The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About102400 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADATt e AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE OCTOBER 24, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City. The following case/claim will be discussed: 1) Juliet Anne Boysen. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning acquisition of interests in real property (being a division of Parcels 3, 4, and 5 of Parcel Map No. 28657-1 as shown by Map on file in Book 193 of Parcel Maps, page 64-67 and Parcel A of Lot Line Adjustment No. PA00-0051.) The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and Kearny Real Estate Company. Under negotiation is the price and terms of payment of the real property interests to be acquired. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and Jim O'Grady. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning acquisition of real property approximately three (3) acres of La Serena Way Park property (APN 953-050-001). The negotiating p~rties are the City of Temecula and the Temecula Unified School District. Under negotiation is the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and Jim O'Grady. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 (b) with respect to three matters of potential litigation. With respect to such matters, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. R:~Agenda\102400 1 CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2000-13 Resolution: No. 2000-71 Mayor Jeff Stone Ellie Macdonald Member Ciera Saunders of Baha'i Community of Temecula Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Introduction of Cor Bekkerin,q from Sister City Voorburq Certificate of Achievement to Christiaan Johnson for attaining Eagle Scout rank Proclamation for Circus Chimera Week Winter Weather and Flood Preparedness Week Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. Bob Larson from Guidant PUBLIC COMMENTS A'total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. R:~Agenda\102400 2 2 3 4 5 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Extension of Contract for Bankinq Services RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve a four-year extension of the City's contract for banking services with Union Bank of California; 3.2 Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to execute all necessary agreements. Award of Construction Contract for the Pala Road Brid.qe Soundwall Project - Proiect No. PW97-15SW RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Award a contract for Pala Road Bridge Soundwall - Project No. PW97-15SW - to R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. for a base amount of $320,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $32,000 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Purchase of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize the purchase of 165 licenses of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Suite from MicroAge of Sacramento for the total amount of $32,435.55. R:~Agenda\102400 3 7 Adoption of Resolution denying Planning Application No. 99-0317 - Temecula Ridge Apartments (located on the south side of Rancho California Road, southeast of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Mora.qa Road - approximately 20.88 net acres) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0317 AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0317, WHICH CONSISTS OF AN APPLICATION FOR A 246-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011) Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 2000-12 (Margarita Village Specific Plan) RECOMMENDATION 7.1 Adopt a ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0261 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 5) TO AMEND THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN'S DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR VILLAGE B RELATED TO THE SIZE AND VARIATION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS TO BE BUILT IN PLANNING AREAS 8 AND 10/11/12 GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD OFF PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF PARDUCCI LANE, AND NORTH OF RUE JADOT CONSISTING OF ALL LOTS IN TRACT NOS. 23100-6, -7, AND -8 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~Agenda\102400 4 TEMECULA COMMUNI~SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2000-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2000-17 CALL TO ORDER: President JeffComerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 26, 2000. 2 Award of Construction Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project Project No. PW00-01 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award a contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project - Project No. PW00-01 - to Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing for $104,888.16 and authorize the President to execute the contract; 2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $10,488.82 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. R:~Agenda\102400 5 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, November 14, 2000, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\102400 6 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2000-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2000-07 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLLCALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda er on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. VVhen you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 26, 2000. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, November 14, 2000, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\102400 7 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 8 Rancho Highlands Drive General Plan Amendment (Planning Application No. PA99-0451) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA99-0451; 8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE FROM OPEN SPACE TO HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451) Planning Application No. PA99-0261 - Zoninq Amendment, Map Chan.qe, and Plannin.q Application No. PA99-0371 - General Plan Amendment - Temecula Creek Villa.qe Project RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Receive the Subcommittee's verbal report and provide the appropriate direction. COUNCIL BUSINESS 10 Community Services Funding Program Committee Recommendations for Fiscal Year 2000-01 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Review and approve the 2000-01 Community Service Funding Program grants per the committee's recommendation of 43 organizations totaling $160,000; 10.2 Approve an operating transfer of $10,000 from the unallocated Capital Reserves. R:~Agenda\102400 8 11 Holiday Schedule for City Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Direct the City Clerk to set the schedule for City Council meetings during the holiday season and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements of the Government Code. 12 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Appointment RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission through October 10, 2003. 13 Consideration of Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (Placed on the agenda by Councilman Pratt) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Consider steps as recommended by Councilmember Pratt in his report dated October 10, 2000, Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan. 14 SATISFY 2020 Implementation Committee Agreement for the development of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee in Southwestern Riverside County RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the Implementation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 14.2 Appoint a Councilmember and alternate to the Implementation Committee that will be formed pursuant to the agreement. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, November 14, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\102400 9 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 0 ~= .~ 'u := ~ 0 ~ :> · ~o ~ 0 o o ~ ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,375,149.14 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 24TM day of October, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Resos 2000- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OFTEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of October, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Resos 2000* CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10112/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10~24/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10/12/00 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 10/~/00 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 195 192 193 194 195 210 261 28O 3OO 32O 33O 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEr-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY~IP INSURANCE FUND INFORIVtATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 100 165 190 192 193 194 280 300 32O 330 340 O~lE R~ SHAWN GENERAL FUND RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-ClP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: _SON, CITY MAI~GER $ 218,420.91 387,344.08 549,623.81 219,760.34 334,769.52 148,326.73 143,597.28 28,695.15 32,688.11 405.09 406,811.27 3,192.50 15,473.34 4,760.10 17,126.53 3,107.54 15,385.64 3,958.00 37,335.67 55.21 491.95 1,816.30 741.69 6,021.66 4,026.61 219,760.34 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 10/05/00 11:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[OOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 0 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 0 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 59,762.20 13,171.93 26,980.54 11.66 3,797.93 98.63 77,959.20 10,966.53 1,804.59 12,331.90 204.27 11,331.53 TOTAL 218,420.91 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1 10/05/00 11:01 CITY OF TEMECULA VO~JCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCNER/ CHECK NUMBER 64856 64857 CHECK DATE 10/05/00 10/05/00 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 003445 A P I FUND FOR PAYROLL PREPARING FOR YR-END CF:11/08 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC CELLULAR PHONE SVCB:POLICE DPT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-140'999'5261 001'170'999'5208 ITEM AMOUNT 319.00 213.92 CNECK AMOUNT 319.00 213.9E 64858 64859 64860 64860 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 ADKISSON-FLOHRv CANDICE 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE REIMB:HIGH HOPES PRGM SUPPLIES MAR/JUL INSPECTION SVC:R.C/I15 CITY LIMITS BLQOD DRAWS-PD/CHP CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP 190-183-999-5320 210-165-601-5801 001-170-999-5328 001-170-999-5328 72.38 641.53 21.00 377.00 72.38 641.53 398.00 64861 64862 6/*863 64863 64863 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ARNOLD, LOREEN 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER PUB:PRINCIPLES SMART ECONOMIC REFUND: LEVEL 1 SWIM LESSONS BOTTLED WTR SVCS: MNTC FAC BOTTLED WTR SVCS: CRC BOTTLED WTR BVCS: CITY HALL 001-161-999-5228 190-186-4970 340-199-701-5250 190-182-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 39.32 25.00 135.21 70.66 203.66 39.32 25.00 409.53 64864 64865 64866 64866 64867 64868 64868 64869 64870 64870 64871 64871 64872 64872 64872 64872 64872 64872 64872 6/*872 6/*872 64872 64872 64872 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C BANGERT, WILLIAM 004067 BEATY, RYAN C 004067 BEATY, RYAN C 004176 004176 000901 004248 004248 BRAVO, ERIKA BROADWING BROADWING CPRS CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A CNEMICON INTERNATIONAL CHEMICON INTERNATIONAL 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CNEBNERB CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EHBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOH EMBR~ID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHEBHERB CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESNERB CUSTOM EMBROID 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMGROID 003940 CNESHERS CUSTOH EMBROID MEMBERSNIP:MCKEON,B. 59804583 REFUND: EXCURSION-PADRES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND: EXCURSION-PADRES CPE EQUIPMENT FOR INTERNET SVC LONG DISTANCE & INTERNET CHRGE WKSHP & ROOEO:lO/26:MNTC STAFF CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP CREDIT:HEMET LIMITS-BLOOD DRAW REFD: SECURITY DEPST/RENTAL REFD: SECURITY DEPST/RENTAL SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKETS SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKETS SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKETS SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKETS SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKETS SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKETS FREIGNT FREIGNT FREIGHT FREIGHT FREIGHT FREIGHT 001-162-999-5214 190-183-4986 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-4986 320-1970 320-199-999-5208 190-180-999-5261 001-170-999-5328 001-170-999-5328 190-183-4989 190-2900 190-180-999-5250 001-162-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-164-601-5250 001-165-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-162-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-164-601-5250 001-165-999-5250 43.00 21.00 52.00 104.00 42.00 1,818.82 1,773.22 100.00 1,505.00 175.00- 62.00 100.00 655.00 393. O0 262. O0 131.00 655.00 262.00 13.89 8.33 5.56 2.78 13.89 5.56 43.00 21.00 156.00 42.00 3,592.04 100.00 1,330.00 162.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 10/05/00 11:01 VOUCRER/CH~CK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 64872 10/05/00 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROIO FREIGHT 001-165-999-5250 .01- 64872 10/05/00 003940 CNESNERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 190-180-999-5250 50.75 64872 10/05/00 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 001-162-999-5250 30.45 64872 10/05/00 003940 CRESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 001-161-999-5250 20.30 64872 10/05/00 003940 CHEBHERS CUSTOM EMSROID SALES TAX 001-163-999-5250 10.14 64872 10/05/00 003940 CHESHERB CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 001-164-601-5250 50.75 64872 10/05/00 003940 CHESNERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 001-165-999-5250 20.30 64872 10/05/00 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 001-165-999-5250 .06 64873 10/05/00 001193 COMP U S A INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 221.05 64874 10/05/00 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET DOCK STN W/ACCESSORIES:ENG ~ 001-171-999-5604 1,206.53 64874 10/05/00 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET LABOR AND SHIPPING COSTS 001-171-999-5604 900.00 64874 10/05/00 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET SALES TAX 001-171-999-5604 93.51 64074 10/05/00 000447 COMTROMIX OF NEMET ANTENNA INSTALL @ CRC RECEPTN 320-199-999-5209 826.38 64875 10/05/00 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS GEOTECH SVCS:PAVEMENT MGMT SYB 210-165-655-5804 666.00 64876 10/05/00 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC TRAFFIC MASTER CENSUS PRGM 001-164-602-5250 3,800.00 64876 10/05/00 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC TRAFFIC SPEED/VOLUME COUNT 001-1(~4-602-5250 225.00 64877 10/05/00 003189 CRAFTOM RILLS COLLEGE FIRE INSPEC ACADEMY:N.MANSILLA 001-171-999-5261 153.00 64878 10/05/00 004003 CRISP, ALBERT K. WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR SEPT 001-1182 1.75- 64878 10/05/00 004003 CRISP, ALBERT K. SEPT ENGINEER CONSULTANT:PW 001-163-999-5248 600.00 64879 10/05/00 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS 001-164-601-5218 31.45 64880 10/05/00 003511 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATI DELL INSPIRON NOTEBOOK COMPUTE 001-170-999-5604 2,266.00 64880 10/05/00 003511 DELL COMPUTER COMPOMATI SALES TAX 001-170-999-5604 175.65 RES IMPR PRGM:~HLOM,TIMOTHY 165-199-813-5804 64881 10/05/00 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING 2,300.00 64882 10/05/00 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 118.63 64882 10/05/00 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO CREDIT:BILLING ERROR 001-164-601-5218 19.26- 64883 10/05/00 001380 64883 10/05/00 001380 64883 10/05/00 001380 64883 10/05/00 001380 64883 10/05/00 001380 64883 10/05/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 64884 10/05/00 64885 10/05/00 64885 10/05/00 TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 SALAZAR TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 HILLBERG TEMP NELP W/E 09/22 LUQUE TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 LUQUE TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 EBON 001-162-999-5118 929.60 165-199-999-5118 2,075.55 340-199-701-5118 853.20 340-199-702-5118 284.40 340-199-701-5118 340.20 340-199-702-5118 113.40 REFSHMNTS:TRANSIT MTG:09/27/O0 001-110-999-5260 REFSHMNTS:USER FEE MTG 8/28 001-110-999-5260 REFSHMNTS: 9/26/00 COUNCIL MTG 001-100-999-5260 002517 ERNIE B~S RESTAURANT 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 32.00 134.11 187.87 2,590.75 221.05 3,026.42 666.00 4,025.00 153.00 598.25 31.45 2,441.65 2,300.00 99.37 4,596.35 32.00 321.98 64886 10/05/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE PALA RD MEDIAN LDSCP CLEAN-UP 210-165-631-5804 925.00 64886 10/05/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE SEP LDSCP SVCS: CRC 190-182-999-5415 1,444.00 64886 10/05/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE SEP LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER 190-181-999-5415 361.00 VOUCHRE2 10/05/00 VOOCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64886 64886 64886 64886 64886 64886 64887 64888 64889 64890 64891 64892 64893 64894 64895 64896 64897 64898 64898 64898 64899 64900 64900 64900 64900 64900 64901 64902 64903 64904 64904 64904 11:01 CHECK DATE 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 002832 FENCE BUILDERS 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M 004016 FORD, STEVE 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 000177 GOETZ, JAMES R. 003637 GOLF WEST CONSTRUCTION 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 003640 001609 001609 001609 ITEM DESCRIPTION SEP LDSCP SVCS: CITY HALL SEP LDSCP SVCS: TCC SEP LDSCP SVCS: STN 84 SEP LDSCP SVCS:PRKLOT 6TH ST SEP LDSCP SVCS: OLD TWN SEP LDSCP SVCS: MUSEUM RES IMPR PRGM:NICHOLS,J & K PRELIMINARY TITLE REPT:NW SPT FIRST AID FOR TIDWELL,RODNEY RE-ISSUE CK 60260:REIMB MTG DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - PLANNING GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES -POLICE DEPT REFD:CITATION 26935/COURT FEES SAND TO REPLENISH TOT LOTS:PRK AUG PRGSS:PALA GRDG PW97-15 GRANT.GENERAL CONTRAGTO REFD:DEPST LD99-O65GR PM19580 GRAYNER ENGINEERING SEP DESIGN SVC:MERCANTILE BLDG GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING- CABOOSE GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING-SATELLITE OFF GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING- CABOOSE 000520 H D L COREM & CONE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 1NC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 002372 HARMON, JUDY 002906 HEMET FENCE COMPANY HOFFMANN, NENA 000193 ! G M A 000193 I C M A 000193 ! C M A CAFR STATISTICAL SECTION PKGE HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES -HGHLD FENCE HARDWARE SUPPLIES -TRAFFIC DIV TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS RES IMPR PRGM:SZYMANSKI,HELEN REFUND: EXCURSION-PADRES 2000 MUNI YR BOOK W/CD ROM:CH SHIPPING & HANDLING SALES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-185-999-5415 165-199-813-5804 210-190-17~-5802 001-150-999-5250 001-100-999-5260 001-161-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-170-4055 190-180-999-5212 210-165-631-5804 001-2670 210-190-167-5802 001-170-999-5250 001-170-999-5229 001-170-999-5250 001-140-999-5248 340-199-701-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 001-164-602-5242 190-183-999-5330 165-199-813-5804 190-183-4986 001-110-999-5228 001-110-999-5228 001-110-999-5228 ITEM ~J4OUNT 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 1,542.00 400.00 170.55 64.63 27.11 275.67 350.00 525.00 64f936.00 400.00 78.75 75.00 81.00 75.00 100,00 188,37 372.54 397.64 770.73 11.34 292.00 375.00 21.00 159.95 15.00 10.85 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 5,386.00 1,542.00 400.00 170.35 64.63 27.11 275.67 350.00 525.00 64,936.00 400.00 78.75 251.00 100.00 1,740.62 292.00 375.00 21,00 165.80 VOUCHRE2 10/05/00 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64905 64906 64907 64908 64909 64910 64911 64912 64913 64914 64915 64916 64917 64917 64917 64917 64917 64918 64918 64918 64918 64919 64920 64920 64920 64920 64920 64920 64920 64920 64921 64922 64922 11:01 CHECK DATE 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME INSURANCE SERVICES OFFI 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL 004173 JOBTRAK CORPORATION 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN 003986 KEVIN COZAD & ASSOCIATE KINGMAN, ~CK 000206 KINKOS IRC KNOX COHPANY KROSKY, KEN 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC 004051 L 0 R OEOTECHNICAL GROU LEDESMA, MAX 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT IRC 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC 004087 LOWE'S 004087 LOWE~S 004087 LOWE~S 004087 LOWE~S CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION FIRE SUPPRESSION RATING SCHED POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS JOB AD:ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN BIOLOGICAL BVCB:PALA BRDG PRJT SEPT DESIGN SVCS:PALA BRDG RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT OVRSIZE COPIES FOR 8/28/00 MTG FIRE DEPT ACCESS BOX FOR MALL REFUND: EXCURSION'PADRES MISC LDSCP & MNTC SUPPLIES GEOTECH SVCS:IST ST EXTENSION REFUND: LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS CRC POOL DIGI-FLO WATER METER THOROPATCH DECK/CONCRETE PATCH DECK JOINT FILLER Tm PART FREIGHT SALES TAX HARDWARE SUPPLIES -FIRE DEPT HARDWARE SUPPLIES - FIRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES -FIRE STN 84 SALES TAX 001689 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS REL.RETENTION:FLASHING BEACONS 004141 MAINTEX IRC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX IRC 004141 MAINTEX IRC 004141 ~L~INTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX IRC 004141 MAIRTEX INC SR CENTER CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES T.V. MUSEUM CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES MNTC FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES VAR.PARKS CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: MITCHELL 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS JUL SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVCS 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS AUG SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVCS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5228 190-186-999-5250 001-150-999-5254 210-165-631-5801 210-165-631-5802 300-199-999-5207 001-110-999-5222 001-171-999-5242 190-183-4986 001-164-601-5218 280-199-807-5804 190-1~-4970 190-186-999-5212 190-186-999-5212 190-186-999-5212 190-186-999-5212 190-186-999-5212 001-171-999-5212 001-171-999-5212 001-171-999-5212 001-171-999-5212 001-2035 190-181-999-5212 190-185-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-180-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 165-199-813-5804 190-187-999-5250 190-187-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 56,57 106.67 195.00 539.85 890.00 1,676.31 70.04 90.81 42.00 45.18 10,360.00 25.00 459.31 84.50 46.50 17.67 45.75 24.11 77.39 280.44 21.73 417.50 206,98 153.75 171.80 115.55 188.82 194.23 84.60 316.96 900.00 990.00 3,564.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 56.57 106.67 195.00 539.85 890.00 1,676.31 70.04 90.81 42.00 45.18 10,360.00 25.00 653.73 403.67 417.50 1,432.69 900.00 4,554.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 10/05/00 11:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64923 64924 64925 64926 64926 64927 64928 64929 64930 64930 64930 64930 64930 64931 64932 64933 64934 64934 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 64935 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL 003964 003964 002105 002668 NACTHMANN, LARRY NEW COVENANT FELLOWSHIP OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OMEGA LAKE SERVICES ORGANIZED EXECUTIVE 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN 002297 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONS 004284 PARTNERS IN DESIGN 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA 003218 PELA 003218 PELA 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 PERB EMPLOYEES/ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES/ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PRES EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PRES EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES/ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES/ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES/ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS ~MPLOYEES' RETIRE ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMB:BUCKETS-FIRE EXPLORERS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT OCT DUCK POND WATER MAINT SVCS ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:M.NORRIS SHOEI MOTORCYCLE HELMET SEPARATE MIKE KIT MOTOR INTERFACE KIT FREIGHT BALES TAX JUL-AUG~O0 CONSULT SVC:CHD MUS SOFTBALL AWARDS WINTER/SPRING EMP RECOGN. SUPPLIES AUG LDSCP PLAN CHECK SVCS-TCSD AUG LDSCP PLAN CHECK SVCS-TCSD 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS-PRE 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5258 001-171-999-5235 190-2900 001~140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-165-999-5214 190-180-999-5250 001-171-999-522B 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 210-190-165-5804 190-187-999-5313 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5248 193-180-999-5248 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 ITEM AMOUNT 827.31 125.00 100.00 12.37 19.20 222.62 800.00 97.00 290.00 585.00 385.00 29.52 94.94 3,730.00 1,093.57 114.49 1,800.00 2,655.00 25,689.59 471.71 4,634.26 11.61 370.66 98.27 222.66 127.82 1,066.72 202.88 579.74 167.16 88.59 1.17 18.42 .05 1.54 .36 .69 .46 3.72 CHECK AMOUNT 827.51 125.00 100.00 31.57 222.62 800.00 97.00 1,384.46 3,730.00 1,093.57 114.49 4,455.00 VOUCHRE2 10/05/00 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 64935 64935 64936 64936 64936 64936 64936 64936 64936 64937 64938 64939 64940 64941 64942 64943 64944 64944 64945 64946 64947 64947 64940 64949 64950 64951 64952 64953 64954 64955 11:01 CHECK DATE 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 004283 PRO MOTIONS 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA 000981 R H F INC RAMIREZ, GENEVIEVE ITEM DESCRIPTION 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO.:O.T.PRK LOT 003517 REBEL EQUIPMENT RENTAL SAND FOR HOT SUMMER NIGHTS 000526 REGENTS OF UNiVERSiTY 0 TREE PRUNING CLASS:11/16:M.W. ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-2390 340-2390 210-190-176-5802 210-190-170-5802 001-110-999-5260 001-111-999-5270 001-164-601-5218 001~171-999-5261 001-171-999-5261 PA EQUIP RENTAL:9/O9:SMR NITES 280-199-999-5362 6-26-7/30/00 DSGN SVC:PAUBA RD 210-165-606-5802 RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT 001-170-999-5215 REFUND: EXCURSION ' PADRES 190-183-4986 210-165-828-5804 280-199'999-5362 190-180-999-5261 000353 RiVERSiDE CO AUDITOR 000353 RiVERSiDE CO AUDITOR AUG ~00 PRK CITATION ASSESSMNT 001-2260 AUG ~00 PRK CiTATiON ASSESSMNT 001-2265 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE WEED ABATE LIEN REL.RECORD FEE 001-120-999-5250 003001 003001 004270 000793 003492 ROBBINS, VIRGINIA ROSS FENCE COMPANY ROSS FENCE COMPANY RUFFIAN SPECIALTIES SALDANA, lO,THY REFUND: EXCURSION - PADRES 190-183-4986 RES IMPRV PRGM: MILLS 165-199-813-5804 RES IMPRV PRGM: PINO 165-199-813-5804 ID TAGS FOR FiRE EXPLORER BAGS 001-171-999-5235 REFUND: ARTS/CRAFTS-CARTOONiNG 190-183-4982 SCANTRON FPC CORPORATIO SCANMARK ANNUAL MAINT AGRMNT SCHOLASTIC SPORTS SCHWEIGER, JEANNE SCOTT, MARGARET 004271 SEANOA SCREEN 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA 320-199-999-5215 TVHS 2000 FALL SPRTS POSTER AD 001-100-999-5250 REFUND: EXERCiSE-PRENATAL YOgA 190~183-4982 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT SWEATSHIRTS FOR FIRE EXPLORERS SEP AQUATIC POOL MAINT @ TES 190-2900 001-171-999-5235 190-186-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 1.39 2.65 45.45 17.02 30.00 49.50 18.74 21.00 21.00 200.00 4,998.93 65.11 21.00 90.67 183.18 144.00 1,964.00 770.00 40.00 21.00 2,745.00 2,761.50 258.60 34.00 678.00 259.00 40.00 100.00 332.94 570.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 33,762.12 202.71 200.00 4,998.93 65.11 21.00 90.67 183.18 144.00 2,734.00 40.00 21.00 5,506.50 258.60 34.00 678.00 259.00 40.00 100.00 332.94 570.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 10/05/00 11:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 64956 64956 64957 64958 64959 64960 64960 64960 64960 64960 64960 64960 64961 64962 64962 64962 64963 64964 64965 64965 64965 64966 64967 64968 64969 64970 64971 64972 64972 64972 64972 64972 64972 64972 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10105/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 10/05/00 IO/05/O0 10/05/00 10/05/00 003484 SIERRA DIGITAL INC 003484 SIERRA DIGITAL INC 003804 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000722 SO CALF ASSN CODE ENF.O 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000574 SUPERTONER 004249 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C 004249 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C 004249 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C TAYLOR, MARYLU 003665 TELEGLOBE BUSINESS SOLU 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY TEMEOULA UNITED METHODI TEMEOULA VALLEY POP WAR 003929 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED THURSTON, GWEN 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMSLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G RECWARE SUPPORT:DEC'OO-DEC'01 SALES TAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REC SUPPLIES - TEEN PRGM CERT.PRGM;M.SALAZAR:10/27-28 SEP 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-19-683-3263 FRONT ST PED SEP 2-00-397-5042 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-00-397-5042 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-02-502-8077 MAINT FAC SEP 2-20-817-9929 PD SATELLITE SEP 2-18-528-9980 SANTIAGO RD MISC PRINTER SUPPLIES REPAIR/MAINT GTRFLD STAGE R.R. FREIGHT SALES TAX REFUND: EXCURSION - PADRES AUG LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS YR 2000 COMMISSIONER RECOGN. SALES TAX EMP RECOGNITION AWARD: DAUER REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT JUL REPAIR/SVC TO PW PATCH TRN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT SEP CITY HALL ELEV. SVC/MAINT CLEAN/SEAL OLD TOWN SIDEWALK TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5211 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5320 001-161-999-5261 190-180-999-5319 001-164-603-5319 340-199-701-5240 190-180-999-5319 340-199-702-5240 001-170-999-5229 190-180-999-5319 320-199-999-5221 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-4986 320-199-999-5208 001-100-999-5265 001-100-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 190-2900 190-2900 001-164-601-5214 190-186-999-5262 340-199-701-5250 001-164-603-5250 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 3,435.00 266.21 1,623.20 112.02 120.00 161.31 345.84 6,198.69 110.26 1,299.83 189.74 173.69 96.62 261.00 8.64 20.23 21.00 1,945.29 507.00 39.29 61.63 100.00 105.00 160.00 199.92 214.00 5,000.00 409.60 358.40 102.40 256.00 204.80 292.00 116.80 3,701.21 1,623.20 112.02 120.00 8,479.36 96.62 289.87 21.00 1,945.29 607.92 100.00 105.00 160.00 199.92 214.00 5,000.00 1,740.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 10/05/00 11:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 64973 10/05/00 003722 UNITROL CORPORATION SIREN AMPS FOR PD MOTORCYCLE 001-170-999-5610 406.00 6497'5 10/05/00 003722 UNITEOL CORPORATION FREIGHT 001-170-999-5610 3.42 64973 10/05/00 003722 UNITROL CORPORATION SALES TAX 001-170-999-5610 31.47 64974 10/05/00 004261 VERIZOE CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-1408 PD SATELLITE OFF. 001-170-999-5229 242.15 64974 10/05/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA SEP XXX-3526 FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 82.27 64974 10/05/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA SEP XXX-5857 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 42.84 64974 10/05/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA SEP XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 75.76 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 W~IE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6/*975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64975 10/05/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64976 10/05/00 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN 64977 10/05/00 003607 XPECT FIRST AID TIE-TIE LINERS FOR CRC TIE-TIE LINERS FOR SR CTR TIE-TIE LINERS FOR TCC TIE-TIE LINERS FOR T.V.MUSEUM TIE-TIE LINERS FOR CITY HALL TIE-TIE LINERS FOR M.~INT FAC TIE-TIE LINERS FOR VAR.PARKS SALES TAX TCC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORK FIRST AID SUPPLIES:PW PUBLIC EDUC.MATERIALS:FIRE PRV 440.89 64978 10/05/00 004165 YOUTH'S SAFETY COMPANY 443.02 190-182-999-5212 67.40 190-181-999-5212 67.40 190-184-999-5212 33.70 190-185-999-5212 33.70 340-199-701-5212 33.70 340-199-702-5212 33.70 190-180-999-5212 67.40 190-180-999-5212 26.12 190-184-999-5212 80.62 443.74 001-164-601-5218 808.08 808.08 001-164-601-5218 26.69 26.69 001-171-999-5296 312.16 312.16 TOTAL CHECKS 218,420.91 VOUCHRE2 10/12/00 14:25 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 15 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL O 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES AMOUNT 203,998.00 5,154.80 101,680.14 28,683.49 28,890.18 306.46 1,050.00 987.32 4,169.77 671.91 4,794.63 2,903.27 4~054.11 TOTAL 387,344.08 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT GATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 64979 10/05/00 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS ITE TRAFFIC WKSHP:ODMMISSIONER 001-164-602-5258 225.00 225.00 64980 10/05/00 PIZZA FACTORY REFSHMNTS:MNTC CREW MTG:10/12 001-164-604-5260 111.58 111.58 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 64981 10/09/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 57'3011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 5T3011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 57'3011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573011 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 57~096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 573096 10/12/00 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE=CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE=CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 u S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INBTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX IEDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 000444 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 001-100-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 001-170-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-111-999-5230 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 25.96 121.87 232.84 167.50 1,889.55 .66 240.79 830.02 392.08 2w749.42 1,487.59 14.67 24.32 215.43 25,615.86 559.87 4,914.28 14.30 383.15 118.58 256.91 71.75 1,033.57 241.8/* 526.92 6w248.67 150.98 1~359.71 2.34 90.51 20.37 67.90 28.37 255.66 67.66 145.72 130.90 3.70 85.43 2.18 .79 3.65 6.02 7,096.27 8,392.70 42,174.92 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 573096 10/12/00 000444 IHSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 147.33 57'5096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1,110.28 573096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 4.23 573096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 84.~ 57-5096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 33.99 573096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 64.57 5~096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 15.01 5~5096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 218.63 573096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 51.95 573096 10/12/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 110.85 10/12/00 001985 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO 64984 MEMBERSHIP:DEBBIE UBNOSKE 001-161-999-5226 100.00 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 001-2330 282.30 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 202.90 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 320-2330 27.90 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 HOSP IC 001-2330 17.50 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 ETD 001-2330 614.40 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 ETD 190-2330 112.00 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 ETD 193-2330 9.60 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 ETD 194-2330 3.20 64985 10/12/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 340-2330 9.60 64986 64987 64988 64988 64988 64988 64988 64988 64988 64989 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 64990 001515 A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC WEED ABATEMENT EVES:CITY WIDE 001-161-999-5440 CELLULAR PHONE EVES:POLICE DPT 001-170-999-5208 17,790.35 67.93 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 626.36 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 13.94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 63.42 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 194-2310 1.68 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 4.64 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 330-2310 5.58 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 540-2310 24.15 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC 64991 64991 64991 64991 64992 64992 64992 003706 AMBIENT AVL INC 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. OLD TOWN TEMECULA BILLBOARD 280-199-999-5362 CRC SOUND SYSTEM REPAIRS 190-182-999-5212 TEMP HELP W/E 09/23 ROSA TEMP HELP W/E 09/23 BRUNER TEMP HELP W/E 09/23 WESTRAVER TEMP HELP W/E 09/23 HITCNCOCK 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 POSTAGE METER RENTAL:OCT/DEC POSTAGE METER RESETS SALES TAX 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5239 REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER RENTAL 190-183-4989 64993 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY BEAUDRY, SHAVON 1,751.00 ~50.00 214.08 101.28 468.00 468.00 191.00 25.50 16.39 30.00 9,172.27 100.00 1,335.20 17,790.35 67.93 739.77 1,751.00 750.00 1,251.36 232.89 30.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10/12/00 14:25 VOOCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 64994 10/12/00 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL 64995 10/12/00 003817 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL SMITH 9 MARGARITA RD REPAIRS 001-164-601-5401 PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5311 4,450.00 506.14 4,450.00 506.14 64996 10/12/00 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 64997 10/12/00 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES OCT RESTROOM FAC RENTAL:OLD TW 280-199-999-5234 247.20 826.00 247.20 826.00 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 6/*998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64990 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 64998 10/12/00 003553 65000 10/12/00 65001 10/12/00 65002 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65003 10/12/00 65004 10/12/00 GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA GNA CUFC 000790 CALIF DEPT OF PESTICIDE 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO 003553 LTD 001-2380 1,515.45 003553 LTD 165-2380 37.58 003553 LTD 190-2380 269.70 003553 LTD 192-2380 .61 003553 LTD 193-2380 20.91 003553 LTD 194-2380 5.59 003553 LTD 280-2380 16.65 003553 LTD 300-2380 7,33 003553 LTD 320-2380 65.64 003553 LTD 330-2380 12.08 003553 LTD 340-2380 34.83 003553 STD 001-2500 2,115.27 003553 STD 165-2500 52.46 003553 STD 190-2500 376.44 003553 STD 192-2500 .86 003553 STD 193-2500 29.20 003553 STD 194-2500 7.79 003553 STD 280-2500 23.24 003553 STD 300-2500 10.23 003553 STD 320-2500 91.61 003553 STD 350-2500 16.85 003553 STD 340-2500 48.63 PEST MGMT SEH:KH/MW:11/09/O0 190-180-999-5261 LICENSE FOR KEVIN HARRINGTON 190-180-999-5261 MEMBERSHIP:LORRI ANN AMAVISCA 190-180-999-5226 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE [NS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE [NS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 PROF TELEPHONE SKILLS:I1/15:DV 001-164-604-5261 150.00 30.00 130.00 638.63 13.01 128.71 .33 10.73 2.59 6.49 3.24 26.00 9.75 18.52 79.00 4,758.95 150.00 30.00 130.00 858.00 79.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 65005 10/12/00 002554 CATERERS CAFE 65005 10/12/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFSHMNTS: GIB LUNCH MTG 001-161-999-5260 REFSHMNTS:MTG W/CH & ATTORNEY 001-110-999-5260 22.60 27.23 49.83 65006 10/12/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING: CRC 65006 10/12/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING: SR CENTER 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 50.00 45.00 95.00 65007 10/12/00 004203 CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIO 004203 AR CHILD 190-2140 12.50 12.50 65008 10/12/00 COHEE, MARGIE ADVANCE:ARMA EF:10/22-26/00 001-120-999-5261 200.00 200.00 65009 10/12/00 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS INSTALL BACK-UP DOOR BATTERIES 340-199-701-5215 460.32 460.32 65010 10/12/00 002106 D A FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 82.50 82.50 65011 10/12/00 001393 DATA TICKET INC JUNE/AUG CITATIONS PROCESSING 001-170-999-5250 609.7~ 609.75 65012 10/12/00 003681 DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI ARCHITECTURAL SVCS:MNTC FAC 210-190-158-5802 65013 10/12/00 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK SEP 2000 SPECIAL EVENT INS PRM 300-2180 971.27 399.06 971.27 399.06 65014 10/12/00 003438 DONAHOE, CAROLE REIMB:APA CF 2000:09/16-19/00 001-161-999-5258 246.43 246.43 65015 10/12/00 003754 DOWNTOWN IDEA EXCHANGE 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65016 10/12/00 001380 65017 10/12/00 65018 10/12/00 65018 10/12/00 65019 10/12/00 65020 10/12/00 65020 10/12/00 65020 10/12/00 65020 10/12/00 65021 10/12/00 65022 10/12/00 65022 10/12/00 65022 10/12/00 65022 10/12/00 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVlC ELEMENT K JOURNALS 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIfl 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATER[N 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 003623 EXCEL HARDWARE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE ONE YR SUBSCRIPTION:MEYER~J. 280-199-999-5228 TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 CHU TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 GALLARDO TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 HANSEH TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/22 THURSTON 001-164-604-5118 001-165-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-180-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-120-999-5118 190-186-999-5118 SUBSCRIPTION:INSIDE MICROSOFT 320-199-999-5228 ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:CRC 190-182-999-5212 ELECT SUPPLIEB/REPAIRS:C.HALL 340-199-701-5212 SEP PLAN CHECK SVC:BLDG&SAFETY 001-162-999-5248 EMPLOYEES QTRLY LUNCHEON REFSHMNTS: BROKER MTG 9/26 DELIVERY CHARGE SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 001-111-999-5260 001-111-999-5260 001-111~999-5260 HARDWARE SUPPLIES -PW MNTC 001-164-601-5218 AUG LDSCP SVCS:REIGHBORHOOD PK 190-180-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS:STREETSCAPE 190-180-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS:SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS: CRC 190-182~999-5415 177.00 1,725.60 2,342.49 223.74 86.45 626.92 512.11 177.98 1,497.66 99.00 82.08 37.36 3,641.04 1,511.19 120.00 7.50 9.30 324.82 11,529.00 106.00 25,325.00 1,444.00 177.00 7,192.95 99.00 119.44 3,641.04 1,647.99 324.82 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE 5' 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AHOUNT 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65022 10/12/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEOERAL EXPRESS IRC 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEOERAL EXPRESS IRC 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 65023 10/12/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS AUG LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER 190-181-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS: CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS: TCC 190-184-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS: FIRE STN 84 001-171-999-5212 AUG LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN 6TN STR 001-1~-603-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN STRSCPE 001-164-603-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS: MUSEUM 190-185-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS:SOUTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 AUG LDSCP SVCS:HORTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 EXPRESS I~L~IL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-165-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 210-190-167-5802 361.00 541.00 195.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 13,375.00 8,878.00 19.76 15.81 14.82 12.20 15.81 36.56 16.05 63,674.00 131.01 65024 10/12/00 FEDEX GROUND, INC. PACI(AGE GROUND SVCS:BANNERS 001-111-999-5230 79.03 79.03 65025 10/12/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT: CLARK 65025 10/12/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT: JOSLYN 165-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5250 150,00 150.00 300.00 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65026 10/12/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 65027 10/12/00 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M XX-7824 J.CC~4ERCHERO:CF EXP/MT 001-100-999-5258 XX-7824 J.COMERCHERO:CF EXP/MT XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:CF EXP/MTGS XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:CF EXP/MTGS XX-92~ R.ROSERTS:CF EXP/MTGS XX-2292 G.ROBERTS:FRANKLIN SUP XX-6165 G.YATES:MTG & CF EXPEN XX-6165 G.YATES:MTG & CF EXPEN XX-6165 G.YATES:MTG & CF EXPEN XX-6165 G.YATES:MTG & CF EXPEN XX-6165 G.YATES:MTG & CF EXPEN XX-1405 O.UBNOSKE:PROF MTG XX-0515 THORNHILL:URBAN LND CF XX-0432 A.ELMO:CF HOTEL CHRGES 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5250 001-140-999-5220 001-110-999-5260 001-150-999-5261 001-110-999-5258 001-150-999-5258 001-111-999-5260 001-161-999-5258 001-161-999-5258 001-162-999-5258 FIRST AID CARE FOR EMPLOYEE 001-150-999-5250 1,255.42 14.92 2,470.49 48.00 11.50 94.80 22.00 14.65 278.21 346.39 269.17 66.26 245.65 308.87 121.95 5,446.33 121.95 65028 10/12/00 FLORES, GWYN ADVANCE:ARMA CF:10/22-26/00 001-120-999-5261 200.00 200.00 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FREIGHT 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FREIGHT 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FREIGHT 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SALES TAX 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SALES TAX 65029 10/12/00 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SALES TAX DAY TIMER SUPPLIES-CIP/PW ADMI 001-163-999-5220 DAY TIMER SUPPLIES-CIP/PW ADMI 001-165-999-5220 DAY TIMER SUPPLIES-CIP/PW ADMI 001-164-604-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 267.26 329.87 276.67 7.90 7.90 7.91 21.27 26.26 22.03 967.07 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CNECK CBECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 65030 10/12/00 004291 FRONT LINE SALES INC SAFETY SORBENT: PW MNTC CHEWS 001-164-601-5218 65030 10/12/00 004291 FRONT LINE SALES INC FREIGHT 001-164-601-5218 65030 10/17/00 004291 FRONT LINE SALES INC SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 480.00 103.00 39.60 622.60 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES ' CM 001'100'999'5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -COPY CTR 330-199-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -FINANCE 001-140-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -FINANCE 001-140-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -PLANNING 001-161-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -BLD&SAFE 001-162-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - TCSD 190-180-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - TCC 190-184-999-5301 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - MUSEUM 190-185-999-5220 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -INFO SYS 320-199-999-5221 65031 10/12/00 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES -EC DEV 001-111-999-5220 65032 10/12/00 GOOD TELECOM 65032 10/12/00 GOOD TELECOM REFUND: MULTIPURPOSE RENTAL 190-2900 REFUND: MULTIPURPOSE RENTAL 190-182-4990 127.07 100.57 330.45 226.94 98.96 249.73 122.67 228.78 65.30 116.10 32.40 100.00 262.00 1,698.97 362.00 65033 10/12/00 002936 GREAT EVENTS PUBLISHING 125 WOMEN'S HEALTHY LIFE INFO 001-150-999-5250 65033 10/12/00 002936 GREAT EVENTS PUBLISHING SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-150-999-5250 231.25 23.13 254.38 65034 10/12/00 GUEVARA, TERESA 65034 10/12/00 GUEVARA, TERESA REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 35.00 8.75 43.75 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES -PW MNTC 001-164-601-5218 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS BARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES -SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCC 190-184-999-5212 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - MUSEUM 190-185-999-5212 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES ~ AQUATICS 190-186-999-5301 65035 10/12/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC CREDIT:CHARGE TAX TWICE ON INV 340-199-701-5212 65036 10/12/00 002372 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 65037 10/12/00 003867 HI-TECH ENVIRONMENTAL & ASBESTOS SURVEY ON CITY PROP 165-199-823-5700 65037 10/12/00 003867 HI-TECH ENVIRONMENTAL & ASBESTOS SURVEY ON CITY PROP 165-199-823-5700 138.57 283.10 5.80 4.08 31.42 65.04 3.20- 336.00 495.00 495.00 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 208.05 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHI~L~RK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 187.55 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGH~RK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.87 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK IRE 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 .80 65038 10/12/00 002107 H1GHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.87 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 208.05- 65030 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 187.55 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.87 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGNMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 .80 524.81 336.00 990.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 65038 10/12/00 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.87 416.10 65039 10/12/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP 65039 10/12/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOUR CARE SUP 65039 10/12/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP 65039 10/12/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP 65039 10/12/00 002126 HILLYARD FLOUR CARE SUP FLOUR CLEANING SUPPLIES:CRC (120) 20" GRIT SCREENS:CRC FLR ROLLER COVER FREIGHT SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 767.91 102.40 15.74 30.00 68.67 984.72 65040 10/12/00 000194 65040 10/12/00 000194 65040 10/12/00 000194 65040 10/12/00 000194 65040 10/12/00 000194 65040 10/12/00 000194 65040 10/12/00 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 2,479.39 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 250.00 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 466.41 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 193-2080 30.00 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 194-2080 16.04 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 101.50 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 300-2080 50.00 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC SNOWFLAKE NAME BADGE 190-183-999-5370 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC SNOWFLAKES POSTCARD 190-183-999-5370 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC ENVELOPES 190-183-999-5370 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC CHRISTMAS LIGHTS PAPER 190-183-999-5370 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC SILVERADO 001-101-999-5280 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC ENVELOPES 001-101-999-5280 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC FREIGHT 190-183-999-5370 65041 10/12/00 003857 IDEA ART INC FREIGHT 001-101-999-5280 18.80 14.05 17.50 7.45 19.95 29.80 5.30 4.60 3,393.34 117.45 65042 10/12/00 003319 INLAND ENTERTAINMENT RO ADVERTISING:SUMMER NGTS OLD TW 280-199-999-5362 120.00 120.00 65043 10/12/00 000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLDG OF PUB:BLDG-MECHANICAL-PLUMB*ELEC 001-162-999-5228 65044 10/12/00 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS OCT E-MAIL SUPPORT/MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5211 1,735.69 300.00 1,735.69 300.00 65045 10/12/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 08/20 LEINO 65045 10/12/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 09/17 LEINO 001-120-999-5118 001-120-999-5118 266.50 60.20 326.70 65046 10/12/00 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV 65047 10/12/00 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC 65048 10/12/00 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI 65049 10/12/00 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 65049 10/12/00 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 65049 10/12/00 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 65049 10/12/00 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 65049 10/12/00 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 65049 10/12/00 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 65050 10/12/00 004141 MAINTEX INC AIR:NRPA CF-PHOENIX,AZ:PARKER BUS SVCS FOR DAY CAMP:MULLIGAN SEP SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT TRAFFIC SIGN DATE STICKERS VARIOUS PARK SITES SQ. SIGN H.D. SLEEVES FOR SIGNS RIVETS SALES TAX VARIOUS ROAD SIGNS CITY MALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5258 190-183-999-5340 001-101-999-5285 001-164-601-5244 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-164-601-5244 340-199-701-5212 119.00 267.70 1,116.99 538.75 597.50 397.50 80.00 83.31 399.89 31.79 119.00 267.70 1,116.99 2,096.95 31.79 65051 10/12/00 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-18~-999-5330 770.00 65051 10/12/00 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 112.00 882.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMDER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 65052 10/12/00 003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: MILLS 165-199-813-5804 65053 10/12/00 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL HTL:SCACEO CF:10/Z7-28:SALAZAR 001-161-999-5258 1,540.00 180.40 1,540.00 180.40 65054 10/12/00 002887 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP MAINT FAC LIFT SVC/INSPECTIOM 340-199-702-5250 100.00 100.00 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENT ADV 001-2090 24.16 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 001-2340 3,266.43 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 179.41 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 190-2340 485,32 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 193-2340 16.20 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 194-2340 4.86 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-2340 89.69 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 330-2340 16.20 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 340-2340 71.76 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENT REV 001-2090 24.16- 65055 10/12/00 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 001-2340 24.16 65056 10/12/00 003678 MILLENNIUM III SYSTEMS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 437.98 4,154.03 437.98 65057 10/12/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS: G.WOLNICK 001-111-999-5222 65057 10/12/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS: S.CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5222 65057 10/12/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-111-999-5222 38.25 38.25 5.93 82.43 65058 10/12/00 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI PLUGS FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIP. 190-180-999-5212 65059 10/12/00 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING BLADING DP~4AGED DIRT ROADS 195-180-999-5402 65060 10/12/00 001986 MUSICAL AUDIO ENVIRONM OCT MUSIC BROADCAST:OLD TOWN 001-164-603-5250 65061 10/12/00 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW 001-164-601-5215 65062 10/12/00 003382 O~GRADYw JAMES B. REIMB:ICMA CONF:9/16-20/00 001-110-999-5258 5.39 1,050.00 59.50 64.12 122.88 5.39 1,050.00 59.50 64.12 122.88 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S LABELING TAPE 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S HANDSOAP 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S WINDOW CLEANER 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S CLIPBOARD 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S BINDER CLIPS 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S PENS 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S INKJET CARTRIDGE HP51626A 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S INKJET CARTRIDGE HP51645A 001-170-999-5229 65063 10/12/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S SALES TAX 001-170-999-5229 65064 10/12/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & ~LRINT 190-180-999-5214 65064 10/12/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 6506/, 10/12/00 002105 OLD T~N TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-165-999-5214 65064 10/12/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-604-5214 65065 10/12/00 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN HALLOWEEN SPOOKTAKULER SUPPLIE 190-183-999-5370 40.00 12.00 6.98 9.00 14.76 1.40 50.66 50.66 14.38 193.14 32.22 122.05 82.12 419.20 199.84 429.53 419.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 9 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOLINT CHECK AMOUNT 650~ 10/12/00 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT REFRESHMNTS:BENEFIT FAIR:lO/04 001-150-999-5260 65066 10/12/00 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT DELIVERY CHARGE 001-150-999-5260 65066 10/12/00 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT SALES TAX 001-150-999-5260 147.50 25.00 11.43 183.93 65067 10/12/00 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES 001~171-999-5311 56.36 36.36 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-DEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-170-999~5238 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-DEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 190-180-999-5238 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-DEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 320-199-999-5238 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-DEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-110-999-5238 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-OEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-150-999-5250 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-DEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 330-199-999-5250 65068 10/12/00 001561 PAGENET SEP-DEC PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-164-601-5238 156.03 482.06 3.00 40.69 40.69 40.69 85.43 848.59 65069 10/12/00 004284 PARTNERS IN DESIGN 65069 10/12/00 004284 PARTNERS IN DESIGN BASKETBALL AWARDS-TCSD SPORTS 190-187-999-5313 SALES TAX 190-187-999-5313 271.06 21.00 292.06 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 65070 10/12/00 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PERS HEALTH INSUR. PERS HEALTH INSUR. PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PERS HEALTH INSUR. PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH IRSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH IRSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS ~EALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS iHEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTN IRSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PER$ HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PRE 000245 AETNA 001-2090 1,304.60 PRE 000245 AETNA 165-2090 187.49 PRE 000245 AETNA 190-2090 421.06 PRE 000245 AETNA 280-2090 62.49 PRE 000245 AETNA 330-2090 89.31 PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 1,2~.47 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 376.20 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 230.96 000245 NELTHHET 001-2090 4,893.08 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 1,388.52 000245 HELTNNET 193-2090 90.32 000245 NELTHNET 194-2090 27.10 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 .42 000245 HELTNNET 340-2090 665.29 000245 KAISER 001-2090 1~884.05 000245 MAXI(ARE 001-2090 166.00 000245 PA(CARE 001-2090 3,911.92 000245 PA(CARE 190-2090 745.54 000245 PACCAHE 340-2090 119.19 000245 PC 001-2090 608.00 000245 PEAS (HO 001-2090 3,602.13 000245 PEAS DED 001-2090 2,437.49 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 151.63 000245 UNI 001-2090 1,983.01 000245 AETNA 001-2090 296.86 000245 AETNA 165-2090 160.86 000245 AETNA 190-2090 43.40 000245 AETNA 280-2090 53.62 000245 SLSHIELD 001-2090 62.39 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 103.67 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 113.80 000245 NELTHNET 001-2090 468.03 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 103.18 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 39.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCNER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 65070 65070 65070 65070 65070 65070 65070 65071 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 000245 10/12/00 PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 000245 PACCARE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS REV 000245 UNI 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2122 66.99 292.45 200.33 16.92 265.65 2,371.40- 84.05 154.60 26,612.27 154.60 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65072 65073 65073 65074 65074 65O75 65075 65075 65075 65075 65076 65077 65077 65077 65077 65077 65077 65077 65077 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000580 PNOTO WORKS 000580 PHOTO WORKS 000252 POLYCRAFT INC 000252 POLYCRAFT INC 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMERT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMERT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT 001-170-999-5214 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 001-170-999-5220 190-185-999-5301 001-164-601-5250 001-170-999-5229 001-150-999-5261 001-150-999-5261 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-164-601-5250 001-150-999-5265 001-101-999-5280 190-181-999-5301 190-181-999-5301 001-162-999-5250 190-180-999-5268 SEP FILM/PHOTO DEVELOPMENT:ClP 001-165-999-5250 EEP FILM/PHOTO DEVELOPMRT-TCED 190-180-999-5250 PURCHASE 50 10" CITY SEAL SIGN 001-164-602-5244 SALES TAX 001-164-602-5244 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CRWS 001-164-601-5238 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CAWS 001-164-601-5238 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CAWS 001-164-601-5238 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CAWS 001-164-601-5238 EQUIPMENT RERTAL:PW ~L~INT CAWS 001-164-601-5238 REPLACEMENT WINDOW FOR BACKNOE 001-164-601-5215 SEP 01-99-02003-0 FLT METER SEP 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL BT BEP 01-02-98000-0 BTM ~ SEP 01-02-98010-0 STN ~ 02-79-10100-1 N.W. SPORTS PRK VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS 001-164-601-5250 280-199-807-5801 001-171-999-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 22.58 7.85 35.22 38.75 35.51 5.36 26.41 12.98 45.36 2.00 56.63 43.38 9.35 11.79 15.06 13.98 3.00 43.64 143.35 7.84 1,337.50 103.66 177.79 16.17 15.07 16.17 26.94 569.40 278.67 42.73 9.96 352.03 81.56 7,700.43 124.78 1,047.66 428.85 151.19 1,441.16 252.14 569.40 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 10/12/00 14:25 VCUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 65077 6507/ 6507/ 6507/ 65077 65077 65077 65078 65079 65080 65081 65082 65083 65083 65083 65084 65085 65085 65085 65086 65087 65088 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 65089 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO GALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO GALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO GALIF WATER DIST 003761 RANCHO METALS & SUPPLY 003517 REBEL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 003591 000268 000955 000955 000955 004278 001097 001097 001097 000277 REID, SARAH RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW ITEM DESCRIPTION VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-184-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-165-999-5250 VARIOUS PARKS METAL SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5238 REFUND: EXERCISE - HATHA YOGA 190-183-498E STREET MAINT/VAR. LOCATIONS 001-164-601-5402 SEP 2000 K-RAT PAYMENT 001-2300 ADD~L PATROL SVCS:4TH OF JULY 001-170-999-5370 JUL HIGH VISISILITY (NET) SVCS 001-170-999-5370 AUG HOT SUMMER HIGHTS PATROL 001-170-999-5370 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF 004278 GARNISH ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC SEVERSON & SMITH COMMER 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO GALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO GALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO GALIF EDISON 000537 $O, CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 001-2140 MISC. SUPPLIES-PW MAINT CREW FREIGHT SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 MISC SUPPLIES - TINY TOTS PRGM 190-183-999-5320 REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-O46GR 001-2670 RECREATION CLASS SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5301 SEPT ELECT SVCS:VARIOUS METERS 190-180-999-5240 OCT 2-10-331-1353 STN #84 001-171-999-5240 SEP 2-10-331-1353 STN #84 001-171-999-5240 SEP 2-10-331-2153 TCC 190-184-999-5240 SEP 2-19-683-3255 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 SEP 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 SEP 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 SEP 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 SEPT 2-02-351-5281 CRC/AQUATIC 190-182-999-5240 SEPT 2-02-351-5281 CRC/AQUATIC SEP 2-15-671-5518 PALA RD SEP 2-10'901-7962 YUKON SEP 2-20-966-8714 SANTIAGO VARIOUS ELECTRIC METERS VARIOUS ELECTRIC METERS CREDIT:DISPUTING BILLING CHRGS 190-186-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 193-180-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 267.29 136.52 4,417.18 459.86 55.46 355.95 273.14 21.55 111.19 48.00 5,000.00 750.00 816.00 3,060.00 2,040.00 212.70 270.80 5.41 20.99 333.09 995.00 163.70 1,252.86 1,269.09 1,281.77 1,034.05 363.74 218.71 1,010.60 28.27 3,656.10 2,639.52 126.59 141.42 22.85 13,431.08 28,643.19 104.86- CHECK AHOUNT 15,603.22 21.55 111.19 48.00 5,000.00 750.00 5,916.00 212.70 297.20 333.09 995.00 163.70 55,014.98 VOUCRRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 65090 65090 65090 65090 65091 65092 65093 65093 65093 65094 65094 65094 65094 65094 65094 65094 65095 65095 65095 65095 65095 65095 65095 65095 65095 65096 65097 65097 65098 65099 65100 65101 65102 65103 65103 65103 65103 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000574 SUPERTONER 004060 T R Y ENTERPRISES INC 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT STN #84 PEST CONTROL SVCS WED.CHAPEL PEST CONTROL SVCS MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCS MUSEUM PEST CONTROL SVCS MISC PRINTER SUPPLIES SECURITY SVC-MPSC PARKING LOT RECREATION SUPPLIES - SR CTR MISC RECREATION CLASS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FOR TEEN PROGRAMS 001-171-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-185-999-5250 320-199-999-5221 190-183-999-5370 190-181-999-5301 190-185-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 48.00 32.00 40.00 42.00 225.45 270.00 56.09 110.39 54.33 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 362.00 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 74.25 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.75 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 22.50 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 350-2125 22.50 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 6.75 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMEGULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRISUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 4,811.05 225.00 1,239.00 13.75 197.25 41.25 75.00 477.35 111.25 SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 62.44 RECOGNITION PLAQUE: A.CRAMER RECOGNITION PLAQUE:T.MILLER 00-01 ECONOMIC DEVEL FUNDING VARIOUS PARKS MAINT. SUPPLIES TIRES FOR FIRE VEHICLE REIMB:URBAN LD CF:09/18-19/00 CITY HALL ELEVATOR SVC/MAINT 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000957 TEMECULA VALLEY FILM CO 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-111-999-5264 190-180-999-5212 001-171-999-5610 001-161-999-5258 340-199-701-5250 001-162-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 001-165-999-5220 004269 TEMPEST TECHNOLOGY 000316 THORNHILL, GARY 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES - B&S OFFICE SUPPLIES-LAND DEV. OFFICE SUPPLIES-PW ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES-CIP DIV. 86,67 297.39 29,000.00 26.83 1,628.68 24.95 214.00 153.91 538.51 332.17 462.54 162.00 225.45 270.00 220.81 497.00 7,190.90 62.44 384.06 29,000.00 26.83 1,628.68 24.95 214.00 1,487.13 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PACE 13 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 65104. 10/12/00 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE SAFETY JACKET FOR PW MAINT CRW 001-164-601-5218 121.76 121.76 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 001'2360 147.38 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 3.01 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360 29.71 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 192-2360 .08 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360 2.48 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 194-2360 .59 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360 1.49 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300-2360 .74 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 6.00 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360 2.25 65105 10/12/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 340-2360 4.27 198.00 65106 10/12/00 004001 U C REGENTS BK:PESTS OF LDSCP TREES & SHRU 190-180-999-5228 43.89 43.89 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 9,888.30 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 229.50 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMp) 001065 DEF COMp 190-2080 1,826.09 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 3.75 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (OEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 91.67 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 18.75 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 154.57 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 83.33 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMp 320-2080 1,333.32 65107 10/12/00 001065 U S C M WEST (OEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 190.00 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 001-2160 2,670.78 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (0BRA) 000389 PT RETIE 165-2160 99.66 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 190-2160 975.32 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 193-2160 23.38 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000309 PT RETIE 280-2160 28.48 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 320-2160 39.14 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 330-2160 64.54 65108 10/12/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 340-2160 17.18 65109 10/12/00 002065 UNISOURCE PAPER SUPPLIES FOR COPY CENTER 330-199-999-5220 65109 10/12/00 002065 UNISOURCE PAPER-PARADE & LITES ENTRIES 190-183-999-5370 1,385.03 240.48 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 285.45 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 11.00 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 32.10 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .05 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 1.90 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .35 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 3.80 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 300'2120 1.25 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 9.00 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 4.00 65110 10/12/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .60 13,819.28 3,918.48 1,625.51 349.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 14 10/12/00 14:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 65111 65111 65111 65111 65111 65111 65111 65112 65113 65114 65115 65115 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZOH CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZOH CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZOH CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN WILLIAMS, SUSAN 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT SEP XXX-1289 PRATT 320-199-999-5208 SEP XXX-1408 PD SATELLITE OFF. 001-170-999-5229 SEP XXX-2626 PO SATELLITE OFF. 001-170-999-5229 SEP XXX-2629 HAGGAR 320-199-999-5208 SEP XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 SEP XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 SEP XXX-5759 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 TCC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5212 CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING MAINT. 