Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
062299 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 22, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. !5:30 P.M. 'Sections: - Closed SesSik)'n 0f"'tht" City cbuncjl: conference with Ci~ A~orney and legal. counsel:.~p~f~t:~[d~:;Go~emment'.COde: Section 54956;8(b).and (c) with respect to ~o makers of potential'~liti~tion, With respect to these makers, the CiW reached where there is a significant on existing facts and circumstances and the C'iW";~i~i~ deci~,~:'~r~;~b:: injtiat'~.:; litigation, .' · '. ': ...::.:'::'. "' .'...:E: ':" ':"" At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Jordan Bellino Pastor George Simmons of House of Praise Councilman Lindemans Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Amateur Radio Week Proclamation Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 99-12 Resolution: No. 99-48 R:~Agenda\062299 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (1 O) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1999; 2.2 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1999. Resolution Approving List of Demands .RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R AAgenda\062299 2 A RESOLUTION OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 99- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLAIMS AND DEMANDS Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 4.2 Review the program being implemented by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA); Consider adopting the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOND INITIATIVE Amendment to Contract with David Turch and Associates RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve an amendment to the contract with David Turch and Associates which extends the contract period to June 30, 2000, for the annual contract amount of $28,000. City Council Chamber- Facility Use Policy RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Facility Use Policy for the use of the City Council Chambers. Resolution Adoptinn FY 1999/2000 Solid Waste Rates RECOMMENDATION: 7,1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 R:~Agenda\062299 3 8 Cable Television Franchise Transfer 9 10 11 12 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., TO CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, L.P. Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1999- 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc. to reassign the original agreement between the City of Temecula and Excel Landscape, Inc. to the Temecula Community Services District. Contract Extension for the Professional Services A.~reement to prepare the Southside Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 1 with RBF extending the performance period to June 30, 2000. Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Brid.qe Wideninn and Northbound Ramp Improvements - Project No. PW95-12 - Reduction in Retention withheld from Contractor RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve a reduction in the retention amount held from Riverside Construction Company from ten percent (10%) to five percent (5%) for the Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements - Project No. PW95-12. Parcel Map No. 28962 (located north of Santia.ao Road, south of Estero Road, and east of Ormsbv Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28962 in conformance with the approved Conditions of Approval. R:~,genda\062299 4 13 Tract MaD No. 23143-2 (located south of Pauba Road, east of Butterfield StaGe Road. and north of De Portola Road RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-2 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 13.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 13.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agraements. 14 Tract MaD No. 23143-3 (located south of Pauba Road. east of Butterfield StaGe Road. and north of De Podola Road RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-3 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 14.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 14.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agreements. 15 Tract MaD No. 23143-4 (located south of Pauba Road. east of Butterfield Stage Road. and north of De Portola Road RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-4 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 15.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 15.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agreements. 16 Summarily Vacate Portions of Public Streets in Parcel MaD No. 20278 (located at the northeast comer of Solana Way at Maraarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING PORTIONS OF SOLANA WAY AND MARGARITA ROAD IN PARCEL MAP NO. 20278 R:V~4}enda~:)6228e 5 17 All-Way Stop - Margarita Road at DePortola Road 18 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP INTERSECTION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND DEPORTOLA ROAD Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation - Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-29 RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Accept the project - Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho California Road & Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-29 - as complete; 18.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 18.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. 19 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-11 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX TO FINANCE THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITHIN THE TERRITORY ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~Agenda\062299 6 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING *************** **,,,,, **, ********, ****** *****, ** *************,,,, ******************~**,, a, .~,~]~,,.' ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~, *****e ' ~ . '. ' ' "~j. ~ ~'.... ;*.' .~ ;?~,,,~:~:~'~'F :* ~,,~ ?;*.. ~:".~' ,. "' Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01 Resolution: No. CSD 99-07 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1999. 2 Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1999-00 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc. to accept the reassignment of the original agreement between the City and Excel Landscape, Inc. to the Temecula Community Services District in the amount of $738,468 and an additional amount not to exceed $65,820 for sites to be brought on line during the term on the contract for Fiscal Year 1999-00; R:~,genda\062299 3 4 5 2.2 Extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years and allow for the addition of supplement landscape maintenance contract areas for the term of the agreement; 2.3 Approve contingency of 10% in the amount of $73,850 for extra work items. Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement Areas into Service Level C for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO-TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT NO. 28309 INTO SERVICE LEVEL C (RATE LEVEL 1) FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999- 2000 3.3 Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement documents. Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-2000 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Award a two-year (2) contract to Self's Janitorial Service to provide park and facility restroom maintenance services in the amount not to $41,400 to for Fiscal Year 1999-00. Ratification of Election Results- Tract No. 23143 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\062299 8 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 2, 1999, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 6 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D - RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 R:~Agenda~62299 9 DISTRICT BUSINESS 7 Temecula Valley Museum - Interior Exhibit Design RECOMMENDATION: 7, 1 Approve in its substantial form the interior exhibit design concepts for the Temecula Valley Museum, 8 Review and Approval of the FY 1999-2000 Annual Operatin.cl Budget RECOMMENDATION: 81 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, June 29, 1999, at 6:00 P.M., CIP Workshop, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:V~,genda\062299 10 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGEN,C,:Y.ME. ETIN,.G: ' ';. ""':'.'. ~.~ ~::,:::.~:,:' ......:'~'~:':!:.~!:"~"' ~':"' ",' ': Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01 Resolution: No. RDA 99-10 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1999. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Review and Approval of the FY 1999-2000 Temecula Redevelopment A~ency Annual Operating Budget RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RAAgenda\062299 11 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, June 29, 1999, at 6:00 P.M., CIP Workshop, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~genda\062299 12 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 20 Modification of the Parking Standards for part of the Old Town Specific Plan (Planning Application No. PA99-0160) RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0160) 21 An Umency Ordinance Amendin.q the California Fire Code RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment; 21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE R:~Agenda\062299 13 21.3 Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled: URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION 21.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION 22 An Ur.aency Ordinance Amendin.cl the Uniform Building Codes RECOMMENDATION; 22.1 Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment; 22.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODES, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE R:~,genda\062299 14 22.3 Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled: URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF 22.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE COUNCIL BUSINESS 23 Pro~osed Traffic Sianal at the intersection of Mamarita Road and Pio Pico Road RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Approve installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road. R:%Agenda%062299 15 24 Award ~f q,,onstruction Contract for Traffic Sianal Installation at the Intersections of Maroadta Road at Pio Pico Road - Proiect No. PVV98-12 - and Mamadta Road at Pauba Road - Proiect No. PVV98-13 RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Award a consffijction contract for the installation of traffic signals at the intersections of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No. PVV98-12 - and Margarita Road at Pmaba Road - Project No. PW98-13 - to DBX, Inc. of Ternecula, California, in the amount of $219,467.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 24.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $21,946.70, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 24.3 Accelerate appropriation of budgeted funds in F"Y 1999-2000 to FY 1998-1999 in the mount of $85,900.00 to construction Account No. 210-165-700-5804. 25 Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Adopt a resolution antitied: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 TO FINANCE RECREATIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS 26 Aooroval of Election Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999 R:%Agends1062299 16 26.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99... A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES 26.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE 27 Review and Adoption of the FY 1999-2000 Annual ODemtin.a Budget RECOMMENDATION: 27.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS R:%Agenda~062299 17 27.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF POSITIONS THE CITY OF AUTHORIZED 27.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 1999-00 28 Adoption of an Umencv Ordinance prohibiting the permitting. approval. development. and placement of additional Wireless Communications Facilities RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Adopt sn Urgency Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING, APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT, AND PLACEMENT OF ALL FORMS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, June 29, 1999, CIP Workshop, at 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California. R:V~gends~06229~) 18 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MAY 11, 1999 CLOSED SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. It was duly moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City and/or the Agency. The following cases will be discussed: City of Temecula vs. Pala Rainbow LLC. 2. Discussion of candidates for position of City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, and Ford. Absent: Councilmember: None. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Sandi Sharp, Ashley Musick, Melissa Cayalyab, and Jilljan Cook. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Stanley Lubeck of Church on the Rock. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Lindemans. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS First Annual Recycling Recognition Awards Pro.clram Introducing the First Annual Recycling Award Program, Mayor Ford advised that this program has successfully assisted the City in meeting its State requirements regarding the reduction of disposable materials deposited at the landfill, In light of this accomplishment, Mayor Ford announced that the City would like to recognize and reward the following households in their extreme recycling efforts: The Meyer Family The Oveson Family The Trebon Family R:\Minutes\051199 The Kicak Family The Pepe Family The Cook Family Mr. Ed Campos of CR&R commended the families on their recycling efforts and presented each with various rewards. Certificates of Achievement for Cub Scouts highest rank of Arrow of Light Commending the Arrow of Light recipients, Certificates of Achievement were presented to the following individuals: John Haynes Brian Jordan Noah Ng Thomas Polhill Michael Thomas Matthew Carreon Travis Blair Javier Medellin Jeremy Dempster Michael Tessen Daniel Tonkins Ryan Tynning Vance Woodward Proclamation for Fibromyal.qia Awareness Day Mayor Ford so proclaimed May 12, 1999, as Fibromyalgia Awareness Day and presented a proclamation to Ms. Sandy Waller who expressed appreciation to the City Council and further elaborated on this disease and its daily impacts on those who have it. Certificate of Appreciation to Guidant Corporation Thanking the Guidant Corporation for their cooperation with the construction of the Overland Overcrossing Project, a Certificate was presented and accepted by Ms. Susan Norton. Certificate of Appreciation to Southern California Edison Thanking Southern California Edison for their cooperation with the construction of the Overland Overcrossing Project, a Certificate was presented and accepted by Mr, Nick Savala and Mr. Bob Lopez. Special Achievement Award Mayor Ford presented the five-year pin to Mr. Charles Coe, Chairman of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. Ms. Amy Ellevold, Christian Youth Theatre, provided a short performance from Alison in Concert; thanked the City Council for its continued support; and invited the Council and the public to attend the upcoming event. R:\Minutes\051199 PUBLIC COMMENTS With regard to the General Plan as it relates of North General Kearney Road and Sanderling Way, Mr. Bob Lopshire, 40244 Atmore Court, encouraged the City to open North General Kearney Road and Sanderling Way Road in order to relieve traffic congestion. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Reiterating previously made comments, Councilman Comerchero confirmed that the City will be the recipient of a San Diego Padre Park project. B. Commenting on the simplicity with which Sister City Voorburg operates, Councilman Comerchero encouraged the City to consider such simplicity for specific operations such a transportation and shared his unforgettable experience while visiting Voorburg and extended appreciation to the host families. C. Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project be agendized and that the possibility of a reimbursement agreement be discussed with the landowners. D. Considering the impacts the ongoing infrastructure improvements are having on the City's overall traffic flow, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that no traffic flow modifications be made during peak hours. E. With regard to traffic congestion, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that staff address the left-turn signal at southbound Front Street onto Rancho California Road (traveling east). F. Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that those Commissioners designated to attend the City Council meeting be provided a copy of the Agenda packet. G. Commenting on the results of a joint San Diego Association of Governments in Southern California and Association of Governments meeting, Councilman Roberts advised that both entities will work together in an effort to discuss a regional transportation plan, airport system planning, and high-speed rail. H. Having received recent TCI pricing information, Councilman Roberts relayed his opposition to the increase in rates in light of the service provided and requested that staff consider the renegotiation of the contract. I. Echoing Councilman Comerchero's comments, Councilman Lindemans as well commented on the simplicity with which Sister City Voorburg addressed transportation issues. R:\Minutes\051199 3 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 23, 1999. 3 Resolution ADDroving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1999. 5 Award of Contract for two Compaq Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartrid.cle Tape Library Backup System RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award a contract for two Compaq Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartridge Tape Library Backup System to Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., Riverside, California, in the amount of $91,993.42; 5.2 Appropriate $91,994 in General Fund Reserves. Pulled and considered under separate discussion; see page 8. R:\Minutes\051199 6 Professional Services Plannin.Q Agreement - BidAmerica and City of Temecula - Archiving Planning Files to Computer Discs RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 6.2 Approve a Professional Services Agreement between BidAmerica and the City to provide Compact Discs (CDs) of the Planning Files and Maps by scanning the documents and creating a database table compatible with our 8ierra System to retrieve and reproduce these plans and documents through the City computer network and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; Approve an appropriation of $35,013.03 from the General Fund Reserves to the Planning Department Consulting Services Account Number 001-161-999-5248 for creating a database table, labeling, and scanning approximately 1,820 plans, 160,615 documents, and 1,456 multi-page project files. 7 Authorize Temporary Street Closure for Cowboy Poetry and Western Music Show Event at the Musicians Workshop in Old Town (Mercedes Street from Second Street to Third Street) RECOMMENDATION: 7,1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURE FOR COWBOY POETRY AND WESTERN MUSIC SHOW ON MAY 28, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT Considering the distance this property is from Mr. Stone's property, City Attorney Thorson confirmed that Mayor Pro Tem Stone may vote with regard to this Item. Release Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities for Sewer Improvements in Parcel Map No. 23426 (located at the easterly side of Ynez Road southerly of Solana Way) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities for sewer improvements in Parcel Map No. 23426. 8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and the surety. Accept Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 28697 (located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road - State Route 79 North - and Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the public street including median, sewer, and water improvements in Parcel Map No. 28697; R:~Minutes\051199 10 11 12 13 9.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, Water, and Sewer security amount to ten percent (10%) warranty level; 9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and surety. Release Labor and Materials and Subdivision Monumentation Securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 21818 (located westerly of the intersection of Via Norte at Kahwea Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Authorize release of the Labor and Materials security for the Public Improvements in and the Subdivision Monumentation security for Tract No. 21818; 10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6 (located southwesterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials bonds for Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6; 11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and sureties. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F ('located southwesterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities; 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the FY98- 99 Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-07 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-07 - FY98-99 Pavement Management System. Pulled and considered under separate discussion; see page 9. R:\Minutes\051199 6 14 15 16 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersections of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No, PW98-12 - and Margarita Road at Pauba Road - Project No, PW98-13 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the Project Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the construction of traffic signal installations at the intersections of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No. PW98-12 - and Margarita Road at Pauba Road - Project No. PW98-13. Summarily Vacate portions of interior streets in Tract No. 23583 ('located northeasterly of the intersection of North General Kearny Road at Calle Madero) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF CORTE COELHO AND ALL OF CORTE GURULE IN TRACT NO. 23583 SAID RESOLUTION IS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9, OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE Accept Offers of Dedication for Revised portions of interior streets in Tract No. 23583 (located northeasterly of the intersection of North General Kearnv Road at Calle Madero) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR REVISED PORTIONS OF INTERIRO STREETS IN TRACT NO. 23583 (NORTHEAST OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AT CALLE MADERO) BUT NOT INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME R:\Minutes\051199 17 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Engineering Services Agreement with T Y Lin International for the Pala Road Brid.qe Improvement Project - Project No. PW97-15 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve Amendment No. 3 to Professional Engineering Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and T Y Lin International to provide additional Engineering Services for the Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project - Project No. PW97-15 - in an amount not to exceed $16,270.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment I%1o. 3. Pulled and considered under separate discussion; see page 9. 18 Rancho California Road/I-15 and Winchester Road/I-15 Additional Improvements - Project No. PW98-07A and PW98-08A RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit construction bids for additional ramp improvements at Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW98- 07A- and Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW98-08A. 19 Authorization to advertise for Proposals to Study the Street and Traffic Circulation System of the Meadowview Area RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to advertise for proposals to study the street and traffic circulation system of the Meadowview Area. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 5 Award of Contract for two Compacl Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartrid.cle Tape Library Backup System RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award a contract for two Compaq Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartridge Tape Library Backup System to Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., Riverside, California, in the amount of $91,933.42; 5.2 Appropriate $91,994 in General Fund Reserves. For Councilman Comerchero, City Clerk Jones clarified the depreciation schedule for computer equipment and advised that the City's current equipment is Y2K compliant but that the City is rapidly approaching capacity with its current servers. Assistant City Manager O'Grady noted that although the City depreciates its equipment on a three-year cycle, replacement would not be recommended prior to the need. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:~vlinutes\051199 8 13 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the FY98-99 Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-07 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-07 - FY98-99 Pavement Management System. With regard to this issue, Councilman Lindemans apprised staff that, in Voorburg, all bicycle paths, for visibility and safety reasons, are painted red. Mr. Lindemans encouraged staff to pursue such action. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 17 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Eng neering Services AGreement with T Y Lin International for the Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project- Project No. PW97-15 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve Amendment No. 3 to Professional Engineering Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and T Y Lin International to provide additional Engineering Services for the Pala Bridge Improvement Project - Project No. PW97-15 - in an amount not to exceed $16,270.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 3. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Acting Public Works Director Hughes clarified the proposed request and advised that this expenditure was one which was unforeseeable. In the future, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that any similar requests for which the 10% contingency amount has been exceeded that the staff report clearly reflect the reasoning for each amendment. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who voted n._9. At 8:02 P.M., the Council briefly recessed the meeting and convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 8:24 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business. COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 Rancho California Road/I-15 and Winchester Road/I-15 Additional Improvements - Project No. PW98-07A and PW98-08A RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit construction bids for additional ramp improvements at Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No, PW98-07A - and Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW98- 08A. R:%Minutes\051199 9 By way of overheads, Acting Public Works Director Hughes clarified the proposed improvements and the impacts it will have on existing landscaping as well as the irrigation system. Even if it meant to prolong the project, Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his desire to have all work completed at night in an effort to minimize the inconvenience to residents. In light of the penalties which will be imposed on the contractor if the work were not completed on time, Acting Public Works Director Hughes noted that a portion of the work will have to be completed at night. Further clarifying the proposed project, Mr. Hughes, for Councilman Comerchero, commented on the positive impact this project will have on turning movements for Ynez Road and Winchester Road. Both Councilmen Comerchero and Lindemans concurred with Mayor Pro Tem Stone's suggestion to complete all work at night. Mr. Hughes further clarified that a combination of night and day work would complete the project by October 1, 1999, and that restricting the project to night work only would delay the project by approximately 15 to 25 days and that it would as well increase the bid cost by approximately 30%. At a minimum, Councilman Roberts requested that there be no lane closures during peak traffic hours. It was the consensus of the City Council to not close any lanes prior to 10:00 A.M. For Councilman Lindemans, Acting 'Public Works Director Hughes elaborated on bike/pedestrian lanes, clarifying that bike lanes require a 5' space and must be provided in both directions, therefore, requiring additional space of 10'. Mr. Hughes advised that no such lanes have been provided for Rancho California Road or Winchester Road. He clarified that bicycles are not prohibited from utilizing the roadway but that there will not be a designated bike lane. As to pedestrian access, Mr. Hughes noted that both Winchester Road and Rancho California Road have pedestrian crossing on one side. As to the Overland Project, Mr. Hughes noted that no bike lanes will be provided but that pedestrian access will be provided on the north side but not on the south side. Mayor Ford relayed his concurrence with Mr. Hughes' recommendation to have the contractor complete this project during day and night hours but that there be no lane closures during peak hours. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the addition that there be no lane closures prior to 10:00 A.M. 19 Authorization to advertise for Proposals to Study the Street and Traffic Circulation System of the Meadowview Area RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council authorize the Public Works Department to advertise for proposals to study the street and traffic circulation system of the Meadowview Area, Councilman Roberts noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. Acting Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record). R:\Minutes\051199 10 Addressing the importance of neighborhood workshops/meetings in order to adequately address the noted concerns/issues, Assistant City Manager O'Grady commented on the staff time associated with such meetings and suggested that this matter be considered in conjunction with the CIP process and that the matter be as well considered in conjunction with the City-wide Circulation Element. Being of the opinion that a more comprehensive study would be necessary to adequately reflect the positive and negative impacts to surrounding communities, Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated that such a study should include Roripaugh and Calle Medusa and noted that such a study would require a greater expenditure. Mr. Rolfe Wittman, 30617 Calle Pina Colada, resident of Meadowview, relayed his desire to obtain relief from the cut-through traffic; commented on the negative impacts the Mall traffic will have on Meadowview; and further elaborated on the existing substandard roads in Meadowview. Concurring with Mr. Wittman, Mr. Andrew Ronie, 40575 La Colina. further elaborated on the problem of cut-through through in Meadowview. Although concurring with the need of a more comprehensive study, Mr. Ronie stated that at this point in time, such a study would not be justifiable and suggested that the matter be considered with the City-wide Circulation Element and that it should include nearby County developments. Viewing this situation with Meadowview as an on-going problem, Councilman Comerchero noted that it will not be resolved until the City clearly identifies Meadowview as a rural community or as an integral part of the City. Councilman Lindemans, echoed by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, noted that the Meadowview residents would prefer to be labeled as a rural community and that the City should respect those residents' wishes. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved that this matter be consider in conjunction with the CIP process and that the item be appropriately prioritized. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who abstained. 20 Chardonnav Hills Final Pavement Status RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Oral Report. Providing an overview, Acting Public Works Director Hughes advised that negotiations and discussions are ensuing with Lennar and that the City Council will be kept apprised. Mr. David Mathewson, 31293 Durney Court, extended appreciation to the City and staff for the expediency with which this matter was addressed. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to receive and file the report. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:~vlinutes\051199 11 21 Consideration of ADpointment of Water Subcommittee Members RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Appoint an ad-hoc subcommittee of two City Council members to meet with the Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts as appropriate to discuss various water issues. Assistant City Manager O'Grady presented the staff report (of record) after which the following motion was offered: MOTION: Mayor Ford moved to appoint Councilmembers Comerchero and Roberts. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 22 Creation of a No Parking Zone on Avenida De La Reina RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING NO PARKING ZONE ON AVENIDA DE LA REINA BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. TO 9:00 A.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A · Acting Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record). Although supporting the no parking restriction, Mayor Pro Tern Stone commented on the rights of those individuals, residing on this street, that may be impacted and suggested the implementation of a parking permit to which Mr, Hughes advised that the Commission had addressed parking permit process, Considering the distance of the proposed no parking zone, Mr. Hughes, for Councilman Comerchero, advised that the Commission had expressed no concern with the possibility of the traffic concern migrating further north and, thereby, creating a similar problem on Arroya Vista and Corte Alhambra. Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner Connerton further elaborated the Commission's rationale with Acting Public Works Director Hughes noting that if a problem were to arise further north, the matter would be addressed by the Commission. If a problem were to arise for the residents, Mayor Pro Tem Stone reiterated that he would recommend the use of a parking permit. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes\051199 12 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT In light of Acting City Manager Nelson's absence, Assistant City Manager O'Grady wished Mr. Nelson a speedy recovery; commented on the continual progress with the Overland Overcrossing Project; and commended the Guidant Corporation, Southern California Edison, and the Public Works staff on a job well done. Mr. O'Grady as well commended the Community Services Department on a job well done as it relates to the progress of the Duck Pond Project. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act; that direction was provided to staff with respect to the one item of litigation; advised that the settlement agreement will be readdressed by the City Council for review in Open Session; and noted that no action was taken on the personnel matter. ADJOURNMENT At 9:33 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, May 25, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula California. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\051199 13 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MAY 25, 1999 CLOSED SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of existing litigation involving the City and/or the Agency. The following cases/claims will be discussed: (a) Blind Pig Brewery and (b) Claims of Westside City I & II, LLP (Bill Dendy). Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) and (c) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 43455 Business Park Drive, Temecula. The negotiating parties are City of Temecula and Optical Disc Media. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and James O'Grady, The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, and Ford. Absent: Councilmember: Roberts. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Jared Reed· INVOCATION The invocation was given by Reverend Pat Campbell· ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Stone. R:\Minutes\052599 1 In light of their upcoming trip to Japan and in appreciation for the City Council's support of this trip, the Temecula Valley High School Choir sang the National Anthem as well as the National Anthem for Japan. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Certificates of Achievement for obtaining Eagle Scout Mayor Ford recognized the following individuals for attaining the Eagle Scout rank and Mayor Pro Tem Stone presented each with a Certificate of Achievement: Kevin McClintock David Carreon Jeff Santos Mike Jenkins Tim Jenkins Matt Tonkins Certificates of Appreciation to Temecula Valley Hi.clh School Choir Thanking Choir Director Aamodt and each Choir Member for their performance and wishing each a memorable trip to Japan, Certificates of Appreciation were presented to the following Choir Member: Briana Schultz Sebastian Rodriguez Tanner Palmer Saweah Mayson Reese Madison Numair Khaled Erica Hilberg Janet Gorman Cheri Gorin Sara Forgy Valerie Flynt Brooke Faldmo Faith Duitsman Laura Divan Julie Diehi Lindsey Davis Sarah Carlson Jason Buack Michelle Beaupain Aracely Ambriz Selena Tourtillotte On behalf of the Choir, Director Aamodt thanked and expressed appreciation to the Council for its support. R:\Minutes~052599 National Mental Health Month Proclamation Mayor Ford so proclaimed the month of May as National Mental Health Month and a proclamation was accepted by Mr. Peter Moyes. PUBLIC COMMENTS Presenting an array of rose bouquets to the City Councilmembers, Ms. Rebecca Weersing, 41775 Yorba Avenue, President of the Temecula Valley Rose Society, expressed appreciation to the City Council, staff, and the citizens for the collective support of the Society's activities; advised that a Youth Garden is being created within the existing Rose Garden (Rose Haven); and invited the Councilmembers and the public to the Annual Rose Show on Saturday, May 29,1999, at the Community Recreation Center. Presenting an official Festival poster, Ms. Martha Minkler, representing the Arts Council of the Temecula Valley, thanked the Council for its continued support; referenced the various upcoming activities; introduced Ms. Sherry Smith the designer of this year's and last year's poster; and invited the Councilmembers and public to attend Arts in the Country (June 4 - 13, 1999). In honor of the Veterans, Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, invited the Councilmembers and the public to the Memorial Day Services on Monday, May 31, 1999, at the Temecula Cemetery. By way of an overhead, Mr. Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico, and Ms. Jamie Jeffers, 31646 Pio Pico, addressed their concern of retaining a four-way stop at Pio Pico versus the installation of a traffic signal until Meadows Parkway has been connected and the Paseo del Sol traffic has been diverted to SR 79. Although the proposed traffic signal has gone to bid, Acting Public Works Director Hughes advised that the project has not been awarded to which Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the matter be reagendized in order for the City Council to reendorse the validity of the traffic signal. It was the consensus of the City Council to concur with Mayor Pro Tem Stone's recommendation. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. In Councilman Roberts' absence, Councilman Comerchero advised that he had attended the Budget Implementation Committee Meeting for RCTC, noting that the $111 million budget was approved at that meeting. Mr. Comerchero commented on the gross inequity of RCTC's appropriations of Measure A funds, advising that he will further address the issues with Councilman Roberts, B. In response to the Council's discussion several months ago, Councilman Comerchero advised that a Wall of Honor will be constructed and located in the rotunda of the new museum and that Committee discussions will ensue. C. Considering this December will be the 10th Anniversary of the City of Temecula, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the Community Services Commission consider and review the planning of a celebration. D. Mayor Ford encouraged the Councilmembers and the public to attend the upcoming Memorial Day Services at the Temecula Cemetery. R:\Minutes\052599 E. For the public, Mayor Ford advised that Councilman Roberts will not be in attendance of this evening's meeting in order to attend other City-related business. F. Mayor Ford advised that Agenda Item No. 17 (Cox Communications) will be continued to the June 8, 1999, City Council meeting. SUBSEQUENT NEED ITEM City Attorney Thorson advised that a request has come before the City Council to consider housing issues at the Temecula Villas; noted that it would be appropriate for the City Council to make a motion to declare a subsequent need in light of time limits with respect to determining whether or not to provide assistance to the potentially displaced residents; and requested that direction be given to staff after which the Item would be agendized for a future City Council meeting for an official determination. Because Mayor Pro Tern Stone's property is a considerable distance from the property of discussion and because the Council is not considering the purchase or sale of the property, City Attorney Thorson advised that Mayor Pro Tem Stone may participate in the discussion and vote relative to this Item. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to consider the Temecula Villas as a subsequent need item. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent. CONSENT CALENDAR I Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of April 13, 1999; 2.2 Approve the minutes of April 20, 1999. 3 Resolution ADDroving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:\Minutes\052599 4 4 5 Award of Construction Contract for Maintenance Facility - Second Floor Remodel Project - Phase II RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 4.2 Award a construction contract for the Second Floor Remodel Project - Phase II - to Rasmussen Brothers Construction in the amount of $70,700.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract amount. Street Name Chan~le from Ynez Road to Ynez Court RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP 22714 YNEZ ROAD TO YNEZ COURT This Item was pulled and considered for separate discussion; see page 8. Agreement for Design Services - Maintenance Facility Improvements - Phase III RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve an Agreement between Davidson + Allen Architects and the City of Temecula for architectural and structural design services for Maintenance Facility Improvements - Phase III- in the amount of $31,875.00; 6.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Temecula. Purchase of two (2) Public Works' Vehicles RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the purchase of two (2) Dodge model year 2000, full-sized vehicles from Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge in the amount of $58,831.50. Purchase of one (1) Fire Department Rescue Sauad Vehicle RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the purchase of one (1) 1999 Fire Rescue Squad vehicle from Raceway Ford in the amount of $49,125.00; R:\Minutes\052599 5 8.2 Approve a transfer from Development Impact Fee Fire Mitigation in the amount of $49,125.00, 9 10 11 12 Release Labor and Materials Securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 24131-2 (located southwesterly of Meadows Parkway at McCabe Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize release of the Labor and Materials Securities for the public improvements in Tract No. 24131-2; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 28309 (located on the south side of Nicolas Road easterly of North General Kearnv Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept the public improvements including subdivision monumentation in Tract No. 28309; 10.2 Authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to the 10% warranty level, initiation of the one-year warranty period, and release of the subdivision monumentation security; 10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract No. 28309 ('located on the south side of Nicolas Road easterIv of North General Kearn¥ Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 28309) Tract Map No. 23101-5 (located south of La Serena Way, east of Meadows Parkway, west of Butterfield Stage Road, and north of Rancho California Road in the Margarita Villa.ee Specific Plan No. 199 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23101-5 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 12.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; R:\Minutes\052599 12.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. 13 Tract Map No. 23100-6 ('located south of La Serena Way, east of Meadows Parkway, west of Butterfield Stage Road, and north of Rancho California Road in Margarita Villa.ae Specific Plan No. 199 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23100-6 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 13.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 13.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. 14 Parcel Map No. 29060 (located north of Rancho California Road and west of Humber Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29060 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 14.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 14.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. 15 Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement - Pala Road Bridge Improvement Proiect - Project No. PW97-15 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve a Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. for materials testing and inspection for Pala Road Bridge - Project No. PW97-15 - in the amount of $78,758.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 15.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,875.80, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. 16 Authorization to Solicit Public Construction Bids for Old Town First Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek - Proiect No. PW95-08 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit construction bids for the Old Town First Street Bridge and related roadway improvements - Project No. PW95-08. Mayor Pro Tern Stone abstained with regard to this Item. Mayor Pro Tem Stone extended appreciation to staff for expediting the purchase of one Fire Department Rescue Squad Vehicle. R:\Minutes\052599 7 MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-4 and 6-15 (Item No. 5 was pulled for separate discussion). The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberrs who was absent and Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained with regard to Item No. 16 (Old Town First Street Bridge). CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 5 Street Name Change from Ynez Road to Ynez Court RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP 22714 YNEZ ROAD TO YNEZ COURT By way of overheads, Chief Building Official Elmo clarified the recommendation; reviewed the staff report (of record); noted that the proposed street name change was intended to eliminate confusion for emergency response; advised that parcels 1 - 12 will be included in this street name change; and informed the Councilmembers that the associated lot owners and existing businesses expressed no concern with regard to this recommendation. At 8:05 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 9:11 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business. PUBLIC HEARING 17 Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0219 (Conditional Use Permit) - Cox Communications Wireless Personal Communications System (PCS) with antennas mounted atop a 60-foot high monopole disguised as an evergreen pine tree (monopine) at the Rancho California Water District water tank site at 3100 Rancho California Road RECOM MEN DATION: 17.1 Adopt the Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA98-0219; 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:Vvlinutes\052599 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98- 0219 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0219 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO CONSTRUCT A WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (PCS) FACILITY CONSISTING OF TWELVE (12) PANEL ANTENNAS, ONE (1) GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) ANTENNA, AND S IX (6) CABINETS HOUSING A BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (BTS) UNIT AND OTHER ELECTRONIC AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT. THE ANTENNAS WILL BE MOUNTED ATOP A 60-FOOT HIGH MONOPOLE DISGUISED AS AN EVERGREEN PINE TREE (MONOPINE) LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WATER TANK SITE AT 3100 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-060- 022 MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to continue this public hearing to the June 8, 1999, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberrs who abstained. COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 Old Town Local Review Board Appointment RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Appoint two members and one alternate to serve full terms on the Old Town Local Review Board. Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this Item. City Clerk Jones presented the staff report (of record) after which the following motion was offered: MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to reappoint Mr. Walt Allen and to appoint Mr. Carl Ross and Mr. Otto Baron as an alternate. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent and Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained. 19 City Council Chambers Policy RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Provide direction for the use of the City Council Chambers. Community Services Director Parker reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material); requested City Council direction; and advised that this item would be reagendized for the June 22, 1999, City Council meeting. R:\Minutes\052599 Councilman Lindemans noted that, in his opinion, the Chamber should not be utilized by anyone wishing to announce his or her candidacy and that governmental uses, as described in the staff report, should be permitted. Councilman Comerchero suggested that the usage of the Chamber for non-profit organizations should be limited to whether or not there may be a need for live broadcast and requested that no usage of the Chamber be permitted until an official policy has been adopted. Considering the City Hall building was paid for by the citizens of this City, Mayor Pro Tern Stone was of the opinion that an incumbent Councilmember should be permitted to announce his or her candidacy as long as associated fees are paid by the incumbent. With regard to non-profit organizations, including the Temecula Valley School District, Mr. Stone was of the opinion that these organizations should be permitted to utilize the facility as long as there is no conflict with a governmental meeting. Councilman Lindemans noted that the School District should be apprised and permitted to utilize City Council Chambers for its monthly meetings. Clarifying the Council's intent, City Attorney Thorson stated that the Council may allow governmental groups and non-profit community and governmental groups. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to direct staff to formulate a City Council Chamber Policy permitting Chamber usage to governmental groups and community non-profit groups and that no Chamber usage be permitted until a policy has been adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans. (Councilman Lindemans withdrew his second to this motion; see below). Following additional discussion, Councilman Lindemans withdrew his second to the above- mentioned motion after which Councilman Comerchero restated his motion. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to direct staff to formulate a City Council Chamber Policy permitting Chamber usage to governmental and community non-profit groups and that no Chamber usage should be permitted until the adoption of a policy. The motion was seconded by Mayor Ford and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Lindemans who abstained and Councilman Roberts who was absent. 20 Sidewalk Project - Nicolas Road (Requested by Councilman Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Oral report. Advising of the existing approved Tentative Map which has been conditioned to provide the sidewalk at the time of development, Acting Public Works Director Hughes advised that because no development activity has been proposed, the matter has been included in the Capital Improvement Project; that staff has applied for AB 821 funding; and that a reimbursement agreement is being discussed with the City Attorney. Mayor Pro Tem Stone reiterated previously made Council comments with regard to a reimbursement agreement and requested that staff pursue the matter with the associated property owners. R:\Minutes\052599 10 SUBSEQUENT NEED ITEM (Previously approved for discussion; see page 4). 21 Temecula Villas Housing Redevelopment Manager Meyer presented an overview of the item, advising that Temecula Villas had a 20-year contract with the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development to provide 48 affordable units; that this contract will expire on June 21, 1999; and that to date, there are seven individuals who have not secured housing after the contract expires. Having analyzed the impacted individuals' situation, Mr. Meyer advised that it would be staff's recommendation to relocate these individuals to Rancho West but noted that there may or may not be units available to accommodate these individuals by the time the contract expires. Further addressing possible options for these residents, Mr. Meyer suggested that a formal funding package be agendized and considered by the Council at the June 8,1999, City Council meeting. City Council discussion ensued during which possible options were considered with Mayor Pro Tem Stone suggesting that it be determined whether affordable housing may be available on a temporary basis in neighboring cities. Mr. Meyer noted that no other HUD contracts will be expiring until the year 2004. Acting City Manager Nelson noted that this matter may further be addressed at the June 10, 1999, CIP Workshop. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to direct staff to formulate a policy for the June 8, 1999, City Council meeting, which would provide emergency grant monies to subsidize the residents who will be displaced from Temecula Villas until availability at Mission Village. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS No additional comments. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT In light of ongoing construction due to the Overland Overcrossing Project, Acting Public Works Director Hughes advised of upcoming freeway closures (June 7 -11, 1999) and briefly commented on alternate routes. Acting City Manager Nelson reiterated the City's goal to complete the Overcrossing Project prior to the opening of the Mall and commended the Public Works Department on a job well done with regard to expediting this project as well as the Duck Pond project. Mr. Nelson commended the Finance Department on the receipt of another Award of Excellence, noting that a formal presentation would be made at the June 8, 1999, City Council meeting. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson noted that there was no reportable action. With regard to the three litigation items, Mr. Thorson advised that the Agency provided direction and that the real property item will be considered for approval by the City Council in Open Session. R:\Minutes\052599 11 ADJOURNMENT At 9:50 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adiourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, June 8, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula California. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\052599 12 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,919,390.57. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Reso~ 99- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clark of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22rid day of June, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Re~o~ CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 06/03/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/10/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/22/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/10/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TO,1AL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 06/22/99 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194. 210 261 280 300 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COIvlV~NITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CARTAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 N::)MIN EXPENSE FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY..CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 100 GENERAL 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 19~ TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 2 0 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: I ~WN N'ELSON, ACTING CITY MANA~~ER 1.193,144.93 140,963.35 124,958.31 4,605 138.40 28,444.52 840.16 1,172,950.45 65.20 35,406.19 2,118.84 10,769.84 3,718.95 13,204.13 138,664.65 3,749.45 31,538.29 67.19 169.78 2,160.80 959.28 1,838.26 670.86 3,348.13 1,395.39 3,498.42 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLO~NING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 328,484.25 378,213.35 2,024,631.51 198,061.45 2,919,395.57 2,731,329.11 165,061.45 2,919,390.57 VOUCHRE2 06/0't/99 08:44 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOI.//MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AHOUNT 75,517.33 1,328.88 25,505.24 2,448.83 71,45 877.03 202,280.19 7,535.25 209.17 4,450.18 347.32 7,524,76 TOTAL 328,484.25 VOUCHRE2 06/03/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 55984 55984 5598/+ 55984 55985 55986 55987 55987 55988 55991 55992 55993 55994 55995 55995 55995 55996 55997 55997 55998 55999 56000 56001 56002 56002 56003 56003 56003 56003 56003 56003 56004 56004 O8:44 CHECK DATE 05/28/99 05/28/99 05/28/99 05/28/99 05/28/99 05/28/99 06/02/99 06/02/99 06/02/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 VENDOR NUMBER 003376 003376 003376 003376 003703 003703 001159 001159 001587 000745 000102 001323 001323 001323 003203 002541 002950 001054 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 002782 002782 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR NAME ARTS COUNCIL, THE ARTS COUNCIL, THE ARTS COUNCIL, THE ARTS COUNCIL, THE BEL AIR CAMERA BEL AIR CAMERA CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST GREAT RACE LLC APWA ITEM DESCRIPTION TCKT:MAYOR BALL JS/JC/KL/SN/GT TCKT:MAYOR BALL JSIJCIKLISNIGT TCKT:MAYOR BALL JSIJC/KL/SN/GT TCKT:MAYOR BALL JS/JC/KL/SN/GT DEPST:CAMERA RENTAL FOR MUSEUM EQUIP & CAMERA RENTAL:MUSEUM PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS HOST AGRNNT PARTICIPATION FEE SEMINAR:WATER 1SSUES:6/15/99 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT ALTA LONA CHARTER LINES TRANSPORTATION FOR SISTER CITY AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C FENCE RENTAL:APR-JUL:MUSEUM ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL DRINKING WATER FOR CRC DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE MERCHANDISE TO SELL AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUT ADDITIONAL ROOM RENTAL BALTODANO, MARIA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT BECKER, WALTER KARL INSTALL SIDEWALKS:OLD TOWN BODY THERAPEUTICS SUNSCREEN FOR AQUATIC STAFF CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF SEM:ELEC/MECH CODE:6/16/99 CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HIG REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HIG ADDITIONAL ROOM/KITCHEN USE CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER SIGN:HANDICAP STALL:R.C,SPT PK CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGN: VAN ACCESSIBLE CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGN:WARNING FOUL BALL TERR]TO CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER NISC HARDWARE CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER HANDICAP ANCHORS CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SALES TAX CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS 20'DOZ DE'BEER SOFTBALLS 'CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS FREIGHT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-100-999'5260 001-110-999-5260 001-161-999'5260 001-1990 190-1652 210-190'808-5804 001'150'999-5250 190-180'999-5250 280-199-999-5362 001-163-999-5261 001-170-999-5208 001-101-999-5280 210-190-808-5804 340-199-701-5250 190-182-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 001-2175 190-2900 190-183-4990 190-2900 001-1(~.-601-5402 190-183-999-5310 001-162-999-5258 190-2900 190-183-4990 190'180'999'5244 190-180-999-5244 190-180'999-5244 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-5244 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 ITEM AMOUNT 225.00 75.00 40.18 34.82 5,300.00 275.93 84.00 252.00 2,000.00 105.00 149.41 263.31 285.00 49.76 28.61 153.66 477.33 100.00 40.00- 100.00 1,900.00 120.60 65.00 100.00 30,00- 88.50 44.25 183.50 359.20 150.00 63.97 680.00 70.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 375.00 5,300.00 275.93 336.00 2,000.00 105.00 149.41 263.31 285,00 232,03 477,33 60.00 100.00 1,900.00 120.60 65.00 70,00 889.42 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/05/99 08:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56004 06/03/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOOOS SALES TAX 190-183-999-5380 52.70 56004 06/03/99 002782 CH]CK#S SPORTING GOODS 15-002 DE-BEER SOFTBALLS 190-183-999-5380 592.50 56004 06/03/99 002782 CHICK~S SPORTING GO00S FREIGHT 190-183-999-5380 52.50 56004 06/03/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GO00S SALES TAX 190-18]-999-5380 45.92 56005 06/03/99 001233 DANES FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS 001-164-601-5218 25.33 1,493.62 25.33 56006 06/0]/99 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE RETAIN PUBLIC ADVOCACY FIRM 001-110-999-5248 4,000.00 4,000.00 56007 06/0]/99 DAY, EDWARD REFD:BUILDING PERMIT B98-1070 001-2290 .50 56007 06/03/99 OAY, EDWARD REFD:BUILDING PERMIT B98-1070 001-162-4285 50.]0 50.80 56008 06/03/99 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 86.80 86.80 56009 06/0]/99 002981 DYNA MED MED EXTRICATION DEVICE W/CASE 190-183-999-5310 58.85 56009 06/03/99 002981 OYNA MEO FIRST AID SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 26.00 56009 06/03/99 002981 OYNA NED FIRST AIO SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 14.50 56009 06/0]/99 002981 OYNA MED FIRST AIO SUPPLIES 190-18]-999-5310 21.00 56009 06/0]/99 002981 .DYNA MEO FIRST AID SUPPLIES 190-18]-999-5310 19.40 56009 06/0]/99 002981 DYNA MED SALES TAX 190-18]-999-5310 10.8] 150.58 56010 06/0]/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/21 MILES 001-16]-999-5118 56010 06/0]/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/21 MILES 001-165-999-5118 324.5] 56010 06/03/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/21 MILES 001-164-604-5118 324.54 56010 06/03/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/21THORNSLEY 001-161-999-5118 2,098.40 56011 06/03/99 003468 FINDLEY REPORTS INC., T DEPOSIT REPT FOR BUDGET DOC 001-140-999-5228 50.00 3,072.00 50.00 56012 06/03/99 000170 FIL~NKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-161-999-5220 105.45 56012 06/03/99 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-161-999-5220 31.31 136,76 56013 06/03/99 FUZIE, ALIX REFUND: TOT PRE-DANCE 190-183-4982 85.00 85.00 56014 06/03/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-6506 JEFF STONE 320-199-999-5208 25.09 56014 06/03/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM ]20-199-999-5208 82.]8 56014 06/03/99 00018/+ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 90969]-0956 GENERAL ~SAGE ]20-199-999-5208 5].92 56014 06/03/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4356 K.HINTERGARDT PRK 320-199-999-5208 30.2] 56014 06/0]/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-8927 GENERAL USAGE ]20-199-999-5208 27.46 56015 06/03/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR 001-150-999-5220 182.98 56015 06/0]/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR 001-150-999-5220 108,88 219.08 291,86 56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (20) CARTRIDGES 320-199-999-5221 1,319.80 56016 06/03/99 000192 'GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (2) CD-R DISKETTE 50PK 320-199-999-5221 226.00 56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (3) ANTISTATIC WIPES 320-199-999-5221 11.97 56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 55.75 56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX ]20-199-999-5221 122.78 56017 06/03/99 GREEN, SUSIE REFD: EXERCISE-KUNDALINI YOGA 190-183-4982 30.00 1,736.30 30.00 56018 06/03/99 HUMPHREY, DOUGLAS REFUND: EXERCISE-HATHA YOGA 190-183-4982 37.00 37.00 VOUCHRE2 06/03/99 08:44 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 56019 06/03/99 000388 I C B O, INC. PUB:UNIFORM BLDG CODE:147H97 001-162-999-5228 70.04 70.04 56020 06/03/99 001429 56020 06/03/99 001429 56020 06/03/99 001429 INACON INFORMATION SYST INACON INFORMATION SYST INACON INFORMATION SYST TOSHIBA AC ADAPTER 320-199-999-5221 FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 476.00 3.78 37.19 516.97 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX CEDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDO) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) 56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 001-2070 000444 SDI 165-2070 000444 SDI 190-2070 000444 SDI 280-2070 000444 SDI 320-2070 000444 SDI 330-2070 000444 SDI 340-2070 000444 STATE 001-2070 000444 STATE 165-2070 000444 STATE 190-2070 000444 STATE 191-2070 000444 STATE 192-2070 000444 STATE 193-2070 000444 STATE 194-2070 000444 STATE 280-2070 000444 STATE 300-2070 000444 STATE 320-2070 000444 STATE 330-2070 000444 STATE 340-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 FEOERAL 165-2070 56022 06/03/99 00028:3 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 -INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 194-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 300-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL -- 320-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 340-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 165-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 190-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 191-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 192-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEOICARE 193-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 194-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 340-2070 78.80 2.99 55.40 .74 3.50 3.66 3.10 5,282.66 110.81 857.46 1.48 3.53 57.26 21.69 42.65 12.08 194,18 26.56 110.93 19,673.49 384.15 3,863.84 8.70 22.03 299.72 126.61 132.69 41.94 790.82 124.26 511.86 4,962.23 135.42 1,135.9? 2.43 6.18 76.60 34.38 56.48 24.17 165.62 49.50 128.36 6,869.48 32,757.45 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/03/99 08:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56023 06/03/99 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 177.7~ 177.79 56024 06/03/99 IRONS, KAREN REFD: GOLF LESSONS BEG 190-183-4982 50.00 50.00 56025 06/03/99 003683 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC 1- TDC-8 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECT 001-164-602-5Z4Z 1,850.00 56025 06/03/99 003683 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC FREIGHT 001-164-602-5242 15.00 1,865.00 56026 06/03/99 002575 JONES, SUSAN W. REIMB: INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 001-120-999-5260 32.72 32.72 56027 06/03/99 003501 K C DEVELOPMENT FACADE IMPROV PRGM: KRIEGER'S 280-199-813-5804 5,000.00 5,000.00 56028 06/03/99 002909 K W C ENGINEERING, INC. MAY DESIGN SVCS R.C. SPRT PRK 210-190-154-5802 21.25 21.25 56029 06/03/99 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 84.80 56029 06/03/99 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 162.14 56029 06/03/99 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 288.68 535.62 56030 06/03/99 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LDSC & MAINT SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 20.58 20.58 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE RESO, ORD & MINUTE BOOKS 001-120-999-5220 773.20 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 31.80 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 26.50 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 47.70 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE CUSTOM TABS FOR BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 20.00 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE SALES TAX 001-120-999-5220 69.69 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE BINDERS FOR PERMANENT RECORDS 001-120-999-5220 193.30 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE CUSTOM TABS FOR BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 20.00 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE AGENCY NAME PRINTED ON BINDER 001-120-999-5220 13.25 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 15.90 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE SALES TAX 001-120-999-5220 18.79 56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE FREIGHT 001-120-999-5220 21.07 1,251.20 56032 06/03/99 LORD, WILLIAM REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER RENTAL 190-183-4988 25.00 25.00 56033 06/03/99 LSA ASOCIATES, INC. OVERPAYMENT OF PLANNING FEES 001-2650 7.00 7.00 56034 06/03/99 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 352,80 352.80 56035 06/03/99 MEDINA, TINA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 56035 06/03/99 .MEOINA, TINA ADD'L HOURS FOR RCX)M RENTAL 190-183-4990 25.00- 75. O0 56036 06/03/99 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 320.00 56036 06/03/99 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 160.00 480,00 56037 06/03/99 003241 MILLAR HEATING & AIR, I ELECTRICAL SVCS:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 1,200.00 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 25,089.23 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 693.64 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,438.76 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.28 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 33.93 1,200.00 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA 06/03/99 08:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 'PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 56038 06/03/99 000Z46 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET]RE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-Z390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET]RE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 S6038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 402.62 196.69 301 130.52 821.85 142.41 491.04 100.6/+ 2.81 5.62 39.33 8.43 76.7'5 1.87 14.82 ,05 .14 1.50 .84 .92 .46 1.86 .93 2,18 33,014,87 56040 06/03/99 000894 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS, OFFICE SUPPLIES:PLANNING DEPT 001-1990 400.21 400.21 56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATES:PLANNING COMM. 001-161-999-5222 56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATES:TRAFFIC SAFETY COMM 001-164-602-5222 56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATES:COMM. SVC. COMM. 190-180-999-5222 56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATE HOLOERS:COUNCIL 001-100-999-5220 93.47 93.47 93.47 12.94 293.35 56042 06/03/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-99-OZOO3-O:FLOATING MTR 001-164-601-5250 302.63 56042 06/03/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O2-79-10100-1:NW SPORTS PK 190-1270 315.26 617.89 56043 06/03/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214 56043 06/03/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 340-199-701-5214 19.50 6.00 25.50 56044 06/03/99 003708 RIVERSIDE CO BUILDING S PROP. ACQUISITION:S79/LA PAZ 210-165-693-5700 187,530.00 187,530.00 56045 06/03/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION REDUCE RET.5%:WINCH/I-15:97-03 210-2035 14,168.01 14,168.01 56046 06/03/99 001288 SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOUR ADVERTISEMENTS:ECON. DEV. 001'111-999-5270 2,500.00 2,500.00 56047 06/03/99 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY OPERATING PERMIT CRC GENERATOR 190-182-999-5250 175.60 175.60 56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:2-11-OOT-O455:6TH ST 001-164-603-5240 291.84 56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:2-O6-105-O654:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319 1,892.17 56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:Z-14-204-1615:FRNT ST RDIO 340-199-701-5240 19.55 56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON MAY:2-19-184-1824:RANCHO CALF. 191-180-999-5319 166.17 56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON MAY:Z-15-830-Z307:FRONT ST 190-199-999-5240 39.00 VOUCHRE2 06/03/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56048 56049 56050 56051 56052 56052 56052 56052 56052 56053 08:44 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 06/03/99 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 003654 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO TEMECULA LEARNING CENTE 003140 -TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKI. ION 003031 003031 003031 003031 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TVUSD CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION MAY:2-18-937-3152:MORENO RD MAY:2-19-111-4834:BEDFORD TC1 NAY:Z-O2-351-4946:SENIOR CTR NAY:Z-OO-397-5042:CITY HALL MAY:Z-18-O49-6416:FRONT ST PED MAY:2-19-321-6512:RANCHO CALF. NAY:2-18-555-7006:MORENO RD TC MAY:2-18-799-7911:MORENO RD TC MAY:2-OZ-502-8077:NAINT. FAC. MAY:2-19-171-8568:TEM.WED,CHPL MAY:64-77-350-1600-91:MCCABE EQUIPMENT RENTAL:T,V.MUSEUM FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 12LB DELINEATORS SALES TAX SAFETY VESTS:PW MAINT CREW CREDIT: SERVICE CHARGE CREDIT: RETURNED MERCHANDISE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-185 -999- 5240 191-180-999-5319 190-181-999-5240 340 - 199- 701 - 524 O 001 ' 164'603'5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 340-1990 190 - 185 - 999 - 5240 190 - 180 - 999 - 5240 190-185-999-5415 001-101-999-5267 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5Z42 190-180-999-5242 001-164-601-5218 190-180-999-5242 001-164-601-5218 190-2900 ITEM AMOUNT 77.95 82.22 747.50 4,219.43 179.85 116.43 106.17 56.92 628.89 37.79 2,086.43 675.00 2,000.00 60.00 380.00 29.45 187.49 20.00- 187.49- 109.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 10,748.31 675.00 2,000.00 60.00 389.45 109.00 TOTAL CHECKS 328,484.25 VOUCNRE2 06/10/99 12:10 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 14 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~//MOD SET ASIDE 190 CONMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 113,766.11 138,264.62 50,378.70 907.11 66.97 5,379.49 451,52 39,780.69 13,830.89 557.59 6,319.66 3w371.63 5,138.37 TOTAL 378,213.35 VOLICHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12:10' VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56054 06/03/99 COLORADO, UNIVERSITY OF ROOH:MUN CLERKS:7/11-16:BALLRE 001-120-999-5261 704.50 704.50 56055 06/08/99 002652 OSCAR'S CLOSED SESSION MTG REFRESHMENT 001-100-999-5260 126.47 126.47 56056 06/08/99 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 56056 06/08/99 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 001-150-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 42.00 336.00 3?8.00 56057 06/09/99 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 190-180-999-5250 42.00 42.00 56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA/GREEK/JUNE/VISION 001-1180 594,78 29.75 18.58 18.58 661,69 56061 06/10/99 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC. JUN BILLBOARD AD:OLD TUN PRONO 280-199-999-5362 1,700.00 1,700.00 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 CANCER 001-2330 234.50 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 202.13 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 EXP PROT 300-2330 5.47 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 HOSP IC 001-2330 17.50 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 STD 001-2330 660.80 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 STD 190-2330 112.00 56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 STD 300-2330 8.00 1,296.20 56063 06/10/99 002662 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTR SVS TO CAPTURE & CAGE DUCKS 190-180-999-5250 400.00 400.00 56064 06/10/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS COMPUTER SERVER (MUSEUM) 320-1970 2,035.00 56064 06/10/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS SALES TAX 320-1970 157.71 2,192.71 56065 06/10/99 003693 AMERICAN ASSN. OF MUSEU JOB ANNOUNCEMENT AD:MUSEUM MGR 190-185-999-5254 290.40 290.40 56066 06/10/99 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 73.45 73.45 56067 06/10/99 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: B.WEDEKING 190-180-999-5214 43,00 43.00 56068 06/10/99 000122 B S N SPORTS MINI MEGAPHONE FOR SAFETY CONM 001-110-999-5278 235.80 56068 06/10/99 000122 B S N SPORTS FREIGHT 001-110-999-5278 28.30 56068 06/10/99 000122 B S N SPORTS SALES TAX 001-110-999-5278 18.27 282.37 56069 06/10/99 002506 BAILEY'S BLINDS & DRAPE BLINDS:FIRE MARSHALL OFFICE 340-199-701'5250 47.36 47.36 56070 06/10/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SVCS.-SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 90.00 56070 06/10/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER TCC ICE MACHINE (]CE-O-MATIC) 190-184-999-5610 2,195.00 56070 06/10/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 107.00 2,392.00 56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS, CONP INSURANCE 001-2370 3,172.15 56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 165-2370 69.31 56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 190-2370 980.77 56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 191-2370 .66 56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 192-2370 1.66 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 12:10 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/~9 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES NAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 193-2370 MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 194-2370 MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 280'2370 MAY 99 I,IORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 300-2370 MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 320-2370 MAY 99 NORKERS~ CONP INSURANCE 330-2370 MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 340-2370 MAY 99 I,IORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 001-140-999-5112 HAY 99 I,/ORKERS~ CONP INSURANCE 280-199-999-5112 MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 190-181-999-5112 42.75 16.60 25.26 6.17 45.52 12.94 207.08 .48 3.41 4.26 4,589.02 56072 06/10/99 000152 CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:COMMISSIONER 190-180-999-5226 190.00 190.00 56073 06/10/99 005629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAR/APR SVCS:PALA INSPECTIONS 210-165-631-5801 56073 06/10/99 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAY INSPECTION SVCS:PALA RD 210-165-631-5801 1,569.50 2,666.00 4,235.50 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 001-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 165-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 190-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 191-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 192-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 193-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 194-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 280-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 300-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 320-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 330-2360 56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 340-2360 575.26 13.01 103.52 .98 10.57 5.84 6.49 3.24 13.00 6.50 15.26 754.00 56075 06/10/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE REFRESHMENT: STAFF MEETING 001-162-999-5261 119.22 119.22 56076 06/10/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING - CRC 190-182-999-5250 56076 06/10/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING-SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 50.00 45.00 95.00 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 001-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 165-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 190-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 191-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 192-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 193-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 194-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 280-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 300-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 320-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 330-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 340-2380 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 001-2500 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 165-2500 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 190-2500 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 191-2500 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 192-2500 1,335.98 37.20 217.06 .76 1.93 22.98 10.85 16.41 7.12 37.36 8.08 27.53 1,864.79 51.94 302.96 1.06 2.69 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 3 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56077 06/10/99 003553 ClGNA 003553 STD 193-2500 32.07 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 194-2500 15.14 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 280-2500 22.90 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 300-2500 9.94 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 320-2500 52.14 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 330-2500 11.28 56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 340-2500 38.45 4,128.62 56079 06/10/99 002989 CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEA CITY HALL WINDOW CLEANING 340-199-701'5212 385.00 385.00 56080 06/10/99 003184 COACHELLA VALLY HOUSING ANNUAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 165-q99-811-5804 130,000.00 130,000.00 56081 06/10/99 001193 COMP USA, INC. MlSC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 1,231.78 1,231.78 56082 06/10/99 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 69.80 69.80 56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 108.00 56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 83.02 56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- 6TH STREE 001-164-603-5218 656.52 56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- 6TH STREE 001-164-603-5218 986.8] 1,834.37 56084 06/10/99 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. TRAFF.COUNT CONSENSUS:MARG.RD. 001-164-602-5406 56084 06/10/99 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. TRAFF.COUNT CONSENSUS CITYWIDE 001-164-602-5406 180.00 1,105.00 1,285.00 56085 06/10/99 003625 DAVIS, JOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 180.00 180.00 56086 06/10/99 DIABETES ASSOCIATION DONATION ON BEHALF OF B.MCKEON 001-2170 50.00 50.00 56087 06/10/99 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK MAY 99 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE 300-2180 348.72 348.72 56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/09 WIGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 156.00 56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/09 WIGHTMAN 001-150-999-5118 55.25 56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/16 WIGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 260.00 56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/23 WIGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 260.00 56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/30 WIGHTMAN 001-!11-999-5118 260.00 991.25 56089 06/10/99 003610 DOMENOE, JIM REIMB:CD ROM DRIVE:STOREFRONT 001-170-999-5229 64.64 64.64 56090 06/10/99 003719 DOOL, EDWARD LEASE PYMTS APPLIED TO CONSTRU 280-199-4075 10,179.00 56090 06/10/99 003719 DOOL, EDWARD LEASE PYMTS APPLIED TO CONSTRU 001-164-601-5402 250.00- 9,929.00 56091 06/10/99 002466 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY JUNE ELEVATOR SVC/MTNC:C.HALL 340-199-701-5212 202.00 202.00 56092 06/10/99 DUCKWILER, LOURDES REFUND: MUSIC-INSTANT PIANO 190-183-4980 20.00 20.00 56093 06/10/99 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 112.81 112.81 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21WILLIAMS 001-161-999~5118 551.76 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 WILLJAMS 001-162-999-5118 551.76 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/21GORMAN 001-162-999-5118 451.39 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21GORMAN 001-162-999-5118 1,438.94 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12=10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21DEGANGE 001-161-999-5118 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/21 HILLBERG 165-199-999-5118 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 SERVEN 001-164-603-5118 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 SERVEN 190-180-999-5118 56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 SERVEN 193-180-999-5118 56095 06/10/99 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER OVRLD DR SEWER LINE RELOCATION 210-165-604-5804 56096 06/10/99 003705 EDA JOB TRAINING RVSD EDA KIOSK CONTENT AGREMNT 001-111-999-5270 2,858.40 1,233.60 375.84 375.84 742.72 1,8~6.39 900.00 8,580.25 1,846.39 900.00 56097 06/10/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE BALLFIELD PREPS (MAR/APR/MAY) 190-180-999-5415 56097 06/10/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LDSCP REPAIRS: CRC SOUTH SIDE 190-182-999-5415 56097 06/10/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP REPAIRS:MARGARITA SC 190-180-999-5415 56098 06/10/99 002037 EXPANETS (3) 2" SLEAVES FOR MAINT FAC 210-190-158-5804 56098 06/10/99 00Z037 EXPANETS CABLiNG 2ND FLOOR MAINT FAC 210-190-158-5804 56098 06/10/99 002037 EXPANETS TELEPHONE MAZNT & REPAIRS 320-199-999-5215 56099 06/10/99 000478 FAST SIGNS TCSD SIGNS FOR NEW SVC TRUCK 190-180-999-5214 3,225.00 1,080.00 35.93 507.80 1,446.00 44.00 43.23 4,340.93 1,997,80 43.23 56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230 56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230 44.75 73.50 16.25 12.75 30.25 177.50 56101 06/10/99 FINLEY, GABRIELLE REIMB:VOORBURG VISIT EXPENSES 001-101-999-5280 280.39 280.39 56102 06/10/99 000166 FIRST AHERICAN TITLE CO TITLE INSURANCE POLICY PW97-07 210-165-681-5804 360.00 360.00 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-7824 COHERCHERO:NETHERLDS 001-100-999-5258 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-9152 K.LINDEMANS:PALM SPG 001-100-999-5258 56103 06/10/p9 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER XXXX-9277 R.ROBERTS:SACRANENTO 001-100-999-5258 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-9277 R.ROBERTS: PROF MTG 001-100-999-5260 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES:JOBTRAK CORP 001-150-999-5254 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES:SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5223 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES: GIFTS VOORB 001-101-999-5280 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES:MMASC MTG 001-150-999-5260 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-1405 D.UBNOSKE: PROF MTGS 001-1990 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-0432 A.ELMO: PROF MTG 001-162-999-5260 56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-1143 H.PARKER: PROF MTG 190-1990 56104 06/10/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-2626 POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5229 56104 06/10/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-3539 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 85.63 381.59 508.44 21.37 180.00 84.98 52.41 462.90 88.53 11.90 58.50 293.21 36.91 1,936.25 330.12 56105 06/10/99 GOVE, JULIE REFUND: ART/CRAFTS-ARTISTIC 190-183-4980 6.00 6.00 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES:STATION 84 001-171-999-5212 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES - SPORT PRGM 190-183-999-5380 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPL[ES- PW MAINT 001-164-601-5218 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 197.87 243.18 54.82 185.07 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 lZ:10 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK ANOtJNT 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS NARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC, 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC, 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR VARIOUS TOOLS FOR HARDWARE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 - CRC 190-182-999-5212 - B & S 001-162-999-5215 MAINT CREWS 190-180-999-5242 MAINT CREWS 190-181-999-5242 MAINT CREWS 190-182-999-5242 MAINT CREWS 190-184-999-5242 MAINT CREWS 340-1990 MAINT CREWS 340-199-702-5242 MAINT CREWS 001-164-605-5242 MAINT CREWS 001-164-605-5242 - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 - SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 - TCC 190-184-999-5212 - PW INSPECT 001-163-999-5218 - PW INSPECT 001-164-601-5218 617.25 793.04 350.25 266.50 136.10 136.10 340.25 204.15 136.10 204.15 .01 683,29 23.09 105.25 205,21 71.22 4,952.90 56108 06/10/99 002572 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 455.20 455.20 56109 06/10/99 HEWITT, SARAH 56109 06/10/99 HEWITT, SARAH REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT ADDITIONAL ROOM USE CHARGE 190-2900 190-183-4990 100.00 62.75- 37.25 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 56110 06/10/99 002107 HIGHMARK, INC. HIGHMARK, INC. HIGHMARK, INC. HIGHMARK, INC. HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC, HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC, HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC. HIGHMARK INC, 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 198.15 195.95 7.68 1.70 5.40 4.68 204.95- 187.15 7.68 1.70 3.40 4.68 409.90 56111 06/10/99 001013 56111 06/10/99 001013 56111 06/10/99 001013 HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS SALES TAX AUDIT FOR 2ND QTR SALES TAX RECOVERY FEE PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVS. 001-140-999-5248 001-140-999-5248 001-140-999-5248 9O0.00 1,205.19 2,400.00 4,505,19 56112 06/10/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES 56112 06/10/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214 MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214 26.66 18.88 45.54 56113 06/10/99 000388 I C B O, INC. ESTAB BLDG PERMIT FEES WKBK 001-162-999-5228 25.86 25.86 56114 06/10/.99 000194 56114 06/10/99 000194 56114 06/10/99 000194 56114 06/10/99 000194 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,954.23 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 18.75 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 263.56 RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP 280-2080 32.82 2,269.36 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56115 06/10/99 001573 INLAND EMPIRE TOURISM C PARTICIPATION:REGIONAL VISITOR 001-111-999-5270 3,000.00 3,000.00 56116 06/10/99 003670 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR CO FIRE STATION GARAGE DOOR REPAR 001-171-999-5212 640.00 640.00 56117 06/10/99 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 275.27 275.27 56118 06/10/99 001894 JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY DESILTING POND-CATCH BASIN:CRC 190-180-999-5416 380.00 380.00 56119 06/10/99 000210 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES - PUBLICATION: CAL MUNI LAW HDBK 001-120-999-5228 150.00 150.00 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 BROMNET 001-110-999-5118 185.76 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 LUQUE 340-199-701-5118 211.40 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/23 LUQUE 340-199-701-5118 211.40 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 COOK 001-165-999-5118 139.32 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 COOK 001-164-604-5118 139.32 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/23 BELIAN 001-171-999-5118 557.28 56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/23 BELIAN 001-162-999-5118 371.52 1,816.00 56121 06/10/99 003644 MASTER BUILDING SPECIAL INSTALL RESTROOM EQUIP:SPRTSPK 190-180-999-5212 724.00 724.00 56122 06/10/99 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. PRINT SVCS:QTRLY TRAFF.NEWSLTR 001-110-999-5222 3,411.36 3,411.36 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALHL 001-2340 3,101.25 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 103.83 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE iNSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 190-2340 287.76 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 193-2340 21.44 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-2340 62.29 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 300-2340 20.76 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 340-2340 83.06 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP WRONG PREMIUM PULLED 001-2340 53.05- 56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP COBRA/GREEK/DENTAL/JUNE 001-1180 83.06 3,710.40 56124 06/10/99 003241 56124 06/10/99 003241 56124 06/10/99 003241 56124 06/10/99 003241 56124 06/10/99 003241 56124 06/10/99 003241 MILLAR HEATING & AIR, MILLAR HEATING & AIR, MILLAR HEATING & AiR, MILLAR HEATING & AIR~ MILLAR HEATING & AIR, MILLAR HEATING & AIR, MAY HVAC MAINT.SVCS:CRC MAY HVAC MAINT,SVCS:TCC MAY HVAC MA[NT.SVCS:CITY HALL MAY HVAC MA[NT.SVCS:MAINT,FAC, MAY HVAC MAINT.SVCS:SEN[OR CTR REPAIR HVAC:CITY HALL 190-182-999-5250 500.00 190-184-999-5250 150.00 340-199-701-5250 1,300.00 340-199-702-5250 100.00 190-181-999-5250 150.00 340-199-701-5250 90.00 2,290.00 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS STATIONARY & PRINTING SERVS 001-161-999-5222 91.44 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222 7.09 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS STATIONARY & PRINTING SERVS 001-162-999-5222 139.32 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY LOGO ENVELOPES- TWO CASES 190-182-999-5220 176.82 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-182-999-5220 13.70 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS. CARDS:G.THORNHILL 001-161-999-5222 102.50 56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222 7.94 538.81 56126 06/10/99 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI DRINKING FOUNT. SUPPLIES:PARKS 190-180-999-5212 114.00 114.00 56127 06/10/99 NATtL BUS t,~3MENtS LDRSH CONF:AUG 5-6:L NORTON 001-140-999-5261 199.00 199.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VCXJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUHBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56128 06/10/99 000930 NATIONAL EMBLEM, INC. UNIFORM PATCHES FOR TEN POLICE 001-170-999-5243 1,164.67 56128 06/10/99 000930 NATIONAL EMBLEM, INC. SALES TAX 001-170-999-5243 91.92 1,256.59 56129 06/10/99 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION NETVIZ 4 PROFESSIONAL EDITION 320'199'999'5211 589.00 56129 06/10/99 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION NETVIZ 4 PRO ANN SOFTWARE MAIN 320-199-999-5211 175.00 56129 06/10/99 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION FREIGHT 320-199-999-5211 15.00 779. O0 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT CIP PROJECT UPDATE ADS:PW 001-165-999-5256 172.22 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT PLANNING COMM. VACANCY ADS 001-120-999-5254 184.57 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NARG. COMN. PARK DEOICAT. AO 190-1990 319.91 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT CIP PROJECT UPOATE ADS:PW 001-165-999-5256 344.47 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT SKATE COMPETITION ADS:SKATE PK 190-180-999-5254 114.41 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT ADVERTISEMENT FOR ROA COMM. 001-120-999-5254 61.52 56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT EGG HUNT ADVERTISEMENT:TCSD 190-180-999-5254 123.05 1,320.15 56131 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 1YR NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 001-140-999-5228 8~.00 84.00 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 160.01 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 127.68 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT 190-180-999-5214 19.19 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT 001-164-601-5214 47.50 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 108.24 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 20.15 56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 28.22 510.99 56133 06/10/99 003177 P B LOADER CORPORATION PARTS FOR PW PATCH TRUCK 001-164-601-5214 132.90 56133 06/10/99 003177 P B LOADER CORPORATION FREIGHT 001-164-601-5214 12.00 56133 06/10/99 003177 P B LOADER CORPORATION SALES TAX 001-164-601-5214 11.23 156.13 56134 06/10/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY CONSULTING SERVICES 165-199-999-5248 1,163.72 56134 06/10/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY CONSULTING SERVICES 280-199-999-5248 1,163.72 56134 06/10/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY CONSULTING SERVICES 001-111-999-5248 410.71 2,738.15 56135 06/10/99 003143 PAINTING BY KIETH WOOD RES IMPROVE PROG:RODUE,H & 0 165-199-813-5804 2,670.00 2,670.00 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 459.37 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 215.66 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 190-2090 251.60 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 194-2090 83.86 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 71.88 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 1,360.51 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 370.65 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 280-2090 3.57 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 758.22 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 40.84 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 6,292.28 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 823.67 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 191-2090 16.49 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 192-2090 54.25 56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 431.74 56136 06/10/~9 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 263.02 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 561~6 561~6 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56136 56137 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 56138 12:10 CHECK DATE 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06110199 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 VENDOR NUMBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 001958 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 VENDOR NAME PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CiTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 KAISER 000245 KAISER 000245 PAClFICR 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PAClFICR 000245 PC 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS DED 000245 PERS-ADN 000245 AETNA SO 000245 AETNA SO 000245 AETNA SO 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 CZGNA 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 KAISER 000245 PAC]FICR 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PACIFZCR 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS REV 001958 PERS L-T PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSERENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIRBURSENENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSERENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSERENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 280 - 2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001 - 2090 001-2090 O01 - 2090 165 - 2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193 - 2090 O01 - 2090 001-2090 001-2122 001-161-999-5262 001-161-999-5261 001-161-999-5261 001-161-610-5261 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5320 001-150-999-5260 190-183-999-5320 001-162-999-5261 190-180-999-5261 190-180-999-5212 001-162-999-5220 001-164-601-5260 001-120-999-5220 001-100-999-5260 190-180-999-5212 001-140-999-5260 001-2175 280-199-999-5260 165-199-999-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 3.83 164.41 870.29 2,233,26 164.8~ 5,188.75 802.90 19.72 562.00 2,535.16 1,317.35 136.92 43.82 111.43 37.14 18.92 83.52 2.14 57.86 27.42 8.A8 277.20 31.81 1.67 168,84 1,203.66- 19.75 15.00 11.43 2.00 4O.77 32.32 17.93 9.95 36.00 8.90 30.00 26.93 12.57 15.00 30.13 11.99 32.32 13.50 7.53 10.12 10,12 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 25,497.03 B.~ VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06110/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56138 06/10/p9 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5242 56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-602-5258 56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEHENT 001-171-999-5261 56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5250 4.84 25.00 18.88 15.00 23.32 481.30 56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 190-180-999-5230 56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAiL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-100-999-5230 43.25 78.50 45.25 11.75 178.75 56141 06/10199 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA POSTAGE FOR TRAFFIC NEWSLETTER 001-110-999-5230 56141 06/10/99 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA CREDIT FOR PRIOR POSTAGE PAID 190-180-999-5230 56141 06/10/99 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA CREDIT FOR PRIOR POSTAGE PAID 001-110-999-5230 2,704.00 1,676.48- 241.67- 785.85 56142 06/10/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COOPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PW 98-12 001-120-999-5256 56142 06/10/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COOPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:DO01 001-120-999-5256 56142 06/10/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COOPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PW98-18 001-120-999-5256 76.14 24.00 65.33 165.47 56143 06/10/99 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL:CRC 190-180-999-5238 1/,6.11 146.11 56144 06/10/99 002793 ~UICK WRAP BAG PACKAGING SUPPLIES:PLANNiNG 001-161-999-5230 43.62 43.62 56145 06/10/99 003308 R D 0 RENTAL COOPANY MAY EQU/P.RENTAL:PW MAINT.CW. 001-164-601-5238 195.57 195,57 56146 06/10/99 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 56146 06/10/99 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC. MlSC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 15.91 178.29 194.20 56147 06/10/99 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB BACKFLOU TESTING:VAR.PARKS 193-180-999-5212 125.00 125.00 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-OS-OO111-O=WINCH.RD.LSC 191-180-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-26305-O:OT FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-27924-2:NORENO RD 190-185-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-27999-1:MORENO RD DC 190-185-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-30205-O:6TH ST. LSCP 001-164-603-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-30206-O:6TH ST. LSCP 001-164-603-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-55015-O=OT FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:OI-O6-6OOOS-O:MAIN STREET 001-164-603-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5:PUJOL ST 280-199-807-5801 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O2-98000-O:PAUBA RD-DC 001-171-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-181-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-184-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240 29.48 125.72 46.42 9.62 65.69 33.23 36.91 9.62 40.58 9.62 7,377.63 108.21 835.75 233.72 243.85 3,170.40 405.74 12,782.19 56149 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 4TH JULY WATER HOOK-UP:PAUBA 190-1990 56150 06/10/~9 RANCHO CREEK APARTMENTS REIMBURSEMENT FOR FENCE REPAIR 001-164-601-5401 750.00 575.00 750.00 575.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56151 06/10/99 003591 RENES COHMERCIAL MANAGE WEED ABATEMENT:CITYWIDE 001-164-601-5402 56151 06/10/99 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE PEST CONTROL:R.VISTA/V.BRISAS 001-164-601-5402 1,075.00 2,520.00 3,595.00 56152 06/10/99 000266 RIGHTWAY JUN EQU[P.RENTAL:R[VERTON PARK 190-180-999-5238 62.89 62.89 56153 06/10/99 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR PARKING C[T ASSESS FOR MAR 99 001-2260 2,127.00 56153 06/10/99 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR PARKING CIT ASSESS FOR MAR 99 001-2265 605.00 2,732.00 56154 06/10/99 000955 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'B FUNDRAISER:ROTARY CLUB:S/08/99 001'170-999-5370 224.50 224.50 56155 06/10/99 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & APR ENG.SVCS:S.GERTRUDIS TRAIL 210-190-147-5802 4,000.00 56155 06/10/99 000271 ROBERT REIN, t~4 FROST & APR CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SVC 210-165-686-5804 3,385.00 7,385.00 56156 06/10/99 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES IMPRV PROG:RODUE/FENCE WRK 165-199-813-5804 1,898.00 1,898.00 56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 29.95 56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 52.42 56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:CRC POOL GATE 190-182-999-5212 142.00 56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LABOR. 190-182-999-5212 170.00 56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 11.01 56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:CRC FACILITY 190-182-999-5212 1,429.11 1,834.49 56158 06/10/99 003689 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE ADVERTISING:MRKT PRGN 001-111'999-5270 2,000.00 2,000.00 56159 06/10/99 003694 SARAKKI ASSOCIATES CONSULT SVCS:TRAFF.MONITOR.SYS 210-165-607-5801 2,000.00 2,000.00 56160 06/10/99 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA MAY POOL MAINT SVC:TES 190-180-999-5212 318.00 318.00 56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TEEN ACTIVITIES 190-183-999-5320 44.29 56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TINY TOTS 190-183-999-5320 70.36 56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS 001-150-999-5260 115,10 56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. MTG SUPPLIES: CITY MGR OFFICE 001-110-999-5260 19.61 249.36 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:Z-10-331-Z153:TCC 190-184-999-5240 607.90 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON JUN:2-19-249-3989:MARG. LS3 191-180-999-5319 27.10 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:Z-OO-397-5067:VARIOOS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 12.53 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOOS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 703.86 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-15-671-5518:PALA RD TC1 191-180-999-5319 136.70 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-348-6315:MARG.RD.TC1 191-180-999-5319 96.48 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-589-9739:MARG.RD.LS3 191-180-999-5319 52.60 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-528-9980:SANTIAGO RD 191-180-999-5319 179.88 56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:65-77-804-6630-O1:RNBO CYN 191-180-999-5240 108.08 1,925.13 56163 06/10/99 STAPLES INC COPIER FOR STOREFRONT OFFICE 001-170-999-5229 1,069.73 1,069.73 56164 06/10/99 003682 SULLIVAN SANDBLASTING REMOVE OLD ST.STRIPING:MARG/RC 001-164-602-5410 4,900.00 4,900.00 56165 06/10/99 003586 SUNBADGE COMPANY BADGES FOR TEMECULA POLICE 001-170-999-5243 302.50 56165 06/10/99 003586 SUNBADGE COMPANY FREIGHT 001-170-999-5243 5.00 56165 06/10/99 003586 SUNBADGE COMPANY SALES TAX 001-170-999-5243 21.93 329.43 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRZPTZON NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56166 06/10/99 T W ~ELDING 5 SOILS PROBE EQUIP FOR CIP 001-165-999-5242 150.00 150.00 56167 06/10/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 77.36 56167 06/10/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES:REC TEEN ROOM 190-2910 22.60 99.96 56168 06/10/99 003375 TAYLOR, BEA VOLUNTEER WORK:OLD TOWN/MAY 99 280-199-999-5250 50.00 50.00 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 472.95 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 82.00 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 1.03 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 2.05 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 14.35 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 3.07 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 19.05 56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 20.50 615.00 56170 06/10/99 003673 TECH 101/ARCUS, INC. HP LASERJET 320-199-999-5242 599.00 56170 06/10/99 003673 TECH 101/ARCUS, INC. SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 46.42 645.42 56171 06/10/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 47.00 56171 06/10/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES:MAINT.FAC. 340-199-702-5212 47.00 94.00 56172 06/10/99 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 94.71 94.71 56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 136.00 56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 340.00 56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 136.00 56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-180-999-5330 68.00 680.00 56174 06/10/99 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM MUSEUM GIFT SHOP MERCHANDISE 190-185-999-5250 10,000.00 10,000.00 56175 06/10/99 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIG.SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 370.78 370.78 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-999-5263 194.50 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-170-999-5262 14.12 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 190-180-999-5263 526.32 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-161-999-5263 23.15 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-163-999-5263 292.14 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-601-5263 562.14 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-604-5263 158.96 56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-165-999-5263 68.54 1,839.87 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 2,812.08 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 290.00 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 589,65 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 80,00 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 20.00 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 1.00 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 190.00 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 10.00 56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 350.00 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 12:10 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56177 06/10/99 000642 56178 06/10/99 003092 56178 06/10/99 003092 TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE TIMBERLAKE PAINTING TIMBERLAKE PAINTING EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX REPAIR/NAINT:SAM HICKS PARK REPAIR/MAINT:TEM.CHAPEL 340-1020 190-180-999-5212 190-185-999-5212 5.00 450.00 770.00 4,347.73 1,220.00 56179 06/10/99 003720 TOBIN, TONY PURCHASE MUSEUM ARTIFACTS 210-190-808-5804 56180 06/10/99 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TENNIS NET CTR.STRAPS:PALA PK 190-183-999-5320 56180 06/10/99 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-999-5320 56180 06/10/99 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5320 22,000.00 48.00 4.00 3.72 22,000.00 55.72 56181 06/10/9<2 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON REPAIR 6TH ST. BOARDWALK 56181 06/10/99 0033~ TOP, AN DEVELOPMENT & CON REPAIR:6TH ST. BOARDWALK 001-164-603-5212 001-164-603-5212 4,910.25 4,995.75 9,906.00 56182 06/10/99 003680 TRAILERS USA AUTO/EQUIPMENT TRAILER:TCSD 190-180-999-5610 56182 06/10/99 003680 TRAILERS USA DOC FEE 190-180-999-5610 56182 06/10/99 003680 TPdMLERS USA SALES TAX 190-180-999-5610 2,275.00 45.00 179.80 2,499.80 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 005560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 56185 06/10/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AO&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRANSAMER1CA 003560 AD&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AO&D 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AO&O 56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 132.76 3.01 23.90 .08 .23 2.44 1.34 1.49 .74 3.00 1.50 3.51 174.00 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 8#307.07 210.23 1,619.78 2.50 33.38 25.00 85.23 96.34 643.07 158.33 11,180.93 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RET[R 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 1,854.66 161.05 901.34 49.71 28.64 48.04 41.28 3,084.72 56186 06/10/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 228.59 VOUCNRE2 06/10/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56186 56186 56186 56186 56186 56186 56187 56187 56187 56187 56187 56187 56188 56189 56189 56189 56189 56189 56189 56189 56190 56191 56191 56191 56191 56191 12:10 CHECK DATE 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/~9 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 06/10/99 VENDOR NUMBER 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000524 000524 000524 000524 000524 000524 000339 002109 002109 002109 002109 002109 002109 002109 001601 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 VENDOR NAME UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED ~AY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA VAN TECH ENG[NEERING/SA VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 U~ SAFETY VESTS/JACKETS:PW SAFETY VESTS/JACKETS:PW SAFETY VESTS/JACKETS:PW SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS MISC. MAINT.SUPPLIES:LAND DEV. MISC. MAINT. SUPPL[ES:PW CREW MEAS.