Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout062999 CC/CSD/RDA Jnt. Workshop AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA A JOINT TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT/AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 29, 1999 - 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Councilman Roberts ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT/AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council/Community Services District/Redevelopment Agency on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. PUBLIC HEARING Approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction and operation of sports Field lightincl at James L. Day Middle School RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction of sports field lighting at James L. Middle School; RAAgenda\062999CIP 1 1.2 Direct staff to file the Mitigated Negative Declaration with the appropriate filing fee for the project with the County Clerk of Records Office. PRESENTATION Bi.q League Dreams Sports Park - Rick Odekirk (as requested by Mayor Pro Tem Stone) COUNCIL/DISTRICT/AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Review of the Proposed FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Pro.qram RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Review and discuss the proposed changes to the FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and provide direction to staff as appropriate. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, July 13, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R :~,ge nda\062999C I P 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors -~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services June 29, 1999 Approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction and operation of sports field lighting at James L. Day Middle School PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 1. Todd Holmes, Development Services Administrator That the Board of Directors: Approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction of sports field lighting at James L. Day Middle School. Direct staff to file the Mitigated Negative Declaration, with the appropriate filing fee, for the project with the County Clerk of Records Office. DISCUSSION: On May 29, 1999, the Board of Directors voted 3-0-1 not to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction of sports field lighting at James L. Day Middle School . At the June 10, 1999 Capital Improvement Program Workshop the City Council asked staff to bring this item back to the Board of Directors. The project was again posted for the public hearing, the notice was placed in the newspaper, and the notice was sent to all property owners that were noticed for the previous hearing. Eight parcels that did not receive notices for the prior headng were noticed for this hearing. Based upon the discussions in the Initial Environmental Study, staff has determined that the lighting project will have no significant impacts except in the area of light and glare. This potential impact will be mitigated through compliance with the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The proposed lighting system, the Musco Sports Lighting Total Light Control system, will comply with these requirements and is expected to reduce the impacts to the community by significantly decreasing glare, light spillage and skyglow. The hours of operation for the lights will be from dusk until 10 p.m. \\TEMEC_FS201 \DATAgEPTS\CSD~holmest\City Council Agenda Items~neg dec for jld middle sch Its.doc At the June 10, 1999 City Council meeting it was suggested that staff consider the installation of lights at the Chaparral High School facility for recreation purposes, instead of lighting the fields at James L. Day Middle School. After discussions with school district representatives, they indicated they are not in support of lighting fields at the high school facility because of the conflict that could arise as a result of the school's requirements for fields use and public recreation activities. Generally school athletic activities occur between the hours of 3:30 and 6:00 PM. This is the same time frame needed for recreation athletic leagues to set up and play. As a result, the James L. Day Middle School appears to be a better alternative. The James L. Day Middle School has approximately 14 acres of turfed ball fields for athletic use. By lighting these fields, we will be able to meet our communities growing recreational needs. The cost for installing the lights on these ball fields is approximately ~442,600. If the City were to acquire, design and construct a 14 acre park site with ball field lights, the cost would exceed $3,000,000. This is an outstanding opportunity for the City to get an additional 14 acres of parkland for a fraction of the construction cost and minimal maintenance responsibility. This project is very similar to lighting installation at Margarita Middle School. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that the cost for design and installation of the lighting system is ~442,600. Staff was recently informed of an approximately ~530,000 grant from Cal Trans for the mall traffic improvements, which will free an additional ~530,000 in Capital Project Reserves. Because staff just recently received this notification, this ~530,000 revenue source has not yet been programmed in the proposed Capital Improvement Program, and can be utilized to fund this project. The annual costs of operation and maintenance of this facility is estimated at $75,000. However, the City's share of the annual O&M is $25,000, which includes electricity and maintenance of one-half acre of perimeter landscaping. ATTACHMENTS: Public Hearing Notice Environmental Checklist Vicinity Map Site plan for James L. Day Middle School Project Sheet from the Capital Improvement Program for F.Y. 1999/2000 R:~holmest\City Council Agenda Items~neg dec