The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About071399 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE July '13, '1999 - 7:00 P.M. in!~he Code Seerio. Street, 93:2'~i~.,53-007), ). of the Trubt, Irwin, ~i~'.' La~tyi;~ an~[']~U~t'~'.'::~li~d~o~tibti6h;~r~!;ffi'~;"pri~ ai~d terms of payment of the ~: reaj ;~rope~ i~/~;~"~' ~R~::d~:~:~'b~'~ireS~ ~he 'Ci~lAgency negotiators are :.~: 2~: Conference w{th'aity,:~o'f~y':and legal cOunSel pursuant to Government Code '~;:.'.., .SeC. ti0n .54956~9(aj'~with. {ediCt to :~o~::ma~ersof exi~ting litigatioa involving the , :; ? ~Ci~'~': andid:~':':' the"' ~~'~ ':':' ~h'e' folibwih:g qseslCl~imS' will be "~ffiscussed: 1 ) ~?~ir~'~one ~ ~i~ 6f Y~'ecu b ~n'd '~)~i~~ ~:~de' City i'l(Biil 6endy). 3~ Conference with~.':~Gi~:..A~orn~y'. and I~al '~ounsel pursuant to GoVernment Code ' Section 54956,9(b).with '~Sp~:Ct to"on.bma~er ofpotential litigation. With respect to each ma~ef~ ~'~e'Ci~:{A~rney. ha~:;determined.:'t~t: a point has been reached : .~where thethe. i~".'a':.~igh~"~a~:~o~ur~ 'to'."iitig~tio~ 'in~ol~ing..the City and/or the ' ' ' ,' ,' , '.':~ . "~L. · '. , '.~'~t" ' ". "':~ . ,... ....·. :. .. . .~ At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 99-18 Resolution: No. 99-63 R:~Agenda\071399 CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Matthew Cappiello Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula Mayor Pro Tem Stone Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Temecula Good Neighbor Award Western Eagle Foundation Proclamation Held HosDitalized Veterans Proclamation Balloon and Wine Festival Presentation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: R:~genda\071399 2 2 4 5 6 7 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1999; 2.2 Approve the minutes of June 10, 1999. Resolution Approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1999. City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity, and yield for City funds. 1998-99 Communitv Service Fundin.a Pro.Gram Special Distribution RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Review and approve the 1998-99 Community Service Funding Program application request from the Education Foundation in the amount of $12,000 to fund the Chaparral High School stadium lighting. Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~genda\071399 3 8 9 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTION OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW, ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS, AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02, and 2002-03 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant funds for Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03. Maintenance Facility Furniture RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve an expenditure to Pacific Business Interiors (PBI) in the amount of $67,433.65 to purchase furniture that will be installed in the Maintenance Facility office additions and modifications. 10 Street Name - Nada Lane 11 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING A PORTION OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY TO THE STREET NAME NADA LANE Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savin.qs Act RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\071399 4 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION 12 13 Tract MaD No. 28850 (located south of Margarita Road between Avenida Sonoma and 160 feet west of Avenida Cima Del Sol) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Tract Map No. 28850 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 12.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 12.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. Authorize Temporary Partial Street Closures for Bike Races on July 25 and July 31, 1999 ('Business Park Drive and Sin.ale Oak Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25, 1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY 31, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS 14 Substitute A.clreements and Securities in Tract No. 24185-2 ('located northwesterly of the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement and Subdivision Monument Agreements, and Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities in Tract No. 24185-2; 14.2 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities on file; 14.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and sureties. R:~Agenda\071399 5 15 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic SiQnal Ec~uipment RECOM M E N DATI ON: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PU RPOS ES, FACILITATI N G IN F RASTRU CTU RE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT 16 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Si.qnal Equipment RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE P U RPOS ES, FACI LITATI N G I N F RAST RU CT U RE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT 17 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Equipment RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT R:~Agenda\071399 6 18 Overland Drive Overcrossin.e Improvements - Proiect No. PW95-11 - Amendment to Cooperative A.~reement No. 8-931 (Resolution No. 96-113) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-93t BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS 19 Pechan.aa Band of Mission Indians Pre-Excavation Aqreement - Pala Road Brid.cle Improvement- Project No. PW97-15 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Approve the agreement with the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Indian Reservation (Pechanga Band) for the cost to monitor grading operations in conjunction with the construction of the Pala Road Bridge - Project No. PW97-15 - and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 20 Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement with Riverside County Transportation Department for Weekend Traffic Control at I-15 and Highwav 79 South RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Approve an amendment to an existing agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County extending California Highway Patrol (CHP) traffic control services for weekend traffic control at I-15 and Highway 79 South in an amount not to exceed $10,500.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment. 21 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Signal and Median Modification at Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive - Project No. PW99-09 RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Approve the Project Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the modification of the traffic signal and median islands at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive - Project No. PW99-09. R:~Agenda\071399 7 22 Award of Construction Contract for the Street Name Si.qn Replacement - Project No. PW98-18 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Award construction contract for the Street Name Sign Replacement - Project No. PW98-18 - J. K. Weigle Engineering Contract in the amount of $40,611.16 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 22.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $4,061.11 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 23 Second Readin.a of Ordinance No. 99-12 RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0160) RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~genda\071399 8 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01 Resolution: No. CSD 99-13 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Completion and Acceptance of the Margarita Community Park - Phase 1 - Project No. PW95-19CSD RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Accept the Margarita Community Park- Phase 1 - Project No. PW95-19CSD; 1.2 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 1.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. R:~Agenda\071399 9 2 3 4 5 Award of Construction Contract for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing - Project No. PW97-25CSD RECOMMENDATION: 3,1 Award a contract for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing - Project No. PW97-25CSD - to Granite Construction Company for $268,268.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract; 3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $26,826.80 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Release of Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for Tract No. 28309 - S. R. Group, LLC (Nicolas Road, east of North General Kearny Road) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to release the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for the construction of perimeter slope and landscaping within Tract No. 28309 - S. R. Group, LLC; 3.2 Direct the City Clerk/District Secretary to notify the developer and surety. Authorization to Bid and Determination of Categorical Exemption for the Installation of Citywide Bike Lane Improvements RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Determine that the installation of the Bike Lane Improvements along Jefferson Avenue, Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Margarita Road are Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; 4.2 Authorize the filing of a Notice of Exemption for EA-058 with the appropriate filing fee for the project with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office; 4.3 Approve the construction documents and authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Citywide Bike Lane Improvements within Jefferson Avenue, Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Margarita Road. Approval of Resolution Establishing FY 2000-01 Rates and Charges for Service Level B {'Residential Street Lights), Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance), Service Level D ('Refuse Collection, Recycling, and Street Sweeping) for Redhawk and Vail Ranch Annexation, Subject to Voter Approval RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\071399 10 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, July 27, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda~071399 11 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01 Resolution: No. RDA 99-11 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberrs, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Revision of the Residential Improvement Program, the First-Time Homebuyer Program, And the Employee Relocation Pro.aram RECOM M E N DATION: 1.1 Approve the revised Program Parameters for the Residential Improvement Program; 1.2 Approve the revised Program Parameters for the First-Time Homebuyer Program; 1.3 Approve the revised Program Parameters for the Employee Relocation Program. 2 Revision of the Facade Improvement Program RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the recommended revisions to the Fa(;ade Improvement Program. R:~Agenda\071399 12 4 Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group for the potential redevelopment of the Poole Property. Grantin.q of an Easement for Southern California Edison RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL SUPPLY AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE MISSION VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, July 27, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda~71399 13 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 24 An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Recommend Approval to the City Council for PA98-0511, a Zoning Amendment to create a Planned Development Overlay, and the Plannin.q Commission's aPProval of PA98-0512, a proposal to develop a 244-unit senior apartment complex with two-and three-storv buildings on an 8.13 acre lot RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Continue to the July 27, 1999, City Council meeting. 25 Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zonin.~ Amendment, Map Change) RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0446; 25.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0446; 25.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP CHANGE) AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LI (1 ACRE TO 2.5 ACRE NET LOT SIZE) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 (1/2 ACRE TO I ACRE NET LOT SIZE), ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO STREET AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011 R:~Agenda\071399 14 26 Planning Application No. PA99-0104 ('Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 263) RECOMMENDATION: 26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) THAT REQUESTS AN INCREASE IN THE HEIGHT OF THE THEATRE MARQUEE FROM 12 FEET TO 26 FEET WITHIN THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 27 Second Readincl of Ordinance No. 99-14 ('Fire Codes) RECOMMENDATION: 27.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME I, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION 28 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-16 ('Uniform Building Codes) RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: R:~,genda~071399 15 ORDINANCE NO. 99-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE COUNCIL BUSINESS 29 Adoption of the FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program RECOMMENDATION: 29.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2000-04 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 1999-00 30 Sta.qgered Work Hours RECOMMENDATION: 30.1 Receive and file. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, July 27, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:V~,genda\071399 16 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-59 ORDERING, CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, July 27, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve. Temecula, California. R:%Agenda~071399 17 SUPPLEMENTAL TO ITEM NO. 6 DATE 6/16/99 6/25/99 7/8/99 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL STADIUM COMMITTEE FUNDRAISING /DONATION ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION CREDITS DEBITS Be~nning Balance $61,676.78 Deposit (Donations) $ 8,570.00 Deposit (Donations) $ 6701.50 Ending Balance $76,948.28 PLEDGES Norm Reeves Expected golf tournament revenues (held 6~28) Matching funds applied for from Guidant And Temple Inland Mortgage VRRA BBQ $5000.00 $4000.00 $1500.00 $ 150.00 TOTAL FUNDS AND PLEDGES $87,598.28 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $4,583,797.77. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13~h day of July, 1999. A'I'rEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Re~oa ] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resdution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14' day of July, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 06/17/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06124199 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/01/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/13/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/13/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/24/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 06/30/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 07113/99 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 210 261 280 300 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 100 GENERAL 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCS D 1 '~"~ TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 1~--'. TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: SHAWN NELSON, ACTING CITY MANAGER $ 631,908.69 325,344.47 912,765.85 401,936.56 2,080,369.41 183,969.15 47,513.64 $ 4,583,797.77 1,1 91,942.20 20,402.73 97,622.85 16,874.96 27,984.06 12,546.41 1,119,371.36 1,723,941.65 453.50 41,040.52 4,795.63 50,448.00 21,114.49 23,776.52 166,465.85 5,572.42 40,587.62 70.61 ~ 76.59 ?.,~11.17 969.56 2,498.06 822.07 6,095.17 1,195.29 4,717.38 $ 4,352,314.98 231,482.79 4,583,797.77 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 06/17/99 10:33 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 11 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/NOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 101,560.73 6,57~.14 34,115.04 16,038.43 25,455.99 2,854.84 413.64 414~108.90 4,671.39 209.18 19,276.41 2w646.64 3,978.36 TOTAL 631,908.69 VOUCHRE2 06/17/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56211 56213 56214 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999997 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 999998 10:33 CHECK DATE 06/11/99 06/16/99 06/16/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06117/99 06117/99 06117/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 0~/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 VENDOR NUMBER 001159 002372 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 0002~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 VENDOR NAME CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE TEMECULA PIZZA COMPANY HARMON, JUDY INSTATAX (EDD) iNSTATAX CEDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EOD) [NSTATAX (EOD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EOD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDO) [NSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDO) INSTATAX (EDD) iNSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (]RS) INSTATAX (IRS) iNSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) ]NSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (iRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (ZRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (ZRS) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS REFRESHMENTS:CIP t40RKSHOP:6/16 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SD1 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MED1CARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDiCARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MED1CARE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5250 001-140-999-5260 190-183-999-5330 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 280-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 ITEM AMOUNT ~.00 65.08 390.40 72.41 2.31 60.11 .51 1.91 3.20 2.77 5,827.25 126.50 698.63 1.47 3.54 58.30 21.69 49.97 12.08 146.70 24.38 137.15 21,333.41 416.18 3,607.81 8.70 22.03 304.44 126.61 159.14 41.94 642.17 119.63 587.48 5,295.11 137.99 1,112.36 2.44 6.18 77.60 34.39 61.57 24.18 139.19 46.88 130.99 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT ~.00 65.08 390.40 7,250.88 34,438.42 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 06/17199 10:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56217 06/17/99 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV FLOOR MATS/TO~/EL SVCS: CRC 190-182-999-5250 79.35 56217 06/17/99 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS FOR PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5243 65.16 56217 06/17/99 005285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.a SR.CTR. 190-181-999-5250 56.96 56217 06/17/99 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.a TCC 190-184-999-5250 51.46 56217 06/17/99 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.~ CTY.HALL 340-199-701-5250 83.40 56217 06/17/99 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.~HTNC.FAC. 540-199-702-5250 35.00 56217 06/17/99 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS FOR TCSD MA]NT CREW 190-180-999-5243 28.00 379.33 56218 56218 06/17/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 4/24 WILLIAMS 280-199-999-5118 105.39 06/17/9<) 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 4/24 WILLIAMS 280-199-999-5118 275.16 56219 06/17/99 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY DATA STORAGE CART CTR T20 ARCH 001-120-999-5277 510.30 56219 06/17/99 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY DATA STORAGE MICROBOX ARCHIVAL 001-120-9<)9-5277 16.24 56219 06/17/99 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY APERTURE CARD BOX ARCHIVE 001-120-999-5277 40.60 56219 06/17/99 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY LEASED CTR CONTAINER T20 001-120-999-5277 56.00 56219 06/17/99 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY LEASED CTR MICROBOX #648 001-120-999-5277 8.00 56219 06/17/99 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY LEASED CTR APER.CARD BOX #686 001-120-999-5277 20.00 380.55 651.14 56220 56220 56221 06/17/99 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5301 135.55 06/17/99 -000122 B S N SPORTS TEEN/GAME AREA EQUIP: CRC 190-182-999-5301 112.93 06/17/99 003126 BOOHGAARDEN,'DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 254.40 56222 06/17/99 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS MINOLTA TONER 330-199-999-5220 270.00 56222 06/17/99 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 11" PAPER ROLL FOR TONER 330-199-999-5220 178.50 56222 06/17/99 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 18" PAPER ROLL FOR TONER 330-199-999-5220 376.00 56222 06/17/99 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220 41.39 56222 06/17/99 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS SALES TAX 330-199-999-5220 63.90 248.48 254.40 929.79 56223 0S/17/99 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES MONTHLY RESTROOM/FACILITY RENT 280-199-999-5234 2,478,00 56223 06/17/99 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES MONTHLY RESTROOM/FACILITY RENT 280-199-999-5234 1,652.00- 826.00 56224 06/17/99 003724 C A P P 0 INC PURCHASING COURSE: M.VOLLMUTH 001-140-999-5261 25.00 25.OO 56225 06/17/99 003214 CAL MAT PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 001-164-601-5218 2,103.00 2,103.00 56226 06/17/99 001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY WELDING SERVS & SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5301 5.00 56227 06/17/99 003528 CANTU, MAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 240.00 56228 06/17/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRESHMENTS: STAFF MTG 001-161-999-5260 11.20 5.00 240.00 11.20 56229 06/17/99 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 592.95 56229 06/17/99 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 1.096.36 56229 06/17/99 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 472.16 56229 06/17/99 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 109.91 2,271.38 56230 06/17/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263 25.61 56230 06/17/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-99<)-5263 21.85 56230 06/17/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-120-999-5262 20.02 67.48 VOUCHREZ 06/17/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56231 56232 56232 56233 56234 56234 56234 56234 56234 56235 56235 56236 56237 56238 56239 56240 56241 56241 56242 56243 56244 56244 56245 56245 56246 56246 56246 56246 56246 56247 56248 56248 56248 10:33 CHECK DATE 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 0~/17/99 0(~/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 VENDOR NUMBER 001275 000442 000442 002405 000447 000447 000447 000447 000447 001393 001393 003681 002954 001673 001669 001669 001380 000523 002390 002390 001056 001056 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 001135 000184 000184 000184 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION COI4PUSERVE INC SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS (20) UPS REPLACEMENT BATTERIES COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS SALES TAX COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC YRLY PREVENTATIVE MAINT AGRMNT COMTRONIX OF HEMET COMTRONIX OF.HEMET COl4TRONIX OF HEMET COMTRONIX OF HEMET COMTRONIX OF HEMET CITY HALL - KENWOOD PORTABLE KENWOOD 1500 NAH NICAD BATTERY KENWOOD KSC-20 BATTERY CHARGER UNIDEN APX 1100 NICAD BATTERY SALES TAX DATA TICKET INC DATA TICKET INC MAR-APR PARKING CIT.PROCESSING MAR-APR PARKING CIT.PROCESSING DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI MAINT, FAC. PHASE 111 HODS. DIAMOND GARAGE DOOR [NC RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM: C. LOPEZ DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 6/6 WIGHTMAN DOWNTOWN IDEA EXCHANGE ANNUL SUB:D.T.IDEA EXCHANGE:JM DOWNTOWN PROMOTION REPO ANN'L SUB:D.T.PROMO REPORT:JM DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFIT] REMOVAL DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFIT[ REMOVAL E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 3/26 HILLBERG EASTERN MUNXCIPAL WATER 95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSCP EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER STREET MAINTENANCE:FRONT ST. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER MARGARITA & PAUBA DRAWINGS EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE FLOWERS FOR OLD TWN BARRELS MAY LDSCP REPAIRS:OLD TWN FEDERAL EXPRESS INC FEDERAL EXPRESS INC FEDERAL EXPRESS INC FEDERAL EXPRESS INC FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 197-5072 GENERAL USAGE 909 506-1941PTA CD TTACSD 909 699-1370 SVC FOR COP ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5215 320-199"999-5Z15 3ZO-199-999-SZ15 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 Z10-190-158-5802 165-199-813-5804 001-111-999-5118 280-199-999-5228 280-199-999-5228 001-16~-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 165-199-999'5118 193-180-999-5240 280-199-824-5804 001-163-999-5250 001-164-603-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-165-999-5230 001-150-999-5250 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 ITEM AMOUNT 9.95 1,100.00 85.25 2,300.00 1,210.00 160,00 154.00 340.00 144.46 135.25 135.25 14,325.00 760.00 260.00 167.00 129.00 89.69 89.35 1,401.75 350.96 1,059.09 14.16 528.00 246.80 46.95 52.75 12.75 17.75 15.00 265.00 4,945,67 56.85 123.45 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 9.95 1,185.25 2,300.00 2,008.46 270.50 14,325.00 760.00 260.00 167.00 lZ9.00 179.04 1,401.75 350.96 1,073.25 774.80 145.20 265.00 5,125.97 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA 06/17/99 10:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56249 06/17/99 001155 G T E CALIFORNIA INC JUN ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE ]20-199-999-5208 ]20.00 56249 06/17/99 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA INC JUN ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE ]20-199-999-5208 320.00 640. O0 56250 06/17/99 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES REPAIR WINDOW SHADE @ CRC 190-182-999-5212 28.55 56250 06/17/99 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES LABOR ] HOURS @S45.00 190-182-999-5212 115.00 56250 06/17/99 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES TRAVEL 3 HOURS $45.00 190-182-999-5212 135.00 56250 06/17/99 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES BROKEN APPT SERVICE CHARGE 190-182-999-5212 25.00 56250 06/17/99 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 25.08 56250 06/17/99 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 25.08- 323.55 56251 06/17/99 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEN POLICE 001-170-999-5214 56252 06/17/99 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA BINDING & LAMINATION SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 140.00 547.35 140.00 547.35 56253 06/17/99 002528 GLASS BLASTERS CiTY SEAL MUGS FOR NEW HIRES 001-150-999-5265 64.65 64.65 56254 06/17/99 00017'/GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY MGR 001-110-999-5220 240.82 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:COPY CNTR 330-199-999-5220 143.19 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLRK 001-120-999-5220 800.00 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLRK 001-120-999-5220 325.10 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PLANNING 001-161-999-5220 1,000.00 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PLANNING 001-161-999-5220 362.60 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5220 191.42 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5220 87.88 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 249.94 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT DRUM FOR FAX MACHINE 001-170-999-5229 161.13 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SALES TAX 001-170-999-5229 12.49 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DPT 001-171-999-5220 101.33 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: INF SYS 320-199-999-5221 107.77 56254 0~/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:RECORDS M 001-120-999-5277 147.72 56254 06/17/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: ECON DEV 001-111-999-5220 206.28 4,137.67 56255 06/17/99 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 410.06 410.06 56256 06/17/99 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH POSTERS:4TH OF JULY CONCERT 190-183-999-5370 1,041.00 56256 06/17/99 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370 80.68 56256 06/17/99 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH POSITIVE FILM:JULY 4TH CONCERT 190-180-999-5254 191.00 56256 06/17/99 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH SALES TAX 190-180-999-5254 14.80 1,327.48 56257 06/17/99 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING 3/1-5/31/99 001-170-999-5229 55.50 55.50 56258 06/17/99 003690 GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS 4-COLOR AD INSERT FOR TEMECULA 001-111-999-5270 4,553.45 4,553.45 56259 06/17/99 GUERRIERO, RON REIMB: APA NAT'L CF:4/24-28 001-161-999-5272 155.16 155.16 56260 06/17/99 000190 HOME BASE RESID IMPRV PRGM: CESAR LOPEZ 165-199-813-5804 262.90 262.90 56261 06/17/99 INLAND AREA PERSONNEL M IAPMA MEMBERSHIP:YATES:FY99-O0 001-150-999-5226 25.00 25.00 56262 06/17/99 001377 INLAND EMPIRE MANAGERS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: CITY MANGER 001-110-999-5226 20.00 20.00 VOUCHRE2 06/17/99 10:33 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 56263 06/17/99 003319 56264 06/17/99 001407 56264 06/17/99 001407 56265 06/17/99 001186 56266 06/17/99 003695 56266 06/17/99 003695 56267 06/17/99 56268 06/17/99 000203 56269 06/17/99 003711 56270 06/17/99 000206 56271 06/17/99 003469 56272 06/17/99 002187 56273 06/17/99 002700 56273 06/17/99 002700 56273 06/17/99 002700 56274 06/17/99 56274 06/17/99 56275 06/17/99 000653 56276 06/17/99 001967 56276 06/17/99 001967 56276 06/17/99 001967 56276 06/17/99 001967 56276 06/17/99 001967 56277 06/17/99 002664 56277 06/17/99 002664 56277 06/17/99 002664 56278 0~/17/99 000217 56279 06/17/99 002011 56280 06/17/99 000944 56280 06/17/99 000944 56280 06/17/99 000944 56281 06/17/99 003241 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION INLAND ENTERTAINMENT RO AD:SUMMER CONCERT SERIES 1999 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL IRWIN, JOHN J WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE J WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE JOAN F. SPARKMAN ELEM. JOBS AVAILABLE INC KHALSA, ATNA KINKOS INC LABAHN, PETER A. LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR LIBERTY PAINT & BODY LIBERTY PAINT & BODY LIBERTY PAINT & BODY LOPEZ, ROSA LOPEZ, ROSA LUCKY GROCERY STORE INC MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOgER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV NANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MAR CO INDUSTRIES iNC MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS HARTIN, KATHARINA E. MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I MILLAR HEATING & AIR IN CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REMOVE TREES 8 DUCK POND S-8 VILLAGES TREE TRIMMING REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT AD:PARKS & LDSCP DEVEL TECH TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES REIMBURSE:OFFICE SUPPLIES:P.D. MAY 1999 ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS VEHICLE BODY & PAINT REPAIRS LABOR FOR REPAIRS TO VEHICLE SALES TAX REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM RENTAL SR. EXCUR. TCKTS:DEL MAR FAIR TEMP HELP W/E 5/02 BROMMET TEMP HELP W/E 5/02 BROMMET TEMP HELP W/E 5/02 COOK TEMP HELP W/E 5/02 LUQUE TEMP HELP W/E 05/30/99:LUQUE A FACTORY CAT-MAiNTENANCE SERVIC CLAR "21"/MAINTENANCE SERVICE CREDIT:DUPL.PMT:REF. ]NV#14325 MAY SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVCS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES:97-06/08 CITY HALL HVAC REPAIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5254 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-2900 001-150-999-5254 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5222 001-170-999-5220 001-172-999-5255 001-110-999'5214 001-110-999-5214 001-110-999-5214 190-2900 190-183-4990 190-183-999'5350 001-140-999'5118 280-199-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 340-199-701-5118 340-199-701-5118 190-182-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5330 210-165-681'5801 210-165-681-5804 210-165-681-5804 340-199-701-5250 I T EM AMOUNT 100,00 118.53 118.53 452.00 1,490.00 260.00 100.00 182.16 476.00 5.66 280.14 4,895.05 389.76 63. O0 30.21 100.00 223.00 81.00 65.82 92.88 406.35 211.40 211,40 125.00 63, O0 125.00- 3,168.00 1,040.00 41,698.63- 41,698.63 77,620.38 45.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 237.06 452.00 1,750.00 100.00 182.16 476.00 5.66 280.14 4,895.05 482.97 323.00 81.00 987.85 63.00 3,168.00 1,040.00 77,620.38 45.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/17/99 10:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AHOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56282 06/17/99 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM MONTHLY LEASE/TEN CONM REC CEN 190-182-999-5239 162.70 162.70 56283 06/17/99 000437 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES TEMP ACCT ASST/JOHN TSAI 001-140-999-5118 795.00 795.00 56284 06/17/99 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS STENCIL PAINT FOR PW CREW 001-164-601-5218 1,878.64 1,878.64 56285 06/17/99 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI DRINKING FOUNT, SUPPLIES:PARKS 190-180-999-5212 444.00 444.00 56286 06/17/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MA1NT 001-164-601-5214 20.00 56286 06/17/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MA[NT 001-162-999-5214 90.38 56286 06/17/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 40.18 56286 06/17/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 15.95 56286 06/17/99 002105 OLD TO~/N TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAINT:LAND DEV 001-163-999-5214 27.95 56286 06/17/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAINT:CIP DIV 001-165-999-5214 29.19 223.65 56287 06/17/99 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CONPAN SUPPLIES:4TH OF JULY PARADE 190-183-999-5370 77.95 56287 06/17/99 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CONPAN FREIGHT 190-183-999-5370 9.95 87.90 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED PLASTIC WALL BUSINESS CARD 001-163-999-5220 52.50 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED PLASTIC WALL BUSINESS CARD 001-164-604-5220 52.50 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED SALES TAX 001-163-999-5220 4.07 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED SALES TAX 001-164-604-5220 4.07 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED BUS. CARD HOLDER 001-162-999-5220 125.50 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED BROCHURE HOLDER 001-162-999-5220 351.50 56288 06/17/99 002216 P F C UNLIMITED SALES TAX 001-162-999-5220 36.97 627.11 56289 06/17/99 PAUBA VALLEY ELEMENTARY REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130 11.13 56290 0~/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 25,836,25 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 693.64 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130 3.01 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,005.26 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.31 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 33.93 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 407.31 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 196,67 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130 .90 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 301.77 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 130.52 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 690.59 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 142.40 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 511.13 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 100.64 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130 2.81 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130 5.61 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193'2130 39.33 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130 8.44 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 86.59 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 14.81 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/17/99 10:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 56290 06/17/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 .05 .14 1.51 .8~ .92 .46 1.86 .93 2.18 33,246.81 56Z92 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5250 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-182-999-5242 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5230 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-184-999-5301 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 194-180-999-5254 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5220 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5222 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5222 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5301 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 280-199-999-5260 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5220 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-604-5214 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5220 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-171-999-5220 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 320-199-999-5221 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5242 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5242 56292 06/17/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 57.90 37.00 6.00 12.85 4.00 2.65 3.54 25.00 24.89 19.21 6.45 17.43 2.80 30.78 11.98 4.12 39.86 6.00 22.50 8.95 4.57 8.45 46.83 38.29 5.59 2.94 7.18 457.76 56294 06/17/99 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 56294 06/17/99 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-165-999-5250 12.88 70.99 83.87 56295 0c~/17/99 003704 PRESENTATION SYSTEMS REPL LAMP 580 LCD PROJECTOR 320-199-999-5221 56295 06/17/99 003704 PRESENTATION SYSTEMS FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 56295 06/17/99 003704 PRESENTATION SYSTEMS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 395.00 10.00 30.61 435.61 56296 06/17/99 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA PROF. SURVEYING SERVICES 280-199-999-5250 56297 06/17/99 PROMENADE-PCH, LP OVERPAYMENT OF FEES:LD99-O11GR 001-2670 1,300.00 165.00 1,300.00 165.00 56298 06/17/99 003621 Q WEST L C I INTL TELEC MAY: LONG DISTANCE SVC:CTY HL 320-199-999-5208 7.40 7.40 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/17/99 10:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56299 06/17/99 001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC CASE SAFETY 1GRAFFITI REMOVER 001-164-601-5218 56299 06/17/99 001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC CASE SAFETY 2 GRAFFITI REMOVER 001-164-601-5218 56299 06/17/~9 001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 251.40 251.40 38.97 541.77 56300 06/17/99 003308 R D 0 RENTAL COMPANY 56300 06/17/99 003308 R D 0 RENTAL COMPANY RENTAL EQUIPMENT/PUBLIC WORKS 001-164-601-5238 RENTAL EQUIPMENT/PUBLIC WORKS 001-164-601-5238 195.57 65.19 260.76 56301 06/17/99 000981 R H F INC RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT 001-170-999-5215 68.87 68.87 56302 06/17/99 002612 RADIO SHACK INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 56302 06/17/99 002612 RADIO SHACK INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 4.30 258.51 262.81 56303 06/17/99 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB BACKFLOW DEVICE TESTING/REPAIR 193-180-999-5212 50.00 50.00 56304 06/17/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 01-02-98010-O/PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240 56304 06/17/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 56304 06/17/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 56304 06/17/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 213.50 1,912.52 132.88 1,565.39 3,824.29 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-162-999-5214 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-165-999-5214 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE OETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5214 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE OETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5263 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-163-999-5214 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE OETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5263 56305 06/17/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 340-199-701-5214 60.00 24.00 24.00 74.16 43.00 48.00 17.54 12.00 302.70 56306 06/17/99 001628 REBEL RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 53.88 53.88 56307 0~/17/99 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE WEED SPRAYING/WEED ABATEMENT 001-164-601-5402 1,405.00 1,405.00 56308 06/17/99 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET MAY/99: PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5247 78.00 7B.O0 56309 06/17/99 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR 56309 06/17/99 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR APR 99 PARKING CIT. ASSESSMENT 001-2260 2,514.50 APR 99 PARKING CIT. ASSESSMENT 001-2265 165.00 2,679.50 56310 06/17/99 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE RECORDING PAID OFF LOAN FEES 165-199-812-5804 81.00 81.00 56311 06/17/99 002940 RIVERSIDE CO OF (GIS SY GIS CONSULTING SVCS:3RD QTR 001-161-610-5248 709.26 709.26 56312 06/17/99 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM: J. MOWRY 165-199-813-5804 2,695.00 2,695.00 56313 06/17/99 RUIZ, ESTOLIA REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAHP 190-183-4984 320.00 320.00 56314 06/17/99 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC MISC CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 163.16 163.16 56315 06/17/99 001942 S C SIGNS SIGN POSTING SERVICES 001-161-999-5256 1,820.00 56315 06/17/99 001942 S C SIGNS SIGN POSTINGS/PUBLIC HEARINGS 001-120-999-5244 975.00 2,7~5.00 56316 06/17/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CONM REC CENTER/LOCKSMITH SERV 190-182-999-5212 63.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/17/99 10:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56316 06/17/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SERV/VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 70.00 133.00 56317 06/17/99 SAN GORGONIO GS TROOP 9 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 56318 06/17/99 SCATLIFFE, MARIAN REFUND: WHAT~S COOKING 190-183-4980 18.00 18.00 56319 06/17/99 002384 SECURE BUSINESS COONUN[ AUDIO/VIDEO MAINTENANCE 56320 06/17/99 003716 SO CAL CINEMAS DAY CAMP EXCURSION: TARZAN 320-199-999-5250 190-183-999-5350 2,400.00 315.00 2,400.00 315.00 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-17-214-0428/MEADOWS PWY TC1 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-19-184-0511/MARGARITA TC1 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654/VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-1353/PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-18-363-1902/PAUBA RO TC1 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3030/WINCHEST RD TC1 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3139/WINCHEST RD TC1 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-O0-397-5059/VARIOUS METERS 190-180-999-5240 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5281/RANCHO VISTA A 190-182-999-5240 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7330/VARIOUS METERS 192-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7603/VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-10-901-7962/YUKON TCI 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-05-791-8807/VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 56321 06/17/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-18-017-8972/MARGARiTA RO TC1 191-180-999-5319 56322 06/17/99 002267 SPECIAL T FIRE EQUIPMEN (7)PUB:97 FIRE INSPECTOR GUIDE 001-171-999-5228 164.06 74.96 1,524.04 690.60 72.54 140.94 162.42 4,923.13 3,728.68 25,384.56 9,225.15 142.92 4,188.51 181.23 70.00 50,603.74 70.00 56323 06/17/99 003656 SPITZFADEN, DEBI H. INTERNET TRAINING SUPPORT 320-199-999-5261 56324 06/17/99 002651 SUN BADGE COMPANY BADGE CODE ENF. #2 001-162-999-5242 56324 06/17/99 002651 SUN BAOGE COMPANY SALES TAX 001-162-999-5242 3,000.00 63.50 9.60 3,000.00 73.10 56325 06/17/99 000574 SUPERTONER CHECK/CLEAN & REPAIR HP TONER 320-199-999-5221 110.26 110.26 56326 06/17/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES/PUBLIC WORKS 001-164-604-5220 56326 06/17/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 o 56326 06/17/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 101.52 37.64 12.92 152.08 56327 06/17/99 003665 TELCO COMMUNICATIONS GR CITY HALL LONG DISTANCE SVCS 320-199-999-5208 56328 06/17/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION RET. W/H PMT#5:DUCK POND:97-17 210-2035 56328 06/17/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION PRGS PMT~5:DUCK POND:97-17CSD 210-190-143-5804 56328 06/17/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION C/O PMT~5:DUCK POND:97-17CSD 210-190-143-5804 56329 0 ,/17/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON 6TH ST SIDE/BOARDWALK REPAIRS 001-164-603-5212 56330 06/17/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-100-999-5230 56330 06/17/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-110-999-5230 56330 06/17/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-120-999-5230 56330 06/17/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERV1CE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-162-999-5230 56330 06/17/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 190-180-999-5230 1,620.07 35,795.95- 296,094.12 61,865.35 4,989.00 12.33 69.71 114.84 96.34 222.10 1,620.07 322,163.52 4,989.00 VOUCHRE2 06/17/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56330 56330 56330 56330 56330 56330 56330 56330 56331 56332 56332 10:33 CHECK DATE 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 06/17/99 VENDOR NUMBER 002702 002702 002702 002702 OOZTOZ 002702 002702 002702 003051 000345 000345 VENDOR NAME U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT CITYWIDE POTHOLE PATCHING MTR USAGE/BASE CHRG:5343COPIER PRINT CHARGES:5765 COPIER ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-170-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-111-999-5230 280-1990 001-164-601-5218 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5239 ITEM AMOUNT .33 367.36 111.10 802.74 270.06 .55 195.14 137.97 460.31 260.60 428.29 PAGE 10 CHECK AMOUNT 2,400.57 460.31 688.89 TOTAL CHECKS 631,908.69 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 11:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 12 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 iCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - C]P 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 201,776.90 7,646.12 35,278.60 287.49 75.35 7,418.61 415.67 28,856.7'5 11,533.17 1,337.86 22,013.03 3,344.20 5,360.74 TOTAL 325,344.47 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/24/99 11:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 19,290.23 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 371.06 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 3,967.48 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 9.15 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 22.95 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 301.62 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 127.96 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 127.06 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 46.02 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 865.40 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 140.42 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 535.60 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 5,019.70 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 132.23 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,241.20 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 2.51 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 6.37 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 77.63 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 34.64 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 57.73 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 24.96 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 190.68 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 MEOICARE 330-2070 40.82 35598 06/24/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 137.93 32,771.35 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 72.47 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 2.44 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 84.37 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 .96 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 9.75 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 2.16 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 4.48 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 5w119.39 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 109.51 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 742.54 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 1.62 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 3.82 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 57.68 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 22.14 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 41.89 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 14.32 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX CEDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 191.68 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 27.64 35799 06/24/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 114.81 6,623.67 56212 06/17/99 003729 PEONY CHINESE CUISINE EMPLOYEE QUARTERLY LUNCHEON 001-150-999-5265 1,000.00 1,000.00 56333 06/17/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-2175 1,257.50 56333 06/17/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-2175 637,00 lw894.50 56334 06/17/99 001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 001-150'999'5250 42.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/24/99 11:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56334 06/17/99 001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 190-180-999-5250 42.00 56336 06/23/99 002283 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL ROUM:!NTERVIEWEE:CF#81277352 190-180-999-5261 117.76 84.00 117.76 56339 06/24/99 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE APR:PROF ENG SRV:RAN CAL/I-15 210-165-601-5801 3,713.75 3,713.75 56340 06/24/99 000106 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU TROPHY CASE 340-199-701-5601 895.00 56340 06/24/99 000106 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU FREIGHT 340-199-701-5601 149.00 56340 06/24/99 000106 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU SALES TAX 340-199-701-5601 64.89 56341 06/24/99 001314 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC HOUSING ELEMENTS:DU,SB,DH,CD 001-161-999-5261 40.00 1,108.89 40.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS WTR SAFETY INSTRUCTOR MANUALS 190-180-999-5301 100.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS SWIMMING/DIVING TEXTBOOK 190-180-999-5301 180.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS INSTRUCTOR CANDIDATE TEXTBOOK 190-180-999-5301 50.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS VIDEO RENTAL 190-180-999-5301 5.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS CUMMUNITY WATER SAFETY TEXT 190-183-999-5310 91.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AHERICAN RED CROSS WTR SAFETY MANUALS:WHALE TALES 190-180-999-5261 100.00 56342 06/24/99 000936 AHER[CAN RED CROSS COMMUNITY SAFETY MANUALS 190-183-999-5310 204.00 56342 05/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS SWIM CARDS 190-180-999-5301 27.50 56342 06/24/99 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS CPR/PR & ADULT CHALLENGE 190-183-999-5310 50.00 807.50 56343 06/24/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/EO5/15/99:WILLIAMS 280-199-999-5118 56344 06/24/99 002987 ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT S ENG SURVEY SVCS:PUJOL SIDEWALK 210-165-826-5802 709,50 660.00 709.50 660.00 56345 06/24/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY LOGO HATS, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS 001-2175 339.41 56345 06/24/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY MERCHANDISE IS FOR RESALE 001-2175 24.41- 56346 06/24/99 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C MBSHP:BURON,REED,HURST,BAKER 00i-164-604-5226 172.00 56346 06/24/99 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: S. STERLING 190-180-999-5214 43.00 56346 06/24/99 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: M.WIECHEC 190-180-999-5214 43.00 315.00 258.00 56347 06/24/99 AUTUMOTIVE PAINT SERVIC RE-PAINT CAR HAULER TRAILER 001-170-999-5214 200,00 200.00 56348 06/24/99 002541 BECKER, WALTER F-J~RL CITYWIDE SAWCUTTING/PW MAINT 001-164-601-5402 4,995.00 56348 06/24/99 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL CURB/GUTTER/AC OVRLAY/RIO NEDI 001-164-601-5402 4,990.00 56349 06/24/99 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC EE COMPUTER PRGM: RETA WESTON 001-1175 770.98 9,985.00 770.98 56350 06/24/99 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS COPIER SUPPLIES FOR MINOLTA 330-199-999-5220 177.89 177.89 56351 06/24/99 000901 C P R S '99 RECREATION LEADER TRAINING 190-180-999-5261 150.00 150,00 56352 0b/24/99 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES CITY VEHICLE INSURANCE 300-199-999-5200 453.00 56352 06/24/99 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES CITY VEHICLE INSURANCE 300-199-999-5200 572.00 1,025.00 56353 06/24/99 001155 CALIF PUBLIC SECTOR UPDATED DIRECTORY:FED/STATE/LO 001-120'999-5250 307.95 307.95 56354 06/24/99 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 1,096.36 1,096.36 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 11:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56355 06/24/99 001249 56355 06/24/99 001249 56355 06/24/99 001249 56356 06/24/99 001193 CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV COMP U S A INC JOHN MEYER MANAGEMENT ACADEMY JOHN MEYER MANAGEMENT ACADEMY RON PARKS MANAGEMENT ACADEMY MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 165-199-999-5261 280-199-999-5261 001-163-999-5261 320-199-999-5221 875.00 875.00 1,750.00 143.86 3,500.00 143.86 56357 06/24/99 000442 56357 06/24/99 000442 56358 06/24/99 002945 56358 06/24/99 002945 56358 06/24/99 002945 56358 06/24/99 002945 56358 06/24/99 002945 56358 06/24/99 002945 56358 06/24/99 002945 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UPS REPLACEMENT BATTERIES SALES TAX CITY HALL ELECTRONIC BALLASTS FREIGHT SALES TAX CRC ELECT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS CRC ELECT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS CRC ELECT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS CRC ELECT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 340-199-701-5212 340-199-701-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 2,200.00 170.50 476.00 25.00 38.83 183.18 53.88 80.81 75.43 2,370.50 933.13 56359 06/24/99 COSTCO 56360 06/24/99 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP 56360 06/24/99 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP REFUND: LD93-147C0 BOND PP224 HEAVYWEIGHT PAPER:GIS PLOTTER HEAVYWEIGHT PAPER:GIS PLOTTER 001-2670 001-161-610-5220 001-161-610-5220 52,336.00 372.79 17.50 52,336.00 390.29 56361 06/24/99 DELAROSA, OLIVIA 56361 06/24/99 DELAROSA, OLIVIA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT ADDITIONAL ROOM RENTAL 190-2900 190-183-4990 100.00 30.00- 70.00 56362 06/24/99 003384 DRAIN PATROL SERV CALL/TOILET/FIRE STN 84 001-171-999-5212 69.00 69.00 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA NED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 0~/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED 56363 06/24/99 002981 DYNA MED SUPPLIES FOR BACKBOARDS SPEED-CLIP LONG FOR BACKBOARDS FREIGHT SALES TAX DISPOSABLE LATEX GLOVES-LARGE LARGE COLD PACKS - 4 BOXES CONFORM-STRETCH BANDAGES TRI-BANDAGES FOR AQUATICS RELEASE-NON-ADHERING DRESSING FREIGHT SALES TAX 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 189.00 63.80 5.00 18.69 18.20 26.00 14.50 20.50 19.40 5.00 7.51 387.60 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/EO6/O4/99:MILES, N TEMP HELP W/EO6/O4/99:MILES, N TEMP HELP W/EO6/O4/99:MILES, N TEMP HELP W/EO6/O4/99:THORNSLE TEMP HELP W/E 6/04 DE GANGE TEMP HELP W/EO6/O4/99:HILLBERG TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 SERVEN TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 SERVEN TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 SERVEN TEMP HELP W/E 05/21MENDOZA TEMP HELP W/E 05/21MENDOZA TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 MENDOZA 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-165-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 165-199-999-5118 001-164-603-5118 190-180-999-5118 193-180-999-5118 340-199-701-5118 330-199-999-5118 330-199-999-5118 118.66 415.30 415.30 2,177.09 2,858.40 1,233.60 371.14 371.14 733.44 663.00 663.00 397.80 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/24/99 11:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT [TEN NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56364 06/24/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 MENDOZA 340-199-701-5118 397.80 56365 06/24/99 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC APR PRGSS:MARGARITA COMM PRK 210-190-119-5804 5,079.90 56365 06/24/99 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC RETENTION:APR PRGSS:MARG PARK 210-2035 507.99- 10,815.67 4,571.91 56366 06/24/99 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION GEOTECHNICAL SRVCS:OVERLAND CR 210-165-604-5804 2,177.50 2,177.50 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPROV: SOCCER FIELD 190-180-999-5415 650.00 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPROV:BUTTERFIELD 190-180-999-5415 1,800.00 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPROV:BUTTERF]ELD 190-180-999-5415 750.00 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP ]MPROV:BUTTERFIELD 190-180-999-5415 750.00 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPROV:R.C.SPTS PRK 190-180-999-5415 1,800.00 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP REPAIRS:SPRTS PRK 190-180-999-5415 94.05 56367 06/24/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE BALLFIELD PREP:TEM MIDDLE SCHL 190-180-999-5415 1,075.00 6,919.05 56368 06/24/99 002037 EXPANETS TELEPHONE MAINT & REPAIRS 320-199-999-5215 44.00 44.00 56369 06/24/99 003053 FAGAN, MATTHEW 6/26 PRESENTATION:SAM HICKS PK 190-183-999-5370 56370 06/24/99 003633 FASTRAK DBA:LOCKHEED MA FASTRAK TRAMSPONDER - RDA DEPT 280-199-999-5250 150.00 180.00 150.00 180.00 56371 06/24/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 190-180-999-5230 38.50 56371 05/24/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 7.50 56371 06/24/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230 34.75 56371 06/24/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-1990 15.75 56372 06/24/99 000160 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORT 280-199-813-5804 150.00 96.50 150.00 56373 06/24/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-2576 S.NELSON: PROF MTGS 001-110-999-5260 31.93 56373 06/24/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-5288 S.JONES:MDSPRG/BEYON 320-199-999-5211 74.90 56373 06/24/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-5288 S.JONES:TKT DENVER 001-120-999-5261 481.70 56373 06/24/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-5288 S.JONES:COUNCIL MTG 001-100-999-5260 76.56 665.09 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC (6) PRINTER CABLES 320-199-999-5221 191.94 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC (6) ZIP DRIVES 320-199-999-5221 599.70 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 15.75 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 61.35 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 899.00 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 9.50 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 69.67 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC COMPUTER BASELINE HUB 320-199-999-5242 603.00 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS ]NC COMPUTER INTERFACE MODULE 320-199-999-5242 153.00 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 12.50 56374 06/24/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 58.59 2,674.00 56375 06/24/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 197-0073 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 2,320.21 56375 06/24/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 197-0074 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 336.44 56375 00/24/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-3564 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 55.20 2,711.85 56376 06/24/99 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA BINDER SUPPLIES - COPY CENTER 330-199-999-5220 22.06 22.06 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/24/99 11:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56377 06/24/99 GIDEON, CAROLINE W. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 56378 06/24/99 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. CONSULTING-INTERAGENCY LIAISON 001-110-999-5248 500.00 56378 06/24/99 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. CONSULTING-INTERAGENCY LIAISON 001-164-604-5248 500.00 56378 06/24/99 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. MAY PROF SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE 210-165-631-5801 5,000.00 56379 06/24/99 002528 GLASS BLASTERS REPLACE DAMAGED GLASSWARE 001-100-999-5260 116.37 100,00 6,000.00 116.37 56380 06/24/99 00017'/GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 175.02 56380 06/24/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 59.65 56380 06/24/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 165-199-999-5220 19.64 56380 06/24/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 19.64 56380 06/24/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 61.34 56380 06/24/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 165-199-999-5220 61.34 396.63 56381 06/24/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (20) BACKUP TAPES 320-199-999-5221 1,319,80 56381 06/24/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (5) FLOPPY DISKS 320-199-999-5221 94.95 56381 06/24/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE COMPUTER PAPER 320-199-999-5221 106.50 56381 06/24/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (12) DUST BLASTERS 320-199-999-5221 64.20 56381 06/24/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 50.67 56381 06/24/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 124.94 1,761.06 56382 06/24/99 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPAN (24) HANDSFREE PHONES 320-199-999-5242 1,216.32 56382 06/24/99 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPAN FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 30.00 56382 06/24/99 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPAN SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 94.26 56383 06/24/99 001550 GROSSMONT BANK REL RETENTION TO ESCROW:APR 210-1035 507.99 1,340.58 507.99 56384 06/24/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5212 204.44 56384 06/24/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5212 460.36 664.80 56385 06/24/99 HARMONY ARTISTS INC. 56386 06/24/99 003685 HASSON, SAMUEL JULY 4TH MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT SWING INN PAINT PROJECT 190-180-999-5301 800.00 800.00 280-199-813-5804 5,000.00 5,000.00 56387 0C/24/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,524.70 56387 06/24/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 18.75 56387 06/24/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 OEF COMP 190-2080 175.00 56387 06/24/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 6.25 1,724.70 56388 06/24/99 003696 INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE LTD GOV'T WORKSTATION LICENSE 320-199-999-5211 1,485.00 56388 06/24/99 003696 INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE LTD COMPUTER UPGRADE DISCOUNT 320-199-999-5211 371.25- 56388 06/24/99 003696 INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE LTD FREIGHT 320-199-999-5211 15.00 1,128.75 56389 06/24/99 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 148.16 148.16 56390 06/24/99 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 295.77 295.77 56391 06/24/99 003740 ITT INDUSTRIES "NIGHT RESCUE" SCOPE:POLICE 001'170-999-5610 1,010.00 1,010.00 56392 06/24/99 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT MAY:PROF SVCS:TEM SHUTTLE PROP 280-199-999-5250 1,297.50 1,297.50 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56393 56394 56395 56395 56396 56397 56397 56397 56397 56397 56398 56399 56400 56401 56401 56401 56402 56402 56402 56403 56404 56404 56405 56405 56405 56406 56406 56406 56407 56407 56407 56407 56407 56407 56407 56408 11:11 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 0C/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 002779 KUHNS, ALLIE 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI 003714 LIFEGUARD LIFT INC 003714 LIFEGUARD LIFT INC 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONHIS 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I MCCLINTOCK~ KATHY 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING 003678 003678 003678 MILLENNIUM III SYSTEMS MILLENNIUM III SYSTEMS MILLENNIUM Ill SYSTEMS 000228 000228 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO 002903 MORRIS, ROBERT D. 003139 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS 003139 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS 002139 002139 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 002105 002105 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003700 OLYMPIC CREATIONS 003735 PACIFIC BELL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMB:EXPENSE-JAPANESE GUESTS BALLFIELD LIGHT REPAIR:R.VISTA CEMENT IN SLEEVE ANCHOR:T.ELEM HANDICAP LIFT:TEM ELEM POOL REGISTRATION:99 AHWAHNEE AWARD TEMP HELP W/E 6/06 LUQUE TEMP HELP (2)W/E 6/06 BELIAN TEMP HELP (2)W/E 6/06 BELIAN TEMP HELP W/E 6/06 BRONMET TEMP HELP W/E 6/06 BROMMET TRAFFIC SIGNS:R.C./YNEZ RD REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT MAY REIMB.EXP.:R.C./I15:95-12 HP SCANJET 6200C COMPUTER HARDWARE SALES TAX FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES SIGN FOR OLD TOWN LOCATE/TERMINATE CABLE:MUSEUM INSTALL CONDUIT:MUSEUM-SR.CTR. RECRUITMENT ADS:PARK AIDE RECRUITMENT ADS:PARK/LDSCP TEC RECRUITMENT ADS:ENGINEERING CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & HAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & HAINT 3D FIREWORKS GLASSES FREIGHT SALES TAX GLOW IN DARK 320Z CUPS SET-UP CHARGE FREIGHT SALES TAX MISC. PHONE EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-101-999-5280 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 001-161-999-5226 340-199-701-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-150-999-5118 001-150-999-5118 001-164-602-5412 190-2900 210-165-601-5801 320-199-999-5Z42 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 001-170-999-5262 001-164-601-5263 001-164-604-5263 280-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5250 001-150-999-5254 001-150-999-5254 001-150-999-5254 001-163-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 320-199-999-5242 ITEM AMOUNT 98.15 430.50 64.50 686.36 50.00 169.12 505.04 336.69 62.03 216.61 513.97 100.00 20.27 385.00 1,044.72 110.80 124.36 16.04 17.70 2,480.00 997.00 2,450.00 68.99 101.02 107.52 134.41 15.95 153.73 756.00 22.77 58.59 580.00 40.00 62.95 48.05 488.95 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 98.15 430.50 730.86 50.00 1,289.49 513.97 100.00 20.27 1,540.52 158.10 2,480.00 3,447.00 277.53 304.09 1,568.36 488.95 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56409 56410 56411 56411 56411 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 56412 11:11 CHECK DATE 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 0~/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 VENDOR NUMBER 003021 003021 003021 003021 003021 003021 003021 003021 003021 0030Zl 003021 003021 003021 003021 003589 002800 002800 002800 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 VENDOR NAME PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER PACIFIC COAST ENTERPRIS PACIFIC STRIPING INC PACIFIC STRIPING INC PACIFIC STRIPING INC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR 4/9-5/8/99 CELLULAR ACCOUNT NUMBER STREET ADDRESSING PHONE SVCS 001-140-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 190-180-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-163-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-164-601-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-164-604-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-1990 PHONE SVCS 320-199-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-1990 PHONE SvCS 280-199-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-161-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-162-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-100-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-110-999-5208 PHONE SVCS 001-150-999-5208 RE-STRIPING STREETS:CITYWIDE RE-STRIPING STREETS:CITYWIDE RE-STRIPING STREETS:CITYWlDE 001-162-999-5250 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 001-164-601-5410 001-164-601-5410 001-164-601-5410 PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS RET PERS-PRE PERS-PRE PERS-PRE PERS-PRE PERS-PRE SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 191-2130 192-2130 193-2130 194-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 ITEM AMOUNT 57.11 451.14 449.15 108.72 223.95 381.87 275.66 147.69 65.02 113.40 641.83 237.25 284.00 57.09 450.00 4,950.00 2,134.50 2,865.50 25,178.66 693.67 4,055.81 13.31 33.94 407.94 196.67 301.74 130.52 723.40 142.40 523.43 100.64 2.81 5.63 39.33 8.42 76.73 1.87 14.80 .05 .14 1.52 .84 .92 .46 1.86 .93 2.18 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 3,493.88 450.00 9,950. O0 32,660.62 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56414 56415 56416 56416 56416 56416 56416 56416 56417 56417 56418 56419 56419 56419 56419 56419 56419 56419 56420 56420 56420 56420 56421 56421 56421 56422 56423 56424 56425 56425 56426 56427 56427 56427 56428 56429 11:11 CHECK DATE 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 VENDOR NUMBER 001958 000254 000254 000254 000254 000254 000254 002776 002776 003493 000635 000635 000635 000635 000635 000635 000635 000947 000947 000947 000947 000262 000262 000262 003591 000418 000268 003001 003001 002743 000278 000278 000278 002864 VENDOR NAME PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO PISCULLI, MARTHA PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRIME MATRIX INC PRIME MATRIX INC PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT ROSS FENCE COMPANY ROSS FENCE COMPANY SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE SEA WORLD OF CALIFORNIA SHEPARD, PEGGY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 001958 PERS L-T REFUND: SWIM LESSONS PUBLIC NOTICE:PA99-O082 PUBLIC NOTICE:TCSD PUBLIC NOTICE:PA99-0145 PUBLIC NOTICE:PH 335 PUBLIC NOTICE:PA99-0160 PUBLIC NOTICE:PW97-25CSD MAY:SC-5001339-O:K.LINDEMANS MAY:SC-5003948-6:INFO SYSTEM RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:S.SM]TH WHITE ROUND TABLECLOTHS BLACK ROUND TABLECLOTHS WHITE RECTANGLE TABLECLOTHS BLACK/WHITE CHECKERED NAPKINS 10% DISCOUNT FREIGHT SALES TAX DUPL.BLUEPRINTS:OVERLAND DRIVE DUPL.BLUEPRINTS:NA[NT,FAC, DUPL.BLUEPRINTS:PLANNING DUPL. BLUEPRINTS:S,GERTRUDIS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS CITYWIDE R-O-W HERBICIDE SPRAY MAY APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES MAY 99 K-RAT PAYMENT CREDIT:OVER CONTRACT AMOUNT RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:S.SMITH LOCKSMITH SERVICES:MARG. PARK RECRUITMENT AD:ACCOUNTANT RECRUITMENT AD:ACCOUNTANT CREDIT:ADVERTISEMENT ERROR TKTS:EXCHANGE PRG:CF#280335 REFUND: FIELD RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2122 190-183-4975 001-161-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-100-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 165-199-813-5804 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 210-165-604-5804 210-190-158-5802 001-161-999-5222 190-180-999-5268 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-164-601-5402 001-163-999-5250 001-2300 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 190-180-999-5212 001-150-999-5254 001-150-999-5254 001-150-999-5254 001-101-999-5280 190-183-4988 ITEM AMOUNT 73.84 25.00 18.50 122.20 16.25 20.00 16.50 37.00 42.55 27.20 820.00 72.00 72.00 56.00 37.50 25,59- 15.00 18.40 43.96 54.40 14.10 48.36 2,182.20 28.79 5,766.07 2,800.00 5.00 1,500.00 40.00- 2,970.00 60.37 203.10 203.10 203.10- 605.20 30.00 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 73.84 25.00 230.45 69.75 820.00 245.31 160.82 7,977.06 2,800.00 5.00 1,500.00 2,930.00 60.37 203.10 605,20 30.