~HEEL EQUIP.:TRAFF.D[V, SALES TAX MARKING PAINT FOR POLICE LUMBER CRAYON FOR POLICE SALES TAX DEC-APR PROF,SVCS FOR E,I.R. APR BASE CHARGE:F2OOMAJ COPIER SUPPLIES:COPY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT FOR COPIER/TCC MAY LEASE:5100 COPIER MAY INTEREST ON LEASE:5100 ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 300-2120 320-2120 330-2120 001-163-999-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-164-602-5242 001-165-999-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-164-602-5242 001-120-999-5228 001-163-999-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-602-5242 001-164-602-5242 001-170-999-5242 001-170-999-5242 001-170-999-5242 001-164-602-5248 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5220 190-184-999-5239 330-2800 330-199-999-5391 ITEM AMOUNT 3.76 20.00 1.54 .25 3.86 5.00 55.26 72.58 27.21 4.01 5.26 1.97 176.44 53.14 130.46 227.30 17.62 49.32 41.40 7.03 665.00 110.00 783.35 67.08 1,769.09 350.94 PAGE 13 CHECK AMOUNT 263. O0 166.29 176.44 526.27 665.00 3,080.46 TOTAL CHECKS 378,213.35 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 12:36 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 340 FACILITIES AHOUNT 1,003,861.39 1,369.85 49,074.37 1,250.00 22,188.00 930,889.57 65.20 14,040.05 1,352.08 541.00 TOTAL 2,026,631.51 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 12:36 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AHOUNT CHECK ANOLINT 56194 56195 56195 56195 56195 56196 56196 56197 56197 56197 56198 56198 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 56199 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 003630 AGUILAR, GREG VILLANUEV MAY PROF ENG SVCS: CIP PRJTS 001'165-999'5248 003567 C C MYERS, INC. MAY PRGSS:OVRLD OVERCROSSING 210-165'604'5804 003567 C C MYERS, INC. RETENTION:MAY PRGSS:OVRLD/[-15 210'2035 003567 C C MYERS, INC. CREDIT:OVRCHRGED ITEM# 18 & 67 210-165-604-5804 003567 C C MYERS, INC. CREDIT:RETENTION REVERSE:MAY 210-2035 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAR/APR SVCS:OVRLD INSPECTION 210-165-604'5801 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAY INSPECTION SVCS:OVRLD DR. 210-165-604-5801 001009 D B X, INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MOOS.:R.C./MARG 001-164-602'5412 001009 D B X# INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MOOS:WINCH/JEFF 001'164-602-5412 001009 D B X, INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL:R.C./VIA LAS CO 210-165-671-5804 001924 DMG MAXIMUS MAR/APR SVCS:USER FEE STUDY 001'140-999-5248 001924 DMG MAXIMUS USER FEE STUDY TRAVEL EXPENSES 001-140-999-5248 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: NORTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: PARKS 190-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: STREETSCAPE 190-199-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: WINCHESTER CRK 190-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: SOUTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: MARG RD MEDIAN 191-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: SPORTS PRK 190-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: MARG COMM PRK 190-180-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER 190-181-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: CRC 190-182-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS: TCC 190-184-999-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN PRK LOT 001-164-603-5415 06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: STATION #84 001-171-999-5212 56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGESS:PALA RD BRIDGE PRJT 210-165-631-5804 56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION ITEM 72:NOT COMPLETED AS BILLE 210-165-631-5804 56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION:MAY PRGSS:PALA BRDGE 210-2035 56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION REVERSED CM 03-PALA 210-2035 8,000.00 256,022.80 25,602.28- 3,050.00' 305.00 7,740.00 11,072.50 5,070.00 8,505.00 7,264.53 10,530.00 1,514.50 8,813.00 7,806.00 106.00 1,568.00 13,375.00 1,150.00 100.00 18,578.00 1,049.00 361.00 1,444.00 193.00 541.00 250.00 400.00 360,574.45 2,842.65- 36,057.44' 284.27 8,000.00 227,675.52 18,812.50 20,839.53 12,044.50 55,734.00 321,958.63 56201 06/22/99 003676 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION-ES RELEASE RETENTION TO ESCROW 210-1035 35,773.17 35,773.17 56202 06/22/99 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH PRINTING RECREATION BROCHURES 190-180-999-5222 17,166.46 17,166.46 56203 06/22/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN MAY BUILDING INSPECTION SVCS 001-162-999-5118 56204 06/22/99 003631 KLEINFELDER, INC. 4/1-16 SVCS:GEOTECHNICAL OVRLD 210-165-604-5801 56204 06/22/99 003631 KLEINFELDER, INC. 4/1-16 SVCS:GEOTECHNICAL PALA 210-165-631-5801 56205 06/22/99 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI MAY SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 56206 06/22/99 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 56206 06/22/99 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 8,816.00 9,334.00 6,474.00 9,090.72 9,296.Z0 2,576.00 8,816.00 15,808.00 9,090.72 VOUCHRE2 06/10/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56206 56207 56207 56208 56208 56209 56209 56209 56210 56210 12:36 CHECK DATE 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/Z2/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 VENDOR NUMBER 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 000267 000267 003599 003599 003149 003149 003149 000420 000420 VENDOR NAME RICHARDS, MATSON & GERS RICHARDSw WATSON & GERS RICHARDSo WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RXCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RXCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT T Y INTERNATIONAL T Y INTERNATIONAL TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION, TERP, A-CAL CONSTRUCTION, TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION, TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES FY 98-99 2ND QTR FIRE SERVICES FY 98-99 4TH QTR EST.FIRE SVCS PROFESS SERV:OVERLAND DRIVE OC PALA RD BRIDGE:AMENDMENT 3 APR PRGS PMT#6:DUCK POND:97-17 C/O PRGS PMT#6:DUCK POND:97-17 RET.W/H PMT#6:DUCK POND:97-17 OVERLAND DR/MARG RD:ST WIDENIN OVERLAND DR/MARG RD:ST WIDENIN ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130'999'5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 261-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 210-165-604-5801 210-165-604-5801 210-165-604-5801 210-165-631-5801 300-199-999-5246 280-1990 165-199-999-5246 280-1990 165-199-999-5246 001-2030 001-171-999-5251 210-165-604-5804 210-165-631-5801 210-190-143-5804 210-190-143-5804 210-2035 210-165-681-5802 210-165-681-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 6,566.29 802.91 182.40 810.00 1,202.60 36.00 215.50 39.00 433.80 65.20 18.00 1,399.58 1,293.30 347.58 610.6~ 900.28 9,T32.80 1,302.00 4,307.25 67.85 465,380.59 465,380.59 5,183.85 12,410,00 277,489.55 19,002.72 29,649.23- 14,617.50 891.73 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 42,205.18 930,761.18 17,593.85 266,843.04 15,509.23 TOTAL CHECKS 2,024,631.51 ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council James B. O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~"~.~ June 22, 1999 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Santa Ana Watershed resolution. That the City Council: (1) review the program being implemented by the Project Authority (SAWPA) and (2) consider adopting the following RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOND INITIATIVE BACKGROUND: The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and its member agencies including Eastern Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utility Agency, Orange County Water District, San Bemardino Valley Municipal Water District and Western Municipal Water District have been leaders in planning and dealing with the complex problems involved in watershed management. Their efforts have led to significant projects involving water conservation and clean up of contamination. SAWPA is proposing a regional program to assure a sustainable water supply for the future, while at the same time enhancing the environment. The goal of the program is to make the region entirely self sufficient during drought cycles, thereby firming up the regions ability to assure a stable economy, while improving water quality, and also allowing more of the State's scarce water resources to be allocated to wildlife and agriculture during those times. The SAWPA Plan components include: Groundwater Storage, Contamination Removal, Habitat Enhancement, Wetlands/Open Space, and Conservation/Flood Control/Water Efficiency. The budget plan is estimated at $20 billion over the next twenty years. Funding requests are being requested from Local, State and Federal funds and SAWPA is currently requesting $430 million for the program to be included in the proposed March 2000 State Water Bond. Eastem Municipal Water District (EMWD), Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Lee Lake Water District, City of Norco, City of Corona, The Valley Group and County of Riverside have all demonstrated strong support that a viable water bond be placed on the March 2000 ballot. Westem Riverside Council of Govemments (WRCOG) and the Rancho California Water District have both expressed they have no position on the proposed project. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA SUPPORTING INITIATIVE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, a safe, clean and reliable water supply is critical to California's economic and environmental future; and WHEREAS, California's dependence on imported water supplies threatens both the economy and the environment, especially during times of drought; California should pursue new and innovative methods to become more water self sufficient by increasing water storage and utilizing that water during times of drought; and WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ("SAWPA") has developed programs for underground water storage and environmental restoration in the Southern California region that is home to nearly twenty-five (25%) percent of the State's population. These programs will increase the water supply so the region will be completely self sufficient during droughts, improve the quality and safety of the water supply, restore habitat for native species, provide flood control, and create new wetlands and open space in the region. WHEREAS, the California Legislature and the Governor should assure safe, clean and reliable water is a pdority for California by placing a water bond measure on the March 2000 ballot that provides significant funding for the SAWPA programs. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Resos\99-40 I ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager June 22, 1999 Amendment to Contract with David Turch and Associates Aliie Kuhns, Senior Management Analys~j__. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an amendment to the contract with David Turch and Associates which extends the contract period to June 30, 2000 for the annual contract amount of $28,000. BACKGROUND: During the June 23, 1998 meeting, the City Council approved an amendment to the contract with David Turch and Associates to pursue federal funding opportunities for infrastructure needs. This amendment was awarded in the annual amount of $28,000, plus expenses. (Note: David Turch and Associates has not billed for any additional expenses to date during their two-year contract period.) Since the contract award in May, 1997, David Turch and Associates has proven to be a great asset in obtaining over $8 Million in Federal Funding. Specific projects that have moved forward due to their efforts include the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange, Pala Road Bridge, and Overland Overcrossing projects. FISCAL IMPACT: this amendment. Funding has been budgeted in the 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget to fund SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and David Turch and Associates ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A, On May 27, 1997 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement"). On June 23, 1998, the First Amendment to this Agreement was approved to extend the Agreement to terminate on June 30, 1999, and to increase the annual amount to $28,000. C. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1997 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 4 of the Agreement will remain unchanged to read as follows: "4. PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant Twenty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($28,000) per year. Such compensation is to be paid according to the following schedule: The first month's payment of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000) to accompany this contract amendment. Thereafter, each month' s payment of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) is agreed to be due and payable, without additional notice or demand, on or before the first day of each calendar month, beginning on August 1, 1998. The final month payment due on June 1, 1999, shall be in the amount of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000). Expenses: City agrees to reimburse Consultant for all ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred on its behalf. Consultant agrees to bill Temecula monthly for such expenses, such billing to be mailed on or before the fifth day of each calendar month. Such expense statements are agreed to he paid by Temecula on or before the fifteenth day of the calendar month following such billing." Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT BY: NAME: TITLE: ITEM 6 APPROVA~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINA CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manage~City Council t.~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 City Council Chamber- Facility Use Policy PREPARED BY: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Facility Use Policy for the use of the City Council Chambers. DISCUSSION: Occasionally, requests are made to reserve the Council Chambers by various community groups and organizations within the City. Therefore, staff has developed the attached formal policy to identify the procedures, costs, and responsibilities associated with the use of the City Council Chambers. The Council Chamber's primary purpose is to provide a formal location for meetings held by the City Council. When the Chamber is not in use by the Council, the Chamber may be used by City Commissions, Advisory Committees, City staff conducting City business, other governmental agencies, as well as limited usage by local non-profit service clubs that benefit City of Temecula residents. All facility use approvals will be granted based upon the five (5) priority groupings established within this policy. The procedure to reserve the use of the City Council Chamber is consistent with the procedure to reserve any existing City facility. The Community Services Department will manage reservation requests to ensure there are no scheduling conflicts, as well as to provide support as needed. Reservations must be made Monday through Fdday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Groups or organizations requesting the use of the facility must complete a facility use form and service order request form to ensure that staff is aware of the intended use and set-up the facility appropriately. Other than governmental uses, all other user groups and organizations would be required to pay facility rental fees, associated staff costs and provide the City with $1,000,000 General Liability Insurance naming the City of Temecula as additional insured. The fee for renting the City Council Chambers would be consistent with the fees outlined in Resolution No. 93-97 for use of a large multi-purpose room. R:~lGLERG~,GENDAS~ChamberReservations.1 .doc Currently the rate for non-profit uses is $25 for the first 3 hours, $7 for each hour thereafter. Groups for-profit will not be allowed. The Community Services Department would also require a cleaning security deposit in the amount of $100. Should additional equipment be requested, appropriate staffing and staff costs would also have to be paid by the renter(s). Many reservations will be accepted on a first-come, first served basis. Groups or organizations with a lower priority may be "bumped" from the calendar if groups with a higher priority request the use of the Council Chamber and sufficient accommodations can not be found elsewhere. In such cases, displaced groups/organizations may request the use of other City facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: To date, formal requests for use of the Council Chambers have been minimal. Although we are uncertain at this time to the amount of fees that will be generated, all fees collected will be deposited into the Indoor Rentals account # 190-183-4990. ATTACHMENTS: Policy and Resolution No. 93-97. R:%ZIGLERG~AGENDAS%ChamberReservations.1 .doc CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER FACILITY USE POLICY Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to identify the procedures, costs, and responsibilities associated with the use of the City's Council Chambers. Policy: Use of City Council Chamber: The purpose of the Council Chamber is to provide a formal location for meetings held by the City Council. Use of the City Council Chambers is limited to official activities of the City of Temecula, events sponsored or co- sponsored by the City, events that are official activities of another governmental agency and local non-profit service clubs. Capacity of Council Chamber: Capacity of the Chamber (lecture style) is 140. Priority of Groups Using Council Chamber: Priority of groups/organizations desiring to utilize the City Council Chambers will be based upon the following: Priority GrouD - 1: Reserved for City Council meetings. Priority Group - 2: Reserved for meetings of City Commissions and Advisory Committees. Priority Group - 3: Includes all City Departments that request the Council Chamber on an as-needed basis for meetings, training sessions, testing, etc. Also, included in this category are events that are sponsored or hosted by the City. Priority Group - 4: Includes all Federal, State, County, and City governmental and related agencies (i.e. school districts) using the Council Chamber to provide programs that benefit the City or the community. Priority Group - 5: Includes local (Temecula based) non-profit service clubs (i.e. Woman's Club, Kiwanis, Rotary Club, Lions Club and League of Women's Voters) conducting events that benefit City of Temecula residents. R:~PARKERHD\Council Chambers.doc Fee to Use Council Chamber: There will be no fee for to utilize the Council Chamber for Priority Groups 1-4. In the event that a Priority Group 5 is granted approval by the City Manager or his designee to utilize the Council Chamber, all fees identified for a large multi-purpose facility as identified in the current fee schedule, and appropriate staffing fees apply. In such cases, all fees must be paid to the City of Temecula in the Community Services Department at the time the reservation is made. Room Fee: Charges for the use of the City Council Chamber are listed in the City's Fee Resolution No. 93-97. Please see fee schedule for current charges. Cleaning Security Deposit: A cleaning security deposit in the amount of $100.00 may be charged for Priority Group 5 organizations. This deposit will be returned to the group/organization within two weeks of the scheduled program should the Council Chamber be left in the condition in which it was received. Insurance Requirements: All Priority Group 5 organizations desiring to use the Council Chamber must have $1,000,000 general liability coverage per occurrence which names the City of Temecula as additionally insured. Groups/organizations which do not have insurance may purchase special events insurance through the Finance Department if necessBry. In addition, all groups/organizations must identify and hold the City of Temecula harmless from any and all losses and claims. The Community Services Department must receive all insurance requirements and necessary forms no later than 72 hours prior to the scheduled program. Staff Support: Any Council Chamber user group/organization (including co-sponsors) requesting staff support will be charged as appropriate. This includes but, is not limited to set-up and takes down of tables and chairs and other special requirements (i.e. extra janitorial services, extra staff assistance, audio/visual staff, etc.) Overtime Personnel: All groups requesting use of the Council Chamber when a staff member is unavailable to be in attendance for the duration of the event must pay for overtime personnel. R:\PARKERHD\COunCil Charnbers.doc Reservation Procedure Use of the Council Chamber for appropriate functions will be scheduled on a priority basis (as defined in this policy). Many reservations will be accepted on a first-come, first served basis. Groups/organizations with lower priority may be "bumped" from the calendar if groups with higher priority request the use of the Council Chamber and sufficient accommodations can not be found elsewhere. In such cases, displaced groups/organizations may request the use of other City facilities. If no accommodations can be made, the City will assume no liability for displacing such groups/organizations and will refund any fees paid. All reservations for use of the Council Chamber must be made through the Community Services Department Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The Community Services Department in accordance with this policy will resolve any reservation and priority conflicts. · Advanced Reservations: Reservations may be made up to six months in advance. · Room Set-Up: Tables and chairs will be set-up in advance by City personnel. A Service Order Request from the Maintenance Division must be submitted to the Community Services Department at the time of reservation. Visual aid equipment may be provided as needed with payment of appropriate fees. All requests for audio/visual equipment must be made at the time of reservation. · Cancellations: The Community Services Department must be notified as soon as possible of any cancellations. A minimum of seventy-two hour prior notice is required. This will enable staff support to be re- assigned and the Council Chamber is made available for use. Failure to notify the Community Services Department of cancellations at least seventy-two hours in advance will result in the forfeiture of the room use fee (if appropriate), or in a charge- back to the canceling department for staff support time. Use Conditions and Limitations: Groups desiring to utilize the following regulations: Council Chamber must comply with the No Smoking: Smoking is not allowed in the Council Chamber. Food and Beverages: Food and beverages are allowed in the Council Chamber. However, care should be taken to ensure no damage is done to the facilities. Alcohol shall not be served in the Council Chamber. Exceptions to this policy may be approved in writing by the City Manager, provided the event takes place outside of normal business hours. R:\PARKERHD\Council Chambers.doc · Clean-Up/Security Deposit: Groups/organizations using the Council Chamber are responsible for returning the room to its original condition. Tables, chairs, etc. should be returned to their original positions. Food, beverages, papers, etc. should be removed or deposited in wastebaskets. Electrical equipment is to be turned off. Groups/organizations that damage or fail to clean the Council Chamber shall forfeit the required cleaning security deposit. If no cleaning security deposit was charged, groups/organizations will be billed for any damages or extra cleaning costs resulting from their use. · Entry Fees: Entry fees may not be charged by any group/organization using the Council Chamber. "Right of Refusal" The City of Temecula reserves the right and is under no obligation to allow any group/organization that falls outside the definitions herein to use the Council Chamber. Other Restrictions · No activities are permitted that violate local, state, or federal laws. Use must comply with all city codes and policies. · Use must not disrupt normal operations and functions of the City. · Commercial activities are not permitted. · No pets are permitted in the chambers except for seeing-eye or other animals required due to physical limitations of attendees. · Official functions of the City of Temecula shall take priority in scheduling the facility. · All scheduling requests shall be directed to the Community Services Department. R:\PARKERHD\Council Chambers.doc RESOLUTION NO. 93-97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF CITY PARKS WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to provide public access to indoor and outdoor city recreation facilities and to Special Use Park sites and recreation facilities; and WHEREAS, to help defray costs associated with providing the required staffing, utility costs, maintenance, and other services at such facilities, it is necessary to establish fees to reimburse the City for its operational expenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of ~he City of Temecula may establish by Resolution a Fee Schedule for the use of City parks; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows: Section 1: The revised fee schedule for Indoor Facility Use, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted. Section 2: The fee schedule for Outdoor Facility Use, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is hereby adopted. Section 3: The fee schedule for Special Use Park sites, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" is hereby adopted. Section 4: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption' of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of November, 1993. J. ATTEST: [SEAL] 5~sos~93-97 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECLILA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of Temecula DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Resolution No. 93-97 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of November, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone Mufioz NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 COIfNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall S.'G i k 5h'e. sos\93-97 City of Temecula Community Services Department I. Indoor Use Indoor Reserved Use: 1. All reserved use of' public recreational facilities requires review and approval of a "Facility Request Form" by City staff. Facility Request Forms may be obtained at Temecula City Hall, located at 43174 Business Park Drive. Requests must be submitted at least seven (7) working days prior to the intended use and all appropriate fees must be paid at the time of the request. ' 2. Facility Use Permits shall be issued only to responsible adults, age 21 years or older, who must comply with all rules and regulations. Such person is responsible for payment of all applicable charges and must be present at the function for which use is authorized. 3. A refundable cleaning deposit of $100 may be required with the completed request and applicable fees, depending upon the use of indoor facilities. Upon receipt, the facility win be reserved for the applicant pending it's availability and review by City slaff. The deposit will be returned if the facility is found to be in a condition similar to it being found immediately before the activity. The applicant may expect the returned deposit, or an appropriate portion thereof, within twenty (20) working days after the scheduled event. Should repairs to the facility be necessary that exceed the funds deposited, the City will hold the applicant financially responsible for such repairs. 4. No facility shall be scheduled more than six (6) months in advance. 5. Facilities are provided "as is" with limited support items. A preview of the facility will be encouraged before a request is submitted to ensure facilities meet applicant's needs. 6. A $5.00 processing fee will be levied by the City if an applicant cancels reservations within five (5') days of the event. 7. Until the required Facility Request Form, cleaning deposit, rental fees, required insurance, and other requirements are received by the City, the City shall have the right to cancel the applicants request. All required insurance verifications must be submitted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the use of the facility. R:~d~os~195 a 8. The City retains the right to deny any building utilization request that is inconsistent with the goals and policies of the City Council of the City of Temecula, Community Services Department. 9. The applicant is responsible for all set-up and clean-up. Necessary clean- up not performed by user will be conducted by the City and applicable costs will be assessed to the user's cleaning deposit. 10. All use is restricted to the day of rental. A facility will not be available. _. for set-up the day before, or clean-up 'the day after use without additional fees. 11. User must comply with instructions of City employee(s) on duty or risk immediate eviction from public premises. All noise, music amplification, etc. must be kept at a reasonable sound level as determined by security or the staff person on duty. The City staff member may cancel a function at any time if persons involved in the function are not conducting themselves in a lawful manner and/or are causing damage to City property. The authorized applicant is responsible for the supervision and actions of those in attendance. 12. The City is not responsible for any lost or stolen articles. 13. No City equipment or furnishings shall be removed from the premises. 14. Decorations must be approved prior to instaJ]ation and must be removed immediately after event. All decorations must be of a flameproof material. No nails, tacks, tape or other materials considered harmful or defacing to building is permitted. 15. The City may require security personnel at applicant's expense on 'functions deemed necessary or in the best interest of the City. 16. All admission fees charged by the applicant require City approval. Additional permits or licenses may be required. P~:~sos~9~ 4 CRy of Temecula Community Services Department - Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP I TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and recreational activities. FACILITY: K1T~ SMALL MEETING ROOM ' LARGE MEETING ROOM SMALL- MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM GYMNASIUM AMPHITHEATER SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R:~e~e~t~.9S 5 City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP II Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting commum'ty oriented leisure or sports activities. FACmrrY: K1TCI-m-N $ 5.00/3 Hour Min. $ 3.0 0 e a. - add'l. hour SMALL MEETING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM $ !0.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ea. add'l. hour $15.00/3 HourMin. $6.00 ca. add'l. hour SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MUlTI-PURPOSE ROOM $ 20.00/3 Hour Min. $ 25.00/3 Hour Min. $6.00 ea. add'l. hour $7.00 ca. add'l. hour GIqVINASILrlVi $ 20.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ca. add'l. hour AMPi-U'rHEATER: No Entry Fee Entry Fee $ 20.0013 Hour Min. $ 75.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ca. add'l. hour $20.00 ~ add'L hour SMATL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) $15.00/4 Hour Min. $ 25.00/4 Hour MAn. $5.00 ea. add'l. hour $6.00 ca. add'l. hour FACILITY: KITCHEN' City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP fly Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis. SMALL MI::~F-TING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM Minimum 3 Hour Use $10.00/3 Hour MAn. $ 25.00/3 Hour Min. $ 30.00/3 Hour Min. SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MIJLTI-PURPOSE ROOM $ 75.00/3 Hour Min. $ 90.00~3 Hour Min. GYMNAS~ $100.00/3 Hour Min. AMPHI'fI-I~ATER: No Entry Fee $100.00/3 Hour Min. SM~ r ,T , PICNIC (49 PARTXCIPANTS OR LESS) $ 30.00/4 Hour MAn. $7.00 ea. add'l. hour $8.00 ea. add'l. hour $10.00 ea. add'l. hour $15.00 ea. add'l. hour $20.00 ea. add'l. hour $20.00 ea. add'l. hour hour LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) $ 50.00/4 Hour Min. $12.00 ca. ndd'L hour City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP IV Profit making, commercial businesses or non-resident individuals and organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public. FACILITY: KITCHEN SMALL MF-F. TING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM GYMNASIUM A_MPHifH. EATER: No Entry Fe~ Entry -$ 40.00/3 Hour Min. $ 50.0013 Hour Min, $ 60,00/3 Hour Min. $150.00/3 Hour Min. $180.00/3 Hour Min. $200.00/3 Hour Min. $200,00/3 Hour Min, $375,00/3 Hour Min, $10.00 ea. add'l. hour $16.00 ea. add'l. hour $20.00 ea. add'l. hour $30.00 ea. add'l. hour $40.00 ea, add'l, hour $40.00 ea. add'l. hour $4O.0O ea, addl hour' $45.00 ea. add'L hour SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) LARGE PICNIC (S0-100 PARTt.CrPANTS) $ 60.0O/4 Hour MAn. $10O.0O/4 Hour Min. $20.00 ea. add'L hour $24.00 ea. add'L R~31~ 8 EXHIBIT "B" City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule OUTDOOR FACH/rY USE Fee Payment: The fees applicable to the use of facilities are contained herein and are due and payable at the TCSD office (72). hours prior to the use of that facility. 11. Outdoor Use GROUP Softball/Baseball Field* No Field Preparation No Lights Lighted 0 0 0 12.00 0 5.00 12.00 20.00 e Soccer/Football Field* No Field Preparation No Lights Lighted 0 0 0 12.00 0 5.00 12.00 20.00 .3. Toumamemts/Sports Clinics (per field per day) No Field Preparation 0 0. 75.00 150.00 4. A $5.00 Administrative fee will be charged for processing refunds! Individuals who do not reside within the boundaries of the City of Temecula registering for a TCSD sponsored activity or facility will be subject to a $10.00 per person non-residency fee. Fees listed herein are on an hourly basis per group, per field unless otherwise - R:~-~o~?.95 9 Payment for Special Use Parks A. All fees and deposits must be submitted to the City of Temecula prior to the user group's event. Should the user group fail to submit all required payments and insurance, the City reserves the right to cancel the reservation or event. B. Contracts of $2,500.00 or more require a 30% non-refundable deposit due ten (10) working days from the date the contract is issued. The fun balance is due and must be paid thirty (30) days prior to the event. Contracts of less than $2,500.00 require a 50% non-refundable deposit due ten (10) working days from the date the contract is issued. The full balance is due and must be paid thirty (30) calendar days prior to the event. C. The terms "set-up' or "tear don" shall include the use of the facility for moving in and out equipment, and preparation of the facility for performance of an event or activity. The charge for these periods is 15 % of the daily rental cost of the facility per day. This fee may be adjusted for Group Two user Groups. D. The charge for use of the facility shall apply to the periods of occupancy of the facility between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. No event shall be permitted to continue after 12:00 midnight unless agreed in writing and approved by the Director of Community Services. E. All rental requests require a security deposit of 25 % of the one day facility rental fee to ensure the facility and equipment arc left in good condition. Security deposits axe a guarantee against loss, damage or maintenance required to restore the facility to the condition it was prior to the event. The user group is responsible for all clean-up, and failure to comply will result in the forfeiture of the deposit. F. A $25.00 fee will be charged on any check returned to the City for any reason. The in~vidual or organization shall then be required to pay all rental fees and deposits by cash, cashiers check or money order. G. All costs deemed necessary and incurred by the City on behalf of a user group will be billed. it:~,wsos%29~ 10 City of Tem'ecuh Community Services Department Fee Schedule Special Use Park Sites Group I TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and recreational activities 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight No Charge Group II Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting community oriented leisure or sports activities. 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight $375.00 per day and any fees negotiated by con .tnct. Group Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis. 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight $525.00 p~ day and any fees negotiated by contract Group IV Profit runErig, commercial business or non-resident individuals and organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public. 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight $900.00 per day and any fees negotiated by contract: P,:~.sos~,95 11 ITEM 7 APPRO\~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 Resolution Adopting FY 1999/2000 Solid Waste Rates PREPARED BY: Todd Holmes, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 199912000 DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the existing solid waste franchise agreement with C R & R Incorporated the rates charged for refuse and recycling services in the City of Temecula are subject to annual review and modification. The franchise agreement provides for adjustments based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Riverside County landfill tipping fees. The CPI increase as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics is 1.4%. The County of Riverside Waste Resources Management District has determined that there will be no tipping fee increase in FY 1999/2000 at county landfills. The solid waste rates for fiscal year 1999/2000 reflect the 1.4% CPI increase and no change in the tipping fee. The single family residential rate for the current year, 1998/99 is $170.64; the new rate for 1999/2000 will be $172.56. This represents an annual increase of $1.92 per single family residence. The TCSD Board of Directors reviewed the single family residential refuse and recycling collection rate on May 25, 1999 as a part of the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for FY 1999/2000. The current rates and charges for solid waste services have been disclosed to the property owners and residents of the proposed annexation areas of Redhawk and Vail Ranch. If the annexation is approved by the voters, the annexation would become effective July 1, 2000. The rate and charge for solid waste services for FY 2000/01 will be determined in the same manner as this year's increase and the annexation area would be subject to the same rates and charges as the rest of the City. The attached Exhibit "D" reflects the new rates for solid waste collection for all collection services to become effective July 1, 1999. FISCAL IMPACT: The fee adjustments represent appropriate collection rates based on provisions in the solid waste franchise agreement. The franchised waste hauler will begin collecting the new fees as of July 1, 1999. No additional costs will be borne by the City of Temecula since these services are paid for directly by the customers receiving the services. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "D" U.S. Department of Labor, Consumer Price Index r:\c~gendas\98swratea.~ RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TI~IECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does fred, determine and a. The City of Temecula (the "City") and CR & R Incorporated ( the "Grantee") entered into an exclusive franchise agreement on May 28, 1991 for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing temporary bin/rolloff services in the City. b. The franchise agreement provides for periodic rate adjustments based on certain predefined criteria, specifically annual Consumer Price Index Ccpr') adjustments and landf'tll tipping fee adjustments. c. The franchise agreement further provides a formula to calculate the fee adjustments to be made to the agreement on an annual basis. d. The CPI adjustment is 1.4% for fiscal year 1999/2000. e. There is no tipping fee adjustment for fiscal year 1999/2000. f. The franchise agreement provides that the solid waste fee adjustments are to be adopted by the City Council by Resolution Section 2. That the City of Temecula approves the solid waste fee adjustments as shown in Exhibit "D" for fiscal year 1999/2000. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. p:\msep\98nttesw.rso PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOlYFFX), by the City Council of the City of Temecula this __ day of , 1999. ATTF_ST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNI~ OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECLRA ) 8S I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of , 1999, by the following vote: CO~CILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: CO~CItMEMBERS: p:\ruaep\98rate~w.rao CR&R SOLID WASTE MANA EMENT DIV SION 1706 GOETZ ROAD PERRIS, CA 92570 P. O. BOX 1208 PERRIS, CA 92572 FAX 909-657-5493 909-943-1991 March 23, 1999 Ms. Phyllis Ruse Deputy Director Community Services Departmere City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Re: Annual Consumer Price Index Increase Dear Phyllis: As provided for in the contract between the City of Temecula and CR&R Incorporated, the rates illustrated in Exhibit "D" shall be adjusted annually to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In reviewing the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for January 1998 through December 1998, the CPI increased by 1.4%. Per our agreement with the County of Riverside Waste Resources Management District, they can only increase our tipping fee by the change in CPI. However, they have elected based on last years expenditures to not increase the rate per ton. Based on the aforementioned, I have prepared the methodology as prescribed in the contract to pass these increased costs through. I have also prepared a new Exhibit "D" to reflect the incremental increases that will become effective July 1, 1999. Please review the attached and advise me if a meeting is desired or the rates as prepared are consistent with the contract. SDi~o~b President attachments , CITY of TEMECULA Exhibit "D" Schedule of Rates (effective July 1, 1999) Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer, and disposal grantee billing Monthly Rate: $ 14.38 Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting~ transfer, and disposal parcel charge ' Monthly Rate: $ 14.38 Mechanized single family detached residential additional refuse, composting, and recycling container - grantee billing Monthly Rate: $ 5.47 Single family detached residential additional bulky item pick up - grantee billing Pick Up Rate: $ 6.61 Commercial. industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic yard bin) with the following pick ups per week: 1 x week 2 x week 3 x week 4 :~. week 5 x week 6 x week 7 x week $ 64.82 $ 129.64 $ 194.46 $ 259.28 $ 324.10 $ 388.92 $ 453.74 Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates (one 3 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week: 1 x week $ 74.96 2 x week $ 149.92 3 x week $ 224.88 4 x week $ 299.84 5 x week $ 374.80 6 x week $ 449.76 7 x week $ 524.72 Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly: 2.5 x monthly rate Commercial, industrial, and multi-Family residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 3 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week: 1 x week $ 34.02 2 x week $ 68.04 3 x week $ 102.06 4 x week $ 136.08 5 x week $ 170.10 6 x week $ 204.12 7 x week $ 238.14 Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential refuse bin ) with the following pick ups per week: 1 x week 2 x week 3 x week 4 x week 5 x week 6 x week '7 x week. monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard $ 85.13 $ 170.26 $ 255.39 $ 340.52 $ 425.65 5''~ $ 595.91 Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rote: 2.5 x monthly rate Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week: 1 x week $ 45.06 2 x week $ 90.12 3 x week $ 135.18 4 x week $ 180.24 5 x week $ 225.30 6 x week $ 270.36 7 x week $ 315.42 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.' 16, 17. 18. 19. 20. Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate: Extra 3 cubic yard pick up: Redeliver and reinstatement rate: Roll-off disposal rate: Roll-off recycling rate: Roll-off compactor rate: Roll-off recycling compactor rate." "Hard to service" vehicle usage rate: "Hard to service" bin moving rate: Special bin lids (locking/CBL) rate: Deodorizing / replacing bin rate: $ 65.58 $ 34.00 $ 28.20 $150.82 + landfill/recycle fee $150.82 minus market value $ 301.64 + landfill/recycle fee $ 301.64 minus market value no charge no charge no charge no charge CITY OF TEMECULA Methodology The below methodology to pass through the CPI increase has been extracted from Exhibit "D", Section 21. Schedule of Rates 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. CPI: $14.22 per month x 78% x 1.4% CPI = $.16 Same as Number # 1 CPI: $5.41 per month x 78% x 1.4% CPI = $.06 CPI: $6.54 per month x 78% x 1.4% CPI = $.07 CPI: $64.18 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.64 CPI: $74.22 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.74 CPI: $33.69 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.33 CPI: $84.29 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.84 CPI: $44.59 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.47 CPI: $64.93 per load x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.65 CPI: $33.63 per pick up x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.37 CPI: $27.92 per occtk,'rence x 71.5% x ! .4% CP_~ = $.28 CPI: $148.74 per load x 1.4% CPI = $2.08 Same as Number #13 CPI: $297.48 per load x 1.4% CPI = $4.16 Same as Number #15 Total Increase:$. 16 per mo. Total Increase: $.06 per mo. Total Increase:$.07 per mo. Total Increase:$.64 per too. Total Increase: $.74 per mo. · Total Increase:$.33 per mo. Total Increase:$.84 per mo. Total Increase: $.47 per mo. Total Increase: $.65 per load Total Increase:$.37 per p/u Total !ncrease:$.28 per occ. Total Increase:S2.08 per load Total Increase:S4.16 per load BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS (415) 975-4567 04-26-99 10:46a Page 02 ITEM 8 APPROr~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO-' FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council ~rlerman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Cable Television Franchise Transfer PREPARED BY: Todd Holmes, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVSION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., TO CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, L.P. DISCUSSION: The City has a franchise agreement with TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. (TCI) to provide cable television to the citizens of Temecula. On November 18, 1998, TCI entered into an agreement with Century Communications Corp. (Century) to create a new limited partnership between the two corporations. This partnership will be known as Century- TCI California, L.P. (Century-TCI). Century has a 75% interest in the new partnership, and TCI has a 25% interest. Pursuant to both Federal law and local ordinance, this transaction requires City approval. Accordingly, TCI and Century have submitted an FCC Form 394, which is an application for franchise authority consent to assignment or transfer of control of the cable television franchise. This form was filed with the City on February 16, 1999. A copy of the transfer application package is on file in the office of the City Clerk. TCI was originally granted its franchise on the basis of its financial, legal and technical ability to operate the cable system. The purpose of City consent to the transfer is to insure that: (I) Century-TCI has the legal, financial and technical ability to operate the system; (ii) TCI is presently in full compliance with the terms of the franchise; and (iii) the financial terms of the agreement will not negatively impact cable operations. If these criteria are met, the City may not disapprove the transfer. The City Attorney's office has extensively reviewed the application and supporting material. No negative information was disclosed during the review that would preclude the City Council from making the findings that Century-TCI, as the proposed transferee, has the "financial, technical and legal qualifications" to ensure the performance of all of the obligations required under the existing cable television franchise agreement. The transfer will not change the termination date of the franchise, which will remain January 9, 2004. No change in the cable rates has been proposed in conjunction with this transfer. Pursuant to Federal regulation, the City has 120 days to approve or disapprove the transfer. However, if the City takes no action within the time limit, the application is "deemed approved" and the transfer may proceed. By formally authorizing the transfer, the City may recover the costs incurred in processing and evaluating the proposed transfer of the franchise. The time limit for City action on the transfer has been extended by mutual agreement. The extension allowed the City and Century-TCI additional time to finalize the details of the transfer. Century-TCI is a new entity with no "track record" related to the ownership and operation of cable television franchises. Consequently, the City Attorney requested that Century-TCI provide a guarantee of performance. The Assignment and Assumption Agreement that is attached as Exhibit A to the resolution requires that a guarantee of the new limited partnership's performance of its cable franchise obligations be provided by Century Communications Corp. This guarantee is set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A. Prior to the filing of the transfer application, TCI was acquired by AT&T. That acquisition was considered a transfer of control of TCI, rather than a transfer of the actual franchise. Under the terms of the City's franchise agreement, and franchise ordinance, a transfer of control does not require City approval. Adelphia Communications has recently announced its intention to acquire Century Communications. This action is also considered to be a transfer of control and will not require City approval. Following Adelphia's acquisition of Century's capital stock, Century-TCI will continue as the Franchisee. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will be reimbursed for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred in processing and evaluating the proposed transfer and assignment of the franchise, provided that those costs do not exceed ~2,500. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Schedule "1" RESOLUTION NO. 9~.._. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., TO CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, LP. WHEREAS, TCI Cablevision of Califomia, Inc., a Califomia Corporation ("Franchise"), is the duly authorized holder of a franchise ("Franchise") that authorizes the construction, operation, and maintenance of a cable television system within the City of Temecula ("Franchise Authority"); WHEREAS, On February 16, 1999, the Franchise Authority received from the Franchisee and from Cantury-TCI California, L.P. (Transferee"), an application for the assignment and transfer of the existing Franchise, which application included FCC Form 394 entitled 'Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise." Supplemental information was provided to the Franchise Authority by the Franchisee and the Transferee on Apdl 16, 1999; WHEREAS, In accordance with Section 5.12.080 of Chapter 5.12 of Title 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority has the dght to review and to approve the r~ancial, technical, and legal qualifications of the Transferee in connection with the proposed assignment and transfer of the Franchise; WHEREAS, The staff of the Franchise Authority has reviewed the documentation that accompanied FCC Form 394 end, based upon the representations set forth in that documentation, has concluded that the proposed Transferee has the requisite financial, technical, and legal qualifications to adequately perform, or to ensure the performance of, all obligations required of the Franchise under the Franchise, and that the Transferee will be bound by all existing terms, conditions, and obligations under the Franchise previously granted by the Franchise Authority to the Franchisee. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. In accordance with Section 5.12.080 of Chapter 5.12 of Title 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority consents to and approves the proposed assignment and transfer of the Franchise by TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. to Century-TCI Califomia, L.P., including such intermediate transfers as may be required to effectuate that ultimate assignment and transfer. Section 2. The authorization, consent and approval of the Franchise Authority to the porposed assignment and transfer is conditioned upon compliance by the Franchise or the Transferee with the following requirements, as to which they are jointly and severally responsible: A. The Franchisee and the Transferee will execute and file in the office of the City Clerk as "Assignment and Assumption Agreement" in substantially the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. The Mayor is authorized to execute that document and thereby Reso~9- I evidence the written consent of the Franchise Authority to the assignment and assumption of all dghts and obligations under the Franchise. B. An odginai or conformed copy of the written instrument evidendng the closing and consummation of the proposed transfer and assignment of the Franchise must be filed in the off.me of the City Clerk within 30 days after that dosing and consummation. C. The Franchise Authority will be reimbursed for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Franchise Authority in processing and evaluating the information relating to the proposed transfer and assignment of the Franchise; provided, however, that those costs and expenses will not exceed the sum of $2500 and will be set forth in an itemized statement transmitted by the City Manager, or the City Managers clesignee, to the Franchisee and the Tmnsferee within 30 days after the effective date of this Resolution. Section 3. Nothing contained in this Resolution may be construed to extend the term of the Franchise, which will terminate in its entirety on January 9, 2004. Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the following persons: Clifford A. Bail, Esq. Century-TCI Califomia, L.P. do Century Comrnunicetions Corp. 50 Locust Avenue New Canaan, Connecticut 06840 Ms. Kathy Ouillette TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. 4077 West Stetson Avenue Hemet, Califomia 92545 Section 5. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22"d day of June, 1999. A~E~: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Re~o~g9- 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular ~ting thereof held on the 22~ day of June, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND GUARANTEE OF ASSIGNEE' S OBLIGATIONS (CABLE TELEVISION FR3~NCHISE AGREEMENT) THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 1999, by and between TCI Cablevision of California, Inc., a California corporation ("Assignor"), Century-TCI California, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, ("Assignee"), and the City of Temecula, a California municipal corporation ("Franchise Authority"). RECITALS: A. Assignor is the authorized holder of a franchise that authorizes the construction, operation, and maintenance of a cable television system within the City of Temecula, California. Assignor's nonexclusive cable television franchise will expire by its terms on January 9, 2004. B. Subject to the prior consent of the Franchise Authority, Assignor desires to assign and transfer to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume, all rights, duties, and obligations under that certain cable television franchise agreement between the Franchise Authority and the Assignor that became effective on January 10, 1989, and was thereafter assigned ("Franchise Agreement"). THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Assignor assigns and transfers to Assignee all of Assignor's rights, duties, and obligations under the Franchise Agreement. 2. Assignee covenants and agrees with Assignor and with the Franchise Authority to assume all rights and to assume and perform all duties and obligations of the Assignor under the Franchise Agreement. 3. Franchise Authority consents to the assignment and transfer by Assignor to Assignee of all rights, duties, and obligations specified in the Franchise Agreement, contigent upon the execution by Century Communications Corp., as guarantor, of the "Guarantee of Assignee's Obligations" that is attached as Schedule 1 to this Agreement. 990526 11086-00068 syc 0594015 2 TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth below the authorized signature. APPROVED AS TO FORM: "ASSIGNOR" TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. By: (authorized corporate officer) Title: Date: Legal Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM: Legal Counsel "ASS IGNEE" Century-TCI California, L.P. By: Century Exchange LLC, General Partner By: Century Southwest Cable Television, Inc., Managing Member By: (Authorized Officer) Title: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney "FRANCHISE AUTHORITY" CITY OF TEMECULA Mayor Date: ATTEST: City Clerk 990526 11086-00068 syc 0594015 2 A - 2 SCHEDULE 1 to ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT GUARANTEE OF ASSIGNEE'S OBLIGATIONS In consideration for the Franchise Authority's consent to the assignment and transfer of the Franchise Agreement that is referenced in this Agreement, the undersigned entity unconditionally guarantees the performance by Assignee of its obligations under that Franchise Agreement. "GUARANTOR,, Century Communications Corp., a Texas corporation By: (Authorized Corporate Officer) Title: Date: 990526 11086-00068 syc 0594015 WlJJAM I, IqUOIL~ RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON A1TORNE'Y'S AT LAW RICHARD RICHARO S (191e-lgB,B) THIRTY-EIGHTH FLCK)R LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 9,0071-14.89 (213} 1214414 FACSIMILE (213) 121-0078 WILL.IAMK. 1,0:INVlER OUR RLE NUMBER 99904-00059 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: SOME PRACTICE TIPS FOR GENERAL PRACTITIONERS FROM A GENERAL PRACTITIONER presented by ~rIT-T-TA~ B. RIdDELL to the II:~.'F., CITY AITORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY at its PYNUAL CONFERENCE PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA on the E~ES OF MARCH 1997 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 1 · I. SOURCES OF USEFUL INFORMATION 'A. THE WORLD WIDE WEB - INTERNET SITES 1. Federal Communications Commission: http:/www.fcc.gov/ 2. California Public Utilities Commission: http:/www.cpuc.ca.gov/ 3. California State Senate: http:/www.sen.ca. gov/ 4. California State Assembly: http:/www.assembly.ca. gov/ 5. National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors: http:/www.natoa. org/ TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY PUBLICATIONS 1. Cable World (weekly publication) 2. Multichanncl News (weekly publication) OTHER PUBLICATIONS 1. e , Multichannel Video Compliance Guide (monthly publication) "Nation's Cities Weekly," published by the National League of Cities, Washington, D.C. The Telecommunications Act of 1996: Law & Legislative History, published by Pike & Fischer, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland The California Municipal Law Handbook (1995 edition), Chapter Ix/, pp. 89- 97, published by the League of California Cities Telecommunications: Planning for the Future (1996), published by the International City/County Management Association, Washington, D.C. The Telecommunications Act of 1996: What It l~ns to Local Governments (1996), published by the National League of Cities and Public Technology, Inc. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 2 STATUTES AND CODES 47 United StaBs Code Annotated ("Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs") California Government Code (numerous provisions - See Municipal Law Handbook) California Public Utilities Code (numerous provisions - See Municipal Law Handbook) CONSULTING FIRMS CI'here are many competent consulting firms that offer services to municipalities in connection with cable-television franchise renewals, cable-television rate regulations, needs assessments, technical reviews, etc.) ORGANIZATIONS Many public agency attomeys involved with telecommunications matters belong to NATOA ,- the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors. Membership in this national organization automaiically (upon payment of a $10 fee) entities California attorneys to membership in a regional chapter known as "SCAN/ NATOA." "SCAN" means Southern California and Nevada. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 3 II. GLOSSARY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS TERMSv Here's a "starter kit" for your own personal glossary of a bewildering array of new terms, abbreviations, and acronyms that have become pan of the jargon of the tilecommunications industry: access channels are set aside by the cable operator for use by the public, educational insti- tutions, municipal government, or for lease on a non-d~scriminatory basis. analog is a type of electrical signal that resembles the original source. For example, an analog watch uses two hands circling to represent hours and minutes in a continuous man- ner, as opposed to a digital watch, which measures time in discrete units. The watch with hands is .analogous to continuous time. An analog signal over a telephone converts voice into continuous electrical impulses. Most telephone lines today use analog signals, but special phone equipment can process digital signals. The wireless telephone industry has just con- verted to either digital or some combination of digital and analog to increase their capacity within bandwidth. Analog transmissions have much less capacity, in terms of both volume and speed, than digital transmissions. See digital. Ultimately, the information superhigh- way will be digital. backbone is the term used to describe the major, high volume routes connecting major points along the information highway from which other lesser volume, and potentially lesser speed, routes travel to other points. Most of the backbone is fiber optic cable. The big issue in con- structing the information superhighway is not necessarily the backbone, but what wires and services will be provided to the 'curb," which is your home or office. 'bandwidth is used to measure the transmission capacity or frequency of a particular me- dium, wired or wireless. Digital transmission rates are usually measured in bits per second, and when digital data is converted to frequencies for transmission it may be measured in cycles per second, or hertz, where one frequency .cycle is one hertz. A frequency measure is equal to or greater than bits per second. Bandwidth determines the capacity of a particular transmission. For example, the highest bandwidths are necessary for transfer of'pictures and video images, whereas narrow bandwidths are sufficient for many data and voice trans- missions. Narrowband Wideband Broadband I 0 bps 64Kbps 128Kbps 1.SMbps 45Mbps 155Mbps 600+Mbps bps = bits per second _*/ Source: Telecommunications: Planning for the Future (19q6), published by International City/County Management Association, Washington D.C. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 4 basic cable is usually the minimum amount of cable TV service available to a subscriber for a standard installation and monthly fee. It generally includes over-the-air broadcast signais and local originations. baud is the number of times that a signal changes its pattern each second. For example, 9600 baud changes its signal 9,600 times each second (by contemporary standards, this is a slow transmission rate). bit or binary digit is the single digit, zero or one (0, 1), and is the basis for the byte and all digital transmissions. Eight bits equal one byte, and originally most chips in 'personal com- puters were eight bit. Now there are sixteen and thirty-two bit chips in the personal com- puter. bits per second (bps) is the speed of transmission measured in bits per second. The actual bps will exceed the baud rate. broadband technologies transmit large amounts of data, voice, and especially video. These high frequency, high bits per second transmissions must be carried over coaxial or optical fiber cables or wireless. See bandwidth. cellular service is wireless telephone service within a defined geographic area or "cell." Most systems today are capable of handing off calls from one cell to another when a person travels. Most cellular phone systems use narrowband technologies and most have now moved to digital transmissions but still use some analog signals. coaxial cable is a pencil-thick cable with a central insulated conducting wire surrounded by insulation and an aluminum or copper casing. The coaxial cable can carry far more informa- tion than copper "twisted pair' telephone lines, but less than fiber optics cable. It is rela- tively inexpensive and is commonly used for cable TV. common carrier is a company that supplies local and long-distance telecommunications services to the public. A common carrier must be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission and its prices and services are usually regulated. The regulatory goal is to assure that services considered essential to the public are provided on an open and non- discriminatory basis to those willing and able to pay for them. Before 1995, telephone com- panies were considered common carriers, while cable TV operaton were not. competitive access providers (CAPs) are companies that compete with monopoly local telephone companies by installing their own transmission networks to connect large busi- ness customers directly to long distance carriers, thus avoiding the access charge, or to pro- vide other local phone services. compression, digital or data compression is a technique for encoding data so that it takes up less computer space and time for processing. A common method of compression is elimi- nating blank spaces in a fixed field, such as a name or address. digital is a type of electrical signal that is usually broken down into binary digits (0, 1). See bit. All modern computers and most every peripheral device use digital processing. The great advantage of digital processing and transmission is increased speed and volume, or capacity. Think of how much faster it is to change the time on a digital watch as opposed to an analog watch with two hands. direct broadcast satellite service (DBS) is a system in which signals are transmitted directly from a satellite to a small (18') h6me receiving dish. DBS refers specifically to high- power transmissions in bands specified by the FCC, rather than current C-band, which home satellite dishes receive. DBS competes with cable television. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 5 distance learning is education with one-Way or tWo-way interactive voice and video pre- sentations. Sometimes referred to as the virtual classroom. distance learning is particularly appealing in rural areas. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was created by the Communication Act of 1934 to regulate radio and television broadcasting, but now has greatly enlarged its scope to in~l~tdo ~ablc, wireless, and satellite tranamnsions. Th~ FGG has become the prtmar!/regu- lator ot the in~'ormation sup, rhighway. Ths FCC is now roads ui} of ~v~ persons from bo~h parties nominated by the President and approved by the Senate for five-year toms, one expiring each year. The FCC licenses and auctions bandwidth to private intorests, and is charged with developing regulations to implement the Telecommunications Act of 1996. fiber optics is a form of transmission that uses light, as opposed to electricity, in order to transmit information. Thin, flexible strands of glass or plastic are used to transmit data at much higher rates and volume than traditional coppar or coaxial wires using electrical impulses. Optical fiber provides much greater bandwidth than either copper wires or coaxial cables (a single strand can carry 12,000 telephone conversations at once), consumes less electricity, and is insensitive to electromagnetic glitches. It cannot transmit electrical power. franchise is a contractual agreement between a cable operator and a governmental body which defines the rights and responsibilities of each in the construction and operation of a cable TV system. Commonly a franchise fee is paid as compensation for use of public right- of-way for private gain. For example, a private company may pay a municipality a franchise fee for putting fiber optic cable alongside railroad tracks, or a cable TV company may pay a fee to use public streets and easements for running its cable. The right to collect a franchise fee was originally established in the 1866 Telegraph Act and reaffirmed in the Telecommuni- cations Act of 1996. Franchise fees may be regulated by state statutes. The majority of states .allow compensation to local governments for granting the use of rights-of-way. hybrid fiber-coax is'an architecture for new broadband networks that has been adopted by many cable and telephone companies (including Pacific Bell and TCI) to deliver video, tele- phone, and data services. Some projects use fiber optic cable to carry signals to neighbgrho0d nodes. The final connection to homes is made with lower-cost coaxial cable. Other hybrid networks use fiber optic cable to carry signals to the "curb" and then coaxial to the home. intranet is an internal network that uses the power of a World Wide Web server to integrate various hardware and software platforms, in order.to facilitate communication and exchange of information within an organization or work group. independent telephone company is a privately or publicly owned company that is not affiliated with offe of the regional Bell operating companies. There are about 1,300 indepen- dent phone companies with about 22 percent of the telephone access lines that serve large portions of the United States. integrated services digital network (ISDN) is an international telecommunications standard for the digital transmission of data, voice and video, or a digital telephone service. It is a technology designed to increase the capacity of copper telephone wires up to 64Kbps thus permitting simultaneous transmission of hundreds of communications, multipage faxing, and fair-quality video images. ISDN uses one channel to carry the information and a second channel to control information signaling. ISDN lines are not wi.dely available to residential areas but can be found in most large commercial areas. Broadband ISDN, which is regarded by some as the future of communications for the information superhighway, uses broadhand transmissions on fiber optic cables at speeds of up to 150 megabits per second. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 6 interactive is the near instantaneous two-way dialogue between two users or between t~s- ers and their computer. Interactive is an important feature of such applications as e-mail, CD-ROMs, home shopping, cable TV video rentals, or distance learning. In the future it is expected that most applications will be required to be interactive in order to gain user accep- tance on the information superhighway. internet is a network of networks. The Interact consists of all those computers that provide access and work together to form a seamless web of users and servers. The Interact actually grew out of the Department of Defense where the need to support military research led to the development of something called the Interact Protocol (IF), a way to address and send mes- sages from one computer to another. The National Science Foundation then used the Internet Protocol to chain together computers on university campuses across the country. This net- work of computers has grown to include thousands of public, private, and non-profit comput- ers. Today the Interact is managed by a group of invited volunteers called the Internet Architecture Board and a host of task forces and working groups. leased lines are permanently connected private telephone lines between two places. Leased lines are used to connect major networks. local area network (LAN) is a network of computers within a confined area such as an office suite or building. A personal computer on a LAN can work either alone or in concert with the other computers on the LAN. ALAN is usually made up of file servers, worksta- tions, a network operating system, and communications links. The LAN can be connected to other networks. local exchanZe carriers (LEGs) are the local telephone companies. There are 1,327 local exchange carriers in the nation, 19 of which are affiliated with one of the seven regional Bell operating companies. GTE corporation is the parent company for 23 LEGs. local loop is the term used to refer to the local telephone exchange. microwave transmission is a way of providing bandwidth via a series of antennae, trans- mitters, and reflectors on towers. Very short radio waves carrying voice,.data, or video com- munications travel in a straight line from tower to tower. Microwave can be made fully compatible with digital service. modem (modulate and demodulate) is a device on a computer that connects the computer to a transmission line, typically a phone line. It changes digital information to wave form and back again. Speed is the main criterion when choosing a modem. See baud or bps. multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS) is a private service using very high frequencies to transmit more than one TV signal. Also known as wireless cable. national information infrastructure is the Clinton administration's name for the infor- mation highway. It is 'a web of advanced communications networks, computers, databases and consumer electronics that will put vast amounts of information at users' fingertips." The national information infrastructure initiative produced an Agenda for Action in 1993 with the policy goals stated as: Promote private sector investment Extend universal access concept Promote technological innovation Promote seamless, interactive, user-driven operation Ensure information security and network reliability .Improve management of radio frequency spectrum RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 7 Protect intellectual property rights Coordinate with other levels of government and nations Provide access to government information. National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) is the federal agency within the Department of Commerce that is charged with developing the national infor- mation infrastructure. . network is an arrangement of computers that are interconnected and provide some level of communication and sharing of information among the members or nodes of the network. There are a number of different topologies and types of networks and protocols for sharing data. With communications capability every computer can belong to one or more networks. online services are the commercial companies such as America Online, CompuServe, Delphi, Prodigy, GEnie and many others that offer information services to individual subscribers for . monthly access charges. open access is a policy goal to give all persons nondiscriminatory access to network facili- ties, services, functions, and information where technically feasible and economically rea- sonable. open systems architecture refers to computer systems that are designed to be indepen- dent of any vendor-specific requirements and can therefore interconnect with a variety of products. It is expected that open systems architecture will be the general policy followed by most developers on the information highway. -open video system (OVS) is a concept introduced by the Telecommunicati0ns Act of 1996 and replaces the video dial tone concept in the federal regulatory lexicon. Under FCC rules to be developed to implement the Act, a local. exchange carrier (the local phone company) or a cable company providing cable services can select only one-third of the channels to be programmed on the system. The other two-thirds of the channels are to be made available to programmers under non-discriminatory rates, terms, and conditions. OVS providers are to have some reduced regulatory burdens under the new FCC rules, but--of critical importance to local governments--may be subject to fees similar to franchise fees, though a typical cable franchise is not required if the company gets an OVS certificate of compli~mce from the FCC. See video dial tone. packet switchin~ is a system whereby long messages are broken down into short segments, or packets, for rapid transmission. Packets can vary from 40 to 32,000 bytes, but are usually less than 1,500 bytes long. Packets of information are transmitted using code-divided or time-divided protocols, but they are received in a seemingly continuous manner. For example, even though your transmitted voice over a cellular phone is broken up into thousands of packets the received voice transmission will sound continuous. Packet switching is an eco- nomical, fast means of digital communication. pay-per-view is cable programming for which subscribers pay on a one-time basis for indi- vidual programs, such as prize fights and movie premiers. personal communications services (PCSs) or personal communications networks (PCNs) are digital wireless communications technology such as personal ~agers, cellular telephones, personal laptops with.modems, etc. Such mobile technology promises to allow each consumer to use the same telephone number wherever he or she goes. The FCC has auctioned off licenses for several PCS networks in each region. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 8 platform is the type of hardware architecture used by a particular network or family of computers. In the world of personal computing the .IBM-compatible/Intel chip and the Apple/ Motorola chip have traditionally been two. separate platforms. UNIX systems or VAX sys- tems are also different hardware platforms. The issue on the information superhighway is being able to communicate across platforms. public, educational, and government (PEG) access to local cable television is provided to communities who want it by virtue of the 1984 Cable Act via channels set aside for these purposes. Public access is an important principle which needs to apply to all telecommunica- tions and information systems and services used by the public, which are paid for in part by public funds and taxes or franchise fees. public switched 'network is a worldwide telecommunications system that provides com- munications services between all telephones or other equipment. In the U.S., regulated local exchange carriers make the public switched network universally available at a reasonable cost. regional Bell operating companies (RBOCs) are the seven regional holding companies that were created with the breakup of AT&T in 1982. The seven RBOCs are Ameritech, Bell Atlantic, BellSouth, NYNEX, Pacific Telesis, Southwestern Bell and US West. In some cases these RBOCs subsumed local operating companies. rights-of-way are the public access routes such as roads, underground conduits, overhead wires, and railroads that are controlled by local governments. In most states, the state has title and authority to regulate and control rights-of-way, but that authority is usually del- egated by statute to local governments. satellite master antenna television service (SMATV) is a system consisting of a ~eceive-only satellite earth station and a master antenna that receives over'the'air'televi- sion broadcast signals. These signals are combined and distributed through cable to sub- scribers residing in multi-unit dwellings. spectrum allocations refer to the bandwidth that is allocated by the Federal Commu- nications Commission. Very recently the FCC auctioned off a portion of the bandwidth that was previously reserved for government use to commercial firms interested in personal communications devices. Spectrum allocations are becoming an increasingly significant source of revenue for the federal government. switched access is a network or telephone cofinection that can be turned on and off as needed. Your normal telephone service is switched access because it allows you to create a link when you call and destroy that link when you hang up. twisted pair ~rire is a .cable consisting of insulated copper wire organized in distinct pairs that are twisted around each other in order to identify each separate circuit and reduce electrical interference. Individual pairs of wire are the primary path between a customer's premises and the telephone company's local central office. Twisted pair wire has been stan- dard in the telephone industry for decades and provides the least expensive way to connect to the information superhighway. unbundling is the practice of offering telecommunications services, programs, software, training, and hardware separately. RBOCs traditionally provided services 'bundled" into packages, until the FCC in 1992 forced them to offer those components unbundled so that communications vendors and customers ~ould pick and choose among services. universal service is the public policy goal that Congress first mandated in the 1934 Com- munications Act to make telephone service widely available at affordable prices. Universal service has been variously defined, and its definition .;vill continue to evolve as the FCC RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 9 implements the Telecommunications Act of 1996. A less ambitious definition of universal service might include public access to the information superhighway from every school, hos- pital, government office, library, and post office; a more ambitious definition would include public access from every household. video dial tone (VDT) is the phrase used to describe access to movies and other video programming over telephone lines. With advances in transmission technologies and the increasing use of optical fibber, telephone companies can provide video services that effec- tively allow them to compete with cable companies and television broadcasters. See open video systems. video conferencing or teleconferencing is the near simultaneous transmission of voice and video between two or more groups or individuals. The transmissions can be one-way but are preferably two-way. Several new computer systems provide point-to-point video conferencing over ISDN phone lines. video programmer is any provider of video programs, such as cable operators, broadcast- ers, and satellite program distributors. Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, tele- phone companies are allowed to own and offer video programs. wired is a term used to describe communications over wires. The three major types of wired communications are copper wire (telephones), coaxial cable (cable TV), and fiber optics. There are various types and grades of wires within each of these categories. · wireless is a term used to describe communications without wires, such as local cellular' ".phones, microwave transmissions, and satellite networks. wide area network (WAN) is a geographically dispersed network of computers. World Wide Web (WWW) is a hypertext system that allows users to find related informa- tion quickly on the Internet. It can support audio, pictures, and video in addition to text and data. Software tools developed to provide Web access to information sites can allow communication and exchange of data among otherwise incompatible hardware and software systems. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page I0 OVERVIEW OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996~ Introduction The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "1996 Act") made significant changes to federal telecommunications law. It is the most comprehensive legislation pertaining to communications to be adopted since the Communications Act of 1934. It affects telephone companies, broadcasters, cable operators, wireless communication services, on-line computer services, other providers of communication services, consumers, and public agencies. The sheer bulk of the legislation is daunting; however, many provisions do not affect the regulatory powers of cities. This overview summarizes those provisions of the 1996 Act that potentially affect 'a city's regulatory powers and its role as a provider and facilitator of telecommunica~on services. This discussion covers the following five primary categories: B. C. D. E. Television Service Siting of Antenna Towers Regulation of Satellite Dishes and Services Regulation of Public. Right-of-Way Use Comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance Discussion Television Service 1. Changes in Competition Rules. The 1996 Act authorizes telephone companies to provide television service in competition with cable operators. Similarly, cable operators may pwvide local telephone and other telecommunication services in competition with local telephone companies. The primary goal of the 1996 Act is to encourage competition among all telecommunication providers and to substantially eliminate the barriers under prior law that prevented certain telecommunication companies from providing other _1/ This is the 0nly footnote you have to read. It credits Gregory W. Stepanicich, a parmei' in the fu'm of Richards, Watson & Gershon, with primary authorship of this "Overview." This is the expurgated version of that opus. It is now suitable for CAALAC and for dramatization on stage, screen, radio and television. Watch your local listings! RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 11 types of services. A basic premise of the new law is that, by encouraging competition" between cab. le operators and local telephone companies, prices will be controlled and improved service will result. 2. Cable Television. Many provisions of the 1984 and 1992 Cable Acts are unaffected by the 1996 Act. However, important changes have been made. Cities currently have the power to regulate subscriber rates for the basic service tier under FCC rules that provide an objective formula for determining rates that may be charged. Cities do not have the authority to determine rates based upon quality of service or other subjective factors. Federal law requires the basic service tier to include local broadcast channels and the PEG (public, educational, and governmental) access channels. The cable operator can add other channels to the basic service tier at its discretion. The FCC regulates the subscriber rates for the cable programming service tier (CPST), which consists of the nonbasic and nonpremium channels. Pay-per-view and premium channels (e.g., HBO and Showtime) have been excluded from rate regulation. Under the 1996 Act, the term "effective competition" has been redefined. Now, when a local telephone company provides video programming in the area served by the cable provider, and the video programming is comparable to that provided by the cable operator, effective competition is deemed to exist, and the City may no longer regulate the subscriber rates for the basic service tier. With restx~t to the CPST channels, rate regulation by the FCC will be eliminated on March 31, 1999 (approximately three years frbm tile effective date of ~e 1996 Act). PacBell may be initiating television service by microwave technology by the spring of 1997. If a comparable level of service is provided, cities will lose their power tO regulate subscriber rates for the basic service tier provided by their cable operators. Under prior law, cable subscribers could file complaints directly with the FCC regarding the rates charged for CPST channels. Under ~e 1996 Act, only the City may file a complaint and only within the time deadlines specified by the new law. Under the 1996 Act, cities retain the power to franchise and to regulate cable television services provided by the cable operator. However, cities are prohibited from requiring a cable franchise for other types of telecommunlcation services that cable operators are now authorized to provide. Thus, a cable operator that provides telephone services cannot bc required to pay a local franchise fee on these new services. A city's ability to regulate other types of service must be reviewed on a case by case basis. For example, the City of Fremont is collecting its 5 % cable franchise fee on the Internet service provided by TCI to its cable subscribers. However, cable operators can be expected to take an aggressive position in 'protecting' their rights under federal law to provide..felecommunlcation services free from a city's franchise fee. The law is clear that a city may not prohibit its cable operator from entering other types of telecommunica[ion businesses. As cable companies do RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 12 so, it will be more difficult to accurately determine the franchise fee that is payable by the cable operator, as revenues from the different .types of services will have to be segregated in order to determine the fee owed. Also, as pan of any franchise renewal, a city may not require its cable operator to provide non-cable related telecommunication services or facilities, other than an institutional network. The procedural and substantive requirements for the renewal of cable television franchises were not changed by the 1996 Act. Either a city may initiate, or the Cable operator may request, formal renewal proceedings within the 6 month period commencing with the 36th month prior to expiration of the franchise. These proceedings require notices and public participation for a process whose purpose is to: (1) identify the future cable-related community needs and interests, and (2) review the past performance of the cable operator. If this process is neither invoked nor requested, the city and its cable operator may informally negotiate the renewal of the franchise in accordance with whatever process may be desired, except that at least one noticed public hearing is required before a renewal may be approved. The standards for evaluating the renewal of a cable franchise are limited by federal law to consideration of the following: a. Whether the cable operator has substantially complied with the material terms of the existing franchise. b. Whether the quality of the operator's services, including signal quality, response to consumer complaints, and billing practices, but without regard to the mix or quality of cable services or other services provided over the system, has been reasonable in light of community needs. c. Whether the operator has the financial, legal, and technical ability to provide the .services, facilities, and equipment as set forth in the operator' s proposal. d. Whether the operator's proposal is reasonable to meet the future cable-related community needs and interests, taking into account the cost of meeting such needs and interests. These provisions are summarized because many cities must begin preparing for the renewal process that will occur in a technological environment that is far different from what existed years ago when cable franchises were last granted or renewed. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 13 3. Telephone Companies. The 1996 'Act gives local telephone companies four methods by which to provide local television service in competition with franehised cable operators. These four methods are as follows: a. Wireless Cable. Wireless cable is a System by which 'the telephone company will transmit its programming over the air by way of a microwave technology. Satellites are not used. This type of service is commonly referred to as multichannel, multipoint distribution services (MMDS). If this method is used, no franchise can be required by a city unless public right-of-way is used for the delivery of the service. We understand that the PaeBell plans do not involve the use of public right-of-way. Thus, franchise fee revenues will be lost for each subscriber dollar. that pays for this type of service rather than cable television service that is provided under a franchise. b. Traditional Cable. Telephone companies may provide video programming in the same manner as a cable operator by obtaining a franchise to use the public right-of-way for the delivery of that service. All curren~y existing 1984 and 1992 Cable Act requirements would' apply. Franchise fees would be paid at 5 % of subscriber revenue, and PEG channel requirements would apply. c. Common Carrier. Tilephone companies may provide video programming as a common carrier free from any local government regulation. As a common carrier, the telephone company would transmit the video programming of others over lines leased to those persons. It would have no editorial control over the .content of .the - programming provided by others. Itwould simply act as aconduit for the transmission. - Under this method, no franchise fees are paid, and no PEG channel requirements apply. d. Open Video System (OVS). An open video system is a new creation of the 1996 Act. It is not a new technology, but rather a legal construct by which a telephone company can deliver video programming subject to different regulatory rules. Under an OVS, the telephone company provides its own video programming service, but it is also required to make up to two-thirds of its system capacity available to independent programmers unaffiliated with the telephone company. A city may not require a local franchise from an OVS operator, because the operator receives its certification to operate from the FCC. However, a city may impose an in-lieu fee of up to 5 % of subscriber revenues and may impose the same PEG channel requirements that are imposed on its cable operator. Most cities have not yet adopted a tilecommunications ordinance that imposes these requirements on a future OVS operator. 4. Direct-to-Home Satellite Services. The 1996 Act grants to the FCC exclusive jurisdiction to regulate Direct-to-Home Satellite Services (such as Direct-TV). Specifically, proriders of these services are exempt from the collection of any tax or fee imposed by cities. The 1996 Act does not prohibit a state from taxing Direct-to-Home RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 14 Satellite 'Services, and a state may transfer all or a portion of these revenues to local governments. 5. CillyActions. Cities should consider the following: a. Adoption of an ordinance imposing the 5 % in-lieu fee and PEG channel requirements on OVS operators. b. Meeting with its franchised cable operator to review plans, if any, to provide new types of telecommunications services. c. If the cable television franchise will expire within the next 3 years, commence preliminary discussions on the process that your city desires to follow in evaluating the renewal of the cable franchise. Siting of Antenna Towers 1. New limitations Section 704 of the 1996 Act [47 U.S.C. 332(c)C/)] preserved cities' zoning power over the installation of antenna towers and other Cellular facilities by the personal wireless telecommunications industry. Personal wireless telecommunications services include cellular telephone, paging, and data transmission services. An example of this service is Metricom's proposal to install on light poles many sinnil antennas that transmit business data to subscribers. A city's zoning power over these types. of facilities is subject to the following limitations imposed by the 1996 Act: a.. Local regulation may not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. b. Local regulation may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. c. All requests for such facilities must be acted upon within a reasonable period of time after the request is ~ed, tnlring into account the nature and scope of the request. The time required for a city to process similar land use requests should be considered reasonable. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 15 d. Any decision to deny a 'request must be in writing and suppOrted by substantial evidence contained in a written record. This is the legal test for reviewing quasi-judicial decisions, such as a decision on a conditional use permit or a planned development review. e. No state or local government may regulate the placement of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions. The FCC has adopted radio frequency emission regulations that are preemptive and that control exclusively. f. Recourse against a public agency for denying or conditioning such a facility in an objectionable manner must be taken to the courts within 30 days, rather than to the FCC. Recently, a federal District Court in Sprint Spectrum L.P.v. City of Medina, 924 F.Supp. 1036 (W.D. Wash. 1996), upheld a city ordinance that imposed a six-month moratorium on antenna towers while the city prepared a penanent regulatory ordinance. Although the above limitations apply to a city's zoning power, a city has complete discretion as to whether these facilities should be located on its own property, provided that a city does not act in a discriminatory manner against different personal wireless service providers. For example, it would be risky to authorize L.A. Cellular to place its facilities on city-owned property pursuant to a lease, but not authorize .Air Touch' Cellular to install a similar facility if it was willing to agree to the same lease terms and if space was reasonably available for that use. 2, CiBr Actions Each city should evaluate its current zoning requirements related to the placement of antennas and similar structures to determine whether new regulations should be adopted. Regulation of Satellite Dishes 1. New FCC Pre-emption Regulation Section 207 of the 1996 Act directed the FCC to adopt regulations imposing restrictions on the ability of viewers to receive certain video programming services. On August 6, 1996, the FCC adopted its final rule prohibiting ordinances that impair the installation, maintenance, or use of small antennae used to receive video programming. FilCHARC)S, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 16 The FCC's new rule applies to residentially-zoned properties having the following types of antennae: a. An antenna designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service (including direct-to-home satellite services such as Direct-TV) that is one meter (39 inches) or less in diameter; b. An antenna designed to receive video programming services via multipoint distribution services (the system proposed by PacBell) that is one meter (39 _ inches) or less in diameter; or c. An antenna designed to receive over-the-air television broadcast signals regardless of size. The new rule also applies to any satellite earth station antenna that is two meters or less in diameter and located in an area that is zoned commercial or industrial. Previously,. city ordinances were preempted if they differentiated between satellite antenna,~ and other types of antenna facilities. However, the FCC made exceptions for regulations that: (i) have a health, safety or aesthetic objective; and (ii) do not prevent reception of satellite signals. .. · The revised rule proMbiB all' regulations that impair the installation. maintenance.' or'use of antennae to provide the video programming services specified .above. Thus, 'any restrictions that "impair" acc~s to these services are preempted even if they do not discriminate as to the type of antenna. For the purposes of this rule, "'impair" means that the regulation: (i) unreasonably delays or prevents installation, maintenance, or use; (ii) unreasonably increases the cost of installation, maintenance, or use; or {iii) precludes reception of an acceptable quality signal. · The revised rule exempts only safety regulations and regulations that protect historic districts. Thus, regulations with an aesthetic objective are no longer specifically exempt. Further, any safety regulation must be essential to achieve a clearly defined safety objective stated in the text, preamble, or legislative history of the restriction. Also, such a restriction must apply to. the extent practicable to other devices and fixtures that are comparable in size, height, and appearance (such as air conditioning equipment). An unanswered question is how the FCC will determine which city regulations "impair" individual access to video programming services. In particular, limitations on the height of antennae or masts that support satellite antennae are still permitted, so long as there is room for exception by permit or otherwise to ensure an acceptable quality signal. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 17 In the Report and Order that published the final revisions to the rule, the FCC provides gUidance on implementing the revision. In' particular, the FCC found that restrictions on antenna height and installation contained in the Building Officials & Code Administrator~ 'International, Inc. Code (BOCA) provide a model of a "safety-related" restriction. Although the FCC referred solely to the restrictions adopted under BOCA, the discussion is of general applicability: "Because we believe that the model antenna height and installation restrictions in the BOCA code are safety-related, they will be enforceable under our rule. We do not believe it will be overly burdensome to require, as is provided in the BOCA code, that antenna users obtain a permit in cases in which their antennas must extend more than twelve feet above the roo~ine in order to receive signals. However. we would find unenforceable any restriction that establishes specific per se height limits." Similarly, city codes requiring an antenna to be "screened" or painted a certain color are still permissible, so long as the costs of complying with the restrictions are not unreasonable in light of the cost of the equipment or services and the visual impact of the antenna. For example, an ordinance cannot require a minimally intrusive antenna to be hidden by exorbitanfly priced materials or landscaping. Additionally, a city's treatment of Similarly. visible devices,- such as air conditioners, will also be taken into consideration in determining the'reasonableness of a city's antenna regulations. Any ordinance that, as applied, precludes reception of an acceptable quality signal will also be deemed to "impair" access to services. The FCC Report and' Order cited above provides some clarification as to how a determination will be made: "Under this criterion, for example, our rule would invalidate a requirement that an antenna be placed in a position where reception would be impossible or would be substantially degrade. However, a regulation requiring that antennas be placed to the extent feasible in locations that are not visible from the street would be permitted under our rule, if this placement would not impair reception of an acceptable signal." The FCC did not provide clear guidelines concerning the preemption of set- back requirements. However, the FCC found that permit requirements in connection with set-backs are "safety-related' rules. Thus, they appear to reinair enforceable under the revision. However, FCC comments in a later section of the Report and Order stated that regulations requiring an antenna to beset back from the street "could be deemed to impair RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 18 reception if compliance .would mean that the antenna could not receive an acceptable Signal." Thus, a city can most effectively comply with the new rule by making special provisions for individuals who cannot receive adequate reception without violating the set-back regulations. The FCC rule applies not only a city's zoning regulations, but also to CC&Rs and other private land use restrictions. 2. City Actions We recommend that cities consider revisions to current ordinances that regulate satellite dishes. 1996 Act. Regulation of Public Right-of-Way Use 1. Limits on Right-of-Way Regulation A city's control over its public right-of-way is addressed by Section 253 of the Subsection (a) of this section provides as follows: "No state or local statute or regulation, or other state or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service." ' Subsection (c) states: "Nothing in this section affects the authority of a state or local government to manage the public rights-of-way or to require fair and reasonable compensation from telecommunications providers on a cbmpett'tively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis, for use of public rights-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis, if the compensation required is publicly disclosed by such government." Subsection (c), commonly referred to as a "safe harbor" provision, was an important addition to the 1996 Act. It preserved the power of local agencies to manage the use of their public rights-of-way. At the same time, subsection (a) provides that cities may not impose legal requirements that prohibit the delivery of telecommunication services. The 1996 Act fails to define the term "prohibit.' As a means to enforce the provisions of subsection (a), subsection (d) authorizes the FCC to preempt state and local requirements that RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 19 violate this subsection. This type of preemption may be expected to occur on a. case-by-Case basis. Currently, there is a signifmant petition before the FCC that was fred by TCI' against the City of Troy. In the Matter of TCI Cablevision of Oakland County. Inc.; File No. CSR47890. TCI contends that Troy's local right-of-way management policies should be preempted by the FCC under subsection (d). The City of Troy, supported by the National League of Cities and many public agencies, asserts that the preemption provisions of subsection (d) do not apply to right-of-way management policies and regulations that fall within the safe harbor of subsection (c). According to this argument, any legal requirement imposed under subsection (c) can be challenged by an aggrieved party only in a court action. The ultimate resolution of this issue is important to all cities. The federal statute must be read in conjunction with California law concerning the use of city streets by telephone companies. California law is clear that cities may not franchise telephone companies that provide telephone services under a state franchise. Public Utilities Code Section 7901. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco, 51 Cal.2d 766, 771 (1959); Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco, 197 Cal. App. 2d 133 (1961). A city, however, may require a telephone company to obtain an excavation or encroachment permit and to pay all rehted regulatory fees prior to the use of its streets. A city cannot require that additional compensation be paid for use of the right- of-way. In 1995, the Public UtiLities Code was amended to add Section 7901.1. This section provides that municipalities have the right to exercise reasonable control as to the time, place, and manner in which roads and highways are accessed. For any controls to be considered reasonable, all entities must be treated in an equal manner. Public Utilities Code Section 234 defines "telephone corporation" to include every corporation owning, controlling, operating, or managing any telephone line for compensation within 'the state. Section 232 defines "telephone line" to include "all conduits, ducts, poles, wires, cables ... and. all other real estate, fixtures, and personal property owned, controlled, operated, or managed in connection with communication by telephone, where such communication is had with or without the use of transmission lines." Two key issues are raised by these statutes. First, what type of telecommunications providers will be considered telephone corporations? Second, what types of services constitute telephone service for the purpose of claiming an exemption from local franchise requirements? The California Public' Utilities Commission has interpreted the above definitions to include corporations that communicate information_by means' other than voice and that use either one-way or two-way transmissions. See, e.g., Industrial Communications Systems. Inc. v. Public Utilities Comm., 22 Cal.3d 572, 578 (1978). RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 20 Thus, each telecommunications provider proposing to use city streets must be separately evaluated. It should not be assumed that representations of a provider contending that compensation cannot be required for its proposed use of city property are necessarily correct. For example, Metricore has agreed to pay various cities a franchise fee for the use of city right-of-way under its proposed agreement, provided that similar providers are treated in the same manner. 2. Street Degradation Mitigation Fees Public works officials are concerned about the adverse effects that multiple paving cuts will have on the useful life of city streets, thereby resulting in increased maintenance and capital costs. Several cities are considering the adoption of a street degradation mitigation fee to be paid by any entity (not just telecommunications providers) that requests permission to excavate in a public street. The leaders in this effort have been San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. All of these cities have conducted studies to justify the methedology of the proposed fee. San Francisco is considering using a per square foot fee based upon a sliding scale ranging from $5 per square foot (for streets paved in the last 5 years), $4 per square foot (for streets paved in the last 6-10 years), and $3 per square foot (for streets paved in the last 11-15 years.) Los Angeles is also considering a per square foot fee based upon a sliding scale. The Anaheim City Council recently rejected an ordinance that would have established a street degradation fee. San Francisco is now drafting its proposed ordinance. Los Angeles has submitted a proposed ordinance to the City Council's Public Works Committee. Sacramento and San Diego are now conducting studies to support a proposed fee. The FCC, in a recent ruling In the Matter of Classic Telephone. Inc. CCBPol 96-10, addressed the type of regulations that a City may impose on telecommunications ' providers that use the public right-of-way. In this case, the FCC stated: "Section 253(c) preserves the authority of State and local governments.to manage the public rights-of-way, but requires such regulations to be both competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory ... The legislative history sheds light on permissible management functions under section 253(c). During Senate floor debate on section 253(c), Senator Feinstein offered examples of the types of restrictions that Congress,intended to permit under section 253(c), including State and local legal requirements that: (1) regulate the time or location of RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 21 excavation to preserve effective traffic flow, prevent hazardous road conditions, or minimize notice impacts; (2) require a company to place its facilities underground, rather than overhead, consistent with the requirements imposed on other utility companies; 3) require a company to pay fee.,s to recover an appropriate share of the increased repair and pavin~ costs that result from repeated excavation: (emphasis added); 4) enforce local zoning regulations; and 5) require a company to indemnify the City against any claims of injury arising from the company's excavation." A coalition of approximately 40 northern and southern California cities has been formed to discuss the issue of street degradation mitigation fees. George Alvarez, the City Engineer of Santa Aria, is curren~y the chairperson of this coalition. 3. City Actions Cities should consider the following: a. Carefully evaluate each request by a telecommunications provider to use the public right-of-way in order to determine if a franchise or other form of compensation may be required. b.. Adopt a street degradation mitigation fee after completing the necessary supporting study. c. Establish nondiscriminatory written policies for the use of cil~y streets by telecommunications providers. d. Study the best method for developing a telecommunicafions infrastructure (i.e., should it be left to the private sector, or should the City play a role in constructing and owning the system?) E. Comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance Many cities are now considering the adoption of a comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance in order to address various provisions of the 1996 Act and the implementing regulations of the FCC. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE IDES OF MARCH, 1997 Page 22 A comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance would presumably address various telecommunications services and facilities described above, and define the roles that a city may play in telecommunications,. such as the following: 1. As regulator. This role involves regulation of the public right-of-way, cable television franchises, antenna towers, open video systems, and satellite dishes. 2. As service l~rovider. This role involves the City's use of telecommunications, which may include a city's web site, an institutional network, access to the Intemet, and other telecommunication services that may be provided to a city' s residents. 3. As facilitator. This role is one of encouraging improved public and private telecommunication'services to be provided to a city's residents. It includes addressing a city's telecommunication infrastructure. A key issue here is whether a city should provide the infrastructure both for its own needs and for the telecommunications private' sector that would lease excess capacity in that publicly-owned infrastructure. Conclusion Most of the pwvisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that affect. cities. were. drafted in very general terms. Substantial rule-making authority was conferred upon the FCC to define more specifically how this comprehensive statute will be implemented. Thus, administrative and judicial interpretations of the 1996 Act, and of its ultimate impact on cities, will be an evolving process. City Attorneys who belong to CAALAC, the City Attorneys Department of the League, and other organizations may reasonably expect to be offered "Telecommunications Update" sessions for decades to come! ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~2'~-~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Coundl FROM: :~~erman Pa_rker, Director of Community Services DATE: June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc., for FY1999-00 PREPARED BY: ~r'Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Coundl: Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc., to reassign the odginal agreement between The City of Temecula and Excel Landscape, Inc., to the Temecula Community Services District. DISCUSSION: The re-assignment of the odginal agreement between the City of Temecula (City) and Excel Landscape, Inc., (Excel) to the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) is required to correct some technical concerns the City Attorney has with the present agreement. The odginal agreement was between the City and Excel, however all of the subsequent amendments (a total of six) are between the TCSD and Excel. In order to mitigate his concerns the City Attomey has structured the contract amendment before you to allow for this re-assignment of the odginal agreement to the TCSD. The reassignment will require the approval of both the City Coundl and the TCSD. The contract also contains other provisions to extend the agreement for an additional two-year term and allow for the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance contract areas that will come on line during the remaining term of the agreement. This would require the approval by the Board of Directors upon their acceptance of the re-assignment. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Amendment Original Agreement Six (6) subsequent Amendments R:/HARRINGK~AGENDA.RP'DEXCELEXTENDgg-00.TCSD AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 22, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), Temecula Community Services District ("District") and Excel Landscape, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which the parties agree are true and correct: a. On June 24, 1997, the City and Contractor, for the benefit of the District, entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights -of-way. b. The original Agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1998, and March 22, 1999, April 5, 1999, and April 15, 1999 in order to add areas to the Contractor' s Scope of Work. The June 24, 1997 Agreement, as amended, shall be referred to as the "Agreement." c. Section 9, of the Agreement provides for a contract term of 24 months which would expire on June 24, 1999 and a provision for two one year extensions of the term of the agreement. d. It is the desire of the parties to extend the term of this Agreement for an additional period of two (2) years with a modified contract price and provisions to add new parks and landscaped areas to the Scope of Work. as follows: Section 2. of the Agreement, Scope of Work, is hereby amended to read "2. SCOPE OF WORK "A. Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with the "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the areas described in the RFP and specifically designated on Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B. A number of additional areas within the City will require landscape maintenance services upon the completion of certain facilities during the term of this Agreement, which areas described on Exhibit B, Supplement Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMN~Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc as follows: reference. Upon the effective date of any Change Order pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement authorizing Contractor to provide landscape maintenance services for one or more of the areas described on Exhibit B, Contractor shall perform everything required to.be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with the "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the designated areas." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement, Change Orders, is hereby amended to read follows: "3. CHANGE ORDERS "The City Manager is hereby authorized to approve Change Orders which: (1) authorize the Contractor to_ proceed with landscape maintenance services for one or more of the SupplemenY Contract Areas designated in Exhibit B at the prices set forth in Exhibit B; or (2) modify the scope of work for a Contract Area, a Supplemental Contract Area or the General Landscape Maintenance Specifications so long as the cumulative total costs of all such modifications under this subsection (2) does not increase the total annual cost of the services provided under this Agreement by more than ten percent (10 %). All other Change Orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors." 4. Section 4 of the Agreement, Payments, is hereby amended to read as follows: "4. COMPENSATION; PAYMENTS "The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually performed in accordance with the price schedules set forth in Exhibits A and B. Contractor shall submit monthly invoices to the City specifying the work accomplished during the period covered (ie., fertilization, pest control, etc. ). The City shall review the invoices submitted by Contractor to determine whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made within thirty-five (35) days following receipt of the invoice or City shall provide Contractor with a written statement objecting to the invoice and specifying the objections. Monthly invoices shall be sent to the City's Finance Department at the address specified in Section 25." 5. Section 9 of the Agreement, Term, is hereby amended to read as "9. TERM A, The Amendment shall remain in full force and effect until June 30, 2001. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause, on thirty (30) days written notice to the other party." R:XHARRINGKXAGREEMNTXExcel Landscape 6.99 Ame~. 7.doc 6. The Section 19, Insurance, of Section 1, Instruction and Information, of the Request for Proposal dated May 21, 1997 and incorporated into the Agreement pursuant to Section 1. of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows: "19. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. "b . Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than: (1) General Liability: two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. "c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, District and, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. "d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT',Exce! Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe 7. Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this Seventh Amendment, is hereby substituted in place of all Exhibits to the Agreement and the Amendments to the Agreement, including Exhibits 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 5A, and 6. 8. Exhibit B, Supplemental Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this Seventh Amendment, is hereby added to the Agreement. 9. City hereby assigns the Agreement to the District, which assignment is accepted by the District. City hereby ratifies the acts of the District taken pursuant to Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. 10. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. //// IIII R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMN'BExcel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Steven J. Ford Mayor TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Jeff Comerchero President Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney/District Counsel EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC., a California Corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe EXHIBIT A Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas (Amended as of June 8, 1999) NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # Site Name P-1 Veterans Park P-2 Sam Hicks Monument Park P-3 Calle Aragon Park P-4 Bahia Vista Park P-5 Loma Linda Park P-6 Riverton Park P-7 John Magee Park P-9 Voorburg Park P-10 Nicolas Road Park P-11 Butterfield Stage Park P-12 Temecula Duck Pond P-13 Rotary Park P-14 Nakayama Park P-15 Winchester Creek Park Monthly Price $1,550.00 800.00 250.00 250.00 707.00 1,617.00 310.00 303.00 812.00 782.00 2,155.00 300.00 125.00 1,568.00 Annual Price $18,600.00 9,600.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 8,484.00 19,404.00 3,720.00 3,636.00 9,744.00 9,384.00 25,860.00 3,600.00 1,500.00 18,816.00 TOTAL $ 11,529.00 $138,348.00 R:\HARRINGK~,AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc STREETSCAPE SERVICE AREA Site # SS-1 Site Name Via Eduardo Streetscape Monthly Price $106.00 Annual Price $1,272.00 TOTAL $ 106.00 $ 1,272.00 R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT\ExceI Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 (P-8) SP-5 Site Name Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park Pala Community Park Kent Hintergardt Park Margarita Community Park Monthly Price $9,294.00 3,592.00 2,333.00 3,359.00 3,147.00 Annual Price $111,528.00 43,104.00 27,996.00 40,308.00 37,764.00 TOTAL $ 21,725.00 $ 260,700.00 R:\HAR. RINGK~GREEMNT~Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.do{: MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site # M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 Site Name Rancho California Road Median Ynez Road Median Butterfield Stage Road Median Margarita Road Median Margarita Road Median at 79 South Monthly Price $400.00 500.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 Annual Price $4,800.00 6,000.00 1,800.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 TOTAL $ 1,250.00 $15,000.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT~Excel Landscape 6.99 Amend. 7.doc COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA Site # F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 (SS-2) Site Name Community Recreation Center Senior Center City Hall/Maintenance Facility Temecula Community Center Fire Station #84 Old Town Parking Lot A Old Town Streetscape TOTAL Monthly Price $1,444.00 361.00 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 $ 4,176.00 AnnuaiPrice $17,328.00 4,332.00 6,492.00 2,316.00 4,800.00 3,000.00 11,844.00 $ 50,112.00 R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNTXExcel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc SLOPE SERVICE AREA (SOUTH) Site # S-3a S-3b S-4 S-8 S-12 S-13 S-16 Site Name Rancho Highlands Rancho Highlands - Ynez Road Slope The Vineyards The Villages A and B Vintage Hills Presley (Viranda, Country Glen, Bridlevale) Tradewinds "' Monthly Price $515.00 1,000.00 255.00 4,734.00 4,600.00 1,408.00 863.00 Annual Price $6,180.00 12,000.00 3,060.00 56,808.00 55,200.00 16,896.00 10,356.00 TOTAL $ 13,375.00 $ 160,500.00 R:\HARRINGK~.GREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7,doc SLOPE SERVICE AREA (NORTH) Site # Site Name S-1 SaddlewoodlPavillion Point S-2 Winchester Creek I and II S-5 Signet Series S-6 Woodcrest Country S-7 Ridgeview S-9 Rancho Solana S-10 Martinique S-11 Meadowview Estates S-14 Mirada S-15 Barclay Estates S-17 Monte Vista Monthly Price $2,372.00 1,202.00 2,534.00 559.00 773.00 130.00 355.00 150.00 394.00 344.00 565.00 Annual Price $28,464.00 14,424.00 30,408.00 6,708.00 9,276.00 1,560.00 4,260.00 1,800.00 4,728.00 4,128.00 6,780.00 TOTAL $ 9,378.00 $112,536.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-.~) Amend. 7.doc Site # Mo6 M-7 M-8 M-9 M-10 M-11 M-12 M-13 M-14 EXHIBIT B Supplement Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas (Amended as of June 8, 1999) MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site Name Margarita Road Median at Solana Ridge Margarita Road Median at Tuscany Ridge Margarita Road Median at Win~'hester Road Margarita Road Median at Promenade Mall Margarita Road Median at T-28650 Winchester Road Median at Jefferson Rancho California Road Median at Portafino Paseo Del Sol Median Islands Solana Way Median Islands Monthly Price $50.00 100.00 50.00 300.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 500.00 75.00 TOTAL $ 1,350.00 Annual Price $600.00 1,200.00 600.00 3,600.00 900.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 6,000.00 900.00 16,200.00 R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT\ExcoI Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc SPORTS PARK SERVICE AREAS Site # SP-6 Site Name Temeku Hills Sports Park Monthly Price $3,600.00 Annual Price $43,200.00 TOTAL $ $3,600.00 $ 43,200.00 R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT\Exccl Landscape 6-99 AmeN. 7.doe COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA Site # F-8 F-9 Site Name Temecula Valley Museum Old Town Parking Lot B Monthly Price $285.00 250.00 Annual Pdce $3,420.00 3,000.00 TOTAL $ 535.00 $ 6,420.00 R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered into this 241h day of June 1997. By and Between City ofTemecula, a Municipal corporation hereina~er referred to as "CITY" and Excel Landscape. Inc. a California Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR" RECITALS WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain the services of a landscape maintenance Contractor to perform landscape maintenance within the CITY's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. WHEREAS, Contractor is a firm that possesses the necessary equipment, licenses, insurance, and personnel to provide such services; and WHEREAS, CITY's Council has authorized execution of this AGREEMENT to retain the services of Contractor. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that CITY does hereby retain Contractor to provide landscape maintenance under the following terms: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The complete Contract includes the following documents: I) RFP and 2) General Landscape Specifications. When the Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. 2. SCOPF. OF WORK r',Jkaf~k~yb%aggr, d~ht97-8, rf~ CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,_ and all utility and transportation services in accordance with "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for slopes (north) and neighborhood parks as described in the RFP. 3. CHANGE ORDERS All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manger is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 4. PAYMENTS The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually performed in accordance with the pricing sheets attached hereto as Exhibits I and 2, and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Included with monthly billing will be the work functions accomplished during that period, (i.e., fertilization, pest control, etc.). The City shall review the invoices submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made thirty-five (35) days following submittal of the invoice, or City shall provide the Contractor with a written statement objecting to the invoice. Monthly invoices shall be sent City of Temecula Finance Department 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: NONPERFORMANCE Ao Contractor may be assessed penalties by City up to one hundred percent (100%) of the monthly value of a site for nonperformance and up to sixty percent (60%) of the monthly value of a site for substandard performance. Such penalties shall be assessed at the discretion of the City. Contractor shall be notified of any penalties in accordance with the terms of this Contract. The Contract may be terminated by City for failure of Contractor to satisfactorily perform any corrective action after being notified of service failure on more than seven(7) occasions during the base term of the Contract. C, Contractor shall be notified of service failure by delivery of a "Performance Deficiency Notification" form to Contractor by City. Said notice will serve as formal notification that Contractor has incurred a service r~Kk;yb~nd~uUrd~7-~.rfp deficiency sufficiently material that contract termination may result if satisfactory corrective action is not taken by Contractor. D, The Performance Deficiency Notification will contain the acceptable time period for service correction. Upon Deficiency Notification, the correction will either be accepted or rejected. If accepted, part or all of the penalties may be waived, regardless of whether City has incurred loss as a result of said service failure. Contractor will be notified of correction acceptance status by delivery of a Performance Deficiency Status Memorandum. Should correction not be accepted, a separate additional Performance Deficiency Notification will be delivered to Contractor, thus increasing the number of Deficiency Notices received by Contractor. If Contractor should neglect or refuse or fail for any reason to perform the work, the City may terminate the Contract for nonperformance with five (5) days written notice to Contractor. E, In case of termination by the City for nonperformance, the City may contract or cause to be done any work not completed at the time of the termination, and the Contractor shall pay for such work. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making each request for payment, Contractor shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract; the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall execute an affidavit and release with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAII,ING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 oftheLabor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 8. LIABILITY rNSURANCE CONTRACTOR, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies: "I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 9. TERM A, The Contract shall remain in full force and effect for a period of 24 months from the date of written notice to proceed, unless terminated by either party. B, City reserves the right to_exercise its option to extend this Agreement for two one- year extensions within ninety (90) days prior to its expiration. Contract price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each calendar year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles-Anaheim- Riverside Area published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (CPI). Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause within thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this COntract. All time requirements stated herein shall be satisfied. 11. INDEMNIFICATION All work covered by this Contract done at the work site or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly Or indirectly out of the 9bligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. 12. CONTRACTOR'S INDF-PENDENT 1NVFSTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions or difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 13. GRATUITIES CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it~or any of its employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other provider of Specifications. Contractor further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT Simultaneously with submitting each monthly invoice, Contractor shall file with the City his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all sub-contractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. SIGNATURE OF Contractor Corporations The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's office. Pannerships The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The proposal must be signed by all panners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of a certified copy of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner is presented to the City CIerk, in which case the general partner may sign. Joint Ventures Proposals submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer. Individuals Proposals 'submitted by individuals must be signed by the Contractor, unless an up-to-date power of attorney is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case said person may sign for the individual. The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition, however, where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature. 17. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 18. BOOKS AND RECORDS CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 19. UTII .ITY LOCATION CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 20. RF. GIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4216.2. 21. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan for worker protection during the excavation of trenches required by the scope of the work in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705. A, CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as soon as Contractor, or any of Contractor's sub-contractors, agents, or employees have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following conditions: r~hm~byb%a~r, nd~-d~7-8.rfp The presence of any material that the Contractor believes is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code: Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated in the specifications; or Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract. Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken, Contractor shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the hazardous waste or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person. C, CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in the exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, then CITY shall issue a change order. In the event of a dispute between CITY and Contractor as to whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or part of the work, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date, and shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract. Contractor shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. 22. INSPECTION The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by authorized CITY personnel. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time at~er completion of the work. 23. DISCRIMINATION CON'Ilt~CTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 24. GOVERNING LAW This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. Venue shall be the County of Riverside. In the event litigation is commenced by either party with respect to this contract, the prevailing party in such litigation, as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney t~es. 25. V~,ITTEN NOTICE Any written notice required to be given in any part of ~he Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties h~eto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: reek, City Clerk EXHIBIT 1 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 PoI0 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 Site Name Monthly Price Veterans Park $1,550.00 Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00 Calle Aragon Park $ 250.00 Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00 Loma Linda Park $ 707.00 Rivenon Park $1,617.00 John Magee Park $ 310.00 Voorburg Park $ Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00 Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00 Temecula Duck Pond $1.1 ~5.00 Rotary Park $ ~30.00 Nakayama Park $ 125.00 Annual Price ~8,600.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 8,484.00 $1_9,4o4.oo $ 3,720.00 $ $ 9,744.00 $ 9,384.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 1,500.00 TOTAL $8,961.00 $107,532.00 EXHIBIT 2 City of Tcmccula R. equest for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SLOPE SERVICE AREA (NORTH) Site # S-I S-2 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-9 S-IO S-11 S-14 S-15 Site Name Saddlewood/Paviilion Point Winchester Creek I and II Signet Series Woodcrest Country Ridgeview Rancho Solana Martinique Meadowview Estates Mirada Barclay Estates Monthly Price S $ 1,9fl2,00 $ 2,534.00 $ 559.OO $ 773.0O $ 355.OO $ 150.O0 $ 394.00 $ 344.O0 Annual Price $ ~,af, a O0 $ 14,dP4,C~ $ 3(],401~.O0 $ 6.708.00 $ 9,276.00 $ q ,560.00 S 4.260.00 $ 1,800,00 S 4,77A.(]0 $ 4.]m.00 TOTAL $ 8.811.00 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1# 1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Fxcel Landscape. Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: purposes: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an agreement for landscape maintenance services within the CITY's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, _parks and rights-of-way. ("Agreement"). Amendment. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this 2. Exhibit 1 to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 1A is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BY: Ronaid E. Bradley, City r ATTEST: BY: ~o~ Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: ~Pe r M. Thorson, City Attorney te CONTRACTOR Fxcel Landscape. Inc. TITLE: ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT 1A City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 SS-1 Site Name Veterans Park ~' Sam Hicks Monument Park Calle Aragon Park Bahia Vista Park Loma Linda Park Riverton Park John Magee Park Voorburg Park Nicolas Road Park Butterfield Stage Park Temecula Duck Pond Rotary Park Nakayama Park Via Eduardo Streetscape Monthly Price Annual Price 1,550.00 $ 18.600.00 800.00 9.600.00 250.00 3.000.00 250.00 3.000.00 707.00 8.484.00 1,617.00 19.404.00 310.00 3.770.00 303.00 3.636.00 812.00 9.744.00 789.00 9.384,00 1.155.00 13.860.00 300.00 3.600.00 175.00 1,500.00 106.00 1.272.00 TOTAL $9.067.00 $108.804.00 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: DATE: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services July 14, 1998 SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1998-99 PREPARED BY: Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Approve contract amendment of $1,272 with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for the Via Eduardo Street Scape (SS-1) for FY1998- 99. Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $214,560 to cover FY1998-99 contract with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for neighborhood parks/streetscapes and slopes (north). BACKGROUND: On June 24, 1997, the Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors awarded a two year (24 month) contract to Excel Landscape Maintenance, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for FY1997-98 and FY1998-99. Funds were authorized for expenditure at that time for the contract period FY1997-98. The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) recommends adding the maintenance of the Via Eduardo Streetscape to the landscape maintenance contract with Excel Landscape Inc. This area (approximately 17,000 square feet) is located on Via Eduardo at Pala Road. This area was previously unimproved public right-of-way which has recently been landscaped and irrigated and now needs to be maintained. The new annual cost for neighborhood parks/street scape is $108,804 with the balance of $105,756 for slopes for a total annual contract amount for all services is $214,560. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Excel Landscape, Inc., for FY1998- 99, including the additional maintenance area, is $214,560. Sufficient funds are available in the TCSD Annual Operating Budget for FY1998-99 in accounts 190-180-999-5415, 190-199- 999-5415 and 193-180-999-5415. R:~'ringk~agenda.rpt\excc198 MINUTE ACTION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DATE: July 15, 1998 TO: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services MEETING OF: July 14, 1998 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: CSD Item No.6 SUBJECT: land.~cape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1998- 99 The motion was made by Directc~ Lindemans, seconded by Director Roberrs to approve staff recommendation. 6.1 Approve contract amendmere of $1,272 with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for the Via Eduardo Street Scape (SS-1) for FY 1998-99; 6.2 Authorize the expenditure of funds in the mount of $214,560 to cover FY 1998-99 contract with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for neighborhood parks/streerscapes and slopes (north). The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temeeula, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, the foregoing to be the official action taken by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the above meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th day of July, 1998. /~ye~l [SEAL] AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 11, 1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants 'and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. ("Agreement"). B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Exhibits 3, 4, 5, and 6 to the Agreement are hereby added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement will be terminated effective July 1, 1999. I~ : ~ U S E P t C ON'rJ~ C"'FHt.,tD EX CEL W~ D IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tile parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape J Alfaro Temecuia Community Services District Attest: ~Wr~J°ne~C Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R:IRUSEPtCONTI~C'FL4MDEXCEL WPD ATTACHMENT A R :tR US E P ~ C O NTP,.A CTtA MD ~ C FL WP D Site # S-3a S-3b S-4 S-8 S-12 S-13 S-16 EXHIBIT 3 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SLOPE SERVICE AREA (SOUTH) Site Name Rancho Highlands Rancho Highlands-Ynez Road Slope The Vineyards The Villages A & B Vintage Hills Presley (Viranda, Country Glen/ 79 South, Bridlevale) Tradewinds Monthly Price Annual Price $ 515.00 $ 6.180.00 1 .O00.00 1 ~.O00.00 755'.00 3.060.00 4.734.00 56,808.00 4.600.00 55. :200.00 1.408.00 16.896.00 863.00 10.356.00 TOTAL $13.375.00 ,~160.500.00 orlzeYd~Sig~t ~ure R .. tR U,SEPX CONTRA C'['~-I MDF. XCI.'L WPD EXHIBIT 4 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance M-3 M-4 MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site Name Rancho California Road Median Ynez Road Median =- Butterfield Stage Road Median Marganta Road Median Monthly Price $ 500.00 $ l~.O0 s lo3,oo Annual Price S 4,fill.00 $ 6,000.00 $1,800.00 S 1.7~10.00 TOTAL 67 EXHIBIT 5 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 P-8 (SP-4) Site Name Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park _- Pala Commumty Park Kent H. intergardt Park Monthly Price $ 9,294.00 $ 3,592.00 $ 2.333.00 $ 3.359.00 Annual Price $lll ,528.00 S 4t,l~4_Cfi S 27,996.O3 TOTAL $18,578.00 hotureu 68 EXHIBIT 6 City of Temecula Kequest for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA Site # F-I F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 Site Name Community Recreation Center Senior Center City Hall/Maintenance Facility Temecula Commumty Center Fire Station #84 Old Town Parking Lot Monthly Price $1,444.00 $ 361.00 $ 541.00 s ].93.00 $ ~=~0.00 S 250.00 Atmual Price 17,328.00 4,332.00 6,492.00 2.316.00 3.000.00 TOTAL 3,369.00 69 hatur'c/E'( 190-182-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 340-199-701-5414 ATTACHMENTS: Amendment Letter of Resignation from California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. MINUTE ACTION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY' OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DATE: July 29, 1998 TO: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services MEETING OF: July 28, 1998 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: CSD Item No.3 SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape for FY1998-99 The motion was made by DirectOr Robens, seconded by Director Ford to approve staff recommendation. 3.1 Approve a contract amendment in the amount of $389,157 with Excel Landscape to provide landscape maintenance services for additional landscaped areas for FY1998-99. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Lindemans STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) L Susan W. Jones, Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, the foregoing to be the official action taken by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the above meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of July, 1998. [SEAL] AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as o: January 1 I, 1999 by and between the Temecula_Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way ("Agreement"). B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 1A to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 1 B is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Jo~e./A!faro Of Nner ' Te~~y Services District Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager Attest: 1Jones, Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A' EXHIBIT 1B (As amended January 11, 1999) City of Temecuia Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOnD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-IO P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 SS-1 Site Name Monthly Price Veterans Park $ 1,550.00 Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00 Calle Aragon Park $ 250.00 Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00 Loma Linda Park $ 707.00 Riverton Park $ 1,617.00 John Magee Park $ 310.00 Voorburg Park $ 303.00 Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00 Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00 Temecula Duck Pond $ 1,155.00 Rotary Park $ 300.00 Nakayama Park $ 125.00 Winchester Creek Park ~ 1,568.00 Via Eduardo Streetscape $ 106.00 Annual Price $18.600.00 $ 9,600.00 ~ 3.000.00 $ 3,000.00 ~ 8.484.00 $19.404.00 $ 3,720.00 $ 3.636.00 $ 9,744.00 $ 9.384.00 $13,860.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 1,500.00 ~ 18.816.00 $ 1,272.00 TOTAL 10,635.00 9127,620.00 Authorized Signature AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 22, 1999 by and between the Temecula.,Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, and January 11, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the Agreement. B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 4 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 4A will be added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full· The cost for this new site will be $100.00 per month· Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. R:LEIARRINGKtAGENDA,RP~EXCEL AMENDMENT 4,4 FY 98-99. DOC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape J I her Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R:W,~RRJNGKL, IGEND,4.RPTiF_.XCEL ,.B'fF..NDMENT 4..4 FY 98-99.DOC ATTACHMENT "A" R:~HtlRRINGKL,IGL:ND..I.RPT~F_.,YCEL ,~I/vI~'NDMENT 4.~ FY 98-99.DOC E,V,J=U/iIT 4A (As amended March 22, 1999) City of Temecula PHcing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site # M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 *M-5 Site Name ..- Monthly Price Rancho California Road Median $ 400.00 Ynez Road Median $ 500.00 Butterfield Stage Road Median $ 150.00 Margarita Road Median $ 100.00 Margarita Road Median at 79 South $ 100.00 Annual Price $ 4,800.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 * New Site TOTAL $1,250.00 915,000.00 ~Sig ture~ R:IttARPJNGKIAG_FNDA.RP~F_..XCL;'L tU~,IENDME'NT ~IA FY 98-99. DOC AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 5, 1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999 and March 22, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the Agreement. B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 1 B to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 1 C is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Teme I .:~ty Services District ~elson, Acting City Manager Attest: Susan W. City C/erk JoneS, CMC Approved as to form: Pet~ City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A" AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 15, 1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999, March 22, 1999 and April 1, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the Agreement. B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 5 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 5A will be added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Attest: ~~~- k. ,'~ Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk :::~o~-.~ Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT ~A (As amended April 15, 1999) City of Temecula Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 (P-8) *SP-5 Site Name _, Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park Pala Community Park Kent Hintergardt Park Margarita Community Park Monthly Price Annual Price 9,294.00 $111,528.00 3,592.00 $ 43,104.00 2,333.00 $ 27,996.00 3,359.00 $ 40,308.00 3,147.00 $ 37,764.00 * New Site TOTAL 21,725.00 $260,700.00 ITEM 10 APPROVA~/.~C, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager DATE: June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Contract Extension for the Professional Services Agreement to Prepare the Southside Specific Plan Prepared By: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Approve Contract Amendment Number 1 with RBF extending the performance pedod to June 30, 2000. BACKGROUND: In 1997 the City of Temecula entered into an agreement with Urban Design Studio (now part of RBF) to prepare a specific plan for the Front Street corridor south of Old Town. Work commenced on this project in the summer of 1997 and continued into the spdng of 1998. At that time, the City staff person responsible for the project left the City. The subsequent heavy workload in both Current and Long Range Planning programs left staff dealing with higher pdodty projects which resulted in the Southside Specific Plan not receiving the attention necessary to meet the contract timeline. This proposed extension would allow sufficient time for staff and the consultant to finalize the proposed Specific Plan and take it through the public headng process. A copy of the Extension Agreement is included as Attachment No. 1. FISCALIMPACT: There is currently an existing contract and purchase order in effect for this project in the amount of $61,700. No additional funds are being requested for this project. Attachments: Professional Services Agreement Extension between the City of Temecula and Urban Design Studio (now a part of RBF) - Page 2 R:XI-IO GAHD\southsido sp exterudon staff r~port-cc .doc 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXTENSION BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND RBF ~\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\HOGAND~southsido sp extension staff report-cc.doc 2 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT NO. 97-83 The Agreement dated June 10, 1997 between the City of Temecula and RBF, a successor in interest to Urban Design Studio, (heroin referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Section 1. The Term of this Agreement is extended to June 30, 2000. Section 2. All other Terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, without diminishment, alteration or modification, except as se~ forth in Section 1 herein. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Date and Year shown below: CONSULTANT By: By: CITY OF TEMECULA Steven J. Ford, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey ATI'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:~hogand\southside ap extension staff repo~*cc.doc ITEM 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City ManagedCity Council ~Villiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22,1999 Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW95-12 - Reduction in Retention Withheld from Contractor PREPARED BY: Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer Julie Dauer, CIP Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a reduction in the retention amount held from Riverside Construction Company from ten percent (10%) to five percent (5%) for the Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW95-12. BACKGROUND: On October 28, 1997, a contract was awarded to Riverside Construction Company for the construction of the Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvement, Project No. PW95-12. During the construction period Riverside Construction Company submitted monthly progress payment applications equal to 90 percent of the value of work completed in accordance with the contract documents. A retention of 10 percent is therefore withheld from the general contractor's progress payments to provide an amount of money that can be available to satisfy lien claims from subcontractors or suppliers and as a means of holding funds that may be utilized to complete the project in case of default. However, Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, allows for a reduction in the retention to 5% if the agency deems that progress has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. Since Riverside Construction Company has now completed well over 50% of the project, they are requesting a reduction in the retention amount being withheld to 5%. A reduction at this point in the project would mean a release of half the funds now being held as retention, which would leave a balance of $241,149.81. We have reviewed the progress of the work and have found it to be satisfactory for the purposes of reducing the retention and that 5% will be adequate to address potential claims or default and recommend that Riverside's request be granted. r:~agdrpt\99\O622\PW95-12ret/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: The City has retained $482,299.61 from progress payments submitted to date. A reduction to 5 percent will result in releasing $241,149.81 to Riverside Construction Company. A 5 percent retention will also be held from any future progress payments. At the end of the project all retention being held by the City will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Request from Riverside Construction Company r:~agdrpt\99~622~PW95-12ret/ajp i909) 682-8308 CALIF. STATE (909) 682-8350 (FAX) LICENSE NO, 266222 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 111 NO. MAIN STREET -- P. O. BOX 1146 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502-1148 Ma3, 18.1999 ~,~" Steve a ......:..t. C it>. of Temecula Public Works P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Rancho Cal ifi.}rnia Rd. - remecula Contract No. PW 95-12 Dear Mr. Beswick- Respectt~lly. we hereby request that the retention held on this job be reduced 50% to a figure o,~' 5% on the c::,ntract. We make our request in accordance witl': the contract documents [Public Contract Code] and the fhct that our progress has been satisfactory and is nearlv complete. We ask that you have the proper authorities present our request on our behalf at the ver? next City Council meeting. Sincerely. _--.~/:, ,~ //,. Julie Greenhaw Accounting Manager ITEM 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council /~.,~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22,1999 SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 28962 located north of Santiago Road, south of Estero Road and east of Ormsby Road PREPARED BY: onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works RECOMMENDAT cel Map No. 28962 in conformance with the approved Conditions of Approval BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 28962 was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Manager, Debbie Ubnoske, on October 28, 1998 and expiration date being October 28, 2000. The Developer, Pacific Capital Investments, Ltd., has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Parcel Map No. 28962 is a two (2) parcel residential subdivision, of 2.51 gross acres, located north of Santiago Road, south of Estero Road and east of Ormsby Road. This site is currently vacant. The Developer has completed all its offsite requirements and has placed all its required monuments per the Parcel Map. The Department of Public Works has accepted the offsite improvements and monument placement therefore the Developer is not required to place securities for improvements. The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 28962: Public Facilities Development Impact Fee is due prior to issuance of a building permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 28962 r:~agdrpt\99\0622~tr28962.map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST PARCEL MAP NO. 28962 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Public Facilities Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit r:~agdrpt~99\0622\tr28962.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 28962 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE DATE: June 22, 1999 MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Water $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Sewer $ 0.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 0.00 $ 0.00 SECURITY $ 0.00 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined. $ 0.00 $ PAID $ TBD* $ 56.00 $ 4.00 $ 790.00 $ 250.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 0.00 r:~agdrpt~g~)622~tr28962.map TO ~N~ COUNTteY TO MUteYel~=rA TO A~~ TO SAN DIEGO ~ClNITY MAP ne eo ~ / ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 23143-2, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road PREPARED BY: ~onald J. Parks Deputy Director of Public Works lement M. Jim~nez, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve: 1. Tract Map No. 23143-2 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-2 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended three times. The Second Extension of Time was approved on July 16, 1992 by the Planning Director. The Third Extension of Time was approved September 17, 1998 by the Planning Director, expiration date being August 16, 1999. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Tract Map No. 23143-2 is a sixty-four (64) lot single family residential subdivision with eight open space lots. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Bufferfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped. Crowne Hill Ddve runs through Tract Map No. 23143-2, Tract Map No. 23143-3, and Tract Map No. 23143-4. A separate bond for the construction of Crowne Hill Drive in the amount of $599,826 has been posted as security for street improvements and will not be released until all improvements have been constructed. Improvements to Crowne Hill Ddve are an Acquisition Project as part of Assessment District No. 159. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-2: Development Impact Fee due pdor to issuance of a building permit. r:~agdrptLqg~0622~tr23143-2.rnap FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Fee Checklist 2. Fees & Securities Report 3. Project Vicinity Map 4. Tract Map No. 23143-2 r:~agdrpt%99~0622W23143-2.rnap CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TM 23143-2 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit r:%agdrpt%99%0622V. r23143-2.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 23143-2 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 637,500 Water $ 132,500 Sewer $ 174,500 TOTAL $ 944,500 DATE: June 22, 1999 MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY SECURITY $ $ $ $ 318,750 66,250 87,250 472,250 $ 15,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Stdping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined. $ 0.00 $ N/A $ TBD* $ 173.00 $ 8.00 $ 2,190.00 $ 750.00 $ 3,121.00 $ 0.00 r:~gdrptLq9~"22%tr23143-2.map TRACT 23143- VICINITY MAP NO T .TO SCALE I .~',~r I I ~ I I I I / ITEM 14 - CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council /'~,~(William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 23143-3, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road PREPARED BY: Ronald J Parks Deputy Director of Public Works lement ~. Jim;~nez, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve: 1. Tract Map No. 23143-3 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-3 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended three times. The Second Extension of Time was approved on July 16, 1992 by the Planning Director. The Third Extension of Time was approved September 17, 1998 by the Planning Director, expiration date being August 16, 1999. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Final Tract Map No. 23143-3 is a one hundred five (105) lot single family residential subdivision with nine open space lots. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped. Crowne Hill Ddve runs through Tract Map No. 23143-2, Tract Map No. 23143-3, and Tract Map No. 23143-4. A separate bond for the construction of Crowne Hill Drive in the amount of $599,826 has been posted as security for street improvements and will not be released until all improvements have been constructed. Improvements to Crowne Hill Drive are an Acquisition Project as part of Assessment District No. 159. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-3: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit. r:~agclrpt%gO%0622VJ~23143-3 .map FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Fee Checklist 2. Fees & Securities Report 3. Project Vicinity Map 4. Tract Map No. 23143-3 r:~agdrpt~99~0622~tr23143-3.map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TM 23143-3 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit r:%agdrpt'~99',0622~tr23143-3,map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 23143-3 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 717,000 Water $ 175,500 Sewer $ 239,000 TOTAL $ 1,131,150 DATE: June 22, 1999 MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY SECURITY $ $ $ $ 358,500 - 87,750 - 119,500 - 565,750 $ 21,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Stdping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined. $ 0.00 $ N/A $ TBD* $ 215.00 $ 8.00 $ 3,030.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 4,303.00 $ 0.00 r:~agdrpt~99~0622~r23143-3.map , TRACT 23143 3 W'CINITY.. MAP SITE NO T ...TO SCALE ,/ $H(ET 7 OF 7 SHEETS DATA TABLE ENGINEER'S NOTES EASEMENT NOTES 2. I'~T PCW'rK)N S~OWN AS A °I~MANO~ ~ CGqT~UOUS Oaee[RSH~ AT I~[ T~ OF 78 ITEM 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City ManagedCity Council /}~/.~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 23143-4, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road PREPARED BY: ~ onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works lement M. Jimenez, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve: 1. Tract Map No. 23143-4 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-4 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended three times. The Second Extension of Time was approved on July 16, 1992 by the Planning Director. The Third Extension of Time was approved September 17, 1998 by the Planning Director, expiration date being August 16, 1999. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Final Tract Map No. 23143-4 is an eighty (80) lot single family residential subdivision with seven open spaca lots. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped. Crowne Hill Drive runs through Tract Map No. 23143-2, Tract Map No. 23143-3, and Tract Map No. 23143-4. A separate bond for the construction of Crowne Hill Ddve in the amount of $599,826 has been posted as security for street improvements and will not be released until all improvements have been constructed. Improvements to Crowne Hill Drive are an Acquisition Project as part of Assessment District No. 159. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-4: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit. r:~gclrp{Lqg~0622~r23143-4.map FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Tract Map No. 23143-4 r:~.gdrpt%99~0622~tr23143--4.map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TM 231434 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit r:~agdrl~gg~"22~r23143-4.rnap CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 23143-4 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 884,500 Water $ 218,000 Sewer $ 236,500 TOTAL $ 1,339,000 DATE: June 22, 1999 MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY SECURITY $ 442,250 $ 109,000 $ 118,250 $ 669,500 $ 23,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Stdping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined. $ 0.00 $ N/A $ TBD* $ 188.00 $ 8.00 $ 2,490.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 3,836.00 $ 0.00 4 r:~agclrptLqg~0622~23143-4.map TR ACT 23143 4 VICINITY MAP NiP T TO SCALE'.' .. : , . .. :; , · : I:.., ' ~ ~ .~ . ~ ~ ! ~ . ,:- ~ . . . . ... :. .. :.. :: '..:'~ .:..~ ~' .... ,:.~' .. ~j." ..." ::. ~" ':" · '.. "" .'. '}." .' '.'" i. ;.' L..' ...... ~. °m II !:.-...',. · ,.6,', .-'.,.:.',. .;. -:.;~- · ......, ..: · , L- ..., .... ~..,-:--:~,~ .~" '.' ";~?.,;, '.,2,',.~, ..... <": ,":":¢~'72'.'.'i , ,.' ' . - .?,.. .-... ..- ;~,~;.,.~. ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ,/~Jj~,william G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22, 1999 Summarily Vacate Portion of Public Streets in Parcel Map No. (Northeast corner of Solana Way at Margadta Road) 20278 BY'~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director PREPARED ~Y,L, Ibert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING PORTIONS OF SOLANA WAY AND MARGARITA ROAD IN PARCEL MAP NO. 20278. BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 3334 on July 6, 1965, including acceptance of offers of dedication for street purposes, said offers including Solana Way (formerly La Serena Way) and Margarita Road (formerly North General Kearny Road) along the frontage of Lot 38 of said tract. Said Lot 38 was then resubdivided as Parcel Map No. 20278, approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner on behalf of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and offers of dedication to public use for street and public utility purposes accepted at map approval date of February 20, 1985. The developer of the Solana Ridge Development, A.J. Spanos, has requested the vacation of certain portions of the fronting streets as the right of way widths required at the time of the original subdivisions have since been reduced by the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element from 11 O-feet width to 88-feet width. This results in a reduction in half-street width of 11-feet along the Solana Way frontage. The effect of the reduction proposed in this request for street vacation does not reduce the Margarita Road right of way width. The improved width along both frontages meets City improvement standards. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACH M E N TS: 1. Resolution No. 99- 2, Location Map with Exhibits "A" and "B" R:~agdrpt~99~0622\vacsolanawy 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING PORTIONS OF SOLANA WAY AND MARGARITA ROAD IN PARCEL MAP NO. 20278. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare as follows: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and (a) That the City Council intends to summarily vacate portions of Lots "D" and "E" (Solana Way ) and a portion of Lot "C" (Margarita Road) as these areas are described on Exhibits "A" and "B", in Parcel Map No. 20278, said portions of streets being previously dedicated as Lot "A" (North General Keamy Road) and Lot "B" (La Serena Way) in Tract Map No. 3334because this portion of right-of-way is no longer needed for street or highway purposes. (b) That the subject portions of Lots "C", "D", and "E" to be vacated are consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element and provide the required right of widths required thereby: (C) The right-of-way to be vacated by this resolution is excess right-of-way of a street not required for street or highway purposes. (d) This vacation is made pursuant to Section 8330 to 8336 of the Streets and Highways Code. (e) There are no public utility easements or facilities which will be affected by this vacation. Section 2. The portions of Lots "A", "B", and "C" described in Exhibits "A" and "B" which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference are hereby vacated and from and after the date of this Resolution is recorded, these portions of said Lots "A", "B", and "C" shall no longer constitute streets and public utility easements or right of way of the City of Temecula and shall revert to the property owner. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified copy of the Resolution to be recorded pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8336. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of June 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R :\agdrptLq9~O622\vacsolanawy 2 (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of meeting thereof held on the 22" day of June 1999, by the following vote: Temecula at a regular d AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R :\agdrpt~99~O622\vacsolanawy 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99- STREET VACATION Those portions of Solaria Way and Margarita Road, as shown as Lots "C","D" and "E" on Parcel Map 20278, on file in Book 127, Pages 35 and 36, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Northerly comer of said Lot "E" ; THENCE, along the Northeasterly line of said Lot "E", South 31 ° 59' 47" East, 11.00 feet; THENCE, parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Lots "D" and "E", South 58°00'13" West, 652.16 feet; THENCE, North 72° 57' 48" West, 35.01 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent 1945.00 foot radius curve, concave Northeasterly, having a radial bearing of South 61 ° 35' 14" West; THENCE, Northwesterly, along the are of said curve, through a central angle of 0° 16' 07", a distance of 9.12 feet to the Northerly line of said Lot "C"; THENCE, along said Northerly line of Lot "C", South 75° 04" 12" East, 33.60 feet to said Northwesterly line of said Lot "D"; THENCE, along said Northwesterly line of said Lots "D" and "E", North 58° 00' 13" East, 651.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 7416 square feet, more or less. Lice~Eipires: 9-30-00 Date: 903 mrgea, lgl ~R~EL 2 P~OEL 4 A PORT J ON OF PARO L 3 '~ , , ",N,. RESOLUTION NO. 99- No. DIRECTION DISTANCE LI N 31'59'47' W I1.00 L2 N 72'57'48' W 35.01 L3 N 75' 04' 12' W 33.60 No. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CI 0'16'07" 1945.00 9.12 SCALE I"=100 EXHIBIT 'B' RIGHT OF WAY VACATION / usr / pr o J dO f o/ r , gr'p l d,lZ~O~ l gO 3pl t 4.d(Jn RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS 3050 CHICAGO AVE.. SUITE 100, RIVERSi0E. CA 92507 SCALE I'=100 ( 0ATE JULY 15, 1997 PLOT 0ATEm 18-AUG-1997 JN 12903 II e#RCe~ · Parcel Map No. 20278 Location Ma-, ., NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 17 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: cr'l-Y ATT(~)RPNPERYOVAL~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council /'k~lliam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22, 1999 "All-Way Stop" - Margarita Road at DePortola Road PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- Traffic RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN "ALL-WAY STOP" INTERSECTION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLA ROAD BACKGROUND: During an evaluation of traffic safety at various locations within the City, it was determined that the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road had not been evaluated for installation of a traffic signal or an "All-Way Stop". Due to an increasing traffic volume on Margadta Road and DePortola Road, as a result of various developments in the southeast quadrant of the City, a study of this intersection was appropriate. Currently, the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road is controlled by a two-way stop on DePortola Road therefore, traffic on Margarita Road is not required to stop. A comprehensive study was conducted to determine if the existing traffic controls were adequate for the conditions. This study revealed that based on the existing traffic volumes and accident history, both a traffic signal and an "All-Way Stop" is currently warranted at this intersection. Based on the results of the study, staff recommended that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider establishing an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road. This recommendation was presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their May 13, 1999 regular meeting. After reviewing the staff report, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road. Replacement of the proposed "All-Way Stop" signs with a traffic signal will be considered as a part of the Capital Improvement Program. - 1 - R:~AGDRPt~99~0622~stopmargdeportola FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Account No. 001-164-601-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601-5410. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 99- 2. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 3. Exhibit "B" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report Signs - 2 - R:~AGDRPt~9~0622~stopmargdeportola RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN "ALL-WAY STOP" INTERSECTION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLA ROAD THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has considered the facts justifying the need for the stop signs proposed for the location described in this resolution. The City Council hereby finds and determines that installation of the stop signs pursuant to this resolution will enhance the public health safety and general welfare at this location and the proposed stop signs will not create any adverse conditions in the area. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following "ALL-WAY STOP" location is hereby established in the City of Temecula. Margarita Road and De Portola Road Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22"d day of June, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk - 3 - R:~AGDRPt~99\0622~stopmargdeportola (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of held on the 22" day of June, 1999, by the following Temecula at a regular meeting thereof d vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk - 4 - R:~AGDRPt~99~0622~stopmargdeportola EXHIBIT "A" - LOCATION MAP TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic May 13, 1999 Item 2 Installation of "Multi-Way Stop" - Margarita Road at De Portola Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing a "Multi-Way Stop" at the intersection of Margarita Road and De Portola Road. BACKGROUND: A review of the City's Traffic Signal Priority List revealed that the intersection of Margarita Road at De Portola Road did not appear on the list of intersections evaluated for potential traffic signal installation. An evaluation of traffic conditions has been performed to deEErmine if this intersection satisfies the minimum warrant criteria for the installation of traffic signals. Margarita Road is identified on the City's Circulation Element as an 86 foot wide four lane Arterial Highway with a 14-foot wide raised median. Currently, Margarita Road at De Portola Road is 44 feet wide with one travel lane in each direction. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Margarita Road. De Portola Road, west of Margarita Road is identified on the City's Circulation Element as a 64 foot wide four lane Secondary Highway. East of Margarita Road, De Portola Road is identified as a 76 foot wide four lane Major Highway with a 12-foot wide raised median. Currently, De Portola Road is 40 feet wide with one travel lane in each direction. The speed limit is posted at 50 MPH on De Portola Road. "Stop" signs on De Portola Road control the intersection. The justification for the installation of a traffic signal at an intersection is based on a series of eleven (11) warrants that have been established by Caltrans. Satisfying any one of these warrants, or a combination of warrants, could be justification for the installation of a traffic signal. These warrants are contained in the Caltrans Traffic Manual that has been adopted by the City of Temecula as a guideline to be used in the evaluation and installation of various traffic control devices, including traffic signals and "Stop" signs. The traffic signal warrant analysis performed for the intersection of Margarita Road at De Portola Road indicates that all applicable warrants are satisfied one hundred percent (100%) and a traffic signal is justified at this intersection. A copy of this analysis is included as Exhibit "B" . r:\traffic\comrnissn\agendn\99\0513\margdepomtop/ajp 2. 3. 4. 5. The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that under certain conditions where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, multi-way stop controls may be used as an interim measure. There are four (4) criteria that Caltrans has established for the evaluation of "Multi-Way Stop" signs. These criteria are as follows: Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations. An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Minimum Traffic Volumes The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but C, When the 85-percential approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. 4. School area traffic control recommendations/warrants. The "Multi-Way Stop" warrant analysis indicates that all applicable warrants are satisfied one hundred percent (100%) and "Multi-Way Stop" signs are justified at Margarita Road and De Portola Road. A copy of this analysis is included as Exhibit "D" . Since the intersection of Margarita Road at De Portola Road satisfies the criteria for installation of a traffic signal, staff recommends the installation of "Multi-Way Stop" signs as an interim measure. Installation of a signal at this intersection will be included in the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program for consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: $500.00 for the installation of two (2) "Stop" signs and associated striping. Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Exhibit "C' - Collision Diagram Exhibit "D" - "Multi-Way Stop" Warrant Analysis Exhibit "E" - Traffic Signal Priority List r: \traffic \commissnXag enda \99\0513 \margdeportstop/ajp ITEM 18 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANC CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ./'~.William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22,1999 Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation - Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas, Project No. PW97-29 PREPARED BY: Brian Gulllot, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the project "Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho California Road & Via Las Colinas", Project No. PW97-29, as complete; and File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and , Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On January 12, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract for the project "Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho California Road & Via Las Colinas", Project PW97- 29 to DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California, in the amount of '~75,269.00. The project included the installation of traffic signals and safety lighting at the subject location. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount for this project was $75,813.80. Contract Change Order No. 1 was approved by the City Manager in the amount of $544.80. The project was funded by Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds and Development Impact Fees (DIF). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit r:~agdrpt\99\O622\pw97-29.acc 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula. CA 92589-9033 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to DBX, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: Traffic Signal Installation Rancho California Road at Via Los Colinas Project No. PW97-29 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on June 22, 1999. That upon said contract the Great American Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 97-29. 6. The street address of said property is: Rancho California Road at Via Los Colinas Dated at Temecula, California, this 22"" day of June, 1999. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk I, Susan W, Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 22"d day of June, 1999. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk BOND# 3972702 PREMIUM: INCLUD, ED IN PERFORMANCE BOND CITY OF TEMECULA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO. PW97- 29 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCNO CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS KNOWALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT: 42066 AVENIDA ALVARADO, SUITE C DBX, INCORPORATED TEMECULA, CA 92~90 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR CORPORATION , hereinafter called Principal. and (fill in whether a Cori~oration, Partnership or individual) P.O. BOX 5440 GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ORANGE, CA 92863-5440 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURE'~'Y hereinafter called SURETY. are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA. hereinafter called OWNER. in the penal sum of SEVEN THOUSANp FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE DOLLARS and THIRTY-EIGHT CENTS ($ 7,581,38 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, fo~ the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns. jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLtGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 12..Z]L day of .TANUARY __, 19 99 , a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW97-29, TRAFRC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCH0 CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of six (6) months after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER. against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS. the said Contract has been completed, and was aDOroved on MAY 27 , 19 99. NOW. THEREFORE. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execQtion of said work, and the carrying out of the ter~ns of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue. otherwise this instrument shall be void. R:%CIP~PROJECTS%INVeT~PWi?-29~BIO-DOC M/~INTENANCE BOND M- I Signed and seated this 7TB day of JU~E · 19 99. (Seal) SURETY GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY DAVID L. CULBERTSON (Name) ATTORNEY- IN-FACT (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M, T~orson, City Attorney (Name) President & Sec./Treas. {Title) By: (Name) (Title) R:~.Clle~PROJECTS',PW97'~PW97-29~ID-OOc CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Riverside On June 9, 1999 before me, Date personally appeared Jim Perry Phyllissa G. Maynor, Notary Public Name sod l~tle ol Officer (e.g., *Jane Doe, Nola~/Public") Nl~ne~s) ol Signer(s) personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personS) whose name~) isJiH:~ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he,~lg3PaliN.{~executed the same in his/~j~(;~tj{ authorized capacity(lee), and that by his/l~eifillX signature(~ on the instrument the person(~), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary PuDtic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Jim PerrV Signer's Name: ~ Individual ~ Corporate Officer Title(s): President & Sec./~reas. [] Partner -- [] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact ~ Trustee ~ Guardian or Conservator F7 Other: Top of thumb here [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): [] Partner- [] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee r-I Guardian or Conservator []' Other: Top Of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: ,'.. DBX, Inc. 1995 Nal~nal Nolan/Association · 8236 Rernrnet Ave., P.O. 8ox 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder CeM To41-Freo 1-800-876-6827 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE On 6-07-99 be fore me, LEXIE SHERWOOD - NOTARY PUBLIC personally appeared DAVID L. CUlaAERTSON personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. LexieSherwoocl (3C~:JExl) July 27 2001 ~_.-.,_ .... , .... ---_ OP TI ONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE BOND T~TI, E OR TYPE OF ~ NITMBER OF PAGES 2 DATEOF~ 6-07-99 [] INDIVIDUAL [] PARTNER ( S ) [] OTHER: CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE (S) [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(S) AIVERIC i INSURANCE COMPANY' 580 WALNUT STREET · CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 · 513-369-5000 · FAX 513-723-2740 The number of persons authorized by this power of attorney is not more than No. 013630 SIX POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint the person or persons named below its true and lawful attorney-in-fact. for it and in its name, place and stead to execute in bchalf ot' the sa;d Company, as surety, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts ofsuretyship, or other written obligations in the nature thereof; provided that the liability of the said ~ompany on an~ such bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall not exceed the limit stated below. Name Address Limit of Power DAVID L. CULBERTSON DIANA LASKOWSKI ALL OF ALL LINDA L. CULBERTSON KAREN CHANDLER ANAHEIM, UNLIMITED CHARLES L. FLAKE R.A. COON CALIFORNIA 'Fhis Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in behalf of the attorncy(s)-m-lact named above. IN WI'FNESS WHEREOF thc GREAT AMERiCAN INSURANCE CON.I PANY has caused :hose presents to be signed and attested bv its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 2rid day of February ,1999 Attest GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF OHIO. COUNTY OF HAMILTON -- ss: On this 2rid day of February, ].999 , before me personally appeared DOUGLAS R. BOWEN. to me known. being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resided in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he is the Vice President of the Bond Division of Great American Insurance Company. the Company described in and which executed the above instrumenU that he knows the seal; that it was so affixed by authority of his office under the By-Laws of said Company, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority. This Power of ..\ttorncv is granted by authortry of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Great American Insurance Company bv unarumous written consent dated March 1, 1993. RESOLVED: That the Division President, the several Division Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice Presidents, or any one of them, be and hereby is authorized. from tinle t o finie, to appoint one or more A ttorneys-ln-Fact to execute on behalfof the Company, as surety. any and all bonds, undertakings and contrac,'s orsuretyship, or other written obl~ations in the nature thereo~' ,,o prescribe their respective du.ties and the respective limits of their authority; and to revoke any such appointment at any time. RESOLVED FUR THER: That the Company seal and the signature of any of the aforesaid officers and any Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company may be affixed by Facsimile ro any power of attorney or certificate of either given For the execution of any bond, undertaking, contract or surelyship, or other written obligation in the nature thereof, such signa lure an d seal when so used being hereby adop ted by the Company as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the Company, to be valid and binding upon the Company with the same Force and effect as though manually affixed. CERTIFICATION I, RONALD C. HAYES, Assistant Secretary of Great American Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney and the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of March 1, 1993 have not been revoked and are now in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this 7TH day of JUNE . 1999 S1029S (I Iz97) ~L'DiT BT; O' D'DD ; O;DOF~ ; CITT 9F TE~EEUL~- ~DTD~Z1O~ 1f 1 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW97-29 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLA T!ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD A T VIA i. AS COLINAS This is to certify that DBX, Inc. . {hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula. under o~th, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment. and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of ~ha~ certain worl< of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW97-29, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT VIA LAS COLINAS, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho Ca. Rd. & Via Las Colinas INSERT 'fffl'~: Oi::'WORK HERE The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or ctaims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the CiTy, and each of them, from any and atl claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Te. mecula of any contact amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: 6/10/99 CONTRACTOR By: ? Jim Perry, p~s~dent' Print Name and Title RELEASE R;~C I~PR OJ~CT S ~'W0 7 ',,PWg?- 29%BiDDOC ITEM 19 ORDINANCE NO. 99-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX TO FINANCE THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITHIN THE TERRITORY ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO No. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, there is hereby levied and assessed a special tax by the City of Temecula on each parcel of property in the territory annexed to the City of Temecula as part of the reorganization designated as LAFCO No. 98-14-1 (Redhawk and Vail Ranch) for each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year 2000-01. Section 2. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year shall be $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. Section 3. The special tax imposed by this ordinance shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. Section 4. The revenue raised by the special tax imposed by this ordinance shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of operating, maintaining, and servicing public parks and recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith. Section 5. The City Council, by three (3) affirmative votes, is empowered to establish the amounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in amounts not to exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this ordinance, as is required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in this ordinance. Ords\99-11 1 Section 6. The City Council shall be empowered to amend this ordinance by three (3) affirmative votes of the members thereof for the purposes of carrying out the general purposes of this ordinance in order to conform to state law that permits the County Tax Collector, or other proper official, to collect a special tax such as is levied by this ordinance in conjunction with County taxes or in order to assign duties pursuant to the ordinance to other officers. Section 7. No section of this ordinance shall be construed to permit, and the City Council is expressly prohibited from, increasing the amounts of the special tax imposed by this ordinance beyond the maximum amounts set forth in this ordinance. Section 8. A property owner subject to the special tax may appeal the amount of the special tax to be levied on such property owner's property pursuant to standards and procedures established by resolution of the City Council. Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special tax during a specific fiscal year would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owners may appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal pursuant to standards and procedures established by resolution of the City Council. Section 10. The special tax imposed by this ordinance shall not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. Section 11. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdic- tion, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. The City Council, and the electorate by referendum, do hereby declare that they would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 12. This ordinance, or any provisions thereof other than those provisions, if any, which provide for modification by the City Council of the City of Temecula, may only be amended or repealed by approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting on the ordinance or provisions thereof at any initiative or referendum election. Section 13. This ordinance shall be referred to, and shall be effective only if approved by two-thirds (2/3) of, the voters within the annexation area for LAFCO 98-14-1 voting at an election to be held on November 2, 1999, and shall go into effect on the effective date of the annexation of LAFCO 98-14-1. Section 14. The City Clerk shall cedify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published as required by law. Ords\99-11 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Coundl on the 8th day of June, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of June, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Ords\99-11 3 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JUNE 8, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:35 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Comerchero presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts Stone, and Comerchero. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1,1 Approve the minutes of April 20, 1999; 1.2 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1999; 1.3 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1999. 2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months ended March 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 1999. MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 2. The motion was seconded by Director Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Director Roberts who abstained with regard to Item 1.3 (Minutes of May 25, 1999). DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Community Services Director Parker commented and invited the public to the upcoming Fourth of July Festivities; thanked the sponsors associated with these festivities; and further elaborated on upcoming summer programs, including Summer Day Camp. Minutes,csd\060899 1 Housing Redevelopment Manager Meyer provided information with regard to the Great Race Lunch Stop in Old Town, on Saturday, June 19, 1999, advising that this event was sponsored by the History Channel. In light of the City hosting this particular event, Director Comerchero advised that the History Channel donated a television and VCR to the Friends of the Library. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT General Manager Nelson noted that the Summer/Fall Recreation Brochure has been sent out and commended the Community Services Department on a job well done. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 7:39 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 22, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes,csd\060899 2 ITEM 2 APPROV~I~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors ~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22,1999 Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, lnc. for FY1999-00 PREPARED BY: /"~Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc. to accept the reassignment of the original agreement between the City and Excel Landscape, Inc., to the Temecula Community Services District, in the amount of $738,468 and an additional amount not to exceed $65,820 for sites to be brought on line during the term on the contract for Fiscal Year 1999-00. Extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years and allow for the addition of supplement landscape maintenance contract areas for the term of the agreement. 3. Approve contingency of 10% in the amount of $73,850 for extra work items. BACKGROUND: Excel Landscape, Inc. (Excel) has been providing landscape maintenance services for neighborhood parks and the north slope areas since July 1, 1997. Upon the resignation of California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. on July 10, 1998, Excel assumed the maintenance of the south slope areas, medians, sports parks and City facilities on July 11, 1998. The conditions of some of the newly acquired areas were questionable and required some extra attention. Excel did not request any additional compensation for their extra efforts to improve these site conditions. The quality of their work and commitment to customer service has been excellent. TCSD staff has negotiated the omission of the Consumer Price Index increase (approximately 2 %), as part of the proposed two (2) year contract extension. A potential savings to the City of approximately $14,800 per year. The contract amendment also has provisions that allow for the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance contract areas that come on line during the remaining term of the agreement. The R://HARRINGK/AGENDA.RPT/EXCELEXTEND99-00.TCSD1 proposed areas are spelled out in Exhibit B of the contract amendment. In addition to the General Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment the TCSD is requesting the approval of a 10% contingency, required for extra work items. These extra work items may include repairing, rehabilitating and improving City sites. The contract also contains other provisions to extend the agreement for an additional two-year term and allow for the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance contract areas that will come on line during the remaining term of the agreement. This would require the approval by the Board of Directors. The re-assignment of the original agreement between the City of Temecula (City) and Excel Landscape, Inc., (Excel) to the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) is required to correct some technical concerns the City Attorney has with the present agreement. The original agreement was between the City and Excel, however all of the subsequent amendments (a total of six) are between the TCSD and Excel. In order to mitigate his concerns the City Attorney has structured the contract amendment before you to allow for this re-assignment of the original agreement to the TCSD. The reassignment will require the approval of both the City Council and the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Excel Landscape, Inc. including the additional sites to be added during the term of the contract and the 10% contingency for Fiscal Year 1999-00 is $878,138. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1999-00 in accounts 190-180, 190-181,190-182, 190-184, 190-185, 340-701,340-702, 001- 164 and 001-171. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment Original Agreement Six (6) Subsequent Amendments R:IIHARRINGKIAGENDA.RPTIEXCELEXTEND99-OO.TCSDI AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 22, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), Temecula Community Services District ("District") and Excel Landscape, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which the parties agree are true and correct: a. On June 247 1997, the City and Contractor, for the benefit of the District, entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights -of-way. b. The original Agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1998, and March 22, 1999, April 5, 1999, and April 15, 1999 in order to add areas to the Contractor's Scope of Work. The June 24, 1997 Agreement, as amended, shall be referred to as the "Agreement." c. Section 9, of the Agreement provides for a contract term of 24 months which would expire on June 24, 1999 and a provision for two one year extensions of the term of the agreement. d. It is the desire of the parties to extend the term of this Agreement for an additional period of two (2) years with a modified contract price and provisions to add new parks and landscaped areas to the Scope of Work. Section 2. of the Agreement, Scope of Work, is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. SCOPE OF WORK "A . Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with the "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the areas described in the RFP and specifically designated on Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B. A number of additional areas within the City will require landscape maintenance services upon the completion of certain facilities during the term of this Agreement, which areas described on Exhibit B, Supplement Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc as follows: follows: follows: reference. Upon the effective date of any Change Order pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement authorizing Contractor to provide landscape maintenance services for one or more of the areas described on Exhibit B, Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with the "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the designated areas." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement, Change Orders, is hereby amended to read "3. CHANGE ORDERS "The City Manager is hereby authorized to approve Change Orders which: (1) authorize the Contractor to proceed with landscape maintenance services for one or more of the Supplement Contract Areas designated in Exhibit B at the prices set forth in Exhibit B; or (2) modify the scope of work for a Contract Area, a Supplemental Contract Area or the General Lan.dscape Maintenance Specifications so long as the cumulative total costs of all such modifications under this subsection (2) does not increase the total annual cost of the services provided under this Agreement by more than ten percent (10%). All other Change Orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors." 4. Section 4 of the Agreement, Payments, is hereby amended to read as "4. COMPENSATION; PAYMENTS "The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually performed in accordance with the price schedules set forth in Exhibits A and B. Contractor shall submit monthly invoices to the City specifying the work accomplished during the period covered (ie., fertilization, pest control, etc.). The City shall review the invoices submitted by Contractor to determine whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made within thirty-five (35) days following receipt of the invoice or City shall provide Contractor with a written statement objecting to the invoice and specifying the objections. Monthly invoices shall be sent to the City 's Finance Department at the address specified in Section 25." 5. Section 9 of the Agreement, Term, is hereby amended to read as "9. TERM The Amendment shall remain in full force and effect until June 30, 2001. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause, on thirty (30) days written notice to the other party." R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe 6. The Section 19, Insurance, of Section 1, Instruction and Information, of the Request for Proposal dated May 21, 1997 and incorporated into the Agreement pursuant to Section 1. of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows: "19. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. as broad as: Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker' s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. "b . Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than: (1) General Liability: two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. "c . Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, District and, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. "d . Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc (1) The District and the City, and their respective officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, District and, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, District and, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, District and, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, District and, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the District by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the District. "e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. "f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the District with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an alternative to the District' s forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. Exhibit E , Insurance Forms, attached to this RFP and are incorporated herein as though set forth in full." R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe 7. Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this Seventh Amendment, is hereby substituted in place of all Exhibits to the Agreement and the Amendments to the Agreement, including Exhibits 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 5A, and 6. 8. Exhibit B, Supplemental Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this Seventh Amendment, is hereby added to the Agreement. 9. City hereby assigns the Agreement to the District, which assignment is accepted by the District. City hereby ratifies the acts of the District taken pursuant to Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. 10. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. //// IIII R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreemere to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Steven J. Ford Mayor TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Jeff Comerchero President Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney/District Counsel EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC., a California Corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe Site # P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 EXHIBIT A Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas (Amended as of June 8, 1999) NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site Name Veterans Park Sam Hicks Monument Park Calle Amgon Park Bahia Vista Park Loma Linda Park Riverton Park John Magee Park Voorburg Park Nicolas Road Park Butterfield Stage Park Temecula Duck Pond Rotary Park Nakayama Park Winchester Creek Park MonthIv Price $1,550.00 800.00 250.00 250.00 707.00 1,617.00 310.00 303.00 812.00 782.00 2,155.00 300.00 125.00 1,568.00 Annual Price $18,600.00 9,600.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 8,484.00 19,404.00 3,720.00 3,636.00 9,744.00 9,384.00 25,860.00 3,600.00 1,500.00 18,816.00 TOTAL $ 11,529.00 $138,348.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe STREETSCAPE SERVICE AREA Site # SS-1 Site Name Via Eduardo Streetscape Monthly Price $106.00 Annual Price $1,272.00 TOTAL $ 106.00 $ 1,272.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Exc¢I Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 (P-8) SP-5 Site Name Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park Pala Community Park Kent Hintergardt Park Margarita Community Park Monthly Price $9,294.00 3,592.00 2,333.00 3,359.00 3,147.00 Annual Price $111,528.00 43, 104.00 27,996.00 40,308.00 37,764.00 TOTAL $ 21,725.00 $ 260,700.00 R:\HARRINGK'xAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7,doe MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site # M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 Site Name Rancho California Road Median Ynez Road Median Butterfield Stage Road Median Margarita Road Median Margarita Road Median at 79 South TOTAL Monthly Price $400.00 500.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 $ 1,250.00 AnnuaiPrice $4,800.00 6,000.00 1,800.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 $15,000.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA Site # F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 (SS-2) Site Name Community Recreation Center Senior Center City Hall/Maintenance Facility Temecula Community Center Fire Station #84 Old Town Parking Lot A Old Town Streetscape Monthly Price $1,444.00 361.00 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 Annual Price $17,328.00 4,332.00 6,492.00 2,316.00 4,800.00 3,000.00 11,844.00 TOTAL $ 4,176.00 $ 50,112.00 R: \HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe SLOPE SERVICE AREA (SOUTH) Site # S-3a S-3b S-4 S-8 S-12 S-13 S-16 Site Name Rancho Highlands Rancho Highlands - Ynez Road Slope The Vineyards The Villages A and B Vintage Hills Presley (Viranda, Country Glen, Bridlevale) Tradewinds Monthly Price $515.00 1,000.00 255.00 4,734.00 4,600.00 1,408.00 863.00 Annual Price $6,180.00 12,000.00 3,060.00 56,808.00 55,200.00 16,896.00 10,356.00 TOTAL $ 13.375.00 $ 160,500.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe SLOPE SERVICE AREA (NORTH) Site # Site Name S-1 Saddlewood/Pavillion Point S-2 Winchester Creek I and II S-5 Signet Series S-6 Woodcrest Country S-7 Ridgeview S-9 Rancho Solana S-10 Martinique S-11 Meadowview Estates S-14 Mirada S-15 Barclay Estates S-17 Monte Vista Monthly Price $2,372.00 1,202.00 2,534.00 559.00 773.00 130.00 355.00 150.00 394.00 344.00 565.00 Annual Price $28,464.00 14,424.00 30,408.00 6,708.00 9,276.00 1,560.00 4,260.00 1,800.00 4,728.00 4,128.00 6,780.00 TOTAL $ 9,378.00 $112,536.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc Site # M-6 M-7 M-8 M-9 M-10 M-11 M-12 M-13 M-14 EXHIBIT B Supplement Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas (Amended as of June 8, 1999) MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site Name Margarita Road Median at Solana Ridge Margarita Road Median at Tuscany Ridge Margarita Road Median at Winchester Road Margarita Road Median at Promenade Mall Margarita Road Median at T-28850 Winchester Road Median at Jefferson Rancho California Road Median at Porta~no Paseo Del Sol Median Islands Solana Way Median Islands MonthIv Price $50.00 100.00 50.00 300.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 500.00 75.00 TOTAL $ 1,350.00 Annual Price $600.00 1,200.00 600.00 3,600.00 900.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 6,000.00 900.00 16,200.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc SPORTS PARK SERVICE AREAS Site # SP-6 Site Name Temeku Hills Sports Park Monthly Price $3,600.00 Annual Price $43,200.00 TOTAL $ $3,600.00 $ 43.200.00 R:\HARRINGK'xAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA Site # F-8 F-9 Site Name Temecula Valley Museum Old Town Parking Lot B Monthly Price $285.00 250.00 AnnuaiPrice $3,420.00 3,000.00 TOTAL $ 535.00 $ 6,420.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered into this 241h day of June 1997. By and Between City ofTemecula, a Municipal corporation hereinafier referred to as "CITY" and Excel Landscape. Inc. a California Corporation hereinafier referred to as "CONTRACTOR" RECITALS WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain the services of a landscape maintenance Contractor to perform landscape maintenance within the CITY's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. WHEREAS, Contractor is a firm that possesses the necessary equipment, licenses, insurance, and personnel to provide such services; and WHEREAS, CITY's Council has authorized execution of this AGREEMENT to retain the services of Contractor. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that CITY does hereby retain Contractor to provide landscape maintenance under the ti>llowing terms: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The complete Contract includes the following documents: 1) RFP and 2) General Landscape Specifications. When the Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK t~ttlleyb~gerda~qr~197-8 CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for slopes (north) and neighborhood parks as described in the RFP. 3. CHANGE ORDERS All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manger is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 4. PAYMENTS The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually performed in accordance with the pricing sheets attached hereto as Exhibits I and 2, and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Included with monthly billing will be the work functions accomplished during that period, (i.e., fertilization, pest control, etc.). The City shall review the invoices submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made thirty-five (35) days following submittal of the invoice, or City shall provide the Contractor with a written statement objecting to the invoice. Monthly invoices shall be sent to: City of Temecula Finance Department 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: NONPERFORMANCE Contractor may be assessed penalties by City up to one hundred percent (100%) of the monthly value of a site for nonperformance and up to sixty percent (60%) of the monthly value of a site for substandard performance. Such penalties shall be assessed at the discretion of the City. Contractor shall be notified of any penalties in accordance with the terms of this Contract. The Contract may be terminated by City for failure of Contractor to satisfactorily perform any corrective action after being notified of service failure on more than seven(7) occasions during the base term of the Contract. C, Contractor shall be notified of service failure by delivery of a "Performance Deficiency Notification" form to Contractor by City. Said notice will serve as formal notification that Contractor has incurred a service rxl~rtu. yb~sgenluXlnd'97-8.tfp deficiency sufficiently material that contract termination may result if satisfactory corrective action is not taken by Contractor. The Performance Deficiency Notification will contain the acceptable time period for service correction. Upon Deficiency Notification, the correction will either be accepted or rejected. If accepted, part or all of the penalties may be waived, regardless of whether City has incurred loss as a result of said service failure. Contractor will be notified of correction acceptance status by delivery of a Performance Deficiency Status Memorandum. Should correction not be accepted, a separate additional Performance Deficiency Notification will be delivered to Contractor, thus increasing the number of Deficiency Notices received by Contractor. If Contractor should neglect or refuse or fail for any reason to perform the work, the City may terminate the Contract for nonperformance with five (5) days written notice to Contractor. In case of termination by the City for nonperformance, the City may contract or cause to be done any work not completed at the time of the termination, and the Contractor shall pay for such work. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making each request for payment, Contractor shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract; the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall execute an affidavit and release with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each crat~, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 8. LIABILITY INSURANCE rxhartleyb~gerntu'tltd97,8.rfp CONTRACTOR, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies: "I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 9. TERM A, The Contract shall remain in full force and effect for a period of 24 months from the date of written notice to proceed, unless terminated by either party. City reserves the right to exercise its option to extend this Agreement for two one- year extensions within ninety (90) days prior to its expiration. Contract price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each calendar year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles-Anaheim- Riverside Area published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (CPI). Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause within thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this COntract. All time requirements stated herein shall be satisfied. 11. INDEMNIFICATION All work covered by this Contract done at the work site or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the 9bligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. rXimftleyb~aget~as~n~97-8.rfp 12. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may herea/~er exist or of conditions or difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the pan of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 13. GRATUI TIE S CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other provider of Specifications. Contractor further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR°S AFFIDAVIT Simultaneously with submitting each monthly invoice, Contractor shall file with the City his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all sub-contractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. SIGNATURE OF Contractor Corporations The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's office. Partnerships The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The proposal must be signed by all partners comprising the pannership unless proof in the form of a certified copy of a certificate ofpannership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner is presented to the City Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign. rU~rl~yb~g~n~lg7-8.rfp Joint Ventures Proposals submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer. Individuals Proposals subrnjtted by individuals must be signed by the Contractor, unless an up-to-date power of attorney is on file in the City Cierk's office, in which case said person may sign for the individual. The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition, however, where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature. 17. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 18. BOOKS AND RECORDS CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 19. UTII,ITY LOCATION CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 20. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4216.2. 2 I. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan for worker protection during the excavation of trenches required by the scope of the ~vork in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705. A, CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as soon as Contractor, or any of Contractors sub-contractors, agents, or employees have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following conditions: r~hankyb~r. cndMM~197-8.tfp The presence of any material that the Contractor believes is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code: Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated in the specifications; or Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract. Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken, Contractor shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the hazardous waste or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person. CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in the exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, then CITY shall issue a change order. D, In the event of a dispute between CITY and Contractor as to whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or part of the work, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date, and shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract. Contractor shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. 22. INSPECTION The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by authorized CITY personnel. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time a~er completion of the work. 23. DISCRIMINATION CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 24. GOVERNING LAW This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. Venue shall be the County of Riverside. In the event litigation is commenced by either party with respect to this contract, the prevailing party in such litigation, as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees. rU~trtleybxager~as~lnd97-8.rfp 25. WRITTEN NOTICE Any written notice required to be given in any part of ~he Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: reek, City Clerk r'~ha~l~yb~geulM~d97-8.rfp EXHIBIT 1 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 Site Name Monthly Price Annual Price Veterans Park $] ,5~.00 $'18,600.00 Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00 $ 9,600.00 Calle Aragon Park $ 933.00 $ 3,000.00 Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00 Loma Linda Park $ 707.00 $ 8,484.00 Pdvenon Park $1,617.00 $19,404.00 John Magee Park $ 310.00 $ 3,720.00 Voorburg Park $ 303.00 S 3,636.~ Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00 $ 9,744.00 Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00 $ 9,384.00 Temecula Duck Pond $1,]~5.00 Rotary Park $ 300.00 $ 3,600.00 Nakayama Park $ 125.00 $1,500.00 TOTAL $8,961.00 $107,532.00 EXHIBIT 2 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SLOPE SERVICE AREA (NORTH) Site # S-1 S-2 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-9 S-10 S-11 S-14 S-15 Site Name Saddlewood/Pavillion Point Winchester Creek I and II Signet Series Woodcrest Country Pddgeview Rancho Solana Martinique Meadowview Estates Mirada Barclay Estates Monthly Price $ ~,~?~-(Y) $ l $ 2,534.00 $ 559.00 $ 773.00 $ l"~,m $ 355.00 $ 150.00 $ 394.00 $ 344.00 Annual Price $ la,a?a m $ 6.708.00 $ 9,276.00 $ ~ ,560.00 $ 4,2C~0.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 4,7~.00 $ 4.]~a.00 TOTAL $ 8,813,00 $ lf]~,7~6 ?atho AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1.1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape. Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: purposes: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an agreement for landscape maintenance services within the CITY's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, _parks and rights-of-way. ("Agreement"). Amendment. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this 2. Exhibit 1 to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 1A is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BY: Ronald E. Bradley, City~'.,r ATTEST: BY: S o s, Cjt Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Excel Landscape, Inc. TITLE: vF)~~ Site # P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-IO P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 SS-1 ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT 1A City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site Name Veterans Park Sam Hicks Monument Park Calle Aragon Park Bahia Vista Park Loma Linda Park Riverton Park John Magee Park Voorburg Park Nicolas Road Park Butterfield Stage Park Temecula Duck Pond Rotary Park Nakayama Park Via Eduardo Streetscape Monthly Price Annual Price 1,550.00 $ 18.600.00 800,00 9.600.00 250.00 3.000.00 :250,00 3.000.00 707.00 8.484.00 1,617.00 19.404.00 310.00 3.720.00 303.00 3.636.00 812.00 9.744.00 782.00 9.384.00 1.155.00 13.860.00 300.00 3,600.00 125.00 1.500.00 106.00 1,272.00 TOTAL ~9.067.00 ~108.804.00 ii':] ,~ ~ AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 11, 1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. ("Agreement"). B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Exhibits 3, 4, 5, and 6 to the Agreement are hereby added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement will be terminated effective July 1, 1999. R:tRUSEPICONTRACTtAMDEXCEL WPD IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Temecula Community Services District Attest: one Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney RARUSEP~CONTRACT~4MDEXCEL WPD ATTACHMENT A R.'~USEPtCONTI~CT~4MDI~XCEL WPD Site # S-3a S-3b S-4 S-8 S-12 S-13 S-16 EXHIBIT 3 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SLOPE SERVICE AREA (SOUTH) Site Name Rancho Highlands Rancho Highlands-Ynez Road Slope The Vineyards The Villages A & B Vintage Hills Presley (Viranda, Country Glen/ 79 South, Bridlevale) Tradewinds Monthly Price Annual Price $ 515.00 $ 6,180.00 1.000.00 1 ~.000.00 755.00 3.060.00 4.734.00 56.808.00 4,600.00 55. ~ 00.00 1.408.00 16.896.00 863.00 10.356.00 TOTAL $13.375.00 ~160.500.00 ~orlze/d~Sig~t ~ R.-iRUSEPICONTR/IC-I~i.~.fDF~yCI:'L WPD EXHIBIT 4 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance MEDIANS SERVICE AREA M-1 M-2 M-3 M4 Site Name Rancho California Road Median Ynez Road Median Butterfield Stage Road Median Margarita Road Median Monthly Price $ $ 500.00 $ $ 1cf),00 Annual Price S 4,8(](],00 $ 6,000.00 $1,800.00 $ 1 TOTAL t~re EXHIBIT 5 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA SP-I SP-2 SP-3 P-8 (SP-4) Site Name Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park Pala Commumty Park Kent Hintergardt Park Monthly Price $ 9,294.00 $ 3,592.00 $ 2.333.00 $ 3,359.00 Annual Price $111,528.00 S 4t,lfi4_Cll $ 27.996.OO TOTAL $ 18.578.00 hotur~e EXHIBIT 6 City, of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA Site # F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 Site Name Community Recreation Center Senior Center City Hall/Maintenance Facility Temecuia Commumty Center Fire Station #84 Old Town Parking Lot Monthly Price $ $ 361,00 $ 54_l.00 $ 193,00 $ 580.00 $ 250.00 Annual Price $17,328.00 $ 4,332.00 $ 6,492.00 $ 2,316.00 S 6,of43_m $ 3,000,00 TOTAL $ 3,369.00 h.~~i~atur'c/d'C AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as o: January 1 I, 1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way ("Agreement"). B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 1 A to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 1 B is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Jo~e..'Alfaro o , er , Tem/~.~y Services District Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager Attest: 1Jones, Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT 1B (As amended January 11, 1999) City of Temecula Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 SS-1 Site Name Monthly Price Veterans Park $ 1,550.00 Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00 Calle Aragon Park $ 250.00 Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00 Loma Linda Park $ 707.00 Riverton Park $ 1.617.00 John Magee Park $ 310.00 Voorburg Park $ 303.00 Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00 Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00 Temecula Duck Pond $ 1,155.00 Rotary Park $ 300.00 Nakayama Park $ 125.00 Winchester Creek Park $ 1.568.00 Via Eduardo Streetscape $ 106.00 Annual Price $18.600.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 8,484.00 $19,404· 00 $ 3,720.00 $ 3,636.00 $ 9,744.00 ~ 9,384.00 $13.860.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 1,500.00 $18,816.00 $ 1,272.00 TOTAL $ 10,635.00 9127,620.00 Authorized Signature AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 22, 1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: Ae On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, and January 11, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the Agreement. B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 4 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 4A will be added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. The cost for this new site will be $100.00 per month. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. RAHARRINGK ~AGE.VDA.RPT~EXCEL AMENDAIENT 4A FY 98-99.DOC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape J I her Tem~ Services District Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager Attest: Susan W Jones, CMC Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R:tHJRRINGK~4GEND,4.RPT~XCE],, ,4MENDMENT 4,4 FY J)8-99.DOC ATTACHMENT "A" R: ~HARRINGKU,I GEND.4.RPT~iZ VCEL AhtENDMENT 4.4 FY 98-99.DOC F_3Gi]3]T 4A (As amended March 22, 1999) City of Temecula Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site # M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 *M-5 Site Name Monthly Price Rancho California Road Median ~ 400.00 Ynez Road Median $ 500.00 Butterfield Stage Road Median $ 150.00 Margarita Road Median $ 100.00 Margarita Road Median at 79 South $ 100.00 Annual Price $ 4,800.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 * New Site TOTAL $ 1,250.00 $15,000.00 Sig/ure~ R:tf.I.4RRINGKL4GENDA.RpT~F_,VCEL AMENDMENT 4A FY 98-99.DOC AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 5, 1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: Ae On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999 and March 22, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the Agreement· B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 1 B to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 1 C is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Teme I .~y Services District ~elson, Acting City Manager Attest: Susan W. JoneS, CMC City C erk Approved as to form: Peter M. orson City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A" EX}t/BIT 1C (As amended April 5, 1999) City of Temecula Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-9 P-IO P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 SS-1 *SS-2 Site Name Veterans Park Sam Hicks Monument Park Calle Aragon Park Bahia Vista Park Loma Linda Park Rivercon Park John Magee Park Voorburg Park Nicolas Road Park Butterfield Stage Park Temecula Duck Pond Rotary Park Nakayama Park Winchester Creek Park Via Eduardo Streetscape Old Town Streetscape Monthly Price Annual Price 1,550.00 $18,600.00 800.00 9 9,600.00 250.00 9 3,000.00 250.00 $ 3,000.00 707.00 $ 8,484.00 1,617.00 $19,404.00 310.00 $ 3,720.00 303.00 $ 3,636.00 812.00 9 9,744.00 782.00 $ 9,384.00 1,155.00 913,860.00 300.00 $ 3,600.00 125.00 $ 1,500.00 1,568.00 918,816.00 106.00 $ 1,272.00 987.00 $11,844.00 * New Site TOTAL $ 11,622.00 $139,464.00 AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 15, 1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way· This original agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999, March 22, 1999 and April 1, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the Agreement. B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. Exhibit 5 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 5A will be added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape T.7~t~y Services District Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager Attest: ~~~- k. ,'~ ~,~~ Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A" EXI-]]BIT 5A (As amended April 15, 1999) City of Temecula Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA Site # SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 (P-8) *SP-5 Site Name Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park Pala Community Park Kent Hintergardt Park Margarita Community Park Monthly Price Annual Price 9,294.00 $111,528.00 3,592.00 $ 43, 104.00 2,333.00 $ 27,996.00 3,359.00 $ 40,308.00 3,147.00 $ 37,764.00 * New Site TOTAL $ 21,725.00 $260,700.00 ITEM CITY ATTORNA:YPROV~'~ TO-' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors ..erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement Areas into Service Level C for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. PREPARED BY: ~, Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT NO. 28309 INTO SERVICE LEVEL C (RATE LEVEL 1 ) FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. 3. Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement documents. BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, applications are reviewed regarding the acceptance of perimeter slope areas, residential street lighting, and the inclusion of additional subdivisions into existing TCSD maintenance programs. Energy costs for residential street lighting is provided through Service Level B and perimeter slope and landscape areas are maintained through Service Level C. For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, sixteen (16) residential tracts and the parcels within those tracts will be levied within the Service Level B Rates and Charges at 925.68 per parcel, as follows: r:\yasinobk\b&onew.99 062299 Tract No. 23220 Tract No. 23371-5 Tract No. 23371-6 Tract No. 23371-7 Tract No. 23371-9 Tract No. 23371-10 Tract No. 23371-11 Tract No. 23371-14 Tract No. 24182-1 Tract No. 24184-F Tract No. 24184-1 Tract No. 24185-1 Tract No. 24186-F Tract No. 24186-1 Tract No. 24186-2 Tract No. 24232 In addition, Regency Homes, Inc. has completed the necessary Proposition 218 proceedings for the transfer of perimeter landscaping within Tract No. 28309 into the TCSD maintenance program beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Located along Nicolas Road, the landscaping has been inspected and approved by the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. The proposed inclusion of this area in to Service Level C, Rate Level I will result in the annual levy of $46.00 per residential parcel within Tract No. 28309. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the aforementioned tracts and the parcels within those tracts into the appropriate service levels has been incorporated into the TCSD budgets for Service Level B and C for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution to accept certain tracts into Service Level B. Resolution to accept certain slopes into Service Level C r: \yaainobk\b&ca~v/. 99 062299 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows: A. The Temecula Community Services District has assumed costs associated with energizing the street lighting within the following residential Tracts No.: Tract No. 23220 Tract No. 23371-5 Tract No. 23371-6 Tract No. 23371-7 Tract No. 23371-9 Tract No. 23371-10 Tract No. 23371-11 Tract No. 23371-14 Tract No. 24182-1 Tract No. 24184-F Tract No. 24184-1 Tract No. 24185 - 1 Tract No. 24186-F Tract No. 24186-1 Tract No. 24186-2 Tract No. 24232 B. The Temecula Community Services District is currently providing residential street lighting services through Service Level B; and C. The Temecula Community Services District is the authorized legislative body to accept the responsibility of energizing residential street lights within the City of Temecula. Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District hereby accepts the aforementioned residential tracts into the Service Level B rate level for residemial street lighting services beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 3. The Secretary shall certi~r to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 22nd of June, 1999. Jeff Comerchero, President r:\yasinobk\b&~now.99 062299 ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: ABSTAIN: DIRECTORS: r: \ytsinobk\b&enew.99 062299 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WITFIIN TRACT NO. 28309 INTO SERVICE LEVEL C (RATE LEVEL 1) FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows: A. The conditions of approval for Tract Map No. 28309 (Regency Homes, Inc.) required the developer to improve the perimeter slopes and landscaping as part of the overall subdivision improvements; and, B. That the offer of dedication was made on Final Map No. 28309, recorded on June 30, 1997; and, C. The annual parcel charges for perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance services were established by the majority of the property owners of Tract Map No. 28309 voting at an election held on December 12, 1997 and in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218; and, D. The Temecula Community Services District is the existing authorized legislative body authorized to provide maintenance of perimeter slope and landscape areas within the aforementioned developments. Section 2. hereby accepts: The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District A. The offer of dedication for the improved slopes and perimeter landscaping within Tract No. 28309; and B. The inclusion of said area into the Service Level C rate level for maintenance purposes beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated into this resolution by reference. Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 22nd of June, 1999. r:\yasinobk\b&cn~v.99 062299 Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: DIRECTORS: r:\yasinobk\b&enew.99 062299 EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP FOR TCSD PERIMETER SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS - TRACT NO. 28309 More particularly described as a 5.00 foot easement strip for slope and landscape maintenance purposes over lot numbers 1, and 34 through 46, of Tract No. 28309 as shown on map filed in Book 263, pages 55 through 59 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, State of California, on June 30, 1997 (No. 231254). TCSD Maintenance Area . g ~ 'A' MI~ ~ ~ ~ a t)~ ", ~ ~ ~ '" ~ . r:\yasinobk\b&cnew.99 062299 ITEM 4 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY ~/~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-00 PREPARED BY: Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors: Award a two (2) year contract to Self's Janitorial Service to provide park and facility restroom maintenance services in the amount not to exceed ~41,400 for Fiscal Year 1999-00. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Park Restroom Maintenance Services in April 1999. The TCSD received six (6) proposals, which were evaluated to determine qualifications and to assess the competitiveness of their pricing. Self's Janitorial Service was determined to be the lowest qualified bidder for the required services. The contract will provide restroom maintenance services for existing City maintained restrooms and will allow the addition of future sites as they come on line during the term of the contract. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Self's Janitorial Service for FY 1999-00 is $41 ,400.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD and the Public Works Annual Operating Budgets for FY 1999-00 in accounts: 190-180-999-5250 001-164-603-5250 Attachments: 1 ) 2) Agreement Cost per Unit Comparison \\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGKXAGENDA. RPTXSELFS JANI SERV-99-00 CONTRACT. DOC Restroom Maintenance Contract Request for Proposal Results (Cost per Unit Comparison) Self's Janitorial A Woman's Touch Custom Service Systems Bechtel Property Management L & G Property Maintenance Barrera Janitorial 9210.00 9221.00 9290.00 9338.00 9576.33 9694.00 R:\HARRINGKXAGENDA.RPT',SELFS JANI SERV-99-00 CONTRACT. DOC CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RESTROOM MAINTENANCE THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of June 22 ,1999, between the Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("City") and Self's Janitorial Service ("Contractor'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1999, and shall remain and continue in effect until June 30 ,2001, with two (2) one year renewals at the sole option of the City, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual services performed. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and the schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Eighty Two Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($ 82,800.00 ) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the Board of Directors. c. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT%Selrs Janitorial 6-99.doc 1 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 6. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR. a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. R:~-IARRINGK~GREEMNT~SelrS Janitodal 6-99.doc 2 With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and exped witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT~Selrs Janitorial 6-99.doc 3 (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~SelFs Janitonal 6-99.doc 4 work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor"s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City's prior written authorization. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMN~Self's Jamtonal 6-99.doc 5 a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Contractor: Self's Janitorial Service 332 W. 2"d Street Perris, CA 92370 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. R:~HARRINGk'~AGREEMN~SelFs Janitorial 6-99.doc 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) R:\HARRINGIGAGREEMN'I'~Self's Janitorial 6-99.doc 7 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED SCOPE OF WORK Lock all facilities between 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM Clean and stock all facilities between the hours of 10:00PM and 6:00AM. Record and submit daily maintenance activities, vandalism, and graffiti on Restroom Maintenance Checklist {Exhibit E) form to the City's Maintenance Supervisor or other designated person. Keep and provide records as required by City representative. Provide all necessary equipment, tools, chemicals, supplies, etc. necessary to perform specified work. City to provide all paper products (toilet paper, seat covers, paper towels). Submit request for products weekly. Perform all activities in a safe manner per OSHA's requirements, utilizing all personal safety items required to prevent accidents, illness or injury to maintenance personnel and the public. SPECIFICATIONS FOR CLEANING AND STOCKING FACILITY * Sweep restrooms and remove litter from interior and exterior of building (6' walkway around restroom building). * Empty interior trash containers and replace liners (washout containers and clean receptacles). * Scrub and sanitize toilets and lavatories. * Wipe down all fixtures, removing water, dirt, stains and any other incongruous substance. ** Wash (hose out) floors. Squeegee excess water out of building and off of hardscape. Remove any paper or other trash accumulated from this procedure. * Remove dirt, stains, or other debris on wall, ceilings, and light fixtures. * Stock all toilet paper, or other paper products. All dispenser to be filled daily. * Remove minor graffiti from building interior. Record on report form both graffiti removed, as well as graffiti that you were unable to remove. *** Pressure wash floors and walls. FREQUENCY: * Items to be performed daily. (Monday through Sunday) ** Items to be performed Mondays and Fridays *** Items to be performed monthly. NOTE: The specifications are minimum requirements for the maintenance of City restroom facilities. The restrooms shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and sanitary condition on a daily basis. Some situations may require additional work to be performed to insure the health and safety of the public. No additional compensation will be given for such work. No unsafe condition shall be left without notification of City's authorized representative. R:\HARRINGK'~AGREEMNT~Seli"s Janitorial 6-99.doc 8 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE SITE Sam Hicks Monument Park Butterfield Stage Park Winchester Creek Park Rancho California Sports Park (Rancho Vista fields) Rancho California Sports Park (North/South Fields) Rancho California Sports Park (Skate Park) Paloma Del Sol Park Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park Pala Community Park Margarita Community Park 6th Street Parking Lot Temecula Elementary School Pool ADDRESS 41970 Moreno Road 33654 De Portota Road 39950 Margarita Road 30875 Rancho Vista Rd 42775 Margarita Road 42569 Margarita Road 32099 De Portola Road 31465 Via Cordoba 44900 Temecuia Lane 29119 Margarita Road 41952 Front Street 41951 Moraga Road PRICE PER MONTH $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 $210.00 PRICE PER YEAR $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 $2 520.00 TOTAL PRICE $2,520.00 $30,240.00 ADDITIONAL SITES TO BE ADDED DURING THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT Temecula Duck Pond Temecula Valley High School Restroom Temeku Hills Sports Park (2 restrooms) ADDRESS 28250 Rancho Caiif. Rd. 31555 Rancho Vista Rd. La Serena & Meadows TOTAL PRICE ADDITIONAL SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK Butterfield Stage Park Maintain holding tank per manufacturer, Clivus Multrum, Inc., see Exhibit D PRICE PER PRICE PER MONTH YEAR $210.00 $2,520.00 $210.00 $2,520.00 $420.00 $5,040.00 $840.00 $10,080.00 PRICE PER PRICE PER MONTH YEAR $90.00 $1,080.00 TOTAL PRICE $3,450.00 $41,400.00 Payments shall be made monthly for actual services performed in the amount not to exceed: $3,450.00 R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNTSelFs Janitonal 6-99.doc 9 ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, Acting General Manager Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Director of Support Services June 22, 1999 Ratification of Election Results -Tract No. 23143 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-.._ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL4N BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 2, 1999 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW BACKGROUND: At the meeting of Apdl 13, 1999, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. CSD 99-05, which called for a Special Election to be held among the property owners of the parcels within Tract No. 23143. The purpose of this election was to establish Service Level B, Service Levd C and Service Level D rates and charges for fiscal year 2000-01. This election was conducted by mail with a final date for acceptance of ballots to be no later than 3:30 p.m. on June 2, 1999. At 4:00 p.m. on that date, the City Clerk acting in her capacity as the City's Election Official and as the Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District declared the receipt pedod for receiving ballots closed. At 4:00 p.m., the Elections Canvassing Board duly appointed and consisting of Deputy City Clerk Michaela A. Ballreich, Administrative Secretary Cheryl Domenoe and Records Coordinator Gwyn Flores, conducted the canvass of the results. The results of the votes cast, returned within the time allowed and publicly counted, are included within the body of the proposed resolution. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution ratifying the results of this election. Ageride Report~ CSD Tract 23143 1 FISCAL IMPACT: election results. ATTACHMENTS: There is no direct fiscal impact as · consequence of the ratification of the Resolution No. CSD 99- Off'mial Tally of the Votes Ageede Repodl~:bdio~ CSD Tied 23143 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTCe.8 OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL4N BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 2, 1999 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a Special MaiNn Ballot Election was held and conducted in the City of Temecula, California, on June 2, 1999, as required by law;, and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in tim, form and manner as provided by law;, that~hepep~seofthespecla~elec~ionwasforthepuq}~seof~btaii~ppmv~bypr~perty~wners within Tract No. 23143 was properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects lhe election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. CSD 99.05, adopted April 13, 1999, the ballots were returned to the oilroe of the City Cierk/Seoretary of the Temecula Community Services District; the msulta were mc/ved, canvassed in public and are herein set forth in Section 2. NOW THEREFORE, THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOE8 RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the homeowne~ election was one (1) and the whole number of provisional baliota cast in the election was none (0). Seotion 2. That the whole number of baliota cast was one (1) for establishment of the annual levy for Service Level B rates and charges at $25.68/per lot and Service Level C rates and charges at $1 75.(X)/per lot on the parcel identified on the ballot were as follows: yes No Inoomplete Future 1,026 residential parcels within Tract No. 23143 and its subsequent phases, ft.lh~ identified as a resulxlivlaion of Parcel IVlp 22429 Under ownership of Thomas D. Pomeroy, President ~ None None RmaoLCSDX99- I Sel}Ut}n 3. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Commun~ Services District does declare and detemr~that as a resultof the eteclion, a majority of the voters voting on the measure relating to the establishment of Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rat, and C, harges for Fiscal Year 200001 pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution, did vote in favor of the measure and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and mUfied. Se,~don 4. The City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) shell enter in the minutes of the TCSD Board of Directors, a statement of the result of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the C, lty; (2) The votes in favor, (3) The votes in opposition and (4) Those received incomplete. Se,~on 5. The C. ity C4erk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999. A'I'rEST: Jeff Comerchem, President Susan W. Jones, CIVIC [SEAL] STATE OF CAUFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following roll call vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISTRICT MEMBERS: DISTRICT MEMBERS: DISTRICT MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC C, ity Clerk/District Secretary OFFICIAL TALLY OF TIIE VOTES FOR TCSD LEVY/SPECIAL TAX FY 2000/01 - TRACt 23143 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TRACT TO BE ACCEPTED INTO SERVICE LF~VEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES Ye.s N._fi TOTAL TOTAL ELECTION BOARD Election Officer Cheryi Do~enoe, Election Officer Gwy~n' ~r~es,~!ection OffiCer R:~ELECTION - GENERAL~ANVASS.DOC ITEM 6 APPROV~~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER TO,' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors ---~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FisCal Year 1999-2000 PREPARED BY: RECO MMEN DATIO N: eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- 2. Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D - RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same as those of the City of Temecula. R:\ynsinobk\tesdl~v3~.99 062299 Property owners pay only for the TCSD services that they actually receive through separate rates and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Street Lighting Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Although the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a cooperative agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax will be considered by the City Council on June 22, 1999. As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels: Service Level B- Residential Street LiQhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of residential street lighting. Service Level C - Perimeter LandscaoinQ and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for single family residences. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that receive street lighting services. The proposed rate of ~25.68 per property owner has not been increased from last fiscal year. Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Rate C-1: $ 46.00 Rate C-2: ~ 89.00 Rate C-3: ~ 116.00 Rate C-4: $175.00 Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family residential properties in the City of Temecula. For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, the rate and charge is proposed to be ~172.56, and increase of ~1.92 from last year. This is due to an increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Service Level "R" includes only those parcels which receive services for the maintenance of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this service level will not increase from last year. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are identified as follows: Residential Rate R-l: Vacant Rate R-l: $115.26 ~ 57.64 R:\yaainobk\tcsdlcvy.cad 061698 Residential Rate R-2: Vacant Rate R-2: ,~121.92 60.96 The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only those property owners who receive services from a particular service level pay for those services· In summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will receive an increase of $1.92 in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1999-00. The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is ~3,211,051. The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund slope maintenance; residential street lighting; recycling and refuse collection services; and streets and road maintenance in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. CSD 99- Service Levels B, C, and D. Resolution No. CSD 99- Service Level R. Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000· R:\yasinobk\te~llovy.99 062299 RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D - RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, slope maintenance, and recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection. Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD. r:\yasinobk\tesdreso. 99 062299 Section 5. On June 22, 1999, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates and charges. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, slope maintenance, and recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 8. The TCSD shah collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 483 1. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shah not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner' s property for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner' s property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program. Section 10. ffa property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1999, the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not r:\yasinobk\t~droso.99 062299 exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor, Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 22nd day of June, 1999. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: AB SENT: DIRECTORS: r:\yasinobk\tesdre~o.99 062299 EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVELS B, C, AND D On July 1, 1998, MuniFinaneial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq. the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific senrice level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level, as follows: Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse Collection. Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operations and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. r:\ya~inobk\t~!r~o.99 062299 The Financial Analysis contained herein includes Service Levels B, C, and D with their total levy budgets for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to be as follows: SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET Service Level B $ 321,899.00 Service Level C $ 559,842.00 Service Level D $2,3 17,653.00 RATE LEVEL PARCEL CHARGE N/A $ 25.68 C-1 $ 46.00 C-2 $ 89.00 C-3 $116.00 C-4 $175.00 $172.56 TOTAL TCSD LEVY FOR SERVICE LEVELS B, C, ANDD: $3,199,394.00 r: \yasinobk\t~sdre,o.99 062299 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has presetibed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the maintenance of streets and roads for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report CKeport") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Keport contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection. Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public heating was mailed and published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD. Section 5. On June 22, 1999, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public heating, the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested r:\yasiaobk\t~sdr~o.99 062299 person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates and charges. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the rates and charges for the street and road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 483 1. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner' s property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program. Section 10. Ira property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1999, the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, r:\yasinobk\tcsdreso.99 062299 authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 22na day of June, 1999. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Distdct Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS r: \yasinobk\t~dre~o.99 062299 EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL R On July 1, 1998, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level, as follows: Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads. The Financial Analysis contained herein includes the Service Level R total levy budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to be as follows: SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET RATE LEVEL PARCEL CHARGE Service Level R TOTAL TCSD LEVY FOR SERVICE LEVEL R: $11,657.00 $11,657.00 R-1 Improved $115.26 R-1 Unimproved $ 57.64 R-2 Improved $121.92 R-2 Unimproved $ 60.96 r:\yaalnobk\t~sdm.99 062299 CITY OF TEMECULA _ ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT Temecula Community Services District TCSD Fiscal Year 1999~2000 INTENT MEETING: PUBLIC HEARING: May 11,1999 June 22,1999 Corporate Office 28765 Single Oak Drive Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) Fax: (909) 699-3460 /14BIA /HUNIFINANCIAL www.muni.com Regional Offices Jacksonville, FL · Kansas City, MO · Sacramento · San Francisco · Seattle, WA · Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 PLANS AND SPECIFIACTIONS .............................................................................3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES ........................................... 3 BUDGET AND LEVY SUMMARY ...................................................................................3 DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGE~ ...........................................................................5 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ................................................................................9 A. RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 1999/2000) .............................9 B. MODIFICA ONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 ................................. 9 TI IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS ............................................................................................12 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ..........................................................................15 APPENDIX A -- 1999~2000 COLLECTION ROLL .......................................................17 INTRODUCTION Upon incorporation of the City-of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the District. The District collects property-related fees and charges (Charges) in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law"). Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the Di trict and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in 'thee Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel. The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance (Service Level R) services furnished by the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765,6, inclusive. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rates and Charges for the parcels and territories within the District. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an · opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and ~ review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 1999~2000. II. PLANS AND SPECIFIACTIONS General Description of th~ District and Services The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Residential Street Lighting · Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance · Refuse Collection · Road Improvement and Maintenance Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment. 3 ii C: 0 LU 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 .~ ~ f- ._~ ::3 .c: C: 0 e-. e- .c: e- Z C. District Services and Charges Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting -- includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. Service Level B Tracts 11087-01 20079-00 2088~00 21674-00 22761-00 23267-00 24134-00 11087-02 20079-01 20882-00 21674-01 22762-00 23267-01 24134-01 12189-01 20079-02 20882-01 21674-02 22786-00 23267-02 24134-02 12189-02 20079-03 20882-02 21674-03 22915-00 23267-03 24134-03 12189-03 20130-00 20882-03 21675-00 22915-01 23267-04 24135-00 12189-04 20130-01 20987-00 21675-01 22915-02 23371-01 24135-01 12189-05 20130-02 21067-00 21675-02 22915-03 23371-02 24135-02 12189-06 20130-03 21082-00 21675-03 22916-00 23371-03 24135-03 12189-07 20130-04 21082-01 21675-04 22916-01 23371-04 24182-01 13060-01 20130-05 21082-02 21675-05 22916-02 23371-05 24184-01 13060-02 20130-06 21082-03 21675-06 22916-03 23371-06 24184-F 13060-03 20153-00 21082-04 21760-00 22962-00 23371-07 24185-01 13060-04 20154-00 21340-00 21765-00 23100-01 23371-09 24186-01 13060-05 20319-00 21340-01 21818-00 23100-02 23371-10 24186-02 13060-06 20643-00 21340-02 22148-00 23100-03 23371-11 24186-F 13060-07 20644-00 21340-03 22203-00 23100-04 23371-14 24232-00 13060-08 20703-01 21340-04 22204-00 23100-05 23483-00 25004-01 18518-00 20703-02 21340-05 22208-00 23101-01 24131-00 27827-00 18518-01 20703-03 21340-06 22593-00 23101-02 24131-01 27827-01 18518-02 20735-01 21340-07 22593-01 23101-04 24131-02 27827-02 18518-03 20735-02 21430-01 22593-02 23125-00 24131-03 27827-03 18583-00 20735-03 21561-00 22627-00 23125-01 24132-00 28309-00 19872-00 20735-04 21672-01 22627-01 23125-02 24132-01 19872-01 20735-05 21672-02 22715-00 23125-03 24133-00 19872-02 20735-06 21672-03 22715-01 23126-00 24133-01 19872-03 20735-07 21672-04 22715-02 23128-00 24133-02 19872-04 20735-08 21673-00 22716-00 23142-00 24133-03 19872-05 20735-09 21673-01 22716-01 23177-00 24133-04 19939-00 20848-00 21673-02 22716-02 23220-00 24133-05 19939-01 20879-00 21673-03 22716-03 19939-02 20879-01 22716-04 5 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance -- includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeteF landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required within these tracts and subdivisions vary depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rate levels have been established within Service Level C. The rate and charges for.each of the four service levels in Service Level C are as follows: · C-1 is currently charged $46.00 · C-2 is currently charged $89.00 · C-3 is currently charged $116.00 · C-4 is currently charged $175.00 The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. Tract Name PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT Service Level C Tracts Rate Level C-1 Tract Numbers 23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-02 26861-03 22593-00 22593-01 20879-00 20879-01 RANCHO SOLANA THE VINEYARDS 26861-01 22593-02 MONTE VISTA 28309-00 6 Tract Name MORRISON HOMES RIDGEVIEW WINCHESTER CREEK WOODCREST COUNTRY Tract Name o ylARTINIQUE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SADDLEWOOD VINTAGE HILLS 22148-00 Rate Level C-2 Tract Numbers 20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00 20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06 21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06 21340-07 21561-00 22208-00 Rate Level C-3 Tract Numbers 23128-00 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00 18518-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03 22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01 22916-02 22916-03 Tract Name BARCLEY ESTATES MEADOW VIEW SIGNET SERIES TRADEWI N DS VILLAGE GROVE Rate Level C-4 Tract Numbers 25004-01 21765-00 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02 21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01 21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06 7 Service Level D, Refuse Collection -- provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. The current rate and cha~'~es for Service Level D is $172.56 per single family residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate and charges for this service after conducting an additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and charges. Service Level R, Roads -- provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re- grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level R. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy- five (75) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-six (56) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 8 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes or exlgansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the District that affect the levy are outlined in the following. A. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to I 999~2000) On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. · Community Services, Parks, and Recreation -- that provided for the maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation · ,, services within the City. Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians -- that provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along arterial streets. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced by the Special Tax and no longer charged through the District. B. Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year '1999~2000 The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 is related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new single family residential unit is identified. Service Level B Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include the 1,068 residential parcels within-the following Tracts: Tract Number Tract Number Tract Number Number of Parcels Number of Parcels Number of Parcels 23371-05 74 23371-11 112 24185-01 109 23371-06 28 23371-14 24 24186-01 187 23371-07 45 24182-01 95 24186-02 51 23371-09 67 24184-01 79 24186-02 115 23371-10 25 24184-F 57 As of the Intent Meeting on May 11, 1999, the new Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for the individual residential parcels and lots within several of the above referenced tracts have not been identified from currently available Assessor's secured roll information. For purposes of this report, the APN's currently identified on the secured roll for these tracts are charged for Service Level B based on the number of residential lots and parcels to be created within those tracts. The following is a list of the Tracts and their corresponding APN's currently identified: Tract Number · 23371-07 · 23371-09 · 23371-10 · 23371-11 · 23371-14 · 24182-01 · 24184-01 · 24184-F · 24186-F Current APN's 953-340-002 953-350-006 and Portion of 953-050-020 Portion of 953-050-020 Portion of 953-050-020 953-350-008 Portion of 950-020-021 and 950-020-022: (These two APN's will also be subdivided into Tracts 24182-02 and 24182-03) Portion of 950-020-013 and 950-020-014 Portion of 950-020-013 and 950-020-014 950-020-047 The new APN's for each of the individual residential lots for these tracts should be established by the time the levy is submitted to the County for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. The Service Level B rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by the Board for inclusion. 10 . / Service Level C Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 are identified in the following. · Rate level #1 --Tract 28309-00 (46 residential parcels). ° Rate level #2 -- No New Tracts. ° Rate level # 3 -- No New Tracts. ° Rate level # 4 -- No New Tracts. All Service Level C rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by the Board for inclusion. Service Level D A total of 351 new developed residential parcels have been added to Service Level D (Refuse Collection) for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. New single family residential units are identified each year and included in Service Level D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and the waste hauler's updated service records. The actual cost per household last year for this service was $170.64. For Fiscal Year 1999/2000, the rate and charge is proposed to be $172.56, an increase of $1.92 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R). Service Level R There are no new Inclusions to Service Level R (Roads), proposed for the current fiscal year. However, sixteen (16) parcels have been removed from Service Level R-l, as this service is no longer provided to these parcels. The sixteen parcel removed from Service Level R-1 for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 are listed below. 957-130-001 957-130-006 957-130-016 957-150-009 957-130-002 957-130-007 957-130-017 957-150-017 957-130-003 957-130-013 957-130-020 957-150-018 957-130-004 957-130-015 957-150-005 957-340-008 11 DISTRICT BUDGETS The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. - - 1999~2000 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2000 BUDGET ITEM Account Level B I Level C Level D I Level R I Total ' No. 192 193 194 195 District PERSONNEL SERV1CES Salaries and Wages 5100 $0 $104,847 $27,337 $0 $132,184 Deferred Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0 PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0 State Unerrl:doyment 5103 0 0 0 0 0 MecJicaJW FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0 Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0 Unemployment Training Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0 Disability Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0 Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0 Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0 Terrfporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0 Part-'lirne (Project) 5119 0 8,476 0 0 8,476 Overtime Wages 5121 0 700 0 0 700 Subtotal (Personnel Services) $0 $114,023 $27,337 $0 $141,360 12 1999/2000 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Gommunity Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2000 ~ No. 192 193 194 195 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Telephone Service (Cellular) 5208 $0 $0 $0 $0 Repair & Maint. - Facilities 5212 0 53,225 0 0 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 0 0 0 0 Repair & Maint.-Office Equipment 5217 0 0 0 0 Maintenance Supplies ~218 0 0 0 0 Office Supplies 5220 0 0 O 0 Pdnting 5222 0 0 0 0 Legal Documents/Maps 5224 0 0 0 0 Eledjon Costs (Offset by developer deposits) 5225 1,600 1,000 0 0 Dues and Memberships 5226 0 0 2,610 0 Publications 5228 0 0 0 0 Postagqland Packaging 5230 0 0 0 0 Pmpedy Tax Adrnin Fees 5231 1,500 850 1,800 80 Rent - Fadlities 5234 0 0 0 0 Rent - Equipment 5238 0 0 0 0 Equipment Lease 5239 0 0 0 0 Utilities 5240 0 140,600 0 0 Small tools/Equipment 5242 0 0 0 0 Uniforms 5243 0 0 0 0 Signs 5244 0 0 0 0 Legal Services 5240 0 0 0 0 Consulting Services 5248 0 20,000 0 0 Other Outside Services 5250 0 0 0 0 Advertising 5254 0 0 1,500 0 Public Notices 5250 4,600 2, 100 5,200 0 Conferences 5238 0 0 0 0 Professional Meetings 5260 0 0 0 0 Staff Training/Education 5261 0 0 0 0 Mileage 5262 0 0 0 0 Fuel Expense. City Vehicles 5263 0 0 0 0 Coundl Discretionary 5267 0 0 0 0 Blueprints 5238 0 0 0 0 Subtotal (5200's) $7,100 $217,775 $11,110 $80 Total Dtstrlct $0 53.225 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,600 2,610 0 0 4,230 0 0 0 140,600 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 1,500 11,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $236,66S 13 1999~2000 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Gommunity Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2000 } No. 192 193 194 195 District OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Recreation Supplies 5301 $0 $0 $0 $6 $0 Waste Hauling 5315 0 0 2,317,653 0 2,317,653 Street Lighting 5319 323,000 0 0 0 323,000 Insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 7335 0 0 0 0 0 Information Systems 5340 0 0 0 0 0 Support Sewices 5345 0 0 0 0 0 Fadlities 5350 0 0 0 0 0 Assessment Engineering 5370 0 0 0 0 0 Refund of Pdor Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0 City0Ad~in Charges 5380 0 0 0 0 0 Subl~tals (5300's) $323,000 $0 $2,317,653 $0 $2,640,653 Operating Expenses 5400 0 0 ~ 0 0 Emergencey Road Maintenance 5402 0 0 0 17,077 Landscape Maintenance 5415 0 297,900 0 0 Landscape Rehabilitation 5416 0 0 0 0 Subtotals (5400's) $0 $297,900 $0 $11,077 0 17,077 297,900 0 $314,977 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS $330,700 $629,698 $2,353,100 $17,157 $3,333,655 EXPENDITURES RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS 330,700 629,698 2,356,100 17,157 3,333,655 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $330,700 $629,698 $2,356,100 $17,157 $3,333,656 REVENUES OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 8,801 35.000 14,000 500 58,301 FUND BALANCE 0 34,856 24,447 5,000 64,303 BALANCE TO LEVY 321,899 559,942 2,311,653 11,657 3,211,051 TOTAL REVENUES $330,700 $629,698 $2,356,100 $17,157 $3,333,655 14 VIi METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by the per parcel method. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse): Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. . I Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units -- 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) -- Parcel Charge The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level. PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B JParcel Property Type Unit Single Family Residential ~ 1.00 Single Family Vacant 1.00 lCharge per XParcel $25.68 $25.68 ParcelCharge r Multiplier ~$25.68 l Per Parcel $25.68 Per Parcel 15 PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Parcel Property Type Unit Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00 ~ingle Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 $46.00 89.00 116.00 $175.00 Parcel ~ Charge Multiplier $46.00 Per Parcel 89.00 Per Parcel 116.00 Per Parcel $175.00 Per Parcel PARCEL CHAliCE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Property Type ~;ingle Family Residential Parcel Charge per Unit X Parcel 1.00 ~ $172.56 Parcel Charge Multiplier )$172.56 1 Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R IParcel Property Type Unit Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 I Charge X per Unit $115.26 115.26 121.92 $121.92 = I Parcel Charge I Multiplier $115.26 Per Parcel 57.64 Per Parcel 121,92 Per Parcel $60.96 Per Parcel 16 Appendix A -- 199912000 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's rn'~fp for the year in which this report is prepared. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the C~ity Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. 17 ITEM 7 TY ATTORNAEPYPROV~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of Directors ~-~~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 Temecula Valley Museum, Interior Exhibit Design RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve in its substantial form the interior exhibit design concepts for the Temecula Valley Museum. BACKGROUND: In October, 1998 the Temecula City Council awarded a Consultant Services Agreement to Think, Jacobson and Roth, a Los Angeles based firm, to develop a conceptual designs of intedor exhibits, fabricate the exhibits and install the exhibits at the Temecula Valley Museum. A design committee was formed which consisted of Council Member Jeff Comerchero, Council Member Ron Roberts, Community Services Commissioner Tom Edwards, representatives from Temecula Valley Museum, Inc., Pechanga and City staff. The committee's goal was to work with our consultant to develop a plan for the interior exhibits of the museum. Three meetings were publicly noticed and held regarding the design of the exhibit area, with input from those in attendance and committee members. The consultant's developed a story line, .which portrays Temecula's rich historic past and exhibit concepts, which the committee has reviewed and approved. On June 14, 1999, the Community Services Commission reviewed and approved the interior exhibit designs as well. For tonight's meeting, Lori Jacobson and Carla Roth of Think, Jacobson and Roth, are here to present the committee's final concepts to be developed and installed in our new museum. This item requests the Board's approval of the intedor exhibit area. With approval of the Board of Directors fabrication and installation of the exhibits will begin. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the conceptual designs of the interior exhibits will have no additional fiscal impact. R:~,IOLERO~PORI1TVMI Exhibit D~siZn.doc II THE LAND OWNERS ~rom the ~79os through the late ~8oos a series ofvery significant changes in control or ownership of Temecula Valley lands occurred. The native Temecula Indians' daily life, manner of producing food, and religious system was forever changed with the rounding of the nearby San Luis Rey Mission in ~798. Less than four decades later, in ~835, both the missions and local Indians were greatly impacted when the Mexican government secularized, or sectioned off for settlement, all California mission lands. Then in ~848, at the end of the Mexican War, control of all of California and most of the present day Southwest was transferred to the United States. The struggles for control did not end there. For more than 75 years after the arrival of the first Europeans in the Valley, the native Temecula Indians were !argel'y able to remain on the lands they had occupied for centuries. In September ~875, however, this ended with the delivery of an eviction notice to the nearly 4oo occupants of the Temecula Indian village. Introductory Text Pane[ 21" wide x 24" high ITEM 8 CITY DIR. CITY APPROVAL ATTORNEY OF FINANCE MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT 8oard of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, Acting General Manager June 22, 1999 Review and Approval of the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DISCUSSION: The proposed FY 1999-00 TCSD operating budget includes the operation and maintenance of district-wide parks and recreation facilities, debt service on the certificates of participation issued for the construction of the Community Recreation Center, artedal street lighting and traffic signals, and median landscaping. Rates and charges are also established for residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and road construction and maintenance. Parks and recreation services, as well as artedal street lighting and traffic signals, and median landscaping are pdmadly funded by the special tax assessed to property owners as approved by the voters as 'Measure C" in March, 1997. The maximum level of special tax that was approved by the voters is $74.44 per single-family dwelling unit. Over the past two years the special tax rate has been reduced to $68.44 per dwelling unit, with the $6.00 per dwelling unit difference being funded by the City's General Fund through the Revenue Excess Shadng for Temecula ("REST") program. The proposed FY 1999-00 budget reflects no change in the existing special tax rate. This special tax will result in projected revenues of $2,592,190. Residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and road construction and maintenance services provided by the TCSD are funded pdmadly by rates and charges assessed to property owners within the District. No changes are proposed in any of the service level rates and charges, other than a $1.92 per year increase in the Service Level "D" charge for refuse collection due to a Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment. The total revenue to be generated by these rates and charges is projected to be $3,203,810. As discussed above, the REST program contribution from the City's General Fund is proposed to be increased from the current level of $850,020 in FY 1998-99 to $1,176,000 in FY 1999-00 (an increase of $325,980). The operating budget for the TCSD totals $7,957,230 (a $289,576 or 3.8% increase from FY 1998- 99), and by fund is as follows: Parks and Recreation Service Level "A" (Adedal Street Lighting) Service Level "B" (Residential Street Lighting) Service Level "C" (Slope Maintenance) Service Level "D" (Refuse Hauling) Service Level "R" (Street and Road Maintenance) Debt Service Total $ 3,826,650 298,390 335,700 630,100 2,348,960 17,160 500.270 $ 7,957230 PARKS AND RECREATION The proposed FY 1999-00 Parks and Recreation budget reflects an increase of $209,162 (5.8%) from the current fiscal year, due primarily to the following: · Operations and maintenance costs for three new park fadlities: Winchester Creek Park, Margarita Community Park, and Temeku Hills Park · Operations and maintenance costs for the Temecula Valley Museum ($153,790 annually) · $42,500 in funding for the Ads Coundl to support the implementation of the Cultural Arts Master Plan SERVICE LEVEL "A" (ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING) The proposed FY 199900 Service Level "A" budget reflects an increase of $15,172 (5.4%) from the current fiscal year due pdmadly to additions to the City's adedal street lighting system. SERVICE LEVEL "B" (RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING) The proposed FY 1999-00 Service Level "B" budget reflects a $15,140 decrease (4.3%) from the current fiscal year due primarily to personnel cost reductions. SERVICE LEVEL 'C" (SLOPE MAINTENANCE) The proposed FY 1999-00 Service Level "C' budget reflects a $6,892 increase (1.1%) from the current fiscal year. SERVICE LEVEL "D" (REFUSE HAULING1 The proposed FY 1999-00 Service Level "It budget reflects a $71,270 increase (3.1%) from the current fiscal year due to an increase in the number of parcels receiving benefit. 2 SERVICE LEVEL 'R" (STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE) The proposed FY 199900 Service Level "R" budget reflects a $3,930 increase (29.7%) from the current fiscal year due to an increase in the number of parcels receiving benefit. FISCAL IMPACT: The services provided by the District are funded pdmadly by the special tax that was approved by the voters as Measure C in March, 1997, as wall as by the rates and charges assessed to property owners which were approved during a public hearing held on June 22, 1999. Attachments: Resolution No. CSD 99-__ Proposed FY 1999-00 Operating Budget RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING ~ FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLIStlING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District has reviewed the proposed final FY 1999-00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District as follows: Section 1. That the FY 1999-00 TCSD operating budget is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the General Manager. C. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnd positions above the level indicated in the final budget. The General Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of Directors action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the General Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Board of Directors action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in mounts up to project contingency established by the Board. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the District books at June 30, 1999 are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 1999-00. Section 4. The Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22"a day ofhne, 1999. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC District Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIYORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22~d day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC District Secretary/City Clerk PROPOSED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET- FY 1999-00 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT City of Temecula REFENUES BY FUND - CO,~!,~!UNITY SERtqCES DISTRICT Actual Actual FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 Parks and Recreation $ 3,359,968 $ 3,565,438 $ Service Level A 196,788 222,620 Service Level B 273,242 281,122 Service Level C 535,273 586,656 Service Level D 1,868,205 2,071,042 Service Level R 19,220 19,354 Debt Service * 36,487 36,010 Total $ 6,289, 183 $ 6,782,242 $ Estimated FY 1998-99 3,632,610 281,800 313,840 591,180 2,277,690 12,880 35,600 7, 145,600 Projeaed FY 1999410 4,119,060 297,530- 335,700 594,840 2,324,410 12,160 35,600 7,719,300 * Does not. include operating transfer from Parks and Recreation. FOUR YEAR COMPARISON $6,289,183 ] $6,782,242 ~ . $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 Actual FY 1996~7 Actual FY 1997~8 [] Parks and Recreation [] Service Level A · Service Level D I~! Service Level R Estimated FY 1998-99 r'l Service Level B · Debt Service Projected FY 1999-00 [] Service Level C EXPENDITURE ,~UAIJ/ARY BY CATEGORY- COIi/~!UNITY ,.~ERVICF~ DI~I'RICT' FFND$ Operations Fund Personnel & Maintenance Parks and R~creation* $ 1,578,870 $ 2,219,280 $ S~vice Level A 2,890 29~,500 Service Level B 335,700 S~vicc Level C 114,420 515,680 S~rvic¢ Level D 27,440 2,321,520 Setvic~ Level R 17,160 Debt Service 500.270 Total $ 1.723.620 $ 6.205.110 $ Capital Outlay 28,500 $ 28.500 S Operating Transfers Total 3,826,650 298,390 335,700 630,100 2,348,960 17,160 500,270 7.957.230 * Does not include $464,670 operating transfer to Ihe Debt S~'vice Fund. Service Level D (S2,34S,960 Service Level R ($13,230) Debt Service ($S00a70) Parks and Recreation (53,826,650) Service Level C / ($630,100) Service Levd B ($350,g40) ~._Service Level A (s298,39o) City of Temecula ' CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continued) Other Sources: Operating Transfers In LonR-terlTi Debt Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Uses: Operating Transfers Out Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) Expenditures and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999 Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 ' Designations: Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies Continuing Appropriation Debt Servi~e Reserves: Encumbrances Long-term Receivables Debt Service Um'eserved Fund Balance/Equily, June 30, 2000 Parks & Recreation $ 4, 119,060 $ 4, 119,060 (3,826,650) (464,670) Community. Services DialHa Service Service Level A Level B 29'~,530 $ 335,700 Service Levd C 594,840 297,530 335,700 594,840 (298,390) (335,700) (630,100) (172,260) (860) (35,260) 870.380 25,958 10,182 324,917 698,120 25,098 10,182 28~657 698,120 25,098 10,182 289,657 City of Temecula CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continuea) Sources: op~ti.s T~f~ 1. CommunHy Service Dbtrict Service Service Levd D Level R 2,324,410 S 12,160 $ Debt Service 3~,600 464,670 Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Uses: Operating Transfem Out Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) Expenditures and Olhcr Us~ Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999 Fund BalancedEquily, June 30, 2000 Designations: Economic Uncertainty/Comingencies Continuing Appropriations Debt Service Reserves: Encumbrances long-term Receivables Debt Service Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity, June 30. 2000 2,324,410 12, 160 500,270 (2,348,960) (17,160) (500,270) (24,550) (5,000) I g6.793 11.002 162,243 6,002 162,243 6,002 529.020 529,105 26,415 502,690 Ci .tv of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES I RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR OF COh/IMUN1TY SERVICES Herman D. Parker DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Phyllis Ruse - I I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I MAINTENANCE SERVICES -- Youth & Adult Sports -- Special Events -- Volunteer & Cultural Services -- Teen & Recreational Services -- Senior & Human Services -- Park Acquisition -- Park Development -- Assessment Administration -- Development Review -- Solid Waste Adminisu'ation -- Cable Television Franchise Administration -- Park Maintenance -- Median Maintenance -- Slope Maintenance -- Facility Maintenance C~ o./' Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES Funding Source: PARKS AND RECREATION* Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 1,124,006 1,628,368 22.846 ~'.775.220 Actual FY 1997-98 Special Tax Benefit Assessments General Fund Budgeted FY 1999-98 Proposed FY 1999-00 1,237,077 $ 1,467,120 $' 1,578,870 1,734,118 2,134,868 2,219,280 2.759 15,500 28,500 $ 3.617.488 $ $ 2.973.954 3.826.650 SERVICE LEVEL A Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total $ Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY1997-98 Budgeted FY 1999-98 2.678 $ 2,776 $ 2,850 194,303 208,890 280,368 196.981 $ 283.218 $ 211.666 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 2,890 295,500 $ 298.390 SERVICE LEVEL B Actual Exl~enditure Summary FY 1996-97 Personnel $ 6,839 Operations and Maintenance 280,124 Capital Outlay Total $ 286.963 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 6,839 292,816 $ 299.655 Budgeted FY 1999-98 $ '7,430 343,410 $ 350.840 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 335,700 $ 335.700 *Does not include operating transfers out. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERFICES SERVICE LEVEL C Actual Expenditure Summary. FY 1996-97 Personnel $ 113,930 Operations and Maintenance 440,037 Capital Outlay Total $ 553.967 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 92,441 435,837 $ 528.278 Budgeted FY 1999-98 $ 119,490 503,718 $ 623.208 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 114,420. 515,680 $ 630.100 SERVICE LEVEL D Actual Expenditure Summan.' FY 1996-97 Personnel $ 43,846 Operations and Maintenance 1.754, 111 Capital Outlay Total $ 1.797.957 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 39,736 2,080,080 $ 2.119.816 Budgeted FY 1999-98 $ 43,680 2,234,010 $ 2.277.690 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 27,440 2,321,520 $ 2.348.960 SERVICE LEVEL R Expenditure Summary Personnel. Opcrations and MaintCnancc Capital Outlay Total DEBT SERVICE Expenditure Summ'4n.' Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY 1997-98 Budgeted FY 1999-98 $ 9,940 $ 20,931 $ 13,230 $ 9.940 $ 20.93 1 $ 13.230 Actual FY 1996-97 $ 501,600 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 500,995 $ $ 500.995 $ $ 501.600 Budgeted FY 1999-98 501,980 501.980 Proposed FY1999-00 $ 17,160 $ 17.160 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 500,270 $ 500.270 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y - COMMUNITY SERFICES Personnel Allocation PARKS AND RECREATION Director of Community Services Deputy Director of Community Services Maintenance Superintendent Development Services Administrator Recreation Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Development Services Analyst Senior Landscape Inspector Museum Services Manager Recreation Supervisor Administrative Secretary Recreation Coordinator Landscape Inspector Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Custodian Total Authorized 1998-99 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.75 1.00 0.95 0.00 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.10 1.00 16.90 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 (0.25) 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.50 0.50 0.20 0.00 2.55 Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.80 1.00 0.70 0.20 0.50 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 0.25 1.50 1.50 2.30 1.00 19.45 SERVICE LEVEL A ~Development Services Analyst SERVICE LEVEL B Development Services 'Analyst Office Assistant Total 0.05 0.10 0.O5 0.15 0.00 (0.1 O) (0.05) (0.15) 0.05 ' . 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ci0, of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES' Personnel Allocation SERVICE LEVEL C Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Senior Landscape Inspector Development Services Analyst Landscape Inspector Office Assistant Total SERVICE LEVEL D Development Services Administrator Development Services AnalySt Office Assistant Total Community Sen'ices Total Authorized 1998-99 0.05 '0.05 0.60 '0.70 0.00 0.25 1.65 0.25 0.15 0.50 0.90 19.65 Changes 0.00 (0.05) (o.~o~ (0.10) 0.50 0.05 0.30 (0.05) 0.00 (0.40) (0.45) 2.25 Proposed 1999-00 '0.05 0.00 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.30 1.95 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.45 21.90 9 Ci.tv of Temecula DEPARTA4ENT SUMMARY- COAtAIUNITY SERVICES Program: Recreation Services MISSION: The Recreation Services Program is responsible for providing a comprehensive, Citywide recreation program that meets the recreation and human service nee~ls within the community. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Developed and implemented a marketing plan for the Citywide volunteer program.' · Increased the number of excursion opportunities offered to Temecula residents. · Developed and implemented a Citywide special events banner display program. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 3: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 4: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 5: OBJECTIVES: INCREASE THE 'NUMBER OF STAFF TRAININGS OR WORKSHOP OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PROJECT EMPLOYEES. Increase the number of staff trainings or workshop opporUmities by six (6). Training opportunities may include, but are not limited to, computer training, safety training, customer service training, etc. INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FAMILY ORIENTED PROGRAMS AT THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER. Increase the number of family oriented program opportunities at the Temecula Community Center by four (4). Programs may include, but are not limited to, Family Fun Nights, excursions, family barbecues, etc. EXPLORE POSSIBLE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AT THE PROMENADE MALL SCHEDULED TO OPEN NOVEMBER 1999. Determine the feasibility of providing City-sponsored recreation oppontmities at the Promenade Mall site. Opportunities may include, but are not limited to, Story Time for Kids, Musical Presentations, Art Exhibits, etc. IMPLEMENT THE "TEMECULA PRIDE" CAMPAIGN. Implement a comprehensive campaign that educates and encourages Temecula residents to respect, enjoy, and maintain their community. Special events, bumper stickers, special recognition awards are several suggested avenues for promotions. IMPLEMENT MUSEUM OPERATIONS AND SERVICES · :.Complete the fabrication and installation of exhibits and other interior amenities. · :.Hire a Museum Administrator. · :. Work with the Temecula Valley Museum to provide decent services and operate the museum for a determined number of hours per week. · :. Provide museum tours for school field trips. iO Ci .ty of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMlqAR Y- COA~MUNITY SER FICES Program: Recreation Services (Continued) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Numbc[ of staff trainings or workshop opportunities for all project staff Number of family oriented programs at the Temecula Com:nunity Center Number of recreational opportunities at the future Promenade Mall Nmnbcr of "Temecula Pride" campaign promotional materials PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 PROJECTED FY 1999/00 4 4 4 10 N/A N/A 2 4 N/A N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 2 4 11 City of Temecula DEPARTA4ENT SUA,tMARY- COAdMUNITY SERVICE Program: Development Services MISSION: The Development 5endces Program is responsible for parksite acquisition and development, a.~ssn~nt engineerin~ development review, and solid waste and cable television franchise administration. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Began construction of the Margarita Community Park sad Phase H of Temecula ' Duck Pond · Completed construction of Winchester Creek Park · Completed plans for the Santa C, ertrmtis Creek Trail · Hired an employee, through the City Clerk's department, who will assist the division in a pubic education program. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE AND BALANCED NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITH~S SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA. Complete construction of a school ballfield fighting project. Complete installation of new tot lot equipment and play surface at Rancho California Sports Park. · ~' Complete the design for lhe Senior Center Expansion Project. ,0, Complete the construction of the ~ court at ButWrfield S~age Park · ~, Condition development projects to provide parkland and recreational facilities that · meet City. standards. ' ' IMPLEMENT A COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-USE TRAILS MASTER PLAN. ~, Develop a Multi-Use Trails Master Pia~ ~ Complete construction of Santa Genredis unde~cwssing at Winchester Road. ,~ Accept easements from the Metropolitan Water District and other agencies for Waft uses. IMPLEMENT THE TEMECULA LIBRARY MASTER PLAN. Identify and secure funding for the consUuction of the library facility. Complete the construction documents for the libra~, and bid the project City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES Program: Development Serv/ces (Coatinuea) OBJECTIVES: MANAGE THE REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND INSPECT DEVELOPER AND CITY CONSTRUCTED PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES. Ensure that developer and City built pafa, trails and recreational projects are designed and constructed in accordance with City / TCSD standards. Train a tecimician to sssist in plan review and i~ion. Enimnce coordination between Community Services and other City deparUncnts during plan review and construction PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of new City parks and facilities Number of Msster Plans completed PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 1~ 1998/99 FY 1999/00 0 0 3 4 0 3 6 2 13 City of Temec~da D EPAR TA4ENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICE MISSION: The Maintenance 5errices Prograln is responsltle for providing effective landscape and filcility :naintenance services to ~ $1ope~, Ii~dian~ recreation facilities and City admini.~lltive of~ces. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Developed and implemented a service order request tvuaintemance system * Established an effecl~ve by managemeat system Provided o~-going ~ainln~ to 8taft oll the opetafioa of the City' s 8eClLrity system · Established a Citywide alarm monitoring system for fwe and security GOAL 1: PROVIDE SYSTEM. A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE FACILITY, PARK AND TRAIL OBJECTIVES: ~. Ensure performance compliance of the landscape mintenance contractors. ~. Develop pn'orities for site ~pairs, renovations and rehabilitation. DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM TO REHABILITATE AGING SLOPE AREAS. OBXECTIVES: GOAL3: Identify slope areas that are in need of rehabilitation_ Ou~ine the required rehabilitation needs of each area identified. Prioritize the implementation ~f the rehabilitation of each identified area. DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT 'A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR CITY PARKS AND FACHATIES. OBJECTIVES: Inventory and asses the current condition of sites to be included in the progra~ . Prioritize the implementation based on the immediate needs and budget limitations of each site. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Avenge number of days to complete general maintenance items Number of facility parking lots receiving annual preventative maintenance Number of slope areas renovated PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999100 N/A N/A 5 3 N/A N/A 2 3 N/A N/A 1 3 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNJTY SERVICE Program: Debt Service MISSION: The Debt Service Program is the operaling budget for the Temecula Community Services District Items budgeted include debt service principal and interest, property tax admini.sU'ativc fees, and pass-through agreements. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · All debt service and related costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation ~vere made in a timely manner GOAL 1: ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS. TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 Departmental Report Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On January 25, 1999, the Community Services Department released a Request for Qualifications for architectural design services for the expansion of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. The proposed expansion will include kitchen upgrades and a 2,500 to 3,000 square foot enlargement of the building to include additional space for meetings and classes. At the March meeting, the Community Services Commission appointed a Commissioner to work with staff on the design for the expansion for this facility. The first design committee meeting will be held in July of 1999. The Margarita Sidewalk Project is currently under construction. E.A. Mendoza is the contractor. The improvements will include the installation of concrete curb and gutter, landscaping, irrigation and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. Additionally, an ADA access ramp from Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfields, and slope landscaping are included as part of the project. The project should be completed by June 1999. The City of Temecula Community Services Department brought forward to the TCSD Board of Directors a Joint Use Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the Temecula Valley High School Tennis Courts. The agreement was approved by the Board of Education on August 18, 1998. The agreement provides for the lighting and maintenance of eight tennis courts at Temecula Valley High School, by the City of Temecula, in exchange for the use of the tennis courts in the City's overall parks and recreation program. Construction should begin in mid June 1999 and completed by the end of August 1999. R:~7.,IGLiltG~G)EFrRFI~9906 .do~ 3ee~ 16, 1999 The City Council awarded a construction contract to Terra Cal Construction for the Phase II improvements to the Temecula Duck Pond. This project is nearing the end of construction. The park has been hydro-seeded. Staff anticipates the project will be in the 90-day maintenance period by the end of June and the park should be dedicated in September of 1999. Improvements include stabilization of the pond edge, walkways, landscape, irrigation, bandstand, restroom, parking facilities, and road improvements to Ynez Road. The Summer/Fall issue of the City of Temecula's Guide to Leisure Activities brochure has been mailed to Temecula residents. This issue of the recreation brochure will offer many new and exciting classes and programs including the Summer Aquatics program, the Star Spangled 4m of July parade and fireworks show, and the Santa's Electric Light Parade. The City's annual Summer Swim Lesson program is currently underway. Swim lessons will be offered throughout the summer at both the Temecula Community Recreation Center and the Temecula Elementary School Pool. All levels of swim instruction are offered. Staff is gearing up for the Temecula Community Services Department's annual Summer Day Camp program which begins this week. This year's program will accommodate up to 75 children, ranging in age from 6 to 12 years of age. Held at the Community Recreation Center, the program provides arts, crafts, games, swimming and excursions to all participants in the program. This is a very successful program, and all sessions are full each summer. Due to the Temecula Valley Unified School District going back to a traditional schedule, with all students out of school during the summer months, the City's Summer Day Camp program is sold out. The maintenance division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings or facilities. The maintenance division is currently overseeing the 90 maintenance period of the Temecula Duck Pond. The City had hoped that the State Legislature would support a $1 billion bond to build libraries throughout California. At this point, it is not certain whether or not his bond will move forward. In the meantime, staff is pursuing other sources including Riverside County, the State Senate, and Federal sources through Senator Barbara Boxer. In addition to City staff pursuing funding, the County Librarian is also looking for funding for the Temecula Library project, as the Temecula Library is the highest circulating library in the Riverside County Library System and is the County's number one library to be constructed once funding is identified. R:~.~[GLERO~g~I)EPTRP~9906.do~ /mr 16, 1999 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 8, 1999 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:39 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberrs, Stone, and Lindemans. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None. Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1999; 1.2 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1999. 2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months ended March 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 1999. MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING 3 Disposition and Development A.qreement with Dual Development RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a City Council resolution entitled: Minutes.rda\060899 1 3.2 RESOLUTION NO. 99-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., DATED AS OF JUNE 8, 1999, FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1-1988 Adopt a Redevelopment Agency resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., DATED AS OF JUNE 8, 1999, FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1-1988 3.3 Authorize the expenditure of up to $2,500 for closing costs. 3.4 Authorize a reimbursement of $10, 179 for improvements costs. Agency Member Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this itme. Housing Redevelopment Manager Meyer presented the staff report (as per agenda material). Mayor Ford opended the public hearing; there being no public input, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Councilman/Chairman Lindemans moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman/Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem/Agency Member Stone who abstained. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT As per a recent quarterly sales tax report, Executive Director Nelson noted that although in light of the streetscape project in Old Town, sales tax revenues for Old Town were up 10.8% for the third and fourth quarters in 1998 in comparison to 1997. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. Minutes.rda\060899 2 ADJOURNMENT At 7:45 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 22, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel F. Lindemans, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] Minutes,rda\060899 3 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Agency Directors Shawn D. Nelson, Acting Executive Director June 22, 1999 Review and Approval of the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget Genie Roberts, Director of Finance/~ Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director7~/ OF THE RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DISCUSSION: The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) consists of three funds, the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and the Debt Service Fund. REVENUES Overall operating revenues of the RDA are anticipated to decrease in FY 1999-00 by approximately $179, 100 from the current year. A slight increase of $107,400 (2%) in property tax increment revenue is projected. A $163,000 decrease in investment interest is anticipated, due to the continued expenditure of RDA reserves and tax allocation bond proceeds on capital improvement projects. An $86,900 decrease in rental income is anticipated, due to the sale of the Jefferson Avenue ("Reeves") and Sixth Street ("Temecula Shuttle") properties. EXPENDITURES Significant items in the proposed RDA budget are as follows: Low/Moderate Income Housing · A net decrease of $226,750 in operating expenditures is reflected, due to reductions proposed for consulting services, the employee relocation program, and the first time homebuyer program. RedeveloDment · A net increase in operating expenditures of $96,854 is proposed. · Decreases are reflected in consulting services and Old Town plan implementation. · $25,000 is included to develop a promotional model of Old Town. · $206,000 is proposed for Old Town development incentives. Debt Service · An increase in interest costs is reflected, due to the recognition of $158,020 in interest on the deferred passthrough to Riverside County (this amount will be added to the outstanding deferral amount). FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed RDA operating budget reflects a spending plan that is balanced within projected revenues (other than those items specifically identified to be funded from existing reserves, such as the facade improvement program and Old Town development incentives). Attachments: Resolution No. RDA 99- Proposed FY 1999-00 Operating Budget 2 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISFIING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY 1999-00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the FY 1999-00 RDA operating budget is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of finds shah be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the Executive Director. C. The Agency Members must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The Agency Members must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level indicated in the final budget. The Executive Director may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Agency Member action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Executive Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Agency Member action, except that the Executive Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Agency Members in amounts up to project contingency established by the Agency Members. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Agency books at June 30, 1999 are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 1999-00. Section 4. The Agency Secretary shah certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula this 22'~ day of June, 1999. Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Agency Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22~d day of June, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Agency Secretary/City Clerk PROPOSED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FY 1999-00 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY City of Temecula REVENUE8 BY FUND - REDEFELOPMENT AGENCY Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY 1997-98 Estimated FY 1998-99 Projected FY 1999-00 Low/Moderate Income Set Aside $ 1,575,790 $ Rodevelopment* 738,934 Debt Service 6.360.602 Total- $ 8,675.326 $ 1,579,372 623,800 5,859,588 8.062,760 *Does not include operating transfers frown Debt Service Fund. 1,336,100 331,000 5,483,200 7,150,300 1,269,000 113,100 5,778,570 7, 160,670 $9,000.000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000.000 $4,000.000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 FOUR YEAR COMPAKISON S8,675,326 I JS8,062,760 I I Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY 1997-98 m ~. ~:':..!i .::"::i:,-::!;:~':' I I I Estimated FY 1998-99 Projected FY 1999-00 I Low/Mod Set Aside [] Redevelopment m Debt Service City of Tenwcula EXPENDITURE ..~UJlJ!ARY BY CATEGORY- REDEI/ELOP,~!ENr AGENCY FUNDS Operation~ Fund Penonnei & Maintenance Low/Moderate Income Set Aside $ 202,150 $ 643,840 Rodevelopment 84,430 935,150 $ I)~bt Service 5, 1 ! 1,820 Total $ 286,580 $ 6.690,810 $ Capital Outlay Ol~mtin~ Tram fen $ $ 1,105,400 $ 1,105,400 $ Total 845,990 1,019,580 6,217,220 8,082.790 City of Temecula CHAN(;E,.V IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 Revenues Odlef Sources: Operating Transfers In Long-term D~bt Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) (I) Ot~er Uses: Operating Transfers Out (2) Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) Ex3~enditures and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999 (3) Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 Special Revenue Fund General Gas Low/~loderale Fund Ta; Housing $ 25,640,700 $ 881,100 $ 1,269,000 881,100 Redevelopment Atent7 Redevelop. $ 113,100 $ 1,105,400 26,521,800 881,100 1,269,000 1,218,500 (24,776,410) (845,990) (1,019,580) (95/,000) (881,1oo) DeM Service 4,8O6,OOO 972,57O 5,77&570 (5,111,820) (1,105,400) 787,390 423,010 198,920 (438,650) 12.178.609 ! 76.990 551,764 1,887,570 12,965,999 600,000 750,684 1,448,920 150,000 216500 98,484 285,900 60o,000 Designations: Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 7.432,923 Continuing Appropriation 144,444 Debt Service Reserves: Encumbrances 300,000 Land Held for Resale 530,401 Long-term Receivables 3,013,892 Debt Service Unreserved Fund BalanceEquity, June 30. 2000 $. 1.544.339 $ $ $ (I) Excludes amounts budgeted for capital outlay through the capital improvement program. (2) General Fund Operating Tray. slots Out includes a $725,000 transfer to the Cit3~s capital Projects Fund. The Capital Projects Fund is presented in ~c separate capital improvement program budget documcnL (3) Redevelopmerit Agency fund balances at July I, 1999 do not include mounts committed to the City's capital improvement pingrant 1,448,920 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HOUSING/ REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER John Meyer I HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT Temecula O.N.E. First Time Homebuyer Residential Improvement Programs Land Acquisition Affordable Housing Project Development Capital Projects Old Town Specific Plan Implementation Old Town Advisory Committee Community Liaison 4 City of Temecula DEPARTAIENT SUlllJ!ARY- REDEVELOP~!ENT AGENCY Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside Funding Source: Tax Increment Expenditure Summary Actual FY 1996-97 Personnel $ 65,777 Operations and Maintenance 309, 157 Capital Outlay Total $ 374,934 Actual FY 1997-98 209,872 361,816 14,979 $ 586,667 Budgeted FY 1998-99 $ 187,270 885,470 ,072,740 Proposed FY 19994}0 202, 150 643,840 . 845,990 Redevelonment Funding Source: Tax Increment Actual Expenditure Summary FY 1996-97 Personnel $ 136,249 Operations and Maintenance 1,136,389 Capital Outlay Total $ 1,272,638 Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 219,967 $ 90,480 661,349 829,246 7,780 3,000 889,096 $ 922,726 $ 84~30 935,150 $ 1,019,580 Debt Sen'ice -Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Funding Source: Actual Actual Budgeted FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 5,237,153 Toml $ 5,237,153 5,120,426 $ 4,899270 5,120,426 $ 4,899,270 Tax Increment Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 5,111,820 $ 5,111,820 *Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund. Personnel Allocation Authorized 1998-99 Changes Proposed 1999-00 LOW/MOD HOUSING Housing/Redevelopment Manager Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Sub-Total 0.75 0.75 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 CIP/REDEVELOPMENT Housing/Redevelopment Manager Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary. Sub-Total Redevelopment Agency Total 0.25 0.25 0.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.50 City of Temecula DEPARTZ/1F3~ S~RY- REDEVF~OPA~ENT AGENCY Program: Housing MISSION: The Housing Program is responsible for developing, rehabilitafin~ and preserving affordable housing oppommifies. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Funded 20 first time homebuyen Funded 36 resideafial improve!lleots, consisting of painting, roofing and fencing OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOX~E FAMILIES AND TO EXPAND THEIR AVAH~ABILITY. Ensm-e complinnce with State Redevelopmerit Law. Monitor existing affordable housing covenants. Administer the First Time Homebuyer and Employee Relccation Programs. Administer the Residential Improvement Program. Acquire land and develop projects to support new affordable housing opportunities. Encourage private invcstment in the expansion of affordable housing. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of affordable housing units provided Number of affordable housing units rehabffitated Number of First Time Homebuyers assisted Number of Employee Relocation Homebuyers assisted PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997198 FY 1998/99 ' FY 1999100 7 150 76 78 30 20 36 175 20 18 20 15 0 0 0 6 7 City of Temec~la DEPAR~t,I~,~ S~Y - REDEVELOPA,FENT ,~ GENCT' Program: Redevelopmerit MISSION: The Redevelopment Program is responsible for encoura~ng private investment, ! removing blight, and promoting economic revit~liT~lion in the redevelopment project area. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed constnmtion of the Old Town Streetsrape Improvement Project GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: IMPLEMENT THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. Work with Old Town merchants, property owners, civic groups and the development community to: make private and public improvements in Old Town, develop projects that will revitalize Old Town economy, and assist in the private rehabilitatkm of buildings in Old Town. Promote and encourage participation in the Facade Improvement Program. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of F ag;ade Improvement projects completed Number of historical slructures assisted Number of redevelopment projects negotiated and completed PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FIt 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999100 6 3 6 8 6 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 City of Temecula D~P,4RTZ~iV'F S~Y- R~DEr/ELOPA4~IV~ ,4 GF_~rCY Program: Debt Service MISSION: The Debt Service Program is the oper~ng budget for the Redcvelopment Agency. Items budgeted include debt service princi~ and interest, property tax ~ministrativc fees, and passthrough agreements. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · All debt service and related costs for the 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds were made in a timely manner ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT FINANCE DIRECTO(~ ~ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.~___ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDAREPORT Executive DirectorlRedevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager~j~ June 22, 1999 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of June 22, 1999 for the Redevelopment Department. HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Program Funding in the amount of $400,000 is available for FY 98-99. 16 Loans have been closed for $336,760 with 2 loans pending. Residential Improvement Proc~rams For FY 98/99, 37 projects have been completed and 15 are in process. The program budget is $200,000 and $141,649.64 has been funded. The majodty of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement. Affordable Rental Housina Projects Agency staff has the responsibility for monitoring all projects obtaining Agency assistance to rehabilitate existing affordable rental housing as well as new construction. After completion, annual reporting is required to ensure all tenants continue to meet income criteria outlined in the Project Regulatory Agreement and that all rents charged are within established affordable limits. Review of a 30-unit project, Rancho Creek Apartments, has been completed and the project is in compliance with affordability covenants. R:\SYERSK\MONTHLLY\REPORT.JUNE.doc Mission Village Redevelopment Projects Rehabilitation of 38 distressed affordable housing units is underway, and construction of 38 new units has begun. All units will be occupied by very low and low-income families. Staff is currently reviewing compliance of the Mission Village project. Pujol Acguisitions for Affordable Housing Staff has initiated negotiations with six properly owners in the Pujol area to purchase their property for the future development of affordable housing. Two owners have accepted offers at the appraised value, and two others have returned counter-offers. Temecula Villas Due to the expiration of the property owner's contract with HUD to subsidize rants, staff has assisted 19 households with relocation issues. In addition, we are working with the owner to retain affordable housing units in the future. OLD TOWN Old Town Streetscape Improvement Projects The Streetscape improvement project is complete. The sound system is operational and the gateway arches and flagpoles have been installed. The Gateway plaques have been ordered and are scheduled to arrive in a few weeks. Facade Improvement/Non-Conforming Sign Program The following facade improvement/sign projects are completed: · Express Bodicare (new business on Front Street) - New signs only · Musicians Workshop (Mercedes) - New handicap parking and restroom facilities, new front windows and front entry door The following facade improvements are underway: · Second Street Automotive (Second and Mercedes) - Complete Facade Renovation Rancon Building (Front Street) - Repaint Trim · Kreigers General Store (Mercedes) - New exterior facade and handicap restroom facilities · U.S. Land (Front Street) - Exterior Paint R:\syersk\monthly\report. May 2 Swing Inn (Front Street) Extedor Paint · Main Street Salon - Signs R :\syersk~monthly\report. May 3 ITEM 20 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager June 22, 1999 Modification of the Parking Standards for pad of the Old Town Specific Plan (Planning Application No. PA99-0160) RECOMMENDATION: Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160. BACKGROUND: The Old Town Specific Plan was initially approved in 1994. One of the components of the Specific Plan was the provision of additional parking in the core area of Old Town. This item has been under active discussion since 1997. In 1998, the City Council appointed councilmembers Lindemans and Ford to a subcommittee to review possible parking options in Old Town and make a recommendation on how to address this issue. The subcommittee members met on March 2, 1999 to review the situation and discuss the vadous options. As a result of their meeting, the subcommittee suggested that the City eliminate the parking standard for all uses in the core of Old Town Temecula and that the City should provide the necessary parking in several public lots spread throughout Old Town. The subcommittee's recommendation has resulted in the current proposal to eliminate the off-street parking requirement in the Tourist Retail Core and the Community Commercial/Tourist Support Districts. These two areas represent the heart of Old Town Temecula. The current parking standards (from the Development Code) would continue to apply to the remaining eight districts of the Specific Plan. R:~staffrpt\l 60pa99 CC.doc 1 At the May 19, 1999 Planning Commission, this request was considered by the Commission and they unanimously recommended that the Council adopt this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. In their action, the Commission also suggested that in the future, there would most likely be a need to provide additional handicapped parking throughout Old Town and to consider possible loading restrictions. In addition, as Old Town gets closer to build-out conditions, there may be a need for a plan to ensure that adequate public parking and restroom facilities are available when they are needed. A copy of the Commission Resolution is included with this Staff Report in Attachment No. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This plan amendment is a minor modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained in the previously adopted specific (community) plan. The amendment will not change any of the potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, this action is exempt from environmental review according to the provisions of 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15061 (b)(3) states that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is consistent with the adopted City General Plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term goals and objectives contained in the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed amendment will further the redevelopment and revitalization of the Old Town area. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be a future fiscal impact on the City and/or Redevelopment Agency as needed public parking is constructed with public funds. The magnitude of this impact cannot be determined at this time. ATTACHMENT: Ordinance - Page PC Resolution - Page Old Town Specific Plan Land Use Map - Page R:~staffrpt\160pa99 CC.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PROPOSED ORDINANCE R :~staffrpt\160pa99 CC .doc 3 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. follows: Section III. F. 2. of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to read as "2. Parking The parking requirements for the Specific Plan shall be the same as those delineated in Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code, as amended, except that no on-site parking is required for uses within the Toudst Retail Core (TRC) and Community Commerdal/Tourist Support (CCTS) Planning Areas." Section 2. following findings: Findin.cls. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. Section 3. Environmental Determination. This plan amendment represents a minor modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained in the previously adopted specific plan. The amendment will not change any of the potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, this action is exempt from environmental review according to the provisions of 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. R:%staffrpt\160pa99 CC.doc 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22"~ day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22"d day of June, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R :~staffrpt\160pa99 CC .doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION R:%staffrpt\l 60pa99 CC.doc 6 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160) WHEREAS, a Subcommittee of the City Council has suggested that the parking standards in the Old Town area be amended to further encourage the revitalization of this historic area; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0160 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0160 on May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0160; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findin.as. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0160, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term goals and objectives contained in the Old Town Specific Plan. 2. The proposed amendment will further the redevelopment and revitalization of the Old Town area. Section 3. Recommendation of Approval. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Ordinance, substantially in the form that is contained in Exhibit A, attached to this Resolution. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. This amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan represents a minor modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained in the previously adopted specific plan. The amendment will not change any of the potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, this action is exempt from environmental review according to the provisions of 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. R:Lstaffrpt~160pa99 CC.doc 7 Section 5. Additional Comments. The Planning Commission also wishes to share the following thoughts about Old Town with the City Council. A. That there may be a need for either on-street handicapped parking or handicapped parking that is dispersed throughout the core area. B. That there may a need in the future for the City to adopt loading and delivery restrictions in the Old Town area, especially along Front Street. C. As we get closer to build-out conditions, there may be a need for an overall public parking and restroom plan in the core area to ensure that adequate public parking is available when Old Town becomes economically successful. This could also include a method for the City to track the amount of on- and off-street parking throughout this area. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19a' day of May, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R :~staffrpt\160pa99 CC .doc 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP R:~staffrpt\l 60pa99 CC.doc 9 III ' in / / /~ / / ITEM 21 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT C ATT~)RPNPERYOV~.,)~ ) ITY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Howard R. Windsor, Fire Marshal/Battalion Chief June 22, 1999 An Urgency Ordinance Amending the California Fire Code. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council I Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment. 2. Approve a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled: URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. p:\forms~city clerk forms~staff report - shell 1 Conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 99- entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the most current edition of the California Fire Code is one of the most important public health, safety and welfare issues that will be presented to you for your consideration and adoption. The fire codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of California are reviewed, amended and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a three (3) year code adoption cycle. Upon the adoption and publication of the State Codes, each local jurisdiction has a period of 180 days to further modify these Codes with more stringent local amendments based upon local geographical, topographical and or climatic conditions. The ordinance before you tonight is being presented as an urgency ordinance. The state mandated adoption date is July 1, 1999. Therefore, due to the length of time involved with staff's extensive study of the new code editions, and to enable staff to adopt the California Fire Code with local amendments before this date, the urgency action is necessary. The ordinance before you tonight proposes very few local amendments. Many of the provisions in this ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the current Municipal Code. Staff is proposing to modify the code provisions that are mostly administrative in nature and are substantiated on the requirements of fire apparatus for turning radius, weight and operational considerations. Provisions that dictate the requirement of fire extinguishing systems based on building construction type, size of the building, and required fire flow currently exist and will be carried forward, These provisions are consistent with regulations as currently required by Riverside County Fire Department. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: p:~forms~city clerk forms~staff report - shell 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. WHEREAS, certain building standards and other related uniform cedes are adopted by the State of California in the California Building Standards Code which becomes applicable in the City unless amended by the City pursuant to Health and Safety Cede Section 17958; and, WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 provides for the City Council to make reasonably necessary changes or modifications based on certain local conditions before adopting the most current edition of the model codes; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Chief of the City of Temecula has determined and recommended that the modifications to the California Fire Code CCR, Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition are reasonably required to be adopted by the City of Temecula; and, WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires the City Council to make express findings of the necessity for modifications to the building standards in the most current editions of the model codes as adopted by the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby expressly finds that the amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Fire Code, CCR Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition, contained in Ordinance No. 99- regarding identification of fire protection equipment and premises (Subsections C and D of Sections 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire apparatus access roads (Subsections E, F, G, H, I, J and K of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire protection systems and equipment (Subsections L, M, N, O, P, and Q of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire-extinguishing systems (Subsection R, S and T of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire alarms (Subsection U of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire-flow requirements (Subsection W of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code) and fire hydrant locations (Subsection X of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code) are reasonably necessary due to consideration of specific local climatic, geological or topographical conditions as follows: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot, dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These winds constitute a contributing factor which causes small fires originating in high density development presently being constructed in the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula which spread quickly and create the need for an increased level of fire protection. This added protection, including, but not limited to on-site protection, will supplement normal Fire Department response available in new development, and provide immediate fire protection for life and safety of multiple- occupancy occupants during fire occurrence. Topographical Conditions: Traffic and circulation congested in urban areas often place Fire Department response time to emergencies at risk. This condition makes the need for enhanced on-site protection for property occupants necessary. Geological Conditions: The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of the degree of the City 's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake, emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds that the administrative amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Fire Code, CCR Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition, contained in Ordinance No. 99-__ regarding definitions (Subsections A and B of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code) and cost recovery (Subsection V of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), are reasonably necessary to allow for the application of the Fire Code by procedures suited to the size and nature of the City's staff and administrative agencies by means suited to the City's experience with local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions and to provide sufficient staff support for the time-consuming inspections and analysis required by the City's fire and geological hazards. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22rid day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22rid day of June, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16 of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I CODES ADOPTED 15.16.010. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the Califomia Fire Code, 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), is adopted by reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, including: A, California Fire Code (CFC) Volume 1, CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition with appendices I-A, I-C, II-A, II-B, II-E, II-F, II-G, II-I, II-J, III-A, III- B, IV-B and V-A. Uniform Fire Code Standards Volume 2, 1997 edition as amended by the California Fire Code (CFC), CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition. ARTICLE II AMENDMENTS 15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Corporate counsel shall mean the City Attomey of the City of Temecula. B, Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Municipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shah be known as Ords\95-15 i the City of Temecula a municipality. Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an approved manner to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots). See also Section 1001.7. Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Premises Identification Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches in size. E, Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows: Dimensions Orals\95-15 2 Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches. EXCEPTION: 1. Vertical clearances may be reduced, provided such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance when approved. 2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have and an unobstructed width of not less than twenty (20) feet. Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. F. Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as follows: Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 8704, prior to building construction all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. When temporary fire apparatus access roads are provided for use until permanent fire access roads are installed; the fire apparatus roads shall be an all weather surface for an 80,000 lbs GVW. G. Section 902.2.2.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Turning Radius Fire apparatus access roads for commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shah have a tuming radius of a minimum forty-five (45) feet-outside radius. EXCEPTION: For single family residential, fire apparatus access Orals\95-15 3 roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38) feet outside radius. Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the mining around of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end road or cul-de-sac shall not exceed 1320 feet. Section 902.2.2.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Bridges When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access road, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized standards. See Article 90, Standard a. 1.1 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Bridges shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 lbs. GVW. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the chief. Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows: Grade The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum Onls\95-15 4 required widths and clearances established under Section 902.2.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. Entrances to roads, trails or other accessways which have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with Section 902.2.4.2 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited, as an infraction, or removed at the owners' expense, forthwith, by any public agency. L, Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows: Plans Complete plans and specifications for fire alarm systems; fire-extinguishing systems, including automatic sprinklers and wet or dry standpipes; halon systems and other special types of fire-extinguishing systems; basement pipe inlets; and other fire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall include, but not limited to, a floor plan; location of all alarm-initiating and alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipment; annunciation; power connection; battery calculations; conductor type and sizes; voltage drop calculations; and manufacturers, model numbers and listing information for all equipment, devices and materials, [for SFM] and state fire marshal listing number of all equipment, devices and materials requiring listing. Hans and specifications for automatic fire sprinklers or suppression systems in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not limited to: a site plan; a building floor plan; piping plan (on a separate sheet); reflective ceiling plan (on a separate sheet); building cross sections; calculations; hanger details; earthquake sway brace details and calculations; manufacturer specifications, model numbers and listing information for all equipment, devices and materials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided for each system riser serving a building and for each floor when system risers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan. Ords\95-15 5 System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply in calculated systems. Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing. Section 1001.5.4 is amended to read as follows: Systems in high-rise buildings. The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section 403.) Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows: Smoke-control systems. Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke- removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies, shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. Section 1001.7.1 is amended to read as follows: General Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and other materials or things shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that Orals\95-15 6 would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hydrant and shall comply with Section 1001.7.2. Automatic fire sprinkler system risers shall not be obstructed in any manner, if a system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall, soffit, column, or other building construction, it shall be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser, access shall be provided by means of a door with the minimum dimensions two (2) feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall. P. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows: Clear space around hydrants. A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections, post indicator valves, OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances. Q. section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows: Special Hazards. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus, or emergency operations is unduly difficult, the chief is authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm systems, approved fire department communication systems, automatic sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose, fixed or portable fire extinguishers, suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus, manual or automatic covers, carbon dioxide, foam, halogenated or dry chemical or other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided, they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform Fire Code Standards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90 and Section 101.3. Ords\95-15 7 Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the Building Code and Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with Article 81. S, Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows: General An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see Section 1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Ords\95-15 8 Unless State Code or Statutes, Califomia Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shah have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shah install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 2 or the Califomia Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9. Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by UFC. Standard 10-2 or, when approved by the chief, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. Ords\95-15 9 Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows: Connections to other systems. A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having jurisdiction. Burgarly, security systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted to be a part of, or be connected to fire alarm systems. All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system. Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Cost Recovery Section 24.1. Any person who negligenfiy, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or attended by him to escape his control or bum any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of mitigating and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be Ords\95-15 10 collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public or private agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2. The expense of securing any emergency, which is a result of a violation of this ordinance, is a charge against the person whose violation of this ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses incurred by the Fire Department for securing such emergency shall constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2.1. The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectAble by the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case of an obligation arising under contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.3. Structure, improvement shall mean, for the purposes of this Section only, any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire. Section 24.4 Requests for copies of public and legal documents, photographs, etc., relating to department activities is available as authorized by law through the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All document requests shall Orda\95-15 11 be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside County Fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Riverside County Ordinance 671. Appendix Chapter III-A, Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Fire-flow requirements for residential tracts. commercial, retail, industrial. heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments. 5.3 One and Two family residential tracts with structures less than 3,600 square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.4 Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.5 Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. Appendix Chapter III-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows: LOCATION Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets. Fire hydrants used or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by Table A III-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads and adjacent public streets. EXCEPTION: When required hydrants utilized or is installed to the frontage requirements which serves single family dwellings on Ords~95-15 12 residential streets, such fire hydrant may be on either side of the street. SECTION 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. State law requires that localities adopt the California Building Standards Code and modifications thereto, by July 1, 1999. It is essential that the City have in effect on the date codes that comport with state law and contain those modifications necessitated by unique topographic, geologic and climatic conditions. In the absence of immediate effectiveness, the provisions of the Fire Code unique to the City's special circumstances will not be in place and this will have a detrimental effect on the public, health safety and welfare. The modifications to the Codes contain vital provisions regarding administrative procedures, fire-extinguishing systems, and other similar matters necessitated by the City's proximity to active earthquake fault zones, the City's exposure to Santa Ana winds, and the City's limited rainfall in the summer and fall months. For these reasons, the public health, safety and welfare require that this ordinance take effect on July 1, 1999 as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code Sections 36934 and 36937. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become operative on July 1, 1999. Orals\95-15 13 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Ords\95-15 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-__was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 6th day of July, 1999, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk O ras\95 - 15 15 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAFFER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16 of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I CODES ADOPTED 15.16.010. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the California Fire Code, 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), is adopted by reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, including: A, California Fire Code (CFC) Volume 1, CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition with appendices I-A, I-C, II-A, H-B, II-E, II-F, II-G, II-I, II-J, III-A, III- B, IV-B and V-A. Uniform Fire Code Standards Volume 2, 1997 edition as amended by the California Fire Code (CFC), CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition. ARTICLE II AMENDMENTS 15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Corporate counsel shall mean the City Attomey of the City of Temecula. Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Municipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shall be known as Ords\95-15 I the City of Temecula a municipality. C. Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an approved manner to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots). See also Section 1001.7. D. Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Premises Identification Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches in size. E. Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows: Dimensions 0rd8\95-15 2 Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches. EXCEPTION: 1. Vertical clearances may be reduced, provided such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance when approved. 2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have and an unobstructed width of not less than twenty (20) feet. Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as follows: Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 8704, prior to building construction all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. When temporary fire apparatus access roads are provided for use until permanent fire access roads are installed; the fire apparatus roads shall be an all weather surface for an 80,000 lbs GVW. Section 902.2.2.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Turning Radius Fire apparatus access roads for commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a turning radius of a minimum forty-five (45) feet-outside radius. EXCEPTION: For single family residential, fire apparatus access Ords\95-15 3 roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38) feet outside radius. Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end road or eul-de-sac shall not exceed 1320 feet. Section 902.2.2.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Bridges When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access road, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized standards. See Article 90, Standard a. 1.1 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Bridges shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 lbs. GVW. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the chief. Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows: Grade The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum O~s\95-15 4 required widths and clearances established under Section 902.2.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. Entrances to roads, trails or other accessways which have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with Section 902.2.4.2 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited, as an infraction, or removed at the owners' expense, forthwith, by any public agency. L. Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows: Plans Complete plans and specifications for fire alarm systems; fire-extinguishing systems, including automatic sprinklers and wet or dry standpipes; halon systems and other special types of fire-extinguishing systems; basement pipe inlets; and other fire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall include, but not limited to, a floor plan; location of all alarm-initiating and alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipment; annunciation; power connection; battery calculations; conductor type and sizes; voltage drop calculations; and manufacturers, model numbers and listing information for all equipment, devices and materials, [for SFM] and state fire marshal listing number of all equipment, devices and materials requiring listing. Plans and specifications for automatic fire sprinklers or suppression systems in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not limited to: a site plan; a building floor plan; piping plan (on a separate sheet); reflective ceiling plan (on a separate sheet); building cross sections; calculations; hanger details; earthquake sway brace details and calculations; manufacturer specifications, model numbers and listing information for all equipment, devices and materials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided for each system riser serving a building and for each floor when system risers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan. Ords\95-15 5 System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply in calculated systems. Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing. Section 1001.5.4 is amended to read as follows: Systems in high-rise buildings. The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section 403 .) Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows: Smoke-control systems. Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke- removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies, shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. Section 1001.7.1 is amended to read as follows: General Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and other materials or things shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that Ords\95-15 6 would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hydrant and shall comply with Section 1001.7.2. Automatic fire sprinkler system risers shall not be obstructed in any manner, if a system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall, soffit, column, or other building construction, it shall be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser, access shall be provided by means of a door with the minimum dimensions two (2) feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall. P. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows: Clear space around hydrants. A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections, post indicator valves, OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances. Q. Section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows: Special Hazards. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus, or emergency operations is unduly difficult, the chief is authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm systems, approved fire department communication systems, automatic sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose, fixed or portable fire extinguishers, suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus, manual or automatic covers, carbon dioxide, foam, halogenated or dry chemical or other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided, they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform Fire Code Standards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90 and Section 101.3. Ord8\95-15 7 R. Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the Building Code and Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with Article 81. S. Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows: General An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see Section 1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Orda\95-15 8 Unless State Code or Statutes, Califomia Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9. Te Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows: WhereRequired All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by UFC. Standard 10-2 or, when approved by the chief, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. Ord8\95-15 9 Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows: Connections to other systems. A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having jurisdiction. Burgarly, security systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted to be a part of, or be connected to fire alarm systems. All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system. Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Cost Recovery Section 24.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or artended by him to escape his control or bum any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of mitigating and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be Orals\95-15 l 0 collecfible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public or private agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2. The expense of securing any emergency, which is a result of a violation of this ordinance, is a charge against the person whose violation of this ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses incurred by the Fire Department for securing such emergency shall constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2.1. The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectible by the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case of an obligation arising under contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.3. Structure, improvement shall mean, for the purposes of this Section only, any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire. Section 24.4 Requests for copies of public and legal documents, photographs, etc., relating to department activities is available as authorized by law through the Fire Department' s Custodian of Records. All document requests shall Ords\95-15 11 be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside County Fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Riverside County Ordinance 671. W. Appendix Chapter III-A, Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Fire-flow requirements for residential tracts, commercial, retail, industrial. heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments. 5.3 One and Two family residential tracts with structures less than 3,600 square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.4 Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.5 Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. X. Appendix Chapter III-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows: LOCATION Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets. Fire hydrants used or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by Table A III-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads and adjacent public streets. EXCEPTION: When required hydrants utilized or is installed to the frontage requirements which serves single family dwellings on Orals\95-15 12 residential streets, such fire hydrant may be on either side of the street. SECTION 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 22nd day of June 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Orcts\95-15 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Ords\95-15 14 ITEM 22 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~E~ C ATTORNEY ~ f ITY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CITY MANAGER . CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official June 22, 1999 An Urgency Ordinance Amending the Uniform Building Codes RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment. Approve a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODES, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled: 6/16/99 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99--- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: 1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. 4. Conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 99-__ entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99-- AN ORDINANCE OF THE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIAVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the most current editions of the model building codes is one of the most important building safety issues that will be presented to you for your consideration and adoption. The building codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of California are reviewed, amended and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a three (3) year code adoption cycle. Upon adoption and publication of these codes, each local jurisdiction has a period of 180 days to further modify these codes with more stringent local amendments based upon specific local geological, topographical and or climatic conditions. The ordinance before you tonight is being presented as an urgency ordinance. The state mandated adoption date is July 1, 1999. Therefore, due to the time involved with staffs' extensive study of the new code editions and to enable staff to adopt the state building cedes with local amendments before this date, the urgency action is necessary. The ordinance proposes very few local amendments. Staff has been involved in a statewide effort to obtain uniformity among regional or county jurisdictions in the code provisions they enforce. Specifically, staff is proposing to modify the code provisions affecting the required plumbing fixture counts in the Old Town Specific Plan area. Due to the fact that space is of a premium in this area, past history has shown that a majority of buildings in the Old Town Specific Plan area are not capable of complying with current code provisions without entering into costly additions to buildings. Unlike other areas of the city, public restroom facilities have been provided at 2 6/17/99 various locations throughout Old Town with others planned, The code amendment proposed will raise the occupant loading before additional restrooms and fixtures are required. Other amendments in this legislation are mostly administrative in nature. Regulations that dictate the minimum fire resistance of roofing material used in the city and the requirement for licensed contractors to perform certain work in commercial buildings currently exist and will be carried forward. FISCAL IMPACT: None 6/~7/99 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAFFER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 1998 EDITION, THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION, THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 1998 EDITION, AND THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION, ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. WHEREAS, certain building standards and other related uniform codes are adopted by the State of Califomia in the California Building Standards Code which becomes applicable in the City unless mended by the City pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958; and, WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 provides for the City Council to make reasonably necessary changes or modifications based on certain local conditions before adopting the most current edition of the model codes; and, WHEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Temecula has determined and recommended that the modifications to the California Building Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, and the California Electrical Code are reasonably required to be adopted by the City of Temecula; and, WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires the City Council to make express findings of the necessity for modifications to the building standards in the most current editions of the model codes as adopted by the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds that the following amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Building Code, 1998 edition, the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, and the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, contained in Ordinance 99-__ are reasonably necessary due to consideration of specific local climatic, geological or topographical conditions as follows: Resos\95-112 1 SECTION 15.04.020 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 1998 EDITION. A. Section 106.2 Work Exempt from Permits. 5. Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over 4" measured from the top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding ~ammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local This conditions: Geological Conditions: The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of the degree of the City 's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake, emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow. B. Section 304.1 This amendment is administrative in nature necessitated by the space restrictions in Old Town to accommodate modifications of accessible restroom fixtures. This amendment is in line with the B occupancy criteria of 50 or less occupants as provided in the California Building Code. C. Section 502 This amendment is administrative in nature in that it further defines the address height criteria for residential, and individual commercial suistes. D. Section 904 Fire-Extinguishing Systems. These amendments are reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot, dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These winds constitute a contributing factor which causes small fires originating in high density development presently being constructed in the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula which spread quickly and create the need for an increased level of fire protection. This added Resos\95-112 2 protection, including, but not limited to on-site protection, will supplement normal Fire Department response available in new development, and provide immediate fire protection for life and safety of multiple-occupancy occupants during fire occurrence. Topographical Conditions: Traffic and circulation congested in urban areas often place Fire Department response time to emergencies at risk. This condition makes the need for enhanced on-site protection for property occupants necessary. Geological Conditions: The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of the degree of the City' s urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake, emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow. C. Section 1503 Roof-Covering Requirements... This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot, dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These climatic conditions cause extreme drying of vegetation and common building materials and predispose the area to large destructive fires. Higher building standards are necessary to protect against the increased risk of fire. D. Section 1924. Minimum Slab Thickness...; and Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels... These amendments are reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Resos\95-112 3 Topographical Conditions: The City is comprised of varying soil conditions and a fluctuating water table that is fed by artesian springs. This water table will elevate substantially following heavy rain. The addition of a moisture barrier will mitigate excess moisture absorption into concrete placed on grade. Geological Conditions: The City of Temecula is located in Seismic Zone No. 4 and contains two (2) faults running north and south within its boundaries. The addition of slab dowels as an additional means of attachment of added structures to existing is intended to help mitigate the effects of seismic activity on these connections. E. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is considered to be administrative in nature and necessary in order to allow for a 54 inch release mechanism height from grade specified. II. SECTION 15.04.030 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION. A. Section 504 Environmental Air Ducts. Section 504.1 Makeup and exhaust ducts... This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Climatic Conditions: Due to the proximity to the ocean and the influx of moist air experienced in the City, water deposited in the corrugated depressions of the aluminum flex ducting will not properly evaporate, thus creating a potential for stagnation, mildew, and possible excessive build up. III. SECTION 15.04.040 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 1998 EDITION A. Section 413 and Table 4-1 This amendment is administrative in nature. The deletion of this section is made in lieu of utilizing Chapter 29 and Appendix Chapter 29 of the California Building Code as the standard for establishing required amber of plumbing fixtures. Section 719.5 This amendment is administrative in nature intended to clarify an approved material for clean out installations. This is in answer to our history of inquiries on this subject. Resos\95-112 4 C. Section 1204.3.2 Final Piping Inspection This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the foil.wing local conditions: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Hot, dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These conditions contribute significantly to the fluctuation of air pressure in gas plumbing lines. In lines larger than two (2) inches these fluctuations are subtler because of the volume, hence detecting a small leak becomes more difficult in the code prescribed time frame of ten minutes. Do Section 1211.3 This amendment is administrative in nature intended to address the installation of propone gas underslab areas. This section does not address propane installation. IV. SECTION 15.04.050 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION. A. Article 336 Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cable. Section 336-3 Uses Permitted... This amendment is reasonably conditions: necessary because of the following local Topographical Conditions: The City is located on a north/south transportation corridor and is developing both a medical manufacturing and micro component business base. These occupancies typically contain hazardous uses of varying degree. Non-metallic sheathed cable is not prohibited from use in the city, but only in commercial and industrial type applications where the type of construction and constant tenant improvement needs cause a concern for the potential damage that may be caused to this cable' s soft insulation and protection sheathing. Resos\95-112 5 B. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds that the administrative amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Building Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, and California Electrical Code contained in Ordinance No. 99-__ regarding violations and penalties (Building Code Section 103, Mechanical Code Section 111, Plumbing Code Section 102.3.2, and Electrical Code Section 90-04), fees (Building Code Section 107 and Table l-A, Mechanical Code Section 115, and Plumbing Code Section 103.4), definitions (Plumbing Code Section 211) and other provisions (e.g., Building Code Section 106.3.1), are reasonably necessary to allow for the application of such Codes by procedures suited to the size and nature of the City's staff and administrative agencies by means suited to the City's experience with local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions and to provide sufficient staff support for the time-consuming inspections and analysis required by the City's fire and seismic hazards. C. Section 90-8. This amendment is administrative in nature intended to bring the requirement of this section in line with the provisions of the Temecula Development Code. D. Section 110-5. This amendment is administrative in nature intended to establish a minimum size for the use of aluminum conductors primarily convenience receptacle and circuit breaker installations in residential and light commercial construction. The receptacles available are not designed for regular maintenance primarily due to the areas they are typically used in. D.Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Resos\95-112 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Resos\95-112 7 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMF~NDMF~NTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILr}ING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 Er}ITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMI~NT OF DANGEROUS BUILI}INGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 Er}ITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELFCTRICAL CODE; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION I: Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is mended to read as follows: 15.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula: As California Building Code, 1998 Edition (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); B$ California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); California Plumbing Code, 1998 Edition (Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); California Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; Ord~\95-14 I Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; and A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such codes are in force. 15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read as follows: 0 Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read as follows: De All contracton and their subcontractors must have current and valid city business licenses. Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thwugh 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her.in by reference. All references in the California Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shah mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in ac~or~ce with Section 15.02.010 her.in. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety. Ords\95-14 2 F. Section 304.1 is mended by adding the following exception: Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area, for the purpose of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less. G. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core CIRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background. H. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in accordance with this Section and Fire Code Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with the Fire Code. I. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows: Where required An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. Otd,\95-14 3 [For SFM] For special provisions on hazardota chemicals and magnesiton, and calcium carbide, see the Hre Code. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see the Fire Code. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-IH-A-1 requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR Part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR Part 9. J. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Ords\95-14 4 Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically Wansmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the fire department, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An appwved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. Exception: 1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. Exception: Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504, except that no roof coveting shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly. 1. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. 2. The roof coveting of any structure located on a parcel with a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof coveting of not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approval by the Building Official. 3. The roof coveting of all re-roofing shall conform to the applicable provisions of this Section as amended herfin, except that the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the OralsLOS-14 5 remainder of the roof. K. Section 1924 is hereby mended to read as follows: Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2) inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) rail moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover. Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217. Section 1924 is hereby further mended by adding thereto a new paragraph to read as follows: Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches in length. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the barrier that faces away from the swimming pool. The following appendices are deleted in their entirety from the 1998 California Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23, 30, 33, 34. 15.04.030 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections Ord~\95-14 6 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.040 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A® Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated heroin by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 2 11 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which is direc~y connected to the drainage system. Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code Orals\95-14 7 Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code. F. Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap" or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a twenty-four (24) hour graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction. H. Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the following exceptions: Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approved by the Building Official. Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix I - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings, is hereby deleted in its etirety. 15.04.050 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 904 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following: Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted.) Where spare circuit protective devices are Ords\95-14 8 provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official. Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used. D. Section 3364 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-4Co), and shall only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade. 15.04.060 Uniform Administrative Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by Ords\95-14 9 reference. Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. 15.04.070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. 15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Counc~ in accx~rdance with Section 15.02.010 herein. SECTION H: All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION llI: To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. Ord,\95-14 10 SECTION IV: If an section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION V: State law requires that localities adopt the California Building Standards Code and modifications thereto, by July 1, 1999. It is essential that the City have in effect on that date codes that comport with state law and contain those modifications necessitated by unique topographic, geologic and climatic conditions. In the absence of immediate effectiveness, the provisions of the Building, Electrical, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes unique to the City's special circumstances will not be in place and this will have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety and welfare. The modifications to the Codes contain vital provisions regarding administrative procedures, fire- extinguishing systems, roofing materials, foundation thickness, air ducts, nonmetallic-sheathed cable, and other similar matters necessitated by the City 's proximity to active earthquake fault zones, the City's exposure to Santa Ana winds, and the City's limited rainfall in summer and fall months. For these reasons, the public health, safety and welfare require that this ordinance take effect on July 1, 1999 as an Urgency Ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 36934 and 36937. SECTION VI: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance SECTION VII: This ordinance shall become operative on July 1, 1999. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Orals\95-14 11 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CAL~ORNIA BUHJ~ING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMF~NT OF DANGEROUS BUILr}INGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION I: Chapter 15.00 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 15.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula: California Building Code, 1998 Edition (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); Be California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); C. California Plumbing Code, 1998 Edition (Part 5 of Ti~e 24 of the California Code of Regulations); California Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; F. Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, OtdaX95-14 I published by the International Conference of Building Officials Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; and A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such codes are in force. 15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read as follows: Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read as follows: All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid city business licenses. Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the California Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. E. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety. Ords\95-14 2 F. Section 304.1 is amended by adding the following exception: Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area, for the purpose of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less. G. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core CIRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background. H. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with this Section and Fire Code Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with the Fire Code. I. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows: Where required An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. [For SFM] For special provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium, Orals\95-14 3 and calcium carbide, see the Fire Code. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see the Fire Code. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the fife area square footage as listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR Part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR Part 9. I. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Orda\95-14 4 Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the fire department, shall sound an audible signal at a constan~y attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. Exception: 1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. I. Section 1503 is hereby mended to read as follows: Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504, except that no roof covering shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly. Exception: 1. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. 2. The roof covering of any structure located on a parcel with a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof covering of not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approved by the Building Official. 3. The roof covering of all re-roofing shall conform to the applicable provisions of this Section as amended herein, except that the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the remainder of the roof. Ords\95-14 5 Section 1924 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2) inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) mil moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover. Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217. Section 1924 is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new paragraph to read as follows: Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches in length. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 para_m'aph 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the barrier that faces away from the swimming pool. The following appendices are deleted in their entirety from the 1998 Califomia Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23, 30, 33, 34. 15.t)4,030 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly Ords\95-14 6 incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.040 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 211 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not connect direc~y with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system. Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code Ords~5-14 7 Eo Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code. F. Section 719.5 is hereby mended to read as follows: Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap' or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular traffic. G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a twenty-four (24) hour graph test wimessed by the jurisdiction. H. Section 1211.3 is hereby mended by adding the following exceptions: Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approved by the Building Official. Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix J - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings is hereby deleted in its entirety. 15.04.050 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 904 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following: Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted. ) Where spare circuit protective devices are provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the Otds\95-14 8 bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then neeways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official. Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used. D. Section 336-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-4Co), and shall only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade. 15.04.060 Unlform Admlnt~trative Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B® Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. Orals\95-14 9 Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. 15.04,070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Building. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. 15.04,080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. SECTION H: All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION IH: To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. Ords\95-14 10 SECTION IV: If an section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION V: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance SECTION VI: This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following the date of adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATFEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Ofda\95-14 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99--00 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ,1999, by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Ords\95-14 12 ITEM 23 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAI~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ,/J~illiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22, 1999 Proposed Traffic Signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road. BACKGROUND: At the March 12, 1998 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission reviewed a request for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road. A petition signed by approximately 300 parents requesting a traffic signal at this intersection was submitted to the Commission at this meeting. Staff conducted a comprehensive analysis of the existing conditions at this intersection, and determined that a traffic signal was warranted at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road. Therefore, based on the warrant analysis and the petition, staff recommended that installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's Signal Priority List, and an "All-Way Stop" control be established as an intedm traffic control for this intersection. After receiving public testimony, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommended installation of an "All-Way Stop" control at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road as an interim measure. Recently, staff conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis, and determined that currently the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road satisfies seven (7) of the eleven (11) signal warrants. It should be noted that satisfying any one (1) of the eleven (11) warrants could be justification for installation of a traffic signal. Currently this intersection is ranked Number One (1) on the City's Signal Priority List and we anticipate that with the increased traffic volumes on Margarita Road the need for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection will increase. Although the existing "Stop" signs on Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road provide a safe crossing for Sparkman Elementary School students, the "Stop" signs require all vehicles on Margarita Road (approximately 17,000 vehicles per day) to stop 24 hours a day, even when no pedestrians or vehicles cross Margarita Road. Less than ten (10) students cross Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road during a typical morning. A traffic signal can also provide a safe crossing for pedestrians and vehicles without stopping all vehicles at all times. The unnecessary stop and go at stop intersections results in increased delay, air pollution, gas consumption and noise and contributes to a general disregard to traffic control devices. These adverse effects will increase with regional growth and development in the area. 1 r:~agdrptL99~O622~oq~cosignaYajp Our records indicate that there have been no accidents involving pedestrians at any of the approximately 50 signals within the City limits. These signals include intersections which provide crossing for Temecula Elementary School, Margarita Middle School and Temecula Valley High School on Margarita Road; Vail Elementary School on Rancho Vista Road; and Chaparral High School on Winchester Road. At the May 25, 1999 City Council meeting Mr. Kenneth Ray requested delaying the installation of this signal based on his opinion that motorists would speed-up through this signal to beat red lights, and that if Meadows Parkway was constructed to Highway 79 South that the signal would not be warranted. The Developers of the Paseo del Sol project have indicated that Meadows Parkway will be improved and connected to Highway 79 South by November 1999. Our Traffic Division has reviewed the existing traffic patterns in this area. When Meadows Parkway is connected to Highway 79 South it will not influence the warrants for this signal. Further we have met with Temecula Valley Unified School District, Forest Thomas, Director of Transportation, Dave Allmen, Superintendent of Schools, and Karen Johnson, Principal of Sparkman Elementary School and they concur with our recommendation to install this signal at this time. Another consideration regarding traffic speed on Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road is that the 25 MPH School Zone will remain after the signal is installed. Staff recommends traffic signals which will provide safe pedestrian crossing in a more efficient manner than "Stop" signs. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit "A" Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" March 12, 1998 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report 3. Letter - Temecula Valley Unified School District r:\agdrptL99\0622~ep~oslgnaVajp TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT ¢. a B. ,Allmen June 11, 1999 Mr. William G. Hughes 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RECEIVED JUN I 6 1999 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT S, OAR2 j.: -22 _Z-ATJON ~::! SRqJth Shajer £~ E!der HOODS 7oo~<er Dear Bill, On June 10, 1999, Forrest Thomas, Karen Johnson, Principal of Sparkman Elementary, and myself, met with you and All Moghadam regarding the signalizing of the intersection at Pio Pico and Margarita. After review, the Temecula Valley Unified School District is in agreement with the plan. I apologize to you, your staff, and the Council on the way a member of the community represented our District. It will not happen again. ~~B. AIIme~~nn Superintendent cc: All Moghadam 31350 Ranc~o Vjsta Road Temecula. CA 92592, 909) 676-2661 EXHIBIT "A" - LOCATION MAP TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 Item 5 Request for Installation of Traffic Signal - Intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's Signal Priority List and consider installation of an "All-Way Stop" at this location as an interim traffic control device. BACKGROUND: At the January 15, 1998 regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission received a letter and a verbal request to consider installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road and directed staff to place this item on the next meeting agenda. Margarita Road is designated as a four-lane arterial roadway on the General Plan Circulation Element. Currently, Margarita Road in this vicinity is a three (3) lane roadway with left-turn pockets at Pio Pico Road. Margarita Road is improved to the ultimate width including curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side only. This intersection is controlled by "Stop" signs on Pio Pico Road and the traffic on Margarita Road is not required to stop. There are school crosswalks on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road, and on Pio Pico Road east of Margarita Road in front of Sparkman Elementary School. A horizontal curve exists on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road; however, the sight distance is adequate. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Margarita Road and 30 MPH on Pio Pico Road west of Margarita Road. Also, "SCHOOL - SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH - WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT" signs have been installed on Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road in both directions near the school. Staff has conducted a comprehensive study of this intersection including vehicular and pedestrian volume counts, speed data analysis, sight distance measurements, traffic collision data analysis and warrant analysis for traffic signals, "Stop" signs and flashing yellow school signals (Exhibit "B"). The intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road meets one (1) of the eleven (11) warrants (peak hour volume) for installation of a traffic signal, therefore, this intersection will be included in the City's Signal Priority List for future consideration. There has been one (1) reported accident within the last twelve (12) month period at this intersection. However, the minimum volume portion of the warrants for installation of an "All-Way Stop" is met. Therefore, an "All-Way Stop" at this intersection could be considered as an interim traffic control device. In addition, the design for installation of yellow flashing beacons at schools has been completed and the lights should be in place by July, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Letter of Request 3. Exhibit "C" - Warrant Analysis and Supporting Data ITEM 24 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council '~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22, 1999 Award of Construction Contract for Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersections of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road, Project No. PW98-12 and Margarita Road at Pauba Road, Project No. PW98-13 PREPARED BY: Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a construction contract for the installation of traffic signals at the intersections of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road, Project No. PW98-12, and Margarita Road at Pauba, Project No. PW98-13 to DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California, in the amount of $219,467.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the contingency amount of $21,946.70, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Accelerate appropriation of budgeted funds in FY 1999-2000 to FY 1998-1999 in the amount of $85,900.00 to construction Account No. 210-165-700-5804. BACKGROUND: The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road and Margarita Road at Pauba Road was approved by City Council in the Fiscal Year 1998/99 Capital Improvement Program. Presently, both intersections are controlled by four-way stop signs. The eastside of the westbound lanes for the intersection of Margarita Road at Pauba Road will be widened to accommodate a right-tum pocket. In order to fast track the construction of these traffic signals, the City has elected to purchase the traffic signal poles and controller assembly in advance of the construction contract, therefore those items are not included with this contract award. At the present time the traffic signal poles require a 10-12 week lead-time. It is anticipated that the advance purchase will reduce the total time required to complete the project In the event the City Council chooses to delay the Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road traffic signal, Project No. PW98-12, it would be recommended that the City Council: 1. Award Margarita Road at Pauba Road traffic signal in the amount of $86,792.00 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,679.20, which is equal to the 10% contract amount. 1 r:~agdrpt\99M:)622\pw98-12-13award/ajp The engineers estimate for this project was $251,500. Six (6) bids were results: received and were publicly opened on June 10, 1999, with the Pio Pico & Pauba Pauba Only following 1, DBX, Inc. 2. Highlight Electric 3. Computer Service Company 4. Maverick Electric, Inc. 5. T & M Electric, Inc. 6. Traffic Loops Crackfilling, Inc. $219,467.00 $225,650.00 $228,073.00 $238,000.00 $238,230.00 $244,130.00 $132,675.00 $136,850.00 $134,836.00 $138,000.00 $133,230.00 $138,630.00 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found DBX, Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. DBX, Inc. has satisfactorily completed other projects for the City in the past, including the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas. The specifications allow ninety (90) working days for completion of the project. Work is expected to be completed by December 1999. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project funded through Development Impact Fees (DIF) - Signal Mitigation and DIF - Street Improvements. Adequate funds are available for the accelerated appropriation amount. ATTACHMENTS: Contract r:\agdrpt\99~)622\pw98-12-13award/ajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PIIV98-f2 & PW98-13 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 22nd day of June, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW98- 12 and PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD, MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW98-12 and PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD, MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Ovedand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW98- 12 & PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD, and MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed CONTRACT CA-1 R:\CIRPROJECTS\PW98\PW98-13\contracI and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW98-12 & PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents herein above enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED NINETEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY SEVEN DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($219,467.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ninety (90) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Ao Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. CONTRACT CA-2 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW98~PW98.-13~contract UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $50O,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over$500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or CONTRACT CA-3 R:\CIP\PROJECTS%PW98\PW98-13~contracl 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW98\PW98-13~contract 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covedng disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any wdtten notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: CONTRACT CA-5 R:\CIP\PROJECTS%PW98%PW98-13%contract William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Ddve Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above wdtten. DATED: CONTRACTOR: DBX, Inc. 42066 Avenida Alvarado, Suite C Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 676-0115 By: Jim Perry, Owner DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW98%PW98-13%contract ITEM 25 CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council .-~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 22, 1999 Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 TO FINANCE RECREATIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS BACKGROUND: Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City of Temecula's Parks/Lighting Services special tax approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. The purpose of the Parks/Lighting Services special tax is to provide for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the City's public park and recreation facilities, recreational and human services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals. The Parks/Street Lighting Services special tax will is levied in the same manner, at the same time as the TCSD Rates and Charges, and collected on the annual property tax bills for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The maximum annual tax has been established at 974.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit; 955.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, 9148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, 9297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non- residential zone, 9446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, 9148.88 per acre of golf course property, and 937.22 per acre for agricultural uses. For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, the total operating budget for parks, recreation, medians, and arterial street lighting services is 94,589,710. The total possible revenue received at the r:\yasinobk\parktax.99 062299 current rate from all taxable parcels within the City for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is $2,592,190. The difference in operating costs over levy revenue is offset by fund balance transfers, recreational revenues and user fees, and Rest Program contributions. Pursuant to City Ordinance 96-21, the City Council is also empowered to establish the amount of the tax levy each fiscal year, approved by the voters, not to exceed the maximum tax rates identified above. As a result, it is recommended that the amounts to be levied as a special tax for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, be less than the maximum amounts established by City Ordinance No. 96-21, in the following manner: $ 68.44 per single family residential dwelling unit $ 51.34 per multi-family residential dwelling unit $136.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone $273.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $410.64 per acre of non-residential improved property $136.88 per acre of golf course property $ 34.22 per acre of agricultural property In keeping with the City Council's continued practice of trying to reduce fees to our property owners whenever possible, and even though it is allowable for the City Council to approve this year's Special Tax at the maximum rate, the above recommended Special Tax is a $5.20 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) savings from the maximum rate of $74.44 per EDU. In addition, this is the fifth consecutive year that the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST) program has contributed to the overall reduction in the rates for parks, recreation, and street lighting services. FISCAL IMPACT: The Special Tax levy at the proposed rates will generate $2,592,190. The remaining funds necessary to complete the Parks/Lighting Services budget will be derived from fund balance, recreation revenue, user fees, and general fund contributions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to Levy Special Tax. r:\yadnobk\parktex.99 062299 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~IECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, M'F. FsIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula appmved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year 1997-98. Section 2. The maximum mount of said special tax for each fiscal year as established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of goff course property, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. Section 3. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to establish the mounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in mounts not to exceed the maximum mounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the Ordinance. Section 4. The City Council hereby determines that the following mounts are required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following mounts to be levied as a special tax for fiscal year 1999-2000, which mounts are less than the maximum mounts established by Ordinance No. 96-21 and approved by voters: $ 68.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit $ 51.34 per multi-family residential dwelling unit $136.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone $273.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $410. 64 per acre of non-residential improved property $136.88 per acre of goff course property $ 34.22 per acre of agricultural property R:\yasinobk\parktax.reso 062299 Section 5. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shah be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to the special tax, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. Section 6. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of financing recreational and human services programs, and the operation, maintenance, and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith. Section 7. The special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1999, the property tax roll with the special tax enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of such special tax as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax challenges or questions the levy of the special tax against such property owner's property, such property owner must appeal the levy by f~ing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the City. Section 10. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special tax for fiscal year 1999-2000 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by f~ing a hardship appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the City, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdic- tion, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City R:\yasinobk\parktax.reao 2 062299 Council does hereby declaxe that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions hereof are declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROV~X} AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27d day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HE1HmY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- __ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMB~ COUNCIL MEMBERS COUNCIL MENIB~ COUNCIL MEMBERS R:\yaslnobk\pm'hx .re, so 3 062299 ITEM 26 APPROVAL TY ATTORNEY RECTOR OF FINANC ITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council June 22, 1999 Approval of Election Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CALUNG AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES 3. Adopt a resolution entiUed: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING, CALLING AND GMNG NOTICE OF AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMEBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Elections Code, a municipality may request of the County Registrar of Voters to consolidate with the General Election, to conduct the Municipal Election, to canvass the retums of the General Municipal Election, and to hold the election in all respects as if there were only one election. This request must be made in the form of a resolution, which delegates the powers and duties of the Bection Officer for the City of Temecula to the County Elections DepartmenL This delegation does not include services routinely conducted by the City Clerk such as advertising requirements for filing pedods and all campaign filings including nomination papers and campaign statements. The second resolution that the Coundl is being asked to adopt is the formal resolution calling and giving notice of the election. This is a requirement of the State of Califomia Election Code relating to General Law Cities. It also authorizes the City Clerk to give notice of the election in the time, form and manner required by the Election Code. The third resolution that the Council is being asked to adopt is the resolution calling and giving notice of the election to annex the Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, and to levy a special tax and rates and charges within the annexed territory. The resolution authorizes the City Clerk to give notice of the election and requests the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to approve consolidation of the election with the Countys general election on November 2, 1999. FISCAL IMPACT: Budget. ATTACHMENTS: $50,000 has been budgeted for the election in the FY 1999/2000 Operating Resolution No. 99- Resolution No. 99- Resolution No. 99- Requesting the Services of the Registrar Calling Election Annexation RESOLUTION NO. 99-__. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, t999, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES. WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 2, 1999, for the election of Municipal Officers; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of Califomia relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Temecula, California, on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing two (2) Members of the City Council for the full term of four years. Section 2. required by law. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as Section 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, pdnted matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphemalia that may be necessary in order to propedy and lawfully conduct the election. Section 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'ciock AM on the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock PM of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. Resos~9- I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this the 22rid day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [se q STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R~e~lS- 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999 WHEREAS, the City Coundl of the City of Temecula, Califomia, has called a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, for the purpose of the election of two (2) members of the City Coundl and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of Riverside canvass the retums of the General Munidpal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to Sections 22003 and 23302 of the Elections Code of the State of Califomia, the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to conduc~ the General Municipal Election in consolidation with the statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, for the purpose of the election of two (2) Members of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula. Section 2. That, except for those services routinely conducted by the City Clerk, delegation is hereby made to the county elections depadment of the powers and duties of the elections officer for the City of Temecula to conduct said election in accordance with all applicable laws and procedures. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used for each of the two (2) affected Councilmanic positions. Section 3. That, in all particulars not redted in this Resolution, said election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in said City. Section 4. That the City of Temecula recognizes that additional costs will be incun'ed by the County, by reason of this consolidation, and agrees to reimburse the County for such additional costs. Section 5. That the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election, in time form and manner as required. Section 6. That said Registrar of Voters is heraby authorized to canvass the retums of said General Municipal Election. Section 7. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors, the county elections depadrnent of the County of Riverside and with the County Clerk. Resos~99- 1 Section 8. The City Clerk shall cedify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Re~o~. 2 RESOLUTION NO, 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article XIIIA, Article XIIIC, and Article XIilD of the California Constitution, and pursuant to Resolution No. 38-98 of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside (LAFCO), them is hereby called and ordered to be held within the territory to be annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District as part of the reorganization designated as LAFCO No. 98-14-1 on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, an advisory election and a spedal election for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of such territory an advisory measure regarding the proposed annexation, a proposition authorizing the City to levy a spedal tax within such territory, and a proposition authorizing the Temecula Community Services Distdct to adopt rates and charges within such territory. Section 2. The advisory measure to be submitted to all of the voters in the area to be annexed shall be substantially as follows: ADVISORY VOTE ONLY ANNEXATION: Shall the parcels in the Vail Ranch annexation area be annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Yes Services District, contingent upon 2/3 voter approval of the City's special tax and Temecula Community Services District's rates and charges on this ballot? No Re~os~gg- 1 Section 3. The propositions to be submitted to the voters of the Vail Ranch spedtic plan area sham be substantially as follows: PARKS, RECREATION, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING AND ARTERIAL LIGHTING SPECIAL TAX (TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED): Shall Ordinance No. of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent with the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, artedal street lights and traffic signals? Yes No REFUSE COLLECTION, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING RATES AND CHARGES (TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED): Shall Resolution No. of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Vail Ranch annexation area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting, slope maintenance, and refuse collection services? Yes No Section 4. The propositions to be submitted to the voters of the Redhawk specific plan area shall be substantially as follows: PARKS, RECREATION, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING AND ARTERIAL UGHTING SPECIAL TAX (TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED): Shall Ordinance No. of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent with the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, artedal street lights and traffic signals? Yes No REFUSE COLLECTION, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING RATES AND CHARGES (TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED): Shall Resolution No. of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Redhawk annexation area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting, slope maintenance, and refuse collection services? Yes No Resos~9- 2 Section 5. The text of the proposed ordinance to be submitted to the voters is attached hemto as Exhibit A and incorporated hersin by reference. The type of tax, the rate of tax, and the method of collection are stated therein. Section 6. The text of the proposed resolution to be submitted to the voters is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. Section 7. The polls for the election shall be open at seven o'dock a.m. of the day of the election and shell remain open continuously from that time until eight o'dock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be dosed, except as provided in Elections Code Section 14401. Section 8. In all particulars not redted in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding City elections. Section 9, Notice of the time and place of holding the election is hereby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in the time, form and manner as required by law. Section 10. Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 9603 and 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of the advisory election and spedal election with the County's regular election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1999. Section 11, The Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of the advisory election and spedal election. Section 12, Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to issue instructions to the County Registrar of Voters and all County officers charged with duties pertaining to the statewide election to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election, including the preparation of necessary materials. Section 13, The City shall reimburse the County of Riverside for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a propedy approved bill. Section 14. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments. Section 15. The City Council, the officers and staff of the City and the City's legal counsel are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election. ReIOS~9- 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote: ' AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ITEM 27 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Shawn O. Nelson, Acting City Manager June 22, 1999 Review and Adoption of the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget Genie Roberts, Director of ~inn~e~~recto Tim McDermott, Assistant r ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution 99- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS Adopt Resolution 99- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE POSITIONS OF THE CITY OF OF AUTHORIZED Adopt Resolution 99- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 1999-00 DISCUSSION: Attached is the proposed FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget. The budget includes revenue projections and expenditure requests for the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and Internal Service Funds. The City of Temecula remains in healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance Department's revised estimates of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it appears that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures should be approximately $2.5 million less than the budgeted appropriation amounts. The proposed FY 1999-00 budget is a balanced budget, with estimated revenues exceeding estimated expenditures (before operating transfers out) by $1,745,390. The City's reserve for economic uncertainties will be increased by $881,691 to over $7.4 million (which represents 30% of the proposed budgeted General Fund expenditures for FY 1999-00). This budget will provide increased service levels for the residents of Temecula, while at the same time maintaining the City's record of fiscal responsibility. Budget Highlights The attached "FY 1999-00 Proposed Operating Budget Summary" provides a detailed discussion by operating department of the proposed operating budget. Following is a recap of the significant highlights of the proposed operating budget. Estimated General Fund revenues for FY 1999-00 total $26,521,800, which represents a $3,086,500 increase (13.2%) over the current fiscal year estimates. The single largest increase anticipated is for sales tax revenue, which is projected to total $12,487,000 in 1999-00, a $2t087,000 increase (20.1%) from the current year estimate. This increase is primarily due to sales tax that will be generated from the Promenade Mall, power center, and associated retail development. Proposed General Fund operating expenditures total $24,776,41 O, which represents an increase of $2,888,870 (13.2%) from the current fiscal year appropriations. A 16.1% increase in public safety costs is reflected in the proposed budget. The increases include the addition of four sworn police officers (two patrol, one traffic, and one special enforcement/narcotics officer). Also included is funding for a six-person paramedic team. Both police and fire contract costs been impacted by pay increases approved by the State and County. Substantial increases are reflected in public works and capital improvement program administration costs due to staffing increases approved at mid-year FY 1998-99 and in response to City Council's emphasis on traffic and circulation improvements. An increase of $325,980 in the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST") program contribution is proposed, bringing the FY 1999-00 contribution to $1,176,000. No change is proposed in the "Measure C" special tax rate (currently $68.44 per household). A $385,000 increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement is projected, primarily due to the increase in sales tax revenue that will be generated by the Promenade Mall and related development. 2 A $725,000 operating transfer of General Fund reserves is proposed for the City's capital improvement project program. A $233,000 operating transfer is proposed to fund the replacement of computer workstations. A total of 10 positions are proposed to be added to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. "Gann" Aoorooriations Limit In accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the City Council is required to adopt by resolution the "Gann" Appropriations Limit on an annual basis. The Appropriation Limitation creates a restriction on the amount of revenue which can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The Limit is increased each year based on the growth of population, inflation, and non-residential assessed valuation Using population data provided by the State Department of Finance, and assessed valuation information provided by the City's property tax consultant HdL, Coren & Cone, the City's Appropriations Limit for FY 1999-00 has been computed to be $28,878,773. Appropriations subject to the limit in the proposed FY 1999-00 budget total $19,675,664 which is $9,203,109 less than the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non-tax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants, or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources could not exceed the $9,203,109 variance indicated above. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $9,203,109 from the budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limit, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years, or voter approval to increase the City's Appropriations Limit. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed FY 1999-00 operating budget is a balanced budget that provides for an excess of General Fund revenues over operating expenditures of $1,745,390 (before operating transfers). Operating transfers out are proposed to set aside reserves for use in funding capital projects and computer workstation replacements. The total General Fund fund balance is projected to be $12,965,999 at June 30, 1999, of which $7,432,923 (30% of annual General Fund expenditures) is recommended to be designated for economic uncertainties. Attachments: -FY 1999-00 Proposed Operating Budget Summary -Resolution No. 99- -Resolution No. 99- -Resolution No. 99- -Schedule of Authorized Positions -Proposed FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget CITY OF TEMECULA FY 1999-00 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY CURRENT CONDITIONS The City of Temecula remains in healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance Department's revised estimate of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it appears that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures should be approximately $2.5 million less than the budgeted appropriation amounts. GENERAL FUND REVENUES The total projected General Fund revenues for FY 1999-00 reflect a $3,086,500 or 13.2% increase from the FY 1998-99 revised revenue estimates. The highlights are summarized below: $2,087,000 increase in sales tax (to $12,487,000) $1,023,000 increase in capital improvement program reimbursements (due to increases in CIP Administration expenditures initiated at mid-year FY 1998-99 and as proposed in this budget) $174,700 increase in motor vehicle in lieu revenue $136,500 increase in franchise fees 2% increase in property taxes is projected $337,500 decrease in community development related fees (due to a slight reduction projected in new building valuation) $175,000 reduction in investment interest due to the anticipated use of General Fund reserves for various capital improvement projects GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES The proposed budget reflects an increase in General Fund expenditures of $2,888,870 or 13.2% from the FY 1998-99 budget. The primary increases affecting the General Fund include: 1 ) police contract costs due to the net addition of four positions, 2) fire contract costs due to the addition of a paramedic team, 3) public works personnel costs due to staffing increases approved at mid-year FY 1998-99, 4) an increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement due regional mall related retail development, and 5) an increase in the 'REST" contribution. Personnel costs increases are included to reflect a 3% across the board increase in salaries (per the City's current labor agreement). A total of 10 additions to the schedule of authorized personnel is proposed. A summary of these positions is as follows: A'~RD~COUNC/L SUIIARY 4 AGENDADOC 1 Deot. Position Finance Planning Planning Building & Safety Building & Safety Public Works Public Works TCSD TCSD Accounting Assistant Associate Planner GIS Analyst Deputy Building Official Building Inspector II Maintenance Supervisor Associate Engineer Lead Maintenance Workers (2) Landscape Inspector The reclassification of the City Manager Department Office Specialist to an Administrative Secretary is proposed. Also proposed is a restructuring of the Community Development Department to move the Community Development Technicians from Planning to Building & Safety, and the transfer of the Senior Management Analyst from the City Manager's Department to the Public Works Department. Following is a summary of the significant items by department in the FY 1999-00 proposed budget: City Council ) $10,000 included for the City's 10t' anniversary celebration Community Suooort Community Services Funding included at .75% of the General Fund budget City Manager Personnel costs include provision for payments to prior City Manager through 9/99 (including final cash out) Personnel costs reflect the reallocation of 50% of the Assistant to the City Manager to this department budget Economic Develooment ) Sponsorships have been included at the current year funding levels ) Overall decrease proposed of over $77,000 City Clerk $50,000 is included for election costs Citv Attorney $52,500 decrease is proposed Finance ) Includes the conversion of an existing full-time project Accounting Assistant position to a regular authorized position Human Resources ) Personnel cost reduction is reflected due to the 50% reallocation of the Assistant to the City Manager to the City Manager Department budget A'tWORD~COUNC~L SUMMARY 4 AGENOADOC 2 Planning )~ Personnel costs include the addition of two authorized positions (Associate Planner, GIS Analyst) ), Reflects the transfer of Community Development Techs to Building & Safety Buildino & Safety Personnel costs reflect the addition of two authorized positions (Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector II) Temporary/Project Help reflect the addition of inspection staff for mall-related issues Reflects the transfer of two Community Development Techs from the Planning Department and one Community Development Tech from Engineering Includes request for one light truck for inspection staff to replace existing propane- fueled truck En¢iineering Personnel costs reflect the transfer of a Community Development Tech to the Building & Safety Department Temporary/Project Help reflect a full-time project inspector Public Works Personnel costs reflect to addition of two authorized personnel (Maintenance Supervisor, Associate Engineering) )' Includes request for a new full sized truck for the proposed Maintenance Supervisor ~ $250,000 has been included for 'Category 1' traffic improvements CIP Administration ~ A total increase of $549,380 is proposed ~ Personnel costs reflect a full year of funding for the positions added at mid-year 1998-99 Police ~ The following modifications are proposed to contract staffing levels: Additions 2 Patrol Officers 2 Special Enforcement Team Officers I Traffic Officer Reductions I Narcotics Task Force Officer A 12 % rate increase is reflected (due to County labor agreement) $49,100 is included for special event-related police service costs Firq $571,180 increase in Fire Services contract costs due to the addition of a paramedic team (annual cost of $453,500) and a pay increase for State employees Restructure of a Fire Captain position from Station 73 to a Deputy Fire Marshall is proposed (no net cost to the City) Includes request for one light truck or vehicle for fire prevention staff. Animal Control ), No change A:~WORDIC(XeMP.,i, SUMNARY 4 AGENDA DOC 3 Non-Departmental A $385,000 increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement (due primarily to new mall-related retail development) The 'REST" program contribution to TCSD is proposed to be increased from $850,020 to $1,176,000 (a $325,980 increase) Ooeratino Transfers Out A transfer to the Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $725,000 is proposed (from anticipated available fund balance at June 30, 1999) A transfer to the Information Systems Internal Service Fund in the amount of $233,000 is proposed for computer workstation replacements FUNDBALANCE Due to anticipated expenditure savings in the current fiscal year, it is estimated that the June 30, 1999 fund balance will be approximately $2.5 million higher than originally expected. The proposed FY 1999-00 budget provides for an excess of revenues over expenditures in the amount of $1,745,390. After reflecting all anticipated reserves of fund balance (and increasing the 30% reserve for economic uncertainties by $881,691 to $7.4 million), the proposed budget provides for $1,544,339 in undesignated, available fund balance. 4 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Following is a discussion of significant items in the proposed Internal Service Fund budgets: Insurance :~ No significant changes Vehicles :> New/replacement vehicle purchases are detailed in the summary section for each requesting department Information Systems )> An increase in Temp/Project Help of approximately $64,000 is proposed. The following positions are proposed: Information Systems Tech (full-time) Management Assistant/"Webmaster" (part-time) Video Production Tech (part-time) $8,000 is proposed for possible Y2K contingency needs $232,500 is proposed for the replacement of 93 computer workstations The charge-back to departments has been increased to build reserves for future equipment replacement and expansion of equipment needs Suooort Services )> $10,000 in capital outlay is proposed for a copier for the Maintenance Facility Facilities )> No significant changes A:WOP, D~COUNCIL SUMNARY 4 AGENDA DO C 5 RgSOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CTFY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISRING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY 1999-00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: /~ No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager. C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of fimds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at hne 30, 1999 are here~oy appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1999-00. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22~a day of June, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SE~L] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Ternecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula thereof held on the 22 day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City at a regular meeting ~d Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF TnIP~ CITY OF TEMECUIA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS WlnP~REAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.12.030 of the City s Municipal Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies: and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The attached Schedule of ,Authorized Positions is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Governrnent Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Schedule of,Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 1999, and may be thereafter amended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of ,Authorized Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies. Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22"d day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven I. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly and regfiady adopted by the City Council of the City of T emecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22'l day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CTrY COUNCIL OF TRF~ CITY OF TEMECUIA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 1999-00 WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Proposition 4) on November 6, 1979, adding Article XIII B to the Constitution of the State of California to establish and define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities; WHEREAS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article XIII B by defining various terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing body of each local jurisdiction of its appropriations limits; WHF~REAS, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for FY 1999- 00 have been performed by the Finance Department and are on file with the office of the City Clerk, and available for public review; WHEREAS, these computations are provided on Exhibit "A' which is herein incorporated by reference and attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY 1999-00 is hereby adopted. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22~d day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22'a day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA COMPUTATION OF GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FY 1992-93 Appropriations Limit ..............................................................$10,109,911 FY 1993-94 Population Change* ........................................................................8.25% FY 1993-94 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ................................................2.72% Cumulative Compound (1.0825 x 1.0272) .........................................................11.19% FY 1993-94 Appropriations Limit ..............................................................$11,241,655 FY 1994-95 Population Change* .........................................................................8.15% FY 1994-95 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation * * ............................... 21.7 % Cumulative Compound (1.0815 x 1.2170) ..........................................................31.61 % FY 1994-95 Appropriations Limit ...............................................................$14,796,098 FY 1995-96 City Population Change* ................................................................10.49% FY 1995-96 Per Capita Personal Income Change* .................................................4.72% Cumulative Compound (1.1049 x 1.0472) ..........................................................15.71% FY 1995-96 Appropriations Limit ...............................................................$17, 119, 161 FY 1996-97 City Population Change* ..................................................................6.54% FY 1996-97 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation * * ............................. 17.07% Cumulative Compound (1.0654 x 1.1707) ..........................................................24.73% FY 1996-97 Appropriations Limit ...............................................................$21,352, 109 FY 1997-98 City Population Change* ................................. 3.01% FY 1997-98 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ......................... 4.67% Cumulative Compound (1.0301 x 1.0467) .............................. 7.82% F Y 1997-98 Appropriation Limit ................................ $23,021,965 FY 1998-99 City Population Change* ................................. 6.41% FY 1998-99 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ......................... 4.15% Cumulative Compound (1.0641 x 1.0415) .............................. 10.83% FY 1998-99 Appropriation Limit ................................. $25,514,326 FY 1999-00 City Population Change* .................................. 4.88% FY 1999-00 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ................... 7.92% Cumulative Compound (1.0488 x 1.0792) .............................. 13.19% FY 1999-00 Appropriation Limit ................................. $28,878,773 *Source: State of California Department of Finance * *Source: HdL Coren & Cone City Of Temecula June 17, 1999 Schedule Of Authorized Positions As Of July 1, 1999 Buildin~ & Safety Administrative Secretary Building Inspector I Building Inspector II Chief Building Official Code Enforcement Officer Community Development Technician Deputy Building Official Office Specialist Plan Checker/Building Insp. Senior Building Inspector Building & Safety Subtotals City Clerk Administrative Secretary Administrative Technician City Clerk/Director Of Support Servic Deputy Director Of Support Services Information Systems Administrator Information Systems Specialist Office Assistant Office Specialist Records Coordinator City Clerk Subtotals City Council City Council City Council Subtotals Authorized Count Minimum 1.00 $2,309 1.00 $2,567 3.00 $2,862 1.00 $5,666 2.00 $2,787 4.00 $2,602 1.00 $4,510 1.00 $1,758 1.00 $3,212 1.00 $3,451 16.00 1.00 $2,309 1.00 $1,687 1.00 $5,642 1.00 $3,879 1.00 $3,834 1.00 $3,416 1.00 $1,607 1.00 $1,758 1.00 $2,281 9.00 5.00 5.00 Exempt/ Maximum Nonexempt $2,879 NE $3,200 NE $3,566 NE $6,868 E $3,475 NE $3,245 NE $5,493 E $2,193 NE $3,916 NE $4,306 E $2,879 NE $2,104 NE $6,878 E $4,840 E $4,784 E $4,164 E $2,006 NE $2,193 NE $2,843 NE $300 $300 E Page I of 4 City Of Temecula June 17, 1999 Schedule Of Authorized Positions As Of July 1, 1999 .City Manaper Administrative Secretary Assistant City Manager Asst. To The City Manager City Manager Deputy City Manager Executive Assistant Human Resources Assistant Human Resources Specialist Management Analyst Marketing Coordinator City Manager Subtotals Community Services Administrative Secretary Custodian Deputy Dir. Of Comm. Svcs. Development Services Administrator Development Services Analyst Director Of Community Services Facility Maintenance Coordinator Landscape Inspector Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Maintenance Worker Museum Services Manager Office Assistant Recreation Coordinator Recreation Superintendent Recreation Supervisor Senior Landscape Inspector Community Services Subtotals Authorized Count Minimum Maximum 1.00 $2,309 $2,879 1.00 $6,892 $8,396 1.00 $4,632 $5,646 1.00 $0 $8,497 2.00 $6,562 $7,996 1.00 $2,865 $3,571 1.00 $2,298 $2,801 1.00 $2,529 $3,153 1.00 $3,184 $3,879 1.00 $3,392 $4,132 11.00 1.00 $2,309 $2,879 1.00 $1,664 $2,077 1.00 $4,567 $5,566 1.00 $3,890 $4,853 1.00 $2,896 $3,612 1.00 $6,034 $7,351 1.00 $2,236 $2,787 1.00 $2,550 $3,104 2.00 $2,264 $2,827 1.00 $3,999 $4,987 1.00 $3,411 $4,157 2.00 $2,002 $2,496 1.00 $2,903 $3,623 3.00 $1,607 $2,006 3.00 $2,032 $2,532 1.00 $3,879 $4,840 2.00 $2,825 $3,522 1.00 $2,93 1 $3,571 25.00 Exempt/ Nonexempt NE E E E E E NE E E E NE NE E E NE E NE NE NE E E NE NE NE NE E NE NE Page 2 of 4 City Of Temecula June 17, 1999 Schedule Of Authorized Positions As Of July 1, 1999 Finance Accountant Accounting Assistant Accounting Specialist Administrative Secretary Assistant Finance Director Director Of Finance Purchasing Specialist Senior Accountant Senior Management Analyst Finance Subtotals Plannino Administrative Secretary Assistant Planner Associate Planner Community Development Aide Development Processing Coordinator GIS Analyst Office Assistant Planning Manager Senior Planner Planning Subtotals Authorized Count Minimum Maximum 1.00 $2,903 $3,623 2.00 $1,834 $2,288 2.50 $2,181 $2,720 1.00 $2,309 $2,879 1.00 $4,529 $5,519 1.00 $6,153 $7,497 1.00 $2,200 $2,680 1.00 $3,623 $4,413 1.00 $3,734 $4,658 11.50 1.00 $2,309 $2,879 1.00 $3,025 $3,770 2.00 $3,512 $4,378 1.00 $2,222 $2,708 1.00 $3,179 $3,874 1.00 $2,848 $3,468 1.00 $1,607 $2,006 1.00 $4,562 $5,694 2.00 $4,040 $5,041 11.00 Exempt/ Nonexempt NE NE NE NE E E NE E E NE NE NE NE NE E NE E E Page 3 of 4 City Of Temecula June 17, 1999 Schedule Of Authorized Positions As Of July 1, 1999 Authorized Count Minimum Public Works Acting Director Of public Works/City 1.