HomeMy WebLinkAbout072799 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
July 27, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
5:30 P;M. - Closed· Session of the City Council, in the, Main Conference Room,
pursuant to Government Code Section·s:
1. Conference with real property' negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54.956.8 conerning the acquisition of real property at 2849,6 Pujol Street (APN 922-
053-005). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecu'=!aiRedevelopment Agency
of the City of Temecula and Viefli=aus and Barker; Under negotiation are the price
and terms of payment of the real· .property interests proposed to be acquired. The
City/Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson, Jim O'Grady, and John Meyer.
2. 'ConferenceWith City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Cod3
· 54956.9(a) with respect·to one matter of existing litigation involving the City and/or
the Agency. The following case/claim will be discussed: (a) Blind Pig Brewery.
Conference with real· property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 28410 Front Street
(APN 922-023-019 and APN 921-070-006). The negotiating parties are the City of
TemeculalRedevelopmentAgency of the City of Temecula and: Richard G. Gabriel
and Marilyn F. Gabriel; Trustees·of the Gabriel Family Trust; James N. Senechal;
Trustee of the James N. Senechal Declaration of Trust; David L. Phares and Susie
G..Phares; Thomas H. Maxwell and Janice M. Maxwelj; and Wayne F. Whitehurst.
4. Discussion of candidates for position of City Manager to Government Code
Section 54957.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 99-20
Resolution: No. 99-73
R:~Agenda\072799
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Katie Welsh
Invocation:
Pastor John Chambers of Grace Presbyterian
Flag Salute:
Councilman Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
International Year of Older Persons in Temecula Proclamation
Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Team ('JOLT) Presentation
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
R:~genda\072799
2
3
4
5
Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT
Amendment No. 4 to Police Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Authorize modification to the City's current law enforcement contract with Riverside
County to add one traffic officer and one special team officer to increase patrol
hours by the equivalent of two full-time patrol officers and to authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract in substantially the form attached.
Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 88-12 ('Ynez
Corridor)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ
CORRIDOR)
Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations
RECOM M E N DATI ON:
5.1 Award a contract for Pentium based computer workstations to Tech 101-Arcus, Inc.,
16812 Millikan Avenue, Irvine, California, in the amount of $2,365.11 per unit, for a
total purchase amount of $243,606.59.
A.greement between City of Temecula and BidAmerica
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve an Agreement for the scanning of building permits for the Building and
Safety Department in its proposal for an amount not to exceed $37,760.45.
R:~,genda\072799
6 Agreement between City of Temecula and BidAmerica - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) KL/JC
7
8
9
10
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve an Agreement for the scanning of building permits for the Building and
Safety Department in its proposed for an amount not to exceed $37,760.45.
Contract Plan Checking Services - JAS Pacific. Inc, - Approved Staff Recommendation
(5-0-0) KL/JC
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve an Agreement for plan check services with JAS Pacific, Inc. and the
Building and Safety Department in the amount of $25,000;
7.2 Approve a 10% or $2,500 contingency for plan check services.
Contract Inspection Services Agreement for JAS Pacific. Inc, - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) KL/JC
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services for JAS Pacific, Inc., in the amount
of $60,320 to continue providing building inspection services to the Building and
Safety Department.
Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) KUJC
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with P & D Consultants in an
amount not to exceed $60,000 to provide supplemental building inspection services
to the Building and Safety Department.
Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0)
KL/JC
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for Plan Check
Services with Esgil Corporation;
10.2 Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for Plan Check
Services with VanDorpe Chou and Associates.
R:~Agenda\072799
4
12
Memorandum of Understandin.q for Emer.qencv Ambulance Services
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Temecula
and the County of Riverside, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency, for joint
monitoring of Ambulance Services.
13 Riverside County Library Contract Amendment
14
15
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to Agreement to
provide Library Services (additional staff);
13.2
Authorize the expenditure of an amount to exceed $150,000 to fund the Temecula
Library Volunteer Coordinator half-time position and to subsidize funding to maintain
the Senior Reference Librarian and Reference Librarian positions at the fiscal year
1998-99 level for fiscal year 1999-00.
Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Service
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Award the Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services contract to West Coast
Arborists, Inc., for $150,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
14.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $15,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Authorize Chan.qe to Temporary Partial Street Closures for Bike Races from July 31, 1999
to September 25, 1999 ('Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-
67 WHICH AUTHORIZED PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF
BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE
TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25,
1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY
31, 1999, TO CHANGE THE LATTER DATE TO SEPTEMBER
25, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE
PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS
R:~Agenda\072799
16
17
18
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21821 (located northwesterly of Via Norte at
Kahwea Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Accept the public street and water improvements in Tract No. 21821;
16.2
Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance security to the warranty level, initiation
of the one-year warranty period and release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation
security;
16.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract No. 21821
(located northwesterly of Via Norte at Kahwea Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO
THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT
NO. 2'182'1 )
Substitute A.qreements and Securities in Tract No. 24188-1 ('(located northwesterly of
intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement and Subdivision Monument
Agreements and Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation Securities in Tract No. 24188-1;
18.2 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation Securities on file;
18.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and sureties.
19 First Street Brid.qe Project - Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Approve agreement in the amount of $80,540 with Tom Dodson & Associates to
monitor the environmental impacts associated with the construction of the First
Street Bridge - Project No. PW95-08 - and authorize the Mayor to execute this
agreement.
R:~Agenda\072799
6
20
Renewal of Annual Street Striping Contract for FY99-00 - Proiect No. PW97-28
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Approve the extension of the Street Striping Contract with Pacific Striping, Inc. of
Whittier for Fiscal Year 1999-00 for a period one (1) year beginning July 1, 1999, in
an amount of $150,000.00;
20.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $15,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
21
Tract Map No. 23100-7 (located south of La Serena Way, east of Meadows Parkway,
west of Butterfield Stafie Road, and north of Rancho California Road in the Mar.qarita
Villafie Specific Plan No. 199
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23100-7 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
21.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
21.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
22
Agreement for Professional Service with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates for I-
15/SR-79 South Interchanfie Project Study Report (PSR) PW96-05 and I-15/Santia.qo
Road New Connection Concept Analysis - Project No. PW99-03
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Approve an agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates to provide
professional engineering services for the preparation of the I-15/SR-79 South
Interchange Project Study Report (PSR) and I-15/Santiago Road New Connection
Concept Analysis for an amount not to exceed $86,776.00 and authorize the Mayor
to execute the agreement;
22.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $8,677.60.
23
Acceptance of Grant of Easement of Storm Drain Improvements for the First Street Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST
STREET BRIDGE
R:%Agenda\072799
24 Second Readin.cl of Ordinance No. 99-18
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP
CHANGE) AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING
THE ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL L1 (1 ACRE TO 2.5 ACRE NET LOT SIZE) TO
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 (1/2 ACRE TO 1 ACRE NET
LOT SIZE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ESTERO STREET AND ORMSBY ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011
25 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-19
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (THE TEMECULA REGIONAL
CENTER), AMENDING SECTION IV.E.4., TO ALLOW A 21-
FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT MARQUEE ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 910-130-052,-053, AND -054
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND
THE WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCE AUTHORITY
R:~Agenda\072799
8
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01
Resolution: No. CSD 99-14
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Completion and Acceptance of the Community Recreation Center Gym Coolin.q System -
Proiect No. PW97-22CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one-year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
1.2
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of
the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
2 Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-00
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Award a twenty-three (23) month contract to Self's Janitorial Service to
provide park and facility restroom maintenance services in the amount not
to exceed $38,880 for Fiscal Year 1999-00.
R:~genda\072799
9
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Sports Complex Request for Qualifications and Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to qualified firms
for a feasibility study for the development of a sports complex;
3.2 Appoint two (2) members of the Board of Directors to serve on a sports
Complex subcommittee.
4 Children's Museum Request for Qualifications and Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to qualified firm
for a feasibility study regarding the development of a local children's museum;
4.2 Appoint two (2) members of the Board of Directors to serve on a children's
Museum subcommittee,
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, August 10, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow the City Council
Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~,genda~72799
10
~ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01
Resolution: No. RDA 99-11
Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Granting of an Easement for Storm Drain Improvements for the First Street Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST STREET
BRIDGE
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
R:~Agenda\072799
11
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, August 10, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow City Council Consent
Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~genda\072799
12
WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCE AUTHORITY .
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. WHFA 99-01
Resolution: No. WHFA 99-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Jeff Comerchero presiding
ROLL CALL
AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, and
Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 25, 1998.
2 Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Winchester
Hills)
RECOM MEN DATI ON:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\072799
13
RESOLUTION NO. WHFA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING
THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (WINCHESTER HILLS)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
R:~Agenda\072799
14
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval
of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing.
26
An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Recommend Approval to the City
Council for PA98-0511, a Zoning Amendment to create a Planned Development Overlay,
and the Planning Commission's approval of PA98-0512, a proposal to develop a 244-unit
senior apartment complex with two- and three-story buildin.qs on an 8.13 acre lot
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application NO. PA98-12;
26.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING AMENDMENT-
APPEAL) AND PA 98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN-APPEAL)
UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO
RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING
AMENDMENT) TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY AND TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO
PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A 244-UNIT SENIOR HOUSING COMPLEX ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085
26.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY
FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND 181 OF THE
TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY ALSO KNOWN AS
PARCEL A OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA 98-0477,
PREVIOUSLY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND
911-170-085 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 )
R:~Agenda~72799
15
27
Ordinance Re.qulatin.q Massaqe Establishments and Massage Practitioners (Planning
Application PA97-0201 ~
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
TEMECULA
REGULATIONS
THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
REGULATIONS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5.22 TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN
TEMECULA AND CHAPTER 5.23 TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
FOR MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS WITHIN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 596 AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY AND
AMENDING SECTION 1.08.010 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ADOPTION BY REFERENCE
OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCES
28
Adoption of an Ur.qencV Ordinance Prohibiting the Permittin.q, Approval, Development,
and Placement of Additional Wireless Communications Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Adopt an Urgency Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING AN EXTENSION OF ORDINANCE NO. 99-'17
WHICH ESTABLISHED A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING,
APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT, AND PLACEMENT OF ALL
FORMS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
COUNCIL BUSINESS
29
Infestation of the insect - Glassv-win.qed Sharpshooter
(at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Stone)
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1
Consider funding in an amount not to exceed $25,000 to the University of California
Riverside (UCR) for immediate research toward the recent infestation of this insect
in our local wineries.
R:~Agenda\072799
16
30 Award of Construction Contract for Rancho California Road at 1-15 Ramp Improvements -
Project No. PW95-12 (PW98-08)
RECOMMENDATION:
30.1 Receive an oral report on the bids received July 27, 1999;
30.2
Award a construction contract for the Rancho California Road At I-15 Ramp
Improvements- Project No. PW95-12 (PW98-08) and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract;
30.3 Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract amount.
31 Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project
RECOMMENDATION:
31.1 Receive and file a status report regarding the Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, August 10, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\072799
17
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM
1
ITEM
2
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office
of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the
amount of $2,211,317.25.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 27t" day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SE q
Res~ ~-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula
on the 27b day of July, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
07~08/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/15/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/27/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/08/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 07~27~99 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
$ 931,241.49
7,871.84
125,805.55
13,275.37
25,926.05
29,486.09
824.23
779,531.12
26,439.74
25,547.41
27,306.28
10,219.35
8,029.13
251.960.28
254,753.98
1,504,789.39
199,813.60
2,211,317.25
2,011,503.65
100 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
19,". TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
2, ,') REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED JADA Y.~ON~~irSPECIALIST
GE~~TOR OF FINANCE
138,517.62
3,932.77
40,560.61
64.86
165.21
2,214.04
953.48
~,162.66
703 11
5,144.58
1,263.81
4,130.85
199,813.60
2,211,317.25
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 13
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
147,457.49
4,724.50
26,482.89
187.68
67.07
1,380.58
451.62
10,313.04
17,106.39
24,751.37
8,747.56
5,634.89
4,655.20
TOTAL 251,960.28
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56593
56594
56595
56598
56598
56598
56598
56598
56598
56598
56598
56599
56599
56599
56599
56600
56601
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
56602
CHECK
DATE
07/01/99
07/01/99
07/07/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003710
003587
003751
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
000116
000116
000116
000116
003639
003679
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERA, FRED
RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC
RIVERSIDE CO EDUCATION
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
ADVANCE COPY SERVICES
AEI CASC ENGINEERING
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SUMMER CONCERT SERIES
PROF.SERVICES:O.T. STREETSCAPE
COMM.ACTION WKSHP:7/25-27/99
003552 CANCER
003552 EXP PROT
003552 EXP PROT
003552 EXP PROT
003552 HOSP IC
003552 STD
003552 STD
003552 STD
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
COBRA/JULY/VISION/GREEK
FAX MACHINE REPAIRS:STOREFRONT
EVALUATION:WIRELESS CONMUNICAT
JUN RENTAL MATS/TOWELS: CRC
JUN UNIFORMS RENTAL: PW MAINT
JUN UNIFORMS RENTAL: PW MAINT
JUN RENTAL MATS/TOWELS:SR CTR
JUN RENTAL MATS/TOWELS:TCC
JUN RENTAL MATS/TOWELS:C.HALL
JUN RENTAL MATS/TOWELS:MNTC FA
JUN UNIFORMS RENTAL:TCSD
JUN UNIFORMS RENTAL: TCSD
OVRCHRGED:PER CONTRACT NO PREP
OVRCHRGED:PER CONTRACT NO PREP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5370
280-199-824-5804
001-100-999-5258
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
300-2330
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
300-2330
001-2310
190-2310
340-2310
001-1180
001-170-999-5215
001-161-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
001-164-601-5243
001-164-601-5243
190-181-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
001-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
ITEM
AMOUNT
600.00
16,115.00
690.00
234.50
189.23
55.80
5.47
17.50
638.40
112.00
8.00
605.95
29.75
18.58
18.58
85.00
2,800.00
76.16
55.61
20.00
36.96
51.36
83.40
34.20
29.45
20.00
13.75-
13.75-
CHECK
AMOUNT
600.00
16,115.00
690.00
1,260.90
672.86
85.00
2,800.00
379.64
56603
56603
56603
56604
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
001323
001323
001323
000427
ARROWHEAD WATER INC
ARROWHEAD WATER INC
ARROWHEAD WATER INC
ARTESIA IMPLEMENT INC
DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL
DRINKING WATER FOR CRC
DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL
TCSD TRACTOR REPAIRS & SERVICE
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
190-180-999-5214
101.07
37.03
253.66
390.30
391.76
390.30
56613
56614
56614
56614
56614
56614
56614
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
003017
000622
000622
000622
000622
000622
000622
BALDERSON, SCOTT
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ELECTRICAL SVC- TCC
ELECTRICAL SVC-RANCHO VISTA PK
ELECTRICAL SERVICES - CRC
ELECTRICAL SVCS-PARKS
ELECTRICAL SVC-PARKS
ELECTRICAL SERVICES - CRC
190-183-999-5330
190-184-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
160.00
67.50
230.50
67.50
90.00
45.00
155.00
160.00
655.50
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56615
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56616
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56618
56619
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
001374
VENDOR
NAME
BORROEL, TRACEY
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CALIF SECRETARY OF STAT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
WORKERS' COMP FOR JUNE 99
f99 TEM PUBLIC FAC CORP FEES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-4984
001-2380
165-2380
190-2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
165-2500
190-2500
191-2500
192-2500
193-2500
194-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
001-2370
165-2370
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
194-2370
280-2370
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370
340-2370
001-1182
190-181-999-5112
001-140-999-5226
ITEM
AMOUNT
65.00
1,326.17
37.20
216.90
.75
1.93
23.12
10.86
16.41
7.12
37.35
8.08
27.52
1,851.11
51.94
302.76
1.05
2.70
32.26
15.14
22.90
9.94
52.14
11.28
38.42
3,626.67
88.88
1,098.76
.67
1.69
40.11
16.64
32.99
6.81
59.86
11.34
253.06
28.24
4.48
10.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
65.00
4,105.05
5,270.20
10.00
56620
56620
56620
56620
56620
56620
56620
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
568.76
13.01
103.46
.33
.98
10.63
5.84
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56620
56620
56620
56620
56620
56621
56621
56621
56621
56622
56623
56623
56623
56624
56624
56624
56625
56625
56625
56625
56626
56626
56626
56626
56626
56626
56626
56626
56627
56627
56628
56629
56630
56630
56631
56632
56633
12:57
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
000135
000135
000135
000135
002989
003712
003712
003712
001193
001193
001193
002405
002405
002405
002405
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
001923
001923
001014
002631
003573
003573
001233
002701
VENDOR
NAME
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEA
COLTON SURVEYING INSTRU
COLTON SURVEYING INSTRU
COLTON SURVEYING INSTRU
COMP U S A INC
COMP U S A INC
COMP U S A INC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
CONVERSE CONSULTANTS
CONVERSE CONSULTANTS
COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
COUNTS UNLIMITED INC
DANKEL, AMY K.
DANKEL, AMY K.
DANS FEED & SEED INC
DELASKI, ESTELLA
DIVERSIFIED RISK
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
SIGNS FOR NEW CIP HOTLINE NO.
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING-C.HAL
TRIPOD & ROD'S CIP DIVISION
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
MICROSOFT SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
BATTERY FOR DELTEC UPS
LABOR TO INSTALL BATTERIES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
MOBILE RADIO TK930HD
ANTENNA & CABLE KIT FOR RADIO
SPEAKER & SWITCH KIT FOR RADIO
LABOR TO INSTALL RADIO/ANTENNA
SALES TAX
RADIOS FOR NEW CITY VEHICLES
BASE RADIO STATION:MNTC FAC
BASE RADIO STATION:MNTC FAC
MAY GEOTECHNICAL SVC:MARGARITA
GEOTECHNICAL SVCS:LIBRARY SITE
CAST CITY SEALS:MARG/WINCH PRK
JUN 99 TRAFFIC COUNT CONSUS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS
REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP
JUNE 99 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
340-199-701-5212
001-165-999-5242
001-165-999-5242
001-165-999-5242
320-199-999-5211
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5211
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
340-199-701-5610
340-199-701-5610
340-199-701-5610
340-199-701-5610
340-199-701-5610
001-162-999-5610
001-162-999-5610
001-162-999-5610
210-190-154-5804
210-199-129-5802
190-180-999-5244
001-164-602-5406
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-164-601-5218
190-183-4984
300-2180
ITEM
AMOUNT
6.49
3.24
13.00
6.50
15.26
231.34
1,228.35
139.54
63.57
45.00
1,248.00
15.00
96.72
1,933.83
314.29
209.92
1,036.00
360.00
47.31
80.29
882.00
65.00
85.00
150.00
79.98
2,470.28
1,656.12
742.71
765.00
1,800.00
908.98
580.00
216.00
720.00
34.13
75. O0
87.18
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
747.50
1,662.80
45.00
1,359.72
2,458.04
1,523.60
6,131.09
2,565.00
908.98
580.00
936.00
34.13
75.00
87.18
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56634
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56635
56636
56637
56638
56639
56639
56639
56640
56640
56640
56640
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
56641
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
001673
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
002390
002079
002939
003623
003623
003623
002037
002037
002037
002037
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
VENDOR
NAME
DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S
E S
E S
E S
E S
ES
E S
E S
E S
E S
ES
E S
E S
E S
E S
ES
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
ELIZABETH HOSPICE
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R
EXCEL HARDWARE
EXCEL HARDWARE
EXCEL HARDWARE
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS ]NC
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 06/27 WIGHTMAN
TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 GORMAN
TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 WILLJAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 06/04 GORMAN
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 MILES
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 MILES
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 MILES
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 DEGANGE
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 SERVEN
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 SERVEN
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 SERVEN
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 06/18 MENDOZA
ADDITIONAL CHRGES:OVRLD DR SWR
98-99 COMMUNITY SVC FUNDING
ANNUAL USER CF:7/26-30:K.8EAL
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - OLD TWN
CREDIT: RETURNED ITEMS
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW MAINT
32 BUTTON SERIES E DTERM PHONE
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TELEPHONE MAINT & REPAIRS
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-111-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-1990
001-163-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
330-1990
340-199-701-5118
210-165-604-5804
001-101-999-5267
001-161-999-5261
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
001-164-601-5218
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5215
001-162-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-1990
001-164-604-5230
001-165-999-5230
001-164-604-5230
001-165-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
320-199-999-5230
ITEM
AMOUNT
260.00
561.06
385.16
385.16
166.60
166.60
1,474.68
120.94
423.29
423.29
2,858.40
375.84
375.84
742.72
442.00
458.58
2,350.01
2,500.00
300.00
15.00
1.02-
646.39
1,944.00
38.88
150.66
48.00
8.50
92.25
17.75
26.75
12.75
16.25
11.00
42.50
23.75
53.75
44.50
12.75
14.70
CHECK
AMOUNT
260.00
9,360.16
2,350.01
2,500.00
300.00
660.37
2,181.54
377.20
56642
56642
56642
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
000166
000166
000166
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
LOT BOOK REPRT:CAMINO VERDE
LOT BOOK REPT: RUSTIC GLEN DR.
LOT BOOK REPT: WINCH CREEK AVE
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
150.00
150.00
150.00
450.00
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56643
56643
56643
56644
56645
56646
56647
56647
56647
56647
56647
56647
56647
56647
56648
56649
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56650
56651
56652
56653
56653
56653
56653
56653
56653
12:57
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
001989
001989
001989
000184
003531
002528
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
002174
001697
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
VENDOR
NAME
FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC
FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC
FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GATEWAY
GLASS BLASTERS
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS
HALL, NANCY LEE
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE [NC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HARBRO INC.
HARRIS, MICHELLE
HIGHMARK INC
HIGHMARK INC
HIGHMARK INC
HIGHMARK INC
HIGHMARK INC
HIGHMARK INC
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
20' CYBEX CABLE SET
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
909 699-1370 SVC FOR COP
EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCHASE PGM
CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES
QTY 200 INTEROFFICE ENVELOPES
QTY 400 INTEROFFICE ENVELOPES
SALES TAX
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR DEPT
GREAT RACE VIDEO PRODUCTION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW ST MAIN
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - SKATE PRK
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CRC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PARKS
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - SR CENTER
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW INSPECT
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
TABLE SAW-FOR VARIOUS USAGE
REFD OVRPMT OF FEES B99-1437
REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP
002107 VL ADVAN
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5208
001-1175
001-150-999-5265
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-1990
001-150-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
280-199-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
001-171-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
340-199-701-5212
190-183-999-5305
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5242
190-181-999-5242
190-182-999-5242
190-184-999-5242
340-199-701-5242
340-199-702-5242
001-164-603-5242
001-164-603-5242
001-2660
190-183-4984
001-2510
001-2510
190-2510
192-2510
193-2510
194-2510
ITEM
AMOUNT
250.00
23.15
19.38
61.59
1,979.37
15.09
44.80
98.40
11.10
576.84
446.00
228.42
141.12
120.27
236.50
128.00
12.54
241.47
289.74
139.04
551.98
861.31
2.90
219.76
19.05
110.96
56.67
56.67
141.66
85.00
56.67
84.99
.01-
25.67
80.00
198.15
180.35
7.68
.34
1.70
3.40
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
292.53
61.59
1,979.37
15.09
1,666.95
236.50
128.00
2,930.40
25.67
8O.00
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56653
56653
56653
56653
56653
56653
56653
56653
56654
56654
56654
56654
56655
56656
56657
12:57
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
002107 HIGHMARK INC
000194
000194
000194
000194
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
003737 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
003757 INSURANCE COMPANY OF TH
001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VL REVER
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
MICROSOFT OFFICE TRAINING
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS
56658 07/08/99 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
56659
56660
56661
56662
56663
56663
56663
56664
56664
000388 INTL CONFERANCE OF BUIL
000501 INTL INSTITUTE OF MUNIC
001186 IRWIN, JOHN
003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
002023 KING, WENDE
002023 KING, WENDE
000206 KINKOS INC
000206 KINKOS INC
000206 KINKOS INC
000206 KINKOS INC
000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC
003741 LA MESA TRANSFER & STOR
003054 LYNDE ORDWAY
003054 LYNDE ORDWAY
003054 LYNDE ORDWAY
56665
56665
56665
56665
56666
56667
56668
56668
56668
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
UNIFORM FIRE CODE EXAM:PISTER
MEMBERSHIP:S.JONES/M.BALLREICH
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MAY BIOLOGICAL SVCS:PALA BRDGE
PLAN CHECK SVCS: APR-JUN 99
JUN WORKERS' COMP COVERAGE
JUN WORKERS' COMP COVERAGE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
MISC LDSCP & MAINT SUPPLIES
ASST CITY MGR MOVING EXPENSES
DRILL BITS FOR PAPER DRILL
CUTTING STICKS
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-2510
001-2510
001-2510
190-2510
192-2510
193-2510
194-2510
340-2510
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
320-199-999-5261
300-199-999-5207
190-182-999-5212
001-2140
001-171-999-5261
001-120-999-5226
190-183-999-5330
210-165-631-5801
001-163-999-5248
001-1182
001-1182
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5222
001-164-601-5218
001-110-999-5250
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
4.68
198.15-
180.35
7.68
.34
1.70
3.40
4.68
2,189.16
18.75
263.88
32.91
680.00
24,467.69
189.64
276.90
115.00
170.00
400.00
2,320.03
3,325.00
13.41-
14.83-
156.80
243.20
45.26
38.63
7.27
82.97
138.71
4,711.93
87.00
4.60
7.10
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
396.30
2,504.70
680.00
24,467.69
189.64
276.90
115.00
170.00
400.00
2,320.03
3,296.76
400.00
174.13
138.71
4,711.93
98.70
56669 07/08/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP (2)W/E 6/20 BELIAN 001-171-999-5118 550.31
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56669
56670
56671
56671
56672
56672
56672
56672
56672
56672
56672
56672
56673
56674
56674
56675
56675
56676
56677
56677
56677
56677
56677
56678
56679
56679
56680
56680
56681
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
12:57
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
002693 MATROS, ANDREA
000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I
000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 6/20 BELIAN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
2 HOUSING BOXES FOR SIGN PANEL
SALES TAX
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP
001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
002105
002105
002105
002105
002105
001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
002993 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QU
002993 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QU
000733 PARTY PZAZZ
000733 PARTY PZAZZ
PAYNE, CARRIE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
COBRA/JULY/DENTAL/GREEK
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
BUSINESS CARDS:K.KRUEGER
SALES TAX
DISPLAY ADS:CIP CONST.UPDATES
SUB:167009:CITY MGR:5/31-6/28
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:233144
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
RECRUITMENT ADS:ENGINEERING
MAY DESIGN SVCS:RC S/B RAMP
CREDIT:OVERHEAD-EXCESS OF 10%
RENTAL SUPPLIES:CIP WKSHP:6/IO
RENTAL SUPPLIES:CIP WKSHP:6/29
REFUND: AQUATICS-SYNCHRONIZED
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 CIGNA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5118
190-183-999-5330
001-164-601-5402
001-164-601-5402
001-2340
165-2340
190-2340
193-2340
280-2340
300-2340
340-2340
001-1180
190-183-999-5330
320-199-999-5220
320-199'999-5220
001-165-999-5256
001-110-999-5228
001-164-604-5228
001-164-604-5214
001-161-999-5214
001-162'999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-150-999-5254
001-165-999-5248
001-165-999-5248
001-150-999-5260
001-150'999-5260
190-183-4975
001-2090
165-2090
190-2090
194-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
ITEM
AMOUNT
366.88
352.80
600.00
46.50
3,131.26
103.83
287.48
21.72
62.29
20,76
83.06
83.06
288.00
102.50
7.94
552.15
9.67
84.00
45,53
15.95
15.95
225.41
161.35
452.88
8,133.28
8.85-
105.00
88.00
75.00
852.69
217.16
251,60
83.86
72.38
1,356.10
377.58
5.05
761.72
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
917.19
352.80
646.50
3,793.46
288.00
110.44
561.82
84.00
464.19
452.88
8,124.43
193.00
75. O0
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56682
56683
56684
56685
56686
56686
56686
56686
56686
56686
56686
56686
56686
12:57
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
001958
000247
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
VENDOR
NAME
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO
PESTMASTER
POTTER, MARK
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000245 CIGNA
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 NELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 KAISER
000245 KAISER
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PC
000245 PERS CHO
000245 PERS DED
000245 PERS-ADM
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 CIGNA
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 KAISER
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PERS CHO
000245 PERS REV
001958 PERS L-T
WEED ABATEMENT:CRC CHANNEL
REIMB:REFRESHMENTS:JOLT PRGM
RECRUITMENT ADS:ACCOUNTANT/PRK
RECRUITMENT ADS:ACCOUNTANT/PRK
PUBLIC NOTICE:OLD TOWN
PUBLIC NOTICE:IS-16
PUBLIC NOTICE:99-17
PUBLIC NOTICE:99-13
PUBLIC NOTICE:99-11
PUBLIC NOTICE:ELECT CODE
PUBLIC NOTICE:99-15
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
300-2090
001-2090
190-2090
191-2090
192-2090
193-2090
194-2090
280-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2122
190-180-999-5416
001-170-999-5235
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
ITEM
AMOUNT
40.84
6,319.19
829.53
16.44
54.31
433.33
263.07
5.45
164.41
872.18
2,235.98
164.83
5,204.76
804.79
19.83
562.00
2,545.17
1,297.97
123.69
43.82
111.43
37.14
18.92
83.52
115.83
333.41
57.86
27.42
8.48
277.20
31.81
1.67
168.84
1,317.35-
205.37
1,737.00
8O.0O
487.15
784.26
6.25
6.75
7.25
8.25
10.25
9.75
12.00
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
25,935.91
205.37
1,737.00
8O.O0
1,331.91
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56687
56688
56689
56689
56690
56691
56691
56692
56693
56694
56695
56696
56696
56696
56697
56697
56697
56698
56699
56703
56704
56704
56704
56704
56705
56706
56707
56708
56708
56708
56708
56708
56708
12:57
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002110
002776
003308
003308
000260
000907
000907
003742
000418
000268
000955
000955
000955
000271
000271
000271
000277
002743
000645
000645
000645
000645
000537
000465
003318
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
VENDOR
NAME
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME MATRIX ]NC
R D 0 RENTAL COMPANY
R D 0 RENTAL COMPANY
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO ELEMENTARY SCHO0
REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORA
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE
RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF BI
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF BI
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF B[
ROBERT BEIN WM FROST &
ROBERT BEIN ~M FROST &
ROBERT BEIN WM FROST &
S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
SCHLANSKY, JEFF
SMART & FINAL INC
SMART & FINAL INC
SMART & FINAL INC
SMART & FINAL INC
SO CALIF EDISON
STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN
TARTAGLIA, MARIO
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CREW
MAY:SC-5001377-O:SR VAN
EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CREW
EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT CREW
RUBBER STAMP:"READ THIS NOTICE
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
LOAN SVCS:IST HOMEBUYER PRGM
NTC.EXEMPT FILING FEES:RC/I-15
JUNE 99 K-RAT PAYMENT
JUN ~99 BIKE PATROL
TEM.RODEO PATROL:5/29-30/99
SPECIAL EVENT SUPERVISION:6/13
MAY PROF.ENG.SVCS:E.I.R.
MAY PROF.ENG.SVCS:E.I.R.
MAY ENG SVCS:PALA BRIDGE:97-15
MISC CRAFT SUPPLIES
LOCKSMITH SERVICES:MARG. PARK
REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP
MISC. REC. SUPPLIES:SENIOR CTR
MISC. REC. SUPPLIES:DAY CAMP
MISC. REC. SUPPLIES:DAY CAMP
MISC. REC. SUPPLIES:TINY TOTS
JUN:2-18-528-9980:SANTIAGO RD
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5238
190-180-999-5208
001-164-601-5238
001-164-601-5238
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5263
001-161-999-5214
190-2900
165-199-999-5449
210-165-605-5801
001-2300
001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5370
001-170-999-5370
165-199-999-5248
280-199-999-5248
210-165-631-5801
190-183-999-5340
190-180-999-5212
190-183-4984
190-181-999-5301
190-183-999-5340
190-183-999-5340
190-183-999-5320
191-180-999-5319
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-2125
190-2125
191-2125
192-2125
193-2125
194-2125
ITEM
AMOUNT
149.69
39.00
348.58
168.90
216.58
20.74
20.74
100.00
3,000.00
78.00
24,480.00
3,143.00
1,706.20
236.64
79.50
79.50
3,000.00
340.76
55.24
135.00
189.38
88.65
3.49
63.48
167.33
456.00
672.00
471.50
82.00
1.03
2.05
14.35
3.07
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
149.69
39.00
517.48
216.58
41.48
100.00
3,000.00
78.00
24,480.00
5,085.84
3,159.00
340.76
55.24
135.00
345.00
167.33
456.00
672.00
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56708
56708
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56709
56710
56710
56710
56711
56711
56712
56713
56713
56713
56713
56713
56713
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56714
56715
56715
56715
56715
56715
56715
56715
12:57
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
001547
001547
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000307
000307
000307
000306
000306
002111
000319
000319
000319
000319
000319
000319
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
VENDOR
NAME
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
TEMECULA TROPHY COHPANY
TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
TOGOS RESTAURANT
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
CERTIFICATE FOLDERS
DIE SET UP CHARGE
SALES TAX
MISC HARDWARE & MAINT SUPPLIES
MISC HARDWARE & MAINT SUPPLIES
REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL WORKSHOP
DRK GREEN OPEN MESH WINDSCREEN
OPTIONAL AIR VENTS
OPTIONAL CENTER TAB TAPE
LABOR
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-2125
330-2125
001-1020
165-1020
190-1020
194-1020
193-1020
280-1020
300-1020
320-1020
330-1020
340-1020
001-1020
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-100-999-5260
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
192-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
ITEM
AMOUNT
20.50
20.50
2,924.08
290.00
591.65
20.00
1.00
190.00
10.00
350.00
80.O0
5.00
4.00-
310.00
50.00
27.90
2.32
9.42
83.63
1,876.31
86.00
196.00
1,700.00
174.24
167.27
131.26
3.01
23.89
.08
.23
2.45
1.34
1.49
.74
3.00
1.50
3.51
7,972.92
210.23
1,635.17
2.50
33.99
25.00
85.23
PAGE 10
CHECK
AMOUNT
615.00
4,457.73
387.90
11.74
83.63
4,199.82
172.50
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12:57
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
56715 07/08/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56715 07/08/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56715 07/08/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56716
56716
56716
56716
56716
56716
56716
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56717
56718
56719
56719
56719
56719
56719
56719
56719
56720
56720
56720
56720
56720
56720
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
56721
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002065
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
001881
001342
001342
001342
001601
56722
56722
56722
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
UNISOURCE
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA
VAN TECN ENGINEERING SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING SA
WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS I
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
WINDOWS NT MAGAZINE
56723
56724
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
PAPER SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING:PW
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING:PW
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING:PW
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
PROF. SERVICES:CIR ELEM UPDATE
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:279393
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
001-100-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-170-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-164-604-5230
001-111-999-5230
330-199-999-5220
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
300-2120
320-2120
330-2120
001-163-999-5242
001-163-999-5242
001-164-602-5242
001-165-999-5242
001-163-999-5242
001-164-602-5242
190-183-999-5310
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
001-161-999-5248
320-199-999-5228
ITEM
AMOUNT
83.33
666.66
158.33
1,484.56
45.81
1,654.64
12.03
168.66
39.48
93.46
2.20
64.38
102.88
41.86
311.44
20.02
76.92
231.91
82.22
467.45
183.96
10.02
2,180.84
224.68
3.75
20.59
1.73
.25
4.00
5.00
80.65
105.93
39.70
5.85
7.68
2.88
119.02
41.69
54.41
284.64
17,000.00
49.95
PAGE 11
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,873.36
3,498.64
1,595.26
2,180.84
260.00
242.69
119.02
380.74
17,000.00
49.95
VOUCHRE2
07/08/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56725
56725
56725
56725
12:57
CHECK
DATE
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
07/08/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000345
000345
000345
000345
VENDOR
NAME
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC XEROX SUPPLIES
JUN COPIER LEASE:5021
JUN LEASE OF 5100 COPIER
INTEREST ON LEASE OF 5100
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-199-999-5220
190-184'999-5239
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
ITEM
AMOUNT
290.93
67.08
1,780.57
339.46
PAGE 12
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,478.04
TOTAL CHECKS 251,960.28
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 I~FORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
122,170.81
2w705.33
52,415.23
11,837.69
25,858.98
5,917.51
372.61
4,085.00
8,891.34
796.04
12,286.05
4,584.46
2,832.93
TOTAL 254,753.98
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99 13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INBTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
990805 07/15/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
000444 SDI 001-2070 77.30
000444 SDI 165-2070 2.80
000444 SDI 190-2070 107.61
000444 SDI 280-2070 .71
000444 SDI 320-2070 11.24
000444 SDI 330-2070 2.63
000444 SDI 340-2070 6.25
000444 STATE 001-2070 5,903.14
000444 STATE 165-2070 130.71
000444 STATE 190-2070 833.64
000444 STATE 191-2070 1.36
000444 STATE 192-2070 3.30
000444 STATE 193-2070 63.59
000444 STATE 194-2070 21.38
000444 STATE 280-2070 55.26
000444 STATE 300-2070 15.74
000444 STATE 320-2070 237.99
000444 STATE 330-2070 27.91
000444 STATE 340-2070 130.60
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 21,585.43
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 446.57
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 4,706.69
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 8.26
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 21.16
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 327.93
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 125.50
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 200.69
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 48.34
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 1,018.17
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 143.03
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 602.58
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 5,318.64
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 140.90
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,421.83
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 2.34
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 6.03
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 80.09
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 34.16
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 67.17
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 25.03
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 210.06
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 43.64
990806 07/15/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 150.71
56728 07/15/99 003370 A I C P A
AIRGAS FIRE PROTECTION
56729 07/15/99 003394
MEMBERSHIP:WILLIAM PATTISON JR
CITY HALL FIRE SYSTEM TESTING
001-140-999-5226 120.00
340-199-701-5250 600.00
7,633.16
36,734.95
120.00
600.00
56730 07/15/99 003706 AMBIENT AVL INC MAINT FOR OLD TWN SOUND SYSTEM 001-164-603-5212 3,500.00 3,500.00
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99 13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56731 07/15/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
56731 07/15/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
56732 07/15/99 003745 APPRAISALS UNLIMITED
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56733 07/15/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
56734 07/15/99 000586 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY
56734 07/15/99 000586 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY
56735 07/15/99 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS
56736 07/15/99 003713 BULLET PAINTING
56737 07/15/99 003138 CAL MAT
56738 07/15/99 003214 CAL MAT
56739 07/15/99 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVAT
56739 07/15/99 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVAT
56739 07/15/99 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVAT
56740 07/15/99 001062 CALIF STATE OF
TEMP HELP W/E 06/26 WILLCOX
TEMP HELP W/E 06/26 WORTHEN
COMMERCIAL APPRAISALS-OLD TOWN
TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE
TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE
TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE
TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE
TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE
TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE
CRDT:CHRG SALES TAX ON RESALE
MUNICIPAL CODE BOOK SERVICE
MUNICIPAL CODE BOOK SERVICE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
FACADE IMPROV PRGM:OAK PARK
PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS
SUPPLIES FOR PW PATCH TRUCK
JAN-MAR 99 STRONG MOTION PMT
JAN-MAR 99 STRONG MOTION PMT
LESS PROCESSING FEES
CONTROLLER'S CONFIRMATION FEE
190-1990
190-180-999-5118
280-199-813-5804
001-1665
001-1665
001-1665
001-1665
001-1665
001-1665
001-1665
001-120-999-5250
001-1990
190-183-999-5330
280-199-813-5804
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-2280
001-2290
001-162-4229
001-140-999-5220
423.20
92.88
1,400.00
914.80
892.00
540.75
529.60
976.50
2,709.00
65.80-
2,020.36
185.79
271.20
4,800.00
1,227.60
4,073.11
8,182.91
3,855.68
601.88-
100.00
516.08
1,400.00
6,496.85
2,206.15
271.20
4,800.00
1,227.60
4,073.11
11,436.71
100.00
56741 07/15/99 001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY WELDING SERVS & SUPPLIES
190-184-999-5301
11.90
11.90
56742 07/15/99 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY I JUNE CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES 300-199-999-5205
585.50
585.5O
56743 07/15/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRESHMENTS:LAND DEVEL MTG 001-161-999-5260
56743 07/15/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRESHMENTS FOR STAFF MTG 001-161-999-5260
99.57
16.44
116.01
56744 07/15/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING: CRC 190-182-999-5250
56744 07/15/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERV]C QTRLY FIRE SYS INSPECT: CRC 190-182-999-5250
56744 07/15/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING: SR CENTER 190-181-999-5250
50.00
150.00
45.00
245.00
56745 07/15/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A ]NC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263
56745 07/15/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-604-5263
56745 07/15/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263
56745 07/15/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263
56745 07/15/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263
31.27
18.53
17.38
15.86
52.45
135.49
56746 07/15/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS SOFTBALLS FOR CRC 190-180-999-5301
56746 07/15/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301
56746 07/15/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5301
340.00
40.00
26.35
406.35
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56747
56748
56749
56749
56749
56750
56750
56750
56750
56751
56752
56753
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
001139
001275
000442
000442
000442
000447
000447
000447
000447
003068
CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY
COMPUSERVE INC
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
CONKLIN, SHELLY
DEHAAN, DOREEN
DILLON CONSULTING ENGIN
PHOTO SHOOT OF CITY BUSINESSES
SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE
ALARM MONITORING:CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING: MNTC FAC
ALARM MONITORING: TCC
KENWOOD BASE STATION:STN 84
ANTENNA & CABLES FOR BASE STN
LABOR TO INSTALL BASE STATION
SALES TAX
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFD:GYMNASTICS-KINDER TUMBLER
CONSULTING SERVICES - MALL
001-111-999-5270
320-199-999-5221
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-184-999-5250
320-1950
320-1950
320-1950
320-1950
190-2900
190-183-4982
001-162-999-5250
640.57
9.95
210.00
135.00
210.00
1,242.00
295.00
390.00
119.12
100.00
56.00
450.00
640.57
9.95
555.00
2,046.12
100.00
56.00
450.00
56754
56754
56754
56754
56754
56755
56755
56755
56755
56755
56756
56757
56757
56757
56757
56757
56757
56757
56757
56757
56758
56758
56758
56758
56758
56758
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
002939
002939
002939
002939
002939
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
002037
002037
002037
002037
002037
002037
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
TEMP HELP W/E 6/18 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 6/18 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 6/18 GORMAN
TEMP HELP W/E 6/25 KEELEY
TEMP HELP W/E 6/25 KEELEY
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R SPAT CLASS: KELLI BEAL
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R SPAT CLASS: KELLI BEAL
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R SPAT CLASS: JOHN DeGANGE
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R DS-MOVB CLASS: KELLI BEAL
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R DS-MOVB CLASS:JOHN DeGANGE
EWlNG-SANCHEZ, JACQUELY REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
DUCK POND:MONTHLY LDSCP MNTC
LDSCP REPAIRS:SPTS PRK/SOCCER
LDSCP REPAIRS: TCC
LDSCP REPAIRS: WINCHESTER RD
LDSCP REPAIRS:RANCHO CALIF
LDSCP REPAIRS:RANCHO CA MEDIAN
LDSCP REPAIRS:SONOMA/MARGARITA
IRRIGATION REPAIRS:DUCK POND
LDSCP REPAIRS: CRC MAIN LINE
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
EXPANETS
32 BUTTON SERIES E DTERM PHONE
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TELEPHONE MAINT & REPAIRS
TELEPHONE MAINT & REPAIRS
TELEPHONE MAINT & REPAIRS
001-161-999-5118
001-1990
001-1990
001-163-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-610-5261
001-1990
001-161-610-5261
001-161-610-5261
001-161-610-5261
190-2900
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-184-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
392.04
392.04
2,035.74
122.24
1,100.16
653.00
397.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
100.00
1,155.00
179.42
488.88
66.72
136.56
65.63
119.85
1,148.14
160.42
1,944.00
38.88
150.66
88.00
44.00
48.00
4,042.22
4,650.00
100.00
3,520.62
2,313.54
56759 07/15/99 000478 FAST SIGNS OLD TOWN STREET SIGNS 280-199-999-5362 1,080.45
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99 13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56759 07/15/99 000478
56760 07/15/99 000165
56760 07/15/99 000165
56760 07/15/99 000165
56760 07/15/99 000165
56760 07/15/99 000165
FAST SIGNS
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
VIP VEHICLE SIGNS:4TH OF JULY
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
190-183-999-5370
001-164-604-5230
001-165-999-5230
280-1990
001-162-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
142.23
12.75
29.00
24.00
47.75
11.00
1,222.68
124.50
56761 07/15/99
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE REFD:WEED ABATEMENT PAID TWICE 001-1215
314.00
314.00
56762 07/15/99 003397 FIRE ENGINEERING
1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION: H.WINDSOR 001-171-999-5228
19.95
19.95
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56763 07/15/99 003347
56764 07/15/99 000184
56764 07/15/99 000184
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
XXXX-9798 J.STONE:INT'L COUNCI
XXXX-9798 J.STONE:LEAGUE OF CI
XXXX-9798 J.STONE:TSR WIRELESS
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:AIR ONT/S.J.
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:ONT/SJ STONE
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:DBTREE NASHV
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:AIRPORT PRKG
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:LEAGUE OF CI
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:METROLINK
XXXX-9913 G.ROBERTS:FRANKLIN
XXXX-6165 G.YATES:VINEYARD:VON
XXXX-6165 G.YATES:MIMI'S CAFE
XX-1405 D.UBNOSKE:SIZZLER/MARG
XXXX-1143 H.PARKER:ROCKY COLA
909 506-1941PTA CD TTACSD
909 695-3539 COPT
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-1990
001-150-999-5260
001-150-999-5265
001-161-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
220.00-
225.00
42.02
98.00
98.00
602.40
47.00
505.00
9.50
42.02
67.64
152.00
70.80
31.68
56.81
37.18
1,771.06
93.99
56765 07/15/99 001355
56765 07/15/99 001355
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56766 07/15/99 000177
56767 07/15/99 001609
G T E CALIFORNIA INC
G T E CALIFORNIA INC
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GREATER ALARM COMPANY I
JUL ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE
JUL ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - CITY CLERK
OFFICE SUPPLIES - CITY CLERK
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING
OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT
SALES TAX
OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES - INFO SYSTEM
OFFICE SUPPLIES - RECORDS MGMT
SKATE PARK ALARM MONITORING
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-120-999-5220
001-1990
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-1990
001-161-999-5220
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5220
001-171-999-5220
001-171-999-5220
001-171-999-5220
320-199-999-5221
001-120-999-5277
190-180-999-5250
320.00
320.00
113.61
78.04
239.60
17.11
79.44
44.22
81.86
6.34
48.85
138.92
48.67
167.94
564.66
47.41
105.00
640.00
1,676.67
105.00
56768 07/15/99 002372 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 732.00
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56768
56769
56770
56771
56772
56772
56773
56774
56775
56776
56777
56778
56779
56780
56780
56780
56780
56781
56781
56781
56782
56782
56783
56784
56785
56786
56787
56788
56789
56789
13:01
CHECK
DATE
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002372
000963
003159
003695
003695
002140
003280
002789
003631
001719
003286
002634
002634
002634
002634
003054
003054
003054
003428
003428
000217
000883
003613
002139
002139
VENDOR
NAME
HARMON, JUDY
HOGAN, DAVID
HOUSTON, JOHN
HURST, RYAN
J WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE
J WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JOHNSON, HEATHER
JON LASKIN BAND
KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION
KLEINFELDER INC
L P A INC
LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI
LITELINES INC
LITELINES INC
LITELINES INC
LITELINES INC
LYNDE ORDWAY
LYNDE ORDWAY
LYNDE ORDWAY
M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MORIN, LEAH
MOVIE EXPERIENCE
MURRIETA VALLEY HEAT SO
NATIONWIDE REHAB & REST
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REIMB:APA NAT'L CF:4/24-28/99
REFUND: LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS
EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCH PRGM
TREE TRIMMING VARIOUS LOCATION
TREE TRIMMING VARIOUS LOCATION
E-MAIL SVCS & SUPPORT/GERSHON
REFUND: LEVEL 3 SWIM LESSONS
SUMMER CONCERT SERIES MUSIC
TEMP HELP 6/30 MUELLER
MAY GEOTECHNICAL SVCS:PALA BRD
DESIGN SVCS:TEM LIBRARY PRJT
JUN SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT
GLASS FOR MONUMENT FLOOD LIGHT
175 WATT MH LAMPS
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
MBM 305A PAPER FOLDER
1YR NAINTENANCE CONTRACT
SALES TAX
SHUTTLE:INTERVIEWER:MUSEUM MGR
SHUTTLE:INTERVIEWER:MUSEUM MGR
JUN ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS
20 YDS SAND:FIREWORKS SHOW
REFUND: SUMNER DAY CAMP
MUPPETS/SPACE TCKTS:DAY CAMP
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
RES.INPROVEMENT PRGM:PATTERSON
DISPLAY ADS:VAR.CIP UPDATES
ADS:4TH OF JULY/CONCERT SERIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-1990
001-161-999-5258
190-183-4975
001-1175
001-164-601-5402
001-164-601-5402
320-199-999-5211
190-183-4975
190-183-999-5320
001-120-999-5118
210-165-631-5801
210-199-129-5802
001-101-999-5285
190-199-999-5212
190-199-999-5212
190-199-999-5212
190-199-999-5212
330-1940
330-1940
330-1940
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5212
190-183-4984
190-183-999-5340
190-2900
165-199-813-5804
001-165-999-5256
190-180-999-5254
iTEM
AMOUNT
364.00
220.90
22.00
1,618.14
7,755.00
1,745.00
300.00
15.00
125.00
239.20
2,925.00
1,160.00
1,162.80
308.00
224.00
58.55
41.23
3,250.00
200.00
251.88
77.05
77.05
2,706.00
520.00
145.00
369.00
100.00
425.00
507.37
364.14
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,096.00
220.90
22.00
1,618.14
9,500.00
300.00
15.00
125.00
239.20
2,925.00
1,160.00
1,162.80
631.78
3,701.88
154.10
2,706.00
520.00
145.00
369.00
100.00
425.00
871.51
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
07/15/99 13:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56790 07/15/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214
559.51
559.51
56791 07/15/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES INC JUN CONSULTING SERVICES 165-199-999-5248
56791 07/15/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES INC JUN CONSULTING SERVICES 280-199-999-5248
56791 07/15/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES INC JUN CONSULTING SERVICES 001-111-999-5248
56791 07/15/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES INC JUN CONSULTING SERVICES 001-111-999-5248
914.57
914.57
322.79
.01
2,151.94
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 190-180-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-170-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-100-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 190-180-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-170-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-162-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-100-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-164-601-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-170-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 190-180-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-110-999-5238
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-150-999-5250
56792 07/15/99 001561 PAGENET JUL-SEPT PAGING SVCS/RENTALS 001-1990
56.44
25.50
3.00
41.32
25.50
37.50
19.50
75.60
102.48
377.82
40.80
40.80
40.80
887.06
56793 07/15/99 000733 PARTY PZAZZ
RENTAL EQUIPMENT:4TH OF JULY 190-180-999-5238
603.00
603.00
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390
56794 07/15/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390
8.84
24,215.02
642.91
4.77
3,765.14
12.30
31.46
392.82
182.29
1.43
279.64
120.97
700.86
131.98
478.83
100.64
2.80
5.62
39.33
8.44
84.73
1.87
14.79
.05
.14
1.53
.84
.92
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56794
56794
56794
56794
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
56796
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
000246
000246
000246
000246
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH RE]MBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH RE]MBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-140-999-5208
001-140-999-5260
001-140-999-5260
001-162-999-5220
001-150-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
001-111-999-5260
001-120-999-5220
001-150-999-5265
280-199-999-5220
001-140-999-5260
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5261
001-110-999-5260
190-181-999-5301
001-140-999-5220
001-170-999-5235
001-170-999-5244
001-171-999-5261
001-162-999-5260
001-140-999-5260
001-162-999-5261
001-164-601-5250
.46
1.86
.93
2.18
6.00
31.24
25.00
18.51
9.93
8,50
20.00
2.14
50,00
17.22
30.09
9.69
9.30
28.00
16.23
22.92
10.00
26.29
15.00
50.00
35.00
7.18
32.53
31,236.39
480.77
56798
56798
56798
56799
56799
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
000580
000580
000580
002354
002354
PHOTO WORKS
PHOTO WORKS
PHOTO WORKS
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
JUN PHOTO PROCESSING:TCSD
JUN PHOTO PROCESSING:CIP
JUN PHOTO PROCESSING:LAND
CRIME PREVENTION SUPPLIES
FREIGHT
190-180-999-5301
001-165-999-5250
001-163-999-5250
001-170-999-5292
001-170-999-5292
106.80
42.79
10.86
450.00
40.50
160.45
490.50
56800
56800
56800
56800
56800
56800
56801
56801
56802
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
000253
000253
000253
000253
000253
000253
000254
000254
000254
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
DISPLAY ADS:CIP UPDATES
DISPLAY AD:4TH OF JULY
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:1633708
001-120-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-165-999-5230
001-165-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-120-999-5277
001-165-999-5256
190-180-999-5254
001-120-999-5228
48.00
74.00
15.75
15.75
11.75
15.75
378.00
84.00
128.45
181.00
462.00
128.45
56803 07/15/99 002841 RAIN FOR RENT IRRIGATION FOR FIREWORKS 190-180-999-5238 1,689.20
56803 07/15/99 002841 RAIN FOR RENT SALES TAX 190-180-999-5238 84.41 1,773.61
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
07/15/99 13:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:O1-O5-OO111-O:WINCH.RD LSC 190-180-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:Ol-O6-84860-5:PUJOL STREET 280-199-807-5801
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:O1-O2-98000-O:STN #84 001'171-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:O1-O2-98010-O:STN #84 001-171-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 001-164-603-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-181-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-184-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-185-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
56804 07/15/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
56805 07/15/99 001628 REBEL RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL:SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5238
35.89
49.28
10.65
261.21
314.52
7,053.46
146.92
1,035.44
339.50
263.68
2,475.48
516.78
68.40
3,219.71
56.97
2,213.61
35.00
18,061.50
35.00
56806 07/15/99 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET JUN 99 PROF. LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5247
156.00
156.00
56807 07/15/99 000266 RIGHTWAY JUL TOILET RENTAL:RIVERTON PRK 190-180-999-5238
56807 07/15/99 000266 RIGHTWAY MISC. EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES:7/3-5 190-180-999-5238
56807 07/15/99 000266 RIGHTWAY PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL:7/3-5 190-180-999-5238
56807 07/15/99 000266 RIGHTWAY ADD'L PORTABLE TOILETS:7/3-5 190-180-999-5238
56808 07/15/99 003710 RIVERA, FRED ENTERTAINMENT:CONCERT SERIES 190-183-999-5370
62.89
700.00
1,102.08
423.88
700.00
2,288.85
700.00
56809 07/15/99 003743 ROBERT BYRD CONSTRUCTIO DEPOSIT:CASHIER OFFICE REMODEL 001-140-999-5601
56810 07/15/99 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. RB:LEAGUE-POLICY COMM.:6/23-24 001-100-999-5258
3,480.00
20.00
3,480.00
20.00
56811 07/15/99 001048 ROSAS CANTINA RESTAURAN REFRESHMENTS:7/4/99 PARADE VIP 190-183-999-5370
400.00
400.00
56812 07/15/99 003576 S Y S TECHNOLOGY INC 1 COMPUTER MONITOR 320-1970
56812 07/15/99 003576 S Y S TECHNOLOGY INC SALES TAX 320-1970
56813 07/15/99 SCHEIDT, CATHIE REFUND: MUSIC-MUSIC/TODDLERS 190-183-4982
2,142.00
166.01
30.00
2,308.01
30.00
56814 07/15/99 SCHLANSKY, JEFF REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 190-183-4984
56815 07/15/99 SJURSEN, CONNIE REFUND: COOKING W/TIA 190-183-4982
56816 07/15/99 SLATLEM, JOANMARIE REFUND: SWIM LESSONS - LEVEL 2 190-183-4975
56817 07/15/99 SMITH, ALAN REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 190-183-4984
182.00
15.00
43.00
125.00
182.00
15.00
43.00
125.00
56818 07/15/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUL:2-17-214-O428:MEADOWS PKWY 191-180-999-5319
56818 07/15/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-O6-105-O654:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319
56818 07/15/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUL:2-10-331-1353:STN #84 001-171-999-5240
56818 07/15/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-10-331-2153:TCC 190-184-999-5240
172.77
1,685.49
1,065.93
780.14
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56818
56818
56818
56818
56818
56818
56818
56819
56820
56821
56822
56822
56823
56824
56824
56825
56825
56826
56827
56827
56828
56828
56828
56828
56828
56828
56829
56830
56831
56832
56833
56833
56833
56833
56834
13:01
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN CHU
000305 TARGET STORE
003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC
003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC
000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
THOMPSON, DENISE
000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC
000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC
000459
000459
000459
000459
000459
000459
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G
TUHBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G
003722 UNITROL CORPORATION
VANGEISON, VICKIE
003089 WAKEFIELD COMPANY, THE
WALLBANK, PATRICIA
001342
001342
001342
001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JUL:2-O2-351-5281:CRC
JUL:2-15-671-5518:PALA RD TC1
JUL:2-18-348-6315:MARG. RD TC1
JUL:2-O1-202-7330:VARIOUS MTRS
JUL:2-O1-202-7603:ARTERIAL STL
JUL:2~10-901-7962:YUKON 1C1
JUN:2-18-589-9739:MARG. RD LS3
PEST CONTROL SVCS:WINCH.CRK PK
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES
2 OFFICEJET PRINTERS
SALES TAX
SUNSHINE FUND
PLAQUES FOR 4TH OF JUlY PARADE
RIBBONS FOR 4TH OF JULY PARADE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFUND: PAINTED EARTH
RECREATION SUPPLIES:CRC
SPORTS EQUIPMENT:CRC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ADD'L MOTORCYCLE PARTS:TEM PD
REFUND: LEVEL 1-SWIM LESSONS
6 DRINKING FOUNTAIN CARTRIDGES
REFUND: ARTS/CRAFTS-CARTOONING
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:SR.CENTER
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CRC
JUN JUDICIAL UPDATES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191~180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5212
190-2900
190-183-999-5370
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
001-2170
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-4982
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-170-999-5610
190-183-4975
190-180-999-5212
190-183-4982
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-120-999-5228
ITEM
AMOUNT
6,665.37
126.30
91.23
25,791.27
9,225.15
136.39
52.60
39.00
100.00
47.74
1,698.00
131.60
49.03
373.77
249.94
80.OO
40.00
90.00
84.35
44.48
160.00
294.40
220.80
73.60
160.00
80.OO
662.24
25.00
170.00
38.00
302.74
599.35
91.57
43.80
98.32
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
45,792.64
39.00
100.00
47.74
1,829.60
49.03
623.71
120.00
90.00
128.83
988.80
662.24
25.00
170.00
38.00
1,037.46
98.32
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56835
56836
56837
56837
13:01
CHECK
DATE
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002109
000345
000345
VENDOR
NAME
WHITE CAP
WIECHEC, MATT
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC. SUPPLIES - PUBLIC WORKS
RB:PLAYGROUND SFTY INSP.:6/7-8
APR-JUN BASE CHRG:5012 COPIER
JUN COPIER USAGE:5765
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5218
190-1990
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5239
ITEM
AMOUNT
93.61
252.26
62.50
469.96
PAGE 10
CHECK
AMOUNT
93.61
252.26
532.46
TOTAL CHECKS 254,753.98
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
13:37
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
661,613.19
442.01
46,907.43
1,250.00
22,188.00
765,133.08
442.01
6,272.67
541.00
TOTAL 1,504,789.39
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
13:37
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56840
56841
56842
56843
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56844
56845
56845
56845
56845
56845
56845
56846
56846
56847
56848
56848
56848
56849
56850
56850
56850
56850
56851
CHECK
DATE
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003630
003071
003629
003681
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
003592
003592
003676
003631
003631
003631
003286
000437
000437
000437
000437
002993
VENDOR
NAME
AGUILAR, GREG VILLANUEV
BIDAMERICA
CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
DAVIDSON & ALLEN, ARCHI
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION-ES
KLEINFELDER INC
KLEINFELDER INC
KLEINFELDER INC
LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QU
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JUN PROF SVCS:CIP PROJECTS
ARCHIVING SVCS: PLANNING DEPT
JUN SVCS:BRIDGE INSPECTIONS
JUN PRGSS:MNTC FAC PHASE Ill
JUN LDSCP SVCS: NORTH SLOPES
JUN LDSCP SVCS: WINCH CRK PRK
JUN LDSCP SVCS: VARIOUS PRKS
JUN LDSCP SVCS:STREETSCAPE
JUN LDSCP SVCS: OLD TWN
JUN LDSCP SVCS: SOUTH SLOPES
JUN LDSCP SVCS: MEDIAN
JUN LDSCP SVCS:MARG RD MEDIAN
JUN LDSCP SVCS: VARIOUS PRKS
JUN LDSCP SVCS: MARG COMM PRK
JUN LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER
JUN LDSCP SVCS: CRC
JUN LDSCP SVCS: TCC
JUN LDSCP SVCS: CITY HALL
JUN LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN PRKLOT
JUN LDSCP SVCS: STATION 84
OFFICE SUPPLIES - CRC
OFFICE FURNISHINGS FOR MUSEUM
SALES TAX
OFFICE SUPPLIES - TCSD
OFFICE SUPPLIES - RDA-LOW/MOD
OFFICE SUPPLIES - RDA-LOW/MOD
JUN PRGSS: PALA RD BRIDGE
JUN PRGSS:RETENTION PALA BRDGE
RELEASE RETENTION TO ESCROW
GEOTECHNICAL SVCS:OVRLD DR
MAY SVCS:OVRLD INSPECTIONS
GEOTECHNICAL SVC:PALA RD BRDGE
JUN SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT
JUN:TEMP HELP: TSAI
1998/99 ANNUAL AUDIT - CITY
1998/99 ANNUAL AUDIT - RDA
1998/99 ANNUAL AUDIT - RDA
JUN DESIGN SVCS:S/B RAMP-WINCH
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-165-999-5248
001-161-999-5248
210-165-604-5801
210-190-158-5802
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-199-999-5415
001-164-603-5415
193-180-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
190-184-999-5415
340-199-701-5415
001-164-603-5415
001-171-999-5215
190-182-999-5220
190-185-999-5610
190-185-999-5610
190-1990
280-199-999-5220
165-199-999-5220
210-165-631-5804
210-2035
210-1035
210-165-604-5801
210-165-604-5801
210-165-631-5801
001-101-999-5285
001-140-999-5118
001-140-999-5248
165-199-999-5248
280-199-999-5248
210-165-697-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
10,000.00
18,902.80
11,513.25
14,890.00
8,813.00
1,568.00
7,806.00
106.00
1,480.50
13,375.00
1,150.00
100.00
18,578.00
3,147.00
361.00
1,444.00
193.00
541.00
250.00
400.00
476.94
4,293.99
332.78
600.72
42.01
42.01
522,822.25
52,282.22-
52,282.23
6,400.00
6,048.00
9,311.00
9,731.59
3,180,00
1,636.07
400.00
400.00
30,043.28
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,000.00
18,902.80
11,513.25
14,890.00
59,312.50
5,788.45
470,540.03
52,282.23
21,759.00
9,731.59
5,616.07
30,043.28
56852 07/27/99 003218 PELA MAY-JUN PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-161-999-5250 5,225.00
VOUCHRE2
07/15/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56852
56853
56853
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56854
56855
56856
56856
56857
56858
56858
56858
13:37
CHECK
DATE
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
07/27/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003218
000267
000267
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000271
003576
003576
000919
003149
003149
003149
VENDOR
NAME
PELA
RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPAR
RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPAR
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
ROBERT BEIN I,~ FROST &
S Y S TECHNOLOGY INC
S Y S TECHNOLOGY INC
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION
TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION
TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JUN PLAN CHECK SERVICES
JAN-MAR 99 FIRE SERVICES
JAN-MAR 99 FIRE SERVICES
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LAW ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LA~ ENFORCMNT
FY98-99 RATE ADJ-LA~ ENFORCMNT
MAY BOOKING FEES
MAY ENG. SVCS:GERTRUDIS TRAIL
3 COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS
SALES TAX
JOINT USE AGREEMENT:T.M.S.
RET.W/H PMT#7:DUCK POND:97-17
MAY PRGS PMT#7:DUCK POND:97-17
MAY C/O PMT#7:DUCK POND:97-17
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5250
001-171-999-5251
001-2030
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5289
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5281
001-1990
001-170-999-5279
001-170-999-5297
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5273
210-190-147-5802
320-1970
320-1970
190-180-999-5415
210-2035
210-190-143-5804
210-190-143-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
5,480.00
292,552.59
260,011.03
20,739.60
4,094.08
3,910.40
1,030.40
928.00
1,319.37
501.52
7,174.37
1,567.36
1,366.20
134.89-
10,267.20
6,105.00
5,821.50
451.17
8,000.00
17,555.59-
149,994.39
25,561.49
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,705.00
552,563.62
52,763.61
6,105.00
6,272.67
8,000.00
158,000.29
TOTAL CHECKS 1,504w789.39
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE~/
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FRO M:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Pete Labahn, Police Chief
Genie Robeds, Director of Finance//~
July 27, 1999
Amendment No. 4 to the Police Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize modification to the City's current law
enforcement contract with Riverside County to add one traffic officer and one special team officer,
to increase patrol hours by the equivalent of two full time patrol officers, and to authorize the Mayor
to execute the contract in substantially the form attached.
