104 51 294 172 85 145 67 2,676 1,776 259 144 347 143 5,772 145 639 294 242 5,760 4,000 500 2,000 100 600 99 (12) 4,000 400 1,400 29,503 15,866 35,614 43,204 7,590 R :~IC DE RMT~IIDYEAR~97MY-330.WB2 03129 12:2 SUPPORT SERVICESISF PAGE2 ..~¢T NO. 5217 5220 5230 5239 5242 5243 5250 5262 5277 5360 5391 555O ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES REPAIR & MAINT.-OFFICE EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES POSTAGE & PACKAGING EQUIPMENT LEASE SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT UNIFORMS OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES MILEAGE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DEPRECIATION INTEREST LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF ASSETS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES ISF FY 95-96 ACTUALS 12,210 21,746 211 49,363 69 818 14,229 26,080 349 '125,075 154,578 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 22,807 10,372 15,605 745 260 422 26,204 5,156 81,571 97,437 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 64,744 26,500 600 18.000 1,300 300 1,000 700 59O 66,447 14,809 194,990 230,604 FY96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 64,744 26,500 6O0 18,000 1,300 30O 2,000 700 590 66,447 14,809 195,990 239,194 INCREASE (DECREASE) 1,000 1,000 8,590 9 R %MC DE RMT~MIDYEAR~97MY-330.WB2 03129 12:22 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CITY HALL FACILITIES-FUND 340-701 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31196 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT INCREASE (DECREASE) 65,943 33,663 65,552 66,102 550 9,178 4,653 9,870 9,952 82 958 544 1,094 1,101 7 1,042 3,902 12,987 233 115 662 74 569 282 4,OO8 1,970 4,982 2,474 856 474 1,155 2,798 200 100 688 313 9,050 339 8OO 5OO 92,230 1,767 66 619 105,136 1,042 3,933 12,960 9,050 339 800 6,000 111,279 47,114 31 (27) 5,500 6,143 10 R:~ICDERMT~!IDYEAR~97MY-701 .WB2 03129 12:31 CITY HALL FACILITIES ISF PAGE 2 .J.T NO. 5212 5214 5219 5226 5234 5240 5242 5243 5250 5263 5335 5415 ~lO ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION REPAIR & MAINTENANCE FACILITY REPAIR & MAINTENANCE VEHICLE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS DUES & MEMBERSHIPS RENT-FACILITY UTILITIES SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT UNIFORMS OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES FUEL EXPENSE - VEHICLES VEHICLES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPE REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL FACILITIES CITY HALL FY 95-96 ACTUALS 16,230 2,798 2,168 143,313 42,656 523 7,501 2.940 218,129 310,359 FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 10,697 3,179 1,445 71,533 21,865 1,284 295 9,901 2,979 4,434 2,459 130,071 177,185 FY 96-97 CURRENT BDGT 27,500 1,000 10,055 4,400 86,400 51,452 2,7OO 22,500 500 3,425 10,000 4,434 2.459 226,825 331,961 FY 96-97 PROPOSED BDGT 27,500 1,000 10,055 4,4O0 86,400 51,452 2,700 22,500 500 1,063 10,000 4,434 2.459 224,463 335,742 INCREASE (DECREASE) (2,362) (2,362) 3,781 11 R:IMCDE R MT~IIDYEAR',97MY-701.WB2 03~29 12:31 ACCT NO. 5100 5101 5102 5104 5106 5108 5109 5110 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5126 5190 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES , DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT MEDICARE AUTO ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT TRAINING TAX DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT VISION INSURANCE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT TEMPORARY HELP PART-TIME (Project) PART-TIME RETIREMENT OVERTIME WAGES COMPENSATED ABSENCES LIFE & ACCIDENT iNSURANCE TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND MAINTENANCE FACILITY-FUND 340-702 FY 1996-97 MID-YEAR BUDGET FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 ACTUALS AT 12/31/96 CURRENT BDGT PROPOSED BDGT 6 131 131 16 380 380 22 187 187 384 9,050 9,050 14 339 339 442 10,087 10,087 INCREASE {DECREASE) 12 R:~MC DE RMT~MI DYEAR~7MY-702.WB2 03~29 12:34 MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ISF PAGE 2 · NO. 5212 5219 524O 5242 5250 5415 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION REPAIR & MAINTENANCE FACILITY TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENTS UTILITIES SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES FY 94-95 ACTUALS FY 96-97 AT 12/31/96 102 FY 95-96 CURRENT BDGT 2,500 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 102 17,500 FY 95-96 PROPOSED BDGT 2,500 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 17,500 INCREASE (DECREASE) TOTAL FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 544 27,587 27,587 1 3/Final R :~MCDE R MT~MI DYEAR~97MY-702.WB2 03129 12:35 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF F'I~., CITY MANAGER t~j~,~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director ~ DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Community Development Department's Planning Division caseload and project activity for the month of March 1997: Caseload Activity: The Department received 29 applications for administrative cases and 4 applications for public hearing cases for the month of March. The following are the public hearing cases: * Parcel Map-Res no Waiver 1 · Development Plan Subject to CEQA 1 · Development Plan w/CEQA 2 Total 4 Ongoing Projects: · Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project: Webb and Associates have been selected to develop the construction drawings for the Old Town Streetscape Improvement Projects. A kick off meeting was held on April 1, 1997 with staff and the design team was introduced at the Mainstreets general meeting April 9, 1997. · Murdy Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: Applicant is reviewing staff's comments and is making changes to the screen check draft EIR and Specific Plan. Nothing has been resubmitted at this time. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: The applicant has informed staff that they have reduced the number of units and will re-submitt plans in upcoming months. Staff will be meeting with the applicant at the end of April to discuss additional project details. R:\MONTI41.Y.RP~1997~.FEB.W'PD 4114/F7 vgw I Temecula Shuttle: The City has delivered the building pad and the construction of the facility is pending. Sign Ordinance: The Planning Commission will be considering the revised Sign Ordinance on their April 21, 1997 meeting. New Projects Trend: New applications include a 220-unit apartment complex along Margarita Road, a Vera Cruz Fish Market and restaurant, an expansion to the Embassy Suites Hotel, and commercial parcel maps for the Regional Center and Campos Verdes area. Design Guidelines: The City Council has concluded their review of the Design Guidelines. Staff is overseeing preparation of the final documents. Southside Sl~ecific Plan: An interview panel has been formed to select the consultant who will prepare the specific plan. The panel will consist of staff members, one Planning Commissioner and a Councilmember. Interviews are scheduled for April 22, 1997. Forest City Development mall and Power Center: Staff received plans for pre-application review on March 20, 1997 and met with the applicant on April 2, 1997 to discuss the project. A Planning Commission workshop was held on April 7, 1997. A tentative Planning Commission date has been established for June 2, 1997. R:\MONTI-ILY.RPT~I997~FEB.WPD 4/14/9'7 v~w ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:\MONTHLY.RPT~Ig~I~_.B.WPD 411410'7 vgw ~ REVPRIN2 r 97 uU1 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4111 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4' 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 4146 07:09:45 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEOA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GEOLOGY CEOA GEOLOGY ORD. 547 APZ LAFCO PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER AMENDEO FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CONDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK COND. CERT. OF COMPL. PLN. CK. CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1997 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 702.00 3,348.00 6,750.00 9,396.00 6,590.00 7,173.00 2,300.00 470.00 1,000.00 .00 392.00 .00 1,483.00 10,984.00 15,108.00 5,735.00 8,256.00 19,075.00 .00 11,261.00 528.00 9,254.00 880.00 .00 2,640.00 2,952.00 .00 15,904.00 6,202.00 16,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 MARCH REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,087.