001-164-601-5402 REIMB:MILEAGE TO ACCESS SEM 001-162-999-5261 AUG BASE CHARGE 5830 COPIER 330-199-999-5217 LEASE OF 5021 COPIER ~ T.C.C 190-184-999-5239 54.85 265.63 271.13 77.96 39.19 131.95 161.86 62.82 217.00 35.76 56.21 67.08 1,002.57 62.82 217.00 35.76 123.29 TOTAL CHECKS 387,344.08 VGUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 10/12/00 15:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 ROA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND AMOUNT 71,009.32 130,000.00 14,936.60 327,864.75 3,192.50 337.04 2,283.60 TOTAL 549,625.81 VOUCHHE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 10/12/00 15:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 65118 65119 65120 65121 65121 65121 65121 65121 65122 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65123 65124 65125 65125 65126 65126 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE 003184 COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSIN 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & BERVI 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERBH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSN 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT 190-180-999-5286 FINAL PMT-RANCHO WEST AGRMNT 165-2030 SEP SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 SEP PRGSS:RC SPRTS PRK PWO0-04 210-190-145-5804 SEP PRGSS RETENTION:PWO0-04 210-2035 SEP PRGS:PAVEMERT MGMT PWO0-14 210-165-655-5804 SEP PRGS:PAVEMENT MGMT PWO0-14 210-165-655-5804 SEP RETENTION:PAVEMENT PWO0-14 210-2035 7/31-8/27/00 DSGN SVC:PAUBA RD 210-165-606-5802 AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2000 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 261-1270 210-165-631-5801 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 210-165-631-5801 300-199-999-5246 001-1270 300-199-999-5246 280-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 JULY 2000 BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-52T5 2000 KAWASAKI MOTORCYCLE:P.D. 001~170-999-5610 SALES TAX 001-170-999-5610 55 GAL DRUMS OF GLAZE-N-SEAL SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 10,002.00 130,000.00 9,781.16 63,710.14 6,371.00- 257,000.06 14,625.00 27,162.51- 23,848.96 3,508.52 40.50 324.00 13,976.34 4,934.60 395.64 504.00 600.00 686.00 819.00 186.00 297.50 180.00 3,192.50 1,434.50 18.00 92.50 779.60 308.10 3,591.56 18.00 337.04 9,654.65 13,248.00 7,716.00 597.99 6,264.00 485.46 CHECK AMOUNT 10,002.00 130,000.00 9,781.16 301,801.69 23,848.96 45,878.55 13,248.00 8,313.99 6,749.46 TOTAL CHECKS 549,623.81 ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECuLA APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~ AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance October 24, 2000 Extension of Contract for Banking Services PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve a four-year extension of the City's contract for banking services with Union Bank of California 2. Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to execute all necessary agreements DISCUSSION: On September 24, 1996 the City Council awarded a professional services contract for banking services to Union Bank of California. This contract was awarded after an extensive request for proposal and interview process. Union Bank is the second largest commercial bank headquartered in California, with $33.7 billion in assets and 264 offices. Union Bank has a very strong Government Services Department that exclusively handles public entities, which ensures that the City's accounts are' serviced by individuals experienced in meeting the needs of governmental entities. City staff has been extremely satisfied with the service and cash management products that Union Bank has provided over the past four years. Staff has devoted a substantial amount of effort during this period to develop an effective working relationship with Union Bank and to implement a variety of cash management systems. These systems include Union Banking Access, which is used daily to download account balance and transaction detail information, to perform inquiries into the status of checks issued by the City, to perform stop payments and to transfer funds between City accounts when required. The City uses a Union Bank system called PC Clear to transmit the direct deposit of payroll and benefit reimbursements to employees. Other systems have been established to receive electronic fund transfers, to generate wire transfers and electronic payments for items such as payroll taxes. Staff is currently working with Union Bank to implement systems for the acceptance of credit cards, and to automate the reconciliation of bank accounts. Based on staff's satisfaction with the services provided by Union Bank, as well as the amount of effort that has been invested over the past several years to implement various banking and cash management systems, staff is recommending an extension of the City's professional services agreement for banking services with Union Bank. If the City was to change banking relationships at this time, considerable time and effort would be required to implement a new set of banking systems. Staff would require any bank selected to have a strong presence servicing other governmental entities, and at this time most of the banks with branches in Temecula do not provide a group of employees that specialize in servicing the needs of government accounts. Staff will undergo a request for qualifications/proposals process prior to the end of the four-year extension period. There will be no change in most of the fees currently charged by Union Bank. The monthly cost of services provided by Union Bank is approximately $1,500. Based on Union Bank's current fee schedule, the monthly increase in cost of services will only be $72 per month (a 4.6% increase). Pricing was fixed during the current four-year contract term, and will again be fixed during the entire four-year term of the contract extension. In accordance with California Government Code, the contract may be terminated with 30 days written notice by either party. Staff has reviewed the recommendation with the City Council Finance Committee, which has given its support to this recommendation. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of this contract extension. The cost of banking services will be offset against the interest earnings credit generated on the City's account balance. Attachment: -Contract for Banking Services September 11, 2000 Shawn D. Nelson Treasurer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula,_CA _925i0. Re. Contract For Banking Services OF'TE A FINANCE DEPAHTI ENT Dear Mr. Nelson: Enclosed is a Contract For Banking Services that can be used to extend our banking relationship for another four (4) years. The bank will guarantee fixed unit pricing for the entire contract period at the standard pricing today. As with the previous contract pehod, the contract may be terminated on thirty (30) days written notice by either party as disclosed in our existing Contract For Deposit of Monies as required by the California Government Code. A copy of your current Contract For Deposit of Monies is included for your reference. This document will not need to be re-executed unless there is a change of the City Treasurer. Please call me with any questions at 800-298-1276. Si_ncerely, _ . _ RandfJ. Ong~rsma Vice President cc. '~T'Tim McDermott Genie Roberts UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. CONTRACT FOR BANKING SERVICES This CONTRACT FOR BANKING SERVICES (HEREINAP ~ ~R "CONTRAC3"), EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2000, BY AND BETWEEN UNION BANK OF CAEFORNIA, N.A. (HEREINAFTER "BANK"), AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA (HEREINAFTER "CITY "), IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53682. WHEREAS, IN THE JUDGEMENT OF THE TREASURER THIS CONTRACT IS TO PUBLIC ADVANTAGE; AND .WHEREAS, CI~Y_ DESIRES.TO SECURE A WIDE RANGE.OF BANKING.SERVICES TO BEPROVIDED BY A SINGLE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION PURSUANT TO A CONTRACT; AND, WHEREAS, BANK SUBMITTED A CONTRACT RENEWAL PROPOSAL WHICH CITY DEEMS TO BE THE MOST COMPLETE AND RESPONSIVE TO CITY'S BANKING SERVICES NEEDS, AND WILL PROVIDE THE CiTY THE ' DESIRED TYPES, AVAILABILITY AND QUALITY OF SERVICES; AND, WHEREAS, BANK REPRESENTS TO CITY THAT IT MEETS THE REQUISITE LEGAL AND OTHER QUALIFICATIONS AND POSSESSES SUFFICIENT FINANCIAL STRENGTH AND CAPACITY TO RENDER THE BANKING SERVICES SOUGHT BY CITY. Now, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF MUTUAL COVENANTS, IT IS AGREED THAT THE BANK WILL SERVICE CITY'S BANKING NEEDS FOR A CONTRACT PERIOD OF FOUR (4) YEARS. BANK WILL GUARANTEE FIXED UNIT PRICING FOR BANKING SERVICES FOR ENTIRE CONTRACT PERIOD. CITY WILL BE THE SOLE SELECTOR OF SERVICES TO BE UTILIZED. ANY MUTUAL AMENDMENTS TO THIS CONTRACT WILL BE AN ADDENDUM TO THiS CONTRACT. THIS CONTRACT MAY BE TERMINATED ON THIRTY (30) DAYS WRIttEN NOTICE BY EITHER PARTY DISCLOSED IN THE CONTRACT FOR DEPOSIT OF MONIES AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. CITY OF TEMECULA SHAWN D. NELSON, TREASURER DATED: UNION Bank OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. /~/t~a~. ~nge[~a, VICE PRESIDENT DATED: UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA ~ SANK FILE hru'MBER AGENT OF SANK FILE NUMBER CONTRACT FOR DEPOSIT OF MONEYS 8~ [-[I~52ONTRACT, relating to the deposit of moneys, is ~ade a.%,of.t~ day of } , between ~ L~. L'e.L~Oa lreasurer t~y of Treasurer"), acting in his or her official capacity as of ("De2.os, itor"), and Union Bank of California, Bank"). as depository a~navin8 a shareho der's equity of ~,~ on ~epr_adser ~ l'he Tre~sm'er propo,s~'~o~, deposit in the Ba~k from time to time moneys in his or her custody in an aggregate amount on deposit at any time not.to 9xc~l:~ total shareholder's equity or. the Bank and said moneys will be deposited subject to Title 5, Division 2, Part hapter 4, Ax'ticle 2 (c~nmencing with Section 53630) of the Government Code of the State of California~ ~e Governm~'n~'C~ requires the Treasurer to enter into a contract setting forth the conditions upon which said moneys are deposited ith the Bank. · In the judgment of the Treasurer, this contract is to the public advantage. l'he parties agree as follows: · This contract cancels and supersedes any previous contracts ween the Treasurer and the Bank relating to the method of lateralization of Depositor's deposits. · This contract, but not deposits then held hereunder, is subject termination by the Treasurer or the Bank at any time upon 30 /s' written notice. Deposits may be withdrawn in accordance h the agreement of the parties and applicable federal and state :utes, rules and regulations. Th. is contract is subject to dification or termination upon enactment of any statute, role, or ulation, state or federal, which, in the opinion of the ministrator of Local Agency Security of the State of Califomia, inconsistent herewith, including any change relative to the 'merit of interest upon moneys so deposited by the Treasurer. on notice to the Treasurer from the Administrator of Local ency Security that the Bank failed to pay assessments, fines or ~alfies assessed by the Administrator, the Treasurer may the classes described in Government Code Section 53651, except subdivisions (m) and (p), having a market value at least 10% in excess of the total amount of deposits secured by those securities, (b) eligible securities of the cla&s described in subdivision (m) of Government Code Section 53651 having a market value at least 50% in excess of the total amount of deposits secured by those securities and (c) eligible securities of the class described in subdivision (p) of Government Code Secdon 53651 having a market value of at least 5% in excess of the total amount of deposits secured by those secufides. If the Administrator of Local Agency Security of the State of California determines that a security is not qualified to secure public deposits, the Bank will substitute other securities to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. 6. Eligible securities are those listed in Government Code Section 53651. hdraw Depositor's deposits from the Bank. Upon notice to the _The.Treasurer hereby_ waives.securiw for~ that portion of_the ' --a.surer from the~Admini~'tfatdr-of Local Agdncy Security. tl~at--~-' ~_7. A .... r ;oral araount on deposit which is insured pursuant to federal law. ,,__. o. the Bank failed to pay fines or penalties assessed by Administrator, the Treasurer may immediately withdraw ~orization for the placement of pooled securities with the Agent he Bank. Interest shall accrue on any moneys so deposited a~ permitted any act of the Congress of the United States or by any ~ale or Hation of any department or agency of the federal government. aterest may legally be paid on the account into which the ~eys are deposited, then all moneys deposited shall bear interest rate agreed upon by the Treasurer and the Bank, but not less ~ 1/2 of 19'o per annum on the average dally balance of such ~eys kept on deposit with the Bank The Bank shall issue to the Treasurer for each deposit a :ipt or other evidence of deposit on a fonu agreed to by ~he k and the Treasurer, stating, when reunited, the interest to be ~, if any, the duration of the deposit, the frequency of interest merits, if any, and tho terms of withdrawal. Each such fonm is eference made a pa_,/of this contract. The l~ank will maintain at all times with the Agent of the k as security for Depositor's deposits (a) eligible securi6es of 8. The Agent of the Bank, which the Treasurer and the Bank hereby authorize to hold the eligible securities posted as collateral under this contract, is the TRUST DEPARTMENT of Union Bank of California, N.A. The Agent of the Bank has filed with the Administrator of Local Agency Security of the State of California an agreement to comply in all respects with all provisions of the Local Agency Deposit Security Law and Local Agency Deposit Security Regulations of the Government Code of the State of California. A copy of the agreement is attached hereto. 9. Authority for placement of securities for safekeeping in accordance with Government Code Section 53659 is hereby granted to the Agent of the Bank. including placement with any Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof, and the following banks or trust companies, other than the Bank: Depository Trust Company, New York, New York Citibank, New York, New York 10. If the Bank fails to pay all of any moneys on deposit of the Depositor which are subject to this contract when ordered to do so in accordance with the terms of withdrawal set forth on the deposit eceipt (which is by reference made a part hereof), the Treasurer Ail immediately notify, in writing, the Administrator of Local ~.gency Security of the State of California. Action of the ~.dministrator in converting the collateral required by paragraph 5 .bore for the benefit of the Depositor is governed by Government ~.ode Section 53665. 11. The Bank may add, substitute or withdraw eligible securities ,eing used aa security for deposits rnade hereunder in accordance vith Government Code Section 53654, provided the requirements ,f paragraph 5 above are met. The Bank shall not interchange lasses of security (as defined in Government Code Section :3632.5) without the prior written approval of the Treasurer. 12. The Bank shall have and hereby reserves the right to collect he interest on the securities except in cases where the securities are iable to sale or are sold or converted in accordance with the rovision of Government Cede Sec:ion 53665. and from the Agent of the Bank. The Depositor will pay (or promptly reimburse the Bank for or otherwise compensate the Bank for) all expenses incurred in transporting all moneys deposited with the Bank to and from the Treasurer's office. The Depositor will pay the Bank (or otherwise compensate the Bank for) the fees and charges stated in the Bank's then-current Schedule of Fees (unless the Bank and the Treasurer otherwise agree) for handling, collecting and paying all checks, drafts and Other exchange or securities according to the Bank's normal practices. 14. This contract, the pa.t-ties hereto, and all deposits governed by this contract shall be subject in all respects to Title 5, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 4, Al'ticle 2 (cornmenci.niz with Section 53630) of the Government Code of the State of C.a_lifornia, and of all other state and federal laws, statutes, rules and ~gulation$ applicable to such deposits, whether now in forne or hereafter enacted or promulgated, all of which are by this reference made a part hereof. 13.The Bank will pay all expenses incurred in transporting ligible securities maintained as collateral for moneys on deposit to Ilq WITNESS WHEREOF, the Treasurer in his or her official capacity has signed this contract in quadruplicate and the Bank has caused sis contract to be executed in like number by its duly anthodzed officer. City of T~ ~ UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. ,ttachment ITEM 4 APPROVAL t"~ h../''''~ CITY ATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~'-'~C' CITY MANAGER ,~. ,~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 24, 2000 Award of Construction Contract for the Pala Road Bridge Soundwall Project - Project No. PW97-15SW PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for Pala Road Bridge Soundwall, Project No. PW97-15SW to R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. for a base amount of $320,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $32,000, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On October 13, 1998 the City Council approved the solicitation for public construction bids for the Pala Road Bridge improvements. The majority of these improvements were completed under the bridge replacement contract. This contract encompasses the imposed noise mitigation measures required by the FHWA Community Noise Impact Assessment performed for the bridge replacement contract. Nine (9) bids were publicly opened on October 5, 2000, and the results for the bid are as follows: 1. RJ Bullard $320,000.00 2. EV Constructors $371,017.00 3. McLaughlin Engineering $394,000.00 4. 4-Con Engineering $411,500.00 5. Denboer Engineering $415,000.00 6. KAS Equipment $423,000.00 7. M Ahmadi $444,083.00 8. Sean Malek Engineering $494,000.00 9. CDM Construction $559,822.00 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found R.J. Bullard to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Staff contacted R.J. Bullard's references included with their bid documents, and verified that they have completed similar projects for Caltrans and the City of San Diego satisfactorily in the past. The specifications allow 45 working days for the completion of this project. Work could begin by mid November 2000. 1 r:~agdrpt~00\1024~pwO 1-00.awd/smc A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Pala Road Bridge Capital Improvement Project, including this portion, is funded with Bureau of Indian Affairs Funds, Capital Project Reserves and Developer Impact Fees. Adequate funds are available for this work in Account No. 210-165-631-5804. ATTACHMENT: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Contract 2 r:~agdrpt~00\1024~w01-00,awdlsmc CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW97-15SW PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL THiS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 24th day of October, 2000,by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: ,8, CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-15SW, PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Constructioq, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-15SW, PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-15SW, PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW97-15SW, PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: THREE HUNDRED TVVENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($320,000.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be CONTRACT CA-2 made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2%ofamountin excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the CONTRACT CA-3 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an CONTRACT CA-4 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. CONTRACT CA-5 23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR: R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. 23111 Antonio Parkway, Suite 225 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 (949) 589-3601 By: Robert J. Bullard, President DATED: CITY OFTEMECULA: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 ITEM 5 CITY ATTORNEY OF FINJ~CE '.~ D IciTyR. MANAGER /~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council ~)~usan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services October 24, 2000 SUBJECT: Pumhase of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Prepared by: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the purchase of 165 licenses of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Suite from MicroAge of Sacramento for the total amount of $32,435.55. DISCUSSION: Microsoft Office is pdmadly utilized by the City for word processing, spreadsheets, databases, and presentations. Microsoft Office 2000 is an upgrade to the existing Office 97 and provides improved information access, systems integration, analysis tools, new office web components and database connectivity. For each license acquired the City may install, use access, display, run, or otherwise interact with one copy of the software, and any pdor version or any component product of the software on a single computer, workstation, terminal, handheld PC, pager, "smart phone" or other digital electronic device. The upgrade has been installed and tested on City computers successfully by Information Systems personnel. The purchase of these licenses for Microsoft Office 2000 will authenticate the use of this software by the City. Microsoft Office 2000 is available on the State of California Multiple Award Schedules (CMAS) under information technology contracts. The competitive quoted price is provided by an authorized CMAS contractor. Under this agreement it is within the City's discretion to take advantage of the pdcing on another governmental entity contract. The contract is made available for use by State of California agencies and any city, county or local governmental agencie empowered to expend public funds. Therefore, this purchase is exempt from competitive bidding requirements. Staff's research has determined that the CMAS pdce is the most competitive and that there ara no local venders on the CMAS suppliers list. Also, it has been determined that the CMAS program is consistent with the City's procurement policies and regulations and that it is used by many Cities as an industry standard. The below information details the purchase of 165 licenses of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Suite from MicroAge of Sacramento: Contractor MicroAge of Sacramento CMAS Contract # 3-96-02-0004C Units/Unit Price Price 165 @ $182.44 $30,102.60 Tax 2,332.95 Total Pdce $32.~435.55 FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were appropriated in the 2000-01 Fiscal Year Budget for the Information Services Internal Services fund. Attachment: MicroAge of Sacramento Quote CMAS Schedule C - Microsoft Select 4.0 Master Agreement (Contract #3-96-02-0004C) {~uoted on October 16, 2000 Company: City 0f Temscute Contact: Gus Papagolos Addrseal: 43200 Business Park Dd~ Address2: City, State, Zip: Tet~ec~la, CA 92589 Phone: Fax: For additional assistance, please co~tact:: John Rohlnson 800-870-3337 x 3420 MFG. PART NO. PRICE LEVEL CATEGORY 269-02410 MVLP-F LICENSE Office Professional 2000 32*Bit Windows Version Upgrade /Prey Verll MSApp GENSERV 165 PRICE $182.44 $30,102.60 Tax Rate SUB TOTAL: TAX: TOTAL: $30,102.60 $2,332.95 $32,435.5s MicroAge of Sacramento 819 Stalker Avenue, Suite 16 Sacramento, CA 95834 http:l/www.microage-ca.com 800-870-3337 DePartment of General Services Procurement Division P.O. Box 942804 Sacramento, CA 94204-0001 State of California MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 MICROAGE OF SACRAMENTO 3-96-02-0004C - Brand-Microsoft Software-Application Service-Software Maintenance Software-Volume License Agreement CONTRACT NUMBER: GSA' TERM: DISTRIBUTION: 3-96-02-0004C 12/29/97 through 12/31/00 STATEWIDE *or other similar schedules as defined by CMAS Unit CMAS Schedule C - Microsoft Select 4.0 Master Agreement 801-04926 This one-page supplement changes the CMAS contract number to reflect an "02" designation. This designation Indicates that the CMAS is based on a Volume License Agreement. This contract is available for use by State of California agencies and any city, county, city and county, district or other local governmental body or corporation empowered to expend public funds. While the State makes this contract available, each local agency should make its own determination whether the CMAS program is consistent with their procurement policies and regulations. CMAS Contractors are required to provide all CMAS and Volume License Agreement terms and conditions with the list(s) of products, services, and prices. These terms and conditions may include guarantees and other important provisions not included on the contract cover page. PLEASE REQUEST FROM CONTRACTOR A COPY OF ALL CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS IF NOT PROVIDED INITIALLY. ~'~~~ Effective Date: 7/26/99 MARY~Sc~bLER. Program Analyst, California Multiple Award Schedule Unit CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Thts agreement shall provide the State, at its discretion, the oght to procure the preduc~ and ser~nces offered by the Contractor as identified in the Contractors California Mulitpia Award Sc~ledule, sub~ect to the aval~abltity of funds, unless eaflrsr terminated by the State ~n accordance NI CMAS terms and conditions (including cover page provisions) am hereby incorpomtad by reference into individual purchase o~ders issued Agency changes to the CMAS terms and conditions which result in Inc~eaoa risk or liability to the State are not acceptable. 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS a. If the tsn'n of this contract extends into fiscal years subsequent to that in which it is approved, such continuation of the contract is subject to the appropriation of funds for such purpose by the Legislature. If funds to effect such continued payment are not appropriated, Contractor agrees to take beck any affected equipment and software furnished under this conbact, terminate any sauces supplied to the State under this contract, and relieve the State of any further obligation therefor. b. State agrees thai If provision a above ia invoked, equipment shall be returned to conbactor in substantially the same condition in which Itwas delivered to the State, subject to normal wear and tear. State further agrees to pay for pecking, crating, transpoi'tation,~¢o~, i;on~ractor's nearest tacility and for reimbursement to the contractor for expenses incur;nd for their assistance in such packing and crating. 2. DRUG.FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION By signing this contract, the Contractor hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug- Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Govemment Cede Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug-ties workplace by taking the following actions; a. Pubtish a statement notitying employees that unlawful manufacture, disthbution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as requ[red by Government Code Section 8355(a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness progrern as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to intern1 employees about all of the following: 1) the dsngere of drug abides in the workplace; 2) the person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-fres workplace; 3) any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and, 4) penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (c), that every employee who works on the proposed 1) will receive a copy of the cornbeny's drug-fres policy statement; and, 2) will agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the contract. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under ~e contract or tatmination of the contract o~ both end the Contractor may be Ineligible for award of any future State contracts If the deparlment determines that any of the following has occurred: (1) the Contractor has made false cedJficetion, 0~' (2) violates the certification by falling to cam/out the requirements as noted above. 3. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CERTIFICATION pedury that no more than one final, unappealable finding of contempt of coult by a Federal cour~ has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two-yesr period because of the Contractor*s failure to comply with an on:idr of the National Labor Reiaitons Board. This provision is required by, and shall be construed in accordance with Public contract Code Section 10296. 4. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The Contractors signature affixed hereon and dated shall constitute a ce~iflcotion under the penalty of perjury under the isws of the State of Calitomia that the contractor has, unless exempted, complied with the nondtschmination program requirements of Govemment Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Administrative Code, Seciton 8103. 5. EX.~911NATION AND AUDIT a. Slate Auditor Audit The contmctJog genes shati be subject to the examination and audit of the Stats Auditor for a period of three (3) years after §nal payment under the contract in accordance with Government Code Section 8546.7. The examination and audit shall be continad to these matters connected with the performance of the contract includiog, but not limited to, the costs of edministedog the contract. b. Dtsabled Veteran Business Enterprise Audit Contractor agrees that the awarding department, or its delegates, will have the dght to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to performance of the contract. Contractor agrees to provide the awarding department, or its delegates, with any relevant information requested and shall permit the awarding department, or its deidgalee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of idtun4ewing employees and lespectiog and copying such books, records, accounts, end other material that may bo relevant to a metier under investigation for the purpose of patsrmining compliance with Military and Veterans Cede, Section 999 et sad. and Title 2, California Code of Regulations, Section 1896.60 et seq. Contractor further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the contract. 6. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE REQUIREMENTS Contracts which Inctude installation, o~ the wording 'Furnish and Install' require at the time cf contract award that suppliers possess a valid California State Contractor's Ucenes. If sub- contractors are used, they must also posses a valid colifomia State Contractor's License. All businesses which construct or alter any buIIcliog, highway, road, parking facility, railroad, excavation, or other structure in California must be licensed by the California State License Board (CSLB) if the total cost (islxx and materials) of the project is $500.00 or mere. Failure to be licensed or to keep the license current and in gorxt standing shall be grounds for contract revocation. ?. SPECIAL CONDITIONS PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS (APPLICABLE TO INSTALLATION ONLY) a. Prior to the commencement of performance, the C~ntract~ must obtain end provide to the State, a payment bond, on Standard Form 807, when the contract Revision 12/20/1999 Page 1 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS involves a public wonV, s expendit~rs 0abor~thstatiafion costa) in excess of $5,000. Suc~ bond shati be In a sum not less than one-half the conlmot p~ice. Forms shall be provided th the Cool,actor. b. In acaordance with the provtai~ns of Ssotion 1773 of the California Labor Code, the Contractor shall, confem't and stipulates to the general prevailing rate of ~agea, inciudthg employer benefits aa defined in Section 1773.1 of the California Labor Code, applicable to the classes of labor to be used for public works such as at the delivery site for the assembly and installatice of the equipment or materials under the contracL Pursuant to Section 1770of the Califomia Labor Code, the Department of industrial Relations has ascertained the general prevailing rate of wages in the county in which the work ia to be done, to be as listed in the Department of Transport;~tion booklet entitled General pravatithg Wage Rates. The booklet is complied monthty and copies of the same are availabte from the Department of Ir~dusthel Relations. Prevailing Wage Unit at (415) 972-8628. The booklet le required to be posted at the job site. c. Th~ Contractor hereby certifies by signlrl~. ?~s 0ontract that: 1) Contractor has met or will comply with the standards of effin~ative compliance with the Non-DisorlminatJo~ Clause Requirements Inc~udad herein. 2) Contractor is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to ha insured against liability for workmen'a compensation or to undedake self.thsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code. and Contractor will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. d. Laws to be Observed 1) Labor Pursuant to Section 1775 of the California Labor Code the Contractor shall, as a penalty to the State or political subdivision on whose behalf the conbact is made or awarded, for[alt not mom than fifty ($50.00) for each calendar day. or portions thereof, for each worker paid by him or subcontractor under him, less than the prevailing wage so stipulated: and in addition. the Contractor further agrees to pay to each workman the difference between the actual amount paid for each calendar daY, or po~ons thereof, and the stipuiatf~d prevailing wage rate for the same. This provision shall not apply to properly Indentured apprentices. Pursuant to SectJons 1810-1815 of the California Labor Cede, inclusive, it is further agreed that the maximum hours a worker la iD be employed ~s limited to eight hours · day and forty hours a week and the Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the State, twenty-five ($25) for each worker employed th the execution of the co~tmct for each calendar day dudng which a workman is required or permitted to labor more than eight hours in any calendar day or more than forty hours In any calendar week. in violation of California Labor Code Sections 1810-1815, Inclusive. 2) Worker's Compensation Insurance The Contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to Its employees in accordance with the provtatons of Labor Code Section 3700. 3) Travel and Subsistence Pa}r'ments Travel and subsistence payments shall be paid to ea~ wooer needed to execute the work. as such t~vel ~ subsistence payments are defined in the applisable callec~ve bargaining agreemonta flied in acoon:lanns with Labor Code Section 1773,8. 4) Apprentices Special afiention is directed to Sections 1777.5, t777.6, and 1777.7 of the California labor Code and ~tte 8, California Administrative Code Section 206 et seq. Each Contraolor and/or subcontractor must. prior to commencement of tha pubtic works contract. conlect the Division of ~prenSceship Standards. 525 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. or one of its branch offices to insure sompliance and complete understanding of the law regarding apprentices and speolfinslh/ the required ratio thereunder. Responsibility for compliance with this section lies with the prima conflactor. 5) payroll The contractor shall keep an accurate payroll record showing the name. social security account, work classification specitic and straight time and overtime hours wor~ed by each employee. A ce~tied copy of the employsa's bayrcll record shall be available for inspection as specified in section 1776 of the California labor Code. DISPUTES a. The ps,tiaa shall deal in good faith and atlempt to resolve potential tilsputea Informally. If the dispute decision regarding the disposition of any dispute initiative, has already rendered such a final decision. Contractur'a written demand shell be fully supported by factual Infonnstion, and if such demand involves a Include with the demand a written etatement signed by an authorized parson indicating that the demand is made in good faith, that the supporting data ara contractor believes the State is liable, if the contractor decision to the Department of General Services, Deputy Di~ectur, Procurement Division. In the event that this contract IF for information technology goods and/or services, the decision may be sapealed to an Executive Committue of State and contractor personnel, In accordance with established procedures. b. Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to or involving thla contract, contractor in accordance with the State's Instructlona shell be c. Any fto~l declelon of the Stuta shall be axpraesly ' identified aa such, shell be In writing, and shell be eignad by the Department Director or designee or Deputy Director, Procurement Division if an appeal was made. If the State fells to render a final decision Revision 17J2Q/1999 Page 2 cf 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTRACTS OVER $5,000) in accordance with the California Government Code, Contract~ performance evaluation will be completed within the guidelines of the State Administrative Manual, Sec~on 1283. The State contracting agency, upon contract complefirm, will complete and forward the cent~ctor evaluation to the Departrnent of General Sen, ices. 10. CONTRACTS IN EXCESS OF $200r000 (APPLIES TO SERVICE CONTRACTS ONLY) Contractor shall give pr~odty consideredon in §fling vacandes in positions funded by this ccotract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code S.~c~on ~11200 (Public Cc~tract Code 10353). '~" ~ * f 11. ASSIGNMENT OF ANTITRUST ACTIONS The following provision of Government Code Section 4552, 4653, and 4554 (Statutes of 1978, Ch. 414) cheil be applicable to the Contractor. In signing this contract, the Contractor agrees that it wilt assign to the purchasthg bcrdy all rights, title, and interest In and to all causes of acflco it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. sec. 15) or under the Cadwright Act [Chapter 2 (commencJng with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), adsing from purchases of gorxis, materials, or services by the Contractor for sale to the purchasing body pursuant to the conVact. Such assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the purchasing body tenders final payment to the Co~tractor. If an awarding body or public purchasing body receives, either through Judgment or settlement, a monetary recovery for a cause of action assigned under this chapter, the assignor shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual legal costs incurred and may, upon demand, recover from the public body any portico of the recovery, including b'ebis damages, attobutable to overcharges that ware paid by the assignor but were not paid by the public body as part of the conlract price, less the expenses incurred in obtaining that portion of the recovery. Upon demand in writing by the assignor, the assignee shall, within one year fTorn such demand, reassign the cause of action assigned u~der this part if the assignor has been or may have been injured by the violation of law for which the cause of action arose and (a) the assignee has not been injured thereby, or (b) the assignee declines to fils a court action for the cause of action. 12. REQUIRED PAYMENTDATE Unless otherwise specified, payment witi be made In accordance with Government Code Sections 927 et eeq,, as apptinabta. Payment shall not be due until the later of: (a) the date of acceptance of goods or performance of services; or (b) receipt of an accurate invoice. 13. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUS E a. Dudng the pedormance of this contract, Conbactor and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully dischminsta, harass or allow harassment, against any employee o~ ap~ioant for employment because of sex, race, color, encasby, 14. 15. rolJgious creed, national o~gin, physical disability (including HiV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and donlal of family care leave. Contracto~ and subcontractors shall insure that the evalpation and tmab'cent of their employees end applicants for employment are flee from such dlschmlnedon and har'assmenL Contractor and subconlractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code, Section 12900 et seq.) and the edplicabis regulations promulgated thereunder (Califomis Code of Regulations, Tifie 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code, Secifon 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are inco(porated into this onntmct by reference and made a part hereof as if set for~ in full. Contractor and its subcontractom shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agraemenL b. This Cenlractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compTmnca provlsicos of this olausa In all subcontracts to perfann work under the contract. VENDOR DATA RECORD Each Contractor doing bus, ness with the State of California must indicate thek residency status along with their vendor identification number. Contractors are required to provide a completed Vendor Data Record, Std. 204 (attached), to the DGS Procurement Division before entering into this ccotmcL DEBARMENT CERTiFICaTION (FEDERALLY FUNDED SERVICE CONTRACTS OVER $10,000) The prospective recipient of Federal assi~lanca ~nds is required to certify (attad'~d), that neither it nor its pr~ncJpais are presently debarred, suspended, pmpnsed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily exoluded from pa~'dcipafion in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. The Contractor is required to complete the attached certification before entering into this contract. 16. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT a. The State may terminate this contract at any time upon one month prior written notice. b. If the Conlractor's GSA Multiple Award Schedure is terminated within the term of the California Multiple Award Schedule, the California schedule shall also be considered to he terminaled on the same data. c. Up(~ termination or other expiration of this contract, each party wilt assist the other party in orderly termination of the c~ntract and the transfer of all assets, tangible and intangible, as may facilitate the orderly, nondisrupted business continuation of each party. d. Pder to the expiration of this contract, this contract may be terminated for the c~vanisnce of both parltss by mutual Revision tZ,20~1999 Page 3 of 16 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS products and/or sswices BEFORE they may be sold under the CMAS contract. 2) New federal contract terms and conditions that constitute · material difference from existing contract terms and conditions are not considered approved until the CMAS Unit issues an amendment thai includes the new terms and conditions. A material change has a potentially significant effect on the delivery, quantity or qual~y of items provided, 1he amount paid to the Contractor or on the cost to the State. 3) For contracts with products requfring Prison Industrf Authority (PLA] approval, the CMA$ Unit BEFORE they may be sold under the CMAS b. Non-Federal GSA Multiple Award Schedules Updates and/or changes to the Non-GSA Muttipta Award Schedule prices and/or catalog axe not considered approved until the CMAS Unit issues an amendment that includes the change and/~.,r, upd~te, New sof~ware products, when added by the authorized resellers, shall be available to the State of Catitornta without the need for an amendment from the CMAS Unit. CONTRACT AMOUNT There is no minimum or maximum dollar amount specified by of Contractor's products or services by the State. PURCHASE ORDER LIMITS Orders for Information Technology products and/or services shall not exceed $500,000 per transaction. Orders for non Information Technology (commodities) products endlor services shell not exceed $100,000 per transaction. NO ADDITIONAL COSTS No additional costa beyond those identified in the agreement shall be inCU~ed by the State for obtaining the products and DELIVERY (ORDERS $250,000 OR LESS) if the Contractor d~es not deliver its products to a site designated by the , State within the delivery time apecl§ed, the State may terminate the right of the Contractor to deliver and may obtain substitute products. CONFIDENTIALITY All financtal, statistical, personal, technical and other data and informatio~ relating to the State's operation which ara designated confidential by ~e State and made ava/labia to the Contrsctor in order to cany out this agreement, or which become available to the Contractor in carrying out. this agreement, shall be protected by the Centrect~ from unauthorized use and disclosure through the observance of applicable to the State. The Identification of all such confidential data and information as well ss the State's procedural requirements for protectiou of such data and informatico from unauthorized use and disclosure shall be provided by the State in writing TO the Conlmctor. If the. methods and procedures employed by the Contractor for the protection of the Contractor's data and Infon"nsflon are deemed by the State to be adequate for the protectJen of the 23. Revision 12~2011999 A report Is requ[rad even when there is no activity. The repo~ must include the agency name, purchase order number, purchase order date, agency billing code. pre-tax total order cost, agency contact name, address and phone number, and total dollars for the quarter. Tax must NOT be included in the quarterly report, even if the agency includes tax on the purchase o~der. 24. TAXES The State of California is exempt from Federal excise taxes and no payment shall be mede for any personal property taxes levied os the Contractor or on any taxes levied on employee wages, The State will only pay for any State or tocal sstss or use taxes on the services rendered or equipment, parts or software supptied to the State pursuant to this contrect. 25. INVOICES AND PAYMENTS The Contractor shall render invoices to the ordedng agency. Invoices for pun~asee and software fees are not due and payable until successful completion of any applicable acceptance tasting, invoices for services are not due and payable, and do not constitute an obligation of the State, until the month following the month for which dnarges accnJe. Software rnaintansnce and license fees, which are considered a subscdption, may be paid In advance if a provision addressing payment in advance is included in the contract or purchase order. 26. .AMENDMENTS This contract may be amended by mutual consent of the parties. An amendment shall not be effective until approved by the Director of General Services, or until a ce~l~flcetion of exemption from such approval has been signed by the contracting agency. No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid uole~a made In writing, and no omi understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the partes hereto. 27. ASSIGNMENT This contm~t shall not be assignable in whole or in part without written consent of the Stale. It Is the potic7 of the State of CalIfornia TO withho~d consent from proposed assignments, subcontracts, or novaflona when such transfer of responsibility would ~flerete to deC, ease ~e State's Contractor shall not be required under the provisions of this paragraph to keep confidential any data or Information which is or pecomss pubtidy available, ia atteady ~tghtfully in the Cool, actors possession, is Independently developed by the Contrector outside the scope of this agreement, or is rightfully obtaioed from third partes. .QUARTERLY REPORTS Contractors are required to submit a detailed report quarterly to the DGS Procurement Division, CMAS Unit, 1500 5th Street, Suite 116, Sacramento, 95814, Attentico: Carol Umfleet (IMS Code C-39). A separate report is required for each coofmct, as differentiated by alpha suffix (if applicable). Suppliers with resellers ara responsible for reporting reseller ordering activity. Any report that does not follow the required format or that excludes information will be deemed incomplete. New schedules fo~ supptiera with existing schedules~ and extensions or renewals of existing schedules, will be approved ONLY if the sups/let has submitted to the CMA~ Unit all quarterly reports due. [Copies of purchase orders are no Ionpar acceptable.] Each quarterly report ia required within two weeks of the end of Marchr Juner. Septamper~ and December of each calendar year. Reports which becorna two months past due wlli result in automatic contract revocation. Pag~ 4 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS likelihood of receiving performance on the contract. The State does not normalty object to the granting of assignments for financial purposes provided that the original Cont~ctor retains all of its responsibilities and obligations under the conlmct, in the event of any aeslgnnmnt herein to which the State has consented, each such assignment shaft contain a prevision that further assignments shall not be made to any third or subsequent party without additional written consent of the State unless othenvlae stipulated in the State selactod flnandng plan. Should the State desire finandng of the assets provided hereunder through GS SMart, the State's flnandal marketplace, the Contractor agrees to assign to a Stets- designated lender its ~ight to receive payment from the State for the assets in exchange for payment by the lender of the cash purchase pdce for the assets. Upon notice to do so ftora the State-designated lender at any time prior to payment by the State for the assets, the Co~tmctor will execute and deliver to the State-designated lender an assignment agreement and any additional documents necessary for the State selected financing plan. The State-designated tander will pay the Contractor according to the ,~,r/ns ~ the Contractor's invoice upon acceptance of the ads,ts by the State. 28. GENERAL INDEMNITY The Contractor agrees to Indemnify. defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all siairns and losses, with the ~xceptico of consequential damages acoruing or resulting to any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work. services, materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract, and from any anc~ all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any parson, tim1 or co~xxation which may be Injured or damaged by the Conbactor in the performance of this contract which are attributable to the n~gligence or intentionally to~dous acts of the Contractor provided that the Contractor is notified in writing within 30 days that the Stale has knowledge of such claims. 29. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordsnce with, and its performance govamed by, the laws of the State of Califomla. 30. CONFLICT OF TERMS The California Multiple Award Schedule terms and' conditions shall prevail If there ts a conflict between the terms and conditions of the Contractor's federal GSA (or other multiple award contract), packaging, Invoices, catalogs, brochures, technical data sheets or other documents. 31. NEWS RELEASES News releases pertaining to this agreement shall not be made without prior wdtten approval of the DGS Procurement Division. 32. CONTRACTS {ORDERS) FUNDED IN WHOLE OR PART SY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT All contracts (including Individual orders), except for State construction projects, which are funded in who~e or In part by the federal gevamrnant may be cenosled with 30 days notice, and are subject to the following: a. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract (order) may have been written before ascertaining the avallabtiify of congressional approprla~on of funds, for the mutual benefit of beth parties, In ¢xder to avoid program and ~scol delays which would occur If the contract (order) were executed after that determination 33. b. This contract (order) Is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made avaitabla to the State by the United States Govemmant for the fiscal year during whic~ the order was generated for the purposes of this program. In addition, this contract (order) is subject to any eeditional restdc~ans, timltotians, or condifions enacted by the Congress or any statute enacted by the Congress which may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this contract (o~er) in any manner. c. It la mutually agreed that If the Congress does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this contract (order) shall be emended to reflect any reduction in funds. d. The department has the option to void the conlmct (order) under the 30-day cancellation cJause or to amend the ccob'act to reflect any reduction of funds. FOLLOW-ON CONTRACTS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES IN FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND EDP ACQUISITION (SAM 34. 35. 5202) No'paraon, firm, or subsidiary thereof who has been awarded a consulting services contract, or a contract which lndudes a consulting component, may be awarded a contract for the prevision of services, delivery of goods or supplies, or any other related a~on which is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate as an end product of the consulting services contract. Therefore, any consultant that contracts with 'a state agency to develop a feasibility study or provide formal recommendations for the acquisition of EDP products or sen, ices la prsciuded from contracting for any work recommended in the feasibillfy study or the format recommendation. COVENANT AGAINST GRATUITIES The Contractor weffanta that no gratuities (in the fon~ of entertafnrnent, gifts, or otherwise) were offered or given by the Co~tracter or any agent or representative of the Contractor, to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing the contract or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determinations concerning the performance of the contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the State shall have the right to terminate the contmcL either in whole or in part. and any loss or damage sustained by the State In procuring on the open market any items which Contractor agreed to supply shall be borne and paid for by the Contractor. The rights and remedies of the State provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under the contracf. CC~NFUCT OF INTEREST a. Current State Employees (Public Contract Code Section 10410): 1}No officer or employee shall engage in any employment, activity or enterprise from which the officer ~' employes receives compensation or has a financial interest and which is sponsored or funded by any Slate agency, unless the employment, activity or enterprise Is required as a condition of regular State employment. 2) No officer or employee shall ~cotract on his or her ow~ behalf as an independent co~tractor with any State agency to provide goods or services. b. Former State Emptoyeas (Public Contract Code Section 10411): 1)For the Iwo-year period from the date he or she left State employment, no fofl~er State officer or employee may enter into a contract in which he or she engaged in any of the eagofietlone, transactions, ptannlng, Revision 12~20/1999 Page 5of16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS arrangements or any pert of the decision-making process relevent to the cor~tmct while employed in any sspecify by any State agency. 2) For the twelve-month period from the date he or she left State employment, no former State officer or employee may enter into a contract with any State agency if he or she was employed by that State agency in a policy.making position in the same general subject area as the proposed contract within the twelve-month period prior to his or her leaving State service. 36. PATENT~ COPYRIGHT~ AND TRADE SECRET PROTECTION a. The Conbactor, at its own expense, shall defend any action brought against the State to the extent that such action is based upon a claim that the equipment or software supplied by the Contractor, or the opera§co of such equip~nent pursuant to a current version of Cont~'actor-supplidd operating software, Infringes a United States patent, or copyright or viblatss a trade escreL The Contractor shall pay those costs and damages finally awarded against the Stats In any such action. Such defense and payment shall be conditi6~l d~ the fol~vieg: 1)That the Contractor shall be notified within a reasonable time in writing by the State of any notice of such claim; and, 2)That the Contractor shall have the able contrbl of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its ssthement or compromise, provided, however, that when principles of government or public isw ara Involved, the Slate shall have the option to participate in such action at It~ own expense. b. Should the machinss or software, or the operaban thereof, become, or in the Contractor's opinion are likely to become, the subiect of a claim of infringement of a United States patent, copyright or a trade ssoret, the State shall permit the Contractor at Its option and expense either to procure for the State the right to continue using the machines or software, or to replace or modify the same so that they become noniofringing and continue to meet bid specificatk:~nsl If neither cf these options can reasonably be taken, o~ if the use of such equipment or software by the Slate shall be prevented by InjuncUon, the Contractor agrees to take back such equipment or software, and refund any sums the State has paid Contractor less any reasonable amount for use or damage and make eve~ reasonable effort to assist the State In procuring substitute equipment or software. If, in the sole opinion of the Stale, the return of such infringing equipment or software makes the retention of other items of equipment or software acquired from the Contractor under this contract impractical, the State shall then have the pption of terrrfinatieg the contract, or applicable portions thereof, w~thout penalty or termination charge. The Contractor agrees to take back such equipment or software and refund any sums the State has paid Contractor less any reasonable amount for use ~damege. c. The Conbacto~ shall have no tiabilify to the Slats under any provisk~n of this Paragraph 36 with respect to any c~aim of patent, copyright, or trade secret infringement which is based upon: 1)The combination or utitizatico of machines furnished hereunder with machines or devices not made or fumtshed by the Contractor. 2}The operation of machines fumlshed by the Contractor under the c~'ttro~ of any operating software other than, or in addition to, the aforementioned c~Jrrent version of Contrsctor-supplied operating software. 3)'n~ modification by the State of the machines · furnished hereunder or of the atorementioned software. 4)The combination or utilization of softwarb furnished hereunder with noncontractm's supplied software. d. 'r~e tomgolng slates the entire liability of the Contractor with respect to Infringement of patents, copyrights and trade secrets. 37. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY a. The equipment" shal~ be under State's exclusive management and control. The State agrees that the Contractor shall not be liable for any damages caused by the Slato's failure to fulfill any State rasponslbltitiss of assuring the proper use, management and supervision of the machines and programs, audit controls, operating methods, and office procedures, and for estabtishlng alt proper chechpoints necoesa,'~ for the State's intended use of the mac~ines. b. Contractor's liability for damages to the State for any cause whatsoever, and regardless of the form of action, whether in coolmct or in to~ shall be limited to the greeter of $200,000 or the purchase price stated herein for the specific mashines that caused the damages or that ara the subject matter of or are directly relatod to the cause of action. The forego~eg limitation of liability shall not apply to the payment of costs and damage awards referred to in Paragraph 36, entitled 'Patent, CopyrighL and Trade Secret PmtactJon", to claims covered by other spedfic provisions celting for liquidated damages or specifying a different limit of liability, or to blalms for injury to persons or damage to property caused by Conb'actor's negligence. This limitation of liability does not apply to the receipt of court costs or attorney's fees that might be awarded by a court in addition to damages after litigation based on this c. Slats's lishllify for damages for any cause whatsoever, and regardless of the form of action whether in contract or in tort, excluding negligence, shall be limited to the greater of $200,000 or the purchase pHco stated herein for the specific machines that caused the damage or that are the subject matter of or ara diracby related to the d. In no event will either the Ccotmctor or the Slate be liable for consequential damages even if notification has been given as to the possibility of such damages. 'equipment-an aE-inbluslve term which refers either to individual machines or to a complete data processing system or subsystem. Including its operating software (if any). 38. FORCE MAJEURE Except for detsults of subcontractors, neither pan*-/ shall he responsible for delays or failures in per~0rmance resulting from able beyond ~e control of the offending parly. Such acts shall inciuda but shell not be timltad to acts of God, tire, ftoed, esr~quake, other natural disasters, nuclear accJdant, s~ke, lockout, Fret, freight embargo, public regulated utility, or governmental statutes or ragulattons superimposed after the fact, If a delay or failure in pertormanne by the Contractor · arises out of a default of its subcontractor, and if such default erised out of causes beyond the confl~ of both the Contractor and subc4~tmctor, and without the fault or negligence of either of them. the C, ontractor shall not be liable ~ damages of such datey or failure, unless the supplies or services to be Revisioh 12/20/1999 Page 6 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS furnished by the subcontractor were obtainable from other sources In sufficient time to permit the Contractor to meet the required pedormance schedule. 39. RISK OF LOSS OR DAMAGE The State shall be relieved from ail risks of Ices or damage to the equipment under this contract prior to delivery and/or installation as defined in the actual purchase order except when such toss or damage is due to fauti or negligence of the State. 40. WARRANTY contract (including eli deecriptlona, spacfi]clttsnl end drawings made · part hereof}, and such goods wE be all defect, In marerisis and workmanship ami to the fumlehed by the Stlte, free from defq~ ]n Ileatgn, The State's approval of dellgnl or specifications of its obligations under thts warranty. b. All warrantioe, including special warranties specified elsewhere herein, shall inure to the State. its the goods or 41. SUBCONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS Any subcontractor that the CMAS supplier chooses to use in fulfilling the rec!uirements of this conbant/order, and which is expected to receive more that ten (10) percent of value of the conbact/order, must also meet all contractual, administrative, and technical requirements of the contract, as app]icabis. 42. FORCED~ CON¥iCT~ AND INDENTURED LABOR Contractor or grantee certifies that no foreign-mede equipment, materiels, or supplies fumisbed to the State pursuant to the contract/agrenmant will be probuced in whole or in par~ by forced labor, cony;ct labor, or indentured labor under penal sancUou. The contractor or grantee agrees to comply with the requirements of Public Contract Code (PCC), Section 6108. Any contractor contracting with the state who knew or should have known that the foreign-mede equipment, materials or supplies f~mlshed to the state were produced in whole or part by forced labor, convict labor, or indentured labor under penal sanction, when entering into a conbact pursuant to the above, may, subject to PC(:;, Section 6108, subdivision (c). have any or all of the following sanctions impceed: 1) The contract under which the prohibited equipment, materials or supplies were provided may be voided at the option of the state agency to which the equipment, mater~als or supplies were provided. 2) The contractor may be assessed a penalty which shall be the greater of one thousand dollars ($1,0~0} or an amount ecluai[ng 20 percent of the value of the equipment, materials or supplies that the state agency demenst~ates were produced In whose or in part by forced labor, convict labor, or indentured labor under penal sanc'don. The contractor may be removed from the bidder's list for a peded not to exceed 360 days. 43. NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT By signing this contract, contractor hereby cortiflas that any quotetion provided for a CMAS order or project is not made in the Interest of, or on behalf of, any undiscioeed person, partnership, company, aseoc~ation, organization, or corpom~eo; that the quotation is genuine and not cotiusive or sham; that the con~ractor has not directly or indirectly indu¢~:l or so[Jolted any other conb'actor to put in a false sham quotation, and has not directty or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any conti'actor or anyone else to put in a sham quotation, or that anyone shall reftain from bidding; that the contractor has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix any overhead, profit, or cost etemanl of the quoted price, of that of any other contractor, or to eecare any advantage against the pubtio body awarding the con.ct or anyone interested In the proposed contract; that all statements In the quotation ara lnJe; and, fudher, that the conbactor has not, directly or indirectly, submitted its quoted pdce or any breakdown thereof, of the contents thereof, or divulged information or data reiatJve thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organizabon, bid depository, or to any member of agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid or quotation. 44..YEAR 2000 WARR~.NTY Agendas issuing or processing a purct~ase order must use this language in iisu of altamaUve language, unless specifically exempted by the Department of Information Tec~hnctngy (DOIT). a. Iofonnafion Technology Products and/or Services The Contractor warrants that its hardware, software, and firmware p~educts and services delivered under this contract shall be able to accurately process date data (iociuding, but not limited to, celcutating, comparing, and/or sequencing) from, into, and between the twentieth end twenty.first centuries, and the years 1999 and 2000 and leap year calculations to the extent that other Information technology used in combination with the information technology being acquired, propedy exobanges date data with it. This warranty is subject to the wan'anty terms and conditions of this contract. Nothing in this warranty shall be construed to limit any dghts or remedies the State may otherwise have under this conti'act with respect to defects other than Year 2000 performance.(5/5/98) b. Non-information Technology Products and/or Sen, ices Ti~ Contractor warrants and represents that the goods or services sold, leased or licensed to the State of Cbilforn[a, its agencies, or Its pctiticel subdivisions, pursuant to this contract/purchase order are 'Year 2000 compliant.' For purposes of this contrast/purchase order, a good or service is Year 2000 compliant if it will continue to functinn fully before; at and after the Year 2000 without intemJption and, if applicable, with full ability to accurately and unambigueosly process, display, compare, calculate, manipulate and othenvlse utilize date information. This warranty and representation supersedes all warranty disclaimers and limitations and all limitations on liability provided by or through Contractor.(5/5/98) 45. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE a. The State may terminate per~oCnaeoe of wor~ under this Contract fo~ Its convehlence in whole or, from time to time, In part if the Depadment Director or designee determines that a tsrmination is in the State's interest. The Depa~neot Director or designee shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Ten~lnation CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS specifying the extent of termlnaUon and the effective date thereof. The parlJee agree that, as to the terminated posen of the contract, the contract shall be deemed to remain in effect until such time as the termination settlement, if any, is concluded and the contract shall not be void. b. After receipt of a Notice of Termination, and except as directed by the Department Director or designee, the Contractor shall Immediately proceed with the following obligations, as applicable, regardless of any delay in determining or adjusting any amounts due under this clause. The Contractor shall: 1 ) Stop work as specified In the Notice of ~'ermlnation. 2) Place no further subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities, except as necessary to complete the continued posen of the contract. 3)Terminats all subcontracts to the extent they relate to the work terminated. 4)Settla all outstanding lisbllibes and termination settlarnent propoeets arising from the termination of subcontracts; the approva or ratificatio~[~'wh~ch will be final for purposes of this dauss. 5}As directed by the Department Director or designee, transfer title and deliver to the State (al fabricated or unfabricated parts, work in process, completed work, supplies, and other matadal produced or acquired for the work terminated, and (b) completed or padially completed plans, drawings, information, and other property that, if the contract had been completed, would be required to be fumishad to the State. 6) Complete performance of the worn not terminated; and 7) Take any acdon that may be necessary or as the State may direct for the protection and preservation of the property related to this contract that Is in the possession of the contractor and in which the State has or may acquire an interest, and to mitigate any potential damages or requests for contract adjustment or termination settlement to the maximum practical extent. c. At the completion of the Contractor's termination efforts. the Contractor may submit to the Department Director or designee a list, indicating quantity and quality of termination inventory not previously disposed of. and request insb'uction for disposition of the residual termination inventory. d. After termination, the Contractor shall submit a §hal termination settlement proposal to the Department Director or designee In the form and with the cerUficaticu presc~ibed by the Depadment Director or designee. The Contractor shall submit the proposal promptly but no later than ninety (90) days trom the effective date of termination, unless extended in writing by the State upon written/equest of the Contractor within the ninety (90) day period. However, if the Department Director o~ designee determines that the facts justify it, a termination settlement proposal may be received and acted on after the expiration of the tiling period or any extension. If the Contractor fails to submit the proposal within the time allowed, the Department Director or designee may determine on the basis of infonrmtion available, an equitable adjustment amount, if any, due the Contrackx because of the termination and shall pay the amount determined. e. The Contractor and the State may agree upon the whole or any part of the amount Io be paid because of the termination. The amount may include a reasonable allowance for pmtit on work done, including a reasonable amount for accounting, legal, ctedcal and other expenses ronconab~y necessary for the preparation of termination eeffiament propoeeis and supporting data; apd storaga, transportation and other costs incurred, reasonably neoessary for the preservation, protection, or disposition of the termination inventory. However, the agreed amount may not exceed the total contract price as reduced by (1) the amount of payments previously made and (2) the contract price of work not terminated. The contract shall be amended, and the Contractor paid the agreed amount. f. If the contractor and the State fail to agree on the whole amount to be paid because of the termination of work, the State shall pay the Conbact~ the amounts determined by the State es follows, but without duplication of any amounts agreed on as set forth above: 1)The conbact price for completed supplies or services accepted by the State (or sold or acquired) not previously paid for, adjusted for any saving of freight and other charges. The total of; a)The costa incurred in the pedormanca of the work terminated, including initial costs and preparatory expanse allocable thereto, but excluding any costs attributable to supplies or services paid or to be paid; and b)Tha cost of settling and paying termination settlement proposals under terminated subcontracts that are pmpady chargeable to the terminated porUon of the contract; and c) Storage, transportation, and other costs incurred. reasonably necessary for the preservation, protection, 'or disposition of the termination inventmy, g. Except for normal spoilage, and except to the extent that the State expressly assumed tha risk of less, the State shall exclude from the amounts payabta to the contractor, the fair value, as determined by the Department Director or designee, of property that is destroyed, test. stolen, or damaged so as to become undeliverable to the State or to a buyer. h. The Contractor shall use generally accepted acuounUng principles and sound business precticas in determining all costs claimed, agreed to, or determined under this clause. Such costs shall be allocable to the terminated contract or portion thereof, allowable under applicable laws, regulations, generally accepted accounting principles and good business judgment and objectively reasonabla. I. The Contracto~ shall have the right of appeal, under the Disputes clause, from any determination made by the Stata~ except that if the Contractor failed to submit the termination asffiemest proposal within the time provided and failed to request a fima extans~on, there is no right of appeal. If the Department Director or designee has made a determination of the amount due, the State shall pay the Conb'actor (1) the amount detarmthed If there is no dght of appeal or if no timely appeal has been taken, or (2) the amount tinally determined on appeal, Following any attempted edmlrdslmtiva resolution with the Departmenl Director or designee, the Coutmctor may proceed in acoonfance with the Disputes olauee of the contract. J. In arriving at the amount due the Contractor under this clauss, there shall be deducted: Revision 12/20/1999 Page 8 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1)AJ] payments to the Cont~ct~ under the termirmted portleo of this contract; 2)Any claim which b~e State has against the Conb~ctor under this or any other co~tract; 3}T~e agra~l price for, or tyro proceeds of sale of, materials, supplies, or other things acquired by the Contractor or sold under the provisions of this c~ause and not recovered by or credited to the State. k. If the termination is pardal, the Contractor may tile a proposal with the Depadment Director or designee for an equ]tsb]e adjustment of the price(s) of the continued portion of l~ contract. The Deparimant Director or designee shall make any equitable adjustment sgresd upon. Any proposal b~ the Contractor for an equitable adjustment under thls clause shall be requested within 30 days from the effe~dve date of termination unless extended In writing by the Depart~nent Director or designee. I. The State may: 1)Under the terms and conditions it prescribes, make partial payments and payments egains[,_~_ts ipcurred by the Contractor for the terminated pertion of the contact, if the State believes that total of these payments will not exceed the amount to which the contractor will be enUtieq. 