BACKGROUND: Temecula Police Department staffing levels are driven by a target ratio of one
sworn officer for every thousand residents. In an effod to maintain this ratio additional staffing of four
positions were approved in the FY 1999-00 operating budget.
The following contract modifications are requested in order to meet the needs of our growing city and
to ensure sufficient staffing resources to provide appropriate response times to calls for service.
Special Enforcement Team (SET) Officer - 1
When the Police Department's previous SET was "folded" into our second Problem Oriented Policing
Team (POP) in 1997, that team handled street level narcotics enforcement. With increasing
demands placed upon POP, the need for a dedicated two-officer team to handle street level and
neighborhood narcotics investigations has become apparent. By adding one officer and combining
it with the position previously authorized for the regional taskforce, a special enforcement team has
been created which will work closely with patrol officers, investigators, POP officers and the Muraleta
Police Department to address narcotics related problems in Temecula's residential neighborhoods
and business establishments.
Traffic Officer- 1
Four specially trained police officers are assigned to traffic enforcement utilizing City owned
motorcycles. These officers are augmented by one community service officer dedicated to parking
R:INORTONL IAGENDASISHERIFFSCONTAGN. DOC 7/20/99
enforcement and traffic collision investigation. These five officers comprise the Traffic Enforcement
Team, which, in addition to enforcement and patrol, performs traffic accident investigation and
reconstruction. The Traffic Team also participates in school and community group training and
demonstrations focused on traffic and bicycle safety throughout the City of Temecula.
The addition of one swom police officer to dedicated traffic duties will increase the unit's ability to
deal with the traffic-related challenges faced by our city.
Patrol Officers-2
Temecula currently receives patrol services averaging ninety-eight hours per day, which is the
equivalent of approximately twenty full time police officers. The addition of patrol hours equivalent
to twenty two officers would bdng the average daily patrol hours to 107, which would assist in
keeping average response times within acceptable ranges.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the proposed contract modifications have been appropriated in
the FY 1999-00 operating budget.
Attachments: Amendment No. 4 to the Police Services Contract
R:INORTONL IAGENDAStSHERIFFSCONTAGN. DOC 7/20/99
DRAFT - - JULY 27, 1999
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
IT IS MUTALLY AGREED that the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between
the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside, effective July 1, 1995 through June 30, 2000,
as amended January 21, 1997, November 18, 1997 and February 11, 1998, is hereby amended
in the following respects only:
1. Attachment A is amended to read as follows:
LEVEL OF SERVICE
CITY OF TEMECULA
Average Patrol and Traffic Services
107 supported hours per day. (Approximate equivalent of 22 Deputy Sheriff
positions at 1,780 annual productives hours standard.)
Dedicated Positions
Two (2) Sheriffs Sergeant positions - Community Service Officers and Special
Teams
Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions - Special Enforcement Team
Four (4) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions - Community Policing Teams
Five (5) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions - Traffic Team
One (1) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) position - K-9 Handler
Four (4) Deputy Sheriff (unsupported) positions - School Resource Officers (year-
round)
Ten (10) Sheriffs Service Officer positions
One (1) Office Assistant III position
R:INORTONL IAGENDASISHERIFFSCONTAGN. DOC 7/22/99
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Temecula, by resolution or minute order duly
adopted by its City Council, has caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested and
sealed by its Clerk, and the County of Riverside, by order of its Board of Supervisors has caused this
Agreement to be signed by the Chairman of said Board and attested and sealed by the Clerk of said
Board, all on the dates indicated below.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Date: By:
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
By:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
By:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Date: By:
ATTEST:
Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy
R:INORTONLLIGREMNTSXPOLICE 41lt AGRM'I~.DOC 2
ITEM 4
DIR. OF FINANC~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
July 27, 1999
Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 88-12
(Ynez Corridor)
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director'//~J
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt Resolution 99- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR)
DISCUSSION: The County of Riverside (the "County") established Community Facilities
District No. 88-12 (the "District") in 1989 to finance the acquisition of a park site and
improvements to Ynez Road, the Overland Drive overcrossing and other related public
improvements. In 1992, the County issued special tax bonds for the District in the principal
amount of 818,325,000 (the "Bonds") to finance a portion of the improvements. Effective
December 1, 1997, responsibility for the District was transferred from the County to the City.
On May 12, 1998 the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the issuance of special tax
refunding bonds. On June 25, 1998 special tax refunding bonds in the amount of
818,690,000 were issued. This refunding will result in savings in debt service costs of
approximately 82.3 million over the next twenty years. The refunding bonds are special, limited
obligations payable solely from special taxes levied on property in the District and moneys held
under the refunding bond documents. The refunding bonds are in no way general obligations
of the City.
Each fiscal year a special tax is required to be levied in an amount to meet the total amount of
principal and interest payable on the bonds, the estimated amount to be incurred for
administrative expenses, and the amount necessary to replenish any reserve funds. This
amount will be calculated and divided by the total number of acres of taxable property in the
District. The resulting amount per acre will be multiplied by the number of acres in each parcel
to produce the amount of the special tax for such parcel for the fiscal year. The calculated
special tax required to be levied for the 1999-00 fiscal year is 91,657,133.91.
FISCAL IMPACT: The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1999-00 fiscal year
is 91,657,133.91. This amount represents a 960,309.97 or 3.78% increase from the 1998-99
special tax levy.
Attachments:
-Special Tax Calculation Worksheet
-Resolution No. 99-
2
1999-00 Budget
City Of. Temecula
CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)
Special Tax Calculation Worksheet
Bonds Outstanding
Delinquency Rate for Fiscal Year 1998-99
17,845,000.00
9.47%
March '00 Interest
September '00 Interest
September '00 Principal
Total Debt Service
Reserve Fund Requirement
Current Reserve Fund Balance
Surplus/(Deficit)
Reserve Adjustment
Total Obligation
1,531,468.75
1,531,473.63
4.88
459,193.75
459,193.75
610,000.00
1,528,387.50
1,528,387.50
Fiscal Agent (Series 1992) thru 9/2001
Fiscal Agent (Series 1998) thru 9/2001
Tax Consultant (VVebb)
Auditor -Controller
Legal (Foreclosure/Other)
Sales Tax Reimbursement Admin
O/S Printing
City Administration
Total Administration
Prior Year
Actual
4,937.50
6,000.00
6,000.00
138.00
4,942.65
2,500.00
16,941.48
7,500.00
41,459.63
A~usted
Amoun~
5,000.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
100.00
10,000.00
2,500.00
17,000.00
Current Year
Levy
5,000.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
100.00
10,000.00
2,500.00
16,900.00
46,500.00
Total Obligation
Total Administration
Prior Year (Surplus)/Deficit
Total Requirement
Administration % of Levy
rqaximum Authorized Tax
City's % of Levy
Total:Levy ~: :
FY 1998-99 Levy
Difference
1,528,387.50
46,500.00
82,246.41
1,657,133.91
7,962,846.38
~i1~657,133:.91~I
1,596,823.94
60,309.97
2.81%
1.02%
3.78%
7/20/99
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Temecula is the legislative body for Community
Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor), created pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside has enacted Ordinance No. 690
in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax
assessment on the property located within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax
assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, acting
as the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) as follows:
Section 1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct.
Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. 98-41 and County of Riverside
Ordinance No. 690, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $1,657, 133.91 on the parcels
which comprise the CFD for Fiscal Year 1999-00 as set forth on a magnetic tape to be provided by
Albert A. Webb Associates to the Auditor-Controller of the County.
Section 3. The special tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously
authorized by County of Riverside Ordinance No. 690, and is not in excess of that previously
approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 4. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part,
the costs of the following items:
Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded
indebtedness.
Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds,
if necessary.
Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as
provided in Resolution No. 98-41 and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any
other purpose.
Section 5. The Auditor-Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment
of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this
resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)"
on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 6. The County Auditor-Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection pedod,
promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments,
penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any
expenses to be paid to the Auditor-Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be
in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section
29304 of the Government Code.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of July, 1999, by the following
vote of the City Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services
July 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations
PREPARED BY: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for Pentlure based computer workstations Tech
101-Arcus, Inc., 16812 Millikan Ave, Irvine, California in the amount of ~2,365.11 per unit,
for a total purchase amount of 9243,606.59.
BACKGROUND: The City recently completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose
to select a qualified vendor to purchase one hundred and three (103) Pentlure based
computer workstations. These workstations will be replacing older systems that no longer
meet the technical requirements (i.e., Y2K compliant, insufficient memory, insufficient
storage, etc) of the operating systems in place at City Hall, and were budgeted for in the
current 99/00 fiscal budget. A total of twenty-four proposals were received and reviewed.
The proposals ranged from a low of ~2,274.39 from Custom Built Solutions of Walnut,
California to a high of 92,960.82 submitted by the California State Computer Store, Los
Angeles, California. Sixty-five RFP packets were mailed (fourteen to local Temecula
vendors), of which the following twenty-four vendors responded:
Vendor
Custom Built Solutions, Walnut CA
Tech 101-Arcus, Inc., Irvine CA
Resellers Corp of America, Lomita CA
Altima Solutions, Temecula CA
Computerland, Redlands CA
Unit Price
92,274.39
$2,365.11
92,375.89
92,406.87
92,415.32
Total Quote
$234,262.00
9243,606.59
9244,716.41
$247,907.16
~248,778.37
Jaguar Computer, Riverside CA
Golden State Trading Co., Brea CA
Sys Technology, Inc., Cypress CA
OmniData, Riverside CA
Concorde Computer Sys, Inc., San Dimes CA
Millennium III Systems, Inc., Temecula CA
DTK Computer Inc., City of Industry CA
Optimal Integrated Solutions, Carlsbad CA
CompUSA, San Bernardino CA
Camco Industries, Temecula CA
New Technologies, Santa Fe Springs CA
Tangent, Burlingame CA
Universe Systems, San Diego CA
I KON Technology Services, Redlands CA
Technology Integrated Group, San Diego CA
GTC Systems Inc., San Diego CA
LPS Computer Service Group, Inc., Escondido CA
Spectrum Technology Systems, Temecula CA
California State Computer Store, Los Angeles CA
$2,440.72
~2,461.01
~2,462.97
~2,484.72
$2,507.95
~2,525.29
~2,525.31
~2,528.89
~2,562.60
$2,565.42
92,574.91
~2,605.40
~2,620.48
$2,622.74
92,765.94
~2,781.34
92,847.67
$2,959.25
~2,960.82
~251,394.25
~253,484.03
~253,685.91
~255,925.65
~258,318.59
9260,105.25
9260,106.98
~260,475.93
9263,947.54
9264,237.78
~265,215.85
~268,355.69
~269,909.44
~270,142.50
~284,892.07
9286,478.02
9293,310.10
$304,803.00
$304,964.56
Tech 101-Arcus, Inc., of Irvine submitted the lowest qualified quote, meeting all the
technical specifications of the RFP. Although Custom Built Solutions of Walnut, California
had a lower quote, it did not meet the technical requirements as outlined in the RFP (i.e.,
they substituted a third party Motherboard and specified a slower CDRom Drive).
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were appropriated in the 1999-00 Fiscal Year Budget
for Information Services Internal Service fund to accommodate this purchase.
ATTACHMENTS: Request for Price Proposal Sheet - Tech 101-Arcus, Inc.
Equipment Purchase Agreement
EOUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
This Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of July 27, 1999, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"),
a municipal corporation, and Tech 101-Arcus, Inc., 16812 Millikan Ave., Irvine, California ("Vendor"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of Equipment. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and
the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City, Personal Computer Workstations as more particularly
described in Exhibit A, Equipment Specifications, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full
(hereafter "Equipment").
2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is Two hundred
forty-three thousand, six hundred and six dollars and fifty-nine cents ($243,606.59)The Purchase Price is f'mal and shall
be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule.' net 30.
3. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and warranties
to City:
a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and
perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with
Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to
the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by
all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable
against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms.
b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment. All
of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire
absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims,
covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment are
in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions,
representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the
Equipment for use as Computer Workstations on the City's Wide Area Network consisting of both Microsoft NT and
Novell Servers and that the City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the
ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used.
c. Year 2000 Compliance. Vendor warrants that each hardware, software, and firmware product
delivered under this agreement shall be able to accurately process date/time data (including, but not limited to,
calculating, comparing, and sequencing) from, into, and between the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and the years
1999 and 2000 and leap year calculations to the extent that other information technology, used in combination with the
information technology being acquired, properly exchanges date/time data with it. The duration of this warranty and
the remedies available to the City for breach of this warranty shall be as defined in, and subject to, the terms and
limitations of the Vendor's standard commercial warranty or warranties contained in this contract, provided that
notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in such commercial warranty or warranties, the remedies available to the
City under this warranty shall include repair or replacement of any listed product whose non-compliance is discovered
and made known to the Vendor in writing within ninety (90) days after acceptance. Nothing in this warranty shall be
construed to limit any rights or remedies the City may otherwise have under this contract with respect to defects other
than Year 2000 performance.
d. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement
contain or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
4. Time of Delivery. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before August 16, 1999 with
delivery of ten to twelve systems per week.
5. Place of Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
6. Title and Risk of Loss. Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain
with the Vendor until after inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City.
7. Inspection and Accepfance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such
inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the
Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within
ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by
City as of the date of receipt.
8. Rejection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 7, City may, at its option,
(1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units
of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and
with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election
by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred
by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses.
9. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both
the Equipment tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the
original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to
Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent
efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor.
10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and
liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur
or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the
Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
11. Contract Documents.
a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein
and made a part hereof: (1) Request for Proposal dated June 30, 1999, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Vendor's
response to the Request for Proposal dated July 13, 1999, attached hereto as Exhibit B.
b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any
term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling.
c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the Vendor's response to
the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail
over the Vendor's Response to the RFP.
12. Remedies. The remedies and fights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative
with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity.
13. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of
the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement.
14. Legal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which
in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this
Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its
officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this
section.
15. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Vendor without the express written consent of City.
This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal
representatives, successors and assigns.
16. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final
jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid,
enforceable, and binding on the parties.
17. Entire Agreement; Modification; Waiver. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements,
representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment
of this Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver
of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of
any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be
binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver.
18. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing
and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is
to be given, or on the third business day after mailing if mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by first class
mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, or on the first business day after being deposited with an overnight carrier
for delivery the next business day, and properly addressed as follows:
To Vendor at: Tech 101- Arcus, Inc. To City at:
16812 Millikan Ave.
Irvine, CA 92606
City of Temecula
PO Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
Atm: City Manager
Any party may change its address for purposes of this paragraph by giving the other parties written notice of the new
address in the manner set forth above.
19. Effects of Headings. The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for
convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions.
20. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the
State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California.
////
/11/
3
IN WITNESS VVHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on the day and year fncst above
written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Approved As to Form:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc.
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
4
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula, California 92589-9033
(909) 694-6456
FAX (909) 694-6498
June 30,1999
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The City ofTemecula, hereinafter referred to as the City, is inviting proposals for one hundred and
three (103) Pentium based computers and miscellaneous supporting peripherals. The purpose of
this Request For Proposal (RFP) is for the City to select a qualified firm (hereinafter referred to
as "Vendor").
Time Schedules:
The following is the City's tentative schedule for the selection of a Vendor:
1. Request For Proposal Mailed:
2. Deadline for Filing RFP:
3. Staff Review of Proposals:
4. Award of Contract:
Wednesday, June 30, 1999
Tuesday, July 13, 1999
July 14 - 26, 1999
Tuesday, July 27, 1999
Prior to 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 13, 1999, an original and two (2) copies of the proposal
(Exhibit A) and all supporting documents shall be submitted in a sealed envelope to:
Via U.S. Mail or Courier Service:
Walk-in Deliverv:
City of Temecula
Attn: City Clerk
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA. 92589-9033
City of Temecula
Attn: City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA. 92590
Please clearly identify the package - PC Workstation RFP
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL -PC Workstation (continued)
Any questions pertaining to this Request For Quote may be directed to Tom Hafeli at
(909) 694-6456, Fax at (909) 694-6498 or email at: hafeli~citycouncil.org
Sincerely,
CITY OF TEMECULA
2
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula, California 92589-9033
(909) 694-6456
FAX (909) 694-6498
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
COMPUTERS
PART I: SELECTION CRITERIA
A final contract will be awarded to the proposal which best serves the needs of the City and provides
the highest quality and cost effectiveness as determined by the City Council based on the following
factors (which are listed without any implication of priority):
The extent to which the proposal meets the needs of the City for the equipment/services and
the specific requirements of this RFP;
2. The quality of the equipment/services proposed;
The overall cost to the City of the proposal, including, but not limited to, pricing of the
equipment/supplies, delivery schedule, terms of payment, warranties, maintenance
requirements, and required site preparation;
,
The experience and qualifications of Vendor to successfully provide the equipment in Exhibit
A;
5. Previous performance of Vendor in providing similar equipment/services;
6. Financial ability of Vendor to provide the equipment/services to the City; and
7. Vendor's conformity to the specification set forth in the RFP.
PART II: INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The Vendor shall provide all of the following specific information to the City as part of the
proposal, as well as all other information and documents as may be required by or necessary
to respond to other provisions of this RFP:
a,
List of equipment/services to be provided, including a breakdown of costs for all
equipment components. (See Exhibit "A").
Provide pricing on all requirements as outlined in Exhibit "A". If there are
discrepancies between unit prices and extensions, the City reserves the fight to clarify
pricing with the affected vendors.
Delivery schedules shall be part of the consideration. Time of delivery must be stated
in definite terms, and must be met. If time varies on specific items proposed, the
Vendor shall so state the specific schedule to those items in the proposal sheet
(Exhibit "A"). Once a Vendor has been selected for award, the City reserves the
right to renegotiate delivery terms based on changing situations or the convenience
of the City.
d. Vendor shall provide an original and two (2) copies of proposals upon submission.
eo
This RFP outlines the requirements herein in as much detail as is currently 'known.
Please provide any exceptions, additional information, or suggestions that will aid
in the City's selection process (attachments are acceptable).
Information regarding the Vendor's experience and qualifications to successfully
provide the equipment/services outlined in Exhibit "A".
Certification establishing that the vendor is fully authorized by the manufacturer for
the sale, distribution, installation, and/or support of the equipment required by this
RFP.
h,
A listing of client references and an outline of any experience the firm/vendor has had
in meeting the needs of other governmental organizations, or any organization that
has purchased similar equipment, supplies or services.
Vendor agrees that failure on its part to list all cost components related to the purchase (i.e.,
sales tax and freight charges) will not be accepted by the City as grounds to re-quote the
proposal. The quote shall include all cost components related to the purchase. Vendor
acknowledges that the original proposal and costs provided stand. However, Vendor has the
option of withdrawing a proposal at any time until a final contract is executed.
Vendor's proposal shall include the price for the most up to date, high quality, and state of
the art equipment, as outlined in the Equipment Specifications within this RFP (Exhibit
"A' ').
The City reserves the right to negotiate terms and scope of work with the highest ranked fn'm.
If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the City reserves the right to negotiate with any other
~nalist.
10.
11.
PART
1.
All of the equipment described in the Exhibit "A" must carry a three year parts and labor on-
site warranty and technical support. Vendor shall also fully describe the terms of all
equipment warranties received from the manufacturer.
The City reserves the fight to select a Vendor to perform all of the work identified in this
RFP, or only selected portions based on price and/or other factors.
The Vendor shall be excused from performance hereunder during the time and to the extent
that Vendor is prevented from obtaining, delivering, or performing in the customary manner,
by acts of God, fire, war, strike, and loss or shortage of transportation facilities or similar
conditions beyond the reasonable control of Vendor. Vendor shall notify the City within five
(5) working days of any such condition that work will be delayed and shall provide the City
with satisfactory evidence that non-performance is due to other than fault or negligence on
Vendor's part.
Any evidence of agreement or collusion among vendors acting to illegally restrain freedom
of competition by agreement to propose a fixed price, or otherwise, will render the proposal
of such vendors void.
Vendor shall be responsible for paying its employees and any sub-vendors the prime vendor
hires. Vendor is required to comply with all existing State and Federal labor laws. If
Vendor hires a sub-vendor, it will be the prime Vendor's responsibility to ensure that all sub-
vendors meet the requirements as stated in this RFP.
Vendor, and any sub-vendor who is hired by the prime vendor, agrees to maintain a City of
Temecula Business License for the duration of the contract.
The standard form of the City's Equipment Purchase/Agreement is attached hereto as
Exhibit B. The Vendor selected will be required to enter into this Agreement. By submitting
the Proposal, Vendor certifies to City that it has reviewed the agreement and has incorporated
the cost of complying with the Agreement into its Proposal.
III: GENERAL PROVISIONS
Vendor is required to carefully and fully investigate all of the requirements of this RFP as
well as the site where the work will take place and all work or arrangements needed to fulfill
the terms of the Proposal. By submitting a Proposal, Vendor represents and certifies to the
City that such investigation has been completed and that it fully understands the scope of
work required.
The Equipment Specifications/Proposal sheet (Exhibit "A") shall be signed by an authorized
official of the company.
3. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive irregularities in the
proposals.
,
The City will not reimburse vendors for any costs involved in the preparation and submission
of proposals. Furthermore, this RFP does not obligate the City to accept or contract for any
expressed or implied services.
,
The City reserves the fight to request any organization submitting a proposal to clarify its
proposal or to supply additional material deemed necessary to assist in the selection process.
If an Exhibit "A" requirement cannot be met by a vendor, then the vendor should submit a
"No Proposal" response for the items affected. Alternate or equivalent items submitted for
no proposal responses may be considered by the City, unless otherwise specified.
All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become
public records upon their opening by the City Clerk's Office or City Staff.
,
Vendor is requested to provide any exceptions, additional information or suggestions that
will aid in the City's selection process.
,
Vendor and any iub-vendor are also obligated to comply with all existing local, State and
Federal Labor laws, rules, and regulations, including, without limitation, OSHA standards
and requirements.
10.
Any questions regarding this Request For Proposal should be referred, in writing, to Mr.
Tom Hafeli. Questions may be transmitted by fax to (909) 694-6498, emailed at:
hafeli~citycouncil.org or may be delivered to City Hall at the address below:
Via U.S. Mail:
Courier Service/Walk-In Delivery:
· City of Temecula
Attn: Tom Hafeli
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 9258%9033
City of Temecula
Attn: Thomas Hafeli
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
All questions and the City's answers will become public record and will be shared with all vendors
who have requested a copy of this RFP.
The attached Exhibit "A "is a suggested list only. If vendor needs to revise or make additions to
Exhibit "A, " computer or typed alterations are allowed as long as the City format is maintained.
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR PRICE
PROPOSAL SHEET
PART I: EQUIP~!ENT SPECIFICATIONS
~t,x' Description
Io3 - Personal Computer Workstation, ATX Mid-Tower 8Bay Case
tMust comply with Part 15 of FCC Rules)
lntcl SE44()BX-2 Motherboard w. integrated audio
Intcl 5{n) N1H/Pentium Ill Processor
I2.";XIB I(.~M/I,' SDRAXI Dimms
5.4 GB EIDE Hard Drive
3:: Tcac Floppy Drive
4oX Toshiba CD-RON! ATAPI Dnvc
Iomcga Zip Internal ATAPI Dnxc
.VH XPF. RT 9,1 AGP 2X Video .-x. dapter x~ SNIB RAM
3t om Fa.,,I EtherLink 3C9t)STX NM NIC
103 - Microsoff Natural Keyboard Elite
103 - .Xlicrusot~ IntelliMouse Pro
103 - Viev~sonic VPA 150 ViewPanel
'Fhree year on-site pans and labor warranty on all Hardware
Unit Price
Extended
///5.
Note: No operating system required. Systents will be inmged by the City with Windows 95/98 under an
existing site license.
PART 11: PRICING
Equipment per specifications/PA. RT 11
Deliver}.' Charges
Sales Tax { Temecula 7.75°/, }
Other Costs I Please identify}
ITE~I
TOTAL
f12 6,095',
i 75.2 I,
.
TOTAL PRICE
\.'endor Nan'ae:.7'~Gb//0/* ,'~E6tZ<~,/Me- Contact: f-f,F/Fff 27C,q'/,)~
..x. tdrcs~:_jG~/2./'~U/L4-,~ Ai,~,, ........... CiW. StZip: j,CVt>,/C:' C74
By signing this ~P. Vendor has read and will comply wi~ all tern and conditions herein.
Signature: L
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Acting City Manager/City Council
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official
July 27, 1999
Agreement between City of Temecula and BidAmerica
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve an Agreement for the scanning of building permits for the Building and Safety Department
in its proposal for an amount not to exceed Thirty seven thousand seven hundred sixty dollars and
forty five cents ($37,760.45).
BACKGROUND: The Building and Safety Department is required by State Health and Safety Code
to maintain copies of building permits for the life of the buildings. The scanning of the permits onto
compact disc medium will satisfy this requirement and save considerable file storage space. This
system is also compatible with the Sierra System.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are currently available in Account No. 001-162-999-5250 "Other Outside
Services".
ATTACHMENT: Agreement
R:\BROCKMEI\ACENDA\BIDAMERICA99.DOC 1 7/19/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27, 1999, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and BidAmerica, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the
mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount shall not exceed Thirty seven thousand seven hundred sixty dollars and forty
five cents ($37,760.45) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved
as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City
Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
R:\brockmeiXagmts\bidamerica99
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, roused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon roasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidamefica99
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to pe~orm under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001 ).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidamerica99
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in
any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power
to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
R:\brockmeiXagmts\bidamerica99
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Clerk
To Consultant:
BidAmerica
41085 Elm St.
Murrieta, CA 92562
Attention: Steven G. Doulames, P.E.
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidame~ca99
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only n/a shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City
fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of n/a from Consultant's employ. Should he
or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this
Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this
Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services pe~ormed up to,
and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City
Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written,
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidamerica99
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
BidAmerica
By
Steven Doulames, P. E.
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidamerica99
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
BidAmerica will remove specified permit files and convert to 300 dpi Group 4 multi-page TIFF image
format. Permit file plans will not exceed 36" wide.
Price will also include pick-up and delivery of the original documents.
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidame~ca99
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
(Attached)
R:\brockmei\agmts\bidamerica99
DATE: 7/1/99
RE:
EXHIBIT "B"
Scol0e of Service
City of Temecula
Electronic Archivin,q I Plan Sheets and Documents
I Buildin_cl and Safety Permit Files
Item
101
102
103
Estimated Unit
Description Quantity Cost Unit
Permit Files Plan Conversion: 4,055 $1.49 per image
Total $6,041,95
Paper plans from permit files to be converted to 300 dpi Group 4 multi-page TIFF image format. Plan
sheets are of paper, mylar or vellum medium and not to exceed 36" wide. Unit costs are included for
item 103 below.
Permit Files Document Conversion: I 126,874 I $0.2T5 per image
otal $31,718.50
Documents are to be converted to 300 dpi Group 4 multi-page TIFF image format. Documents
shall be of legal size or smaller. Double sided documents count as two images. Unit costs are
included for item 103 below.
Indexing and LaserFiche Scanning ~ * ~ * Total *
,
Above items to be scanned using LaserFiche Data Management System. To be indexed by
street address and file number. Both of which are labeled on the permit folder.
104 Pick-up and Delivery of Original Documents: I I I $0.00 per tdp
No Additional Charge $0.00
105 Duplicate of CD set with scanned images. I 1 I $35.00 per cd
Grand Total (Items 10t through 104):I $37,760.45
Pdces do not include sales tax or shipping charges where applicable.
BidAmerica
Simplified Atch~hg Soltrdens and More
ITEM 7
APPROVAL L~,~
CITY ATTORNEY"~ I~, ,
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official '~----
July 27, 1999
Contract Plan Checking Services - JAS Pacific, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
1. An Agreement for plan check services with J. A. S. Pacific, Inc. and the Building and Safety
Department in the amount of $25,000.
2. A ten percent (10%), or $2,500, contingency for plan check services.
DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Department has experienced an increase in the volume
of plan checks. With the addition of the mall project it has burdened our current plan checking
services. J.A. S. Pacific, Inc. will provide additional services for the City of Temecula, on an as
needed basis. J.A. S. Pacific, Inc. has been utilized for plan review during Fiscal Year 1998-1999.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Account Number 001-162-999-5248
"Consulting Services".
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27, 1999, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and J.A.S. Pacific, Inc., ("Consultant"). In consideration
of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly for actual services performed.
Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City
Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-1-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSUAS.PLC 7/20/99 cb
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
-2-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSUAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001 ).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
-3-
R:XBROCKME1XAGMTSUAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in
any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power
to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
-4-
R:NBROCKME1XAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
JAS Pacific, Inc.
320 S. Milliken Ste C
Ontario, CA 91761
Attention: J. Addison Smith
-5-
R:~BROCKMElXAGMTSUAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Contractor shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Contractor may use
assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of said assistants from
Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option
to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual
services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to
in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Attest:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
-6-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSUAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
JAS Pacific, Inc.
By
-7-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
EXHIBITA
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
JAS proposes to provide the following the following building plan check services:
To provide initial plan check of submitted plans to determine compliance with City
adopted model codes: Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code, Uniform Fire Code, California State
Building Code, Title 24 (Energy Conservation and Handicapped Access
Regulations), Sound Transmission Control, and locally adopted amendments
thereof.
To analyze structural engineering computations ensuring compliance with the
jurisdiction's adopted model codes and regulations.
3. To maintain a timely turnaround for all building plan check projects as follows:
Three to five (3-5) working days for single family residential projects.
Seven to ten (7-10) working days for more complex non-residential projects.
Ten (10) working days for more complex non-residential projects.
Three (3) working days for resubmitted residential projects.
Five (5) working days for resubmitted non-residential projects.
Other requested timetables available to fit individual circumstances.
Priority plan check availability to individual applicants on specified projects requiring
a more expeditious turnaround time than previously specified. Turnaround time
shall be within five (5) working days from date of receipt by JAS Pacific, Inc. The
plans shall be picked up and delivered by our in-house courier service at no cost to
the jurisdiction.
To provide fast track plan check availability to the City on City funded projects
requiring a more expeditious turnaround time than previously specified. Turnaround
time shall be within (5) working days from the date of receipt by JAS Pacific
Services. The plans shall be picked up and delivered by our in house courier
service at no cost to the jurisdiction.
To coordinate the review of plans with Fire, Sanitation, Health and other agencies
when applicable.
7. To systematically log all plans with a plan check tracking system.
To provide within 24 hours notice, pick up or delivery of plans utilizing our courier
service at no charge to the jurisdiction.
Plans examiners and engineers shall be readily available to the applicant and
maintain an open line of communication to ensure compliance with local regulations
and policy interpretations.
-8-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSNJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
10.
To provide the applicant and the city, a typed correction list to achieve compliance
of adopted codes and regulations.
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Residential and Commercial Plan Review
A fee of fifty two percent (52%) of Building Permit Fees based upon the 1991 Uniform
Building Code Table 3-A Calculations.
No other fee shall be charged for re-submittal of plans that required corrections or minor
revisions, prior to permit issuance. An additional fee shall be charged for major structural
revisions or change orders made after permit issuance. As a result, JAS shall notify the
City in writing of the necessity to charge an additional fee to offset cost of additional plan
review service.
Repetitive Plans. With the exception of each residential tract elevation or orientation, a fee
equal to fifteen (15%) of the regular City plan review fee shall be charged for each
repetitive plan. Each different plan and each different elevation shall be charged a normal
fee equal to fifteen (15%) percent of the regular City plan review fee.
-9-
R:XBROCKMEI\AGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 1, 1999, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and J.A.S. Pacific, Inc., ("Consultant"). In consideration
of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly for actual services performed.
Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City
Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-I-
R:\BROCKMEIM~GMTS~.IAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, roused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
-2-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001 ).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
-3-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSXJAS.PLC 718/99 cb
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in
any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power
to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
-4-
R:\BROCKMEIXAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
JAS Pacific, Inc.
320 S. Milliken Ste C
Ontario, CA 91761
Attention: J. Addison Smith
-5-
R:XBROCKME1XAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Contractor shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Contractor may use
assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of said assistants from
Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option
to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual
services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to
in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Attest:
Steven J o Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
-6~
R:XBROCKME1XAGMTSUAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
JAS Pacific, Inc.
By
-7-
R:~BROCKMEIXAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
JAS proposes to provide the following the following building plan check services:
To provide initial plan check of submitted plans to determine compliance with City
adopted model codes: Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code, Uniform Fire Code, California State
Building Code, Title 24 (Energy Conservation and Handicapped Access
Regulations), Sound Transmission Control, and locally adopted amendments
thereof.
To analyze structural engineering computations ensuring compliance with the
jurisdiction's adopted model codes and regulations.
3. To maintain a timely turnaround for all building plan check projects as follows:
Three to five (3-5) working days for single family residential projects.
Seven to ten (7-10) working days for more complex non-residential projects.
Ten (10) working days for more complex non-residential projects.
Three (3) working days for resubmitted residential projects.
Five (5) working days for resubmitted non-residential projects.
Other requested timetables available to fit individual circumstances.
Priority plan check availability to individual applicants on specified projects requiring
a more expeditious turnaround time than previously specified. Turnaround time
shall be within five (5) working days from date of receipt by JAS Pacific, Inc. The
plans shall be picked up and delivered by our in-house courier service at no cost to
the jurisdiction.
To provide fast track plan check availability to the City on City funded projects
requiring a more expeditious turnaround time than previously specified. Turnaround
time shall be within (5) working days from the date of receipt by JAS Pacific
Services. The plans shall be picked up and delivered by our in house courier
service at no cost to the jurisdiction.
To coordinate the review of plans with Fire, Sanitation, Health and other agencies
when applicable.
7. To systematically log all plans with a plan check tracking system.
To provide within 24 hours notice, pick up or delivery of plans utilizing our courier
service at no charge to the jurisdiction.
Plans examiners and engineers shall be readily available to the applicant and
maintain an open line of communication to ensure compliance with local regulations
and policy interpretations.
-8-
R:XBROCKME1XAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
10.
To provide the applicant and the city, a typed correction list to achieve compliance
of adopted codes and regulations.
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Residential and Commercial Plan Review
A fee of fifty two percent (52%) of Building Permit Fees based upon the 1991 Uniform
Building Code Table 3-A Calculations.
No other fee shall be charged for re-submittal of plans that required corrections or minor
revisions, prior to permit issuance. An additional fee shall be charged for major structural
revisions or change orders made after permit issuance. As a result, JAS shall notify the
City in writing of the necessity to charge an additional fee to offset cost of additional plan
review service.
Repetitive Plans. With the exception of each residential tract elevation or orientation, a fee
equal to fifteen (15%) of the regular City plan review fee shall be charged for each
repetitive plan. Each different plan and each different elevation shall be charged a normal
fee equal to fifteen (15%) percent of the regular City plan review fee.
-9-
R:XBROCKME1XAGMTSXJAS.PLC 7/8/99 cb
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official ~
July 27, 1999
Contract Inspection Services Agreement for JAS Pacific, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with JAS Pacific, Inc., in the amount of $60,320 to
continue providing building inspection services to the Building and Safety Department.
DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Department continues to experience increased volume of
inspection activity. Over the next twelve (12) months, inspection activity is anticipated to increase
substantially as the mall construction progresses. In an effort to continue to service this increased
volume of inspection requests, contract building inspection assistance is being used to supplement the
department's core inspection staff. The use of contract inspection services on an as needed basis,
gives the Chief Building Official the ability to manage increases in inspection workload in a timely
manner as they occur.
FISCAL IMPACT:
"Temporary Help".
Adequate funds are currently available in Account No. 001-162-999-5118,
ATTACHMENT: Agreement
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27, 1999, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and JAS Pacific, Inc., (AConsultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1999 and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30,
2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged
in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount shall not exceed sixty thousand three hundred and twenty dollars ($60,320.00) for the
total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City
Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-1-
RABROCKMEBAGMTSUAS 1 .WPD 7/2/99 cb
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work
under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a
portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OFCONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales,
costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance
of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided
in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily
accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at
reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books
and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection
of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records,
together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt
of final payment.
-2-
R:~BROCKMEIXAGMTSXJAS1.WPD 7/2/99 cb
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes,
and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to
this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise
disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files,
Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the
necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and
printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other
than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and
all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them
for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or
wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain
for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
Califomia and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
-3-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSUAS 1 .WPD 7/2/99 cb
(2)
Automobile Liability:
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability:
disease.
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
(5)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either
party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days'
prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has
been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
-4-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSUASI.WPD 7/2/99 cb
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall fumish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in
any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power
to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed
of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any smmnons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request,
court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder
or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the fight, but has no
obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, heating or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity
-5-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSXJASI .WPD 7/2/99 cb
to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to
review any such response does not imply or mean the fight by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set
forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
P. O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Califomia 92590
Attention: Acting City Manager
To Consultant:
JAS, Pacific, Inc.
320 S. Milliken, Ste. C
Ontario, CA 91761
Attn: Jason Smith
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only
JAS, Pacific, Inc. shall perform the services described in this Agreement. JAS, Pacific, Inc. may
use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Assistant from
Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to
immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon
termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services
performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing
between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govem the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect.
-6°
R:XBROCKMEBAGMTSXJAS1 .WPD 7/2/99 cb
Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and
upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has
the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Attest:
Steven J. Ford
Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
CONSULTANT
JAS PACIFIC, INC.
By
Jason Smith
-7-
R:XBROCKMEBAGMTSUASI .WPD 7/2/99 cb
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Perform combination building inspection on an as-needed basis.
-8-
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTSNJAS1 .WPD 7/2/99 cb
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
For and in consideration of the Contractors services, inspection services shall be provided at the rate
of $29.00 per hour, plus $.30 per mile for each mile accumulated while performing inspection
services for the City. Should the City provide vehicular transportation for Contractors use, no fees
shall be charged for mileage.
-9-
R:XBROCKMEI\AGMTSXJAS 1 .WPD 7/2/99 cb
ITEM 9
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. EImo, Chief Building Official//~
July 27, 1999
Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with
P & D Consultants, in an amount not to exceed sixty thousand dollars ($60,000), to provide
supplemental building inspection services to the Building and Safety Department.
DISCUSSION: Construction activity has continued to increase, with the construction of the mall
and anchor stores, along with the level of residential construction, it is necessary to supplement the
regular inspection staff, with contract building inspectors. P & D Consultants has provided resumes
of certified building inspectors that staff feels possess the experience and qualifications to assist the
regular inspection staff in maintaining the current level of service to the development community.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are currently available in Account No. 001-162-999-5118, "Temporary
Help", for this purpose. Expenditures from this account are offset by building permit revenue
collection. No further appropriation of funds will be necessary for this purpose.
R: \ BROCKMEI \AGENDA \ P&D CONSULTANTS99 . DOC ] 7/8/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27, 1999, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and P & D Consultants, ("Consultant"). In consideration
of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount shall not exceed Sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) for the total term of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City
Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-l-
r:XagmtsXmasters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
-2-
r:\agmtsXmasters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001 ).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
-3- r:\agrnts\masters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in
any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power
to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
-4- r:XagmtsXmasters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
P & D Consultants
999 Town & Country Road
4th Floor
Orange, CA 92868
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City.
-5- r:\agmtsXmasters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Attest:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
P & D Consultants
By
-6- r:XagmtsXtnasters\97master.agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
EXHIBITA
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Perform combination building inspection on an as-needed basis.
-7-
r:\agmtsXmasters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
For and in consideration of the Contractor's services, inspection services shall be provided at the
rate of $45.00 per hour, plus $.30 per mile for each mile accumulated while performing inspection
services for the City. Should the City provide vehicular transportation for Contractor's use, no fees
shall be charge for mileage.
-9-
r:\agmts\masters\97master. agr/ajp - revised 7/01/97
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official ~
July 27, 1999
Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for Plan Check Services with Esgil
Corporation.
2. Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for Plan Check Services with
VanDorpe Chou and Associates.
DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Department has experienced a continued increase in
plan review activity over the past several years. To be responsive to this increased plan review
workload, the services of Esgil Corporation and VanDorpe Chou and Associates has been utilized.
Due to the nature of the building industry, its activity fluctuations and the rapid growth the City is
experiencing, accurate estimation of fiscal year plan review activity is difficult. Over the past several
years, requests have been made to Council for additional appropriation of funds for plan review
services, beyond that approved in the department's operating budget
The current contracts with Esgil Corp and VanDorpe Chou and Associates, do not expire until the
year 2001.
This action approves the expenditures for these firms for this fiscal year. By having these firms
provide plan review services, the community receives more effective plan reviews resulting in
effective customer service.
FISCAL IMPACT:
"Consulting Services".
Adequate funds are available in Account Number 001-162-999-5248,
R: \BROCKMEI \AGENDA \ESGILVAN99. DOC | g/22/99
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREENIENT, is made and effective as of July 1, 1998, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Esgil Corporation, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the
mutual covenants and conditions set tbrth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1998, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 31, 2001, unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agrreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set Ibrth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks
according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ,
at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAY~IENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and
terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for
actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for
services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides othersvise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the
Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this/Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement,
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any ~vork performed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by ~vritten notice to the Consultant. If such
failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond
the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a
default.
R:IBROCICMEIL~.GMTS'~ESGIL.x, VPD 9/22/98 cb
-I-
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in
the per/brmance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement. it shall serve the Consultant with
xvritten notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days at~er service upon it of said notice in which
to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant tbAls to cure its
default xvithin such period of time, the City shall have the right, notxvithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement. to terminate this Agreement without/hrther notice and without prejudice to any other remedy
to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUNIENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs,
expenses, receipts and other such intbrmation required by City that relate to the pertbrmance of services
under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail
to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally
accepted accounting pnnciples and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall
provide tree access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and
records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make
transcripts therefi'om as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work. data. documents, proceedings and
activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained
tbr a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion otZ or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement.
all original documents. designs. drawings, maps. models. computer files. surveys. notes. and other documents
prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become
the sole property of the City and may be used. reused or othersvise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City,
upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of
accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that
specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor shall defend. indemnitS, and hold harmless
the City, and its agents and employees from and against any and all claims. damages, losses, and expenses,
including attorneys' fees. arising out of or resulting ti-om the Contractor's acts or omissions pursuant to this
contract. The City shall indemnity and hold harmless ESGIL and its agents and employees ti-om and against
all claims. damages, losses and expenses. including attorneys' t~es arising out of or resulting t~rom the City's
acts or omissions pursuant to this contract.
9. FREEDOM OF LIABILITY. The Contractor and Contractor staff, when
performing duties as representative of the City, shall have the freedom from liability contained in the
applicable section pertaining to the powers and duties of the building official, of the most recent adopted
edition of the California Building Code.
10. FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY. The City's Chief Building Official shall have
final decision authority over the results of the plan check by the Contractor and all work performed by the
Contractor shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official.
In instances where the permit applicant takes exception to the Contractor' s interpretation of the regulation
contained in Title 24, the Building Official shall render a final decision utilizing, as deemed appropriate, the
resources of the City Attorney and/or Board of Appeals.
11. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property xvhich may
arise t?om or in connection xvith the per/brmance of the work hereunder by the Consultant. its agents,
representatives, or employees.
-2-
R:/BROCKMEI\AGMTS\ESGIL.WPD 9/22/98 cb
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability. coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001 ).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code I (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $ 1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury., personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this projects'location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: S1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $I,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations. claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain. or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials. employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by
the City, its officers. officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of
the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers. officials, employees or volunteers.
-3-
R:',.BROCKMEI',AGMTS'/ESGIL.WPD 9/22/98 cb
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought. except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended. voided, canceled by either party., reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested. has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. unless othenvise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall fumish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on tbrms provided by
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an
alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete. certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel pertbrming the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all
times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees
or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent
that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City,
or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries. wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for
City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itselfinti>rmed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
pertbrmance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply
~vith all such taws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by ti~ilure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.
Consultant. its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from
the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of
support. testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work
performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to
a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such
court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers. employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request
tbr documents, interrogatories. request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena
from any parry regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project
R:"BROCKMEI'~AGMTS'ESGIL.WPD 9122/98 cb -4-
or property located within the City.. City. retains the right, but has no obligation. to represent Consultant
and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with
City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to
control. direct. or rewrite said response.
15. NOTICES. Any notices ~vhich either party may desire to give to the other party.
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to. Federal Express. that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail. postage prepaid.
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as
that party. may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula. California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Esgil Corporation
9320 Chesapeake Dr. #208
San Diego, CA 92123
Attention: Richard Esgate, President
16. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be the value of the City of the
services rendered.
17. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have
in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
18. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws
of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement
shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal dismet court with geographic jurisdiction over the City
of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party
as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged
into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation
of any and all facts such party deems material.
20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority
to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
R:'BROCKMEI"AGMTS"ESGIL. WPD 9~22.'98 cb -5-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the dav
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By ~~-, ~~~
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Attest:
I
Peter Thorson
City Attorney
Consu'ltant
R:xBROCKMEI'AGMTS',ESGIL.~.VPD 92298 cb -6-
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
PLAN CHECKING
Provide a complete plan check service to the City of Temecula including analysis for compliance with
the City's adopted uniform codes as follows:
Building code requirement including:
· Requirements based upon type of occupancy
· Requirements based upon type of construction
· Engineering regulations including seismic loads
· Detailed regulations of construction
Fire resistive standards for fire protection
· Fire and life safety requirements
· Accessibility to the physiclily handicapped
National Electrical Code requirements
Uniform Plumbing Code requirements
Title 24 energy conservation compliance
City's amendments to the uniform codes.
-7-
R:xBROCKMEI\AGMTS',ESGIL.WPD 9"22<98 cb
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
COMPLETE PLAN CHECK:
Esgil Corporation's fee shall be 52% of the Building Permit Fee calculated per Table 3-A of the 199 l
edition of the Uniform Administrative Code for each building plan checked. The construction
valuation shall be based on the most recent valuation multiplier published by the International
Conference of Building Officials in Building Standards or on the architects; estimated construction
cost, or on the Building Official's cost estimate, whichever is greater.
Not withstanding the above, the minimum contractor fee for plan checking a proposed project shall
be one hundred dollars ($100.00).
Plan check fee for repetitive identical buildings shall be 52% of the building permit fee as noted
above for the first, or basic building, and 15% of the building permit fee as noted above for each
additional building.
The single fee includes all rechecks and there are no additional charges for preliminary plan check
con/~rences at our office, expedited processing, checking plans that are eventually found to be
incomplete or for the pick-up and delivery of plans or for meetings with the Building Official at
his/her request.
PARTIAL PLAN CHECK:
Partial plan checks are discouraged due to the need to coordinate all disciplines in a plan review,
however, the fees for partial plan checks are:
1. Basic minimum for any plan check 50% of 1991 UBC plan check fee
2. Structural only 10% additional
3. Fire-Life 10%additional
4. U.P.C. 2% additional
5. N.E.C. 2% additional
6. U.M.C. 2% additional
7. Title 24 Energy and Sound Control 2% additional
8. Title 24 Disabled Access 2% additional
PLAN CHECK OF REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS:
Revisions to previously approved plans will be at Esgil Corporation's published hourly rate shown
on the "Labor Rates Schedule."
R:'BROCKMEI/AGMTS"ESGILx, VPD 9/22'9g ch
CITY OF TE~IECULA
AGREE3IENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREE3IENT. is made and effective as of July I, 1998, between the City of
Temecula. a municipal corporation ("City") and VanDorpe Chou Associates Inc.. ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set tbrth herein. the parties ag-ree as tbllows:
1. TER~I. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1998. and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed. but in no event later than June 31, 2001. unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERXqCES. Consultant shall per/brm the tasks described and set ti~rth in Exhibit
A. attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set ti3rth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks
according to the schedule of perti~rmance xvhich is also set tBrth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORi~'IANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithtally, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, pertbrm all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ,
at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYNIENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and
terms and the schedule of payment as set tbrth in Exhibit B. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for
actual services pertbrmed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for
services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
tem~inate this Agreement, or any portion hereof; by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior
~vritten notice. Upon receipt of said notice. the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement. unless the notice provides othersvise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section. the City shall pay
to Consultant the actual value of the work pertbrmed up to the time of termination, provided that the ~vork
pertbrmed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the
Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply ~vith the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default tbr cause under the terms of this Agreement.
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant tbr any work pertbrmed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such
failure by the Consultant to make progess in the perlbrmance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond
the Consultant's control, and without tault or negligence of the Consultant. it shall not be considered a
default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in
the pertbrmance or' any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement. it shall serve the Consultant with
written notice of the detault. The Consultant shall have (10) days alter service upon it of said notice in which
-I-
R: BROCKME[AGMTS V..XNDORPE,\VPD ,~ 6 9x cb
to cure the default bv render ,.,g a satisthctor7 performance. In the event ..~t the Consultant fails to cure its
dethult within such period of time. the Citv shall have the right. notwithstanding any other provision of this
A~eement. to terminate this A~eement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy
to which it may be entitled at law, in equity. or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCU)IENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs.
expenses, receipts and other such intbrmation required by City. that relate to the pertbrmance of services
under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail
to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall
provide fi-ee access to the representatives of Ci.ty or its designees at reasonable times to such books and
records, shall give City. the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make
transcripts theretotom as necessary, and. shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and
activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents. shall be maintained
tbr a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion oC or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement.
all original documents. desi~mns, drawings, maps, models. computer files. surveys, notes. and other documents
prepared in the course of providing the services to be pertbrmed pursuant to this A~eement shall become
the sole property of the City and may be used. reused or othenvise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files. Consultant shall make available to the City,
upon reasonable ,,,,Titten request by the City, the necessary computer sotbare and hardware tbr purposes of
accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the tense of the design at a location other than that
specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wTOngfUl acts or omissions in
pertbrming or tb. iling to pertbrm under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of
the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims tbr injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection ~vith the pertbrmance of the work hereunder by the Consultant. its agents,
representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence tbrm CG 000 t ).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of Calitbmia and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
prot~zssion.
R: [3ROCKMEI :\GMTS.VANDORPE.WI~D S o'98 cb
the Ciw. Ail endorsements ,~,e to be received and aDproved bv the City ,,ct'ore work comrnences. As an
alternative to the Citv's tbrms. the Consuitant's insurer may provide complete. certified copies of all required
!nsurance policies. including endorsements eft~cting the coverage reqmred bv these spec~E~,catIons.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shalt at aIl times remain as to the City a whollv independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this A~eement on behalf of Consultant shall at all
times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City. nor any of its officers. employees
or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or anv of Consultant's officers. employees or
agents. except as set tbrth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at anv time or in anv manner represent
that it or anv of its officers. employees or agents are in any manner officers. employees or agents of the Ci.ty.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt. obligation or liabili.ty whatever against City,
or bind Ciw in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection ~vith the
perthfinance of this Agreement. Except tbr the ~es paid to Consultant as provided in the A~eement, City
shall not pay salaries. wages. or other compensation to Consultant tbr pertbrming services hereunder tbr
Citw. City shall not be liable tbr compensation or indemnification to Consultant tbr injury, or sickness arising
out of per~brming services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itselfin~brmed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner afibct those employed by it or in any way affect the
perthfinance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times obsen'e and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees. shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by t~ilure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORi~IATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from
the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of
support. testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other imbrmation concerning the work
pertbrmed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to
a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such
court order or subpoena.
' ?,bU3( KX.I!:! x~ iX.! I'S V ',",[)l !b'p!: '~ pt'} ' ,, '~< 'b
b. Coh~uitant shall promptly notify City should Cu.suitant, ~ts officers. employees.
agents or subcontractors be served w~th any summons. complaint. subpoena. notice of deposition. request
tbr documents. interrogator~es. request tbr admissions or other discoverv request. court order or subpoena
from any parry. regarding this Agn'eement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project
or property. located within the Cirv. Ciw retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant
and/or be present at any deposition. hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fillly with
City. and to provide Citv with the opportunity to review any response to discoverv requests provided by
Consultant. However. City's right to review anv such response does not imply or mean the right by City to
control. direct. or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party. mav desire to give to the other party,
under this Agn'eement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery. by a
reputable document detivery service, such as but not limited to. Federal Express. that provides a receipt
showing date and time of deliver,. or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail. certified mail. postage prepaid.
return receipt requested. addressed to the address of the party. as set tbrth below or at any other address as
that party. may later designate by Notice:
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, Catitbrnia 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
VanDorpe Chou Associates, Inc.
295 N. Rampert St.
Orange, CA 92668
Attention: Nell Evans
14. ASSIGNSlENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement. nor any part thereof nor any monies due hereunder. without prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement. Consultant sole compensation shall be the value of the City of the
services rendered.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall have
in full t~rce and effect. all licenses required of it by taw tBr the performance of the sere'ices described in this
Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agee that the laws
of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations. duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Ageement and also govern the interpretation of this Ageement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement
shall take place in the municipal. superior. or t~2deral district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City
of Temecuta. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Agreement. the prevailing party
as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney l~es and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements. understandings. representations and statements. oral or written. are merged
into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party. is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation
or' any and all facts such part.,,, deems material.
18. At,, dORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREL.,iENT. The person or persons
executing this A~eement on behalf or' Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authoriw
to execute this Ageement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority. to bind Consultant to the
pertbrmance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TE~IECULA
Ron Ro'berts. Mayor
Attest:
(,, ,,,._~n W. Jone~,,,C~Z~ty'' '' Clerk
Approved As to Form: '
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
VanDorpe Chou Associates Inc
'~ !~!~1)<"~2',1I:1 \(5\1T% VXND(3RP[: \VII[', '< tl ,lq cb
ITEM 11
APPROVA,~
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIR OF FINANCE
GIT~ MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Financ ~
July 27, 1999
Authorization to Execute the Supplemental Agreement for the Fiscal Year 1999-00
Community Development Block Grant Funds
PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst. J~--r
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the Fiscal Year
1999-00 Community Development Block Grant Funds.
That the City Council authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient
Agreements for administration of the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Community Development
Block Grant Funds.
DISCUSSION: On January 26, 1999, The City Council recommended funding for Fiscal Year
1999-00 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects. The U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development provides CDBG funding for local projects which meet at least one of the
following nationally established goals:
The activity benefits 51 percent low/moderate income persons; or,
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or,
The activity meets an emergent community development need.
The projects and levels of funding approved by the Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA)
are as follows:
Domestic Violence
Senior Citizen Emergency Food Pantry
Community Access Housing Assistance
Parent Center
Operation School Bell
Boys and Girls Club
Home Based Early Intervention Program
Senior Citizen Center Expansion
$ 7 000
10 000
2 000
1 750
10 000
10 000
2 000
270.951
Total CDBG Funding $313,701
Execution of the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Supplement Agreement and Sub-Recipient Agreement
facilitates CDBG funding for these projects. The actual CDBG award of $313,701 is $28,701 more
than the projected amount approved by the City Council on January 26, 1999. The County Economic
Development Agency has added the additional $28,701 to the Senior Citizen Center Expansion
project.
Fiscal Impact: CDBG funds will be budgeted in a special revenue fund for the approved
programs and projects.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
File: 0,324, 0,341, 0.342, 1.156, 1.167, 1,169, 1.TM066, 1.TM067
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called,
"COUNTY," and the CITY OF Temecula, herein called "CITY," mutually
agree as follows:
1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation
8 Agreement dated July 16, 1996, whereby CITY elected to participate
9 with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County" for purposes of
10 receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to
11 assist and undertake essential community development and housing
12 assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and Community
13 Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act"
14 Said Cooperation Agreement dated July 16, 1996, is incorporated herein
15 by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and every
16 provision was set forth herein.
17 2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist
18 with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction,
19 by utilizing the sum of $313,701, CDBG Entitlement Funds, as
20 specifically identified in Exhibit"A" which are attached hereto and
21 consist of 3 pages (each), and by this reference are incorporated
22 herein, for the projects:
23 0 324 - Services to Victims and Children of Domestic Violence - $7,000
24 0 341 - Senior Citizen Emerqency Food Pantry - $10,000
25 0 342 - Community Access Housinq Assistance - $2,000
26 1 156 - Parent Center - $1,750
27 1 167 - Operation School Bell - $10,000
28 1 169 - Boys & Girls Club of Temecula - Murrieta Branch - $10,000
1
1 1.TM066 - Home Based Early Intervention Program - $2,000
2 1.TM067 - Senior Citizen Center Expansion - $270,951
3 CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through its Economic Development
4 Agency, of the projects plans and specifications prior to CITY's
5 construction of same when a project consists of a construction
6 activity.
7 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement for the
8 projects shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 1999 to
9 June 30, 2000, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set
10 forth in Exhibits (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, or H). In the event that the
11 projects are not substantially completed by the time set forth in the
12 completion schedule due to unforeseen or uncontrollable causes, the
13 schedule for the completion of the project may be extended by the
14 period of the enforced delay. Times of performance may also be
15 extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and COUNTY. If
16 substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the
17 completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY of the projects are not
18 made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend
19 or terminate this agreement by the procedures set forth in the Section
20 titled "Termination", of this agreement and the entitlement funds
21 associated with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after
22 appropriate notice is given.
23 4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shall
24 determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received
25 by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of Paragraphs
26 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development
27 Agency, shall: (1) make payment of the grant funds to CITY as
28 designated in Exhibit "A" and (2) monitor the project activity to
1 ensure compliance with applicable federal regulations and the terms
2 of this Agreement. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of funds
3 by submitting monthly requests for reimbursement. All disbursements
4 of grant funds will be on a reimbursement basis and made within thirty
5 (30) days after the CITY has submitted its letter identifying payments
6 and documentation which supports expenditures. All authorized
7 obligations incurred in the performance of the Agreement must be
8 reported by June 1, 2000 for projects eligible under 570.201(e),
9 Public Services.
10 5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate
11 with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing
12 assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public
13 assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its
14 Strategic Plan of the Consolidated Plan and other requirements of the
15 Community Development Block Grant Program.
16 6. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
17 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA). Pursuant to Section 15051(d) of
18 Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated as
19 the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of this
20 Agreement.
21 7. HOLD HARMLESSAND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply with
22 all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify, save
23 and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and their respective
24 agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liabilities,
25 claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and causes of action
26 of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but not by way of
27 limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense of said parties,
28 and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner
1 connected with the performance by CITY under this Agreement.
2 8. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS.
3 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in
4 accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A-87 as
5 applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal
6 funds under this Agreement.
7 b. CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG
8 Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits (A, B, C, D, E,
9 F, G, or H).
10 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make
11 available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban
12 Development for examination and copying all of its records and other
13 materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement.
14 d. CITY shall not retain any program income as defined
15 in Section 570.500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations.
16 Said program income shall be used only for the activities that are the
17 subject of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement
18 shall apply to such activities.
19 e. The CITY shall ensure projects that are serving
20 limited clientele (570.208(a)(2)(i), that at least fifty-one percent
21 (51%) of the persons benefitting from the CDBG funded activities are
22 of low and moderate income and meet the program income guidelines
23 attached as Exhibits (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, or H). The CITY must
24 provide the direct benefit documentation required.
25 9. FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS. CITY shall comply with the
26 provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal
27 regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the
28 Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations
4
1 found in Part 85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal
2 Regulations. CITY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any
3 subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the
4 Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited
5 in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement.
6 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants
7 and employees shall act at all times in an independent capacity during
8 the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not be, nor
9 shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, officers or
10 employees of the COUNTY.
11 11. TERMINATION.
12 a. CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement except
13 upon express written consent of COUNTY.
14 b. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph
15 lla, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written
16 notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action:
17 (1) In the event CITY fails to perform the
18 covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as
19 provided in this Agreement; and
20 (2) In the event there is a conflict with any
21 federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule rendering
22 any of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or untenable; or
23 (3) In the event the funding from the Department
24 of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2
25 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable.
II
28 /1
5
1 c. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees to
2 return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY.
3 In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of
4 action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement.
5 d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not
6 to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are
7 cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions.
8 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 570.601
9 and 570.602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations which
10 requires that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of
11 race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participation
12 in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under
13 any program or activity funded in whole or in
14 part with Community Development funds.
15 13. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
16 a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants,
17 officers and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar
18 with and shall comply with the CDBG regulations prohibiting conflicts
19 of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit
20 "CI" and by this reference incorporated herein.
21 b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants,
22 officers, and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar
23 with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the County's CDBG Policy
24 manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference
25 incorporated herein.
26 c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of
27 exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of
28 interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR
6
1 570.611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be
2 reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate
3 for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is
4 appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors
5 listed in 24 CFR 570.611 (e).
6 d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall
7 provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents, consultants,
8 officers and elected and appointed officials who are in a position to
9 participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or
10 responsibilities, or gain inside
11 information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this
12 Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNTY any potential
13 conflict, including even the appearance of conflict, that may arise
14 with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement.
15 e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a
16 material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be
17 immediately terminated by the COUNTY.
18 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY
19 shall bear no liability for any later determination by the United
20 States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban Development or
21 any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligible under 24
22 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG funds.
23 15. USE OF PROPERTY. Whenever federal CDBG funds or program
24 income are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment
25 or personal property, the property shall not be transferred from its
26 originally funded use for a period of five (5) years from the date
27 that the City is no longer a part of the urban COUNTY program. The
28 CITY shall maintain an inventory for COUNTY review.
7
1 16. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CITY
2 agrees to notify and to require any lessee or assignee to notify
3 Riverside County Workforce Development Center/JTPA and GAIN -
4 Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings that
5 are caused by this project.
6 17. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the
7 project funded pursuant to this Agreement, during the term of this
8 Agreement, will make reference to the Contribution of the County of
9 Riverside Community Development Block Grant Program in making the
10 project possible.
11 18. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION. CITY shall be
12 monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely
13 compliance with the provisions of this Agreement and the effective and
14 efficient achievement of the Program Objectives. Quarterly reports
15 shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the
16 end of the quarter being reported. The quarterly written reports
17 shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data
18 elements:
19 a. Title of program, listing of components, description
20 of activities/operations.
21 b. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also
22 the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify
23 by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting
24 the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered
25 in meeting goals.
26 //
27 //
28 //
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Beneficiaries
Provide the following:
1) Total number of direct beneficiaries
2) Percent of total number of direct beneficiaries
who are:
· Low and moderate income
· Low income
· Black, not Hispanic origin
· White, not Hispanic origin
· Hispanic
· American Indian/Alaskan Native
· Asian or Pacific Islander
· Female Headed Households
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this
Agreement together with the cooperation Agreement between the parties,
embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation to the
subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or understanding,
verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between
the parties at the time of execution.
20. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Executive Director of the COUNTY's
Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are authorized
to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate
to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Agreement
as it may be amended from time to time by COIINTY.
//
//
//
//
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be
modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized
and empowered representative of COUNTY and CITY respectively.
DATED:
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy
(Seal)
DATED:
ATTEST:
CITY OF Temecula
By:
Mayor
F: \USERS\CDBG\lST\TM\Supagr99. 066
10
EXHIBIT A FILE: 0,324
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: Alternatives to Domestic Violence (ADV)
Address:
P.O. Box 910, 92502
Project Title:
Services to Victims and Children of Domestic Violence
Location: County Wide
Description: Alternative to Domestic Violence (ADV) through their Services to
Victims of Domestic Violence program will respond to at least 8,000 calls on the
24 hour Crisis line (Toll free, county wide), provide crisis intervention
counseling, information and referrals. ADV will provide emergency shelter to
approximately 70 battered women and 120 children through Horizon house for a
total of 3,600 bednights. CDBG funds will be used for cost associated with
operating the program salaries/benefits and operating expenses (telephone, rent,
equipment, supplies, travel and assistance to individuals).The funds will allow
ADV to continue and expand current services to 800 new clients with individual
counseling, advocacy, support groups, emergency food and clothing, assistance
with temporary restraining orders and emergency transportation through their
regional Outreach Centers and Extended Service Sites.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 7,000
$ 7,000
11
EXHIBIT B FILE:' 0.341
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Valley, Inc.