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 9,817.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 740.00 15.00 .00 .00 18.00 2,393.25 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1996-97 REVENUE .00 344.30 .00 743.00 19,189.00 .00 16,058.20 3,220.00 459.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 15,795.00 .00 .00 74,163.85 295.00- .00 .00 .00 5,550.00 2,614.00 .00 .00 36.00 18,304.05 .00 4,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL .00 357.70 49.0 3,348.00 0.0 6,007.00 11.0 9,793.00- 204.2 6,590.00 0.0 8,885.20- 223.9 920.00- 140.0 11.00 97.7 1,000.00 0.0 .00 392.00 0.0 .00 1,483.00 0.0 10,984.00 0.0 687.00- 104.5 5,735.00 0.0 8,256.00 0.0 55,088.85- 388.8 295.00 11,261.00 0.0 528.00 0.0 9,254.00 0.0 4,670.00- 630.7 2,614.00' 2,640.00 0.0 2,952.00 0.0 36.00- 2,400.05- 115.1 6,202.00 0.0 12,000.00 25.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00- *** .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 REVPRIN2 04/03/97 001 161 ACCOLINT # 4147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4170 4175 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 4262 4369 4370 07:09:45 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTZON VACATIONS PLAN CK DOCUMENT PROCESSING CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS FEMA STUOY REVIEW LONA REVIEW ORAINAGE STUDY REVIEW IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE K-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORMA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HAZAROOUS WASTE FACILITY LAND DIV UNIT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1997 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,480.00 .00 .00 .00 710.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 374.00 15,296.00 MARCH REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,120.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 1996-97 REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 9,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00 35,216.00 PAGE 2 BALANCE % COL .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,480.00 0.0 .00 .00 9,000.00- ~** 710.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00 ~ 19,920.00- Z~u.2 PLANNING 182,243.00 17,690.25 206,084.40 23,841.40- 113.1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~OR~)-r---~ CITY MANAGER '~'~/L CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager '~/Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for March, 1997. r:~agd rpt~moactrpt/ajp CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report APRIl. 1997 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Don Spagnolo Date: April 22, 1997 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1.1-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modlfientionq: The contractor has placed concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, and a barrier rail along the south side of the bridge. The contractor will be conducting the following work during the last two weeks of April: Relocating the traffic signal located on the westside of the bridge, installing an irrigation system for the new landscaping, placing a concrete sidewalk on the easterly and westerly sides of the bridge, and placing concrete on the slope beneath the westerly bridge support. The completion date for the project is September 1997. ~.. Fire Station #84: The contractor is scheduled to complete the remaining minor items of work in the next two weeks. It was recently determined that the water main pressure in Pauba Road is not sufficient to serve the building fire and water systems. The design of a booster pump system is presently being expedited and the system should be installed soon. This system, once completed, will provide sufficient pressure for both the fire and domestic system. 3. Walcott Corridor: The contractor is currently fine grading the slope and parkways along with installing the remaining V-ditches. The contractor is scheduled to complete the signing and striping by the end of April. The entire project should be completed including hydro seeding of the slopes in May 1997. 