2) If the total payments exceed the amount finally determined to be due. the contractor shall repay the excess to the State upon demand, together with interest computed at the rate established by the Calif.'hie Treasurer's Pooled Money Investment Fund Rate. Interest shall be computed f~r the period from the date the excess payment is received by the contractor to the date the excess is repaid. Interest anal] not be charged on any excess payment due to a reduction in the Contractor's termination seffiement proposal because of retention or other disposition of termination Invento~ until 10 days after the date of the retention or disposition, or a later date determined by the State because of the circumstances. m. In determining the amount paysble to the Contractor and notwithstanding any other provision, if It appears that the Contractor would have sustained a loss on the entire contract had it been completed, the State shall allow no profit and shall reduce the settlement to reflect the indicated rate of loss. n. Unless Otherwise provided in this contact or by statute, the Contractor shall mathtaln all records and docomanta relating to the terminated portion of this contract for three years after final settlement. This includes all books end other evidence bearing on the Conbactor's costs end expenses under this C.~bact. The Contractor shall make these records and documents avaltable to the State, at the contractor's office, at all reasonable times, without any direct cha~ge. If approved by the State. photographs, microphotographs, or other authentic reproductions may be maintained Instead of odglnal records and documents. 46. STOP WORK a. The State may. at any time, by written slop work order to the Contractor, require the Conbactor to stop all, or any pad, of the work catted for by this conlmct for a period of 90 days after the stop work o~ler is delivered to the Contractor, and for any further period to wflich the pa~ies may agree. The stop work order shall be specifically identified as suc~ and shall Indicate it is issued under this clause. Upo~ receipt of the stop work o~isr, the Contractor shall immediately comply with Its terms and take all reasonable steps to minimize the incu~'ence of costs aticoabts to the work covered by the stop work order during the period of work stoppage. Within a beriod of 90 days after a stop ~ order is delivered to the Contractor, or wib~dn any extension of that period to which the par~es shati have agreed, the Ststa shall either:. 1 ) Cancel the stop work order, or 2) Terminate the work covered by the stop work order as provided for in the termination for default or the termination for convenience clause of this contract. b. If a stop work order issued under this c~ause is canceled or the pednd of the stop work order or any extension thereof expires, the contractor shall resume work. The State shall make an equitable adjustment in the deilvery schedule, the contract price, or both, and the conbact shall be moditied, in wdfing, accordingly, if:. 1)The step work order results in an increase in the time required fo~, or in the Contractor's cost propady allocebla to the performance of any part of this contract; and *2}The Contractor asserts its right to an equitable adjustment within 30 days after the end of the period of work stoppage; provided, that if the State decides the facts justify the action, the State may receive and act upon a proposal submitted at any time before final payment under this contract, c. If a stop work order is not canceled and the work covered by the stop wor~ order is terminated in accordance w~th the prevision enfiUed Termination for the Convenience of the State, the State shall allow reasonable costs rasuiling from the atop work order in ardving at the termination setttemant. d. Jfa stop work order is not canceidd and the work covered by the stop w~k order is terminated for default, the State shall allow, by equitable adjustment or otherwise, reasonable costs resulting from the stop work order. e. An appropriate equitable adjustment may be made in any related contract of the Contractor that provides for adjustment and is affected by any stop work order under this clause. The State shall not be liable to the contractor for loss of profits because of a stop work order issued under this clause. 47. RENTAL AGREEMENTS The State does not agree to; Indemnify a Contractor; Assume responslbtiity for matters beyond its control;. Agree to make payments In advance; Accept any other provision creating a contingent liability against the State; or Agree to obtain insurance to protect the Confractor. The State's responsibility for repairs and lisbillty for damage or loss is restricted to that made necessary by or rssu]fing from the negligent act or omission of the State or its officers, employees, or agents. If the Contractor maintains the equipment, the Contractor must keep the equipment In good working order and make all necessary repairs and adjustments without qualification. The State may torminato or cease paying rent should the Conbector fail to maintain the equipment properly. Personal property taxes are not generally reimbursed when leasing equipment (SAM 8736). 47A. CHILD SUPPORT COMPLIANCE ACT CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Fo~ any contract in excess of $100,000, the contractor ac,knowledges in accordance with PCC Section 7110, that: a. The contmctoi' recognizes ~e Importance of child and family supped Obligations and shall f~lly comply with all applicable state and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcament, including, bet not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment o~dera, as provided in Chapter 8, (commencing with Section 5200) of part 5 of Division g of the Family code; and b. The contractor, to the best of its knowledge is tully complying with the eamings assignment orders of all employees and ia providing the names of all new employees to the New Hire Registry maintained by the California Employment Development Department. 47B. FINANCE AND LEASE If an agency desires to lease through Lease t/Mart, the Contractor agrees to sell to lessor the assets at the same price as they agree to sell to the State. 48. SiTE PREPARATION a. If the equipment to be installed ree~Ji~e~ dicecial environmental considerations, Contractor shall ~rovibe site preparation specifications for equipment within a reesonabla time upon request by the State. The equipment, if installed according to these specifications, shall operate efficiently, fi.om an environmental point of view and propady fi.om a tuonctional point of view. b. The State may prepare a site plan showing the location of each item of equipment and detailing the associated electrical power and environmental control facilities. If requested, the Contractor will review and con, meat on the adequacy of the State's plan, and shall be permitted flee access subject to the secudty requirements for the site for this purpose. Alternatively, the Contractor may prepare the site plan, and will be permitted free access to the site for this purpose. c. The State shall cause the site to be prepared in accordance with the Contractors written minimum site and environmental specifications, unless the Contractor has agreed to be responsible for such site preparation, on or before the Facility Readiness Date specified In the order. d. Any subsequent oltarafi~s or moditicafions to the site which are directly attribetebio to tr~omplafa or erroneous specillcatio~s provided by the Contractor and which involve additional expense shall be made at the expense of the Contractor, to the extant that such costa would not have been Inourred had the complete and/or conect spedficetions been initially provided. e. If any such site alterations aa discussed above cause a delay in the Installation, Paragraph 50, Liquidated Damages, shall apply. f. Unless mutually agreed to otherwise, arrangements for procurement, installation, and maintenance of nonconbactor's communicalJon media (telephone lines, moderns, etc.) necessary for the retools transmission of data em the responsibility of the State. In addition, if requesled by the Co~'actor, the Stbta shall provide one telephone, with appropflate cmJpllng devices for the transmission of date, for the Contracfa~a uae in installatio~ and maintenance of the equipment. Any toll charges resulting from the use of this instrument by the Cootractot in the installation and mainfananee of the equipment will be borne by the Conlractor. 49. INSTALLATION AND DELIVERY DATES a. Equipment (Hardware and Operating Software) 1) Except aa obherwtse provided In Paragraph 49,a. (7), the Co~trector shall Install equipment ready for use on or before the Installation Dates specified in the order. '[1me is the essence of this agreemenL 2) Installation Dates may be c~hanged by mutual consent of the Cootmct~ and the State by amendment; however, consent of the Contractor Is not required if. at least 90 days prior to the Installation Dale, the State defers the thstallallon of any machine, but a new tastallallon Date wgl be established by mutual agresmenL Such unilateral deferment shall not exceed 180 days, except by mutual agreement, 3)'~e State shall provide the Contractor access to the site for the purpose of installing equipment prior to the Installation Date. The Contractor shall specify in writing the time required to install the equipment. 4) Except as otherwise provided in Paragraph 49, a. the Contractor shall determine that the equipment is ready for use. and operates in conformance with the Contractor's published spedfications. The Contractor shall then cortity in writing to the State that the equipment is installed and ready to be turned over to the operational control of the State. The Contractor shall also provide to the State appropdata docomenfallon to support the above certification, at which lime ~e State will accept control of the equipment for the pu~ose of validating its installation and performance. 5) Notwithstanding cerllticatio~ by the Contractor that the equipment has been installed and is ready for use, the equipment shall not be deemed installed within the terms of this Conb-act until such installation is confirmed by the State through testing as prescribed in the order or by performance of other suitable tests mutually agreed to by both parttas as. being adequate for this purpose. If the test is successfully completed, the eduipment shall be deemed installed and ready for use as of the date of the C, ontractor's certification. The Slate shall immediately begin acceptance testing of the equipment in accordance with the provisions contained in the order, and shall notify the Contractor in writing, within five (5) wo~thg days, that the State concurs that the equipment was thstalled. If the equipment falls to successfully complete the test, the Contractor shall be notified Immedlataly of the failure, with written coofi~mation to be provided in not more than live (5) worf(iag days. contr~ of the equipment shall immediately be given to the Contractor. The equipment shall not be deemed to be installed until the Contractor re-certifies such thstallation and the above-desc~bed test is successfully completed. 6) Except aa othe~ae provided in Paragraph 49, a. (7), in the event the Contractor fails to install the equipment by the Installation Date specified in the order, Paragraph 50, Liquidated Damages, shall apply. 7) tf the nature of the equipment is such that the services of the Contractor are not required f~ its installation, and the Contractor so states in writing and the State agrees in whllng that such Cootmctor services ere not necessary, ~e Contractor may ship the equipment to the State site. If the equipment arrives not later than five (5).working days prkx to the Installation Date, the equipment shall be deemed to have been Installed on ~' before the Installation Dale and no liquidated damages shall be paid, irrespective to whether or not the Stale is successtul In installing the equipment Revision 12J20/1999 Page 10of16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS without Contractor assistance. If this procedure is used, the State shall make every reascoable eft'od to install the equipment prior to the Instatiation Date, and shall confirm such instalistico in acourdanca with the procedures set forth in Paragraph ,{,9 (5), without requiring a certtflcatico of Installatico as set for~ in Paragraph 49 (4) by the Contractor. If, however, the State is unable to install the equipment, it shall nof~ the Contractor that Con,actor assistance Is required. The contractor shall then assist in the equipment instaltation and certtflcetion that such installation has been aceomplished. b. Software (other than Operating Software) 1) The Contractor shall provide thuse programming aids, program products, and applications listed In the order, on or before the Delivery Dates spedfled in Ihs order, and shall certify to the State that such software has been delivered and is ready for State use. For purposes of this Paragraph, 'delivered' also means received by the State, if such software is mailed by the Contractor. 2) If, in the opinion of the Contractor' the ,~l~ceg'of the Contractor are required to install the software on the State equipment, 'delivery' of the software, for the puq)cees of this contract, shall be deemed to Include such Installation services. 3) In the event the Contractor tails to daliver the agreed- upon software by the dates specified, Paragraph 50, Liquidated Damages, shall appty. 50. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES a. General The Instalisfion Dates of the equipment and the Delivery Dales for software set forth in the order have been fixed so that the utilization of the equipment and software is ccosistent with the timing scheduiss of the Stata's programs. If any of the units of equlpment, with all required operating software, ate not installed within the times specified in the order, and/or if any of the other software is not dal]vered to the State within the itme limits specified in the order, the delay will Integers with the proper [mptamentaflco of the State's programs, to the loss and damage of the State. From the nature of the case, it would be impracticable and extremely diffic~Jit to fix the actual damages sustained in tim event of any such delay. The State and Contractor, therefore, presume that in the event of any such delay the amount of damage which will be sustained from a detay will be the amounts set forth in the order, and the State and the Contractor agree that in the event of any such delay, the Contractor sbeit pay such amounts as tiquidated damages and not as a penalty. Similarly, a unilateral deferment by the State of equipment instaltabco without appropdata notice or a daisy in readying the facJlity interferes with the Instalietico schedule under which the Contractor is operating, thus resulting in damages to the Contractor. The State and · Contractor presume that In the event of such delay, the amount of damage which will be sustained wtil be the amount sst forth in the order, and they agree that in the event of such a delay, the State will pay soch arnouct ~s liquidated damages and not as a penalty. Amounts due the State as liquidated damages may be deducted by the State from any money peyabta to the Ceeb'actor. The State shall notify the Contractor in writing of any ctaim for liquidated dan'mges pursuant to this paragraph co or before the data State deducts such sums from rncoey payable to the Co~tractor. b. Equipment Installation Delays Caused by the Contractor 1)If the Contractor does eot install the equipment, (designated by the Conbactor's type and model number), and special features inctuped with the equipment (o4' suitable subetitotes acceptable to the State), ready ~ use with all appropriate operating software, all as listed in the order, on or before the Isstaltation Date(s) spec2fied in the order, or In the cass of the equipment delivered to the State in time for State Instaliatio~, the Contractor shall be liable for fixed liquidated damages specified in the order, in lieu of all other damages for such noninsteltation. Liquidated damages shall accrue for each calendar day between the Installatico Date epecJfled in the order and the date the equipment Is ceffi§ed ready for use or 180 calendar days, whichever occurs first. 2) If some, but not ali of the machines are Installed, ready for use, during a period of time when liquidated damages are applicable, and the State uses any such Instalisd machines, liquidated damages shall not accrue against the machines used for any calendar day the machines are so used. 3) If the delay Is more than thirty (30) calendar days, then by written notice to the Contractor, the State may terminate the right of the Contractor to lnstall, and may obtain substitute equipment, in accordance with the provision of Paragraph 56, Rights and Remedies of the State for Default. In this event, the Contractor shall also be liable for liquidated damages, in the amounts specified above until substitute equipment is installed, ready for use, or for 180 days from the installation date, whichever occurs first. c. Other Delivery Delays Caused by the Contractor 1) If the Coritrector. dces not deliver all the programming aids, program products, and applications listed in the order ready for use In substantial accordance with the Co~trector's specJficaticos, on or before the Delivery Dates specified in the order, the Contractor shall be liable for liquidated damages in the ameunta specified in the order, In lieu of all other damages for such nondelivery. Liquidated damages shall accrue for each calendar day between the Delivery Date specified and the actual date of the delivery of such software or for 180 days, whichever ocours first. If the Confractor tails to provide the software listed In the order by the specified Delivery Date, but prey[dss suitable substitution of software acceptable to the State, liquidated damages shall not apply to listed software for which substituted software Is provided. 2) It the State is unable to use the equipment on the installation data because Contractor failed to deliver the so/tware listed in the order by the delivery date specified In the order, and Contractor does not furnish suitable substitute software acceptable to tim State, liquidated damages for equipment nonlnstaliation as apeciF, ed in Paragraph 50, b. (1), shall be paid to the State In lieu of damages for software nondelivery as specifmd In Paragraph 50, c. (1). Such liquidated damages shall apply until the State uses the equipment or until Contractor provides the programming aids or appticetione which wouJd render the equipment usable, whichever occurs first, but not for mere than 180 calendar days. d. InstaUatico or Delivery Delays Caused by the State 1) In Ihs event the equipment cannot be instatied because the State has failed to prepare the facility by the Facility Revision 12/20/1999 Page 11 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Readiness Date specified In Ihe order, the State shati be liable for fixed liquidated damages specified in the order for each day between the Facility Readinees Date specified in the on:lar and the actual readiness date, but not to exceed 180 calendar days, in lieu of all other damages for such delay. 2} In the event a change directed by the State requires a later installation date of certain equipment and the State has failed to notify the Contractor of the delay at least 60 days prior to the edginal Installation Date, the State shall be liable, in lieu of all other damages, for liquidated damages as specified in Paragraph 50, d. (1}, for each day between the original Installation Date and the new Instellatior~ Date, but not to exceed t80 calendar days. 3) The State shall not be liable for liquidated damages under both Paragraph 50, d. (1) and d. (2) above during the same period of time with respect to the same equipment. 51. ACCEPTANCE TESTING FOR EQUIPMENT (inc/uding Operetinf/Software) . a. Acceptance testing Is intended to en~f~' t~t the equipment acquired operates in substantiol accord with the Contmctoi~a technical specifications, is adequate to parform as warranted by the contractor, and evidences a satisfactory level of performance reliability, prior to its acceptance by the State. If the equipment to be installed inctudes operating sof%,,'are as listed in the order, such operating software shall be present for the acceptance test unless substit~e operating software acceptable to the State is provided. Acceptance testing may be required as speoltied in the order for al! newly Installed tachnolngy systems, subsystems, and individual equipment, and machines which are added or field modified (modification of a machine from one model to another) after a successful performance period. b. In accordance with Paragraph 49, a. (4), Installation and Delivery Dates, the contractor shall certify in writing to the State when equipment is installed and ready for use, at which time operational contr~ becomes the responsibility of the State. Acceptance testing (as spadtted in the order) shall commence on the tirst State workday following ce~flcation, and shall end when the equipment has met the standard of performance (perfarmance c~tada) as provided in the order for a period of 30 consscu0ve days. Operation of the equipment to confirm its installation, as providod in Paragraph 49, a. (5), Installation and Delivery Dates, shall be considered to be a part of the acceptance test. c. In the event the equipment dces not mast the standard of performance during the initial 30 consecutive calendar days, the acceptance tests shall continue on a day-to..day basis until the standards of performance are met for 30 consecutive days, d. If the equipment does not meet the standards of performance within ninety (90) consecutive days after the start of the acoeptenca testing, the State shall have the option to request replacement equipment, extend the performance period or terminate the order (or portions thereof) and seek relief &s provided by Paragraph 56, Rights and Remedies of State for Default. The State's option shall remain In effect until such time as the equipment meets the performance chteria, or 180 · consecutive days after the start of the acceptance testing, whichever escurs flrsL If the equipment has not met the standards of performance by 180 days aher installatio*3, the contract shati be canceled or the defacave equipment Revision 12]20/1999 Page 12 of 16 deleted from the contract and the provisions of paragraph 56, Rights and Remedies of State for Default shall apply. e. At the request of the Contractor, the State shal~ make available not only the fatted equipment, but also those machines which must be utilized by the contractor to identify ~ cause of failure and to accomplish the repair. f. Equipment shall not be accepted by the State and no charges associated with such equipment shall be paid by the State until the equipment has satisfactorily completed the acceptance tests. In addition, if required in the order, no charges shall be paid until specified Contractor- supplied software has been accepted by the State. g. Immediately upon successful completion of the acceptance tests, the State shall notify the Contractor in writing of acceptance of the equipment and authedze appropriate payment. The State shall maintain adequate dally records to satisfy the requirements of accaptsnca testing. Increments of time shall be measured in hours and whole minutes. 52. ACCEPTANCE TESTING FOR SOFTWARE (other than Operating Software) a. Acceptance testing may be required as specified in the order for all Contractor-supplied software as specified and listed in the order, including all software Initially installed, improved versions (new releases) of this software, any such software which has been altered (modified) by the Contractor to satisfy State requirements, and any substitute software provided by the Contractor in lieu thereof, unless the order provides otherwise. The purpose of the accapienca test is to ensure that the software operates in substantial accord with the Contractor's technical specifications and meets the State's performance sbecitications. The procedures for the accomplishment of such tests are contained in the order. b. When software has been provided and certified in accordance with Paragraph 49, Installation and Delivery Dates, b. (1), the Stele shall begin acceptance testing on the first State workday following such certification, as sbecirmd in the order. c, If succassfal completion of the acceptance test is not attained within ninety (90) consecutive days after the start of the acceptance testing, the State shall have the option to request substitute software, cancel that portion of the contract which rslates to the unaccepted software, or continue the ecoeptenca tests. The State's option shall remain in effect until such time as the tests are sucoess~ulty performed, or 180 days after ce~tication, whichever occurs ~trst. If the acceptance tests have not been successfully performed prior to the expiration of 180 days, that pertion of the contract which relates to the unaccepted software shall be canceled, unless beth paNties agree to the continuation of the tests or to the delivery of substitute software. If the unaccepted software (or its functional equivalent) is crucial to the accomplishment of the work for which the equipment was acquired, and is so identified in the order, the State shall have the option of farminating the entire contract in acoorpanca with paragraph 56, Rights and Remedies of Stet~ for Default. d. Unless otherwise provided in the order, software shall not be accepted by the Slate and no charges associated with such software shall be paid by the State until the software has satisfactorily completed the acoeplanca tests. e. Imrnedlately upon successful completion of the acceptance testing, the State shall notify the Contractor In writing of tbe acceptance of the software and authmize CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS appropriate paymenL The State shall maintain adequate records to satisfy the requirements of acceptance testing. 53. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY FOR INJURY TO pERSONS 55. OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY a. The Confractor shall be liable for damages arising out of injury to the person and/or damage to the property of the State, employsas of the State, persons designated by the Slate for t~aining, or any other person(s) other than agents or employees of the Contractor, designated by the Stats for any pu~ose, prior to. during, or subsequent to delivery, installation, acceptance, and use of the equipment either at the Contractor's site or at the State's place of business, provided that the injury or damage was caused by the fault or negligence of the Conffactor. b. Contractor shall not be liable for damages arising out of or caused by an alteration or an attachment not made or installed by the Contractor, or for damage to alterations or attachmants that may result from the normal operalJou and maintenance of the Conffactor's equipment. ENGINEERING CHANGES Engineering changes, determined applicable.~ will be controlled and installed by Conbactor o~ equipment covered by this contract. The State may elect to have only mandatory changes, as determined by C~tractor, installed on machines so designated. A written notice of this blectJon must be provided to the Contractor for written confirmation. There shall be no charge for engineering changes made. Any Contractor-iniUated change shall be installed at a time mutually agreeable to the State and the Conf,'actor. Conbactor reserves the right to charge, at its then current time and material rates, for additional service time and materials required due to noninstellatlon of applicable engineering changes after Contractor has made a reasonable effort to secure time to thstaJi such changes. CONNECTION POINTS FOR CENTRAL PROCESSOR 56. EVALUATION EQUIPMENT If requested by the State, the Contractor agrees 1o identify, on all items of equipment supplied under this contract, all approp~ats test points for connecting one of the commercially available hardware monitors designed to measure system activity. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF STATE FOR DEFAULT a. In the event any equipment, software, or service fumished by the Contractor in the pedormance of this contract should fail to conform to the specifications thersfors, the Slate may reject the same, and it shall thereupoa become the duty of the Contractor to reclaim and remove the same todhwlth, without expense to the State, and immediately to replace all such rejected equipment, software, or service with others conforming to such spectfical~cos; provided that should the Contractor fail, neglect or refuse to do so the State shall thereupon have the right to purchase in the open market, in lieu thereof, a corresponding quantity of any such equipment, software, or service and to deduct from any monies due or that may thereafter become due to the Contractor the difference between the price named in this contract and the actual cost thereof to the State. b. In the event the Contractor shall fall to make prompt delivery ss specified of any equipment, software, er service, the same conditions as to the rights of the Stats Io purchase in the open market and to reimbursement sol forth above shalJ apply, except as ofhan~tse provided In Paragraph 38, Force Majeure. c. In the event of the cancellation of this contract either in whole or in pert. by reason of the default or breach thereof by the Contreotor, any loss or damage sustaTned by the State in procuring any equipment, software or service which the Contractor therein agreed to supply shall be tx)me and paid for by the Contractor. d. Tha rights and ramadies of the Stata provided above shall not be exdus]ve and are in addition to any ctber rights and remedies provided by law or under the contract. 57. CONTRACTOR'S POWER AN D AUTHORITY 'Fna Contract' warrants that it has full power and authority to grant the rights herein granted and will hold the State hereunder hamdees from and against any loss, cost, liability, and expense (thduding reasonable attomey fees) arising out of any breach of this warranty. Further, Contractor avers that it will not enter into any arrangement with any third party which might abridge any rights of the State under this contract. 58. TITLE TO EQUIPMENT Unless otharwise specified In the order o~ financing plan, flue to the equipment shall remain in the Contractor and assigns, If any, until such time as the full purchase pdces, applicable taxes and interest charges, if any, are paid to the Contractor. Title t~ each machine will be transferred to the State when its purchase price, taxes, and associated interest charges, If any, are paid. Title to a special feature installed on a machine and for which only a single installation charge was paid shall pass to the Stats at no additional charge, together with titJe to the machine on which it was installed. 59. WAIVER OF BREACH No term or provision of this contract shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be In writing and signed by an Individual authorized to so waive or consent. Any consent by either party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall not constitute a consent to, waiver of, er excuse tof, any other breach or subsequent breach, except as may be expressly provided in the waiver or consent. 60. CONFLICT WITH EXISTING LAW The Contractor and the State agree that if any provision of this conbact ia found to be illegal or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be deemed sbic. ken and the remainder of the ountract shall remain in full force and effect. Either party having knowledge of such term er provision shall promptly inform the other of the presumed non-applicability of such provision. Should the offending prov{sion go to the heart of the conbact, rite contract shall be terminated in a manner commensurate with the interests of both parties, to the maximum extent reasonable. 61. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS NO actJorl, regardJess Of form. arising out of this contact may be brought by either party more than two years after the cause of acfie~ has arisen, or in the case of nonpayment, mare than two years from the date of the last payment, except where either pady (within two years after a cause of action has arisen) provides the other party th writing a notice of a potential cause of action, disclosing alt material facts then known by the notifying party concerning such cause of action, then the not~ng dady may bring an action based on the matter so dlsdosod at any time prior to the expiration of four years from the time the cause of action arose. Definitions (fronl STATE MODEL PURCHASE CONTRACT 2/98) a. Date Processing SYstem {System) The total complement of C~tmctor-furoishod machines, inciuding one or more Revislo~ 12/20/1999 Page 13 of 16 · CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS canb~l prouessors (or instruction proceasom) and operating software, which are acquired to operate as an integrated group. b. Data proueasln Su~a ~em-A complement of ~--~ractor-fumiahed individual machines, Including the necessary conb'olling elements (or the funcUonat equivaisnt) and operating software, if any, whk~ ara acquired to operate as an integrated group, and which ara interconnected entirely by Contractor-suppliad power and/or signal cabtes; e.g., direct access contmtier and drives, a cluster of terminals with their controtier, etc. c. Macbine-A~ individual unit of a data prcoeaslng system or subsystem, separately identified by a type and/or model number, comprised of but not limited to mechantoal, elec~-o-mechenical, and electronic parts, microcnde, and specJal features Installed thereon and including any necessary soft. ara; e.g., central processing unit, memOry moduis, tape unit, card reader, etc. d. EquIpmenI-An ali.inclusive term which refers either to individual machines or to a complete date .processing system or subsystem, ncluding its oper~n~ sol'rare (if any). e. Equipmenl Failure-A malfunction in the equipment, exc~udIng all external factom, which prevents the accomplishment of the equipment's intended function(s). If microcode or operating software, residing in the equipment, is necessary for the proper operation of the equipment, a failure of such m]crocode or operating software which prevents the accomplishment of the e~utpmenrs intended functions shall be deemed to be an equipment failure. f. Operation Use Time-For performance measurement purposes, that time during which equipment is in actual operation by the State. g. Preventive Maintenance--That maintenance, performed on a scheduled basis by the Contractor, which is designed to keep the equipment in proper operating conddio~. h. Remedial Maintenance--That maintenance perforated by the Contractor which results from equipment (including operating software) failure, and which is perfo~-med as required; i.e., on an unscheduled basis. i. Principal period of Maintenanca---Any nine consecutive hours per day (usually between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.) as ssiacted by the Stets, incJuding an. official meal period not to exceed one hour, Monday through Friday, excluding hclldays observed at the installation. J. Period of Maintenance Coverage--The peflod of time, as selected by the Slate, dudng which maintenance ssrvtcas are provided by the Contractor for a fixed monthly charge, as opposed to an houdy charge for servtcss rendered. The Period of Maintenance Coverage consists of the Principal Period of Maintenance and any additional houra of coverage per day, end/or increased coverage for weekends and holidays. k. Maintenance Diagnostic Routines---The diagnostic programs oustonuarily used by the Con.actor to test equipment for proper functioning and reliability. FacJlil¥ Readiness Date--The date apech'ked in the contract by which the State must have the site prepared and available for equipment delivery and Installation. m. Installation Date--The date specified in the conUact by which the Contractor must have the ordered equipment ready (calt~tted) for use by the State. n. Perfonnenca period-.-A berind of time during which the State, by appropriate tests and production rune, evaluates the performance of newty inetaIled equipment and software prior to its acceptance by the State. o. Accaptenca Teats-Those tests performed during the Performanos Period as listed In the purchase order which are intended to determine compliance of equipment and software with Contractors published specifications and to determine the reliability of the edulpment. p. Machine AJtera'~on-Any change to a Contractor-supplied machine which is not mede by the Contractor, and which results in the machine deviating from its physical mechanical, electrical, or electronic (including microcode) design, whether or not additional devices or parts are employed in making such change. q. Affachment-T~e mechanical, electhcal, or ele~b'onJc interconnection to the Contractor-supplied machine or system of equipment manufactured by other than the original equipment manufacturer and which is not connected by the Contractor. r. Software--An all-inclusive term which refers to any computer programs, routines, or subroutines supplied by the Conti'actor, including operating software, programming aids, application programs, and program products. s. Operating Software---Those routines, whether or not identified as program products, that reside in the equipment and are required for the equipment to perform Its intended function(s), and which interface the operator, other Contractor-supplied programs, and user programs to the equipment. t. programming Aids~Contractor-supplled programs and routines executable on the Contractors equipment which assists a programmer in the development of applications including language processors, sorts, communications medulss, data base management systems, and utility routines, (tepe-to-diak routines, disk-to-print routines, eta.). u. Appllcaben Program.--A computer program which is intended to be executed on the Contractor's equipment for the purpose Of performing useful work for the user of the information being processed. Application programs are usually developed or othenvise acquired by the user of the hardware/softwara system, but they may be supplied by the Conti'actor. v. Program Product--Programs, routines, subroutines, and rdiatsd )toms which are proprietary to the Contractor and which are licensed to the State for its use, ususlly on the basis of separately stated charges and appropriate contractual provisions. w. Software Fallure---A malfunction In the Confractor- supplied software, other than ogeraflng software, which prevents the accomplishment of work, even though the equipment (lndiuding Its operating software} may still be capable of operating properly. For operating software failure, see defiNtlon of equipment failure. x. Information Technology Servicas.--Ara defined as services performed direc~y co or pertalding to eiac~onic date processing and teis~ommunlcations hardware, firmware, and software including, but not limited to, computeriaed and auxiliary automatod information Revision 12f20/1999 Page 14 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS handling, system design and analysis, data converto, compuler programming, InfomtaCon storage and retrieval, voice, video, data communications, requisite system Contras, simula~on, maintenance and repair, softv~re licensing, and b"alning. .Nso Included are se~ces of an advisoo' nature requiring a recen~mended course of action o," persor, al expertise as it per~lns to an Inf~malfl3n technology p~3ject, and Information technology supporl func~o~. ~?. (,'. f Revision 12/20/1999 Page 15 of 16 CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Attachment for Personal Services (applicable when CMAS contract allows Personal Services) 1. Toe State may terminate this agreement end be relieved of the payment of any consideretJon to Contractor should Contractor tail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination the State may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by the State. The cost to the State shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balance, if any, shall be paid the Contractor upon demand. 2. Time is of the essence in this agreemenL 3. PERSONNEL a. Contractor pemonnel shall perform their duUee ee the premises of the State, during the State's regular work days and normal work hours, excep~ as may be specifically agreed to othenvise by the State. b. The State reserves the dght to dlsappreve the continuing assignment of Contract~ bersonnel provided to the State under this AgreemenL if the State exercises this right, and the Contracto~ cannot immediately replace t~di~ap~roved personnel, the State agrees to an equitable adjusf~ent In schedule or other terms that may be affected thereby. c. The Contractor will make every effa't consistent with sound business practices to honor the specific requests of the State with regard to assignment of Its employees; however. subject to Paragraph 3b above, the Conbactor reserves the sole right to determthe the assignment of its employees. If a Contractor employee is unable to perform due to illness, resignation, or other factors beyond the contractor's control, the Contractor will make every reasonable effort to provide suitable substitute personnel. d. th recognition of the tact that Contractor personnel providing services under this Agreement may perfon'n similar services from time to time for others, this Agreement sharl not prevent Contractor from performing suc~ similar services or restrict Contractor from using the personnel provided to the State under this Agreement, providing that such use does not conflict with the performance of services under this Agreement. 4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STATE The State shati provide normal office working facilities and equipment necessary for Contractor berforrnance under this Agreement. Any spatial requirements (e.g., reprographic services, computer time, keydata enby, etc.) must be identified. 5. RIGHTS IN DATA a. All technical communications and records originated or prepared by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement including papers, reports, charts, computer programs, and other dooumantabon, but not Including Contractoi~e administrative oummunlcetions and records relating to this Agreement shall be delivered to and shell become the exclusive pmberty of the State and may be copyrighted by the State. b. Tbe Ideas, concopta, know-how, or techniques relating to data processing, developed during the course of this Agreement by the Contractor or Joindy by the Contractor and Em Stats can be used by either party in any way it may deem appropriate. c. NI inventions, discoveries or improvements of the computer programs developed pursuant to this Agreement shall be the property of the State. The State agrees to grant a nonexcJusive royalty-free license for any such invention. discovery, or improvement to the Contractor or any other such pamon and further agrees that the Contractor or any other such person may subllcense additional persons on the same royalty-free basis. d. This Agreement shall not precJude the Contractor from developing materials outside thls Agreement which are compati~ve, irrespeclive of their similarity to materials which might be delivered to the State pursuant to this Agreement. REPORTING~ INVOICING~ AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICE In the aggregate, Invoices reflecting progress payments will not exceed 90 percent of the ceiling amount of the agreement, with the balance to be invoiced upon satistactory cornp~etion of the AgreemanL In accordance with PCC Section 12112: if a conbact has progress payments, then a performance bond is required by law. The bond is issued to the name of the contracting agency...j.[ the agency is issuing the contraol under delegated authority or CMAS they hold the bond, otherwise DGS holds the bond. The amount of the bond is 50% of the total amount of the contract. LIABILITIES FOR DAMAGES a. The Contractor shall be relieved trom liability with respect to the performance of work as outlined in each order when the State agrees the tasks have been satisfactorily completed. b. Except for liability for injury to parsons or damage to property, the Contraolor will be liable for damages only to the extent of the maximum amount of this Agreement. c. In no evenl will the conbactor or the state pa liable for consequential damages even If notification has been given as to the possibility of such damages. d. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing oontained herein shall limit contractor's liability for personal injury and damage to property caused by contracto,~s negligence or tortuous act. e. Neither party ta this Agreement shall be liable for damages resulting from delayed or defective performance when sucfl delays arise out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the offending party. Such causes may include, but are not restricted to, Acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of the State In its sovereign capacity, fires, fiends, power failure, disabling strikes, epidemics, Quarantine res~ol[ons, and freight emba~gces. Revision 12/20/1999 Page 16 of 16 ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY A'i-I'ORN EY DIRECTOR OF FINANC/~_ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Peter Thorson, City Attorney October 24, 2000 Adoption of Resolution Denying Planning Application No. 99-0317, Temecula Ridge Apartments (located on the south side of Rancho California Road, southeast of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road - approximately 20.88 net acres) RECOMMENDED: That the Council adopt Resolution No. 2000-__ entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0317 AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0317, WHICH CONSISTS OF AN APPLICATION FOR A 246-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-01'1) BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2000, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Planning Application No. 99-0317, Temecula Ridge Apartments. At the conclusion of the public hearing the Council voted 4-1, with Mayor Stone dissenting, to instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution denying the project and upholding the appeal of Council Member Naggar with appropriate findings. The City Attorney has prepared the apprepriate resolution for denial. Under State law the Council must prepare written findings justifying its denial of a land use project. The Resolution contains the findings required by law and explains the Council's reasons for denying the project. The recommended action is to approve the Resolution denying the Temecula Ridge Apartment Project. Due to the legal requirements for written findings, the Council Membere in support of denial must vote "yes" on the recommended action to deny the Project and "no" to support the Project. RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0317 AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0317, WHICH CONSISTS OF AN APPLICATION FOR A 246 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS F O L LOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. AGK Group LLC filed Planning Application No. 99-0317, Development Plan, for the development and operation of the Temecula Ridge Apartment Project consisting of 246 units in a two and three story apartment complex with pool, clubhouse workout building, and tot lot (hereafter the "Project") on a 20.88 acre site located on the south side of Rancho California Road southeast of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road, Assessor's Parcel No. 944-290-011 (hereafter the "Site"). B. The Project has been processed in accordance with State law and the provisions of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code. C. The Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on the Project on May 3, 2000, June 7, 2000, July 5, 2000, and August 16, 2000 at which time the Applicant, its representatives and members of the public had the opportunity to address the Planning Commission on the Project. D. At the conclusion of the public hearing on August 16, 2000, the Planning Commission duly considered the material in the administrative record before it and the testimony received at the public hearings and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 00- 031 approving the Project. E. Thereafter, on August 24, 2000, Temecula Council Member Michael Naggar duly filed a Notice of Appeal with the City Clerk pursuant to Section 17.03.090 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Section 17.03.090 specifically authorizes members of the City Council to file appeals from Planning Commission actions and Council Member Naggar's appeal complied in all respects with the requirements of Section 17.03.090. F. On October 10, 2000 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Applicant, its representatives and members of the public had the opportunity to address the Council on the Project. The hearing lasted into the early morning hours of October 11, 2000. Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council duly considered the administrative record before it and the testimony received at the public hearing. The City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution denying R:/Resos2000- 1 the Project and upholding the appeal of Council Member Naggar by a vote of 4-1, with Mayor Stone dissenting. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby further find, determine and declare that: A. The proposed Project is not in conformance with General Plan for the City of Temecula and specifically the Project is not in conformance with the density requirements of the Land Use Element of the General Plan because of the following: (1) The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the Site of the Project as "Medium Density" which according to Table 2-2 of the Land Use Elements allows a range of 7 to 12 dwelling units per acre. (2) Section IV.A.1. of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, provides that the "[d]etermination of precise density, development location, and lot coverage on any residential property is a function of: · Opportunities and constraints presented by natural, cultural or scenic features; Policies and implementation programs of the General Plan intended to maximize public safety; achieve high quality site planning and design; provide sufficient levels of public service; retain significant natural resources; ensure compatibility between uses; and encourage development of Village Centers. Building and development standards contained in the Development Code, public works standards, and other regulations and ordinances." (3) Policy 5.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan states: "Include in the Development Code [Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code] and through other ordinances a package of incentives to encourage development to include: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 10. 11. Additional active parkland Development of parkland and trails Preservation of historic buildings or sites Additional open space Preservation and enhancement of natural habitat Additional public or community facilities Additional or improved public spaces or plazas for community use. Additional amenities in multifamily developments Transit facilities and/or additional right of way along future transit corridors. Housing that meets the needs of very iow and Iow income households. Provisional of cultural facilities." R:/Resos2000- 2 (4) Since 1993, Section IV.A.1. of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and Policy 5.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as described in subsections (2) and (3) have been the "rules" which the Temecula Planning Department, the Planning Commission and City Council have applied to determined the appropriate densities within the designated ranges for residential projects. These sections were adopted as part of the General Plan of the City of Temecula by Resolution No. 93-92 approved by the City Council on November 9, 1993. (5) On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the "Growth Management Program Action Plan" pursuant to the authority of Section ll.B. of the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element of the Temecula General Plan. (a) The first paragraph of the Growth Management Program Action Plan provides: "This Action Plan is intended to serve as the City Council's policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures for the City of Temecula. Each development project shall be studied by Staff, the Planning Commission and City Council in light of the concerns expressed in this Plan, and its action programs. Each project shall be considered on its own merit and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws and under the City's General Plan and zoning ordinances." Plan provides: (b) Section 2.B.1. of the Growth Management Program Action "Direct the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in each density category. The Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides onsite or community amenities." (c) The Growth Management Program Action Plan is applicable to the Project because at the time of the adoption of the Growth Management Program Action Plan, and through the present, no permits of any nature have been issued for the Project and, therefore, no vested right to proceed with the Project have been established. The fact that the application for the Project was "deemed complete" by the Planning Department Staff means only that the documents necessary to enable the Staff, Planning Commission and City Council to review the Project had been received by the City and does not establish any vested rights to proceed with the Project. (6) A specific density within the 7 to 12 dwelling units per acre range of the Medium land use designation has not previously been established for the Site by the City; (7) Based upon the factors set forth in the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Growth Management Program Action Plan, the proposed density of the Project is too high and should be established at the lowest density of the Medium land use designation density range because: R:/Resos2000- 3 (a) The Project does not have amenities sufficient to support the highest density for the Project. The Project has many features, which make it an attractive multi-family project, but few features beyond those required by the Development Code, support its commercial viability or required to adapt the Project to the special conditions of the Site. (b) The increased landscaping is not an amenity sufficient to support the highest density on this Site because the landscaping is both required by Chapter 17.03 of the Temecula Municipal Code and is to adapt the Project to the hilly topography of the Site. (c) The 25-meter pool is not an onsite or community amenity sufficient to support establishing the Project density at the highest level because its use is limited to Project residents with some use by local swim teams. While providing some theoretical benefits to the swim teams which may use the pool, the actual benefits are minimal due to the inherent conflict between residential apartment residents and swim teams practicing between 4:30 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. each morning. (d) Placing the garages under the apartment units is not an onsite or community amenity sufficient to support establishing the Project density for this Site at the highest level because such garages are part of good planning for the Project and would have been required as part of the architectural review of the Project. The garage under the apartment units creates a three-story building which obscures the natural ridgeline and terrain of the Site and creates buildings of such height and bulk as to be incompatible with the natural terrain of the Site. The high density makes it impossible to retain the natural terrain of the Project Site. (e) The clubhouse, workout facility, spa, sun deck, arbor, outdoor fireplace, barbeque, tot lot, car wash area, corner monumentations, enhanced entries, bus turnout, and greenbelt are all features of the Project which are necessary to mitigate direct impacts of the Project or to comply with requirements of the design review under Chapter 17.03. These features are typically found in similar projects, but do not qualify as amenities that warrant increased density. Therefore, these features of the Project are not onsite or community amenities sufficient to support establishing the Project density at the highest level. (f) The improvements to the Moraga Drive and Rancho California Road intersection which are in excess of those needed to mitigate traffic generated on the Site are the type of amenities contemplated by the General Plan Land Use Element and the Growth Management Plan for the establishment of an appropriate density for the Project. The benefit of the additional improvement to the Moraga/Rancho California Road intersection, however, is not sufficient to support the high density of the proposed Project. (g) The Project does not provided the contributions to the community which Sections IV.A. 1. and Policy 5.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan require in order to establish Project density at the highest end of the density range. The Project does not provide added parkland beyond the requirements of the Temecula Municipal Code. The Project does not provide shuttle or other transportation services for residents to other locations within the City. The Project does not provide any measures for habitat conservation other than minimum compliance with the requirements of state and federal law. The Project does not provide for any cultural facilities for the public. The Project does not provide for the payment of any fees for public parks, spaces, trails, plazas, transit facilities, transit systems, or cultural facilities beyond that required for all Projects by the City's Development Impact Fee. R:/Resos2000- 4 B. The proposed Project does not protect the public health, safety and general welfare as required by Section 17.05.010.F. because of the following problems: (1) Extensive grading of the Site will be required to support the proposed Project highest density. Nearly 200,000 cubic yards of soil will need to be moved to create the cut and fill slopes, with remedial measures such as buttresses and stabilization fills required for such grading. (2) The intersections of Rancho California Road at the 1-15 Southbound Ramps, at the 1-15 Northbound Ramps and at Ynez Road are operating at level of service D. The traffic generated by the high density of the proposed Project will contribute to the continuation of level of service D at these locations. The traffic analysis does not adequately take into account the traffic expected to be generated on Rancho California Road by projects being developed in the unincorporated areas of Riverside County east of the City of Temecula, which will utilize Rancho California Road. Too many new cars are being added to the community to justify establishing the Project density at the highest level. (3) Noise levels at the exterior of the apartments closest to Rancho California Road will exceed 60.7 CNEL at the first floor units and 64.9 CNEL at the second floor units, which readings do not take into account the increase in traffic expected along Rancho California Road due to the extensive development of residential units in the unincorporated areas of the County to the east of the City of Temecula. These levels exceed acceptable interior noise levels for residential units. The mitigation measures proposed to meet these noise standards consist of sound insulation and solid exterior walls facing Rancho California Road with no windows or window which do not open. These mitigation measures are not acceptable as they create more problems with aesthetics, ventilation, and quality living spaces than they solve. Without the high density of the Project other less drastic mitigation measures could be used to mitigate the noise impacts. (4) The proposed density of the Project creates a large school age population. The transportation alternatives and available walking routes for the number of children likely to reside in the apartments at the proposed density is inadequate. Bussing by the Temecula Valley Unified School District is not available. Children will be forced to walk along busy traffic routes and through heavily traveled residential areas. Bus and shuttle service for the residents is not being provided by the owner of the Project. (5) The Project is inconsistent with Policy 3.2 of the Community Design Element of the City's General Plan. A sufficient buffer does not exist between the high- density multifamily residential units proposed for the Project Site and the single-family residential neighborhoods southerly and easterly of the Project Site. (6) The proposed density of the Project and the height and bulk of the buildings obscures an important natural ridgeline and natural features of the Project Site. The nearly 200,000 cubic yards of grading will destroy the natural ddgeline and features of the Project Site without adequate mitigation of the destruction of these natural resources. Section 3. Based on the findings set forth in Section 1., above, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby upholds the August 24, 2000 appeal of Council Member Naggar of Planning Application No. 99-0317 and denies Planning Application No. 99-0317. R:/Resos2000- 5 Section 4. Pursuant to the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, the Applicant is hereby notified that any legal action to challenge the validity of the action taken by this Resolution must be filed not later than the ninetieth day following the date a copy of this Resolution is mailed to the Applicant , or any extension of such time as may be allowed by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a true, correct and complete copy of this Resolution, along with a certificate of mailing, to the Applicant, first-class postage prepaid, at the address of the Applicant as set forth in Planning Application No. 99- 0317 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 24th day of October, 2000. Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2000- 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 24th day of October, 2000, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2000- 7 ITEM 7 ORDINANCE NO. 2000-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00- 0261 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 5), TO AMEND THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN'S DESIGN GUIDELINES, FOR VILLAGE "B", RELATED TO THE SIZE AND VARIATION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS TO BE BUILT IN PLANNING AREAS 8 AND 10/11/12, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD OFF OF PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY SOUTH OF PARDUCCI LANE AND NORTH OF RUE JADOT CONSISTING OF ALL LOTS IN TRACT NO'S. 23100-6, -7, AND -8. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. following findings: Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Margarita Village Specific Plan because the amendment maintains a variety of home sizes and styles. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Margarita Village Specific Plan because the amendment permits the development of homes of desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not affect the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the changes relate to the Design Guidelines and do not alter any element of the Specific Plan affecting these concerns. Section 2. Chapter III - Design Guidelines, Section C.3. - Village "B" Architectural Guidelines, for the Margarita Village Specific Plan are hereby amended: A. Subsection b. Building Mass, Form, and Scale, the first paragraph is hereby amended to read as follows: "Home sizes are depicted below. If changes to the home sizes are desired they may be administratively approved by the Director of Planning without amending this Specific Plan." B. First bullet changed to delete Planning Areas 8 & 10/11/12. "The homes in Planning Areas 2 and 3, 2, '~,-.d !0/! !/!2 shall range in size from 1,500 sq. ft. to approximately 2,600 sq. ff. and a minimum to five (5) floor plans shall be provided." R:ords 2000-12 1 C. New bullet added to change what had been 2,600 sq. ft. to 3,700 sq. ft. and five (5) floor plans to three (3) floor plans. "The homes in Planning Areas 8 and '10/11/12 shall range in size from 1,500 sq. ft. to approximately 3,700 sq. ft. and a minimum to three (3) floor plans shall be provided." Section 3. Environmental Determination. These minor amendments affect only the unit sizes and number of variations found in the Design Guidelines of the Margarita Village Specific Plan. The Margarita Village Specific Plan includes a variety of design standards, which were pad of the consideration of the previous Environment Impact Report for the Margarita Village Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The changes requested are all within the range of Design Guidelines previously considered. As a result, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) and a determination of consistency with a project for which an EIR was previously certified (Section 15162 - subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations of the CEQA Guidelines). Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining pads of this Ordinance. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 10th day of October, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC · City Clerk [SEAL] R:ords 2000-12 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2000-12 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of October, 2000, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of October, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:ords 2000-12 3 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:20 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Comerchero presiding. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Nagger, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, and Comerchero ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of August 8, 2000. 2 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Rancho California Sports Park Field Li.qhtin.q - Proiect No. PW00-19CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the project plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the construction of Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting - Project No. PW00-19CSD. 3 Authorization to release a formal bid for the Desiltation Pond Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Desiltation Pond Project. 4 Tract No. 29036 - Service Level B and Service Level D Rates and Char,qes (located on the southeast side of Via La Vida) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes.csd\092600 1 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000715 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 29036 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 200t-2002 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 5 Water Park Feasibility Study Professional Services Contract RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award a professional services contract of $28,000 to the Natelson Company, Inc. for the preparation of a feasibility study for a Water Park; 5.2 Approve a 10% contingency of $2,800 for the project. MOTION: Agency Member Roberts moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 5. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Agency Member Naggar who abstained with regard to Item Nos. 2, 3, and 4 and Agency Member Comerchero who abstained with regard to Item No. 4. DISTRICT BUSINESS 6 Temecula Public Library Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Temecula Public Library Master Plan. Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse presented the staff report (as per agenda material). In an effort to ensure a state-of-the-art facility with regard the technology element of this project, Ms. Ruse advised that this element would be readdressed once full funding has been made available. If the District were to approve the Master Plan, Ms. Ruse advised that LPA, Inc. would begin with the construction document phase of the project to ensure a shelf- ready project once funding is secured. In closing, Ms. Ruse thanked each member of the Project Design Committee for his/her diligence and countless hours of dedication to this project. Senior Management Analyst Adams provided information with regard to Proposition No. 14 (Library Construction Bond), advising that this $350 million bond is based on a 65% State and 35% local matching share; referenced disbursement language; commented on the time table; and apprised of upcoming public workshops. By way of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Rick Demado, representing LPA, Inc., in detail, reviewed the final Master Plan and referenced the design development elements such as architectural treatments (interior/exterior), floor plan layout, colors/materials, furnishings, lighting elements, signage schedule, and landscaping design. District Member Pratt relayed his support of the proposed design plan. Minutes.csd~092600 2 In response to District Member Naggar, Mr. Demado advised that provisions will be provided to ensure that the neighboring residential area will not be impacted by glaring headlights pulling into the Library parking lot. On behalf of the Friends of the Temecula Library, Ms. Grace Mellman, 36500 DePortola, extended heartfelt gratitude to the City Council and staff for the opportunity to serve on the Library Project Design Committee; commended LP^, Inc. for paying particular attention to the details and, thereby, creating a beautiful yet functional Library design; and, therefore, requested that the District approve the Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library. Noting that the City has outgrown its current Library, Mr. Raul Herrera, 33243 Fox Road, on behalf of the Friends of the Temecula Library, extended his compliments and commended the Project Design Committee on a job well done and, therefore, encouraged the District to approve this Master Plan. Ms. Marginia Kelly, 31201 Corte Alhambra, commented on the cooperative efforts and the enthusiastic participation of all those involved; commended the Project Design Committee, the City, the County, and LP^, Inc. on a job well done; and requested that the District support the approval of this Master Plan. District Member Stone, as a Project Design Committee member, relayed his pleasure in having had the opportunity to work with the talented individuals involved; commented on the cooperative efforts of all those involved; noted that the City designed its Library; and expressed his support of this Master Plan. Commenting on the Committee's commitment to this project and attention to detail, District Member Roberts, as a Project Design Committee member, relayed his support of the final version of the Master Plan. MOTION: District Member Stone moved to approve the Temecula Public Library Master Plan. The motion was seconded by District Member Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. President Comerchero expressed appreciation to the Project Design Committee, staff, and all those involved for their efforts and involvement. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT No additional comments. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No comments. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT Having been involved in several Master Plans on various public facilities/park projects, General Manager Nelson praised the project and commended Community Services Director Parker, Community Services Deputy Director Ruse, Senior Management Analyst Adams, Development Services Administrator McCarthy, and Management Analyst Smith on a job well done. Mr. Nelson Minutes.csd\092600 3 as well extended appreciation to LPA, Inc. on an outstanding project, one which will benefit the citizens of the City of Temecula for many years to come. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:57 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, October 10, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, President Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes,csd\092600 4 ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~,~/ CITY ATTORNEY ~11 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~] GENERAL MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT General Manager/Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services October 24, 2000 Award of Construction Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project - Project No. PW00-01 PREPARED BY: /J~l~/Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project, Project No. PW00-01to Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing for $104,888.16, and authorize the President to execute the contract. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $10,488.82, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On September 26, 2000, the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project will provide for the removal of appreximately 10,000 cubic yards of silt and dirt which have filled in the eastern shoreline over the last few years. The work will also include the removal of native vegetation to allow access to the site. The disturbance will be mitigated on a one-for-one basis in accordance with Fish and Game and Army Corps of Engineers permits for this project. Finally, the project will remove and replace some damaged fencing around the area of work. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $120,000.00. Eleven (11 ) bids were received and publicly opened on October 12, 2000 and results are as follows: 1. Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing .................................................................. $104,888.16 2. McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc ......................................................... $106,935.20 3. Hemet Mfg. Company, Inc ........................................................................... $125,777.00 4. C & B Excavating, Inc .................................................................................. $126,190.00 5. Sean Malek Engineering & Construction ..................................................... $143,942.00 6. American Contracting, Inc ............................................................................ $152,939.50 7. Pacific Hydretech .................................................................................. $170,517.00 8. E.V. Constructors, Inc .................................................................................. $224,462.73 9. San Bernardino Construction, Inc ................................................................ $224,746.00 10. Hubbs & Ferante .................................................................................. $237,888.00 11. Templeton Engineering, Inc ......................................................................... $269,182.00 1 r:~agdrpt\00\1024\pwO 1-00.awd/smc Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing of Gardena, California to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Staff has contacted references and determined that Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing has satisfactorily per-[ormed similar type of work in the past. The specifications allow Forty-five (45) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in October, 2000 and be completed by the mid January 2000. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project is funded with Capital Project Reserves. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-190-171-5804. The total construction cost is $115,376.98, which includes the contract amount of $104,888.16 plus 10% contingency of $10,488.82. ATTACHMENT: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Contract 2 r:~agdrpt\00\1024~pwO 1 -O0.awd/smc Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing of Gardena, California to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing is currently and is per-[orming satisfactorily, The specifications allow Forty-five (45) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in October, 2000 and be completed by the mid January 2000. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project is funded with Capital Project Reserves. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-190-171-5804. The total construction cost is $115,376.98, which includes the contract amount of $104,888.16 plus 10% contingency of $10,488.82. ATTACHMENT: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Contract 2 r:\agdrpt\00\1024\pw01-00.awd/smc oo TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PWOO-O'I CSD RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK DESIL TATION PROJECT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 24th day of October, 2000,by and between the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing and Design of Southern California Enterprises hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW00-01CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK DESlLTATION PROJECT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Previsions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-01CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK DESlLTATION PROJECT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general previsions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Prevision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-01CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK DESlLTATION PROJECT. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. CONTRACT CA-1 R:~cip~projects\pw00-01~contract Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW00-01CSD RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK DESILTATION PROJECT All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT. DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE HUNDRED FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY EIGHT DOLLARS and SIXTEEN CENTS ($104,888.16), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by DISTRICT. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. CONTRACT CA-2 R:~cip~projects\pw00-0 l~contrac! UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on forms provided by the DISTRICT. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The District hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2%ofamountin excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum of one thousand dollars ($500.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACT CA-3 R:~cip~projects~p,,,,O0-0 l~onb'act 10. 11. 12. 13. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the DISTRICT. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONTRACT CA-4 R:~cip~projects~pwO0-0 l~contract 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. CONTRACT CA-5 R:~cip~projects~pw00-0 l~contract 22. 23. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant convenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-6 R:~cip\projects~pwO~Ol~ontract IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Clubb Grading & Pacific Roofing & Design of So. Calif. Enterprises 614 W. 184~ St. Gardena, CA 90248 (877) 473-3464 By: Kimberly Ingram, President DATED: CITY OFTEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APPROVED ASTO FORM: By: Jeff Comerchero, President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-7 R:~cip~projectsywO0-0 l~contract TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINAN.~F~,~ CITY MANAGER L~J/ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services October 24, 2000 Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. A trails questionnaire was mailed out to the residents in mid-September with approximately 450 responses returned. A community workshop was held on September 21, 2000, and a second community workshop is scheduled for October 28, 2000. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM Design Group on July 11,2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be constructed on the City's northwest sports park site. Statements of Qualifications were received on February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A design contract was awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board of Directors meeting. The sub-committee will be meeting on November 7, 2000. The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPA is currently working on construction documents for submittal for first plan check. The tot lot replacement project at Rancho California Sports Park is scheduled for completion at the end of October 2000. The project includes the replacement of the rubberized surfacing and replacement of the playground structure with a new jungle themed Little Tykes play structure. R:~ZIGLERG~XDEPTRPTx0010.doc October 19, 2000 On June 15, 2000, staff released an RFQ requesting a Statement of Qualifications to prepare a feasibility study for the development of a Water Park. A contract was awarded to the Natelson Company at the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting, for the preparation of the Water Park Feasibility Study. The first sub-committee meeting is scheduled for October 24, 2000. Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum intedor space planning, exhibit design, fabrication, construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000. Staff will begin negotiating with the top ranked firm. Staff anticipates bringing forward a recommendation to award a design contract in the next 30 days. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation staff is currently coordinating the Annual Halloween Spooktacular to be held on October 28, 2000, at the Temecula Roller Hockey Arena. In addition, the Recreation Division is currently putting together their Winter/Spring edition of the Guide to Leisure Activities, as well as the annual holiday festivities scheduled for the month of December. The Recreation Division continues to program classes, activities and excursions at all City recreation facilities. R:~ZIGLERGLXDEPTRPT~010.doc October 19, 2000 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:57 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, and Chairman Roberts. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None. Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of August 8, 2000. MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchere and voice vote reflected unanimous approval EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comment. R:\Minutes\092600 1 ADJOURNMENT At 8:57 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, October 10, 2000, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Robe,s, Chairman A"FI'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:~linutes\092600 1 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ,¢~ TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Meyer, Redevelopment Director ~ John October 24, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of October 24, 2000 for the Redevelopment Department. HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Pro.qram Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 00-01. One loan has closed for $24,000. Residential Improvement Pro.qrams The program budget for FY 00/01 is $250,000 and $63,000 has been funded. Request for Qualifications - Affordable Housin.q Agency staff is negotiating with two development partners to develop 75 -100 affordable housing units within the Pujol neighborhood. Request for Qualifications - Senior Housint3 Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rehab 96 units for affordable senior housing. Request for Qualifications - Old Town Community Theater The amhitect, Fisher Merriman Sehgal and Yanez Inc., has conducted stakeholder and community interviews and is completing the schematic phase of the project. R:~SYERSK~fONTHLLY~eport.octO0.doc Old Town TradinR Post Agency staff is handling the acquisition and relocation of the Trading Post property. Escrow closed on August 25, 2000. Facade Improvement/Non-Conformino Si~n Pro_(Iram The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: · Mad Madeline's Front Deck and Paint · Bufterfield Inn Paint and Sign The following facade improvements are underway: · The Country Goose Signs · Grace Garden Gift Shop Signs · Circle K Center in Old Town The Redevelopment Agency has negotiated assistance for the rehabilitation of the center. Plans, which include western-style architectural enhancements, are in the design phase. · Old Town PromotionslMarketin.q The Agency is sponsoring a Howl-o-ween SpooktaculadFall Festival in Old Town on October 28 and 29 to include various activities. R:~SYERSK~MONTHLLY~report.oct00.doc ITEM 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~_E~/~. '(,._ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/C,~l Debbie UbnosRb; Director of Planning October 24, 2000 Rancho Highlands Drive General Plan Amendment (Planning Application PA99-0451 ) PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Saied Naaseh, Project Planner IV The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: ADOPT a Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA99-0451; and, 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE FROM OPEN SPACE TO HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL, IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 944-330- 019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451) BACKGROUND: The purpose of this City initiated amendment is to correct a mapping inconsistency between the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the General Plan Land Use Map. The General Plan Amendment, if approved, would change the designation on 1.4 acres of property from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. This "clean-up" General Plan Amendment would apply to most of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23624. This item was presented to the Planning Commission at their August 18, 1999 and December 8, 1999 meetings. The Commission unanimously denied the request due to the proposal's perceived inconsistency with the Specific Plan, by reducing Open Space acreage and increasing developable area, associated traffic impacts with the amendment, and the need for a Specific Plan Amendment to require the development of an alternative transportation system such as a Park-N-Ride or a pedestrian bridge over 1-15. However, after the Commission's decision, the City Attorney reviewed the proposal and agreed with staff's interpretation of the designation of the area as Highway Tourist Commercial instead of Open Space. Staff also believes that the Commission's recommendation may further City's R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc I planning goals; however, using this proposal to reach these goals does not make lega~ sense and is not consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan. DISCUSSION Prior to the discussion of this proposal, two points need to be kept in perspective. First, this proposal should be viewed as correcting a mapping error and not a land use decision. Second, this specific plan was prepared many years ago (1984) and it is not very concise in delivering information; therefore, a certain amount of research within the Specific Plan document and other factors is necessary to conclude the intentions of the specific plan. The following points lead to staff's original recommendation to approve this General Plan Amendment changing the designation of the subject site from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial: Figure 6 is the amended Land Use Plan for this Specific Plan. It was prepared in a "bubble" style and is intended to show only the general boundaries of each particular Planning Area. It generally identifies the zoning for the subject site as Open Space/Major Slope. In addition, Figure 12 shows all the Natural Open Space/Manufactured Slope areas within the Specific Plan. Figure 12 shows the designation for the subject site as Natural Open Space/Manufactured Slope, again in a "bubble" form. It is common planning practice to precisely identify the boundaries for these "bubbles" at later stages of development such as approval of tentative tract maps. In fact, when the County approved Tentative Parcel Map 23624 in 1989, three parcels where created. As a standard practice, the County designates Open Space parcels as lettered lots. None of the three parcels were identified as lettered lots. Two of these parcels have already been developed with the Embassy Suites and Marie Calendars. To further validate that the subject site is not an Open Space parcel is the commercial rate assessments levied on the parcel by CFD 88-12. Figure 13 is the original conceptual Grading Plan for the Specific Plan. The legend for this exhibit contains a listing for "Natural Open Space"; however, no natural open space areas are actually shown on it. Because natural open space is shown on the legend and not identified on this exhibit, staff believes that the open space areas in the original Specific Plan were eliminated when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988. This exhibit shows the majority of the subject property as a graded pad. The current physical condition of the site is consistent with this exhibit. When this Grading Plan is overlaid with Land Use Plan and the Open Space and Recreation Plan, it becomes clear that the subject site cannot be designated as natural open space or manufactured slope since it is a graded pad. Therefore, this discrepancy further validates staff's position on the proposed Land Use Designation of the site. R:\G P A~PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2,doc 2 SUMMARY Based upon the above analysis, staff and the City Attorney believe that the site had originally been envisioned to contain only manufactured landscaped slopes and not open space. These slopes were supposed to provide a transition area between two adjacent Planning Areas. However, the need for an extensive transition in this area was eliminated when the Parcel Map was approved and site was graded. In addition, CFD 88-12 has always levied the site as a developable commercial property. As a result, Staff and the City Attorney are recommending the City Council to overturn the Planning Commission's denial of this request. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts or any impacts beyond those identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, these potential increases are not considered significant and Planning Commission recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted. FINDINGS To approve a General Plan Amendment, the following findings must be made: The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses, as the site is adjacent to similarly designated Highway/Tourist Commercial properties developed as a hotel and a restaurant. In addition, the site is adjacent to 1-15 and high density residential. The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. In fact, the amendment is necessary because of a mapping error when the General Plan Land Use Map was prepared. 3. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 00- - Blue Page 4 Exhibits - Blue Page 7 A. Location Map B Existing General Plan Map December 8, 1999, Planning Commission Staff Report Blue Page 12 December 8, 1999, Planning Commission Minutes- Blue Page 13 R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-__ R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 944-330-019 {PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA99-0451, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0451 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0451 on December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of Planning Application No. PA99-0451; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA99-0451 on December 14, 1999, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA99- 0451; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA99-0451; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA99- 0451 (General Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following findings: A. The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses, as the site is adjacent to similarly designated Highway/Tourist Commercial properties developed as a hotel and a restaurant. In addition, the site is adjacent to 1-15 and high density residential. B. The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. In fact, the amendment is necessary because of a mapping error when the General Plan Land Use Map was prepared. R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 5 C. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. Amendments To The General Plan Land Use Map The City Council hereby amends the General Plan Land Use Map for the parcels identified as APN 944-330-0219; change the Land Use Designation from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendment will not result in impacts beybnd those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, the City Council determines that the potential impacts of this change was adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. Section 5. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any roason a court of competent jurisdiction shah hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 24th day of October 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 00-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,2000 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\G P A\PA99-0451 \451PA99 CC2.doc 7 EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 8 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT - A LOCATION MAP CASE NUMBER: PA99-0451 CITY COUNCIL DATE - OCTOBER 24, 2000 R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 9 EXHIBIT B EXISTING GENERAL PLAN MAP R:\G P A\PA99-0451 \451PA99 CC2.doc 10 CITY OF TEMECULA CC O OS EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION CASE NUMBER: PA99-0451 CITY COUNCIL DATE - OCTOBER 24, 2000 R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:\G P A\PA99-0451 \451PA99 CC2.doc 12 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 8, 1999 Planning Application No. PA99-0451 (General Plan Amendment) Prepared By: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: APPROVE a Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA99-0451; and, ADOPT Resolution No. 99-~ recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0451 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROPOSAL: To amend the General Plan Land Use Map to change the Land Use Designation for a Portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. LOCATION: Between Rancho Highlands Ddve and Interstate 15 (also identified as Assessors Parcel Number 944-330-019) EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan (SP-2) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: East: South: West: Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Open Space EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDINGLAND USE: North: East: South: West: Highway Tourist Commercial Vacant Vacant Interstate 15 PROJECTAREA 1.4 acres \~TEMEC_FS 101\VO L1 ~Depts~P LAN NING~STAFFR PT~451 PA99. PC.doc 1 BACKGROUND This item was initially presented to the Planning Commission at their August 18, 1999 meeting. At that time, the Commission continued this General Plan Amendment off calendar to provide staff an opportunity to gather additional information. The purpose of this amendment is to correct a mapping discontinuity between the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the General Plan Land Use Map. The General Plan Amendment, if approved, would change the designation on 1.4 acres of property from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. Based upon staff's review of the Specific Plan, staff believes that the area in question was intended to be open space when the Specific Plan was adopted in 1988. Staff believes that the site had originally been envisioned to contain manufactured landscaped slopes. These slopes were supposed to provide a transition area between two adjacent Planning Areas. Much of the need for a transition area was eliminated when the site was graded and used as a borrow site in the early 1990s. To further assist the Commission in their deliberations, staff has re-reviewed various sections of the Specific Plan and assembled the following information about this area and the "open space" areas within the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. Section IIl.A.2.d on page 16: The Open Space/Recreation discussion states that the 1988 amendments to the Specific Plan would reduce the amount of open space/major slopes within the project from 60.6 to 34.3 acres. The change represented a shift from away from non-usable slope areas toward more active recreation sites. The odginal Specific Plan had no park or recreation facilities shown on the plan. The need to amend the Specific Plan had occurred when the exact location of the Wildomar Fault was identified. Its discovery made a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan undevelopable. The key fact here is that major slope areas were considered to be open space within the Plan. The definition of open space used in the Specific Plan is very different from the definition commonly in use by the City of Temecula. The City Planning Department does not consider manufactured slopes to be open space since none of the underlying plant and animal resources remain after the grading and landscaping processes ara completed. Section III.A.7 Open Space and Recreation Plan on pages 26 through 28: The open space issues are discussed in more detail in Section 7. This section states that the Open Space and Recreation Plan includes natural open space, two lakes, and recreation centers (paragraph I on page 26). There is another reference to open space in Paragraph 3 that talks about the acreage of "open space/major slopes" within the project. Most of the rest of this section discusses the proposed recreation facilities. Figure 12 shows all the "Natural Open Space/Manufactured Slope" areas within the project. The area of the proposed General Plan Land Use Map change is shown on Figure 12 as a Natural Open Space/Manufactured Slope. Figure 13: The conceptual Grading Plan for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan also provides information about future open space areas within the Plan. Specifically, the legend for the conceptual grading exhibit contains a listing for "Natural Open Space". When the exhibit is examined, no natural open space areas are actually shown on this Plan. Because natural open space is shown on the legend and not identified on the conceptual grading exhibit, staff believes that the open space areas in the odginal Specific Plan were eliminated when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988. The original Rancho Highlands Specific Plan did contain some natural open space areas. \~TEMEC_FS 101\VOLI'~Depts~PLAN NING~STAFFRP'I'~451PA99. PC.doc 2 Finally, Figure 6, the Land Use Plan, has been prepared in a "bubble" style and is intended to show only the general development area for each particular Planning Area. As a result, staff believes that the "open space" area in question, was intended to depict a transition area between Planning Area 2 (commercial) and Planning Area 6 (high density residential/commercial). This interpretation is further supported by Riverside County's approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23624 in 1989. At that time, a single parcel representing Planning Area 2, was subdivided into three commercial sites. None of the three parcels contained an identification that an undevelopable open space lot was being created. The other two lots of Parcel Map 23624 already contain Highway Tourist oriented commercial uses. In conclusion, staff believes that the open space areas within the Rancho Highland Specific Plan were never intended to be open space as we currently understand it. The information in the Specific Plan, when taken as a whole, indicates that these areas were originally intended to represent landscaped transitional areas between the different land use planning areas. As a result, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed clean-up amendment to the General Plan. A copy of these various pages from the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan are in Attachment No. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts or any impacts beyond those identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, these potential increases are not considered significant and staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted. FINDINGS To recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: 1. The amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. Attachments: PC Resolution No. 99-__ - Blue Page 4 Exhibit A - Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 7 Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 11 Selected pages from the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan - Blue Page 12 Exhibits - Blue Page 13 A. Location Map B Existing General Plan Map F:~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRP'r~451PA99 - PC.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-.__ \\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~Depts~PLANNING~STA FF R p'~451 PA99 - PC.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 04~1)" WHEREAS, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA99-0451, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0451 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecuia Valley Chamber of Commerce; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0451 on December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; and - WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0451; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of this General Plan Amendment, make the following findings: The amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that the proposed General Plan Amendment would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council make a determination that the potential impacts of this change were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and \\TEMEC_FS 101 ~VOL1 ~Depts~P LAN NING~STAFFR PT~451PA99. PC.doc 5 that no further environmental analysis is required. Section 4. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0451 (General Plan Amendment) and recommends that the City Council do the following approve a Resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944- 330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451)" substantially in the form that is attached as Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 199__. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of December, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEM EC_FS 101 \VOL1 ~Depts'~PLANNIN G~STAFFRP'IA451 PA99 - PC.doc 6 EXHIBIT A DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 99-.~ \~TEMEC_FS 1011VOL1/Depts~PLANNING~STAFF R pTI451PA99. PC.doc 7 EXHIBIT a RESOLUTION NO. 99~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA99-0451, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0451 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0451 on December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; .............. WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the~Commission-headng andaffer due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval-of Planning Application No. PA99-0451; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA99-0451 on December 14, 1999, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA99-0451; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA99-0451; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by ..... reference~ ~ :-~- -. . Section 2. Findinqs The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-0451 (General Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following findings: a. This amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. B. This amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. This amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. \\TEMEC_FS 101\VOLI~Depts~PLAN NING~STAFFR PT~451 PA99 - PC.doc 8 Section 3. Amendments To The General Plan Land Use Map The City Council hereby amends the General Plan Land Use Map for the parcels identified as APN 944-330-0219; change the Land Use Designation from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendment will not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, the City Council determines that the potential impacts of this change was adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. Section 5. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of December, 1999. A'I-I'EST: Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,199 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: \\TEM EC_FS 101\VOLI~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFR p'r~51 PA99 - PC.doc 9 Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk \\TEMEC_FS 101\VOLI~Depts~PLAN NING~STAFFRPT~,51 PA99- PC.doc 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 INITIAL STUDY \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI~Depts~PLAN NIN G~STAFFRP'F~451PA99. PC.doc 11 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Planning Application PA99-0451 - Rancho Highlands Ddve Generel Plan Land Use Map Amendment Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number David Hogan, Senior Planner (909) 694-6400 Project Location West of Rancho Highlands Drive, immediately east of Interstate 15 in the City of Temecula. Project Sponsor's Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 General Plan Designation Open Space Zoning Specific Plan (SP-2) Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Amend the General Plan Land Use Map for a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan from Open Space to Highway Toudst Commercial to correct a mapping en~r from the earlier adoption of the General Plan. The underlying Specific Plan land use and site development requirements are not being changed by this amendment. Any future development of the site will comply with the appropriate development and environmental review requirements. The site is located in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan in an area identified for urban scale development. The current adjacent land uses are as follows: North: Commercial (the Embassy Suites Hotel) East: Vacant South: Vacant - ~we-~t:' interstate 15 - ' Other public agencies whose approval None. is required F:~Dep~s~ LANNING~,CEQA~451PA99 lES.doc 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Planning Housing Water Air Quality ~esources Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resoumes Recreation None nificance Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not significant'effect in this case-because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or ~potentially significant unless mitigated' impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT but it mi ~ the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earl;er EIR or NEGATIVE · DECLARAT!ON:p.ursuantto applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are ~g further is required. Signature Date Printed name For F:~Depts~P LANNING~CEOA~451 PA99 lES.doc 2 1. Land Use end Planning. Would the project: a. Physically"divide an establi~'~ed c~'~i~i~i~''~'''~''''' b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation ,/ of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? (1) c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (2) Comments: The proposal is intended to correct a mapping error that occurred dudng the odginal General Plan process. The site was inadvertently designated as open space when itwas part of Planning Area No. 2. The Open Space on the General Plan was, in Rancho Highlands Specific Plan, manufactured and landscaped slopes that were intended to represent a transition area between future commercial and residential areas. The Rancho Highlands Specific Plan did not identify any environmental resources that would be protected. The project will not conflict with the applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by the agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project will not divide an established community. The site is located in a commercial area between Rancho Highlands Ddve and Interstate 15. There is no established community on or near the site to be divided by this proposal. There are also no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans applicable to the site. Therefore, no significant impacts will result from the proposed project. --- 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: i!i !iiii!ii!iii!:.!iiiiiiiiiiii ~::ii':ii::~::~::::iii::::::i::ii~i~ ~ ,,~.~ ~ .................................... a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directJy (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Dispi&ce substantial numbers of existing housing, necassit~_fing the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (3) c. Displace substantial numbers Of people, necessitating the - constructibn--0fmplacemeht housing elsewhere? (3) Comments: 3. The project will not induce new population growth within the area and will not displace existing residential ............ structures or area'residents~ The project is the COrrection of a mapping error for a commercial zone within an approved specific plan. As a result, no displacement impacts are associated with this proposal. F:~Depts~P LAN NING~C EQA~L51 PAg9 lES.doc 3 3. GEOLOGY AND BOILS. Would the project? a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the dsk of loss, injury, or death involving: (1,2,3) i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recant Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidenca of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidenca, liquefaction or collapse? (3) d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial dsks to life or property? e. Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altamafive wastewater disposal systems ......~-wher~ se~-e~s are. not avail~b.t~ fb~_~-disp-0-~ 0~ ~' wastewater? Comments: The project is a General Plan Land Use Map correction and will not expose people or structures to potential substan'dal adverse effects. Any specific development proposals will receive the appropriate environmental review when the detailed project is ready for consideration. The General Plan identifies significant seismic hazards near the project area. The General Plan EIR also identifies numerous mitigation measures that will be applied when development occurs. These measures have the ability to reduca the impacts from various seismic-related hazards. The project (a General Plan Land Use Map correction) has no potential for soil subsidenca and slope instability. In addition, no onsite waste disposal is being proposed. As a result, no significant effects ara anticipated as a result of this project. 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. Viola~ any wa~r quali~ standards or ~ste dis~arge requirement? b. Subs~fially deplete gmun~ater supplies or intedem subs~ally ~ gmun~ter m~arge su~ ~at ~em would be a net defter in aquifer volume or a lowering of · e Io~1 gmun~ater ~ble level (e.g., ~e pr~u~on rote of p~e~sfing ne~y wells would drop to a level whi~ would not suppo~ existing land uses or plann~ uses for F:~DeI~s~PLANN ING~CEQA~455 PA99 lES.doc c. which permits have been granted)? (2) Sub~ia[~[ially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a mannerwhich would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (3) d. Substantially altar the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? (3) e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm watar drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutad runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (4) h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or radiract flood flows? (4) i. Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of loss, ~njury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (4) j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (2,4) Comments: - ' 4. The proposed amendment will not alter or impact physical areas where flood hazards have been identified within the City's boundaries and will not effect water quantity or quality. As a result, no significant impact have been identified. 5. AIR QUAUTY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following detarminations. Would the project: ~i~ ~ii~i~!~i~!i~ ~ ~ i~===i![ii~l~i:=i::i=:ii ................... a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (1,2) b. Violata any air quality standard or contribute sUbstantially "~' to~n existing-or projected air quality ViOlation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment.under an applicable federal or state ambient . .. air quality standard '(in~l_uding r~lea-~-ng emissions wh ch = exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precu~sof~? ..... - d. Expose se~3sil~ve receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affe~ng a substantial number of people? (2) F:~Dep~s~PLANNING~CEQA~451 PA99 lES.doc 5 Comments: 5. The proposed amendment, a mapping error correction to the General Plan Land Use Map, will not alter or effect air quality. As a resolL'no significant impacts have been identified. 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ,/ relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads~ or congestion at intersections? (2) b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of V' service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either V' an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Subai,=~ dJally i~c~uase hazards due to a design feature V' (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? ,/ f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? V' g. Conflict with adupied policies, plans, or programs V' supporting alternative tra__n~0~ti0~ .(~g.;ibu.s_ tUm0uts. _ bicycle racks? (1) ' -' Comments: 6. Any potential impacts associated with this project have been addressed through the EIR for the citywide General Plan that evaluated the cumulative b-a[;ic impacts of all development in the City. In addition, the EIR for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan also discussed the impacts of the entire Specific Plan area (including this site). As a result, no significant impacts ara anticipated as a result of this project. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a. Have a subset[iai adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in ~local or. regional Plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Calif0~ia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (2) b. Have a suba;-.;;al adverse effect on any dpadan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (2) F:~Depts~P LANNING~CEQA~451 PA99 lES.doe 6 c. Have a sub~,[ial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere subs;antJally with the movement of any native ,/ resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (2,3) e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ,/' biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ~ f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: 7 The site has already been graded and disturbed and contains no identifiable biologic resources. Prior to the approval of any detailed development proposal, the potential impacts to on site biologic resources will be evaluated. As a result, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the lOss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (1,2) b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 8. The project is a General Plan Land Use Map correction and will not impact mineral resources. In addition, no mineral resources have been identified on the site. As a result, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. .9.~_~RDS~AND HAZARDOUS.MATERIALS. Would the project: a. .C_raate a significa~ h~rd tO the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Crate a significant ha~.~,d to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? F:~eP~PLANNING~CEQA~I51 PA99 lES.doc 7 c. Emit h~Gous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hnT~rdous materials, substances, or acutely hnT~rdous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing Or proposed school? d. Be Ioca{ed on a site which is included on a list of hn~rdous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project Ioca~ud within an airport land use plan or, NA i where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (1) f. For a project within the vicinity of a pdvata airstrip, would NA the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?(1) g. Impair impleme.[aiJon of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Ex.se people or structures to a significant risk or loss, ,njury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 9.a-d. The proposed amendment, a mapping error correction to the General Plan Land Use Map will not create a public h~=s, rd or result in a the discharge of hazardous material. The project is not located in a location that would blo~ or interfere with an emergency response plan. As a result, no significant impacts have been identified. 9.e,f 9.g,h The project is not located wi~in the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport, the closest airport to the project site. Therefore, no significant impacts are possible. The site is also not expected to be affected by wildland fires. The site is located in an urban area, and Interstate 15 is between this site and the closest wildland fire area. As a result, no significant impacts have been identified. 10. NOISE. Would the project result in: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::: :::::::~:::::: .+......:.....:.........+.:......... ........ a. Exposure of peop;e to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (1,2) b. Exposure of persc,.s to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or gmundbome noise levels? (1 ~2) c. A substantial ~,e~anent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (1,2) F:~Depts~PLANNING~CEQA~451 PA99 IES.do~ 8 d. A substantial temporary or pedodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (1,2) e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, NA where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would NA the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 10. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any noise impacts. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. The project is not located within the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport, the closest airport to the project site. As a result, no significant impacts have been identified. 11. PUBUC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical ,F impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? (1,2) b. Fire protection? V' c. Police ~ru[~ction? ,~ d. Schools? V' e. Parka? V' f. ' Other public facilities? ,F Comments: The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to public services. Any futura development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a result, no impacts _ have be_e_n j_d_entifi ed 12. UTIUTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: ............... a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilitiesT the construction of which could _~_use significant F:~Depts~P LAN NIN G~CEQA~451 PA99 IES.do~ 9 environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could ~ause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 12. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to public services. Any future development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been identified. 13. AESTHETICS. Wouldthe project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, reck outcropping, and historic building within a sfafa scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: 13. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any direct aesthetic impacts. Any future development will need to comply with the Development Code and Design Guidelines that require site landscaping and higher quality architectural design. Any future development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been identified. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. ~ Cau~ a subs~nfial adveme ~ange in ~e signifl~ of V a histod~l msoume as defined in Se~ion 1506.57 F:tDePlS~P LANNIN G~C EQA~451PAg9 lES.doc t0 b. Cause a s-bs~ntiat adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57 c. Direc~;y or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those inten-ed outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 14. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to cultural resources. Any future development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been identified. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a. Would ~e pmje~ in.ease ~e use of e~sfing neigh~ood ~d ~ional pa~s or o~er m~afional fa~liaes ~ ~at subs~nfial physi~l deterioration ~dli~ ~uld o~r or be a~lemted? b. Does ~e pmje~ include m~afional fa~lifies or require · e ~ns~on or e~ansion of m~eafional fa~lifies ~i~ might have an adverse physi~l effe~ on ~e envimnmen~ Comments: 15. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to recreational facilities. Any future development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been identified. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ~ of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major pedods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? F:~Depts~P LANNINGtCEQANSt PA99 IES.do~ 11 c. J directly or indirectly? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either Comments: 16. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not effect the environment or other important statewide resources. 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the fiedng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation mee_%,.res based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 17. This project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error, does not effect the previous analysis undertaken for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the City General Plan. This proposal is consistent with both documents because the City General Plan wes developed to incorporate the approved Specific Plan. In addition, the City zoning map indicates that the project area is zoned Specific Plan. As a result, the proposal is censistant with all previous analyses. 2. 3. 4. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and EIR. FEMA Flood Map: Map No. 060742 0005 B. F:~DepIs~P LANN IN G~C EOA~451 PA99 lES.doc 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC2.doc 13 RESOLUTION NO. 99-050 ~'~A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PLANNING NO. PA99-0243 FOR TENTATIVE FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 9.75 INTO LOTS LOCATED ON THE SIDE THE CITY LIMIT AND AS ASSESSOR'~ NUMBER 9~ Add- · A Condition subjecting the I Commission. Airport Land Use · A Condition requiring the iew by the Planning Commission per staff's and the applicant's The motion was seconded Commissioner Webster and voi~ vote reflected unanimous approval. The applicant provide that this project would reflect sure quality; anb~elayed a )ject to Product Review rather than Design Guid~es Review. be~ Webster clarified that the project had been conditioned to either sub n Guidelines Review, or Product Review, specifying the latitude. Rancho Hi,qhlands Drive General Plan Amendment IPlannin,q Application PA99-0451 ) Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to change the Land Use Designation for a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. Relaying that this proposal, if approved, would be the fourth Land Use Element Amendment for the year of 1999, Senior Planner Hogan provided an overview of the staff report (of record); referenced sections of the Specific Plan (per agenda material) with respect to the Grading Plan, and the Open Space/Recreation area; provided additional information regarding the incorrect denoted acreage in the Planning Areas; with respect to Commission querying, relayed that while staff was of the opinion that a Specific Plan Amendment was not necessary, that if it was the Commission's desire, that ' the matter could be brought back to the Commission at a later date; and with respect to the proposed CIP Project to construct a pedestrian bridge over the Interstate, noted that the specific location of that project had not been determined. The Commission's conciusionary comments were, as follows: Commissioner Webster queded the lack of previsions in this particular proposal with respect to the requirement to implement a Park and Ride facility, as well as, the requirement to have a Transportation Systems Management Team and the establishment of a coordinator (in Planning Area No. 2) and with respect to Planning Area No. 2, recommended that there be a Specific Plan Amendment to address the revisions in this particular area. In response to Commissioner Fahey's comments regarding the implementation of a Park and Ride facility, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the original intent of the requirement was that there be consideration of alternative transportation details, noting that a Park and Ride facility would be one option; specified that the language was vague as to specificity, noting that the proposed pedestrian bridge could qualify as meeting this particular requirement. Commissioner Fahey relayed that since there had been no implementation of any alternative transportation plan, that if this particular site was not maintained as Open Space, this site would be the sole area available for meeting that criteria. Chairman Guerriero relayed concurrence with Commissioner Fahey's comments. While concurring with staff's recommendation that revisions were necessitated, Commissioner Webster relayed that with respect to the Land Use Plan and the Grading Plan, this proposal was cieady identified as an Open Space/Slope area; noted the intent for provision of a buffer within this area between the High Density Residential and the Office Professional, and between the freeway and the development on site, which this area satisfied; relayed concern with exceeding the development within Planning Area No. 2, in conjunction with the lack of provision for an alternative transportation element; reiterated the recommendation for a Specific Plan Amendment; and relayed that he was not in favor of this proposal. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; and to deny staff's recommendation due to the following: 1) the proposal's nonconformance with the Specific Plan, and 2) the plan to develop additional acreage, rather than maintain an Open Space area, noting the associated negative impact with respect to traffic. Chairman Guerfiere seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. It was noted that at 6:58 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 7:09 P.M. At this time the Commission considered Agenda Item No. 5. 7 ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~/,,¢~""- CITY ATTORNEY ~'~'~, ~ DIRECTOR OF FINAN~.~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City ~.~. er Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning October 24, 2000 Planning Application Nos. 99-0261 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change) and 99-0371 (General Plan Amendment) - Temecula Creek Village Project Prepared By: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council receive the Subcommittee's Verbal Report and provide the appropriate direction. BACKGROUND: On June 21,2000 the City of Temecula Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. 99-0261 to the City of Temecula City Council and on July 19, 2000 the City of Temecula Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. 99-0371 to the City of Temecula City Council. Planning Application 99-0261 proposes to adopt a Planned Development Overlay district, which will develop 32.6 vacant acres within the Professional Office (PO) zone with 20 acres of residential and 12.6 acres of commercial and Planning Application 99- 0371 proposes to remove the western portion of Via Rio Temecula from the General Plan Circulation Map. At the September 26, 2000 City Council meeting, the Council continued these items to the October 24th Council meeting and appointed a Subcommittee composed of Councilmembers Comerchero and Naggar. The Subcommittee was given the responsibility to come up with recommended alternative land uses for this site. The Subcommittee was scheduled to meet on October 17, 2000 to discuss this issue. The results of their meeting will be verbally presented to the entire Council at the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None. R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 1 Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Planned Development Overlay - 4 Ordinance Resolution approving General Plan Amendment Planning Commission Resolutions Planning Commission Staff Repod dated June 21, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes from June 21, 2000 Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 19, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes from July 19, 2000 Initial Environmental Study Correspondence Received A. LandGrant Development dated July 18, 2000 B. LandGrant Development dated August 3, 2000 Traffic Analysis from City's Traffic Engineer Planning Commission Hearing Exhibits B. C. D. E. F. G. Vicinity Map Current Zoning Current General Plan designation Current General Plan Circulation Element Map Proposed General Plan Circulation Element Map Build-out average daily traffic with Via Rio Temecula Road Build-out average daily traffic without Via Rio Temecula Road R:\P D 0\994)261 79 South\CC Staff Report.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY - 4 ORDINANCE R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH '17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-026t) WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect pdvate property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on June 27, 2000, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City Zoning Map and Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with'all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on September 26, 2000 to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map and the Temecula Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendments To The City Zonin.q Map The City Council hereby amends the Zoning Map for the City of Temecula for a parcel identified as APN 961-010-006 from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay No. 4 (PDO-4). Section 2. Planned Development Overlay No. 4 Sections 17.22.130 through 17.22.138are hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as set forth in the supplemental standards and requirements for PDO-4, Planned Development Overlay District No. 4 as contained in Exhibit 1 of this Ordinance. PDO-4 is subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit 2. Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study, and hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application 99-0261. The Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit 3 of this Ordinance. Ords~000- 1 Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 6. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certif7 that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2000- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of ,2000 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of , 2000, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:None ABSENT: 0 COUNClLMEMBERS:None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Ords~2000- 2 EXHIBIT 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~X~C PDO Ordinance.doc 3 TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.130 Title Sections 17.22.130 through 17.22.138 shall be known as 'PDO-4u (Temecula Creek village Planned Development Overlay District). 17.22.132 Purpose and Intent The Temecula Creek village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-4) is intended meet the planned mixed use criteria contained in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. These requirements ara intended to provide regulations for the creative design of, and the safe and efficient operation of a unique mixed area within the City. 17.22.134 Relationship with the Development Code end Citywide Design Guidelines A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.136. B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.138, the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area. 1. The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to any development within a Professional Office zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. deemed complete. The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is 3. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that ara in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 17.22.136 Use Regulations The list of permitted land uses for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay district is contained inTable 17.22.136.B. Planned Development Overlay-4 contains three different planning areas. Two of the areas are commercial, the third is residentially based. A copy of the Planning Area map for this PDO is contained in Exhibit 17.22.136. The three areas ara identified as follows: · Retail/Support Commercial. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4R in Table 17.22.136.B), · Village Commercial Area. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4V in Table 17.22.136.B); and, · Multi-Family Residential Planning Areas. Unless specific standards are provided forthis Planning Development Overlay, the residential development standards for the High Density Zoning District contained in Section 17.06 shall apply to this Planning Area. R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 4 Table 17.22. t36A Planning Area Exhibit Temecule Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District R:~P D 0~9-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc Where indicated with a letter "P' the use shall be a permitted use. A letter"C' indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development OveHay District Description of Use IPDO'4R I PDO'4VS A Adult business - Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (less than p p 5,000 sq. ft.) Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzeroise/martial arts studios (greater p than 5,000 sq. fl.) Airports Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) P Alcoholic beverage sales Ct Ambulance services - Animal hospital (indoor only) C Antique restoration Antique sales P Apparel and accessory shops P P= Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P Arcades (pinball and video games) Art supply stores P P= Auction houses Auditoriums and conference facilities Automobile dealers (new and used) Automobile sales (brekerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display Automobile Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs Automobile painting and body shop Automobile repair services Automobile rental C Automobile salvage yards/impound yards Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash - Automotive parts - sales P - Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine - with or without _ an automated car wash R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.dog= 6 Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4V iB Bakery goods distribution Bakery retail P P= Bakery wholesale - Banks and financial institutions P P Barber and beauty shops P P Bed and breakfast C Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) p pa Billiard parlor/pool hall Binding of books and similar publications Blood bank Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P Bookstores p pU i Bowling alley P i Building material sales I Butcher shop P Cabinet shop Camera shop (sales/minor repaim) p pO Candy/confectionery sales P P Car wash, full service Carpet and rug cleaning C - Catering services P - Clothing sales P PU Coins, purchase and sales P P Cold storage facilities C Communications'and microwave installationsz Communications equipment sales Community care facilities C Computer sales and service P Congregate care housing for the elderly~ C Construction equipment sales, service or rental Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental Convenience market P C Costume rentals P P Crematoriums R:'~P D OLq9-026t 79 So~h~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 7 Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temeculs Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4VS Cut e I P I P D Data processing equipment and systems P Day care canters C Cu Delicatessen P P Discount/department store (less than 20,000 square feet) P Distribution facility Drug store/pharmacy P P= Dry cleaners P P Dry cleaning plant E Emergency shelters - Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) P Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) F Feed and grain sales P Financial, insurance, real estate offices P P~ Fire and police stations P P Floor covering sales P Florist shop P PU Food processing Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity P P Freight terminals Fuel storage and distribution Funeral parlors, mortuary Furniture sales (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) P P= Furniture transfer and storage G Garden supplies and equipment sales and service C Gas distribution, meter and control station General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft. P Glass and mirrors, retail sales P Govemmental offices P P~ Grocery store, retail (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) P P~ Grocery store, wholesale Guns and firearm sales P - R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordlrance.doc 8 H Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4Va P Hardware stores Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. fi.) P P Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. fi.) P Health food store P P Hee~th care facility P P Heliports - Hobby supply shop p pa Home and business maintenance service P Hospitals C Hotels/motels - - Ice cream pador Impound yard Interior decorating service P P p pa Junk or salvage yard I I ' (ennel I C I L Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers Laundromat P - Laundry service (commercial) - Libraries, museums and galleries (private) P - Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution - C - Liquor stores Lithographic service Locksmith P - M Machine shop ~lachinery storage yard - Mail order businesses P - R:~P D O~99-0261 79 Soulh~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 9 Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4V8 Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, fumitura, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi- refined products requiring further processing or manufacturing, and outside storage. Uses under 20,000 sq. f. with no outside storage Massage P P Medical equipment sales/rental P Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C ~lini-storage or mini-warehouse4 Mobile home sales and service Motion picture studio Motorcycle sales and service Movie theaters Musical and recording studio N Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club -~ Nurseries (retail) C Nursing homes/convalescent homes C O Office equipment/supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft. Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, p pS i chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance !p Paint and wallpaper stores J P [ R:~ D o~a9-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc t0 Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4V Parcel delivery services Parking lots and parking structures Pawnshop Personal service shops P P Pest control services Pet grooming/pet shop P P Photographic studio P P Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) Postal distribution Postal services P P Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) P Q Reserved I I R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P Radio/television transmitter Recreational vehicle parks Recreational vehicle sales Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard Recycling collection facilities Recycling processing facilities Religious institution, without a day care or private school C Religious institution, with a private school C Religious institution, with a day care C Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business) Residential, multiple-family housing - Restaurant with drive-through window - Restaurants and other eating establishments p pU Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment - -~ Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage in _ BP and LI) Rooming and boarding houses - R:~P D 0~,q9-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 11 Table t7.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use IPD°'4R I PDO'4VS S Scale, public- Schools, business and professional - Schools, private (Idndeq;larten through Grade 12) - - Scientific research and development offices and laboratories - Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)' C - Solid waste disposal facility - Sports and recreational facilities - Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building3 - Swap Meet, outdoor - - Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales P - T Tailor shop P P Taxi or limousine service P · Tile sales P Tobacco shop P Tool and die casting Transfer, moving and storage Transportation terminals and stations Truck rentals (no sales or/service) TV/VCR repair p pu U Upholstery shop V Vending machine sales and service I I W Warahousing/distribution Watch repair P P Wedding chapels Welding shop Welding supply and service (enclosed) Y Reserved i Z Reserved R:~ D O~99-0261 79 South~CC POO Ordinance.doc 12 1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G), special standards for the sale of alcoholic beverages. 2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 3. See Section 17.08.050.(E), special standards for indoor swap meets. 4. See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse facilities. 5. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and performance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050. H. 6. The size of the use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet. 7. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted provided that the outside noise levels do not interfere with off-site conversation. 8. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area. Retail/Support Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4R. Village Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4V. Multi-Family Planning Areas A & B use the High Density column in Table 17.06.030. 17.22.138 Supplemental Design and Setback Standards A. Multi-Family. The requirements of the residential component shall depend upon the final approved residential density. Residential densities less than 12 units per acre shall comply with the Medium Density Residential zone standards set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code. Residential densities in excess of 12 units per acre shall complywith the High Density Residential zone standards set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code. The final maximum residential density shall be determined by a traffic analysis provided to the City when an application for development is submitted. The total future project trip generation shall not exceed the number of trips allowable under the General Plan designation for the site. B. Retail/Support Commercial. Thee development standards for the Professional Office zoning designation set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code shall be utilized for the Retail/Support Commercial planning area. The Village Planning Area for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay has supplemental design guidelines integrated into this PDO. These guidelines are intended to augment the previously adopted Citywide Design Guidelines with requirements specific to this area and are as follows: R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 13 2 TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE VILLAGE The Village area will serve as the vital activity center of Temecula Creek Viltage. Centrally located within the project, this group of buildings will contain a welcome mixture of goods and services to complement life in the multi-family neighborhoods. A state-of-the-art clubhouse facility will provide space for meeting rooms, a library and reading rooms, computer rooms and other resident amenities, as well as a "signature" pool and spa. A. MIX OF USES The site of the proposed Village area is approximately seven acres, and will contain a variety of shops and services, including: -retail stores -restaurants -recreational facilities -commercial services -medical and dental offices In some cases, office uses could be located above ground floor retail spaces. In addition, the ancillary uses of the residential neighborhoods, such as the Community Clubhouse with its amenities and Support Retail will be located in the Central Retail Hub. B. SITE ORGANIZATION The buildings in the village core will be organized around the a central spine, which is also the primary entry corddor to the development. 1. The mixed-use buildings planned for the Village Hub area will be sited in such a way that their walls help to define the streetscape. a. The buildings closest to State Highway 79 will be located at the minimum required front setback from that road. 2. The primary driveway into the complex will be framed by buildings on either side, creating a "gateway" into the central circulation corridor. 3. Additional buildings will be organized along the corridor, with their entries pushed to the "imagined" property line along the circulation road (the back of the sidewalk), creating an "urban" environment, Pedestrian pass-throughs will be created in the gaps between buildings ("paseos") to give access from parking areas. 4. The buildings sited along the boulevard will be separated to allow vehicular entry into the parking areas, which will be located behind (and in some cases beside) ~e buildings. 6. The visual axis of the central corddor will be terminated by the community center building and its associated open space. path of travel path of Eavel ~estdar VILLAGE HUB $ T 0 U T E II B 0 R 0 U G II ~ TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE 'VILLAGE' C. PARKING AND CIRCULATION The clustering of related uses in the Village Retail Core makes shared parking opportunities possible. The mix of offices, with their predominant daytime use, with retail and restaurants, busy primarily at night, creates a. reciprocal parking condition. For this reason, the village parking demand would be lower than what is otherwise required by the City of Temecula's Development Code. It is proposed that the total demand of the anticipated uses will be five spaces per thousand square feet of leasable retail/office area. 1. Direct vehicular access to the Village will be available via a proposed controlled intersection along Highway 79 South onto the project's principle entry drive. This tree- lined street will provide easy ingress to and egress from the parking areas serving the facilities, in addition to angled parking spaces located on the drive itself. Auto circulation will feature a continuous loop through the public area of the village, helping to alleviate congestion in this part of the site. AUTO CIRCULATION IN VILLAGE HUB 2. Parking lots will be located behind (and in some cases beside) the proposed buildings, so that the buildings help to screen the parking areas. The lots will be landscaped to soften the hard edges of the paving, and provide pockets of shade. PARKING CONFIGURATION ~ RETAIL VILLAGE 3. The "downtown" core will also be served by double rows of diagonal parking, angled in the direction of travel both in and out of the village area. Pedestrian "collector" walks will be detailed with contrasting paving materials leading to identified crosswalks. a. Accessible parking will be located in the angled parking which is curbside near retail entries. b. Crosswalks will be laid out to coincide with pedestrian plaza areas. 