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 06/24/99 11:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56430 06/24/99 003548 SKY CANYON ENTERPRISES HANGAR RENTAL:MUSEUM ARTIFACTS 190-185-999-5250 747.00 747.00 56431 06/24/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC EMP.RECOGNITION PRGM SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5265 56431 06/24/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 56431 06/24/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 56431 06/24/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 56431 06/24/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 33.54 53.69 267.03 56.66 40.88 451.80 56432 06/24/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-13-O79-2377:HWY 79 TCl 191-180-999-5319 56432 06/24/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:Z-O2-351-6800:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 56432 06/24/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-373-9903:MARGARITA 190-180-999-5240 190.27 38.98 1,774.29 2,003.54 56433 06/24/99 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:O21-725-O775-4:SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5240 56433 06/24/99 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:O91-O24-9300-5:CRC 190-182-999-5240 56433 06/24/99 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:O95-167-7907-2:STN ~f84 001-171-999-5240 56433 06/24/99 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:101-525-O950-O:TCC 190-184-999-5240 56433 06/24/99 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:133-O40-7~73-O:MAINT. FAC. 340-199-702-5240 33.39 1,501.97 88.92 26.08 29.41 1,679.77 56434 06/24/99 SOLTYSIAK, RICH REIMB:PLAN.INSTITUTE:3/23-27 001-161-999-5272 381.10 381.10 56435 06/24/99 000574 SUPERTONER MISC. PRINTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 56435 06/24/99 000574 SUPERTONER MISC. PRINTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 56435 06/24/99 000574 SUPERTONER LASER PRINTER MAINTENANCE SVCS 320-199-999-5215 545.58 158.39 536.67 1,240.64 56436 06/24/99 003449 T H E SOILS COMPANY MAY PROF. SVCS:WINCH./YNEZ RD 210-165-683-5804 56436 06/24/99 003449 T H E SOILS COMPANY APR PROF. SVCS:MARG./OVERLAND 210-165-681-5804 1,751.00 2,304.00 4,055.00 56437 06/24/99 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL MAY SUPPORT SVC:OVERLAND:95-11 210-165-604-5804 56437 06/24/99 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL MAY DESIGN SVCS:OVERLAND:95-11 210-165-604-5801 56437 06/24/99 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL MAY SUPPORT SVC:PALA RD:97-15 210-165-631-5801 1,851.95 2,275.00 3,725.00 7,851.95 56438 06/24/99 000305 TARGET STORE SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS 190-184-999-5301 20.40 20.40 56439 06/24/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC LUCENT WAVELAN KIT 001-110-999-5610 56439 06/24/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC LUCENT LOW LOSS CABLE 001-110-999-5610 56439 06/24/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC FREIGHT 001-110-999-5610 56439 06/24/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC SALES TAX 001-110-999-5610 4,098.00 390.00 40.00 347.82 4,875.82 56440 06/24/99 TEMECULA BALLOON & WINE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 56440 06/24/99 TEMECULA BALLOON & WINE ADD'L HRS RENTAL 190-183-4990 100.00 27.00- 73.00 56441 06/24/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE CORRECTION FROM 6/10/99:STONE 001-1020 56442 06/24/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES-MAINT. FAC. 340-199-702-5212 56442 06/24/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 140.00 59.00 185.00 140.00 244.00 56443 06/24/99 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIG.SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS 56443 06/24/99 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIG.SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 268.14 247.68 515.82 56444 06/24/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-999-5263 155.76 56444 06/24/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-170-999-5262 8.13 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 11:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56444 06/24/99 000919 56444 06/24/99 000919 56444 06/24/99 000919 56444 06/24/99 000919 56444 06/24/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 190-180-999-5263 001-163-999-5263 001-164-601-526~ 001-164-604-5263 001-165-999-5263 479.87 235.20 610.76 182.02 115.17 1,786.91 56446 06/24/99 001483 56446 06/24/99 001483 56446 06/24/99 001483 TOO DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOO DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOO DODSON & ASSOCIATES MAR PROF SVCS:REGIONAL CTR. APR PROF. SVCS:REGIONAL CTR. MAY PROF, SVCS:REGIONAL CTR, 001-2620 001-2620 001-2620 720.00 643.75 100.00 1,463.75 56447 06/24/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON ADD'L WORK:O.T. BOARDWALK 56447 06/24/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON ADD'L WORK:O.T. BOARDWALK 001-164-601-5402 001-164-603-5212 4,891.75 105.00 4,996.75 56448 06/24/99 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONEER MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5220 336.34 336,34 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COOP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COOP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 56450 06/24/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COOP 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 8,160.03 210.23 1,619.77 2.50 33.38 25.00 85.23 96.34 610.91 158.34 11,001.73 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 56451 06/24/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 1,830.30 163.03 1,265.44 56.39 146.22 32.40 67.12 3,560.90 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 U~ 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 U~ 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 56452 06/24/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 U~ 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 300-2120 320-2120 330-2120 222.10 3.73 19.00 1.25 .24 3.66 5.00 255.00 56453 06/24/99 002850 UNIV OF CALIF L A SUBDIV.MAP ACT:THORNSLEY:6/04 001-161-999-5261 275.00 275.00 56454 06/24/99 UNIVERSAL STUDIOS HOLLY TCKTS:EXCHANGE PRGM:CF#069107 001-101'999-5280 590.00 590.00 56455 06/24/99 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE APR PLAN CK SVCS:H~Y79S/LA PAZ 210-165-662-5802 200.00 200.00 56456 06/24/99 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH AD DESIGN FOR BUSINESS AD 001-111-999-5270 56456 0A/24/99 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH TAX ON $765.00 ONLY/BAL NO TX 001-111-999-5270 56456 06/24/99 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH DESIGN SVCS:PROOO.BROCHURES 001-111-999-5270 2,000.00 59.28 1,050.37 3,109.65 VOUCHRE2 06/24/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56457 56457 56457 56458 56445 56449 11:11 CHECK DATE 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 06/24/99 VENDOR NUMBER 000345 000345 000345 000919 003228 VENDOR NAME XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ YONKER# JADA TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MISC. PRINTER SUPPLIES MISC. COPIER SUPPLIES MISC. COPIER SUPPLIES REIMB: A/P WKSHP:06/7-8/99 FACILITIES FEE RVRSD CO CO-OP AGRMT:H-79S/I15 ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-140-999-5261 190-183-999-5370 001-164-602-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 510,74 86.20 1,094.74 77.41 30.00 16,393.90 PAGE 11 CHECK AMOUNT 1,691.68 77.41 30.00 16,393,90 TOTAL CHECKS 325,344.47 VOUCHRE2 07/01/99 11:32 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- L(N/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERV%CES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 89,952.12 6,177.47 28,229.21 549.04 1,406.29 7S9,066.78 453.50 11,938.28 3,248,79 2,173.30 15,123.65 14,437.42 TOTAL 912,755.85 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56468 06/24/99 002144 INTL DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATI ENTRY FEE FOR IDA AWARDS 280-199-999-5250 250.00 250.00 56469 06/24/99 003280 JON LASKIN BAND FINAL PYT:CONCERT SERIES-6/27 190-183-999-5370 550.00 550.00 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS 56470 06/25/99 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH WATSON & GERSH MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 99 LEGAL SERVICES CREDIT:S/B BILL TO MISS.VIEJO 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 210-165-604-5801 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 261-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 210-165-604-5801 210-165-604'5801 210-165-604-5801 210-165-631-5801 300-199-999-5246 280-1990 165-199-999-5246 280-1990 165-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 10,329.33 3,084.50 1,566.92 6,058.79 417.05 403.00 57.00 393.88 62.50 246.75 787.23 453.50 220.35 301.00 1,533.70 587.50 325.00 38.60 5,105.70 38.82 443.99 41.28 1,258.50- 31,237.89 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 [NSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 [NSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 [NSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 [NSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 ]NSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 ]NSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX 98600 06/30/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) ([RS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MED[CARE 000283 MED[CARE 000283 MED[CARE 000283 MED[CARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 340-2070 3,821.52 122.51 661.13 12.74 40.84 335.43 94.72 1,208.42 62.16 193.68 4.42 26.96 3.84 58.14 30.36 6,676.87 98790 06/30/99 000444 INSTATAX 98790 06/30/99 000444 INSTATAX 98790 06/30/99 000444 ]NSTATAX 98790 06/30/99 000444 INSTATAX 98790 06/30/99 000444 INSTATAX 98790 06/30/99 000444 [NSTATAX 98790 06/30/99 000444 ]NSTATAX (EDD) (EDD) (EDD) (EDD) (EDD) (EDD) (EDD) 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 340-2070 1,114.63 32.10 121.46 2.06 10.70 66.83 13.67 1,361.45 VOUCHRE2 07/01/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56473 56474 56475 56476 56476 56476 56476 56477 56478 56479 56480 56480 56480 56480 56480 '56480 56481 56481 56481 56481 56482 56482 56482 56482 56483 56484 56484 56485 56486 56487 56488 56488 56488 56488 56489 11:32 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 001587 A P W A APWA WKSHP MTG:W.HUGHES:07/15 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIA MISC SUPPLIES-TINYTOTS/DAYCANP 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC 28567998 LT DONENOE 002410 002410 002410 002410 A WONANfS TOUCH BUILDIN A WOMANfS TOUCH BUILDIN A WONAN~S TOUCH BUILDIN A WONAN~S TOUCH BUILDIN JUN JANITORIAL SVCS:WINCH CRK JUN JANITORIAL SVCS: CITY PRKS JUN JANITORIAL SVCS: CITY PRKS JUN JANITORIAL SVCS:MARGARITA 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SVCS:BUTTERFIELD BSKBAL 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP:STEPHEN L. BROWN 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS RED CROSS PROCESS FEES 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY SEW CONM SVC LOGO ON JACKETS TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE KOOZIES (CAN COOLERS) FRISBEES FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL COPYRIGHT FEE FOR LOGO (TEAM SALES TAX 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGER, THE (5000) FIRE PREVENTION BADGES (2) PERSONALIZED PLATE CHRGE (2000)DETECTOR INSPECTOR BADGE FREIGHT 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC 1 SONY MAVICA DIGITAL CAMERA 1 SONY MAVICA DIGITAL CAMERA SALES TAX SALES TAX 002871 BOYKIN, EDWARD W. MISC ELECTRONIC EQUIP A/V 002208 BUSINESS PRESS, THE 002208 BUSINESS PRESS, THE CITY GUIDE ADVERTISEMENT ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:CITY MNGR 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES POLICY RENEWAL:TBD/EQUIP FLOAT 000486 CALIF MUNICIPAL BUSINES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: Z. SMITH 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: H.PARKER 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS INSTALL CiTY HALL FIRE ALARM 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS PROXIMITY CARD READER BATTERY 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS LABOR 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS SALES TAX 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET INSTALL MOBILE RADIO:TCSD ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-604-5260 190-183-999-5340 001-170-999-5208 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-164-603-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5248 001-161-999-5226 190-180-999-5261 190-180-999-5243 001-2175 001-2175 001-2175 001-150-999-5265 001-2175 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 001-163-999-5242 001-164-604-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-164-604-5242 320-199-999-5210 001-111-999-5270 001-110-999-5228 300-199-999-5200 001-140-999-5226 190-180-999-5226 340-199-701-5610 340-199-701-5610 340-199-701-5610 340-199-701-5610 190-180-999-5214 ITEM AMOUNT 35.00 99.51 167.63 211.00 1,722.00 211.00 211.00 169.88 282.00 25.00 15.09 836.00 260.00 312.50 750.00 44.37 192.00 90.00 74.00 11.00 500.00 499.99 38.75 38.75 75.96 1,000.00 49.00 2,986.00 50.00 385.00 3,500.00 855.00 178.00 66.26 295.86 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 35.00 99.51 167.63 2,355.00 169.88 282.00 25.00 2,217.96 367.00 1,077.49 75.96 1,049.00 2,986.00 50.00 385.00 4,599.26 295.86 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEH AMOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 56490 07/01/99 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS BRONZE PLAQUES FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362 1,056.28 1,056.28 56491 07/01/99 003189 CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FIRE PREVENTION ACADEMY:PISTER 001-171-999-5261 153.00 153.00 56492 07/01/99 001629 CREATIVE HYDROSEED INC HYDROSEED T.VLY MUSEUH GROUNDS 190-180-999-5415 550.20 550.20 56493 07/01/99 002661 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC INC REPAIR EOC GENERATOR @ CRC 340-199-701-5215 56493 07/01/99 002661 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC INC REPAIR EOC GENERATOR @ CRC 340-199-701-5215 56493 07/01/99 002661 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC INC REPAIR EOC GENERATOR @ CRC 340-199-701-5215 56493 07/01/99 002661 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC INC CREDIT: UNAPPROVED WORK 340-199-701-5215 175,00 200.00 321.42 321.42- 375.00 56494 07/01/99 001009 D B X INC REL RETENTION:PRJT PW97-29 001-2035 1,026.00 1,026.00 56495 07/01/99 003511 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATI NOTEBOOK COMPUTER:POLICE DEPT 56495 07/01/99 003511 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATI FREIGHT 56495 07/01/99 003511 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATI SALES TAX 001-170-999-5604 001-170-999-5604 001-170-999-5604 2,344.00 23.00 183.49 2,550.49 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 340-199-702-5610 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 340-199-701-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-180-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-181-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-184-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-184-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 340-199-702-5610 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 340-199-701-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-180-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-181-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-184-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-184-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 340-199-702-5610 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 340-199-701-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-180-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-181-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-184-999-5242 56496 07/01/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY TOOLS FOR FACILITIES AND PARKS 190-184-999-5242 388.40 140.07 101.34 22.63 22.63 22.63 61.46 22.16 16.04 3.58 3.58 3.58 562.81 202.96 146.85 32.79 32.79 32.80 1,819.10 56497 07/01/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEHP HELP W/E 6/13 UIGHTMAN 56497 07/01/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP U/E 6/20 WlGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 001-111-999-5118 260.00 260.00 520.00 56498 07/01/99 003317 DOMENOE, CHERYL REIMB:COUNCIL MTG SUPPLIES 001-100-999-5260 58.19 58.19 56499 07/01/99 003610 DOMENOE, JIM REIMB:APPREC[ATION LUNCHEON 001-1990 114.86 114.86 56500 07/01/99 002981 DYNA HED 1 BODY SPLINT FOR FIRE DEPT. 001-171-999-5242 56500 07/01/99 002981 DYNA MED SALES TAX 001-171-999-5242 139.75 10.83 150.58 56501 07/01/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP ~/E 6/18 KEELEY 001-163-999-5118 56501 07/01/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 6/18 KEELEY 001-164-604-5118 56501 07/01/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 THORNSLEY 001-161-999-5118 56501 07/01/99 001380 E S ] EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 THORNSLEY 001-161-999-5118 56501 07/01/99 001380 E S [ EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP ~/E 06/18 HILLBERG 165-199-999-5118 268.93 2,420.35 178.52 1,893.65 1,233.60 5,995.05 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEH NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56502 07/01/99 002125 EMERGENCY PET CLINIC EMERG. VETERINARY SVCS: K-9 001-170-999-5327 22.00 22.00 56503 07/01/99 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION APR/MAY GEOTECHNICAL SVC:WINCH 210-165-686-5804 252.50 252.50 56504 07/01/99 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN REFRESHMENTS FOR 5/10 MTG 190-180-999-5260 50.91 56504 07/01/99 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN REFRESHMENT FOR COUNCIL MTGS 001-100-999-5260 92.01 142.92 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 50.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 240,00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 150,00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 35.20 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 250,00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 35.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VETERANS PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 127.50 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MIRADA LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS 193-180-999-5415 480.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NAKAYAMA PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 240.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VOORBURG PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 600.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VOORBURG PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENT 190-180-999-5415 600.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE TCC LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS 190-184-999-5415 1,500.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE TEM SPT PRK LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS 190-180-999-5415 510.00 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE TEM SPT PRK LDSCP REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 48.67 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE WINCHESTER RD LDSCP REPAIRS 193-180-999-5212 68.53 56505 07/01/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE SPORTS PARK LDSCP REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 618.42 5,553.32 56506 07/01/99 000478 FAST SIGNS SIGN FOR POLICE DEPT USAGE 001-170-999-5220 11.37 56506 07/01/99 000478 FAST SIGNS STRIP & RESTORE OLD TWN BANNER 280-199-999-5362 53.88 65.25 56507 07/01/99 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO RECONVEYANCE FEE FOR BASS 165-199-813-5804 77.00 77.00 56508 07/01/99 003158 FRANKLIN HAYNES MARRION JUL 4TH:MARIONETTE PUPPET SHOW 190-183-999-5370 250.00 250.00 56509 07/01/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-2626 POLICE DEPT 001-1990 322.07 56509 07/01/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-6506 JEFF STONE 320-199-999-5208 25.09 56509 07/01/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 82.38 429.54 56510 07/01/99 002819 GARWIN & CHAN ASSOCIATE MISC AUDIO/VIDEO SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5210 393.29 393.29 56511 07/01/99 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5214 240.00 240.00 56512 07/01/99 HARRIS, MICHELLE REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 190-183-4984 75.00 75.00 56513 07/01/99 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 001-150-999-5248 411.80 411.80 56514 07/01/99 002906 HEMET FENCE COMPANY RESIDENTIAL PRGM: LOPEZ, CESAR 165-199-813-5804 3,395.00 3,395.00 56515 07/01/99 003709 HEMET RUBBER STAMP RUBBER STAMP (911,STOP, SD&R) 001-171-999-5296 11.Z5 56515 07/01/99 003709 HEMET RUBBER STAMP FREIGHT 001-171-999-5296 1.00 56515 07/01/99 003709 HEMET RUBBER STAMP SALES TAX 001-171-999-5296 .87 56515 07/01/99 003709 HEMET RUBBER STAMP RUBBERT STAMP (911, STOP,SD&R 001-171-999-5296 33.75 56515 07/01/99 003709 HEMET RUBBER STAMP FREIGHT 001-171-999-5296 1.00 56515 07/01/99 003709 HEMET RUBBER STAMP SALES TAX 001-171-999-5296 2.61 50.48 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ]TEN NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56516 07/01/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEN POLICE 001-170-999-5214 1,868.09 56516 07/01/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5214 129.80 56516 07/01/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5214 453.17 56516 07/01/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR TEN POLICE 001-170-999-5214 26.00 2,477.06 56517 07/01/99 INGRAHAM, MILES REFUND: PCP PICNIC SHELTER 190-183-4988 25.00 25.00 56518 07/01/99 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 177.79 177.79 56519 07/01/99 000750 INTOXIMETERS INC REPAIR OF ALCO-SENSOR IV 001-170-999-5215 258.74 258.74 56520 07/01/99 003727 JOHNSON, LYNNETTA JEAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 612.00 612.00 56521 07/01/99 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES ENG CONSULTANT SVCS:PLAN CKS 001-163-999-5248 3,675.00 3,675.00 56522 07/01/99 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 100 BANNER/FLAGS FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362 4,500.00 56522 07/01/99 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC FREIGHT 280-199-999-5362 70.00 56522 07/01/99 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362 348.75 4,918.75 56523 07/01/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 6/20 MUELLER 001-120-999-5118 293.80 293.80 56524 07/01/99 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:CANDIDATE FOR MUSEUM MNGR 190-180-999-5250 1,508.60 1,508.60 56525 07/01/99 002281 LASSIG CONSTRUCTION WINCHESTER CRK MONUMENT PLAQUE 190-180-999-5212 995.00 995.00 56526 07/01/99 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC 56526 07/01/99 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC TRAUMA KIT FOR CITY FACILITIES 001-110-999-5278 1,016.20 SALES TAX 001-110-999-5278 73.67 1,089.87 56527 07/01/99 003274 LING AUDIO PRODUCTION S SOUND SYSTEM-JULY 4TH EVENT 190-183-999-5370 1,100.00 1,100.00 56528 07/01/99 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY ROTO TRIM PAPER CUTTER 330'199'999-5220 461.00 56528 07/01/99 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY DRILL BITS FOR PAPER DRILL 330-199'999'5220 29.00 56528 07/01/99 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY CUTTING BLADES FOR LG. CUTTER 330-199-999-5220 378.00 56528 07/01/99 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY CUTTING STICKS 330-199-999-5220 50.60 56528 07/01/99 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220 16.00 56528 07/01/99 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY SALES TAX 330-199-999-5220 71.19 1,005.79 56529 07/01/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 6/13 BROMMET 56529 07/01/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 6/13 LUQUE 001-150-999-5118 243.81 340-199-701-5118 211.40 455.21 56530 07/01/99 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC 56530 07/01/99 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC STATIONARY SUPPLIES:ECON.DEV. 001-111-999-5222 110.00 SALES TAX 001-111-999-5222 8.53 118.53 56531 07/01/99 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I TRAFFIC CONTROL EQUIP:RC RAMP 210-165-605-5804 4,116.05 56531 07/01/99 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I TRAFFIC SIGNALS:VAR.LOCATIONS 001-164-602-5244 1,200.00 56531 07/01/99 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY [ SALES TAX 001-164-602-5244 93,00 5,409.05 56532 07/01/99 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING MAY CONSULT SVCS:PALA RD:97-15 210-165-631-5802 1,161.39 1,161.39 56533 07/01/99 003241 MILLAR HEATING & AIR IN HVAC REPAIR:KITCHEN:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 48.20 56533 07/01/99 003241 MILLAR HEATING & AIR IN HVAC REPAIR:FINANCE:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 48.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56533 07/01/99 003241 MILLAR HEATING & AIR IN HVAC REPAIR:MAINTENANCE FAC. 340-199-702-5250 145.00 241.40 56534 07/01/99 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING STREET MAINTENANCE:OLD TOWN 001-164-601-5402 4,800.00 4,800.00 56535 07/01/99 001007 N P G CORPORATION ASPHALT PAVING/STRIPING:H~/Y 79 001-164-601-5402 4,999.00 4,999.00 56536 07/01/99 003707 NATIONAL ASSN OF PURCHA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:M,VOLLMUTH 001-140-999-5226 140.00 140.00 56537 07/01/99 000930 NATIONAL EMBLEM INC UNIFORM PATCHES FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5243 1,144.78 56537 07/01/99 000930 NATIONAL EMBLEM INC SALES TAX 001-170-999-5243 90.48 1,235,26 56538 07/01/99 NEHF, TERESA REFUND:ART/CRAFTS/WHATS CODKIN 190-183-4980 12.00 12.00 56539 07/01/99 002292 OASIS VENDING 56539 07/01/99 002292 OASIS VENDING KITCHEN SUPPLY SVCS:C.H./M.F. 340-199-701-5250 261.65 KITCHEN SUPPLY SVCS:C.H./M.F. 340-199-702-5250 87.21 348.86 56540 07/01/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 15.95 56540 07/01/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 143.72 159.67 56541 07/01/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES INC TEAM BUILDING WRKSHP:12/15/98 001-161-999-5261 1,003.66 1o003.66 56542 07/01/99 PENNINGTON, DEBORA REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 190-183-4984 85.00 85.00 56543 07/01/99 000247 PESTMASTER SPRAYING OF TREES:CALLE ARAGON 001-164-601-5402 595.00 56543 07/01/99 000247 PESTMASTER R-O-W ~EED SPRAYING:CITYWIDE 001-164-601-5402 1,905.00 2,500.00 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5261 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001'150'999-5265 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001'110'999-5260 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5277 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999'5277 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5263 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5250 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 280-199-999-5220 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-184-999-5301 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5258 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-182-999-5301 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 280-199-999-5220 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5260 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5242 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5261 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5265 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-1990 56544 07/01/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-1990 72.73 17.41 19.50 29.05 18.35 8.58 20.00 33.82 10.80 23.46 22.84 50.00 18.78 19.64 7.50 14.00 8.34 7.18 6.44 11.97 41.01 34.98 3.10 499.48 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE CONPAN ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:TCSD 190-180-999-5228 256.90 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:FINANCE 001-140-999-5228 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:98-14-1 001-120-999-5256 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA99-0154 001-161-999-5256 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOT1CE:PA99-0195 001-161-999-5256 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:NO. 57 001-120-999-5256 56545 07/01/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA94-O075 001-161-999-5256 128.45 8.50 20.00 18.75 20.25 17.75 470.60 56546 07/01/99 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC MAY:SC-5002330-8:CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 27.20 27.20 56547 07/01/99 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES REPLACE.PARTS FOR EQUIP:CRC 190-182-999-5212 56547 07/01/99 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES ADD'L REPLACE.PARTS:CRC 190-182-999-5212 56547 07/01/99 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 276.00 196.00 36.58 508.58 56548 07/01/99 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB BACKFLOW TESTING:MARG. RD. 193-180-999-5212 30.00 30.00 56549 07/01/99 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A BUSINESS PARK ASSOC.DUES:DIAZ 001-164-604-5226 56549 07/01/99 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A BUS. PARK ASSOC.DUES:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5226 56550 07/01/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:O1-99-O2003-O:FLOATING MTR 001-164-601-5250 56550 07/01/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:O2-79-10100-1:NW SPORTS PK 190-1270 1,263.63 919.00 213.80 282.48 2,182.63 496.28 56551 07/01/99 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE R-O-W SPRAYING:CITYWIDE 001-164-601-5402 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGS PMT#3:WINCH/YNEZ:9706 210-165-683-5804 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIOE CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT#3:WINCH/YNEZ:9706 210-2035 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIOE CONSTRUCTION PRGS PMT#3:MARG/OVRLND:97-07 210-165-681-5804 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGSS:MARG/OVRLND:C/O 210-165-681-5804 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT#3:MARG/OVRLND:9707 210-2035 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CREDIT:INCORRECT % COMPLETE 210-165-683-5804 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION REVERSE RETENTION ON CREDIT 210-2035 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CREDIT:% COMPLETION IN EXCESS 210-165-681-5804 56552 07/01/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION REVERSE RETENTION FOR CREDIT 210-2035 56553 07/01/99 000958 ROBERT CARAN PRODUCTION PROF.SVCS:FIREUORKS DISPLAY 190-183-999-5370 56554 07/01/99 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. RB:TRANSPORTATION CF:6/2-6/99 001-100-999-5258 2,200.00 403,478.43 40,347.84' 498,815.12 18,319.04 51,713.42- 82,243.54' 8,224.35 26,450.00- 2,645.00 4,000.00 58.75 2,200.00 730,727.14 4,000.00 58.75 56555 07/01/99 SAATZER, KRISTIN REFUND: FIELD RENTAL 190-183-4988 30.00 30.00 56556 07/01/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 56557 07/01/99 002191 SAN DIEGAN ADVERTISING:MRKT PROGRAM 001-111-999-5270 56558 07/01/99 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUITMENT AD:ACCOUNTANT 001-150-999-5254 1,406.13 4,704.00 419.74 1,406.13 4,704.00 419.74 56559 07/01/99 003492 SCHOLASTIC SPORTS ADVERTISING SPONSORSHIP:TVHS 001-100-999-5250 220.00 220.00 56560 07/01/99 003500 SIMON & SIMON CONSTRUCT RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:S.BULA 165-199-813-5804 175.00 175.00 56561 07/01/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC EMPLOYEE PICNIC SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5265 147.58 56561 07/01/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5265 68.33 215.91 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/01/99 11:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUHBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CAL1F EDISON JUN:2-11-OO7-O455:GTH ST 001-164-603-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-14-ZO4-1615:FRONT ST RDO 340-199-701-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-19-184-1824:R.C. TCl 191-180-999-5319 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-19-525-2143:RNBW CYN TCl 191-180-999-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-937-3152:MORENO RD 190-185-999-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-19-111-4834:BEDFORD TCl 191-180-999-5319 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-O2-351-4946:SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-OO-397-5042:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-O49-6416:FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-555-7006:MORENO RD TC 191-180-999-5319 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-799-7911:MORENO RD TC 191-180-999-5319 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-O2-502-8077:MAINT. FAC. 340-1990 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-19-171-8568:WED,CHAPEL 190-185-999-5240 56562 07/01/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:64-77-350-1600-91:MCCABE 190-180-999-5240 317.16 18.79 159.19 121.28 123.05 92.60 1,013,80 5,070.00 808.54 12.53 173,31 109.87 53.57 752.58 42.55 2,719.36 11,588.18 56563 07/01/99 000926 SO CALIF EDISON INSTALL ELECT,SVCS:FRONT ST, 001-164-602-5405 29.14 29.14 56564 07/01/99 002361 SO CALIF FPOS HAZ.OCCUPANCIES SEN:7/21/99 001-171-999-5261 120.00 120.00 56565 07/01/99 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES:CABOOSE 001-1990 58.00 58.00 56566 07/01/99 002799 STEVE KRABBE CUSTOH PAl RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:COBB 165-199-813-5804 1,000.00 1,000.00 56567 07/01/99 SUNRIDGE COHMUNITY CHUR REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 56568 07/01/99 000574 SUPERTONER LASER PRINTER MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5215 90.48 90.48 56569 07/01/99 000305 TARGET STORE HISC. DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 250.67 56569 07/01/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC, RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 37.31 56569 07/01/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-2910 89.58 377.56 56570 07/01/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC INKJET PRINTER FOR FIRE STN 12 001-171-999-5242 425.00 56570 07/01/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC FREIGHT 001-171-999-5242 15.00 56570 07/01/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC SALES TAX 001-171-999-5242 32.94 56570 07/01/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC KXP3626 PANASONIC PRINTER 320-199-999-5242 938.00 56570 07/01/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 35.00 56570 07/01/99 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 72.70 1,518.64 56571 07/01/99 003744 TEMECULA VALLEY AMERICA FY 98-99 CSF AWARD PROGRAM 001-101-999-5267 2,000.00 2,000.00 56572 07/01/99 002111 TOGOS RESTAURANT REFRESHMENTS:CITY EMPL.PICNIC 001-150-999-5265 530.65 530.65 56573 07/01/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON INSTALL BUMPER POSTS:FRONT ST 001-164-603-5319 2,836.00 56573 07/01/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPHENT & CON REMOVE/REPLACE SEATS:OLD TOteM 001-164-603-5319 5,062.50 56573 07/01/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON ADDITIONAL WORK FOR OLD TOWN 001-164-601-5402 108.25 56573 07/01/99 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON CREDIT:EXCEEDS CONTRACT AMT 001-164-603-5319 62.50- 7,944.25 56574 07/01/99 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 384.52 56574 07/01/99 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-VAR.PARKS 190-180-999-5212 337.13 VOUCHRE2 07/01/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56574 56574 56574 56575 56575 56576 56577 56577 56577 56577 56577 56577 56577 56577 11:32 CHECK DATE 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 07/01/99 VENDOR NUMBER 001342 001342 001342 002109 002109 000570 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 VENDOR NAME WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WIMBERLY, VALERIE XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - SR CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC ROLO TAPE FOR TRAFFIC SALES TAX REINB:CONM.WORKSHOP:6/15/99 MAY BASE COPIER CHRG:FIERY 200 APR COPIER LEASE:5365 APR POOLED MAINTENANCE APR INTEREST ON COPIER LEASE MAY COPIER LEASE:5365 MAY POOLED MAINTENANCE MAY POOL MAINTENANCE:TCC MAY INTEREST ON LEASE:5365 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-181-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 001-170-999-5242 001-170-999-5242 001-161-999-5260 330-199-999-5239 330-2800 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5391 330-2800 330-199-999-5217 190-184-999-5239 330-199-999-5391 iTEM AMOUNT 258.06 54.96 197.22 339.00 26.28 103.82 110.00 1,563.54 4,773.29 667.10 1#574.62 4,773.29 361.62 656.02 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 1,231.89 365.28 103.82 14,479.48 TOTAL CHECKS 912,755.85 VOUCHRE2 06/24/~ 12:15 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IHPROVENENT PROJ FUND ANOUNT 375,700.75 2,452.72 866.67 2,812.41 20,104.01 TOTAL 401,936.56. VOUCHRE2 06/26/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56461 56462 56462 56463 56466 56464 56466 56465 56467 56467 56467 56467 56467 56467 56467 56467 56~67 56467 56~67 12:15 CHECK DATE 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 VENDOR NUMBER 003071 000164 000164 001056 000230 000230 000230 002406 000606 000606 000/,06 000606 000406 000406 000606 000406 000406 000406 000406 VENDOR NAME BIDAMERICA ESGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION EXCEL LANDSCAPE M B I A NUNIFINANCIAL M B I A MUNIFINANCIAL M B I A NUNIFINANCIAL PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER] RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS [TEN DESCRIPTION ELECTRONIC ARCHIVING SRVCS PLAN CHECK REVIEW PLAN CHECK SVC IRRIGATION SYS:TEM VLLY MUSEUM PRINT COST/TCSD PUB HEAR NOTIC PRINT COST/TCSD PUB HEAR NOTIC PRINT COST/TCSD PUB HEAR NOTIC FURN]TURE/C,H, MODIFICATIONS LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR ~99 LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR LAW ENFORCEMENT ' APR LAW ENFORCEMENT ' APR ~99 LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR '99 LAW ENFORCEMENT ' APR ~99 LAW ENFORCEMENT - APR '99 LAW ENFORCEMENT ' APR '99 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 210-190-808-5806 192-180-999-5256 193-180-999-5256 194-180-999-5256 210-199-808-5804 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5289 001-170-999-5291 001-1230 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5279 001-170-999-5297 ITEM AMOUNT 9,777.30 4,021.38 7,489.67 12,889.00 2,452.72 866.67 2,812.61 7,215,01 197,462.16 38,866.00 19,251.20 9,724.00 9,625.60 6,358.56 6,358.56 29,782.66 19,748,17 6,165,09 11,090.40 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 9,777.30 11,511.05 12,889.00 6,131.80 7,215.01 354,412.40 TOTAL CHECKS 601,936.56 VOUCHRE2 07/01/99 lz:52 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS AMOUNT 422,951.70 1,115,729.64 521,805.13 12,897.68 6,985.26 TOTAL 2,080,369.41 VOUCHRE2 07/01/99 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 56580 56580 56580 56580 56581 56581 56582 56583 56584 56585 56585 56585 56585 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56586 56587 56587 56587 56587 56587 56587 56588 56589 56589 56589 56590 56591 56592 14:52 CHECK DATE 07/13/99 07/1]/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/1]/99 07/1]/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 07/13/99 VENDOR NUMBER 003567 003567 00]567 00]567 002634 002634 002256 002406 002993 003704 003704 00]704 00]704 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 002181 002181 002181 002181 002181 002181 003282 003479 003479 003479 00]599 001035 003545 VENDOR NAME C C MYERS INC C C MYERS INC C C MYERS INC C C MYERS INC LITELINES INC LITELINES INC P & D CONSULTANTS INC PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QU PRESENTATION SYSTEMS IN PRESENTATION SYSTEMS IN PRESENTATION SYSTEMS IN PRESENTATION SYSTEMS IN RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE C0 SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION- S PARKER ENGINEERING IN S PARKER ENGINEERING IN S PARKER ENGINEERING IN T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL THINK JACOBSON & ROTH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION JUN PRGSS:OVRLD OVRCRSS/I-15 RETENTION W/H FOR JUN PRGSS JUN PRGSS:OVRLD OVRCRSS/I-15 CREDIT:REVISION PER CONTRACTOR ASSEMBLY FOR HANGING BANNERS SALES TAX MAY:TEMP,INSPECTOR SERVICES OFFICE FURNITURE FOR PW MAY DESIGN SVCS:WINCH/Pb98-07 JVC 3CCD CAMERA T14 X 55RLI LENS FREIGHT SALES TAX APR BOOKING FEES 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/08-5/05/99 LAb ENFORCEMENT MAY PRGS PMT#6:bINCH.RD/97-03 C/O PRGS PMT#6:bINCH.RD./97-03 C/0#4 PRGS PMT:bINCH.RD,:97-O] RET.b/H PMT#6:bINCH.RD.:97-O] MAY PRGSS PMT#17:RC/I15:95-12 RET.W/H PMT#17:RC/I-15:95-12 RETENTION TO ESCROW ACCT JUN PRGS PMT#]:blNCH.MEDIANS JUN PRGS PMT#3:bINCH.MEDIANS RET.b/H PMT#3:bINCH.MEDIANS MAY PROF.ENG.SVCS:OVRLND:95-11 JAN-JUN TRASH HAULING SVCS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:TEM.MUSEUM ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-165-604-5804 210-2035 210-165-604-5804 210-165-604-5804 280-199-999-5271 280-199-999-5271 001-162-999-5118 001-165-999-5601 210-165-697-5802 320-1950 ]20-1950 320-1950 320-1950 001-170-999-5273 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5289 001-170-999-5291 001-1230 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5279 001-170-999-5297 210-165-697-5804 210-165-697-5804 210-165-697-5804 210-2035 210-165-601-5804 210-2035 210-1035 210-165-673-5804 210-165-686-5804 210-2035 210-165-604-5801 194-1990 210-190-808-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 47,742.05 39,862.97- 350,887.60 10,712.00- 11,970.00 927.68 12,216.00 7,284.89 20,864.72 4,125.00 2,330.00 ]0.00 500.26 8,169.60 196,672.98 39,262.40 58,368.00 9,835.40 9,728.00 9,217.60 9,217.60 27,042.43 20,210.36 8,259.24 7,467.20 913.02 2,805.92 19,194.18 1,145.66- 7,405.49 370.27- 370.27 11,823.87 34,327.01 4,615.10- 10,712.00 1,115,729.64 71,465.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 348,054.68 12,897.68 12,216.00 7,284.89 20,864.72 6,985.26 403,450.81 28,802.68 370.27 41,535.78 10,712.00 1,115,729.64 71,465.00 TOTAL CHECKS 2,080,369.41 ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 13, 1999 City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1999 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: as of May 31, 1999. That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of May 31, 1999. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1999 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of May 31, 1999 3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of May 31, 1999 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of May 31, 1999 Cash Activity forthe Month of May Cash end Investments as of May 1, 1999 Cash Reenipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of May 31, 1999 $ 54,61~543 8,002,187 (4,478,512) $ 58,141,218 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Maturity/ Tormiaatioa Type of Investment Institution Yield Dat~ Petty Cash City Hall n/a $ General Checking Union Bank rda Sweep Acecant Union Bank 3.880 % (Money Market Account) Cdighmark U.S. Treasury) Benefit Demand Deposits Union Bank n/a Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 5.086 % Certificate of Deposit CommtmityBank 4.350 % (Reteation Escrow) Savings Account California Bank Tntst 4.400 % CRct~ntion Escrow) Savings Account Union Bank 4.630 % (Rctention Escrow) Savings A~count U.S. Bank (First An~ Treasury) 4.209 % (ReWation Escrow) Checking Account Union Bank n/a (Parking Citutioas) Trust Accounts- Measure A U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.209 % (Money Market Account) Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.209 % (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Cotp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 (Investment Agreement) Delinq. Main. Reserve Aocotmt - CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.422 % 9/1/2017 (Investment Agrement) Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 U.S. Bank (First An~ Treasury) 4.209 % (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 State Treasurer 5.086 % (Local Agency Investment Fund) Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs U.S. Bank (First Am~ Treasury) 4.209 % (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Bayerlsehe Lendesbank 6.870 % 10/1/2012 (Investment Agreement) Trust Aceounts-RDABonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.209 % (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Baygrische Lendesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 (Investment Agreement) ContraotuaF Market Par/Book Value Balenee 1,500 $ 1,500 (1,923,720) (1,923,720) (1) 116,204 116,204 5,179 5,179 (1) 50,129,041 50,12~041 (2) 482,394 482,394 151,872 151,872 222,375 222,375 28,403 28,403 1,940 1,940 150 150 3,151,246 3,151,246 1,531,469 1,531,469 500,000 500,000 52,828 52,828 941,531 941,531 17,508 17,508 502,690 502,690 779,688 779,688 1,448,920 1,448,920 $ 58,141,218 (1)-This mount is net of outstaading checks. (2)-At May 31, 1999 total market value (including accrued int=rast) for the Local Abbey Investment Fund (LAW) was $37,445,748,162. The City's proportionate share of that value is $50,404,350. All investxnents are liquid end currently available. TheCityofTemecula'sportfolioisinoompliencewiththeinvastmentpolicy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months. City of Temecula Schedule of Asseta, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of May31, 1999 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due ]~om other funds Land held for resale Prepaid assets D~posits Fixed assets-net Totalassets city (1) Community Services District $ 36,093,411 $ 3,481,628 ~101,173 5,071 251,786 9,248 530,401 124,363 506,850 5,300 960,674 $ 42,568,658 $ 3,501,247 Redevelopment Ag;ney $ 10,856,935 1,575,292 2,103,053 $ 14,535,280 Community Facilities Districts (2) Total 7,709,244 $ 58,141,218 5,681,536 261,034 2,633,454 124,363 1,124,300 1,636,450 960,674 $ 8,833,544 $ 69.438.729 Liabilities and fund ,xluity: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other liabilities Total liabilities $ 171,199 $ 9,248 9,095,169 141,016 9,266,368 150,264 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,281,781 Retained earnings 998,542 Fund balances: Reserved (3) 18,581,691 Designated (3) 8,652,745 Undesignated 3,787,53 1 Totalfund equity 33,302,290 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 42.568.658 $ 695.946 2.655.037 3,350,983 3,501,247 929,992 929,992 9.793.171 3.812,117 13.605.288 14.535.280 $ 80,587 $ 261,034 4,460,351 1{626,528 4.540.938 1,124,300 3,168,306 4,292.606 $ 8,833,544 14.887.562 1.281.781 998.542 30,195,108 18,288,205 3,78~531 54.551.167 $ 69.438.729 (1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and other special revenue funds. (2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills). (3) Reservations and designations of fund balance are detailed on the following pages. ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 13, 1999 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. DISCUSSION: The California legislature has passed legislation imposing a State-mandated local program requiring the treasurer or chief fiscal officer to render an annual statement of investment policy to the legislative body of the local agency and to render a quarterly report containing specified information regarding investments and deposits to the chief executive officer and the legislative body of the local agency. The Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy, as presented herein, is in conformity with the State requirements and guidelines established by the California Municipal Treasurer's Association, the California Society of Municipal Treasurer's Association, and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. The City of Temecula currently invests primarily in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). This investment is consistent with the City's Investment Policy which prioritizes safety and liquidity over yield. It should be noted that LAIF is prohibited by state code from investing in certain derivative products such as inverse floaters. LAIF investment policy also puts constraints on the use of reverse repurchase agreements. Government Code Section 16429.3 states that "money placed with the State Treasurer for deposit in LAIF by cities, counties, or special districts shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any state official or state agency". The attached investment policy reflects no changes from the previous policy adopted by the City Council on July 14, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS Proposed Investment Policy R.'WORTONL~AGENDASVNVESTMENTPLCYAGNDOC 0712/98 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY INTRODUCTION The investment policies and practices of the City of Temecula are based upon State law and prudent money management. The primary goals of these policies are: 1. To protect the principal monies entrusted to this office; 2. To provide sufficient liquidity to meet normal operating and unexpected expenditures; To assure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local laws governing the investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer; and To generate a maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of prudent risk management and consistent with the above policies. The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer (referred to as the "Fund" throughout the remainder of this document) will be invested, administered, and reported in a timely and prudent manner. The City Treasurer and staff will observe, review, and react to changing conditions that effect the fund. The authority to execute investment transactions that will effect the Fund will be limited to: City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant to the City Manager or City Clerk and · Director of Finance acting together The Director of Finance will meet on a regular basis with the City Manager to discuss current market conditions, future trends, and to plan investment strategy to meet the City's fiscal objectives. The policy stated below will also address risk management because it is such an integral part of the investment policy. To concentrate only on maximizing return would be dangerous; therefore, policy issues will be directed to: 1. Limiting the Fund's exposure to each issue and issuer of debt; and Determining a minimum credit requirement that firms must have in order to hold City money. R:|NORTONLIAGENDASIINVSTPL C. AGN 1 7/7/99 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY I SCOPE In accordance with Ordinance No. 90-2 of the City Council of the City of Temecula and as prescribed by Section 41000 through 41007 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury. II OBJECTIVES A. Safety of Principal Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Temecula. Each investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing only with issuers whose financial strength and reputation can be verified to be the highest as rated by nationally known rating agencies (see Section VI for detailed limitations on credit risk), and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash flow. Market Risk. Market risk, the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by (a) structuring the portfolio so that securities mature earlier than or concurrent with the timing of major cash outflows, thus eliminating the need to sell securities prior to their maturity; (b) prohibiting the use of leverage and margin accounts; and 8 prohibiting the taking of short positions - that is, selling securities which the City does not own. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall investment return. B. Return on Investment The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Whenever possible, and consistent with risk limitations, as defined herein, and prudent investment principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average rate of return. III SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment R:INORTONL IAGENDASIINVSTPL C. AGN 2 7/6/99 IV V VI CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY procedures (i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security after the security has been properly delivered). This section is intended to comply with Government Code 53635. REPORTING The City Treasurer shall render a monthly report to the City Manager and City Council showing the type of investment, issuing institution, selling institution, date of maturity, par and dollar amount of deposit, current market value for all securities, return on the City's investment portfolio expressed as an annual percentage rate, yield to maturity, cash flow information demonstrating that the City can meet its upcoming financial obligations, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The report shall also state its relationship to this statement of investment policy, as directed under the Code. The treasurer shall annually submit a recommended updated Investment Policy to be reviewed and approved by City Council. The City=s investment reporting policy meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 53646 of the California Government Code. QUALIFIED DEALERS The City shall transact investments only with banks, savings and loans, investment security dealers and the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. The dealers must be primary dealers regularly reporting to the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Exceptions to this rule will be made only after thorough research and documented confirmation of financial strength and reputation and after approval by the City Council. Investment staff shall investigate dealers who wish to do business with the City in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City's needs, and are recommended by managers of portfolios like the City's. The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered as evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment policies, and intends to show the City only appropriate investments. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor" rule, which states: "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: R:tNORTONL'IAGENDASIINVSTPLC, AGN 3 7/6/99 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY United States Treasury Bills. Bonds. and Notes. or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for PaYment Of principal and interest. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be invested in this category. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. Obligations issued bv the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). the Federal Farm Credit Bank Svstem (FFCB). the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB), and the Federal National Mortqage Association (FNMA). Although there is no percentage limitation on the dollar amount that can be invested in these issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. Bills of exchanee or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank, otherwise known as banker's acceptances. Banker's acceptances purchased may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances issued by any one bank. Commercial paper ranked "P1" by Moody's Investor Services and "A1 +" by Standard and Poor's. and issued bv a domestic COrPOratiOn havine assets in excess of $500,000,000 and having an "A" or better rating on its long-term debentures as provided by Moodv's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation's commercial paper. Maturity is not to exceed 180 days. Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by nationally or state-chartered bank or a state or federal savinas and loan association. Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) differ from other certificates of deposit by their deposit liquidity. They are issued against funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn specified or variable rates of interest. NCDs are traded actively in secondary markets. When feasible, an independent trading service will be used as part of the evaluation process. Issuers must be rated AB- or better by Thomson Bank Watch or equivalent rating service, or rated A-1 for deposits by Standard & Poor=s, or P-1 for deposits by Moody=s or comparably rated by a national rating agency. Transactions in NCDs shall not collectively exceed 30% of the total portfolio in effect immediately after any such investment is made. Repurchase Aareements. The City may invest in repurchase agreements with banks and dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase agreement which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements. 1. Transactions shall be limited to the primary dealers and the top banking institutions according to the rating agency based on liquidity, profitability, and financial strength. The maturity of repurchase agreements shall not exceed 30 days. The market value of securities used as collateral for R: INORTONL tAGENDA SIINVSTPL C. AGN 4 7/6/99 CITY OF TEM ECULA INVESTMENT P~LICY repurchase agreements shall be monitored daily by the investment staff and will not be allowed to fall below 102% of the value of the repurchase agreement plus the value of collateral in excess of the value of the repurchase agreement (haircut). In order to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provide for the liquidation of securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, the only securities acceptable as collateral shall be certificates of deposit, eligible bankers' acceptances, or securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency of the United States. No more than 50% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements, and a "perfected security interest" shall always be maintained in the securities subject to a repurchase agreement. Local Agency Investment Fund. The City may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by State law. Time Deoosits. The City may invest in non-negotiable time deposits collateralized in accordance with the California Government Code (attached), in those banks and savings and loan associations which meet the requirements for investment in negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in this category. The issuer firm should have been in existence for at least five years. The City may waive the first 100,000 of collateral security for such deposits if the institution is insured pursuant to federal law. In order to security the uninsured portions of such deposits, an institution shall maintain at least 10% in excess of the total amount deposited. Real estate mortgages may not be accepted as collateral. The maximum term for deposits shall be one year. In general, the issuer must have a minimum 6% net worth to assets ratio or the minimum ratio established by the Comptroller of the Currency. The issuer's operation must have been profitable during their last reporting period. Money Market Funds. The City may invest in money market funds which invest solely in U.S. Treasuries, obligations of the U.S. Treasury, and repurchase agreements relating to such treasury obligations. To be eligible, companies selling money market funds must have an investment advisor with not less than five years experience and that is registered with the SEC, has the highest ranking available as evaluated by a nationally recognized rating service, and with assets in excess of $500 million. Ineliqible Investments. Investments not described herein, including, but not limited to, reverse repurchase agreements, mutual funds, zero coupon bonds, inverse floaters, mortgage backed securities, common stocks and corporate notes and bonds are prohibited from use in this portfolio. R: INOR TONL IA GENDA S|IN VS TPL C. A GN 5 7/6/99 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY This list of authorized investments is intended to apply to the investment of all operating and surplus funds. The investment of bond proceeds shall be governed by the permitted investments as specified in the official statement for each bond issue. VII SWAPPING OF SECURITIES A swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done for a variety of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit, or to increase investment quality. The purchase transaction and the sale transaction must each be recorded separately and any losses or gains on the sale must be recorded. VIII PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS Should an investment percentage-of-portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his or her decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. IX POLICY REVIEW This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. The City Council shall be responsible for maintaining guidance over this investment policy to ensure that the City can adapt readily to changing market conditions, and shall approve any modification to the investment policy prior to implementation. STA TE LA W The legislated authority of the Fund is covered in Sections 53601, 53635 and 53646 of the Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine the maximum parameters of the Fund. It is the policy of the City Treasurer to comply with the State laws governing the Fund. R:tNORTONL tAGENDASIINVSTPL C. AGN 6 7/6/99 ITEM 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 13, 1999 1998-99 Community Service Funding Program Special Distribution PREPARED BY: Linda Norton, Administrative Secretary RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and approve the 1998-99 Community Service Funding Program application request from the Education Foundation in the amount of $12,000 to fund the Chaparral High School stadium lighting. DISCUSSION: At the City Council meeting of June 22,1999 Councilmember Jeff Stone requested that staff bring forward a funding request from the Chaparral High School Education Foundation for a 1998-99 Community Service Funding grant award for the Chaparral High School stadium lighting project. The Education Foundation was founded to serve as an umbrella organization for parent support groups on campus. The Stadium Drive is one of these support groups formed specifically to raise funds to complete the outdoor stadium at Chararral High School. The project will include lights, seating, press box, concession stand and an all-weather track. The foundation is requesting a grant of $12,000 from the City to reach their funding goal. The Stadium Drive's goal was to raise $100,000; and is receiving $88,000 in donations from their fundraising efforts. The Foundation is a non-profit organization that meets the City's Community Service Funding Program award criteria. However, the City Council would be making an exception to the program's maximum grant award of $5,000 currently allowed to fund this request. FISCAL IMPACT: A balance of $26,820 is available for Council recommendation from account number 001-101-999-5267. Attachment: Education Foundation Application R: ~NORTONL IA GENDA SI9899Spec/alCSFAgn. doc 07/08/99 CITY OF TEMECULA CITY OF TEMEC~ 1998-99 JUN 3 0 1999 COMMUNITY SERVICES FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION (Please Print or Type) FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1998-99 Program Submission Deadline: Friday, September 25, 1998 (7 copies required) Amount Requested: $ Name of Project: Project Start Date: ORGANIZATION'S DATA: Name of Organization: Contact Name: 12,000.00 ~h~p=r~a~ ~gh Jan, ~999 ChaDarral Hiqh StadiUm Shari Cra]l frnm R~n~hn Mailing Address: 27215 Nicolas Road, Telephone: (909) 695-4200 x158 Number of Paid Staff: '0- Geographic Area(s) Served: ~Chr~Q~ ~du~ation Project End Date: (Maximum allowable $5,000) Foundation Stadium Drivc ,7. n~ 1999 School Education Foundation Drive Temecula, CA 92591 YearFounded: 1999 NumberofVolunteers: 18 ~lifnrni~ ~n~ nnrth Is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization? Yes x No Effective Date: 24 Scpt 1998 If "yes": Date of incorporation as a non-profit 24 Scpt 1998 Federal identification number ~3-0R00705 State identification number *Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California. If "no": Name of sponsoring organization Federal identification number State identification number This application has been authorized by the organization's: Executive Committee Board of Directors Members-at-large R: INOR TONL I CSI~9899APP. FRM 05/! 3/98 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Based on your organization's last fiscal year) Balance Sheet as of Asset Cash and Investments $ Receivables (detail) liabilities & Investments Current payables Notes Payable Application Page 2 Inventory Fixed Assets Other Assets Total Assets Fund Balance Total Liability & Fund Balance Income Statement for the Year Ended Income Fundraising $ Fy, i;)enses Salaries Foundation grants $ Operating expenses United Way $ Community services Government Funds $ Amount sent to national/parent organization Other sources $ Other expenses $ Please note with an asterisk (*) any amounts that require additional explanation, and comment on these items. In addition, please attach the organization's most recent treasurer's report, financial statements and footnotes. (It does not require a CPA's audit, but please submit if available.) R: INOR TONL I CS~9899APP. FRM 05/13/98 THE ORGANIZATION MISSION STATEMENT Application Page 3 ~ describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it provides. Include discussion on the specific ways your organization meets the City's criteria listed on page 2. The Chaparral High School Education Foundation was founded to serve as an umbrella organization for parent support groups on campus. It provides a basic structure under which parent support groups may operate with a centralized financial management structure using a professional ~utside accounting firm. The Stadium Drive is one of these parent support groups formed s~ec~f~ca]ly to raise funds to complete the outdoor stadium at ChaDarral High School, including lights, seating, press box/concession stand, and all-weather track. R: INOR TONL ~ CSr"19899A PP. FRM 05/~' 3/98 PROJECT REQUESTING FUNDING Application Page 4 How will your organization use any funding awarded? Provide project objectives, persons served, area serviced, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Include equipment or services that would be purchased and why. Include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities related to this project. You may attach a mAxim,,m of one double-spaced typewritten page of information. (Please type or print legibly.) City of Temecula grant funding will be used toward purchase of stadium lighting ennabling athletic practices and games, marching band practices and other community events to be held at CHS after dark. Eventua~ completion of the stadium will also allow for graduations and assembly facilities. This project will benefit every Chaparral High School student, current or future, which at this point is half of the children in Temecula. N-mbGr ef vQlun~eer~ ~ ~mpQs~ble ~e a~e~n_ Our cemm~ee i~ formed by 18 consistent volunteers but CHS ASR, football soccer, baseball, track, band boosters have sponsored fundraisers. R: IN OR TONL I CS,R 9899,4 PP. FRM 05/~ 3/98 SIGNATURE PAGE Application Page 5 We hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Preparer: Shari S. Crall - stadium drive co-chair NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type) AND President or Authorized Officer: NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type) (Signature) Chaparral High School Education Foundation Stadium Drive (Organization Name) 27215 (909) (909) (Telephone) 695-4200 x158 676-9136 C~ 99591 (Mailing Address of Organization) 6/28/1999 (Date) SURE TO INCLUDI: THF ORInlNAI PLUS 6 COPIFS {TOTAL OF 7 COPIES) AND SUBMIT TO: Mail Completed Application to: City of Temecula Community Services Funding Program Linda Norton P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Or Deliver in Person to: City of Temecula Linda Norton 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 R: tNOR TONL | CSFI9899A PP. FRM 0.5/13/98 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR P. O. BOX 2508 CINCINNATI, OH 45201 Date: SEP 4 1996 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION C/O CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL 27215 NICOLAS RD TEMECULA, CA 92591-7324 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Employer Identification Number: 33-0800705 DLN: 17053169016008 Contact Person: D. A. DOWNING Contact Telephone Number: (513) 241-5199 Accounting Period Ending: June 30 Foundation Status Classification: 50~(a) (2) 'Advance Ruling Period Begins: May 15, 1998 Advance Ruling Period Ends: June 30, 2002 Addendum Applies: No Dear Applicant: Based on information you supplied, and assuming your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition of exemption, we have determined you are exempt from federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). Because you are a newly created organization, we are not now making a final determination of your foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code. However, we have determined that you can reasonably expect to be a publicly supported organization described in section 509(a)(2). Accordingly, during an advance ruling period you will be treated as a publicly supported organization, and not as a private foundation. This advance ruling period begins and ends on the dates shown above. Within 90 days after the end of your advance ruling period, you must send us the information needed to determine whether you have met the require- ments of the applicable support test during the advance ruling period. If you establish that you have been a publicly supported organization, we will classi- fy you as a section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) organization as long as you continue to meet the requirements of the applicable support test. If you do not meet the public support requirements during the advance ruling period, we will classify you as a private foundation for future periods. Also, if we classify you as a private foundation, we will treat you as a private foundation from .your beginning date for purposes of section 507(d) and 4940. Grantors and contributors may rely on our determination that you are not a private foundation until 90 days after the end of your advance ruling period. If you send us the required information within the 90 days, grantors and contributors may continue to rely on the advance determination until we make a final determination of your foundation status. Letter 1045 (DO/CG) 0~13~9 Chaparrai High School Education Foundation Statement of Position As of April 30, 1999 Apr 30, ASSETS Current Assets Checking/Savings Temecula Valley Bank 39,803.67 Checking - Scrip 3,602.82 Total Checking/Savings 43,406.49 Other Current Assets Advance 850.00 Total Other Current Assets 850.00 Total Current Assets 44,256.49 Other Assets Deposit 500.00 Total Other Assets 500.00 TOTAL ASSETS 44,756.49 LIABILITIES & EQUITY Equity Net Income 43,332.77 Net Assets Scrip fund 520.73 Parent football 902.99 Total Net Assets 1,423.72 Total Equity 44,756.49 TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 44,756.49 Page 1 0 00,-" ~.. o0 0O U 00 _ 0 DATE 6/7199 6/7199 6/7/99 611 6/99 6/16/99 6/16/99 6/16/99 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL STADIUM COMMITTEE FUNDRAISING I DONATION ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION BeuinninQ Balance Deposit (Robinsons/May) Deposit (donations) Deposit (Califomia Speedway) Deposit (Robinsons/May) Deposit (donations) Deposit (snack bar CIF baseball) Endinci Balance CREDITS $36,660.48 $10.00 $21,550.00 $1,768.72 $5.00 $1,300.00 $118.00 $61,676.78 DEBITS ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Peter Thorson, City Attorney July 13, 1999 Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. DISCUSSION: On October 7, 1997, the City of Temecula became the governing entity for Community Facilities District No. 88-12 which was originally established in 1988 by the County of Riverside for improvements on Ynez Road. Bonds were issued by the CFD in 1992 in order to fund the improvements. In June 1998 these bonds were refunded, and new bonds were issed in their place. These bonds are repaid through parcelized special taxes. Such taxes are collected in bi-annual installments and are placed on the County's tax roll rather than being hand-billed. As a result of property owners' failure to pay the special taxes, the properties with the following parcel numbers within CFD No. 88-12 are currently delinquent: 910300013-1; 921730004-2; 921730005-3; 921730006-4; 921730007-5; 921730008-6; 921730009-7; 921730010-7; 921730011-8; 921730012-9; 921730013-0; 921730014-1; 921730015-2; 921730018-5; 944330001-0; 944330017-5;944330003-2;94433000~3;944330005-4;and 944330007-6. R: INOR TONL tAG ENDA S{ CFDForecloseAgnda. doc 07/06/99 As of May 1999, the delinquencies on these parcels exceeded $151,232. As the governing body of CFD 88-12, the City of Temecula is obligated to foreclose upon the delinquent parcels pursuant to its responsibilities under the bond indentures. In order for the City to proceed with its foreclosure action, it must first seek to "strip" the existing delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. In order to achieve this, the City Council must adopt a resolution which strips the delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. Subsequently, the City must file a Notice of Stripping which effectively relieves the County Tax Collector from further responsibility in the collection and/or foreclosure upon the delinquent parcels. The goal of the actions is to obtain payment of the special taxes due along with interest, penalties and costs of collection. Property owners will be given every opportunity to pay the amounts due, but the City must formally proceed with the foreclosure actions. FISCAL IMPACT: The delinquencies on these parcels exceeds $151,232 and will be used to satisfy the debt service requirement on the outstanding bonds. Attachments: Resolution No. 99- Exhibit A to Resolution No. 99- R: WOR TON L tAG END A Sl CFDForecloseAgnda. doc 07/06/99 RESOLUTION NO. 99-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQURIEDC BY LAW; ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare as follows: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and A. The County of Riverside, California, did previously undertake proceedings to and did establish a community facilities distdct pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (hereinafter "Mello-Roos Act"), as codified, Government Code section 53311, et seq.; and B. The County of Riverside did previously issue special tax bonds pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Mello-Roos Act to finance public improvements; and C. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, the timely collection of the special tax installments are necessary for the timely payment of all principal and interest on the special tax bond and each special tax levy thereof and interest and penalties thereon constitute liens against the lots and parcels of land against which they are made, until the same are paid; and D. Certain special taxes have not been paid when due, and certain special taxes may not be paid in the future; and E. The County of Riverside has covenanted with the owners of the special tax bonds to commence and diligently pursue foreclosure actions against those parcels of land subject to the delinquent payment of special taxes; and F. The City of Temecula, as successor-in-interest to the County of Riverside, desires to assume the duty of the County of Riverside Tax Collector in collecting upon the existing delinquencies in Community Facilities District No. 88-12; and G. Under the provisions of Section 8834 of the Califomia Streets and Highways Code, the City Council is authorized, at any time pdor to the expiration of four years subsequent to the last maturity of the principal of bonds secured by assessment or reassessment, to order the same to be collected by an action brought in the Superior Court to foreclose the liens of the delinquent special taxes; and R:INORTONL IAGENDAStCFDForecloseAgnda.doc 07/06/99 H. Under the provisions of Section 8833 of the Califomia Streets and Highways Code, when such foreclosure actions are ordered, the county tax collector is to be credited upon the current tax roll with the amount charged against the tax collector on account of the delinquent special taxes to be sued on and to be relieved of furlher duty in regard thereto and a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll is to be recorded with the county recorders office in the county in which the real property is located. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby orders that the delinquent payments of special taxes for CFD 88-12 with respect to those parcels identified on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and all subsequent delinquent spedal taxes with respect to those parcels which are not paid when due, be collected by action brought in the Superior Court of Riverside to foreclose the liens thereof. Section 3. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute such actions in the name of the City to foreclose the liens of all such delinquent special taxes. Section 4. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and cause to be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll. Section 5. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conduction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Auditor/Controller's office of the County of Riverside together with such other documents and the payment of such fees as is necessary or appropriate to credit the County of Riverside Tax Collector upon the tax roll with the amounts charged against the Tax Collector on account of the delinquent special tax installments to be sued upon and to relieve the Tax Collector of further duty in regards thereto. Section 6. The City Manager, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to take such further actions as may be necessary or convenient to recover the special taxes due from the properties and to prosecute the foreclosure actions. Section 7. The City Clerk shall cedify the adoption of this Resolution. R:INORTONLtAGENDASICFDFo,recloseAgnda. doc 07/06/99 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on July 13, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular th meeting thereof held on the 13 day of July, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R: WOR TONL tAG END A $l Cr"D Foredo seAgnda. doc 07/06/99 City of Temecula Community Facilities Districts EXHIBIT A Assessor's Parcel No. Installment DelinQuent CFD NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) NORTH PLAZA 921-730-004-2 921-730-005-3 921-730-006-4 921-730-007-5 921-730-008-6 921-730-009-7 921-730-010-7 921-730-011-8 921-730-012-9 921-730-013-0 921-730-014-1 921-730-015-2 921-730-018-5 A~dl A~dl A~dl A~dl A~dl A3dl A~ril A }dl A ~dl A ~dl A ~dl A ~dl A ~ril 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 10,1999 PALM PLAZA 910-300-013-1 Apd110,1999 RANCHO CAL HIGHLANDS II 944-330-001-0 December10,1998 Apd110,1999 944-330-003-2 December10,1998 Apd110,1999 944-330-017-5 December10,1998 Apd110,1999 RANCHO CAL HIGHLANDS I 944-330-004-3 December 10, 1998 April 10, 1999 944-330-005-4 December10,1998 April10,1999 944-330-007-6 December10,1998 Apd110,1999 Amount $ 3,188.38 5,539.66 12,605.80 2,252.80 1,218.73 I 132.55 2 068.14 2 043.52 I 391.07 I 526.48 I 575.73 8 568.00 9 294.31 16,397.38 9,282.00 9,282.00 5,182.66 5,182.66 11,460.93 11,460.93 5,773.55 5,773.55 5,613.52 5,613.52 3,902.38 3,902.38 R: WOR TONL |A GEND A St CFD ForecloseAgnda. doc 07/06/99 ITEM 8 APPRQVA-'~ CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City ManagedCity Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Funds for Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City annually through the Economic Development Agency of Riverside County. The CDBG funds may be used for the support of activities that provide decent housing and suitable living environments and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income. This is the standard agreement similar to the one the City entered into in 1997. CDBG regulations require counties to re-qualify as an Urban County under the CDBG program every three years, therefore, the execution of this agreement is necessary to include the City as a participating unit in the County's CDBG program. Participation in the Urban County program makes the City eligible for the same kind of CDBG funding it has received in the previous years. It is estimated that CDBG funding levels administered by the county during this cooperation agreement will be between $300,000 and $400,000 annually. The City's CDBG funding level for fiscal year 1999-00 is $313,701 and is programmed to fund eight (8) public service organizations and one (1) City capital improvement construction project. The most recent census data indicated the City's population remains below 50,000 therefore, at this time it is not feasible to pursue submitting an application for entitlement which would allow the City to receive fudning directly from HUD. This situation has been and will continue to be monitored closely as we have been in discussion with the HUD Pacific Regional Office. Next fiscal year the City will request that HUD prepare funding data based on current population projections in an effort to estimate the feasibility of entitlement status. FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City, other than staff time needed to administer program requirements. Attachment: CDBG Cooperation Agreement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 COUNTY OF RIVERSI DE of the State of Cal iforn ia, herei nafter referred to as "COUNTY", and City of , an incorporated municipality within the geographical boundaries of the COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as. "CITY", mutually agree as follows: WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (Public Law 93~383), hereinafter called "ACT" provides that Community Development Block Grant, hereinafter referred to as "CDBG", funds may be used for the support of activities that provide decent housing and suitable living environments and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income; and WHEREAS, the HOME program authorized by the HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) was enacted as Title II of' the National. Affordable Housing Act of 1990, has as its purposes: to expand the supply of decent, affordable housing for low and very. low income families with emphasis on rental housing; build State and local capacity to carry out affordable housing programs, and provide for coordinated assistance to participants in the development of affordable low-income housing; and WHEREAS, CDBG regulations require counties to re-qualify as an Urban County under' the CDBG program every three years; and WHEREAS, the execution of this Agreement is.necessary to include CITY as a participating unit of general government under COUNTY's Urban County CDBG and HOME program. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree as fol lows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement gives COUNTY authority to undertake or assist in undertaking activities for Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, which will be funded from the CDBG 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 program, the HOME Investment Partnership program, and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. COUNTY and CITY agree to cooperate to undertake or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. COUNTY is qualified as an "Urban County" under the ACT. CITY, by executing this Agreement, hereby gives notice of its election to participate in an Urban County Community Development Block Grant program, hereinafter referred to as "CDBG programs". By executing this Agreement, CITY understands that it may not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State CDBG Programs for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the Urban County's CDBG program and that CITY may participate in a HOME program only through the Urban County not a consortium. 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for not less than .a period of three (3) years commencing on July 1, 2000 and extending through the federal fiscal years 2002-2003, which ends June 30, 2003, unless an earlier date of termination is fixed by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter cal led H U D, pursuant to ACT. The terms of th is Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG (and HOME, where applicable) funds and program income received with respect to activities carried out during the three-year qualification period are expended and the funded activities completed, and that the COUNTY nor the CITY may terminate or withdraw from the cooperation Agreement while it remains in effect. 3. PREPARATION OF FEDERALLY REQUIRED FUNDING APPLICATIONS. COUNTY, by and through its Economic Development Agency, subject to approval of COUNTY's Board of Supervisors, shall be responsible for preparing and submitting to HUD, in a timely manner those reports and statements required by the ACT and the federal regulations promulgated by HUD to secure entitlement grant funding under the CDBG and HOME program. This duty shall include the preparation and processing of COUNTY Housing, Community and Economic Development Needs Identification Report, Citizen Participation Plan, the County Consolidated Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report and other related 2 ; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 programs which satisfy the application requirements of ACT and its regulations- 4. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATUTES. REGULATIONS AND OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES. REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES- (a) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable provisions of the ACT and those federal regulations promulgated by HUD pursuant thereto, as the same currently exists or may hereafter be amended. The COUNTY and CITY will take all actions necessary to assure compliance with COUNTY's certifications required by Section 104 (b) of Title I of ACT. COUNTY and CITY will comply with .the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, and Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations part 570; the Fair Housing Act; Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable housing Act (Public Law 101-625); Section 109 Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.§5309); Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259; Executive Order 11988; the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition I~olicies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.§4630, et.seq.) and other federal or state statute or regulation that is applicable to the use of CDBG or HOME Investment partnerships Act (enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990) funds. (b) CITY agrees that CDBG funding for activities in or in support of CITY are prohibited it CITY does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or impedes COIJNTY actions to comply with its fair housing certification- (c) CITY and COUNTY shall meet the citizen participation requirements of 24 CFR 570.301 and provide citizens with: 1. the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used for activities thai will benefit persons of low and moderate income; and 24 2. aplanforminimizingdisPlacement°fPers°nsasaresult°factivities 25 assisted wi'liiCDBG funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such activities. 26 3. a plan that provides for and encourages citizen participation, with 27 particular eal~hasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income who are residents 28 of slum analalighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used, and provides for_ 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 participation of residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods; 4. reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the ACT; 5. provides for public meetings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities and review of program performance, which meetings shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped; (d) CITY shall develop a community development plan, for the period of this Agr. eement; that identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community development objectives. (el CITY certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the CITY, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. 3. The CITY shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants 4 and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certi~ and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. (f) In accordance with Section 519 Public Law 101-144, (the 1990 HUD Appropriations Act), the CITY certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations, and that it has adopted and is enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 jurisdiction. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH POLICY AND PROGRAM OBIECTIVES. Policy and program objectives as required by applicable federal regulations for the efficient administration of the CDBG program will be adopted by COUNTY°s Board of Supe~/isors, and COUNTY and CITY will adhere to said policy and program objectives. 6. OTHER AGREEMENTS. Pursuant to federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.501 (b), CITY is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement of a written agreement set forth in federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.503. For each fiscal year during the term of this Agreement, COUNTY and CITY shall enter into a Supplemental Agreement that will have a term coinciding with a Program Year and enumerate the project(s) CITY will implement with its entitlement funds. Said Supplemental Agreement will set forth the time schedule for completion of said project(s) and any funding sources, in addition to entitlement funds, that will be used in completing the project(s). If substantial compliance with the completion schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances, cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the project(s) may be extended. If substantial progress toward drawdown of funds is not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated with the project(s) may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice is given CITY. COUNTY's decision not to extend the completion schedule associated with the project(s) or to reprogram the entitlement I funds associated with the project(s) will not excuse CITY from complying with terms of this 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Agreement: 7. DETERMINATION OF pROIECTS TO BE FUNDED AND DISTRIBUTION 18 19 20 OF ENTITLEMENT FUNDS. CITY will, prior to the commencement of a Program Year, designate those projects that it desires to implement with its entitlement funds, said designation to comply with statutory and regulatory provisions governing citizen's participation. Said designation is to be reviewed by the COUNTY's Economic Developr0ent Agency to determine that the project is eligible under federal regulations for funding and inclusion in the annual Consolidated Plan's Action Plan and consistent with both federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors will, consistent with paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of this Agreement, determine the distribution and disposition of all CDBG funds received by COUNTY pursuant to the Act. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MANUAL- CITY warrants that those officers, employees and agents retained by it anCl responsible for implementing those projects funded by CDBG funds have received, reviewed and will follow the Community Development Block Grant Manual that has been prepared by COUNTY and, by this reference, said Manual is incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 9. REAL pROPERTY ACOUIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY CONSTRUCTED WITH 21 CDBG FUNDS- 22 When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part by CITY to acquire real property 23 or to construct a public facility, CITY will comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 24 1969 (42 U.S.C. §§4321, et seq.), the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Resources 25 Code §§21000, et seq.), the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition 26 Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.5.C. §§4630, et seq.), California Government Code Sections 7260 27 et seq., as those Acts may be amended from time to time and any federal or state regulations 28 issued to implement the aforementioned laws. I In addition, the following is to occur: 2 (a) Title to the real property shall vest in CITY; 3 (b) the real property will be held by or the constructed facility will be 4 maintained by the CITY until five years after the date that the CITY is no longer participating with 5 the County in the CDBG entitlement program and is no longer considered by HUD to be a part 6 of the Urban County CDBG program. 7 (c) while held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to be used 8 exclusively for the purpose for which a_cquisition or construction was originally approved by 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COUNTY; (d) CITY shall provide timely notice to COUNTY of any action which would result in a modification or change in the use of the real property purchased or improved, in whole or in part with CDBG or HOME funds from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement, including disposition. (el CITY shall provide timely notice to citizens and opportunity to comment on any proposed modification or change; (el Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or the facility is to be put to an alternate use that is or is not consistent with federal regulations governing CDBG funds; (O Should CITY desire during the five (5) year period to use the real property or the constructed facility for a purpose not consistent with applicable federal regulations governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then: (1) If CITY desires to retain title, it will have to reimburse either COUNTY or the federal government an amount that .represents the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the facility; or (2) if CITY sells the property or facility or is required to sell the property or .facility, CITY is to reimburse either the COUNTY of the federal government an amount that represents the percentage of proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that 7 :' CDBG funds comprised monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the facility. This percentage amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sale proceeds. 10. DISPOSITION OF INCOME GENERATED BY THE EXPENDITURE OF CDBG FUNDS. 1 2 3 4 5 CITY shall inform COUNTY of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG 7 funds received by CITY from COUNTY. CITY may not retain any program income so generated. 8 Any and all program income shall be returned to the County and may only be used for eligible 9 activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements, including all requirements for citizen 10 participation. 11 COUNTY has the responsibility for monitoring and reporting to HUD on the use 12 of any such program income, thereby requiring appropriate record keeping and reporting by CITY 13 as may be needed and requested by COUNTY. 14 11. TERMINATION. 15 This Agreement may not be terminated by either CITY or COUNTY, nor may the 16 CITY or COUNTY withdraw from this Agreement or any of the terms of this Agreement. 17 12. FORMER AGREEMENTS UTILIZING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 18 GRANT FUNDS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY. 19 All agreements between CITY and COUNTY regarding the use of CDBG funds for 20 fiscal years 1975-76 through 1999-2000 and any Supplemental Agreements thereunder, shall 21 remain in full force and effect. If the language of this Agreement is in conflict or inconsistent 22 with the terms of any prior said agreements between CITY and COUNTY, the language of this 23 Agreement will be controlling. 24 13. INDEMNIFICATION 25 CITY agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless COUNTY and its authorized 26 officers, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, 27 and/or liability arising from CITY acts, errors or omissions and for any costs or expenses incurred 28 by COUNTY on account of any claim therefore, except where such indemnifications is 8 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 prohibited by law. CITY shall promptly notify COUNTY in writing of the occurrence of any such claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability. CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY against any liability, claims, losses, demands, and actions incurred by COUNTY as a result of the determination by HUD or its successor that activities undertaken by CITY under the program(s) fail to comply with any laws, regulations or policies applicable thereto or that any funds billed by and disbursed to CITY under this Agreement were improperly expended. Dated: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board ,1999 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Deputy By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: CITY OF TEMECULA By: City Clerk By: Chief Executive Officer, Mayor COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATION The Office of the County Counsel hereby certifies that the terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized under state and local law and that the Agreement provides full legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel By: Deputy F:\USERS\CDBG\CW~URBAN'd COOPOOO3.wpd 9 ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN,~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Maintenance Facility Furniture PREPARED BY: Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an expenditure to Pacific Business Interiors (PBI) in the amount of $67,433.65 to purchase fumiture that will be installed in the Maintenance Facility office additions and modifications. BACKGROUND: Dudng the November 17, 1998 meeting, the City Council approved an expenditure in the amount of $41,170 to purchase fumiture to be installed into City Hall office modifications in the Redevelopment and Community Development departments. This first phase of office/workstation modifications were completed in December to accommodate the growing number of City employees needed to manage construction projects. As discussed dudng the November meeting, the second phase of increasing office space for City employees has involved constructing offices and workstations in the City's Maintenance Facility. In order to maintain consistency between the City and Maintenance Facility furniture, Staff obtained a quote from Pacific Business Interiors (PBI), who provided the fumiture for City Hall. The current quote from PBI is consistent with pdor quotes for similar items. When City Hall was moved to its new location in October of 1996, PBI was originally selected through a competitive bid process to be the City's modular fumiture provider. This uniformity is important because it allows the City to purchase matching modular furniture to keep consistency throughout City Hall. It also keeps the cost of future office modifications to a minimum as PBI can use furniture from both City Hall and the Maintenance Facility to accommodate future changes. To complete this Maintenance Facility construction project, Staff is requesting that the City Council approve this fumiture purchase. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $67,433.65 have been Allocated in the FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program Maintenance Facility Project budget which is proposed for Council adoption July 13, 1999. i.>acificm Interiors II · PacJllo BuMless IMe~ors ~_~d~__'; Eranero Ave.. F me Cairohis Business bierbin 12801 Busch Place SsntsFeSpdnge, CA90670 T 562-903-7600 F 562~)41~7Z0 Quotation 63.924 0S/24/99 -ze4010 MANDY DFZ'RICK O. UO~IE TO:. ACCOU!rfil I:,A.YAg,T,G CITY OF ~ P-0, 31tOX 9033 ~eleeuLla, CA 92589 SHIP TO: GAlL ZIG~E CITY OF I~ECUEdt 43200 BUSINESS P/~ DRIVE Temeeulao CA 92589 P: 1.909.69i.6430 P: 1.909.693.3994 F: 1-909.69%.6479 F: 1.909.694.6479 TorlTts ~ DUB 30 DAYS .... - ........ :-- - .; ' ~ ;.;__ .:/f:.. ~, ---~ . .--. - "" ;-r( ' ' ... ' - -.~ ~ ..... , .... ' 7:" ' * ~ Y~-~ ~ ~ OF 6-24-99 * * P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~-~g, S~T~ ~ * D~ ~ 1 56 ~ D~ 16.80 940.80 ~Y, G W/ 10~ U~, ~0 X 2 ~/4 X ~2 =4674 ~T Tag POt: LT 2 56 ~RPFll D]ETAXLS 35.40 1,982.40 EAPERFbOMAI~tC~-RJtZL!ejugr~u STD, 14 3/SXllX10 BASIC :4674 IfiTRAT Tag For= 1~ 3 3.gWRS30U DBTAI"iaS 37.20 706.80 ~JLT_B-ASSEMgLy,W/USalBRACKBT 30WAI>PL,29 1/2W 3ABIC :4674 WHEAT Tag For: R30 4 2 WRS42U DET3LT_LS 42.00 84.00 P3LTL-ASS~LY, W/USA1 ~T 42WAPPL, 41 1/2W BASIC :4674 BeRRAT Tag For= R42 ZO0~ HOINKT~I S~e 3Vd tTSgeSgtlt XVa Ot:gT/TWIT. 66/tg/90 8anls Fe ~ CA T562-903-7600 F 562~41~770 Quotation 61924 06/24/q9 TEM010 MAMDY DFZ'R"rCtr,, [XJOTE TO,. ACCOUN'I~ DAYAI3Z~ CI'X'X' O'L"" ~ P.O. BOX 9033 Temec-,ula, CA 92589 ~ TO: CITY OF ~ 43200 BT/SI~qESS DA~K DRIVE TemecnAla, CA 92589 P: 1,909.694.6430 P: 1.909.693.3994 P: 1.909.694.6479 F: 1.909.694.6479 Terms m. T rots 30 DAYS " ,- -,~...v " "~:~:'~-~-~ ..........,,._t""",',,"--.,' '.' ...."' ..sF~.."~ ~', ~f .~:::'..E.'--.-*:[:**'-*.:-*.':~:~ ~"'*.-.~ .......~'.:,, '~,,"' 5 20 NY, S45U DSTA.TI.~ 43 _ 20 864.00 I~B, IL-ASSBMBF~y, W~SA1 BRACK:KT 45W/M~PL, 44 B~e~lC :4674 WHKbLT Tag For= R&5 6 ? 28LZ~UT FaCYrT.Rn 8.00 56,00 20 NATT/aeJ4P Tag For; LAMP28 7 24 40LIGFr RK'i'YC~.RD 9.60 230-40 30NATTI,NqP Tag For: JjAM~40 Tag For: BC4SGOR 9 ? 90PTCOR2245'/5L P3gClq'r-~ 188.80 1,321.60 'ROP, F~RFACS-C0Ra~ER, EXTENDED, ~~,~, 25X25X75X&5 r-~ ~ DRI~ ~~ ~ WILS~T ~ ~~ rag Fort K'w/S45b 10 ? 9013TC~R224575E~ 188.80 1,321.60 WOP/T~UI~FAC~-C0RI~R,EKTEIqDED# LAMINATE,~,25X25X45X75 T-Ie3LD: DRIFTWOOD ACCE~ITD BY TITLE DATE coel~l HOI)!ff-T~I SQ~ ~Vd )TSZSSZfT~ XVa TW:~T ~KT. 86/fZ/90 Interiors Ee Sam Fe~mtngs, CAg(:N~0 T562-903-7600 F 562~41-677q) Quotation Page: 3 61924:06/24/_.c9 J'fi~4010 .v~ed,{D*,/' DE'I~.TCE QUOTE 1'O: ACC(XJHTS PA"Z2~,.BLE CITY OF TBNEC'm.A P.O. BOX 9033 Temec, ula, CA 92589 StePTO: GAIL CETYOPT]D4ECULA 43200 B13~3]QE$$ PA.E~DRI**VE Temecrula, CA. 92589 Tag For~ BC4S?SR 11 I 901YI'C'e~R224:S85I, REC'YCT.~ 235.20 235.2(3 WORK$'0RPAC~-COEHER# lr.A--nausu, LAM'r~, T,n, 2SX25Xe4:X45 Tag ~or: RC844SL 2~t43 l~r: BC4:27523R rag For: E~754232L 14 7 99824 R, BCYrff,Rn 80.00 560.00 TASK LZQIFF-BCT~I:PSR 28W PAI]fT: 4762 CRFJkM Tag For: ACCEIq~) BY %ep, E DA'I~ f0O~ h'0IN~tf~I Sag Dva tTSZSSZfT~ l'Va Tt:gT QBJ, 66/tZ/90 Pacificn Bu ,iess Intedors II · Padt~ Business kmdNs ~ Emdem Ave., #100 T323-724-O393 F 323-889-6162 Ee Quotation 61924 06/24/99 TI~010 ~tANDY DETRICK ~N)TET~-ACCOGNTS PAYABLE CITY OF ~4ECOL~ P,O. BOX 9033 TemCC~tla, CA 92589 8HiT O; GAIL ZIGT.RI~ CITY OF TEI~ECOLA 43200 BOSl~BSS PARK DRIVE Te~ec~tla, CA 92589 P: 1,909,694,6430 P; 1.909.693.3994 F: 1,909,694,6479 F: 1,909.69i.6479 Terms IfET DO~ 30 E~T3 ~..; --. :'~"'. !. ':', :.., ..............~ .....!i~'= "': ::' "~ "'~ ' -i:' "' ......' .... ' ZS 22 99825 RECYCLED 83,20 1,830,40 TASK LZGitT-BCLZPS; 40W P~: 4762 ~ Tag Fox; TL37 16 20 CB20LP RECYd!J~ 15.36 307.20 CANTIL]EVE~-L~,23-S/SD Tag FOr: C20L 17 24 CB20RP RBC3~ff_-~n 15,36 368.6· CRRTIEaEVBR-~3t,23-5/ED TN3 FOr: C20R 18 15 CBS25P RJI~CYCaJID 23.36 350.40 CANTIEEV~R-SBAF~D, NOelBANDED, 23-3/&D Tag For: SC 19 6 1~25P PaLeY.~Ln~- 75.20 451,20 EaNEL-~ND,N~N~AND;D, 25X27 *IASIC.-STANDARD PAINT ·762 Tag For: BIt2 20 · TM2525 RK--'ym.Rn 49.60 198.40 WOP, KBURF'ACB - rrl~GHT/J~lrlq~T!, A(;CIPYtlCE ~I/jiJr~r 10 / lIB ~oe~] ~OIX~LT~I SQg 3VJ tTIZe~ZtIl ITa It:IT nKT. 66/fl/I0 LesAngeles. CAeO040 F 3234MH)4162 me Calfomk 8usemss Inmriors 12801 Busch Place T,~rZ-83gg,,7600 F 5e2-g41-6770 Quotation Page= 5 61924 06/24/g9 TEM010 ~e21DY DgTRICX SHep TO:, CITY OF TJ~4ECULA 43200 BUSIIq]~8 PAEKDEXVE Temecula, CA 92589 P; 1,909_694.6430 P: 1,909_693.399& F: 1,909,694,6479 F: 1,909,694,6479 Terms zesT ]x3 30 DAYS 25X25 T-~ = ~I~ Tag Pot: N2525 21 2 TM2530 R.Et'M'CX, ED S1.20 WORESTIR. YAC38-STRAZGETT.LAMINATE, 25X30 · T-NOT.n: DRIFTWOOD 102,40 Tag For: N2530 22 I TH2560 R.K'yrTr_.n'r~ 97 - 60 rA'OEraIiP-YAC~- ST3EU%ZOZLT, LAMINATE, 25X60 T-HOED: DBiE~ LAMINATB: WILBCX:IART ~ LEATrIBE 97.60 23 3 AC~SI'TB) BY Tag For: W2560 980 12 PJgZCq/rn'.sm PA.~gIr-TACT, ABEa ACOITaTICAL, 25X42 BINC~ -- 6608 DRIY'rwOOu SaRF-X :5999 SPECIAL FABRIC Vendor: G13rO5 -(XTIL.w'0RD OF MAIN*B, Pur~_-~_~ser: Vnd Pa~:~:ezu; 3549-RAKU Color: 04O-DRTSM 91393-2 : 5999 RPBCIAT~ FRgRzC Vendor: (K13:05 -GUILFORD OF NAX]LTB, Purv~.~ser: Vnd Pa==ern: 3548-RAKU Color: 040-1~ZSM N:X:~FrAm;E meTTO Tf:JmSAIe co,~xno,ls. TITLE 149.44 448.32 9001ZI ~0IR~tf~I S~e 3Va PTgZe~Z~T~ IY~ Zt:gl llH3, 66/tZ/90 i acificm Bu ine Int II · LomAngdmS, CAgO0,1CI T323-~ F 323-889,6162 Be Quotation Pale: 61924 06/24/,~9 TXM0Z0 MANDY DETRICK ~XITET~-ACC(X31rtS PAYABI~ CI'I'[OPTR!q]L"'[rLA P.O. BOX 9033 Temecula, CA92589 IHIP T0: 43200 Xr0SZNBSS PARKDR:EVE Temec~Lla, CA 92589 P: 1,909.694.6430 P: 1,909.693.3994 F: 1,909,694,6479 F; 1.909.694.6479 Terms ~ D[r~ 30 D~F3 T2:]:M :4762 CRX3M ~ag For: 4225 24 201.60 604.80 25 15 Tag For: 4242 169.92 2,548.80 DATE ~O0~ HOINKT~I Sfl~l 3Va )IgZiSZfI~ lV~ t):9[ rlKE 86/)Z/90 l. cificm Business Interiors II · I.J~Ang~CAg(XMO T 323-'/24.-~_"__'-,Z,_ F 3214M!1,.6162 Ee 1~ I~kmachPhme 8amFeS, l:xings, CAg0670 T 562,,,903-7600 F 562,,941..r/"/0 Quotation PEgre_ 7 mSOTETO:-ACCOONTS PAYABLB: P,O, BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 ~ TO: GAIL CITY OF TEMECOLA 43200 BOSINBS8 PAP, K DRIVE Tem,~cula, C3k 9~589 P-- 1.909,694,6430 P: 1,909,693,3994 F: 1,909,694,6479 F; 1.909.694.6479 Tef'r~8 ]IIBT DOI 30 DAYS TRIN ;4762 CPJr, AM For: 6525 26 24 98213 EECY~ 193.92 4.654.08 P/BalBL-TACF. ABXaXCOOSTICAL0 30X65 BZNGIg :6608 DRIFTWOOD ~U.KP'-I :5999 BPECIAL 1TABRXC Vendorz G13'I05 -Gv0=LFURDOFMAINE, Puznhseer: Vud Pattern= 3548-ERXO Colo=: 040-PRISM SOBLF-2 :5999 8[:~*CIAL F'AB~IC- Vendor: G~XOS -6RYILFORDOFMAINE, I Purnhaser: VDd Pattern: 3548-F/ED Color; 040-P2ISM :4762 ~ 2"7 32 Tag For: 6530 98215 %5X65 ~ :6608 DRIFTROOD ,B'~g.F-1 =S999 SPBCZALFAB3~C Vendort PatCen: 35~8-~ ~lor= ~-2 :5999 8PBC~~IC Pat~em: 3548-~ Color: 233-92 7,485.44 ACCI~'rB) Iv DA~ 900~ 80IR'R,T~I s~s 3va ~IgZssz~IL lva t~:gI fiEL 66/~g/90 me Quotation Pege:_ 8 61924 06/24/99 Tg~010 MI~qDY (~R)TE TO: AC~Oumx~ PAYABE~ CITY OF T~4ECaLA P.O. BOX 9033 Temeuula, CA 92589 ~ TO: GAIL ZIGT3R CITY OF T~ECULA 43200 BUSINESS P/M~ D~IV~ Temecu/a, CA 92589 Tag For: 6545 28 5 98219 ]UL"Y~T.~T~ 233.92 1,169.60 PANE%-~ & ~65 N~ :6608 DRIED ~-1 ;5999 V~r: ~OS -~~ OF COlor: 040-~IBM S~-2 :5999 V~or: ~05 Pat=em; 35~8-~ ~lOr: 040-PRI~ ~ : 4762 Tag For: 6542 29 9 986694C $TEELC3~ 118.46 1,066.1& BASE POW!~ IN-& CIRCT, TRIPT~X, · /2- ccmD~T/e'Lmm,Oau,,D Tag Pot: BPI 30 19 98680 STRRT~ 65,00 1,235.Q0 FILL~aPOST-C01~T~,STD~OP CAP _!LPPL, 65H ~IC :t762 ~ Tag For: r6S soot8 A~:.,~.~-iANCE~JB. IECTT01Tdlk~Am)C01R21TIONS. 11TLE DATE Bgllr~TNI S~8 ;:)Vd 'I, TS'ZeSZWT& IY...l t'l, :gT nKT. 66/)Z/90 ]L acificm hatedors I! Cab Business t2N31 Busch Place RtnM Fe 8pebgs, CA90670 T 562-~3-7600 F 562.e41-677D Quotation Page: 9 61924 06/2,A/~9 TJg4010 HANDY ~JOTE TO:. ~t~z$ PAYA5I,S CZTY OF ?!g4~CU/A P.O. BOX 9033 Temecq.g.a, C~ 92589 SHIP TO: G~IL ZI~T.x~. ~ITY OF T~EC~Jt 43~00 BUSINFxS-~ P~tK DRIVE Temecula, C~t ~529 P-' 1,909,694.6430 ~: 1.909.693.3994 F: 1.909.694.64'79 F: 1.909.694.6479 Terms NXT Dl:]]g 30 DA_Y8 ~'~ii' '~ ....':' ': ; .......:- ,.,.-;;;;;i' ' .-. ...."*~ *..u...~,.."~ .............' ...: : --. ............ 31 3 986831D~q~,5~ ~ B9,'70 269,10 /4 C1'~,3+D, 15 AMP,X,~ 1,C'1'R/6 PLASTIC :6608 DRIIPEW[M3D Tag For: 32 3 986832DA~S$ STEEE~ZA~ 89.70 RBC~PTACEa-D~P.3 CKT,~D; /4 C~T,3+D,15 AMP,LI~B 2,CTN/6 PLASTIC: 6608 DP-TFTW00D 269.10 Tag For: L2 269.10 Tag For: w.3 34 3 986834DA15B S~ 117.00 P3~C]~YI~PT3-D~.4 CX~CT, 3+D, PEkB, STIC :6608 D~IYTW00D 351.00 Tag For: 35 4 986924P 8TEELCA~ POWERWRa~-PA31EL, 4 CIRC~3IT. 25W TBg For: L:q~5 97.501 390.00 36 19 97.50 1,852.50 0T01~ a0l~f~I S~E DVd fTggeSZfT~ IYH Sf:gT ~ 86/fg/90 l. ific. lnteriw II · tasAIlgele~CAg0040 F 323-Begk6162 me California Business Iredora 12801 Busch Place 8anla Fe Slxings, CA 90670 T 562-903-7600 F 562-941~77T) Quotation Page: 10 61924 06/24/,c9 T]~M01O MANDY DET~ZCK ~JOTETO:ACCO[]NT~ PXTABLR CZTYOF P.O. BOX 9033 Temu-eula, C~ 92509 SIIPT0: GAI~ ZZCn-.~R. CITY OF ~ 43200 BT]~INESS PAPXDRIV~ Temec~la, CA 92589 P: 1.909-694.6430 P: 1.909.693.3994 F: 1.909.694.6479 F: 1.909.694.6479 Tenns NsT DUB 30 DAYS 37 32 986954P S~~ 97.50 3,120.00 ~~-P~, 4 C~T, 45W ~g ~r: ~45 38 2 986964P STnq~__z/~8 97.50 195,00 :POT~E~WAY-9ANEL, 4 CIRCII/iT,60W Tag For: PW60 39 S 97,50 780,00 98699~P ~ ~O,~AAY-PANEL,4 CIRCT]TT,42W TegP~r; PW42 .Tag Fur= B30 41 22 9BBL4515 BECqZCT, BD 128.32 2,823.04 BIN-STOP3~3E, P~q~L SUPPORTED, 1DOOR,E~)CK, 14-7/BX45X16-5/S BASIC ;4762 C1~E3~4 hOCK :9201 POLI~RRDCH9/38~ EEYS :SK]U~!D Tag For: B45 42 8 290_40 2,323.20 ACC~TED BY TITLE- DATE TTOI[I I~01W;ET~I SQg ~Va tTgZeSZtTZ lV~ SF:gT ~gT. 66/f;/90 Bushess hlte I1 · LosAngeles, GAg00,10 T3Z)-724-Ga~ F 323-ee9,~62 Quotation Page: 61924 06/24/99 TEM010 MANDY DETRICI ~JOTETO:~ PAYABIa Crxf OF T~ P.O. BOX 9033 Teeecu/a, CA 92589 SHFTO: GAIL ZXCn.R~ CITY OF ~'~4BCTA3k 43200 B~3ZNBSS PAgKDRIVE Temecula, CA 92599 P: 1.909.694.6430 P: 1.909.693.3994 F: 1,909,694.6479 F: 1.909.694.6479 Terms NET DU~ 30 DAYS : SK S~ 8 99465 ~bv~ m MR~ ~y Tag FOr: BBF25 Tag For: FF25 44 3 MF~830BBFL fF'/'XELCAf~ 344.37 1,033.11 PEDBSTAL-I'~m~-qTA_W!DZE~3, 2 ~X, 1 ~ ~, ~,A~ ~, 30X15~7 :4762 ~ = 9201 ~nX8~ ~ :4762 ~ : SK S~ 99465 ~1~ ~Y Tag For: BBF30 45 14 4535330 STR'RT~3%,.q 468.13 6,553.82 t-q3 CI~AI~-OPIqL, PNIE~ I~'T,MID AC(~I~B) BY IraaLE DATE ZTO~ ~Olmq~TNI S~ DVJ tTSZQSZFTL l"Fa 9t:eT illEL e6/tZ/90 lnterk II [] Padik~lmee~ ~ ~Ave, #100 T~~ F 32~-889-61~ le Ire ~s4ngs. CA gO670 5624M1~'770 Quotation Pege: 12 eJOT~TO:ACCO1;IFr8 PAYABLB CITY OF 1-jgqECIILA P.O, BOX 9033 TemeCn/la, CA92589 SlIPTO: GAlL ZIG~,R~ CIT~OF T]~2UIA 43200 BUS~$ PARK DEIVE Temeeula, CK 92589 P: 1.909.694.6430 P; 1,909,693.3994 F; 1,909.694.E479 ~: 1.909.69&.6479 Terms NgT a 30 DAYS UPwr-nTIIY:B351 53 I 4581224 -qTRI~A~ 549.38 549.38 458 CHAIR-DESKtSZ 2,lIT BK, "Ow ~,P;; P~C :6205 ~a ~~X:~09 ~ For: DESK C]~kIR FOR THE OFNXCB AT MAZXTmqANC~YARD 54 2 474419M STm~T_~/~8 386.94 773.88 474 CHAIR-GUBST,0PR~RACK,ARM, ~ ;6205 ~K vedor: ~1o -~sI~F~XCS Pattemz 2238-~~ Color: 601-~ rag ~or: GUEgT CHAIR FOR TI~ OFFXC~: AT TH~ ~e=Fr~M~CXyRAD 55 32 DESIGN PACIFIC 65. O0 DESIGN TIME e SIS-00 PER BO~R Tag For: DFal~q 2,080.00 56 3,440.39 3,440.39 CZo~l 66/fZ/90 !. acirlcl i usiness Interiors IN · · D5 Emslem Ave~ I1OD T323-~ F 323ee4162 CeIemb Busiess kdekn 12801 _e_~,~_ Phlce T 562-903-7600 F 562-941-6770 Quotat;on PaW~- X3 61924 06/24/99 _,~OlO QJR)TETO:.~ PAYABLE CITY OF TEaRCUBA P.O. BOX 9033 Temecul&, CA 92589 GAZL ZIGLRR CITY OFTI~BCUIJ~ 43200 BUSIRESS PARKDRIVE Temecula. CA92589 S~ Total RIVERSIDE COUNTY SALES TAX Total A~~ tTOa AiXXffrrANCESUij~CTTOi~AND(X)fiXnQNS. - i//~ DATE HCIIR'P--T~T Slltl ;:)Vcl tTS'ZeSZtTZ, IT.4 Z,T,:gI ftTT. f. 66/WZ/90 tlh cm 15~1 ]~I!!LL AVE 8urr~A ~IBTIN CAL!EOI~IIA92780 PAX 714.258 2814 Fax Cover Sheet hn~ 24° 1999 909-694-6488 Hello Oail: :Finally!!!! TI~ Mnintemnce Ym'd 2'/floor quote for axe cubicles, sealing, nnd Delatls. I have vzvised Ihe Sil~.~.h.._~ quote since 1t~ o~oe archi!~ure h~_~ chnnge~ Yon correct, when Signnlxu~ sent us pricing they had put list where w~ had written cost, so Pleasseallwithmyquestions. Hsv~sgre~va~afi~. If yow do m~ raciMe a!I paS, em plea. ve ~dl (714) 25&2700. I00 ~l IlOIlrlY~II Sllll DVd I,I~lOSZI'IA IV4' Ot: 9I IIKL 86/tZ/90 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL E~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER / CITY OF TEMECULA (~(,)(,' t"" AGENDA REPORT ~ '- Mayor and City Council RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: APPROVE a furniture purchase from Pacific Business Interiors (PBI) in the amount of $41,170. ,/ APPROPRIATE $41,170 from the General Fund Undesignated Fund Balance for furniture. APPROVE a transfer, from the General Fund Operating Budget in the amounts of: $13,500 from Building and Safety , $10,000 from Engineering /$ 5,000 from Public Works BACKGROUND: The increased activity of each City department, coupled with the addition of regular employees (most notably in Engineering) has made it necessary to create additional office space. In order to create this additional space, we are making modifications to the Maintenance Facility and City Hall. The Maintenance Facility modifications, namely adding work stations in the employee break room and building a public counter, will allow us to move the Building Inspectors and Code Enforcement employees to this facility. These employees spend the majority of their day in the field and moving them out of City Hall will not negatively impact our customer service. The City Hall modifications include moving the Redevelopment offices into the Community Development area, which will allow for more Public Works office space. Additional changes include reducing the size of the Copy Center, relocating the Community Development Receptionist to the lobby area and adding two offices for the Fire Marshall and the Housing and Redevelopment Manager. Staff is currently in the process of obtaining quotes for this project. The architect's estimate to complete the work is between $22,000 and $28,000. In order to complete these changes, we are requesting that the City Council approve a furniture purchase, in the amount of $41,170, with PBI. This order is broken down as follows: :. Community Development Reception Area Four New Community Development Workstations Workstations for Redevelopment New Private Office Furniture Additional Chairs for Offices and Workstations ~,m.i.',.. PBI was awarded the contract to furnish City Hall. They continue to provide quality "'~. '~'~ s~r,~cR arid supported the Space Planning Committee with many design alternatives while · !" re bei.g p,a..ed. :' 'j FISCA~IMPACT: An appropriation from-the General Fund Undesignated Fund Balance in the amount of $41,170 is required for the furniture purchase as well as budget transfers from the Building and Safety, Engineering and Public Works Departments Line Item to the CIP fund to pay for the City Hall modification project. $ 5,770 ~/~-~i,~t,'~,~/, 9,000 12,360 '~ 6,340 7,700 ,~. ,: ITEM 10 APPROVAL ~ CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC'E ACTING CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Acting City Manager/City Council Anthony J. Eimo, Chief Building Official July 13, 1999 Street Name - Nada Ln. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: That the City Council: RESOLUTION NO. 99-__ "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING A PORTION OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY TO THE STREET NAME NADA LN" DISCUSSION: Staff has received a request from the Meadowview Homeowners Association to change the name of a portion of North General Kearny Rd. to Nada Lane. The portion of North General Kearney Road in question is within the Meadowview area and extends between Calle Madero and Valle Olvera. This portion of roadway has no connection to North General Kearny, which extends to the northwest through Roripaugh Ranch. This connection is not included in the General Plan circulation element. Therefore, it is felt that the street has no connection to other sections of North General Kearny and a street name change would be appropriate. Along with the requested name change to Nada Lane, the following street names were also suggested: Arroyo Road Charro Way La Paz Lane Siesta Lane La Linda Lane Angelina Lane FISCAL IMPACT: None R; \I~ROCKMEI \AGENDA \NADA LN. DOC 1 7/1/99 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING A PORTION OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY TO A STREET NAME NADA LN. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, Section 34091.1 and 34081.1 and 34092 of the Government Code provides for changing the name of a public street, and: WHEREAS, there are no affected property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula determines and orders that the name of a portion of North General Keamy be changed to Nada Ln. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:'iBROCKMEIXP,.ESOSXBOSTIK.WPD 7/1/99 cb ITEM 11 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst,~,, That the City Council approve the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 99-,_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE "FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION BACKGROUND: In the Spring of 1998, the City of Temecula was asked to and did oppose Proposition 224, which would have prevented state and local governments from contracting out with qualified private engineers and architects. In November, 1998, Proposition 224 was defeated by the voters. Unfortunately, subsequent to the November vote, the initiators of Proposition 224 appealed the Legislature's interpretation of the constitution, and the California Supreme Court upheld the initiators' interpretation. This means that state government is essentially banned from contracting out to private sector consultants for design services, and these services must be assigned in-house. The resulting effect is that huge bottlenecks will occur at agencies such as CALTRANS, since only their own engineers can design all of their projects, including those that affect local agencies. If this policy is allowed to remain in place, then the City risks losing all control over local project designs. The Council will lose the ability to decide when, where, and how to complete a project because State agencies will be the driving force in project scheduling. To remove this ban from using private consultants for design projects, Assembly Bill 1448 has been introduced to the State Legislature. If this legislation does not pass, an initiative has been introduced to place this issue on the March, 2000 ballot. By passing the attached resolution, the City of Temecula will be on record as a strong proponent of the proposed legislation and initiative. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Resolution No. 99-__ Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Initiative Assembly Bill No. 1448 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE~ CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE "FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WI~F~REAS, the population growth in California has increased the demand for infrastructure projects such as highways, schools, prisons, and flood control; and, WHEREAS, the need for state and local governments to contract to the private sector for architectural and engineering services has never been greater; and, WHEREAS, a series of successrid lawsuits has changed the ability for the State of California to contract out architectural and engineering services to prevent these lawsuits from continuing; and, WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1448 and an initiative, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act, have been introduced into the State Legislature to allow state and local government agencies to use private architects and engineers; and, WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act will encourage competition between not only private sector entities, but also between public sector agencies. WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act requires architectural and engineering contracts to be subject to normal accountin~ practices and requires normal audits when necessary to ensure that contracts are delivered promptly. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Temecula supports the "Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" for architectural and engineering services both as an initiative and as legislation. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this __ day of ,1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Initiative for Architectural and Engineering Service 1. Permits Contracting Out of Architectural and Engineering Services: Allows state and local governments, special districts and school districts to contract with private companies for architectural and engineering services. Defines such services as architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, engineering, land surveying and construction management. 2. Local Choice to Deliver Transportation Projects On-Time: Gives local governments greater control over transportation improvements so that highway, bridge and transit projects can be delivered on-time and within budget. Taxpayer Safeguards: · Prohibits government employees from awarding contracts if they have a financial or business relationship with the companies involved. · Requires compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts of interest or unlawful activities. · Subjects all architecture and engineering contracts to standard accounting practices. · Permits financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. 4. Strict Design and Construction standards: Already established project seismic safety, project design and construction standards are not changed by the initiative. 5. Only Applies to Architectural and Engineering Services: This measure does not apply to any other contracts except for architecture and engineering services. For example, it does not apply to peace officers, teachers or correction officers. 5/17/1999 Taxpayers for Fair Competition 111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406 · Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 · Fax: (650) 340-1740 11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 · Los Angeles, CA 90064 · (310) 996-2600 · Fax: (310) 996-2673 FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS INITIATIVE SECTION 1. TITLE. This measure shall be known and may be cited as the "Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act." SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT. tt is ',he intent of the people of the Stateof California in enacting this measure: (a) To remove existing restrictions on contracting for architectural and engineering services and to allow state, regional and local governments to use qualified private architectural and engineering firms to help deliver transportation, schools, water, seismic retrofit and other infrastructure projects safely, cost effectively and on time; (b) To encourage the kind of public/private partnerships necessary to ensure that California taxpayers benefit from the use of private sector experts to deliver transportation, schools, water, seismic retrofit and other infrastructure projects; (C) To promote fair competition so that both public and private sector architects and engineers work smarter, more efficiently and ultimately. deliver better value to taxpayers; (d) To speed the completion of a multi-billion dollar backlog of highway, bridge, transit and other projects; (e) To ensure that contracting for architectural and engineering services occurs through a fair, competitive selection process, free of undue political influence, to obtain the best quality and value for California taxpayers; and (f) To ensure that private fn'ms contracting for architectural and engineering services with governmental entities meet established design and construction standards and comply with standard accounting practices and permit financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. SECTION 3. Article XXII is hereby added to the California Constitution to read: § 1. The State of Califomia and all other governmental entities, including, but not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school districts and other special districts, local and regional agencies and joint power agencies, shall be allowed to contract with qualified private entities for architectural and engineering services for all public works of improvement. The choice and authority to contract shall extend to all phases of project development including permitting and environmental studies, rights-of-way services, design phase services and construction phase services. The choice and authority shall exist without regard to funding sources whether federal, 0001 state, regional, local or private, whether or not the project is programmed by a state, regional or local governmental entity, and whether or not the completed project is a part of any State owned or State operated system or facility. § 2. Nothing contained in Article VII of this Constitution shall be construed to limit, restrict or prohibit the State or any other govemmental entities, including, but not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school districts and other special districts, toeal and regional agencies and joint power agencies, from contracting with private entities for the performance of architectural and engineering services. SECTION 4. Chapter 10.1 is hereby added to Division 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code to read: § 4529.10. For purposes of Article XXII of the California Constitution and this act, the term "architectural and engineering services" shall include all architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, engineering, land surveying, and construction project management services. § 4529.11. All projects included in the State Transportation Improvement Program programmed and funded as interregional improvements or as regional improvements shall be subject to Article XXII of the California Constitution. The sponsoring govemmental entity shall have the choice and the authority to contract with qualified private entities for architectural and engineering services. For projects programmed and funded as regional improvements, the sponsoring govemmental entity shall be the regional or local project sponsor. For projects programmed and funded as interregional improvements, the sponsoring governmental entity shall be the State of California, unless there is a regional or local project sponsor, in which case the sponsoring governmental entity shall be the regional or local project sponsor. The regional or local project sponsor shall be a regional or local govemmental entity. § 4529.12. All architectural and engineering services shall be procured pursuant to a fair, competitive selection process which prohibits governmental agency employees from participating in the selection process when they have a financial or business relationship with any private entity seeking the contract, and the procedure shall require compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts of interest or unlawful activities. § 4529.13. Nothing contained in this act shall be construed to change project design standards, seismic safety standards or project construction standards established by state, regional or local govemmental entities. ., Nor shall any provision of this act be construed to prohibit or restrict the 0002 SECTION 5. authority of the Legislature to statutorily provide different procurement methods for design-build projects or design-build-and-operate projects. § 4529.14. Architectural and engineering services contracts procured by public agencies shall be subject to standard accounting practices and may require financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. § 4529.15. This act only applies to architectural and engineering services defined in Government Code section4529.10. Nothing contained in this act shall be construed to expand or restrict the authority of governmental entities to contract for fire, ambulance, police, sheriff, probation, corrections or other peace officer services. Nor shall anything in this act be construed to expand or restrict the authority of governmental entities to contract for education services including but not limited to, teaching services, services of classified school personnel and school administrators. § 4529.16. This act shall not be applied in a manner that will result in the loss of federal funding to any governmentai entity. § 4529.17. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. § 4529.18. If any act of the Legislature conflicts with the provisions of this act, this act shall prevail. § 4529.19. This act shail be liberally construed to accomplish its purposes. § 4529.20. This act seeks to comprehensively regulate the matters which are contained within its provisions. These are matters of statewide concern and when enacted are intended to apply to charter cities as well as all other governmental entities. This initiative may be mended to further its purposes by statute, passed in each house by roll call vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, and signed by the Governor. SECTION 6. If there is a conflicting initiative measure on the same ballot, which addresses and seeks to eomprehensively regulate the same subject, only the provisions of this measure shall become operative if this measure receives the highest affirmative vote. 0003 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 12. 1999 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-- 1999-2000 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1448 Introduced by Assembly Member Cox (Coauthors: Assembly Members Campbell, Leach, and Oller) ( Coauthor: Senator Johannessen ) February 26, 1999 An act to add Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 4529.61) to Division 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code, relating to public contracts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1448, as amended, Cox. Public contracts: architectural and engineering services. The California Constitution provides that the civil service includes every officer and employee of the state, subject to specified exceptions. Statutory provisions govern contracting by state and local agencies for architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services. This bill would enact statutory provisions to implement a proposed amendment to the California Constitution related to public contracting for architectural and engineering services. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for 98 AB 1448 -- 2 -- making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1.000.000. This bill would provide that. if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. The people of the State o.f California do enact as follows.' 1 SECTION 1. Chapter 10.3 (commencing with 2 Section 4529.61) is added to Division 5 of Title 1 of the 3 Government Code, to read: 4 5 CHAPTER 10.3. FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER 6 SAVINGS ACT 7 8 4529.61. For purposes of Article XXII of the California 9 Constitution and this chapter, the term "architectural 10 and engineering services" includes shall inchde all 11 architectural, landscape architectural, environmental. 12 engineering, land surveying, and construction project 13 management services. 14 4529.62. All projects included in the State 15 Transportation Improvement Program programmed and 16 funded as interregional improvements or as regional 17 improvements are shall be subject to Article XXII of the 18 Califomia Constitution. The sponsoring governmental 19 entity h'aa shall have the choice and the authority to 20 contract with qualified private entities tbr architectural 21 and engineering services. For projects programmed and 22 funded as regional improvements, the sponsoring 23 governmental entity is shall be the regional or local 24 project sponsor. For projects programmed and funded as 25 interregional improvements, the sponsoring 26 governmental entity is shall be the State of California, 27 unless there is a regional or local project sponsor then in 98 3 AB 1448 1 ~vhich case the sponsoring governmental entity is shall be 2 the regional or local project sponsor. The regional or local 3 project sponsor is the shall be a regional or local 4 governmental entity proposing, nominating, adopting, or 5 submitting the project for enti.ty. inclusion in the State 6 Transportation Improvement Program. 7 ~1529.63. An opcn, publicly advertised, competitive 8 selection process shall bc used by the State of California 9 and all othcr govcrnmcntal entities, including, but not 10 limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, special 11 districts, local and regional agencies, and joint powcrs 12 agcncics, to procurc private architectural and private 13 cnginccring services where the cost of the scrviccs arc 14 projcctcd to cxcc, ed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). 15 '1529.6~1. All architectural and engineering scrviccs 16 procurcd by the State of California and all other l 7 governmental entities, including, but not limited to, 18 cities. counties, citica and counties, spccial districts, local 19 and regional agencies, and joint powers agencies, shall 20 contain a contractual provision that rcquircs thc private 21 entity to bc liablc to the governmental entity. 22 '1529.65. 23 4529. 63. All architectural and engineering services 24 shall be procured pursuant to a procedure that fair, 25 competitive selection process which prohibits 26 governmental agency employees from participating in 27 the selection process i-t: when they have a financial or 28 business relationship with the, any private entity seeking 29 the contract. The contract, and the procedure shall 30 require compliance with all laws regarding political 31 contributions, conflicts of interest, or unlawful activities. 32 '1529.66. This chaptcr docs not 33 4529.64. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be 34 construed to change project design standards, seismic 35 safety standards, or project construction standards 36 established by state, regional, or local governmental 37 entities. This chaptcr docs not Nor shall any provision of 38 this chapter be construed to prohibit or restrict the 39 authority of the Legislature to provide statutorily for 40 statutorily provide different procurement methods for 98 AB 1448 4 1 design-build projects or design-build and operate 2 projects. 3 .1529.67. 4 4529. 65. Architectural and engineering services 5 contracts procured by public agencies arc shall be subject 6 to standard accounting practices and may require 7 financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure 8 that contract services are delivered within the agreed 9 schedule and budget. 10 '1529.68. 11 4529.66. This chapter applics only only applies to 12 architectural and engineering services defined in Section 13 4529.61. This chaptcr docs not Nothing contained in this 14 chapter shall be construed to expand or restrict the 15 authority of governmental entities to contract for fire, 16 ambulance, police, sheriff, probation, corrections, or 17 other peace officer services. This chapter doca not Nor 18 shall anything in this chapter be construed to expand or 19 restrict the authority of governmental entities to contract 20 for education services including, but not limited to, 21 teaching services, services of unclassified classified school 22 personnel, and school administrators. 23 4529.60. 24 4529.67. This chapter veu~ shall not be applied in a 25 manner that results will result in the loss of federal 26 funding to any governmental entity. 27 '1529.70. 28 4529.68. The provisions of this chapter are severable. 29 If any provision of this chapter or its application is held 30 invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or 31 applications that can be given effect without the invalid 32 provision or application. 33 ~1529.71. 34 4529.69. If any other act of the Legislature conflicts 35 with the provisions of this chapter. this chapter will 36 prevail. 37 4529.70. This chapter shall be liberally construed to 38 accomplish its purposes. 39 4529.72. 98 5 AB 1448 1 4529.71. This chapter seeks to comprehensively 2 regulate the matters which are contained within its 3 provisions. These are matters of statewide concern and 4 this chapter. if enacted, i:; when enacted are intended to 5 apply to charter cities as well as all other governmental 6 entities. 7 SEC. 2. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the 8 Government Code, if the Commission on State Mandates 9 determines that this act contains costs mandated by the 10 state, reimbursement to local agencies and school 11 districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 12 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 13 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the 14 claim for reimbursement does not exceed one million 15 dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from 16 the State Mandates Claims Fund. 98 ITEM 12 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council tT~J.~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Tract Map No. 28850 south of Margadta Road between Avertida Sonoma and 160 feet west of Avenida Cima Del Sol PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works i ~.."Annie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDAT~ That the City Council approve: 1. Tract Map No. 28850 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map No. 28850 was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Manager, Debbie Ubnoske, on August 5, 1998 and expiration date being August 5, 2000, The Developer, Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Tract Map No, 28850 is a one (1) lot subdivision, which will contain 141 detached condominium units with two (2) Home Owner's Association maintained recreational/park sites on 20.84 gross acres. This tract is located south of Margarita Road between Avenida Sonoma and 160 feet west of Avenida Cima Del Sol. This site is currently vacant. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 28850: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Tract Map No. 28850 R:~AGDRPT~99\0713\TR28850.doc CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TM 28850 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit R :~,G D R PT~99\0713\TR28850 .doc CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 28850 IMPROVEMENTS Streetand Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY $ 387,500 $ 33,500 $ 1,500 $ 422,500 DATE: July 13, 1999 MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 211,250 SECURITY $ 3,500 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined, $ 0.00 $ Paid $ TBD* $ 102.00 $ 8.00 $ 770:00 $ 1,130.00 $ 1,130.00 $ 0.00 3 R:~AGDRPT~99~0713\TR28850.doc F~ OA D F~ OA D IICINI TY /41 P NOT TO SCALE ITEM 13 APPROVAL glltY ATTORNEY RECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Authorize Temporery Partial Street Closures for Bike Races on July 25 and July 31, 1999. (Business Park Ddve and Single Oak Ddve) i~_Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works PREPARED BY: /~ Albert K. Cdsp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL.A, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25, 1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY 31, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS BACKGROUND: There have been several bicycle races held on the two more appropriate closed courses in the industrial park areas of the City beginning in 1990. One of these courses has been on the Rancho California Business Park course (Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive). The other was on the Winchester Highland Business Park course (Ynez Road, Equity Ddve, and County Center Drive). As these businesslindustdal parks have developed, there has been increased weekday use of these areas. Both of these parks also have church tenants with principal uses on Sunday. Staff requires as a condition of Special Event Permit issuance notification of all affected parties and businesses when such events interfere with the normal flow of traffic. · The Rancho Califomia Business Park course has been used several times as the prime bicycle course with such event sponsors as Team Temecula/Rancho Cycling Club, and most recently the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage Race in 1998. This year, the two current applicants for use of the Rancho Califomia Business Park Course propose to stage their races on Sunday, July 25, 1999, and Saturday, July 31, 1999. Partial street closures will satisfy their racing requirements r:~drptLq9'O713~busparkdrraces Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary dosing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local spedal events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street dudng the temporary dosing". The City Coundl adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public dght of way. While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for delegating authority to temporarily dose streets, or portions of streets, for these special events. The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage Race on July 25, 1999, and the Riverside Cycling Club Race on July 31, 1999. This authority is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Coundl. These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101. A proposed race course and traffic controls are indicated on the attached diagram. Traffic Staff and Police Department will review pdor to issuance of these spedal event permits. All required signs and devices shall be provided by the sponsors/permittees. The sponsors shall post insurance in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 91-96 which adopted standards for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks or public rights of way. Some partial closures, as limiting lane widths for construction purposes or partial closures for "Block Parties" on cul-de-sac streets only, have not been submitted for City Council action in order to reduce the impact on City Council and staff time. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Any police services required for these events will be negotiated by the Police Department and sponsors, and the sponsors shall be responsible for such costs. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 99- 2. Special Event Permit applications (2). 3. Proposed Course Layout. r:~agdrptLq9~0713~busparkdrraces RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CAUFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25, 1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY 31, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The Califomia State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the partial closure of public streets for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club races, for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for the special event: and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily close portions of public streets for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club races on July 25, 1999, and July 31, 1999, respectively: and, NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club races, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage Race on July 25, 1999, and the Riverside Cycling Club Race on July 31, 1999, and and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of July 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk r:%agdrptLq9%0713~busparkdrmces [SE q STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July 1999, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 4 r:~agdrptLqg~0713~usparkdrraces m .... RECEIVED cm,,' "- . ~ -, ,/i MAY 2 8 199~PECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION ~~ CITY OF TEMECUL~TO BE HELD ON PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, ?:~>" ......~"~'~;:ENGINEERING DEPARTML~EWALKS' OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY Bm m SOUND SYSTEMS - NUMBER AND AMPLIFICATION RANGE: 80 90 V~E~/~S/NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS: THE APPLICANT HEREBY STATES THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS ACCURATE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO FULLY COMPENSATE THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR ANY DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY, AS WELL AS TO CLEAN AND OTHERWISE RESTORE THE WENT SITE TO THE C,ONDITION I~l WHCH ~(/~A.,~EHE CONDUCT OF "'~~ ~ E PRINT APPlICANTlAG NAB~E SI~' FOR CITY STAFF USE ONLY: 1. APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT: $ PAID: RECBPT #: 2. SPECIAL EVENT 3. MAJOR SPECIAL WENT [] 4. MEET/CONFER WITH TRANSPORTATION DNISION - 5. INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED [] 6. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIRED [] pwOl\forme\perrnite%specevnt.r-pp 092091 SENT BY: 3-12-99; 9:51AM; CITY OFTEMECULA~ Je~Sui~e ;; ~/ RECEIVED c TY oF TSM.CuLA JUN 15 1999SpECiAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF TEMECULA TO BE HELD ON PUBUC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, ~,,~:_:: ,~ ENGFNEERtNG DEpARTMEN~iDEWALKS, OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY DATE' HOURS'PRECk'qE LOCATION OF EVENT:~::)LUEH "~'~' , L q ~ ~ H'~,~/i..~o ~ --- ~ :~ PN FEESTo BE CHARGED BY PERMrrTEE: ~ I~' -~'2~ per?-, P,(~z-/'I cl PA'/'-J~' TYPE & NATURE OF VEHICLES, EQUINeiT, ETC.: 80 SOUND SYSTEMS - NUMBER AND AMPLIFICATION RANGE: ( TYPE OF GOODS/SERVICES TO BE SOLD/PROVIDED: 90 VENDORS/NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS: 100 SECURITY PLAN FOR WENT: THE APPLICANT HEREBY STATES THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS ACCURATE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. THE APPUCANT AGREES TO FULLY COMPENSATE THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR ANY DAMAGE TO PUBUC PROPERTY, AS WELL AS SITE TO THE CONDrr N IN ~J~~ED PRIOR TO THE CONDUCT OF TO CLEAN AND OTHERWISE RESTORE THE EVENT THE WENT. PRMIT APPLICANT/AGENT NAME 'FOR CITY STAFF USE ONLY: - 1. APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT: $ / 2. SPECIAL EVENT 3. MAJOR SPECIAL WENT E 4. MEET/CONFER 'WITH TRANSPORTATION DIVISION ;l;iCECERTIFICATE R QUIRED ~, t AIx~LICANTIAGENT SIGNATURE AND DATE I Carrera Promotions Znternational City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive PO Box 9033 Temecula, Ca. 92589 Friday, ,Tune 1], ~,999 Attention: Albert K. Crisp Permit Engineer Dear Mr. Crisp: Enclosed is the special event application with applicable fee's and our proposal for the Temecula Cycling Classic event to held ~Tuly Z5, 1999. We have applied for permits with the District Representative of the United States Cycling Federation. Liability insurance certificates in the name of The City of Temecula will issue by the United 5totes Cycling Federation (USCF). Copy will be sent to your office prior to the event. Course marshals and Traffic control signage to be provided by our organization. Event format: · 1.3 mile course utilizing Business Park Dr. and Single Oak Dr. See attached course map. · One group of riders competing on the course at one time. · All parking and registration will be held at the City of Temecula parking area. · Start time 11:00 AM, Approximate finish time 5:30 PM If you have any questions or concerns, please call as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. 5incarely, //~ Pr~tion InternatiOnal CarPera ~ Ben Cardenos Event promoter EPE TECHNOLOGIES INC. ENGINEERING SKETCH PAD DESIGNED FOR DESIGNED BY BUDGETARy PRICE FOR DESIGN SHOWN BELOW $ DATE ITEM 14 APPROVAL CItY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Substitute Agreements and Securities in Tract No. 24185-2 (Northwesterly of intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road) PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works 2~Albert K. Cdsp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement and Subdivision Monument Agreements, and Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities in Tract No. 24185-2. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities on file. 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developer and sureties. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 24185-2 on June 8, 1999, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Newland Communities, LLC 9404 Genesee Avenue, Suite 230 La Jolla, CA 92037 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of water and sewer systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were the following securities as posted by The American Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. 111 4167 5204 in the amount of $1,435,000 ($703,000, $280,500, and $214,500, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets, drainage, water, and sewer improvements. Bond No. 222 4167 5204 in the amount of $718,000 ($351,500, $140,500, and $107,500, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets, drainage, water, and sewer improvements. 