4. Traffic Signal at Route 79S and Margarita RoadfRedhawk Parkway: The traffic signal has been installed and is currently operating on flashing red, since the existing striping does not align with the signal heads. The contractor for the assessment district's road work has scheduled the paving work to begin during the middle of April. This is anticipated to take approximately 2-1/2 weeks. Upon completion of this work and the re-striping of the intersection, the traffic signal will be put into full operation. 5. City-Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory: Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has accepted the project and final report. completed and the City will be reimbursed $40,000. This project has been 6. City Maintenance Facility: The project is substantially complete except for some minor items of work. The Maintenance Department is anticipating moving into the new facility before the grand opening ceremonies which is scheduled for mid-May. 7. Aconstic Panel.q at the CRC Co'm: Due to the delivery of the wall acoustical panels, the project has been split up into two phases. Phase I will include the installation of the ceiling acoustical panels and the wall pads. Phase II r:~nolctrll, t\cip\97 /l~r.mlr Monthly Activity Report April 22, 1997 Page 2 will be the remaining work which is the wall acoustical panels installation. The contractor started Phase I on March 31 and will complete this phase by April 11. Phase H is scheduled to start on May 12 and end by May 16. All scheduling has been coordinated with the Community Service Department. This project includes installation of acoustical panels on the walls and on the ceiling in the basketball gym at the Community Recreation Center. Also, additional protection pads will be placed at both ends of the basketball court to provide a cushion for the ball players. 8. FY95-96 Pavement Management S. ystem: A preconstmction meeting is scheduled for April 23. Construction is anticipates to start in May. This project includes pavement reconstruction and overlays on Rancho Vista Road, Solana Way, and La Serena Way. 9. 6th Street: Construction of the boardwalk will be completed within the next two weeks as well as the restroom building roof and siding. Also, the on-site planter boxes and curbs will be placed and the driveway approach along Mercedes Street will be poured and the site will be cut to grade for paving. Project completion is anticipated in May. II. BID 1. Traffic Signal at SR-79S and Bedford C.o.rt: The City Council has approved solicitation of bids for construction of this project. This project will be out to bid during the week of April 14. This project includes construction of a interim 3- way traffic signal with a construction time of 90 days. 2. City Wide Intellitent Traffic Management System IITM~: Plans and specifications for Phase II of this project have been completed and this project is scheduled for April 22, 1997 City Council meeting to request approval for solicitation of construction bids. This is a federally funded project which is being administered by Caltrans. Caltrans issued the necessary permits for work within their right-of-way. HI. WORK IN DESIGN: 1.1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modificationn: Roadway plans were resubmitted to Caltrans (District 8) during the week of April 1, for final approval. Relocation of GTE facilities is required and an agreement between the City and GTE~ will be considered by the City Council for the relocation. The project will be bid as soon as Caltrans approves and signs the plans. This project includes widening the Rancho California Bridge and providing a northbound loop on-ramp. Monthly Activity Report April 22, 1997 Page 3 ~. I-IS/Overland Drive Overcrossing Inll)rovement~: Caltrans (District 8) returned plan check comments to the consultant during the first week of March and the consultant will resubmit roadway plans during the month of April. The structural plans were approved and signed by Caltrans Division of Structures. SCE will relocate the existing 115, 33, & 12 KVA overhead power lines prior to the construction of the proposed Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements. 