Address:
40250 Winchester Road, 92593
Project Title:
Senior Citizen Emergency Food Pantry
Location: 40250 Winchester Road, Temecula CA
Description: The senior center provides an emergency food program for 28,000
individuals that may be homeless, elderly, handicapped and for migrant farm
workers. CDBG finds will be used to purchase food and supplies, also operational
cost, salaries, and travel.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
Cost
CDBG Approved
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
12
EXHIBIT C FILE: 0.342
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: Community Access Housinq Assistance
Address: 4960 Arlington Suite C, Riverside
Project Title:
Community Access Housinq Assistance
Location: 4960 Arlinqton Suite C, Riverside
Description: Community Access Center (CAC)provides services to people with
disabilities. The CDBG Grant will allow CAC staff to provide additional outreach
to Temecula residents with disabilities. The outreach will target four
identified concerns in the Temecula area: 1) private businesses which are
otherwise inaccessible; 2) difficulty in finding accessible and affordable
housing; 3) inappropriate placement of persons under age 65 in nursing homes;
and 4) the need for modifications and adaptations for homeowners who have aged
or become disabled. CDBG funds will be used for salaries, supplies, and
affordable housing assistance.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
13
EXHIBIT D
Page 1
Cooperative Agency:
FILE: 1.156
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Parent Center - Murrieta Valley Unified School District
Address: 24150 Hayes Avenue, 92562
Project Title: Parent Center
Location: 24150 Hayes Avenue, Murrieta, CA 92562
Description: The Parent Center will provide services to 1,400 parents and 1,300
children that are from low/moderate income families. Services that are provided
by the Parent Center are Adult Education Programs, preparation for Citizenship,
English as a second language and GED; four (4) basic parenting classes in
English and Spanish; two (2) Co-Parenting classes in English and Spanish; four
(4) programs for parents with high risk adolescents that have problems with
drugs, alcohol, truancy, sexual behavior and oppositional behavior; bi-monthly
parenting newsletters and other information essential for parenting in the 90's
in English and Spanish. Truancy, sexual behavior and oppositional behavior; bi-
monthly parenting newsletters and other information essential for parenting in
the 90's in English and Spanish.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 1,750
$ 1,750
14
EXHIBIT E FILE: 1.167
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: Assistance Leaque of Temecula Valley
Address:
28720 Via Montezuma, 92590
Project Title:
Operation School Bell
Location: 28720 Via Montezuma, Temecula, CA 92590
Description: Assistance League Of Temecula Valley through their Operation
School Bell program will provide eight hundred (800) low/moderate income
children with shoes, six pairs of socks, six pairs of underwear, two T-shirts
or blouses, two pairs of jeans, slacks or skirts, a sweater, a heavy jacket,
backpack (containing notebook, pencils or pens, hygiene items, and reading
book). CDBG Funds will be used to assist in purchasing the above listed items.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
15
EXHIBIT F FILE: 1.169
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: Boys & Girls Club of Temecula
Address: 28790 Pujol St., 92590
Project Title: Boys & Girls Club of Temecula - Murrieta Branch
Location: 28790 Pujol St., Temecula, CA 92590/Cal Oaks Sports Park Modular
Unit & Shivela Middle School
Description: Boys & Girls Club of Temecula will provide child care services
through the off track and AM/PM program, Monday through Friday. The program
will run year round providing child care for 520 school age children from 1st
through 8th grade. CDBG funds will be used for tuition, supplies, equipment and
travel.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
Cost CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
16
EXHIBIT G FILE: 1.TM066
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: V.I.P. Tots
Address:
43200 Business Park Drive, 92590
Project Title:
Home-Based Early Intervention Program
Location: 41915 Acacia Avenue, Hemet, CA 92544
Description: V.I.P. Tots will offer a comprehensive home based early intervention
program for children with disabilities and their families. Services that are
provided are for child development, special education, and therapists specializing
in pediatric, occupational, physical and speech therapies. CDBG funds will provide
for travel reimbursement & cost of communication equipment.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct
Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on
a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating
NO SERVICE.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
17
EXHIBIT G
Page 2
FILE: 1.TM066
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Start Date
Begin Program Services July 1,
Monthly Claim Submittal
Monthly Direct Benefit Report Submittal
1999
Submit Quarterly Report
(in accordance to section 26
of Sponsor's Agreement)
Semi-Annual Monitoring Site
Visit
Submit Final Claim for Reimbursement
Program Services Complete
December 1, 1999
Completion Date
October 15, 1999
January 15, 2000
April 30, 2000
June 30, 2000
June 1, 2000
June 30, 2000
3O
EXHIBIT G
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
July 1, 1999
June 30, 2000
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Home-Based Early
Intervention Program
6. PROJECT NUMBER
1.TM066
FILE:l.TM066
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-99-UC-06-0506
X Original (each year)
Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT
V.I.P. Tots
9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
909-652-7611
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: V.I.P. Tots will offer a comprehensive home based
early intervention program for children with disabilities and their families.
Services that are provided are for child development, special education, and
therapists specializing in pediatric, occupational, physical and speech therapies.
CDBG funds will provide for travel reimbursement & cost of communication
equipment.
ELIGIBILITY:570.201 (e)
BENEFIT: Low Mod Limited Clientele Presumed
11. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT (S)
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: V.I.P. Tots will provide services to 40 children
with disabilities.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067. ) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
S S $
Public Services
$2,000
14. Totals $ 2,000 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $ 2,000
19
EXHIBIT H FILE: 1.TM067
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula
Address: 43200 Business Park Drive, 92590
Project Title:
Senior Citizen Center Expansion
Location: 41854 6th Street, Temecula
Description: CDBG funds will be used for the design & construction of the
Centers' interior kitchen improvements at the Mary Phillips Senior Center. This
is a three year project.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
$ 270,951
$ 270,951
2O
EXHIBIT H
Page 2
FILE: 1.TM067
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Start Date
Completion Date
Begin Program Services July 1,
Monthly Claim Submittal
Monthly Direct Benefit Report Submittal
Submit Quarterly Report
(in accordance to section 26
of Sponsor's Agreement)
1999
Semi-Annual Monitoring Site
Visit
Submit Final Claim for Reimbursement
Program Services Complete
December 1, 1999
October 15, 1999
January 15, 2000
April 30, 2000
June 30, 2000
June 1, 2000
June 30, 2000
33
EXHIBIT H
Page 3
FILE:l.TM067
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
July 1, 1999
June 30, 2000
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-99-UC-06-0506
X Original (each year)
__Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Senior Citizen Center
Expansion
6. PROJECT NUMBER
1.TM067
7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
City of Temecula 909-694-6480
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CDBG funds will be used for the design &
construction of the Centers' interior kitchen improvements at the Mary Phillips
Senior Center. This is a three year project.
ELIGIBILITY:570.201 (c)
BENEFIT: Low Mod Limited Clientele Presumed
11. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT (S)
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Design and construct interior of Senior Center.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067. ) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
$ $ $
Public Facilities
$270,951
14. Totals $ 270,951 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c $ 270,951
22
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4
§ 570.611 Conflict of interest.
(a) Applicability.
(1)
In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by
recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at
§ 570.204(c)), the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB
Circular A 110, respectively, shall apply.
(2)
In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the
provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the
acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of
assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals,
businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which
authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other
improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to
§ 570,202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses,
individuals and other private entities pursuant to § 570.203, § 570.204 or
§ 570.455).
(b) Conflicts prohibited. Except for the use of CDBG funds to pay salaries and
other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no persons
described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised any
functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG activities assisted under this
part or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain
inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or
financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an interest in
any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds
thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business
ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the
above restrictions shall apply to all activities that are a part of the UDAG
project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time after,
such person's tenure.
(c) Persons covered. The conflict of interest provisions of paragraph (b) of
this section apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or
elected official or appointed official of the recipient, or of any designated public
agencies, or subrecipients which are receiving funds under this part.
(d) Exceptions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the
recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this
section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that such an exception will serve
to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient administration
of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be considered only after
the recipient has provided the following:
(1)
A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance
that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description of
how the public disclosure was made; and
35
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4
(e)
(2)
An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest for which
the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law.
Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant a
requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the
requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the
cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable:
(1
Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an
essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would
otherwise not be available;
(2
Whether an opportunity was provided for open competitive bidding or
negotiation;
(3
Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low or
moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the
assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person to
receive generally the same interests or benefits as are being made
available or provided to the group or class;
(4
Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions
or responsibilities, or'the decision making process with respect to
the specific assisted activity in question;
(5
Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected
person was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this
section;
(6
Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient or the
person affected when weighed against the public interest served by
avoiding the prohibited conflict; and
(7
Any other relevant considerations.
36
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit CI, page 3 of 4
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 1 of 2)
TOPIC:
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: October 1989
This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with Federal Regulations (24
CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal
Governments" require that grantees and sub-grantees will maintain a written code of
standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the
award and administration of contracts.
1) No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the selection,
in the award or in the administration of a contract supported by Federal Funds if
a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved.
2) Such a conflict will arise when:
i) The employee, officer or agent;
ii) Any member of the immediate family;
iii) His/Her partners, or;
iv)
An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the above
has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award.
3) The grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither
solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors
or parties to sub-agreements except as noted in Section 4.
4) A grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will be presumed
to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the
following:
i)
Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect
investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more.
ii)
Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest
worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more.
37
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 2 of 2)
TOPIC:
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: October 1989
iii)
Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a
commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms
available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two
hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or
promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the
decision is made.
Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner,
trustee, employee, or holds any position of management.
v)
Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts
aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to,
received by, or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the
time when the decision is made.
5)
For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means any investment
or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of an official, by an agent
on behalf of an official, or by a business entity or trust in which the official,
the official's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly,
or beneficially a 10-percent interest or more.
38
ITEM 12
APPROVAL _/()~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN E
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Coundl
Grant M. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
July 27, 1999
Memorandum of Understanding for Emergency Ambulance Services
PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency,
for joint monitoring of Ambulance Services.
BACKGROUND: City staff has been working cooperatively with the staff of Riverside County's
Emergency Medical Services Agency to monitor the services provided by the County's ambulance
provider, American Medical Response (AMR).
The County has AMR under contract to provide ambulance services until June 30, 2003. The attached
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) will formally recognize the City's right to mutually review the
operations of AMR, with the EMS Agency, to ensure that ambulance services provided to residents in
the City meet the required standards as spelled out in the contract between the County and AMR.
AMR is required to respond to 90% of all 911 emergency calls within ten (10) minutes. If they are late,
then fines, of up to $200 per call, are assessed by the EMS Agency. This MOU also establishes the
legal framework for the creation of the Southwest County Ambulance Zone. This zone includes the
Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore. The Southwest Zone meets quarterly to
monitor AMR's performance and provides an opportunity for each City to share concerns directly with
the EMS Agency and AMR. In addition, all fines collected by the EMS Agency will be distributed back
to the titles to pay for such things as supplies, equipment and/or training. The Zone Committee agrees
as to how the actual monies are to be spent.
On July 13th, a Southwest Zone meeting was held and the performance of AMR was reviewed. Based
upon this review, it was determined that AMR's response times dipped slightly below the 90%
compliance requirement in May/June of 1999. Based on this information and the overall increased
activity of the zone, AMR has agreed to add another 12-hour ambulance in the Menifee area to help
provide additional resources to the Zone during the day. This will help ensure that ambulances,
stationed in Temecula, are less likely to be taken out of the City for hospital transfer services, which
should result in AMR's 90% compliance for the zone.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact for approving this MOU.
Attachment
R:~DAMSA\COUNCILx,MOU-Amlx~tn~ Scrvlc~.doe
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR JOINT MONITORING OF
EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICES
This MOU is entered into pursuant to Schedule E-I in the Agreement for "ALS Exclusive
Operating Areas - American Medical Response Master Contract" (hereafter referred to as "the
Contract"). The City of Temecula hereby known as "City", and the County of Riverside, acting
through its Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency, do enter into this Agreement with
reference to the following facts:
Ao
The participants agree to consult on issues regarding provider performance, changes or
cancellation of the contract with the provider and distribution of performance penalty
monies received under the performance based contract and other decisions related to
administration of the contract.
By entering into this MOU, the participants do not waive or otherwise relinquish any
legal rights or obligations as they may have under law.
Now therefore the participants agree as follows:
The EMS Agency will provide staff for day-to-day management and administration of the
Contract with regular reporting of performance to the EMS Administrative Group
described in #2 below.
Each participating agency will designate an individual to serve on an EMS
Administrative Group that will mutually review performance reports, monitor contract
compliance and determine use and allocation of performance penalty monies received
from the provider as well as other duties mutually agreed to, on behalf of the city. The
individual will be the City Manager or designee from each city, the Riverside County Fire
Chief or designee in the unincorporated areas, and the EMS Agency Director or designee.
o
The term of this agreement shall begin September 15, 1998 and run through June 30,
2003, or throughout the term of the Contract if extended, with the emergency ambulance
provider.
There shall be no assessments to the City for the costs of administering the Contract or
this MOU.
,
Performance standards will be as specified in the Contract between Riverside County and
the emergency ambulance provider, or as otherwise modified from time to time.
o
City may request modified services as provided by the Contract, subject to negotiated
costs or savings and EMS Agency approval.
MOU
Page 2 of 2
10.
City will invoice the County of Riverside EMS Agency annually for payment of
penalties.
Ambulance rates will be set in accordance with County and HSA policy with input from
the involved cities.
All notices, statements, demands, requests, consents, approvals, authorizations,
agreements, appointments or designations hereunder shall be given in writing and
addressed to each party to this MOU.
The participants agree to cooperate in carrying out the purposes and intent of this MOU
and to execute, acknowledge and deliver all additional agreements, instruments or other
writings reasonably necessary to carry out this MOU. However, no party hereto shall be
compelled to surrender its discretionary powers of approval as contemplated in this MOU
by virtue of this covenant.
City of Temecula
Signature
Date
Title
County of Riverside Date
ITEM 13
CITY ATTORNEY ~~
,,~O,,~ .~.
DIRECTOR OF FINAN E ~
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager
July 27, 1999
Riverside County Library Contract Amendment
Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analys~,,~,,
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to Agreement to Provide Library
Services (Additional Staff).
Authorize the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $150,000 to fund the Temecula Library
Volunteer Coordinator half-time position, and to subsidize funding to maintain the Senior
Reference Librarian and Reference Librarian positions at the fiscal year 1998-99 level for fiscal
year 1999-00.
BACKGROUND: Since July 1, 1997, the Riverside County Library System (RCLS) has been
operating under a contract with Library Systems and Services, Inc. This contract is administered
by RCLS by breaking the County into three service areas. The Temecula Library is in the Mid-South
Zone Service Area, and receives funding from the Temecula, Sun City, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake,
San Jacinto, Valle Vista, Idyllwild, Calimesa, and Anza regions.
For the past two years, the Temecula Branch Library has been open to the general public for 48
hours per week with the following positions staffed:
Position Title
Number of Full Time
Ecluivalents (FTE)
Librarian 1
Reference Librarian 2
Library Associate 1
Library Assistance 2.5
Volunteer Coordinator .5
Library Page 4
Total 11
As of July 1, 1998, the City of Murrieta is no longer part of the RCLS, and the library property taxes
which are generated within the Murrieta City Limit have been redirected from RCLS to the City of
Murrieta. This has resulted in a revenue shortfall of approximately $350,000 to the Mid-South Zone
for this fiscal year.
Due to the reduction in funds available, without the augmented funding from the City of Temecula,
the County would have to reduce the number of personnel assigned to the Library as follows:
-- Library full time equivalents would be reduced from 1 FTE to .75 FTE.
-- Reference Librarian would be reduced from 2 FTE's to .25 FTE.
-- The Volunteer Coordinator position would be eliminated. This Coordinator has not only assisted
the library staff, but has managed to apply an average of over 600 volunteer hours per month to
library operations.
The Temecula Library is currently operating at 48 hours per week. As of September 1 st, the number
of hours the Library is open will increase to 52 hours per week.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funding is available in Account 001-101-999-5285 to fund the
$150,000 augmentation requested.
Attachment: Second Amendment to Agreement to Provide Library Services (Additional Staff)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LIBRARY SERVICES
(Additional Staff)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM
and
CITY OF TEMECULA
(Fiscal Year 1999-2000)
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside, Riverside County Library System ("County"),
and the City of Temecula ("City"), and the contracted administrator for County, Library
Systems & Services, LLC, commonly known as "LSSI" CLSSI") have entered into an
agreement to provide library services (additional staff) for the period ending June 30, 1998
(the "Agreement"), as mended, and the parties wish to further mend the Agreement, to be
effective on July 1, 1999;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
Section 1. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTIES is mended to read as follows:
"1.1 Services Performed by County: County shall provide two (2) Reference
Librarians, and one (1) Library Volunteer Coordinator (the "Employees") for
the Temecula Branch for the period of July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000. The
Employees shall be subject to the supervision of LSSI, pursuant to the LSSI
agreement with the County. All duties and activities of County under this
Agreement shall be subject to the oversight of the County Librarian for the
Riverside County Library System ("County Librarian").
1.2 City Payment of Cost of Employee: City shall pay the actual salary paid to and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
benefits paid on behalf of the Employee for the term of this Agreement, as
amendment, in an amount not to exceed $150,000."
B. Each and every reference to "employee" in sections 2, and 3 shall be amended to read
"employees".
C. Section 4.2 Term is amended to add the following paragraph to the end of the existing
section, as amended:
"The term of this Agreement is extended, and shall include the time period from July
1, 1999 through June 30, 2000. City or County may terminate this Agreement, as
amended, for no cause, on the giving of thirty (30) days written notice to the other
party."
D. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall
remain in full force and effect.
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, County, City, and LSSI have caused this Second Amendment to
be duly executed by the parties hereto.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
City Manager
By:
Chairperson, Board of Supervisors
Attest:
City Clerk
Attest:
Gerald A. Maloney, Clerk
By:
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
By:
Assistant City Attorney
By:
Deputy County Counsel
LIBRARY SYSTEMS AND SERVICES,
LLC
By:
Christopher D. Traut
President
f:\probate\lfuruta\libraryX2amd-svc.tem
By:
Frank Pezzanite
Secretary
ITEM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
GITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANG
GITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
/'/¢~illiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
Ci:tywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services
PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award the Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc.
for $150,000.00 authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of
$15,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: In June, 1999 Request for Proposals (RFP) and specifications for the
Citywide Tree Trimming Contract were sent to twelve (12) tree trimming contractors. On July 6, 1999
three (3) bids were received for Public Works right-of-way tree maintenance.
The following proposals were submitted:
West Coast Arborists
Golden Bear Arborists
J. Williams Landscape
After review, staff recommends West Coast Arborists in light of the specific unit prices (see attached
proposal).
The work to be performed includes Class I tree trimming, tree and stump removals, root pruning, tree
planting and emergency work call-outs. This work is necessary to maintain approximately 7,500 right-of-
way trees known as the City's Urban Forest. The contractor will inventory all right-of-way trees by name,
size and locations.
Staff have reviewed the bid proposal from West Coast Arborists and found it to be acceptable. West
Coast Arbodsts has performed work in the past for the City of Temecula, and we have found their work
to be satisfactory.
A copy of the proposals are attached (Exhibit "A") for review.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Street Maintenance Account 001-164-
601-5402. The total project amount is $165,000.00 which includes the contract amount of $150,000.00
plus the 10% contingency of $15,000.00.
r:\agdrpl\99\072 7\treeaward/ajp
ATTACHMENT:
1. Exhibit"A"
2. Contract
r:\agdrpt\99\0727\treeaward/ajp
EXHIBIT "A"
r:\agdrpl\99\0727\treeaward/ajp
West Coast Arborists, Inc.
2200 E. Via Burton Street · Anaheim, CA 92806
(714) 991-1900 · (800) 521-3714 ° Fax (714) 956-3745
June 17, 1999
City of Temecula
ATTN: City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Dear City Clerk,
west Coast Arborists, Inc. has achieved a long and successful history in the tree care industry in California.
We have completed contracts for maintenance of trees for more than 65 cities throughout California.
We are pleased to be able to provide the following proposal to the City of Temecula for Maintenance of
Municipal Trees. We are in receipt of your specifications, have reviewed them, and are interested in being
engaged to perform according to their stipulations.
We have carefully examined the City's tree population and are confident that our company can provide you
with the highest quality and standards for tree maintenance available in the marketplace today. After your
review of the information provided here, feel free to contact our main office at 800/521-3714.
We are licensed by the California State Contractors License Board under license #366764. We have held
this license in good standing since 1976. The license specializes in Class C61 (Tree Service) as well as Class
C27 (Landscaping). We recently received an A+ rating from the bonding board. We currently employ over
thirty five ISA Certified Arborists and over sixty Certified Treeworkers, as recognized by the Western Chapter
of the ISA.
We look forward to continuing a successful business relationship with the City of Temecula in the near future.
Respectfully sub ttted,
ProJ~ssiona! Tree Maintemmce Organization
JUN-25-99 12~2G FROM:CITY OF TEMECULA ID:909594G477 PAGE 14/19
CITY OF TEMECULA
TREE TRIMMING RFP
BID PRICES FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING CONTRACT
BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 7,500 TREES IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA
1 0
4.0
STREET TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - FULL TRIM
PALM TREE TRIMMING
COMPLETE TREE & STUMP REMOVAL
STUMP REMOVAL
~lOOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER
ROOT PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER
(10' X 18" DEEP ROOT OR EQUNALENT)
TREE PLANTING:
each
28.00
each
28.00
diameter inch
15.00
diameter inch
4.00 -- k
60.00
120.00
gal, w/root barrier
gal, wlo root banier
inch box w/root barrier
95. O0 each
80. O0 each
195.00 each
24 inch box wlo root barrier
~ watering
CREW RENTAL - 3 MEN, AERIA~ UNIT, DUMP TRUCK
, CHIPPER
"CREW RENTAL - 2 MEN. AERIAL UNIT, DUMP TRUCK
'CHIPPER
160.00 ! emit
260. O0 day
95. O0 hour
63.33 hour
CREW RENTAL - I MAN e 3 1.6 7 hour
EMERGENCY WORK CALL OUT- 3 MEN INCLUOING ALL $ hot~r
NECESSAKY EQUIPMENT, DISPOSAL FEES, AND ZERO 2 0 0. 0 0
MATERIAL MARK-UP
Attach a statement of qualifications outlining the contractors corporate profile and
contractor's experience in providing Tree trimming services as required by the RFP,
2. Attach a list of client references,
Selected contractor will provide the following documentation upon execution of the contract:
Certificate of Insurance as outlined in the requirements in attachment B,
Patrick Mahoney, President
Name . I,/~//Da ,-~
Sig~~~/'
/
07/02/99
Golden Bear Arborists, Inc.
July 2, 1999
146 E. Railroad Avenue · Monrovia. CA 91016
1626) 359-6647 · FAX (626) 357-5260
Mr. Brad Buron
Maintenance Superintendent
Department of Public Works
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: Tree Trimming RFP
Dear Mr. Buron:
Golden Bear Arborists, Inc. would like to thank you for the oppommity to submit our proposal under this
cover comprising the components of your comprehensive tree maintenance program. The content of this
proposal represents our knowledge, technical innovation, personal development and company spirit
accumulated over the past thirty-one years. From a broad base of operations that includes arboficultural
service, landscape maintenance, landscape construction, and greenwaste recycling, Golden Bear draws on
its experience to provide a high level of care for the trees of the City of Temecula.
Golden Bear has maintained its position at the "leading edge" of the green industry and has developed the
reputation of being a goal oriented, quality focused company that strives to provide economic and
efficient services second to none.
We also believe that the premium level of services, which the City is requesting proposals for. should be
provided by a solid tree care business capable of providing personal and specialized service that is the
benchmark of all other tree trinuning contractors.
Brad Boyajian and Dennis Aidridge ~vill be the contact persons for the City with regard to this submittal.
Both are authorized to bind this organization and can be reached at the Golden Bear corporate office. If
we are chosen for an interview or to make further presentations, Dennis will lead the Golden Bear team.
Please feel free to contact myself or Dennis personally should additional documents or information be
required.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, INC.
md er Kefi m
Contracts Manger
t
I
I
I
P.1~/19
~UM 25 '99
83: 2cjPM
CITY OF TEMECULA
TREE TRIMMING RFP
BID PRICES FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING CONTRACT
BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 7,500 TREES IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA
STRER' TREE TRIMMING - CLEARANCE TRIM $ l .;. ~ j each
STREET TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - FULL TRIM $ 38.43 each
PALM TREE TRIMMING
$ 10.00 ~ach
COMPLETE TREE & STUMP REMOVAL
STUI~,~P REMOVAL
ROOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER
ROO'r PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER
I10' X fir DEEP ROOT OR EQUIVALENTI
TREE PLANTING:
$ 6.50
.80
$
85.00
135.00
diameter inch
diameter inch
each
each
15 gal. w/root bani~r
15 gel wlo root barrier
~ 115.00
~ ~ 69. O0
each
each
24 incll box w/root barrier
260.00
each
24 ind: box wlo root barrier
wateri____,,Z'9
CREW. RENTAL '- 3 MEN. AERIAL UNIT, DUMP TRUCK
CHIPPER
!190.00
365.00
165.00
each
day
hour
CREW RENTAL - 2 MEN. AERIAL UNIT. DUMP TRUCK
CHIPPET
'CREW RENTAL - 1 MAN
' EMERGENCY WORK CALL OUT - 3 MEN INCLUDING ALL
NECESSARY EQUIPMENT, DISPOSAL FEES, AND Z~'RO
MAT'r. RU~L MARK-UP
130.00 hour
40.00
$ 240.00
hour
hour
Attach ,a statement of qualifications outIining the contractors corporate profile and
contractor's experience in providin9 tree trimming services as required by the RFP.
Anach a list of client references.
Sele~{ed contractor will provide the following documentation, upon execution of the contract
Certificate of Insurance as outlined in the requirements in attachment B.
Heather A. Kellstrom'~
Contracts Mana~(r ~July 2, 1999
J. WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, INC.
Serving Orange County since 1964
7392 Earl Circle · Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Telephone: (714) 847-0883 · (800) 592-6999
Fax: (714) 848-1751
Web Page: www.jwtscape.com
Emaih jwldscape@earthlink.net
J. Williams Landscape, Inc. shall provide during the entire length of
the contract a Certified Arborist, trained climbers, trimmers and line
clearance personnel that will be performing all work.
Our company has provided tree-trimming services for Cities and
Homeowners Associations both large and small for 35 years, our
motto is "quality, training and service". L. Williams Landscape, Inc.
has done several tree-trimming contracts for the City of Temecula.
As of April 1, 1999 the company has merged with J. Willlares
Landscape, Inc. which still provides the same qualified personnel.
C 27-401620
JUN-~5-g9 13,~4 F~0H,CITY OF TEHECULA
ID,9~96946477
PAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
TREE TRIMMING RFP
BID PR1CES FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING CONTRACT
eASED ON APPROXIMATELY 7.500 TREES IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA
STREET TRE TRIMMING - CL/,ARANC~ TRLM
STREET TEE AESTHETIC TR4MMING - FULL TRIM
t'PALM TRE~5 TRIMMING
COMPLETIE TREE & ,STUM~ REMOVAL
STUMP REMOVAL
ROOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER
ROOT PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER
~':E~ 18' DEEP ROOT OR IgQ, UfVALEMT)
PLANTING:
15 9at w/root
15 9al. wlo root b~rim
24 ktch box w/root bkrlet
24 inch bo~ wlo root builder
tweTatin
CREW KENTAL · $ MF.N. ABUAL UNIT. DUMP TRUCK
CREW RENTAL - Z
CREW RENTAL - 1 MAN
30.00 PER TREE each
24.00 PER TREE
600.00 PER REMOVAL d~met~r ~h
24" - ~"
200.00 PER GRIND ~ameter ~
24" - 30"
150.00 AVE%GE ~
242.00 AVEP&GE ~
26.00 PER TREE
EMERGF..NCY WORK CALL OUT - 3 MIN INCLUDING ALL
NECESSARY EQI,JtPMeJ~". DLSPOeAL- · FE.F,.~. AND Z,r. RO
MATERIAL. MARK-UP
159.89 PER INSTALL each
65.00 PER INSTALL e~h
357.00 PER INSTALL each
240.00 PER INSTALL ~
125.00 DER DAY
day
295.00 PER HOUR hour
250.00 PER HOUR
45.00 PER HOUR
442.00 PER HOUR
hoMr
hour
hour
Attach a statement of qualifications outlining the contractors corporate profile and
contractor's experience in providing tree Trimrain9 services as required by the RFP.
Attach a List of client references.
SelecTed contractor will provide the following documentation upon execution of the contract:
Certificate of insurance as outlined in the requirements in attachment B.
J . T.'TILLIAMS , PRESIDENT
Name itlelDate
Si
- 7/02/99
13
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FOR
CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of July, 1999, by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereina~er referred to as "CITY", and West Coast
Arborists, Inc., hereina~er referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled CITYWIDE TREE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereina~er, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for
CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for CITYWIDE TREE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\mainlain\trees\wcoastarboristscont/ajp
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
CITYVVIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTORagrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS
($150,000.00), the total amount of the base bid.
TERM: The term of the contract shall commence upon award by the City Council and
continue through June 30, 2002. The City reserves the option to extend the contract(s)
for an additional three (3) years. No price adjustments will occur during the first thirty-six
(36) months of this agreement. Upon request of the contractor and agreement by the
City, the item prices may be adjusted by the amount equal to the increase or decrease,
during the previous twelve (12) months, in the Riverside, San Bemardino ALL Urban
Consumers Index to determine the percentage of increase or decrease, the term
"previous twelve months" shall mean the twelve (12) month period ending June 30th Of
that year, or if not available, the prior month.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed thirty (30)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
o
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except
that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\ma~nlain\trees\wcoastarbor~stscont/ajp
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00-$500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\ma~nta~n\trees\wcoastarbor~stsconl/alp
10.
11.
12
13.
14.
15.
16.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in
violation of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project.
The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the
CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\rnainla~n\trees\wcoastarborlstsconl/alp
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation
concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district
court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation
between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 R \ma~ntain\trees\wcoaslarbonstscont/alp
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.
2200 E. Via Burton St.
Anaheim, CA 92806
(714) 991-1900
By:
Patrick O. Mahoney, President
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J, Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R:\maintain\trees\wcoastarborislsconValp
ITEM 15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manage~City Council
/')~/j)l William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
July 27, 1999
SUBJECT:
Authorize Change to Temporary Partial Street Closures for Bike Races from
July 31, 1999, to September 25, 1999. (Business Park Drive and Single
Oak Drive)
PREPARED BY:~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOM M ENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-67
WHICH AUTHORIZED PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF
BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE
TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25, 1999,
AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY 31, 1999,
TO CHANGE THE LATTER DATE TO SEPTEMBER 25, 1999, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR
THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS.
BACKGROUND: There have been several bicycle races held on the two more
appropriate closed courses in the industrial park areas of the City beginning in 1990. One of these
courses has been on the Rancho Califomia Business Park course (Business Park Drive and Single
Oak Drive). The other was on the Winchester Highland Business Park course (Ynez Road, Equity
Drive, and County Center Drive).
As these business/industrial parks have developed, them has been increased weekday use of these
areas. Both of these parks also have church tenants with principal uses on Sunday. Staff requires
as a condition of Special Event Permit issuance notification of all affected parties and businesses
when such events interfere with the normal flow of traffic.
The Rancho California Business Park course has been used several times as the prime bicycle
course with such event sponsors as Team Temecula/Rancho Cycling Club, and most recently the
Temecula Cycling Classic Stage Race in 1998.
r:~agdrpt~99~D713~busparkdrraces
This year, the two current applicants for use of the Rancho California Business Park Course
proposed to stage their races on Sunday, July 25, 1999, and Saturday, July 31, 1999. Subsequent
to the preparation of Resolution No. 99-67, the applicant for the Riverside Cycling Club requested
their event date change from July 31, 1999, to September 25, 1999.
Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways
under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other
instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events,
and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during
the temporary closing".
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards
and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way.
While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for
delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events.
The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary partial street closures
for the Riverside Cycling Club Race from July 31. 1999, to September 25, 1999. This authority
is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other
special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject
to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council.
These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California
Vehicular Code Section 21101.
A proposed race course and traffic controls are indicated on the attached diagram. Traffic Staff and
Police Department will review prior to issuance of these special event permits. All required signs and
devices shall be provided by the sponsors/permittees. The sponsors shall post insurance in
accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 91-96 which adopted standards for special
events on public streets, highways, sidewalks or public rights of way.
Some partial closures, as limiting lane widths for construction purposes or partial closures for "Block
Parties" on cul-de-sac streets only, have not been submitted for City Council action in order to
reduce the impact on City Council and staff time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. Any police services required for these events will be negotiated by the
Police Department and sponsors, and the sponsors shall be responsible for
such costs.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 99-
2. Resolution No. 99-67
3. Special Event Permit application and request for change of event date.
4. Proposed Course Layout.
r:'agdrpt~99~0713~busparkdrraces
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-67
WHICH AUTHORIZED TEMPORARY PARTIAL STREET
CLOSURES OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE
FOR THE TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY
25, 1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY
31, 1999, TO CHANGE THE LATTER DATE TO SEPTEMBER 25,
1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE
PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the partial closure of public streets
for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club races, for which such temporary
street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets
for the special event: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close portions of public streets for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club
races on July 25, 1999, and September 25, 1999, respectively: and,
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve
temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club
races, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be
reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling
Classic Stage Race on July 25, 1999, and the Riverside Cycling Club Race on September 25, 1999,
and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved
or denied approval by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk
r:~agdrpt~99~0713~busparkdrraces
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W, Jones, CMC
City Clerk
r:~agdrpt~99~0713~busparkdrraces
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 1996PECIAL
CITY
OF TEMECULA
EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION
CITy OFTEMECUL~'I'O BE HELD ON PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS,
ENGINEERING DEPARTML~)EWALKS' OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
.,.C;~'i..~l~u',jE~::;~_'~ ", t,C } \t b...,..--/'k'll--\ ,_ ~"1_~': !fiL''i_L.,'t,.,
"rCTh,'d C"...¢ 'E tp ~C
FEES O BE CHA~GE,D~BY PERMITTEE:
SOUND SYSTEMS - NUMBER AND AMPLIFICATION RANGE:
80
TYPE OL= GOODS/SERVICES TO BE SOLD/PROVIDED:
90
THE APPLICANT HEREBY STATES THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS ACCURATE UNDER PF,_.~ALTY OF PEI~URY. THE
APPLICANT AGREES TO FULLY COMPENSATE THE CITY OF TEMECUI~ FOR ANY DAIV~6E TO PUBLIC PROPERTY, AS WELL AS
TO C~ A~ OTHERWISE RESTORE THE ~T SITE TO THE CO~ffl0N I~ WHI6H · ~IS]E~ P~OR TO THE O0~B~0T 0F
~ APPLICANTlAG NT N~
FOR CITY STAFF USE ONLY:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT: $ PAID:
SPECIAL EVENT []
MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT []
MEET/CONFER WITH TRANSPORTATION DIVISION []
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED []
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIRED []
RECBPT #:
p wO 1 \forms\permits\specevnt, ~pp
092091
SENT BY: 3-12-98: 9:51A.',t: CITY OF TE~ECULA'~ Je~Sul:,: ;= ~"
RECF'
._ I V E D crn, oF Tm,:cu
-~UN _t 5 ~999SpECiAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION
C;~< OF TEMECULA TO BE HELD ON PUBIC ~RE~S, HIGHWAYS,
-._:~=~:~/ Z.',GINEER~NG DEpARTME~DEWALKS' OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
APP,CANT'S .A=S AND ADoR.s** ~'E~
NUMBER OF ANTIC~AT~ PARTICIPANTS:
3- PUBPOSEOF EVENT: ~L~-f C, L.(AJ~.q F_,J)~-~-TT''.
DATE, HOURS. PRECISE LOCATION OF EVENT:
FEESTOBECHARGEDBYPERMITTEE: ~ I~' 4trZo prcr~ p4-rz.~clpk~.~l'
e
TYPE & NATURE OF VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, ETC.:
~1 cycling.
7. SOUND SYSTEMS - NUMBER AND AMPLIFICATION RANGE: '
80
TYPE OF GOODS/SERVICES TO BE SOLD/PROVIDED:
90 VENDORS/NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS:
100 SECURITY PLAN FOR EVENT:
THE APPLICANT HEREBY STATES THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS ACCURATE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. THE
APPUCANT AGREES TO FULLY COMPENSATE THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR ANY DAMAGE TO PUBUC PROPERTY. AS WELL AS
TO CLEAN AND OTHERWISE RESTORE THE EVENT SITE TO THE CON~_~_,~ED PRIOR TO THE CONDUCT OF
THE WENT.
PRINT APPUCANTIAGENT NAME APeLICANT/AGENT SIGNATURE AND DATE
1. APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT: ' / PAID: RI3CEIPTI: 5/'q//l
~, INIU~NCE CBTIF~ATE REQUIRED D
~k~C~]~Qk~~FFIC STUDY R~QUIRED Q p~1%fom~emteXep.evet,~ 092091
'FOR CITY STAFF USE ONLY:
I Carrera Promotions International
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
PO Box 9033
Temecula, Ca. 92589
Attention: Albert K. Crisp Permit Engineer
Friday, June 11, 1999
Dear Mr. Crisp:
Enclosed is the special event application with applicable fee's and our proposal for
the Temecula Cycling Classic event to held July 25, 1999. We have applied for
permits with the District Representative of the United States Cycling Federation.
Liability insurance certificates in the name of The City of Temecula will issue by
the United States Cycling Federation (USCF). Copy will be sent to your office prior
to the event. Course marshals and Traffic control signage to be provided by our
organization.
Event format:
· 1.3 mile course utilizing Business Park Dr. and Single Oak Dr.
See attached
course map.
One group of riders competing on the course at one time.
All parking and registration will be held at the City of Temecula parking area.
5tart time 11:00 AM, Approximate finish time 5:30 PM
If you have any questions or concerns, please call as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation in advance.
Sincerely,
~era Pr~nal
Ben Cardenos
Event promoter
ENGINEERING SKETCH PAD
EPE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
PROJECT NAME T"rc~F__,~,,J,}~Iv- C,VCI,,II~
DESIGNED FOR
DESIGNED BY
BUDGETARY PRICE FOI~ DESIGN SHOWN BELOW $
DATE
RESOLUTION NO. 99-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY
PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND
SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC
STAGE RACE ON JULY 25, '1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE
CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY 31, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THESE
SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the partial closure of public streets
for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club races, for which such
temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use
those streets for the special event: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close portions of public streets for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling Club
races on July 25, 1999, and July 31, 1999, respectively: and,
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve
temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling Classic Stage and Riverside Cycling
Club races, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall
be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary partial street closures for the Temecula Cycling
Classic Stage Race on July 25, 1999, and the Riverside Cycling Club Race on July 31, 1999, and
and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved
or denied approval by the City Council.
R:Resos\99-67 1
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 13th day of July 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 99-67 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of July 1999, by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:Resos\99-67 2
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC~,~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27,1999
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21821 ( Northwesterly of Via Norte
at Kahwea Road)
PREPARED BY: ~
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT the public street and water improvements in Tract No 21821,
2. AUTHORIZE reduction in Faithful Performance security to the warranty level, initiation of the
one-year warranty period, and release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation security.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND: On July 2, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 21821, and entered
into subdivision agreements with:
Bedford Development Co. (c/o Mesa Homes)
for the improvement of street and drainage, installation of water systems, and subdivision
monumentation, and traffic signalization mitigation fees. Accompanying the subdivision agreements
were Instruments of Credit issued by Butterfield Financial Corporation as follows:
1. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $56,500 ($42,000, and $14,500, for street and drainage,
and water system, respectively) to cover faithful performance.
2. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $28,250 ($21,000 and $7,250, for street and drainage,
and water system, respectively) to cover labor and materials.
3. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $3,500 to cover subdivision monumentation.
4. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $750.00 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees.
\~TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PW~AGDRPT\99\0727\TR21821.ACCEPT.DOC
Bedford Development Co. subsequently sold the project to:
Cleveland Investment Co., Inc. and Temecula Investment Co., Inc.
28465 Front Street, Suite 321
Temecula, CA 92590
The new developer submitted replacement agreements and security for the contractual work which
were approved and accepted by the City Council on January 14, 1997.. The substituted security is
a Letter of Credit issued by Fallbrook National Bank as follows:
Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. 96-062 in the total amount of $89,000.
The stated amount is sufficient to meet the obligation for Faithful Performance of $56,500,
($42,000 and $14,500, for street and drainage, and water system, respectively); Labor and Material
of $28,250 ($21,000 and $7,250, for street and drainage, and sewer system, respectively);
Subdivision Monumentation of $3,500; and Traffic Signalization Mitigation of $750.00.
Staff has reviewed and approved the public improvements and Rancho California Water District has
accepted the water system. Therefore Staff recommends acceptance of the public improvements,
initiation of the one-year warranty period, and reduction in the faithful performance podion of the
posted security to the amount set forth below.
Staff also recommends release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation podion of the posted security.
The present process of collecting fees for this purpose was authorized under the Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee structure as adopted by Ordinance No. 97-14. The fee is taken at building
permit issuance on a square footage basis rather than the per gross acreage basis which was the
basis for the Traffic Signalization Mitigation security on file. Release of this podion of the posted
security reduces the residual amount by $750.00.
It is therefore recommended that the posted security be reduced to the following amount at this time:
Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. 96-062 in the reduced amount of $36,900.
(Faithful Performance warranty of $5,650, Labor and Materials of $28,250, and Subdivision
Monumentation of $3,000)
The Subdivision Monumentation is under review by Staff and will be recommended for acceptance
and release of that podion of the posted security to the City Council when appropriate.
The Labor and Materials podion of the posted security will be retained for the contractual six-month
lien period which follows City Council acceptance of the public improvements.
One public street within this tract is being accepted into the City-Maintained Street System by City
Council Resolution No. 99- at this time. The street to be accepted is Calle Fuente. Podions of
Via Node, and Calle Fiesta are within the tract boundary but were previously within the County
Maintained-Road System at the time of City incorporation and became pad of the City-Maintained
Street System by succession on December 1, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT: Location Map
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PWXAGDRPT\99\0727\TR21821.ACCEPT.DOC
RANCHC) ~
Zgo
Tract No. ?-1821
Location Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY A'FrORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: .t,j.~TJWilliam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: July 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System within
Tract No. 21821. (Northwesterly of Via Node at Kahwea Road))
PREPARED BY: i~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
~f~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET INTO THE
CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21821)
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract No. 21821 on July 2,1991, and entered into
Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, and water system improvements, and subdivision
monumentation with Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation.
On July 27, 1999, the City Council accepted the public improvements for this tract.
The public street now being accepted by this action is Calle Fuente. Other streets within this tract
include podions of Calle Fiesta and Via Node which were both pad of the County-Maintained Road
System prior to City incorporation and became a podion of the City-Maintained Street System on
December 1, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8
years.
Resolution No. 99- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:',agdrpt',99M:)727~tr21821 .sts
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET INTO THE
CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21821 )
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication of
certain lots for street and public utility purposes made by Bedford Development Company, a
California Corporation, with the recordation of Tract Map No. 21821: and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 21821 on July
27, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street offered to and accepted by the
City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
r:~agdrptLq9~)727~tr21821 .sts
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
r:~agdrptLq9~0727~tr21821 .sts
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 99-
Accepting the public street offered to and accepted by the City of
Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 21821, and accepting
subject public street into the City-Maintained Street System as
described below:
That lot described as Lot "C", as shown on Tract Map No. 21821,
filed 12 July 1991, in Book 233 of Maps, Pgs 58-61 Incl., further
described as follows:
Lot "A"*
Lot "B"*
Lot "C"
Portion of Calle Fiesta
Portion of Via Norte
Calle Fuente
* Streets included in the County Maintained-Road System prior
to City incorporation. These became part of the City-
Maintained Street System by succession on December 1, 1989.
r:%agdrpt~99%0727%tr21821 .sts
EXHIBIT "B" FOR RESOLUTION NO. 99-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
$_~ ~m~ ~ fs~.~/,~7.
273
~ ---
-, ,X ~/~.~ ~/~oi~t Site
~ ~ ~,,,
°~l ~ 275
_ ~ ~ N,x '-,,
2.83
LEGEND
290
289
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
ITEM 18
APPROVAL ,
CITY ATTORNEY '~E~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City ManagedCity Council
/)~j,~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
SUBJECT:
Substitute Agreements and Securities in Tract No. 24188-1 (Northwesterly
of intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at De Podola Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
/~'f~'Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement and Subdivision Monument Agreements,
and Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities
in Tract No. 24188-1.
AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation Securities on file.
DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developer and sureties.
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 24188-1 on July 13, 1999, and
entered into subdivision agreements with:
Newland Communities, LLC
9404 Genesee Avenue, Suite 230
La Jolla, CA 92037
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of water and sewer systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were the following securities
as posted by The American Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. 111 4167 5220 in the amount of $631,000 ($401,000, $108,000, and $122,500,
respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, water, and sewer
improvements.
Bond No. 222 4167 5220 in the amount of $316,000 ($200,500, $54,000, and $61,500,
respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, water, and sewer
improvements.
3. Bond No. 111 4167 5238 in the amount of $20,500 to cover subdivision monumentation.
r:~agdrpt~99~713~tr24185-2.subagmt
Newland Communities, LLC, has sold this project to the following developer:
Buie Careyes, LLC
11260 El Cam·no Real, #200
San Diego, CA 92101
The new developer has submitted replacement agreements and securities for the contractual
work. The substituted securities are bonds posted by Insurance Company of the West as
follows:
Bond No. 156 75 45 in the amount of $631,500 to cover streets and drainage, and water
and sewer improvements for faithful performance.
Bond No. 156 75 45 in the amount of $316,000 to cover streets and drainage, and water
and sewer improvements for labor and materials.
3. Bond No. 156 75 46 in the amount of $20,500 to cover subdivision monumentat·on
The affected public streets, although not completed or accepted are Fermo Court, Verona Court,
Naples Court, Messina Street, and portions of Jerez Lane, and Sunny Meadows Drive. The portion
of Butterfield Stage Road within the tract boundary is already part of the City-Maintained Street
System
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Subdivision Agreements (On file)
3. Surety Bonds (On file)
r:~agdrptLq9~0713~tr24185-2,subagmt
TR. NO. 24188-1
,JECT
SITE
D/EGO
VICINITY MAP
,
'
,
I
,/6
/r ,/,
', ,a / ,,,~/.
t->
t£.
Tract No. 24188-1
Location Ma-~
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
MJ,,~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
First Street Bridge Project, Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an agreement in the amount of $80,540
with Tom Dodson & Associates to monitor the environmental impacts associated with the
construction of the First Street Bridge, Project No, PW95-08 and, authorize the Mayor to execute this
agreement.
BACKGROUND: The Department of Fish &Game and Army Corps. of Engineers had
specified certain "stream alteration" conditions associated with the construction of First Street Bridge.
Tom Dodson & Associates who had processed the applications and had obtained the required
permits from said regulatory agencies, has been selected to conduct the required construction
monitoring and post construction restoration activities. Monitoring would have to begin approximately
three (3) weeks prior to start of construction, in compliance with the conditions, and continue for five
(5) years.
This contract agreement is presented to the City of Temecula City Council for approval pursuant to
the Cooperative Agreement approved on March 17, 1998 between the City of Temecula and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of First Street Bridge.
FISCAL IMPACT: This Project is funded by Redevelopment Agency and Capital Project Reserve
funds. Adequate funds are available for this agreement in Account No. 280-199~807-5804.
ATTACHMENTS: Agreement
R:~AGDRPT~99\0727\FIRSTSTREETAGRMT.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
FIRST STREET BRIDGE PROJECT
PROJECT NO. PW95-08
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27, 1999, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Tom Dodson & Associates, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than July 27,
2005, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged
in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Eighty Thousand Five
Hundred Fourty Dollars and Zero Cents {$80,540.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give wdtten
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
r:'cip~orojects~w95~pw95-08~odsonagrmt/ajp
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days
pdor written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work
under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a
portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided
that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this
Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by wdtten notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the dght,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without furlher
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be cleady identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the dght to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall
allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement.
Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3)
years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing
the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the
Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall
2
r:~cip~projects~pw95~pw95-08'dodsonagrmt/ajp
make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer
software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other
than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and
all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness
fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain
or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property
arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related
to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06
92 covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). If the Consultant
owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General
Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employers Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
General Liability: (City note: I million is minimum amount
required. This amount may need to be increased based on the
service and/or project. Please consult the Risk Manager and
notify Purchasing prior to completing this section - notice in
parenthesis should not appear in original document) $1,000,000
per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a
general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit
shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate
limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
r:~cip~rojects~pw95~pw95-08~odsonagrrnt/ajp
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employers Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Professional Liability coverage:: (City note: 2 million is minimum
amount required. This amount may need to be increased based
on the service and/or project. Please consult the Risk Manager
and notify Purchasing pr/orto completing this section - notice in
parenthesis should not appear in original document) Two million
($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be pdmary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurers liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
r:~cip~projects~pw95~w95-08~dodsonagrmt/ajp
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Covera.qe. Consultant shall fumish the City with odginal
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The
City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of
the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, headng or similar
5
r:~cip~projects~ow95~pw95-08~dodsonagrmtJajp
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity
to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's dght to
review any such response does not imply or mean the dght by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
Tom Dodson & Associates
2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92405
Attention: Tom Dodson
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only
Tom Dodson shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Tom Dodson may use
assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Tom Dodson from
Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the City shall have the option to
immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period, Upon
termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services
performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing
between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attomey fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
r:~cip~projects~pw95~pw95-08~lodsonagrmt/ajp
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written,
CITY OF TEMECULA
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Tom Dodson & Associates
2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92405
(909) 882-3612
By: Tom Dodson
Title: President
r:~cip~projects~ow95~w95-O8~odsonagrmt/ajp
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
r:%cip~orojects~ow95'q:wv95-O8%dodsonagrmt/ajp
TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
2150 N. ARROWHEAD AVENUE
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92405
TEL (909) 882-3612 · FAX (909) 882-7015
E-MAIL tda@empirenet.com
June 29, 1999
City of Temecula
Attn: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Attar,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide a cost proposal to reinstate the permits and to insure
environmental compliance for the construction of the First Street Bddge. The project involves
preparing the necessary paperwork and coordinating with the regulatory agencies for the reissuing
of the California Department of Fish and Game's 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and the
U.S Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit; conducting construction monitoring and
reporting for the Southwestern pond turtle, and coordinating and monitoring the subsequent
restoration of the construction site.
The following cost proposal has been broken down into four sections; 1) Permitting, 2)
Construction Monitoring, 3) Restoration and Mitigation Monitoring, and 4) attending meetings
upon request by the City of Temecula.
Task 1: Permits & Applications Coordination
TDA will prepare all necessary applications, identify potential mitigation, if necessary prepare an
Altematives Analysis, response to comments, and attend meetings. This task is very open ended
and dependant upon the biological resources as well as the regulatory process. Therefore the
estimated fee for this task ranges from $1,200.00 for a reissuance to $3,200 for a nationwide
permit, and estimated $10,987 for an individual permit. These costs include application fees. The
following are the anticipated tasks for each permit required.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's Section 404 Permit (Permit Fee: $100)
· Attend site visit with the Corps,
· Identify mitigation,
· Prepare Application (Alternatives Analysis and Conceptual Mitigation Plan),
· Prepare Response to Comments, and
· Attend meetings with the Corps.
Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 · Attend site visit (if necessary),
· Prepare Application,
· Coordinate the water quality questions, and
· Attend meetings with the Board.
(Application Fee: $500)
Temecula
June 29, 1999
Page 2
California Department of Fish and Game Streambed
Alteration Agreement
· Attend site visit,
· Prepare Application, and
· Provide Mitigation Plan for approval.
(Application Fee: $variable
between $600 and $1,200)
Task 2 Sensitive Habitat Awareness Training:
Typically, the resource agencies require training for the contractors and anybody working within
a sensitive biological resource such as a creek. Should this become a requirement during the
repermitting process, the following costs are proposed: This task has two parts, development of
the curriculum and conducting the classes. Development of the curriculum will require $137.50
to complete and $50.00 in materials. The training classes will require $270.00 per training class.
The class outline the conditions of the permits and the responsibility of the contractors while
working in a sensitive area. It also includes some information about the habitat and the species
that utilize it.
Task 3: Vegetation removal monitoring. and staking of sensitive areas:
A field review will be completed to determine the location of sensitive habitat and to. This area
will then be staked off and taped to prevent construction personnel from entering those areas.
This task will require $400.00 to complete.
Task 4: Pond Turtle Exclusion:
This task includes the setting up of pond turtle exclusion fencing and trapping any and all pond
turtle that may occur within the construction area and relocating them to areas outside the
exclusion fence. This process will cost $5,000.00 to complete
Task 5: Construction Monitoring.:
The pond turtle exclusion fences will need to be monitored approximately 3 time a week provided
excessive vandalism does not occur. Therefore, this task is expected to cost $1,100.00 per week.
Because I do not know how long the construction will continue, it is impossible to estimate a total
amount. Also, we may find the fences are not requiring as much maintenance as anticipated, and
the per week cost may be reduced.
Task 6: Monitoring of the restoration activities:
Once installed, the restoration outlined in the mitigation for the regulatory permits will need to be
monitored. Subsequent to the monitoring, reports will be prepared which outline any remedial
measures that must be taken to insure success. These reports will be submitted to the regulatory
agencies.
The monitoring is scheduled for 5 years. During the first year the site will be monitored every 6
months, then once per year for the remaining years. The cost for this task will be $16,000.00 this
number includes 6 separate surveys including collection of field data, preparation of a report, and
coordination of proposed remedial measures with the City. This cost may be decreased if the
mitigation is deemed successful prior to the expected 5 years.
Temecula
June 29, 1999
Page 3
Task 7: Other Direct Costs.
Any other tasks not identified in this proposal such as attending meetings with the City or
Contractors, will be billed on a Time and Materials basis at the following rates:
TDA Principal
Regulatory Specialist
Ecologist
Biologist 1
Mileage
$100.00/hour
$90.001hour
$ 68.751hour
$ 45.00/hour
$ 0.35/mile
Again thank you for asking Tom Dodson and Associates to assist you with this project and should
you have any questions or comments, please call. If you find this proposal acceptable, please sign
in the space provided below and return the letter to this office. You may approve only a portion
of these tasks by circling and initialing the accepted tasks, then signing the bottom of this proposal.
Sincerely,
Lisa Kegarice
Regulatory Specialist/Ecologist
Authorization To Proceed
Name/Title Date
ITEM 20
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
/j-,Z/(William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
July 27, 1999
SUBJECT:
Renewal of Annual Street Striping Contract for FY99-00
Project No. PW97-28
PREPARED BY:
Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the extension of the Street Striping Contract with Pacific Striping, Inc. of
Whittier for Fiscal Year 1999-00, for a period of one (1) year beginning July 1, 1999, in
an amount of $150,000.00
,
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $15,000.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of December 16, 1997 the
Street Striping Contract for FY97-98, Project No. PW97-28 was awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder, Pacific Striping Inc., of Whittier. Pacific Striping, Inc., has performed
satisfactory work during the past year and has responded efficiently in all emergency situations.
During FY98-99, Pacific Striping Inc. provided striping services to the City for a total cost of
$115,916.00. The total cost of service was allocated as follows:
$85,000.00 For new and repainted striping approximately
$10,966.00 For sandblasting legends and striping approximately
$10,000.00 For the Blue Dot program to mark fire hydrant locations
$9,950.00.00 For various category 1 and 2 intersection restriping projects
The original Contract contains provisions that allows the Contract to be extended on a yearly
basis by mutual agreement of both parties for up to three (3) years by the prevailing
construction cost index. The proposed contract limit has been increased to $150,000.00 for
Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to cover the additional cost of maintaining new streets recently accepted
into the street system and to complete additional Category I and II intersection improvements.
R:\agdrpt\99\727/pw97-98ext/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are included in the FY1999-00 Budget for this contract
extension under Public Works Street Maintenance Division Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-
164-601-5410 and Traffic Division Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-602-5410 for the
contract of $150,000.00 and the contingency amount of $15,000.00 for a total contract amount
of $165,000.00.
ATTACHMENTS: Amendment
R:\agdrpt\99\727/pw97-98ext/ajp
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND
PACIFIC STRIPING, INC.
STREET STRIPING CONTRACT FOR FY97-98
PROJECT NO. PW97-28
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 27, 1999 by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation CCity") and Pacific Striping, Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the
mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
a. On December 16. 1997 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Contract
entitled "City of Tcmccula Contract for Street Striping Services" ("Contract").
b. The parties now desire to arecad thc Contract as set forth m this Amendment.
2. Scction 4 ofthc Contract is hcrcbv amcndcd to read as follows:
PAYMENT Compcnsation shall be for all ser~'iccs as described in this Amendment and shall
not cxceed Onc Hundrcd Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($150,000.00) and shall be paid
pursuant to Section 4 of the Contract.
3. Section 5 ofthe Contract is hcreby amended to read as Follows:
"TERM This Contract shall commence on December 16, 1997 and scrvices shall be extended
to the 30th day of Jnne, 2000.
4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other ternis and conditions of the
Contract shall remain in full force and effect.
R :\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-28\PACIFICAMEND# 1/ajp
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the panics hereto have caused this Contract to be executed the day and
year first above w~'itten.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approvcd As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson. Citv Attorney
CONTRACTOR
PACIFIC STRIPING, INC.
P.O. Box 1691
Whittier, CA 90609
(502) 945-7805
Scott Fisher. President
R:\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-28\PACIFICAMEND# 1/ajp
ITEM 21
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
· 'l~J-~illiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
Tract Map No. 23100-7, Located South of La Serena Way, East of Meadows
Parkway, West of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of Rancho California
Road in the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199
PREPARED BY: ~onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works lement M. Jimenez, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 23100-7 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3) Subdivision
Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and
Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23100-7 is located within Village B of the Margarita
Village Specific Plan No. 199. As part of Specific Plan No. 199, Tract Map No. 23100-7 is subject
to all Specific Plan Amendments and Agreements. The Margarita Village Specific Plan was originally
adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 26, 1986 through Resolution No.
86-355. Specific Plan Amendment No. I was approved by the Board of Supervisors on September
6, 1988 via Resolution No. 88-471. Amendment No. I affected Village B by slightly increasing the
densities within certain planning areas within this village. Margarita Village Specific Plan became
part of the City upon incorporation of the City of Temecula in 1989. City Council approved Specific
Plan Amendment No. 2 on March 26, 1996, Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 on October 7, 1997,
and Specific Plan Amendment No. 4 on January 27, 1998. The latter three amendments to the
specific plan had little effect on Village B.
November 8, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Standard Conditions of
Approval for Tentative Tract No. 23100. March 15, 1989, the Riverside County Planning
Commission filed Minor Change No. I to the Conditions of Approval. May 2, 1990, the Riverside
County Planning Commission filed Minor Change No. 2 to the Conditions of Approval. May 27, 1997
City Council approved Planning Application PA97-0030 which was an amendment and restatement
of Development Agreement No. 5 for portions of Tract 23100.
Final Tract Map No. 23100-7 is a twenty-seven (27) lot single family residential subdivision with two
open space lots. The tract is located south of La Serena Way, East of Meadows Parkway, West of
Butterfield Stage Road and within Planning Areas 8, 10, 11, 12 of Village B of the Margarita Village
Specific Plan. The site is currently vacant.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23100-7:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit.
r:~agdrpt~99~)525~tr23100-7,map
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 23100-7
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 23100-7
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Quimby Fees
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Paid
Paid
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
r:~agdrpt~99~O525~tr23100-7.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23100-7
IMPROVEMENTS
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
Monument
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
$ 191,000
$ 80,500
$ 78,000
$ 349,500
$ 6,100
DATE: July 27, 1999
MATERIAL
SECURITY
$
$
$
$
& LABOR
95,500
40,500
39,000
175,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0.00
$ Paid
$ 96,930.00
$ 128.00
$ 8.00
$ 1,290.00
$ 305.00
$ 1,731.00
$ 0.00
r:~agdrpt~99~0525'~r23100-7.map
PROJECT
SITE
DE
,/
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE.
NUMBER Or LETTERED LOTS: 2 LOTS
TRACT NO. 231OO-7
MAY CROUP JULY, 1998
SHEET 1 OF 7 SHEETS
~_Cg~.~D~RjS~SST_A__TDa_Dj!
NO,
T~.~rCT~'S ~
BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC.
A CALIFORNIA LIMIff~'D UABILITY COMPANY
NAME
MY COMMIS9OR EXRRES:
TAX
~ ~ (LC[N~ EXPIRES:
CI_TY_C~__R_K_'~ S~TA~'I~I~ENT
THE CITY CO4JNCIL Or ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STAI~ OF CALIfORNIA. BY ITS CITY CLERk,
SUSAN W. J(1NES, CMC. ~{ER~BY APPRO V[S 114[ TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS IHE GrERS Or
DECICATiON MADE NEREGN FOR PU~IC NOA0 AND PUB(,IC LI'rlLITY PIJ~0S~S, AND AS PART
SUSAN W. JONES, CMC
OTY CLERK. CITy OF I~MECULA
SOILS I~T
A PRELIMINARY SOILS REPOI~T WAS PR[PARED BY LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 51GNEO BY
SCHEDULE A: SEC. 29, T, TS, R,2W.
TRACT NO. 23100-7
MAY GROUP JULY, 1998
SHEET 2 OF 7 SHEETS
PROJICT
[[ ]] _
. MB ~1e/'31~,34 I
TRAC I' 2310f~6
TRACT NO. 231OO-7
MAY GROUP JULY. 1998
SCALE: f - 200'
PROCEDURE OF SURVEY
MB 24P/RI.82
SHEET 3 OF
TRACf
MB / -
2310%4
TRACT 23100-4
MB 24gA57~80
7 SHEETS
PARCE3. MAP 22,5~4
PMB 14 f/94-g8
d29. sf> 1112'02'07'fi IIF~.Orfi
23100-3
2~2/44~49
39
TRACT ""-
20RTg 38 /~,,
MB 1~/1~I~18 /
~t ~ TRACT \
~.3100-1
MB 2'14/~-H
27
2~ /
TRACT NO. 23100-7
MAY GROUP JULY. 1998
TRAC i' ,c:~3100-4 ~
t'llB 24P, 15'f~O
2o
27
SHEET NO. 5
COUT~T
15
I 1
o-oo'oYsj' 5
I0
PORTION OF PARCEL I
PARGEL MAP 22564
PMB 147/g4~[~8
L6 Nso"le'28"E(r) ,;9.9o'
C3 970,00' 0510'25" 87.59'
C4 1000.00' O0'Jo'to* 8.78'
C5 300. 00' tO~0'2g" 54. t5~
C6 #4&O0' 32'54'05' 84.9g'
\
\
SHEET 4 OF 7 SHEETS
40
8
43
42 TRACT 23100°8
MB 222/44-4g
PMCER
kBELAIR
3Q / 3~
5\,
Tr:{AC-F 28100-,3 '
MB 22214.4-/~,r} ~v/// /
.,,,, \ \
N
TRACT NO. 23100-7
MAY GROUP JULY, 1998
SCALE: 1' -
SHEET 5 OF 7 SHEETS
28
25
24
%
2
I
18
17
"",'2'
/
MB 24g/57~[i0
/
16
27
LOT
12
15
L4 NBg'41'OS*W 28.22'
L6 N77~6'O2'W 27.93'
L8 N77~6'O2~R) 6g.gB'
L13 NiT~5'JJ~R) 27.~'
C4 270.00' 0e'05'20' .$8. 12'
PORrION OF PAHG~:~L 1
PARCEL MAP 225fj,~,
F'Mf3 147/g4-,.98
FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTIS ~ EASEMENT
NOTES SEEi ~HEET NO. 2
SCALE: 1 · ~ 50'
11
Io
'fF{ACT 23'10£)¢3 ~,,
tVlB 222/44-'4[::) ',~
TRACT NO. 23100-7
MAY GROUP JULY, 1998
SHEET 6 OF 7 SHEETS
,N ~4E O~Y O~ ~UECULA SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETS
COUNTY (~' RIV[RSIDE. ~TA~ ~ CALIF~IA
TRACT NO. 23100-7
MAY CROUP JULY, 1998
SCALE: f
PORTION
22554
P,M,
L'~ N20?1'21'W tll. O0'
PORTION OF PARCEl,
~ANCEL MAP
P,tvl, 147104~01~
9 8
THAC;T 2~-I00-,3
MB 222/44-49
\ /
\
THAGT 20~7f~
t,/li~ 16,91!6-18
ITEM 22
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
Agreement for Professional Service with Robed Bein, William Frost &
Associates for I-15/SR-79 South Interchange Project Study Report (PSR)
PW96-05 and 115/Santiago Road New Connection Concept Analysis PW99-03
PREPARED BY:
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
Ward Maxwell, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve an agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates to provide
professional engineering services for the preparation of the I-15/SR-79 South Interchange
Project Study Report (PSR) and I-15/Santiago Road New Connection Concept Analysis for
an amount not to exceed $86,776.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
agreement.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount
of 10% of the contract or $8,677.60.
BACKGROUND: The City was in a prior contract with Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates to provide the 1-15/SR-79 South Interchange Project Study Report (PSR), but the
contract was put on hold due to conflicting traffic counts at the interchange. The City has now
completed the technical data required for the circulation element and therefore has traffic counts that
represent future traffic volume increases. Assessment District 159 (AD159) Improvements, currently
under construction, provides adequate capacity for the shod-to-medium range traffic demands.
Caltrans approval of this interim intersection configuration was contingent on the City evaluating
optimum interchange configuration to improve the build-out operating conditions to acceptable levels.
The other phase of this proposal is to provide a Santiago Road/115 Interchange Feasibility Study for
potential freeway access at the Santiago Road Overcrossing. Staff recommends including the
Santiago/l-15 feasibility study with the 1-15/SR-79 South Interchange PSR because of their close
proximity to each other.
FISCAL IMPACT: The 1-15/SR-79 South Interchange Project Study Report is funded by
Development Impact Fees, Street Improvements. Adequate funds are available for the subject
Project Study Repod for the agreement amount of $63,208.00 in Account No. 210-165-662-5802.
The Santiago Road/I 15 Interchange Feasibility Study is funded by Development Impact Fees, Public
Facilities and Street Improvements. Adequate funds are available for the subject feasibility study
for the agreement amount of $23,568.00 in Account No. 210-165-652-5802.