3. Bond No. 111 4167 5212 in the amount of $31,700 to cover subdivision monumentation. r:%agdrpt~99~0713%tr24185-2.subagmt Newland Communities, LLC, has sold this project to the following developer: Woodside Legacy, Inc. c/o Woodside Homes 23121 Antonio Parkway, Suite 120 Rancho Santa Margadta, CA 92688 The new developer has submitted replacement agreements and securities for the contractual work. The substituted securities are bonds posted by Amedcan Motorists Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. 3SM 957 740 00 in the amount of $1,435,000 to cover streets, drainage, and water and sewer improvements for faithful performance. Bond No. 3SM 957 740 00 in the amount of $718,000 to cover streets, drainage, and water and sewer improvements for labor and materials. 3. Bond No. 3SM 957 741 00 in the amount of $31,700 to cover subdivision monumentation The affected public streets, although not completed or accepted are Adelante Street, Valence Court, Tivoli Street, Cadni Court, Corbie Street, and portions of Alcoba Ddve, Sassad Street, Tirano Drive, Savona Court, and Sunny Meadows Ddve. Portions of Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road are already part of the City-Maintained Street System FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Subdivision Agreements (On file) 3. Surety Bonds (On file) r:~agdrptLqg~0713~tr24185-2,subagrnt ~_LIclI41T Y M A P Tract No. 24 185-2 Location MaD NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 15 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City ManagedCity Council (~//~William G, Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Equipment PREPARED BY: (,~Greg Butler, Senior Engineer Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula acquired certain parcels for Rights-Of-Way, slope easements, storm drain easements, rights-of-entry and temporary construction agreements, and traffic signal maintenance easements, all relating to the infrastructure improvements required for the Promenade Mall Project, which were accepted by City Council on August 25, 1998, as Resolution No. 98-85. The underlying fee owner of the affected land and grantor of the several rights in land are The May Department Stores Company The attached documents are for a construction and maintenance easement for a new traffic signal along the easterly side of Ynez Road between the proposed Overland Drive and Winchester Road. This easement needs to be accepted by the City and recorded to facilitate construction activities for the Promenade Mall. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 99- 2. Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Equipment R:~agdrptLq9/0713/maysignal.esrnt 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT THE CiTY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The property owners as shown in Exhibit "B" have granted an easement to the City of Temecula for the purpose of the installation and maintenance of traffic signal equipment on easterly side of Ynez Road between the proposed Overland Drive and Winchester Road on a pdvate street easement. WHEREAS, The legal description for the easement off Ynez Road as set forth and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the grants of easement to construct and maintain that portion of the traffic signal facilities located within the driveway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Maintenance purposes, as offered by The May Department Stores Company, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", for the purposes stated therein, but not for street or other maintenance purposes at this time. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to make minor modifications to the legal descriptions on said documents. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of July 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~agdrpt\99/071 3/maysignal.esmt 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~agdrpt\99/071 3/maysignal.esmt 3 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Carol Fielding Fasano, Esquire The May Department Stores Company 611 Olive Street, Suite 1750 St. Louis, Missouri 63101 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO City of Temecula PoO. Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ABOVE SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE EASEMENT DEED - TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 1. Conveyance of Easement. For a valuable consideration, THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, a New York corporation ("Grantor"), does hereby quitclaim to THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision ("Grantee"), its successors and assigns, for the purposes hereinafter set forth, and for such purposes only, a nonexclusive right-of-way easement under and across the lands of Grantor situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and more particularly shown on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B" (the "Easement Property"). The easement herein described (the "Easement") shall be used by Grantee only to construct, lay, install, operate, use, maintain, alter, repair, replace and inspect and/or remove, from time to time underground traffic signal equipment, wires and conduit to serve the traffic control signalization adjacent to the Easement Property. Grantee shall have the right of reasonable ingress and egress to the Easement Property subject to the uses which Grantor is then making of the applicable surface areas. 2. ExceDtions. Grantor retains the right to use (a) the surface and (b) to the extent such use is not inconsistent with Grantee's use thereof, the subsurface areas of the Easement Property in such manner as Grantor shall deem proper. Grantor specifically excepts and retains the right to pave and use the surface as a roadway and to allow other utility lines to be installed under, across and within the Easement Property, provided such do not interfere with or endanger the installations of Grantee. 3. Protection of Grantor's ImDrovements. In its use of the Easement Property and in the performance of the work which Grantee is authorized to perform within the Easement Property, Grantee shall avoid any damage to, or interference with, other improvements within the Easement Property or in its vicinity. shall: Obliqations of Grantee. In making use of the Easement, Grantee a. Make adequate provisions for the safety and convenience of all persons using the Easement Property or the improvements installed therein by Grantee; b. Replace and restore any areas and improvements disturbed to the condition they were prior to the performance of such work and raise or lower manhole and/or manhole castings to conform to the elevation of the planters, parking area, driveway and road surfaces in which they are located; c. Following initial installations, Grantee shall regularly inspect, and, at all times, maintain its facilities and related equipment in good order and repair and in proper operating condition. 5. Indemnification; Liens. a. Grantee shall indemnify, defend and hold Grantor, its directors, officers, agents and affiliates and any other persons or entities holding an interest in the Easement Property harmless from and against all claims, demands, suits, actions, liabilities, losses, damages, settlements, judgments, costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of, or in connection with, Grantee's use of the Easement Property. b. Grantee shall not permit any claim, lien, or other encumbrance arising from its activities to accrue against or attach to the Easement Property or the interest of Grantor in adjacent lands. 6. Term. The Easement shall terminate and be extinguished upon the cessation of use thereof for more than twelve (12) months. Upon termination and extinguishment of this Easement for any reason whatsoever, Grantee shall execute and deliver to Grantor within 60 days after receipt of written request a good and sufficient recordable quitclaim and/or termination instrument to the Easement Property in question. Should Grantee fail or refuse to deliver to Grantor such a quitclaim and/or termination instrument, written notice of such failure shall be delivered to Grantee and shall be recorded by Grantor, and ten days thereafter serve as notice to Grantee and all claiming through it that this Easement and all rights arising therefrom are terminated. 7. Interference with Business ActivitV. No construction, repair or maintenance activities, other than emergency maintenance and repair, shall be conducted by Grantee on the Easement Property during the months of November or December of any year that Grantor's building on the land adjacent to the Easement Property is open for business without the prior written consent of Grantor in advance of the commencement of any construction, repair or maintenance work upon the Easement Property and Grantee shall coordinate with Grantor the scheduling of such work so as to minimize interference with Grantor's business. 8. Relocation of Easement. Grantee agrees that it will, from time to time, upon request of Grantor, allow the relocation of the Easement to another area upon the following conditions: a. Such relocation must be of such a nature as to permit the proper use and operation of Grantee's facilities and the rendering of satisfactory service thereto; b. Grantee shall be given and there shall have been recorded a written right-of-way easement in form similar to this Easement covering the new location; c. Grantor will cause the relocation work to be performed and the cost of such work to be paid. 9. Title and Other ExceDtions. This Easement is subject to all valid and existing licenses, leases, grants, exceptions, encumbrances, title defects, matters of record, reservations and conditions affecting the project, including the Easement Property and access thereto. 10. Abandoned Facilities. Concurrently with the termination of this Easement or sooner abandonment by Grantee of the facilities in the Easement Property, Grantee shall remove the facilities and restore the Easement Property. 11. AttorneVs' Fees and Costs. In the event of any controversy, claim, or dispute relating to this instrument or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, attorneys' fees and costs, whether or not suit is filed. 12. Binding. This Easement and the covenants contained herein shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties, their legal representatives, successors and assigns. 7~WITNESS ~Ey~.OFj.,.~he parties hereto have executed this instrument as of the day of ~. , 1999. GRANTOR: THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, Title': ~c~/~ ~/!~_ /21-~=,~-~'~~y' ~. GRANTEE: CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision Title: STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) ss. CITY OF ST. LOUIS ) on this ' ~s'~ ~ , 1999, before me, the undersigned, ~ day of ~ a Notary Public in and for t aid City and State, personally appeared R. Dean Wolfe, known to me to be the Executive Vice President of THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, a New York corporation, the corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument, on behalf of the corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within Instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of directors. fITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate first bo ~ written' / ~ ~and for said City an late KELLYLROTH My Commission Expires: (SEAL) STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Notary Public -- Notary Seal STATE OF MISSOURI St. Louis County My Commission Expires January 24, 2002 On this__day of , 19__, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared , known to me to be the person(s) whose name is subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged that executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public in and for said County and State My Commission Expires: (SEAL) 4 ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney R: \CA\TEMECULA\TRAFFIC2. ESM EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 FILED IN BOOK ].92 , PAGES 38 THROUGH z~6 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLy DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO LOT 'B", PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAPS, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE SHOWN AS N 48000'05" E 109.13' PER SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO SAID PARCEL 1 AND SAID LOT "B", NORTH 41o59'55" WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.18 FEET, TO THE INTERSECTION OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLy AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, ALSO BEING ALONG THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO PARCEL 3 AND PARCEL 22 OF SAID PARCEL MAP, FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 62=54'07" EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°54'02- A DISTANCE OF 9.10 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARCEL LINE, NORTH 48°00'05" EAST A DISTANCE OF 98.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41 =59'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 37.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG LAST MENTIONED PARCEL LINE, SOUTH 48°00'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 107.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3,963 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED. H :~HAVV'FHO~ 1 \EASEM E~ 1 \ED\PA RC EL _3 .WPD March 9, 1998 (3:13pm) Page 1 PARCEL 22 0 EXHIBIT "B "' PORTION OF PARCEL 3 PARCEL MAP 28530-1 S41 °59'55"E 37.00' R=35.00' A=I 4° 54' 02" L-'9.10' T=4.58' C::)~'~"'/,' / -,.~ \ / PAR GEL 23 PM 28530-] SCALE: 1" = 40' ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL ~ ' CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council /~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Equipment (j~r:~ Butler, Sen ior Engineer B, Maxwell, Associate Engineer That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99-__. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula acquired certain parcels for Rights-Of-Way, slope easements, storm drain easements, rights-of-entry and temporary construction agreements, and traffic signal maintenance easements, all relating to the infrastructure improvements required for the Promenade Mall Project, which were accepted by City Council on August 25, 1998, as Resolution No. 98-85. The underlying fee owner of the affected land and grantor of the several rights in land are Sears, Roebuck and Company The attached documents are for a construction and maintenance easement for a new traffic signal along the southerly side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margadta Road. This easement needs to be accepted by the City and recorded to facilitate construction activities for the Promenade Mall. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 99- 2. Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Equipment R:~agdrpt\99/071 3/searsignal.esmt 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The property owners as shown in Exhibit "B" have granted an easement to the City of Temecula for the purpose of the installation and maintenance of traffic signal equipment on southerly side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road on a private street easement. WHEREAS, The legal description for the easement off Winchester Road as set forth and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the grants of easement to construct and maintain that portion of the traffic signal facilities located within the driveway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Maintenance purposes, as offered by Sears, Roebuck and Company, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", for the purposes stated therein, but not for street or other maintenance purposes at this time. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to make minor modifications to the legal descriptions on said documents. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of July 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~agdrpt\99/071 3/searsignal.esmt 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula,' California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\agdrptL99/0713/searsignal.esmt 3 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CGi~!::. 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula - City Clerk P O Box 9033. 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO City of Temecula P O Box 9033. 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92589-9033 EASEMENT DEED - TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SEARS, ROEBUCK AND C0. GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for traffic signal equipment, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California. described as: See Attached Exhibits - For Complete Description IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument this /q~['-" day of March , 19 qq sTATE oF ss. COUNTY OF RI-VE. RSlDE} C00g On '?'/ ,,,L,wd,- / q, / ? 9 9 , before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared P. on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature~~.~7, /7~. Real Estate Print Name and Title · SHIRLEY M. MALPEDE ~ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ILLINOIS M Gornmtsslon Expires 05/16/2001 ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA A'rTEST: By: Steven J. Ford, Mayor BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 FILED IN BOOK 192, PAGES 38 THROUGH 46 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT COMMON TO LOT "A", PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 5 OF SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE SHOWN AS N 38°41 '38" W 93.33' PER SAID PARCEL MAP; ' THENCE SOUTH 38°41 '38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.OO FEET ALONG THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO SAID PARCEL 1 AND SAID PARCEL 5 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCENTRIC TO AND DISTANT 25,OO FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED RADIALLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 19O8.OO FEET, SAID INTERSECTION BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID LAST MENTIONED CONCENTRIC CURVE, FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 51°18'23" EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 °17'29" A DISTANCE OF 43.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5; THENCE ALONG LAST MENTIONED LINE, SOUTH 38°41 '38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 67.85 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 293.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE AND LAST MENTIONED LINE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°17'16'' A DISTANCE OF 32.15 FEET; THENCE RADIAL TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE, SOUTH 57°35'38" WEST A DISTANCE OF 43.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO SAID PARCEL 1 AND SAID PARCEL 5, ALSO BEING A POINT IN A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED PARCEL LINE, FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 32°24'22'' WEST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°17'16'' ALONG THE ARC OF LAST MENTIONED CURVE A DISTANCE OF 27.44 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED PARCEL LINE, NORTH 38°41 '38" WEST A DISTANCE OF 68.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 4,212 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. H :\HAVVTHO~ 1 \EASEME- 1 \ED\PARCEL_5.WPD March 9, 1998 (3:16pm) Page 1 SEE EXHIBIT "b", ATTACHED. EXHIBIT "B" PORTION OF PARCEL 5 PARCEL MAP 28530-1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / SCALE: a 58"'0 0 1" = 40' \ CURVE DATA R=1908.00' A=I ° 17' 29" L=43. OO' T=21 . 50' R=293.00' /%=6" 17' 1G" L=32.15' T=I G. 09' R=250.00' A_-----6o17,16,, L=27.44' T=I :.'.']. 7] ' ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO APPROVAL LE CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council /'H,j~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Equipment ~reg Butler, Senior Engineer Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled: SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula acquired certain parcels for Rights-Of-Way, slope easements, storm drain easements, rights-of-entry and temporary construction agreements, and traffic signal maintenance easements, all relating to the infrastructure improvements required for the Promenade Mall Project, which were accepted by City Council on August 25, 1998, as Resolution No. 98-85. The underlying fee owner of the affected land and grantor of the several rights in land are J. C. Penney Properties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation The attached documents are for a construction and maintenance easement for a new traffic signal along the southerly side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road. This easement needs to be accepted by the City and recorded to facilitate construction activities for the Promenade Mall. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 99- 2. Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Equipment R:\agdrpfi99/071 3/pennysignal.esmt 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The property owners as shown in Exhibit "B" have granted an easement to the City of Temecula for the purpose of the installation and maintenance of traffic signal equipment on southerly side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road on a private street easement. WHEREAS, The legal description for the easement off Winchester Road as set forth and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the grants of easement to construct and maintain that portion of the traffic signal facilities located within the driveway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Maintenance purposes, as offered by J. C. Penney Properties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, in substantially thoe form attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", for the purposes stated therein, but not for street or other maintenance purposes at this time. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to make minor modifications to the legal descriptions on said documents. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of July 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R :\agdrpt\99/0713/pennysignal.esmt 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~agdrpfi99/071 3/pennysignal.esmt 3 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODF. 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula - City Clerk P O Box 9033. 43200 Business Park Dr. Tetnecula, CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO City of Temecula P O Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92589-9033 EASEMENT DEED - TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, J. C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INC. ,a Delaware corporation GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for traffic signal equipment, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described as: See Attached Exhibits - For Complete Description IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument this .5 i'k- day of iY'~hc Lt , 19Ciq TEXAS STATE OF g~kM~ } SS. COUNTY OF ~XFt!R~.J~lf~} COT,T,TN On CC~~ ,'~ I ~ qq , before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared person~lyC~own to me (or proved t,, ,he on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person/esy whose name(c)' is/Jxe-subseribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/.~ executed the same in his~J-/~]leir authorized capaeity(jexy, and that by his~ signatureG¢ on the instrument the person(Jr)', or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)' acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Print INC ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: By: Steven J. Ford, Mayor BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney R:\MAXWI!I.W\~AS(;NI.IEQUIP MN'I I)(R' EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 FILED IN BOOK 192, PAGES 38 THROUGH 46 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO LOT "A", PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 4 OF SAID PARCEL MAPS, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE SHOWN AS N 41°52'24" W 272,59' PER SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO SAID PARCEL I AND SAID PARCEL 4, SOUTH 41°52'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.OO FEET, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL TO AND DISTANT 25.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 48°07'36" EAST A DISTANCE OF 43.OO FEET, TO A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO PARCEL 4 AND PARCEL 11 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG LAST MENTIONED PARCEL LINE, SOUTH 41°52'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 96.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48o07'36'' WEST A DISTANCE OF 43.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE PARCEL LINE COMMON TO SAID PARCEL 1 AND SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG LAST MENTIONED PARCEL LINE, NORTH 41 °52'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 96.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 4,128 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B', ATTACHED. EDWARD A. LEWI~ ~, H:~-tAWTHO- 1 \EASEM E~ 1 \ED\PARC EL_4 .WPD March 9, 1998 (3:15pm) Page I EXHIBIT "B" PORTION PARCEL /- / //JTPOB OF PARCEL 4 MAP 28530-1 / / / / / / / / / / / / ,/Z/7 ~ <(/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 2~$30-] SCALE: = 40' ° 07' 36 "W 43.00' \--/ ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council 7k~william G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Ovedand Drive Overcrossing Improvements, Project No. PW95-11 Amendment to Cooperative Agreement No. 8-931 (Resolution No. 96-113) PREPARED BY: Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer- Capital Projects RECOM MEN DATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN "FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-931, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS" Approve an Amendment to the Cooperative Agreement No. 8-931 (Resolution No. 96-113) for Construction of the Ovedand Ddve Overcrossing Improvements (Project No. PW95-11 ) with the State of Califomia, Department of Transportation and authorize the mayor to execute the Amendment. BACKGROUND: On September 10, 1996, a Cooperative Agreement for Construction of the Ovedand Drive Overcrossing Improvements was entered into between the State of California and the City of Temecula. The Cooperative Agreement defines the terms and conditions under which the project will be constructed, financed, and maintained. The project consists of constructing a four-lane overcrossing structure at Ovedand Drive and Interstate Route 15. The original Agreement was written prior to the need to address monument protection and this Amendment to the original Agreement adds the necessary articles to cover this concern. R:~agdrpt~99~0713\PW95-11 Caltrans.amend/swb The Amendment adds the followin.cl articles to the Ori.qinal A.clreement: · Extends the termination date of the odginal Agreement from September 29, 1999 to September 29, 2000. · Provide at no cost to State, survey and mapping services necessary to perpetuate existing land net and alignment monumentation, in accordance with Sections 8771 and 8765 of the Business and Professions Code; Permanently monument the location of all roadway alignments, re-alignments, and right of way acquisitions; All existing monuments to perpetuate existing land net and alignment monumentation which are disturbed or destroyed shall be replaced in kind; And all of the above is to be shown on a Record of Survey filed with the County of Riverside Surveyor. · Provide, install, and/or protect in place monuments used to delineate State's dght of way prior to and during construction, and replace in kind any disturbed or destroyed monuments used to delineate State right of way. · Provide the State Survey and Records Department with a copy of all Records of Survey, filed Corner Records, and field notes required for the preparation of "as-built" plans and perpetuation of existing land net and alignment/right of way monumentation, and all contract records. The Amendment has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impacts are minimal from approving this Amendment to the Cooperative Agreement No. 8-931, Resolution No. 96-113. ATTACHMENT: 1, Resolution No. 99- 2. Amendment R:~agdrpt~99~0713\PW95-11 Caltrans.amend/swb RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN "FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-931, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and a. On September 10, 1996 the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula duly entered into that certain "Cooperative Agreement No. 8-931 between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula for the Construction of the Ovedand Drive Overcrossing Improvements (uAgreement"). b. Since the parties entered into the Agreement, the project will not be constructed pdor to the termination date of the Agreement and the need to address monumentation protection has been added, requiring an Amendment to the Agreement. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "First Amendment to Cooperative Agreement No. 8-931, between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula for Construction of the Ovedand Drive Overcrossing Improvements" dated as of July 13, 1999 by and between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula, and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Coundl of the City of Temecula this 13th day of July, 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R :~agdrpt%99~0713~PW95-11Caltrans.arnend/swb (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) S CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula t at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13h day of July 1999, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: R:~3drpt~99~0713~DW95-11Caltrans.amend/swb 08-Riv-15-6.2/6.3 Overland Drive Construct Overcrossing 08303 - 354601 District Agreement No. 8-931, A/1 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMRNT This AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT, entered into on is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF TEMECULA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY. (1) (2) RECITALS The parties hereto entered into an Agreement (District Agreement No. 8-931), Document No.013630, on September 10, 1996, said Agreement defining the terms and conditions of a project to construct State highway improvements consisting of construction of a four-lane overcrossing structure at Overland Drive and Interstate Route 15 in the City of Temecula, referred to herein as "PROJECT". It has been determined that PROJECT will not be constructed prior to the termination date of said Agreement. Current STATE Agreements typically address monumentation protection. The original Agreement was written prior to the need to address monumentation protection and this Amendment to Agreement adds the necessary articles to cover this concern. IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED: (i) The termination date specified in Section III, Article (22) of the original Agreement shall now be (September 29, 2000, instead of September 29, 1999. (2) (3) District Agreement No. 8-931, A/1 Under Section I (CITY AGREES) add the following Articles (16), (17), and (18). (16) To provide, at no cost to STATE, survey and mapping services necessary to perpetuate existing land net and alignment monumentation, in accordance with Sections 8771 and 8765 of The Business and Professions Code; and to permanently monument the location of all roadway alignments, re-alignments, and right of way acquisitions. All existing monuments to perpetuate existing land net and alignments monumentation which are disturbed or destroyed shall be replaced in kind. All the above to be shown on a Record of Survey filed with the County of Riverside Surveyor. (17) To provide, install, and/or protect in place monuments to delineate STATE's right of way prior to and during construction. All existing monuments to delineate STATE's right of way which are disturbed or destroyed shall be replaced in kind. (18) To provide STATE's Survey and Records Departments a copy of all Records of Survey, filed Corner Records, and field notes required for the preparation of "as- built" plans and perpetuation of existing land net and alignment/right of way monumentation, and all contract records. The other terms and conditions of said Agreement (District Agreement No. 8-931), Document No. 013630, shall remain in full force and effect. NOTE: Article (4) is on signature page. 2 (4) District Agreement No. 8-931, A/1 This Amendment to Agreement is hereby deemed to be part of (District Agreement No. 8-931), Document No. 013630. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation JOSE MEDINA Director of Transportation By: S. LISIEWICZ District Director CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Attorney, Department of Transportation Peter M. Thornson, City Attorney CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: District Budget Manager CERTIFIED AS TO PROCEDURE: Accounting Administrator ITEM CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~:~ CITY MANAGER ~) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council ~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Pre-Excavation Agreement Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project PW97-15 PREPARED BY: Bdan Guillot, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached agreement with the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Indian Reservation ("Pechanga Band") for the cost to monitor grading operations in conjunction with the construction of the Pala Road Bridge, Project No. PW97-15 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: The Pala Road Bridge project was awarded by City Council to Granite Construction Company on February 9, 1999. The project is progressing in accordance with the construction schedule, and the temporary falsework for the bridge deck is now being placed in preparation for constructing the concrete spans. During the planning phase of the project two archaeology studies were performed which identified Native American cultural resources that exist at and around the construction site. Items discovered during the site investigations were relocated, however the Pechanga Cultural Committee was concerned that additional artifacts may exist at the project site, and therefore requested additional monitoring during construction. The City of Temecula had previously committed to pay for cultural resources grading observation, and an agreement was executed by the City Manager for the not to exceed amount of $25,000.00. The agreement set forth payment based on an hourly rate and required the City to deposit the full amount of the agreement with the Pechanga Band, and thereafter they paid the monitors directly. At this stage of the project the $25,000.00 is exhausted and the Pechanga Band is requesting additional monies to continue monitoring activities. Based on the remaining construction schedule, construction activities identified for monitoring total approximately 68 days of work, which amounts to an estimated additional $35,000.00 expense. The Pechanga Band is committed to the preservation of its Luiseno culture. They are concerned about the proper treatment of Native American human remains and sacred items, and the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luiseno village sites and cultural items that may be disturbed by construction activities. Included with this report is a letter from California Indian Legal Services, Attorneys for the Pechanga Band, which identifies the concerns of the Indians in detail. R:~agdrpt\99~071 3~pechangaagrmt/ajp 1 FISCAL IMPACT: The Pala Road Bridge Capital Improvement Project is funded by Federal Highway Administration Funds/Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Funds, Federal Highway Bddge Replacement and Rehabilitation Funds, Capital Project Reserves and Developer Impact Fees. Adequate funds are available for the subject monitoring agreement in the amount of $35,000.00 in Account No. 210-165-631-5801. Expense for monitoring activities under the previous agreement executed by the City Manager is $25,000.00 bringing the total for monitoring activities with this agreement to $60,000.00. ATTACHMENTS: Pre-excavation Agreement Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project PW97-15. Letter from California Indian Legal Services, Attorneys for the Pechanga Band dated June 30, 1999. R :\agdrptL.q9\0713\pechangaagrmt/ajp 2 PRE-EXCAVATION AGREEMENT Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project Project No. PW 97-15 This pre-excavation Agreement is executed by City of Temecula ("City"), a municipality of the State of California, in connection with the Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project, PW 97-15 in the City of Temecula ("Project"), and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians CPechanga Band"). The Riverside County Coroner' s Office will be provided a copy of this Agreement. The purpose of this Agreement is to formalize a procedure for the treatment of Native American human remains and ceremonial and cultural items, in the event that any are found in conjunction with the development of the Project. This Agreement is effective as of March 1, 1999. I. MOST LIKELY DESCENDANT It is understood by both parties to this Agreement that the determination of Most Likely Descendant, pursuant to California Pub. Res. Code § 5097.98, is to be made by the Native American Heritage Commission upon notification of the discovery of human remains of Native American origin at the Project site. Until that time, neither the Pechanga Band nor City guarantees that the Pechanga Band, or one of its members, will be so named. However, both parties agree that their good faith belief is that when and if such human remains are discovered in the Project site, given the location of the site and the history and prehistory of the area, Chairman Mark Macarro of the Pechanga Band will be named Most Likely Descendant. Should it be determined by the Native American Heritage Commission that a member of an Indian Tribe other than the Pechanga Band is the Most Likely Descendant, the provisions of this Agreement relating to the treatment of Native American remains shall be null and void in their entirety; however, in such an event, the provisions of Addendum 1 to this Agreement, relating to Cultural Resource Grading Observation, which is fully severable, shall continue in full force and effect. II. CULTURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE The Pechanga Band has, pursuant to its Constitution and Bylaws, appointed a Cultural Resources Committee as duly authorized agents of the Band, to represent the Pechanga Band as described below, along with the Most Likely Descendant. The Cultural Resources Committee may recommend treatment, sealing or capping of discovered burial sites or reburial sites in order to minimize the chances of future disturbances of the remains or artifacts. III. COORDINATION WITH COUNTY CORONER'S OFFICE The City shall immediately contact the County Coroner's Office and the Cultural Resources Committee in the event that any human remains are discovered during implementation of the Project. The Cultural Resources Committee and the Most Likely Descendant shall coordinate with the County Coroner's Office to ensure that notification as required by law is provided to the Native American Heritage Commission. The Cultural Resources Committee and Most Likely Descendant shall complete their inspection and make their recommendations to the City as to disposition of human remains and grave goods, with appropriate dignity, within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notification from either the City or the Native American Heritage Commission, as required by Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resource Code. Reinterment of human remains shall be accomplished in compliance with Public Resource Code §§ 5097.98(a) and 5097.98(b). Both parties agree to discuss in good faith to determine what constitutes "appropriate dignity" as used in Public Resource Code § 5097.98(b). r:\pylex, palabridgeagmt/ajp IV. TREATMENT OF HUMAN REMAINS AND CEREMONIAL CULTURAL ITEMS Treatment of human remains and ceremonial and cultural items will reflect the traditional religious beliefs and practices of the most likely descended Native Americans, namely the Pechanga Band, as required by federal and state laws which may apply, namely: California Public Resource Code §8 5097.98; 5097.98(c); 5097.992; California Health and Safety Code § 7050.5(c); California Government Code § 6254; the Native American Graves. Protection and Repatriation Act of 1991, 25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.; the Native American Free Practice of Religion Act of 1991, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 1996, et ~eq.; Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); the First Amendment to the United States Constitution; and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resource Code § 21000 et seq., and applicable regulations. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to make any of the above-referenced laws applicable where such laws would otherwise be inapplicable. The Pechanga Band is aware that permission from the property owner for on-site reburial is required by law. The most likely descendants, as represented by the Cultural Resources Committee, may wish to rebury the human remains and ceremonial and cultural items, if any are discovered, on or near the site of their discovery, in an area least likely to undergo subsurface disturbance over a prolonged period of time. City agrees to select a reburial site on City's property within the Project site in consultation with the Cultural Committee. The term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones, because Luiseno tradition calls for the ceremonial burning of human remains and animals. Ashes and other remnants of these burning ceremonies are to be treated in the same manner as bones or bone fragments that remain intact. City agrees to give all Native American artifacts which may be found on the project site, other than human remains, to the Cultural Resource Committee of the Pechanga Band for appropriate treatment and disposal unless otherwise ordered by an agency or court with lawful jurisdiction over the project. City agrees to waive any and all claims to ownership of all Native American artifacts which may be found on the project site in favor of the Pechanga Band. V. NON-DISCLOSURE OF LOCATION OF REBURIALS It is understood by both parties to this Agreement that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains will not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The County Coroner' s Office will be asked to withhold public disclosure of information related to such reburial pursuant to the specific exemption set forth at subsection (r) of Government Code Section 6254. VI. WORK STATEMENT FOR OBSERVATION The Description of work for observers of the grading operation at the development site is attached hereto as Addendum 1, and incorporated herein by reference. Addendum 1 specifies the geographical area over which the observation shall be conducted, the size of the observation crew, and provisions for compensation of the tribal monitors. VII. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of all the parties. r:\pyle\palabrldgeagmt/ajp VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Nothing in this Agreement shall excuse City from its obligations under any applicable state or federal environmental statute, including but not limited to the California Environmental Quality Act CCEQA"). The Pechanga Band in no way indemnifies nor guarantees City in any of City' s legal obligations. IX. SEVERABILITY Should any part of this Agreement be found by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction to be, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Steven J. Ford, Mayor TEMECULA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION ("PECHANGA BAND") By: Mark Macarro, Spokesman date By: Raymond Basquez, Sr. Cultural Committee Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM date Peter M. Thornson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk r:\pyle\palabridgeagmt/ajp ADDENDUM1 Cultural Resource Gradin,, Observation Specifications: A pre-grading conference shall be held to clarify monitoring specifications with the grading contractor and the Grading Inspector of the jurisdiction in which the project site is located. The Consultant/Coordinator of the Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee shall be invited to participate in this conference. Archaeological observation shall consist of a qualified archaeologist present during all grading activities to identify and/or ascertain the significance of any subsurface cultural resources or to aid in the avoidance of sensitive areas. Given the nature and sensitivity of these archaeological sites, members of the Pechanga Band will be retained as monitors during grading activities. While it is unlikely, the monitors would be empowered to stop or relocate excavation activities for short periods of time to conduct further, controlled excavation for evaluation of significance. Surface or subsurface artifacts of significance are also collected and mapped during this operation. Grading observation shall encompass the area designated in the attached map, labeled Exhibit A and incorporated by reference into this Agreement. For purposes of determining crew sizes, a written grading schedule will be submitted to the Cultural Resources Committee consultant in writing one day in advance. Proiect Crew Sizes: The Parties to this Agreement project the need for a tribal monitoring crew consisting of two (2) persons, who may be either monitors or knowledgeable trainees, as supplied by the Pechanga Band. If work at two locations is necessary, additional monitors or trainees may be required, or the crew may be split so as to work at both locations at once. The Consultant/Coordinator will work as needed, and will be paid on an hourly basis for all onsite work. If human remains are found, coordinating the reburial of those remains and cultural and ceremonial items will be conducted through the Cultural Resources Committee and Most Likely Descendant. Compensation: The Pechanga Band shall hire the tribal monitoring crew for this Project and shall be responsible for coordinating their activities on this Project. The Pechanga Band recognizes that dangerous conditions can exist on the work site, particularly during grading operations, and agrees to assume responsibility for the safety of the tribal monitoring crew while on the Project site. City shall pay to the Pechanga Band the costs of the tribal monitoring crew at the rates set forth in this Addendum. Native American monitoring activities will be paid at the following rates: Monitors will be paid $35.00 (thirty-five dollars) per hour and Monitor Trainees at $25.00 (twenty-five dollars) per hour. The Consultant/Coordinator shall be paid at a rate of $40.00 (forty dollars) per hour. The hourly rate of compensation paid to the tribal monitors shall be adjusted for inflation based on 1999 dollars. The adjustment, if any, shall be calculated upon the basis of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Revised Consumer Price Index and shall be made only once a year. A minimum half day charge ("show up" time) will be charged to City for any unannounced work stoppages for Native American monitors which are not due to actions of the Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee or tribal monitors. r:\pyle\palabridgeagmt/ajp The City shall deposit the sum of $35,000 with the Pechanga Band for payment of estimated costs of the tribal monitors for this project. Pechanga Band shall return the unused portions of the deposit to the City, without interest. This agreement is unique to the Project only, and does not set a precedent for other projects. r:\pyle\palabridgeagmt/ajp CALIFORNIA INDIAN LEGAL SERVICES 609 SOUTH ESCONDIDO BOULEVARD ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025 (760) 746-8941 TELECOPIER (760) 746-1815 DIRECTING ATTORNEY LISA C. OSHIRO STAFF A TTOR.'VE YS LA~.VRENCE R. STIDHAM DENISE M. DOUGLAS CHARMAINE L. HUNTTING JOSEPHANIE R. ACKMAN LAURA MIRANDA JOANNE WILLIS NEWTON RECEIVED jUL i~ .g 1999 CITY OF TE'jECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT June 30, 1999 Mr. William Hughes Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Continued Native American monitoring at the Pala Road Bridge construction site. Dear Mr. Hughes: We are submitting this request, on behalf of our client the Pechanga Band of Luise~o Indians (hereinafter the "Pechanga Band"), for continued Native American monitoring during the construction of the new Pala Road Bridge. The Pechanga Band is not opposed to construction of the Pala Road Bridge. The Band's primary concerns stem from the project's impacts on Native American cultural resources. The Pechanga Band is concerned about the proper and lawful treatment of Native American human remains and sacred items, and the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luisefio village sites and cultural items, which have been and will be displaced by ground- disturbing ~vork on the project. BACKGROUND Native American monitors representing the Pechanga Band have been monitoring the construction of the Pala Road Bridge since approximately Tuesday, March 2, 1999. On February 25, 1999, Mr. William Hughes sent a letter to Pechanga Tribal Spokesman, Mark Macafro, stating that at a bridge construction kick-off meeting, on February 24, 1999, there was a clear recollection among some people involved in early meetings that there was a desire to have the Pechanga Band monitor the grading activities of the bridge construction. Mr. Hughes, thereafter, requested Mr. Macarro's assistance with implementing a plan for Native American monitors to be present during excavation activities related to the construction of the bridge. Mr. Hughes also indicated in that letter that "City representatives assured the (Tribal) Council that the City would fund the cost of such monitoring." From that point on, the Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee, a committee elected by Pechanga Tribal members for the specific purpose of protecting Luisefio cultural resources, was charged with organizing the bridge monitoring on behalf of the Tribe. On March 12, 1999 a Pre-Excavation Agreement, which set-out the terms for monitoring rcpoll lo city rcq addtl monitoring v. pd Letter to Mr. William Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula Re: Request for continued Native American monitoring at the Pala Road Bridge construction site June 30, 1999 - p. 2 and treatment of Native American remains and cultural items, was entered into by Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager, on behalf of the City of Temecula and Mark Macarro, on behalf of the Pechanga Band. Due to the time constraints presented by the construction start date of March 2nd, it was vital to enter into the monitoring agreement immediately rather than waiting to appear in front of the Temecula City Council. At that time, the City did not have a detailed construction schedule from the contractor, so it was not possible to determine the actual extent of monitoring necessary for the project. Additionally, since the City Manager is only allowed to enter into agreements on behalf of the City for no more than $25,000, the parties decided that the Pre-Excavation Agreement would have a cap of $25,000 on monitoring costs, and that if the contract limit exceeded the City Manager's approval limit, a subsequent agreement would be prepared for City Council approval (Memo from W. Hughes to S. Nelson dated March 11, 1999). As of June 25, 1999, $24,987.69 of the $25,000 allocated for Native American monitors has been expended. The Band is now requesting the Temecula City Council to approve a subsequent agreement for the balance of monitoring necessary during the construction of the Pala Road Bridge. LUISEF~O CULTURAL RESOURCES AT THE PALA ROAD BRIDGE Archaeological surveys of the bridge construction area were prepared by the Archaeological Research Unit at UC Riverside (hereinafter "ARU") for RANPAC Engineering in February of 1992 and by Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. (hereina~er "Ogden") for the County of Riverside in January of 1997. The ARU survey was to determine whether there were any archaeological resources present in the area that would potentially be impacted by construction of the Pala Road Bridge, whereas the Ogden survey was an extended survey on a specific archaeological site, CA-RIV 4707, which was uncovered during the ARU survey. The ARU survey revealed both the archaeological site, CA-RIV 4707, and current usage of natural resources by Native Americans in the project area. Site 4707 is in the northwest portion of the project area. Surveys revealed that within the site there was one area of darkened, possibly midden, soil as well as many archaeological items (UCR ARU Report #1173, pg. 10). In addition to documenting the presence of this site, field surveys coupled with the geography of the land, indicated that there was a high potential for buried and/or hidden sites within the Pala Road Bridge project area (UCR ARU Report #1173, pg. 10). The ARU survey urged that because of the historical importance of this region to early California history, care should be taken to consider any historical component to this site, CA- RIV 4707 (UCR ARU Report #1173, pg. 14). The Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee believes that this site has the potential to fill in pieces of Temecula Valley history as it represents a transitional period evidenced by the cultural items revealed at this site. Cultural items found at the site can be classified into two groups: Pre-historic (pre-contact) and historic. Since both pre- historic and historic items have been uncovered at this site, it has the potential to add an important piece to the history of the life and economic patterns of the Luise~o culture as it transitioned from its traditional ways to a new modern way of life influenced by contact. Moreover, it is extremely important to note that the bridge project area is surrounded by many very important Luisefio sites. The nearest recorded archaeological site lies on the northem report.to city req addtl monitonng wpd Letter to Mr. William Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula Re: Request for continued Native American monitoring at the Pala Road Bridge construction site June 30, 1999 - p. 3 bank of Temecula Creek about 1/4 mile east of the project boundary. The site CA-RIV 3410 was recorded in 1988 by Drover and Jackson and appears to be an extensive deposit of Indian and possibly European artifacts stretching for more than V2 mile along the bank of the creek (UCR ARU Report #1173, pg. 8). The next nearest site is CA-RIV 1071 recorded in 1976 by Eastvoid and located on the west side of Pala Road about V2 mile south of the Pala Bridge (UCR ARU Report #1173, pg. 8). Most importantly, "about 3/4 mile west of the project area lies the highly significant Murrieta Canyon Archaeological Area" (UCR ARU Report #1173, pg. 9), which is believed by the Pechanga Band to be a sacred site as Luise~o creation stories so indicate. This area is known by the Pechanga Band as the Temeku Village site and the site has been nominated to the national Register of Historic Places. This site is one of the largest and most significant Luise~o sites as it was a Mecca for the Luise~o people. ACTIVITIES WHICH REQUIRE NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORS The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Pala Road Bridge contained no mitigation measures to address the destruction of the archaeological site CA-RIV 4707, the Luisefio gathering area, or any sites/cultural items uncovered during construction of the bridge. Mitigation measures were not implemented because the sites and the project area itself were deemed "unimportant/insignificant" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and ineligible for listing on the National Register of Historical Properties (NRHP) as a traditional cultural properties. The Band does not presently wish to address the analysis of the Luisefio sites under the law, but the Pechanga Band does believe that those sites are, nevertheless, important and significant, not only to the Luisefio people, but to all people who have an interest in preserving and documenting the rich history of the Temecula Valley. Moreover, the expertise of the local Tribal elders -- those with the most historical knowledge of the site and the most intimate understanding of what impacts are significant -- is dispositive on the issue of significant impacts. Because of the proximity of this project to many important registered Luise~o sites, the Pechanga Band feels that allowing Native American monitors to observe all ground-disturbing activity is a mitigation measure ~vhich would ensure that the City is not only respecting the Band's heritage and its right as a sovereign nation to preserve and protect its culture, but the monitoring would ensure that the City is complying with applicable state and federal laws governing the protection and preservation of Native American Cultural resources. In Environmental Protection Information Center v. Johnson (1985) 170 Cal.App. 3d 604, 613, both the trial court and later the court of appeal issued stays preventing logging in an area containing archaeological resources. The loss of one's heritage, patrimony, and ancestral relics is an irreparable harm implicitly recognized by the Legislature in criminal statutes (e.g., Penal Code Section 622 Y2) as well as civil (e.g., Public Resources Code Section 5097 et. seq.; Pub. Res. Code Sec. 5052.1; Health and Safety Code sec. 7000 et. Seq.). Furthermore. Congress has recognized this in a multitude of federal statutes (e.g., The National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470; the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 470aa; the Antiquities Act, 16 U.S.C. 431; and others). The loss ofone's past is permanent and irremediable. This view is vehemently reDon to city req addtl monitoring x~ pd Letter to Mr. William Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula Re: Request for continued Native American monitoring at the Pala Road Bridge construction site June 30, 1999 - p. 4 supported by the Pechanga Band. Since bridge construction activities began, the presence of Native American monitors has revealed a total of approximately 62 artifacts, including historic material such as broken ceramic pottery and glass. Traditional items such a broken manos, hide scrapers, a chopper, hammerstones, and metate fragments have also been uncovered. It is important to note that broken or "killed" metates indicate that sacred ceremonial activities may have taken place in the project area. No Native American remains were uncovered. but most of the area which is believed to encompass the Luisefio site CA-RIV 4707 has not been subject to extensive groundbreaking activity thus far. Much of the construction activity yet to be performed will be within the 4707 site area, the most important area in which to have the Native American monitors. The main concern of the Pechanga Band is monitoring sterile soil displacing activities. These include not only surface soils, but all previously undisturbed soils regardless of the depth. The Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee believes that not all potentially significant components at this project area have been located. The Committee believes that there is still the potential that Luisefio cultural items will be revealed in any part of the bridge project area, but has identified three (3) specific important areas at the construction site, which have yet to be disturbed: 1 ) Under old Pala Road bridge and under the current Pala Road is an area which the Committee believes to contain subsurface deposits. Excavation for utilities and rip-rap installation have yet to take place in those areas. 2) The south side of the stream bed where the slope of the ground is flat. Since vegetation was dense during walk-over surveys of this area a completely accurate assessment of this area was not possible. Riprap excavation and excavation for utilities have yet to occur in this area. 3) The heart of CA-RIV 4707, presently the location of the construction trailer and parking lot, is a major area yet to be subjected to construction activities. Accordingly, the Band is requesting Native American monitors during activities which entail excavation or disturbance of sterile soils in those sensitive areas. The Band, in conjunction with Granite Construction, has complied a list of the requested activities that you will find attached and highlighted in Appendix A. The list of construction activities include utility and water line excavation at depths which have not been previously disturbed, riprap excavation at depths of 28 feet and various water appurtenances. EXPENSE FOR NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORS The construction activities identified for monitoring total approximately 68 days of work. Two monitors: one lead monitor ($35.00/hr.) and a monitor ($25.00/hr) working for 68 days totals approximately $32,640. Because of weather concerns and additional unforeseeable conditions that could increase activity and project time, we are requesting that the City of Temecula enter into a Pre-Excavation Agreement, similar to the previous agreement, which would place a cap of $35,000 on monitoring expenses. The Pechanga Band is committed to the preservation of its Luise~o culture. Their report to city req addtl monitonng wpd Letter to Mr. William Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula Re: Request Ii3r continued Native American monitoring at the Pala Road Bridge construction site June 30, 1999 - p. 5 convictions are strong and they rise to these duties and responsibilities that have been bestowed upon them by their elders. The relationship between the Pechanga Band and the City of Temecula on this Pala Bridge Project is unprecedented. It has been a joint effort, which the Band would like to continue through completion of the bridge and beyond. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter, and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 746-8941, ext. 110 or Benny Masiel, Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee Project Coordinator at (909) 308-9295. Sincerely, CALIFORNIA INDIAN LEGAL SERVICES Laura Y. Miranda Attorneys for the Pechanga Band report to city req addll monltzr:'-g wpd APPENDIX A ACT ID 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1420 1430 1440 1500 1520 1540 1590 1600 Activity Description MOBILIZATION INSTALL RIPAIRAN FENCING CLEAR TEMECULA CREEK DEWATERING DEVELOP WATER SUPPLY INSTALL K-RAIL OVEREXCAVATION / RECOMPACTION EXCAVATE ABUTMENTS EXCAVATE/DEWATER PIER 2 DRIVE ABUT. 1 PILING (17) DRIVE ABUT. 3 PILING ABUT. 1 FOOTING/WALL DRIVE PIER 2 PILING ABUT. 3 FTG. / WALL PIER 2 FTG. / WALL BACKFILL PIER 2 BACKFILL ABUT. 3 ERECT FALSEWORK FORM SOFFIT/OUTSIDES STEM REBAR/PT TUBES FORM STEMS POUR STEMS STRIP STEMS INSTALL UTILITY CONDUITS (BRIDGE) LOST DECK/UTILITIES SANDBLAST STEMS/DECK REBAR SET/RUN BIDWELL POUR DECK CURE DECK PRESTRESS DECK PT ANCHORS/BACKWALLS/CASINGS STRIP FALSEWORK/SOFFIT BACKFILL/GRADE APPROACHES R/F/P BARRIER RAILING JOINT SEAL TUBULAR HANDRAILING BRIDGE WORK COMPLETE CUT TO FILL CREEK BED IMPORT BORROW 30" CML&C 16" TAR WRAPPED PIPE 16" POTABLE WATER RIPRAP EXCAVATION WATER APPERTENANCES RIPRAP/FILTER FAB./#2 BACKING/ 16" RECLAIMED WATER CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SILL WATER TESTING 18" RCP OD 10d 2d 9d 40d 2d ld 2d ld 3d 4d 3d 12d 5d 12d 13d 3d 2d 20d 10d 15d 15d ld 5d 10d 15d 10d 2d ld 6d 4d 5d 15d 2d 5d 2d 3d 0 3d 14d 11d 6d 8d 9d 15d 16d 12d 7d 9d 2d RD ES EF LS 0 01MAR99 15MAR99 01MAR99 0 02MAR99 03MAR99 02MAR99 0 01MAR99 12MAR99 01MAR99 6d 12MAR99 30JUN99 12MAR99 0 15MAR99 16MAR99 15MAR99 0 06APR99 06APR99 06APR99 0 12MAR99 15MAR99 12MAR99 0* 02APR99 06APR99 02APR99 0 30MAR99 02APR99 30MAR99 0 13APR99 20APR99 13APR99 0 05MAY99 07MAY99 05MAY99 0 21APR99 13MAY99 21APR99 0 21APR99 04MAY99 21APR99 0 13MAY99 04JUN99 13MAY99 0 06MAY99 10JUN99 06MAY99 0 11JUN99 15JUN99 11JUN99 0 03JUN99 03JUN99 03JUN99 19d 21JUN99 20JUL99 21JUN99 10d 14JUL99 27JUL99 14JUL99 15d 21JUL99 10AUG99 21JUL99 15d 04AUG99 24AUG99 04AUG99 l d 26AUG99 26AUG99 26AUG99 5d 27AUG99 02SEP99 27AUG99 10d 03SEP99 17SEP99 03SEP99 15d 20SEP99 08OCT99 20SEP99 10d 04OCT99 15OCT99 04OCT99 2d 18OCT99 19OCT99 18OCT99 lcl 20OCT99 20OCT99 20OCT99 6cl 21OCT99 28OCT99 21OCT99 4d 29OCT99 03NOV99 29OCT99 5d 04NOV99 10NOV99 05NOV99 15d 04NOV99 29NOV99 04NOV99 2d 12NOV99 15NOV99 15NOV99 5d 16NOV99 22NOV99 17NOV99 2d 23NOV99 24NOV99 24NOV99 3d 18NOV99 22NOV99 23NOV99 0 29NOV99 0 16MAR99 18MAR99 16MAR99 0 * 24MAR99 19APR99 24MAR99 3d 16JUN99 30JUN99 16JUN99 6d 03SEP99 13SEP99 21OCT99 8d 26JUL99 04AUG99 21SEP99 5d 26MAY99 29JUN99 26MAY99 15d 05AUG99 25AUG99 08OCT99 10d 28MAY99 07JUL99 28MAY99 16d 24JUN99 23JUL99 24JUN99 7d 23JUN99 01JUL99 24APR00 9d 14SEP99 24SEP99 29OCT99 2d 05AUG99 06AUG99 01OCT99 ACT ID 1610 1620 1630 1640 1660 1670 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 2110 Activity Description OD RD ES EF LS FORM/PLACE MINOR CONC. STR. 15d 15d IMPORT BORROW TO FINISH GRADE 8d 8d SUBGRADE PREP/FINISH PARKWAYS 4d 4d LAY/COMPACT/FINISH BASE 6d 6d CONCRETE CURB WORK ld ld ASPHALT CONCRETE 3d 3d SIDEWALK/RAMPS/DRIVES 8d 8d TRAFFIC SWITCH TO NEW BRIDGE ld ld FINISH STAGE ONE 0 0 AC/CURBS/SW REMOVALS 5d 5d BACKFILL ABUT. 1 2d 0 F/R APPROACH SLABS 3d 3d RETAINING WALL FOOTING ld ld RELOCATE FIBER OPTIC LINE 25d 0 ROAD EXC. TO EMBANKMENT 2d 2d RIPRAP EXC. TO EMBANKMENT 7d 7d PLACE FILTER FABRIC 6d 6d DIG/LAY 16" CML&C 5d 5d #2 GRAVEL BLANKET 2cl 2d INSTALL RIPRAP 2d 2d CONCRETE RIPRAP 2d 2d BACKFILL 16" CML&C 3d 3d INSULATED TEST CONNECTION 3d 3d DIL/B 12" CML&C 5d 5d INSULATED TEST CONNECTION 3d 3d INSTALL 2" AVA 3d 3d COMPACTED FILL 2d 2d 18" RCP 2d 2d INSTALL 6" BLOW OFF ASSYM. 3d 3d 24" RCP 2d 2d D/L/B SUPER FIRE HYDRANTS 3d 3d WATER TESTING 2d6h 2d6h ABANDON 18" POTABLE WATER LINE 4d 4d DEMO EXISTING BRIDGE 14d 14d SUBGRADE/FINISHING 2d 2d MACHINE PLACE CURB 2d 2d FORMED CURB ld ld LAY/COMPACT BASE ld ld TRAFFIC SIGNAL/STREET LIGHTS 20d 20d FINISH BASE ld ld ASPHALT CONCRETE ld ld SW/ RAMPS/ DRIVES 3d 3d FOG SEAL AC 3d 3d STRIPING SUB WORK 10d 10d SIGNING SUB WORK 10d 10d JOB CLEAN-UP 5d 5d PUNCH LIST ld ld FINAL INSPECTION 2d 2d STAGE 2 COMPLETE 0 0 09AUG99 27AUG99 05OCT99 30AUG99 09SEP99 26OCT99 10SEP99 15SEP99 05NOV99 10NOV99 18NOV99 12NOV99 19NOV99 19NOV99 22NOV99 22NOV99 24NOV99 23NOV99 17NOV99 30NOV99 21APR00 30NOV99 30NOV99 30NOV99 30NOV99 01DEC99 07DEC99 24APR00 13MAY99 14MAY99 13MAY99 16NOV99 18NOV99 17NOV99 01DEC99 01DEC99 01DEC99 12APR99 12MAY99 12APR99 08DEC99 09DEC99 01 MAY00 07DEC99 15DEC99 07DEC99 16DEC99 23DEC99 16DEC99 27DEC99 03JAN00 27DEC99 27DEC99 28DEC99 25APR00 29DEC99 30DEC99 27APR00 03JAN00 04JAN00 01 MAY00 04JAN00 06JAN00 04JAN00 07JAN00 11 JAN00 07JAN00 12JAN00 18JAN00 12JAN00 19JAN00 21 JAN00 19JAN00 24JAN00 26JAN00 24JAN00 24JAN00 25JAN00 25APR00 26JAN00 27JAN00 27APR00 27JAN00 01 FEB00 27JAN00 28JAN00 01FEB00 01MAY00 02FEB00 04FEB00 02FEB00 07FEB00 09FEB00 07FEB00 09FEB00 15FEB00 09FEB00 23FEB00 14MAR00 23FEB00 14MAR00 16MAR00 14MAR00 16MAR00 20MAR00 31MAR00 20MAR00 21 MAR00 04APR00 16MAR00 17MAR00 16MAR00 21MAR00 18APR00 05APR00 17MAR00 20MAR00 17MAR00 20MAR00 21MAR00 20MAR00 21MAR00 24MAR00 28APR00 21MAR00 24MAR00 21MAR00 24MAR00 07APR00 24MAR00 07APR00 21APR00 07APR00 21APR00 28APR00 21APR00 28APR00 01MAY00 28APR00 01 MAY00 03MAY00 01 MAY00 03MAY00 ITEM 2O APPROVAL _~/~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC[ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement with Riverside County Transportation Department for Weekend Traffic Control at I-15 and Hwy 79 South RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve an amendment to an existing agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County extending California Highway Patrol (CHP) traffic control services for weekend traffic control at 1-15 and Hwy. 79 South in an amount not to exceed $10,500.00, and authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment. BACKGROUND: Last fall City Council requested that staff investigate additional traffic control by the CHP on Saturday and Sundays at 1-15/Hwy. 79 South during the construction of the interchange modifications. On November 10, 1998 City Council entered into a joint funding agreement with Riverside County Transportation Department to share costs for weekend traffic control from November 1998 through March 31, 1999 in an amount of $17,000.00. Because of delays during construction additional CHP traffic control services were required from April 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. The project is now complete and the traffic signals are now in operation. The attached amendment will authorize payment of an additional $10,500.00 for the City's share of the additional weekend services. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the FY98-99 Public Works Traffic Division, Other Outside Services line item for the extended traffic control services. R:~agdrpt\99~071 3\handwaveramend/ajp 1 FIRST, AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL ON PORTIONS OF HIGHWAY 79S BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF TEMECULA THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 1, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula, a Municipal Corporation ("City") and County of Riverside (County). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: On, November 10, 1998 the City and the County of Riverside entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Cooperative Agreement for Reimbursement for Traffic Control on Portions of Highway 79S "("Agreement"). b. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 2 a. of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "TERM This Agreement shall commence on November 1, 1998 and services shall be extended to June 30, 1999. PAYMENT Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed Ten Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($10,500.00) and shall be paid pursuant to Section 2 d. of the Agreement. 4. This First Amendment, hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R: \pyle\countytraffamendajp Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Director of Transportation P.O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Chairman Board of Supervisors Deputy Clerk of the Board Deputy County Counsel R: \pyle\eountytraffamendajp ITEM 21 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Z'~.~M/illiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Signal and Median Modification at Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive, Project No. PW99-09 PREPARED BY: ~)C,'Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Project Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the modification of the traffic signal and median islands at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive, Project No. PW99-09. BACKGROUND: The City Council has appropriated funds for the proposed modification at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive as part of the Short-Term City-Wide Traffic Improvement Program. This project will include the relocation of signal poles, installation of new handicap ramps, modification of median islands and the relocation of the crosswalk to the west side of the intersection. Also, the intersection will be re-striped to allow for an additional left turn lane from Town Center Drive to eastbound Rancho California Road. These modifications will expedite turning movements at the intersection and also allow for a longer green time for Rancho California Road traffic. The Public Works Department has prepared the plans, specifications, and contract documents and the project is now ready to be advertised for construction bids. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $40,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded through the Public Works Department Traffic Improvement Fund. These funds have been appropriated in Acco'unt No. 001-164-602-5412 for Project No. PW99-09. r:~,agdrpt\99~0713~N99-09.bidfsmc VIA PROJECT SITE .( TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE PROJECT NO. PW99-09 RE-STRIPING LU NEW RAMP (TYP.) NEW CROSSWALK REMOVE MEDIAN PORTION O RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD NEW RAMP TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE PROJECT NO. PW99-09 ITEM 22 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manage~City Council ),J.J't William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Award of Construction Contract for the Street Name Sign Replacement Project No. PW98-18 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects Hasib Baha, Assistant Engineer- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award construction contract for the Street Name Sign Replacement Project No. PW98-18 to J.K. Weigle Engineering Contract in the amount of $40,611.16 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $4,061.11 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On February 9, 1999 the City Council authorized staff to solicit public bids for the Street Name Sign Replacement project. There are a number of wooden street name signs in Los Ranchitos area that are deteriorating and are in need of replacement. This project will provide for the replacement of all existing wooden street name signs with new polyurethane plastic signs with better reflectivity and durability within the Los Ranchitos Area as shown on Exhibit "A". A total of 51 signs will be replaced. Four (4) bids were publicly opened on June 17, 1999 and the results for the bid are as follows: 1. J.K. Weigle Engineering Contractor ..............................................................$ 40,611.16 2. TDS Engineering ............................................................................................