3. Mt~rgarita Comm-nity Park: Several components of the project are still under design including the roller hockey rink. Specific design elements of the rink are still being developed. Once these are completed the project will be put out for public bid. The project includes picnic areas, a tot play area, restroom facilities, and open turf areas. The development of the two ball fields on the school district property will include two lighted tennis courts, and one lighted hockey facility and will be an add-alternate bid item. 4. Traffic Signal at Margarita Road & Solana Way: The design has been completed for the existing intersection improvements, which will utilize existing equipment that is stored in the city yard. However, this signal is also part of improvements that are required by both the proposed development of the northeast comer and the mall project. Construction will depend on the timing of these projects. 5. FY96-97 Pavement Management ,~ystem: The consultant has begun the preparation of the plans by assembling the preliminary data on sheets for the street design for this project. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Rancho California Road. 6. Pavement Management S. ystem Up-Date: The consultant has begun compiling the existing data for this project. This project will review and update the existing Pavement Management System which will include new streets which were added to the City's maintained system, preparing a new 5-year street maintenance program, and updating the computer generated City map. 7. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening: This project is Project I of the City's portion of the development agreement by and between the City and Forest City Development California, Inc. The City is currently developing a Request for Proposal for the design of the street widening improvements on the south side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and for the improvements on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive. 8. Overland Drive Street lnlprovements & Margarita Road Street Widenirlg: This project is Project II of the City's portion of the development agreement by and between the City and Forest City Development California, Inc. The City is currently developing a Request for Proposal for the design of the street widening improvements on both sides of Margarita Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive and new improvements on Overland Drive between Ynez Road and Margarita Road. r :~rn oact r p~\cip\g7 lipr .rnlr Monthly Activity Report April 22, 1997 Page 4 9. gtorm Brain Improvements on the so, th side of Winchester Rd. btwn. Ynez Rd. & Mnrrarit~ Rd.: This project is Project llI of the City's portion of the development agreement by and between the City and Forest City Development California, Inc. The City is currenfiy developing a Request for Proposal for the design of storm drain improvements south of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road. r:~mo~ctr;=t~cip~g7/~or.mer LAND DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT SPECIAL PROJECTS MARCH 1996 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak~ Prepared by: Ronald J. Parks Date: April 10, 1997. 1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor: The design criteria that accompanied the response that was received from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) is being analyzed by the design engineer for compliance. The revision to the storm drain plans will resume once an agreement has been reached with RCFC&WCD regarding the issues. Design of Eastern Municipal Water District's pump station relocation has been completed. 2. PW95-08 - First Street Fxtension: The design of this project is in a similar stage as the Western Bypass Corridor: resolving the issues with RCFC&WCD. Right-of-way acquisition negotiations are ongoing. 3. PW95-P6 - 6th Street Parking Project: The onsite parking improvements as well as the perimeter improvements are ongoing. The public restroom building metal roof and wood siding are scheduled for installation. Project completion is anticipated in May. PW96-05 - Project Study Report (PSR) And Project Report (PR) For Ultimate Interchange Improvements -t Interstate 15/State Ro-te 79 So-th (I-15/SR79SI: Caltrans comments on review of the PSR have been received. They raised certain concerns regarding the alternatives that we had presented in the PSR. Specifically, the viability of the preferred alternative, and its ability to provide acceptable level of service in the year 2020, suggested looking at other alternatives. We are addressing the comments by providing additional data supporting the alternatives we had initially submitted. R:~,~O ACTRPT~DE'V~.