1
R:~AGDRPT%99\0727\SR79SAGRMT.DOC
ATTACHMENTS: Agreement
2
R:~AGDRPT~99~727~SR79SAGRMT.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
1-15/SR79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE, PROJECT STUDY REPORT
PROJECT NO. PW96-05
AND
1-15/SANTIAGO ROAD, NEW CONNECTION CONCEPT ANALYSIS
PROJECT NO. PW99-03
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27 1999, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates,
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than July 27,
2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set fodh in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged
in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Eighty Six Thousand Seven
Hundred Seventy Six Dollars and No Cents ($86,776.00) for the total term of the Agreement
unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
r:\cip~projects~pw96~pw96-O5~rbfagrmt/ajp
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work
under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a
portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided
that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this
Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fled and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall
allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement.
Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3)
years after receipt of final payment.
r:',cip~projects\pw96~w96-05\rbfagrmt/ajp
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other
than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and
all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attomey fees and expert witness
fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain
or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property
adsing out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related
to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06
92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant
owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General
Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
r:~cip~projects~pw96~w96-05~rbfagrmt/ajp
(2)
(s)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Professional Liability coverage:: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
r:\cip~rojects~pw96~w96-05\rbfagrmt/ajp
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Covera.qe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set fodh in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The
City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of
the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity
5
r:\cip~projects~pw96~pw96-05\rbfagrmt/ajp
to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to
review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
P.O. Box 57057
Irvine, California 92619-7057
Attention: Gary L. Warkentin
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only
Gary L. Warkentin, Vice President shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Gary
L. Warkentin may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services
under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure
of Gary L. Warkentin from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the
City shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close
of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of Califomia shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
r:~cip%projects%pw96~pw96-05~rbfagrmt/ajp
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Robed Bein, William Frost & Associates
P.O. Box 57057
Anaheim, CA 92619-7057
(949-472-3505
Gary L. Warkentin, Vice President
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
r:\cip~projects~pw96~pw96-05~rbfagrmt/ajp
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
r:\cip~projects~pw96~pw96-05~rbfagrmt/ajp
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
June 23,1999
JN10-032637
Mr. Amer Attar
Senior Engineer
CITY OF TEMECULA
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Subject:
1-15/SR-79 South Interchange Project Study Report (PSR) and
1-15/Santiago Road New Connection Concept Analysis
Dear Amer:
In accordance with your request, Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) is pleased
to submit this revised proposal to provide Professional Transportation Planning and
Engineering Services for circulation improvements in the City of Temecula. We have
identified two specific objectives in our proposed Work Program. The first objective is to
complete the Draft 1-15/SR-79 South PSR and obtain Caltrans and FHWA approval of future
interchange improvements. The second objective is to determine the potential benefits of a
new connection to 1-15 at the existing Santiago Road Overcrossing.
To accomplish these objectives we have structured our proposed Work Program in three
phases. Phase One will be a Traffic Operational Analysis of 1-15/SR-789 South for the design
year 2025 based upon the City of Temecula Traffic Model prepared by Wilbur Smith
Associates. This analysis will be prepared for two scenarios: with and without 1-15 ramp
connections to Santiago Road. Phase Two outlines the specific tasks that will be undertaken
to complete and obtain Caltrans approval of the SR-79 South/I-15 Interchange PSR. Phase
Three outlines the tasks that will be undertaken to conduct a feasibility assessment of potential
ramp connections at the Santiago Road/I-15 Overcrossing.
Professional Service Since 1944
14725 ALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE, CA 92618-2069 · P.O. BOX 57057, IRVINE, CA 92619-7057 · 949.472.3505 · FAX 949.472.8373
OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA AND NEVADA · WEB SITE: www. rbf.com
Mr. Amer Attar
June 23, 1999
Page 2
WORK PROGRAM
Phase One - Traffic Operational Analysis
1.1
Traffic Projections - New traffic projections will be prepared for the year 2025 by
Wilbur Smith Associates as a subconsultant to RBF. This information will include AM
and PM peak hour turning volumes for the year 2025 for the SR-79 South/I-15 ramp
intersections both with and without ramp connections at Santiago Road.
1.2
Traffic Operational Analysis - Based upon AM and PM peak hour traffic projections
for the year 2025, RBF will prepare new HCM intersection analysis for a fifth
alternative interchange improvement concept. This concept will eliminate the existing
southbound 1-15 off-ramp to SR-79 South. In addition, work in this task will include
preparation of new traffic exhibits for inclusion in the PSR. Based upon our June 17,
1999, meeting with Caltrans and FHWA, revised traffic operational analysis will not be
required for the previously rejected alternatives.
Phase Two - SR-79 South / 1-15 Project Study Report
2.1
Preliminary Interchange Geometry - A new alternative interchange concept
(Alternative 5) will be prepared assuming that the additional traffic analysis prepared
under Task 1.2 indicates that it will operate at an acceptable LOS, (LOS D or better).
The new alternative will illustrate potential changes to the proposed interchange
geometry including:
1. Revised cross section on SR-79
2. Revised cross section on Front Street
3. Revised southbound 1-15 auxiliary lane
4. Revised northbound 1-15 ramp geometrics
5. Revised Bridge Advance Planning Study
6. Revised Right of Way Analysis
The proposed geometric plan for the recommended interchange concept will be
submitted to the City and Caltrans for review and comments before proceeding with
preparation of the revised Project Study Report.
2.2
Preliminary Cost Estimate - A revised preliminary cost estimate will be prepared based
upon Alternative 5.
JN 10-032637
Mr. Amer Attar
June 23, 1999
Page 3
2.3
Draft Project Study Report - The Draft Project Study Report will be revised to include
a discussion of Alternative 5 and the new supporting traffic analysis. Previous Caltrans
comments on the Draft PSR which are still applicable will be incorporated in the
revised PSR. This task includes preparation and processing of Fact Sheets for
Deviations from Mandatory and Advisory Design Standards.
2.4
Circulate Draft PSR - The Draft PSR will be circulated for oversight review comments.
Caltrans will circulate internally for functional group review and comments. The PSR
will also be circulated to the PDT and other affected agencies.
2.5
Final PSR - RBF will provide project team coordination during the review and approval
process for the PSR. Comments will be addressed and revisions made as appropriate.
2.6
Modified Access Report - Prepare a Modified Access Report in accordance with
Caltrans Chapter 27, Article 5 of the Project Development Procedures Manual which
will include the following sections:
Consideration of Alternatives
Interchange Spacing
Safety and Operation Analysis
Connection to Public Road
Local Planning
Coordination with Development
The report will be prepared concurrently with the Final PSR and processed with Caltrans for
conceptual approval by FHWA.
2.7
Meeting Attendance - Attend six (6) meetings during the implementation of this phase
of the work program and provide consultation to the City.
2.8
Project Management - This task includes budget for overall project management,
liaison with affected agencies, PDT leadership and management, progress monitoring
and maintenance of project files.
· Agency Liaison
A number of agencies, organizations and consultants are involved in this project.
An important consideration is to assure liaison with the key players for the
project. RBF will lead the PDT's effort and interface with organizations and
other firms. A budget for meetings with City staff has been included in this task.
Meeting schedules will be combined to allow a single meeting for multiple
purposes.
JN 10-032637
Mr. Amer Attar
June 23, 1999
Page 4
Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings
RBF will be a member of and attend monthly meetings of the PDT. The PDT
will guide the study in accordance with the Caltrans Project Development
Procedures Manual. RBF will arrange meetings, provide discussion materials
and agendas and develop and distribute meeting notes.
Progress Reports
Monthly progress reports will be prepared to document progress on the project.
The report will consist of the following:
· Work accomplished during the reporting period
· Work anticipated during the next reporting period
· Issues
· Impacts
· Progress Schedule
2.9
Approved PSR - Obtain Caltrans approval for Final PSR with Caltrans and reproduce
copies of approved and signed PSR.
Phase 3 - Santiago Road/I-15 Interchange Feasibility Assessment
3.1
Base Data/Field Review - This task will include a reconnaissance of 1-15, existing
development and local circulation system in the vicinity of the 1-15/Santiago Road
Overcrossing. Photographs from the field reconnaissance will be assembled. Review
relevant sections of City's General Plan and recent Circulation Element update.
3.2
Base Mapping - Establish survey ground control for aerial photograph. Prepare aerial
photographic base map at an approximate scale of 1:1000 of the 1-15 Corridor from
Rancho California Road to SR-79 South.
3.3
Conceptual Engineering Studies - Conceptual Engineering Studies will be undertaken
which will primarily focus on the physical characteristics of the project area. The
constraints of the project site will be identified and located. The anticipated
engineering features, design footprint, and standards for two (2) interchange concepts
will be developed at a metric scale of 1:1000 based upon applicable Caltrans, City,
County, and AASHTO standards. These alternatives are anticipated to include a
median HOV ramp concept and a collector/distributor road diamond interchange
concept.
3.4
Technical Memorandum and Concept Presentation - Prepare a technical memorandum
which summarizes the opportunities and constraints associated with the interchange
concept prepared in Task 3.3. A rough order of magnitude construction cost estimate
will be prepared along with project development requirements, schedule and costs.
#
JN 10-032637
Mr. Amer Attar
June 23, 1999
Page 5
3.5
Meeting Attendance - RBF will attend up to four (4) meetings during Phase 3 of the
Work Program.
We look forward to working with you on this project and are optimistic about gaining Caltrans'
approval of the proposed 1-15/SR-79 South interchange improvements based upon the revised
traffic projections.
Thank you for providing us the opportunity to submit our proposal on this project. If you have
any questions regarding our proposed project approach or budget, please call me at (949) 855-
3625.
Sincerely,
Vice President
Transportation Planning
co:
Bill Hughes, City of Temecula
Ward Maxwell, City of Temecula
G:\GRPl\PDATA\32637XOFFICE\WPWINXPSRIet.wpd
JN 10-032637
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
r:~cip~projects~pw96~pw96-O5Vbfagrmt/ajp
<
ITEM 23
APPROVAE
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER _
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City ManagedCity Council
,,v,J~/~illiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Grant of Easement of Storm Drain Improvements for the
First Street Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST
STREET BRIDGE
BACKGROUND: The design of the First Street Bridge Extension is complete and it
has been determined that a drainage pipe must be installed along the northerly side of First
Street to collect and convey the runoff from the intersection of Front Street and First
Street/Santiago Road in order to discharge the runoff into Mumeta Creek.
The drainage structure will require that a small portion of the recently acquired Redevelopment
Agency property be used for drainage purposes. It is recommended that the easement be
accepted by the City Council and recorded to facilitate construction of the project.
FISCALIMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 99-
2. Grant of Easement
r:\agdrpt\99/0727/firststreetstorm .esmt/ajp
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST
STREET BRIDGE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The legal description for the easement is set forth and depicted in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto;
WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the grants of easement to construct and
maintain that portion of the First Street Bridge;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts Easement Deed for the storm drain improvements for the First Street Bridge,
attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", for the purposes stated therein.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
r:\agdrpt\99/0727/firststreetstorm.esmt/ajp
EXHIBIT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Fortner Property
Page 1 of 1
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. CITY OF TEMECULA, BEING THAT PORTION OF
PARCEL 1 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA93-0107, RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
334292 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1:
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, NORTH 45°29'22'' WEST 20.94 FEET TO
THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00
FEET. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF NON-TANGENT CURVE BEARS NORTH 47°50'18" WEST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.86 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24°51 "24" TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING THE CUSP OF A CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CUSP BEARS NORTH 64"34'07"
WEST:
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTELRY LINE AND SAID CURVE 29.14 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°23'32" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 224 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
A MAP ENTITLED "EXHIBIT !" IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: FIELD SURVEY BASED ON FIRST STREET WEST OF FRONT STREET BEARING
NORTH 44°30'26'' EAST PER PM 7674 (86/50-51).
NORRIS-REPKE, INC.
33055 VINO WAY
TEMECULA, CA 92591
JN 92-03/4
~.. '7No' C15446'~ ~
,,. .-7-- \~-. -,, . NORRIS, P.E. C15446
REFERENCE FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. REPORT, ORDER # 2034432, DATED JUNE 22, 1995.
September 23, 1996
A.P.N. 922-073o022
EXHi}IT
CU,RVEE ;'~OlUS LENGTH C:ELTA
:!; 55.00' 25.86' 24'51'24"
'}2 S0.00' 2'9.14' 55'25'32"
L!NEI Z'fRECTION ! DISTANCE
L1 IN-'5'29'22" 'vV l 20.94'
-_. ~PN c,_=8-073-088
t'
',,,
·
FIRST STREET
GRAPHIC SCALE ,AREA: 224 S.F. _- 10.0051 AC)
, 5,0 i ?0 '~
~1 E ("Prep~eci by f
( [.",' FEET ) ~ NC)R~IS--RtEPKF.INC.
OWNEF: 'NILL!AM E. FORTNER AND D ;°E~"~';'%;~='vZ'27 ...............
TEMECULA INVESTMENT CO, ~NC. :,/3 k d.N g2-OSj
DRAWN PCM
APP~. jPN
ORDEP ~ 5034487
A.PN. :22-072-088
PCL. 1, LLA PA93-0107
INST,ff 334292, D,R.
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
CITY DF TEMECULA
DATE 9-83-96
SCALE ~' = 50
BY NDRRIS-REPKE INC.
E:\sdskproj\e203\dwg\jpn[ds.dwg
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF TEMECULA
PER GOVERNMENT CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City ofTemecula - City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
P O Box 9033
Temecula CA 92589-9033
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P O Box 9033
Tem,ecula CA 92589-9033
EASEMENT DEED - DRAINAGE PURPOSES
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GRANTS to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for drainage
purposes, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula,
State of Califi3rnia, described as:
See Attached Exhibit 'A" tbr Complete Description
IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument
this clay of , 1999
Print Name and Title
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE}
On , before me the undersigned,
a Notary Pttblic in and for the State of California, personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be tile person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to tile within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed tile saute in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instam,cut
the person(s), or the entity t,pon behalf of which tile person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ITEM 24
ORDINANCE NO. 99-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP
CHANGE), AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING
THE ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL L1 (1 ACRE TO 2.5 ACRE NET LOT SIZE) TO
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 (1/2 ACRE TO 1 ACRE NET
LOT SIZE), ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ESTERO STREET AND ORMSBY ROAD, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 945-070-011
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ching G. Lee filed Planning Application No. PA97-0446 in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Duly noticed public hearings
have been conducted and closed by the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of
Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning laws of the State of
California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The change to the land use district as
recommended by PC Resolution No. 99-15 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission is
hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as
adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of
the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in effect
the zone as described in Planning Application No. PA97-0446 and as recommended by PC
Resolution No. 99-15.
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City
Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
posted in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its adoption.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was
prepared for this project which determined that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to
mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval. Any
potentially significant impacts will be mitigated.
Section 5. Posting. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a
certified copy of the full text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at
least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this
Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of
the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the
City Clerk.
R:ords\99-18 1
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 27th day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-18 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 27th day of July, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:ords\99-18 2
ITEM 25
ORDINANCE NO. 99-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (THE TEMECULA REGIONAL
CENTER), AMENDING SECTION IV.E.4., TO ALLOW A 21-
FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT MARQUEE, ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 910-130-052, -053 AND -054
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of
the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application is hereby
approved and ratified as follows:
4. Theaters and Special Event Facilities
Identification and program information for theaters and special event facilities
may be provided by theater monuments and/or marquee signs. These signs, if
provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displaying the name of the theater,
auditorium, hotel or special event facilities and, if desired, may also include a
changeable section accommodating program information. These signs may be
either attached directly to the building or erected as free-standing signs. These
signs shall not extend above the height of the predominant roofline of the building
if attached directly to the building. Freestanding theater marquee signs cannot
exceed a maximum of twenty one feet (21') in height. These signs may be
illuminated internally, however, the permanent portion must have an opaque
background, with only the message portion illuminated, and setup for changeable
letters.
Section 2. The City Council in making a Determination of Consistency with a project
for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified under the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Specific Plan
Amendment does not require further environmental analysis because pylon signage along
Winchester Road at a maximum height of 36 feet was considered and approved under the
Specific Plan.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the
Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Ords\99-19 1
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 27th day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 99-19 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the day of 27th of July, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ords\99-19 2
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM I
APPROVAL ~
CI
TY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
GENERAL MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM:
Herman Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: July 27, 1999
SUBJECT:
Completion and Acceptance of the Community Recreation Center Gym
Cooling System Project No. PW97-22CSD
PREPARED BY:/kJ. JWilliam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the construction of the Community
Recreation Center Gym Cooling System Project No. PW97-22CSD) as complete and direct the City
Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On Apdl 14, 1998, the Board of Directors awarded a contract for the
construction of the Community Recreation Center Gym Cooling System Project No. PW97-22CSD),
to 1st Mechanical, Inc. for $145,800.00. This project provided for the installation of air-conditioning,
and temperature control system for the CRC Gymnasium.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services. The construction retention for this project
will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $145,800.00. Contract Change
Order No. I was approved by the City Manager and Board of Directors in the amount amount of
$2,227.00 for a total contract amount of $148,027.00. This project was funded through Developer
Impact Fees- Public Facilities.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit
r:~agdrptLqg\0727~pw97-22csd.jcd
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to 1"t Mechanical, Inc. to perform the
following work of improvement:
Community Recreation Center Gym Project
Project No. PW97-22CSD
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted
by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on July 27, 1999. That upon
said contract the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company was surety for the bond given by the said
company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 97-
22CSD.
6. The street address of said property is: 30875 Rancho Vista Road
Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of July 1999.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty
of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of July 1999.
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
R:\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-19\completn.not/ajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW97-22CSD
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
GYMNASIUM COOLING SYSTEM'
This is to certify that 1 s'C Nechanical , (hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for
all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO.
PW97-22CSD, COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER GYMNASIUM COOLING SYSTEM, situated in
the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER GYMNASIUM COOLING SYSTEM
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
,'~n~
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
II
CONTRACTOR
RELEASE R-1
R:\CIP~PROJECTS~;x, N97~;N,197-22~ID-DOCS,'WPD
Bond No. 40012005448985
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW97-22CSD
COMMUNITY RECREA T/ON CENTER
GYMNASIUM COOLING SYSTEM
KNOW ALL PERSOISLS. BY THK_~E PRESENTS THAT:
let Mechanical, Inc., 10457 Roselie Street, Suite K, San Diego, CA 92121
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
Corporation
{fill/n whether a Corporation, Partnership or individualJ
, heroinafter called Principal, and
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 500 S. Kraemer Blvd., Suite 200, Brea CA 92821
NAME ,4NO ADDR~:SS OF SURETY
heroinafter called SURETY. are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA.
heroinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of Fourteen ~aousaod Five Euadrect
Eighty DOLLARS and NO CENTS
{$ 14.580t~)0 } in lawful money of the United StaTes. said sum being not less than
ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of
the Contract. for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors and as.signs. jointly and
severa!ly, firmly by these i~raaents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBUGATION is such treat whereas, the Principal entered into a certain
Contract with the OWNER. dated the 14th day of April ,1998 . a copy of which is
hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW97-22CSD,
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER GYMNASIUM COOLING SYSTEM.
WHEREAS, said Contrac~ provides that the Principal will furnish a bond ccnditioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER.
against all defects in workmansl~il3 and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on AuKust 3 . 1998 ..
NOW, THEREFORE. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if w/thin one year from
the date of aplarovai of the said Contract. the worl< done under the terms of said Contract shall
disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and tl~e carrying out of the terms' of said
Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder. then :his obligation
shall remain in full force anct virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void.
Signed and sealed this 14th day of May
· 19_99.
(Seal)
UNITFj} STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANT~ COMi~ANY
SURETY
By: L ~, c.~ t /, ~ ~ c,~' ~ --
~rgie Mini~
~Name)
Atto~ey-in-Fact
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson. City Attorney
1ST MECHANICAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL
By:
(Name)
(Title) "·
/' (Name)x
(Title)
MA;NTENANCE BOND M-2 R:~CrP'~RQ.ECT~il,~'31.2.:",BIO.COCS.wP~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Orange
CALIFORNIA
ALL-PURPOSE
A C KN O WLEDG E ME NT
On ~ay lz~, 1999 before me,
DATE
Leigh Christiansen, Hotary Pub]_ic
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
personally appeared, Hargie Miniurn
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/~.l¢ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thatMel/she/
they executed the same in Itli~/her//tl~)r/authorized capacity(ies), and that by ~tJner/~elit
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~
~' ' '2~OTARY PUBLIC SIGNATGRE ~. 'k
'~' ~ OPTIONAL INFORMATION
" ,.Sl'Paul
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
United States Fidelit)' and (;uarant> Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc.
Economy Fire & Casualty Company
Power of Attorney No. 20096 Certificate No.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws ot the State of New York. and that St.
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the
laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State ot Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters.
Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin. and that Economy Fire & Casualty Company is a corporation duly organized under the
laws of the State of Illinois d~erein collectively called the "Ct,npanies "~ and that the Compames do hereby make. constitute and appoint
Mark D. Iatarola, Robert L. Fix, Margie Minium, Glenn Arakaki, Christa K. Arakaki and Charles L. Day
of the City of Brea , state California . their true and lawfu Attorney s ~- n-F~ ct
each in their separate capacity if more than one ~s named above. to sign its name as surety to. and to execute. seal alld acknowledge any and all bonds. undertakings.
contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons. guaranteeing the
performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any acreins or proceedings allowed by law'.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed this 17th day or' March 1999
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
State o{ Mar,land
City of Baltimore
On this 17th day of
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc.
Economy Fire & Casualty Company
MICHAEL B, KEEGAN. Vice
MICHAEL R. MCKIBBEN. Assistant SecretaD,
March 1999 , beti>re me. the undersigned officer. personally appeared Michael B. Keegan and
Michael R. McKibben, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary.'. respectively. of Seaboard Surety Cotnpany. St. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Fidelity and
Guaranty Insurance Company· Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.. and Economy Fire & Casualty Co~npanv and that thcv, as such. helm, ;mthnriTod
ITEM
2
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
,~.Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
July 27, 1999
Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-00
PREPARED BY:
/'~Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors:
Award a twenty three (23) month contract to Self's Janitorial Service to provide
park and facility restroom maintenance services in the amount not to exceed
$38,880 for Fiscal Year 1999-00.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a
Request for Proposal (RFP) for Park Restroom Maintenance Services in April 1999. The TCSD
received six (6) proposals, which were evaluated to determine qualifications and to assess the
competitiveness of their pricing. Self's Janitorial Service was determined to be the lowest
qualified bidder for the required services. The contract will provide restroom maintenance
services for existing City maintained restrooms and will allow the addition of future sites as
they come on line during the term of the contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Self's Janitorial Service for FY 1999-00
is $38,880.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD and the Public Works Annual
Operating Budgets for FY 1999-00 in accounts:
190-180-999-5250
001-164-603-5250
Attachments: 1 )
2)
Agreement
Cost per Unit Comparison
R:\HARRINGK\AGENDA.RPT\SELFS JAN[ SERV-99-00 CONTRACT.DOC
Restroom Maintenance Contract
Request for Proposal Results
(Cost per Unit Comparison)
Self's Janitorial
A Woman's Touch
Custom Service Systems
Bechtel Property Management
L & G Property Maintenance
Barrera Janitorial
9210.00
9221.00
9290.00
9338.00
9576.33
9694.00
R:\HARRINGK\AGENDA.RPT\SELFS JANI SERV-99-00 CONTRACT. DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RESTROOM MAINTENANCE
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 27 ,1999, between the
Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("City") and Self's Janitorial
Service ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein,
the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on August 1, 1999, and shall
remain and continue in effect until June 30 ,2001, with two (2) one year renewals at the sole
option of the City, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual services performed. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and the schedule
of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Eighty Thousand Two Hundred
Ei.qhtV Dollars and No Cents ($ 80,280.00 ) for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty -five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the Board of Directors.
c. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees it shall give written
notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~SelPs Janitorial 6-99.doc 1
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion
of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of
this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall
pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that
the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this
Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractors failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor"s control, and without fault or negligence of the
Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor
with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales,
costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance
of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided
in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily
accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at
reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books
and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection
of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records,
together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt
of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor.
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Self's Janitorial 6-99.doc 2
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees,
or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur
or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Contractors negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the
performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its
agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06
92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor
owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General
Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California
and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees
while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation
insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration
that it has no employees.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance
or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the
general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
R:\HARRINGK~GREEMNT~Self's Janitorial 6o99.doc 3
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager,
either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed
operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the
Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the
Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the
scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees
or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state
that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior
written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given
to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall
not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMN'RSelf'S Janitorial 6-99.doc 4
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall
at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers,
employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of
Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any
manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to
incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement,
City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services
hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed
by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor
shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and
its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor
to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City's prior written
authorization. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property
located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary"
provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition,
request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order
or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with
respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation,
to represent Contractor and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor
agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to
discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, City's right to review any such response does
not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery
by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Self's Janitorial 6-99.doc 5
a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below
or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon
delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the
document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Contractor:
Self's Janitorial Service
332 W. 2"d Street
Perris, CA 92370
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual
services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in
writing between the City Council and the Contractor.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this
Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind
Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Se~fs Janitorial 6-99.doc 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero, President
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
R:\HARRINGK~GREEMNT~SelI's Janitorial 6-99.doc 7
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
SCOPE OF WORK
Lock all facilities between 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM
Clean and stock all facilities between the hours of 10:00PM and 6:00AM.
Record and submit daily maintenance activities, vandalism, and graffiti on Restroom
Maintenance Checklist (Exhibit E) form to the City's Maintenance Supervisor or other
designated person. Keep and provide records as required by City representative.
Provide all necessary equipment, tools, chemicals, supplies, etc. necessary to perform
specified work.
City to provide all paper products (toilet paper, seat covers, paper towels). Submit request
for products weekly.
Perform all activities in a safe manner per OSHA's requirements, utilizing all personal
safety items required to prevent accidents, illness or injury to maintenance personnel and
the public.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CLEANING AND STOCKING FACILITY
* Sweep restrooms and remove litter from interior and exterior of building (6' walkway
around restroom building).
* Empty interior trash containers and replace liners (washout containers and clean
receptacles).
* Scrub and sanitize toilets and lavatories.
* Wipe down all fixtures, removing water, dirt, stains and any other incongruous substance.
** Wash (hose out) floors. Squeegee excess water out of building and off of hardscape.
Remove any paper or other trash accumulated from this procedure.
* Remove dirt, stains, or other debris on wall, ceilings, and light fixtures.
* Stock all toilet paper, or other paper products. All dispenser to be filled daily.
* Remove minor graffiti from building interior. Record on report form both graffiti removed, as
well as graffiti that you were unable to remove.
*** Pressure wash floors al3d walls.
FREQUENCY:
* Items to be performed daily. (Monday through Sunday)
** Items to be performed Mondays and Fridays
*** Items to be performed monthly.
NOTE:
The specifications are minimum requirements for the maintenance of City restroom facilities. The
restrooms shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and sanitary condition on a daily basis. Some
situations may require additional work to be performed to insure the health and safety of the public.
No additional compensation will be given for such work. No unsafe condition shall be left without
notification of City's authorized representative.
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Self's Janitorial 6-99.doc 8
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
SITE
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Winchester Creek Park
Rancho California Sports Park (Rancho Vista fields)
Rancho California Sports Park (North/South Fields)
Rancho California Sports Park (Skate Park)
Paloma Del Sol Park
Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park
Pala Community Park
Margarita Community Park
6th Street Parking Lot
Temecula Elementary School Pool
PRICE PER PRICE PER
ADDRESS MONTH YEAR
41970 Moreno Road $210.00 $2,520.00
33654 De Portola Road $210.00 $2,520.00
39950 Margarita Road $210.00 $2,520.00
30875 Rancho Vista Rd $210.00 $2,520.00
42775 Margarita Road $210.00 $2,520.00
42569 Margarita Road $210.00 $2,520.00
32099 De Portola Road $210.00 $2,520.00
31465 Via Cordoba $210.00 $2,520.00
44900 Temecula Lane $210.00 $2,520.00
29119 Margarita Road $210.00 $2,520.00
41952 Front Street $210.00 $2,520.00
41951 Moraga Road $210.00 $2,520.00
TOTAL PRICE
$2,520.00 $30,240.00
ADDITIONAL SITES TO BE ADDED DURING
THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT
Temecula Duck Pond
Temecula Valley High School Restroom
Temeku Hills Sports Park (2 restrooms)
ADDRESS
28250 Rancho Calif. Rd.
31555 Rancho Vista Rd.
La Serena & Meadows
TOTAL PRICE
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
SCOPE OF WORK
Butterfield Stage Park
Maintain holding tank per manufacturer,
Clivus Multrum, Inc., see Exhibit D
PRICE PER PRICE PER
MONTH YEAR
$210.00 $2,520.00
$210.00 $2,520.00
$420.00 $5,040.00
$840,00 $10,080.00
PRICE PER PRICE PER
MONTH YEAR
$90.00 $1,080.00
TOTAL PRICE $3,450.00 $41,400.00
Payments shall be made monthly for actual services performed in the amount not to exceed:
$3,450.00
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Selrs Janitorial 6-99.doc 9
ITEM
3
· jauuew Alaw!~ e u! pjeNuoj 6U!AOLU s)oerojd
dID Jeqlo 6u!dee~ al!q~ 'au!lew!~ e uo Apn~s A~!l!q!seaJ aq~ 6u!~!padxa u! )s!sse II!N~ seeJe pauo!~uaw
a^oqe eq~ u! es!~Jadxe q~!~A LUJg e Jo uo!pales eq,L 's~oe[oJd dID 0~ Alalew!xoJdde 6u!aasJeAo
Al~ueJJno s! OSOJ_ eq~ 'uo!~!ppe ul 'suoo pue soJd IleJaAo eql jo uo!u!do )uepuadepu! us aAeq o~
lue~odw! s! ~! 'uos.uedwoo s!q~ jo esneoee '~J!~JaPO 'JVM q~.~ anu!~uoo plno~ suo!ssnos!p 'Apnls s!q~
lnoq6noJq/'elnoewa/Jo A~!O eq~ Aq pe~eJedo pue paionj~suoo ~jed s~ods e o~ '~J!~PepO 'JVM Aq
pesodojd se qons 'A)!l!oeJ pa~eJedo Ale~eA!Jd e ajedwoo plnOAA Apn~s eql ueq~ 'alq!seaJ pau!LuJa~ep
Jl 'arts aql ~e xaldwoo s~ods e jo ('o~e 'eouepueile 'puewep ~a~Jew '~soo 'e'!) A~!l!q!seaJ aq~
a~oldxe ~sJy II!N~ Apnls aq) leq~ paled!o!~ue ~elS 'suoseeJ leJaAas JoJ Apn~s AHl!q!seaJ e pnpuoo ol
sseooJd ~ s!ql q6nojq) papales eq LLUSJ leuo!ssepJd ~uepuedapu! us ~eq~ 6u!puawwooaJ s! J~e~S
· X~adojd xaldLuoO
s~odS ~sa~Aq~oN aq~ Is ~Jed s~ods e 6u!dolaAap Jo Al!l!q!seaJ eq~ 6u!u!Luja~ap passnos!p osle
I!ounoO A~!O aq,L 'xalduJoO s~odS sLueeJO en6eeq 6!8 aq~ Jo ~uaLudolaAep aq~ 6u!pje6aJ ~J!~JaPO
~o!~ 'JW q~!~A en6ole!p e uedo o~ ~e)s JoJ UO!~OLU e peAojdde I!ounoO A~!O eq~ LueJ6oJd ~UaLUeAOJdLUl
leHdeO aq~ 6u!pJe6aJ 6u!laaLu I!ounoO AID '666~ '6~ aunt aq~ ~V :ONRO~O)4OV8
'aa;;!wLuoo
-qns xaldLuoo spods e uo eAJes o~ sJo}oaJ!O Jo pJeo8 eql Jo sjaquJeLu (~) OAA; lu!oddV
· xelduJoo s~ods e jo ~ueLudolaAep aq~ JoJ Apn;s
A~!l!q!seaJ e JoJ suJjg pag!lenb o~ (~)J~) suo!leo~J!lenO Joj ~senba~ e Jo asealaJ aq~ aAoJddV
:sJo}oaJ!O Jo pJSO8 aq~ ~sql
:NOI/VON:!iNINO3::I~
seo!AJeS A)!unwwoO Jo Jo}oeJ!C] 'Je~Jed 'O ueu-ueH
:AS O::l~lVd:::ll:ld
:.l.O:ll'8flS
::I.LVO
:INO~-I
:O.L
± ~ ~I39VNVIAI AIIO
' 103~110 :IONVNId
~I~A~O~dAd%N~IOIIV AJ. IO
repayment issues, demographics, toudsm, and the overall economic impacts to the community. This
study will also address environmental impacts to include a site analysis that addresses geological
land issues, general plan, site drainage, and flood plain considerations.
In addition, the study will consider the overall recreational needs of the City related to the
development of the sports ball fields at City build out and on-going maintenance and operations
issues. The RFQ for the feasibility study is proposed to be mailed on July 29, 1999 with a retum date
of August 20, 1999.
Although the attached RFQ and process is recommended as an altemative, if the City Council does
not wish to explore the City operated facility and wishes to consider the Big League Dreams proposal
exclusively, staff would still recommend the City Council consider a consultant to perform the
feasibility study. Staff would then modify the verbiage in the attached RFQ before distributing it to
qualified firms.
The recommendation also requests that the Board of Directors appoint two (2) Board Members to
serve on a sub-committee to assist in the evaluation of Statement of Qualifications. The sub-
committee would also serve and assist at workshops during the design phase of the project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
for a sports complex.
$65,000 has been set aside in the CIP to perform the feasibility study
ATTACHMENTS:
- Request For Qualifications - Preparation of a Feasibility Study for
the design, construction, operation and maintenance of a Sports
Complex
\\TEMEC_FS201 ~DATA~DEPTS\CSD~IGLERG\REPORT\Sports Complex Study. BOD2.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR
QUALIFICATIONS
Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the design,
construction, operation and maintenance of a Sports
Complex
Submittal Date:
4:00 P.M.
August 20, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A
SPORTS COMPLEX
L PURPOSE
The City of Temecula Community Services District, hereinafter referred to as the "TCSD," is
requesting Statements of Qualifications from qualified firms experienced in the completion of
feasibility studies addressing the design, construction, operations and maintenance of sports
complexes. The City currently owns approximately 32 acres of undeveloped land that may be used
for a baseball/sot'tball and soccer complex. It is the TCSD's intent to select a qualified consulting firm
to thoroughly evaluate the following areas:
Economic Impacts The analysis will include an evaluation of a City regional park facility
versus a privately developed and operated sports complex on City property. The analysis of a private
venture should address the potential revenue stream to the City from such a partnership. The
economic impacts to be considered in both scenarios will include, but are not limited to the economic
viability, the effect on tourisrn, demographics, projected attendance, revenue generation versus cost,
land acquisition repayment, alcohol versus non-alcohol sales, a pay-for-play versus non pay-for-play
facility, need/benefit of a restaurant and/or sporting goods shop, and impacts to existing City
recreational programs.
Site Analysis and Environmental Impacts The study will need to explore all of the
opportunities and constraints of the proposed site, including but not limited to geological, land use,
general plan, specific plan, site drainage, seismic and flood plain considerations. These considerations
will include, but not be limited to, the costs to prepare the site for construction, ie: raising the site out
of the flood plain, roadway and utility needs, etc.. The study will also need to address the potential
impacts of the proposed recreational facility as it relates to all environmental considerations including
but not limited to traffic, noise, and lights.
Recreational Needs Analysis The feasibility study should consider the ultimate number of
baseball, sof~ball, and soccer fields needed by the City at build out. Consultant should address how
the proposed facility would impact current and future recreational needs in the City and market
demand. The study should also analyze the need for and benefits from other potential recreational
facilities that might be included as part of the complex.
Operational and Maintenance Alternatives The feasibility study should consider the
alternatives of the City operating the facility or entering into a public/private partnership with a
private firm to operate and maintain the facility.
R:XRUSE~ complex feasibility smdy.ffq.doc
Evaluation of Proposals The selected consultant would be expected to assist the City
in the review and evaluation of Statements of Qualifications submitted to the City by sports complex
developer/operators.
H. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Statements of Qualifications will be evaluated for completeness. Incomplete statements or failure to
address all items requested will result in disqualification from consideration.
· Qualifications of key personnel likely to be assigned to the project.
· Experience in providing sporting facilities feasibility study services.
· Experience in preparing economic impact analysis.
· Experience in analyzing public/private partnerships.
· Experience in site and environmental impact analysis.
· Experience in working with governmental agencies in the analysis of entrepreneurial ventures.
HI. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Firms who wish to be considered for this project must submit the following information:
· Firm name and year established.
· Business address and telephone number.
· Qualifications of key personnel to be assigned to the work in the form of a resume including
names, professional registrations, responsibilities, knowledge of large private and public
recreational sporting facilities, public/private partnerships, environmental concerns and
constraints, experience in preparing in-depth feasibility studies comparing alternative methods of
construction and operations, experience in analyzing operating revenue/cost projections and
experience in evaluating current and future community recreational needs.
· Client references which include at least two (2) governmental agencies for whom similar services
have been provided.
The submittal shall be signed by an authorized official of the consultant's firm.
The submittal shall be valid for a minimum of 90 days.
R:~.USEPIFP~r~ gomplcx feaibiiRy study.rfq. doc
IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
· The consultant's submittal, this RFQ, and all subsequent modifications to either document will be
included as appendices to the final contract.
· The consultant shall not assign, transfer, convey, or otherwise dispose of his contract or his rights,
rifle or interest in or to the same without previous written consent of the TCSD.
The consultant agrees to hold the TCSD harmless from any and all liability or loss resuking from
any suits, claims or actions brought against the TCSD, which result directly or indirectly from the
wrongful or negligent actions of the consukant in the performance of the contact.
At the time of execution of the contract, the consultant will be required to carry general liability,
automobile liability insurance including owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, and professional
liability insurance as described in Exhibit "A." Said insurance policies shall name the City as an
additional insured with respect to all activities arising out of the performance of the consultant's
services. Certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the required coverages shall be
provided upon execution of the contract. Such certificates shall afford the City thirty (30) days
written notice of cancellation or of a material change in coverage.
· Consultant is required to comply with all existing State and Federal labor laws.
V. GENERAL INFORMATION
· The TCSD will not reimburse firms for any costs associated with the preparation and
or/submission of this RFQ.
· This RFQ does not obligate the TCSD to accept or contract for any expressed or implied services.
· All information contained in the responses to this RFQ shall become public records upon award
of a contract to the successful firm; until such award, all responses shall remain confidential.
· The TCSD will negotiate with the firm determined to be the most qualified to provide the needed
services. The firm will be requested to submit a formal cost proposal for services at that time.
· The TCSD reserves the right to award contracts to one or more qualified firms and to distribute
work among the successful firms as best meets the needs of the TCSD.
The TCSD reserves the right to reject any or all submittals. The TCSD further reserves the right
to negotiate the specific requirements, scope of work, and compensation and to enter into a
contract for any or all of the phases of the project as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties.
· The terms and scope of the contract will be determined on the basis of professional negotiations
R:XRUSE~ complex feasibility study. rfq. doc
between the TCSD and the prospective consultant. If the TCSD and the prospective consultant
fail to reach a contractual agreement, the TCSD reserves the right to negotiate with any other
fmalist.
Please refer all questions regarding this Request for Qualifications to Herman D. Parker, Director
of Community Services or Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services at (909) 694-
6480.
Six (6) copies of the submittal must be received no later than 4:00 o.m. on
Ffidav, August 20, 1999 at:
Via U.S. Mail:
City of Temecula
Office of the City Clerk
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Courier Service and Walk-In Delivery:
City of Temecula
Office of the City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Please clearly mark the submittal package: "Statement of Qualifications for Feasibility
Study for the design, construction, and operation of a Sports Complex".
No amendments, additions, or alterations will be accepted after the submission deadline stated above.
Proposals and documents submitted shall become the property of the City of Temecula.
SELECTION CRITERIA
The TCSD plans to consider each ~rm's experience with similar projects, the qualifications and
number of staff available for the assignment, the experience of outside consultants and associates to
be retained, the ~rm's willingness and demonstrated ability to meet deadlines, the firm's demonstrated
ability to complete projects on or under budget, and other areas pertinent to the project.
A Selection Committee will review the proposals submitted and request an interview with the top-
ranked firm or firms. Following interviews, the TCSD reserves the right to negotiate terms and
scope of work with the highest ranked firm. If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the TCSD
reserves the fight to negotiate with any other finalist.
R:XRUSEI}~'~a~Ix~ oompl~x feasibility study. rfq. do~
CITY OF TEMECULA
INSURANCE PROVISIONS
EXHIBIT A
Consultant shall maintain in full force, during the term of the service contract, limits of insurance, no
less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and
property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability: Worker's Compensation as required by the
Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
It is the Consultant's responsibility to notify the City if there are any changes in insurance
provisions that would impact the above requirements.
Insurance carrier(s) shall be admitted to do business in the State of California and shall have
a Best rating of no less than A:VII.
R:XRUSE~ c~plex feasibility smdy.ffq. doc
ITEM
4
APPROVA /
CiTY ATTORNEY ~'~)~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
t~--L-~)Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
July 27, 1999
Children's Museum Request for Qualifications and Sub-Committee
PREPARED BY:
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Approve the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to qualified firms for a feasibility study
regarding the development of a local children's museum.
Appoint two (2) members of the Board of Directors to serve on a children's museum sub-
committee.
BACKGROUND: At the July 13, 1999, City Council meeting the City Council considered
and approved the 5 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 1999-2004. The CIP
program included a project for the development of a children's museum. Staff has included funding in
this project for a feasibility study, design of the fadlity, design of exhibits and construction. The selection
of a qualified professional firm with expertise in the areas mentioned, will greatly assist staff in
continuing to move other CIP projects forward in a timely manner.
Attached for your review and approval is a Request For Qualifications that staff proposes to mail to
qualified firms requesting a Statement of Qualification to prepare a feasibility study regarding the
development of a children's museum. The study will address the appropriate location and size of a
children's museum, whether there is a need for a children's museum in the community, and the
economic impads of such a facility. The study will also analyze ongoing maintenance and operation of
the fadlity, and whether operations should be handled by the City or a non-profit organization.
Staff is requesting that the Board of Directors also appoint two members to serve on a sub-committee
that will review Statements of Qualifications and partialpate in design workshops once the design
process begins.
It would be staff's intent to distribute by mail the RFQ by July 29, 1999, and due to the City by Friday,
August 20, 1999.
R:~ZIGLERG~REPOR~Children's Museum Study. BOD.doc
FISCAL IMPACT:
$25,000 has been set aside in the CIP to perform the feasibility study.
ATTACHEMENT:
Request for Qualifications - Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the
development of a local Children's Museum
R:~IGLERG~REPOR'r~Children's Museum Study. BOD.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR
QUALIFICATIONS
Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the development of a
local Children's Museum
Submittal Date:
4:00 P.M.
August 20, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
FOR CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FEASIBILITY STUDY
L PURPOSE
The City of Temecula Community Services District, hereinafter referred to as the "TCSD," is
requesting Statements of Qualifications from qualified finns experienced in the completion of
feasibility studies addressing the economic factors, location, size, and operations and maintenance of
children's museum and/or similar facilities. The City is currently nearing the completion of a
historical museum in its Old Town area. The site upon which the facility is located provides for an
additional building wing or another freestanding facility. It is the TCSD's intent to select a qualified
consulting firm to thoroughly evaluate the following areas:
Location and Size The analysis will include an evaluation of all available potential
locations. The study should take into account any potential compliments the historical and children' s
museums might lend to one another and any potential economies of scale for operations and
maintenance. It should address the optimum size and type of exhibits for a children's museum for
a community of the City' s size and ultimate population at build out.
Economic Impacts The analysis will include an evaluation of a City operated facility versus
a City-owned facility operated by a private non-profit organization. This should include an analysis
of operating cost/revenue projections. The analysis of a private venture should address any potential
revenue stream or operating subsidy to the City from such a partnership. The report should also
consider the effects of the facility on local tourism.
Cultural Needs Analysis The feasibility study should address how the proposed facility
would best compliment current and future cultural awareness as outlined in our Cultural Arts Master
Plan, and educational and recreational needs in the City.
IL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Statements of Qualifications will be evaluated for completeness. Incomplete statements or failure to
address all items requested will result in disqualification from consideration.
· Qualifications of key personnel likely to be assigned to the project.
· Experience in providing feasibility study services for similar projects.
· Experience in preparing economic impact analyses.
R:XRUSEP~.FPXchildren's museum feasibility smdy. ffq2.doe
· Experience in analyzing public/private partnerships.
· Experience in site and sizing analysis.
STATEMENT OF QUALWICATIONS
Firms who wish to be considered for this project must submit the following information:
· Firm name and year established.
· Business address and telephone number.
Qualifications of key personnel to be assigned to the work in the form of a resume including
names, professional registrations, responsibilities, knowledge of children's museums or similar
facilities, their operations, impacts on tourism, cultural awareness, and educational and
recreational needs, experience in preparing feasibility studies comparing alternative methods of
operations and maintenance, experience in analyzing operating revenue/cost projections and
experience in evaluating current and future community recreational and cultural needs.
· Client references which include at least two (2) governmental agencies for whom similar services
have been provided.
· The submittal shall be signed by an authorized official of the consultant's firm.
· The submittal shall be valid for a minimum of 90 days.
IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
· The consultant's submittal, this RFQ, and all subsequent modifications to either document will be
included as appendices to the final contract.
· The consultant shall not assign, transfer, convey, or otherwise dispose of his contract or his rights,
title or interest in or to the same without previous written consent of the TCSD.
The consultant agrees to hold the TCSD and City harmless from any and all liability or loss
resulting from any suits, claims or actions brought against the TCSD and City, which result
directly or indirectly from the wrongful or negligent actions of the consultant in the performance
of the contact.
At the time of execution of the contract, the consultant will be required to carry general liability,
automobile liability insurance including owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, and professional
liability insurance as described in Exhibit "A." Said insurance policies shall name the TCSD and
RARUSEPLRFI~hildreffs museum feasibility study.rfq2.doe
City as an additional insured with respect to all activities arising out of the performance of the
consultant's services. Certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the required
coverages shall be provided upon execution of the contract. Such certificates shall afford the
TCSD and City thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation or of a material change in coverage.
· Consultant is required to comply with all existing State and Federal labor laws.
V. GENERAL INFORMATION
· The TCSD will not reimburse firms for any costs associated with the preparation and
or/submission of this RFQ.
· This RFQ does not obligate the TCSD to accept or contract for any expressed or implied services.
· All information contained in the responses to this RFQ shall become public records upon award
of a contract to the successful firm; until such award, all responses shall remain confidential.
· The TCSD will negotiate with the firm determined to be the most qualified to provide the needed
services. The firm will be requested to submit a formal cost proposal for services at that time.
· The TCSD reserves the right to award contracts to one or more qualified firms and to distribute
work among the successful firms as best meets the needs of the TCSD.
The TCSD reserves the right to reject any or all submittals. The TCSD further reserves the right
to negotiate the specific requirements, scope of work, and compensation and to enter into a
contract for any or all of the phases of the project as may be mutually agreed upon by the paxties.
The terms and scope of the contract will be determined on the basis of professional negotiations
between the TCSD and the prospective consultant. If the TCSD and the prospective consultant
fail to reach a contractual agreement, the TCSD reserves the right to negotiate with any other
finalist.
Please refer all questions regarding this Request for Qualifications to Herman D. Parker, Director
of Community Services or Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services at (909)
694-6480.
R:~RUSEPLRFPN~aild~en's museum feasibility study.ffq2.doc
Six (6) copies of the submittal must be received no later than 4:00 o.m. on
Friday, Aupust 20, 1999 at:
Via U.S. Mail:
City of Temecula
Office of the City Clerk
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Courier Service and Walk-In Delivery:
City of Temecula
Office of the City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Please clearly mark the submittal package: "Statement of Qualifications for Children's
Museum Feasibility Study".
No amendments, additions, or alterations will be accepted after the submission deadline stated above.
Proposals and documents submitted shall become the property of the City of Temecula.
SELECTION CRITERIA
The TCSD plans to consider each ~nn's experience with similar projects, the qualifications and
number of staff available for the assignment, the experience of outside consultants and associates to
be retained, the ~nn's willingness and demonstrated ability to meet deadlines, the ~rm's demonstrated
ability to complete projects on or under budget, and other areas pertinent to the project.
A Selection Committee will review the proposals submitted and request an interview with the top-
ranked firm or rims. Following interviews, the TCSD reserves the fight to negotiate terms and
scope of work with the highest ranked firm. If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the TCSD
reserves the right to negotiate with any other finalist.
R:XRUSE~ldren's museum feasibility study. rfq2.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
INSURANCE PROVISIONS
EXHIBIT A
Consultant shall maintain in full force, during the term of the service contract, limits of insurance, no
less than:
1.
,
,
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and
property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
Workers Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers Compensation as required by the
Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
accident.
Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
It is the Consultant's responsibility to notify the City if there are any changes in insurance
provisions that would impact the above requirements.
Insurance carrier(s) shall be admitted to do business in the State of California and shall have
a Best rating of no less than A:VII.
RARUSEPLRF~hildr~n's museum feasibility study.ffq2.doc
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
,,terman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
July 27, 1999
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY:
Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
On January 25, 1999, the Community Services Department released a Request for
Qualifications for architectural design services for the expansion of the Mary Phillips Senior
Center. The proposed expansion will include kitchen upgrades and a 2,500 to 3,000 square
foot enlargement of the building to include additional space for meetings and classes. At the
March meeting, the Community Services Commission appointed a Commissioner to work with
staff on the design for the expansion for this facility. The first design committee meeting was
be held in July of 1999. A senior community workshop will be held on August 3, 1999.
The City of Temecula Community Services Department brought forward to the TCSD Board of
Directors a Joint Use Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the
Temecula Valley High School Tennis Courts. The agreement was approved by the Board of
Education on August 18, 1998. The agreement provides for the lighting and maintenance of
eight tennis courts at Temecula Valley High School, by the City of Temecula, in exchange for
the use of the tennis courts in the City's overall parks and recreation program. This project is
currently under construction and should be complete by the end of August 1999.
The City Council awarded a construction contract to Terra Cal Construction for the Phase II
improvements to the Temecula Duck Pond. Construction of the improvements is complete and
the project is in the 90-day maintenance period. The project should be dedicated and re-opened
to the public in September of 1999. Improvements include stabilization of the pond edge,
walkways, landscape, irrigation, bandstand, restroom, parking facilities, and road improvements
to Ynez Road.
R:XZIGLERG~(DEPTRPT\9907.doc
1uly 22, 19~9
The City of Temecula Community Service Department's Annual 4th of July parade and Star-
Spangled fireworks show was held on July 4, 1999. This year's event was extremely
successful with approximately 15,000 in attendance at parade, and 18,000 in attendance at
the Sports Park.
The City of Temecula Community Services Department is currently offering the summer concert
series. Concerts are held once month at each, the CRC Amphitheater and the Gazebo at the
Sam Hicks Monument Park, during the months of July and August.
The maintenance division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation
facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings or facilities. The maintenance division
is currently overseeing the 90 maintenance period of the Temecula Duck Pond.
On Thursday, July 15'h, the proposed Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act, SB3, was
passed by the California Senate. In presenting SB3 to the floor, Senator Rainey, the author,
took amendments to strip the dollar amount from the measure. This allowed the bond measure
to pass with a simple majority vote instead of a two-thirds majority vote. The City of Temecula
has submitted letters in support of SB3 to each Committee Member in each step of this
process. Other sources of funding that are being pursued include County Mitigation funds and
Federal sources through Senator Barbara Boxer. In addition to City Staff pursuing funding, the
County Librarian continues to look for funding for the Temecula Library project, as the
Temecula Library is the highest circulating library in the Riverside County Library System and
is the County's number one library to be constructed once funding is identified.
R:XZIGLERGXXDEPTRPT\9907.doc
July Z2, 1999
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY"/""~'-~
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager
July 27, 1999
Granting of an Easement for Storm Drain Improvements for the First Street Bridge
RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency adopts a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-._
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST STREET
BRIDGE
BACKGROUND: The design of First Street Bridge Extension is complete and it has been
determined that a drainage pipe must be installed along the northerly side of First Street to collect
and convey the runoff from the intersection of Front Street and First Street/Santiago Road in order
to discharge the runoff into Murdeta Creek.
This easement needs to be granted by the Agency and recorded to facilitate construction
activities for the project.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 99-
2. Exhibit"A"
3. Exhibit"B"
4. Grant of Easement
\\TEMEC_FS2OI\DATA\DEPTS\REDEV\PROJECTS\G
RANTEASEMENTSTRMDRN.docl
RESOLUTION NO. 99-.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN
EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
RELATING TO THE FIRST STREET BRIDGE
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The legal description for the easement is set forth and
depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula grants to the City of Temecula an easement for the construction and
maintenance of storm drain improvements for the First Street Bridge. The grant of
easement and the scope thereof, shall be as set forth on the attached Easement Deed -
Drainage Purposes and the exhibits thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting on the 27t" day of July 1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSDIE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
\\TEMEC_FS201XDATAXDEPTSXREDEV~PROJECTSXRESOLUTIONGRANTEASEMENTSTRMDRN. doc
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Agency Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99- was duly and
regularly adopted by the Agency Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27b day of July 1999, by the following
vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
\\TEMEC_FS201XDATAXI)EPTSXREDEV'xPROJECTSx, RESOLUTIONGRANTEASEMENTSTRMDRN. doc
EXHIBIT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Former Property
Page 1 of 1
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. CITY OF TEMECULA, BEING THAT PORTION OF
PARCEL 1 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA93-0107, RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
334292 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, NORTH 45°29'22'' WEST 20.94 FEET TO
THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00
FEET. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF NON-TANGENT CURVE BEARS NORTH 47°50'18" WEST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.86 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24°51 "24" TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING THE CUSP OF A CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CUSP BEARS NORTH 6:4°34'07.'
WEST:
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTELRY LINE AND SAID CURVE 29.14 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°23'32'' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
NORRIS-REPKE, INC.
33055 VINO WAY
TEMECULA, CA 92591
JN 92-03/4
CONTAINING 224 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
A MAP ENTITLED "EXHIBIT !" IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: FIELD SURVEY BASED ON FIRST STREET WEST OF FRONT STREET BEARING
NORTH 44°30'26.' EAST PER PM 7674 (86/50o51).
~1 'No. C15446
~ 0 E \_" ~ NORRIS P E C15446.
REFERENCE FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. REPORT, ORDER # 2034432, DATED JUNE 22, 1995.
September 23, 1996
A.P.N. 922-073-022
E×H! !T
CURVE i =ADIUS LENGTH CELTA
:I ; 55.00' 23.86' 24'51'2~"
,:2 'if0.00' 29.1¢' 33'23'32"
LINE t :iRECTION ] DISTANCE~
L1 ~N -'5'29'22" W l 20.94'
P.O.B.
t C1\ :'%"
/I
FIRST STREET
N 44'30'26" E
C ALE AREA: 224 S.F. = (0.0051 AC)
.?O
FEET ) ' ~J'/~ ""i",v'l' } NORRIS--~EPKE INC
CLD,'E~ND INVESTMENT C0,
TEMECU~ INVESTMENT CO, ~NC. :,75 ~ u., 92-052
DRAWN RCN
APPP. JPN
ORDEP ~ 2034487
PCL. 1, LLA PA93-0107 DATE 9-83-96 ~
INST.~ 334292, O.R. SCALE ,'= S0
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA sY NORRIS-REPKE INC. i
CITY OF TEMECULA ~ E:\sdskproj\9203\dwg\jpn[d~.ctwg i.'
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF TEMECULA
PER GOVERNMENT CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City ofTemecula - City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
P O Box 9033
Teraecula CA 92589-9033
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P O Box 9033
Teme. cula CA 92589-9033
EASEMENT DEED - DRAINAGE PURPOSES
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GRANTS to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for drainage
purposes, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula,
State of California, described as:
See Attached Exhibit 'A" for Complete Description
IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument
this clay of , 1999
Print Name and Title
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE}
On , before me the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared
personally known to ,he (or proved to rite on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose na~te(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instntment
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and o/~]cial seal.
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY '~Z-/Y'/~""'~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager
July 27, 1999
Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly repod as of July 27, 1999 for the Redevelopment
Depadment.
HOUSING
First Time Homebuyers Program
Funding in the amount of $300,000 is available for FY 99-00. One Loan has been closed for
$24,000 with two loans pending. Sixteen loans closed in FY 98/99 in the amount of $336,760.
Residential Improvement Pro.clrams
For FY 99/00, two projects have been completed and twenty are in process. The program budget
is $200,000 and $9,277 has been funded. The majority of these projects are roof repairs, repainting
and fence replacement. Thirty-seven loans funded in FY 98/99 in the amount of $58,350.
Affordable Rental Housinc~ Projects
Agency staff has the responsibility for monitoring all projects obtaining Agency assistance to
rehabilitate existing affordable rental housing as well as new construction. After completion, annual
reporting is required to ensure all tenants continue to meet income criteria outlined in the Project
Regulatory Agreement and that all rents charged are within established affordable limits. During
July, the Rancho West Apartments (150 units)will be audited.
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\REDEV\SYERSK\MONTHLLY\REPORT.JULY.doc
Mission VillaRe Redevelol3ment Projects
Rehabilitation of 38 distressed affordable housing units is underway, and construction of 38 new
units has begun. All units will be occupied by very low and low-income families. Staff is currently
reviewing compliance of the Mission Village project.
Pujol Acquisitions for Affordable Housin,cl
Staff has initiated negotiations with six property owners in the Pujol area to purchase their property
for the future development of affordable housing. Two owners have accepted offers at the appraised
value, and two retumed counter-offers were accepted by the Agency Board. One additional counter-
offer has been received and will be presented to the Board on July 27.
Facade Improvement/Non-Conformin.cl Sign Pro.clram
The following facade improvement/sign projects are completed:
· Express Bodicare (new business on Front Street)
New signs only
· Musicians Workshop (Mercedes)
New handicap parking and restroom facilities, new front windows and front entry door
· U.S. Land (Front Street)
Exterior Paint
· Swing Inn (Front Street)
Exterior Paint
The following facade improvements are underway:
· Second Street Automotive (Second and Mercedes) - Complete Facade Renovation
· Rancon Building (Front Street)
- Repaint Trim
· Kreigers General Store (Mercedes)
New exterior facade and handicap restroom facilities
· Oak Park Suites (Front Street)
Exterior painting and wood shingle treatment
· The Porch Building (Front Street)
Fire Sprinklers
· Main Street Salon
Signs
R:\syersk\monthly\report. May
2
WINCHESTER HILLS
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUGUST 25, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority was called to
order at 7:43 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula,
California. Chairman Comerchero presiding.
PRESENT: 5
AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts,
Stone, and Comerchero.
ABSENT:
0 AUTHORITY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk
Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENTCALENDAR
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
MOTION: Authority Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Authority Member Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Authority Member Ford who abstained.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Advising that the necessary financing, selling of bonds, and closing has occurred, Executive
Director Bradley informed the Authority Members that the Winchester Hills Financing Authority
will not meet again until the need arises.
AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORT
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:44 P.M., the Temecula VVinchester Hills Financing Authority meeting was formally
adjourned.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
[SEAL]
ITEM 2
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Board of Directors
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
July 27, 1999
Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Services District No. 98-1
(Winchester Hills)
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director;;f)~-/
RECOMMENDATION:
entitled:
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. WHFA 99-
RESOLUTION NO. WHFA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE
LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 98-1 (WINCHESTER HILLS)
BACKGROUND: The Winchester Hills Financing Authority (the "Authority") was created
pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City of Temecula and the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency to assist in the refinancing of public improvements or bonds
in connection with fixed special assessment liens in the Winchester Hills area of the City. On
February 24, 1998, the Authority adopted two resolutions of intention relative to a proposed
community facilities district (the "District"). The resolutions of intention called for public
hearings on the formation of the District, the levy of special taxes therein and the issuance of
bonded indebtedness for the District. On April 14, 1998, resolutions were adopted forming the
District and declaring the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness.
On June 23, 1998 the Authority Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing the
issuance of special tax bonds. On July 29, 1998 special tax bonds in the amount of
$1 2,255,000 were issued. The bonds are special, limited obligations of the District secured
solely by the special taxes levied in the District, a letter of credit provided by the developer, and
amounts held in a reserve fund. The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1999-
00 fiscal year is $901,626.09.
FISCAL IMPACT:
is 9901,626.09.
special tax levy.
The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1999-00 fiscal year
This amount represents a 948,564.19 or 5.69% increase from the 1998-99
Attach men ts:
-Special Tax Calculation Worksheet
-Resolution No. WHFA 99-
1999-00 Budget
City Of Temecula
· CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills)
Special Tax Calculation Worksheet
Bonds Outstanding
Delinquency Rate for Fiscal Year 1998-99
$12,255,000.00
0.00%
March '00 Interest
September '00 Interest
September '00 Principal
Total Debt Service
Reserve Fund Requirement
Current Reserve Fund Balance
Surplus/(Deficit)
Reserve Adjustment
Total Obligation
929,565.00
941,530.95
11,965.95
381,802.50
381,802.50
165,000.00
928,605.00
928,605.00
Fiscal Agent
Tax Consultant (Webb)
Auditor -Controller
Foreclosure Counsel
Absorption/Disclosure
City Administration
Total Administration
Prior Year
Actual
1,875.00
5,500.00
104.00
7,500.00
14,979.00
A~u~ed
Amounts
2,000.00
5,500.00
100.00
1,250.00
7,900.00
Current Year
Levy
2,000.00
5,500.00
100.00
1,250.00
7,900.00
16,750.00
Total Obligation
Total Administration
Prior Year (Surplus)/Deficit
Reserve Fund Earnings
Total Requirement
Administration % of Levy
City's % of Levy
lTotal Levy :i
FY 1998-99 Levy
Difference
928,605.00
16,750.00
(6,546.31)
(37,182.60)
901,626.09
:901;626i09I
853,061.90
48,564.19
1.86%
0.88%
5.69%
RESOLUTION NO. WHFA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WINCHESTER HILLS
FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (WINCHESTER HILLS)
WHEREAS, the Winchester Hills Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community
Facilities District No. 98-1 (Winchester Hills), created pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. WHFA 98-01 in accordance
with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the
property located within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax
assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Winchester Hills
Financing Authority, acting as the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 98-1
(Winchester Hills) as follows:
Section 1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct.
Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. WHFA 98-11 and Ordinance No.
WHFA 98-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $901,626.09 on the parcels which
comprise the CFD for Fiscal Year 1999-00 as set forth on a magnetic tape to be provided by Albert
A. Webb Associates to the Auditor-Controller of the County.
Section 3. The special tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously
authorized by Ordinance No. WHFA No. 98-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by
the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 4. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part,
the costs of the following items:
Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded
indebtedness.
Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds,
if necessary.
Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as
provided in Resolution No. WHFA 98-11 and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any
other purpose.
Section 5. The Auditor-Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment
of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this
resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 98-1 (Winchester Hills)"
on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 6. The County Auditor-Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection pedod,
promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments,
penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any
expenses to be paid to the Auditor-Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be
in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section
29304 of the Government Code.
Section 7. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Winchester Hills Financing Authority at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th
day of July, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
ITEM 26
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager~-'':p''
July 27, 1999
An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Recommend Approval to the
City Council for PA98-0511, a Zoning Amendment to create a Planned
Development Overlay, and the Planning Commission's approval of PA98-0512, a
proposal to develop a 244 unit senior apartment complex with two and three story
buildings on an 8.13 acre lot.
Prepared by: Thomas Thornsley, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:
1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0512;
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING AMENDMENT-APPEAL)
AND PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN-APPEAL), UPHOLDING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO RECOMMEND
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING AMENDMENT) TO ESTABLISH A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND TO APROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT
PLAN) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 244 UNIT SENIOR
HOUSING COMPLEX ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 CC Appl 7~13-99.doc
1
3. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY FOR
PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND 181 OF THE TEMECULA
LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL "A"
OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0477, PREVIOUSLY
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511)
BACKGROUND: On March 17, 1998 the Planning Commission considered both Planning
Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment/Planned Development Overlay) and Planning
Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan). The Zoning Amendment was necessary to
create the Planned Development Overlay, which would allow Senior Citizen Housing as a
permitted use, thereby making way for the Development Plan proposal to build a 244 unit
senior housing complex. At that hearing, the following issues were brought up by the
Commissioners and the public: the compatibility of the land uses, traffic congestion created
by the proposed or potential uses and conflicts with the high school, and the visibility of the
site by the neighboring residences. The hearing was continued to allow staff time to address
these issues and both applications were brought back to the Planning Commission on June 2,
1999. After hearing staff's report, taking public testimony, and holding Commission Discussion
both projects were approved by a 3 to 1 vote (Commissioner's Fahey, Guerriero, and Webster
in favor and Commissioner Naggar against.).
On June 17, 1999, the last day of the appeal period, Chris Pedersen filed a forrhal appeal of the
Planning Commission's decision on both projects (See Attachment 2). The cited justifications for
the Appeal are addressed below.
ANALYSIS: Mr, Pedersen cited five primary issues as justification for denying both projects.
Issue 1. "The finding that PDO-3 (Planned Development Overlay 3) is less impacting than
BP (Business Park) is unfounded and not supported."
Response: Business Park permits a full range of industrial uses that would create conflicts
with the high school and neighboring residential area. When the list of potential
land uses for PDO-3 was prepared by staff and the applicant, the potentially
hazardous uses and those with heavy truck traffic were eliminated, The final list
of permitted and conditionally permitted uses included only those uses that were
considered to be low or off peak traffic generators, non-hazardous, and
compatible with the neighboring land uses.