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 Assistant Engineer 7.00 Associate Engineer 5.00 Deputy Director Public Works 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 3.00 Maintenance Superintendent 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 Maintenance Worker 3.00 Office Assistant 3.00 Permit Engineer 1.00 Public Works Inspector 1.00 Senior Engineer 4.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00 Public Works Subtotals 36.00 Redevelonment Administrative Secretary 1.00 Housing Redevelopment Manager 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 Redevelopment Subtotals 3.00 Building & Safety .................................16.00 City Clerk .............................................9.00 City Council ..........................................5.00 City Manager ........................................11.00 Community Services .............................25.00 Finance .................................................11.50 Planning ................................................11.00 Public Works ........................................36.00 Redevelopment .....................................3.00 Total Of Authorized Positions 127.50 $6,453 $2,309 $3,468 $4,016 $5,375 $2,264 $3,999 $3,411 $2,002 $1,607 $4,016 $2,876 $4,677 $3,734 $3,481 $2,309 $4,529 $3,734 Maximum $7,861 $2,879 $4,323 $5,011 $6,550 $2,827 $4,987 $4,157 $2,496 $2,006 $5,011 $3,585 $5,698 $4,658 $4,342 $2,879 $5,519 $4,658 Exempt/ Nonexempt E NE NE E E NE E E NE NE E NE E E NE E E Page 4 of 4 Proposed Annual Operating Budget Fiscal Year 1999-2000 CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 1989 CITY COUNCIL Steven J. Ford, Mayor Jeffrey E. Slone, Mayor Pro Tempore Jeff Comerchero, Councilmember Karel F. Lindemans, Councilmember Ronald H. Robens, Councilmember ACTING CITY MANAGER Slmxvn D. Nelson PREPARED BY: Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance July 1, 1999 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) ii City of Temecula TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page Budget Message .....................................................................................................................................................1 Resolution Adopting the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget .............................................................................9 City Seal and Mission Statement ..................................................................................................................L ........11 Value Statement .......................: ...........................................................................................................................12 Government Finance Officers Association Award .................................................................................................13 California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Award ................ : .....................................................................14 Directory ........................................................................................................................................................; .....15 City Organizational Chart .....................................................................................................................................16 Budget Process .....................................................................................................................................................17 Understanding the Budget Document ....................................................................................................................19 Description of Funds ......................................................' ......................................................................................20 Summary of Accounting Principles .......................................................................................................................22 Explanation of Major Revenue Sources ................................................................................................................23 Debt Administration .............................................................................................................................................26 Gann Appropriations Limit ...................................................................................................................................27 Community Profile ...................................................................................................................................~ ...........28 Locator Map ........................................................................................................................................................29 Budget Summaries Budget Summaries Overview ...............................................................................................................................31 Changes in Fund Balance by Fund 1999-00 ................ ..........................................................................................32 General Fund Revenues ........................................................................................................................................36 General Fund Revenues by Source ........................................................................................................................37 Gas Tax Fund Revenues by Source .......................................................................................................................38 Revenues by Fund - Community Services District ................................................................................................39 Revenues by Fund - Redevelopment Agency ........................................................................................................40 Expenditures by Department - General Fund ........................................................................................................42 Expenditure Summary by Category - General Fund ............................................................: .................................43 EXpenditure Summary by Category - Community Scrviccs District Funds ............ ; ..............................................'. 44 · Expenditure Summary by Category - Internal Service Funds ............ . ...................................................................45 Expenditure Summary by Category, Redevelopment Agency Funds ..... '. ..............................................................46 Expenditure Summary by Department - Gcneral Fund ........................................................~ ...........~ ....~ ................48 Expenditure Summary by Fund - Conununity Services District ..... ~ ......................................................................52 Expenditure Stunmary by Depamnent - Internal Service Funds ............................................................................54 Expenditure Summary by Depamnent - Redevelopment Agency .......................................................................... 55 Authorized Positions by Department .....................................................................................................................56 Personnel Allocation by Department .....................................................................................................................57 General Fund General Fund Overview ........................................................................................................................................63 City Council ............. ........................................................................................................... 64 City Manager .......................................................................................................................................................69 City Attorney .......................................................................................................................................................80 City Clerk ............. Finance ................................................................................................................................................................ Community Development .....................................................................................................................................88 94 Public Works ...................................................................................................................................................... 107 Police ..................................................................................................................................................................116 Fire .....................................................................................................................................................................121 Animal Control ...................................................................................................................................................125 Non-Departmental ............................................................................................ ....................................................127 ili City of Temecula TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Community Services District Community Services ...........................................................................................................................................129 Internal Service Funds Insurance ............................................................................................................................................................141 Vehicles ...............................................................................................................................................; ..............142 Information Systems ...........................................................................................................................................143' Support Services ....................................................................................................................................'. ............144 Facilities .............................................................................................................................................................145 Redevelopment Aaencv Redevelopment Agency .......................................................................................................................................147 Community Development Block Grant Community Development Block Grant ................................................................................................................153 Capital ImprOvement Prom'am Summan' Capital Improvement Program Summary ............................. ................................................................................155 Description of CIP Revenue Sources ...................................................................................................................157 Appendix Glossary of Terms ...............................................................................................................................................159 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property From Incorporation .................................................... 162 Federal Grant Expenditures .................................................................................................................................163 Construction, Bank Deposits, and Property Value From Incorporation ....................................... 2 .........................164 'Properly Tax Rates -Direct and Overlapping Governmenls From Incorporation .............................. .: ..................165 Principal Secured. Property Owners for the Year Ended June 30, 1998 .............................................. · ....................166 Legal Debt Margin ..............................................................................................................................................167 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt as of June 30, 1998 ........................................................... 168 Largest Employers by Number of Empoyees as of June 30, 1998 .........................................................................169 iv City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · MailingAddr~s: P.O. Box 9033 · Ternecula, CA 92589-9033 (909) 694-6444 · Fax (909] 694-1999 June 22, 1999 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: I am pleased to submit the proposed Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1999-00. This fiscal plan was developed to serve not only as a monetary statement of programs and policies, but as a document that reflects the many goals, progrmns, and service priorities that the City of Temecula is committed to providing its citizens. The Fiscal Year 1999-00 Operating Budget has been developed after a considerable review process. Departmental budget submittals were prepared and reviewed by line item in connection with projected revenues and detailed performance objectives. The result is this document: a conservative, balanced budget that provides for quality services while effectively utilizing available resources. CITY OF TEMECULA PROFILE The City of Tcmecula is a dynamic community comprised of 48,828 citizens of various cultural backgrounds spread across 26 square miles of gently rolling hills. The City maintains approximately 141 miles of the 226 miles of streets within its borders. The City has created 20 parks on 173 developed acres throughout the community which provide recreation opponanities for both the citizens of Temecula, as well as surrounding communities. Contracted services provided through Riverside County include police and fire protection. The Temecula Valley Unified School District provides 16 schools for 15,722 students at the kindergarten through 12th grade levels within the City. The City of Temecula prides itself on its community focus and quality of life. As the. Southem California economy continues its expansion phase, Temecula is at a key juncture in its history. The City 'enjoys some of the strongest economic and demographic ,indicators in the Inland Empire. Its job creation, local payroll. taxable trade, home sales and values, .income, school performance, and crime rates are all very positive. Residential construction and population growth are continuing io accelerate. A major regional mall (the Promenade Mall) is now under construction. The community enjoys a reputation as a family-oriented, beautiful place to live. REVENUES AND ECONOMIC CONDITION Fiscal year 1999-00 General Fund revenues are projected to reach $26,521,800, an increase of $3,086,500 or 13.2% from fiscal year 1998-99, and reflect the continued growth of the local economy. In the past year, the City has experienced significant interest in relocalion and expansion of existing businesses. The City has continued to work with the Chamber of Commerce and the Temecula Valley Economic Development Coq~oration in its effort to encourage the expansion or relocation of industries that generate local sales tax and employment advantages. The City has also worked with these organizations to develop and market Temecula as a tourist destination. Temecula's emergence as a center of job growth is prianarily the result of the migration of firms and people to the Inland Empire from the coastal counties of Southern California. This migration is occurring as the density of land development in Orange. Los Angeles and San Diego counties has created a shortage of manufacturing distribution and housing space, and increased space costs. I~Pnnted on Recyded Paper I June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City. Council In most cases, this phenomena is increasing the demand for business space and homes along transportation corridors in cities directly adjacent to Orange and Los Angeles counties. Temecula is unique in two ways. It has been able to attract finns and families to leap frog across miles of undeveloped land to locate within its borders. And, the jobs coming to the City are better paying than the Inland Empire average. Since the City's inception, local leaders have undertaken a consistent and successrid program to lure high technology finns to the area. These efforts have been aided by the City's physical beauty and moderate climate. Meanwhile, the 1-15 freeway has given commuters and - finns located in Temecula ready access to San Diego and Orange County markets, while allowing them to avoid the land restrictions and high costs of those areas. The following graphic details the major components of the City's General Fund revenues: FY 1999-00 Projected General Fund Revenues (Value in $ Million) Licenses & Services ($3.78) Transient Occupancy Tax ($1.04) "~ ~ Sales Tax ($12.49)j''~''' ' Operating Transfer In ($0.88) :,' i~ ~' /-Intergovernmental ($2.34) : -~. Investment Interest ($0.92) ~-,..~:. ;. · ........... · ': .. ~-Other ($0.62) ~-Property Tax ($1.30) _j/_~I lilt ~--Franchise Fees ($1.31) Total FY 1999-00 Projected General Fund Revenues $26,521,800 Changes in Revenues: General Fund Sales and Use Tax: Sales and Use Tax revenue is projected to increase from an estimate of $10,400,000 in FY 1998-99 to $12,487,000 in FY 1999-00. This increase is primarily a result of new retail development related to the Promenade Mall expected to open in late October 1999. Also contributing to this revenue growth are continued increases in the automobile and industrial segments of the City's tax base. The City continues to maintain a strong and diverse sales tax base by promoting economic development in areas such as manufacturing, light industrial, and retail businesses. Sales tax is the City's largest revenue source representing 47% of the total General Fund revenue. Temecula continues to exceed the state. county, and surrounding areas with respect to sales per capita. June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The following chart compares City sales per capita to the State of California and Riverside County. The prior 12 quarters historical trend is presented. Quarterly Sales Per Capita S4,200 · S3.500 S~800 & i · · i A · · · · · '~ $1,400 $700 I--,-ci~y o~,,,,~a, --iS--Stale of California +Rive'side County I Franchise Fees: Franchise Fee revenue is anticipated to increase from $ l, 175,000 to $1,311,500 due to population growth and commercial development. Property Tax: The FY 1999-00 revenue estimate for properly taxes is based on an assumed 2% increase in assessed valuation. Future additional assessed valuation increases will be partially offset by the impact of pending assessed valuation appeals by property owners. The FY 1999-00 estimate of $1,300,600 represents.approximately 5% of the total General Fund revenues. Motor Vehicle in Lieu: It is projected that this state subvention will increase by $175,300 to a total of $2,076,000 in FY 1999-00. Motor Vehicle in Lieu fees are distributed by the state on a per capita basis. Investment Interest: Investment interest is anticipated to decrease from $1,100,000 to $925,000 due to the planned significant expenditure of General Fund reserves for capital improvement projects in FY 1999-00. Licenses, Permits, and Charges for Services: An overall decrease from $4,099,01}0 to $3,776,500 is projected in FY 1999-00. This decrease is due to a possible reduction in building inspection and plan check fees.. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): The City collects an 8% tax on the amount of all transient (30 days or less) lodging rentals. TOT revenue is projected to be $1,036,000 in FY 1999-00, a 5% increase from the prior year. Chan~es in Revenues: Other Funds Gas Tax: A 6% increase in Gas Tax revenue is projected (to $876,600 in FY 1999-00), based on anticipated population gro~vth. This revenue is used for the maintenance, rehabilitation and improvement of public streets. Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax: This special tax is assessed to all real property owners and is used for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the City's park and recreation facilities, recreational and community service · programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights, and traffic signals. A 1% increase is projected (to $2,592,190) for FY 1999-00. June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Community Services District Assessments: These assessments represent parcel charges to real property owners for various service levels such as residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection, and road maintenance. The projected amount of these assessments for FY 1999-00 is $3,203,810, a 4% increase from the prior year. EXPENDITURES Total General Fund expenditures (excluding operating transfers out) are proposed to be $24,776,410 i'n FY 1999-00, an increase of $2,888,870 or 13.2% from FY 1998-99. This proposed expenditure level results in a margin of projected revenues oyer proposed expenditures in the General Fund of $1,745,390. In addition, operating transfers out are proposed to set aside reserves for use in funding capital improvement projects ($725,000), and for replacing computer workstations ($233,000). Public safety continues to represent the largest single portion of the General Fund operating budget at 37%. Proposed expenditures for police and fire services total $9,128,240 (net of a $1.67 million fire tax credi0. Proposed public safety expenditure increases total $1,275,876 for FY 1999-00 and include the addition of four sworn police officers (in response to population growth and the impacts of the regional mall), and the addition of six pammedics to staff a two-person paramedic unit. Substantial expenditure increases are proposed for the area of public works. Proposed public works expenditures for FY 1999-00 total $4,508,160, an increase of $756,571 from the prior fiscal year. This increase is a result of the City's aggressive capital improvement program, and focus on improving traffic flow in the City. The fol Iowing graphic includes a breakdown of general fund operating expenditures by function: FY 1999-00 General Fund Budget by Function Econ Dev/Comm Support 5% Public Safety 37% ...::., :.~?~... . . /' Public Works 18% CFD 88-12 Reimbursement 4% _/ Administration , ': ~..""~' 5% ~ ~'~_Comm Development 18% FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The City Council developed a Mission Statement in 1991 which created a long-term vision for development of City policy. The Mission Statement is found on page 11 and addresses cosnmunity safety, housing, jobs, financial stability, and quality of life issues. Using this Statement as a foundation, in November 1993 the Council adopted the City's first General Plan, which sets forth a long-term comprehensive plan for the physical development of the City through the Plan's Vision Statement. The elements in the General Plan are land use, circulation, housing, open space and conservation, growth management, public safety, noise, air quality, design and economic development. Based on the goals and policies identified in the plan, staff prepared objectives and performance measures to begin implementing the plan. June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of tile City Council During FY 1995-96, the City began a strategic planning process to expand the City's vision beyond the scope of the elements listed above. Team building workshops were held with all City staff which resulted in the development of a value statement by the employees of the City. This value statement, found on page 12, is used as 1) a tool in the employee hiring/selection process, 2) a guide in conducting City business, and 3) a statement to the citizens affirming what the City, as an organization, stands for and the level of service they can expect firore the City. A goal and priority setting workshop was held with the City Counci.l in November, 1998. The primary area 0f focus was in addressing deficiencies in the City's traffic circulation system. Other items of discussion included a review of City reserve policies, and economic developmcnlIredcvelopment strategies. Depamnental goals and objectives are updated annually and are included in the Operating Budget section of this document. Goals and objectives are listed by program within each department. The following is a partial listing of the FY 1999-00 performance objectives as they relate to key elements of the City's Mission Slatement and Vision Statement. Maintain fiscal stability: · Mainlain a 30% reserve for economic uncertainty · Emphasize safety and liquidity over yield when investing City funds. Maintain a safe/secure environment: Respond to calls for police services in a timely manner. Perform public safety education programs, mainlain neighborhood watches, and conduct timely traffic investigations. The FY 1999-00 budget includes the addition of t~vo patrol officers, a traffic officer, and a special enforcement (narcotics) officer. Respond to all fire emergency calls within five (5) minutes. Conduct a comprehensive fire education program. Continue to improve emergency services through file funding of a paramedic squad to supplement existing emergency medical services. Provide quality jobs and promote commerce: · Encourage the growth and expansion of existing industries by providing' high quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance. · Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality goods and services for residents, workers, and tourists. · Use redevelopment powers and opportunities to enhance development opportunities. Target high quality busin. esses from the following industry categories: small to mid-sized businesses, high-tech manufacturing and communication services, paper and plastics, health-related manufacturing services, and vineyards/vintners. · Utilize the award-winning "Temecula Fast Track Process" to provide one-stop streamlined development permitting. · Develop and maintain an effective marketing program to publicize the virtues of Temecula. · Develop Temecula as a comprehensive, recognizable tourist destination with a range of attractions. Encourage programs for all ages: Increase the number of family oriented progr,/m opporluniticS at the Temecula Community Center. Determine the feasibility of providing City-sponsored recreation opportunities at the Promenade Mall site, such as a story time for kids, musical presentations, and art exhibits. 5 June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Provide adequate infrastructure concurrent with development: · Update the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Design and construct capital projects within funding and time requirements specified in the CIP. · Allocate $28.1 million in FY 1999-00 for Citywide circulation 'projects to improve traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion on the City's major freeway overpasses and near the Promenade Mall. Utilize human resources effectively: · Meet with City Council in a strategic planning forum. · Conduct an annual retreat for department directors to establish service level and program goals. · Provide in-house training opportunities for all employees to enhance productivity and performance. · Administer an employee recognition program including quarterly Temecula Pride/Good Deed Award luncheons. Enhance and revitalize historic area: · Work with Old Toxvn merchants, property owners, civic groups, and the development commumty to: 1) Make private and public improvements in Old Town 2) Develop projects that will revitalize the Old Town economy 3) Assist in the private rehabilitation of buildings in Old Town · Promote and encourage participation in the FaCade hnprovement Program. PERFORMANCE MEASURES The budget document has been formatted to detail file operational goals, objectives, and performance measurements of each depamnenL Finance Depamnent staff has worked with all departments to identify significant accomplishments, as well as to develop qualilalive and quantitative performance measures. The goal of the organization is to establish a comprehensive reporting system which will give the public, City Council, and City staff the ability to evaluale the level and value of service provided to the community. IMPACT OF LEGISLATION ON THE BUDGET Currently, the State of California is projecting a $4.3 billion budget surplus for FY 1998-99. There are several proposals on file table in file State budget negotiations that may provide some benefit to the City. The various proposals include the following: The State Senate version of the budget contains a cap on the "ERAF" shill of properly tax revenues from local governments to school districts that was inilialed in the early 1990's, so that the growth of property taxes would go to local governments. This proposal would amount to an increase in property tax revenues to local governments of approximately $234 million in the first year. TIle State Assembly version of the budget does not include any "ERAF' relief, but instead includes a $200 million one-time paymenl to local govermnenls, requiring file revenue to be spent on libraries, streets, and parks. Although currently not a pan of any version of the budget, the State Senate Republicans have a proposal to repeal file ability of counties to clmrge booking fees to cities for the cost of booking prisoners into the county jail system, with the Slate reimbur-~ing counties for any lost revenue. A repeal of the booking fee would save the City approximately $140,000 annually. June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council While there is some reason for optimism, there arc also several issues that may have a negative future impact on the City's budget. One such issue is the effort to accelerate reductions in the vehicle license fees paid on all vehicles registered in the State. The majority of this State revenue is apportioned to local governments (the City is projecting to receive $2,076,000 in FY 1999-00). The State is currently committed to using State General Fund revenues to replace any revenues that may be lost by local governments as a result of reductions in the vehicle license fee. While the State may currently be in a position to fulfill this commitment, the State's ability and willingness to do so indefinitely is questionable. STAFFING POLICY The proposed FY 1999-00 Operating Budget is a well-planned budget that increases the City's current levels of' service to the community. City staffing levels are continuously reviewed to identify over/understaffing so that appropriate changes can be made either during the annual budget process or during the mid-year review. The total City staffing for bY' 1999-00 will include 127.5 regular full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, an increase of 10 positions from the prior year. ACCOUNTING, AUDITING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING POLICY The City of Temecula receives an independent audit annually and maintains a solid internal audit capacity. The City prepares all annual financial reports in strict compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP), as outlined by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The City maintains a strong system of internal controls. which has resulted in an unqualified audit opinion for the past several years. RESERVE POLICY The City Council previously identified an objective of developing and maintaining a reserve of 30% of the General Fund budget for economic uncerlalnties and contingencies, which will amount to $7,432,923 of the projected $12,965,999 total General Fund balance at June 30, 2000. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT POLICY The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) was established to provide a comprehensive, balanced neighborhood and community park system in Temecula by constantly reviewing growth,' demographics, and available facilities. The TCSD also provides tree management, refuse hauling, and a recycling 'program for the community. Oversight responsibility rests with the City Council, who serves as 'TCSD's Board of Directors.' All services are funded primarily by fees and a special tax charged on the assessor's. parcel roll. The proposed budget for TCSD totals $7,957,230. The budget includes additional operating and maintenance costs for the Temecula Valley Museum and 29.5 acres of new parks that have been recently dedicated. At the council's direction, the City will make a $1,176,000 contribution to the TCSD budget in FY 1999-00. This contribution represents an increase of $325,980 from the prior fiscal year. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY POLICY On April 7, 1991, the City Council adopted ordinances which adopted the Redcvelopmcnt Plan for Temecula. This action established the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA), which assumed responsibility for the plan effective July 1, 1991. The RDA is responsible for enhancing the existing character and economic foundation of the project area by removing blight and promoting economic revitalization. It is also designed to provide quality housing opportunities for low to moderate income citizens. The RDA is funded primarily by property tax increment revenue. The total gross tax increment revenue for FY 1999-00 is projected to be $5,795,000. This amount includes funds to be used for low and moderate income housing purposes, administrative costs, debt service, and redevelopment projects. June 22, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY The City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is presented to the City Council under separate cover. This program provides a multi-year plan for capilal improvements which is updated annually to ensure compliance with the program. The impact of capital projects on maintenance and operating costs were taken into consideration in the development of the operating budget. Circulation, infrastructure, parks, redevelopment, and other various projects are identified in the CIP budget with estimated project costs totaling $267,876,560 over the next five years. In accordance with City Council direction and community needs, emphasis has been placed on traffic/circulation projects in FY 1999-00. The CIP reflects an aggressive $28,143,560 in traffic/circulation project costs, and $47,377,460 in total project costs to be incurred in FY 1999-00. CASH MANAGEMENT/INVESTMENT POLICY In accordance with Government Code Sections 53601 through 53659, the City of Temecula annually adopts an investment policy identifying the rules and' procedures that apply to investment instruments that may be used in investing idle cash. Temecula's investment policy is reviewed and updated annually, and adopted by the City Council in July each year. The policy follows the objectives of maintaining safety, liquidity, and yield (in that-order of priority). It is imporlant to note that the City does not invest in high risk investments such as derivatives and reverse purchase agreements. All investments are made in compliance with the Government Code and the City of Temecula Investment Policy. DEBT POLICY The City of Temecula is in the process of developing and adopted specific debt policies. The proposed document includes policies for determining the City's approach to land secured and conduit financing. It is the City's intent to support projects which address a public need and provide a public benefit. These policies are also designed to comply with Section 53312.7(a) of the Government Code. The City has not issued any general obligation debl. CONCLUSION The FY 1999-00 Operating Budget is balanced and provides for increased services in the areas of public safety, public works, and parks and recreation. The budget was constructed by utilizing a conservative approach in projecting revenues and corresponding expenditures. This conservative approach is necessary, as the City must continue m be sensitive to potential changes in the condition of the State and local economy. ff the final State Budget results in any adverse impacts to the City, or if local conditions change that negatively impact the projected revenue stream, this budget will allow for staff will return to the Council with recommendations to make th~ appropriate adjustments. I would like to thank the City Council, all the Department Directors, and their staffs for all of the assistance and support that was provided during this year's budget process. I would like to give special thanks to Genie Roberts, Director of Finance, Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director, and the Finance Department staff for their long hours and dedication to the City and fl~is budget process. Slhawn Nelson Acting City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY 1999- 00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted. Section 2. appropriations: That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager. C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part-time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E.' The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000, Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 1999, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1999-00. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22~ day of June, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22"d day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 10 1989 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the City of Temecula is to maintain a safe, secure, clean, healthy, and orderly community; to balance the utilization of open space, parks, trail facilities~ quality jobs, public .transportation, diverse housing, and adequate. infrastructure~ and to enhance and revitalize1 historic areas. The City will encourage programs for all age groups, utilize its human resources, and preserve its natural resources while stimulating technology, promoting commerce, and utilizing sound fiscal policy. It is the City Council's resolve that this mission will instill a sense of pride and accomplishment in its citizens and that the City will be known as a progressive, innovative, balanced and environmentally sensitive community. 11 CITY O F TEME CULA VALUE STATEMENT As employees of the City of Temecula, in striving to be unique in our local government, we value the following: E EAMWORK among all employees. NHANCEMENT of the work environment through open lines of communication. V -C UTUAL respect of others. DUCATION of employees and citizens about the operations and accomplishments of the City. USTOMER service is our most important product. UNLIMITED potential for continued personal growth and organizational development. A EADERSHIP in local government. SSUMING 100% responsibility for projects and assignments. 12 City of Temecula GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION A WARD The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the City of Temocula for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. NMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCi Distinguished Budget Presentation PRESENTED TO City of Temecula, California For the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, President Executive Director 13 CiO~ of Temecula CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS A WARD Co, li:ornia Sod~t,g o- Certificate of Award Excellence in Operational Budgeting 1998-99 Presented to City of Temecula recognizes the achievement of Excellence in Operational Budgeting and reflects an ouutanding budget document and the underlying budgeting process through which the budget is implemented. March 1, 1999 Dedicated to Excellence in Municipal Financial Management 14 Ci,tv of Temecula DIRECTORY EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT Acting City Manager Assistant City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant to the City Manager City Attorney City Clerk/Director of Support Services Director of Finance Chief Building Official Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer Director of Community Services Planning Manager Housing/Redevelopment Manager Chief of Police Fire Chief Shawn D. Nelson James O'Grady Gary Thornhill Grant Yates Peter M. Thorson · Susan W. Jones Genie Roberts Tony Elmo Bill Hughes Herman D. Parker Debbie Ubnoske John Meyer Pete Labahn Mike Brown FINANCE DEPARTMENT Director of Finance Assistant Finance Director Senior Management Analyst Senior Accountant Accountant Administrative Secretary Accounting Specialist Accounting Specialist Accounting Specialist Purchasing Specialist Accounting Assistant Accounting Assistant (Project) · Genie Roberts Tim McDermott Gus Papagolos Bill Pattison Vacant Linda Norton Reta Weston Barbara Smith Jada Yonker Mary Vollmuth Zenaida Smith Cassandra MananSingh 15 City of Temecula CITY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART COIVH~SSIONS crllz~s oF TEMECtLA I CITY COUNCIL ~ D. Nelson ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER JimO'Gtady , I , , PuNic Wodcs Cormtory RedeveloptrerlCity Clede Bill HtChes Developmerl Sul~pott ices (Acting) C~yThornlill Jo~Meyer SusanW. Jo~s I ADMINISTRATION Ge~e Robets I City A1TORNEY PeterM. TIn~ I Mice Pete Lsl~ahn I PUBLIC SAFETY F~ lleBn~wn 16 City of Temecula BUDGE PROCESS The development of the operating budget began in November 1998 when a goal and priority setting workshop was held with the City Council. The primary area of focus was how to address deficiencies in the City's traffic circulation system. Other items of discussion included a review of City reserve policies, and economic development/redevelopment strategies. In February 1999 the first budget workshop was held with the City. Manager and all department directors. This workshop included a briefing on the status of the current fiscal y. ear budget, a review of the FY 1999-00 budget process calendar, and a discussion on essential principles and elements of the budget process. Staff was provided with a practical application to assist in the development .of the departmental budget requests, which included the following: Review and evaluate current goals (and performance measurements) Identify new goals and programs Identify the impacts of new programs. on existing resources. Examine organizational efficiency, and reallocate existing resources to address these impacts Identify additional resource requirements (if existing resources will be exhausted) In March a second budget workshop ~vas held with the City Manager, all department directors, and other key City staff me~nbers responsible for budget development. The operating budget preparation guidelines were distributed at this time. The guidelines served to outline the policies and procedures to be used in preparing the FY 1999-00 budgel. Clearly defined budget requirements and time sensitive budget document objectives were discussed, ensuring complete and accurate understanding by all. The milestones outlined in the guidelines reflected the involvement of the City Manager and City staff in reviewing and discussing policies and service guidelines, along with the concurrent development of financial projections, objectives, and requirements at the staff level. With this approach, the policies, service guidelines, and priorities which guide expenditure considerations were incorporated into the proposed budget prior to formal submission to the City Council. Individual meetings were later held by key Finance Department staff with each department to assist in the budget development process. Assistance was provided to each department in reviewing historical expenditure information, personnel costs, and in refining departmental goals, objectives, and performance measures. For the purposes of budget preparation and fonnuialion, departmental budget submittals consisted of detail by expenditure line item. Specific justification was required for the following: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Significant expenditure clmnges Personnel costs, including all temporary and project personnel costs, as well as. any proposed staffing increases Contracted services and supplies (both new and recurring) Purchases of new equipment Outlays for improvements and facility 'repairs All special project expenses and one-time expenses Travel, conference, and education expenses Dues, memberships, and publications Review and analysis was then conducted of each department's request. The review of the budget requests included comparative analysis of historical and current expenditure levels. The information was compiled for review by the City Manager. Key City Manager and Finance Department staff then held meetings with each department director to discuss the budget request and obtain additional information to assist in the assessment of the requests. The evaluation and final recommendation involved assigning relative priorities to the departmental requests and then comparing the associated costs to available funding resources. Following this review, department directors adjusted line item requests in accordance with the City Manager's direction. Finally, meetings were held individually with each council member to review the components of the proposed budget, prior to formal consideration for adoption. The Temecula Municipal Code requires that the City Manager submit the proposed annual budget and salary plan to the City Council for approval. The Municipal Cede also requires that the Director of Finance compile the budget revenue and expenditure estimales for the City Manager. 17 City of Temecula BUDGET PROCESS (Continued) The City Council approves the annual budget submitted by the City Manager prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year. All appropriations lapse at year end except for those relating to encumbrances which are appmved for carryover to the subsequent year. The City Council has the legal authority to amend the budget at any time during the fiscal year. The City Manager has the authority to make adjustments within departmental budgets. Adjustments between depa~ments require the approval of the City Council. Budgetary controls are maintained to ensure compliance with the budget as approved by the City Council. The level of bUdgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amoun0 is at the department level. Department directors and other management staff with budgetary responsibililjes are provided with bi-wcekly' budget versus actual expenditure reports. Quarterly financial statements are prepared for the City COuncil which include a budget-to-actual analysis for both revenues and expenditures. Revenue projections are revised as part of the mid:year budget analysis, and appropriations are adjusted, if required. The following chart illustrates the budget phases which span the fiscal year. Policy/Strategy Development Plhase Departmental Budget Development Budget Phase Guidelines Review Phase Adoption Phase COUNCIL WORKSHOP Program Objectives I Finance/ Executive Review I $ · Council Briefings OPERATING BUDGET I Financial Projections hnplementation Phase Bi-Weekly Budget Reports Quarterly Financial Statements I Mid-Year Analysis & Revision 18 City of Temecula UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET DOCUMENT This budget document provides the public with concise and readable information about City government and displays the City's objectives and budget for the 1999.00 fiscal year. The budget document begins with the City Manager's transmittal letter, which provides an overview of the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Operating Budget by highlighting programs and major projects. The budget document is then divided into the following sections: · Introduction · . Budget Summaries · Operating Budget: · General Fund · Community Services District · Internal Service Funds · Redevelopment Agency · Community Development Block Grant · Capital Improvement Program Sununary · Appendix The Budget Summaries section provides revenue and expenditure analysis. This section presents historical and categorical data for comparative purposes. Staffing levels are also summarized. The Operating Budgets section contains the program description, key objectives, performance measures, and resource allocation plans for each operating program. Budget information is organized by department and identifies the major services provided by the City. Finally, the Appendix includes: · · · · · · · · · · · Glossary of Terms Assessed and Estimated Actthai Value of Taxable Property (Values in Thousands) from Incorporation Federal Grant Expenditures Construction, Bank Deposits, and Properly Value (Values in Thousands) from Incorporation -Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments from Incorporation Principal Secured Properly OWners - June 30, 1998 Legal Debt Margin Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt - june 30, 1998 Largest Employers by Number of Employecs- June 30, 1998 Index Additional information on the City's fiscal affairs is available in the following documents at the City offices: · City Treasurer's Monthly Reports · Quarterly Financial Statements · Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 19 Ci.tv of Temecula DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS The City of Temecula revenues and expenditures are accounted for in a series of funds. Each fund is an autonomous accounting entity, established in accordance with legal and professional accounting standards. Funds are used to segregate the various financial activities of a governmental entity and to demonstrate compliance with specific regulations, restrictions or limitations, (i.e., demonstrating that restricted revenues are spent only for allowed purposes). Funds used in government are classified into three broad categories: governmental, proprietary and fiduciary. Governmental funds include activities usually associated with a typical state or local government's operations (public safety, general government activities, etc.). Proprietary funds are used in government to account for activities often found in the private sector (utilities, sladiums and golf courses are prime examples). Fiduciary funds* are utilized in situations where the government is acting in a ~ducimy capacity as a trustee or agent. The funds utilized by the City of Temecula, governmental and proprietary, are detailed below. General Fund This is the general operating fund for the City, utilized to account for all resources not required to be accounted for in another fund. Soecial Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are used to account for specific resources that are legally restricted to expenditure for particular purposes. Gas Tax Fund The City maintains the fund to account for the Highway User's Tax revenues received from the Stale of California under Sections 2105, 2 107 and 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways Code. Community Services District Benefit assessments are charged to property owners within the District (City) to provide recreation, park development, street lighting slope maintenance, refuse collection, and e~nergency road construction and maintenance. Specific services provided are identified as follows: · :. Parks and Recreation - Parks and recreation facility operations and maintenance, community recreation programs · :' Service Level "A" - Arterial street lighting traffic signals, and median maintenance · :. Service Level "B" - Residential street lighting · :. Service Level "C" - Perimeter landscaping and .slope maintenance · :. Service Level "D" - Refuse collection, recycling, and street sweeping · :. Service Level '~R" - Street and road ~naintenance Redevelopment AEency This fund is used to account for the twenty percent (20%) of property tax increment that must be reserved for use in low and moderate income housing programs. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) This fund is used to account for grants received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development C'HUD") through the Riverside County Economic Development Corporation. The grants are used for the development of a viable community by providing decent housing a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. 20 City of Temecula DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS (Continued) Debt Service Funds Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of all general long- term debt obligations of the City and related entities. Redevelopment Agency This fund is used to account for tie payment of interest and principal on outstanding tax increment bonds and otter debt of tie Redevelopment Agency paid from tax increment revenue. Community Services District This fund is used to account for tie payment of interest and principal on outstanding certificates of participation issued to finance tie construction of a community recreation center. Caoital Proiects Funds Capital Projects Funds are used to 'account for financial resources used for tie acquisition and improvement of major capital facilities. PROPRIETARY FUNDS Internal Service Funds Internal Service Fund are used to account for tie financing of goods or services by one department to otter deparanents of the City on a cost reimbursement basis. Insurance This Internal Service Fund was established to fund and account for tie City's liability and properly insurance costs. Vehicles This Internal Service Fund was created to depreciate vehicles over tieir estimated useful lives, and to accu~nulate resources for the purchase of future replacement vehicles. Information Systems This Internal Service Fund was developed to fund and account for computer and telephone system operating and maintenance expenses, depreciation of all related computer 'and telephone equipment over tieir estimated useful lives, and to accumulate resources for future equipment purchases. Support Services This' internal Service Fund was established as a cost center for the~ City's central duplicating and mailing activities. Facilities This Internal Service Fund was established to account for tie cost of City Hall and City Maintenance Facility operations and maintenance. 21 City of Temecula SUA~tARY OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for, in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The various funds arc .grouped in the financial statements in this report into generic fund types and broad fund categories as follows: GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS PROPRIETARY FUNDS General Fund Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Funds Capital Projects Funds Internal Service Funds Insurance Vehicles Information Systems Support Services Facilities Accounting Basis All governmental funds are accounted for and budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. The primary revenue sources susceptible to accrual are properly and sales taxes, franchise fees, transient occupancy taxes, investment income, fines and forfeitures collected by County courts, gas lax subventions, and motor vehicle-in-lieu subventions. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. An exception to this general rule is principal and interest due on general long-term debt which is recognized when due. Internal Service Funds are accounted for and budgeted using the accruai basis of accounting, i.e., revenues are recognized in the period earned and expenses are recognized in the period incurred. Encumbra~.ce accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and Other commitments for the expenditure of funds are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed in the governmental fundS: Open encumbrances are recorded as reservation of fund balance since the commitments will be paid by subsequent years budget appropriations. Encumbrances do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. 22 City of Temecula EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES General Fund ~ A~:tud 1996-97 ........ Actual 1997-98 e$timntmd Proje~t~d i998-99 1999-00 BProperty Tax Pronertv Tax The valuation of property in the City is determined by the Riverside County Tax Assessor. The County levies a base tax at the rate of one percent (1%) of assessod valuation. Approximately 4.9 percent of the base one percent levy is allocated to the City. ;l'he 1999-00 revenue estimate for property tax reflects a 2.5 percent increase over the projected 1998-99 amount. This increase reflects that assessed valuation increases realized as a result of new development are being partially offset by the impact of pending property owner assessed valuation appeals. Franchise Fees The City imposes fees on refuse lmuling, gas, electric and cable television companies operating in the City. The fees range from one to eight percent (1-8%) of gross receipts. Overall, an 1'1.6 percent increase is projected in these fees in 1999-00 from die 1998-99 estimated a:nount. This increase is reflective of continued commercial and residential growth in the City. : .:u(' : :';k ,aa./~, : ;.O', '.,.",,'/""" wiJll.I)lp)~dram · 1~,(, ~,,h(,.d/' · ., ..,,~" .,a Actual 199~.97 A~ml i~timn~xl 1997-98 1998-99 · ItrenehiN Fee, Pro~ 1999-00 · .,/' I. '~'~;L ~., ,/",~ u, Actre] I ~)6-97 ii ............. Proj=c~d Sales and Use Taxes In accordance with the California Revenue and Taxation Cede, 'the State 'of California imposes a 7.75 percent sales and use tax on all taxable sales in the City. The City receives 1.0 percent of the taxable sales in the City, and 0.50 percent is authorized by "Measure A" which is levied within Riverside County for various transportation pmT. oses. Sales m.x is the City's largest revenue source representing Actual Eatlrnat=d ,~7-~s im-~ 47.1 percent of the total General Fund revenue. In late · S.le..ndU.tTu October 1999 the Promenade Mall and related "power center" is expected to open in the City, thus adding to the City's already strong retail base. As a result of sales tax generated by the mall, power center, and related retail development, plus continued growth in the industrial, autos, and transportation components of the local economy, the 1999-00 revenue projection for sales tax reflects a 20.1 percent increase from the 1998-99 estimate. 23 Ci(v of Temecula EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES (Continued) Prooertv Transfer Tax The Temecula Municipal Code authorizes the imposition of a transfer tax on real propony sold in the City. The tax rate is $0.275 for each $500 of purchase value. The amount projected for 1999-00 of $295,000 represents an increase of $20,000 from 1998-99. Transient Occuoancv Tax The Tcmccula Municipal Code authorizes the City-to levy a tax for the privilege of occupying lodgings on a transient basis. The tax is asse'ssed at a rate of eight percent (8%). The estimated Transient Occupancy Tax revenue for 1999-00 of $1,036,000 represents a 4.7 percent increase from 1998- 99. Licenses and Permits The California Government Code and State Constitution gives cities the authority to assess certain license and pennit fees as a means of recovering the cost of regulating various activities. Examples include building permits and business licenses. A clue I 1996-97 Actual EstimatedProjected 1997-98 1998-99 19994)0 ITramsJeut Occupant-/Tax Charees for Services Service charges or fees are imposed on the user for a specific service rendered based on the rationale that the benefitling party should bear the cost of the service rather than the general public. Fines and Forfeitures The California Vehicle and Penal Codes impose fines and penalties for traffic violations and vehicular parking. These revenues are collected by Riverside County through the County court system and a portion distributed to the City, less an adininistrative overhead cost. Effective July 1, 1993 the City assumed responsibility for the administmlion and collection of parking fines. Investment Interest The City pools its available cash from various funds and invests in instruments as allowed in file City's investment policy approved by the City Council. Earnings are allocated to various funds on the basis of proportionate cash balances. A 15.9% decrease in investment interest is anticipated in 1999-00 due to the planned use of reserves to fund capital improvement projects. Inter~overnmental The primary' revenue included in this category is the state allocated motor vehicle in-lieu tax. Section 11005 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code imposes an annual license fee equivalent to 2% of the market value of motor vehicles in-lieu of local property taxes.' The code.also specifies that 81.25 percent of the revenues are to be divided equally between cities and counties, and apportioned on the basis of population. The Projcc~J 1999-00 Actual Actual Estima~d J 996-97 1997-~ 1998-99 [] Motor Vr|jjele In I,ieu 1999-00 projected motor vehicle in-lieu revenue of $2,074,700 represents a 9.2 percent increase from the 1998-99 estimated amount duc to continued population growth in the City. It is anticipated that any further reduction in this revenue in 1999-00 as a result of State legislation will be backfilled by other State revenues (at least for 1999-00). Reimbursements This category of revenue includes the recovery of personnel costs that arc allocated to various capital improvement projects, and are thus reimbursed by various special revenue funding sources. Also included in this category are charges to the Temecula Community Services District and Temecula Redevelopment Agency for administrative overhead and other services provided by the City. 24 CRy of Temecula EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES (Continued) Other Funds Gas Tax Funds The State of California assesses a tax on gasoline purchases as authorized by Sections 2105, 2106, 2107 and 2107.5 of the California Streets and Highways Cede. A portion of this tax is allocated to the City based on a per capita formula established by law. These funds are earmarked for the maintenance, rehabilitation or improvement of public streets. Gas tax revenues are projected to increase to $876,600 in 1999-00, a 6.8 percent 'increase from the 1998-99 estimate.due to population growth in the City. Assessments The Temecula CommunitS' Services District levies a .charge on real property to provide street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection, and road maintenance. Parks/Liffhtinff Services S!~ecial Tax This special tax was approved by the voters of Temecula on March 4, 1997. Proceeds from the special tax are required to be used for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the City's public parks and recreation facilities, recreational and community service programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals. Tax Increment The Temecula Redevelopment Agency receives the penion of ad valorem property taxes resulting from increases in the assessed valuation within the redevelopment project area over the base year assessed valuation. As required by California Health and Safety Cede, 20 percent of the gross tax increment is set aside in a Low and Mederate Income Housing Fund to be used to increase, improve, or preserve the supply of low and reedcrate income housing. A two percent increase in tax increment revenue is projected due to anticipated increases in assessed valuation (which will partially be offset by the impact of pending property owner assessed valuation appeals). 25 Ci(y of Temecula DEBT ADMINISTRATION As of June 30, 1999, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency had $13,895,000 of Tax Allocation bonds outstanding. The bonds were issued to finance various public improvements within the Agency's redevelopment project area. The bonds bear interest from 5.25% to 5.5%, and are payable from property tax increment revenues generated within the project area. As of June 30, 1999, the Temecula Public Facilities Financing Corporation had $4,370,000 of Certificates of Participation outstanding. The Certificates of Participation were issued for the benefit of the Temecula Community Services District. Proceeds from the sale of the certificates were used to finance the construction of a community recreation center. The certificates bear interest at rates ranging from 3.4% to 7.125%, and are payable from the citywide rates and charges levied on real property located within the District. As of June 30, 1999, the City had no general obligation bonds outslanding. 71~e 1999-00 fiscal year debt service requirements for the above-mentioned obligations are as follows: Issue Interest Date Description Rates Principal Interest Total 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds 5.25 - 5.5% $ 690,000 $ 758,550 $ 1,448,550 1992 Certificates of Participation 3.4 - 7.125% 200.000 293.965 493.965 TOTAL $ 890,000 $ 1,052,515 $ 1,942,515 26 City of Temecula GANN APPROPRM TIONS LlltilT Article XIIIB of the Califomia State Constitution, more commonly referred to as the Gann Initiative or Gann Limit, was approved by California voters in November 1979 and placed limits on the mount of proceeds of taxes that state and local governmental agencies can receive and spend each year. The limit is different for each agency and the limit changes each year. Each year's limit is based on the amount of tax proceeds that were authorized to be spent in fiscal year 1978-79 in each agency, modified for changes in inflation and population in each subsequent year. For cities which incorporated after 1978-79, such as the City of Temecula, the initial appropriations limit was set by the voters at the time of incorporation. In accordance with the Government Code Section 56842.6 the City was required to recompute the Gann limit since incorporation based on actual tax revenues and place the new limit on the ballot at the first general election after incorporation which was November 10, 1992. Each year the City Council must adopt, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. Using cost of living data provided by the State of California, and population and per capita personal income data provided by the State Department of Finance, the City's Appropriations Limit for 1999-00 has been computed to be $28,878,773. Appropriations subject to the limitation in the 1999-00 budget total $19,675,664, which is $9,203,109 less than the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non-tax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources would be subject to the Appropriations Limit and could not exceed the $9,203,109 variance indicated. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $9,203,109 from budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limits, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years or voter approval of an increase in the City's Appropriations Limit. $30,000,000J $25,000,000 / $20,000,000'/ $15,000,000 / $10,000,000 ~ $5,000,0~.-~~~ 1996-9~ 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Appropriations Subject to Limit · Legal Limit ] 27 City of Temecula COMMUNITY PROFILE GENERAL CITY DATA Date Incorporated: Form of Government City Employment: Number of Authorized Positions Population ' ' Number of registered voters Median family income Area Streets City Maintained Streets Altitude: Rainfall: December 1~ !989 Council/Manager 127.5 ·. 48,828 22,000 $ 45,655 26 Square' Miles 226 Miles 141 Miles 1000-1200 Feet 19.52 inches per year Located: 55 miles N of San Diego; 85 miles SE of Los Angeles PUBLIC SAFETY DATA Fire Protection: (contract with Riverside County) Number of Stations· Number of Staff- Firefighters/Officers Number of Volunteer Firefighters 4 49 30 Police Protection: (contract with Riverside Count)') Number of Stations Number of Sworn Officers Supervision / Managemen1 2 42 u 9 EDUCATIONAL· DATA Education: Tcmccula Unified School District NumBer of Schools 16 ' Number of:Teachers Number of Studeros 15,722 Libraries: (conWact with Riverside Count)') 1 RECREATIONAL / TOURIST DATA Recreation and Culture: Parks Number of Acres ( 173 acres developed) 20 312 Hotcl/Motcls: Number of Lodging Propertics 10 Total Number of Roo:ns 719 28 City of Temecula L 0C,4 TOR M,4 P Catann Idmd 10 pd., o,-- Loc~r M,p of TEMF.,CUX~ REGION andSouthemCnlifornia 29 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) 3O City of Temecula BUDGET SUMiVIARIES 0 VER VIE IV The Budget Summaries Section includes a breakdown of revenues and expenditures by funds including General Fund specifics and City totals. The graphs and summaries presented include the following: Changes in Fund Balance by Fund 1999-00 General Fund Revenues General Fund Revenues by Source Gas Tax Ftmd Revenues by Source Revenues by Fund - Conunity Services District , Revenues by Fund - Redev'elopment Agency Expenditures by Department - General Fund Expenditure Summary by Category - General Fund Expenditure Summary by Category - Community Services District Funds Expenditure Summary by Category - Internal Service Funds Expenditure Summary by Category - Redevelopment Agency Funds Expenditure Summary by Department - General Fund (Four Year Comparison) Expenditure Summary by Fund - Community Services District (Four Year Comparison) Expenditure Sumlnary by Fund - Internal Service Funds (Four .Year Comparison) Expenditure Summary by Fund - Redevelopment Agency (Four Year Comparison) Authorized Positions by Department Summary of Authorized Positions Personnel Allocation by Department 31 City of Tenwcula CHANGES IN FUND BitLANCE BY FUND 1~9~-00 Special Revenue Fund General Gas Low/Moderate Fund Tax Housing Revenues $ 25,640,700 Other Sources: Operating Transfers In 881,100 Long-term Debt $ 881,100 $ 1,269,000 Rodevelopment Alency Redevelop. $ 113,100 $ 1,105,400 Tolal Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) (1) Other Uses: Operating Transfers Out (2) Exces. s of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Undcr) Exlymdituras and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July !, 1999 (3) Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 Debt 8errlee 4,806,000 972,570 26,521,800 881,100 1,269,000 1,218,500 5,778,570 (24,776,410) (845,990) (1,019,580) (5, 111,820) (958,000) (881,100) (1,105,400) 787,390 423,010 198,920 (438,650) 12. ! 78,609 176,990 551,764 1,887,570 12,965,999 600,000 750,684 1,448,920 150,000 216300 98,484 285,900 Designations: Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 7,432,923 Conlinuing Appropriation 144.444 Debt Service Reserves: Encumbrances 300,000 Land Held for Resale 530,401 Long-term Receivables 3,013,892 Debt Service 600,000 Unreserved Fund Balanc~Equit~ June 30, 2000 $ 1,544,339 $ $ $ (l) Excludes amounts budgeted for capital outlay through the capital improvement program. (2) General Fund Operating Transfers Out includes a $725,000 transfer to the City's Capital Projecls Fund. The Capital Projects Fund is presented in the separate capital improvement program budget documenL (3) Redevelopmenl Agency fund balances at July 1, 1999 do not include amounts committed to the City's capital improvement progrant 1,448,920 32 City of Temecula CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continuea~ Revenues Other Sources: Operating Transfers In Long-term Debt Tolal Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Uses: Operating Transfers Out Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) Ex'pendimres and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July i, 1999 Fund Balance/Equily, June 30, 2000 Designations: Economic Uncerlainty/Contingencies Continuing Appropriations Debt Service Reserves: Encumbrances Long-term Receivables Debt Service Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 Ifisur~nce $ 448,910 448,910 (447,910) 1,000 !,404,698 1,405,698 $ 1.405.698 $ Vehicles 149,000 149,000 (12~200) 24,800 247,318 272,118 Internal Service Funds Information Systems $ 988,300 $ 233,000 1,221,300 (921,310) 299,990 489,745 789,735 Support Services -255,110 255,110 (250,230) 4,880 125,454 130,334 hcilitles $ 413,950 413,950 (413,950) 53,787 53,787 272.118. $ 789,735 $ 130,334 $ 53,787 33 CRy of Temecula CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continued) ReV~lln~ Other Sources: Operating Transfers in Long-term Debt Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Uses: Operating Transfers Out Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) Ex'pcnditures and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999 Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 Designations: Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies Continuing Appropriation Debt Service Reserves: Encumbrances Long-term Receivables Debt Service Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 Parks & Recreathm $ 4,119,060 $ '$. 4, 119,060 (3,826,650) (464,670) Community ~ervices District Service Service Level A Level B 297,530 $ 335,700 Service Level C 59'4,840 297,530 335.700 .59~840 (298,390) (335,700) (630,100) (172.260) (860) (35,260) 870.380 25.958 10.182 324.917 698, 120 25,098 10, 182 289,657 698,120 25,098 10,182 289,657 $ $ $ 34 City of Tetnecula ' CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continuet0 Community Services District Service Service Debt Level D Level R Service 2,32;4,410 $ 12,160 $ 35,600 464,670 Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Uses: Operating Transfers Out Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) Expenditures and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999 Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000' Designations: Economic Uncerlainty/Contingencies Continuing Appropriations Debt Service Reserves: Encumbrances Long-term Receivables Debt Service Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 2,324,410 12,160 500,270 (2,348,960) ( 17, 160) (500,270) (24,550) (5,000) 186,793 11~02 529,020 162,243 6,002 529,105 162,243 6,002 $ $ 26,415 502,690 35 City of Temecula GENERAL FUND REVENUES FY 99-00 GENERAL FUND REVENUES $26,521,800 Reimbursements Operating Transfers In 6.94% 3.32% "~ L Investment Interest Intergovernmental/~/ 3.49% 8.81% Other ................. ~ /='2.37% 3~: ~:!~!i:~!~!i!~i~ii:~!~i~::!::~::~;i!!i~::::!~::i~:::i~iii~i~ ....p~op~rty T.x 14.2 4 %~ ~ 1 :"' ........... : ~;; ~ .... i i · ... "' " . .... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ .?:".'., '~ ': '--:-':'-:'?:F::~::~::::~:~:~??;~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~E:~:~:~:~'FranchiM r .... '?rL,". -,r ,' "[~i= ~., ': ~,~ ,n~.Y.l~ 4.94% Transient OccupancyT~ ~"~ ~_ 3.91% ~ -- - ;~ ~S~ea Tax 47.08~ FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON $30 - $25 - $20 - $15 - $10 -~ .Actual 1996-97 ! A~ual 1997-98 .L 36 City of Temecula GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Actual FY 1996-97 Taxes and Franchises Property Tax Franchise Fees Sales and Use Tax Property Transfer Tax Transient Occupancy Tax 1,171,883 998,094 8,774,595 178,449 752,743 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges Business Licenses Engineering Building Planning Fire Plan Check and Inspection 150,220 1,094,608 1,415,960 343,591 115,578 Fines and Forfeitures 130,448 Use of Money Investment Interest 953,382 Intergovernmental Revenues Motor Vehicle in Lieu Motor Vehicle License Fees AB 3229 (COPS) Grants !,614,424 33,231 97,393 162,795 Reimbursement from 'Capital Improvement Program Community Services District Redevelopment Agency Other 216,133 162,000 75,000 60,542 Operating Transfers In Actual FY 1997-98 Miscellaneous Total $ 1,243,402 1,137,484 .'9,186,547 281,700 853,981 163,842 999,237 1,5833327 319,965 196,100 1%,529 1,197,461 1,755,091 51,263 99,245 168,848 222,237 162,000 125,000 25,873 796,905 840,564 104,561 95,949 $ 19,402,335 $ 20,885,745 Estimated FY 1998-99 $ 1,268,600 1,175,000 I0,400,000 275,000 990,000 175,000 1,200,000 2,100,000 409,000 215,000 251,000 1,100,000 1,900,700 34,000 105,200 45,000 530,000 162,000 125,000 20,000 827,000 127,800 $ 23,435,300 Projected FY 1999.4M) $ 1,300,600 1,311,500 12,487,000 295,000 1,036,000 185,000 1,200,000 1,762,500 409,000 220,000 273,000 925,000 2,076,000 51,000 106,000 103,600 1,553,000 162,0~0 125,000 881,100 59,500 $ 26,521,800 37 City of Temecula GAS TAX FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Actual Aetual FY L996-~/ FY 1997-~ Gas Tax Revenues $ 776,447 $ 788,981 Interest Revenue 15,379 7,784 MisceHam~s 4,605 Total $ 796,431 $ 796,765 $ 821,000 $ 876,600 $ 827,000 $ 881,100 FOUR YEAR COMPARISON $900 $7OO $500 Actual 1996-97 Actual 1997-98 Estimated 1998-99 itiGasTaxRevenues] Projected 1999-00 38 City of Temecula REVENUES BY FUND - CO,~L~!UNITY SERI/ICES DISTRICT Actual Actual FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 Parks and Recreation $ 3,359,968 $ 3,565,438 Service Level A 196,788 222,620 Service Level B 273 ,242 281,122 Service Level C 535,273 586,656 Service LeVel D 1,868,205 2,071,042 Service Level R 19,220 19,354 Debt Service * 36,487 36,010 Total $ 6,289, i 83 $ 6,782,242 Estimated FY 1998-99 3,632,610 281,800 313,840 591,180 2,277,690 12,880 35,600 7,145,600 * Does not'include operating transfer from Parks and Recreation. FOUR YEAR COMPARISON $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 A~ual FY 1996~7 A~ual FY 1997~8 [] Parks and Recreation [] Service Level A · Service Level D [] Service Level R Estimated FY 1998-99 [] Service Level B · Debt Service Projected FY 1999-00 $ 4, 119,060 297,530- 335,700 594,840 2,324,410 12,160 35,600 $ 7,719,300 $7,719,300 ] Projected FY 1999-00 [] Service Level C 39 Ci~ of Temecula REFENUES BY FUND- REDEFELOPMENT AGENCY Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY 1997-98 Estimated FY 1998-99 Projected FY 1999-00 Low/Moderate Income Set Aside $ 1,575,790 $ Redevelopment* 738,934 Debt Service 6,360,602 Total $ 8,675,326 $ 1,579,372 623,800 5,859,588 8,062,760 $ $ 1,336,100 331,000 5,483,200 7,150,300 1,269,000 113,100 5,778,570 7,160,670 *Does not include operating transfers from Debt Service Fund. I I $8,675,326 I FOUR YEAR COMPARISON $9,000,000 $8,000,000 " $7,000,000. I['_ $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 Actual FY 1996-97 IS8,062,760 I I$7,150,3(N} I Actual FY 1997-98 Estimated FY 1998-99 Projected FY 1999-00 II Low/Mod Set Aside [] Redevelopment [] Debt Service I 40 CI'his Page Intentionally Left Blank) 41 City of Temecula EXPENDITURES BY DEP, IRTMENT- GENERAL FUND City Council ($693,500) Non-Departmental ($2, 186,000) '~ Animal Control ($55 000) ....... Police ($6,333,180) ~-~=.'--',.'--2~. Public Works/ ($4.508,160) City Manager ($1 651 310) Community Development _ -'~" ~ ~ ../($4,575,000) !ii; ~;~ ~ '~--Fir~($2,795,060) ($1,010,940) Fiscal Year 1999-00 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES $24,776,410 (excluding operating transfers) 42 City of Tenwcula EXPENDITURE SU~!~!ARY BY CATEGORY- GENERAL FUND Department City Council: City Council $ Community Support City Manager: City Manager Economic Development Human Resources City Allomey City Clerk Finance Community Development: Planning Building & Safety Land Developmen| Public Works: Public Works 'CIPAdministration Police Fir~ Animal Control Non-Departmental Total $ Personnel 69,230 S 426,450 211,570 151,700 367,640 687,430 1,176,770 1,216,650 773,260 964,370 1,365,390 23,730 26,000 7,460,190 $ Openttiom & Maintenance 219,770 404,500 204,070 $ 524,020 131,500 347,500 253,120 323,510 555,370 590,440 226,060 1,96~670 186,130 6,300,450 ~769,060 55,000 2,186,000 17.246.170 $ Capi~l Outlay 2,000 24,000 9,950 2,500 21,100 1,500 9,000 $ 70.050 $ opentang 958,000 958,000 $ Toml 289,000 632,520 735,590 283,2000 347,500 620,760 1,010,940 1,756,140 1,81~040 1,001,820 2,955,140 i,553,020 6,333,180 2,795,060 3,144,000 25,734,410 43 C~y of Tm~cula EXPENDITURE SU,~!MARY BY CATEGORY- CO,II211UNFIT $ERtqCES DISTRICT FUNDS Operatiom Fund Personnel & Maintenance Parks and Recreation* $ 1,578,870 $ 2,219,280 $ Sendco Level A 2,890 295,500 Service Level B 335,700 Sotvice Level C 114,420 515,680 Service Level D 27,440 2,321,520 Service Level R 17,160 Debt Service 500,270 Tolal $ !,723,620 $ 6,205,110 $ Capital Outlay 28,500 $ 28300 $ Ol~ratin~ Transfers Total 3,826,650 298,390 335,700 630,100 2,348,960 17,160 500,270 7,957.230 * Does not include $464,670 operating transfer ~o lhe Debt Service Fund. Service Level D -(52,348,960 .-\ Service Level R (S13,230) Debt Service (S500,270) Parks and Retreation ($3,826,650) / Service Level B (s3so,g4o) ~__Service Level A ($298,390) 44 City of Temtcula EXPENDITURE .~ U.~II~ IA R Y BY CATEGORY- INTERNAL .,~ ER | q CE FUND.~ Operations Fund Personnel & Maintenance lnsuranc~ $ 32,330 $ 415,580 V~icles 124,200 Information Systnns 251.550 669,760 Suppo~ Services 69,930 180,300 Facilities 194.200 192,250 $ Total $ 548.010 $ 1.582.090 $ Capital Outlay 27,500 27.500 $ operating $ $ ToM 447,910 124,200 921,310 250,230 413,950 2.157.600 Support Services . /Facilities ($413,950) · ($250'230) ' "i/;: :::: :: I surance ($447,910) :: Information Systems/\~'' ($921,310) (124,200) 45 C~ of Tea~cula F..XPENDITURE SU~I.~!AR Y BY CATEGORY- RED EI"ELOP. IIIENT AGENCY FUND,.~ Operations Fund Personnel & Maintenance Low/lvlod~rate Income Set Aside $ 202,150 $ 643,840 Rodevelopmont 84,430 935,!50 Debt S~rvicc 5,111,820 Total $ 286.580 $ 6.690.810 Capital Outlay Opemtin~ Tram fen $ $ 1, 105,400 $ 1.105.400 $ Tolal 845,990 1,019,580 6,217,220 8.082.790 46 (This Page/ntentionally Left Blank) 47 Cit~ o./' Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMAR Y B Y DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND Four Year Comparison CITY COUNCIL Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Personnel $ 62,674 $ 61,729 $ Operations &Maintenance 179, 168 174,066 Capital Outlay Total $ 241,842 $ 235,795 $ Program: Community Support Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay 69,580 $ 208,560 Total 278,140 $ CITY MANAGER Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total 69,230 219,770 289,000 Program: Economic Development Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay $ 209,506 $ 169,981 $ 458,923 $ 404,500 Total $ 209,506 $ 169,981 $ 458,923 $ 404,500 Program: Human Resources Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total 374,140 $ 344,485 $ '151,569 158,582 1,080 439,429 $ 248,203 426,450 204,070 2,000 $ 525,709 $ 504,147 $ 687,632 $ 632,520 215,450 $ 598,067 $ $ $ $ $ $ 813,517 $ 211;570 524,020 735,590 $ 187,765 $ 184,055 $ 199,830 $ 151,700 115,169 128,919 145,440 131,500 $ 302,934 $ 312,974 $ 345,270 $ 283,200 48 City of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND (Cont'd) Four Year Comparison (Continued) CITY ATTORNEY ' Personnel ' Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 402,479 $ '286,034 $ 400,000 $ 347,500 Total $ 402,479 $ 286,034 $ 400,000 $ 347,500 CITY CLERK Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay 295,636 $ 305,580 $ 214,299 192,462 1,723 406,650 $ 211,131 Total 367,640 253,120 FINANCE $ 509,935 $ 499,765 $ 617,781 $ 620,760 Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Program: Planning Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Program: Building & Safety Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total 504,657 $ 566,809 $ 659,200 $ 252,928 240,777 330,874 1,701 3,478 687,430 323,510 $ 757,585 $ 809,287 $ 993,552 $ 1,010,940 685,464 $ 869,209 $ 1,027,220 $ 1,176,770 279,037 409,572 650,549 555,370 2,797 79,794 24,000 $ 964,501 $ 1,281,578 $ 1,757,563 $ 1,756,140 597,319 $ 632,845 $ 860,650 $ 1,216,650 428,295 479,125 532,559 590,440 780 6,750 9,950 $ 1,025,614 $ 1,112,750 $ 1,399,959 $ 1,817,040 49 City of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND (Cont'd) Four Year Comparison (Continued) Program: Land Development Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Personnel $ 592,251 $ 682,381 $ Operations &Maintenance 155,583 143,757 Capital Outlay 302 Total $ 747,834 $ 826,440 $ PUBLIC WORKS Personnel $ 449,797 $ Operations &Maintenance 1,266,390 Capital Outlay 33,814 Total $ 1,750,001 $ Program: CIP Administration Personnel $ 510,159 $ Operations &Maintenance 88,564 Capital Outlay Total $ 598.723 $ POLICE - Personnel $ ': Operations & Maintenance $ 4,385,095 Capital Outlay 116,615 Total $ 4,501,710 $' FIRE Personnel $ 3,202 Operations &Maintenance 1,399,205 $ Capital Outlay 25,600 Total $ 1,428,007 $ 575,565 $ 1,249,700 46,927 1,872,192 $ 455,067 $ 98,023 553,090 $ 9,977 $ 4,946,479 32,808 4,989,264 $ 1,451,875 $ 483 1,452,358 $ 779,370 $ 224,350 2,510 1,006,230 $ 816,590 $ 1,907,943 22,586 2,747,119 $ 800,260 $ 194,800 9,410 1,004,470 $ 45,671 $ 5,623,183 9,000 5,677,854 $ 2,153,626 $ 20,884 2,174,510 $ 773,260 226,060 2,500' 1,001,820 964,370 1,969,670 21,100 2,955,140 1,365,390 186,130 1,500 1,553,020 23,730 6,300,450 9,000 6,333,180 2,795,060 2,795,060 50 City of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND (Cont'd) Four Year Comparison (Continued) ANIMAL CONTROL Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total NON-DEPARTMENTAL Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Operating Transfers Out Total Actual ACtual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 35,699 $ 39,900 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 35,699 $ 39,900 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 880,972 $ 1,186,877 $ 1,470,020 $ 3,408,872 7,574,700 7,320,165 $ 4,289,844 $ 8,761,577 $ 8,790,185 $ General Fund Total $ 18,291,923 $ 23,707,132 $ 29,207,705 $ 2; 186,000 958,000 3,144,000 25,734,410 51 Ci~ of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND - COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Four Year Comparison PARKS & RECREATIONs Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1998-99 Personnel $ 1,124,006 $ 1,237,077 $ 1,467,120 $ Operations &Maintenance 1,628,368 1,734, 118 2, 134,868 Capital Outlay 22.846 2,759 15,500 Total $ 2,775,220 $ 2,973,954 $ 3,617,488 $ SERVICE LEVEL A Personnel $ 2,678 $ 2,776 $ 2,850 $ Operations & Maintenance 194,303 208,890 280,368 Capital Outlay Total $ 196,981 $ 211,666 $ 283,218 $ SERVICE LEVEL B Personnel $ 6,839 $ 6,839 $ 7,430 Operations &Maintenance 280, 124 292,816 343,410 $ Capital Outlay Total $ 286.963 $ 299,655 $ 350,840 $ SERVICE LEVEL C Personnel .$ 113,930 $ 92,441 $ 119,490 $ Operations &Maintenance 440,037 435,837 503,718 Capital Outlay Total $ 553,967 $ 528,278 $ 623,208 $ 1,578,870 2,219,280 28,500 3,826,650 2,890 295,500 298,390 335,700 335,700 114,420. 515,680 630,100 * Does not include operating transfer to the Debt Service Fund. 52 City of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMAR Y B Y FUND - COMMUNITY' SER VICES DISTRICT Four Year Comparison (Continued) SERVICE LEVEL D Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed' FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 43,846 $ 39,736 $ 43,680 $ 27,440 1,754, 111 . 2,080,080 2,234,010 2,321,520 $ 1,797,957 $ 2,119,816 $ 2,277,690 $ 2,348,960 SERVICE LEVEL R Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total $ 9,940 $ 20,931 $ 13,230 $ 17,160 $ 9,940 $ 20,931 $ 13,230 $ 17,160 DEBT SERVICE Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total $ 501,600 $ 500,995 $ 501,980 $ 500,270 $ 501,600 $ 500,995 $ 501,980 $ 500,270 Community ServicesDistTotal- $ 6,122,628 $ 6,655,295 $ 7,667,654 $ 7,957,230 53 City of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Four Year Comparison Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed INSURANCE FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Personnel $ 27,984 $ 20,243 $ Operations &Maintenance 452,579 370,727 Capital Outlay Total $ 480,563 $ 390,970 $ VEHICLES Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total INFORMATION SYSTEMS Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total SUPPORT SERVICES Personnel OperatiOns & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total FACILITIES Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total 31,780 $ 32,330 415,850 415,580 447,630 $ 447,910 $ 46,914 $ 58,791 $ 95,610 $ 124,200 $ 46,914 $ 58,791 $ 95,610 $ 124,200 $ 133,209 $ 139,112 $ 179,690 $ 251,550 486,348 546,931 662,812 669,760 $ 619,557 $ 686,043 $ 842,502 $ 921,310 $ 33,982 $ 34,675 $ 71,500 $ 69,930 171,172 185,178 195,205 180,300 $ 205,154 $ 219,853 $ 266,705 $ 250,230 $ 108.667 $ 135,507 $ 165,120 $ 194,200 244,247 139,293 212,444 192,250 27,306 32,500 27,500 $ 352,914 $ 302,106 $ 410,064 $ 413,950 Internal Senrice Fund Total $ 1,705,102 $ 1,657,763 $ 2,062,511 $ 2,157,600 54 City of Temecula EXPENDITURE SUMMAR Y B Y FUND - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Four Year Comparison LOW/MODERATE INCOME SET ASIDE Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total REDEVELOPMENT Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outl3y Total DEBT SERVICE* Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 65,777 $ -209,872 309,157 361;816 14,979 $ 374,934 $ 586,667 $ 136,249 $ 219,967 1,136,389 661,349 7,780 $ 1,272,638. $ 889,096 $ 5,237,153 $ 5,120,426 $ 5,237,153 $ 5,120,426 Redevelopment Agency Totals $ 6,884,725 $ 6,59~,189 $ 187,270 885,470 $ 1,072,740 $ 90,480 829,246 3,000 $ 922,726 $ 4,899,270 $ 4,899,270 $ 6,894,736 $ 202,150 643,840 $ 845,990 $ 84,430 935,150 $ 1,019,580 $ 5,111,820 $ 5,111,820 $ 6,977,390. *Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund. 55 City of Temecula AUTHORIZED POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 P'Y 1998-99 FY 1999-00 City Council 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 City Manager 7.00 7.50 10.50 10.00 City Clerk 5.50 6.00 6.00 6.00 Finance 9.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 Community Development Planning 11.10 11.50 12.00 12~00 Building &Safety 10.00 11.00 11.00 16.00 Land Development 10.60 9.90 10.60 9.85 Public Works 14.40 '20.60 23.90 26.40 Community Services 17.75 18.65 19.65 21.90 Internal Service Funds 5.75 5.85 5.85 6.35 Redevelopment Agency 2.90 4.50 3.00 3.00 Total Authorized Positions 99.00 110.50 -117.50 127.50 TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS - 127.5 Cornunity Services. Intemal Service (21.90) - Funds (6.35) Public Works (26.40)-X~X .......... ~ l~N .~~City Manager(lO. O0) !'~..?~ . ~. ~ · .--,-~.-- . ... U. City Council (5.00) !"~"""'~/' ~"~~ ~ _/-- 'J' City Clerk (6.00) Community Development (37.85) 56 City of Temecula PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND CITY COUNCIL Councilmembers CITY MANAGER City Manager Assistant City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant to the City Manager Senior Management Analyst Management Analyst Executive Assistant Human Resources Specialist Human Resources Assistant Marketing Coordinator Administrative Secretary Office Specialist Total CITY CLERK City Clerk/Director of Suppen Services Deputy Director of Support Services Records Coordinator Administrative Secretary Office SpecialiSt Office Assistant Total FINANCE Director of Finance Assistant Finance Director Senior Management Analyst Senior Accountant Accountant Administrative Secretary Accounting Specialist Purchasing Specialist Accounting Assistant Total Authorized 1998-99 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 10.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.0O 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 2.50 1.00 1.00 10.00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1.00) 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (1.00) (0.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 LO0 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 0.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 2.50 1.00 2.00 11.00 57 City of Temecula PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING Authorized 1998-99 Deputy City Manager Planning Manager Senior Planner Associate Planner Development Processing Coordinator GIS Analyst Assistant Planner Community Development Technician Administrative Secretary Community Development Aide Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 (2.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 12.00 0.00 12.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING & SAFETY Chief Building Official Deputy Building Official Senior Building Inspector Plan Checker / Building Inspector Building Inspector II Code Enforcement Officer Community Development Technician Building Inspector I Administrative Secretary Office Specialii;t . 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 11.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - LAND DEVELOPMENT Director of Public Works/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Director Senior Engineer Associate Engineer Permit Engineer Senior Public Works Inspector Assistant' Engineer Public Works Inspector Community Development Technician Administrative Secretary Office Assistant 0.30 0.30 ! .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.75 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1.00) 0.00 0.25 (0.75) Total 10.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.25 1.00 9.85 58 City of Temecula PERSONNEL ALLOCM TION BY DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS Director of pUblic Works/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Director Senior Engineer Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Associate Engineer Senior Public Works Inspector Assistant Engineer Senior Management Analyst Managemenl Analyst Landscape Inspector Administrative Secretary Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Total General Fund Total Authorized 1998-99 0.70 0.70 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 · 4.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.75 3.00 3.00 2.25 23.90 89.00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (0.50) 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.25) 2.50 7.25 Proposed 1999-00 0.70 0.70 3.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 3.00 3.00 2.00 26.40 96.25 COMMUNITY SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DirectOr of Community Services Deputy Director of Community Services Maintenance Superintendent Development Services Administrator Recreation Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Development Services Analyst Senior Landscape Inspector Museum Services Manager Recreation Supervisor Administrative Secretary Recreation Coordinator Landscape Inspector Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Custodian Total 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.75 1.00 0.95 0.00 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.10 1.00 16.90 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 (0.25) 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.50 0.50 0.20 0.00 2.55 1.00' 1.00 0.70 0.80 1.00 0.70 0.20 0.50 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 0.25 1.50 1.50 2.30 1.00 19.45 59 City of Temecula PERSONNEL ALLOCATION B Y DEPAR TALENT SERVICE LEVEL A Development Services Analyst SERVICE LEVEL B Development Services Analyst Office Assistant Total SERVICE LEVEL C Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Senior Landscape Inspector Development Services Analyst Landscape InspeCtor Office Assistant Total SERVICE LEVEL D Development Services Administrator Development Services Analyst Office Assistant Total Community Services Total INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS INSURANCE Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Total Authorized 1998-99 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.60 0.70 0.00 0.25 1.65 0.25 0.15 0.50 0.90 19.65 0.25 0.25 0.50 Changes 0.00 (o. lo) (0.05) (o. 15) 0.00 (0.05) (0.10) (0.1 O) 0.50 0.05 0.30 (0.05) 0.00 (0.40) (0.45) 2.25 0.0 0.0 0.0 Propoaed 1999-00 0.05' ' 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.30 1.95 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.45' 21.90 0.25 0.25 0.50 6O City of Temecula PERSONNEL ALLOCA TI ON B Y DEPARTMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Sy.stems Administrator Information Systems Specialist Total SUPPORT SERVICES Administrative Technician FACILITIES Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Facilities Coordinator Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Total Internal Service Fund Total REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOW/MOD HOUSING H0using/Redevelopment Manager Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Total CIP/REDEVELOPMENT Housing/Redevelopment Manager Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Total Redevelopment Agency Total Authorized 1998-99 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 0,25 0,00 1,00 0,00 1,00 0,10 2,35 5,85 0,75 0,75 0,50 2.00 0,25 0,25 0,50 1,00 3,00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,30 0,00 0,50 (0,50) 0,20 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,25 0,30 1,00 0,50 0,50 0,30 2,85 6,35 0.75 0.75 0.50 2.00 0,25 0,25 0,50 1,00 3,00 TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 117,50 10,00 127,50 61 Cr'his Page Intentionally Left Blank) 62 Cit~ of ~emecu~ GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW The following section is an expenditure summary and narrative account of the General Fund Operating Budget. The City functions have been categorized by department and operating program and are presented in the following order: DEPARTMENT City Council City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Finance Community Development Planning Building and Safety Land Development/Engineering Public Works Police Fire Animal Control Non-Departmental 63 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY COUNCIL I I Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Eleven J. Ford Jeffrey E. Stone Citi2~ns of Temecula Councilmeml~' Jeff Com~c, he~'o I Councilmember Karel F. Lindemans I Councilmember Ronald H. Roberts CiO, of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY COUNCIL Funding Source: Actual Actual Budgeted Exoenditure Summary FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 Personnel $ 62,674 $ 61,729 S 69,580 Operations &Maintenance 179,168 174,066 208,560 Capital Outlay Total $ 241,842 $ 235,795 $ 278,140 General Fund Proposed. Fir 1999-00 $ 69,230 219,770 $ 289,000 Expenditure Summan, Persom~el Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Toml Funding Source: Actual Actual Budgeted FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 $ 209,506 $ 169,981 $ 458,923 $ 209,506 $ 169,981 $ 458,923 General Fund Proposed $ 404,500 404,500 Personnel Allocation Councilmember Total Authorized 1998-99 Changes 0.00 Proposed 199900 65 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY COUNCIL Program: City Council MISSION: The City Council is elected by the citizens of Temecula to set legislative policy and to identify the types and levels of programs and services to be provided by the City. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Rejuvenated Old Town through completion of the Old Town Streetscape project · Lobbied for and received $8 million in ISTEA funding for road construction · Programmed over $120 million in funded projects through the five-year Capital Improvement Program, including over $79 million in traffic improvement construction projects * Assisted with the formation of the Southwest Riverside County Economic Development Corporation · Participated in the groundbreaking ceremony for the Promenade Regional Mall OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE A SAFE, SECURE, CLEAN, HEALTHY, AND ORDERLY COMMUNITY BY BALANCING THE UTILIZATION OF OPEN SPACE, PARKS, TRAIL FACILITIES, QUALIFY JOBS, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, AND ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE. ~ Encourage recreational and educalional programs for all age groups. · ~ Preserve natural resources while stimulating technology and promoting commerce. ~ Adopt City Ordinances using sound fiscal policy. ¢- Enhance and revjtalive historic, areas. ., Provide clear policy direction to City staff in programs and services to be offered by the City of Temecula. ¢- Adopt policies and procedures using legislative action which is consistent with City ¢- Encourage local job creation through retention and atWaction efforts. ENHANCE COMMUNICATION TO ENSURE THAT CITIZtNS ARE WELL INFORMED ON COMMUNITY ISSUES. Provide a City Council hotline whereby citizens can call and provide comments on specific City issues. Conduct Community Workshops to educate citizens about Year 2000 issues. Distribute quarterly newsletters to update the community on capital projects, recreational events, and other community items of interest. · ~' Use City Council meeting intermissions to disseminate community information and notices. City of T emecula DEPARTMEg SUMMARY- CITY COUNCIL Program: City Council (Continued) OBJECTIVES: IMPROVE THE CITY'S INFLUENCE IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND INTRAGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS. Lobby State legislators to ensurelhey support positions that further the City's Lobby Federal legislators to obtain Federal funds forthe City's transportation. system upgrades. Continue City Council member attendance and participation on local, regional, statewide, and national boards and commissions. Continue joint meetings with the Temecula Valley Unified School District Governing Board so that the two governing cntilies arc working towards common Work closely with City of Temecula Commissions through joint meetings and Commissioner participalion during Council meetings. Coordinate efforts with the City of Murrieta, particularly in the areas of Waffic circulation and economic development Continue to support the Temccula Sister City Association to enhance foreign relations with Teraecula's Sister Cities. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Percent of citizen concerns reconciled -within 5 business days of receipt Number of citizen concern correspondences addiessed Number of community newsletters published Number of meetings with outside organizations PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 PROJECTED ff 1999/00 N/A N/A 90% 95% ' 250 408 500 600 4 3 4 4 N/A N/A 198 200 N/A: information not available 67 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUAtMARY- CITE COUNCIL Program: Community Support MISSION: The Community Support program is responsible for funding various special programs Within th~ City, sigh I$ the Commmlnity Se/vi~s Funding Progr~_m, Library fundin~ Sister Cities and Temecula Educatio.nal Apprenticeship Model. It also funds the Temecula Valley Arts Council and the Temecula Valley Playhouse providing cultural events to the ~ommunity. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHlVlENTS: · Funded a Volunteer Coordinator for the Temecula Library. · Approved a Citywide Cultural Arts Plan. · Assisted in fumling Temecula Valley Unified School District student exghanges to the sister cities of Voorburg, the Netherlands and Nakayama, Japan. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVE: FUND LOCAL NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS WHICH PROVIDE THE CITizeNS OF TEMECULA CULTURAL EVENTS, NEEDED SERVICES OR EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY. Continue with a funding form,l~, which commits 0.75% of the General Fund budget to the Community Services Funding Progra~ PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of organizations funded · Total funding for orgaDiTatiol~omrulmity Percent of General Fund budget used for Community Sendces Funding Program Number of students funded for exchange trips to sister dries PRO~ECTED FY 1997/98 28 $161,271 .88% 19 ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 38 38 40 $169, 981 $458,000 $404,500 .55% 1.03% .76% 19 21 30 68 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY MANAGER I GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Public Information Inl~rgov~r~i~lhll Public Relations Animal Corlrol CITY MANAGER Shawn D. Nelson ASSISTAlqT CITY MANAOER Xam=s O'Orsdy I DEPUTY CITY MANAOBR Gary Thornhill ASSISTAlqT TO THE CITY MANAG~ Orant Yates I HUMAN RESOURCES I E1VIBRC}ENCY MANAOBIVlBNT ECONOiVffC DEVELOPMENT -- Training -- ~-rr~,loycc Rclatiom -- Preparedness Coordimtion -- Ermrgmgy Operatiom Center Business Allfaction Business Rctcxtion Marlceling Labor Developxx~ 69 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY MANAGER Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 $ 374,140 $ 151,569 $ 525,709 $ Funding Source: Actual Budgeted FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 344,485 $ 439,429 -158,582 248,203 1,080 504,147 $ 687,632 GenemlFund Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 426,450 204,070 2,000 $ 632,520 Program: Economic Development Exnenditur~ Summary(I] Personnel Opc~tions & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 $ $ $ $ Funding Source: Actual Budgeted FY 1997-98 FY 199899 $ 215,450 598,067 $ 813,517 C_.memlFund Proposed FY 1999-00 211,570 524,020 $ 735,590 Expenditure Summan' PersolmeI OperatiOns & Maintenance Capital Outlay Actual FY 1996-97 187,765 $ 115,169 Total $ 302,934 $ Funding Source: Actual FY1997-98 184,055 128,919 Budgeted FY 1998-99 $ 199,830 145,440 312,974 $ 345,270 Proposed FY 1999-.00 $ '151,700 131,500 $ 283,200 ( 1 ) 1996-97 and 1997-98 costs were reflected in the Redevelopmerit Agency budget 70 CiO~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY MANAGER Personnel Allocation CityMana~ Assistant City Mana~ D~puty City ~ Assistant to tl~ City Mma$~ Senior Ivlamgem~ Analyst Ivlatmg, e~mt Analyst Exeeutiv~ Assistant Human R~3urees Specialist Human Resources Assistant Marketing Coerdinater Adminislrativ~ S~tary Department Total Authorized 199lb99 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1:00 1.00 0,50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Change~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1.00) 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (1,00) Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10.00 71 City of Temeeula DEPAR TM~NT SUAIHAR Y - CITY MA NA GER Program: General Administration MISSION: The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to serve as the Chief Adrnini.qraflve Officer d the orBanization. The City Manages Office coordinmes the hnplcmcntation of policy and programg established by the City Council. The City lvlanagcr proxridcs overall direction to the administration (ff City .programs and services; monitors animal control; implemems inter-dcpamnentnl program~ for h:rnnn ~, Strategic planning and emergency preparedness; and coordinates inter-govcmmcntal relations, lobbying and public relations efforts. GOAL 1: OIHECTIVES: ORIECTWES: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 4: OBJECTIVES: COORDINATE THE WORK EffORTS OF ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS TO ACHIEVE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY GOAL& Conduct weekly staff meetings with all Depamnent Directors to ensure work efforts arc coordinated effectively. Conduct an annual Department Director retreat to establish service level and program goals. Respond to all dtizen complaints within a timely manner. COORDINATE AND PROVIDE TEVIELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA REGARDING CITY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES, ~ Prepare timely press releases regarding City events and activities. ¢* Continue to have open communication with media regarding City progr~mg. REPRESENT THE CITY'S. INTERESTS IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL Attend monthly Westem Riverside Council of Governments Technical Advisory Committee Meetings. Track legishtive bffis and provide support/opposition as requested or required. Encourage department directors or assigned staff to attend relevant intergovernmental meetings and report on pertinent issues. UPHOLD THE CITY'S HIGH QUALITY IMAGE BY PROACTIVELY SUPPORTING EMPLOYEES IN MAINTAINING POSITIVE CITIZEN RELATIONS. Provide training to all employees on the imporlance of positive customer sexyice and public rclalions efforts. Facilitate staff and City Council workshops to obtain public input regarding various City projects. 72 City of Temecula DEPAR TMENT SUA~tMAR Y - CITY MANA GER Program: General Administration (Continued) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of press briefings held Number of legislative responses submitted ' Number of community workshops held PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY1997/98 FY1997/98 FY1998/99 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 10 2 2 5 PROJECTED FY 1999/00 6 15 .4 73 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY MANAGER Program: Human Resources MISSION: Human Resources is responsible for providing a comprehensive human resources program throughout the City. Responsibilities of Human Resources include the administration of recruitment; sele~ti.'on; equal opportunity; classification; salary; employee benefits; worker's compensation; discipline; training development; employee relations; and development and implementation of personnel policies. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Implemented City's Administrative Guidelines · Implemented City of Temecula Safety Manual · Instituted a Human Resources Management information database GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT TO ALL DEPARTMENTS IN THE AREAS OF RECRUITMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, WORKER'S COMPENSATION, DISCIPLINE AND LABOR RELATIONS. Maintain a six-week recruitment processing timeline. Administer Employee Benefit programs to include conducting annual open enrollment and providing input to benefit providers.' Conduct monthly employee safety meetings to implement the City's injury and illness prevention program. o:' Administer employee recognition program, including quarterly Temecula Pride/Good Deed Award luncheons. Meet quarterly with employee union representatives to discuss areas of mutual interest. · :- Maintain City Hall bulletin boards. PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING EMPLOYEES. OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY o:- Publish a list of in-house training opportunities as determined by the C.I.T.Y. training committee. · :. Proactively involve employees in training opportunities, both in-house and outside. · :- Facilitate bi-monthly management training luncheons. · :' Provide three (3) training days per year for each City employee. · :. Schedule management for Supervisors and Management Academics. 74 City of Temecula D EPAR TA,IE NT S UlvI~IA R Y - CITY MA NA G ER Program: Human Resources (Continued) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of recruilments conducted Percent of recruitments within a six-week timeline Number of apptications processed Number of Worker' s Compensation claims processed Number of employee safety meetings Number of quarterly employee group meetings Number of training days provided Number of employees reco~t, niTed Number of Temecula Pride Luncheons Number of Administrative Support Group Percent of evalualions' ,ocessed within prescribed timeframes PROXECTgD ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 ~ 1997/98 FY 1998/99 30 33 30 95% 95% 95% PROJECTED FY 1999/00 40 95% 1,200 1,045 1,200 1,500 10 6 12 10 11 11 11 10. 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 N/A N/A 20 20 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 N/A N/A 90% 93% 75 Oty of Temecula DEPARTMENT S~Y - CITY MANA GER Program: Emergency Management MISSION: In case of emergency, She City M~rm~ez is the Disaster Direaor. The mission of this program is to implement, monitor and coordinaU~ the Standardized Emergency Ma,mgement System and Emergency Operations Center. This program also provides overall coordination and training, and monitors the operational readiness within the VariO!lS SeCtiOnS Of the efflergency rrmtmge!llent of~paniT~tiolla] strt!cttlfe. This program promotes increased ppJparedness Of Temecula citizens to respond to disaster. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Sponsored a Safety Expo, including Statewide K-9 Trials · 0ut~ed_ the Commlmity Recreation Center BOC with an emergency back-up generator · Installed pa~c buttons in strategic locations in City Hall · Implemented a fire drill program · lmplovod th~ 81llbulanc~ 8~rvic~ to the OOmmlllity by providing an additional ambulanc~ dedicated to serving Temecula GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: OBJECTIVE: ENSURE ALL CITY EMPLOYEES ARE ADEQUATELY TRAINED ON HOW TO REACT AND WHAT ROLE TO ASSUME DURING AN EMERGENCY. Send employees through the County of Riversidc's Planning/Logistics course. Continue to work through the emergency management committee to implement the updated Multi-H~7~rd Function Plan: '~' Continue to Wain employees by simulating actual City disasters. INFORM/INVOLVE THE COMMUNITY IN THE C1TY'S DISASTER PLANS. · ~. Coordinate with the Fire Department and the Neighborhood Watch Program to develop a plan to involve homeowners' associations with disaster preparedness plans. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Numbcr Of employees trained in Emergency Management courses Number of meetings/training drills held PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 30 66 40 85 12 7 16 20 76 DEPARTMENT SUA4MARY- CITY MANAGER Program: Economic Development MISSION: The Economic Development Program is responsible for maintaining a so, rid and diverse economic base for the City. 1998..99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Received one of Califomi~'s Top. 30 Golden Bear Cities Award by Outlook Publication recognizing Temecula for emrepreneurial spirit and economic revival · Received the Council for Urban Economic Development Gold Award for Temecula's Tottrim newsletter · Planned and conducted the "Prelude to the Promenade Mail" groundbreaidng · Completed and preseated an Boonomic Developmeat Strategy to the City Council · Produced a Temecula ~ Brochure for prospective businesses · Developed an Employee Relocation Program to assist businesses relocating to Temecula · Instrumental in the approval of over 1.2 million square feet in retail development 'and over 800,000 square feet in industrial developmeat projects OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: DEVELOP A STRONG BASE OF CLEAN MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES WHICH EMPLOY A S/fllz.gD LABOR FORCE AND CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO TEMECULA'S COMMUNITY CHARACTER. Attract and retain industry that complements Temecula's character and takes advantage of Temecula's location for ease of goods movement and corporate mobility. Encourage the growth and expansion of existing indusUy by providing high quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance. Maintain a local regulatory environment that is favorable to Clean indusUy. Provide technical assistance to industries that will be affected by new regional air quality regulations and other regional regulations. DIVERSIFY THE ECONOMIC BASE TO INCLUDE A RANGE OF MANUFACTURING, RETAIL AND SERVICE ACTIVITIES, AND VINTNERS. Provide for industrial land uses which facilitate a variety of user types, including manufacturing. storage and distribution, office, and research and development space. Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use and will adapt to Temecula's economic conditions. Promote development of properly located and well-designed connnercial centers to meet the diverse service needs of the City. Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appfiances. 77 City of Temecula DEPART'A4ENT SUA,tMART - CITY.a,IANA GER Program: Economic Development (Continued) OBJECTIVES: GOAL 4: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 5: OBJECTIVES: · Use redevelopment powers and opportunities to enimnc~ development opportunities. MAINTAIN AN ECONOMIC BASE TO PROVIDE A SOUND FISCAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CITY AS WELL AS QUALITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND HIGH SERVICE LEVELS. Encourage a pslRn~ of development that bnlnnces revenue generating !and uses in ' phase with other uses that have negntive fiscal impacts. Encourage the growth or relocation of industries that genera~ tax and employment Evaluate fiscal impacts af development on an on-going basis and provide appropriate mitigation strategies. Take advantage of Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Temecula as a retailing center along the ln~te 15 corridor. ESTABLISH A DIVERSE EDUCATION, TRAINING AND JOB PLACEMENT SYSTEM WHICH WHjL DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY WORK FORCE IN TEMECULA. Support economic development goals through a range of education and Waining activities. Establish a proactive periodic dialogue early in the planning process between the City and educational institutions, including school districts and community colleges, on issues related to the phasing of development, service standards and demnnds. Explore the potential for a comprehensive extension center through the University of California Riverside and/or the California State University system. PROMOTE THE ADVANTAGES TO BUSINESSES LOCATING IN TEMECULA, INCLUDING COST ADVANTAGES, AMENITIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND CMC SERVICES. Target high quality businesses from the following industry categories: smnll to mid- sized; high-tech manufacturing and communication services; paper; plastics; health- related n~mfacturing sen, ices; and vineyardst~dnlners. Develop and msinlain a narkeling progrmn to publicize the virtues of Temecula. Monitor the economic conditions in Temecula in comparison to other locations in California and ~m}ughout the nation to determine relative advantages. Track prospects and closures of businesses for relocations and expansions. Monitor the supply of housing in feintion to the supply of jobs interms of balancing area-wide jobs, households, worker earnings and housing expenses. Monitor existing b~,~/nesses in Temecul~ Upgrade retention programs and increase number of retention visits. 78 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY MANAGER Economic Development (Continued) GOAL 6: - OBJECTIVES: Facilitate the establishment of a Work Force Development Center in Temecula to address the training needs of both business and the labor pool. DEVELOP TEMECULA AS A COMPREHENSIVE, RECOGNIZABLE TOURIST DESTINATION, WITH A RANGE OF ATTRACTIONS THROUGHOUT AND BEYOND THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE. Increase the number of tourists visiting Temecula including overnight visits and increase attendance at all Temecula special events through a comprehensive marketing program. Continue cooperative efforts with the winemaking industry in the Temecula Valley to promote Temecula as a destination resorL Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local tourism and to improve its attractiveness, accessibility, and economic vitality. Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities, including performing arts and museums. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of City relocation/expansion inquiries Number of retention visits Number ofbnsiness relocations Number of business expansions Number of incentive packages awarded to draw businesses PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 NA N/A 175 200 120 8 67 90 3 5 5 5 2 4 20 4 N/A N/A 3 5 79 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUM?VIAR Y - CITY A TTORNEY CITY ATTORNEY Peter M. Thorson CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER Shawn D. Nelson (Acting) 80 C~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY ATTORNEY Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Oufia~ Total Actual FY 1996-97 462,479 402,479 Funding Source: Actual FY 1997-98 286,034 $ 286,034 $ Budgeted FY 1998-99 400,000 400,000 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 347,500 S 347,500 81 CiO2 of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- CITY ATTORNEY Program: City Attorney MISSION: The City Attorney serves as legal advisor to the City Council, City Manager, and the various City depamnents, commissions, committees, and boards. The City Attorney prepares and approves for legality the.majority of proposed 'City ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and other legal documents. The City Attorney also represents the City in all litigation. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE SOUND LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY STAFF, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS ON ALL .MATTERS CONCERNING THE CITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF CITY POLICY. Render legal advice on all City.matters to Council and staff in a manner that permits timely and appropriate action. Review and advise staff in a timely manner on court decisions and new laws that affect City operations. Advise and represent the City on litigation matters in a complete and timely fashion. Review all ordinances, resolutions, contracts and agreements in a complete and timely manner. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Complete review of contracts and -agreements '-Complete review of all City ordinances and resolutions within 7 working days of submittal PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 97% 98% 98% 98% 95% 95% 95% 95% 82 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y - CITY CLERK CITY CI FRK/ DIP,. OF SLIPPORT SERVICES Susan W. Jones DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SLIPPORT SERVICES Michaela Ballreich CITY CLERK SUPPORT SERVICES -- Council Support -- Elections -- Legislative History -- Public Information -- Records Management -- Copy Center/Mail Room/ Receiving -- Information Systems -- Reception Services 83 City of Temecuhi DEPARTMENT SUMMARY - CITY CLERK Exnendimre Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996=97 $ 295,636 $ 214,299 $ 509,935 $ Funding Source: Actual FY 1997-98 Budgeted FY1998-99 $ 406,650 211,131 305,580 192,462 1,723 499,765 $ 617,781 GeneralFund Proposed FY1999.00 $ 367,640 253,120 $ 620,760 Personnel Allocation City Clerk/Director of Support Services Deputy Director of Support Services Records Coordinator Administrative Secretary Office Specialist Office Assistant Department Total Authorized 1998-99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 84 CiO~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT S~It -CITY CK.F. RK Pro[ram: City Clerk MISSION: The City Clerk is responsible for compiling and maintaining official City records. This program keeps records readfly accessible to all; this program conducts fair and impartial municipal elections; prepares, certifies, and/or adheres to public notice requirements with regard to legal documents, orditmnCcS, resolu~olls, public hearings, etc. This program codflies and disseminates the City's Municipal Code, promotes public awareness of the processes of government; provides meeting, ~mini~aflve, and legislative support to the Mayor, City Councilmembers, and its Commitions and Committees. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Expanded Minute Clerk services · Converted minutes into a uniform format · Developed a Commtinity Cale~ldar · Expanded Notary services to staff and the public GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: COMPLETE SCANNING Olr ~,LL CITY COUNCIL AND COMMISSION AGENDA PACKETS INTO THE LASERFICHg AND PROVIDE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF ALL CITY RECORDS IN EASILY~ ACCESSIBLE Complete document imaging of all City Council and Commission agenda packets since incorporation. Contirade sc3nning of all agenda, minutes, resolutions and ordinances as adopted. Ensure e3sy accessibility of records to City staff as well as the public. Revise the City's retention, schedule for City records to assist all departments in identifying and propcdy coding all documents for retention. EVIPLEMENT A COIVI~ OUTREACH PROGRANL Work with the school district to distribute voter regisWation material to all high school seniors turning 18 years ol& Hold a voter registration drive to encourage participation in City elections. Develop educational materials in the form of brochures, fiyers, and on the Web page, explaining the workings of the City Clerk's office and assisting citizens in working with their local government Maintain and expand the Link Program, which primarily assists senior citizens with their various needs. Provide information on community evens and City events on the local cable television channel to be broadcast during intermission at the City Council meetings. 85 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUA,IMARY- CITY CLERK Program: City C!er~ (Continued) GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY STAFF, AND THE COMMUNITY REGARDING THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF CITY DOCUMENTS. Prepare and distribute agencla packets to the City Council at least 72 hours prior to all meetings. R~corcl, ~be, atid ~tmliTe !neering Inim~es 'in a timely manner for City Council, Temecula Community Sen, ices District, Redevelopment Agency, Planning CommiSSiOn, PBblic. ffr'af~c Safety Commission, Old Ton Redevelopment Advisory Committee and the Old Town Local Review Board. Provide timely processing af ordinances and resolutions within one week of adoption Process contracts and agreements within ten (10) days of City Council action. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Avenge time for disWibution of Council packets before meetings Avenge time to finalize meeting minutes Avenge processing of ordinances and resolutions from time of adoption · Average processing af contracts from time 'of City Council action Number of citizen voter registrations obtained PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 Fir 1998/99 FY 1999/00 96 hours 96 hours 96 hours 96 hours 2 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks 6 days 6 days 6 days 6 days 8 days 8 days 8 days 8 days 100 50 75 100 CiO/ of Temecula DEPARTA/I~NT S~RY - CITY C~F~K Program: Support Services MESION: The Support Services Division p~o~ides internal support rumions at City Hall and other City facih'ties. These functions include the Copy Center, Mail Room, Receivin~ Main Reception, Main Switchboard and Information Systems services. 19~g-~9 ACCOMPLISHlV!ElqTS: · Completed and distributed a written InformSion Systems Manual to all employees · Provided all City Council members with laptop computers and E-n~ii to allow better communication with concerned citizens and staff members · Redesigned the City's Web page, adding infornm. on helpful to the citizens of Temecula, such as City Council Agendas, City Couzilmember E-nmil addresses, the City' s Municipal Code and information reganting each City department · Converted to Windows 95 and the Microsoff Office Professional application and trained all City staff, mnidng lhe transition as smooth as possible · Replaced the City's telecommunications system at the CRC to ensure Y2K compliance · Tested and axe continuing to test systems at the City to assure Y2K compliance · Expanded the lobby _reception services to better serve the public GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: ENSURE THAT CITY SYSTEMS ARE Y2K COMPLIANT AND CONTINGENCY PLANS ARE IN PLACE. Replace older equipment as scheduled to meet Y2K compfiance. Continue testing network and associated equipment EXPAND THE CITY'S WEB SITE, MAKING IT MORE INTERACTIVE WITH THE PUBHC AND ASSISTING THEM IN OBTAINING INFORMATION 24 HOURS A DAY. ' CONTINUE TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY LIVE BROADCASTS OF ALL REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, AND THE TAPING OF ALL COMMISSION MEETINGS. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of computers replaced Number of computer training days offe/ed per year Number of inforrrmtion systems requests responded to Number of black and white copies reproduced monthly Number of color copies reproduced monthly PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY1997/98 FY1997/98 FY1998/99 FY1999/00 35 35 34 109 43 43 47 25 1,700 1,700 1,800 2,000 300,000 296,619 300,000 350,000 50,000 28,665 30,000 35,000 87 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- FINANCE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Genie Roberts ASST. FINANCE DIRECTOR Tirn McDermott FINANCE OPERATIONS I FINANCE MANAGEMENT SENIOR MGMT ANALYST Gus Papagolos FINANCE SUPPORT SERVICES -- Accounts Payable -- Accounts Receivable -- Payroll -- General Ledger Maintenance -- Operating Budget -- Financial Reporting -- Cash & Investments -- Contract Administration -- Debt Financing -- Corrmunity Facilities District Administration -- Capital Improvemere Program Budget -- Risk Managemere -- Purchasing -- Business Licensing -- Cashiering -- Grant Adnfinistration 88 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMA4AR Y - FINANCE Expenditure Summan Personnel $ Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total $ Actual FY 1996-97 504,657 252,928 757.585 $ $ Funding Source: Actual FY 1997-98 Budgeted FY 1998-99 566,809 240,777 1,701 659,200 330,874 3,478 809,287 $ 993,552 GeneralFund Proposed FY 1999-O0 $ 687,430 323,510 $ 1,010,940 Personnel Allocation Director of Finance Assistant Finance Director Senior Management Analyst Senior Accountant Accountant Administrative Secretary Accounting Specialist Purchasing Specialist Accounting Assistant Department Total Authorized 1998-99 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 2.50 1.00 1.00 10.00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Proposed 1999200 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 2.50 1.00 2.00 11.00 89 Ci~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- FINANCE Finance Operations and Management MISSION: The Firmrice Operalions and Marmgeme~t Program is responsible for managing the City's responsib'~ilies include cash and investment management, financial reporting, preparation of the Annual Operating Budget, internal-audit, payroll, account payable, accounts receivable, flnnncial Oversight, arid adminiSWatiOll Of all City funds and ac~unts. Additionally, the department administers the public safety contracts of police and fire. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Received awards from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) and Govorammt Firerace Offloots Association (GFOA) for Excellence in Fireracial Reporting for the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report · Received awards from CSMFO and GFOA for excellence in operational budgeling forthe City's 1998-99 Annual Operating Budge~ · Receive! an unqualified audit opinion GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTWE: PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE AND METICULOUS GENERAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS TO ENSURE THIP~ CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTAINS A SOUND FINANCIAL CONDITION. Manage the City's investment portfolio with the safety of principal as the primary objective and remm on investmere as the secondary objective, wh~e maintaining liquidity to meet the City's obligations. Provide timely and accurate weekly chock runs for accounts payable and hi-weekly processing of payroll. Provide timely and accurate financial reports, including-the Comprehensive-Annual Financial. Report (CAFR) for the decision. makers and operating departments. Continue to prepare the City's CAFR, obtain an unqamli~ed audit opinion, and comply with the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) and Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) award criteria. PROVIDE A SOUND FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE CITY THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS. Prepare an Annual Operating Budget which complies with the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) and Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) award criteria. City of Temecula DEPARTA4~NT SUA4MARY- HNANCE Program: Finance Operations and Management (Continued) OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE CONTRACT COORDINATION AND OVERSIGHT OF THE CITY'S POLICE AND FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY. Negotiate annual service conWarn that provide the City with the highest level of services at the best possible cost. Ensure that police staffing meets the City' s goal of one ( 1 ) officer per 1,000 citi~ns. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Percentage of bank reconcffiations performed before the close of the subsequent month Invoices processed per year Number of payroll checks/direct deposits processed per year Number of CSMFO and GFOA award winning CAFR documents prepared (with unqualffied opinions) Number of management letter comments as a result of City's annual audit Number of CSMFO and GFOA award. winning operating budgets prepared PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999100 100% 100% 100% 100% 10,823 11,900 13,200 14,500 3,900 4,400 4,700 5,500 I 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 91 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUAtMARY - HNANCE Program: F'mance Support Services MISSION: The Finnrice Support Services Program is responsible for preparation of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget document, risk mnnnScmcnt, purcha-~ing, business licensing, grant administration, and other Finnrice Support x~lated projects. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Received the award for excellence in capital budgeting from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers for the 1999-2003 Capital Improvement Program budget · Reduced the City's annual properly and liability insurance premium costs by $36,000 while increasing insurance limits at the same time · Implemented a revised insurance standard for businesses wanting to do business with the City · Reduced claims administration costs due to efficient internal review of claims · Administered 158 reimbursements totaling over $440,000 to property owners in CFD 88-12. The reimbursements were issued 45 days sooner than in previous years. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: o mcmmv si GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY THROUGH THE CIP BUDGET PROCESS. Prepare a Capital Improvement Program budget document in accordance with the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers award criteria. Work collaboralively with each department individually and in workshops to ensure completeness and consistency throughout the CIP process in accordance with City Council direction. .. MINIMIZE CITY LIABILITY THROUGH THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Conduct quarte~y field inspections of right-of-way and parks with the insurance carrier's loss control adminisuator. Conduct a preliminary review of all risk management claims within 10 calendar days of receipt. Update the Risk Management Policy Manual and Safety Manual annually for use by City staff. ENSURE A CUSTOMER SERVICE ORIENTED PURCHASING OPERATION WHICH PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR ALL CITY PURCHASES. Process 90% of all purchase requests within 48 hours of receipt. Assist City Staff in the preparation and review of Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and Requests for Q~mli~ca~ons (RFQs). 92 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUA,BiARY- FINANCE Progrin: Finance Support Services (Continued) OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE BUSINESS LICENSE PROGRAM WHICH ENCOURAGES 100% PAR~CIPATION BY CITY BUSINESSES. Process 90°/~ of all flew !ic:e~e applic~ions within five working days. Process 95% of all business license renewals by February 28th each year. Identify all businesses r~luiring licenses and ensure they become licensed within onc month of identificalion. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of business licenses issued Percentage of business license applications processed within 5 working days Percent of business license renewals processed by February 28th Number of purchase orders processed Percent of purchase orders processed within 48 hours of receipt Percent of claims processed within 10 days of receipt PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 3,900 4,500 5,300 5,900 90% 95% 95% 95% 90% 90% 95% 95% 2,200 2,600 3,300 4,000 90°~ 95% 95% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100°,4 93 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I PLANNING MANAGER Dcbbi~ Ubnosk¢ I I I CURRENT ] ADVANCE PLANNING PLANNING DEPUTY CITY MANAGER. Cmy Thornhill I I CHEF BUILDINO OFFICIAL Tony Elm I I I BUILDING ] CODE SERVICES ENFORCEMENT LAD DEVELOPMENT/ ENGINEERING -- Dcvclopmcnt Rgvicw -- Public Information -- Oemral Plan -- Ordinam:¢ Developright -- C,¢og, raphic Information Systems ((]IS) -- CEQA Management -- Building & Services -- Plan Check Processing -- Putnit Issuance -- Sign Abatcngnt -- Abandoned Vehicle -- Zoning Violation -- Substandard Living -- Public Nuisance -- Pcrmit Issuance -- Permits -- Plan Cheeks -- Map Reeordation -- Ekvclopment Inspection -- Plan Review 94 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Program: Planning Expenditure Summary Funding Source: General Fund Actual Actu ai B u d gete d P ropo sed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Personnel $ 685,464 Operations'& Maintenance 279,037 Capital Outlay 869,209 $ 1,027,220 409,572 650.549 2,797 79,794 1,281.578 $ 1,757.563 Total $ 964.501 $ $ 1,176,770 555,370 24,000 $ 1.756.140 Program: Building and Safety Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Funding Source: General Fund Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 597,319 $ 428,295 632,845 $ 860,650 479,125 532,559 780 6,750 $ 1,112,750 $ 1399,959 $ 1.025.614 $ 1,216,650 590,440 9,950 $ 1.817.040 Program: Land Development/Engineering Expenditure Summary. Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Funding Source: General Fund Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 592,251 155.583 682,381 $ 779,370 143,757 224,350 302 2,510 826,440 $ 1,066,230 747.834 $ 773,260 226,060 . 2,500 $ 1.001,820 95 Cily of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEFELOPMENT Personnel Allocation Authorized 1998-99 PLANNING Deputy City Manager Planning Manager Senior Planner Associate Planner Development Processing Coordinator GIS ,Analyst Assistant Planner Community Development Technician Administrative Secretary Community Development Aide Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 12.00 BUILDING & SAFETY Chief Building Offiicial Deputy Building Offficial Senior Building Inspector Plan Checker / Building Inspector Building Inspector II Code Enforcement Offiicer Community Development Technician Building Inspector I Adtninistrativ.e Sec~tary Office Specialist. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 11..00 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 (2.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00- 5.00 Proposed 1999-00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.00 96 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Personnel Allocation Authorized 1998-99 LAND DEVELOPMENT Director of Public Works/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Director Senior Engineer Associate Engineer Permit Engineer Senior Public Works Inspector Assistant Engineer Public Works Inspector Community Development Technician Administrative Secretary Office Assistant 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.75 Total 10.60 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1.00) 0.00 0.25 (0.75) Proposed 1999-00 0.30 ' 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.25 1.00 9.85 97 City of Temecula DEPARTA4~NT SUA4MARY- COMMUNITY DEFELOPAfENT Program: Current Planning MISSION: The Current Planning Program provides a variety of planning services to the commullity, including reviewing and processing of development proposals for conformance with City 'policies and regulations, and implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act Staff provides support to the PlanninE Commission and City Council, and assists'the general public and development applicants regarding planning information and application processing. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Approv~d up to 75,000 squar~ feet of development on the perimeter of the Promenade Mall · Held Planning Commission Workshops for the Ro~paugh Ranch Specific Plan (2,058 units on 788 acres) · Approved a 133,000 square foot manufacUl~ng/distribution facility for Milgard Manufacturing on 7.5 acres · .Approv~d a 129,462 square foot Low~s retail home improvement facility on 17.52 OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE FOR THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATIONS WITHIN ESTABLISHED TIMELINES. Utilive pre-opplication meetings to streamline the development review process. Utilize the "fast track" process for all projects meeting the "fast track" criteria. Schedule 90% of non-controversial public hearing cases before the Planning Commission one to two weeks after the application is deemed complete. Schedule 75% of Planning Director hearing cases one to two weeks after 'the' application is deemed complete. Schedule 80% of public hearing cases before the City Council four weeks after the project is heard by the Planning Commission Schedule 100% of "fast Irack" cases before the Planning Commission the same day the application is deemed complete. Allow for concurrent processing of grading and building plans once an application is deemed complete for all "fast track" projects. 98 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Program: Current Planning (Continued) GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE QUALITY CUSTOMER SERVICE. Respond to all calls received within 24 hours. Schedule meeiings with applicants within two to four days after the initial request Acknowledge customers needing assistance at the front counter within two minutes of their arrival. Assist all customers needing assistance at the front counter within 20 minutes after they are acknowledged. Provide routine infonnation requested by customers at the public information counter the same working day the request is taken; Provide researched information requested by customers at the public information counter within three working days from the date the request was taken. Utilize the Development Processing Coordinator to facilitate small business development, temporary use permits and special projects of the Division. Develop new and refine existing handbooks, brochures and handouts that explain the various development review processes. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of public' hearing cases submitted Number of pre-application meetings scheduled Number of "fast track" projects PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 60 71 88 90 45 21' 22 22 4 2 5 5 99 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY - COMMUNITY DEI/ELOP~ Program: Advance Planning &Specid Projects MISSION: The Advance Planning and Special Projects Program is responsible for a variety of long- range phnning issues affe~ing the COmmlmity, including implementation and mnin~el]ilCe of the Cityzs Gea~al plsm~ prepalation of special land iise stmties of cOnCern tO the City, and malntelmnoe of vital demographi~ and physical informalion data. This program provides support servi~s to other departments/agencies, monitors various Coundl dire~on. The purpose ~f the General Plan is to provide long-term vision and ~onsistency for locsl development snd infraslns~ure progrnm~. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Adopted the final adult business ordinance Adopted a citywide recreational Vehicle parking ordinance Completed the environmental review for the following capital projects: Maintenance of the Rancho California Sports Park De~ilting Basin Butterfield Stage Park Improvements TVHS Tennis Court Lighting Winchester Road M~dian and Street Light Improvements Santa Gsrtrudis Biks Trail Undercrosshag OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: ENSURE CTrY INTERESTS ARE REPRESENTED ON VARIOUS REGIONAL AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES. Continue to participate in various regional planning activities such as the Margarita River Watershed Management Program, the Western County Multi-Species planning effort, and area-wide Uansporta~on planning. Coordimte all projects and eftoRs with the County of Riverside, City of Murrieta, Southern California Association of Governments, Western Riverside Council of Govemmems, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and various regional utility agencies. CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT THE C1TY'S ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE lAW. ~. Prepare the Annual General Plan Implementation Report. ~. Develop a locally appropriate growth management program to address local needs. UPDATE PORTIONS OF THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN TO ENSURE THAT THE PLAN CONTINUES TO PROVIDE ACCURATE GUIDANCE AND DIRECTION FOR LOCAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAW. Update the Housing Element to ensure the provision for. adequate housing opportunities in conjunction with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment Progtm~ Complete the process of updating the Circulation Element and lhe General Plan Traffic Model. 100 City of Temecula DEPARTA4~NT SU34MARY- COA,tMUNHT DEVELOPMENT ProB~un: Advance planning (Continued) OBJECTIVES: GOAL 5: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 6: 4. Ulxlate the Land Use, Noise and Air Quality Elements, as needed, after the adoption of the updated Circulation Elm UNDERTAKE SPECIAL STUDIES, AS DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL, TO ACTIVELY PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE AND SATISFY THE COMMUNITY'S SPECIAL PLANNING NEEDS. Work with local lxopeny owners to develop and adopt a Southside Specffic Plan to address changing ~ along the From Street corridor, south af Old Town, and to support the City' s ongoing improve~nt and revitalization efforts in this arex Initiate a City Ilall Master Plan Study to proactively address the' City's long-term space and community facility needs. Undertake additional special planning studies, pmgramg~ ordinances, and special date/analysis requests, as needed. UpSfade the phnning Division's Wcb page to provide usable and accurate information to the pubtic. CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS FOR CTIT PROJECTS. J, Work with the Community Sen4ces and Pubtic Works departments to ensure compfiance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the timely approval of all City projects. CREATE A USEFUL AND FUNCTIONAL GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GB). 4, Finali~e the initial set up of the basic data layers and complete the initial stuff training activities to be able to fully use the City's new system. .~ Ensure that all data layers have the most accurate and usable information possible. ,0, Acquire and set up the Map Objects program and train City staff in the use of the program to use the GIS database to create rasps and exhibits. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Percent of regional planning meeting attended PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 199798 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 N/A N/A N/A 80% 101 CRy of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUA4?vLARY- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Program: Building Services MISSION: The Building Services Program is responsible for enforcing the City's Building and Safety codes; performing plan checks on construction documentation to ensure that project proposals meet City codes; distributing plans for review by other agencies or City depamnents; issuing building permits after plans are completed and corrected; completing final inspections; and issuing certificates of occupancy. The program also performs special inspections; implements certain state laws such as the California Disabled Access Regulations; is responsible for updating Building and Fire codes required by the State of California (including local amendments); provides guidance to the general public and development community regarding the Uniform Building Codes and project applications; and is responsible for inspections of private development projects, construction within the public right-of-way exclusive of capital projects, and erosion control cnforcemenL 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCALLY MANDATED BUILDING RELATED CODES FOR ALL NEW AND REMODEL PERMIT APPLICATIONS. · :, Provide initial plan review comments and conditions within 12 working days from the date of submittal. · :- Provide complete plan review at the front counter on minor, non-structural permit applications. o:o Provide a re-review of initial comments and conditions in a 5 to 7 working day period. ENSURE 'THE TIMELY ISSUANCE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION RELATED PERMITS. · :, Fully utilize the City's permit issuance and tracking computer software in the processing and issuance of building related permits. · :, Maintain an efficient departmental communication network for obtaining final approval for building permit issuance. PERFORM BUILDING INSPECTIONS IN AN EFFICIENT AND TIMELY MANNER FOR ALL TYPES OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY. · :- Respond to inspection requests within 24 hours of receipt. · :, Perform approximately 30,000 combination inspections on building related permits. 102 CiO~ of Temecula DEPARTA~NT SUJt~t~IRY- COb~IUArITY DEVELOPt~EIVT Program: Building Service~ (Continued) GOAL 4: OBJECTIVES: 4, Protect the public safety through inspccflm of various stages of construction for all buildings within the City. State and local requirements. PROVIDE RESPONSIVE ASSISTANCE TO THE PUBLIC. Provide construction related information to the public as an "over the coLmUir" service. Ensure inspectors have time allocated to respond to customer questions. Provide informational site inspections to homeowners performing home projects. Mainlain an adequate inventory of current consmwtion standard handouts and ,current code documents for public review. Conduct biannual workshops for active developers within the City. Address customer concerns and complaints within three (3) days of receipt PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Percent of initial plan reviews within 12 working days Percent of residential plan re-review within 5-7 working days Percent of commercial plan re-review within 7-10 working days Number of building related permits issued Percent of combination building inspections performed within 24 hours Number of combination building inspections performed Number of Certificates of Occupancy inspeclions t~onned Number of workshops provided for active developers within the City PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 100% 100~/~ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% N/A '100% 100% 100% 2,200 1,058 1,052 1,400 100% 100% 100% 100% 30,000 26,149 26,500 30,000 100 109 175 300 2 2 3 3 103 Cit~ of Temecula DEPARTA/II~NT SUMM,4RY- COA,IMUNIlT DEVELOPMENT Program: Code Enforcement MISSION: The Code Enforcement Program is responsible for nmn~ing, ~ plnnning, and coordiming all code enforcement activities for th~ Cits/, and for making administrative decisions and interpretrations regarding inconsfi.~cencies or conflicts related to various ordinances and regulations on behalf of.the City. This program plays a vital role'in assisting the City Attorney in land use matters by providing documentation, photographs, and witnesses. The Code Enforcement Officer coordinates related enforcement activities with other City and County agencies, departments, and groups; preparcs coErcsl~ndcncc and reports on sensitive cases; and nmint~inn standard workload measures. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Completed an effective comprehensive Temporary Sign Abatement Program · Participated in the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program · Participated as an integral part of Temecula One · Certified Code Enforcement staff through the Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officers · Established vector control information program for rat infeststim GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 3: GOAL 4: OBJECTIVES: ENSURE A SAFE, DECENT AND ATTRACTWE ENVIRONMENT FOR RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND VISITORS AND PRESERVE AND UPGRADE THE CITY'S HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. Maintain a three-day response time for addressing citizen-generated concerns on housing, health and safety, land use, public nuisance, animal control, and vector control matters. Contact complainants at t~e close of each case. PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE CITYWIDE WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM, 4. Manage the commencement of annul weed abatement activities Citywide by May 1 and complete program activities in a timely manner. ~. Monitor the completion of weed abatement activities and obtain City Council confirmation af abatement cost assessments for timely recording on the following year' s property tax rolls. PROVIDE RESPONSIVE ASSISTANCE TO THE PUBLIC 4. Ensure inspectors are allocated time to respond to public inquiries. ~. Ensure informalion on land use and code enforcement is available to the public. MAINTAIN A RESPONSIVE PROGRAM FOR CONTROL OF VECTOR NUISANCES. Provide resource information to public within 24 hours of receipt for all citizen colicern,qo 104 City of Temecula DEPARTAIENT SUA/1M_ARY- COAIMUNITY DEFELOPMENT Program: Code Enforcement (Continued) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of citizen-reported Code Enforcement concerns responded to within 3 working days Percent of complainants contacted at the close of cases Percent of weed abatement activities commenced by May 1 Percent of resource information made available to the public within 24 hours PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 PROJECTED FY 1999/00 1,704 1,825 1,500 1,500 100% 85% 95%' 100% 100% lOOe/~ 100% 100% 100% 100°~ 100°/~ 100% 105 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEFELOPMENT Program: Land Development/Engineering MISSION: The Land I)evclopmcnt/Engineering Program provides for the review and engineering approvals of all ptiva~ development Wishin the City to ensure compliance with the Subdivision lVlap Act, NPDES, City codeS., ordirmnccs and policies. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Reviewed, plan checked, and inspected major projects that included numerous residential subdivisions, the Promenade Mall, and other industrial and commercial projects PROPERLY ADMINISTER THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL MANDATES. OBJECTIVES: Ensure special design and construction projects are completed within specified time flames. GOAL 2: ~, Respond to other agency inquiries timely to resolve all issues. .0. Ensure construction compliance throughout the community on land development projects. PROVIDE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE AND EXCEPTIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE THROUGH COUNTER DUTY, TELEPHONE AND FIELD INSPECTIONS. OBJECTIVES: Ensure that all inquiries and inspections are satisfactorily completed in a helpful and cxpeclitious manner. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: First plan check turnaround time Subsequent plan checks turnaround time Map changes turnaround time Development Review ramaround time Use Permits ramaround lime PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 3 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks' within 2 weeks within 2 weeks within 2 weeks within 2 weeks 4g hours 4g hours 48 hours 48 hours 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks within 7 days within 7 days within 7 days within 7 days 106 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF · PUBLIC WDRKS/ CITY ENGINEER Bill Hughes (Acting) DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS -- RonParks I I I TRAFFIC ADMINISTRATION/ MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIAL PROJECTS I CAPITAL PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION I LAND DEVELOPMENT/ ENGINEERING* -- Pavement -- Traffic -- City/Council Mamgement Commi ssion Coordi mting -- Signing/Swiping -- Traffic Census Committees -- Tree Trimming -- Traffic Device -- FEMA Projects/ -- Weed Aba,,-mcnt Inventory Floodplain -- Draimge Channels -- Speed Surveys Administration -- Special Events -- Traffic Signal -- Non-CIP -- Graffiti Removal Maintenance Design Projects -- Contract -- Traffic Signal -- Assessrr~nt Administration Timing Districts -- Public Service -- Traffic Analysis -- Development Requests Investigation Review -- Public Service -- Other ASency Requests Review -- Project Development -- GrantApplication -- Hans & Specifications -- Requests for Proposals/ Public Bidding -- Conslruction Mgrat -- Construction Inspection -- Permits -- Plan Che~ks -- Map Re~ordation -- Development Impection *The budget for this program is reflected in Community Development 107 C~ o./' Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y - PUBLIC WORKS Exl~enditurc Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Funding Source: General Fund Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 449,797 1,266,390 33,814 575,565 $ 816,590 1,249,700 1,907,943 46,927 22,586 1,872,192 $ 2,747,119 $ 1,750,001 $ $ 964,370 1,969,670 21,100 $ 2,955,140 Program: CIP Administration Exl}cnditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Personnel Allocation Public Works Director of Pubiic Works/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Director Senior Engineer Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer Senior Management Analyst Management Analyst Landscape Inspector Administrative Secretary Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Total Funding Source: Actual Actual Budgeted FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 $ 510,159 $ 88,564 $ 598,723 $ 455,067 $ 800,260 98,023 194,800 9,410 553,090 $ 1,004.470 Authorized 1998-99 Changes General Fund Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 1,365,390 186,130 1,500 $ 1.553,020 Proposed 1999-00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.40 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 · 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0o00 0.50 0.50 0.50 (0.50) 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.50 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 1.50 0.25 1.75 12.30 2.50 14.80 108 Ci0' of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- PUBLIC WORKS Personnel Allocation CIP Administration Director of Public Works/City Engineei Deputy Public Works Director Senior Engineer Associate Engineer Senior Public Works Inspector Assistant Engineer Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Office Assistant Total Authorized 1998-99 0.30 0.30 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 11.60 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 (0.50) 0.00 Proposed 1999-00 0.30 0.30 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 0.50 0.25 0.25 11.60 109 Ci(y of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMTvflRY- PUBLIC WORKS Program: Maintenance MISSION: The Maintenance Program is responsible for all maintenance activities associated with the City's streets, drainage facilities, tnffic control devices, street trees and parkways, grafliti removal, weal abatement, street' stenciling/striping, Pavement Management System, slum/seal program, pethole patching, service order requests, afterhour call-oUts, emergency respense, and special events suppert. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Maintained excellent safety record · Implemented pethole patching program · Installed new Old Town holiday wreaths · Supperted capital improvement project and traffic immediate congestion relief projects GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR THE COMMUNITY. · :.Respond to all service order requests within a 24-hour peried. · :.Ensure service requests requiting emergency repairs are completed within 48-hours. · :.Remove graffiti within 24-hours. · :- Implement a Pavement Management System, which addresses a minimum of 85% of all pavement projects. · :. Restencil and inventory stencils Citywide routinely, and record restencil legends 'monthly.' PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of service order respenses Number of legends stenciled Number of trees maintained Number of special events suppened PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 400 336 426 600 2,500 2,228 3,628 3,700 N/A N/A 1,464 1,500 N/A N/A 9 10 110 Ci~ of Temecula DEP/~RTILIKNT $UA4MARY- PUBLIC WORKS Program: Traffic · MISSION: The Traffic Engineering Program provides st~ff for the Public Traffic/Safety Commission aud is responsible for the collection aud analysis of traffic volumes, accident reports, speed studies, and Waffic device inventories. This program is also responsible for m~intenance and timing of all existing W~ffic signals, along with establi.~hing future traffi~ sL~n~l pflorifles. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Updated the Citywide annual volume counts and signal priority list · Completed installation of three traffic signals · lmplemeated the Citywide Intelligent Traffic Management System, which interconnects approximately 30 traffic signals. This system mables these signals to · Reviewed numerous traffic i.mpsct studies, traffi~ signal plans, signing and striping plans, traffic control plans and other improvemeat plans for private end commercial development projects. Responded to traffic complaints · Developed and implemented a program of Category I circulation projects (quick fix projects) to address congestion problems and prepare for mall-related traffic OBJECTIVES: ENSURE OPTIMAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY THROUGH PROPER MAINTENANCE OF STREETS AND SIGNALS, AND MONITORING OF CONDITIONS TO IDENTIFY AREAS OF CONCERN. Conduct timely investigations of traffic incidents to identify potential preventive maintenance which could reduce occurrences. Maintain the Citevide Waffic. census program to account for aH signals and to ensure all signals are ~ proper working order. Provide ongoing reviews of traffic conditions at major intersections to ensure optimal circula~o~ Review all construction plans timely to improve City traffic circulatio~ GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: PROACTIVELY MITIGATE AND HEAD OFF POTENTIAL TRAFFIC CONGESTION PROBLEMS. ~. E.nlmuce the responsiveness to traffic congestion problems. Monitor the City's intersections during peak hours and respond to congestion issues in a timely manner in cooperation wi{h CalTrans. Aggressively review and monitor development activities, construction, utility activities and special events to ensure that adequate traffic and access are accomplishecL Enhance the responsiveness to traffic congestion problem. 111 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT ,,~UA,t3&4RY- PUBLIC WORKS Program: Traffic Engineering PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Avenge number of days to compleU~ traffic investigations Percent of traffic signal timing reviews per year Average number of days to complete plan reviews PROXECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 PROJECTED FY 1999100 25 15 15 15 100% 100% 100% 100% 14 14 14 14 112 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUA4MARY- PUBLIC WORKS Program: Administration and Special Projects MISSION: The Admini-~FdtiOn and Special Projects Program is responsible for providing coordination with other agencies and organizations involved in transportalion, flood control, unitmy sewer, and water distribution This Division represents the City at technical advisory commiV/ee meefln~ involving the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Western Riverside Council of Governments in issues concerning federal funding air ~mlity, and congestion management Additionally, the Division is involved in the Water Planning Task Force; the various Santa Margarita Watershed groups; and the Joint Temecula/I~m~ieta Traf~c Committee. The Administration Division also tracks division budgets, and coordinates all programs within the Public Works Depamnent. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Obtained a federal grant of $810,000 for the rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road west of Jefferson Aveaue. GOAL l: PROVIDE A CENTRALIzgD SUPPORT CENTER TO ENSURE THE EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF ALL PUBLIC WORKS FUNCTIONS. OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: Ensure all Public Works divisions comply with the adopted annual operating budget by wacking all purchase orders and expenditure reports. Process timely requests for information and/or Public Works inquiries within 72 hours. MAINTAIN ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL GROUPS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES. Attend monthly Riverside County Transportation Technical Advisory Committee and Western Regional Council of Governments Technical Advisory Committee to ensure participation in all federal grant programs. Coordinate with the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) in the administration of RTIP funding for Public Works pmjeas. Communicate with federal agencies to ensure conformance with federally mandated regional policies. 113 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- PUBLIC WORKS Program: Capital Improvement Program Administration MISSION: The Capital Imp~o~ment ProSram Administration and Construction Mnn~Eement Program is responsible for preparing aequem for Proposals to secure prdessional services for design and constructim~ of public works and park projects. This division also reviews and ~}proves all consultant plan~; conducts the public bidding process; and performs construction inspection. The Master phnning and Conceptual Design of aH City parks is directed through the Temecula Community Sentices District and transferred to the Capital Projects Program for plymarion of the plans and specifications, and for. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Coordinated the plan, design and construction d more than 45 projects, which included: Pah Road Bridge, 1-15/hncho California Road Interchange, 1-15/ Overland Drive Overcrossing, Old Town Streetscape project, Mall perimeter improvements, Winchester southbound off-ramp wideaing Phase I, Front Street widenine and several park inm, rovements. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE TIMELY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CIRCULATION, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PARK PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY'S ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Upchte the Capital Improvement Program annually, including a comprehensive review of projects; initial cost estimates based on available and projected revenues; project timeliness; and project prioritiza~on. Design and construct proposed projects within funding and lime guidelines as set forth in the Capital Improvement Program document. PROVIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FROM PREPARING REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS TO CONTRACT CLOSEOUT. .~. Ensure timely and thorough preparation af Requests for Proposals. ~. Ensure compliance with all requirements of the public bidding process. 4. Provide timely review of plans and specifications. ~. Maintain communication with all parties involved in Public Works projects. .~. Provide timely and thorough inspeaions of constmaion projects. 114 City of Temecula DEP/LRTA~NT S~Y- PUBLIC WORKS Program: Capital Improvement Program Administration GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 4: OBJECTIVES: MINI]WIZF- CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON MOTORISTS. ~ Impro~ citizen satisfaction wi~h constrU~on impacts. Provide accurate and timel3t coordination while developing and implemenling the City's Capital Improvement Program~ INCREASE CHARGEABLE HOURS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO PROPERLY REFLECT ACTUAL STAFFING RESOURCES Provide accurate and timely accounting on resomc~ while implementing the City's Capital Improvement Proy-anL PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Total capital project costs incurred Percent of projects completed on schedule Percent of projects completed within budget Percent of completed Iwoject budget expended for project management PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998199 FY 1999100 $10,000,000 $10,266,000 $30,000,000 $47,377,000 90% 85% 95% 95% N/A 90% 90% 95% N/A 8.0% 9.5% 8.0% 115 City of Temecula DEPARTA4ENT SUA4MARY- POLICE POLICE CHIEF Pet~ Labaim POLICE LmUTENANT Janus Domeme I Invcstigativc Services ' [ Special Teams -- Investigations -- ~ Prevention Unit -- School Resource Unit -- POP Tearm/Satfilit~ -- Special Enforcc'nn~ Team I POLICE LIEUTENANT Scott Bates Patrol Services -- Conmmity Service -- K-9 Unit -- Traffic Enforcen~t~ -- Special Event Hami~ 116 C~t~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY - POLICE Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Ou~ay Total Funding Source: General Fund Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY' 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 4,38~,095 116,615 ' 9,977 $ 45,671 4,946,479 5,623,183 32,808 9,000 4,989,264 $ 5,677,854 4,501,710 $ 23,730 6,300,450 9,000 $ 6,333,180 117 City of Temecula DEP~RTMEN'I' SUMMARY- POLICE Program: Police Administration MISSION: The City contram with the Riverside County Sheriffs Deparunent for police services. The Police AdminisU~on Program is responsible for providing leadership, direction, and general stlmini~lralivc support necessa~. for effective and efficient hw enforcement The program also includes budget coordination and m~n~gement, personnel nnd payroll a~miniSirafiOn, plannin_,~, organizatioBal development, and community support. Additionally, this program ensures cooperation between the Police Department and the City Manager, other deportments, and City Council. The Police Administration Program is also responsible for overseeing vo|,nteer support ser~ces, with an emphasis on office and logistics support 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Continued Crime Free Multi-Housing Program. Fourteen of 23 existing complexes are certified in this f~__erally sponsored program. · Implemmted the Old Town Homeless Program. Initially 25 homeless individuals were identified in the Old Town business district. All individuals were assisted by this multiple agency proSram, and have been relocated into homes or other assistnnce proSrams. · Continued Temecula Affnin~t Graffiti Pro~ram (TAG). This pro~ctive surveillance program, utilizing citizen volunteers and reserve officers, contributed to a 49% decline in graf~ti removal costs in 1998. · Continued Quarterly Alcohol and Tobacco Juvenile Decoy Programs. This proactive program enforces illegal off-road laws in areas with persistent calls for service. · Continued the Quaaerly Trash-Busters Cleanup Program. This cooperative multi- agency program addresses the illegal dumping Of trash in and around the City of Temecula. · Implemented the Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Team (JOLT). This program includes the Temecula youth court for diversion of first time offenders, Juvenile Probation sweeps, which provide home checks of probationers, and the JOLT truant program, which is a joint effort by the TVUSD, Juvenile Probation and the District Attomey's Office. · Implemented the Campus Narcotic Suppression Program with the Canine Unit. This program involved canine presentations, random after-hour canine searches of .all campuses, and random parking lot searches of the high school campuses. · Continued operation of Enforce Responsible Alcohol Consumption In Temecula (ERAC1T). Monthly DUI checkpoints were conducted utilizing the Traffic and Special Team personnel. · Established the Professional Officer Exchange Program with the Police Department of Temecula's Sister City, Voorburg, The Netherlands. 118 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SU34M.~RY- POLICE PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT TO ENSURE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMECUIA'S RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVES: Provide Poli~e Depat~u~nt rep/v~liai-'on at ~ meetings. Ensure officer compliance with P.O.S.T. mandated training. Conduct ongoing reczuitment of volunteers for the Polic~ Department to support administrative operations, logistics program. and to assist law enforcement personnel at community events. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of volunteers recruited POST Training Complianc~ Percent of City Council & TrafficJPublic Safety Commission meetings at which the Temecula Police Dept was represented PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 22 15 17 22 - N/A 85% 85% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 119 Ci~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- POLICE Pro~rmm: Patrol Services MISSION: The Patrol Services Program provides first rcspondcrs to law enforcement related public safety requests. Patrol Officers arc responsible for nmint~ining safety and order in the C0mmllBity. Patrol staff inchulcs general patrol, traffic, K-9, bicycle, traffic, and community service officers. Traffic-Enforcement/Education scrvi.ccs provide enforcement of traffic laws Imrmmnt to the California Vchiclc Code, investigate traffic collisions, and provide pubtic educatioa in the areas of bicycle and pedestrian safety. GOAL h OBIECTIVES: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE COMMUNITY. Consisten~y maintain a visible community law enforcement progrnm: Respond to calls for service in a timely manner. Enforce traffic laws to ensure pubtic safety. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of general patrol officer hours provided per day Avenge response time for Priority 1 service calls Average response time for Priority 2 service_ Calls · Number of DUI arrests Number of Crime Prevention work,~hops attended per year Number of residen~al security surveys conducted per year Number of business security surveys conducted per year Number of businesses visited per year Number of businesses visited per year for crime follow-up Number of news srticles prepared per year on the business watch program Number of hours dedicated to graffi~ prevention per year PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998199 PROJECTED FY 1999100 98.7 97.5 97.5 115 6.5 rain 6.1 rain 6.0 rain 6.0 rain 11.0 rain. 9.4 rain 10.0 rain 10.0 rain 175 156 190 200 20 20 25 30 24 9 7 20 50 23 12 25 300 146 240 300 40 54 77 100 12 12 12 12 180 258 250 300 120 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUA4MAR Y - FIRE I PREVENTION FIRE CHIEF Mike Brown EMERGENCY RESPONSE -- Fire Prevention -- Fire Education -- Public Relations -- P~mmv/ -- Investigation -- Fire Suppression -- En~rgency Medical Care -- Hazardous Materials 121 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY - FIRE Funding Source: General Fund Exoenditurc Summary Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98. FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay $ 3,202 $ 20,636- $ 38,190 $ 26,000 1,399,205 1,431,239 2,115,436 2,769,060 25,600 483 20,884 Total $ 1.428.007 $ 1,452,358 $ 2,174.510 $ 2,795,060 122 City of Temecula DEPARTA4ENT SUA4MARY - FIRE MISSION: Fire pt~-vention funOions is~lude information, education, law enforcement, and planning/engineeflng. This includes numerous school and community education programx, arson investigations and an'ests, lifc and fLre safcty inspections of commcr~al bn.~inesses, and plan c~ inspe~cms for all new constnvzflon and building improvements to cnsure life and fire safe environments for all citizens. 199899 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Add,~d tWO permanmt staff members to ~ccomm,~nta the increased workload occurring withh the City · Continued participation in the Public Oriented Policing (P.O. P.) Program · Purchased computer software to automate the fire and life safety inspection/fire permit program · Assumed responsibility for state-mort,bred lic.~nsed care facilities and school insp~tions within Ihe City limits · I~vdopezl a quantificatiou and ~lassificafion program for hazardous materials used, stored, and handled within comn~rcial and industrial buildings · Participated in over 230 planning cases · Participated in the Publi~ Safely Expo and other community events · Maintained a high percentage of acceptable turn around time for plan review OBJECTIVES: CONDUCT A FULL SERVICE, COMPREHENSIVE HRE PREVENTION PROGRAM WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO MAXEMIZE FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY FOR AlL RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. Educat~ ci~ of aH ages in proper life and f~e safety practices. Maximize the FRe and life safety environments in all commercial and industrial assembly buildings in the City by conducting in-depth and accurate inspections. Provide accurate and flm~y plan checks and field inspections on all new and remodeled consUmion projects. Support fast tra~ing projects. Review annual statistics to evaluate prevention program performance and gain insight on how to improve the progran~ PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of businesses inspe~ Number of plan checks Number of Fire Prevention Bureau inspections PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FIr 1997/98 Fit 1997/98 FIt 1998/99 Fir 1999/00 2,225 2,256 2,350 2,500 1,150 1,156 1,350 1,500 1,700 1,805 2,220 2,500 123 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- FIRE Program: Emergency Response MISSION: The Emergency Response Program is responsible for handling all fire, life, and environmental emergencies within five (5) minutes of receiving a call, utilizing highly trained and capable staff. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Opened Fire Station No. 83 as a cooperative effort with the Riverside County Fire Department · Upgraded 85 % of personnel to the status of Emergency Medical Technician 1 · Purchased and placed into service (3) additional AED units · Participated in the Public Safety Expo GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: TO GAIN THE COMMUNITY'S TRUST AND CONFIDENCE IN THE ABILITY TO QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY HANDLE ALL EMERGENCIES. · :.Respond to all emergencies within five (5) minutes. · :.Maintain aH emergency vehicles in top mechanical condition. · :. Ensure that all personnel are fully trained and certified at the highest current levels available. · :. Through pre-~re planning ensure that all personnel are aware of special hazards within their assigned response areas. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Average response time Number of business pre-fire plans prepared and updated PROJECTED FY 1997/98 4.5 N/A ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 4.25 4.6 '4.5 N/A 175 500 124 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- ~4NIMAL CONTROL Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 $ 35,699 $ $ 35.699 $ Funding Source: Actual ' FY 1997-98 39,900 $ Budgeted FY 1998-99 General Fund Proposed FY 1999-00 55,000 $ 55,000 39.900 $ 55.000 $ 55,000 125 CiO~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- ANIMAL CONTROL Program: Animal Control MISSION: The City of Temecula receives animal control services from Lake Elsinore Animal Friends (L.E.A.F.), a non-profit agency dedicated to fulfilling the animal control needs through contractual agreements. L.E.A.F. monitors dog licensing, patrols City neighborhoods, and ensures the safety of not 'only Temecula residents, but also animals found and detained from this area. GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE EFFECTIVE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMECULA RESIDENTS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CITY'S ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION. · :,Routinely patrol Temecula neighborhoods to ensure that animals are properly contained within property boundaries. · :- Respond to citizen complains regarding barking, dangerous, or vicious dogs. · :-Monitor the City's dog licensing program to ensure that initial licenses and renewals are processed timely. · :. Conduct "licensing sweeps" at least hi-annually. · :. Provide a safe and clean shelter facility for detained animals. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of new licenses issued Number of hcense renewals issued PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 N/A N/A N/A 250 N/A N/A , N/A 3,500 126 Cily of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expenditure Summary Funding Source: General Fund Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Personnel Operations &Maintenance $ 880,972 Capital Outlay Operating Transfers Out 3,408.872 Total $ 4.289.844 $ 1,186,877 $ 1,470,020 $ 2,186,000 7,574,700 7,320,165 958~000 $ 8,761.577 $ 8.790.185 $ 3,144.000 MISSION: Program: Non-Departmental The NoraDepartmental Program is a cost center for general administrative expenditures such as sales tax reimbursements, the "Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula" ("REST") program and property tax administrative fees. 127 (I'his Page Intenlionally Left Blank) 128 City of Temecula DEP,4RTA4rENT SUMMAR Y- COMMUNITY SER VICES I RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Herman D. Parker I DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Phyllis Ruse I I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I MAINTENANCE SERVICES -- Youth & Adult Sports -- Special Events -- Volunteer & Cultural Services -- Teen & Recreational Services -- Senior & Human Services -- Park Acquisition -- Park Developmere -- Assessment Administration -- Development Review -- Solid Waste Admi ni stration -- Cable Television Franchi se Admi ni ~trati on -- Park Maintenance -- Median Maintenance -- Slope Maintenance -- Facility Maintenance 129 CiO~ o.]' Temecula DEPART2~ENT SUJ~'2~AR ¥- C02~I~NITF SERVICES Funding Source: PARKS AND RECREATION* Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 1,124,006 1,628,368 22,846 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 1,237,077 1,734, 118 2,759 Special Tax Benefit Assessments General Fund Budgeted FY 1999-98 1,467,120 $ 2,134,868 15,500 $ 2.775.220 $ 2.973.954 $ 3.617.488 $ Proposed FY 1999-00 1,578,870 2,219,280 28,500 3,826,650 SERVICE LEVEL A Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 2,678 194,303 196.981 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 2,776 208,890 $ 211.666 Budgeted FY 1999-98 $ 2,850 280,368 $ 283.218 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 2,890 295,500 $ 298,390 ,'.SERVICE LEVEL B Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenanc~ Capital Outlay Total $ Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY 1997-98 Budgeted FY 1999-98 6,839 $ 6,839 $ 7,430 280,124 292,816 343,410 $ 299.655 286.963 $ 350,840 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 335,700 $ 335,700 *Does not include operating transfers out. 130 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES SERVICE LEVEL C Expenditure Summary Actual FY 1996-97 Personnel $ 113,930 Operations and Maintenance 440,037 Capital Outlay Actual FY 1997-98 Budgeted FY 1999-98 Proposed FY 1999-00 92,441 $ 119,490 $ 114,420 435,837 503,718 515,680 Total $ 553.967 $ 528.278 $ 623,208 $ SERVICE LEVEL D Actual FY 1996-97 Actual FY 1997-98 Budgeted FY 1999-98 Expenditure Summary 630,100 Personnel $ 43,846 Operations and Maintenance 1,754, 111 Capital Outlay Proposed FY' 1999-00 39,736 $ 43,680 $ 27,440 2,080,080 2,234,010 2,321,520 Total $ 1.797.957 $ 2.119.816 $ 2.277.690 $ 2,34&960 SERVICE LEVEL R Expenditure Summary Personnel Operati0nsand Maintenance Capital Outlay Total DEBT SERVICE Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 $ 9,940 Actual FY 1997-98 $ · 20,931 $ 9.940 $ 20.931 Actual FY 1996-97 $ 501,600 $ 501.600 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 500,995 $ 500.995 Budgeted FY 1999-98 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 13,230 $ 17,160 $ 13.230 $ '17.160 Budgeted FY 1999-98 $ 501,980 $ $ 501.980 $ Proposed FY 1999-00 500,270 500.270 131 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y- COMMUNITY SERI/1CES Personnel Allocation PARKS AND RECREATION Director of Community Services Deputy Director of Community Services Maintenance Superintendent Development Services Administrator Recreation Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Development Services Analyst Senior Landscape Inspector Museum Services Manager Recreation Supervisor Administrative Secretary Recreation Coordinator Landscape Inspector Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Custodian Total Authorized 1998-99 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.75 1.00 0.95 0.00 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.10 1.00 16.90 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 (0.25) 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.50 0.50 0.20 0.00 2.55 Proposed 1999-00 ,1.00 1.00 0.70 0.80 1.00 0.70 0.20 0.50 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 0.25 1.50 1.50 2.30 1.00 19.45 SERVICE LEVEL A Dev~10pment .Services Analyst 0.05 0.00 0.05 SERVICE LEVEL B Development Services Analyst Office Assistant Total 0.10 0.05 0.15 (o. lo) (o.o5) (o.15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 132 Ci~ of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICE,~ Personnel Allocation Authorized 1998-99 Changes Proposed 1999-00 SERVICE LEVEL C Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Senior Landscape Inspector Development Services Analyst Landscape Inspector Office Assistant 0205 0.05 0.60 · 0.70 0.00 0.25 0.00 (0.05) (0.10) (0.10) 0.50 0.05 0,05 0.00 0.50 0.60 ' 0.50 0.30 Total 1.65 0.30 1.95 SERVICE LEVEL D Development Services Administrator Development Services Analyst Office Assistant 0.25 0.15 0.50 (0.05) 0.00 (0.40) 0.20 0.15 0.10 Total 0.90 (0.45) 0.45 Community Services Total 19.65 2.25 21.90 133 Ci.tv of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES Program: Recreation Services MISSION: The Recreation Services Program is responsible for providing a comprehensive, Citywide recreation program that meets the recreation and human service needs within the 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Developed and implemented a marketing plan for the Citywide volunteer program. · Increased the number of excursion opportunities offered to Temecula residents. · Developed and implemented a Citywide special events banner display program. GOAL l: INCREASE THE NUMBER OF STAFF TRAININGS OR WORKSHOP OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PROJECT EMPLOYEES. OBJECTIVE: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 3: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 4: OBJECTIVE: GOAL 5: OBJECTIVES: Increase the number of staff trainings or workshop opportunities by six (6). Training opportunities may include, but are not limited to, computer training, safety training, customer service training, etc. INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FAMILY ORIENTED PROGRAMS AT THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER. Increase the number of family oriented program opportunities at the Temecula Community Center by four (4). Programs may include, but are not limited to, Family Fun Nights, excursions, family barbecues, etc. EXPLORE POSSIBLE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AT THE PROMENADE MALL SCHEDULED TO OPEN NOVEMBER 1999. Determine the feasibility of providing City-sponsored recreation opportunities at the Promenade Mall site. Opportunities may include, but are not limited to, Stow Time for Kids, Musical Presentations, Art Exhibits, etc. IMPLEMENT THE "TEMECULA PRIDE" CAMPAIGN. Implement a comprehensive campaign that educates and encourages Temecula residents to respect, enjoy, and maintain their community. Special events, bumper stickers, special recognition awards are several suggested avenues for promotions. IMPLEMENT MUSEUM OPERATIONS AND SERVICES · :.Complete the fabrication and installation of exhibits and other interior amenities. · :.Hire a Museum Administrator. · :. Work with the Temecula Valley Museum to provide riocent services and operate the museum for a determined number of hours per week. · :. Provide museum tours for school field trips. 134 Ci~V of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMA~ARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES Program: Recreation Services (Continued) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Numbe~ of staff trainings or workshop opportunities for all project staff Number of family oriented programs at the Temecula Community Center Number of recreational opportunities at the future Promenade Mall Number of "Temecula Pride" campaign promotional materials PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997198 FY 1997198 FY 1998/99 PROJECTED FY 1999/00 4 4 4 10 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 2 4 135 City of Temecula DEPARTA/IENT SUA/1MARY- COA4MUNI'IT SERVICES Profirm: Development Services MISSION: The Do~lopmcnt Services Program is responsible for parksite acquisition and development, assessment engineering, development review, and solid waste and cable television franchise administration. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Began construction of the Margarita Community Park and Phase H of Temecula Duck Pond · Completed construction of Winchester Creek Park · Completed plans for the Ssata Gertrudis Creek Trail · Hired an employee, through the City Clerk's department, who will assist the division in a public education program, GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 2: OBJECTIVES: GOAL 3: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE AND BALANCED NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA. · g. Complete consUuction of a school ballfield lighting project. ~, Complete installation of new tot lot equipment and phy surface at Rancho California Sports Park. Complete the design for the Senior Center Expansion Project. Complete the constmaion of the basketball court at Butterfield Stage Park Condition development projects to provide parkland and recreational facilities that meet. City standards. IMPLEMENT A COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-USE TRAH,S MASTER PLAN. Develop a Multi-Use Trails Master Plan, Complete construction of Santa Gerttudis undewc~ossing at Winchester Road. · ~.Accept easements from ~he Metropolitan Water District and other agencies for Wail uses. IMPLEMENT THE TEMECULA LIBRARY MASTER PLAN. Identify and secure funding for the construction of the library facility. Complete the constmaion documents for the library, and bid the project. 136 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SU3a,IAR Y- COA,BfUNITY SER FICES Prok, rm: Deve~pmmt Servim (Cmtinueo') OILIECTIVES: MANAGE THE REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND INSPECT DEVELOPER AND CITY CONSTRUCTED PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES. Ensure that developer and City built parks, trails and recreational projects are designed and ~o~ in ac~ordanc~ with City / TCSD standards. Train a technician to assist in plan review and in~mection. Enhan~ c~ordination between Community Services and other City departments during plan r~view aud constmc~o~ PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of new City parks and facffi~es Number of Master Plans completed PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 0 0 3 4 0 3 6 2 137 City of Temecula DEPARTA4ENT SUA/1MARY- CO.~4/IUN~ SERVICE Pro~n'sm: Maintentnce Services MISSION: The Maintenance Services Program is n:sponm'ble for providing effective landscape and fac~ity nmintenan_cc services to parks, slopes, lxlediaBs, recreation facilities and City admini.~'rativC offices. 199899 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Developed and implemented a service order r~quest maintenance system · Established an effective key managemont systt~n · Provided on-going training to s~tf oil the operation of the City's security system · Established a Citywide alarm monitoring system for fire and security GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: OBJECTIVES: GOAL3: OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE FACHATY, PARK AND TRAIL SYSTEM. ~' Ensure performance compliance of the landscape m~inten3nce contractors. ~. Develop priorities for site repairs, renovations and rehabffitation. DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM TO REHABILITATE AGING SLOPE AREAS. Identify slope areas that are in need of rehabifita~o~ Outline the required rehabffita~on needs of each area identified. Prio~tize the im~ementation ~f the rehabilitation of each identified are~ DEVELOP .AND IMPLEMENT A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES. ~ Invemoty and asses 1he current condition of sites to be included in the progran~ ~ Prioriflze the implementation based on the immediate needs and budget limitations of each site. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Average number of days to complete general maintenance items Number of facility paridng lots receiving annual preventative maintenance Number of slope ~ renovated PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1~' 1997/98 Iv/1997/98 Iv/1998/99 1~ 1999/00 N/A N/A 5 3 N/A N/A 2 3 N/A N/A I 3 138 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT ~UA/tl/IARY- COMITY EERVICES Program: Debt Service MISSION: The Debt Service Program is the operating budget for the Temecula Community Services District Items budgeted include debt service principal and interest, property tax administrative fees, and pass-through agreements. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · All debt service and related costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation were made in a timely manner GOAL 1: ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS. 139 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) 140 City of Temecula INTERNAL ..~ERVICE FUND..~- INSURANCE Exoenditure SUmmary Personnel S Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total $ Funding Source: CharSes to City, Community Service District, and Redevelopment Agency Actual Actual Budgeted Propoled FY 1999-97 FY 1~997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 27,984 452,579 20,243 $ 31,780 $ 32,330 370,727 415,850 '415,580 390,970 $ 447,630 $ 447,910 480,563 $ Personnel Allocation Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Total Authorized Proposed 1998-99 Changes 1999-00 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.50 0.0 0.50 Program: Insurance MISSION: The Insurance Fund is the cost center for the financing and accounting of the City's risk management and insurance functions. Costs reflected in lhe Insurance 'Fund include property, liability, automobile insurance, claims adjuster services, legal and other costs direc~y relating to claims, and potential litigation settlements. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Reduced the City's annual property and liability insurance premium costs by $36,000 while increasing insurance coverage limits at the same time · Implemented a revised insurance standard for businesses wanting to do business with ~e City · Reduced claims administration costs due to efficient internal review of claims Cost Allocation: Charges to departments are allocated based on the number of full-time equivalent personnel in each department. 141 City of Temecula INTERNAL SERVICE FUND.g- VEHICLF_3 Exnenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Funding Source: Charges to City and Community Services District Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed 'FY 1999-97 Far '1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 46,914 $ 58,791 $ 95,610 $ 124,200 $ 46,914 $ 58,791 $ 95,610 $ 124,200 Program: Vehicle Replacement MISSION: 'Cost Allocation: The Vehicle Fund is used to account for the acquisition, depreciation and replacement of City vehicles. Charges to departments are calcUlated based on the actual depreciation charge for vehicles used by each department 14'2 City of Temecula INTERNAL SERFICE FUNDS - INFORMATION ,.VYSTEAtS Funding Source: Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Charges to City, Community Service District, and Redevelopment Agency Actual Actuui Budgeted Proposed FY 1999-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 133309 $ 139,112 486,348 546,931 $ 619,557 $ 686,043 179,690 $ 251,550 662,812 669,760 $ 842,502 $ 921,310 Personnel Allocation Information Systems Administrator h~formation Systems Specialist Total ' Authorized 1998-99 1.00 1.00 Proposed Changes 1999-00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Program.'* Information Systems MISSION: The Information Systems Fund is used to account for the acquisition, depreciation, and replacement of computer and communications (i.e., radios and telephone system) equipment It also serves as the cost center' for telephone and radio system service, as well as computer software and other City dan processing needs. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed and distributed a written Information Systetns Manual to all employees · Provided all City Council members with laptop computers and E-mail to allow better . communication with concerned citizens and staff members · Re. designed the City's Web page, adding information helpful to the citizens of Tcmecula, such as City Council Agendas, City Councilmember E-mail addresses, the City's Municipal Cede and information regarding each City department · Converted to Windows 95 and the Microsoff Office Professional application and trained all City staff, making the transition as smooth as possible · Replaced the City's telecommuuications system at the CRC to ensure Y2K compliance · Tested and are continuing to test systems at the City to assure Y2K compliance Cost Allocation: Charges to departments arc calculated based on the number of computer workstations supported by Information Systems staff in each department. 143 City of Temecula INTERNAL SERFICE FUNDS - SUPPORT SER|/ICES Funding Source: Expenditure Summan' Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Charges to City, Community Service District, and Redevelopment Agency Actual Actual. Budgeted Proposed FY 1999-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 33,982 $ 34,675 171,172 185,178 $ 205,154 $ 219,853 $ 71,500 $ 69,930' 195,205 180,300 $ 266,705 $ 250,230 Personnel Allocation Administrative Technician Total Authorized Proposed 1998-99 Changes 1999-00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Program: Support Services MISSION: The Support Services Fund is the cost centcr for central duplicating services, the mail room, receiving, and copy equipment maintenance for City Hall. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Expanded the lobby reception services to better serve the public Cost Allocation: Charges to deparUnents are calculated based on the number of color and regular copies made by cach department, as well as on the number of on-site personnel for each department. 144 City of Temecula INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS- FACILITIES Expenditure Summary Personnel $ Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total $ Funding Source: Charges to City, Community Service District, and Redevelopment Agency Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1999-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 F¥ 1999-00 108,667 $ 135,507 244~47 139~93 27,306 352,914 $ 302,106 $ 165,120 $ 194~00 212,444 192,250 32,500 27,500 410,064 $ 413,950 Personnel Allocation Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Facilities Coordinator Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Office Assistant Total Authorized Proposed 1998-99 Changes .1999-00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 (0.50) 0.50 0.10 0.20 0.30 2.35 0.50 2.85 Program: Facilities MISSION: The Facilities Fund is used to account for the cost of operating and maintaining City Hall and City Maintenance Facility. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Provided on-going training to staff on security system operation · Established a Citywide fire and security alarm monitoring system Cost Allocation: Charges to departments are calculated based on the square footage of space utilized by each department at City Hall and the City Maintenance Facility. 145 Crhis Page Intenlionally Left Blank) 146 City of Temecula DEP,4RTMENT SUMMER Y - REDEFELOPMENT ~ GENCY HOUSING/ REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER John M~,~r HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT -- Temeeula O.N.E. -- First Time Homebuyer -- Residential Improvement Programs -- Land Acquisition -- Affordable Homing Project Development -- Capital Projects -- Old Town Specific Plan Implementation -- Old Town Advisory Committee -- Community Liaison 147 City of Temecula DEPARTIiIENT SU~IJ!ARY- REDEVELOP~!ENT AGENCY Low/Moderate Income Housing Sot Aside Funding Source: Tax Increment Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual FY 1996-97 $ 65,777 309,157 374,934 Actual Fy 1997-98 $ 209,872 361,816 14,979 586,667 Budgeted FY 1998-99 $ 187,270 885~70 $ 1,072,740 Proposed FY 1999-00 $ 202,150 643,840 $ 845,990 Redevelopment Funding Source: Tax Increment Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 136,249 1,136,389 $ 1,272,638 219,967 $ 90~80 661,349 829,246 7,780 3,000 889,096 $ 922,726 $ 84~30 935,150 $ 1,019,580 Debt Service Expenditure Summary Personnel Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay Actual FY 1996-97 $ 5,237,153 Toml $ 5,237,153 Funding Source: Actual Budgeted FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 5,120,426 $ 4,899,270 5,120~26 $ 4,899,270 Tax Increment Proposed ' FY 1999-00 $ 5,111,820 $ 5,111,820 *Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund. 148 City of Temecula DEPARTA]ENT SUAtAIAR Y- REDEVELOPA!ENT AGENCY Personnel Allocation LOW/MOD HOUSING Housing/Redevelopment Manager Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Sub-Total Authorized 1998-99 0.75 0.75 0.50 Changes 0.00 0.00 0.00 Proposed 1999-00 0.75 0.75 0.50 CIP/REDEVELOPMENT HousinglRedevelopment Manager Senior Management Analyst Administrative Secretary Sub-Total Redevelopmerit Agency Total 0.25 0.25 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.0o 0.25 0.25 0.50 1.00 ' 149 CiO/ of TemecMa DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Program: Housing MISSION: The Housing Program is responsible for developing, rehabilitating, and preserving affordable housing oppommifies. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: GOAL 1: O1LIECTWES: Funded 20 first ~ homebuyers Funded 36 residential improvements, consisting of painting, roofing and fencing PROVIDE QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES AND TO EXPAND THEIR AVAILABILITY. ~. Ensure compliance with State Redevelopment Law. .~. Monitor exisling affordable housing covenant~ · ~. Administer the First Time Homebuyer and Employee Relocation Program-~ .~. Administer the Residential Improvement Program. ~. Acquire land and develop projem to support new affordable housing oppommities. ~. Encourage private investment in the expansion of affordable housing. PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of affordable housing units provided Number of affordable housing units rehabilitated Number of First Time Homebuyers assisted Number of Employee Relocation Homebuyers assisted PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 7 150 76 78 30 20 36 175 20 18 20 15 0 0 0 6 150 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY' Program: Redevelopment MISSION: The Redevelopment Program is responsible for encouraging private investment, removing blight, and promoting economic revitalinflon in the redevelopmerit project 199899 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed construction of the Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project GOAL 1: OBJECTIVES: IMPLEMENT THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. Work with Old Town merchants, prope~y owners, civic groups and the development community to: make private and public improvements in Old Town, develop projects that will revitalize Old Town economy, and assist in the private rehabilitation of buildings in Old Town. Promote and encourage participation in the Facade Improvement Progran~ PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of Facade Improvement projects completed Number of historical structures assisted Number of tedevelopment projects negotiated and completed PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 PROJECTED FY 1999/00 6 3 6 8 6 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 151 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY - REDEFELOPMENT AGENCY Program: Debt Service MISSION: The Debt Service Program is the operating budget for the Redevelopmeat Agency. Items budgeted include debt sexyice principal and interest, property tax administrative fees, and pasthrough agreements. 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · All debt service and related costs for the 1993 Tax Allocatiat Bonds were made in a timely manner GOAL 1: ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS. 152 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEFELOPMENT BLOCK GR/INT Funding Source: Exi~enditure Summary Personnel Operations & Maintenance Capital Outlay Total Community Development Block Grants Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 $ 447,403 $ 391,390 S 447,403 $ 391,390 $ 314,610 $ 314,610 585200 585200 153 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Program: Community Development Block Grant MISSION: The Comnnmity Development Block Grant Program is a mechanism for providing federal funding for local projects. The Program is administered through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency: 1998-99 ACCOMPLISHIVIENTS: · Administered a!ld monitored Commu!lity Development Block Grant sponsored progrsn~ totaling $314,610 · Served 12,396 meals through the Emergency Food end Aid Program, end assisted in the relocation of this program to a permanent site · Provided new clothing and school suppries to more than 800 school age children through Operation School Bell · Received preliminary approval for a $252,750 advance funding request for the Senior Center Expansion project OBJECTIVES: PROVIDE DIRECT BENEFIT TO LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS OF THE COMMUNITY IN ORDER TO PREVENT AND ELIMINATE SLUM OR BLIGHT. THE PROGRAM GOAL IS ORIENTED TO MEETING A PARTICULAR URGENCY FOR AN EMERGENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEED. Conduct public noticing and receive, review and evalume nil input Review CDBG applications and make recommendsions to the City Council for funding options. Submit City Council-approved applications to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency Prepare and submit progratn reimbursement and monthly direct benefit dam to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. 154 CRy of Temecula DEPARTA4ENT SUMMARY- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY (This section to be updated after the adoption of the Capital Improvement Program budget) 155 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) 156 City of Temecula DESCRIPTION OF CIP REVENUE SOURCES Assembly Bill 2766 (AB 2766). State funds which are available to implement progralns and projects that reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. Assessment District (AD~. A tool that allows the City to construct desired and authorized public improvements, with the costs and expenses of the project being paid for by the bene~ted properties within the boundaries of a designated area. The project costs are then financed through the issuance of bonds payable over a period of years. Canital Projects Reserves (General Fund). Funds made available from City of Temecula General Fund. Community Develonment Block Grants (CDBG). /~unds allocated to local government from the federal government, usually through a local clearinghouse (Riverside County Economic Development Agency), based on a formula, but required to be applied for and required to be used within a broad functional area such as community development. Communitv Facilities District (CFD). A tool that allows the City to construct desired and authorized public improvements, with the costs and expenses of the project being paid for by the bene~ted properties within the boundaries of a designated area. The project costs are then financed through the issuance of bonds payable over a period of years. Develonment Imnact Fees (DIF and DW-Various). Fees generated by development applications to offset the effect of development to include infrastructure, fire protection, public facilities and services, libraries, roads, schools, parks, and traffic signal mitigation. Fees are determined by the cost of the project at the time of application. DIF/Park-in-Lieu Fees (0 uimbv). The City's park-in-lieu or park development fee is assessed under provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which allows the City to require the dedication of land, or the payment of a fee in lieu of land to be used for the purchase (or development) of park property. DlFffraf~c Signal Mitil~ation Fees (Silenal Mitilmtion). Fees required of a developer/builder for purposes of providing the actual or estiinated costs of constructing future regional traffic signalization improvements in the vicinity of the development/building. These funds may be used only for the construction or reimbursement for construction of traffic signals willfin the area from which the fees comprising the fund were collected. Interest accruing from these funds can be used anywhere within the City. Federal Hiphwav Administration (FHWA). Federal funds which are available for highway improvements. ' Hi!~hwav Bridlee Reolacement and Rehabilitation Pro!~ram (HBRR). Federal funds which are available to improve or replace aging bridges. Intermodal Surface Transoortation Efficiency Act (1STEA). Federal funds which are available for street and road improvements and repairs. ISTEA/Conl~estion Mitiuation & Air Qualitv lmorovement Proleram ilSTEA/CMAQ). Federal funds, which are available for the development and implemenlafion of transportation programs, that reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. ISTEA/Surface Transnortation Prol~ram (ISTEA/STP). Federal funds, which are available for local agencies, to improve the safety and efficiency of the local transporlation system. Funds are available for both planning and construction phases of improvement projects. ISTEA/Transnortation Enhancement Activities (TEA). Federal funds, which are available for local agencies, to improve the aesthetics and efficiency of the local transportation system. Funds are available for both planning and construction phases of improvement projects. Measure AfMeasure A Loan. Funds generated frown the one-half percent sales tax levied throughout Riverside County to carry out transportation projects by the County and cities. 157 City of Temecula DESCRIPTION OF C1P REVENUE SOURCES (Continued) Redevelooment Aeencv Tax Increment Bond Funds (RDA). The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) has the authority to pay for public improvements, which will be repaid fxom tax revenue, received by the Agency. The size of the bond issue is dependent on the amount of tax revenue received. lqo additional tax is paid by properties within the redevelopment area. The total property tax paid by a property owner is limited by the State Constitution. The Agency receives its revenue from its ability to collect the full amount of taxes paid by all new development (above a - base figure established by 'the County), rather than sharing this tax growth with other agencies, except as specified in various .pass through agreements. RDA/Low/Moderate Housing, (RDA=Housin~,~. This funding source is available from the City's Redevelopment Agency. State Law requires that 20% of gross RDA proceeds be set aside to fund housing opportunities for low and moderate-income families. Reimbursement A~,reements. Funding made available from other agencies or sources on a reimbursement basis. The actual reimbursement agreement states the conditions of reimbursement specific to a particular project. Senate Bill 821 fSB 821). SB-821 grant funds are applied for projects that enhance bicycle commuting and thus relieve parallel roadways. SB-821 funds are progrmmned by the Riverside County Transportation Commission from a state apportionment. 'Half of the county wide SB-821 Program ("Local" funds) is allocated to cities and the county on a population formula basis, the other half ("Regional" funds) is awarded on a competitive basis to projects bene~ting the county wide bike trail system. The SB-821 Local Funds may also be used on pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks and handicap ramps. 158 City of Temecula GLOSSA R Y OF TERMS ABATEMENT - Abatements usually apply to tax levies, special assessments and service charges. ACCOUNT GROUPS - Accounting entities used to establish control over and accountability for the government's general fixed assets and the unmatured principal of its general long-term debt, including special assessment debt for which the government is obligated in some manner. 'ACCOUNTING SYSTEM - The methods and records established to identify, assemble, analyze, classify, record and rep0. n a government' s transactions and.to maintain accountability for the related assets and liabilities. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - A short-term liability account reflecting mounts owed to private persons or organizations for goods and services received by a government. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - An asset account reflecting mounts due ~'om private persons or organizations for goods and services furnished by a government )but not including mounts due from other governments). ACCRUED SALARIES AND WAGES PAYABLE - A liability account reflecting salaries and wages earned by employees but not due until a later date. ADOPTION - Formal action by the City Council that sets the spending limits for the fiscal year. AGENCY FUND - A fund normally used to account for assets held by a government as an agent for individuals, private organizations or other governments and/or other funds. The agency fund also is used to report the assets and liabilities of Internal Revenue Code, Section 457, deferred compensation plans. APPROPRIATION - A legal authorization granted by the City Council to make expenditures and incur obligations for specific purposes. ASSET - A probable future economic benefit obtained or controlled by a particular entity as a result of past transactions or events. AUDIT - A systematic collection of the sufficient, competent evidenlial matter needed to attest to the fairness of managements assertions in the financial statements or to evaluate whether management has efficiently and effectively carried out its responsibilities. BALANCE SHEET - The financial statement disclosing the assets, liabilities, and equity of an entity at a specified date in conformity with GAAP. BUDGET - A plan'of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and the proposed means of financing them. Used without any modifier, the term usually indicates a financial plan for a single fiscal year. BUDGETARY CONTROL - The control or management of a govemment or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and revenues. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) - Annual appropriations in the City's budget for capital purposes such as street improvements, building construction, and park improvements. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - Ex!~nditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government's general fixed assets having a unit cost of greater than $1,000 and a useful life exceeding one year. CAPITAL OUTLAY - Exl~enditures which qualify as capital costs according to accounting standards. This includes furniture, fixtures, machinery, equipment, and other relatively minor fixed assets. 159 City of Temecula GLOSSARY OF TERMS rContinued) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) - Funds allocated to local government from the federal government, usually through a local clearinghouse (Riverside County Economic Development Agency), based on a formula, but required to be applied for and required to be used within a broad functional area such as community development. CONTINGENCY - A budgetary reserve set aside for emergency or unanticipated expenditures. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - Contracts for professional services. DEPARTMENT - An organizational unit comprised of programs and program managers. A single director manages' each department. DEBT SERVICE FUND - A fund established to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt principal and interest. Sometimes referred to as a Sinking Func[ ENCUMBRANCES - An amount of money committed for the payment of goods and services not yet received or paid for. EXPENDITURES - The present of future use of net current assets, debt service and capital outlays, and intergovernmental grants, entitlements and shared revenues. FISCAL YEAR - The period designated by the City for the beginning and ending of financial transactions. The fiscal year begins July I and ends June 30. FRANCHISE - A special privilege granted by a government, permitting the continued use of public property, such as refuse disposal and cable television, and usually involving the elements of monopoly and regulation. FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE) - The amount of time a position has been budgeted for in terms of the amount of time a regular, full-time employee normally works in a year. Most full-time employees are paid for 2,080 hours in a year. FUND - An accounting entity with a set of self-balancing revenue and expenditure accounts used to record the -financial affairs of a governmental organization. 'FUND BALANCE - The difference between the assets (revenues and other resources) and liabilities (expenditures incurred or committed to) for a particular fund. GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT - This term refers to Article XIIIB of the California State Constitution 'which places limits on the amount of proceeds from taxes that state and local governmental agencies can receive and spend each year. GENERAL FUND - The fund used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund (i.e., enterprise or grant funds). Usually, the General Fund is the largest fund in a mtmicipality. GOALS - The desired result of accomplishments within a given time frame, usually a fiscal year. GRANTS - Contributions or gifts of cash or other assets from another government to be used or expended for a specified purpose, activity, or facility. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - A fund usod to account for financing of goods or services provided by one department to other departments on a cost-reimbursement basis. LONG-TERM DEBT - Debt with a maturity of more than one year after the date of issue. 160 City of Temecula GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Continued) MOTOR VEHICLE IN LIEU - A slate subvention revenue that is calculated annually by the Slate on a per capita basis. OBJECTIVES - The necessary steps needed to be accomplished to achieve a desired goal. OBJECTS OF EXPENDITURE - The individual expenditure accounts used to record each type of expenditure City operations incur. For budgeting purposes, objects of expenditure are eategorized into groups of similar types of expenditures called major objects of expenditure. The principal objects of expenditure used in' the budget are: Personal Services, Maintenance and Operations, and Capital Outlay. OPERATING BUDGET - Plans of current expenditures and the proposed means of financing them. The annual operating budget is the primary means by which most of the financing, acquisition, spending and service delivery activities of a govermnent are controlled. OPERATING EXPENSES - Proprietary fund expenses related directly to the fund's primary activities. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE - Office supplies and other materials used in the normal operations of City deparunents. Includes items such as books, maintenance materials, and contractual services. PERSONNEL - Salaries and benefits paid to City employees. Includes items such as special duty salaries and retirement. PROGRAMS/DEPARTMENTS - The budget organizes departmental expenditures into functional areas called programs. RDA/LOW/IVIODERATE HOUSING (RDA Housing) - This funding source is available from the City's Redevelopment Agency. Slate law requires that 20% of gross RDA proceeds be set aside to ftmd housing opportunities for low and moderate-income families. RESOURCES - Total amounts available for appropriation including estimated revenues, fund transfers, and beginning balances. REVENUES - The yield of taxes and other sources of income that a governmental unit collects and receives for public use. " SPECIAL ASSESSMENT - A compulsory levy made against certain properties to defray all or part of the cost of a specific capital improvement or service deemed to benefit primarily those properties. TAXES - Compulsory charges levied by a government to finance services performed for the common benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or properly for current or permanent benefits, such as special assessments. Neither does the term include charges for services ren~lered only to those paying such charges. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) - An assessment district that was established in Temecula to provide a comprehensive, balanced neighbod~ood and community park system by constan~y reviewing growth, demographics and facilities available. It also provide tree management, hazardous waste procedures and a recycling program for the community. TRANSFERS IN/OUT - Payments from one fund to another fund primarily for work or services provided. USER CHARGES/FEES - The payment of a fee for direct receipt of a public service by the party bene~ting from the service (i.e., swimming pool fees, recreation classes). 161 City of Temecula ASSESSED & ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERIT (values in thousands) FROM INCORPORATION Total Exemptions Net Secured and Veteran Assessed Exemptions Fiscal Year Unsecured Church. etc. Value Homeowners 1991 $ 2,232,491 $ (11,913) $ 2,220,578 S (27,927) 1992 2,626,508 (15,304) 2,611,204 (30,503) 1993 2,904,762 (22, 111) 2,882,651 (34,149) 1994 3,022,349 (23,719) 2,998,630 (39,448) 1995 3,015,867 (29,906) 2,985,961 (44,082) 1996 3,167,818 (34,277) 3,133,541 (47,905) 1997 3,217,540 (36,629) 3,180,911 (53,023) 1998 3,298,247 (42,596) 3,255,651 (56,665) Net Total Assessed Value $ 2,192,651 2,580,701 2,848,502 2,959,182 2,941,879 3,085,636 3,127,888 3,198,986 Estimated Actual Value °$ 2,192,651 2,580,701 2,848,502 2,959,182 2,941,879 3,085,636 3,127,888 3,198,986 Note: Date of incorporation was December 1, 1989; therefore, 1990 data is unavailable. Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office 162 Ci02 of Temecula FEDERAL GRANT EXPENDITURES Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant Department of Justice COPS Fast Local Law Enforcement Block Grant, 1996 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant, 1997 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant, 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant, 1999 Universal Hiring Grant Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction State and Community Highway Safety Federal Emergency Management Agency Disaster Assistance Totals Actual FY 1996-97 $ 329,762 42,878 21,125 243,387 40,000 $ 677,152 Actual FY 1997-98 $ 391,388 24,626 45,544 423,298 98.678 $ 983,534 Estimated FY 1998-99 $ 314,610 45,000 928,800 $1,288,4 10 Budgeted FY 1999-00 $ '585,200 53,600 50,000 6,924,600 $ 7,613,400 Soilreel City of Temecula, Finance Department 163 City of Temecula CONSTRUCTION, BANK DEPOSITS, AND PROPERIT VALUE (value in thousands) FROM1NCORPORA TION Commercial Construction Residential Construction (1) (1) Fiscal Number of Number of Year Units Value Units Value 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Bank Deposits (2) Total 232 $ 18,717 387 $ 6~07 N/A 158 902 337 10,605 $ 330,514 150 6,316 802 50,347 299~66 130 10,639 1,186 113902 338~74 162 29,221 968 85,410 371914 136 23,572 987 93,674 415927 202 32,863 857 85,257 510920 203 66,226 835 105,527 632,938 Property Values (3) Commercial Residential 1,270,735 $1,353,396 1,473,713 · 1,454,943 1,526,397 1,489,077 1,466307 1,539,257 1,478,339 1,677,720 1,347,175 1,856,215 1,151,327 1,958,706 1,378,543 2,067,549 Note: Date of incorporation was December 1, 1989; therefore, 1990 information is unavailable. Source: (1) City of Temecula Building and Safety Department (2) Data unavailable (3) County Land Use Statistical Recap Report 164 City of Temecula PROPERTY TAX RATES- DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS FROM 1NCORPORA TION Basic County Fiscal Year City and School Taxes School Lew City District 1991 $ 1.0000 1992 1.0000 1993 1.0000 1994 1.0000 1995 1.0000 1996 1.0000 1997 1.0000 1998 1.0000 Various Water Districts 0.0492 $ 0.4565 O. 1469 0.4468 0~0714 0.4440 0.0543 0.4429 0.0685 0.4175 0.0944 0.3720 O. 10 11 0.3708 1.1121 0.3399 Total 1.5057 1.5937 1.5154 1.4972 1.4860 1.4664 1.4719 1.4520 Note: Date of incorporation was December 1, 1989; therefore, 1990 information is unavailable. Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office 165 City of Temecula PRINCIPAL SECURED PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30. 1998 Taxoaver International Recti~er Corporation Guidant Corporation Randor Landgrant Rancho California Palm Plaza Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc. AEW LBA Acquisition Company Magellan Acacia Park Limited Partnership Palomar Village Properties, Inc. LGA 7, Inc. BWIP International Tvoe of Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Real Estate Development Real Estate Development Manufacturing Real Estate Development Real Estate Development Real Estate Development Real Estate Development Manufacturing 1998 Assessed Valuation (in thousands) $ 174,03 1 78,001 47,263 31,286 25,663 19,679 16,295 14,356 14,080 13.833 $. 434.487 Percentage of Total Assessed Valuation 5.41% 2.42% 1.47% 0.97% 0.80% 0.61% 0.51% 0.45% 0.44% 0.43% 13.51% Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office 166 CiO~ of Temecula LEGAL DEBT MARGIN Computation of Legal Debt Margin (value in thousands) as of June 30. 1998 Net assessed value Plus exempt property Total assessed value Debt Limit - 15% of total assessed value Amount of debt applicable to debt limit Total bonded debt Less assets in debt service funds available for payment of principal Total amount of debt applicable to debt limit Legal Debt Margin 3,198,986 56.665 3.255.651 488.348 488.348 Source: City of Temecula, Finance Department 167 City of Temecula COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT AS OF JUNE 30, t998 1997-98 Assessed Valuation: $2,671,896,891 (aria deducting $566,124,369 redevelopmeat incremental valuation) DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT: Metropolitan Water District FAtstern Municipal Water District, I.D. No. U8 Temecula Valley Unified School District Temecula Valley Unified School District Community Facilities Dislrict No. 89-3 City of Temecula Rancho Califomia Water District, Raneho Division Rancho California Water District, Santa Rosa Division Rancho California Water District, Community Facilities District No. 88-3 Riverside County Community Facilities District No. gg-12 Riverside County 1915 Act Bonds (Estimated) TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX ASSESSMENT DEBT % Applicable 0.327°/~ 87.515 71.186 100.000 100.000 70.297 1.930 100.000 100.000 Various Deb~ 6/30/98 1,815,193 6,287,953 39,490,434 27,460,000 0 6,695,789 403,177 6,920,000 1 g,690,000 76.017.243 183.779.789 OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND OBLIGATION DEBT: Riverside County General Fund Obligations 4.587% Riverside County Board of Education Certificates of Particlpation 4.587 Riverside County Hood Control and Water Conservation District General Fund Obligations 5.448 Temecula Unified School District Certificates of Partlcipation 71.186 Temecula Community Services District Certificates of Participation 100.000 Rancho Califomia Water District Certificates of Participation 48.236 TOTAL GROSS OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND OBLIGATION DEBT Less: Temecula Unified School District Certificates of Participation (self-supporting from tax increment revenues) 26,688,467 892,727 73,003 9,741,804 4,560,000 89.819.513 131,775,514 4,698.276 TOTAL NET DIRECT AN D OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND OBLIGATION DEBT 127,077,238 GROSS COMBINED TOTAL DEBT $ 315,555,303 (1) NET COMBINED TOTAL DEBT $ 3 10,857,027 (1) Excludes tax and revenue'anticipation notes, revenue, mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and non-bonded capital lease obligations. Ratios to 1997-98 Assessed Valuation: Direct Debt ...............................................................................................................................................................0.00% Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt ..................................................................................... 5.68% Ratios to Adjusted Assessed Valuation: Gross Combined Total DebL .................................................................................................................................11.81% Net Combined Total Debt .....................................................................................................................................11.63% SHARE OF AUTHORIZED AND UNSOLD GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS: Rancho California Water District, Rancho Division ............................................................................................$7,479,601 Rancho California Water District, Santa Rosa Division .........................................................................................$365,446 Eastern Municipal Water District, I.D. No. U8 ....................................................................................................$4,550,780 Temecula Unified School District .........................................................................................................................$4,769,462 STATE SCHOOL BUILDING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 6/30/98:$0 1997-98 TYPICAL TOTAL TAX RATE (TRA 13-004): 1.17901 (Special Assessment Rate.3000) Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 168 City of Temecula LARGE EMPLOYERS BY NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AS OF JUNE 30. 1998 EmDIover Guidant Corporation Temecula Valley Unified School District InternatiOnal Recti~er.(Hexfet America) Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc. ' Professional Hospital Supply Channell Commercial Maxxim Medical Bianchi International Opto 22 CJ Resorts, Inc. BW/IP International, Inc. - Seal Division Price Costco City of Temecula (includes seasonal part-time) Siena Pacific Faxms, Inc. Plant Equipment, Inc. Temecula Creek Inn Magnecomp Dayton Hudson Corporation/Target Norm Reeves Auto Group California Landscape Maintenance Capistrano Gardens Nursery Eco-Farms Field, Inc. Molding International American Materiel Management Alliance Claim-Jumper Milgard Manufacturing Lucky Stores Florasense by Endar Mervyn's Tension Envelope K-Mart Corporation Rancho California Water District Number of Emolovees 1,370 1,293 550 400 375 265 248 224 218 205 204 194 184 183 180 167 165 161 154 150 148 146 142 '139. 135 128 125 124 120 117 115 109 Source: City of Temecula, Finance Department 169 (This Page Intentionally Leg Blank) 170/FINAL ITEM 28 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager''~'''~'''' June 22,1999 SUBJECT: Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Permitting, Approval, Development, and Placement of Additional Wireless Communications Facilities RECOMMENDATION: Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entiled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING, APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT AND PLACEMENT OF ALL FORMS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES BACKGROUND: At their June 8, 1999 meeting the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance prohibiting additional wireless telecommunications facilities until after the City has had an opportunity to prepare additional locally appropriate standards and requirements. Attached to this Agenda Report is a copy of the proposed ordinance. ATTACHMENT: 1. Draft urgency ordinance - Page 2 R:~STAFFRPT~Urgency Antenna Moratorium CC .doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DRAFT ORDINANCE \\TEMEC_FS201%DATA~DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT\Urgency Antenna Moratodum CC.doc 2 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING, APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT AND PLACEMENT OF ALL FORMS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES A. Recitals. (i) The City of Temecula has experienced an increase in the development of, and requests to develop, wireless telecommunicetion facilities. The City has experienced development of a wide variety of facility type and design, including, but not limited to, building mounted antenna arrays, monopole mounted antenna arrays, stealth/disguise types of monopoles and roof top mountained antenna arrays. The City currently has no zoning and design standards that are reasonably appropriate and applicable to the review and analysis of the various types of wireless communication facilities and the siting issues related to the structures. (ii) The City of Temecula's General Plan, when adopted, did not anticipate the scope of wireless telecommunications present in today's marketplace. Accordingly, the General Plan's provisions regarding public utilities and institutional uses does not adequately address the circumstances presented by current telecommunication development issues, including, but not limited to siting and design factors. (iii) The City Council of the City of Temecula has determined that the lack of the adequate general plan, zoning and design standards referenced above has, and will continue to, negatively impact the health, safety and welfare of the City. This lack of adequate land use regulations, including the lack of adequate standards related to the design, location, size and placement of such facilities, has and will result in: the wasting of resources by involved parties; confusion and uncertainty among applicants, the public and the City as to the review criteria applicable to the siting design and regulation of such facilities; the jeopardizing of property values and further causes a negative impact on community attractiveness and aesthetics, including, but not limited to surrounding property view impairment, the over- development of parcels, the over-concentration of wireless telecommunication facilities and inappropriate or undesirable "disguising" methodologies. Individually, and in their totality, these facts and circumstances support this City Council imposing an interim ordinance prohibiting the further issuance of permits, approvals, and the development and placement of wireless telecommunication facilities until such time as the City has reviewed and revised the City's general plan and zoning ordinance to appropriately regulate these facilities. (iv) This City Council further finds that the City continues to receive inquiries and interest in the further development and placement of additional wireless telecommunications facilities. This demand for development, in light of the lack of appropriate general plan and zoning standards presents a circumstance that is a public urgency and which requires the immediate protection of the City's health, safety and welfare. The City council, after review and consideration of all the facts and issues discussed herein, finds and determines that the permitting, approval, development and placement of wireless R:ords/99-urgency 1 telecommunication facilities shall be immediately prohibited in the City until the City has taken adequate time to develop standards and regulations for such facilities. The standards and regulation shall regulate the design, configuration, location and co-location, size, placement aesthetic characteristics and all other land-use factors relating to such facilities. This immediate prohibition is necessary to prevent the negative impacts discussed in the foregoing sections from further proliferating negatively impacting the City's health, safety and welfare. (v) All preconditions to the adoption of this interim ordinance as an urgency measure under California Government Code Section 36937(b) and as an interim zoning ordinance under California Govemment Code Section 65858 have occurred as required by law. B. Ordinance. The city council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Ordinance, which recitals are hereby wholly incorporated by reference herein. Section 7. This City Council intends this Interim Ordinance to be immediately effective under California Government Code Section 36937(b) and declares that the facts set forth hereinabove constitute the declaration of urgency required as a precondition to the adoption of an urgency ordinance by said Section 36937(b). Further, this City Council intends this enactment to be an interim ordinance, effective immediately, under the authority of California Government Code Section 65858 serving to prohibit the permitting, approval development and placement of wireless telecommunication facilities. This interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days after its adoption. The Planning Department and City Clerk shall cause notice, pursuant to the requires of California Government Code Section 65090 to be given and a public hearing to be held prior to the lapse of said forty-five (45) day period to consider the extension of the interim ordinance for ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days. Further, the Planning Department shall prepare and submit the report required by California Government Code Section 65858(d) to the City Council in a time frame sufficient to allow the City Council to review and issue the same as required by law. Section 3. All wireless telecommunication facilities that have been granted approvals and entitlements for the development and placement of such facilities prior to the date this interim ordinance is adopted shall be allowed to proceed with development and operation notwithstanding this enactment. Section4. The Planning Department is directed to continue and/or commence the preparation of general plan and zoning ordinance amendments that establish standards, beneficial to the needs of this City, for the regulation of all aspects of wireless telecommunication facilities. This City Council declares it is its goal to accomplish the preparation and adoption of the general plan and zoning regulations in an expedited manner that will result in the least delay upon the further development of wireless telecommunication systems. Further, to the extend feasible, the policies set forth in the guidelines for moratoria, as promulgated by the Federal Communication Commission's Local and State Government Advisory Committee shall be implemented by City staff as regards involving wireless service providers in the process of developing revisions to the general plan and zoning ordinance. R:ords/99-urgency 2 Section 5. This City Council has determined that the adoption of this interim ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant impact on the environment (Title 14 California Code of Regulations 15061 (b)(3).) This City Council hereby determines that the prohibition set forth in this interim ordinance has no possibility of having or causing a significant effect on the environment, thus removing this action from the application of CEQA. Section 6. Penalties for Violation of Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance. Section 7. Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 8. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. R:ords/99-urgency 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1999. Steven J. Ford Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99- , was duly adopted and passed as an Urgency Ordinance at a regular meeting of the City Council on June 22, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:ords/99-urgency 4 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL f///4j~/' CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City ManagedCity Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager June 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Departmental Repod The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of May 1999. Economic Development Staff developed the City of Temecula User Guide to City Services and is scheduled to go to print in two weeks. The guide provides the following contacts and phone numbers to businesses. · Business Assistance and Support · City Departments · Emergency Services · Government Offices Representing Temecula · Housing Assistance · Parks & Recreation · Planning & Building Contacts · Schools/Library · Utilities & Services · Visitor Information The guide will be distributed to businesses when they come into City Hall to renew or apply for their business license. For those businesses that have renewed their license in 1999, a guide will be sent to them. In addition, the Business Retention Committee will distribute this source at the time they meet with individual businesses. Staff has met with Dennis Frank, UCR Program Manager, several times this month on finalizing the UCR Extension Brochure. This brochure will be included in the City's business kit. Jim O'Grady attended the Temecula CONNECT meeting on Friday, May 14. Attracting venture capital & internet phone connection was discussed. Jim O'Grady attended a meeting of the EDC Business Retention Committee on May 6th' Staff provided City business brochures & real estate newsletters to NASCAL. The company attended a Job Fair in Pennsylvania at the end of May. They are trying to recruit employees to relocate to Temecula. One of NASCAL's largest competitors is AMP (stamping company). AMP recently laid off a large amount of their employees and NASCAL is hoping to attract those employees to work here in Temecula and/or with their other sister companies. Councilmember Ron Roberts, Shawn Nelson and Jim O'Grady met with representatives of the County, Lake Elsinore and Murrieta on May 4th and May 18th to discuss regional approaches for Economic Development and Marketing. Staff met with the Southwest Riverside County EDC on May 4th and May 18th to discuss GIS mapping capabilities, marketing/planning issues, leads and programs. Staff and the EDC met with a local professional photographer regarding a photo shoot to include businesses/business districts and golf to be utilized for the trade show booth, media and marketing materials. Gloria Wolnick attended the TeamCalifornia Marketing Task Force Meeting in Ontario on May 6th. TeamCalifornia is a cooperative network of public and private economic development leaders that brings together resources and expertise from organizations throughout the state to promote business investment and job creation. Topics that were covered at the meeting included California's statewide marketing campaign, discussion of trade shows to attend, proposed media plan, budget and new ad development. Gloria Wolnick attended the IEEP membership luncheon at the San Bernardino Hilton on May 20th. Deputy Secretary Joyce Wallach spoke on the state's positive working relationship with the SBDC and the IEEP. Allie Kuhns attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturer's Council meeting on May 12th. Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce Newsletter focusing on Temecula Traffic News. The traffic newsletter is designed to inform the businesses and residents of Temecula about Capital Improvement projects and their status. In addition to this tool for communication, the City of Temecula Traffic Safety Commission adopted two other programs for informing the public: an interactive traffic map that can be found on the City's website and a toll-free traffic hotline. Media Outreach The City advertised in the May issues of Business Facilities and BioPharm magazines. Temecula received strong editorial in the California issue that focused on biotech expansion strategies - "Selecting a Site For The Biotech Industry". Temecula's biotech industry was highlighted and included Chemicon and Guidant (see attached). Business Facilities is a monthly site selection tool for over 40,500 corporate site selectors with over 486,000 impressions a year. 2 Staff provided Tony Ault, Rancho News writer, with business information and requested a copy of the recent Business Facilities article that featured Temecula. Mr. Ault is writing an article on the Westside Business area. Staff provided Brad Fickes, writer for The Californian, with business information and a copy of the recent Business Facilities article for an article that he is writing. The City placed a full-page ad in The Business Press 1999 Inland Empire City Guide and also received a City profile (see attached). Leads and In(;!uiries In the month of May, the City responded to 1 lead for a manufacturing company and 12 inquiries. Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building can be found in the Community Development Department report. Tourism Staff is coordinating with the Chamber and TTA on The Great Race event, which will be held on June 19, 1999. Staff artended meetings that were held on May 12, 19 and 26th. Staff supplied Temecula tourism brochures, Vintner brochures and Old Town Walking Tour Maps to The Event Team, a destination management company in San Diego, on t May 19 h. The company brought up a convention group to tour Temecula the week of May 24th. Gloria Wolnick attended the Inland Empire Tourism Council Board Meeting on May 26t~. IETC placed a ¼ page advertisement in Sunset Magazine in April and May. IETC mailed out over 1,000 City of Temecula rack brochures responding to ad requests for the first month. Staff delivered additional tourism brochures to IETC to respond to requests for their second ad. IETC is assisting with the production of the Inland Empire State Fair Exhibit. The exhibit will take on a regional appearance. This is a partnership between Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Media Outreach The quarterly calendar of events was prepared and sent out to the media with distribution reaching local and national media. Staff prepared and sent out a press release on the Great Race to the City's media database. Magazine coverage of the event includes: Olde San Diego Gazette, The Country Review, Entertainment Roundup, Neighbors Magazine, The Valley Business Journal, and The Desert Sun Next Magazine. Articles have appeared in the Rancho News and the Press-Enterprise. 3 Staff provided Allan Rider, an AAA travel writer, with specific demographic information on Temecula, history and sent him a press kit. Mr. Rider is writing an adicle for Westways Magazine, which reaches 3+million members. Staff worked with Jean Penn of The Desert Sun on an article on Temecula. The article titled "A Day of Wine and Oldies" was featured in their May issue of the Desert Sun Next Magazine (see attached). Staff worked with travel writer Lynn Allie and Jill Hunnybovy, associate editor, of Appalachian Wine Magazine on an article "Wines of the Temecula Valley which will appear in their September-October issue. The publication also contacted the Vintner's Association for information. Temecula Wine Country was represented in an advertising supplement to the Business Press. The "Hospitality and Entertainment" piece was published on May 24th and was sponsored by the Riverside Convention Center and the Inland Empire Economic Partnership. Local talent Ben Robinson was invited to perform on The David Letterman Show in May. Ben is a very talented 13-year-old Temecula resident who performed at the recent Balloon and Wine Festival. Staff sent one gift basket filled with Temecula items (i.e. wine glasses, Temecula golf shirt, Balloon & Wine - Rod Run souvenirs, Taste of Temecula salsa, etc.) to David Letterman, members of his band and Ben's talent scouts. They were appreciative of our gift. Ben is to be invited back for the show in the near future. Attachments: Southwest Riverside County EDC Activity Report Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activity Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activity Report Magazine Articles and Ads 4 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 June 9, 1999 Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager City of Temecuia 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn: Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of May at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights 8 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet which includes information on demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, 'organizations, etc. Committee Highlights Tourism Committee: Plans for the "Great Race" are in their final stages. The event is scheduled for Saturday, June 19m in Old Town Temecula. Chamber staff contacted over 50 businesses in the conununity and has secured the sponsors for the event. The staff was able to obtain the printing of sponsors' logos on 3,000 Great Race posters, donated by Maurice Printers. Members of the Tourism Committee will volunteer to assist withthis event. The Tounsm Committee is continuing its Group/Individual Package promotion. In May the Chamber received six requests for Group/Individual Packages - two were successfully booked. The One-page Street maps were distributed to area hotels, TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center and throughout Old Town. Ann Gallegher of the Orange County Visitor & Convention Bureau was the guest speaker this month. Ann spoke on marketing, familiarization tours, industry sales, travel shows, etc. Education Committee: The Chamber's Student of the Year luncheon was held on June 1, 1999, at Sizzler American C,-rill in Temecula. The memorable event awarded eight students chosen from previous Student of the Month recipients. The honorees are as follows: Joshua Falls and Juliann Smith of Chaparral High School; Jonathan Cole and Judy Marshall of Rancho Vista High School; Jason Stone and Rachel Gostenhofer of Temecula Valley High School; and Ryan McAllister and Leslie Thompson of The Linfield High School. Ways & Means Committee: The committees for Monte Carlo and the Business Showcase will meet in June for the first meeting in order to prepare for the upcoming events. Monte Carlo will be held August 18, at Embassy Suites Hotel. The Business Showcase is slated for October 20. Location to be announced. Local Business Promotions Committee: They are continuing with final preparations for the Success Seminar Series "Unleash Your Marketing Power!" scheduled for June 8, 1999, at Embassy Suites Hotel. The "Shop Temecula First .... because it just makes Sense" June campaign commenced on June 1, with eighty-two participants. The Press-Enterprise is the campaign sponsor. A weekly customer winner and merchant winner will be rewarded with many gifts and certificates from local businesses. The Grand Prize winning customer will receive 1,000 cash, courtesy of our sponsor, the Press Enterprise. The Grand prize merchant winner will receive $500. The Press Enterprise will provide photo coverage of both the Grand Prize Customer and Business. The Shop Temecula First Committee will participate in the 4m of July parade. Government Action Committee: The Temecula and Murrieta Chambers are in the process of planning to host a City Council Candidates Forum for each city. The Chamber will take a stance to oppose SB402 (Burton and Villaraigosa) which will mandate binding arbitration for police and firefighters. If passed, approval of police and firefighters contracts will be decided by unelected arbitrators. A letter was approved by the committee concerning initiating efforts to obtain funding for transportation improvements affecting routes to the Eastside Reservoir and the widening of the 2 15 freeway from Mumeta to Perils. Letters requesting assistance were sent to local and state legislators. The committee is focusing their efforts on informing businesses of legislation which affects employers. The TVCC will continue to broadcast fax and provide information in the Temecula Today! newsletter. Membership Committee: Ambassadors attended 19 ribbon cuttings in May. The May mixer at Sir Speedy was very successful. Over 250 business members were in attendance. The mixers are held monthly and are a great opportunity for businesses to network. The May Ambassador Networking Breakfast welcomed 73 business members. The Breakfast features two speakers monthly. Each month, members have the opportunity to be in a speaker drawing. The Membership Committee is hosting a special topic breakfast on July 28, 7:30-9:00 am at the Embassy Suites Hotel. Topic: "The Mall .... What does it mean to you?" Featured speakers include Shawn Nelson- Acting City Manager, Jim O'Grady -Assistant City Manager, Gall Enderwood - Forest City Director of Leasing, Steve Schafenasker - Project Developer and Mayor Pro-Tern Jeff Stone as the facilitator. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 500 School Brochures, 450 Temecula Brochures and 25 Visitor Guides to Temecula Unified School for distribution at the district office. · 400 Winery Brochures and 225 Visitor Guides to Silver Spoon Caf~ for distribution to tourist in Old Town. · 225 Visitor Guides to Ken Westmeyer (Comfort Inn) for distribution at a sales blitz in Arizona. · 150 School Brochures and 150 Temecula Brochures to Coldwell Banker for distribution to prospective home buyers. · 100 Visitor Guides to Rosa's Cantina for distribution to tourists. · 50 Old Town Maps, 50 Temecula Brochures and 39 Travel Packets to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center for distribution to visitors. · 50 Old Town Maps, 50 Temecula Brochures and 50 Winery Brochures to Paseo del Sol for distribution to prospective home buyers. · 50 Old Town Maps to the Long Beach Police Officers Association visiting Temecula. · 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Relocation Packets to Church of Latter Day Saints for distribution to new residents. · 50 Winery Brochures to California Association of Legal Secretary's for distribution at a conference in Temecula · 30 City with a Vision, 30 Old Town Maps, 30 Temecula Brochures and 30 Visitor Guides to Pierson's Country Place for distribution to guests. · 30 Old Town Maps, 30 Visitor Guides and 30 Winery Brochures to Rancon Real Estate for distribution to foreign exchange students visiting Temecula. · 25 Winery Brochures to M.V.P. Limousine & Ground Transportation for distribution to clients. Activity Report · Overall Tourism phone calls arc up 15.74 percent from last year. · Overall phone calls are up 22.58 percent from last year. · Walk-ins are up 42.35 percent from last year. E-Mail requests: 66 The Chamber is currently working with Fire Rose Communications to publish the Temecula Today newsletter. We will conduct informal focus groups to research and determine what is effective and to solicit suggestions for future articles. Also attached are the Meeting Minutes for the Tourism, Education, Ways & Means, Local Business Promotions, Govemment Action, Membership Committees and "How did you hear about Temecula?" report. If you have any question regarding this information, please feel flee to call me. Thank you. Mayor St~v~n J. Ford Mayor Pro Tern Jeff~ry E. Stone Councilman Jeff Com~rch~r0 Councilman Karel F. Lindemans Councilman Ronald H. Roberrs 8hawn N~lson, City Manager ~im O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MAY, '1999 PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month 384 89 434 924 1,831 Total Year-To-Date 2334 566 3865 5,353 12,118 RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS CHAMBER REFERRALS 155 62 1,499 117 3,664 10,742 1110 305 8,976 635 11,026 57,780 WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS 123 79 81 615 151 59 665 47 1,820 275 8 0 133 3 0 3 0 422 1,607 594 401 3,890 887 283 4,605 312 12,579 MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS 120 91 92 303 931 531 568 2,030 E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL 11 8 47 66 92 92 277 461 GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL THIS MONTH 3,664 1,820 3O3 66 YEAR-TO-DATE 59,652 8,783 1,601 555 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber May, 1998 Chamber May, 1999 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 316 384 21.52 Calendar of Events 72 89 23.61 Special Events 254 434 70.87 General Information 940 924 -1.70 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,582 1,831 15.74 RELOCATION 127 155 22.05 DEMOGRAPHICS 41 62 51.22 CHAMBER 1,155 1,499 29.78 MISCELLANEOUS 84 117 39.29 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 2,989 3,664 22.58 CHAMBER REFERRALS 5,506 10,742 95.10 WALK-INS TOURISM 71 123 73.24 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 49 79 61.22 SPECIAL EVENTS 26 81 211.54 GENERAL INFORMATION 309 615 99.03 RELOCATION 96 151 57.29 DEMOGRAPHICS 31 59 90.32 CHAMBER 685 665 -2.92 MISCELLANEOUS 19 47 147.37 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 289 422 46.02 TOTAL WALK-INS 1,575 2,242 42.35 MAILINGS TOURISM 100 120 20.00 RELOCATION 109 91 -16.51 DEMOGRAPHICS 84 92 9.52 TOTAL MAILINGS 293 303 3.41 E-MAIL TOURISM N/A 11 N/A RELOCATION N/A 8 N/A MISCELLANEOUS N/A 47 N/A TOTAL E-MAIL 66 N/A * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT May 1999 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Judi Staats, Treasurer; Steve Phelps, Secretary; Brian Padberg, Shed Davis, and Penny Rivera. The Business of the Film Council Preparations for the Temecula Talent Showcase '99 are being completed. Over 300 tickets will be sold by the contestants. We have chosen 30 entrants from all over the Inland Empire, mostly from the Temecula area. Mayor Ford will be one of six judges for the event which will be presented on June 12th in the CRC as part of the Arts Council's Arts in the Country- Arts Fest '99. Film Council and Film Festival have been combined to one location by call forwarding. Maggi Allen is working with the Film Festival staff and is still directing all calls to the proper channels. We have received 14 specific location calls this month and innumerable festival inquiries. Filming activity · Doyon Townsend Enterprises produced a 30-second promo/commercial for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival, which is currently being aired on TCI's cable network. Several local farms with wooden bams were photographed for consideration in the upcoming Amway calendar. The Amway photographer spent the weekend at Temecula Creek Inn and will retum for the Film Festival. Cinema Entertainment Alliance is progressing in their production of the Film Festival. Over 120 Temecula and area residents have attended volunteer meetings and will actively work the festival. There will be over 120 films shown at the festival including a 75th Anniversary retrospective of MGM films. Over 170 filmmakers and film production people are confirmed to be in attendance, including 7 from Australia. Members of Film Council are participating festival activities by producing filmmaker "Welcome" packets include the NEW Chamber of Commerce map of Temecula and tourism brochures and the Film Council's Production Guide of local businesses and services. A Poker Run Hot Rod rally has been arranged for the filmmakers on June 19th following the Great Race stop. Filmmakers will be driven through Temecula for fun and will be shown some of our excellent photo location spot at the same time. Maps will be distributed so that if they see something they like, th4ey will know how to find it again. Still photos were taken in the De Luz are and will be used for automotive magazine advertising. 17 people stayed in local hotels for the shoot. · A music video was shot in Lake Elsinore. We are waiting for production information. We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses PLEASE JOIN US AT THE FILM FESTIVAL. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC LI trips Some 20 miles Inland from !he Pacific Ocean, Teeecula's M3d'l .... ,c . dimale and rolling h!lb are dotted by vineyank Here, some 13 wineries, from French chateau to hacienda in styJe, offer opportunities for wine tasting, a tour or picnic. Story by Patricia Kime In spring and summer, early morning fog enshrouds Temecula, a white mist from the sea that pours past Camp Pendleton and the avocado orchards of Fallbrook into this valley of vineyards. Enveloping ~he town in a moist embrace, the heavy skies often keep people indoors while they work magic on the grapes· For it is this cloudy, wet kiss that enables Temecula to be Southem Calffomia's largest wine-growin8 region, and, consequently, one of its most popular tourist draws. The Indians called it "Temeku,' (trans- lated as 'the land where the sun shines through the white mist) and for visitors, it is Southern California's answer to Napa Valley. With 13 wineries, numerous bed and breakfast inns and a charming Old Town CUSTOM LOOK...AFFORDABLE PRICE Services for the "IRED {!USA NATHAN BELLOWS : M.A. AUDIOLOGIST : LICENSED HEARING AID DISPENSER .LA Quality produc. ts personal service, 39-000 Bob Hope Dr. Probst Bldg. #202, [hncho Hitage · 81-880 Dr. Carreon BIrd. C 104, Indio next b.i~ iune 1999 Serving the desert for over 20 years. The valley's finest selection of pre-owned luxury vehicles. ROLLS-ROYCE · BENTLEY · JAGUAR EXOTIC. CLASSICS · MBZ iIiII · · I I 778-5444 * Fax 778-5440 CONCRETE COATINGS Decorative & Durable Proven Products & Methods lO-year warranty program "Bringing Design & Beauty to Concrete" CLEAN & RENEW Concrete '-':'~.':..,. Kool Deck " ,.~ ,2-.. *-' Patio, Pool Deck Walkway Entry Driveway "':-_~ ,. ' ., .~ - EMRICK EWELS PRIVATE CONSIGNMENT & ESTATE JEWELRY Rick & Emma Essman 73-896 El Paseo · Palm Desert (Between San Luis Rey and Portola, 5 doors east of Bank of America) 568-4522 Tues-Sat 10:00-5:30 pm ~ ~ ~ area, Temecula offers all the romance and excitement of a large wine region without the hefty price of an airline ticket north or to France. Less than two hours From downtown Palm Springs, visitors enjoy verdant hills, tasting rooms and cozy accommodations similar to those Found in Northern California. The Temecula area has been producing wines since the late 1960s. More than 28 varieties of grapes are grown here, and more than 5 million bottles of wine are produced annually. In the Temecula viiiculture area, as wine grape growing areas are k2~own, 1,800 acres of vines produce award-winning chardon- nays and sauvignon blancs, as wei1 as caber- net sauvignons, meriots and sangioveses. Temecula offers all the romance and excitement of a large wine region without the hefty price of an airline ticket north or to France. Oenophfies can sample the area's boLu~ty in tasting rooms and at picnic tables over- lookin8 the vineyards. All wineries offer tastings either for free or at a nominal charge and most also sell gourmet deli- catessen items as accoutrements. No need to bring a lunch From home and most wineries aiso offer tours of their facilities. These sneak peeks lend an exce]- lent perspective of the work that is ]irerally poured into a wine bottle. Throughout the year, tour guides show and demonstrate the wine-making process, from planting and nurturin8 the grapes to harvesting, to crushin8, fermenting and bottlin8. But the fluits of this scenic town aren't limited only to 8rapes. Temecula is known throughout the Southland as an antiques destination. Dozens of antique stores and emporiums line the Old Town area in its Old West setting. And thanks to a recent $5 million renovation, shoppers can now hunt For everythin8 From antique clocks to McDonald's Happy Meal collectibles while s~roIlin8 down wooden sidewalks past handsome arches and gas lamps. Romantics may even pause for an impromptu dance to the western music that is now piped throughout the downtown area, Temecuia i~ a cooling day trip from CUSTOM ACRYLIC Visit our 5,000 sq. ft. showroom loca~::i:=~!!~i~ 69-930 Hwy. ! 11, Rancho ·Mirage, CA crcatc custom CLASSICS 770- Elegante Jewelry Mfg. Co. Palm Desert 73-330 El Paseo, Suite A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 760-346-8535 Max and Eva Baur. Retired. Seven /4randchildren. Golf. Gardrning. l ?avd. Gave their vacuum cleaner to charity. $10.00 OFF first visit only 340-0205 Irvine area 714-752-7570 www. merrymaids.com thanks/ Old Town Temecula, a favorite stop for present day shoppers, was born in 1882, when the Santa Fe railroad came through the valley. the valley. At an altitude of 1,500 feet, i['s climate is milder than the valley's, and it benefits ~'om the neazby sea breezes. That's not to say it doesn't get hot. But the wine- tasting rooms and their crisp, rlavorful offer- ings can easily soothe sweltering souls. Temecula is an excellent and accessi- ble weekend destination for those to the east, south or north. Visitors who want to stay overnight, however, should choose a hotel dose to the wineries (alon8 gancho California Road), because this city, in addi- tion to being a tourist hot-spot, is a resi- dential boomtog and traffic is often busy. A few of the nearby hotels are the Loma Vista Bed & Breald'ast, the Butterfield Inn and the Embassy Suites Hotel. The Temecula Creek Inn is a short drive away on Rainbow Canyon Road, and offers a 27-hole championship golf course and wine and golf packages. On June 19, vintage cars pour into Old Town as part of the Great Race. a cross- country compefiL-ion that starts in Georgia. Other special events include the city's famous Balloon Festival, which took place May 1-2, barrel tastings in March, m'~d rm'v domly scheduled wine and food tastings. The city's varied options make decision- making easier to tailor to individual pref- erence. It's likely the only difficult deci- sions to be made are choosing which wineries to visit and who will serve as des- ignated driver. If the budget allows, consider hiring a limousine from Cloud Nine, that will per- mita visit to al of the wineries. None of the n'aveling party will feel excluded, and driving difficulties disappear with the fog- either the real mist that nurtures the grapes or the physic~_l one stemming from too many wine tastings. Several of the area's limousine compa- nies offer wine touring packages. Hourly rates range from $35 per couple at MPV to $54 for an eight passenger limousine from Cloud Nine. Many of the limousines fea- ture fully stocked bars, complimentary drinks and drivers knowledgeable of Temecula wine country. · Guidebook: Getting There: Debate rages in the desert cities over which is the fastest way to Temecula and Interstate 15. It is roughly a two-hour drive from downtown Palm Springs. Option 1: Take Interstate 10 West to Highway 60; fol- low Hwy. 60 West to Interstate 215 South. Temecula is the exit after the merge between 1-215 and 1-15. Option 2: Take I-10 to Hwy. 79 in Banning. Turn South on Hwy. 79. In Hemet, take Hwy. 74 West, until you see signs for Temecula and Hwy. 79 again. Head south. For a scenic route, take Hwy. 74 from Palm Desert to Hwy. 371. Follow Hwy. 371 to Aguanga. In Aguanga, turn west on Hwy. 79, which takes you to Temecula. When to go: Any time of the year is good, although on late summer evenings, lucky visitors can catch the harvest. Information: The Temecula Chamber of Commerce, (909) 676-5090 or the Temecula Valley Vintner's Association (909) 699-3626. Hints: · Arrive at the wineries in style and don't worry about having a designated driver. Hire a limousine for a day-long tour of the wineries. · Catch Vintage Cars at the Great Race in Old Town Temecula on June 19. · Bring along a picnic blanket and buy some fine cheeses and gourmet items at winery delis. Plan to picnic in the vine- yards, savoring the flavor of Temecula. Patricia Kime is a free_lance journalist based in Twentynine Palms. Her e-mail address is ckime@thegrid. net Whatever subject we teach, success is learned. At Sylvan, we do more than help kids who have fallen behind in school. We also help kids who are doing well in school reach their potential. We have accelerated programs that improve proficiency in reading and math, plus programs that build good study skills and habits. For academic and personal success tomorrow, call Sylvan today. SYLVAN LEARNING CENTER' Success is learned." www.educate.com © 1998 Sylvan Learrfing Syru~ms, Inc. Best Buy/Cost Plus Center 44-429 Town Center Way, Suite A Palm Desert, CA 92260 760-836-3300 READING WRITING MATH SAT'/ACT STUDY SKILLS COURSES FOR CREDIT Father's Day LIFT CHAIR SALE Large Stock.t · Great Slection.t Give the gift of independence with a beautiful Pride lift chair from ealth pment entre Reg. $1195.00-Now 895.00 Reg. $695.00-Now 525.00 Hours: M-F 8am to 5pm, Sat 9am to 1 pm Pride m,cRou e 760-345-2537 Hea/~l next june 1999 The # 1 Source for Corporate www.busfac.c0m SE ~1I Who you choose to help this important decision is key to your project's success. SELECT!NG A SITE FOR THE B~OTECH {NDUSTRY By Dor~atd L, Hemy :'--.. "W e are a research- based industry developing innova- tive products to address widespread unmet medical needs," says Carl B. Feldbaum, president of the Biotechnology Industry Organiza- tion (BIO), Washington, DC. BIO represents more than 850 biotech- nology companies, academic insti- U .S.-BASED BAXTER INTERNATIONAL IS A GLOBAL MANUFACTURER OF PERITONEAL DtALYSlS (PD) SOLUTIONS, WHICH ARE SELF-ADMINISTERED BY RENAL-DISEASE PATIENTS. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURES PD SOLUTIONS IN JAPAN, SINGAPORE, AND CHINA FOR THE FAST-GROWING ASIAN MARKET. B-2 AN ADVERTISING SECTION FOR BUSINESS FACILITIES/BIOPHARM tutions and state biotechnology centers in 47 states and 26 nations. BIO members are involved in the research and development of med- ical, agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products. "Biotechnology is pro- viding both the tools to produce the next generation of medicines as well as the final products. These represent enormous and expand- ing markets," he adds. To capture the opportunity to par- ticipate in the growth of the dynamic biotech industry, communities across the nation are eagerly working to convince those of you in the biotech industry that locations in their area offer the best resources for growth. And why the surge of interest in biotech growth? Feldbaum explains: "Biotechnology leads in medical in- novation because of our industry's BIOTECH EXPANSION STRATEGIES willingness to attempt to solve the difficult problems, to confront the most intractable, often life-threaten- ing diseases. With our fast-develop- ing knowledge of the genetic causes AN EDUCATED, SKILLED WORKFORCE IS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE BIOTECH INDUSTRY'S CONTINUED SUCCESS. of disease, and with new discoveries being made virtually every day, we believe biotech will continue to pro- duce medical breakthroughs. "In the past four years, 76 new biotechnology drugs, vaccines, and new indications have been ap- proved," continues Feldbaum. "This is a significant increase over the previous 14 years. In 1998, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved new biotechnolo- gy medicines for acute coronary syndrome, arthritis, breast cancer, Crohn's disease, and for the pre- vention of Lyme disease." Many communities are investing in the labor training programs, and the research and educational amenities that the biotech industry desperately needs to keep moving at the cutting edge of technology. Patrick M. Kelly, director of state government relations at glO, says: "Research centers are one of the more important factors attract- ing biotech companies. Where a lot of research resources are pre- sent, you see biotech industry clus- ters. California, the number-one biotech state, and Massachusetts, the second ranked biotech state, encourage the tremendous clusters of biotech companies surrounding the research institutions. And there is a six-way race for third place in the number and activity of biotech firms with Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington in a hotly contested race with Texas, Florida, and New Jersey." Biotech companies are listening to the overtures of communities across the nation with offers of technology transfers, research sup- port, lower operating costs, skilled professionals, good transportation without excessive gridlock, im- proved quality of life, and lower cost of living factors. BIOTECH GROWTH Phoenix, AZ has long been known as a hotbed of high-tech ac- tivity, including biotech operations. A rapidly growing biotech industry includes a cluster of nearly 80 firms, according to a study conducted at the University of Arizona. Biotech- nology in Arizona is a young indus- try, with three-quarters of all the biotech firms having been rounded since 1980. Biomedical devices are the leading products of these firms, followed by pharmaceuticals and industrial products. Thanks to the region's favorable business climate, you wdl discover a strong educational system, ad- vanced fiber-optics communications network, and an excellent trans- portation system. The high-tech- nology, biotech industry has grown rapidly throughout the Greater Phoenix region. An important requirement for the biotech industry's continued success is an educated workforce. In the Greater Phoenix area, Ari- zona State University ful~lled that mission with the establishment of a College of Technology. In addition, many of the area's community col- leges offer two-year degrees focused on the high-tech field. Two of Phoenix's major employers, Mo- torola and Intel, have donated mil- lions of dollars worth of equipment to the schools to set up simulated manufacturing operations and train students for high-tech jobs. One of the halhnarks of a growing industry, such as biotechnology, is the demand for additional space. And, the biotech industry is explod- ing with growth and enormous po- tential in the Washington/Baltimore area, where nearly 300 companies are involved in R&D and biotech manufacturing. Biotechnology is im- portant to Maryland, and biotech- nology is important to the world. In fact, Maryland has become one of the world's centers of excellence in biotech research. In 1997, Maryland biotech companies churned out more than $2 billion in revenues. This g. THE ABILITY TO ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT CLEAN ROOM IS A SIIE SELECTION FACIOR FOR MOST BIOTECH FIRMS. industry represents a new way of doing business in Maryland and will be a significant part of the state's economy for the next decade. Maryland enjoys the third largest concentration of bioscience compa- nies in the United States, according to the Maryland Department of Busi- BIOTECH ness& Economic Development. In the biotech fields, Maryland univer- sities during the past three years received 121 patents, government agencies with Maryland facilities received 307, and private firms re- ce~ved 212. With this influx of R&D patents, Maryland has developed an R&D center of excellence that at- tracts additional biotech operations. Medlmmune, Inc., a Maryland- based biotech company, recently had its third product approved by the FDA. Dr- Wayne Hockmeyer, ~ ~ .'. '~i,( g!ii::~:'- .... :- are optimistic about the future and want to continue to grow our busi- ness here in Maryland." As a result of the substantial biomedical and federal government infrastructure, biotechnolog~/is a natural industry for Maryland, according to H¢,ckmeyer. Because of this infrastructure, attracting the best talent is not difficult. In the summer of 1998, Human Genome Sciences (HGS), head- quartered in Montgomery County, MD, chose a site for its new produe- Ik CLUSTERS Of BIOTECH COMPANIES OCCUR WHERE RESEARCH RESOURCES ARE READILY AVAILABLE. ACCESS TO THESE SOURCES OF INFORMATION IS OFTEN HIGH ON THE LIST OF PRIORITIES DURING THE SiTE SEARCH. chairman and CEO, says that Med- Immune is on its way to becoming profitable. The company does its own R&D, process development, clinical research, sales and market- ing, and manufacturing. Located in Gaithersburg, the company recently completed construction of a $50 million, 91,000-square- foot manufacturing facility in Frederick. Says Hockmeyer, "We tion facilify in the Johns Hopkins Belward Research Campus in Rockville, not far from its current lab and office spaces in the Shady Grove Life Sciences Center. The company recently made a business decision to grow from a R&D-only firm to production. The new facili- ty will be located on a 13-acre site and include 80,000 square feet of space for pilot production of thera- peutic proteins and for process development and scale-up. The site also allows for future expansion. The stale of Maryland and Montgomery County offered tax credits, grants for job creation, in- frastructure improvements, and a low-interest loan. Johns Hopkins donated 30 acres of land .to Mont- gomery County, which then sold the 13-acre site to the Montgomery County Economic Development Corp. (MEDCO), which then leased the site to HGS for 20 years. ATTRACTING BIOTECH FIRMS The availability of skilled, edu- cated people is one of the keys to locating a biotech firm. California, of course, has an immense power- house of biotech firms operating within the state. California's Bay Area (San Francisco) is regarded by many as the birthplace of biotechnology and remains a world leader in core biotechnology indus- tries with nearly 1,000 firlns and research institutes. The Bay Area is home to one of the first biotech- nology companies--Genentech. "Certainly high technology has been a key driver in California's growth. Many of these coLnpanies have made a renewed commitment to California with an eye toward long-term expansion," says a spokesperson with the California Trade and Commerce Agency and Team California. The Greater Sacramento area in Northern California offers a superior quality of life and appeals to the re- search needs of biotech firins. A leading biological science research facility, University of California, Davis, forms the core of the research needs for the biotech industry in the region. Says Raymond L. Rodriguez, president at Applied Phyrelegics: "The university has been very coop- erative in giving me the freedom to (Continued on page B- 1 O) BIOTECH EXPANSION STRATEGIES (Continued from page B-8) develop my own private venture in the area of biopharmaceuticals and nutritional products. The most im- portant factors contributing to the success of my company have been the skillful handling of patents and licensing by the University, and a regulatory climate in the state that promotes business development." The growing biotech industry at the gateway to California's biotech corridor in Woodland, CA has a trained workforce that is ready to add new dimensions to the biotech research. Already Seminis, employ- ing more than 180 people on a 72- acre site, operates a worldwide biotech research headquarters, focusing on plant research in Woodland. What's more, Hygiela Biological Laboratories of Wood- land received national awards for the biotech research that resulted in a new vaccine designed to pre- vent a major disease of dairy cows. Founded in 1991, Hygiela has grown from 8 employees in 1997 to 15 employees in 1998. Woodland, located 15 m~les northwest of Sacramento on U.S. Interstate 5, offers a unique ~ppor- tunity for a biotech company with growth in mind as a result of a cor- porate consolidation. Bryce Birk- man, executive director at the Woodland Economic Renaissance Corporation explains that one firm relocated an operation in a consoli- dation move that freed up a superi- or biotech site, which would rank high on most any site selection checklist, and is a great location for biotech operations. On five acres of land, an established facility sits vacant, ready for occupancy. The 38,700-square-foot biotechnology lab and pilot plant offers clean room operations, R&D space, warehous- ing, and plant processing space at the Woodland site. The regional workforce of 17,500 people includes well-trained scientists, engineers, and skilled technicians. UC Davis, which is less than 10 miles away, has nearly 4,000 undergraduates study- ing biological sciences. What's more, UC Davis has an Interdisci- plinary Biotech division with more than 400 affiliated professors and more than 300 funded and ongoing research projects. In Los Angeles, the biomed in- dustry is gathering momentum. A good example is Alfred E. Mann's $100 million-each contribution to support biomedical research at the University of Southern California and at the University of California, Los Angeles. The commitment to support biomed and biotech firms heart-bypass surgery, spurred a $16 million expansion at the Temecula, CA complex of five buildings with 500,000 square feet of space, includ- ing a four-story main facility. The ex- pansion will add 300 employees in 1999 at the four-story production plant that operates around the clock. Guidant Corporation, an Indiana- headquartered company, employs more than 5,000 people worldwide, with 2,000 in Temecula, CA. Since 1997, rapid growth has resulted in nearly doubling the employment in Temecula. By mid-year, Guidant plans to open a factory in Ireland that will handle European orders. And the reason for this success? Research and development invest- THE RANCHO SAN ANTONIO MEDICAL CENTER IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. is further illustrated in the planned California State University North- ridge, MiniMed Business Park, which will house a state-of-the-art bioscience facility. In addition, the Southern California Biomedical Council is organizing its second annual Biomed Venture Forum. In November 1998, Guidant Cor- poration introduced a new product that doctors worldwide are now us- ing. In fact the new product, a heart "stent" that offers an alternate to ment plays a major factor, says Bob Larson, vice president of operations. Guidant, like many biotech firn~s, must always be inventing and pro- ducing new products. According to Larson, part of the company's success rises from corporate policy that de- crees 16% of profits are to be plowed into research and development. Employee training is another factor. Each employee, including every part- time worker, is given about 53 hours of specialized training. D 111 ^..A ............ ~ ........... BIOTECH Why Temecula? The company founder, Bob Reese, in 1983 visited his parents in Temecula. He liked the Temecula Valley and recom- mended a plant he set up in the area. The quality of life factor was perhaps the most significant mt~ti- vation that created the start-up ior busiil ss success. !1 your business is... searchin~ for ihe besl way Io ensure heallhy proIlls, sleady ~rowlh and maximum ion~evily, choosinl! Rancho Cucamenea as your business localion may be jusl whal the declot ordered. ~s you consider how you an Improve your comlmny's weil-bein~ boin now and in ihe Ininre, consider. lhese Incis cucamonga: Number 4 on "Ou~ook lisi of 30 besl allies business and lease prices proiessiona] ucamonga and rail lines lax rules on ,~,~e~,.d.alnlon~ltqu~e!b. pmenl ,AgeHCF Your Prescription for Success! Write 688 on Information Card eration that now has grown into a 2,0000 employee complex. Strategically located on South- ern California's znain inland high- way, Interstate-15, Temecula gains the benefits of free-flowing com- mercial and residential access fi'om a central location along the 1 - 15/l- 215 freeway corridor. As a master- planned con~munity, the 97,000- acre Temecula region gains high marks for the quality of life factor. "Research centers are one of the more important factors attracting biotech companies. Where a lot of research resources are present, you see biotech clusters. California, the number-one biotech state, and Massachusetts, the second ranked biotech state, encourage the tremendous clusters of biotech companies surrounding the research institutions." Patrick M. Kelly, Director cd' Stale Government Relatilms Bi<~technl~hgy hkh~stry L)rgtmization ( BIC) ) Companies from a variety of indus- tries are cht~osing to locate in Temecula because of its quality of life, amot~g other site selectiota fac- tors crucial to any kind of conq3any needing a new facility. "Temect~la's central Southern California lt~cati~H~ and multiple freeway access was perfect for us," Finding The Right Site For Your Business Is Now As S imp 1 e As B lack And Sure, we could give you a bunch of pretty pictures to show what a great tom Palmdale is. But really ..... Are you going to make a business decision on pictures? What you need are facts. Cold, hard, bottom-line facts. And those we've got plenty of. Like an Enterprise Zone dmn can provide you with as much as $26,OOO per employee. A Foreign Trade Zone that can save you on irnt~rt and export duties. And a business-friendly environment that understands you just want to get down to business. Call today and let us give you the facts you need. Palmdale CALIFORNIA 1-877-GRO HERE 1-877-476-4373 BIOTECH EXPANSION STRATEII!I~S MORE IHAN 2,000 WORKERS AI GUIDANI CORP.'S IEMECULA, CA PLANI PRODUCE PRODUelS USED BY HEARI SURGEONS WORLDWIDE. JN 1999, GU~DANT WiLL SPEND $16 MILLION 10 RENOVAIE THE 575,000-SQUARE-FOOl PaUl, AUDING 350 FIJL[~IIME JOBS. says Scott Meer, manager of ground operations at Federal Express, which recently chose to locate in Temecula. "Our employees love the area and are involved in communi- ty activities." What's more, a well-educated workforce provides the biotech com- panies with a quality labor pool which is a major factor for Chemi- con International, another biotech firm, which has been in Temecula since 1981. Chemicon's Temecula facility consists of 30,000 square feet and contains production, R&D, lo- gistics, and marketing operations. The City of Palmdale, located 60 miles from Los Angeles, is one of the fastest growing cities in the U.S. with an estimated population of 118,265. High-tech and related biotech operations have con- tributed to building a strong labor pool with diverse qualifications that attracts still more high-tech, biotech companies. In August 1998, Senior Systems Technology, Inc. began operations in a new, $6.8 million, 130,000-square-foot facility in Pahndale. In addition an electronic switch and gauge manu- facturer, Murphy's Safety Switch Company, is building a new $1.6 million facility in Palmdale. Rancho Cucamonga, population 116,000, is one of Southern Cali- fornia's most family oriented and prosperous communities. The city's location at the 1-10 and 1-15 free- way junction is one of the princi- pal advantages. Firms are moving to this area of the Inland Empire to build modern facilities featuring competitive costs and strong logis- tics infrastructure. From 1991 to 1996, Rancho Cucamonga added 442 firms to reach 2,188. Although certain site selection factors are specific to biotech com- panies (the type of workforce avail- able in the region, for example) there are certain factors that are cru- cial to any site search, no matter what the industry. Rancho Cuca- monga offers a convenient location for almost any type of industry, thanks to its pro-business climate. In 1999, Aetna U.S. Healthcare will move into a building at an idled mis- sile manufacturing plant in Rancho Cucamonga, bringing along 185 jobs. Jerrylyn Romana, western re- gional facilities manager, says that three primary factors make the loca- tion appealing: access to the Ontario International Airport to shuttle be- tween headquarters in San Ramon and the new location; attractive leasing arrangements; and ample space for expansion. STATES TARGET BIOTECHNOLOGY More and more, states are rec- ognizing the role the biotechnolo- gy industry plays in their economies. BIO announced this April that Tennessee has become the 25th state to form a biotech- nology association representing companies and academic institutes involved in biomedical research and product development. The Tennessee Biotechnology Association (TBA) was launched THE QUEST FOR THE TOP TALENT IN BIOTECHNOLOGY IS OFTEN ADVANCED WITH OUTSTANDING QUALITY OF LIFE FACTORS. BIOTECH EXPANSION STRATEGIEg during the 2nd Annual Tennessee Biomedical Engineering Confer- ence at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. Joseph Gregory, vice chairman of King Pharmaceuticals in Bristol, TN, will chair the new state association. "We are very excited to have such an enthusiastic, statewide commitment to improving opportu- nities for biotechnology and bio- medical research and development in the state," says Gregory. "We have received numerous funding commitments including a pledge for first-year matching funds from the Tennessee Technology Develop- ment Corp." The Tennessee Technology Development Corp., formed last year by the state's Department of Economic and Community Develop- ment, has committed up to $50,000 in matching funds to assist the TBA. The association will function in support of Tennessee companies, academic institutes and centers of excellence conducting research and development in biotechnology products, pharmaceuticals and med- ical devices. In addition to Gregory, other TBA board officers include Dennis Grimaud, president; Larry Evans, treasurer; and James McElroy, sec- retary. Grimaud is president and CEO of Cytornetry Associates, in Nashville. Evans is a partner with the accounting firm, Pricewater- houseCoopers, in Nashville. McEI- roy is a partner with the law firm, Baker Done'lson Bearman and Caldwell, in Nashville. "We look forward to working closely with the Tennessee Biotech- nology Association," says BIO's Patrick Kelly. "We are impressed with the substantial R&D infra- structure already in place in the state and we anticipate that the as- sociation will further improve the climate for biotechnology compa- AN ADVERTISING SECTION FOR BUSIHESS FACILITIES/BIO PFIARM B-15 0 c 8 mmt Write 813 on Information Card BIOTECH nies in Tennessee. The TBA joins a growing network of state biotech- nology associations affiliated with BIO. There are now 25 state biotechnology associations and all of them play pivotal roles in sup- porting the growth of the biotech- nology industry." FINANCIAL INCENTIVES Financial incentives and research support were the major considera- tions that placed ZymeTx, Inc., a biotech company developing med- ical products, in Oklahoma. The company was established through the research support of the Okla- homa Medical Research Foundation (OMRF). ZymeTx benefits from an ongoing relationship with OMRF, which provides the company with CHEMICON'S TEMECULA FACILITY CONSISTS OF 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR PRODUCTION, R&D, LOGISTICS, AND MARKETING OPERAlIONS. access to R&D resources rivaling those of much larger biotech compa- nies. OMRF provides ZymeTx with extensive scientific expertise, which supplement the company's own dedi- cated facility and staff. This relation- ship opens the doors to a number of ...Located in the "RANS ORTATION o RLA31GLE" DAY1' ~ ~ENiA,~~~ ~; to developed industrial adjacent to 4-lane U.S. 35, minutes to (3) interstate highways. N . . . A , d ~ C~An dependable, productive labor force. OHIO City o. f Hospitality ommunity committed to C excellence - in Education, Health Care, Recreation and the overall quality of life. XENL ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION .4,...," ~'~",;~181 W. Main Street · Xenia, Ohio · USA 45385 (;_) Ph: (937) 372-6389 · Fax: (937) 372-3509 1-800-GO-XENIA ~.,,o,e E-Mail: xegcgci.xenia.oh.us · Web: www. XEGC.org Write 803 on Information Card promising technologies that will yield additional new product candi- dates in the future. Says Peter Livingston, CEO, "Our scientific and research staff maintains a close professional rela- tionship with the Oklahoma Med- ical Research Foundation. ZymeTx is able to work with scientists at OMRF with critical access to research and development capabil- ities that rival those found at much larger biotechnology companies." Michigan is a major player in biotechnology with the recently cre- ated Van Andel Research Institute in Grand Rapids. The $1 billion en- dowed institute is expected to be a big attraction for the biotech and pharmaceutical companies looking for cutting-edge facilities and finan- cial backing. Traditionally, universities have been thought of as the site for the majority of basic biotech research. Individual professors who direct research laboratories manned by teams of graduate students and post- doctorates have been the foundation for a great deal of scientific progress. Today the organization of university departments is more complex, fund- ing sources are more diverse, and interdisciplinary collaboration has become the norm. The growing number of biotech firms in Michigan exceeds 140 com- panies with 19,000 workers. Some of the major firms in biotechnology operating in Michigan include: Aas- trom, C&M Pharmacal, Caraco, Detrex, Neogen, Perrigo, Trinity Technologies, Vortech Pharmaceu- ticals, and Welch Laboratories. In addition, major pharmaceutical companies have facilities in the state as well, including Parke-Davis and Pharmacia & Upjohn. The Michigan Economic Devel- opment Corporation, an alliance between the state of Michigan and several local communities, is your BIOTECH F_]~PANSION ~ATE61~-~ one-stop resource for expansion and relocation projects. Combined with site development and job training incentives, Michigan offers your biotech operation an economic advantage. Moreover, the Michigan Technical Education Centers, a state-of-the-art network of schools, provides customized training. In November 1998, Scott Tech- nologies announced an expansion in South Haven, MI. Says Gover- nor John Engler, "This project, with over 150 new jobs and an in- vestment of $1 million, will locate in Michigan not Indiana. Projects like this are why Michigan will continue to keep its number one status as the state with the most new projects and expansions." Scott Technologies received a tax credit worth an estimated $391,000 from the Michigan Economic Growth Authority. The new facility will be operational later in 1999. The Scott Technologies project will provide more than $5.4 million in revenue to the state over the life of the tax credit agreement, resulting in a net positive gain to the state of $5 million after the MEGA credit. What's more, the project is expected to generate more than $68 million in personal income. Venture capital funding was a sig- nificant factor for Copernicus Gene Systems, Inc., a Cleveland, OH biotechnology start-up company. Several venture capital organiza- tions considered Cleveland an unlikely location for innovative biotech growth, but the city leaders decided to change Cleveland's tech- nological support and lure this industry to the region. Copernicus, faundad in 1994 and based on gene therapy technology developed at Cleveland's Case Western Reserve University, secured $4.6 million from four different investors in December 1997. In addition, the company received a $100,000 SBIR Pack your And move to Cleveland. Your biamedico comp .y in st Ohio will have plenty of company. That includes over 100 other biotechnolagy and medical products firms. More than 100 research laboratories. Scores of incubator facilities and technology transfer centers, including The Edison BioTechnology Center. Twenty hospital systems -- many with a medical school affiliation -- employing 56,000 people. And more. Ah, but what about a~r work? Today's Cleveland truly shines. With a revitalized downtown, creative restaurants, accessible bating, professional sports, world- class theater, renowned museums and many other cultural amenities. Best of all, it's all affordable, thanks to a cost of living that Boston, San Francisco, D.C. and most other major cities can't beat. .~/i~,-7 So pack up and check out Cleveland. Ell II ~tL~ ~11~.I~I l] You'll be happily surprised. Guaranteed. ' Contact Jim Kroeger 1-888-304-GROW www. clevelandgrowth.com Write 465 on Information Card BIOTECH grant from the National Cancer Institute to test a new approach for treating liver cancer. The cash provides the resources to pursue development of the technology and add staff to complement the five full-time employees. Nestled 20 miles south of Miami, FL, Perrine-Cutler Ridge is one of Florida's premiere locations for biotech companies. Currently 10 biotech companies chose the Miami-Dade Biomedical Corridor at Perrine-Cutler for operations. Beckman-Coulter Corp., a world leader in laboratory diagnostics, invested $30 million in the Per- fine-Cutler Ridge area, creating a 100-acre corporate headquarters for global operations. Employing 1,800 people at the headquarters site, the company contin- ues to develop breakthrough products in the realm of blood cell analysis, as well as cancer and AIDS research. Swiss Caps, a European pharmaceutical company opened a production plant in 1992 to manu- facture nutritional supplements. And what makes Perrine-Cutler Ridge a hot location for biotech? Tax and financial incentives for biotech BIG TIME The Lehigh Valley inspires big thinking. Landmarks like the invention of the Transistor and cable IV. Innovation driven by new Tech- nologies lhrives in our region w,th 15,000 students attending our len world- class colleges and universities as well as th~e vocalional technical schools. Bradstreet are plugged into the Lehigh Valley business region. A cluster of 80 plastics companies has laken shape in the Lehigh Valley. Morn than 40 food and beverage companies such as Just Born~, Nestle, Coca-Cola~, and Perrier® have secured prime shelf space here. You might be surprised to hear how Future and current many other global Jeaders technology g~ants such ask~ have found Lehigh Valley, Questc)ne Decision Pennsylvania. Sciences, Lucent Contact us to dis- echno,og,es, utro.LehighVall,ey ......hat .....yother E I e c t r o n i c s, S r C companies have found in Technology, and Dun & E(011~ilUC our pan o( the world. DEVELOPIIEIII' COIPO RIIION ............ 6T0/266-~775 · 1-800-LV-1-SITE · fax: b10/266-7623 · emad: lvedc@JehiRhvalle,/.org internet: lehighvalleyorg ° PO Box 21750 ° Lehigh Valley, PA 18002 Write 146 on Information ~arct B-MLII AN ADVERTISING SECTION FOR BUSINESS FAClLITIES/BIOPHARM operations, a dynamic workforce, research support, excel- lent transportation from rail, truck, air, and ocean all contribute to biotech success. The eight colleges and uni- versities provide not only research resources, but also a trained labor pool for biotech operations. Explains Arthur Lyons, communications manager at Coulter Corporation: "We sell our products in more than 70 countries, so this is a great place from which to run our worldwide operations. Then, of course, near- by Miami is becoming more and more the capital of the Americas: there is a major airport and shipping lanes and an excellent pool of skilled, multi-cultural bilingual talent to draw upon." Lehigh Valley, PA, once dominated by large indus- trial firms, is now represented by a broad base of industries, including scientific biotech operations. To the East, the Lehigh Valley Industrial Park (LVIP) in Eastern Pennsylvania attracts biotech and high-tech firms such as NCR and General Electric. With five fully developed parks on 1,300 acres, LVIP offers many advantages for biotech firms. A new high-tech park will be available in 1999. The Lehigh Valley, located on the eastern border of Pennsylvania, contains a trio of cities--Allentown, Beth- lehem, and Easton--that are less than an hour's drive from Philadelphia and less than two hours from New York. The transportation infrastructure with easy access to other regions make the Lehigh Valley an excellent location for biotech distribution activities. The major factors that lead companies to choose Lehigh Valley include the skilled workforce and the potential for research. Among the Valley's educational assets are 10 colleges and universities, including Pennsyl- vania State University's Allentown campus and Lehigh University in Allentown. Xenia, OH, located in the "transportation triangle" formed by the three major interstate highways--Inter- states 70, 71, and 75--is 15 miles from Dayton. Because good transportation and cost-effective sites appeal to biotech site seekers, the convenient movement of peo- ple and products is a major asset for Xenia. A progres- sive, medium-sized city (population 25,000), Xenia is home to 64 widely diversified firms. A skilled workforce, good energy rates, excellent quality of life factors, and low-cost operations continue to attract auto-related investments to Xenia, OH. Biotech companies need their energy resources to be reliable even more so than high-tech firms. When deal- ing with materials such as living cells and organisms, it takes only a blackout of a few minutes to ruin months of research. GPU Energy is the largest electric utility in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and focuses on recruitment BIOTECH and expansion of customers within the regulated distribution territory. GPU's service area is home to 56 of the Fortune 500, and they have forged partnerships with developers in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. As site selection consultants, GPU pro- vides valuable services to the biotech firms in search of new facilities. Located southeast of Austin, Bas- trop, TX has all of the necessary in- gredients to become the next biotechnology cluster of Central Texas. Currently, Bastrop has two "Biotechnology leads in medical innovation because of our industry's willingness to attempt to solve the difficult problems, to confront the most intractable, often life- threatening diseases. With our fast-developing knowledge of the genetic causes of disease, and with new discoveries being made virtually every day, we believe biotech will continue to produce medical breakthroughs." Carl B. Fektbaum President Biotechnolo~' Industry.' Organization f BIO) nationally recognized biotechnology research facilities, both affiliated with the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The two facilities are the Science Park Cen- ter for Research on Environmental Disease and the Department of Vet- erinary Sciences. These two world- class facilities employ more than 300 people. Bastrop is also home for several major biotech companies. BloCrest Partners, a start-up company, has recently completed construction on a 45,000-square-foot facility west of Bastrop and will employ 150 peo- pie. International Rx Specialty WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA Affordable Land · MajorTranspodation Hub · Excellent Quality of Life · Available Workforce small town BIG POSSIBILITIES-;:"" Woodland is now a prime location for the expanding agricultural, biological, and medical technology industries. Located at the gateway of the new "Biotech Corridor" between the ::" Silicon Valley and Sacramento, Woodland k :, situated in California's agricultural heartland. Just fifteen minutes from ~ Sacramento, only eight miles from the " ~--.'~:-' prestigious University of California, Davis, a short 90 miles from San Francisco, and minutes away from international airline services and deep water ports, Woodland offers high tech companies a place to grow. Imagine the business possibilities! · Affordable land · Eager, affordable workforce for all job levels · Excellent training facilities · A business friendly environment · Small community living and big city access to education, entertainment and shopping. w ,~ ,,,/ 'Woodland ~,% s~,:,...,,e,toEconomic Renaissance ,~ Corporation Woodland...explore the business possibilities, call 530-661-4395 o Eraall: werc@afes.com o Web Address: woodlanderic. or8 Write 683 on Information Card AN ADVERTISING SECTION FOR BUSINESS FACILITIES]BIOPHARM B'~UI BIOTECH Company, a global wholesaler of pharmaceuticals, is located in Bastrop, and poised for expansion. "Regions with research centers at- tract the biotech organizations," explains BlO's Patrick Kelly. "Look for a cluster of research institutions and you will find a growing cluster of biotech companies." · F A X Interested in receiving free information on expanding or refocating your company? Just check the boxes below and fax your request to Sara Donadei at (732) 758-6634. Or calf (800) 524-0337. [] Bavaria, Germany Ad on page B-13 ~ Team California Ad on page B-3 ~ Greater Cleveland Growth Association, Ohio Ad on page B-17 [] GPU Energy, New Jersey & Pennsylvania Ad on page B-5 [] Lehigh Valley Economic Development Commission, Pennsylvania Ad on page B~18 7j Maryland Department of Business & Economic Development, Maryland Ad on page B-7 ~ Michigan Jobs Commission Ad on page B-9 L Midi-Pyrenees Expansion, France Ad on page B-15 Lj Oklahoma Department of Commerce, Oklahoma Ad on page B-11 ,j City of Palmdale, California Ad on page B-14 [] Perrine-Cutler Ridge, Florida Ad on page B-24 U Greater Phoenix, Arizona Ad on page B 21 L~ Rancho Cucamonga Economic Development Agency, California Ad on page B~]2 [] City of Temecula, California Ad on page B-23 [] Woodland Economic Renaissance Corporation, California Ad on page B-19 G Xenia Economic Growth, Ohio Ad on page B-16 Name Phone Number husmcss. qualitx in bill 111()%1 qualit) nn lift'. Boh l'ngn~an 'i .\ til\ ~[Ivn.' lhv ~:lq:i,~lunilit,s hn grln~lh nlc {is rit h ,is tho qtndit!. i}l lilt. (:a]l if', dt IF,,'-iF,)II ,',,ll(:l 'l \ nr V~VCB,.C}.It'II]L'LLI[d.la.tI', Write 820 on Information Card AN ADVERTISING SECTION FOR BUSINESS FACILITIES/BIOPHARM q:;pZ3 Iii -I III 0 Work, p lay and live in the:beautiful Temecula Valley.t Temecula. a 97,000-acre master-planned community, has emerged as a 'prime relocation destination for corporations, businesses and families. ReSidents enjoy a superb quality of life where living ~: serene and business comes .... · :.:.:to :.grow 'and prosper. ; ~::.:'i:..':. · The combination of a business-friendly envirgia.~;,:::2 booming economy, highly skilled workforce, ~ d4e fact that it's so easy to do business in Temecula have attached bio-medical. manufacturing 'a~d high-tech industries to this dymunic com.n. unity. National!~&,...gcognized companies including International Rectifie~'. Guidant. Professional Hospitalit)' Supply and Charmell Cormnercial have '.all found ~ Temecula an ideal elimate for expansion. ';~, '~'i., .· borhoods...~,:;. Clean air. attractive housing market. excellent schools and abundant business o iles make · ~ ~: =i Temecula:~ For more information 'and f~ company's expansion' . . .' . , '~' . ".~:'7):. . ,.,... ~,.....;.:....:-:: i~::~.'. ' ',,~ 'i~ ....... ""' ~'~" 9"'. j' '~'''' '$~" 432O0 P.O. Box June 14,1999 Southwest RiVerside County James B. O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589 RE: Activity Summary The following highlights the activities of the EDC during the month of May: Business Development The EDC responded to two requests for information from IEEP. A designer manufacturer would acquire a 95,000 sf facility for its Western United States Headquarters. The second response was for a metal roof panel manufacturing facility of 30,000 sf that would employ 25 to 30 people. Two requests could not be responded to as their requirements included heavy industrial zoning and large acreage with infrastructure in place. Demographic information was given to two local businesses that needed assistance with area growth projections. A health care prorider and an insurance company needed materials to provide to their corporate management departments for strategic planning. Also provided information on regional demographics and growth projections to residential homebuilder. Information concerning educational/trade opportunities was given to the Vintner's Association for distribution to its membership. Marketing Outreach Staats assisted faculty at Chapparal High School for their Career Discovery Day held on May 5, 1999. Exhibitors were needed from the manufacturing industry to present vocational career options to the students. Staats attended the Open House conducted by MWD and the Communities of Hemet and San Jacinto on May 8 and 9 at the Eastside Reservoir. Literature concerning Southwest Riverside County was distributed at the Open House. Banner American Products, Inc. of Temecula was a recipient of a Exporter of the Year award given by the IEIBA and presented at the Sixth Annual World Trade Conference & Expo 99 held on May 13, 1999 at Ontario Convention Center. Staats attended the event and distributed literature on Southwest Riverside County. Staats attended the Connect Links meeting held at Temecula City Hall on May 14, 1999 featuring Stellcom, Inc. Staats attended the IEEP quarterly luncheon on May 20, 1999. Deputy Secretary of California Department of Trade and Commerce was the featured speaker at the event. Emphasis on more understanding of the Inland Empire economy was stressed at the meeting. Post Office Box 1388 · Temecula, CA 92593-1388 · Office 909/695-5130 · FAX 909/695-5126 James B. O'Grady June 14, 1999 Page Two Staats continues to attend the Southwest Area Transportation Funding District Meetings held at Supervisor Bob Buster's office. The meetings are centered on the regional transportation issues and are held in collaboration with WRCOG to propose a funding mechanism and approach to provide the necessary improvements to relieve congestion and improve mobility upon the Southwest sub-regional transportation network. Business Relations The Business Relations Committee made contact with six companies during the month of April. Staff continues to assist the committee with documentation and preparation of the visit materials and research regarding the companies to be visited. The Southwest Riverside County Workforce Grant Committee met in May to complete development of the final draft of the survey instrument. Test samples will be mailed early in June and the complete mailing is anticipated to be out to the employers by the second week in June. Meetings will be set in June or early July to begin work on the Resource Guide. The committee is still on track to complete the survey project by no later than September 1999. Monthly updates will continue to be provided. Administration/Organization Staats visited the One-Stop Career Center in Palm Springs at the request of the Board of Directors. A report was given at the Board Meeting held on May 26, 1999. The Board of Directors voted not to become a tenant in the facility due to cost of the tenancy. Steve Harding made a presentation to the Board of Directors on May 26, 1999 of the General Analysis and Implementation Plan. The Board postponed voting until all Board members had a chance to review the material. A special meeting of the Board will be called in June to vote on the program. This concludes the written summary of activity for the month of May. Please call if there are questions concerning this report. Very tr ~ .... udi Staats ~~utive Director APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council rl'J~Nilliam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22,1999 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of May, 1999. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report May 1999 Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: June 22, 1999 WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. 1-151Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: This phase of the Rancho California Road loop ramp project improvement is now complete. The landscape maintenance period has begun and the contractor is correcting punch list items. On April 2, 1999, the City submitted plans and specifications for additional ramp improvements to Caltrans for review. The additional work proposed is as follows: Widen both the southbound and northbound on-ramps to two lanes, widen the north side of Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to the northbound on-ramp to provide an additional lane and optional weslbound right turn lane, and modify the existing median island just east of Front Street to extend the existing left-turn pocket. The City will be going out to public bid for this new work. 2. Margarita Community Park Phase I: The park dedication was April 22. The project improvements included restrooms, parking areas, picnic areas, play equipment, tennis courts, a roller hockey rink, hallfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open turf areas as well as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its ultimate width. The project is complete and is currently in a 90-day landscape maintenance period. 3. Old Town Streetscape Project The street improvements have been completed. A punch list and other detail items are now being worked on by various contractors. 4. 1-15/Winchester Southbound Off-ramp Widening: The contractor has completed the second phase of paving on the southbound exit ramp consisting of widening the southbound off-ramp to provide an additional left turn lane. A final walk through will be conducted by the end of June. The City is currenfiy designing an auxiliary exit lane for the southbound 1-15 Freeway off- ramp north of the Santa Gertrudis Creek. This will allow for significantly more vehicle storage off of the freeway. This design has been submitted to Caltrans for approval. 5. Temecula Duck Pond Park: The park improvements are substantially complete with only the punch list items remaining. It is anticipated that the 90-day maintenance period will begin in the middie of June, and therefore project completion will occur in the middle of September. Park improvements include a gazebo/bandstand, picnic facilities, a restroom, walkways, parking lot, security lighting, and landscaping and irrigation improvements. The street improvements consist of the widening of Ynez Road to full width, between Rancho California Road and Tierra Vista Road. Those improvements include new sidewalks; additional turn lanes, traffic signal modifications at Ynez Road and Rancho California Road, a new traffic signal at Ynez Road and Tierra Vista Road, and pavement restriping to improve traffic circulation. moactrpt/cip/99/may 6. Margarita Road Sidewalk (Rancho Vista to Pauba Road): Construction of the curb, gutter and sidewalk are complete and a few items remain to be completed on the landscape portion of the work. Paving operations on Margarita Road are also now complete. The improvements include the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The sidewalk will improve access to the Rancho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, additive alternate improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent hallfields along with an expanded parking area. Completion is scheduled for September 1999. 7. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening: The contractor has installed the concrete curbs along Winchester Road and Ynez Road and is placing base in the proposed roadway. Paving of Winchester Road and Ynez Road is schedule for the 4m week in June. The electrical sub-contractor is modifying signals and installing new signals at night. The landscaping work for this project has begun. Construction is scheduled to be completed in August 1999. 8. Overland Drive Street Improvements & Margarita Road Street Widening: The contractor is constructing Phase II of the box culvert at Overland Drive and is grading the Long Canyon Creek channel, and detention hasin. The electrical sub-contractor is continuing to place sweet light and waffle signal underground. Complete box culvert grading is occurring on the eastside of Margarita Road for the new sweet section. Construction is scheduled to be completed in August 1999. 9. Winchester Road Median Islands and Enterprise Circle Traffic Signal: The project included the installation of a median island, landscaping and irrigation along Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to 900 feet west. The new median island at Jefferson Avenue will be constructed to provide for a longer left turn pocket for northbound Waffle. Construction is now substantially complete and is in the 90-day maintenance period. 10. 1-15/Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement: Construction of the bridge supports (columns & abutments) are essentially complete, the weste~y abutment should be completed in early June. Erection of temporary falsework is underway and should be complete by mid June. The 1't of 3 stages of Jefferson Avenue modifications continued with the completion of the sewer line & storm drain improvements. Estimated bridge opening is late October 1999. 2 moaettpt/eip/99/may 11. Pala Road Bridge: The bridge improvements continued with the completion of both bridge abutments. The pier wall will be completed the first week of June. Construction of the grouted rock slope protection (Rip-Rap) has begun and will continue through June. Materials for the underground utility improvements have been delivered and construction of the waterlines will begin mid June. Construction began March 1, 1999 with an estimated completion date for Stage I of the project of December 1999. 12. Tennis Court Lighting at Temecula Valley High School A pre-construction meeting was held on April 29 and the contractor will start work after high school graduation, which will be on Monday, June 28. This project will install tennis court lighting along with landscaping, irrigation, fencing, striping, and minor concrete work at Temecula Valley High School. Construction will begin on June 29 1999, with an estimated completion date of August 1999. 13. Rotary Park A pre-construction meeting was held on June 10, 1999. This project will install a picnic shade structure, picnic tables, fencing, concrete and drainage structures. Construction is anticipated to begin in July and be completed by the end of August. OUT TO BID: 1. Traffic Signals on Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road and at Pauba Road Design is complete, and authorization to advertise for public bids was granted by City Council on May 11,1999. Bids were opened June i0, 1999. 2. Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail Undercrossing This project will construct a bike trail in the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek under Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) bridge. The design has been completed and City Council has authorized the Public Works Department to advertise for public bids as of March 2, 1999. Bids will be opened July 1, 1999. WORK IN DESIGN: 1. Pavement Management System: Staff received final plans from the consultant. Staff will add the design to pave Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to Diaz Road to the project plans and specifications. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Rancho California Road and on Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to Diaz Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire length Jefferson Avenue. Construction is anticipated to begin in July 1999 with an estimated completion date of September 1999. 3 moactrpt/cip/99/may 3. Pujol Street Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter: The survey is complete and City staff is currently designing the project. The design is 90% complete. 4. Street Name Sign Replacement - Phase I Design plans and specifications for this project are complete. The bid opening for this project is June 17th. This project will replace existing street name signs in the Santiago Estates area with new plastic molded signs. 5. 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road The City Council approved the Consultant's design contract at the February 9 meeting. Phase I will add one (1) southbound lane on the 1-15 Freeway and widen the northbound on-ramp to two lanes. Phase H will widen the bridge over the Santa Gertrudis Creek at the southbound off-ramp. On May 11, 1999, City Council authorized staff to solicit bids once Caltrans approves the plans and specifications. 6. 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Rancho California Road The City Council approved the Consultant's contract at the February 9 meeting. This project will add one (1) southbound lane on the 1-15 Freeway, widen both on-ramps to two lanes, widen the north side of Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to the north bound ramp, lengthen the west bound left turn pocket at Front Street. On May 11, 1999, City Council authorized staff to solicit bids once Caltrans approves the plans and specifications. 7. Butter~dd Stage Park Improvements This project is currently being designed and is approximately 90% complete. This project will construct a basketball court near the existing parking lot. 8. Old Town Southside Parking Lots The project is currently being designed in-house. This project comists of two (2) proposed parking lots. One will be located on the west side of Front Street just north of Second Street, and the other lot is located on the south side of Fourth Street west of Front Street. 9. First Street Bridge Final construction drawings are complete; construction advertisement is scheduled for May 1999. 10. Citywide Bike Path Construction The design of this project is complete. This project will stripe bike lanes along Jefferson Avenue from Raneho California Road to Sanborn Avenue, Ynez Road from Tower Plaza North to Overland Drive, and Rancho California from Margarita Road to Riesling Court. 4 moactrptlcip/991may LU _1 o r~ W "," o i.- ~ n, > UUUU TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent June 3, 1999 Monthly Activity Report - May, 1999 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of May, 1999: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 53 B. Total signs installed 21 C. Total signs repaired 5 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 7 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons 7,487 70 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 2 VI. VII. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 27 New and repainted legends B. 44,510 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 44,800 18 5,448 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to ~17 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 48 service order requests for the month of Aoril, 1999. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 92 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of May, 1999 was $132,096.77 compared to $35,943.00 for the month of April, 1999. Account No. 5402 ~ 127,161.77 Account No. 5401 $ 4,935.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ -0- cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (CIP/Traffic) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar - Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) '.-0 I",- O0 0 C~ C~ I--. 0 ¢X) 'c- O o. ,_ o. 0 O 0 ~11 O0 0 O0 0 ~ ¢~ 1",,,,,,,¢'0¢"')0 C~. ¢',1 ',¢' It) 0~. 0 O ('~le'l(',,ll",-O N¢"')¢~0 '~' o o a ILl m STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of May, 1999 DATE ACCOUNT CONTRACT0m =. Date: 05/06/99 STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE : 'SACKETT (j0NSTRUeji~i0N :COMPANY ENTERPRISE CIRCLE AT RIDER WAY DESCRIPTION TOTAL OF WORK COST SIZE REMOVE AND REPLACE 29' CROSS GUTTER AND 23.5' OF CURB AND GUTTER # 5402 Date: 05/13/99 # 5402 VIA LOBO CHANNEL TOTAL COST $4,999.00 REPAIRS TO FENCE AND GATES AROUND CHANNEL Date: 05/20/99 # 5402 3RD STREET CUL-DE-SAC TOTAL COST $2,374.00 ENCLOSE V-DITCH WITH FENCE AND GATE CONTRACTOR: Date: 05/28/99 'RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT CITYWIDE - VARIOUS LOCATIONS TOTAL COST $3,828.00 LOT AND R.O.W. WEED SPRAYING AND MECHANICAL WEED ABATEMENT # 5402 CONTRLa, CTOR: Date: 05/28/99 # 5402 .M!KE SULLIVAN SA.N B! AST!N ; i:: RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD MARGARITA ROAD TOTAL COST $4,475.00 REMOVAL OF OLD STRIPING DUE TO "QUICK FIX" CHANGES TOTAL COST $4,900.00 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of May, 1999 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK COST SIZE CONTRACTOR: Date: 05/13/99 · . BECKER ENGINEERING· VIA LOBO CHANNEL # 5401 REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS FROM DRAINAGE CHANNEL Date: 05/20/99 # 5402 OLD TOWN TOTAL COST $4,935.00 SIDEWALK REPAIRS AND CONSTRUCT UNDERSIDEWALK DRAIN Date: 05/25/99 # 5402 28645 FRONT STREET TOTAL COST $4,995.00 POUR AND FINISH NEW SIDEWALK CONTRACTOR: Date: 05/04/00 # 5402 PACIFIC STRIPING CITYWIDE RESTRIPING PROGRAM TOTAL COST $1,900.00 RESTRIPED 1,080,231 L.F. OF VARIOUS CITY STRIPING TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL COST $99,690.77 COST ACCOUNT #5401 COST ACCOUNT #5402 COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 4,935.00 $127,161.77 -0- RECEWED 05/03/99 05/03/99 05/03/99 05/03/99 05/03/99 05/03/99 05/06/99 05/07/99 05/07/99 05/11/99 05/11/99 05/12/99 05/13/99 05/13/99 05/14/989 05/14/99 05/14/99 05/17/99 05/17/99 05/17/99 05/17/99 05/18/99 05/18/99 05/18/99 05/19/99 05/20/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF MAY, 1999 43315 ELINDA ROAD 30909 CORTE ARROYO VISTA 39661 KNOLL RIDGE 42236 SARAH WAY 42181 ROANOAKE 40010 HOLDEN CIRCLE 42811 NORTH STAR COURT 3~695 PASEO GOLETA 45126 AVENIDA DE LA REINA 39250 DEPUTY ROAD 30318 VIA BRISA 27735 YNEZ ROAD RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ 30617 CALLE PICA CALLE 27715 JEFFERSON 30660 LAS SOMBRA COURT 31695 PASEO GOLETA CALLE ANZA 31705 PASEO GOLETA 31763 CORTE POLLENSA 43451 CALLE MORITA 31111 CALLE ARAGON WINCHESTER ROAD AT NICHOLAS SANTIAGO AT FRONT STREET WINCHESTER ROAD AT MARGARITA ROAD RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT CALLE TAJO ·:; : REQijESTi '~ . :" :D~,TE; WORK : : ::. ': :;COMPLETED· TREE TRIMMING 05/03/99 STUMP REMOVAL 05/03/99 PAGER IN CATCH BASIN 05/03/99 REPAINTING OF LEGENDS 05/03/99 MANHOLE REPAIRS 05/03/99 TREE TRIMMING 05/03/99 ROOT PRUNING 05/06/99 STUMP GRINDING 05/07/99 ROOT PRUNING 05/07/99 PO THOLES 05/11/99 TREE SPRAYING 05/11/99 SIGN PICK-UP 05/12/99 POTHOLES 05/13/99 POTHOLES 05/13/99 A.C. REPAIR 05/14/99 POTHOLES 05/14/99 "THANK YOU" 05/14/99 DEBRIS REMOVAL 05/17/99 ROOT PRUNING 05/17/99 DEBRIS REMOVAL 05/17/99 STORM DRAIN CLEANING 05/17/99 TREE SPRAYING 05/18//99 GRAFFITI 05/18/99 DEBRIS REMOVAL 05/18/99 POTHOLE 05/19/99 SIGN REPAIR 05/20/99 \\TEMEC_FS201XDATAXDEPTSXPWXMAINTAINXWKCMPLTDXSORSX99XMAY-99-DOCMAY.99 DATE RECEIVED 05/21/99 05/21/99 05/24/99 05/24/99 05/25/99 05/25/99 05/25/99 05/25/99 05/27/99 05/27/99 05/28/99 'LOCATION 41880 VARDON DRIVE 30300 CHURCHItILL DRIVE 31397 CORTE TUNAS MARGARITA AT SOLANA 29762 CALLE PANTANO 31647 PIO PICO 40469 BRIXTON COVE 45833 CLUBHOUSE 41657 AVENIDA DE LA RE1NA 33317 VIA CHAPPARO 39130 RISING HILL DRIVE . REQUEST · i'.. . TREE REPLACEMENT POTHOLE A.C. CONCERN GRAFFITI LOOSE MANHOLE COVERS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT. SLURRY SEAL REQUESTS SIDEWALK REPAIR STUMP REMOVAL BROKEN GLASS TREE REMOVAL : DATE WORK · COMPLETED 05/21/99 05/21/99 05/24/99 05/24/99 05/25/99 05/25/99 05/25/99 05/25/99 05/27/99 05/27/99 05/28/99 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 37 R:t, MAINTAINXWKCMPLTD\~R~9~{AY.99.DOCMAY,99 ~DATE 05~04/99 05/04/99 05/05/99 05/05/99 05/10/99 05/13/99 05/13/99 05/13/99 05/14/99 05/18/99 05/19/99 05/20/99 05/24/99 05/25/99 05/26/99 05/27/99 05/28/99 05/28/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF MAY, 1999 · · ~LOCATION · · · · MARGARITA AT HWY 79(S) HWY 79 NORTH AT RUSTIC GLEN FELIX VALDEZ AT 67a STREET YNEZ AT FOOD 4 LESS VIA EDUARDO AT PARSIPPANY RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT BUSINESS PARK DRIVE RANCHO VISTA AT SPORTS PARK AOENA AT SOUTHERN CROSS SWEET SHADE LANE RANCHO VISTA 200' EAST OF SANTA SUZANNE PLACE HWY 79 NORTH AT SANTA GERTRUDIS WINCHESTER AT NICHOLAS SOLANA @ STONE RIDGE APARTMENTS (4 LOCATIONS) VIA CORDOBA AT CAMINO VESTE MARGARITA PARK CALLE CATHERINE AT WINDSOR WINCHESTER AT RALPH' S MARKET WINCHESTER AT 1-15 OFF-RAMP · .. :..WORK CO!~P!IITED' .. REMOVED 4 REM O VED 3 REMOVED 107 REM O VED 9 REMOVED 3 REMOVED 2 REMOVED 2 REMOVED 30 REMOVED 20 REMOVED 3,820 REMOVED 350 REMOVED 10 REMOVED 211 REMOVED 20 REMOVED 125 REMOVED 450 REMOVED 36 REMOVED 246 S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED TOTAL LOCATIONS 5,448 18 R:XMAINTAIN~WKCMPLTD~GKAFFITILqgMMAY.99.DOC II III !1 :::} DATE 05/04/99 05/04/99 05/10/99 05/10/99 05/11/99 05/11/99 05/1199 05/12/99 05/12/99 05/14/99 05/14/99 05/20/99 05/25/99 05/26/99 05/27/99 05/28/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF MAY, 1999 LOCATION YNEZ SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA AREA g2 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE EAST AT WINCHESTER MARGARITA BETWEEN SANTIAGO & DE PORTOLA JEFFERSON AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD MAIN AT FRONT STREET CITY LIMIT SIGNS CITY LIMIT SIGNS MARGARITA AT PIO PICO NORTH WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON WINCHESTER AT NICHOLAS 2Nn STREET AT END 6TM STREET AT PUJOL AVENIDA DE LA REINA AT RANCHO VISTA RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT FRONT WINCHESTER EAST OF DIAZ REPLACED REPLACED INSTALLED REPLACED 'WORK:.COMPI~ETEDii R26D & R-81 COMBO 11 R26D & R-81 COMBO G 77 10 P,26D & R-81 COMBOS REPLACED SPECIALTY SIGN INSTALLED R-260 INSTALLED 8 POPULATION SIGNS INSTALLED 3 POPULATION SIGNS REPLACED 23 R26D & R-81 COMBOS REPLACED G-77 REPLACED 2 R-7 REPLACED TYPE "N, REPLACED R- 1 INSTALLED 8 R-S0 REPLACED TYPE "P" MARKER REPLACED W-17 "T. C." "FADED" "T.C." "FADED ' ,,T.C.- T.C. "MISSING" TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 53 21 5 R:~J~IAINTAIN~WKCM PLTDL09~SIGNS\XMAY. 99 DAT.E 05/03/99 05/04/99 05/05/99 05/06/99 05/10/99 05/11/99 05/12/99 05/17/99 05/18/99 05/19/99 05/20/99 05/24/99 05/26/99 05/27/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS LOCATION BUTTERFIELD STAGE AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. DIAZ ROAD DIAZ ROAD CALLE RESACA / 2ND STREET ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH DIAZ ROAD CRC / 2ND STREET CRC / RIDER WAY DIAZ ROAD (VARIOUS LOCATIONS) DIAZ ROAD (VARIOUS LOCATIONS) D]AZ ROAD (VARIOUS LOCATIONS) OLD TOWN OLD TOWN YNEZ AT 1-15 / OLD TOWN MONTH OF MAY, 1999 SCOPE OF WORK REPAIR EDGE OF PAVEMENT R&R A.C. R&R A.C. A.C. OVERLAYS A.C. OVERLAYS R&R A.C. A.C. OVERLAYS A.C. OVERLAYS R&R A.C. R&R A.C. R&R A.C. A.C. OVERLAYS A.C. OVERLAYS A.C. OVERLAYS · S.F. ·. TOTAL' i TONS · 75 1.5 145 5.5 210 7.5 596 3.5 281 3.5 545 4.5 798 4.5 341 3.5 210 7.5 171 5.5 185 6.5 570 3.5 1,545 6.5 1,815 6.5 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS TOTAL TONS 7.487 70 R,:~vIAINTAINI'WKCMPLTIX~SPRALT. RPR~08qVIAY.~J D,~TE 05/03/99 05/04/99 05/05/99 05/06/99 05/10/99 05/12/99 05/13/99 05/19/99 05/19/99 05/24/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF MAY, 1999 LOCATION AREA #1 AREA #1 AREAS 1 & 2 AREAS 1 & 2 AREAS 1, 2 & 3 CITYWIDE RESTRIPING PROJECTS AREA #3 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON MARGARITA ROAD AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD RANCHO VISTA :: 'WORK COMPLETED REPAINTED 9,393 L.F. OF RED CURB REPAINTED 6,352 L.F. OF RED CURB REPAINTED 9,021 L.F. OF RED CURB REPAINTED 6,752 L.F. OF RED CURB REPAINTED 1,866 L.F. OF RED CURB INSTALLED 12 NEW LEGENDS REPAINTED 2,738 L.F. OF RED CURB INSTALLED 7 NEW LEGENDS REPAINTED 8 NEW LEGENDS REPAINTED 8,388 L.F. OF RED CURB TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 27 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 44,510 R:'~4AINTAINXWKCMPLTD\STRIPINC~gXMAY.99.DOCMAY.99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF MAY, 1999 DATE 05/05/99 05/12/99 05/13/99 05/17/99 05/17/99 05/20/99 05/21/99 05/24/99 05/25/99 05/27/99 LOCATION NICHOLAS ROAD AT VIA LOBO AGENA AT SOUTHERN CROSS FRONT AT SANTIAGO YNEZ NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD YNEZ AT SOLANA OLD TOWN 6TH STREET AT MERCEDES OLD TOWN OLD TOWN OLD TOWN WORK COM Pt, ETE D ABATED ABATE/) ABATED ABATED ABATED ABATED ABATED ABATED ABATED ABATED 3,500 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 1,600 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 1,050 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 7,500 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 9,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 7,200 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 1,400 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 5,450 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 4,100 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 4,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 44.800 \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTSXPWMVIAINTA1NXWKCMPLTD\WEEDS~99XMAY-99.DOC D~TE. 05105199 05/13/99 05/24/99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF MAY, 1999 LOCA'FION'i' NICHOLAS ROAD AT VIA LOBO VALLEJO CHANNEL 6TH STREET AT STATION WORK COMPLETED ": TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R:~MAINTAINXWKCMPLTD\TREES~)~MAY.99.DOCMAY.99 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF MAY, 1999 DAT.E 05/18/99 LOCATION 31705 PASEO GOLETA · wonK COMn~tTED ..: CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 2 R:~,[AINTAIN~WKCMPLETD~99~,TCHBAS\~VIAY.99 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD T-f, 0 Ply► . I4-em Nv, Temecula, CA 92591 June 20, 1999 Board of Directors/City Council Temecula Community Services District c/o District Secretary City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA Re: TCSD Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 We are in receipt of your notification of the proposed charges by service level for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as they affect Parcel Number 953-322-003. Our concerns are in regard to Service Level D refuse collection(specifically recycled material) and street maintenance(specifically sweeping). As regards refuse collection, has there been a recent study(or any study) to determine the necessity of collecting recycled material on an every week basis? If containers were rinsed out and cans flattened—which is standard operating procedure in many parts of the country—we believe that very few families in Temecula would fill the blue recycle bins each week. Since the containers and cans would be clean refuse, retaining them for pickup twice a month should not pose a health problem. Neither should collecting recycled material twice a month rather than once a week meet with much homeowner resistance if"property owners in the City of Temecula only pay for the services that they actually receive". Logically there should be some reduction in tax if there is a reduction in service. As regards street maintenance, is there an effort to coordinate sweeping and refuse collection? It would seem to make sense to sweep on the day after trash pickup,but on Britton Circle the street is swept on Monday and the refuse is collected on Thursday. In addition, most homeowners in this area straighten up their yards on weekends—so, if there was any trash lying in the street, the least likely day for it to be there is on Monday. We were unable to attend the Public Workshop on June 10,but we hope that the concerns raised in this letter can be addressed by the Board of Directors/City Council at the Public Hearing on June 22. Sincerely, Barbara L. Johnston Dana A. Ginn (