~J~I ARCH.WI 0 .9.o 0 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent April 1, 1997 Monthly Activity Report - March, 1997 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of March, 1997: III. IV. VI. SIGNS A. B. C. TREES A. VII. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 412 New and repainted legends B. 200 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 95 41 25 43 173 11 61,277 17 3,488 i R:~ROADS~ACTRPT~97 ~IARCH.RPT ¢n MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- March, 1997 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 34 service order requests ranging from weed abateme~ tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 28 service order requests for the month of February, 1997. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 51 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. PESTMAST!=R S!=RVIC!=S has coml~leted the following: · 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $0.00 compared to $19,391.83 for February, 1997. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March, 1997 was $23,062.88 compared to $281,738.51 for the month of February, 1997. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $19,794.88 2,500.00 768.00 cc: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Ron Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development All Moghadam, Associate Engineer-Traffic/Capital Projects R:~ROADS~ACTRPT~9 7~VIARCH.RPT rh I,U LU 0~', on~ Z O0 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March, 1997 DATE STRF!=T/CHANN!=L/BRID¢,F DFSCRIPTION OF TOTAl COST ACCOUNT # WORK SIZE March, 1997 # 5402 ! . Wl! ! IAMS ! ANDSCAPE FY96-97 Right-of-way Tree Trimming Program Citywide Total R.O.W. Trees 273 TOTAL COST : · MAP!:ES & ASSOCIATFS: :? 03/12/97 La Paz Road @ Vallejo Avenue Shoulder Grading # 5402 $14,585.00 03/13/97 # 5402 03/17/97 #5402 La Paz Road @ Ynez Road Jedediah Smith Road between Ynez and Cabrillo Avenue TOTAL COST A.C. Repairs Total S.F. Total A.C. TOTAL COST A.C. Repairs Total $.F. Total A.C. TOTAL COST TOTAL S.F. TOTAL A.C. TOTAL AMOUNT ACCT #5402 $709.88 900 12 Tons $2,250.00 200 6 tons $2,250.00 1,100 S.F. 18 Tons $19,794.88 R:'~ROAD S~C TRPT~9 7 ~ ARC H .RPT th March, 1997 Contractors Report DATE STRF!=TICHANNr:LIBRIDGE DFSCRIPTION OF TOTAL COST ACCOUNT # WORK SIZE 5401 O3/1 O/97 Santiago Road Repair Desilting Ponds #5401 TOTAL COSTS TOTAL AMOUNT ACCT #5401 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 03/11/97 #999-5402 DATE STRFFT/CHANNELIBRIDGr: DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL ACCOUNT # COST 999-5402 SIZE Santiago Road Grade Dirt Roads John Warner Road Ormsby Road Paulita Road Lolita Road TOTAL COST $768.00 TOTAL AMOUNT ACCOUNT # 999-5402 $768.00 4 R:~RO AD S~AC TRPT~,9 7 ~VIAR C H .RPT rh DATE 03/03/97 03/04/97 03/06/97 03/O6/97 03/07/97 03/10/97 03/11/97 03/11/97 03/17/97 03/19/97 03/19/97 03/19/97 03/21/97 03/25/97 03/24/97 03/26/97 03/27/97 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF MARCH- 1997 I LOCATION I WORK COMPLETED Margarita ~ Southern Cross Road Removed 120 S.F. of Graffiti Jefferson ~ Empire Creek Removed 1470 S.F. of Graffiti Winchester Creek ~ Winchester Removed 60 S.F. of Graffiti Pala Road Park Removed 3 S.F. of Graffiti Solana Way a @ Via La Vida Removed 16 S.F. of Graffiti 26435 Endasure Removed 30 S.F. of Graffiti 29705 Solana Way Removed 500 S.F. of Graffiti 42101 Moraga Road Removed 120 S.F. of Graffiti Camino Del Este ~ Camino Corto Removed 5 S.F. of Graffiti La Serena Tract Removed 22 S.F. of Graffiti Milano ~ Villa Venecia Removed 10 S.F. of Graffiti Main Street Bridge Removed 9 S.F. of Graffiti La Serena Tract Removed 815 S.F. of Graffiti 27740 Jefferson Avenue Removed 300 S.F. of Graffiti Leena Way ~ Meadows Parkway Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti Santa Cecilia ~ Mira Loma Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti Del Rio ~ Jefferson Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 3,488 TOTAL LOCATIONS 17 i~OAD~W~C MPLTD~7~GR..M:FITr~M~CH. I~T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- UJ - 0 - ~ I I I - UJ t CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF MARCH, 1997 DATEi i ~ .