Issue 2. "No environmental impact report was prepared to address the land use
compatibility with the high schooL"
Response: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial
Study was prepared for both of these projects to assure the compatibility and
consistency of PDO-3 and the senior housing with the surrounding community.
Based on the Initial Study it was determined that an Environmental Impact Report
was not required. Therefore, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated
Negative Declaration for these projects.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 2
Issue 3.
Response:
Issue 4.
Response:
Issue 5.
Response:
"The density for the senior housing is 50% higher than permitted for High Density
Residential·"
The density of the senior housing proposed in PDO-3 is consistent with the density
currently permitted for senior housing under High Density Residential. This allows
up to 30 dwelling units per acre (d.u./ac) as compared to 20 d.u./ac. allowed in the
High Density Residential zone for general use apartments..
"Apartments, senior or otherwise, are not permitted under PDO-3."
Senior Citizen Housing and congregate care are permitted use listed in PDO-3.
Multifamily residential (apartments) are not a permitted use.
"There is no traffic problem with any permitted use for that parcel as BP."
A traffic study was prepared to assess the traffic conditions for these projects. The
study determined that the use of the site as a Business Park would generate more
vehicle trips per day and create a greater conflict with the high school's morning
traffic than would senior citizen housing. The study indicates that the trip
generation for the senior apartments would be 890 trips per day while the
Business Park uses could generate 1,218 trips per day. Peak AM traffic for the
senior apartments would be 11 trips verses 135 in-bound trips for Business Park
uses during the same time that the high school is generating high traffic volumes.
Staff's review of the issues raise by Mr. Pedersen's has found that these issues were addressed
in the Planning Commission Staff Report of June 2, 1999, and/or discussed at the Planning
Commission Meeting of the same date. Mr. Pedersen did not speak at either Planning Commission
meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
SPECIFIC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council deny the appeal
and uphold the approval of Planning Applications No. PA98-O511 and PA98-O512. The project
proposes to meet the City zoning requirements, guidelines and policies regarding land use
compatibility and project design. Approval of the projects is based upon the following findings:
FINDINGS -ZONING AMENDMENT
The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of this Zoning Amendment - Planned
Development Overlay, makes the following findings:
The change is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Planning
Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) as proposed is compatible with the health,
safety and welfare of the community. The change in land use is in conformance with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
The change is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. The General Plan Land Use
Designation is Business Park and the requested Zoning Amendment will change the zoning
to Planned Development Overlay, which is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
3
The change will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with the
goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment will not have
an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and
policies of the adopted General Plan.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances, including; the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Pal·mar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets
the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project and has determined that, although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and
in the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rar(~ species or their
habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds· The project site
has been previously disturbed and graded, and street improvements have already been
installed on site. There are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or
endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further,
there is no indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration
corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project.
Attachments:
3.
4.
5.
6.
City Council Resolution No. 99-I- Page 5
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Page 9
Planned Development Overlay 3 (PDO-3) - Page 21
City Council Ordinance No. 99- ~ Page 31
Appeal of the Planning Commission Decision - Page 35
Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated June 2, 1999 - Page 36
Minutes of the Planning Commission hearing of March 17, 1999 - Page 37
Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission hearing of June 2, 1999 - Page 38
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING AMENDMENT-APPEAL)
AND PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN-APPEAL), UPHOLDING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO RECOMMEND
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING AMENDMENT) TO ESTABLISH A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT
PLAN) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 244 UNIT SENIOR
HOUSING COMPLEX ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085.
WHEREAS, Curt Miller, of Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., initiated Planning Applications No.
PA98-0511 and PA98-0512, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and PA98-0512 were processed
including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Applications No. PA98-0511
and PA98-0512 on March 17, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and
PA98-0512 to April 21, 1999, to allow the applicant time to address concerns and issues raised at
the March 17, 1999, Planning Commission Hearing;
WHEREAS, the Applicant withdrew the request for a General Plan Amendment, opted to
pursue a Planned Overlay District, and requested that Planning Applications PA98-0511 and PA98-
0512 be continued off calendar while revisions were being made;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Applications No. PA98-0511
and PA98-0512 on June 2, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and
approved PA98-0512;
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
6
WHEREAS, an Appeal was filed on June 17, 1999 requesting that Planning Applications
No. PA98-0511 and PA98-0512 be brought before the City Council for their consideration;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Applications
No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment - Appeal) and PA98-0512 (Development Plan - Appeal) on
July 13, 1999, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition to Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and PA98-0512;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Reports regarding Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and PA98-0512;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings for Zoninq Amendment. That City Council, in denying Planning
Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment Appeal) and upholding the Planning
Commission's decision recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning
Amendment) hereby makes the following findings;
A. The change is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) as proposed is compatible with the
health, safety and welfare of the community. The change in land use is in conformance with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
B. The change is consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan Land Use
Map. The General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park and the requested Zoning
Amendment will change the zoning to Planned Development Overlay, which is consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Map.
C. The change will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with
the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment will not have an
adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals ahd policies of the
adopted General Plan.
Section 2. Findings for Development Plan. That City Council, in denying Planning
Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan - Appeal) and upholding the Planning Commission's
decision approving PA98-0512 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as
required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code;
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent
with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mr. Palomar
Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets
the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was prepared for both of these
projects and indicates that although the proposed projects could have a significant impact on the
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 7
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative
Declaration with a DeMinimus impact finding, therefore, is hereby adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby conditionally
approves Planning Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan) a proposal to build a 244 unit
senior housing complex with two and three story apartment buildings on 8.3 acres, located at the
northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road, and known as Parcel "A" of Lot Line
Adjustment PA98-0477, previously assessor's parcel no. 911-170-078 and 911-170-085, and
subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 13th day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susarf W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
9
EXHIBITA
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
Project Description: A proposal to build a 244 unit senior housing complex
with two and three story apartment buildings on 8.3
acres. Located on the northwest corner of Nicolas Road
and Winchester Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Multi-Family
Assessor's Parcel No.: 911-170-078 and 911-170-085
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
3. This development plan approval date is contingent upon City Council approval of the Zoning
Amendment and the date the implementing ordinance goes into effect.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 10
m
o
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially to Exhibit D (Site Plan),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
The development of the building shall conform substantially to Exhibit E (Elevations),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
Landscaping shall conform substantially with the approved Conceptual Landscape
Plan, Exhibit F, and the criteria set forth in the General Plan, or as amended by these
conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained
to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager and the Development Code. If it is
determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall
have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into
conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all
landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in
interest. (Amended by the Planning Commission 612199)
The colors and materials used for this industrial building shall conform substantially to the
approved color and material board, or as amended by these conditions.
Material
Exterior Plaster in wood float sand finish
Wood Fascia and exposed wood trim
Accent Color on handrails, gutters & downspouts
Tile Roof
Color
La Habra Plaster Co. #x9511 (grey)
La Habra Plaster Co. #x3713 (beige)
La Habra Plaster Co. #x80220 (tan)
Olympic Satin "Outside White"
Frazee 4904D (light olive green)
Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-503 (dark grey)
Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-516 (medium grey)
Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-472 (tan/grey)
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints each of the Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural Elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall
be readable on the photographic prints.
11. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
11
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13. Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0477 shall be recorded.
14. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were
designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building.
15. The carports shall be redesigned to include architectural elements and color enhancements
similar to the main structures.
16. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
17. The perimeter landscaping shall provide shrubs, berms and/or walls to screen the parking
areas.
18. Three (3) copies of detailed Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance and conform substantially to the approved Exhibit "F"
Conceptual Landscape Plan or as amended by these conditions. The cover page shall
identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
19. The development of a bus stop as requested by the Riverside Transit Authority shall be
done so at no expense to the City. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining all
required encroachment permits.
20. Separate building permit applications for the installation of signage shall be submitted in
conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code.
21. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
22. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plans, shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
23. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed re~ectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 12
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
24. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
25. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the DepaFtment of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
26. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School-
Mitigation Fees.
27. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
28. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be R-1.
29. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
30. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
31. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
32. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main. entry.
33. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
34. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
35. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
36. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
37. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
38. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
39. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99,doc 13
40.
41.
42. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light
approvals and permits
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
standard and any block walls require separate
43. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
44. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
45. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
46. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State Right-of-
Way.
47. The vehicular movement for the driveway on Winchester Road is restricted to right in/right
out.
48. All improvement plans, grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
49. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
50. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required
for work within their Right-of-Way.
51. A permit from Army Corps of Engineers is required for any work within the Santa Gertrudis
Channel.
52. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
53. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
14
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make
required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Cbntrol Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
The Developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans prior to commencement
of any construction, including the proposed driveway, within the existing State Right-of-
Way.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Army Corps of Engineers
d. Planning Department
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
63. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to aC>plicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works,
The following design criteria shall be observed:
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
15
e. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
f. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
g. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461.
h. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
i. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
j. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
64. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
k. Improve Winchester Road (Urban Aderial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to
include installation of sidewalk, street lights and utilities (including but not limited
to water and sewer.
65. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public
Works.
I. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive
approaches and street lights
m. Storm drain facilities
n. Sewer and domestic water systems
66. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside
Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works.
67. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and
approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where
sidewalks meander through private property.
68. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
69. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
70. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
71. The existing Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Caltrans dated October
13, 1995 shall be amended to allow a right in/right out vehicular movement onto Winchester
Road.
72. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Develoher shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
o. Rancho California Water District
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 16
p. Eastern Municipal Water District
q. Department of Public Works
73. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
74. All public improvements, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
75. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
76. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy~ use, the Uniform
Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in force at the
time of building plan submittal.
77. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2400 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (UFC 903.2, Appendix
Ill.A)
78. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill.B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 "outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent
to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart and shall be located no more
than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access ro~d(s) frontage to
an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix Ill-B).
79. As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2).
80. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
81. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
70,000 Ibs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
17
82. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( UFC sec 902 and Ord 95-15).
83. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15).
84. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4).
85. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1 ).
86. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installatioFL Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3,901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ).
87. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3).
88. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15).
89. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a ~lirectory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall
be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
90. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15).
91. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC
Article 10).
92. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Krlox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 18
93.
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (UFC 902.4).
All .manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The TCSD has reviewed the aforementioned development plan and conditions the project as
follows:
General Conditions:
94. Prior to installation of arterial street lighting, the developer shall file an application with the
TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said street lighting into
the respective TCSD maintenance program.
95. During construction, the developer shall provide temporary measures acceptable to the
Department of Public Works for the protection of the Santa Gertrudis Recreational Trail
from any silt, drainage, or other construction debris.
96. All parkway landscaping and slope areas adjacent to the development shall be maintained
by the property owner.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits:
97. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the payment
of in-lieu fees equivalent to 1.43 acres of parkland, based upon the City's then current land
evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50% credit for private recreational opportunities
provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of
each building permit requested.
Prior to Certificate of Occupancy:
98. The developer shall provide permanent measures acceptable to the Department of Public
Works for the protection of the Santa Gertrudis Recreational Trail from silt and drainage.
OTHER AGENCIES
99. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal February 18, 1999, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by
the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal January 7, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water Districts transmittal January 11, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
102. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Eastern Information
Centers transmittal January 11, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
19
103.
104.
105.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Riverside Transit Agency
transmittal January 12, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in CALTRANS transmittal
February 3, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in CALTRANS transmittal
February 17, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
PLANNING COMMISSION
106.
The applicant shall prepare, and submit for the approval of the Planning Manager,
a disclosure statement identifying the adjacent high school use and those uses
reasonably anticipate to occur on the high school site. The applicant shall provide
a copy of the approved disclosure statement to each person occupying a unit in the
project. (Added by the Planning Commission 6~2~99)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
20
EXHIBIT B
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 3
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
21
NICOLAS/WINCHESTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17.22.120 Title
Sections 17.22.120 through 17.22.128 shall be known as "PDO-3" (NicolasANinchester Planned
Development Overlay District).
17.22.122 Purpose and intent
The NicolasANinchester Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-3) is intended to
provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique commercial
area within the city. The area is significantly constrained with easements, flood plains, potential
fault zones, and adjacent residential development. This special overlay zoning district regulation
is intended to permit a range of low impact business, office and commercial uses. Supplemental
performance standards have also been provided to ensure compatibility with the adjacent
neighborhoods and to protect adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials,
and other potentially objectionable impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special
regulations to supplement the regulations of land uses and development already existing within the
adopted Development Code.
17.22.124 Relationship with the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines
A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the
NicolasANinchester Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.126.
B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.128, the following rules and
regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area.
1. The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to
any development within a Business Park zoning district that are in effect at the time an application
is deemed complete.
2. The citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application
is deemed complete.
3. The approval requirements contained in the Developmen~ Code that are in
effect at the time an application is deemed complete.
4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete.
17.22.126 Use Regulations
The list of permitted land uses for the NicolasANinchester Planned Development Overlay
district is contained in Table 17.22.126. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a
permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval
of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
22
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automotive
Automotive
car wash
B
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use I PDO-3
A
Adult business
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq. ~.)
Airports
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient)
Alcoholic beverage sales
Ambulance services
Animal hospital (indoor only)
Antique restoration
Antique sales
Apparel and accessory shops
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances)
Arcades (pinball and video games)
Art supply stores
Auction houses
Auditoriums and conference facilities
Automobile dealers (new and used)
sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display
Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs
painting and body shop
repair services
rental
salvage yards/impound yards
service stations with or without an automated car wash
parts -sales
service stations selling beer and/or wine -with or without an automated
Bakery goods distribution
Bakery retail
Bakery wholesale
Banks and financial institutions
P
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
23
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use }PDO-3
Barber and beauty shops P
Bed and breakfast -
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) -
Billlard parlor/pool hall -
Binding of books and similar publications -
Blood bank P
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P
Bookstores -
Bowling alley
Building material sales
Butcher shop
C
Cabinet shop
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs)
Candy/confectionery sales
Car wash, full service
Carpet and rug cleaning
Catering services
Clothing sales
Coins, purchase and sales
Cold storage facilities
Communications and microwave installations
Communications equipment sales P
Community care facilities P
Computer sales and service P
Congregate care housing for the elderly~ P
Construction equipment sales, service or rental
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental
Convenience market
Costume rentals
Crematoriums
Cutlery -
D
Data processing equipment and systems P
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
24
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use PDO-3
Day care centers C
Delicatessen P
Discount/department store
Distribution facility
Drug store/pharmacy
Dry cleaners P
Dry cleaning plant
E
Emergency shelters
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage)
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage)
F
Feed and grain sales
Financial, insurance, real estate offices P
Fire and police stations P
Floor covering sales
Florist shop P
Food processing
Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity
Freight terminals
Fuel storage and distribution
Funeral parlors, mortuary
Furniture sales
Furniture transfer and storage
G
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service
Gas distribution, meter and control station
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft.
Glass and mirrors, retail sales
Governmental offices less than 5,000 sq. ft. P
Grocery store, retail
Grocery store, wholesale -
Guns and firearm sales -
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
25
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use J PDO-3
H
Hardware stores
Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ~.)
Health food store
Health care facility
Heliports
Hobby supply shop
Home and business maintenance service
Hospitals
Hotels/motels
I
Ice cream parlor
Impound yard
Interior decorating service
J
Junk or salvage yard
K
Kennel
L
Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers
Laundromat
Laundry service (commercial)
Libraries, museums and galleries (private)
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution
Liquor stores
Lithographic service
Locksmith
M
Machine shop
Machinery storage yard
Mail order businesses
P
P
P
P
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
26
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use I PDO-3
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the
Following:
Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of
goods within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry,
furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling,
and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or
fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or
the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing
within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and
terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or
semirefined products requiring further processing or manufacturing, and
outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage
Massage
Medical equipment sales/rental
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse2
Mobile home sales and service
Motion picture studio
Motorcycle sales and service
Movie theaters
Musical and recording studio
N
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club
Nurseries (retail)
Nursing homes/convalescent homes
O
Office equipment/supplies, sales/services
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft.
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but not limited
to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural,
engineering, real estate, insurance.
P
C
C
P
P
P
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
27
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use PDO-3
P
Paint and wallpaper stores
Parcel delivery services
Parking lots and parking structures
Pawnshop
Personal service shops
Pest control services
Pet grooming/pet shop
Photographic studio
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed)
Postal distribution
Postal services
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.)
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission)
Q
Reserved
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices
Radio/television transmitter
Recreational vehicle parks
Recreational vehicle sales
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard
Recycling collection facilities
Recycling processing facilities
Religious institution, without a day care or private school
Religious institution, with a private school
Religious institution, with a day care
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use
for use of the proprietor of the business)
Residential, multiple-family housing
Restaurant, drive-in/fast food
Restaurants and other eating establishments
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment
P
P
P
P
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
28
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use
Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage in BP and I'1)
Rooming and boarding houses
S
Scale, public
Schools, business and professional P
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) P
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories P
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)3 P
Solid waste disposal facility
Sports and recreational facilities
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building
Swap Meet, outdoor
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales
T
Tailor shop P
Taxi or limousine service
Tile sales
Tobacco shop
Tool and die casting
Transfer, moving and storage
Transportation terminals and stations
Truck rentals (no sales or/service)
TV/VCR repair
U
Upholstery shop I '
V
Vending machine sales and service -
W
Warehousing/distribution -
Watch repair -
Wedding chapels -
Welding shop -
Welding supply and service (enclosed) -
PDO-3
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
29
Y
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use PDO-3
Reserved
Z
Reserved
1. See Section 17.06.040. Dwelling units per net acre, High Density Residential
2. See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse facilities.
17.22,128 Supplemental Design and Setback Standards
A. All development within PDO-3 shall also comply with the following supplemental
buffering requirements:
When adjacent to residential uses: a transitional landscaped area, not less than five feet
in width shall be installed. The landscaping shall include (at a minimum) tree~, shrubs, and
appropriate ground cover and should be located outside of the walls used to screen these
business, office and commercial uses.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
30
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
31
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY FOR
PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND 181 OF THE TEMECULA
LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL "A"
OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0477, PREVIOUSLY
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the
State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The changes to the land use district
as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning
Map, and Exhibit "B" is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Development Code for
the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as many be amended hereafter from time to time
by the City Council of the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended
by placing in affect the zones as described in Planning Application PA98-0511 and listed below:
A. For the parcels identified as Parcel "A" of Lot Line Adjustr~ent PA98-0477,
previously Assessor's known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-170-078 and 911-170-085: change the
Zoning Designation from Planned Development Overlay (PDO) to Professional Office (PO); and,
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of
the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at
least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Findinqs The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA98-0511
(Zoning Amendment) hereby makes the following findings:
A. The change is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) as proposed is compatible with the
health, safety and welfare of the community. The change in land use is in conformance with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
B. The change is consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan Land Use
Map. The General Plan Land Use Designation has been changed to Professional Office and the
requested Zoning Amendment will change the zoning to Professional Office, which is consistent
with the General Plan Land Use Map.
C. The change will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with
the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment will not have an
adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the
adopted General Plan.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNI NG\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc 32
Section 4. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
Section 5. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for
this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond
those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The
Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes
would have not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. Two
areas, circulation, and air quality impacts, are expected to see small reductions in the anticipated
environmental impacts because there are fewer trips generated by senior housing than that
potentially generated by professional offices. As a result, the Planning CommiSsion determines
that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted
in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15
days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance,
together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the
same in the office of the City Clerk.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
33
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this __ day of ,1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1999, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the __ day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\T E M E C_FS201 \DATA\D E PTS\P LAN N I N G\STAF FRP'R511-512 pa 98 CC Appl 7-13-99. doc
34
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 AND PA98-0512
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
35
City of Temecula
Comm,mity Development Department
43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula · CA · 92590
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula · CA · 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 · FAX (909) 694-6477
Appeal
Original Case Number(s)
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or
dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or
enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code.
B. FILING REQUFREM'RNTS
1. Development Application.
2. Appeal Form.
3. Filing Fee.
C. NOTICE OF APPEAl, - ~ 1 ,IMIT
A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by
him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be
acted upon unless fled within fifteen (15) calendar days after service of written notice of the decision.
D. NOTICE OF APPEAL- CONTENTS
Appealingthedecisionof: f)htvtv'~'~ C~,~s,o,u '~Yu'~e, :~. ]c)9~
(Specify Director of Planning or Plenning Commission AND Action Date)
Specify exactly what is being appealed:
R:\FAGA~AppLIC\APp. App 7/16/97 klb 1
Reason or justification to support the appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal each issue which
the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of every item
of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary).
r~'6P~S L/4tg e U ~ {-
In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then
the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant
shall be allowed five (5) calendar days in which to refile the notice of appeal.
C
2/o: "'
R:\FAGAi~XPPLIC\XPPoXPP 7/16/97 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 AND PA98-0512
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DATED JUNE 2, 1999
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
36
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 2, 1999
Planning Application No. PA98-0511
(Zoning Amendment, Planned Development Overlay)
Plyinning Application No. PA98-0512
(Development Plan)
Prepared By: Thomas K. Thornsley, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No:. 99- recommending approval of
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment,
Planned Development Overlay) based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff R~port;
ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration. for Planning
Application Numbers PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment,
Planned Developmen;t Overlay) and PA98-0512
(Development Plan);
ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application Number PA98-0512 (Development Plan);
APPLICATION INFORMATION
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan); based upon
the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached ConditionS' of Approval:.
APPLICANT:
Curt Miller, Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc.
PROPOSAL:
Planning Application No. PA98-0511: a request to amend the
Zoning Map designations of property totaling 12.3 acres,
from Business Park (BP) to Planned Development Overlay.
Planning Application No. PA98-0512: a Development Plan
proposal to build a 244 unit senior housing complex with two
and three story apartment buildings on 8.3 acres·
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
LOCATION:
Located on the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and
Winchester Road (Parcel "A" of Lot Line Adjustment PA98-
0477 previously Assessor's Parcel Numbers 911-170-078
and 911-170 085)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: BP (Business Park)
EXISTING ZONING:
BP (Business Park)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: M (Medium Density Residential)
South: PI' (Public Institutional)
East: NC (Neighborhood Commercial); SP
Estates Specific Plan)
West: M (Medium Density Residential) and
Institution)
(Roripaugh
PI (Public
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Residential
South: Chaparral High School
East: Vacant
West: Residential and Chaparral High School
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area Gross:
Total Area Net:
Total Building Area
Building Footprint:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Hardscape:
361,548
355,580
217,900
90,400
126,770
100,810
37,600
sc suare feet
sc uare feet
sc uare feet
sc uare feet
sc uare feet
sc uare feet
sc uare feet
(8.3 acres)
(8.1 acres)
25.42%
35.66%
28.35%
10.57%
Parking Required:
Senior Housing' (¼ covered .spaces per unit) 122
+1 uncovered space per 5 units for auest parkinq 49
Total 171
spaces
spaces
spaces
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
Covered 122 spaces
Uncovered 151 spaces
Handicapped 8 spaces
Total 281 spaces
30 feet for two story building
42 feet for three story buildings
BACKGROUND
Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and PA98-0512 were brought before th~ Planning
Commission on March 17, 1999. Planning Application No. PA98-0511 was a request for a General
Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment and Planning Application No. PA98-0512 was a
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
Development Plan for senior apartments. The Planning Commission raised a number of issues
regarding these projects at that meeting and continued this item to the April 21, 1999, meeting. At
the Apdl meeting the Commission continued this item off-calendar. Staff distributed a revised Initial
Study and re-noticed the projects for the June 2, 1999 Planning Commission hearing.
The following issues were raised by the Commission: traffic, potentially permitted and conditionally
permitted uses, and development standards. Traffic concerns dealt with the con0icts between the
senior apartments, the high school, and the future development on the remainder of the site. Also
of concern was the possibility that the project might not be built and any. one of a number of more
intensive uses allowed under the Professional Office (PO) Zone could be developed at this site
further impacting traffic conditions. Additionally, the PO zone would allow 75 foot tall structures,
which would impact the neighboring residential development. Staff was directed to address these
concerns when the project was brought back before the Commission.
During the re-evaluation of Planning Application PA98-0511 (General Plan Amendment and Zoning
Amendment) staff determined that this application should be changed to a Planned Development
Overlay (PDO) with defined uses and development standards for this property. The establishment
of the PDO would be adopted through a Z. oning Amendment only, therefore, the applicant withdrew
his request for General Plan Amendment. Planning ApplicatiOn PA98-0512 for the senior
apartments has remained virtually the same with the exception of a new driveway being added on
Winchester Road to help with traffic circulation.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 is a request for a Zoning Amendment to change the City's
Zoning designations on 12.3 acres of property from Business Park (BP) to Planned Development
Overlay (PDO) and amend the Development Code, adding PDO-3. Planning Application No.
PA98-0512 (Development Plan) is a request for the construction of a 244 unit senior housing
complex, consisting of two and three story apartment buildings on 8.3 acres. The remaining four
acres, being re-designated to PDO, are not being proposed for development at this time.
ANALYSIS
Zoninq Amendment - Planned Development Overlay
The applicant had sought a location for senior housing in this community. They found there was
a limited amount of available property within the city that permits their type of development and also
met their criteria to be centrally located to goods and services, on a main transportation route, and
on flat terrain. The proposed site meets their needs, but is designated Business Park (BP) under
the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map, which does not permit senior housing. By
re-zoning the property for a PDO, senior housing and congregate care housing could be permitted
uses. By creating a PDO at this location, the City and the applicant can propose uses that meet
the needs of the community. In addition, the PDO will establish a list of uses that are less impacting
that those currently permitted.
Staff and the applicant worked together to establish a list of uses that would be allowed under the
PDO. Our criterion was to select uses that would not be intensive traffic generators nor would
conflict with the surrounding land uses [Exhibit B (PDO-3, Schedule of Permitted Uses) of Draft City
Council Ordinance]. The development standards have remained consistent with the standards that
are currently in effect under the Business Park zoning designation. The developer feels satisfied
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
that there are a sufficient variety of uses to allow versatility for the use of the undeveloped portion
of the site should they be unable to find a developer for an assisted living project.
Development Plan
Planning Application No. PA98-0512 proposes to build 244 dwelling units for senior housing (55
years of age and older) on 8.3 acres. There will be four building on the site with'one building, the
'largest, designed as a two story structure and the remainder being three' story structures. The
facility will have a mix of one and two bedroom units with a kitchen, dining area, living room, and
one or two baths. ,,
This facility is designed for active seniors and will p'rovide amenities like any apartment complex.
The applicant does not propose to offer any assisted living services in this complex.
Site Desicln and Circulation
The project originally took irs only access directly across form the high school's-student parking.
To provide for better circulation a second driveway on Nicolas Road will be opened for tenants and
a new tenant access will be installed on Winchester Road. With three points of,ingress and egress
tenants will have an opportunity to avoid the traffic congestion dudrig the schools peak traffic times.
All three points of ingress and egress will have card key gates located far enough into the site to
prevent vehicle stacking back onto the readways. The Winchester Road access will be shared with
the undeveloped portion of the site north of the senior apartments when it is dev. eloped. Caltrans
has consented to this access on the condition that it is right-in and right-out only. The applicant is
currently in the process of securing the design standard and proper permits from Caltrans.
Four buildings make up this complex (reference Exhibit D). The main building, is a two story
building and is located on the corner of Nicolas and Winchester Roads and is the largest with an
east and west wing. Each wing is rectangularity shaped with an internal courtyard. Building two
is located to the west of building one and is an "L" shaped three story structure. To the north,
buildings 'three and four are placed at angles away for the center of building one providing an
internal space between the three buildings. In this area are a pool, spa, patio, and. garden areas.
Access to all of the apartments will be from inside the structure with outside access at the ends or
the middle of the building. No units are .designed to have direct outside entries.
Courtyards, patios, and walkways will connect the buildings. The walkways meander between the
buildings through gardens and landscaped areas. Building two is located adjacent to a putting
green. Between buildings two and three and three and four are decorative patio areas that function
as entry points into the complex and provide access for emergency services.
Parking Analysis
The City's Development Code requires ~ covered spaces per unit (244 / ¼ = 122) and one
uncovered space per five units for guest parking (244 / 5 = 49). As designed the applicant is
proposing 122 covered stalls, 8 handicapped and 153 additional stalls for a total of 283 parking
stalls. The site provides 112 more parking stalls than required. The applicant indicates that they
need one space for each unit in the complex and that reduces the number of extra spaces down
to thirty-nine.
R:\STAFFRPT~511 ~512pa98 pc2a.doc
4
Architecture & Colors
The design of the apartments takes elements of the "Craftsman" style with clean lines, exposed
beams, low sloping roofiines with gables, and neutral tones. The fascias of the buildings will be
finished with a wood float stucco finish in light shades of gray, beige, and tan. To add relief, the
exterior walls will have multiple planes giving the building fascia depth. The windows will be
recessed and the second and third floors will appear to step back from the lower floors., Each unit
will have either a patio or a balcony with stucco walls on the ground floor patios'~nd wrought iron
on the upper floor balconies.
Building one is the main building with its entry facing the driveway from Nicolas Road. A 'fountain
will be the focal point into the building. Stacked sandstone veneer will enhance this entrance and
the other entry points around the buildings.
Roof colors will be a mix of light and dark grays and grayish-tan concrete tiles. The exposed wood
fascia and outlooker beams will be finished with light olive green for accent coloring. As designed,
the building will be very distinctive and appealing.
The carports proposed are post and beam design with a metal. trimmed roof that will have a
finished color to match the building stucco color. Staff felt that the carports should incorporate
some additional features such as the outlookers and utilize accent colors used on the main
building. The applicant has requested to maintain the simple unaccented look of the carport so that
they are less noticeable. Some of the carports are located along Winchester and Nicolas Roads
were they will be visible. Staff has added a condition of approval to assure that-the styling of the
carports be more articulated to be consistent with the main building.
Landscapinq
Thirty-five percent (35.66%) of the site has been landscaped. This exceeds the twenty-five percent
minimum landscaping requirement in the PO (Professional-Office) zone. The bulk of the
landscaping is provided along the two street frontages (Winchester Road and Nicholas Road) and
around the. perimeter of the buildings. A twenty-five foot landscape buffer has been provided
between the streets and the buildings. The street trees will be African Sumac (Rhus lances) and
dominant trees throughout the property are Carrotwood (Cupaniopsis Anacordioides), California
Sycamore (Pantanus Racemosa), African Sumac (Rhus Lancea), and Bottle Tree (Brachychiton
Populneus). Additional landscaping is provided between the buildings including landscaped paths
and gardens and two landscaped courtyards in building one.
Traffic Study
The Commission directed staff to address the following concems pertaining to tra~c. The following
information was gleaned from a traffic study prepared by the applicant.
1. Compatibility with Chaparral High School: According to the study, traffic at the "high school is
a discreet and predictable event that happens during the same time every weekday." The peak
traffic is from 7:00-7:15 AM in the morning and 2:30-2:45 PM in the afternoon. When the high
school is at full capacity and the senior apartments are in full operation the peak traffic volumes
indicate that left turn movements into the student parking lot at the high school will be at level "C".
This is the lowest rating at any driveway during the entire day.
R:\STAFFRP'r%511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
5
2. Senior Housing -vs- Business Park Uses: The study also provides a comparative assessment
of the volume of traffic that could be generated under the Business Park designation. The study
indicates that the trip generation for the .senior apartments would be 890 trips per day while
business park uses could be 1,218 tdps per day. The comparative study further analyzes the AM
and PM peak hours. According to the study, the AM peak traffic hour would have 11 tdps for senior
housing versus 135-in-bound trips for Business Park uses. The afternoon traffic is negligible
· because the senior housing's peak PM traffic occurs later than the school's mid-afternoon peak,
Therefore, the peak AM traffic would have the greatest direct conflict with the' high school.. In
summary, the traffic study concludes: 1 ) only two shod (30 minutes) peak traffic times will occur
on Nicolas Road during the AM & PM hours; 2) the senior apartments will generate only six to nine
outbound trips per hour; and 3) other potential uses found under the Business Park designation
would generate more traffic than senior housing dudrig peak commuter periods.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the
Conditions of Approval for the project. Any impacts will be mitigated to levels less than significant.
In addition, because the site has been previously disturbed, it contains no biological resources. As
a result staff is recommending that a De Minimus Impact Finding be made.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION
The current General Plan land use designation and the zoning classification is Business Park (BP).
Planning Application PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) is proposing to amend the Zoning Map, for
the requested 12.3 acres, to Planned Development Overlay (PDO-3).
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The development of the requested senior housing complex (PA98-0512) requires a change to the
City's Zoning Map and amendment to the Development Code. By changing the designation (PA98-
0511 ) from Business Park to Planned DevelOpment Overlay many of the least intensive uses
currently allowed will be permitted including senior housing. This project provides a specialized
housing need in the community that is not being met elsewhere. Converting this site to a
residential use is consistent with the varied mix of surrounding uses. Additionally, this site is in
proximity to a wide variety of community services that will be convenient to the future residents.
Therefore, the proposed Zoning Amendment (PA98-0511 ) will create zoning that is compatible with
the surrounding land uses without impacting the community. The Development Plan (PA98-0512)
for senior housing can be considered compatible and consistent with the surrounding area of
Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. With the approval of the Zoning Amendment the proposed
project will therefore be consistent with the City's General Plan and Development Code. Staff,
therefore, recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of PA98-0511 (Zoning
Amendment) to the City' Council and approve PA98-0512 (Development Plan) for a senior housing
project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2aodoc
6
FINDINGS -ZONING AMENDMENT
The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of this Zoning Amendment- Planned
Development Overlay, makes the following findings:
The change is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Planning
Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) as proposed is compatible with 'the health,
safety and welfare of the community, The change in land use is in conformance with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City, .
The change is consistent with the General 'Plan Land Use Map. The General Plan Land Use
Designation is Business Park and the requested Zoning Amendment will change the zoning
to Planned Development Overlay, which is consistent with the amended General Plan Land
Use Map.
The change will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with the
goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment will not have
an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and
policies of the adopted General Plan·
FINDINGS -DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances, including; the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets
thestandards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public
health,-safety and welfare.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project and has determined that, although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and
in the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project site
has been previously disturbed and graded, and street improvements.have already been
installed on site. There are no native. species of plants, no unique, rar. e, threatened or
endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further,
there is no indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration
corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a,doc
7
Attachments:
4.
5.
6.
PC Resolution No. 99- - (PA98-0511 ) - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - (Draft Ordinance No. 99- ) - Blue Page 13 Exhibit A - Vicinity Map - Blue Page 17
Exhibit B - Planned Development Overlay District No. 3 - Blue Page 19
PC Resolution No. 99- - (PA98-0512) - Blue .Page 29
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 33
Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 46
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 67
Correspondence - Blue Page 73
Exhibits - Blue Page 74
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Elevations
F. Landscape Plan
G, Floor Plans
H. Rendering
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
8
ATTACHMENT NO. 1'
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
R:'~STAFFRP'1~511-512pa98 pc2a,doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA' AMENDING THE
ZONING MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CITY FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND
181 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO
KNOWN AS PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA9'8-
0477, PREVIOUSLY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078
AND 911-170-085. (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 )"
WHEREAS, Curt Miller, of Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., initiated Planning Application No.
PA98-0511, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Applicatiori'No. PA98-0511 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Applications No. PA98-0511
and PA98-0512 on March 17, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Applications No. PA98:0511 and
PA98-0512 to April 21, 1999, to allow the applicant time to address concerns and issues raised at
the March 17, 1999, Planning Commission Hearing;
WHEREAS, the Applicant withdrew the request for a General Plan Amendment, opted to
pursue a Planned Overlay District, and requested that Planning Applications PA98-0511 and PA98-
0512 be continued off calendar while revisions were being made;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission re-considered Planning Application No. PA98-0511
on June 2, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning AppliCation No. PA98-0511;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
10
Section 2. Findings.
A. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of this General Plan
Amendments, make the following findings:
B. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of this Zoning Amendment,
Planned Development Overlay, makes the following findings:
1. The change is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) as proposed is compatible with, the
health, safety and .welfare of the community. The change in land use is in c0nf. ormance with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
2. The change is consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan Land Use
Map. The General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park and the requested Zoning
Amendment will change the zoning to Planned Development Overlay, which is consistent with the
amended General Plan Land Use Map.
3. The change will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with
the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment will not have an
adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the
adopted General Plan.
'Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for
this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond
those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The
Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes
would have not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. Two
areas, circulation, and air quality impacts, are expected to see small reductions in the anticipated
environmental impacts because there are fewer trips generated by senior housing than' that
potentially generated by professional offices. As a result, the Planning Commission determines
that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) and recommends that the City Council
do the following:
A. Adopt an Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Temecula. Amending the Zoning Map of the City of Temecula City for Property known as Lots 166
and 181 of the Temecula Land and Water Company, also Parcel "A" of Lot Line Adjustment PA98-
0477, previously Assessor's known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-170-078 and 911-170-085
(Planning Application No. PA98-0511 )" substantially in the form that is attached to this Resolution
as Exhibit A.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
11
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2"d day of June 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd .day of June,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
12
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99-
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc .
13
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY FOR ·
PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND 181 OF THE TEMECULA
LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL "A"
OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0477, PREVIOUSLY
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 )
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California? pursuant to the. Planning and Zoning law of the
State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The changes to the land use district
as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning
Map, and Exhibit "B" is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Development Code for
the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as many be amended hereafter from time to time
by the City Council of the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended
by placing in affect the zones as described in Planning Application PA98-0511 and listed below:
A. For the parcels identified as Parcel "A" of Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0477,
previously Assessor's known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-170-078 and 911-170-085: change the
Zoning Designation from Planned Development Overlay (PDO) to Professional Office (PO); and,
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of
the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at
least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Findings The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA98-0511
(Zoning Amendment) hereby makes the following findings:
A. The change is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) as proposed is compatible with the
health, safety and welfare of the community. The change in land use is in conformance with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
B. The change is consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan Land Use
Map. The General Plan Land Use Designation has been changed to Professional Office and the
requested Zoning Amendment will change the zoning to Professional Office, which is consistent
with the amended General Plan Land Use Map.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
14
C. The change will not have an adverse effect on the community and is consistent with
the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment will not have an
adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the
adopted General Plan.
Section 4. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
ado_ption.
Section 5. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for
this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond
those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the-City General Plan. The
Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes
would have not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. Two
areas, circulation, and air quality impacts, are expected to see small reductions in the anticipated
environmental impacts because there are fewer trips generated by senior housing than that
potentially generated by professional offices. As a result, the Planning Commission determines
that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted
in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15
days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance,
together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the
same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
15
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this __ day of ,1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California; do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and' placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1999, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the __ day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
16
EXHIBIT A
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
17
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511
(Zoning Amendment - Planned Development Overlay PDO-3)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
18
EXHIBIT B
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 3
R:~,STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
19
· NICOLAS/WINCHESTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17.22.120 Title
Sections 17.22.120 through 17.22.128 shall be known as "PDO-3" (NicolasANinchester Planned
Development Overlay District).
17~22.122 Purpose and intent
The NicolasNVinchester'Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-3) is intended to
provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique commercial
area within the city. The area is significantly constrained with easements, flood plains, potential
fault zones, and adjacent residential development. This special overlay zoning distdct regulation
is intended to permit a range of neighborhood convenience uses, with selected outdoor storage and
other appropriate rural serving commercial uses. Supplemental performance standards have also
been provided to ensure compatibility with the adjacent neighborhoods and to protect adjoining
uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially objectionable
impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement the regulations
of land uses and development already existing within the adopted Developmen[ Code.
17.22.124 Relationship with the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines
A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the
NicolasNVinchester Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.126.
B. Except as modified by the provisions of Sectior~ 17.22.128, the following rules and
regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area.
1. The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to
anydevelopment within a Noighborhood Commcrcial zoning district that are in effect at the time
an application is deemei:l complete.
2. The cityWide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application
is deemed complete.
3. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code'that are in
effect at the time an application is deemed complete.
4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete.
17.22.126 Use Regulations
The list of permitted land uses for the Nicolas/Winchester Planned Development Overlay
district is contained in Table 17.22.126. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a
permitted use. A letter ~'C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval
of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone.
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
20
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use
A
Adult business _
Aerobicsldancelgymnasticsljazzerciselmartial ads studios (less than 5,000 sq: ft.) C
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts'studios (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.) -
Airports _
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient)
Alcoholic beverage sales
Ambulance services
Animal hospital (indoor only)
Antique restoration
Antique sales
Apparel and accessory shops
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) -
Arcades (pinball and video games) _
Art supply stores _
Auction houses _
AuditoriUms and conference facilities _.
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automotive
Automotive
car wash
dealers (new and used)
sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and u'sed)-no outdoor display
Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs
painting and body shop
repair services
rental
salvage yards/impound yards
service stations with or without an automated car wash
parts -sales
service stations selling beer and/or wine -with or without an automated
Bakery goods distribution
Bakery retail
Bakery wholesale
Banks and financial institutions
B
R:\STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
21
J. PDO-3
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Barber and beauty shops
'Bed and breakfast
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services)
Billlard parlor/pool hall
Binding of books and similar publications
Blood bank
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services
Bookstores
Bowling' alley
Building material sales
Butcher shop
Cabinet shop
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs)
Candy/confectionery sales
Car wash, full service
Carpet and rug cleaning
Catering services
Clothing-sales.
Coins, purchase and sales
Cold storage facilities
Communications and microwave installations
Communications equipment sales
Community care facilities
Computer sales and service
Congregate care housing for the elderly~
Construction equipment sales, service or rental
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental
Convenience market
Costume rentals
Crematoriums
Cutlery
Data processing equipment and systems
R:\STAFFRP"R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
Description of Use
C
D
22
I PDO-3
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
I P
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
'Day cam centers
Delicatessen
Discount/department store
Distribution facility'
Drug store/pharmacy
Dry cleaners
Dry cleaning plant
Description of Use
E
Emergency shelters
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage)
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage)
F
Feed and grain sales
Financial, insurance, real estate offices
Fire and police stations
Floor covering sales
Florist shop
Food processing
Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity
Freight terminals
Fuel storage and distribution
Funeral parlors, mortuary
Furniture sales
Furniture transfer and storage
G
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service
Gas distribution, meter and control station
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ~.
Glass and mirrors, retail sales
Governmental offices less than 5,000 sq. ~.
Grocery store, retail :
Grocery store, wholesale
Guns and firearm sales
I.PDO-3.
C
.P
P
P
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc .
23
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use
H
Hardware stores
Health and exercise clubs (les~ than 5,000 sq. ft.) P
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Health food store -
Health care facility P
Heliports -
Hobby supply shop -
Home and business maintenance service -
Hospitals -
Hotels/motels -
Ice cream parlor
Impound yard
Interior decorating service
Junk or salvage yard
J
K
Kennel
L
Laboratories, film, medical, 'research 'or testing centers
Laundromat
Laundry service (commercial)
Libraries, museums and galleries (private)
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution
Liquor stores
Lithographic service
Locksmith
Machine shop
Machinery storage yard
Mail order businesses
M
PDO-3
P
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
24
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use I PDO-3
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the
Following:
Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of
goods within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry,
furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling,
and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or
fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or
the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing
within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and
terminals, s~orage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw Dr
semirefined products requiring further processing or manufacturing, and
outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage
Massage
Medical equipment sales/rental
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse2
Mobile home sales and service
Motion picture studio
Motorcycle sales and service
Movie theaters
Musical and recording studio
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club
Nurseries (retail)
Nursing homes/convalescent homes
N
O
Office equipment/supplies, sales/services
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft.
P
C
C
P
P
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
25 -'
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but not limited
to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, 'architectural, p
engineering, real estate, insurance.
P
Paint and wallpaper stores
Parcel .delivery services
Parking lots and parking structures
Pawnshop
Personal service shops
Pest control services
Pet grooming/pet shop
Photographic studio
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed)
Postal distribution
Postal services
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.)
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission)
Q
Reserved '
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices
Radio/television transmitter
Recreational vehicle parks
Recreational vehicle sales
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard
Recycling collection facilities
Recycling processing facilities
Religious institution, without a day care or private school
Religious institution, with a private school
Religious institution, with a day care
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use
for use of the proprietor of the business)'
PDO-3
P
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
26
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use I PDO-3
Residential, multiple-family housing -
Restaurant, drive-in/fast food -
Restaurants and other eating establishments P
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment -
Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage in BP and LI) -
Rooming and boarding houses -
S
Scale, public
Schools, business and professional
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12)
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)3
Solid waste disposal facility
Sports and recreational facilities
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building
Swap Meet, outdoor
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales
Tailor shop-
Taxi or limousine service
Tile sales
Tobacco shop
Tool and die casting
Transfer, moving and storage
Transportation terminals and stations
Truck rentals (no sales or/service)
TVNCR repair
Upholstery shop
rending machine sales and service
Warehousing/distribution
T
U
V
W
P
P
P
P
P
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
27
Table 17.22.126
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Northwest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development Overlay
District
Description of Use
Watch repair
Wedding chapels
Welding shop
Welding supply and service (enclosed)
Reserved
Reserved
Y
Z
See Section 17.06.040. Dwelling units per net acre, High Density Residential
PDO-3
See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse facilities.
17.22.128 Supplemental Design and Setback Standards
A. All development within PDO-3 shall also comply with the following supplemental
buffering requirements:
1. When adjacent to residential uses: a transitional landscaped area, not less
than five feet in width shall be installed. The landscaping shall include (at a minimum) trees,
shrubs, and appropriate ground cover and should be located outside of the walls used to screen
these commercial uses.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
28
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
R:\STAFFRPT~I 1-512pa98 pc2a.doc
29
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) A PROPOSAL TO BUILD A
244 UNIT SENIOR HOUSING COMPLEX WITH TWO AND THREE
STORY APARTMENT BUILDINGS ON 8.3 ACRES;. LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD,. KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND 181 OF THE
TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO KNOWN AS
PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0477,
PREVIOUSLY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 and 911 -
170-085
WHEREAS, Curt Miller, of Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc.,.~led Planning Application No. PA98-
0512, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0512 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Applications No. PA98-0511
and PA98-0512 on March 17, 1999, at a duly noticed public he.adng as prescribed by law, at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Applications No. PA98-0511 and
PA98-0512 to April 21, 1999, to allow the applicant time to address concerns and issues raised at
the March t 7, 1999, Planning Commission Hearing;
WHEREAS, the Applicant withdrew the request for a General Plan AmendmenL opted to
pursue a Planned Overlay DiStrict, and requested that Planning Applications PA98-051,1 and PA98-
0512 be continued off calendar while revisions were being made;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0512, on
June 2, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA98-0512;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
30
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA98-0512 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent
with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar
'Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for. the protect. ion of the public
health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets
the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
C. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the
Conditions of Approval added to the project.
D. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species
or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project site
has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native
species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native
vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist,
or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this
project.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was prepared for this project and
indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described ih the
Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration with
a DeMinimus impact finding, therefore, is hereby adopted..
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan) a proposal to build
a 244 unit senior housing complex with two and three story apartment buildings on 8.3 acres,
located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road, and known as Parcel "A"
of Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0477, previously assessor's parcel no. 911-170-078 and 911-170-
085, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
31
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP'I:ED this 2nd day of June, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of June,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISS'IONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
32
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 pc2a.doc .
33
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
A proposal to build a244. unit senior housing complex
with. two and three story apartment-buildings on 8.3
acres. LOcated on the northwest corner of Nicolas Road
and Winchester Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Multi-Family
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-078 and 911-170-085
June 2, 1999
June 2, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this' Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period {he applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above,' the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality-thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take,any and,all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
34
This development plan approval date is contingent upon City Council approval of the Zoning
Amendment and the date the implementing ordinance goes into effect.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
o
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially to Exhibit D (Site Plan),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
The development of the building shall conform substantially to Exhibit E (Elevations),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
o
Landscaping shall conform substantially with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan,
Exhibit F, or as amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall
be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager and the
Development Code. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the
Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the
landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
,
The colors and materials used for this industrial building shall conform substantially to the
approved color and material board, or as amended by these conditions.
Material
Color
Exterior Plaster in wood float sand finish
Wood Fascia and exposed wood trim
Accent Color on handrails,' gutters & downspouts
Tile Roof
La Habra Plaster Co. #x9511 .(grey)
La Habra Plaster Co. #x3713 (beige)
La Habra Plaster Co. #x80220 (tan)
Olympic Satin "Outside White"
Frazee 4904D (light olive green)
Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-503 (dark grey)
Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-516 (medium grey)
Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-472 (tan/grey)
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints each of the Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural Elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall
be readable on the photographic prints.
11.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
35
12.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13.
14.
Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0477 shall be recorded.
All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were
designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building.
15.
The carports shall be redesigned to include architectural elements and color enhancements
similar to the main structures.
16. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
17.
18.
The perimeter landscaping shall provide shrubs, berms and/or walls to screen the parking
areas.
Three (3) copies of detailed Construction Landscaping, and Irrigation Plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance and conform substantially to the approved Exhibit "F"
Conceptual Landscape Plan or as amended by these conditions. The cover page shall
identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The.plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total.. cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of. Occupancy Permits
19.
20.
The development of a bus stop as requested by the Riverside Transit Authority shall be
done so at no expense to the City. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining all
required encroachment permits.
Separate building permit applications for the installation of signage shall be submitted in
conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code.
21.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
22.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plans, shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division .for one year'from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
36
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition .satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
23.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed re~ectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a. minimum '
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each .entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000.". '
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
24.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
25.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not-to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
26.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
27.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
28. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be R-1.
29. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
30.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
31. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
32. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a .doc
37
33. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
34.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
35.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
36.
37.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with originar signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
38.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
39.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
40.
41.
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
42. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls require separate
approvals and permits
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
43..
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to
.any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
44.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
45.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
46.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Califomia Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State Right-of-
Way.
47.
The vehicular movement for the driveway on Winchester Road is restricted to right in/right
out.
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
38
48.
All improvement plans, grading plans'shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
49. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic'and hydraulic
calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water-
Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
50.
A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is i'equired
for work within their Right-of-Way.
51.
A permit from Army Corps of Engineers is required for any work within the Santa Gertrudis
Channel.
52.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
53.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion' control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
54.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
55.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make
required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
56.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Dischai'ge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
57.
The Developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans prior to commencement
of any construction, including the proposed driveway, within the existing State Right-of-
Way.
58.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
39
'a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Army Corps of Engineers
Planning Department
59.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the. Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. '
60.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
61.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
62.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
63.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecuta Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P,C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving..
Driveways 'shall Conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
64.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
40
Improve Winchester Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to
include installation of sidewalk, street lights and utilities (including but not limited
to water and sewer.
65.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public
Works.
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive
approaches and street lights
Storm drain facilities
Sewer and domestic water systems
66.
Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside
Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works.
67.
All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and
approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where
sidewalks meander through private property.
68.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
69. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
70.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code. and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
71.
The existing Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Caltrans dated October
13, 1995 shall be amended to allow a dght in/right out vehicular movement onto Winchester
Road.
72.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
73. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
74.
All public improvements, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
41
75.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired. or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
76.
77.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the Uniform
Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in force at the
time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is r~quired to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2400 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (UFC 903.2, Appendix
Ill.A)
78.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill.B, Table A-IIIoB-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" × 2-2 "outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent
to public streets. Hydrants shall be, spaced at 450 feet apart and shall be located no more
than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access rOad(s) frontage to
an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903'.4.2, and
Appendix Ill-B).
79.
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2).
80.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approVed access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
81.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
70,000 Ibs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
82.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
42
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( UFC sec 902 and Ord 95-15).
83.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15).
84.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4).
85.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1).
86.
Prior to 'issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ).
87.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3).
88.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building..The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)inches for
suite identification on a' contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15).
89.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy' or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall
be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
90.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15).
91.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alar. m
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC
Article 10).
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
43
92.
93.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (UFC 902.4).
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES' DEPARTMENT
The TCSD has reviewed the aforementioned development plan and conditions the project as
follows:
General Conditions:
94.
95.
Prior to installation of arterial street lighting, the developer shall file an application with the
TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said street lighting into
the respective TCSD maintenance program.
During construction, the developer shall provide temporary measures acceptable to the
Department of Public Works for the protection of the Santa Gertrudis Recreational Trail
from any silt, drainage, or other construction debris.
96.
All parkway landscaping and slope areas adjacent to the development shall be maintained
by the property owner.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits:
97.
The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the payment
of in-lieu fees equiyalent to 1.43 acres of parkland, based upon the City's then current land
evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50% credit for private recreational opportunities
provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of
each building permit .requested..
Prior to Certificate of Occupancy:
98.
The developer shall provide permanent measures acceptable to the Department of Public
Works for the protection of the Santa Gertrudis Recreational Trail from silt and drainage.
OTHER AGENCIES
99.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance withthe Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal February 18, 1999, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by
the District), based upon the prevailing area d rainage plan fee.
100.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal January 7, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
44
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water Districts transmittal January 11, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Eastern Information
Centers transmittal January 11, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Riverside Transit Agency
transmittal January 12, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in CALTRANS transmittal
February 37 1999, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in CALTRANS transmittal
February 17, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
By placiag my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to' the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\STAR~RP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
45
DAVr-D P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
February18,1999
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/955 - 1200
909/788-9965 FAX
Mr. Thomas Thomsley
City. of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Thomsley:
Re:' PA 98-0512
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions. or other land use cases in
incorporated Cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases, or provide State
Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District
comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the
District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage
facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and
District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general
nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following
comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed
project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue.
PA 98-0512 is a proposal for a development of a 244 unit senior apartment complex with two and
three story buildings on an 8.13 acre lot located on the northeast comer of Winchester Road and
Nicholas Road.
This project is adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Channel. The applicant should ensure that the grading of
the site would not create a levee condition in relationship to the channel. If a levee condition is
created it would jeopardize the District's CLOMR-#91-09-48R for Santa Gemdis Channel.
Any work that involves the District's right of way, easements or facilities, will require an
encroachment permit fi'om the District.
The City should condition the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans or other information
needed to meet FEMA requirements. This project is located within the limits of the District's
Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Creek Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been
adopted. Applicable fees should be paid to the Flood Control District, at the time of issuance of
building and grading permits. i~' ~ rB ~'
2 3 s999
Mr. Thomas ThornsIcy '2-
Re: PA 98-0512
February 18, 1999
Questions regarding this matter may be directed to me at 909/955-1214.
Very truly yours,
STUARTE. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
SM:mcv
PC\55938
TO:
FROM:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: January. 7, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
'LC~~as T~o
, nmental Health Specialist III..
PLOT PLAN NO. PA98-0512
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan PA98-0512 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022. "
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE:
Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson
stand3b.doc
W ter
Board or Directors:
Ralph H, Daily
Doug Kulberg
St. Vice President
Lisa D. Herman
Csaba F. Ko
Scott A. Mclntyre
Jeffrey L, Minkler
George M. Woods
Officers:
John F. Hennigar
General Manager
Phillip L. Forbes
Direcwr of Finance-
Treasurer
E. P. '~ob" Lemons
Director of Eng~neenng
Kenneth C. Dealy
Director of Operations
& Maintenance
Perry fL Louck
Controller
Linda M. Frsgoso
Di'stnct Secretary/Admtnistrauve
Services Manager
C. Michael Cowett
Best Best & Krieger LLP
General Counsel
Janua~ 11,1999
Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PORTION OF LOT NO. 181
MAP BOOK 8, PAGE 359, SAN DIEGO
APN 911-170-085 AND APN 911-170-078
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency A~reement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
~ you h--v" on,, questiens, p!ease "ont~,'t an Engineering S"n,ir'=s
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
99\SB:mc011 ~F012-T6/FCF
C: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Ran6ho California Water District
42135 Winchester Road · Post Office Box 9017 · Temecula. California 92589-9017 · t909~ 676-4101 · F,~X '909) 676-0615
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
ilJ~'EI~IDE
Eastern InformaUon Center
Department of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
January 1!, 1999
Thomas Thomsley
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P. O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Case No.:
Applicant:
PA98-0512
Curt Miller, Pacific Gulf Properties
Dear Mr. Thomsley:
Please find enclosed our comments for one project transmittal as requested by the Planning
Department. If you have any questions, please contact the Eastern Information Center at
(909) 787-5745.
PA98-0512 ....................................... Jan. 19, 1999
Sincerely,
Martha Smith
Information Officer
Enclosure(s)
' ~
i: !", ; jAN ] 2 1999
3y
'CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
iNFORMATION
.SYSTEM
'Eastern Information Center
Department of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW
DATE: (,z~.,. '~ /
RE: Case Transmittal Reference Designation: P/~ '~ F~- 19~/~__//'~/::'/J
~//- /
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have
been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources:
The proposed project am has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adj~iccnt to known cultural
resource(s). A Phase I study is recommcnde, xt.
Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study
is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the
project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not
recommended.
V/""/A Phase I cultural resource study (MF # ~G ) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
~"if, 'during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while
a qualified archaeoiogist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be mohitored by a professional
archaeologist.
The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological
Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin
4(a), Decen;ber 1989.
Phase I
Phase II
Phase 1II
Phase IV
Records search and field survey
Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.]
Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two.]
Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
EICXFRMS\TRANSMIT
January12,1999
Riverside Transit Agent'y
1825 Third Street
P.O. Box 59968
Riverside. CA 92517
Phone: (909) 684-0850
Fax: (909) 684-1007
Mr. Thomas Thornsley
City of Temecula
Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
RE: PA98-.051tF
RTA presently provides transit service on Winchester Road via RTA Route 23A. We currently do
not have a bus stop serving the area in the proposed senior apartment development site, however,
based on the size of this development and our own plans for future growth, we are requesting that
a bus turnout be incorporated into the general design. Ideal site for the bus turnout would be on
Winchester Road farside the future access driveway adjacent to the proposed Building Four.
If possible, we would also like to request that pedestrian openings be provided near the turnout
locations specified above. Paved, lighted and handicapped accessible pedestrian accessway
consistent with ADA standards should be provided between the stop and the project site. I can
indicate the exact location for the turnout as the project progresses.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. Please keep us updated on the status-of this
request and should you require additional information, please call me at (909)684-0850.
Sincerely,
~e~'mentef~~,
Transit Planner
jsc/PDEV#248
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, 464 W. 4th STREET, 6th FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400
Gray Davis, Governor
February 3, 1999
08-RiV-79-R3.98
Mr. Thomas Thornsley
Assistant Planner
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
Planning Application No. PA98-0512
Thank you for forwarding the preliminary site and grading
plans to this office. We have completed our review of the
documents and have the following comments:
The preliminary grading plan submitted to this office
depict a median on Winchester Road (State Route 79), but does
not indicate whether that median is raised or not. Section A-A
doesn't indicate any median.
After reviewing the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the State of California, Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) and the City of T~mecula which was finalized on
November 13, 1995, the proposed access driveway on the future
Care Facility parcel will only'be allowed if the median
Winchester Road is in fact a raised median. In addition, 1/8
mile spaclng is required for limited access driveways and shall
be right-in, right-out only.
This project may require an encroachment permit if there
is any work, including work pertaining to: access,
grading, or drainage; within, abutting or impacting the
State highway right of way. The Department of
Transportation would be a responsible agency and may
require certain measures be provided as a condition of
permit issuance.
If an encroachment permit is required, it can be
obtained from the District 8 Permits Office pri~r
beginning of work Their address and phone n~,~~
listed below:
January12,1999
Riverside Transit Agency
1825 Third Street
P.O. Box 59968
Riverside, CA 92517
Phone: (909) 684-0850
Fax: (909) 684-1007
Mr. Thomas Thomsley
City of Temecula
Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
RE: PA98-.051tr
RTA presently provides transit service on Winchester Road via RTA Route 23A. We currently do
not have a bus stop serving the area in the proposed senior apartment development site, however,
based on the size of this development and our own plans for future growth, we are requesting that
a bus turnout be incorporated into the general design. Ideal site for the bus turnout would be on
Winchester Road farside the future access driveway adjacent to the proposed Building Four.
If possible, we would also like to request that pedestrian openings be provided near the ramout
locations specified above. Paved, lighted and handicapped accessible pedestrian accessway
consistent with ADA standards should be provided between the stop and the project site. I can
indicate the exact location for the turnout as the project progresses.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. Please keep us updated on the status-of this
request and should you require additional information, please call me at (909)684-0850.
Sincerely,
Transit Planner
jsc/PDEV#248
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, 464 W. 4th STREET, ~th FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400
Gray Davis. Governor
Mr. Thomas Thornsley
Assistant Planner
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
February 3, 1999
08-Riv-79-R3.98
Planning Application No. PA98-0512
Thank you for forwarding the preliminary site and grading
plans to this office. We have completed our review of the
documents and have the following comments:
The preliminary grading plan submitted to this office
depict a median on Winchester Road (State Route 79), but does
not indicate whether that median is raised or not. Section A-A
doesn't indicate any median.
After reviewing the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the State of California, Department of Transportation
(Caltrans)'and the City of T~mecula which was finalized on
November 13, 1995, the proposed access driveway on the future
Care Facility parcel will onlybe allowed if the median on..
Winchester Road is in fact a raised median. In addition, 1/8
mile spacLng is required for limited access driveways and shall
be right-in, right-out only.
This project may require an encroachment permit if there
is any work, including work pertaining to: access,
grading, or drainage; within, abutting or impacting the
State highway right of way. The Department of
Transportation would be a responsible agency and may
require certain measures be provided as a condition of
permit issuance.
If an encroachment permit is required, it can be
obtained from the District 8 Permits Office pri~r t~
beginning of work Their address and phone ~ ~ ~
listed below: ~ u= ~
ltil F~B ~ 15e~' U~
Mr. Thomas Thornsley
February 3, 1999
Page 2
Office of Permits
California DeparEment of Transportation
464 West Fourth Street, 6th Floor, MS619
San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400
(909) 383-4526
(909
If you have any questions, please contact Jim Betty at
383-4473 or FAX (909) 383-5936.
Sincerely,
LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of Forecasting/
Development Review
CC:
CC:
Hideo Sugita, RCTC
Naidu Athuluru, Encroachment Permits, Riv Co., D8
b'rATE OF OALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, 464 W. 4th STREET, 6th FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400
Gray Dmvis, Governor
Mr. Thomas Thornsley
Assistant Planner
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
February 17, 1999
08-Riv~79-R3.98
Planning Application No. PA98-05!2
This letter is in response to our conversation on Tuesday,
February 16, 1999. I received your letter from the Riverside
Transit Agency (RTA) via FAX requesting a bus turnout on the
above-mentioned project.
A bus turnout will be allowed only if it meets Caltran's
approval. Please submit previously requested plans in a letter
dated February 3, 1999 from this office which includes the bus
turnout design. All previously requested items in that letter
still apply.
For sight distance safety it is recommended that PROPOSED
FAR-SIDE BUS TURNOUT ADJACENT TO BUILDING NUMBER 4, begin its
,approach taper' a minimum distance of 50' (feet).to the west
from the proposed access driveway on the proposed future'Care
Facility property. This is very near the property line between
the Care ~acitity and the Senior Apartment Complex.
This project will require an encroachment permit if
there is any work, including work pertaining to: access,
grading, or drainage; within, abutting or impacting the
State highway Right of Way. The Department of
Transportation would be a responsible agency and may
require certain measures be provided as a condition of
permit issuance.
If an encroachment permit is required, it can be
obtained from the District 8 Permits Office prior to
beginning of work. Their address
listed below:
and phone nUF~.~cr a%~
Mr. Thomas Thornsley
February 17, 1999
Page 2
(909
CC:
Office of Permits
California Department of Transportation
464 West Fourth Street, 6th Floor, MS6!9
San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400
(909) 383-4526
If you have any questions, please contact Jim Belty at
383-4473 or FAX (909) 383-5936..
Sincerely,
LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of Forecasting/
Development Review
Hideo Sugita, RCTC
Naidu Athuluru, Encroachment-Permits, Riv Co.,'Dg
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:~STAFFRFr~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
46
Proj.ect Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Designation (Current)
Zoning (Current)
Description of Project PA98-0511 (Zoning
Amendment, Planned Development
Overlay)
Description of Project PA98-0512
(Development Plan)
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval is
required
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Planning Application No. PA98-051 t (Zone Change, Planned
Development Overlay) and Planning Application PA98-0512
(Development Plan)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Thomas Thornsley
(909) 694-6400
Located on the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and
Winchester Road (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 911-170-078,
911-170-085)
Curt Miller, Pacific Golf Properties
4220 Von Karman, Newport Beach, CA 92660
Business Park (BP)
Business Park (BP)
A request to change the land uses and development standards
on three parcels totaling 12.3 acres with a current Zoning Map
designation of Business Park (BP) by creating a Planned
Development Overlay (PDO) zone with defined uses and
development restrictions.
A proposal to develop a 244 unit senior housing complex with
two and three story apartment buildings on an 8.3 acre site.
This will be a permitted use under the PDO zone. Although the
density for the apartments is at the maximum 30. units per acre
the actual population will be less intensive than regular
apartments because each unit is likely to house only one or two
people.
The project is separated from single family homes to the north
and west by the San Gertrudis Creek (channeled), by Nicolas
Road and Chaparral High School to the south, and vacant
commercial land in Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan to the east.
Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside County Health
Department, Temecula Police Departmerit, Eastern MUnicipal
Water District, Rancho California Water District, Southern
California Gas Company, Southern California Edison Company,
General Telephone Company, and Riverside Transit Agency
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
47
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the folldwing pages.
X
X
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological, Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
X
X
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find' that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one
effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on
attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
May 13, 1999
Signature. Date:
Thomas K. Thornsley
For,: The City of Temecula
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 48
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
1.a.