$ 48,042.00 3. Chrisp Company ............................................................................................$ 58, 140.00 4. Super Seal & Stripe .......................................................................................$ 75,225.00 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found that J.K. Weigle Engineering Contractor to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. J.K. Weigle Engineering Contractor has satisfactorily completed other projects for other agencies in the past. The specifications allow forty-five (45) working days for the completion of this project. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineers office. R:'agdrpt~99~713~pw98-18.awd/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project funded by Capital Improvement Reserves. These funds have been proposed in the Street Name Sign Replacement Project in the FY2000-04 Capital Improvement Program being considered by the City Council later this evening, ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibit "A", Proposed Sign Locations 2. Contract R:'agdrpt~9',0713~pw98-18.awd/ajp NT.S. EXHIBIT PROPOSED SIGN LOCATIONS CJMIO ~Vtt, K4k~ZO PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION REPLACE EXISTING STREET NAME SIGN INSTALL NEW STREET NAME SIGN REMOVE EXISTING STREET NAME SIGN CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW98-18 STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 13th day of July, 1999 ,by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and J.K. Weigle Engineering Contractor, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW98-18, STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southem California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereina~er, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW98-18, STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW98-18, STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW98\PW98-18\CONTRACT = o The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW98-18, STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: FORTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED ELEVEN DOLLARS and SIXTEEN CENTS ($40,611.16), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty Five working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. CONTRACT CA-2 R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW98\PW98-18\CONTRACT 10. C, Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. D, In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3 % $75,000-$50O,00O 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over$500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. CONTRACT CA-3 R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW98\PW98-18\CONTRACT Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, adsing directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. 13. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward secudng this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covedng disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives dudng manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP~PROJECTS\PW98\PW98-18\CONTRACT 19. 20. 21. 22. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-5 RACIP~PROJECTS\PW98~,PW98-18\CONTRACT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR J.K. Weigle Engineedn9 Contractor 41827 Cone Lara Temecula, CA 92592 (909) 699-9112 By: J.K Weigle, Owner DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW98~PW98-18\CONTRACT ITEM 23 ORDINANCE NO. 99-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. as follows: Section III. F. 2. of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to read "2. Parking The parking requirements for the Specific Plan shall be the same as those delineated in Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code, as amended, except that no on-site parking is required for uses within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) and Community Commercial/Tourist Support (CCTS) Planning Areas." Section 2. following findings: Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town. Section 3. Environmental Determination. This plan amendment represents a minor modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained in the previously adopted specific plan. The amendment will not change any of the potential physical impacts to the environment assodated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, this action is exempt from environmental review according to the provisions of 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. Annual Review. Staff will annually review the need and suitability for this specific plan amendment and provide a report to the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. R:ords 99-12 I PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do heirsby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-12 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22'" day of June, 1999, and that theirsafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of July, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:ords 99-12 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM I TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: General ManagedBoard of Directors r(~erman Parker, Director of Community Services July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Completion and Acceptance of the Margarita Community Park - Phase I Project No. PW95-19CSD PREPARED BY: ZlJY~{William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer Michael D. Wolff, Senior Inspector- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the Margarita Community Park - Phase I, Project No. PW95-19CSD; and File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and: Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On February 1 O, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract for the Margarita Community Park Phase I, Project PW95-19CSD to Edge Development, Inc. in the amount of $1,351,292.34. The project included a parking lot, group and individual picnic facilities, a restroom, security lighting, a lighted roller hockey rink, a lighted tennis court facility, lighted baseball diamonds, play structures, shad device, and landscaping and irrigation. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount for this project was $1,351,292.34, Contract Change Orders No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were approved by the City Manager in the amount of $131,540.74. This project was funded by Developer Impact Fees for Public Facilities and Developer Impact Fees for Parks and Recreation. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit r:~agdrptLqg~0713~pw95-19.acc 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Edge Development, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: Margarita Community Park - Phase I Project No. PW95-19CSD 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on July 13, 1999, That upon said contract the Reliance Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 95- 19CSD. 6. The street address of said property is: Margarita Road Dated at Temecula, California, this 13'h day of July, 1999. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 13'h day of July, 1999. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk R:\c~; Ilprojects\r~wgE\pwg5-19\completn,not/ajp EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE BOND NO. B2578615 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO. PW95-19CSD MARGARITA COMMUNITY PARK- PHASE I KNOW ~/LL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT: a EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC., 27315 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITE J, TEMECULA, CA 92590 NAME AND ,4DDRES$ OF CONTRACTOR CORPORATION (fill in w!~eiher · C~r~oratlon, Partner~l~i; or individual/ , hereinafter called Principal. and RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, P. O. BOX 81068, SAN DIEGO, CA 92138 NAME AND ADDRESS Ot· SURETY hereinafter ~alled SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinaftar called OWNER, in the penal sum of ONE HUNDRED FORTY EIGHT THOUSAND T~O HUNDRED FORTY NINE DOLLARS end NINETY' NINE '- .... CENTS ($148,249.99) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not les~ than ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns. jointly and severally, firmly by these I~resents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 10TH day of FEBRUARY ,19 98, a copy Of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW95-19CSD, MARGARITA COMMUNITY PARK - PHASE 1. WHERFAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of en~ (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against ell defects in workmanship end materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was a;proved on APRIL 16 , 19.99... NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the said Contra;t, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract. or it shall appear that defective.materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation Shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. MAINTENANCE BOND M- 1 R:~C/RPROJEC11~PWeb'~pW~, 19~lleiC. BIO Signed end sealed this 13TH day of APRIL ,19 99'. (Seal) SURETY ~ELIANCE INSURANCE COZ, fgA24'~ 3y:. lc~, ~ HELEN MALONEY (Name) ATTORNEY- IN-FACT (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney pRINCIpALEDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC. KENNETH DAYNE WA~ONER (Name) VICE PRESIDENT -. (Title) By: (Name) (Title) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County of SAN DIEGO On 4/13/99 before me, JOHN G. MALONEY, NOTARY PUBLIC DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E,G. "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC' KENNETH DAYNE WAGONER, HELEN MALONEY personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ~ COMM. #1212977 - (r) NOTARY pUBLIC-CALIFOR A (/) ~ SAN DIEGO COUNTY rJ - MY COMMISSION EXPIR2: ~: [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(leG), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Though the data requested here is not required by law, ~t could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATU~ARY OPTIONAL SECTION, TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES ~ DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE No, 5193 mm OPTIONAL SECTION m CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER Though Statute does not require the Notary to fill in the data below, doing so may prove invaluable to persons relying on the document. [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER(S) VTCR PRERTDENT TITLE(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) ~ ~ THEFA~EOB;I1-1EtDOCI/IIBIT HAS A COLORED' B.a, CKGROUNrtOII, WHRrE pApERe RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA POWER OF A'I'rORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and that RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, are corporations duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and that RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called "the Companies") and that the Companies by virtue of signature and seals do hereby make, constitute and appoint Helen Maloney. Michael W. Thomas, John G. Maloney, of Escortdido, California their true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on their behalf, and as their act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the Companies and sealed and attested by one other of such officers, and hereby ratif'~es and confirms all that their said Attomey(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VII of the By-Laws of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY which provisions are now in full force and effect. reading as follows: ARTICLE VII - EXECUTION OF BONDS AND LtNDERTAKINGS I. The Bold of Directors, due P~sident, the Chakmnn of the Seard, any Senior Viee President, any Vice President or Assislam Vice Pr~idem or e~traet Off't=t designated by I1~ Board of Disctots shall have pov~r and authorit3, to (a) appoint Auotney(s)-in-Facl and to authod~ them to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakinls, recqnizanc=, conntct- of indemnity and otl~r wtitinls oblilator,/ in I1~ anode thereof, and (b) to remov~ any such Attorney(s)-in-Fact at any dine and t~voiz the power and authority given to d~m. 2. A~orney(s)-in-Fact shall have power and authoti~, subject to the terms and limitations of the Po~e~ of Amy issmd to them, to execute and deliver on be. half of the Company, trends and undmakings, m:ogntnmces, conncts of ind~=mnity and od~r writings o~liga~,y in the nature d~reof, The ooq}erate seal is nm nazsas~/for the validity of any bonds and unde,,lnkings tecognizancet c~qlncts of indemnil~ and odor writings obligatory in the nature thereof, 3. Attotne~s)-in-Fact shall have power and authority to m affidavits required to be attached to Imam, te~ogniza~zs, ~ of indemnity ot od~.r c~dir. iom~ or obliga~P/undeftokings and Ihey shah ~bg have power and authority to ceftif~ the financiaJ statement of the Company and to copies of the Sy-lJws of the Coml~ny or any article or seetin thereof. T~is Power of Atta'ney is shined and sealed by far. simile under and by amity of the followinI resolution adored by the Executive and Finance Committees of the Boards of Directon of P~linnce |nsurlnc~ Cornpiny, United Plcific Insuranc~ Company and Reliance National Indemnity Company by Unanimous Consent ~ as of Feb~m7 28, 19~ ~d by the Executive and Fireracial Cornmitt== of dine B~rd of Direcle6 of P~l~ance Su~t3~ Company by Unanimous Consent dated as of Match 31, 1994. 'R~jofved that the signatures of such directors and ofr~=n and the ~ of the Company may be af~utod to any such Power of Attorney or any certificates re~ting thereto by facsimile, and nay such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such foesitoile sm Or facalmik sad s~all be valid a~d bindial upon the ~ ad any such Power so executed and cenired I~/facaltoile allnatores and facsimile s~l shall ha valid and bindinI upon the Company, in the f~tor~ with re~ect to any bond Or undet~king to which it is anac,~d." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have Mused these presents to be signed and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed, this July 22, 1998. STATE OF Washington } COUNTY OF King } ss. On this, July 22. !998, before me, ee RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY Laura L. Wadsworth, personally appeared Mark W. Alsup, who acknowledged himself to he the VIce President of the Reliance Surety Company, Reliance Insurance Company, United Pacific Insurance Company, and Reliance National Indemnity Company and that as such, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained by signing the name of the corporation by himself as its duly authorized officer. In witness whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. . . ~jotary Public in a~t~( for the State of Washington Residing at Puyallup I. Robyn Layng, Assistant Secretary of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMP- ANY, and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies, which is still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seals of said Companies this13TH day of APRIL year of 19 9 9 THE BACK QFTHISD{3CUMEN'~CONTAINS=ANARTIFiCIAL WATERMARI~- HOLDA'FAN~ANGLEkTO:VIEW; I I I I I ii I II CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW95-19CSD MARGARITA COMMUNITY PARK-PHASE I This is to certify that EDGE Development, Inc. , (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW95-19CSD, MARGARITA COMMUNITY PARK - PHASE 1, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: MARGARITA COMMUNITY PARK - PHASE I The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amountto Dispute Final Progress Billing $ 4,571.91 Retention $ 148.249,98 Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: April 13, 1999 By: Steve Prophet, President Print Name and Title R ELEA SE R- 3 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW95~PW95- } 9~SI~C. BID ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT General ManagedBoard of Directors .j~erman Parker, Director of Community Services July 13, 1999 Award of Construction Contract for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing - Project No. PW97-25CSD PREPARED BY:/Hj/Villiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer t./(./~,O, Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing, Project No. PW97- 25CSD, to Granite Construction Company for $268,268.00, and authodze the President to execute the contract. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $26,826.80, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On March 2, 1999, the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project will include a 610-foot paved bike trail under SR 7g/Winchester Road that will provide a safe crossing for trail users at the Winchester Road Bridge. The undercrossing will eliminate the existing hazard associated with the use of the at-grade crossing and will assist in completing a portion of the Citywide Bike Lane project included in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $313,000.00. Nine (9) bids were publicly opened on July 1, 1999 and results are as follows: 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Granite Construction Company ...................................................................$268,268.00 KAS Equipment & Rental, Inc .....................................................................$274,922.85 Reyes Construction, Inc .............................................................................$283,434.00 4-Con Engineering, Inc ...............................................................................$295,849.00 McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc ........................................................$299,982,00 Johnston Construction Company ...............................................................$315,261.66 CBR Engineering Contractor .......................................................................$322,337.20 1 r:~agdrpt\99\0713\pw97-25.awd/smc 6. Johnston Construction Company ..............................................................$315,261.66 7. CBR Engineering Contractor ......................................................................$322,337.20 8. Mesa Construction Projects, Inc .................................................................$329,065.10 9. KEC Engineering, Inc ................................................................................$382,140.00 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Granite Construction Company Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Granite Construction is currently constructing the improvements for the Pala Road Bridge Project and is performing satisfactorily. The specifications allow Forty (40) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in August, 1999 and be completed by the end of October, 1999. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is partially funded through an award of $159,500 in SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Program grant monies. The balance of funding is from Developer Impact Fees for Parks. Funds have been allocated in the proposed 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program, which will be considered for Council adoption later this evening. The total project is $295,094.80, which included the contract amount of $268,268.00 plus 10% contingency of $26,826.80. ATTACHMENT: Construction Contract 2 r:\agdrpt\99\0713\pw97-25. awd/smc TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW97-25CSD SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BIKE TRAIL UNDERCROSSING THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 13t" day of July, 1999 by and between the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and Granite Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-25CSD, SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BIKE TRAIL UNDERCROSSING, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereina~er, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-25CSD, SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BIKE TRAIL UNDERCROSSING. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-25CSD, SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BIKE TRAIL UNDERCROSSING. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA- 1 R:\cip\projects\pw97',pw97-25\contract The Contract Documents am complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW97-25CSD, SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BIKE TRAIL UNDERCROSSING All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT. DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SIXTY EIGHT DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($268,268.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed FORTY (40) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by DISTRICT. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors, except that the General Manager is hereby authorized by the Board of Directors to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the Board of Directors. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. CONTRACT CA-4 \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA'dDEPTS',PW~CIp~PROYECTS~W97~W97.25\contract. doc The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on forms provided by the DISTRICT. C= Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00-$500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the CONTRACT CA-4 \\TEMEC_FS201~DATAXDEPTSXPWXCIPXPROJECTSXPW97XpW97,25\contract.doc payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the Board of Directors has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the DISTRICT, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT, the County of Riverside, Riverside County Flood Control District and their respective officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT, the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Flood Control District. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the DISTRICT. 12 GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to District's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors 14. upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an CONTRACT CA-4 \\TEMEC_FS201XDATAXDEPTS~PWNCIPXPROJECTSXPWgT~PW97-25\contract. doc 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. affidavit covedng disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO DISTRICT OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to DISTRICT. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the DISTRICT. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by DISTRICT and the Riverside County Flood Control District and their respective authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the DISTRICT addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula,CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-5 \\TEMEC_FS20]~DATA',DEPTS~PW~CIP~PROJECTS~PW97~PW97-25\contract. doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Granite Construction Company P.O. Box 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085 (831) 724-1011 By: R.C. AIIbdtton, Vice President DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Jeff Comerchero, President APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 R:\CIPXPROIECTSXPW97~PW97-25\contract.doc ITEM 3 APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN .E CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors ~,erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services July 13, 1999 Release of Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for Tract No. 28309 - S. R. Group, LLC (Nicolas Road, East of North General Kearny Road) PREPARED BY: ~,~Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to release of the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for the construction of perimeter slope and landscaping within Tract No. 28309 - S. R. Group, LLC. 2. Direct the City Clerk/District Secretary to notify the Developer and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On June 24, 1997, the Board of Directors entered into a Parkland/Landscape Agreement with: S. R. Group, LLC 4532 Sharon Drive La Palma, CA 90623 for the construction of perimeter slope and landscape areas within Tract No. 28309. Accompanying the agreement were surety bonds issued by the American Motorist Insurance Company, as follows: 1. AMIC Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM 908 844 00 the amount of $20,088. 2. AMIC Labor and Materials Bond No. 3SM 908 844 00 in the amount of $10,044.. 3. AMIC Warranty Bond No. 3SM 908 845 00 in the amount of $2,009. On June 22, 1999, the Board of Directors approved the request of the Community Services District to accept this slope area into the TCSD landscape maintenance program beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Therefore, staff is recommending exoneration of the Faithful Performance Bond for these improvements. r:\yaainobkX28309.faithbndrdeaso 071399 The Warranty Bond, in the amount of ten percent of the Faithful Performance Bond, shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be retained for an additional six months to allow for the settlement of all claims and obligations concerning those persons furnishing labor and materials for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: NoRe. r:\yaainobk\28309.faithbndrelea,o 071399 ITEM 4 APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO; FROM: DATE: Board of Directors ._~..erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Authorization to Bid and Determination of Categorical Exemption For the Installation of Citywide Bike Lane Improvements ~,~Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the Board of Directors: Determine that the installation of the Bike Lane Improvements along Jefferson Avenue, Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Margarita Road are Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Authorize the filing of a Notice of Exemption for EA-058, with the appropriate filing fee, for the project with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. Approve the construction documents and authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Citywide Bike Lane Improvements within Jefferson Avenue, Rancho California Road Ynez Road, and Margarita Road. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the AB 2766 Subvention Fund Program, funding is available to the City through December 31, 1999 for the installation of necessary bike lane improvements. As a result of a recently completed inventory report of existing bike lanes, staff has identified the following roadways in need of bike lane striping and signage: Jefferson Avenue/Front Street - Winchester Road to Rancho California Road (approximately 15,600 linear feet) Rancho California Road - Margarita Road to Riesling Court (approximately 14,400 linear feet) Ynez Road - Tower Plaza North to Overland Drive (approximately 10,000 linear feet) Margarita Road - Solana Road to Moraga Road (approximately 4,800 linear feet) R:\yasinobk\agendasXAuth bid of AB2766bikepathfunds The bike lane improvement project will include striping on both sides of the aforementioned roadways, intersection striping, "bike lane" legends, and the appropriate installation of bikeway signage. Due to extensive roadway construction throughout the City, bike lane improvements have been delayed in some areas. As a result of the Overland Bridge construction, the proposed bike lane improvements along Jefferson may be delayed to a later date. However, provisions have been made through the development review process to include bike lanes upon completion of the roadway improvements. In any event, staff anticipates that this project will be out to bid within the next 30 days. The bike lane improvement project for the aforementioned areas has undergone an environmental review and staff is recommending that the Board of Directors make a finding that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. FISCAL IMPACT: The Engineer's estimate for completion of the bike lane signing and striping project is 935,000. This amount is currently funded through AB 2766 Subvention Funds. Funds have been allocated in the proposed 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program, which will be considered for Council adoption later this evening. Annual costs for maintenance will be negligible and absorbed into the City's street maintenance program. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan/Vicinity Maps R:\yasinobk\agendas~Auth bid of AB2766bikepathfunds ~VO 31~3~4~5 g") ~ ~ i-- Of{/} W ' bn Oz o .~_o h-- o, m.u>- '~ ~ n,-m 0 OZ ~o r',o OuJ ~ ~,_o Z -r ~ L~ tn 0 o ~ ,., o m Sl'lB~ ']20NV_-INiZ 0 0 Z Z 0 'S'I'N U') o ~-,-J Ld ~ o <C ~) OZLd~ 'n :~n I-- I--J z z 0 Z ~ a z ao a~ ~ ZO ~,z c~zc~ Ld -- On': Ld cn CO Z bj Z Z I.-_1 z z o ,.o 5 ~, OZ ~ ~ z ZO ~a ,-,..~- z Cr}L,J uJ Zl'- ~-t3 n~ m ~u,I ~'zL, n-zz ~,; I--..~ -zu: ,-,-.< ¢/')l-- Z v i--- i-.- I.-- 0 zzz ITEM 5 CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: General ManagedBoard of Directors Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager July 13, 1999 Approval of Resolution Establishing Fiscal Year 2000-01 Rates and Charges for Service Level B (Residential Street Lights), Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance), Service Level D (Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping) for Redhawk and Vail Ranch Annexation, Subject to Voter Approval Prepared by: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TCSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 DISCUSSION: In response to requests from citizens within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities, the City Council initiated proceedings to annex those communities to the City of Temecula by adopting its Resolution No. 98-74 on July 28, 1998. Following a series of public hearings, the annexation was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) on December 10, 1998. Approval of the annexation, however, was conditioned on the approval by the residents of the annexed territories of the City's taxes and the Temecula Community Services District's rates R:City Clerk~,genda Rpt~Redhawk071399 1 and charges pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 218. In accordance with the requirements of state law, the City mailed notice of the proposed annexation and the proposed rates and charges to each of the residents of the Red hawk and Vail Ranch communities, and the City Council conducted a public hearing on the annexation rates and charges on March 23, 1999. At the conclusion of the public hearing, it was determined that there was no majority protest against the annexation, taxes, rates or charges, and therefore proceedings could continue. The next step in the annexation process is voter approval of the TCSD's rates and charges pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 218. The TCSD rates and charges would replace the existing special tax and assessment levied by County Service Area No. 143 in the areas to be annexed. The TCSD currently levies rates and charges against parcels that receive street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), and refuse collection (Service Level D) from the TCSD. If approved by the voters of Red hawk and Vail Ranch, these rates and charges would be imposed on parcels in those areas at rates that reflect the cost of providing those services. In the case of perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, the cost of providing service to the parcels in the Vail Ranch community is estimated to be $129 per improved residential lot, while the cost of providing service to the parcels in the Redhawk community is estimated to be $206 per improved residential lot. Street lighting and refuse collection rates would be the same as imposed elsewhere in the City. The City Council/TCSD Board determined at an earlier meeting that both the Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities would be required to separately approve the rates and charges against their parcels in order for the annexation to be approved. Therefore, separate ballot questions were approved for the two communities on June 7, 1999. The next regular election at which this voter approval may be obtained is November 2, 1999. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact associated with the annexation is fully addressed in the fiscal impact analysis conducted by the City, which analysis was previously presented to the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Negative Declaration addressing the impacts associated with the annexation was adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1998. Attachments: Resolution Approving Rates and Charges R:City Clerk~AOenda Rpt~Redhawk071399 2 RESOLUTION NO. TCSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes collected within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. Section 3. By its Resolution No. , the City Council ordered the reorganization designated as LAFCO No. 98-14-1, including the annexation of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch specific plan areas to the Temecula Community Services District. Such reorganization was ordered subject to two-thirds voter approval by the residents of the Redhawk specific plan area of rates and charges against parcels within that area for street lighting, slope maintenance, and refuse collection services provided by the TCSD to those parcels and two-thirds voter approval by the residents of the Vail Ranch specific plan area of rates and charges against parcels within that area for street lighting, slope maintenance, and refuse collection services provided by the TCSD to those parcels. Section 4. On March 23, 1999, a public hearing was conducted on the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person concerning the proposed rates and charges were heard and considered. Wdtten protests against the proposed rates and charges were presented by less than a majority of the owners of the parcels upon which the rates and charges are proposed for imposition. Section 5. The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that, based on the District budget, the rates and charges to be imposed do not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided to the affected parcels by the TCSD for fiscal year 2000-01. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the following rates and charges for fiscal year 2000-01 for the services to be provided by the TCSD for fiscal year 2000-01: R:resos\CSD 99- 1 11. Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. $25.68 per improved residential lot for parcels in the Vail Ranch specific plan area $25.68 per improved residential lot for parcels in the Redhawk specific plan area 2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. $129.00 per improved residential lot for parcels in the Vail Ranch specific plan area $206.00 per improved residential lot for parcels in the Red hawk specific plan area 3. Service Level D - Refuse Collection, including Recycling and Street Sweeping. $170.64 per improved residential lot for parcels in the Vail Ranch specific plan area $170.64 per improved residential lot for parcels in the Redhawk specific plan area Section 7. The TCSD shall prescribe, revise and collect such rates and charges pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 8. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner's property for fiscal year 2000-01, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2000, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program. Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for fiscal year 2000-01 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2000, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 10. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 11. The Secretary of the TCSD shall certify to the adoption of this R:resos\CSD 99- 2 Resolution. Section 12. The rates and charges adopted by this resolution shall take effect only if they are approved by a 2/3 vote of the electorate residing within the Redhawk specific plan area voting at an election to be held on November 2, 1999 and also approved by a 2/3 vote of the electorate residing with the Vail Ranch specific plan area voting at an election to be held on November 2, 1999. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this __ day of July, 1999. Jeff Comerchem President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC District Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: AYES: 0 DIRECTORS: None NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC District Secretary/City Clerk R:resos\CSD 99- 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM I APPROVAL.~;r,,""" CITY ATTORNEY TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Agency Members .~ John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager July 13, 1999 Revision of the Residential Improvement Program, the First Time Homebuyer Program, and the Employee Relocation Program Prepared By: Joyce Powers, Senior Redevelopment Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors: 1. Approve the attached revised Program Parameters for the Residential Improvement Program. 2. Approve the attached revised Program Parameters for the First Time Homebuyer Program. 3. Approve the attached revised Program Parameters for the Employee Relocation Program. BACKGROUND: Residential Improvement Pro.eram On September 4, 1996, the Redevelopment Agency approved the Residential Improvement Program to assist low to moderate income property owners with rehabilitation of their home. The program goals are to preserve the supply of affordable housing and eliminate blight. Three components for improving owner-occupied homes compdse the existing Residential Improvement Program: · The Senior Housing Repair Program, which is a grant of up to $3,000 available to seniors with household incomes up to 120% of the median; · The Single-Family Emergency Grant Program, which is a grant of up to $2,500 available to households with incomes up to 80% of median for correction of code violations; and · The Single-Family Paint and Fence Repair Loan Program, which is a forgivable loan of up to $5,000 for families earning up to 80% of median income for extedor improvements. The interest rate on the loan is the pdme rate at the time of closing. R :powersjLstaff reports~'es im prov- F TH B 7-13-99 I Assistance is now available only in the selected assigned neighborhoods of Old Town, La Serena, Winchester Creek, and for all condominiums. Originally, efforts were focused on those neighborhoods appearing to be the most in need. Staff recommends that the program be expanded to the entire city to facilitate preservation of all affordable housing exhibiting signs of aging and deferred maintenance. Redevelopment Agency Housing Funds may be used outside of the project area for this purpose. The attached Revised Program Parameters combine the single-family emergency grant and the paint and fence repair loan as the Home Improvement Loan with a program maximum of $5,000. The loan will remain forgivable in five years if the borrower continues to own and occupy the home. The increase of the eligible income to 100% of median is recommended to assist more families, thereby, expanding preservation efforts. First Time Homebuyer ProGram The First Time Homebuyer Program, adopted in June 1996, has since added 50 new affordable single-family residences to the city's housing stock. The Program offers second trust deed mortgages of up to $24,000 to households earning median income and below. This program also enables the Agency to meet its statutory obligations for low and moderate income housing. Currently, payments are deferred for the first 5 years and then convert to amortized or interest only payments over the remaining 15 years. If the home purchased is located in the assigned neighborhoods of Old Town, La Serena, or Winchester Creek, interest only payments are collected in years 6 through 20. For homes purchased elsewhere in the city, the payments are fully amortized, and there is no forgiveness. The attached Revised Program Parameters create one set of loan terms regardless of the home's location, as long as the borrowers income does not exceed the area median. In addition, the loan term is extended from 20 to 30 years, thereby, reducing monthly payments. The loan terms are currently set at prime (now about 8%) which exceeds the market interest rate for a conventional or FHA first mortgage. Staff recommends reducing the rate to 5% in order to lower monthly payments, allowing more homeowners to qualify for the program. Employee Relocation ProQram The Employee Relocation Program was approved in January 1999 as an Economic Development incentive. It offers a downpayment assistance loan of up to $15,000 to families employed by a company approved for program participation because it has relocated to Temecula or expanded in the City. Staff recommends reducing the interest rate on the loan from the prime rate to 5% so the monthly payments are more affordable and to assure compliance with the Agency's statutory obligations. FISCAL IMPACT: The Residential Improvement Program is funded by the Redevelopment Agency's Housing Set- aside Fund. The FY 1999-2000 budget for this program is $200,000 (account number 165-199- 813-5804). The First Time Homebuyer Program is funded by the Agency's Housing Set-aside Fund. The FY 1999-00 budget is $300,000 (account number 165-199-999-5449). R:powersj~taff reports~res improv-FTHB 7-13-99 2 The Employee Relocation Program is also funded by the Agency's Housing Set-aside Fund. The FY 1999-00 budget is $100,000 (account number 165-199-999-5448). ATTACHMENTS: Revised Program Parameters for the Residential Improvement Program: The Senior Housing Repair Grant The Home Improvement Loan Revised Program Parameters for the First Time Homebuyer Program Revised Program Parameters for the Employee Relocation Program R:powersj%staff reports~res improv-FTHB 7-13-99 3 REVISED PROGRAM PARAMETERS RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SENIOR HOUSING REPAIR GRANT PROGRAM Property Type: Single-family detached homes, condominium units, townhouses, and manufactured homes Property Location: Within the city limits Maximum Amount: $3,000 grant Requirements: The home must be owned and occupied by the senior applicant, aged 55 or older, to be eligible. The applicant's annual gross income may not exceed 120% of the area median income. Housing staff will perform a preinspection of all work to be done to determine its eligibility for funding. Eligible repairs include: · Code items · Deterioration of the structure or fencing · Repair or replacement of roofing · HVAC systems, wall heaters, and evaporative coolers · Windows · Plumbing · Electrical Participants must obtain a minimum of two bids from licensed contractors prior to performance of any work or funding approval. For eligible repairs totaling less than $250, no bids will be required. All work must be inspected by housing staff and building inspections, if required, prior to any payment for the work. Payment may be made directly to the approved contractor or to the homeowner as reimbursement. CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM Property Type: Single-family detached homes, condominium units, townhouses, and manufactured homes Property Location: Within the city limits Maximum Amount: $5,000 loan Loan Terms: A 5-year term at 5% interest. The loan is forgiven on the maturity date if the terms have not been breached. If title to the property is transferred, the borrower ceases to occupy the residence, or if the first mortgage is refinanced and cash is taken out, the loan becomes immediately due and payable. Requirements: The home must be owned and occupied by the applicant(s). The applicant's annual gross income may not exceed the area median income. Housing staff will perform a preinspection of all work to be done to determine its eligibility for funding. Eligible repairs include: · Code items · Deterioration of the structure or fencing · Repair or replacement of roofing · HVAC systems, wall heaters, and evaporative coolers Windows · Plumbing · Electrical · Front yard irrigation Participants must obtain a minimum of two bids from licensed contractors prior to performance of any work or funding approval. All work must be inspected by housing staff and building inspections, if required, prior to any payment for the work. Payment may be made directly to the approved contractor or to the homeowner as reimbursement. Work completed before loan approval is not eligible for funding. REVISED PROGRAM PARAMETERS FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER PROGRAM CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRST TIME BUYER PROGRAM The City of Temecula FTHB Program is designed to provide loan assistance to lower income persons in the purchase of their first home. Assistance may be provided for a portion of the down payment and/or closing costs associated with the purchase of a home. The amount of assistance available depends upon the buyer's qualifications and the price of the home. The maximum amount of assistance is twenty percent (20%) of the purchase price plus closing costs, up to a total loan amount of $24,000. Loan Terms: This a 30-year second mortgage loan at 5% interest. The loan is deferred for the first 5 years, then fully amortized in years 6-30. If the borrower transfers title, ceases to occupy the property as his or her principal residence, or refinances with cash taken out, the loan becomes due and payable. To ~3ualifv as a first time homebuyer: The purchaser cannot have owned a home for the previous three years from the date of application. The purchaser must sign a sworn application attesting that they have not owned a home. In addition, the last three years tax returns will be reviewed to ascertain that no mortgage interest or real estate tax deductions have been claimed. For the purposes of determining home ownership, a dwelling unit that was not permanently affixed to a permanent foundation (i.e., a mobile home) shall not be included in the three-year requirement. Qualifying incomes: In order to be eligible for this program, the buyer's annual income shall not exceed the area median income, as determined by HUD, adjusted for family size. Income limits are adjusted annually. Other buyer reauirements: The buyer must have sufficient income and creditworthiness to qualify for a first mortgage through one of the Participating Lenders. In addition, the buyer must provide a minimum of three percent (3%) of the purchase price as a down payment from their own funds and must accept the highest loan-to-value ratio first loan for which they qualify. Maximum home price: The purchase price of the home is limited only by the applicant's ability to qualify for financing. The purchase price shall not exceed the fair market value indicated by a property appraisal. Eligible 13rollerties: The FTHB program may be used to purchase any new or resale home that is: (1) in the City limits; (2) permanently fixed to a permanent foundation; (3) has a minimum of two bedrooms; and, (4) is currently occupied by the Seller or vacant (tenant-occupied homes are not eligible.) The purchaser must reside in the home as his or her principal residence within sixty (60) days of purchase. The home must be in sound condition and meet both Housing Quality Standards as determined by the RDA and applicable Building and Safety standards; it must also be suitable for occupancy upon purchase. Furthermore, the borrower shall agree to maintain the home in good condition for the term of the RDA assistance. The purchaser shall be required to obtain a one- year home warranty as part of the home purchase. REVISED PROGRAM PARAMETERS EMPLOYEE RELOCATION PROGRAM CITY OF TEMECULA EMPLOYEE RELOCATION PROGRAM The Employee Relocation Program is designed to assist families, with their home purchase, who are moving to the City of Temecula due to relocation of their Employer. The City of Temecula offers a second trust deed loan of up to 10% of the purchase price, but not to exceed $15,000. The City's assistance loan benefits families by providing them with a downpayment for which they do not have to make monthly payments during the first five years. To be eligible, the Applicant must be employed with a company that has been approved by the City of Temecula to participate in the Program. The companies include those that have recently expanded or relocated to the City. In addition, the Applicant's gross annual household income must be below the following limits according to their family size: Household Members Income Limit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 $39,650 $45 300 $51 000 $56 650 $61 200 $65 700 $70 250 8 or more $74 800 *The ~comelimitsare 120% of~e ama median ~come and aresubjectto change annually. Loan Terms: This is a 30-year second mortgage loan. Repayment terms are as follows: · For the first 5 years, there are no payments required on the downpayment assistance. · For the remaining 25 years, repayment of the assistance loan, at 5% simple interest, is fully amortized and collected in 300 equal monthly payments. Purchase Price: The purchase price of the home is limited only by the applicant's ability to qualify for financing. Buver's Investment: The buyer must contribute a minimum of 3% of the purchase price toward the acquisition of their home. Allowable Assets: The buyer's family assets (excluding personal property and funds in restricted retirement accounts) remaining after close of escrow may not exceed a 12 month housing expense. (PITI) reserve. Closinq Costs: Closing costs may be paid by the downpayment assistance loan as long as total assistance does not exceed $15,000. Eligible Properties: The Program is available for new and resale properties city-wide. Single family homes, condominiums, and townhouses, which are either vacant or owner-occupied, are eligible. The home must be in sound condition and meet Housing Quality Standards as determined by the RDA. Although the homebuyer need not be a first time buyer, the home purchased under this program must be the Recipient's primary residence. Availability of Downpayment Assistance: Program assistance is available to eligible applicants for up to one year after the date of the appmved employer's relocation or expansion, as long as program funds are available. First Mortgage Lender: Any lender previously approved by the City may participate in the Program. The participating lender must accept the City's loan application concurrently with their application and is responsible for all loan processing. Future Re~nancing: The City will subordinate the assistance loan, second to a new first mortgage, only if no cash is taken out during the refinance transaction. ITEM 2 ATT APPROVA~ CITY ORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER TEMECULA lIEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Executive Director/Agency Members an John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment M ag DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Revision of the Facade Improvement Program Prepared By: Joyce Powers, Senior Redevelopment Analyst RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Agency Board approve the recommended revisions to the Farfade Improvement Program. BACKGROUND: The Facade Improvement Program was originally approved in April 1995 as a rebate program to facilitate rehabilitation and enhance the western theme in the Toudst Retail Core in Old Town. The existing Facade Improvement Program provides: · an initial grant of up to $5,000; · an additional $5,000 forgivable loan, and, · for projects over $10,000, a rebate ranging from 30% to 50%, depending on project costs (maximum rebate amount is $10,000). To streamline the program and eliminate the document processing required for the forgivable loan, staff recommends the following: an initial grant of up to $5,000; and, a 50% matching rebate of eligible costs up to a program maximum of $15,000 in RDA rebate funds ($30,000 in actual costs). Assistance of up to $20,000 would be available, depending on the valuation of eligible improvements and size of the store front or building. The applicant would first apply for the $5,000 grant, and would then be eligible for a 50% rebate of costs over $5,000 up to a $15,000 rebate. For a few projects involving extensive structural seismic modifications and/or fire sprinklers, $20,000 has proven to be inadequate. Therefore, staff is recommending an additional $15,000 grant for the more extensive public safety rehabilitation. The additional expenses often discourage owners from reoccupying commercial property that is standing vacant. This incentive will pursue City and Agency goals to preserve histodc and other aged structures in Old R:powersj\fa~ade~taffrpt 7-13-99 1 Town. After surveying the area, staff estimates that approximately 3-5 structures would be eligible for the additional assistance. In addition to the grants and rebates discussed above, the Agency may consider a low-interest loan for significant rehabilitation projects. These projects will be submitted to the Agency Board for approval on a case by case basis. FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 1999-00 budget for the Fac,,ade Improvement Program is $150,000 (account number 280-99-813-5804). ATTACHMENT: Revised Facade Improvement Program Parameters R :powersj~fa~ade~staffrpt 7-13-99 2 REVISED PROGRAM PARAMETERS FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OLD TOWN FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Improving and upgrading building facades within Old Town's Tourist Retail Core is one of the important goals of the Redevelopment Agency. The Redevelopment Agency is offering this Old Town Facade Improvement Program as an incentive to participating businesses to rehabilitate existing non- residential buildings in need of external and internal rehabilitation work and to bring structures up to existing building and safety codes. The Program is designed to bring new life to existing buildings in the Tourist Retail Core which do not conform to the "Old West" design theme as specified in the City's Old Town Specific Plan. By assisting property owners to upgrade the appearance and safety of their buildings, the aesthetic environment of Old Town is further authenticated, thus improving the economic climate for all merchants and the City as a whole. The Redevelopment Agency offers financial assistance to property owners and tenants in the Old Town area in the form of grants and rebates, thereby making rehabilitation both affordable and desirable to participating businesses. Financing options are discussed in the Financial Assistance section. TARGET PROJECTS The following are "target projects" that the Facade Improvement Program is designed to assist in order to upgrade the project area: 2. 3. 4. Buildings with seismic deficiencies or other Temecula City Code violations including but not limited to Fire, Safety, Planning, and Building Codes; Buildings in need of facade renovation (including rear treatments); Businesses in need of bringing existing signage into conformance with current code requirements; and Businesses located in the Tourist Retail Core district. PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY In order to meet the requirements for project funding under the California Community Redevelopment Law, to comply with health and safety elements and requirements, and to leverage available funds to the greatest extent possible, the following eligibility criteria have been established: The building shall be located in the Old Town Specified Plan area. Participants must bring non-conforming uses and non-conforming signage into compliance with current applicable City and Agency requirements. The rehabilitation work must be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines in effect at the time of application. The rehabilitation work must meet all appropriate City Codes, Ordinances, and Standards. ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS The following construction, rehabilitation, and project activities are eligible for funding: Painting of entire building (all painted surfaces are required to be repainted); Awnings, marquees, parapet walls, doors, windows, arcade/canopy facade and display window lighting, signs; Removal of non-conforming signs; Tile and pavement between door and sidewalk; Corrections of conditions necessary to bring structures and/or signage into conformance with City Codes and Ordinances including but not limited to Fire, Americans with Disability Act (ADA), Planning, Building Codes, and seismic standards; and, Other similar facade improvements as approved by the City. INELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS/RESTRICTIONS The following construction, rehabilitation, and/or project activities are not eligible for funding: Routine maintenance such as landscaping; All interior improvements, except display lighting; General structural upgrade improvements not required by Building, ADA, and Fire Codes and/or City Codes; New construction; No existing work or completed improvements; Any projects not specifically reviewed and approved by the Agency in conjunction with the Program; Trade fixtures and equipment; Restroom additions or modifications required due to change in occupancy. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Below are the Facade Improvement Program requirements. These requirements are subject to change without notice. Additionally, project funding is subject to availability of program funds. All improvements must be approved in advance by the Planning Department, OTLRB, and as required, the Planning Commission. Applicants must submit two written bids from licensed contractors. Applicants of multiple businesses within a building are encouraged to work together to receive one set of bids for the entire building. All work must be completed by contractors licensed by the State of California. The applicant is responsible for selecting a contractor, and executing agreements. No work is to begin until after the Agreement is signed by the City, property owner, and business owner. A Facade Improvement Program sign will be displayed either on the exterior or in a front window of the building, from the date of the application approval until 30 days after completion of all improvements. After the completion of the project the applicant shall submit to the City a statement indicating his/her satisfaction with the work performed by the contractor prior to releasing the funds to the contractor. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE The Agency will offer financial assistance in the form of grants and/or rebates, thereby making rehabilitation both affordable and desirable to participating businesses in the project area. The following options are available and may be combined: Initial Grant An initial grant of up to 95,000 per applicant is available for eligible improvements. Sul~l~lemental Grant for required seismic, foundation, and fire safety iml~rovements The property owner may apply for an additional grant of up to 915,000 to correct seismic and foundation deficiencies confirmed by the Building Department and for fire sprinklers and fire walls required by the Uniform Fire Code. 2 Rebate The Participants may request a 50% matching rebate of eligible costs up to $15,O00 in RDA rebate funds ($30,O00 in actual costs). The amount of the rebate available to the applicant is calculated on a linear foot basis of ~ 100. Linear feet shall be those of the individual business front facade for a merchant applicant. For a property owner applicant improving the entire building, linear feet shall be the front facade of the building, including any second floor business facade, up to a maximum of 150 linear feet. The rebate received may not exceed the eligible facade linear feet multiplied by ~ 1 O0 or ~ 15,000, whichever is lower. Before construction begins, the applicant must deposit private funds with the Finance Department to cover any costs which will not be paid from Facade Improvement Program funds to ensure completion of the project. When the project is completed and finaled by the Building Department, the applicant must provide the Agency copies of all work receipts and invoices. If all work is complete and satisfactory, the Agency will issue a Certificate of Completion for the project and release the appropriate funds. Progress payments may be approved for projects over $5,000. Once the funds have been issued, applicants commit to properly maintain the improvements and keep storefronts clean and free from graffiti. If an applicant fails to meet the terms and conditions as outlined in the Agreement, all assistance will be due and payable within 60 days of notification. R:jpowers\facade\disclosure ITEM 3 APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINA CITY MANAGER TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Agency Members ge.E~ John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Mana ~ July 13, 1999 Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency adopt an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group for the potential redevelopment of the Poole Property. BACKGROUND: Per direction of the Agency Board, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to redevelop the Poole property was issued on April 22, 1999. Three firms responded by the May 20, 1999 deadline. All three firms were given interviews, which were held on June 21, 1999. The Selection Committee was made up of Mayor Ford, Councilmember Comerchero, Deputy City Manager Thornhill and Housing and Redevelopment Manager Meyer. The Committee selected Hopkins Real Estate Group based on their past experience with similar projects, their vision and approach to redeveloping the project site. Per the terms of this Agreement, the Hopkins Group will be given ninety (90) days to market the Poole property. During this time, the Hopkins Group will hold a workshop with key stakeholders in Old Town to understand what the local vision is for the project site. Additionally, they will contact local, regional and national restaurants to seek their interest in participating in the project. Retailers and other potential users will also be contacted. At the end of the ninety (90) days, the Hopkins Group will then present their findings on project scope and feasibility to the Agency. If the results are positive, a Disposition and Development Agreement between the Agency and the Hopkins Group will be prepared for Agency Board consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed agreement. ATTACHMENT: 1. Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group 2. Site Exhibit R:\Oldtown~staffreports~hopkinsem.docl EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT THIS EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of July 13, 1999 by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic ("Agency"), and Hopkins Real Estate Group "Developer"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agency and the Developer hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, which each of the paxties acknowledge to be true and correct: a. The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter "Plan") for Re, development Project No. 1--1988 (hereafter "Project Area") by providing an efficient and fair method for determining the development potential and negotiating a disposition and development agreement for the development of certain property within the Project Area of the Plan, in accordance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.) and the Plan. b. The property which is the subject of this Agreement is located at 28699 Front Street, City of Temecula ("Site") which is generally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. c. The Agency desires the Site to be developed as Retail/Restaurant consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan as feasible. Section 2. Negotiations. a. The Agency and the Developer agree for the duration of the Negotiation Period to negotiate diligently and in good faith to determine the feasibility of development of the Site and to prepare a disposition and development agreement to be considered for approval between the Agency and the Developer with respect to the development of a project on the Site. The Agency agrees for the period set forth below not to negotiate with any other person or entity or enter into any other exclusive negotiating agreement regarding the acquisition, disposition or development of the Site, except as to any negotiations or agreements which may be required to comply with owner participation rights under the Plan and redevelopment law. "Good faith negotiations" shall mean that Developer and Agency shall use commercially reasonable efforts to communicate frequently and follow commercially reasonable negotiation procedures to develop an agreement mutually acceptable to the Developer and the Agency for the development of a project on the Site. b. The "Negotiation Period" shall be for ninety (90) from the date of this Agreement. If, upon the expiration of the Negotiation Period, the Developer has not signed and submitted a disposition and development agreement to the Agency, acceptable to the \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\REDEV\SYERSK\AGREEMEN\Hopkinsagreement 6/28/99 1481098 Executive Director, this Exclusive Negotiating Agreement shall automatically terminate unless the Negotiation Period has been mutually extended in writing by the Executive Director and the Developer as provided below. If a disposition and development agreement is so signed and submitted by the Developer within the Negotiation Period, then this Exclusive Negotiating Agreement is extended for thirty (30) days from the date of such submittal to enable the Agency to (1) determine whether it desires to enter into such a disposition and development agreement, (2) hold the public hearings required by redevelopment law and take the actions necessary to authorize the Agency to approve the agreement, if the Agency desires to do so, and (3) sign the agreement. The Negotiation Period may be extended by the written consent of the Executive Director, provided the time extensions approved by the Executive Director do not exceed an additional ninety (90) days. Section 3. Scope of Negotiations. During the Negotiation Period (and any mutually agreed upon extensions), the Agency and Developer shall make good faith efforts to: a. Market the Site to potential tenants and determine the feasibility of potential uses for the Site. b. Define the scope of development, site plans and architectural concept for the development as deemed appropriate by Agency staff. c. Determine the schedule for the implementation of the proposed project. d. Determine the financial feasibility of the proposed project. proposed project. Negotiate the amount and type of Agency assistance appropriate for the f. Developer shall provide such other and further information, reports, and assistance as deemed reasonably appropriate by the Agency and/or its staff in order to fulfill the objectives of this Agreement, along with copies of such reports. g. Negotiate the terms of a disposition and development agreement with the Agency for the sale or lease of the Site with appropriate use and building restrictions. h. From time-to-time as requested by the Executive Director of the Agency, the Developer shall make oral and written progress reports advising the Agency and its staff on all matters and all studies being made. Section 4. Allocation of Costs. a. The Agency shall pay for a title report and the soils and environmental testing report for the Site and pwvide copies of these documents to Developer. Agency's legal counsel shall draft the disposition and development agreement and such other legal documents 2 6/28/99 1481098 as may be required, at the Agency's expense. Agency shall be responsible for the costs of its staffs' time. Agency shall not be responsible for any costs incurred by the Developer in complying with the requirements of this Agreement including, without limitation, costs for studies, reports, consultants, or staff time. b. Developer shall pay for and be liable for all costs which it incurs in complying with the requirements of this Agreement including, without limitation, costs for studies, reports, consultants, legal counsel, accountants, or staff time. Agency shall not be responsible for the costs of the review and negotiation of the disposition and development agreement by Developer's legal counsel. The Developer shall be liable for any real estate commissions or brokerage fees which may arise herefrom and Agency shall not be liable for such costs. The Agency represents that it has engaged no broker, agent or finder in connection with this transaction, and the Developer agrees to hold the Agency harmless from any claim by any broker, agent or finder retained by the Developer. c. Developer shall provide Agency with copies of all reports and studies it prepares or causes to be prepared concerning the Site, which Agency may use whether or not an agreement is approved with Developer for the Site. Section 5. Limits of Exclusive Negotiating Agreement. a. By its execution of this Exclusive Negotiating Agreement, the Agency is not committing itself to or agreeing to undertake: (a) financing, acquisition or disposition of land to the Developer; or (b) any other acts or activities requiring the subsequent independent exercise of discretion by the Agency, the City or any agency or department thereof. The parties recognize that one or more of the conditions to the Developer' s proposal as may be developed and submitted to the Agency during the course of the Negotiation Period may fail to be met as a result of negotiations, subsequent studies, reviews and proceedings involving the exercise of discretion by the Agency, the City or any agency or department thereof. b. This Exclusive Negotiating Agreement does not constitute a disposition of property or exercise of control over property by the Agency or the City and does not require a public hearing. Execution of this Exclusive Negotiating Agreement by the Agency is merely an agreement to enter into a period of exclusive negotiations according to the terms hereof, reserving final discretion and approval by the Agency and the City as to any disposition and development agreement and all proceedings and decisions in connection therewith. 3 6/28199 1481098 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first-above written. "AGENCY" REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic By: Karel F. Lindemans Chairperson ATFEST: Susan W. Jones Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter Thorson General Counsel DEVELOPER Hopkins Real Estate Group 13 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Frederick J. Stemmler Chief Operating Officer -4- 6/28/99 1481098 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIFFION OF SITE LOTS 9, 10 AND 11 OF BLOCK 29 IN TOWN OF TEMECULA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 15 PAGE (S) 726 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 79-68, RECORDED APRIL 25, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 80865 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9, AND LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11; ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 75-104, RECORDED APRIL 25, 1975 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 46491 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11, AND LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11; ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION VACATED BY RESOLUTION 95-86 RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 447565 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 6128/99 1481098 III HOPKINS REAL ESTATE GROUP May17,1999 Mr. John Meyer Housing and Redevelopment Manager Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Statement of Interest NWC Front Street and Second Street "Old Town" Temecula APN # 922-046-020 Dear Mr. Meyer: Urban Village Associates and Hopkins Real Estate Group ("HREG") are pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications to develop the 12,750 square foot site known as the "Old Town" Temecula, Northwest Corner of Front Street and Second Street, Temecula, California. To ensure that the site is developed successfully, Urban Village Associates and Hopkins Real Estate Group have teamed up to propose the development of a mixed use commercial retail project, HREG is proposing that high quality ground level restaurant and specialty retail be developed. Over the last 25 years, HREG has distinguished 'itself as a recognized leader in commercial retail and mixed-use urban infill development and redevelopment. HREG brings its expertise in negotiation, entitlement, construction, marketing, and management of commercial office and commercial retail projects. HREG has developed in excess of 100 projects located all over the State of California. HREG regularly partners with cities and redevelopment agencies and emphasizes urban infill projects in its repertoire of development projects. HREG projects have helped communities eliminate blight, create local jobs, and generate larger sales tax revenues. This proposal will serve to meet the goals of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the local community by providing a high-quality office and retail development to the "Old Town" area. 13 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200, Newport Beach, California 92660 · (949) 64E~1770 FAX [949) 644-8631 Web Site: www. hopkinsgroup,com Mr. John Meyer May 17, 1999 Page 2 The development team will bring the following guidelines to the development: Understanding of the needs of the Redevelopment Agency, Planning Commission, City Council, local citizens, and neighborhood groups and implementing consensus building tools to achieve the goals of these project constituents; Providing the City with the development expertise to carry out the project from conceptual phase through construction; 3. Providing the local citizens with a quality project that will serve their needs; Utilizing high-quality design consultants, architects, landscape' architects, and civil engineers to ensure that all projects are of a high quality caliber that will enhance and bring long-term value to the community; Providing the City with the expertise in negotiating and managing similar projects and carrying through with the details that help define great projects; and 6. Providing solid and dependable equity and construction resources for the project. HREG has approached the design of the proposed project with these same principles and will work closely with the neighborhood in order to understand its specific goals and implement same into the proposed project. HREG anticipates designing and building a project that will be responsive to the opportunities and constraints of the site and will conform to the financial goals of the Redevetopment Agency. HREG has provided a comprehensive resume of its experience within this Statement of Qualifications proposal. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to participate in. this Statement of Qualifications process. If we can be of further assistance or if you .have any questions, please feel free to contact Frederick J. Stemruler at Urban Village Associates/Hopkins Real Estate Group at 949.640.1770 x234. We look forward to hearing from the Rede. velopment Agency of the City of Temecula in the near future. Very truly yours, HO~EAL ES,~TATE GROUP Chief Operatir{g-Officer FJS:bih:rfq:soi-temecula ~HOPKINS REAL ESTATE GROUPI SUMMARY OF COMPANY Hopkins Real Estate Group (HREG) and its affiliate, Urban Housing Group (UHG), have been active participants in the redevelopment process since 1981. The parent company has been in business since 1972. UHG's senior management has a long track record in developing real estate within redevelopment areas of cities throughout California. The Senior Management Team has also developed projects in 40 other cities throughout California. The company's senior management has a long track record of development primarily in urban in-fill retail development and has developed multiple projects in cities including Anaheim, El Cajon, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Lakewood, La Mirada, Newport Beach, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego and Santa Ana. A majority of these projects were partially financed by various governmental programs in the respective communities, including Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") monies, Section 108 monies and other tax increment financing methodologies. These developments have helped communities to eliminate blight, create a more diversified local employment base and generate greater sales tax revenues. · . HREG is committed to creating quality shopping centers. Since 1972, the professionals at HREG have successfully developed more than one hundred commercial retail centers throughout California. With an emphasis on urban in-fill projects, including those from the ground up and rehabilitation, HREG works together with community leaders, retailers, investors and landowners to create the most innovative and profitable retail centers in the marketplace today. Relationship building has been a standard method of doing business at HREG since its inception. Long before "partnering" became a fashionable term, HREG defined itself by its relationships. As the company moves forward, these relationships will continue to serve as the cornerstone of HREG. UHG represents the expansion of HREG's highly successful involvement in the commercial real estate business. UHG specializes in the acquisition, rehabilitation, and management of multi-family housing throughout the Western United States. In addition to acquiring stabilized properties, the company also seeks turnaround and redevelopment opportunities -including public/private partnership ventures. ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIFiECT CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager July 13, 1999 Granting of an Easement for Southern California Edison RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency adopts a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL SUPPLY AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE MISSION VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT. BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency has partnered with the Affirmed Housing Group to rehabilitate 38 existing apartment units and develop 38 new units. All 76 units will remain affordable for 30 years. The attached documents are for electrical supply systems and communication systems for the Mission Village project along the westedy side of Pujol, south of Sixth Street. This easement needs to be granted by the Agency and recorded to facilitate construction activities for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 99- 2. Exhibit"A" 3. Exhibit "B" 4. Grant of Easement \\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\REDEV\PROJECTS\G RANTEASEMENTSCE.doc 07/O8/99 1 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99~ A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL SUPPLY AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE MISSION VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The legal description for the easement is set forth and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula grants an Easement for electrical supply systems and communication systems, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", for the purposes stated therein. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting on the 13th day of July 1999. Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSDIE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) \\TEMEC_FS201~DATAXDEPTS\REDEV~ROJECTSLRESOLUTIONGRANTEASEMENTSCE.doc 07/0g/99 1 I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Agency Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Agency Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July 1999, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary \NTEMEC FS201\DATAXDEPTS\REDEVXPROJECTSXRESOLUTIONGRANTEASEMENTSCE.doc 07/08/99 2 EXHIBITA LEGAL DESCRIPTION Fortner Property Page 1 of 1 IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF TEMECULA, BEING THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA93-0107, RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 334292 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, NORTH 45°29'22'' WEST 20.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF NON-TANGENT CURVE BEARS NORTH 47°50'18" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.86 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24°51 "24" TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING THE CUSP OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CUSP BEARS NORTH 64°34'07" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTELRY LINE AND SAID CURVE 29.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°23'32.' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 224 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. A MAP ENTITLED "EXHIBIT I" IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE. BASIS OF BEARINGS: FIELD SURVEY BASED ON FIRST STREET WEST OF FRONT STREET BEARING NORTH 44030'26" EAST PER PM 7674 (86/50-51). NORRIS-REPKE, INC. 33055 VINO WAY TEMECULA, CA 92591 JN 92-03/4 JACK P. NORRIS, P.E. C15446 REFERENCE FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. REPORT, ORDER # 2O34432, DATED JUNE 22, 1995. September 23, 1996 A.P.N. 922-073-022 ,9203%427SD.LGL COURSE TABLES CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C1 55.00' 23.86' 24'51 C2 50.00' 29.14' 33'23'32" L1 N 45'29'22" W 20.94' EXHIBIT 0 APN 922-073-022 Q_ C~ O EL j Cu _j E..j FIRST STREET N 4-4'50'26" E GRAPHIC SCALE AREA: 224- S.F. J: (0.0051 AC) 0 5~0 10 0 l(IN FEET ) ) tr NORR S--REPKE INC "~ Prepared by OWNER: WILLIAM E FORTNER AND D ........... "" .....~'~ """"' ..... MARGARET' ANN FORTNER 1/3 E'~ [xC._ ~2U~2591 ~k~&~ ,~5~~ ~?' ,~.~ ;:~ ~:~ :m:"L ,~-o~ ~ DRAV/N RCM APPR. JPN ORDER ~ 2034427 A.P.N. 922-073-022 PCL. 1, LLA PA93-0107 INST.# 334292, D.R. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA CITY OF TEMECULA DATE 9-23-96 SCALE 1' = 50 BY NORRIS-REPKE INC. E:\sdskproj\9203\dwg\jpntds,dw9 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF TEMECULA PER GOVERNMENT CODE 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAlL TO City ofTeme~ula - City Clerk 43200 Business Park Drive P O Box 9033 Teme~ula CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO City of Tetnecula 43200 Business Park Drive P O Box 9033 Temecula CA 92589-9033 EASEMENT DEED - DRAINAGE PURPOS~ FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GRANTS to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for drainage purposes, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described as: See Attached Exhibit "A" for Complete Description IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument this day of , 1999 Print Name and Title STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE} On , before me the undersigned, a Notary Pubhe in and for the State of California, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instant and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ACCEPTANCE CERTFICATE The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney \\TEMEC_F$201~DATA~DEFrS~W'~AGMTS~DRAINAGE EASEMENT.DOC ITEM 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Recommend Approval to the City Council for PA98-0511, a Zoning Amendment to create a Planned Development Overlay, and the Planning Commission's approval of PA98-0512, a proposal to develop a 244 unit senior apartment complex with two and three story buildings on an 8.13 acre lot. Prepared by: Thomas Thornsley, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: Continuation of this matter to the July 27, 1999, City Council meeting. BACKGROUND: Chris Pedersen, the appellant, filed a formal appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on both projects listed above. However, he will be unavailable to attend the July 13, 1999, City Council meeting. He has requested that this matter be continued to the next City Council meeting (See Attachment). July 6, 1999 The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Couneil The Ci~t of Temeeula Delivered By Faesimfie Re: Appeal of planning Commission Decision; Planning Application No. PA98-0511; Planning Application No. PA98-0512. I will be out of ton on a vacation planned months ago on the July 13, 1999 scheduled date of the hearing of the referenced appeal. I respectfully request that this mare be heard on the following meeting of the City Counsil, or such other time as is convenient for the Council and other affected parties. Thauk you for your consideration. Chris Pedersen 31052 Wellington Circle Ternecula, California 92591 Phone 699-7102 ITEM 25 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/Cit Mana e Gary Thornhill;~e~~y Manager July 13, 1999 Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0446; 2. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0446; 3. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP CHANGE) AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L1 (1 ACRE TO 2.5 ACRE NET LOT SIZE) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 (1/2 ACRE TO 1 ACRE NET LOT SIZE), ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO STREET AND ORMSBY ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 945-070-011 BACKGROUND: On May 19, 1999, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 subdividing the subject property into two residential lots, contingent upon the City Council approval of this zoning amendment. The Commission found that the map and zone change were consistent with the General Plan, because the General Plan designation allows for a range of lot sizes from ¼ acre to 2 acres, both the L1 and L2 zoning designations. Furthermore, the General Plan identifies the property to be within the Chaparral Area, and the Commission reviewed the project in terms of the opportunities and constraints discussed in the General Plan for this area. The subject site does not exhibit any of the constraints characteristics, and its density is consistent and compatible with surrounding zoning. There already exists L2 zoning to the north and east, and R:\STAFFRPT\446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 1 the proposed lots would be similar to adjacent lots on Estero Court. Low Medium (LM) zoning is adjacent to the west, and the proposed L2 zoning would be an appropriate transition between the 7,200 square foot lot minimums to the west and the larger lot sizes to the south. Letters in Opposition The Planning Commission received three (3) letters in opposition to the zone change and lot split from neighborhood property owners. These letters are attached to this staff report. FISCAL IMPACT: Minimal. One additional residential lot will result in an insignificant effect upon both public services and revenues. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. Ordinance No. 99- approving Planning Application No. PA97-0446 - Page 3 Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 19, 1999 - Page 6 Planning Commission Minutes from May 19, 1999 - Page 7 Correspondence Received - Page 8 A. John & Roberta Martinez dated May 5, 1999 B. Denny & Sue Gosser dated May 17, 1999 C. Wilson E. & Brook Nolan dated May 18, 1999 R:\STAFFRPT\446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP CHANGE), AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L1 (1 ACRE TO 2.5 ACRE NET LOT SIZE) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 (1/2 ACRE TO I ACRE NET LOT SIZE), ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO STREET AND ORMSBY ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 945-070-011 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ching G. Lee filed Planning Application No. PA97-0446 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning laws of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The change to the land use district herein are hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in effect the zone as described in Planning Application No. PA97-0446. Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project which determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated. Section 5. Posting. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRl:~446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this thirteenth day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the thirteenth day of July, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk VxTEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 19, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 6 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 19,1999 Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) and Planning Application No. PA97-0444 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) Prepared By: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 99- recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning Application No. PA97-0444 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application Nos. PA97-0446 and PA97-0444; and ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0446 and PA97-0444. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Ching G. Lee REPRESENTATIVE: Markham and Associates PROPOSAL: To amend the City's Zonihg Map, changing the zoning of the property from Low Density Residential L1 (1 acre to 2.5 acre net lot size) to Low Density Residential L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre net lot size); and To subdivide 1.07 net acres into two residential lots. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Estero Street and Ormsby Road EXISTING ZONING: L1 (1 acre to 2.5 acre net lot size) ~\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP~-~?,pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 1 SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre net lot size) L1 (1 acre to 2.5 acre net lot size) L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre net lot size) LM Low Medium Density Residential (7,200 square foot lot size minimum) PROPOSED ZONING: L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre net lot size) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: L Low Density Residential (.5 to 2 dwelling units per acre) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Estero Court, single family residences, vacant lot Vacant Vacant and single family residences Single Family subdivision BACKGROUND The owner's representative submitted Planning Application Nos. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change), PA97-0d4d (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) and PA97-0445 (Waiver of Final Map) on December 30, 1997. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on January 29, 1998. In February 1998 the representative provided staff with a revised map and additional information as requested, but did not wish to proceed to public headng before completing requirements necessary to qualify for a waiver of the final map. In an Apdl 6, 1998 letter, the representative reiterated the owners desire to keep the file active while pursuing completion of street improvements. In a September 23, 1998 letter to the applicant, staff asked for an update, and on October 5, 1998 the representative responded that work was being completed within three to four weeks. Finally, on April 6, 1999 the representative concluded all necessary requirements including an updated SAN 53 Letter from Environmental Health, allowing for the project to proceed to public headng. HISTORY Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 is similar to Tentative Parcel Map No. 25607, which was submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on January 23, 1990. It was transmitted to the City of Temecula in June 1990 and denied by the Temecula Planning Commission on January 28, 1991 by a 3-2 vote. An appeal of the Commission's decision was denied by the City Council on April 9, 1991 by a 3-1-1 (abstention) vote. Resolution No. 91-35 states that in denying the map the City Council made these pertinent findings: There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 25607 may be inconsistent with the General Plan being prepared at this tim. The project does not propose the proper infrastructure for the proposed density with use of subsurface sewage disposal and lack of adequate paved access. \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~.~.~?.pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 2 The site is not suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access and density. The project does not have appropriate off-site access and does not provide sewer service. The City Attomey's office recommended that the applications for Tentative Parcel Map 28000 and its accompanying Change of Zone be accepted and processed by the City because there is no time restriction on denials and because the project complied with the General Plan and Development Code adopted since the denial. ANALYSIS The Zoning Amendment, MaD Change The City adopted its General Plan on November 9, 1993. The subject property was designated as L1 Low Density Residential and within the Chaparral Area, which was given special attention in terms of its opportunities and constraints to development. Two Low Residential zoning districts were instituted through the City's Development Code, L1 and L2, with different development standards and lot sizes, to be distributed in the Chaparral Area based upon the area's constraints. The subject site is relatively fiat, with no natural slopes of 25% or greater. It is not within a natural drainage course, nor are there known biological resources on the site. In summary, the subject site does not exhibit any of the constraints characteristics contained in the General Plan. Additionally, there already exists L2 zoning to the north and east, and the proposed lots would be similar to adjacent residences and pad sites on Estero Court. Lastly, LM zoning is adjacent to the west, and the proposed L2 zoning would be an appropriate transition between the 7,200 square foot lot minimums to the west and the larger lot sizes to the south. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed zone change. The Parcel MaD The General Plan Chapanal Area details ten (10) spedtic requirements for the development of pad sites, including a Form SAN 53 statement from the Health Officer of Riverside County, slope gradient maximums and ddveway slope grades. The proposed map complies with all ten requirements, including the completion and acceptance of septic tank percolation testing by the County Department of Environmental Health. The property owner has improved Ormsby Road along the property line. Staff believes that with the constraints of the Chapanal Area studied and identified within the City's General Plan, suffident regulations for sensitive development of this area are in place. The eight years since the denial of the previous map signify a new time and new circumstances. The property is no longer owned by the developer of adjacent property. Sufficient access exists for the intensity of development generated by this project. It is Staff's recommendation that given the full compliance of the proposed map to the regulations in place for development, Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 can be approved, contingent upon City Council approval of the zoning amendment. The Waiver of Final MaD Under Section 9.12 of Ordinance 460, adopted by the City, the Director of Planning may waive a final map if enough information is available and the necessary conditions of the tentative map have been met. The applicant has installed the necessary street improvements and drainage facilities, has voluntarily paid Quimby Act fees for the provision of parks and recreation fadlities, and has had \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~.~.pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 3 percolation tests performed and approved by the Department of Environmental Health. Staff anticipates that the Director of Planning now has sufficient findings to waive the final map for Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000. Response to the Notice of Public Headng On May 7, 1999, staff received correspondence in opposition to the zone change from John and Roberta Martinez. Their home is on property southwest of the project site, on Ormsby Road. They are opposed to the ~ lot sizes in the "rural area of Santiago Estates and Los Ranchitos," which they assert are "2 acres or more" minimum lot sizes. However, in adopting the General Plan in 1993, the City Coundl determined a 1 acre minimum for Santiago Estates and a 2 ~ acre minimum for Los Ranchitos. Furthermore, the General Plan specifically studied this area, identified as the City's Chaparral Area, cognizant that "existing development consists of segmented lot patterns of varying sizes." As discussed previously the General Plan spelled out constraints and special development considerations in order to achieve appropriate transition down from the larger lots found in the Los Ranchitos and Santiago Estates areas. Staff believes that the proposed project meets that intent. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study has been prepared for this project which determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The proposed change of zone from Low Density Residential L1 (1 acre to 2.5 net acre lot sizes) to Low Density Residential L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre net lot sizes) is consistent with the General Plan designation which allows for the range of lot sizes from '~ acre to 2 acres. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 is consistent with the General Plan policies regarding the Chaparral Area of the City of which it is a part. The map is also consistent with the L2 zoning standards as listed in the Development Code. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The change of zone and parcel map lie within the Chaparral Area of the City, for which specific development standards were imposed due to the constraints in the area. The General Plan designation placed on the Chaparral Area allow for both L1 or L2 zoning. Since the change of zone and map comply with the development standards, and the site does not exhibit any of the constraints characteristics identified in the Chaparral Area, staff recommends approval of the project. ZONING AMENDMENT FINDINGS The proposed zoning amendment is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The General Plan designation allows for two zoning designations, L1 and L2. The proposed amendment is a change from L1 to L2 zoning. ~\TEMEC_FS201%DATAM:)EPTSM:~LANNING%STAFFRP'P,~pa97,STAFFRPT PC.doc 4 The proposed zoning amendment is not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposal complies with the General Plan adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS The proposed land division and the design or improvement of the project is compatible with the General Plan designation and consistent with the General Plan policies regarding the Chaparral Area. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Low Density Residential, 0.5 to 2 dwelling units per acre. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the City's General Plan, Development Code, Subdivision and Landscaping Ordinances. The project is consistent with these documents and conditions of approval have been placed on the project accordingly to assure that the development conforms to City Standards. The developer received review and approval of the subdivision from the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. A copy of an updated Form SAN53 from this agency is on file with the Planning Department. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. The existing General Telephone easement will not be affected by the proposed development· No other known easements exist on the property. The map as proposed, conforms to the logical development of the site, and is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and drculation are adequate for emergency vehicles. Both proposed parcels take access onto Estero Court, a publicly maintained roadway. The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site under permits from Riverside County in 1989. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~)EPTS~PLANNING~STAFFR~pa97.STAFFRPT PC,doc 5 Attachments: PC Resolution for the Change of Zone - Blue Page 7 PC Resolution for the Tentative Parcel Map - Blue Page 10 Exhibit A Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 14 Initial Study- Blue Page 18 Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 19 Correspondence Received - Blue Page 20 A. Letter dated May 5, 1999 from John & Roberta Martinez Exhibits - Blue Page 21 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map D. Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~)EPTS~.DLANNING\STAFFR~pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP CHANGE \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~.~.~.pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 7 ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT), TO CHANGE THE ZONE FROM L1 TO 1.2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO COURT AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011 WHEREAS, Ching G. Lee filed Planning Application No. PA97-0446, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0446 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescdbed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0446 on May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0446; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above redtations are true and con'ect and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA97- 0446, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed zoning amendment is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The General Plan designation allows for two zoning designations, L1 and L2. The proposed amendment is a change from L1 to L2 zoning. 2. The proposed zoning amendment is not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposal complies with the General Plan adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval for the parcel map have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRpTVI44pa97.STAFFRpT PC.doc 8 Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment), to change the zoning on a 1.07 acre parcel of land from L1 to L2 on property located at the southeast corner of Estero Court and Ormsby Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 945-070-011. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this nineteenth day of May, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the nineteenth day of May, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRP~,~,~,pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPTt,~,~,~,pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0444 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28000) TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.07 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO (2) PARCELS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO COURT AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011 WHEREAS, Ching G. Lee filed Planning Application No. PA97-0~.~.,! in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0444 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0444 on May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA97-0444; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. FindincJs. That the Temecula Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA97-0444, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460: A. The proposed land division and the design or improvement of the project is compatible with the General Plan designation and donsistent with the General Plan policies regarding the Chaparral Area. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Low Density Residential, 0.5 to 2 dwelling units per acre. Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 proposes two residential lots on 1.07 acres, and is consistent with these standards. B. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and Subdivision Ordinances. The project is consistent with these documents and conditions of approval have been placed on the project accordingly to assure that the development conforms to City Standards. The developer received review and approval of the subdivision from the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. A copy of an updated Form SAN53 from this agency is on file with the Planning Department. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRp~,~?.pa97.STAFFRpT PC.doc 11 C. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. The existing General Telephone easement will not be affected by the proposed development. No other known easements exist on the property. D. The map as proposed, conforms to the logical development of the site, and is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. Both proposed parcels take access onto Estero Court, a publicly maintained roadway. E. The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site under permits from Riverside County in 1989. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA97-0444 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) for the subdivision of a 1.07 acre parcel into two (2) parcels located at the southeast comer of Estero Street and Ormsby Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 945-070-011 ,subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRP'R444pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 12 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this nineteenth day of May, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairman I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the nineteenth day of May, 1999, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT~I44pa97.STAFFRpT PC.doc 13 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL %\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~)EPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRp'p,~.~pa97.STAFFRpT PC.doc 14 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0~.~.~. - Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000 Project Description: A subdivision of approximately 1.07 net acres into two (2) residential lots Assessor°s Parcel No,: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 945-070-011 (To be determined upon approval of PA97-0446) (To be determined upon approval of PA97-0446) PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements The tentative subdivision approval date is contingent upon City Council approval of the Zoning Amendment and the date that the implementing ordinance goes into effect. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon wdtten request, if made 30 days pdor to the expiration date. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'P.~,~.~.pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 15 action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. Conceptual landscape plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to landscape installation in front yards and slopes. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 10, Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 11. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with pdor to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. Prior to Approval of the Certificate of Compliance, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 12. The Developer shall vedfy that all comer monuments are set. Any missing monuments shall be reset and a Record of Survey or Comer Record filed with the Riverside County Surveyor's Office prior to approval of the Certificate of Compliance. Evidence of the existence of monuments and/or filing of the Record of Survey or Corner Record shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT None. \\TEMEC-FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~a,x.x. pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 16 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit 13. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation fees. OTHER AGENCIES 14. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated February 2, 1998, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water Distdct by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 15. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated April 6, 1999, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature \~TEMEC-FS201~DATA\DEPTS~DLANNING\STAFFRPT~,44pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 17 DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer City of Temecula Plannin Department 43200 ~usiness Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: ~,/:l R 0-l_ ~ Ladies and Gentlemen: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/275-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 7829.1 .Z:) O N l'4r HO The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The Distdct also does not plan check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and draina e facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master p an system and D str ct Area ~;ainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is .~rovided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the followin9 checked comments do not in any wa constitute or imply Distdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public healt~ and safety or any other such issue: t//This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards and Distr ct p an check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection add administrahve fees will be required. This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted ' Master Drainage Plan. The Distdct would consider acceptin ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standaCdgs, and District plan check and inspection wdl be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. V/' This project is located within the limits of the District's/vGJ~.K T/a, ~t5 k re y/~cuc.,~/'/'~t"~reYa Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; apph'Kca/bfe feesC~s'ould~e paid by cashier's check : or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of building or grading permits whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the t me of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination S stem (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other ~Y~al approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit o'r is shown to be exempt. If this pro'ect involves a Federal Emergen.%v Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood p a n then the City should require ~e applicant to rovide all studIes. calculations plans and other ~nformation required to meet FEMA requirements, and should ~rther require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project the City should require the ap licant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 A reement from the Ca~rnia Department o7 Fish and Game and a Clean ~Vater Act Section 404 Permit from the U.~. Army Corps of En ineers or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A g~lean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cert ticat on may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. ,('Oy~ Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Date: 84/06/lcJgcJ 86:54 ~5r""":i CAC (---, : PAGE 83 April 6, 1999 City of Temecula Planning Department P,O. BOX 9033 Temccula, CA 92539 ..... ATTN: Carole Donahoe: ]RE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28000 (Waiver Requested): PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 16705, BEING RECORDF. n IN BOOK 96 PAGES 39 AND 40 OF PARCEL MAPS ON FII .E IN THE OFFICE OF ~ COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF RIVERISDE, C/kl .r~ORNIA. ALSO BEING A PORTION OF TRR., I'ES~~ RANCHO. (2 LOTS) .' As this is a Schedule G subdivision .un. der the dete,/:tainatio~ of County of Riverside Ordimmcc 460.105, no water system is requircd. Normally then would have been a requirement that the foilowing statement be stamped on the recorded map in quarter inch high I~tcrs: NO WATER SYSTEM IS PROVIDED FOR THIS LAND DMSION AS OF ~ DATE OF RECORDATION OF THIS MAP. Since a wamr system h~ been idemtified for P~M. 25538, showing signatures of mylar improvemeat plans and sp~ifi.cations as approved by the water company and the Health Department and since a wa~ systt~n cur~ntly exists with domestic serviec, the "as-buile' peunaneat prints for P. M. 23000 wawr system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minLm_ul21 scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing, to the City Surveyor and County of Riverside Senior Public Health lq, n~neer, The prillt3 shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the mabx st th¢'.jlm. ction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Division 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the Cali/omia Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Ti~e 17, Chapter 5, and Genernl Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. , This Depaittuent will permit domestic sewage clisi~osal from the individual lots at this subdivision as per a percolation report submitted RGS Engineering, Project # 43-01, dated 11-03-94-as follows: For each 100 gallons of septic tank capacity, 55 sq.ft. of bottom area of leach line only is required. Limit size ofn:sid~nce to four(4) bcdrooras. Leach ~ areas arg designated on each paw, d. Depaxtme, nt of Envlxonmental Health staff shall inspect designed plot plan in ~dd PRIOR to any single family dwelling plans being submitted for plan check with City of Temecula Building and Safe~y. Engineer to verify trenches PRIOR TO ROCK PLACEMENT. : iT~jeSday April 6, 1~99 7:13am -- From - 84/8~/Zggg 8~: 54 955 -- Page PAGE City of Temecuh Page Two Aprn 6, 1999 When grading is required, the soils engineer must assume theoretical cuts, fills, compaction, etc., and perform the tests and borings at the necessary subsurface sewage disposal system depths. PRIOR TOANY GRADING, the soils engineer must provide a grading plan for review and approval which shall include and address the following: a) The proposed cuts and/or fills in the areas of subsurface sewage disposal system. b) The sewage system and it's 100°,4 expansion area, placed in natural undisturbed soil. c) The elevation of the individual building pads in refercnc~ to the elevation of the disposal system. On those projects where the grading plans are preprod by other than the person preparing the soils feas/bility report, a staterecur must be included on the grading plan submitted for review and approval with the soils engineers signature and seal as to the appwpriateness of the grading with regard to the conclusions and recommenehh_'ons set forth in the soils engineers feasibility report. ff the final grading exceeds the soils engineers estimate by mon~ than two fcet, additional reports may be required. At the completion of firm!. grading, or prior to any construction, the soils engineer of record shall review all subsurface sewage disposal data to include previous so~s feasibility reports and confirm with his signature and seal on the final grading plan, that the previous design parameters have been adhered to and that the subsurface sewage disposal systems reeommeod~f~ons remain valid with regard to previous requirement details for each sewage disposal system. A copy of the final grading plan~ on a scale'not smaller than 1"=40' max'5_'__m__~ with de~ailed subsurface sewage disposal data to include 1 00% expansion, shall be submitted for review and approval. The size of the septic tank and effluent disposal area shall be deteru~ned based upon the oc~paney of each individual lot, There shall be an unoccupied area on each lot where sewage disposal, as xequired above, may be installed in conformante with the current Uniform Plumbing Code, There shall be an additional unoccupied area equal to 100 percent of the above required sewage disposal system for sewage disposal installation in case of failure. However, sewage disposal systems are considered temporary and ff sewage lines of a sewer district become available, connection to the system should be made at that time. ~egor Dellenbaclx, Env~onmcntal Health Specialist IV, Land Use Program GD:gd (909) 955-8980 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 INITIAL STUDY \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'~444pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 18 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Existing Zoning Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Other public agencies whose approval is required Planning Application Nos. PA97-0444 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000), PA97-0445 (Waiver of Parcel Map No. 28000) and PA97- 0446 (Change of Zone) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400 Southeast corner of Estero Street and Ormsby Road Ching G. Lee, 2640 Meridian Street, Orange, CA 92867 Low Density Residential (.5 to 2 dwelling units per acre) Low Density Residential L1 (1 acre to 2.5 net acre lot sizes) To change the zoning of the property from Low Density Residential L1 (1 acre to 2.5 net acre lot sizes) to Low Density Residential L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre net lot sizes); to subdivide the 1.07 net acre site into two residential lots; and to request a waiver of the final map. The site is surrounded by residential development, with a single family subdivision across Ormsby to the west, large-lot single family homes and vacant lots to the north, east and south. Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, Rancho California Water District, Southern California Edison R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Land Use Planning X Population and Housing X X Geologic Problems X Water Air Quality Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources X Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance None Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature April 27, 1999 Date Carole K. Donahoe, AICP Printed name For: City of Temecula R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 2 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources a. Physically divide an established community? b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact X No Impact X X Comments: 1 .a. The proposed project is a two-lot parcel split that creates two half acre lots that will be similar in size to other lots on Estero Court. The proposed project will not physically divide an established community, but rather, act as a transition buffer between the tract subdivision to the west and the large lot estates to the south. No adverse environmental impact is anticipated. 1 .b. The proposed zone change, two-lot subdivision and waiver of final map are consistent with the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (.5 to 2 dwelling units per acre) which covers both L1 and L2 zoning. The project also complies with the General Plan policies regarding the Chaparral Area because of the following reasons: (1) the development provides the appropriate transition of density (2) the development is proposed upon a portion of the Chaparral Area that is relatively fiat (3) roadways are already installed (4) an updated SAN53 letter is on file from Environmental Health confirming the sewage disposal system for the site (5) retaining walls are not required for access (6) constraints of the Chaparral Area do not exist on the site. The project, as designed and conditioned, will mitigate potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 1 .c. The habitat conservation plan that applies to the site is for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat (SKR), for which mitigation fees are collected at the time of grading permit issuance. The site has been previously graded and improvements serving the site have already been installed. The applicant shall be conditioned to show evidence of SKR mitigation fee payment. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 3 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Potentially PotentiallySignificant UnlessLess Than ~ SignificantMitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Impact Incorporated Irapad Impact a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X X c. X Comments: 2.a. The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan. The project will allow for the construction of two single family dwellings, and due to this small scale of development, it will not be a significant contributor to population growth, and therefore will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. No significant effects are anticipated. 2.b. and c. The site is vacant and therefore no displacement of existing housing will occur. No significant effects are anticipated. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 4 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS, Would the project? i) Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AIquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X .X X X X Comments: 3.a.ii, iii, b., and d. There may be a potentially significant impact from seismic ground shaking, ground failure, liquefaction, soil erosion or expansive soils. There are no known fault hazard zones on the property. However, the project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Further, the project will be conditioned to provide soil reports prior to grading and recommendations contained in this report are followed during construction. The soils reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.a.i. There are no known or identified earthquake faults as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.c. The City's General Plan did not identify unstable soil, subsidence or liquefaction hazards in the vicinity of the subject site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.eo Septic sewage disposal systems are proposed for this project. An updated SAN53 letter from the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health indicates that percolation testing has been accomplished, and mitigation measures have been applied to the project based upon this testing. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 5 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a, Issues and Supporting information Sources Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of thesite or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood· hazard delineation map? · Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X X X X X X X j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 4.a.c. The project may have a potentially significant effect on water quality standards or affect siltation on- or off-site. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. 4.b., d., e. and f. The project will have less than a significant effect on the depletion of groundwater supplies, alteration of drainage patterns, contribution to runoff, or the degradation of water quality. Limited changes will occur in the quantity and quality of groundwaters. Additional surface runoff will occur because previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 6 hardscape and driveways. However, due to the minor scale of the project, these impacts will be considered insignificant. Furthermore, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a signficant impact on ground waters. 4.g., h., i. And j. The project site is not identified within the 100-year flood hazard area nor in an area subject to dam inundation, seiche, tsunami or mudflow. Therefore, there is little likelihood that the project wile expose housing or people to risk of loss or injury. No significant impacts are anticipated. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or. air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact X No Impact X X X X Comments: 5.a., b. and c. The project will not conflict with applicable air quality plans nor violate air quality or pollution standards. The project proposes two dwelling units on 1.07 acres, which is well below the 166 unit threshold for potentially significant air quality impact established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 5.d. There are no known sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity. The project occupants will not generate significant pollutants. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 5.e. The project may create objectionable odors during the construction of residential structures. However, these impacts are anticipated to be of short duration. With only two residences proposed, the impacts are considered less than significant. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99,doc 7 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a, eo Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emergency access? Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact X X X Comments: 6.ao There will be an increase in vehicle trips on adjacent streets, but due to the minor scale of development, the increase is considered less than significant. According to the League of California Cities, total vehicle trip ends generated per day from single family homes is 9 per dwelling unit. The project calls for two dwellings, or a total of 18 trip ends per day. 6.b. The project is similar in nature to adjacent residences which contribute less than a five percent (5%) increase in existing volumes of traffic. No further traffic studies were required for this project. The developer of either parcel will be required to contribute traffic signal and public facility development impact fees prior to the issuance of any building permits. No significant impacts are anticipated. 6.d., e. and g. The project design will not negatively impact emergency access, safe traffic conditions nor efforts to promote alternative transportation. As a requirement of the project, the developer improved Ormsby Road, and thereby contributed to the availability of emergency access and safe traffic conditions in the neighborhood. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: ao bo co Issues and Supporting Information Sources Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact X X X X X X Comments: 7.a. thru f. The project site was rough graded and compacted in 1989, and a report from W. C. Hobbs Consulting Engineer describing same dated November 17, 1989 is on file. A Biological Survey for Tentative Tract Map No. 25607, completed on February 14, 1990 by Donald D. Sutton, Ph.D., confirms that the site has been graded and cleared more than once. The report indicates that no sensitive, threatened or endangered plant species are expected to be found in the vicinity of the project site, nor is it a suitable corridor for wildlife movement because medium to dense development along Pauba Road has blocked movement across the property. The project will not have a significant impact on endangered species, riparian habitat, wetlands, wildlife corridors, or conservation plans. R:\CEQA\444pa97,CEQA initial study 99.doc 9 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X Comments: 8.a. and b. The project will not result in the loss of available, known mineral resources nor in the loss of an available, locally-important mineral resource recovery site. The State Geologist has classified the City of Temecula a classification of MRZ-3a, containing areas of sedimentary deposits which have the potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are determined as not containing deposits of significant economic value based upon available data in reports prepared in accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 10 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting information Sources Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Crate a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X fo Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant dsk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X X X X X Comments: 9.a., b., c. and d. The project will not cause a significant hazard to the public through the use or release of hazardous substances since none are proposed in the request. Large quantities of hazardous or toxic materials will not be associated with this use. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the project and has no objections. 9.e. and f. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public or private airstrip. No significant impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal. 9.g. The project will take access from maintained public streets and will therefore not impede emergency response or evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 9.h. The Temecula area is surrounded by rolling foothills and mountains and is accordingly at risk of wildland fire. The project is located within the Chaparral Area which is characterized by moderately sloped R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 11 hillsides and segmented lot patterns of varying sizes. The project will be required to satisfy fire flow requirements, street widths, design and fuel modification requirements, as established by the fire and police departments. With mitigation measures in place, the project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk to wildland fires. 10. NOISE. Would the project result in: ao Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X X X X X Comments: 10.a. The project may result in an increase to existing noise levels. The site is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in noise increases over the long run. However, long-term noise generated by this project would be similar to existing and proposed uses in the area. Due to the small scale of the project (two residences), the impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. 10.b., e and f. The project site is not near uses with excessive groundborne noise levels, nor is it near airport land uses. No exposure to excessive noise levels from these uses are anticipated. 10.d. The project may result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying. However, this source of noise from construction of the project will be of short duration and therefore would not be considered significant. Furthermore, construction activity will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity in residential areas. No significant impacts are anticipated. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 12 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fire protection? X c. Police protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public facilities? X Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact X No Impact Comments: 11 .a., b., c., e. and f. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally increase the need for some services. However, the project will contribute its fair share to the maintenance or provision of services from these entities. Due to its small scale, less than significant impacts are anticipated. 11 .d. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be mitigated through the payment of applicable School Fees. Less than signficant impacts are anticipated. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 13 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X X X X Comments: 12.a., b. and e. The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.c. The project will not result in the need for new storm water drainage facilities. The drainage system for the project site is already in place and drainage fees are required by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated. 12.d. The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, the Final Environmental Impact · Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both Eastern Municipal Water District and Rancho California Water District have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their service areas." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.f. and g. The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waster created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 14 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X No Impact X X Comments: 13.a., b. and c. The project will not substantially degrade a scenic vista, resources, or visual character. The proposed residential development of the two parcels will comply with the City's Code requirements governing such development, and will be similar in nature to surrounding single family residences. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.d. The project could potentially impact nighttime views by creating new sources of light or glare. However, the project will be conditioned to comply with Ordinance No. 655, an ordinance regulating light pollution within the City. After mitigation measures are in place, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 15 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially PotentiallySignificant UnlessLess Than SignificantMitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 14.a. through d. The project site has been previously graded and compacted. No significant impacts to cultural resources are anticipated as a result of the project. R:\CEQA\444pa97,CEQA initial study 99.doc 16 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X Comments: 15.a. and b. The project developer has voluntarily paid Quimby Fees collected by the Temecula Community Services District to mitigate any significant impact to recreation facilities of the City. No significant impacts are anticipated. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 17 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulativel~/ considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X X Comments: 16.a. Due to the existing condition of the site, having been previously graded and compacted, the project does not have the potential to degrade habitat, plant or animal communities, or historical resources. 16.b. There are potentially cumulative effects from the project. However, due to the small scale of development (two residential lots), the cumulative impact is not considerable. 16.c. The project does not have the potential to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The project could be considered an infill project within a partially developed residential area. Development is anticipated to be similar to other construction in the neighborhood. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 18 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and .adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. R:\CEQA\444pa97.CEQA initial study 99.doc 19 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 MITIGATION MONITORING STUDY \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTt,~pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 19 Land Use Plannin.q General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Mitigation Monitoring Program Planning Application No. PA97-0~?.~ (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy or regulation. Ensure that development of the site complies with Conditions of Approval Grading plans shall be submitted for review and approval. Prior to the issuance of grading permits. Department of Public Works and Planning Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy or regulation. Ensure that development of the site complies with Conditions of Approval A Consistency Check process shall be conducted. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Department of Building & Safety and Planning Department. Geoloqic Problems General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking. Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards. A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. Building pads shall be cortffied by a registered Civil Engineer. Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Expose people to impacts from seismic ground failure, including liquefaction. Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards. A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer. Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department. R:\CEQA~444pa97.Mitigation Monitoring Pgm.doc 1 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Expose people to risks to life or property due to expansive soils. Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform Building Code. Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety Department for approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Building and Safety Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Install septic tanks where soils are incapable of adequately supporting their use. Ensure that soils are prepared based upon percolation testing. The site shall be inspected during construction for compliance with the recommendations from approved percolation tests. Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department. Water General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: The project will violate water quality or waste discharge requirements An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP). General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: The project will substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP). R:\CEQA~t44pa97.Miljgation Monitoring Pgm.doc 2 Transportation/Circulation General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Bioloi3ical Resources General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Hazardous Materials General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion. Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements and traffic impacts. Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Building and Safety Department. Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion. Payment of Development Impact Fee for traffic signal mitigation. Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of building permit. Building and Safety Department. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds). Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat. Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Department of Public Works and Planning Department. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss involving wildland Payment of Development Impact Fee for Fire Mitigation. Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of building permit. Building & Safety Department. R:\CEQAV144pa97.Mitigation Monitoring Pgm.doc 3 General Impact: Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss involving wildland fires. Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Ensure adequate fire flow, street widths and fuel modification requirements am met. Review of construction plans for compliance with Fire and Building Codes. Prior to the issuance of building permit. Building & Safety Department and Fire Department. Noise General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Expose people to a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels. Construction activity shall comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity in residential areas, City inspectors shall periodically monitor the construction site to ensure compliance. During active construction of the site. Building & Safety Department and Department of Public Works. Public Services General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools. No significant impacts are anticipated. Payment of School Fees. Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley Unified School District. R:\CEQAt~pa97,Mi~gation Monitoring Pgm.doc 4 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: AESTHETICS General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities, including roads. Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic impacts, and public facilities. Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits. Building and Safety Department. The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare that could affect the Palomar Observatory. Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance No. 655. Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Building & Safety Department. R:\CEQA~,44pa97.Mitigation Monitoring Pgm.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CORRESPONDENCE \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA%DEPTS\PLANNING%STAFFRp'I'~t44pa97.STAFFRpT PC.doc 20 From the de~k o! ...... JOHN MARTINEZ May 5, 1999 City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Calif. 92590 MAY 0 ? ~Y ~.E. Dlann:i. ng' ApDlication#p~ 97-0~4 & PA 97-0446 Gentleman, As being a Home owner across the street from the proposed Application to change the zone, My wife and I are against this change, for a couple of reasons. One the Los Ranchitos are 2 acres or more and the Santiago Estates are 2 acres or more, why should this rural are should be any different? About 4 or 5 years ago, the change the size of the lots from 2.5 acres to 1 to 1.25 acres, we think this is going to far. Yours Truly, ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXHIBITS \\TEMEC-FS201\DATA~)EPTS~DLANNING~STAFFRP~-a-~pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc 21 CITY OF TEMECULA · CASE NO. - PLANNING APPLICATIONS PA97-0444 AND PA97-0446 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 VICINITY MAP R:\STAFFRP'I~444pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - L1 EXISTING; L2 PROPOSED EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (.5 TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) CASE NO. - PLANNING APPLICATIONS PA97-0444 AND PA97..0446 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 R:\STAFFRPT~444pa97.STAFFRPT PC,doc CITY OF TEMECULA VZCZNZTY HAP R TENT A T I VE.. P ARCEL MAP NO. IN THE CITY OF TENECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING AI'Ft, ICATIOH / ~/ 28000 CASE NO. - PLANNING APPLICATIONS PA97-0444 AND PA97-0446 EXHIBIT - D TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28000 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 R:\STAFFRPT~444pa97.STAFFRPT PC.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM MAY 19, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING'~STAFFRPT\446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 7 PI~]]WG C(~{MISSIONMI_~S -)fAY 19, 1999 Fer ~nmmissioner Soltysiak, Planning Manager clarified the Specific Plan with m0~.'d tu its nonspeQfm~!l]r te ,~v~=rall signage, relaying that the Specific- DI3fl ~3Fovided general provisions (i.e., specifying the na~l~,¢r of ~ions p~r development). At this time vt,!~e yule was taken reflecting unanimous denfal ur the project, as pr.~pu~=d. - Planning3 A.oDlication No. PA97-044 ITentative Parcel mad No. 28000) and Plannina Application No. PA97-0446 {Chan¢ie of Zone) Request to subdivide 1.07 net acres into two residential lots, and to change the zoning of the property from Low Density Residential L1 (1 acre to 2.5 acres lot size) to Low Density Residential L2 (112 acre to I acre lot size). RECOMMENDATION it is ~ecommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. Commissioner Soltysiak advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this Agenda Item, and therefore left the dais. By way of maps, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record); highlighted the current zoning in the adjacent area; relayed that staff had received three letters in opposition to the project, one pdor to the headng which were distributed to the Commission; noted that the concerns expressed were, as follows; alteration of the rural character of the community, the threat of grading redudng the equestrian trails, the potential of decreased property values, noise, increased traffic, and dust pollution; relayed that staff has advised that this particular project would be an appropriate use for the area of discussion; for Commissioner Fahey, clarified that the previous addressed issues of concems (i.e., roads, septic, water, and emergency access) have been addressed; and for Commissioner Naggar, relayed that the proposed project is for the development of two residential lots on 1.07 acres. Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, for Commissioner Fahey, spedred in detail the improvements in the area of discussion; in response to Commissioner Naggar's comments, regarding the letter submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Gosser (per supplemental agenda material) relayed that the CC&R's for this particular site expired three years ago; noted that the negative eroding effect in the area are most likely due to the natural sandy soil, relaying that due to the dense landscaping, this particular project would not have significantly impact the erosion; and provided additional clarification with regard to the provision of utilities. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project: g Mr. Wilson Nolan ~ Ms. Brook Nolan 30250 Santiago Road 30250 Santiago Road The aforementioned individuals voiced their concerns, as follows: That the quality of life would be affected detrimentally Recommended that the spad0usness of the area be preserved Voice concem regarding the potential for a continued progression of future zoning changes That the habitat of wildlife would be disturbed The following individual spoke in favor of the project: z2 Mr. Dennis Marchand representing Padtic Capital Investments (located on the adjoining parcel) The aforementioned individual expressed his comments, as follows: ,,' Located their business adjacent the property in discussion due to the fact that this particular project was proposed Commended the existing improvements (i.e., concrete curbing and gutters) · -' Relayed that this project was an asset to the area In response to community comments, Mr. Markham specified the adjacent site plans, noting that there would most likely not be any furlher subdivisions along Santiago Road; noted the improvements this project would provide to the area; and. relayed for the record that the applicant had received two letters in favor of the project that would be submitted to the clerk. Chairman Guerdero closed the public headng at this time. Commissioner Fahey advised that the applicant has adequately addressed the previous expressed concerns for this particular site. For community informational purposes, Commissioner Webster advised that there were ten specific requirements in order for development to take place in this particular area, noting that although half-acre lots are permitted in this area, that it would not mandate the continuation of subdividing lots. Commissioner Naggar expressed concurrence with previous Commission comments, relaying that he would ?,upport the project. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to Resolution No. 99-012 recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and adopt Resolution No. 99-013 approving Planning Application No. PA97-O~.~?. (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subjed to the attached Conditions of Approval; and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application Nos. PA97-0446 and PA97-C~.~?.; and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No, PA97-0446 and PA97-~.~.~,, RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT), TO CHANGE THE ZONE FROM L1 TO L2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO COURT AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011 RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0~.~.*. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28000) TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.07 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO (2) PARCELS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO COURT AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011 The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with the exception Commissioner Soltysiak who abstained, ,,,,,Plannino Application No. 99-0160 to amend the Specific Plan to modify parking standards. :)N !t is mended by the Planning Department the Planning Commission that the City Council Specific Pan Amendment 99. By way of overheads, Hogan the staff report (of record); relayed that the proposal would public parking in the Toudst Retail Core and The Community }port Districts in Old Town, noting that the City's Redevelopment Agency would to provide centralized parking in Old Town; advised that staff would the parking in Old Town; for Commissioner Naggar, advised rationale f the amendment would be to induce economic growth; noted that sl of the opin that the lack of on-site parking would not negatively affect b relaying that the a ndment would not prohibit on- site parking if a m~r t desired to maintain on-sl parking; in response to Commissioner Soltysi s comments, relayed that although ff is in the process of developing additio off-street parking that there is no current ter Plan addressing the sipecificity . xact location of future parking lots; a. nd noted th e City would be tion with reg to the 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING~,STAFFRPT\446pa97.CC zone chg.doc 8 From the desk of ...... (" JOHN MARTI~("~5 May 5, 1999' City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Calif. 