4. Convenient bike parking will be provided in the Village core to encourage human-powered travel in this area. PEDESTRIAN GATHERING AREA TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE 'VILLAGE' D. PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACES Generous landscaped plaza areas are planned in the midst of the retail village to encourage the accumulation of patrons in the core who will visit a number of establishments on any given outing. 1. These outdoor gathering areas will be linked to the system of walkways and bike paths which traverse the site, creating convenient access for residents. 2. Pedestrian gathering areas will be made comfortable through the inclusion of amenities which encourage rest stops: -benches and shade structures or trees -trash cans and (where applicable) ash urns -kiosks E. BUILDING SCALE AND DESIGN 4 d. large openings with clear glass will be provided at the street level to provide increased visibility into the retail spaces. e. select staggering of upper and lower floors to avoid unbroken two-story wall surfaces. f. use of staggered parapet heights and sloping roof forms to give variety to building "skylines." 3. Buildings with ground floor retail will be set close to the streets to facilitate pedestrian access. 4. Restaurants and food uses within the village will be encouraged to provide outdoor dining facilities. Where possible, these "fresh-air" eating patios should adjoin pedestrian walkways. 1. The Village area structures will be limited to one or two stories, and will be designed to be comptementary to the existing residential scale of the neighborhood. ~e Pam RETAIL ELEVATION ~ ENTRY 2. Buildings will be designed to include sufficient articulation of their mass to provide an adequate sense of scale. Spec'~c details which may be used for this purpose include: a. Offsetting portions of the buildings to avoid long expanses of unbroken wall surface. b. Locating entries and fenestration in recesses to provide additional shade and shadow on the building faces. c. Use of awnings, canopies, and blade signs to provide additional light/shadow play and visual rhythms. EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE ~ VILLAGE AREA 5. Exterior building finishes should consist of a complementary variety of quality materials, including the following: -exterior plaster in various textures and colors -exposed colored concrete block of split face, fluted, burnished, or sandblasted textures -brick and natural or cultured stone -decorative architectural metals, such as grilles or railings -metal or concrete (not mission) tile roofs -metal or fabric canopies or awnings $ T 0 ~ T EII D O R O ~ GH ~ TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE "VILLAGE' -clear and/or tinted glass (non-reflective) -glazed ceramic or natural porcelain tile accents -slate tile -decorative light fixtures -architectural adcent lighting -limited use of wood trim around glazed openings F. LANDSCAPING Landscaping in the Village will generally be used to complement the building architecture, provide color, scent, shadow and movement, and contribute to the overall comfort and attractiveness of the development. A hieramhy will be established in the plant palette which uses the largest materials in the most open areas, with the scale progressively diminishing as transitions are made to predominantly pedestrian areas. 1. Special themed landscaping will be developed to identify the entrances from the existing public streets to the various parts of the development. a. Repetition of particular colors, leaf forms, or plant groupings. b. Inclusion of architectural landscape elements, such as Iow walls or lamp pests. "THEMED" LANDSCAPING 2. "Street" trees will be chosen for the village area which bring color and shade, but do not litter the sidewalks. These trees will be located in tree wells where they may be underplanted with drought tolerant annuals or perennials. 3. Parking lot trees will be chosen for their wide-spreading canopies, to provide a maximum of shade on the paved areas. 4. Stdp planters a minimum of seven feet wide will be provided at each end of every column of parking spaces, and finger planters will be provided at a minimum of one for every ten spaces. PARKING AREA PLANTING 5. Pedestrian paths and gathering areas should feature a large-scale tree as a focal point, but will be accented with lower plant materials chosen for their durability, color, and scent. In order to protect plantings in heavily traveled areas, the planters may be curbed or raised above grade. Candidates for plant materials include the following: -salvias, achilleas, jasmines, wisteria, crape myrtle, limonium, oenothera, and cape plumbago EXHIBIT 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~ D O~3-0261 79 S°uth~cc PDO Ordinance.doc 14 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No: PA99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay) Project Description: A Planned Development Overlay District to include 32.6 acres within the Professional Office (PO) zone and General Plan Amendment located on the south side of State Highway 79 South, west of Avenida De Missions and east of Jedediah Smith Road Assessor's Parcel No: 909-290-058 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division Ihe check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of such failure of to satisfy this condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any..of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting-from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the lans use approval without further notice to the applicant. R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 15 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan and text to include a public multi-purpose trail along Temecula Creek. This approval shall have no force or effect until such time as the General Plan Amendment has been approved by the City Council, modifying the Circulation Element Map. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name R:~P D O~.g9-026t 79 Seuth~CC PDO Ordinanna.doc t6 EXHIBIT 3 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 R:~P D O~9-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.doc 17 Mitigation Monitoring Program Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay District No. 4) Planning Application No. 99-0371 (General Plan Amendment) TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC General Impact: To ensure that any future traffic impacts originating from this site are equal to or less than the number of average daily trips identified in the traffic study for the General Plan. Mitigation Measure: Submit a traffic study with the first subsequent Planning Application. Specific Process: Submit a comprehensive traffic study with the first sqbsequent Planning Application to determine the maximum number of residential units and commercial square footage that can be constructed on the site. The assumptions and results of the study shall be approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments prior to any completeness determinations. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the being determined complete and being scheduled for any public hearing. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitor: The removal of an east/west connector road between Avenida de Missions and Jedediah Smith. An access shall be provided that is publicly accessible that will provide an eastJwest connection between Avenida de Missions and Jedediah Smith Road. Incorporate a public travel way east/west connection between Avenida de Missions and the intersection of Jedediah Smith Road with Highway 79 - South. Prior to the approval of any subsequent Planning Applications on this site. Planning Department R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~lit Mont'g Prog.d~x~ 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES General Impact: Adverse change in the significance of a historical or archaeological resource Mitigation Measure: Identify, recover, preserve and document resources of historical and archaeological significance Specific Process: Condition the project upon the requirement that if any cultural resources or human remains are exposed dudng grading, ground disturbance activities in the vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately and the City shall be contacted and a qualified archaeologist shall be brought to the site to evaluate the resource. If discovered resources merit long-term consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report these resources. Mitigation Milestone:Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during all grading operations Responsible Monitor: Planning Department and Department of Public Works R:~P D O~99-0261 79 SouthtMit Mont'g Prog.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-.~_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPUCATION 99-037t) WHEREAS, LandGrant Development filed Planning Application No. PA99-0371 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on July 19, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matte~, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to the Application on September 26, 2000, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the Application; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. Via Rio Temecula, west of Avenda de Missiones is hereby removed from the Circulation Element Map of the General Plan for the City of Temecula. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures that are attached to Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Applications 99-0261 and 99-0371 that have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~G P A\PA99-0371\CC Resolu~on.doc 1 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of September, 2000. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor A'I-I'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular, meeting thereof held on the day of ,199_, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\G P A\PA99-O371\CC Resolution.doe 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS R:\P D 0\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AN ORDINACE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 9614)104)06, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0261)" WHEREAS, the Applicant filed Planning Application No. 99-0261, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 99-0261 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. 99-0261 on June 21, 2000, at a duty noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended conditional approval of Planning Application No. 99-0261 to the City Council subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. 99-0261 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section t. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Oveday) hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposal, as conditioned, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (PO) Professional Office and Specific Plan Overlay Area 7-3 of the City General Plan. B. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of residential and commercial development proposed. C. The proposed Planned Development Overlay Zoning District is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the project will not approve any specific on-the-ground development and future development requests will require additional and appropriate review. R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~PC Staff Report.doc 7 Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An environmental initial study has been prepared for Planning Application No. 99-0261 in accordance with California Environmental QualityAct. As a result, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission make recommendation to the City Council adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Planning Application (PA99-0261). Section 4. Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Ordinance for Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay), substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21th day of June 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21 th day of June, 2000, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 3 NOES: 2 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, WEBSTER, GUERRIERO TELESIO, MATHEWSON NONE NONE Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~P D OLq9-0261 79 South~C Staff Rep~t.d(x: 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RiO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0371) WHEREAS, LandGrant Development filed Planning Application No. PA99-0371 (the 'Application'), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was pmcassed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on July t9, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as preschbed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. _The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the Application, makes the following findings: ^. The proposed amendment to the Circulation Element Map would not adversely impact areawide traffic circulation; B. The proposed amendment to the Circulation Element Map would not be contrary to the goals and policies contained in the adopted Circulation Element of the General Plar~; and, C2- - Th~-prop0~e*d'ame~-dmdnt-tothe Circulation Element Map would not be inconsistent with the other Elements of the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project would not create any significant impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.: Section 4. Recommendation. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Application to amend the adopted Circulation Element Map by removing Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missions from the Plan. R:~G P A~PA99-0371~taffrpt.pc.doc 4 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19= day of July, 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted~ by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19? day of July, 2000 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: MATHEVVSON, TELESIO, VVEBSTER 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: CHINIAEFF 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GUERRIERO Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\G P A~PA99-O371'~taffr~.pc.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED JUNE 21, 2000 R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC S~aff Report2.doc 6 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CiTY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 21,2000 Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay)- TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE Prepared by: Denice Thomas, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AN ORDINACE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-0i0-006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0261)" APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Chris Smith, Old Vail partners/LandGrant Development PROPOSAL: To adopt a Planned Development Overlay district to develop 32.6 vacant acres within the professional Office zone with 20 acres of residential and 12.6 acres of commercial. LOCATION: Generally located on the south side of State Highway 79 South east of Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Office (PO) Z3 Specific Plan Overlay District EXISTING ZONING: Professional Office (PO) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Professional Office (PO) South: Open Space (OS) East: Low Medium Density Residential (LM) West: Highway Tourist Commercial (HT) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant R:~P O O~99-0261 79 South~PC Staff Relx~t.doc 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Temecula Creek East: Residential West: Vacant BACKGROUND The owner of this property has been in contact with the City regarding this proposal since February 25, 1999. The formal application for this project was filed on June 30, 1999 and was deemed incomplete on July 7, 1999. An August 5, 1999 meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the project in detail. On August 9, 1999 a detailed letter was provided to the applicant, which enumerated the Planning Department's concams. The applicant revised the proposal and submitted a revised list of uses for staff review. On September 29, 1999 staff provided the applicant with comments on the review. On November 29, 1999 the law offices of Greenberg & Bass submitted a letter to the City advising that the applicant has filed for relief under the Bankruptcy Code. Although bankruptcy was filed, review of this project was continued at the request of the applicant. On February 17, 2000, the applicant made a revised submittal that incorporated comments from previous meetings and correspondence. On March 9, 2000, after many revisions, a Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting was held. On March 23, 2000 a follow-up DRC letter was forwarded to the applicant deeming the project incomplete again. The applicant made the modifications suggested by staff, revised the proposal and resubmitted. The project was deemed complete on May 12, 2000 and scheduled for the next available hearing date, which was June 21, 2000. The Development Code contains previsions for Planned Development Overlay districts in Chapter 17.22. The Code provides a process for the creation of mixtures of uses in smaller areas where a specific plan or village center overlay is not appropriate. The applicant is proposing a Planned Development Oveday distdct (PDO), entitled Temecula Creek Village, with a mixture of residential and commercial uses for 32.6 vacant acres. Specifically, the project proposes 20 acres of residential uses and 12.6 acres of commercial uses. This proposal, if approved by the City Council, would adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, add Section 17.22.130 through 17.22.138 to the Development Code, and amend the Zoning Map. Enclosed in your packets, for your review, is a draft of the proposed ordinance, the environmental initial study, and a booklet that includes more detail regarding the project. The intent of this staff report is to analyze the affects of changing the land use from Professional Office to the mixed uses delineated in the PDO, and to make a recommendation as to its appropriateness. ANALYSIS Site Design Access The project is located on the south side of State Highway 79 south, east of Jedediah Smith Road and west of Avenida De Missions. Access to the site is provided through the use of one centrally located main access near the Village area, two public access points (one from Highway 79 south and one from Jedediah Smith Road), a fire access from SR-19, and one access from Avenida de Missions. Entry to the residential areas will be restricted to four gated access points that will be accessible to the residents of this gated project. R:~P D O'~99-O261 79 Sout~PC Staff Repo~.doc 2 Uses Existing Use Designations The existing zoning and the General Plan designation for the property is Professional Office, which is intended to encourage Iow-rise office development situated in a garden arrangement. Typical uses in this zone include legal offices, medical offices and limited support convenience retail and personal service commercial businesses. Additionally, the General Plan designated this property as a Specific Plan Overlay Area. The intent of the Specific Plan Oveday Area is to require a coordinated, comprehensive planning approach for specified areas of the City. The property in question is designated as a Z3 Specific Plan Oveday Area. The General Plan envisioned that the land uses in the Z3 future specific plan area would include a mixture of uses including office, support commercial, residential, services, as well as recreational and open space uses. The applicant is proposing a mixture of support commercial, village commercial and residential uses for this site. The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the General Plan. Proposed Use Designations The project would create a neighborhood with integrated commercial uses to meet the daily needs of its residents. The proposed Planned Development Overlay District text would add detailed land use matrix, development standards, and supplemental design guidelines to Chapter 17.22. The proposal is consistent with the Development Code requirements for Planned Development Overlay Districts. Project Design The project site is situated along the north side of Temecula Creek west of Jedediah Smith Road and east of Avenida De Missions. The proposed Planning Areas from west to east are as follows: 5.6 acres of retail/support commercial, 9 acres of multi-family residential uses, 7 acres of village uses, and 11 additional acres of multi-family residential uses. The proposed residential density range is 16 to 20 units per acre Retail/Support Commercial -This area of the PDO allows for views to the creek while providing the tenant with visual opportunities from Highway 79 South. The land use concept for this area is a combination of Neighborhood and Community Commercial Zones. This area will also provide a transition between the Highway Tourist Commercial area located to the west and the multiple family areas Multi-Family Residential - The clustered medium density residential development will surround the Village component of the project~ The suggested density for the project is between 16 and 20 units per acre. The Floor Area Ratio for this planning area is proposed to be 0.45 with a maximum allowable height of 30 feet. The applicant is opting to rely on the City's Development Code for calculation of the private outdoor open space requirements and the parking requirements for the residential component of the project. The proposed outdoor amenities in these areas include a clubhouse, pools, spas, bar-b-ques, and play lots. The residential area will be within walking distance of the Village commercial area. Village - This component of the project is the heart of this PDOs design. The Village area is accessed from the main entry via a boulevard style entrance from Highway 79 South. This area is intended to serve as the gateway to the project. The applicant is proposing outdoor gathering places complete with benches, trash receptacles, pedestrian walkways, and bike paths. The R:~P D O~9-0261 79 South~PC Staff Rqxxt.doc 3 pa~king standards for this area will be based on the Development Code. The applicant is also proposing a list of landscape materials. While this information is helpful in an advisory sense; staff is recommending that the final landscape palette be determined when a detailed development plan is submitted and the proposed plant materials are reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect for suitability. Signage As with other elements of the project that are not specifically delineated, signage for this project will be coordinated with the applicable existing City Sign Ordinance and the guidelines provided in the proposed PDO. The review of signage will be conducted as the development plans are submitted for review. Other Design Consideration Staff has identified an additional item that should be added to the project. This item is a community accessible hiking/biking trail adjacent to Temecula Creek. This would connect with other citywide craekside trails and would allow non-motorized community access to the Village commercial area. The trail would be an amenity to area residents and businesses, as well as an amenity for those residing in the multi-family component of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study has been prepared for this project and accompanies this staff report. The project being reviewed with this Initial Study is for the Zone Change and future General Plan Amendment. Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the City Council. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan uses of Professional Office with a Specific Plan Overlay. This project site is described as future Specific Plan Area 7.3. The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the future specific plan provisions in the General Plan. The General Plan states that the vision for this area is to Uachieve a comprehensively planned mixed-use development with compatible/ complementary mixtures of office, support commercial, residential and sen/ices.' Staff believes that this project satisfies these requirements. However, there is also a potential conflict with the General Plan. The Circulation Element Map --currentlydepicts a-road, labeled-Via Rio-Temecula, as traversing the southern portion of the site from east to west. The applicant is also proposing the deletion of this proposed road from the General Plan. The applicant filed an application, PA99-0371, for a General Plan Amendment on September 15, 1999. The applicant has submitted a traffic study, which was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. Additionally, the applicant has met with the Public Works Department regarding the potential impacts to circulation if the road is removed. The Public Works Department has indicated that theywould be supportive of the proposal to delete the road. Furthermore, according to the General Plan traffic study, this segment of Via Rio Temecula would be expected to carry see less than 2,000 trips per day. Given the minor traffic volumes carded by this segment of Via Rio Temecula, staff is not anticipating any futura problems from this proposal. This item will be presented for the Commission's consideration next month. Staff is anticipating that both proposals will be submitted simultaneously to the City Council for final consideration. R:~P D olq9-0261 79 South~PC Staff Repot.doc 4 SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Staff supports this innovative design with the addition of the community and resident bicycle trail/pedestrian path. The proposed Planned Development Overlay meets the requirements of the Development Code and is consistent with most of the General Plan. The remaining General Plan issue will be brought forward for the Commission's formal consideration later next month. To ensure consistency with the General Plan, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve the project with the condition that a General Plan Amendment, approving the removal of this segment of Via Rio Temecula, be adopted prior to the Planned Development Overlay becoming effective. FINDINGS The proposed Planned Development Oveday district and the General Plan Amendment are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. The project will provide neighborhood and support services for the existing residential development, as well as, providing a transition between the existing highway tourist commercial zone and the existing resident!al development to the east of the project. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Proposed Ordinance - Blue Page 9 Exhibit 1 - Planned Development Overlay - Blue Page 11 Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 24 Exhibits - Blue Page 27 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map Initial Study- Blue Page 30 R:~P D O~9-0261 79 South~°C Staff Repot.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JUNE 21, 2000 R:\P D O\994)26i 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 7 PlanCom~minutes/OS2100 Ms. Miller, Commissioner Webster, echoed b~ environmental issues associated with this particular reded. Comm Development project go forward. staff's interpretation the Commissioner Fahey utilized as an example, an project and could be and relayed that she would Commissioner Commission comments, noting that with res ,e his desire for additional to incorporate s~l[ar features; and relayed his support of the projecL ~ Chairman Ouerri~,~, his support of the project. ~ MOTION: C~missioner Fahey moved to approve staff's recommg~Lation with the ~~>'~ndifion Nos. 15c (regarding a reduction of wall signage), ancPS~,,(regarding compli~ce with the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation D~ct), as oufl~,~d in the supplemental agenda material. The motion was second'e~,~by ..~mmissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. ~ It was noted that at 6:44 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 6:50 P.M. 6 Planning Application No. 99-0261 - Planned Development Overlay - TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE (located on the south side of State Route 79 (south) east of Jedediah Smith Road. Associate Planner Denice Thomas RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010- 006, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0261)" PlanComm/minutes/O$2100 Via overhead maps, Associate Planner Thomas provided an overview of the project (per agenda material), highlighting the location of the site, and the impacts of the land-use changes; specified the zoning encompassed in the Planned Development Overlay (PDO); with respect to the circulation, noted that the applicant was proposing to delete the proposed Via Rio Temecula read that would traverse the site; relayed that the General Plan amendment had not been approved at this time, advising that the Planning Application No. was PA99-0371 and was submitted on September 5, 1999, noting that the applicant had been in communication with the Public Works department; relayed that the applicant was proposing an ordinance which would include Design Guidelines which would ultimately be adopted into the Development Code; relayed that the initial study reviewed solely the land use changes; and noted that when specific projects were proposed, that specific environmental impacts would be reviewed. In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding the deletion of Via Rio Temecula, Senior Algeria relayed that staff had reviewed the alignment of this road and the parcel map to the south of this project, providing additional information. Senior Planner Hogan noted that when the General Plan was originally prepared the circulation map this particular road was not precisely located, relaying that it was a conceptual read intended to link with the existing roadway south of the homes located to the east and ultimately to link with Jedediah Smith Road; advised that the preliminary traffic analysis revealed that this read would have limited trips and hence the Planning and Public Work Departments would be recommending approval of this amendment when it was presented before the Planning Commission; and for Commissioner Webster, advised that staff had no knowledge with respect to a proposed timeframe for creek improvements, or if the creek would be improved in this area. For Commissioner Telesio, Senior Planner Hogan clarified the conceptual location of Via Rio Temecula, confirming that there was no project between this proposal and the creek. In response to Commissioner Webster, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that dudng the circulation update process there had been an additional creek crossing added from the vicinity of this area across Temecula Creek, noting that the exact location had not been identified and was not a part of the current circulation element. For Commissioner Mathewson, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that if there were concerns regarding Design Guidelines that those comments should be expressed at this time, advising that the proposal, if approved, would become the zoning and the standards for the property unless the Commission opted to not proceed as proposed, and to add language that allows for future changes or flexibility. With respect to the parking requirements (referencing page 3, paragraph C), Commissioner Mathewson relayed concern regarding the adequacy of the parking requirements, noting the potential for restaurant uses of this site; and requested that this language be stricken from the Design Guidelines and be developed at the time specific developments are presented. Additional discussion ensued regarding the anticipated trip generation (ATG). Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the initial study was solely based on the zoning, noting that when the development plans were presented there would be a detailed traffic and biological analysis. PlanComm/minutes/062100 Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the ATG's would be corrected prior to this data going forward to the City Council. For the record, Chairman Guerriero, and Commissioner Webster relayed that they had met with the applicant and the applicant's representatives. Mr. Chris Smith, representing the applicant, provided a history of their development in the Temecula area; presented a project history since the late 1980°s inclusive of past proposals and litigation, noting that for the past year-and-a-half the applicant had been working with the City with respect to a site plan which culminated into this particular proposed project; and for Commissioner Mathewson, reiterated that the project would generate more than 2,000 trips a day. Mr. Timothy Jay Miller, attorney representing the applicant, provided additional information regarding the proposal, referencing the General Plan; and relayed further specification regarding the Z3 zoning designation. Mr. Daniel Gehman, representing the applicant, addressed the Design Guidelines developed for this specific proposal; relayed that access to the uses which would most likely be frequented often would not require a vehicular trip away from the site; specified the proposed village area, the retail/support services area, and a series of pedestrian/bicycle paths which would link the various functions of the site together, and for Commissioner Mathewson, relayed that with respect to the pedestrian path along the creek, various concepts for access from this area to the residential area, noting that the specific route had not been identified. With respect to the area along the creek, Associate Planner Thomas advised that staff would recommend that the path be accessible to the public. In response, Mr. Gehman relayed the applicant's agreement with the recommendation. Mr. John Lynn, 32237 Placer Belair, relayed for the record that this proposal was not consistent with the City's approved Growth Management Plan; referencing the policy, noted that General Plan amendments and changes of zones should be denied within the City that result in increased traffic levels du#ng the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RClP) Planning process; and relayed the following additional language: analyze the circulation system impacts as they relate to proposed land-use changes along the 79 South/Winchester. corddor-and the- 79-South:Corddor. Traffic.modeling shaft be performed for any Ch-a-ng~s ~parf of the Ri~/&iside C-~uhty Integrated Plan (RClP) process. The cities shall ve#fy the results of the modeling; and advised that this project had not been adequately modeled or verified. For Mr. Lynn, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that this proposal did not currently have a density range attached to the residential area, noting that staff was of the opinion that with the proposed mixed uses, this project would be effective in keeping vehicles off the streets and providing areas where people could live and walk to services, advising that the proposal was consistent with the General Plan, clarifying staff's support of the project; and noted that Mr. Lynn raised a good point with respect to the Growth Management Action Plan. PlanC om~TL/minutes/062100 In response, Mr. Lynn reiterated that the proposed project encompassed a change of zone; and queried whether the City's General Plan would be changed to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. In response, Planning Manager Ubnoske confirmed that the General Plan would be amended, noting that elements of the Growth Management Action Plan would be taken into account. Ms. Albia Miller (relaying at this point in the meeting that she was a resident of Wildomar) noted her concern with additional development, specifically with respect to traffic impacts; and noted her recommendation for the City to focus on environmental issues. Mr. Smith urged the Commission to consider an equitable decision with respect to the landowner, noting the current tax cost of $200,000-250,000 per year that the applicant had paid for the infrastructure in this area; and advised that the village concept would be successful at this particular location. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's queries, for clarification, Senior Planner Rockholt relayed that based on the General Plan's analysis, there would be 480 AD'Ps per acre, noting that there were 32 acres which would encompass approximately 13,000 ADT's, relaying that the traffic analysis data for this specific proposal had denoted 11,400 trips per day. The commission relayed its conclusions, as follows: - Commissioner Fahey relayed concern with respect to clarification in the staff report regarding the traffic impacts, recommending that the Commission not move forward with this project until the matter had been clarified, and until there was additional specificity with respect to how this project corresponds with the Growth Management Plan adopted by the City Council; advised that if the traffic thresholds were lower than what was originally planned for this area, then the Growth Management Plan Guidelines would be met; and recommended continuing the matter. In concurrence with Commissioner Fahey, Commission Mathewson recommended continuing the matter; relayed his concern with respect to the Design Guidelines, the consistency with the Growth Management Plan, and the proposed zone change to allow for high density residential; in light of the fact of the pending housing element update which would be presented to the Commission at a future date, noted that he was not in a position to approve an additional multi-family:area without a good basis of what the updated housing element would reveal in terms of policies and guidelines; relayed that at this point he would be uncomfortable approving any project that encompassed a multi- family residential area; and noted that while he was a strong supporter of the village concept, it would be his desire to have the housing element data pdor to moving forward with this proposal. Commissioner Telesio relayed that he shared a level of discomfort with the unknown factors, noting that he would like to see a draft copy of the housing element in order to review the density issues; advised that he favored the village concept; and relayed that he would be reluctant to approve the project until the previously-mentioned issues were addressed. plimcomnVminutes/0$2100 Commissioner Webster relayed that this project was completely in conformance with the General Plan, noted that the proposed mixture of uses would be appropriate for this location; with respect to the Growth Management Policy, which was prepared by the City Council without input form the Planning Commission or any of the City's Commissions, noted that it was in direct conflict with the City's goals and elements in the General Plan; advised that there was an existing Growth Management Element within the General Plan that had specified standards, noting that the City had not followed through with the guidelines; reiterated that this project was in conformance with the General Plan, reiterating that the Growth Management Policy was not; advised that with respect to future development approvals within this project site the crucial issues would be the schedule of permitted uses and the Design Guidelines; relayed that the Design Guidelines should be more specific, recommending minor enhancements to the Design Guidelines, specifically with respect to the multi-family residential area; noted the extreme shortage of high density affordable housing; advised that to ensure an effective village center, there would need to be a higher core of residential surrounding the village center; with respect to the layout of the multi-family residential area, recommended modifications with respect to the perimeter parking, recommending more of a garden- style apartment complex; with respect to the far west end of the property in the retail/support commercial area, recommended that this area comply with the Neighbonhood Center Guidelines within the City's Design Guidelines; and recommended moving forward with this project with the modified Design Guidelines. Chairman Guerriero relayed that he, too, was in favor of the village concept; advised that due to the lack of employment in this area, ultimately the residents residing at this location would be driving in order to commute to work; relayed that he had discussed with the applicant his concern regarding the multi-family density area while acknowledging the lack of affordable housing in Temecula; noted that his primary concerns were the traffic flows on Highway 79, and the high density areas and its impact upon the schools; relayed that in his opinion the Growth Management Plan was designed for large-scale developments (i.e., Wolf Creek); and noted that he concurred with Commissioner Webster in moving forward with the project with modifications with respect to the density range and with respect to the traffic impacts. For clarification, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the traffic study did show a reduction in the generation of traffic trips based on the zoning change by approximately 1500 trips a day; with respect to the housing element update, advised that she did not foresee any negative impacts with the State regarding adding additional multi-family areas; ~and:advised that it would be 30-60 days before the draft form of the element would be presented to the Commission. Commissioner Fahey relayed that while this project was an appropriate development for this area, that it was vital that the staff report was accurate; recommended that the Growth Management Plan be addressed; concurred with revising the Design Guidelines; and recommended continuing this matter to address these issues. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to continue this item to the July 19, 2000 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson. (Ultimately this motion was amended.) planComn~minutes/062100 Mr. Smith respectfully requested the Commission to vote for or against the proposal, noting his opposition with respect to the continuance; and relayed that the applicant's traffic engineer was available for questions. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to deny the project, as proposed. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and roll call vote reflected denial of the motion, as follows: 2/3/0/0 AYES: Commissioners: Mathewson, and Telesio. NOES: Commissioners: Fahey, Guerfiero, and Webster. ABSENT: Commissioners: None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the project and that the Commission provide specific guidelines with respect to the Design Guidelines being modified, that specific data be relayed to the City Council with respect to the traffic study, and that there be clarification with respect to the Growth Management Plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster. (Ultimately this motion was withdrawn.) Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested that the Commission's comments could be e- mailed to staff in order to ensure that all concerns were relayed in the staff report pdor to the item being presented to the City Council. Commissioner Webster recommended that the revisions be specified at this time in order for the applicant to comment. Commissioner Telesio relayed that his cencem was respect to the high density, the traffic impacts, and the relationship between the proposal and the Growth Management Plan. In response to Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Smith reiterated staffs comments that the project would decrease the trip generation by 1500 tdps a day. Planning Manager Ubnoske ciadfied that the proposal was for a PDO which staff would be reluctant to move forward on with the project without the establishment of Design Guidelines. Commissioner.Webster_recemmended that the City~sDesign Guidelines be adopted With this'P~oject, with the understanding that as specific projects proceed through the development process, additional detail would be investigated. Commissioner Fahey commented regarding development projects coming before the Planning Commission, relaying that there would be an opportunity to apply the Growth Management Policy standards at that time. Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed her concern with respect to the PDO being adopted with the City's Design Guidelines, requesting that height and setback standards be established. At this time, Commissioner Fahey withdrew her previous motion. 10 MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the project with the following modifications: to adopt the Village Guidelines setforth in the applicant's proposal and to reference the City's Design Guidelines for the multi-family residential, retail, and commercial areas. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) Commissioner Mathewson relayed that due to the issues that have not been addressed, he could not support the project at this time. Commissioner Telesio noted that he could support the continuance; and relayed that it was the applicant's desire that the Commission vote to either approve or deny this project, opting not to have the item continued. For Commissioner Fahey, Attorney Diaz confirmed that the Commission could move' to continue the matter, if that was the desire. At this time roll call vote was taken reflecting approval of the motion, as follows: 3/2/0/0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Fahey, Guerriero, and Webster. Mathewson, and Telesio. None. None. 'C~OM MISSIONER REPORTS A. '~mm ssioner Fahey relayed that for future redesign projects, staff may vis~['q Bemardo site that had been recently redesigned, commend strip 's new appearance; and specified that the site was , Road and Rancho Bemardo. the Commission a Planning Manager Ubnoske vould be made for the expir~ ast the C. With respect to the ~m Mathewson queried whether Power Center had been fully site issues, Commission Margarita Road behind the In response, Chairman Guerrie~ additional information, noting the applicant's ditional in the area. Commissioner Mathe~v~n relayed that he with the visual appearance of the/,,~astic barrier proximate to the g dock that was tom. ~ D. Chaim~Guerriero noted that the roadwor~ on Margarita Road, so~ of Moraga .,~ad s ~t'll not been completed, advising that the area was a traffic haT~ E. J W~ respect to the Promenade housing tract across from the mall site, Chairn~, ~ Guerriero noted the lack of iandsceping on the berm. 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 19, 2000 R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 8 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION July19,2000 Planning Application No. 99-0371 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Prepared By: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-037t) BACKGROUND This General Plan Amendment (GPA) originates from a request by the Old Vail Partners and LandGrant Development for the Temecula Creek Village to remove the General Plan roadway that was intended to cross their property. The application for a General Plan Amendment was submitted to the City on September 15, 1999. ANALYSIS During the development of the General Plan in the early 1990's, Via Rio Temecula was added to the Circulation Element Map between Jedediah Smith and Butterfield State Roads. The purpose of Via Rio Temecula was to provide a parallel roadway to State Route 79 South to create an altemate route in an area of anticipated traffic congestion. The proposed roadway was added to the Circulation Element Map during the public hearing process. As a result, the original General Plan traffic study did not contain Via Rio Temecula. Subsequent analysis by the applicant indicates that this section of the road would carry less that 1,000 vehicle trips on an average day. The City Public Works Department has reviewed the study and concurs with the results. The results of the applicant's traffic study (Exhibits J and K) show future traffic volumes both with and without this segment of Via Rio Temecula. Copies of Exhibits J and K are located in Attachment No. 3. In addition, an analysis of intersection delays at build-out indicate that there will not be a significant impact to Highway 79 South with this segment of Via Rio Temecula removed. The results of this analysis are shown in the following table. R:\G P A~PA99-0371~taffrpt.pc.doc 1 With Via Rio Temecula 26.7 D 21.5 C Without Via Rio Temecula 26.6 D 22.7 C Change -0.1 +1.2 The range for average delays at LOS "D" for signalized intersections is 25.01 to 40.00 seconds. The reduction in the average delay at the intersection with Jedediah Smith Road appears to result from a decrease in the amount of cross traffic resulting from the elimination of Via Rio Temecula. Based upon these results, Staff has determined that the removal of Via Rio Temecula from the General Plan would not have an adverse impact on traffic circulation or the environment. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY Staff has reviewed the General Plan to assess the amendments potential consistency. Only one goal statement appears to be applicable in this situation. Cimulation Element Goal 1 states that the City will strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections. According to the preceding analysis, future traffic service levels at the impacted intersections would meet this goal. As a result, staff has determined that that the removal of this segment of Via Rio Temecula would be consistent with and continue to further the purposes of the adopted City General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the impacts of this project in conjunction with the proposal for Planned Development Overlay No. 4. As a result of this review, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for this General Plan Amendment. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration and the General Plan Amendment removing Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missions and reconnecting it to Highway 79 via Avenida de Missions (Planning Application 99-0371). Attachments: 2. 3. 4. PC Resolution - Blue Page 3 Initial Study - Blue Page 6 Traffic Study Results - Blue Page 7 Exhibits - Blue Page 8 A. Current Circulation Element Map B. Proposed Circulation Element Map R:\G P A'~PA99-0371~staffrpt,pc.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JULY 19, 2000 R:\P D O\99~)261 79 South\CC S~aff Report2.doc 9 ~an Open Space/Conservation Element, Item No. 11 (regarding the Center concept), Commissioner Mathewson noted that he had inter le differently than Commissioner Webster. Senior Management Anal' at this issue could be better addressed at the Joint Workshop. Agenda Item Item required no formal action, the Commission 4. !with 4 ERACIT t Presentation - ,nsible Alcohol Consum Officer Robed Alexander Program Officer Alexander was implemented regarding the rove patrols, the invited the Commissioners to published in the newspaper, relaying obtain the dates for the scheduled DUI additional information regarding the the sting operations that if a over to the ABC, advising that ti majority of arrests .... that alternate cities had si' for driving advised that there newspaper; noted specific area Commissione the winerie were ~rview of the ERAC ram, noting that the program additional information liquor store sting operations; noting that the dates were ;ommissioners could also contact him to for Chairman Guerriero, provided ERACIT program; relayed that during was times the data would be turned license suspended; noted that the ~mmissioner Webster, relayed ~rrests in the City of Temecula ~ with alternate cities; in the there was not a ,r the influence; for )roximate to Officers irams, noting that )1 were about requirement to publish the the Shakespeare's nightclub had proliferation of drivers driving had been advised that at the check for drivers driving under the influence of dru! advised that it appeared to him 3at the uric influence of alcohol in the City of Temecula I t,~[;~ program. driving Since this Agenda Item required no formal action, the Commission moved forward with Agenda Item No. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 5 Planning Application No. 99-0371 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION 99- 037~) Chairman Guerriero advised that he would be abstaining from this issue, and therefore left the dais, Vice Chairman Mathewson presiding. Senior Planner Rockholt presented the staff report (via agenda material), noting that the request for the General Plan Amendment had been made by Old Vail Partners and Land Grant Development to remove a portion of roadway denoted on the General Plan (a segment of Via Rio Temecula); provided additional information regarding the purpose of originally placing the roadway segment on the General Plan; provided additional information regarding the analysis of intersection delays at build-out, indicating that there would not be a significant negative impact if this segment of Via Rio Temecula was removed. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed additional information regarding accidents proximate to this area; and provided the rationale for stafCs recommendation to remove this segment of roadway from the General Plan. Commissioner Telesio recalled that this issue had been discussed when the project was presented; and queried whether there was a signal proposed for the center entrance into the project. In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding the previous plan for Assessment District No. 159 to construct Temecula Creek Improvements further to the west, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that at this point in time the land was being utilized for wetland mitigation, noting that it was controlled by the Resource Agencies, advising that staff did not anticipate any additional improvements in this area to Temecula Creek with the exception of a bridge crossing proximate to this area; and confirmed that there was an open space conservation easement in this area. Commissioner Webster relayed that due to the above-mentioned data this was an additional reason to remove this element from the Circulation Plan. Mr. Chris Smith, representing Land Grant Development, for Commission Telesio, relayed that there was a proposed signal at the entry to the Village area, noting that the determination would ultimately be determined by Caltrans; noted that to the best of his recollection, there were proposed traffic 'signals at Jedediah Smith Road, and Avenida De Missions for a future date when the traffic warranted the installations; with respect to traffic generation, relayed that this particular project would generate less traffic than the Office Professional which was what the area was originally approved for; for Commissioner Chiniaeff, noted that the applicant was proposing an access easement point from Avenida De Missions; relayed that the access points onto Highway 79 would be restricted to right-ins, and right-outs only, with the exception of the center access point which would potentially be signalized. Mr. Larry Markham, representing Mr. Ray Schooley (owner of the property east of this project), for Commissioner Webster, provided additional information regarding access issues to Avenida De Missions; and provided additional information regarding the area proximate to the proposed segment of roadway to be removed from the General Plan. For Vice Chairman Mathewson, Mr. Smith relayed that the traffic counts for this project reduced the vehicular trips by ten percent (10%) due to the opportunities to live and work at the site. The Commission relayed the following closing comments: Commissioner Chiniaeff noted his concern which had been raised by Mr. Markham that if this segment of roadway was removed from the General Plan it could additionally remove a condition attached to the map associated with access to Avenida De Missions, advising that his concern was based on ensuring that the residents from Multi-Family Area B could access Avenida De Missions. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the City had conditioned Mr. Schooley's map to provide the right-of-way for that access due to the fact that the property of discussion had been zoned as Office Professional which would be an attractor of traffic; advised that since the this current proposal had been presented with residential units which would not attract traffic, it reduced the need for a circulation element road as a major t_h(~(oughfare, requiring only a minor driveway acc_ess. Commissioner Chiniaeff clarified that his concern was based on removing the segment of roadway from the General Plan since there would be no obligation for the adjacent property owner to provide access over to Avenida De Missions; queried whether the approval of this project had been inclusive of a requirement to provide access to Avenida De Missions via a signalized intersection for exiting the project. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the Schooley map had been conditioned to provide the right-of-way, noting that this map had been conditioned to provide an exit point at that location per a Public Works requirement, and a Fire and Safety requirement. Commissioner Chiniaeff noted his concern if the- property owners could not come to an agreement, and the subsequent inadequate access to the property. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that prior to development on the Schooley map there would need to be development approval, noting that the City --would-still"have the ability to condition the development with respect to the right-of-way area. Commissioner Webster concurred with Commission Chiniaeff's comments regarding ensuring adequate access to the property, recommending that staff address the access issue with future development proposals; and noted that the proposed residential area did have provision of two access points. Commissioner Telesio relayed that he could support the General Plan Amendment. Vice Chairman Mathewson relayed that his concern had been based on access to the proiect from the east, noting that he could support moving forward with the General Plan Amendment. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; and to adopt the proposed resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted n_go and Chairman Guerriero who abstained. )MMISSIONER'S REPORTS With respect to the memorandum regarding the status report on the Center, Commissioner Webster relayed that compared to landscape plan for the parking area, the site did not have the of trees planted, advising that there was a fifty percent (50%'. le required per the Specific Ptan, noting that even at full growth :lid not the landscaping would meet this requirement, specificall to the ring roads since there were no field trees in th ~rea of the Ride requirement, from document to needed to be definition of what the communicate with For C ner Webster, Attorney Curley provided adc information regarding the rk N Ride facility within the mall area that after additional ion it did not appear that there was stated Park N that there was an of language utilized ment; noted that to enforce ation Measure there hat the obligation existed that there was a clear was; advised ,t the City was going to relay t while exact certainty needed to be clarified that this issue uld be address, under the original approvals or in the context of future; due to the I Ride facility being part of the expectations of the approvals; staff's intent to move the issue forward with the developer. Commissioner Telesio queried policy standards for Commission staff was in the process of developing ins. Attorney Curley relayed that was contours of the standards invest jurisdictions; and noted th~ would bring future date. process of preparing the legal other policies in alternate to the Commission at a Director of. Planning relayed that bas ~ssions with Deputy City Manager Thornhill years there had been a City Council/Planning Commission 3p at which time the Council had ed clear direction of support for the :ommunications to the Planning 3ission; and noted that of there consideration for modifying the policy, this would need to be I: Council, as well. Chairma~ continu recommended that if the ex-parte ,s were to the Commissioners disclose the meetings and 3ics of verbally or in written form. Mathewson, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed was a full agenda for the August 1, 2000 Joint City Counc 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:\P D O\994)261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc I0 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Planning Applications No. PA99-0261 & PA99-0371 Planned Development Overlay Area No. 4 (PDO-4) and General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Dan Rockholt, Senior Planner (909) 694-6400 Project Location Generally located on the south side of State Highway 79 east of Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road. Project Sponsor's Name and Address Chris Smith Old Vail Partners/Land Grant Development 12625 High Bluff Drive Ste. 212 San Diego, CA 92130-2054 General Plan Designation "PO" Professional Office, Z3 Specific Plan Overlay Zone Zoning "PO" Professional Office Description of Project The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. This action will adopt the concept for a vision to revitalize the area for mixed-use development known as "Temecula Creek Village." Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The property is surrounded by open space to the south, existing professional offices to the north, Iow-medium residential uses to the east, and highway commercial uses to the west. Other public agencies whose approval None is required Supplemental Information This Initial Environmental Study is being completed to evaluate the proposed change of zone from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay. The mixed land uses proposed within the zone change application have impacts to the area to a lesser degree than those already in place. No detailed information on the future development of this site is available at this time. All future development projects will receive appropriately detailed environmental review when specific details are available. R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261.doc 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Planning Hazards Population and Housing Noise Geology and Soils Public Services Water Utilities and Service Systems Air Quality Aesthetics Transportation/Circulation Cultural Resources Biological Resources Recreation Energy and Mineral Resources Mandatory Findings of Significance V' None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared V' I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by , the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated' impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Dan Rockholt, Senior Planner Printed name and Title Date \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~99-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 2 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: 1.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) zone. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of V~a Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. This action will adopt a concept for a vision to revitalize the area with a mixed-use development known as 'Temecula Creek Village." This proposal will not divide any established communities. Further, the environmental impacts associated with Land Use and Planning are consistent with the impacts considered within the proposed PDO, as well as the adopted City General Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Additionally, a traffic study was performed by a Registered Traffic Engineer, which indicates that the removal of the proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Through existing adopted policies and development guidelines, future development will be subjected to City review as wetl as additional environmental oversight. When specific projects are proposed, land use considerations will be reviewed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified end no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating, the construction of replacament housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: \\TEMEC FS101\VOLI~epts~°LANNING~PDO~9'0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261,doc - 3 2oa The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. This action considers the adoption of the PDO which includes up to 400 multiple- family dwelling units to be considered in future development. Any construction of future dwelling units will be subject to CEQA review. Therefore, as a result, this action will have less than significant impacts to the environment, therefore mitigation measures are not necessary. 2. b,c This action will not displace any number of existing housing units, therefore will not displace any persons from their dwellings. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? :.:. :::::i:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:~- ;?~;;;;;,~ ~ a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?. Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading~ subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have -~oil incepable' of adequately ~upporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: 3.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The project is located within the Alquist Prioilo Special Study Zone for the VVildomar Fault Zone. The General Plan indicates that this area is within Ground Shaking Zone II. Due to the seismic nature of the area, future development could potentially incur moderate to severe ground \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261.doc 4 shaking, resulting in potential risks to public safety and property damage. To minimize the effects of seismic activities, all development is required to adhere to construction standards outlined in the City's Fire and Building Codes. It is important to note that seismic phenomena is not unique to this project, but rather affects the entire southern Califomia region. Proposed grading for the project would not produce any additional geologic hazards nor create any unique geologic features beyond those normal during construction activities. All grading activities will require plan check review and subsequent inspections to ensure compliance to applicable laws/requirements. When specific projects are proposed, seismic and safety issues will be addressed at that time. As a result, either less than significant or no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUAUTY. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a Iowedng of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for . which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: \\TFMEC_FS101~VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .dm; 5 4.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan· The environmental impacts associated with hydrology and water quality are consistent with the impacts considered within the approved General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report. In addition, standard erosion protection measures will be required as part of the approval of future grading plan. When specific projects are proposed, hydrologic factors will be reviewed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 5. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ,~ air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ~ to an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ,,/ chteda pollutant for which the project, region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ,~ concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number V' of people? Comments: 5.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed · extension of.Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the · ....--C~rcul~tio~Plan.;=AII-air-qualitY;'i~l~=~;u'tS caused by future development stem from mobile source emissions. Regionally, future development will have minimal air quality impacts because the scope of development has likely been anticipated in the regional air quality plan. Discharge of temporary construction vehicle activity will only be temporary in nature, and less than significant given the duration of the project. Local and regional climate pattems will not be changed due to the relatively small size of the project. Due to the mixed-use nature of the proposed project, minimal odor and emissions are anticipated. Burning wastes are not permitted for this project. Further, the minor change to the Circulation Element will also have minimal impacts to air discharges. When specific projects are proposed, air quality factors will be reviewed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) ~\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 6 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion i management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting altemative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? Comments: 6.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District and to remove a portion of the proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions to Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Element Map. The applicant has submitted traffic studies for each proposal. The traffic study for the General Plan Amendment evaluated the changes in area traffic volumes with and without the extension of Via Rio Temecula. According to the Study, this segment of Via Rio Temecula is expected to carry approximately 700 vehicle trips during an average day. If this road segment is removed from the General Plan, the traffic would be rerouted onto Avenida de Missions and SR-79 South. The additional 700 average daily thps on Avenida de Missions and SR-79 South would not change the anticipated Levels_of Service for these road segments; which would remain as LOS "D" or better. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated from this General Plan Amendment. The detailed traffic study for the Planned Development Overlay studied potential impacts that may result from future development stemming from this action. This study has been reviewed by Staff, which included a review by the Public Works Department. Staff has concluded that the proposed change to the Circulation Element is consistent with the goals of the approved General Plan and Environmental Impact Report. This conclusion is a result of the comparison of proposed land use changes to existing permitted land uses. Although the proposed project will result in a net increase of daily vehicle trips over the current vacant land, it would not be an increase over the type of land uses already permitted for the property under current zoning requirements. When specific projects are proposed, further circulation impacts will be reviewed at that time, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessa~j. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) ~TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South~INITIAL S'I'UDY PA-99-261.doc 7 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: ~a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either dim(fly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any ripadan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native .. resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: 7.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will ~_require an.a_mend_rne_n~ to_ the General _Plan _Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed -extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De*Missions and-west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The site for the proposed zone change does not lie within any area identified as supporting identified endangered species. Biological impacts due to the any future development's proximity to Temecula Creek may occur. However, because this action does not review actual in-the-ground development. Through existing adopted policies and development guidelines, future development will be subjected to City review as well as additional environmental oversight. VVhen specific projects are proposed, land use considerations affecting biological resources will be reviewed at that time. Additionally, any proposed development will require appropriate biological studies, which in turn may result in the modification of the project. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) \~TEMEC_FS101~VOLl~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~99-0261 79 South~INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 8 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery si{e delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Commen~: 8.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The future development does not incorporate within its design any use of non- renewable materials, nor cause the removal or loss of mineral resources from the area, since none have been identified. When specific projects are proposed, further mineral resource impacts will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of h~Terdous materials? b. Crate a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. _ ~ Emit_ hazard~iJs emissions_or_.handle_ ha~ard, pu_s_.~or~ acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1 ~Depts~P LANNING~DO~9-0261 79 South~INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261.doc 9 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildiands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands? Comments: 9.