~ ~... :> ~.~:: ii!LO:CA TION i:i :~ :"~:~"~ ~ :~:~ ~REQUEST~ ~ ~ DATE WORK RECEIVED :~ : :>: ~:" i <: ~.i~i < i~ ~ 'COMi~LETED 03/03/97 30368 Via Canada Erosion around head wall 03/03/97 03/03/97 28721 Front Street Tree trimming 03/03/97 03/04/97 Coronado ~ Ynez Street name sign down 03/04/97 03/04/97 Tierra Vista Lost Business folder 03/04/97 03/04/97 42141 Avenue Vista Ladera Potholes 03/04/97 03/05/97 Lower Highway 79(S) Water flowing 03/05/97 03/06/97 30552 Ridgeview Circle Broken glass 03/06/97 03/07/97 Via La Vida ~ Solana Way Graffiti 03/07/97 03/10/97 28753 Via Montezuma ROW weed spraying 03/10/97 03/10/97 Rancho California Rd ~ Asteroid Tree trimming 03/11/97 03/11/97 29922 Avenue Cima Del Sol Tree trimming 03/11/97 03/11/97 29772 Avenue Cima Del Sol Tree trimming 03/11/97 03/11/97 42101 Moraga Road Graffiti 03/11/97 03/12/97 Rancho California Road ~ Cosmic Dr Dip at intersection 03/12/97 03/13/97 Main Street Bridge Debris removal 03/13/97 03/17/97 Del Este ~ Camino Corte Graffiti 03/17/97 03/17/97 31168 Calle Aragon Tree roots 03/17/97 03/17/97 Margarita at Moraga Dead skunk 03/17/97 03/17/97 31578 Corte Salinas Tree trimming 03/17/97 03/17/97 29827 Via Puesta Del Sol Tree trimming 03/17/97 03/18/97 31782 Paseo De Las Olas Tree removal 03/18/97 03/19/97 29777 Via Puesta Del Sol Root prune 03/24/97 03/20/97 44675 Clover Landscape maintenance 03/21/97 03/20/97 31145 Via Norte Tree trimming 03/20/97 1 R~%P. OADSXW~CMPLTE~ E RV] C Eg~RC H .iL~T MARCH- 1997 03/21/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/25/97 03/26/97 03/26/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 Via Puerta ~ Camino Corte 29705 Solana Way 29830 Mira Loma Drive 44181 E. Vallejo Avenue 42690 Rio Nedo Way 27740 Jefferson 29489 Via Las Colinas 31241 Corte Alhambra Bogart Place 41830 6th Street REQUEST SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG ..... COM~I.ET Graffiti 03/21/97 Graffiti 03/24/97 Tree trimming 03/24/97 Debris Pick-up 03/24/97 Pothole in R O W 03/24/97 Graffiti 03/25/97 Natural drainage course concerns03/26/97 Tree concern 03/26/97 Repair of R-1 sign 03/31/97 Tree concerns 03/31/97 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 34 2 RAROADb~WKCMPLTDX97~E RVICE'OAARCH.RPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF MARCH, 1997 03/03/97 Cherry Avenue ~ Jefferson Replaced 1 W-17 Faded 03/03/97 Diaz Road ~ SKS Installed 8 C-7 03/04/97 Between Moraga & Margarita Replaced 6 R-26D Faded 03/05/97 Between Moraga & Margarita Replaced 4 R-26D Faded 03/05/97 Between Moraga & Margarita Replaced 1 R-2-40 Missing 03/05/97 Meadows parkway s/o Pauba Road Replaced 1 SR-4 Missing 03/07/97 Via Gilberto Replaced 1 W-31 Faded 03/07/97 Pala Road ~ Loma Linda Replaced 1 R-1 Graffiti 03/07/97 Clubhouse ~ Palermo Replaced 1 R-1 Faded 03/07/97 Masters ~ Clubhouse Replaced 2 R-1 Faded 03/07/97 Pala Road ~ Muftield Replaced 1 R-1 Faded 03/07/97 Solana ~ Via La Vida Replaced 1 R-1A Faded 03/10/97 Santiago ~ Front Street Replaced 1 R1-2 TC 03/10/97 Terra Vista ~ Calle Nacido Replaced 1 R-1 Missing 03/10/97 Pala Road ~ Clubhouse Replaced 1 R-1 Faded 03/10/97 Clubhouse ~ Bayhill Replaced 1 R-1 Faded 03/10/97 Bay Hill ~ Rainbow Canyon Road Replaced 1 R-1 Faded 03/11/97 Rainbow Canyon Road Replaced 1 R-48 Shot up 03/12/97 1st ~ Pujol Replaced 1 Type N Faded 03/12/97 Ridge Park ~ Rancho California Rd Replaced 1 W-17 Faded 03/12/97 Rancho Way ~ Diaz Replaced 1 R-1 Graffiti 03/12/97 Del Rio ~ Via Montezuma Replaced 2 Type N Faded 03/12/97 Las Haciendas ~ Del Rio Replaced 1 Type N Faded 03/12/97 Del Rio ~ Calle Cortez Replaced 1 Type N Faded 03/12/97 Jefferson ~ Winchester Replaced 1 W-41 Faded P~'~OAD ~WKC MP LTD'~TkS1GN S~dARC H.KPT MARCH, 1997 SIGNS REPLACED/INSTALLED 03/13/97 03/13/97 03/13/97 03/14/97 03/14/97 03/14/97 03/17/97 03/17/97 03 / 18/97 03/19/97 03 f 9/97 03/19/97 03/! 