1.c.
1.e.
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land
uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including low-income or minority
community)?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
1 .a., C.
The Zoning Amendment (ZA) is a proposal, that upon approval, creates a specialized Zoning Designation
overlaying the current Business Park (BP) zoning with Planned Development Overlay (PDO). The PDO
is confined within the City's Development Code. The impact of the ZA is e~pected to be less than
significant because the uses being permitted under the PDO will be equal to or less intensive than most
of those currently allowed under BP. The mix of uses proposed will be compatible the other commercial
designations in the vicinity with senior housing as a permitted use under the PDO.. The Development Plan
for senior apartments is also compatible with the residential uses in the surrounding area. As a
consequence, the impacts associated with this Development Plan are expected to be less than significant.
1.b
It is not anticipated that the ZA will conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The environmental impact of the proposed ZA and the proposed
Development Plan are expected to be less than significantbecause the PDO includes use comparable with
Business Park zoning and they are equal or less intensive uses. Impacts from all General Plan Land Use
Designations were originally analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report for (EIR) the General Plan.
Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and
how the land uses would impact their particular agency. All agencies with jurisdiction over these projects
are now being given the opportunity to comment on them at this time. It is anticipated that they will make
the appropriate comments as to how the ZA and Development Plan relate to their specific environmental
plans or polices. The Development Plan site has been previously graded and services have been
extended into the area. There will be limited, if any environmental effects on environmental plans or
polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the Development Plan.' No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
1.e
Neither the ZA nor the Development Plan will disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community). It will provide for a specific housing need in the
community. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 49
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
2.a.
2.c.
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (Source 1, Page 2-23)
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped .area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
X
X
X
Comments:
2.a.
The ZA will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The Development Plan
will result in the construction of senior apartments. It is likely that this project will bdng some people to the
City that currently live elsewhere, while some people will relocate within the City. The residential land uses
in the City have maintained their target densities j~s the have developed. Although this site has a high
potential density, the average occupancy for each apartment will be one or two persons. The proposed
development will not be a significant contributor to population growth that would cumulatively exceed
official regional or local population projections. Therefore, less that significant effects are anticipated as
a result of this project.
2.b.
2.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly.
The Development Plan may cause some people to relocate to Temecula, but will also accommodate the
needs of existing residents (see 2.a.). Therefore, the Development Plan will not induce substantial growth
in the area, and no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
The ZA will not effect exiting housing. The Development Plan proposes senior.housing which will expand
the existing housing inventory within the city. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 50
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
Expose people to potential impacts involving?
3.a.
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
3.e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
Fault rupture? (Source 1, FigUre 7-1, Page 7-6 )
Seismic ground shaking?
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
Landslides or mudflows? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page
7-8)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions form excavation, grading or fill?
Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page
7-8)
Expansive soils?
Unique geologic or physical features?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
3.b.,f.,
The ZA will not have an effect but the proposed Development Plan may expose people to some potentially
significant impacts involving seismic ground shaking and to erosion, changes in topography or unstable
soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill. The project site is located in Southern California, an area
that is seismically active, and any potential impacts are mitigated through building construction that is
consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. In addition, this site will require fill to raise the site in
compliance with the Riverside County Flood Control District. Preliminary soil reports have been submitted
and reviewed as part of the application submittal and recommendations contained in this report will be
used to determine appropriate conditions of approval. The soils reports will also contain recommendations
for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially Significant impacts from seismic
ground shaking, erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or
fill. After mitigation measures are performed, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
3.c.,g.
The ZA and the Development Plan site is located within an area delineated as a liquefaction/subsidence
hazard zone. Potentially significant impacts associated with the development of this site will be mitigated
through building construction, which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. In addition,
preliminary soil reports have been submitted and reviewed as part of the application submittal and
recommendations contained in this report will be used to determine appropriate conditions of approval prior
to the issuance of grading permits. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will be
utilized in the development of this site, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from
liquefaction. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of
this project.
3.d.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The
project is not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. No impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 51
3.e.
3.h.
3.i.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final
Environmental Impact for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or
mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
This site should not be subject to expansive soils. Soils test in the general area have not indicated that
the conditions or mineral elements exist that create and/or cause there to be problems with, expansive
soils. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. No unique geol;3gic features Or physical
features exist on the site. No impacts are anticipated as a. result of this .project.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact
No Impact
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
4.a.
4.b.
4.c.
4.d.
4.e.
4.f.
4.g.
4.h.
4.i.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns: or the
rate and mount of surface runoff?
Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? (Source 1, Figure 7-3,
Page 7-10; Figure 7-4, Page 7-12 and Source 5)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)?
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, 'either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater.
Otherwise available for public water supplies? (Source
2, Page 263)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
4.a.
This land ZA will not have an effect, however, the proposed Development Plan of the site will result in
changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff. While absorption
rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts will ultimately be mitigated through site design.
Drainage conveyances will be required at the time that a development proposal is proposed to safely and
adequately handle runoff that is created. The impact as a result of this project will be less than significant,
and mitigated to a level less than significant.
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 52
4.b.
4.c.
4.d. ,e.
This ZA will not expose people to water related hazards. The site is located in Zone A of the Temecula
Creek floodplain (areas within the 100-year floodplain) as identified by Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel
No. 060742-0005-B (November 20, 1996). As a consequence the proposed Development Plan will be
required to comply with Riverside County Flood Control measures to mitigate the development from
potential flooding hazards. This site is also located within a dam inundation area as identified in the City
of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. Impacts will be mitigated by utilizing
existing emergency response systems and by assudng that these systems continue to maintain adequate
service provision as the City develops. Impacts associated with this project with respect to the threat of
flooding can be mitigated to levels that will be less than significant.
The ZA does not effect discharge into surface waters. The Development Plan for this site may have a
potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and alteration of surface water quality. Prior
to issuance of a grading permit for a development proposal on this site, the developer will be required to
comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from
the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent
has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any
potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant as a result of the development of this site.
This ZA will not effect the amounts of surface water in any water bodies nor changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water movements. The ultimate development of the site; however, may have a less
than significant impact in changes to the amount of surface water in any water body or impact currents,
or impact the course or direction of water movements. Consequently any impact as a result of the change
in land use designations is considered less than significant.
The ZA will not have any effects on ground water. The ultimate development of the site will have a less
than significant impact with respect to the change in the quantity and quality of ground waters.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significent
Impact Incorporated Impact
No Impact
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
5.a.
5.b.
5.c.
5.d.
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (Source 3,
Page 6-11, Table 6-2)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
Create objectionable odors?
X
X
X
X
Comments:
5.a
The proposed ZA will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality
violation because the potential uses of the site are .similar to uses considered in the EIR for the City's
General Plan. The proposed Development Plan will not violate nor contribute to existing or projected air
quality violations as defined by the AQMD Standards (ref. Source 3, Table 6-2) As a consequence no
.impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 53
5.b.,d.
5.c.
The ZA. will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants or objectionable odors. There is a sensitive
receptor, Chaparral High School, adjacent to the Development Plan site. The development of this site may
create dust and/or objectionable odor during the grading and construction phas. e of the project. These
impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant over the long term. No other odors are
anticipated once the project is built and occupied. The impact as a result of this project will be less than
significant.
Neither the proposed ZA nor the proposed
temperature, or cause any change in climate.
Development Plan will alter air-movement, moisture or
No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact
No Impact
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
6.a.
6.b.
6.c.
6.d.
6.e.
6.f.
Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses)?
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Source
4, Table 17.24.040, Pg. 125)
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
6.a.
The changes in the allowed land uses for the PDO/ZA are of a similar nature to the uses currently allowed
and will not have an additional impacts on traffic. The development of the site will add new traffic to the
area because the site is currently vacant. However, the EIR has already addressed the anticipated traffic
volumes generated by the development of this property under Business Park uses. Based on the trip
generation data of the General Plans Circulation Element and the project's traffic report the proposed
senior housing Development Plan has nearly half the daily trip rates of the current land uses permitted
under the Business Park designation. This location also provides the residents with convenient access to
community amenities with out the need to drive. Therefore, this project will create less traffic congestion
that previous anticipated in the Circulation Element and the EIR for the General Plan. It is anticipated that
the senior housing project will contribute a tow to three percent (2-3%) increase in existing volumes during
the AM peak hour and PM peak hour time frames to the intersections of Winchester Road and Nicolas
Road. The applicant will be required to pay traffic signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as
conditions of approval for the project. After mitigation measures are performed and development impact
fees paid, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 54
6.b.
6.c.
6.6.
6.f.
6.g.
The ZA will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The Development Plan is designed the
site to current City standards and does not propose any hazards to safety from design features. There
will be three points of ingress and egress to the property to accommodate access and avoid increase traffic
conflicts. The internal circulation does not propose and hazards in its design.. Because of the design
features contained within the project design, there will be less than significant impacts as a result of this
project.
The-ZA and the Development Plan will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses. This project is designed to current City standards and has three points of entry providing adequate
emergency access. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists.
Hazards or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part of the project. No impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks). The development of the site will provide parking and
storage for bicycles. A condition of approval of the project requires that a bus turnout be provided on
Winchester Road as requested by the Riverside Transit Authority. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project,
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none
exists currently in the immediate proximity of the project. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R :\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 55
Issues and Supporting Infom'mtion Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
7.a.
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals .
and birds)? (Source 1, Pg. 5-15, Figure 5-3 & Source 4)
X
7.b.
7.c.
7.d.
7.e.
Locally designated species (e.g.heritage trees)? (Source
1 Pg. 5-15, Figure 5-3)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)?
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
X
X
Comments:
7.a.
The project site for the ZA and the Development Plan does not lie within in an area designated by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service as potential habitat for any Federally listed endangered species. This site is with
in the urbanized area of the city and has been continuously disced for weed abatement and has little
vegetation left to provide for potential habitat. As a result, no impacts are anticipated at this time.
7.b.-e. The ZA has no effect on these biological resources and the Development Plan site is currently disturbed
and undeveloped. There are no locally designated communities, wetland habitat areas, or wildlife corridors
on or around the site. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with the proposed development of this site.
R:~STAFFRP'D,511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 56
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:.
8.a.
8.c.
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State?
X
X
X
Comments:
8,a.
Neither the ZA nor the Development Plan will impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans. The Development Plan will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be
consistent with these applicable laws. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b.
The ZA will not effect non-renewable resources and the Development Plan will result in a less than
significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient 'manner. While there
will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable
resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent
depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these
impacts are not seen as significant.
8.c.
The ZA does not effect mineral resources and the Development Plan will not result in the loss .of availability
of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No
known. mineral resource that 'would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are
located at this project site. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 57
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
9.a.
9.b.
9.c.
9.d.
9.e.
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not. limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemical or radiation)?
Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, Or trees?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
9.a.
The ZA and the DeVelopment Plan will not result in an impact due to dsk of explosion, or the release of'any
hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the
request. Development must receive clearance from the Department of Environmental Health prior to any
plan check submittal and must also receive clearance from the Fire Department prior to the issuance of
a building permit. This applies to storage and use of hazardous materials. No impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
9.b.
9.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency
evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area, which could impact an emergency response
plan. The Development Plan proposes to. take access from maintained streets and will therefore not
impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in the creation of any health. hazard 'or potential health
hazard. The Development Plan will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the
plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these
applicable laws. Reference response 9.a. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards.
No health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
9.6.
ZA and the Development Plan will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees. The project site is in an area of existing uses and proposed commercial uses. The project
is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 58
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:.
8.c.
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State?
X
X
Commerlts:
8.a.
Neither the ZA nor the Development Plan will impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans. The Development Plan will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be
consistent with these applicable laws. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b.
The ZA will not effect non-renewable resources and the Development Plan will result in a less than
significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient 'manner. While there
will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable
resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent
depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these
impacts are not seen as significant.
8.c.
The ZA does not effect mineral resources and the Development Plan will not result in the lossof availability
of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No
known mineral resource that 'would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are
located at this project site. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 57
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
9.a.
9.b.
9.c.
9.d.
9.e.
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not. limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemical or radiation)?'
Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with ~ammable brush,
grass, Or trees?
'X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
9.a.
The ZA and the DeVelopment Plan will not result in an impact due to dsk of explosion, or the release of'any
hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the
request. Development must receive clearance from the Department of Environmental Health prior to any
plan check submittal and must also receive clearance from the Fire Department prior to the issuance of
a building permit. This applies to storage and use of hazardous materials. No impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
9.b.
9.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency
evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area, which could impact an emergency response
plan. The Development Plan proposes to take access from maintained streets and will therefore not
impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in the creation of any health. hazard'or potential health
hazard. The Development Plan will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the
plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these
applicable laws. Reference response 9.a. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards.
No health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
9.e.
ZA and the Development Plan will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush,
grass, or trees. The project site is in an area of existing uses and proposed commercial uses. The project
is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 58
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
10. NOISE. Would the .proposal result in: ..
1 o.a. Increase in existing noise levels? (Source 1, page 8-9)
lO.b.
Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Source 1,
Figure 8-5)
X
Comments:
10.a.
The ZA will not have an effect on noise and Development Plan will result in a less than significant increase
to existing noise levels. The site is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in
increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long
run. Long-term noise generated by this Development Plan would be similar to existing and proposed uses
in the area. No significant noise impacts are anticipated as a result of this project in either the short or
long-term.
10.b.
The ZA will not expose people to severe noise levels. However, the Development Plan site is adjacent to
State Highway 79, (Winchester Road), which is designated on the City's General Plan as an access
restricted six-lane urban arterial roadway. Ambient noise levels 100 feet from centerline are 70.2 to 75.2
CNEL for Highway 79. This Development Plan will require an acoustical survey for noise mitigation. Site
design and building methods can mitigate the ambient ·noise to acceptable levels. The development of this
project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase (short-term).
Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is
considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of
noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. There will be no long-term
exposure of people to noise. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R :\STAF FRPT%511-512pa98 pc2a, doc 59
11.
'11.a.
11.b.
11.c.
11.d.
i11.e.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Other governmental services?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
11.a.,
b.
ZA and the Development Plan will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered fire or police protection. The Development Plan may consolidate seniors who are more likely to
need emergency services but will only incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection. The
development of this project will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision from these
entities· through Development Impact Fees and increase property taxes. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
11.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will have no impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school
facilities. The Development Plan is for senior housing and this segment of the population does not
generally generate a need for school. As a result of this project will not cause significant numbers of
people requiring schools to relocate within or to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need
for new or altered school facilities. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11.d.
The ZA and the Development Plan will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public
facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax, which is
distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of CalifOrnia. Impacts to current and future needs for..
maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be incremental, however, they will not be
considered significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11 .e. The ZA and the Development Plan will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc . 60
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS: Would the proposal
Result in a need for new systems or supplies,. or substantial
Alterations to the following utilities:
12.a.
12.b.
12.c.
12.d.
12.e.
12.f.
12.g.
Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
Sewer or septic tanks? (Source 2, Pgs. 39-40)
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste disposal?
Local or regional water supplies?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
12,a.
The ZA and-the Development Plan will not result. in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.b.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in a need for new systems or. supplies, or substantial
alterations to communication systems (reference response No. 12.a. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.d.
12.e.
The ZA and the Development.Plan will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the Development Plan will have an
incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's
General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is
required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed
General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." It is anticipated that the
proposal to change the designation from Office to Commercial, and the limited nature of future
development under this designation, would not significantly increase the demand for systems or supplies.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The ZA and the Development Plan will result i'n a less than significant need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to storm water drainage. The Development Plan will need to provide some
additional on-site drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition of approval for
the project and will tie into the existing system. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
12.f.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to
solid waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can
be mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs that are implemented
by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 61
12.g.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact
No Impact
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
13.a.
13.b.
13.c.
Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic affect?
Create light or glare?
X
X
X
Comments:
13.a.
The ZA and the Development Plan will-not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not
located in an area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated scenic
highways. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The
Development Plan consists of multiple apartment building in an area of mixed uses and aesthetic styling.
These buildings are consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and provide a well articulated design.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will have a less than a significant impact from light and glare. The
Development Plan will produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new
light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. The
Development Plan will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light
Pollution). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 62
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
14.a.
14.~..
14.c.
14.d.
14.e.
Disturb paleontological resources? (Source 2, Fig. 15,
Pg. 70)
Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 2, Fig. 14,
Pg. 67)
Affect historical resources?
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
14.c.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not have an impact on historical resources. The site has been
previously graded and resources would have been disturbed at that time. No historic resources exist at
the site or are proximate to the site. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.d.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not have the potential to cause a physical change that would affect
unique ethnic cultural values. Reference response 14.c. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
14.e.
The ZA and the Development Plan will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area. No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 63
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
15.a.
15.b.
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
X
X
Comments:
15.a., b.
The ZA and the Development Plan is a residential facility that will cause some people to relocate within
or to the City of Temecula. However, this will cause only an incremental impact or increase in demand
for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities because the Development Plan for the
senior housing will provide some amenities for the tenants. Although this prdject will provide some
recreational amenities they are required to contribute park mitigation fees. For the amenities provided
this project will therefore be conditioned to pay an adjusted rate of that fee.' The same is true for the
quality or quantity of existing recreational resources for opportunities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 64
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
16.a.
16.b.
16,c.
16.d.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, tO the disadvantage of long-term,-environmental
goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? CCumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
16.a-d No impacts are anticipated as a result of this ZA and the Development Plan.
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
X
X
X
X
EARLIER ANALYSES. None
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 65
SOURCES
2.
3.
4.
City of Temecula General Plan.
City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
South Coast Air Quali.ty Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
U.S: Fish and Wildlife Service Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Habitat Map (compiled by the Riverside
County Transportation and Land Management Agency [TLMA] GIS Division.- dated June 4, 1998)
Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel No. 060742-0005-B (November 20, 1996)
.Traffic Impact Analysis, The Fountains Senior Housing, Prepared by: Linscott, Lay, & Greenspan dated
December 21, 1998
Traffic Impact Analysis, The Fountains Senior Housing, Prepared by: Linscott, I'ay, & Greenspan dated
April 21, 1999
R:\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 pc2a,doc 66
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:~,STAFFRP'T'~I 1-512pa98 pc2a.doc 67
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA98-0511 and PA98-0512
(Zoning Amendment and Development Plan for Senior Housing)
Geoloqic Problems
General Impact:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Mitigation Measures:
Planting of slopes and undeveloped portions consistent with
Ordinance No. 457.
Specific Processes:
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Department
of Public Works.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or urlstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the
Development Code.
Submit landscape plans that include planting of slopes and
undeveloped portions of the site to the Planning Department
for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils
or earthquake hazards.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial
grading plan check. Building. pads shall be certified by a
registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building permits.
Depai'tment of Public Works and Building & Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 68
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure-of people or property to seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils
or earthquake hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the
Uniform Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety Department
for approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
Water
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage
patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from' site so that it will not
negatively impact adjacent properties, including drainage
conveyances, have been incorporated into site design and will
be 'included on the grading plans.
Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of Public
Works for approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to water related h~azards
such as flooding.
Comply with the recommendations of County Flood Control
for flood proofing the building by raising the finish floor one
foot above the stated flood level.
The applicant shall modify the grading plan and comply with
the building standards.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and building permit.
Department of Public Works and building and Safety.
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 69
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Transportation/Circulation
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with
City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance with the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination SyStem (NPDES)
requirements. "
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional
Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and
approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fees, which contribute to road
improvements and traffic signal installations.
Pay fees as computed by the Building Department.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Department of Public Works.
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee.
Pay pro-rata share for traffic impacts to be determined by the
Director of Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRP~511-512pa98 pc2a,doc 70
Bioloaical Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and
birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo
Rat habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
An incremental effect upon and a need for new/altered
governmental services regarding fire protection. The project
will incrementally increase the need for fire protection;
however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of
service provision.
Payment of Development Impact Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Riverside County Fire
Department.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
An incremental effect upon and a need for new/altered schools.
No significant impacts are anticipated.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified
School District.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley Unified
School District.
R:\STAFFRPTL511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 71
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
'Responsible MonitOring Party:
Aesthetics
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
An incremental effect upon and a need for maintenance of
public facilities, including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for mad improvements,
traffic impacts, and public facilities.
Pay fees computed by the Department of Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.-
Department of Public Works.
The creation of new light sources will result in increased light
and glare that could affect the Palomar Observatory,
Use lighting techniques that are consistent. with Ordinance No,
655,
Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for
approval,
Prior to the issuance of a building permit,
Building & Safety Department,
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 72
ATTACHMENT NO~ 5
CORRESPONDENCE
R:%STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 73
Phone (619) $42-0086'
WM 11 Partners, LP
2398 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110
To: City of Temecula Planning Commission
Mayl4, 1999
From: Peter Sterling, Manager
Senior Housing Project/Winchester & Nicholas
PA 980512 and 980511
We are the current owners of the subject property where Pacific Gulf Properties is proposing to
build a senior housing complex. We strongly support this project for a number of reasons.
When we first approached the City of Temecula Planning Director and Staff regarding the most
appropriate use of the property, we were all perplexed. The existing BP zoning and permitted
uses were not ideal for many reasons, especially traffic next to the high school. In the course of
many discussions (and. given the need in the marketplace) we concluded that a seniors housing
use would be the most isuitable and have the least impact on the high school and surrounding
neighbors. Thus, it was out of careful consideration and discussions with the City that we
approached Pacific Gulf Properties.
If the senior housing use i~ not permitted, we will either develop the property ourselves or sell it
to another developer. in today's market, the most likely use will be smaller industrial/
manufacturing buildings under 20,000 SF. The existing BP Zone permits uses under 20,000 SF
for the following purposes:
"Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling,
shipping, truck services, and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of un-
refined, raw or semi-refined products requiring further processing or manufacturing..."
The existing BP Zone also permits the following without a building size limitation:
"Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods
within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, fumiture, art objects,
clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembly, and repair processes which do not
involve frequent truck traffic."
Our preliminary plans indicate a BP Zone project size of between 140,000 SF and 190,000 SF. In
addition to truck docks and truck doors, we would have employee and visitor park!ng in excess
of 500 spaces.
Page I of 2
Any of these uses will involve significant trucking and many more cars. The hours of operation
for these industrial/manufacturing uses will conflict with the 7:00 a.m. to 7:45 a.m. school traffic.
Instead of a few seniors in cars, we will have to deal with many employees coming to work and
truck deliveries and pick-up. In addition, the concrete tilt-up construction with flat roofs and roo.f
equipment will not provide an attractive view for the neighbors above.
I sincerely hope that you will conclude, as we did, that the most benign and least intrusive use for
this site is a seniors housing complex. Pacific Gulf has, sincerely and in good faith, tried to
accommodate your suggestions and concerns from the last meeting. They will be good
neighbors.
Lastly, looking at the seniors for a moment, they will be within walking distance from the new
Ralphs/Rite-Aid shopping center at Marrgarita and Winchester as well as the Regional Mall.
They will be able to make use of the walkway along the Santa Gemdis Creek to go to and from
stopping and to just stroll along this footpath.
Pacific Gulfs revised application for a rezone to PDO (Planned Development Overlay) is the
right approach to achieve a quality senior housing project, which is the right use for this parcel.
We thank you for your consideration.
Thank you,
WM 11 Partners
SPT Holdings LLC, General Partner
Peter Sterling
M~~ger .
Manager
Page 2 of 2
ARCHITECT AIA
IS375 Barrenca Pkwy.
Suite FIOT
Irvine
California
92618-2207
949 450 1088
949 450 1072 fax
Transmittal
.City of Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033
Attn: Thomas Thornsley
Re: The Fountains at Temecula
Sent via: Fed 'X'
May 24, 1999
Thomas,
Enclosed with this letter are eleven folded copies of the revised preliminary design
package for The Fountains. These plans are for your distribution to the various
agencies and commissioners. The architectural site plan and landscape plan have
been changed to add the new driveway at Winchester. All other sheets within this set
are unchanged.
I recently sent you a letter which addresses the concerns of one of the Planning
Commissioners and the changes we have made to the design of the project. Please
include a copy of this response in your packages that are sent to the commissioners.
I also will be sending you eleven reduced copies of a computer generated rendering
.that we have had prepar. ed. These will be sent in overnight delivery tomorrow.
Please include one of these in each of the commissioner's packages.
This rendering will clearly show the quality that Pacific Gulf Properties is bringing to
this project and I trust that it will help communicate the design intent to the
commissioners. We will have an enlarged version of this rendering at the Planning
Commission Meeting as well as a 'bird's eye view" rendering.
I believe this addresses all of the outstanding concerns on this project.
if you need any additional information or if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
James Mickartz
cc: file, Curt Miller
Please call me
ARCHITECT AIA
15375 hrrmucu Pkwy.
Suite 1:101
Irviue
Celiferuia
'92618-2207
949 450 1088
949 450 1072 fax
City of Temecula Planning Department
43200 Businsee Park Drive
Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033
Attn: Thomas Thornsley
Re: The Fountains at Temecula
April 21, 1999
Thomas,
We have received the comments from one of the planning commissionel that you sent
to our office. The following are our response to these comments.
m
Consider relocating the project to another area of the site.
We have considered all areas of this property in the development of this project.
It is our belief that the site plan we have developed is the best use for the
property that is adjacent to the high school. The traffic generated by a senior
apartment project is far less than traffic generated by other potential uses.,
especially now that we have provided three driveway alternatives for our
residents. office uses. The traffic report that we are submitting will identify the
greater impact by other poten~al uses.
Landscape median and texture paving.
The' preliminary landscape plan has shown the use of interlocking textured
concrete pavers at the project entry. We have chosen to not provide a median
at this drive approach because of the increased widths that are required by .t, he
fire department and the potential for traffic congestion at this point.
Show and identify monumnet signs
The low level monument signs have been shown on the site plan.
and approval for these signs will be under a separate sign permit.
The design
4. Provide on site shuttle van parking and loading areas
We have revised the site plan to accommodate two shuttle van parking spaces
near the entry. The Entrance Lobby is within 40 feet of these spaces and we
feel it is better for our residents to wait for the shuttle buses inside the building
in a heated or air conditioned space, rather than waiting outdoors.
5. Provide a detail of stucco trim around the window
Please refer to the enlarged elevation on sheet #10 of this package. You will see
The Fountains at Temecula
April 21, 1999
Page Two
that it is our intention to have the windows attain a recessed appearance by
furring the walls adjacent to the windows. We will provide a plaster screed
around the windows to add detail definition. 7'he computer generated rendering
that we will have at the Planning Commission Meeting will help illustrate this
concept,
The sandstone veneer should be used for a more complete
craftsman style.
The use of this simulated stone veneer is a costly item. A project of this type
is directed at senior citizens, most of which are on fixed incomes. We have to be
very sensitive to the budget on a project like this for this reason. It is our belief
that extra design enhancements are best to be applied to other elements in the
project L e. increased landscaping, benches, fountains, etc.
This project makes reference to a California craftsman style .through the use of
roof mateials, roof shapes and pitch as well as the overhangs and architectural
detailing. We have designed this project to be as true as it possibly can to this
style, given the nature of the buildings.
The "blank" end walls need more architectural improvements
It is our belief that the end walls are not "blank" We have added a furred base
to all of these conditions as well as stone veneer at the entrances, roof
overhangs for shadow relief and architectural brackets. The landscape is
enhanced at all locations, including these locations. There is no possiblity for '
additional .windows at these walls due to the limited furniture space that is
available within these Units. The three dimensional design of these areas will
be clearly illustrated in the computer generated rendering that we will have
available at the Planning Commission Meeting..
The carports need exposed wood rafter Mils.
We have submitted the proposed design of the carports that we would like to
use for this project. These are the "Rustic Port" design by Baja Carports. These
carports do have rafter tails as shown in the previously submitted photographs.
As I discussed at the Planning Commission hearing, it is our belief that it is better
to not call attention to carports and let the main buildings provide the architectual
interest in the project.
The use of tile roofs on carports is extremely cost prohibitive due to the structural
seismic requirements imposed by the added weight of roof tiles.
&
Identify the city approved street trees.
We have requested that the city identify the type of st½eet trees that should be
The Fountains at Temecula
APril 21, 1999
Page Three
used along Winchester. There is a discrepency between the street trees to the
north and to the south. We are willing to install whatever trees the city
determines need to be installed.
10.
Change the sycamore trees to a London plane tree.
We have changed the sycamores to London plane trees on the revised
preliminary landscape plan.
I hope this letter and the revised site plan addresses these concerns, We will be able
to discuss these issues with the Planning Commision when we meet in May.
Please call me if you have .any questions
cc: file, Curt Miller
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
EXHIBITS
R:~STAFFRP'I'~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc 74
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment) and PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
R:\STAFFRPT%511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - BP (BUSINESS PARK)
M
M
· LM-
LM
LM
NC
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - BP (BUSINESS PARK)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
ZONING MAP
GENERAL PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-05i2 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
SITE PLAN
R: \STAFFRPT\511-512pa98 pc.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
J
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
SITE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a,doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
East Elevation from Winclzester Road
Partial North Elevation from tire Pool Area
Partial South Elevation from Nicolas Road
~.Z..!:.~.,~?I Bailding One Exterior Elevations
'5:'.7.(77.'~' The Fountains at Temecula
:::':..':.';. Pacific Gulf Properties
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
BUILDING ONE ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT\511-512pa98 pc.doe
CITY OF TEMECULA
West Elevation
East Elevation
South Elevation from Nicolas Road
N o r t h E I e v a t i o n
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
BUILDING TWO ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT\511-512pa98 pc.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
North Elevation
South Elevation Similar
.
North Elevation
West Elevation East Elevation
Building Three Exterit~r Elevations
The Fountains at Temecula
Pacific Gul.[ Properties.
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
R:\STAFFRPT~I 1-512pa98 pc.doc
BUILDING THREE ELEVATIONS
CITY OF TEMECULA
North Elevation
South Elevation Similar
West Elevation
East Elevation
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -June 2, 1999
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc.doc
BUILDING FOUR ELEVATIONS
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINCHESTER ROAD
P__~AN' LEGEND -~-E~
~ Si= ~,,.-~,,
GROUND COVE~
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\511-5 12pa98 pc .doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-O512. (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT G
PLA;NNING COMMISSION DATE- June 2, 1999
FLOOR PLANS
R:\STAFFRPTX511-512pa98 pc.doe
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 2, 1999
RENDERING
R:\STAFFRPT~511-512pa98 pc2a.doc
ATTACHMENT 5
MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 1999, PLANNING COMMISSION
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
37
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 17, 1999
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday March 17, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Naggar.
X:)(:X
At this time, City Clerk Jones duly swore
in the newly re-appointed Planning Commissioner,
Linda Fahey.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Fahey, Naggar, *Soltysiak, Webster, and
Chairman Guerdero.
Absent:
None.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Attorney Cudey,
Senior Planner Fagan,
Assistant Planner Anders,
Project Planner Thornsley, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
*(Commissioner Soltysiak ardved at 6:35 P.M.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of AQenda
Commissioner Webster recommended agendizing the issue of appointing a Vice-Chairman for
the Planning Commission at a future meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Commissioner Fahey who abstained and Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
2. Approval of Minutes-February 11, 1999
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. Plannin.~ Application No. PA98-0517 (Development Plan)
Request to design, construct and operate a 32,000 square foot office, warehouse
and manufacturing building on two parcels (0.94acresiparcel) totaling 1.88 acres.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
By way of overheads and color renderings, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report
(of record); for Commissioner Naggar, noted that the loading zone would be screened with
landscaping, specifying the dimensions of the landscape buffer, further clarified the location of
the chain-linked fencing, relaying the location of the existing, adjacent chain-linked fencing; and
for Commissioner Fahey, clarified the rationale for the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) exemption, relaying that the proposed project was consistent with the General Plan.
Mr. Allan Young, the applicant, was available for questions.
Mr. Kenneth Keane, representing the applicant, specified, for Commissioner Naggar, that the
material of the canopy would be a painted dark gray metal, coordinating with the color of the
building; presented the proposed building's design and articulation; and clarified the location of
the loading zone, specifying the location of the slope, the landscape provisions, and the
adjacent undeveloped property.
Mr. Lon Brusegard, representing the applicant, relayed, for Commissioner Fahey, that the
company currently employees 27 people, proposes to increase employment to 30 at the time of
relocation, and forecasted the employment rate to be at 35 within a year; noted the hours of
operation from 7:00 A M. to 3:30 P.M., with the potential of an extension of operating hours after
relocation; and further clarified, with regard to Commissioner Naggar's comments, the
specifications of the chain-linked fencing, relaying that the slatting material would be plastic;
noted the location of the landscape buffer, relaying the plan to install 15-gallon pine trees to
buffer the view of the loading area; and noted that the aforementioned area of discussion is
located adjacent to an undeveloped parcel.
Commissioner Naggar recommended that the chain-linked fence be replaced with a wrought
iron fence, and that additional articulation be added on the building's frontage (i.e., sandblasting
or textudng) for the provision of additional visual interest.
Assistant Planner Anders reiterated the location of the existing chain-linked fencing on the
adjacent property; and specified the difference between wood slats and plastic slats with regard
to maintenance and visual appearance.
The applicant further relayed that due to the location, the proposed fencing would not be visible
from the street; and specified the building design, relaying the architectural accents and
articulation, noting that he was not in favor of adding additional articulation to the building's
frontage, specifically sandblasting.
Commissioner Fahey relayed that due to staffs clarification, she was not opposed to this
particular project's chain-linked fencing.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved .to close the public headng; adopt Resolution No. 99-
008 approving Planning Application No. PA98o0517 based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and adopt a
Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA98-0517 per the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0517
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF A TWO-STORY, 32,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE,
WAREHOUSE AND MANUFACTURING BUILDING ON TWO PARCELS
TOTALING 1.88 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RIO NEDO,
APPROXIMATELY 1300 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
TIERRA ALTA WAY AND RIO NEDO AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 909-290-043 AND 909-290-044.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
4. Plannin.cl Application No. PA98-0511 (General Plan Amendment and Zone Chan.qe)
Request to Change the General Plan Land Use designation from Business Park
(BP) to Professional Office (PO) and change the Zoning designation from
Business Park (BP) to Professional Office (PO) for a proposed development of a
244 unit senior's only apartment complex.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
It was noted that Commissioner Soltysiak arrived at the meeting at 6:35 P.M.
By way of overheads, Project Planner Thomsley presented the staff report (per agenda
material); highlighted architecture, access, parking, and landscaping, relaying that thirty-five
percent (35%) of the site would be landscaped; for the record, noted that staff had received five
letters (four pdor to the headng) in opposition to the project from adjacent property owners,
relaying that the pdmary concern expressed was the obstruction of their view; presented a line-
of-sight drawing, clarifying that due to the change in elevations at the site, the proposed project
would not impede the view of the adjacent neighbors; relayed that staff is requesting that the
Conditions of Approval be modified to reflect a revision in the Development Impact Fee category
from Multi-family to Professiona/Office; and noted that staff recommends the addition of an
additional Condition of Approval (COA), regarding the permitted use of the property (read into
the record, as follows: This approval is issued and granted to "Senior Citizen Housing
Development" as the same is defined in the California Civil Code. No other residential use.
except as permitted by California Civil Code 51.2, 51.3. and 51.4 in relation to Senior Citizen
Housing Development is authotfzed or permitted to occur by or through this approval. Any other
residential use will require further review and action under the laws of the City of Temecula.)
For Commissioner Naggar, Project Planner Thomsley clarified that while the permitted use of
the amended zoning map would allow both types of facilities, that this particular project would
be for the provision of a Senior Housing Fadlity, and not for congregate care; relayed that while
there is a need in the City of Temecula for this type of use, that residents of this particular
project could potentially come from outside areas; specified the potential generated tdp counts,
as follows: Business Park Zoning (as currently zoned) would generate 180 tdps a day, and
Senior Housing would generate 129 tdps a day; and clarified that the projecrs proposed density
would not exceed the permitted high-density residential use, referencing the Development Code
(under Residential Section, under permitted uses for Senior Citizen Housing, page 39)
For Commissioner Naggar, Attomey Cudey relayed that there were two issues before the
Commission, as follows: 1 ) a legislative Land Use decision to amend the Zone Designation and
the General Plan, as well as, 2) the proposed Development Plan; noted that the law has made
provision for Senior Citizen facilities, designed to meet the specific needs of Seniors, enabling
those facilities to limit the residential occupancy to qualifying residents of a specific age (55
years or older), relaying that this particular project was designed as a Senior Citizen facility,
limiting its occupancy to qualifying senior citizens (age 55 years or older); and cited Civil Cede
Sections 51.2, 51.3, and 51.4, relaying the criteda for the aforementioned facility, specifying the
design of the use would be for the provision of accommodating the needs of senior citizens.
In response to Commissioner Fahey's querying, Deputy Director of Parks advised that the
current proposed project would have a less than significant impact upon traffic due to this type
of facility pdmadly not utilizing peak hour access; and noted that if this particular proposed
Development Plan did not go forward, while the amended Zone Designation changed the zoning
from Business Park (BP) to Professional Office (PO), and at a future point in time was fully
developed under permitted uses for Professional Office (PO) Zoning, the uses would have a
greater traffic impact, noting that there has been no study to determine precisely what the traffic
impact would be, or if the Level of Service (LOS) would be affected.
For Commissioner Fahey, Project Planner Thomsley relayed the uses permitted under Business
Park (BP) Zoning, and Professional Office (PO) Zoning, noting that PO Zoning permits a less
intensive use; advised what while this particular project would generate less traffic, the PO
Zoning, generally generates a higher tdp count, specifying that BP Zoning (current zoning)
would generate additional traffic at peak hours, and less activity dudng work hours, while PO
Zoning would generate additional traffic dudng vadous hours of the day; confirmed that if the
project was approved in conjunction with approval of the proposed Zone change, and if at a
future point in time the developer chose not to develop this particular project, the Zone change
could potentially permit a use generating a higher traffic impact; and specified the generation of
trips, as follows: the current Business Park (BP) Zoning would potentially generate 180 trips,
per acre, per day; Professional Office (PO) Zoning would potentially generate 240 trips, per
acre, per day; Senior Housing would potentially generate 129 trips, per acre, per day; and
Multifamily would potentially generate 2f0 tr/ps, per acre, per day; relayed that with regard to
traffic, noise and pollutants, this particular project would generate a less negative impact on the
adjacent neighbors than current permitted uses under the existing Zoning; with regard to the
potential future school stadium project on the adjacent School Distdct property, relayed that the
School District responded two days before the headng on March 15, 1999 via letter
correspondence (per agenda material), stating that a lighted stadium may be built at a future
point in time, advising that the owner of the property be informed of the proposed stadium
project
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the potential
School Districts stadium project would be permitted by the State, not the City, noting that the
potential project would be subject to cooperation with the State's Architect, and would go
through the process of an Environmental Study.
In response to Commissioner Naggads comments with regard to the Environmental Study for
the potential School Distdct's stadium project, Attorney Cudey relayed that the proposed Senior
Housing Facility could conceivably hinder the project.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Project Planner Thomsley relayed that the permitted height of
development permitted for uses under the existing BP Zone would be 50 feet (50'), and under
the proposed PO Zoning would be 75 feet (75').
For Commissioner Webster, Project Planner Thomsley clarified the Environmental Study Report
(of record), regarding the acoustical survey (page 46, Section: Noise.)
For Commissioner Webster, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the 25-foot easement on
the Site Plan was a portion of the property granted to the City of Temecula for provision of a
future transportation corridor, noting it was part of the General Plan.
For Commissioner Webster, regarding Condition No. 60, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks
relayed that the pad for this particular project had been previously graded to raise it to the
existing level, specifying the grading on the adjacent School Distdct property.
For Chairman Guerriero, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified that Nicolas Road is a
pdvate road, noting that the street had been voluntarily built by the developer; relayed that the
road is not maintained by the City; and advised that maintenance of the road easement,
additionally, would involve the School District. Project Planner Thornsley noted that the
developer had created the easement, and granted access dghts to the School District
Chairman Guerdero opened the public headng; and for the record reiterated that staff and the
Commission had received five letters, relaying opposition to the project from the following
individuals: Mr. Jeff Sechler, Mr. Chito Topacio, Mr. Arthur C., Ms. Brenda Bickerstaff, and
William and Cindy Walker.
For the record, an additional letter expressing opposition to the project was submitted to the
clerk from Ms. Patdcia Madano, who spoke at the headng.
Mr. Curtis Miller, the applicant, relayed a bdef history of the Pacific Gulf Properties Inc., relaying
the rationale for the development of active Senior Housing Facilities; noted that a similar project
recently completed in Rancho Santa Margadta (166 units) was 100% leased within a month of
project completion; noted that the bulk of the residents occupying that facility came from the
immediate area or had family located in that area; specified the intedor building design, inclusive
of eight elevators, billlard rooms, activity rooms, creating an environment for provision of the
needs of the residents; for Commissioner Fahey, clarified the rationale for the location of this
type of use, noting the preference to locate adjacent to residential areas, creating a home-like
setting for the occupants; and relayed that the landscape buffedng and circumferential gating
will inhibit cross traffic problems with the adjacent high school.
In response to Commissioner Naggar's comments, Attomey Cudey advised that the Senior
Project could not be conditioned to have the residents of the facility waive their dghts to oppose
the potential school stadium project, relaying that the occupants could be noticed of the
potential stadium project pdor to leasing, providing assurance that the residents would be
cognizant of the School Distdct's plan; and for Commissioner Webster, clarified that the State
Statute sets the minimum age for residents at this type of facility at 55 years.
Mr. James Mickartz, architect representing the applicant, further clarified the buffer between the
project and the adjacent residential property (via photographs), specifying the approximate 40
foot differential in the elevations, noting the distance of over 300 feet between this particular
project and the adjacent property; advised that the project would have no negative effect with
regard to noise, differentiating this particular use from the current permitted uses which could
potentially have a negative effect with regard to noise; further clarified the design of the project;
advised that there are no pdmary peak hours of traffic use by this type of facility, relaying that a
study relayed that at maximum peak this use would generate approximately 11 tdps per hour,
alleviating the concern of the high school's current traffic impact dudng peak hours; and
addressed the querying of the Commissioners, as follows:
For Commissioner Soltysiak, specified the location of the gating on the project; cladfled
the portion of the property to be developed for this particular project; advised that the
intent for the undeveloped portion of the property was for separate ownership at a future
point in time, specifying the design for provision of access on that parcel.
For Commissioner Webster, specified the stucco coloring, additionally, relaying the
articulation at the base of the building and the window detail for provision of additional
visual interest; noted the rationale for the lack of windows and additional articulation on
Building No. 2; and relayed the dimensions of the balconies.
For Commissioner Fahey, noted that the peak traffic generated from the adjacent high
school, specifically between 7:00 A.M. and 7:30 A.M. would not be significantly impacted
by this use, indicating that an alternate permitted use under the current zoning would
potentially generate additional peak hour traffic; and clarified that access to the site was
directed by Caltrans.
· For Commissioner Naggar, relayed that the Fire and Police Departments would direct
the specifications of the address identification.
· For Chairman Guerdero, relayed that the applicant would be agreeable to modify the
secondary access point, for provision of access to the residents; and cladfled the
architectural rationale for the carport design and colodng to detract attention, relaying
that if it was the desire of the Commission, the applicant would be agreeable to adding
additional color, or striping.
Commissioner Fahey commended the architect for his excellent work with regard to the building
design.
Mr. Peter Stealing, the current owner of the project's property, clarified for Commissioner
Webster, that both Rodpaugh and Nicolas Roads have been privately developed, relaying that
there is a joint maintenance agreement with the School District to maintain the aforementioned
roads.
At 8:01 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 8:13 P.M.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project as currently proposed:
Patricia Madano
Chito Topacio
Glen Zdanowski
Rick Fila
Jeff Sechler
39750 Knollridge Ddve
39726 Knollridge Ddve
39614 Knollridge Drive
39680 Knollridge Ddve
39714 Knollridge Ddve
The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition to the project for the following reasons:
ra Location (adjacent to the high school)
Concern for the safety of the seniors ddving in an area heavily impacted with teenage
ddvers and the dsk of additional accidents
Noise
Additional traffic
The potential for non-seniors residing in the facility
Height of the three-story building obstructing the view
Concern regarding development of alternate permitted uses if the Zoning Designation
modification was adopted and this particular project was not developed
ca Concern regarding the lack of community involvement by the project's representatives,
specifically with the adjacent homeowners
~ Location of the air conditioning units
For Commissioner Naggar, Mr. Curtis Miller relayed the rationale for the signage, advertising for
an assisted-care facility use for the undeveloped portion of the property.
Mr. Curtis Miller, addressed the voiced and wdtten concerns of the community, as follows:
VV'td~ regard to traffic and noise, relayed that an alternate permitted use under the current
Business Park Zoning could create a greater negative impact for the adjacent property
owners,
With regard to the height of this particular project, reiterated that the line-of-sight
diagram clarified that due to the change in elevations and the distance from the project
to the adjacent property, that the homeowners would not have their view impeded.
With regard to traffic issues, relayed the potential for additional generation of traffic tdps
dudrig the high school's peak hours would be impacted by approximately ten to f~een
percent of the working residents, occupying the senior facility, specifically by
approximately 24 people; and advised that if there was a significant impact due to the
additional generation of traffic, the applicant was agreeable to placing a reciprocal
easement restriction on the adjacent site for provision of access to Winchester Road, if
approved by Caltrans.
With regard to the issue of safety dudng construction, relayed that dudng construction
there would be on-site fencing, on-site superintendent supervision, and on-site safety
control.
· ,' With regard to property values, noted that this particular project would generate a less
negative impact than alternate permitted Business Park uses.
Commissioner Naggar expressed that although he concurred with the need for this type of
facility in the City of Temecula, recommended that the project not be located at this particular
site, relaying concern with regard to the Zoning Redesignation, as follows: a) incompatibility with
the existing land use (specifically, adjacent to the existing high school), b) the potential of
development at the site with uses being permitted at a height of 75 feet under the amended PO
Zoning, and c) the impact of additional traffic in a currently heavily impacted area; and clarified
that if additional studies were provided (i.e., traffic studies, Environmental Impact Report)
addressing the aforementioned concerns he could support the project.
W'rth regard to the General Plan Amendment, Commissioner Fahey expressed concem with the
potential of uses permitted under the proposed PO Zoning; relayed the rationale for the current
BP Zoning, noting that this particular area would need provision of access to Winchester Road
for adequate circulation, specifying that one allowable access would be potentially permitted by
Caltrans with uses zoned under the current BP Zoning, relaying that access would provide
compatibility with the existing use; advised that the potential for PO permitted uses would not
provide provision for the aforementioned access, rendering a condition whereby use for this
particular parcel generates a negative impact with regard to circulation; with regard to this
particular Development Plan, expressed concern with respect to incompatibility, specifically,
regarding traffic and circulation; relayed that although this particular project was designed well, it
was incompatible on this particular site, due to the following: a) negative environmental impact
with regard to height, and traffic intensity, b) negative impact with regard to ingress and egress,
and c) incompatibility with the adjacent uses, specifically with noise and the potential future
development of the School District; and specified that she could not support the General Plan
Amendment or the proposed Development Plan due the aforementioned concerns.
With regard to the issue of incompatibility with the existing high school use, Commissioner
Soltysiak queded the Commission as to what type of use developed under the current zoning
would be compatible on this particular parcel; and advised that if a potential Business Park use
was proposed there would be a greater negative impact with regard to peak hour traffic.
Chairman Guerdero concurred with the potential negative impact a permitted BP use could
9enerate in comparison with the impact this particular project proposes.
Commissioner Naggar relayed that any future development on this particular parcel would come
before the Planning Commission for approval and would be approved or denied on the medt of
that particular project and its particular impact.
Commissioner Webster relayed that this particular project would not have a negative impact
with respect to the issues of concern voiced by the adjacent property owners; regarding the
Development Plan, recommended that there be minor modifications with respect to the
architectural and site design; and with respect to the General Plan Amendment expressed
concurrence with the aforementioned Commission comments, specifically, as follows: a)
incompatibility with the existing land uses, and b) the impact the Zone Redesignatjon would
generate under PO Zoning with respect to increase in traffic counts, Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
increase, and building height.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to deny approval of the change in the General Plan;
and deny the change in the Zoning designation for the proposed development. (This motion
ultimately died due to lack of a second.)
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that due to the difficulties associated with the particular site
and the General Plan Amendment recommended that the General Plan not be amended;
recommended that the Commission reconsider the project subject to adoption of a Plan
Development Overlay (PDO) Zone, which would enable the applicant to address the issues of
concern (i.e., height, compatibility); relayed that the PDO Zone would provide flexibility for
provision of necessary standards for this particular project (i.e., height, buffering, access); and
clarified that the recommendation would be to continue the matter, allowing the applicant to
withdraw the General Plan Amendment, submit a Zone Change to PDO and bring the matter
back to the Planning Commission at a future point in time.
For Commissioner Webster, with regard impacts the PDO Zone Change would generate,
Planning Manager Ubnoske provided clarification.
Commissioners Guerriero and Soltysiak expressed concurrence with Planning Manager
Ubnoske's recommendation to continue the matter.
Commissioner Fahey relayed that if the PDO Zone change would provide for provision of
ingress and egress of the development in alternate locations, rather than at the high school,
utilizing both parcels to provide adequate access she could support the recommendation to
continue the matter.
Chairman Guerriero relayed his comments, as follows: with regard to land use issues, noted
that this particular project would create a less negative impact than other permitted uses, with
regard to property values, relayed that property values in Temecula were rising; noted that while
the adjacent property owners have a desire to leave this particular parcel vacant, growth and
development are inevitable; advised that additional traffic control be added between this parcel
and the high school; recommended that access to the private roads should be granted to the
Police Department; advised that with regard to noise, this particular project would provide
provision of a noise barrier;, with regard to the air conditioning units, relayed that the applicant
has adequately addressed the issue in the building design and the distance barrier; noted that
the City of Temecula has a need for this type of facility, enriching the quality of life in Temecula,
providing provision for seniors in the community, and family members of community residents;
and relayed that he could support the recommendation to continue the matter for consideration
of a PDO Zone change.
In response to Commissioner Naggar's comments, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the
expressed concerns of the Commission would be addressed when the matter was brought back
before the Commission.
Commissioner Naggar relayed his support of the recommendation to continue the matter.
The applicant relayed that a continuance to the Apdl 21, 1999 Planning Commission meeting
would be agreeable.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public headng; and continue the matter
to the Apdl 21, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Planning Manager Ubnoske introduced the new Project Planner, Mr. Steve Gdffin.
Chairman Guerdero welcomed him aboard.
Bo
Ms. Ubnoske presented the specific uses proposed on the outlots; relayed that she will
continue to update the Commission regarding these uses since they will not come before
the Commission. Chairman Guerdero expressed a desire to ensure that the design of
the uses was consistent with the City's Standards, and not to adopt the particular uses
prototyped designs if there is a negative visual effect. Attorney Cudey relayed the legal
constraints with regard to corporate signage.
Regarding the issue of illegal parking of vehicles in the City for the provision of selling
the vehicles, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that there is an Ordinance prohibiting this display of
such vehicles, noting that it is a Police Department issue; and advised the Commission
to specifically relay problem areas for further addressing. Chairman Guerdero relayed
that the problem is profuse in the City of Temecula, advising that the issue be addressed
on a regular basis.
Do
Senior Planner Fagan presented the comer monument design for the Power Center, at
Margarita and Winchester Roads; relayed that the name for the Development has been
designated The Commons at Temecula; and noted the specification of the design,
clarifying the representation of the design. !t was the consensus of the Commission that
the design of the monument would provide a negative visual effect Mr. Fagan advised
that he would forward the Commissioners comments.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Commissioner Webster relayed that numerous Diesel trucks are being parked on Diaz
Road. Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the issue will be addressed.
Commissioner Naggar relayed that he will be absent from the Apdl 7, 1999 Planning
Commission due to family vacation plans, noting a desire for provision of the agenda
packet for the particular meeting.
With regard to CEQA modifications, Commissioner Naggar relayed a desire for provision
of informational data regarding the changes.
10
Mr. Naggar relayed for informational purposes that the City of Temecula is currently
hosting 30 Japanese foreign exchange students.
Chairman Guerriem expressed concem with the apartment complex on Rancho
California Road (east of Momga Road) with regard to the pad location, with respect to
the proximity of the sidewalk.
11
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:23 P.M. Chairman .(~uerriero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday, April 7, 1999
at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
12
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
DRAFT MINUTES OF JUNE 2, 1999, PLANNING COMMISSION
\',TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R511-512pa98 CC Appl 7-13-99.doc
38
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 2, 1999
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00
P.M., on Wednesday June 2, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, Califomia.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Webster.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Fahey, Naggar, Webster, and Chairman
Guerdero.
Absent:
Commissioner Soltysiak.
Also Present:
Planning Manager- Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Attorney Cudey,
Senior Planner Fagan,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Associate Planner Donahoe,
Project Planner Thomsley, and
Minute Clerk Hartsen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Al~proval of A.Qenda
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected approval with the exception
of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
2. Apl~roval of Minutes-April 21, 1999
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the minutes, as wdtten. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent and Commissioner Fahey
who abstained.
3. Commissioner Attendance ~. Council Meetinas
Planning Manager Ubnoske queded the Commission for their input regarding
establishment of a policy regarding designation of one member of the Planning
Commission to attend the City Council Meetings and an alternate member to serve in
their stead should the initial member not be able to attend.
It was the consensus of the Commission to establish a policy designating the
Chairperson of the Planning Commission tO attend City Council Meetings; and
recommended that in his or her inability to attend that the Vice-Chairperson would
attend.
4. Public Convenience or Necessity for Trader Joe's
Senior Planner Fagan presented the staff report (of record); specified the proposed
location of this particular use; relayed that the use proposes to sell beer, wine, and
liquor, noted that State Law requires a local finding of public convenience or necessity
pdor to the issuance of an alcoholic beverage sales license; indicated that the third
response on the questionnaire (denoted on page 1 of the agenda material) should be
corrected to indicate within proximity to the Winchester MarketPlace in lieu of within the
Winchester MarketPlace; for Commissioner Webster, provided additional clarification
regarding vadance in licensed establishments, relaying the difference between ddnking
establishments (i.e., bars) and markets and restaurants; and for Chairman Guerdero,
relayed that there will be no consumption of alcoholic beverages on site at this
particular use.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the finding, based upon the
analysis provided. Commissioner Fahey seconded the motion. (This motion was
ultimately amended.)
For Commissioner Webster, Attomey Cudey provided clarification as to the
Commission's charge with regard to the specifidty of the finding, relaying that although
it was not necessary, if it was the desire of the Commission the motion could include
the specific cdteda that the finding was based on.
Chairman Guerriero recommended that the motion encompass the Commission's
rationale as to the cdteda for determination of the finding for this particular use, relaying
that he could support the finding due to the use being a specialty store.
MOTION: (Amending his odginal motion) Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the
finding of convenience and necessity based on the following: the use being a specialty
store, on the responses to the questionnaire, and upon the analysis provided. (This
motion ultimately died for lack of a second.)
Commissioner Fahey relayed that she could not support a finding of necessity.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the finding of convenience based
on the following: the use being a specialty store, on the responses to the questionnaire,
and upon the analysis provided. Commissioner Fahey seconded the motion and voice
vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
5. Power Center Comer Monument ~ SWC Mar.Qadta Winchester Roads
Associate Planner Donahoe presented the preliminary re-design plan for the Power
Center Comer Monument; relayed that the materials for this particular project would be
similar to the approved freestanding multi-tenant sign; specified that the balloon and
backdrop portion of the monument would be constructed of mosaic tile; and highlighted
the landscape design.
Mr. Cyril Cook, architect representing the applicant, provided additional clarification
regarding the design of the project; specified the lighting of the monument, providing a
dramatic effect; for Commissioner Webster, relayed the rationale for the placement of
the logo and the address entities, noting that the address portion of the monument
would not be lighted; for Chairman Guerdero, provided clarification as to the size of the
monument in proportion to the building size; and relayed the general landscape plan,
inclusive of berming, shrubbery, and the dense installation of trees.
Commissioner Webster recommended removal of one of the listed entities, specifically
the logo or the address portion of the lettering on the monument design.
In concurrence, Commissioner Fahey, echoed by Commissioners Naggar and
Guen'iero, recommended specifically, removal of the stone brown lettering, indicating
the address.
Chairman Guerdero expressed a desire to have provision of a line-of-sight diagram at
the time the project is brought back to the Commission, relaying concern with respect to
the view of the loading docks from Margarita Road.
Senior Planner Fagan relayed the rationale of bringing this particular design forward to
the Commission, solely in order to receive input, affirming Commissioner Fahey's
comments that the project has 'already been approved.
6. Capital Improvement Pro~3ram-Project Descriptions and Maps
Senior Planner Hogan presented the staff report (per agenda material); relayed that the
City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year plan, regarding infrastructure,
park issues, housing issues, and issues related to the continued development of Old
Town; specified that the projects have been designated in terms of pdodty levels; noted
that it was the Commission's charge to review the CIP for consistency with the City of
Temecula's General Plan; and for Commissioner Webster, clarified the rationale of
listing projects that are currently under construction.
Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified the Planning Commission's purview with regard to
review of the CIP; and confirmed, for Commissioner Webster, that as a community
member he could present his pdodty concerns to the City Council at the June 10, 1999
CIP Workshop.
With regard to Commissioner Webster's comments querying the CIP's lack of inclusion
of various projects that have been recommended by the Publicrrraffic Safety
Commission, Deputy Director of Public Works specified that the Rancho California
Road Widening Project between Ynez and Moraga Roads would be addressed by the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission in approximately two months; and relayed that
although numerous circulation projects have not been listed in the CIP, that the projects
have been approved by the City Council and will be initiated after completion of review.
In response to Commissioner Fahey's querying as to the timing of the projects,
Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the City Council would be reviewing and re-
pdodtizing the projects, which would culminate into the final determination of timing and
pdodty schedules for the listed entities.
Providing additional clarification as to the timing of the projects, Deputy Director of
Public Works Parks relayed that for the projects that encompass the first two years of
the five-year CIP, funding has been established.
In response to Chairman Guerdero's comments, regarding the Bddge Crossing Project
from Diaz Road to Jefferson Avenue, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed
that a bddge between Rancho Califomia Road and Winchester Road has been
identified, relaying that this particular project will be designed next year; and noted that
the second bddge crossing that would be funded for design would be located north of
Winchester Road, extending from Diaz Road to either Date Street or Cherry Street.
Having reviewed the CIP for consistency with the General Plan, Chairman Guerriero
relayed that no formal action was necessary with regard to this agenda item.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
' Planninf3 Application No. PA98-0511 (Zone Chan.~e) and Plannine
Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan)
PA98-0511: Request to change the Zoning designation at this location
from Business Park (BP) to Planned development Overlay (PDO); and,
PA98-0512: Request to develop a 244 unit senior's only apartment
complex with a two and three story buildings on 8.3 of the 12.3 acre site.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
By way of overheads and color renderings, Project Planner Thomsley presented the
staff report (of record); provided the rationale for bdnging this particular project back
before the Commission after reevaluation, relaying that staff has determined that this
application should be modified to include a Planned Development Oveday (PDO) which
would permit less intensive uses; noted that the PDO is proposed to be adopted
through a Zoning Amendment; highlighted the location, the site design, the landscape
plan, amenities, architecture, and parking; relayed that additional access points have
been added for the purpose of improved circulation, specifically, the addition of a
second driveway on Nicolas Road, and an alternate key gate access; and noted that
the traffic studies for this particular project revealed that at AM peak traffic hours
(between 7:00 and 7:15 A.M.) the Senior Housing Project would generate an additional
11 tdps per hour.
Project Planner Thomsley addressed the Commissioners comments, as follows:
For Commissioner Naggar, clarified that the daily overall trip generation for
this particular project would be between 800 and 900 trips per day; and
provided additional clarification with regard to the conditional permitting of a
Religious Institution use (denoted on page 26 of the staff report, Section:
Schedule of Permitted Uses).
For Commissioner Webster, provided additional information regarding the
carports on the site design; relayed that this project would be classified as
high density (30 units per acre); noted that the applicant has provided a
noise study which has been ceded to the Building Department for their
review; and clarified that the Development Standards would remain
consistent with the standards that are currently in effect under the Business
Park zoning designation, referencing page 20, Section B1, of the staff report;
and indicated that the footnotes denoted on pages 25 and 27 (per agenda
material) should be corrected to indicate "1 ."
For Chairman Guerdero, with regard to the recommendation to install a
median in the entranceway of the project, provided additional information
regarding the restrictions imposed by emergency access requirements.
For Commissioner Naggar, Attomey Curley further clarified the proposed zoning
permitted uses with respect to the PDO, relaying that the proposed zoning amendment
would not permit conversion of this project to Multiple Family Housing units.
For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that any future
development at the high school would not require City approval, relaying that a potential
project would be permitted by the State; and' advised that a Condition of Approval
(COA) could be added to require that the tenants of this particular senior housing
project be notified of the potential projects at the adjacent high school (i.e., stadium).
VVith regard to the State approval of future projects at the high school site, Attorney
Cudey advised that the process would subject the project to adherence to CEQA
requirements, relaying that there would be noticing of any future proposed projects.
For Commissioner Webster, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided additional
information with respect to the closed dght-in and right-out access located at the high
school site on Winchester Road, relaying that this closure is associated with the School
District, and not the City of Temecula.
For Commissioner Naggar, with regard to permitted uses in the PDO, specifically as it
relates to Religious Institutions, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided additional
clarification with respect to that particular use being conditionally permitted in every
distdct of the City of Temecula.
Mr. Curtis Miller, representing the applicant, addressed the concems and comments of
the Commission, as follows: for Commissioner Webster, relayed that while this project
does not have particular designated affordable housing units at this time, the project
could potentially accommodate such housing; with respect to the noise impact
generated from the study, relayed general mitigating measures that may be required for
this particular project; for Commissioner Fahey, addressed the noise impact from the
high school; and for Chairman Guerdero, specified the location of the air conditioning
units.
Mr. James Mickhartz, architect representing the applicant, addressed the concems and
comments of the Commission, as follows: for Commissioner Webster, provided
additional clarification regarding the carports, relaying that the intent of the design was
to detract attention from the carports, directing visual focus to the building design due to
the enhanced articulation (i.e., balconies, recessed windows); confirmed that the
photograph representation presented by Project Planner Thomsley is consistent with
the carport design for this particular project; in response to Chairman Guerriero's
comments with regard to further articulation on the end walls, advised that the design
intent was to implement enhancements that would affect the quality of life for the
residents (i.e., landscaping, pool and recreational areas); relayed the specifications of
the stone application at the entdes; for Commissioner Fahey, noted that due to the
small size of the units, the addition of windows on the end walls would restdct needed
wall space for the tenants; advised that from an architectural standpoint the suggestion
to add pop-outs for additional articulation would not be desirable due to the intent to
provide a visual appearance reflecting solidity; relayed that the landscaping would
ultimately provide some screening of the end walls; further specified the enhanced
articulation on alternate building elevations; for Commissioner Webster, specified the
paint application (via the color board); provided the approximate location of the transit
stop; specified the location of the easement, relaying that if at a future point in time the
entire transportation corridor was utilized, the remaining landscape easement would be
approximately five (5) to six (6) feet; and provided additional clarification with respect to
the roof-mounted air conditioning units.
For Commissioner Webster, regarding the open space requirement associated with
Multiple Family Housing, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that this project would not
need to adhere to that requirement due to the following: the applicable PDO standards,
the extensive landscaping, and the fact that this project is categodzed as Senior
Housing, and not Multiple Family Housing.
Attomey Cudey provided additional information with respect to the standards and
requirements associated with the PDO for this proposed project, reiterating that this
particular project would not be categodzed as Multiple Family Housing.
Mr. John Boarman, transportation engineer representing the applicant, addressed the
concerns and comments of the Commission, as follows: for Commissioner Webster,
relayed that the Level of Service (LOS) at Nicolas and Winchester Roads is currently at
Level C dudng peak pedods, noting that this LOS would not be modified by this
particular project; advised that at build-out the LOS would be at Level D dudng peak
pedods; in response to Commissioner Naggar's comments with respect to the traffic
impact due to weekend and evening school activities, relayed that the Traffic Study did
not address weekend and night impact due to the insignificance of the impact, noting
that Roripaugh Road would be accessible to accommodate the traffic associated with
weekend and evening activities; in response to Chairman Guerdero's and
Commissioner Fahey's expressed concem with respect to the open entranceway
accessed on Nicolas Road potentially being utilized by high school traffic, advised that
the residents could utilize alternate exits dudng peak traffic hours; and relayed that the
entranceway would prohibit left-tums out of the project onto Nicolas Road during peak
hours.
For Chairman Guerdero, Project Planner Thornsley spedfled the location of the gates
on the site plan.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project:
Ms. Shad Crall
Ms. Debby Fischer
Mr. Glen Zdanowski
31524 Bdtton Circle
31251 Felicita Road
39614 Knollridge Ddve
The aforementioned individuals voiced their concems, as follows:
· ,' The potential for this project to impede the proposed high school's stadium
· ,' The traffic impact associated with the project
-,' Mixing of teenage ddvers with senior ddvers
· / Incompatible with the adjacent use, specifically the high school
· ,' The height of the building
· -' Recommended installation of a stop sign on Rustic Glen Ddve
Ms. Crall relayed that the previously discussed dosed ddveway at the high school site
was due to a Caltrans determination.
For Ms. Crall, Commissioner Webster queded whether notification to the Senior
Housing tenants regarding the school's proposed stadium project would allay her
conceITIS.