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a.portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Given that the proposed development is mixed-use in nature, no increase to explosion hazards, toxic chemical release, or increased safety hazards is anticipated. Emergency response plans and those sections of the Temecula General Plan, which address public safety take into consideration the area at built-out conditions. Fire hazards are increased slightly due to the nature of construction, however all development plans are required to be reviewed by the Fire De.p.art.men. t prior to approval. Conditions set forth during this phase of the development process will m~n~m~ze ~mpacts to less than significant levels. When specific projects are proposed, further impacts resulting from hazards and hazardous materials will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary . (Sources: 1, 2, and 3) 10.. NOISE. Would the project result in: _ _~ a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c. ! A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ~\TEMEC_FS101~VOLI~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 10 e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 10.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Increases in noise levels will be minimal, given that the proposed development is mixed-use in nature. No land uses are anticipated that would cause severe increases in ambient noise levels. Some short-term construction noise will occur during future proposed grading activities. When specific projects are proposed, further impacts resulting from hazards and hazardous materials will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. Additionally, future development will require appropriate noise studies, which in turn may require noise mitigation measures at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 11. PUBUC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new Or altered Govemment services in any of the following areas: a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associates with the provision or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fire protection? ~c. __ Police protection? d. Schools? e. Parks? f. Other public facilities? Comments: 11.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. No increases to existing governmental, public facilities or services shall result from this action. It can be anticipated that impacts to public facilities and services will \\TEMEC_FS101~VOLl~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~99-0261 79 South~lNITIAL STUDY PA-99-261.doc 11 occur. However, it is anticipated that the resulting impacts would be minimal and comparable to developments already permitted under existing ordinances and guidelines. When specific projects are proposed, impacts to public services and facilities will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 12.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. Increases to demands for public utilities are anticipated, given that future development will be mixed-use in nature. Mixed-use developments typically have demands to services such as electrical utilities, telecommunications infrastructures, sewer and water distribution, etc. However, these levels are not anticipated to cause severe demands that would hamper other land uses in the area. Local utility infrastructures are constructed and ara being improved to handle increased demands caused by local development When specific projects are proposed, impacts to utilities and service_systems will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. As a rasuit, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) \~TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South~INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 12 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a. Have a _~L, bstnntial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, reck outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Commen~: 13.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. When specific projects are proposed, impacts to public services and facilities will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time. Additionally, the City has adopted design guidelines within the development process, which requires development to meet certain design and aesthetic standards. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. ; Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of I a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.57 b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57 c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological .... resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Commen~: 14.all The proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The General Plan EIR diagram of Areas of Sensitivity for Archaeological Resources (Figure 5-6) does identify the property as a potential sensitive \~TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South~INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261.doc 13 archaeologiCal site, although the text of the General Plan EIR recognizes that the survey leading the identification of sensitive sites may not accurately portray all cultural resources in the study area. However, much of this site has been previously disturbed. This disturbance further reduces the likelihood of finding any cultural resources. Further, no burial locations have been identified on site, however more detailed analysis may be necessary to determine potential impacts. Mitigation Measures are identified below. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) Mitigation Measure 14.all Because the area of the proposed project has been identified as one with potential sensitive archeological resources, any future developments within the area will require detailed study and analysis. All new development will comply with AB 3180 ("Mitigation Monitoring Program") and report to the City on the completion of mitigation and resource protection measures required for each project. Further, future development will be required to comply with the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Guidelines in regards to the preservation or salvage of significant archaeological and paleontological sites discovered during construction activities. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physiCal deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Commente: 15.a11: The propos;~rojec~'~is*_an~0r~ {o rezone an area of approxin:~ately-33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. When specific projects are proposed, impacts to utilities and service systems will be reviewed, and any required mitigation measures will be imposed at that time.. These may include, but are not limited to impact fees, incorporation of recreation elements within the development, etc. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) \\TEMEC_FS101~VOLl~epts~PLANNING~mDO~=9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .d(:¢ 14 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restdct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (uCumulatively considerable= means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will; cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: 16.a ~he proposed project is an action to rezone an area of approximately 33 acres from Professional Office (PO) to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed plan will require an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element removing a portion of a proposed extension of Via Rio Temecula, from Avenida De Missions and west of Jedediah Smith Road from the Circulation Plan. The PDO is intended to prepare for future development that is consistent with the approved General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 16.b: The cumulative impacts from the project ara considered less than significant because the site is proposed to be developed in a manner consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. All cumulative impacts from the land use and development scheme envisioned in the General Plans have been analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. Given the project's consistency with 'these~cud~ents, *cumulative. impacts~ must be considered as less than significant. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 16.c: No environmental impacts have been identified that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. (Source: 1, 2 and 3) 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. I Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~99-0261 79 South\INITIAL S'[UDY PA-99-261.doc 15 Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the eadier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. Commen~: 17.a: The City of Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report, copies of which are available at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Additionally, the Temecula Creek Traffic Impact Analysis, February 2000, copies of which are available at the City of Temecula Planning Department. 17.b: Cumulative impacts from ail of the issues discussed above were addressed and mitigated to one degree or another in the General Plan, Specific Plan and respective EIR's. 17.c: Mitigation measures associated with the present project and analysis have been previously described and the measures will be implemented as part of the grading permit approval, issuance, or monitoring processes. SOURCES 2. 3. 4. 5. City of Temecula General Plan City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report City of Temecula Development Code Temecula Creek Traffic impact Analysis, February 2000 Via Rio Temecula Road General Plan Link Deletion Study, September, 1999 \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~Depts~PLANNING~PDO~9-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261 .doc 16 Errata Sheet: 1. Section 6 all: "The existing zoning on the project would allow for development that could produce 10,755 average daily trips (ADT); whereas the proposed change of zone could produce projects that would generate 10,260 average daily trips (ADT). The proposed project will produce 495 fewer trips than projects development under the existing zoning." R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\INITIAL STUDY PA-99-261.doc 17 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc EXHIBIT A LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT DATED JULY 20, 2000 R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Report2.doc 12 July 18, 2000 Mr. Chip Swanson Vice President LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT 12625 High Bluff Ddve, Suite 212 San Diego, CA 92130 Subject: Temecula Creek High Intensity Office Development Scenario Dear Mr. Swanson: The purpose of this letter is to compare the vehicle tdp generation associated with the current mixed use development concept for Temecula Creek to the estimated trip generation from an office development scenario. The mixed use development concept was analyzed by RKJK in the February 29, 2000 Traffic Impact Analysis report prepared for the Temecula Creek project. The mixed use project is assumed to be developed with 400 apartment dwelling units, 30,000 square feet of office and a total of 93,000 square feet of commercial retail. The amount of commercial retail represents a "worse case" assumption in terms of development within the village area of the project. IThe: office alternative is based upon a floor area ratio for office and professional uses of ~g the intensity bonus provision..[The approximately 32.7 acre project site is therefore ~ ~'~ ~ ~ 1,424,412 square feet of building area. This would require a combination of surface and subterranean parking areas.. We anticipate that there would be some support retail uses incorporated into the project. 'Allowable uses would include restaurant/deli, drug store, dry cleaner, bank, hair salon, daycare, copies, florist or other compatible uses. We anticipate that approximately 5% of the GLA (71,221 s.f.) would be used for support retail uses. Trip generation data for both the mixed use project and office alternative are presented on the attached Table 1. The mixed use project exhibits lower inbound and outbound traffic flows in comparison to the high intensity office alternative during both the morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the mixed use project generates less overall activity throughout the day. .:.. ........... JUl.. ~ 6 Z000 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING · GIS ° TRAFFIC/ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING 1601 Dove Street, Suite 290 ° Newport Beach, CA 92660 · Phone: (949) 474-0809 · Fax: (949) 474-0902 Mr. Chip Swanson Vice President LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT July 18, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this trip comparison, or require additional information, please don't hesitate to give me a call at (949) 474-0809 Ext. 204. Sincerely, RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pd ci~l JKsjf/11142 JN:1226-00-01 Attachment TABLE 1 MIXED USE TRIP GENERATION LAND USE QUANTITY UNITS~ 40(; DU 30.0 TSF Retail 61.0 TSF 32.0 TSF PEAK HOUR AM PM INOUT IN OUT 73 218 239~ 531 -24 199' DAILY 2,636 527 235 4,961 154 3,276 563 11,400 10,260 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ALTERNATIVE TRIP GENERATION PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON LAND USE lixed Use ~ )ro~ional Office Alternative DIFFERENCE . PEAK HOUR AM I PM IN OUT IN OUT___ 1'~-~"~-~215 478 507 1,389 229 512 1,586 DALLY 9,813 5,480 DALLY I DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet J:~obs\12260001~-rGCOMP.xls]T 1 EXHIBIT B LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT DATED AUGUST 3, 2000 R:\P D O\994)261 79 South\CC Staff Reporl2.doc RKJK & ASSOCIATES INC. 'Mr. Chip Swanson V'me Pre~lem LAND CdaaM~l' DEVELOPMENT 12i~25 High Bluff Dflve, guile 212 Subject: Temecula Creek Office Development Soenario Dear Mr. Swa~en: genemtk~n from an olfice deveJopment scenario. The ~ use c eveiapmant concept was analyzed by RKJK in the February 29, 2000 Traffic impact At. lyes mixer prepared for ~e Temecula Creek pmjecL The ~ use project is assuned to be developed · v.~th 400 apa~me~ dwelling unils, 30.000 square feet af of~e a'~d a ~ af g3.e00 square fee[ a~ ~ remL The ~ a~ commercial retail represents a 'worse *with 7~ buildb'lg a~ This' would require a co'nbination of surface and subterranean parking areas. We ant~:~ate lhat there would tx: some support relait uses incoqx~aled into lhe project. ,Mowable uses would include restaurant/deft, drug store, d~, dearer, bank, hair salon, daycare, copies, florist or o~her compatible uses. We anlJcipale that appmxirnatoly 9% ofthe GLA (65.341 5.f.) would be used for sijppo~t Trip geneautla~ data for Ix)Ih ~e _m~._~l_ use projed and office alten~tive are presented on the ~ Table 1. The mixed use project exhibils lower intound and outhound traffic flOWS in compariso~ lo lhe office ~_ll:.~.,~nalive during both the n~oming and evening peak houls. In addition, the mixed use project generates less overall activity throughout 'I'RANSPORTATION PLANNING - Gl5 · TRAFFiC/ACOUSTICAL Eb GINEERINC ~-601 Dove Street, Suile 290 · Newport Beach, CA 92660 * Phone: (949) 474-08)g · Fax: (949) 474-091)~ LAND GRANT DEVELOPMENT you have any (~uestions regaining this trip comparison, or require additional informalion, please donl hesitate Io give a call at (949) 474-0809. ASSOCIATES, INC. John Fain, AICP CB'.JK.:sld~11142 JN:1226-00-01 Ntachment TA~ILE 1 :' MIXED U~E TRIP GENERATION LAND USE OUANT;~ UNITSt IN-I OUT, JN OUT DAILY ~p~d~r~n= ~ DU 38 t~ 1;2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 142 ;~ . ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~1.~ TOT~ ,,- I~_ 1~ ,,, 215 47~ ~7 10~ OFFICE A14 r. KMATIVE 'l'Rko GENERATION .uu~u..~ ..... ,,~N I OUT ~N ,I,, our muz.y ~ ~ ~ .,- ~ 14~,. 3~ ~2 ~.7~ DIF~ J ~1 .,. -7oI +1~(~', ~! s DU = Dining Unit~ TSF = ATTACHMENT NO. 10 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FROM CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER R:\P D 0\99~)261 79 South\CC S[aff Report2.doc CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Denise Thomas, Associate Planner ~Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Traffic September 19, 2000 SUBJECT: Temecula Creek Project - Trip Generation Comparison As requested by the City, the consultant has prepared trip generation comparison for the proposed project for two (2) alternatives. Alternative No. 1 is the existing zone of professional office. Alternative No. 2 is the proposed mixed use, which includes apartments, offices and commercial retail. Alternative No. 1 - Professional Office The 32.7 acre project site using a 0.50 FAR would represent approximately 712,000 square feet of building area. Using this building area, the project would generate 945 trips during the A.M. peak hour, 1,275 trips during the P.M. peak hour and 10,755 total daily trips. Alternative No. 2 - Mixed Use Under this scenario and using a 10% reduction for internal capture, the project would generate 414 trips during the A.M. peak hour, 985 trips during the P.M. peak hour and 10,260 total daily trips. As demonstrated, the proposed mixed use alternative utilizing a 10% trip reduction for internal capture, would generate fewer trips than the professional office use for both A.M. and P.M. peak hours, and the total daily trips. All trip generation rates are from the 6t~ edition (1997), Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) handbook. ATTACHMENT NO. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING EXHIBIT R:\P D O\99-0261 79 South\CC Staff Reporl2.doc 15 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0261 VICINITY MAP ~".';.-2c o,~,~.ss,o. DAT~-J,,.E 2,.2ooo \\TEMEC FS101~VOL1~Depts\PLANNING'~PDO\99-0261~261PA99 PDO PC.doc - 28 CITY OF TEMECULA ,-;.'~ PROJECT SITE EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) ZONE PROJECT SITE EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (POI CASE NO. - PA99-0261 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 21, 2000 ~OOC \\TEMEC FS101\VOL1~Depts\PLANNING\PDO\99-0261~261PA99 PDO PC.doc - 29 EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT E PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP CASE NO. - pLANNING APPLICATION 99-0371 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JULY 19, 2000 \\TEMEC_FS101 \VOLt 'Oe~s~PLANNING~G P A~A99-0371 ~STAFFRPT.PC.doc 9 EXHIBIT F ~iUILD-OUT AVERAGE ~,ILy TRAFFIC (AO_T) .... WITH VIA RI0 TEMECULA RD. 63.1 LEGEND: 14.7 = VEHICLES PER DAY (100~S) N RKJK EXHIBIT G ~ UILD-OUT AVERAGE B'AILY TRAFFIC (ADT) WITHOUT VIA RIO TEMECULA RD. LEGEND; 15.4 = VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S) N 1226-~94~12a RKIK ITEM 10 CITYA']-i'ORNEY ~' ]~ ~ -" FINANCE OFFICER ~z,~_ ] II CITY MANAGER ~ ]1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ,~ October 24, 2000 Community Service Funding Program Committee Recommendations for Fiscal Year 2000-01 PREPARED BY: Denise Caravelli, Administrative Secretary RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1 ) Review and approve the 2000-01 Community Service Funding Program grants per the attached table outlining the committee's recommendations of 43 organizations totaling $160,000 2) Approve an operating transfer of $10,000 from the unallocated Capital Reserves DISCUSSION: At the City Council meeting of February 22, 2000 the City Council appointed Councilmembers Jeff Stone arid Mike Naggar to the 2000-01 Community Service Funding Program Ad Hoc Committee to allocate grant funds to non-profit organizations that provide community services to the citizens of Temecula. Community Service Funding Program applications were mailed to 90 non-profit organizations in the Temecula Valley area on July 19, 2000. In addition to the mailing, advertisements were placed in the local papers. A total of 59 organizations submitted applications requesting $314,840 in grant funding. On October 12, 2000 the Committee, along with staff members, reviewed the requests for funding based on criteria previously adopted by the entire council. After review and discussion, 43 of the 59 organizations are being recommended for grants, totaling $160,000. (See attachment) The approved budget for Community Service Funding was $150,000; therefore, the ad hoc committee has recommended a $10,000 transfer from the unallocated Capital Reserves, which was set-aside for the Chaparral Stadium Track Project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Community Service Funding available budget of $150,000 and operating transfer of $10,000 will be required to fully fund this request. Attachment: Community Service Funding Program Committee Recommendation R ICaravelli DeniselCSF~OOOl ~OO~l CSFAgenda report, doc 10/18/00 ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITYMANAGER CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: .~,~Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services DATE: ",-E)ctober 24, 2000 SUBJECT: Holiday Schedule for City Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION: Direct the City Clerk to set the schedule for City Council Meetings during the holiday season and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements of the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City Council Meeting of December 26, 2000 fails within the Holiday week. Therefore, it is suggested that the meeting either be cancelled or rescheduled to December 19, 2000. FISCAL IMPACT: Changes of dates for City Council, TCSD and RDA meetings will result in no additional cost to the City. Agenda Reports/Holiday Schedule I ITEM 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFIN/~E~ CITY MANAGER/~'/~'J TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council )usan W. Jones, City Clerk/DLrector of Support Services ctober 24, 2000 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Appointment PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative Secretary RECOMMENDATION: Appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the PubLic/Traffic Safety Commission through October 10, 2003. BACKGROUND: The term of Commissioner Lanier expired on October 10, 2000. The City Clerk's office has followed the Council's established procedure for filling Commission vacancies by advertising the openings in two different local publications. When the deadline was reached for receiving applications, the applications were forwarded to the subcommittee comprised of Mayor Stone and Councilmember Roberts for review and recommendation. Both Mayor Stone and Councilmember Roberts recommend the re-appointment of Scott Lanier to serve a full three-year term through October 10, 2003. All applicants are registered voters of the City of Temecula. Attached are copies of the applications that were received by the filing deadline of September 28, 2000. ATTACHMENTS: Four (4) Copies of Applications for Appointment Agenda Reports/Appointment Traffic Commission 1 Sep 28 OD O3:;~1p Pirst step ghses 909 3102 3891 po1 CI~OFTEMECU~ 09-2g-00 P01:22 IN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Check one: _. Planning Commission YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: -Community Se~ ces Commission ~Public~raffic Safe~ Commission EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: E ~ LIST ANY RIVER~IDE COUNTY OR OTH~ CiTY BOARD, COMMI~e OR CO~MISSION ON WHICH YOU HA~E SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service/: BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE 'YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): 7-_Z. ~octL~c.I {-,'ye 4: s~r:;e O~ y4~/. -- ~ . · . I onoerstaod information for pob]Ic /~formatfo~ purposes. ~ :.~o. ~ consent to the~leasa of t~is SIGNATU~ DATE: Return to; City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca, 92589-9033 ~Back to Commission Pos!.[~o?__s Ava lab~e pa~q~ Sep 28 O0 03:22p Pirst step ~hses 909 302 3891 09 28-00 A08:55 IN CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Check one: Planning Commission Community Services Commission '"~ Publicrl'raffic Safety Commission ADDRESS: ~\c~o~J OCCUPATION: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA I-~ WORK PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: ~¥ ~ P' ~ '~ ""J'-'-'-'-'-'-'~ EMPLOYERAODRESS: {~o~---~ ~-~/~P' EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: C.N~C.~) r~" (~ s'~ ~X~.~-N~- LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMI~EE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): B~EFLY 5TAT~ ~HY YOU ~l~H TO 5~R~ ON THIS ~OMMI5510N, AND ~HY YOU YOU AR~ OUALIFI~D FOR TH~ POSITION. B~ 5PE~IFI~ (U~ additional paper ff I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the rslea=e of this information for pu~mation purposes. SIGNATURE: ~/~~*'''*K~''''/C'f~-~ DATE: ~ ~ ''-y'- ~0 Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions~Application for various Commissions Attachment APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION I am seeking appointment to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, because I would like to become more involved in our community and have a positive impact on its growth and development, as well as the overall quality of living for the residents of Temecula. As a Riverside County Deputy Sheriff (July 1989 - April 1996), retired, I have extensive work experience with both public and traffic safety. During my tenure as a Deputy Sheriff I worked in the contract city of Moreno Valley and performed numerous functions, including criminal patrol, traffic enforcement, accident investigation, and community oriented policing. I have received specialized training in crime prevention, accident investigation, and community oriented policing. My training and experience as a Peace Officer uniquely qualifies me to hold a position and would be a valuable asset to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Check one: Planning Commission ~ Community Services Commission × Public/Traffic Safety Commission NAME: Scott Lanier YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 11 ADDRESS: 32232 Corte Coronado, Temecula, CA 92592 909-693-9976 WORK PHONE: 909-296-3718 HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: Operations Manager EMPLOYER NAME: Federal Express EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 27260 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, CA 92590 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: 1978 B.A..- Social Relations - UC Riverside 1975 A.A, - General Education - Riverside City College LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: March 2000 - present City of Temecula, Public/Traffic Safety Commission ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): See attached. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. S, NATURE: D^TE: Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions~Application for various Commissions Briefly state why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for this position. Be specific. For the last seven months, I have served on this commission. It that time, I have attended and voted in every commission meeting. I know what it takes to come to each meeting prepared, yet still with an open mind to listen to the public. I also have been able to establish a professional and productive working relationship with city staff and my fellow commissioners. This has enabled me to quickly and efficiently answer concerns or questions I have received from the public, sometimes giving them a satisfactory answer the same day. The reasons for re-applying are the same for when I originally applied. I wanted the opportunity to serve my community. The time I have served on this · commission has only increased my desire to serve a full term. I feel I have done a good job of representing the city and it's citizens, with enthusiasm and professionalism. SCOTT LANIER CORTE CORONADO TEMECULA, CA. 92592 (909) 693-9976 EDUCATION June 1978 June 1975 B.A. Social Relations A.A. General Education U.C. Riverside Riverside Community College EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE May 1997 -Present Operations Manager - FEDEX - Temecula, CA Responsible for workgroup of 20 couriers/customer service agents to ensure the delivery and pickup of time sensitive overnight freight. Other duties include keeping station in compliance with all FEDEX audit guidelines and applicable laws as well as resolving customer complaints. Was awarded the FEDEX Star Award in March 1999. April 1986 - May 1997 Courier - FEDEX - Temecula, CA Responsible for the timely delivery and pick-up of critical overnight packages. Developed extensive area knowledge of local and regional streets, roads and highways. Earned nine year safe driving award and was the Temecula station's safety representative. SPECIAL INTERESTS Fresh water fishing, bicycling and baseball. REFERENCES PROVIDED UPON REQUEST 09-25-00 CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION iN Check one: Planning Commission Community Services Commission //Public/Traffic Safety Commission NAME: ADDRESS: ,~7~ OCCUPATION: ~] EMPLOYER NAME: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CiTY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WI-~Y YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this infor~~ ation for public information purposes. SIGNATURE. DATE: ~-',~ -Z2 0 Return to: City C[~'k's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 O._.~R Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Commissions~Application for various Commissions September 26, 2000 City Clerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA. 92589-9033 Re: Application to Public / Traffic Safety Commission My family first came to Temecula Valley in the mid seventies. On our many trips fiom Phoenix to Los Angeles, we would always take the long route to visit this beautiful valley. We remember when the area was known as Rancho California and traffic was directed by white gloved traffic managers! We moved to California in the early eighties, and because I was in the wine industry, Temecula became a favorite destination. Regretfully, my travel demands required that I live closer to an airport, so we move first to Anaheim and then Corona. In the spring of 1999, when I established my own business, we immediately relocated to Temecula and are proud to finally call Temecula our home. I have seen the city grow over 20+ years, and my goal with this application is to take an active part in Temecula's future and the future of my family. I believe that the city has challenges that only active participation by its citizens can address, and working together, solve. The safety of it's citizens has to be the number one responsibility of any community. Not jnst it's current population, but the safety of future citizens as well. That requires effective planning, forecasting, budgeting and an open mind for change. All of which I have had in my management positions at Inglenook, Robert Mondavi, Trefethen and Lockwood Wineries. I bring maturity, (I am 50 years old) and real life experiences fi'om living in larger cities and extensive travel. I want to be an active participant in the future of Temecula, this is our home! Thank You. Sincere y, (909~ 17-2675 ITEM 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF CITY MANAGER .~...~ -- TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City ManagedCity Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~.VVV~ October 24, 2000 Consideration of Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan - Councilmember Pratt RECOMMENDATION: Consider steps as recommended by Councilmember Pratt in his report dated October 10, 2000, Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan. BACKGROUND: At your October 10, 2000 meeting, Councilmember Pratt provided City Council and staff with a report entitled Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP). At that time, Councilmember Pratt requested that this report be placed for City Council consideration at your October 24,2000 meeting. A copy of this report is attached for your consideration. As noted in Councilmember Pratt's accompanying letter, the ETCP contains 19 detailed points. If implemented, a number of the points would involve significant expenditures of resources - staff time or direct expenditures. Recently, the City Council adopted the Operating Budget for FY 2000-01 as well as the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY 2001-05. Both of these policy documents identify the City Council's focus and work plan for the current fiscal year. Because of the challenging projects and work programs that have been identified in the Operating Budget and CIP, significant additional assignments, projects or work programs could affect the completion of various programs and projects in the City's CIP projects and other work programs. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. There would be potential costs if Council wishes to implement steps outlined in this plan. ATTACHMENT: ETCP Plan dated October 10, 2000 p:standa rd\staffre port. shell 1 Tuesday, October 10, 2000 City Manager City Staff City Council City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Subject Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETC-'P) Dear Sham, Members of the City Staff and Members of the City Council: This is a brief snmmary of five pages of the attached statement I have a printed coP~es for the record and for Council and Staff review. I have COl~es for the press for their review. Citizens may request a copy from our staff or contact me by emml sampratt~,nctimes, net and I will aUach a copy on reply. If the Council wishes the entire report may be read publicly by the City Clerk Local Temecula Traffic has not and cannot be mitiqated throuqh the use of professional traffic consultantsl According to DMV statistics the lest 8 months (January, 2000 through August 2000) have seen the Temecula City vehicular traffic increased by 4,412 registered units. The number of autos, motorcycles and trucks and grow at a rate of 6.86 vehicles per residence (4412_/643 building permits). We now have (August, 2000) 53,423 registered vehicles (DMV) equivalent to a line of vehicles - bumper to bumper- from Temecula to Santa Barbara a distance of 150 miles. This is absolutely unacceptable! The impleme~ation of this plan - Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - to 'jump start' the relief of traffic congestion, and in addition provide the Planning Department with a ~breathe~' to have a more equitable and orderly review of Specific Plans for the citizen as well as the developer. THE COUNCIL MUST IMPLEMENT AN EMERGENCY TRAFFiC/CIRCULATION SOLUTION THAT WILL CONSERVE OPEN SPACE AND REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION - NOT A DEFENCE OF POLICIES THAT HAVE MADE TEMECULA THE "RESIDENTIAL DESTINATION" OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTYI There are 19 detailed points to the ETCP. A 'pause" for preparation is supported by California code Section 65858 (a). Califn~i~ Registratim: Civil En~ar iqo. 7697 Stn~uxal .~i~ar No. 650 ALBERT S. PRATT Since 1919 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Email: sa, ,ratt cro.com) (909) 699-8689 Tuesday, October 10, 2000 Shawn Nelson City Manager city staff City Council City of Temesula 43174 Business Park Ddve Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - (Attached am two timely exhibits: Los Angeles Times article, October 6, 2000, and a Traffic stagnation Solution prt~-~tation I made on October 13, 1999, from a field traffic count, at the comer of Winchester Road (SR79N) and Margarita Road - The Mall) Dear Shawn, Members of the City Staff and Members of the City Council: The following statements address a solution to a major traffic emergency for our City, the developers and the citizens. I have a printed Statement for the record and for your review. I have copies for the press for their review. Citizens may request a copy from our staff or contact me by email sam~imes.nat and I will attach a copy on reply. Temecula and Murrieta are one community with two governments. Together we are the dominant citizen group in the Temecula Valley. The ETCP will not be successful without Murdeta's citizen involvement. Temecula must, initially, lead the way! According to DMV statistics the last 8 months (January, 2000 through August 2000) have seen the Temecula City vehicular traffic increased by 4,412 registe~d units. The number of autos, motorcycles and trucks and grows at a rate of 6.86 vehicles per residence (4412/643 building permits). We now have (August, 2000) 53,423 registered vehicles (DMV) equivalent to a line of vehicles - bumper to bumper- from Temecula to Santa Barbara a distance of 150 miles. This is absolutely unacce~abie! It also gives me the opportunity to voice my concerns over Traffic/Circulation as it affects the effectiveness of the GMP, and the health, safety and w~fare of our citizens, (not negotiable) which includes preschool plus K-12 children, adults and retirees. http://vwvw, ci .t emecula.oa.us/hom epaRe/Growth MRmt/actionPlan.ht m ) Local Temecula Traffic has not and cannot be mitiRated throuf:lh the use of professional traffic consultants! (An EIR -Environmental Impact Report - challenge to a traffic mitigation plan not based on the cumulative traffic of the City of Temecula may make public funding of public works improvements impossible without legislative action or court rulings. An EIR legislated to protect the citizens has been diluted through the courts - il must, again, be a document for the citizen and their environment). The issuance of fourteen (14) new alcoholic beverage licenses this year, 2000, is not good health, safety and welfare news for traffic congestion of the citizen. ALBERT S. PRATT Since 1919 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Email: sampratt~cro.com) (909)699-8689 Civil EnS~ No. 7697 Sln~ural Ensim~x No. 650 In pursuing sales tax revenue through vehicle sales we have degraded Temecula's environment through vehicle sales. Is Temecula in a position where only more sales tax revenue will allow it to survive? We no longer have the luxury of five year plans to mitigate traffic with the possibility of 15,000 more now care in Temecula. Little internal traffic circulation is physically possible east of 1-15! Should the present rate of vehicle sales continue we would have over 100,000 vehicles at some point on our pmsant streets! We have now a growing traffic circulation emergency affecting the citizen's safety and the success of the GMP. Citizen's perception of traffic congestion fuels their demand for reduced residential density in addition to their desire for open space. Physical construction - additional structure widening, bridges, ramps and other future plans will not only be too little to late, but too expensive. The available funding, for major new traffic mitigating construction should be used for other community demands. (City of Temecula Web Site - http://www, cl.temecula.ca, us/) The uncertainties of this growing problem have directly affected every person's health, safety and welfare. Three majer residential development projects pending approval have grown into uncertainties for the developer with the citizen pemeption that reduced residential density will cure the traffic congestion of Temecula. It will certainly help, but is not the solution - we are! The concept of constructing the Western Bypass to relieve industrial traffic to the west (now over 10 years from initial planning) is an urgent immediate need if our western industrial area is to avoid gddlock (and, of course, further expansion. Costly north and south interchanges are too far in the future to relieve traffic congestion. Past correspondence outlines my support of the ClP - Capital Improvement Report - for vadous infrastnJcture improvements planned east of 1-15 as well as the Westem Bypass, but not $200 million + to support work week transient traffic west of 1-15. The Council and Staff have been informed of my opposition to the First Street B~dge as not being cost effective. It is also a dangerous life threat using a residential area access for the traffic relief of transient workers and paid for by the citizens. It is my intention to agendize by October 24, 2000, the Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) concept with immediate implementation of those parts of the plan in which resources are mede available. Other creative solutions, minimizing capital expenditures, to further enhance and expedite this plan are welcome from Council, Staff and our citizens: 1. Dudng the five day werk week (holidays excluded) a motorized officer will be positioned dudng the afternoon rush hours (3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) at the following intemections: Rancho Califoroia Road at Diaz, Jefferson, Ynez and Margarita. Highway 79S at Margarita, Pala Read and the intersection with 1-15. Winchester Read (SR79N) at Margarita, Ynez and Jefferson. This will require 10 motorized officers to monitor the possibility of sedous traffic accidents due to congestion, and allow no trucks over 10,000 Lbs. GVW. 2. Added speed limit signs shall be posted not less than 1 per each direction and at the intersections, between signed or signaled intersections and all arterials. Below each ALBERT S. PRATT Since 1919 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Email: sampratt~cro.com) Calif,~i~ Regim~i~ Civil F~ ~gineer bio. 7697 Smsaxcr~l ~ne~ No. 650 (909) 699-8689 speed ,m~t s~gn sha be a small agn stat rig, Obey the Law' or "Save a Life', etc. (our school children will have creative ideas). On the street surfaco in each direction between the posted speed limit signs will be painted the speed limit. 3. Permanent Radar Speed Trailers will be permanently repositioned at intervals on our main dty arterials, and random positioning on demand on secondary arterials (Example: Calle Medusa, Via Cordoba) 4. Levy a City of Temecula traffic fine bail increase at the time of the headng of the moving violation before the judge of $50.00, in addition to the existing traffic fines. This revenue to off set the funds made available from other public funding sources, now being pumued by Staff, and an immediate revenue tatum to support the ETCP as well as a strong deterrent to the running of red lights, stop signs, speeding, reckless endangerment, etc. 5. An incontive program for "school moms" and citizens shadng the dde dudng "bell hours" and the morning and aftemonn hours of traffic congestion dudng the five-day work week. 6. A continuing traffic education program negotiated by Staff, in conjunction with the Traffic Commission, with the TVUSD, hosted by a uniformed officor, our Temecuia shuttle bus manager, and a representative of the RTA will be asked appear, at each school, each semester, in the City of Temecuia Grades K through 12. The purpose will be to educate prospective and teen-age ddvers with the purpose that this program will 'Iriclde up" to their families. 7. This program will, at a minimum, stress the value of dde shadng at all times locally to minimize traffic congestJon, safety (less vehicles in the city), respect for speed limits, impn3ve traffic circulation and, in my opinion, citizen participation in the program is the only possible present and future mitigation to allow new residential construction under the GMP. I consider the implementation of this '1~ al'llc education" concept the backbone of our traffic mitigation future and the effective execution of our GMP. 8. Implement a policy of no on street parking between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. dudng the 5-day workweek with holidays excopted. 9. Amend our General Plan to restrict garages for new residences attached or othen~ise to a maximum of a t~3-car garage. This will be a further deterrent to traffic congestion. 10. Special analysis of the reduced morning and afternoon traffic from busing all high school students, and eliminating high school student personal ddving. 11. Promote the safety and convenience of our shuttle bus servico together with TVUSD beses to further minimize the additional morning and afternoon school traffic now generated by mothers ddving their children to school and return by augmenting their school bus transportation at the "bell hours". 12. TVUSD educates our children w~ must work with them to develop ~safe walking routes" on an intedm emergency and permanent basis, including Stop signed and signaled intersections if required for safety of our children. An initial allocation of $100,000 by the City Council to "jump start" this program. This is a small amount to save a life and to support our GMP. 13. We have authorized hund~-~ls of thousands of dollars of feasibility and design studies for recreation and cultural projects. With our present and growing traffic crisis are w~ using good judgment in proceeding until our citizens are well advised of the impact on their environment? At this stage in Ternecula's development any project, recreational, cultural, industrial and commercial will exacorbate the danger to the citizen - should we proceed with a library, opera house, children's museum - can we get to them safely?. ALBERT S. PRATT Since 1919 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Emaik sampra~cro.com) (909) 699-8689 Civil f-~ No. 7697 ~ ~ blo. 650 Today's traffic may make them a danger to visit. We recently approved nearly $30,000 for a feasibility study for a water perk?. Traffic congestion and safety is certainly a higher pdodtyi 14. This initial allocation of $100,000 is to be followed by permanent funding through grants, new DIF's and an add-on tax of $300 for every new vehicle sold in Temecula, and at the present rate of vehicle sales is nearly $2,000,000 (20 new busses). Use of private funding sources will be mandatory for continuing effective traffic control - at least for a p(xtJon of the funds. My professional engineering efforts toward pdvate funding have generated hundreds of lettem with state agencies and the auto/petroleum industry. This information is available to our city to assist in setting new ere pdvate tmnspertation funding sources. 15. We have to implement the requirement for affordable housing. One of the many problems is the cop~ern over the quality of the person at the economic level to qualify and become our neighbor. This must not be a concern as wa all have the possibility in our life times to require pubtic assistance. Does this make us any less of an exemplary citizen? 16. In addition to the planned affordable new housing existing housing coming on the market through repessessions or other economic owner or developer situations that the city purchase and refurbish, if necessary, these houses in the many city neighborhoods they become available and place on the affordable housing market with every pdofity to this in need. This will diversify affordable houSng throughout our fine city. 17. Amend the City Code to bring the highe~ standards of the CC&R's as a further incentive to citizens perticlpation in the traffic./circulation issue. HOA's can volunteer monitoring in cooperation with Code Enforcement. 18. Citizen perception of the Council and Staff is that they must fight for their dghts. This does not make the citizens "happy campers" to understand and cooperate in controversial programs. We have greVang discontent with our City Government. A Council and Staff continuing program that finds ways and means to satisfy citizen's dghts is to be formed using all available city resources - including City Attorney legal opinions to exhaust all remedies before the interests of developers or other special interest groups are addressed. This pclicy will give all special interest groups that "what is best for the citizen is what is best for the City". 19. We must "Market" our plan to the citizens- they are the solution! The implementation of this plan - Emergency T~atric Circulation Plan (ETCP) - to "jump start' the relief of traffic congestion, and in addition provide the Planning Depertment with a Ubreather~ to have a more equitable and orderly review of Specific Plans for the citizen as w~ll as the developer. Ordinances even ballot measures may be required to have a total effective enforceable plan. The required emeq;lency measures will be executed after CounOl approval of the ETCP. By the November 28, 2000 - proposed for full execution of the ETCP there will b 919 more registered vehicle on Temeoula's streets and an approximate total of 54423 exceeding our total population. This is truly an emergency! ALBERT S. PRATT Since 1919 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Email: sampratt~cro.com) (909) 699-8689 The proposed 'pause" is supported by California Law:. California Code, Section 65858 (a): "- - - the legislative body, to protect the public safety, health and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an intedm ordinance prohibiting any uses which may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal which the legislative body, planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time." 1. I am requesting the above 19 suggestions be placed on the October 24, 2000 Council agenda to allow time for the Council and Staff to review FROM October 10, 2000. 2. If this emergency plans, with welcome upgrades, is approved by the Council. Staff will complete their review and provide an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for Council approval on the November 14, 2000 agenda. (Growth Management Action Plan, Section 4. Traffic Circulation System Improvements) 3. Staff -will prepare a detailed plan of executing the emergency plan, including named Staff personnel responsible for emergency implementation of the approved plan for Council approval on November 28, 2000. ~GO!' is 49 days after October 10, 2000. Hardly a deten*ent to the issuing of approved new building permits and underv, ay-resldentiai construction. THE COUNCIL MUST RESOLVE CITIZEN DISCONTENT WITH AN EMERGENCY TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION SOLUTION - VVITH CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - THAT WILL CONSERVE OPEN SPACE (Councilman Sam Pratt, "Perspectives, October, 20(X)), http:/gnww, ci.temecula.ca.us/cityhall/mayor cc/pratt/perspectives, btm AND REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION - NOT A DEFENCE OF POLICIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MADE TEMECULA THE "RESIDENTIAL DESTINATION" OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY! (Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Comerchero, ~Perspectives", October, 2000) http://www, ci.temecuta.ca.us/cityhalllmayor cc/comerchero/perspectives, htm- TEMECULA/MURRIETA AND THE VALLEY IS 'VVHERE iT'S AT!" Respectfully, Sam Pratt longer &a~y commu~. ; 1~ r~a promo~ u~ ] of~r~Is, ~ a~r~five tra~t ~ur~. it's no That retable da/Iv ~e, avera~ c}awl to work on ~euth~nd fr~wa~ 34 minu~s t~'m for the Wevio~ Y~r. D~v- ing home, a 414~n~ ~tSe, qui~an cxtra fO~m~n~ nouthern r~i~ caq~s, bu~s and other ~oUthec~ California The re~on ex~ to add 6.7 pt~ple m the ~xt t~o the equivalent ¢f two mom ~as~ 78% of trav, I of 2,920 Count7 ~ac{.~on ~th thek d~ t~' pta in ~s Ange.es County, the reda ~& But o~icla~s m~ht ~ ta~ c{~ ~ t~ulj but note8 .' ~ rank~ ~ m d~v-er ~pp~ess, really a .re~ona} Problem, sba ~t,~ss ~ e~nenced fairly ' Jaaimed freeways and snrface 'P~ ~ey f~do~yastl~td~J ' ~t~ are mining mornings and chne m the avera~ d~vet's ~t!a- ' "I uJtv t~ m~ ...... travel ume w~ a ~iflcant 'f~cto ..... - .... ~ ~m tbro~h ~he Sep ~v~ ~s~ ....... cau~ Some P~ple ~ m~e ~ ] Los ~tes s gem~ smd-~s o~ drive h~s %1. ' ~ '"~ "~ ~ " "-'" ~tcmS~oY~Jhatth~ho~.,, ~e~he~ls,~mg~edia. l~sAngeles.orOrangeeo~m~i~s, '~m~t~u~~'}leh~n mgep~n;he~.~u,eef. ~ndla~onihellO~y. But evey though the avet~,~ travel :~'.e~latigg congestion while ~:~ug'~no~, ~.~df ~nhe~alone. h~avm&/~ .time there jumped io~ir~utes, ~ve~ng.a ~r~ ar c~e~t from the f~l ~1 ~;ea~i and ~ ~- I~Y, ~ th~hit's ~e moa fmmj~ ~e ye~ ~fom. · ' ~ ~e~z ~ ~e eou~oum do~ ~ing bm ~t~. di~t route. '~aadm~tto~offit~sin~ EVenbefo'e~est~ke. conges. . o~kethoHar~r~myhy in:Riverside Cmmty, rdg~te~ed ,T . Vtntura eomm~crs, like those '~m{ ~d gro~ ~rceDt{bty over your~ff is pmlty mmch ~t ~.~- t~ir~omp~ ZT~ ~-~le t~p au the 101 1~ the past'f~ years. ~o~. he said. ffon, ' he ne ~ve ~me [rom Ca~s MorettI:s ~ve ~as gone from V~t~a Comty, California Re~tratic~: Civil Eni~eer No. 7697 gm.rural Engineer No. 650 ALBERT S. PRATT "Since 1919" 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Emil: mmpratt(~nctimes.net ) (909) 699-8689 October, 13, 1999 TRAFFIC STAGNATION PEOPLE POWER "RIDE SHARING" TRAFFIC COUNT WINCIIESTER ROAD: (Frenuenfl 15 CARS - ONE (1) PASENGER PER CAR (100%) "TYPICAL" daily traffic pattern on Winchester Road~ Ynez Road~ Rancho Californi: 12 CARS - 9 WITH (1) PASSENGER - 3 WITH (2) PASSENGERS (80%) 6 CARS WITH (2) PASSENGERS PER CAR - 1 CAR WITH (3) PASSENGERS PEg CAR (47%) THE ULTIMATE "RIDE SHARING" (Save $5000 per year per car - ACSC $6000PYr) ALL OF THE ABOVE 15 PASSENGERS (RT,4 Busses Temecula) CAN RIDE TBF, BUS (LESS THAN l%/car) ITEM 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY r ~'~.~ .. D RECTOR OF CITY MANAGEF~} CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhili, Deputy City Mange~'~,.~ Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney October 24, 2000 SATISFY 2020 Implementation Committee Agreement for the Development of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee in Southwestern Riverside County RECOMMENDATION: That the Council Approve the Implementation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; and Appoint a Councilmember and Alternate to the Implementation Committee that will be formed pursuant to the Agreement. BACKGROUND: The southwest portion of Riverside County has experienced significant growth in the last decade, far outpacing the region's ability to keep pace with the demand for transportation improvements. The number one issue facing the unincorporated county, and the cities of Lake EIsinore, Murrieta and Temecula is traffic congestion, and will be for the foreseeable future. The area has a patchwork of funding districts made up of Assessment Districts and Road and Bridge Benefit Districts. These are discrete areas of benefit with specified facilities; none of them address the regional traffic issue. Consequently, the Southwest Area Transportation Improvement System Funding 2020 (SATISFY 2020) has been developed to serve as the overarching funding district that will treat the transportation system as a whole and address regional needs. SATISFY 2020 began with the formation of an ad hoc policy committee in February 1999, consisting of elected officials and staff, RCTC staff, WRCOG staff, Southwest EDC, developers, and the Building Industry Association. The committee crafted the policy framework for SATISFY 2020 and, in the process, identified a road improvement network, developed an order-of- magnitude cost, ran a traffic model, made population and employment forecasts, and developed fee methodologies and fee scenarios. The committee also arranged for the preparation of draft implementation ordinances and agreements for use by the participating agencies. Agenda Repor~s/Satisf~ 2020 1 The ad hoc committee has reached a stage where decisions by the participating agencies must be made if the process is to continue. With the advice and consent of legal counsel for the three Cities, the County and WRCOG, two decisions are requested of you at this time: Approval of the attached Implementation Agreement, which will facilitate the establishment of the Implementation Committee, the successor to the ad hoc committee. The new Committee will consist of five voting members: One from each of the three Cities, and one each from the First and Third Supervisorial Districts. Each member's vote will be given equal weight. To date, several e~x officio Committee members have been identified: Caltrans, BIA, RCTC, WRCOG. 2. Appoint a Councilmember and Alternate to the Implementation Committee. Once the Implementation Committee is formed, the initial steps towards transportation improvements can be taken, commencing with the CEQA analysis that must be performed, developing a project priority list, preparing for the re-authorization of Measure A, and directing other activities needed to implement the regional financing mechanism, the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Because the Implementation Committee's work will take time, the three Cities and the County will each be asked to collect a mitigation fee on an interim basis from development that is approved by the City before the Committee completes its work on the permanent TUMF ordinance. The interim fee will mandate the addition of a condition of approval on each development project that requires the developer to pay the interim fee at the time of issuance of building permits. The interim fee would be collected by each of the Cities and the County and held in a separate account for use in financing transportation improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended action is simply to initiate the planning for this project. There should not be any substantial fiscal impacts from this action, other than staff time in preparing for and attending the Implementation Committee meetings. ATTACHMENT: Implementation Agreement. Agenda Reports/Satisfy 2020 2 10/6/00 IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT NO. 1 CREAT1NG THE SOUTHWESTERN COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE OF THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS THIS IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT ("Implementation Agreement") is made this __ day of ., 2000, by the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("COUNTY"), the CITY OF MURRIETA ("MURRIETA"), the CITY OF TEMECULA ("TEMECULA") and the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ("ELSINORE") on the one hand, and the WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ("WRCOG") on the other. COUNTY, MURRIETA, TEMECULA and ELSINORE are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "PARTIES". RECITALS WHEREAS, WRCOG is a joint powers authority created pursuant to that certain Joint Powers Agreement dated April 1, 1991 ("the JPA Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the PARTIES are Member Agencies of WRCOG; and WHEREAS, Article VIII of the JPA Agreement authorizes the execution of "Implementation Agreements" for the purpose of implementing, managing and administering area-wide and regional programs for the benefit of those Member Agencies who are parties thereto; and WHEREAS, according to various studies performed for the benefit of the PARTIES, as the result of the growth of population and employment opportunities within the southwestern area of the County of Riverside, including the jurisdictions of the COUNTY, ELSINORE, MURRIETA and TEMECULA, traffic volumes exceed the capacity of the regional system of streets, arterials and highways now existing, and that exactions from new development will construct only a portion of the local and regional transportation improvements that are needed; and WHEREAS, in response to these studies, each of the PARTIES contemplates the adoption of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Ordinance for the purpose of funding the .construction of regional transportation improvements needed to relieve traffic congestion within the jurisdiction of the PARTIES; and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this Implementation Agreement to establish an Implementation Committee of WRCOG and to authorize the specific activities provided for herein; and WHEREAS, the JPA Agreement provides that an implementation agreement may involve all or less than all Members of WRCOG, and at the present time only the COUNTY, ELSINORE, MURRIETA and TEMECULA are prepared to join this Implementation Agreement. COVENANTS Based upon the foregoing facts, and in consideration of the mutual covenants of the PARTIES, it is hereby agreed as follows: ARTICLE I CREATION AND PURPOSE I. 1 Creation of Implementation Committee No. 1. There is hereby created Implementation Committee No. I which shall be known as the "Southwestern County Area Transportation Improvements Committee" (hereinafter referred to as the "Committee"), pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII of the JPA Agreement. 1.2 Jurisdictional Boundaries. The jurisdictional boundaries of the Committee shall be coterminous with that part of the unincorporated area of the COUNTY within the Southwestern County Area Transportation Study area, and the municipal boundaries of ELSINORE, MURRIETA and TEMECULA, as such boundaries now exist or may hereafter be amended. 1.3 Purposes of the Committee. The purposes of the Committee are (a) to receive Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees collected by the PARTIES, (b) to prioritize and undertake transportation improvement projects that will increase the capacity of the regional system of streets, arterials and highways. ARTICLE II POWERS OF THE COMMITTEE 2.1 Powers. following: The Committee shall have the power, in its own name, to do any and all of the (a) To make and enter into contracts, leases and other agreements; (b) To employ agents, employees, consultants, advisors, independent contractors and other staff; (c) To incur debt, liabilities and obligations; (d) To acquire, hold or dispose of real or personal property; (e) To acquire, construct, manage, maintain and operate any structures, works or improvements; (f') To exercise the power of eminent domain; (i) To apply for, receive and utilize grants and loans from any source available; (j) To contract with the State and Federal Governments and other agencies; 2.2 Consistency With Studies and Ordinances. The Committee shall exercise its powers in a manner that will be consistent with the objectives of the Southwestern County Area Transportation Study, Mitigation Fee Act, and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Ordinances enacted by the COUNTY, ELS1NORE, MURRIETA and TEMECULA. ARTICLE III EFFECTIVE DATE; NEW MEMBERS 3.1 Effective Date. This Implementation Agreement shall become effective and the Committee shall be created as of the date the governing bodies of the PARTIES to this Agreement have authorized the execution of this Agreement. 3.2 New Members. In the event any entity desires to become a member of the Committee after its formation, not less than three-fourths of the existing members and each prospective member shall execute a memorandum specifying the obligations of the prospective member for contributions towards past or present Committee expenditures. ARTICLE IV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP 4.1 Composition. (a) Voting Members: The Committee shall be composed of one regular, and one alternate, member appointed by each PARTY, except that the COUNTY shall be represented by one regular, and one alternate, representative from the first Supervisorial District and the Third Supervisorial District. (b) Non-Voting Members: The Committee shall also be composed of the following non-voting members: Caltrans, the Building Industry Association and the Riverside County Transportation Commission. 4.2 Meetings. The Committee shall meet periodically, but not less than once in each fiscal quarter year, at such location within the jurisdictional boundaries of the PARTIES as the Committee may decide. From time-to-time special meetings may be called at the request of a Committee member. Notice of all meetings shall be furnished in writing to each regular and alternate member of the Committee and to each PARTY to this Agreement prior to the time appointed for the meeting. The meetings of the Committee shall be open to the public and shall held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act as set forth in the California Government Code, Sections 54950, et se_~_q. 4.3 Quorum. A majority of the PARTIES represented at any duly-noticed meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. 4 4.4 Voting. Except as otherwise provided herein, all actions of the Committee shall be passed upon the affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum of the Committee. If more than one representative from a PARTY attends,any meeting, the vote of that PARTY shall be cast by such representative as the PARTY may authorize. Each PARTY shall only have one vote. All votes shall be taken by roll call vote of the Committee members. 4.5 Meeting Rules. The Committee may adopt, from time-to-time, such rules and regulations for the conduct of its affairs as may be required. 4.6 Powers of the Committee. The Committee shall have the following express powers, duties and responsibilities: (a) Election of Committee officers; (b) Approval of the annual budget of the Committee; (c) Approval of amendments to this Implementation Agreement; (d) The exercise of powers of the Committee, including promulgation of policies, procedures and rules. ARTICLE V OFFICERS AND SUBCOMMITTEES 5.1 Officers. The officers of the Committee shall include a Chairman, Vice Chairman, and a Secretary-Treasurer. 5.2 Elections. Elections of officers shall be conducted every two years in the first meeting of the fiscal year, in the following order: Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary-Treasurer. It shall be a policy of the Committee to encourage the rotation of the offices among the Committee members. 5 5.3 Installation and Term. Officers shall assume the duties of their offices as the last order of business of the first meeting following the election and shall hold office until their successors are elected and installed, except in the case of their earlier removal or resignation. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment of the Committee, and such appointee shall hold office until the election and installation of his/her successor. 5.4 Other Committee Officers. The Committee may elect such additional officers as may be appropriate and with such duties and authority as the Committee may determine. 5.5 Resignation/Removal. Any officer may be removed, either with or without cause, by a majority vote of the Committee at any duly-noticed regular or special meeting. Any officer or director may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Chairman or Secretary-Treasurer. Any such resignation shall be effective at the date of receipt of such notice or at any later time specified in the notice. Unless otherwise specified in the notice, acceptance of the resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. 5.6 Chairman. The Chairman shall preside at all meetings of the Committee, and shall exercise and perform such other powers and duties as may be assigned from time-to-time by the Committee. 5.7 Vice Chairman. In the absence or disability of the Chairman, the Vice Chairman shall perform all of the duties of the Chairman and, when so acting, shall have all of the powers of and be subject to all of the restrictions on the Chairman. In the case of death or resignation of the Chairman, the Vice Chairman shall assume the Office of Chairman and fulfill the remainder of that term of office. The Vice Chairman shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as the Committee may prescribe. 5.8 Secretary-Treasurer. The Secretary of the Committee shall cause to be kept the minutes of all Committee meetings and shall cause a copy of these minutes, along with notice of all meetings of the Committee and subcommittees thereof, to be given to each of the PARTIES and WRCOG. The Secretary- Treasurer shall cause the books of the Committee to be audited annually by a Certified Public 6 Accountant selected by the Committee, and a written report shall be submitted to the Committee and the PARTIES. The Secretary-Treasurer shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as the Committee may prescribe. 5.9 Subcommittees. The Committee may create subcommittees which shall have the powers, duties and responsibilities as may be delegated by the Committee. 5.10 Compensation. If authorized by law, Committee members may be compensated for attendance at all regular and special meetings of the Committee pr of any subcommittee. ARTICLE VI BUSINESS OFFICE AND STAFF 6.1 Location. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 6.2 below, the Committee's business office shall initially be located at the offices of WRCOG, Riverside, California. The Committee may, from time- to-time, change by resolution the location of the Committee's business office. 6.2 Program Director and Other Staff. (a) The Committee shall appoint the Executive Director of WRCOG as the Committee's Program Director who shall be responsible for the general administration of the business and activities of the Committee as directed by the Committee; (b) The Committee shall appoint an attorney at law who shall serve as general legal counsel to the Committee; (c) The Committee shall provide for the appointment of such other staff of the Committee as may be necessary for the administration of the Committee; (d) As determined by the Committee, staff functions may be performed by employees of the Committee, by officers, directors and employees of the PARTIES, and by agents, advisors and consultants retained under contract by the Committee; (e) The Program Director and other staff of the Committee shall have such powers, duties and obligations as are established by this Implementation Agreement, the policies, procedures and rules promulgated by the Committee, and any contractual arrangements which may exist between the Committee and any third party. ARTICLE VII FINANCES 7.1 Budgets. Budgets. The Committee shall exercise its powers pursuant to General Budgets and/or Project 7.2 Sources of Funds. The primary source of funds available to the Committee shall be funds appropriated to it by the PARTIES pursuant to their respective ordinances establishing a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, and any matching local, state and federal funds. Secondarily, funds may be obtained from any other available source. 7.3 General Budgets. Annually at the first meeting of the Committee in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, a General Budget may be adopted for the ensuing fiscal year for the purpose of funding general administration, and the study of matters of general benefit to the Committee. General Budgets shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Committee. 7.4 Specific Proiect Budgets. For each specific transportation improvement project and program, the Committee shall adopt a Specific Project Budget. Specific Project Budgets shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Committee. 7.5 Contributions to Budgets. In the event any budget requires a financial contribution from any PARTY, such contribution shall be due, payable and delivered to the Committee within 30 days after receipt of the billing therefor from the Committee. To the extent permitted by state law, unpaid, past due contributions shall bear interest at the legal rate of interest from the date due to the date paid. In the event a PARTY fails or refuses to make a contribution, such PARTY shall not be entitled to participate in any of the activities proposed to be funded by the affected budget. 8 7.6 Funds and Accounts. As directed by the Committee, the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee shall cause to be established and maintained "Southwestem County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Trust Fund" for deposit of mitigation fee revenue, and such other funds and accounts as may be required by law and good accounting practices. Separate accounts shall be established and maintained for each specific project under development or adopted and implemented by the Committee. Books and records of the Committee shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by authorized representatives of PARTIES and the public. A quarterly unaudited financial statement shall be produced and distributed to the Committee and the PARTIES. The Committee shall adhere to the standard of strict accountability for funds set forth in Government Code, Section 6505. 7.7 Annual Audit. Pursuant to Government Code, Section 6505, the Committee shall contract with an independent certified public accountant to make an annual fiscal year audit of all accounts and financial statements of the Committee, conforming in all respects with the requirements of that section. A written report of the audit shall be filed as a public record with the County Auditor and with each PARTY within six months of the end of the fiscal year under examination. Costs of the audit shall be considered a general expense of the Committee. 7.8 Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Committee shall be from July 1 to June 30, following. ARTICLE VIII HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION 8.1 Hold Harmless and Indemnification. The WRCOG, its Member Agencies and their employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys' fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other cost arising out of or in any way related to the Committee. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the PARTIES and WRCOG to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to WRCOG and its Member Agencies. Therefore, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Committee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless WRCOG and its Member Agencies, their employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorney fees incurred by WRCOG and its Member Agencies, court costs, interest, defense costs (including expert witness fees) and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the activities of the Committee. ARTICLE IX AMENDMENTS, WITHDRAWAL OR DISSOLUTION 9.1 Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended at any time by a three-fourths vote of the Committee provided, however, that: (a) Any meeting at which an amendment is to be acted upon shall require 30-days prior written notice of the proposal, with the specifics of the proposed amendment to be set forth in the notice; and (b) No Amendment which increases the liability or financial obligation of a PARTY shall be approved without that PARTY's approval or that PARTY being given the specific option to withdraw from the Committee. 9.2 Withdrawal. Any PARTY shall have the right to withdraw its membership upon serving written notice of its intention thereof on the Committee and all other PARTIES at least fifteen (15) months prior to the effective date of such withdrawal; provided, however, that no such withdrawal shall relieve the withdrawing PARTY from financial obligations theretofore incurred by it under this Agreement. Upon withdrawal of any PARTY, the withdrawing PARTY shall receive its proportionate (based on contribution) or otherwise defined (by agreement of the PARTIES) share of the assets of the Committee (or the equivalent value thereof) within a reasonable amount of time after withdrawal and shall contribute its proportionate or otherwise defined share towards the discharge of any enforceable liabilities incurred by the Committee as the same appear on the books of the Committee. 