92590 R.E. Planning Application#PA 97-044 & PA 97-0446 Gentleman, As being a Home owner across the street from the proposed Application to change the zone, My wife and I are against this change, for a couple of reasons. One the Los Ranchitos are 2 acres or more and the Santiago Estates are 2 acres or more, why should this rural are should be any different? About 4 or 5 years ago, the change the size of the lots from 2.5 acres to 1 to 1.25 acres, we think this is going to far. Yours Truly, To: Planning Director for the City of Temecula May 17, 1999 Subject: Planning application No. PA97-0444 & PA97-0446 Sir, My name is Denny Gosser and my wife's name is Sue. We live at 30680 Santiago Road, Temecula, CA 92592. We would like to go on record as being opposed to the splitting of the lots and rezoning as described in planning application No. PA97-0444 & PA97-0446. We are opposed for the following reasons. · CC&R's that we received for this area require that any splitting of property must be approved by a committee located at P.O. Box 2095,. Hemet, CA 92343. ( Doc# 7732 refers to Book 81, Pages 83 & 84) 8/12/74 · By allowing more homes to be built on smaller lots, it will create more noise and dust pollution, traffic problems, and increase the existing erosion problems on Santiago Road. · De -valuation of existing homes in the area. With the smaller homes on smaller lots it will provide lower value for "Comps" in this area thus de- valuation of our properties which are existing. · Water, electric, gas, telephone, cable TV and fire protection were installed along Pauba Road several years ago. When they were designed the intent was for 2.5 to 5 acre lots to be located in this area. By splitting the lots up this will require at least extra funds to do a feasibility study to see if the existing system is capable of sustaining all of the future home sites. It could require funds to up grade existing facilities for the city. · This area is set up as an equestrian area with the existing homeowners. What assurance do we have that if smaller parcels are allowed in the area that our riding trails and love for horses won't come under attack from the new homeowners, and will they try to force us to give up the reason we moved here in the first place. We have been through two battles with the city of Huntington Beach involving homeowners moving horses out, and as a property owner here I will fight to keep our dght to have horses at home. As smaller developments emerge they seem to ban together to get the big guy who has been there for a while because there are more of them with a common interest, thus being able to remove what was there before them. · What environmental impact studies have been done and how are the endanger species being protected? If you have any questions I can be contacted at 909-676-5854. We have not spoken to any of the other homeowners except Mrs. G. Moore at 30600 Santiago Road, and she agrees with us. Please keep me informed of any 'building plans in this area. en:ely' ue Gosse~"~r ~ Wilson and Brook Nolan wenolan(i, wnolan.com 30250 Santiago Road Temecula, CA 92592 Phone 909.694.8876 FAX 909.491.0372 May 18, 1999 Hand Carried Ron Guerriero, Chairman City of Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Planning Application No. PA97-0466 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) and Planning Application No. PA97-0444 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28000) Dear Chairman Guerriero and Planning Commission Members: We are opposed to the above referenced proposed zoning change and attendant tentative parcel map. We live on Santiago Road, just around the comer from the Project. This project would negatively impact the character of our large lot community. We purchased our home and moved in last August. Our home purchase decision was based, in part, on the zoning existent at that time. We looked east of town and found several properties we liked, however x;ve also wanted our two teenage children to be close to their friends. After much soul searching, we decided on Santiago Road with the large lots located in town. Our purchase decision was reliant upon the assumption the lot size then existent would continue. Permitting a higher density would have an effect on us, the neighborhood and the City of Temecula. We believe we are entitled to rely on zoning to protect the character of our neighborhood.· We disagree with the presumption that a reduced lot size would make an appropriate transition between LM and VL zones. We believe the existing L-1 zones interspersed with the L~2 zones provides for a tasteful and functional transition between higher and lower density residential development. We look forward to your Commission's denial of this inappropriate Project. We believe the Commission has the opportunity to protect the unique qualities of our neighborhood and the City of Temecula by denying this Project. Respectfully: Wilson E. Nolan Brook Nolan ~.n.:~y ~ '~ t899 ITEM 26 APPROVAl,: CITY ATTORNEY ,~ DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER ~/ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA99-0104 (Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 263) Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) THAT REQUESTS AN INCREASE IN THE HEIGHT OF THE THEATRE MARQUEE FROM 12 FEET TO 26 FEET WITHIN THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263, BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK BACKGROUND: On May 19, 1999 the Planning Commission considered the application by Superior Electrical Advertising to amend the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, in order to allow Edwards Cinemas to erect a freestanding marquee sign at the easternmost entrance from Winchester Road at the Promenade Mall, at a height of 26 feet. The proposed sign is designed to be similar to the Mall's primary entrance sign, in materials, architectural features, colors and height, that will be erected in the median at the western driveway. H, owever, Section IV.E.4. of the specific plan which governs development at the Mall limits the height of the theatre monument/marquee sign to twelve feet (12'). ANALYSIS: The applicant's rationale for the request is the location of the cinema at the rear of the Mall site, and the ability of motorists to read the marquee. The Planning Commission considered the request in relation to all Mall street signage, all cinema marquees on the building, other development signage on Winchester Road, and in relation to its conformity with the City's Sign Ordinance. Additionally, the Commission heard testimony from a resident in opposition to the proposal due to the negative visual effect and potential to cause a safety hazard from motorists. \\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\STAFFRFr\ 104pa99. CC. doc 1 FINDINGS: In recommending denial of the project to the Council, the Planning Commission made the following findings: The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is not consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. The Specific Plan was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. Given that the amendment would allow signage above the maximum allowed by the Specific Plan for marquee signage at the site, the amendment is considered inconsistent. The Commission determined that there were no circumstances presented by the applicant that would compel the Comrdission to change the Specific Plan which is well thought out in design and intent. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan allows marquee signage at the site as high as twelve feet (12'), while the proposed amendment is to twenty-six feet (26'). The Specific Plan was found to be compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community, and therefore the amendment would be incompatible. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed street marquee sign will be similar in design, construction, colors, materials used and height to the proposed free-standing sign for the Mall, also located along Winchester Road. 4. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use development. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 will not ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed d~velopment in the surrounding neighborhood. A signage program for the mall was studied, approved and included within the Specific Plan to achieve a desirable character for development. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 does not conform to this program. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: City Council Resolution No. 99-__ denying Planning Application No. PA99-0104 - Page 3 City Council Ordinance No. 99-__ approving Planning Application No. PA99-0104 (Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 263) - Page 7 Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 19, 1999- Page 10 Planning Commission Minutes from May 19, 1999 - Page 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-__ denying Planning Application No. PA99-0104 - Page 12 \\T EMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\ 104pa99. CC. doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\104pa99.CC.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) THAT REQUESTS AN INCREASE IN THE HEIGHT OF THE THEATRE MARQUEE FROM 12 FEET TO 26 FEET WITHIN THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263, BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK WHEREAS, Superior Electrical Advertising filed Planning Application No. PA99-0104, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0104 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0104 on May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of Planning Application No. PA99-0104; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA99-0104 on July 13, 1999, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA99-0104; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA99-0104; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. The City Council, in denying Planning Application No. PA99-0104 (Specific Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following findings A. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is not consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. The Specific Plan was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. Given that the amendment would allow signage above the maximum allowed by the Specific Plan for marquee signage at the site, the amendment is considered inconsistent. The Commission determined that there were no circumstances presented by the applicant that would compel the Commission to change the Specific Plan which is well thought out in design and intent. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\104pa99.CC.doe 4 B. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan allows marquee signage at the site as high as twelve feet (12'), while the proposed amendment is to twenty-six feet (26'). The Specific Plan was found to be compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community, and therefore the amendment would be incompatible. C. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed street marquee sign will be similar in design, construction, colors, materials used and height to the proposed free-standing sign for the Mall, also located along Winchester Road. ' D. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use development. E. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 will not ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. A signage program for the mall was studied, approved and included within the Specific Plan to achieve a desirable character for development. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 does not conform to this program. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\104pa99.CC.doc 5 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this thirteenth day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the thirteenth day of July, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk \XTEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\ 104pa99. CC. doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~,I04pa99.CC .doc 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER), AMENDING SECTION IV.E.4., TO ALLOW A 26-FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT MARQUEE, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 91,0- '130-052, -053 AND -054 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application is hereby approved and ratified as follows: 4. Theaters and Special Event Facilities Identification and program information for theaters and special event facilities may be provided by theater monuments and/or marquee signs. These signs, if provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displaying the name of the theater, auditorium, hotel or special event facilities and, if desired, may also include a changeable section accommodating program information. These signs may be either attached directly to the building or erected as free-standing signs. These signs shall not extend above the height of the predominant roofline of the building if attached directly to the building. Freestanding signs cannot exceed a maximum of twelve foot (12') twenty-six feet (26:) in height. These signs may be illuminated internally, however, the permanent portion must have an opaque background, with only the message portion illuminated, and setup for changeable letters. Section 2. Notice of Adoption. within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. Section 4. The City Coundl in making a Determination of Consistency-with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Specific Plan Amendment does not require further environmental analysis because pylon signage along Winchester Road at a maximum height of 36 feet was considered and approved under the Specific Plan. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\104pa99.CC.doc 8 Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this thirteenth day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the thirteenth day of July, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRFI~104pa99.CC.doc 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 19, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS20 I\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\ 104pa99. CC. doc 10 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 19, 1999 Planning Application No. PA99-0104 (Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 263) Prepared By: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 99- recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0104 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; MAKE a Determination of Consistency with a Project for Which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was Previously Certified, and Findings that a subsequent EIR is not required ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0104 DIRECT Staff to approve the twenty-six foot (26') free- standing entertainment marquee for the Edwards Cinema at The Promenade Mall, in accordance with Exhibits E - Site Plan, F - Sign Elevations, H - Landscape Plan and I - Color and Matedal Board APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Edwards Theater Circuit, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Michael Gray, Superior Electrical Advertising PROPOSAL: To amend Specific Plan No. 263 (Temecula Regional Center), Section IV. E. 4., allowing the theater to erect a freestanding marquee sign 26 feet in height. LOCATION: At the eastemmost entrance from Winchester Road to the Temecula Promenade Mall, within the ddve aisle median. EXISTING ZONING: SP (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan) \\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNI NG~STAFFRP'I~104pa99.PC.doc 1 SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: CC (Community Commercial) BP (Business Park) SP (Campos Verdes Specific Plan) CC (Community Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: Not Requested GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CC (Community Commerdal), PI (Public/Institutional Facilities) and PO (Professional Office) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant, Mall under construction SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Commercial center (Costco and Winchester Marketplace) Vacant Vacant Commercial center (Palm Plaza) BACKGROUND Edwards Theater Circuit, Inc. received approval from the Planning Commission on February 3, 1999 to construct and operate the 15-screen, 87,962 square foot motion picture complex within the Promenade Mall. On March 17, 23 and 29 the applicant's representative submitted portions of the specific plan amendment application. The Apdl 15, 1999 Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was cancelled and staff worked with the representative by phone to complete the project application. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed specific plan amendment is a request to modify the height limitation for theaters as noted in Section IV.E.4. of Specific Plan No. 263 which governs development at the Mall. Existing language is as follows: 4. Theaters and Special Event Facilities Identification and program information for theaters and special event facilities may be provided by theater monuments and/or marquee signs. These signs, if provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displaying the name of the theater, auditorium, hotel or spedal event fadlities and, if desired, may also include a changeable section accomodating program information. These signs may be either attached directly to the building or erected as free-standing signs. These signs shall not extend above the height of the predominant roo~ine of the building if attached directly to the building. Freestanding signs cannot exceed a maximum of twelve feet (12') in height. These signs may be illuminated intemally, however, the permanent portion must have an opaque background, with only the message portion illuminated. \\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 2 The proposal requests that the last two sentences be amended to read as follows: Freestanding signs cannot exceed a maximum of twolvo foot (12') twenty-six feet (26~) in height. These signs may be illuminated internally, however, the permanent portion must have an opaque background, with only the message portion illuminated, and setup for changeable letters. ANALYSIS Location Considerations The Edwards Cinema building itself is located at the southeast end of the Mall behind Sears, approximately 1,500 feet from Winchester Road. Winchester Road (also known as State Highway 79 South) is an urban artedal 6-lane highway, with a 134-foot right-of-way and with two additional 25-foot transportation corridor easements on both sides. Staff feels that the high speed nature of Winchester Road and its roadway width are factors requiring special consideration of this amendment by the Commission. ComDatibilitv Considerations The Mall has proposed a twenty-six foot (26') high free-standing pdmary entrance sign for the Promenade Mall in the median at the western driveway. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan allows one primary entry sign to be at a maximum height of thirty-six feet (36'). The Mall free- standing sign is also before the Commission on May 19, 1999. The proposed Edwards Cinema sign is similar in design, architectural features, colors and materials used, and height. Other MarQuee Signs within the City There are two other existing street marquees for movie theaters in the City. The Tower Plaza ' marquee fronts Ynez Road on a relatively level portion of the center adjacent to the bank, and stands twelve feet (12') high. The other marquee is on the opposite side of Ynez Road at the middle entrance to the Rancho California Towne Center. The change in grade on the sloped driveway varies the height of the sign from approximately 12 to 26 feet. The third movie complex, Temeku at the Palm Plaza (southwest comer of Winchester Road and Ynez Road) does not have a street marquee. Due to its location adjacent to Interstate 15, Temeku has their marquee on the back wall of the building. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project site has been subject to extensive environmental review. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and an Addendure to the EIR were prepared and certified for the Temecula Regional center Specific Plan. An Initial Environmental Study (IES) was prepared by staff for Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan). Since pylon signage along Winchester Road were considered and approved under this development plan, staff determined that no further environmental analysis is required at this time. \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTS~oLANNING~STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 3 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The project is proposing an amendment to the development standards govemed by the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The application for the amendment is consistent with the policies and procedures for such an amendment outlined in the City's General Plan and Development Code. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The high speed nature and width of Winchester Road warrants spedal consideration with regards to street marquees. The design, construction, colors and materials of the proposed marquee is consistent and compatible with the free-standing sign for the Promenade Mall. The marquee will reflect all facets of the proposed Mall signage and complete their presence along Winchester Road. Staff therefore recommends approval of the project. FINDINGS The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specffic Plan No. 263 is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan does allow other signage at the site as high as thirty-six feet (36'), while the proposed amendment is to twenty-six feet (26'). The Specific Plan was found to be compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community, and therefore the amendment would be compatible as well. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. The Specific Plan was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. Given that the amendment would allow signage below the maximum allowed the by Specific Plan for other signage at the site, the amendment can also be considered consistent. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed street marquee sign will be similar in design, construction, colors, materials used and height to the proposed free-standing sign for the Mall, also located along Winchester Road. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a deviation from the proposed signage for the Mall. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 does not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report No. 340 for Specific Plan No. 263. ~\TEMEC_FS201~)ATA~DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 4 Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9 Exhibits - Blue Page 12 B. C. D. E. f. g. H. Vicinity Map Zoning Map General Plan Map Site Plan Location Plan Elevations Landscape Plan Color and Matedal Board - Available at the Public Hearing \~TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTS'~DLANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS201~)ATA\DEPTSM~LANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104 (AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263), THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER, SECTION IV. E. 4., TO ALLOW A 26-FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT MARQUEE, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910-130- 052, -053 AND -054 WHEREAS, Edwards Theatre Circuit, Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA99-0104, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0104 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0104 on May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0104; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0104, makes the following findings: 1 ) The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan does allow other signage at the site as high as thirty-six feet (36'), while the proposed amendment is to twenty-six feet (26'). The Specific Plan was found to be compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community, and therefore the amendment would be compatible as well. 2) The proposed Zoning Amendment to Spedtic Plan No. 263 is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. The Specific Plan was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. Given that the amendment would allow signage below the maximum allowed the by Specific Plan for other signage at the site, the amendment can also be considered consistent. \\TEMEC_FS201~DATAM:)EPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 7 3) The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed street marquee sign will be similar in design, construction, colors, materials used and height to the proposed free-standing sign for the Mall, also located along Winchester Road. 4) The proposed Zoning Amendment to Spedtic Plan No. 263 will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a deviation from the proposed signage for the Mall. 5) The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 does not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report No. 340 for Specific Plan No. 263. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project site has been subject to extensive environmental review. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and an Addendum to the EIR were prepared and certified for the Temecula Regional center Specific Plan. An Initial Environmental Study (IES) was prepared by staff for Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan). Since pylon signage along Winchester Road were considered and approved under this development plan, staff determined that no further environmental analysis is required at this time. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0104 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan), to amend the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, allowing a street marquee sign at a height of twenty-six feet (26') on property located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910-130-062,-053 and -054. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this nineteenth day of May, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the nineteenth day of May, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FS201~)ATA~DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 8 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTSM:>LANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc 9 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA99-0104 -Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan Project Description: To amend Specific Plan No. 263 (Temecula Regional Center), Section IV. E. 4., allowing the theater to erect a freestanding marquee sign 26 feet in height Development Impact Fee Category: None Assessor's Parcel No. Approval Date: 910-130-052, -053 AND -054 (To be determined by City Council Action) PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. The applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan No. 263 and its amendments unless superceded by these conditions. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program for Specific Plan No. 263. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), approved Exhibit "E" (Location Plan), and approved Exhibit "F" (Elevations, contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "G" (Landscape Plan). Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The \\TEMEC_FS201~)ATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~104pa99.PC.doc 10 continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of approved colors and materials and with Exhibit "G" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Planning Manager. Material Color Tile band primary color Tile band secondary color #1072-A Chateau-Dusk Colonia-Dusk Cobalt Blue or Colonia-1054-Q or Chateau 808-E or Chateau Light Taupe or Chateau 801-M/Nautical Stone veneer Adequin di Canterra Paint colors Matthews polyurethane sign paints #62C-2T, #16B-4D, #19C-4D, #71A-1A, White, Black, #34C-1 P, #70C-4D or painted to match PMS 134, 577, 270, 116, or 299 Prior to the Issuance of Permits The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G" , or "H" (Site Plan, Location Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, or Color and Matedal Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and submit five (5) full size copies to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of City Ordinance No. 655 regarding light pollution. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name \\TEMEC_FS201~DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC,doc 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP~104pa99.PC.doc 12 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 VICINITY MAP R:\STAFFRP~104pa99.PC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA ./:.' '-~¥ OOO~ CASE NO. -- PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT B DESIGNATION - SP (SPECIFIC PLAN) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 ZONING MAP R:\STAFFRPT~104pa99.PC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. -- PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION - CC (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL), PI (PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL FACILTIES) AND PO (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE) GENERAL PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 R:\STAFFRP~104pa99. PC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA WINCHESTER ROAD M \/ CASE NO. -- PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT- D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 SITE PLAN R:\STAFFRP~I 04pa99. PC,doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - - PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT- E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 LOCATION PLAN R:\STAFFRP']R104pa99oPC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA 14',-0 ' Cabinet 9'-0' CASE NO. -- PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT- F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 ELEVATIONS R:\STAFFRPT~I 04pa99.PC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA ~ IRIPlOIDE5 5 ~N., 2'.-~" 0."-., D{;t,el..i fe, D~ WINCHESTE CASE NO. -- PA99-0104 (ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN) EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MAY 19, 1999 LANDSCAPE PLAN R:\STAFFRP'R104pa99.PC.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM MAY 19, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\I04Pa99.CC.doc 11 It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the project was well designed, and that the project should move forward, as proposed. 5. Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that she was available to answer any questions regarding the agenda material with respect to the Dimctor's Headng Case Update. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 6. Plannina Application No. PA99-0104 (Specific Plan Amendment) Request to amend the Specific Plan No. 263 (Temecula Regional Center) allowing the theater to erect a freestanding marquee sign 26 feet (26') in height. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. By way of overhead and maps, Senior Planner Fagan presented the staff report (per agenda material); relayed that the request to amend the Specific Plan was for the purpose of permitting the proposed twenty six foot (26') freestanding sign, noting that currently there are altemate theater marquee signs on adjacent roads (although lower in height); specified the location of the proposed signage; for Commissioner Naggar, advised that if it was the desire of the Commission additional language could be added to the amendment to reflect allowance of solely one marquee; for Commissioner Fahey, dadfled the location of the comer monument, the Promenade signs, and the proposed theater sign; noted that the permitted height for signage at the Power Center was twelve feet (12'); .for Commissioner Webster, provided the location of altemate Edwards Cinema signage; for Commissioner Soltysiak, relayed. that the island median where the proposed signage would be located would be landscaped; and in response to Commissioner Soltysiak's querying, noted that-this particular sign would exceed the permitted signage per the City's Sign Ordinance. Ms. Patti Skoglund, representing the applicant, relayed that the design of this particular signage would be consistent with the matedal used on the mall buildings (i.e., the stone, the base); for Commissioner Webster, noted that there were approximately three alternate marquee signs for the Edwards Cinema; and relayed that the rationale for the proposed signage was due to the fact the Edwards theater would be located at the rear of the mall. Ms. Patrida Hall; 27483 Lark Court, expressed opposition to the project due to the negative visual effect, and the diversion it could provide to traffic attention, with the potential of creating a hazard. The Commission expressed the following concems and comments: Commissioner Naggar relayed his concerns, as follows: > that the height of this particular sign would be inappropriate, perspective of alternate mall features, specifically the comer monument that the Edwards Cinema has suffident alternate signage opposed amending the Specific Plan due to the long-term effects on future signage in the area > recommended that the Specific Plan regulation maintained of twelve foot (12"') be Commissioner Fahey relayed her comments, as follows: That she was opposed to amending the Specific Plan Expressed concem regarding the proliferation of signage Advised that this particular signage was unsuitable Commissioner Webster relayed concun'ence with the aforementioned Commission comments. Commissioner Soltysiak expressed his comments, as follows: > Relayed concern with regard to signage throughout the mall site, querying the. impact each sign would have' in perspective to the scale of' the mall project in its entirety > Advised that this particular signage could minimize the effect of the approved Mall Comer Monument Sign Chairman Guerdero expressed opposition to amending the Specific Plan. MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public headng; deny the request to amend the Specific Plan; and to deny the twenty-six foot (26') freestanding entertainment marquee for the Edwards Cinema at the Promenade Mall. Commissioner Webster seconded the motion. Initially, Commissioner Soltysiak queded whether there would he benefit to bdnging the project beck to the Commission, in order for the applicant to address the Commission's concerns. 4 For Commissioner Soltysiak, Planning Manager clarified the Specific Plan with regard to its nonspecificity to overall signage, relaying that the Specific Plan provided general provisions (i.e., specifying the number of signs per development). At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous denial of the project, as proposed. Plannine A.ol~lication No. PA97-044 (Tentative Parcel ma~} No. 28000) and Plannin_a ADl~lication No. PA97-0446 (Chanae of Zone) Request to subdivide 1.07 net acres into two residential lots, and to change the zoning of the property from Low Density Residential L1 (1 acre to 2.5 acres lot size) to Low Density Residential L2 (112 acre to I acre lot size). RECOMMENDATION it is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the requesL Commissioner Soltysiak advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this Agenda Item, and therefore left the dais. By way of maps, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record); highlighted the current zoning in the adjacent area; relayed that staff had received three letters in opposition to the project, one pdor to the headng which were distributed to the Commission; noted that the concems expressed ware, as follows; alteration of the rural character of the community, the threat of grading redudng the equestrian trails, the potential of decreased property values, noise, increased traffic, and dust pollution; relayed that staff has advised that this particular project would be an appropriate use for the area of discussion; for Commissioner Fahey, clarified that the previous addressed issues of concerns (i.e., roads, septic, water, and emergency access) have been addressed; and for Commissioner Naggar, relayed that the proposed project "is for the development of two residential lots on 1.07 acres. Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, for Commissioner Fahey, specified in detail the improvements in the area of discussion; in response to Commissioner Naggar's comments, regarding the letter submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Gosser (per supplemental agenda material) relayed that the CC&R's for this particular site expired three years ago; noted that the negative eroding effect in the area are most likely due to the natural sandy soil, relaying that due to the dense landscaping, this particular project would not have significantly impact the erosion; and provided additional clarification with regard to the provision of utilities. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project: o Mr. Wilson Nolan z3 Ms. Brook Nolan 30250 Santiago Road 30250 Santiago Road ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99- \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\104Pa99.CC.cloc 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104 (AMENDMENT NO. I TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263), THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER, SECTION IV. E. 4., TO ALLOW A 26-FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT MARQUEE, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910-130- 052, -053 AND -054 WHEREAS, Edwards Theatre Circuit, Inc. filed Planning Application NO. PA99-0104, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0104 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0104 on May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of Planning Application No. PA99-0104; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. A. The Planning Commission in recommending denial of Planning Application No. PA99-0104, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is not consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. The Specific Plan was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. Given that the amendment would allow signage above the maximum allowed by the Specific Plan for marquee signage at the site, the amendment is considered inconsistent. The Commission determined that there were no circumstances presented by the applicant that would compel the Commission to change the Specific Plan which is well thought out in design and intent. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\i04pa99.CC.doc 13 2. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan allows marquee signage at the site as high as twelve feet (12'), while the proposed amendment is to twenty-six feet (26'). The Specific Plan was found to be compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community, and therefore the amendment would be incompatible. 3. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed street marquee sign will be similar in design, construction, colors, materials used and height to the proposed free-standing sign for the Mall, also located along Winchester Road. 4. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use development. 5. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 will not ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. A signage program for the rfiall was studied, approved and included within the Specific Plan to achieve a desirable character for development. The proposed Zoning Amendment to Specific Plan No. 263 does not conform to this program. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project site has been subject to extensive environmental review. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and an Addendure to the EIR were prepared and certified for the Temecula Regional center Specific Plan. An Initial Environmental Study (IES) was prepared by staff for Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan). Since pylon signage along Winchester Road were considered and approved under this development plan, staff determined that no further environmental analysis is required at this time. Section 4. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends denial of Planning Application No. PA99-0104 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan), to amend the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, allowing a street marquee sign at a height of twenty-six feet (26') on property located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910-130-052,-053 and -054. \\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTH04pa99.CC.doc 14 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this nineteenth da~ of May, 1999. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the nineteenth day of May, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\ 104pa99. CC. doc 15 ITEM 27 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Howard R. Windsor, Fire Marshal/Battalion Chief July 13, 1999 Second Reading of Ordinance 99-14 (Fire Codes) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION BACKGROUND: This is a continuation of a public headng on June 22, 1999. The modification requested by the City Council in Section 902.2.2.2 has been amended to include the language, "or reasonable alternative acceptable to the Fire Depadment." State Code requires that the second reading be heard at a public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 99-14 Staff Report of June 22, 1999 Agenda Reports\Fire Codes 1 ORDINANCE NO. 99-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16 of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I CODES ADOPTED 15.16.010. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the California Fire Code, 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), is adopted by reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, including: Califomia Fire Code (CFC) Volume 1, CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition with appendices I-A, I-C, II-A, II-B, II-E, II-F, II-G, I1-1, II-J, Ill-A, Ill-B, IV-B and V- A. Bo Uniform Fire Code Standards Volume 2, 1997 edition as amended by the California Fire Code (CFC), CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition. ARTICLE II AMENDMENTS 15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Be Corporate counsel shall mean the City Attorney of the City of Temecula. Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Municipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shall be known as the City of Temecula a municipality. C. Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: R:%Ords 99-14 I Fire Protection EQuioment and Fire Hydrants Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an approved manner to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots). See also Section 1001.7. Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Premises Identification Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and_industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches in size. Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows: Dimensions Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches. EXCEPTION: 1. Vertical clearances may be reduced, provided such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance when approved. 2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty (20) feet. R:\Ords 99-14 2 G= Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as follows: Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all-weather ddving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet, or a reasonable alternative acceptable to the Fire Department. In accordance with Section 8704, pdor to building construction all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. VVhen temporary fire apparatus access roads are provided for use until permanent fire access roads are installed; the fire apparatus roads shall be an all weather surface for an 80,000 Ibs GVW, or reasonable alternative acceptable to the Fire Department. Section 902.2.2.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Tumin.Q Radius Fire apparatus access roads for commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a tuming radius of a minimum forty-five (45) feet-outside radius. EXCEPTION: For single family residential, fire apparatus access roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38) feet outside radius. Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end read or cul-de-sac shall not exceed 1320 feet. Section 902.2.2.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: R:\Ords 99-14 3 Brid~es When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access mad, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized standards. See Article 90, Standard a.1.1 The bddge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Bridges shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 Ibs. GVVV. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the chief. Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows: Grade The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under Section 902.2.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. Entrances to roads, trails or other accessways which have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with Section 902.2.4.2 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited, as an infraction, or removed at the owners' expense, forthwith, by any public agency. Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows: R:\Ords 99-14 4 Plans Complete plans and specifications for fire alarm systems; fire-extinguishing systems, including automatic sprinklers and wet or dry standpipes; halon systems and other special types of fire-extinguishing systems; basement pipe inlets; and other fire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall include, but not limited to, a floor plan; location of all alarm-initiating and alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipment; annunciation; power connection; battery calculations; conductor type and sizes; voltage drop calculations; and manufacturers, model numbers and listing information for all equipment, devices and materials, [for SFM] and state fire marshal listing number of all equipment, devices and materials requiring listing. Plans and specifications for automatic fire sprinklers or suppression systems in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not limited to: a site plan; a building floor plan; piping plan (on a separate sheet); reflective ceiling plan (on a separate sheet); building cross sections; calculations; hanger details; earthquake sway brace details and calculations; manufacturer specifications, model numbers and listing information for all equipment, devices and materials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided for each system dser serving a building and for each floor when system dsers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan. System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply in calculated systems. Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing. Section 1001.5.4 is amended to read as follows: Systems in hi.clh-dse buildings. The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A wdtten record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section 403.) Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows: R:\Ords 99-14 5 Smoke-control systems. Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atda, covered mall buildings and mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smoke-proof enclosures and for smoke-removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies, shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. Section 1001.7.1 is amended to read as follows: General Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and other materials or things shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hydrant and shall comply with Section 1001.7.2. Automatic fire sprinkler system dsers shall not be obstructed in any manner, if a system dser is to be concealed by means of a wall, soffit, column, or other building construction, it shall be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser, access shall be provided by means of a door with the minimum dimensions two (2) feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows: Clear space around hydrants. A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections, post indicator valves, OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances. Section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows: R:\Ords 99-14 6 Special Hazards. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus, or emergency operations is unduly difficult, the chief is authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm systems, approved fire department communication systems, automatic sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose, fixed or portable fire extinguishers, suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus, manual or automatic covers, carbon dioxide, foam, halogenated or dry chemical or other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided, they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform Fire Code Standards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90 and Section 101.3. Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the Building Code and Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with Article 81. Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows: General An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see Section 1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81. R:\Ords 99-14 7 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A-Ill-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-Ill-A-1 requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2 or the Califomia Fire Code, Title 24_CCR part 9. Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where ReQuired All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by UFC. Standard 10-2 or, when approved by the chief, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1" R:\Ords 99-14 8 A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored, 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows: Connections to other systems. A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having jurisdiction. Burglary, secudty systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted to be a part of, or be connected to fire alarm systems. All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system. Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Cost Recovery Section 24.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or attended by him to escape his control or burn any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public, or pdvate agency or the County Fire Department incurring such expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of mitigating and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said R:\Ords 99-14 9 charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public or pdvate agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under adsing contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2. The expense of securing any emergency, which is a result of a violation of this ordinance, is a charge against the person whose violation of this ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses incurred by the Fire Department for secudng such emergency shall constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2.1. The expense of secudng any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire Department and/or Health Department for secudng such incident shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectible by the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case of an obligation arising under contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.3. Structure, improvement shall mean, for the purposes of this Section only, any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire. Section 24.4 Requests for copies of public and legal documents, photographs, etc., relating to department activities is available as authorized by law through the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All document requests shall be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside County Fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Riverside County Ordinance 671. Appendix Chapter Ill-A, Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Fire-flow reauirements for residential tracts, commercial, retail, industrial, heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments. R:\Ords 99-14 10 5.3 One and Two family residential tracts with structures less than 3,600 square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.4 Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.5 Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. X. Appendix Chapter Ill-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows: LOCATION Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets. Fire hydrants used or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by Table A Ill-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads and adjacent public streets. EXCEPTION: VVhen required hydrants utilized or is installed to the frontage requirements which serves single family dwellings on residential streets, such fire hydrant may be on either side of the street. Section 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. Section 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. Section 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof R:\Ords 99-14 11 or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July 1999. Steven J. Ford, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-14 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None R:\Ords 99-14 12 Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE:v~-C-'--- CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Howard R Windsor, Fire Marshal/Battalion Chief ~'~"~"' · June 22, 1999 An Urgency Ordinance Amending the California Fire Code. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1 Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment. 2. Approve a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A ' DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS.TO CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled: URGENCY ORDINANCENO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. forms c:tv clerk forms,staff report - Snell 1 4. Conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 99- entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1,. CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the most current edition of the California Fire Code is one of the most important public health, safety and welfare issues that will be presented to you for your consideration and adoption. The fire codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of California are reviewed, amended and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a three (3) year code adoption cycle. Upon the adoption and publication of the State Codes, each local jurisdiction has a period of 180 days to further modify these Codes with more stringent local amendments based upon local geographical, topographical and or climatic conditions. The ordinance before you tonight is being presented as an urgency ordinance. The state mandated adopt;on date is July 1, 1999. Therefore, due to the length of time involved with staff's extensive study of the new code editions, and to enable staff to adopt the California Fire Code with local amendments before this date, the urgency action is necessary. The ordinance before you tonight proposes very few local amendments. Many of the provisions in this ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the current Municipal Code, Staff is proposing to modify the code provisions that are mostly administrative in nature and are substantiated on the requirements of fire apparatus for turning radius, weight and operational considerations. Provisions that dictate the requirement of fire extinguishing systems based on building construction type, size of the building, and required fire flow currently exist and will be carried forward. These provisions are consistent with regulations as currently required. by Riverside .County Fi're Department. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: p:~forrns~c~ty clerk forrns~stafi' report - snell 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TESIECULA SETTLNG FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETER.MINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE. CCR TITLE 24 PART 9. 1998 EDITION. ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. WHEREAS. certain building standards and other related uniform codes are adopted bv the State of California m the California Building Standards Code which becomes applicable in the City unless amended by the City pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958: and. WitEREAS. Health and Safetv Code Section 17958.5 provides for the City Council to make reasonably necessary changes or modifications based on certain local conditions before adopting the most current edition of the model codes: and, WHEREAS. the Fire Chief of the City of Temecula has determined and recommended that the modifications to the California Fire Code CCR. Title 24 Part 9. 1998 edition are reasonably required to be adopted by the City of Temecula: and. WHEREAS. Health and Safetv Code Section 17958..7 requires the City Council to make express tinclings of the necessity for modifications to the building standards in the most current editions of the model codes as adopted. by the State of California. NOXV. THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TENIECULA DOES ilEREBY RESOLVE. DETERN!INE. FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLO~VS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby expressly finds that the amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Fire Code. CCR Title 24 Part 9. 1998 edition. contained in Ordinance No. 99- regarding identification of fire protection equipment and premises (Subsections C and D of Sections i5.16.020 of the Tcmecula Municipal Codel. fire apparatus access roads (Subsections E. F. G. H. I. J and K of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire protection systems and equipment (Subsections L. M, N, O. P, and Q of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Codel. fire-extinguishing systems {Subsection R, S and T of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Codel. fire alarms (Subsection U of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Codel. fire-flow requirements {Subsection W of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Codel and fire hydrant locations iSubsection X of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula MuniCipal Code ~ are reasonably necessary due to consideration of specific local climatic. geological or topographical conditions as follows: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot. dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These Winds constitute a contributing factor which causes small fires originating in high density. development presently being constructed in the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula which spread quickly and create the need for 'an increased level of fire protection. This added protection, including, but not limited to on-site protection. will supplement normal Fire Department response available in new development. and provide immediate fire protection for life and safety of multiple- occupancy occupants during fire occurrence. Topo_,2raphical Conditions: Traffic and circulation congested in urban areas often place Fire Department response time to emergencies at risk. This condition makes the need for enhanced on-site protection for property occupants necessary. Geoloaical Conditions: The City of'Temecula is located in an area near high seismic acti'vity. Because of the degree of 'the Citv's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake. emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds that the administrative amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Fire Code. CCR Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition. contained in Ordinance No. 99- regarding definitions (Subsections A and B of See. lion 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code) and cost recovery (Subsection V of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), are reasonably necessary to allow for the application of the Fire Code by procedures suited to the size and nature of the City's staff and administrative agencies by means suited to the City's experience with local climatic, geological. and topographical conditions and to provide sufficient staff support for the time-consuming inspections and analysis required by the City's fire and geological hazards. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify. the adoption of this Resolution. STATE OF CALIFORNIA t COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE~ SS CITY OF TEMECULA I. Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula. California. do hereby certi~, that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted bv the Ci~' Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June. 1999. by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones. CMC City Clerk APPROVED AND ADOPTED. this 22rid dav of June. !999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford. Mavor Susan W. Jones. CMC City Clerk ~SEALI URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDLNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDLNG CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEI~IECULA MITNrlCIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION' AND THE UNIFOR,%I FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLL,'3, IE 2. 1997 EDITION. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16. of Title 15 (Buildings and Construcuonl of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as tbllows: ARTICLE ! CODES ADOPTED 15.16.0111. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter. the California Fire Code. 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulationsl. is adopted by reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula. including: California Fire Code (CFC) Volume I, CCR Title 24 pan 9. 1998 edition with appendices I-A. I-C. II-A, II-B. II-E. II-F, II-G. II-I. II-J. Ill-A, III- B, IV-B and V-A. Uniform Fire Code Standards Volume 2. 1997 edition as amended bv the California Fire Code ICFC). CCR Title 24 pan 9. 1998 edition. ARTICLE 11 ANIENDN.IENTS 15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments. additions and deletions are made to the California Fire Code. 1998 edition, as adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Corporale comisel shall mean the City Attorney of the City of Temecula. Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Municipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shall be known as ~ ,rtls 9S- 15 I the City of Temecula a municipality. C. Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an approved manner to prevent obslruction by parking and other obstructions. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots). See also Section 1001.7. D. Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Premises Identification Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting -color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve .(12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches in size. E. Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows: Dimensions OrdsX95-15 Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four {24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not hess than thirteen ~131 feet and six (6) inches. EXCEPTION: 1. VertiCal clearances may be reduced. provided such reduction does not impair access bv fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance when approved. 2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have and an unobstructed width of not less than twenty (20) feet. Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when. in the opinion of the chief. vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as tbllows: Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thic'kness of .25 feet. In accordance with Secuon 8704, prior to building construction all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. When temporary tire apparatus acce'ss roads are provided for use until permanent fire access roads are installed: the fire apparatus roads shall be an all weather surface for an 80,000 lbs GVW. Section 902.2.2.3 is hereb.~ amended to read as follows: Turnin~ Radius Fire apparatus access roads for commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a turning radius of a minimum forw-five (45) feet--outside radius. EXCEPTION: For single family residential. fire apparatus access roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38) feet outside radius. H. Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end road or cul-de-sac shall not exceed 1320 feet. I. Section 90~ ~ '~ 5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Bridges When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access road, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized standards. See Article 90, Stm~dard a. 1.1 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. ~S~dges shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 lbs. GVW. VehiCle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the chief. J. Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows: Grade Th'e gradient tbr a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. K. Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum Ords\95-15 4 requirecl widths and clearances estaOlished under SecUon 902.2.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. Entrances to roads. trails or other accesswavs which have b~n closed with gates and barriers in accordance with Section 902.2.4.2 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropnhte notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited. as an infraction. or removed at the owners' expense. forthwith. by any public agency. Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows: Plans Complete plans and specifications for fire alarm systems: tire-extinguishing systems. including automatic spnn'klers and wet or dry standpipes: halon systems and other special types of fire-extinguishing systems: basement pipe inlets; and other tire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall include. but not limited to. a floor plan: location of all alarm-initiating and alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipment: annunciation: power connection: battery calculations: conductor type and sizes: voltage drop calculations: and manuticturers. model numbers and listing information for all equipment. devices and materials. O'i~r SFM] and state fire marshal listing number of aH equipment, devices and materials requiring listing. Plans and specifications for automatic fire spnn'klers or suppression systems in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not limited to: a site plan: a building floor plan: piping plan (on a separate sheet); reflective ceiling plan {on a separate sheet); building cross sections: calculations: hanger details: earthquake sway brace details and calculations; manufacturer specifications. model numbers and listing information for all equipment. devices and n~aterials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided for each system riser serving a building and for each floor when system risers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan. System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply in calculated systems. Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing: M. Section 1001.5.4 is amended-to read as follows: Systems in high-rise buildings; The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained in an operahie condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved .persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section 403.) N. Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows: Smoke-control systems. Mechanical smoke~control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke- removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies, shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record 'and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. O. Section 1001.7.1 is amended to read as follows: General Posts, t~nces, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and other materials or things shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that Orfis~95-15 6 would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hydrant and shall comply with Section 1001.7.2. Automatic fire spnnkler system risers shall not be obstructed in any manner. if a system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall. soffit. column. or other buildirig construction, it shall be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser, access shall be provided by means of a door with the minimum dimensions two feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall. P. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows: Clear space around hvdrants. A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections. post indicator valves, OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances. Q. Section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows: Special Hazards. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus. or emergency operations is unduly difficult. the chief is authorized to require additional sateguards consisting of additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance. or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm systems. approved fire department communication systems. automatic spnn'kler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose. fixed or portable fire extinguishers. suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus. manual or automatic covers. carbon dioxide. foam. halogenated or dry chemical or other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided, they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform Fire Code Standards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90 and Section 101.3. R. Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the Building Code and Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with tim-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with Article 81. S. Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows: General An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials. see Section 1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A'III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies OntJ~95-15 8 Unless State Code or Statutes. California Building Code. Title 24 CCR part 2. or the California Fire Code. Title 24 CCR part 9. is more restncUve. every existing structure to which additions are made. ,,,.'here either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire spnnkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes. California Building Code. Title 24 CCR part 2 or the California Fire Code. Title 24 CCR part 9. T, Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic spnnkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of spnnkler heads. Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station. remote station or proprietary. monitoring station as defined bv UFC. Standard 10-2 or. when approved by the chief. shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-i-1" A minimum of one (I) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. ' ~rtls 1'95- I 5 U. Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows: Connections to other systems. A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having jurisdiction. Burgarly, security systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted to be a part of. or be connected to fire alarm systems. All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system. V. Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24 is hereby amended bv adding thereto: Cost Recovery Section 24.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or artended by him to escape his control or burn any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be-a charge. against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal. state, county, public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of mitigating and/or removing the haTard created by said actions or omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be ()rd~95-15 I0 collectible bv the person. or bv the federal. state. count,.. public or private agency or bv the County Fire Department and/or the County Health Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract. expressed or implied. Section 24.2. The expense of secunng any emergency, which is a result of a violation of this ordinance, is a charge against the person whose violation of this ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused bv and expenses incurred bv the Fire Department for secunng such emergency shall constitute a clebt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract. expressed or implied. Section 24.2.1. The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely' hazardous materials or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectible by the Countv Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case of an obligation arising under contract. expressed or implied. Section 24.3. Structure. improvement shall mean. for the purposes of this Section only, any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn. corral. fence. or bridge whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire. Section 24.4 Requests for copies of 'public and legal documents. photographs. etc.. relating to department activities is available as authorized by law through the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All document requests shall ' uds ,95-15 I I be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside County Fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Riverside County Ordinance 671. W, Appendix Chapter Ill-A, Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Fire-flow requirements for residential tracts. commercial. retail. industrial. heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments. 