The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About021799 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 1999 Ca' ' TO Cerf, B The City of Ternecula Planning Commission conven~ in 8 regullr meGling It 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, Fen/17, 1999, in the City Council Chainbern of Temecula City Hall, 432(X) AU ROLL CALL Present Com~ Naggar, Webster, and Quirtnan Guentero. Absent Also Present: Pinning Manager Ubrmke. Attorney Cudey, Assistant Planner Andam, and Minute Clerk Hansan. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments, CQ Mk K MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agencla. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the ~cep00n of Commissioner ~}ltysiak who was absent 2. A~mV~I of Minutes - January 20, laJ4Li9 It was noted that page 7, paragraph 2 should reflect Commissioner NagOafs recommerglsUon, that in addition to staff, additional review of ~he C. jty's Impact Development Monitoring Program be solely reviewed by the Planning Commission. MQTIQN: Commissioner Nagger moved to aplxove the minutes, as amended, The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster end voice vote reflected unenlmous approval wOh the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent. PUBI IG HFa, RINGS 3. Plannlnl~ Fie. PA9~0446 IC4tMl!Honal Use Ptl~lt) Request to dedgn, e~metru~ and opeats an 22,007 square foot aMmaeve ~ living ~ ai'tl Airhelmet Pare floility with an, odat~l paddug aM ~andse. a~s~ as~ a & ~ a~ ~ RFCOMMFNpATIQN It is mcmmawnded by the Planning De~ that the Planning Commission approve the request. park-Hke setting; advised that staff was in agreement with the applicant~s request to have Condition 14o. 87 de4eted, regarding Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) reoommerdaUons; for Commissioner Webster, specified the stucco coloring, regarding b~e trim, window treatment, and building colors; for Cornm~ Nag0ar, noted thlt Ihe vast amount of deliveries received at this site will be small-scab tnjck deliveries; relayed that since the applicant does not own the adjacent property, this particular project cannot be conditioned to landscape the open-space am Kljacentto the site; and c/rffied the fencing on the site plan, Mr. David Lutich, mlxesenUng the appgcflt, presented the 17-year histxW o1' the applicant's role in assisted-flying cam facilities, specifying what assiste~ encompasses; clarified the preference to develop this type of facity in · residential area in order to ate a home-like setting for the guests; specHkKI the interior and extedor deigns; relayed, for Commissioner Naggar, the Iocadion, dimensions, and type of lighting at the site; noted that with regard to the open space area, it is the applicant's desire that this particular am be landscaped; for Commissioner Webster, clarified that the roof matedad would be concrete Ules; for Chairman Guerdero, noted that, generally, the medicinal administration would be see-administered, relaying that licensing will determine whether injections will be administered; clarified the disposal of the injection needles, and the laundering procedures at the facility; and relayed the specific building design and slaff training designed to eliminate the wandering of residents. Chairman Guerdero, echoed by Commissiorar Naggar, commended the applicant for bdnging this much-rmeded type of facility to the City of Temecul8. Deputy 0ireclot of Public Works Parks confirmed, kw Commissioner Webster, that Mar;adta and Pauba Roads are cuffentJy developed to full width along this property, and that them is a proposed light to be installed at Pauba and Mm~rita Roads; noted that this particular project has been ~ to paflkipate in the funding of the raised median on Maf~arita Road fronting the site; for Commissioner Nqlgar, darled that allhough there will be no designated left-tum into this project, there will be a dedicated M-turn motion from Margarila Road to Pauba Road, noting that at PBuba Road them will be a fulNenglh intersection; and mlayecl that currently, there is consideration to design Margadla Road to full widlh (from hula Road to 79 South), noting, however, that curmrttly funding for this project is unavailable. In response to Mr. Elilets comments, Commisloner N~gg&r specified lhe kxa~ of lhe 24- inch boxed lmes lininglhe pe~melm*ot'the tmsh m. Mr. Egler relyed adesire to be~sumd trees at the site; and mlByed his primary corKam as the neOmtive visual effect of the roof equipment from his property. Assistant Planner Anders relayed 8ssurmx~, for Mr. Racicot, regarding the enclosure of the roof equipment recommended that there be assurance the glare would not be intnasive to the adjacent neighbors; and with regard to deliveries, relayed · desire to restrict the Umin9 of delivedes. Commissioner Webster commented with respect to the mise<l issues of concem, as follows: regarding the lighting. relayed that the existhl Mount Pdomar ~ reslficiions adequately address the issue; regarding the trash area, noted that the Design Guidefines address this issue; regarding the open-space easement am of concern, relayed that this particular area is an off-site issue, recommending that no conditions be placed upon this project; regarding the traffic signal, relayed that since the signal is currently proposed, the issue does not need to be re-addressed; noted that adequate traffic measures have been provided in area, relaying lhat the primary traffic problem in the area of discussion is poor driving; regarding the roof, (sped~ny the hehaht mU sk~pe ) noted that the desert is consistent wfh b'm Specmc Plan, recommending that no modifications be made; regarding the decelem~ lane on regarding deliveries to the fadlit,/, relayed that sinm them is no high traffic impact associated deliveries. Chairman Guerriero mcomrnefxled fvKxWying the language in Condition 36(b) to reflect the word when instead of the word ~ relayed a desire for m traffic invesUgBtion to determine whether or not a left-rum (west) on Pauba Road is rmcxeaary; and concurr~ with Commissiormr Naggafs comments, that 8 Ume re~b ictkx~ be enforced with regard to deliveries. In response ~o Commi,nioner Naggar's comments, lhe applkant's mlxesentaUve expressed that the 8pplicant would be agreeshie to the restriction of commerciBI vehicle deliveries (specifically, larger than 24 feeq befom T:OO A. M. and after g:00 P. M. Chairman Guerriero thanked the public for their input. Assistant Planner Anders advised that since the project is going to be permitted by the City, that the timing of the Conditions be modified, per City policy. MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; adopt Resolution No. 99- 005 approving Planning Application No. PA98-0446 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and adopt Environmental Addendum No. 2 to the previously certified ~Environmental Impact Report (EIR No. 235), and make the finding that a subsequent EIR is not required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Section 15162. RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0446 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN ND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 22,850 SQUARE FOOT ALTERNATIVE SENIORS LIVING SERVICES AND ALZHEIMER CARE FACILITY WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 3.22 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 955-t50-027. Add modify the language in Condition 36(b) to reflect the word when instead of the word if that the trash enclosure area comply with the Design Guidelines that bike lane striping be added, per the City Traffic Engineer recommendation that commercial deliveries (larger than 24 feet) be restricted after 9:00 P. M. and before 7:00 A. M Delete Condition No. 87 (regarding Riverside Transit recommendations) that the Conditions of Approval be amended, regarding the Public Works portion of the Conditions, per City policy The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent. PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed, for Commissioner Naggar, that the crosswalk at Margarita Road was scheduled to be removed on February 16, 1999. ADJouRNFNT At 7:23 P.M. Chairman 6uerdero formadly acUoumed this meeting to WE4;li~I;~LY, Marctl ;. 1999, at 6:00 P.M., in h C. Aty Cotwtd Chambers, 43200 Business Perk Ddve, TNnecul8.