10 9.3 Dissolution (a) The Committee may be dissolved upon a vote of not less than three-fourths of the members of the Committee at least 120 days before the effective date of such dissolution; provided, however, that no such dissolution shall relieve the PARTIES from financial obligations theretofore incurred by them under this Agreement. (b) Upon dissolution of the Committee, each PARTY shall receive its proportionate or otherwise defined share of the assets of the Committee within a reasonable amount of time after dissolution, and each member shall contribute its proportionate or otherwise defined share towards the discharge of any enforceable liabilities incurred by the Committee as the same appear on the books of the Committee. (c) In the event it is impractical to distribute a proportionate or defined share of the assets to the PARTIES, then any property interest remaining in the Committee following a discharge of all obligations shall be disposed of pursuant to a plan adopted by three-fourths majority vote of the Committee. ARTICLE X DISPUTE RESOLUTION 10.1 Arbitration. Any dispute which may arise by and between any of the PARTIES in connection with this Agreement shall be submitted to binding arbitration. Arbitration shall be conducted by the Riverside County Transportation Commission as set forth heroin. The arbitrator must decide each and every dispute in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all other applicable laws. The arbitrator's decision and award are subject to judicial review only for material errors of fact or law in accordance with Section 1296 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Limited discovery may be conducted in the arbitration proceeding upon a showing of good cause and approval of the arbitrator. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this Implementation Agreement on the day and year indicated. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Dated: By Chairman, Board of Supervisors CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Dated: By Mayor CITY OF MURRIETA Dated: By Mayor CITY OF TEMECULA Dated: By Mayor WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Dated: By Chairman DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROV~,4,,~.,.~'~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF F1NANC~ CITY MANAGER <~) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~r~ October 24, 2000 Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of September 2000. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries In the month of August, the City responded to 3 leads. The leads consisted of a manufacturing industrial baking equipment company, a potential Lifelong Learning Center, and a products company. In the month of September, the City received 8 (IEEP) inquiries and 1 lead. On September 11th, staff met with representatives from a studio company that is considering opening a film production studio in Temecula. They have been talking to several local brokers on a potential site. Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building can be found in the Community Development Department report. Site Visit On September 12~, staff attended a site visit with Mark O'Connor and Lisa Garcia-Gleissner and met with Advanced Composites Engineering. The company relocated from Orange County about 8 yearn ago. The company specializes in carbon fiber, Kevlar and fiberglass and they focus on the following industries: auto racing, aerospace, motorcycles, recreational sports, medical and government work. They have expanded in Temecula to a 7,500 sq. ft. building. Their biggest challenge is finding and keeping skilled employees. As a result of the meeting, we put the owner in touch with Mary Williams at the Workforca Development Center to assist in their recruiting efforts. Film Leads & Hicthliclhts in the month of September, the Film Council received 376 phone calls regarding the Film Festival and 13calls regarding locations information requests. The TVFC web site www.temeculafilm.org was activated on September 4, 2000 and by the end of September the TVFC received 378 hits. Major Studio Contacts Ralph Coleman of Miramax Studios requested locations and information on local lakes with buildings near the water, specifically Lake Elsinore and Lake Skinner for filming in December and January. The Film Council was able to provide information and photographs including additional locations of Vail Lake and Lake Village. Please refer to the attached Film Council report for additional activities. Media/Outreach Materials Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled "Overland Bridge Overcrossing Receives State Wide Recognition" (The League of California Cities Helen Putnam Award). The article discussed the project's challenges, success, the partnerships formed, as well as how this project has benefited the community. Staff wrote an article for the first edition of the 2000-2001 Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County newsletter. The article "Temecula Welcomes Many New Businesses and Expansions" is an update on our impressive growth in the retail, manufacturing, and high tech sectors. Temecula's business license listing is now available on the City's website. A person can pull up information on any type of business and get information on them including a description of their business, their website address, contact information, etc. When Temecula businesses renew their business license the City will send them a thank you letter with a copy of the new Business Resource Guide for their reference. Meetin,qs On September 7a, staff attended the EDC's Business Relations Committee Meeting. Follow- up action reports and company contact reports were given. Staff reported that Temecula's business licenses can now be accessed on the City's website, that the City will be conducting a Community Survey, and gave an update on the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. Staff also announced that there would be a Mayor's Lunch with local major retailers on September 12th and a local commercial brokers meeting would be held on the 26th. Staff met with Ken Brockman on September 14~ regarding the creation of a not-for-profit research institute, tentatively called the 'SoRiCo Institute' here in Southwest Riverside County. The overall objective of the 'SoRiCo Institute' would be to increase the amount of high-tech R&D activity in the area as well as expose local students to research activity, with the goal of creating more career opportunities for them in 'emerging growth' companies. Staff provided him with the names of several people to discuss his ideas with - both as potential partners and sponsors. Staff also provided him with some resource materials, which would help him in developing a business plan as well as finding funding sources. Staff held a meeting on September 26th with approximately 25 local commercial brokers to discuss city projects and issues and to exchange ideas. Agenda topics included a presentation of major CIP projects, discussion of planning processes and our new pre- application handbook and the City/Alliance marketing programs. There was also discussion on the recent City resolution opposing the increased residential density and rezoning of industrial land near French Valley Airport and the TUMF fee. Staff is working with WP, COG to obtain further information of the TUMF fee to forward to the brokers. Staff also will be forwarding information on the French Valley Airport development. Staff attended the Murrieta Temecula Group meeting on September 1= at Callaway. Staff attended the Alliance meeting held on September 5~. Items discussed included an advertising update, trade show participation, and other marketing related issues. On September 12~, a Mayor's Business Lunch meeting was held at Temecula Creek Inn with local major retailers. Representatives from Sears, J.C. Penneys, Robinson/May, Costco, Mervyn's, Target, K-Mart and Lowes attended. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council meeting on September 13th. Electro-Numerics, a Temecula-based company, displayed and demonstrated their various products. They have been designing and manufacturing digital display products including digital panel meters and large digit displays for over 25 years. Also, Keyence Corporation, a global manufacturer of sensors for factory automation, discussed the use of sensor technology in manufacturing. Through September, staff continued to meet with representatives of Kearny Real Estate and Scotts regarding their pending project. Staff attended Home Depot's Sneak Preview Party and Board Cutting Ceremony on September 13~. Temecula's 105,700 sq. ft. Home Depot opening makes it the 15~ store in the Inland Empire since 1985. The store, which stocks about 50,000 home improvement products, will employ about 150 people. Jim O'Grady met with Bob Dowden of Guidant on September 15th regarding ideas for corporate recruiting. Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County's Quarterly Luncheon on September 28~ in Lake Elsinore. Dr'. John Husing gav~ a presentation on the demographic profiles of Temecula and Lake Elsinore and Michael Bazdarich reported on Murrieta's demographic profile. Staff attended the IEEP Community Partner's Meeting on September 28~ at the Hemet Workforce Development Center. The IEEP reported on its recent leads and marketing activities. A tour of the MSJC Technical Skills Training Center was conducted. Staff attended the Temecula CONNECT meeting on September 22"d. The program offered tips about ways to get your company more media coverage. Also, Katherine Harfington talked about her new magazine called ~The T Sector" that will be debuting in October. The T Sector will handle technology news and resource information in the San Diego area. All the content from the magazine will be on the web as well as in their newsletter. On September 11~, staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County's Board of Directors Meeting. The election of Executive Officers of the Board of Directors was held. Officers for 2000/01 are: President Gary Youmans, Community National Bank; Vice-President David Phares, D.L. Phares & Associates; Secretary Phil Oberhansiey, Cannon, Parks & Oberhansiey; and Treasurer Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank. TOURISM Media/Outreach Materials On September 28~, staff met with The Guest Informant regarding possible advertising opportunities for next year in the San Diego and Orange County areas. Attached is a copy of Temecula's coverage in their hotel publication, which came out a few months ago. This is an annual publication that can be found in up-scale hotels in San Diego and Orange County. As an advertiser, Temecula received free coverage in the Guest Informant Quick Guide Fall issue, which is distributed at shopping centers, visitor centers, retail outlets, etc. in San Diego. Staff supplied information to The Los Angeles for their Fall 2000 Southland Fun Book, A Guide to Entertainment and Recreation. Information on Temecula's wineries, Old Town, skate park, golf, hot air ballooning and the Santa Rosa Plateau were included (see attached). Events On September 6~ staff held a meeting with event organizers and City Departments for The Race For The Cure event, which will be held on Sunday, October 22, 2000. The event will serve as a fundraiser for The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The attendance for this year's event is estimated between 10,000 - 12,000 attendees. A team of City of Temecula employees will be participating. In addition, staff attended the event's kick off which was held at Guidant on September 6~, Meetings Staff attended the Chamber's Tourism Committee meeting held on September 7~. Staff gave an update on City tourism advertising, outreach matadals, new Orange County CONVIS membership and informed the group of the City's participation on the Sign on San Diego website (website for the San Diego Union Tribune). In addition, staff distributed copies of the Temecula Reference Guide and encouraged people to attend the Rod Run Revisited and Race For The Cure events. On September 20=, staff met with Linda Kissam of the Winegrowers Association & Phil Bally regarding a co-op advertising proposal between the Winegrowers and the City. New Home Journal's national television series approached the Winegrowers to produce a 5 - 7 minute segment on a half-hour special called '~/Vatching Your Spidts Come to Fruition." After reviewing this proposal and a proposal for Sunset Magazine, staff felt that the City would benefit more from the Sunset Magazine advertising. The City of Temecula is now a member of the Orange County Convention & Visitors Bureau. As a member we receive a copy of their convention bookings. Staff will be working with Destination Temecula on trying to bdng some of that business to Temecula via a side day trip, spouse tdp, etc. FAM Tour On September 21~, staff met with the Inland Empire Toudsm Council and other individuals to finalize the arrangements for the '~Neekend in the Country" FAM Tour scheduled for October 6 - 8, 2000. The tour included Idyllwild, the histodc site of the Ramona Pageant in Hemet, and Temecula, Three representatives from the California State Division of Toudsm publications, travel wdters and editors from Westways magazine, TravelAge West Magazine, RV Journal, California Seniors, Malibu Times, West News Service, and Clay Francisco Films will be some of the attendees. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Media Attachments 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 October 16, 2000 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Sham: Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of September at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: 6 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet which includes information on demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc. Committee Highlights: Tourism & Visitors Council: The committee worked to coordinate a successful Fam Tour on October 20 & 21. The committee was very pleased with the response fi.om Tour Operators who were invited. The areas of confirmed invitees include, San Diego, North Hollywood, Victorville, Pasadena and Los Angeles. Several confirmed tour operators were fi.om contacts made by Chamber staff at the California Travel Market and Los Angeles Times Travel Show in February. Education Committee: The committee's Chairperson Mark Margolin and Alice Sullivan attended a meeting with TVUSD to discuss a partnership with the business community. The district will inquire to representatives fi.om Southwest Riverside County EDC, the Manufacturers Council, and other business organizations. Ways & Means Committee: Plans for the Autumn Fest Business Showcase are in place. 90 exhibitors will be participating and over 800 guests are expected to attend. The B2B Tech Expo has been rescheduled for Friday, January 26, 2001. Press releases have been sent to media contacts in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside and San Diego counties. Preliminary plans for Installation 2001 have begun. The event will be held on Saturday, February 17, 2001 at Pechanga Entertainment Center. Local Business Promotions Committee: The Local Business Committee is implementing a "Chamber Spotlight" program that Froggy 92.9 is sponsoring, Each month a member will be drawn from ail the new members that joined the chamber the previous month. That business will then be highlighted on Froggy 92,9 for the entire month. A Success Seminar will be held on November 14 from 11:30 to l:30pm which will highlight many basic employment laws for 1 businesses of all sizes. Approximately 75 guests will attend. The Shop Temecula First Campaign will run the month of November. Approximately 100 businesses are participating. The Committee is purchasing an inflatable float to promote Shop Temecula First in the Holiday Lights and 4th of July Parades. Government Action Committee: The Chamber is supporting Propositions 35, 37, and 39 on the November 7th ballot. A letter was sent to Governor Davis in support of SB1637 which would finally cap the shift of property tax revenues fi.om counties to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, and return to our cities and couuties revenue that historically has been theirs. The Governor intends to veto this bill. Membership Committee: Chamber staff and Ambassadors attended 14 Ribbon Cuttings month of September. The quarterly Open House is set for Tues. Oct. l0th at 5:30pm., new members can network and meet Board members and committee chairs. Business Expansion will be the topic at the Special Topic/Ambassador Breakfast on October 25th Embassy Suites Hotel ~ 7:30am. A panel of speakers will answer a variety of questions on this topic. Sterling Senior Community will be the host of the mixer on Wed., Nov. 15th. · Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 200 Winery Brochures and 200 Temccula Brochures to Desert hills Premium Outlets for distribution to visitors at the outlet. · 200 Winery Brochures, 100 Temecula Brochures and 50 Visitor Guides to the International Information Center in San Diego. · 200 Pechanga Entertainment Center Brochures and 150 Winery Brochures to Creckside Texaco for distribution to tourists. · 150 Visitor Guides and 100 Temecula Brochures to Prudential California Realty for distribution at a seminar in San Diego. · 100 Temecula Brochures, I00 Visitor Guides and I00 Winery Brochures to Embassy Suites for distribution to guests. · 1 I0 Winery Brochures and 25 Visitor Guides to Saddle Sore-onty for distribution at a family ride in Temecula. · 100 Temecula Brochures and 100 Winery Brochures to Prudential California Reality for distribution at a seminar in San Diego. · 100 Temecula Brochures to McMillan Homes for distribution to clients. · 75 Visitor Guides and 75 Winery Brochures to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center for distribution to tourists. · 85 Winery Brochures to Temecula Valley Balloons for distribution to clients. · 50 Winery Brochures to Pierson's Country Place for distribution to guests. · 50 Winery Brochures to PGI for distribution at their hospitality desk. · 30 Visitor Guides, Temecula Brochures and 30 Winery Brochures to Reality World for distribution to clients. · 25 Visitor Guides to Bella Sante for distribution to customers. · 10 Temecula Brochures} I0 Visitor Guides, 10 Winery Brochures and 10 Relocation Packets to Lennar Homes for distribution to clients. Marketing Highlights · The Chamber received a request for Visitor Guides in response to the Temecula ad placed in the 2000 San Diego North Official Visitors Guide. · Chamber staff is currently working with the Inland Empire Tourism Council's upcoming three city "A Weekend in the Country" Fam Tour on October 6, 7 & 8. · The Chamber assisted the City to formulate a special event Business/Visitor survey. 50 Temecula Valley International Film Festival and Temecula Rod Run Revisited Business Surveys have been faxed to various Temecula business's requesting post event economic impact. · The Press Enterprise and Californian now offer the Chamber a full-page advertisement once per month on which we have the oppommity to promote the various events and programs. Activity Report · Total Tourism calls were 1,857 in September. · Total Phone calls were 4,951 in September. · Total Walk-ins were 2,072 in September. · Total Mailings were 243 in September. · E-Mail requests were up 142 percent in September. · Web page user sessions: N/A Also attached are the Meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Local Business Promotions, Membership Committee, Government Actions and a September issue of Temecula Today! If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Thank you. Sincer~f~~.~ Mayor Jeffery E. Stone l Mayor Pro Tern JeffComerchero Councilman Ronald H. Roberts Councilman Sam Pratt Councilman Mike Naggar Shawn Nelson, City M~nager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Woinick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors -- 3 PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS * CHAMBER REFERRALS TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER, 2000 Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month 368 156 154 1179 1,857 138 59 1,211 176 3,441 N/A Total Year-To-Date 3,253 1,440 3,139 10,822 18,654 1394 542 14,941 1,936 37,477 N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 174 139 3,074 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 96 6 1336 SPECIAL EVENTS 36 8 637 GENERAL INFORMATION 376 95 7,026 RELOCATION 138 7 1,536 DEMOGRAPHICS 101 0 893 CHAMBER 766 0 7,746 MISCELLANEOUS 106 24 1,558 TOTAL WALK-INS 1,793 279 23,806 121 61 61 243 34 24 84 142 N/A THIS MONTH 3,441 2,072 243 142 MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL 1107 890 818 2,815 308 328 764 1,400 N/A YEAR-TO-DATE 37,477 23,806 2,815 1,400 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A 8,614 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber September, 1999 September, 2000 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 499 368 -26.25 Calendar of Events 107 156 45.79 Special Events 219 154 -29.68 General Information 1,455 1,179 -18.97 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,280 1,857 -18.55 RELOCATION 164 138 -15.85 DEMOGRAPHICS 52 59 13.46 CHAMBER 2,318 1,211 -47.76 MISCELLANEOUS 137 176 28.47 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 4,951 3,441 -30.50 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 139 174 25.18 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 87 96 10.34 SPECIAL EVENTS 46 36 -21.74 GENERAL INFORMATION 771 376 -51.23 RELOCATION 210 138 -34.29 DEMOGRAPHICS 64 101 57.81 CHAMBER 1157 766 -33.79 MISCELLANEOUS 76 106 39.47 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 319 279 -12.54 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,869 2,072 -27.78 MAILINGS TOURISM 122 121 -0.82 RELOCATION 77 61 -20.78 DEMOGRAPHICS 76 61 -19.74 TOTAL MAILINGS 275 243 -11.64 E-MAIL TOURISM 21 34 61.90 RELOCATION 25 24 -4.00 MISCELLANEOUS 59 84 42.37 TOTAL E-MAIL 105 142 35.24 * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls October 13, 2000 Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92593 RE: Activity Summary - September 2000 Business Development · Staff did not respond to any business development inquiries for the month of September. Marketing Outreach Staff attended the following meetings/events: · September 13, 2000 - Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council - Staff attended the monthly meeting at the Temecula Workforce Development Center. Presenters included Charles Usher of Keyence Corporation and John Wills of Electro-Numerics Corporation. Both presentations focused on technical processes of sensors and digital equipment. · September 20, 2000 - Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Mixer - Staff attended the Chamber Mixer held in Temeeula Towne Shopping Center. · September 28, 2000 - EDC Quarterly Luncheon - Topic for the luncheon was "Southwest Riverside County's Economic Forecast". Guest speakers included Dr. John Husing of Economics & Politics, Inc. who conducted the demographic profile updates for the Cities of Lake Elsinore and Temecula, and Dr. Michael Bazdarieh of UC Riverside who provided the same for the City of Murrieta. Business Relations · September 7, 2000 - Staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee Meeting. (See attached meeting minutes.) Administration/Organization · September 6 & 13, 2000 - Web Site Meeting with Debi Spitzfaden of Intaire Staff met with Debi Spitzfaden of Intaire to discuss the EDC's web site enhancement project. · September 8, 2000 - Staff met with Murrieta resident Amanda Ashley to assist with her personal workforce development inquiries. · September 8, 2000 - Staffinterviewed two candidates for a part-time office assistant position for EDC. Jim O'Grady City of Temecula Activity Summary - September 2000 Page 2 of 2 · September 9, 2000 - Staff met with catering staff and Lake Elsinore Community Services staff in Lake Elsinore to discuss preparations for the Annual Membership Luncheon held on September 28. · September 21, 2000 - EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in the Workforce Development Center in Temecula. (See attached draft meeting minutes.) · September 25 - October 2, 2000 - Diane Sessions was on vacation. The office was opened during that time and was supervised EDC Office Assistant Rhonda Blacharski. · During the month of September, staff coordinated details of the EDC Annual Membership Luncheon, responded to one web site email inquiry relative to employment, mailed the official ballots for Executive Officer elections, and submitted a press release to local newspaper media relative to board elections. This concludes the activity summmy for September 2000. Please find the year-end financial statements for FY 1999-2000 as prepared by Winifred Samstag, CPA. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 600-6064. Sincerely, Diane Sessions EDC of Southwest Riverside County ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, September 7, 2000 - 9:00 a.m. WorM'orce Development Center, Executive Board Room 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA Committee Members Present: Dennis Frank, UCR Extension Lisa Garcia-Gleissner, Riverside County EDA/ACCESS Stevie Hirdler, SWRC Economic Alliance Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc. Michael Lewin, Miran, Edwards, Cannon, Hatter & Lewin Pam Migliozzi, Dawn Human Resources Trish Nelson, US Bank Kathleen Newton, Publishing Professionals Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Bonnie Rem-Hanna, Diversified The Staffing Solution David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Gary Youmans, Fallbrook National Bank Also in Attendance: Bruce Drayton, CDM Group, Inc. Diane Sessions, EDC Staff Call To Order · Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m. Welcome · Michael Lewin welcomed Bruce Drayton of CDM Group, Inc. to the meeting and thanked all for attending. · Mr. Lewin presented Mark O'Connor with a "Good Samaritan" award for his kind ac~ during a business visitation with Harris Orthodontic Lab. Mr: O'Connor quickly assisted the business owner's wife when overhead shelving fell on her. Follow-up Action Reports · Safari Gard - Gary Youmans to send owners a list of local SBA lenders. Company Contact Reports · Harris Orthodontic Lab - Mark O'Connor reported the company manufacturers orthodontic appliances and molds for teeth using resin molds. Owner Richard Harris started the business in Carlsbad, CA and has been in operation for 24 years, with three years in Murrieta. Primary competitors and customers are local and in North San Diego, and principal suppliers include acrylic and wire manufacturers. Sales are up in the past year due to growth in the area. The company employs 11 individuals who live locally. There are plans to increase the employee base by several, and no plans to expand the location in the foreseeable future. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - September 7, 2000 Page 2 of 4 Mr. O'Connor reported the ventilation was inadequate due to the nature of acrylic use, and the lab should probably be located in an industrial-zoned plant. · Murrieta Bugle - Diane Sessions reported Lori Moss met Bill Knight, owner/publisher of The Murfieta Bugle. Mr. Knight owns Murrieta Bugle, a local newspaper, and Knight Printing. His printing business has been in operation since 1982 and The Bugle since 1997. Sales are up in the past year due to the economy. Primary customers are local businesses, primary competitor is Munieta Printing, and primary supplier is Kelly Paper. The company is self-ranked small, with no plans to increase employee base or expand location. · Inland Valley Regional Medical Center - Diane Sessions reported Lori Moss met with Chris Boyd, managing director/CEO of Inland Valley Regional Medical Center. The center was formerly known as Mission Valley Hospital of Lake Elsinore in the 1940's and 1950's, and has been in it's current location and operation since 1987. It houses 80 beds and employs 520 full- and part-time individuals. The center is seW-ranked as medium in industry size. Economy is ranked good in the private sector but ranked "getting worse" in the healthcare sector due to non-paying patients. Ninety-five percent of the employee base live locally and five percent live in other areas of Riverside County. There are plans to increase the employee base in the foreseeable future and to expand the facility, with a possible $4 million expansion of OB/ICU within the center. Future challenge includes annexation or incorporation of Wildomar to keep the monies local instead of through the County. · Stretch Forming Corporation - Diane Sessions reported she, Lisa Garcia-Gleissner, David Rosenthal, and David Waite met with Steve Chevlin of Stretch Forming Corporation in Murrieta. The company provides metal stretching and forming services to industries that manufacturer automotive sunroofs and architectural framing for aircraft including Boeing, Lockheed and Northrup. Thirty years in operation, the company relocated to Murrieta 15 years ago from Fountain Valley. There are 65 employees, 50 in manufacturing and 15 in administration. Employees live locally and are loyal to the company, which does not see many employee turnovers due to positive work conditions, management philosophy and benefits. No plans to expand the current location, which is leased. There are plans to increase the administrative employee base in the foreseeable future. Mr. Chevlin would like assistance with finding skilled computer support and is interested in colleges placement programs for IT support. Challenges include rising freight costs and location of the parking lot that is accessed by employees and delivery drivers, which is difficult and dangerous to enter/exit · Advanced Composites - Lisa Garcia-Gleissner reported she had an appointment scheduled for September 15 to meet with Advanced Composites. Mark O'Connor and Jim O'Grady volunteered to attend the visit with Ms. Garcia-Gleissner. · Toyota of Temecula - Dennis Frank reported a visit with John and Dan Atwood of Toyota of Temeeula. Sales were up and business was very satisfactory. Possibility of a Lexus dealership to be considered. The business has seen benefits from having the location of the Toyota plant in Ontario. Past traffic issues have improved. Would like information on technical/mechanical training provided through through schools and local colleges. · Magnaeomp - Dennis Frank reported that Magnacomp has a critical need for skilled tool & die makers and would consider funding a training program to meet the demand. Business Relations Committee Meeting M/nutes - September 7, 2000 Page 3 of 4 Goal Progress Report Fiscal Year-End Totals: There were no year-end totals reported due to no committee assignments fi'om August. New Committee Assignments Point persons for September included Keith Johnson, Bonnie Hanna, Gary Youmans and Lori Moss. Ms. Hanna received blue binder #2, Ms. Moss received blue binder #3, and Mr. Youmans received blue binder g4. Mr. Johnson was not present, but will have delivered to him green binder #3. Pam Migliozzi volunteered to assist on visits, as she would like to actively participate on the committee. · Strategic Visits - Michael Lewin announced the strategic visits for September were Earl & Pete's Finish, National Process Industries, Inc., Nascal Interplex, and Inland Artificial Limb & Brace. · 2000-2001 Visitation Calendar - Diane Sessions provided an updated 2000-2001 Visitation Calendar to committee members. · Business License List: Ms. Sessions requested that committee members remm their portions of the Temeeula/Murrieta business license list as soon as possible. EDC/City/County News and Information · City of Temeeula - Jim O'Grady reported the City's quarterly newsletter would be available next week; the City was working with Gottlieb Company to conduct the phone survey regarding city services and community feedback; approximately 4,000 city business licenses were now accessible on line to the public; the website was receiving many visitors; the property near Pala Road was in the planning phase for single family homes; a new sports park would be considered; a follow-up action for Tension Envelope was addressed relative to an traffic signal, which would need to be resolved by the State since the State owned it; the next leadership meeting would focus on retail and was scheduled for September 12; Costeo's grand opening was a success; Temeeula's Broker Meeting was tentatively scheduled and would feature the City's newly updated demographic report by Dr. John Husing City of Lake EIsinore - No report available. City of Murrieta / Murrieta Valley Chamber of Commerce - Kathleen Newton reported the presentation of the proposed entertainment center was held at the city council meeting; the home-based business survey was completed and would be printed soon; the grand opening for House To Home was scheduled for September 9 at 8:00 a.m.; the State of the City would be held at the Movie Experience on October 25; State oftbe Schools and Business Expo would be held soon; and the Murrieta Chamber Mixer was scheduled for tonight at Diversified. Temeeula Valley Chamber of Commerce - Bonnie Hanna reported a Business Showcase was scheduled for October 28 at Temeku; the next Mixer would be held on September 20 at Temeeula Towne Center; and the Board was looking at a potential relocation site near La Masters on Ynez Road. Riverside County EDA - No report available. SWRC Economic Alliance - Stevie Hirdler reported the commercial advertising for the region would be airing on a San Diego cable channel in three weeks. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - September 7, 2000 Page 4 of 4 Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the Temecula Chamber had rescheduled the B2B Expo at Pechanga Entertainment Center for January 26; and the Princess boat cruise was postponed until December for a holiday cruise. EDC Update - Gary Youmans reported the EDC Nominating Committee submitted their nominations for the election of officers to be held on September 21; the quarterly newsletter was in process; and Failbrook National Bank would change its name to Fallbrook Community Bank in October. Diane Sessions reported the next quarterly luncheon was scheduled for September 28 with Dr. John Husing and Dr. Michael Bazdarich as keynote speakers; and the Business Resource Guide was completed and available through the EDC, Economic Alliance, and the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta and Temecula. Adi0urnment The meeting adjourned at 10:03 a.m. 1~-13-200 2:09P~ FRO~ EDC-SWRC 9896006006 Economic Development Corporation of Sonflnve~t Riverside County PO i~x 1388 Temeeula CA 92~9~-1388 Office (909) 6oo-6o64 Fax (909) dessions~cdc-sw rc.o rg www.edc-swrt, org Fax To: Gloria Wolnick Fax: 694-6499 From: Diane Sessions Date: October 13, 2000 Re: EDC ACTIVITY REPORT - SEPT 2000 Pages: 7 (including cover) Comments: Attachments for the activity report. 1~-13-200 2:10PM FROM EDC-SWRC 909B00600B P_2 GENE~T.,L~DGE,,R 30-AUG-00 PAGE~ ECONOMZC D]EV~Z,OPMF, NT COR.PORATZON (315) 16~39~35 P~RIOD SNDIRG: 6/30/00 FIE; 6/00 RANGE; All Consol£datod ACCT DES~IPTION DAR REFER JRL DR/CR 100 CASH AI~D CASH EQUZV~%L~NTS, BEGINNING Beginning cash 6/30/00 77,026.96 DR 101 non-print contra to 'ca.h, beginning' B~ginning cash 6/30/00 77,026°96 (IR 1025 cash in checking - calif. Bank & Truer April disburee~ents 4/30/00 May disbursem~nt~ 5/31/00 June disburse~ent~ 6/30/00 Cash recelp~s-checking 6/30/00 36,034.47 DR 36,263.87 1040 ~one¥ ~arket - Calif. ~ & T~ust Adj, MM b~Zanoe 12/31/99 Cash receipts-checking 6/30/00 Cash rece£Dts-MN 6/30/00 '21,327.54 DR 35,000.00 C~ 1310 Pro~aid tngurance W/O Peb& Mar £ns. W. D. Brooks, Ins. W/O 3 mo~. £nsu=ance 2,328.00 DR 1420 Equipment J~ 5 77,026.96 PRIOR. BAT. JkNC, E 23,322-09-* NET ";~ANGE 77,026.96 BALAR'C,~ 53,704.87 1520 Accum. d~pr. - E~u£~men~ JE 5 77,026.96 PRIOR BALANC~ 23,322.09 * NET C~M;GR ?7,026.96-* BALANCB 53,704.87-** 2800 Fund balance, begl~n£ng 2880 over C/D CD 11,584.31 CR C/D CD 9,941.2V C~ C/D CD 14,738.29 C~ J~ I 36,034.47 PRIOR BALANC~ 54.32 * N~T CHANGS 229.40-* BA/,AN~ 175.08-** Jg 6 340.50 JE I 35,000.00 CR ~ 2 20,987.04 P&IOR BAL.~NOE. _7&~972.64 * NET CHANC8 13,672.46-* ~ 63,300.18 ** 3/31/00 Jg 3 367.16 6/02/00 263 CD 2,328.00 6/30/00 Jg 4 561.20 CR PRIOR BALANCE 36?.20 * 561.20 CR NET ~H~NG~ 1,766.60 * PALANCR 2,134.00 ** NO CHANGE 16,076.27 ** 6/30/00 J~ 7 1,332.00 C~ p~IO~ B~LRNCE 14,251.00-* 1,332.00 CR ~T CHANG~ 1,332.00-* B~LANCE 15,583.00-** 57,549.56-** 1~-13-200 2:10PM FROM F_DC-SWRC 9~19600600S P. 3 GENERAL LEDGER 30-&UG-00 P&GE: 2 ECONCUIIC DEVELOPlu~ OORPOmaTION (315) 16=39:35 PSRIOD SNDZNC: 6/30/00 FYS; 6/00 RANGS; &11 ConsoZ£dated ACCT DESCRIPTION D&TR RI~RR JNL DR/C~ 2880 over expenses(~O~TlNU~D) 8,202.81-** 3110 Memberships - cash Acl:~. MM balance Cash receipt e-~ 12/31/99 ~ 6 340.50 CR 6/30/00 PRIOR--CE 1,423.84 CR NET CH/~GE 1,423.84-* BAI,~NCE 39,329.84--** 3130 City contract Cash receipts-MM 6/30/00 JS 2 1,500.00 CR PRIOR ltz~T..~¢..~. 25,000.00-* 1,500.00 CR NET CHANGS 1,500.00-~ BALAN~ 26~500.00-** 3140 County contribution NO CHANCE 25,000.00-~* 3150 Special event revenue (qolf) Valco Financial Inc. Cash r~¢ei~ts-checkinq 6/15/oo 279 CD 6/30/00 ~ ~ ~/3o/oo JR 2 pP, j[OR ~M~.N C.E ~T ~d~NGK BALANCE 380.00 DR 17,134.00 C~ 3210 ~u~rterly lunch~ns Cash receipts-MM 380.00 1,030.00 CR 16,104.00 CR 720.00-* 16,754.00-~ 17,474.00-*~ 6/30/00 J~ 2 1,812.00 PRIOR ILaJ~ANCE 2,237.00-* 1,812.00 CR NI~T CHAN~B 1,812.00-* BAIJtNCE 4,049.00-** 3230 Interest inc_.~_._ cash receipts-check~ng C~sh receipts-~ 6/30/00 ,,-'I; I 4.47 CS 6/30/00 JR 2 467.75 CR PRIOR ~M.~li~ - 1,532.37~ 472,22 CE NET CH&NGE 472.22-* BALANCE 2,004.59-** 5110 Director - tem~o=ar~ services Diversified Tem~ Services Diversified Te~p Segvice~ Dlv~rsified Temp Se~ic~s Diversified ~p Se~icee Diversified T~p Se~tcoo Div~sifi~d ~p S~ic~s 14,193.59 DR 4/06/00 4/19/oo 5/04/00 s/19/oo 6/02100 6/15/00 6/30100 232 CD 2,110.80 241 C9 1,033.60 246 CD 2,800.51 252 CD 1,858.20 264 CD 1,847,20 277 CD 1,689.98 286 CD 2,853.30 PRIOR BALANCE 34,117.69 NET C~I~NGE 14~193.59 BALANCE 48,311.28 10-13-200 2:11PM FROM EDC-SWRC 9~960061a~6 P_ 4 GRNERAL L~DGRR 30-AUG-00 PAGEt 3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (315) 16;39=35 PERIOD ENDING; 6/30/00 FYE= 6/00 ~GE: All Consolidated ACCT DESCRIPTION DATE I~EFER JNL DA/C~ 5120 Diructor'B m~dlc~l relmhurs~m~nt 5150 Secretary - temporary services 5300 Consult£ng fees - Staff services 6010 Accounting 6020 Advertising Schola~t£c Spots 97.50 DR 6030 Consulting fees - general s/3o/oo 6040 Consulting fees - S~cial Projects Urban Futures 4/06/00 Publishing Professionals 6/15/00 7~086.00 DR 6050 Insurance - general W/O Feb · Mar i~e. W/O 3 mos. insurasce 561.20 DR 6160 office supplies Diane Sessions Diane ~essions. Diane Sessions Diane Sessions Hinckley & Scbmidt Diane Sessions Diane Sessions Diane Sessions 340.54 DR 3/31/oo 6/3o/oo HO CHANGE 333.33 NO C~J~NGS 7,144.89 ** 37.50 ** 1,500-00 285 CD 97.50 PR.TORBALANCE 97.50 NET C~M~GK 97.50 B~,ANC~ 195.00 490.00 ** 233 CD 6,930.00 273 CD 156.00 PRIOR ~AI~NCE NET CHA~ . 7,086.00 BALANCE 9,086.00 JE 3 367.16 P PRIOR BA~ANCE 1,652.22 * N~TC~ANGE 561.20 * ~ALANC~ 2,213.42 ** 4/06/00 234 CD L3.95 4/19/00 245 CD 7.25 5/04/00 248 CD 113.83 5/04/00 248 CD 44.15 5/19/00 258 CD 54,50 6/02/00 265 CD 10.74 6/02/OO 266 C~ 47.67 6/ls/00 278 CD 15.07 6/30/00 289 CD 33.38 PRIOR ~I,I.~NCE 1,089.99 NET CHANG5 340-54 ~t~P. NCE 1,430,53 6190 Equipment repa£ru .. 10-13-208 2:11PM FROM EDC-SW;~C 9096006006 GRN~PJ~L LEDGE~ '30-AUG-00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COR~OIRATION (315) 16=39:35 PERIOD ENDING; 6/30/00 FYE; 6/00 P~NGE; All Consolidated ....................................... ~=======~ ACCT DESCRIPTION DATE P~ffER 'JRL DR/CR NO CHANGE 210.00 ** 6250 Telephone G.T.E. 4/19/00 243 CD 93.89 O,T.E. 5/19/00 256 CD 90.64 ~nform~tion Technology 5/19/00 257 CD 101.63 Information Technology 6/02/00 267 CD 113.51 PRIOR BALANC~ 1~549.93 399.67 DR NET CHAHOK 399.67 * BALANCE 1,949.60 ** 6260 Postag~ Post/~ao~er 4/06/00 239 CD Dian~ SeB~on~ 4/19/00 245 CD postmaster 5/04/00 251 CD 66.00 Diane Sessions 5/19/00 253 CD 33.00 postmaster 5/19/00 255 CD 66.00 Pos~eter 6/23/00 281 CD 198.00 PRIOR BAL~N~ 654.20 528.00 DR ~ ~GB 528.00 6270 Print£ng/copying/bind£ng Mauric8 Printers Maurice Printere 1,193.87 DR 4/06/00 235 CD 22.63 5/19/00 262 CD 1,043.02 6/30/00 284 CD 128,22 PR~OR~M~,NCE q52.43 * NET C~ANGE 1,193.87 w BALANCE 1,946.30 ** 6280 Dues/"~erships/eubsur~ptions Press Enterpr£~e Temecula Valley Cbam~r The Call£ornl&n 195.00 DR 4/06/00 236 CD 32.~1 4/06/00 237 CD 100,00 5/19/00 254 CD 30.00 5/30/00 282 CD 32.89 PRIOR BALaNCE 64.22 * NET (~NGE 195.00 * BALANCE 259-22 ** 6290 lntegnet Cash receipts-MM 6/30/00 JB 2 19.95 CR PRIOR RALANCE 87.99 * 19.95 CR N~T CHANOB 19.95-* I[~.T.~Nt'~ 68.04 ** 6300 Web~£te Loo~net Loopnet Dr. Spit=laden Loopnet 4/19/00 244 CD 177,00 5/19/00 259 CD 277.00 6/15/00 275 CD 375.00 6/30/00 283 CD 177,00 10-13-200 2:12PM FROM EDC-SWRC 9090000008 6300 W~s£te(CO~TZNUED) 906.00 DR 6310 Conferences/tr&inlng/workshop~ Dlan~ Sessions 5/04/00 8.00 DR 6320 Travel Diane Sessions Diane S~sslons 46-32 DR PRZOR BALAN~ 6330 xea:l m/ente~cainment 6340 Rent County of Riverside County of Riverside County of Riverside £!ounty of Rive=side 3,642.62 DR 1,026.42 906.00 1,932.42 6390 Taxes & licenses Secretary of State 20.00 DR ~/z5/oo 6380 ~al fees 6390 Miscellaneous 6510 Membership (drive, 'directory, plaques} 6520 Publ£c relat£ons/m~ke~£ng 6540 Quarterly luncheon~ Embassy Suites Glass Blamters Cash 5/04/00 247 CD 1,824.38 5/04/00 249 CD 32.33 6/12/00 272 CD 199.o0 4/06/00 240 CD 898.08 5/04/00 250 CD 898.08 6/02/00 268 CD 898.08 6/30/00 287 CD 948.38 PRIOR I~.~NCE 9,149.39 * ~T C~AN~ 3,642.62 * BALANC~ 12,792.01 ** 6/15/00 296 CD 31.00 6/30/00 289 CD 15.32 PRIOR BALP~CE 662.35 NET CHANG~ 46.32 B~NCE 708.69 NO CHANGE 50.00 ~m 280 CD 20.00 PRIOR ~T,~C~ 109.24 ~ NET C~ANG~ 20.00 * ~,ANC~ 129.24 ** NO CHANGS 159.20 ** NO CHANCE 491.94 ** NO CHANGB 11.26 ~OCI~ANGB 50.00 ** 248 CD 8.00 PRIOR BALANCE 240.97 NET C~NG~ 8.00 BALANCE 248.97 10-13-200 2:12PM FROM EDC-SWRC 9096006005 P. 7 GENERRL I~DGER 30-AUG-O0 PACE: 6 RCONOHIC DEV~I~0PN~;i~ CORI~RATION (315) 16:39:35 PRRIOD ~DING= 6/30/00 ~E: 6/00 ~E; All ~ol/dated l~ DES~IP~I~ DATR ~R ~ 6540 Quarterly luncheons(CONTINUED) 2,055.71 DR 6$70Golf tournament l~mecula C~eek Inn Fasts£gns T~cula Trophy 2,843.05 DR ~760 Depreciation Depreciation 1,332.00 DR* PRIOR NST BALANCE 2,740.17 2;055.71 4,795.88 5/19/00 260 CD S00.00 5/19/00 261 CD 200.00 6/12/00 271 CD 158.39 6/15/00 274 CD 991.60 6/15/00 276 CD 571.00 6/15/00 278 CD 97.73 6/30/00 288 CI) 324.33 PRIOR~LANCE 6,250.67 NET CHANGE 2,843.05 BALANCE 9,093.72 OS 7 1,332.00 PRIOR BALANCE NET CHANGE 1,332.00 BALANCE 1,332.00 6/30/00 172,546.04 DR 172,546.04 CR I~IOR BAIJ~ 8,202.81-* NET CHaNGE * BALANC~ 8,202.81-"* TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT September 2000 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Secretary/Treasurer; Sheri Davis, Stacy Sievek, Judy Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council · This month we received 424 phone calls; 376 - Film Festival, 13- locations information requests, 35 - council business. The TVFC web site. www.temeculafilm.org was activated on September 4, 2000 and by the end of September we had received 378 hits. There was a direct link to the Film Festival web site. Photo and link updates will be a continuous process. Additional information for the new Production Guide was collected during the Film Festival. The new Guide is scheduled to be completed for a major mailing at the end of the year. The Temecula Valley International Film Festival was a huge success over past years. Attendance in less than 3 ½ days was over 3300 people. As the TVFC no longer produces the festival, we are still actively involved in its production. Each member of the Film Council volunteered to chair events or run the offices for the event. The Film Council phone line was used for festival information and was forwarded for live answering at the end of August. The Film Cotmcil provided welcome packets for the filmmakers including local tourism and business information and Temecula filming information with request forms for our TVFC Production Guide. Filming in Temecula Ralph Coleman of Miramax Studios requested locations and information on local lakes with buildings near the water, specifically Elsinore and Skinner for filming in December and January. The Film Council was able to provide information and photographs including additional locations of Vail Lake and Lake Village. During the planning stages and throughout the Film Festival students from Chaparral High School have been filming interviews and production work of the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. They are currently in post-production work on this video film production about the making of a film festival. This is a school project and maybe entered into next year's festival in the Student Film category. Their teacher, Mark Jones, feels that this has been a great experience for the students. Two filmmakers with entrees in this year's festival, Julie Stemock of G-reenstemp Productions and Clifton Huang of Summertime Productions, have scripts they feel can be filmed in Temecula and have asked the Film Council to work with their Artistic Directors to break down the scripts and find possible locations in this area. The Film Council received 4 telephone leads for unique location sites and we have made appointments to shoot these locations in October and add them to our locations file. We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP REAL ESTATE SUCCESSES (The IEEP reports monthly on significant real estate transactions that occurred with or without the assistance of IEEP, in order to provide leads to our members,) Full e Com Inc., a public warehouser and third party logistics firm, recently expanded .within Fonta'na adding an additional 1'50,000 square feet to its operation. This expansion has brought approximately 50 new jobs to the area. Scott Ostlund with Lee & Associates represented the lessee in this $4.6 million deal. Lee's Pottery has relocated its operation from Los Angeles into the Ontario area leasing an 113,200 square foot building. The company signed a five-year lease for a $2.1 million deal. Mike Wolfe of Lee & Associates represented the lessor, Vogul Properties. G&K Services, a uniform laundry company, purchased six acres in Ontario where they plan to build a 130,000 square foot laundry facility. Scott Ostlund of Lee & Associates represented the buyer. Bill Helm and Michael Chavez, also of Lee & Associates, represented the seller, Catellus Development in this $1.3 million deal· Amsino International Inc. has recently expanded.its Inland Empire manufacturing facility of garden supplies adding an additional 24,000 square feet to its operation. The company signed a five-year lease for a $853,000 deal. Mike Wolfe and Joe McKay of Lee & Associates represented the lessor, Vogul Properties. MHC Group Inc. has subleased 60,640 square feet' of industrial space in Rancho Cucamonga from Ronfran, Inc. signing a 22-month lease for a $475,200 deal. Bruce Springer and Ron Washle of Grubb & Ellis Company represented both the sublessor and sublessee in this transaction. California Wire Products Corp.,. a maker of wire cages, fences, and partitions, has Signed a lease for 26,000 square feet adding to existing operation in Corona. The company signed a three-year lease for a $390,000 deal. Ray Schumaker with Lee & Associates represented the lessor and Paul Whitehouse, also with 'Lee & Associates, represented the lessee. BMW has signed a one-year lease for 51,000 square feet of auxiliary warehouse space in Ontario to handle overflow storage of its newly acquired Range Rover division. Don Kazanjian of Lee & Associates represented the lessor, Lombardy Holdings. Mitch Fisher of Collins Commercial represented the lessee in the $226,000 deal. CALENDAR ITEMS To register online for SBDC events: ~n~v. iesb'dc.org ~ October 17: A seminar entitled "The Internet, Your New Business Partner" is being offered from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.' in San Bernardino. Cost is $25. For more information call (909) 781-2345. October 17: This "Payroll Tax News for the New Employer" seminar is presented by the California Employment Development Department and the, IRS, and will be h~ld in Palm Springs from 9 a~m. to 3 p.m., free of charge. For more information call (760) 864-1311. October 19: A representative from Birdwell & Associates will be conducting a seminar entitled "QuickSuccess with QuickBooks Accounting Software" (for beginners) from 9 a.m. to noon in Murdeta. Cost is $25; For more information call (909) 781-2345. October 25: "SBA Loans and How to Ge[ One", this informative seminar will be presented by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) in Victorville from 9 a.m. to noon. Cost is $20. For more information call (760) 951-1592. OCtober 25: A seminar entitled "Payroll Tax News for the New Employer', is being held at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St.; Riverside, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., free of charge. For more information call (909) 781-2345. October 25: The October Membership Luncheon is being held from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Ontario Airport' Marriott, Mountain View Room, in Ontado. For more information call (909) 890-1090 ext. 236. November 7, 14, 21: This three day workshop entitled "Develop Your Plan for. Success" provide~ a solid'basis fqr creating your business plan and is being held at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Cost is $35. For more information call (909) 781-2345. November 8: This one day "Business Planning Workshop" is being held in San Bernardino from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., free of charge. For more information call (909) 781-2345. November 9: The "How to Succeed in a Home*Based Business" seminar is being held in Joshua Tree from 9 a.m. to noon. Cost is $20. For more information call (760) 864-1311. November 9: This one-day "Business Planning Workshop" is being held in Murrieta from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m., free of charge. For more information call (909) 781-2345. November 14: This one day "Business Planning Workshop" is being held in Chino Hills from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., free of charge. For more information call (909) 781-2345. November 16: The city of. Coachella and Coachelia Chamber of Commerce are sponsoring the "AgSum'mitt Il" which will showcase agricultural activities in the Coachella Valley. Cost $25 includes a walking and bus tour, and lunch. For'more information call (760) 398-5110. November 17: The Inland Empire Economic Partnership's Legislative Reception is being held at'the Mission Inn Hotel, 3649 Mission Inn Ave., Riverside from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. For more information call Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090 ext. 236. NOVEMBER MEIVIBERSHIP BREAKFAST The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) in conjunction with California Communities and California Manufacturers & Technology Association Service Corporation will be holding a Membership Breakfast on November 9, 2000, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. at the. University of Phoenix in San Bernardino. Guest speakers will be Rob Braulik, Program Manage~: of California Communities and Brian McMahon, President of California Manufacturers & Technology Association Service Corporation. The presentation will include information on how your manufacturing company can qualify and use tax-exempt bond financing for equipment, land, and building purchases and how your company can access Employment Training Panel (ETP) funds for worker training and retraining. For more information call Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090 ext. 236. BUSINESS INVESTMENT FORUM The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP)and Forbes will be hosting a breakfast and business investment forum to kickoff the May, 2001, .Forbes supplement on the Inland Empire on October 31, 2000, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a:m. at the' Mission Inn in Riverside. Caspar Weinberger, Chairman, Forbes Inc., will give his observations on world affairs ~nd the economy. Also speaking will be Teri Ooms, President and CEO, Inland Empire Economic Partnership.(IEEP). RSVP to Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090 ext. 236 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FORUM The NAIOP and Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) will be hosting an economic development forum On October 26, 2000, from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. at the Sierra Lakes Golf Club in Fontana. A panel of speakers will focus on the Endangered Species Act and transportation and how these two issues impact each other as well as their effects on economic development in the region. Among some of the speakers on the panel will be Congressman Ken Calvert, Michelle Ouellete, Chair of the Natural Resource Practice Group, and Robert Wolf, State Transportation. Cost is $35. For more information call George Roberts, NAIOP, (909) 601-1731; THE FUTURE OF WATER IN THE INLAND EMPIRE The Water Resources Institute will be holding its First Annual Conference at California State University, San Bernardino on October.13, 2000. This is an excellent opportunity for representatives of the local academic and business communities along with elected officials and local water agencies to come together to discuss the state of the Inland Empire's future water supply. Topics of discussion will include: Prop 13, how are water agencies addressing the future?; future demands for water in the Inland Empire, a private industry perspective; and visionary projects, plans for the future. IEEP ACTIVITY REPORT Notable activity in September included nine leads, 264 inquiries, seven prospects and one site tour for a total of 62 leads in various stages of review and consideration by Business Development . . .The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) registered 84 total days of film activity and 142 requests for locations, with eight permits issued in San Bernardino County, one issued in Riverside County, and 13 issued for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), for an economic impact of $3,013,500... The Small Business Development Center (SBDC) reported the creation of nine jobs and the retention of two, for an economic impact of $1,673,500...The SBDC counseled 147 clients for 904 client hours, and conducted nine training events for 296 attendees.., and International Trade recorded one export action for $150,000. WELCOME' NEW PARTNERS IEEP would like to welcome the newest members to the Partnership: · Apple One Employment Services provides solutions to your employment needs, specializing in clerical, administrative, technical, accounting, and light industrial fields. Gregg A. Hassler, Division Vice President, Can be reached at (909) 279-1100. · A-Check America, Inc. provides background and drug screening for your staffing needs and is an affiliate of Apple One Employment Services. Gregg A. Hassler, Vice President, can be reached at (877) 345 2021. · The Inland Valley Development Agency (IVDA) and the San Bernardino International Airport Authority (SBIAA), coJlectively known as the San Bemardino International Airport and Trade Center, are the joint power authorities responsible for the redevelopment of the former Norton Air Force Base into civilian use. T. Milford Harrison, Interim Executive Director, can be reached at (909) 382-4100. FILM UPDATE The Inland Emp!re. Film Commission (IEFC) has just completed the first Digital Film Festival in conjunction with the Big Bear Lake International Film'Festival. The festival was well received playing to packed houses at every vehue. The Temecula Film Festival just completed its sixth annual festival with a film market for buyers being held for several days following the festival. This was another successful event. The IEFC has been busy with'location calls and working with Redline (filming across county lines) with a stay of three weeks, "Jurassic Park" filming in Victorville for one week, and the Academy Award winning company Introvision who has located to Southern Califorr~ia Logistics · Airport (formerly George Air Force Base). In addition to'the ongoing activity of the IEFC they have formed an Industry Task Fome that will meet monthly with industry related companies to market the region as a united effort to the film industry. CAIlFO RNIA 019 LOCATIO, 19.A'WARDS The California On Location Awards is being held on October 29, 2000, at the Queen Mary in' Long Beach~ This "invitation only" event will be honoring the top 300 location professionals inthe industry and is the largest show.of its kind. The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) founded this event six yearn ago and has continued to head up the show with the assistance of the 58 film offices in the state and.the California Film Commission state office. This show will provide direct access to the top location managers, and a few prominent producers and production managers will be speaking on behalf of their commitment to this event. Please send materials for consideration to Diane Evans. Submissions can be sent by e-mail to devans@ieep, com, or by fax to (909) 890-1088. Ail materials should be received by the last Friday of each month. INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP 301 East Vanclerbilt Way, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 890-1090 Fax (909) 890-1088 tooms@ieep.com - www.ieep.com Gloria Wolnick City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ECCtNQMIIC ALLIANCE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Marlene Best Assistant City Manager City of Lake Elsinore Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula Lod Moss Assistant City Manager City of Murrieta Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator October 13, 2000 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE Dear Panners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement. Marketing Plan/Budget: The 2000-2001 MOU has been approved by the cities of Lake EIsinore, Murfieta and Temecula. Currently it is pending County Board approval. Leads: As a result of our marketing efforts, we have had 535 leads to date. Of these leads, 445 were a result of trade shows, 71 were a result of our ad with Expansion Management Magazine, 11 were a result of advertising with KOGO radio in San Diego, six were a result of our commercial and two were leads from other sources. Please note that the above lead totals do not reflect all responses; rather they reflect qualified leads only. Radio: We are currently advertising on three radio stations in the San Diego region. These spots started Monday, October 9. These 30-second spots are aidng on KOGO, KSDO and XTRA AM (XTRA is also broadcast in both Orange and Los Angeles Counties).These commercials will run for four to six weeks along with the television commercial. As explained in the last Partners meeting, the radio spots will be paid on a weekly basis with the opportunity to cancel if we are not satisfied with the lead results. Television: The approved commercials started airing in the San Diego region on Channel 7 dudng "Good Moming America" and during the local news on Channel 15 beginning on September 25, 2000. We will have a total of 192 spots during the hours of 5:30 AM - 8:00 AM, Monday through Friday for six weeks. Due to political campaigning, our spot has been moved from the "Good Moming America" location to a spot during Monday Night Football and during the presidential debates. As a result of this advertising, we have had 6 leads. Advertising The Alliance has placed a % page ad in the September issues of Expansion Management and Medical Device & Diagnostic Imaging magazines. These magazines will be distributed at three trade shows dudng the next month. Expansion Management has a special "location rating" feature story in September and Medical Device & Diagnostic Imaging is doing a feature on Medical Extrusion technology. We have also placed a % page ad in October's issue of Business Xpansion magazine. This particular issue features articles on the ~high tech industries'. Along with this ad, I have negotiated two banners on their web-site, Riverside County has been highlighted with a red- star on the California map (there is only one red star in the state of California), and a link to our web-site has been provided. This can be viewed at www. acn.net. CD-ROM I will present the quotes received for the CD-ROM at the Alliance meeting on October 26~, at 2:00 p.m. In doing this, I can better demonstrate the proposals and answer any questions the partners may have. If you cannot attend this meeting, please contact me to make alternate arrangements. Trade Shows The Alliance has committed to the following trade shows, which I will attend: BioCom - Oct. 30-31 Comdex- Nov. 13-17 MD&M WEST 2001, January 8 - 10, 2001 Direct Mail At the last Alliance meeting, it was determined that we will pursue a direct mail campaign. The first part of this campaign will focus on the Southern Califomia region, with the second to focus on Northern California. I have started work on the design of the postcard and obtaining the mailing lists. Our target industries will include bio-medical and high-tech companies. More specifically, the presidents, owners and CEO's of these companies. The mailer will be released dudng the commercials and radio campaign. I will provide a copy of the postcard at our next meeting. The first round of postcards will be distributed through a mailing house to over 2,842 decision-makers in the bio-medical industry. I am currently obtaining list information for the high-tech manufacturing industry and will have the numbers for that list at our next meeting. On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings: Manufacturer's Council Business Relations Committee EDC Economic Development meetings conceming the Southwest Riverside County region. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909) 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robert Moran Teresa Gallavan S Advertising Supplement~'~eles Tir~', ) r Let's to weekends and holidays. Fe~:~5msring local .... v:n ners f..na C eContent0, Teme a, 92592, Wineries . t0 Saflta O~l~/~ ~ 6 acres of ~fite s~ ~a~. W~ pr~u~ ~mplled by Rob]~ McMacRe~ ~cluda C~do~ay, SanSon outhem California's moderate climate is wonderfully ripe for winemaking--and the leisurely touting and tasting that invari- ably follow. · Whether in the Temeeula Valley, Santa Barbara County or points in between (don. '~ forget Los Angeles), local wineries embrace visitors--from the casual taster to the serious oenophile--with wine tastings, tours and special events. · More than 28 varietals flourish in the Temecula Valley. Northward, Santa Barbara County is regarded ss one of the world's premium wine-producing regions for Chardonnay and Pinot Noir varietals. CALLAWAY VINEYARD & WINERY, 32720 Rancho California Road, Temeeula, CA 92589, (9(~9) 676-4001, (800) 472-2377, httpJAeww. ccd/awayw~ne, com. Features: The 750-acre vineyard produces such wines as Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Chenin Blanc, Merlot, Cabemet Sauvignon, Pinot Gris and Dolcetto. Activities: Tours, wine tasting, special events and private group events. Amenities: A gift shop and a picnic area. Hours: 10:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. daffy, except Christmas, New Year's Day, Thanksgiving and Easter. Tours conducted at 11 a.m., i and 3 p.m. Monday through Friday and on the hour between ll a.m. and 4 p.m. Chenin Blanc, Viognier, Muscat Canelli, Petite Sirah, Meflot, Cabemet Sauvignon and two Zinfandels. Activities: Wine tasting and group tours by appointment. Catering services available for events at hilltop adobe home and pool~ide patio. Amenities: A tasting room, a gift shop and a picnic pavilion by a pond. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Fees: gl for tasting six wines and 50 cents extra for tasting four-star gold 1997 Merlot and 1999 Vingnien FILSINGER VlNEYARD~ & WINERY, 39050 De Portola Road, Temeeula, CA 92592, (909) 6764594, http://wwwfilsinger~ines. eom. Features: The 35-acre vineyard produces such wines as Chardonnay, Fum6 Blanc, G, ewurztram2ner, Johannisberg Pdesfing, Sauvignon Blanc, Cabemet Sanvignon, Gamay, Nebbiolo and white Zinfandel. Activities: W'me tasting and tours by appointment. Amenities: A tasting room, meeting facilities for up to 40 people and a picnic area. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday year-round, noon to 4 p.m. Fridays during the summer and by appointment. Fee: gl tasting fee. HART WINERY, 41300 Avenida Biona, ?emeeula, CA 92593, (909) 676-6300. Features: The 11-acre vineyard produces 4,000 eases annually. Wine seleerions include Viognier, Fum6 Blanc, Grenaehe RosC Syrah, Mourvedre, Metier, Barbera, Zinfandel, Cabemet Franc and Cuvde du Soleil. Activities: W'me tasting, tours upon request and occasional wine and food events. AmenRles: A tasting area and picnic facilities. Hours: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. daily. Fees: $2 tasting fee inehides a souvenir glass. KEYWAYS WINERY & VINEYARDS, 37338 De Portola Road, Temeeula, CA 92592, (909) 302-7888. Features: The 27-acre vineyard produces about 3,700 eases per year, including such wines as barrel-fermented Chardonnay, Vingnier, Cabemet Sanvignon, Sanvignon Blanc and white ginfandel. Activitle~ Wine tasting and catering. Amenities: A tasting room and a picnic area. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Fees: $2 tasting fee. NIAURICE CAR'RIE VINEYARD & WINERY, 34225 Rancho California Road, ?emeeula, CA 92592, (909) 676-1711. Features: The 120- acre vineyard produces 25,000 eases annually, including such wines as Cabemet Sanvignon, Temecula Yalie¥ vineyard Los Angeles County ANTEII)PE V~ WINERY, 42041 20th St. West, Lancaster, CA 93534, (661) 722-0145, hwp://www, avwiner~com. Features: Winery has 10 acres of Cabemet Sauvignon, Merlot, Sangiovese and Zinfandel vines in the Antelope Valley. Activities: Wine tasting and tours. Amenities: A gourmet food and gift shop, picnic grounds and a gazebo. Hours: 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. daffy. Fees: $2 tasting charge can be applied to a purchase. SAN ANTONIO WINERY, 737 Lamar St., Los Angeles, CA 90031, (323) 223-1401, http:// w~w. ribofiwines, com. Features: The winery was founded in 1917 by Santo Cambianica and has been in continuous operation for more than 80 years. The Los Angeles site is used for white wine fermentation in stainless- steel tanks and oak barrels. Activities: Daffy guided winery tours and wine tasting. amesltles: The Maddalena Restaurant. Hours: Tours given on the hour between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. daily. Restaurant is open from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Fees: None. B~JLY I/INEYARO St WINgRY, 33833 Rancho California Road (tasting room), Temecula, CA, (909) 695-1895. Features: The 63-acre vineyard, located elsewhere in Temecula, produces 3,500 cases annually, including Chardonnay, white Riesling, Cabemet Blanc and Muscat Blanc. activities: Wine tasting. amenities: A tasting room, a deli and a picnic area. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily, lees: $5 tasting charge for five wines. Advertising Supplement of the Los Angeles Times Merlot, Pinot Noir, Nebbiolo-Syrah, Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Chenin Blanc, Cabernet Blanc, white Zinfandel, Johannisberg Riesling, Muscat Canelli, Nouveau Gamay Beaujolais and a late-harvest dessert wine. Activities: Wine tasting and tou?s. Amenities: A tasting room, a gift shop and a picnic area. Fresh baked bread offered on Saturdays and Sundays. Prepackaged deli items also available. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daffy, except Thanksgiving and Christmas. Fees: None. MOUNT PAl. OMAR WINERY, 33820 Rancho California Road, Temeeula, CA 92591, (909) 676-5047, http.J/www, nmunt paloma~com. Features: The 173-acre estate includes 93 acres of vineyards and 31 acres of citrus trees and concert and picnic grounds. Winery produces 14,000 cases almuaffy, including Sangiovese, Syrah, Cortese, Carignane, Chardunnay, Meflot, Cabernet Sauvignon, Riesling, Moscato and Port Cream Sherry. Activities: Wine tasting, guided tours, a Mother's Day picnic, blues barbecues in the spring and fall, candlelight barrel tasting in December and winemaker dinners. Amenities: A tasting room, a gift shop, a deli and several picnic areas. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Tours conducted at 1:30 and 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, plus at 11:30 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday. Fees: Tasting charge of $3 for six wines or S5 for six wines includes a souvenir wine glass. SANTA MARGARITA WINERY, 33490 Madera De Playa, Temeeula, CA 92592, (909) 676-4431. Features: The 4-acre vineyard produces about 1,000 cases annually, including Cabemet Sauvignon and a Sauviguon Blanc/semillon blend. Activities: Wine tasting. Hours: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays from November through July (or when stock se0s out). Fess: None. b-~l~Y g~.L~R$, 33515 Rancho California Road, Temecula, CA 92591, http://~'ww. stuartcellars, com. Features: The 35-acre vineyard produces 6,000 cases a year, including such wines as Chardonnay, Vingnier and a vintage Zinfandel port. AgtlvRles: Wine tasting and quarterly special events. Amenitles: A tasting room, a gift shop and a hilltop picnic area. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Fees: $4 tasting fee for five wines. TI~I£gUI~ gR£b~' WIHER¥, 40620 Calle Contento, Temecula, CA, 92591, (909) 676- 8231. Features: The 12¥2-acre vineyard produces 3,500 cases annually, including Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay, Riesling, Cabemet Blanc, Cabemet Sanvignon, Merlot, Nebbiolo and a late-harvest Sauvignon Blanc. p.m. daily. Fees: $4 tasting fee for five wines includes a souvenir glass. 'ffIORNTOH WIN£~Y, 32575 Rancho California Road, Temecula, CA 92591, (909) 699-0099. Callaway Vineyard & Winery 30,000 eases annually, including such wines as a v~ntage Blanc de Blanc and Brat Reserve, Barbera, Carignane, Chardonnay, Nebbiolo, Pinot Blanc, Pinot Noir, Zinfandel and Viognien Activities: Wine tasting, tours, jazz concerts and winemaker dinners. Site and catering available for banquets, conferences, weddings and parties. Amenities: A champagne and wine-tasting lounge, a gift shop and a restaurant. Hours: Lounge open from 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. daily. Touts conducted on the hour between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekends. Restaurant is open from 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. daffy, except Monday evenings. Fees: $7 tasting fee for four wines. V,~aN Rolatfla. VIN£YARD & WI Nl-~X~t', 34567 Rancho California Road, Temeeula, CA 92591, (909) 699-6961. Features: The 120-acre vineyard produces 6,000 eases annually, including Chardonnay, Fum~ Blanc, Pinot Blanc, Merlot, Mourvedre, Cabernet Sauvignon, white Zinfandel and Muscat Canelli. Activities: Wine tasting. AmenRles: A tasting room, a gift shop, deli foods, a picnic area and a playground. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. daffy, except Thanksgiving and Christmas. Fees: $2 tasting fee for a white-wine menu or $5 for a red-wine menu or a combination of the two. A souvenir wine glass is included. San Diego County ORFILA VINEYARDS, 13455 San Pasqual Road~ Eseondldo, CA 92025, (800) 868-9463. Features: Winery located in 10,000-acre cultural and natural habitat in the San Pasqual Valley. Wines include Ghardonnay, Zinfandallo, Vingnier, Merlot and Gerwurztraminer. Activities: Wine tasting mad self-guided and guided tours. Amenities: A picnic area beneath grape arbors overlooking the vineyards and San Pasqual Valley, a gift shop and a tasting room. Hours: 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. daffy, except New Year's Day, the Fourth of July, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Closes at 5 p.m. during January and February. Guided tours at 2 p.m. Fees: $3 tasting fee includes slx wines and a souvenir glass. Santa Barbara County BECKMER VINEYARDS, 2670 Ontiveros Road, Los Ollvos, CA 93441, (805) 688-8664, http:// ~;~.