5.3 One and Two family residential tracts with structures less than 3,600 square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. '5.4 Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shah have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.5 Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20' psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. Appendix Chapter III-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows: LOCATION Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets. Fire hydrants used or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by Table A III-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads and adjacent public streets. EXCEPTION: When required hydrants utilized or is installed to the frontage requirements which serves single hmily dwellings on C)rds~t)5- 15 12 residential streets. such fire hydrant max' be on either side of the street. SECTION 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code. as adopted by this Ordinance. and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code. as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code or' Regulations. are changes. modifications. amendments. additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code. these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. SECTION 4. If any section. subsection. subdivision. paragraph. sentence. clause or phrase of this Ordinance or an3' part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid. such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The Citv Council of the Ciw of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section. subsection. subdivision. paragraph. sentence. clause or phrase hereof. irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections. subsections. subdivisions. paragraphs. sentences. clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. State law requires that localities adopt the California Building Standards Code and modifications thereto. by July 1. 1999. It is essential that the City have in effect on the date codes that.comport with state 'law and contain those modifications necessitated bv unique topographic. geologic and climatic conditions. In the absence of immediate effectiveness. the provisions of the Fire Code unique to the Citv's special circumstances will not be in place and this ~vill have a detrimental effect on the public. health safety and wellS. re. The modifications to the Codes contain vital provisions regarding administrative procedures. fire-extinguishing systems. and other similar matters necessitated bv the Citv's proximity to active earthquake/~ault zones. the Citv's exposure to Santa Ana winds. and the City's limited rainfall in the summer and thll months. For these reasons. the public health. sa/i~t,,' and welfare require that this ordinance take effect on July 1. 1999 as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code Sections 36934 and 36937. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become operative on July 1. 1999. ",:'i -5-!5 PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July 1999. Steven J. Ford. Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones. CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Orcls'~95-15 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA t COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE~ SS CITY OF TEMECULA ~ I. Susan W. Jones. City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing. Ordinance No. 99-__was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June 1999, and that thereafter. said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 6th da): of July. 1999. by the following roll call vote: A YES COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk DrJs 95-15 15 ORDLNANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BI; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLLr~t E 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2. 1997 EDITION. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16 of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I CODES ADOPTED 15.16.010. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter. the California Fire Code. 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). is adopted bv reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, including: A. California Fire Code (CFC) Volume 1, CCR Title 24 part 9. 1998 edition with appendices I-A, I-C, II-A, II-B, II-E, II-F, II-G. lI-I. II-J. Ill-A, [II- B, IV-B and V-A. B. Uniform Fire COde Standards Volume 2. 1997 edition as amended bv the California Fire Code (CFC). CCR Title 24 part 9. 1998 edition. ARTICLE Il AN'IENDNIENTS 15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments. additions and deletions are made to the California Fire Code. 1998 edition. as adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is herebv amended bv adding thereto: Corporate counsel shall mean the City Attorney of the Citv of Temecula. Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Mu,ficipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shall be known as r -'rds~95-15 I the City of Temecula a municipality. C. Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an approved manner to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots). See also Section 1001.7. D. Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Premises Identification Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and: industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family .residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches in size. E. Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows: Dimensions (,~rdsx95-15 2 Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed verucal clearance of not tess than thirteen (13) feet and six (6)inches. EXCEPTION: 1. Vertical clearances may be reduced. provided such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance when approved. 2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have and an unobstructed width of not less than twenty (20) feet. Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when. in the opinion of the chief. vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide ~re apparatus access. Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as follows: Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 8704, prior to building construction all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. When temporary fire apparatus access roads are provided for use until permanent fire access roads are installed: the fire apparatus roads shall be an all weather surface for an 80,000 lbs GVW. Section 902.2.2.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Turning Radius Fire apparatus access roads lbr commercial. multi-familv residential and industrial buildings shall have a turning radius of a minimum forty-five (45) feet--outside radius. EXCEPTION: For single family residential. fire apparatus access t mls~,~5.15 ~ roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38) feet outside radius. H. Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end road or cul-de-sac shall not exceed 1320 feet. I. Section 902.2.2.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Bridges When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access road, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized standards. See Article 90, Standard a. 1.1 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Bridges shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 lbs. GVW. .Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the chief.. J. Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows: Grade The gradient tbr a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. K. Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum O~ds~95-15 4 required widths and clearances established under Section 902.2.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. Entrances to roads. trails or other accessways which have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with. Section 902.2.4.2 shall not. be obstructed by parked vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited. as an infraction. or removed at the owners' expense. forthwith. by any public agency. L. Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows: Plans Complete plans and specifications/br fire alarm systems: fire-extinguishing systems, including automatic sprinklers and wet or dry standpipes: halon systems and other special types of tire-extinguishing systems; basement pipe inlets; and other tire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall include, but not limited to, a floor plan: location of all alarm-initiating and 'alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipmet/t: annunciation: power connection: battery calculations: conductor type and sizes: voltage drop calculations: and manufacturers. model numbers and listing information for all equipmen/. devices and materials. [/br SFM] atul state fire marshal listing number of all equipment, devices and materials requiring listing. Plans and specifications tb.r automatic fire spnnklers or suppression systems in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not limited to: a site plan: a building floor plan: piping plan ton a separate sheet): reflective ceiling plan (on a separate sheet): building cross sections: calculations; hanger details: earthquake sway brace details and calculations; manufacturer specifications. model numbers and listing information tbr all equipment. devices.and materials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided for each system riser serving a building and for each floor when system risers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan. System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply in calculated systems. Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing. M. Section 1001.5.4 is amended to read as follows: Systems in high-rise buildings. The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained in an operahie condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section 403. ) N. Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows: Smoke-control systems. Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke- removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies, shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarte~y tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. O. Section I001.7.1 is amended to read as follows: General Posts./~nces. vehicles, growth, trash. storage and other materials or things shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants,. fire department inlet connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that ~)fasx95-15 6 would prevent such equipment or fire hvdrants from being immediately discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hvdrant and shall comply with Section 1001.7.2. Automatic fire spnn'kler system risers shall not be obstructed in any manner. if a system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall. soffit. column. or other building construction. it shall be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser. access shall be provided bv means of a door with the minimum dimensions two (2) feet six (6) inches wide bv six ~6) feet eight (8) inches tall. P. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows: Clear space around hydrants. A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants. fire department inlet connections, post indicator valves. OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances. Q. Section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows: Special Hazards. For t~ccupancic~ Of an espcciaily hazardous nature or where special hazards exxst in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy. or where access for fire apparatus. or emergency operations is undulv difficult. the chief is authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire appliance units. more than one type of appliance. or special systems suitable tbr the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm systems. approved fire department communication systems. automatic spnnkler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose. fixed or portable fire extinguishers. suitable fire blankets. breathing apparatus. manual or automatic covers. carbon dioxide. foam, halogenated or dry chemical or other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided. they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform Fire Code Stm~dards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90 and Section 101.3. Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General· Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the Building Code and SectiOn 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with Article 81. S, Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows: General An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2. : For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials. see Section 1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed in TaBle No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installeel throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Ordsx95-15 8 Unless State Code or Statutes. California Building. Code. Title 24 CCR part 2. or the California Fire Code. Title 24 CCR part 9. is more restrictive. every existing structure to which additions are made. where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiring a fire flow of 1.500 gallons per minute shall have an approvecl automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every, existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes. California Building Code. Title 24 CCR part 2 or the California Fire Code. Title 24 CCR part 9. Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station. remote station or proprietar'y. monitoring station as defined by UFC. Standard 10-2 or. when approved bv the chief. shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided bv the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. U. Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows: Connections to other systems. A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having J'urisdiction. Burgarly, security systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted to be a pan of, or be connected to fire alarm systems. All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system. V. Appendix Chapter II-A. Section 24 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Cost Recovery Section 24.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or artended by him to escape his control or burn any structure, improvement, ~forest, range or grassland, is liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such person which is coilectible by the person, or by the federal. state. county. public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of mitigating and/or removing 'the hazard created by said actions or omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be (-'rd~,95-15 10 collectible by me person. or bv the federal. state. county. public or private agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health Department incurnng the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract. expressed or implied. Section 24.2. The expense of securing any emergency. which is a result of a violation of this ordinance. is a charge against the person whose violation of this ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses incurred by the Fire Department for secunng such emergency shall constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract. expressed or implied. Section 24.2.1. The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any statute. regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident Shall constitute a debt of such .person or persons and shall be collectible by the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case of an obligation arising under contra. ct. expressed or implied. Section 24.3. Structure. improvement shall mean. for the purposes of this Section only. any building, garage, tent. out-building, barn. corral. fence. or bridge whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire. Section 24.4 Requests for copies of public and legal documents. photographs. etc.. relating to department activities is available as authorized bv law through the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All document requests shall be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside County Fire Department, in the amount{s) set forth in Riverside County Ordinance 671. W. Appendix Chapter III-A, 'Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Fire-flow requirements for residential tracts. commercial. retail. industrial. heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments. 5.3 One and Two farofly residential tracts with structures less than 3,600 square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.4 Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix III-B. 5.5 Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a'4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B. X. Appendix Chapter III-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows: LOCATION Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required fir~ apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets. Fire hydrants uid or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by Table A III-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads and adjacent public streets. EXCEPTION: When required hydrants utilized or is installed to the frontage requirements which serves single family dwellings on c ~rds~95-15 12 residential streets. such fire hydrant may be on either side of the street. SECTION 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code. as adopted by. this Ordinance. and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code. as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. are changes, modifications. amendments. additions or ~teletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantialIv the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code. these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. SECTION 4. If any section. subsection. subdivision. paragraph, sentence. clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid. such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section. subsection, subdivision. paragraph. sentence. clause or phrase hereof. irrespective of the fact that anv one or more sections. subsections. subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences. clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certi~' to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June 1999. Steven J. Ford. Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones. CMC City Clerk [SEALI ~ ,ra~ 95-2_< STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I. Susan W. Jones. City Clerk of the City of Temecula. do hereby certify that the foregoing - Ordinance No. 99-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the Citv Council on the 22nd day of June. and that thereafter. said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, bv the followTing roll call vote: AYES COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ~rds *15-I5 14 ITEM 28 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOROF FINANC CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official July 13, 1999 Second Reading of Ordinance 99-16 (Uniform Building Codes) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE t997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE BACKGROUND: This is a continuation of a public headng on June 22, 1999. The modification requested by the City Council in Section 106.3.1 has been amended to include the language, "All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid City of Temecula business license" has been made. State Code requires that the second reading be heard at a public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 99-16 Staff Report of June 22, 1999 Agenda Reports~Building Codes 1 ORDINANCE NO. 99-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE t998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE t997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION h Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: t5.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula: California Building Code, 1998 Edition (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); Co California Plumbing Code, 1998 Edition (Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); California Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials G. Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; and A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such codes are in force. 15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions R:ords 99-16 1 are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B= Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read as follows: Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. Co Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to mad as follows: All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid City of Temecula business licenses. Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the California Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. E. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety. F. Section 304.1 is amended by adding the following exception: Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area, for the purpose of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less. G. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. R:ords 99-16 2 Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with this Section and Fire Code Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fir,?, extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with the Fire Code. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows: VVhere required An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. [For SFM] For special provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium, and calcium carbide, see the Fire Code. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see the Fire Code. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the Califomia Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A-Ill-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-Ill-A-1 requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy R:ords 99-16 3 Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR Part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24_CCR Part 9. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where ReQuired All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the fire department, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9- 1-1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. Exception: Exception: 1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1503. The roof covedng on any structure regulated by this Code shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504, except that no roof covering shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly. 1. The roof covedng on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical Distdct Overlay, generally known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. 2. The roof covering of any structure located on a parcel with a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof covering of not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approved by the R:ords 99-16 4 Building Official. 3. The roof covering of all re-roofing shall conform to the applicable provisions of this Section as amended herein, except that the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the remainder of the roof. K. Section 1924 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2) inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) mil moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover. Exception: 1. A moisture barder shall not be required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217. Section 1924 is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new paragraph to read as follows: Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches in length. ApDendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the barrier that faces away from the swimming pool. The following appendices are deleted in their entirety from the 1998 California Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21,23, 33, 34. 0, t5.04.030 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. R:ords 99-16 5 Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.040 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Plumbin.cl Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 211 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system. Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code. F. Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap" or other approved matedal for installation where subject to vehicular traffic. R:ords 99-16 6 G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a twenty- four (24) hour graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction. H. Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the following exceptions: Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approved by the Building Official. I. Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted in its entirety. J. Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in its entirety. K. Appendix J - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings is hereby deleted in its entirety. 15.04.050 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 90-4 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following: Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted.) Where spare circuit protective devices are provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official. Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than ~ A.W.G. shall be used. D. Section 336-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: R:ords 99-16 7 Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-4(b), and shall only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade. 15.04.060 Uniform Administrative Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. R:ords 99-16 8 Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. 15.04.070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Danfierous BuildinQs, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. 15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housin.~ Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. SECTION Ih All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. R:ords 99-16 9 SECTION IIh To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. SECTION IV: If an section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION V: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance SECTION Vh This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following the date of adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:ords 99-16 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-16 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:ords 99-16 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY A'FFORNEY C~, . fP t ,, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE · CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official June 22, 1999 An Urgency Ordinance Amending the Uniform Building Codes RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment. Approve a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODES, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled: 6, 16/99 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: 1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. 4. Conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 99-__ entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIAVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the most current editions of the model building codes is one of the most important building safety issues that will be presented to you for your consideration and adoption. The building codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of California are reviewed, amended and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a three (3) year code adoption cycle. Upon adoption and publication of these codes, each local jurisdiction has a period of 180 days to further modify these codes with more stringent 16cal amendments based upon specific local geological, topographical and or climatic conditions. The ordinance before you tonight is being presented as an urgency ordinance. The state mandated adoption date is July 1, 1999. Therefore, due to the time involved with staffs' extensive study of the new code editions and to enable staff to adopt the state building codes with local amendments before this date, the urgency action is necessary. The ordinance proposes very few local amendments. Staff has been involved in a statewide effort to obtain uniformity among regional or county jurisdictions in the code provisions they enforce. Specifically, staff is proposing to modify the code provisions affecting the required plumbing fixture counts in the Old Town Specific Plan area. Due to the fact that space is of a premium in this area, past history has shown that a majority of buildings in the Old Town Specific Plan area are not capable of complying with current code provisions without entering into costly additions to buildings. Unlike o.ther areas of the city, public restroom facilities have been provided at 2 6/17/99 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TE.MECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS LrPON XVHICH A DETERNIINATION 'HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. 1998 EDITION. THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE. 1998 EDITION. THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE. 1998 EDITION. AN'D THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION. ARE REASONABLY NrECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PL~LIC HEALTH. SAFETY AND WELFARE. WHEREAS. certain building standards and other related uniform codes are adopted by the State of California in the California Building Standards Code which becomes applicable in the City unless amended by the City pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958: and. WHEREAS. Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 provides for the Citv Council to make reasonably necessary changes or modifications based on certain local conditions before adopting the most current edition of the model codes; and, WHEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Temecula has determined and recommended that the modifications to the California Building Code. California Mechanical Code. California Plumbing Code, and the California Electrical Code are reasonably'required tO be 5dopted by the City of Temecula; and, WHEREAS. Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires the City Council to make express findings of the' necessity for modifications to the building standards in the most current editions of the model codes as adopted by the State of California. NOXV, THEREFORE, THE CITY COL.NCIL OF THE CITY OF TENiECLI. A DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds that the following amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Building Code. 1998 edition, the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition. the California Plumbing Code. 1998 edition. and the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition. contained in Ordinance 99- are reasonably necessary due to consideration of specific local climatic. geological or topographical conditions as follows: Resos:95-112 I. SECTION 15.04.020 CALIFORNIA BHLDING CODE. 1998 EDITION. A. Section 106.2 Work Exempt from Permits. Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height. and garden walls not over 4" measured from the top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable Class I. Class II or III-A liquids. This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Geolomcal Conditions: The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of the degree of the City 's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines. the risk of structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake, emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide mimmums will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow. Section 304.1 This amendment is administrative in nature necessitated by the space restrictions in Old Town to accommodate modifications of accessible restroom fixtures. This amendment is in line with the B occupancy criteria of 50 or less occupants as provided in the California Building Code. Section 502 This amendment is administrative in nature in that it further defines the address height criteria for residential. and individual commercial suistes. D. Section 904 Fire-Extinguishing Systems. These amendments are reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside Count)., and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot. dr>., Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These winds constitute a contributing factor which causes small fires originatin~ in high density development presently being constructed in the County of Riverside ;nd the City of T~mecula which spread quickly and create the need for an increased level of fire protection. This added R=so~ ~)5- I 12 2 protection. including. but not limited to on-site protection, will supplement normal Fire Department response available in nexv development. and provide immediate fire protection for life and safety of multiple-occupancy occupants during fire occurrence. Topoeraphical Conditions: Traffic and circulation congested in urban areas often place Fire Departmerit response time to emergencies at risk. This condition makes the need for enhanced on-she protection for propert.,,, occupants necessary. Geolo~,ical Conditions: The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activiw. Because of the degree of the City's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines. the risk of structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake, emergency resources would be extremeIx, taxed. and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow. C. Section 1503 Roof-Covering Requirements... This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Climatic Conditions: " Generally Riverside Count3., and the Ci~, of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall ,,'aries from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot. drS.' Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside Count,,,. These climatic conditions cause extreme drying of vegetation and common building materials and predispose the 'area to large destructive fires. Higher building standards are necessarv to protect against the increased risk of fire. D. Section 1924. Minimum Slab Thickness...: and Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels... These amendments are reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Ig.~soy' t)~, 1 Topographical Conditions: The City is comprised of varying soil conditions and a fluctuating water table that is ted bv artesian springs. This water table will elevate substantially followin~ heavy rain. The addition of a moisture barrier will mitigate excess moisture absorption into concrete placed on grade. Geoloaical Conditions: The Citw' of Temecula is located 'in Seismic Zone No. 4 and contains two (2) faults' rmming north and south within its boundaries. The addition of slab dowels as an additional means of attachment of added structures to existing is intended to help mitigate the effects of seismic activity on these connections. E. AppendLx Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is considered to be administrative in nature and necessary in order to allow for a 54 inch release mechanism hei~,ht from ~rade specified. ~ ~ II. SECTION 15.04,030 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION. A. Section 504 Environmental Air Ducts. Section 504.1 Makeup and exhaust ducts... This amendment is reasonablv necessary because of the following local conditions: 'Climatic Conditions: Due to the proximi.t.t2¢ to the ocean and the influx of moist air experienced in the City, water deposited in the corrugated depressions of the aluminum flex ducting will not properly evaporate, thus creating a potential for stagnation. mildew, and possible excessive build up. III. SECTION 15.04.040 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 1998 EDITION A. Section 413 and Table 4.-1 This amendment is administrative in nature. The deletion of this section is made in lieu of utilizing Chapter 29 and Appendix Chapter 29 of the California Building Code as the standard for establishing required number of plumbin-o fixtures. ~ B. Section 719.5 This amendment is administrative in nature intended to clarify an approved material for clean out installations. This is in answer to our history of inquiries on this subject. Resos,,95-112 4 C. Section 1204.3.2 Final Piping Inspection This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions: Climatic Conditions: Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Hot. dry Sarita Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These conditions contribute significantly to the fluctuation of air pressure in gas plumbing lines. In lines larger than two (2) inches these fluctuations are subtler because of the volume. hence detecting a small leak becomes more difficult in the code prescribed time frame of ten minutes. D. Section 1211.3 This amendment is administrative in nature intended to address the installation of propone gas underslab areas. This section does not address propane installation. IV. SECTION 15.04.050 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE. 1998 EDITION. A. Article 336 Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cable. Section 336-3 Uses Permitted... This amendment' is reasonably necessary because of the following local Conditions: Topographical Conditions: The City is located on a north/south transportation corridor and is developing both a medical manufacturing and micro component business base. These occupancies typically contain hazardous uses of varying degree. Non-metallic sheathed cable is not prohibited from use in the city, but only in commercial and industrial type applications where the type of construction and constant tenant improvement needs cause a concern for the potential damage that mav be caused to this cable's soft insulation and protection sheathing. B. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds that the administrative amendments and modifications to the Temecula .Municipal Code and the California Building Code. Califorma Mechanical Code. Califorma Plumbing Code. and California Electrical Code contained in Ordinance No. 99-_ regarding violations and penalties (Building Code Section 103, Mechanical Code Section 111, Plumbing Code Section 102.3.2. and Electrical Code Section 90-04}, fees (Building Code Section 107 and Table l-A, Mechanical Code Section 115. and PlUmbing Code Section 103.4). definitions (Plumbing Code Section 21 1 ~ and other provisions (e.g.. Building Code Section 106.3.1), are reasonably necessary to allow for the application of such Codes by procedures suited to the size and nature of the .City's staff and administrative agencies by means suited to the City's experience with local climatic. geological. and topographical conditions and to provide sufficient staff support for the time-consuming inspections and analysis required by the City's fire and seismic hazards. C. Section 90-8. This amendment is administrative in nature intended to bring the requirement of this section in line with the provisions of the Temecula Development Code. D. Section 110-5. This amendment is administrative in nature intended to establish a minimum size for the use of aluminum conductors primarily convenience receptacle and circuit breaker installations in residential and light commercial construction. The receptacles available are not designed for regular maintenance primarily due to the areas the>, are typically used in. D.Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford. Mayor Susan Jones. CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Resos 95-112 STATE OF CALIFORNIA/ COUNTY OF PdVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I. Susan Jones. Ciw Clerk of the City of Temecula. California. do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22rid day of June. 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones. CN/C City Clerk Resos 95-112 7 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUTI,DING CODE; THE' 1998 F-r}ITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMK-NT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE I,rNIFO~ HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 Er}ITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION I: Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes of Tifie 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 15.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following codes 'are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of. Temecula: 'A. California Building Code, 1998 Edition .(Pan 2 of Tifie 24 of the California Code of Regulations); B. California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Pan 4 of Tifie 24 of the California Code of Regulations); C. California Plumbing Code, 1998 Edition (Pan 5 of Title 24 of the Caiifomia Code of Regulations); D. Califdmia Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Pan 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); E. Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; Ords\95-14 I G, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; and A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such codes are in force. 15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read as follows: , Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the top of footing-to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or' impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read as follows: D, · All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid city business licenses. Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Cal{fornia Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety. Orda\95-14 2 F. Section 304.1 is amended by adding the following exception: Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area. for the pu.rpose of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less. G. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: . Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background. H. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with this Section and Fire Code Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire,extinguishing systems shall be national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage,-fire protection shall be in accordance with the Fire Code. I. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows: Where required An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. Ord8\95- i 4 3 [For SFM] For special provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium, and calcium carbide, see the Ere Code. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials. see the Fire Code. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the fire area square footage as listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Ti~e 24 CCR pan 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiting a'~re flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire Sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR Pan 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR Pan 9. J. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Orals\95 - 14 4 Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distincfiy different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the fire department. shall sound an .audible signal at a constantly artended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1 - 1" A minimum of one (1)'manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. Exception: 1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. J. Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504,- · except that no roof covering shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly. Exception: 1. The roof coveting on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical District Overlay, generally 'known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. 2. The roof covering of any structure located on a parcel with a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof covering of not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approved by the Buildin~ Official. 3. The .roof covering of all re-roofing shall conform to the applicable provisions of this Section as amended herein, except that the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the Orals\95-14 remainder of the roof. Section 1924 is hereby amended to' read as follows: Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported direc~y on the ground shall not be less than 'three and one-half (3 1/2) inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) rail moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover. Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217. Section 1924 is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new paragraph to read as follows: Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches in length. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the bamer that faces away from the' swimming pool. The following appendices are deleted in their entirety from the 1998 California Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23, 30, 33, 34. 15.04.030 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections Orda\95 - 14 6 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Mechanical Code to fees. fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.040 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02'.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee' tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 211 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a-pipe that does not connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system. Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code Orals\95-14 7 Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code. F. Section 719.5 is hereby amended'to read as follows: Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving. shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap" or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a twenty-four (24) hour graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction. H. Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the following exceptions: Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approveel by the Building Official. · Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix J - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings, is hereby deleted in its etirety. 15.04.050 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 90-4 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following: Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted. ) Where spare circuit protective devices are Orals\95 - 14 8 provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official. Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used. D. 'Section 336-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-4(b), and shall only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade. 15.04.060 Uniform Administrative Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1'997 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. ALl references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated 'herein by Orda\95-14 9 reference. Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. 15.1)4.070 Unifoi-m Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. 15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform' Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. SECTION II: All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions t!~ereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION III: To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall b~ construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. Ords\95-14 10 SECTION IV: If an section. subsection. subdivision. paragraph. sentence. clause or phrase of this Ordinance or an>' part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid. such invaliditv shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or an}'. part thereof or exhibit thereto: The Cit-v Council of the CiB' of Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed each section. subsection. subdivision. paragraph. sentence. clause or phrase hereof. irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections. subsections. subdivisions. paragraphs. ~cntences. clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION V: State law requires that localities adopt the California Building Standards Code and modifications thereto. by July 1. 1999. It is essential that the Ci~' have in effect on that date codes that comport with state law and contain those modifications necessitated by unique topographic. geologic and climatic conditions. In the absence of immediate effectiveness. the provisions of the Building. Electrical. Mechanical. and Plumbing Codes unique to the Citv's special circumstances will not be in place and this will have a detrimental effect on the public health. safety and welfare. The modifications to the Codes contain vital provisions regarding administrative procedures. fire- extinguishing systems, roofing materials, foundation thickness, air ducts, nonmetallic-sheathed cable. and other similar matters necessitated bv the City's proximity to active earthquake fault zones. the Citv's exposure to Santa Ana winds, and the Cit),'s limited rainfall in summer and fall months. For these reasons, the public health. safety and welfare require that this ordinance take effect on July 1.1999 as an Urgency Ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 36934 and 36937. SECTION VI: The City Clerk shall certi~' to the adoption of this Ordinance SECTION VII: This ordinance shall become operative on July 1. 1999. PASSED. APPROVED AN'D ADOPTED this 22nd day of June. 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Citv Clerk [SEAL] Ords%95-!4 11 ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TF31ECULA A1VfENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN A/VIEND1VrENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABAT~NT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIYORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION I: Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 15.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula: "A. California Building Code, 1998 Edition. (Part 2 of Ti~e 24 of the California Code of Regulations); B. California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); C. California Plumbing Code, .1998 Edition (Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); D. California Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the Califdrnia Code of Regulations); E. Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the Intemational Conference of Building Officials; F. Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, Orai\95-14 1 published by the International Conference of Building Officials Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials; and A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such codes are in force. 15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read as follows: e Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding. flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read as follows: All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid city business licenses. Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated heroin by reference. All references in the California Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety. Ords\95-14 2 Section 304.1 is amended by adding the following exception: Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area. for the purpose of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core CYRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows: General. Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with this Section and Fire Code Section 1003. Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall be national standard .hose thread or as approved by the fire department.. The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant. In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with the Fire Code. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows: Where required An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. [For SFM] For special provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium, Ordsx95-14 3 and calcium carbide, see the Fire Code. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials. see the Fire Code. 1. All Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR pan 2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR pan 9, is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the ftre area square footage as listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing Occupancies Unless State Code or Statutes, Califomia Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2, or the California Fire Code, Ti~e 24 CCR pan 9, is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of Use or Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR Pan 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR Pan 9. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored regardless of the number of sprinkler heads. Ords\95-14 4 Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the. fire deI:m'xment, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly artended location. An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1 - 1" A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each automatic fire sprinkler system riser location. Exception: 1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored. 2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved residential sprinkler system need not be monitored. Ex-ception: Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504, except that no roof coyering shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly.. 1. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. 2. The roof covering of any structure located on a parcel with a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof covering of not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approved by the Building Official. 3. The roof covering of all re-roofing shall conform to the applicable provisions of this Section as amended herein, except that the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the remainder of the roof. Ords\95-14 Section 1924 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported direc~y on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 i/2)' inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) rail moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover.. Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217. Section 1924 is hereby further mended by adding thereto a new paragraph to read as follows: Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches in length. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the barrier that faces away from the swimming pool. The following appendices are deleted in.their entirety from the 1998 Califomia Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23, 30, 33, 34. 15.04.030 California Mechanical Code. · The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly Ords\95 - 14 6 incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry. room ~xhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.040 California Ph~mbing Code. The following amendments. additions and deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through. 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expres. sly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 211 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interc2ptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system. Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code Orals\95-14 7 Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building Code. F. Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap" or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular traffic. G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a twenty-four (24) hour graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction. H. Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the following exceptions: Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approved by the Building Official. Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix J - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings is - hereby deleted in its' entirety. 15.04.050 'California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 90-4 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following: Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted.) Where spare circuit protective devices are provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the Orals\95-14 8 bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future' use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official. S~ction 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used. D. Section 336-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed wiring, except a.s provided in Section 336-4(b), and shall only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade. 15.04.060 Uniform Admlnktrative Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter. "A~ Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in thiir entirety and superseded by Section 15.02,010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. Ords\95-14 9 Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. 15.04.070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. 15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. B® Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010' through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. SECTION H: All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechamcal Code, and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7. SECTION III: To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments. Ords\95-14 I0 SECTION IV: If an section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any pan hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any pan thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it ,~:ould have passed each section; subsection. subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof. irrespective of the fact that any one or more se4:.tions, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs. sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION V: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance SECTION VI: This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following the date of adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 22nd day of June, 1999. ATFEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor o Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Orals\95 - 14 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-00 was duly introduced and placed upon 'its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, 1999, and that thereafter. said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1999, by the following roll call vote: AYE_S: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Oreis \9 5 - 14 12 ITEM 29 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager DATE: July 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Adoption of the FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~ Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analy~(~' RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2000-04 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 1999-00. DISCUSSION: The Capital improvement Program (CIP) is the City's plan for providing public improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long term life spans, and are nonrecurring. The proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling of all capital improvement projects over the next five years. CIP DEVELOPMENT The CIP was developed by taking recommendations provided by the staff and the City Council during a series of workshops. The Primary focus of these workshops was to identify community needs in the areas of roads/streets; bridges; public buildings; parks and recreation facilities; and redevelopment projects: All Projects were reviewed to ensure consistency with the provisions of the City's General Plan, as well as the long term vision of the City as developed by the City Council. On June 2, 1999 the Planning Commission found the proposed CIP to be consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65403 of the State Planning and Zoning Law. The Pubic/Traffic Safety Commission at their June 3, 1999 meeting reviewed the Circulation and Infrastructure portion of the document and requested the following changes: Widen Rainbow Canyon Road from Pala Road to the southern City limit Widen Diaz Road from Rancho California Road to Winchester Road ~TEMEC_FS2OI~A TA~DEPTSV:INANCEWORTONL~AGENDAS~OOO4CIPAgn,doc 07/07/99 Change the Priority from II to I on the Winchester Road Widening Project Change the Priority from I to II on the Rancho California Bridge Widening over Murrieta Creek The Community Services Commission and Old Town Advisory Committee also met in June to review the proposed Park and Redevelopment Agency projects. Both approved their respective projects. However, the Community Services Commission has requested that staff investigate the opportunities for making park and recreational improvements to the desiltation basin located at Rancho California Sports Park. On June 10, and June 29, 1999 the City Council held two workshops to review and discuss the proposed CIP. The feedback from both Commissions was presented to the City Council at both workshops. At the workshop of June 29 the City allocated $7.98 million from previously considered CIP projects, General Fund, Capital Project Reserves, and RDA funds. These changes have been reflected in the proposed document as directed by City Council at the workshop. These changes are as follows: Library Sports Complex Children's Museum Community Theater Master Trails Plan Rancho Calif. Sports Field Lighting Date & Cherry Street Total $2,000,000 93,710,000 91,000,000 9 650,000 9 70,000 move up 9 550,000 97,980,000 In addition, Staff has added the Butterfield Stage Park Improvements to the CIP. Originally, this project was anticipated to cost below $25,000, however responses to the City's request for proposal yielded a low bid of $43,735. In the prior year DIF funds were allocated in the amount of $25,000 to fund this project. Staff is proposing that the balance of 918,735 be funded by the TCSD Operation Budget. COSTS The total cost to complete the projects proposed in the CIP is 9268,786,095. Of this amount 947,320,695 in project costs is budgeted for FY 1999-00. A total of 101 projects are included in the program, consisting of 40 Circulation Projects, 21 Infrastructure/Other Projects, 28 Park Projects, and 12 Redevelopment Agency/Housing Projects. The following illustrates the associated costs for each project classification and total cost: Project Cost Circulation Project Infrastructure/Other Projects Parks Projects Redevelopment RDA/Housing Projects 9159,194,060 $ 71,842,400 9 24,544,435 9 13,205,200 R:WORTONL VAGENDAS~OOO4CIPAgn. doc 07/08/99 REVENUE Projected revenue from identified sources for the Five Year Capital Improvement Program is $116,781,325. Unspecified (unfunded) project costs for the five year program total $156,646,800. Included in this five year plan are 14 projects which currently fall into the "Future Years" category (more than five years), but warrant consideration and review in this document. These projects are proposed to be funded by both assessment districts and unspecified funds in future years for a total cost of $75,146,400, and is included in the total unspecified amount of $156,646,800. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2000-04 Five Year Capital Improvement Program establishes the project appropriations for FY 1999-00. Projects which do not have sufficient funds within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured. Attachments: Resolution 99- Draft Capital Improvement Program 2000-04 R:WORTONL~AGENDASAOOO4CIPAgn.doc 07/08/99 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2000-04 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 1999-2000 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula requires public infrastructure improvements in the areas of streets, highways, transportation facilities, parks, recreational facilities and public buildings and facilities; and WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital Improvements Program is necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2000-04 is hereby approved. A copy of the FY 2000-04 Program is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered relevant environmental factors. Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2000-04" included herein appropriations for FY 1999-00 is hereby adopted. Section 4. On June 2, 1999 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenCliture of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available. R:WOR TONL ~4GENDAS~OOO4CIPAgn. doc 07/08/99 That the City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between approved Capital Improvement Program projects. Ee Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 6. Councilmember Stone abstains with respect to projects within the Old Town area due to property ownership in Old Town Temecula. Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of July 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular th meeting thereof held on the 13 day of July, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:WOR TONL ~AGENDA S%OOO4CIPAg, n.doc 07/08/99 ITEM 3O TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINi CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Bill Hughes, Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer July 13, 1999 Staggered Work Hours RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: In an effort to reduce traffic congestion during "rush hours," the Public Traffic Safety Commission directed staff to explore implementation of a "staggered work schedule" with the coordination of major employers in the City. The preliminary research conducted for such a program would provide staff with (1) major employers in Temecula; (2) the number of employees employed by these employers; (3) shift start and stop times; and (4) location of the business relative to the I-15 Freeway. To gather data, staff prepared a simple phone survey requesting the aforementioned information. Of the top 30 Temecula employers surveyed, 24 responded. The results of the survey are provided in the attached graphs and tables. From the data collected, staff concludes that 77% of the Temecula major employers, or 4,100 employees, are already working a staggered work hour and/or multiple shift schedule. For the remaining employers, their 800 employees work single shifts. Those companies who are not working staggered work hours cite customer demands, supplies schedules, and distributor schedules as their reasons for not being able to implement alternative scheduling. In addition to the graphs depicting the multiple and single shift survey results, staff has put into a table format a 24-hour workday that illustrates the number of employees and the hours during which they are working. From this graph, it is clear that the greatest overlap occurs at 3:00 p.m., when approximately 1,112 employees are coming to or leaving work. In conclusion, approximately ~ of Temecula's major employers contribute to reducing traffic congestion during traditional "rush hours" by having staggered work hours and multiple shifts in place. This information was presented to the Public Traffic Safety Commission during their July 8, 1999 meeting. Any additional information received during this meeting will be presented to the Council during the oral report. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Multiple shift vs. Single shift graphs Summary of Top Employers Commuting Schedules 0 III /Ill II I/ Illll 0 ~ E C) 0 C) C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) t,O 0 '-,,,I ._~ 0 0 N CL ,,,cn ,n .....4 3' C.D 0 0 CD 0 0 0 C) < -.,.'TO 0 J~ t- 0 Z "'< "< Z .-< K I'rl ~ Z -< -< -< -< -< 0 (~, 0 0 0 0 ITEM 31 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager July 13, 1999 Approval of Ballot Question for Extension of City's Existing Hotel Tax (Transient Occupancy Tax) and Real Property Transfer Tax to Redhawk and Vail Ranch Annexation Area Prepared by: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-59, ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE R:City Cirk~Agenda Rpt%Redhawk2 071399 1 DISCUSSION: In response to requests from citizens within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities, the City Council initiated proceedings to annex those communities to the City of Temecula by adopting its Resolution No. 98-74 on July 28, 1998. Following a sedes of public hearings, the annexation was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) on Decamber 10, 1998. Approval of the annexation, however, was conditioned on the approval by the residents of the annexed territories of the City's taxes and the Temecula Community Services District's rates and charges pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 218. In accordance with the requirements of state law, the City mailed notice of the proposed annexation and the proposed taxes, rates and charges to each of the residents of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities, and the City Council conducted a public hearing on the annexation, taxes, rates and charges on March 23, 1999. At the conclusion of the public hearing, it was determined that there was no majority protest against the annexation, taxes, rates or charges, and therefore proceedings could continue. The next step in the annexation process is voter approval of the City's taxes and the TCSD's rates and charges pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 218. On June 22, 1999, the City Council approved ballot questions for the approval of the extension to the Redhawk/Vail Ranch annexation area of the existing Citywide special tax (adopted by the voters of the City as Measure C in 1997), which finances the maintenance, operation and servicing of public parks, recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City and the Temecula Community Services Distdct's rates and charges for the Redhawk/Vail Ranch annexation area. The City also currently levies a hotel tax (transient occupancy tax) and a real property transfer tax and all such transactions within the City of Temecula. The transient occupancy tax is established in Chapter 3.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code and at a rate of 8%. The real property transfer tax is established in Chapter 3.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code at a rate of $.27 for each $500.00 of the value of the transaction. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact associated with the annexation is fully addressed in the fiscal impact analysis conducted by the City, which analysis was previously presented to the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Negative Declaration addressing the impacts associated with the annexation was adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1998. ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 99- R:Cey C~kV~;enda Rpt~Re~hawk2 o713~e RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-59, ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On June 22, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-59 calling a special election to approve certain City taxes and Temecula Community Services Distdct rates and charges for the Vail Ranch and Redhawk annexation. The City Council now desires to add a measure to the ballot to provide for approval of the current City taxes upon transient occupancies and documentary transfers. Section 2. Section 3. of Resolution No. 99-59 is hereby amended to add the following proposition to be submitted to the voters: APPROVAL OF EXISTING CITY HOTEL (TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY) AND REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX (MAJORITY APPROVAL Yes REQUIRED): Shall the City's existing hotel (transient occupancy) tax as described in Chapter 3.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the existing real property transfer tax as described in Chapter 3.12 of the No Temecula Municipal Code be approved and extended to the Vail Ranch/Redhawk annexation area? R:Re~ol 99- 1 Section 3. Section 4. of Resolution No. 99-59 is hereby amended to add the following proposition to be submitted to the voters: APPROVAL OF EXISTING CITY HOTEL (TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY) AND REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX (MAJORITY APPROVAL Yes REQUIRED): Shall the City's existing hotel (transient occupancy) tax as described in Chapter 3.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the existing real property transfer tax as described in Chapter 3.12 of the No Temecula Municipal Code be approved and extended to the Vail Ranch/Redhawk annexation area? Section 4. Except for the additions to Resolution No. 99-59 set forth in this Resolution, all other terms of Resolution No. 99-59 shall remain in full force and effect and the added propositions shall be subject to the terms of Resolution No. 99-59. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 13th day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] 99- 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Coundl of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:Reloa 99- 3