With respect to Ms. Crall's comments, Attorney Cudey provided clarification as to the
effect of providing disclosure of the proposed stadium project on the rental agreements
for the Senior Housing tenants, which would limit the recourse the tenants would have
to impede the proposed high school projects.
For Mr. Zdanowski, Project Planner Thomsley clarified that the additional ddveway
would allow only dght-in and right-outs, per Caltrans' and the City's recommendation.
The following individuals spoke in favor of the project:
z~ Mr. Peter Steding landowner of the property in discussion
'z:7 Mr. Wayne Hall 42131 Agena Street
z~ Mr. Wayne Bershaw 30149 Corte Cantera
The aforementioned individuals expressed their comments, as follows:
· ,' The proposed project is a more compatible use with the adjacent uses than other
current permitted uses (i.e., business park)
,,,' The shopping centers proximate location to the Senior Center previding
easy access for the Seniors
,,' Commended the design of the project
Recommended that the project be conditioned to participate in the
Affordable Senior Housing Program
The need for this type of facility in the City of Temecula
With respect to Commissioner Webster's querying whether the applicant would be
agreeable to participate in the construction of a pedestrian overpass at Winchester
Road, Mr. Miller advised that further analysis would be required before the applicant
could relay agreement to participate in the proposal,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that there is a Capital Improvement
Project that will be initiated next fiscal year that would extend the Santa Gertrudis
trevelway underneath the bddge at Winchester Road; and relayed that there will be
prevision of crossing Winchester Road without accessing the street.
With respect to conditioning the project to participate in the Affordable Senior Housing
Project, Attomey Cudey relayed additional clarification as to placing this particular
requirement on the project without provision of further analysis.
Project Planner Thomsley relayed that staff had received numereus calls from the
public, expressing comments in favor of the project, noting that one phone call relaying
opposition to the project was received.
Mr. Curtis Miller noted that the applicant has worked diligently to address the
Commission's concerns which were relayed at the Maroh 17, 1999 Planning
Commission meeting; and thanked the Commission for their consideration.
Commissioner Fahey relayed that the additional altemate exit onto Winchester Road
adequately addressed her concern with regard to access; recommended that the
project be conditioned to appropriately notify the tenants of the preposed high school
projects; and advised that she could support the project.
After thorough review of the project, Commissioner Webster noted that this particular
use was compatible with the adjacent land uses; in order to obtain Commission input,
relayed concern with respect to the width of the landscape easement if the
transportation corridor was utilized at a future point in time; concurred with
Commissioner Fahey's recommendation to condition the project to provide tenant
disclosure with regard to the existing uses and future uses at the high school site; with
respect to the mitigating CEQA requirements, recommended an additional mitigation
measure, regarding the noise study; with respect to the high school parking lot,
suggested that the City initiate discussion with Caltrans regarding consideration to open
the closed ddveway on Winchester Road at the high school which would alleviate traffic
concerns; and relayed that the additional landscaping, and the two-color paint
application will adequately buffer the previously discussed end walls.
While acknowledging the diligent efforts of the applicant in attempting to address the
concerns of the Commission, Commissioner Naggar relayed that due to the concern
with regard to this use being incompatible with the adjacent use, specifically the high
school (i.e., proposed lighted stadium, noise impact, numerous school activities), with
great reluctance relayed that he could not support this project at this particular location.
Chairman Guerdero recommended that at the main entranceway off Nicolas Road, the
applicant work with staff to investigate design of a median with additional stop signs
controlling outbound traffic.
Project Planner Thomsley specified that the ddveway is currently 30 feet wide, that due
to required provision for emergency access the recommended project would need to
encompass two 20-foot driveways, and then additional width for provision of a median.
Chairman Guerdero recommended that staff investigate mitigating measures to slow
down the in-and-out traffic at the aforementioned entranceway.
Per Commissioner Webster's suggestion, Project Planner Thomsley advised that the
radius of the curvature in the area of discussion is required to provide provision for the
turning radius of the Fire Department trucks, relaying that this turning radius could not
be lessened.
The applicant relayed that he would be agreeable to work with staff to investigate
measures to address Chairman Guen'iero's concern with regard to the entranceway.
With respect to Chairman Guerdero's comment regarding the landscaping issue along
Winchester Road, Project Planner Thornsley provided additional clarification with
respect to the long-range ineffectiveness of increasing the tree size.
Commissioner Fahey expressed reluctance to require additional landscaping along the
Winchester corridor due to the requirement not being placed on other projects; and
suggested that a specific width landscape easement be maintained, ensuring an
adequate buffer if the transportation corridor was utilized.
In concurrence with Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed a
reluctance to require provisions for this particular project in light of other uses not being
conditioned for those requirements.
For Chairman Guerdero, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that there
would be adequate provision for acceleration with respect to exiting the driveway onto
Winchester Road, relaying that due to the approaching signal at Nicolas Road the traffic
would be slowing down; and with respect to the transportation corridor, relayed that the
potential transportation system in the corddor may not utilize the complete corddor (i.e.,
a monorail system).
While concurring with Commissioner Webster's recommendation to construct a
pedestrian overpass, Commissioner Fahey advised that she would not recommend
placing a nexus on this particular project.
Commissioner Webster clarified that it was his desire that the City initiate the process of
designating the specific location for the overpass project, and to then initiate the design
portion of the project; and recommended adding the project to the CIP.
Mr. Miller suggested that the landscape easement be modified to incorporate a denser
landscape buffer, in lieu of a wider one.
Commissioner Webster relayed that it was his recommendation that the applicant work
with staff to create a landscape easement that would be consistent with the General
Plan, providing adequate width if the transportation corddor was developed.
For Commissioner Webster, Attomey Cudey advised that if it was the desire of the
Commission to address the aforementioned landscape easement in the COA's that on
page 35, Condition No., additional language could be added to reflect "Landscaping
shall conform substantially with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit F,
and with the General Plan..."
Planning Manager Ubnoske recommended that an additional COA be added to state
that the project shall comply with the mitigation measures contained in the noise study
prior to the issuance of building permits.
With regard to the Commission's desire to condition the project with respect to
disclosure, Attorney Cudey read into the record an additional Condition, as follows:
Condition No. 106: The applicant shall prrepare and submit for the approval of the
Planning Manager a disclosure statement identifying the adjacent high school use, and
those uses and activities thereon reasonably anticipated to occur. The applicant shall
provide a copy of the approved disclosure statement to each person occupying a unit in
the project;, and clarified the rationale for the use of broad language.
The applicant expressed agreement to the aforementioned Condition No. 106.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; adopt Resolution
No. 99-015 recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0511 (Zoning
Amendment, Planned Development Overlay) based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report; adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning
Application Nos. PA98-0511 (Zoning Amendment, Planned Development Overlay) and
PA98-0512 (Development), including mitigation measures for the noise study; adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0512 (Development
Plan), addressing the new study as well; and adopt Resolution No. 99-016 approving
Planning Application No. PA98-0512 (Development Plan) based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
10
RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY. COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND DEVELOPMENT
· CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS
166 AND 181 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO
KNOWN AS PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0477,
PREVIOUSLY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085.
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 )
RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0512
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) A PROPOSAL TO BUILD A 244 UNIT SENIOR
HOUSING COMPLEX WITH TWO AND THREE STORY APARTMENT
BUILDINGS ON 8.3 ACRES; LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND
181 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY; ALSO KNOWN AS
PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0477, PREVIOUSLY
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085
Add
That the applicant work with staff to design an appropriate landscape
easement consistent with the General Plan (adding additional language
to Condition No. 8, as worded on page 10 of the minutes.)
That the applicant provide a disclosure statement to the tenants of the
Senior Housing complex (with the addition of Condition No. 106, as
worded on page 10 of the minutes.)
· That the applicant work with staff to design a median or other mitigating
measure to control in-and-out traffic at the main entranceway.
The addition of a Condition with language stating that prior to issuance of
building permits, the project shall comply with the mitigation measures
contained in the noise study.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Commissioner Naggar who voted n_go and Commissioner Soltysiak who was
absent.
At 8:42 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 8:56 P.M.
11
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Planning Manager Ubnoske informed the Commission that staff will be distributing a
Planning Guide to the Commission on a monthly basis to provide an overview of
upcoming projects and workshops.
B=
Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the City Council/Commission Workshop regarding: Brown
Act/Conflict of Interest will be held on Tuesday, June 15, 1999.
C=
For informational purposes, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the City Council will consider the
matter of hidng a recommended consultant for the purpose of updating the City's
Housing Element at the next City Council meeting.
Ms. Ubnoske relayed that staff will be bdnging to the Commission a conceptual site
'plan of the Home Depot proposed to be located at Highway 79 South in the Village
Center, for the purpose of obtaining preliminary Commission input.
COM MISSlONER REPORTS
In response to Commissioner Naggar's comments, Senior Planner Hogan advised that
it is the goal of staff to provide an end-of-year summary at the end of this calendar year.
With respect to the Rodpaugh Ranch Workshop, Commissioner Webster recommended
providing the matedal to the Commissioners as soon as possible.
In response to Commissioner Webster's comments regarding the Southem Califomia
Moving and Storage Project's deviation from the grading plan that was approved by the
Planning Commission, and with respect to the applicant filling in the area adjacent to
the retaining wall located on the adjacent property without permission from the property
owner, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that he would further investigate
the matters.
For informational purposes, Chairman Guerriero relayed that per phone
correspondence with the Alcohol Beverage and Control Agency in Riverside the
following facts were obtained regarding alcoholic establishments in the Census Tract
'that primarily encompasses Temecula:
The alcoholic establishments are divided into two categories.
On-Sale Establishments (where the alcohol is consumed on site)
a. The State allows 28 of these particular uses.
b. The Census Tract (which encompasses primarily the City of Temecula)
currently has 82 of these particular uses, with three pending.
Off-Sale Establishments (where there is no alcoholic consumption on site)
a. The State allows 21 of these particular uses.
b. The Census Tract currently has 34 of these particular uses, with no
pending uses due to the fact that the State will not approve additional
sites.
12
Planning Manager Ubnoske provided additional clarification regarding allowable
alcoholic establishments; and relayed the City's efforts to maintain a cdteda for
allowance that is legally defensible.
Attorney Cudey advised that the alcoholic establishments be evaluated as individual
uses based on the analysis provided for each particular project, rather than basing the
approval solely on numbers; and provided additional cladficetion with regard to the
development of a more specific criteda for making a finding of convenience of
necessity.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:17 P.M. Chairman Guerdero formally adjoumed this meeting to a City Council/Commission
Workshop regarding: Brown Act/Conflict of Interest on Tuesday, June 15, 1999 at 6:00 P.M.,
and the next regular meeting Wednesday, June 16, 1999 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula.
Ron Guerdero, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
13
ITEM 27
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CiTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager'
July 27, 1999
Ordinance Regulating Massage Establishments and Massage
Practitioners (Planning Application PA97o0201 )
RECOMMENDATION:
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5.22, TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
REGULATIONS FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND CHAPTER 5.23 TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
REGULATIONS FOR MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS WITHIN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, REPEALING RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 596 AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY, AND
AMENDING SECTION 1.08.010 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ADOPTION BY REFERENCE
OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCES.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has been working with a subcommittee composed of local massage practitioners for the
past year to try to develop an ordinance that provides a basic regulatory framework to permit the
practice of legitimate massage and make it more difficult to use the massage profession as a
cover for other illegal activities. The draft ordinance has been developed to ensure that
massage businesses and practitioners meet certain standards. An essential component of the
ordinance is the requirement for background checks of all massage business operators and
massage practitioners. Persons who have cdminal records could be prohibited from either
operating or working in a massage establishment.
\\TEMEC_FS201 ~DATA~DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~201 PA97 CC2.doc
1
The Ordinance would create Chapter 5.22 of the Temecula Municipal Code to regulate the
ownership and operation of massage establishments. This Chapter would also set performance
standards for how massage establishments can operate. The proposed Ordinance would also
create Chapter 5.23 of the Temecula Municipal Code to regulate the certification and approval
of massage practitioners. A copy of the proposed Ordinance is included as Attachment No. 1.
The latest revised draft ordinance was last presented to this subcommittee on May 4, 1999.
The pdmary concerns of the massage professionals who attended this meeting was the
requirement that beginning massage practitioners (who have graduated from an approved
school) can only do massage by working for someone else. In addition, staff already identified a
potential redundancy within the proposed ordinance for independent massage practitioners.
The proposed ordinance has been amended to address both of these issues.
Supervision Requirement
The initial draft of the Ordinance required that only massage practitioners who have completed
at least 500 hours of education could provide massage services independently of another
person. To obtain more information about this, staff contacted the American Massage Therapy
Association (AMTA). The representative of AMTA stated they have two membership levels, one
for students and first-time practitioners and another level of membership for practitioners who
have at least three years of professional experience. The AMTA does not require that
beginning massage professionals practice under a more experienced person. As a result, staff
has removed the requirement that massage professionals with less than 500 hours of education
be required to work for massage therapist with 500 or more hours of education.
Independent Massage Practitioners
One issue that was brought up to staff by the massage professionals is the plight of the
independent massage practitioner. An independent practitioner is a massage professional who
operates their own business where only they provide massage services. Under earlier versions
of the ordinance, this person would have had to apply for both a massage establishment permit
and a massage practitioner license. Since both processes are similar, it seemed unreasonable
to require a person to receive two identical approvals for the same business. As a result, a
definition for independent practitioner and Section 5.23.080 were added to the draft ordinance to
address this situation. To prevent this provision from being used as a loophole for non-
legitimate massage, these businesses are prohibited from sharing space and/or support staff
with other massage practitioners or establishments.
Environmental Review
The adoption of this ordinance consists of regulations to oversee a medical/business practice
that utilizes existing business space. Because these activities will take place at previously
developed facilities and do not generate any hazardous or toxic materials, the regulation of
massage businesses and professionals could not have an impact on the physical environment.
Therefore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to
Subsections 15061 (b)( 1 ) and (3) of the C EQA Guidelines.
\\TEMEC_FS201~)ATA~)EPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~201 PA97 CC2.doc
2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Permit application fees will be determined through the user fee study currently being prepared
by DMG, Some additional staff time will be required to monitor and enforce the ordinance. This
additional staff time will occur pdmadly in the Community Development and Police Departments.
The costs associated with adopting and implementing this ordinance are not expected to be
significant.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Draft Ordinance - Page 4
\\TEMEC_FS2OI~)ATA~)EPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~.01 PA97 CC2.doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
DRAFT ORDINANCE
\\TEMEC_FS201 ~DATA~DEPTS~DLANNING\STAFFRPT~201 PA97 CC2.doc
4
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5.22, TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS
FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AND CHAPTER 5.23 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR MASSAGE
PRACTITIONERS WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, REPEALING
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 596 AS ADOPTED BY THE
CITY AND AMENDING SECTION 1.08.010 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin.qs. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Coundl of the City of Temecula makes
the following findings:
A. The use of therapeutic massage by members of the community has increased
substantially in recent years. The type of massage services and the manner in which such services are
provided to members of the community has also changed to meet the new demands of the community.
Accordingly, it is necessary for the City to revise its massage regulations to reflect the changes in the
manner in which massage services are provided to members of the public by massage professionals.
B. State law allows cities to license massage establishments and those persons who
provide massage services.
C. Given the absence of comprehensive state regulations, local regulation of massage
establishments and those who provide massage services is necessary to protect the public health,
safety, and welfare by:
1. Establishing and requiring a dean and safe environment for massage
services be maintained;
2. Requiring minimum standards for the education, training, and conduct of
massage practitioners; and,
3. Enhancing public confidence in those who provide massage services within
the City of Temecula.
Section 2. Title 5, "Business Licenses and Regulations," of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended by adding Chapter 5.22, "Massage Establishments," to the Temecula Municipal
Code to read as follows:
"CHAPTER 5.22
MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
5.22.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this Chapter, only the words, terms, and phrases set forth in this Section
\XTEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Dral~ Massage Ordinance.doc
1
shall have the meanings herein set forth unless the context cleady requires a different meaning.
A. 'Accredited School of Massage' means a licensed educational enterprise accredited to
provide bona fide education in the field of massage. Such accreditation must be awarded by the
governmental agency having jurisdiction upon these schools.
B. 'Director' means the Director of Community Development or his or her designee.
C. 'Employee' means and includes every owner, partner, manager, supervisor, and worker,
whether paid or not, who renders massage services, or activities that further massage services, of any
nature in the operation of a Massage Establishment;
D. 'Independent Practitioner' means a massage practitioner, licensed subject to the applicable
regulations, who is the sole operator and massage practitioner at a small scale massage establishment
that meets all the following requirements:
1. All massage services are provided only by the licensed massage practitioner who
owns or leases the facility; and,
2. The massage services are not provide in conjunction with, or share any space or
support staff, with any other independent massage practitioner or massage establishment; and,
3. The business space owned or leased by the independent practitioner may not be
shared or jointly utilized by any other massage practitioner; and,
4. The total floor space for the independent practitioner will generally be less than one
thousand (1000) square feet.
E. 'Permit' means the Permit to operate a Massage Establishment as required by this Chapter.
F. 'Massa.ae' means any method of pressure on, or friction against, or stroking, kneading,
rubbing, tapping, pounding, vibrating, or stimulating the internal or external parts of the human body with
the hands or with the aid of any mechanical or electrical apparatus, or other appliances or devices, with
or without such supplementary aids as rubbing alcohol, liniment, antiseptic, oil, powder, cream, lotion,
ointment or other similar preparations, including, without limitation, shiatsu, acupressure, or similar
activities.
G. 'Massa.cle Establishment' means any business organization having a fbxed place of business
where any individuals, either as employees or as participants in a business organization, including but
not limited to a firm, assodation, partnership, corporation, joint venture, limited liability company, or other
combination of individuals, engages in, conducts, carries on, permits or suffers to be engaged in,
conducted, or carded on for consideration, massages or health treatments involving massage. Massage
Establishments may be in located in (i) space entirely devoted to a Massage Establishment, (ii) within
other types of businesses subject to the provisions of this Chapter, or (iii) conducted upon the premises
of a client.
H. 'Massa.ae Practitioner' means any person who administers massages to another person for
any consideration whatsoever, has completed at least 100 hours of education through an accredited
school of massage.
I. 'Person' means any individual, firm, association, partnership, corporation, joint venture,
limited liability company or partnership, or combination of individuals.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFrS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doc
2
.1. 'Person Who has En.cla.cled in Disclualifvin.cl Conduct' means a person who:
1. Within twenty (20) years immediately preceding the date of filing of the application
in question or, in the case of revocation or suspension proceedings, within twenty (20) years of the date
of notice of headng pursuant to Section 5.22.120, has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction
of:
a. Any misdemeanor or felony offense which relates directly to the operation
of a Massage Establishment, or effected public safety, whether as a Massage Establishment owner or
operator, or Massage Practitioner; or,
b. Any felony, the commission of which occurred on the premises of a
Massage Establishment; or,
2. Within twenty (20) years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the
application in question or, in the case of revocation or suspension proceedings, within twenty (20) years
of the date of notice of revocation or suspension headng, whichever is applicable, has had any Massage
Establishment, operator, Massage Practitioner, or other massage related Permit or permit issued by the
State of California, or any county or city revoked; or,
3. Within twenty (20) years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the
application, or in the case of revocation or suspension proceedings, within twenty (20) years of the date
of notice of revocation or suspension hearing, whichever is applicable, has been convicted in a court
of competent jurisdiction of:
a. Any violation of California Penal Code Sections 266(h), 266(I), 315, 316,
318, or Section 674(b), as amended, which are hereby incorporated by reference; or,
above; or,
b. Conspiracy or attempt to commit any such offense defined in subsection 3.a.
c. Any offense in a jurisdiction outside the State of California which is the
equivalent of any of the aforesaid offenses; or,
d. Any felony offense involving the sale of a controlled substance specified in
Califomia Health and Safety Code Sections 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 11058; as amended, which
are hereby incorporated by reference; or,
e. Has been found guilty of or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to any lesser-
included offense of the violations identified in Subsections 3.a. and/or 3.d. above; or,
4. Is required to register under the provisions of California Penal Code Section 290; or,
5. Has been subjected to a permanent injunction against the conducting or maintaining
of a nuisance pursuant to Califomia Penal Code Sections 11225 through 11235 or any similar provisions
of law in a jurisdiction outside the State of California.
K. 'Spedfled Anatomical Areas' shall .include the following human anatomical areas: genitals,
pubic regions, buttocks, anuses, or female breasts below a point immediately above the top or side of
the areola.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massagg Ordinance:.doc
3
5.22.020 Massage Establishment Permit Required.
It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor, subject to prosecution and punishment in accordance
with Section 1.20.010 et seq. of this Code, for any person as an owner or operator to engage in, conduct,
or carry on, in or upon any premises within the City the operation of a Massage Establishment without
a Permit obtained from the Director as required by this Chapter, unless such person, owner or operator
is exempted from the provisions of this Chapter by Section 5.22.025. A separate Permit shall be
obtained for each separate Massage Establishment operated by such person. Upon payment of the
appropriate application fee, a Massage Establishment Permit shall be issued to any person who has
complied with the requirements of this Chapter and all other applicable provisions of the Code, unless
grounds for denial of such Permit are found to exist. A Permit to operate a Massage Establishment shall
be valid for a pedod of one (1) year, commencing at the date of issuance.
5.22.025 Exemptions.
A. This Chapter shall not apply to the following classes of businesses:
1. Physidans, surgeons, chiropractors, or osteopaths who are duly licensed to practice
their respective professions in the State of California under the provisions of the Business and
Professions Code, while performing activities encompassed by such professional Permits; or,
2. Nurses or physical therapists who are duly licensed to practice their professions in
the State of California under the provisions of Business and Professions Code, while performing
activities encompassed by such professional Permits; or,
3. Other health care personnel engaged in the healing arts as regulated and licensed
by Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code; or
4, Athletic trainers certified by the State of California performing training services at
bona fide professional, amateur or school athletic events or practices.
5. A Massage Practitioner operating their own massage business under a valid
Independent Practitioner's Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.23.080 of the Temecula Municipal Cede.
5.22.030
Requirements for Massage Establishment Permit
Applications.
A. On the application the Applicant shall set forth, in reasonable detail, the exact nature of the
massage, bath, or health treatments to be administered, the proposed place of business and facilities
therefor in addition to the following information on forms approved by the Director:
1. The previous residence addresses of applicant, if any, for a peded of eight (8) years
immediately prior to the date of the application and the dates of residence at each;
2. Reasonable proof that the applicant is at least eighteen (18) years of age;
3. The history of the applicant as to the operation of any Massage Establishment or
similar business or occupation within eight (8) years immediately preceding the filing of the application.
Such information shall include, but shall not be limited to, a statement under penalty of perjury of the
laws of the State of California as to whether or not such person, in previously operating a Massage
Establishment within this State under a license or permit, has had such license or permit revoked or
suspended and the reasons thereto; and the business, activity, or occupation the permit applicant
engaged in subsequent to such action of revocation or suspension;
\\TEMEC_FS20I \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinanc¢.doc 4
4. Business, occupation, or employment history of the applicant for the five (5) years
immediately preceding the date of the application;
5. Applicant's height, weight, eye color, and hair color;
6. Fingerprints for purposes of establishing identification;
7. Two (2) prints of a recent passport-size and type color photograph of the applicant;
8. All criminal convictions or offenses described in Paragraph J of Section 5.22.010;
whether the applicant is required to register under the provisions of California Penal Code Section 290;
whether the applicant, including a corporation or partnership, or a former employer of the applicant while
so employed, or a building in which the applicant was so employed or a business conducted, was ever
subjected to an abatement proceeding under California Penal Cede Sections 11225 through 11235 or
any similar provisions of law in a jurisdiction outside the State of California;
9. If the applicant:
a. Is a corporation, then the application shall set forth the name of the
corporation shall be set forth exactly as shown in its articles of incorporation, together with the names
and residence addresses of each of its officers, directors, and each stockholder holding stock in the
corporation, along with the amount of stock held.
b. Is a partnership, then the application shall set forth the name and residence
addresses of each of the partners, including limited partners. If one or more of the partners is a
corporation, the provisions of this Section pertaining to a corporate applicant shall apply.
c. Is a limited liability company, then the name of the company shall be set
forth exactly as shown in its articles of organization or operating agreement, together with the names
and residence addresses of each of its officers, directors, and each member along with a description
of the relative business interests of the members.
d. Is any other form of business organization, the application shall set forth the
name and residence of each participant.
10. The names and residence addresses of all persons currently employed or intended
to be employed in the Massage Establishment, regardless of the nature of the employment, including
the names and addresses of any person permitted pursuant to Section 5.22.020 along with the proposed
or actual nature of the work performed or to be performed, and recent passport-sized color photographs,
suitable for the Director to process the application of each such employee. The Director shall require
such employees to furnish fingerprints for the purpose of establishing identification. Any applicant or
permittee shall notify the City in writing of the names, addresses, and nature of the work, or any new
employees, within five (5) days of such employment, and supply the photographs described in this
subsection. Such new employees shall allow fingerprints to be taken for the purpose of identification
upon request;
11. A statement in writing by the applicant that he or she certifies under penalty of
perjury of the laws of the State of Califomia that the information contained in the application is true and
correct, said statement being duly dated;
12. Authorization for the City, its employees and agents to seek information and conduct
an investigation, including, but not limited to, a records check of prior convictions, into the truth of the
statements set forth in the application and the qualifications of the applicant for the Permit; and,
\~TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doc
5
13. Such other information as may reasonably be deemed necessary by the Director.
B. Notwithstanding the fact that an application filed hereunder may be a 'public record' under
Government Code Section 6250 et seq., certain portions of such application contain information vital to
the effective administration and enforcement of the licensing and/or permit scheme established herein
which is personal, pdvate, confidential, or the disclosure of which could expose the applicant to a dsk
of harm. Those portions of the application which are not subject to disclosure are: the applicant's
residence address and telephone number, the applicanfs date of birth and/or age, the applicant's ddver's
Permit and/or Social Secudty Number, and/or personal financial data. The City Council in adopting the
application and licensing and/or permit system set forth herein has determined in accordance with
Government Code Section 6255 that the public interest in disclosure of the information set forth above
is outweighed by the public interest in achieving compliance with this Chapter by ensuring that the
applicant's privacy, confidentially, or security interests are protected. The City Clerk shall cause to be
redacted from any copy of a completed Permit application made available to any member of the public,
the information set forth above.
5.22.040 Massage Establishment Permit Application Fee.
Any application for a Permit to operate a Massage Establishment shall be accompanied by a
non-refundable fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council. The application fee shall
be used to pay the costs of the investigation, any reports, and related application processing issues.
5.22.050 Approval or Denial of a Massage Establishment Permit.
A. Within forty-five (45) calendar days following receipt of a completed application and
verification of the information contained in application, the Director shall either issue the Permit or mail
a written statement of the reasons for denial thereof. For the purposes of the timeline identified in this
section, the forty-five (45) calendar day period does not begin until the City has received the required
law enforcement reports
B. The Director shall deny a Permit to any applicant where any of the following conditions exist:
1. The applicant has made one (1) or more material misstatements in the application
for a Permit; or,
2. The applicant, or the partners, limited partners, shareholders, members, officers, or
the manager of the applicant, or any such individual, is a person who has engaged in disqualifying
conduct in the past twenty (20) years, as described in Paragraph I of Section 5.22.010; or,
3. The Massage Establishment, as proposed by the Permit applicant, if permitted,
would not comply with all the applicable laws, including, but not limited to, all the City's building, fire,
zoning, and health regulations; or,
4. The applicant is lacking in the backgreund and qualifications to conduct a bona fide
Massage Establishment; or,
5. Any persons to be employed by applicant are persons who have engaged in
disqualifying conduct as described in Paragraph J of Section 5.22.010; or,
6. The applicant has violated any provision of this Chapter, or any similar ordinance,
law, rule, or regulation of any other public agency which regulates the operation of Massage
Establishments; or,
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEFrS~PLANNING~Final Draft Massag~ Ordinance.doc
6
7. The applicant is less than eighteen (18) years of age.
C. Any appeal of the derision by the Director to deny a Massage Establishment Permit shall
be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.22.120 of this Code.
5.22.060 Applicability to Existing Massage Establishments.
Each owner or operator of a Massage Establishment legally doing business on the effective date
of this Chapter shall apply for a Permit not later than ninety (90) days therefrom, and shall comply with
all requirements which are prerequisites for issuance of a Permit before such a Permit may be issued.
If a Permit is denied for any such business, the business shall cease operation upon issuance of the
Director's decision. The Director may allow additional time for employees of an applicant to comply with
the educational requirements for the Massage Practitioners contained in Chapter 5.23 of the Temecula
Munidpal Code.
5.22.070
Massage Establishment Facility and Operational
Requirements.
All Massage Establishments shall comply with all applicable requirements of Federal, State, or
local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances including, but not limited to the following criteria:
A. Cabinets or other covered space shall be provided and used for the storage of dean linen.
Approved receptacles shall be provided for the storage of all soiled linen, paper towels, and other
discarded or disposed items.
B. Ventilation shall be provided in accordance with the applicable provisions of the construction
codes adopted by the City of Temecula as set forth in Title 15 of this Code. To allow for adequate
ventilation in cubicles, rooms, and areas provided for patrons' use, which are not serviced directly by
required windows or mechanical systems of ventilation, partitions shall be constructed so that the height
of partition does not exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of the floor-to-ceiling height of the area in which
they are located.
C. All Massage Establishments shall be provided with dean and sanitary towels, sheets, and
linens in suffident quantity to service the patrons of the fadlity. Towels, sheets, and linens shall not be
used by or for more than one person. Reuse of linen is prohibited unless the linen has first been
laundered. Heavy white paper may be substituted for sheets; provided that such paper is used once for
each person and then discarded into a sanitary receptacle.
D. All walls, ceilings, floors, pools, showers, bathtubs, steam rooms, and all other physical
radiities including appliances and apparatuses of the establishment must be in good repair and
maintained in a dean and sanitary condition. Wet and dry heat rooms, steam or vapor rooms, or steam
or vapor cabinets, shower compartments, and toilet rooms shall be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected
each day the business is in operation.
E. Disinfecting agents and sterilizing equipment shall be provided for any instruments used in
performing any massage and said instruments shall be disinfected and sterilized after each use.
F. To assure patrons' health, safety, sanitation, and comfort, all employees and massage
practitioners shall be both physically dean and dressed in such a manner which does not expose any
Spedfled Anatomical Areas when performing services on patrons. There shall be no nudity by
employees of the Massage Establishment and employees shall not reveal Spedfled Anatomical Areas
while customers or patrons are present. All patrons shall be appropriately draped so as to cover
Spedfled Anatomical Areas while receiving massage services.
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doe 7
G. No Massage Establishment shall be kept open for business between the hours of midnight
and 7:00 a.m.
H. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold, served, fumished, kept, or possessed on the premises
of any Massage Establishment, as the premises are defined in the Massage Establishment Permit.
5.22.080 Display of Permits and Licenses.
The owner or operator of a Massage Establishment shall display the Permit and the Permit of
each and every Massage Practitioner employed or doing business in the establishment in an open and
conspicuous place on the premises. Passport-size and type color photographs of the Licensee and
Permittee shall be affixed to the respective Licenses and permits on display pursuant to this Section.
5.22.090 Inspection by Officials.
Any and all investigating officials of the City shall have the right to enter Massage
Establishments from time to time during regular business hours to make reasonable inspections to
observe and enforce compliance with building, fire, electrical, plumbing, or health regulations, and to
ascertain whether there is compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. No such inspections shall be
done in a manner that unreasonably interferes with the legitimate business operations of the fadlity.
5.22.100 Notice of Violation.
A. Whenever the City conducts an inspection of a Massage Establishment and finds that any
provision of this Chapter has been violated, the Director shall give notice of such violation by means of
an inspection report or other written notice. In any such notification, the Director shall:
1. Set forth the specific violation or violations found;
2. Establish a spedtic and reasonable period of time for the correction of the violation
or violations. If the Director determines that the violation or violations are minor in nature, the Director
may issue a warning to the permittee or licensee that any further violation of this Chapter may result in
the filing of a complaint for revocation or suspension of the Permit or permit;
3. State that failure to comply with any notice issued in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter may result in the Director filing a complaint for revocation or suspension of the Permit
or License.
B. Violations of Sections 5.22.070 and 5.22.080, whether or not a Permit was issued pursuant
to the provisions of Chapter 5.22 or 5.23 of the Temecula Municipal Code, may be cited pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 1.21 of the Temecula Munidpal Code. Every day that these provisions are
violated shall be a separate violation of this Chapter. Every violation of this Chapter shall be punishable
as a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding these provisions, any violation of the provisions of Sections
5.22.070 and 5.22.080 may also be prosecuted under the provisions of Section 5.22.110.
5.22.110
Revocation or Suspension of a Massage Establishment
Permit.
After an investigation, notice, and headng, any Permit issued for a Massage Establishment may
be revoked or suspended by the Director where any of the following is found:
A. The permittee has violated any provisions of this Chapter; or,
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doe
8
B. The permittee is a person who has engaged in disqualifying conduct as described in
Paragraph J of Section 5.22.010; or,
C. The permittee has failed to comply with one or more of the facilities and operations
requirements of Section 5.22.070; or,
D. The permittee has failed to comply with the requirements of Section 5.22.080; or,
E. The permittee has engaged in fraud, misrepresentation, or false statement in conducting the
Massage Establishment; or,
F. The permittee has continued to operate the Massage Establishment after the Permit has
been suspended; or,
G. The permittee has allowed a person to work as a massage practitioner who:
1. Does not have a valid Massage License as defined in Chapter 5.23 of the Temecula
Municipal Code; or,
2. Has engaged in conduct or has been convicted of an offense described in Paragraph
J of Section 5.22.010 when the permittee has actual or constructive knowledge of such conduct or
conviction.
5.22.120
Hearing on Revocation or Suspension of a Massage
Establishment Permit or Massage Practitioner License.
A. Upon determining that grounds for revocation or suspension exist, as set forth in Sections
5.22.11 O, the Director shall furnish written notice of the proposed revocation or suspension of the Permit
to the Permittee. The Notice shall contain a summary of the reasons for the proposed revocation or
suspension and a statement that the Permittee has ten (10) calendar days of the date on the notice to
request a hearing under the provisions of this Section. This Notice shall be delivered to the Permittee
in the following manner:
]. By posting the Notice at the location of the Massage Establishment;
2. By sending the Notice by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Permittee
as that name and address appear on the Permit; and,
3. By sending the Notice by regular mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Permittee
as that name and address appear on the Permit.
B. If a request for a hearing is filed within the required time period, the City Manager shall
appoint a Headng Officer, within five (5) business days after receiving the request, to conduct a headng.
The Headng Officer shall be a professional in the field of dispute resolution. The Hearing Officer shall
schedule the headng within twenty (20) calendar days of the City Managers appointment.
C. Notice of time and place of the hearing shall be given to the Permittee by personal service
or via certified mail and regular mail, postage prepaid, at least ten (10) business days in advance of the
date set for the hearing.
D. The Hearing Officer shall conduct the hearing, receive oral and wdtten testimony and other
evidence, and subsequently prepare findings of fact. At the hearing, the Permittee and the Director shall
be entitled to present relevant evidence, testify under oath, and call witnesses who shall testify under
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doc
9
oath. The Hearing Officer shall receive such evidence as would be relied upon by persons in the
conduct of sedous affairs. The Headng Officer shall not be bound by the statutory rules of evidence in
the conduct of the hearing, except that hearsay evidence may not be the sole basis for the determination
of whether an ultimate fact exists.
E. Within ten (10) business days of the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall
submit the evidence received and his or her written findings of fact to the City Manager.
F. Within ten (10) business days thereafter, the City Manager shall hold a hearing and shall
decide whether the grounds for revocation or suspension under Section 5.22.110 exist. The City
Manager's decision shall be based only on the evidence received by the Hearing Officer, the findings
of fact of the Hearing Officer, and the written and oral arguments of the Director and the Permittee.
Evidence which was not introduced at the hearing before the Hearing Officer shall not be received or
considered by the City Manager.
G. The City Manager's derision shall be in wdting and shall contain written findings of fact and
his or her conclusions of whether any grounds for revocation or suspension of the Permit exist. The
decision of the City Manager shall be final and conclusive and is not be appealable to the City Council.
H. The City Manager's decision on the revocation or suspension of the permit shall be served
upon the Permittee by personal service or via certified mail and regular mail, postage prepaid, at the
address of the Permittee contained in the Permit. The City Manager's derision shall be effective upon
personal service or, if service is by mail, then two (2) business days following the deposit of the derision
with the U. S. Postal Service.
5.22.130 Return of Permit.
In the event that a Permit is suspended, revoked or invalidated, the Permittee shall forward their
copy of the Permit to the City official who issued it not later than the end of the third (3rd) business day
after notification of the cancellation, suspension, revocation or invalidation. The failure to return a
Massage Establishment Permit to the City within three (3) business days after notification shall constitute
a violation of Section 5.22.020.
5.22.140 Reapplication After Denial or Revocation.
A. An applicant for a Permit under this Chapter whose application for such Permit has been
denied may not reapply for such Permit for a period of five (5) years from the date such notice of denial
was deposited in the mail or received by the applicant, whichever occurs first. However a reapplication
prior to the termination of five (5) years may be made if accompanied by evidence that the ground or
grounds for denial of the application or revocation no longer exist.
B. A permittee under this Chapter whose Permit has been revoked, canceled, or terminated
may not reapply for such Permit for a pedod of five (5) years from the date such revocation, cancellation,
or termination. However a reapplication prior to the termination of five (5) years may be made if
accompanied by clear and convincing evidence that the ground or grounds for denial of the application
no longer exist.
5.22.150 Business Name.
No person permitted to operate a Massage Establishment shall operate under any name or
conduct business under any name or designation not spedfled in the Permit.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massag~ Ordinance=.doc
10
5.22.160 Business Name Change.
Upon a proposed change of location of a Massage Establishment, an application shall be made
to the Director, and such application shall be granted, subject to and provided all applicable provisions
of this Chapter are complied with, and a change of location fee in an amount established by a resolution
of the City Council to pay the costs of investigation and report has been paid to the City.
5.22.170 Sale or Transfer of Massage Establishment Interest.
A sale or transfer of any interest in a Massage Establishment, which interest would be reported
as required in this Chapter upon application for a Massage Establishment Permit, shall be reported to
the Director within ten (10) days subsequent to the sale or transfer. The Director shall investigate any
person receiving any interest in a Massage Establishment as a result of such sale or transfer, and if such
person satisfies the requirements relating to Massage Establishment Permit applicants, the existing
Permit shall be endorsed to indude such person. A fee as set forth by resolution of the City Coundl shall
be paid to the City for the investigation by the Director necessitated by each such sale or transfer.
5.22.180 No Refund of Application or Processing Fees.
No refund or rebate of any permit related fees shall be allowed by the reason of the fact that the
permittee discontinues an activity for which a Permit is required pursuant to this Chapter, or that the
Permit is suspended or revoked."
Section 3. 'Etle 5, "Business Permits and Regulations," of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended by adding Chapter 5.23, "Massage Practitioners," to the Temecula Municipal Code
to read as follows:
"CHAPTER 5.23
MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS
5.23.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this Chapter, only the words, terms, and phrases set forth in this Section
shall have the meanings herein set forth unless the context deady requires a different meaning.
A. 'Accredited School of MassaQe' means a permitted educational enterprise accredited to
provide bona fide education in the field of massage. Such accreditation must be awarded by the
governmental agency having jurisdiction upon these schools.
B. 'Director means the Director of Community Development or his or her designee.
C. 'Employee' means and includes every owner, partner, manager, supervisor, and worker,
whether paid or not, who renders massage services or activities that further massage services of any
nature in the operation of a Massage Establishment;
D. 'Permit' as used in this Chapter shall mean the Permit to operate an Independent
Practitioner's Massage Establishment.
E. 'Massage' means any method of pressure on, or friction against, or stroking, kneading,
rubbing, tapping, pounding, vibrating, or stimulating the internal or external parts of the human body with
the hands or with the aid of any mechanical or electrical apparatus, or other appliances or devices, with
or without such supplementary aids as rubbing alcohol, liniment, antiseptic, oil, powder, cream, lotion,
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFrS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinanc¢.doc
11
ointment or other similar preparations, including, without limitation, shiatsu, acupressure, or similar
activities.
F. 'Massa¢ie Establishment' means any business organization having a fLxed place of business
where any individuals, either as employees or as participants in a business organization, including but
not limited to a firm, assodation, partnership, corporation, joint venture, limited liability company, or other
combination of individuals, engages in, conducts, cardes on, permits or suffers to be engaged in,
conducted, or carded on for consideration, massages or health treatments involving massage. Massage
Establishments may be in located in (i) space entirely devoted to a Massage Establishment, (ii) within
other types of businesses subject to the provisions of this Chapter, or (iii) conducted upon the premises
of a client.
G. 'Independent Practitioner' means a massage practitioner, licensed subject to the applicable
regulations, who is the sole operator and massage practitioner at a massage establishment that meets
all the following requirements:
1. All massage services are provided only by the licensed independent massage
practitioner who either owns or directly leases the facility; and,
2. The massage services are not provide in conjunction with, or share any space or
support staff with any other independent massage practitioner or massage establishment; and,
3. The business space owned or leased by the independent practitioner may not be
shared or jointly utilized by any other massage practitioner or massage establishment; and,
4. The total floor space for the independent practitioner should generally not exceed
one thousand (1,000) square feet.
H. 'Massa.cle Practitioner' means any person who administers massages to another person for
any consideration whatsoever, has completed at least 100 hours of education through an accredited
school of massage.
I. 'License' means the approval to engage in the activities of a Massage Practitioner as
required by this Chapter.
J. 'Person' means any individual, firm, association, partnership, corporation, joint venture,
limited liability company or partnership, or combination of individuals.
K. 'Person Who has En.qa.~ed in Disclualifyin.~ Conduct' means a person who:
1. Within twenty (20) years immediately preceding the date of filing of the application
in question or, in the case of revocation or suspension proceedings, within twenty (20) years of the date
of notice of headng pursuant to Section 5.22.120, has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction
of:
a. Any misdemeanor or felony offense which relates directly to the operation
of a Massage Establishment, or effected public safety, whether as a Massage Establishment owner or
operator, or Massage Practitioner; or,
b. Any felony, the commission of which occurred on the premises of a
Massage Establishment; or,
2. Within twenty (20) years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the
application in question or, in the case of revocation or suspension proceedings, within twenty (20) years
\\TEMEC_FS20I\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinancc.doc 12
of the date of notice of revocation or suspension headng, whichever is applicable, has had any Massage
Establishment, operator, Massage Practitioner, or other massage related license or permit issued by
the State of California, or any county or city revoked; or,
3. Within twenty (20) years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the
application, or in the case of revocation or suspension proceedings, within twenty (20) years of the date
of notice of revocation or suspension hearing, whichever is applicable, has been convicted in a court
of competent jurisdiction of:
a. Any violation of Califomia Penal Code Sections 266(h), 266(I), 315, 316,
318, or Section 674(b), as amended, which are hereby incorporated by reference; or,
above; or,
b. Conspiracy or attempt to commit any such offense defined in subsection a.
c. Any offense in a jurisdiction outside the State of California which is the
equivalent of any of the aforesaid offenses; or,
d. Any felony offense involving the sale of a controlled substance specified in
Califomia Health and Safety Code Sections 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 11056; as amended, which
are hereby incorporated by reference; or,
e. Has been found guilty of or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to any lesser-
included offense of the violations identified in Subsections a. and/or d. above; or,
4. Is required to register under the provisions of California Penal Code Section 290; or,
5. Has been subjected to a permanent injunction against the conducting or maintaining
of a nuisance pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 11225 through 11235 or any similar provisions
of law in a jurisdiction outside the State of California.
L. 'Spedfled Anatomical Areas' shall include the following human anatomical areas: genitals,
pubic regions, buttocks, anuses, or female breasts below a point immediately above the top or side of
the areolae.
5.23.020 Massage Practitioner License Required.
It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor, subject to punishment in accordance with Section
1.20.010 et seq. of this Code, for any person to act as a Massage Practitioner unless such person holds
a valid license issued by the Director, unless such person, owner or operator is exempted from the
provisions of this Chapter by Section 5.23.025. A License for a Massage Practitioner, or a Permit to
operate an Independent Practitioners Establishment shall be valid for a period of one (1) year
commencing at the date of issuance.
5.23.025 Exemptions.
The requirements of this Chapter shall not apply to the following classes of individuals, while
engaged in the performance of the duties of their respective professions:
A. Physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, or osteopaths who are duly licensed to practice their
respective professions in the State of California under the provisions of the Business and Professions
Code, while performing activities encompassed by such professional license; or,
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~DEPTS\PLANNING\Final DraR Massage Ordinance.doe
13
B. Nurses or physical therapists who are duly licensed to practice their professions in the State
of California under the provisions of Business and Professions Code, while performing activities
encompassed by such professional license; or,
C. Other health care personnel engaged in the healing arts as regulated and licensed by
Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code; or
D. Athletic trainers certified by the State of California performing training services at bona fide
professional, amateur or school athletic events or practices.
5.23.030 Requirements for Massage Practitioner License
Applications.
A. Any application for a Massage Practitioner license shall be made on forms approved by the
Director. The applicant shall furnish the following information:
1. Applicant's height, weight, eye color, and hair color;
2. Two (2) prints of a recent passport-sized type of color photograph of the applicant;
3. A complete set of fingerprints;
4. Social security number;
5. Driver's License number, if any,
6. All criminal convictions or offenses described in Paragraph K of Section 5.23.010;
whether the applicant is required to register under the provisions of California Penal Code Section 290,
or any similar provisions of law in a jurisdiction outside the State of California;
7. Reasonable proof that the applicant is at least eighteen (18) years of age;
8. The previous residence addresses of applicant, if any, for a pedod of eight (8) years
immediately prior to the date of the application and the dates of residence at each;
9. Business, occupation, or employment history of the applicant for the five (5) years
immediately preceding the date of the application;
10. The name and address of the establishment where the applicant is to be employed
or will engage in the practice of massage if self-employed; and the name of the owner operator of the
same;
11. Reasonable proof of graduation from a school approved by the Council for Private
Post Secondary Vocational Education (CPPVE) or an equivalent governmental body in other States
according to the standards set forth in Paragraph H of Section 5,23.010;
12. Certificate from a medical doctor stating that the applicant has, within thirty (30) days
immediately prior to the filing of the application, been examined and found to be free from tuberculosis;
13. Authorization for the City, its employees and agents to seek information and conduct
an investigation, including, but not limited to, a records check of prior convictions, into the truth of the
statements set forth in the application and the qualifications of the application for the License and/or
Permit;
\\TEMEC_FS20I\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doc 14
and;
14. Such other information as may reasonably be deemed necessary by the Director;
15. Statement dated wdtten by the applicant made under penalty of perjury under the
laws of the State of California that the information furnished is true and correct.;
B. Notwithstanding the fact that an application filed hereunder may be a 'public record' under
Government Code Section 6250 et seq., certain portions of such application contain information vital to
the effective administration and enforcement of the permitting scheme established herein which is
personal, pdvate, confidential, or the disclosure of which could expose the applicant to a risk of harm.
Those portions of the application which are not subject to disclosure are: the applicant's residence
address and telephone number, the applicant's date of birth and/or age, the applicant's ddver's license
and/or Social Security Number, and/or personal financial data. The City Council in adopting the
application and permit system set forth herein has determined in accordance with Government Code
Section 6255 that the public interest in disclosure of the information set forth above is outweighed by the
public interest in achieving compliance with this Chapter by ensudng that the applicant's pdvacy,
confidentially, or security interests are protected. The City Clerk shall cause to be redacted from any
copy of a completed license application made available to any member of the public, the information set
forth above.
C. In addition to the applicable requirements described above, all applications for the renewal
of a Massage Practitioner License shall be accompanied by evidence that the continuing education
requirement has been satisfied.
5.23.040
Massage Practitioner License and Independent
Practitioner's Permit Application Fees.
Any application for a License to be a Massage Practitioner or a Permit for an Independent
Practitioner shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee in an amount established by resolution of the
City Council. The application fee shall be used to pay the costs of the investigation, any reports, and
related application processing issues.
5.23.050 Approval or Denial of a Massage Practitioner License.
A. Within forty-five (45) calendar days following receipt of a completed application and
verification of the information contained in application, the Director shall either issue the license for one
of the three types of massage practitioners identified in Paragraph H of Section 5.23.010, depending
upon their qualifications, or mail a written statement of the reasons for denial thereof. For the purposes
of the timeline identified in this section, the forty-five (45) calendar day period does not begin until the
City has received the required law enforcement reports. A Massage Practitioner License shall be issued
to any person who has fulfilled the requirements of Paragraph H of Section 5.23.010 and all other
applicable provisions of this Chapter unless grounds for denial of such license are found to exist.
B. The Director shall deny a License to any applicant where any of the following conditions
exist:
1. The applicant has made one (1) or more material misstatements in the application
for a license; or,
2. The applicant is a person who has engaged in disqualifying conduct in the past
twenty (20) years, as described in Paragraph K of Section 5.23.010, or has violated any provision of this
Chapter, or of any similar ordinance, law, rule, or regulation of another public agency which regulates
the operation of massage practitioners; or,
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEFrS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doc 15
3. The applicant has failed to meet the training requirements described in Section
5.23.030; or,
4. The applicant has failed to furnish an appropriate medical doctor's certificate as
required by Section 5.23.030; or,
5. The applicant has failed to provide reasonable proof that they are at least 18 year
of age.
C. Any appeal of the decision by the Director to deny a Massage Practitioner License or an
Independent Practitioners Permit shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.22.120
of the Temecula Munidpal Code.
5.23.070 Change of Business Location.
Changes in the employment location for any licensed Massage Practitioner must be reported
to the City within five (5) days of said change.
5.23.080 Independent Practitioner Permits.
The purpose of this Section is to enable an independently operating massage practitioner to
reasonably operate their own solely operated massage business without having to go through all of the
provisions of Chapter 5.22 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
A. The Director may approve a Permit for an Independent Practitioner if the following
requirements are met:
1. The applicant holds a valid Massage Practitioner License; and,
2. The applicant holds a valid City Business License; and,
3. The applicant has not engaged in disqualifying conduct in the past twenty (20) years,
as described in Paragraph K of Section 5.23.010, or has violated any provision of this Chapter, or of any
similar ordinance, law, rule, or regulation of another public agency which regulates the operation of
massage practitioners; and,
4. The applicant has signed a statement acknowledging, and agreeing to comply with,
the requirements of Sections 5.22.070 through 5.22.090 governing the operation of Massage
Establishments.
B. The provisions to deny an application for an Independent Practitioners Permit shall be the
same as those described in Paragraph B of Section 5.23.050.
5.23.090 Notice of Violation
For Independent Practitioners Permits, violations of Sections 5.22.070 through 5.22.090, may
be cited pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1.21 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Every day that
these provisions are violated shall be a separate violation of this Chapter. Every violation of this Chapter
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of the provisions
of Sections 5.22.070 through 5.22.090 may be prosecuted under the provisions of Section 5.22.110.
\WEMEC_YS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordirmnce.doc
16
5.23.100 Revocation or Suspension of a Massage Practitioner
License or Independent Practitioner Permit.
After an investigation, notice, and hearing, any Massage Practitioner License and/or Independent
Practitioner's Permit may be revoked or suspended by the Director where it is found that at least one
of the following has occurred:
A. The licensee/permittee has violated any provision of this Chapter; or,
B. The licensee/permittee is a person who has engaged in disqualifying conduct as described
in Paragraph K of Section 5.23.010; or,
C. The licensee/permittee has continued to function as a massage practitioner or independent
practitioner after the License or Permit has been suspended; or,
D. The licensee/permittee has made a material misstatement in the application for a permit.
5.23.110 Hearing on Revocation or Suspension of Massage
Practitioner License and/or Independent Practitioner Permit.
The hearing concerning the revocation or suspension of any Massage Practitioner License and/or
Independent Practitioner Permit shall comply with the provisions of Section 5.22.120 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.
5.23.120 Reapplication After Denial or Revocation.
A. An applicant for a License or Permit under this Chapter whose application has been
denied may not reapply for a pedod of five (5) years from the date such notice of denial was deposited
in the mail or received by the applicant, whichever occurred first. However, a reapplication pdor to the
end of five (5) year period may be made if accompanied by evidence that the ground or grounds for
denial of the application or revocation no longer exist.
B. A Licensee/Permittee under this Chapter whose license or permit has been revoked or
terminated may not reapply for a period of five (5) years from the date such revocation or termination.
However, a reapplication pdcr to the termination of five (5) years may be made if accompanied by dear
and convincing evidence that the ground or grounds for denial of the application no longer exist.
5.23.130 Return of License and/or Permit.
In the event that a License and/or Permit is suspended, revoked or invalidated, the
Licensee/Permittee shall forward the original copy of the License and/or Permit to the officer who issued
it not later than the end of the third (3rd) business day after notification of the suspension, revocation or
invalidation.
5.23.140 No Refund of Application Fees
No refund or rebate of any License or Permit related fees shall be allowed by the reason of the
fact that the licensee/permittee discontinues an activity for which a License or Permit is required
pursuant to this Chapter, or that the License or Permit is suspended or revoked."
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinance.doe
17
Section 4. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Riverside County Ordinance No. 596 as
adopted by the City is hereby repealed. As a result, Section 1.08.010, "County Ordinances Adopted by
Reference," of the Temecula Munidpal Code is hereby amended by the deletion of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 596. References in Section 1.08.010 to County Ordinances in the 590 to 600 sedes shall
read as follows:
"... 591 through 593, 595, 597 through 598, ..."
Section 5. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The adoption of this ordinance consists of regulations
to oversee a medical/business practice. These activities will take place at previously developed
fadlities. Because the regulation of massage businesses and professionals is not a project under CEQA
and could not have an impact on the environment, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from
environmental review pursuant to Subsections 15061(b)(1) and (3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 6. SEVERABILITY. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this
ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE AND CERTIFICATION. This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the
passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published
and posted in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this __
day of ,1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Coundl on the __ day of ,1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula on the __
day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordiaanc¢.doc
18
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\Final Draft Massage Ordinancc.doc
19
ITEM 28
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager;'''7~/%'''
July 27, 1999
Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Permitting, Approval, Development,
and Placement of Additional Wireless Communications Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING AN EXTENSION OF ORDINANCE 99-17 WHICH
ESTABLISHED A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING,
APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT AND PLACEMENT OF ALL FORMS
OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
BACKGROUND: At their June 22, 1999 meeting the City Council adopted Ordinance 99-
17, an interim and urgency ordinance prohibiting additional wireless telecommunications
facilities until after the City has had an opportunity to prepare additional locally appropriate
standards and requirements.
The City Council received the report from the City Attorney on the City's progress and
proposed course of action at the July 13, 1999 City Council meeting. The ordinance attached
with this Agenda Report will continue the prohibition until June of 2000. Staff expects to have
a permanent ordinance finalized and presented to the City Council for consideration prior to this
date. A copy of the extension ordinance is contained in Attachment No. 1.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Draft ordinance - Page 2
R:~STAFFRP'I'~Urgency Antenna Moratorium Extension CC.doc
1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
DRAFT ORDINANCE
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTS~LANNING\STAFFRPT\Urgency Antenna Moratorium Extension CC.doc
2
ORDINANCE NO. 99
AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN EXTENSION OF
ORDINANCE 99-17 A PROHIBITION ON THE
PERMITTING, APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT AND
PLACEMENT OF ALL FORMS OF WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) In response to its specific findings that determined that the City of Temecula was
subject to a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare, the City
Council of the City of Temecula adopted its Ordinance No. 99-17 on June 22,1999. The
specific findings made by the City Council are:
(a) The City of Temecula has experienced an increase in the development
of, and requests to develop, wireless telecommunication facilities. The City has experienced
development of a wide vadety of facility type and design, including, but not limited to, building
mounted antenna arrays, monopole mounted antenna arrays, stealth/disguise types of
monopoles and roof top mountained antenna arrays. The City currently has no zoning and
design standards that are reasonably appropriate and applicable to the review and analysis of
the vadous types of wireless communication facilities and the siting issues related to the
structures.
(b) The City of Temecula's General Plan, when adopted, did not anticipate
the scope of wireless telecommunications present in today's marketplace. Accordingly, the
General Plan's provisions regarding public utilities and institutional uses does not adequately
address the circumstances presented by current telecommunication development issues,
including, but not limited to siting and design factors.
(c) The City Council of the City of Temecula has determined that the lack of
the adequate general plan, zoning and design standards referenced above has, and will
continue to, negatively impact the health, safety and welfare of the City. This lack of adequate
land use regulations, including the lack of adequate standards related to the design, location,
size and placement of such facilities, has and will result in: the wasting of resources by
involved parties; confusion and uncertainty among applicants, the public and the City as to the
review criteda applicable to the siting design and regulation of such facilities; the jeopardizing
of property values and further causes a negative impact on community attractiveness and
aesthetics, including, but not limited to surrounding property view impairment, the over-
development of parcels, the over-concentration of wireless telecommunication facilities and
inappropriate or undesirable "disguising" method.ologies. Individually, and in their totality,
these facts and circumstances support this City Council imposing an intedm ordinance
prohibiting the further issuance of permits, approvals, and the development and placement of
wireless telecommunication facilities until such time as the City has reviewed and revised the
City's general plan and zoning ordinance to appropriately regulate these facilities.
R:ords/ord7/27/99 I
(d) This City Council further finds that the City continues to receive inquiries
and interest in the further development and placement of additional wireless
telecommunications facilities. This demand for development, in light of the lack of appropriate
general plan and zoning standards presents a circumstance that is a public urgency and which
requires the immediate protection of the City's health, safety and welfare. The City council,
after review and consideration of all the facts and issues discussed herein, finds and
determines that the permitting, approval, development and placement of wireless
telecommunication facilities shall be immediately prohibited in the City until the City has taken
adequate time to develop standards and regulations for such facilities. The standards and
regulation shall regulate the design, configuration, location and co-location, size, placement
aesthetic characteristics and all other land-use factors relating to such facilities. This
immediate prohibition is necessary to prevent the negative impacts discussed in the foregoing
sections from further proliferating negatively impacting the City's health, safety and welfare.
(e) All preconditions to the adoption of this intedm ordinance as an urgency
measure under Califomia Govemment Code Section 36937(b) and as an extension of an
intedm zoning ordinance under California Government Code Section 65858 have occurred as
required by law.
(ii) Pursuant to the requirements of Califomia Govemment Code Sec. 65858(d) on July 13,
1999 this City Council issued a wdtten report describing the measures taken to respond to the
conditions that led to the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-17.
(iii) Pursuant to the authority set forth in Califomia Govemment Code Sec. 65858(a) this
City Council intends to extend the intedm ordinance established in Ordinance 99-17 for 10
months and fifteen days because the circumstances supporting Ordinance No. 99-17 continue
unabated and require further effort to resolve.
(iv) All preconditions to the extension of the intedm ordinance set forth in Ordinance No.
99-17 by ordinance as an urgency measure under Califomia Govemment Code Sec. 36937(b)
and as an intedm ordinance under Califomia Govemment Code Sec. 65858 have occurred as
required by law.
B. Ordinance.
The city council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows:
Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this
Ordinance, which recitals are hereby wholly incorporated by reference herein.
Section 2. This City Council intends this Intedm Ordinance to be immediately
effective under Califomia Govemment Code Section 36937(b) and declares that the facts set
forth hereinabove constitute the declaration of urgency required as a precondition to the
adoption of an urgency ordinance by said Section 36937(b). Further, this City Council intends
this enactment to be an extension, for 10 months and 15 days, of Intedm Ordinance No. 99-17,
effective immediately, under the authority of California Govemment Code Section 65858
serving to prohibit the permitting, approval development and placement of wireless
telecommunication facilities. This intedm ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 10
months and 15 days after its adoption. The Planning Department and City Clerk shall cause
R:ords/ord7/27/99 2
notice, pursuant to the requires of California Govemment Code Section 65090 to be given and
a public headng to be held pdor to the lapse of said pedod to consider the extension of the
intedm ordinance for an additional year, if necessary. Further, the Planning Department shall
preepare and submit the report required by California Government Code Section 65858(d) to
the City Council in a time frame sufficient to allow the City Council to review and issue the
same as required by law.
Section 3. All wireless telecommunication facilities that have been granted
approvals and entitlements for the development and placement of such facilities pdor to the
date this intedm ordinance is adopted shall be allowed to proceed with development and
operation notwithstanding this enactment.
Section4. The Planning Department is directed to continue and/or
commence the preparation of general plan and zoning ordinance amendments that establish
standards, beneficial to the needs of this City, for the regulation of all aspects of wireless
telecommunication facilities. This City Council declares it is its goal to accomplish the
preparation and adoption of the general plan and zoning regulations in an expedited manner
that will result in the least delay upon the further .development of wireless telecommunicetion
systems. Further, to the extend feasible, the policies set forth in the guidelines for moratoda,
as promulgated by the Federal Communication Commission's Local and State Government
Advisory Committee shall be implemented by City staff as regards involving wireless service
providers in the process of developing revisions to the general plan and zoning ordinance.
Section 5. This City Council has determined that the adoption of this
urgency and intedm ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to
projects that have the potential for causing a significant impact on the environment (Title 14
California Code of Regulations 15061(b)(3).) This City Council hereby determines that the
prohibition set forth in this intedm ordinance has no possibility of having or causing a
significant effect on the environment, thus removing this action from the application of CEQA.
Section 6. Penalties for Violation of Ordinance.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any
provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted.
Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to
comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00),
or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each
and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation-shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense
for each and every day or any portion thereof dudng which any violation of any of the provisions
of this Ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or
corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance.
Section 7. Civil Remedies Available.
The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall
constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of
restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for
the abatement of such nuisances.
R:ords/ord7/27/99 3
Section 8. Severability.
The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this
Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27t" day of July, 1999.
Steven J. Ford
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:ordstord7/27/99 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. was duly adopted and passed as an Urgency Ordinance at a
regular meeting of the City Council on July 27, 1999 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: -None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R :ords/ord7/27/99 5
ITEM 29
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA E
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
James B. O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
July 27, 1999
Infestation of the insect-Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider funding in an amount not to exceed
$25,000 to the University of California Riverside (UCR) for immediate research towards the recent
infestation of this insect in our local wineries
BACKGROUND: The Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter is an insect that has recently invaded
California and locally throughout our local wineries. On Tuesday, July 20,1999, Councilman Stone
and City Staff met with members of the Vintner's community to discuss this very real threat to our
economy.
In this meeting, staff learned this insect has and continues to create serious problems in both
agricultural and ornamental plantings. The greatest threats surround their ability to spread the
plant pathogenic bacterium Xylella fastidosa, which induces Pierce's disease in grapevines, almond
leaf scorch disease, and a new disease known as oleander leaf scorch.
Over a century ago, before the urbanization of Orange County, Pierce's disease decimated an
extensive grape industry destroying 40,000 acres of grapevines and closing 50 wineries. Currently
the Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter is responsible for outbreaks of Pieroe's disease within many of
our 14 winedes here in Temecula, where major outbreaks were previously unknown. If this disease
continues to spread, local Vintners predict this will destroy all vineyards within a 3-year period.
However, this problem is not restricted to Riverside County vineyards but has affected citrus and
vineyards as well in the counties of Orange, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, and Kern.
The importance of agriculture and especially the wine industry to California is critical to economies
at all levels of government.
In addition to agricultural crops, an important part of the landscape in the southwest will be lost if
oleander leaf scorch continues to spread, and resistant oleander varieties are not found. Oleander
is found in 20% of all home gardens in California, and is a mainstay of landscapes in shopping
centers, parks, and golf courses. The California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS)
maintains oleander in over 2,100 miles of freeway median. It is estimated that CALTRANS alone
stands to suffer at least a $52 million loss if oleander on highway plantings is lost.
Currently research is underway at the University of California at both Riverside and Berkeley in an
effort to identify methods of managing the insect populations and reducing the spread of this
disease.
Funding to support such research and short-term Pest Management Programs is currently being
discussed at the County Board of Supervisors, however, a great deal of assistance is now needed
to continue this effort.
FISCAL IMPACT: Pending City Council action, an appropriation in an amount not to exceed
$25,000 would be required from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance to the City Council
departmental budget.
ITEM 3O
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY c//_~)/~
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
N.,)2/1William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
Award of Construction Contract for Rancho California Road at 1-15 Ramp
Improvements, Project No. PW95-12 (PW98-08)
PREPARED BY:
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Receive an oral report on the bids received July 27, 1999.
,
Award a construction contract for the Rancho California Road at 1-15 Ramp Improvements,
Project No. PW95-12 (PW98-08) and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: On May 11, 1999, the City Council authorize the Public Works Department to
solicit construction bids. In order to allow sufficient time for contractors to prepare their bid without
impacting our schedule, the City Council is being asked to award this project immediately after
receiving the bids this date. This project will be constructing the following items:
1. Widen the southbound on-ramp to two lanes at Rancho California Road.
Modify the median island on Rancho California Road between Front Street and the
southbound ramps. This modification will extend and double storage for the westbound
left turn pocket at Front Street. The south side of the median island will be widened and
all distributed landscaping will be replaced.
The striping between the north and south bound ramps will be re-striped to provide two
westbound left turn lanes for the southbound ramp and an additional eastbound through
lane west of the northbound ramps.
4. Widen the northbound on-ramp to two lanes at Rancho California Road.
Widen the north side of Rancho California Road between the northbound on-ramp and Ynez
Road. This widening will provide three through lanes, one optional through and right turn
lane, and an exclusive right turn lane east of the northbound ramp.