§eckn~o:nv~neyards. com. Features: Parisima Mountain, its vineyard in Ballard Canyon, is dedicated to Rhone-style grape varietals. Amealtles: Three gazebos near a duck pond for picnicking. Activities: Wine tasting. Hours: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily from June through Sept. 15 and 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Friday through Sunday from Sept. 16 through May. Fees: $2.50 tasting fee. 2205 Alamo Pintado Road, Solvang, CA 93463, (805) 686-9922, http://www. blackjackranch, com. Features: The estate vineyard is planted with rare clones of Chardonnay, Cabernet Franc, Syrah, Petit Verdot and Merlot. Amenities: Rustic tasting room constructed from materials salvaged from buildings that previously existed on the ranch. The tasting room bar comes from one of the bowling affey lanes salvaged from the old Solvang Bowling Alley. Activities: Wine tasting. Hours: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Friday through Sunday. Fees: $5 tasting fee. ~£ B,~.hll~R I/IHEYAJ~D, 2401 Refugio Road, Los Olives, CA 93441, (800) 970-9979, http.J/www, brande~ com. Features: The L [ \ Advertising Supplement of the Los Angeles Times stores and antiques and collectible shops. The Fullerton Market and Farmers Market is held from 4 to 9 p.m. every Thursday. Hours: Vary by establishment. Parking: Free throughout downtown area. IRVINE SPECTRUM CENTER, 71 Fortune Drive, (949) 789-9180, http://www, ir~inespectrumcenteneorn. Features: Movie theaters, an IMAX 3-D theater, GameWorks entertainment center, Dave & Busters, The Improv comedy club, shops, bazaars and restaurants. Outdoor concerts held. Hours: Most stores open from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. daily. Parking: Free. Valet parking also available. ~ TOWN ORANGE PLAZA DISTRICT, Chapman and Glassell avenues, Orange, (714) 284-7278. Features: Called the Orange Circle by locals, with most buildings dating back to the late 1800s. There are 40 antiques shops and businesses; 12 restaurants, including an old- fashioned soda fountain and lunch counter; three tea rooms; and a variety of gift shops. P.J.'s Abbey, a Baptist church from the 1800s, is now a restaurant and a favorite for Sunday brunch. Hours: 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily. Parking: Free parking in lots and on the street. Riverside ~nty El. PASEO DRIVE, between Monterey and Portola avenues, Palm Desert, (800) 967-3767 (Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority), htrp://~.elpaseodrive. com. Features: Upscale clothing and jewelry stores, art galleries and an eclectic mix of restaurants from Tommy Bahamas to California Pizza Kitchen. Hours: 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. daily. Some shops open laten ParRing: Metered and free eurbside parking. PAlM CANYON DRIVE, between Amado and Ramon roads, Palm Springs, (800) 967-3767 (Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority), htqo://~.desert- resorts, com. Features: Nightclubs, restaurants and specialty shops. Streets closed to traffic between 6 and 10 p.m. Thursdays for the Palm Springs VillageFest featuring vendors, music and crafts. Hours: Vary by establishment. Parking: Metered parking and some free parking behind shops. IEMECUI.A, Old Town Front Street 2alifomia Road, Temeeula, (909) 767-5090, http'J/~rww, temecula.org. Features: Antiques and gift shops and historical buildings (such as the First National Bank of Temeeula that is now a Mexican restaurant, The Bank). Still has look of frontier town. A farmers' market is held from 8 a.m. to noon Saturdays and stagecoach rides are offered on weekends. Hours: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Parking: Free street and lot parking. UNIVERSITY VILLAGE, 1201 University Ave. (near UC Riverside), Riverside, (909) 788-1400, http:/Ac(ma, uvriverside. eom. Features: Urban boulevard populated by restaurants, ca~es, a Starbucks, Ben &Jerry's, a 10-screen movie theater and retail shops. Hours: 5 a.m. to 2 a.m. with hours varying by business. Parking: Free with validation. Ventura County CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, off the Ventura Freeway (101), (805) 9854852, http://~axow. ctmnnelislandsharl~.org. Features: Shops, restaurants, boating, sport fishing, island excursions, maritime museum and a weekly farmers' market. Hours: The harbor is open 24 hours. Hours for recreation, shops and museum vary. Parking: Free. FISHERMAN'S WHARF, comer of Channel Islands Boulevard and South Victoria Avenue, Oxnard, (800) 269-6273, (805) 385-7545. Features: Harbor excursions, live music in an outdoor setting, shops and restaurants. Hours: Vary by establishment. Parking: Free. VENTURA HARBOR VILLAGE, Harbor Blvd. and Spinnaker Dh, Ventura, (805) 644-0169, http://~, venmraharborviffoge, com. Features: Forty specialty shops, waterfront restaurants and cafes, a fish market, an ice cream parlor and a 36-horse carousel. Harbor cruises and paddle boat and kayak rentals are available. Art exhibits and concerts are held on weekends. Hours: Generally 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. weekdays and 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. weekends. Parking: Free. · Advertising Supplement of the Los Angeles Times Public houm: 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. Monday; 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. and 8:15 to 9:45 p.m. Wednesday; 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. Friday; 2:30 to 4:30 p.m. and 8 to 10 p.re. Saturday; and 2:30 to 4:30 p.m. Sunday. Fe~: g6 for 17 years and older and g5 for under 17.8kate rental is S3. Fountain Valrey Skating Center gOUNTAIN VALLEY SKATING C~NII~, 9105 Reereation Circle, Fountain Valley, C~ 92708 (714) 847-0022, http:/Awww.~$kate.com. Features: A fully enclosed roller and in-line skating arena. Actlvltle~ Roller skating lessons for all ages, competitive skating, artistic skating, adults' nights, group parties, birthday parties and holiday events. ~menlllee: A skate shop and a snack bar. Public hours: 6 to 8:30 p.m. Tuesday; 6 to 8 p.m. Wednesday; 6 to 8:30 p.m. and 8:30 to 11 p.m. (adults only) Thursday; 3:30 p.m. to midnight Friday; 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday; and 6 to 8:30 p.m. Sunday. ~lmlsalon: g4.50 or g5.50, depending on time of day. Skate rental is gl.50. IC~ CR~..gt, 2701 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, C,A 92626, (714) 979-8880, http:/Aeww. /eecha&t. eom~ Features: A fully enclosed ice skatin~ arella. Activities: Public ice skating, figure skating lessons, basic h~key lessons and free weekend introdantory skating lessons. Amenltle~ A pro shop and vending machines. Public hours: 1 to 4 p.m. Monday; i to 5 p.m. Tuesday and Thursday; I to 5 p.m. and 7:45 to 10 p.m. Wednesday; i to 4 p.m. and 8 to 10 p.m. l~iday; 2 to 4 p.m. and 8 to 10 p.m. Saturday; and 2 to 4 p.m. Sunday. Fee~ g5.50 daffy, except for Wednesday when rate is g5 from 7:45 to 10 p.m. Skate rental is ~2.50. Free rentals offered Thursday nights. IRVINE ICE ARENA, 3400 Mlahelsun Drive, Irvine, GA 92612, (949) 262-0907, htrp'J/w~w.i~o/ne/ce, co~ Features: The 2-yeer-old, 38,000-squaredoot facility is a fully enclosed ice skating arena. ActMtle~ Adult and youth league hockey, broom bali, figure skating lessons, a fitness program, freestyle time and pickup hockey. Amenltle~ Pizza Hut Express, a pro shop, a video arcade and a Btness center next to the ice. Public hoer~ The facility is open from 4:45 a.m. to midnight daffy, and there are public sessions daily. Sahedtdes are published weekly. Fees: Skate rental is SKATE ZOfl~ 16091 Gothard St., Huntington Beach, GA 92647, (714) 842-9143. Features: The fully enclosed facility features both relier and ice skating rinks. Activities: Ice and roller skating groups for youths and adults and private parties. Amenltlee: A video arcade, a snack bar and a dance room. Pul011c hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday and Tuesday; 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Wednesday and Thumday; 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and 8:30 to 10:30 p.m. Friday; 12:30 to 3 p.m. and 8:30 to 10:30 p.m. Saturday; and 12:30 to 3 p.m. Sunday. Fees: g5 for roller skating, g6 for ice skating and g7 for both. Skate rentals are g2 for roller skates, g2.50 for figure skates and g3.50 for hcekay skates. [ VANS 8KATE PARK, The Block ~ at Orange, 20 City Blvd. West, Building A, Suite 2, Orange, GA 92868, (714) 769-3800. Features: The indoor-outdoor skateboarding park features a replica of the original Combi pool, leeated at the Upland Pipeline skate park during the early 1980s. There is an intermediate bowl, a peewee area a mini ramp, an outdoor street course and a vertical ramp. Activities: Special events thronghout the year. Amanlfles: Vending machines. Food and services are available in the adjoining mall. public hours: Two-hour skate sessions begin at 10 a.m. and end at 11 p.m. daffy. Foes: gll to gl4 for a two-hour session, depending on the time, day of the week or holiday schedule. Safety gear rentals are g2 for elbow pads and knee pads and g3 for a helmet; g5 covers elbow pads, knee pads and helmet rentals. Rivemide Count~ TEMECULA ,SKATE PARK, 42569 Margarita Road ~ (Rancho California Sports Park complex), ~-~'emeeula, GA 92590, (909) 695-1409 (recorded information), · http'.//www, ei. ternecula, cc~ tm/ recreate/parks. Features: The lighted, 1-acre park has a concrete in-line skating and skateboarding facility, including a bowl with a pyramid, euths, ramps, stairs and a 20-feet hand mil, and a separate roIler-heekay arena. Actlvltlee: Public skating, youth heekay league programs and roller hockey tournaments. Amenities: A hot dog vendor. Public hours: 4 to 9:30 p.m. weekdays, 10 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. Saturday and 1 to 6:30 p.m. Sunday, with additional hours and sessions available dndng the summer and on holidays and on some Tuesdays and Thmsdays. Fees: g2 to g5. Rentals are g5 for a helmet, hand and wrist gearda~ and knee and elbow pads. 11~£ BRICk'YARD ~XATE~ffitK, 21 W. Stuart Ave., Rediands, GA 92374, (909) 792-5093, The 21,000-square-foot skateboard and in-line skate park has two 40-foot-wide mini ramps, a 6-foot-deep bowl and an outdoor street course with banked ramps, rails, launches, quarter pipes, pyramids and vertical wafts. Activities: Public sessions, lessons and special programs. Amenities: A snack area, leekers, a shop and a party room. Public hours: 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. and 7:30 to 10 p.m. Tuesday through Friday; noon to 3 p.m., 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. and 7 to 10 p.m. Saturday; and noon to 3 p.m. and 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. Sunday. Fees: g7 Tuesday, g8 Wednesday and Thursday and gl0 Saturday and Sunday. ICEOPLEX ICE ~ 27307 State Highway 189, Blue Jay, GA 92317, (909) 336-2111, http-./~w./ceop/ex, com. Features: The open-air facility is located in a pine forest in the Big Bear area. The rink has a 360-degree jump harness. Activities: Public skating sessions, hockey, Ice Castle Theater productions, broom ball, hockey and fi~ure skating schools and youth hockey programs. Ameaitles: Grandstand seating, locker rooms with showers, a viewing area with a fireplace, a robotic lighting system and a computerized scoreboard. Public hours: 2 to 5:15 p.m. Monday, 2 to 5 p.m. Tuesday, 2 to 5:15 p.m. Wednesday, 2 to 4:30 p.m. Thursday, 2 to 5:15 p.m. and 8 to 10:30 p.m. Friday, 9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. and I to 4:30 p.m. Saturday and 1 to 4 p.m. Sunday. F~: $8 for general admission and $7 for 12 and under. Fees include skate rentals. Ventura County SKA~IAB, 4226 Valley Fair St., Simi Valley, CA 93063, (805) 578-0040, http:/Au~w. skatelab, com. Features: An indoor skateboard and in-line skating facility featuring a 14,000- square-foot street saetion, one large bowl and two pipes. Activities: 8ummar camp activities, skateboard and in-line skating classes, parties and special events. Amenities: A museum, a pro shop, a lounge, snacks and beverages. Public hours: 7 to 10 p.m. Monday; 3 to 6 p.m. and 7 to 10 p.m. Tuesday through Friday; 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (beginners), 1:30 to 4:30 p.m., 5:30 to 8:30 p.m. and 8:30 to 10 p.m. Saturday; and 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (beginners), 2 to 5 p.m. and 5 to 7 p.m. Sunday. Fees: g8 Monday through Thursday and gl0 Friday through Sunday. Safety gear rentals include g2 for helmets, g2 for elbow pads, g2 for knee pads or g5 for the whole set. · /4~TE gl~-r, 1990-B Knoll Drive, Ventare, CA 93003, (888) 857-5283), http../Aw,w~.skatestreetusa, com. Fsature~ The indoor eemplex for skatebeardin~ in-line skating and BMX riding features a beginners' area, a wave wall, a ~roller co~ster,' a "waterfall," a vertical ramp, a bowl and a ~mountain" are~ Skatoboardin~ and skating sessions are together ,~gdvltiee: Contests, a skate camp, parties and demonstrations. Amonltie~ Vending maehine~ and a shop. PUblic hours: Noon to 10 p.m. daffy, with additional hours in the surmner and on certain holidays. Fees: gl2 for general admission or g7 for the last 90 minutes of a sesaion. Pad and helmet rentals are g2 to gS. · Advertising Supplement of the Los Angeles Times practice facility, a clubhouse, a restaurant, a pro shop and a banquet facility. Hours: 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. daily. Reservations are accepted up to 60 days in advance. Green fees: $45 to $115 for the long course and $18 to $55 for the short eourseJ Cart fees: Included with green fees, Dross code: Appropriate golf attire is required. DESERT DUNES GOLF CLUB, 19300 Palm Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240, (760) 251-5367. Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 73.8, slope of 142, yardage of 6,876 and par 72. It was designed by Robert Trent Jones Jr. Services: Club rentals, lessons, a pro shop, a driving range, a putting green and a snack bar. Hours: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily. Green and cart ~es: Course requests calls for current pricas. Dress code: No denim is allowed. Shirts with collars are required. DIAMOND VALLFY GOLF CLUB, 31220 Sage Road, Hemet, CA 92543, (909) 767-0828. Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 71.8, slope of 131, yardage of 6,452 and par 72. It was designed by Art Magnusen. Services: A pitching area, a putting green, a driving range, a pro shop and a snack bar. Hoers: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. daffy. Reservations are required up to a week in advance. G~en fees: $30 weekdays and $40 weekends. Afrer 1:30 p.m., fees are $25 with a cart weekdays and $27 to walk and $33 with cart weekends. Cart fees: $11 during regular hours daily. Dress code: Soft spike shoes and collared shirts are required. No denim is allowed. KIDDEI~VAU. EYGOLFCLUB,10CIubhouse . I Drive, Norco, CA 91760, (909) 737-1010, ~ http://~w, hiddenvalleygolfcom. Course:'-7~ Eighteen holes, rating of 73.3, slope of 140, ' I yardage of 6,721 and par 72. It was designed by Casey O'Callaghan. Services: Club rentals, lessons, a pro shop, a driving range, a putting green and a restaurant. Hours: Sunrise to sundown daily. Reservations are recommended 14 days in advance. Green fees: $70 and g50 (twilight) Monday through Thursday, 880 and g60 (twilight) Friday, and 895 and 870 (twilight) weekends and holidays. Carl fees: Included with green fees. Dress code: NTo denim is allowed. INDIAN HILLS GOLF CUJB, 5700 Clubhouse Drive, Riverside, CA 92509, (909) 360-2090, http'.//w~w, indianhillsgolfcorr~ Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 70, slope of 126, yardage of 6,104 and per 70. Servicas: Club rentals, PGA lessons, a pro shop, a putting green, a snack bar, a lounge and banquet facilities. Hours: 6 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. daily. Reservations are recommended up to a week in advance. Green fees: $27 weekdays and $45 weekends and holidays. Cart fees: Included in green fees. Dress code: No tank tops are allowed. Collared shirts are required. MENIFEE lAKES COUNTRY CLUB, 29875 Menifee Lakes Drive, Menffee, CA 92584, ' (909) 672-3090. Courses: Three nine-hole anurses. The Lakes/Falls course hes a rating of 70.7, slope of 121, yardage of 6,435 and par 72. The Palms/Falls course has a rating of 71.1, slope of 122, yardage of 6,503 and par 72. The Palms/Lakes course has a rating of 70.5, slope of 120, yardage of 6,892 and par 72. They were designed by Ted Robinson. Services: A pro shop, a driving range, lessons, a practice green, a restaurant and a bar. Hours: 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. daily. Reservations are recommended at least a week in advance. Green fees: g35 weekdays and $58 weekends. Twilight fees are $24 weekdays and $34 weekends. ~ari fees: Included with green fees. Dress code: Collared shirts are required. No denim or cutoffs are allowed. MORE~IO YAU. EY RANCH GOLF CLUB, 28095 John E Kennedy Drive, Moreno Valley, CA 92555, (909) 924-4444, http:/~.mvn, com. Courses: Three nine-hole courses. The Mountain/Lake course has a rating of 71.1, slope of 131, yardage of 6,361 and par 72. The Lake/Valley course has a rating of 71.5, slope SEVEN HILTS GOLF CLUB, 1537 S. Lyon Ave., Hemet, CA 92545, (909) 925-4815. Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 70.2, slope of 116, yardage of 6,557 and par 72. Services: A lighted driving range, a clubhouse, a pro shop and golf instruction. Hours: Sunrise to sunset daily. Green fees: $24 and $18 (for seniors S5 and older) weekdays and $28 weekends and holidays. Cart fees: $10 per person. ~Valking is allowed. Dines code: None. ~IECULA CREEK INN, 44501 Rainbow ~anyon Road, Temeeula, CA, 92592 (909) 694-1000. Courses: Three nine-hole courses. The Creek/Oaks course has a rating of 72.2, slope of 126, y~ of 6,757 and par 72. The Cmek/Stonehanse course has a rating of 71.4, slope of 129, yardage of 6,580 and par 72. The Oaks/Stonehouse course has a rating of 72.2, slope of 128, yardage of 6,649 and par 72. They were designed by Dick Rossen and Ted Robinson. Hours: Dawn to dusk dally. fees: $42 Monday through Thursday, $45 Friday and $65 Somrday, Sunday and holidays. Cart fees: Included with green fees. Dress code: Collared shirts are required. R~DHAWK GOLF CLUB, 45100 Redhawk Parkway, Temecula, CA '92592, (909) 302-3850, http..//www. redhawk~oO~xourse, com. Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 72.7, slope of 137, yardage of 6,755 and par 72. Services: Club rentals, lessons, a driving range and a putting green. Hours: 6:30 a.m. to sunset daily. Reservations are recommended a week in advance. Green fees: gSO Monday through Thursday, $60 Friday and $80 Saturday, Stmday and holidays for nonresidents. Cart f~s: Included in green fees. Dress code: Collared shirts and soft spikes are required. No denim or tank tops are al/owed. Only four-inch inseam shorts are allowed. of 129, yardage of 6,453 and par 72. The Green fees: $50 weekdays and $80 weekends. Valley/Mountain course has a rating of 71.i, ] Cart fees: Included with'green fees. Drsss slope of130, yardsgeof6,372andpar72. The[ code: Spikeless shoes are requirad. courses were designed by Pete Dye. It was the | TEMEK site of the Nike Tour Inland Empire Open ~ IT1 U HILLS GOLF CLUB, 41587 Temeku from 1994 to 1999. Services: Club rentals, ~1~~:/)rive, Temeenla, CA 92591, (909) 693-1440, a lighted driving range, a putting green, a '7~,Ext. 233, (800) 674-9948, htrp~'/w, my~. practice bunker, a restaurant and banquet I t_~.n...elink, com/temeku. Course: Eighteen holes facilities. Hours: 6 a m toTpm dally Green ratingof71.4, slopeof129, yardage of 6,522 and par 72 (from gold tees). Designed by Ted Robinson, the course has 59 sand traps and five lakes. Services: A driving range, a putting green, club rent~ls, lessons, a pro shop and banquet facdities. Hours: 6 a.m. to dark daily. Reservations are recommended a week in Los Serranos Golf Course in C~ino Hills advance. Green fees: $43 Monday through Thursday, 853 Friday and $68 weekends and holidays. Cart fees: Included with green fees. Dress code: Collared shirts and soft spikes are required. No denim is allowed. BlUE SKIES GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, 55-100 Martinez 'hail, Yucca Valley, CA, 92284, (760) 365-0111, (800) 877-1412. Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 69.8, slope of 115, yardage of 6,400 and par 71. Services: A driving range, PGA lessons, a restaurant and a ban Hours: Sunrise to sunset daily. Green fees: 815 Monday through Thursday and g20 Friday, through Sunday and holidays. Cart i~s: 825 per person Monday through Thursday and 830 per person Friday through Sunday and holidays. Dress code: No spikes are allowed. EMPIRE LAKES GOLF COURSE, 11015 6th St., Rancho Cueamonga, CA 91730, (909) 481-6663, htrp://zo~.empirelakes. eom. Course: Eighteen holes, rating of 71.9, slope of 130, yardage of 6,628 and par 72. Designed by Arnold Palmer, the links-style course has water on six holes. Services: A lighted driving range, club rentals, a pro shop, a PGA teaching pro, a restaurant and a snack bar. Hours: Sunrise to sunset dally. Green fees: $55 Monday through Thursday and 880 Yriday through Sunday. Cart fees: Included with green fees. Dross code: Collared shirts are required. No denim is allowed. Advertising Supplement of the Los Angeles Times Look! Up in the sky! Opportunities abound for sailing high into adventure compiled by Sue Osbome ~ f you want to feel as free as a bird, the Southland offers ~ii many opportunities to take to the skies, o Parasailing ~ will get you soaring over water. Other options include hot air balloon rides and glider flights. For the more adventurous, there is skydiving---complete with instructions for first-timers. · Or you can step back in time by taking a scenic ride in an open cockpit biplane. Those who crave war action can get their fill from participating in aerial combat missions, o So get ready to soar. Los Angeles County ISLAND EXPRESS HEUCO~.'i r.t~, 1175 Queens Highway South, Long Beach, CA 90802, (800) 228-2566. Activities: Helicopter tours, 15- minute rides to Catalina Island and charter trips in Aerospotfle A-Star helicopters. Hours: 8 a.m. to dusk daffy. Reservations required. Fees: Trips to Catalina are $68.08 one way and $125.40 round-trip. The Day in Paradise package includes round-trip to Catalina, taxi and two island tours for $147. A scenic 35- minute tour over LA. is $425 for up to six. OR=SHORE WATERSPORTS, 128 E. Shoreline Drive, Long Beach, CA 90802, (562) 436- 1996. Activities: Parasailing using 28-foot Nordic Winch direct parasail boat. Hours: 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. daily or by appointment. Reservations required for para.sailing. Fees: $49 for parasailing, including wetsuits. WINDSPOR~S, 16145 Victory Blvd., Van Nuys, CA 91406, (818) 988-0111, http:/Avww. windsports, com. Activities: Hang gliding. Hours: 11 a.m. to sunset daily. Reservations recommended. Fees: Introductory lesson starts at $99. Orange County AIR COMBAT USA, 230 N. Dale Place, [ Fullerton, CA 92833, (800) 522-7590, http:/www, aircombatusa, com. Activities: ~_~ One-hour air combat flight mission with an instructor against an opponent, using SIAI Marehetti SF260 aircraft. Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Reservations required. Fees: Courses start at $795 and include fli~t gear. LENAIR AVIATION INC., 19531 Campus Drive, Suite 5, Santa Ana, CA 92782, (949) 756- 8546, (877) 536-2471, http:/Awww, lenair- aviation, com. Activities: Airplane rides, sightseeing, aerial photography, charters and flight instruction in a variety of aircraft. Hours: Flights can Be scheduled at client's request. Office hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. weekdays and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekends. Reservations required. Fees: Rates based on flight time and aircraft type. SUNRISE AVIATION, 19531 Campus Drive, Suite 7, Santa Arm, CA 92707,(800) 717-4200, http ://www. sunriseaviation, com. ActiYRles: Acrobatic rides and demonstrations in Extra 300 and Pitts S2B. Flight training available. Hours: Flights ean be arranged at client's request. Office open from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. daffy. Reservations required. Fees: A 45-minute acrobatic ride ranges from $95 to $200. Riverside County A GRAPE ESCAPE BALLOON ADVENIURE, 25225 Corte Sandia, Murrieta, CA 92563, ~/?00) 965-2122, http~//~.m~.a~O, rapeescape. com. ActMUes: Hot-air balloon rides over Temecula Valley wine country or the Del Mar area. Hours: Sunrise flights over Temeeula and sunset flights over Del Mar. Office open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Reservations required. Fees: $130 per person for one-hour flight. I~IF~J~ RJGI~'$, 5091 Solano Ave., Napa, CA 94558 (corporate office), (800) 933-5628, httpf/www, dreamflights, cora. Activities: Hot air balloon rides over Palm Desert area. Hours: Sunrise and sunset from October through May. Reservations required. Fees: One-hour flight is $145 per person. FANTASY BALLOON FLIGHTS, 74181 Parosella St., Palm Desert, CA 92260, (800) 462-2683, (760) 568-0997, http..//www. fantasyballoonflights, com. Activities: Hot air balloon flights over Palm Springs resort area, Temeeula wine country and coasdine over De] Mar. Charters also available. Hours: Sunrise and sunset daffy. Reservations required. Fees: From $75 to $145 per por~on for 30-minute to one-hour flight. JIM WALLACE SKYDMNG INC., 2091 Goetz Road, Perils, CA 92507, (800) 795*3483, http'J/www.jimwallacesAydiving, com. Activities: Skydiving training and jumps. Hours: 9 a.m. to sunset weekdays and 7:30 a.m. to sunset weekends. Reservations required. Fees: Tandem jump with an instructor is $]99. Video and still photos of jump are $75. PARACHUTES OVER PALM SPRINGS, 74-320 Magnesia Falls//4, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (800) 535-5867, http'//www./etsgoskydiving. com. Activities: Tandem free-full skydiving from a Cessna 182 after training with a certified instructor. Hours: Daily by appoint- ment between November through April. Fees: $170 for one; $160 each for.two people; and $150 each for three or more people. PERRIS VALLEY SKYDIVING SCHOOL, 2091 Goetz Road, Pen-is, CA 92570, (800) 75%3483, http:/Avww, skydiveperns. com. ActivRies: Skydiving training and jumps, using Super Otters and Skyvan airesaft. Hours: Sunrise to sunset daffy. Reservations required. lees: First-time eourse~tandern jump is $199. Experienced skydivers charged ~17 per jump. SAILPLANE ENTERPRISES INC., 4655 Whittier Ave., Hemet, CA 92545, (909) 658-6577, http://members, ool.com/soarsocalZ Activities: Glider rides, lessons and rentals. Hour~ 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily from Dec, emBer through May and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Wednesday through SAN DIE La Jolla and Orange c6qnty Seeing San Diego SYCUAN CASINO 5469 Dehesa Road, El Caion/(619) 445-6002 or (800) 279-2826 Tucked in the foothills of San Diego is a place of adventure. Sycuan Casino offers high-stakes bingo, a 24-hour card room, off-track wagering, slot machines and three restaurants. Enjoy all of your fa- vorite card games such as Sycuan 21 (blackjack}, poker and pal gow. Play bingo daily, from 9:30 a.m. to 11 p.m. for your chance at spectacular winnings. Or try your luck at hundreds of slot chines. Sycuan also offers complimentary bus service and special group discounts. TEMECULA VISITOR INFORMATION (909) 676-5090 www. temecula.org Less than an hour from San Diego is the beautiful Temecula Valley, with picturesque wineries, hot-air ballooning, a wide variety of shopping venues and championship golf. The Valley's rolling hills are home to 15 wineries that produce award-winning pre- mium wines and offer daily tours, wine- tastings and sumptuous food. Temecula's Old West heritage comes alive in Historic Old Town, with the new Temecula Valley Museum and antique shops sharing the rustic streets with authentic 1890s build- ings. The Valley has seven outstanding golf courses with year-round play. UNIVERSAL STUDIOS HOLLYWOOD Hollywood Fwy. at Lankershirn Blvd., Universal City/(818) 622-3801 Universal Studios Hollywood® Theme Park, where the greatest moments from movies and television come to life, putting you in all the excitement -- like the reality-shattering, all-new Terminator 2: 3D, starring the cast of Terminator 2. Feel the thrill of riding to the moon with E.T., or seeing a live sea war in Waterworld. Speed through time on Back To The Future...The Ride,® or go Totally Nickelodeon,® in the place where kids rule. Have your worst nightmare come true on Jurassic Park® -- The Ride. Only at Universal Studios Hollywood. "1 had three hotdogs, two shakes and twelve cookies... my mom says I can't go in the water until l'm 47." SD 83 San D ego Sights Whether it's adventures our in the open sea, the high-rolling excitement and action of a world-class casino, or the simple pleasures of blue skies and rolling hills in California's wine country, this city that boasts the only natural harbor on the Southern California coast has got it all -- and more. BARONA CASINO More than 1,000 video machines and huge jack- featured at Barona Casino. Buffet, food court in the premises; Barona indian Reservation, 1000 Wildcat Canyon Road, L~keside; (935) 443-2300. TEFIECULA The lush Temecula VaJley, less than an hour from San Diego, is home to 14 wlnerles that produce award-winning premium wines and offer daily tours, wine tastings and sumptuous food; Visitor Information, (909) 699-3626 and (800) 801 ~9463. SD 78 Wild Blue Yonder A great climate and magnificent coastline make San Diego a mecca for hot-air balloonists. The Skysurfer Balloon Co., Inc. (800- 660-6809) has flown skyward since 1979. Enioy a tranquil sunset hot-air balloon flight over the Del Mar coast. Relax high in the air for an unfor- gettable three- hour comes com- plete with chilled beverages. It's the only way to fly. In addition, you can travel above the lovely Temecula area in a hot-air balloon. Contact the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce at (909) 676-5090. Get your camera and strike out for the attractions of San Diego. There's more than enough fun for the entire family. Critters Are Us Spanning 100 acres in Balboa Park, the San Diego Zoo (619-234- 3153) is a lush botanical garden with an incredible array of wildlife. More than 4,000 animals from 900 species inhabit grounds planted with tall eucalyptus, graceful palms, ferns and vines of every description. Take the descending trail into a steamy tropical rain forest at Tiger River, featuring upwards of 100 animals in an exotic garden setting. At Gorilla Tropics, a troop of lowland gorillas tromps across a grassy slope to grab lunch from bamboo stalks· Computer-generated "thundershowers" help to replicate the animals' native surroundings. Catch Hippo Beach, and see four river hippos swimming around their replicated African river valley, complete with tropical vegetation and exotic birds. Experience underwater viewing of the Polar Bear Plunge, and watch magnificent "ice bears" and other Arctic animals dive, fish and swim in their 130,000-gallon chilled habitat·Giant Panda Hotline: (888) MY PANDA. SD 75 For Theme-sters The theme-park capital has got to be Orange County. Disneyland (1313 Harbor Blvd., Anaheim; 714-781- 4565) is full of exciting adventure with the Indiana Jones Adventure, the "Spirit of Pocahontas" stage show and "Mulan." New to the scene is "Light Magic," a parade of lights, fiber optics, special effects, music and more. Costumed characters mingle with visitors in the eight themed areas -- Adventureland, Fantasyland, Frontierland, The New Tomorrowland, Critter Country, New Orleans Square, Main Street U.S.A. and Mickey's Toontown. Knott's Berry Farm (Beach Boulevard and La Palma Avenue, Buena Park; 714-220-5200) features 165 rides, plus live shows and attractions designed to illuminate the Old West. There are six themed areas: Ghost Town, Camp Snoopy, Indian Trails, Fiesta Village, the Boardwalk and Wild Water Wilderness. Park open daily; call for hours. At Medieval Times Dinner & Tournament (7662 Beach Boulevard, Buena Park; 714-521-4740), knights on horseback stage an equestrian show and compete in real medieval tournament games. Performances nightly; call for reservations. Get a fascinating glimpse of the nation's early days at Wild Bill's Wild West Dinner Extravaganza (7600 Beach Boulevard, Buena Park; 714-522-6414). During a four- course dinner in a Western-themed dining hall, cowboys and Indians, singers and dancers entertain in a hearty 1800s-era spectacle. Call for reservations and show times. Wihe Country R.olling hills dotted with vineyards and.horse ranches lie lust 50 miles southeast of Orange County in.the peaceful Te'mecula Valley. This is the perfect spot-to relish p~cturesque surroundings while you enloy some memorable activiues. Th~ valley is home to Thoroughbred sta- bles and 14 award-winning wineries that offer tours and tastings. In and around Temecula, you'll find everything from antique stores in Old Town to championship golf courses and hot-air balloon rides, ag well as lively events .including the Temecula Rod Run Feb. 17-18, 2001) and the annual Balloon and Wine Festival /early May. 2001 . For more information, call the Temecula Ch~imber ot: CoMmerce at (9091 676-$090. 0C97 Courses of Action RANCH SAN JOAQUIN GOLF COURSE I Sandburg Way, Irvine/(949) 786-5S22 Size: 18 holes. Par: 72. Yardages: 6,229 (Men's), 5,794 (Ladies'}. Ratings: 68.9 {Men's}, 66.7 (Ladies'). Green fees: Inexpensive- Moderate. Three lakes and rolling terrain characterize this beautiful course. REAL DEL MAR GOLF RESORT-MEXICO KM 19.5, South of Tiiuana/ 011-526-613-3401 Size: 18 holes. Par: 72. Yardages: 6,403 (Champi- onship), 5,949 (Men's), 5,534 (Ladies'). Ratings: 70.5 (Championship}, 67.8 (Men's), 70.5 (Ladies'}. Green fees: Moderate. Most holes offer incredible views of the blue Pacific. REDHAWK GOLF CLUB 45100 P~edhawk Pkwy., Temecula/ (800) 45 I-HAWK Size: 18 holes. Par: 72. Yardages: 6,755 (Champi- onship), 6,310 (Men's}, 5,515 (Ladies'}. Ratings: 72.7 (Championship), 69.5 (Men's), 72 (Ladies'). Green fees: Moderate. Located in the heart of the wine coun- try, this championship course sits at the base of Palomar Mountain. It features 90 bunkers and five lakes, in ad- dition to winding creeks and multi-level greens. Many holes offer five teeing areas. Ask about twilight rates. RIDGELINE COUNTRY CLUB 10SI N. Meads Ave., Orange/(7i4) 538-5030 Size: 9 holes. Par: 31 (Men's), 32 (Ladies'). Yardages: 1,831 (Men's), 1,758 (Ladies'). Ratings: 57.2 (Men's)~ Green fees: In- expensive. This short execu- tive course has some dramatic elevated tees. Night lighted. RIVERVIEW GOLF COURSE 1800 V~ 22nd St., Santa Anal(714) 543-1115 Size: i8 holes. Par: 70. Yardages: 6,001 {Champi- onship}, 5,288 (Men's/, 4,979 (Ladies'). Ratings: 66.1 (Championship), 64.4 (Men's}. Green fees: Inexpen- sive. Past Riverview tourna- ment winners include Tiger Woods. Night lighted. Tree- lined fairways make this a pleasant round. RIVERWALK GOLF CLUB liS0 Fashion Valley Road, San Diego/(619) 296-4653 Size: 18 holes (all courses~. Par: 72. Yardages 6,550 (Mission-Presidio), 6,627 (Presidio-Friars), 6,383 (Fri- ars-Mission). Green fees: In- expensive-moderate. This Ted Robinson-designed re- sort course is just minutes from downtown San Diego. SHORECLIFFS GOLF COURSE 501 Avenida Vaquero, San Clernente/ (949) 492-1177 Size: 18 holes. Par: 72. Yardages: 6,228 (Champi- onship), 5,854 (Men's), 5,223 (Ladies'). Ratings: 71.3 (Championship), 69.3 (Men's}, 70.6 (Ladies'}. Green fees: inexpensive- moderate. President Nixon used to play this course when residing at San Clemente. Watch the creek that runs through the course -- it may wreak havoc with your score. STRAWBERRY FARMS GOLF CLUB I ~ Strawberry Farms Road, Irvine/(949) 551-18l I Size: 18 holes. Par: 71. Yardages: 6,700 (Men's). Green fees: Expensive. This course is beautifully set with- in canyons and wetlands. You'll love the picturesque vistas and waterfalls. This is a favorite course among those in the know. TEMECULA CREEK INN GOLF COURSE 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road, Temecula/(909) 676-2405 Size: 18 hopes. Par: 72. Yardages: 6,784 Creek-Oaks), 6,693 Oaks-Stonehouse), 6,605 Stonehouse-Creek). Rat- ings: 72.6 (Creek-Oaks), 72.6 (Oaks-Stonehouse), 71.8 (Stone- house-Creek). Green fees: Moderate. Each hole is sur- rounded by gently rolling hills, granite boulders and knotted oaks. TORREY PINES MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE 11480 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla/(619) 570-1234 Size: 18 holes. Yardages: 6,647 {North), 7,055 (South). Ratings: 72.1 (North), 74.6 (South). Green fees: Moderate. The South Course is one of the most challenge, and breathtaking, public courses in the state. The breaks are amazing. The North course features lots of ocean views. WILLOWICK GOLF COURSE 3017 West Sth St., Santa Aha/ (714) 554-0672 Size: 18 holes. Par: 71. Yardages: 6,063 {Men's), .5,742 (Ladies'). Ratings: 67.4 (Men's), 71.5 (Ladles'). Green fees: Inexpensive. WiI- lowick was built in the 1920s. Eucalyptus and pine trees along the fairway, offer challenges as well as a pic- turesque vista. Low handi- cappers will be challenged by difficult greens and sand- traps, and the beginner will love the short flat layout. calendar Temecula Times You might feel like you're miles from Southern California, but it's a glorious illu- sion. Just one hour north of San Diego via the I- I S, Temecula is a popu- lar community of wineries, shops and eaterie~ Ouring summer time, the living is easy down here. Enjoy the Harvest Festival and Hayride at Callaway Winery (Sept. 23; 800-472-2377, Ext. 206). At Thornton Winery, jazz lovers are treated to great music and cham. pagne, September 17 and 24, while the popular Concert on the Champagne Fountain Terrace fills the air with music on September 24 (909- 699-3021). And every Saturday in November, it's the Farmers Market at Sixth and Front Streets. Fall in San Diego means celebra- tions, exciting sporting events and much more. Be sure to call ahead to conj~rm dates, times and admis- Through September San Diego Padres. Baseball's National League Western Division is set aflame each season by the splendid play of these swingin' athletes. Catch a regular season game at Qualcomm Stadium. 9449 Fria*s Roa~, off l-8 and [-15, Migion Valley/(619) 881-6500. September 23-24 Ar~ Festival. The thriving arts and cultural com- muni~ of La Jolla is the perfect backdrop for some of the most innovative are in the area. There will also be food and entertainment, ptus bands-on art activities for the Idds. Call (888) ART-FES77 october~anuary September 30 Rosarito-Ensenada 50-Mile Fun Bicycle Ride. An estimated 8,000 intrepid cyclists head soutb along the two- lane free road from Rosarito Beach, Mexico, to the legendary Finish Line Fiesta in Ensenada. The race starts at 10 a.m., and riders begin to arrive at the finish line around 3 p.m. t:or fi~rther information, call (619) 583-3001. Through December San Diego Chargers, The Bolts take on all comers, and every game counts for the Chargers, who compete in the AFC Western Conference, one of the toughest in the NFL. Their home games are played at Qualcomm $¥adium. Call (619) 280-2121. October 04 Oktobeffest. A perennial fall tradition. Oktoberfest is celebrated with Bavarian bands, dancing, a beer gaMen, art~ and crafts and more, beginning Friday at 5 p.m.; all day SatuMay and Sunda}c La Mesa BlvrZ, betw~vz Acada and 4th Svs. La Mesa (east of San Diego, via Hwy 94)/(6! 9) 465-7700. September 23-Oc~ 22 $th Annual Fallbrook Sculpture Show. If you Io,~e sculpture as well as a good time, this is the event for you. Make your way out to the relaxing community of Fallbrook for a chance to get a glimpse of some fine work. The Art & Cultural Cent~ Fallbrook/(760) 728-1414. November 2 Dia de los Muerto~. The "Day oFrhe Dead bration, a traditional Hispanic folk holiday, tures elaborate dccora~ by luminarias and can~ Tours begin at dusk at. Campo 8anto Cemeter) (619) 49!-0! !0. November 23-26 San Diego Thanksgivin: Dixieland Jazz F~stival. Thanksgiving revelers c indulge in yet another ~ cious American creafio~ ms 32 bands perform or stages. Town &Count0 and Convention Cen~er. Circle, off [-8, San Dieg 297-527Z APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager DATE: October 24, 2000 SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Report for the Month of September 2000 Prepared By: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst CODE ENFORCEMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2000 TYPE OF COMPLIANT Housing/Apartment Zoning/Land Use Trash, Litter, Waste, Dumping Vehicles, Public Property Vehicles, Private Property Vehicles, Follow-up Vehicles Towed Mics. Investigations Notice of Violation Stop Work Orders Citatione Issued Business License Violations Notice/Order Posted Vendor/Solicitor Signs/Ballons Animals/Bees 100 101 102 103 103 110 114 111 113 115 112 105 116 102 107 117 51 14,: 12 4 TOTAL FIELD INSPECTIONS Signs Abated in ROW Active Cases Cases Closed TOTAL ACTIONS TAKEN IN SEPTEMBER 34~l 67 44 4( 4 0 APPROVAL ~,4,~ ,"~"~ CITY ATTO R N EY._,I(~/~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCEjr:~-~, CITY MANAGER /'"~.~ J ' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official October 24, 2000 Departmental Report September 2000 PREPARED BY:Carol Brockmeier, Administrative Secretary TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ................................................................... 229 NSFR .................................................................................................................. 74 NCOM ................................................................................................................... 3 TOTAL VALUATION ....................................................................................... $6,259,198 TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED ............................................... 4530 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FtNANCE~ CITY MANAGER City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 24, 2000 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of Septembert 2000. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report September / October 2000 Prepared By: Brian Guillot Reviewed By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: October 24, 2000 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection &First Street, Old Town Front Street, and Santiago Road will be signalized. The Contractor has completed the br/dge soffit (bottom) falsework with steel placement beginning the fourth week &October. The bridge soffit concrete pour is scheduled to occur in mid November. Construction of the EMWD lit~ station has begun with the first order of work being the excavation of the wet well. Storm drain work along Santiago Road is continuing with paving on the westside of Front and Pujol Streets scheduled for the end of this month. 2. Pala Road Bridge The new Pala Road Bridge is now open to through traffic. Punchlist, as-builts, and final survey, remain to be completed on this contract. The City is awarding contracts to complete the required environmental mitigation measures and landscape enhancements as well as the construction of additional sound walls along Pala Road. 3. Sports Park Tot Lot Equipment Replacement McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. was awarded the construction contract at the May 9, 2000, City Council Meeting. Construction began on September 13, 2000. The installation of the play equipment is completed. Rubber surfacing and landscaping installation started the week of October 16 and October 23, 2000. Construction will be completed in early November. 4. Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation The project is complete and the parking lot is now open to the public. Notice of completion is pending. 5. FY99-2000 Pavement Management System, Various Streets This is a new project to reconstruct roadway pavement on Ynez Road between Santiago Road and La Paz Street. The project is 70% complete. Additional funds approved by City Council on 9/12 will allow for an additional 1500 feet of pavement reconstruction on Ynez south of La Paz Street. The anticipated completion date is mid November. R:\MonthlyAc v tyReport\CIP\2000\Septembe, 6. Old Town Parking Lot Tm~een Landscape was awarded the construction contract at the August 8, City Council Meeting. The nonce to proceed was issued to the contractor on September 18, 2000. TruGreen began construction on the parking lot on October 2, 2000. The existing shade structure has been dismantled, and the removal of existing asphalt is nearly complete. Elecmcal and water conduit is scheduled to be placed the last week of October. 7. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two nexv second floor restrooms. Construction will also include a single story office space addition. All Bids were rejected at the 10/24/00 Council Meeting. The Project will be re-bid after plan modifications are complete. Anticipated time for re-advertisement is 12/00. 8. Pala Road Bridge Landscape This project will install landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restore the wetlands in the construction zone. It includes the installation of an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. Bids were opened on September 21, 2000, with the project being awarded to Diversified Landscape on October 10, 2000, City Council Meeting in the amount of $174,961. Construction should begin in mid November and be completed by February 2001. 9. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block Soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. Bids were opened on October 5, 2000. The Public Works Department is recommending award of this project to R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. for a base amount of $320,000 at the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2000. 10. Sports Park Pond Desiltation The project will include the removal of 15,000 cubic yards of silt from the existing pond located along Rancho Vista Road. Bids were opened on October I2, 2000. The Public Works Department is recommending award of this project to Clubb Grading in the amount of $104,690.76 at the October 24, 2000, City Council Meeting. The project should begin in mid November and be completed January 2001. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS None 2 R:\MonthlyActivity Repot t\CIP\2000\September PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road - Low-flow Crossing at Via Montezuma This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. Surveying of the project area is complete, and the in-house design is 95% complete. The completed improvement plans were submitted to Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFC) on August 11, 2000, for 1st plan review. The plans were also submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their review. Comments were received from RCFC and the plans were resubmitted. Tom Dodson & Associates, an environmental consultant, has begun the work necessary for the permitting process. Converse Consultants will be taking soil samples of the project ama by the week of October 23. RCFCD is developing a cooperative agreement with the City for the construction and maintenance of the Low-Flow, we expect the draft to be sent to the city the week of October 23. Project specifications are being prepared. Converse consultants will be taking soil samples the week of October 23, 2000. The project area clearing window is from September through March due to environmental constraints. 2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. Areas to be rehabilitated were identified, and plans and specifications are being reviewed and completed. This project should be advertised for bids by the end of October. 3. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. The designer is currently preparing the improvement plans for 90% submittal. The design is scheduled for completion by November 2000. 4. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Road. The City returned 90% plan check comments to the consultant for revision this month. Design plans will be completed during the month of October and the project should be advertised for bids in November. 5. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliar~ Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north 0fWinchester Road. The consultant returned the 2nd plan check to Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) and they have provided us with their comments. Consultant has submitted the 2nd plan check to Caltrans. 6. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at Wolff Valley. The plans and specifications are complete. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 3 R:\MonthlyActivilyRepor t\CIP\2000\S eptember 7. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Ci~ staffhas completed the review &the 70% improvement plans and specifications, and sent a plan check letter to DMJM, the consultant~ the week of September 18, 2000. DMJM is proceeding with the work, which includes geotechnical, utility research, environmental, and final design. The project is funded only/'or design at this time. . 8. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction ~fthe Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Peehanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the t~.mk sewer and the interim styeet improvements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. Murrieta Development Corporation will be constructing the new trunk sewer and pavement section from Clubhouse Drive to the main entrance of the Peehanga Casino. The tentative starting date for the sewer construction is October 23, 2000. The interim project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 9. Ranch° Calif°rnia R°ad Median Modifications at Town Center and Adding a Right Turn Lane on Westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez The project will include the closing o£the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front o£the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Coiinas. A new project to add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez is being combined with this project due to its close proximity and for efficiency. The project is currently in design. Right of way acquisition at the northeast comer o£Rancho California and Ynez will be required. 10. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The design process has begun and the work will be coordinated with the design o£the library project. The 30% improvement plan submittal should be delivered to the City in late October. ! 1. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be tbr recreational, office, and meeting purposes. The project is currently being plan checked by Building and Safety. 12. Temecula Library A Cull service iibra~y, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on ?cuba Road. just west of Fire Stat on #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. The design is progressing on schedule. The architect started on the final drawings after the committee completed its design and development meetings. Letters are being sent to all the utilities requesting service in£ormation. Utility services construction will be coordinated with ?auba Road, Phase II street improvement project. R:\MonthlyActivityReport\ClP\2000\Septem~r 13. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide additional traffic lanes. The consultant will do an alignment study to determine which side of the existing bridge should be widened. A kickoff meeting to begin design was held with TY Lin McDaniel on September 12, 2000. The design is progressing and should take approximately six months. 14. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool The design committee decided upon the layout of the 25-yard x 25-meter pool at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included in the construction bid. The design concept is now complete and the consultant is released to prepare final construction plans and specifications, which shall be submitted for staff review in November 2000. 15. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install a sidewalk on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Staff is gathering the data, reviewing concepts, and establishing a layout. 16. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Redesign In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem. Preliminary plans, specifications and cost estimate are complete. TCSD review is pending. This project will be advertised for construction bids in November 17. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita In this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Margarita Road at Stonewood Drive. Design is underway. First submittal is expected by the end of October. 18. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Information is being gathered. The preparation of Plans and Specifications will start shortly. 19. Pavement Management System - City,vide This project will involve rehabilitating various streets in the City. In addition, the Pavement management System Program (PMS) for the City will be updated. Work on updating the PMS program has started. 20. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added to accommodate increasing traffic. Staffis reviewing this project to determine requirements. Coordination with Caltrans will be required since Winchester is a State route at this location. 5 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2000\Septem bet 21. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road This project will re-stripe the northbound on-ramp from westbound Winchester to I- 15 to allow for a better flow of traffic. A striping plan is in the process of being prepared. The City xvill be applying for an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans. 22. Overland Drive Extension/Murrieta Creek Bridge This project will entail alignment studies and design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. Staff went through the RFP process to select a design consultant. Contract negotiations are under way with the most qualified consultant. 23. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will add a right turn lane from eastbound Winchester to southbound Jefferson starting at Enterprise Circle. Preliminary utility research and data gathering is underway. Design survey RFp is scheduled to be completed by the end of the month. 6 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\ClP\2000XSeptember > 0 n i n 0 o > 0 o 0 n~ D. (D 0 0 0 0 LLI Z ill ill CD .-I o TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~.~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent October 3, 2000 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - September, 2000 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of September, 2000: I. SIGNS A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired 9O 20 18 10 2~930 60 14 200 2~137 48 II. TREES A. Total trees tdmmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns Ill. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 448 New and repainted legends B. 100 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 43 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 46 service order requests for the month of Au~lust~ 2000. The Maintenance Crew has also put in '190 events and response to street emergencies. hours of overtime which includes standby time, special The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of September~ 2000 was $ 15~,~85.00 compared to $ 7~165.00 for the month of Au~lust~ 2000. Account No. 5402 $ 11,535.00 Account No. 5401 $ 3,000.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ 1,050.00 CC: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (ClP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegda, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) F~ STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of September, 2000 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 09/22/00 VARIOUS CITY CHANNELS · REMOVE DEBRIS AND POST EMERGENT SPRAYING #5401 TOTAL COST $3,000.00 Date: 09/25/00 OLD TOWN, DIAZ ROAD, PAUBA ABATE WEEDS, PICK-UP LITTER AND ROAD AND ROUTE FOR "RACE FOR MINOR WEED SPRAYING # 5402 THE CURE" TOTAL COST $5,000.00 CONTRACTOR: TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION Date: 09/26/00 OLD TOWN STEAM CLEAN SIDEWALKS AND APPLY P.C.C. SEALANT # 5402 TOTAL COST $5,000.00 CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING Date: 09/20/00 42288 AGENA AVENUE REMOVE 20' LINEAR OF SIDEWALK AND REPAIR MAIN LINE # 5402 TOTAL COST $1,535.00 CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE CONTRACTORS Date: 09/29/00 SERVICE LEVEL "R" BLADE ROADS DUE TO MODERATE DIRT ROADS RAIN FALL # 99-5402 TOTAL COST $1,050.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $ 3,000.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $11,535.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 1,050.00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 09/01/00 30845 AVENIDA DE L REPOSO CULVERT CLEANING 09/01/00 09/01/00 41237 COG HILL DRIVE DEAD TREE 09/01/00 09/0100 40250 BENDWOOD COURT TREE TRIMMING 09/01/00 09/01/00 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY POTHOLES 09/01/00 09/05/00 WINCHESTER AT ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH VALVE CAN SINKING 09/05/00 09/06/00 31550 PASEO GOLETA TREE TRIMMING 09/06/00 09/06/00 32290 CORTE SAN VICENTE WATER LEAK 09/06/00 09/07/00 39300 OAK CLIFF STORM DRAIN CLEANING 09/07/00 09/07/00 27850 SYCAMORE MESA ROAD LITTER REMOVAL 97/07/00 09/08/00 HEITZ LANE POTHOLE 09/08/00 09/08/00 31420 CORTE MADERA STORM DRAIN CLEANING 09/08/00 09/I 1/00 31321 HURON STREET LITTER REMOVAL 09/11/00 09/12/00 45711 KIMO STREET RAISED SIDEWALK 09/12/00 09/13/00 30745 MIRA LOMA DRIVE GRAFFITI 09/13/00 09/13/00 CALLE LONDE AT CALLE GERONA LITTER REMOVAL 09/13/00 09/14/00 VIA TELESIO STREET PAVING 09/14/00 09/14/00 31090 NASSAU COURT SIDEWALK REPAIR 09/14/00 09/14/00 42005 KAFF1RBOOM TREE REMOVAL 09/14/00 09/14/00 30305 DEL REY DEBRIS REMOVAL 09/14/00 09/14/00 41531 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CATCH BASIN CLEANING 09/14/00 09/I 5,'00 27469 JON CHRISTIAN SIN KHOLE 09/15/00 09/15~00 41848 ASTEROID LITTER REMOVAL 09/15/00 09/1700 41526 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CATCH BASIN CLEANING 09/15/00 09/18:00 29753 CALLE PALMAS DEBRIS PICK-UP 09/18/00 09/18/00 30260 SANT1AGO ROAD WANTS GRINDINGS 09/18/00 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 09/18/00 42040 KAFFIRBOOM TREE REMOVAL 09/18/00 09/18/00 41790 WINCHESTER ROAD POTHOLES 09/18/00 09/18/00 30537 MILKY WAY TP~EE TRIMMING 09/18/00 09/19/00 41844 4TM STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL 09/19/00 09/19/00 41531 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CATCH BASIN CLEANING 09/19/00 09/19/00 30516 WA1LEA COURT DEBRIS PICK-UP 09/19/00 09/19/00 45367 ESCALANTE COURT TREE REMOVAL 09/19/00 09/20/00 3 I$19 PASEO DE LAS OLAS RAISED SIDEWALK 09/20/00 09/20/00 31411 DE PORTOLA ROAD CHANNEL CLEANING 09/20/00 09/20/00 29887 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL STREET FAILURE 09/20/00 09/20/00 42050 KAFFIRBOOM COURT DEAD TREE 09/20/00 09/22/00 28465 CHAPPARRAL MALL DEBRIS ON SIDEWALK 09/22/00 09/25/00 41531 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CATCH BASIN CLEANING 09/25/00 09/25/00 41844 4TM STREET DEBRIS PICK-UP 09/25/00 09/25/00 JEFFERSON AT DEL RIO BROKEN GLASS PICK-UP 09/25/00 09/26/00 30780 LOMALINDA CAR IN CATCH BASIN 09/26/00 09/27/00 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD SOUTH OF JEREZ GRAFFITI 09/27/00 09/29/00 OVERLAND BRIDGE GRAFFITI 09/29/00 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 4~3 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/01/00 HEITZ AT BRITTON REPLACE R-1 09/01/00 MARGARITA PARK INSTALLED W-17 09/05/00 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD REPLACED R2, - 40 09/05/00 VIA GILBERTO INSTALLED 2 TYPE "N" W-31 09/05/00 31536 CALA CARRASCO REPLACED W53 09/05/00 CALA ROSSO AT CALA CARRASCO REPLACED R-I 09/05/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT FRONT STREET INSTALLED 3 TYPE "K" 09/06/00 VIA NORTE AT CALLE PII~A COLADA REPLACED W-17 09/06/00 DEL REY AT AVENIDA DEL REPOSSO REPLACED R-I 09/06/00 MAIN STREET AT MERCEDES INSTALLED 3 "NO DUMPING" 09/06/00 MARGARITA AT LA SERENA REPLACED 10 R26 / R81 W-41 09/06/00 SOLANA AT NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY REPLACED 3 R26 / RS1 09/07/00 MARGARITA SOUTH OF WINCHESTER REPLACED 9 R26 / R81 09/07/00 ANDREWS WAY AT SERAPHINA REPLACED R-1 09/07/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. EAST OF CITY LIMITS REPLACED Wl4 09/I 1/00 RANCHO CAL1F. RD. W/O BUSINESS PARK DRIVE REPLACED CARSONITE 09/12/00 RANCHO VISTA AT AVENIDA DE LA RE1NA REPLACED R-1 "T.C." 09/15/00 SOLANA WAY AT YNEZ REPLACED R2 45 "T.C." 09/15/00 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY WEST OF MARGARITA REPLACED R-81 "T..C." 09/15/00 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY AT LA COLINA INSTALLED W-80 09/19/00 DIAZ AT RIO NEDO REPLACED DELINEATOR 09/19/00 CALLE GIRASOL REPLACED 3 W81 09/20/00 NO. GENERAL EARNEY AT LA COLMA INSTALLED R-2 45 09/20/00 DEL REY AT LOS NOGALES REPLACED W-7 09/20/00 CALLE PI~A COLADA AT VIA NORTE REPLACED W-45 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/21/00 FRONT STREET AT HWY 79 SO. REPLACED DELINEATOR 09/21/00 PALA ROAD NORTH OF LOMALINDA REPLACED R2 "50" 09/21/00 SOLANA WAY AT MOTOR CAR PARKWAY INSTALLED 4 TYPE "K" 09/21/00 YNEZ ROAD SOUTH OF OVERLAND REPLACED 13 R26 / 81 09/21/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER REPLACED 3 TYPE "K" 09/25/00 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA REPLACED W-41 09/25/00 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA INSTALLED 3 W-32 09/25/00 WALCOTT LANE SOUTH OF KLARER LANE INSTALLED W-2 09/26/00 LA SERENA AT MEADOWS DRIVE REPLACED 3 DELINEATORS 09/26/00 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT LOWER HWY 79 REPLACED R-1 & S.N.S. 09/27/00 FRONT STREET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA REPLACED 15 DELINEATORS 09/27/00 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY EAST OF MARGARITA REPLACED 11 R26 / 81 COMBOS TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 90 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 20 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 18 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 09/05/00 28890 FRONT STREET REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. ! 28 6.5 09/06/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT FRONT STREET REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 240 6.5 09/07/00 29440 VIA NORTE REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 195 6.0 09/11/00 29440 VIA NORTE REMOVE & REPLACE A..C. 180 5.5 09/12/00 29440 VIA NORTE REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 161 5.0 09/13/00 WINCHESTER AT ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH A.C. OVERLAY 390 3.0 09/18/00 STONEWOOD COURT REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 156 3.0 09/19/00 MARGARITA AT LA SERENA A.C. OVERLAY 102 2.0 09/20/00 MARGARITA NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 210 7.0 09/21/00 6TM STREET AT PUJOL A.C. OVERLAY 285 3.0 09/25/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF JEFFERSON A.C. OVERLAY 509 5.0 09/26/00 MARGARITA NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 32 2.0 09/27/00 HEITZ LANE AT PROMONADE CHARDONNAY HILLS REMOVE & REPLACE A.C. 96 2.5 09/28/00 FELIX VALDEZ AT RADIUS A.C. OVERLAY 246 3.0 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2,930 TOTAL TONS 60 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/01/00 AP. EA #4 REPAINTED 28 LEGENDS 09/05/00 AREA g4 REPAINTED 114 LEGENDS 09/07/00 AREA ~4 REPAINTED 61 LEGENDS 09/13/00 APdA #4 REPAINTED 45 LEGENDS 09/14/00 AREA #4 REPAINTED 53 LEGENDS 09/25/00 OLD TOWN REPAINTED 74 LEGENDS 09/27/00 AREA #4 REPAINTED 42 LEGENDS 09/27/00 FRONT STREET SOUTH OF SANTIAGO EAST SIDE REPAINTED 100' RED CURB 09/28/00 MEADOWVIEW AREA REPAINTED 31 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 448 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 100 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/05/00 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD TRIMlVlED 2 R.O.W. TREES 09/07/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WEST OF DIAZ TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 09/08/00 PAUBA AT YNEZ TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 09/18/00 AGENA AT ALPHA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 09/21/00 2sD STREET AT FRONT STREET TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 10 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/07/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. E/O CITY LIMITS CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 09/12/00 RAINBOW CREEK AT OAK CLIFF CLEANED & CHECKED 4 CATCH BAS[NS 09/14/00 33304 VIA CHAPPARO CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BAS[NS 09/15/00 41531 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BAS[NS 09/19/00 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT CALLE BAHIA VISTA CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BAS[NS 09/19/00 JEFFERSON AT OVERLAND CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BAS[NS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 14 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ' RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/11/00 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON ABATED 200 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 200 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/05/00 MASTERS AT CLUBHOUSE REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/05/00 PUJOL AT 6TM STREET REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/06/00 CALLE ARANDA AT SOLANA REMOVED 200 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/07/00 WARBLER AT NICHOLAS REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/11/00 WINCHESTER AT 1-15 REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/11/00 WINCHESTER AT YNEZ REMOVED 4 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 09/11/00 PALA ROAD BRIDGE REMOVED 212 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/11/00 30417 CUPE~O REMOVED 72 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/I 1/00 HWY 79 SO. AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REMOVED 500 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/12/00 OVERLAND AT JEFFERSON REMOVED 16 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 09/12/00 PALM PLAZA AT YNEZ REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/12/00 JEFFERSON AT ADOBE PLAZA REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/13/00 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY AT SIERRA MADRE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/15/00 WINCHESTER AT RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 104 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 09/15/00 WINCHESTER AT NICHOLAS REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 26201 YNEZ REMOVED 72 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 NICHOLAS AT NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY REMOVED 115 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 29210 STONEWOOD REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MORAGA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 MORAGA AT MARGARITA (17 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 74 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 EL GRECO AT RANCHO V1STA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/18/00 SOUTHERN CROSS AT MARGARITA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/19/00 OVERLAND AT JEFFERSON REMOVED 2 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 09/19/00 CALLE GIRISOL REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/27/00 ROCK BLUFF AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 09/27/00 RAINBOW CREEK AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/27/00 29740 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/27/00 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD SOUTH OF JEREZ REMOVED 184 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/28/00 YUKON AT MARGARITA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/28/00 OVERLAND AT MARGARITA REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/28/00 YNEZ AT COMMERCE REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 09/29/00 OVERLAND BRIDGE AT HWY 15 REMOVED 362 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 2,137 TOTAL LOCATIONS 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 ,~' ~ o 0 0 0 0 APPROVAL ClTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~i~/__/~.._ CITY MANAGER~:::~/ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~ October 24, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during September of 2000. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to thirty-four "priority one" calls for service during the month of August, with an average response time of approximately 6.7 minutes. A total of 1,324 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of August, the Temecula Police Depadment's storefront served a total of 314 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed ninety-two prints taken, twenty people filed police reports, thirty people had citations signed off, eight oversized vehicle permits and six solicitor's permit were issued. Cdme Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs dudng the month. Officer Fanene conducted twenty-one residential secudty visits and twenty-seven business secudty visits dudng the month. He conducted thirty-one visits to businesses for crime follow up information. Officer Fanene also conducted four "stranger danger" and community safety presentations. Officer Fanene was recognized at the California Cdme Prevention Officers Association Conference and was one of the recipients for the regional Crime prevention Officer of the Year. The POP Team of Officers Jori Anderson and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. The officers are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify three complexes who are continuing with the program. Programs conducted this month included Old Town patrols. No significant activity was reported. The team conducted a warrant program, which resulted in twelve suspects being arrested for outstanding warrants (one for a million-dollar warrant). The team also worked enforcement in the parks dudng this month where a decrease in vandalism was noted. The continuing homeless program resulted in the arrest of one homeless male during the month as a result of cdminal activity in an apartment complex. A juvenile alcohol decoy program was conducted Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 on September 15, no businesses out of the twenty-three contacted were observed to sell alcohol to a minor. This was the fifth month that the Old Town Storefront was operational. This storefront has served as an office for the POP team and has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served fifty-five customers, fourteen fingerprints were taken and six reports were written. The traffic team reported that dudng the month of August there were 529 citations issued (over a 100% increase from last month)for hazardous violations, eighty-seven citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 126 parking citations were issued. There were nine injury collisions, forty-seven non-injury collisions and twenty-three drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program resulted in the arrest of one person for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 126 citations being issued (up from thirty-four citations dudng last months partial program). This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The traffic team also spearheaded the Temecula Revisited Rod Run car show. This event required the use of the Posse and reserves to assist with staffing. The event was a huge success with only two arrests reported. Crowds over the three-day event were estimated at 30,000. During the month of August, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 101 calls for service. The predominant numbers of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on four misdemeanors and twelve felony cases for vadous offenses. Eight citations were also issued. Dudng the month the officers worked several undercover details to target thieves. This will continue through the holiday season to deter theft of merchandise. The officers have also been conducting training in loss prevention to mall personnel. The Temecula Against Graffiti program (TAG), under the direction of POP Team Officer Jon Anderson, will be conducting a program during October (September program cancelled due to the Temecula Revisited Rod Run). The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the officers assisted with back to school and they began presentation sessions and counseling sessions with students. Five arrests were made at Chaparral High School, and two arrests were made at Temecula Valley High School. Activity at the elementary schools resulted in four arrests. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. During this month the fiftieth youth court sessions was held with nine cases being heard. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. During the month of September, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and Mark Kdkava handled a total of fifteen cases. These cases resulted in eighteen misdemeanor and thirteen felony arrests, pdmadly for narcotics violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. Dudng this month the team arrested seven suspects for transporting methamphetamine, one of these cases resulted in a controlled delivery of methamphetamine to the team before the suspects were arrested. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 583 hours of service in August. Volunteer assignments include computer data Monthly Depar[mental Report Page 3 input, logistics support, crime observation (TAG program surveillance), special event assistance and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, cdme prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 247 hours dudng the month. The posse contributed 309 hours dudng the month. APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mike Brown, City Fire Chief October 24, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of September, 2000. Temecula Fire Services Monthly Activity Statistics Month SEPTEMBER Year 2000 Emer~]ency Activity Sta. 12 Sta. 73 Sta. 83 Sta. 84 Totals Structure Fires 6 8 3 1 18 Vehicle Fires 4 2 2 2 10 Vegetation Fires 10 7 5 5 27 Other Fires 18 9 2 3 32 Medical Aids 75 49 52 74 250 Traffic Collisions 15 24 8 13 60 False Alarms 28 31 9 6 74 Fire Menace Standbys 2 2 1 6 11 Public Service Assists 2 10 2 8 22 Assists and Covers 13 13 2 ~9 47 Totals: 173 ~55 86 137 551 Fire Prevention Sta. 12 Sta.73 Sta. 83 Sta. 84 Totals Community Activities 0 0 ~ 0 1 School Programs 0 0 0 8 8 Fairs and Displays 3 1 0 1 5 !Company Inspections 0 45 0 0 45 LE-38 Dooryard Inspectio 31 0 0 0 31 Fire Investigations 0 0 0 0 0 Burning Permits Issued 2 0 0 2 4 Preplans I 0 I I 3 I Totals: 37 46 2 12 97 Form B15-1 (4/99) By: Carl Calderon Date: 10/6/00 MEDIC SQUAD 84 MONTHI,y RESPONSE SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 2000 Total Runs for the Month: 235 Medical Aids: 148 Traffic Collisions: 36 Public Service Assists: t2 Fire Menace Standby's: 3 Structure Fires: 11 Ringing Alarms: 21 Vehicle Fires: 2 Vegetation Fires: 0 Refuse Fires: 2 Hazardous Materials: 0 Average Response Time: 4.94 Minutes Longest Response Time: 11 Minutes Medic Squad was Canceled Prior to Patient Contact: 74 Times Medical Aid Responses with Medic Squad on Scene Prior to AMR: Performed Advanced Life Support: 39 Times 76 Times Medic Squad 84 responded to a total of 235 calls during the month. 184 of those calls were Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions, the squad was canceled 74 times or on 40% of those calls. The Medic Squad arrived on scene prior to AMR 76 times or 41% of the time and initiated Advanced life Support Care on 39 of those calls. AMRs average response time to those calls is 4.53 Minutes after the Medic Squad. On 8 occasions, the Medic Squad had to wait greater than 10 Minutes on scene for AMRto arrive. The longest wait time for AMR was 30 Minutes, the Medic Squad had 4 responses over 10 Minutes.