for jld middle sch Its.doc Notice of Public Hearin~i THE CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the Community Services District to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: James L. Day Middle School Joint use and athletic field lighting project - Environmental Assessment No. 57 City of Temecula Community Services Department James L. Day Middle School, 40775 Camino Campos Verdes in Temecula, California To install light fbxtures at the previously approved athletic fields and establish a joint use program at James L. Day Middle School between the Temecula Community Services Department and the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Adopt a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 57 Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services Distdct before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in wdtten correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). Additional information on the Project may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Community Services Department, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Monday through Fdday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions conceming the project may be addressed to Phyllis Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services, City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589, or at (909) 694-6480. PLACE OF HEARING DATE OF HEARING TIME OF HEARING City Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 June 29, 1999 6:00 PM City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Zoning Description of Project lighting for the James L. Day Middle School athletic fields City'of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 'Stephen Brown, AICP (909) 694-6400 North General Kearny Road east of Margarita Road and west of La Colima Road. City of Temecula, Community Services Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589 Low Medium Residential Specific Plan Overlay (Campos Verdes) Installation of lighting and joint use of the James L. Day Middle School athletic field by the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Valley Unified School District. See attached Exhibit "A" for joint use area map. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Other public agencies whose approval is required Generally surrounded by vacant land. To the north vacant and residential uses 1000 feet from the site. To the east, vacant hills and single family residential further to the east. Vacant to the south with residential construction within 1500 feet of the project site. Vacant to the west, Promenade mall, further west across Margarita Road. None R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact': as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Planning Population and Housing Geologic Problems Water Air Quality Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources X Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature ""' ~' Date Printed name For R:\C EQA\EA57ies,doc 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Potentially PotentiallySignificant UnlessLess Than SignificantMitjgation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? c. X Comments: 1. all The installation of athletic field lighting will not conflict with applicable land use plans or policies adopted by any agencies or will the project divide a community or conflict with applicable habitat conservation plans. The proposed project anticipates the installation of lights and joint use for the James L. Day athletic fields, which is consistent with the existing school use. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 3 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Induce substantial population growth in-an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the × construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact X Comments: 2. all The addition of athletic field lighting and joint use will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections, induce substantial population growth, or displace any housing units. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Inco~orated Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? - X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X No Impact X X that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? d. X e. X Comments: 3. all The installation of athletic field lighting and joint use will not create or be affected by additional geologic problems. No significant effects are anticipated by this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a, co fo Issues and Supporting information Sources Violate any water quality standards-or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: 4.all The installation of lighting and joint use of the existing athletic fields will not affect any hydrologic or water quality issues. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No Impact X X X X X X X X X X R :\CEQA\EA57ies .doc AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: ao Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sourues Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria polLutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone-precursors? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? No Impact X X X Comments: 5.all Athletic field lighting and joint use will not affect area or regional air quality to any measurable degree. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R :\CEQA\EA57ies .doc 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: do Issues and Supporting Information Sources Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? -- Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emergency access? Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X Comments: 6.all The project will not result in significant increases in vehicle trips, traffic congestion, or increase the demand for roads or parking spaces. Adjacent roadways have sufficient capacity available and the middle school facility has 67 parking spaces on site that will be available during off-school times. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated because of this project. X X X X X X R:\CEQA\EA57ies,doc 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: ao Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact X d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? f. X Comments: 7.all James L. Day middle school is currently under construction and the entire site has been disturbed because of grading and building activity. As a consequence, the site is not considered habitat for any plant or wildlife species. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Issues and Supporting information Sources Result in the loss of availability of a knewn mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 8.all The project site is not located in an area of known mineral resources nor will the project result in the loss of locally-important mineral resources as none are identified in the General Plan for this area. No significant impacts are anticipated for this as a result of this project. No Impact X R :\CEQA\EA57ies .doc 10 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a, Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant impact Incorporated Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Create a significant hazard to the pub4ic or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Crate a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact X X c. X d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 9.all Athletic field lighting and joint use of the athletic field will not cause an increase in community hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 11 10. NOISE. Would the project result in: ao Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact X No Impact X Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? - For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X d. X e. X f. X Comments: 10.a,b,d. The proposal will result in an increase in the duration of the noise generated from the project site. The proposed use as a middle school will generate noise typical for this type of facility. The addition of athletic field lighting will increase the time the noise is generated into the evening by extending activities beyond the normal daylight hours. The lights are scheduled to be turned off by 10:00 p.m. every night and not to be utilized at all on Sunday nights. This practice corresponds with other lighted parks in Temecula. Provisions for amplified sound are a component of this assessment. Sound amplification equipment will be allowed to operated between 4:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday. Sound amplification will not be permitted on Sundays. The nearest homes are located approximately 1000 feet from the playing fields which will help reduce the impacts to the local residential communities. No significant impacts are anticipated for this project when the mitigation measures (restricted operating times) are followed. 10.e,f. The project site is not located within an airport land use area or near a private airport. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 12 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: a, Issues and Supporting Information Sources - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? Fire protection? Police protection? - Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact X No Impact X X X X Comments: 11 .all The project could have the potential for a slight increase in on-going maintenance and this will require some additional (and anticipated) expenditures by the City. This on-going maintenance will be contained within the Temecula Community Services Department budget and is expected to be minimal. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 13 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a, Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X X c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water X d. X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available-to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? e. X X X Comments: 12.all The project will not result in the need for new or expanded public utility systems. All utility systems are already available at the school site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 14 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic highway? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitjgation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact X X X No Impact X Comments: 13.a,b,c The project will not affect a scenic vista, damage scenic resources, or degrade the existing visual character of the site. The proposed use is consistent with the urban form anticipated for the development of this area. Given the intense urban uses surrounding the site (or anticipated to be built) the project is consistent with current and planned development. 13.d. While some additional onsite lighting is expected, the shielding of fixtures and the substantial distance from sensitive uses will eliminate any off-site illumination issues. The project will use specified lamps and observe hours of illumination that are consistent with the Palomar Lighting Policies of the General Plan and Ordinance 655. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 15 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X X X X Comments: 14.all The project will not have an impact on scientific resources noted above since the site has been disturbed by the construction of the middle school. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 16 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Issues and Suppomng Information Sources ~ Would the project increase the use of. existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require X the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incomorated Impact Impact X Comments: 15.all The project is expected to meet a portion of the existing community recreation needs. As a result, it will not increase the current or future demand for parks or other recreational facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 17 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Does the project have the potential to.degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of, restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: 16.a. 16.b. 16.c. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 18 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlieranalyses and state where they are available for review. 'limpacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. R:\CEQA\EA57ies.doc 19 School Site JAMES L. DAY MIDDLE SCHOOL SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING PROJECT VICINITY MAP (Not to Scale) JOINT USE FACILITIES JOINT USE FACILITIES 0 0 r~ 0 z i ! d 0 c c~ r- .,~ ('0 (D o ..~-,_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 011 000 OF °°°~ 000 000 ~dd~Hj .U). C o s 0 0 O-- APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~_ DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: City Council Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager June 29, 1999 Review of the Proposed FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~ Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: the FY 2000-04 Capital appropriate. That the City Council review and discuss the proposed changes to Improvement Program (CIP), and provide direction to staff as DISCUSSION: At the June 10, 1999 CIP City Council Workshop, staff received direction to identify a list of CIP projects that have uncommitted and unrestricted funding in an effort to find additional funding for other potential projects. Attachment one (1) contains the list of projects that have uncommitted and unrestricted funding. Also staff has put together a list of potential adjustments focusing on projects that could be unfunded and/or moved to later years without compromising the City's Circulation, Infrastructure and Park and Recreation needs. This proposed list of adjustments represents a total funding availability of $5,244,130 in year three (3) by the following funding sources: Capital Reserves DIF Parks Quimbv 82,336,530 $2,601,200 $306,400 Staff has reviewed current fund balance availability and has identified additional funding of $1,400,000 which is list below: General Fund Balance FY 1999-00 $1,000,000 Internal Service Fund $400,000 In total this proposal represents $6,644,130 in available revenue for a project or projects to be added to the CIP and constructed within the next three (3) years. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of the FY 2000-04 Five Year Capital Improvement Program at the July 13,1999 City Council meeting establishes the project appropriations for FY 1999-00. The total amount of reprogrammed dollars is $6,644,130, of which ~2,907,600 must be utilized for a park or recreational facility project because of the DIF Parks/Quimby funding source. The City's 30% General Fund reserves will remain intact and are not considered in this proposal. Attachments: (1) List of uncommitted and/or unrestricted funded projects (2) FY 2000-04 CIP potential adjustments (3) Potential Unfunded Projects Attachment ( 1 ) List of Uncommitted and/or Unrestricted Funded Projects 0 w Ow 0 _ LU 0 0 0 z 0 t- w w tY I- ¢) · 0 'O 0 I'-- iii C) u. 0 C,) ~ (rn n u_ U_:g m ui U3 ui Ill ILl ILl LI, LL I~) l~1 I'-.- ~4 ~ I'~ Attachment (2) FY 2000-04 CIP Potential Adjustments 1999 - 2004 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POTENTIAL ADJUSTMENTS Capital Reserves Unfunded Projects Localized Storm Drain Improvements Jefferson Avenue Street Lighting La Paz Street Widening from Ynez Rd to 79 South Rancho California Rd East of Meadows Parkway Winchester Rd Widening Projects Moved to DIF Street Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Rancho Calif & Winchester Murrieta Creek Bridge Crossing North of Winchester lid Pala Rd Improvements - Phase II $ 235,000 $ 300,000 $ 80,000 $ 70,000 $ 250,000 $ 370,000 $ 370,000 $ 650,000 DIF Street Unfunded Projects Jefferson Median from Santa Gertrudis to Rancho Calif Pauba Rd improvements - Phase II (Const) $530,000 $544,600 DIF Park & Rec / Quimby Unfunded Projects Margarita Community Park- Phase II ($15,000 Quimby) Park Security Lighting Parkview Park Site ($291,400 Quimby) Rotary Park Expansion Projects Moved to later Years (Funded) Parkview Tennis Courts Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting * Rancho Calif Sports Park North/South Fields Parking Lot Trails Master Plan Trash Enclosures at Various Parks $924,000 $375,000 $481,300 $481,000 $480,000 (FY03-04) $420,000 (FY01-02) $ .54,000 (FY02/03) ~ 70,000 (FY02-03) $ 74,000 (FY02-03) * Estimated Project Cost Was Reduced by $100,000 Attachment (2) 1 Available Funding - CIP: Capital Reserves DIF Park & Rec Quimby Total Other Available Funding: Fund Balance (as~of 6/30/00) Internal Service Fund Total Total Available Funding for a Project 3 Years $2,336,530 $2,601,200 $ 306,400 $5,244,130 $1~000,000 $ 400,000 $1,400,000 $6~644,130 Attachment (3) Potential Unfunded Projects Potential Unfunded Projects DIF Park/Quimby Sports Complex (Const Only) Performing Arts Center Children's Museum* Community Theater* Cost Other Available $ 6.0 Mil None $6.6 Mil $ 5.0 Mil $1.0 Mil $6.6 Mil $ 1.2 Mil $ 568 K** $6.6 Mil $ 2.0 Mil $1.56Mi1'** $6.6 Mil Without DIF Park/Quimby Library Conference Center Civic Center (Land Acquisition Only) Date and Cherry Street (Land Acquisition) 795 Ultimate Interchange (Land Acquisition) $10.2 Mil $1.6 Mil $ 4 to 8 Mil None $ 2.2 Mil $1.3 Mil $3.7 Mil $3.7 Mil $3.7 Mil $ 1.1 Mil $ 550 K $3.7 Mil $ 7.0 Mil None $3.7 Mil * Assumes use of Mercantile Building ** Available funding of $568,000 from RDA *** $1 Mil Donation and $568,000 from RDA Attachment (3)