The additional on-ramp improvements will provide more capacity to the on-ramps, which will in turn
allow more signal time for east/west traffic movements and for off-ramp unloading.
l
R:\AGDRPT\99\O727\PW95-12{98-OS),AWD .DOC
The engineer's estimate for the above improvement is $575,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded primarily by Measure "A" loan from RCTC. Additional
funds will be appropriated from Capital Project Reserves, Development Impact Fees, and RDA.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Contract Form
R:\AGDRPT\99\0727\PW95-12(98-08).AWD.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT PW95-12
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD A T I- f 5 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of JULY, 1999, by
and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW00-00, RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD AT 1-15 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of
California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of
the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as
wdtten and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California
Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter,
"Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions,
and Technical Specifications for PROJECT PW95-12, RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD AT 1-
15 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from
the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Ovedand Avenue
Los Angeles, Califomia 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT PW95-12,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD AT 1-15 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents descdbe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:~:ip%proiects~pw98\pw98-08\CONTRACTRAMPS.doc
,
,
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT PW95-12, RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD AT 1-15 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of:
DOLLARS and
CENTS ($ ), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Thirty (30)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY, with an
additional 120-day maintenance period. Construction shall not commence until bonds
and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
A,
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms
provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of
the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\cip~rolects~w98~w98-08\CONTRACTRAMPSdoc
10.
the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00-$500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\cip~projects\ow98\pw98-08\CONTRACTRAMPS .dec
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing
wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section
1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The
CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\cip~proiects~pw98~ow98-08\CONTRACTRAMPS.doc
18,
19.
20.
21.
22.
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attomey fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 R:%cip%proiects%pw98\ow98-08\CONTRACTRAMPS.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above wdtten.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
Name
Address
City
Phone
By:
Print or type NAME
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Print or type TITLE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R:\cip~projects\pw98~pw98-08\CONTRACTRAMPS .doc
ITEM 31
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
Nicholas Road Sidewalk Project
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file a status report regarding the
Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project.
BACKGROUND: The owner of the property at the northeast corner of Nicholas
Road and Winchester Road has agreed to construct the sidewalk fronting their property in
advance of their development activity to accommodate the request of the City Council. Mr. Mike
Perry of D.M.W.R., Ltd. has indicated that he is working with Lucardi Construction to get bids
and a schedule by Friday, July 23, 1999. They will be obtaining the necessary Encroachment
Permits by the end of the month and should be under construction the first part of August.
They have agreed to construct the sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalk on Nicholas
Road with the understanding that the City of Temecula would reimburse them for work that is
not a part of their frontage. That would include the portion in front of the Chaparral Self-Storage
facility.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
r:\agdrpt\99/O727/nicolassidewalk/ajp
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City M n
a ager
July 27, 1999
Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department in the month of June 1999.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
New Cases
The Division received 39 new applications for administrative and other minor cases and home
occupations and 8 new applications for public hearings during the month of June. The new public
hearing cases are as follows:
Change of Zone 3
General Plan Amendment with Specific Plan 1
Minor Conditional Use Permit 1
Development Plan with CEQA 1
Revised Tentative Subdivision (After 2 years) 1
Tentative Tract - Residential Not R2/R4 1
Pre-applications
Saturn Auto Sales and Service (12,000 sq. ft.) -Ynez Road and Solana Way was submitted
on May 19, 1999. The pre-application meeting was held on June 10, 1999.
Home Depot and Shopping Center (276,000 sq. ft) - northwest corner of Meadows Parkway
and Highway 79 South was submitted on June 10, 1999 for pre-application review.
Status of Fast Track Proiects
The City's award-winning Fast Track process provides a way for major busines'ses relocating to
or expanding in Temecula to get their facilities constructed and occupied in the shortest possible
time. The current Fast Track projects are as follows:
R:\MONTHLY.RPT~1999\June 99.doc
1
Burkey Machine & Tool - Development Plan for new 16,000 square feet machine and tool
facility with 27 employees at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Colt Court. The
Planning Commission approved the project unanimously at the June 16, 1999 hearing.
Status of Maior Proiects
Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and get the following cases
ready for public hearing before the Community Development Director or Planning Commission:
Rebel Rent's new facility on Winchester Road in the Westside Business Center. Staff is
awaiting second resubmittal from the applicant. Several of staffs original comments need
to be addressed from the original DRC comments.
Rancho Community Church expansion on Vallejo Avenue. This project has been put on
hold by the applicant.
Tentative Parcel Map 28627, the Margarita Canyon Property. Staff is waiting for the
applicant to rectify issues raised by Caltrans, and address issues raised in the project's
traffic study.
,k
Wolf Valley Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: Tentative Planning
Commission Workshop July 21, 1999.
A 28-1ot tract map on Via La Vida east of Calle Palmas, Tentative Tract Map 29036. Staff
is still waiting for a re-submittal addressing the comments raised the DRC meeting. The
applicant has been modifying the project from 29 to 24 lots. A Development Agreement
may be submitted for the project.
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: The Draft EIR was being
circulated for public review and comment. A Planning Commission Workshop was held on
June 30, 1999. Tentative Planning Commission date is August, 1999.
,,
Pacific Gulf Properties - A development of a 244 unit senior apartment complex with two
and three story building on an 8.13 acre lot including a Planned Development Overlay
(PDO). Located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. Planning
Commission had concerns with the proposed zoning. The Planning Commission approved
the project on June 2, 1999. It was appealed to the City Council and will be scheduled for
the Council in July, 1999.
Winston Tires - Conditional Use Permit to design, construct and operate a 5,310 square
foot tire sales and installation, automotive service and repair facility. Located at 40385
Winchester Road, within the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center at the northeast corner
of Margarita Road and Winchester Road. The Planning Commission date to be set for July,
1999.
Clayton Hill, DVM - Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the development of a
veterinarian hospital on a .69 acre lot. Located on the south side of Winchester Road, west
of Nicolas Road. Plans were resubmitted the week of June 7, 1999.
R:\MONTHLY.RP'R1999\June 99.doc
2
GMC Building - Development Plan for new 19,000 square feet light industrial spec building
on the north side of Rio Nedo, between Via Industria and Tierra Alta Way. Staff is awaiting
re-submittal.
The following Mall Out-Lot developments are being reviewed:
- Burger King, 3,800 square feet.
- Souplantation restaurant, 7, 100 square feet.
- On the Border restaurant, 7,000 square feet.
Don Mosco - A 22,200 square foot speculative office and warehouse building located on
Colt Court and Winchester Road (Tract Map No. 28471-1 ). Tentative Planning Commission
date in August, 1999.
Don Mosco - A 13,800 square foot speculative office and warehouse b~jilding located on
the west side of Colt Court adjacent to Bostik (Tract Map No. 28471-1 Lot 5). Awaiting
resubmittal.
Edwards Theater - Specific Plan Amendment, allowing the theater to erect a freestanding
marquee sign (26 feet in height). The sign is proposed at the easternmost entrance from
Winchester Road to the Temecula Promenade Mall. Scheduled for City Council on July 13,
1999.
Mequita and Associates design and construction of a concrete tilt-up speculative building
to develop as condos. Located on Madison Avenue (Parcel Map 23561-1 ). Approved by
Planning Commission on June 16, 1999.
Temecula Quick Lube - Redesign, construct and operate a 3,491 square foot lube and oil
shop within the existing Moraga Plaza shopping center. Staff approval pending.
Tim Shook Company Commercial Buildings - Design and construction of two 6,000 square
feet commercial speculative buildings located at 27525 Enterprise Circle South. Tentative
Planning Commission date in August, 1999.
Tentative Parcel Map 29162 - Subdivide 48 acres into eight industrial parcels and one open
space lot located at Winchester Road and Dendy Parkway. Development Review
Committee meeting was held June 10, 1999. Awaiting revised traffic study and resubmittal.
Small Business Assistance
.,
Denny's Restaurant: Staff worked with architect and contractor to resolve problems with
a proposed remodel and new signs for this business.
Main Street Salon: Helped the owners of this new business select locations and obtain
approvals for signs from the Old Town Local Review Board.
Rhythm and Brews: Advised applicant for proposed brew pub in Old ToWn. Staff made
site visits, expedited his pre application review and called ABC regarding the impact of
adjacent uses on the ultimate approval of this project.
R:\MONTHLY.RP'R1999\June 99.doc
Destination Temecula: Evaluated proposal and made a site visit for a nE~w sign with the
owner in preparation for review by the Old Town Local Review Board.
Special Event Permits
Open Wheel Racing Events - Stock Car Option (Northwest Sports Park)
The Great Race - City of Temecula (Old Town)
HOG Rally - Preliminary Information Package for October Event (Old Town)
SPECIAL PROJECTS & LONG RANGE PLANNING ACTIVITIES
The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both
private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or
environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major
special projects and long range planning activities are as follows:
Housing Element Update: The City has received a draft of the City's Regional Housing Need
Assessment obligations. Staff is currently reviewing the proposed housing unit (by income
group) targets and will be evaluating SCAG's methodology and assumptions. Staff held the
initial data sharing meeting with the consulting firm of Cotton/Beland/Associates on June
30, 1999. Housing and land use related materials were distributed and discussed with the
consultant. The next task is for the consultant to quantify the data and report back to staff
with preliminary results of where the City stands in relation to the programs contained within
the existing Housing Element.
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: The consultant
is currently gathering information to begin preparation of the Draft EIR. Staff is currently
reviewing the consultant's initial submittals.
Southside Specific Plan: Staff is reviewing the draft Specific Plan and land use standards
provided by the consultant.
Massage Business Ordinance: A revised draft of the ordinance was reviewed by the City
Attorney and presented at the May 3, 1999 meeting of the local massage practitioners.
Staff is currently revising the draft Ordinance based upon their input.
General Plan Circulation Element Update: The consultant has submitted a draft of the Mall
Opening Traffic Analysis that is being reviewed by City staff. The Circulation Element
Analysis is expected soon. Staff plans to complete the Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report internally to keep the project on schedule. The comment period for the Notice of
Intent to prepare a Supplemental EIR closed on June 27, 1999. Comments were received
from the Western Riverside Council of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
Subdivision Ordinance: The draft Ordinance was considered by the Planning Commission
at their July 7, 1999 meeting. With some minor changes, the Commission recommended
the City Council approve the Ordinance.
R:\MONTHLY.RP'R1999\June 99.doc
4
Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to
scheduling this item for the Planning Commission's consideration.
RedhawI,JVail Ranch Annexation Study: The preliminary efforts have all been completed.
No additional work is expected on this project is expected until after the election.
Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney are making final changes based
upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their
consideration
Geographic Information System (GIS): Staff has completed a revised Quino Checkerspot
Butterfly/California Gnatcatcher study and habitat map. The habitat map is being reviewed
by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for final approval. Staff has also started developing an
industrial land availability map to assist the City's Economic Development Program. A map
of residential land availability was recently prepared in support of the Housing Element up
date. The map will be instrumental in locating potential building sites for affordable housing.
A GIS work program is being developed to guide the City in starting-up this new activity.
Sign Ordinance Handbooks: City staff has recently completed the ~reparation of a
handbook for Office and Industrial Signage. The Commercial Sign Handbook has been
completed and is in use.
Antenna Ordinance: Because of recent federal law changes, the City Attorney is
recommending major changes to the draft Ordinance. As a result, the draft Ordinance is
being re-written.
Coordination with the Bureau of Census. Staff continues to work with the Bureau to ensure
an accurate and complete count for the 2000 census. Final map and address changes
have been submitted to the Bureau.
Application Fee Study: Staff has submitted the necessary information to the City's
consultant and is awaiting the preliminary results.
Hillside Development Policy: Staff has prepared the policies for review by other City
departments.
Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County: Staff is
attending committee meetings and monitoring the process of determining conservation
reserve needs and will report back to the Council when a draft plan is available.
Development Code Amendment: Staff is preparing an amendment to the Code to address
large family day care facilities and to further refine how the City reviews and approves
Temporary Use Permits.
R:\MONTHLY.RP'R1999\June 99.doc
· lueld '1~ 'bs 000'g ~ sl! le gZ o10g sXoldLua/qluaJJns XueduJoo
eql 's~ls!p Oep!A lel!6!p Jo uo!leJeua6 MeU e Jo sJeonpojd 6u!peel S,pIJOM eql 6uowe
s! leql LUJB epualeA plo JeaA:-17 e s! e!PelAI os!a leo!ldO 'uo!leooleJ le!luelod s,/~uedLuoo
aN1 ssnos!p ol pJ~: aunt uo e!pal/%l os!a leo!ldO to uosueH o!j:l ql!M laLU XpeJg,O LU!r
· sujej6ojd pue speel 'senss! 6u!uueld/6u!le~tjeLu ssnos!p
ol q~6~ eunr pue ls~ eunr uo oa9 ~luno3 ep!SJeA!~ lseMqinoS eql ql!M leLU ~elS
'sesseu!snq
e6Jel ol wn!pew jo Xl!l!qel!JoJd pue Xwouooe eql eAoJdw! ol ~JOA~eN O!WOUO03 eBelloO
AI!UnLULUOO e!uJoJ!leO eql Xq pepunj ueeq seq uo!lez!ue6jo s!q/'ep!AoJd Xeql gLueJ6oJd
eouels!sse sseu!snq eql uo UO!leLUJOJU! pejeqs 'eouelleox9 sseu!sn8 Joj Jelue3
ql!M 'o[!tuJV oue!Jd!3 'oslV 'sesseu!snq elels-Jo-lno Meu oM1 pel!s Xeql Moq pejeqs
'eeje olu!oep ueSRetueH jo uogeJodJo3 luetudoleAea 3!uJouoo9 ~elleA eql 'p.~
aunt uo ed!eonA u! ~nJo4 ~3ua~v eoje~o3 ~ ape J/pUB aqlVO eql papuelle ~elS
· weJ6ojd s!41 lueLualdw!
ol peJedejd 6u!eq s! le6pnq pue wej6ojd V 'sesseu!snq elnoewe/JoJ uo!lepeJdde
s1! MOqS pue ez!u6ooej plnoM/4!O eql Moq uo pessnos!p ejeM seep! snopeA 'LueJ6oJd
uo!l!u6ooe~ sseu!sn8 eql ssnos!p Jeqpnj ol L eunr uo ~o!uloM e!JolO pue XPeJO,O
Lu!r 'seleA lueJO 'z~nN Ho!O 'SLue!II!M ~pue~ ql!M pleq seM 6u!lee~ qoun3 uo!luele~
sseu!sn8 V 'leq1 jo qo! poo6 e 6u!op s! ee~!LULUOO uo!luele~ sseu!sn8 s,O03 eq/
'Xl!UnLULUOO Jno u! sesseu!snq 6u!ls!xe eql Jo 6u!puelsJepun ue pue ql!M d!qsuo!leleJ
e qs!lqelse ol s! LueJ6oJd lueLudoleAep O!LUOUOOe 6UOJlS e 6u!pl!nq u! dels Xe~ V
sSu!lee~
luetudoleAea 3!LUOUO3~I
'666 I, eunp Jo 41uow e41
Joj luewpedea luewdoleAea o!wouooq eql Joj s146!146!4 lueoeJ e41 eje 6u!MolloJ e4/
~ode~ leluew~edea Xlqluo~ luewdoleAea O!LUOUO03 :~OgranS
r_r'~euelAI
666 I, 'Z;~/qnr :9,LVa
/~1!0 luels!ssV 'XPeJg,0 LU!p :lNO1d_-I
IpunoO A1!O/Je6euelAJ Xl!O :0/
/~Odg~ VQN99V
VqR33~9~ 40 A~I3
EI:!DVNVIAI ),119
8019381G 3:::)NVNIJ
~x2ZA:INEIOllV All3
~ 'lVAOSddV
Staff met with representatives of an automobile parts manufacturing firm on June
11th regarding a potential business relocation.
A meeting with representatives of the San Diego Padres was held on June 21 to
discuss marketing in Temecula and construction of a Little Padres sports field.
On June 25th, staff attended a Temecula Connect meeting which featured the firm
"Education to Go", a new Temecula company that provides college level extension
courses via the internet.
On June 28th, Jim O'Grady met with CoStar and representatives of the EDC as part of
the EDC Business Visitation program.
Staff attended the State of the Southwest Riverside County Address, which was held
on June 4th at the Lake Elsinore Stadium.
Allie Kuhns presented the "State of the City Address" to the Manufacturers' Council
on June 9th during their regular meeting. This presentation was based on the Mayor's
State of the City powerpoint address in March. The cities of Murrieta and Lake Elsinore
also gave presentations.
Jim O'Grady and Grant Yates attended the EDC Business Retention Committee
Meeting on June 3rd. The City provided the committee with brochures produced by the
Center for Business Excellence highlighting their business assistance programs.
Jim O'Grady and Gloria Wolnick attended the IEEP Membership Luncheon at the
Mission Inn on June 30th. The topics included an overall presentation of the Kosmont
Study. In addition, Trade & Commerce made a presentation on their new marketing
campaign called The California Experience. This campaign includes an IMAX film on
California and a traveling California lifestyle exhibit. The 5,000 sq. ft. exhibit will feature
the food, fashion, art, sports, music, sites and technological innovations of California and
California companies.
On June 10th, staff attended Four Slide Engineering's Groundbreaking Ceremony of
its new facility located at 42585 Rio Nedo. The company specializes in the manufacture
of metal stampings, wire forms, and coiled springs. In their program, Four Slide
expressed their thanks to the City of Temecula and it's various departments for their
professional assistance through the planning and development process in building their
new facility.
Outreach Materials
Staff is developing a "User Guide for City Services", which acquaints residents and
businesses -- particularly new ones -- with the services offered by Temecula city
government. It also provides the most frequently used phone numbers for City services,
utilities, schools, emergency services, and other government offices. A comprehensive
listing and location map of Temecula parks and recreational facilities are located on the
back cover. This listing is designed to inform residents of the wealth of recreational
amenities available in the community.
2
Staff updated the City's "Fast Track" pamphlet, which is included in our business kits
and also given out by the EDC and Chamber. The pamphlet is scheduled for printing in
mid-July.
Media
As a member of IEEP, Temecula was included in the May 31, 1999 issue of Forbes
Magazine which highlighted the Inland Empire. Temecula did not participate financially
in the magazine but was still represented in the special advertising section titled: "The
Inland Empire: Getting Down To Business". Temecula businesses Chemicon and
Guidant were included. As of June 28th there were 2,076 inquiries. Of those inquiries,
705 came directly to IEEP. Inquiries will be forwarded to appropriate cities and IEEP will
also follow up with customized packets.
Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce Newsletter announcing the new
"Temecula User Guide To City Services" pamphlet.
Leads & Inquiries
In the month of June, the City responded to 6 leads and 11 inquiries.
Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building can
now be found in the Community Development Department report.
Some of the leads include:
Staff responded to a request for information on a biotech company represented by Mr.
Paul Leibowitz of CB Richard Ellis.
Staff sent information on demographics and tax information to Tim Chase. Mr. Chase
represents a business that is looking to relocate. The business is looking to employ
250 - 400 employees.
Staff provided information to Mohammad R. Kahn and directed him to Forest City's
leasing agents, as he is interested in opening up a retail store in the Promenade Mall.
He currently has a store in the Whittier Mall.
On June 15, staff met with research analyst Eric Petrotte. Staff provided him with
detailed demographic information of Temecula and neighboring communities as well as
other information on businesses, housing developments, retail development, etc. as part
of a market study for one of Mr. Petrotte's clients.
Tourism
Staff provided Sandy Cain, writer for Orange County Business Journal, with
information on Temecula including hotel accommodations, meeting space and other
general information to include in her article titled "Meetings in the West".
Bob Carter, a freelance travel writer assigned to RV Journal publication, contacted the
City for information on Temecula's holiday events. Staff is preparing information to send
to him. RV Journal has a 125,000 circulation and is a quarterly publication.
3
The Economic Development Agency of Riverside County produced its first
countywide golf brochure to promote the golf courses throughout Riverside County to
visitors and residents. The EDA printed 75,000 brochures and distribution will include:
Chambers of Commerce, City Halls, Trade Shows, etc. The EDA will also launch a radio
advertising campaign in June featuring a golf course in our area. Temecula will include
the golf brochure in our tourism press kits and business kits.
Tanya Ellis of PRA Destination Management Company in Encinitas requested
Temecula tourism rack brochures in bulk to market our area to their groups that they
make arrangements for. Staff provided them with the brochures and put PRA in touch
with Linda Kissam for Vintner brochures.
Staff coordinated with the Chamber and TTA on The Great Race event, which was held
on June 19, 1999. Staff attended meetings that were held on June 9th and 16th.
Media
Staff provided Ms. Bari Brenner, travel editor of ANG newspapers, with Temecula
and Vintner press kits and slides. Staff put Ms. Brenner in contact with the wineries,
Embassy Suites and Temecula Creek Inn. The article included the Temecula wineries,
Old Town and lodging. The newspaper is distributed in the Bay area. (See attached).
Great Race invitations, posters and meal tickets were sent out to all local media as
well as selected out-of-area media. PSA announcements were sent to local radio
stations and press releases were sent out to the media.
Community
As part of the People to People Student Ambassador Program, a national program
started by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, two sixth-graders from Temecula will be
traveling to Australia to learn about the culture, and to share our culture with others. The
program was rounded as a way of promoting understanding of cultural differences
throughout the world.
Lindsey Svete and Tiffany Cota, both of Temecula, were chosen along with 11 other
sixth-graders from throughout Riverside and San Bernardino Counties to travel with the
program.
The students will be meeting with Australian students their own ages and sharing
information about their community. They will have the opportunity to talk about wine
country, the Balloon & Wine Festival and all the other things that make Temecula a
unique and great place to live.
Staff provided the girls with literature and souvenirs to distribute as well as City of
Temecula tee shirts.
Attachments:
EDC of Southwest Riverside County Activity Report
Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activity Report
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activity Report
Temecula Valley Film Council Activity Report
ANG Newspaper Article
4
July 16, 1999
Economic
DeVelopment
Corporation
,gouthu 'est Riverside Omnty
Jim O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
RE: Activity Summary
The following highlights the activities of the EDC during the month of June:
Business Development
The EDC responded to three requests for information from IEEP. One request
required an 80,000 sf facility for an Oklahoma City based manufacturer.
Information was sent for a request for 50,000 sf for a fulfillment warehouse and a
request for 150,000 sf for a company manufacturing specialty plastic bags for the
food industry. Responses could not be sent for a food processor whose rail
service was critical, for a concrete fabricator who needed quarry access and
heavy industrial zoning and for a Midwestern wood products firm who also
required rail access. A request for an 800,000 sf distribution facility looking in the
states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and So. California was not responded to,
as they required a location within a 50-mile radius of Los Angeles. Similarly, a
request for a 250,000 to 300,000 existing building with a move - in date of
January 2000 could not be responded to for lack of inventory in the region. Met
with the Business Manager for an agricultural products sales organization looking
to relocate from the Fresno area. Provided information for a local CPA to give to
a client desirous of starting a manufacturing company in the region. Gave
demographic, commuter study and State of California incentive guide to local
area broker.
Marketin.q Outreach
Quarterly luncheon held at the Diamond Stadium in Lake Elsinore focused on the
State of Southwestern Riverside County. First District Supervisor Bob Buster
gave keynote address. Approximately 100 golfers attended the fund-raising golf
tournament produced by EDC-SWRC on June 15, 1999. The tournament netted
over ten thousand dollars for the organization. Chairman Gary Youmans of
Fallbrook National Bank said that planning for an even bigger tournament next
year has begun. EDC President Bonnie Hanna and Executive Director Judi
Staats gave a presentation about the programs of the EDC to the attendees of
the groundbreaking ceremony for Four Slide Engineering, a City of Riverside firm
moving to Temecula.
Post Office Box 1388 · Tcmccula, CA 92593-1388 · Oflicc 909/695-5130 · FAX 909/695-5126
Jim O'Grady
July 16, 1999
Page Two
Business Relations
The Business Relations Committee reported on four visitations made to
company's during the month. Plant tours were conducted with International
Rectifier and Costar. Information was given to IR for educational linkages and
emergency contacts. Costar was given a contact name for the Promenade Mall
Judi Staats reported that the survey instrument for the Workforce Development
Grant had been mailed to approximately 700 businesses in selected sic code
designations during the month of June. The contract provider is receiving
completed surveys and follow up telephone calls will begin in early July. The
Southwest Riverside County Workforce Grant Committee will try to meet in July
to begin the process of sending out RFP's to develop the Resource Guide, the
second component to the grant obligation. Monthly updates will continue to be
provided.
Administration/Omanization
Two Board of Director meetings were held in June to re-prioritize the
Implementation Plan developed for Southwest Riverside County by Steve
Harding. Due to a reduction in municipal funding for the organization, adoption of
the plan as originally presented was not deemed to be feasible for the 1999-2000
fiscal year. A draft operational budget taking into account the reduction of
funding was presented and approved by the Board of Directors at the June 30,
1999 Board of Directors meeting. Alternatives were discussed at the meeting to
reduce the rental expenditure currently paid by the organization. A revised
workplan for fiscal year 1999-2000 will be presented to the Board of Directors at
the July meeting.
This concludes the written summary of activity for the month of June. Please call
if there are questions concerning this report.
JMonday Jury 12, 1999 10:50am -- From '909 690 1088'
JUL-12-g9 It0N 11:04 Rli iEEP
-- Page
FAX N0. 909 890 1088
I~ILAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARqFNERSHIP
02
For Period: J. anu.arv. 1999 to June, 1999
Item [ June
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PAR~'NER~HIP
~. Public Speaking Engageme. nt~
· 2. Communi[y Outreach
3. Economic Development:
· Direct Mail
· Advertising
· Local Retentio~
· TeamCA Ads
· Magazines
. Directories
· Journals
· 'Ou~f~r Ms
· Radio
· Articles
o' 'TOTAL
· Tradeshews
· Press Releases
· Media Relat/c~s
· Prospect Missions
· Site Selector Outreach
· Leads
· Source of'Leads
· Inquiries
· Attraddons
· Jobs Created
· Retent}on
· Jobs Retained
· Financial Investment**
· Tours
Corporate:
· Member Visits/Calls
· Meml:~rship Events
· special Events
· New Membe~ Prospecls/
Interest Letters
~ Cumulative
I 22
26 76
I Comments
I 3
1
2
4
211
1
150
$9.000,000
9
9
8
15
4
'6
1
2
3
40
4
15
15
2
12
38
382
837
2:i5
$57,738,256
Billboards on 5/605 freeway
KABC, I<FWB
(4) BrOker, ('15) eovL; (10) Sit~
Selector;, (1) Client Referral;
(3) IEEP; (4) Ad Response; (1)
Website
Sears, D~sney, American Tire
Disposal, Hillon, Quality Cabinets,
Poly Pacific, Toybox Creations,
ConAgra, InterMetro, Old Dominion
Freight Line
Lynam Industries, InterMetro
3 ~ Kickstart Film School, Wadley
Donovan
74
2
1
25 78
· New Members
· . Corp.or. ate AdvertRing
Corp;_Mktg:lPress Release
· Other Projects
3
' 6 CATCA, GE Capital, Univ. of Phoenix,
Yucca Valley. ESRI, Raincross Med.
2 ' Business Press
3 Annual Report Distributed
6 Marketing award entry - CALED,
March contract solidified, SoCal Reg.
Planning Cntr., Legislative Mission
IMonday July 12, 1999 lO:50am -- From '909 890 1088' -- Page :~
JUL-12-99 IION 11:05 Rli EEP
FAX N0. 909 890 ]088
P. 03
WORKFORCE COLLABOi~ATIVE
' 1. i3areer Club Clienls
2. School Enrichment Standard $32,800
'"iNLAND EMPIREFILM COMMISSlO~I
1....!.ndustry Outreach 4
2. Filming, broken down as follows
(these numbers reflect known I-E
filming activity):
· Features 2
· TV 2
. Commercials 20
o Stills 37
. M~sic Viaeos 3
· Student F~ims 1
* DocumenL/Indus. Videos 4
TOTAL* 69
3. Request for Locarjons 168
4. Filming Credits
5. Permits 14
6. Econ_omic Impact $654.250
FOUNDATION
· Activities
SBDC
:Jobs Created/Jobs Retained 0/7'
Economi~ Impact $5,886.500
1. Client .Activity 109
· Client Hours 472
2. Training Events 8
.· Training Hours 527
· 'j'raining Event Attendees t08
3. Outreach Update/Public
Speaking
4. I.E. International Trade
· Export Actions
· Dollars $
15. Othe~'
TOURISM COUNCIL
1. Industry Outreach 2
2. 'U arke~ing Activity
· Tradeshows
Promotional Materials
3. ~aiJings (cd-rom)
4. Ads
HIGH TECH
1 .'Clients/Inquiries
2. Client Hours
'73. Trai~ing Events "
4. Financial Ecoriomic Impact
5. Other Projects
5
3.5
~0
$39,500.00
5 Locations Tradeshow
15'
7
99
159
12
12
39
343'
842
81
$9;~6,850
2
89/58
$18,291,000
795
2,768
63
4,178
788
10
$1,08~,00D
1
*Preliminary humbers
Partial Amount/Preliminary Numbers
TdComm Pictures, Golf Tournament
8BA Awards LuncheOn
43 Sacramento Tourism Conference.
Nike Golf
2 Sun Adventure Guide, Trout Derby
5 Sacto Con[ on Tourism. CTM, LA
Times Show
3 Adventure Guide. Destination Video,
website on-line
5 CD-Rom. Calendar of Events, Tour
Operator mailing: 1,000 Sunset Ad
responses
3 ' 1/4 page ad Sunset Mag, LA Times
10
20.5
2
$100;000
9
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201
July 12, 1999
Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Shawn:
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula.
This is the month of June at a glance:
Business Inquiry Highlights
9 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula.
They received a business packet which includes information on demographics, relocatiort, housing,
rentals, maps, organizations, etc.
Committee Highlights
Tourism Committee: The City has been selected as a winner of the distinguished Great American
CiW Award by the History Channel Great Race held on June 19. The title honors the best lunch stop
on the 3,800~mile, 44-City transcontinental route. History Channel representatives remm to the City to
present the award and a $5,000 donation to the Friends of the Temecula Library. Chamber staff
contacted over 50 businesses in the community and secured the sponsors for the event. The staff
obtained the printing of sponsors' logos on 3,000 Great Race posters, donated by Maufiee Printers.
Members of the Tourism Committee did a wonderful job assisting with this event!
Melody Brunsting spoke to the Tourism Committee on the future of a Visitor and Convention Center
in Temecula. Staff is currently gathering data on operations for a Visitors and Convention Bureau.
Education Committee: Stories written by Temecula students will be judged shortly. A winning
story will be selected and read by a stoW telling bear in the play area of the Promenade Mall. As part
of the job mentoring program, video taping of business leaders will be filmed by Chaparral High
School's video production class for distribution to the high schools' career programs.
Ways & Means Committee: Committee members for Monte Carlo, Business Showcase and
Temecula Valley Pageant are currently meeting in order to prepare for these upcoming events. Monte
Carlo will be held August 18, at Embassy Suites Hotel. Autumn Fest '99 Business Showcase is slated
for October 20, at Temeku Hills Auditorium.
Temecula Valley Pageant has forty-one contestants seeking the title for Wee, Little Miss, Jr. Miss,
Teen, Miss and Mrs. Temecula. The Temecula Valley Pageant will take place August 28, at
Temecula Middle School.
Local Business Promotions Committee: Success Seminar Series "Unleash Your Marketing Power!"
scheduled for June 8, 1999, at Embassy Suites Hotel, was a successful breakfast seminar. Discussion
was held to continue with Success Seminar Series twice a year, during January and June.
"Shop Temecula First .... because it just makes Sense" June campaign commenced on June 1, with
eighty-two participants. The Press-Enterprise is the June campaign sponsor.
Weekly customer and merchant winners were rewarded with many donated git~s and certificates
from local businesses. The Grand Prize merchant winner was drawn on June 30, Treasures of
Mexico is the $500 grand prize winner. The Grand Prize customer winner Robert Martinez, will
receive $1,000 cash, courtesy of our sponsor, The Press-Enterprise. The Press-Enterprise will
provide photo coverage of both the Grand Prize Customer and Business. The Shop Temecula First
Committee participated in the 4th of July parade along with mascot Hamlet from Lake Elsinore Storm
and our very own Mystery Shopper.
Government Action Committee: Guest speaker, Dennis Hollingsworth of the Farm Bureau and
candidate for the State Assembly, gave an informative presentation on the Endangered Species Act
Plan. The Chamber is taking a stance in opposing SB402 (Burton-Villaraigosa) which mandates
binding arbitration for police and firefighters. The Chamber is also opposing SB1237 (Escutia) which
allows third party lawsuits against insurers. Monthly "Legislative Alerts" containing bills impacting
the business community will be broadcast faxed to Chamber members. Chamber members may write
to their legislators in support or opposition of the bills.
Membership Committee: Ambassadors attended 13 Ribbon Cuttings in June. They held a very
successful Mixer in June at North County Bank. Over 250 business members artended. The
Ambassador Networking Breakfast had 72 business members in attendance. The committee is
focusing on the special topic breakfast on July 28 at the Embassy Suites Hotel from 7:30 a.m.-9:00
a.m. The topic is "The Mall...What it means to you!" Featured speakers are Shawn Nelson/Acting
City Manager, Jim O 'Grady/Assistant City Manager, Gall Enderwood/Director of Leasing of the
Promenade Mall and Jeff Stone, Facilitator. The breakfast is flee and the Chamber encourages
members and the public to aHend. The Committee is hosting a Chamber Open House (formerly New
Member Reception) on Tuesday, July 13 at the Chamber. The Chamber Open House will be informing
the last quarter new members and potential new members on the benefits of being a member of the
TVCC business organization. The Chamber Open House is offered on quarterly basis.
Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
· 225 Visitor Guides to the City of Temecula for distribution to prospective visitors and businesses
coming to Temecula.
· 425 Visitor Guides, 350 Old Town Walking Tour Maps, 50 Temecula Brochures and 250 Winery
Brochures to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center.
· 225 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to One Song for distribution to tourists.
· 200 Temecula Brochures to Indian Dental Association attending a conference at the Lawrence Welk
Resort Center.
· 100 Old Town Maps to Captains Cabin for a promotional mailing.
· 100 Visitor Guides to Pala Mesa Resort for distribution to guests.
· 100 One-page Street Maps, 100 Temecula Brochures and 100 Relocation Packets to International
Rectifier for distribution to new employees.
50 Education Brochures, 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Paseo Del Sol for distribution
to clients.
· 40 Old Town Maps, 40 Visitor Guides and 40 Winery Brochures to the City of Moreno Valley for a
tour in Temecula.
· 30 Education Brochures and 30 Temecula Brochures to Coldwell Banker Assoc. for distribution to
prospective home buyers.
Activity Report
· Overall Tourism phone calls are up 19.16 percent from last year.
· Overall phone calls are up 14.12 percent from last year.
· Walk-ins are up 15.60 percent from last year.
E-Mail requests: 93
Also attached are the Meeting Minutes for the Tourism, Education, Ways & Means, Local Business
Promotions, Government Action, Membership Committees and "How did you hear about Temecula?"
report. If you have any question regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Thank you.
Sincerely,
President/CEO
cc:
Mayor Steven J. Ford
Mayor Pro Tem Jeffcry E. Stone
CounciLman Jeff Comerchero
Councilman Karel F. Lindemans
CounciLman Ronald H. Roberts
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
Gloria Wolnick, Markcling Coordinator
TVCC Board or' Directors
PHONE CALLS TOURISM
TOURISM REFERRALS
Calendar of Events
Special Events
General Information
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PHONE CALLS
CHAMBER REFERRALS
WALK-INS TOURISM
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
SPECIAL EVENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL WALK-INS
MAILINGS
TOURISM
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
TOTAL MAILINGS
E-MAIL
TOURISM
RELOCATION
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL E-MAIL
GRAND TOTALS
PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS
MAILINGS
E-MAIL
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
FOR JUNE, 1999
Chamber Vis. Center
This Month This Month
Total
Year-To-Date
350
117
376
998
1,841
2684
683
4241
6,351
13,959
182
93
1,646
109
3,871
13,615
1292
398
10,622
744
13,056
71,395
145
89
113
707
167
65
816
40
2,142
148
1
35
182
4
0
7
1
378
1,900
684
549
4,779
1058
348
5,428
353
15,099
139
101
98
338
1070
632
666
2,368
24
17
52
93
THIS MONTH
3,871
2,142
338
93
116
109
329
554
YEAR-TO-DATE
63,523
10,925
1,939
648
ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS
Chamber
June, 1998
Chamber
June, 1999
Percentage
Increase
WALK-INS
TOURISM 103 145 40.78
CALENDAR OF EVENTS 82 89 8.54
SPECIAL EVENTS 125 113 -9.60
GENERAL INFORMATION 467 707 51.39
RELOCATION 130 167 28.46
DEMOGRAPHICS 59 65 10.17
CHAMBER 963 816 -15.26
MISCELLANEOUS 65 40 -38.46
VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 186 378 103.23
TOTAL WALK-INS 2,180 2,520 15.60
MAILINGS
TOURISM 167 139 -16.77
RELOCATION 115 101 -12.17
DEMOGRAPHICS 84 98 16.67
TOTAL MAILINGS 366 338 -7.65
E-MAIL
TOURISM N/A 24 N/A
RELOCATION N/A 17 N/A
MISCELLANEOUS N/A 52 N/A
TOTAL E-MAIL 93 N/A
* Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
Tourism Referrals 392 350 -10.71
Calendar of Events 64 117 82.81
Special Events 214 376 75.70
General Information 875 998 14.06
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,545 1,841 19.16
RELOCATION 151 182 20.53
DEMOGRAPHICS 50 93 86.00
CHAMBER 1,548 1,646 6.33
MISCELLANEOUS 98 109 11.22
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 3,392 3,871 14.12
CHAMBER REFERRALS 5,642 13,615 141.32
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
ACTIVITIES REPORT
June 1999
Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny
Thomas, Vice-President; Judi Staats, Treasurer; Steve Phelps, Secretary; Brian Padberg,
Sheri Davis, and Penny Rivera.
The Business of the Film Council
Temecula Talent Showcase '99 was a great success. Close to 600 tickets were sold
for what appeared to be a FULL HOUSE. As this was a fundraiser for the TVFC, we
are please to have raised over $600, after awarding $2400 in prizes to the contestants.
Film Council and Film Festival have been combined to one telephone location by call
forwarding. Maggi Allen worked with the Film Festival staff and directed all calls to
the proper channels. We have received eight specific location calls this month and
hundreds of festival related inquiries.
The Temecula Valley was represented at ShowBiz Expo at the L. A. Convention
Center on the weekend of June 26 - 27 in the IEFC booth with location photographs
and our production postcards.
Filming activity
Local barns with wood siding were used as backup production settings for a film in
process. This allowed the filmmaker to avoid the extra expense of returning to the
films original location in Iowa. Sheri Davis of the IEFC was able to help us as this
request came in the middle of the Festival.
Cinema Entertainment Alliance produced a very successful Film Festival.
Attendance was increased over last year's Festival. Over 100 Temecula and area
residents actively participated as volunteers to make the event run smoothly. Over
100 films were shown over a seven-day schedule in seven theaters at the Temeku
Cinemas. Filmmakers and film production people from all over the world attended
the Festival and represented their films.
The Film Council distributed over 100 "Welcome" packets to the filmmakers. Each
packet included the NEW Chamber of Commerce map of Temecula and tourism
brochures and the Film Council's Production Guide of local businesses and services.
A Poker Run Hot Rod rally was arranged for the filmmakers on June 19th following
the Great Race stop. 40 filmmakers were driven through Temecula for a fun
afternoon and were shown some of our excellent photo location spots at the same
time. Maps were distributed so that if they saw a location they liked, they would
know how to find it again. The Australian team was awarded a basket full of
Temecula related items (thank you to Gloria Wolnick for her contributions) for
having collected the best Poker Hand during the rally.
On Sunday, June 20th 15 filmmakers were taken for Hot Air Balloon experiences over
the vineyards. Many of the filmmakers indicated that they would like to return to this
area.
Permitting and local information were requested by Katie Bell Productions from
England. They will be filming an interview here in early July.
Thank you for approving $20,000 in funding for the Film Council. We are looking
forward to meeting with the Economic Development Sub-committee on July 22nd for
further discussion.
We will continue to support the daily management of ~lmmaker's requests, and
encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to
generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking
activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local
merchants and businesses
Respectfully,
Maggi Allen
President, TVFC
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 27, 1999
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public
Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of June, 1999.
MOACTRPT
I-
I-
w
.J
u.I
LU U,I
~o z ~ H 0
~ Z u') rY'
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
June 1999
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: July 27, 1999
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
The Rancho California Road loop ramp project improvement is now complete. The landscape maintenance
period has begun and the contractor is correcting punch list items. The City submitted plans and specifications
for additional ramp improvements to Caltrans for review. The additional work proposed is as follows: Widen
both the southbound and northbound on-ramps to two lanes, widen the north side of Rancho California Road
from Ynez Road to the northbound on-ramp to provide an additional lane and optional westbound right turn lane,
and modify the existing median island just east of Front Street to extend the existing left-turn pocket. The City
will be going out to public bid for this ncxv work.
2. Temecula Duck Pond Park:
The park improvements are substantially complete with only the punch list items remaining. This project is now
in the 90-days maintenance period. Project completion is anticipated in the middle of September. Park
improvements include a gazcbo/bandstand, picnic hcilitics, a restroom, walkways, parking lot, security lighting,
and landscaping and irrigation in~provcments. The street improvements consist of the widening of Ynez Road
to full width, between Rancho California Road and Tierra Vista Road. Those improvements include new
sidewalks; additional turn lanes, traffic signal modifications at Yncz Road and Rancho Califomia Road, a new
traffic signal at Ynez Road and Ticrra Vista Road. and pavement restriping to improve traffic circulation.
3. Margarita Road Sidewalk (Rancho Vista to Pauba Road):
Construction of the curb, gutter and sidewalk, and paving Margarita Road are now complete. This project is now
in the 90-day maintenance period. The improvcn~ents included the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and
sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The sidewalk will
improve access to the Rancho California Sports Park. Also. as part of the design, additive alternate
improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfields along with an
expanded parking area.
Completion is scheduled for Septcmbcr 1999.
4. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening:
Thc contractor has installed the concrctc curb, gutter, sidexvalks and base paving along Winchester Road and
Ynez Road. The electrical sub-contractor is modif,ving existing signals and installing new signals on both
Winchester and Ynez Roads. The landscaping sub-contractor has began installing water mainline and
underground electrical for the proposed landscape improvements.
Construction is scheduled to be completed in August 1999.
R:\MonthlyAclivityReport\C1P\99\JuneRevised.doc
5. Overland Drive Street Improvements & Margarita Road Street Widening:
The contractor has constructed Phase 1I of the box culvert at Overland Drive and is grading the Long Canyon
Creek channel, and detention basin. The electrical sub-contractor is continuing to place street light and traffic
signal improvements. The placement of curb, gutter, and sidewalk is occurring on the eastside of Margarita Road.
Construction is scheduled to be completed in August 1999.
6. Winchester Road Median Islands and Enterprise Circle Traffic Signal:
The project included the installation of a median island, landscaping and irrigation along Winchester Road from
Jefferson Avenue to 900 feet west. The new median island at Jefferson Avenue was constructed to provide for
a louger left turn pocket for northbound traffic.
Construction is now substantially complete and is in the 90-dav maintenance period, which should end on August
13, 1999.
7. 1-15/Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement:
Construction of the bridge supports (columns & abutments) is complete. Erection of temporary falsework is also
complete. The in'st of three stages of jefferson Avenue modifications continued xvith the completion of the sewer
line and storm drain improvements. The contractor has begun working 10-hour days to accelerate the
construction of the bridge
Estimated bridge opening is October 1999.
8. Pala Road Bridge:
The bridge improvements continued x~4th the completion of both bridge abutments. The pier wall was completed.
Stage 1 construction of the grouted rock slope protection (Rip-Rap) for the channel is continuing. Installation of
the underground utility work and the bridge falsework is under~vay.
Estimated completion date for Stage I of the project is December 1999.
9. Tennis Court Lighting at Temecula Valley High School
The contractor started the digging for the lighting foundation. This project will install tennis court lighting along
with landscaping, irrigation, fencing, striping, and minor concrete work at Temecula Valley High School.
Estimated completion date for this project is August 1999.
10. Rotary Park
The contractor will start work once the cquipn~cnt is delivered (late July). The work is expected to take two (2)
weeks to complete. This project will install a picnic shade structure, picnic tables, fencing, concrete and drainage
structures.
Construction is anticipated to bc completed in August.
2 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\99XJuneRevised .doc
PROJECTS BEING BID
1. Traffic Signals on Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road and at Pauba Road
Design is complete, and authorization to advertise for public bids was granted by City Council on May 11,1999.
Bids were opened June 10, 1999. Project was awarded to DBX, Inc. on June 22, 1999. Due to the signal
equipment lead-time, construction is anticipated to begin in August.
2. Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail Undercrossing
This project will construct a bike trail in the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek under Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N)
bridge. Bids were opened on July 1, 1999. The apparent low bidder was Granite Construction Company with a
bid amount of $268,268. The City Council awarded the Contract to Granite Construction at their July 13, 1999
meeting. Construction on this project is anticipated to begin in August.
3. Street Name Sign Replacement - Phase I
This project will replacc existing strcct namc signs in thc Santiago Estates area with ncw plastic molded signs.
Design plans and specifications for this project xvcre complctcd and the project was advertised for bids. The bids
werc opened on June 17. 1999. Thc apparent low bidder was J.K. Wcigle Engineering xvith a of $40,611.16. The
City Council awarded the Contract to J.K. Wciglc Engineering at their July 13, 1999 meeting.
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Pavement Management System:
Staff received final plans from the consultant. Staff will add the design to pave Winchester Road from Jefferson
Avenue to Diaz Road to the project plans and specifications. This project will provide strect rehabilitation of
Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Rancho California Road and on Winchester Road from
Jefli:rson Avenue to Diaz Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire
length of Jefferson Avenue.
Construction is anticipated to begin m August 1999 with an estimated completion date of October 1999.
2. Pujol Street Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter:
The survey is complete and City staff' is currcntly designing the project. The design is 95% complete.
3. 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road
Phase I will add one (1) southbound lane on the 1-15 Freeway and xvidcn the northbound on-ramp to two lanes.
Phase II will widen the bridge ovcr the Santa Gertrudis Creek at the southbound off-ramp. On May 11, 1999,
City Council authorized staff to solicit bids once Caltrans approves the plans and specifications. Caltrans
approval is pending.
3 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\99\JuneRevised.doc
4. 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Rancho California Road
This project will add one (1) southbound lane on the I-15 Freeway, widen both on-ramps to two lanes, widen the
north side of Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to the noah bound ramp, lengthen the west bound left turn
pocket at Front Street. On May 11. 1999. City Council authorized staff to solicit bids once Caltrans approves
the plans and specifications. Caltrans approval is pending.
5. Butterfield Stage Park Improvements
This project will construct a basketball court near the existing parking lot. An informal bid process was
conducted. One bid was received xvith a bid amount that is substantially greater than the Enginccr's estimate. This
project will be re-bid using the formal bid process.
6. Old Town Southside Parking Lots
The project is currently being designed in-house. This project consists of two (2) proposed parking lots. One
will be located on the west side of Front Street just north of Second Street. and the other lot is located on the south
side of Fourth Street west of Front Street.
7. First Street Bridge
Final construction drawings are complete: construction advertisement is scheduled for July 1999. Staff is waiting
for the technical specifications from design consultants so the bid package can be assembled and distributed.
8. Citywide Bike Path Construction
The design of this project is complete. This project xvill stripe bike lanes along Jefferson Avenue from Rancho
California Road to Sanborn Avenue. Yncz Road from Tower Plaza North to Overland Drive. and Rancho
California from Margarita Road to Riosling Court.
9. Traffic Signal and Median Modification at Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive
This project will modify the intersection to expedite turning movements and to allow for longer green time on
Rancho Califomia Road. Improvements will include the relocation of signal poles, installation of new handicap
ramps, modification of median islands, and restriping the intersection.
4 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\99~JuneRevised .doc
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: ~q~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: July 6, 1999
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - June, 1999
I I / I
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-
house personnel for the month of June, 1999:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 23
B. Total signs installed 30
C. Total signs repaired 4
II.
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
115
III.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
9,744
110
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
0
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
122,020
VI.
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
28
1,845
VII.
STENCILING
A. 398
B. 18,797
New and repainted legends
L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 49 service order requests ranging from weed
abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is
compared to 37 service order requests for the month of May, 1999.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 204 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of June, 1999 was
$ 46,259.25 compared to $ 132,096.77 for the month of May, 1999.
Account No. 5402 $ 46,259.25
Account No. 5401 $ -0-
Account No. 999-5402 ~ -0-
CC:
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
All Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
.Z
~g
qqqqqqqqq~
UJ
I--
LU
W>-
O..j
Z4::
4::0
LU--
i--u-
Z
{:~:~:~:~:~:~:!:!:i:i:~:~
:~:~:~:~:~?!:!:!:i:i:!.
.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'.'.'.'
::::::::::::::::::::::::
0
0 0
0 0
O 0 0
0 0
I~,
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
~9
0 0 ~ ~
O
~ 0
,
............................ ~--~ t,, ~- uJ ~ E~
::~::~:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,, ® '~ i.~ ·g ,, -~ ,
:: :.:: "~ :. i:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I--~ ~ <~ o(:.3 :~~ 0 E E ~ ~ ~ ~. m '~ E m (~ ·
o .-e o ( ~ o ~ e~'-
~ u ~ ~ ~ o
::~'~;~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ~ ~~ m 0 ~ ~ u u ·
~::~::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::< < o ~ o- ~m~ ~ ~
.....................................~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Bo~z<~
(.)~:,,,
~:0
0
I.-
0
14.1
I-
0
0
o .,:r
I-
0
ILl m
I-- m
ILl "1
._1 _
O~
(.)
0
n,'
uJ
I-
t-- u~
D
c~
m
D
C,
._1
LLI
I-
Z
n aj
LLI ~.1
0
iii I:
0
iii
/
_J
iii
Z
Z
'I-
0
UJ
W
W
~ 0
W
(t'J uJ
0
iii
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of June, 1999
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE
CONTRACTOR:
Date: 06/14/99
# 5402
Date: 06/21/99
# 5402
Date: 06/21/99
# 5402
Date: 06/21/99
# 5402
Date: 06/21/99
# 5402
CONTRACI'OR:
Date: 06/01/99
it 5402
TORAN I)EVEL()PMENT & CONSTR.
OLD TOWN
RE-SEAL, SAND & REPAIR BOARDWALK
6TM STREET
TOTAL COST $ 4,910.25
RE-SEAL, SAND & REPAIR BOARDWALK
SWING INN
TOTAL COST $ 4,995.75
INSTALL 4 6" X 6" BUMPER POSTS AT DRiVE
APPROACH
MAIN STREET
TOTAL COST $ 2,836.00
EMERGENCY REPAIR TO LIGHT POST
OLD TOWN
TOTAL COST $ 108.25
REMOVE WOODEN BENCH TOP FROM
RETAINING WALL & REPLACE WITH P.C.C.
TOTAL COST $ 5,000.00
RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING
VIA BIRSAS TREATMENT OF 56 TREES AND WEED
OLD TOWN SPRAYING ON LOTS.
TOTAL COST $ 6,125.00
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of June, 1999
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE
CONTRACTOR:
Date: 06/16/99
# 5402
CONTRACTOR:
Date: 06/25/99
# 5402
CONTRACTOR:
Date: 06/22/99
# 5402
MONTELI'X)NE EXCAVATING.
OLD TOWN
N.P.G. CORI~ORATION
PALA ROAD AT SR 79 LOWER
PESTMASTER SERVICES
CALLE ARAGON
R.O.W. WEED SPRAYING
C()N'I'RAC'I'()R:
Date: 06/15/99
# 5402
Date: 06/15/99
#5402
BECKER ENGINEERING
CITYWIDE
42368RIONEDO
GRADING OF LOTS AND STREET WASH DOWN
TOTAL COST $ 4,800.00
CONSTRUCT RIGHT TURN LANE & STRIPING
TOTAL COST $ 4,999.00
TREATMENT OF 34 ALDER TREES & R.O.W.
WEED SPRAYING
TOTAL COST $ 2,500.00
ASPHALT SAW CUTTING FOR PATCH TRUCK
TOTAL COST
R & R 70' OF CURB & GUTTER & A.C.
OVERLAY STREET
$ 4,995.00
TOTAL COST
$4,990.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT#5~I
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT#5~2
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT~9-5~2
-0-
$ 46,259.25
-0-
r'~
I.U
r,/)
z !--
~ +
LU
Z
.DATE
o6/ol/99
o6/ol/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/04/99
06/09/99
o6/11/99
o6/11/99
o6/18/99
06/18/99
06/18/99
06/25/99
06/29/99
06/29/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF JULY, 1999
LOCATION
I-15 AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CHANNEL
I-15 AT WINCHESTER (ON FREEWAY)
YNEZ 1,000' NORTH OF PAUBA
HUMBER AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT FRONT STREET
YNEZ AT TOWN PLAZA
WINCHESTER AT I- 15
29955 PECHANGA DRIVE
MORAGA PARK
MIRA LOMA AT RANCHO VISTA
27338 JEFFERSON, 1-15 FWY SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP
(TOTAL OF 12 LOCATIONS)
MAIN STREET BRIDGE
NORTH EAST CITY LIMIT MONUMENT WALL
MAIN STREET BRIDGE
EMPIRE CREEK / TOWN CENTER
CORTE ENCINA AND PASEO DE LAS OLAS
WORK COMPLETED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
285 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
71 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
539 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
346 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
417 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
13 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED
TOTAL LOCATIONS
1,845
28
R:MMAINTAINXWKCMPLTD\GRAFFITIX99UULY.99 .DOC
DATE
RECEIVED
06/01/99
06/01/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/07/99
06/08/99
06/08/99
06/09/99
06/09/99
06/09/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/14/99
06/14/99
06/14/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/17/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS D1VISION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF JUNE, 1999
I .OCATION
REQUEST
HYDRAULIC FLUID SPILL
SINK HOLE IN A.C.
SINK HOLE
PARKING LOT "ODOR"
R-1 DOWN
TREE TRIMMING
TREE TRIMMING
WEEDS IN CRACKS
BROKEN CMP
ROOT PRUNING
OIL SPILL
TREE TRIMMING
A.C. REPAIR
PAINT SPILL
GRAFFITI
PAINT SPILL
TREE TRIMMING
S.N.S. MISSING
ROOT PRUNING
TREE DOWN
TREE CONCERN
DEAD TREE
ALGAE IN CURB & GUTTER
SINK HOLE
42733 TIERRA ROBLES PLACE
44024 QUIET MEADOW ROAD
40010 HOLDEN CIRCLE
26403 YNEZ ROAD
30485 SIERRA MADRE DRiVE
42041 AVENIDA VISTA LADERA
MARGARITA ROAD BEFORE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH
COSTAIN HOMES
43442 CALLE DE VELARDO
41579 AVENIDA DE LA REINA
45546 CLUB HOUSE
43372 VIA ANGELUS
30747 SAN PASQUAL ROAD
29840 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL
30046 PECHANGA DRiVE
29840 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL
31038 CORTE CANTERA
31705 CALLE SARAGOZA
31705 PASEO GOLETA
41831 5TM STREET
40699 CALLE KATERINA
41865 HUMBER DRIVE
32210 VIA CESARIO
MARGARITA ROAD AT SHELL STATION
DATE WORK
COMPLETED
06/01/99
06/01/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/07/99
06/08/99
06/08/99
06/09/99
06/09/99
06/09/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/14/99
06/14/99
06/14/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/17/99
R:XMAINTAINXWKCMPLTD\SORSX99~IUNE.99.DOC
DATE
I/ECEIVE!)
06/17/99
06/17/99
06/17/99
06/18/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/23/99
06/23/99
06/23/99
06/24/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/29/99
1~O(2ATION
43085 BUSINESS PAI,CK DRIVE
41559 YANKEE RUN COURT
32230 CALLE TORi~NTE
41844 4ru STREET
42140 LYNDIE LANE
MARGAPdTA SOUTH OF YUKON
30110 LEVANDE PLACE
MARGARITA AT DARTOLO ROAD
30194 PECHANGA DRIVE
27999 JEFFERSON
40358 CALLE KATHERINE
403 12 WINDSOR ROAD
40536 CA[,I,E KAT[ IERINE
40312 WINDSOR ROAD
31770 VIA SALTIO
29762 CALLE PANTANO
31470 PASEO COLETA
CORTE MONTIEL
30745 MIRA LOMA DRIVE
29826 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL
CORTE ENCINA AT PASEO DE LAS OLAS
29633 CALLE VIOLETTA
43530 VIA BARROZO
42040 KAFFIRBOOM COURT
TOTAL SERVICE
REQUEST
TREE DOWN
SIGN REPLACEMENT
P.C.C. REPAIRS
REPLACE SANDBAGS
V-DITCH CLEANING
STREET SINKING
TREE TRIMMING
TREE TRIMMING
TREE REMOVAL
POTHOLE
P.C.C. REPAIRS
P.C.C. REPAIRS
NATURAL SPRING IN YARD
P.C.C. REPAIRS
PICK UP SNS
MANHOLE COVER NOISE
TREE TRIMMING
GRAFFITI
POTHOLE
PAINT SPILL
GRAFFITI
CHANNEL CONCERN
CATCH BASIN REPAIR
STREET SWEEPING
ORDER REQUESTS 49
DATE WORK
COM PI,ETEI)
06/17/99
06/17/99
06/17/99
06/18/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/23/99
06/23/99
06/23/99
06/24/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/28/99
06/29/99
R:MVlAINTAIN~WKCMPLTD\SOR. SM99'dUNE.99.DOC
DATE
06/01/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/22/99
06/28/99
06/30/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF JUNE, 1999
LOCATION
5n~ STREET AT MERCEDES
C STREET AT SANTIAGO
YNEZ AT PREECE CHANNEL
YNEZ SOUTH OF PAUBA
CALLE HALCON AT YNEZ
PAUBA EAST OF YNEZ
C STREET AT SANTIAGO
PAUBA AT VILLA ALTURAS
MARGARITA AT DARTOLO
RANCHO VISTA AT MARGARITA
MARGARITA ROAD NORTH OF PIO PICO
WORK COMPLETED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
TRIMMED
R.O.W. TREES
18 R.O.W. TREES
3 R.O.W. TREES
8 R.O.W. TREES
1 R.O.W. TREES
27 R.O.W. TREES
19 R.O.W. TREES
2 R.O.W. TREES
1 R.O.W. TREES
9 R.O.W. TREES
26 R.O.W. TREES
TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED
115
R:MMAINTAII~WKCMPLTD\TR~ES~99XJUNE.99.DOC
DATE
06/01/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/08/99
06/09/99
06/10/99
06/14/99
06/15/99
06/16/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/22/99
06/28/99
06/29/99
06/30/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF JUNE, 1999
LOCATION
SCOPE OF WORK
OLD TOWN 2ND STREET
CITYWIDE "RAIN"
OLD TOWN REPAIRS
OLD TOWN REPAIRS
DIAZ NORTH OF//27711
PALA ROAD AT HURON
CITYWIDE
FRONT STREET AT ALBERTOS
VIA NORTE WEST OF CALLE PI~IA COLADA
JOHN WARNER ROAD NORTH OF CABRILLO
MARGARITA SOUTH OF YUKON
MONTELEGRO WAY AT CORTE BENAVENTE
RIO NEDO EAST OF TIERRA VISTA
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD
CITYWIDE POTHOLES
A.C. OVERLAY
FILL POTHOLES
A.C. OVERLAY
A.C. OVERLAY
REMOVE & REPLACE A.C.
REMOVE & REPLACE A.C.
POTHOLE REPAIRS
R&R A.C.
A.C. OVERLAY
A.C. OVERLAY
A.C. OVERLAY
R&R A.C.
A. C. OVERLAY
A. C. OVERLAY
A. C. OVERLAY
FILL POTHOLES
S.F.
2,291
91
470
953
280
138
518
121
313
1,400
430
72
1,806
122
525
214
TOTAL
TONS
6
TEMP. A.C.
4.5
5.5
8.5
5
3.5
4.5
3.5
32.00
3
1.5
22
3.5
3.5
3.5
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS
TOTAL TONS
9.744
110
R:MMAINTAIN IWKCM PLTDXASPHALT. RPRL°9~UNE.99
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
MONTH OF JUNE, 1999
DATE
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/07/99
06/07/99
06/08/99
06/08/99
06/09/99
06/10/99
06/11/99
06/14/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
06/16/99
06/21/99
!.,OCATION
YNEZ AT PREECE CHANNEL
YNEZ EAST OF PAUBA AND RANCHO VISTA
RANCHO VISTA EAST OF MARGARITA
YNEZ SOUTH OF TIERRA VISTA
PAUBA EAST OF MEADOWS
PAUI3A WEST OF MARGARITA
JEFFERSON NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
PAUBA ROAD EAST OF YNEZ
WINCHESTER AT I- 15
PALA ROAD CHANNEL
PALA ROAD CHANNEL
WINCHESTER AT I- 15
VIA LOBO CHANNEL
VIA LOBO CHANNEL
JEFFERSON NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WEST SIDE
MARGARITA NORTH OF YUKON
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT I- 15 FWY SOUTH SIDE
JEFFERSON NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WEST SIDE
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~, I-15 FWY NORTH SIDE
MARGARITA SOUTH OF IL~.NCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
WORK COMPLETED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
ABATED
3,000
7,000
4,000
2,000
1,000
39,000
200
2,600
3,000
5,000
14,800
3,500
500
5,500
6,125
852
2,823
18,300
1,500
1,320
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED
122.020
R:~IAINTAFN~WKCMPLTD\WEEDSLog~R..~qE.99.DOC
DATE '! '
06/01/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/09/99
06/09/99
06/11/99
06/11/99
06/11/99
06/16/99
06/17/99
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/23/99
06/24/99
06/24/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SIGNS
MONTH OF JUNE, 1999
LOCATION
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD NORTH OF GOLF COURSE
MARGARITA AT MORAGA
PAUBA EAST OF VIA CELDA
LOMA LINDA
MARGARITA AT PAUBA
CORTE CANTINA AT AVENIDA SONORA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMBER
LAKE VILLAGE AREA
LA SERENA AT MEADOWS
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ SOUTHWEST
CORNER
FRONT STREET AT PLAZA DEL RIO
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF FRONT
STREET
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF FRONT
STREET
RANCHO CALIAFORNIA ROAD WEST OF BUSINESS
PARK DRIVE
VIA LOBO CHANNEL
END OF DARTOLO
MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLO
JEFFERSON AT CALLE CORTEZ
EL LUCERO AND JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER
WORK COMPLETED
REPLACED W-14 "T.C."
REPLACED R-61 "T. C."
REPLACED R26D "T.C."
INSTALLED 2R-2-25
REPLACED R- 1 "T. C."
REPLACED R-1 "MISSING"
REPLACED R-26D & R-81 COMBO "T.C.'
REPLACED 7 TYPE "K' "MISSING"
INSTALLED W63, W63A, W65, W65A & R72
INSTALLED R-18-1
REPLACED 2 R-26
INSTALLED R2 "40"
T.C.
INSTALLED R.V. SIGN
REPLACED W-75 "MISSING"
REPLACED W-31 2 "N" MARKERS
"MISSING"
INSTALLED 4 "N" MARKERS & W31
INSTALLED 2 W-17, 2 R-i, 4 R-l-3
INSTALLED S.N. S.
REPLACED S.N.S.
INSTALLED R-96 & R-96-B
T.C.
R:XMAINTAIN~xWKCMPLTDXSIGNS~99~JUNE.99
DATE
06/25/99
06/28/99
06/29/99
06/29/99
LOCATION
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST AND WEST OF
YNEZ
31468 CORTE MONTIEL
WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON
BUECKING ROAD AT JEFFERSON
WORK COMPLETED
INSTALLED 2 R-18 & W 74
REPLACED W-53 GRAFFITI
REPLACED R-18 MISSING
REPLACED RED "N' MARKER MISSING
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED
23
30
4
R:XMAINTAFNXWKCMPLTD\SIGNS\99XJUNE.99
DATE LOCATION
06/01/99 AREA #1
06/07/99 OLD TOWN
06/08.99 OLD TOWN
06/09/99 OLD TOWN
06/10/99 OLD TOWN
06/14/99 AREA #1
06/21/99 AREA #1
06/22/99 PALA ROAD AT LOWER HWY 79
06/22/99 AREAS #2 & #3
06/24/99 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA
06/28/99 FRONT STREET AT SANTIAGO
06/28/99 AREA #2
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
STENCILS/ STRIPING
MONTH OF JUNE, 1999
REPAINTED
REPAINTED
REPAINTED
REPAINTED
REPAINTED
REPA1NTED
REPA1NTED
REPAINTED
REPAINTED
INSTALLED &
REPAINTED
INSTALLED &
REPAINTED
REPAINTED
WORK COMPLETED
8,790 L.F. OF RED CURB
194 LEGENDS
101 LEGENDS
31 LEGENDS
22 LEGENDS
5,668 L.F. OF RED CURB
13 LEGENDS
6 LEGENDS
1,000 L.F. OF RED CURB
16 LEGEND S
15 LEGENDS
3,339 L.F. OF RED CURB
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F.
3,98
18,797
R:XMAINTAIN~WKCMPLTD\STRIPINGX99XJUNE.99.DOC
c~ c~