9/97 03/19/97 03/19/97 03/20/97 03/20/97 03/20/97 03/20/97 03/21/97 03/21/97 03/25/97 03/25/97 03/26/97 03/26/97 03/26/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 Rio Nedo Rio Nedo Avenida Alvarado End of Madison End of Madison- Rancho Way ~ Diaz Canyon Creek ~ Oak Cliff Canyon Creek ~ Oak Cliff Winchester ~ Jefferson Butterfield Stage ~ DePortola Butterfield Stage ~ DePortola La Primavera Villa Alturas Loma Portola Yukon Margarita ~ Yukon N. General Keamey ~ Sierra Madre N. General Keamey ~ Sierra Madre Yukon Enterprise Circle West Chemin Laurent ~ Corer Beaune Mira Loma Mira Loma Mira Loma Area #2 Area #2 Yukon Rancho California Rd w/b Moraga Replaced 1 W-31 Faded Replaced 5 Type N Faded Replaced 5 Type N Faded Replaced 1 W-31 Faded Replaced 1 Type N Faded Replaced 1 W- 17 Faded Replaced 1 W-31 Faded Replaced 1 Type N Faded Installed 2 Type K Installed 2 R7A Installed 3 Type K Installed 1 Type K Installed 4 Type K Installed 2 Type K Replaced 9 R-26D Faded Replaced 1 R-26D Faded Replaced 1 W-31 Faded Replaced 1 Type N Faded Replaced 4 R-26D Faded Installed 1 R-2 25 Installed 1 W-53 Installed 2 R-2 "30" Replaced 2 "C" signs Installed 1 W-63 Installed 3 R7 Installed 11 Type K Replaced 3 R-26D Replaced 8 R-26D Replaced 5 R-26D R:~ROAD S~WKC M PL"rD~ 7'~S IGN S~d~C H.RPT MARCH, 1997 SIGNS REPLACED/INSTALLED 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 Circle Beauregard ~ Chardonnay Hills Riesling (~ Rancho California Road Area #2 (see daily for locations) Area #2 (see daily for locations) Area #2 (see daily for locations) Margarita @ Rancho California Road n/b Margarita ~ De Portola Bogart @ Pauma Valley WORK COMPI.ETED: ~:!. i~: Replaced 1 R-1 Faded Replaced 1 R- 1 Faded Replaced 2 R- 1 Faded Replaced 1 W- 17 Faded Replaced 3 Type N Faded Replaced 1 W-41 Faded Replaced 1 R-81 TC Replaced 1 R- 1 Missing TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 95 41 25 ItgtOAD SSWKC M P LTDX0 7XS I GN SXMARC H. Rffi' DATE 03/03/97 03/04/97 03/06/97 03/07/97 03/07/97 03/10/97 03/11/97 03/12/97 03/13/97 03/21/97 03/25/97 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF MARCH, 1997 LOCATION ! Area # 1 Repainted Area # 1 Repainted Area #1 Repainted Area #1 Repainted Area #1 Repainted Area #2 Repainted Area #2 Repainted Area #2 Repainted Area #2 Repainted Area # 1 Repainted Mira Loma Installed WORK COMPLETED 55 legends 55 legends 36 legends 14 legends 200 L.F. 8" solid white 61 legends 66 legends 47 legends 55 legends 19 legends 4 legends TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS L.F. OR NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING 41~ 200 L.F. It ~.OAD ~C M P LTD~ 7~v]'ENC I LSg~RC H. ]G~[' CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF MARCH, 1997 03/06/97 03/10/97 03/11/97 03/24/97 03/24/97 Area #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS Area #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 30038 Pachanga Drive CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS Corer Beaune CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS Avenita De La Reina CLEANED & CHECKED 5 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 11 R:~.OAD ~WKC IdPL'rD~ 7~CATCHB ASkMARC H ,R.FF CITY OF TEMECUI~ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT OF WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF MARCH, 1997 03/07/97 Via Gilberto TRIMMED 2 03/10/97 45566 Matez TRIMMED 1 03/10/97 Pala Road ~ Clubhouse TRIMMED 1 03/11/97 Rainbow Canyon Road TRIMMED 1 03/12/97 28955 Pujol TRIMMED 1 03/13/97 Via Lobo Channel TRIMMED 4 03/17/97 Margarita north of Moraga TRIMMED 30 03/26/97 Sama Cecilia ~ Mira Loma TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 43 It g~.OAD ~WY,.C M PLTD~7~TP,,E E S~,,{ARC H.RFF r CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF MARCH, 1997 03/13/97 Ynez between Rancho Vista & Pauba Removed 1,045 SF 03/13/97 Via Lobo Channel Removed 1,000 $F 03/17/97 Margarita north of Moraga Removed 700 SF 03/20/97 Jefferson north of Winchester Removed 5,240 SF 03/24/97 Jefferson north oflLancho California Rd Removed 16,920 SF 03/24/97 Del Rio Road Removed 9,912 SF 03/26/97 Area # 1 Removed 18,460 SF 03/27/97 Jefferson north of Rancho California Road Removed 8,000 SF of ROW weeds of ROW weeds of ROW weeds of ROW weeds of ROW weeds of ROW weeds of ROW weeds of ROW weeds I TOTAL S.F. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEEDS ABATED 61,277 P..:'~OAD~¥KC M PL'I'Dk9 7~WEEDS'uMARCH.R.PT